MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
     
     
 

 

NOR SHALL MY SWORD - THE REINVENTION OF ENGLAND

 

*

HOW President Blair - CORRUPTS EVERYTHING HE TOUCHES.

 

*

Daily Mail

Saturday, April 30, 2005

 

By

 

SIMON HEFFER

 

*

 

[We have included this essay on our bulletin board because there are but few accomplished masters of the English History and its Ancient Constitution and what it means to be an ENGLISHMAN as many of his past articles have testified.

 

Though Mr Simon Heffer is no longer at his former post but has returned to offering his great contribution to the Daily Telegraph and we shall be viewing his Column with our accustomed interest.]

 

 

*

 

When Labour came to power in 1997 they inherited a

SYSTEM of GOVERNMENT

that has evolved over centuries to create one of the most stable and peaceful democracies on Earth.

 

THIS WAS NOT LEAST BECAUSE OF THE

 

CHECKS AND BALANCES

 

OF

 

OUR

 

CONSTITUTION

 

THAT PREVENTED ABUSES OF POWER.

 

Eight years later, those safeguards are in ruins. And the Prime Minister’s treatment of the advice of the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, about the legality of the Iraq war proves just how corrupted our system has become.

 

We are supposed to have a Prime Minister who ‘is first among equals’. We are supposed to have a system in which the Cabinet takes decisions collectively - and if it does not agree with the Prime Minister, then HE must change his view and RESIGN.

 

However such democratic niceties irritate a Prime Minister who prefers to think of himself as a PRESIDENT.

 

The Conventions and Institutions that once protected our liberties from an over-mighty HEAD of Government have been wreaked, not least because of Mr Blair’s knack of corrupting and soiling every pillar of the

 

CONSTITUTION

 

- he encounters.

 

Cabinet Government was the first casualty of his premiership. Ministers were appointed either because they were cronies, or because (like John Prescott) they had a constituency within the party that had to be represented at the top table.

 

Having reached the Cabinet they were then routinely ignored in meetings that became shorter and shorter.

 

Mr Blair has preferred to govern using a coterie of unelected advisers - such as his political secretary Baroness Morgan, his Chief of Staff Jonathan Powell and his former Press Secretary, Alistair Campbell. And instead of their discussions being minuted for the record, they are of an informal, ‘sofa’ nature.

 

The Cabinet never saw the Attorney’s original advice on Iraq of March 7, 2003.

This was either because Mr Blair has such contempt for his colleagues that he felt they had no right to be consulted, or because he feared they might prevent him taking us to war.

 

Some Ministers, notably Robin Cook, behaved honourably when they were by-passed, and resigned.

 

*

[The great and sad loss of Mr Robin Cook since this essay was written in April of this year- who was one of a select band of Honourable members of conscience and principle remaining in the Commons.]

*

 

But the vast majority sat tight.

 

In the age of the professional politician, Ministers would rather follow the call of a high salary, further promotion and, in the end, a place in the House of Lords than the call of their conscience.

 

The reputation of the Attorney-General is now in shreds among the very people whose respect for him is crucial: the Bar and the judiciary.

 

YET he has, so far, seen no cause to resign over how he was persuaded to change his advice to the Government between March 7 when he said there might be legal considerations affecting our participation in the Iraq war, and March 17, when he said there were none.

 

When the credibility of the Attorney -General is compromised in this way, the whole legal profession is damaged.

 

The failure to show the original advice to the Cabinet breached the

 

Code of Ministerial Conduct

 

One of the main enforcers of the CODE is the HEAD of the Permanent Civil Service, the Cabinet Secretary Sir Andrew Turnbull.

 

 

Sir Andrew, like his predecessor Sir Richard (now Lord) Wilson, has presided over a ruinous politicisation of the Civil Service, which has helped end the culture of wise objective advice that existed not just to help Ministers govern properly,

 

BUT

 

to protect the Public from

 

EXCESSES

 

The Civil Service is now of lower calibre than at any time since competitive examination was introduced for entrants to it 150 years ago. Its morale is low. It is no longer an attractive career prospect for high-grade graduates.

 

Civil servants are now routinely blamed for decisions that are the responsibility of Ministers. Advancement, it is clear, is likely to be obtained only by civil servants who oblige the administration. Sir Andrew seems relaxed about the seismic, and highly damaging, cultural change.

 

THE BEST example of how a public servant has profited from obedience is, of course

 

John Scarlett.

 

As HEAD of the Joint Intelligence Committee, he helped the Prime Minister and Mr Campbell ‘sex up’ the dossier advancing the case for war against Iraq.

