MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
     
     
 

 

THE POLITICS OF TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM MUST NOW END WITH PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION.

 

As many observers have stated over the last few years there is no longer any justification for the present arrangement in Parliament where the main established parties decide the future path of OUR Nation State.

 

We have all seen how there is little light between ALL the parties in their vigorous determination to destroy our Independence as a People as there was NO effective OPPOSITION in Parliament to prevent the illegal war in Iraq and the domestic policies, which have undermined our traditional values of Family and Freedom and Friendship in the International arena.

 

As many have said particularly over the last eight years there is a need of a new breath of fresh air in the portals of Westminster with new political champions to speak for millions of people who’s views are ignored by the established Cabal in the House.

 

What is needed
Is

PR-Proportional Representation

 

in order that the millions who voted in the European Election for the representatives of the UKIP can be democratically given their seats in OUR House of Commons.

 

We have the ironic situation that while we in this country are unable to obtain a more truly democratic system of P.R. at the very moment the Iraqi Government has affirmed its new Constitution which as Blair and Bush has agreed has reached its decision by a PR system of Election

 

-which neither of the two main parties in the UK wish to look at because they are very happy with the tweedledee and tweedledum arrangement which they find very convenient and have no wish to change.

 

The Lib Dems once very energetic on the question of PR are also pleased with their share of the spoils of power and no doubt also do not wish to see other parties in the Commons Chamber.

What we find most curious is why there is not a demand from the voters in England for P.R to match the Northern Ireland and the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly.

 

When one looks at the lengthy list of political parties which exist in England we wonder WHY there has been no attempt to form AN ALLIANCE of ALL unrepresentative parties outside of the Westminster system to Campaign for a P.R System of Election in order that the next election is fought on a more level playing field - after all - as a nation we pride ourselves on our traditional characteristic of FAIR-PLAY.

 

So why not get together and make a start?

 

If we are in error in not being aware of any such campaign at present in existence we would be pleased to hear and will give our support on our Bulletin Board and in any other way we are able to help.

 

We all know that the majority of voters get on with their lives and leave the politicians to get on with their jobs on our behalf. That may be a sound reason when things are going along the way we all like but we now have our brave soldiers dying and injured some disabled for life because of an illegal war.

 

We have our society in turmoil over the growing crime -rate particularly gun-crime -burglary- drug culture and now the 24hour drinking which will increase the crime and distract the Police from their duty to protect our country from bombings which our politicians by agreeing the illegal war have brought on the people of our country.

 

We now hear that there are only 900,000 bird-flue vaccines in the country. In England alone we now hear there are over 50,000,000 people so one can see that the small number of vaccines available is insufficient to protect the population of England - let alone Wales - Scotland and Northern Ireland.

 

The recent catastrophe in the Southern States of America has shown that the failure to provide adequate funds before the disaster strikes is the common fault of politicians everywhere who spend money to get the headlines but fail to protect the livelihood and health of the nation.

 

But they the have decided to give the limited supply of vaccine to the emergency services -hospital staff and doctors and no doubt the elite in Blairdom.

 

No need to worry about the majority of people particularly the voters who mistakenly brought the Blair Government back into power.

 

We are now informed that the gap between the rich and poor has widened in the reign of King Blair.

 

How Did This Happen?

 

Because the majority of voters were more concerned with their own lives and failed to realise that as history has taught previous generations over thousands of years if the people are not vigilant their Freedom will be forfeited in time.

 

In The Guardian of Monday the 29th August 2005 in their COMMENT COLUMN they had an article headed:

“Animal Testing”

 

“Rights and Wrongs”

 

… The last paragraph was as follows:

 

‘Of course the behaviour of animal rights

protestors are unacceptable. But using animals in experiments will only continue to be tolerated for as long as it is clear that the most energetic efforts are being made to ensure only the absolute minimum are conducted.’

 

 

[As a reputed people who in the main love and cherish their animals this is no doubt the bottom line. But it is another case where if there had been a political party in existence, which pursued a vigorous campaign to justify the number of animal, experiments - the picture might no doubt be different today.

 

To rely on in the main - two political parties to protect the interests of ALL the people and their interests has now sadly proved to be naïve as the politicians of the last few decades have their own agendas and that is ALL they are concerned with.

 

Protection of the Freedoms and Liberties of the People - our environment -local schools and hospitals and the importance of preventing cruelty to animals are only a few of the many issues, which have been ignored by the Traditional political parties.

 

We also read from The Guardian of the same date under the heading:

 

Leaks puts foreign policy role in fuelling extremism under scrutiny

 

by

 

Duncan Campbell & John Aglionby

 

 

The following is only the first few paragraphs of the article in question as follows: -

 

[The point of showing this leaked report is to once again to emphasis and there is little accountability in our Parliament.]

