[THE NEXT TIME YOU DECIDE TO VOTE REMEMBER]

GORDON BROWN HAS RULED OUT A CAP ON IMMIGRATION

Yesterday April 2-2008 the Prime Minister rejected any annual limit on the entry of foreign workers into the country arguing that the influx of immigrants had brought much needed skills to vital sectors of the economy.

[ We fail  to see the relavance of such a statement as needed skilled workers would always be allowed in on a Quota system] .

It came only hours after Liam Byrne, his IMMIGRATION MINISTER suggested ministers might consider a cap after reviewing the first years of the new "points-based "system.

Mr Brown's staunch defence of his immigration strategy followed the publication of a report yesterday by the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committe which challenged the fundamental claims of Labour's OPEN-DOOR IMMIGRATION POLICYand called for ANNUAL LIMITS.

 The PEERS found that the influx of labour from abroad had delivered

NO SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT FOR UK RESIDENTS

Speaking at a Downing Street Press Conference, Mr Brown said the arrival of foreign workers, increasing the population by 190,000 every year, has brought much-needed skills to vital sectors of the UK economy.

He added: " Many of these people are highly skilled workers who are important to the economy. Most people in the CITY of LONDON know they have benefited very substantially.

"Not just from the inward investment that's coming from international companies but the number of key workers who are coming to join them and are making a huge contribution to the British economy.   [Daily Telegraph-April 2-2008-James Kirkup-Political Correspondent.]

[OUR ONLY COMMENT IS TO LOOK INTO THE REAL WORLD OF EVENTS DESCRIBED IN THE UNDERMENTIONED BULLETINS]

IMMIGRATION

SPOTLIGHT OF THE WEEK

*

IMMIGRATION -THE WIDER PROSPECTIVE

DEMOGRAPHY IS DESTINY: WHY MASS IMMIGRATION ASSISTS THE EUROPEAN PROJECT

Most people who contemplate Europe's political future are more concerned about the mass transfer of Muslim people into Europe than about terrorist threats.   Terrorism is a nuisance and has the power to shock but it can only become a potential major threat if the terrorists obtain and use weapons of mass destruction.  The steady build-up of a minority clearly at odds with its host culture is far more significant and a far more intractable challenge to the national identity in the long term.   This is, of course, not a problem when seen through European Union [soon United States of Europe] eyes.   Any weakening of national identity  is [the purpose of the EU] is a necessary sacrifice.  When, Mr Barroso declared:  'Sometimes I like to compare the EU as a creation to the organisation of empire" , British politicians expressed indignation and some even demanded retractions.  But his words were entirely apt.   The main instrument is the 'free movement' of people', a policy usually enunciated with misty eyes by europhiles while its presumed economic benefits have been accepted even by eurosceptics.   The idea of free movement of persons surfaced in the Treaty of Rome as a means to allow EU-native workers to work outside their native EU countries.  It has now been massively extended, not only by conferring 'rights' on intraEU movement but also by widening the benefits to include the right to start businesses, and the right to study at the British taxpayers;' expense.  Nevertheless, the number of these movements is still quite small in relation to the total EU population.   The EU believes that those EU nationals who work or study in ntheir non-native country are LIKELY TO BE SUPPORTIVE OF THE EU POLITICAL ORDER- AND THE MORE OF THEM THE BETTER.    A NEW IDEA has now TAKEN HOLD among EU POLICY MAKERS which is that IMMIGRANTS from outside the EU will become SPECIAL SUPPORTERS of the EU IDEAS as they will have NO CONFLICTING NATIONAL LOYALTY.   So Barroso is now planning an INTAKE of 20,000,000 WORKERS (PLUS DEPENDENTS [will add many more millions to the figure-which suits their  COMMON PURPOSE]', with the right to 'circular migration', that is to move freely from one EU country to another.  If the Nations of the EU are not changing into Homo Europeans fast enough, ready- made IMPORTS will  ACCELERATE THE PROCESS.

LACK of POLICY -Demography is destiny and if firm intention is to establish a political order a demographic policy is vital.  Britain's lack of policy in relation to the inflows and outflows of population shows that the POLITICAL ELITE regards demographic destiny as less important than 'human rights' and the needs of business for LOW-PAID labour;  this in turn is EVIDENCE that it has ALREADY SURRENDERED REAL POLITICAL POWER to the EMERGING POLITICAL ORDER, and no maidenly aversion of eurosceptic eyes can conceal THIS.   [ANDREW SCHOLEFIELD -a valued contributor to eurofacts www.junepress.com -speaking at a London seminar on IMMIGRATION. The remark which produced the chorus of in-drawn breaths was to the effect that the EU had a similar interest in managing large -scale movements of population to HITLER and STALIN.  Scholfield was not , of course suggesting that Mr Barroso is as brutal as the GERMAN and RUSSIAN DICTATORS or that he displays an IDENTICAL CASTE of TOTALITARIAN, --[TIME WILL TELL?]

[AS they say 'When you're in you're in and when you're out you're out  but when you're only half -way in you' re neither in nor out' which sums up the situation at the moment.

 WE NEED TO BE OUT!

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

     [FOR COMPLETE  TRANSCRIPT -

CLICK HERE

*

*

MAY-2008