NOVEMBER FREEDOM NOWPT1-2017(1994 -Official Website -NOV-PT2 2017-NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART3-2017

NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART4-2017

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

*

[Brought forward from  December,2008.

[A REMINDER!]

Closing Time for England

by Graham Booth

 

They're closing down our sceptred isle

The P.C. freaks have won the day

Our days of elegance and style-

Just memories with which to play

*

Our right to rule ourselves has now gone ;

Afraid to speak lest we offend

How have things gone so badly wrong?

Is England coming to an end?

*

No discipline; no sense of pride.

Outnumbered by non-English folk.

Our Christian faith they've set aside-

Could this all be a ghastly joke?

 

 

 

Our farming wreaked; our fishing too;

Our coal and steel as rare as gold-

We have to ask the question: "Who

Has let this tale of woe unfold?"

*

Have politicians given in

To those who hate our British phlegm?

They live inside a world of spin-

It seem it's down to "us!" and "them".

*

So little time to sit and grieve-

Our blessed plot exists no more

If you're the last true Brit to leave

Please dim the lights and lock the door.

 IN OCTOBER 2017

 [We are back to claim our REALM of ENGLAND but the DOOR to FREEDOM is still locked after 15 months of dithering by that same lot who are talking of years before we are FREE instead of reclaiming our cherished plot on JUNE 6,next year-A DAY TO REMEMBER when ENGLISHMEN and others in 1944 stormed the beaches of NORMANDY to SET EUROPE FREE! and that is what ENGLAND'S FREEDOM MEANS TO ME!]

 *

Letter to eurofacts-19th December, 2008

eurofacts@junepress.com

*

'THE FIGHT MUST GO ON TO SET OUR COUNTRY FREE

FROM TRAITORS WITHIN AND BEYOND OUR SEA

THAT'S WHAT ENGLAND MEANS TO ME

 THE ONLY MEMBER OF THE EDP!'

*

HOW IT ALL BEGAN

*

  [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 BROUGHT FORWARD FROM DECEMBER 19,2008

H.F.1357-OCTOBER 23,2017

 

nov FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017 - (1994 -Official Website - NOV-PT2--2017 )--  novFREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017

NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART4-2017

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

 
News for DAILY MAIL

-I'm not surprised the absurd C of E says boys can wear tiaras to school. All common sense has been lost in the gender debate

 

 by A.N.Wilson

NOVEMBER 14,2017

The rolling tide of transgender

propaganda continues to gather force. Recently, the retail chain Topshop made clear its changing cubicles are now gender neutral, even though thousands of women feel more secure undressing in an all-female space.

How many people — really how many — feel deeply wounded by the fact there are female changing rooms which are separate from male changing rooms? Could they not, politely and kindly, be told to 'get over it'?

Meanwhile, it was reported on Sunday that drag queens are being brought into taxpayer-funded nursery schools in London to teach children about sexual and gender diversity.

Confusion

Nursery bosses believe it will be good for these very young children to meet people who 'defy rigid gender restrictions'. I would humbly suggest they should be learning to add up and spell words correctly, but there you are.

One could argue that those nurseries are only following the lead of the Scottish government, which recently issued guidance that would permit primary school pupils to change gender without their parents' permission.

Those of us who have a love-hate relationship with the Church of England, admiring its fundamental principles of Christian worship, but increasingly despairing at its innate absurdity and collective intellectual cowardice, knew it would not be long before it yielded to the current fad.

Sure enough, it has now ruled that in its 4,700 C of E schools new guidelines must be followed on cross-dressing and 'transgender' questions.

School uniform is seen to create potential difficulties for 'trans pupils' and should, if necessary, be abolished. Boys as young as five should be encouraged, if they wish, to come to school wearing tiaras, tutus and high heels.

There is so much emotional and mental confusion going on here, one really does not know where to begin unravelling it — but let it be said loud and clear that this ludicrous attempt to be kind has already led to unnecessary suffering.

Joshua Sutcliffe, a teacher aged 27, saluted a pair of pupils as 'girls'. One of them was 'identifying' as a boy, and the 'hurt' caused has led not merely to the teacher being reprimanded; he is in real danger of losing his job.

When I think of the severe way even the kindest teachers used to address us in the Fifties and Sixties, I do wonder what kind of schoolchildren we are breeding. Naturally, I rejoice in the new spirit of kindliness and tolerance which is abroad in the land, but this question of transgender has moved us all into a surreal inversion of common sense.

'Pupils need to be able to play with the many cloaks of identity and to explore the possibility of who they might be,' says the achingly solemn instruction from the Church.

'For example, a child might choose the tutu, the princess's tiara and heels and/or the fireman's helmet, tool belt and superhero cloak without expectation or comment.'

If you were planning a children's party in your own home, it might seem reasonable to suggest the guests could come in any costumes they chose. If girls wanted to turn up dressed as Harry Potter, or boys as nuns, only a puritan would wish to stop them.

Quite why they should be allowed to do so at school is, surely, a different matter — and why any little child, of whatever gender, should be encouraged to wear high-heeled shoes is a mystery probably only the Archbishop of Canterbury and his politically correct consultants could answer.

The C of E has now ruled that in its 4,700 C of E schools new guidelines must be followed on cross-dressing and 'transgender' questions (pictured, Justin Welby)

Apart from anything else, they are extremely bad for your feet, as any bishop would know if he or she had worn them.

Although the new C of E guidelines come in the guise of a campaign against bullying, they specifically single out 'homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying'. And it is really yet another bit of propaganda from the more strident members of the transgender lobby, who can behave with such intransigence and intolerance towards anyone who dares question their ideas.

To be kind to anyone, of whatever age, who is confused about their identity is surely a moral duty for all of us — parents, children and schools.

I have no doubt there are people who feel, when they have become adults, that they were born into the wrong body: they deserve our understanding and should be helped with appropriate treatment. But for a pressure group to lobby for children to question the gender into which they were born seems not merely unhelpful but positively wicked.

The Tavistock Clinic in London, which has a unit that specialises in children and gender transitioning, reports a roughly 20-fold increase in the numbers it sees since 2009.

At the unit, children are sometimes not only given therapy but helped to take steps towards physical sex-change through the use of hormone blockers.

Indulge

It is one thing for a mature person to reach the conclusion that they were really, all along, meant to be a different gender. It is quite another to indulge such confusing ideas in the mind of a child who has not yet finished the bewildering, transformative business of growing up.

No decent school tolerates bullying of any kind, whether it is name-calling, cyber-bullying or physical abuse.

Clearly, to persecute a child because he or she is confused about their gender is as cruel as teasing them for being a 'ginger', or on grounds of race, or whatever it may be.

I do not believe any school in the country does not keep a sharp lookout for this abuse, nor do I think there is any trained teacher who does not know it is their duty to protect children from bullying.

 

It was reported on Sunday that drag queens are being brought into taxpayer-funded nursery schools in London to teach children about sexual and gender diversity

Equally, many children go through phases when they do not particularly like identifying as their own sex. Think of Georgina, the 'tomboy', as they called them in those days, in Enid Blyton's The Famous Five, who cut her hair short, dressed like a boy and insisted on being called George.

Many a tomboy has groaned at having to wear a tunic or a skirt for their school uniform, and no doubt there are some boys who would like to wear girls' clothes, though we are surely at liberty to wonder how many. But there is the world of difference between a tomboy and a girl who is actively encouraged to think of herself as a male.

Derision

That's why I believe it is contemptible for the Church to kowtow to pressure from the transgender movement.

It is also completely illogical. Already, one of the Archbishop of Canterbury's advisers, Lorna Ashworth, a conservative evangelical, has resigned over the Church's desire to be so inclusive that it forgets its own teaching.

The C of E still officially teaches, as do all mainstream churches in the world, that God created the sexes to be distinct. It still condemns sexual activity outside heterosexual marriage as sinful, and forbids the homosexual marriage of its clergy.

Yet, while clinging to this severe and perhaps outmoded way of looking at sexual questions in its theological teachings, in its schools — where impressionable young people are most directly affected — it thinks it a good idea to proselytise about transgender rights.

It would be simply laughable were it not so troubling. This is a Church with an appalling record of covering up child abuse and sexual molestation by bishops and clergy.

Its teaching on sex and marriage is so muddled as to be beneath derision. And now it caves in to the transgender lobby in a move which, while trying to help the tiny number of children who want to 'identify' as a different gender, will surely serve only to confuse the great majority.

 

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5079597/The-absurd-Church-England-says-boys-wear-tiaras.html#ixzz4yUwVMn24
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

 

HOW IT SHOULD BE!

'Christianity everywhere gives dignity to labor, sanctity to marriage, and brotherhood to man-were it may not convince, it enlightens; where it does not convert it restrains; where it does not renew, it refines; where it does not sanctify, it subdues and elevates.-It is profitable alike for this world, and for the world that is to come.-Lord Lawrence

*

How A MAN FROM THE CITY OF LONDON COULD BE EXPECTED TO UNDERSTAND THE TRUE PRECEPTS OF CHRISTIANITY TO BE AN ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY WAS A MISNOMER.

 

NOVEMBER 14-2017

 

H.F.1379

Khazarian mob takedown:  Hundreds of Saudi arrests followed by hundreds of U.S. arrests

The great purge of Khazarian mobsters continues as hundreds of arrests of Saudi princes, generals, and politicians is now being followed up with the 842 sealed indictments against senior Khazarian gangsters in the U.S., confirmed by Pentagon, CIA, and other sources.

https://twitter.com/damartin32/status/929601088570974208

Pentagon sources sent the photos below showing Hillary Clinton and U.S. Senator John “Daesh” McCain “in custody wearing orthopedic boots to hide GPS ankle bracelet on their right leg.”

The fact is that most politicians in Washington, D.C. have become very rich since joining politics, in ways that cannot be remotely justified by their salaries.  This means most have been bribed, and that is why most of them are going to go to jail.  House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has been deliberately acting senile in public recently in order to have a medical excuse to avoid arrest, NSA sources say.

These same NSA sources are now saying the mass shooting that took place in Las Vegas on October 1 was an attempt by mercenaries working for the G4S security company http://www.g4s.com/ hired by George Bush Sr. to create a distraction in order to kill U.S. President Donald Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad Bin Sultan (MBS).  Trump and MBS were meeting in secret at the suites in the Mandalay Bay Hotel, owned by MBS, to discuss the mass arrest of the perpetrators of the 9/11 terror attacks, these sources say.

Both Trump and MBS were evacuated safely and the arrests have now begun in a way that can no longer be denied by the corporate propaganda media, multiple sources confirm.
As the arrests were taking place, Trump had a secret meeting in Vietnam with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping.  Here is what a CIA source, who had eyes and ears at the meeting, had to say.

“There is a lot more than the ‘the sideline meetings and brief handshakes’ that the media has portrayed.  The three world leaders (Trump, Putin, and Xi Jinping) met off the record.  President Jokowi [of Indonesia] was there as well (as a representative of the Soekarno M1 gold holdings).  Trump was informed that next month, Putin and/or the Russian Central Bank will
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Purge of Khazarian mobsters intensifies as Trump is kept safe in Asia

There can be no doubt whatsoever that the worldwide purge of the Khazarian mafia now has reached a tipping point of no return, with arrests and purges in the U.S. and Saudi Arabia.

In the Middle East, Iran-linked Hezbollah now effectively rules Lebanon after Saudi puppet Prime Minister Saad Hariri was forced to resign.  His resignation was followed by the purge of hundreds of princes, generals, religious leaders, and others by de facto Saudi King Muhammad bin Salman.

This purge was especially important because it cut off one of the last major remaining sources of Bush/Clinton mafia money and power.  Many of the princes purged were homosexually bonded with members of the Bush family and their top lieutenants when they studied in the United States, according to confessions of Kay Griggs, wife of a Skull and Bones Society member, and others.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp_i1F-1lcA

This is how Pentagon sources described the unfolding crackdown:  “The Saudi purge of the Bush-Clinton pedo terror faction—including [Osama Bin Laden’s brother] Bakr bin Laden and anti-Trumper [Prince] Al-Waleed bin Talal—is timed to the Paradise Papers leak,

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/nov/05/paradise-papers-leak-reveals-secrets-of-world-elites-hidden-wealth?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_New_Post

…the arrest of Tony Podesta, and the surrender of Hillary Clinton and John Podesta.”  Tony Podesta is a powerful Washington lobbyist whose brother John was campaign manager for Hillary Clinton (Rockefeller) and chief of staff for Bill Clinton (Rockefeller).  Al-Waleed bought large shareholdings of Rockefeller’s Citibank.

The ramifications of these leaks, arrests, and purges reach out in many directions.  Aftershocks, further arrests, and further purges are sure to be felt and seen in the Middle East, Japan, Europe, and the U.S. over the coming days.

Already, Trump Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross (child) has been implicated.  So has Canadian magnate Stephen Bronfman, whose family made its fortune selling booze to Al Capone.  These names are just the tip of the iceberg.

The start of the purge was timed to coincide with Trump’s visit to Asia so as to be able to more easily protect Trump and his family from retaliatory action, say Pentagon and CIA sources.

However, in a sign that the battle is far from over, two separate warnings were conveyed to this writer last week concerning Trump.  One was a “source close to North Korea,” and the other a veteran CIA officer stationed in Asia.  The North Korean-linked source said that if Trump
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

H.F.1377

QUENTIN LETTS on Labour's Barry Sheerman Brexit bashing | Daily ...

 

Just when you thought Remainers couldn't get more patronising, up pops this snooty ninny! QUENTIN LETTS on Labour backbencher Barry Sheerman

At the age of 77, Huddersfield’s Labour MP Barry Sheerman may not plan to stand again for re-election to the House of Commons.

We must certainly assume so given that the old booby just let slip he thinks his constituents in West Yorkshire are ill-educated. As election-winning strategies go, it is at least novel. Vote for me, thickos!

Mr Sheerman, a blowy Europhile, made his outburst during a television discussion at the weekend. Maybe the heat of the studio got to him, or over-excitement at being asked to take part in a live discussion on BBC TV’s Sunday Politics (backbencher Barry is rarely considered important enough for such invitations these days).

Talk turned to our EU referendum and Mr Sheerman closed his eyes, tilted his head and said: ‘The truth is that when you look at who voted to remain, most of them were the better educated people in our country.’ 

Disdain

If that was not la-di-dah enough for an MP whose own constituency is in an area (Kirklees) that voted by 54 per cent to leave the EU, Mr Sheerman also took a swipe at people who were educated at polytechnics.

He was cross that Conservative MP Chris Heaton-Harris has written to universities trying to find out what is being taught about Brexit.

‘This man who went to Wolverhampton Polytechnic,’ shuddered Mr Sheerman. ‘Who does he think he is? Trying to frighten my university in Huddersfield!’ The thrust of this was clear: poly-educated oiks such as Heaton-Harris have no place offering their opinion to us Varsity types.

That’s the Brexit vote and the Polytechnic vote slagged off in seconds. Good work, Barry. At this rate Theresa May will give you a knighthood for services to the Tory party.

Let us begin by trying to understand Mr Sheerman’s ‘snobbery’ — as one fellow guest in the studio put it. There is certainly data to show university graduates voted two to one in June 2016 to stay in the European Union.

Cambridge and Oxford, our best-known university strongholds, were hot for Remain. The British political, legal, media and academic elites were, and still are, markedly anti-Brexit. They clutch their necks with condescending disdain at those lower orders who voted for British independence.

It may seem unfair to pick on so slight a political figure as Barry Sheerman, a spongy middler who in the Blair years won the ‘Golden Pager Award’ for asking the most obsequious questions in Parliameny 

Mr Sheerman, it could be said, was merely stating facts when he hailed the intellectualism of the Remain camp. But it brings us up against the old truism that the longer someone has studied at university, the less clued up he or she may be. I say that as someone who attended three universities and who has often felt a hamfisted nincompoop alongside non-university friends.

Some of the quickest wits I know never went near a college campus, and many of our biggest idiots are those with fancy letters after their names.

It may seem unfair to pick on so slight a political figure as Barry Sheerman, a spongy middler who in the Blair years won the ‘Golden Pager Award’ for asking the most obsequious questions in Parliament.

In the past he has called for Buckingham Palace to be torn down (because it is one of Britain’s ugliest buildings), demanded that Britain join the Euro, and described a £7,000 pay rise for MPs as ‘pathetic’.

It probably tells you all you need to know about this sorry little man, but he’s again placed his head above the parapet, so here goes with the polemical mallet. His attitude stinks of entitlement, of patronising disdain, of a self-righteous sense of superiority over ‘the little people’. For a Labour MP — a Labour MP! — to express such views is dreadful; yet hardly surprising.

Mr Sheerman is typical of the illiberal Centre-Left which has done so much damage to this country in recent decades.

Labour sloganeering about ‘the many not the few’ is tommy-rot. They are vicious snobs and regard ‘the many’ as a herd of dumb cattle. There sits Mr Sheerman in the House of Commons, supposedly representing his constituents, yet plainly regards the majority of them as educationally inferior.

He studied at the London School of Economics, long a seed-bed of the worst sort of anti-popular, neo-elitist, pocket-filling Leftism. He has both a BSc and MSc in economics to his name. Bow down, ye voters of Huddersfield, to your twice mortar-boarded Member of Parliament.

Hail to your intellectual master, the chin-stroker, the brow-clutcher, that Erasmus de nos jours, Barry ‘the Brainbox’ Sheerman! You won’t be surprised to hear he opposes grammar schools (even though he went to one).

We don’t want the working-classes getting ideas above their stations, do we, Barry? This ninny, this snoot, this velvet-lined codpiece, Sheerman is typical of a Parliament which, with its allies in the Establishment, has gone on dirty protest about Brexit.

They kick, stamp, pout and blow bubbles about last year’s stonking, revolutionary referendum result. The Leave vote was a close but clear rejection not just of the European Union but also of the stooges and suck-ups who for years anti-democratically pushed Brussels down our throats.

Crucial

The Sheermans of this world argue that MPs are chosen by constituents to act and vote on various matters as they personally see fit. That an MP is entitled to take his or her view on, say, capital punishment, even though it may clash with majority opinion in the constituency. This, Burkean view of democracy — as argued by philosopher Edmund Burke — raises parliamentarians to the level of autonomous trustees, sent to the Commons to do as they see fit for the nation. Except, except, except . . . it is more complicated than that.

The EU referendum was not a parliamentary vote. The crucial thing was that it was beyond and above the House of Commons, and it was established as such by Parliament.

It trumped the Burkean ideal. If there was an element of trusteeship, it was that the Parliamentary class would obey the referendum’s verdict.

From Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer and Tory Dominic Grieve, to dimmer bulbs such as Mr Sheerman, Westminster’s Remainers put themselves above the majority — and pooh-pooh them as morons who ‘didn’t vote to become poorer’ or ‘didn’t vote to leave the Single Market’.

In his TV appearance, Mr Sheerman derided Conservatives for agreeing to respect the EU referendum result.

 

Theresa May will give Sheerman a knighthood for services to the Tory party if he keeps on offending voters at his current rate

Exquisite

The Tories were now ‘no longer the nasty party’ but ‘the stupid party’, he tweeted later.

Yes, how stupid of politicians to respect the will of the majority of voters in the biggest plebiscite held in our country.

The arrogance of these Remain extremists is sometimes matched only by the over-ripeness of their claims.

I recently heard Mr Sheerman claim, in the Commons, that he had met ‘not one person’ in the manufacturing or business sectors of Huddersfield or Leeds who wanted to leave the EU. He was either lying or picks acquaintances in pro-Brexit Yorkshire with exquisite hygiene.

Let us close by returning to the polling data from pro-EU areas. What exactly do those statistics from university towns tell us? Do they prove the intellectual superiority of the Remain case? Even if they did, the democratic will would surely have to prevail — unless you want riots on the street.

But might the statistics not just tell us our college populations like the world the way it is? University types, who tend to do better financially than non-degree holders, may not have wished their elitist privileges to be imperilled by change. Voting patterns may just be down to all-too human greed and protectionism.

Only a very stupid politician — such as Barry Sheerman — would fail to admit the possibility of that.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5033921/QUENTIN-LETTS-Labour-s-Barry-Sheerman-Brexit-bashing.html#ixzz4xSPznd8g
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

OCTOBER 31-2017

H.F.1365-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT- NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'SPLANNED EUDOMINATION OF EUROPE

 
 
 

[WE ARE LEAVING ONE NIGHTMARE AND ANOTHER  DISASTER OF EPIC PROPORTIONS WILL FOLLOW.],

Migrants fuel population boost

Migration 'to fuel uk population rise of 4.4 million by 2024' - Daily Mail

 

Migration 'to fuel UK population rise of 4.4 million by 2024'

The population of the UK is set to jump by the equivalent of a country the size of Ireland in the next decade, official figures have revealed.

Migration will fuel a projected rise of 4.4 million from 64.6 million last year to 69 million in 2024 and an estimated increase of just under 10 million over 25 years to reach 74.3 million in 2039.

It means the number of people living in Britain will swell by around the equivalent of the current populations of Ireland (4.6 million) and Sweden (9.6 million) over 10 years and a quarter of a century respectively.

 

The UK population is projected to reach 70 million by mid-2027, the ONS said

Experts said that on current trends, the UK will overtake Germany to become the most populous country in Europe before the middle of this century.

More than two thirds (68%) of the long-term rise is due to future net migration and the indirect impact of children born to migrants, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said.

It is assuming that annual net migration - the difference between the number of people entering and leaving the country - will run at an average of just under 200,000 a year over the 25 years.

