Once more unto the breach,

dear friends,once more;...

/Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge/ Cry 'God for Harry!

ENGLAND and ST GEORGE!'

 

OPPORTUNITY

'There is a tide in the affairs of men

Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life

Is bound  in shallows and in miseries.'

Shakespeare

*

 

OCT H 1 2
3 4 5  6

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019      MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

Sorry!-  Some of our many links have been contaminated and we will endeavour to correct the problem, as quickly as possible. Starting with the headings and footnote information as of

 November 6,2019

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK .

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

Image result for Winston Churchill-'We are a part of Europe but not of it...

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 		SEP 19

OCT-19

NOV-19

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

[A

 

 

CONSTITUTIONAL

 

BETRAYAL]

 

 

 

BY ANDREW ROBERTS

 

HISTORIAN AND AUTHOR

 

 

'The prestige we have lost as a country needs to be

 

considered as a

 

 major national catastrophe'

 

 

 

THE humiliation that has befallen the United Kingdom over the past three years and four months as a direct result of the refusal of our political class to respect the EU refendum of

 

JUNE 2016

 

needs  to be investigated by an

 

OFFICIAL COMMITEE of INQUIRY

 

 

For there will be undoubtedly be lessons to be learned about what went wrong with our brokebn politics. and how it can be fixed.

 

[The answer is that many of the trouble rousers had been in the job

 

TOO LONG

 

We have advocated that MPs

should

 

SERVE ONLY ONE TERM]

 

 

WE might even require changes to the

 

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

 

ensuring that it can be made fit for purpose once again, and that such a vicious period of

 

OPEN DEMOCRACY

 

 

Hatred is never repeated.

 

The prestige which we have lost as a country needs to be  considered in terms of a major national catastrophe, and we need to recognise

 

 

WHAT HAD HAPPENED

 

 

AND

 

 

WHY

 

 

Fortunately there is a good deal of precedent for such an

 

 

INQUIRY

 

Many such investigations have taken place - even after wars in

 

which we were victorious.

 

 

The Roebuck Inquiry into the Crimean War uncovered many

 

abuses and inefficieencies that led to important reforms of

 

VICTORIAN SOCIETY

 

especially in its

 

MILITARYand GOVERNMENT SPHERES...

 

 

...I suspect that the person who has most to fear from the

 

INQUIRY

 

,however, is not even Theresa May, but Jeremy corbyn. His time

 

in front of the committee's cameras will make great viewing as

 

he is taken step by step through every single Labour change in

 

policy, in nuance, in prediction. WE will all be shown with total clarity how at every turn

 

HE PUT AMBITION OVER PATRIOTISM

 

AND

 

OPPORTUNISM OVER PRINCIPLE

 

History shows again and again that countries that face

 

the horrible truths

 

about traumatic periods of their past emerge better able

 

to embrace reconciliation.

 

For that reason, the sooner the

 

COMMITTEE OF ENQUIRY

 

sits once BREXIT is done

 

the BETTER.

 

IT HAS A LOT OF WORK TO DO.

 

*

 

 

[Many MPs are Destroyers

 

 of our unique English Constitution

 

instead of Defenders]

 

[This is an extensive and learned article, and we will endeavor to cover it over the oncoming weeks. In the meantime, you can click

 

HERE!

 

 For the FULL ARTICLE or Below.]

 

*

 

 

ANDREW ROBERTS: Britain needs an official

 

 

inquiry

 

on

 

Brexit

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-7592013/ANDREW-

ROBERTS...

 

19 hours ago · ANDREW ROBERTS: Britain needs an official inquiry into how the elite turned Brexit into a national humiliation. By Andrew Roberts For The Mail On Sunday. Published: ... and we need …

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 20,2019

 

H.F.1912

 

 

 

*

 

 

[HOW IT BEGAN]

 

TREASON

 

Conservative skulduggery

BACK in 1972 -Tories desert to EU camp

SHORT-TERM SELF-INTEREST EXPLOITED

The UK Accession Bill passed its Third reading on 13th July 1972 by a majority of 17.

Earlier, the debate on the Second reading had lasted for four days (16-19 February), with the Labour Party then officially committed to opposing the legislation. BUT, as happened with the Maastricht Bill two decades later, as Christopher Booker and Richard North observe, 'faced with the possible collapse of their Government, most of the Conservative 'anti-marketeers gritted their teeth' (treacherously, short-sighted and very foolishly -Ed.) 'and walked through the 'aye' lobby. Despite that, 15 Tories voted with the Opposition. TRAITOR

Edward Heath

 got his vote, but only by a water-thin margin:

309 to 301'.

*  *  *

 

IN 2018

 WE COULDN'T TRUST THE CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IN 1972 AND IT APPEARS WE ALSO CANNOT TRUST A CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IN 2018-THERESA MAY-BOTH WITHHELD VITAL LEGAL INFORMATION ON THE EU FROM MPs-WHICH AS IN THE PAST INDICATES A

COVER-UP.

 *  *  *

 

Tony Benn MP commented after the passage of the Third Reading that

 ‘it was a coup d’etat by a political class who did not believe in popular sovereignty’.

 

Actually, it was worse than that .\It was the start of a coup d’etat by installments’ by a corrupted political class initially led by two operatives-Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon,

 both of whom were recruited German agents  (like Lenin, Rasputin and Lavrentii Beria in the Soviet context, before them) who signed the UK Accession Treaty in exchange for corrupt payments.  Both lied to the British people; and the authors specifically identified one of Geoffrey Rippon’s worst lies, associated with the alienation of Britain’s fishing waters, the richest in the world.  Here it is worth citing the whole of the authors’ relevant paragraph:

 ‘Desperate to hide how much had been conceded[over fisheries], Geoffrey Rippon…said:

 ‘I must emphasise that these are not just transitional arrangements [in the relevant context, allegedly beneficial to the British fisheries-Ed.]

 which automatically lapse at the end of a fixed period’.  This claim drew fierce challenge from Dennis Healey and Peter Shore [later Lord Shore –further details on EDP bulletin board] both of whom suspected he was lying. 

 What neither had yet seen was the wording of the UK Accession Treaty, which MP’s would not be allowed to examine until after the treaty was signed a month later.  Only when this became available [and Heath and Rippon had accepted their bribes-Ed.]  was it clear that Rippon had told a blatant lie’. [Booker and North, op.cit., page 155]

 International Currency Review

 October 10-2005

 Notes and References:

 ‘Obituary of Sir Edward Heath, the Prime Minister who took Britain into the EEC and presided over constant turmoil at home’,

1. The Daily Telegraph, 18th July 2005.

This was probably the rudest obituary of a prominent UK statesman ever to have appeared in print.  Even so, it omitted any reference to Heath’s recruitment by German (Nazi) intelligence.   However , there are many [coded] references in this obituary, not least the three telling words:

‘He never married’, which observers accurately interpret as meaning that he was homosexual, and therefore an obvious recruitment/blackmail target.

 

2. The Daily Telegraph, 24th July 2005,

 

Christopher Booker (Column),

 

International Currency Review

 

JANUARY 6, 2019

 

A NO DEAL!

 

[A NO DEAL IS THE ONLY DEAL THAT HITLER'S SO-CALLED EU WILL RESPECT.  THOSE CALLING FOR ANY DEAL HAVE NO IDEA OF THE TRUE NATURE OF THE SATANIC BEAST THEY ARE DEALING WITH AFTER 46 YEARS.  IT'S DAYS ARE NUMBERED BECAUSE ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES CANNOT STEM THE NATURAL INSTINCT FOR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY FROM WITHIN.  THOSE CALLING FOR ANGELA MERKEL'S FRIEND THERESA MAY'S DEAL AT ANY PRICE ARE THE SAME PERSONS  WHO HAVE ALREADY SOLD THEIR SOULS TO A MONSTER STATE WHERE ONLY THE ELITE WILL PROSPER. THE MAN IN THE STREET IS IGNORED AND THAT IS WHY THERE ARE RIOTS ON THE STREETS OF MANY OF THE CAPTIVE PEOPLE'S WHO WERE DECEIVED BY THEIR NOW MASTERS. TRUE DEMOCRACY IS DEAD WITHIN HITLER'S BRAINCHILD AND IS REPLACED BY SUPPLE TOTALITARIANISM- ASK THOSE WHO ARE FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM IN CATALONIA AND NO DOUBT IN OTHER PARTS OF THE EU.]

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1150

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 OCTOBER 22,2019
 

  1. ANDREW PIERCE

  2.  

     

     

     

    Ugly truth about

     

     

     

    WHY MPs DON'T WANT

     

     

     

    TO GIVE YOU A

     

 

 

 

SAY

 

 

ON

 

 BREXIT

 

OCTOBER 22,2019

 

Since the last General Election, 51 MPs have swapped parties and for reasons of

COWARDNESS

or

STUBBORN ARROGANCE

 

have refused

 

to take the honourable path by resigning from the Commons and fighting a by-election under their new colours.

Indeed, we have witnessed the biggest number of Mps switch sides since the turmoil over Irish Home Rule in 1886. Some Mps, such as Chuka Umunna and Heidi Allen have changed parties more than once.

Perhaps it's not surprising, therefore, that with so many MPs thus dodging voters, the majority in the Commons won't accede to the Government's wishes of having a

GENERAL ELECTION.

For the truth is that if they were honest with themselves, MP's ought to have only one choice: Accept Boris Johnsons EU exit deal or face voters in a general election and account for

THEIR FAILURE TO DELIVER

BREXIT...

[TO BE CONTINUED.]

 

...The SNP has another reason for pressing for an early election. A

 

trial is scheduled in January 2020 of Alex Salmond the party's  former

 

leader.

 

 

He's accused of two counts of attempted rape, among other allegations.

 

Salmond has strenuously denied all the claims against him but the

 

.

party fears the effect of any

 

 

bad publicity

 

As for the Lib Dems, since Jo Swinson became leader, the party has

 

hardened its anti-Brexit stance from supporting a second referendum

 

to wanting to revoke Article 50-in other words,

 

 

cancelling

 

 

BREXIT.
 

Realistically, the only way this could happen is if the

Lib Dems

get a parliamentary majority -and the only way of possibly achieving

that pipe-dream is a general election.

True, the Lib Dems have been buoyed by the defection of six Mps from

Labour and the Tories taking a total to 18.

But, pollsters say the likelihood of a LIb Dem government  is just

5 per cent

This is is why, despite all their noisy rhetoric, Swinson

and her Lib Dems are pushing hard for a

SECOND REFERENDUM

as the best way to halt

BREXIT.

Also, rather than support Jeremy Corbyn as the head

, of a caretaker government, the Lib Dems would

prefer a vote of confidence in the Tories that

might lead directly to an election.

All in all, a politically motivated and cowardly coalition

of MPs are doing everything in their power to

HALT

BREXIT

-and 

prevent

  a

GENERAL ELECTION

 

*  *  *

FULL ARTICLE

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7602285/ANDREW-PIERCE-party...

 

22/10/2019 · Ugly truth about why MPs don’t want to give you a say: ANDREW PIERCE on party-switchers dodging voters to cling on to their seats By Andrew Pierce for the Daily Mail.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 22, 2019

H.F.1913

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

Daily Mail,Friday,October 18,2019-I see Arlene's fears but here's why she MUST back Boris...

*

I FEAR HE'S RIGHT.IF THE

DUP LEADERSHIP

DOES NOT NOW COMPROMISE

WITH

 BORIS JOHNSON,

UNIONISTS MAY ULTIMATELY FIND THEMSELVES PUSHED OUT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM

*

I see Arlene's fears but here's

WHY

SHE MUST BACK

BORIS

COMMENTARY by Ruth Dudley Edwards

BEFORE the 2016 referendum I like so many others, dithered about how to vote, not least because I was concerned about how BREXIT could affect the Republic of Ireland, of which I am a citizen.

I was born and brought up in Dublin but have lived in England since I was 21. I describe myself as British-Irish, am an enemy of violent Irish republicanism and have far more friends among Unionists than Nationalists.

But I was all too aware that the EU had a been a lifesaver, economically and socially for the once-impoverished Republic.

[This is why so many once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES in EUROPE sold their FREEDOM for MAMMON and who were the major finance contributors to the EU-GERMANY and BRITAIN who alternated their their rival almost annually in being the major contributor.  So Britain or more specifically the SOUTH -EAST of ENGLAND paid the Bill. Scotland also should reflect their good fortune as receiving more £,s per capita than England before she became so fond of the EU. AS observers of the political scene for over twenty years one saw how the undemocratic EU refused to accept a 'NO' in a REFERENDUM and Ireland was typical of others. It had to be a YES! And those Remainers calling for the once Parliamentary acceptance of the Referendum of June 2016 to be Null and VOID are certainly not democrats, and are more in line with a BLUEPRINT out of

NAZI GERMANY.]

What persuaded me in the end was a hard analytical look at the EU. I concluded it was utterly resistant to necessary reform and had imperialistic pretensions, while being brazenly unaccountable and increasingly scierotic. As an organisation it was shoewing every sign of being past its sell-by date.

Still I voted Leave nervously

These days, however, I would describe myself as a hardline Brexiteer.  I was appalled at the way Brussels humiliated Theresa May, and how our own Remain-leaning civil servants seemed to hinder Brexit at every turn.

We leavers have been derided as half-wits, ignorant racists and treated with utter contempt by

REMAINERS IN PARLIAMENT.

and their allies, including a disgraceful

PARTISAN SPEAKER

John Bercow, and a line-up of ex-PMs , ex ministers and assorted peers.

They were at the heart of a conspiracy with European officials to undermine the United Kingdom's attempt to

REGAIN ITS SOVEREIGNTY

SO I WANT BREXIT AND I WANT IT NOW...

 

 

...The DUP leadership has uncompromising politicians inside and outside the party snapping at its heels

. It is genuinely fearful of going under to cries of ''sell out'

 

but do they worry too much?

 

I THINK SO

 

A hard-line but pragmatic Unionist friend the following to me today:

 

Here, he said, is what I would say to the DUP. Get real! This [Brexit deal] isn't ideal, but it could put Northern Island in a terrible position as a gateway between the EU and the UK/world economy.

 

'Alas, our position in the UK is frankly shaky-the medium term outlook demographically is terrible and the DUP aren't to be the olive branch Unionism needs into RC communities and people in GB have limited patience.

 

SO IN SHORT, SHUT UP, DUP'

 

 

I fear he's right. If the DUP leadership does not now compromise with Boris Johnson, Unionists may ultimately find themselves pushed out of the

UNITED KINGDOM.

 

*

 

TO BE CONTINUED SHORTLY

 

Ruth Dudley Edwards is the author of The Faithful Tribe: an intimate Portrait of the Loyal Institutions

 

{COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

DAILY MAIL, Friday, October 18,2019

H.F.1911

 

 

 

*

 
AUGUST 23,2019
 
He's the architect of

 

 

BREXIT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 and still battling

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROJECT FEAR.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But

 

 

 

 

 

 NIGEL FARAGE

 

 

 

 

 

makes this candid admission

 

about the threat of a

 

 

 

 

 

 

NO DEAL....

*

YES, THERE

WILL BE

BUMPS IN

THE ROAD

by Nigel Farage.

 

 

RECENTLY, to my delight, I received my new British passport.  Unlike its predecessor, it requests that I should be allowed to trvel freely in my capacity as a citizen of the

UNITED KINGDOM

OF

GREAT BRITAIN

 AND NORTHERN IRELAND

 All reference to the European Union or European Community, first stamped on British passports in 1988,has been removed.

This adjustment, which the Home Office began rolling out a few month's ago, may be Theresa May's only memorable achievement from her three [wasted] years in Downing Street, but I applaud it nonetheless.

Some people-especially those who oppose Brexit-will accuse me of being a 'Little Englander' for celebrating this change.

But I happen to believe it's important  that an identity document reflects the facts, in thyis case by acknowledging in print that all British passport bearers are just that:

The significance of what is written on the cover of our passports feeds into the wider argument about Brexit itself.

oI have spent more than 25 years campaigning for the UK to leave the EU. In doing so, I have been motivated by many things, the most crucial of which is my desire for Britain to be

INDEPENDENT

AGAIN.

In other words, as far as I am concerned, the EU question has always been about something more meaningful about its impact on our economy.

We have our own flag, anthem, currency, and political and legal systems.

 MILLIONS OF PATRIOTS MADE THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE IN

TWO WORLD WARS

defending precious

FREEDOMS

championed by

 BRITAIN

 

for centuries.

As I write, it appears possible ( but only possible) that Britain may finally

ESCAPE the EU clutches on

OCTOBER 31,2019.

lderIf we do exit the bloc by the date, it is likely that we may do so

WITHOUT A DEAL.

 Some doom-mongers seem to believe that in this

NO DEAL SITUATION,

BRITAIN WOULD BE FINISHED.

EARLIER this week, a leaked Whitehall dossier, called Operation Yellowhammer, purported to highlight how Britain will be left vulnerable

WITHOUT A DEAL.

It pontificated about the return of a hard border in Ireland. It warned of shortages of fuel, medicine and food, protests, road blockades and 'direct action'-whatever that meant.

While I have never disputed that such a major disruption will inevitably lead to short-term difficulties, the contents of Operation Yellowhammer are baffling.

[The greater the cause the lighter the difficulties appear.' No pain-No gain'. All sacrifice for a greater good is a human attribute. ]

It's suggestion that the flow of our goods could be halved in the event of a

NO DEAL

BREXIT

is frankly laughable. Even the German U-boats were not as useful at lowering our levels of

TRADE!

Of course, I have always been clear that there will be bumps on the road.

But, as I have also always argued leaving the EU is about something far more important and profound than money.

On the fundamental level, it is about the self-confidence as a

NATION

to improve our quality of life-and to live that life

ON OUR OWN TERMS

[By Britain being out of the EU it will soon become apparent to those captive once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES that all they cast away which many gained by SACRIFICE and help of the UK and others will soon become apparent, as as we have often stated over the past 20 years the words of a great British Prime Minister William Pitt (1759-1806)

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, I trust, save Europe by her example.'

(9 Nov.1805-Year of Nelson's Victory at Trafalgar.)

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

  2. NIGEL FARAGE makes admission

     

     

    that there

     

     

    WILL be bumps

     

     

    in the road ..Daily Mail,Friday,August 23, 2019.
     

     

    14 hours ago · Yes, there will be bumps in the road with No Deal Brexit, admits NIGEL FARAGE - but some predictions of Project Fear and the leaked Operation Yellowhammer dossier are LAUGHABLE By Nigel Farage

 

...For too long, Brexit has been the thing which divides us as a society. In many ways this is remarkable, not least because a democratic vote was held and a clear result was achieved. (For the record, the majority was in excess of 1.25 million.)

It is up to everybody to make the best of this opportunity.

Past generations would have done so without question. And future generations will not thank you if we continue to

WASTE IT.

 

*  *  *

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

*

 

No 285

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

by

VERNON COLEMAN

A Dozen Great English Politicians Who Would Have Fought Against The Euro And The EU.

Winston Churchill

Benjamin Disraeli

William Pitt (the younger)

William Pitt (the elder)

Robert Walpole

Robert Peel

Ernest Bevin

Viscount Palmerston

Oliver Cromwell

Clement Atlee

Herbert Asquith

Stanley Baldwin.

*  *  *

LINKS to A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/

C34/B17/A1086/CON30/B404/B308

(www.vernoncoleman.com)

*  *  *

 

H.F.1891

*

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

  SEP-19

OCT-19

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-

ENGLAND FILE

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

*

A MONTH TO REMEMBER

RECLAIMING

 AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN HITLER'S PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION

 OUR

 ENGLISH FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION AND

COUNTRY.

 

MARCH 29, 2019

VICTORY

FOR

 ENGLISH FREEDOM DAY

 

 ONE SHOULD ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN WALES AND SCOTLAND PREFERRED TO REMAIN AS SLAVES WITHIN HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

IN OR OUT OF THE EU THE ENGLISH PEOPLE PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO THEIR NEIGHBOURS PARTICULARLY IN SCOTLAND WHERE THEY STILL RECEIVE A HIGHER PER CAPITA FIGURE , AS IT HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS.

A UNITED BRITISH ISLES IS A BOUNTY FOR EVERYONE IN OUR SHARED ISLAND HOME

FOR  SECURITY-TRADE-PROSPERITY AND PEACE.

LET US UNITE AND THE WORLD WILL SEE US AT OUR BEST.

OUR SHARED HISTORY IS OUR STRENGTH  AND SACRIFICE AND PURPOSE.

 

*

 

 

WHO WILL SPEAK FOR

 ENGLAND

 

 DAILY MAIL COMMENT

 

PART 1

 

TODAY the Mail asks a question of profound significance to our destiny as a sovereign nation and the fate of our children and grandchildren.

Who will speak for England?

It's a question inspired  by one of the most dramatic moments in the history of Parliamentary democracy.

The date was September 2, 1939, the day after Hitler invaded Poland. Tory PM Neville Chamberlain had just made an ambivalent statement to the House.

On his backbenches, anti-appeasement stalwart Leo Amery was incensed. As Labour's deputy leader Arthur Greenwood rose to reply for the Opposition, the Tory MP bellowed across the floor:

SPEAK FOR ENGLAND

And Greenwood did just that, voicing anger over the premier's reluctance to honour Britain's treaty obligations to Poland.  Bowing to the mood of the House, Chamberlain

DECLARED WAR ON HITLER THE NEXT DAY.

Nobody is suggesting there are any parallels whatever between the

NAZIS AND THE EU

Indeed, the Mail would argue that one of the Union's great achievements, along with NATO, has been to foster peace in Europe.

But as in 1939, we are at a crossroads in our island history. For oin perhaps as little as 20 weeks 'time, voters will be asked to decide nothing less than what sort of country we want to live in and bequeath to those who come after us.

Are we to be a self-governing nation to control our borders, strike trade agreements with whomever we choose and

DISMISS OUR RULERS AND LAWMAKERS IF THEY DISPLEASE US?

Or will our LIBERTY-SECURITY and PROSPERITY be better assured by submitting to a

STATIST-UNELECTED-BUREAUCRACY IN BRUSSELS

accepting the will of

UNACCOUNTABLE JUDGES

and linking

OUR DESTINY

with that of a sclerotic Europe that tries to achieve the impossible by uniting countries as diverse as

 GERMANY and GREECE.

For make no mistake. After the failure of Mr Cameron's renegotiations-and this week's draft deal shows there's no other word for it than

FAILURE,

since it changes

NOTHING

of any substance in our relationship with the EU

-this is the stark choice facing us in the coming REFERENDUM

For months, we have been bombarded with propaganda from one side: the side that speaks for

BRUSSELS.

In a brilliantly organised campaign,

BIG BUSINESS

UNIVERSITIES

'ELDER STATESMEN'

and the

CIVIL SERVICE

under the direction of its head,

Sir Cover-up' Jeremy Heywood-have been corralled into making the case that it would be a catastrophe if

BRITAIN left the EU.

Needless to say, their apocalyptic interventions have been zealously reported by the supposedly neutral BBC, that former champion of the disastrous EURO, which struggles for the

'OUT' camp

Meanwhile, the Conservative Party has thrown off all pretence of impartiality, proselytising for the EU in defiance of most of its rank-and-file members, who have grave doubts about Brussels.

More shamefully still, Eurosceptic ministers have been muzzled-banned from speaking on the most momentous issue of our time, even now that we know the [pathetic] terms Mr [Neville] Cameron is willing to accept'

As we report today, an edict has even gone out requiring all Cabinet ministers to filter their statements and quotes on Europe through Downing Street.

So we ask again: who will speak for England( and of course by

'England'

like Amery in 1939, we mean the whole of the United Kingdom)?

Full Article

 DAILY MAIL COMMENT

FOLLOW ON

PART 2

 

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: At last, we have voices to speak for

 ENGLAND

Earlier this month, the Mail asked on our front page:

 

WHO WILL SPEAK FOR

 ENGLAND

 

FEBRUARY 22-2016

 

    Daily Mail

     

     

     

     

    THE DOMINIC LAWSON

     

    COLUMN

     

     

     Cameron and the lie that's festered .for 45 years.

     

    HOW THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND WERE BETRAYED IN 1972 AND 1975-AND THE

     CON PARTY

    ARE STILL LYING IN 2016

     

    As Mr  Lawson has stated so aptly:

    YOUR VOTE TO LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC EU

    is to become once more a

    FREE SELF-GOVERNING COUNTRY

    and to ask the

     

    OTHERSIDE

     

    WHY ARE YOU AGAINST 

     

    'SELF GOVERNING  DEMOCRACY'

     

    YES, WHY ARE THEY?

    *

    [The LEAVE the EU Camp

    have not forgotten their world renowned inheritance of PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY of over 700 years in the making and known in the British Commonwealth and across the pond and wherever Habeus Corpus and Trial by Jury Justice is upheld as the

     

    'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen.']

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE

    OURS!]

     

    .FEBRUARY 22-2016 -

     

 

*   *   *

 

[Does not the behaviour by HERR Cameron and his hiring's  supposed democrats strike one as reminiscent of the early years of Adolf Hitler which led up to the formation of the Nazi SS. Once all views are subject to censorship under the present circumstances then we are no longer a true DEMOCRACY. As Plato states: 'Democracy passes into DESPOTISM' and the details mentioned above confirm such a declaration and all this has been brought about because since  the 1688 Revolution there has been the stark failure to heed Oliver Cromwell's clarion call for the  constitutional protection of the 

SACRED FUNDAMENTALS

OF

THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.]

PART 2-TO FOLLOW SHORTLY

*
ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

 

In 1962,

 Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality 

 HITLER'S plan for Europe

 under

 

GERMAN CONTROL.

 

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

FEBRUARY 4- 2016

H. F .700

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 
MAR-

17

 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-

18

 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-

18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 		SEP 19

OCT-19

NOV-19
BULLETINS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

 

We Germans have insulted Britain. How can we have forgotten the huge debt we owe you.

 

News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

As MARCH 29 looms closer, here in Germany, rabid anti-British sentiment is part of the daily discourse.

The chattering classes-politicians and pundits alike-are urging our Angela Merkel, to harden her line towards the United Kingdom after suggestions that she was prepared to throw Theresa May a lifeline. Indeed last week Annegret Kramp -Karrenbauer, Merkel's successor -in-waiting calls for Britain to scrap Brexit completely. Germans are far from alone in this attitude. In the wake of the momentous Commons defeat for your Prime Minister's Brexit strategy, the European Commission twisted the thumbscrews still further. have been unshakable

Michel Barnier, the EU's Brexit negotiator, suggested it was time for the EU to abandon its 'red lines' over ending freedom of movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

 Yet these issues have been unshakable stipulations for the British since the beginning of talks. To casually propose dumping them in this way is insulting to your country.

 Regret

The French president, Emmanuel Macron, was, regrettably, similarly dismissive when he said that

 Brexit

was a

BRITISH PROBLEM

and one it would have to solve on its own. Such blinkered and sour responses are, in my view, wrong-headed. They ignore the great debt that Germany, and the whole Continent, owes our friends across the Channel.

However much we in Europe regret your decision  to leave our Community, we must always remember that, throughout your history, independence and sovereignty have been

PARAMOUNT.

Germany in particular should tread lightly when it comes to dealing with

YOUR PROUD NATION.

It was Great Britain that first stood up to Hitler in 1939. And it was Britain that opened its doors to the thousands of Jew-doors to the thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing certain death during the Holocaust.

Put simply, there would be no free Europe without you and the bloody sacrifice you made to rescue the Continent. This plain fact has not always been a popular one, of course. The truth is that there has been a long tradition of policies aimed at excluding the British Isles from Europe, most notably those of French president Charles De Gaulle.

After the war, inspired by dreams of the medieval empire that stretched across  the Continent under Charlemagne, De Gaulle poured his energy into setting up the European economic Community -the forerunner of the EU.

But when Britain enquired about membership in the early Sixties, his answer was an emphatic 'Non' Thanks to De Gaulle's opposition, it took more than a decade for the UK to be accepted. And the driving force for unity for welcoming British membership with open arms was the German chancellor of the Sixties, Konrad Adenauer.

For that, ultimately, we can thank the QUEEN...

[[TREASON]

STYLE...

...Seen from that perspective it's imperative that Brexit is achieved with a degree of aplomb and decorum. At this crucial moment. Europe must concede enough to let the UK leave with head held high-and do it in style.

If instead, our leaders continue to treat the British People with contempt, we will wreck those great ties between our countries that have been painstakingly created over many generations.

 Our societies have always thrived on mutual respect and admiration. We are brothers and sisters...and this family squabble has

GONE TOO FAR

 It is time for Chancellor Merkel to show other European leaders the way and for them to start treating your country as it deserves -with our

 

RESPECT and GRATITUDE.

*  *  *

This considerable  and most erudite  yet controversial and compelling article appears at a most crucial moment, in our long island history, to recover our once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

-To be completed shortly-in the meantime for the complete work click ]

Here!

STATEMENT

In Alexander Von Schoenburg's own words' a real statesman would kindle Adenauer's historic vision of a federation [of free nation states ]and not some kind of bloated super-state-a confederation that does not neglect the historical and free peculiarities of it's members-none of this is impossible.'

This statement  appears to be that of a future GREXIT leader-don't you think?

Alexander Von Schoenburg's  mea culpa on behalf of his country has justified the 'hard-stance 'of Brexiteers particularly those such as

JACOB REES-MOGG

AND

The other 17.4 miilion who voted in JUNE 2016

TO

LEAVE THE EU

The soon to be

SUPER STATE

AS SOON AS POSSIBLE

 UKIP and the later the DAILY MAIL deserted the battleground at a vital and crucial moment which gave succour to our enemies at home and within the EU. AS a result the present shambles we now see ourselves in with only weeks until our EXIT from the BIG BROTHER EUROPEAN UNION.

*  *  *

[We were against entry to

Hitler's plan for Europe

in 1972 and again in 1975.]

[WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE]

[ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS EITHER OURS OR OTHER CONTRIBUTORS.]

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

JANUARY 24, 2019

H.F.1784

*

 
ONE THIRD OF BEAT BOBBIES AXED IN JUST THREE YEARS.

 

 

‘Plastic bobbies’ are used to investigate burglary and vandalism as cash-strapped forces ‘run out of fully-trained staff’

  • One in three beat bobbies
  • have been axed in only three
  • years, figures reveal
  • The Home Office findings come amid a
  • huge surge in violent crime 
  • They will raise fears in Whitehall that forces
  • are retreating from the front line

 

By Ian Drury Home Affairs Editor For The Daily Mail

 August 27,2018

203

View
comments

 

One in three beat bobbies have been axed in only three years amid a huge surge in violent crime.

Home Office figures reveal that more than 7,000 traditional neighbourhood police officers have been reassigned to other duties or quit since March 2015.

The findings will raise fears in Whitehall that forces are retreating from the front line, and that the days of Dixon Of Dock Green-style bobbies pounding our streets are gone for good.

 
 

One in three beat bobbies have been axed in only three years, figures reveal

The news will further harm public faith in the police at a time when officers have come under fire for failing to attend the scene of many crimes.

The fall comes amid spiralling violent crime in ‘Wild West Britain’, as highlighted by the Daily Mail.

Last month the Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed that police recorded 5.5million offences in the year to March, a rise of 45 per cent compared with 2015. Violent crime in England and Wales has almost doubled from 778,000 offences to 1.4million over the same period, while murders have increased from 539 to 736 and knife offences have soared from 26,065 to 40,147.

Senior officers have insisted that bobbies on the beat, who protect communities and gather intelligence, play a crucial role in solving crime. A more old-fashioned policing policy has seen Durham Constabulary become the best force in the country for achieving justice, with 18 per cent of crimes detected compared with 5 per cent in similar-sized forces.

Analysis of official figures by The Sunday Times found that the number of neighbourhood police officers fell from 23,928 in March 2015 to 16,557 this year, a drop of around a third.

Over the same period, the number of police community support officers, or PCSOs, has declined by around 18 per cent from 12,370 to 10,139.

Police officer numbers have dropped from around 143,700 in March 2010, a few weeks before the Tory-led coalition won power, to 122,400 this March.

Lord Stevens, the former Scotland Yard commissioner, said the figures were ‘incredibly alarming’, adding that public confidence in the police was linked to ‘officers on the street in uniform’.

Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Sir Ed Davey said: ‘This looks like the death of the traditional beat bobby by stealth.’

The Home Office insists that 92 per cent of officers are ‘front-line’ but they include more than 40,000 in ‘non-visible’ roles such as office-bound intelligence analysts, custody officers and operational support officers and nearly 9,000 in other support roles.

The Government says it has protected overall police budgets in real terms since the 2015 spending review. Despite this, Home Secretary Sajid Javid has acknowledged pressures and pledged to fight for more money.

A Home Office spokesman said: ‘Forces are changing how they deliver local policing so that they can respond better to the changing nature of crime. They recognise effective community engagement is more than just having a visible police presence.

‘Most have already set out plans to either protect or increase front-line policing this year.’

 
 

The forces using PCSOs to investigate burglaries

Police forces are using PCSOs to investigate crimes including burglary and vandalism as they ‘run out’ of fully trained staff.

Senior officers at more than a third of forces are directing the civilian officers to respond to calls for help from the public.

The police and community support officers, who do not have powers of arrest, are expected to pass inquiries on to detectives if they become more complex.

PCSOs, nicknamed ‘plastic policemen’ by their detractors, have been investigating burglaries in the West Midlands, Hertfordshire, Surrey, Northamptonshire, Lincolnshire and Cleveland.

One PCSO published CCTV footage of an intruder caught on camera at a social club in Aldenham, Hertfordshire.

 

Police forces are now using PCSOs to investigate crimes including burglary and vandalism

In Surrey, a PCSO urged residents to be vigilant after three break-ins at properties in Banstead and Hooley. In Lincolnshire a PCSO asked for help to solve a shed burglary and damage to a nearby fence.

