| |
|
|
| |
Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease
Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.
*
A further article from
the ONLY sole INDEPENDENT world-wide respected International
Currency Review under the heading:
*

*
CAN BRITAIN WITHHOLD ITS EC
CONTRIBUTIONS?
PERTINENT LEGAL ADVICE BY LEOLIN
PRICE, QUEEN’S COUNCEL
The following Legal Opinion was provided by the distinguished veteran
constitutional lawyer, Leolin Price QC, in response to a request
to consider the following questions:
1.
) Can ministers of the Crown be held culpable for the misuse of UK
taxpayers’ money (i.e., of UK Government funds) by the European
Commission and/or European Union; and
2.
) Can Britain
withhold its contributions to the EC budget on the ground that
UK taxpayers’ funds are being misused (embezzled, defrauded,
misappropriated, misallocated, misrepresented, etc)? But in
reality, these questions are themselves superfluous since, as
exposed in this issue [of
International
Currency Review-Vol 30,4 dated October 10-2005, cstory@worldreports.org
Britain’s EU membership
was procured fraudulently, so that under the Vienna Convention
on the Law of Treaties (1969), Britain has every
right to leave the EU unilaterally and to cease payment.
1.
I preface this Opinion by acknowledging that I am not aware of any precedent
for the sort of proceedings in court against Ministers of the
Crown, whether civil or criminal, which I am asked to consider.
2.
But there
are two relevant principles of English law to be borne firmly
in mind: first, that the King (or Queen) can do no wrong [We must make it clear at the
outset that this does not include King Tony-whatever he may
think]; secondly, that every subject of the Queen is subject to the RULE OF LAW and equal
before the law. There is no special privilege or status for Ministers or other officers
of the Crown.
They
are vulnerable and ought to be answerable in our courts if something
which they have done is not properly authorised by law, infringes
the rights of individuals and causes damage.
3.There is
also learning about when an officer of the Crown can plead,
as a defence to a claim by someone who has suffered from some
act of that officer, that what was done was an ‘Act of State’.
A British subject cannot sue the Queen (because the ‘Queen can do no
wrong’); and if an act, of which a British subject complains
of, is in civil law, a tort, the officer cannot assert that
the act complained of was an act, which had been authorised
by the Crown (in reality the
Government).
The
Act of State is not available to the officer in that situation. He must, if he can, show that what was done
was a lawful exercise of some power lawfully conferred by
Act
of Parliament
Or
Otherwise:
See, for example,
Johnson v Peglar [1921] 2AC 262.
4.)
But a somewhat different line of modern authority
R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex
p Smedley [1985] AC657 recognises that a person –
in ex p Smedley, a British taxpayer
and elector – may have a ‘sufficient interest’ to bring judicial
review proceedings against Government authorities and Ministers.
·
Can Ministers
of the Crown be held culpable for the misuse of taxpayers’ money
(i.e. of UK Government funds) by the European union?
5.)
This is the first – and primary
– question on which I am asked to advise [Leolin Price, Queen’s Counsel]
6.)
My answer is that our Courts
will not recognise that any direct responsibility is imposed
by Government or the Chancellor of the Exchequer for the subsequent
application, by the Commission of the European Communities Act
or the EU, of our taxpayers’ money which is paid over in accordance
with the established legal procedures for making our contributions
to the European Union.
7.)
But the history and circumstances of fraud, at the centre of the European Union and in ‘Member States’, and the
conspicuous failure of the Commission or the European Union
to establish any proper (and obviously necessary) accountancy
controls over what happens to the money which is provided by
‘Member States’, has produced a situation in which the British
elector and taxpayer may reasonably consider that it is a failure
of duty for the Government, Chancellor of the Chequer and treasury
to go on handing over our money to what he may reasonably consider
is an organisation which is incapable of doing and unwilling
to do, anything effective about the corrupt and fraudulent diversion
of EU funds. The history of
incapacity and unwillingness includes the following:
(1)
The resignation of the whole Commission upon its acknowledgement of collective
responsibility for corruption and fraud.
(2)
In spite of that admission of collective responsibility, the continuation
in office of all but one of the resigned Commissioners.
(3)
A continuing failure to establish a minimum of accounting controls over
the Commission’s expenditure of money at the centre or within
‘Member States’
(4)
Failure by the Commission, in response to acknowledged and massive misuse
of EU money, to establish any regime with a minimum of efficiency
and designed in accordance with modern accountancy standards
to monitor the expenditure of EU money and to minimise its misuse.
(5)
The apparent inability of the Commission to prevent, or reasonably to
combat and control, the corrupt and fraudulent misuse of EU
money, including contributions from the United Kingdom.
8.
Faced with that history,
a UK elector and taxpayer could reasonably expect his Government
to suspend, wholly or partly, the further contribution of money
from the United Kingdom to the European Union in the continuing
absence of proper EU accountancy and controls to combat and
contain fraud and corruption and other misuse of EU money; and
could reasonably expect English Courts to support his claim
for such suspension.
9.
In the circumstances, and
before the next instalment of the UK contribution to the EU
is to be paid, a UK taxpayer could apply for permission to bring
judicial review proceedings challenging the making of the payment
on the ground that no responsible Minister of Department of
OUR Government could regard it as appropriate to pay over money
without any reasonable expectation or even hope that the recipient