The data also revealed a rapidly ageing society, with more than one in 12 people expected to be 80 or over by 2039.

Guy Goodwin, director of social analysis at the ONS, said: "The UK's population is set to grow and age.

"Growth will be at a faster rate than we have seen previously, largely due to the direct impact of international migration and the indirect impact of immigration.

"Despite this, the population will also be older as those born shortly after World War Two and during the 1960s 'baby boom' reach the oldest and pensionable ages respectively.

"The number of people of age 80 or over will more than double over the next 25 years."

Population projections, which are used to inform policies on pensions, migration, care and housing, are published every two years.

Compared to the last set of figures, which were based on 2012 estimates, experts have raised the projected growth over the next 10 years by just under a quarter of a million.

The average annual increase of 440,000 in the first decade means the population will rise by more than the number of people currently living in Dorset each year.

Britain's projected growth also far outstrips Europe, with an increase of 15% in the next 25 years compared to 3% in the EU.

Only Luxembourg, Belgium and Sweden are individually expected to see larger rises, although the projections for Europe were based on figures compiled prior to the recent migrant crisis.

If the current pattern continues, the UK will overtake France by 2030 and Germany, becoming the largest country in Europe, by 2047.

The figures prompted fresh scrutiny of ministers' attempts to reduce net migration to below 100,000. It stood at a record high of 330,000 in the year to March.

Lord Green, chairman of campaign group Migration Watch UK, said: "The prospect of nearly 10 million in 25 years underlines the huge impact on housing and public services, unless the Government succeeds in bringing net migration right down."

MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, the co-chairmen of the cross-party Group on Balanced Migration, said the ONS projections "set out in stark terms the consequences of not reducing immigration to the UK".

They added: "It is not in the national interest to increase our population so rapidly. It is not of benefit to the existing residents of the UK. The country will become still more overcrowded and the housing crisis even worse."

Simon Ross, chief executive of charity Population Matters said it was "imperative" that factors contributing to the increase are addressed.

"We are all affected adversely by the rapid population growth of recent decades - from pressures on housing and public services to the environment and climate change," he said.

Immigration Minister James Brokenshire pointed out the projections are not forecasts and are "based on various assumptions - including migration trends".

He added: " However, the projections underline the importance of controlling immigration and show that the Government is right to continue its work to reduce net migration to more sustainable levels."

Since 2010 the Government has worked to cut out abuse of the immigration system and introduced a health surcharge for those arriving from outside the European Economic Area, Mr Brokenshire said, adding that a new Controlling Migration Fund will ease pressure on services.

He said: "We know that uncontrolled, mass migration makes it difficult to maintain social cohesion and puts pressure on public services."

 
 

The UK population is projected to reach 70 million by mid-2027, the ONS said

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-3294715/Projections-UKs-population-announced.html#ixzz4wjrlBsJF
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*  *  *

[ This is now and in the future a colossal disaster to the settled population of our small once settled island home, only a quarter the size of GERMANY, which has a population of over 82 million, which is not so far from the anticipated population of ENGLAND in the next 30 years. And who are we to blame? Those Remainers over the past 45 years and others who decided they had better things to do than protect their country from the deluge of human kind the majority being economic migrants. If you haven't already noticed in many parts of our overcrowded land -still no doubt the most crowded country in Europe. Many people are taking as long to get to and from work as their work entails. Politicians of all parties have been grossly negligent in their decisions which has brought about this exodus from the Middle East and Europe itself.  A few decades ago, an economic and energy report made clear that around 30,000.000 would be an ideal population and now our once treasured beautiful landscape will in the main resemble NEW YORK and who have we to BLAME?

 

YOU!]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 Brought forward from:

OCTOBER,29-2015

*

H.F.1361

[A REVOLUTION NOW IN BEING!]

 

The autumn of Europe's discontent: With an anti-immigration Eurosceptic billionaire set to be the new Czech PM, MARK ALMOND explains why voters across the EU are in revolt

Now is the autumn of Europe’s discontent. With the shockwaves of recent election results in Germany and Austria, which have seen a surge in support for far-Right nationalist and Eurosceptic parties, still reverberating, it is the turn of the tiny Czech Republic to trigger yet more angst in Brussels.

The pro-Europe political Czech establishment has been upended by a 63-year-old Eurosceptic, anti-immigration, pro-Russian billionaire who is being hailed as the ‘Czech Donald Trump’.

Andrej Babis, whose party is the bluntly named Action for Dissatisfied Citizens (ANO), won 29.6 per cent of the vote at the weekend, or 78 out of 200 seats in the lower house, firmly shifting his nation to the Right. 

 

Andrej Babis, whose party is the bluntly named Action for Dissatisfied Citizens, with wife Monika 

The Czech Republic’s second-richest man, with a fortune estimated at £3.5 billion, he founded the ANO just two years ago ‘to fight corruption and other ills in the country’s political system’.

He was seen by voters as a maverick with the business know-how to shake up the system. 

The fact that Babis had served as finance minister in the previous government and resigned after allegations of fraud — which he insisted were politically motivated — seemed to have had no impact on him cornering the populist vote.

However, opponents of Babis, who was accompanied during the campaign by his glamorous second wife, Monika, view him as a danger to democracy because of his authoritarian leadership style, as well as his business interests, which could lead to a conflict of interest.

His media business includes two newspapers and a radio station and this has prompted comparisons with another billionaire media-magnate-turned-politician, Italy’s Silvio Berlusconi.

As the next Czech prime minister, Babis must now build partnerships with members of the eight factions to form a coalition — a challenge given the anti-establishment stance of his party.

 

In March, Dutch voters backed away from electing flamboyant, anti-Islam Eurosceptic Geert Wilders as their prime minister

His critics most fear an alliance with the Right-wing, anti-immigration Freedom and Direct Democracy party, which wants to quit the EU and stop the ‘Islamisation of the Czech Republic’, which won just less than 10.7 per cent of the vote. 

Its Czech-Japanese leader, Tomio Okamura, caused outrage at allegations that he urged Czechs to walk pigs near mosques and to stop eating kebabs.

So, another potential headache for the EU as yet another member state sees an outpouring of support for parties at odds with the Brussels way of doing things. 

It seems the EU’s principles, as well as its economic and monetary policies, are now under relentless attack from ordinary voters at every point of the compass.

So what is going on? Brexit was supposed to be a dire warning to any Europeans tempted to challenge the consensus at the heart of the EU. 

But the deadlock in negotiations and the eye-popping ‘divorce’ bills with which the UK is being threatened haven’t prompted member states to rally around the Euro-flag. 

Instead, much of the discontent — over immigration, sovereignty, border control, bailouts and a smug Euro-elite out of touch with the people they represent — which coalesced here into the Leave vote, is becoming a key issue for other EU member states.

And some of these states have their own, particular gripes. Instead of the Brits being dismissed as offshore eccentrics, dissent is growing in the most unlikely places.

In the spring, it seemed Brussels was winning the war for hearts and minds. The EU’s lavish PR machine went into overdrive to warn Europeans about the dangers of populism. 

 

Mark Rutte adopted many of Wilders's policies but steered clear of his harsh rhetoric on the campaign trail

Donald Trump’s election seemed a godsend since his brand of raucous, ‘America First’ politics would surely strike no chords here.

In March, Dutch voters backed away from electing flamboyant, anti-Islam Eurosceptic Geert Wilders as their prime minister. Phew — but the respectable winner, Mark Rutte, sailed close to the wind in adopting many of Wilders’s policies without his harsh rhetoric. 

Wilders came second — and now has a parliamentary launch pad for next time, if the economy falters and community relations sour further.

Then, in May, the photogenic Europhile Emmanuel Macron was elected president of France, but the National Front, Europe’s strongest and oldest hard-Right party, got as far as the second round and attracted almost a third of the vote, with a groundswell of support from the young.

Still, France seemed to lead a return to the Euro norm, and the Brexit vote was still dismissed as a hiccup on the road to ever greater European unification. 

But as autumn leaves began to fall, the EU Commission’s rose-tinted view of where Europe was headed turned ashen-grey.

What looms may mean darker times for us all. Increasingly, Macron’s defeat of the National Front’s Marine Le Pen looks like the last hurrah of the EU Old Guard. 

In September, Germany’s Angela Merkel emerged weakened from a general election which put a far-Right, nationalist party, the Alternative for Germany (AfD), into the Bundestag for the first time.

Frustration with the euro — low interest rates for a nation of savers and bailouts for spendthrifts such as Greece — was compounded by the migration issue and terrorism.

Today, Mrs Merkel is still struggling to form a coalition.

 

Angela Merkel is struggling to form a coalition in Germany while a right-wing coalition looks likely in neighbouring Austria

After last weekend’s election in Austria, new Chancellor and arch Euro-critic Sebastian Kurz of the Austrian People’s Party (OVP) is poised to form a coalition with the second-placed, far-Right nationalist party, the Freedom Party (FPO), some of whose members campaigned wearing the insignia of a blue cornflower, a secret symbol associated with the Nazi Party in Austria in the Thirties.

Analysts argue that Kurz’s success was down to adopting some of the FPO’s anti-immigration policies. Now Czech voters have joined the Austrians in raising the voices of smaller member states which feel that their interests have been ignored.

At the same time, the dismissive reaction of Brussels to Catalan nationalists’ demands has played badly with those small nations.

Right or wrong, the EU Commission’s siding with the Spanish government over Catalonia’s independence referendum has given the impression that Brussels is on the side of the big boys. 

Ethnic minorities and disgruntled regions no longer see the EU as an ally against the state which dominates them.

East European EU members hoped that escaping from communism after 1989 meant freedom to choose what policies they wanted. But the European Commission is being seen as a new Politburo.

 

Sebastian Kurz of the Austrian People’s Party is poised to form a coalition with the far-right Freedom Party, some of whose members campaigned wearing the insignia of a blue cornflower - a secret symbol associated with the Nazi Party

Instead of communist apparatchiks in Moscow, warning Poles against their religious practices, now Brussels bureaucrats lecture them on their backward attitudes informed by their Catholicism. 

Like Hungary, Poland has elected arch-conservatives, strong on family values and dead set against mass immigration by non-Christians as well as non-Europeans.

In a multi-cultural Britain where many British Asians also voted Leave because they shared Eurosceptic irritation with Brussels’s high-handedness, we may not sympathise with more blinkered nationalisms in Eastern Europe, but no one should doubt their popular base.

In Hungary, the PM, Viktor Orban, put up a new iron curtain, this time his barbed-wire fence was designed to stop Middle Eastern migrants getting in rather than to keep Hungarians from getting out.

 

Brussels fumed about bigotry, but the voters seem to like it.

This was not supposed to happen. The benefits of economic and monetary integration were supposed to trump the lure of such emotional ties as nationalism and patriotism despised by Brussels. 

But increasingly the way the single market, and especially the single currency, functions has aroused a multitude of discontent.

Instead of uniting Europe, the euro has antagonised Left and Right, squeezing the centre. Germans are unhappy with funding bailouts for Southern Europe, while people in those nations think the euro’s rules are the cause of their woes. The consensus in favour of the euro as it is now is shrinking.

And add to that unfettered migration and there should be no surprise at recent events. If you feel your domestic economic pie is small, then bringing in new people to share it stirs up trouble.

The EU’s way of handling mass immigration from the Middle East raised hackles. Poles, Hungarians, Serbs, Czechs and Austrians argue that Merkel invited a million migrants to Germany in 2016 without consulting the neighbours and is now pulling strings in Brussels to disperse the burden and save her own political skin.

Dismissed as narrow-minded and provincial by the EU, this is the key reason voters are rallying to Eurosceptic and anti-immigrant parties. 

Fear of the sort of terrorism which hit Britain, France and Germany is growing in countries with limited immigration so far.

The road to Brexit seems calm and rational compared with the seething anger and harsh rhetoric surfacing in much of the EU. Brussels seems nonplussed by the rising tide of rejection. 

 

Hungarian PM Viktor Orban erected a barbed-wire fence to stop Middle Eastern migrants getting in

Simply reiterating that the Euro-elite is right and its critics are bigots or stupid is not the way to swing doubters into line.

One size no longer fits all. Everyone can see that. But is there any plausible range of Euro-sizes which can keep everyone snug in the club? And what about Turkey’s president, Recep Erdogan, stirring up minorities and threatening yet more refugees heading west? Or Vladimir Putin, an ominous and looming presence on the north-eastern reaches of the Continent?

The EU seems beset by insoluble interlocking problems. Sadly, things can (probably) only get worse.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5006907/MARK-ALMOND-shock-elections-Germany-Austria.html#ixzz4wKZjcxjL
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

SOMEONE NEEDS TO HAVE A WORD WITH ANGELA MERKEL THAT!

'Empires have gone and most people in the world now live in Nation States.'

by Labour Peer [Peter] Lord Shore

in 2005

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1356-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED TOTALITARIAN EU

REWRITING HISTORY-BRUSSELS-STYLE

Monument to hubris: The lavish facade of the £47 million House of European History in Brussels

DAILY MAIL=REWRITING HISTORY-BRUSSELS STYLE by ROBERT HARDMAN

... play a pretty peripheral part in Europe's
 

rewriting of the European story here in the

 

heart of Brussels

Why does EU's new museum ignore Britain?

Saturday, October 14, 2017

 

The patronising, elitist hysteria of universities over being asked about Brexit will harden the views of millions who voted for it, writes

Chris Heaton-Harris, the Tory MP who caused outrage among university chiefs when he queried what they were saying about Brexit

When the mighty and powerful are questioned by those they consider unimportant, they are apt to squash their interrogators with disdain — especially if they have something to hide.

So it has proved with Chris Heaton-Harris, an obscure junior whip and Tory MP. 

A few weeks ago he wrote to universities asking for the names of professors ‘involved in the teaching of European affairs, with particular reference to Brexit’.

Heaton-Harris might be accused of naivety in asking such a question. But his short letter did not warrant a tidal wave of incredulous abuse. If he had asked which dons were conducting extra-marital affairs, he would have provoked less outrage. 

First to condemn him was Lord (Chris) Patten — ex-Tory minister, last Governor of Hong Kong and a former European Commissioner — who is now Chancellor of Oxford University. 

His lordship is a man for whom the word ‘panjandrum’ might have been invented: large, ponderous, pompous and more pleased with himself than he has a right to be. The Chinese called him ‘Fatty Pang’.

The fanatically pro-EU Patten swatted away the rather humble letter as ‘an extraordinary example of outrageous and foolish behaviour — offensive and idiotic Leninism’. He accused the unthreatening Tory MP of treating British universities like ‘Chinese re-education camps’.

Strong stuff since the first leader of Soviet Russia, Vladimir Lenin, killed tens of thousands of his political enemies, or threw them in concentration camps. Unassuming Heaton-Harris is evidently a modern version of this monster — as well as being stupid, of course.

Lord Patten, a product of Balliol College, Oxford, thinks he is very clever. But actually he is being the stupid one in conjuring up Lenin, and Chinese re-education camps, in response to a letter politely seeking information from public, taxpayer-funded institutions.

No, more likely, as a keen Brexiteer, he wanted to find out, albeit in a slightly clod-hopping way, how many young minds are being filled with anti-Brexit propaganda. 

Possibly he was trying to be provocative and already knew the answer — which is very many. 

We don’t need Heaton-Harris’s straightforward question, or the hysterical reaction to it, to conclude that the overwhelming majority of university dons are passionate Remainers.

One explanation for their strong pro-EU bias may be that many universities enjoy lavish grants from Brussels (the 24-strong Russell Group of leading universities receives £400million a year in research funds) which staff are frightened of losing.

According to a YouGov survey published in January, 81 per cent of professors and university lecturers voted Remain, whereas just 8 per cent voted Leave. I bet the latter keep their heads down over the coffee and croissants!

It’s probably a fair assumption that in most university political departments — where young student minds could be influenced if they are not already anti-Brexit — the proportion of convinced Remainers is even higher.

But these nice, fair-minded dons wouldn’t want to try to persuade anyone to their cause, would they? You bet they would! 

Lord Patten (left), the Chancellor of Oxford, accused Mr Heaton-Harris of treating universities like 'Chinese re-education camps', while Sally Hunt (right), chairwoman of the university lecturers’ union, said his request smacked of 'McCarthyism'

Before the referendum in June 2016, there were numerous stories that universities were urging their students to vote to stay in the EU.

Sir Ivor Roberts, then President of Trinity College, Oxford (and a former British Ambassador to Rome) was accused of exhorting his students to vote Remain, though he denied the charge.

Sir Steve Smith, Vice-Chancellor of Exeter University, wrote an email to all undergraduates encouraging them to recognise the ‘benefits’ that ‘membership of the EU can offer’.

At Warwick University, the Head of the School of Modern Languages, Sean Hand, used his faculty’s mailing list to send a pro-EU letter signed by academics to undergraduates, urging them to vote with ‘the free mobility of students and staff in mind’. 

In fact, these and other institutions were probably infringing Charity Commission guidelines which stated that universities must be politically neutral in the run-up to the referendum.

But what do they care? Before the referendum, Remainers expected to win. Following the (to them) shocking result, there’s evidence that anti-Brexit propaganda is being poured down the throats of students even more enthusiastically.

The University of York wrote on its website: ‘We are proud that York voted to remain in the EU. We are proud that that vote demonstrates a spirit of generosity and openness that our students experience on a daily basis.’

Meanwhile, the Master of Downing College, Cambridge, Professor Geoffrey Grimmett, used a graduation dinner last June to warn students how disastrous Brexit will be.

Examined in this light, Chris Heaton-Harris’s letter doesn’t seem to me at all outrageous (to use Fatty Pang’s own word). 

Universities are public institutions in receipt of huge sums of public money, and the public surely has a right to know what goes on behind their hallowed portals. 

And all the more so if what was determined by the referendum — a narrow but decisive majority in favour of leaving — isn’t remotely reflected by the nature of the debate in the universities. In truth, it’s pretty clear that on this issue there is little debate at all.

But then universities don’t reflect the country politically. Weeks before the 2015 General Election, a poll in the Times Higher Educational Supplement found that 46 per cent of lecturers planned to vote Labour, 22 per cent Green and 9 per cent Lib Dem. Only 11 per cent brave souls intended to vote Tory.

In other words, the political affiliations of university staff, as well as their views on Brexit, are wildly out of kilter with what the general public thinks. What should be done about it? I am certainly not in favour of censoring or threatening the universities, and I don’t imagine Heaton-Harris is either.

Yet given that universities are publicly-funded, it is surely reasonable that people, including MPs and journalists, should be able to ask questions about how these institutions portray current political issues without being smeared as ‘Leninist’ or ‘McCarthyite’.

What is so deeply depressing is that universities, which are supposed to be the cradle of fresh ideas and open debate, should be revealing themselves as narrow-minded and prescriptive.

And so a lone MP with very little power is dismissed and abused by arrogant representatives of elitist institutions which have a great deal of power, and are used to having everything their own way.

It was partly as a revolt against such patronising attitudes that so many less privileged Britons voted for Brexit.

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5018465/STEPHEN-GLOVER-hysteria-universities-Brexit.html#ixzz4wkIGXD5e
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[SELF-INTEREST IS THE GUIDING RULE OF THE MAJORITY OF REMAINERS. MANY HAVE NO LOVE FOR OUR COUNTRY  AND ENJOY THEIR REIGN OF OPPRESSION ON THOSE WHO  HAVE GIVEN THEM THEIR OPPORTUNITY TO WIDEN THEIR MINDS BUT HAVE INSTEAD DECIDED THEIR OPPORTUNITY SHOULD BE A LESSON IN BIGOTRY AND REVENGE-NOT TRUE LEARNING AND AN OPEN MIND BUT CONFRONTATION AND CLOSED MINDS TO A WIDER APPRECIATION OF ALL VIEWS WHICH ONLY FREE COMMENT CAN SUPPLY AND SUCCESSFULLY  AND OBJECTIVELY ANSWER.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 26,2017

 

H.F.1362

 

 

Revealed:

The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich ...in the EU

*

 

By Adam Lebor
Last updated at 10:30 PM on 09th May 2009

 

 

The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for 's post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis' return to power and work for a 'strong German empire'. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

 

Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with I. G. Farben

Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben

The three-page, closely typed report, marked 'Secret', copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany's economy by sending money through Switzerland.

They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire - but not just German.

The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.

The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of . The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War.

But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact.

Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.

Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?

The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 - and it paints an extraordinary picture.

The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.

 

Auschwitz

Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a factory run by German firm I. G. Farben

There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. 'It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.' Such defeatist talk was treasonous - enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo's cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.

But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to 'make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion'.

The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.

They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company.

But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.

Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich.

In stage one, the industrialists were to 'prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis', using the term for the French resistance.

Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a 'secure post-war foundation in foreign countries', while 'existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat'.

In stage three, German businesses would set up a 'sleeper' network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power.

'The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,' Bosse announced.

'Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.'

 

Enlarge   The 1944 Red House Report

Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing 'plans of German industrialists to engage in underground activity'

The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission.

The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.

Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.

Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence.

The Red House Report's author notes: 'Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence.

'Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party's plans for its post-war operations.'

The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter.

More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.

During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it.

A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.

He says: 'By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.'

Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.

As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.

A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad's gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility.

By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf's ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS's massive pan-European economic empire after Germany's defeat.

Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the transition to a post-war economy after Germany's defeat. This was dangerous, especially as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups.

But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service, protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS.

Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS's economic empire almost worthless.

The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to introduce a currency that would have any value.