Simon Kempton, of the Police Federation, which represents rank and file police officers, said: ‘This is policing on the cheap. Chief constables are simply running out of properly trained people to send to jobs.’

HM Inspectorate of Constabulary has criticised chief constables for failing to provide adequate training for PCSOs’ expanded responsibilities.

Hertfordshire Police said regular police officers, special constables, civilian investigators and PCSOs ‘all have a valuable role in offering a reassuring presence to the public [and] helping to fight crime and anti-social behaviour’.

 

Advertisement

‘Plastic bobbies’ are used to investigate burglary and vandalism

‘Plastic bobbies’ are used to investigate burglary and vandalism as cash-strapped forces ‘run out of fully-trained staff’

By Ian Drury Home Affairs Editor For The Daily Mail

 August 27,2018

 

H.F.1663

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

A CONSERVATIVE PARTY

PROMISES TO GET TOUGH ON LAW AND ORDER

IN

OCTOBER 2019

WHAT ARE ITS CHANCES

NILL

The DECADES LONG AWAITED CONSERVATIVE HARD-LINE POLICY

ON

LAW & ORDER

DEPENDS ON MORE PRISON SPACE

IN SIMPLE WORDS

MORE PRISONS

Because all the promises will avail

NOTHING

if there is no more prison space to hold the expected much increased number of

OFFENDERS

expected with the much increased number of offenders with their long belated no nonsense plan to increase the

Bobbies -on-the- Beat

and

the tougher sentencing for criminals who have played the system for too long to a stage that so called secure prisons are now in competition with Hilton and other majors hostellers with their good fare and comfort. The criminals have played the system for too long. Open Prisons should be secure prisons, and life in prison should not resemble a holiday camp, but time put to good affect to change the attitude of offenders for their good - but more importantly for the good of the law-abiding citizen in the community.

[See  the following article by Philip Davies MP.]

OCTOBER 6,2019

 

*

 

 

MAY-2015

  1. Beat Bobbies are dying out,

     

    warn police:

     

     

    Leaders say ...

     

    - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Police-leaders-say-officers-endangered-budget-cuts- hit.html

    By James Slack and Arthur Martin for the Daily Mail. Published: 18:03 EST, 19
    May 2015 | Updated: 18:04 EST, 19 May 2015. View comments. Bobbies on the ...
      

     

    [OVER THE PAST DECADE AND LONGER WE HAVE SHOWN MANY ARTICLES FROM THE DAILY MAIL ON THIS IMPORTANT AND VITAL SUBJECT OF THE LOSS OF THE BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT. AND ITS AFFECT ON THE GENERAL POPULATION BUT PARTICULARLY  ON THE GROWING OLDER POPULATION.  BUT WE HAVE ALSO STATED THE IMPORTANCE OF THE BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT IN A NATIONAL EMERGENCY BEING FELLOW CITIZENS AND PART OF THE COMMUNITY WHICH SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE COMPLETELY  IGNORED.-MAY 2015 ]

H.F.1896

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 
 
2018-12-31

 

If we all push, 2019 will see final victory against the Khazarian mafia

By  White Dragon Society  9 Comments
Many signs indicate that 2019 will be a breakthrough year in the battle against the satan-worshiping Khazarian mafia.  Not only have mass arrests begun, but the mass-murdering part of the pharmacidical/medical establishment is finally being taken out as well.  Another obvious sign it is no longer business as usual comes from the fact that the U.S. military is being withdrawn from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.  And this time the U.S. government shutdown may actually result in formal bankruptcy procedures against the illegal corporate government that has occupied Washington, D.C. since 1871.

Let’s start with the U.S. military withdrawals, since they mark one of the biggest changes seen since the end of World War II when the perpetual war economy of the U.S. military-industrial complex began.  Pentagon sources say U.S. President Donald Trump’s Christmas Day visit to Iraq portends a pull-out from that country.  This follows withdrawal announcements from Afghanistan and Syria, as well as a ceasefire in Yemen.  We also note that almost all of the U.S. carrier groups are now at rest in their home ports.

Even more dramatically, the sources say, “Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan’s mission will be [to bring out in public view the] space force, bring troops home, release extraterrestrial and suppressed technology, close overseas bases, beat swords into plowshares and cut waste, while building a more lethal military.”  This means peace on earth and goodwill to all in a very real sense this holiday season.

The Pentagon sources also say the long U.S. government shutdown “makes it easy to arrest Deep-Staters embedded in the government.”  Furthermore, the first senior official to be publicly tried in “Nuremburg 2.0 will be ….
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-12-24

Western civilization heading for a reboot over the holidays

By  Weekly Reports  264 Comments
Many signs and confirmations from highly placed sources indicate that a reboot of Western civilization is being planned for 2019.  The shutdown of the U.S. government over the holidays, for example, has nothing to do with building a wall, and everything to do with a financial reboot and upcoming military tribunals.

However, what is coming is about much more than just rounding up the criminals who hijacked and bankrupted the U.S. government—it is about fixing the problems besetting monotheism.

Since today is December 24th, Christmas Eve, it’s a good time to remind people of the historical truth behind this holiday.  The fact is that nobody knows when Jesus Christ was born, so the early Christian church hijacked the old solar New Year holiday and replaced the sun with Jesus.  Here’s the thing:  the sun sets at its most northern point on December 21st, the winter solstice.  For three days afterwards, it appears to set at the same place, and then on December 25th it starts setting further south, marking the birth of the solar New Year.  Thus, the Christian church needs to confess and tell people the truth about Christmas without in any way denying the wonderful teachings of Jesus Christ and Christianity.

The Jews, for their part, need to stop celebrating the xenophobic Hanukkah and realize that it is perfectly kosher to celebrate the solar New Year (unless they somehow think the Creator did not make the sun).  Anyway, Merry Christmas to the Christians and Muslims, and Merry Sunmas to everybody else.

These issues, together with discussions of updating the calendars to bring them back into line with the movements of the heavens on which they are based, are going to be part of a broad public discourse in the New Year.  That is because, at the highest levels of world power, a decision has been made to go ahead and rebuild the temple in Jerusalem and turn that city into an international free zone.  This is why 2019 is likely to be a year for the history books.

In preparation for these upcoming historical changes, U.S. troops are being withdrawn from various conflict zones in order to pave the way for world peace, CIA sources say.  Pentagon sources agree, adding that “U.S. President Donald Trump is pulling out of Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, and the Ukraine to terminate the Deep State and the Zionists, since the global currency reset requires peace and cessation of hostilities.”

European royal family sources concur that preparations are under way for a reboot of the global financial system.  The current U.S. dollar, Euro, and Japanese yen-based system is bankrupt and dysfunctional, these and other sources agree.  This is especially true of the United States, which has been bankrupt for quite some time now, the sources say.  That’s why this current U.S. government shutdown is going to lead to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-12-17

Secret head of world finance, Cardinal Pell, fired and big changes coming

By  Weekly Reports, White Dragon Society  337 Comments
Last week Cardinal George Pell was found guilty of sexually abusing children by an Australian court and was subsequently fired by Pope Francis because he was “elderly.”
 https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/12/12/cardinal-pell-top-advisor-pope-francis-found-guilty-historical-sexual-offenses

This is huge news in the secret world of finance, because Pell was the person in charge of financial matters at the Vatican and thus was a secret controller of most world government leaders, P2 Freemason and CIA sources say.  This is because when most world rulers take power, they get a visit from an official of the Vatican Bank who hands them a bank book with an astronomical number written in it (a billion dollars or more for big countries;  less for smaller countries).  They are then told, “Welcome to the world of the rich,” and are gently reminded that if they refuse to accept the money they will be “removed.”

This is the choice of silver or lead that has allowed the Vatican P2 Freemason Lodge, run by descendants of the Caesars, to secretly rule most world governments.  The 200 leaders who last week affirmed the fraudulent “carbon causes global warming” agreement are all slaves of this system, P2 Freemason and CIA sources agree.
 https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/12/14/18139402/cop24-climate-change-katowice-poland

Thus, the removal of the head of this secret control system will have huge repercussions for world finance and politics, depending on who is selected to replace him, and also depending on whether or not this secret system will be allowed to continue.

On that front, another huge news item (still not fully confirmed because it only comes from one royal family source) is that a new head of the Committee of 300, the secret government of the 13 ruling bloodline families, will take power next year.  This means Queen Elizabeth will be handing the committee reins to a younger person (hint:  not Charles and not William).

With this caveat in mind (i.e., only one source), here some excerpts from a statement by the soon-to-be-appointed new committee head:  “The 13 ruling bloodlines and I have had enough of this world and the minions charged with its curation.  All Sovereign Heads of State and all respective governments fired.  Ordo ab Chao.”

The source also said, “Sir Alexander Younger at MI6 is already briefed, along with the Queen in London and the Emperor in Tokyo,” about this development.

The statement further read that, “The Habsburg dynasty and spin-offs—most criminally psychopathic—have …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-12-13

Previous JCS Chairman

By  Letters to the Editor  0 Comments
Ben:  Enjoy your weekly newsletters and I put more credence in you than any other source.  I’m curious about your comment in last newsletter, “as the previous JCS Chairman was Army.”  I believe you’ll find that Gen. Joseph Dunford was a United States Marine.  Means a lot to us former active duty Marines!  Have a great day.
I was referring to his predecessor Mike Dempsey, since Dunford is still JCS Chairman for now.
–BF

 

 
2018-12-31

*  *  *

ADDED

[FIND OUT MORE OF YOUR WORLD WHICH WILL SHOCK

YOU.]

 

H.F.1769

 

*  *  *

 

A REMINDER OF OUR CAPTIVITY WITHIN HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

*
LITTLEJOHN

 

 As Marx said, history does have the ... A Very British Coup revolved around a conspiracy by the military, the media, big business and M15...

 

 

So this is what a very British coup looks like.

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

SOME of you will recall the novel

A Very British Coup,

subsequently made into an award-winning television series on Channel 4.

It was written by Labour MP Chris Mullin, published in 1982, and revolved around a conspiracy by the

MILITARY-THE MEDIA-BIG BUSINESS-M15

to bring down a Left-wing government.

At the time, the plot was entirely credible, since Britain was riven by strikes and revolution was in the air. I read the book as a young labour and industrial correspondent, and it made sense to me.

 The Bennites were in the ascendancy, Margaret Thatcher was horribly unpopular and it looked as if the wizened Hampstead Leftie Michael Foot-Worzel Gummidge, as Private Eye dubbed him-would be our next Prime Minister.

Mullin's assumptions were based  on hard fact. In the Seventies there had been well-founded reports about the Establishment plot to depose Labour's Harold Wilson.

In some quarters, there were even rumblings of a military coup.

A couple of years ago, when the un reconstructed Bennite Jeremy Corbyn became leader, Mullen talked about writing a sequel. He imagined the Funny  People orchestrating a putsch to thwart a democratically elected Corbyn government.

Trouble is, history has a habit of not working out as you expect. Although, as Marx said, history does have the capacity to repeat itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. That's where we are right now. Except tragedy and farce are running in tandem.

WE are in the middle of

A VERY BRITISH COUP

but not as Mullin predicted. What we're seeing is an elaborate, well-financed and coordinated plot to overturn as extreme Left-wing Prime Minister

BUT

the democratically expressed will of the British people.

It's being mounted by the Government of the day, aided and abetted by Big Business and the Civil Service.

[A repeat of 1970's-again by a supposed Conservative Government.]

 

THIS is A  Very BRITISH Coup, only written by Lewis Carroll not Chris Mullin. In our new Looking Glass World, words mean-as Humpty Dumpty declared-whatever they want them to mean.

Thus the dwindling band of MPs sticking uo for the

17.4 MILLION who voted

LEAVE

are condemned as plotters and rebels

Those, including Theresa May, who are doing everything in their power to

PREVENT

BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU

and becoming once again a

PROUD SOVEREIGN NATION

are hailed absurdedly as true patriots

As I've said often enough, just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

About the only thing upon which I've ever agreed with Ken Livingstone - apart from cheap Tube fares - was when he wrote a book called

If Voting Changed Anything They'd Abolish it. The Establishment seems hell-bent on proving him

Right over Brexit .

[The EDP has over decades seen much evidence of this very fact and though continually bringing evidence to the surface nobody appears to be interested whether it is lack of Bobbies -on-the beat - Health Service in crisis-Pot-holes-closed Police Stations...Britons on worst State Pensions in the Europe-even Portugal is marginally more. And a bloated -wasteful and grotesque so-called FOREIGN AID which even some regimes as recipients have requested to be stopped .

I told  you the day after the referendum that the fix was already in . Now they're on the final furlongs

We're being informed, in no uncertain fashion that

OUR VOTES ARE WORTHLESS

that they don't count.

WE'RE TOO IGNORANT, TOO UNEDUCATED, TOO RACIST

To be taken seriously.

Politicians who try to square the circle are vilified.

One minute Dominic Raab, who attempted to make a go of being Brexit Secretary, is a principled pragmatic operator of the highest praise.

The next, when he is forced to resign because Mother Theresa has deliberately undermined his position and then lied about it, he's dismissed as a disloyal traitor. And If I hear anyone else demanding a second

'People's Vote'

I'll scream.

All they want to do is reverse the referendum result or give us three options so they can split the

LEAVE VOTE

To be honest, I can't take much more of this patronising guff. The Beeb's idea of discerning commentators these days seems to extend no further than 'Baroness' Shameless Chuckabutty, Potty Toynbee and Mad Alastair Campbell, the author of the dodgy dossier which took into an

ILLEGAL WAR IN IRAQ.

 

As I believe I may have observed before. Campbell is the only bloke I know with a certificate to prove he's sane.

And don't get me started on the CBI which throughout my career has been wrong about everything from joining the euro to the Thatcher reforms. The CBI speaks only for monopolistic, multinational megacorps, not the small-to-medium businesses which are the backbone of our economy and always get the rough end  of the pineapple from Brussels - even though they don't sell so much as a brass washer outside British borders.

Twenty-five-odd years ago, covering a CBI conference in Glasgow, I watched the chairman of Dunlop taking the stage wearing a kilt and waving a Union Jack, as part of an I'm Backing Britain campaign. The following week he sold the company to the Japanese.

These are the same people bnow claiming to have British interests at the heart of their determination to

KEEP US SHACKLED TO THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC EU

The final straw came when the arrogant Amber Rudd was restored to Government over the weekend and immediately demanded loyalty and unity around Mrs May's 'deal'.  Her commitment to 'loyalty' hasn't stopped her trashing Cabinet colleagues in the past.

This fanatically pro-EU women who oozes an inter-galactic sense of  entitledment from every pore, is the sister of the PR spiv Roland Rudd, who is paid a small fortune to run

PROJECT FEAR

on behalf of his well-healed clients.

Just imagine if one of Boris's siblings was cashing in on

BREXIT.

The calls from Remainers for the police to investigate would be deafening. By Sunday, I'd had enough and reached the point where I came over all Tom Robinson.

I've given up reading the papers,

I've given up watching TV.

 

LOOK, I repeat, for those of you who missed it the first time round, even tungsten-tipped hard Brexiteers like me accept there will have to be some concessions if we're going to escape from the EU straitjacket.

And I do think the prospect of a Marxist Corbynista government is too horrible to contemplate.

But I also believe its 1992 all over again. This is Mother Theresa's

BLACK WEDNESDAY

MOMENT

WHATEVER HAPPENS NEXT

THE TORIES

ARE SHOT TO PIECES.

All trust and confidence in them has drained away and we're looking at a Labour government by default whenever the next election is called

Most of the 17.4 million who believe they have been betrayed will simply stay at home, or drift back to Labour. Democracy will be the ultimate casualty of this shabby debacle.

The pathetic defeatest dog's breakfast of an agreement

 which Mother Theresa is trying to force down our throats isn't worthy of the description 'deal'.

It is a monstrous capitulation and will be etched on her political gravestone, even if she does manage to get it, or a version thereof, through Parliament.

Where do we go from here?

I haven't a clue.

But at least we now know exactly

what a

Very British Coup

LOOKS LIKE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 20,2018

H.F.1747

*

 
 

 

How Britain is ruled by patronising

 

 

 

B*#*@:rds

 by QUENTIN LETTS

 

A rebellion has taken place in this country of ours, an uprising, a new Peasants’ Revolt. A real kick in the kidneys for Britain’s ruling elite.

Before the EU referendum in 2016, the electorate was told firmly what to do. A vote for Remain would be safe and strong, and woe betide the country if you were stupid enough to back Brexit. You know your duty, little ones, said the elite. Sod that, said the people.

In the greatest citadel-storming since the French Revolution, they chose to leave the obtrusive European Union.

But it was not a result that happened by accident. It was born of a weary truculence — a yeoman impatience with those who make up our smug, self-perpetuating, invisible Brahmin caste.

Before the EU referendum in 2016, the electorate was told firmly what to do. A vote for Remain would be safe and strong, and woe betide the country if you were stupid enough to back Brexit. You know your duty, little ones, said the elite. Sod that, said the people

The government machine was used remorselessly to help Remain. We were muck-spreadered with warnings of hideous consequences from Brexit. The Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, was mobilised. His friend George Osborne was Chancellor and, so far as the two of them could see, Remain was bound to win, and Clever George would become prime minister before the next general election

For decades, Britons have been bossed about by a cadre of administrators and managers and pose-striking know-alls.

The old aristocracy having faded, in came a more furtive elite, driven by the desire to own minds, not acres, determined to control opinion and dictate our attitudes.

It was done on the sly, of course. They posed as liberals, and crouched behind ‘enlightened’ attitudes while imposing their views on a populace they claimed to esteem but more truthfully disdained.

 

Politicians, civil servants and lawyers used a language few could understand, while government was farmed out to agencies and quangos and privatised supply companies.

Cheap labour was imported, suppressing workers’ wages, because that was what globalised boss-cats at the international forums said was necessary.

Could we criticise immigration? Only if we wanted to be called racists and fruitcakes. The elite’s media munchkins had placed it on the top shelf, somewhere safe where it could not be touched.
 

At the gates to the Palace of Westminster I bumped into pro-Leave Tory MP Kwasi Kwarteng, a great bear of a man. ‘This is bigger than any general election result,’ he boomed

Against our will, children were exposed to sex education by schools more interested in dogma than declension. Sex crimes rocketed.

Sociologists said murderers must be released into the community. Re-offending rates rose.

Smokers were made to feel like criminals. Criminals were encouraged to sue their victims.

From every side came instruction as to what we must think: about diet, gender, sexuality, race, even the weather, with the TV forecasters telling us to put on sun cream and giving silly names to every incoming squall.

The entire System was at it, badgering us, belittling us, patting us on the head, putting us in our place.

Think this. Don’t think that. Inappropriate! Hate-crime!

From the Chief Medical Officer and her strictures about alcohol limits to railway announcements saying ‘do not become a victim of crime’, they treat us like toddlers.

Even the most docile beach donkey, by nature placid and reliable, if repeatedly kicked, will eventually refuse to co-operate. It will bare its teeth and walk in the other direction, pulling its tethers out of the sand.

So it has proved with the British voters.

Get off our backs, they said. Stop goading us. Stop being such patronising bastards.

The morning we discovered we’d break free from Europe was that unforgettable Friday, June 24, 2016.

Everywhere, celebrity luvvies hyperventilated. Actress Amanda Abbington (she was Dr Watson’s wife in Sherlock on the telly) messaged: ‘Watch the collapse begin. Dark days . . . Where can I move me and my children too (sic)? Where’s nice? Italy? Canada?’ They might have better grammar there, certainly. Keira Knightley was foul-mouthed. ‘Stop others f***ing with your future,’ she bleated in a message to yoof

I was in a pokey hotel bedroom in London’s Bloomsbury and awoke at daybreak as the television relayed the referendum results from around the country.

I’d expected the technocracy was going to win. It always did, didn’t it? The experts had said defeat for Remain was unthinkable. Treasury officials, opinion pollsters and almost the entire diplomatic corps idly presumed Remain would win.

But it hadn’t.

Our dominating elite of parliamentarians, lobbyists, bankers, artists, political theorists, clergy, academics and sterile aesthetes was about to take a massive custard pie smack in the face.

So many well-connected people had scoffed at Brexit. They had belittled anyone who suggested it could occur.

But there it was, happening before our eyes as the BBC’s presenter, David Dimbleby, announced: ‘The British people have spoken and the answer is “we’re out!”.’

The cold print of the referendum ballot papers had merely asked voters if they wanted to stay in the EU. This result was the crystallisation of something bigger.

It was the eruption of a long-building resentment at being bossed around by an opaque snootocracy, by affluent fixers and the People Who Know Best.
 

James Corden, who left Britain to present a TV show in California, transmitted from across the water: ‘I’m so sorry to the youth of Britain. I feel you’ve been let down today. x’

In my hotel room on that Independence Dawn last year, I felt a giddying rush of patriotic pride. The apple-cart had been overturned.

This was not just a public rejection of the EU. It was an act of thrilling dissent. Our arrogant elite, after years of self-enriching condescension, had been whupped.

More than a year on, I still can’t get out of my head how unrelenting the campaign was for Remain to win the popular vote.

For months before the referendum, the System did its best to engineer things in favour of the EU.

Cabinet Brexiteers were silenced. Civil servants were told to hide sensitive EU material from Eurosceptic ministers.

The government machine was used remorselessly to help Remain. We were muck-spreadered with warnings of hideous consequences from Brexit. The Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, was mobilised.

His friend George Osborne was Chancellor and, so far as the two of them could see, Remain was bound to win, and Clever George would become prime minister before the next general election.

Carney, a Canadian but bound to the status quo here by instinct and career, predicted Brexit would cause sterling to collapse, growth to stall and unemployment to rise.

From comedians to bishops (hard to say which of those two groups is funnier), fund managers to charity-sector tsars, Brexit was as pongy as a bad sardine. They did not just oppose it. They recoiled from it.

The reaction was not simply intellectual or even political. It was rooted in taste, aesth- etics, manners.

Let your future son-in-law have tombstone teeth, the clothes sense of Ken Dodd and a string of shoplifting offences to his name, but pray God Almighty he be not a Brexiteer.

We no longer have widowed duchesses who clutch their dewlaps in horror when they hear the word ‘serviette’, but Brexit had the same effect on managerial and technocratic types.

My wife, a sweet and liberal-minded soul, casually mentioned to a princeling of the Church of England that she intended to vote Leave. He gasped: ‘How could you?’ He might have been less aghast had she admitted to witchcraft.
 

From J. K. Rowling came: ‘I don’t think I’ve ever wanted magic more’

Fashionable ‘opinion leaders’ and pliable industrialists were pressed to the Remain cause to build the idea that superior people — good people — were of one accord. They crouched down beside the voters, looked them very gravely in the eye and told the boys and girls that Mummy and Daddy would be really, really sad if Remain did not win the referendum.

Opinion pollsters said Remain would win, and in the last week of the campaign the Cameroons started to strut.

Two days before the referendum, Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee, la-di-dah Leftist and one-time owner of the most perfect villa in Italy, opined that the result was in the bag. The headline over her article read: ‘On Friday I’ll get my country back. Britain will vote Remain’.

But the voters came to a different conclusion. They decided that those prominent Remain supporters were only in it for themselves, chasing either business contracts or honours.

The Leavers were the ones who reclaimed their country. On the morning after the referendum, I headed from my hotel to work in a taxi whose driver was cock-a-hoop at the Leave vote. At the gates to the Palace of Westminster I bumped into pro-Leave Tory MP Kwasi Kwarteng, a great bear of a man. ‘This is bigger than any general election result,’ he boomed. He was right. General elections are elections for Parliament. The referendum was an election against Parliament, in spite of Parliament.

Abraham Lincoln once spoke of ‘government of the people, by the people, for the people’. We had drifted towards ‘government of the people, by the Parliament, for the Parliament and its fleas’.

The Establishment reacted with petulant disbelief.

Tony Blair called it ‘a foolish excursion into populism’. The then Lib Dem leader Tim Farron, 46, normally a sunny fellow, was ‘angry that today we wake to a deeply divided country’. Would he have said the same if the scores had gone the other way?

Everywhere, celebrity luvvies hyperventilated.

Actress Amanda Abbington (she was Dr Watson’s wife in Sherlock on the telly) messaged: ‘Watch the collapse begin. Dark days . . . Where can I move me and my children too (sic)? Where’s nice? Italy? Canada?’ They might have better grammar there, certainly. 

Keira Knightley was foul-mouthed. ‘Stop others f***ing with your future,’ she bleated in a message to yoof. James Corden, who left Britain to present a TV show in California, transmitted from across the water: ‘I’m so sorry to the youth of Britain. I feel you’ve been let down today. x.’

From J. K. Rowling came: ‘I don’t think I’ve ever wanted magic more.’ TV presenter and sometime footballer Gary Lineker asked: ‘What have we gone and done?’

The mood at Glastonbury pop festival was funereal. Coldplay’s Chris Martin saw ‘the collapse of a country’. Damon Albarn wore a black armband.

Marianne Faithfull, famous because decades earlier she was supposed to have done something filthy with a Mars Bar and Mick Jagger, said: ‘We are back to where it used to be, the Right-wing racist Little England. Those dreadful people, they’ve always been there.’

TV presenter and sometime footballer Gary Lineker asked: ‘What have we gone and done?’ The mood at Glastonbury pop festival was funereal. Coldplay’s Chris Martin saw ‘the collapse of a country’

Emma Thompson, mother, director, writer, actress, intellectual, citizen, was, naturally, appalled by Brexit. She said she felt more European than English and she regarded Ukip’s Nigel Farage as a ‘white nationalist’.

Where that left the many non-white Leave voters and non-white Ukip supporters, it was hard to say.

The Remain camp united atheists and the modern Church of England, with former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and arch-atheist Richard Dawkins deploring the result. Science bod Dawkins, who has made a study of natural selection, raged that the voters had been ‘ill-informed’ and ‘ignorant’. Personally, I blame evolution.

Another secularist, A. C. Grayling, wrote to MPs demanding that they reject the will of the people who, said Grayling, had voted on the basis of ‘demagoguery and sentiment’.

Too many voters were merely ‘System One’ thinkers, he argued — i.e. they acted chiefly on impulse and could be ‘captured by slogans’, unlike ‘System Two’ thinkers who made more considered, logical judgments.

Shades here, of the Greek philosopher Plato, who regarded democracy as rule by the rabble and proposed the creation of elite ‘Guardians’ or ‘Philosopher Kings’ who could be selected in youth and trained to rule.

Plato’s thinking is most clearly seen today in the French grandes écoles that train the cadre of Brussels Eurocrats who propose and draft EU treaties.

Tony Blair made a speech calling on people to ‘rise up against’ ... er, themselves, basically.

Time and again it was argued by anti-Brexiteers that Leave voters did not understand the vastness of their decision.

The elite was indignant and fearful — and that only made many Leave voters all the more certain they had made the right decision.

In their appalling condescension, what all these furious anti-Brexiteers ignored were people such as a Derbyshire factory worker called Stuart Carrington and the other 17,410,741 men and women who had voted to Leave.

Stuart had also been on my mind that anxious night as we waited for the referendum result. He was my brother-in-law. (Well, as good as. He and my wife’s sister Nicky were not formally married but they had been together years.)

Fifty-four-year-old Stuart’s health had become a worry in recent months. Out of character, he took time off work. Stuart’s machine, capable of the most intricate measurements, checked parts for aircraft jet engines.

He was proud of his work, just as he was proud of Nicky, her two sons and their flat. But he knew all that was coming to an end.

The doctors initially told him he had a low-threat cancer but they changed their prognosis. That week we were told he was dying.

Yet on referendum day morning, moving with difficulty, he had managed to get himself to his local polling station in the Spital district of Chesterfield, to vote for the last time.

A gaunt figure, he leaned heavily on the stubby pencil while casting his vote. Job done, he carefully dropped his ballot into the box, thanked the officials, winced a little and made slowly for the door.

A keen supporter of Leave — and normally a Labour man, his dad having been a miner — Stuart had been determined to vote and he had bloody well managed it.

I kept thinking of stoical, taciturn Stuart.

Those northern men don’t always say much but by God they make their mark. Stuart was not a showy person. He did not consider himself important, not in the way we normally use that term.

Not back then. Maybe things are a little different now. Maybe, with Brexit, the balance of power has shifted a little.

Maybe, but I wouldn’t bank on it.

As I will show in the rest of this series based on my new book, the patronising bastards are everywhere, lording it over the plebs, putting us in our place, waving their entitlement in our face, telling us what to think and what to do.

And not just over Brexit but on every issue under the sun.

And the biggest ‘bastard’ of them all, at the very top of my list of patricians treating the rest of us with contempt? I’ll reveal his identity on Monday.

Adapted from Patronising Bastards: How The Elites Betrayed Britain, by Quentin Letts, published by Constable on October 12 at £16.99. © Quentin Letts 2017. To order a copy for £13.59 (offer valid to October 14, 2017) visit www.mailshop.co.uk/books or call 0844 571 0640. P&P is free on orders over £15.


 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4957180/Britain-s-ruled-patronising-b-rds-says-QUENTIN-LETTS.html#ixzz4uqBaZlGZ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

 

6/10/17

 

 

H.F.1338 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT A SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU.

*
 

Don't Give In To The E U

 

WHY A UK COMPROMISE WITH BRUSSELS WILL CONFINE THEIR CAPTIVE NATION STATES EVEN TIGHTER TO ENSURE THERE CAN BE NO MORE DEFECTORS. WHILE A FIRM RESPONSE FOR A JUST SETTLEMENT FROM THE UK WILL GIVE HEART AND ASSISTANCE TO THOSE FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOTS PRISONERS OF HITLER'S PLANNED EU TO BAND TOGETHER TO FIGHT FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

WE SAY NO! TO COMPROMISE.

It is forgotten that an individual country which makes a decision affecting itself or others has the opportunity to remedy the situation. Whereas, in the EU this is not possible, unless ALL or the permitted number agree to the change and knowing the belligerence of Hitler's brainchild this could have serious and dangerous consequences.

Remember, the responsibility of the UK to assist those captive people's who wish to be

FREE

because it was the blood of British troops in the past that assisted the birth of many of the

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES in EUROPE.

BY STANDING FIRM FOR AN ORDERLY AND JUST EXIT FROM HITLER'S EU WE WILL RECOVER THAT RESPECT THAT OUR BROTHER NATIONS WHO SAW BRITAIN IN 1973 NEGLECT THEIR KIN AROUND THE WORLD FOR AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE WITH A COUNTRY

GERMANY

WHICH IN

TWO WORLD WARS

WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS  AND INJURIES OF MILLIONS AND VAST DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY...FOR WHICH THE LIKE THE WORLD WOULD NOT HAVE  PREVIOUSLY SEEN.

A FREE INDEPENDENT EUROPEAN UNION OF FREE PEOPLE'S WITHIN THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

YES!

THE PRESENT UNDEMOCRATIC-UNREPRESENTATIVE-BULLYING EU.

NO!

The fault of our present situation is because of TREASON within the Tory Government of

Edward Heath

 A Nazi spy since 1938 reported to MI5 in 1938 by the Master of Balliol College, Oxford.

 Who in the 70's  and with previous administrations secretly conspired to lead the British people blindfolded into the Nazi-planned EU . It is therefore incumbent on the present Tory Government of Mrs May to bring the situation back to what it was before January 1973. The evidence of Tory wrong-doing has been on our website since 2005.

*

Compromise.

Compromise is but the sacrifice of one right or good in the hope of retaining another,-too often ending in the loss of both,

- Tryon Edwards

*

From the beginning of our history the country has been afflicted with compromise. It is by compromise that human rights have been abandoned. I insist that this shall cease. The country needs repose after all its trials; it deserves repose. And repose can only be found in everlasting principles.-

Charles Sumner

*

A surrender to the Nazi-planned EU would not bring repose to the millions of patriots who wanted their country back. An unjust settlement instead of a Churchillian response will see the battle continue until victory is secured.

Victory

You ask, What is our aim?  I can answer in one word: Victory - victory at all costs, victory in spite of all the terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival.

- Winston Churchill.

FOR THE MILLIONS WHO HAVE DIED IN THE PAST FOR THEIR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND THEIR CAN BE NO SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED UNDEMOCRATIC CAPTIVE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

*  *  *
THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

 HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

 WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

*

[THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID

NOTHING!]

 

 

 

 

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 
 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

THIS COULD BE THE TIME FOR THOSE    MP'S in the SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY  OR OTHERS TO FORM THEIR OWN PATRIOTIC PARTY OF THE CENTRE. TO ATTRACT ALL VOTERS WHO LOVE  THEIR COUNTRY AND UNIQUE -PRIZED CONSTITUTION. WHO WANT IT BACK AS IT STOOD BEFORE JANUARY,1973.

Rees-Mogg-Borris Johnson... TO LEAD THE WAY!

THE EDP WOULD OFFER ITS NAME AND WITHDRAW FROM THE POLITICAL SCENE TO SUCH PATRIOTIC INDIVIDUALS AND AT THE LEAST WOULD SUPPORT SUCH A PARTY.

IN PARLIAMENT WE FIND THERE ARE LOBBY GROUPS SUCH AS FRIENDS OF WHO EVER BUT THERE ARE NO FRIENDS OF ENGLAND .IT IS ABOUT TIME THERE IS A PATRIOTIC BLOCK TO STAND UP FOR ENGLAND AND ITS PAST AND FUTURE. WE HAVE BEEN WAITING TOO LONG FOR A RETURN OF OUR ENGLISH PARLIAMENT - IS LONG OVERDUE.

LETS DO IT!

*  *  *

'Destroy [her] fib or sophestry. in vain

The creature's at [her] dirty work again.'

Pope

*

A CALL TO ARMS!

 

'Awake, arise, or be for ever fallen,'

John Milton

[before the Beast of Europe.]

