THE BRITISH
LEGACY - AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND -
WHY THEY MATTER?
Since our entry into the EEC in 1972
when we disregarded Winston Churchill’s advice of 1930 when he had uttered
those words which have been taken out of context, on many occasions since “:
“ The prosperity of others makes for our own prosperity; their peace is
our tranquility; their progress smooths our oath… We rejoice at every
diminution of the internal tariffs and martial armaments of Europe… But we have
our own dream and our own task. We are with Europe but not of it. We are
linked. But not compromised. We are interested and associated but not
absorbed “
To our kin in those countries which have shown their loyalty in two
World Wars and in other conflicts since, an Act of Parliament of the year 1701
has still today much significance.
Apart from the religious aspect and the emergence of Cabinet Council
much hated at the time and which was only finally approved by the Regency Act
of 1705.
“What!” it maybe asked, “has the Act of Settlement
got to do with people outside the United Kingdom?” Indeed Australia is not
mentioned because seventy -five years would pass before Captain Cook claimed
New South Wales for the Empire.
Clause 2 of the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act of 1900 indisputably states:
The provisions of this Act
referring to the Queen shall extend to her Majesty’s heirs and successors in
the sovereignty of the United Kingdom.” This means
that whatever changes may be made to the British Crown will affect our own
Crown (of Australia) and indeed that of the other Realms.
Philip Benwell - MBE, has provided the main substance
of this essay in the year 2001, in his pamphlet:
“The Act
of Settlement of 1701
And its
relevance
To the
Commonwealth Realms
In the
year 2001”
Because of the recent Government intention to accept
a new European Constitution without full consultation with the British People
the EDP
considers this the ideal time to bring to the notice of the British People that
we are not alone in requesting a Referendum on the vital issue of the Self
Determination of the British Peoples at home and abroad.
To continue: Prior
to the Constitutional Referendum (Australia) of November 1999, a survey found
that less than 15% of the population were aware that Australia had a
Constitution let alone knew anything about it. How low, I wonder, would be the
percentage of the population and even in Britain itself who would have any
knowledge of the Act of Settlement of 1701 and yet it is perhaps the most
vilified piece of legislation on the Statute books of the United Kingdom.
However, nestled in the safe security of our new
developed Westminster System, why should people need to know about
Constitutional matters and about the Bill of Rights and the Act of Settlement?
Was it not Thomas Gray who wrote some 252 years ago?
“Since sorrow never comes
too late
And happiness too swiftly
flies
Though would destroy their
paradise
No more, where ignorance is
bliss
‘Ties folly to be wise”
The idea of a United Europe is not new. After all,
was this not the design of Charlemagne and centuries earlier of Rome itself?
Modern European Union had its roots in the early
years of the nineteenth century when the numerous principalities within Prussia
grouped into one protectionist economic unit. Bismarck later consolidated the
thirty- nine states allied in the German Confederation into what became known
as the German Empire.
The defeat of Germany in 1918 inspired rather than
put aside plans for European Union and achieved initial success on an
experimental basis with Hitler’s conquests.
The Nazi inspired hopes of a United States of Europe
collapsed with Germany’s defeat in the Second World War. However, some were
able to persuade Washington that a future war would not be able to be averted
unless there was a united Europe. The CIA and others poured money into the pro
European Movement, which still included Nazi collaborators.
Even though the United States Government placed
unprecedented political pressure on Britain to conform and enter union with
Europe, it found intractable opposition in Churchill who, although seeing
wisdom in a European economic association, was against any form of direct
involvement by Britain. (Words spoken are shown above)
However successive British Governments since Churchill have capitulated
to pressure and allowed Britain to be almost totally absorbed into EUROPE
Our own Robert Menzies (as we have already mentioned
these words in the main have been spoken by Philip Benwell - MBE of the
“
International British Movement
P O Box
1068
Double Bay
New South
Wales 1360
Australia”
Was vehemently against BRITAIN entering into an
alliance with Europe for he quite correctly thought that this would lead to an
abandonment of its trading and cultural links with Australia and the other
Commonwealth countries, but the pressure was too forceful and the later
groundwork laid by McMillan and Heath and the USA too strong and today Britain
is submerged, possibly irreconcilably, into Europe.
Whilst the British Government did consult with the
Australian Governments, it was clear that it was more of an ultimatum (We in this
country have experienced similar treatment) than to
seek a consensus. In the 1975 Referendum in Britain, the British Government
even went so far as to publish leaflets containing a quote supportive of
Britain’s entry into Europe from non other than our own enigmatic Gough
Whitlam! (We had Spin even then)
It is true that, as a nation now totally politically
independent from Britain, Australia could really do no more than to say that
entry into Europe was a matter for the United Kingdom, just as this same sort
of official language was used by Britain when commenting on our own
Constitutional Referendum in 1999.
Britain was the founder signatory to the European
Convention on Human Rights, however it was only two months ago that the British
Parliament incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into British
Law thereby giving it legal precedence as a sort of new Bill in the United
Kingdom.
The overriding power of the European Human Rights was
felt even before it became a part of UK law when the Court, meeting in
Strasbourg in December 199, upset the verdict of a British Court in the trial
of the boy murderers of two year old Jamie Bulger with their ruling that the
two 11year olds tried as adults did not receive a fair trial.