EU institutions have made any reasonable arrangements to avoid
its being, with other EU money, misused.
Experience, especially experience since the collective
resignation of the Commission [in 1999], indicates that the
money so contributed will be at serious risk of not being used
for the purposes for which our Treaty obligations and our law
require it to be contributed [sic].
10.
Will such judicial review
proceed -ings be successful? The practical and realistic answer
is that the [English] Courts will be reluctant to permit the review; but there is a presentable
argument, and although there is no previous reported case which
provides a precise precedent, it represents a logical development
of what has been recognised in reported cases; and the continuing scandal
about misuse of EU money provides ground for seriously contending
that judicial review ought to be, and is, available to stop
exposing UK money to the obvious risk of EU failure to avoid
misuse.
11.
The withholding of Treaty-required
contributions, which are at serious risk of not being properly
used for Treaty purposes, is not-or arguably, is not- a breach
of Treaty obligations. [Editor; However as is shown in this issue – of International
Currency Review Vol 30,4 the treaty obligations themselves are not applicable,
since the
British Accession Treaty, and collective treaties, were signed for
corrupt reward by agents of a Foreign Power.]
12.
The argument will be that the Chancellor of the Exchequer,
as a Crown servant, is a guardian of taxpayers’ money and it is a breach of the duties involved in that guardianship to pay
over money which, in the hands of the recipient Commission and
the EU, will be at such serious risk of misuse.
The First defence will be that the payment is required by our Treaty obligations and
by Acts of Parliament; but the answer to that is
that the Treaty obligations and Parliament provide authority
for payment to support Treaty purposes and NOT to expose the money to established
and substantial risk of misuse.
13.
An alternative form of proceedings
might be criminal proceedings against the Chancellor for misuse
of public money under his control.
The argument for this is that the payment is a serious
breach of public duty: it condones and encourages and facilitates
the misuse, and the misuse is foreseeable. Those instructing
me may consider it worthwhile attempting such a criminal case;
and it may be that the launching of such a criminal case will
achieve judicial discussion of the public duty and its breach.
It is, nevertheless, my opinion that such criminal
proceedings will not be successful.
14.
, The better choice of proceedings is judicial review.
19th October 2004.
Leolin Price CBE QC,
10 Old Square,
Lincoln’s Inn,
London.
[Font altered-bolding
& underling used-comments in brackets]
* * *
NOV/05
For more details of Corruption and Skulduggery
and Treachery in the EU and in the United Kingdom before and
since the Second World War.
www.worldreports.org.
E-mail cstory@worldreports.org
And on the EDP bulletin board
Bulletins
308 & 309 which are consistently among our
top essays with viewers since their launch on October 10-2005
in line with the release of the details in the
publication by the respected and Only INDEPENDENT International Currency Review journal which has been in existence since 1969
during which time it has acquired a World-Wide reputation for
uncovering Conspiracies which have blossomed
with their dangerous fruit for well over
60 years, which has infected many of our supposed politicians
in the arts of Treachery-Corruption and Deceit - still to this
day.
Many will say we have heard this all before but what
they fail to realise is that the media –particularly the Press
are owned in the main by individuals who have acquired great
power of influence world-wide and are able to direct events
their way.
So when there are attempts to demolish a conspiracy
theory you can bet that the major players in the press and media
are no doubt involved. What
you have to ask yourself is which side of the argument is most
likely to be believed taking into account what has happened
in Europe and America over the past 60 years.
We are involved in a catastrophic war in Iraq which
we now all know was illegal and that our King Tony was only
too pleased to follow his buddy George Bush and exclaim that
they had now given Democracy to Iraq when in reality a civil
war is now in progress which will lead to the fragmentation
of Iraq into three separate nation States which will go against
the grain with our federalist King Tony so keen on a United
States of Europe who now appears to have trouble with his own
rebels –which we are delighted to witness in a country once
the home of the Mother of Parliaments until New Labour had other
ideas.
* * *
NOV/05
*
|
THE PEOPLE
HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
*
Ditch the EU TREATY after
IRISH REJECTION
SAY
VOTERS
by
Daniel
Martin
Political
Reporter
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June
18,2008]
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain
should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of
its rejection in last week's
IRISH REFERENDUM'
The poll comes as the Tories launch a
last-ditch bid in the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
RATIFICATION
OF THE TREATY.
And
10,000 people
have signed a
PETITION
on the
DOWNING
STREET- WEBSITE
within the past few days
JUNE16-2008
, calling on the
GOVERNMENT
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T
YOU?]
Downing Street
website is
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/
*
JUNE 18-2008
|
*
*
The abolition
of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
The abolition
of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
MPs voted by 362 - 224 for the Reform Treaty in its
Second Reading on Monday 21st January. This sixth and
final treaty, now renamed the Lisbon Treaty, formally
replaces Britain with the European Union on 1st January
2009. This is a year before the deadline set by the
Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel.
The Treaty will abolish the British Constitution, and
therefore the nations of Britain and England, sweeping
away our Westminster Parliament, and giving the EU the