*

'Blest Isle, with matchless beauty crowned

And manly hearts to guard the fair:-

Rule Britannia! rule the waves!

Britons never will be slaves!'

J.THOMSON

[ With a Greater Remainer vote in Wales and Scotland the above verse is no more true,]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

NOVEMBER 14, 2018

H.F.1627

*  *  *
LITTLEJOHN

 

The Living Dead

AND

The Joy of Brexit

DAILY MAIL- RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: The Joy of

Brexit

 

NOVEMBER 13,2018

 

JUST when you thought the Brexit debacle couldn't get any worse, the crypt door creaks open and out crawls Gordon Brown to give us the benefit of his wisdom.

Looking like an extra from a George Romero zombie movie, Gordon Brown became the latest member of the Living Dead to demand a second referendum.

His two immediate predecessors, Tony Blair and Johnny Major are already doing their damnest to overturn the clearly expressed will of

17.4 MILLION PEOPLE

who voted unequivocally

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION.

I think we can safely ignore Gordon's view on

DEMOCRACY.

After losing the 2010 General Election, managing to harvest 29 per cent of votes cast, he tried to hang on by what remained of his fingernails and had to be dragged out of Downing Street four days later.

HE WAS THE MAN WHO SIGNED THE LISBON TREATY IN SECRET,

sneaking in through the tradesmen's entrance to avoid photographers.

You may vaguely recall that Blair and Brown gave a solemn promise to hold a referendum on Lisbon and then cynically reneged on it. Major forced the Maastricht Treaty through the Commons, in the teeth of fierce opposition, and consigned the Conservative Party to

13 years in the wilderness.

Gordon's solution to heal the divisions which could only be exacerbated still further would be to establish a new Royal Commission to 'engage and listen' to voters views.

Brilliant.

That's exactly what millions of us had in mind when we voted in 2016.

What Do We Want?

Royal Commission!

When Do We Want It?

Now!

Anyway, what's wrong with simple accepting the outcome of the biggest single democratic exercise in

BRITISH HISTORY.

The only reason we have bitter divisions in some sections of society is that

well-funded fanatical Remainers refuse to acknowledge the result of the first

'PEOPLE'S VOTE'

and are determined

TO REVERSE IT.

Sadly this poisonous cohort contains three of our four former PM's.

To Call Me Dave's credit, he has maintained a dignified distance from the self-styled resistance to Brexit.

But what is it about certain ex-prime ministers that persuades them they immediately become sagacious statesman the moment they leave office, regardless of the mess they left behind?

Why do they think they can completely disregard the wishes of those who once voted for them and kept them in the manner to which they always  felt entitled?

Of course, all Prime Ministers eventually go mad. It just takes some a little longer than others.

IN the case of Theresa May, who is still there (for now), she has already managed to convince herself that she is the only person with the wit, imagination and ability to decide what comprises a successful

BREXIT

The sad fact is that she possesses precisely none of those qualities. As a direct result of her fatal combination of stubborness and stupidity, she has achieved the feat of joining the ranks of the

LIVING DEAD

while still in the job.

[The crisis on our streets has been brought about by Theresa May when Home Secretary when she upset the POLICE FEDERATION and she undoubtedly holds a grudge because it is lack of FINANCE that has seen the virtual disappearance of the Bobbie-on-the Beat and closure of POLICE STATIONS and the 'Wild West' anarchy on our streets.]

 

On the other hand, I suppose it takes a special kind of genius to alienate

EVERYBODY

-Leaver. Remainers, the EU Commission, the DUP-YOU NAME IT.

 

When you manage to upset both sides of the Johnson family, you're in big trouble. As I wrote back at the time of Chequers sell-out in July, she's hopelessly bungled the negotiations and is prepared to reduce Britain to

serf status

in her desperation to

SEAL A DEAL:

'Independent sovereign nations do not accept the jurisdiction of unelected foreign judges. Independent sovereign nations do not swallow wholesale rules made by unaccountable foreign bureaucrats. Independent sovereign nations are at liberty to conclude free trade deals with any country in the world.'

 

And for this she wants to bung Brussels

£39BILLION

OF OUR MONEY

Since Chequers, it's got even worse. No wonder even Remainers like Jo Johnson despair.

About the only sensible thing Gordon Brown said yesterday was that we can still go back to the EU and tell them the deal on the table won't wash - despite the fact that Brussels hasn't even agreed to that.

They think Mother Theresa is so feeble that they have been emboldened to demand continued access to Britain's fishing waters. That would be the ultimate humiliation among many. Grocer Heath gave up our traditional fishing waters to get us in to the EU. Now Mrs May could give them away again so we can 'LEAVE'.

 

YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP.

But Gordon's right. We can go back and renegotiate. Just not with the dismal, defeatist Theresa in charge

She should have the decency to resign in July, when it was clear the game was up

The only way forward is for her to fall off her kittren heels, sooner than later. After two wasted years of dissembling, betrayal, incompetance and downright surrender to Brussels, Mother Theresa deserves nothing less than an ignominious departure.

If the Conservative Party can rediscover some backbone and sense of self-preservation they can get rid of her tomorrow without having to trigger a protracted leadership contest, provided they agree on a single compromise candidate.

Who would replace her? Does it really matter? Years ago, when there was talk of a stalking horse candidate standing against Johnny Major, I reakoned a real horse could beat him.

So I invited readers to vote for either Major or Red Rum as Prime Minister. Red Rum romped home by a margin of

9-1

The talk in some quarters is that Home Secretary Sajid Javid might be the right fit. He is bright, has a compelling backstory and although he sided with Remain during the referendum, is not a committed EU federalist.

On the downside, when it comes to inspirational public speaking, he has all the charisma of Albert RN,

But beggars can't be choosers. And we can't go on as we are

Even diehard 'no deal'  Brexiteers like me have to accept, as Mick Jagger said, that you can't always get what you want.

The best we can probably hope for at this late stage is a

Norway For Now Deal;

which would get us out of the EU with no barriers to frictionless trade. It wouldn't be ideal but we could try to pick the bones out of it later.

 

Unless the Tories can pull a relatively cheap Brexit out of the fire, they will forfeit all trust and credibility and we will be staring down the barrel of a Corbyn government by default.

 

 

In a just universe, Labour shouldn't benefit from the Tory disarray. They're all over the place, too, and will vote down any deal put before Parliament because they want to force a General Election.

 

The Conservatives may be  what Terry-Thomas would have called a 'absolute shower', but do really want to live in a country with Corbyn in No 10, Mr McDonnell running the Treasury and Diane Abbott in charge of immigration and the Old Bill?

As FOR the Liberals, at least they managed to provide us with a little light relief.

Not only has 82-year old Lord Lester been suspended from the House for offering to make a women a baroness if she agreed to become his mistress - an allegation that he says is 'completely untrue'.

We also learn that 'one of their senior advisers has fallen foul of the #MeToo madness.

Apparently, he propositioned a female colleague after inviting her to dinner to discuss his party's 'Brexit position'.

Ding, dong!

I've heard of the missionary position but the Brexit position is a new one on me.

In case you're wondering exactly what her idea of the Brexit position, its like this:

Shackled together, facing both ways at once, with little prospect of an early withdrawal.

*  *  *

 

NOVEMBER 13,2018

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS-CHANGES OF FORM- ARE OURS]

 
 

STATEMENT

[Mr Richard Littlejohn has drawn an impressive  and positive picture of the present political scene which will be looked on as one of the most important epochs in the history of our island home.

 How a once FREE DEMOCRACY was SOLD out to a FOREIGN POWER and hindered in its RETRIEVAL by its ELECTED CHAMBER shows how the PEOPLE failed to heed the message of HISTORY that unless VIGILANCE is KEPT then THEIR FREEDOM is at RISK..

Over the past DECADES many PATRIOTS have WARNED of the CONSEQUENCES of the NEGLECT of our WORLD-PRIZED ANCIENT PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY an INHERITANCE in TRUST for FUTURE GENERATIONS.. THE FUTURE IS UNCERTAIN because TRAITORS within our ELECTED CHAMBER are in the ENEMIES CAMP of TWO BLOODY WORLD WARS  GERMANY because the EU was the BRAINCHILD of ADOLF HITLER.

 WHEN we are AGAIN a FREE NATION STATE our CONSTITUTION should be AMENDED to PREVENT ever AGAIN our NATION STATE of ENGLAND being a SUBJECT STATE of another POWER by the EMBEDEDMENT of OUR FREEDOM in the CONSTITUTION OF OUR COUNTRY. THe LAW of TREASON should be updated to ensure that any future individuals are punished ,who plot to undermine the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

of

ENGLISHMEN. "]

the very foundation of many constitutions the world over.

'...The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their own rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no  shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.  It may be very wrong to say that the forms of Government are of no importance and that the best system is the one best administered.  But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of FREE INSTITUTIONS is their enabling men to obtain a wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those who live under it to WATCH the CONDUCT of their RULERS, aiding them when RIGHT, checking them when they are WRONG; and above all, that no Constitution however excellent, can supersede the NECESSITY or DISPENCE with the DUTY of this CONSTANT VIGILANCE.' [Caps are Ours]

 by HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM FRS-LONDON-1844

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 13-2018

 

 

H.F.1759

*
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  - ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID

 

 *

INDEPENDENCE DAY-

MARCH 29,2019

 

The Spirit of England - Churchill in London -

St George’s Day-1953.

*

 

An excerpt from Sir Winston Churchill’s broadcast speech to the Honourable Artillery Company, given in London 40 years ago-

on St. George’s Day,

 

*

THIS ENGLAND

Publication -Spring-1993.

 

 

‘It is twenty years since I had to speak on the toast of

 

ENGLAND

 

And

on

St. George’s Day.

 

Twenty years - it’s a long time and a lot has happened, but in those bygone days I did try to see what would have happened if St. George had lived twenty years ago, and really it does apply very much to what might happen if he lived today.

 

I said St. George would arrive in Cappadocia accompanied not by a horse but by Secretary of State. He would be armed not with a lance but with several flexible formulas.

 

He would, of course, be welcomed by the local branch of the League of Nations Union - or I ought to alter that to be correct and say the United Nations Union.

 

He would propose a conference with the dragon - a Round Table Conference - no doubt it would be so much more convenient for the dragon’s tail.

 

He would make a Trade Agreement with the Dragon. He would loan the dragon a lot of money. The maiden’s release would be referred to Geneva (it would now be to New York), the dragon observing all his rights meanwhile. Finally, the dragon would be photographed with St, George.

 

Now, I do not think there’s anything very wrong with this passage although twenty years have passed, but there are a few things I would like to mention about

 

ENGLAND

 

I’m not boasting but I would like to say that here no one questions the fairness of our

 

Courts of Law and Justice.

 

We have our own way of life that is so. Here no one thinks of persecuting a man on account of his religion or his race.

 

Here everyone, except the criminals, looks on the policeman as the friend and servant of the public.

 

Here we provide for poverty and misfortune with more compassion, in spite of all our burdens, than any other country.

Here we assert the rights of the citizen against the

 

STATE

 

-       criticize the

-        

-    GOVERNMENT of the DAY

 

-without failing in our duty to the

 

Crown

 

- or our LOYALTY to the

 

QUEEN.

 

If I’m not detaining you too long there are two points I would like to make.

 

One is our weakness.

 

Our weakness is that there are always a certain number of English people who wake up every morning -very brainy they are -they wake up and they look all round the fields and they think

 

‘NOW WHAT IS THERE THAT BELONGS TO OUR COUNTRY THAT WE CAN GIVE AWAY?’

 

[Reminds us of Tony Blair and his cronies and adherents around the country in local government and the business community in 2006. and the indecent haste of Gordon Brown to ratify the Lisbon Treaty in June 2008 in order to prove to the German/Franco bloc that he is a good European.]

 or

‘WHAT IS THERE WE CAN FIND THAT HAS MADE OUR COUNTRY GREAT THAT WE CAN PULL DOWN?’

 

[Ditto -above -of course!]

 

Well, that is the question they ask themselves and THAT IS OUR WEAKNESS - they are very brainy and they have done us a great deal of harm.

 

[Ditto- as above - of course!]

 

On the other hand,

 

ENGLAND

 

-has a quality which no-one should overlook.

 

ENGLAND

 

-like Nature, never draws a line without smudging it.

 

We lack the sharp logic of some other countries whom in other ways we greatly admire - in our climate, the atmosphere is veiled, there are none of these sharp presentations, an although we have our differences they do not divide us as they do in nearly all the other countries of the WORLD.

 

There is a great underlying spirit of neighbourliness and there is without doubt a strong sense of

 

NATIONAL UNITY and LIFE

 

-       Which, though it doesn’t help us in the small matters with which we have to deal from day to day, may well be our Salvation in our troubles.

 

‘NOTHING CAN SAVE ENGLAND IF SHE WILL NOT SAVE HERSELF’

 

[That means each one of YOU in 2006 and in June 2008]

 

If we lose

FAITH in OURSELVES,

in our

 capacity to guide and govern,

if we lose

our will to live,

then indeed

our story is told.

 

If, while on all sides foreign nations are every day asserting a more aggressive and militant nationalism by arms and trade - if we remain paralysed by our own theoretical doctrines or plunged in the stupor of after-war exhaustion, all that the croakers predict will come true and

 

OUR RUIN WILL BE CERTAIN AND FINAL.

 

But why should we break up the solid structure of British power founded upon so much, kindliness, and FREEDOM?

 

Why should we break it up for dreams which may some day come true but now are only dreams, or it may be nightmares?

 

We ought as a nation and Empire -you won’t mind my mentioning that WORD? I didn’t get shouted down when I said it twenty years ago tonight -Empire, we might, we ought, to weather any storm that blows at least as well as any other existing system of human government.

 

We are at once more experienced and more truly united than any other people in the world.

 

It may well be, I say, that the most glorious chapters of our history are yet to be written. Indeed, the very problems and dangers that encompass us in our country ought to make English man and women of this generation glad to be here at such a time.

 

We ought to rejoice at the responsibilities with which destiny has honoured us and be proud that we the guardians of our country in an age when her life is a stake.

 

I have lived, since then, to see

 

OUR COUNTRY

 

-accomplish, achieve her

 

FINEST HOUR

 

-and I have no doubt that if the

 

SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

-continues, there is no reason at all why twenty years hence someone may not stand at the table of this ancient company and speak in the sense of pride and hope in which I have ventured to address you tonight.

 

* * *

 

[Sadly -the twenty years later in 1972 with the connivance of the many members of

YOUR PARLIAMENT

of ALL parties and many in the business community the 1972 Act of Accession to the EU -then falsely described as the EEC -European Economic Community came into being.

 

There are still politicians alive today in 2006 who betrayed their country and a distinguished few including Tony Benn who tried to get the people to see through the LIES and DECEIT which led eventually in 2005 to the almost absorption of ENGLAND and her sister nation-states into the

 

Despotic and Totalitarian Police State

 

calling itself

 

The United States of Europe.

 

It was the French and Dutch voters who saved ENGLAND in 2005 as our Prime Minister signed twenty fives times the Treaty in Rome which called for the Slavery of a People who had failed to remember the words of their greatest Prime Minister

Winston Churchill in 1953]

 

‘Nothing can save England if she WILL NOT save herself’.

 

* * *

 

THE TRUTH IN VERSE

 

of

 

Strasbourg and Brussels

(With apologies to Sweet Molly Malone)

by

 

John Culerwell

 

 

‘In Brussels’ fair city where the EU sits so pretty,

 

I first set my eyes on the European clone.

 

And she wielded some powers that used to be ours

 

Til we tossed them away with the Treaty of Rome.

 

She is a great sponger and sure to no wonder,

 

Her colleagues are all just the same.

 

They all wield those powers that used to be ours

 

Before we got timid and tame.

 

It’s hard to describe them without being rude,

 

Red tape is the product they freely extrude,

 

By the edicts they issue fair trade is afflicted

 

And poor nations’ prospects severely restricted.

 

On the fat of the land lives the Eurocrat Band

 

And the Gravy train runs at full steam.

 

Not for them the poor food of an African’s bread.

 

The Clones live on the honey and cream.

They can only be sacked for blowing the gaff

 

And telling the world the accounts are

naff.

 

But they regulate this then subsidise that

 

The handouts they hand out are financed by VAT.

 

Where Hitler has failed, the Clones have prevailed

 

With the help of our legislators

 

By these deeds of disgrace our MPs have lost face

 

And can only be thought of as TRAITORS

They seek to enslave us (ONLY UKIP CAN SAVE US)

 

It’s all a set part of the Eurocrats aim.

 

They are parasites ALL and they’ve got us in thrall

 

And don’t know the meaning of SHAME.

 

The Clones, we abhor them, we didn’t vote for them

 

If they think they are wanted the answer is NO!

 

But due to their muscles in Strasbourg and BRUSSELS

 

They thrive, they thrive-O.

 

*

obtained from:

 

Eurofacts

April 7-2006-04-07

Vol 11 No 13.

 

08456 120 175

info@junepress.com

 

*

 

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 

[FRIDAY, APRIL 7, 2006]

 

*

 

WHY Brussels won’t take NO for an answer

 

IN the very week that reveals more evidence of the cynicism and persistent illegality at the [ROTTEN] heart of the EU, Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson - who should concentrate on promoting FREE TRADE in a scandalously protectionist EU - pushes for a NEW CONSTITUTION that would hand BRUSSELS more power.

 

You thought Europe’s INPERIAL ambitions were DEAD?

 

THINK AGAIN.

 

Ever since French and Dutch voters threw out the CONSTITUTION, Eurocrats have been busily introducing key elements of the DOCUMENT by the BACK DOOR.

 

A European Public Prosecutor…

 

a DEFENCE AGENCY…

 

a CHARTER of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS…

 

a FOREIGN MINISTER…

 

all these and MORE ate being foisted on us anyway.

 

DEMOCRACY?

 

WHO CARES?

 

 

NOW Mr Mandelson [Meddlesome] wants to go the whole hog.

 

He says NATION STATES must SURRENDER even MORE SOVEREIGNTY for the sake of an expanding EU, and of course he speaks for BRUSSELS.

 

But examine the sorry reality behind his grandiose vision.

 

FRAUD is RAMPANT

 

THE MONSTROSITY of the COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY

CONTINUES

 

And this week

 

EUROPE’S supposedly FREE MARKET is again exposed as a

SICK JOKE

 

Twenty years ago, this country passed the SINGLE EUROPEAN ACT, as part of a European -wide initiative to TEAR DOWN barriers to TRADE.

 

A GREAT IDEA

in

THEORY

 

[which could have been achieved by all Nation States out of a DESPOTIC and TOTALITARIAN EU -with Britain giving the LEAD?]

 

BUT in practice it is a FIASCO, with most of our ‘partners’ outrageously flouting the LAW (to the disadvantage of Britain, which generally abides by the rules).

 

NOT ONLY have Member States -notably FRANCE, GERMANY, SPAIN and ITALY -rigged their ENERGY MARKETS to frustrate FOREIGN COMPETITION, but also they and others have consistently

 

BROKEN THE RULES

 

on everything from

 

State Airlines to Telecoms.

 

NOW the [EU] COMMISSION reveals the SCALE of the LAW-BREAKING with a blizzard of actions against 17 members) including Britain, for a technical infringement [they HAD TO get us in the net with the true offenders]

BUT WILL ANYTHING CHANGE?

 

[

  General de Gaulle   knew of our DIFFERENCES and vetoed our ENTRY to the then EEC and since a number of ex-COMMISSIONERS of the EU have said the same about how we would be the right example of conduct in the EU. What a waste of 34 years and the BILLIONS of POUNDS we have spent on a Fool’s errand because of the

 

Nazi TRAITORS- Edward Heath  -Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon and countless others then and since and still today now within our midst.]

 

FRANCE isn’t suddenly going to abandon the protectionism it has got away with for years.

 

NEITHER WILL THE OTHERS.

 

The habit of cheating is ingrained in an EU that is institutionally dysfunctional, corrupt and remote.

AND AS ALWAYS THE OPINIONS OF ORDINARY VOTERS MATTER NOT A JOT.

 

* * *

[We believe that the ONLY WAY to get us out of the mess of the EU would be for a CAMPAIGN for every voter to wear conspicuously a EMBLEM of their love of FREEDOM out of the EU and the others to wear chains from their mobiles or wherever so everyone will know who is for FREEDOM and who for SLAVERY.

Until there is a positive identification of the opponents within our community the GOVERNMENT can always say that it is only a FRINGE element involved. It is time to put aside OUR NATURAL RESERVE and not be afraid to wear a

 

BADGE of FREEDOM

 

We realise that in history even in our own country over 700 years ago wearing of insignia of a people led to evacuation of the Jews from ENGLAND until their return under Cromwell.

 

Under the Nazi Regime we are all aware of the millions of Jews and many others who were murdered during the 2nd World War

 

THEIR INSIGNIA BROUGHT DEATH

 

BUT

 

OUR INSIGNIA WILL BRING FREEDOM

 

Unless we put the issue above a PARTY and make it ONE of each INDIVIDUAL making a CHOICE for either

 

SLAVERY

 

or

 

FREEDOM

 

This way it will be impossible for the likes of Nice-Guy Dave and his close buddy Tony and their ilk to denigrate those who wish to be

 FREE

 Who will make a stand with others -together of what ever political persuasion or none? If we lost a relative many of us would wear a black armband or sombre clothing. Surely the possible total lose of

 

ONE’S COUNTRY and FREEDOM

 

demands some identification by each who no longer wishes to stand by and see the

 

"Rights and Liberties"

 

of

OUR INHERITENCE

lost

FOREVER.

*

[Font altered-bolding & underling used-comments in brackets]

APRIL/06

[Amended version in 2008- to take account of events in June 2008]

HOME

 

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

*

[ADDED -SEPTEMBER-2009]

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

MAGNA CARTA/ ****A Constitution millions died for/**** Bill of Rights of 1688 - OUTLAWS EUROPEAN UNION/****Almost everything which is most precious in our civilisation has come from small states/****Why We Must Remain A Christian Country/****England or European Regions/Provinces-You Cannot have BOTH!/GOVERNMENT BY CONSENT/****English Constitution-By It They Lived-For it They Died./**** A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION -CONSPIRATORS NAMED/**** Our Loyalty to our institutions and country/****Liberties of Parliament -Birthright of subjects of England/****WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT-Part 1-3/ ****The Heritage of England is a Whole made up of Many Parts/**** The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island's Defenders of Freedom now at Greater RISK./****Our basic Liberties and Freedoms - to be surrendered to a FOREIGN POWER/****TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS by NORRIS  Mc WHIRTER - Lest we Forget/****The Truth About A Federal Europe-Parts1-4/****A TIME TO MAKE A STAND/****COULD ENGLAND SURVIVE OUTSIDE THE EU?-YES!/****The Rotten Heart of Europe-by Bernard Connolly-Parts 1-4/****SAY 'NO' TO EUROPE! SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON/****So You Thought You Were FREE/****Empires have gone and most people in the world now live in Nation States said Lord Shore/****Freedom of Speech-A Freedom which cannot be abused - is NOT WORTH HAVING/****MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION/****England's place in theUNION?/****ENGLISH FREEDOM -WHY IT IS YOURS/****Our Loyalty to our Institutions and Country/

 *

[ Click HERE:There are hundreds of bulletins on ENGLISH FREEDOM listed  within and at the end of the

MAIN BULLETIN FILE]

WORK IN PROGRESS - We need to add this information to each of the bulletins above in order to assist you to scan them without leaving the site-We hope to complete it shortly.

 

SEPTEMBER-2009

*

TOP

HOME

H.F.1448

 

WORDS THAT WON THE WAR

 

 

 

 

How Churchill was acutely aware Britain’s fate lay in his ability to rouse the nation (so it's no wonder audiences are cheering his speeches in new film Darkest Hour)!

By Max Hastings for the Daily Mail

January  19, 2018

At some cinemas where the new film Darkest Hour is being shown, it is reported that audiences have been standing and applauding Churchill’s great orations, as delivered by star Gary Oldman.

This response is surely prompted by the perception of a chasm between the language of the Greatest Englishman, and the faltering, apologetic, banal and frequently craven pronouncements of the politicians of today.

Churchill mobilised our language for war in an unprecedented fashion, assisted by the fact that his finest hour took place in the age of radio broadcasting and mass-circulation newspapers alas unavailable to Henry V, Elizabeth I or prime minister William Pitt.

 

Gary Oldman plays Winston Churchill (pictured) in the film the Darkest Hour with some cinema audiences so moved by the former Prime Minister's speeches that they stand and applaud 

Churchill’s leadership and speech-making in 1940 changed the course of history.

I would take issue with the makers of Darkest Hour, who suggest — especially in an invented scene where Churchill meets ‘ordinary people’ on the London Underground — that by his defiance of Hitler, he merely gave effect to the mood of the British nation. On the contrary, until Churchill told them what to think, in the summer of 1940 his countrymen were pretty bewildered.

His understanding of the common man and woman was pretty slight, because he never conversed with them save in the guise of valets, chauffeurs and suchlike. He was oblivious to the fact that the polling organisation Mass Observation found many British people in the winter of 1939-40 could not understand why the war was being carried on.
 

Churchill was 'acutely aware' that Britain's fate in the war depended on his ability to rouse the nation

It had been started to save Poland and Poland was a goner: they hoped that some deal might be stitched up with Herr Hitler.

On May 23, 1940, a Norfolk girl named Muriel Green, who worked in her family’s garage, recorded a conversation on a tennis court with a grocer’s roundsman who said: ‘I think they’re going to beat us, don’t you?’ A schoolmaster agreed, but added that since the Nazis were very keen on sport, he expected ‘we’d still be able to play tennis if they did win’.

Muriel wrote: ‘We all agreed we shouldn’t know what to do if they invade. After that we played tennis, very hard exciting play for two hours, and forgot all about the war.’

There was plenty of defeatism higher up the scale. Captain Ralph Edwards, director of naval operations at the Admiralty, wrote in his diary on June 23: ‘Our Cabinet with that idiot Winston in charge changes its mind every 24 hours. I’m rapidly coming to the conclusion we’re so inept we don’t deserve to win, and indeed are almost certain to be defeated.’

 

With audiences cheering his speeches, Churchill has been widely credited for his oratory skills which convinced people that Nazism could be defeated

It is essential to grasp all this; to understand that foreign secretary Lord Halifax — the ‘Holy Fox’ as Churchill derided him — was far from the only person who, after Dunkirk, saw no hope of successfully defying Hitler.

Churchill, in 1940, had to climb a mountain to convince not only the Americans and the world, but also his own people, that they must resist Nazism to the end, in defiance of every rational calculation of the odds.

With the British Army disarmed — many of its formations would not become fully equipped even until 1944 — his words became the foremost weapons of the British Empire. And what words they were!

We should be captivated not merely by the set-piece speeches, but also by spontaneous utterances to his intimate circle.

Most great men are cold fish. Churchill was almost unique in his warmth, displayed to his young private secretary John Martin, to whom he apologised for sometimes speaking roughly, laying a hand on his shoulder and saying: ‘I may seem very fierce, but I am fierce only with one man: Hitler.’

Another secretary, Jock Colville, described how at Chequers on the warm summer night of June 15, 1940, even as fresh tidings of disaster came, Churchill displayed the highest spirits, ‘repeating poetry, dilating on the drama of the present situation . . . offering everybody cigars, and spasmodically murmuring “Bang, bang, bang, bang goes the farmer’s gun, run rabbit, run rabbit, run, run, run”.’

In the early hours of the morning, when U.S. ambassador Joseph Kennedy telephoned, the prime minister unleashed a torrent of rhetoric about America’s opportunity to save civilisation. He held forth about Britain’s growing fighter strength, ‘told one or two dirty stories’ and departed for bed at 1.30am, saying ‘goodnight, my children’.

At least some of this must have been masquerade, but it was a masquerade of awesome nobility.

Consider the tones he sometimes adopted to the Commons, where, in 1940, he commanded more confidence on the Labour benches than the Conservative ones.

After telling MPs that, for security reasons, the House’s sittings would no longer be advertised, he added wryly: ‘We ought not to flatter ourselves by imagining that we are irreplaceable, but it cannot be denied that two or three hundred by-elections would be a quite needless complication of our affairs at this juncture.’

After visiting Fighter Command’s 11 Group Operations Room on August 16, at the height of the Battle of Britain, his chief of staff ‘Pug’ Ismay made a remark as they drove back to Chequers. Churchill said: ‘Don’t speak to me. I have never been so moved.’

Silence followed for a few minutes, then he proclaimed that famous phrase: that never had

 ‘so much been owed by so many to so few’.

 

 Ismay wrote later: ‘The words burned into my brain,’ and of course Britain’s prime minister thereafter shared them with the world, and with history.

 

Churchill's war speeches have been brought back to the public consciousness by the film the Darkest Hour which sees the British leader played by Gary Oldman (pictured) 

His humanity was wondrous, even with Britain at its last gasp. Even when discussing his vision of a post-war world, after hearing others demand a terrible vengeance upon Hitler’s nation, he dissented, saying: ‘We [have] got to admit that Germany should remain in the European family. Germany existed before the Gestapo.’

Some of his most marvellous rhetoric was deployed towards the Americans, whose belligerence was indispensable to any hope of victory.

During the anguished, protracted period of U.S. neutrality, he said in a transatlantic radio broadcast: ‘A wonderful story is unfolding before our eyes. How it will end, we are not allowed to know. But on both sides of the Atlantic we all feel — I repeat, all — that we are a part of it; that our future and that of many generations is at stake.

‘We are sure that the character of human society will be shaped by the resolves we take and the deeds we do.’
 

Gary Oldman has been widely praised for his portrayal of Winston Churchill, with the actor winning a number of awards (pictured)

The philosopher Isaiah Berlin wrote: ‘Like a great actor upon the stage of history, he speaks his lines with a large, unhurried and stately utterance in a blaze of light, as is appropriate to a man who knows that his work and his person will remain the objects of scrutiny to many generations.’

Indeed, Churchill’s words and deeds were so marvellous that I can never understand why screenwriters feel a need to invent spurious ones. I’m uncomfortable with Gary Oldman’s portrayal, partly because his Churchill sometimes displays the bumblings of senility, which the prime minister certainly did in 1944-45, but never in 1940.

Our wartime leader seemed incapable of opening his mouth without delivering a jewel of language. When a woman presented herself at the door of No 10 Downing Street to offer a £60,000 necklace to the Exchequer, Churchill quoted Macaulay: ‘Romans in Rome’s quarrel / Spared neither land nor gold.’

He repeatedly murmured the lines of Lovelace on the execution of Charles I: ‘He nothing common did nor mean / Upon that memorable scene.’

Seldom has a great actor on the stage of human affairs been so mindful of how his words and actions would be viewed by posterity. But without those words we would have been lost. A different British prime minister — Halifax, Chamberlain, even Eden — could easily in the summer of 1940 have persuaded the British people that logic and the preservation of some portion of the Empire made necessary a parley with Hitler; effectively, a surrender.

Churchill alone convinced the nation that Nazism represented an evil so absolute that it must be resisted to the very end, no matter the cost.

 

Almost 80 years after he first gave the speeches, Churchill has prompted cinema audiences to rise and applaud his words

A few years ago, when I was writing my book about Churchill at war, I encountered a letter from a woman named Eleanor Spilsby, an elderly psychology lecturer living in South London.

She wrote to a friend in America on July 23, 1940: ‘We are proud to have the honour of fighting alone for things that matter more than life and death.

‘It makes me hold my chin high to think, not just of being English, but of having been chosen to come at this hour for this express purpose of saving the world . . . There is surprisingly little anger or hate in this business — It is just a job that has to be done . . . This is Armageddon.’

Here was the peerless spirit of Britain at that time, magicked into being by the words and leadership of Winston Churchill, which almost eight decades later prompt some cinema audiences to rise and applaud them.

Highlights from some of Churchill's most powerful wartime speeches

Extract from Churchill’s first speech as Prime Minister to the Commons on May 13, 1940. Four days earlier, the ‘phoney war’, the period of relative calm following the declaration of war on September 3, 1939, had ended with the German invasion of France, Belgium and Holland. Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain resigned and was replaced by Churchill.

‘I would say to the House, as I said to those who have joined this government: “I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat.”

‘We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many long months of struggle and of suffering.

‘You ask, what is our policy? I can say: It is to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy.

‘You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: It is victory, victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival.

‘Let that be realised; no survival for the British Empire, no survival for all that the British Empire has stood for, no survival for the urge and impulse of the ages, that mankind will move forward towards its goal.

‘But I take up my task with buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men. At this time, I feel entitled to claim the aid of all, and I say, “Come then, let us go forward together with our united strength.” ’

 
 

 Extract from his first broadcast as PM to the country on May 19, 1940.

‘I speak to you for the first time as Prime Minister in a solemn hour for the life of our country, of our Empire, of our allies, and, above all, of the cause of freedom . . .

‘It would be foolish . . . to disguise the gravity of the hour. It would be still more foolish to lose heart and courage or to suppose that well-trained, well-equipped armies numbering three or four millions of men can be overcome in the space of a few weeks, or even months . . .

‘Side by side, unaided except by their kith and kin in the great Dominions and by the wide empires which rest beneath their shield — side by side, the British and French peoples have advanced to rescue not only Europe but mankind from the foulest and most soul-destroying tyranny which has ever darkened and stained the pages of history.

‘Behind them — behind us, behind the armies and fleets of Britain and France — gather a group of shattered states and bludgeoned races: the Czechs, the Poles, the Norwegians, the Danes, the Dutch, the Belgians — upon all of whom the long night of barbarism will descend, unbroken even by a star of hope, unless we conquer, as conquer we must; as conquer we shall.