Some weeks ago (year - 2000) the Guardian newspaper
which seems to be intent on destabilizing the British Constitution
-had an editorial which in its usual form attacked
the British Monarchy and condemned the Act of Settlement of 1701.
Within a few days (at the time)
the Guardian newspaper had retained Robertson and
committed itself to funding an action before the European Human Rights Court on
the basis that the Act of Settlement “clashed with the Human Rights Act and
should be reinterpreted or removed from the Statute Book.” Reports indicate
that Notice of such action is to be served on the High Commissioners in London
of the Commonwealth Realms.
(Please note:
For full details of the Act of Settlement
and the History of the period please refer to the Essay following this
Introduction)
For well over a year (Philip Benwell) I have been
raising concerns over the Constitutional implications that Britain’s now
political entry into Europe has to the Realms and instead of blindly signing
whatever Brussels demanded of it, Britain had a duty to not only confer with
the Governments of the Realms but in the terms of our Constitution and that of
Canada the matter should have been put to the People for their agreement (We in the UK
should have taken the warning at the time) -as
should, may I say, the Australia Acts of 1986.
Returning to the Guardians challenge that “The Act remains
the crucial cornerstone of the British Constitution exercising an extraordinary
hold over the Monarchy and imposing limitations designed to tackle the
imperatives of a political crisis at the dawn of the 18th century.
But it is scarcely relevant to the 21st century.”
However whilst times have changed and indeed changed
radically, many of the circumstances which led to the need for the Act
have-not.
In a Constitutional Monarchy, the Monarch must Assent to any law passed
by parliament provided that such a law is Constitutional. To refuse would cause
a Constitutional Crisis.
According to the Constitution of Belgium, the person
of the King has immunity, which places the King above religion
And ideology. However when, in 1990, the Parliament
of Belgium passed the controversial Abortion Bill, tremendous pressure was put
on the former King Baudouin, a practicing Roman Catholic not to sign it.
The King courageously refused to sign and the only
solution left for him was to abdicate, which he did for a day. King Baudouin
died in 1993.
Our Coronation Oath commits our Sovereign to a
lifetime of service, which means that the Queen cannot abdicate, even for a
day.
Therefore should a similar dilemma occur in Britain
it could not be resolved so easily and would precipitate a severe
Constitutional Crisis, which is why?
The Sovereign of
Britain was made Supreme Governor of the Church of England and thereby totally
immune from any influence or direction from Foreign Powers (Please
refer to our other Bulletins on this subject).
Thus it is that the legal authority Blackstone was
able to assert:
“ That the English Law is superior to that of other nations because
liberty under the law was the purpose of the British Constitution.”
Recent attacks against the Act of settlement are that
it discriminates also against new British subjects and under the Act no Muslims
or Hindus can ever succeed to the Throne!
To what will be its everlasting shame, THE Guardian
itself admits that it has been advertising in Germany for a claimant to the
British Throne but without success. Obviously the head of what is left of the
Stuart line, Franz, Duke of Bavaria, has no interest in this treacherous
nonsense. Indeed in its three hundred years of existence, no legitimate
claimant to the Throne of the United Kingdom has ever formally challenged the Act
and unfortunately this publicity gimmick of the Guardian will only serve to
cause confusion in the minds of the People.
It was Napoleon who said “ Four hostile newspapers are
more
to
be feared than a thousand bayonets”, and unfortunately in our
society where, I may say, the constitutional freedom we enjoy is due to such
laws as the Bill of Rights and the Act of Settlement, an irresponsible media
(As
evidenced today with those few who refuse to see the truth when they see it)
and embittered poseurs will always with us. They are indeed the downside of our
Constitutional Democracy (Which is the safety valve of
our Freedom even when shown to be an evil in our midst- We hope they will pause
to remember that?) - and we can only hope that
through their constant abuse of the privilege of a Free Press, they themselves
will become entangled in their own duplicity before they succeed in tearing
down the fabric of their own democracy.
It was Sir Walter Scott who wrote:
`O what a tangled web we
weave
When first we practice to
deceive`.
Today (2000) it is a saddening sight to see how far
and how fast the European Union is encroaching on the Sovereignty of the
British Parliament, on English Common Law and indeed on the everyday life of
the ordinary person.
There was a time when the National Interest was
the Prime Consideration of any Member of Parliament (See EDP Bulletin -The
Tyranny of Cabinet Government) However to their everlasting
shame, successive BRITISH governments have bartered away a thousand years of
RIGHTS AND LAWS of the English People in exchange for a repressive officialdom
and a fragile seat at the increasing Despotic Table of (so called) United
Europe.
Hailed as the resurrection of the Holy Roman Empire,
the European Union is drawing to itself executive authority over its Member
States and is even now planning a centralized army and a centralized police
force.
Whilst we now have our own unique Crown of Australia,
it in itself, is meaningless without the Crown of the United Kingdom for it is
through the Crown of the United Kingdom that the magnificent History of
England, fine tuned over centuries of strife, warfare, death and deliberation
comes down to us to perfect the checks and the balances gifted to us in the
Westminster System and the improved upon by our Founding Fathers with the
incorporation of the Referendum Process.
