ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG UK.

FREEDOM - UNITY.

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

SEP-19

OCT-19

 

 
BREXIT

ANNOUNCEMENT

ARTICLE 50 LETTER

DELIVERED BY

 'HER MAJESTY'S AMBASSADOR

TO

BRUSSELS

ON

MARCH 29-2017

*

ON

THE FINAL STRETCH

 TO

 FREEDOM

OF THE

PEOPLE AND NATION STATE OF

ENGLAND

[TIME ELAPSED SINCE REFERENDUM IN JUNE-2016

 8 MONTHS

 

MARCH-2017 - AUG-2019 (?)

 

MARCH 29, 2017.

 

 

 

* 

DAILY MAIL COMMENT asks who WILL speak for England? -FEBRUARY 3-2016

 of the most dramatic moments in the history of Parliamentary

democracy. ... Bowing to the mood of the House, Chamberlain

declared war on Hitler the next day. .... by 'England', like Amery

in 1939, we mean the whole of the United Kingdom)?

 

MARCH 29-2017

.H. F .1159 FREEDOM IS OURS!

 

 

Rothschilds surrender US Corporation bankrupt USA Republic accepts shared human destiny

 

Posted by benjamin

 

March 20, 2017

 

The Satan worshipping cabal suffered crushing defeats last week on all fronts multiple sources agree. The biggest news is that US President Donald Trump announced last week that the cabal owned United States Corporation founded in 1861 has been replaced with the Republic of the United States of America that was founded in 1776. For details on this see here:

http://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.jp/

That is why the talk of US government functions shutting down on March 15th as the US $20 trillion debt limit was reached failed to materialize. The debt belonged to the Corporation, not the Republic. The Corporation has been declared bankrupt and the debt null and void, multiple sources agree. That is because United States Corporation Secretary of State and slave to Corporation top shareholder David Rockefeller Jr. Rex Tillerson failed in his effort to get funding for it in Asia last week, Asian secret society sources say.

Japanese imperial family sources say Rockefeller bagman Henry Kissinger showed up with Rex Tillerson and both threatened the Imperial family in a failed effort to get them to cash a bogus 4京(kei) yen (40 trillion dollar) World Bank bond so that they could keep the US Corporation going and place their flunky Ichiro Ozawa as Prime Minister of Japan. Ozawa is despised in Japanese government circles and will not be allowed near the Prime Minister’s office so the request was denied, Japanese right wing sources say.

However, the US military is determined to get rid of current Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Finance Minister Taro Aso, who blocked the deal, because they are desperate for funds to keep their international operations going. That is why they are flooding the Japanese media with stories exposing Abe’s scandals. Abe represents a faction of extreme right wingers who wanted to start a war with China and so is definitely tainted goods as well and will likely be removed.

There are ongoing discussions over exactly who to replace Abe with and the White Dragon Society is recommending the relatively clean and competent Hideo Higashikokubaru as an interim Prime Minister who would represent the consensus of the Japanese bureaucracy and other power brokers. Asian secret society sources, for their part, say there is no alternative to Abe at present and so he must be given a new script to read. The discussions are ongoing.

The Rothschilds and the Rockefellers also tried to keep themselves from going bankrupt by taking over North Korea. North Korea is the location of a vast treasure of

 

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

 

Organized Crime
 

March 20, 2017

 

H.F.1158 FREEDOM IS AT HAND
     

     

     DAILY MAIL

     

     

     

     

    COMMENT-

     

     

    March 25-2017

     

     

     

    Happy birthday EU, and best of luck!


     

    [THEY WILL CERTAINLY NEED IT!]

    AS we stand

     

    at the crossroads, with only

    4 DAYS

    MARCH 29-2017

     

    to go before we trigger talks on

    SEPARATION

    the

    MAIL

    today sends warm greetings to the

    EUROPEAN UNION

    on its

    60th BIRTHDAY

    We look back fondly at the noble ideals that inspired the founding six nations-Belgium,

     

    France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and West Germany-to sign the TREATY of

     

    ROME on March 25,1957, bringing the infant European Economic Community into a

     

    war-weary world.

     

    What high hopes attended its birth! This they told us, was the dawn of a new age of

     

    peace and prosperity, in which former enemies would pull together for the common

     

    good.

     

    No wonder British governments wanted to be part of it, though 16 years would pass

     

    before we were admitted to the club.

     

    But if we had known then what we know today, would we have joined in 1973-or

     

    resolved to remain, by that 67 per cent majority, in the referendum two years later?

    THE ANSWER MUST SURELY BE NO!

    For the truth is that the organisation sold to voters as a tariff-free trading zone- the

    COMMON MARKET

    as it was known- has grown into a very different

    BEAST

    To be fair, the clue was in the first sentence of the

    TREATY of ROME

    which laid down the signatories' resolve to secure

     'an ever closer union among the

    peoples of Europe'

    This ambition went far beyond

    FREE TRADE

    It was a blueprint for a

    SUPRANATIONAL GOVERNMENT

    A

    A UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

    that would render the

    NATION STATE

    REDUNDANT

    and the wishes of individual people's, expressed through the

     BALLOT BOX

    increasingly irrelevant.

    As the original six members became 10-then12,15,25, and now 28-the EU became ever

     

    more unwieldy and less capable of adapting to a fast-changing world of emerging

     

    superpowers such as

     

    CHINA and INDIA.

    *

    At its heart sat a bloated, unaccountable bureaucracy in

    BRUSSELS

    spewing regulations as it pressed blindly ahead with unification, never mind the

    consequences.

    A crazy and cripplingly wasteful

    COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY

     

    pushed up food prices, supporting inefficient French farmers

    while brutally penalising the THIRD WORLD.

    Then came the disaster of the

    EURO

    whose catastrophic effects can be measured in blighted lives of a generation of young jobless throughout

    SOUTHERN EUROPE.

     

    Indeed, one statistic says it all. Since our partners adopted the euro in 1999, the UK's

    sterling-based economy has grown by

     

    39 PER CENT.

     

    Meanwhile, Italy, yoked into the one-size-fits-all currency, has barely grown.

    Yet still the march  towards enforced unity goes on, with a reckless

     

    OPEN BORDERS POLICY

    that has caused massive unease across the continent, leading to a resurgence of parties of the far RIGHT and LEFT.

     In this age of

    INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM

     

    which we were so viciously reminded this week, how much longer

    can Brussels persist in

     

    SUCH LETHAL FOLLY?

     

    Yet despite all this, politicians such

     

    as Lord Heseltine, too vain and

     

    proud to admit

     

    THEY WERE WRONG

    keep insisting that the creaking monolith of the EU represents the future, while spreading

    DOOM and GLOOM

    about Britain's prospects as a

    SOVEREIGN DEMOCRACY

    ONCE AGAIN.

     

    Yes, there are tough talks ahead-and no doubt economic troubles

    too, as the business cycle turns. But with PROJECT FEAR'S

    prophesies so far proving utterly groundless, and countries such

    as

     INDIA and US

    queuing up

    TO DO BUSINESS WITH UK

    this paper looks ahead with

    GREAT CONFIDENCE

    On the EU's 60th, therefore, the Mail wishes nothing but well to our soon-to-be ex partners, They needn't worry about the UK as we set off on the road back to

    FREEDOM.

     

    But if the EU continues to

     

     

    RESIST REFORM,

     

    goodness, we fear for

     

    THEM.

     

    ONE-TENTH of all convicted jihadis come from a single.

    small area of

     

    BIRMINGHAM

     

    The politicians have opened the floodgates to mass immigration without insisting on integration.

    They pretend every culture, no matter how medieval and barbaric, is worthy of equal respect. They

    permitted foreign hate preachers from cruel theocracies to set up shop here, peddling their doctrine

    of violence and divisioIn pursuit of votes, they are in thrall to self-appointed 'community leaders' who

    take our money but reject our freedoms. As a result, it is possible to spend your entire life here

    without ever subscribing to one of our traditional values, such as tolerance of those with different

    religious beliefs.

    Many young Muslims grow up hating the

     

    COUNTRY THAT GAVE THEM

     

     EVERYTHING ...

     

    Full article

     

    *  *  *

     

    [IN the1975 Referendum we were not taken in by the LIES and DECEIT of No 10 and voted

    NO!

    as we have always believed  that ENGLAND should always remain a FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE and have persisted in this view to the present day and beyond. In 1994 after belonging  to a number of Freedom Organizations we decided to enter the political arena and stood for election in the General Election of 1997 and in the European Election in 1999.  It is our view that the FUNDAMENTALS of our CONSTITUTION should be entrenched within our existing constitutional framework to PREVENT any further traitors from departing from the SPIRIT of TRUE CONSTITUTION which PROTECTS those ENGLISH FREEDOMS which are the TRUE INHERITANCE of FUTURE GENERATIONS. IT IS A SACRED COMPACT between the PAST and PRESENT and FUTURE.]

    *
    LIES and DECEIT

    EXPOSED in 2001

    IN

    STRANGE CASE OF THE WERNER REPORT

     

    Mr Macmillan in 1961

     

    Mr Heath and 1970

     

    Mrs Thatcher and 1985

     

    FROM Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

     

    THE PRICE WE HAVE PAID

     

    EPILOGUE

     

H.F.1157 FREEDOM WILL SOON BE OURS!

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

NDEX - MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

LATEST! IN PART 2-(March 7)

 

Quentin Letts 

-Yesterday in Parliament.

[1295 -1972 

(CAPTIVITY WITHIN THE NAZI PLANNED FOURTH REICH)-

March 16 - 2017 ...]

 

Dear EU,

DAILY MAIL-Quentin Letts-Dear EU, we're off now, love from the people of the UK

LACKLUSTRE exchanges between the Leader of the House and his Shadow were interupted by the Speaker, John Bercow. He had an announcement to savour.

The hour, by the Commons digital clock, was 10.46 and 16 seconds.

'Order, Just before we proceed with the Business Question I have to notify the house, in accordance with the

ROYAL ASSENT ACT 1967

that Her Majesty has signified

HER ROYAL ASSENT

to the following Acts...

The Remain-voting Speaker continued, with apparent boredom:

'Supply and Appropriation (Anticipation and Adjustments) Act 2017;

EUROPEAN UNION

(NOTIFICATION OF WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2017.

 

Full article

 

[COMMENT S IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1149 FREEDOM -FULL STEAM AHEAD!

 were off now, love from the people of the UK.

* * *
WHERE DID SHE GET THE HAT?

A DAY TO REMEMBER

We saw MRS May in her new head apparel we became aware that the spirit of an IRON LADY was again alive in our Brittanic land.

As in the past, when it was necessay to protect her own, in PEACE and WAR

then Britania would again Rule the Waves to protect HER OWN wherever THEY MAY BE.

AS in the recent past we are again in a BATTLE to recover our PAST.

WE face a time of UNCERTAINTY yet our HISTORY has shown on many occasions that even a TEMPORARY SET-BACK leads inevitably to VICTORY.

We have been many times in our LONG HISTORY experienced the THREAT from across the soon to be returned ENGLISH CHANNEL which has as in the days when we had a WOODEN WALL protecting our then FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the days of ALFRED the GREAT through the ELISABETHAN TIME and from a number of attempted INVASIONS since.

But we must REMEMBER that our OWN PARLIAMENT allowed our GREATEST ENEMY GERMANY who after we had suffered TWO WORLD WARS from HER HANDS permitted our FREE NATION STATE in 1972 to sign an ACT of SURRENDER we would call it TREASON which will be finally ERADICATED from our COMMONS JOURNAL within the NEXT FEW DAYS.

At this crucial time in our NATIONS HISTORY we  must remember WHO WE ARE and WHAT WE ARE as a PEOPLE and the message from the past from the TIME of the HEROIC ALFRED the GREAT to the REIGN of our QUEEN BESS- ELISABETH THE FIRST of ENGLAND  who at the sign of an INVADER spoke the words that inspired HER PEOPLE:

 

Elizabeth reviewed her troops at Tilbury.

'My loving people,' she said, we have been persuaded by some that are careful of our safety to take head how we commit ourselves to armed multitudes, for fear of treachery; but I assure you I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful and loving people

LET TYRANTS FEAR!

I have always so behaved myself that , under God, I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects; and therefore am I come amongst you, as you see,

AT THIS TIME

-to lay down my life for my God

AND FOR MY KINGDOM

and for

MY PEOPLE

MY HONOUR

and

MY BLOOD

even in the dust.

I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble women;

BUT I HAVE A HEART OF A KING

and of a

KING of ENGLAND

too, and I think foul scorn that Parma or Spain,

or any

PRINCE of EUROPE

SHOULD DARE TO INVADE THE BORDERS OF MY REALM.'

[S.R. Gardiner-Outline of English History

 to more recent times when a VOICE of DETERMINATION from our greatest WAR LEADER -WINSTON CHURCHILL inspired the NATION with his momentous stirring SPEECH:

You ask, What is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory-victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. May 1940 .

*

FREEDOM

All we have of freedom-all we use and know-This our Fathers bought for us, long and long ago

Kipling. The Old Issue

*

We must be free or die, who speak the tongue

That Shakespeare spoke; the faith and morals hold

Which Milton held.

Wordsworth. Sonnets

*

MARCH 14 - 2017

TREASON

Conservative skulduggery

BACK in 1972 -Tories desert to EU camp

SHORT-TERM SELF-INTEREST EXPLOITED

The UK Accession Bill passed its Third reading on 13th July 1972 by a majority of 17.

Earlier, the debate on the Second reading had lasted for four days (16-19 February), with the Labour Party then officially committed to opposing the legislation. BUT, as happened with the Maastricht Bill two decades later, as Christopher Booker and Richard North observe, 'faced with the possible collapse of their Government, most of the Conservative 'anti-marketeers gritted their teeth' (treacherously, short-sighted and very foolishly -Ed.) 'and walked through the 'aye' lobby. Despite that, 15 Tories voted with the Opposition. TRAITOR

Edward Heath

 got his vote, but only by a water-thin margin:

309 to 301'.

 

 

Tony Benn MP commented after the passage of the Third Reading that

 ‘it was a coup d’etat by a political class who did not believe in popular sovereignty’.

 

Actually, it was worse than that .\It was the start of a coup d’etat by installments’ by a corrupted political class initially led by two operatives-Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon,

 both of whom were recruited German agents  (like Lenin, Rasputin and Lavrentii Beria in the Soviet context, before them) who signed the UK Accession Treaty in exchange for corrupt payments.  Both lied to the British people; and the authors specifically identified one of Geoffrey Rippon’ s worst lies, associated with the alienation of Britain’s fishing waters, the richest in the world.  Here it is worth citing the whole of the authors’ relevant paragraph:

 ‘Desperate to hide how much had been conceded[over fisheries], Geoffrey Rippon…said:

 ‘I must emphasise that these are not just transitional arrangements [in the relevant context, allegedly beneficial to the British fisheries-Ed.]

 which automatically lapse at the end of a fixed period’.  This claim drew fierce challenge from Dennis Healey and Peter Shore[later Lord Shore –further details on EDP bulletin board] both of whom suspected he was lying. 

 What neither had yet seen was the wording of the UK Accession Treaty, which MP’s would not be allowed to examine until after the treaty was signed a month later.  Only when this became available [and Heath and Rippon had accepted their bribes-Ed.]  was it clear that Rippon had told a blatant lie’. [Booker and North, op.cit., page 155]

 International Currency Review

 October 10-2005

 Notes and References:

 ‘Obituary of Sir Edward Heath, the Prime Minister who took Britain into the EEC and presided over constant turmoil at home’,

1. The Daily Telegraph, 18th July 2005.

This was probably the rudest obituary of a prominent UK statesman ever to have appeared in print.  Even so, it omitted any reference to Heath’s recruitment by German (Nazi) intelligence.   However , there are many [coded] references in this obituary, not least the three telling words:

‘He never married’, which observers accurately interpret as meaning that he was homosexual, and therefore an obvious recruitment/blackmail target.

 

2. The Daily Telegraph, 24th July 2005,

 

Christopher Booker (Column),

 

International Currency Review

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 A PATRIOT AND TRUTH-SEEKER

The EDP received in 2005 vital information on the EU from Mr Christopher Story which enabled the EDP to mount a continuing offensive to spread the TRUTH of the EVILS of such a BEAST! which came into existence through LIES! and DECEIT! and as Mr Story has stated in VOLUME 30 NUMBER 4 -the TWIN EVILS of the EU are:-

COLLECTIVISATION AND CORRUPTION.

[What the REMAINERS failed to understand]

These two evils always go together: they did so under overt Communism, when the whole world saw how corrupt the Communist nomenclature was: and they go together under covert communism, notably the version manifested by the

 

 THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE [ 26 ]  .

 

EACH LETTER ABOVE HAS A CHRISTOPHER STORY BULLETIN-TOTAL 26

which the top Soviet intelligence operative Mikhail Gorbachev described on 23rd March 2000, as 'the new European Soviet' It is accordingly a conspicuous waste of time for well-meaning national policymakers, and for the rapidly dwindling class of Euro-ideologues to recommend 'reform' of the EU INSTITUTIONS. They are incapable of reform, because, as we reveal exclusively in this issue, they are born of CORRUPTION- and because the TREATIES that 'sustain' them were procured by means of CORRUPT 'BLack' payments.'

*

More!

 
 

H.F.1150 FREEDOM NOW

H.F.1144 FREEDOM NOW

*  *  *

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

DECEMBER23-BREXIT NOW-2017--       - (1994 -Official Website-MARCH-2017 ) -   JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017-PT1 -

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

 

 

A FAMILY FEUD?

We have the Scottish PM acting like a spoilt child in a loving family-Well! to be frank, there have been many times when no love was lost between them and other members of the Island Family. But we would have thought that having fought together against a common enemy

GERMANY

 in

TWO WORLD WARS

and considering the importance of our close relationship for our SECURITY and WELL-BEING and our PROSPERITY that it was about time the childish antics of the Spokeswomen of our northern NATION STATE should be consigned to the playpen as it is of vital shared interest of ALL who share our ISLAND HOME that :

WE MUST WORK TOGETHER

WE NEED EACH OTHER

 WE ARE STRONGER AND MORE SECURE TOGETHER.

We should not have to remind our neighbours beyond the NORTHERN BORDER that they cherished their FREEDOM and INDEPENDENCE

and

'We fight not for glory

nor for wealth, nor for honour but for that freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.'

(From the Arbroath Manifesto-sent by the Nobles and Commons of Scotland to the Pope in 1320.)

*

WE are at a loss to understand how a known people of courage and of independent spirit who have conquered such a great deal of the world with such love of freedom can possibly jeopardise the lives and prosperity of those who share the land of Britannia  to trade and be governed by a known

corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic-unaccountable so-called

EUROPEAN UNION

the brain-child of

ADOLF HITLER

 in 1942

, instead of joining with HER PARTNERS in THEIR SHARED HOME to TRADE with the WORLD at LARGE as we have ALL been ACCUSTOMED throughout our SHARED occupation of our

 BRITISH ISLES.]

THE EYES OF THE WORLD ARE WATCHING,

IS IT TO BE

LOYALTY!

OR

DISLOYALTY.

TO A SHARED

ISLAND HOME.

*

MARCH 19-2017

 

H.F.1048 FREEDOM WILL SOON BE OURS!-IT CAN BE YOURS!

*

HOW PETTY IS THE ABOVE SITUATION COMPARED WITH WHAT FOLLOWS?

 

Rothschilds surrender US Corporation bankrupt USA Republic accepts shared human destiny

 

Posted by benjamin

March 20, 2017
 

The Satan worshipping cabal suffered crushing defeats last week on all fronts multiple sources agree. The biggest news is that US President Donald Trump announced last week that the cabal owned United States Corporation founded in 1861 has been replaced with the Republic of the United States of America that was founded in 1776. For details on this see here:

http://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.jp/

That is why the talk of US government functions shutting down on March 15th as the US $20 trillion debt limit was reached failed to materialize. The debt belonged to the Corporation, not the Republic. The Corporation has been declared bankrupt and the debt null and void, multiple sources agree. That is because United States Corporation Secretary of State and slave to Corporation top shareholder David Rockefeller Jr. Rex Tillerson failed in his effort to get funding for it in Asia last week, Asian secret society sources say.

Japanese imperial family sources say Rockefeller bagman Henry Kissinger showed up with Rex Tillerson and both threatened the Imperial family in a failed effort to get them to cash a bogus 4京(kei) yen (40 trillion dollar) World Bank bond so that they could keep the US Corporation going and place their flunky Ichiro Ozawa as Prime Minister of Japan. Ozawa is despised in Japanese government circles and will not be allowed near the Prime Minister’s office so the request was denied, Japanese right wing sources say.

However, the US military is determined to get rid of current Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Finance Minister Taro Aso, who blocked the deal, because they are desperate for funds to keep their international operations going. That is why they are flooding the Japanese media with stories exposing Abe’s scandals. Abe represents a faction of extreme right wingers who wanted to start a war with China and so is definitely tainted goods as well and will likely be removed.

There are ongoing discussions over exactly who to replace Abe with and the White Dragon Society is recommending the relatively clean and competent Hideo Higashikokubaru as an interim Prime Minister who would represent the consensus of the Japanese bureaucracy and other power brokers. Asian secret society sources, for their part, say there is no alternative to Abe at present and so he must be given a new script to read. The discussions are ongoing.

The Rothschilds and the Rockefellers also tried to keep themselves from going bankrupt by taking over North Korea. North Korea is the location of a vast treasure of

 

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

 

Organized Crime
 
Posted by benjamin
March 20, 2017
  

 

 

H.F.1153 FREEDOM IS NIGH!

 

*
 
 

A TIME TO THINK!

 

 

"To many Islamic nations, freedom is no*t a tonic, but a toxin; it's regarded not just as something that permits a challenge to faith, but is a challenge to faith by itself. 

"To Westerners, the value of concepts like truth, life and liberty remains constant, writ in stone, whether our best efforts successfully earn that value or not. But many Westerners like myself watch events unfold in the Islamic world with the inching realization that the value it places on those concepts remains utterly fluid, seemingly shaped by convenience and circumstance. 

"Even reason itself appears subject to sacrifice; some of the most cognitively dissonant images to come out of the controversy are protest signs with messages like, 'Behead those who say Islam is violent'." -- Andrew Steven Harris
"There are only two means by which men can deal with one another: guns or logic.  Force or persuasion.  Those who know that they cannot win by means of logic, have always resorted to guns."
-
excerpts from
Faith and Force: The Destroyers of the Modern World
by Ayn Rand

(A lecture delivered at Yale University on February 17, 1960, at Brooklyn College on April 4, 1960, and at Columbia University on May 5, 1960.
Published as a pamphlet by the Nathaniel Branden Institute in 1967,
and now included as a chapter in the book, Philosophy: Who Needs It )
_____

[...]

  ... The three values which men held for centuries and which have now collapsed are: mysticism, collectivism, altruism.  Mysticism -- as a cultural power -- died at the time of the Renaissance.  Collectivism -- as a political ideal -- died in World War II.  As to altruism -- it has never been alive.  It is the poison of death in the blood of Western civilization, and men survived it only to the extent to which they neither believed nor practiced it.  But it has caught up with them -- and that is the killer which they now have to face and to defeat. That is the basic choice they have to make.  If any civilization is to survive, it is the morality of altruism that men have to reject.

  ... Yes, this is an age of moral crisis. ...  Your moral code has reached its climax, the blind alley at the end of its course.  And if you wish to go on living, what you now need is not to return to morality, but to discover it.

     What is morality?  It is a code of values to guide man's choices and actions -- the choices which determine the purpose and the course of his life.  It is a code by means of which he judges what is right or wrong, good or evil.

     What is the morality of altruism?  The basic principle of altruism is that man has no right to live for his own sake, that service to others is the only justification of his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, virtue and value.

     Do not confuse altruism with kindness, good will or respect for the rights of others.  These are not primaries, but consequences, which, in fact, altruism makes impossible.  The irreducible primary of altruism, the basic absolute, is self-sacrifice -- which means: self-immolation, self-abnegation, self-denial, self-destruction --- which means: the self as a standard of evil, the selfless as the standard of the good.

     Do not hide behind such superficialities as whether you should or should not give a dime to a beggar.  That is not the issue.  The issue is whether you do or do not have the right to exist without giving him that dime.  The issue is whether you must keep buying your life, dime by dime, from any beggar who might choose to approach you.  The issue is whether the need of others is the first mortgage on your life and the moral purpose of your existence.  The issue is whether man is to be regarded as a sacrificial animal.  Any man of self-esteem will answer: "No."  Altruism says: "Yes."

     Now there is one word -- a single word -- which can blast the morality of altruism out of existence and which it cannot withstand -- the word: "Why?"  Why must man live for the sake of others? Why must he be a sacrificial animal?  Why is that the good?  There is no earthly reason for it -- and, ladies and gentlemen, in the whole history of philosophy no earthly reason has ever been given.

     It is only mysticism that can permit moralists to get away with it.  It was mysticism, the unearthly, the supernatural, the irrational that has always been called upon to justify it -- or, to be exact, to escape the necessity of justification.  One does not justify the irrational, one just takes it on faith.  What most moralists -- and few of their victims -- realize is that reason and altruism are incompatible.  And this is the basic contradiction of Western civilization: reason versus altruism.  This is the conflict that had to explode sooner or later.

     The real conflict, of course, is reason versus mysticism.  But if it weren't for the altruist morality, mysticism would have died when it did die -- at the Renaissance -- leaving no vampire to haunt Western culture.  A "vampire" is supposed to be a dead creature that comes out of its grave only at night -- only in the darkness -- and drains the blood of the living.  The description, applied to altruism, is exact.

     Western civilization was the child and product of reason -- via ancient Greece.  In all other civilizations, reason has always been the menial servant -- the handmaiden -- of mysticism.  You may observe the results.  It is only Western culture that has ever been dominated -- imperfectly, incompletely, precariously and at rare intervals -- but still, dominated by reason.  You may observe the results of that.

     The conflict of reason versus mysticism is the issue of life or death -- of freedom or slavery -- of progress or stagnant brutality.  Or, to put it another way, it is the conflict of consciousness versus unconsciousness.

     Let us define our terms.  What is reason?  Reason is the faculty which perceives, identifies and integrates the material provided by man's senses.  Reason integrates man's perceptions by means of forming abstractions or conceptions, thus raising man's knowledge from the perceptual level, which he shares with animals, to the conceptual level, which he alone can reach. The method which reason employs in this process is logic -- and logic is the art of non-contradictory identification.   What is mysticism?   Mysticism is the acceptance of allegations without evidence or proof, either apart from or against the evidence of one's senses and one's reason.  Mysticism is the claim to some non-sensory, non-rational, non-definable, non-identifiable means of knowledge, such as "instinct," "intuition," "revelation,' or any form of "just knowing."