power to close it.
The Treaty sets up an unelected three tier politburo
executive in Brussels with absolute power, a
dictatorship on the soviet model. The EU parliament has
no power and is a sham.
Read the Reform Treaty one page summary on the left.
Gordon Brown was lying: the Treaty is worse than the
constitution.
This sixth treaty is the fastest moving and most
secret the EU has drafted; opposition to and recognition
of the EU as a police state is growing, and they know
speed is vital.
This Commons vote, one of the most important in our
history, was largely unreported by our controlled press
and media.
The Queen and Parliament to complete ratification
this spring, 2008
Parliament has allocated 29 days to discuss this treaty
in February (not much for its own abolition). They will
probably have the final ratification vote in March. The
Queen, the EU's most loyal supporter, plans to give her
Royal Assent in June 2008. This means Westminster and
the Queen will ratify it behind our backs, as they have
the other five treaties.
No referendum
German Chancellor Merkel chose this sixth Treaty instead
of pushing it through as a constitution to avoid
referendums in its member nations. She twice visited 10
Downing Street and forced Gordon Brown to cancel both
his promised referendum, and his General Election.
"Anti-EU" groups have
encouraged us to call for a
referendum precisely because
the EU has already
prohibited it. They know we
are wasting our efforts: our
four party leaderships take
their orders from the EU,
not from the voters.
How to fight
The real course of action is to change the minds of
70 MP's and get a majority against. MP's have been
selected on the Party list system over the last 20 years
to ensure an obediant majority of pro-EU MPs.
These MPs now need to understand the EU has the
constitution (the six treaties) of a dictatorship, the
laws of a police state, and when enforced, its 111,000
regulations will create a government command economy,
soviet style: dictatorships cause poverty.
They also need to realise that MPs are the people who
put this dictatorship in power. If they put it in power,
they are the greatest threat to take it out of power.
All dictatorships in the past have eliminated that
threat. Inside the EU, the lives of MPs will be even
worse than our own; at best, they are likely to be
institutionalised and held against their will. (This is
the only good bit - these hated traitors will suffer
severely.)
Visit your MP in his surgery NOW and explain this.
(Instructions top left)
The EU remains illegal
Each of these six treaties are completely illegal under
the British Constitution, our 1689 Bill of Rights, our
treason laws, and under our common law. It is
unforgivable that the Queen, her Ministers and our
Parliament have committed the criminal act of treason by
signing these treaties, and broken our laws to abolish
our nation.
The EU will always be
illegal in Britain; but once
the EU has complete power
and control here, we can no
more get rid of it than we
could Germany, had their
planned illegal occupation
of Britain in 1940 been
successful.
The Countdown to abolition
Whereas the 465 page EU Constitution would have
abolished the five treaties and replaced them with a
single document conferring absolute power, the Reform
Treaty adds to the existing five treaties, bringing them
up to the powers of the EU Constitution. All six
treaties with appendices add up to nearly 10,000 complex
and unreadable pages. Tony Blair agreed to it on 23rd
June 2007 as his final stab in Britain’s back. On the
23rd July there was an Intergovernmental Conference
(IGC), when we should have seen a first draft of the
Treaty.
Foreign ministers agreed its terms on 7-8th September
at the resort of Viana de Castelo, Portugal. There was a
summit in Lisbon on the 18th and 19th October, where
they hoped to sign the Treaty, but Gordon Brown signed
it on December 13th 2007, commiting treason, the most
criminal act on the statute book.
The EU has decided to act now as if the Treaty were
already in force; they are consolidating their power
each day. On 1.1.2009 the Reform Treaty and the other
five seize all remaining power from our Westminster
Parliament, which becomes defunct on that day; it has no
remaining powers whatsoever. (The Treaties do allow
Brussels to return minor powers, but that is very
unlikely.) On 11th June 2009 we have bogus elections to
the sham Brussels Parliament, the only elections we will
get in the future.
Westminster's five year term expires on 5th May 2010
and a British General Election is due. The six treaties
make no provision for an election to our Parliament. By
that time the EU will have consolidated its absolute
power, and it will almost certainly use it cancel that
election and to close Westminster. The EU has always
planned to rule what was Britain directly through its 12
nominated Regional capitals, by passing Westminster,
from which every function will be removed.
Its founders knew the EU dictatorship cannot be built
while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on
its doorstep. They tried twice before in 1914 and 1939.
Britian has to be utterly destroyed for the EU to
succeed. The success of the EU's Frankfurt School
subversion techniques on Britain (see left) has been
astonishing; the abolition of Westminster is one of
their final remaining goals.
You have 11 months left
Treason is the most serious of all Britain’s crimes. You
have just 11 months left to bring these vile British
traitors to justice, and get us out of the EU
dictatorship.
Around 45 million British
people are against the
abolition of our nation, and
with the little European
voting that has been
allowed, it seems clear over
200 million of its victims
don’t want the EU. But we
will never be given the
choice. YOU have to decide
to act yourself.
There are ways to stop the EU - see "Your Campaigns"
on the left. Then we will need a mass blockade of
Westminster to stop our criminal MP's and Queen breaking
our constitution and laws for the last time.
Copy of the EU's Timetable at the BBC.
Original 2009 article from German Parliament -.pdf for
download
Then check it at the German Parliament
here
|
Campaigns: Print these .pdf's: One or two
pages each.