‘Today is Trinity Sunday. Centuries ago, words were written to be a call and a spur to the faithful servants of truth and justice, “Arm yourselves, and be ye men of valour, and be in readiness for the conflict; for it is better for us to perish in battle than to look upon the outrage of our nation and our altar. As the Will of God is in Heaven, even so let it be.” ’

 
 

Extract from his Commons speech on June 4, 1940, after the evacuation of 338,000 Allied troops from Dunkirk.

‘I have, myself, full confidence that if all do their duty, if nothing is neglected, and if the best arrangements are made, as they are being made, we shall prove ourselves once again able to defend our island home, to ride out the storm of war, and to outlive the menace of tyranny, if necessary for years, if necessary alone.

‘At any rate, that is what we are going to try to do. That is the resolve of His Majesty’s Government — every man of them. That is the will of Parliament and the nation. The British Empire and the French Republic, linked together in their cause and in their need, will defend to the death their native soil, aiding each other like good comrades to the utmost of their strength.

‘Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous states have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail.

‘We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God’s good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old.’

Extract from his Commons speech on June 18, 1940.

‘What General Weygand [the French Allied commander] called the Battle of France is over. I expect that the Battle of Britain is about to begin.

‘Upon this battle depends the survival of Christian civilisation. Upon it depends our own British life, and the long continuity of our institutions and our Empire. The whole fury and might of the enemy must very soon be turned on us.

‘Hitler knows that he will have to break us in this island or lose the war. If we can stand up to him, all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands.

‘But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.

‘Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, “This was their finest hour.” ’

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5290257/Churchill-war-speeches-cheered-Darkest-Hour-audiences.html#ixzz54jZLWM3R
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

[A LESSON OF HISTORY]]

 

     

    Throughout its benighted history,

     

    megalomaniacs have tried and failed

     

    to

     

    subjugate Europe's sovereign nations.

     

     

    Here, with Brussels making the same

     

    mistake,

     

    says SIMON JENKINS asks will they ever learn

     

     

    from...

     

     

    2,000 YEARS OF HUBRIS AND FOLLY

SATURDAY

ESSAY

BY

SIMON JENKINS: Dictators failed to unite Europe's ... - Daily Mail

OCTOBER 20, 2018

 

ON AUGUST 6, 1806, a herald in full regalia rode across Vienna to the city's Jesuit church. He climbed the tower blew his silver trumpet and summoned the crowd to silence. he then announced that the Holy Roman Empire was dead.

After a thousand years of existence, Europe's oldest union was being wound up-courtesy of Napoleon. The crowd wept.

Might it happen again? History tells us that whenever Europe tries to act in unison, it screws up. The Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne left an empire that collapsed in ruins. Ferdinand of Bohemia tried to create a single Roman Catholic empire, and unleashed the Thirty Years War in the 17th century. Napoleon brought most of Europe under his rod, an millions died until Wellington did for him at Waterloo.

 The Allies punished Germany after the First World War, and so brought Hitler to power. Today's European Union mishandled Russia after 1989 and paved  the way for the reign of Vladimir Putin.

Anyone who believes the EU is so modern, united and peace-loving that it will deftly handle Britain's departure should read history and shudder.

 Ever since somewhere called Europe came into being under the Ancient Greeks, two forces have driven this continent forward.

One is the  inability of the descendents of its original migrant tribes to live in peace with their neighbours. The other is the attempt of one power

 [GERMANY TODAY]

after another to seek to dominate and unite those disparate tribes.

 

Rome  tried. So did successive popes, Holy Roman emperors, Louis XIV, Napoleon, Hitler and now, dare I add, the leaders of the European Union. Some of these attempts were well-intentioned; most were not so'

There is no question they together forged a continent that is globally outstanding.

Today, Europe is wealthy, stable, mostly liberal and a magnet to the world's migrants, rich and poor alike. Whether this was  because of or in spite of a history of ceaseless conflict is an open question, But so, too, is whether half a century of stability can survive any new breakdown in unity.

WHEN I first studied Europe's history, I searched for themes that have glued together its various forces. First was the potency of ancient Mediterranean culture. Greece under Pericles was a kingdom of reason, fascinated by the human condition as expressed in art, literature and civic politics.

Rome was a sort of opposite, a realm of law and order, the wielding of power over the entire Mediterranean basin. 'These be your arts, O Rome, 'said Virgil, to impose the ways of peace,' The operative word was impose.

As Roman rule disintegrated, it mutated into that of the Christian Church.

Christianity was ostensibly a doctrine of universal love and peace, but it soon became a cauldron of rivalry and disunity. It split Rome from Constantinople, and proved so quarrelsome that a third of Christendom-in the Levant and Africa-became Muslim and has remained so ever since.

 In 1216, the bid of Pope Innocent III to declare himself sovereign lord of Europe bred endless conflict with the Holy Roman Empire, based in Germany. So we can conclude that as a glue of union, religion was a failure. By the 16th century the Reformation had split Innocent's Roman church in two, between Protestant north and Catholic south.

This in turn led to the Thirty Years War-the cruellest devastation of Europe before the 20th century. From the wreckage of that first great European War ever more potent nation states -notably France, Spain and Austria.

The new cause of disruption was not religion but dynasty. Louis XIV sought perpetual war with his neighbours. Russia flexed its territorial muscles. Frederick the Great of Prussia declared that 'national enlargement is a fundamental law of life'. To him, Europe was synonymous with struggle.

Nothing seemed able to bring peace to the continent: not the vitality of the Renaissance or wisdom of the Enlightenment, not great thinkers and writers like Petrarch, Shakespeare. Locke, Voltaire or Goethe.

Napoleon's attempt to unite Europe under French rule led to

5,000,000 DEATHS

The victorious nations at the Congress of Vienna in 1815, a few months after Waterloo valiantly attempted a

'Concert of Europe'.

In future, they ordained, difference would be settled around a conference table not the battlefield.

Peace lasted for a century, while Europe plunged into a different form of aggrandisement-that of overseas imperialism

 

 

 

By the end of the 19th century, the British, French, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish and Germans ruled an astonishing half the world's population and 85 per cent of its trade

Some might have hoped that such expansion might leave Europe itself in peace. Yet no sooner had it strutted the globe as a champion of progress then it fell victim to two of the world's most horrendous conflagrations.

The idea that the 'Kaiser's war' and then 'Hitler's war were random Prussian monstrosities was absurd. They resulted from a failure of political imagination and leadership across all of Europe, whose turbulent nations seemed incurably belligerent.

 By 1945, Europe was in self-inflicted ruins. Its peoples were starving, its cities destroyed and a centuries-old edifice of cultural achievement was crippled. Though Fascism had been defeated, the price was half a continent enslaved to Communism, and the other half dependent on American protection.

There is no doubt that the subsequent half-century saw  Europe at its best. It rebuilt itself, displaying a sincere desire for there never to be a war ever again

 A Common Market was formed in 1956 under the Treaty of Rome. This treaty grew and flourished, until a free trade area covered virtually all non-communist Europe. The continent seemed genuinely at peace, under the embrace of 'ever closer union'.

 But as this half of Europe prospered and cohered, it also slid into the morass of bureaucratic centralism. And here is where the lassons of history were ignored

 

The ambition of the Brussels  elite was curiously reminiscent of the medieval church. It became a quest for ever-tighter control of its adherents, and a disregard for the political mood of member states

The first moment of truth came with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. This ended the wartime division of Europe, to which the EU reacted like a conquering power. It enticed Russia's old Warsaw Pact allies into the EU and NATO, and left Moscow dangerously isolated.

When Boris Yeltsin warned that advancing NATO deep into Eastern  Europe meant 'the flames of war could break out again across Europe, the EU laughed.

The result was Vladimir Putin, vowing to 'make Russia great again' under  his kleptomaniac rule.  In the U.S., the balance of power between a central superstate and its various subordinate states was embedded in a constitution, written in blood. I Europe, that balance was left to evolve.

The EU ignored the risks it was running, not just in mishandling Russia, but in readily opening its borders to the immature democracies of Eastern Europe.

[And not forgetting the arrival in Germany of the once East German official Frau Merkel.]

After Maastricht in 1992, which effectively pledged the continent to become one giant federal entity, majority voting in the EU council eroded the authority of NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS.

Europe seemed the plaything of French bureaucrats and German bankers.

[HITLER WOULD BE PROUD]

 

 

Once more, the hard-learned lessons of the past were disregarded in the zealous pursuit of a new Nirvana. For example, the continent's longest confederation was the Holy Roman Empire. Voltaire may have called it not holy, nor Roman nor an empire-but its respect for the treasured autonomy of dozens of German princelings contrived to keep the German people's at peace with their neighbours for a millennium. Europe gained in the process, the wealth of the Rhine and the Baltic, the radicalism of Luther and the genius of Bach and Beethoven. That union collapsed only when Napoleon in France and then Bismarck in Germany could not tolerate what they saw as affront to their imperial ambitions.

The collapse of a united Europe did neither tyrant any good, but it did turn Germany from a peaceful confederacy - a kind of giant Switzerland - into a belligerent power under the supremacy of warlike Prussia.

The lessons must be obvious. Attempts at European union fail when they lose respect for the

IDENTITY

AND

AUTONOMY

of the continent's ancestral communities

You cannot ram union, let alone

GLOBALISATION

down people's throats. Diversity lies at the core of Europe's collective experience, but it is jealously guarded diversity.

Europe can never be subsumed under a single power structure. Union can only be a light-touch and consensual.

The EU's greatest mistake was to move beyond ever-closer trade to an ill-defined' ever closer union'. Above all, it lay in demanding that member states accept open borders.

That may have seemed a small matter to the globe-trotting cosmopolites of Brussels. But control over immigration meant control over the

CHARACTER and RATE of CHANGE of LOCAL COMMUNITIES.

To the member states of Europe this was a critical area-of sovereignty

[sacrosanct]

The character of one's society is not to be bartered merely for tariff-free trade.

Unlike previous unions in Europe, the EU is a collection of self -determining democracies.

Already by 2010, anti-European sentiment was growing and consent crumbling. Turnouts in EU elections plummeted from

60 % to 40 per cent.

Populist politicians-anti immigration and often anti EU-emerged in the UK. France, Italy, Germany and former communist states. The 2008 financial crisis saw the Eurozone's GERMAN MASTERS  inflict terrible damage on GREECE and SPAIN.

Then in 2016, the UK shattered the equilibrium. Its people voted -narrowly- to withdraw. Europe's union face d a fissure, and a deep one.

There was nothing new in Britain detaching itself from the rest of Europe. It had 'left' after the Hundred Years War that finally ended in the mid-15th century and after Henry V111's defection from Rome nearly a century later. It refused to join the Common Market in 1957, and only combined under NATO to benefit from America's nuclear shield.

Now, once again, Britain has said

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

We should have no doubt of the reason. Political Europe has not found an answer to the question that defied all earlier attempts at union. How can this fragmentary continent be united without lurching either towards debilitating central authority or towards disintegration

Since the Lisbon Treaty of 2009, the EU has lurched towards the former. Now, with the rise of a reactionary populism, it is lurching towards the latter

There is hardly a member state that would dare imitate Britain and hold a Referendum on EU membership. But that is insufficient consent for union.

With or without Britain the EU must find a way of returning substantive sovereignty to its 

MEMBER STATES

not least over their borders. If it does that, who knows, Britain might rejoin.

If it fails, Britain will not be the only defector. The EU will go the way of its many forerunners - to

DISINTEGRATION and DANGER.

*  *  *

 

SIMON JENKINS: Dictators failed to unite Europe's ... - Daily Mail

OCTOBER 20,2018

 

A SHORT History of Europe:

From Pericles to Putin by Simon Jenkins. Viking, £25 (20pc discount), visit www.mailshop.co.uk/books or call 0844 571 0640, p&p is free on orders over £15. Spend £30 on books and get FREE premium delivery. Offer valid to 27/11/2018

shop

H.F.1678

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE        IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS
AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE TRAITOROUS EDWARD HEATH WILL BE RETURNED IN MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017--       - (1994 -Official Website-MARCH-2019 ) -   JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017-PT1 -

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019

MONTH OF DELIVERANCE?

FROM HITLER'S -CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -GODLESS-SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

*
 

 

 

Image result for Winston Churchill-'We are a part of Europe but not of it...

 

 
 

WHY HE IS SO SORELY MISSED IN ENGLAND AND IN DEMOCRACIES WORLD WIDE

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

by

WINSTON CHURCHILL

DEATH OF THE LAST GIANT - A DAY TO REMEMBER!

Winston+Churchill-

'We are a part of Europe

but not of it'...-

*

ALSO WISE WORDS

FROM

A Prime Minister in 1848

Over a Hundred and Sixty Four years ago a great patriotic Prime Minister - Foreign Secretary - Lord Palmerstone (Henry John Temple) - beloved by his People defined the principle of nationality as follows:

“ Providence meant mankind to be divided into separate nations, and for this purpose countries have been bounded by natural barriers, and races of men have been distinguished by separate languages, habits, manners, dispositions, and characters…” (1848)

 “…We have in the first place to say that the Business of an English Government, is to pursue that course of Foreign Policy which on the whole they may think right; and not to attempt the impossible task of at all times and upon all subjects doing that which is agreeable to all Foreign Governments. A man who in private life attempts to please everyone, invariably fails; and the Government of a great country would not be more successful in such an endeavour…

 . It must at times be an advantage to a foreign Prince…in the present state of the continent to visit England and to see with his own eyes, how Liberty may be combined with Loyalty, Freedom with public order, and how the Respect which is shown by the Crown for the Rights of the Subject and for the enactment of the Law produces corresponding Feelings on the Part of the People and inspires them with similar Respect for the Rights of the Crown and for the Laws which secure the Liberties and the Property of all , from the highest to the lowest in the Land. ”

[Of course the  MONARCHS  of ENGLAND since the 19th Century have been under the INFLUENCE of the ILLUMINATI.]

 

Winston Churchill warned the populace in the

1920's

 of the true facts of the ILLUMINATI who  have virtually ruled the world  since

 

WATERLOO

*

In the 1920's Winston Churchill mentioned the Jewish Bolsheviks the details a

 JEW WATCH

[As we have explained the social circles which Winston Churchill  was connected  with during his long life such as the Rothchilds and like-others were the Establishment existing at the time from the Disraeli era. It was an impossibility to ignore particularly as he wished to further his career.  Of course he was a strong and enthusiastic supporter of the BRITISH EMPIRE in its outer image and must have been aware of the true nature within.   Those that might criticize him should consider the circumstances of the time which have ameliorated somewhat over the past decades until the present day when there are at last changes afoot.]

 
 

A WARNING!

 FROM A PATRIOTIC PRIME MINISTER

BENJAMIN DISRAELI

IN

 1852

In the 19th Century, Benjamin Disraeli, [Beaconsfield] a baptised Jew,[Prime Minister of England-1868 ] proclaimed:

 

...the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes...The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property...The natural equality of men and the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the secret societies who form provisional governments and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them.'
 

WE MUST NOT FORGET!

William Ewart Gladstone

 a great prime minister

 symbolised by his rolled  up sleeves-

 a man with the common touch.

Words of a great Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, are much to the point:

 

‘’The finance of any country is ultimately associated with the liberties of the country. It is a powerful leverage by which English liberty has been gradually acquired. If the House of Commons by any possibility loses the control of the grants of public money, depend upon it, your very liberty will be worth very little in comparison. That powerful leverage has been what is commonly known as the power of the purse – the control of the House of Commons over public expenditure’’ (1891)

*

BENJAMIN FREEDMAN -

 A JEW

UNCOVERED TO THE WORLD IN 1961 IN WASHINGTON D.C. THE

 ZIONIST CONSPIRACY.

-HE SPENT HIS LIFE WARNING THE PEOPLE OF THE GREAT DANGER TO THEIR LIVES AND LIBERTY

JEW WATCH

[As we have stated elsewhere many JEWS world-wide do NOT! agree with the  NEW WORLD ORDER - ZIONIST MESSAGE.]

 JewsnotZionists

[THE FLAG ABOVE OF THE ANGLO-SAXONS THE TRUE FLAG OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE.

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

 HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

 WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

*

[THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID NOTHING!]

 

 

ENGLAND

OUR

ENGLAND 

ALL ABOUT

FREEEDOM

AND INDIVIDUALITY

 

 

 

WHERE IS OUR REFERENDUM DAVID CAMERON ON THE UNDEMOCRATIC SOVIETISED SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION?

 

NOVEMBER-2012

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM 2012

 

H.F.1330/1

 

 

Magna Carta

As a copy of the historic charter of rights goes on sale, PETER OBORNE says we need an updated version to protect us from an overweening State.

 ONE OF the very few surviving copies of the

MAGNA CARTA

the  famous document that is the foundation of ENGLISH and later British liberty  - has come up for sale in New York.

Experts say this copy of the charter will sell for as much as £6 million. BUT the protection written out in the

Magna Carta

back in 1215 are priceless and never in our  history have they come under such sustained and ruthless attack as during the ten years of this Labour Government.

In the 13th century , it was the

MONARCHY

, and in particular feared tyrant

King John,

that was the enemy of

FREEDOM and LIBERTY

 

In the 21st century, the power of the STATE

is the menace.

It poses an ever-growing threat to the

LIBERTY of THE BRITISH PEOPLE.

IN MANY CASES SEIZING ON NEW TECHNOLOGY TO

MENACE OUR FREEDOM.

 TODAY ,in SEPTEMBER ,2007, THE SITUATION IS SO BAD THAT WE ARE IN URGENT NEED OF A

NEW

MAGNA CARTA

-ONE THAT ENSHRINES THE

FREEDOM

of the

BRITISH CITIZEN

FROM

STATE OPPRESSION

*

Here the Mail's political columnist outlines the ten basic freedoms this new document should contain...

 

1.   FREEDOM OF SPEECH

 

2.   RIGHT TO PROPERTY

 

        3.   RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE

 

4.   MAKE THE HOME OF A BRITISH CITIZEN SACROSANCT

 

5.   PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

6.  RIGHT TO PRIVACY

 

7.   THE RIGHT TO PROTEST

 

8.  HABEAS CORPUS OR FREEDOM FROM UNLAWFUL DETENTION

 

9.   TRIAL BY JURY.

 

10.  FREEDOM FROM SUMMARY JUSTICE.

*          *          *

 

THESE ARE ALSO THE AIMS OF THE

friends of england

 

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY

 

 

1. FREEDOM OF SPEECH

THE ability to speak our mind is a key freedom that distinguishes British citizens from those in countries which are tyrannies. In modern Britain, this freedom is slowly being eaten away. Often the motive is virtuous -for example part of the anti-terror legislation or to prevent racism. nevertheless, free speech is under threat as it has not been for hundreds of years.

The reality is that political correctness, though well-intentioned, is turning into a totalitarian monster that can censor any debate and distort argument about burning issues such as mass immigration and multiculturalism.

*

OUR COMMENT

[We believe that the FREEDOM of SPEECH  should NOT have been tampered with under any circumstances.

It is as we have said so often one can always find a reason to curb free speech. It was the government which made illegal war on Iraq and interfered in Afghanistan. TO VOICE ONE'S ANGER AT GOVERNMENT MISDOINGS IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. IT IS ONLY WHEN THAT FREE SPEECH ACTUALLY CALLS FOR VIOLENT ACTION AND NOT PASSIVE ACTION THAT THE LINE SHOULD BE DRAWN. THOUGH EVEN HERE IF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY BETRAYED THE PEOPLE THEN AS HAPPENED IN OUR SEVENTEENTH CENTURY CIVIL WAR BETWEEN PARLIAMENT AND THE KING VIOLENCE WAS THE ONLY SOLUTION IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE ANCIENT RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF THE PEOPLE. ]

The poet John Milton who was secretary to Oliver Cromwell during the seventeenth century civil war between Parliament and the King uttered the following words in his famous call for freedom of printing and speech in "Areopagagita"

'Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties'

 

*

2. RIGHT TO PROPERTY

AS ALMOST all political philosophers have recognised, the right to private property is a key protection against tyranny. One of the reasons why King John was hated in the 13th century England was the high taxation he levied on his subjects. THIS BURDEN on the ordinary citizen has risen to previously unheard of levels in the past 100 years.

While everyone accepts taxation is necessary to pay for

DEFENCE

[NOT ILLEGAL WARS]

PUBLIC SERVICES

[NOT WASTE OF RESOURCES]

and other amenities of the STATE, today it is close to punitive.

TO GIVE ONE EXAMPLE: People living in quite modest dwellings are caught with massive inheritance tax bills, which force them to sell their family homes.

*

OUR COMMENT

 

We have ALWAYS maintained that Governments should have a fixed budget at the commencement of their term of office which would make them hesitant to spend on projects which were unreliable or too costly as we have with VARIOUS databases and CCTV cameras and other surveillance activities. Major projects should be matters for an independent panel in the HOUSE.

A FAMILY HAVE TO BUDGET SO SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT.

 

*

 

 

3.  RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE

THIS basic principle of human freedom was not enshrined in

MAGNA  CARTA

Instead , it was fought for over centuries by minority religious groups.

TODAY, however, all religions are under threat from militant secularism.

FOR EXAMPLE: Charities for the Christian, Muslim and other FAITHS face discrimination and withdrawal of

STATE FUNDING

which is made lavishly available to secular organisations,

In another encroachment on RELIGIOUS BELIEF, CATHOLIC adoption agencies are forced to act against their consciences by placing children with HOMOSEXUALS.

*

OUR COMMENT

ONLY when religious groups are a danger and threat to the community and country should the government interfere. When our nation was the custodian of an EMPIRE we made illegal a number of practices which entailed loss of life and in other areas where it was prudent to do so. Because of our NON-INTERFERENCE in other matters the question of the CASTE SYSTEM in INDIA of which has been hidden from view by those from the Sub-continent who have tarred our nation as a racist nation and who's representatives no doubt led the Commission for Racial Equality but should have stayed behind to RIGHT THE WRONG in THEIR OWN BACK YARD .We mentioned this matter a number of years ago but was ignored by THE PRESS.

 

4.  MAKE THE HOME OF A BRITISH CITIZEN SACROSANCT.

UNTIL recent times, the POWER of the STATE to enter a subjects home has been very

LIMITED. But new legislation has awarded public bodies numerous powers to enter private homes WITHOUT CONSENT.

TODAY, there are no fewer than

266

Statutory provisions and ministerial orders that allow entry to private dwellings, often

WITH THE OPTION TO USE FORCE.

*

OUR COMMENT

It is our political system which needs change because to all intents and purposes we have in

OUR HOUSE OF COMMONS

ONE

 

POLITICAL PARTY

 

We have said for some time that TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM

[Each word underlined has a separate bulletin]

should have some

COMPETITION and ONLY

 PR-Proportional Representation

WILL REDRESS THE BALANCE.

[We looked with our Search facility to find out how many times we have mentioned PR-Proportional Representation over the past five years possibly longer - it runs into 100's.

BUT AT NO TIME HAVE OUR FREE PRESS PICKED IT UP TO HAVE A GO!

 

A further change should be that NO MP should serve more than ONE TERM of each PARLIAMENT to enable many subjects from across our society to SERVE THEIR COUNTRY. It is because many MPs have found it a cosy number and not intent on rocking the boat when misplaced legislation is raised in the HOUSE that has led to OUR TROUBLES. They would rather toe the line rather than risk their comfortable jobs, perks and gold-plated pensions at the next GENERAL ELECTION.

Those members of Parliament that show distinction and courage at the present time under difficult circumstances because of the anger of their colleagues should be offered the position of belonging to

AN INDEPENDENT COMMITTEE of PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY

 which will in future protect the future direction of

PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE.]

*

 5.  PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

ALL British citizens are presumed

INNOCENT until proven GUILTY

But this Ancient Right is under

THREAT

from a

GOVERNMENT

promise to introduce

IDENTITY CARDS

forcing us to carry a document we can present to the authorities

ON DEMAND.

The ID card threatens to become a massive weapon in the hands of

AN INTRUSIVE STATE

Another flagrant attack on the

 

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

concerns

DNA

samples taken from suspects.

It used to be the case that the police would destroy the fingerprints of those who were either acquitted or never charged.

Under new proposals, they will be able to retain DNA profiles in all circumstances.

*

OUR COMMENT

How have we got into this mess?

EASY

The Government of the Day takes away the first protection of the householder

'THE BOBBIE ON THE BEAT'

So that all local intelligence over years in each neighbourhood by the local Bobbie is lost and the subject to subject relationship of cooperation and confidence is destroyed.

WHAT DOES THIS DO?

CRIME ESCALATES OUT OF CONTROL

Which gives the very reason for the Government's reaction of more control from the CENTRE.

 

HOW DO YOU MAKE IT WORSE?

You refuse to build more PRISONS and you go soft on the PUNISHMENT OF CRIME and make it very difficult for the

VICTIMS OF CRIME

by instead of arresting the criminals but arrest

THE VICTIMS

to discourage others from reporting

CRIME.

EASY DON'T YOU THINK?]

*

 

6. RIGHT TO PRIVACY

The British STATE, and also large corporations, are constantly seeking to discover more information about our private lives and to monitor our actions.

For example, Britain has now become the

CCTV CAPITAL

OF THE WORLD

with approximately 20 per cent of all closed -circuit television cameras based

IN THIS COUNTRY

*

 

OUR COMMENT

 

As explained above the loss of the full-time 'Bobbie on the Beat' has meant that criminals now have the streets to themselves and therefore the Government has by its own negligence turned to CCTV to fight crime because police officers are now occupied for much of their time filling in forms. Added to this we have a cheaper version of our intrepid police force who are mindful of

WHAT THEY CANNOT DO

to make their inferior services not even worth the money they are paid.]

 

*

 

7. THE RIGHT TO PROTEST

The traditional British citizen has enjoyed the ability to

PROTEST AGAINST GOVERNMENT

ACTION

One effect of the recent anti-terror legislation has been to curtail this

RIGHT

MASSIVELY.

Though nobody doubts that it is necessary to give government powers to combat terrorists often these powers have been used in  very heavy-handed ways.

One famous example came in 2005, when the anti-war protester Walter Wolfgang was held under anti-terror laws for heckling Jack Straw at the Labour Party conference.

Another case concerned Maya Evans, victim of a ban on unauthorised protests in

WESTMINSTER

when she was arrested for reading out the names of soldiers killed in Iraq, near the Cenotaph.]

 

*

8.  HABEAS CORPUS, OR FREEDOM FROM UNLAWFUL DETENTION.

 

THIS was set out in the original Magna Carta, and survived intact for eight centuries, but is now under ferocious attack

Habeas Corpus is the single most fundamental freedom of the

BRITISH SUBJECT

one which distinguishes us from tyrannical countries such as

BURMA

 CHINA

NAZI GERMANY

or the former

SOVIET UNION

where citizens can be seized

at whim by the police and held without trial.

In rare times of national emergency, such as World War II and the most violent phase of Northern Ireland troubles, British governments have temporarily suspended

THIS VITAL PROTECTION.

Habeas Corpus translates literally as

 

'thou shalt have the body [in court]'

and enshrines the  right

TO A FAIR TRIAL.

 

However, Tony Blair tried to get rid of it altogether by introducing legislation which would enable the

STATE

to hold suspected terrorists for

90 days

without being required to give reasons.

This was fought off in the COMMONS, but Gordon Brown appears to be intent on mounting a fresh assault.

*

 

OUR COMMENT

This Ancient right of the English people does not fit in with the European Union's system as is the case for Trial by Jury and this is WHY pro-EU politicians here wish to do away with it as they have with many of our historic County regiments and others distinguished in battles of the

BRITISH EMPIRE.

As the aristocrat Francis Fulford has said:

England is f****d]

*

9.  TRIAL BY JURY

THIS principle , like 

HABEAS CORPUS was, was enshrined in [English Law by Magna Carta and later its principles into British law]

                                It survived for eight centuries before coming under venomous attack by modern governments which dislike its inefficiency and expense.

 The right to jury trial means that British citizens, unlike those of foreign dictatorships, are entitled to demand to be tried by

'12 good men and true'

rather than convicted by an arbitrary tribunal.                         

 

A GOVERNMENT BILL in 2006 tried to take away this right for complex cases, but the proposal was blocked in the

HOUSE OF LORDS.

*

OUR COMMENT

 

As with Habeas Corpus, Trial by Jury, the pro EU BRITISH GOVERNMENTS  which have been all governments since the passing of the 1972 Accession Act to the then supposed EEC need to destroy these FREEDOMS in order that we fit the pattern in the European Union.

IT IS THAT SIMPLE

And this attitude applies to anything which reminds the EU of Britain's past whether it is our historic regiments or what ever.

If it had not been for our long troublesome

HOUSE OF LORDS

our freedoms would have been spirited away by NOW!

*

10. FREEDOM FROM SUMMARY JUSTICE

ALONGSIDE

 the attack on

JURY TRIAL

modern British government has sought to move away from formal justice to an improvised system of

EXECUTIVE JUSTICE

thus sidestepping the

DUE PROCESS OF LAW

which has been the defining feature of the

BRITISH SYSTEM.

This kind of casual justice has been introduced for a variety of offences, for example hooliganism and shoplifting. The resultant move to fixed penalty notices means the suspects can buy their way out of the formal process of

PUNISHMENT

by paying a FINE.

As a result, shoplifting and some other offences are subject to

TAXATION

rather than

 CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT.

 

*

 

IN a famous passage, the great 20th century historian AJP Taylor wrote that

'in August 1914, a sensible, law-abiding Englishman could pass through life and hardly notice the existence of the

STATE

beyond the post office and the policeman. He could live were he liked and as he liked. He could travel abroad or leave his country for ever without a passport or any sort of official permission.'

ONLY 90 years have passed since he uttered those words and today the

OPPOSITE IS TRUE.

The growth of the

STATE

intrudes everywhere upon our lives and our

LIBERTIES

We must set boundaries

NOW!

or our

ANCIENT FREEDOMS

-the very things which define us as

 British

[ENGLISH]

-will be lost for ever.

 

*

 

OUR COMMENT

 

We need to take measures to dismantle the excessive interference of the

STATE

In other words reduce the numbers and the excuses for those millions to interfere in our lives.

Our HOUSE OF COMMONS should NOT BE FOR THE FEW it should be for the MANY. We advocate that MPs serve ONE TERM in PARLIAMENT thereby enabling thousands of people from ALL WALKS OF LIFE to SERVE THEIR COUNTRY.

 

The achievement of success should be judged on

LESS LAW

and

MORE COMMON SENSE.

Our parliamentary system  consists of  many members of parliament who look on the HOUSE as their bread basket and will do whatever they can to increase their share of the wealth and privileges of membership.

Of course there are a select few who are a credit to the hallowed chamber and they must NEVER be forgotten. But in the main our self-servers need to see some competition and many put out to grass.

ONLY

 

A change to a ONE TERM period of OFFICE will defuse the power grabbers and enable many to

SERVE THEIR COUNTRY

AND

 

PR PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

Will enable more subjects to serve their country not in their own interests but for their fellow subjects and

QUEEN and COUNTRY.

 

We in ENGLAND are at the crossroads of history in our nation's future as an INDEPENDENT NATION STATE we can either take account of our long illustrious history and remain FREE and have the ability to serve not only our own country but EUROPE and the WORLD.

or become just a PROVINCE of a supposed EUROPEAN UNION which is already showing signs of collapse after over 50 years.

For us and millions of subjects in our country the last option can NEVER be accepted. And if we must fight to protect that which is dear to us then

SO BE IT!

 

Our challenge will be the ancient call from

our northern neighbours who have their own historic moment in history when in

 1320

in their

Arbroath Manifesto

Sent by the nobles and Commons of Scotland

to the

Pope

stated:

 

'We fight not for glory, nor for wealth, nor for honour but for that freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.'

 

*

And over centuries and particularly over the past 100 years millions of our fellow subjects have laid down their lives rather than submit to

TYRANNY.

 

WE MUST NOT BRING SHAME ON THE SACRIFICES OF THE PAST.

 

*          *          *

 

A NEW REFORMATION

IN

EUROPE

 

Milton's Faith in England

 

No English writer in any age has ever expressed his faith in England with more impassioned ardour and greater eloquence than Milton...

Inspiring almost all that he wrote was his passionate concern for

LIBERTY

and second only to that love was his faith in the English people as having for many generations striven more valiantly to win

FREEDOM

and  valued it more highly than any other modern people. When a young man in Italy his Italian hosts professed to envy the

ENGLISHMEN'S FREEDOM

he "took it as a pledge of future happiness, that other nations were so persuaded of

ENGLAND'S LIBERTY" (B., II,82)

On his return to England in the summer of 1639 the great struggle for

CIVIL and RELIGIOUS FREEDOM

was already imminent, and he was soon engaged on controversial writings. His prose treatises have long lost much of their topical interest.

 [until the advent of Tony Blair and his cohorts of destroyers of everything English and his successor's refusal to keep a promise

TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE.]

... he bids the two nations English and Scots,

"never to be disunited" but to make common cause "settle the pure worship of God in his church, and justice in the state" (407)

..he asked his readers not to forget "what numbers of faithful and freeborn Englishmen" had gone overseas to find religious freedom which was denied them at home.

[In 2007 we can look back over ten years and see the flood of the English leaving their once free homeland for the freedom elsewhere in the world which the English and later the British had laid the foundations of liberty by their sacrifices in two World Wars in the 20th century and by their ancestors example in the years of the preceding centuries.]

The treatise ends with an eloquent prayer that God who did

"build up this Britannic empire to a glorious and enviable height, with all her daughter - islands about her," and had scattered the Spanish armada, may now, "stay us in this felicity" and

DELIVER ENGLAND FROM TYRANNY AT HOME.

[And that is our wish in October , 2007]

 

As a nation we have always turned our attention to tyranny abroad and have on many occasions in our long history either militarily or on many occasions used our respected diplomacy to achieve the good end and help those in need wherever they may be.

However , over the past decade the foreign policy of England has been poisoned by a man who few now wish to remember with his five wars and his illegal and disastrous invasion of Iraq.

