ENGLAND
is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE
in POLITICALLY-CORRECT
BLAIRDOM.
Toadying to every
stupid asinine brainless scheme, which emanates from New Labour’s
politically correct nut-cases who will not take the hint from
A FEW prominent observers in their own camp of the mess they
are responsible for and NOW say
POLITICAL
–CORRECTNESS
The following timely article in
by
expresses our and no
doubt the majority view in the country that unless the majority
fight backs and gains control
We’re hated by
other countries (because we defeated them) and run by a quisling
class of moral appeasers (who crush dissent with political correctness).
RECENTLY,
I MADE A TELEVISION DOCUMENTARY CALLED Why
England’s F****D. And
before you all get cross, let me make one thing clear: The presenters of TV programmes do not choose
the titles.
It
was a predictable title though, because last summer my family
and I were a subject of a ‘fly-on-the-wall’ documentary called
THE F***ING Fulfords (like many families, we occasionally swear
at each other.
And
the truth is that it does reflect, in the crude vernacular my
views of this country.
What
is
England’s problem then? Or perhaps more accurately: what is
the
English people’s problem? This is a complicated question, but
one salient aspect seems to me to be our lack of cultural identity.
Ask
a Frenchman what makes HIM
French and he will explode in a volume of speech
and much waving of hands. Ask the same question of an
Englishman and
he will become embarrassed and ‘um’ and ‘err’ like Hugh Grant.
Why is this?
I believe it is simply because
we are the most successful nation there has ever been
It was, I think, Cecil Rhodes
who said:
‘To be born an Englishman
is to win first prise in the lottery of life.’
But it is, paradoxically, from that overwhelming success that
our current problems stem.
While the
Scottish prance around
in kilts and the
Germans,
God help us, force themselves into over tight lederhosen,
we
English are seemingly bereft of a national dress.
Except, of course, that simply is not true. What has happened is that our national dress-
the classic
English suit (developed
from the practical country gentleman’s hunting coat of the 18th
century), the tweed jacket, the blue blazer with gilt buttons-has
been adopted by the whole world as the smart thing to wear.
The world should be eternally grateful, incidentally that
it wasn’t the
Germans who dominated the globe in the 19th century, as we would
all be wandering around in leather shorts if they had. Imagine Charles Clarke, the Home Secretary
dressed up like a Bavarian at a beer festival.
No, on second thoughts, I’d rather not.
But it is not only our national dress that the world has adopted.
They have also taken our language which some time in
the late 19th century as our Empire expanded, replaced
French
as the lingua
franca of educated and business people.
And then there are our team games:
Football
Rugby
And
Cricket
All
English in origin, have
conquered the planet, as the individual sports we invented such
as
Boxing
Snooker
Squash
And
Lawn Tennis.
So
English culture is everywhere
triumphant and has become, to all intents and purposes world
culture.
AND THEREIN LIES A PROBLEM
Because our culture and customs have been adopted by everyone
else, we the
English are left without a separate cultural identity.
Think about it for a moment. The whole developed world-and quite a bit of the undeveloped part-
apes our traditional dress, tries with varying success to speak
our language, reads our literature, and plays, often better
than we do, our national games.
NO WONDER WE, AS A RACE,
WE HAVE BECOME CONFUSED.
A lack of cultural identity, though, is not the whole reason
for our decline as a race. Our overwhelming success has resulted
in another problem, which on the face of it may seem to be an
asset.
WE DON’T HAVE A CHIP ON OUR
SHOULDER.
OR
AN INFERIORITY COMPLEX.
It is this ‘chip’ or sense of grievance, which gives nationalists
everywhere their
raison d’etre.
Where would the
Scots be without their
constant whining about the Highland Clearances (when thousands
of peasants were forced from their homes by landlords during
the 18th century)?
Why can’t the
French survive without
incontinent emotional reference to La
France and the Gloire
de France, celebrated annually with much pomp by
the
French Army strutting
its stuff down the Champs Elysee on Bastille Day?
Because while they have had the odd military success against
second division countries, whenever they have played, in the
premier league against
England they have for the best part of a thousand years, been soundly thrashed.
It must, and does irk virtually every other country that somewhere
in their history there is an episode when the
English have beaten them up.
Indeed, you could argue that
English
history is too long. We have been a nation
for well over a thousand years, which compares to Italy, which
has only been around since 1861, and a united
Germany, which is even
younger. Spain
it
is true, has been a single entity since 1492 and although technically
France
has a long pedigree, it has to be said that for much of the
medieval period the majority of what we call
France was governed rather
well by the
English.
The trouble with us
English is that we have
succumbed to the old truism that ‘success breeds failure’.
It is not that we are arrogant and complacent which are often
the by-products of success. In truth, in the
English,
arrogance seems to be refreshingly absent.
Instead, in our case, success appears to have bred diffidence
and shame about our origins, a wish to apologise, a desire to
please, and a yearning to be loved by other nations and races.
Unfortunately, this longing to be loved has gone unrequited
because as I have said, virtually every other country and race
has a monumental chip on its shoulder – and the chip is usually
about the historical success of the
English.