Your
Campaigns

Ten EU
truths

Reform
Treaty one page

50 reasons
to leave

EUtruth flier

Common Purpose

Abolition of
Councillors

Abolition
of 48 Counties

Map: the 9
EU regions

Transnational
regions


Reform
Treaty full text

EU
Constitution, one page pdf
EU
Constitution: one page html

Signs
of EU police state

The EU's degraded our
lives

What will the EU be like?

List of
British traitors

Beef up the British Constitution

Lib Lab Con: One Party State

The Queen

The EU's Hitler

The EU costs
£200 billion pa

The
dictatorship: Quotes

UK > EU
handover of power.

EU
subversion diagram.

Subversion: Common
Purpose

Frankfurt
subversion.

The terrorism
deception

Abolition of
our 48 counties

Abolition of
Parliament.

Church
flier

Some
revolutionary lyrics

drjn.co.uk - copy of this site

The Westminster
News

The
Devonport Column

The Cornish Free
Press

The British Free
Press

Government
disinformation


Mobilisation
talk

Blueprint
to get out

SS child
snatching

Wood's rigged
elections

Stood for the
leadership
| Where we are
now:
1. Since 1972 The Queen has
illegally signed five of the six EU
Treaties.
2. The five treaties define and build the EU
as an unelected dictatorship.
3. The EU's laws, passed by Westminster, give
it the powers of a police state.
4. The sixth EU treaty will complete the
abolition of Britain as a nation
- the Queen is due to sign it this year.
A foreign power, the EU, will then rule us,
and enforce the laws of a police state.
Shouldn't we repeal the 1972 European
Communities Act now
before we are imprisoned permanently inside?
We've only got till July 2008.
Please fight the campaigns
at the top of the menu on the left.
The
leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib
Dem parties have been controlled by the European
Union for two decades. It is the EU agenda they
implement in Parliament, not your wishes, which
is why your vote doesn't count.
Our controlled press and media haven't
reported it, but Britain would have been
abolished in November 2006 if the French and
Dutch hadn't voted down the EU Constitution.
Instead a sixth and final Treaty will now be
signed; after which EU Commissioners will have
the power to impose the Constitution (and the
Euro) on us, and enforce the laws of a police
state.
5. Thirty three years inside the EU - have
you noticed how our democracy is being
withdrawn?
The EU has already denied us that most basic of
human rights - the right to vote against the EU
and to keep our own nation. A majority of us
don't want to be in the EU. We are being forced
in against our will.
Do you feel you've become powerless, unable
to influence events, or your vote is worth less?
The six treaties have been gradually removing
our democracy; for thirty years our laws have
been "harmonised" with the EU; 80% of the laws
now passed by our Parliament are EU laws, not
ours. Isn't the real reason people have lost
interest in politics precisely because the EU
has taken away our ability to change things?
Common law, where the government was our
servant, is now largely replaced by the EU's
Corpus Juris, which puts the government above
the law, and we don't participate. We have
already lost most of our rights (including
habeas corpus). The power of government grows
unchecked, as does that of large corporations.
Politicians continuously lie about the EU,
pretending its not significant.
6. Massive EU corruption
The EU's auditors have found the fraud is so
widespread they've refused to sign off the EU's
accounts for each of the last ten years.
Whistleblowers like Marta Andreason, the EU
Budget Director, who in 2005 found the EU
couldn't account for 95% of its £66
billion budget, are simply fired for telling the
truth.
7.The bribing of our Politicians by the EU
Europe works by bribing politicians with huge
salaries and expenses to vote for Europe,
against the best interests of their own voters.
As a result all three parties are in favour
of the EU - Westminster acts like a one party
state of politicians: the Lib-Lab-Con. The
parties are run top down and implement the
policy of their leaderships, not that of their
members. (unfortunately UKIP is run in the same
way). If you have voted for the Labs, Cons or
Lib-Dems since 1969, you have voted
for the EU dictatorship.
8. EU corruption is now exploding through
our Civil Service, our local government, and our
7,000 quangos.
A shadow EU government lives inside our
bureaucracy, headquartered in the Office of the
Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM.) It includes many
parts of government including the RDA and the
Regional Assemblies. Common Purpose, an
EU organisation, the UK branch also
headquartered in the ODPM, has members across
many government organisations including some
city and county councils, the Land Registry, the
police and the NHS, which it is destroying from
within.
Common Purpose is the glue that
enables fraud to be committed across these
government departments, most of it lining the
pockets of politicians and bureaucrats. It often
involves the sale of public assets such as land
to friends of politicians or their businesses.
(The RDA -The EU Regional Development Agency, is
a major player in this type of fraud.) And the
handing out of plum government non jobs with big
salaries and expenses to members of Common
Purpose, all of it involving the theft of our
money as taxpayers. The Chief Executive Officer
of Common Purpose is Julia Middleton of the
ODPM.
9. Businesses closing under EU regulation
The EU's 111,000 regulations, when fully
enforced, will transform Britain from a free
market economy into a Soviet style command
economy, closing hundreds of thousands more
businesses. They will also control our personal
lives far more closely than were those of Soviet
citizens. (In a Parliamentary answer to Lord
Stoddart in January 2003, the government
admitted there were 101,811 EU regulations,
growing at 3,500 pa).
The cost of Britain's 8,500 quangoes is £124
billion a year, and they raise an additional £40
billion from us in charges, according to the