 

 

Government Foreign Policy came under fresh scrutiny yesterday after the leaking of Foreign Office documents showing that the Government was warned more than a year ago that the war in Iraq and policies in the Middle East were creating anger and dismay among Muslims in Britain.

 

A letter from Michael Jay the Foreign Office Permanent Under-Secretary, to the Cabinet Secretary Sir Andrew Turnbull stated: -

 

“Experience of both Ministers and Officials suggests that… British Foreign policy and the perception of its negative effect on Muslims globally plays a significant role in creating a feeling of anger and impotence among especially the younger generation of British Muslims.

 

The letter, leaked to the Observer continued:

 

“There seems to be a key driver behind recruitment by extremist organisations (e.g. recruitment drives by groups such as Hizb-ut-Tahrir and Muhajiroon)

Dated May 18, 2004 the letter suggests that a “recurring theme is the issue of British Foreign policy, especially in the context of the Middle East peace process and Iraq.”

 

The Liberal democratic Foreign Affairs spokesman Sir Menzies Campbell said yesterday

 

‘The leak undermined Government claim that the Terrorist threat was unrelated to the war in Iraq.

 

“When a figure of such experience and authority as Michael Jay highlights the relationship between our Foreign Policy and disaffection among Muslims, the immediate question for the Government must be:

 

What weight did they attach to his advice and what was their response?

 

“The Government and the Prime Minister [Tony Blair] in particular has sought consistently to deny any connection between our Foreign Policy and the Terrorist threat. Sir Michael’s perceptive analysis undermines that position substantially”….

 

The above is a classic example of the deceit of the Foreign Minister -Our Man Of Straw who all along has supported the false claim of the Prime Minister that the illegal war in Iraq was NOT the result of the carnage in London of July 7-2005.

 

In the Daily Mail of August 31- 2005 an article by their Political Correspondent Graeme Wilson we learn that ‘Straw admits Iraq war is fuelling extremism’ and he agreed the letter sent last May to Cabinet Secretary Sir Andrew Turnbull.

 

 

The above examples show how within the present structure of our limited Parliamentary landscape it is so easy for the Government of the day to embark on illegal war.

 

They at the same time ignore the threat which we ALL face from the coming deadly flue epidemic which will soon reach OUR island home and if the past is any indication then millions of our people will die because a Government with an annual budget of £900billion was unwise to ignore the risks to its people for the sake of a few millions of pounds.

 

We now hear that the bulk of the vaccine will not reach us until 2007 -so keep your gas mask on until then.

 

This is yet another example

 

WHY - We should have PR-Proportional Representation at the next General Election and we hope that from henceforth ALL who love their country and its values will fight to ensure that no longer will we rely on the established parties alone to make the decisions that effect our Freedom and OUR way-of- life and that which concerns the safety of our own lives in our homes on the streets and in our places of work.

 

In order for a change to take place it will require a robust newspaper to lead the Campaign for Electoral Change but we must not hold our breath as the prospects look decidedly bleak.

 

 

Because of the control that the established parties have on our Free Press and the power they can use in forestalling any change in the Election System it will take a brave stance by any newspaper to crusade on such an important and necessary change to our parliamentary election procedure.

 

Regretfully because of the inability of the existing political parties to prevent an illegal war and to protect the well being of the people of Britain it is no longer possible to rely on the present election system of representation to continue without change.

 

The CON Party was reborn in 1833 and one of its early election slogans was:

 

‘Conservative, not destructive Reform.’

 

At the time the message was an indication that only necessary changes would be taken at the time. 0nly the previous year 1832 the first Reform Bill was passed because not to do so would have meant dangerous civil unrest.

 

Since the 1950’s members of the CON Party and particularly when in government have pursued a policy of carrying out Constitutional change in order to enslave the people of Britain into a United States of Europe.

 

Their past and present impotence as Her Majesty’s Opposition is ample evidence that their party was not and is not capable to talk on behalf of millions of voters in the country who are greatly concerned about Immigration- Europe -Constitution - and the illegal war in Iraq which the majority of their MP’s supported.

 

But the country is also asking questions on Education- Transport- Tax and Pensions - Law and Order - Environment -Health Care - just a few of the matters requiring positive answers from a Government which has never had it so easy with a so-called OPPOSITION which should be prosecuted under the Trade Description Act - for its failure to give the service it was expected and had been paid to perform.