The major Commonwealth Realms of Australia, Canada
and New Zealand are Democracies now politically independent of the British
Government, our Constitutions evolved from Acts of the British Parliament and
are inextricably linked to the Constitution of the United Kingdom through the
Crown.
Regardless of whatever discussions may have been held
between our Governments over the years, the signing of any agreement or treaty
by Britain which may have the potential to infringe upon our own Constitutional
Arrangements should have received the Agreement of the Peoples of Australia and
Canada through our individual Referendum Processes.
Just as the Guardian is seeking to use European
legislation to challenge the British Constitution, it is time perhaps for
lawyers well versed in such matters to investigate the possibility of
challenging the very acceptance of any European legislation entered into by the
British Government (This has been done)
which may have even the slightest potential of affecting Constitutional
Arrangements within the Realms.
For what, we in the Realms may ask (We in the United
kingdom ask the same question - we are still awaiting an answer from Tony Blair)
did we sacrifice the lives of our young to defend Britain against the `Powers
of Darkness’ in Europe? Sacrifices were made, not only once but also on two
occasions, only to find our Peoples cast aside as Britain humbled itself before
our once traditional enemies.
The Guardian has held a Poll in a attempt to seek
vindication of its attack on the Act of Settlement - but only a few readers
-2021 have responded. Such is their mandate. (The EDP received over 3000 votes at the European
Election even though it was nobbled to prevent it using its Party Name as was
used in the 1997 Election -before the 1998 Election Legislation was introduced-further details on our
web-site) .
However the Guardian’s challenge, whilst obviously of
no real interest to the General Public, has served to highlight the Duplicity
of the British Government and its Infidelity to the Realms as to betray us all
to European Control.
Events since the savagery of September the 11th
have reinforced the general opinion of the British People that this British
Government, with their Spinning friends, and a large number of Members of
Parliament have no longer the interests of the People in mind but their own
personal interests within the gravy train of European Despotism.
It is said that the People get the Government they deserve - this is
true in as much that the People considered that though they had little time for
Politicians they did not expect the gross deceit and lies in matters of life
and death which has been revealed over the past year.
The People have the answer in their own hands at the next By-Election
and the next General Election.
* * *
*
*
Veteran parliamentarian
TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity
of a
REFERENDUM
HEAR
HIM ON
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
| |
|
|
| |
WHY NO TREATY
LIMITING EU POWERS
CAN BE RELIED ON
As the British Government prepares to
ratify the revived [EU]Constitution WITHOUT
its PROMISED REFERENDUM , claiming its
"RED LINES"
will "PROTECT"
UK
interests, a leading barrister describes the
role of the
EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
-in expanding the
POWERS of the EU
by
Martin Howe QC
*
eurofacts
-Historical
Fact Sheet No 2
eurofacts@junepress.com
*
November-2007
|
|
| |
|
|
|
REMEMBER!
The EU Elite will DO ANYTHING to see THEIR
years of WAITING
REWARDED
A diversion HERE or THERE - WHAT ABOUT some
BIRD FLUE?
or WHATEVER -THEY will TRY
ANYTHING
being SO CLOSE to the CULMINATION of 35 years of
TREASON THEY NEED
WATCHING LIKE A HAWK
WHILE the EUROSCEPTIC FORCES achieve THEIR UNITY
AND MOVE FORWARD TOGETHER TO SEND THE
TRAITORS PACKING! |
| |
|
|
| |
A
RATIFIED LISBON TREATY WILL TAKE AWAY YOUR
ONCE FREE NATION STATE AND AT THE SIGNING
CREATE A UNITED STATES OF EUROPE
-SUPER-STATE.
IS THAT
WHAT YOU WANT?
The treasonable Lisbon
Treaty should have brought millions onto the
streets -our greatest landmarks such as
Trafalgar Square -The Mall-and around
Buckingham Palace filled with protesting
subjects of the Queen demanding that HER
ministers reject the
TREATY which must
NOT BE
SIGNED by HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN the sworn
PROTECTOR of our ANCIENT and
SACRED
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.
All ministers of the CROWN
have sworn an OATH:
"To bear
faith and allegiance to the Crown and defend
its jurisdiction and power against all
foreign...powers...states."
WE MUST
SEE THAT THEY HONOUR THAT PLEDGE.
*
A TREATY
- TOO FAR?
Treaty Timetable
13-14
December 2007
The treaty
to be signed by heads of government
February
2008
Ratification process begins in the House of
Commons
March
2008
Ratification process begins in the House of
Lords
June
2008
Likely date
for Royal Assent
December
2008
Expected
completion date for ratification
1st
January 2009
The new
treaty comes into force,
11th
June 2009
Elections
to the European Parliament
Spring
2010
Last
possible date for a General Election
*
* *
The Lisbon Treaty:
was it an historic turning point?
by
Eurofacts-The Reality Behind
Europe
2nd
November,2007
*
*
*
THE
ENEMY WITHIN IS YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT WHICH
INTENDS TO SELL YOUR COUNTRY TO FOREIGN
POWERS.
*
|
|
|
|
| |
TIME FOR DECISION-DECEMBER,2007
THE
BRITISH
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW
ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.
*
The
Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT
SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!