 

[On December 15 -2005 George Bush has admitted the Intelligence much coming from the UK was wrong but the war was still OK, as we had removed Saddam Hussein]

 

He [John Scarlett] never wavered in his support for them when the dubious quality of this intelligence was exposed. And now we learn that he had also touted ‘nuggets’ of intelligence to the Iraq Survey Group, which he claimed proved Saddam was a genuine threat.

 

His reward for this betrayal of his calling:

 

He has been promoted head of

 

MI6

 

Meanwhile, Britain’s once-proud intelligence services enjoy a universal reputation for:

 

Incompetence

 

And

 

Servility to politicians.

 

As part of his pursuit of Presidential power, Mr Blair has nobbled various other important institutions. Parliament, in particular, has suffered profoundly.

 

News of important Government business that would normally have been subject of a statement in the Commons -where the MINISTER responsible could be questioned on it- is now broken on Radio 4’s Today programme or in a grovelling newspaper.

 

The House of Lords, whose value as a revising chamber and role in trying to limit the damage done by absurd legislation were crucial, has been emasculated.

 

Hereditary peers with an ethic of Public Service were all but eliminated. The HOUSE was packed with Mr Blair’s cronies. Now further reform is planned to remove what remains of resistance to the Blair line.

 

In the remote event of a Government defeat there, legislation is imposed ruthlessly using the PARLIAMENT Act. We now have, effectively, a single -chamber PARLIAMENT.

 

Meanwhile, our non-political institutions have been corrupted.

 

THE POLICE, once universally respected for their effectiveness and fairness, have become an instrument of social engineering, with CHIEF CONSTABLES falling over themselves in sycophancy to the Government.

 

The FIGHT against CRIME haws taken second place to the implementation of polices on

 

‘Inclusiveness’

for ethnic minorities and homosexuals.

 

This is not the least because ambitious officers know well they will not prosper without toeing the New Labour Home Office line.

 

The BBC, after a rare burst of independence after the death of weapons expert Dr David Kelly, is now far more compliant with the Labour ‘project’. Its institutional Leftism is apparent in the daily tone of much of its news and current affairs coverage.

 

Its political editor is an unashamed Blairite. Once-great newspapers of record are also degraded by their toadying regard for Mr Blair and his philosophy.

 

AND NOT LEAST of the things sullied by Mr Blair is the Honours system: not just in the way peerages have been awarded, but in the shameless manipulation of the system to provide gongs to low-rent celebrities to impress certain elements of the public.

 

Such is the casualness with which Mr Blair has treated the Queen that even she, as the FONT of HONOUR appears to have no more influence over these matters than over anything else ‘HER’ Government DOES.

 

BUT THEN the Presidential project cannot allow for a rival HEAD of STATE, so HER MAJESTY had to be taught HER place. The MONARCHY has been damaged, like every other important institution in Britain, because of Mr Blair’s arrogance and disregard for the

 

OLD

 

CHECKS and BALANCES

 

Sadly, the shocking way he behaved over the Attorney-General’s advice was more than just indicative of his character flaws. It was the inevitable consequence of the destruction of

 

OUR

 

CONSTITUTIONAL

CONVENTIONS

 

If Mr Blair remains in power, his corruption of our great institutions will continue relentlessly. OUR LIBERTIES will continue to VANISH as his POWER mushrooms.

 

And the once-proud boast that the British way of Government is an example to the world will be merely a sick joke.

* * *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used -comments in brackets]

 

[This Essay was published on the 30th April 2005 just before the General Election and most certainly must have had a great impact on many patriotic voters as evidenced by the smallest Labour majority for many a year.

 

The purpose of showing the above at this festive time of CHRISTMAS

Is that with families together it is the right time to?

 

WARN

 

of the consequences of many people not showing the interest when their

OWN

hard fought

Rights and Liberties

are being destroyed by

MR NICE GUY

under your very eyes.

 

A book which will make you think and hopefully react before it is too late:

 

Simon Heffer’s

 

NOR SHALL MY SWORD

 

The reinvention of ENGLAND

 

Weidenfield & Nicolson

The Orion publishing Group Ltd

Orion House

5, Upper Saint Martin’s Lane

London WC2 H 9EA

 

* * *

 

In order to encourage fellow Englishmen to enquire further we will give a few pages of the above publication under the heading

 

A Crisis of Identity

(1999)

 

Chapter one.