Which returning to the work of Milton in his Epic

"PARADISE REGAINED"

'..what do these Worthies

But rob and spoil, burn and slaughter, and enslave

Peaceful nations, neighbouring, or remote,

Made Captive, yet deserving freedom more

Than those their Conquerors, who leave behind

Nothing but ruin wheresoe're they rove

And all the flourishing works of peace destroy?'

(III,74.)

 

Today many of us have on our minds the tragedy of the Burmese people who have suffered the tyranny of Military Dictatorship for over four decades. Here again we call on John Milton to express in his own words on the barbaric happening to the protestant subjects of the Duke of Savoy in 1655.

 

'When they refused to quit their homes, the troops were sent to expel them, and the villages were laid waste and many of the inhabitants brutally murdered, while the survivors took to the snow-covered mountains.  The news of this cruelty stirred England profoundly.

The Protector [Oliver Cromwell], forgetful of the savageries practiced by his soldiers, five years before at Drogheda and Wexford, came forward as the champion of the Pietmontese.

...Partly as a result of Cromwell's representation and threats and partly French interposition the Duke restored the ancient rights by a treaty signed on 18th August, 1655.

Milton as poet [even though secretary to Cromwell] could vent his strong feelings in the most passionate of all his sonnets.

'Avenge, O Lord, thy Slaughtered Saints"

[We in England in October,2007 would not disagree with this statement. How much more we can do if we remain a FREE and INDEPENDENT NATION STATE than as a PROVINCE of EUROPE with our voice drowned by the multitude in BRUSSELS and BERLIN.]

 

Here, more than in the Latin letters Milton expressed the English mind, of his day and of posterity.

*

 

[Milton and the English Mind

by

F.E.Hutchinson

D.Litt., F.B.A.

HODDER  & STOUGHTON LTD

1946]

 

[The works of one of our greatest poets and prose writers John Milton are shown in countless places amongst our 1600 bulletins. We have many additions from Shakespeare; Wordsworth, and writers such as Samuel Johnson, John Wilks and many others who have played a great part in a

DEFENCE of ENGLAND.

*

Our last words are from John Milton and are prescient at this hour in a nation's story.

'Methinks I see in my mind a noble and puissant Nation rousing herself like a strong man after sleep, and shaking her , invincible locks: methinks I see her as an Eagle mewing her mighty youth, and kindling her undazzled eyes at the full midday beam; purging and unscaling her long-abused sight at the fountain itself of heavenly radiance; while the noise of timorous and flocking birds, with those that love the twilight, flutter about, amazed at what she [England] means, and in their envious gabble would prognosticate a year of sects and schisms. (94.)

 

In his treatise Of Reformation (1641) he had written:

 

'The best-founded commonwealths and least barbarous have aimed at a certain mixture and temperament, partaking the several virtues of each other state...There is no civil government that have been known, no not even the Spartan, nor the Roman...more divinely and harmoniously tuned, more equally balanced as it were by the hand and scale of justice than is the commonwealth of England; where under a free and untutored monarch

, the noblest, worthiest, and most prudent men, with full approbation and suffrage, have in their power the supreme and final determination of highest affairs. (B.,II,408).

 

*

In his day John Milton commented:

Liberty had been put " like a bridle into the hands of the Parliament and Assembly.

also

Faction and favour carried the day, justice was delayed and then denied, and though there were some "men of wisdom and integrity" in Parliament, "the greatest part" proved unworthy of the confidence placed in them.

[sounds familiar to us in 2007-don't you think?]

Milton held that there was "in number little virtue, but the weight and measure wisdom working all things"

 

FREEDOM is,

 as always Milton's unremitting concern, but his experiences , both personal and political, have taught him that the only

FREEDOM WORTH HAVING is in obedience to the VOICE of REASON

 

'yet know withall,

Since thy original lapse, true Libertie

Is lost, which always with right Reason dwells

Twinn'd and from her hath no individual being:

Reason in man obscure'd, or not obeyed,

Immediately, inordinate desires

And upstart Passions catch the Government

From Reason, and to servitude reduce

Man till then free

(XII,82.)

And as it is with individuals, so it is with nations.

Yet sometimes nations will decline so low

From vertue, which is reason, that no wrong,

But Justice, and some fatal curse annext

Deprives them of thir libertie

Thir inward lost.'

(XII,97.)

As we are aware the past decade has seen a continuing slide into the abyss of the general moral degeneracy of our people from Politicians to the Public broadcasting to Business and the People at large and to top it all outside observers have concluded we are the unhappiness peoples in Europe and possibly in much of the World. The recent Daily Mail  COMMENT on the matter was an apt reminder and a warning. Milton was against censorship but he did believe that GOOD should be given a fair hearing as his works particularly his Epic work testifies. Some might say it is no longer fun to SIN because everyone is doing it . History has on record the decline of many nations who ignored -the writing on the walls -or something of that nature.

 

He further stated:

It was more just "that a less number compel a greater to retain their liberty, than that a greater number, for the pleasure of their baseness, compel the less, most injuriously to be their fellow slaves "

TIME WILL TELL IF WE WERE

as a people to ignore the warnings from our greatest war leader

 Winston Churchill

 

TOO LATE!

 

And in John Milton's words who like Samson in his "Samson Agonistes" , he had taken  impulsively a wife from the Philistines, he was afflicted with blindness, he had championed the deliverance of his people who in the end would rather have

"bondage with ease than strenuous liberty"

WE HOPE THIS IS NOT TRUE OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE IN OUR DAY

 

*          *          *

WE ARE BACK TO THE BEGINNING-USA-1787-2009-ENGLAND

 

 

EU- A FUTURE SUPERstate

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

*

[ADDED -SEPTEMBER-2009]

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

MAGNA CARTA/ ****A Constitution millions died for/**** Bill of Rights of 1688 - OUTLAWS EUROPEAN UNION/****Almost everything which is most precious in our civilisation has come from small states/****Why We Must Remain A Christian Country/****England or European Regions/Provinces-You Cannot have BOTH!/GOVERNMENT BY CONSENT/****English Constitution-By It They Lived-For it They Died./**** A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION -CONSPIRATORS NAMED/**** Our Loyalty to our institutions and country/****Liberties of Parliament -Birthright of subjects of England/****WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT-Part 1-3/ ****The Heritage of England is a Whole made up of Many Parts/**** The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island's Defenders of Freedom now at Greater RISK./****Our basic Liberties and Freedoms - to be surrendered to a FOREIGN POWER/****TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS by NORRIS  Mc WHIRTER - Lest we Forget/****The Truth About A Federal Europe-Parts1-4/****A TIME TO MAKE A STAND/****COULD ENGLAND SURVIVE OUTSIDE THE EU?-YES!/****The Rotten Heart of Europe-by Bernard Connolly-Parts 1-4/****SAY 'NO' TO EUROPE! SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON/****So You Thought You Were FREE/****Empires have gone and most people in the world now live in Nation States said Lord Shore/****Freedom of Speech-A Freedom which cannot be abused - is NOT WORTH HAVING/****MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION/****England's place in theUNION?/****ENGLISH FREEDOM -WHY IT IS YOURS/****Our Loyalty to our Institutions and Country/

 *

[ Click HERE:There are hundreds of bulletins on ENGLISH FREEDOM listed  within and at the end of the

MAIN BULLETIN FILE]

 

 

WORK IN PROGRESS - We need to add this information to each of the bulletins above in order to assist you to scan them without leaving the site-We hope to complete it shortly.

 

SEPTEMBER-2009

*

TOP

HOME

H.F.1446

 

WHY I WANT

OUT OF THE EU

 

I want out because I fear that our

NATIONAL IDENTITY

OUR WAY OF LIFE

and tradition of liberal democracy are under

THREAT

from the EU's rules on the

FREE MOVEMENT of PEOPLE

and its

INSANE

HUMAN RIGHTS REGIME

I WANT OUT

because I believe that

BRUSSEL'S

attempts to impose

UNIFORMITY

on hugely diverse peoples are holding economies back, destroying livelihoods and breeding dangerous ill-feelings between

NATIONS.

I WANT OUT

so that we can regain the right to elect those who make our laws-and to

DISMISS THEM IF THEY FAIL US

I'm sick of seeing my country infantilised by an

UNSACKABLE NANNY STATE.

IN A WORD

I WANT OUT BECAUSE I WANT

BRITAIN

[ENGLAND]

TO BE FREE

*

Tom Utley for the Daily Mail

[We couldn't have put it better-Thank you!- Tom Utley.

TOM UTLEY: Oh dear. Is the fact my wife was a bus ... - Daily Mail-Friday, June 3,2016l

 

H.F.805
WHY I LOATHE  BRUSSELLS
 

 

They steal our fish, squander our cash and treat our views with contempt. For decades Labour's Grimsby

 MP Austin Mitchell passionately campaigned against the

E U.

On the second anniversary of the referendum, his cri de coeur will cheer the

HEART OF EVERY BREXITEER.

 

 

Why I loathe Brussels: They steal our fish, squander our cash and treat our views with contempt, writes AUSTIN MITCHELL

By Austin Mitchell For The Daily Mail

 June 23, 2018

 

513

View
comments

 

Austin Mitchell was a backbench Labour MP for 40 years before stepping down in 2015. 

A self-confessed maverick who refused to toe the party line, he has always been fiercely opposed to Britain remaining in the EU. 

Here, on the second anniversary of the EU referendum, he delivers a powerful and timely reminder of why Brexit must be seen through.

 
 

My long-held and passionate attitude to the European Union is summed up in four words — three of which are ‘the European Union’, preceded by a commonly used four- letter verb of exhortation that the Oxford English Dictionary describes as ‘vulgar’.

I’ve always been a Eurosceptic, ever since I first stumbled across the Common Market, as the EU then called itself, in 1962. I was 28, Yorkshire born and bred, and, with my doctorate from Oxford, was teaching history at a university in New Zealand. A colleague gave a lecture on the Common Market — and, to my horror, he endorsed it as ‘a good thing’.

Incredible. Almost blasphemy. Britain led the Commonwealth. New Zealand, rich in dairy products, was its antipodean farm. Europe was there for us to defeat in war. How could an Englishman be so daft?

 

Austin Mitchell campaigning for fishermen in 1978. He was a backbench Labour MP for 40 years before stepping down in 2015

Fortunately General De Gaulle, the French president, agreed with me and dismissed British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan’s efforts to join a club he should never have applied for in the first place.

I was further comforted when a succession of British politicians came out to New Zealand to assure us that if Britain did join this alien institution then, scout’s honour, New Zealand’s access to the British market would be protected. The old relationship would carry on.

They lied. Albion can be perfidious and was particularly so when it betrayed New Zealand by joining in 1973 — egged on by Tory prime minister Ted Heath, who was so eager to get us into Europe that he did so on less than favourable terms. We were asking to be clobbered and duly were.

I was back in Britain and had switched jobs to become a journalist and a presenter on regional television when two years later Harold Wilson, the new Labour PM, called for a referendum to endorse or reject that decision. 

I voted ‘No’. But two-thirds of the country said ‘Yes’. We were staying in.

I was far from convinced this was the right decision, and my hostility increased when in 1977 I was elected Labour MP for Grimsby.

The town’s fishing industry had been ruined when the Europeans cunningly declared the seas around Britain common waters and gave other members, even landlocked Luxembourg, equal access. 

As a result, we got only a small proportion of our own fish.

I formed a Save Britain’s Fish campaign, which attracted support from all over the country.

Tory MP Edwina Currie pointed out that: ‘You don’t want to save Britain’s fish. You just want to eat them.’ Which was true, but far better for us to eat them than have them gobbled by undeserving Europeans who took our jobs and the processing industry with them.

 

Tory MP Edwina Currie pointed out that: ‘You don’t want to save Britain’s fish. You just want to eat them’

There was more to my scepticism about Europe than a lingering desire to catch our own fish, however. 

I believed then, and still do now, that the nation state is not only the best but the only way of advancing the cause of the people while maintaining their democratic control of the process.

There is nothing the EU can do for us that we can’t do better for ourselves. Europe is too big, amorphous, divided and powerless. 

It’s not a democracy but a plutocracy with a rootless bureaucracy, always pursuing an ever-closer union the people don’t want, yet never able to reach it.

As a concept it is a piece of sublime mysticism and nonsense, a mirage.

The trouble was that the EU couldn’t break away from its original purpose of protecting French agriculture and boosting German industry. 

With these two states dominating, Europe embarked on a journey where few wanted to go, to an ever-closer union only the Brussels bureaucrats sought, imposing policies without democratic consent and ever prepared to overrule the people for their own good.

My basic reason for opposing membership was economic. The European Union drained Britain of jobs, money, demand and growth. 

It became a brake on our economy, not an accelerator. 

Being a deal between the interests of Germany, which needed a bigger market for its manufacturing, and France, which wanted agricultural protection for its food, the EU didn’t suit Britain, a net agricultural importer with a less modern and less well-invested industry.

The basis of British trade had been buying cheap food, particularly from Commonwealth countries, and sending them our manufactured goods in return.

That stopped after we joined. The Common Agricultural Policy required us to buy France’s more expensive food. Costs went up and every family of four lost £20 a week.

Meanwhile, Labour’s policy to boost jobs in the regions had to be scrapped because it was against the rules. What had been a surplus in our trade with Europe before we went in became a steadily growing deficit.

Our membership contributions — in effect, our payments for being damaged — went up year by year, siphoning off money to Europe, particularly to the powerful German economy, which generated ever-bigger surpluses at the expense of everyone else and particularly us.

To cap all this, Europe’s fast growth, which enthusiasts had claimed Britain would hitch up to, slowed substantially.

That’s why in my successful campaign in the 1979 General Election, I stood on a soapbox outside the Bird’s Eye frozen fish factory in Grimsby to denounce Brussels. And I’ve been doing so as vigorously as I can ever since.

But I’ve increasingly found myself out on a limb in a political class inexorably drawn to Brussels.

Europe is very attractive for those who don’t like Britain. 

For the liberal intellectuals and many of our elite, who saw themselves as cosmopolitan rather than nationalist, Europe was nicer than their brutal, xenophobic compatriots. 

Those suffering in Britain — the unions, local government and the Labour Party — came to love the beguiling hopes Europe held out for them.

They didn’t see that it had no ability to help lame dogs over stiles and that its handouts were really the nation’s own money coming back, but with the EU’s heavy costs deducted.

My views remained unchanged as the Common Market marched on, grandiosing into the European Community, then the European Union.

Major Labour figures from Roy Jenkins to Peter Mandelson went off to Brussels and found a bigger and better stage to strut on.

 

Brussels came up with the Exchange Rate Mechanism, to set in stone rates of exchange between the various European currencies. Tory Prime Minister John Major took us in briefly. It was a disaster

There, people actually listened to them rather than dismissing them out of hand. They came back to proclaim Europe’s benefits. 

Then Brussels came up with the Exchange Rate Mechanism, to set in stone rates of exchange between the various European currencies.

Tory Prime Minister John Major took us in briefly. It was a disaster. The whole system collapsed and Britain was humiliatingly forced out.

We sceptics heaved a sigh of relief, forgetting the propensity of dogs to return to their own vomit.

Instead of backing off, the EU went for an even stronger monetary union by creating the common currency, the euro.

Unable to get electoral support for ever-closer union, the EU bureaucracy tried to smuggle it in through the back door. 

A common currency, they hoped, would lead to convergence and develop the central institutions necessary to manage it.

By now Tony Blair was in Downing Street with his New Labour re-make. It wasn’t a respray job on the old jalopy but a total re-engineering.

Daft as a Liberal when it came to anything that would demonstrate his Euro-enthusiasm, he was passionately in favour of a single European currency.

Not understanding economics, he didn’t realise that Britain would be shackled by a fixed, and inevitably overvalued, exchange rate, with consequences ruinous for our weaker economy.

Fortunately, Gordon Brown, his Chancellor, saw the dangers and managed to think up five tests, failure in any of which would deny entry until the time was ripe. Which in my view it never would be.

Britain stayed out of the euro, thank heaven, leaving us peripheral to the Eurozone, the EU’s great adventure into the clouds. 

The Eurocrats persisted with monetary union, even though it forces deflation on weaker and less competitive partners. 

Britain would have been one of these if we had been foolish enough to join in.

Brussels showered money on the weaker European economies, then crippled them with unsustainable and unrepayable debt, as the Germans refused to underwrite it. Any grudging help went to save the banks, not the individual nation.

Increasingly the EU was losing its shine. Unemployment was high, with a quarter of its young people out of work.

Germany built up huge economic surpluses, which it didn’t spend or recycle to the less successful economies. 

To manage the euro, the EU needed the economic institutions of the nation state, but the Germans couldn’t accept that.

The EU could only move forward by greater federalism to create ‘ever-closer union’ but the members didn’t want this straitjacket. It was hit by the refugee crisis and couldn’t agree on what to do about it.

 

By now Tony Blair was in Downing Street with his New Labour re-make. It wasn’t a respray job on the old jalopy but a total re-engineering

It could possibly have conciliated British public opinion by delivering benefits to Britain, whose EU membership costs were spiralling all the time. 

But it wouldn’t and didn’t. It was deadlocked: rudderless and dominated by Mrs Merkel, the most cautious politician in Europe.

Yet still Britain clung to the edge of this rickety raft.

The public were told to be happy with this developing disaster, and a Euro-enthusiastic Tory-led coalition government did nothing about it.

That is, until an overconfident David Cameron buckled to pressure in his own party and announced that he would solve his party problems by renegotiating improved terms for our membership, to be endorsed by a referendum.

 

He asked Brussels for changes to make the EU more acceptable in Britain. He got nothing worth having but still embarked on what he confidently assumed would be an easy victory.

The battle of Brexit was a thrill for me. I had stood down from Parliament by the time of the referendum. I was into my 70s and had been an MP for nigh on 40 years.

Suddenly I was in demand again. 

As one of the few survivors of that rare breed, the Labour Eurosceptic, I was hauled into debates to provide a balance to overconfident Euro-enthusiasts who couldn’t believe anyone would be insane enough to want to leave the Franco-German condominium.

It was the best fun I’d had for years. It was marvellous to harangue large audiences who were with me, for a change, rather than sitting there in stony-faced silence as Labour audiences had.

Even more wonderfully, the campaign ended in triumph. To the amazement of Cameron and the rest of Britain’s elite, he lost. The British electorate, two-thirds of whom had voted to stay in 1975, had changed its mind.

Victory was a strange new phenomenon. It had never happened to me before. I was as euphoric as any politician is ever allowed to be.

What happened, though, was in fact a peasants’ revolt rather than a triumph for my arguments.

 

The people, angered by cuts, stagnant living standards, de-industrialisation and austerity, used this unaccustomed power to express their unhappiness not just at Europe but at three decades of neo-liberal politics and globalisation which had done little or nothing for them.

The educated and the liberal middle classes had come to identify with Europe as part of their privileged way of life, and supported a union that they saw as the symbol of enlightened internationalism and civilised (ie their own) values. 

The less well-off, the less educated and the people who’d been left behind felt differently.

Britain’s elite were shocked by the nation’s rejection of their wisdom and advice. George Orwell once remarked that ‘England is perhaps the only great country whose intellectuals are ashamed of their own nationality’. 

That remained true of the liberal intellectuals, who’d given up on Britain and saw Europe as the future.

For the people to reject the EU just showed how irredeemable the British were.

It was, as they saw it, a surrender to racism, xenophobia, insularity and everything liberal intellectuals dislike in their own people.

On the other hand, Eurosceptics like me saw the vote as the result of a 40-year learning experience.

For me, the referendum result was the turning point I’d hoped for since 1979. The people had achieved what the politicians had failed to do. 

It’s a shame it took so long and that so much damage was done before it came. Winning is rare in the political game. But it’s nice.

It has not, though, led to any belated acclaim coming my way. After the referendum, invitations to speak dried up as if I’d been a personal friend of Jimmy Savile. 

The Guardian lost every article I sent them (as it had before, but now without explanation or reply).

The BBC, which had used me as a tame Brexiteer throughout the campaign, once it was over immediately replaced me with a Muslim to keep up their other diversity targets.

As for what lies ahead of us, the EU’s intransigence and the weakness of an insecure Government in negotiating are making withdrawal messy and difficult. 

The Remainers don’t help. 

They denounce the vote as the result of fear, ignorance, even Russian deceit, and have unleashed another, even bigger tide of fear about the consequences.

They do everything they can to discredit the British case for withdrawal, to shackle, soften and weaken the Government’s negotiating position and to collude with the EU to resist it, in the hope that eventually the people will give up their foolishness and stay, unhappily or not, in the promised land.

The Brexiteers, in contrast, can only wait and see, hoping for a good outcome which can’t emerge until negotiations end.

The British Government has been weakened by its second election and Remain’s long rearguard action.

The EU Commission, struggling to keep its rickety show on the road and facing unmanageable difficulties in Eastern Europe and Italy, wants to punish Britain pour décourager les autres.

These are the symptoms of an impossible negotiation. I fear that the account by the former Greek minister of finance, Yanis Varoufakis, of the way the EU crushed his country’s aspirations may well be an omen of what’s to come.

Intransigence, delay and simple bloody-mindedness were their weapons — and clearly still are.

Those who believe they have a divine right to rule don’t give up easily. Nor must we.

  • Extracted from Confessions Of A Political Maverick by Austin Mitchell, to be published by Biteback on July 3 at £20. © Austin Mitchell 2018. To order a copy for £15 (25% discount), call 0844 571 0640 or go tomailshop.co.uk/books. P&P is free on orders over £15. Offer available until July 9, 2018.

 

*  *  *

 June 23, 2018

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM DECEMBER 2004

 

A Message to Members of ALL Eurosceptic Parties- WE NEED YOU NOW!

 

The People of our nation are now in a final battle to save their Ancient Constitution which can only be successful if all members of all other euro-sceptic parties of what ever its position whether to the Right or Left of the political scene to put their own full weight behind the UKIP at the General Election in May 2005.

 

Only those who are interested in ‘empire building’ will seek to contest the forthcoming General Election in 2005.  All we are asking is that on this critical time in the life of our nation we need all hands to the wheel to show all politicians that their cosy game of power politics will take second place to the People’s right to claim back their inheritance before the so-called Democratic parties have the opportunity to finally sell us –and our Country.  

 

Those eurosceptic parties who put their own ambitions first before the safety of the Constitution which has enabled them to participate in the political arena will have themselves to blame if because of their obstinacy that all is undone and their ability to contest further elections will be placed in jeopardy by Brussels.

 

We hope that there will be a spontaneous resolve by all members of other eurosceptic parties to work together to achieve what we all want-an Independent Nation-State with control of our Borders and our Defence and the return of our Fishing Fields and so much more which will be within our grasp if we for this crucial time in our long history we think of ourselves as Britons and Unite Together for the Country we all Love.

 

Let us all show the politicians who over 33 years have drip–fed our ‘Rights and Liberties’ to Brussels that we now say ‘Enough is Enough’ and we now demand back that which has been taken from us by Deceit and Lies.

We are aware also of our DUTY to our Ancient Constitution and Country    

                         12/04

 

Don’t let your children and their children down –but protect their Inheritance- in trust from the past.

 

*

 

‘We fight not for glory nor for wealth nor for honour but for that freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.’

 

(From the Arbroath Manifesto sent by the Nobles and Commons of Scotland to the Pope in 1320)

*

TO PROTECT YOUR COUNTRY AND YOUR CONSTITUTION

 

VOTE

UKIP

 

THE PARTY WITH A MANDATE TO LEAVE THE EU

 

 

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM DECEMBER 2004

[ADDITIONS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1583
 

 

 

Revealed:

The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich ...in the EU

*

 

By Adam Lebor
Last updated at 10:30 PM on 09th May 2009

 

 

The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for 's post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis' return to power and work for a 'strong German empire'. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

 

Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with I. G. Farben

Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben

The three-page, closely typed report, marked 'Secret', copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany's economy by sending money through Switzerland.

They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire - but not just German.

The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.

The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of . The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War.

But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact.

Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.

Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?

The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 - and it paints an extraordinary picture.

The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.

 

Auschwitz

Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a factory run by German firm I. G. Farben

There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. 'It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.' Such defeatist talk was treasonous - enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo's cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.

But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to 'make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion'.

The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.

They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company.

But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.

Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich.

In stage one, the industrialists were to 'prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis', using the term for the French resistance.

Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a 'secure post-war foundation in foreign countries', while 'existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat'.

In stage three, German businesses would set up a 'sleeper' network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power.

'The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,' Bosse announced.

'Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.'

 

Enlarge   The 1944 Red House Report

Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing 'plans of German industrialists to engage in underground activity'

The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission.

The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.

Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.

Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence.

The Red House Report's author notes: 'Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence.

'Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party's plans for its post-war operations.'

The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter.

More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.

During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it.

A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.

He says: 'By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.'

Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.

As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.

A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad's gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility.

By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf's ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS's massive pan-European economic empire after Germany's defeat.

Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the transition to a post-war economy after Germany's defeat. This was dangerous, especially as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups.

But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service, protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS.

Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS's economic empire almost worthless.

The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to introduce a currency that would have any value.

That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency, Germany was once again an attractive trading partner.

The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires across Europe.

War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 - despite six years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments - the capital stock of assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the armaments boom.

Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered European continent. The answer was through supranationalism - the voluntary surrender of national sovereignty to an international body.

Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today.

But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists convicted of war crimes.

The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years.

Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death.

The Krupp company soon became one of Europe's leading industrial combines.

The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a fortune of more than $1billion, the equivalent of £400million at the time.

'For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,' says historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers.

'The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.'

Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the V1 rocket.

Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with the SS officers overseeing the camps.

Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany's most powerful banker, had prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of Deutsche Bank, Germany's biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded, Deutsche Bank enthusiastically 'Aryanised' Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were owned by Jews.

By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche Bank's wealth had quadrupled.

Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, as Deutsche Bank's representative. I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany's most powerful companies, formed out of a union of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties.

It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other prisoners died producing artificial rubber.

When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis' chilling term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent for which was owned by I.G. Farben.

But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben's bosses hedged their bets.

During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard's research. After the war, 24 I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III - but only twelve of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder.

Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany's post-war reconstruction. It was largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a 'strong German empire' was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today's European Union.

Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid - reconstruction funds - to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany's economic recovery.

Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.

Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are strikingly familiar today - on monetary integration and common transport, energy and welfare systems.

When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs was his most important financial adviser.

Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer.

That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and European Commission.

Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard Germany's first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as Chancellor for three years.

But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe - was built on mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by German companies in the Nazi era was

 2,700,000.

Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry.

A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer 5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any further legal action.

To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of £1.8billion.

Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory.

But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief, once said: 'In 50 years' time nobody will think of nation states.'

For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today's drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich - an economic rather than military imperium.

• The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor's thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is published by Reportage Press.

 

Places:

,

Print this article Print this article

Read later Read later

Email to a friend Email to a friend

 

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

 

*

[ Prime Minister Edward Heath was a NAZI SPY for over 60 years to his death in 2005 before which he publicly admitted that he had lied to the people when he said there would be no loss of sovereignty. His fellow traitors were Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon who were reported to MI5 in 1938 by the Master Lindsay of Balliol College Oxford . Harold MacMillian before him was exposed by intelligence sources 13 years earlier in 1957 as an agent of the German Abwehr.     

This country has been served by many traitors since that day as a look at the list of members of the

and that is not a complete list because of the great difficulty of obtaining the names of those who belong to such a secretive body.  But we know that Gordon Brown- Ed Balls on the Labour side and Kenneth Clarke and George Osborne the Shadow Chancellor on the Tory side. The Liberal Democrats have their David Steel and no doubt many others. The Governor of the Bank of England Mervyn King is also on the list and this man has charge of our of the future financial  health of our nation. And we must not forget our greatest despot Tony Blair.

www.worldreports.org.uk

[We have hundreds of Bulletins on the European Union listed below

*

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

 

H.F.1290
 
A CONSERVATIVE PARTY

PROMISES TO GET TOUGH ON LAW AND ORDER

IN

OCTOBER 2019

WHAT ARE ITS CHANCES

NILL

The DECADES LONG AWAITED CONSERVATIVE HARD-LINE POLICY

ON

LAW & ORDER

DEPENDS ON MORE PRISON SPACE

IN SIMPLE WORDS

MORE PRISONS

Because all the promises will avail

NOTHING

if there is no more prison space to hold the expected much increased number of

OFFENDERS

expected with the much increased number of offenders with their long belated no nonsense plan to increase the

Bobbies -on-the- Beat

and

the tougher sentencing for criminals who have played the system for too long to a stage that so called secure prisons are now in competition with Hilton and other majors hostellers with their good fare and comfort. The criminals have played the system for too long. Open Prisons should be secure prisons, and life in prison should not resemble a holiday camp, but time put to good affect to change the attitude of offenders for their good - but more importantly for the good of the law-abiding citizen in the community.

[See  the following article by Philip Davies MP.]

OCTOBER 6,2019

 

*

 

 

MAY-2015

  1. Beat Bobbies are dying out,

     

    warn police:

     

     

    Leaders say ...

     

    - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Police-leaders-say-officers-endangered-budget-cuts- hit.html

    By James Slack and Arthur Martin for the Daily Mail. Published: 18:03 EST, 19
    May 2015 | Updated: 18:04 EST, 19 May 2015. View comments. Bobbies on the ...
      

     

    [OVER THE PAST DECADE AND LONGER WE HAVE SHOWN MANY ARTICLES FROM THE DAILY MAIL ON THIS IMPORTANT AND VITAL SUBJECT OF THE LOSS OF THE BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT. AND ITS AFFECT ON THE GENERAL POPULATION BUT PARTICULARLY  ON THE GROWING OLDER POPULATION.  BUT WE HAVE ALSO STATED THE IMPORTANCE OF THE BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT IN A NATIONAL EMERGENCY BEING FELLOW CITIZENS AND PART OF THE COMMUNITY WHICH SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE COMPLETELY  IGNORED.-MAY 2015 ]

H.F.1896

 
 

SUNDAY EXPRESS

 

 

Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies MP
 

ISN'T the House of Commons there to represent the people of the United Kingdom? It might seem a strange question but are MPs actually representing people on key issues?

Many MPs now seem to advocate representing the public on a politically correct tick box. Not a day goes by without someone mentioning the need to

 "represent/reflect the communities we serve"

Back in the real world, in terms of truly representing the people (rather than obsessing about someone's gender or skin colour) how are you feeling?

 Absolutely abysmally I'd say.

The most head-grabbing current example is Parliament's continuing mission to try to

frustate

BREXIT

We know the House of Commons is out of touch on

[HITLER'S]

EU.

Around 75 per cent of MPs voted for or campaigned for

REMAINING IN THE EU.

[A REMAINER PARLIAMENT]

However the [June 23-2016] result was that people voted to

LEAVE

and yet still many MPs seem to think they can cast aside public opinion like an old sweet rapping and carry on as they were before the public [their masters] came up with an answer

THEY DID NOT LIKE.

['THE BASTARDS'

AS  DAILY MAIL'S QUENTIN LETTS HAS RIGHTLY CALLED THEM. ]

We knew the EU would try to do that but shouldn't we expect better from our own MPS?

After all, they were telling voters this was a once in a lifetime chance to record

THEIR OPINION .

This does not sit comfortably with many MPs spending every waking hour

since

TRYING TO DISHONOUR THE RESULT

especially when most MPs elected since the referendum stood on a manifesto

 with a clear commitment to implement

BREXIT

YOU do not have to look far for another example of the chasm between

PARLIAMENT  and PEOPLE

The public's view on law and order compared to the Government's are chalk and cheese more police and want them on the streets

They want tougher action on criminals and tougher sentences for most crimes.

In a poll a few years ago asking views on a sentencing escalator (repeat offenders given increasing harsh sentences for committing the same crime again)

90 per cent of the public were in favour.

So, are we doing that?

NO

Not only are we not, this government is now touting the idea that there should be a presumption against short sentences-possibly six months or fewer. You might have thought, "Great, we shall now get longer sentences-Alas, no, Short sentences will be replaced by

NO SENTENCES AT ALL

It is a ludicrous suggestion yet, with all eyes on

BREXIT

It is genuinely being pursued by the

[SO-CALLED]

Ministry of Justice.

Never mind the public, just ask police officers what they think, then brace yourself...

IT IS HARD TO GET SENT TO PRISON AS IT IS: YOU EITHER HAVE TO COMMIT A REALLY SERIOUS CRIME OR OFFEND SOMANY TIMES THAT THERE'S NO OTHER OPTION. SOMEONE MANAGED TO BE CONVICTED OF

62 SHOPLIFTING OFFENCES

BEFORE FINALLY BEING SENT TO

 JAIL.

OFFENDERS SENTENCED TO SIX MONTHS OR FEWER LAST YEAR HAD RACKED UP AN AVERAGE OF

55 previous offences each.

THEY HAD also received an average of five community orders, which clearly didn't work.

Around 2000 knife offenders received six months or fewer. In a knife crime epidemic, who in their right minds would not want to see these offenders in prison. At least, while they are serving their sentences

THEY ARE NOT CONTINUING OFFENDING.

THEN, there's overseas aid. We spend more on that than on policing and double what we spend on our

[SO-CALLED]

JUSTICE BUDGET

This money is fixeds, ring-fenced and

WILL ONLY INCREASE

People do not generally share politicians' desire to waste money as if it is going out of fashion to make themselves feel better.

To add insult to injury, people then hear of billions spent on ridiculous projects or syphoned off by corrupt officials. This happens in a department whose mission is to spend as much as possible so there can be a luvvie hug when we hit a random target. As with the overseas aid cult, there's the religion of

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which has a huge following in Parliament.

Many MPs are obsessed with tick boxes' so-called

POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION

They refuse to speak the truth for fear of upsetting minority groups and twist the facts to suit the agenda.