Cabinet Office. The Public Bodies Directory 2006
describes only 882 of them. Most exist to
enforce EU regulations; nearly all should be
closed.
10. The EU costs us £200 billion pa, 20%
of our economy
According to the government's Better Regulation
Task Force Annual Report 2005 (Introduction
written by Tony Blair,) complying with EU
regulations now costs our economy over £100
billion a year.
By far the largest treasury expense is now
the £167 billion spent on the EU's 8,500
quangos, (Cabinet Office figures) most of which
enforce EU regulation. This is patronage,
bribery, putting thousands of officials and
influential businessment on £100,000 - £300,000
a year salaries. That's why the Exchequer is so
desperate for cash and can't pay for the navy,
nurses, students etc.
Economists say we lose £80 billion pa by
associating with the EU's inferior economies.
The EU took our fishing industry, which costs us
£5 billion pa. EU damage to other industries
(like forcing us to close the Rover Car Co) a
further £20 billion. Our EU contribution is a
relatively minor £10 billion, the only bit the
Press discuss.
Before we joined the EU we had an even
balance of trade with them. Now EU regulations
have fixed it so we lose £30 billion year
trading with the EU on our balance of payments.
We'd be enormously more wealthy if we left.
The main use of taxes is now to finance
government and its greedy whirlpool of waste;
they've doubled in real terms in the 33 years
we've been in the EU. There's less money in the
economy left for wages, creating a growing
underclass who can't make ends meet.
11. Our counties to be abolished
The Queen signed the 1992 Maastricht Treaty,
which adopts the EU Regionalisation Plan. This
will abolish England's 48 counties and replace
them with 9 European regions, each with their
own Regional Capital, which reports directly to
Brussels, not to Westminster. This effectively
obliterates the country of England. For example
the County of Cornwall is replaced by the South
West Region, which stretches from Lands End and
includes Gloucestershire and Wiltshire; its
regional capital is Exeter. As this move is
unpopular it is being kept low-key and will not
be implemented until the sixth treaty is signed,
when we lose our right to object.
12. The deliberate destruction of our
standards and way of life,
From Sunday trading, where large stores force
staff to work Sundays for derisory pay - or they
don't get a job, to the deliberate undermining
of the family and teachers, to sex education for
the under 13's, to children being given obscene
homework, its all traceable via our compliant
government back to the EU over the last 34
years, as it sucessfully implemented the
subversion of the Frankfurt School. While inside
atheist Europe, British Christianity has almost
died out; safety on our streets and a great
chunk of civilised life has left with it.
13. The EU has controlled our immigration
since 1997
In January 2007 on the front page of The
Westminster News we forecast 1.5 million
immigrants for the year, and people laughed at
us. On January 24th 2008 the Daily Express
published government figures of 1.3 million
Polish immigrants alone for 2007. With Romania
and Hungary joining in that year the total was
probaly double that. The Amsterdam Treaty handed
control of our immigration to the EU. 30,000 a
year used to arrive - the EU's increased it by
60 times That's why house prices have
been screaming up, even though the population of
original British people is falling.
Politicians and huge corporations like
immigration - with thousands of immigrants
available on low pay, they can impose the
minimum wage on millions. Politicians then lie
that they can't get British workers to do dirty
jobs. The truth is they won't offer a decent
wage, and cynically use immigrants to drive
wages down, adding to the huge underclass.
The Government pretends there are a maximum
of 145,000 immigants annually, and 1.5 million
new houses will be needed to house them. But
then Jack Straw admits that 2.6 million
immigrants applied to stay here last year.
Our infrastructure and services can't stand
such huge numbers and is breaking down in some
cities, where English people are becoming a 10%
minority. But the EU controls it, not the
Foreign secretary, and he has no power, no
options but to do as EU policy dictates, and
accept it.
Michael Howard was lying on the 24th January
2005 when he said he'd fix immigration - as
Prime Minister, he'd have had no control over it
whatsoever. Immigration hurts our existing
immigrants first - new immigrants move into
their areas, decreasing the wages and increasing
the pressure on housing.
If the sixth Treaty is signed, we lose
our right to withdraw and Britain ceases to be a
nation. Like the other six, it only requires two
signatures: the Prime Ministers, and the Queen's |
|
| Examples of
how our lives have degraded since we've
been in the EU:
In the EU, (which means in
Britain) government is above the law.
The EU's corpus juris now pervades right
through our legal system. A policeman
was let off by magistrates this year
(2005) for driving his private car at
159 mph in Ludlow, Shrops. Under Corpus
Juris the government are above the law
and cannot be prosecuted The judge ruled
correctly under EU law. 45,000 police
officers got off speed cameras in this
way in 2004, although their speeding
killed 44 innocent people. (Daily Mail
27.12.05.)
EU "monitoring Officers" have the
right to dismiss our Councillors.
The Local Government Act of 2000
empowered the head of the EU government
in England, the Office of the Deputy
Prime Minster (ODPM) to appoint a
monitoring officer to spy on every
council. If an elected councillor
disagrees with the EU or government
line, the unelected "Standards Board for
England" can suspend him for up to five
years. An example is in Cambridgeshire,
where the ODPM has threatened cllr Alex
Riley with suspension if he attends any
debate discussing the ODPM's plans to
build a new town of 20,000 people called
Nothstowe on his ward. The ODPM has the
conflict of interest here; but its