*
The
Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW
of
THE
COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA
*
The
Commonwealth Realms V The
Constitution for Europe-
4-PARTS
*
MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT
THE CROWN
*
YOU
CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS
QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE
LAST
IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND
-SCOTLAND AND WALES?
Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING
TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE
OF EUROPE.
OR
WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT
PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT
NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT
THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO
BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM
THERE MUST BE.
WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN
SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE
WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL
FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE
'Rights and
Liberties'
of
Englishmen
Will keep by HER SACRED OATH
or the MONARCHY be nothing
more than a
THEME
PARK in the future
THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT
SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE
OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN
DIRE PERIL.
We are told on the BBC
(Brussels Broadcasting Service)
at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd
December, 2007, that the QUEEN
now has a website which has
footage of the Royal Family in
the past and that the QUEEN is
NOT
'Stuck in
the past'
Well! as far as many
patriotic subjects are concerned
we need to remain in the PAST
when it concerns the protection
of our
FREEDOM and COUNTRY.
Change we have had and will
continue to have but it must not
threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE
our Common Law of England and
all which makes our country the
most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to
protect our inherited RIGHTS and
Liberties then we shall have to
fight for a REPUBLIC as
happened in the 17th century
because the Monarch of the day
ignored those very
'Rights
and Liberties of Englishmen'
which will still survive in the
English Speaking World today in
December 2007. How can the
MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away
what is already our and our
children's INHERITANCE which
cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the
above publicity exercise is to
be used to soften the impact to
the population of the BETRAYAL
of their CONSTITUTION and
COUNTRY then it would be the
greatest TREASON by a Monarch
since James II who sold our
COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY
and RELIGION.
WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS
AND LIBERTIES WORTH?
THEY ARE PRICELESS!
*
*
The Choice is Yours!-but time is
running out FAST!
6 months to be EXACT!
*
THE EU
WE-AND THEM!
WE are to join THEM
THEY are not joining US
WE have more to LOSE
THEY have more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators
from EUROPE for most of our
HISTORY
THEY have been cursed with that
abomination for most of their
HISTORY and NOW!
*
Our
Queen and the EU Constitution
*
The
Spirit of England
by
Winston Churchill
*
THE ENEMY IS
EVERYWHERE
*
MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN
ELIZABETH THE II
*
We now learn from the Daily Mail
COMMENT on Christmas Eve that
the Queen's Speech will cover
the catastrophic fall in Values
and Moral behaviour since the
beginning of her 56 -year reign.
This has been brought about by
the actions of HER MINISTERS and
the greater number of those in
HER PARLIAMENT who have placed
THEIR CONCERNS before the
INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and
NATION STATE.
As for the fact that HER PEOPLE
feel LOST that has been the
direct result of the actions of
HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and
the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS
including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56
years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN
have almost achieved their aim
of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a
FOREIGN POWER.
The reason for the marked drop
in the number viewing THE
QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt
because the mass of people have
realised years ago that the
MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT
their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up
to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it
the case on Christmas Day 2007
while the Monarch talks our
Rights and Liberties are being
taken from us under our very
noses?
Of
course the QUEEN under HER
CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only
'Advise and Warn' HER
MINISTERS but when the matter
concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that
HER MAJESTY consider the
arrangement to be AT AN END as
it would make a MOCKERY of the
PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH
to protect our inherited Rights
and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO
GIVE AWAY.
We as loyal subjects of the
MONARCH who is the living
embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and
LIBERTIES ask at this late
stage with only months to the
eradication of a FREE NATION
STATE some veiled comments that
HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the MORAL tone of the
NATION STATE at this most
crucial time in ENGLISH
CONSTUTUTIONAL HISTORY this
matter should be left to CHURCH
LEADERS who's responsibility it
is to CARE for their FLOCKS
particularly at this FESTIVAL of
CHRISTMAS.
IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not
been pre-recorded we ask HER
MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS
of HER subjects some hope that
their PROTECTOR has NOT
FORGOTTEN THEM.
Should this APPEAL not be
answered we can at last confirm
that the MONARCHY is after all
nothing more than a talking shop
suitable for YouTube and
therefore nothing more than a
THEME PARK
*
Hear Tony Benn's comments about
the despotic and corrupt
EUROPEAN UNION
and the need for a
REFERENDUM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
From a politician with
INTEGRITY and love of country
who has for decades witnessed
the growth of the monstrous
creature soon to be a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
*
[All words/word underlined have
a separate bulletin]
|
|
| |
|
|
The
abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
MPs voted by 362 - 224 for
the Reform Treaty in its Second
Reading on Monday 21st January.
This sixth and final treaty, now
renamed the Lisbon Treaty,
formally replaces Britain with
the European Union on 1st
January 2009. This is a year
before the deadline set by the
Chancellor of Germany, Angela
Merkel.
The Treaty will abolish the
British Constitution, and
therefore the nations of Britain
and England, sweeping away our
Westminster Parliament, and
giving the EU the power to close
it.
The Treaty sets up an
unelected three tier politburo
executive in Brussels with
absolute power, a dictatorship
on the soviet model. The EU
parliament has no power and is a
sham.