Heaven help anyone who challenges this cosy politically-correct concensus, I have tried.

Yet most people are fed up with political correctness. Hardly anyone identifies as a feminist. They just want men and women to be treated fairly and equally. But Parliament makes our laws and so politically correct tentacles spread.

These are key issues where Parliament is not representing our vies and I haven't even started on HS2. And we know many MPS think of voters who do not share their Left-wing or Remain views.

Being out of sync with the

PUBLIC

should be of grave concern. For a democracy to work, people have to feel that those in the Commons

SPEAK FOR THEM.

This isn't happening and MPs should fear the backlash that will come if this continues.

*  *  *

[Need we look elsewhere for the great problems we are experiencing at the present time to extract our once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

FROM

HITLER'S PLAN

FOR

GERMANY TO DOMINATE

EUROPE

IN THE

PEACE]

 

*

 

THE PUBLIC

HEY WANT MORE POLICE AND WANT THEM ON THE STREETS.

PREVIOUS PRIME MINISTERSW AND HOME SECRETARIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CARNAGE ON THE STREETS TODAY IN MARCH 2019.

 

[The EDP for decades has many bulletins showing how many important  public issues have and are still being ignored by successive governments. As the excellent article above has shown it is the dim-witted members of the House of Commons who have been there too long that has created this Mad Parliament feature. AS in Cromwell's Day the way to deal with the trash is to kick them out of Parliament. WE have advocated for decades that MPS should only SERVE THEIR COUNTRY for a TERM-at present 5 years. At present many MPs look on the job as for life which reflects in their arrogance and treasonable behaviour. The change will enable those who wish give up 5 years TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY instead of THEMSELVES  from across our society, to do so.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

SUNDAY EXPRESS

-Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies  MP
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

MARCH 10,2019

*  *  *

[A REMINDER! FROM THE PAST]

OF A COUNTRY RIDDLED WITH TREASON]

The EU’s control structure in Britain

The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.  An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside. This is not an exhaustive list.

The Bilderbergers – Europe wide

A society of 140 top politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state:  96%. All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.  This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader. They threw Margaret Thatcher out and replaced her with a compliant Bilderberger, John Major. Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), are Bilderbergers and work for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent. That is why your vote makes no difference.

Britain is the target

Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target. They know from our long history and two world wars the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. 

   For that reason the EU’s British sympathisers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.

    That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.

The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department

Controls development of the EU. Set up by Adolf Hitler in 1942, who created the EU as the EEC in 1940.  Recruits British politicians including

EDWARD HEATH

 

Geoffrey Rippon and Roy Jenkins

, and major British newspapers for the EU.  Some of our top politicians are DVD assets now (possibly Milliband, Brown, Blair), we may not know who until their deaths.

The Conservative Party

The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.  The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.   

    The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he lied). They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.

Labour and the Lib Dems

Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years. A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship. We have a one party state. Nigel Farage leader of UKIP and Nick Griffin of the BNP both work for the EU.

The Freemasons:

The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 active freemasons.  Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are. See http://www.bilde4rberger.org/masons.html

http://www.bilderberg,org/masons.html

 to find out.

(It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF).

The Legal Profession:

Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.  British justice is now utterly corrupt. See our August issue. Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime. They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.

Common Purpose:

The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved. Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.

   Common Purpose

 

 

have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.  Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £167 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.

 

Among all the above are about 30,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 "useful idiots "implementing the EU’s corruption, and feeding off its gravy train. But there are 62 million of us; we need to shake off their disinformation, realise the truth, and kick them all out of office. To stop these 55,000 fraudsters, we need just 10,000 of you.

David Noakes.

http://eutruth,org.uk.

 

H.F.1828

 

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

 

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

 

 

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with Londonistan (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

 The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

 Diversity in the UK

 A ranking of social evils 

Multiculturalism and truth

 Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

 The aims of Localism

 

 

 

 

 H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

 

 

 
 

A REMINDER FROM 2004

PETITION TO HM THE QUEEN

PETITION TO PARLIAMENT

 

PRINCIPLES OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION

 

1.  The British Constitution and Rule of Law are paramount and must be invariably upheld by all who bear allegiance to the Crown.

2.  No one is above the law.

3.  The authority of the Crown and Parliament is limited by the British Constitution

4.  No Government or Parliament has authority to;

a.   Place the Sovereign in breach of Her Coronation Oath and contract to rule according to our law and custom.

b.  Transfer British sovereignty to a foreign power that claims primacy over us.

5.  The Sovereign has power to refuse Royal Assent to any legislation that threatens, diminishes or surrenders the people’s sovereignty, their rights, liberties, customs and independence.

6.  The Sovereign has power to dissolve Parliament and call elections.

7.  The people have a right to petition the Sovereign and/or Parliament to obtain remedy and preserve the rule of law.

8.  In the event of failure by the Sovereign and/or Parliament to provide remedy to genuine grievance, or in the event of unlawful governance or legislation the people may withhold allegiance until a remedy has been secured.

 

 

DEFENDERS OF THE REALM

The New Battle For Britain

Southbank House, Black Prince Road, London SE1 7SJ

Tel. 0297 793 4049  Fax. 0207 463 2008

 

EURO-CONSTITUTION DUE TO BE IMPOSED

ON

JUNE 13TH 2004

 

     DO YOU KNOW THIS WILL SPELL THE END OF UK SELF – GOVERNMENT, THE MONARCHY AND OUR INDEPENDENCE?

  • DO YOU KNOW YOU ARE BEING DISENFRANCHISED AND BETRAYED BY OUR POLITICIANS?
  • DO YOU KNOW THAT YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR THE 2000 BILLION POUND PENSION DEFICIT IN EU COUNTRIES? THAT’S ON TOP OF OUR OWN 380 BILLION POUND DEFICIT.
  • ARE YOU WORRIED ABOUT OVERCROWDED SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS, TRAFFIC CONGESTION?  BUT DO YOU KNOW BY NEXT JUNE, 73 MILLION MORE EU CITIZENS WILL BE ELIGIBLE TO COME TO BRITAIN AND DRAW BENEFITS OR TAKE BRITISH JOBS?
  • DO YOU KNOW THIS EU-CON-STITUTION IS UNLAWFUL UNDER UK LAW
  • DO YOU KNOW YOU CAN HELP TO STOP THIS NONSENSE IF ENOUGH PEOPLE REFUSE TO ACCEPT UNLAWFUL DEMANDS?
  • IF YOU CARE ABOUT OUR COUNTRY’S FREEDOM, WILL YOU HELP DEFEND OUR RIGHTS & LIBERTIES AND INSIST THAT OUR OWN CONSTITUTION IS UPHELD? 
  •       THEN SUPPORT THE DEFENDERS OF THE REALM

 

Please contact us without delay for further information- we urgently need volunteers throughout the country to help raise funds, promote a national petition to the Queen and stand up for Britain.

 

Vice Presidents: Lord Morris, Edward Fox OBE, Norris Mcwhirter CBE, Chairman: John Gouriet. Directors: Robin de Crittenden, Roy Faiers- Treasurer, C.J.K. Arkell FTCA, Frederick Forsythe CBE, Legal Advisor: John Bingley.

EURO-CONSTITUTION DUE TO BE IMPOSED

ON

JUNE 13TH 2004

 

H.F.700/1
 
 

The EU's imploding as nation after nation turns to the ugly Far Right. But Brussels and Remainers just won't talk about it.

 
News for DAILY MAIL-The EU's imploding as nation after nation turns to the ugly far Right. But Brussels and Remainers just won't talk about it.

 

By Robert Hardman in Hungary- for the Daily Mail

November 22, 2017

The three young men waiting for a bus outside the Hungarian town of Perbal a few days ago so alarmed one local resident that he called the police.

Surely these were illegal migrants. However, they were anything but. They were students from Sri Lanka, working as volunteers at a home for the mentally disabled.

A minor misunderstanding, perhaps. Except that it is part of a familiar pattern. 

 

Viktor Orban, Hungary's Right-wing leader who has been accused of xenophobia and anti-anti-semitism over  his country's fight against EU migrant quotas

A few weeks earlier, death threats were sent to a man and his car tyres slashed after villagers complained that he was offering a family of migrants a free break at his motel.

International condemnation of this incident in Ocseny in southern Hungary was swift but the country’s Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, assured the villagers that they had his sympathy. 

But then, the Right-wing leader himself has been accused of xenophobia — and even anti-semitism — as a result of his government’s campaign against EU-imposed migrant quotas.

Such is the reality of life on the other side of the EU.

The EU leadership and the European Commission are far too preoccupied with political chaos in Germany and with Brexit to deal with a much greater threat to their grand European dream.

In Britain, bitter Remoaners are fighting a forlorn rearguard battle to try to stop Brexit and sneer at Leavers for their stupidity, seemingly oblivious to the convulsions in the east of the EU. 

Instead of a serene and harmonious Europe of Tuscan villas, Provencal markets, German opera and Bavarian beer halls, we are witnessing rancorous divisions over migration, economic stagnation and incipient independence movements.

And the bitter truth is that in Hungary, the Czech Republic and Poland, there is now a stridently anti-Brussels, anti-migrant and anti-Establishment movement with the increasingly angry peoples of these nations convinced they are being treated as second-class citizens. 

   

More from Robert Hardman for the Daily Mail...

This is a different Europe, too, which has never known multiculturalism and is in no mood to start embracing it now. 

Hence this month’s Independence Day celebrations in Warsaw featured a torch-lit procession by tens of thousands celebrating their ancient Christian heritage. They chanted ‘We want God’ and waved banners with messages such as ‘White Europe’.

Commentators less attuned to Polish traditions and history were quick to accuse these protesters of ‘fascism’. Here in Central Europe, though, the response has been different. According to Poland’s robustly nationalist government, it was ‘a great celebration of Poles’.

The same mood was reflected in the recent elections in Austria and the Czech Republic. Both countries have elected Right-wing Eurosceptic governments — in the wake of the sudden rise of the hard-Right Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD) in Germany.

Indeed, AfD emerged as the third-largest party in September’s elections — meaning Angela Merkel has been unable to form a government and is fighting for her political life.

Even in France, where this summer’s shock election victory by Emmanuel Macron’s centre-Left En Marche movement grabbed the headlines, the fact that the far-Right National Front gained ground while the grand old political party machines collapsed was all but ignored.

The ineluctable fact is that Europe is shifting to the Right. Which is why I am in Hungary, because it is the next EU nation to go to the polls and is emblematic of the new anti-Brussels mood in Central and Eastern Europe.

There is no chance of a lurch to the Right here, come April’s vote, because Hungary lurched that way long ago. Its leader is hated by liberal commentators — not least for the Trump-style border fence he has built to keep out migrants. 

But Orban, like Trump, couldn’t care less. He has no problem with being called ‘populist’, though he prefers the term ‘plebeian’. Even his friends call him ‘The Viktator’.

And he is well on course for victory in next spring’s election which will carry profound implications for Brussels.

Few doubt that Orban will be returned to power with anything less than an overall majority. Indeed, he is fast becoming the de facto leader of the alternative EU.

Predictably, just as the Brussels establishment belittled Brexiteers ahead of last summer’s EU referendum, it is now dismissing the Hungarian leader as an authoritarian Right-wing fruitcake. 

Jean-Claude Juncker, president of the European Commission, has called him a ‘dictator’ and gave him a half-joking slap on the cheek at an EU summit in 2015. 

The thirsty arch-Eurocrat has never forgotten that it was Orban and David Cameron who were the only EU leaders who dared to oppose his appointment.
 

Polish independence day celebrations were marred after far-Right supporters turned out in their hundreds in the capital Warsaw

 

While many in western Europe denounced the marchers as Fascists, at home the event was praised as 'a great celebration of Poles'

But you do not last as long as Orban (he’s already been PM for a total of 11 years) without shrewd political instincts. This former professional footballer — a God-fearing father of five who makes sausages by slaughtering his own pigs — had his first stint as prime minister as long ago as 1998.

He made his name as a young firebrand bravely demanding multi-party elections in Hungary while the Iron Curtain was still standing. Those who like to paint Central Europe’s dramatic turn to the Right as a dark reprise of Germany in the Thirties are missing the point.

No, what goes to the core of Orban’s political DNA — and the current shift across the whole East European region — is a hatred of communism. These are people who remember living under a totalitarian empire less than 30 years ago. Many now regard Brussels and its unelected Commission and unaccountable courts as the new Moscow.

John O’Sullivan, former speechwriter for Margaret Thatcher and now president of the Budapest-based think tank the Danube Institute, says that outsiders fail to understand how deep the scars of communism go.

His biography of Orban recounts how, significantly, the politician was arrested in 1988 as he tried to create his movement. He says Orban’s experience of life under Communist rule has made him ‘much more critical of elites the higher he has risen.’

Indeed, Orban’s great modern heroes are those who brought about the pulling down of the Berlin Wall in 1989 — notably German chancellor Helmut Kohl, US president Ronald Reagan and Thatcher. It is a popular sentiment around here, as I discover in Budapest’s Liberty Square where Orban has erected a bronze statue of Reagan.

Looking closely, I see it is in need of repair. A crack has now turned into a hole in Reagan’s outstretched hand — because so many people come here to shake it. 

If Orban and his Fidesz party win a fourth term, as everyone expects, the old European elite can no longer dismiss what is happening here as mere ‘populism’. A clear dividing line now runs from the Baltic to the Danube and the Black Sea.

On one side are the EU’s wealthier, liberal, multicultural nations such as France and Germany (where, in 2015, Merkel controversially — and to her bitter cost — invited more than a million refugees).

On the other are those whose democracies are, in most cases, virtually brand new — the so-called Borscht Belt, the Goulash Gang, call them what you will — whose social outlook on everything from gay rights to immigration is very different.

In last month’s Czech elections, an Islamophobic party which urged voters to walk pigs past a mosque to protect what it called the country’s ‘democratic way of life and the heritage of our ancestors from Islam’ won 10.7 per cent of the vote. (That is a great deal more than the 7.4 per cent achieved by the Lib Dems in Britain four months earlier.)

The default response in the Western half of Europe is to demand that these ghastly people become better Europeans. But the fact is that these ghastly people are no longer afraid of squaring up to Brussels.

Barely noticed, thanks to the general obsession with Brexit and Catalonia’s bid for independence, has been a recent summit of Central European leaders in the Slovakian capital, Bratislava. 
 

Germany's Angela Merkel is on the brink after coalition talks stalled following a general election which saw her party lose vote share

 

Merkel is being hounded by the AfD, a party founded by neo-Nazis which returned an historic share of the vote amid concerns over migration

It had been convened to tackle a festering cause of anger and injured pride. The specific indignity was the discovery that sub-standard foods had been exported to the former Eastern Bloc which had not been sold in Western Europe.

Orban’s government has described it as the ‘biggest scandal of the recent past’. Just imagine the protests and smashed windows in Scotland if Sainsbury’s was flogging sub-standard food north of the border but not in Surrey. The Bulgarian prime minister calls this ‘food apartheid’.

Although this controversy was about food, it symbolised to East Europeans how they were being abused by Brussels. 

Stung in to action, Brussels has promised to introduce a new food testing regime from next year. Too late. The damage has been done.

It is just yet another example of why Brussels-bashing is so prevalent to the east of the Alps, particularly here in Hungary.

For when Orban started building his razor wire fence along Hungary’s southern border during the migration crisis of 2015, he was roundly attacked.

Hundreds of thousands who had crossed from Turkey into Greece were heading West via Serbia and Hungary. Some were fleeing the Syrian civil war. But many were economic migrants.

Mrs Merkel was hailed as the ‘angel of Europe’ for saying that Germany would welcome the lot. For his part, Orban was branded the villain for closing the door. 

Today, the memory of the chaos of 2015 and subsequent terrorist incidents by Muslim extremists across Europe mean few here question Orban’s decision.

‘Migration is the big issue here, and the EU is now following Orban on migration,’ says Zsolt Jesenszky, a well-known Hungarian entrepreneur. ‘The Left were totally against the fence when it went up saying: “It won’t work”. And guess what? It works.’

Jesenszky, 45, says that the younger generations want leaders who stand up to Brussels, not people who go on bended knee.

‘Hungary likes a guy who stands up to the big bully,’ he says. ‘They’d never vote for a guy like Macron who spends a fortune on make-up.’ 

(Many here remember that the image-conscious French president, who spent £24,000 on a make-up artist in his first three months in office, has been a stern critic of Hungary and Poland.) 

But Orban is more than happy to be attacked by the ‘old’ nations of the EU because they are playing into his hands.

He has now consolidated his position by outflanking the notorious Hungarian nationalist movement Jobbik, infamous for its fascist uniforms and its anti-semitic, anti-gyspy rhetoric.

Jobbik has just performed a U-turn in search of votes from the Left. It is Orban and his Fidesz movement who are now playing the xenophobia card. 

Even some of his supporters think he has gone too far by leafletting eight million households and erecting posters as part of a campaign against Budapest-born billionaire George Soros.

They claim the 87-year-old gave Brussels a plan to flood Hungary with migrants in order to meet labour market needs and bolster the voter base of Left-wing groups.

Orban has ordered Hungary’s security services to investigate a so-called ‘Soros network’ which it is claimed is pulling strings in Brussels. As a result, Orban has been accused of anti-semitism for his demonisation of the great philanthropist.

Born into a Hungarian Jewish family shortly before the war, Soros only survived the German occupation of Budapest with the use of forged papers.

Though now based in America, Soros has been a very generous benefactor to countless Hungarians, having built the Central European University in Budapest. There, I met students and staff appalled to find themselves at the centre of political controversy.

Earlier this year, in a very disturbing development, Orban’s government introduced laws effectively forcing the university to re-apply for its licence to operate. That approval has still not been granted.

It is a bewildering situation. But the new mood in Central and East Europe has its roots in a proud nationalism that Brussels, for years, has tried to marginalise with its vision of a European super-state.

There’s a message for Britain, too. Perhaps all those Remoaners accusing the Brexiteers of being blinkered little Englanders should open their eyes and look at just how rotten much of the EU is now.

 


 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5106147/EU-implodes-nation-nation-turns-far-Right.html#ixzz4zFdkhhrD
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Full article

November 22, 2017

*  *  *

H.F.1390-  ONLY A STEADFAST AND UNYIELDING APPROACH TO THE BEAST IN BRUSSELS WILL WIN OUR INDEPENDENCE DAY WITH OUR ASSUSTOMED HONOUR AND DIGNITY IN PLACE.

*  *  *

 

THE TRUTH that BRUSSELS cannot BEAR: PEOPLE CRAVE NATIONAL IDENTITY.

By Stephen Glover for the Daily Mail

 3 October 2017

What happened in Catalonia on Sunday was shaming and shocking in a modern European state. Spanish police bludgeoned and assaulted defenceless civilians who were simply trying to exercise their democratic right.

First and foremost, this is a terrible crisis for the wrong-headed, bully-boy government in Madrid. After the unedifying spectacle of police attacking blameless voters, the chances must surely have increased of Catalonia – Spain’s most prosperous region with some 7.5million inhabitants – seceding.

But it is also an enormous crisis for the European Union, which in recent weeks has said almost nothing as the Spanish authorities arrested officials arranging an independence referendum on behalf of the devolved Catalan government.

 

 

RELATED ARTICLES


 

One reason he did not do so in the case of Spain is that it is one of the most obedient pro-EU countries in Europe, which seldom defies the will of Brussels, or causes trouble for Juncker and his ilk.

But there is an even deeper reason for the Commission’s silence. The events in Catalonia challenge at a deep level its project for ever closer union, about which both Juncker and President Emmanuel Macron of France have ventilated in recent weeks.

For how can there be an amicable union between the EU’s nation states if some of those nations are themselves deeply divided and fractious, as is plainly the case with Catalonia and Spain?

Here is a region of largely Catalan-speaking people who regard themselves as culturally distinct. A sizeable proportion of them yearn to break free from Spain, even though Catalonia has been part of the country for hundreds of years.

Sunday’s vote illuminates a truth which Brussels cannot bear. There are many people in Europe for whom the atavistic call of identity counts far more than any exhortation about forging a European superstate

That, after all, was one of the main messages of Brexit – that the majority of voters in our own ancient nation resent the undemocratic control of Brussels, and have no wish to be sucked into a united Europe.

For Brussels, the example of Britain was bad enough, and it has set about trying to punish us for having had the effrontery to want to leave. In a sense, the demonstration of Catalan nationalism is even more alarming to the federalists because this show of independence is happening inside one of the EU’s nation states.

How is it possible, they wonder, for the pan-European project to proceed if some EU countries are in danger of fracturing? The terror in Brussels is that if Catalonia were allowed to break away, regions in other member states could follow suit. Instead of coalescing into an amorphous whole, some EU nations might fall apart.

Belgium, whose capital, Brussels, is the seat of EU expansionism, is divided. The Flemish-speaking region of Flanders, which constitutes about 60 per cent of the country’s population, is at daggers drawn with the French-speaking minority.

Many people in northern Italy long to be rid of the impoverished south, which is relatively unproductive and, in the view of northerners, consumes more than its fair share of government spending. The Right-wing Northern League has campaigned with some success for independence for the north, and imagines a separate country called Padania.

France faces an independence movement in the island of Corsica. Meanwhile the cohesion of Spain is threatened not just by free-spirited Catalans but also by militant Basques, part of whose territory lies in France.

Romania and Slovakia both have unhappy Hungarian minorities. Even in Poland’s region of Silesia, much of which used to be ruled by Germany until 1945, there are stirrings of an independence movement.

All over Europe apparently unified countries are harried by breakaway groups which have a strong sense of separate identity. If Catalonia were allowed to go it alone, who knows what might come next?
 

The problem for Brussels is that it is used to dealing with individual nation states but is powerless to intervene in unruly regions. That is why the Commission has remained so quiet in the case of Catalonia apart from expressing a few words of solidarity with Spain.

By the way, the British response has been regrettably supine. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson stressed his support for the Spanish government in a tweet. As the leading Brexiteer he should surely have been more critical of Madrid’s use of violence.

The Spanish government, it must be said, has behaved rashly and brutishly. Arguably some Catalan separatist political parties have been unwise in deliberately engineering a confrontation.

But given that the Catalan government had made numerous requests to hold a referendum on independence – after Spain’s constitutional court had controversially declared in 2010 that Catalonia was not a nation – what was it to do having been rebuffed time and time again? If it had possessed a modicum of good sense, the Spanish government would have allowed the referendum to go ahead. Had the vote been in favour of independence, it could have then questioned its legal status.

But to arrest Catalan officials, to close a large number of polling stations, and then to clobber innocent voters were acts of unbelievable stupidity as well as nastiness.

It passes understanding how the prime minister of Spain, Mariano Rajoy, can say that democracy has prevailed. The opposite is true.

Imagine if two or three years hence the Scottish National Party’s Nicola Sturgeon were to hold a referendum without the approval of Westminster – by no means an unthinkable eventuality.

In fact, her case would be much weaker than that of the Catalan government since there has already been one legal referendum in Scotland in 2014, which was said by the SNP leader Alex Salmond at the time to be the last for a generation.

Even so, it is inconceivable that a new unofficial referendum in Scotland would be met by the authorities in Westminster with police wielding batons and firing rubber bullets. Such a wild over-reaction would inevitably give a boost to Scottish nationalism – as, I have no doubt, the cause of Catalan nationalism will have benefited from Sunday’s onslaught.

The truth is that the Spanish state has a very restricted conception of democracy. We should know that already from its desire to shoehorn Gibraltar into Spain despite 99 per cent of its citizens having voted in a 2002 referendum to remain British.

God alone knows what will happen now in Catalonia. Unless the Spanish government agrees to an official referendum – an unlikely prospect – there will probably be deadlock. I am afraid there is also the possibility of more violence on both sides.

Justifying and supporting the Madrid government is the European Commission in all its absurdity, dreaming dreams of a union which the people of Europe do not want. It will do its utmost to ensure that Catalonia doesn’t interfere with its grandiose scheme.

Will Remainers look at Catalonia and reflect that we have a quieter and more civilised way of dealing with our differences in this country? I don’t know. What I do know is that every day I am ever more relieved that we are leaving this misguided club.
Full article
 


 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4942684/STEPHEN-GLOVER-truth-national-identity.html#ixzz4uYWX4q7V
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

 

92

View
comments

 

H.F.1332 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU
 
DAILY MAIL

-QUENTIN LETTS-

 

BRITAIN'S

100 DAY REVOLUTION

 

 

OCTOBER 1-  2016

 

H.F.990 BREXIT NOW
 

[AT LONG! LONG! LAST!

- WE LEAVE

THE

CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-GODLESS EU

 IN MARCH 2019.]

*

DAILY MAIL

-At last, Hammond's on board with

BREXIT

and the

REMOANERS are DEAD and BURIED

LEAVING THE EU

 IN

MARCH,2019

 

 

THE

DOMINIC

LAWSON

Column

 

By DOMINIC LAWSON

 

Finally, it’s sorted. Until yesterday, the anti-Brexiteers known as Remoaners had high hopes of Philip Hammond, the Chancellor.

But yesterday he appeared as joint author of a newspaper article with the most adamantine Brexiteer in the Cabinet, the International Trade Secretary Dr Liam Fox. The two supposed foes declared that in March 2019, Britain would not just be leaving the EU but also ‘we will leave the Customs Union and be free to negotiate the best trade deals around the world as an independent, open, trading nation’.

Although the Cabinet Brexiteers were content with Hammond’s proposal that there should be a transition period after March 2019, pending a final settlement of the country’s arrangements with the EU, the Chancellor had given the impression he was bending to the demands of the CBI that Britain remain within the Customs Union during that unspecified period.

Blunder

This they regarded as a fatal blunder — and not just because they suspected the CBI (which had campaigned for Britain to give up sterling for the euro) of seeking to keep the UK in the EU ‘by the back door’.

As Shanker Singham, chairman of the special trade commission of the Legatum Institute (a group consulted regularly by the Government), warned last week: ‘The UK must be able to provide the clarity of being outside the Customs Union on Day 1 of Brexit.

If such clarity does not exist, then other countries will not think the UK is serious about executing an independent trade policy and they will quickly lose patience and move on.’...

...In any case, the nation has not changed its collective mind since the referendum in June 2016. If anything, views have hardened in the direction set by the result. A survey of 3,293 people published on Friday by the London School of Economics showed that even those who had voted ‘Remain’ would prefer the sort of Brexit deal the LSE’s team described as ‘hard’.

A total of 51.3 per cent of Remain voters backed a Brexit deal which delivered ‘full control’ over immigration and led to lower numbers of migrants from the EU. No fewer than 54.7 per cent of Remainers said that the UK should ‘pay nothing’ to the EU by means of a ‘divorce bill’.

And 52.2 per cent of Remainers told the LSE researchers that we should entirely free British law from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Unsurprisingly, a still higher proportion of self-identifying ‘Leave’ voters supported what the LSE termed

His statement on The Andrew Marr Show last month that failure to reach an amicable deal with the EU ‘would be a very, very bad outcome for Britain’ was seen as an attack on his Brexiteer colleagues in the Cabinet (and, indeed, on the Prime Minister).

‘hard Brexit’.

Monstrous

This clearly disappointed the most voluble critic of the Brexiteers on the Tory parliamentary benches, Anna Soubry. In her own newspaper article yesterday, she lamented ‘a sense of resignation among most people who voted Remain that we have to “man up” and make the most of what we know will be a rotten Brexit’...

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4787508/At-Hammond-s-board-Brexit.html#ixzz4pkbL1fqi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

[ LAST MONTH AS PRISONERS OF THE

FOURTH REICH

THEN

TO REGAIN OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

AUGUST 14, 2017

H.F.1281 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

  SEP-19

OCT-19

 

 

 
 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

      9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA
LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND
SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND
100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

 THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

*

 THE DOWNFALL

OF

A ONCE DECLARED

 IRON LADY

AND

HER ARDENT AND PASSIONATE PROMISE

 IN 2016

 

'BETTER A

NO DEAL

THAN A BAD DEAL'

*

'BREXIT MEANS BREXIT'

*

'TO LEAVE

THE EU

ON

MARCH 29,2019'

AS we had previously stated

COMPROMISE

should never be considered

when the return of our ancient freedoms given away by a so-called

 CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT

IN

 1972

to be reclaimed in

March 2019

in answer to a people's vote in a

REFERENDUM

 in

JUNE 2O16

 

when an overwhelming

17.4 MILLION PATRIOTS

VOTED FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE

FREE COUNTRY

FROM THE CRUMBLING

CONFIDENCE TRICK

calling itself the

EUROPEAN UNION

soon to be a

SUPERSTATE

*

A great historian has observed,-

'That honesty is the best policy, is a maxim which we firmly believe to be generally correct, even with respect to the temporal interest of individuals; but with respect to societies, the rule is subject to still fewer exceptions, and that for this reason, that the life of societies is larger than individuals.  It is possible to mention men who have owed great worldly prosperity to breaches of private faith: but we doubt whether it is possible to mention a state which has, on the whole, been a gainer by a breach of public faith.,'

[We all know politicians since we have been in Hitler's so-called European Union who fit this bill. Many have gained abundant riches and have left the People to suffer the consequences of their wicked deeds of death and destruction... and the result is clearly demonstrated further by the actions of many Remainer MPs who have decided not to keep their promise to accept the result of the People's referendum of June, 2016, which they sanctioned; which is a derogation of their duty to their constituents-a clear breach of political accountability to those they serve.]

August 8,2019

H.F.1424

'Trust not him that has broken faith.'

SHAKESPEARE

*
 Could the European elections herald the end of the EU - Eurosceptic parties all across the EU look like doing well!.... - Daily Express

https://www.express.co.uk/.../expresscomment/.../european-election-2019-vote-end-eu-comment-ross-clark
‎
 *
 AGITATION
Agitation prevents rebellion, keeps the peace, and secures progress. Every step she gains is gained forever. Muskets are the weapons of animals. Agitation is the atmosphere of the brains.-
Wendell Phillips. Am.orator

*
 Eurosceptics are fighting for the return of freedoms once secured by MAGNA CARTA and the PETITION of RIGHT.
 

 

 

Benjamin Fulford 5-27-19… “As Theresa May loses battle of Britain,

 West Coast oligarchs sue for peace”

Posted on 2019/05/27 by

New weekly report from Ben. All I will add here is that this one is extremely fascinating. Suggest “holding on to hat”, if wearing one.

“The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

“…U.S. President Donald Trump has spent the Memorial Day weekend in Japan, in part to avoid assassination as moves begin to end the long political deadlock in Washington, D.C., Pentagon and Japanese right-wing sources say.

“…why the resignation of May is crucial to breaking the political deadlock… in 2016 the Rockefeller / Clinton oligarchs asked their Rothschild counterparts in the UK to circumvent U.S. law in order to spy on Trump and concoct the Russiagate scandal to impeach him. May’s resignation means the British Nazi…-allied oligarchs who fought against Trump are now all being purged from the British military / intelligence / political power structure, according to British royal family sources. This purge will be accompanied by a similar purge in the U.S.”

As Theresa May loses battle of Britain, West Coast oligarchs sue for peace
 By Benjamin Fulford, White Dragon Society, May 27, 2019

The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

May 27, 2019

 

H.F.1853/1

 

 

H.F.1849

*

[A REMINDER OF A SOLEMN PROMISE!]

 

FROM JANUARY 18,2017

 

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 
  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
    •
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britain would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro

By James Slack Political Editor For The Daily Mail



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

Brexit will let us rediscover role as trading power | Daily Mail Online

Theresa May's Brexit speech puts Cameron to shame | Daily Mail ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Commons and Lords get ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Full reports and analysis

 

A great nation is reborn: Quitting will let us rediscover our role as a ...

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.
 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

  WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

  WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

  WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

  

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

 *		 7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

  WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

  WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW
Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RELAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANC.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

It's delicious to see the naysayers who predicted disaster after a Brexit vote face reality, writes ALEX BRUMMER
  • The economy's resilience since the Brexit vote has been evident for some time
  • But few Remainers have admitted the scare stories put about were inaccurate
  • Lord O'Neill was a Treasury minister under Project Fear's George Osborne
  • In a bold mea culpa, he has now said Britain's economy will reap the benefits

By Alex Brummer for the Daily Mail

 January 23, 2018

The extraordinary resilience of the British economy since the Brexit vote in June 2016 has been evident for some time.

Predictably, though, few Remain supporters and economists have admitted that the scare stories put about as part of Project Fear – such as a big downturn in output, the necessity of an emergency Budget and years (or decades) of hardship – were wildly inaccurate.

So we must heartily applaud the honesty of Lord O'Neill, a very vocal pro-EU businessman who was a Treasury minister under Project Fear's architect George Osborne.

In a bold mea culpa, the former chief economist at investment bank Goldman Sachs says Britain's economy will reap the benefits of a robust global expansion and this will 'easily dwarf' any damage caused by our departure from the EU.

Scroll down for video 

 

Few Remain supporters and economists have admitted that the scare stories put about as part of Project Fear were wildly inaccurate. So we must heartily applaud the honesty of Lord O'Neill (pictured second from right)

Lord O'Neill knows what he is talking about when it comes to the international economy.

He made his name 17 years ago by coining the acronym BRIC for the fast-developing countries Brazil, Russia, India and China, which he predicted would overtake the six strongest western nations in terms of economic might.

In the main, the BRIC nations are booming and, with other newly rich countries, account for 57 per cent of world output.

What the Brexit doom-mongers irresponsibly failed to anticipate was that the US economy would enjoy a spurt of growth and that there would be stirrings of recovery in the EU – both, in turn, helping Britain.

Experts say there has been a 'synchronised recovery', when the world's major economic blocs expand at the same time.

What is often forgotten is that the US is Britain's biggest trading partner – a market in which we have a trade surplus of almost £40billion a year.

Labour politicians such as London mayor Sadiq Khan may deplore Donald Trump, but they foolishly ignore how his big tax cuts for businesses will boost the US economy.
 