powers are becoming absolute.
We have lost the right to freedom
The EU arrest warrant (signed by the
Queen on 18th November 2003) allows us
to be arrested without charge and held
indefinitely with no right to see a
solicitor, make a phone call, or even a
right to a trial. You can simply
disappear.
Under the Serious Organised Crime and
Police Act (SOCPA) 2005, we can now be
arrested and held in the cells by any
police officer for any petty offence,
like dropping litter. Before it had to
be an offense that carried a 5 year jail
term. This also applies to all of the
EU's 107,000 regulations. Do you know
them all?
The Civil Contingences Act 2004
allows government to confiscate anything
you possess permanently; you have no
right to object. This includes your
house. It also gives government the
right to forceably move its population
around to different locations; you can
be left with no place to call your own
and live like a refugee. The only check
and balance here is a Minister just
needs to utter the words "This is a
national emergency." If a demonstration
or strike government doesn't like is
being organised, they can cut off all
communications in a town - phones,
mobiles, the internet, TV, and block all
access to that town including closing
roads and railways. It has all the
powers and more of Hitler's Enabling Act
of 1933.
We have lost the right to free
speech
At the Labour Party conference the
police held an 82 year old man, Walter
Woolfgang, and denied him access to the
conference under the EU's "anti
terrorist" legislation because he had
shouted the word "nonsense" at Jack
Straw, who was speaking about Iraq.
Terrified the true nature of the laws
they have passed on behalf of the EU was
escaping too early, the Labour Party
stopped the police and begged the man to
return to conference.
On October 25th 2005 Miss Maya Evans
was arrested under the Serious Organised
Crime and Police Act 2005, for a lone
protest at the Cenotaph by reading out
the names of the 97 British soldiers
killed in the Iraq war. She was arrested
by no less than 14 police officers and
found guilty at Bow Street Magistrates
Court on the 8th December 2005.
Would you hand over our nation, to be
ruled by a foreign power, with
oppressive laws like these, ? That's
what's happening.
We have lost the right to protest
These laws make protest very difficult;
if we did hold a General Strike and
blockade Westminster it would now
require some bravery: the powers the EU
has demanded from our government enable
it to respond in a way similar to the
Chinese government's in Tiaanamen Square
should it so wish.
It is no coincidence that since 2004,
all MP's offices in Westminster are
guarded by police with machine guns,
inside and out.
The Governments "terrorism"
deception
All these new EU laws, including massive
"anti terrorism" acts (recently 2000,
2001, 2005) were passed with the
pretence they were only directed at
terrorists, or in the case of Asbos,
ruffians who terrorise the streets. In
each case they are used far more often
against ordinary law abiding people,
particularly to suppress dissent. (91%
of those detained under Terrorism Acts
are innocent and have been improperly
arrested. Most of the remainder are
charged with offences that have nothing
to do with terrorism, but cover up over
zealous arrests).
We have lost the right to life
Under EU law the "Shoot to kill" policy
did not need democratic authorisation.
Just two senior police officers
authorised the police to kill British
people. A democratic vote by Parliament
was not required, but even that would
not have legalised the killing under
British common law. A recent victim was
an innocent Brazilian, Jean de Menezes,
shot dead in Stockwell underground
station, even though he was being held
down by police officers at the time of
the execution. The police used dum-dum
bullets, outlawed under the Geneva
Convention because they blow a man to
pieces inside.
The police can no longer be convicted
for killing innocent people - Philip
Prout shot at Lewannick in East Cornwall
is just one of 30 people shot dead by
police since 1992 when corpus juris
crept in. At least one was shot in the
back; most were no threat to anyone. Not
once since 1992 has a policeman been
convicted of any crime for these
murders.
Have you noticed this growing
police state?
In addition to many more laws than those
above, add the 107,000 regulations, and
whole bureaucracies such as VOSA
building up networks of cameras and
databases to record our movements and
criminalise us when we can't comply.
Persecution is no longer confined to
motorists; under EU Corpus Juris our
courts have become extensions of
government power instead of independent
arbiters of justice.
Westminster had passed sufficient of
the EU's oppressive laws (the
"harmonisation" in the Treaties) by the
end of 2004 that we have been living in
what is legally a police state since
then. But at the moment, its only one
per cent enforced. After the Queen signs
the sixth Treaty, the EU has the
absolute power to enforce 100% of its
regulations and laws.
|
|
|
| On the basis of the laws and
treaties already signed by our Queen and
Prime Ministers,
What will
life be like in the EU after
the 6th Treaty is signed?
Our Westminster Parliament immediately
becomes pointess as its remaining powers
are transferred to Europe.
It is the formal end of Britain and
England as nations.
Britain's 153 embassies around the
world will be closed as the ink from the
Queen's signature dries. (As Tony Blair
refused to admit this has been agreed
to, Jose Zapatero, the Prime Minister of
Spain, confirmed it in a February 2005
radio broadcast.)
After the EU abolishes our 48
counties your address will change from 4
High St, Taunton, Somerset, Great
Britain, to 4 High St, Taunton, Area K,
European Union. (The glorious EU county
"The South West Region" has had the
postal address "Area K" assigned for
over a decade.)
The Official National Anthem of the
EU, which you should have known since
1971 is based on the melody "Ode to Joy"