Read the Reform Treaty one
page summary on the left. Gordon
Brown was lying: the Treaty is
worse than the constitution.
This sixth treaty is the
fastest moving and most secret
the EU has drafted; opposition
to and recognition of the EU as
a police state is growing, and
they know speed is vital.
This Commons vote, one of the
most important in our history,
was largely unreported by our
controlled press and media.
The Queen and Parliament to
complete ratification this
spring, 2008
Parliament has allocated 29 days
to discuss this treaty in
February (not much for its own
abolition). They will probably
have the final ratification vote
in March. The Queen, the EU's
most loyal supporter, plans to
give her Royal Assent in June
2008. This means Westminster and
the Queen will ratify it behind
our backs, as they have the
other five treaties.
No referendum
German Chancellor Merkel chose
this sixth Treaty instead of
pushing it through as a
constitution to avoid
referendums in its member
nations. She twice visited 10
Downing Street and forced Gordon
Brown to cancel both his
promised referendum, and his
General Election.
"Anti-EU" groups have
encouraged us to call for a
referendum precisely because
the EU has already
prohibited it. They know we
are wasting our efforts: our
four party leaderships take
their orders from the EU,
not from the voters.
How to fight
The real course of action is
to change the minds of 70 MP's
and get a majority against. MP's
have been selected on the Party
list system over the last 20
years to ensure an obediant
majority of pro-EU MPs.
These MPs now need to
understand the EU has the
constitution (the six treaties)
of a dictatorship, the laws of a
police state, and when enforced,
its 111,000 regulations will
create a government command
economy, soviet style:
dictatorships cause poverty.
They also need to realise
that MPs are the people who put
this dictatorship in power. If
they put it in power, they are
the greatest threat to take it
out of power. All dictatorships
in the past have eliminated that
threat. Inside the EU, the lives
of MPs will be even worse than
our own; at best, they are
likely to be institutionalised
and held against their will.
(This is the only good bit -
these hated traitors will suffer
severely.)
Visit your MP in his surgery
NOW and explain this.
(Instructions top left)
The EU remains illegal
Each of these six treaties are
completely illegal under the
British Constitution, our 1689
Bill of Rights, our treason
laws, and under our common law.
It is unforgivable that the
Queen, her Ministers and our
Parliament have committed the
criminal act of treason by
signing these treaties, and
broken our laws to abolish our
nation.
The EU will always be
illegal in Britain; but once
the EU has complete power
and control here, we can no
more get rid of it than we
could Germany, had their
planned illegal occupation
of Britain in 1940 been
successful.
The Countdown to abolition
Whereas the 465 page EU
Constitution would have
abolished the five treaties and
replaced them with a single
document conferring absolute
power, the Reform Treaty adds to
the existing five treaties,
bringing them up to the powers
of the EU Constitution. All six
treaties with appendices add up
to nearly 10,000 complex and
unreadable pages. Tony Blair
agreed to it on 23rd June 2007
as his final stab in Britain’s
back. On the 23rd July there was
an Intergovernmental Conference
(IGC), when we should have seen
a first draft of the Treaty.
Foreign ministers agreed its
terms on 7-8th September at the
resort of Viana de Castelo,
Portugal. There was a summit in
Lisbon on the 18th and 19th
October, where they hoped to
sign the Treaty, but Gordon
Brown signed it on December 13th
2007, commiting treason, the
most criminal act on the statute
book.
The EU has decided to act now
as if the Treaty were already in
force; they are consolidating
their power each day. On
1.1.2009 the Reform Treaty and
the other five seize all
remaining power from our
Westminster Parliament, which
becomes defunct on that day; it
has no remaining powers
whatsoever. (The Treaties do
allow Brussels to return minor
powers, but that is very
unlikely.) On 11th June 2009 we
have bogus elections to the sham
Brussels Parliament, the only
elections we will get in the
future.
Westminster's five year term
expires on 5th May 2010 and a
British General Election is due.
The six treaties make no
provision for an election to our
Parliament. By that time the EU
will have consolidated its
absolute power, and it will
almost certainly use it cancel
that election and to close
Westminster. The EU has always
planned to rule what was Britain
directly through its 12
nominated Regional capitals, by
passing Westminster, from which
every function will be removed.
Its founders knew the EU
dictatorship cannot be built
while there is a strong and
freedom loving Britain on its
doorstep. They tried twice
before in 1914 and 1939. Britian
has to be utterly destroyed for
the EU to succeed. The success
of the EU's Frankfurt School
subversion techniques on Britain
(see left) has been astonishing;
the abolition of Westminster is
one of their final remaining
goals.
You have 11 months left
Treason is the most serious of
all Britain’s crimes. You have
just 11 months left to bring
these vile British traitors to
justice, and get us out of the
EU dictatorship.
Around 45 million British
people are against the
abolition of our nation, and
with the little European
voting that has been
allowed, it seems clear over
200 million of its victims
don’t want the EU. But we
will never be given the
choice. YOU have to decide
to act yourself.
There are ways to stop the EU
- see "Your Campaigns" on the
left. Then we will need a mass
blockade of Westminster to stop
our criminal MP's and Queen
breaking our constitution and
laws for the last time.
Copy of the EU's Timetable at
the BBC.