     Reason is the perception of reality, and rests on a single axiom: the Law of Identity.

     Mysticism is the claim to the perception of some other reality -- other than the one in which we live -- whose definition is only that it is not natural, it is supernatural, and is to be perceived by some form of unnatural or supernatural means.

     You realize, of course, that epistemology -- the theory of knowledge -- is the most complex branch of philosophy, which cannot be covered exhaustively in a single lecture.  So I will not attempt to cover it.  I will say only that those who wish a fuller discussion will find it in Atlas Shrugged.  For the purposes of tonight's discussion, the definitions I have given you contain the essence of the issue, regardless of whose theory, argument or philosophy you choose to accept.

     I will repeat: Reason is the faculty which perceives, identifies and integrates the material provided by man's senses. Mysticism is the claim to a non-sensory means of knowledge.

     In Western civilization, the period ruled by mysticism is known as the Dark Ages and the Middle Ages.  I will assume that you know the nature of that period and the state of human existence in those ages.  The Renaissance broke the rule of the mystics.  "Renaissance" means "rebirth."  Few people today will care to remind you that it was a rebirth of reason -- of man's mind.

     In the light of what followed -- most particularly, in the light of the industrial revolution -- nobody can now take faith, or religion, or revelation, or any form of mysticism as his basic and exclusive guide to existence, not in the way it was taken in the Middle Ages.  This does not mean that the Renaissance has automatically converted everybody to rationality; far from it.  It means only that so long as a single automobile, a single skyscraper or a single copy of Aristotle's Logic remains in existence, nobody will be able to arouse men's hope, eagerness and joyous enthusiasm by telling them to ditch their minds and rely on mystic faith.  This is why I said that mysticism, as a cultural power, is dead.  Observe that in the attempts at a mystic revival today, it is not an appeal to life, hope and joy that the mystics are making, but an appeal to fear, doom and despair.  "Give up, your mind is impotent, life is only a foxhole," is not a motto that can revive a culture.

     Now, if you ask me to name the man most responsible for the present state of the world, the man whose influence has almost succeeded in destroying the achievements of the Renaissance -- I will name Immanuel Kant.  He was the philosopher who saved the morality of altruism, and who knew that what it had to be saved from was -- reason.

     This is not a mere hypothesis.  It is a known historical fact that Kant's interest and purpose in philosophy was to save the morality of altruism, which could not survive without a mystic base.  His metaphysics and his epistemology were devised for that purpose.  He did not, of course, announce himself as a mystic -- few of them have, since the Renaissance.  He announced himself as a champion of reason -- of "pure" reason.

     There are two ways to destroy the power of a concept:  one, by an open attack in open discussion -- the other, by subversion, from the inside; that is: by subverting the meaning of the concept, setting up a straw man and then refuting it.  Kant did the second.  He did not attack reason -- he merely constructed such a version of what is reason that it made mysticism look like plain, rational common sense by comparison.  He did not deny the validity of reason -- he merely claimed that reason is "limited," that it leads us to impossible contradictions, that everything we perceive is an illusion and that we can never perceive reality or "things as they are."  He claimed, in effect, that the things we perceive are not real, because we perceive them.

     A "straw man" is an odd metaphor to apply to such an enormous, cumbersome, ponderous construction as Kant's system of epistemology.  Nevertheless, a straw man is what it was -- and the doubts, the uncertainty, the skepticism that followed, skepticism about man's ability ever to know anything, were not, in fact, applicable to human consciousness, because it was not a human consciousness that Kant's robot represented.  But philosophers accepted it as such.  And while they cried that reason had been invalidated, they did not notice that reason had been pushed off the philosophical scene altogether and that the faculty they were arguing about was not reason.

     No, Kant did not destroy reason; he merely did as thorough a job of undercutting as anyone could ever do.

     If you trace the roots of all our current philosophies -- such as Pragmatism, Logical Positivism, and all the rest of the neo-mystics who announce happily that you cannot prove that you exist -- you will find that they all grew out of Kant.

     As to Kant's version of the altruist morality, he claimed that it was derived from "pure reason," not from revelation -- except that it rested on a special instinct for duty, a "categorical imperative" which one "just knows." His version of morality makes the Christian one sound like a healthy, cheerful, benevolent code of selfishness.  Christianity merely told man to love his neighbor as himself;  that's not exactly rational -- but at least it does not forbid man to love himself.  What Kant propounded was full, total, abject selflessness: he held that an action is moral only if you perform it out of a sense of duty and derive no benefit from it of any kind, neither material nor spiritual; if you derive any benefit, your action is not moral any longer.  This is the ultimate form of demanding that man turn himself into a "shmoo" -- the mystic little animal of the Li'l Abner comic strip, that went around seeking to be eaten by somebody.

     It is Kant's version of altruism that is generally accepted today, not practiced -- who can practice it? -- but guiltily accepted.  It is Kant's version of altruism that people, who have never heard of Kant, profess when they equate self-interest with evil.  It is Kant's version of altruism that's working whenever people are afraid to admit the pursuit of any personal pleasure or gain or motive -- whenever men are afraid to confess that they are seeking their own happiness -- whenever businessmen are afraid to say that they are making profits -- whenever the victims of an advancing dictatorship are afraid to assert their "selfish" rights.

     The ultimate monument to Kant and to the whole altruist morality is Soviet Russia.

     If you want to prove to yourself the power of ideas and, particularly, of morality -- the intellectual history of the nineteenth century would be a good example to study.  The greatest, unprecedented, undreamed of events and achievements were taking place before men's eyes -- but men did not see them and did not understand their meaning, as they do not understand it to this day.  I am speaking of the industrial revolution, of the United States and of capitalism.  For the first time in history, men gained control over physical nature and threw off the control of men over men -- that is: men discovered science and political freedom.  The creative energy, the abundance, the wealth, the rising standard of living for every level of the population were such that the nineteenth century looks like fiction-Utopia, like a blinding burst of sunlight, in the drab progression of most of human history.  If life on earth is one's standard of value, then the nineteenth century moved mankind forward more than all the other centuries combined.

     Did anyone appreciate it?  Does anyone appreciate it now?  Has anyone identified the causes of that historical miracle?

     They did not and have not.  What blinded them?  The morality of altruism.

     Let me explain this.  There are, fundamentally, only two causes of the progress of the nineteenth century -- the same two causes which you will find at the root of any happy, benevolent, progressive era in human history.  One cause is psychological, the other existential -- or: one pertains to man's consciousness, the other to the physical conditions of his existence.  The first is reason, the second is freedom.  And when I say "freedom," I do not mean poetic sloppiness, such as "freedom from want" or "freedom from fear" or "freedom from the necessity of earning a living."  I mean "freedom from compulsion -- freedom from rule by physical force."  Which means: political freedom.

     These two -- reason and freedom -- are corollaries, and their relationship is reciprocal: when men are rational, freedom wins; when men are free, reason wins.

     Their antagonists are: faith and force.  These, also, are corollaries: every period of history dominated by mysticism, was a period of statism, of dictatorship, of tyranny.  Look at the Middle Ages -- and look at the political systems of today.

    The nineteenth century was the ultimate product and expression of the intellectual trend of the Renaissance and the Age of Reason, which means: of a predominantly Aristotelian philosophy.  And, for the first time in history, it created a new economic system, the necessary corollary of political freedom, a system of free trade on a free market: capitalism.

     No, it was not a full, perfect, unregulated, totally laissez-faire capitalism -- as it should have been.  Various degrees of government interference and control still remained, even in America -- and this is what led to the eventual destruction of capitalism.  But the extent to which certain countries were free was the exact extent of their economic progress.  America, the freest, achieved the most.

     Never mind the low wages and harsh living conditions of the early years of capitalism.  They were all that the national economies of the time could afford.  Capitalism did not create poverty -- it inherited it.  Compared to the centuries of pre-capitalist starvation, the living conditions of the poor in the early years of capitalism were the first chance the poor had ever had to survive.  As proof -- the enormous growth of the European population during the nineteenth century, a growth of over 300 percent, as compared to the previous growth of something like 3 percent per century.

     Now why was this not appreciated?  Why did capitalism, the truly magnificent benefactor of mankind, arouse nothing but resentment, denunciations and hatred, then and now?  Why did the so-called defenders of capitalism keep apologizing for it, then and now?  Because, ladies and gentlemen, capitalism and altruism are incompatible.

     Make no mistake about it -- and tell it to your Republican friends: capitalism and altruism cannot coexist in the same man or in the same society.

     Tell it to anyone who attempts to justify capitalism on the ground of the "public good" or the "general welfare" or "service to society" or the benefit it brings to the poor.  All these things are true, but they are the by-products, the secondary consequences of capitalism -- not its goal, purpose or moral justification.  The moral justification of capitalism is man's right to exist for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself; it is the recognition that man -- every man -- is an end in himself, not a means to the ends of others, not a sacrificial animal serving anyone's need.

     There is a tragic, twisted sort of compliment to mankind involved in this issue: in spite of all their irrationalities, inconsistencies, hypocrisies and evasions, the majority of men will not act, in major issues, without a sense of being morally right  and will not oppose the morality they have accepted.  They will break it, they will cheat on it, but they will not oppose it; and when they break it, they take the blame on themselves.  The power of morality is the greatest of all intellectual powers -- and mankind's tragedy lies in the fact that the vicious moral code men have accepted destroys them by means of the best within them.

     So long as altruism was their moral ideal, men had to regard capitalism as immoral; capitalism certainly does not and cannot work on the principle of selfless service and sacrifice.  This was the reason why the majority of the nineteenth-century intellectuals regarded capitalism as a vulgar, uninspiring, materialistic necessity of this earth, and continued to long for their unearthly moral ideal.  From the start, while capitalism was creating the splendour of its achievements, creating it in silence, unacknowledged and undefended (morally undefended), the intellectuals were moving in greater and greater numbers towards a new dream: socialism.

     Just as a small illustration of how ineffectual a defense of capitalism was offered by its most famous advocates, let me mention that the British socialists, the Fabians, were predominantly students and admirers of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham.

     The socialists had a certain kind of logic on their side; if the collective sacrifice of all to all is the moral ideal, then they wanted to establish this ideal in practice, here and on this earth.    The arguments that socialism would not and could not work, did not stop them: neither has altruism ever worked, but this has not caused men to stop and question it.  Only reason can ask such questions -- and reason, they were told on all sides, has nothing to do with morality, morality lies outside the realm of reason, no rational morality can ever be defined.

     The fallacies and contradictions in the economic theories of socialism were exposed and refuted time and time again, in the nineteenth century as well as today.  This did not and does not stop anyone; it is not an issue of economics, but of morality.  The intellectuals and the so-called idealists were determined to make socialism work.  How? By that magic means of all irrationalists: somehow.

     It was not the tycoons of big business, it was not the working classes, it was the intellectuals who reversed the trend toward political freedom and revived the doctrines of the absolute State, of totalitarian government rule, of the government's right to control the lives of the citizens in any manner it pleases.  This time, it was not in the name of the "divine right of kings," but in the name of the divine right of the masses.  The basic principle was the same: the right to enforce at the point of a gun the moral doctrines of whoever happens to seize control of the machinery of government.

     There are only two means by which men can deal with one another: guns or logic.  Force or persuasion.  Those who know that they cannot win by means of logic, have always resorted to guns.

     Well, ladies and gentlemen, the socialists got their dream.  They got it in the twentieth century and they got it in triplicate, plus a great many lesser carbon copies; they got it in every possible form and variant, so that now there can be no mistake about its nature: Soviet Russia -- Nazi Germany -- Socialist England.

   This was the collapse of the modern intellectuals' most cherished tradition.  It was World War II that destroyed collectivism as a political ideal.  Oh, yes, people still mouth its slogans, by routine, by social conformity and by default -- but it is not a moral crusade any longer.  It is an ugly, horrifying reality -- and part of the modern intellectuals' guilt is the knowledge that they have created it.  They have seen for themselves the bloody slaughterhouse which they had once greeted as a noble experiment -- Soviet Russia.  They have seen Nazi Germany -- and they know that "Nazi" means "National Socialism."  Perhaps the worst blow to them, the greatest disillusionment, was Socialist England: here was their literal dream, a bloodless socialism, where force was not used for murder, only for expropriation, where lives were not taken, only the products, the meaning and the future of lives, here was a country that had not been murdered, but had voted itself into suicide.  Most of the modern intellectuals, even the more evasive ones, have now understood what socialism -- or any form of political and economic collectivism -- actually means.

     Today, their perfunctory advocacy of collectivism is as feeble, futile and evasive as the alleged conservatives' defense of capitalism.  The fire and the moral fervor have gone out of it.  And when you hear the liberals mumble that Russia is not really socialistic, or that it was all Stalin's fault, or that socialism never had a real chance in England, or that what they advocate is something that's different somehow -- you know that you are hearing the voices of men who haven't a leg to stand on, men who are reduced to some vague hope that "somehow my gang would have done it better."

     The secret dread of modern intellectuals, liberals and conservatives alike, the un-admitted terror at the root of their anxiety, which all of their current irrationalities are intended to stave off and to disguise, is the un-stated knowledge that Soviet Russia is the full, actual, literal, consistent embodiment of the morality of altruism, that Stalin did not corrupt a noble ideal, that this is the only way altruism has to be or can ever be practiced.  If service and self-sacrifice are a moral ideal, and if the "selfishness" of human nature prevents men from leaping into sacrificial furnaces, there is no reason -- no reason that a mystic moralist could name -- why a dictator should not push them in at the point of bayonets -- for their own good, or the good of humanity, or the good of posterity, or the good of the latest bureaucrat's five-year plan.  There is no reason that they can name to oppose any atrocity.  The value of a man's life?  His right to exist?  His right to pursue his own happiness?  These are concepts that belong to individualism and capitalism -- to the antithesis of the altruist morality.

     Twenty years ago the conservatives were uncertain, evasive, morally disarmed before the aggressive moral self-righteousness of the liberals.  Today, both are uncertain, evasive, morally disarmed before the aggressiveness of the communists.  It is not a moral aggressiveness any longer, it is the plain aggressiveness of a thug -- but what disarms the modern intellectuals is the secret realization that a thug is the inevitable, ultimate and only product of their cherished morality.

     I have said that faith and force are corollaries, and that mysticism will always lead to the rule of brutality.  The cause of it is contained in the very nature of mysticism.  Reason is the only objective means of communication and of understanding among men; when men deal with one another by means of reason, reality is their objective standard and frame of reference.  But when men claim to possess supernatural means of knowledge, no persuasion, communication or understanding are impossible.  Why do we kill wild animals in the jungle?  Because no other way of dealing with them is open to us.  And that is the state to which mysticism reduces mankind -- a state where, in case of disagreement, men have no recourse except to physical violence.  And more: no man or mystical elite can hold a whole society subjugated to their arbitrary assertions, edicts and whims, without the use of force.  Anyone who resorts to the formula: "It's so, because I say so," will have to reach for a gun, sooner or later.  Communists, like all materialists, are neo-mystics: it does not matter whether one rejects the mind in favor of revelations or in favor of conditioned reflexes.  The basic premise and the results are the same.

     Such is the nature of the evil which modern intellectuals have helped to let loose in the world -- and such is the nature of their guilt.

- - - - -

     Since "challenge" is your slogan, I will say that if you are looking for a challenge, you are facing the greatest one in history.  A moral revolution is the most difficult, the most demanding, the most radical form of rebellion, but that is the task to be done today, if you choose to accept it.  When I say "radical," I mean it in its literal and reputable sense: fundamental.  Civilization does not have to perish.  The brutes are winning only by default.  But in order to fight them to the finish and with full rectitude, it is the altruist morality that you have to reject.

     Now, if you want to know what my philosophy, Objectivism, offers you -- I will give you a brief indication.  I will not attempt, in one lecture, to present my whole philosophy.  I will merely indicate to you what I mean by a rational morality of self-interest, what I mean by the opposite of altruism, what kind of morality is possible to man and why.  I will preface it by reminding you that most philosophers -- especially most of them today -- have always claimed that morality is outside the province of reason, that no rational morality can be defined, and that man has no practical need of morality.  Morality, they claim, is not a necessity of man's existence, but only some sort of mystical luxury or arbitrary social whim; in fact, they claim, nobody can prove why we should be moral at all; in reason, they claim, there's no reason to be moral.

     I cannot summarize for you the essence and the base of my morality any better than I did it in Atlas Shrugged.  So, rather than attempt to paraphrase it, I will read to you the passages from Atlas Shrugged which pertain to the nature, the base and the proof of my morality.

     "Man's mind is his basic tool of survival.  Life is given to him, survival is not.  His body is given to him, its sustenance is not.  His mind is given to him, its content is not.  To remain alive he must act, and before he can act he must know the nature and purpose of his action.  He cannot obtain his food without a knowledge of food and of the way to obtain it.  He cannot dig a ditch -- or build a cyclotron -- without a knowledge of his aim and of the means to achieve it.  To remain alive, he must think.

     "But to think is an act of choice.  The key to what you so recklessly call 'human nature,' the open secret you live with, yet dread to name, is the fact that man is a being of volitional consciousness.  Reason does not work automatically; thinking is not a mechanical process; the connections of logic are not made by instinct.  The function of your stomach, lungs or heart is automatic; the function of your mind is not.  In any hour and issue of your life, you are free to think or to evade that effort.  But you are not free to escape from your nature, from the fact that reason is your means of survival -- so that for you, who are a human being, the question 'to be or not to be' is the question 'to think or not to think.'

     "A being of volitional consciousness has no automatic course of behavior.  He needs a code of values to guide his actions.  'Value' is that which one acts to gain and keep, 'virtue' is the action by which one gains and keeps it.  'Value' presupposes an answer to the question: of value to whom and for what?  'Value' presupposes a standard, a purpose and the necessity of action in the face of an alternative.  Where there are no alternatives, no values are possible.

     "There is only one fundamental alternative in the universe: existence or non-existence -- and it pertains to a single class of entities: to living organisms.  The existence of inanimate matter is unconditional, the existence of life is not: it depends on a specific course of action.  Matter is indestructible, it changes its forms, but it cannot cease to exist.  It is only a living organism that faces a constant alternative: the issue of life or death.  Life is a process of self-sustaining and self-generated action.  If an organism fails in that action, it dies; its chemical elements remain, but its life goes out of existence.  It is only the concept of 'Life' that makes the concept of 'Value' possible.  It is only to a living entity that things can be good or evil.

     "A plant must feed itself in order to live; the sunlight, the water, the chemicals it needs are the values its nature has set it to pursue; its life is the standard of value directing its actions.  But a plant has no choice of action; there are alternatives in the conditions it encounters, but there is not alternative in its function: it acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction.

     "An animal is equipped for sustaining its life; its senses provide it with an automatic knowledge of what is good for it or evil.  It has no power to extend its knowledge or to evade it.  In conditions where its knowledge proves inadequate, it dies.  But so long as it lives, it acts on its knowledge, with automatic safety and no power of choice, it is unable to ignore its own good, unable to decide to choose the evil and act as its own destroyer.

     "Man has no automatic code of survival.  His particular distinction from all other living species is the necessity to act in the face of alternatives by means of volitional choice.  He has no automatic knowledge of what is good for him or evil, what values his life depends on, what course of action it requires.  Are you prattling about an instinct of self-preservation?  An instinct of self-preservation is precisely what man does not possess.  An 'instinct' is an unerring and automatic form of knowledge.  A desire is not an instinct.  A desire to live does not give you the knowledge required for living.  And even man's desire to live is not automatic: your secret evil today is that that is the desire you do not hold.    Your fear of death is not a love for life and will not give you the knowledge needed to keep it.  Man must obtain his knowledge and choose his actions by a process of thinking, which nature will not force him to perform.  Man has the power to act as his own destroyer -- and that is the way he has acted through most of his history [...]

     "Man has been called a rational being, but rationality is a matter of choice -- and the alternative his nature offers him is: rational being or suicidal animal.  Man has to be man -- by choice; he has to hold his life as a value -- by choice; he has to learn to sustain it -- by choice; he has to discover the values it requires and practice his virtues -- by choice.

       "A code of values accepted by choice is a code of morality.

     "Whoever you are, you who are hearing me now, I am speaking to whatever living remnant is left uncorrupted within you, to the remnant of the human, to your mind, and I say: There is a morality of reason, a morality proper to man, and Man's Life is its standard of value.

     "All that which is proper to the life of a rational being is the good; all that which destroys it is the evil.

     "Man's life, as required by his nature, is not the life of a mindless brute, of a looting thug or a mooching mystic, but the life of a thinking being -- not life by means of force or fraud, but life by means of achievement -- not survival at any price, since there's only one price that pays for man's survival: reason.

     "Man's life is the standard of morality, but your own life is its purpose.  If existence on earth is your goal, you must choose your actions and values by the standard of that which is proper to man -- for the purpose of preserving, fulfilling and enjoying the irreplaceable value which is your life."

     This, ladies and gentlemen, is what Objectivism offers you.

     And when you make your choice, I would like you to remember that the only alternative to it is communist slavery.  The "middle-of-the-road" is like an unstable, radioactive element that can last only so long -- and its time is running out.  There is no more chance for a middle-of-the-road.

     The issue will be decided, not in the middle, but between the two consistent extremes.  It's Objectivism or communism.  It's a rational morality based on man's right to exist -- or altruism, which means: slave labor camps under the rule of such masters as you might have seen on the screens of your TV last year.  If that is what you prefer, the choice is yours.

- - - - -

     I hope this may not be fully true here, but I have met too many young people in universities, who have no clear idea, not even in the most primitive terms, of what capitalism really is.  They [your elders] do not let you know what the theory of capitalism is, nor how it worked in practice, nor what was its actual history.

 - - - - -

     The real danger is that communism is an enemy whom they [our so-called intellectual leaders] do not dare to fight on moral grounds, and it can be fought only on moral grounds.

     This then, is the choice.  Think it over.  Consider the subject, check your premises, check past history and find out whether it is true that men can never be free.  It isn't true, because they have been.  Find out what made it possible.  See for yourself.  And then if you are convinced -- rationally convinced -- then let us save the world together.  We still have time.

     To quote Galt once more, such is the choice before you.  Let your mind and your love of existence decide.

 ______________
"The meaning ascribed in popular usage to the word 'selfishness' is not merely wrong: it represents a devastating intellectual 'package-deal,' which is responsible, more than any other single factor, for the arrested moral development of mankind." -- Ayn Rand
"Ethics is not a mystic fantasy -- nor a social convention -- nor a dispensible, subjective luxury, to be switched or discarded in any emergency.  Ethics  is an objective, metaphysical necessity of man's survival -- not by the grace of the supernatural nor of your neighbors nor of your whims, but by the grace of reality and the nature of life." -- Ayn Rand in The Virtue of Selfishness
"There was a time when Christians took faith as seriously as Mid-Eastern Muslims currently do: the Medieval Era." -- Wayne Dunn, here
"So long as [men] hold the tribal notion that the individual is sacrificial fodder for the collective, that some men have the right to rule others by force, and that some (any) alleged 'good' can justify it -- there can be no peace within a nation and no peace among nations." -- Ayn Rand in The Roots of War

Also see:
"9-11: The Ultimate Philosophy Lesson",
"Who is the final authority in ethics?" ,
The End of Faith: Chapter 1 (excerpt), 
The True Believer,
A Morality of Reason,
Definitions: Collectivism vs. Individualism,
"Enormous Mistakes of Epic Proportions", and 
"Religion was and remains a cover for justifying acts of terror and for arbitrary policies . . . ."

 

"The non-capitalist nations of the Communist and 3rd Worlds are brutal dictatorships, often wracked by bloody, internecine tribal warfare, in which the principles of individual rights and liberty are utterly unknown. Crucially, the rational mind is repudiated in these societies in favor of tribalism, faith and unremitting brute force. It should, therefore, come as no surprise that millions of individuals subsist in the most abysmal poverty in these countries – a destitution undreamed of in the capitalist world for almost 2 centuries." -- Andrew Bernstein
"The Nazis are well remembered for murdering well over 11 million people in the implementation of their slogan, 'The public good before the private good,' the Chinese Communists for murdering 62 million people in the implementation of theirs, 'Serve the people,' and the Soviet Communists for murdering more than 60 million people in the implementation of Karl Marx's slogan, 'from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.'  Anyone who defends any of these, or any variation of them, on the grounds of their 'good intentions' is an immoral (NOT 'amoral') enabler of the ACTUAL (not just the proverbial) road to hell." -- Rick Gaber

This short story excerpt provides a stunning picture of how altruism destroys peoples' lives.
and also see:
ALWAYS

at  http://FreedomKeys.com/paradox.htm#pcdt
_____

More article excerpts from Ayn Rand:
Racism
The Age of Envy
The Roots of War
Selfishness Without a Self
The Cult of Moral Grayness
Is there a "final authority" in ethics?
Faith and Force: The Destroyers of the Modern World
even more

 
Find an easier-to-copy version of this page HERE.
 
 
 

NOVEMBER-2014

 

H F 406

*
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MARCH 20-2017

H. F. 1152-FREEDOM WILL SOON BE YOURS!

 

*

 

 
DAILY MAIL

 

 

-RICHARD LITTLEJOHN FOR CHANCELLOR

-After a columnist said George Osborne becoming Evening Standard Editor is like Richard Littlejohn being madeCHANCELLOR.

 

My policy on VAT? Trebles all round!

 

... As Peter Preston, a former Guardian editor who now plies his trade pontificating about the media in the Observer remarked on Sunday: 'You might as well make Richard Littlejohn Chancellor of the Exchequer.'

Fair  point, guv. But it got me thinking that perhaps I was being a bit harsh on Osborne. In time, he may come to be mentioned in the same breath as the giants of my trade. The Standard has a special place in my heart, so I wish him well.

And if he can edit a newspaper, then why shouldn't I become Chancellor of the Exchequer?

Be honest, I couldn't do much worse that the current incumbent, the hapless

PHILIP HAMMOND

whose recent bugger's

MUDDLE

of a

BUDGET

created a

FULL BLOWN POLITICAL CRISIS.

Ok, so I don't have any specific experience to justify my being put in charge of the nation's finances.

But frankly, neither has Hammond. Nor Osborne, for that matter.

SPREADSHEET Phil was a PROPERTY DEVELOPER, who dabbled in flogging used cars when he was younger. George has never had a proper job outside politics...

[Doesn't this explain why the country is in DEBT to the tune of

£1,833,405,357,162

in March, 2017?

...

THE entire tax system should be simplified and nobody's annual return should take up more than a single side of A4paper

To help balance the books, I'd get rid of the

FOREIGN AID BUDGET

altogether, offering help only where it is needed most and in

EMERGENCIES.