by Beethoven, formally replaces God save
the Queen. The EU flag replaces the
Union Jack, the red, blue and white
nautical ensigns etc. (The EU Commission
has already ordered (24.11.2005) our
Merchant Navy to fly the EU flag in
place of the red Ensign.)
The EU takes ownership and command of
our Police, Army, Royal Navy, RAF,
nuclear weapons, currency reserves,
North Sea Oil. (See the EU Constitution
below)
Serving officers in our police, army,
navy and air force already know they
will have to take an oath to the EU
instead of to the Queen. If they don't
many have been told they will be
dismissed. The EU will have complete
military control of the UK.
The UK Independence Party will be
banned under the 1999 ruling of the
European court of Justice case c274/99,
where it was held that it is illegal to
criticise the EU.
The Conservative, Labour and Lib-dem
parties will be abolished (only pan EU
parties like the EPP or PES are allowed
-see clause I.46.4 of the EU
Constitution). It will then be
blindingly obvious to even the dumbest
politician there is no reason to keep
Westmister open, and that the EU has the
legal right to close it.
Many people will be excluded from the
jobs they know best, as the EU's demand
that you must pay to be re-taught the
job, and pay for a certificate before
you can be employed, becomes universal.
Hundreds of thousands more small
businesses will close on the enforcement
of the remaining 100,000 EU regulations
our government has already passed.
Several million will be permanently
unemployed as a result.
We will all be criminalised by the
107,000 regulations. Its impossible to
know or understand 107,000 regulations,
and the poor can't possibly afford to
comply. We will all be subject to
frequent fines and arrest as a result.
Here are just 4 examples:
Under EU regulations it is now
illegal for you to repair your plumbing,
electrics or your car (from 1st January
2006). If you buy a boat over six feet
long, built after the EU Recreational
Craft Directive of 1999, and don't pay
the EU £4,000 to "measure" the boat, you
get 6 months imprisonment. We will live
under permanent threat of arrest and
fear of the knock at the door that takes
us away.
Massive corporations will do well,
but with huge immigration allowed from
the EU, they'll be able to pay minimum
wage everywhere, not just in the
provinces as they do now. If you don't
accept the minimum they'll employ a Pole
or a Czekoslovakian.
Big corporations will also have a
near monopoly (with the government) on
employment and will be able to dictate
unfavourable terms to staff without fear
of contradiction.
Plum government jobs and corruption
will ensure the wealth of politicians,
bureaucrats, their businesses and
associates at all levels of government,
including local government and amongst
our 7000+ quangos.
Society will divide into two: the
remaining 60% of us will be either
unemployed or treated abysmally on
minimum wage.
Taxes will rise more steeply to pay
for the even larger explosion in
government growth and corruption
There will be no redress through
local democracy because there won't be
any. The nine UK regional governments,
which replace our 48 counties and
councillors, will be unelected (see the
European Regionisation plan). Our only
vote is to the powerless EU parliament.
We will be ruled by the 25 unelected
Commisssioners, and have have no redress
at any level; we will be as poor but
have less freedom than Soviet Citizens.
If we demonstrate or protest we can
be be seized and relocated to another
region. The EU Arrest Warrant and Civil
Contingencies Act 2004, with 20 other
oppressive Acts the Queen has signed
between 1972 and 2005, give the
government absolute power over us. They
can shoot us if they wish with no legal
comeback - the shootings of innocents
Philip Prout and Jean de Menezes were
entirely legal under EU law.
The tendancy to pick on Muslims, as
Germany used to pick on Jews, has
already begun. Europe will be a very
nasty place.
How long will the EU last?
Eventually, perhaps 15 years down the
track, Europe will collapse under the
weight of its own corruption,
bureaucracy, and regulations. There will
be so few productive businesses that
even at 100% tax rates we will not be
able to support the massive, corrupt and
wasteful government. Many of us will be
starving in the lead up to the collapse.
After the collapse we may be able to
leave the EU, if a dictator has not
taken advantage of the complete absence
of democratic checks and balances by
seizing power. The Constitution of the
EU is similar to the Soviet Union's.
That dictator is free to choose between
a Soviet or Nazi style government. Then
it could take 70 years to break free.
|
|
|
|
.
Fifty years ago our greatest threat might have
been violence or mugging. Now the greatest
threat to our economic well being, our way of
life, our freedom and the very existence of our
nation, is our own government.
|
|
| What do we
want?
After the repeal of the EU treaties
we want a change to our British
Constitution so politicians can never
hijack our nation again. Every
Parliamentary Bill, after its Second
Reading, should come down to us, the
people, to vote yes or no as to whether
the Queen should give it Royal Assent.
This will take power away from our
destructive politicians and return it to
the people, where it belongs. (They do
this in Swtizerland - they, not us, are
the most democratic nation on earth.) We
can then return to being a peaceable,
just, honest, prosperous and fully
democratic society where everyone's
rights, no matter how high or low are
respected, and the disadvantaged
properly looked after. And where neither
governments, corporations nor
individuals have obscene wealth and
power.
David Noakes 07974 437 097 ;
drjnoakes@yahoo.co.uk
Campaign to repeal the 1972
European Communities Act and get clean
out.
What can you do to help?
1. Find out when your local MP holds
their surgery and attend with a printout
of this, and the one page summary of the
EU constitution below. Ask that MP to
cross the floor to be the leader of the
first Anti EU Parliamentary Party