Original 2009 article from
German Parliament -.pdf for
download
Then check it at the German
Parliament
here
|
Campaigns: Print these
.pdf's: One or two pages each.
Your
Campaigns
Ten
EU truths
Reform
Treaty one page
50
reasons to leave
EUtruth
flier
Common
Purpose
Abolition
of Councillors
Abolition
of 48 Counties
Map:
the 9 EU regions
Transnational
regions
Reform
Treaty full text
EU
Constitution, one page pdf
EU
Constitution: one page html
Signs
of EU police state
The
EU's degraded our lives
What will
the EU be like?
List
of British traitors
Beef up
the British Constitution
Lib Lab Con: One
Party State
The Queen
The EU's Hitler
The
EU costs £200 billion pa
The
dictatorship: Quotes
UK
> EU handover of power.
EU
subversion diagram.
Subversion:
Common Purpose
Frankfurt
subversion.
The
terrorism deception
Abolition
of our 48 counties
Abolition
of Parliament.
Church
flier
Some
revolutionary lyrics
drjn.co.uk
- copy of this site
The
Westminster News
The
Devonport Column
The
Cornish Free Press
The
British Free Press
Government
disinformation
Mobilisation
talk
Blueprint
to get out
SS
child snatching
Wood's
rigged elections
Stood
for the leadership
|
Where we are now:
1. Since 1972 The
Queen has illegally
signed five of the six
EU Treaties.
2. The five treaties
define and build the EU
as an unelected
dictatorship.
3. The EU's laws,
passed by Westminster,
give it the powers of a
police state.
4. The sixth EU
treaty will complete the
abolition of Britain as
a nation
- the Queen is due
to sign it this year.
A foreign power, the
EU, will then rule us,
and enforce the laws of
a police state.
Shouldn't we
repeal the 1972 European
Communities Act now
before we are imprisoned
permanently inside?
We've only got till July
2008.
Please fight the
campaigns at the top of
the menu on the left.
The leaderships of the
Conservative, Labour and
Lib Dem parties have
been controlled by the
European Union for two
decades. It is the EU
agenda they implement in
Parliament, not your
wishes, which is why
your vote doesn't count.
Our controlled press
and media haven't
reported it, but
Britain would have been
abolished in November
2006 if the French
and Dutch hadn't voted
down the EU
Constitution.
Instead a sixth and
final Treaty will now be
signed; after which EU
Commissioners will have
the power to impose the
Constitution (and the
Euro) on us, and enforce
the laws of a police
state.
5. Thirty three
years inside the EU -
have you noticed how our
democracy is being
withdrawn?
The EU has already
denied us that most
basic of human rights -
the right to vote
against the EU and to
keep our own nation. A
majority of us don't
want to be in the EU. We
are being forced in
against our will.
Do you feel you've
become powerless, unable
to influence events, or
your vote is worth less?
The six treaties have
been gradually removing
our democracy; for
thirty years our laws
have been "harmonised"
with the EU; 80% of the
laws now passed by our
Parliament are EU laws,
not ours. Isn't the real
reason people have lost
interest in politics
precisely because the EU
has taken away our
ability to change
things?
Common law, where the
government was our
servant, is now largely
replaced by the EU's
Corpus Juris, which puts
the government above the
law, and we don't
participate. We have
already lost most of our
rights (including habeas
corpus). The power of
government grows
unchecked, as does that
of large corporations.
Politicians continuously
lie about the EU,
pretending its not
significant.
6. Massive EU
corruption
The EU's auditors have
found the fraud is so
widespread they've
refused to sign off the
EU's accounts for each
of the last ten
years.
Whistleblowers like
Marta Andreason, the EU
Budget Director, who in
2005 found the EU
couldn't account for
95% of its £66
billion budget, are
simply fired for telling
the truth.
7.The bribing of
our Politicians by the
EU
Europe works by bribing
politicians with huge
salaries and expenses to
vote for Europe, against
the best interests of
their own voters.
As a result all three
parties are in favour of
the EU - Westminster
acts like a one party
state of politicians:
the Lib-Lab-Con. The
parties are run top down
and implement the policy
of their leaderships,
not that of their
members. (unfortunately
UKIP is run in the same
way). If you have voted
for the Labs, Cons or
Lib-Dems since 1969,
you have voted
for the EU
dictatorship.
8. EU corruption
is now exploding through
our Civil Service, our
local government, and
our 7,000 quangos.
A shadow EU government
lives inside our
bureaucracy,
headquartered in the
Office of the Deputy
Prime Minister (ODPM.)
It includes many parts
of government including
the RDA and the Regional
Assemblies. Common
Purpose, an EU
organisation, the UK
branch also
headquartered in the
ODPM, has members across
many government
organisations including
some city and county
councils, the Land
Registry, the police and
the NHS, which it is
destroying from within.
Common Purpose
is the glue that enables
fraud to be committed
across these government
departments, most of it
lining the pockets of
politicians and
bureaucrats. It often
involves the sale of
public assets such as
land to friends of
politicians or their
businesses. (The RDA
-The EU Regional
Development Agency, is a
major player in this
type of fraud.) And the
handing out of plum
government non jobs with
big salaries and
expenses to members of
Common Purpose, all of
it involving the theft
of our money as
taxpayers. The Chief
Executive Officer of
Common Purpose is Julia
Middleton of the ODPM.