As we're leaving the EU, I'd cancel all transfers to

BRUSSELS

IMMEDIATELY, on the grounds that WE'VE

GIVEN ENOUGH ALREADY.

I'd also

STOP SUBSIDIZING THE SCOTS,

so that folk north of the

BORDER

realise exactly what

INDEPENDENT WEE BURNEY GOVERNMENT

WOULD COST THEM.

BUSINESS RATES WOULD BE SCRAPPED TOO.

And I'd lower

DUTY ON STRONG DRINK

to help the

PUB TRADE.

ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES WOULD BE PUT OUT TO TENDER

with the only proviso being

THAT THE DUSTBINS MUST BE EMPTIED AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK

And if  you think what we've got now is

'AUSTERITY'

just wait until the

LITTLEJOHN AXE

REALLY STARTS SWINGING.

I'D ABOLISH MOST GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

starting with the

SCOTTISH OFFICE; INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; CULTURE, MEDIA and SPORT

whatever the

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE

calls itself this week

ANYTHING TO DO WITH

CLIMATE CHANGE

OR

'DIVERSITY'

and every

SINGLE QUANGO

from the

EQUALITIES COMMISSARIAT

to the

WELSH LANGUAGE COMMISSION.

THE TREASURY WOULDN'T ESCAPE THE CHOP, EITHER ,NOR WOULD

HMRC.

WITH SIMPLER TAXES - THERE BE NO NEED FOR SO MANY CIVIL SERVANTS

-THEY'D BE MADE REDUNDANT OVERNIGHT.

with a golden goodbye of

£20,000 each

so they can go and do something useful like

STARTING A SMALL BUSINESS

CREATING WEALTH

rather than

CONFISCATING IT.

As for my policy on

VAT?

Mines a large one, Dave, easy on the tonic. Grey Goose if you've got it, but Absolut's fine.

MR SPEAKER, I COMMEND THIS BUDGET TO THE HOUSE.

Trebles all round!

*

[WE FULLY SUPPORT YOUR BUDGET MR LITTLEJOHN

WE'VE WITH YOU ON THIS HOUSE CLEANING EXERSIZE  -  SO LETS GET CRACKING WITH THE POLICY AND POSTERS!

LET'S GET THE REVOLUTION ON IT'S WAY WITH A TRUE P£OPLE'S PARTY AND MAKE REAL CHANGE! -THE PRESENT POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC AND LEGAL SYSTEM HAS FINALLY TIED ITSELF IN KNOTS SINCE THE LAST ENGLISH CIVIL WAR-THE PEOPLE-THE COMMON PEOPLE - THE PLAIN PEOPLE -CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN UNDER

BREXIT!]

*

Full article

 

[Mr Littlejohn has our vote as Chancellor having read his robust article to reduce TAXATION in line with his proposals which would certainly be a vote catcher in our overtaxed and civil service ridden land.  AND what an IDEAL TIME! to show the WORLD what BREXIT is ALL ABOUT!   One wonders what has happened to the so-called LABOUR PARTY but then as with the  OTHERS in PARLIAMENT  and OUTSIDE  in the COUNTRY-it is the PERKS of the JOB-that MATTERS!  -Not getting value for money for the overburdened TAXPAYER.    Mrs May could DO IT! and make GREAT BRITAIN-PROSPEROUS AND GREAT AGAIN!]

DO IT!

'It might be in jest!

But it is for the best!

 So Mrs May why not take the test!

And relieve the hard-pressed taxpayer unduly pressed!'

That is our request!

And certainly you will be blest!

By all the rest!

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

MARCH 21-2017

 

H.F.1154 FREEDOM IS NEAR!

 

 

*

 

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

 

 

[A MOST GRAVE INJUSTICE HAS FINALLY BEEN RIGHTED!]

 

 

 

 

 

 

-VICTORY!

NOW SHOW ALL OUR TROOPS JUSTICE.

 

 

 

THIS was a great day for British justice, the armed forces morale, the free Press-and the decency of mail readers, whom we heartily thank for making it possible through their generosity.

 

 

When 'Marine A' Sergeant Alexander Blackman was convicted of murder for killing a mortally wounded Taliban insurgent in 2011, the defence ministry and top brass regarded his life sentence as a satisfactory end to an embarrassing episode. As far as they were concerned, his jailers could throw away the key.

 

This paper did not see it that way. Neither did legions of our readers from every walk of life, military and civilian, who contributed sums large and small to raise

£800,000 for Sgt Blackman's appeal.

 

Instead, we saw a soldier  with   an exemplary record, who had cracked under unimaginable stress on the battlefield and committed an atrocity quite out of character, before being hung out to dry.

 

Indeed the top brass behaved nothing short of contemptibly in seeking to cover up their incompetence and leadership failings-even suppressing a report on mitigating factors and stopping an officer from giving evidence for the defence.

 

WE never condoned Sgt Blackman's action. But like his brave, loyal wife Claire, we felt a terrible wrong had been done to him at his court martial. At the very least, his conviction should be reduced to manslaughter.

Yesterday, the Court Martial Appeal Court agreed.

 

JUSTICE AT LAST!

 

Yet the five judges' unanimous decision-and, we pray, Sgt Blackman's early release-cannot end the matter. For during three and a half years the former marine has been been behind bars, the legal hounding of troops has continued apace.

 

 

This is in spite of the fact that ambulance-chasing human rights lawyers have been exposed as crooks, with the firm behind trumped-up charges against hundreds of servicemen shutting down, and its bent founder Phil shiner struck off.

 

 

Meanwhile, the blow to morale has caused a sharp dip in Army recruitment and thousands of servicemen are retiring early.

 

[WHO CAN BLAME THEM WHEN THEIR OWN KIND TREAT THEM WITH SUCH GROSS ARROGANCE AND SUCH ABJECT DISTAIN AND DISRESPECT.]

 

 

As we celebrate justice for Sgt Blackman, therefore, ministers must urgently review the

MILITARY COVENANT

 to ensure heroes who risk all for us are treated fairly in return.

 

Yes, we still demand the highest standards of our soldiers. But in the name of sanity and justice, never again should a momentary lapse of judgment in the heat of battle be treated as calculated MURDER.

 

Full article

 

*  *  *

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CHANGES OF FORM AND TEXT ETC. ARE OURS!],

[AS OUR REGULAR VIEWERS ARE AWARE OVER THE PAST FEW DECADES WE HAVE SHOWN MANY BULLETINS OF OUR BRAVE TROOPS IN ACTION IN IRAQ-AFGHANISTAN AND IN OTHER THEATRES OF WAR AND OF SHORTAGES OF ESSENTIAL EQUIPMENT AND ARMS- MUCH OF THE INFORMATION HAS COME FROM DAILY MAIL SOURCES. THE INEFFICIENCY AND NEGLECT BY THE MOD HAS BEEN STATED ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS. WE HAVE ADVOCATED THAT ONLY BATTLE-FIELD PROVEN SOLDIERS OF MORE RECENT CONFLICTS SHOULD BE EMPLOYED- NOT DESK RECRUITS WHO HAVE OBTAINED THE POSITION BECAUSE OF RANK AND AS A RESULT THIS DISGRACEFUL TREATMENT OF A BRAVE SOLDIER WOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED.

IRAQ  WAR FILE

*

MARCH 16,2017

H.F.1148 FREEDOM  NOW

 

 

 

INDEX - MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

LATEST! IN PART 2-(March 7)

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST- CORRUPT - UNDEMOCRATIC -UNACCOUNTABLE-MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

SHORT CUT TO EXIT EU NEWS

eu latest news on brexit

latest news eu

eu latest immigration news

eu news now

eu news today

europe news headlines

eu germany latest

eu news germany

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

MARCH-2017

 
 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

      9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA
LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND
SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND
100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

 THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.
 
 

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 
  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
    •
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BritAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro

By James Slack Political Editor For The Daily Mail



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

Brexit will let us rediscover role as trading power | Daily Mail Online

Theresa May's Brexit speech puts Cameron to shame | Daily Mail ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Commons and Lords get ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Full reports and analysis

 

A great nation is reborn: Quitting will let us rediscover our role as a ...

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.
 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

  WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

  WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

  WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

  

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

 *		 7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

  WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

  WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW
 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

 

Leaving EU customs union could create 400,000 jobs in UK Pro ...

by James Slack

 

Tuesday, January 3,2017

BRITAIN will create almost 400,000 jobs if it

LEAVES THE EU's CUSTOM UNION,

pro-BREXIT

campaigners claimed last night.

Theresa May and senior ministers have hinted that some sectors of the BRITISH ECONOMY could look to STAY in the CUSTOMS UNION once the UK LEAVES...

 

 

[FOR THIS TO HAPPEN WOULD BE A BETRAYAL OF THE PRIME MINISTER'S FIRM UNEQUIVACAL STATEMENT THAT

 BREXIT

MEANS

BREXIT

 

 

Full article

 

JANUARY 3,2017

 

H.F.1118 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
DAILY MAIL

I fought heart and soul for

REMAIN.

by

 David Blunkett.

TUESDAY,FEBRUARY 21,2017

 

 

 

I fought heart and soul for Remain. But we Lords must NOT defy the PEOPLE'S WILL.

 

 

 

 

EXTRACT

Let us be clear. The debate which opened yesterday in the House of Lords is bigger simply that the issue of triggering Article 50 and beginning the arduous process of negotiating

BRITAIN'S WAY

 OUT OF THE

 EUROPEAN UNION

It is about understanding the mood of ordinary people towards political elites-not just in Britain but across

 EUROPE and AMERICA

*

Elites

The same trend is clear in America, where the election of Donald Trump as President was a resounding expression of dissatisfaction with the political status quo. Opinion polls in the run-up to elections across Europe this year show a similar pattern, with far-Right candidates leading in both Holland and France.

Last Friday, Tony Blair made a passionate and well-argued case for those who lost the referendum not to give up. He argued that Brexit was not 'inevitable', and called for pro-Europeans to 'rise up in defence of what we believe'.

His views were repeated in speeches yesterday in the House of Lords by some who felt that the referendum result was the wrong one.

But people have have had enough of

ELITES

telling them

WHAT TO DO...

 

*

 

Challenge
 

Given the expertise in the Lords, it is reasonable for the Upper House to consider or suggest amendments to the Bill before them.

It makes sense, foe example to reinforce the commitments in the Bill that have already been made in Parliament. Not least the right of Parliament to have a vote on the final

BREXIT PACKAGE

after it has negotiated with

EUROPEAN UNION.

 

It is not in any sense acceptable, however , to use the

DEBATE

to block

ARTICLE 50...

*

 

Ignored

I am sure common sense will prevail. Most members of the House of Lords recognise their delicate constitutional situation and even more delicate position

DEMOCRACY

faces in light of the alienation from the political process felt by so many.

As I said four weeks ago in the Lords, these wider considerations cannot and must not be ignored...

In other words, the issue of our place in Europe

HAS BEEN DECIDED

There is not going to be a second referendum...

But, if we believe

in

DEMOCRACY

It is the will of the People

and not

the predilections of those in positions of authority which must prevail.

*

 

 

Full article

 

 

WHICH

COMMON PURPOSE

http://stopcp.com

FOR MANY YEARS THE SPORES OF THIS DEADLY DESTABLISING DISEASE HAVE SPREAD OUT OF

DOWNING STREET

THROUGHOUT SOCIETY.

AND WHICH NO10 AND ITS ADHERENTS OF THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE -COLLECTIVIST -WASTEFUL AND FRAUDULENT EU

APPLAUDED.

WE NEED THE GREEK CONCEPTION  OF GUARDIANS OF THE REALM OF INDIVIDUALS WHO PUT COUNTRY-FIRST! -NOT PERSONAL INTEREST AND ADVANTAGE WHICH IS THE MORE USUAL PRACTICE AS MORE RECENT AND LONG-TERM HISTORY HAS SHOWN. UNDER SUCH A REGIME THE PUBLIC PURSE WOULD BE IN SAFE HANDS  WITH A MORE PRUDENT POLICY OF EXPENDITURE.

FEBRUARY 21-2017

 

 

TUESDAY,FEBRUARY 21,2017

H.F1119 FREEDOM AWAITS
 

 

 

 
 
 
 

DAILY MAIL

 COMMENT:

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 18,2017

 

Messianic Mr Blair is away with fairies

 

*

Messianic Mr Blair is

 

 

away with the fairies.

After a speech from a man who seems to have absolutely no self -knowledge, and which was dripping with messianic madness, the Mail had just one question to ask Tony Blair:

HAVE YOU TOTALLY AND UTTERLY

LOST THE PLOT.

Indeed, what other explanation is there for his frankly incendiary demand for Britons to 'rise up' after just eight months and reverse

THE GREATEST DEMOCRATIC EXERCISE IN THIS COUNTRY'S HISTORY.

What else but a descent into la-la-land explains our former prime minister's contemptible suggestion that voters had 'imperfect knowledge' about the true dangers of

BREXIT

when they choose

LEAVE?

Was he so busy hoovering up money from

DESPOTS

that he missed

PROJECT FEAR

Or does he simply believe voters are complete idiots?

Where was Mr Blair when, day by day, we were bombarded with doomsday predictions about

ECONOMIC COLLAPSE

SOARING INTEREST RATES...

SLUMPING HOUSE PRICES...

'an immediate shock' to the economy so dire it would require an

EMERGENCY BUDGET

All of it, we now know, was

FICTION

from

GEORGE OSBORNE

and his willing acolyte

MARK CARNEY

at the

BANK OF ENGLAND.

What else but delusion explains Mr Blair's demand that ministers now consider staying in a 'reformed' EU?

Has he forgotten how, after a whistle-stop tour to renegotiate our relationship-ended in

MISERABLE FAILURE?

Or that, in every crisis from

GREEK DEBT

to

REFUGEES,

the

EU-CORRUPT, UNACCOUNTABLE AND UNDEMOCRATIC

has proved itself impervious to

REFORM

*

Blair's speech reeked of contempt for ordinary voters. What he really means when he says Brexit 'isn't smart' is that anyone who voted that way-including intellectual giants such as the former Bank of England governor

MERVYN KING

-is utterly stupid.

He accuses LEAVE supporters of being 'ideologues', when he is an unrepentant

EUROFANATIC

who has never recanted his support for Britain joining the

EURO

But perhaps Mr Blair's greatest delusion is that he seems utterly unaware he is personally responsible for the disillusionment which drove great swathes of the public to vote

BREXIT.

With the help of his venal sidekick Alastair Campbell, he turned political lying into an art form and used it to take Britain  into a bloody and disastrous war that has cost

THOUSANDS OF LIVES.

Without a shred of democratic legitimacy, he threw open the doors to mass migration, placing huge strain on our

HOSPITALS

SCHOOLS

and

SOCIAL STRUCTURE.

This arch hypocrite twice promised a referendum on the EU and reneged both times.

Now he has the gall to demand the wishes of

17.4 MILLION VOTERS

BE REVERSED.

To the great credit of those on both sides of the debate, his arguments are falling entirely on deaf ears.  Polls show the vast majority of the public accepts the

REFERENDUM RESULT

and now wants ministers to get on with implementing it.

They also show just how spectacularly unpopular Mr Blair is, with fewer that one in five Remain voters viewing him in a positive light. And yet he persists with the notion that he could lead a new popular political movement against

BREXIT.

Thus messianic delusion morphs into megalomania.

The Mail confidently believes he won't succeed and that Britain has an exciting future outside the EU. As for Mr Blair, as much as this newspaper criticised him for it, perhaps he should go back to filling his boots by serving some of the world's nastiest autocrats.

Full article

 

*  *  *

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2017

*

 

TONY BLAIR-THE HEIGHT OF HYPOCRISY ENLARGED

Brought forward from EDP FILE -2005/6

THE DEATH OF POLITICS

A TIME TO MAKE A STAND IS HERE

BLAIR'S THREE WARS DOOMED TO FAILURE

HOW President Blair CORRUPTS EVERYTHING HE TOUCHES

TRAITOR BLAIR PUTS UP TWO FINGERS TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE

BLAIR- GOLDSMITH -SCARLETT AND OTHERS-A CABAL OF TREASON

WARNING OF OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON IN 1996-EURO DOOMED TO FAILURE

TONY BLAIR ONE OF THE MOST DISREPUTABLE- DUPLICITOUS AND DISHONEST PRIME MINISTERS IN BRITISH HISTORY

IMPEACH BLAIR FOR MISLEADING US OVER IRAQ WAR-SAYS GENERAL SIR MICHAEL ROSE [2006]

BUSH AND BLAIR START A WAR FOR POWER AND OIL AND TO RESTRICT THE FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE [2006]

ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY- CORRECT BLAIRDOM

[A VIEW OF A FEW BULLETINS OUT OF OVER 2,000 SINCE 2003 WITH THE GREATER MAJORITY FROM WRITERS OF THE DAILY MAIL.]

 *  *  *

 

H.F.1115 FREEDOM AWAITS.

 

 

 

 

Melvyn King-

 

 

 

 

 

FORMER Bank of England Governer:

 

 

 

 

 

 Leave voters

 

 

 

are not stupid racists

 

 

 

 

by

 

 

 

 Hugo Duncan and James Burton

 

 

he was accused of being 'stupid or racist' for even considering a vote to leave the
EU. ... have lost touch', adding: 'Why they were created in the first place no longer
seems relevant, and it's more difficult to see what each party stands for.'.
 

 

 

From grammar boy to grandee

Mervyn King served as the Governor of the Bank of England from 2003 to 2013. The 68-year-old attended Wolverhampton Grammar school before going on to study economics at Cambridge and Harvard. He became a professor at the London School of Economics in 1984.

In1990 he joined the Bank of England as a non-executive director and was appointed Governor in 2003.

He married his wife Barbara Melander, a Finnish interior-designer, in 2007 at a private ceremony in Helsinki.

In July 2013 he was made a life peer for contributions to public service.

 

Full article

 

 

DEMOCRACY AND REPRESENTATION

'... The people  must recognize that, even when they do not know what it is, there is a community of effort and satisfaction which binds them together, whether it is embodied in a language or in a common love of the land or even in a fiction or a mythology.   It must be something which if threatened will enable them to close ranks against a common enemy and to postpone domestic differences until the national menace has been defeated or removed.

i.e. LEAVE THE EU

This  idea of unity is that which makes a people, and without which a State is merely artificial and represents no permanent element in human history. It is this idea of unity which the statesman must interpret, leading the people to recognize themselves as

ONE PEOPLE

and to subordinate their differences to their

UNITY.

So only can they govern themselves. Otherwise there will be a section of governors and a section - or many sections-of subjects and no true State.. Historically, this position is illustrated by all the nationalisms of the nineteenth century. They represent a spirit of unity brought to self-consciousness by the intrusion of a foreign body.  They are not always rational. Sometimes they occur in what might almost be called the unemployables amongst nations, the nations who cannot preserve their self-respect without keeping others at a distance, who cannot work with others, and are in some instances unable to maintain their own unity except in active opposition to their neighbours. But sometimes they represent a genuine popular reaction and, as in the case of Italy [Again in 2017] substitute their claim to independent national Sovereignty.  But these are always questions of historical fact.  Their interest for us is principally that they illustrate the community of will and purpose which the representative must interpret, and which really constitute a

PEOPLE

*

Pages181 & 182 CH. vi

DEMOCRACY AND REPRESENTATION

THE PRINCIPLES OF POLITICS

By

A. R. LORD, M.A.

1926

*

'Public opinion is the proper protection of public liberties.'

EDMUND BURKE

Those who look to their own selfish needs instead of supporting the freedom from slavery of the common wealm deserve outlawry from the soon free Kingdom of England.

H.F.1111 FREEDOM AWAITS

 

 

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT:

Wednesday, February 15,2017

Keep trendy politics away

from

 pulpit ...

HOW DEEPLY depressing that the Archbishop of Canterbury has added his voice to the chorus of luvvies wailing against

BREXIT and Donald Trump

We have grown used to such posturing from millionaires at the Baftas and Oscars parading

LEFT-WING

consciences before sweeping off in limousines, clutching

£160.000 goodie bags.

But why does the chief clergyman of the

CHURCH OF ENGLAND

feel impelled to join them in the political arena, bandying about words such as

'POPULIST'

and even

'FASCIST'

to insult anyone who challenges the

LIBERAL ORTHODOXY.

For Justin Welby's information, millions voted

LEAVE

without a trace of racism or ill-feeling towards fellow men.  They included churchgoing Anglicans-and many who fought fascism in the war.

Yes, they wanted stronger border controls to ease the strain on public services and protect

NATIONAL SECURITY. BUT WHAT'S SO WRONG ABOUT THAT?

They were motivated, too, by a belief in Britain's ability to prosper in the world beyond the EU.

And every man and women among them believed in

VOTER'S DEMOCRATIC RIGHT

denied by

BRUSSELS

to elect and sack their rulers (an option unavailable under fascist regimes!)

Indeed, this paper sees nothing in the

BREXIT AGENDA

to warrant such crass and offensive condemnation from the pulpit.

As for Mr Trump, true, he is deeply flawed-though you might think a

CHURCHMAN

would at least approve of his crackdown on

MASS ABORTION

and support for

CHRISTIANS

in the

MIDDLE EAST.

But what business is it of the Archbishop to condemn the choice of

63,000,000

AMERICANS

or bracket them with supporters of

EUROPEAN NEO FASCISTS?

In an increasingly Godless Britain of emptying pews, family breakdown, selfishness, greed and shallow celebrity you might think Mr Welby had enough to concern him without dabbling in fashionable politics-thus further dividing a CHURCH already torn apart by its obsession with gay rights.

If he wanted to PREACH right-on LIBERALISM, he should have stood alongside NICK CLEGG for PARLIAMENT.

*

Full article

*

[It is often stated that the job maketh the man which could very well be true with Donald Trump but alas in the case of Mr Welby as they say you can't fit a square hole into a circle.]

[COMMENT IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

Wednesday, February 15,2017

 

H.F.1116 FREEDOM AWAITS
 
 

 

 DAILY MAIL

 

-To link those who voted Brexit to fascism is appalling (and historically illiterate ) ARCHBISHOP WELBY by Christopher Hart

FEBRUARY 15,2017

 

 

To link those who voted Brexit to fascism is appalling (and historically illiterate),ARCHBISHOP WELBY.

 

 
EXTRACT

The Archbishop of Canterbury has once again raised eyebrows with his political opinions. Addressing the General Synod- the Church of England's annual talking shop-he crassly linked

BREXIT

 with what he calls 'the fascist tradition'.

The most Reverend Justin Welby observed: 'There care a thousand ways to explain the Brexit vote or the election of President Trump or the strength in the polls in Holland of Geert Wilders or in France of Madame Le Pen (popular far right leaders in each country) and many other leaders in nationalist, populist or even fascist traditions of politics.'

Implying in this roundabout way that the ordinary decent people who voted for Brexit are somehow marked or tainted by traces of 'fascism' is an appalling ill considered move.

The Archbishop is reckoned an intelligent and well-meaning man, but here, he has revealed something alarming about the way in which he sees the world. Indeed, in their contempt for a

DEMOCRATIC RESULT

and their attempts to do everything to

THWART IT,

it's the

REMOANERS

who might be said to share the

'FASCIST TRADITION'

And, of course, I accept that Remainers are not closet fascist or Nazis-and neither are Brexit voters.

In the same speech in which he made this silly assertion, the Archbishop also lamented:

'The language of public life at present is deeply, savagely divided and may become worse.'

[Well! Archbishop - you have not shown Christian example by entering the debate at this same level?]

 

Divisive

  He's right about this. The language of public life has, particularly from the

REMAINERS

become more aggressive, less civil-although this is arguably because there are suddenly such huge issues at stake, after decades of rather sleepy consensus and drift.

But isn't casually describing

BREXIT VOTERS

as being in the same bracket as

'FASCISM'

in itself deeply savagely divisive, not to mention

TOTALLY UNTRUE?

Indeed, it is an historically absurd contention. Many of those who voted

BREXIT

were voting for

BRITISH SELF-DETERMINATION

and

DEMOCRACY,

thus upholding the principles so dear to those who fought

AGAINST FASCISM

in

WORLD WAR II

What is more, our parents' and grandparents' 'traditional' views to borrow Welby's language, left them instinctively suspicious of government by diktat from

UNELECTED APPARATCHIKS

such as the

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

in

BRUSSELS.

Now for the Archbishop, rejecting these unelected apparatchiks makes 

BREXIT SUPPORTERS

guilty of a complicity with a

'FASCIST TRADITION'

NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH

The writer George Orwell was a committed socialist who, unlike so many on theLEFT today, really did understand and love his fellow countrymen.

In 1941, at close to the darkest hour in the war, he wrote bluntly:

What has kept England on nits feet during the past year?

In part, no doubt, some vague idea about a

BETTER FUTURE

but chiefly the atavistic emotion of

PATRIOTISM

'For the last 20 years, the main object of the English Left-wing intellectuals has been to break this feeling

DOWN

and if they had succeeded, we might be watching the SS men patrolling the London streets at this moment.

Orwell, in other words, understood that

PATRIOTISM and NATIONAL PRIDE

-the very qualities that underpinned

BREXIT

were also the principle bulwarks against fascism during WORLD WAR II...

*

Oblivious

 

...In marked contrast to Archbishop Welby , his predecessor, Archbishop George Carey has spoken perceptively about how the current resurgence of

NATIONAL FEELING

IN THE

WEST

might be viewed.

Crucially, perhaps, Carey's own origins are more humble than Welby's.  He was born in the East End of London, went to a secondary modern in Barking and started work for the London Electricity Board.

Is this why he shows a better understanding of the British people and

THEIR BREXIT VOTE?

Welby, on the other  hand, was educated at Eton and Cambridge and has any number of grand family connections, including the

DUKES of RICHMOND.

As Mervyn King, the former governor of the Bank of England, observed last week, the distain the

ESTABLISHMENT

 showed for those worried about the

[UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-CORRUPT-GODLESS]

EU

encouraged many

TO VOTE TO LEAVE.

...

 

[TO BE CONTINUED]

 

*

Sneering

Instead of standing out as a leader willing to question the status quo, Welby's views chime perfectly with those of the Liberal establishment in

Academia, the BBC and Whitehall

Yet as

 Archbishop of Canterbury

rather than sneering and making offensive comparisons with fascists, should he not be making a more considered attempt to understand what motivates

BREXIT VOTERS?

The intense levels of disillusionment with the

POLITICAL CLASS

the longing for a sense of

IDENTITY

in a world that is changing too rapidly for

SOCIAL COHESION

the mass movement of peoples to our country that doesn't seem so exciting and diverse (as some bill it) as

DESTABILISING AND DIVERSE.