Labour politicians such as London mayor Sadiq Khan may deplore Donald Trump, but they foolishly ignore how his big tax cuts for businesses will boost the US economy

Yesterday, the International Monetary Fund said the cuts would turbo-charge American and global growth for years, adding up to 1.2 per cent a year to US output.

This will raise global expansion to 3.9 per cent this year and next year. The IMF said US growth would rise from a previously predicted 2.3 per cent for 2018 to 2.7pc, and raised its forecast for 2019 from 1.9 per cent to 2.5 per cent. 

Here, a more competitive exchange rate (following the devaluation of sterling in the aftermath of the Leave vote, which made UK goods and services cheaper overseas), and the impressive global strength of our services sector has helped Britain thrive.

How delicious it is for Brexiteers to see these doom-mongers forced to recognise a reality they tried to trash.

Prime among these was Christine Lagarde, the French head of the IMF, who shamefully signed up to Project Fear and warned that if Britain voted for Brexit, it would be 'pretty bad, to very, very bad' for the UK.
 

How delicious it is for Brexiteers to see these doom-mongers forced to recognise a reality they tried to trash. Prime among these was Christine Lagarde (pictured), the French head of the IMF, who shamefully signed up to Project Fear

Embarrassingly for Madame Lagarde, the IMF now suggests Britain's economy will grow by 1.5 per cent this year – faster than Japan's or Italy's.

Even though Lord O'Neill still thinks the Leave vote was a 'weird thing for the UK to impose upon itself', he now concedes our economy was more robust than he had thought. The jobs market has improved, with an unemployment rate of 4.3 per cent of the workforce being the lowest for 42 years. Companies do not take on more workers unless they see strong economic prospects.

Productivity – the measure of workers' output – also jumped in December by its highest level for six years.

In general, British businesses are in a confident mood.

Carolyn Fairbairn, the strongly pro-EU boss of the employers' organisation the CBI, may be in despair about the Government's Brexit policy, but a recent survey of her members in the manufacturing sector found that orders for goods were at the highest level for three decades and exports orders at their best for two decades.
 

For too long, the British people have been forced to endure a cacophony of gloom from anti-Brexiteers

To his credit, Lord O'Neill (once minister for the Northern Powerhouse – Osborne's vision of an economic region to rival London and the South East) says parts of the UK, particularly the North West, are 'doing better than people realise'.

His is the rare voice of a Remainer who repents, admitting that the economy has bounced back from the financial crash of 2008 and is expanding despite the squeeze on household income caused by higher import prices.

For too long, the British people have been forced to endure a cacophony of gloom from anti-Brexiteers.

But the facts must be allowed to speak for themselves: Output and exports up, more jobs, and international experts predicting above-average growth.

There is still a long way to go until Brexit works itself out, but voters deserve honesty rather than the persistent dishonesty and apocalyptic warnings of the agents of Project Fear.

 

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5300335/Its-delicious-Brexit-naysayers-face-reality.html#ixzz55mYNgUMe
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 January 23, 2018

 

H.F.1458
 
 

A REMINDER!-IF YOU NEED IT!

101 REASONS FOR LEAVING THE EU

 

PART 1

 

We wish to express our indebtedness and gratitude to those who in books and articles have sought to alert the Nation to its Danger, and whose observations are reflected or summarised here: in particular,

 

Rodney Atkinson and Norris McWhirter

for Treason at Maastricht

 

Adrian Hilton for The Principality and Power of Europe

 

Lindsay Jenkins for The Last Days of Britain

And

 

For the late Lord Shore of Stepney’s

Separate Ways

 

Copies of this booklet can be obtained from the Publishers -Priced £1.20 incl p&p

 

St Mathew Publishing Ltd

24 Geldart St.

Cambridge

Tel: 01223 504871 Fax: 01223 512304

 

*

 

1. hush up

 

Cabinet papers pre - 1970 show the Heath government to have had full knowledge of the EEC being a long -term plan for the unitary European State with its own Currency; but the facts were suppressed by this and succeeding governments with the Deliberate intention of keeping the Nation in the dark

 

1.         ‘surrenders of sovereignty’’

 

On 14th December 1960 the Lord Chancellor,

Lord Kilmuir,

Britain’s senior legal officer, warned Edward Heath of the implications of signing the Treaty of Rome:

‘’ To satisfy the requirements of the treaty, Parliament could enact legislation which would give automatic force of Law to any existing or future regulations made by… the Community…It is clear that the Council of Ministers could make regulations which would be binding on us even against our wishes… It is the first step on the road, which leads… to the federal state… I must emphasise that in my view the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serious ones…these objections ought to be brought out into the open.

 

2.         ‘end of Britain’’

 

That the consequences of membership had been realised by some at Westminster about this time is apparent from a speech in 1962 by Hugh Gaitskell, leader of the Labour party, who rightly identifying ‘’ the desire of those, who created the European Community, for a political federation. That is what they mean, that is what they offer’’, added that this would bring about the end of Britain as an independent [Nation State]…the end of a thousand years of history.

 

3.         the big lie

 

Edward Heath’s 1971 White Paper on joining the EEC deceived Parliament and the People with its false statements that’’ there is no question of any erosion of essential sovereignty’’, and that Britain’s Sovereignty would somehow be ‘’enlarged’’ by ‘sharing’’

 

4.         ministry of propaganda

 

Between 1970 and 1972 the Heath Government directed a secret propaganda offensive, known as the Connaught Breakfasts, in which Cabinet Ministers, Foreign Heads of Department, civil servants, media managers and journalists, in conjunction with the European Movement, carried on TV, radio and newspaper campaign to swing round strongly opposed public opinion to acceptance of the EEC, public money being used in the process.

 

5.         unconstitutional…1

 

The 1972 Act which took Britain into the EEC was in breach of the Constitution, in that the Government allowed no prior consultation of the electorate by special General Election or Referendum, as is required under the Constitution for Parliamentary measures involving Constitutional Change, the precedents being those of 1831/2 and 1910.

 

 

7. unconstitutional…2

 

By passing the 1972 European Communities Act, Parliament unconstitutionally attempted to renounce its legal Sovereignty, so as to make the British People subject to enactments of outside agencies, and ending its own ability to put into effect the expressed wishes of the Electorate.

 

8. unconstitutional…3

 

In doing so, it deliberately and wrongfully denied the, ultimate Sovereignty of the People, of which Parliament is Constitutionally both Servant and Defender and which at the end of each Parliament’s term is returned to its Possessors.

 

9.                     unconstitutional…4

 

It is the Corner Stone of the Constitution that no Parliament is or can be bound by enactments of its predecessors; but the Act of 1972 unconstitutionally purported (Section 2.4) to be mandatory upon all succeeding Parliaments.

   

10.               unconstitutional…5

  

The Act of 1972 is unconstitutional in the wider respect that falsehood and deception was employed to secure its enactment, contrary not only to the spirit of the Constitution but of all procedure whatsoever.

 

11. test case

 

The Metric Martyrs’ appeal against their conviction is based on the fact that the 1985 Imperial Weights &Measures Act, which permits trading in pounds and ounces, constitutionally takes precedence over the earlier Act of 1972 which made us members of the EU; and it is thus a test case not only between British and EU law, but of whether the 1972 Act can have abrogated the Constitution.

 

12.indestructible

 

Any supposition that the Act in some sense annulled the Constitution is untenable, since (apart from the 1972 Act itself being unconstitutional both in its content and process of enactment) the unique unwritten British Constitution is not law, but essentially an honoured undertaking and consensus in those who have created and live under it as to the proper conduct of Parliamentary affairs, and thus incapable of being set aside by legal means.

 

13. … twilight hour?

 

By subjecting the British people to decrees other than the laws enacted by their own legislature, the Act contravened the undertaking in the Coronation Oath ‘’ to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom according to their laws and customs’’; the provisions of the treason Act 1795, against engaging in actions ‘’tending to the overthrow of the laws, government and happy constitution’’ of the United Kingdom, and those of the Treason Felony Act of 1848 condemning ant who attempt to ‘’ deprive or depose our most gracious Lady the Queen from the style, honour or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom’’; and the Privy Councillor's Oath ‘’ To bear faith and allegiance to the Crown and defend its jurisdiction and power against all foreign…persons…or states.’’

 

14. royal commoner

 

Allegiance to H.M. the Queen is in effect allegiance to Brussels, since through the Queen’s EU citizenship and accountability in her own courts to superior EU law, Her Majesty has vassal status, and an Oath of Allegiance to her now stands’ subject to the Commission’s tolerance’’ so long as she and her Nation do not show themselves disloyal to the sovereignty of the European Union.

 

 

15. unconstitutionality

 

The chief reason for the Labour government’s calling a Referendum in 1975 was the unconstitutionality of the European Communities

 

16. bizarre

A retrospective Referendum upon an Act of Parliament was without precedent in British history, and partook of the nature of inertia salesmanship, especially since accompanied by the dispatching of government literature to every household with the disinformation that the Act had been purely a free trade agreement, and urging a ‘Yes’ vote; a species of official activity also without precedent, and just as questionable.

 

17. the great divide

Britain’s becoming and remaining a member of the EU, and the methods employed to his end, resulted from the emergence of what Lord Goodhart memorably described as ‘’ a political establishment’’ with purposes disturbingly opposed to the wish of the electorate; his book ‘Full-Hearted Consent (1976) ironically gaining its title from Mr Heath’s assurance during the 1970 General Election campaign that, if there were a future possibility of entering the EEC, no government would take their nation into it’’ without the full-hearted consent of Parliament and the People.

 

18. vote as EU please

 

The political establishment’s continuing activities have brought about a new situation, new to British politics, in which the widespread public hostility to the EU’s increasing encroachments is denied party political expression, the policies of the major parties all being favourable to membership.

 

19. polling days

 

In a nationwide MORI opinion poll carried out on behalf of the British Democracy Campaign 15-21 March, 2001, in which 1805 adult respondents were questioned face to face in their homes, 52% of these offered an opinion declared themselves in favour of leaving the EU now, 71% wanted a Referendum on continued membership, and 75% considered that the British people had not received sufficient information on the implications of the EU.

 

20. mobile goalposts

 

Through the deeper irregularity of its plan to proceed by stealth through a series of treaties until the European State was a fait accompli before its populations had come to realise what was going on, the EU has developed into a concept and institution far other than what was voted on in 1975 Referendum, and so without democratic validation in this as in other countries.

 

 

21. undemocratic

 

The European Union is an unrepresentative and authoritarian institution, by virtue of the fact that the members of the legislative (Council of Ministers) and its executive (Commission) are not directly elected by and responsible to the voters of a EU constituency.

 

22. non-accountable

 

The EU Council of Ministers is composed of the non-dismissible nominees of the governments of member states, who are thus removed from democratic accountability.

 

23. horse-trading

 

Britain’s voice in the Council is one amongst many; and policy decisions, as the outcome of conflict of interests and pressures resolved by bargaining, by no means necessarily correspond to Britain’s needs and the wishes of its electorate.

 

24. cabal

 

The Council, more strictly the legislative body, and the Commission, which with its executive roll also issues legislative proposals, both meet in secret; and since the fifty or so persons who compose the two have not been elected to European government functions, and in carrying them out are accountable to no-one, they constitutes, not a legislative, but a ruling oligarchy.

 

25. big brothers

 

Though the EU Commission are unelected appointees without democratic mandate or accountability, they have power to impose directives and regulations by by-passing the legislatures of democratic states.

 

26. the parliament: authority

 

Whereas the British Cabinet is constitutionally answerable to Parliament in Westminster, where a government defeat on a motion of no confidence involves a Dissolution and General Election, the European Union’s Parliament, so called, is entirely without such control over the Commission, which is effectively the EU Cabinet.

 

27. the parliament: finance

 

From its earlier days to the present, what has been confirmed the Westminster Parliament’s power has been its direction of finance; but the EU Parliament is without a corresponding capacity?

 

28. the parliament: legislation

 

Unlike all the other parliaments in the Western tradition, the EU Parliament is unable to legislate, its functions being merely to review and agree measures drawn up by the Commission, and thereby to have virtually no legislative role.

 

29 the parliament veto

 

Nor does the Parliament have a final veto over Commission regulations and directives, since through the procedure euphemistically named ‘’Conciliation’’, the Commission can at its will override any negative vote.

 

30. façade

 

The word ‘’Parliament’’ is thus a misnomer for what is little more than a rubber-stamp or puppet agency; but the democratic election of its members creates the dangerous illusion of democracy being at work, in what is in essence an authoritarian regime.

 

31.      inferior government

 

Through its membership of the EU, Britain is being subjected to a species of non-representative, non-democratic, authoritarian government far inferior to that which prevailed at Westminster until 1973, and having features reminiscent of the dictatorial systems which flourished on the continent of Europe in the not very distant past.

 

32.      12-star chamber?

 

The European Court of Justice, whose members are appointed by the various governments, is the supreme arbiter on EU law, with power to overrule the laws of member states; but being charged under the Treaty of Rome with ensuring that provisions of all the EU treaties, and the principle of ‘’ever closer union’’, are observed, and in its own words devoted to ‘’overcoming the resistance of national governments to European integration’’, it is politically predisposed and active in a manner incompatible with judicial impartiality.

 

33.      moot points

 

EU treaties and regulations are generally cast in such obscure language that all wishing to be sure where they stand will be forced to go to the European Court of Justice: so that it will become an absolute source of political authority, and the European State be unassailably dominant over the former nations now its provinces.

 

34.      EU rules OK

 

EU law, as conveyed by the treaties, regulations and directives, and decrees and rulings of the European Court, are accepted by British courts as taking precedence over national law, the ECJ having declared that ‘’Every national court must apply Community law in its entirety and must accordingly set aside any provision of national law which may conflict with it, whether prior or subsequent to this Community rule’’ (ECR 629 at 643,644).

 

35.      ‘’tidal wave’’

 

The result is that the British Statute and Common law are being superseded, and law-making has become primarily the prerogative of the European Union, which has been described by a British judge as ‘’a bold new source of law’’, and whose legislation, according to the late Lord Denning, a former Master of the Rolls, is no longer’’ an incoming tide flowing up the estuaries of England’’, but’’ now like a tidal wave bringing down sea walls and flowing inland over our fields and houses, to the dismay of us all’’ (quoted in the Times, 1st April 1996).

 

 

 

36. corpus juris

 

In place of existing laws in the member countries, there will have been instituted under the European State the Corpus Juris, a body of law largely in accordance with continental legal systems, deriving from three main sources: the Corpus Juris Civilis of the Roman Emperor Justinian, Inquisition law, and the Code Napoleon

 

37. euro state prosecutor

 

Corpus Juris is to be administered by the European State Prosecutor, and operate through European courts and trans-national police and the courts and police forces of member states, so combining police and prosecution into one entity

 

38. continental menu

 

Judicial procedure is to be as already in practice on the Continent, the European State Prosecutor having responsibility for investigation, arrest, committal to trial, presentation of the prosecution case in court, judgment and imposition of sentence, trial taking place before an inquisitorial judge and two professional assessors: the State, in effect, both judge and jury.

 

39. … innocent? Prove it!

 

Also as on the Continent, the concept of presumed innocence will disappear, and it will become the responsibility of the accused to prove his innocence to the court, contrary to the position under English law, where the burden of proof rests with the prosecution, and the accused is innocent unless and until proved guilty.

 

40.                   goodbye, Habeas Corpus

 

Corpus Juris will quash the right of Habeas Corpus, instituted in 1215 by Magna Carta  (article 39), by which it is granted in perpetuity to all subjects of the monarch that no-one should suffer the loss of liberty without evidence warranting his further detention being established in a court hearing, normally within 48 hours of his arrest.

 

41. farewell, trial by jury

 

Corpus Juris will similarly abolish the right of trial by jury, whose beginnings date from as early as 1166 in the reign of Henry 11, through which the question of a person’s innocence or guilt is determined by twelve of his peers, not by the judiciary, a practice which, because of a jury’s freedom to acquit a person technically guilty under an unjust decree, ensures that laws made by the state are always acceptable to the people, and that government pressure upon, or corruption of, the judiciary shall never be able to affect the impartial administration of justice.

 

42. ‘ the test of civilisation’’

 

In a Minute to the Home Secretary of 21st November, 1943, Winston Churchill observed: ‘’The great principles of Habeas Corpus and trial by jury… are the supreme protection invented by the British people for ordinary individuals against the State… The power of the executive to cast a man in prison without formulating any charge known to law for an indefinite period, is in the highest decree odious, and is the foundation for all totalitarian governments… Nothing can be more abhorrent to democracy. This is really the test of civilisation.’’

 

 

* * *

 

 

43. above the law

 

The European State’s judicial system involves the introduction of forces of armed police, whether members of Europol or of the paramilitary European border police in process of formation, enjoying diplomatic immunity from arrest, and thus above the law; unlike British police, who, while charged with enforcement of the, remain ordinary members of the public, themselves subject to the laws they uphold

 

44. clear enough

 

The reasons for the European State police’s immunity from the law have never been explained, though the parallel with the police forces of authoritarian regimes is manifest

 

45. just the start

 

Eurojust, the provisional EU public prosecution agency, which is closely linked to Europol, already has autonomous, non-accountable power to initiate investigations in every state of the European Union, Europol being able to order surveillance of any British person by letters, E-mail or ‘phone tapping, and to acquire upon demand secret intelligence from British security agencies M15 and M16.

 

46. affront

 

The concepts, provisions and methods of the judicial system of the emerging European State are legally and ethically inferior to the system of British justice admired throughout the world for its humanity and impartiality: and if ever instituted in Britain, would be a regressive and affronting imposition.

 

47. Euro Army

 

The future of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), founded upon the predominant military power of the United States, which has for more than half a century secured and maintained Europe’s peace, is now threatened by the European State’s establishing an Army of its own, dubbed the Rapid Reaction Force, upon the pretext that it will facilitate military operations in which NATO does not wish to take part.

48. pretext

 

Since arrangements already exist within NATO for the EU to take military action without NATO’s participation, but using its facilities, assets, transport and intelligence, the reasons for setting up a European Army can only be to confirm the emerging Statehood of the EU, and lessen the commitment of the United States to Europe’s security: so jeopardising NATO’s continuing role, and thereby the peace of Europe.

 

 

49. escape of cat

 

Helmut Kohl’s statement that ‘’ a united Europe without a common defence is, in the long run, not feasible’’ (Independence, CIB, January 2000,p1) would seem to apply regarding the first; and that of Jacques Chirac, ‘’The object of a European defence identity is to contain the United States’’ (cited by Michael Fabricant, MP, House of Commons, 29th March 2000), with respect to the second.

* *

 

DESPOTISM is:

 

[‘ Everything by the EU- but nothing by YOU ’]

 * * *

 (50 - More Reasons in Part 2.)

 Or you may order a booklet from:

 

St Mathew Publishing Ltd

24 Geldart St. Cambridge

CB1 2lX

 

Tel: 01223 504871 or Fax: 01223 512304

2004

CLICK FOR PART 2

 

H.F.1288-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT!

 
[HOW THE PEOPLE WERE DEPRIVED OF THEIR COUNTRY AND CONSTITUTION BY THE MACHINATIONS OF  MANY TRAITORS-NONE OF WHOM HAVE YET BEEN INDICTED FOR TREASON.]

*

TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
 
 By
 
 NORRIS McWHIRTER

HE ARGUED THAT:
 
By its nature, the duty of allegiance is in law "unalienable and perpetual". This language, from Foster`s Crown Cases (1743-1761), was quoted with approval at the trial of Sir Roger Casement in 1917. Casement had been arrested near Tralee, County Kerry, in1916, having been landed from a German U-boat to foment Irish defection. Allegiance was similarly defined at the capital trial of the supercilious Nazi wartime broadcaster, William ' Lord Haw-Haw' Joyce (1906-1946)
 
For the purposes of allegiance, foreign states are deemed either to be "in actual hostility", as in the case of Argentina in 1982,or "in amity", as in the case at present of the other European Union states. However, the condition of hostility or amity in no way disposes of the essential exclusiveness of perpetual and unalienable allegiance. No man can serve two sovereigns. When, therefore the late Sir John Fiennes (1911-1996) cunningly drafted the European Communities Bill, in 1972, and when on 17 October 1972, his unamended Bill became an Act subordinating British law to European law, there was wrought nothing less than the greatest constitutional revolution in Parliament's seven and a half centuries of existence. It was furthermore done without even a schedule of consequential repeals.
 
The politicians of the day, many of them unwittingly, voted to launch the nation on a path of "ever closer[ European] union" which could only lead to the United Kingdom becoming a subordinate offshore province of the United States of Europe. Those who engineered Britain's adherence to the
 
Treaties of Rome and of Maastricht, probably never even had Section 3 of thee Treason Felony Act 1848 drawn to their attention. In it , condemnation is incurred: "If any person whatsoever shall, within the United Kingdom or without, compass, imagine, invent, devise or intend to deprive or dispose our most gracious Lady the Queen. . . from the style, honour, or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom. . ."
 
Indicted and convicted offenders against this unrepealed law are subject to imprisonment "for the term of his or her natural life". Yet not a finger was lifted even when, on 7 February 1992, two Privy Counsellors, Douglas Hurd and Francis Maude, signed the Maastricht Treaty which , at a stroke, brought our Monarch under suzerainty of the European Union.
 
The Queen was thereby rendered subject to past and future judgments of the Court of the European Communities in Luxembourg, from which there is no appeal and which was thereby confirmed in authority over her Courts in which she was previously arraignable.
 
Article 8 of the Treaty of Maastricht which imposed all-embracing compulsory European citizenship on the Queen and all her United Kingdom subjects, without their express consent, did so " subject to the duties imposed thereby". These duties are undefined and are thus both unknown and unknowable. One of them is however perhaps discernable since the Maastricht Treaty left unamended Article 192 of the Treaty of Rome. This reads:
 
"Decisions of the Council or of the Commission which impose a pecuniary obligation on persons other than states shall be enforceable."
 
Since "pecuniary obligations" clearly includes taxation, and "perhaps other than states" must include the new recipients of compulsory European citizenship, we have here the legal authorization of a reserve power to levy new taxation from Brussels on each and every citizen of the 15 EU countries.
 
Of all the magical and mysterious processes involved in Britain's political integration with Europe, initiated by Macmillan and engineered by Heath from 31 July 1961 to17 October 1972, none is more remarkable than the absence of a single measure repealing any part of any of the four great Constitutional Statutes - Magna Carta of Edward 1, the Petition of Right(1627), the Bill of Rights (1688 ) and the Act of Settlement (1700). Perhaps Sir John Fiennes relied upon the doctrine of implied repeal, but certainly the electorate would have regarded express repeal as offending against the principle that nothing but their own demerit can deprive natural born subjects of their peculiar privileges, called their birthright, as enshrined in these hitherto durable constitutional bulwarks.
 
In Vauxhall Estates v. Liverpool Corporation 1932, it was established in law that "no Parliament may bind its successors" However, Article Q of the timeless Maastricht Treaty said that the Treaty "is concluded for an unlimited period" and it conveyed no right or mechanism for secession. It is nonetheless arguable that what one Parliament has done , that same or some succeeding Parliament can undo. In Blackburn v.Attorney General 1983, Lord Justice Megarry, in his judgment declared:
 
"As a matter of law, the Courts of England recognize Parliament as being omnipotent in all save the power to destroy its omnipotence."
 
From the European Court of Luxembourg in 1972, the very year in which Parliament, at least temporarily, voted away its sovereignty in such large measure, came an unappealable judgment on the Treaty of Rome:
 
"The treaty entails a definitive limitation of the sovereign rights of member states against which no provisions of municipal law whatever their nature can be involved."
 
It was in reference to this Court that Sir Patrick Neill QC, former Warden of All Soul`s College, Oxford, coined the maxim; " A court with a mission is a menace; a supreme Court with a mission is a tyranny." The phrase was incorporated into the recent Euro-sceptic speech by the Home Secretary. (1996)
 
Those who see the erosion of British self -government (in defence of the 1,250,000 Britons died in the first half of this century) as emanating from the single Oxford college of Balliol, will be dubbed ' conspiracy theorists'. But the precise legal definition of a conspiracy is that it is an agreement between two or more people, unrelated in marriage, to behave in a manner that will automatically constitute an offence by at least one of them, though mens rea (guilty mind) is required by at least two co-conspirators. There is nothing theoretical about the way in which the Privy Counsellor's oath, which enjoined two Balliol educated Prime Ministers, Macmillan and Heath. And the first British President of the European Commission in Brussels (Lord Jenkins of Hillhead, also a Balliol man!):
 
"To bear faith bear faith and allegiance to the Crown and to defend its jurisdiction and powers against all foreign . . . persons . . . or states."
 
has been breached by these men.
 
What is further demoralizing is that no less than six subsequent Privy Counsellor's, following the precedent of Lord Jenkins in 1975, have each made a solemn declaration before the Luxembourg Court as European Commissioners:
 
"To perform my duties in complete independence in the general interest of the communities; in carrying out my duties".
 
This conflict of solemn undertaking can only mildly be described as duplicitous.
 
Unconstitutionality in the headlong dash to create the new European Super state is hardly confined to Britain. The Dutch draftsmen of the Maastricht Treaty included a stipulation in Article R that each and every country must ratify it "according to its own constitution requirements". Having got it ` wrong' the first time, Denmark's second referendum raised several studiously unanswered constitutional questions . No case was , however, more stark than the case of Germany herself. She has a unique Federal Constitutional Court, the Bundesverfassungsgericht, with nine judges sitting in Karksruhe to guard their Constitution.
The creation of the European Union and Britain's continued self-governance was dependent on the verdict of this Court for , on 11 October 1993 , Germany's instrument of ratification was still undeposited in Rome. Without this twelfth and last document (the other 11 EU countries having ratified the Maastricht Treaty) the EU could not come into being. It transpired however that the terms approved by this supreme German national Court to permit ratification, were miles wide of the terms of the Treaty already signed by the German Government and the eleven other nations.
For instance, the Court declared:
 
"Article F does not empower the (European) Union to procure the financial means or other means it deems necessary to fulfill its purposes."
 
Yet that is precisely what Article F does say in the following words:
 
" The Union shall provide itself with the resources necessary to attain its objectives and carry out its policies."
 
Following a question in the House of Lords, Baroness Chalker, Minister of State in the Foreign Office, confirmed that indeed the European Union "can obtain financial resources to attain the Union's objectives."
 
In another area the Karksruhe Court calmly took for Germany an negotiated opt-out from the European Monetary Union (EMU) - something for which both Denmark and the United Kingdom had to negotiate by special protocol prior to signing. Both the Governors of the Bank of England and the Danish Central Bank have confirmed that there was and is no opt-out provision for Germany in the Treaty. The fact that the terms and conditions of the Maastricht Treaty, as approved by their Constitutional Court, simply do not exist. Hence Germany's rapid ratification was in clear breach of Article R of the Treaty itself. Since its ratification was invalid, the Maastricht Treaty itself has no proper legal standing.
 
Though earlier this year (1996) our Foreign Office made a legal assessment of the Treaty, it has not publicly disclosed the obvious and only conclusion. Perhaps we are waiting either until the going gets rougher or some wealthily corporation litigates to prove that some swingeing Brussels penalty is in fact unenforceable.
 
No sovereign state can survive without the concepts of allegiance and of breaches of allegiance being treasonable.
 
Can a European Super state survive without such internal defences? The answer must assuredly be that where solidarity is more, rather than less, fragile and tenuous, the as yet unfamiliar concept of Euro-treason will eventually be vigorously advanced. There does not appear to be any ready instrument for enforcement at the moment (1996) it is not however hard to predict that the draconian powers of the Luxembourg Court will soon bring the concept of Euro-treason into focus. We are told that the Europol is intended for apprehending cross-border criminals within the Union. But the beef crisis, the United Kingdom was about to acquiesce in its creation. Perhaps a fortuitous blow for freedom has been struck and magazine articles such as this will be safe from a Europol for a little longer.
 

Bully for beef!
 

 
From The Freedom Association www.tfa.net
 
 


 H.F.1378
 
LITTLEJOHN

 

Let's have another referendum - on scrapping the House of Lords:

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN says he reckons a lot more than

 17.4 million would vote

 to kill off the Upper House

By Richard Littlejohn for the Daily Mail :

January  12, 2018

Freedom of speech is under renewed attack, this time from unelected members of the House of Lords. They have hijacked a bill designed to update Britain's data protection laws to launch an outrageous attempt to shackle the Press.

By a slim majority, peers voted this week to compel newspapers who refuse to sign up for state regulation to pay the legal costs of anyone who brings a complaint against them, regardless of merit.

If they succeed, the financial implications could force some smaller, local papers out of business. It would give carte blanche to crooks and fraudsters to bring actions seeking to gag national newspaper investigations into their nefarious activities, secure in the knowledge that even if they lost it wouldn't cost them a penny.

This is precisely the clause which Parliament threw out last year in relation to vexatious libel claims. Now the Lords are trying to smuggle it in under the guise of data protection.

They are also looking to resurrect the second stage of the ludicrous Leveson Inquiry into the Press, which everyone thought was dead and buried.

The last one was little more than a show trial and most of the parallel criminal cases brought against innocent journalists collapsed ignominiously when they came before a jury.
 

The House of Lords has hijacked a bill designed to update Britain's data protection laws to launch an outrageous attempt to shackle the Press

None of that has deterred their Lordships from straining to get the circus back on the road. For once, the chamber was packed to the gunnels. Normally, the Lords resembles the bridge of the Mary Celeste, save for a few old sweats slumbering away on the well-upholstered leather benches.

Like many of their colleagues in the Commons, some peers are still smarting from newspaper exposures of wrongdoing by members of the Upper Chamber — everything from expenses fiddling, to coke-snorting and consorting with whores.

So they have seized their chance for revenge by using the Data Protection Bill to punish the Press — a purpose for which it was never designed.

Matthew Hancock, the new Culture Secretary, has promised to resist the Lords and overturn the amendments when the Bill comes back to the Commons.

But with the Government's wafer-thin, DUP-bolstered majority, there is a danger some Tory Brexit saboteurs — who have had a well-deserved hammering in newspapers including the Mail — may vote with Labour and the Lib Dems, who are both committed to stifling free speech.

I'm always wary of writing about the Press, because it can appear to be special pleading. But this isn't newspaper navel-gazing, it goes to the heart of what passes for our democracy.

Unelected peers, along with the opposition parties, are trying to bring the Press under the control of a new state regulator, bankrolled by ex-Formula 1 boss Max Mosley — who has been seeking his revenge on Fleet Street ever since the now-defunct News of the World exposed him for taking part in military-themed S&M orgies with prostitutes.

The regulator, called Impress, is stuffed with embittered failed journalists, Left-wing lobbyists and professional Press-haters.

This is the rabble that a majority of peers and a significant number of MPs think should have the final say in what you read in your daily newspapers.
 

Unelected peers, along with the opposition parties, are trying to bring the Press under the control of a new state regulator

No self-respecting publication of note has signed up for Impress, preferring to submit voluntarily to an independent regulatory body called IPSO, chaired by a distinguished and scrupulously impartial former Appeal Court judge, who has the power to order front-page corrections and impose fines of up to £1 million.

That clearly isn't good enough for some politicians, who want to control what appears in the Press, largely to spare themselves embarrassment.

Many of them in the Remain camp, especially, blame the Daily Mail and other publications for 'poisoning' the minds of gullible readers and tricking them into voting Leave. Their contempt for the newspaper-buying public knows no bounds.

Freedom of the Press is under unprecedented pressure, not just from politicians, but from self-appointed bigots trying to bully companies into withdrawing advertising from publications of which they disapprove. Virgin Trains' decision to stop selling the Mail is just the latest pathetic piece of politically motivated posturing aimed at appeasing those who want to silence every single opinion they disagree with.

But there's a much bigger picture here.

This isn't just about Press freedom, it's about the way in which we are governed. What the political class still haven't grasped properly about the Brexit vote is that it wasn't just a rejection of the EU, it was a vote of no confidence in the whole rotten shower of them.

It's bad enough when MPs seek to thwart the will of the people. But when unelected peers try to do the same, it's a coup against democracy.

Remoaners in the House of Lords are pledging to stop

Brexit

by any means possible. Where do these pampered, pompous poltroons get the idea that they have a divine right to sabotage

 a clear decision taken by 17.4 million people — the largest number ever to vote for anything in Britain?

Remoaners in the House of Lords are pledging to stop Brexit by any means possible, writes Richard Littlejohn 

We voted to free ourselves from an unelected, unaccountable government in Europe. Why should we now have our future decided by an unelected, unaccountable second chamber at home?

The effrontery of peers such as the absurd Andrew Adonis, a self-important quangocrat who has never been elected to anything in his life, is staggering.

So, too, Cheerful Charlie Falconer, one of the architects of this week's Lords offensive against the Press. He owes his entire political career to the fact that he was once Tony Blair's flatmate.

In 1999, when Blair got rid of the hereditaries, there were 610 members of the Lords. Today, there are 800 of them. The crusty old aristos have been replaced by a pretty unsavoury collection of political placemen, has-beens, never-wases, PR spivs and party donors.

An ermine robe is a reward for failure. The Lib Dems may have only 12 MPs (just eight in England) as a result of being roundly rejected at the ballot box. But they've got more than 100 peers in the Lords — all of whom are pledged to overturn the Brexit vote.

They can claim £300 a day tax free simply for turning up, which is about all most of them can be bothered to do.

There are plenty of well-documented examples of noble lords clocking in, claiming their allowance, and then clocking straight out again.

Two of them served jail time for fraud as a result of the expenses scandal. No wonder the Lords want to punish the newspapers which exposed them.

Brexit, when we finally get round to it, has given us the opportunity to forge a brand-new future, to liberate the way this country is governed, to make politicians properly accountable to the people who pay their wages.