9. Businesses
closing under EU
regulation
The EU's 111,000
regulations, when fully
enforced, will transform
Britain from a free
market economy into a
Soviet style command
economy, closing
hundreds of thousands
more businesses. They
will also control our
personal lives far more
closely than were those
of Soviet citizens. (In
a Parliamentary answer
to Lord Stoddart in
January 2003, the
government admitted
there were 101,811 EU
regulations, growing at
3,500 pa).
The cost of Britain's
8,500 quangoes is £124
billion a year, and they
raise an additional £40
billion from us in
charges, according to
the Cabinet Office. The
Public Bodies Directory
2006 describes only 882
of them. Most exist to
enforce EU regulations;
nearly all should be
closed.
10. The EU costs
us £200 billion pa, 20%
of our economy
According to the
government's Better
Regulation Task Force
Annual Report 2005
(Introduction written by
Tony Blair,) complying
with EU regulations now
costs our economy over
£100 billion a year.
By far the largest
treasury expense is now
the £167 billion spent
on the EU's 8,500
quangos, (Cabinet Office
figures) most of which
enforce EU regulation.
This is patronage,
bribery, putting
thousands of officials
and influential
businessment on £100,000
- £300,000 a year
salaries. That's why the
Exchequer is so
desperate for cash and
can't pay for the navy,
nurses, students etc.
Economists say we
lose £80 billion pa by
associating with the
EU's inferior economies.
The EU took our fishing
industry, which costs us
£5 billion pa. EU damage
to other industries
(like forcing us to
close the Rover Car Co)
a further £20 billion.
Our EU contribution is a
relatively minor £10
billion, the only bit
the Press discuss.
Before we joined the
EU we had an even
balance of trade with
them. Now EU regulations
have fixed it so we lose
£30 billion year trading
with the EU on our
balance of payments.
We'd be enormously more
wealthy if we left.
The main use of taxes
is now to finance
government and its
greedy whirlpool of
waste; they've doubled
in real terms in the 33
years we've been in the
EU. There's less money
in the economy left for
wages, creating a
growing underclass who
can't make ends meet.
11. Our counties
to be abolished
The Queen signed the
1992 Maastricht Treaty,
which adopts the EU
Regionalisation Plan.
This will abolish
England's 48 counties
and replace them with 9
European regions, each
with their own Regional
Capital, which reports
directly to Brussels,
not to Westminster. This
effectively obliterates
the country of England.
For example the County
of Cornwall is replaced
by the South West
Region, which stretches
from Lands End and
includes Gloucestershire
and Wiltshire; its
regional capital is
Exeter. As this move is
unpopular it is being
kept low-key and will
not be implemented until
the sixth treaty is
signed, when we lose our
right to object.
12. The deliberate
destruction of our
standards and way of
life,
From Sunday trading,
where large stores force
staff to work Sundays
for derisory pay - or
they don't get a job, to
the deliberate
undermining of the
family and teachers, to
sex education for the
under 13's, to children
being given obscene
homework, its all
traceable via our
compliant government
back to the EU over the
last 34 years, as it
sucessfully implemented
the subversion of the
Frankfurt School. While
inside atheist Europe,
British Christianity has
almost died out; safety
on our streets and a
great chunk of civilised
life has left with it.
13. The EU has
controlled our
immigration since 1997
In January 2007 on the
front page of The
Westminster News we
forecast 1.5 million
immigrants for the year,
and people laughed at
us. On January 24th 2008
the Daily Express
published government
figures of 1.3 million
Polish immigrants alone
for 2007. With Romania
and Hungary joining in
that year the total was
probaly double that. The
Amsterdam Treaty handed
control of our
immigration to the EU.
30,000 a year used to
arrive - the EU's
increased it by 60
times That's why
house prices have been
screaming up, even
though the population of
original British people
is falling.
Politicians and huge
corporations like
immigration - with
thousands of immigrants
available on low pay,
they can impose the
minimum wage on
millions. Politicians
then lie that they can't
get British workers to
do dirty jobs. The truth
is they won't offer a
decent wage, and
cynically use immigrants
to drive wages down,
adding to the huge
underclass.
The Government
pretends there are a
maximum of 145,000
immigants annually, and
1.5 million new houses
will be needed to house
them. But then Jack
Straw admits that 2.6
million immigrants
applied to stay here
last year.
Our infrastructure
and services can't stand
such huge numbers and is
breaking down in some
cities, where English
people are becoming a
10% minority. But the EU
controls it, not the
Foreign secretary, and
he has no power, no
options but to do as EU
policy dictates, and
accept it.
Michael Howard was
lying on the 24th
January 2005 when he
said he'd fix
immigration - as Prime
Minister, he'd have had
no control over it
whatsoever. Immigration
hurts our existing
immigrants first - new
immigrants move into
their areas, decreasing
the wages and increasing
the pressure on housing.
If the sixth
Treaty is signed, we
lose our right to
withdraw and Britain
ceases to be a nation.
Like the other six, it
only requires two
signatures: the Prime
Ministers, and the
Queen's |
|
|
Examples of how
our lives have
degraded since
we've been in
the EU:
In the EU,
(which means in
Britain)
government is
above the law.