To suggest that these views are of a 'fascist tradition' is to grasp for the hysterical  terminology of the keyboard zealots of Facebook and Twitter, their shallow language of labelling and insult.

It is frankly, profoundly unworthy of the leader of the

CHURCH OF ENGLAND.

*  *  *

 

Full article

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1097 FREEDOM NOW

 

 

Understanding Easter- a part of our Christian cultural force which has made us what we are.

*

Christianity is more than a Religion it is the main cultural force, which makes us what we are.

 *

The Individual is the backbone of Christianity

*

Christianity, The People, and Ethics.

The Importance of the Christian Faith, which is written into the Constitutions of a number of European Nations.

*

A Defence of Christianity by a once militant agnostic who became a champion of the Parish Churches of England.

 

*

Who CARES about MORALITY?

*

Our Christian Festival of Easter which many know so little and some none.

 *

 

 ALFRED CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH

 

MARCH 21 -2008

 

*          *          *

 

AND

FOR FURTHER STUDIES

 

 

 

 

 

Daily MaiL on SUNDAY

 

Why don't we teach migrants we are a

CHRISTIAN COUNTRY.

by LORD CAREY

 FORMER ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY.. -

 

...I believe we should include Christianity in citizen tests for all those who want to come to this country. There are many questions aked of migrants about the Royal Family and Parliament, but little about the Church of England or Britain's Christian history.

And it is vital that the Government itself does its homework better. Politicians and advisers would do well to remember the contribution of Christianity to our life, and not just our 'holy-days' and celebrations.

In coordination with religious leaders, some thought should be given to special training in religious literacy for at least some judges, Ministers and senior servants who deal directly with religious communities-their freedom and equalities.

It is preposterous yet dangerous state of affairs when Christmas cards are considered offensive, or the Cross is banned because it is thought divisive. Yet this is the world we live in.

We should rejoice in our Christian identity as a nation and celebrate it. Ordinary British people are not drifting away from the Christian Faith- look at the packed church carol services up and down the country.

'Peace on earth and goodwill towards men'

 may be the song of angels, but it should also be the aim of all of us to build a nation where we are secure in our own faith and welcome others.

 

Full article

 

 

 

 

H.F.1073BREXIT NOW

 

 
 

Why I as a Christian believe we Must-

banish evil British jihadis from these shores-

Says former-Archbishop-Canterbury.

1. Lord Carey wants those involved in terrorism to lose their passports

[2.WE have not included item 2 as it is strongly contradicted (*) below]

 3.Muslim communities are being pressured to discipline their young

by Lord Carey forMAIL ON SUNDAY

EXTRACT

(*)...By embracing multiculturalism and the idea that every culture and belief is of equal value

WE HAVE BETRAYED OUR OWN TRADITIONS

of welcoming strangers to

OUR SHORE..

The strangers we welcome were attracted to

OUR WAY OF LIFE

and

DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS.

They were escaping

TOTALITARIANISM

and

RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION

and  wanted to come to a country where there was

FREEDOM OF RELIGION

and separation of the power of

CHURCH

STATE

and

JUDICIARY

They also came to one of the only countries in Europe where there was an

ESTABLISHED CHURCH.

The establishment of the Church didn't mean other

BELIEFS

were not welcome but it did offer hospitality for a range of diverse beliefs...

This year we are reminded by the commemoration of

TWO WORLD WARS

that the

VALUES

of our

DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS

are

PRECIOUS

Our fathers and grandfathers-including many thousands of Muslims from around the

Commonwealth

Fought against

TOTALITARISM

for the survival of DEMOCRATIC VIRTUES.

The bloody advance of IS is a reminder that

TOTALITARISM

 Is far from

DEAD

OUR FIGHT CONTINUES.

 

More!

 

 

Multiculuralism is no longer right for Britain by CRE Head Trevor Phillips [IT NEVER WAS.]

Christianity is more than a Religion it is the main cultural force which makes us what we are.

immigration flood'fuelling more hostility

Muliticulturalism: not only a fraud-but also DANGEROUS!

OUR PAST is embedded in our NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS-It asks-WERE WE CAME FROM and WHO WE ARE.

.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 24 -2014

H F 228

 
 
 

 

 

    Daily Mail

     

    Spare a thought for our poor

     

     

     

     judges!

     

     

     

     

    They

     

     

    moan they're ...

     

     

     

     

    By

     

     

    Steve Doughty

    They moan they're underpaid and unappreciated (despite enjoying

    six-figure salaries)

    THE majority of judges think they are unappreciated and underpaid, an official report

     said yesterday...

     

    The survey was carried out in June and July last year, four months before the

    decision of Lord Thomas and High Court colleagues to disrupt the BREXIT process

    by ordering that  Parliament must vote on Article 50-an intervention that provoked

    widespread controversy.

    The survey followed growing political acrimony over

    apparent willingness of the

    [mainly EU minded and controlled judges]

     

    courts routinely to overturn ministerial

    decisions, especially in cases involving

    IMMIGRATION

    ASYLUM

    the detention of terror suspects and the deportation of

    criminals.

    [Well! ,we have the Human Rights Act of 1998 courtesy

    of

    war-monger Tony Blair to blame for this stupid and

     dangerous situation.]

    ...Dr David Green, a criminologist who is director of the Civitas think-tank, compared

     the judges to the Aslef train drivers union. 'there is a blend of victim-hood and

    aggression on display,' he said

    'They may feel underpaid by comparison with what lawyers exploiting no-win no fee

     and conditional fee arrangements can get. They should be comparing themselves

     with a typical salary for someone in a responsible job.

    'We have seen in the

    SUPREME COURT

    ruling on

    BREXIT

    that

     

    MOST OF THE JUSTICES

     

    were acting as

     

    POLITICAL USURPERS

     

     

    For judges now to act in a way to increase their pay is not

     

    compatible with being seen as acting in the

     

     

    SPIRIT OF JUSTICE

     

     

    IF THEY THINK THIS IS GOING TO IMPROVE

     

    THE WAY THEY ARE REGARDED BY THE

     

    PUBLIC

     

    THEY ARE MAKING A

     

     

    [ BIG ]

     

     

    MISTAKE.

     

    Full article

     

    *

    Is the EU undemocratic? | World news | The Guardian

    *

    The Undemocratic EU Explained - It Will Never Change | The ...

    *

    Alfred Denning, Baron Denning - Wikiquote

    *

    [PDF] 

    The United Kingdom and Human Rights - College of

     

    Social ...

      PROFESSOR Lord McGregor of Durris. 1980 Constitutional ..... delivered at
    London University by Lord Denning and in a sense set the ... it—human

    rights
    discourse arose in a Western European context. .... godless gatherings of
    philosophers for the next two hundred ...... that the judiciary is

    undemocratic,
    unaccountable and.

    *

    [PDF] 

    Untitled - UCL

    (and the European Court of Human Rights) give effect to civil
    and political ...... that it is undemocratic for these unelected and

    unrepresentative
    individuals to ... determined by a democratically unaccountable panel of

    foreign

    judges, ..... Lord Denning once drew a distinction between two judicial

    extremes:.
         *

    july 23 freedom now-part 2-2016 - English Democratic

     

     Party

    Tory MPs yesterday hit out at plans for Britain to keep access to the EU ...

    OF THE
    CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS ...... OF
    THE COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-UNACCOUNTABLE MAMMOTH BEAST IN ......
    and whose legislation, according to the late Lord Denning, a former Master

    of the...
     

    *

     

    *july 23-freedom now-2016 - English Democratic Party

    And the first British President of the European Commission in Brussels

    (Lord ......
    if they were in charge instead of the EU's unaccountable individuals who

    number
    in ..... and whose legislation, according to the late Lord Denning, a former

    Master
    ..... the Captive-Collectivist-Corrupt -Wasteful- Godless Undemocratic

    European
     

    *

    Major Issues Bulletin 30 - EDP English Democratic Party.

    1 Jan 2016 ... Albania is in course to join the European Union-alongside four

    other countries .....
    were in charge instead of the EU's unaccountable individuals who number

    in the
    .... as a COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT -GODLESS-UNDEMOCRATIC ..... law'',

    and
    whose legislation, according to the late Lord Denning, a former ...
     

    Searches related to LORD DENNING AND THE UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-GODLESS EU

    eu undemocratic examples

    eu unelected bureaucrats

    the eu is not democratic

    does the eu suffer from a democratic deficit

    undemocratic nature of the eu

    is the eu democratic essay

    european commission unelected

    eu undemocratic myth

    *

    [WE thank the unseen hands which have assisted the CAUSE for a

     

     FREE

     

    ENGLAND,

     

    since we commenced our bulletin file in 2003.]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    FEBRUARY 10-2017
 

H.F.1112 FREEDOM AWAITS!

 

 
 

 

TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
  
 By

PATRIOT and TRUTH SEEKER
   
 NORRIS McWHIRTER
 

2003

 

[This was our No 15 bulletin in 2003-It clearly stated the case to be answered but it was ignored by the Courts.]

...Of all the magical and mysterious processes involved in Britain’s political integration with Europe, initiated by Macmillan and engineered by

HEATH

 from 31 July 1961 to17 October 1972, none is more remarkable than the absence of a single measure repealing any part of any of the four great Constitutional Statutes –

 MAGNA CARTA

of Edward 1, the Petition of Right (1627), the Bill of Rights (1688 ) and the Act of Settlement (1700). Perhaps Sir John Fiennes relied upon the doctrine of implied repeal, but certainly the electorate would have regarded express repeal as offending against the principle that nothing but their own demerit can deprive natural born subjects of their peculiar privileges, called their birthright, as enshrined in these hitherto durable constitutional bulwarks. 

  

 In Vauxhall Estates v. Liverpool Corporation 1932, it was established in law that “no Parliament may bind its successors” However, Article Q  of the timeless Maastricht Treaty said that the Treaty “is concluded for an unlimited period” and it conveyed no right or mechanism for secession. It is nonetheless arguable that what one Parliament has done , that same or some succeeding Parliament can undo. In Blackburn v.Attorney General 1983, Lord Justice Megarry, in his judgement declared:

   

“As a matter of  law, the Courts of England recognize Parliament as being omnipotent in all save the power to destroy its omnipotence.”  

   

From the European Court of Luxembourg in 1972, the very year in which Parliament, at least temporarily, voted away its sovereignty in such large measure, came an unappealable judgement on the Treaty of Rome:

   

“The treaty entails a definitive limitation of the sovereign rights of member states against which no provisions of municipal law whatever their nature can be involved.”

    It was in reference to this Court that Sir Patrick Neill QC, former Warden of All Souls College, Oxford, coined the maxim;

 

“ A court with a mission is a menace; a supreme Court with a mission is a tyranny.”

 [THOSE JUDGES WHO PERMITTED THE EU TREATIES TO PASS THOUGH KNOWING THAT LIES AND DECEIT WERE USED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WHICH MADE THE TREATIES

NULL AND VOID

UNDER THE 1996 VIENNA CONVENTION ON  THE LAW OF TREATIES  SHOULD BE TRIED FOR TREASON. FORTUNATELY FOR THEM WE HAD A REFERENDUM INSTEAD OF A CIVIL WAR  AS IN CROMWELL'S DAY  WOULD KNOW HOW TO DEAL WITH TRAITORS. IN THAT CONFLICT THE COUNTRY WAS DIVIDED AS IN JUNE 23-2016.]

The phrase was incorporated into the recent Euro-sceptic speech by the Home Secretary. (1996)

   Those who see th erosion of British self –government (in defence of the 1,250,000 Britons died in the first half of this century) as emanating from the single Oxford college of Balliol, will be dubbed ‘ conspiracy theorists’. But the precise legal definition of a conspiracy is that it is an agreement between

 

 

 unrelated in marriage, to behave in a manner that will automatically constitute an offence by at least one of them, though mens rea (guilty mind) is required by at least two co-conspirators. There is nothing theoretical about the way in which the Privy Counsellor’s oath, which enjoined two Balliol educated Prime Ministers,

Macmillan and Heath.

And the first British President of the European Commission in Brussels (Lord Jenkins of Hillhead, also a  Balliol man!):

    “To bear and allegiance to the Crown and to defend its jurisdiction and powers against all foreign .   .   . persons .   .   . or states.”

  

 has been breached by these men.

 

  What is further demoralizing is that no less than six subsequent Privy Counsellor’s, following the precedent of Lord Jenkins in 1975, have each made a solemn declaration before the Luxembourg Court as European Commissioners:

   

“To perform my duties in complete independence in the general interest of the communities; in carrying out my duties”.

  

This conflict of solemn undertaking can only mildly be described as duplicitous.

    Unconstitutionality in the headlong dash to create the new European Superstate is hardly confined to Britain. The Dutch draftsmen of the Maastricht Treaty included a stipulation in Article R that each and every country must ratify it “according

to its own constitution requirements”.  Having got it ` wrong’ the first time, Denmark`s second referendum raised several studiously unanswered constitutional questions . No case was , however, more stark than the case of Germany herself. She has a unique Federal Constitutional Court, the Bundesverfassungsgericht, with nine judges sitting in Karksruhe to guard their Constitution.

   

The creation of the European Union and Britain`s continued self-governance was dependent on the verdict of this Court for , on 11 October 1993 , Germany`s instrument of ratification was still undeposited in Rome. Without this twelfth and last document (the other 11 EU countries having ratified the Maastricht Treaty) the EU could not come into being. It transpired however that the terms approved by this supreme German national Court to permit ratification, were miles wide of the terms of the Treaty already signed by the German Government and the eleven other nations.

    For instance, the Court declared:

   

“Article F does not empower the (European) Union to procure the financial means or other means it deems necessary to fulfil its purposes.”

   

Yet that is precisely what Article F does say in the following words:

  

 “ The Union shall provide itself with the resources necessary to attain its objectives and carry out its policies.”

    Following a question in the House of Lords, Baroness Chalker, Minister of State in the Foreign Office, confirmed that indeed the European Union “can obtain financial resources to attain the Union`s  objectives.”        

 

  In another area the Karksruhe Court calmly took for Germany an unnegotiated opt-out from the European Monetary Union (EMU) -  something for which both Denmark and the United Kingdom had to negotiate by special protocol prior to signing. Both the Governors of the Bank of England and the Danish Central Bank have confirmed that there was and is no opt-out provision for Germany in the Treaty. The fact that the terms and conditions of the Maastricht Treaty, as approved by their Constitutional Court, simply do not exist. Hence Germany`s rapid ratification was in clear breach of Article R of the Treaty itself. Since its ratification was invalid, the Maastricht Treaty itself has no proper legal standing.

   

Though earlier this year (1996) our Foreign Office made a legal assessment of the Treaty, it has not publicly disclosed the obvious and only conclusion. Perhaps we are waiting either until the going gets rougher or some wealthy corporation litigates to prove that some swingeing Brussels penalty is in fact unenforceable.

  

 No sovereign state can survive without the concepts of allegiance and of breaches of allegiance being treasonable.

   

Can a European Superstate survive without such internal defences? The answer must assuredly be that where solidarity is more, rather than less, fragile and tenuous, the as yet unfamiliar concept of Euro-treason will eventually be vigorously advanced. There does not appear to be any ready instrument for enforcement at the moment (1996) it is not however hard to predict that the draconian powers of the Luxembourg Court will soon bring the concept of Euro-treason into focus. We are told that the Europol is intended for apprehending cross-border criminals within the Union. But the beef crisis, the United Kingdom was about to acquiesce in its creation. Perhaps a fortuitous blow for freedom has been struck and magazine articles such as this will be safe from a Europol for a little longer.

    Bully for beef.

 FULL ARTICLE

 

 

UNDER

MAGNA CARTA

 IT IS LAWFUL FOR ENGLISHMEN TO TAKE UP ARMS TO FIGHT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THEIR INHERITED

Rights and Liberties

of

Englishmen

*          *          *

 

[IT APPEARS WE NO LESS NEED NEW CITIZENS TO SIGN A DECLARATION OF INTENT TO INTEGRATE  - WE IT SEEMS ALSO NEED EVERYONE WHO VOTED TO STAY IN THE UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE- CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS EU TO PROTECT IN FUTURE THEIR AND THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS PRICELESS ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.

ENGLISH FREEDOM CANNOT  EVER AGAIN BE DISCARDED AS IT IS INCUMBENT ON ENGLISHMEN TO RETAIN THEIR INHERITED RIGHTS AS NOT TO DO SO PLACES THE SECURITY OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHER PATRIOTIC ENGLISHMEN AT RISK, AS HAPPENED IN 1972 AND ALMOST AGAIN IN 2016. THERE IS ALSO THE MATTER OF PASSING ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS THAT WHICH WE HOLD DEAR TO OUR HEARTS.

FORTUNATELY,IT WAS THE

 SHIRES OF ENGLAND

 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CENTRAL BLOT ON THE LANDSCAPE

 WARWICK

WHICH DEFIED ITS HISTORICAL PLACE IN HISTORY AND BY A MAJORITY WISHED TO REMAIN IN THE UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-CORRUPT-GODLESS EU. THERE WAS ALSO LONDON WITH ITS MANY MILLIONS OF NEWCOMERS FROM AROUND THE WORLD WHO IN THE MAIN HAVE NO RESPECT OR LOYALTY TO ENGLISH TRADITIONS.

WE ALSO HAVE MILLIONS OF THOSE OF ANOTHER CULTURE OF WHICH IT IS ESTIMATED ALMOST

2,000,000

WILL NEVER INTEGRATE

AS WE HAVE SAID SO MANY TIMES , WE ARE AT A LOSS TO UNDERSTAND HOW ANY CITIZEN OF OUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND COULD GIVE AWAY THOSE IMMEMORIAL RIGHTS WHICH BELONG TO EVERYONE IN OUR ISLAND HOME WHICH ARE SO RESPECTED AND PROTECTED IN MORE THAN HALF THE WORLD.]

'Slavery they can have anywhere. It is a weed that grows in every soil.'

EDMUND BURKE

(As we already know over the past 44 years)

 

...We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

 

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2

 

A REMINDER FROM 2003

 

BRITAIN AND EUROPE

 

We are still finding 8 months after BREXIT that those who voted to remain in the EU are still complaining about the affect it will have on them rather than accept the result  of the REFERENDUM and the majority decision to reclaim their over 800 year inherited English Constitution and all that it since entails for

 THEIR FREEDOM-THEIR LAW and THEIR CUSTOM

 for  which millions of subjects have given their lives since - particularly in the TWO WORLD WARS.  The EU did not keep the PEACE in captive EUROPE-it was NATO. In fact is was

GERMANY

 itself which created tension in Croatia and elsewhere. And as we have all seen since

BREXIT

 the patriotic people across the soon reclaimed English Channel are in REVOLT against the monstrous Orwellian EU elite and their close friends the  GLOBALISTS and we now see a rapidly

GATHERING STORM

of protest and demand to reclaim their own once

 FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

accountable to the

PEOPLE.

 AS we have previously stated when a country is at war to defend its

 COUNTRY-CONSTITUTION-CUSTOM

the PEOPLE suffer HARDSHIP as many still with us today experienced in the SECOND WORLD WAR and one would have expected that those

 REMAINERS

 would have understood and accepted the situation instead of continuing complaining of their PERSONAL LOSS of WHATEVER KIND.

As has been stated over the years

 

'The World is our Oyster.'

This England never did, nor never shall,/Lie at the proud foot of a conqueror,/ But when it first did help to wound itself:/ Now these her princes are come home again,/ Come the three corners of the world in arms,/ And we shall shock them, Nought shall make us rue/ If ENGLAND to itself do rest but true. [vv.vii.112]

Shakespeare

 

.F. 1113 FREEDOM AWAITS!

 

 

Daily Mail

 

 

- OUT OF ORDER, MR SPEAKER! -

 by

Daniel Martin-Chief Political Correspondent

 

 

 

 

 

 

OUT OF ORDER-MR SPEAKER!

 

 

 

 

QUENTIN LETTS -YESTERDAY IN PARLIAMENT

 
 

Ka-bound Bercow boils over with self important outburst

 

DAILY MAIL-QUENTIN LETTS-YESTERDAY IN PARLIAMENT-Ka-boom! Bercow boils over with self important outburst when he attacked Donald Trump-strongley opposed to Trump's address to Parliament.

 

JOHN Bercow, who has been in a particular mood since early January, exploded messily all over the Commons yesterday when he attacked Donald Trump.

As so often with Bercow, the red mist came down and he let loose a volley of self-important rudeness about how he wouldn't dream of inviting that Trump man to Westminster because (in so many words) heawas a racist, sexist and didn't believe in equality and an independent judiciary. That last bit was aimed at the Tory benches with a glower.

The outburst so delighted the Opposition benches that the Scots Nats starting clapping. Conservative Members looked daggers. Mr Bercow, who had plainly enjoyed his sally greatly quickly swept out of the Chamber, librarian-style robes swirling in his wake. Nurse! A cold compress for his boiling brow!

Some context. Moments earlier the Speaker had been challenged by a couple of Tory buffers about an edict at the start of the day when he announced that Commons clerks would no longer have to wear wigs and court dress. This being done to make the house less stuffy and forbidding'.

Given this assault on fripperies, we must hope the Speaker will immediately surrender his ornate grace-and-favour house on the parliamentary estate, as that is also plainly a ridiculous throwback to a twirlier age.

Will the Speaker' pretty-calved young page-his trainbearer, I believe-also be removed from his old-fashioned knickerbockers and ruff collar? Will the mace be flogged off on eBay? Will Members be told they no longer need to bow to the chair?

Let moderation sweep through the place like a dose of gyppy, says I...

...

Full article

[... Unlike the Speaker of the Lords the Speaker of the Lower House ( House of Commons), who holds rank as the first commoner of the realm, can take no part in debates, and has no vote unless the numbers are equal, when he has a casting vote. The office, which is filled by a vote of the Commons subject to royal approbation, is of very ancient origin. That some spokesman was necessary from the first institution of Parliament is sufficiently obvious, but the position and title; of Speaker were only settled in 1377. But Henry of Keighley, who in 1301 bore the petition of the Lincoln Parliament to the royal presence; Sir William Trussell, who answered for the Commons in 1343, though not a member of the House itself; Sir Peter de la Mare, famous leader of the Good Parliament in 1376, who discharged the functions without the title, must all practically have been in much the same position as the later speaker,  But in 1376 the title is definitely given to Sir Thomas Hungerford, and from that date the list is complete.

SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

Sir Thomas Hungerford-1376

Sir Peter de la Mare-1377

Sir James Pekeryug - 1378

Sir John Gildersburgh -1380

Sir Richard de Waldsgrave - 1381

Sir John Pickering -1383

Sir John Bussy -1384

Sir John Cheyne -1399...

[The Speaker of the House of Commons at any one time is no doubt a window into the composition of that House and its true persona in the country. With much more care in its selection of such an important individual  needs a reserve in line with the reverence and great importance of the revered historic institution as the position must enhance the image and efficiency of that unique and long established democratic parliamentary body, without the office itself being a competitor of that COMMONS of ENGLAND ,so respected in the world at large, since its beginning on November 27, 1295 (apart from its earlier origin). ]

DICTIONARY OF ENGLISH HISTORY

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full article

 

H.F.1096 FREEDOM-AWAITS

 
 
 

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

 

-PIPSQUEAK BERCOW IS AN EMBARRASSMENT

THIS time he has gone too far. Out of respect for his office, this column has long observed restraint in its criticism of the Commons Speaker. But by insulting the newly elected

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

John Bercow has made it impossible to

MAINTAIN OUR SILENCE.

Indeed, this egotistical publicity -seeker has broken the most sacred rule of his job-that he should be scrupulously

NEUTRAL AND AT ALL TIMES SERVE THE HOUSE.

In banning Donald Trump from addressing

PARLIAMENT

without any authority from MPs or consultation with the LORDS, the exhibitionist Mr Bercow has set himself up as the

MASTER OF THE COMMONS

NOT ITS

SERVANT.

Eaten up by self-regard - and a lust for headlines, shared with his wife Sally- he has single-handedly created an ugly diplomatic incident, which threatens to undermine the work of the

 Prime Minister- Theresa May

in promoting

BRITAIN'S INTERESTS

and bringing the maverick President into line.

Leave aside Mr Bercow's hypocrisy in welcoming visitors from

TOTALITARIAN

North Korea and China while snubbing the elected representative of our

FREEDOM-LOVING ALLY

THE USA

Forget his lavish expenses claims and persistent bias against the Conservatives, whose far-Right he supported before his

CONVERSION TO POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

It is time for the Speaker to accept that his love of the sound of his own voice is not shared by the House he purports to represent-or a public to whom he is frankly an

 EMBARRASSMENT.

By jeopardising the

SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP

in this way, this arrogant, self-promoting pipsqueak of a man has done a massive disservice to

HIS OFFICE AND HIS COUNTRY.

 

Full article

FEBRUARY 8-2017

 
 

A MAN CALLED PETER-THE STORY Of PETER MARSHALL

*

A SCOTSMAN WHO FILLED THE  CHAPLAINCY OF THE SENATE OF  THE USA.

 

We intend to show excepts from the book 'Compellingly told by much loved author Catherine Marshal -this is the story of her first husband Peter Marshall. It is an irresistible account of the love between a dynamic man and his GOD and the tender love between a husband and wife.

The life of Peter Marshall -'the story that had to be told'-recounts the triumph of a young Scottish immigrant who made his way from his homeland to the chaplaincy of the United States Senate.

Catherine's and Peter's life together in the hall's of highest human happiness', as Peter often referred to marriage, is related with love humour and immense wisdom.

'The best stories are those that really happen. None of the novels...written during the last few years touches the heart and appeals to the mind in the way that Catherine Marshall does in telling the story of her husbands life.'

Catherine Marshall was the author of numerous bestselling books, including Christy, Julie. The Helper, Beyond Our Selves and A Closer Walk.

The book A Man Called PETER has sold 2,000,000 copies

Hodder and Stoughton Ltd

338 Euston Road

London NWI 3 BH

1951

*

 

 

We commence our brief search of the life of a 

 A MAN CALLED PETER

with the Preface of the Book

Since Peter Marshall left us to be at home in our Father's house, I have often dreamed of him. But one dream was different from all the rest. It had the feel of reality about it

I dreamed that I was allowed to visit Peter briefly, to see him in his new setting. I found him working in a rose garden, surrounded by those perfect hybrid tea roses he always wanted to grow

.After a while, he said playfully, "I know perfectly well what you've been doing, Catherine. You're writing a book. Now, now  -no exposes! What you're doing to me shouldn't happen to a dog!"