 

Only the most unobservant can have missed the latest great fact in what the Victorians so charmingly called ‘our island story’:

 

That the majority of the Scots wish to lesson their nation’s antique ties with ENGLAND [But not lose the special payments they have enjoyed for years]

 

The point was spectacularly confirmed at the General Election of 1 May 1997, when the main Unionist party in Scotland was unable to secure a single candidate to the United Kingdom parliament at Westminster.

 

The message was relayed even more loudly at the referendum on the Scottish parliament held in September 1997, when the Scots voted by a substantial majority to establish a legislative body. [Their later Parliament building cost over £400 million -the majority of which was paid by the taxpayers of ENGLAND].

 

At almost every opinion poll since then it has been shown that public support for the main separatist party in Scotland, the Scottish National Party, is growing steadily [with the encouragement of Tony Blair].

 

In September 1998, exactly a year after the referendum, 50 % of Scots questioned in an opinion survey wanted their country to be independent.

 

[The EDP was formed in 1994 to do exactly this for

 

ENGLAND

 

Another survey [there have been many of them for Scotland but none for ENGLAND] taken three month’s earlier, made the telling point that a majority of Scots, including many who do not wish for independence, nonetheless expect their country to be independent from England within fifteen years.

 

[Well! the way that the majority of Englishmen are shirking their responsibilities to their own country- England may not exist by then]

 

The phenomenon of Scottish separatism is growing not least among the young it has become a fashionable attitude. The glib explanation for why this should be so has for the last few years been that this generation was much moved by the film

BRAVEHEART

 

[‘We now learn that the only accurate thing in the movie is that Scotland and England were at war.’]

 

*

In which mediaeval Englishmen are seen brutalising, oppressing and generally being unsportsmanlike towards mediaeval Scotsmen. It may be that this fairly typical piece of Hollywood anti-English acted as useful propaganda for the Scots nationalist cause, but that cause was well advanced before Mr Mel Gibson lent his reputation to it, and for reasons that we shall shortly explain.

 

*

 

[There are over a hundred and thirty pages of forthright comment from a erudite historian and with a father a newcomer to our Island and a soldier of the Great War which as we have explained elsewhere have in our long history been the most fervent defenders of our FREEDOM and Liberties.]

 

 

Whenever the movement really took off, it is now entrenched. An ICM survey carried out in Scotland for the Scotsman newspaper in June 1998 showed that 63 per cent of people in the eighteen to thirty-four age groups would prefer to see Scotland as an Independent country.

 

[Well the EDP and no doubt millions of the English people wish to be free of the massive contribution to Scotland if the people there have only an interest in their own country instead of the Island of which we ALL share. The policies of the EDP are on our website and we represent

A Family of

Independent Nation States of a Greater Britain]

 

We hope many viewers who have yet to see the above publication will do so because it is as we have explained from the heart of an

 

ENGLISHMAN

*

 

Simon Heffer was born in 1960 and educated at king Edward VI School, Chelmsford, and Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, where he read English.

 

After a spell as a medical journalist and leader writer for The Times, he joined the Daily Telegraph in 1986.

 

In 1991 he became deputy editor and political correspondent of the Spectator also writing a column for the Evening Standard and then the Daily Mail.

 

From June 1994 until October 1995 he was deputy editor of the Daily Telegraph and the paper’s political columnist.

 

Since 1995 he has been a columnist for the Daily Mail and a prolific contributor to other newspapers AND PERIODICALS.

 

His Life of Thomas Carlyle, Moral Desperado, was published by Weidenfeld & Nicolson to widespread acclaim in 1995.

 

His most recent works are [As at 1999]:

 

Power and Place

*

The Political Consequences of King Edward VII

*

And the monumental and much-lauded

 

Like the Roman: The Life of Enoch Powell

*

published by the above named company.

 

The Following are the chapters of

 

NOR SHALL MY SWORD

-THE REINVENTION OF ENGLAND

 

Chapter I

 

A Crisis of Identity

 

Chapter II

 

An English Comedy

 

Chapter III

 

The Rights of Majorities

 

*

JERUSALEM

 

[From the Prophetic Book, “Milton”.]

 

 

‘And did those feet in ancient time

Walk upon England’s mountain s green?

And was the holy Lamb of God

On England’s pleasant pastures seen?

 

And did the Countenance Divine

Shine forth upon our clouded hills?

And was Jerusalem builded here

Among these dark Satanic mills?

 

Bring me my bow of burning gold!

Bring me my arrows of desire!

Bring me my spear! O clouds, unfold!

Bring me my chariot of fire!