The EU's corpus
juris now
pervades right
through our
legal system. A
policeman was
let off by
magistrates this
year (2005) for
driving his
private car at
159 mph in
Ludlow, Shrops.
Under Corpus
Juris the
government are
above the law
and cannot be
prosecuted The
judge ruled
correctly under
EU law. 45,000
police officers
got off speed
cameras in this
way in 2004,
although their
speeding killed
44 innocent
people. (Daily
Mail 27.12.05.)
EU
"monitoring
Officers" have
the right to
dismiss our
Councillors.
The Local
Government Act
of 2000
empowered the
head of the EU
government in
England, the
Office of the
Deputy Prime
Minster (ODPM)
to appoint a
monitoring
officer to spy
on every
council. If an
elected
councillor
disagrees with
the EU or
government line,
the unelected
"Standards Board
for England" can
suspend him for
up to five
years. An
example is in
Cambridgeshire,
where the ODPM
has threatened
cllr Alex Riley
with suspension
if he attends
any debate
discussing the
ODPM's plans to
build a new town
of 20,000 people
called Nothstowe
on his ward. The
ODPM has the
conflict of
interest here;
but its powers
are becoming
absolute.
We have
lost the right
to freedom
The EU arrest
warrant (signed
by the Queen on
18th November
2003) allows us
to be arrested
without charge
and held
indefinitely
with no right to
see a solicitor,
make a phone
call, or even a
right to a
trial. You can
simply
disappear.
Under the
Serious
Organised Crime
and Police Act
(SOCPA) 2005, we
can now be
arrested and
held in the
cells by any
police officer
for any petty
offence, like
dropping litter.
Before it had to
be an offense
that carried a 5
year jail term.
This also
applies to all
of the EU's
107,000
regulations. Do
you know them
all?
The Civil
Contingences Act
2004 allows
government to
confiscate
anything you
possess
permanently; you
have no right to
object. This
includes your
house. It also
gives government
the right to
forceably move
its population
around to
different
locations; you
can be left with
no place to call
your own and
live like a
refugee. The
only check and
balance here is
a Minister just
needs to utter
the words "This
is a national
emergency." If a
demonstration or
strike
government
doesn't like is
being organised,
they can cut off
all
communications
in a town -
phones, mobiles,
the internet,
TV, and block
all access to
that town
including
closing roads
and railways. It
has all the
powers and more
of Hitler's
Enabling Act of
1933.
We have
lost the right
to free speech
At the Labour
Party conference
the police held
an 82 year old
man, Walter
Woolfgang, and
denied him
access to the
conference under
the EU's "anti
terrorist"
legislation
because he had
shouted the word
"nonsense" at
Jack Straw, who
was speaking
about Iraq.
Terrified the
true nature of
the laws they
have passed on
behalf of the EU
was escaping too
early, the
Labour Party
stopped the
police and
begged the man
to return to
conference.
On October
25th 2005 Miss
Maya Evans was
arrested under
the Serious
Organised Crime
and Police Act
2005, for a lone
protest at the
Cenotaph by
reading out the
names of the 97
British soldiers
killed in the
Iraq war. She
was arrested by
no less than 14
police officers
and found guilty
at Bow Street
Magistrates
Court on the 8th
December 2005.
Would you
hand over our
nation, to be
ruled by a
foreign power,
with oppressive
laws like these,
? That's what's
happening.
We have
lost the right
to protest
These laws make
protest very
difficult; if we
did hold a
General Strike
and blockade
Westminster it
would now
require some
bravery: the
powers the EU
has demanded
from our
government
enable it to
respond in a way
similar to the
Chinese
government's in
Tiaanamen Square
should it so
wish.
It is no
coincidence that
since 2004, all
MP's offices in
Westminster are
guarded by
police with
machine guns,
inside and out.
The
Governments
"terrorism"
deception
All these new EU
laws, including
massive "anti
terrorism" acts
(recently 2000,
2001, 2005) were
passed with the
pretence they
were only
directed at
terrorists,
or in the case
of Asbos,
ruffians who
terrorise the
streets. In each
case they are
used far more
often against
ordinary law
abiding people,
particularly to
suppress
dissent. (91% of
those detained
under Terrorism
Acts are
innocent and
have been
improperly
arrested. Most
of the remainder
are charged with
offences that
have nothing to
do with
terrorism, but
cover up over
zealous
arrests).
We have
lost the right
to life
Under EU law the
"Shoot to kill"
policy did not
need democratic
authorisation.
Just two senior
police officers
authorised the
police to kill
British people.
A democratic
vote by
Parliament was
not required,
but even that
would not have
legalised the
killing under
British common
law. A recent
victim was an
innocent
Brazilian, Jean
de Menezes, shot
dead in
Stockwell
underground
station, even
though he was
being held down
by police
officers at the
time of the
execution. The
police used
dum-dum bullets,
outlawed under
the Geneva
Convention
because they
blow a man to
pieces inside.
The police
can no longer be
convicted for
killing innocent
people - Philip
Prout shot at
Lewannick in
East Cornwall is
just one of 30
people shot dead
by police since
1992 when corpus
| | | |