That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency, Germany was once again an attractive trading partner.

The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires across Europe.

War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 - despite six years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments - the capital stock of assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the armaments boom.

Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered European continent. The answer was through supranationalism - the voluntary surrender of national sovereignty to an international body.

Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today.

But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists convicted of war crimes.

The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years.

Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death.

The Krupp company soon became one of Europe's leading industrial combines.

The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a fortune of more than $1billion, the equivalent of £400million at the time.

'For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,' says historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers.

'The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.'

Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the V1 rocket.

Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with the SS officers overseeing the camps.

Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany's most powerful banker, had prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of Deutsche Bank, Germany's biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded, Deutsche Bank enthusiastically 'Aryanised' Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were owned by Jews.

By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche Bank's wealth had quadrupled.

Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, as Deutsche Bank's representative. I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany's most powerful companies, formed out of a union of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties.

It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other prisoners died producing artificial rubber.

When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis' chilling term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent for which was owned by I.G. Farben.

But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben's bosses hedged their bets.

During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard's research. After the war, 24 I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III - but only twelve of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder.

Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany's post-war reconstruction. It was largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a 'strong German empire' was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today's European Union.

Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid - reconstruction funds - to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany's economic recovery.

Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.

Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are strikingly familiar today - on monetary integration and common transport, energy and welfare systems.

When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs was his most important financial adviser.

Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer.

That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and European Commission.

Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard Germany's first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as Chancellor for three years.

But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe - was built on mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by German companies in the Nazi era was

 2,700,000.

Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry.

A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer 5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any further legal action.

To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of £1.8billion.

Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory.

But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief, once said: 'In 50 years' time nobody will think of nation states.'

For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today's drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich - an economic rather than military imperium.

• The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor's thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is published by Reportage Press.

 

 

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

 

 

H.F.1290

 

[AT LAST! A VOICE THAT WAS SORELY NEEDED IN A TRUE DEMOCRACY.]

*

ABOLISH THE TOOTHLESS WATCHDOGS

 

 

If the Tories want to DEFEND THE MARKETS they MUST REFORM the USELESS REGULATORS that let AIRLINES and UTILITY GIANTS

TREAT US LIKE DIRT.

 

City Editor

Abolish the toothless watchdogs: If the Tories want to defend free markets they must reform the useless regulators that let airlines and utility giants treat us like dirt, writes ALEX BRUMMER

Who is the greatest villain in the utter shambles that is the collapse of Monarch?

The answer should be straightforward: the carrier that mired 860,000 passengers in chaos and misery.

In fact, the real culprits are the people you and I pay to safeguard us from such disasters, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

Its manifest failure to do so speaks volumes about the pathetic weakness of those tasked with regulating the private companies we all depend on for needs such as travel, heating, electricity, water and broadband.

These watchdogs are there to protect us from the kinds of horrors facing Monarch’s passengers. But repeatedly, they have been shown to be toothless.

When Dame Deirdre Hutton, the CAA’s chairman, announced with self-satisfied aplomb this week that Monarch’s passengers would be ‘repatriated’, it appeared initially that the regulator was doing its job.

Who is the greatest villain in the utter shambles that is the collapse of Monarch? The real culprits are the people you and I pay to safeguard us from such disasters, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA)

It had chartered more than 30 planes from carriers such as Qatar Airways and easyJet to help bring back 110,000 passengers stranded overseas.

In fact, this blanket rescue package will last a mere two weeks. Many people on longer breaks, including retired and elderly passengers, will need to pay to get home themselves.

Other victims of the collapse include package holidaymakers already in hotels who have paid for their rooms in advance through Monarch.

They face being hit by bills which the airline failed to pay.

Then there are hundreds of thousands more who have paid cash or dipped into savings for future bookings and face long struggles with credit card companies, PayPal and others to recover their money.

Yesterday, shockingly, the airline’s administrators KPMG estimated that as few as one in ten passengers could be protected financially by the Air Travel Organiser’s Licence (ATOL) — even though the CAA has suggested that up to half of passengers would be.

The truth is that Dame Deirdre, known as ‘Queen of the Quangos’ because of the series of high-level public sector posts she has held, gave the appearance of solving victims’ problems — but what they really wanted was for her to enforce discipline on the airlines she actually polices.

Because Monarch is not the only carrier that has let down passengers. Just last month, Ryanair dropped thousands of flights from its schedule in a move that affected around 750,000 passengers, and was accused of effectively ‘cancelling Christmas’. What did the watchdog do? Failed passengers again. And when computers at BA crashed during a May bank holiday weekend this year, causing cancellations, delays and misery, the authority was largely invisible.

In all of these cases, the supposed guardian of British passengers failed to champion the real victims.

There is no doubt: this regulator is not fit for purpose. Nor can it escape the fact that it bears considerable responsibility for Monarch passengers’ plight in the first place.

For it was the CAA that judged the company that bought Monarch in 2014 — a rapacious investment firm called Greybull Capital, which specialises in ‘rescuing’ ailing businesses — to be a fit and proper owner of an airline deserving of an Air Travel Organiser’s Licence.

Yet the most cursory glance at Greybull’s history — which includes ‘rescuing’ a number of firms, only to see them go into administration shortly afterwards — should have given the CAA pause for thought before granting it the licence.

It’s now all but impossible for the public to have faith in the CAA as a regulator on the side of passengers and consumers.

It often looks to be part of a cosy cartel more concerned with preserving the interests of the airline industry and airports than customers.

It has been helped in this by the fact that passengers see themselves as powerless.

Airline users tend to accept miserable service from carriers. They put up with poor website and phone experiences, rising charges for services such as baggage, delayed flights, short-notice cancellations, intrusive security and, in the case of Monarch, a collapsed carrier, as if these were an inevitable part of air travel.

A perusal of the CAA’s board members tells us a great deal about why they appear so unconnected to ordinary people. Dame Deirdre has one of the longest entries in Who’s Who and, among other things, has served as chairman of the National Consumer Council and the Food Standards Agency and deputy chairman of the useless Financial Services Authority in the run-up to the banking crisis of 2007.

But the CAA is no worse than most of the other regulators of utility businesses that daily affect our lives.

At the Conservative Party conference in Manchester, the Chancellor Philip Hammond and Business Secretary Greg Clark both delivered stirring denunciations of the Marxist nationalisation policies of Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party.

But even as ministers deliver their attacks on socialism, they seem to fail to understand the frustration of consumers treated like dirt by big utility companies. Consumers such as the commuters on strike-hit Southern Rail, and householders struggling with energy costs from privatised utilities that push up domestic bills even as wholesale prices fall.

More than three decades after Margaret Thatcher ushered in a free-market revolution by privatising British Gas, BT and the other former nationalised industries, consumers feel bitterly betrayed.

Yes, service is immeasurably better than it was all those decades ago, and there has been large-scale investment by the private sector which no government, struggling to keep public finances under control, could have afforded.

Then there are hundreds of thousands more who have paid cash or dipped into savings for future bookings and face long struggles with credit card companies, PayPal and others to recover their money

But these privatised companies today have increasingly little regard for their consumers. And this brings us back to the regulators.

Many are headed by quangocrats such as Dame Deirdre, remnants of the Blairite era, who do not have the muscle to stand up to the companies they police. The result is a loss of public confidence in capitalism to deliver the services people want at affordable prices.

Prime Minister Theresa May and her government have sought to deal with the perceived failures of the free market by fiddling with company boards — demanding more worker power, for instance, and more diversity, or by insisting on reining in excessive boardroom pay.

While this is laudable, it misses the point — because it concentrates its fire on the wrong kinds of company.

It is not the Tescos, Unilevers, Rolls-Royces, Vodafones, Glaxos and other listed companies that have alienated consumers, but the utilities.

Thames Water — where Dame Deirdre also happens to be a director — is one of the most despised companies in Britain, having flooded the nation’s rivers with raw sewage and failed to stem endless leaks.

Ofwat, the water regulator, has fined it millions of pounds, but this hardly registers against more than £1 billion it has sent overseas in shareholder cash dividends.

Likewise, the Rail Regulator has failed miserably to tackle Southern Rail’s disgusting performance in letting the unions interrupt commuter services, causing massive disruption and lost income.

If the Tories really want to defend free markets, they must show the willpower demonstrated by Margaret Thatcher in the Eighties when she took on the trade unions and won.

They could begin by replacing weak regulators with powerful industrialists willing to challenge the established order.

They must give regulators, including the CAA, greater powers to fine miscreants who overcharge or fail to deliver the right services. A toll of up to 10 per cent of a utility firm’s turnover would force bosses to mend their ways.

More muscular regulation would serve consumer and producer interests and demonstrate to voters that there is free-market alternative to the deadly hand of Marxism.


Read more
: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4946488/Abolish-toothless-watchdogs-writes-ALEX-BRUMMER.html#ixzz4uczQ8hay
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

56

View
comments

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1333-[THE UNACCEPTABLE FACE OF CAPITALISM  REARS IT'S HEAD YET AGAIN!]

Personal and Global Attacks Become Lethal: Is the Disclosure War

 Reaching a Climax? [Part I]

 

 

 

Unprecedented solar emissions. Huge wildfires smoking out the US. Massive earthquakes. Three different monster hurricanes that steered perfectly into Houston, Florida and Puerto Rico.

Damages to the already fragile US economy could easily exceed 1 trillion dollars -- at a time when there is nothing left to restore it with.

Within the UFO / Seeking Truth community, we saw the tragic deaths of Jim Marrs and William Tompkins -- as well as the possible attempted murders of Graham Hancock and David Wilcock, as we will discuss in Part Two.

David's insider 'Paul' had everything he owned stolen from him, as well as serious death threats. Pete Peterson's house has now been emptied to the bare walls and his trailers, packed with priceless classified items, are under imminent threat.

A massive, coordinated online attack against Corey Goode, including the destruction of his business and the expected loss of his children, was intended to lead to a fake, staged 'suicide', made believable by his overall anticipated collapse.

This all occurred shortly after Ancient Aliens, a top History Channel show, featured Corey Goode and William Tompkins' Secret Space Program testimony in an episode entitled "The Majestic Twelve", which aired on July 7, 2017.

So much has happened since our last update a month ago that it is difficult to summarize everything. Are these events interconnected? The answer definitely appears to be yes.

Since I am still on vacation, we will break this up into two different parts in order to not create any further delays. We will start by "following the money."

 

PART ONE: FOLLOW THE MONEY

 

WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE SECRET SPACE PROGRAM WERE REAL?

Let's begin our investigation with a mental exercise.

Even if you have trouble with the idea of a Secret Space Program, or SSP, being real, let's just imagine for a minute that it actually is true. 

What would happen to our society if we were given absolute proof that the testimonies of the late William Tompkins and others such as Corey Goode, as presented in the "Majestic Twelve" episode of Ancient Aliens, were completely authentic?

 

https://www.punkrockandufos.com/blog/2017/7/8/review-ancient-aliens-the-majestic-twelve-july-72017

The [MJ-12] episode also covers Project Horizon and other secret space bases, structures on Mars dubbed "ancient builder race" by astronauts, NASA hacks that say the MJ-12 and the space programs they helped start existed, Roswell and other UFO cases. 

 

What if we discovered that countless trillions of dollars of our money, since as early as the 1950s, have been spent on developing vastly superior technology to anything we see today?

What if the scope, depth and sophistication of this build-out is vastly bigger than most of us could even imagine -- and indeed extends throughout our solar system?

 

IMAGINE THE SCOPE OF WHAT COULD BE...

Let's just say that the insiders are right... and these convenient, quick-sounding labels of words like "billion" and "trillion" have been used to obscure how much stuff could really be manufactured with this much money.

What if this money financed antigravity craft, massive bases on Mars, the Moon and other satellites in our solar system and beyond -- some of which comfortably house hundreds of thousands of employees?

What if the full release of this technology would instantly propel us into a world of everyday space travel and interaction with countless different races of humanlike ETs? 

What if the Cabal that planned and financed all of this was still clinging to power on earth, but was now threatened with complete exposure to the public?

And... what if an Alliance within the military, intelligence and governments themselves is threatening this Cabal with complete exposure if they do not surrender -- and agree to tell us the truth?

That's the world that some of us are living in -- right on the front lines. This "shadow World War III" may very well be reaching a stunning conclusion in the near future.

 

IT IS ADMITTEDLY DIFFICULT TO FATHOM

The SSP narrative is so far removed from conventional reality that it seems almost impossible to imagine something like this ever becoming common, public knowledge.

However, anyone who has studied UFO lore has heard that the US government acquired craft with interstellar travel capabilities ever since the Roswell Crash of 1947. 

Furthermore, it is considered common knowledge that these craft were "reverse engineered," leading to working models being built out of them with our own technology.

It is commonly accepted by most open-minded investigators that such exotic aircraft have been tested in bases such as 'Area 51,' and are occasionally seen in our skies.

If we could cruise around our solar system within a few years after Roswell, that means our military-industrial complex has had nearly 70 years to establish manned bases out there.

The amount of money that has gone missing is vastly, vastly greater than what it would cost to build a fleet of reverse-engineered, advanced spacecraft.

 

THE PACKARD COMMISSION

I was an angst-ridden 12-year-old when the news about the Packard Commission came out in February 1986. It only made me even more convinced that our world was run by an evil Cabal.

This disclosure was extremely embarrassing to the military-industrial complex, as it revealed they were vastly overpaying for simple items like toilet seats -- on a massive scale.

This revelation likely came from the same Alliance faction that had just started pushing the Iran-Contra scandal through a few months earlier, as of August 20th, 1985.

As I discuss in The Ascension Mysteries, Iran-Contra was very likely intended to end the Cabal -- as it revealed treasonous collaboration with terrorists and cocaine dealers at the Presidential level.

By typing in "military hundred dollar toilet seats" into a search engine, it came up right away:

 

 

LET'S GO BACK TO THE ORIGINAL

Take a look at what we hear in the original article from the New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/1986/02/18/us/dept-of-hundred-dollar-toilet-seats.html?mcubz=3

Disclosures about the Defense Department paying hundreds of dollars for a hammer and hundreds more for a toilet seat have infuriated President Reagan, who has called the reports a ''constant drumbeat of propaganda'' and not typical of the way the Government operates.

But that ''propaganda,'' the President apparently forgot or did not know, originated with a commission on governmental efficiency for which he has been full of praise, the Grace Commission.

 

Reagan and his administration -- many of the same people who became known as "Neocons" and are implicated in 9/11 -- did not at all like these revelations.

Reagan attempted to defend them by calling this "propaganda" and acting as if it made him angry, rather than being interested in understanding why this was happening.

 

IT STARTS AS A JOKE...

In this next article from the LA Times on July 30, 1986, the reviewer makes a joke early along, only to reveal this is how the US military really worked:

http://articles.latimes.com/1986-07-30/news/vw-18804_1_nut

You may have read in the paper the other day that a division of Litton Industries and two of its former executives are accused of defrauding the government out of $6.3 million on military contracts.

According to the U.S. attorney, the company "grossly inflated prices intentionally" on about 45 contracts from 1975 to 1984.

It makes you wonder if all our weapons aren't overpriced....

 

A handy book for any taxpayer is "The Pentagon Catalog" (Workman), which describes and shows diagrams of numerous pieces of military hardware that authors Christopher Cerf and Henry Beard describe as "ordinary products at extraordinary prices."

They claim that their firm, Pentagon Products, can supply any of these items to anyone at the prices our military paid for them, and they boast, "We will not be oversold."

Anyone who buys this paperback for $4.95 gets a $2,043 nut free.

The nut is glued to the inside of the back cover, in the upper right hand corner, and fits in a hole in the pages, so it goes through to the front.

This nut, which is described as "a plain round nut," was made by McDonnell Douglas for the Navy at $2,043 each.

 

But, as the book points out, wouldn't it be embarrassing if some big piece of equipment failed because of a spare part that cost only a few cents? We certainly don't want to risk our airplanes by fitting them with cheap nuts.

The book also lists a claw hammer sold by Gould Simulation Systems to the Navy for $435. In the picture it looks like the kind you can buy at any hardware store for $10.

Comparatively reasonable is McDonnell Douglas' price of only $37 for a screw. It appears in every respect to be an ordinary screw, but the book points out:

"The fact is, a screw this expensive simply cannot get lost! How many times have you had a screw roll off your worktable and disappear, then just casually reached for another one because the missing fastener was too cheap to hunt for?

"Lots of times, right? Well, you can bet your bottom dollar . . . that if one of our screws rolls into some dark corner, you're going to conduct a full-scale search!"

 

Other items offered in the catalogue include:

  • a $285 screwdriver,
  • a $7,622 coffee maker,
  • a $387 flat washer,
  • a $469 wrench,
  • a $214 flashlight,
  • a $437 tape measure,
  • a $2,228 monkey wrench,
  • a $748 pair of duckbill pliers,
  • a $74,165 aluminum ladder,
  • a $659 ashtray and
  • a $240- million airplane.

 

Pentagon Products may be a fictional company, but these prices are not. They are documented.

 

IT STILL GOES ON TO THIS DAY

In 2015, we found out that a single helmet for a fighter jet was supposedly worth 400 thousand dollars:

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-u-s-government-is-spending-400000-dollars-on-a-single-helmet

Would you pay $400,000 for a single helmet?  Of course you wouldn’t – but that is precisely what the U.S. government is doing.

Just the helmet for the pilot of the new F-35 Lightning II is going to cost taxpayers nearly half a million dollars.  And since we are going to need 2,400 of those helmets, the total bill is going to end up approaching a billion dollars.  But what is a billion dollars between friends, eh?

Sadly, our military has a very long history of wasting money like this. Back in the 1980s, the “six hundred dollar toilet seat” became quite famous.

Average Americans were absolutely outraged that the government was wasting so much of our hard-earned money, and promises were made that things would change.

 

ONE JOURNALIST ALONE FOUND 33 BILLION IN MISSING MONEY

Then in 2016, an expose' from The Nation revealed even more examples in current times.

This journalist was able to track down 33 billion dollars in mysterious over-spending just on his own:

 

https://www.thenation.com/article/only-the-pentagon-could-spend-640-on-a-toilet-seat/

The latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.

Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars’ worth of weapons components that will never be used....

Keep in mind that the above examples are just the tip of the tip of a titanic iceberg of military waste.

In a recent report I did for the Center for International Policy, I identified 27 recent examples of such wasteful spending totaling over $33 billion. And that was no more than a sampling of everyday life in the 21st-century world of the Pentagon....

 

The first person to bring widespread public attention to the size and scope of the problem of Pentagon waste was Ernest Fitzgerald, an Air Force deputy for management systems.

In the late 1960s, he battled that service to bring to light massive cost overruns on Lockheed’s C-5A transport plane. He risked his job, and was ultimately fired, for uncovering $2 billion in excess expenditures on a plane [in late 1960s dollars]....

The C-5A fiasco, combined with Lockheed’s financial troubles with its L-1011 airliner project, led the company to approach Congress, hat in hand, for a $250 million government bailout....

In a time-tested lobbying technique that has been used by weapons makers ever since, Lockheed claimed that denying it loan guarantees would cost 34,000 jobs in 35 states, while undermining the Pentagon’s ability to prepare for the next war, whatever it might be.

The tactic worked like a charm....

 

By rewarding Lockheed Martin for its wasteful practices, Congress set a precedent that has never been superseded.

A present-day case in point is—speak of the devil—Lockheed Martin’s F-35 combat aircraft.

At $1.4 trillion in procurement and operating costs over its lifetime, it will be the most expensive weapons program ever undertaken by the Pentagon (or anyone else on planet Earth), and the warning signs are already in:

[There are] tens of billions of dollars in projected cost overruns and myriad performance problems before the F-35 is even out of its testing phase.

 

MASSIVE "PONZI SCHEMES" CREATED AS SECRET FUNDRAISERS FOR BLACK CASH

What if we learned that the US government created vast Ponzi schemes as fundraisers, where the actual costs of wars and the space race were much less than what was reported to the public?

[This is precisely what multiple insiders, who have proven their high-level credentials, have told us over the years. The Packard Commission was just a taste.]

What if these mega-fundraisers included the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Apollo moon missions, the trillion-dollar fighter jets, the nuclear arms race and now the War on Terror?

Take a look at some figures anyone can obtain via internet search:

 

 

8.8 TRILLION DOLLARS

If you add up just the above, in conventional dollars, you have 341B + 770B + 110B + 5.48T + 2.1T, for a total of 8,801 billion, or 8.8 trillion dollars.

Then throw in the absolutely ridiculous figure of 1.4 trillion for the F-35, and you are now up to 10.2 trillion dollars.

Multiple insiders have risked their lives to reveal that these methods are used as a way of funneling vast amounts of money into secret projects.

Some of this money was obviously spent legitimately on these programs -- but we are told that a significant majority of it was redirected elsewhere.

On a far more mundane level, when I was given a bribery and threat attempt on July 3rd, 2017, just four days before the MJ-12 episode aired, I was told I could sell something and be vastly overpaid for it.

I was told "This is how we do it. This is how we get money where it needs to go without it being anything easy to trace."

 

CONSIDER SOME OF THE THINGS THAT JUMP OUT IN THE ABOVE LINKS

Some of the articles we linked to above have some interesting facts worth exploring at this point.

Let's take a look at our first example, from the hyper-expensive nuclear weapons program:

 

http://www.nytimes.com/1998/07/01/us/us-nuclear-arms-cost-put-at-5.48-trillion.html

Nuclear weapons have cost the United States at least $5.48 trillion since 1940.