 

I will not cease from mental fight,

NOR SHALL MY SWORD

sleep in my hand,

Till we have built Jerusalem

In England’s green and pleasant land.’

 

William Blake (1757-1827)

 

 

*

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

* * *

DEC/05

 

 

BBC NEWS

 

*

The abolition of Britain
 by The Reform Treaty
 - Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

on

21st January, 2008

 

 

 

 

*

LATE NEWS

 

Daily Mail

Tuesday, December 20, 2005.

 

 

FROM BAD TO WORSE.

 

 

*

Sleazebusters Face Axe

 

 

The anti-sleaze watchdog that forced David Blunkett to resign could be facing the axe [unless the truly honourable and individual members of INTEGRITY in Parliament ignore King Tony for this is a matter for the two Houses of Parliament to defend to the death].

 

Tony Blair has been handed a report calling for the ABOLITION of the Whitehall advisory committee on business.

 

THE COMMITTEE aims to STOP Ministers and senior Civil Servants taking up lucrative positions too soon after leaving Westminster.

 

Mr Blunkett, the former Work and pensions Secretary was forced to quit in November -2005 after the Committee ‘named and shamed’ him for failing to consult it over jobs he took in the four months after he first resigned from Cabinet.

 

The advisory Committee, led by Lord Mayhew, released correspondence showing he had ignored its warnings that he was breaking the MINISTERIAL CODE OF CONDUCT.

 

The report by Sir Patrick Brown, a former Permanent Secretary at the Department for transport was commissioned [no doubt to find a way to get rid of this unhelpful and obstructive measure which Blairites detest - as with all other restrictions on their immoral and unaccountable CONDUCT.] was commissioned 18 months ago after Mr Blair rode roughshod over the Committee’s recommendations in the case of former Air Chief Marshall Sir John Day.

 

It wanted a year-long delay in his appointment as a military advisor to the defence contractor BAE Systems on the grounds that the Company would benefit from inside knowledge to win contracts. But Mr Blair overruled it.

 

THE REPORT suggests responsibility for vetting could be passed to Civil Servant Commissioners. [Over which Tony Bliar will have complete control]

 

Mr Blair has already been criticised for scrapping the 83-year-old Honours Scrutiny Committee, a watchdog that aimed to prevent political donors being rewarded with KNIGHTHOODS AND PEERAGES [Lloyd George after World War I]

 

Tory frontbencher Chris Grayling, who was instrumental in challenging Mr Blunkett’s transgressions, said:

 

‘This is a completely breathtaking act by the Prime minister. He has become completely arrogant and out of touch’

 

‘In opposition he demanded accountability and now he is considering abolishing this COMMITTEE.

 

[Well! Mr Chris Grayling it is now eight years since MR NICE GUY the supposed ‘Servant of the People ‘arrived on the scene and he has only got as far as he has in dismantling our THOUSAND -YEAR CONSTITUTION and the CHECKS & BALANCES because of the useless and accommodating OPPOSITION who were led like sheep into an Illegal War and still feel that they have to imitate the Government not of the once GREAT COUNTRY but as lackeys of a FOREIGN POWER in BRUSSELS.]

 

Mr Blair has been sitting on the Brown Report since the Summer. [Well! Tony Blair already looks on the British Electorate as a load of zombies who so wrapped up in their own lives have not awaken to the dangers to their way-of -life and what that truly means.

 

Other Dictators in the world at large must be watching developments in this once Democratic country with much interest particularly Mr Putin in the USSR and many others who have been criticised in our now poodle like assembly which does not deserve the name by which it is known.

 

The example that Mr Blair given of his apparent unlimited arrogance and contempt for the British voter is there for everyone to see and he is getting away with it as shown in his giveaway of £7 billion of OUR hard-won EU REBATE.

While millions of people are enjoying their CHRISTMAS festivities behind the scenes there will be many committed Europhiles who will also be celebrating at the wonderful progress they are still making with the incorporation of ENGLAND

 

into the

 

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

 

solely on the strength of past EU Treaties -particularly

 

MAASTRICHT

 

Signed by

 

John Major and Douglas Hurd.

 

In February 1992, when the signing of Maastricht took place,

 

Douglas Hurd,

 

Then British ‘Foreign’ Secretary, was notoriously overheard commenting, having just signed it, that

 

 

‘We’d better find out what we’ve just signed’.

How will you deal with this Mr David Cameron when you try to convince the 2,600,000 people who voted for the UKIP in the EU Election in 2005 that you care?