In the past the question of a proliferation of parties in Westminster was vetoed because it was said it would affect the need for a strong government. But we have seen over the past 32 years how such a system had almost taken away the Freedom of our Nation State and led us into an illegal war in Iraq.

 

It is time for a change because the present system has been devalued and found wanting in protecting the Ancient Constitution and our historic Freedoms and Liberties.

 *

 

* * *

AUG/05

 

*

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

       
   

TIME FOR DECISION-DECEMBER,2007

 

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!

*

The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of

THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA

*

The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS

*

MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

*

YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.

 

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS  QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.

OR

WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.

WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!

 

THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE

'Rights and Liberties'

of

Englishmen

Will keep by HER SACRED OATH

or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a  THEME PARK in the future

THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.

We are told on the BBC  (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT

'Stuck in the past'

Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of  our

FREEDOM and COUNTRY.

 

Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world.

THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!

 

Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC  as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's  INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by

PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.

 

If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION.

WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?

THEY ARE PRICELESS!

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED

*

 

The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST!

6 months to be EXACT!

*

 

THE EU

 

WE-AND THEM!

 

WE are to join THEM

THEY are not joining US

WE have more to LOSE

THEY have more to GAIN

WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY

THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!

*

Our Queen and the EU Constitution

*

The Spirit of England

by

Winston Churchill

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II

*

We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.

 

 As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER. 

The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.

There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'

Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the  Monarch talks  our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very  noses?

Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS  are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.

We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES  ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.

As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTUTUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.

IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded  we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.

Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a

THEME PARK

*

Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION

and the need for a

REFERENDUM

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

*

 

[All words/word underlined  have a separate bulletin]

 

 
     

 

 

13th October,2007

 

So You Want Out Of The EU

 

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British  (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

 

[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 08]

 

*

 

Letters to the Daily Telegraph

Wednesday 27th June-2007

 

Stop the excuses and hold an EU referendum

SIR - In April 2004, we sent a PETITION of over

 1,000,000

signatures to the Queen requesting

NO ROYAL ASSENT

to any

BILL

-authorising the proposed

EU CONSTITUTION

-unless approved by at least two thirds of the

ELECTORATE

in a

REFERENDUM

Three weeks later, Tony Blair promised a referendum, on which

HE and GORDON BROWN

have since reneged as being unnecessary.

 

The revamped version of the

EU Constitution

-is virtually identical with its predecessor, and Mr Blair's attempts to hide this is a shameful

BETRAYAL OF THE COUNTRY.

THEREFORE

If our elected politicians refuse

TO HONOUR THEIR OATHS

I propose that an

INDEPENDENT REFERENDUM IS ARRANGED

-funded and conducted without further ado, preceded by a

FULL HONEST PRESENTATION OF THE FACTS.

This would at least provide a reliable unspun indication of public opinion. We should also insist that there is

NO GOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH BRUSSELS.

until the outcome of the

REFERENDUM

IS KNOWN

The British people can then choose whether they wish to be subjugated by

AN ALIEN POWER

OR

SET FREE!

 

JOHN GOURIET

Dilton Marsh, Wiltshire

*

[ Mr John Gouriet needs no introduction as his eminent work  together with his once close colleague the late Chairman of the Freedom Association Norris McWhirter whose life was brought to an end by his persisted hard work on behalf of his country - has been on our front page since its beginning.]

 

 

SIR - An Act of Parliament to ratify a

NEW EU TREATY

not only alters the external relationship between the British State and foreign states, but also the internal constitutional relationship between the

BRITISH STATE AND ITS CITIZENS

The Irish Republic has a

CODIFIED CONSTITUTION

-which can be amended

ONLY

BY

REFERENDUM

That is why the Irish Government has been

COMPELLED

 to hold

A REFERENDUM

ON EACH OF THE EU TREATIES.

At one time, Labour politicians were in favour of

REFERENDUMS

-to settle constitutional questions-for example on whether there should be

DEVOLVED GOVERNMENT

IN

SCOTLAND

But their enthusiasm for letting us have a say began to wane when voters in

NORTH EAST ENGLAND

threw out John Prescott's proposal for an elected

REGIONAL ASSEMBLY

None the less, every Labour MP was elected in 2005 on the

MANIFESTO PROMISE

of a

REFERENDUM

on the

NEW EU TREATY

-and they must not allow themselves to be bullied

INTO BREAKING THEIR WORD.

 

Dr D. R. Cooper

Maidenhead,Berkshire

 

[We know of Dr Cooper a a regular contributor to Eurofacts  a fortnightly journal

www.junepress.com]

 

 

 

 

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

 

JUNE/07

 

*

*

*

 

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

(http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/)

The  Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

*

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]