(representing 65% of our nation). The
publicity would be stunning, and might
force an in/out vote.
2. Make appointments with your local
journalists, give them the same two
print outs and ask them to write about
the truth about the EU.
3. Do you know anyone famous? Persuade
them in the same way to join our cause
and get the truth known.
4. Print little stickers: "We didn't
vote for this - it has no mandate," and
stick them on everything that represents
the police state and rip off government.
5. Tell your Town, District and County
councillors they are about to be
abolished. See below.
6. Do anything you can to get the truth
about the EU published.
Or print and hand out this
flier (a .pdf), or
flier (as a word document). It
can be photocopied double sided on to
one page.
.
|
Our Councillors abolished
Our 20,000 Councillors will be permanently
abolished after the EU Regionalisation Plan has
established the nine EU Regions. Point out they
were elected to serve the public, not the
government, and the public has not agreed to
their abolition.
Try to persuade them to stand up for the people
who voted for them, (which is only doing their
duty) by holding a yes/no local ballot on
whether the public agree with the abolition of
our counties, councillors and nation.
If the public vote no, they should declare,
for their Town or county, UDI from Europe and
the illegal actions of our government since
1971, particularly the abolition of our British
Constiution, common law, our nation and
counties. The press coverage this would generate
would force the truth into the open nationally,
leading to a national in/out ballot on the EU.
Just one council could achieve this fabulous
result alone.
Download:
A summary of the loss of our 48 counties (a WP
file)
Download:
A map of the nine EU regions (.pdf)
The Devonport Column, exposing Common Purpose
nationally, and corruption in Plymouth.
The six treaties are:
1. The European Communities Act 1972.
2. The Single European Act, 1986.
3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992.
4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997.
5. The Nice Treaty 2001.
The sixth will be called something equally
innocuous, like the Treaty of Lille. Then the
loss of our nation, way of life and freedom will
be complete.
The best summary of the
six treaties is the Constitution
It reveals the
true nature of the EU. Some British politicians
were horrified when they saw the EU's absolute
power revealed in its new constitution, and
falsely accused the EU of much more than a
tidying up exercise. It wasn't, it was a
re-statement of the 6 treaties in almost
readable English. Our politicians simply hadn't
read the six treaties before they voted for
them. The French and Dutch "No" votes are being
ignored as usual; the EU Constitution is 2/3rds
implemented and still being implemented. Dan
Hannan of the Brussels EU Constitutional
Committee, confirms it will be fully implemended
in two years. Brussels can enforce it fully
after the Queen signs the sixth EU treaty.
Here's a one page summary with Article numbers:
One page summary of the Constitution
- pdf for download
UKIP is way understating the costs of the EU.
Even the British and EU governments admit to
four times the UKIP figure.
The EU is costing us 200 billion pa, 20% of our
economy
Quotes from our leaders revealing they know they
built the EU as a dictatorship.
EU treaties and publications abolishing our 48
counties
The Conservative Con trick
Many people have been fooled by the Conservative
Party into believing the party is anti EU. It
was the Conservatives, under Ted Heath, who took
us in to the EU, and then he lied that his 1972
EU Treaty wouldn't affect our sovereignty. Three
out of the four Prime Ministers who signed the 6
EU treaties were Conservatives, every one af
them legally a traitor under the British laws of
their time. Do you see a pattern here?
In 2005 Party Leader Michael Howard could
have won the election for the Conservatives by
making one simple statement: "We will repeal the
1972 EU Communities Act and leave Europe".
Millions of Conservative voters would have
rejoined the fold. A million Lib-Dems and Labour
voters would have joined him. But he didn't.
Because the Conservative leadership would
rather be in Europe than be in power.
Instead Howard continued betraying
Conservative voters, so he lost. (And to be
fair, why should Conservative leaders miss out
on the EU corruption gravy train?)
The Conservative leadership is completely
dedicated to joining Europe, none more so than
David Cameron, who is using the language and
methods of Common Purpose against the
Conservative Party.
Conservative policy is to reform the EU from
the inside (renegotiation). We've been in it 34
years and failed to refom this dictatorship one
jot. Their policy is to continue this complete
failure, and they know this pretence is wholly
dishonest. You either submit to 100% of the EU
or don't join it at all; that is the only choice
open to us.
Half a cheer for the Lib-Dems
They realise we're now living in what is legally
a police state, and speak out against it. We've
been forced to harmonise our laws with the EU
during the 34 years we've been inside, and the
police state we're living in is the EU's. The
Lib-Dems tell us with stunning naivity its
Labour's police state, don't seem to realise the
EU is behind it, and are still madly in favour
of the EU. Its no comfort that they will suffer
for their stupidity. Lately some Lib-Dem MP's
have been talking about the Tories pathetic
"reform the EU" idea. Will they never learn?
With the Labour and Lib-Dem parties openly
for Europe, and the Conservative leadership
secretly for it, its clear the three parties
will never give us a vote to leave the EU and
keep our nation. Massive civil disobedience, a
permanent General Strike, or a blockade of
Westminster until MP's resign might be
effective.
The abolition of the Labour, Conservative
and Lib-Dem parties.
So sloppy have our politicians been in their
reading of the EU treaties, most haven't noticed
| | | |