 

*

It is stated that ALL signatories of ALL the EU treaties since the 1972 Accession Treaty had received corrupt payments from a NAZI slush Fund.

 

[Full details are on our bulletin board and confirmation obtained from the:

INTERNATIONALLY respected journal

Est. 1969

International Currency Review.

 

www.worldreports.org

 

cstory@worldreports.org

 

*

 

WHY WON’T BLAIR ALLOW INDEPENDENT INQUIRY

INTO

 

LONDON BOMBINGS?

[See our bulletin board for background to the Al Qaeda operation, which was an extension of the BLACK tradition and is ultimately controlled like the IRA

(Until very recently) by the NAZI intelligence service

 

DVD

 

Out of DACHAU-home of the infamous Nazi concentration camp.

 

 

It was the Abwehr Nazi Germany’s main external intelligence administration that first established, as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East.

the

 

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

 

From which all-subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception originate.

 

It will be recalled that the Group of Eight (G-8) met this year at Gleneagles, Scotland.

 

Our sources assert that the London Underground attacks had been scheduled for Wednesday 6th July 2005, their general purpose being to ensure that the global terrorism issue, which is the key dimension of the World Revolution and is being used to leverage targeted countries out of ‘democracy’ into NAZI style police state mode, [As almost already achieved in ENGLAND] swamped the world news media, and hijacked the G-8 agenda.

 

The attacks, sources allege. Were specifically authorised by Jacques Chirac [President of France], which on his orders were delayed 24 hours, in order to block out the news of Britain’s successful bid for the Olympic Games.

[More details elsewhere on bulletin board.]

 

WAKE UP! -ENGLAND

ENJOY YOUR CHRISTMAS

BUT DON’T FORGET YOUR COUNTRY

 

 

* * *

DEC/05

 

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

       
   

TIME FOR DECISION-DECEMBER,2007

 

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!

*

The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of

THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA

*

The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS

*

MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

*

YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.

 

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS  QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.

OR

WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.

WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!

 

THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE

'Rights and Liberties'

of

Englishmen

Will keep by HER SACRED OATH

or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a  THEME PARK in the future

THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.

We are told on the BBC  (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT

'Stuck in the past'

Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of  our

FREEDOM and COUNTRY.

 

Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world.

THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!

 

Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC  as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's  INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by

PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.

 

If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION.

WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?

THEY ARE PRICELESS!

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED

*

 

The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST!

6 months to be EXACT!

*

 

THE EU

 

WE-AND THEM!

 

WE are to join THEM

THEY are not joining US

WE have more to LOSE

THEY have more to GAIN

WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY

THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!

*

Our Queen and the EU Constitution

*

The Spirit of England

by

Winston Churchill

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II

*

We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.

 

 As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER. 

The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.

There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'

Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the  Monarch talks  our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very  noses?

Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS  are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.

We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES  ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.

As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTUTUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.

IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded  we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.

Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a

THEME PARK

*

Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION

and the need for a

REFERENDUM

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

*

 

[All words/word underlined  have a separate bulletin]

 

 
     

 

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138

MPs voted by 362 - 224 for the Reform Treaty in its Second Reading on Monday 21st January. This sixth and final treaty, now renamed the Lisbon Treaty, formally replaces Britain with the European Union on 1st January 2009. This is a year before the deadline set by the Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel.

The Treaty will abolish the British Constitution, and therefore the nations of Britain and England, sweeping away our Westminster Parliament, and giving the EU the power to close it.

The Treaty sets up an unelected three tier politburo executive in Brussels with absolute power, a dictatorship on the soviet model. The EU parliament has no power and is a sham.

Read the Reform Treaty one page summary on the left. Gordon Brown was lying: the Treaty is worse than the constitution.

This sixth treaty is the fastest moving and most secret the EU has drafted; opposition to and recognition of the EU as a police state is growing, and they know speed is vital.

This Commons vote, one of the most important in our history, was largely unreported by our controlled press and media.

 

The Queen and Parliament to complete ratification this spring, 2008

Parliament has allocated 29 days to discuss this treaty in February (not much for its own abolition). They will probably have the final ratification vote in March. The Queen, the EU's most loyal supporter, plans to give her Royal Assent in June 2008. This means Westminster and the Queen will ratify it behind our backs, as they have the other five treaties.

 

No referendum

German Chancellor Merkel chose this sixth Treaty instead of pushing it through as a constitution to avoid referendums in its member nations. She twice visited 10 Downing Street and forced Gordon Brown to cancel both his promised referendum, and his General Election.