Then in a more serious vein, "It's all right, Kate. Go ahead and write it. Tell it all, if it will prove to people that a man can love the Lord and not be a sissy..."

So, in the months since then I have written it. reliving and recording parts of the life that Peter and I shared has a joyous task. The presence of Christ has shed glory on even the hard-to-bear parts of it.

I hope that you will enjoy it, and that by the time you have come to the last page [332p], you will know that if God can do so much for a man called Peter, he can do as much for YOU .

C.M

Washington, D.C.

April 29, 1951.

 

[As we have stated we shall be revealing extracts of the publication and have decided to generally restrict our recording to just three of the 20 chapters in the book which is of 332 pages.]

Before we commence our journey of the life of a Man called Peter we wish to explain that it was a recent screening of the Fact-based drama

A MAN CALLED PETER

on FILM4

which prompted  this mission into the life of a Man of God.  The distinguished actor portraying Peter Marshal is Richard Todd of The Dambusters and The Longest Day and many other fine patriotic films since the Second World War. He was himself fighting at Pegasus Bridge a vital objective on D Day June 6-1944.

 

*

 

Chapter One

 

ABOVE TIME AND CIRCUMSTANCE

 

 

For ye shall go out with joy...and it shall be to the Lord for a name, for an everlasting sign that shall not be cut off. Isaiah 55:12-13

The morning was bleak and cold. A damp penetrating wind ruffled the steel-grey waters of the Potomac, chased bits of paper and debris down the broad roped- off expanse of Pennsylvania Avenue, and whistled around the dome of the Capital.

Everywhere Washington wore an air of expectancy. The hillocks of lumber, which had been piled for weeks along the Avenue, had finally been fashioned into grandstand and bleachers.  Every street corner was garnished with a navy blue of District policemen. The gray lampposts were decorated with small American flags and pictures of Truman and Barkley. Red, white, and blue bunting was everywhere.  In a few hours, forty thousand marchers and more than forty floats would form a column seven miles long in honour of the

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

It was Inauguration Day , January 20, 1949.

Before the stately Capital building with it's wide-spreading wings, I sat with 120,000 other people on crudely  built benches watching the dignitaries taking their places on the special platform before us.

Radio, television, and motion -picture technicians scurried up and down their newly built platforms, adjusting and testing equipment. At twelve noon, the eyes and ears of most Americans would be centered on this scene.

I knew that in the old Senate Chamber, with it's plum-coloured leather seats and green-carpeted aisles, Peter Marshall, the Senate Chaplain, called by many a reporter the

"Conscience of the Senate"

was at that moment praying. His simple, sincere, down- to - earth prayers had been having an increasing profound effect on the Senators. But it was an intimate thing - not the kind of thing a man talks about readily.

 

I could picture the scene, as I had often seen it -the sudden hush, the way the men reverently dropped their heads as Peter prayed:

'God of our fathers in Whom we trust and by Whose guidance and grace this nation was born, bless the Senators of these United States at this important time in our history and give all things needful to the faithful discharge of their responsibilities.

We pray especially today for our President, and also for him who will preside over this chamber.

Give to them good health for the physical strains of their office, good judgment for the decisions they must make, wisdom beyond their own, and clear understanding for the problems of this difficult hour.

We thank Thee for their humble reliance upon Thee. May they go often to the throne of grace as we commend them both to Thy loving care and Thy guiding hand.

 Through Jesus Christ our Lord. AMEN.

Soon I spied Peter marching, hat in hand, with the Senators, into the seats provided for them to the left of the Inaugural stand.  he was between Senator Lucas and Senator Vandenberg. The expression on his face suggested he was particularly pleased about something.

From where I was sitting, I could see Peter and the Senators well enough to guess that much quiet camaraderie was going on in that section of the stand.

Peter had been Chaplain of the Senate for two years. he had not sought the job, nor wanted it at first.  In the beginning he had found it hard to believe that the Senators regarded his opening prayer as more than a necessary gesture.

Time and closer acquaintance between him and the men had changed that. The Senators were men of the world, not easily impressed with preachers. Yet Peter had earned their respect and the deep affection of the members on both sides of the aisle.

Elected by a Republican majority in 1947, he had been unanimously re-elected by the Democrats on December 31, 1948. On that day, Peter had telephoned me from the church office to tell me the news.  There was exultation in his voice.

"I'm glad, Catherine. At least it shows I convinced them that I have no politics."

The affection the Senators felt for their chaplain was reflected in the way Senator Arthur Vandenberg, who presided as president pro tempore of the Senate in the absence of the vice-[president, always called Peter "Dominie," the Dutch word for "Parson."

" To know Peter is to love him,"

Senator Vandenberg said.

"My chaplain is my intimate and priceless friend."

In deed many an astute observer on Capital Hill felt Senator Vandenberg's unobtrusive spiritual partnership with Peter Marshall had under-girded the increasing stature of his statesmanship, as he rose to become the architect of the

UNITED NATIONS

-and of America's first bipartisan foreign policy in many years.

On that Inauguration Day, the vista of an ever-growing and deepening ministry among all those men opened out before Peter.  long ago he had been

"tapped on the shoulder" by "the Chief"

-as he loved to call his lord.

Twenty-two years before he had landed at Ellis Island - an immigrant boy. God sent him into strange places to preach His message

It seemed to Peter that the old Senate Chamber was almost the strangest of all. Yet , there in the highest legislative hall in the nation, the Risen Christ and the wisdom of Almighty God were surely needed.  It thrilled Peter to have the chance to be Christ's representative in that PLACE.

The uncertain Washington sun broke through the heavy clouds as Harry S. Truman took the office as president of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

His left hand was resting on two bibles, a Gutenberg Bible and the White House Bible. His outstretched fingers covered passages from the Sermon on the Mount and the Ten Commandments as he intoned the solemn words:

"I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of the President of the United States, and will defend the Constitution...."

The sky umbrella of planes was already forming for the Inaugural parade as I made my way through the crush of people to our parked car. It was quite a while before my husband joined me. his rugged face was beaming.

 

"Guess what, Catherine ,"

he said as he opened the car door. the joy of a small boy was in his voice.

"What? What's happened?"

"Senator Vandenberg called me 'Peter' today!"

It was a small thing. But it represented the outstretched hand of friendship -the open door to a man's heart.

A long and dramatic train of events had led Peter Marshall to that memorable day. The story has about it the feel of a Biblical saga; yet, it is a story of a modern man, a warmly human man.

As I write I see a procession of vivid mental pictures: A boy walking through a Scottish lane lined with rhododendron trying to hear God's call; a ship ploughing through the cold waters of the North Atlantic; a blast furnace in New Jersey; a boy on a train going south to Birmingham.  There are traces of wistfulness in the story, and a procession of the haunted hearts of men and women. There is much laughter -and sometimes a sob.

 

The story begins some thirty years ago in a grimy industrial city in Scotland.

[We shall touch on the first steps to his ministry at a later stage]

 

*          *         *

Soon to Follow

 

Excerpt from

 Chapter Nine

 

Washington - Opportunity Unlimited.

 

1937...

 

Peter's reputation as a "thrilling evangelical preacher" soon resulted in long lines of people waiting outside New York Avenue Church [Abraham Lincoln's Church] on a Sunday morning. Often four abreast, they were patient and cheerful about the wait. They hoped to be able to get into the sanctuary and find a seat. loud-speakers had to be installed in the Lincoln Chapel and the downstairs lecture room to handle the overflow crowds. When these rooms were filled, there was nothing left to do but turn would-be worshipers away.

*

 

[Font Altered -Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

 

*

 

PART 2

MARCH/07

 

 

 

H.F.1107-FREEDOM-AWAITS

 

 

 

 QUENTIN LETTS:-

 

 

Special relationship?Forget it.

This vicious, small-minded, careerist martinet of a Speaker has to get something off his preening chest

 
EXTRACT

ONE of these two men is an unstable egomaniac with smallish hands and a trophy wife. The other is Donald Trump.

One is vain, scornful of convention and reacts to criticism with an intolerance so wild you (wrongly) think he must have had one shandy too many. The other is teetotal Donald Trump,

Given how much they have in common, it may seem odd that the House of Commons  Speaker John Bercow thinks so little of the

AMERICAN PRESIDENT.

But in his basic character John Bercow is a mini Donald.

He is as greedy for attention and has the same inflated self-regard.

HE BOILS WITH IT.

Worst of all, both men appear to calculate that maximum advantage can be had in politics by creating division and hatred.

When asked about her relationship with Trump, our stolid Prime Minister, Theresa May observed that opposites can attract. By the same measure people, people with the similar characters often repel one another, as is plainly the case

HERE.

Rant...

With his red-eyed rant, Speaker Bercow has done several things. He has plunged his high office into controversy and has created an international row which has probably damaged our prospects of doing a post-BREXIT trade deal with the

TRUMP WHITE HOUSE.

He may also have irked the

 QUEEN

who invited Mr Trump in the first place

and expects people at the top of our public life to show better manners to visiting

HEADS OF STATE.

Mr Bercow delighted one side of the Commons (his remarks won a round of applause from the

SCOTS NATS

and there was similar partisanship during proceedings yesterday.

Such creation of division along party lines is unhealthy for, if not deadly to, the supposedly

IMPARTIAL POST

OF

SPEAKER.

Most of all, Mr Bercow has secured himself publicly. He has even made it onto the TV news in

AMERICA.

This, for him, will be richly satisfying, possibly in a literal sense. For, due to step down next year, he may be on the hunt for a big international post. This weeks events may in some way have been a job application.

The greatest Speaker in history was William Lenthall, who occupied the Chair during the English Civil War.

Parliament was in open conflict with the Monarchy and Lenhall was a diplomatic and level-headed presence. Had the Speaker at that time been more excitable temperament the Civil War might have been even bloodier than it was.

It was Lenthall who blocked Charles 1 as he tried to enter the Commons with some heavies, demanding to know the whereabouts of some MPs who had criticised him.

He clearly intended those men harm. Lenthall, with dignity and bravery, knelt before the furious Monarch and said:

'May it please your Majesty, I have neither eyes to see nor tongue to speAk in this place but to direct me, whose servant I am here.'

That moment encapsulated not only the independence of the Commons from the Crown, but  also the limitations of the Speakership. Parliamentarians had their own power; the Speaker, as an individual, had none.

He was merely the servant of the people's representatives and they, in theory, were the servants of the electorate. It is hard to read Mr Bercow's conduct as a continuation of that vital tradition. What we saw was a politician ambitious for attention and driven by childish anger.

He had seen Michael Gove (who he has long despised) secure a major interview with Mr Trump in New York. He had seen Mrs May (whom he little likes) then triumph in Washington.

DID HE DECIDE TO PLUNGE A STICK IN THE WHEELS?

The words he spoke were not dry, calm verdict of a semi-judicial veteran assembling the facts of the matter or seeking to reduce the public temperature.

They were markedly more personal and incendiary.

Yesterday Mr Bercow claimed he was within his rights to speak out against Mr Trump.

THAT IS QUESTIONABLE

AT THE VERY LEAST, he snubbed Buckingham Palace. More seriously, he failed to represent the settled will of the Commons.

He was off-piste, blatantly so, and it was not just Tory MPS who were appalled. Some Labour Members were queasy about his behaviour.

Perhaps Labour sensed that he has become unhealthily close to their sworn foes, the

SCOTTISH NATIONALISTS.

Of course, this is not the first scrape the Speaker has landed himself in. The surest way to ,analyse John Bercow has always been through the perism of his character.

If his Speakership is remembered chiefly for its

RANCOUR AND RUDENESS ,

that will only be a reflection of his

 

UNHAPPY, POLITICALLY ROOTLESS ,ITCHY PERSONALITY.

High-minded commentators sometimes lecture us that it is wrong to make too much of the

PERSONAL IN POLITICS,

but in nthe case of men so vivid and unpredictable as

MR BERCOW

and, for that matter, Mr Trump) ,that becomes

IMPOSSIBLE

 

This is a creature driven by molten moods and door -kicking tantrums. Philosophy really has little to do with his politics.

Having observed Mr Bercow closely since he became an MP in 1997, I was not surprised by his performance on Monday

[February 6, 2017]

 

*

Exploited...

 

Throughout his career, John Bercow has happily exploited sulphurous disagreements to buttress his personal position.

He did that in his early days as a Tory activist, when he was an objectionable oik in the racist Monday Club.

Young Bercow was a Uriah Heap-like hanger -on to Right-wing grotesques. These men taught this taxi-driver's son top speak with a plum in his mouth-something that accentuates the impression

HE IS A FAKE

It has been said that the youthful Bercow once led a

'HANG MANDELA' campaign

Having entered the Commons as an unpleasant Rightie, Bercow (whose Buckingham seat is in the Tory heartlands) saw his prospects were limited and realised he needed to change his uncouth vies to prosper.

Views yes, character no. Shedding pretty much his whole Conservative persona would certainly help him win Labour support for the Speakership.

He did this

 by mocking MPs on his own side and by sucking up to the

POLITICALLY CORRECT WING OF THE LABOUR PARTY

His postering would have put a

PEACOCK to SHAME.

Harriet Harman, Ed Balls. Ed Miliband & Co. saw what was going on and shrewdly went along with it

 as a way of destabilising the Tories.

 

Rudeness...

His chance came when Labour's Michael Martin was drummed out of the Speakership in 2009 as the highest-profile victim of the MPs' expenses scandal (thanks not least to manoeuvring by Bercow) Subsequently, Bercow swept into the job thanks to the Labour whips.

Some of us warned that he was a wrong'un, but we were ignored. Lo and behold, he was soon criticised for bias against the Tories and there were horror stories about his nastiness to his staff.

THUS HAS IT CONTINUED

Mr Bercow has been extravagant with public money, spending thousands on foreign travel and on taxis. He has inserted his little favourites on committees.

He has shown extraordinary tolerance of the disgraced Labour MP Keith Vaz and has treated less favoured MPs with lacerating rudeness.

His marital life with the lurid Sally, who is just as addicted to self-promotion as him, has also been a dreadful mess.

And with his ban on Trump, he's unprecedently involved the Speakership in foreign policy, and an area linked to the most controversial domestic policy of all,

BREXIT

Alas, this will leave White House officials seeing that their new President, already besieged by the shrieking international left, has now been insulted by the Speaker of the British House of Commons.

All the good vibes of Theresa May's Washington visit may have been forgotten.  Vital diplomatic work may have been trashed. All because this vicious, careerist, small-minded martinet felt like getting something off his preening chest.

 

*

TO BE CONTINUED

 

Full article

*

ADDED FEBRUARY 14-2017

 FROM

DAILY MAIL

Ephraim

Hardcastle

COLUMN

 SPEAKER John Bercow who controversially told Reading University students he voted REMAIN, informed scholars at BUCKINGHAM UNIVERSITY in 1998:

The people of Britain will never knowingly consent to be governed by those who do not speak their language, live in their country or depend yupon their votes. The power of self, the right to hire and fire our rulers and the capacity to chart our vown destiny are inalienable birthrights . They should not be traded in for a mess of pottage otherwise known as a back row seat at a show called

THE HEART OF EUROPE.

Our destiny is surely as a self governing nation which trades freely with the world. The future is bright; the future is global. Our success in it is dependent upon the vision, self confidence and calibre of our leaders, our bbusinesses and our workforce.'

My source there adds: His speach was such a Eurosceptic tour de force that the Bruges Group printed it as a pamphlet.' Fancy!

 

 

 

 

 
 [LETTER]

For the Honourable William Lenthall, Speaker of the Commons

House of Parliament: these,

Sir                              Harborough, 14th June, 1645           

Being commanded by you to this service, I think myself bound to acquaint you with the good hand of God towards you and us.

We marched yesterday after the King, who went before us from Daventry to Harborough; and quartered about six miles from him.  This day we marched before him.  He drew out to meet us; both Armies engaged.  We, after three hours fight very doubtful, at last routed his Army; killed and took about 5000,-very many officers, but of what quality we yet know not.   We took also about 200 carriages, all he had; and all his guns, being 12 in number, whereof two were demi-cannon, two demi-culverins, and I think the rest sackers.  We pursued the Enemy from three miles short of Harborough to nine beyond, even to the sight of Leicester, whither the King fled.

Sir, this is none other but the hand of God; and to Him alone belongs the glory, wherein none are to share with Him.  The General served you with all faithfulness and honour: and the best commendation I can give him is, That I daresay he attributed all to God, and would rather perish than assume to himself. Which is an honest and a thriving way:-and yet as much for bravery may be given to him, in this action.  Sir, they are trusty; I beseech you, in the name of God, not to discourage them. I wish this action may beget thankfulness and humility in all that are concerned in it.  He that ventures his life for liberty of his country, I wish he trust God for the liberty of his conscience, and you for the liberty he fights for.  In this he rests, who is

Your most humble servant,

OLIVER CROMWELL

*

[Page 171-PART II FIRST CIVIL WAR-14th June 1645-LETTERSXXiX., NASEBY-OLIVER CROMWELL'S LETTERS AND SPEECHES by THOMAS CARLYLE-1888 ]

*

'We have to deal with events which belong essentially to Constitutional History, and must treat them with a light touch, that we may not trespass on appropriated ground.  Our topics, how absolute monarchy, which just then succeeded so brilliantly over the Channel, was attempted in England, under conditions of no apparent danger, failed and failed at great cost. And how, in the curse of the struggle, ideas were developed which proved ultimately strong enough, as well as sufficiently lasting, to carry out an entirely new structure of constitutional government. It is the point where the history of nations turned into the modern bed. It is the point also where the Englishman became the leader of the world.'

THE PURITAN REVOLUTION

Last paragraph-Page 205

LECTURES ON MODERN HISTORY

BY

JOHN EMERICH EDWARD DALBERG-ACTON

First Baron ACTON. D.C.L  LL.D., ETC. ETC.

1926

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

FEBRUARY 8-2017

H. F.1108 FREEDOM-AWAITS

 
 
 
  •  
     

    US and China are both busy

     

    with internal power struggles

     

    so the world will have to wait

     

    Posted by benjamin

     

    February 13, 2017

     

    There are intense power struggles taking place in the United States and China these days meaning that big new initiatives for the planet as a whole will have to wait until the dust settles in both countries, Chinese and American sources say.

    The struggle in the United States is, to simplify things somewhat, between the deep state faction behind Trump and the remnants of the Bush/Clinton deep state apparatus. In China, three main factions are duking it out as part of an elaborate power dance that will produce a new central government line up sometime around the end of March.

    When these power struggles are over, then we can expect major reforms of the Federal Reserve Board, the United Nations, the IMF, the EU etc. to begin in earnest.

    Let us start with the US power struggle, which has intensified now that Jeff Sessions has been formally appointed Attorney General. Immediately following his appointment Trump issued an executive order that “re-focuses the Federal Government’s energy and resources on dismantling transnational criminal organizations, such as drug cartels.” As a Pentagon official described it “Trump declared war on the Bushes and Mexican drug cartels.”

    Furthermore, in a sign the anti-drug cowboys in the military and US agencies are finally getting the message that force alone will not stop illegal drug use, Pentagon officials are saying Trump may decide legalize and regulate narcotics. This would help bring the roughly $2 trillion annual illegal drug business into the tax paying mainstream and reduce drug related death. If done properly, the massive pharmaceutical industry could be brought on board as long as they were given a role. That should be easy to do since already around 30% of drugs prescribed by doctors are opium based. The drug companies could add a whole new menu of goodies doctors could offer patients if they could start making medicines based on the other major narcotics.

    Doing this would also devastate the US private prison slave industry by releasing half of the 9.5 million Americans who are either in jail or on parole.

    It would also radically lower crime rates. Ask the Swiss, who experienced an 80% drop in crimes committed by junkies immediately after they started letting doctors administer heroin to addicts. Most of the junkies were also able to eventually kick their addictions.

    http://www.citizensopposingprohibition.org/resources/swiss-heroin-assisted-treatment-1994-2009-summary/

    Since 90% of the world’s heroin is produced in Afghanistan, legalization and regulation of its opium crop would most likely lead to peace in that country.

    The Trump administration is also talking about stopping CIA drug shipments that go via US military bases. In Japan, for example, the Yokota airbase has long been a central distribution hub for North Korean amphetamines, according to senior Japanese gangsters. Shutting that trade down or else legalizing it would help clean up the Japanese political system big time. The same is true with the heroin trade going via other big US Airforce bases such as Incirlink in Turkey and Ramstein in Germany.

    With so much money and power at stake though, you can be sure though that the Bush faction is not going down without a fight. The entire ISIS/Mossad/Bush CIA/Nazi (Khazarian mafia Nazi faction) nexus is on the warpath and the fact that prominent ISIS linked criminals like Senator John McCain have not been arrested yet shows the power struggle is not nearly over. The Khazarian Nazis have been blackmailing the Pentagon White Hats with

     

    This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
    If you registerd,please     login.

     

    Organized Crime
     
 

The long awaited arrests of cabalists are supposed to start this week

 

Posted by benjamin

February 6, 2017
 

Multiple sources confirm that about 70 arrest warrants will be served on power brokers and politicians in Washinton DC, Virginia and New York this week shortly after Jeff Sessions is confirmed as US Attorney General. Among those to be arrested are Democratic Senators Chuck Schumer, Richard Blumenthal and Hillary Clinton’s vice-president pick Tim Kaine, Pentagon sources say. These arrests will follow 474 arrests that took place in California last week as a pedophile ring that served Hollywood and West Coast elites was taken down. It is interesting to note the California arrests were only reported by local news outlets and completely ignored by the big corporate networks.

http://abc13.com/news/474-arrested-in-california-human-trafficking-stings/1734315/

Former US President Bill Clinton is also reported to be “singing like a canary” and has provided evidence that will lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton and many others, Pentagon sources say. Here is what a Pentagon source had to say on the matter “Hillary is toast as Obama refused to pardon, Bill snitched on her, and her prosecution has been ordered by Trump.” There are credible tabloid news reports that Hillary was caught trying to flee to Bahrain and stopped.

http://www.globemagazine.com/content/clinton-stopped-her-tracks

There are also preliminary reports saying a raid was made on Jeffrey Epsteins’ Caribbean sex slave Island and that 32 kids were freed and 8 traffickers were arrested.

https://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/828344311016075264

There is also going to be a more hidden and brutal power struggle going on in the secret agencies as “CIA Deputy Director Gina Haspel was chosen to rendition to black sites and torture cabal, drug cartel and ISIS guys,” a Pentagon source says.

There is also, as is often the case, high level intrigue and skullduggery going inside the Vatican. This has been widely reported by the corporate media in the form of news that Pope Francis fired Grand Master Mathew Festing of the Knights of Malta in a “dispute over condoms.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/25/knights-malta-head-resigns-dispute-vatican-spokesperson/

If you look at the membership list of the Knights of Malta,

https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/kmlst1.htm

it reads like a who’s who of the globalist elite full of names like Rockefeller, Bush, Rothschild etc. so you can tell that this is about more than just “condoms.”
In fact, according to sources in the Vatican Secret Service, what really happened was that the Knights of Malta’s top brass were caught
(ここから有料)
 

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

 

Geo-politics
 

Links
 

Posted by benjamin

February 6, 2017
 
February 6, 2017
Posted by benjamin

 

 

H.F.1106 FREEDOM-AWAITS!

 

 

 

The MPs who snubbed Corbyn (and the voters)

 

 

LABOUR MPs WHO REBELLED

EVEN THOUGH THEIR CONSTITUENTS VOTED BREXIT

*    Graham Allen (Nottingham North)

*    Ann Clwyd   (CynonValley)  

*     Paul Farrelly (Labour, Newcastle-Under-Lyme

*     Catherine McKinnell (Labour, Newcastle upon Tyne North)  

*      Dr Alan Whitehead (Southampton,Test-also a frontbencher           

THE FRONTBENCHERS-MINISTERS  and WHIPS

*   Dr Rosena Allin-Khan (Tooting)

*   Kevin Brennan (Cardiff West)

*   Lyn Brown (West Ham)

*   Ruth Cadbury (Brentford and Isleworth)

*   Thangam Debbonaire (Bristol West)

*   Vicky Foxcroft (Lewisham)

*   Rupa Huq (Ealing Central and Acton)

*   Stephen Pound (Ealing North)

*   Andy Slaughter (Hammersmith)

*   Jeff Smith (Manchester Withington)

*   Catherine West (Hornsey and Wood Green)

*   Daniel Zeichner (Cambridge)

   OTHER LABOUR MPs WHO ALSO REBELLED.

 

*   Heildi Alexander (Lewisham East)

*   Rushanara Ali (Bethnal Green and Bow)

*   Luciana Berger (Liverpool Wavertree)

*   Ben Bradshaw (Exeter)

*   Chris Bryant (Rhondda)

*   Karen Black (Westminster North)

*   Dawn Butler (Brent Central)

*   Ann Coffey (Stockport)

*   Neil Coyle (Bermondsey and Southwark)

*   Mary Creagh (Labour, Wakefield)

*   Stella Creasy (Walthamstow)

*   Stephen Doughty (Cardiff South Penarth)

*   Jim Dowd (Lewisham West and Penge)

*   Maria Eagle (Garston and Halewood)

*   Louise Ellman (Liverpool Riverside)

*   Mick Gapes (Ilford South)

*   Lillian Greenwood (Nottingham South)

*   Helen Hayes (Dulwich and West Norwood)

*   Meg Hillier (Hackney South and Shoreditch)

*   Peter Kyle (Hove)

*   David Lammy (Tottenham)

*   Rachael Maskell (York Central)

*   Kerry McCathy (Bristol East)

*   Madeleine Moon (Bridgend)

*   Ian Murray (Edinburgh South)

*   Virendra Sharma (Ealing Southal)

*   Tulip Siddiq (Hampstead and Kilburn)

*   Owen Smith Pontypridd)

*   Jo Stevens (Cardiff Central)

*   Stephen Timms (East Ham)

     LIBDEM MPs WHO VOTED NO

*   Tom Brake (Carlshalton and Wallington)

*   Alistair Carmichael (Orkney and Shetland)

*   Nick Clegg (Sheffield Hallam)

*   Tim Farron (Westmorland and Lonsdale)

*   John Pugh (Southport

*   Mark Williams (Ceredigion)

...AND THE ONE TORY

* Kenneth Clarke (Rushcliffe)

   AND TOO POORLY TO VOTE

*   Diane Abbott (Hackney North and Stoke Newington)

 

DAILY MAIL-FEBRUARY 2, 2017

by Daniel Martin and Jason Groves

*

[REMEMBER THEIR BETRAYAL

AT THE NEXT ELECTION]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 DAILY MAIL-FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

 

H.F.1104 FREEDOM -AWAITS!
 