Maybe we should begin with a referendum on abolishing the House of Lords once and for all.

If that were to happen, I'd wager that many more than 17.4 million would vote to kill it off. And not before time. It is an anachronism which no longer serves any useful purpose.

Until now, reform of the Lords has always been hampered by the fact that no one seems to be able to decide what should replace it.

Who cares?

Why replace it with anything, especially as these days the courts seem to have assumed the function of the second chamber?

With any luck, in attempting to defy the will of the people over Brexit and cynically seeking to shackle freedom of speech,

these arrogant Lords might just have signed their own death warrant.
*  *  *
 

I love, I love, I love my little calendar girls 

Call me male, pale and stale, but that picture of Theresa May and her new female whips at No 10 reminded me of the cast of the movie Calendar Girls, starring Celia Imrie, about the Rylstone and District branch of the Women's Institute.

I can't wait for the calendar, girls.

*Call me male, pale and stale, but that picture of Theresa May and her new female whips at No 10 reminded me of the cast of the movie Calendar Girls

 

Actress Celia Imrie (pictured) posing in her famous scene from the 2003 film Calendar Girls

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5260945/Lets-referendum-scrapping-House-Lords.html#ixzz5441IEpiC
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

 

'Let it be impressed upon your minds, let it be instilled into your children that the liberty of the press is the palladium of all civil, political, and religious rights.'-

Junius

*

The press is not only free, it is powerful. That power is ours. It is the proudest that man can enjoy.  It was not granted by monarchs; it was not gained for us by aristocracies; but it sprang from the people

[YOU!]

and with an immortal instinct, it has always worked for the people.-Disraeli.

[DON'T LET THE  UNREPRESENTATIVE   HOUSE OF LORDS GET THEIR WAY.]

ITS YOUR FREE PRESS

DON'T LOSE IT!]

The Labour man Party manifesto of 1935 called for the abolition of the House of Lords but in 1945 no such proposal was evident.

[The answer as many have voiced over the years is for a representative House of Lords selected for their already proven ability in other spheres of life and not those who's only interest is the need of a daily cash machine to encourage them  to

SERVE THEIR COUNTRY.]

[COMMENTS ARE OURS!]

 

JANUARY 12,2018

 

H.F.1436
Judge:

Free Press is our birthright.

By  Rebecca Camber

 DAILY MAIL - Crime correspondent
 

A FORMER Lord Chief Justice described the Press as a 'constitutional necessity' yesterday as he warned about the erosion of court reporting.

Igor Judge, head of the judiciary from 2008 to 2013, said liberty of the Press was a

'birthright of every citizen'

but warned newspapers will not survive on

'charity and goodwill'.

Expressing his 'unequivocal and wholehearted support for the industry, he said action must be taken to

Safeguard the future of the Press.

Lord Judge spoke at a seminar hosted by the Society of Editors into the state of court reporting which has declined nationally by around

40 per cent in recent years

He said:

'In a country governed by the

RULE OF LAW

the independence of the Press is a constitutional necessity.

The peer added; 

"The liberty of the Press is the birthright of the Briton, and is justly esteemed the firmest bulwark of the liberties of this country."

- so said John Wilks in 1762

and the statement still carries an echoing resonance.

'The liberty of the Press is the birthright of every citizen, that is the community as a whole... I am not sure this principle is sufficiently understood. The better it is understood the more every citizen would be dedicated to upholding it.'

Lord Judge spoke out as MPs are due to vote in the next couple of months on tighter media controls which the Prime Minister has warned will undermine a

FREE PRESS .

He said: 'If we do not buy our newspapers, we cannot expect them to survive on

GOOD WILL and CHARITY...

It looks as though something of a crunch is coming.

'The print media is no longer prosperous...that is to the detriment of the community they serve.'

Former culture secretary John Whittingdale suggested social media giants should subsidise court recording as thre already use content from local newspapers.

The Tory Mp said Google and Facebook' are the bigest providers of news yet they don't employ a single reporter-what they do is take content which is produced by journalists working across the media... so my view it is very much in the interests of Google and Facebook to support local journalism.'

*  *  *

'Let it be impressed upon your minds, let it be instilled into your children, that the liberty of the press is the palladium of all the civil., political, and religious rights.'-

Junius. (Unknown political write.)

The press is not only free, it is powerful. That power is ours. It is the proudest that man can enjoy. It was not granted by monarchs; it was not gained for us by aristocracies; but it sprang from the people, and, with an immortal instinct, it has always worked for the people.-

DISRAELI, Benjamin.

An enslaved press is doubly fatal; it not only takes away the true light, for in that case we might stand still, but it sets up a false one that decoys us to our destruction.-

COLTON, Calab

*

[IT is no surprise that so many members of Parliament wish to destroy our FREE PRESS or even CONTROL IT! when one considers how many members have been exposed as LIARS and CHEATS ,and THIEVES of the PUBLIC PURSE-No wonder they want their REVENGE because the FREE PRESS was TOO FREE for their liking.']

*  *  *

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JANUARY 19,2018

H.F.1453
 
 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

JUNE 2-2015

H.F.1388
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 
 

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

 

NEW AGE

OF

 INTOLERANCE

 

A.N. WILSON on the new dark age of intolerance: You must believe in gay marriage, you can't question abortion and as for transgender rights...

By A.n. Wilson For The Daily Mail

 September 30- 2017

The great French writer Voltaire famously said: 'I disapprove of what you say and would defend to the death your right to say it'. In this way, he encapsulated what it meant to be an enlightened human being — someone prepared to consider all points of view.

But in recent years the principle of freedom of speech, sacred since Voltaire's 18th century, has been lost, and this is surely one of the most sinister features of our times. It is as if we are entering a new Dark Age of Intolerance.

The irony is that this intolerance has come about as a result of what were initially good intentions. One of the things which makes me happy as I grow older is the thought that during my lifetime we have all tried to become a kinder society.

When I was a boy and a young man, for example, racist jokes were the norm on radio and TV. Now they would be unthinkable. Mockery of homosexuals, and the equation of being gay with being limp-wristed and camp, were absolute norms of comedy when I was growing up. Now no longer.

Such jokes have gone the way of boarding-houses which used to put 'NO BLACKS. NO DOGS. NO IRISH in the window'. Obviously, all civilised people feel pleased by this.

But somehow those initial good intentions — to be kinder to and more tolerant of others — have morphed into a political correctness that has had the very opposite effect.

Two notorious recent examples of this concerned the treatment of a Christian baker in Northern Ireland, and some Christian bed and breakfast owners in Berkshire. The baker had not wanted to make a wedding cake for a gay couple who were getting married. The B&B owners had refused to let a gay couple share the same room in their establishment. In each case they were successfully sued for unlawful discrimination.

Now, a gay activist would no doubt say this was a good thing, arguing that the baker and bed and breakfast owners' behaviour was comparable to the racism of the past. Yet this is surely getting things wholly out of proportion.

The baker was not persecuting homosexuals, as Hitler did. He was not saying they should be put in prison, as all Home Secretaries in Britain did until the Sixties. He was merely saying that, as a Christian, he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman, and that two chaps tying the knot were doing something rather different, which is contrary to traditional Christian teaching.

Whatever you think about this matter, the Northern Irish baker and the B&B couple were merely holding on to Christian beliefs.

I don't happen to share their views myself, and think that if two people are rash enough to promise to live together for the rest of their lives, good luck to them, whether they are gay, straight, trans or anything else. But surely you can understand both sides of this dilemma, can't you?

Well, the answer, more and more in our intolerant society, is 'No'. My concern here is not about the rights and wrongs of gay marriage, transgender rights, our colonial history, or any of the other emotive issues that are subject to endless debate in the modern age.

It is about freedom of thought and speech; freedom to disagree in a liberal society; freedom to have thoughts which are different from the current orthodoxy.

What began as our very decent desire not to be nasty to those of a different ethnicity, or sexual proclivity, from ourselves, has turned into a world as intolerant as monkish Christianity in the days of the Dark Ages, when any freedom of thought is questioned.

Tim Farron, leader of the Lib Dems during the General Election, was asked repeatedly about his views on gay marriage. As a fairly old-fashioned Christian, he did not believe it was possible — marriage should be between a man and a woman.

As the leader of a modern political party, he knew that it would be political death to admit this. He was finally forced to resign.

This was a signal to the world that if you want to succeed in modern politics, it is simply not allowed to hold views which, until a very short time ago, were the consensus among the great majority of people in the Western world.

I use the words 'not allowed' advisedly. What is sinister about living in the new Dark Ages, however, is that it is by no means clear who is doing the allowing and not allowing. In Mao's China, it was obvious: thought crimes were ideas which contradicted the supreme leader.

In Britain today, however, it seems an army of self-appointed censors — from internet trolls to angry students, lobby groups, town hall officials, craven politicians and lawyers and Establishment figures, as well as a host of other sanctimonious and often bilious busy-bodies — have taken it upon themselves to police what we can and cannot think or say.

Not believing in abortion, like not believing in gay marriage, is now, unquestionably, a thought crime. It was hardly surprising that the Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg recently said he did not believe in abortion, because he is a man of conviction as well as a Roman Catholic, and this is the teaching of his Church. Yet his view was treated with incredulity and disdain by everyone from trolls and women's groups to the higher echelons of the political Establishment.

As in the case of abortion, debate is no longer allowed on transgender issues. There was a BBC2 Horizon Programme last Tuesday night called Being Transgender. The close-up shots of transgender surgery in a Californian hospital will not easily leave the mind.

We met a number of nice people who had decided for one reason or another that they were not the gender which they had once supposed. They were all undergoing some form of transformative medical treatment, either taking hormones or having surgery.

What made the programme strange as a piece of journalism was the fact that it did not contain one dissenting voice. Not one psychiatrist or doctor who said they doubted the wisdom of some of these procedures, especially in the very young.

Still less was there anyone like the redoubtable feminist and academic Dr Germaine Greer who once expressed her view that a man did not become a woman just because he had undergone transgender surgery — and was, as a result, decried from the rooftops with everything from petitions launched to stop her from speaking at university campuses to death threats.

Dr Greer had also been bold enough to say 'a great many women' shared her view, which is obviously true — a great many women do not think that transgender people have really changed sex. What has changed is that it is no longer permitted to say so.

A friend of mine who likes bathing in the women's pond on Hampstead Heath in London says that at least one person now uses the female changing rooms who is obviously in a stage of transition from man to woman, and is simply a hairy man wearing lipstick.

However uncomfortable this makes the women feel, they know that they cannot say anything.

There was an ugly incident lately at Hyde Park's Speakers' Corner, which used to be the place where anyone could go and stand on a soap-box and hold any opinion they liked.

Speakers' Corner was a symbol of British Freedom of Speech. As a schoolboy, I had a Jewish friend whose grandfather used to take us there to listen to people proclaiming that the earth was flat, preachers praising Hitler, Stalin, and others saying whatever they liked. It was the freedom to do so, said the old man who had escaped Hitler's Germany, which made the very air of Britain so refreshing to him.

What would he have thought had he witnessed the scene earlier this month at Speakers' Corner when a 60-year-old woman called Maria was smacked in the face, allegedly by a transgender fanatic, while listening to a talk on planned reforms to the Gender Recognition Act. Reforms which would allow men to 'self-identify' as female, and enter women's changing rooms or refuges unchallenged.

For Maria, as for the intimidated women of Hampstead swimming pool, and for Germaine Greer, it is by no means clear that transgender people have changed their sex.

Transgender activists have labelled women like Maria TERFS — Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists. When news of the assault on her reached the internet — ie instantaneously — the trolls began baying, like the bloodthirsty mob during the guillotine-executions of the French Revolution. 'Burn in a fire, TERF'. 'I want to f*** some TERFS up, they are no better than fascists'.

The use of the word 'fascist' is commonplace in our new Dark Age for anyone with whom you happen to disagree. You hear it all the time in the Brexit arguments which rage all around us and which I dread. As it happens, I voted Remain. But I do not regard Brexiteers as 'fascists', and many of their arguments — wanting to reclaim the power to make our own laws and control our own borders — are evidently sensible.

Yet I have lost count of the number of times I have heard Remainers say that Brexiteers are fascists. As a matter of historical fact, many of the keenest supporters of a united European superstate were actual fascists.

The only British politician who campaigned on the ticket of Europe A Nation during the Fifties was Sir Oswald Mosley who was leader of the British Union of Fascists. But then, today's PC censors don't let facts get in their way of bigotry.

Branding anyone you disagree with a fascist; hitting people in the face; tweeting and blogging abuse behind the cowardly anonymity of the internet — these are the ugly weapons used to stifle any sort of debate. And it is often in the very places where ideas should be exchanged and examined that the bigotry is at its worst: our universities.

This week on the Radio 4's Today programme, we heard James Caspian, a quietly-spoken, kindly psychotherapist, describing what has become a cause celebre at Bath Spa University.

He has been working for some years with people who for one reason or another have begun the process of gender-transition, and then come to regret it.

Caspian is evidently not a judgmental man. He wanted to write a thesis on this subject from a sympathetic and dispassionate point of view.

What makes people feel so uncomfortable with their own apparent gender that they wish to undergo painful and invasive surgery to change it? What makes people then come to reassess their first idea? These are surely legitimate questions about a subject many of us can't quite comprehend.

I have two friends who started out as men, and decided in mid-life that they were really women, or wanted to become women, which is what they have done. I do not really understand what has happened to them, even though they have tried to explain it to me.

Surely a man like James Caspian, who has worked with transgender men and women, should be encouraged by a university to explain this area of medicine or psychology?

But no. The university, having initially approved of his idea for a thesis, then turned down his application. 'The fundamental reason given was that it might cause criticism of the research on social media, and criticism of the research would be criticism of the university,' he told Radio 4 listeners. 'They also added it's better not to offend people.'

This is all of a piece with students at Oxford wanting to pull down the statue of 19th century imperialist Cecil Rhodes from his old college, Oriel, on the grounds that he was racist.

Rather than having a reasoned debate weighing the evils of racist colonialism against Rhodes's benevolence, the student at the forefront of the movement — who had actually accepted a £40,000 Rhodes scholarship funded by the fortune the colonialist gave to Oxford — wanted to pull down the statue.

This is the same attitude of mind as that which led monks in the Dark Ages to destroy the statues of pagan gods and goddesses, or the Taliban to do the same to age-old Buddhist artefacts.

Reason, debate, seeing more than one side to an argument, surely these are the foundations of all that has fashioned the great values of the West since the Enlightenment started in the 18th century with an explosion of new ideas in science, philosophy, literature, and modern rational thought that ushered in the Age of Reason.

Realising that human actions and ideas are often mixtures of good and bad — isn't this what it means to have a grown-up mind? Surely we should be allowed to discuss matters without being accused of thought crime?

In universities, as at Speakers' Corner and in the public at large, there used to be the robust sense that sticks and stones may break our bones but words can never hurt us. Now, the 'hurt-feelings' card is regularly played to stifle any debate.

Little by little, we are allowing the Dark Ages of intolerance to come again. We should not be letting this happen.

We should be able to say: 'We disapprove of your views — on Europe, on Transgender Issues, on Islam, on absolutely anything, but we defend to the death your right to express them'.


 

Full article

 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4935418/A-N-WILSON-new-dark-age-intolerance.html#ixzz4uAFieZ6T
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[COMMENTS-HIGHLIGHTING - ARE OURS!]

 

SEPTEMBER 30-2017

H.F.1329

 

HOME

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM? THAT IS YOUR CHOICE

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-June 27,2008]

DEMOCRACY and freedom. It is a fine sounding phrase-rarely off the lips of President Bush as he blunders around the Middle East.

Why do we readily accept that democracy and freedom are natural partners? There is scant historical evidence for it. Often it is a case of

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM: even DEMOCRACY versus FREEDOM.

Consider two examples.  the United States is the only country to have banned alcohol by public demand. Contrast this with Hong Kong. Until shortly before being handed back by

BRITAIN to BEIJING

 it had

NO DEMOCRACY

at all: It was ruled by a colonial governor. Yet enjoyed enviable freedom with one of the least intrusive governments -and flourished wonderfully.

Our own experience also has much to tell us.

BEING A DEMOCRACY HAS NOT PROMOTED PERSONAL LIBERTY.

QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

More than

3000

 NEW OFFENCES

have been created since 1997, and officialdom revels in nearly

300 POWERS OF ENTRY.

Much of this is due to the

EUROPEAN UNION

whose

DIRECTIVES

are rarely scrutinised, let alone debated , by our supposedly democratic representatives.

WHAT we may SAY, WRITE or DO, or whom WE EMPLOY has been increasingly limited. The Government has passed legislation which can make assisting your son's football team

AN OFFENCE.

Another side of our

'democracy'

demonstrates painfully how the public will is constantly flouted. Take the brazen example of voters being

PROMISED REFERENDUM

on

CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

resulting from the

LISBON TREATY

The unscrupulous machinery of government has been deployed to

FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC WILL.

I am not making a party point.

FOR OVER 40 YEARS, GOVERNMENTS OF BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN RESISTING AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC DEMAND FOR CURBS ON

IMMIGRATION.

especially from the

NEW COMMONWEALTH.

 While successive governments have made a show of meeting public demand, they have, quite consciously

REFUSED TO ADDRESS IT

throwing occasional tit-bits to the voters in the hope

THAT THIS WILL KEEP THEM QUIET.

Consider, also, the strong public demand for

CRIMINALS TO BE PROPERLY PUNISHED.

Successive governments, including Mrs Thatcher's have come under the sway of the

'PRISON REFORM'

people -with the result that

CRIMINALS RECEIVE VERY MODEST SENTENCES.

What is more, if they serve a sentence at all, it is in the softest conditions.

IF LYING ON YOUR BED AND WATCHING TV FOR A FEW MONTHS IS THE WORST THAT THE LAW WILL INFLICT

(and that's if you are even caught)

then

CRIME IS WORTH THE RISK

AND

PUBLIC OUTRAGE IS IGNORED.

The explanation is quite logical. Politicians are typically driven by

TWO THINGS.

THE FIRST is the PURSUIT OF POWER

the most exciting thing in the world, or even some say, the first.  If this urge is not there when they start their political careers

THEN IT SOON TAKES OVER.

THEIR SECOND MOTIVATION -to give our politicians their due - is the DESIRE FOR REFORM, IMPROVE the condition of the PEOPLE.

But the catch here is that most politicians

 THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE FAR BETTER THAN THEMSELVES.

THEY FORM AN ELITE

WHICH LISTENS TO

OTHER ELITES

Or perhaps, since the word elite sounds flattering, we should say

THEY FORM A CASTE.

 

Politicians do not wake each morning wondering whether they are meeting the public will.  They turn to the media to learn what is said about them in newspapers and on the radio by other members of the

NATIONAL ELITE

- the selectorate, the clattering classes, the scribblers, the intellectually fashionable, call them what you will.

 

For elites to be out of touch is not unusual, even inevitable. The desire to be 'in' with the 'right' people is common with politicians; their weakness is for approval (and fame).

Of course, there is one moment when public opinion cannot be ignored -and that is at an

ELECTION

As Rousseau observed, voters are truly free

ONLY

 ON

ELECTION DAY.

But , by then, all the issues are jumbled up, and the voter finds himself choosing between

TWO COMPLEX and CONFUSING MENUS.

And while it is clearly advantageous for a party to offer the public

WHAT IT WANTS, the fact that both main parties say MUCH THE SAME THING..

-and make similar insincere

PROMISES

makes a mockery of any claim to be driven by

PUBLIC WILL.

 

BUT  the ALTERNATIVE to our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM politicians say in horror, would be GOVERNMENT by REFERENDUMS. With 'horror' because it would take power from THEM and give it to THE PEOPLE.

BUT WHY NOT?

The Swiss have made a suburb success of it. Referendums are required on national and local issues if enough voters petition for them and they often do. As a result, the Federal Government, like  the local CANTON administrations, proceeds with CAUTION in case its plans are overturned by a PUBLIC VOTE. . .

To acknowledge that our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, which has developed over the centuries, NO LONGER WORKS -MAY BE PAINFUL. But if you put that to a REFERENDUM,

MOST VOTERS WOULD HEARTILY AGREE.

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

 *

HOME

[brought forward from June-2008

AUGUST-2008

*

[ 'IN JANUARY 2018 we can look back over 10 years and see that the situation with regard to many matters mentioned above has got progressively WORSE! Whether it is IMMIGRATION-POLICING-LAWS...The only GOOD NEWS is that we are only just over a year away from leaving the monstrous soon to be containment camp know as the EU SUPER-STATE a plan of ADOLF-HITLER in 1940 for GERMANY to dominate Europe in the PEACE .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[brought forward from June-2008

 
 
 
 

 

Lets return to our old values, says, Rees-Mogg.

BY Jason Groves-Political Editor-Daily Mail -Monday, January 8,2018

 
 

THERESA May must return to Tory values of individual choice and free trade, Jacob Rees-Mogg has warned.

He fears the Conservatives will lose further ground to Jeremy Corbyn unless the Prime Minister goes back to

'First Principles'.

The prominent Brexiteer is tipped by some as a future Tory leader, although he is not expected to be given a ministerial position in Mrs May's reshuffle.

Mr Rees-Mogg also warned that the poor relationship between Mrs May and Chancellor Philip Hammond is hampering government.

And he encouraged ministers to embrace

BREXIT,

saying that the government had been 'too timid'. Writing in the Sun, Rees Mogg urged the PM to put clear blue water between the Tories and Labour by highlighting the fundamental 'dividing lines' between the two parties.

'Tories want to help people to ,lead lives they want and to remove as many obstacies as possible,' he said.

'The socialist aims to cajole people into leading lives that are "good" for them. Tories are more realistic about human nature and generally more pragmatic.

Some Eurosceptics have privately urged Mrs May to sack her Chancellor into today's reshuffle to prevent him watering down Brexit.

Mr Rees-Mogg said: 'The whole government machine ought to be directed towards the benefit of Brexit and not the timorous efforts of managing decline, a recipe for failure popular with too many post-war British politicians.'

'In this regard, it is essential that the PM and Chancellor improve their working relationship and advocate the same policies. No government works when these two figures are not united.'

Mr Ress-Mogg said Brexit could bring huge benefits, including cheaper prices and real control over Britain's future. But he added: 'Here the Government has been too timid. It is as if it were carrying out a policy reluctantly- one foist upon it by the electorate, not one it really and enthusiastically wants.'

[And the past events or more precisely non-events since the referendum have confirmed this analysis.]

 

 

This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII
 

By Tony Rennell for MailOnline
November 21,2009


 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229643/This-isnt-Britain-fought-say-unknown-warriors-WWII.html#ixzz53txyBNPw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

January 8,2018

H.F.1435
 

GREED THAT SHAMES BRITAIN

ALEX BRUMMER: Boardroom greed shames Britain and insults a generation of young people

By Alex Brummer for the Daily Mail

 January 6, 2018

Efforts to curb pay in Britain’s boardrooms and outsize rewards in the City are still failing. 

In spite of the resignations of the senior independent directors at housebuilder Persimmon there is no public sign so far of chief executive Jeff Fairburn giving up any of his total pay, bonuses and incentive package of £110million.

The scale of his award is an insult to a generation of young people in Britain who now need an £80,000 deposit to get on the housing ladder.

Moreover, the £400million to be shared among the next layer of Persimmon bosses does not sit well in a country grotesquely short of social housing, where private sector builders seek to minimise the amount of land and resources devoted to the less well-off. 

 

Grotesque: There is no public sign so far of Persimmon chief executive Jeff Fairburn giving up any of his total pay, bonuses and incentive package of £110m

Persimmon may appear to represent the worst of the bitter divisions in our society. But who could not feel queasy at the sight of one of the plumpest panjandrums of investment banking, Sir Simon Robey, collecting £37million for advising on a series of deals which weakened the fabric of Britain.

Robey and colleagues at Robey Warshaw should be in the stocks for advising Japanese titan Softbank on the purchase of UK smart chipmaker ARM, and promoting the hugely misjudged, aborted London Stock Exchange deal with Deutsche Boerse.

The collapsed merger saw executives at both exchanges thrown to the wolves, and the LSE destabilised, while the bosses of Robey Warshaw split £63.3million.

It would be nice to think of Robey rolling up his sleeves at a charity like Toynbee Hall or the local homeless shelter rather than lording it up as he once did as chairman of the Royal Opera House.

The public owes a debt of gratitude this week to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development and the High Pay Centre for shining a brilliant light on the gross inequalities that exist within Britain’s FTSE 100 companies. 

Together, they calculate that in the last year the average pay of bosses was 120 times that of a full-time employee on the median wage.

A week earlier, Vlerick Business School in Belgium found that of 861 public companies in Europe the pay gulf between those at the top and employees was greatest in Britain.

What is most startling about this is that executives have been allowed to help themselves by compliant boards at a moment in history when the incomes of ordinary Britons have been squeezed by the financial crisis and the fall in the pound.

The sacrifices have been made by staff while business leaders enjoy the good life, in some cases irrespective of performance.

There are some signs attitudes are changing. The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association has called on boards to ‘be more sceptical about the need for vast executive pay awards’.

It noted that big pay gaps show that too many companies fail to appreciate the value of their workers.

Worse than that, companies in trouble such as Bernard Matthews, Toys R Us and Palmer & Harvey have tried to escape pension obligations built up over a lifetime to loyal workforces. 

The need for boardroom pay to be approved by investors in non-binding votes at annual meetings has helped, with the bosses of the UK’s top companies earning 17 per cent less on average in 2016 than a year earlier.

The added requirement by the Government that annual reports will have to show the pay ratio between chief executives and the average worker should also ramp up the public outrage.

Whether that will make much difference in the most extreme cases such as Sir Martin Sorrell at WPP, who earned £48million in 2017 (down from £70million the year before), is hard to tell.

What is certain is that pension funds and big investors like BlackRock, with £5.7trillion under management, need to keep up the pressure by opposing fat cat deals.

As we have seen time and time again a company’s investors cannot count on supine pay committees, often headed by the weakest link among the directors, to take on the bosses.

Bringing real discipline to pay in the boardroom may require the Government to turn non-binding votes into law, with dissent of 20 per cent of investors requiring action.

If the Tories don’t do it we can be sure that Jeremy Corbyn and his frightening Marxist sidekick, John McDonnell, won’t hesitate to act.

[The unacceptable face of capitalism is still in evidence with the Conservative Party membership reflecting the inability of the party to control the City and its impenetrable defences against CHANGE from fornicator to friend of the PEOPLE.]

The CITY MILE is a financial loose cannon instead of a DUAL- controlled economic force for the benefit of all the PEOPLE and COUNTRY.

 

*

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JANUARY 6,2018

H.F.1434
 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS
 
 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/
Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

 YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

 THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

 SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
(Jeff )RENCE.COM  TRUTHCONTROL.COM/  

WHATDOESIT MEAN.COM

 

 

 HUMANS ARE FREE

CLIMATE CHANGE A HOAX-TRUMP KNOWS IT-NOW YOU KNOW IT!

The Rothschilds.
 
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

 HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 
UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 
 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; AND WASTEFUL CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 SEP 19

OCT-19

NOV-19

 
 
LITTLEJOHN

 

 As Marx said, history does have the ... A Very British Coup revolved around a conspiracy by the military, the media, big business and M15...

 

 

So this is what a very British coup looks like.

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

SOME of you will recall the novel

A Very British Coup,

subsequently made into an award-winning television series on Channel 4.

It was written by Labour MP Chris Mullin, published in 1982, and revolved around a conspiracy by the

MILITARY-THE MEDIA-BIG BUSINESS-M15

to bring down a Left-wing government.

At the time, the plot was entirely credible, since Britain was riven by strikes and revolution was in the air. I read the book as a young labour and industrial correspondent, and it made sense to me.

 The Bennites were in the ascendancy, Margaret Thatcher was horribly unpopular and it looked as if the wizened Hampstead Leftie Michael Foot-Worzel Gummidge, as Private Eye dubbed him-would be our next Prime Minister.

Mullin's assumptions were based  on hard fact. In the Seventies there had been well-founded reports about the Establishment plot to depose Labour's Harold Wilson.

In some quarters, there were even rumblings of a military coup.

A couple of years ago, when the un reconstructed Bennite Jeremy Corbyn became leader, Mullen talked about writing a sequel. He imagined the Funny  People orchestrating a putsch to thwart a democratically elected Corbyn government.

Trouble is, history has a habit of not working out as you expect. Although, as Marx said, history does have the capacity to repeat itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. That's where we are right now. Except tragedy and farce are running in tandem.

WE are in the middle of

A VERY BRITISH COUP

but not as Mullin predicted. What we're seeing is an elaborate, well-financed and coordinated plot to overturn as extreme Left-wing Prime Minister

BUT

the democratically expressed will of the British people.

It's being mounted by the Government of the day, aided and abetted by Big Business and the Civil Service.

[A repeat of 1970's-again by a supposed Conservative Government.]

 

THIS is A  Very BRITISH Coup, only written by Lewis Carroll not Chris Mullin. In our new Looking Glass World, words mean-as Humpty Dumpty declared-whatever they want them to mean.

Thus the dwindling band of MPs sticking uo for the

17.4 MILLION who voted

LEAVE

are condemned as plotters and rebels

Those, including Theresa May, who are doing everything in their power to

PREVENT

BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU

and becoming once again a

PROUD SOVEREIGN NATION

are hailed absurdedly as true patriots

As I've said often enough, just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

About the only thing upon which I've ever agreed with Ken Livingstone - apart from cheap Tube fares - was when he wrote a book called

If Voting Changed Anything They'd Abolish it. The Establishment seems hell-bent on proving him

Right over Brexit .

[The EDP has over decades seen much evidence of this very fact and though continually bringing evidence to the surface nobody appears to be interested whether it is lack of Bobbies -on-the beat - Health Service in crisis-Pot-holes-closed Police Stations...Britons on worst State Pensions in the Europe-even Portugal is marginally more. And a bloated -wasteful and grotesque so-called FOREIGN AID which even some regimes as recipients have requested to be stopped .

I told  you the day after the referendum that the fix was already in . Now they're on the final furlongs

We're being informed, in no uncertain fashion that

OUR VOTES ARE WORTHLESS

that they don't count.

WE'RE TOO IGNORANT, TOO UNEDUCATED, TOO RACIST

To be taken seriously.

Politicians who try to square the circle are vilified.

One minute Dominic Raab, who attempted to make a go of being Brexit Secretary, is a principled pragmatic operator of the highest praise.

The next, when he is forced to resign because Mother Theresa has deliberately undermined his position and then lied about it, he's dismissed as a disloyal traitor. And If I hear anyone else demanding a second

'People's Vote'

I'll scream.

All they want to do is reverse the referendum result or give us three options so they can split the

LEAVE VOTE

To be honest, I can't take much more of this patronising guff. The Beeb's idea of discerning commentators these days seems to extend no further than 'Baroness' Shameless Chuckabutty, Potty Toynbee and Mad Alastair Campbell, the author of the dodgy dossier which took into an

ILLEGAL WAR IN IRAQ.

 

As I believe I may have observed before. Campbell is the only bloke I know with a certificate to prove he's sane.

And don't get me started on the CBI which throughout my career has been wrong about everything from joining the euro to the Thatcher reforms. The CBI speaks only for monopolistic, multinational megacorps, not the small-to-medium businesses which are the backbone of our economy and always get the rough end  of the pineapple from Brussels - even though they don't sell so much as a brass washer outside British borders.

Twenty-five-odd years ago, covering a CBI conference in Glasgow, I watched the chairman of Dunlop taking the stage wearing a kilt and waving a Union Jack, as part of an I'm Backing Britain campaign. The following week he sold the company to the Japanese.

These are the same people bnow claiming to have British interests at the heart of their determination to

KEEP US SHACKLED TO THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC EU

The final straw came when the arrogant Amber Rudd was restored to Government over the weekend and immediately demanded loyalty and unity around Mrs May's 'deal'.  Her commitment to 'loyalty' hasn't stopped her trashing Cabinet colleagues in the past.

This fanatically pro-EU women who oozes an inter-galactic sense of  entitledment from every pore, is the sister of the PR spiv Roland Rudd, who is paid a small fortune to run

PROJECT FEAR

on behalf of his well-healed clients.

Just imagine if one of Boris's siblings was cashing in on

BREXIT.

The calls from Remainers for the police to investigate would be deafening. By Sunday, I'd had enough and reached the point where I came over all Tom Robinson.

I've given up reading the papers,

I've given up watching TV.

 

LOOK, I repeat, for those of you who missed it the first time round, even tungsten-tipped hard Brexiteers like me accept there will have to be some concessions if we're going to escape from the EU straitjacket.

And I do think the prospect of a Marxist Corbynista government is too horrible to contemplate.

But I also believe its 1992 all over again. This is Mother Theresa's

BLACK WEDNESDAY

MOMENT

WHATEVER HAPPENS NEXT

THE TORIES

ARE SHOT TO PIECES.

All trust and confidence in them has drained away and we're looking at a Labour government by default whenever the next election is called

Most of the 17.4 million who believe they have been betrayed will simply stay at home, or drift back to Labour. Democracy will be the ultimate casualty of this shabby debacle.

The pathetic defeatest dog's breakfast of an agreement

 which Mother Theresa is trying to force down our throats isn't worthy of the description 'deal'.

It is a monstrous capitulation and will be etched on her political gravestone, even if she does manage to get it, or a version thereof, through Parliament.

Where do we go from here?

I haven't a clue.

But at least we now know exactly

what a

Very British Coup

LOOKS LIKE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 20,2018

H.F.1747

 *  *  *
[ A MATTER OF FACT!]

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 
 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

*  *  *
 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

  SEP-19

OCT-19

 

 
OCT H 1 2
3 4 5  6

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019      MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

Sorry!  Some of our many links have been contaminated and we will endeavour to correct the problem, as quickly as possible. Starting with the headings and footnote information as of

 November 6,2019

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019