"Anti-EU" groups have encouraged us to call for a referendum precisely because the EU has already prohibited it. They know we are wasting our efforts: our four party leaderships take their orders from the EU, not from the voters.

 

How to fight

The real course of action is to change the minds of 70 MP's and get a majority against. MP's have been selected on the Party list system over the last 20 years to ensure an obediant majority of pro-EU MPs.

These MPs now need to understand the EU has the constitution (the six treaties) of a dictatorship, the laws of a police state, and when enforced, its 111,000 regulations will create a government command economy, soviet style: dictatorships cause poverty.

They also need to realise that MPs are the people who put this dictatorship in power. If they put it in power, they are the greatest threat to take it out of power. All dictatorships in the past have eliminated that threat. Inside the EU, the lives of MPs will be even worse than our own; at best, they are likely to be institutionalised and held against their will. (This is the only good bit - these hated traitors will suffer severely.)

Visit your MP in his surgery NOW and explain this. (Instructions top left)

 

 

The EU remains illegal

Each of these six treaties are completely illegal under the British Constitution, our 1689 Bill of Rights, our treason laws, and under our common law. It is unforgivable that the Queen, her Ministers and our Parliament have committed the criminal act of treason by signing these treaties, and broken our laws to abolish our nation.

The EU will always be illegal in Britain; but once the EU has complete power and control here, we can no more get rid of it than we could Germany, had their planned illegal occupation of Britain in 1940 been successful.

 

The Countdown to abolition

Whereas the 465 page EU Constitution would have abolished the five treaties and replaced them with a single document conferring absolute power, the Reform Treaty adds to the existing five treaties, bringing them up to the powers of the EU Constitution. All six treaties with appendices add up to nearly 10,000 complex and unreadable pages. Tony Blair agreed to it on 23rd June 2007 as his final stab in Britain’s back. On the 23rd July there was an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), when we should have seen a first draft of the Treaty.

Foreign ministers agreed its terms on 7-8th September at the resort of Viana de Castelo, Portugal. There was a summit in Lisbon on the 18th and 19th October, where they hoped to sign the Treaty, but Gordon Brown signed it on December 13th 2007, commiting treason, the most criminal act on the statute book.

The EU has decided to act now as if the Treaty were already in force; they are consolidating their power each day. On 1.1.2009 the Reform Treaty and the other five seize all remaining power from our Westminster Parliament, which becomes defunct on that day; it has no remaining powers whatsoever. (The Treaties do allow Brussels to return minor powers, but that is very unlikely.) On 11th June 2009 we have bogus elections to the sham Brussels Parliament, the only elections we will get in the future.

Westminster's five year term expires on 5th May 2010 and a British General Election is due. The six treaties make no provision for an election to our Parliament. By that time the EU will have consolidated its absolute power, and it will almost certainly use it cancel that election and to close Westminster. The EU has always planned to rule what was Britain directly through its 12 nominated Regional capitals, by passing Westminster, from which every function will be removed.

Its founders knew the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. They tried twice before in 1914 and 1939. Britian has to be utterly destroyed for the EU to succeed. The success of the EU's Frankfurt School subversion techniques on Britain (see left) has been astonishing; the abolition of Westminster is one of their final remaining goals.

 

You have 11 months left

Treason is the most serious of all Britain’s crimes. You have just 11 months left to bring these vile British traitors to justice, and get us out of the EU dictatorship.

Around 45 million British people are against the abolition of our nation, and with the little European voting that has been allowed, it seems clear over 200 million of its victims don’t want the EU. But we will never be given the choice. YOU have to decide to act yourself.

There are ways to stop the EU - see "Your Campaigns" on the left. Then we will need a mass blockade of Westminster to stop our criminal MP's and Queen breaking our constitution and laws for the last time.

Copy of the EU's Timetable at the BBC.

Original 2009 article from German Parliament -.pdf for download
Then check it at the German Parliament here

 

 

 

 

Campaigns: Print these .pdf's: One or two pages each.

   Your Campaigns

   Ten EU truths

   Reform Treaty one page

   50 reasons to leave

   EUtruth flier

   Common Purpose

   Abolition of Councillors

   Abolition of 48 Counties

   Map: the 9 EU regions

   Transnational regions


   Reform Treaty full text

   EU Constitution, one page pdf
   EU Constitution: one page html

   Signs of EU police state

   The EU's degraded our lives

   What will the EU be like?

   List of British traitors

   Beef up the British Constitution

   Lib Lab Con: One P