Which means the collective wish of most foreign countries
[With
Tony Blair and his
cronies and politically
correct idiots]
is to humiliate us and make us grovel.
But what is most perplexing about all this is that there exists
within the governing classes of the
English
a
‘fifth
column’ whose aim also seems to be to humiliate their
country and denigrate its historical supremacy.
Over the past 50-odd years these Quisling-like characters
have taken
CONTROL
Of much of the
MEDIA
The CIVIL SEVICE
JUDICIARY
And
of course
It
has long seemed to me that one of the greatest injustices of
political history is that the most reviled politician of the
20th century is
Neville
Chamberlain, who famously appeased
Adolf Hitler.
Certainly
his act of appeasement was a disgrace. But then, with the honourable
exceptions of
Margaret Thatcher and the almost forgotten
Anthony
Eden, every single other post –war Prime Minister
would have undoubtedly followed the same course.
Because
appeasement-be it on the overseas front in our negotiations
with foreign countries or on the domestic one with trade unions
in the Sixties and Seventies [As
today about Pensions], or with vociferous minority
‘rights’ groups today- has been the constant theme of British
politics since Suez in 1956.
The culture of rights is a cancer on our society.
Appeasement is bad enough, but on top of this has been the
desire of successive governments to hand over power either to
undemocratic foreign bodies, such as the
EU or worse still,
unelected judges who are given such poorly-drafted rushed-through
laws that they can be interpret them as they please.
So we are presented with the absurdity of an elected MP, who
as Home Secretary is charged by the people of this country with
its internal security, being repeatedly frustrated by an unelected
judiciary.
A judiciary which consistently interprets the deeply –flawed
European Convention on Human Rights in a way few in Parliament
imagined when they mistakenly voted to incorporate it into UK
law.
And it is this takeover of power by the legal profession from
the people, which has fuelled the most damaging aspect of modern
England, ‘the culture of rights’
which, like a
cancer, is spreading throughout
English society.
Cliché it may be, but in the modern lawyer-run
England, everybody has rights but no one has responsibilities.
These rights though, come at a cost.
ONE MAN’S RIGHTS ARE ANOTHER MAN’S RESTRICTION
ON FREEDOM.
As I found when making my documentary.
So much of what I wanted to say couldn’t be broadcast, as
it would have been in breach of one of the many
Acts
[of Parliament] which
NOW
RESTRICT YOUR RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH
My discussion on immigration – a subject of vital importance
to this country- with someone from race-relations industry in
East London was deemed unfit for broadcast.
[Well if Mr Fulton will send us a copy we will certainly give
it PRIME space –on the grounds of Free Speech ALONE]
In other words, the fundamental right of an
Englishman
to say what he bloody well thinks
no longer exists. It has, by stealth, been removed.
[Well here again it only requires a massive disobedience to
a bad law for it to be ignored and eventually repealed. Might we suggest a
National Disobedience Week
every few months in
the year-obviously co-ordinated –possible Mr Fulton would be
able to help, as he appears to have the appropriate credentials
to give the
Politically-Correct Brigade the fright of their life.
Only recently we heard that the Police and no doubt other
PC bodies have a list of words, which may not be spoken in their presence.
Well on the particular weeks of the campaign this would
be a must whenever anyone is in their presence. This is of course a habit, which should be
encouraged and extend to the full 365 days in a year –every
year.
ANYTHING, WHICH WILL ANNOY
THE DESTROYERS OF OUR LANGUAGE AND FREEDOM, WILL HELP THE DOWNFALL
OF
PC.
And why has it [[Free Speech] been removed. Because successive
governments
have caved in to the new
robber barons
of
England,
the minority pressure groups.
These lavishly funded organisations often sheltering under
charitable status, flourish in the environs of Westminster. by a mixture of:
Emotional blackmail
Lies
They arm-twist the Media and the Government into supporting
their demands.
So, for example, Londoners have been denied the use of the
hugely popular Routemaster double decker bus, an ICON of the
CAPITAL, because they are NOT disabled –friendly.
Of course, the disabled in any society deserve our special
consideration and help. But
if you believe the literature promulgated by the pressure groups,
there are
11.5 million disabled people
in
the UK.
This is patent rubbish as anybody who is not genuinely blind
can surely see.
LOOK AROUND YOU
Are one in six of your friends and acquaintances disabled?
Of Course not- but then the pressure groups stretch the definition of disability
to include virtually every
human being on the planet.
As part of my research, I attended a London Transport ‘disability
awareness’ course and found that because I have mild dyslexia,
even I qualified as disabled.
To my disbelief, so did a women being weighted down by their
shopping need help getting on a bus.
AT VAST COST- Sir Ian Blair, the head of the Metropolitan
Police and a slave to political correctness changed the Met’s
logo from handwritten script to upright type so it does not
discriminate against short-sighted people.
That is just a small example of the ridiculous waste of money
I am talking about. I shudder to think what the total cost to
the economy of acceding to the constant demands of minority
lobby groups over the past 25 years has been.
[Hundreds of these groups [we would call them PARISITES
and deadly diseases on society] are happily trampling over the needs of the majority in this way:
-
Outlawing
Christmas lights