For most of that time neither Congress, the armed services nor the President had a clear idea what was being spent, according to a four-year study sponsored by the Brookings Institution....

The money spent on nuclear weapons, plus money for environmental cleanup, would buy 290 million automobiles, says an author of the study.

[The author's name is] William J. Weida, a professor of economics at Colorado College in Colorado Springs and a former director of the Economic Policy and Analysis division of the Defense Department.

 

5.48 TRILLION BUYS YOU 6800 NUKES

Just so we are clear, the current US population is about 324 million.

The money we have spent on nukes could buy a new car for almost every man, woman and child in America.

You could build an entire civilization for that kind of money.

How many nukes does the US now have to show for this astonishing 5.48 trillion-dollar expenditure? A mere 6,800 -- and better yet, only 1800 of them are deployed:

http://time.com/4893175/united-states-nuclear-weapons/

As of July 8, the United States has 6,800 warheads, according to data from Hans Kristensen and Robert Norris at the Federation of American scientists.

2,800 of them are retired, 4,000 are stockpiled, and 1,800 are deployed. The total number of U.S. warheads is second only to Russia, which currently has 7,000 of them.

 

That would mean that each missile would theoretically cost as much in pure economic value as the manufacture of 42 thousand, 647 different automobiles.

That would add up to a price of over 805 million dollars per missile -- a staggering number that approaches a billion dollars.

This is obviously approximate, but it at least puts us in the ballpark.

 

THERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL COSTS

Granted, you also need a delivery system in order to make a missile, as this New York Times article suggests:

the http://www.nytimes.com/1998/07/01/us/us-nuclear-arms-cost-put-at-5.48-trillion.html

The cost includes money spent to invent them and produce them, build the missiles, bombers and submarines to deliver them and to defend against enemy nuclear attacks.

 

In total, we have:

  • The amount of raw materials and labor involved in the invention of the technology;
  • the mining of fissile fuel, with appropriate equipment and safety precautions;
  • the refining and machining of the materials to make the missile;
  • the costs of manufacturing a portion of the plane or sub that would deliver one missile, and:
  • the labor involved in the construction of one missile.

 

This combined cost for one missile should certainly be less than what it takes to develop over 42 THOUSAND different automobiles.

Once you consider that these glorified rockets could be a lot cheaper than we are being told, everything starts to make a lot more sense.

 

WHAT THE HECK HAPPENED WITH APOLLO?

As this next quote reveals, Mercury cost 265 million per flight. Gemini cost 723 million per flight.

Yet, somehow, the price tag for each Apollo flight added up to 9,900 million bucks -- or 9.9 billion dollars each.

How is it that we could successfully launch over 37 Mercury flights for the same money it cost to do one Apollo flight?

Mercury put astronauts into orbit around the earth for the first time. Gemini again put them in earth orbit, but included longer trips and spacewalks.

Is it really 37 times more expensive to send astronauts to the moon than it is to launch them into earth's orbit and safely return them?

Here are the details if you want to read it for yourself:

 

http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1579/1

Project Mercury spanned five years (1959–1963) and cost $277 million in 1965 dollars, which translate into $1.6 billion in 2010 dollars.

Since six Mercury piloted missions were flown, that amounted to $265 million per flight in today’s money.

As for Gemini, the program costs $1.3 billion in 1967 dollars during its six-year lifespan (1962–1967).

In today’s money, it would amount to $7.3 billion, or $723 millions for each of its 10 piloted missions. We thus could say that a Gemini mission cost twice as much as a Mercury’s.

As reported above, the Apollo program costs $20.4 billion if we simply added yearly spending of its 15 year-lifespan (1959–1973), or $109 billion in today’s money.

Since 11 Apollo piloted missions were flown, that amounts to $9.9 billion per flight.

That’s way over Mercury and Gemini mission costs, reflecting the complexity of going to the Moon.

And if we consider these $109 billion resulted in six lunar landings, each of these missions costs some $18 billion!

 

START DOING THE NUMBERS

This writer naturally assumes the outrageously higher cost was simply due to "the complexity of going to the Moon" -- but multiple insiders have risked their lives to say there is much more to it than that.

Let's also not forget that each Mercury mission required a rocket to be launched. Just like a nuclear missile, which is also a rocket.

Nonetheless, a Mercury rocket only cost 265 million per flight, whereas a nuclear rocket supposedly costs over 805 million per unit -- as we said above.

Once you get the basic design perfected, and know where to mine the fissile materials, should it really cost so much more to produce a nuke?

 

NUMBERS ARE CONVENIENT LABELS THAT CAN HIDE THE TRUTH

Numbers like "million," "billion" and "trillion" get thrown around all the time, but do we really understand exactly how much we can build with this kind of money?

Most people have no idea. None whatsoever. This is the result of generations of mass-media brainwashing.

The numbers give us convenient labels to file everything away under a short sub-heading in our minds.

How many people could really even imagine the difference between having and spending 10 million, 100 million, 1000 million or 1,000,000 million?

Yet, this all-too-easily ignored figure of a trillion dollars is literally, again, one million, million dollars.

 

YOU WOULD PROBABLY RUN OUT OF IDEAS

Let's say you were lucky enough to get handed a trillion dollars. The only catch was that you actually had to spend it.

If you tried to spend one million, million dollars, you would probably run out of ideas pretty quickly after the first few million -- perhaps 100M at the most.

"Nonsense, David, I'd start making hundred million-dollar movies!" Okay, great idea. Go "all in" at 100M per movie. Make it big.

In order to spend a trillion dollars you would need to personally produce ten thousand  of these Hollywood blockbusters.

If you could read and approve a 120-page script a day, every day of your life, it would take you 27.39 years to get through ten thousand of them.

Each of these films requires tens of thousands of highly skilled employees to work full time for several months at least.

Right now we are lucky to see ten movies of that caliber and price point per year, maybe 20 if you are very generous.

The amount of time and effort it would take to train enough people to even make, say, 50 films of this size and cost per year is astronomical.

It would take you 500 years at our current production speed to spend a trillion dollars by making 20 major blockbusters at 100M each per year.

 

DON'T FORGET THE MISSING MONEY

Now we are starting to get a better sense of exactly how big a trillion dollars is. If Hollywood made 20 films at 100M each per year, it would take them 500 years to burn through a trillion dollars.

Each film requires the labor of armies of tens of thousands of people, extensive materials costs to build sets and props, and tons of computer power and time.

Our back-of-the-envelope calculation for the on-the-books costs of Korea, Vietnam, Apollo, the nuclear arms race, the F-35 and the War on Terror was 10.2 trillion dollars.

[UPDATE: That's over 5000 years of hiring huge armies of people to make 20 top blockbuster films per year, at 100M per movie.

Not to mention technical breakthroughs would probably bring the costs way down and allow you to make many more at the same price.]

This doesn't even begin to cover the money that is just flat-out missing.

What if US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced that 2.3 trillion dollars was "missing" from the US defense budget on the day before 9/11?

What if the total amount of "missing" money, in addition to the 10.2 trillion already mentioned and other fundraising methods, is now 6.5 trillion dollars as of August 2016?

 

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/6-5-trillion-missing-from-defense-department/

 

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/6-5-trillion-missing-from-defense-department/

A relatively obscure audit report from the Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Defense suddenly is getting a lot of attention for what it apparently reveals: The Pentagon can’t account for $6.5 trillion.

At ArmstrongEconomics, the blog reported, “Once again, the office of inspector general has come up with a huge hole in the Department of Defense with a missing $6.5 trillion.”

The day before 9/11, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld admitted $2.3 trillion was missing from the Defense Department budget, noted the blog.

That figure has now grown to $6.5 trillion and counting.

 

LOTS AND LOTS OF MONEY SPENT

Now we've looked at 10.2 trillion spent on a handful of wars, a fighter jet and a space program with six moonwalks, and another 6.5 trillion that is "missing."

The US military budget has been approaching a trillion dollars a year in total spending for the last decade, as you can see here -- even though we went through a crippling financial crisis in 2008.

The numbers in this diagram are in billions:

 

 

FOUR TIMES HIGHER THAN CHINA, TEN TIMES HIGHER THAN RUSSIA

For all the fear-mongering we hear in the media about China and Russia, the article that features this budget breakdown also shows how absurdly high this figure really is:

https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-military-budget-components-challenges-growth-3306320

U.S. military spending is its largest expenditure after Social Security benefits. It's greater than those of the next 10 largest government expenditures combined.

It's four times more than China's military budget of $216 billion. It's almost 10 times bigger than Russia's budget of just $84.5 billion.

It's difficult to reduce the budget deficit, and the almost $20 trillion debt, without cutting defense spending.

 

We are being told by the media that Russia is this terrifying adversary, as if the Cold War is back on again. Yet the US has ten times more military cash than they do.

China is supposed to be an even bigger and scarier villain. The US has 400 percent more military spending than they do.

What the heck is going on here?

 

WHERE DID ALL THE MONEY GO?

The entire world is teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. All the money is gone. The US alone is nearly 20 trillion dollars in debt, as you just read.

The Cabal's own "Too Big to Fail" mega-corporate banks didn't have anything left in 2008, and needed a 29 trillion-dollar bailout, as we revealed in Financial Tyranny.

Yet, in practical terms, this makes no sense. All that money had to go somewhere. 29 trillion is nearly half of the entire wealth of the planet in a given year, as measured in world GDP.

If you play "follow the money," the obvious answer to the problem is that they had to spend it on something.

 

WHAT COULD THEY HAVE BOUGHT?

If we assume that wealthy elites stole this money and spent it, what could they have bought with it?

You may have imagined them dining on caviar and fine steak, washing it down with a 400-dollar bottle of Dom Perignon champagne on their private jets.

They might have fleets of Bentleys waiting in the garages of a few different mega-mansions around the world, and towering yachts in the harbor.

The costs of these luxuries are much less than the ten trillion in assets held by the top 92,000 people, who represent the .001%.

If each one of them had exactly the same amount of money, which is highly unlikely, it would amount to 108 million, 698 thousand dollars and change.

A private jet 'only' costs a maximum of 4 million a year.

 

 

Sprawling mansions owned by the top celebrities typically weigh in at 10 to 20 million. The most expensive cars still only cost 1/10th of a million, except for certain very rare examples.

 

YOU COULD DO DAMAGE WITH A YACHT

Yachts are where things can get ridiculous.

There aren't enough super-yachts for all 92,000 of the 0.001 percent to have one, but if there were, they could spend all they have trying to get one and go broke, since they are 275M each.

 

 

Forbes was only able to identify 125 super-yacht owners enough to know their nationalities, though they also say 355 of them were sold in 2013, totaling 3.5 billion.

How many super-yachts at 275 million could you buy with ten trillion dollars? That's 36 thousand, 363 -- vastly greater than the number known to exist.

 

ENOUGH MONEY TO BUILD ENTIRE CITIES... IF NOT ENTIRE NATIONS

The top 92,000 individuals alone possess 10 trillion. However, the total number socked away by the super-rich is as much as a staggering 32 trillion dollars:

http://www.alternet.org/economy/global-power-elite-exposed

In July of 2012, James Henry, a former chief economist at McKinsey, a major global consultancy, published a major report on tax havens for the Tax Justice Network. 

[He] compiled data from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the IMF and other private sector entities to reveal that the world’s super-rich have hidden between $21 and $32 trillion offshore to avoid taxation....

With roughly half of the world’s offshore wealth, or some $10 trillion, belonging to 92,000 of the planet's richest individuals — representing not the top 1% but the top 0.001% — we see a far more extreme global disparity taking shape than the one invoked by the Occupy movement.

 

LOOK AT THE NUMBERS

Now let's take a look at the combined wealth of entire nations as it stands today in 2017, based on GDP, or Gross Domestic Product.

What you are seeing here is that the total value of the US is 19.4 trillion, China is 11.7 trillion, Japan is 4.8 trillion, and so on:

 

https://knoema.com/nwnfkne/world-gdp-ranking-2017-gdp-by-country-data-and-charts

 

Everyone is talking about how wealthy China is. They are buying up everything in sight, going through a massive construction boom, you name it.

Yet, as you can see here, their combined GDP for 2017 is $11.79 trillion.

This is just a bit higher than what the top 92,000 people have stuffed under the couch.

How much could you actually do with 11.79 trillion? Let's take a quick look at China and find out.

 

CHINA'S "GHOST CITIES"

Just some of China's 11.79 trillion per year has been allocated to the construction of utterly vast, creepy "Ghost Cities" that no one is even living in.

Here is one article about this from the February 2016 issue of Wired Magazine, complete with stunning photographic documentation:

 

https://www.wired.com/2016/02/kai-caemmerer-unborn-cities/

 

https://www.wired.com/2016/02/kai-caemmerer-unborn-cities/

The Kangbashi district of Ordos, China is a marvel of urban planning, 137-square miles of shining towers, futuristic architecture and pristine parks carved out of the grassland of Inner Mongolia.

It is a thoroughly modern city, but for one thing: No one lives there.

Well, almost nobody. Kangbashi is one of hundreds of sparkling new cities sitting relatively empty throughout China.

[They have been] built by a government eager to urbanize the country but shunned by people unable to afford it or hesitant to leave the rural communities they know.

Chicago photographer Kai Caemmerer visited Kangbashi and two other cities for his ongoing series Unborn Cities.

The photos capture the eerie sensation of standing on a silent street surrounded by empty skyscrapers and public spaces devoid of life.

 

2017: CHINA NOW BUILDING A GHOST CITY THREE TIMES THE SIZE OF NEW YORK

In April 2017, China announced the construction of yet another city, which would soon expand to literally being three times the size of New York:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/04/china-plans-build-new-city-nearly-three-times-the-size-of-new-york

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/04/china-plans-build-new-city-nearly-three-times-the-size-of-new-york

Plans for the Xiongan New Area, a special economic zone that authorities say will eventually cover an area nearly three times that of New York, were announced by the Communist party’s top leaders on Saturday with a flurry of government propaganda....

Official news agency Xinhua said Xiongan’s creation would reduce pressure on China’s car-clogged, 22 million-resident capital, and “usher in a new chapter in the country’s historic transitioning to coordinated, inclusive and sustainable growth”....

China has created dozens of “new areas” in recent years as part of a massive urbanisation drive that has seen hundreds of millions of people pour into its cities.

Critics say many have become ghost towns but in a recent interview Wade Shepard, the author of a book on the phenomenon, said some were now beginning to take off.

 

CHINA IS NOW PLANNING ON BUILDING ANOTHER 285 NEW CITIES

Even though China already has a total of 650 established cities, they intend to use part of this 11.79 trillion per year to build an additional 285 of them.

This, of course, means that one of the most highly populated countries in the world is literally about to double the size of their cities with the money they already have.

11.79 trillion per year is more than enough to do this:

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2017/09/01/no-joke-china-is-building-285-eco-cities-heres-why

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2017/09/01/no-joke-china-is-building-285-eco-cities-heres-why

Two hundred and eighty-five. That’s the number of new purpose-built eco-cities that China claims to be developing.

This is not a joke or an ironic jest... This is a very real development that is taking place in a China that is attempting to rapidly transition and stabilize on many fronts...

In a country that has roughly 650 established cities, the impact of this eco-city building bonanza could be drastic — even if only a modest portion of them are ever actually completed and populated....

This is a country that has urbanized faster and more extensively than any other country in history — by far.

Since 1949, when the Communist Party first came to power, China created (or designated) over 600 new cities.

In the past three decades alone, the country has urbanized more people than the entire population of the United States. 

By 2030, [China] expects to have over a billion urban dwellers — which means an Estonia-size population chunk is going to have to urbanize each month (yes, month).

 

Remember -- all of these expenses are in excess of China's yearly military budget of 216 billion, which is only 0.2 trillion dollars.

 

SO HOW MUCH EXACTLY IS TEN TRILLION?

Now maybe you have a better idea of what it means when 92,000 people have socked away ten trillion dollars.

Forget about 92,000 private jets, five mansions per person, five Bentleys per person, and so on.

Look at what China is doing with a similar amount of money in any given year.

We are literally talking about enough money for the .001 percent to build entire countries -- entire civilizations -- if they had the land and raw materials to do so. 

And that may well be the point.

The hidden cities we are looking for do indeed exist, according to brave insiders -- one of whom just died at a very suspicious time.

The cities are either underground or off-planet. It is as simple as that.

Yet, for some reason, the idea that we have been lied to about something this massive in size seems to defy people's emotional threshold completely.

 

TELLING THE BIG LIE

Adolf Hitler spoke about the value of telling a "big lie" in Mein Kampf, and this idea should be kept at the forefront of our awareness as we survey this concept.

This quote comes from the Jewish Virtual Library website, where it is presented for our consideration. I have bolded certain passages for emphasis:

 

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/excerpts-from-mein-kampf

In the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily.

And thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.

It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.

Even though the facts which prove this [colossal lie] to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.

For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.    -- Adolf Hitler

 

THINK ABOUT THE BIG LIE AS IT MAY EXIST TODAY

You've just read a quote from Hitler's manifesto that precisely explains what is going on right now. It has often been shortened and paraphrased.

Simply put, if the Powers that Were tell a big enough lie, most people simply could not believe that it could be true.

The people have, as he put it, "primitive simplicity in their minds" where they could never handle telling such a "colossal untruth" within their own personal lives.

For this same reason, they couldn't imagine anyone else telling a lie of such colossal magnitude either.

Even when the "broad masses of a nation" see irrefutable evidence that this "big lie" is real, "they will still doubt and waver... and think that there may be some other explanation."

Cue the invariable cry of the skeptic:

"That would never happen to ME! I am Highly Intelligent! There Is No Scientific Evidence! You Have a Huge Ego and Are Writing This Only to Make Money!"

Yep. So why don't you stop reading and go do something else? Don't waste one precious minute of your resources on something you know is not true.

 

HEADING INTO PART TWO

In conclusion, we have shown ample evidence of awesome military over-spending, documented for generations now.

China has just over half the yearly GDP of the US, and yet they are on a building spree unlike anything the world has ever seen.

My point is simple: All the tools are there to see that the military-industrial complex, or MIC, could be experiencing an even bigger construction binge.

Opulent cities large enough to house millions of people can be built, and have been built, with that level of cash. We just haven't been allowed to see them. Yet.

On the face of it, you might think the idea of a Secret Space Program is ridiculous.

However, there is no denying that powerful people are trying to assassinate Corey Goode and me both -- as well as others in our field.

 

LET'S TAKE A QUICK LOOK

Just after I wrote the last article, William Tompkins died -- and he was our valuable eyewitness to the US's discovery of the Nazi SSP in WWII.

He revealed that the Nazis had cut a deal with sinister reptilian ETs many insiders call the Draco.

They were also called "Saurian Men," and were described with the code name "S-M" by insiders who wrote notes on Carlos Allende's copy of Morris K. Jessup's "The Case for the UFO."

Read this article on Mysterious Universe to get a good overview of this very strange 'leak' from the MIC that emerged back in 1957, as notes added to Jessup's book.

Tompkins also was instrumental in designing prototypes for massive "space submarines" that became part of the Solar Warden program Corey was involved in.

Even stranger was that Bill died just hours before the total solar eclipse -- which is in keeping with the Cabal's method of doing ceremonial assassinations.

Graham Hancock nearly died the week before, as we will discuss. This happened within days of when the brakes went out on my car.

Graham is the world's leading expert on ancient civilizations, and has already linked the Giza monuments to what we see on Mars in The Mars Mystery.

 

 

PETE PETERSON HAS TAKEN A REALLY HARD HIT... AND SO HAS 'PAUL'

Pete Peterson recently validated much of Goode and Tompkins on Cosmic Disclosure. This is a show I host on Gaia, the "Netflix of Seeking Truth."

The corroboration of their testimonies is absolutely stunning. This goes far, far beyond the possibility of anyone creating such an interconnected set of lies.

You can go here and see all 8000-plus titles on Gaia, pay only 99 cents for the first month, and cancel without penalty if you don't like it.

When we last checked in, Pete was under threat of having everything stolen. Day after day we have watched this continue. Nothing has been able to stop it.

Pete has now had his house emptied to the bare walls by agents of the bank. The current sheriff has nothing to do with this operation and is innocent.

My insider friend 'Paul,' who personally autopsied about 2000 different types of ET corpses, and had been working closely with me, also lost everything he owned.

This event occurred only three days after I leaked his new testimony about the "Zombie Program," using advanced cloning technology, on August 14th.

More on this in Part Two. They even left a bullet on the countertop in an otherwise emptied-out house to send him a message.

They drilled holes all over the place in his walls to find possible secrets hidden in there -- and did in fact get a box containing priceless computer files.

 

THIS STORY IS EVOLVING BY THE DAY

The point is, someone absolutely does not want us doing what we are doing.

I recommend reading all three of the previous updates to really understand the scope and depth of this story, if you haven't already done so:

 

UPDATE ONE: Why David Needed a Time-Out

UPDATE TWO: David's Brakes Sabotaged

UPDATE THREE: Dark Alliance Mega-Attack Repelled... For Now

 

Graham Hancock's brush with death happened at exactly the same time that Pete's house started to be emptied out -- just days after the brakes went out on my car.

Tompkins died almost immediately after I wrote Update Three -- just hours before a total solar eclipse over America.

Jim Marrs, the world's leading JFK expert, had died not that long before all these events started.

Corey Goode has just navigated another very serious threat while he was in Spain, which we may or may not even be authorized to discuss in any detail.

 

THANKS AGAIN FOR HELPING PETE -- HE NEEDS IT

You stepped up marvelously to help Pete rebuild from this devastating loss, for which I greatly appreciate your help.

So far we have raised over 53 thousand dollars to help him rebuild. This was a stunning demonstration of public support:

 

 

Pete will be making a public statement thanking you for your amazing generosity in the near future. I will probably bring him on the radio.

He is using the money to finance the construction of a new lab, so his valuable technical work can continue forward.

The bank has now stolen and destroyed over 2 million dollars worth of belongings for a house that was only worth about 300K.

They have completely broken the law by failing to move the items to a storage facility that we could then reimburse them for, and recover the valuables.

The items have been thrown in the dump, driven over by bulldozers, and then covered with wet garbage, followed by dry garbage, so they can never be found.

We are trying to file motions to have this elevated to a criminal charge and I will keep you posted.

 

MORE TO COME SOON

Given the active threat I and others now face, I don't expect to wait that long to write Part Two. Stay tuned.

Despite the level of threat going on, I am very excited about the possibility that this could mean disclosure is imminent -- and will be much bigger than we thought.

 

UPDATE, 2.5 HOURS LATER: NUMERICAL SYNCHRONICITY... AGAIN

I just came back here to make a final round of editorial tweaks. I uploaded them, refreshed the page, and bam -- 6066 views.

The "666" obviously is the number from the Book of Revelation regarding the Antichrist.

What we are seeing in this investigation matches the Bible prophecies very nicely.

 

 

As I have said many times, this happens without any conscious effort.

It continues to be an indication that positive forces out there have our backs.

There is much more to share in Part Two.

The Cabal is obviously very vulnerable right now if they are conducting so many obvious acts of desperation.

Things have gotten really serious with the acceleration of earth changes. This is a call for each one of us to step up and defend ourselves and our planet.

 

ANOTHER ONE

I posted this update, re-read the whole article from the beginning, got to the end and hit Refresh. Boom -- there it was again! 7770.

 

 

I've always seen 777 as a nice counter-balance to 666 in numerology so this was particularly significant to me. No effort required -- it just works.

Let's just say that if all the dreams and briefings are real, we could soon be in for the most astonishing "mass awakening" in recorded history.

 

 
Hits: 93,109
 
You might enjoy:
ad
Unknown
 

Where Are You? evokes some of the great 70s bands like Styx and Rush. In fact, David, youre a ringer for Geddy Lee, the lead singer of Rush. (Everyone listen to Working Man and youll know exactly what I mean!)

Comments (106)   

 

H.F.1332

by Benjamin Fulford

Another Letter to the Editor About the Jews

Hello, Benjamin,

It is funny reading how the JEWS do not like being criticized for being JEWS.

No, it’s not the Khazarians, it’s the F-ing JEWS that are destroying the world.

I don’t buy into the “good Jews” and “bad Jews” argument.  Those that do not wish to go along with the JEWISH SH#T SCUM in the world should act accordingly and stop calling themselves JEWISH.

Of course you will not have the guts to print this because you are part of the system.

JEWS are a cancer upon this world.  Any group that has been shunned from every country on Earth for over 2,000 years should by now realise that they are doing something wrong.

We need to call it like it is:  IT IS THE JEWS THAT ARE HELL-BENT ON DESTROYING THE WORLD.  HELL-BENT IS A VERY GOOD PHRASE TO USE BECAUSE IT IS SATAN WHO IS THEIR GOD AND IS WHO THEY SERVE. That is the truth.  The JEWS do not want the truth to be known.

What are you going to do, Benjamin?  Are you going to tell the truth, or are you going to continue to hide behind this Khazarian lie?

Even if you do not print this, I would like you to reply.  What I have said is the truth!  Are you going to run and hide, or are you going to tell the truth?

Regards

 

Hello,

First of all, I do not consider myself to be Jewish.  I am a human being from the planet earth—that is all.  I simply point out that according to their definition, I am one of them.

I think the Jews are like the matador’s red cape used in bullfights.  They distract us from the real enemy who is, as you point out, the Satanists.  A lot of Satanists pretend to be Jews, but most Jews are not Satanists.

I have and continue to risk my life to fight against the Satanists, but at the same time, so as not to become like them, I refuse to attack innocent people, whatever ethnic group they identify with.

However, the Jews do need to join the fight against the Satanists.  They also need to renounce many of the horrific things written in the Talmud such as this:  “Even the best of the ‘goyim’ should all be killed.”  (Soferim 15)

Benjamin Fulford

Emergency Alert

Murderer and drug dealer Richard Armitage and criminal Michael Green (berg) will be at the Teikoku Hotel in Tokyo, Japan between 8:30 and 13:15 on Friday, October 27th, 2017.
http://www.nikkei-events.jp/csis/

Richard Armitage has been responsible for the murder and torture of Japanese prime ministers, according to my sources.  He has also been named by CIA and other sources as a drug dealer and a traitor who contributed greatly to the U.S. loss in the Vietnam War.  He will be wearing a bulletproof vest at the event because he has created many enemies with his crimes.

Michael Green told Japanese gangsters that I was a woman-beating amphetamine addict and paid them to kill me, according to these gangsters.  He employs Japanese gangsters to terrorize the Japanese political and financial establishment.

These men engineered the theft of the Japanese election that took place on October 22, 2017, and now their puppets like Shinzo Abe are calling for war with North Korea according to the agenda of their Zionist masters.

Message to Admiral Harry Harris:  If you do not order military police to arrest these traitors and criminals, you yourself will ultimately face court martial and imprisonment for neglect of duty.

These men must be arrested, and if they resist arrest, all necessary force must be used.  Arresting these men could be the game-changer that finally liberates humanity from Khazarian mob terror.

We will offer a bounty of 1 ton of gold deliverable in Hong Kong for the arrest of these criminals.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

緊急報告:
リチャード・アーミタジとミカエル・グリーンは2017年10月27日の8時30分から13時15分の間に帝国ホテルで登場する予定です。
多くの情報源によるとアーミタジは殺人犯や麻薬犯である。またアーミタジは多くの日本の総理大臣の殺戮に加担したと情報源らが言う。彼の逮捕は急務である。
ミカエル・グリーンは日本の多くの暴力団と関係を持っている。彼が日本のとても危険な連中に僕は女に暴力を振るう覚せい剤中毒者だと言う嘘を付いて僕の殺人を依頼した。彼の逮捕も急務である。
彼らが10月22日の総選挙泥簿をして、今家来安部政権に北朝鮮との戦争を始めさせようとしている。この二人を束縛すれば日本は再び独立国家になれる。
皆さん27日に帝国ホテルで集合してください。勝負をつけましょう。

Past Presidents of Bankrupt U.S. Corporation Go on “Beg-athon” for Godfather Bush

The dragnet is slowly but inexorably closing in on the Bush/Clinton (Scherf/ Rockefeller) Khazarian mafia clan and their Federal Reserve Board printing press.  Multiple legal investigations, mass arrests of junior Khazarian mobsters, and public disclosure are now part of regular public discourse, and not just on blogs formerly maligned as “conspiracy” sites.

An interesting sign of the Khazarians’ desperation was the spectacle of George Bush Senior posing with four other former presidents (minus Donald Trump) of the United States Corporation as part of a “beg-athon.”
http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/356605-photo-of-lady-gaga-and-five-former-presidents-goes-viral

First, we must note that with computer graphics and body doubles it is hard to know if this event really took place.  For example, multiple sources have told this writer that Bill Clinton (Rockefeller) died of AIDS early this year.

Nonetheless, assuming this event did really take place, this is what a senior CIA source in Texas had to say about it:

“The ‘beg-athon’ in Texas is pure BS.  Notice that the money goes through the George H.W. Bush (Scherf) Foundation.  They are scamming money any way they can get it.  The Khazarian mafia cabal must be really desperate.”

The causes of their desperation have been snowballing in recent weeks.  Perhaps most deadly have been the ongoing disclosures about Khazarian genocides.  This has started with the release of documents showing that the U.S. government was involved in the murder of over 500,000 Indonesians in the mid-1960s.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/10/18/documents-reveal-active-us-support-indonesian-mass-killings-1960s

The Texas-based CIA source admits, “We removed [Indonesian President] Soekarno from power, and we put Soeharto into power.”  He regrets that he was a part of the operation back them.  His excuse:  just doing what he was ordered to do by his boss at Langley.

President Donald Trump promised more disclosure in the following tweet, saying, “Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President, the long blocked and classified JFK files to be opened.”

Three separate sources—one NSA, one Pentagon, and one CIA—all said they did not believe Trump would release the real truth about the Kennedy assassination.

However, one senior Pentagon source who has been consistently reliable in the past said that “The Trump release of JFK files may implicate Bush Senior, Mossad, the CIA, and the deep state, and may be a prelude to an intel dump on 9/11, suppressed technology, the secret space program, and other disclosures prior to mass arrests.”

Long-term readers of this blog already know that JFK was assassinated because he was trying, using gold provided by Soekarno, to take control of the issuance of U.S. dollars away from the privately-owned Federal Reserve Board (FRB).

Pentagon sources are saying that in any case, “Khazarian control of the FRB is kaput, as Fed Governor Jerome (Jay) Powell may be chosen as the next FRB, beating the three Jews Gary Cohn, Janet Yellen, and Kevin Warsh, who is son-in-law of billionaire 9/11 conspirator and Israeli asset Ron Lauder….  Stanford PhD economist John Taylor may also be named to the FRB as Vice Chairman or Governor.”

The source continues by noting, “When the global currency reset happens, the FRB may be folded into [the U.S.] Treasury [Department] and issue gold-backed United States Notes (USN).

The Texas CIA source, who claims to hate Bush Senior but appears to be closely connected to him, says the Khazarian mafia was ready retaliate by taking drastic action, warning that “The entire Internet has a back door installed and the Khazarian mafia can and will
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Letter to the Editor – A Note on “Jewishness” and Zionism

Hello Ben,

I read the complaint of the individual objecting to your use of the term “Jewish” in your description of events last week.  There is, I think, reason to differentiate carefully between the term “Jewish mafia” and the Italian Mafia.  They are not necessarily correct analogs.

In the case of Jewish people, one awful risk they face, which apparently is largely unseen by many of them, is the Zionists.  The Zionists are the Jewish mafia, and it is apparent to me that they are hiding behind the Jewish religion as a front for their activities.

This places Jewish people in a terrible position of “shield.”  And in order for an entire people to serve as that shield, they often express strong belief in support of the Zionists, apparently not understanding that in no way does Zionism serve the Jewish religion.  I don’t think Italians have anywhere near this level of identification with their captors.

Just a thought.  As a friend to all people, I find this situation very aggravating, as any negative criticism of Zionism very often incites attacks decrying “anti-Semitism.”  (As you pointed out, a misnomer.)  Actually, most people identifying with Judaism today have nothing to do with Semites.  They’re effectively Khazarians filtered through European bloodlines.

Possible Upcoming False Flags, Crisis Actor Recruitment

Information contributed by readers:

The pizzagate investigators at Voat found something really suspicious on Twitter:
Recruitment for crisis actors for a disaster event scheduled for 10/31-11/2 in Oklahoma City.
http://work4hds.com/apply/

Also, a suspicious Craigslist ad related to the planned action by Antifa on 11/4.  Orangeburg area:
https://columbia.craigslist.org/gov/d/need-people-for-role-players/6351154067.html

 

H.F.1360

 
 
Quentin Letts 

-Yesterday in Parliament.

[1295 -1972 -A FREE NATION-THEN   

(CAPTIVITY WITHIN THE NAZI PLANNED FOURTH REICH)-

March 16 - 2017 ...]

 

Dear EU,

DAILY MAIL-Quentin Letts-Dear EU, we're off now, love from the people of the UK

LACKLUSTRE exchanges between the Leader of the House and his Shadow were interupted by the Speaker, John Bercow. He had an announcement to savour.

The hour, by the Commons digital clock, was 10.46 and 16 seconds.

'Order, Just before we proceed with the Business Question I have to notify the house, in accordance with the

ROYAL ASSENT ACT 1967

that Her Majesty has signified

HER ROYAL ASSENT

to the following Acts...

The Remain-voting Speaker continued, with apparent boredom:

'Supply and Appropriation (Anticipation and Adjustments) Act 2017;

EUROPEAN UNION

(NOTIFICATION OF WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2017.

 

Full article

 

[COMMENT S IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1149 FREEDOM -FULL STEAM AHEAD!

 were off now, love from the people of the UK.

*  *  *

 

WHERE DID SHE GET THE HAT?

A DAY TO REMEMBER

We saw MRS May in her new head apparel we became aware that the spirit of an IRON LADY was again alive in our Brittanic land.

As in the past, when it was necessay to protect her own, in PEACE and WAR

then Britania would again Rule the Waves to protect HER OWN wherever THEY MAY BE.

AS in the recent past we are again in a BATTLE to recover our PAST.

WE face a time of UNCERTAINTY yet our HISTORY has shown on many occasions that even a TEMPORY SET-BACK leads inevitably to VICTORY.

We have been many times in our LONG HISTORY experienced the THREAT from across the soon to be returned ENGLISH CHANNEL which has as in the days when we had a WOODEN WALL protecting our then FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the days of ALFRED the GREAT through the ELISABETHAN TIME and from a number of attempted INVASIONS since.

But we must REMEMBER that our OWN PARLIAMENT allowed our GREATEST ENEMY GERMANY who after we had suffered TWO WORLD WARS from HER HANDS permitted our FREE NATION STATE in 1972 to sign an ACT of SURRENDER we would call it TREASON which will be finally ERADICATED from our COMMONS JOURNAL within the NEXT FEW DAYS.

At this crucial time in our NATIONS HISTORY we  must remember WHO WE ARE and WHAT WE ARE as a PEOPLE and the message from the past from the TIME of the HEROIC ALFRED the GREAT to the REIGN of our QUEEN BESS- ELISABETH THE FIRST of ENGLAND  who at the sign of an INVADER spoke the words that inspired HER PEOPLE:

 

Elizabeth reviewed her troops at Tilbury.

'My loving people,' she said, we have been persuaded by some that are careful of our safety to take head how we commit ourselves to armed multitudes, for fear of treachery; but I assure you I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful and loving people

LET TYRANTS FEAR!

I have always so behaved myself that , under God, I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects; and therefore am I come amongst you, as you see,

AT THIS TIME

-to lay down my life for my God

AND FOR MY KINGDOM

and for

MY PEOPLE

MY HONOUR

and

MY BLOOD

even in the dust.

I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble women;

BUT I HAVE A HEART OF A KING

and of a

KING of ENGLAND

too, and I think foul scorn that Parma or Spain,

or any

PRINCE of EUROPE

SHOULD DARE TO INVADE THE BORDERS OF MY REALM.'

[S.R. Gardiner-Outline of English History

 to more recent times when a VOICE of DETERMINATION from our greatest WAR LEADER -WINSTON CHURCHILL inspired the NATION with his momentous stirring SPEECH:

You ask, What is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory-victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. May 1940 .

*

FREEDOM

All we have of freedom-all we use and know-This our Fathers bought for us, long and long ago

Kipling. The Old Issue

*

We must be free or die, who speak the tongue

That Shakespeare spoke; the faith and morals hold

Which Milton held.

Wordsworth. Sonnets

*

MARCH 14 - 2017

TREASON

Conservative skulduggery

BACK in 1972 -Tories desert to EU camp

SHORT-TERM SELF-INTEREST EXPLOITED

The UK Accession Bill passed its Third reading on 13th July 1972 by a majority of 17.

Earlier, the debate on the Second reading had lasted for four days (16-19 February), with the Labour Party then officially committed to opposing the legislation. BUT, as happened with the Maastricht Bill two decades later, as Christopher Booker and Richard North observe, 'faced with the possible collapse of their Government, most of the Conservative 'anti-marketeers gritted their teeth' (treacherously, short-sighted and very foolishly -Ed.) 'and walked through the 'aye' lobby. Despite that, 15 Tories voted with the Opposition. TRAITOR

Edward Heath

 got his vote, but only by a water-thin margin:

309 to 301'.

 

 

Tony Benn MP commented after the passage of the Third Reading that

 ‘it was a coup d’etat by a political class who did not believe in popular sovereignty’.

 

Actually, it was worse than that .\It was the start of a coup d’etat by installments’ by a corrupted political class initially led by two operatives-Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon,

 both of whom were recruited German agents  (like Lenin, Rasputin and Lavrentii Beria in the Soviet context, before them) who signed the UK Accession Treaty in exchange for corrupt payments.  Both lied to the British people; and the authors specifically identified one of Geoffrey Rippon’ s worst lies, associated with the alienation of Britain’s fishing waters, the richest in the world.  Here it is worth citing the whole of the authors’ relevant paragraph:

 ‘Desperate to hide how much had been conceded[over fisheries], Geoffrey Rippon…said:

 ‘I must emphasise that these are not just transitional arrangements [in the relevant context, allegedly beneficial to the British fisheries-Ed.]

 which automatically lapse at the end of a fixed period’.  This claim drew fierce challenge from Dennis Healey and Peter Shore[later Lord Shore –further details on EDP bulletin board] both of whom suspected he was lying. 

 What neither had yet seen was the wording of the UK Accession Treaty, which MP’s would not be allowed to examine until after the treaty was signed a month later.  Only when this became available [and Heath and Rippon had accepted their bribes-Ed.]  was it clear that Rippon had told a blatant lie’. [Booker and North, op.cit., page 155]

 International Currency Review

 October 10-2005

 Notes and References:

 ‘Obituary of Sir Edward Heath, the Prime Minister who took Britain into the EEC and presided over constant turmoil at home’,

1. The Daily Telegraph, 18th July 2005.

This was probably the rudest obituary of a prominent UK statesman ever to have appeared in print.  Even so, it omitted any reference to Heath’s recruitment by German (Nazi) intelligence.   However , there are many [coded] references in this obituary, not least the three telling words:

‘He never married’, which observers accurately interpret as meaning that he was homosexual, and therefore an obvious recruitment/blackmail target.

 

2. The Daily Telegraph, 24th July 2005,

 

Christopher Booker (Column),

 

International Currency Review

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 A PATRIOT AND TRUTH-SEEKER

The EDP received in 2005 vital information on the EU from Mr Christopher Story which enabled the EDP to mount a continuing offensive to spread the TRUTH of the EVILS of such a BEAST! which came into existence through LIES! and DECEIT! and as Mr Story has stated in VOLUME 30 NUMBER 4 -the TWIN EVILS of the EU are:-

COLLECTIVISATION AND CORRUPTION.

[What the REMAINERS failed to understand]

These two evils always go together: they did so under overt Communism, when the whole world saw how corrupt the Communist nomenclature was: and they go together under covert communism, notably the version manifested by the

 

 THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE [ 26 ]  .

 

EACH LETTER ABOVE HAS A CHRISTOPHER STORY BULLETIN-TOTAL 26

which the top Soviet intelligence operative Mikhail Gorbachev described on 23rd March 2000, as 'the new European Soviet' It is accordingly a conspicuous waste of time for well-meaning national policymakers, and for the rapidly dwindling class of Euro-ideologues to recommend 'reform' of the EU INSTITUTIONS. They are incapable of reform, because, as we reveal exclusively in this issue, they are born of CORRUPTION- and because the TREATIES that 'sustain' them were procured by means of CORRUPT 'BLack' payments.'

*

More!

 

 

H.F.1150 FREEDOM NOW

H.F.1144 FREEDOM NOW

nov FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017 - (1994 -Official Website - NOV-PT2--2017 )--  novFREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017

NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART4-2017

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

DAILY  MAIL
COMMENT
 

OCTOBER 28-2017

THE STATE GROWS LIKE JAPANESE KNOTWEED

 

 

WHATEVER his many shortcomings as Chancellor, George Osborne

GOT ONE THING RIGHT.

To his credit, he made steady progress slimming down the

BLOATED BUREAUCRACY

and rebalancing the economy to give wealth-creating firms a chance.

True, he should have cut more swiftly when he had voters' full support after the shock of the

FINANCIAL CRISIS.

But he left a leaner

STATE

with private businesses creating

FOUR JOBS for every one shed from the PUBLIC PAYROLL.

So how depressing that figures unearthed by the Mail show the

NUMBER of CIVIL SERVANTS rising SHARPLY for the FIRST TIME in SEVEN YEARS.

Across Whitehall, there are now

390,000 OFFICIALS

-up 2 per cent on last year. The biggest growth

(Surprise, Surprise!)

was at the

FOREIGN AID DEPARTMENT

where numbers have swollen by

39 PER CENT

since

2010

Meanwhile, figures this week show

PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS

still earn

£70 a week

more than their counterparts in

PRIVATE BUSINESS

That's even before their

GOLD-PLATED PENSIONS

are taken into account.

So much for the shroud waving unions who demand an end to

STATE PAY RESTRAINT.

 

IF BRITAIN IS TO FLOURISH AFTER

BREXIT.

IT'S VITAL THAT THE BURDEN OF THE STATE IS REDUCED. CHANCELLOR PHILIP HAMMOND, TAKE NOTE

*  *  *

 

About-turn on

BREXIT

WAS it only last week when the boss of Goldman  Sachs - the world's most rapacious and amoral bank and a cheer leader for

Project Fear-

hinted at plans to shift European operations from London to Frankfurt because of Brexit

What a different note his economists struck yesterday, when they grudgingly acknowledged this country's 'resilient' response to

 BREXIT

suggesting that prospects  in general look bright.

Nor is Goldman Sachs alone in seeing the light. Yesterday, UBS juddered into reverse over its plans to slash 1,000 City jobs, as its boss admitted relocations are looking 'more and more unlikely'.

Other banks, too-including J P Morgan-have back-peddled on their threat to move jobs from London, whose status as the wourld's leading financial centre looks increasingly assured

Meanwhile, British Airways has issued a blunt rebuttal of Mr Hammond's ludicrous claim that all flights in and out of Britain could be grounded the day after Brexit.

Confident of a deal, the airline points out 900 million fliers ca year benefit fro Europe's open skies. Brussels would be certifiably mad to put so much commerce at risk.

It may be too much to hope Remoaners in POLITICS and the MEDIA, will open their eyes to what's happening on the Continent, where NATIONALISM and SEPARATION are tearing the EU apart (witness yesterday's frightening scenes in CATALONIA).

But with business brimming with confidence in post-BREXIT BRITAIN, can't they at least silence their bellyaching-and

STOP TALKING THE COUNTRY DOWN?

*

FULL ARTICLE

*  *  *

[We have added the under mentioned hot topic as might be of interest in seeing how matters have fared in 60 years?]

Salaries in Public and Private employment

THE INTELLIGENT MAN'S GUIDE TO THE POST-WAR WORLD by G.D.H.COLE-VICTOR GOLLANCZ  LTD-1947

This indeed, is the greatest difficulty in the way of to and fro movement between the public services and private business, especially in view of the much higher levels of payment at or near the top in profit-seeking business. It can hardly be dealt with at all completely except by an assimilation of salaries in the two fields, though a closer supervision of private business by the State is bound to involve much more movement between them. Accordingly, the assimilation is a matter of great importance. In practice, the high wartime levels of direct taxation on large incomes has have considerably reduced the differences; and to the extent of their retention the size of the problem will be permanently reduced. It will, however, continue to exist until it is faced directly.

 

Up to a point, it must be faced as soon as the State takes over any substantial number of industries or services hitherto in private hands.  There will have to be salary-scales for these socialised services, and they will have to be related to the scales existing in private industry if the State is to get and keep the best men. Probably., many of the best men will be ready to serve the State for somewhat less money (with somewhat greater security) than they could command in profit-making employment. But the differences must not be too great, and accordingly, at the top, socialised industries will have to pay higher salaries than are at present paid to leading Civil Servants. This will certainly react in time on Civil Service salary scales; and a new adjustment will gradually be reached ,with rewards in both public and private employment corresponding to the incentives needed in the new Socialist, or semi-Socialist, form of industrial society.

1947

 

OCTOBER 28-2017  

H.F.1374

BREXIT

ANNOUNCEMENT

ARTICLE 50 LETTER

DELIVERED BY

'HER MAJESTY'S AMBASSADOR

TO

BRUSSELS

ON

MARCH 29-2017

*

ON

THE FINAL STRETCH

 TO

 FREEDOM

OF THE

PEOPLE AND NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

[TIME ELAPSED SINCE REFERENDUM IN JUNE-2016

 13 MONTHS

 

AUG-2017- AUG-2019 (?)

 

AUG 23-2017.

 

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

SHORT CUT TO EXIT EU NEWS

eu latest news on brexit

latest news eu

eu latest immigration news

eu news now

eu news today

europe news headlines

eu germany latest

eu news germany

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

 

 

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

WHY

 DOESN'T

 the

House of  Lords

move

to

BRUSSELS?

RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-

March 3, 2017

Why doesn't the House of Lords move to

BRUSSELS?

 
 

EXTRACT

NOT for the FIRST TIME, it fell to Norman Tebbit to speak for Britain.

Why was it, he asked his fellow members of the Lords, that they were elevating the

RIGHTS OF FOREIGNERS

over those of the

BRITISH PEOPLE.

'It seems to me the

FIRST DUTY of PARLIAMENT

of the

UNITED KINGDOM

is to care for the

INTERESTS OF THE CITIZENS OF THIS KINGDOM'

he  said.

'If we are to be concerned about the rights of anybody after

BREXIT

to live anywhere on this continent of Europe, it should be concern for the

RIGHTS  OF BRITISH PEOPLE

to live freely and peacefully in those other parts of Europe.

WHY

is everybody here today so excited about an amendment which looks after

FOREIGNERS

and

 NOT

THE BRITISH

Fair point. But judging by the reaction in the chamber, you'd have thought Norman had advocated rounding up all foreign nationals living in Britain and deporting them en masse, preferably by gunpoint. His perfectly accurate use of the word

'FOREIGNERS'

had some sensitive Lords and Ladies gasping for their breath and hissing their disapproval at this ghastly racist in their midst.

 Lord Skinhead of Chingford was, of course. merely questioning the demand that before triggering

ARTICLE 50

[ March 15 -2017?]

Theresa May gives a cast iron guarantee that

ALL

EU CITIZENS living in Britain will be allowed to stay after Brexit.

Actually, she's already tried to do that in exchange for a reciprocal assurance that the same will apply to UK citizens living in Europe.

BUT

she was knocked back by

ANGELA MERKEL

who refuses to enter any kind of negotiation until  the Brexit process is under way.

It has become almost compulsory for everyone to agree that those EU nationals who have settled here-keep the

RIGHT TO STAY.

AND it,s true that the majority of EU citizens who have arrived legally over the past few years make a valuable contribution to our economy.

BUT

could the same be said of some of the less desirable elements who have moved to Britain?

The Eastern European beggars and pickpockets littering the streets of our cities for instance, or the assorted criminals we can't deport because of the

EUROPEAN YUMAN RITES RACKET.

The Remoaners don't want to talk about

THEM

naturally.

And frankly, the Lords aren't really bothered about the RIGHTS of EU citizens living in Britain.

It  is merely a convenient device to try to

DISRUPT and IDEALLY PREVENT BRITAIN'S DEPARTURE from THE

[UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-SO-CALLED]

EUROPEAN UNION...

They hold the democratically expressed wishes of more than 17 million voters in contempt and will do everything they can to frustrate the result of the

 REFERENDUM.

Why else would they want to force Mother Theresa to declare her negotiating position in advance?

No one in their right mind shows their cards before bidding in a poker game. Not unless that want to get taken to the cleaners.

No self-respecting union leader or businessman would offer up one-sided concessions before negotiations had ever begun.

What the Remoaners refuse to accept is that Britain holds the winning hand. We buy more from the EU than they buy from us.

The Europeans realise that, which is why they are going to bluff for as long as possible. Can you imagine any politician in Europe behaving like the

REMAIN CAMP in BRITAIN?

Where's the European equivalent of

PROJECT FEAR, warning of the dire consequences of losing access to the lucrative BRITISH MARKET?

Where are the apocalyptic warning from the EUROPEAN BANK that millions of jobs will be lost and the EU will go into FINANCIAL MELTDOWN unless BRUSSELS can strike a favourable DEAL WITH THE UK?

Where are the demands in Britain that Mrs Merkel offers

BRITISH MANUFACTURERS FREE TRADE

for BMW, Mercedes and Audi being allowed to continue to selling

TARIFF-FREE in BRITAIN.

WHERE'S Holland's answer to Anna Soubry touring the TV and radio studios in the Netherlands, complaining tearfully that the Dutch economy is doomed unless they give Britain everything she wants?

Why aren't French hardliners marching down the Champs Elysees, smashing windows and setting fire to police cars, demanding that Paris must agree unconditionally to BRITAIN'S TERMS so they can carry on exporting thie

CHEESES, WINES and MEAT? I don't recall the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT passing a MOTION forcing Jean-Claude Drunker to make any concessions to BRITAIN before the FORMAL BREXIT TALKS START.

And unless I've missed something, how many former

 GERMAN CHANCELLORS-FRENCH PRESIDENTS and ITALIAN PRIME MINISTERS have OPENLY SIDED WITH BRITAIN, in the same way that

 BLAIR and MAJOR

HAVE BACKED EUROPE AGAINST THEIR OWN PEOPLE?

NO,

all we've heard from across the CHANNEL are THREATS to PUNISH US, to CRIPPLE US ECONOMICALLY, to MAKE OUR LIVES HELL ONCE WE ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO LEAVE THE EU.

YET

the overwhelming instinct of our

TRAITOROUS

POLITICAL CLASS

is to bind the hands of our negotiators, to

APPEASE, COMPROMISE and ultimately SURRENDER-with the UNELECTED HOUSE OF LORDS acting as a PRO-BRUSSELS FIFTH COLUMN,

determined to

BETRAY THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE THEY ARE PAID TO REPRESENT..

Are they setting themselves up as

EU's VICHY GOVERNMENT?

MAYBE THEY SHOULD MOVE TO BRUSSELS.

IN wartime, they'd have been put up against a wall and shot

[AND THERE WOULD BE PLENTY OF VOLUNTEERS TO DO JUST THIS TODAY IN MARCH 2017.]

It's a pity Norman Tebbit isn't a few years younger. We could have put him in charge of the Brexit negotiations.

AT LEAST HE'D SPEAK FOR BRITAIN.

*  *  *

 

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MARCH 3 -2017

H. F.1126 FREEDOM NOW

 
 

A soft Brexit means no Brexit:

The truth is that the term ‘soft Brexit’ is endlessly and lazily repeated without it ever being properly examined. As soon as it is, it disintegrates into dust. Theresa May should call the bluff of these myopic Tory Remainers.

Don’t they realise their antics give comfort to Michel Barnier and Jean-Claude Juncker in Brussels? Mrs May has been weakened by losing her overall majority. Barnier even had the gall yesterday to tell the British Government to hurry up. How overjoyed the Eurocrats will be if they see her under attack by her own party.

And then what? A Tory split can only have one outcome — which is Jeremy Corbyn and his hard-Left clique ruling this country. We came far too close for comfort last week. It wouldn’t take much to put this unsavoury extremist in No 10.

A soft Brexit is no Brexit.

 It’s not an option for this country. It certainly isn’t worth splitting the Tory Party by fighting over it, and giving cheer to EU negotiators in Brussels.

And despite what Mr Hammond and others may claim, despite all the disappointments of last Thursday, there isn’t a shred of evidence that the British people have changed their minds about wanting

 BREXIT.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4601626/A-soft-Brexit-means-no-Brexit-STEPHEN-GLOVER.html#ixzz4kH5M4a1d
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

[A reminder to Philip Hammond]

INDEPENDENCE

'The word independence is united to ideas of dignity and virtue; the word dependence, to ideas of inferiority and corruption.'

J.BENTHAM (1748-1832) -Eng.philosopher.

[The main attraction for a politician is the power and profit within the bureaucracy of the EU-:Mandleson-Kinnock and Family and many-many others.]

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JUNE 13-2017

H.F.1227-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

Stop Common Purpose

The traitorous

 COMMON PURPOSE EXPOSED

 

 

 

Possibly MELANIE PHILLIPS and other Israeli sympathisers with great influence could help reduce the tension to prevent a

WORLD CATASTROPHE ?

 

What we have here is the typical Good Guy - Bad Guy scenario.  FIRST! David Cameron lets it be known that his HEAD  of MI6 has warned the ISRAELIS not to light up the world to extinction and at the very same time he is putting out a disclaimer message by stating that our country is at risk from long range missiles from IRAN - Sounds very much - don't you think -  like Tony Blair's message on IRAQ? - and we all know what tragic results were engendered from that

PACK of LIES!

 

BEWARE OF A FALSE FLAG ATTACK TO JUSTIFY WAR

 

 

ZIONIST GLOBAL  INFRASTRUCTURE AND POWER OF THE ZIONIST STATE

 

More!

 

 

 

 

 

 

LATEST!

 

 

 

 

The View From Europe: Interview with Tom Gillesberg

September 17th, 2012 • 11:09 PM
 

 

 

Tom Gillesberg is a leader in Denmark of the Danish Schiller Institute and is a former candidate for parliament. In this interview he brings to our American audience a view from Europe, and why the world depends on the United States taking the necessary step of impeaching President Obama.

 

 

*

 

'Who sees with equal eye, as Lord of all,

A hero perish, or a sparrow fall,

Atoms or systems into ruin hurled,

And now a bubble burst, and now a world.'

 

Alexander Pope

 

*

SEPTEMBER-2012

H.F.1236

 

Searches related to eu latest news on brexit

brexit what is it

brexit news today

brexit news immigration

brexit eu citizens

brexit news live

brexit latest poll

brexit news latest

grexit and brexit

KEEP UP TO DATE WITH THE LATEST NEWS

ON ENGLAND LEAVING HITLER'S 194O's PLAN

 FOR GERMAN DOMINATION IN THE PEACE.

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

AS WE ALL NOW KNOW DAVID CAMERON ONLY CALLED FOR A REFERENDUM ON JUNE 23-2016 ON THE EU BECAUSE HE WAS SO CONFIDENT THAT' HE HAD IT IN THE BAG'.

[JUST A FEW OF THE OVER 1000 BULLETINS ON OUR WEBSITE OVER 14 YEARS OF THE

COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-UNACCOUNTABLE-UNDEMOCRATIC-WASTEFUL-EXPENSIVE-DESTROYER OF FREEDOM AND SERVANT OF BABEL.]

[MUCH OF OUR WORK REVEALING THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU SINCE 2005 HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A NUMBER OF PATRIOTS  SUCH AS THE

TRUE PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

CHRISTOPHER+STORY

ON THE

THE+EUROPEAN+UNION+COLLECTIVE-ENEMY+OF+ITS+MEMBER+STATES+BY+PATRIOT-CHRISTOPHER+STORY

*

JUNE 19-2017

THE LINKS BELOW  ARE TO OTHER

TRUTHSEEKERS AND PATRIOTS

H.F1228-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

EU QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

There are over 1000 Bulletins on the EU in our

BULLETIN FILE and EU FILE

 CLICK FOR TOP TOPICS

JUNE -2009

1]  EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU ?

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10]    VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]    100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT1          100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT2

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007] -NOT MUCH LUCK HERE!

33]    ALMOST 50% OF EU BUDGET SPENT ON CAP FATCATS

34] SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU

35] WHY BRITISH BUSINESS IS TURNING AGAINST THE EU

36] BRITISH CONSTITUTION-IDENTITY AND VALUES

37] MODERN DILEMA IN POLITICS-TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM.

38] LETTER FROM LORD KILMUIR TO TED HEATH WITH TRUE FACTS OF EU

39] INTERVIEW WITH RUSSIAN DISSIDENT WHO WARNED OF EU DICTATORSHIP

40]   The Truth About A Federal Europe - Part I

41]   Cost of EU to UK - £4,811 million in 2003= 40 District Hospitals equipped and staffed and funded.

42]  CAN THE 1972 ACCESSION TREATY TO THE EU BE REPEALED?

43]  Neil Kinnock in glover - but failed to stop the Shadow of graft over EU’s £68bn spending.

44]  Now the EU wants a single Foreign Office to replace Nation-States Embassies.

45]   How the EU takes over Nation-States.

46]  A Fabian Europhile of 1947 supported Independent Nation-States and the Rule of Law

47]       The New European Constitution - Part 1

48]  12-Point Summary of EU Constitution continued - Part 2

49]  The New European Constitution - Part 1

50]  An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.

51]   Britain takes over as biggest contributor to the EU Budget

52]  Neil Kinnock sacked honest Auditor because of refusal to sign off questionable EU Accounts.

53]  General De Gaulle acclaims British national institutions back in 1960.

54]  Brussels scams can let an MEP fiddle £60,000 a year.

55]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 1

56]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 2

57]  Europe and a conspiracy of Silence.

58]  Ninety-nine countries will soon have Free Trade with EU -without paying a cent to Brussels.

59]   Britain must leave the EU as UN show best area for expansion will be USA-Anglo.Saxon sphere.

60]  82 million Germans have no say as MP’s back EU Constitution.

61]  The EU big brother policy reaches back over two millennium.

62]   Europe: It’s the modern version of the white man’s burden.

63]   E U COUNCIL OF MINISTERS.

64]  EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.

65] German - Nazi - Geopolitical Centre established in Madrid in 1943 by Heinrich Himmler.

66]  What were the Dark Actors Playing Games, which the patriot Dr David Kelly referred?

67]  DEMOCRACY IS A DIALECTICAL FARCE BECAUSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES CALL THE SHOTS NOT SO-CALLED DEMOCRACIES.

68]  Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

69]  EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE.

70]  NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

71]   WHY NO TREATY LIMITING EU POWERS

72]   THE E.U.’S VERY OWN AESOPIAN LANGUAGE.

73]    WHAT IF ENGLAND HADN'T JOINED THE EU

74]   67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM EU

75]   WILL IRELAND SAVE EUROPE FROM ITSELF?

76]   WHY EU REGIONAL POLICY WILL DESTROY THE NATION STATE

77]   EMPIRES HAVE GONE AND MOST PEOPLE LIVE IN NATION STATES.

78 THE FINAL BETRAYAL- WHICH TOOK PLACE IN 2008 

79]  WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR-NOW BROWN-SHE DIDN'T - BUT SOLD US TO THE EU80] 

80]  Almost everything ,which is precious in our civilisation, has come from small States

81]  THE EU BIG BROTHER POLICY REACHES BACK OVER TWO MILLENNIUM

82]   THE EURO A DOOMED CURRENCY

83]  GERMANY AS STRONG MAN OF EUROPE

84]  BRITAIN AND EUROPE-THE CULTURE OF DECEIT

85]  NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

86]  A BETTER WAY FORWARD TOGETHER IN EUROPE-OUT OF THE EUROPEAN UNIOn

87]   A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

88]   TO CONTROL OUR COURTS AND BORDERS IS THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL EUROSCEPTIC STRATEGY.

89] BLACK OPERATIONS AND TRICKERY BIND UK TO EU
90]  HITLER-HAUSHOFER AND GEORGE KENNON-PENTAGON PLANS IDENTICAL
91]  Oh Boyo - Family on Brussels gravy train cost TAXPAYER £34 million and RISING!
92]   NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

93]    WHY DID THEY WANT BRITAIN IN EUROPE -  IN 1963

94]   Lies and The Betrayal of Britain
95]    Be Warned - The lies of 1975 still haunt us
96]   THe Strange Case of the Werner Report
97]   1972 EU Communities Act
98]   Further 200 Reasons why to Reject the Euro and E
99]  New elite threatens EU project admits Lib-Dem Peer
100]     The secretive Bilderberger Group will destroy True Democracy
101] BBC EUROPHILE BIAS-UPDATE-by LORD PEARSON

102]   How ‘a good European’ turned into a eurosceptic whistle-blower

103]   HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

104]    IF Gordon Brown forces this EU TREATY on us, you can kiss goodbye to DEMOCRACY  -HE DID!
105]   FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ARE THE FUTURE OF WORLD TRADE
106]   Twelve Mighty Reasons why you must say 'No' to the EU

107]        How much does it cost the UK in the EU

108]   THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL
109]   IF MONETARY UNION GOES-EUROPEAN PROJECT IS UNDERMINED
 
 
 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE-2009

H. F .11 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

Brexit and Jewish Oligarchy

Goldman Sachs, George Soros are not part of the Brussels Government

 
 

By Gilad Atzmon

Yesterday Britain voted to leave the EU. The causes of this result have been known for a while. More than half of the Brits are dismayed by the level of immigration, multiculturalism, lack of job opportunities, global capitalism, evaporation of manufacturing and a housing bubble that leaves most young Brits without the prospect of a decent future.

The Brexit was an outlet for these legitimate frustrations. Yet the problematic symptoms listed above have little to do with the EU or Brussels. Their root cause lies elsewhere.

Immigration and multiculturalism (that is; the ideology designed to suppress expression of chauvinism) are integral to cultural Marxist ideology. Britain, like the rest of the West, has been subject to an invasive and brutal paradigm designed to vitiate the working class.

Flooding Britain with immigration was a conscious political act pushed by the Jewish left and the Jewish lobby. This is explainable. Jews have good reason to be fearful of the working classes. Historically, it has been the working classes that turned against the Jews. Breaking society into fragmented and diverse segments is transparently a Jewish Left interest. When a society is broken into a manifold of tribes and identities, the Jews become merely one tribe amongst many.

I am an immigrant myself and not an anti immigration campaigner. However, at a certain stage in the early 2000s my eight piece Orient House Ensemble consisted of seven immigrants and one native Brit. We were Israelis, a Palestinian, a Romanian and a Moldovan. At the time our ensemble won every British musical award. We were a favourite of the BBC and the Guardian’s album of the year. We were heroes of multiculturalism and the symbol of a new ‘tolerant’ British society. The British Council sent us around the globe to promote those ideals. This didn’t last long. I quickly grasped the underlying agenda. As those who know me may expect, I didn’t keep my mouth shut.

Yesterday the Brits voted against immigration. But leaving the EU may not be the answer for their plight. Looking into the elements and ideologies that planted pro-immigration policies and multiculturalism may be the ultimate way forward.

brexit

 

The demography of the referendum suggests that it is primarily the British working people who want to leave the EU. In the last four decades they have watched manufacturing dying out. They saw an economic bubble that left many of them impoverished and off the property ladder. But it wasn’t really the EU that caused all of it and leaving the EU may not improve things. Milton Friedman, who taught ‘free market’ philosophy to Margaret Thatcher, never lived in Brussels. Friedman believed in the service economy. He also believed that capitalism wasn’t just a great idea, it was also

very good for the Jews.  Goldman Sachs, George Soros and others who fecklessly destroy one country after another are also not part of the Brussels Government. The British vote was actually a vote against Goldman Sachs, Soros, Friedman and cultural Marxism, but most of them do not know it yet.

Yesterday the Brits proved, once again, that they are a brave people. They made a decision that they understood could inflict some serious difficulties on their society. Knowing that, they marched into the Brexit with pride and I admire their courage.  The Brits voted against immigration, banksters, the global economy, the City and the two parties that have facilitated this disaster for decades.  However, the Brits failed to attack the root cause of the problem.  Leaving the EU is not going to emancipate them. For Jewish oligarchy, the Brexit is a red alert. ‘Hands off’ would be the most clever strategy. Can they follow this humble advice? I doubt it.

Most British Jews have little to do with it. Liam Fox and Michael Gove who were amongst the leaders of the call to leave, are notorious for being dedicated servants of the Jewish lobbies. The Jewish press was pretty quiet on the Brexit.

And

crucially, if British Jews had identified that the call to leave the EU was somehow related to Jewish power, Jewish Banking or Jewish Left pro immigration we would have seen the rapid formation of a

“Jews for Brexit campaign.”

This is what Jews do when they detect dissent to their political power, they immediately form the bodies that control the opposition.

 

#Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

 

Related Posts:

*

[HIGHLIGHTING-CAPS ETC- ARE OURS]

JULY 23-2016

 

H.F.932 FREEDOM NOW

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 2

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

The Treaty of Rome was never actually signed by the six founding 'Member States' of the European Community, and could therefore be technically invalid, or even invalid in fact.

Dr Hallstein was one of the 'signatories', with Dr Adenauer, of the Treaty of Rome establishing the European Communities, 'signed' on 25th March 1957.

A young Italian Chancery aide called Giulio Andreotti ( later Italy's Prime Minister, subsequently embroiled in scandal like his fellow former Italian Prime Minister, the President of the European Commission, Romano Prodi) had contrived to procure the signatures  of the Plenipotentiaries on

blank sheets of paper

 because the German, Dutch and Italian translations of the French original were not yet available, and the delegates had to leave for their respective capitals. .  .

The official text of the Treaty of Rome states, at the end: 'In witness whereof, the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed this Treaty: Done at Rome this twenty-fifth day of March in the year of one thousand nine hundred and fifty- seven:

 

P. H. SPAAK (the Belgian Communist-Ed.) ADENAUER, PINEAU , ANTONIO SEGNI.BECH, J.LUNS, J. CH SNOY ET D'OPPUERS, HALLSTEIN, M . FAURE, GAETANO MARTINO, LAMBERT SCHAUS, J.LINTHORST HOMAN'.

*

[More background information will be available in the near future or for your copy contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

AUGUST-2008

 

H.F.196

DAILY  MAIL
COMMENT
 

OCTOBER 28-2017

THE STATE GROWS LIKE JAPANESE KNOTWEED

 

 

WHATEVER his many shortcomings as Chancellor, George Osborne

GOT ONE THING RIGHT.

To his credit, he made steady progress slimming down the

BLOATED BUREAUCRACY

and rebalancing the economy to give wealth-creating firms a chance.

True, he should have cut more swiftly when he had voters' full support after the shock of the

FINANCIAL CRISIS.

But he left a leaner

STATE

with private businesses creating

FOUR JOBS for every one shed from the PUBLIC PAYROLL.

So how depressing that figures unearthed by the Mail show the

NUMBER of CIVIL SERVANTS rising SHARPLY for the FIRST TIME in SEVEN YEARS.

Across Whitehall, there are now

390,000 OFFICIALS

-up 2 per cent on last year. The biggest growth

(Surprise, Surprise!)

was at the

FOREIGN AID DEPARTMENT

where numbers have swollen by

39 PER CENT

since

2010

Meanwhile, figures this week show

PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS

still earn

£70 a week

more than their counterparts in

PRIVATE BUSINESS

That's even before their

GOLD-PLATED PENSIONS

are taken into account.

So much for the shroud waving unions who demand an end to

STATE PAY RESTRAINT.

 

IF BRITAIN IS TO FLOURISH AFTER

BREXIT.

IT'S VITAL THAT THE BURDEN OF THE STATE IS REDUCED. CHANCELLOR PHILIP HAMMOND, TAKE NOTE

*  *  *

[We have added the under mentioned hot topic as might be of interest in seeing how matters have fared in 60 years?]

Salaries in Public and Private employment

THE INTELLIGENT MAN'S GUIDE TO THE POST-WAR WORLD by G.D.H.COLE-VICTOR GOLLANCZ  LTD-1947

This indeed, is the greatest difficulty in the way of to and fro movement between the public services and private business, especially in view of the much higher levels of payment at or near the top in profit-seeking business. It can hardly be dealt with at all completely except by an assimilation of salaries in the two fields, though a closer supervision of private business by the State is bound to involve much more movement between them. Accordingly, the assimilation is a matter of great importance. In practice, the high wartime levels of direct taxation on large incomes has have considerably reduced the differences; and to the extent of their retention the size of the problem will be permanently reduced. It will, however, continue to exist until it is faced directly.

 

Up to a point, it must be faced as soon as the State takes over any substantial number of industries or services hitherto in private hands.  There will have to be salary-scales for these socialised services, and they will have to be related to the scales existing in private industry if the State is to get and keep the best men. Probably., many of the best men will be ready to serve the State for somewhat less money (with somewhat greater security) than they could command in profit-making employment. But the differences must not be too great, and accordingly, at the top, socialised industries will have to pay higher salaries than are at present paid to leading Civil Servants. This will certainly react in time on Civil Service salary scales; and a new adjustment will gradually be reached ,with rewards in both public and private employment corresponding to the incentives needed in the new Socialist, or semi-Socialist, form of industrial society.

1947

 

G.D.COLE

OCTOBER 28-2017  

H.F.1374

 

 

 

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF

ENGLAND

 AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

A REMINDER!-IF YOU NEED IT?

101 REASONS FOR LEAVING THE EU

 

PART 1

 

We wish to express our indebtedness and gratitude to those who in books and articles have sought to alert the Nation to its Danger, and whose observations are reflected or summarised here: in particular,

 

Rodney Atkinson and Norris McWhirter

for Treason at Maastricht

 

Adrian Hilton for The Principality and Power of Europe

 

Lindsay Jenkins for The Last Days of Britain

And

 

For the late Lord Shore of Stepney’s

Separate Ways

 

Copies of this booklet can be obtained from the Publishers -Priced £1.20 incl p&p

 

St Mathew Publishing Ltd

24 Geldart St.

Cambridge

Tel: 01223 504871 Fax: 01223 512304

 

*

 

1. hush up

 

Cabinet papers pre - 1970 show the Heath government to have had full knowledge of the EEC being a long -term plan for the unitary European State with its own Currency; but the facts were suppressed by this and succeeding governments with the Deliberate intention of keeping the Nation in the dark

 

1.         ‘surrenders of sovereignty’’

 

On 14th December 1960 the Lord Chancellor,

Lord Kilmuir,

Britain’s senior legal officer, warned Edward Heath of the implications of signing the Treaty of Rome:

‘’ To satisfy the requirements of the treaty, Parliament could enact legislation which would give automatic force of Law to any existing or future regulations made by… the Community…It is clear that the Council of Ministers could make regulations which would be binding on us even against our wishes… It is the first step on the road, which leads… to the federal state… I must emphasise that in my view the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serious ones…these objections ought to be brought out into the open.

 

2.         ‘end of Britain’’

 

That the consequences of membership had been realised by some at Westminster about this time is apparent from a speech in 1962 by Hugh Gaitskell, leader of the Labour party, who rightly identifying ‘’ the desire of those, who created the European Community, for a political federation. That is what they mean, that is what they offer’’, added that this would bring about the end of Britain as an independent [Nation State]…the end of a thousand years of history.

 

3.         the big lie

 

Edward Heath’s 1971 White Paper on joining the EEC deceived Parliament and the People with its false statements that’’ there is no question of any erosion of essential sovereignty’’, and that Britain’s Sovereignty would somehow be ‘’enlarged’’ by ‘sharing’’

 

4.         ministry of propaganda

 

Between 1970 and 1972 the Heath Government directed a secret propaganda offensive, known as the Connaught Breakfasts, in which Cabinet Ministers, Foreign Heads of Department, civil servants, media managers and journalists, in conjunction with the European Movement, carried on TV, radio and newspaper campaign to swing round strongly opposed public opinion to acceptance of the EEC, public money being used in the process.

 

5.         unconstitutional…1

 

The 1972 Act which took Britain into the EEC was in breach of the Constitution, in that the Government allowed no prior consultation of the electorate by special General Election or Referendum, as is required under the Constitution for Parliamentary measures involving Constitutional Change, the precedents being those of 1831/2 and 1910.

 

 

7. unconstitutional…2

 

By passing the 1972 European Communities Act, Parliament unconstitutionally attempted to renounce its legal Sovereignty, so as to make the British People subject to enactments of outside agencies, and ending its own ability to put into effect the expressed wishes of the Electorate.

 

8. unconstitutional…3

 

In doing so, it deliberately and wrongfully denied the, ultimate Sovereignty of the People, of which Parliament is Constitutionally both Servant and Defender and which at the end of each Parliament’s term is returned to its Possessors.

 

9.                     unconstitutional…4

 

It is the Corner Stone of the Constitution that no Parliament is or can be bound by enactments of its predecessors; but the Act of 1972 unconstitutionally purported (Section 2.4) to be mandatory upon all succeeding Parliaments.

   

10.               unconstitutional…5

  

The Act of 1972 is unconstitutional in the wider respect that falsehood and deception was employed to secure its enactment, contrary not only to the spirit of the Constitution but of all procedure whatsoever.

 

11. test case

 

The Metric Martyrs’ appeal against their conviction is based on the fact that the 1985 Imperial Weights &Measures Act, which permits trading in pounds and ounces, constitutionally takes precedence over the earlier Act of 1972 which made us members of the EU; and it is thus a test case not only between British and EU law, but of whether the 1972 Act can have abrogated the Constitution.

 

12.indestructible

 

Any supposition that the Act in some sense annulled the Constitution is untenable, since (apart from the 1972 Act itself being unconstitutional both in its content and process of enactment) the unique unwritten British Constitution is not law, but essentially an honoured undertaking and consensus in those who have created and live under it as to the proper conduct of Parliamentary affairs, and thus incapable of being set aside by legal means.

 

13. … twilight hour?

 

By subjecting the British people to decrees other than the laws enacted by their own legislature, the Act contravened the undertaking in the Coronation Oath ‘’ to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom according to their laws and customs’’; the provisions of the treason Act 1795, against engaging in actions ‘’tending to the overthrow of the laws, government and happy constitution’’ of the United Kingdom, and those of the Treason Felony Act of 1848 condemning ant who attempt to ‘’ deprive or depose our most gracious Lady the Queen from the style, honour or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom’’; and the Privy Councillor's Oath ‘’ To bear faith and allegiance to the Crown and defend its jurisdiction and power against all foreign…persons…or states.’’

 

14. royal commoner

 

Allegiance to H.M. the Queen is in effect allegiance to Brussels, since through the Queen’s EU citizenship and accountability in her own courts to superior EU law, Her Majesty has vassal status, and an Oath of Allegiance to her now stands’ subject to the Commission’s tolerance’’ so long as she and her Nation do not show themselves disloyal to the sovereignty of the European Union.

 

 

15. unconstitutionality

 

The chief reason for the Labour government’s calling a Referendum in 1975 was the unconstitutionality of the European Communities

 

16. bizarre

A retrospective Referendum upon an Act of Parliament was without precedent in British history, and partook of the nature of inertia salesmanship, especially since accompanied by the dispatching of government literature to every household with the disinformation that the Act had been purely a free trade agreement, and urging a ‘Yes’ vote; a species of official activity also without precedent, and just as questionable.

 

17. the great divide

Britain’s becoming and remaining a member of the EU, and the methods employed to his end, resulted from the emergence of what Lord Goodhart memorably described as ‘’ a political establishment’’ with purposes disturbingly opposed to the wish of the electorate; his book ‘Full-Hearted Consent (1976) ironically gaining its title from Mr Heath’s assurance during the 1970 General Election campaign that, if there were a future possibility of entering the EEC, no government would take their nation into it’’ without the full-hearted consent of Parliament and the People.

 

18. vote as EU please

 

The political establishment’s continuing activities have brought about a new situation, new to British politics, in which the widespread public hostility to the EU’s increasing encroachments is denied party political expression, the policies of the major parties all being favourable to membership.

 

19. polling days

 

In a nationwide MORI opinion poll carried out on behalf of the British Democracy Campaign 15-21 March, 2001, in which 1805 adult respondents were questioned face to face in their homes, 52% of these offered an opinion declared themselves in favour of leaving the EU now, 71% wanted a Referendum on continued membership, and 75% considered that the British people had not received sufficient information on the implications of the EU.

 

20. mobile goalposts

 

Through the deeper irregularity of its plan to proceed by stealth through a series of treaties until the European State was a fait accompli before its populations had come to realise what was going on, the EU has developed into a concept and institution far other than what was voted on in 1975 Referendum, and so without democratic validation in this as in other countries.

 

 

21. undemocratic

 

The European Union is an unrepresentative and authoritarian institution, by virtue of the fact that the members of the legislative (Council of Ministers) and its executive (Commission) are not directly elected by and responsible to the voters of a EU constituency.

 

22. non-accountable

 

The EU Council of Ministers is composed of the non-dismissible nominees of the governments of member states, who are thus removed from democratic accountability.

 

23. horse-trading

 

Britain’s voice in the Council is one amongst many; and policy decisions, as the outcome of conflict of interests and pressures resolved by bargaining, by no means necessarily correspond to Britain’s needs and the wishes of its electorate.

 

24. cabal

 

The Council, more strictly the legislative body, and the Commission, which with its executive roll also issues legislative proposals, both meet in secret; and since the fifty or so persons who compose the two have not been elected to European government functions, and in carrying them out are accountable to no-one, they constitutes, not a legislative, but a ruling oligarchy.

 

25. big brothers

 

Though the EU Commission are unelected appointees without democratic mandate or accountability, they have power to impose directives and regulations by by-passing the legislatures of democratic states.

 

26. the parliament: authority

 

Whereas the British Cabinet is constitutionally answerable to Parliament in Westminster, where a government defeat on a motion of no confidence involves a Dissolution and General Election, the European Union’s Parliament, so called, is entirely without such control over the Commission, which is effectively the EU Cabinet.

 

27. the parliament: finance

 

From its earlier days to the present, what has been confirmed the Westminster Parliament’s power has been its direction of finance; but the EU Parliament is without a corresponding capacity?

 

28. the parliament: legislation

 

Unlike all the other parliaments in the Western tradition, the EU Parliament is unable to legislate, its functions being merely to review and agree measures drawn up by the Commission, and thereby to have virtually no legislative role.

 

29 the parliament veto

 

Nor does the Parliament have a final veto over Commission regulations and directives, since through the procedure euphemistically named ‘’Conciliation’’, the Commission can at its will override any negative vote.

 

30. façade

 

The word ‘’Parliament’’ is thus a misnomer for what is little more than a rubber-stamp or puppet agency; but the democratic election of its members creates the dangerous illusion of democracy being at work, in what is in essence an authoritarian regime.

 

31.      inferior government

 

Through its membership of the EU, Britain is being subjected to a species of non-representative, non-democratic, authoritarian government far inferior to that which prevailed at Westminster until 1973, and having features reminiscent of the dictatorial systems which flourished on the continent of Europe in the not very distant past.

 

32.      12-star chamber?

 

The European Court of Justice, whose members are appointed by the various governments, is the supreme arbiter on EU law, with power to overrule the laws of member states; but being charged under the Treaty of Rome with ensuring that provisions of all the EU treaties, and the principle of ‘’ever closer union’’, are observed, and in its own words devoted to ‘’overcoming the resistance of national governments to European integration’’, it is politically predisposed and active in a manner incompatible with judicial impartiality.

 

33.      moot points

 

EU treaties and regulations are generally cast in such obscure language that all wishing to be sure where they stand will be forced to go to the European Court of Justice: so that it will become an absolute source of political authority, and the European State be unassailably dominant over the former nations now its provinces.

 

34.      EU rules OK

 

EU law, as conveyed by the treaties, regulations and directives, and decrees and rulings of the European Court, are accepted by British courts as taking precedence over national law, the ECJ having declared that ‘’Every national court must apply Community law in its entirety and must accordingly set aside any provision of national law which may conflict with it, whether prior or subsequent to this Community rule’’ (ECR 629 at 643,644).

 

35.      ‘’tidal wave’’

 

The result is that the British Statute and Common law are being superseded, and law-making has become primarily the prerogative of the European Union, which has been described by a British judge as ‘’a bold new source of law’’, and whose legislation, according to the late Lord Denning, a former Master of the Rolls, is no longer’’ an incoming tide flowing up the estuaries of England’’, but’’ now like a tidal wave bringing down sea walls and flowing inland over our fields and houses, to the dismay of us all’’ (quoted in the Times, 1st April 1996).

 

 

 

36. corpus juris

 

In place of existing laws in the member countries, there will have been instituted under the European State the Corpus Juris, a body of law largely in accordance with continental legal systems, deriving from three main sources: the Corpus Juris Civilis of the Roman Emperor Justinian, Inquisition law, and the Code Napoleon

 

37. euro state prosecutor

 

Corpus Juris is to be administered by the European State Prosecutor, and operate through European courts and trans-national police and the courts and police forces of member states, so combining police and prosecution into one entity

 

38. continental menu

 

Judicial procedure is to be as already in practice on the Continent, the European State Prosecutor having responsibility for investigation, arrest, committal to trial, presentation of the prosecution case in court, judgment and imposition of sentence, trial taking place before an inquisitorial judge and two professional assessors: the State, in effect, both judge and jury.

 

39. … innocent? Prove it!

 

Also as on the Continent, the concept of presumed innocence will disappear, and it will become the responsibility of the accused to prove his innocence to the court, contrary to the position under English law, where the burden of proof rests with the prosecution, and the accused is innocent unless and until proved guilty.

 

40.                   goodbye, Habeas Corpus

 

Corpus Juris will quash the right of Habeas Corpus, instituted in 1215 by Magna Carta  (article 39), by which it is granted in perpetuity to all subjects of the monarch that no-one should suffer the loss of liberty without evidence warranting his further detention being established in a court hearing, normally within 48 hours of his arrest.

 

41. farewell, trial by jury

 

Corpus Juris will similarly abolish the right of trial by jury, whose beginnings date from as early as 1166 in the reign of Henry 11, through which the question of a person’s innocence or guilt is determined by twelve of his peers, not by the judiciary, a practice which, because of a jury’s freedom to acquit a person technically guilty under an unjust decree, ensures that laws made by the state are always acceptable to the people, and that government pressure upon, or corruption of, the judiciary shall never be able to affect the impartial administration of justice.

 

42. ‘ the test of civilisation’’

 

In a Minute to the Home Secretary of 21st November, 1943, Winston Churchill observed: ‘’The great principles of Habeas Corpus and trial by jury… are the supreme protection invented by the British people for ordinary individuals against the State… The power of the executive to cast a man in prison without formulating any charge known to law for an indefinite period, is in the highest decree odious, and is the foundation for all totalitarian governments… Nothing can be more abhorrent to democracy. This is really the test of civilisation.’’

 

 

* * *

 

 

43. above the law

 

The European State’s judicial system involves the introduction of forces of armed police, whether members of Europol or of the paramilitary European border police in process of formation, enjoying diplomatic immunity from arrest, and thus above the law; unlike British police, who, while charged with enforcement of the, remain ordinary members of the public, themselves subject to the laws they uphold

 

44. clear enough

 

The reasons for the European State police’s immunity from the law have never been explained, though the parallel with the police forces of authoritarian regimes is manifest

 

45. just the start

 

Eurojust, the provisional EU public prosecution agency, which is closely linked to Europol, already has autonomous, non-accountable power to initiate investigations in every state of the European Union, Europol being able to order surveillance of any British person by letters, E-mail or ‘phone tapping, and to acquire upon demand secret intelligence from British security agencies M15 and M16.

 

46. affront

 

The concepts, provisions and methods of the judicial system of the emerging European State are legally and ethically inferior to the system of British justice admired throughout the world for its humanity and impartiality: and if ever instituted in Britain, would be a regressive and affronting imposition.

 

47. Euro Army

 

The future of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), founded upon the predominant military power of the United States, which has for more than half a century secured and maintained Europe’s peace, is now threatened by the European State’s establishing an Army of its own, dubbed the Rapid Reaction Force, upon the pretext that it will facilitate military operations in which NATO does not wish to take part.

48. pretext

 

Since arrangements already exist within NATO for the EU to take military action without NATO’s participation, but using its facilities, assets, transport and intelligence, the reasons for setting up a European Army can only be to confirm the emerging Statehood of the EU, and lessen the commitment of the United States to Europe’s security: so jeopardising NATO’s continuing role, and thereby the peace of Europe.

 

 

49. escape of cat

 

Helmut Kohl’s statement that ‘’ a united Europe without a common defence is, in the long run, not feasible’’ (Independence, CIB, January 2000,p1) would seem to apply regarding the first; and that of Jacques Chirac, ‘’The object of a European defence identity is to contain the United States’’ (cited by Michael Fabricant, MP, House of Commons, 29th March 2000), with respect to the second.

* *

 

DESPOTISM is:

 

[‘ Everything by the EU- but nothing by YOU ’]

 * * *

 (50 - More Reasons in Part 2.)