 

Daily Mail

 

 

 

Police tap media phones and PM tries to get editor sacked -by Stephen Glover- Daily Mail

 

POLICE TAPPING JOURNALISTS' PHONES, A PM TRYING TO GET AN EDITOR SACKED. NO, NOT RUSSIA...BRITAIN

 

...Like most people, I suspect when I was young I used to trust in the fair-play , fundamental decency, moderation and good sense of the police and other official bodies. I no longer do.

How could one after all that has happened?

I no longer think the authorities generally believe in the

RIGHT OF THE PRESS

 to freely report without fear or favour, though of course there are exceptions. As the State ever bigger and more intrusive, its tendency to conceal acts of injustice or its own sheer ineptitude grows stronger.

Which brings me to the second instance of gross interference. On Tuesday,31st January,BBC2's Newsnight broadcast an item alleging that during the EU referendum campaign

DAVID CAMERON

tried to secure the dismissal of the Editor of this newspaper, because of his stance on

BREXIT.

According to the item, Mr Cameron fruitlessly attempted to persuade the Mail's proprietor

LORD ROTHERMERE

that its Editor should go lest this newspaper's pro-Leave sentiments de-rail the Prime Minister's  ambition for Britain to stay in the EU...

But  let us not get too tangled up with the personalities involved.  It is surely deeply troubling that any British prime minister should scheme to remove an editor with whom he disagrees. In Turkey, President Erdogan, will send his heavies to a newspaper office, or he will arrest editors and journalists he doesn't like. That's what happens in many countries we like to think of as crude or uncivilised , including

RUSSIA and CHINA.

We imagine things are done differently here, but isn't it really a question of style? David Cameron is smooth and sleek and has good manners-not a risible thug such as Erdogan or Putin who will send in the bully-boys.

Yet I know that while Opposition leader he secured his dismissal of a highly critical columnist from a national paper, and later conspired to get rid of another. Now we discover he strove unsuccessfully to

FINISH OFF AN EDITOR WHO DARED TO STAND IN HIS WAY...

Full article!

 

[Some time ago we expressed our opinion that David Cameron was a perfect example of a chameleon - an inconstant person-unpredictable...This was bound to happen in a country such as England which had forgotten its roots-its history -its culture-its priceless inheritance - until the 23rd June 2016. It's association over 44 years with the undemocratic-unaccountable-power-hungry elite of the European Union had almost destroyed its once NATIONAL SPIRIT and INTEGRITY passed on from previous ages. In the nick of time the PEOPLE awoke from their complacent slumber and asked for THEIR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT COUNTRY-BACK!

 

 

FEBRUARY 2 - 2017

H.F.1102  AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM -AWAITS-

 

 
 
 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

I tremble for the Monarchy's future, says STEPHEN GLOVER   ...

 

 

Why I tremble for the Monarchy

 

We've tolerated his outspoken views on homeopathy and architecture. But suddenly, as he nears the throne, Charles is pontificating on such explosive political subjects such as immigration and populism-with allusions to Trump, Brexit and Nazism. This ,says

STEPHEN GLOVER,

 is verging on the

LUNATIC.

 

SATURDAY

 ESSAY

 by

STEPHEN GLOVER |

FEBRUARY 4, 2017

 

 EXTRACT

FOR many years, Prince Charles has unburdened himself of his views on architecture, homeopathy, organic farming, climate change

...And though I'm concerned that he may rub up President Trump the wrong way, I am even more worried about the damage he may do to the

MONARCHY.

it has many dormant enemies, however popular the Queen may be.

There  is a particularly moving scene in the TV series

THE CROWN

produced by Netfix

The young Queen Elisabeth is given a lesson about her exalted position by her grandmother, Queen Mary, widow of George v.

Elisabeth says it doesn't 'feel right as head of state to say and do nothing'.

Queen Mary replies:

It is exactly right. To do nothing is the hardest job of all. It will take all your energy.

'To be impartial is not natural, not human. People always want you to smile, agree or frown, but the minute you do, you will have declared a position - a point of view.

THAT IS ONE THING AS SOVEREIGN YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DO.'

It is a hard lesson for any intelligent person to learn, but Queen Elisabeth adopted it at an early age. It has been an act of extraordinary sacrifice to hold her peace while all around her are giving vent to their opinions - to watch speechlessly in the public sphere, as the world around her changed.

At the age  of 68,, Prince Charles still thinks he has the right to speak his mind. In fact, he is growing more forthright. I'm afraid he does not- when it comes to

KEEPING HIS MOUTH

SHUT

begin to understand what sacrifice entails

I don't know who can save the Prince from himself. His mother? Father? Wife?

It is very late in the day. The truth is that he is a gifted man. But he is also self-indulgent one with a diminishing

SENSE OF DANGER

At the eleventh hour the Prince of Wales could still follow the noble example of his mother,

AND UNITE RATHER THAN DIVIDE THE COUNTRY

But I fear that he has no intention of doing so -which is why

I REALLY DO TREMBLE FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR GREAT MONARCHY.

*  *  *

 

Full article

FEBRUARY 4, 2017

 

H.F.1095 FREEDOM AWAITS!

 

 
 
Daily Mail

Comment

 

Geezers, pussies and a bonkers Britain

IT is a grave concern to any country when police, magistrates  and other authorities collectively lose their marbles. But if two court cases in this week's news are our guide, this is what is happening in modern Britain.

In the first, a women was hauled before a judge for nothing more serious than calling a man a 'pussy'.

To all appearances, Aga Czachowski, 31 didn't even use the word in its obscene, Trumpian sense. Rather, she employed it in its time-honoured meaning as a mild insult, suggesting timidity.

Yet extraordinary, the justice system cranked into action against her. And after she admitted sending a communication of an 'indecent or offensive nature', a judge had no choice but to sentence her-albeit to a conditional discharge.

In the second case, revealed by the Mail today, entrepreneur Vernon Mussington was convicted of a hate crime by Luton magistrates after saying 'all right geezer' to a transgender Afghanistan veteran who 'identifies as a women'.

Though he swore he was unaware former RAF reservist Joanne Gullon regarded herself as female, he was made to pay £360 and sentenced to 150 hours' of community service. ONLY when he appealed after nearly a year of anxiety, was his conviction quashed.

With genuine crime on the increase, haven't police and courts better things to do with their time - and our money-than pursuing these piffling cases?

Mr Mussington's case is only the latest example of

THE POWER THAT BE

abandoning reason in their obsession with protecting transgender feelings.

In universities, sex-specific toilet signs have been changed to avoid giving offence. Schools are allowing boys who think of themselves as girls to wear skirts. Only last weekend, the BMA even told doctors to stop calling pregnant women 'expectant mothers' for fear of upsetting any who might see themselves as fathers - to - be.

This paper has great sympathy with people who are unhappy about their sex.

BUT WHATEVER HAPPENED TO COMMON SENSE?

IS EVERYONE IN AUTHORITY GOING STARK, STARING BONKERS?

Full article

 

*  *  *

[This is the inevitable result of loss of humour and that once give - and - take attitude so reminiscent many decades ago -a  world known characteristic nature of our island people. But with the advent of the so-called European Union  and the Human Rights Act of 1998 and the following scourge of political correctness the sparkle of life has been gradually subdued by the actions of hardened individuals placing their demands for affirmative action rather than live as themselves without a special label and demand particular considerations which in the past was all about living together in society in free association and understanding and good humour.]

'Haste thee, nymph, and bring with the/Jest and youthful jollity,/Quips and cranks, and wanton wiles,/ Nods, and becks, and wreathed smiles.Ib.25.

JOHN MILTON

 

'With the fearful strain that is on me night and day, if I did not laugh I should die.'

Abraham Lincoln (1809-65)

'O. judgment, thou art fled to brutish beasts, and men have lost their reason.'

Shakespeare.

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1094FREEDOM-AWAITS!

 

 

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

 

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

 

 

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with

LONDONISTAN

 

 (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

 The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

 Diversity in the UK

 A ranking of social evils 

Multiculturalism and truth

 Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

 The aims of Localism

 

 

 

 

 H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

 

 

Daily Mail:

 

Fury as Npower blames smart meters for 15% surge in prices. Scottish Daily Mail
- 2017-02-04 - Weekender - By Victoria Bischoff Money Mail Deputy Editor

 

The' spy' in your home

Smart meters monitor how much gas and electricity households use by the second and use wireless signals to communicate to the supplier.

They put an end to estimated  bills and come with a screen that shows how much energy you are using to encourage customer to switch off lights and appliances. However, the £11 billion cost of installing them in homes by 2020 will mean higher bills.

Many who already have smart meters have complained that it stops working if they try to switch supplier.

Privacy campaigners have raised concerns that the meters can reveal details of a customer's activities.

*

[There is no mention of radiation which can invade the living accommodation of the householder and affect the health of the individual.]

 

 

Full article

FEBRUARY 4-2017

 

H.F.1105 FREEDOM-AWAITS

 

 
 

 

 

 
Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

 

A MATTER OF TREASON

The behaviour of our politicians over the past thirty-five years has confirmed the dangers of one-party rule which was warned of over two millennium ago . The greatest danger we face is from within BY THE TREASONABLE ACTIONS of many of our politicians and judges who should know better and those close to our sovereign Queen Elizabeth II the PRIVY COUNSELLORS of the REALM.
 
Before we proceed we will state the oaths taken by our Privy Counsellors to the Queen and also to the European Union. We are at a loss to understand how it is possible to take the oath to Queen and Country and yet still take the oath to the EU.
 
CONFLICT OF DUTIES AND LOYALTIES
 
THE UNITED KINGDOM
 
 THE OATH OF A PRIVY COUNSELLOR
 
'You do swear by Almighty God to be true and faithful Servant unto the Queen's Majesty's Privy Council. You will not know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted, done, or spoken against Her Majesty's Person. Honour, Crown, or Dignity Royal, but you will let and withstand the same to the uttermost of your Power, and either cause it to be revealed to her Majesty Herself, or to such of Her Privy Council as shall advertise Her Majesty of the same. You will, in all things to be removed, treated, and debated in Council, faithly and truly declare your Mind and Opinion. According to your Heart and Conscience; and will keep secret all Matters committed and revealed unto you, or that shall be treated of secretly in Council. And if any of the said Treaties or Counsels shall touch any of the Counsellors, you will not reveal it unto him, but will keep the same until such time as, by the Consent of Her Majesty, or of the Council, Publication shall be made thereof. You will in your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance unto the Queen's Majesty; and will assist and defend all Jurisdictions, Pre-eminence's, and Authorities, granted to her Majesty, annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, against all Foreign Princes, Persons, Prelates, States, or Potentates. And generally in all things you will do as a faithful and true Servant ought to do to Her Majesty. SO HELP ME GOD. '
 
 THE EUROPEAN UNION
 

The OATH SWORN BY COMMISSIONERS - BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
 
'I solemnly undertake to perform my duties in complete independence in the general interest of the Communities in carrying out my duties neither to seek nor to take instructions from my government or body, to refrain from any action incompatible with my duties. I formally note the undertaking of each member state to respect this principle and not to seek to influence members of the Commission in the performance of their task. I further undertake to respect both during and after my term of office the obligations arising therefrom and in particular the duty to behave with integrity and discretion as regards the acceptance after I have ceased to hold office of certain appointments or benefits. '
 
Our Constitution was only safe so long as our Representatives were persons of INTEGRITY unfortunately it is clear that any person owning allegiance to Her Majesty could not in all honesty sign the oath to the European Union. We have therefore in our midst many TRAITORS to her Majesty and to the people of these Islands. We hope one day to have these Traitors tried by a SUPREME Constitutional Court when England one day will return to being a FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of a Greater Britain. It is only a few decades ago when the last TRAITOR in England was" hanged by the neck until he was dead ". I t is our opinion that the actions of those who knowingly gave away the

 " Rights and Liberties "

of the English People

should suffer the maximum sentence prescribed by law, in memory of those millions of our people who gave their lives for their country, even in the last few weeks.
 
We will list every person that has had a hand in traitorously betraying this country in a TRAITORS GALLERY and see that these names are known by the people of this country. We ask anyone who is aware of anyone who has taken an Oath to let us know for inclusion in our list.
 
OVER TWO THOUSAND YEARS AGO THE FOLLOWING WORDS WERE SPOKEN BY A GREAT SENATOR OF ROME .
 
 " A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the TRAITOR moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the TRAITOR appears no TRAITOR; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A MURDERER IS LESS TO BE FEARED".
 
 CICERO , Marcus Tullius (106-43 B.C. ) Rom. Orator

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 
 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/  ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/ ****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY / ****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS
 

DAILY MAIL

 

WHY

 DOESN'T

 the

House of  Lords

move

to

BRUSSELS?

RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-

March 3, 2017

Why doesn't the House of Lords move to

BRUSSELS?

 
 

EXTRACT

NOT for the FIRST TIME, it fell to Norman Tebbit to speak for Britain.

Why was it, he asked his fellow members of the Lords, that they were elevating the

RIGHTS OF FOREIGNERS

over those of the

BRITISH PEOPLE.

'It seems to me the

FIRST DUTY of PARLIAMENT

of the

UNITED KINGDOM

is to care for the

INTERESTS OF THE CITIZENS OF THIS KINGDOM'

he  said.

'If we are to be concerned about the rights of anybody after

BREXIT

to live anywhere on this continent of Europe, it should be concern for the

RIGHTS  OF BRITISH PEOPLE

to live freely and peacefully in those other parts of Europe.

WHY

is everybody here today so excited about an amendment which looks after

FOREIGNERS

and

 NOT

THE BRITISH

Fair point. But judging by the reaction in the chamber, you'd have thought Norman had advocated rounding up all foreign nationals living in Britain and deporting them en masse, preferably by gunpoint. His perfectly accurate use of the word

'FOREIGNERS'

had some sensitive Lords and Ladies gasping for their breath and hissing their disapproval at this ghastly racist in their midst.

 Lord Skinhead of Chingford was, of course. merely questioning the demand that before triggering

ARTICLE 50

[ March 15 -2017?]

Theresa May gives a cast iron guarantee that

ALL

EU CITIZENS living in Britain will be allowed to stay after Brexit.

Actually, she's already tried to do that in exchange for a reciprocal assurance that the same will apply to UK citizens living in Europe.

BUT

she was knocked back by

ANGELA MERKEL

who refuses to enter any kind of negotiation until  the Brexit process is under way.

It has become almost compulsory for everyone to agree that those EU nationals who have settled here-keep the

RIGHT TO STAY.

AND it,s true that the majority of EU citizens who have arrived legally over the past few years make a valuable contribution to our economy.

BUT

could the same be said of some of the less desirable elements who have moved to Britain?

The Eastern European beggars and pickpockets littering the streets of our cities for instance, or the assorted criminals we can't deport because of the

EUROPEAN YUMAN RITES RACKET.

The Remoaners don't want to talk about

THEM

naturally.

And frankly, the Lords aren't really bothered about the RIGHTS of EU citizens living in Britain.

It  is merely a convenient device to try to

DISRUPT and IDEALLY PREVENT BRITAIN'S DEPARTURE from THE

[UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-SO-CALLED]

EUROPEAN UNION...

They hold the democratically expressed wishes of more than 17 million voters in contempt and will do everything they can to frustrate the result of the

 REFERENDUM.

Why else would they want to force Mother Theresa to declare her negotiating position in advance?

No one in their right mind shows their cards before bidding in a poker game. Not unless that want to get taken to the cleaners.

No self-respecting union leader or businessman would offer up one-sided concessions before negotiations had ever begun.

What the Remoaners refuse to accept is that Britain holds the winning hand. We buy more from the EU than they buy from us.

The Europeans realise that, which is why they are going to bluff for as long as possible. Can you imagine any politician in Europe behaving like the

REMAIN CAMP in BRITAIN?

Where's the European equivalent of

PROJECT FEAR, warning of the dire consequences of losing access to the lucrative BRITISH MARKET?

Where are the apocalyptic warning from the EUROPEAN BANK that millions of jobs will be lost and the EU will go into FINANCIAL MELTDOWN unless BRUSSELS can strike a favourable DEAL WITH THE UK?

Where are the demands in Britain that Mrs Merkel offers

BRITISH MANUFACTURERS FREE TRADE

for BMW, Mercedes and Audi being allowed to continue to selling

TARIFF-FREE in BRITAIN.

WHERE'S Holland's answer to Anna Soubry touring the TV and radio studios in the Netherlands, complaining tearfully that the Dutch economy is doomed unless they give Britain everything she wants?

Why aren't French hardliners marching down the Champs Elysees, smashing windows and setting fire to police cars, demanding that Paris must agree unconditionally to BRITAIN'S TERMS so they can carry on exporting thie

CHEESES, WINES and MEAT? I don't recall the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT passing a MOTION forcing Jean-Claude Drunker to make any concessions to BRITAIN before the FORMAL BREXIT TALKS START.

And unless I've missed something, how many former

 GERMAN CHANCELLORS-FRENCH PRESIDENTS and ITALIAN PRIME MINISTERS have OPENLY SIDED WITH BRITAIN, in the same way that

 BLAIR and MAJOR

HAVE BACKED EUROPE AGAINST THEIR OWN PEOPLE?

NO,

all we've heard from across the CHANNEL are THREATS to PUNISH US, to CRIPPLE US ECONOMICALLY, to MAKE OUR LIVES HELL ONCE WE ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO LEAVE THE EU.

YET

the overwhelming instinct of our

TRAITOROUS

POLITICAL CLASS

is to bind the hands of our negotiators, to

APPEASE, COMPROMISE and ultimately SURRENDER-with the UNELECTED HOUSE OF LORDS acting as a PRO-BRUSSELS FIFTH COLUMN,

determined to

BETRAY THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE THEY ARE PAID TO REPRESENT..

Are they setting themselves up as

EU's VICHY GOVERNMENT?

MAYBE THEY SHOULD MOVE TO BRUSSELS.

IN wartime, they'd have been put up against a wall and shot

[AND THERE WOULD BE PLENTY OF VOLUNTEERS TO DO JUST THIS TODAY IN MARCH 2017.]

It's a pity Norman Tebbit isn't a few years younger. We could have put him in charge of the Brexit negotiations.

AT LEAST HE'D SPEAK FOR BRITAIN.

*  *  *

 

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MARCH 3 -2017

H. F.1126 FREEDOM NOW

 

Brought Forward from MARCH-2007

 

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

 

[GERMANY]

 

*

In our infrastructure in our politicians in our institutions in our communities

BUT STILL MANY WON'T FACE FACTS

*

Winston Churchill said over 50 years ago that:

"The Germans, after all had been belligerent for over 2000 years." "They never change."  How soon his words of wisdom and warning are forgotten.  Europe's leaders may not even fully understand what the GEU (German EU) is about. From 1999 to 2001 foreign companies took over 2,779 U.S. companies (worth $766 billion dollars) in an economic Blitzkrieg: mainly Germany , using France as junior aide, to ward off come-backs. How were such sales and so much money contrived?

 

[Before we answer this question and dozens of others we acknowledge the assistance of the following author whose record of being witness to the rise of Nazism in the 1930's and his close contact with those who were shaping the future of Germany. The following extracts are from his

'Germany's Four Reich's']

 

 

Harry Beckhough was born in Bristol in 1914. He is an Honours graduate of Bristol University in philology, specialising in German. Studying in Freiburg University in 1933 he witness Hitler's rise to power.

In WW II, he was commissioned in the Royal Artillery, served in India, until taken over by Bletchley Park, (Station x) as Codebreaker.  he served with the 8th Army, breaking Rommel's signals and messages for Montgomery. After Alamein victory, he was recalled to India to serve with 14th (Burma) Army, dealing with Japanese code signals.

On return home as Lt.Col.R.A./Int, he became S.O.I. (Senior Officer) with Foreign Office -with the remit to resuscitate the Rhineland Universities of Cologne and Bonn. There he met regularly, Dr Konrad Adenauer C.D.U., Chancellor of the first post- war German Government, members of his family and Ministers. Over 4 years, to end in  1950 he met many of the leading statesmen and prominent figures in Bonn, seat of the first post-war Government.

As an academic, in charge of the 2 Universities. they spoke freely to him of their plans the future. He has extensive knowledge of Germany, and has explored the development of its

AGGRESSIVE NATURE FROM ITS EARLIEST YEARS.

His book reveals that inherited desire for DOMINATION which has been GERMANY'S major characteristic through major wars and battles over centuries (2000 years), invariably ending in CHAOS, as exemplified by their German philosopher, NIETZSCHE.

Other books written by the author:

"Secret Communications"

"German Universities After WWII

" In the Beginning"

 

[We had the pleasure of meeting

 Mr Harry Beckhough

at a recent meeting of many concerned about the drift of our country into a United States of Europe. After we had read his most comprehensive analysis of the German 's FIRST - SECOND - THIRD and at the present FOURTH REICH we felt its contents needed a greater coverage as we are soon so near to Germany accomplishing her aim unless the people in our once free country take to the streets to defend their legacy of Rights and Liberties of 1500 years in the making. Those many years ago the Germanic tribes that settled in their new home of ENGLAND became because of their island isolation a different people from those who stayed in their homeland so we the ENGLISH should more than any race have and should understand the threat they pose to our present future in 2007.

 

In order to get the complete message to you all we intend to place a short weekly up-date of the books contents on our FRONT PAGE the few paragraphs will be identified by their background of black with red print as we do at the moment to identify the

German Nazi agencies at work in Europe and around the world today in 2007.]

*

 

Unusually we will start with the  final paragraphs of the book under the heading:

Epilogue: On the German Character.

 

Previous attempts to summarize the multi-sided character of the Germans, have proved beyond the scope of previous authors, historians, philosophers and psychologists, especially of their own people.

The German remains a complex people of many -sided facts. Their major development period, circa 1500 to 1800, eventually produced a linguistic, literary and philosophic form of unification, developing from Mittel-Hoch-Deutsch, to an overdone Romanticism period, which produced some of the greatest writers (especially Goethe), musicians of outstanding quality, and philosophers, claiming Judaeo-Hellenic roots.

Followed by the hugely overdone industrialization of the Bismarck period 1850 to 1914, from one extreme to another, suddenly changing from an agricultural country to extreme mechanical and industrial excess development. From a period of huge profits and great prosperity, flaunted to the world caricatures ,in final collapse and bankruptcy.

Finally the Hitler process of 'Gleichschaltung' (equalisation), seeking to create the impossible : a Nazi image of a one-type German Volk to become a national unit equivalent of Masters and slaves. But this unification only caused [pluralism - the fundamental split personality of the German -ever changing. The real German problem is unity in moderation and moderation in unity. He lacks reality, commonsense and good judgment. But invariably blames others for his troubles. But savagery always ready to burst forth at the slightest provocation.

 

He needs goals to be set by superiors, and is always ready to obey orders. Racism achieves domination and hegemony. he cannot clearly distinguish TRUE from FALSE, and confuses TRUTH with IDEOLOGY. Hence his love of intricate plots rarely reaching conclusion, getting lost or set astray with side issues.

 

He lives in a false world with distorted views conflicting TRUE and FALSE, GOOD and EVIL, PEACE and WAR. But seeks to TERRIFY and FRIGHTEN. He loves to organize, but loses his head if plans go awry, as happened with Hitler's rages, smashing order into chaos, and collapse of a scheme.

Above all he needs a strong leader, standing ready to obey, and follow. Without a Fuhrer, Germans become lost and confused. Generally hated for their arrogance, imperialism and brutal inhumanity, with outbursts of fury for little cause. But he enjoys his hatreds with a lethal intensity. "The ever-furious people" as [their] Nietzsche calls his 'Tauscher Volk'.

 

They are born wreckers -first of the Roman Empire, latterly of the League of Nations, now undermining both the United Nations and NATO. But their substitution, like their new Franco-German Constitution, may eventually collapse like a House of Cards, lacking a firm foundation, being constructed in hidden, mysteriously conceived, contrived and often confused plans, not properly finalized.

 

Pretending to act for the general good in a community of 'equals', their target is eventually revealed:

FIRST:-

an EU Super state,

- en route deviously to become a

German dominated Dictatorship.

We are coerced and invited to yield:

OUR SOVEREIGNTY

ANCIENT RIGHTS

and

HARD-WON

FREEDOM

-to become, for the first time in our history, a vassal state under the German jackboot. WWI and WWII should have taught us the brutal German reality.

 

I pray that our Leaders will remove their blinkers, to reveal German connivance in the reality of our appalling situation, in which we have been deceived and exploited since 1972. For this unhappy world once again is in sore need of our STRENGTH and GOOD LEADERSHIP, as a FREE BRITAIN, against the growing evil of TERRORISM, again endangering WORLD PEACE in the present century.

*

[As previously mentioned we shall be continuing with the remainder of Harry Beckhough's intensely researched book with further additions available on our FRONT PAGE.]

 

Key Features of German Deceit

In 1992 France became bound to Russia, as her agreed agent, to bring Russia into an extended European Federation -to promote collective security. In 1990 Professor Herzog denigrated the nation state, publicly identifying with Lenin's objective. The 1992 Maastricht Treaty then deprived EU nation states of key elements of their sovereignty; their currency, internal and external security, transferred, for the first time, to a European institution.

[Thanks a lot! Douglas Hurd our British Foreign Secretary at Maastricht  -WE don't of course - as that traitor to his country even was overheard after signing the Treaty to say:

'We'd better find out what we've just signed'

On that day in February 1992 after his committed Treachery to his country he was accompanied by the now  Conservative chairman Francis Maud another traitor to his true party's ideals and his country.]

Yet America's materialistic world seemed oblivious of the frightening reality, of the concealed intentions of this menacing, reborn German fast growing giant, with huge secret resources immediately available. Though the German Mark became worthless post-war, and the Black Market ruled a bargaining scene, until we created their new currency Mark in 1997/8, as I witnessed.

So whence came this sudden huge wealth?

Where was it stored in the Nazi era?

 

[YES! you have guessed right as you will have indicated on our Front Page]

Meanwhile, German military is rebuilding .fast and secretly as in 1920s/30s, using pseudo peace-keeping roles, as excuse to catch up with British military strength.

Playing a clever role in Kosovo, Croatia, being helpful in supplying peace-keeping troops, all undergoing strict home training. The old German trickery is still there, as deceitful and two-forked as ever. Adept at convincing lies, matching those of its Leninist? KGB trained ally, at the devil's trade of deceit, to which the West falls easy, trusting victim. Always with America especially ,in their sights (as also Britain), whilst proffering friendship. Now both the KGB-led Russian dictatorship and the

GEU (German European Union) Super state  

 

-are seeking global power and world domination by pseudo -peaceful means, using every trick [As our slippery Tony Blair and the other traitors] in their training.

These are aimed specifically at America and Britain, both economically and militarily.

 

Britain's so-called "New Labour" Government has recklessly thrown its lot in with German-led Europe.

[We would not be surprised if Tony Blair has his eyes on the new job of President of the New European Union should that monstrosity ever be brought into being. Of course we have already explained that we would NEVER agree to be part of such a collective Mammoth Police State and Evil conspiracy.]

America has fallen prey to every conceivable form of espionage in the 20/21st century from Russia, China, the East, Asia and the Arab world. But it is now learning fast not to put its trust in erstwhile 'Friends' in Europe, to the Arab world, from France to Arabia.  And to trade to its own well-protected and insured benefit, with trustworthy, proven allies, balancing gains and losses.

 

Thus America is now considering possible closure of well-established bases in Germany, and the danger of leaving these in the hands of a so-called friend.  Now known to be otherwise -preparing to bite the hand that restored it from its defeated collapse and misery, from a cruel, bloody War, started once again (as ever ) by Germany -never to be trusted, glorying in its success of LIES and DECEIT.

[It is to be remembered that the U.S. after WWII helped over 700 Nazi scientists and other callings under "OPERATION PAPERCLIP" to the United States and many used their influence and their successors also to foster the Nazi programme of future world domination  as clearly elaborated on by

 International Currency Review

Details on our Front Page

www.worldreports.org

cstory@worldreports.org

 *

Germany has been allowed, by its so readily trusting friend and hosts, to establish permanent military facility at Alamagordo, New Mexico, with (scarcely credible) an open -skies treaty for German planes flying over and surveying (and mapping) in totem. [As they did before the WWI and up to WWII when their people were everywhere in the Middle East and other areas mapping out future places of conflict] Something which needs 100% secrecy for complete safety. Even conducting training and joint military exercises - for German identification records.  Like Samson giving away the secret of his great strength - with resultant downfall, to his undoing. America should now look closely to her security.

Just as the Chinese were able to obtain all U.S. classified, most sensitive military, technical and nuclear information (painstakingly developed and built up over many years of highest quality operations, by most qualified American and British staff of highly trained experts - at tremendous cost and outstanding success) -simply by being able to tap into improperly guarded U.S. computer, technical system, without restriction and with minimum effort. Thus China, in quick time, learnt all U.S. secrets and was able to construct her own copies of U.S. nuclear warheads, with all technical know-how, and sell them on! Enough to make strong men weep!  But America has the resilience to ride its body-blows and restore terms with China.

Now German EU originally favoured, trusted and assisted by America [See Bilderbergers] , grows steadily stronger, militarily and economically-posing future menace, led by Germany, already seeking to undermine America in every way. Of course not openly, as is definitely not their nature, until ready for open combat -but through GEU.

Time we awoke [this was written  just a few years ago but in the closing months of 2006 there was a definite awakening as growing numbers are now joining the Anti-EU banner -see [http://eutruth.org.uk]

 to the dangers closing in on us, in this latest travesty of an all-embracing EU Constitution rending us [that means YOU!] in a vassal state [of the Fifth Reich].

 

ALL  20 of Germany's nuclear plants have unlimited licences.  200 American nuclear bombs are now in WMD storage vaults in EU states, with 55 in Germany.

 

The EU possesses 710 nuclear bombs. Germany has an advanced science and technology base, capable of supporting an advanced nuclear programme. This needs careful assessment for future consideration. Our British/American defence organisations seem to have no conception of this ongoing, tremendous build -up of power -with the sole aim of the creation of a

Super state Dictatorship

 

-with world control.

Whilst we continue to reduce our Armed Forces and equipment, Germany is quietly building hers (already more than equal to ours), with Europe providing the rest. They  have cleverly convinced first, Britain's P.M. Blair, and now America that they will not bypass NATO, when their intention is clearly to reduce NATO and then do away with it, leaving GEU German European Union in full power and able to argue with, if not threaten, America.

 

We learn in the Daily Mail of the 2nd February, 2007 that the NATO mission in Afghanistan is handing over leadership to an American commander - after all the trouble and fanfare to show NATO solidarity not so long ago. Obviously the Americans are learning a few lessons  of their own at this late state in the diplomacy game before they too find themselves with their defences completely useless after their long fraternisation programme in post-war Germany.]

Russia, in close co-operation with German since Bismarck, is seen both as partner and secretly, future target. The case of the Russian enclave, now cut off from Russia by the Independent Balkan states - Kaliningrad (formally Konigsberg, the centre of historic Prussia) presents a classic case of the German use of the EU, plus massive loans to Russia, to achieve expansion Eastward.

[Well we are all now aware that the Germans have a very-very-very close relationship with Russia in many fields BUT particularly in the Energy field. It will be a weapon that our enemy of the 20th century will use with its superior military forces at its time of choosing and we should all remember what happens when a country allows it military forces to become a ridiculed second rate pantomime show.]

 

The huge loans arranged for Russia by Germany, cause weighty instability for the Russian economy and political dependence of German goodwill, with calculated benefit and lack of interference with German plans.

Chancellor Kohl calculated that these major bonds would serve as a foundation for reconstruction of the Russian economy, and close co-operation with Germany. However the arrival of Putin, trained by KGB, may produce firmer self-interest by Russia.

Discussions progress on conversion of this huge German debt into equity stakes in Russian companies, which now have greater freedom to develop, especially in oil and commodities.

Chris Patten, EU Commissioner responsible for external affairs, has made the first steps (quoted by the Times), in discussing the possible political status of Kaliningrad in the enlarged EU -to suit German EU, whom he seems to serve more than his own country.

 

The Euro and the projected European Army (of envisaged great strength), are important major steps in the creation of the planned corporatist, anti-democratic, anti-nation state power, based on German Europe ,

as the EU Constitution of a Super state, to compete against American global strength and world authority. Always the great competitive target for global ambitious Germany.

*

Expanding by Ratchets

 

In 1970 the renewed German-Soviet Treaty for

"FRIENDSHIP and CO-OPERATION"

was signed, assuring their everlasting understanding -always included in Germany's secret plans for total reinstatement (already ipso facto regained)-and future control of greater Europe, both West and East -the same as ever target. It is truly amazing, on looking back, the ease with which Germany was able to deceive and convince America and Britain's leading Statesmen -but so did Gorbachev with his ready convincing stream of lies about his new Russia. Their joint ratchet found easy targets in the ever-trusting West.

 

East Germany overthrew their Communist regime in 1989, becoming one complete Germany again in 1990/91. The German democratic Republic became founder member of the Warsaw treaty Organisation, by the Warsaw Pact with Russia, then occupying the Russian Zone of Germany. The Berlin Wall built 1961, sealed off this Russian Zone from the West. In 1972 the Two Germany's signed a Pact of admittance to the United Nations. In 1991 came the overthrow of the Soviet government. Yeltsin and Gorbachev took power, expertly deceiving the West of their 'democratic' intentions.

In 1989 the Berlin Wall fell, bringing a neo-Nazi revival, cultivated strongly through the German Army (Bundeswehr). Nazi Germany came storming back as the communist stranglehold on East Germany was released. Violent racist incidents increased year on year to 1993.

In 1993 the Bundestag passed an asylum law, setting firm restrictions on immigrants seeking asylum. Still remaining anti-semitic, with disturbance of Jewish synagogues and cemeteries. Further reports of neo-Nazi revival in Germany.

In June 1991 the Bundestag voted to move their Capital back to Berlin  from Bonn (Adenauer's home town). May 1995 Manfred Roder -convicted Nazi terrorist- was invited to address the Bundeswehr [This has  memories of the Frederick Forsyth film the ODESSA-don't you think]

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall there are visible signs of return of the old spirit of independent arrogance, within the whole German nation. Now, again a bona fide word power, second only to the U.S. in arms exports,

with a standing army of circa 300,000, the largest in Europe

 

Already with France's help, leading the EU and soon to be recognised as a major nuclear power. Germany now back on top by usual clever manoeuving.

In 1990 a secret agreement between Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl accepted that the Bohemian and Moravian region belonged to the Germans.

ALSO

the final division of Czecho-slovakia and Yugoslavia by the end of 1992.

Germany planned to make a Customs Union of Europe, like Bismarck. Warnings by Roger Eatwell's: Fascism, Bernard Connolly's: THe Rotten Heart Of Europe and Margaret Thatcher's: The Downing Street years -

ALL GO UNHEEDED IN OUR SLEEPY APATHETIC NATION

Just as before WWII, with almost all Mainstream Press just as oblivious to the danger as they were before WWII.

[We have recently made a call to our at the moment FREE PRESS to open up the secret's of the EU but at a first glimmerings of activity it is obvious they only want to tinker out of harms way on the fringes of one of the GREATEST conspiracies in HISTORY. Possibly it is because after 50 years of backhanders and promises of special favours there are too many involved to bring the whole pack of cards to the ground. Who has the courage to start the ball rolling to collect up on its journey all the traitors and time-servers and to land on top of the Elite who have more to lose?

In 1995 Mrs Thatcher said in Parliament:

"You have not anchored Germany to Europe; you have anchored Europe to a newly dominant, unified Germany. In the end, my friends, you'll find it will not work."

Maybe not, but in the meantime they are expertly stirring the pot, causing ever more problems. [As no don't in February 2007].

Two years after the war-end, statistics now show that almost 50% of Bavarian civil servants belonged to the Nazi Party or its affiliates.

Of those dismissed by us, some 15,000 were reinstated. Almost all 11,000 teachers removed for political reasons were reinstated with 60% of the teaching staff employed by the German Ministry of Education and 81% of Judges, magistrates, prosecutors in the Ministry of Justice.

 Only in Universities were we able to keep good measure of control in the British Zone, by our direct command and control -with early denazification.

[It is obvious from the above that the Nazi Party continued in the main as it had always done but with for a time a lower profile awaiting their chance of future conquest which they have almost achieved in the early months of 2007.]

Inter-European unity has been long sought by the Hapsburg dynasty. Otto compared the similarities of the Holy Roman Empire of the Middle Ages with his own views on a destined

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

Churchill favoured a U.S.E. (United States of Europe) led by Britain. He said:

"It should be built by the British "

[Of course it would have been built on British values]

"If the Russians built it, there would be communism and squalor.

If the Germans built it there would be TYRANNY and BRUTE FORCE"

( Martin Gilbert: Churchill War Papers Vol 3)

 

How far-seeing!-[As we see today in February 2007]

 

Now in German control, as yet in shape unrealised by the victims, caught in a net of German deceit and empty promises [As with their agent Tony Blair in 2007], inexorably leading to complete mastery.

As the USSR faded into history , overtaken by the new KGB dictatorship, Germany, under its EU cloak, was already on its panned path to overtake America, with the size and growth of its extended economic values.

In May 1997, Roman Herzog (former German president), on being presented with the International Charlemagne Prize  for his efforts to unite Europe said:

 

"Charlemagne, himself , sought the unification of Europe -the truth must be told, only by wading through a sea of blood, sweat and tears, did he reach it. Germany has been Europe's greatest perpetrator, instigating that bloodshed."

[Well we have at least

1,250,000

Sacrifices

 

-places of rest - many in foreign fields in our struggles to overcome that perpetrator on two occasions in the 20th century

 

One wonders how Tony Blair came to be chosen for this prize? Joschka Fischer (ex Communist, now leader of the Green Party) said:

" Germany needs NOT democracy, but a system of Statecraft, similar to that of the Soviet dictatorship, enabling the German political and military elite to organise Europe's industrial capacity, and the military qualities of German people or of the revival of the German race, Europe is just an extension of Germany.

THAT SAID IT ALL

-with Fischer omniscient.

Yugoslavia was deliberately undermined by German Intelligence Service (bundesnachrichtendienst) under Klaus Kinkel, throughout the 1980's  using German agents working with former Croatian Fascists, close allies of Hitler (providing needed outlet for the Adriatic). They now destroyed the multi-ethnic state of Yugoslavia, arranging the breakaway of Catholic Croatia and Slovenia.

Marshall Tito established a new Constitution for Yugoslavia, known as the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. The Serbs had initiated the first union of the 3 nations, following the collapse of the Habsburg ruled Austro-Hungarian Empire, end of WWI in 1918. Tito broke with the Soviets, creating a new federal Republic, which lasted 30 years. But the political iron -will of Germany took only 10 years to break it

 

Milosovic may have been unfairly charged in the Hague -but Germany now has arranged a more compliant leader under her control. Once again Anglo-Americans have been fooled by German trickery.

 

German machinations in the Balkans in WWI were repeated in WWII. Yugoslavia, historical all of Britain against German imperialism, has now been broken up into the same religious and racial statelets the Nazi established: Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia had their own Waffen SS divisions.

In 1991 Germany followed by the Vatican, recognised Croatia, which massacred

1,000,000

Serbs-gypsies and Jews at Jasennovac concentration camp

The wartime Archbishop Stepinac, whose own priests helped run the extermination camp, was beatified by the present Pope in 2002!?

Albania was favoured by NATO as an ally of Germany, whilst operating the biggest drug and gun-running corridor through Kosovo and Tiranen. Germany gained control by outright purchase of their main asset, their chromite mines.

Albanians, in the historical Serb province of Kosovo, who has conducted massive ethnic cleansing of Serbs over 100 years, (with the help of Nazi during the war and Tito thereafter, were armed by Germany as

FREEDOM FIGHTERS

[For whose Freedom?]

Provoked by repeated terrorist attacks by Kosovo Freedom Fighters, the anticipated Serb response gave GERMAN-controlled Europe the excuse to lead NATO into an ILLEGAL war against a SOVEREIGN STATE -by cunning German contrivance. This served Germany's historical aim of destroying Serbia, helping to reclaim so-called German territory in the East, thus helping construction of German Europe, now the EU.

 

[And who do they agree to be dictator of Kosovo -Yes! you are right -Our own Bilderberger Paddy Ashdown who has only recently stood down to enjoy his retirement?

Similarly, with Macedonia the EU cleverly had NATO do all the donkey work, transforming it into a vassal state of the EU. So, if things go wrong, NATO will be blamed.

THUS ANOTHER CLEVER(?) GERMAN STROKE.

 

[The EU is all about NUMBERS and TERRITORY-They need to have ALL Europe under their control -there can be no exceptions. They have a deal with Russia as we shall find out to our cost when our energy supplies are restricted to achieve their blackmail terms. Mark our words the English people will rue the day it failed to keep a tight control over THEIR GOVERNMENT]

During the Second World War about

1,000,000

were massacred by Croation fascists. In 1989/90 came the first ethnic cleansing in Yugoslavia, after Germany officially recognised [their own WWII ally] Croatia, who established a blatantly nationalistic constitution discriminating against the SERBS. There are now over one million displaced Serbs, because of Germany's aggressive interference and plotting. In 1991 Germany unilaterally recognised Croatia and Slovenia as separate sovereign state, completing her astutely conceived DOMINATION of the BALTIC AREA.

Exporting $320 million dollars of hardware to Croatia, 4000 German troops in Croatia, the FIRST deployment of German troops [they now have over 300,000 troops in their Army] since WWII, to help enforce the so-called

'PEACE AGREEMENT'

[Typical NAZIS they create the unstable conditions in  the area by their hurried recognition of Croatia which served their purpose to arrive at the situation today. Tony Blair certainly had  good training in the same philosophy as our situation in February 2007 with only weeks away from him signing the March 2007

'DECLARATION OF BERLIN.'

[Note each of the above underlined words has a different bulletin.]

All the meddling and interference in  Croatia -All part of Germany's deep plan for overall

CONTROL of ALL EUROPE

-Both West and EAST, At the same time, settling old scores of WWII.

In the rest of Eastern Europe the agricultural economy has collapsed, because the EU prevents their exports to the West.  Their media, business and agricultural land are being acquired by Western European Business, especially German. Just as the NAZI planned in the 1930s, the national states of Europe, for whose freedom Britain and America fought two bloody wars, sacrificing their heroic young men, effectively, no longer exist as self-governing entities.

 

THE AFTERMATH OF WWII, WITH GERMANY NOW ESTABLISHED AS THE STRONGEST FORCE IN EUROPE

[NOW DO YOU BELIEVE YOUR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY IS IN

GREAT DANGER?]

 

*

 

To the Serbs -an Independent Kosovo is anathema -Kosovo is their Jerusalem

Germany as the Strongman of Europe-A germanised Empire in the Making - PART 1

The New Beginning  - PART2

Germany's Third Reich -PART 3

Taskmasters of Europe -PART 4

A Warning Message To The Freedom Loving People Of England by Harry Beckhough

*

http://eutruth.org.uk

*

The English with other Germanic tribes came to Britain over 1500 years ago. The streams of Teutonic influence decided the future of Europe.

A 62

 
 
DAILY MAIL

 

TYRANNY

 OF THE

MINORITY

 

Drip, drip, drip...a poisonous conviction is taking root on the LEFT and among the ELITE: ordinary people are too stupid to be trusted with voting.

It's THIS, not POPULISM that's the most sinister trend of our age.

*

 

TYRANNY OF THE MINORITY

DAILY MAIL-

SATURDAY

ESSAY

by Mike Hume

FEBRUARY 25,2017

 

BACK IN the 18th century, political reformer Henry Fox was advocating giving the vote to more people. But only, he insisted to what he called the better sort' Not 'the mob or the mere dregs of the people'. Heaven forbid!.

Now, in the 21st century such derogatory sentiments about 'the people' are dangerously back in fashion-ever since they dared

VOTE FOR BREXIT

in Britain

and for

DONALD TRUMP

in the

United States

Questions are being asked in high places about whether ordinary voters are

FIT TO MAKE DECISIONS ON MAJOR ISSUES

As a result,

DEMOCRACY-THE CORNERSTONE OF OUR WAY OF LIFE-

is being undermined, its very survival put at risk.

Its modern enemies are mustering from all corners-but most worryingly from the

LEFT

the very area where its stoutest defenders should be.

As a long-standing person of the LEFT, I fear that democratic freedoms are now in danger of being abandoned as elitists in our midst attempt to restrict them. Continued below:-*

*[This reminds us of a passage under the heading Democracy by the Dean of St Paul's- W. R. Inge (1932)

...Revolutions almost always occur on rising market. They are the result not of desperation but of aspiration. The first revolution, under Kerensky, was almost bloodless and seemed promising; but just as the Girondists were ousted by Robespierre and his gang of terrorists, so the Constitutional Democrats fell before the "Majority Men," the Bolsheviki. This was a revolt against democracy. As Lenin said in 1920 (he was often embarrassingly frank): " We have never spoken of liberty. We shall exercise the dictatorship until the

MAJORITY SUBMIT.

Trotsky was, if possible, more brutal.

"Democracy is a worthless and wretched masquerade. We repudiate it in the name of the proletariat. Three times hopeless is the idea of coming to power through Democracy  [AS the Elite sought to do in March 2017]

Lenin estimated that his party consisted of 500,000 persons out of 130 million, and that of the 500,000, 60 per cent were fools, 39 per cent, criminals, and 1 per cent convinced Communists! This remarkable syndicate of despots publishes its butcher's bill from time to time. A list in the Gaulois, which professes to come from Soviet sources, amounts to 1,800.000 killed in cold blood, classified according to status, rather more than half are peasants. AS Anatole France says, if you start with the supposition that men are naturally good and virtuous, you invariably end by wanting to kill all who do not  agree with you...]

*Continued from above:

Every serious politician and thinker declares his or her belief in democracy. Yet, in practice, they seek to separate power from the people. The mantra has become 'I'm a democrat, of course, but...'

Over Brexit , this profoundly insidious attitude was exemplified by John Major former Tory prime minister, who denied the referendum result was binding  and declared:

'The tyranny of the majority has never applied in a democracy.'

Some of us might naively have imagined that majority rule was the very essence of democracy.' But not it seems, when millions vote against the wishes of a tiny political elite.

It was, of course, George Orwell in his novel Animal Farm, who described how

 'All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.'

Fast-forward to today  and we find many REMAINERS similarly convinced that anyone who voted to LEAVE

[THE UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION]

IS TOO STUPID TO VOTE

The response was the same in America when voters failed to elect Hillary Clinton...

The reaction from those on the LEFT was the same when the American electorate handed Trump the keys to the

White House.

He had been  denounced as a disgrace to U.S. politics not only by the political establishment and the media but also by alpha intellectuals Beyonce and Jay-Z, Lady Gaga and Madonna, Jon Bon Jovi and Bruce Springsteen. How could Americans resist being dazzled by such a star-studded appeal, you might think?

Yet more than 62 million Americans

DID JUST THAT...

STILL the attempts went on to subvert the referendum result, with the intervention of the

COURTS.

First the LAW LORDS and then the SUPREME COURT

saw fit to overrule the express wishes of

17.4 MILLION LEAVE VOTERS

and tell the elected government it could not trigger

BREXIT

without the permission of

MPs and Lords in Parliament.

The same Parliament they had allowed to be overridden by Brussels for the previous 40 years

THEN there was the four-million-strong online petition calling on Parliament to hold another referendum that would require a larger margin of victory.

In similar vein was the letter signed by thousand top lawyers demanding that

Parliament must decide (i.e..vote for Remain)

The QC behind this initiative explained

'In times of crisis people often turn to lawyers to ask them how we should behave in society,'

The arrogance of the notion that the opinions of 1,000 lawyers-whose fees are an affront to civilised society- could outweigh those of

17.4 MILLION VOTERS

summed up the Remainers'

'Some are more equal than others'

outlook.

Even  now, the attempts continue to put

BREXIT

back in its bow, fueled by a sense that

 too much

DEMOCRACY is DANGEROUS.

 The Brexit referendum vote opened up the opportunity for a new kind of political debate about the

FUTURE OF OUR SOCIETY

engaging many who have previously

FELT EXCLUDED FROM PUBLIC LIFE.

Time and again, according to the

ELECTORAL REFORM SOCIETY

its researchers heard people say the

 EU REFERENDUM

 was the first time their vote

'HAD TRULY COUNTED'

They decided for themselves what the truth was about the EU, and made their own choice in defiance of whatever was flung at them by the

POLITICAL CLASS.

But the plain fact is that the

ELITE

in this country do not trust the mass of voters, believing we are

TOO UNINTELLIGENT-MISINFORMED AND EMOTIONAL

to make the right decisions on

IMPORTANT ISSUES.

Whichever side you took in June in the UK or November in the United States, we need to resist this with all our might.

The real issue should be to defend democratic principles against those who would tell us SOME VOTERS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS.

Aux armes, citoyens.

ADOPTED from revolting! by Mick Hume, published by William Collins at £6.99

To order a copy for £5.24 (offer valid to March 4) visit www.mailbookshop.co.uk, or call 0844 571 o0640 P&P free on orders over £15

Full Article

*  *  *

[[Those in the political elite are loath to share their POWER over the MASSES and only to those who think as they do. It is a POLITICAL CLUB with one aim to CONTROL the MANY by the FEW. WE have seen evidence of this in the last few days where MPs and LAW LORDS have received their PAY INCREASES while MANY ARE DYING BECAUSE OF lack of sufficient financial RESOURCES in the NHS- CARE HOMES ...YET AT THE SAME TIME we have a  FOREIGN AID BUDGET  OF 12BILLION much of it FRITTERED AWAY like CONFETTI IN THE WIND-AN OBSCENE - WANTON AND WASTEFUL EXTRAVAGANCE OF THE HARD-EARNED TAXES OF THE PEOPLE OF OUR NATION .IT SHOWS THE UTTER CONTEMPT OF THE POLITICAL CLASS IN THEIR AIM TO BE SPARING IN THEIR FINANCIAL HELP AT HOME WHILST PERMITTING THE DISGRACEFUL-DISGUSTING WASTE OF FINANCIAL PROBITY TO CONTINUE OVERSEAS.

 

THE MOST IMPORTANT FACT IS THAT ALL THE POLITICAL PARTIES AT WESTMINSTER-APART FROM UKIP WERE REMAIN ENTHUSIASTS BECAUSE THE COSY ELITIST POLITICAL SYSTEM DEVELOPED WITHIN THE EU OVER 43 YEARS BECAME AN EXCLUSIVE CLUB FOR THE EU MINDED ENTHUSIASTS AT WESTMINSTER AND IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND BEYOND. THE PRIZES EXTENDED INTO THE BRUSSEL'S LOTTERY OF BOUNTIFUL BENEFITS FOR LIFE. SELF-INTEREST AND GREED WERE ITS TRADE MARK
 IT WASN'T ABOUT COUNTRY
 IT WAS ABOUT SELF.]
 

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

FEBRUARY 25,2017

 

 

H.F.1121-FREEDOM AWAITS
 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS
 
 
 
 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

[THE EDP RECEIVED IN OCTOBER 2005 UNDER PLAIN COVER INFORMATION FROM WORLD REPORTS- MR CHRISTOPHER STORY ,WHICH WE IMMEDIATELY PUT ON OUR WEBSITE -MUCH IS SHOWN ABOVE -AS OF VITAL INTEREST TO THOSE WHO WISHED FOR THEIR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND TO BE RETURNED TO THEM AS A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE WHICH IN MARCH 2017 THE FIRST STEP WITH THE PASSING OF THE CLAUSE 50  BY PARLIAMENT WHICH WILL SEE OUR SOVEREIGNTY RETURNED TO US WITHIN TWO YEARS BUT SOONER IF POSSIBLE.

*FEBRUARY 27-2017

*

 

The Secret Government

The Secret Government

[This will explain why there has been no disclosure to the public of the traitorous activities of the RING of TRAITORS  from BALLIOL COLLEGE-OXFORD -

Edward Heath - Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Ribbon whereas those CAMBRIDGE COMMUNISTS were EXPOSED.

*

EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED AS ILLEGAL

 

 

A criminalized organisation

 

Monday 10th October, 2005- London.

 

BRITAIN CAN LEAVE

THIS ILLEGAL ‘FESTERING DUSTBIN OF CORRUPTION’ TOMORROW

 

The European Union Collective is illegal and so extensively criminalized that it has become all but indistinguishable from a criminal organization.

 It is illegal because key EU treaties were procured by means of slush fund payments.

 
It is criminal because, being born in corruption, its procedures are designed to mask the corrupt activities of many of its officials, while it publishes false accounts.
 
Britain is free to leave immediately, as explained below.

 

These findings are published today the 10th October, 2005 in the latest issue of International Currency Review, the London -based Journal of the International Financial Community.

 

·                The fraudulence of the European Commission’s accounts necessitates urgent consideration of its Triple-A Credit Rating by the leading Rating Agencies. Precise evidence of the fraudulence of the EC’s accounts is presented in the issue. (Normally this scandalous state of affairs is ‘successfully’ shoved under the carpet).