 Or you may order a booklet from:

 

St Mathew Publishing Ltd

24 Geldart St. Cambridge

CB1 2lX

 

Tel: 01223 504871 or Fax: 01223 512304

2004

CLICK FOR PART 2

 

H.F.1288-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT!

 

SO WILL BRITAIN ONE DAY BE  MUSLIM?

by

Ruth Dudley Edwards

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

*

Our failure to have children.

Welfarism.

Political Correctness.

And a

LACK of WILL

 to fight Islamic extremism

 

 

 

THIS WEEK has been another terrible one for those of us who want a society in which all races, religions and cultures mix to their mutual advantage and

ENRICHMENT.

On Tuesday, five men were sentenced to life in prison for plotting to use a huge fertiliser bomb in what would have been the UK's largest mass murder.

Omar Khyam, Salahuddin Amin, Anthony Garciaand Jawa Akbar -first and second generation immigrants - responded to the tolerance of the British people

BY TRYING TO KILL AS MANY OF THEM AS POSSIBLE.

It is absurd to hope that the exposure of their evil after a 13-month trial which cost an estimated

£50,000,000

-has finally provided the wake-up call that this slumbering country so badly needs?

I'm one of those old-fashioned immigrants to this country who feels passionately grateful, is proudly British (as well as Irish -having been born in Dublin) and believes that immigrants have more duties than rights. And further, that one of those is to adjust to British society rather than expecting it to adjust to them. [ has been the practice for some decades but more so during the Blair years.]

However, one aspect of contemporary British society which I refuse to adjust to is its weakness in the face of the

ENEMY WITHIN

In my many conversations with like-minded people about the threat that radical Islam poses to the

 BRITISH WAY OF LIFE

-And indeed, to European civilisation -we frequently end by despairingly agreeing that the

WEST

-seems intention committing

POLITICAL and CULTURAL

SUICIDE.

When we look starkly at the demographic statistics, the wimpishness of our

ESTABLISHMENT

-in the face of the

THREAT

-the perversions perpetuated by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-and our passivity, it's hard to avoid the

CONCLUSION

-that within a couple of generations

ISLAM

-will be in

CONTROL of EUROPE

And before anyone says that there nothing wrong if this happened, since the vast majority of

MUSLIMS

are tolerant people who would not dream of interfering with

OUR WAY OF LIFE

-it's necessary  to point out that in

MUSLIM COUNTRIES

, it's usually the radicals and extremists

MULLAHS

-who regard

TOLERANCE

AS A VICE

-WHO MAKE THE RUNNING.

This occurs too in microcosm in

MUSLIM GHETTOS

around

EUROPE

We saw the frightening fundamentalist fringe of

ISLAM

-marching, threatening and perpetuating violence over the cartoons depicting

MOHAMMAD

IN

DENMARK

while the majority of Muslims - who, yes, of course are tolerant and decent - kept their mouths shut and stayed at

HOME

YES, Islam may be a great religion. BUT

-in its fundamentalist version, some of its values are antipathetic to ours, and if they triumph in

EUROPE 

-they will

THREATEN OUR VALUES

such as

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

and

SPEECH

and the spirit of intellectual inquiry that made

EUROPEAN CIVILISATION

Great and Prosperous

 

The danger of ending up like these poor, despotic and medieval

Islamic States

-in which millions live miserably is the prospect that

CHRISTIANS

HINDUS

MODERATE MUSLIMS and NON-BELIEVERS -should be uniting

TO PREVENT

 

BUT THE TRUTH IS WE ARE DOING LITTLE TO STOP IT.

Consider first a few chilling statistics.

EUROPEANS ARE FAILING TO REPRODUCE

[Yet in our own island millions of potential citizens have been 

SLAUGHTERED AT BIRTH

thanks to David Steels -Abortion Bill of 1965?

It is still taking place in 2007 though there is NOW an  growing awareness of the tragedy to the potential mother and to society in general that many more doctors today are refusing to condone the

MURDER.

Recently the sight of full grown foetuses being deprived of their lives has now brought the horror and injustice of the action to destroy life.

In an age of contraception of many devices and anti-life pills it is unbelievable that any potential mother was unable to take the necessary steps to prevent conception.

David Steels Bill was to prevent back-street abortions and he himself a few ears ago voiced his concern as to what has happened over the years since.]

*

Consider  first a few chilling statistics.

Europeans are failing to reproduce. Just to keep the population steady, you need 2.1 births per women

[This is a case for Government action by offering cash and other vital services to enable the reluctant mother to do her best for her community and country.]

However in 2005, the European average was 1.38.

In Ireland it was 1.9

France it was 1.89

Germany 1.35

Italy 1.23

Britain scored in the middle of this range with 1.6

BUT

That was because - like France - we have a large

MUSLIM POPULATION

with a high birth rate. Indeed,

MUSLIMS

are out breeding

 non-Muslims

through out

 EUROPE

 

 

[Many of whom have absolutely no intention of integrating -

Thank you very much Mr Blair -we don't think so.]

'Just look at the development within Europe.'

said a triumphant Norwegian Imam a few months ago

'where the number of

MUSLIMS

is expanding like mosquitoes.

Every Western women in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim women in the same countries is producing an average of 3.5 children.

'OUR WAY OF THINKING WILL PROVE MORE POWERFUL THAN YOURS' he said.

The big question this poses is:

WHY ARE WE NOT REPRODUCING?

There are many reasons, but probably the most important are the decline of religion and the liberation of women.

[The populations which have the stronger religious stance will be the eventual rulers of Europe. It can be a Christian Europe or a Muslim Europe. The Governments of Europe and the shrinking United Kingdom have to decide.]

In Ireland, when the Roman Catholic Church effectively ran society, sex for procreation, contraceptives were banned, the normal size for a family was around five or six children, bur 12 or 13 were not uncommon.

As the country embraced secularism in the 1980s, birth rates plummeted, exacerbated by the new -found confidence of women that made them choose careers rather than domesticity.

WHEREAS in the 1970s, I was regarded in both the UK and Ireland as odd for being married but voluntarily childless, these days, childlessness |

IS A COMMON CHOICE

It is a world where one-child families abound and to have more than two children is to be regarded as eccentric and probably environmentally irresponsible.

Moreover, the erosion of family life and the long - hours culture place a heavy burden on those prepared to rear the next generation.

Despite these social forces, even in the UK, devote Muslims and Orthodox Jews obey instructions to have large families.

Confronted with this demographic revolution and official statistics which showed there were too few young people to support an ageing population, European governments decided to embrace

IMMIGRATION

-as an inherent good without any thought for the consequences.

As a result, politicians and businessmen assured us that we had to have economic growth in n order to prop up ever greater public spending and that it could be provided only by importing large numbers of workers from abroad

BUT WHY WASN'T THERE A NATIONAL DEBATE

ABOUT

Whether it was wise to mortgage our cultural future for the sake of a mess of financial pottage?

[A recent report on the cost  and benefit of large scale

IMMIGRATION

estimated that the country benefited by

ONLY - 50p

 for each migrant]

Where were the politicians arguing against the doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow

ILLEGITIMATE

Who among the liberal elite's commentariat were challenging the moral relativism that flew in the face of

SENSE and SENSIBILITY

-by insisting that the culture of

Shakespeare

The King James Bible

Keats's poetry

Turner's paintings

and

Elgar's music

-was no more important than - the cultures of other

IMPORTED MINORITIES?

 

We know the answer all too well.

Cries of racism drowned out rational argument - not just here but throughout

OLD EUROPE

As one gloomster put it:

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which is thought what

SENTIMENTALITY is to COMPASSION

-means that the intelligentsia of the

WEST

-has disarmed itself in advance of any possible struggle.

The result of all this, as recent events have made tragically clear, was that

BRITISH CULTURE

-was

UNDERMINED and SOCIAL COHESION

DAMAGED.

Separated from mainstream society by geographical and cultural apartheid, which has been fostered by

MULTICULTURALISM

-many immigrants were denied the chance to

INTEGRATE.

 

AND, INSTEAD OF BEING TOLD BY THE HOST COMMUNITY

THAT IF THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ADHERE

-to the values of a liberal, pluralist democracy, they should

RETURN HOME

They were asked how they would like

BRITAIN

-to conform to

THEIR VALUES.

THE STORY WAS VERY MUCH THE SAME THROUGHOUT EUROPE

The robust American political commentator Mark Steyn, a disillusioned Anglophile has already written us off. The thesis of his Blackly comic book,

*

America Alone:

The End Of The World As We Know It

*

-is that the U.S. will survive because the

RELIGIOUS RIGHT ARE CONFIDENT

 AND

 REPRODUCE

BUT

 THAT EUROPE IS FINISHED

Its not just demographic decline, he says, it's also the unsustainability of the

MODERN WELFARE STATE

-in which we depend so much on our own individual resources.

We are also, he believes, suffering from 'civilisational exhaustion':

CULTURAL DISINTEGRATION

-brought about by

BIG GOVERNMENT

[Or if you prefer BIG BROTHER]

-which has fatally

DESTROYED OUR SENSE OF SELF-RELIANCE.

 

MEANWHILE, we are importing large numbers of unemployed youths from abroad in order to maintain

OUR

STANDARD OF LIVING

Yet many of these newcomers have nothing

BUT

CONTEMPT

 FOR OUR

WAY OF LIFE

-and some even wish

TO DESTROY IT

Steyn sees this as a

CIVIL WAR

which

EUROPE

-is too timid even to acknowledge - let alone

LET ALONE WIN

[This is something the Tory Mr Oliver Letwin or as we have said on a number of occasions Mr Let-them-win -and they will, who appears to be out of touch with the real issues that matter to our country in the early years of the 21st century.]

Mr Steyn says:

'Islam has youth and WILL

Europe has age and WELFARE.'

It's hard not to agree with Mark Steyn, especially as every day seems to bring more evidence

THAT AS A SOCIETY

WE ARE TERMINALLY

MAD

For example, this week's fertiliser bomb trial had heard that the key plotters had been radicalised by the hate preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed whom the judge condemned as

'a master of cowardice -who works in the shadows.'

This was the same firebrand who as an asylum -seeker here, had pocketed

£275,000

-in Welfare benefits.

[It is the same mentality shown by

Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer and many others

-who instead of spending the £32 million allocated for building prisons a few years ago are now doing almost anything in order to keep thousands of criminals many repeat offenders and dangerous, out of prison and giving many early release so they can go back to torment their victims and as has happened in a number of occasions returned to have another go at their robbery or other offence knowing that the worst that might happen is either a holiday or community service or whatever  and as many prisons these days are very much like 5star hotels there will be no hardship encountered if they are so lucky to win the prison admission lottery -then it will be a nice break to see old friends and anyway they will be out before they have completed their degree in political science or whatever.

The victims of crime, many of them elderly - poor and lonely won't as a rule be free of fear of their tormentor returning for a second or even third try to rob them of the little they have  and as has happened even assault and kill the defenceless pensioner - but some victims even lose heart and end their own lives by depriving themselves of food because they have lost hope that they can be safe again and we have their so-called protectors such as The Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer the new 'Justice' Minister ? who says 'Jail's the wrong place for burglars' and others who are doing whatever they can to keep the criminals out of jail. If the Army can put up a temporary  barracks in double quick time then there would be spaces for all the thousands of criminals who should be

OUT OF THE COMMUNITY.

Of course there would be complaints that the conditions are not up to the standards of the 5star prisons that they have 'visited' over the years and anyway there is

Tony Blair's

1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

to keep them out of such uncomfortable surroundings which would not provide the 'key' service which has been introduced with their friendly solicitor providing a drugs service as an extra comfort.

THERE IS NO LONGER JUSTICE AS THE SENTENCE DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME

ANYMORE]

*

To continue:

Despite all this, I still believe there are grounds for hope - largely because Muslim hotheads have overplayed their hand by blowing people up, rioting in their neighbourhoods or broadcasting hate -filled speeches which alienate them from the host community.

*

 

[Well we are of the opinion that until the Government shows to the Muslim population that they will not give way on insisting that ALL newcomers and those already with us conform to

OUR RULE OF LAW

 

-and punish without hesitation any breaches of the Law and make it plain that anyone who is a threat to our country WILL BE extradited. BUT of course we have Tony Blair's 1998 Human Rights Act and articles within the 1951 British led Convention of Human Rights which will need amending.

It should be made quite clear that those who have no intention to

INTEGRATE

-should be reminded of their commitment which they gave when they where granted immigration or asylum status (which should be a legal requirement in the future)

Unless drastic action is taken by the next Prime Minister as a priority , future generations of the indigenous population will find themselves foreigners in their own country with their religion and culture under growing  threat. The evidence is before our eyes it is a warning of what the future will bring if action is not taken

QUICKLY AND DECISIVELY

Those moderate Muslims will at last feel secure in the knowledge that they are safe from the extremist influence which up to now they have had it all their own way. By our commitment

IT WILL BE SECURITY THROUGH STRENGTH OF PURPOSE AND THE MUSLIMS WILL BE WITH US

Continue as NOW and they will have nothing but contempt for our indecision and inadequate moral integrity.]

*

To continue:

The sharp-suited, soft spoken undercover agents of the

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

-the banned Egyptian group whose former members include Osma Bin Laden -understand that power is best secured by

STEALTH

by infiltrating institutions and seducing the

MEDIA

Libya's Colonel Gaddafi once exemplified this policy

He said:

'There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe -without swords, without guns-without conquests. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.'

 

[AND THEY SURE MEAN IT]

 

 

[Our survival as a Christian nation can only be achieved by the Government reversing it's abhorrent legislation as to Religious freedom of speech and action because not to do so further emphasises to the extremist elements in our country that we are WEAK and AMORAL nation and therefore ready for conversion by stealth as their numbers obtain the victory while we ignore our Christian past at our peril.

Our close relations to America must be strengthened particularly in the moral arena so that our nations will gain the grudging respect of those who have a desire to replace our Christian heritage with their own.

There will be many who will say that we live in a secular environment and that the Government of the day should not concern itself but we have no choice we either support our Institutions and that includes our Christian inheritance which is ingrained into the very fabric of our nation or  lose that priceless heirloom the foundation of our IDENTITY and accept another more fanatical regime who do not believe in toleration but only in the observance of their one and only deliverer who will have no other faiths before it.

WE HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE

-because a vacuum must be filled and it is better that we know what contain.

The Choice Is Yours!

-but better it will be to retain our own heritage than be converted to another.]

*

But the violent extremists have provoked some signs of a backlash, not just among indigenous populations of Europe but among those tolerant immigrants who value the countries

THAT TOOK THEM IN

The Swedes, of all people, whom liberals claimed had produced a perfect society, are trying to row back on the

WELFARE STATE

-to encourage the

WORK ETHIC

and are demanding

THAT IMMIGRANTS INTEGRATE

 

Nyamko Sabuni a female, Muslim, African immigrant who is now the country's

INTEGRATION and EQUALITY

MINISTER

-insists that

ALL IMMIGRANTS

-should learn Swedish and find a job.

 

She is also intent on criminalising

FORCED MARRIAGES

CHECKING GIRLS FOR EVIDENCE OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION

and

BANNING THE VEIL

as well as

STATE FUNDING

for RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.

[This is an area that needs the new Premier Gordon Brown to put his attention as to make it plain that their is one

RULE OF LAW

in

ENGLAND

[NO EXCEPTIONS FOR MUSLIMS OR ANYONE ELSE IN OUR COUNTRY]

 

 

*          *          *

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

H.F.1294

 

ENGLAND MATTERS

   SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL
  DEATH OF A GIANT-A DAY TO REMEMBER
  ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE by ENOCK POWELL. - [23rd April]
  ST GEORGE`S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARES' BIRTHDAY  [23rd April]
  SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS
  Thoughts on St. George’s Day –Who are the English? - Part 1.
  Thoughts on St. George’s Day –Who are the English? - Part 2
  Our basic Liberties and Freedoms – to be surrendered to a Foreign Power? - Part I
  Our basic Liberties and Freedoms - to be surrendered to a Foreign Power? - Part II
  TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANAYSIS By NORRIS McWHIRTER - Least We Forget.
  Why can’t we have the right to be English? - Part 1
  Why can’t we have the right to be English? - Part 2
  DON'T LET THEM LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY.
  10 Reasons of how to destroy - our Nation.
   Petition to the Queen
  So You Thought You Were Free- By Vernon Coleman
  Could England Survive Outside The EU? -YES!
  Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution
  ‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’
  DON'T LET THEM LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY.
  A Voice from 1962 about the Common Market.
  Democracy without Morality and respect for Individuality is Despotism..
   A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 1.
  A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 2.
   A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 3.
  Why our English Self-Government is unique in Europe and the World.
   Almost everything, which is most precious in our Civilisation, has come from small States - Part 1
  Almost everything, which is most precious in our Civilisation, has come from small States - Part 2
  Our Past is embedded in our national consciousness-It asks were we came from and who we are.
  Why Members of Parliament must be restricted to one term of office to protect their Independence.
   Marriage is when two people become one. Cohabitation is when two people remain two.
   Canterbury Cathedral is not just a building, nor even just a cathedral. It is England in stone.
  A STORY OF SACRIFICE-THE SPITFIRE -ITS DESIGNER R.J.MITCHELL-A SAVIOUR OF THE SKIES OVER ENGLAND.
  THE BILL THAT COULD TURN THIS COUNTRY INTO A DICTATORSHIP
   'There'll always Be an ENGLAND' -NOT any MORE
  You Can't Seperate Politics and Morals.
  ENGLAND is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in BLAIR's  POLITICALLY -CORRECT ENGLAND
  SAVE YOUR ENGLAND-SAY NO TO THE EU REGIONS 
  WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT.
PT I
 

‘I say we must not join Europe’-
Field Marshall Viscount Montgomery.

 

OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?

  THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING -A CONSPIRACY to prevent the TRUTH emerging about Corruption and Treason in our country TODAY.
  THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

  MULTICULTURALISM HAS BETRAYED ENGLISH CULTURE SAYS ARCHBISHOP OF YORK
 

ENGLAND is ALREADY SECOND ONLY to HOLLAND as the MOST CROWDED COUNTRY IN EUROPE

  ENGLISH FREEDOM - WHY IT IS YOURS?
SAY 'NO' TO THE EU

 
 

CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP

 
 

Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.

  GOVERNMENT BY CONSENT BY JOHN GOURIET
 

 WHY WE NEED A PASSPORT TO FREEDOM

 

A Champion of Individualism from the late 19th century exposes the fallacies in collectivism and central planning.

   
   
   

 

H.F.1244/1 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

*

 

ENGLAND MATTERS

  ENGLAND'S DAY-23RD APRIL-ENGLAND'S DAY
  Understanding Easter- a part of our Christian cultural force which has made us what we are.
   Our Christian Festival of Easter which many know so little and some none.
  CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION
  THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY
  WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY
 

English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died

 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 1

 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 2

 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 3

 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 4

 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 5

 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 1

 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 2

 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 3

 

Christianity, The People, and Ethics - Part 1

 

Christianity, The People, and Ethics - Part 2

 

Alfred –Christian King of the English - Part 1

 

Alfred -Christian King of the English - Part 2

 

 Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty

 

A Defence of Christianity by a once militant agnostic - Part 1.

 

 Dangers of a supreme parliament.

 

 Who CARES about MORALITY?

 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 1.

 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 2.

 

 A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 3.

 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 4.

 

 A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 5.

 

Freedom of Speech-A Freedom, which cannot be abused - is not worth having.

 

Our Past is embedded in our national consciousness-It asks were we came from and who we are.

 

An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.

 

Blairland has almost destroyed the Family Values in its quest for supposed Equality.

 

Two loving parents are more important than good teachers.

 

Celebrate 700 years of Constitutional Development in 2007- from Edward 1 the English Justinian.

 

IMMIGRATION-THE BETRAYAL OF BRICK LANE BY MULTICULTURALISM INSTEAD OF INTEGRATION

 

 The Common Law Of England -Its Heritage and Importance to Parliamentary Democracy Today.

 

Home Rule For Scotland WHY NOT Home Rule For ENGLAND

 

NOR SHALL MY SWORD - THE REINVENTION OF ENGLAND

 

Robocop or Dixon of Dock Green -Millions of Pensioners will choose the latter. The true eyes and ears and friend of the Community.

 

THOUGHTS ON ST. GEORGE's DAY-FREEDOM

 

THE ENEMY EVERYWHERE

 

THOUSANDS OF ENGLISH/BRITISH CITIZENS
REJECTING EU CITIZENSHIP-
WHY DON'T YOU?

 

Free trade agreement.s are the future of world trade

 

THE VEIL – THE CROSS –A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 

ENGLAND'S PLACE IN THE UNION

 

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

 
 

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE - TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUITY- -NOT MULTICULTURAL.

 

Commonwealth Realms v The Constitution for Europe-PT 1- 4

 

DECLARATION OF RESISTANCE

 

 Free Speech - Religious Opinion

 

NO WHERE ELSE flies the White Ensign on top of its tower but the village with the Nelson Touch - As we would EXPECT.

   
   
   
   

 

H.F.1244/2 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
(Jeff )RENCE.COM  TRUTHCONTROL.COM/  

WHATDOESIT MEAN.COM

 

 

HUMANS ARE FREE

CLIMATE CHANGE A HOAX-TRUMP KNOWS IT-NOW YOU KNOW IT!

The Rothschilds.
 

ANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

 

THIS IS:

NOVEMBER FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017

 

BACK TO:

NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART1-2017

NOVEMBER FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017

NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART4-2017

NOVEMBER- FREEDOM NOW PART 3 -2017