·                International Currency Review has advised the agencies accordingly, and anticipates that they will carry out the necessary overdue reassessment of the EU’s ‘integrity’. In the event that zero action is taken, given the extreme gravity of the evidence of institutionalized accounting fraud presented in the journal, the integrity of the Credit Rating Agencies themselves may be called into question - not least by International Currency Review.

 

This may have repercussions for the International Financial Community generally.

*

WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS ILLEGAL AND ILLEGITIMATE

 

But first things first. The illegitimacy and illegality of the European Union-and thus of ALL its constituent structures, including the European Central Bank - arises from the following facts:

 

The British Treaty of Accession was signed by two agents of the German ‘Black’ Nazi intelligence continuum, DVD -This is the ultra-secret German Nazi continuing ‘Black Operations’ intelligence organisation based, appropriately enough, in Dachau, near Munich.

 

Intelligence concerning the existence was passed to the Editor of International Currency Review: Christopher Story FRSA - Veteran UK financial and intelligence analyst

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org Telephone +44-(0) 20-7222 3836

by

 British intelligence sources

 

The Editor then had its contents checked out by high -level US intelligence contacts, who confirmed the entity’s existence and importance.

 

There remains some uncertainty about what the initials DVD stand for- alternatively Deutsche Versicherungs Dienst [German Insurance Agency] or else Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst [German Defence Agency] - the context here being that DVD is the intelligence [Abwehr] continuum of the

 

NAZI INTERNATIONAL

 

Originally established by the Nazi Abwehr as the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid in 1942.

 

Therefore, in this context, ‘insurance’ would mean ‘insurance’ would mean ‘insuring the continuity of Nazi global hegemony strategy for the controlling

a

Thousand-Year Reich.’

 

While ‘defence’ in this same context would mean ‘defending’ the continuing covert Nazi global hegemony strategy.

 

DVD is not funded by the German Government and Taxpayer, since it operates its own covert sources of giga-finance; but its primary operations and strategy are routinely approved by the German Chancellery.

 

Any official denial of this fact is a lie

 

To continue:

 

The signatories, both - of The British treaty of Accession whom received substantial financial rewards for their ‘co-operation’, were Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon. Together with the late Roy Jenkins, they were recruited by the German Abwehr while studying at Balliol College, Oxford. This intelligence has emerged since the recent death of Sir Edward Heath [Another Traitor amongst many who have been honoured by the Queen with a title]

 

*

THE E.U. TREATIES ARE ROUTINELY PROCURED BY FRAUDULENT MEANS:

 

That is to say, official signatories and senior policymakers/operatives have received substantial corrupt payments, remitted to their secret offshore bank accounts, in exchange for their ‘co-operation’ in pushing through successive E.U. Treaties.

 

The bribery funds are derived from a colossal secret ‘Black Operations’ slush fund account located in Switzerland -the title and size of which is divulged in the REPORT.

 

For instance:

 

$5.0 billion was allocated in 2004 from the secret Swiss slush fund to ‘procure’ the European Constitution Treaty, divided into two branches:

 

1)             $2.5 billion was allocated (and paid out) on completion of the Inter Governmental Conference [IGC], in July/August of 2004, with $100 million allocated for each of the 25 EU’Member States’. The corrupt bribery funds were remitted to the National officials concerned in Euros.

2)              

 

A further $2.5 billion ($100 million for each ‘Member State’) was payable on ratification of the Collective Treaty.

 

 

Given the negative referendum results delivered by the French and Dutch electorates, payment of the second branch has been a matter of understandable tension and contention ever since, not least since such ‘Black’ remittances, which are common place at the intergovernmental level are illegal -and therefore ‘never happened’.

 

 

Intelligence sources have provided International Currency Review with the NAME of the secret Swiss bank account, the vast amount of ‘Black’ money it holds, the amounts allocated for each corrupted EU ‘Member State’, plus the names of three of the most prominent alleged recipients of ‘Black’ payments, together with details of the alleged transactions concerned.

 

[WE DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK BUT THIS REPORT MUST PUT THE PRO-EUROPE FACTION LITERALLY IN A SPIN AND FEAR OF THE OUTCOME WHEN THE CONSPIRACY IS FULLY REVEALED]

 

We have more to follow

 

*

 

EXPOSURES TRIGGERED BY THE DEATH OF

SIR EDWARD HEATH

 

These revelations have become possible following the death of Sir Edward Heath, who was a German agent and asset for six decades - the longest known foreign intelligence penetration in modern history.

 

It is significant that the extensive Obituary of Heath published in the Guardian on 18th July 2005, closed with the cryptic sentence:

 

‘He [Heath] remained determined that he would be vindicated, until close to the end.

 

This referred to the fact that when Heath visited Salzburg in 2003, ostensibly to attend the Music Festival there, the real reason for his visit was that he had been summoned to Dachau, where DVD officers warned him that

British intelligence were intending to confront him with his treachery.

 

It is reported that, on hearing this, Heath literally ‘blew a fuse’: he suffered a pulmonary embolism.

 

A similar fate attended the demise of the late Roy (Lord) Jenkins who suffered a severe heart attack when confronted by intelligence officials with the fact that he was about to be exposed for his long-term treachery against the United Kingdom.

 

Roy Jenkins was one of the most lethal of all long-term German agents operating at the highest levels of the British Government.

 

And

 

-the present allegedly deeply compromised Tony Blair is the late Lord Jenkins’ protégé.

Heath, Rippon and Jenkins were far from being the only long-term. High-level foreign penetrations by the DVD-the successor ‘Black’ (continuing Nazi) intelligence organisation to the Abwehr.

 

In the United States, the Dulles brothers were German agents to this day. Substantial transfers of ‘Black’ Operations’ funds originally controlled by the United States authorities are known to have been transferred into the hands of the German ‘Black’ covert intelligence community. The CIA is belatedly being to some extent purged of operators with ethnic and other loyalties and ties to Germany.

 

TENSIONS

EXIST WITHIN INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES BECAUSE OF THIS PENETRATION

*

 

THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES.

 

Given that

 

(a)   The United Kingdom’s EEC Accession Treaty,

(b)   The Maastricht Treaty of 1992 and

(c)     The (aborted) European Constitution Treaty were among E.U. bilateral and collective Treaties that were procured by corrupt and fraudulent means, Ev

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION IS AN ILLEGAL ORGANISATION.

 

This is because Article 49 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on Treaties, to which Britain and the other EU ‘Member States’ are parties, provides as follows:

‘If a State has been induced to conclude a Treaty by the fraudulent conduct of another negotiating State, that State may invoke the fraud as invalidating its consent to be bound by the Treaty.

 

[* The first tranche of corrupt payments for the European Constitution Treaty was paid out, but the fate of the second tranche, given the negative French and Dutch referenda outcomes, is uncertain - as well as being the subject of vicious secret controversy]

 

According to intelligence sources, earlier EU Collective treaties were likewise procured by fraudulent means.

 

In the British case, UK Membership of the European Union Collective -an illegal organisation which exists to subsume, usurp and collectivise national sovereignty under the enticing cover of ‘co-operation’ (code for collectivisation)-contravenes the 1689 Bill of Rights which remains the LAW of the United Kingdom to this day and which incorporates the following Oath:

 

‘I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority with this Realm’

*

 

WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION

 

In addition to exposing the illegality and illegitimacy of the European Union as a whole, International Currency Review [Volume 30, Number 4] demonstrates, with extensive analysis and documentation, that the European Commission is a criminal organisation.

 

The issue has been prepared in close collaboration with Ashley Mote, -Independent MEP for Southeast England, [www.ashleymote.co.uk] and Continental MEP colleagues. In October 2004, Mr Mote and Marta Andreason, the former Chief Accountant of the European Commission, presented the UK Serious Fraud Office with two large lever-arch files containing voluminous damning information about institutionalised corruption in the EU Commission and related EU structures.

 

NO ACTION WAS TAKEN

 

[Does the stink of corruption in high places prevent the Rule of Law from taking place?]

 

Among the reasons for concluding that the European Union is a criminal organisation, are the following:

 

1)         Because successive Presidents of the European Union preside over the disbursement of the corrupt ‘Black’ ‘facilitation fees’ identified, each successive (six-monthly) President is and has been aware of the corrupt mechanism used to procure the EU’s successive collective Treaties.

2)         The incidence of fraud committed within the EU’s structures is so extensive and routine, that the European Commission has been condemned as openly condoning a ‘culture of corruption’, and presiding over a system of ‘institutional looting’. Scandalised EC whistle blowing officials refer to the European Commission as a ‘festering dustbin of corruption’. In 2004, there were nearly 3,500 cases of EC fraud.

3)         When informed in 2004 that the EC Vice - President-designate, Jacques Barrot, had been convicted for embezzlement of funds, and had withheld this information from the European Commission’s President-designate, Sr. Jose-Manuel Barroso, the new President denied any prior knowledge of this fact, and left Barrot in place.

4)         It is nothing unusual for European Commission officials to be associated with lucrative corrupt ‘side businesses’-often using offshore accounts-from which they benefit financially, consequent upon contracts being awarded to the businesses in which they themselves have a secret pecuniary interest. For instance:

5)         The Sunday Telegraph reported on 25th September -2005 that two EC employees own a Brussels sex hotel, Studio Europe, which rents out rooms for 13 euros an hour. No doubt this location is used for blackmail purposes. The EC officials in question were named as Carmela lo Guidance, an assistant in the EC Budget Directorate-General and George Tizzies a porter in the Directorate-General responsible for employment. This is the latest of innumerable EC scandals to have erupted into the public domain, some of which are examined in the Special Issue [out on Monday 10th October 2005.]

6)         Unhealthy and evidently pervasive masonic links exist between European Commission officials and contractors, resulting in corrupt and unhealthy ‘business relationships’.

7)    The European Commission’s accounting is NOT only shambolic, but also fraudulent. Evidence to this effect is presented, inter alia, by the well-known British forensic accountant Christopher Arkell, FTCA, and by former Chief Accountant of the European Commission, Marta Andreason. She was ‘suspended’ after five months en poste, and then fired, after she questioned the legitimacy of payments that Directorates-General required her to authorise. She asked awkward questions, and was effectively told to ‘shut up and just sign’.

8)    The EC’s accounting irregularities, which are glaring, include the following abuses: When certain accounting modifications were implemented at the end of 2004, the closing balances in 2004 and the opening balances in 2005 were not reconciled- thereby permanently embedding false accounting data for the future. This means that henceforth no European Commission accounts can ever be accurate (not that this has ever been the case).

 

Even though EU ‘Member States’ have been making payments to the Commission for decades to cover the costs of pension liabilities for approximately 39,000 EC employees (as of 2005), the EU ‘Member States’ have simultaneously been charged with the liability of making/guaranteeing the resulting pension payments. Thus pension liabilities appear on both sides of the balance sheet. Proper accounting practice would require a charge to the Income and Expenditure Account of

 

EUR 19.5 billion

 

And a consequent reduction in reserves.

 

The European Commission should have been acquiring a liability for pensions throughout its existence instead of fudging the accounts in this fraudulent and irregular manner.

The European Commission ‘makes’ massive surpluses out of the ‘Member States’ annually, which it covers up

 

Surpluses are supposed according to the EU’s own regulations, to be returned to the ‘Member States’. What happens in practice is that the EC surpluses that have arisen after all accruals have been accounted for, are eliminated by the simple manipulative expedient of providing for potential expenditures not openly through the Income and Expenditure Account, but by means of corrupt adjustments to the Balance Sheet (‘Provisions’).

 

This method of accounting is prohibited by all recognised accounting standards around the world as DISHONEST.

 

Its use by the European Commission represents a clear fraud perpetuated upon ‘Member States’ and their troubled and exploited peoples.

EC accounting records can be changed two or more years in arrears. The amount and the payee, but not the unique identifying number, can be altered, and no record whatsoever of such changes is/has been maintained in the records. This represents an open-ended invitation to scam the system, especially as it is routine for the EC’s Annual Accounts to be adjusted retrospectively.

The huge Eurocracy (or self-interested EU nomenklatura) has perfected subtle mechanisms for ensuring that hardly anything is ever done to stamp out the corruption over which it has presided for decades. These techniques include, but are not confined to the following:

The use of ‘candour’,

which is NOT to be confused with the truth. ‘Candour’ is deployed in order to disarm, mislead, divert and mollify critics, so that any underlying fraud goes undetected.

 

The ‘multiple investigations’ technique

8.2) What happens is that several investigations are ‘opened’ separately. Further internal ‘investigations’ may follow. Some are then ‘closed’, or ‘suspended’, ostensibly ‘pending’ the ‘results’ of other investigations.

The resulting, deliberately contrived, confusion, with successive reports contradicting others, ensures that the corruption trail is buried and lost.

 

Report-writing is used to smother transparency, clarity, and TRUTH, with the sole objective of obfuscating the underlying looting and corruption.

 

8.3) The EC and its structures have at least 3,094 secret ‘working groups’ or committees, all of which are answerable to no-one, and the operations of which are secret.

 

8.4)             The main objective of any EC fraud investigation is to procure that the case is ‘exported’ as quickly as possible to the ‘Member States’ concerned, so that any corruption at the EC centre is consequently hidden from scrutiny.

8.5)             Wherever possible, investigations are kept unresolved until the existing Commission is duly replaced by its successor-when the ‘that was then, this is now’ excuse kicks in.

8.6)             Innumerable other deliberate obstruction methods, identified by International Currency Review with the guidance of Ashley Mote MEP and his colleagues, are routinely employed by the EC and related structures, to maximise the obfuscation of troubling problems.

 

For instance, one external corporation, based in Luxembourg, in which EC officials had an interest, was ostensibly established on 29th February 1989-a date which never even existed, which meant that the entity was ‘invisible’.

 

When a sanitized official report on the entity’s fraudulent activities was presented to the former President of the European Commission, Signor Romano Prodi - that allegedly corrupt Italian ‘machine’ politician- the date was altered to 22nd February 1989.

 

This further illustrated the devious standard European Commission technique of promulgating conflicting information in separate contradictory reports. By this means, controversy is deflected into sterile arguments over the conflicting information-diverting attention from the institutionalised internal looting itself.

 

8.7)             The European Court of Auditors has given an adverse opinion for many years, on 95% of all European Commission Expenditure.

It has never, ever, approved the EC’s accounts.

 

Furthermore evidence has surfaced of fraud in the Court’s own accounts -one of several indications that the Court itself cannot be trusted. Indeed, like the Commission’s own internal Audit Service, its main task, by open official admission, is to minimise embarrassment to the Commission.

 

The damning evidence of institutionalized European Commission looting and serial corruption covered up by the EC authorities contained in the single issue of International Currency Review is sufficient to induce a terminal crisis at the European Commission.

 

*

WHY BRITISH PAYMENTS TO THE EC MUST CEASE FORTHWITH.

 

Both Ashley Mote MEP and the journal’s Editor, Christopher Story, demand that the UK Treasury sits up, finally takes notice, and withholds further contributions to the EC budget pending elimination of institutionalised corruption and looting in the European Commission’s structures -which will never happen.

 

In a letter to Ashley Mote dated 22nd October 2004, Stephen Timms, the Treasury Minister, told the MEP that withholding British payments to the EC would be illegal and would be an ‘option’ we would not consider’

 BUT

Continued squandering of UK Taxpayers (OUR MONEY) represents a dereliction by British Ministers and their officials, of their duty of care towards UK taxpayer’s funds.

Given the conspicuous gravity of the situation, Ministers are believed to be increasing the risk of being sued for negligence as exposures of the European Commission’s ‘culture of corruption’ proliferate.

 

[At this moment in Time in the UK millions of people on tax-credits who were overpaid because of technical problems are being asked to hand the money back. They should ALL insist that the Treasury should try the European Commission and ask their employees to point the finger and explain were the billions of pounds of OUR money is resting in banks in Switzerland. WE should certainly have a great deal of compound interest to collect at the same time]

 

Moreover the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Lawson of Blaby, has advised the House of Lords’ European Committee that the British Government DOES possess the legal scope to give itself powers to withhold payments to the European Commission.

 

He told the Committee:

 

‘You have to remember how hard it was to win the (UK) rebate…It would never have happened if we had not made clear that if we did not get satisfaction, we would withhold our contributions.

It was never published, but it was printed. It was discreetly known to those who we negotiated with, that this is what would happen if we did not get satisfaction….Without that threat to withhold our contributions, to the extent of having the UK law officers produce a bill, we would have NOT got [the Rebate].’

 

[Source: Future Financing of the European Union, House of Lords European Committee, HL Paper 62, 9th March 2005.]

 

But since Britain’s EU membership is illegal, because the UK Accession Treaty and successive EU Collective Treaties (notably Maastricht) were procured by fraud, it is not even technically necessary for the Government to extract that draft bill from the official pigeon-hole into which it was shoved.

*

BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION TOMORROW: NO PROBLEM.

The Government can walk away from the European Union Tomorrow- and use the 25% of gross Domestic Product represented by all current and future costs of the EU membership:

 

To rebuild the Public Transportation system.

 

Build spanking new ‘Schools and Hospitals’ wherever demand exists.

 

And revitalise the BRITISH economy generally.

 

All without suffering any losses since EU membership has brought Britain no clear benefits at all, that could not have been procured domestically. It has however, meant that billions of UK taxpayers’ funds that the British Government should have been spending at home, have been squandered on this sterile, decaying collectivist project, led by corrupted and blackmailed politicians and operatives.

 

All EU ‘Member States’, valuing the huge British market for their goods, would be compelled to negotiate arms’-length bilateral trade and other agreements with the United Kingdom, or risk losing access to UK markets. Any prospective interim disruptions could be accommodated by the British Government directing the UK taxpayers’ funds that it normally squanders with the EC’s ‘festering dustbin of corruption’, into temporarily vulnerable sectors of the UK economy.

 

A Free Trade Agreement linking Britain, the United States and Canada has bee readied, for implementation when Britain leaves the European Community.

 

For, contrary to what is in the public domain, contingency plans do exist in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union.

 

These were recently reviewed and ‘dusted down’, in the context of key connections made by certain intelligence circles following the 7/7 attacks, which have shown that EU Member States’ that profess to be allies of the United Kingdom are anything but.

 

Exposure information for this special issue of International Currency Review

[Vol.30, No4] has been developed with the generous practical assistance of Ashley Mote MEP. Paul van Buitenen MEP, Marta Andreason, Christopher Arkle FTCA and the US and UK intelligence sources special to the Editor, Christopher Story.

 

For further details, see Ashley Mote’s website: www.ashleymote.co.uk.

 

 

International Currency Review, VOL. 30 NO 4 [extracts from 153 pages -shown above], available by subscription from www.worldreports.org. was mailed to paying subscribers worldwide on

 

10th October 2005

 

Banks, Corporations and other entities that use subscription agencies may subscribe to World Reports Ltd serials (complete) through their usual channels, or else direct from our website, or from the London or New York addresses shown in the lower red panel on the

 

www.worldreports.org Home Page. The website has a secure and reliable subscription ordering system.

 

ABOUT INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

 

International Currency Review is the only INDEPENDENT global journal specializing in international currency, financial and economic issues with a geopolitical and intelligence dimension.

 

Published since 1969, it specializes today in exposing corruption in governance structures, since the corruption of governance and of the capitalist system is swamping all other considerations.

 

The Journal is one of a series of intelligence sources published by World Reports, details of which will be found on our website:

 

www.worldreports.org

 

International Currency Review has recently exposed the basis of the ‘Upper Echelon’global financial structure, which sustains the ‘Lower Echelon’ structure with which we are all familiar.

 

The ‘Upper Echelon’ is a ‘closed’ intergovernmental and intelligence financial environment characterised by high -yield investment programmes, scamming operations and colossal stored fiat wealth running into trillions of dollars

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

* * *

OCTOBER 10-2005

 

Also

 

AVAILABLE SOON

 

THE NEW UNDERWORLD ORDER

 

*Published by: EDWARD HARLE LTD

(Source of ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books.

108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, LONDON SW1P 2EF

Orders@edwardharle.com . Tel-Orderline +44 [0207-222-2635

 

*

 

 

 

IN JULY 2016

AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR  PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charchol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2O10

 

H.F.1123 FREEDOM NOW

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 31

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

THE MODERN TOWER OF BABEL

A poster published by the Council of Europe: 

The Tower of Babel is taken from the famous painting by the 16th Century Flemish artist Breughel, showing the well-know scene from the Book of Genesis.  The Bible says that for their arrogant behaviour , God divided and confused the builders of this monstrosity by causing them to babble at each other in different languages.  The choice of this to symbolise 'the building of Europe' shows that, as one would expect, the secular designers of this poster were either ignorant or sceptical of the moral of the Biblical story.

However ,in 1993, shortly after the Author first republished this illustration in one of our intelligence serials, and pointed its irony, the POSTER WAS SUDDENLY WITHDRAWN.    The inverted stars are intended to replicate the 'stars' of the European symbol, which have remained 12 in number - the number of the Apostles, and also the number of stars itemised in Revelation 12, verse 1, which depicts 'a women clothed with the sun...and  upon her head a crown of twelve stars', an image extensively used by the European Union:

The stars mimic the upside-down pentagram used in occult contexts. The expanding EU's retention of 12 stars' and there used upside - down here ( one being obscured), conveys a conscious yet subliminal occultic message. 

 Bernard Connolly, who was the senior Brussels official formally in charge of the European Monetary System, refers in his book

'The Rotten Heart of Europe'

[Faber and Faber, London, 1995]

to 'the sinister motives and back-to-front reasoning' of Euro-ideologues and 'the builders of Europe'. 'Back to-frontness' and upside-downness' are characteristic of EVIL.  No doubt the poster was withdrawn because of fear or superstition that 'the European edifice' may well suffer the same fate as the Tower of Babel.  Since there is no place for GOD in Lenin's 'Common European Home', which the deluded European elites are 'building', this is a certainty. They forget that ' except the Lord build the house, they labour in vain to build it'

[Psalm of Soloman 127, verse 1].

TO BE CONTINUED

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

[Each underlined word/words has a separate bulletin]

JANUARY-2009

More!

A 824
 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/
Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

 YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

 THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

 SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

 HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 
UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

WARNING of OUR MAN in WASHINGTON in 1996-EURO DOOMED TO FAILURE-

 

ONLY a GOLD STRONG GERMANY has PREVENTED the COLLAPSE of

 HITLER'S war-planned EU

 TIME IS RUNNING OUT for FRAU MERKEL as many GERMANS now say WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK-NOW!

 

The main purpose of the EU (Germany) was to encourage mass immigration from opposing cultures to order to destroy any remaining NATIONAL SPIRIT of the member states.

It was an arrogant and complacent move by an out-of-touch ELITE! which decided it knew best and it is now desperate to salvage what it can in order to keep their well-paid jobs and pensions.

Over the past 44 years the EU commision has used its unlimited funds to build up its connections in the member states in order to bribe and with a policy of gradualism to sponsor all manner of developments particularly in England with (propaganda and brainwashing) in schools and colleges, universities and the general viewer by the BBC-the Brussels Broadcasting Corporation-books-leaflets-talks-trips etc. Businessess  and science, trade unions and many others from other areas of society and with many politicians in local and central government looking for rapid promotion particularly in Brussels with their lucrative salary and 

expenses in order to obtain supporters for their Super State ambition. The close result on June 23-2016 showed how successful they were with their many enticements paid for in the main by ENGLAND and the small number of  other major contributors to the EU BUDGET and that is why so many voters in the country put their own selfish interest FIRST with no interest in reclaiming their once

FREE-INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

*

EU expenses: MEPs claim over £1million in five years as Nigel ...

 

 

Searches related to mep salary and expenses

mep salary and expenses 2016

nigel farage mep expenses

mep pension

nigel farage mep salary

mep expenses scandal

mep expenses claims

how many meps in european parliament

mep pension rights

*

101  REASONS WE LEFT THE EU

AND THE

THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE

*

LATEST!

 
DAILY MAIL

 COMMENT

February 14, 2017:

 

THE PRICE FOR STAYING IN-

[THE EU]

Here's a figure George Osborne and his Remainer chums didn't mention during the referendum campaign.

Britain's net contribution to the EU budget is to soar to almost a third by 2019-from

 £7.9 billion a year to £10.2billion.

Doesn't this revelation, slipped out by the TREASURY

show precisely why we're leaving in the nick of time?

Brussels is spending well beyond its means and increasingly expects bigger countries like Britain to foot the bill. Getting out could solve our elderly care crisis at a stroke-and still leave a few billion to spare.

*
Daily Mail

*

Empires have gone and most  people in the world now live in nation states-Lord Peter Shore

2003

*

THE ARDENT EU FANATIC JOHN BERCOW OF TODAY IN FEBRUARY 2017 HAD A CHANGE OF FACE IN 1998.

 

ADDED FEBRUARY 14-2017

 FROM

DAILY MAIL

Ephraim

Hardcastle

COLUMN

 SPEAKER John Bercow who controversially told Reading University students he voted REMAIN, informed scholars at BUCKINGHAM UNIVERSITY in 1998:

'The people of Britain will never knowingly consent to be governed by those who do not speak their language, live in their country or depend yupon their votes. The power of self, the right to hire and fire our rulers and the capacity to chart our vown destiny are inalienable birthrights . They should not be traded in for a mess of pottage otherwise known as a back row seat at a show called

THE HEART OF EUROPE.

Our destiny is surely as a self governing nation which trades freely with the world. The future is bright; the future is global. Our success in it is dependent upon the vision, self confidence and calibre of our leaders, our businesses and our workforce.'

My source there adds: His speech was such a Eurosceptic tour de force that the Bruges Group printed it as a pamphlet.' Fancy!

 

*

'English Freedom is rooted in English nature.'

INDEX - MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

LATEST! IN PART 2-(March 7)

*

APRIL-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

APRIL-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017

 

TONY BLAIR ONE OF THE MOST DISREPUTABLE_DUPLICITOUS AND DISHONEST PRIME MINISTERS IN BRITISH HISTORY

IMPEACH BLAIR FOR MISLEADING US OVER IRAQ WAR-SAYS GENERAL SIR MICHAEL ROSE [2006]

HOW President Blair CORRUPTS EVERYTHING HE TOUCHES

TRAITOR BLAIR PUTS UP TWO FINGERS TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE

WARNING OF OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON IN 1996-EURO DOOMED TO FAILURE

BUSH AND BLAIR START A WAR FOR POWER AND OIL AND TO RESTRICT THE FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE [2006]

ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM

THE DEATH OF POLITICS

A TIME TO MAKE A STAND IS HERE

BLAIR'S THREE WARS DOOMED TO FAILURE

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

BLAIR_GOLDSMITH-SCARLETT AND OTHERS-A CABAL OF TREASON

 ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH