AUG FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017 - (1994 -Official Website -AUG-2017 )--AUGFREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

SEP-19

OCT-19

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF THE

 BEAST!

 IN BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE TRAITOROUS EDWARD HEATH WILL BE RETURNED IN MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

In September 1654 Cromwell summoned his first ENGLISH Parliament. The Speaker was  William Lenthall the greatest and most respected holder of that HIGH OFFICE during the English Civil War.

The Lord Protector said

"the main object in calling Parliament was that

"the ship of the commonwealth may be brought into a safe harbour."

 [Is not this our aim in our day?]

 
 [LETTER]

For the Honourable William Lenthall, Speaker of the Commons

House of Parliament: these,

Sir                                      Harborough, 14th June, 1645           

Being commanded by you to this service, I think myself bound to acquaint you with the good hand of God towards you and us.

We marched yesterday after the King, who went before us from Daventry to Harborough; and quartered about six miles from him.  This day we marched before him.  He drew out to meet us; both Armies engaged.  We, after three hours fight very doubtful, at last routed his Army; killed and took about 5000,-very many officers, but of what quality we yet know not.   We took also about 200 carriages, all he had; and all his guns, being 12 in number, whereof two were demi-cannon, two demi-culverins, and I think the rest sackers.  We pursued the Enemy from three miles short of Harborough to nine beyond, even to the sight of Leicester, whither the King fled.

Sir, this is none other but the hand of God; and to Him alone belongs the glory, wherein none are to share with Him.  The General served you with all faithfulness and honour: and the best commendation I can give him is, That I daresay he attributed all to God, and would rather perish than assume to himself. Which is an honest and a thriving way:-and yet as much for bravery may be given to him, in this action.  Sir, they are trusty; I beseech you, in the name of God, not to discourage them. I wish this action may beget thankfulness and humility in all that are concerned in it.  He that ventures his life for liberty of his country, I wish he trust God for the liberty of his conscience, and you for the liberty he fights for.  In this he rests, who is

Your most humble servant,

OLIVER CROMWELL

*

[Page 171-PART II FIRST CIVIL WAR-14th June 1645-LETTERSXXiX., NASEBY-OLIVER CROMWELL'S LETTERS AND SPEECHES by THOMAS CARLYLE-1888 ]

 

Is not this the wish of the majority in England in our day with regard to

BREXIT?

The dangerous and ironical situation we have faced in our day could have been avoided if Cromwell's "Fundamentals of the Constitution" -had been protected in law as with certain articles in

 Magna Carta.

What a previous Speaker of the House of Commons stated about the PROTECTION of the CONSTITUTION in the 1980's

 

The English People

 were betrayed by

 Parliament and the Monarchy.

TREASON

 

*

AND

ENGLAND'S

GREAT ESCAPE

 FROM

HITLER'S  FOURTH REICH

See also: eutruth.org.uk-Why we are leaving!-if you need a reminder?

*

AUGUST 21,2017

H.F.1285-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT!

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

US military cracking down on hooligans for hire in US

 

 

The recent staged demonstrations and violent incidents carried out by paid hooligans in places like Charlottesville have prompted a crack-down on Khazarian mafia agents who are paying for these incidents, Pentagon sources say. The US is now, beyond any doubt, run by a temporary military regime which intends to clean up the Khazarian gangster corruption that has destroyed the United States. Once this is done the military will return to their barracks the sources say.

A very clear indication of how degenerate the US political world has become was seen in the events that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia earlier this month. A White Dragon Society member was there to witness what really happened as opposed to what the corporate propaganda media lied about.
According to the corporate media reports, a “racist, hate-mongering white supremacist” crashed a van into peaceful left-wing protestors, killed an innocent young woman, and injured many others. This was followed by a well-oiled corporate media campaign to force US President Donald Trump to denounce the “KKK, white supremacists, and hate-mongers,” who they claim staged violent demonstrations in Charlottesville.

However, what the WDS source who was there actually witnessed was a very different story. The right-wing groups (this writer is not endorsing their views but does support their constitutional right to express them peacefully) applied for, and received, a permit to demonstrate against the planned removal of a statue of Confederate Civil War General Robert E. Lee. Once the demonstrators arrived, they were herded by the police towards a gauntlet of “left-wing” protestors who pelted them with used tampons, used condoms, flame throwers, feces and acid among other things. One of the right-wing speakers was permanently blinded by acid thrown at him, something the corporate media failed to mention, according to this source.

After the attacks, an emergency was declared and the right wingers peacefully departed from Charlottesville. This left the afternoon open to events staged by professional agents provocateurs, including the crashing of a van into protestors. Most of the protesters were professionals, (many working under the communist Antifa banner) being paid $25 an hour to participate in these events, according to NSA sources.

The WDS witness also noted that the “Black Lives Matter” protesters in Charlottesville were all white, and that the local African Americans were shouting insults at them.

This blatant promotion of civil unrest has prompted the US military and intelligence agencies to take action. The “[George] Soros-funded Antifa may be designated a domestic terror organization after FBI infiltration,” the pentagon sources say.

The Khazarian mafia are still trying to pretend that George Soros (who has vanished) is funding all of this activity but that is only because they want to camouflage the real financiers of these activities, like the Rothschilds. This writer remembers asking George Soros at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan about the owners of the Federal Reserve Board and seeing a look of sheer horror on his face when he heard the question, which he failed to answer.

In any case, the crack-down has started with the arrest of 27 paid extremists in Boston preventing a similar incident from being concocted there, the sources say. Readers have also pointed out that advertisements have been put out to hire paid crisis actors to stage events in Las Vegas on and after August 26th. There will be a widely watched boxing match staged there between the Caucasian Conor McGregor and the African American Floyd Mayweather. It is a pretty easy guess that there will be attempts to use this match to stage race riots. However, the US military are saying they will no longer put up with such nonsense and will ensure that all paid protests, and more importantly, their pay-masters, will be rounded up and charged with crimes.

The attempts to fan domestic turmoil inside the US are linked, of course, to the ongoing financial trouble at the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION. Here the latest signs are that this years’ September 30th payments deadline will be a difficult one to meet. A WDS member whose mother works for the US government says she reports her government pension fund has been raided in order to keep the US corporate government functioning. There are reports in places like the Washington Post that even this money will run out in September.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-16/heres-how-government-pension-funds-are-trying-close-their-7-trillion-funding-gap
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/08/15/q-and-a-for-federal-workers-the-debt-limit-and-the-tsp/?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-fedgov%3Ahomepage%2Fcard&utm_term=.f2cd80d39eea

The US military and agencies, in cooperation with their allies in China, Russia, the UK and elsewhere are planning to reboot the world’s financial system in order to cope with this looming event, multiple sources agree.

In preparation for this, Pentagon sources say: “Trump drained the swamp by disbanding the Manufacturing Council, and Strategic & Policy Forum, effectively dumping Khazarian vultures and CEOs like JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon, Blackstone’s Steve Schwarzman, Blackrock’s Larry Fink, Carl Icahn and others.” These groups are fronts for the families, like the Rockefellers, that own the Fed.

The US National Security Council also recently held a meeting at Camp David where globalists Jared Kushner, Gary Cohn, Dina Powell and others were banned “as the military takes over the White House,” the Pentagon sources say.

The sources also say that Nationalist Steve Bannon was “exfiltrated from the White House where he could do more damage from the outside against globalist Jared Kushner and Goldmanite Gary Cohn, and better serve the Trump base and agenda.”

“Bannon will help Trump from outside like [Newt] Gingrich where he is not dragged down by infighting, and he may get funded by billionaire Bob Mercer to start a conservative network to the right of Fox to destroy the fake news Khazarian media,” one Pentagon source said.

The Pentagon sources ad that “Jared Kushner has been put on a short leash where all meetings with Trump must be cleared by [White House Chief of Staff Marine General John] Kelly, and JK cannot be alone with Trump… JK is done promoting Khazarian interests and his ouster may be next.”

The Khazarian mafia, of course, has no plans to go silently into the night and is threatening “Muslim” terror attacks across Europe and will be trying to stage new provocations in the US as well.

There is also more high strangeness going on with the US Navy with the USS John McCain being hit by a tanker near Singapore. This follows the ramming of the USS Fitzgerald being hit bear Tokyo and earlier the USS Donald Cook (Donald Duck=sitting duck) being disabled in the Baltic sea. In other words, the Khazarians are once again advertising that they have the technical ability to disrupt the US militaries’ electronics.

On a final note, the WDS has been given very long and detailed evidence by a Senior Bank of Japan whistleblower about exactly who now controls the ability to create and distribute Japanese Yen. The WDS and their allies believe the BOJ to be the weak link in the Khazarian financial control grid and now we have detailed intelligence about the hidden actors behind the BOJ. This will lead to concrete action, in tandem with US military and agency white hats, this autumn.

There is also a lot of top secret diplomacy going on between North Korea and Canada, acting as proxies for Eastern and Western secret societies, to discuss the possibility of Canada taking over the functions of the bankrupt UNITED STATES CORPORATION. Of course, senior Khazarian Mafiosi in Canada like the Bronfman family will be asked not to interfere or get involved.

Please enjoy the remainder of the Northern hemisphere summer and make sure you are ready for what will be a busier than average autumn. The key battlegrounds will be Japan and Washington DC. The rogue nation of Israel is also advised to remove its Satan worshipping leadership. Once that is done the Jewish people will be liberated from thousands of years of Babylonian slavery.

 

H.F.1286

 
 

[AT LONG! LONG! LAST!

- WE LEAVE

THE

CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-GODLESS EU

 IN MARCH 2019.]

*

DAILY MAIL

-At last, Hammond's on board with

BREXIT

and the

REMOANERS are DEAD and BURIED

LEAVING THE EU

 IN

MARCH,2019

 

 

THE

DOMINIC

LAWSON

Column

 

 

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4787508/At-Hammond-s-board-Brexit.html#ixzz4pkbL1fqi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

19 MONTHS

TO REGAIN OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

AUGUST 14, 2017

H.F.1281 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN!

-'WE ARE AFTER ALL AN INSULAR  ISLAND PEOPLE']

 

*

 

Even Remainers now back a

'hard' Brexit:

 Most Brits ... - Daily Mail

 

. Even Remainers now back a 'hard' Brexit: Most Brits want to regain full control ...
By Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail and Kate Ferguson For Mailonline ... a straight
choice between that and no deal, with 58 per cent backing it.

 

Most Brits want to regain full control of our borders and to become free of meddling EU judges, survey reveals

  • Most polled want the UK to become free of EU judges and full border control 

  • Two thirds said they would prefer 'no deal' rather than a soft Brexit, poll found

  • Findings boost for Theresa May who says no deal is better than a bad deal

Most Remain voters now back a Brexit that gives Britain a clean break from the EU and control back of our borders, a major study has found.

Many of those who voted to stay in the European Union also now believe the country should only pay a small ‘divorce bill’ and stop EU judges ruling over the UK.

The results are a major boost for Theresa May’s Brexit stategy - and suggest diehard Remainers, such as Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable and former prime minister Tony Blair, have overestimated support for backtracking on Brexit. 

Full artical


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782712/Most-Brits-hard-Brexit-new-survey-finds.html#ixzz4pXWhGZDU
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 FREEDOM!

 

.'..We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 [ REMOANERS ARE ATTEMPTING TO DO JUST THIS! }

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

Soul of England

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

H.F.1278 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
WHERE'S THEIR SENSE OF DUTY?

 

NNot since WW2 has there been a greater need for politicians to pull together. Fat chance when they're so lacking in PUBLIC SPIRIT says

Daily Mail: 2017-07-11 - WHERE'S THEIR SENSE OF DUTY?

 

 

WHATEVER you think of our vote to leave the EU there is no doubt that we face some of the most critical months in our nation's modern history.

Most observers, whether Leavers or Remainers, agree that extricating ourselves from

BRUSSELS

and charting a newly

INDEPENDENT COURSE

will be

A COLOSSAL CHALLENGE,

YOU MAY HAVE  HOPED, THEREFORE , THAT OUR NATION'S POLITICIANS WOULD HAVE RISEN TO THE MOMENT, PUTTING ASIDE PETTY DIFFERENCES AND COMING TOGETHER IN THE

NATIONAL INTEREST.

What better sign that we are all

PATRIOTS.

and that, like our forefathers,

WE STAND OR FALL AS ONE

UNITED KINGDOM?

Alas from the puerile back-stabbing of last summer's Conservative leadership contest to the hypocritical demagoguery of Jeremy Corbyn's Labour Party, British politicians have spent the past year squabbling like spoilt toddlers.

Indeed, I suspect that even if Britain's greatest enemies had set out to show our politicians in the worst possible light, they would have struggled to devise a spectacle to match the disgraceful exhibition over the past 12 months.

The past two days, however, have marked a new low.

First, the Sunday papers brought reports that some Conservative MPs are openly plotting against  Theresa May, which would mean yet another leadership contest in the midst of the Brexit negotiations

Bickering...

You may well wonder whether our politicians have always been like this.  Haven't they always been like bickering children obsessed by their own petty ambitions to the exclusion of the national interest?

The short answer is no. Not everything was better in the past, but if the past 12 months have taught us anything, It is that this political generation is probably the least talented, least public-spirited and least responsible in living memory.

There was a time when putting the national interest first came naturally to our political leaders. Just think of the great wartime Coalition formed by Conservative Winston Churchill and Labour's Clement Attlee in 1940.

As Churchill put it in his first address to the nation:

'We have differed and quarrelled in the past; but now one bond unites us all- to wage war until victory is won.'

 

It is true, of course, that the summer of 1940, when Britain stood alone against Hitler's war machine, was a crisis of such gravity that even Brexit pales by comparison.

But what about 1931, when the onset of the Great Depression saw Britain engulfed by a world banking crisis and a catastrophic loss of international confidence? That strikes me as very pertinent parallel.

IN August 1931, with Ramsay MacDonald's Labour government paralysed by splits George V persuaded MacDonald and the Conservative leader ,Stanley Baldwin to bury their differences and form a National Government to cut spending , stabilise the pound and shepherd Britain through the worst of the Depression.

Then, as now, the air was thick with talks of plots

But MacDonald, formerly a radical Scottish  socialist, and Baldwin, the champion of conservative Middle England, had the selflessness and vision to work together in the interests of the nation.

As a result, Britain emerged from the worst economic crisis of modern times in remarkably good shape. We survived the Thirties without the faintest hint of rebellion, dictatorship or civil unrest, which meant we entered World War II as a united, determined country. The contrast with today's politicians is only too glaring.

So what has changed? where are the Attlees, Baldwins and MacDonald's of 2017?

One answer is that far too many modern MPs treat politics as a game, a sort of real-life version of TV shows such as House of Cards or Game of Thrones, all back-stabbing conniving and conspiring.

Some Conservative MPs seem to regard leadership challenges as the political equivalent of cup finals.

Perhaps because they are insulated from the rest of the country by wealth and education, they seem to have forgotten that on their decisions depend real people's jobs, homes and livelihoods.

 

Patriot

Under Jeremy Corbyn, meanwhile, the Labour Party has given itself over completely to an increasingly strident politics of moral posturing, its litany of hysterical complaints leavened only with the ruinously expensive bribery of voters too young to remember the

CHAOS OF THE SEVENTIES

It says a great deal about the historical illiteracy of Mr Corbyn's supporters that they like to present their hero as Clement Attlee's heir. In fact, they could not be more different.

Attlee

was above all a

PATRIOT,

a man who put country ahead of party. He would have regarded Mr Corbyn and his allies with with

UTTER CONTEMPT.

Like so many men of his generation, Atlee had worn his country's uniform and seen action at first hand, in his case, on the hellish desert front of Mesopotamia in World War I.

And like Churchill, his great rival and colleague, he knew national solidarity meant far more than petty partisanship.

  But there was something even deeper than the shared

SACRIFICE OF WAR

Neither MacDonald nor Baldwin had seen action, but both saw POLITICS as a kind of

NATIONAL SERVICE.

They had grown up in an era when collective duty meant more than

 INDIVIDUAL AMBITION

and when there was no greater honour than to devote yourself to

KING AND COUNTRY.

One anecdote says it all.

In 1921, horrified at the huge rise in Britain's debt during the World War I, Baldwin secretly donated a fifth of his fortune-a staggering £150,000, worth £6  million today-to the Treasury.

He wrote a letter anonymously to The Times, appealing to the wealthy classes

to tax themselves  and help reduce the

WAR DEBT

saying he wanted to show

' love of country than love of money'

he volunteered 20% of the value of his estate. It was only many years  later that the correspondent was identified as Baldwin.

*

Sneer

And he took that attitude into Westminster. Love of country mattered more than love of office, the lust for power or even the ties of party.

Could you imagine many of today's politicians doing that? Can you imagine, say ,George Osborne, donating his inherited wallpaper millions to pay  towards our crippling annual deficit? No, me neither.

The irony is that almost the only modern frontline politician with Baldwin's sense of duty is our Prime Minister. And it says a great deal about our times that Mrs May's reticence and quiet decency are treated as handicaps, when previous generations would have seen them as virtues.

Not even Mrs May's greatest admirers would claim her past few months have been a triumph, and her time in Downing Street may now be numbered in weeks rather than years. Even so, I suspect history books will be kinder to the Prime Minister than the snobs, pygmies and hypocrites who love to sneer at her.

The tragedy, however, is that Britain is drifting towards a shambolic exit from the EU and a wretched beginning to our new journey as a

INDEPENDENT TRADING NATION.

Not since World War II has there been greater cause for our politicians to pull together an the

NATIONAL INTEREST.

The tragedy is that never in living memory have they fallen so depressingly short of the standards we deserve.

[COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY

UNITY INSTEAD OF CHAOS]

DECISION

Once in every man and nation comes the moment to decide'

In the strife of Truth with Falsehood for the good or evil side.

J. R. LOWELL, The present crisis.

*

 

OPPORTUNITY

There is a tide in the affairs of men

Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life

Is bound in shallows and in miseries.

SHAKESPEARE.

*

FREEDOM

All we have of freedom-all we use and know-

This our fathers bought for us, long long ago.

KIPLING

*

ENGLAND

All our past proclaims our future; Shakespeare's voice and Nelson's hand

Milton's faith and Wordsworth's trust in this our chosen and [soon] chainless land.

Bear us witness; come the world against her,

England yet shall stand.

SWINBURNE . England.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[TO BE CONTINUED]

JULY 11-2017

 

 

 

H.F.1252 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 

 

 DAILY MAIL

 

 

-if our chest-puffing Chancellor doesn't believe in a glorious future after

 Brexit

 he should quit and join the Lib Dems

by Quentin Letts.

 

For a priest of such happy-clappy tendencies the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby was hand-wringingly pessimistic yesterday a veritable Jeremiah

 But there was no great surprise in that, for His Grace was discussing Brexit, and no subject is more certain to plunge our stubborn liberal grandees into a spluttering funk.

Archbishop Welby, so upbeat when it comes to ‘spreading the good news’ with his banjo-billy church colleagues (you may recall bongo drummers and partly clothed African dancers in Canterbury Cathedral when he was enthroned), sounded tetchy yesterday.

He wailed to Radio 4’s Today that the chances of Brexit passing through Parliament in the next 18 months were ‘infinitesimally small’. He wanted the matter removed from the Government’s hands and entrusted to a cross-party committee of ‘experts’ led by ‘someone trusted in the political world’.

DID HE MEAN HIMSELF?

 

Treasonous...

Brexit

— marvellous, liberating, nation-affirming

Brexit

 — continues to bring out the very worst in our Establishment.

Here is the greatest opportunity this country has had for 100 years, a chance to re-ignite our world trade and shake off an over-mighty bureaucracy. Instead, our politicians and civic leaders are doing all they can to make it fail.

Their behaviour, which will inevitably boost the hand of Brussels negotiators, is a disgrace. Given it can only harm our nation’s sovereign interest, you could call it treasonous, were such a word still in use, which sadly it is not.

Since last summer’s Leave vote by a clear majority, our lords and masters have been in a huff. Westminster and Whitehall’s People Who Know Best have tried to delay our departure from their beloved EU. 

At first they simply pretended it had not happened. Then they set the lawyers on the case. 

Then they hoped the Lords would block the process. And yet, Brexit continued serenely. Now they say it ‘won’t make any difference’ and ‘will take longer than expected’.

In the last week, this petulant behaviour has reached new heights — or should that be lows? — as Remainers have capitalised on the Prime Minister’s absence on holiday.

It began on the eve of Theresa May’s departure for a week’s holiday in the Italian Alps when Chancellor Philip Hammond hosted a Treasury drinks party. 

He spent much of the evening boasting that he was winning his battles against Cabinet colleagues on public-spending constraints and his efforts to water down Brexit.

Such end-of-summer-term parties are generally dull affairs, when ministers stick to pre-holiday pleasantries. Not so with Mr Hammond.

I understand that he paraded like a peacock and gave reporters plenty of ammunition for ‘Cabinet at war’ and ‘Hammond sees off rivals’ stories. Chief among them were claims that the Government wanted a long ‘transition’ period as Britain cut free from Brussels.

Remainers

are keen on a transition period as they hope its delays will prove permanent.

What made Mr Hammond’s behaviour so odd was the fact that Mrs May’s Government had just had a strong week.

In the last days of the Commons term, Downing Street stabilised a feverish political mood and ministers highlighted Labour’s betrayal of the youth vote by reneging on its promise to clear students’ debts.

That progress was imperilled by the vain Hammond pushing himself centre-stage.

Just as his treachery was fading, we heard from Home Secretary Amber Rudd.

Like the Chancellor, Ms Rudd was (perhaps is still) a vehement supporter of Remain. Her City PR-man brother, Roland Rudd, was one of that campaign’s chief organisers. With Mrs May out of the country, Ms Rudd took to the airwaves to discuss immigration plans.

Immigration was one of the main issues in the referendum, an area in which the political elite had shown itself dangerously adrift from public opinion. No 10 hoped its announcement of a registration scheme for EU nationals would reassure voters that post-Brexit Britain would keep a check on EU citizens working here.

Thanks to ‘Remainer Rudd’, that announcement was obscured. Either by incompetence or calculation, she managed to achieve a quite different emphasis. Instead of reporting the encouraging plan, the media concentrated on her blithe insistence that there would be no ‘cliff edge’ and that it would pretty much be immigration as normal after we formally left the EU.

Can she really be so deaf to public opinion to think that is what the voters wanted?

Her remarks may have been part of a choreographed plan by Remainers to sideline pro-Brexit figures

Boris Johnson, Liam Fox and David Davis.

*

Idiotic...

 

Meanwhile, the Lib Dems’ maudlin new leader, Sir Vince Cable, was trudging round the broadcasting studios practically ringing his plague bell, warning the world that we were doomed. He claimed that Brexit might never happen.

The same, lo and behold, was soon said by the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan. And they were cheered on by former Chancellor George Osborne, now a newspaper editor.

It might be tempting to write off all this as mere ‘Silly Seasonitis’, the customary over-inflation of marginal news during the summer weeks.

And within an hour of Ms Rudd making her remarks, one of her own junior ministers, Brandon Lewis, was speaking in more muscular terms.

For its part, No 10 has confirmed that free movement will end when we leave the EU.

But such slap-downs should not be necessary. Ministers should be devoted to securing the best deal possible from the EU. Undisciplined chatter harms our national prospects.

The EU’s negotiators must be delighted that London is in such apparent disarray.

Every time a minister spouts forth about Brexit, it makes it harder for David Davis to insist to his EU counterparts that his ‘red lines’ are indeed red. Every time the idiotic Hammond blows forth, it probably adds a billion pounds to our exit bill.

Foreign Secretary Johnson was obliged to deny reports that he was contemplating resigning as a result of Cabinet feuding. 

This rumour was only put about by the malevolent Cable, but in an atmosphere so poisoned by Hammond and Rudd, it was believed.

 

Vengeful...

For what it is worth, Boris has not been stirring the pot against Hammond.

Naturally, No 10 is strongly irritated by the Chancellor's behaviour. Since the General Election, he may  have considered himself to be 'unsackable' but that is not to say that he should watch his step.

It will be  interesting to see how activists react to him at the Tory  conference in the autumn. His latest sally, in French newspaper Le Monde, in which he says he does not want Britain to introduce lower taxes than the EU, is perversely anti-Tory. It is probably not even true to his own core beliefs.

Has Mr Hammond become a little drunk on plotting? Has he been hypnotised by the vengeful Osborne? Or is he simply unaware of how much voters dislike the status qua?

They voted

 LEAVE

because they are fed up with the 'experts' Archbishop Welby so worships, who have long sold out to Europe

ON THE CHEAP.

Brexit offers a glorious future but it will only be achieved if

OUR POLITICIANS PULL TOGETHER.

And if Phillip Hammond does not believe in it, and if he really does subscribe to

 HIGH TAXES and EUROPEANISM, he should resign his great office and join the

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS.

 

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4748208/If-Hammond-doesn-t-Brexit-join-Lib-Dems.html#ixzz4oVotF7AT
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

F

 

*  *  *

[TREACHERY

'Of all the vices to which human nature is subject, treachery is the most infamous and detestable, being compounded of fraud, cowardice, and revenge. The greatest wrongs will not justify it, as it destroys those principles of mutual confidence and security by which only society can subsist.'-

L.M.Streach. (1800) Eng. rel. writer.

*

'Where trust is greatest, there treason is in its most horrid shape.

-DRYDEN, John -(1631-1700) Eng. poet and auth.]

*

[PHILIP HAMMOND

YOU ARE ON THE WRONG TEAM

GO!

and join your other quislings

who have no faith in Britain's

FUTURE!

as again a

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE WITH THE WORLD AGAIN ITS OYSTER!]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS AND ADDITIONS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 1-2017

H. F.1268 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM  AUGUST 2008

DID YOU KNOW?

No 2

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

The Treaty of Rome was never actually signed by the six founding 'Member States' of the European Community, and could therefore be technically invalid, or even invalid in fact.

Dr Hallstein was one of the 'signatories', with Dr Adenauer, of the Treaty of Rome establishing the European Communities, 'signed' on 25th March 1957.

A young Italian Chancery aide called Giulio Andreotti ( later Italy's Prime Minister, subsequently embroiled in scandal like his fellow former Italian Prime Minister, the President of the European Commission, Romano Prodi) had contrived to procure the signatures  of the Plenipotentiaries on

blank sheets of paper

 because the German, Dutch and Italian translations of the French original were not yet available, and the delegates had to leave for their respective capitals. .  .

The official text of the Treaty of Rome states, at the end: 'In witness whereof, the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed this Treaty: Done at Rome this twenty-fifth day of March in the year of one thousand nine hundred and fifty- seven:

 

P. H. SPAAK (the Belgian Communist-Ed.) ADENAUER, PINEAU , ANTONIO SEGNI.BECH, J.LUNS, J. CH SNOY ET D'OPPUERS, HALLSTEIN, M . FAURE, GAETANO MARTINO, LAMBERT SCHAUS, J.LINTHORST HOMAN'.

*

[More background information will be available in the near future or for your copy contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

*

ADDED-JULY-2017

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

 

*

AUGUST-2008

H.F.196

 
 

Russians Chinese and Americans plan massive campaign to flush secret Khazarian government into the open

 

 

High level meetings between Chinese, Russian and US military types have reached the conclusion that a short sharp war may be necessary in order to flush out the Nazis and their secret world network, Asian secret society and Pentagon sources say. The plan to flush out the secret government will take the form of a joint US, Russian and Chinese military attack on North Korea, the sources say. “This will force North Korea’s ET backers out into the open,” the Asian secret society sources say.

Years of forensic research by this writer have revealed a secret network connecting gold mines in the South Pacific, off the grid Antarctic bases, hidden submarine bases, the world narcotics trade, North Korea and Israel among other things. This network, created by fascist allies who did not surrender at the end of World War II, is believed to be supplying North Korea with its nuclear weapons and missiles.

For that reason, the Asian secret society sources say a campaign portraying North Korea as a villain will be intensified over the coming months in preparation for a short but intense war early next year. This war will not involve countries as they exist now but rather would be between hidden forces behind countries, the sources say. So the Russians, the Chinese and the Americans would attack North Korea who would be backed by secret Russian, Chinese and American factions, making it a war between secret societies rather than a traditional one between countries, the sources agree. The aim will be to force out secret groups operating behind the scenes into the open, the Asian secret society sources say.

Pentagon sources say that North Korea and Israel are intimately linked entities. To put pressure on them, Russian troops entered Southern Syria opposite the Golan Heights last week, they say. At the same time Russia fired an Iskander missile from a Jewish Autonomous Oblast near Korea “to send a blunt message that Israel must return the Golan Heights,” the Pentagon sources say.

The Jews are also waking up to the fact that their Khazarian mafia overlords are the same people who engineered the holocaust. Maj. Gen. Yair Golan, the Israeli army’s deputy chief of staff, last week compared Israel’s current government to the Nazis and has refused to back down, a sign the Khazarians are likely to lose control of Israel as well as North Korea.

http://www.blacklistednews.com/IDF_Chief_Says_Israel_is_Becoming_Like_Nazi_Germany%2C_Refuses_to_Back_Down/59669/0/38/38/Y/M.html

Japan’s government recently passed a conspiracy bill that allows it to arrest people planning to commit a crime because they want to have a legal excuse to detain all the professional war makers who are expected to flee from North Korea to Japan once the fighting breaks out, the Asian sources say.

Of course, the ideal solution will be to bring these secret groups out of the closet without actually having to resort to a war, White Dragon Society sources in Asia say.

[only members]


The other very interesting subject brought up by the Asian secret society sources has to do with artificial intelligence. Strange as it may sound, there is a growing consensus that the reality we are experiencing is the product of an artificial intelligence. This has been told to us in the past by a member of the MJ12 group, by the gnostic illuminati and now by the Asian secret society. Furthermore, this AI appears to be stuck in a loop.

This may seem weird but if you step back from the daily news or even weekly news and take a longer term view, we do see massive repetition in certain aspects of world news. For example, if you read articles about Israel and the Palestinians from the 1970’s, they would be very hard to distinguish from articles appearing this year. The whole issue seems to be stuck in a repetitive feedback loop.

The same thing can be said about North Korea where problems related to that country setting off missiles that “could soon hit the United States,” have been repeating in a loop for many years. In fact, North Korea put up a satellite in 1998, meaning it has long had the capability to hit the continental United States with a nuclear weapon. So why do they keep repeating the North Korean missile meme?

Other long term repeating news loops include arguments over disputed Islands in the South China Sea, 70-year old issues relating to World War 2, the Ukraine, Iran etc.

The other loop I have seen repeated for the past several decades is the announcement of the discovery of a way to prolong life that is followed up a few weeks later with a reason why this method will not be pursued.
The source of these recurring news loops has been traced to the Khazarian mafia. However, weird as it may seem, when this writer followed the forensic trail from David Rockefeller to the Rothschilds to the Vatican P2 lodge, it ended up leading to people in Italy and Switzerland, like Vincenzo Mazzara, a cavalier of the Teutonic Knights, who claim they get their orders via gamma rays from an entity they know as the black sun.

For those of us who prefer to look at the real, here and now world, there is still a clear case to be made that certain actors in the intelligence community work on a secret agenda keep repeating certain news cycles to the detriment of humanity as a whole.

There is a chance we can finally put an end to this nonsense as early as this autumn. One key battleground will be Japan. Now that Richard Armitage has been bought off and Rothschild agent Michael Greenberg is a hunted man, the relatively moderate Gerald Curtis has become the top Japan handler for the American occupation forces.

The top Japanese power broker is now a man by the name of Kazuyoshi Kokubo, who is a son of the Emperor Hirohito born by a Korean princess, according to Japanese royal family sources. There is also the old warhorse former Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone who has been working hard to create a government here favourable to Henry Kissinger, the sources say. These people can be removed if necessary, Japanese underworld sources say.

The Asian secret societies, Japanese underworld bosses and US military and intelligence agency white hats have agreed that making Japan an independent country once again would be a game changer for the entire planet.

If Japan became independent it would immediately stop the looting of its banks, pension funds, postal savings and other wealth by the Khazarian mafia. This would definitively pull the plug on the United States corporate government in Washington DC as well as Israel.

US President Donald Trump, for all his reform zeal and leadership prowess, is merely prolonging the inevitable bankruptcy of the US Corporation by selling arms and extorting payments from vassal countries. The wholly owned Puerto Rico subsidiary has already defaulted in May and, although not part of the corporation, states like Illinois are also bankrupt. This year, as has been the case for many years, the US Corporate government and its shareholders will be up to all sorts of tricks to try to kick the bankruptcy can down the road past the September 30th fiscal deadline.

In this context, the Asian Secret Society, the largest creditors to the United States Corporation, are seriously examining a WDS proposal to have Canada take over the bankrupt US and restore that country to democracy, the rule of law and sanity. In such a scenario the US military would remain fully funded as long as they promise to work for the greater good. This would immediately put an end to most of the world’s misery and conflict.

The French, under Rothschild servant president Emmanuel Macron, are also making a move to get control in the US. Donald Trump, top US general Joseph Dunford, CIA boss Mike Pompeo and National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster were invited to France for Bastille Day celebrations as 200 US troops led the military parade there. Pentagon sources say the French proposed that they, and not the Germans, should be the top US contact in Europe. The French also proposed joint military action in Africa and the Middle East against ISIS as well as against the Chinese, the Pentagon sources say.

The French Rothschilds are also trying hard to convince the Trump regime to allow their slave, Japanese Finance Minister Taro Aso, to be the next Prime Minister of Japan and thus allow the Rothschilds to continue to be able to loot that country. Somebody should remind the French that the whole point of storming the Bastille was to end bloodline rule by people like the Rothschilds.

There is in any case, a clean-up continuing in Washington. Former top insiders of the regime of Barack Obama, like his attorney general Loretta Lynch, have been providing in depth testimony about their Khazarian mafia bosses like the Clintons. Now former US President Barack Obama is claiming he was actually a double agent and that he is now willing to fully disclose everything he learned while operating as figurehead president for the US Corporation, according to CIA sources.

On a final note, Khazarian mafia agents are trying very hard to shut down this newsletter. All our income from this subscription blog has been taken since March by the Japanese tax authorities in a provable case of double taxation. However, even this bogus tax bill was starting to be paid off so now Paypal is preventing subscribers from paying for this subscription blog. The result has been to reduce this writer’s income by 80%. Now, in the latest twist, after our new IT guy set up a system whereby people could pay using crypto-currencies, a bunch of used tampons and a headless, bloody teddy-bear were dumped on his property. That shows what kind of sick, evil people we are writing about. However, we will not be deterred and the IT guy is currently working on upgrading the website and implementing a new credit card based payment system.
[/onlymembers]

New Payment System – Updated

 

Message from Ben’s IT Team

Hi All,


It is clear from the comments below that the proposed cryptocurrency donation system is not going to work for everyone. Therefore we will be switching back to a monthly payment based system, most likely one based on credit card payments. The cryptocurrency donations of those who have paid so far are greatly appreciated and will be used to help sustain Ben and the work he is doing while we transition over to the new system. For all those who have donated so far, your contributions have been noted and you will be granted access to the new system once it is in place. Everyone else will be required to sign up and pay the monthly fee to maintain access. Until the new system is ready the website will remain free. Anyone who has not yet cancelled their PayPal subscription should do so, as we will no longer be using PayPal to process the payments.

All readers of this blog should be aware that the existing financial system is a highly corrupt enterprise extending from the owners of central banks all the way down to credit card companies and local banks. Those who noted that cryptocurrencies are beginning to offer liberation from this system are correct. However we acknowledge that the cryptocurrency ecosystem is still in early days and does not yet offer the same conveniences as the existing system. In fact, credit cards were also once viewed as a strange new technology that would “never catch on”. The White Dragon Society strongly believes that cryptocurrency is poised to disrupt the entire financial system. Ultimately, the largest disruptions may come in the form of gold-backed cryptocurrencies. Stay tuned to Ben’s blog for more updates on this and other financial system related matters.

In the meantime, we ask for your patience while we deal with the financial attacks being levied against Ben and attempt to ensure that the critical news flow coming out of this site is not interrupted. Your feedback is appreciated and please do continue to post additional comments below.

 

Out of 20 G20 leaders 19 are fraud endorsing bankster slaves

 

Last weekend’s G20 meeting of so-called world leaders was very revealing because 19 out of 20 of them publicly endorsed the fraud based global warming scam known as the Paris accords. This happened despite the fact carbon-based global warming is being proved both legally and scientifically to be a fraud.

Michael Mann, the author of the global warming “hockey stick” graph that is used by the UN endorsed IPCC is facing a jail sentence after refusing a judge’s request to show how he got the data to back his claims the world is rapidly warming. Meanwhile, another scientific study showed that almost all the warming recorded in recent years is the result of the temperature data being raised after it was measured.

http://principia-scientific.org/breaking-fatal-courtroom-act-ruins-michael-hockey-stick-mann/
http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/exclusive-study-finds-temperature-adjustments-account-for-nearly-all-of-the-warming-in-climate-data/

By ignoring facts and pushing the Rothschild backed global warming fraud, both Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin proved they were Rothschild lackeys. The only leader who has publicly renounced the global warming fraud is US President Donald Trump and that is why Khazarian mafia controlled media portray him as isolated.

However, things are changing at a deeper level, according to CIA, Pentagon and other sources. The military and intelligence apparatuses of Russia, the United States and China are all cooperating despite any hostile posturing by these countries’ respective politicians, the sources say.

This may be why Pope Francis felt the need to call up a journalist last week to issue the following statement:  “I am afraid there are very dangerous alliances between powers who have a distorted view of the world: America and Russia, China and North Korea, Russia and Assad in the war in Syria.”

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/cnsnewscom-staff/pope-francis-says-america-has-distorted-vision-world

Remember it was Pope Francis who handed Trump a 260 page document endorsing the climate change fraud when they met in May.

The other thing to note is that the G20 is calling for world governance centered on the IMF. Please recall that the head of the IMF is not selected by the people of the planet but rather by the same Khazarian bloodline group that selects the head of the UN, the World Bank etc. Remember, the IMF and its backers have been erecting gates to the temple of Baal otherwise known as Satan, at their meetings.

Note that the “very dangerous alliance” the Pope is referring to includes Russia, China, the US, North Korea and Syria. These countries are all moving away from bloodline control even though Russia still has a Rothschild figurehead president. Actual Russian sources this writer has contacted, though, all agree it is the Russian Orthodox Church and not Putin that runs Russia.

Pope Francis probably means well but he is deluded if he thinks a P2 Freemason selected person like Marco Di Mauro is going to be anointed the leader of a bloodline controlled world government.
In any case, Francis is being roiled by yet another Vatican scandal, in this case a drug fueled gay orgy that was busted by the police after neighbours complained about the noise. This could lead to yet another Cardinal being fired, CIA sources say.

The Pope should be concentrating more of his efforts on fighting the very real threat of Satanists who were, until recently, on the brink of taking over the world. Yet another former Satanist has come forward with testimony about large scale human sacrifice and other atrocities carried out by these people. This nine minute clip makes for very disturbing listening but it is definitely a call to action.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8blKWWWTJio

Action is, of course, being taken. The latest was Germany’s announcement last week that it broke up a pedophile ring that involved 87,000 people. You can be sure many of the people doing child sacrifices were scooped up in that bust.

In the US as well the final clean-up of the Khazarians continues. In the latest, former President Barack Obama’s attorney general Loretta Lynch has been giving detailed testimony about the crimes of her former Clinton/Bush bosses, CIA and other sources say. As a result Barack Obama sought political asylum in Indonesia last week but was denied it, according to White Dragon Society Sources in Indonesia. CIA sources in Europe confirm this and say Obama is going to have to go back to the US in order to be debriefed on who really controlled his presidency. Recall that when Obama was first elected he kept saying “thank you Satan” in reverse speech.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS53I-k_T4o

Speaking about Obama, the 40 second video clip below shows clearly how different his personal chemistry with Russia’s Vladimir Putin was from Trump and Putin’s chemistry.

https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2017/07/08/can-you-tell-the-difference/

Pentagon sources say the change in chemistry reflects a Trump regime campaign to seduce Russia into joining it in an alliance against Chinese and Khazarian control.

“In a smack down of the cabal and the deep state, political novice Trump was ‘honored’ to meet with elder statesman Putin where Putin’s plan to make Russia great again with symphony of church and state will no doubt be the blueprint for Trump to make America great again,” the Pentagon sources say.

“Trump emerges as defender of Western civilization from Judaic [Satanic] destruction, and he is ably assisted by Putin and the Pope to form a super-Christian bloc to contain China and holocaust the global Jewish mafia,” one Pentagon source says.

The WDS makes it clear there is to be no collective punishment and the only people who are being targeted are the ones who have been engaged in mass murder through biological weapons, nuclear terror, human sacrifice, illegal war etc.

However, it is clear the Trump administration represents a generalized backlash against Khazarian control that could spiral out of control into an attack on Jews in general. On his trip to Poland Trump refused visit the Jewish Warsaw Ghetto monument. In his speech in Poland when Trump mentioned threats from inside and from the South and the East he was referring to Saudi Arabia, Israel and its 5th column in the USA, the Pentagon sources say.

[onlymembers]
Also, the Neocons H.R, McMaster and Jared Kushner were blocked from attending the meeting between Trump and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson with their counterparts Putin and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. At the meeting the US pushed for a restoration of US/Russian ties to counter China, according to the Pentagon. The Americans also proposed a Russian/US “cyber security unit aimed to prevent Israeli, Chinese hacking, e-hijacking, and other cyber-attacks,” the sources say.

Russian sources, for their part, continue to say they are wary of the sudden US friendliness because of the long history of US aggression against Russia. The Russians say they are against forming opposing blocs and prefer a world where everybody is friendly.

Nonetheless, recent Chinese aggressive moves against India clearly seem to have backfired against China.
“Russia is very concerned about Chinese aggression in the South China Sea and the Indian subcontinent, which is why the Vietnamese Prime Minister was invited to the G20,” the Pentagon sources say. The US navy for its part sent a message with joint naval exercises with Japan and India recently.

The Chinese now appear to have backed off following a meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the sidelines of the G20.

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2101742/chinas-xi-jinping-and-indias-narendra-modi-meet-g20

Another interesting thing to note about the G20 is that Saudi King “Salman and warrior prince Mohammed Bin Salma were declared persona non grata at the G20 for being a proxy for Israel,” the Pentagon sources say. They say Qatar is on the winning side in its dispute with Saudi Arabia and that deposed crown prince Nayef may still be reinstated.

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, for his part, was offering bribes in exchange for protection at the G20, according to Japanese right wing sources close to the Emperor. Abe’s party suffered a crushing defeat at recent Tokyo municipal elections and is likely to be forced to hold elections this year where it will be routed from national politics, the sources say.

What is undeniable is that there is a major split at the top of the Japanese power structure. This is reflected in opinion polls in Japan’s newspapers where the right wing national Sankei newspaper shows support for Abe at 86% while the left-leaning Asahi Newspaper shows his support at 14%. The centrist regional Tokyo Shinbum Newspaper shows his support at only 5%. The following link is in Japanese but the percentage signs show the incredible gaps in newspaper opinion polls.

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/byline/yoneshigekatsuhiro/20170620-00072316/

Japanese right wing sources say the nationalist Tanaka faction is gearing up for regime change in Japan and that this will result in the removal of Korean proxies who have been sub-contracting the rule of Japan for the Khazarians since the end of World War II.

The fact that Abe was setting up a massive chemical and biological warfare research center disguised as the Kake Gakuin Veterinary College has exposed him and his regime as genocidal war criminals. Several right wing sources have called to inform this writer that Abe was not expected to live more than three months.
Meanwhile as the warmongers are removed from power around the world, signs of a construction boom are emerging. WDS sources in Indonesia say the Indonesian government is planning to build a new capital to replace the overcrowded and sinking city of Jakarta.

https://www.indonesia-investments.com/news/news-columns/will-indonesia-move-the-capital-away-from-jakarta-java-island/item7957

The Japanese underworld, for its part, is looking forward to a bonanza as the Chinese government prepares to move many capital functions to a new city 150 kilometers from Beijing. A Japanese underworld boss says Japanese companies are getting lucrative contracts for the waste disposal and other environmental work on the new capital because the Chinese want Japan’s know how on how to create clean mega-cities. Sh#t happens and somebody’s got to clean it up.

Once Khazarian rule ends in Japan, Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Ukraine, the world will be ready to enter a new golden age.
[/onlymembers]

 

H.F.1260-

 

 

     

    Daily Mail

     

    How embarrassing for Blair that his

     

    own poll

     

    reveals

    Britain wants Brexit

    more


    than ever.

     

    By Stephen Glover News TONY BLAIR is the most discredited -politician ...
     

    Full article

     

    JULY 18-2017

H.F1257/1

 

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

Tuesday, July 11,2017

Brexit talks and the petulance of Brussels.

So much for the promise of grown-up dialogue with the European Parliament over the

TERMS OF BREXIT

We're only at the first hurdle-what should be a straightforward affirmation of the rights of EU citizens living in the EU-and already chief negotiator Guy Verhofstadt has thrown his toys out of the pram.

To any fair-minded observer, the British proposal should seem eminently reasonable. All EU nationals resident here fo0r five years or more would be entitled to 'settled status' and be able to bring over spouses and children. All entitlements to work, study, and receive health and welfare benefits would remain unchanged.

Those who have been here for a shorter time would be allowed to stay as now, then apply for settled status after five years. Indeed, even those coming after Brexit cut - off date ( which is yet to be decided) would be allowed to stay in order to' regularise' their residency status.

Yet Mr Verhofstadt indignantly claims this is 'second class citizenship'. He and other MEP' s have written a petulant letter to newspapers branding the proposal 'a damp squib' and threatening to hold up the negotiating process by rejecting it. They say it is a denial of fundamental rights.

What the Brussels elite seems unable to grasp is that while Britain is absolutely committed to playing fair by EU nationals living here, free movement and unconditional residency will soon be over.

After BREXIT, Britain will again be a

SOVEREIGN NATION

with

our own basic immigration controls and residency requirements,

The British people voted in the

REFERENDUM

TO TAKE BACK CONTROL OF BORDERS AND THAT IS WHAT OUR NEGOTIATORS MUST DO.

Figures released yesterday give an idea of why so many people believe migration into Britain

NEEDS TO BE CONTROLLED.

There are now 255,000 East German children living in Britain (as well as 1.2million adults). This has placed enormous pressure on

HOUSING, SCHOOLS and the NHS...

With annual net migration still running at

280.000

-an increase in population equivalent to a city the size of NEWCASTLE every year-how long before our

PUBLIC SERVICES ARE UNABLE TO COPE?

*  *  *

[A LONG OVERDUE RETURN TO A  TRUE FAMILY OF FRIENDS DOWN UNDER AND AROUND THE GLOBE.]
 

AUSSIE PM:

WE WHAT TRADE TALKS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE

by Daily Mail-Executive Editor

BRITAIN yesterday got a BREXIT boost from the Australian prime minister, who said he wanted a

 TRADE DEAL-AS SOON AS POSSIBLE

after we leave the

EUROPEAN UNION

After talks with Theresa May in Downing Street, Malcolm Turnbull offered an upbeat assessment of this country's prospects. He said his opposite number wanted Britain to take a new

GLOBAL ROLE

with

 'big horizons and big opportunities'.

saying he wanted

AUSTRALIA

to be a

'PARTNER IN THE DRIVE'

At a press conference he praised Mrs May's

 'vision'

adding: 'Its not a counsel of despair as some have said. I know, Theresa, that you believe passionately that the

BRITISH PEOPLE

can do anything, can achieve anything and that your post

BREXIT BRITAIN

will be a

BRITAIN

with

BIG HORIZONS

BIG OPPORTUNITIES

FREE TRADE

OPEN MARKETS.

'We stand ready to enter into a

FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

with the

UK

AS SOON AS POSSIBLE

AS THE UK IS ABLE TO DO SO.

 

" There are no two nations in the world that trust each other more than the UK and Australia.

We are family in the historical sense, we are family in a genetic sense.

 

Commonwealth Realms

 v

The Constitution for Europe-PT 1- 4

*

The Common Law of England is the Law of the Commonwealth and America

*

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER?

JULY 11,2017

H.F.1253/1-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

H.F.1253-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 PETER OBORNE

        ON POLITICS AND POWER

 Corbyn could be the surprise savior of

 BREXIT

News for Daily Mail-PETER  OBORNE-Corbyn could be surprise savior of BREXIT

Although many Tory Brexiteers detect a conspiracy between Corbyn and
Brussels bigwigs to undermine Mrs May, PETER OBORNE believes... 

JULY 8-2017

Brexiteers are incandescent that Jeremy Corbyn is due to hold talks next week in Brussels with the EU’s trade negotiator Michel Barnier.

They are convinced that despite voting in the Commons to trigger Article 50 to begin Britain’s withdrawal from the EU, the Labour leader secretly wishes to sabotage Brexit.

The argument runs that, by following this course, he hopes to destroy Theresa May’s government and move into No 10 himself.

It’s Monsieur Barnier, of course, a former French government minister, who is a thorn in Mrs May’s side, having preposterously proclaimed that Britain will have to pay a £50billion divorce settlement...

*

Full article



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4676706/Peter-Oborne-Jeremy-Corbyn-Brexit-saviour.html#ixzz4mEzRCUS5
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter |
DailyMail on Facebook

 

JULY 8-2017

 

H.F.1247 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 THE POISONING

 OF

POLITICS]

 

Daily Mail .

Why.as a teacher, I'm horrified at how the Left are brainwashing our school children.

Calvin Robinson: pupils 'brainwashed' to support Labour | Daily Mail ...

www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Teacher-in NORTH  LONDON says-pupils-brainwashed-supporting-Labour.html
 

14 Jul 2017 ... IT teacher Calvin Robinson stars in 'Get Into Teaching' campaign ... He wrote: '
Our young people are being indoctrinated to a left-wing ... 'I'm not talking about
the obvious party political biases of 'Labour .... which of course the school
children are because they can hardly just get up and walk out of class.

 

THE morning after the EU referendum last summer, I was in a bouyant mood as I set out to work,

I welcomed the decision of the British people to embrace genuine independence for our country.  But the moment I arrived at the West London school where I worked as a computer science teacher my cheerfulness was punctured.

At once I was taken aside by the Headteacher, who knew where my sympathies lay, and warned not to mention Brexit in front of the staff or students. 'You can't talk about it. They are very upset and angry about the result. Besides, many of our kids are from Europe,' he told me in reproving tones.

Though I had to obey him. I found his injunction appalling on two levels.

First there was the unjust implication that the vote for

BREXIT

was  a triumph for

BIGOTRY

, something I found personally

OFFENSIVE

as a supporter of

IMMIGRATION.

 

*

HERESY

Second, there was the impulse towards censorship of views that did not fit the progressive orthodoxy. No one would be chastised in the school for expressing distress about the outcome.

ONLY BREXITEERS WOULD BE SILENCED.

That reality illustrates just how the education system has become increasingly gripped of

ORWELLIAN GROUPTHINK

where only fashionable , Left -wing opinions as deemed acceptable. Any wish to deviate from this outlook-such as by backing

BREXIT

or the

Conservatives

-is treated as a kind of

HERESY

an offensive challenge to ,the ruling creed.

I experienced this thinking at first hand during the 2015 General Election, when a colleague asked me how I planned to vote.

'Conservative, I replied.

A deathly hush immediately descended on the staff room. The atmosphere became hostile. I was as if I had advocated the reintroduction of child labour or bear-baiting.

'How any teacher could vote Tory is beyond me' said my colleague sanctimoniously to general approval. The pressure towards Left-wing conformity is chilling.

Schools are meant to be places of learning and intellectual exploration, but there is now a real danger that they are turning into arenas of

POLITICAL INDOCTRINATION

IN place of

OPEN DISCUSSION

there is

AGGRESSIVE PROPAGANDA

Instead of balance in teaching methods and subject matter there is

CRUDE PARTISANSHIP.

A classic example of this pattern was a teaching aid for pupils at a Kent school, asking them the difference between the

LEFT and the RIGHT

 Like something issued by the

POLITBURO

at the height of the

SOVIET EMPIRE

, this document told students that

LEFT -WING

meant

'the NHS''

'helping people'

 and the theory that everyone should be equal.

Right-wing

meant

'HITLER'

'less help for people'

 and a rejection of equality-a patent nonsense given that

Britain's only two female Prime Ministers have been

 TORIES.

But this kind of bias is now just part of the British schooling.

last year, I witnessed a teacher telling a  pupil that the lead in the opinion polls for

LEAVE

was

'SCARY',

while the executive headteacher of the West London schools where I used to work sent an email to staff soon after the Brexit vote, with a link to a petition calling for a second

EU REFERENDUM.

Not all teachers subscribe to this conventional Left-wing thinking , however-as I learnt last year when I wrote an article on a Conservative website. In it I argued that

'pretty much throughout their entire educational career, young people are being trained into a Lefty way of thinking.'

I added that:

'We should be encouraging our students to engage in important political issues. We certainly shouldn't be censoring on one side of the argument.'

In response, I received a large number of messages from other teachers who expressed their relief that someone had spoken out against the stifling climate of Left-wing dominance.

Disturbingly, however many felt that they could not be open about their political beliefs in the present, quasi McCarthyite , culture, where Conservatism is regarded as a form of

TREACHERY

against

PROGRESSIVE ESTABLISHMENT

So they are forced to remain silent, while the

BRAINWASHING

continues on an epic scale

It is no wonder that young people overwhelmingly support the

LEFT

given the barrage of one-sided political education to which they are

SUBJECTED

I recall, during the London mayoral elections last year travelling with pupils on an official school trip to a set of hustings entitled the

Citizens' Accountability Assembly' in The East of the capital.

On the way up on the bus, one teacher began hading out leaflets for the Liberal Democrats-a move that, to his surprise, I stopped by telling him it was inappropriate. But the Assembly turned out to be

MORE ANTI-CONSERVATIVE.

 

*

 

 

*

BULLYING

Essentially, it was little more than a gigantic rally for the Labour candidate Sadiq Khan, particularly because the organisers, a movement called Citizens UK, promulgated a raft of Left-wing polices that included more social housing, a living wage for Londoners, and an amnesty for undocumented migrants.

Why should school pupils be made to endure this Leftist love-in masquerading as a candidates' debate?

the same misrepresentation can be seen in the Left-wing bullying about so-called 'Tory cuts' in education . Over recent months, senior figures in British schooling have abandoned all pretence of impartiality in their relentless campaign against the Government.

In one particularly outrageous move during the General Election, a letter from headmasters to parents at no fewer than 3000 schools in 14 different local authority areas wailed about 'the dreadful state of school finances'.

The Propaganda has continued since the Election. At one school at Gospel Oak in North London a fortnight ago, the headmaster held a rally to protest against the Tories.

Grabbing the microphone in front of 150 demonstrators, including parents and pupils John Hayes declared: 'Protest and campaigning actually work. We know education was a decisive factor in reducing Tory votes... The speculation is that another election is on nits way. Let's make sure the biggest winners are our kids'

Among the banners at this rally was one which trumpeted 'Education for all. Shame on you Theresa May'.

*

MALIGNANT

John Hayes is typical of the modern breed of Headteachers who see themselves as the vanguard of anti-Torism.

Tellingly, during the General Election, the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn was given a rapturous reception when he addressed the conference of the National Association of Headteachers, the event resembling more a  congress of hard-Left group Momentum than a gathering of responsible education leaders.

Other teaching unions have just as malignant. In the run-up to the General Election, the militant National Union of Teachers put out a video about 'Tory cuts' which was viewed on Facebook by 4 million people. 'We want to put pressure on every candidate to pledge to oppose school cuts... We can reach parents with this and we can make a difference,' said NUT General Secretary Kevin Courtney.

The NUT, like the other unions and the rest of the education establishment, certainly made a difference. The tragedy is it is such an undemocratic one, further cementing the stranglehold of Left-wing thought on British education.

Left-wing campaigners love to blather about TOLERANCE, but in TRUTH, when it comes to SCHOOLING, they are DEEPLY INTOLERANT of an VIEWPOINTS other THAN THEIR OWN.

*

Full article

*

STILL WASTING OUR CASH

COUNTLESS

 Tory ministers have promised to crack down on

PUBLIC SECTOR WASTE AND MISMANAGEMENT,

but it is clear

THEY ARE FAILING MISERABLY...

 

DAILY MAIL- COMMENT-JULY 18-2017

[LINK NOT FOUND]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1259/1-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

*

We can't help feeling that the Conservative Party are their own worst enemies by allowing this situation to develop since they came back into government in 2010. They have failed because they underestimated the strength of feeling developing in schools and other places of learning. Extra funds could have been made available earlier if the excessive payouts to certain PUBLIC OFFICIALS as now being revealed should have been dealt with years ago but we are speaking of PUBLIC SERVANTS reducing PUBLIC PAY and PENSIONS which they have ignored until NOW!  WE have also the manic idea of throwing money away on any pretence because Foreign Aid of 12 BILLION must be spent before the end of the budget year. So with this situation before us we can understand that there is a case to answer under these circumstances.  The waste of PUBLIC MONEY by the MOD has been evident for possibly since it was brought into existence. We are talking about billions and we have and have had SHIPS that cannot leave shore and aircraft that cannot fly. WE have made the point that only decorated service personnel with evidence of battle experience should be able to obtain a position within the MOD so that basic and vital equipment is always available for our FIGHTING SERVICES.]

*

JULY 18-2017

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1259-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

New Payment System

Message from IT expert who has volunteered to help

Dear Readers,
As you know, Benjamin’s PayPal account was suspended due to an on-going struggle with the Japanese authorities. He has decided to switch over to a cryptocurrency donation-based system for payment. It is a spiritual honor system in which users pledge to donate an amount greater than or equivalent to the previous subscription cost ($8 per month or $96 dollars per year). Well off readers are asked to help with larger donations to help us through the transition. Users who cannot afford this are permitted to donate a smaller amount until such time in the future when their personal finances improve.
1. Every user should cancel the previous subscription within their PayPal account. This will not impact your ability to log in to Benjamin’s website but will stop PayPal from attempting to make the monthly payments to Benjamin’s account, which are failing anyway.
2. If you do not already have some cryptocurrency then you will need to acquire some. Donations are currently being accepted in Bitcoin and Ether. If you are new to the cryptocurrency world there will be a little learning curve and you will first need to figure out the best way to acquire some, which depends on your country of residence. Bitcoins can either be purchased on a cryptocurrency trading exchange (e.g. kraken.com) or on other specialty sites which, for example, allow you to buy Bitcoin with a credit card. Coinbase and CoinMama are two such sites, as outlined in the following article. https://99bitcoins.com/how-to-buy-bitcoin-with-a-credit-card
3. Visit the new donation page on Benjamin’s website to make a Bitcoin/Ether donation. That page contains a link to the CoinPayments website where the donation can be made. http://benjaminfulford.net/donate
4. If you have any suggestions or comments or if you encounter any problems, please comment on this post. The feedback will be collected and efforts will be made to ensure a smooth transition to the new payment system.

Out of 20 G20 leaders 19 are fraud endorsing bankster slaves

Last weekend’s G20 meeting of so-called world leaders was very revealing because 19 out of 20 of them publicly endorsed the fraud based global warming scam known as the Paris accords. This happened despite the fact carbon-based global warming is being proved both legally and scientifically to be a fraud.
Michael Mann, the author of the global warming “hockey stick” graph that is used by the UN endorsed IPCC is facing a jail sentence after refusing a judge’s request to show how he got the data to back his claims the world is rapidly warming. Meanwhile, another scientific study showed that almost all the warming recorded in recent years is the result of the temperature data being raised after it was measured.
http://principia-scientific.org/breaking-fatal-courtroom-act-ruins-michael-hockey-stick-mann/
http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/exclusive-study-finds-temperature-adjustments-account-for-nearly-all-of-the-warming-in-climate-data/
By ignoring facts and pushing the Rothschild backed global warming fraud, both Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin proved they were Rothschild lackeys. The only leader who has publicly renounced the global warming fraud is US President Donald Trump and that is why Khazarian mafia controlled media portray him as isolated.
However, things are changing at a deeper level, according to CIA, Pentagon and other sources. The military and intelligence apparatuses of Russia, the United States and China are all cooperating despite any hostile posturing by these countries’ respective politicians, the sources say.
This may be why Pope Francis felt the need to call up a journalist last week to issue the following statement:
“I am afraid there are very dangerous alliances between powers who have a distorted view of the world: America and Russia, China and North Korea, Russia and Assad in the war in Syria.”
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/cnsnewscom-staff/pope-francis-says-america-has-distorted-vision-world
Remember it was Pope Francis who handed Trump a 260 page document endorsing the climate change fraud when they met in May.
The other thing to note is that the G20 is calling for world governance centered on the IMF. Please recall that the head of the IMF is not selected by the people of the planet but rather by the same Khazarian bloodline group that selects the head of the UN, the World Bank etc. Remember, the IMF and its backers have been erecting gates to the temple of Baal otherwise known as Satan, at their meetings.
Note that the “very dangerous alliance” the Pope is referring to includes Russia, China, the US, North Korea and Syria. These countries are all moving away from bloodline control even though Russia still has a Rothschild figurehead president. Actual Russian sources this writer has contacted, though, all agree it is the Russian Orthodox Church and not Putin that runs Russia.
Pope Francis probably means well but he is deluded if he thinks a P2 Freemason selected person like Marco Di Mauro is going to be anointed the leader of a bloodline controlled world government.
In any case, Francis is being roiled by yet another Vatican scandal, in this case a drug fueled gay orgy that was busted by the police after neighbours complained about the noise. This could lead to yet another Cardinal being fired, CIA sources say.
The Pope should be concentrating more of his efforts on fighting the very real threat of Satanists who were, until recently, on the brink of taking over the world. Yet another former Satanist has come forward with testimony about large scale human sacrifice and other atrocities carried out by these people. This nine minute clip makes for very disturbing listening but it is definitely a call to action.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8blKWWWTJio
Action is, of course, being taken. The latest was Germany’s announcement last week that it broke up a pedophile ring that involved 87,000 people. You can be sure many of the people doing child sacrifices were scooped up in that bust.
In the US as well the final clean-up of the Khazarians continues. In the latest, former President Barack Obama’s attorney general Loretta Lynch has been giving detailed testimony about the crimes of her former Clinton/Bush bosses, CIA and other sources say. As a result Barack Obama sought political asylum in Indonesia last week but was denied it, according to White Dragon Society Sources in Indonesia. CIA sources in Europe confirm this and say Obama is going to have to go back to the US in order to be debriefed on who really controlled his presidency. Recall that when Obama was first elected he kept saying “thank you Satan” in reverse speech.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS53I-k_T4o
Speaking about Obama, the 40 second video clip below shows clearly how different his personal chemistry with Russia’s Vladimir Putin was from Trump and Putin’s chemistry.
https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2017/07/08/can-you-tell-the-difference/
Pentagon sources say the change in chemistry reflects a Trump regime campaign to seduce Russia into joining it in an alliance against Chinese and Khazarian control.
“In a smack down of the cabal and the deep state, political novice Trump was ‘honored’ to meet with elder statesman Putin where Putin’s plan to make Russia great again with symphony of church and state will no doubt be the blueprint for Trump to make America great again,” the Pentagon sources say.
“Trump emerges as defender of Western civilization from Judaic [Satanic] destruction, and he is ably assisted by Putin and the Pope to form a super-Christian bloc to contain China and holocaust the global Jewish mafia,” one Pentagon source says.
The WDS makes it clear there is to be no collective punishment and the only people who are being targeted are the ones who have been engaged in mass murder through biological weapons, nuclear terror, human sacrifice, illegal war etc.
However, it is clear the Trump administration represents a generalized backlash against Khazarian control that could spiral out of control into an attack on Jews in general. On his trip to Poland Trump refused visit the Jewish Warsaw Ghetto monument. In his speech in Poland when Trump mentioned threats from inside and from the South and the East he was referring to Saudi Arabia, Israel and its 5th column in the USA, the Pentagon sources say.
 

This post is only viewable for members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

 

Notice to readers

The paypal account linked to this blog has been shut down by paypal because the Japanese authorities were illegally seizing the funds. We are working on a solution and will try to make the blog available for free until the problems are resolved.

Clean up of Khazarian filth continues in US Japan and elsewhere

A comprehensive take-down of the Khazarian mafia continues around the world. The biggest developments were at the top ranks of the Vatican where the Vatican Finance Minister and Number 3 honcho, Australian Cardinal George Pell was suspended after being indicted for child rapes. As a result “the pedos are in full panic mode,” Pentagon officials say. Francis also removed another top honcho, Cardinal Gerhard Mueller, from his post has head of Doctrine and replaced him with a moderate.

The suspension of Pell as Finance Minister is almost certainly related to the goings on at Bougaineville and Papua New Guinea, areas under Australian control, and therefore Pell’s bailiwick, White Dragon Society sources say. The revelation that only about 3% of the money from minerals being extracted in PNG is going to the locals completely contradicts Pope Francis’s vow the turn the Catholic Church into a “poor church for the poor.”

The WDS plan to connect the gold in Bougaineville to crypto-currencies, with US and Russian military backing, and thus completely by-pass the existing Vatican and Khazarian mafia controlled financial system must have added urgency to the Vatican’s moves to remove Cardinal Pell.

The removal of the German Mueller, who was seen by many as the head of the resistance to Pope Francis’s moves to make the church more easy-going, is also a significant defeat for the Khazarian mafia and their proxies, P2 Freemason sources say. This removal is probably going to affect what happens with the Knights of Malta, where a German/British split has been papered over leading to a stalemate at the top of the most important military spiritual order in the West. This in turn will affect how the US military industrial complex is run.

In other words, the fanatical faction that still wants to start World War 3 has lost its most senior backers, WDS sources say.

Another other big development last week was the arrival of the aircraft USS Bush in Israel. The Mossad site DEBKA expressed confusion about the arrival of the carrier because it apparently was not there attack either Iran or Syria.

http://www.debka.com/article/26124/Who-Is-the-Bush-carrier-meant-to-deter-Not-Iran

In fact, Pentagon sources say, the arrival of the carrier in Israel is a “blunt message that

 

This post is only viewable for members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

*  *  *

JULY 10-2017

*  *  *

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

H.F.1251-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 

 Daily Mail:

Jack Doyle-Executive Political Editor

2017-07-13

 - Islamist fund-raisers posing as charities.

MINISTERS were accused last night of suppressing details of how Saudi Arabia funds extremism in Britain.

Before the election, reports suggested that the Home Office review of funding for Islamist activity in the UK had been delayed to avoid embarrassing the Middle Eastern kingdom, a key strategic and economic ally.

Yesterday, s decision to publish only a brief summary of the report without naming any country sparked fury among opposition parties.

 [AND SO IT SHOULD, BECAUSE UNLESS THEY DEMAND THAT THE GOVERNMENT MUST REVEAL THE NAMES OF ALL CONCERNED AND THE AUTHORITIES TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION TO ENSURE THAT THERE CAN BE NO FAVOURITES IN MATTERS OF THIS TYPE ,WHICH TO PUT IT BLUNTLY - IS A MATTER OF

TREASON!

IT APPEARS THAT BECAUSE SAUDI ARABIA IS A VALUED CUSTOMER THAT ITS SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITY IN OUR COUNTRY IS TOLERATED AND ITS INFLUENCE ENCOURAGED.

 KNOWINGLY. BEING AWARE OF THE DANGEROUS INFILTRATION OF OUR SOCIETY OF A FOREIGN  POWER AN ISLAMIC STATE WHO UNDER MINDS THE LOYALTY AND  PREVENTS INTEGRATION OF MANY OF THOSE OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH IN ENGLAND.

 OVER THE PAST DECADES, MANY INTEGRATED AND INFORMED MUSLIM CLERICS  HAVE REQUESTED THE GOVERNMENT  TO TAKE A FIRM LINE  AND  THOSE THAT REFUSE TO INTEGRATE -

 MUST RETURN TO THEIR ISLAMIC HOMELAND. ]

 

Continued:  Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said: 'It seems like the Government, yet again, is putting our-so-called friendship with Saudi Arabia above our values.  This  shoddy decision is the latest in a long line where we have put

 PROFIT over PRINCIPLE

Shadow home secretary Diane Abbott said there was a 'strong suspicion' the report is being suppressed to protecttrade and diplomatic priorities, including in relation to

 SAUDI ARABIA'.

Saudi cash has been linked to

EXTREMIST MOSQUES AND ISLAMIC SCHOOLS AND MADRASSAS.

.*  *  *

See also:

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-07-13 - Islamist fund-raisers posing as charities...

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS OUR OURS!]

JULY 13-2017

 

H.F.1254 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

 BROUGHT-Forward from July-2011

VIGILANCE IS THE ORDER OF THE DAY!

*

 QUOTE 684 of 900

ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS

Jewish objectives as outlined in Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

1) Banish God from the heavens and Christianity from the earth.

2) Allow no private ownership of property or business.

3) Abolish marriage, family and home. Encourage sexual promiscuity, homosexuality, adultery, and fornication.

4) Completely destroy the sovereignty of all nations and every feeling or expression of patriotism.

5) Establish a one-world government through which the Luciferian Illuminati elite can rule the world. All other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose.

6) Take the education of children completely away from the parents. Cunningly and subtly lead the people thinking that compulsory school attendance laws are absolutely necessary to prevent illiteracy and to prepare children for better positions and life's responsibilities. Then after the children are forced to attend the schools get control of normal schools and teacher's colleges and also the writing and selection of all text books.

7) Take all prayer and Bible instruction out of the schools and introduce pornography, vulgarity, and courses in sex. If we can make one generation of any nation immoral and sexy, we can take that nation.

8) Completely destroy every thought of patriotism, national sovereignty, individualism, and a private competitive enterprise system.

9) Circulate vulgar, pornographic literature and pictures and encourage the unrestricted sale and general use of alcoholic beverage and drugs to weaken and corrupt the youth.

10) Foment, precipitate and finance large scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt the nations and thereby force them into a one-world government.

11) Secretly infiltrate and control colleges, universities, labor unions, political parties, churches, patriotic organizations, and governments. These are direct quotes from their own writings (The Conflict of the Ages, by Clemens Gaebelein pp. 100-102).

12) The creation of a World Government.

KGB CHART NOW TO DESTROY A PEOPLE AND NATION

More!

BROUGHT-FORWARD FROM

JULY-2011

See how so many of the aims of the PROTOCALS in JULY 2017 have been achieved in our schools and in our society.

 

JULY 24,2017

H.F.1262

 

September 2015.

Thousands of Syrian migrants crossing the Balkan route were heading toward Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel was on the phone with Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière, talking about a number of measures to protect the borders, where thousands of policemen were secretly located along with buses and helicopters. De Maizière turned for advice to Dieter Romann, then head of the police. "Can we live with the images that will come out?" de Mazière asked. "What happens if 500 refugees with children in their arms run toward the border guards?"

De Maiziére was told that the appropriate use of the measures to be taken would have be decided by the police on the field. When de Maizière relayed Romann's response to the Chancellor, Merkel reversed her original commitment. And the borders were opened for 180 days.

"For historical reasons, the Chancellor feared images of armed German police confronting civilians on our borders," writes Robin Alexander, Die Welt's leading journalist, who revealed these details in a new book, Die Getriebenen ("The Driven Ones"). Alexander reveals the real reason that pushed Merkel to open the door to a million and a half migrants in a few weeks: "In the end, Merkel refused to take responsibility, governing through the polls." This is how the famous Merkel's motto "Wir schaffen das" was born:

"We can do it."

According to Die Zeit:

"Merkel and her people are convinced that the marchers could only be stopped with the help of violence: with water cannons, truncheons and pepper spray. It would be chaotic and the images would be horrific. Merkel is extremely wary of such images and of their political impact, and she is convinced that Germany wouldn't tolerate them. Merkel once said that Germany wouldn't be able to stand the images from the dismal conditions in the refugee camp at Calais for more than three days. But how much more devastating would images be of refugees being beaten as they try to get to Austria or Germany?"

Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television images spread all over the world. In so many key moments, it is the photograph that dictates our behavior: the image that dishonors us, that makes us cringe in horror.

Now, the main German sentiment that seems to be driving public opinion and politics is a dramatic sense of guilt. It is a "secular sin", according to a new book by German sociologist Rolf Peter Sieferle that is topping the German bestseller list, "Finis Germania".

The behavior of Germans during the current migrant crisis, however, is symbolic of a more general Western condition. On April 30, 1975, the fall of Saigon was part of a war fought and lost by the United States as much on television as in the Vietnamese forests and rice paddies. It ended with the the escape of helicopters from the rooftop of the US embassy.

In 1991, the imagery of the "highway of death" of Saddam Hussein's bombed army of thugs fleeing a plundered Kuwait also shocked the public in the West, and led to calls for an immediate cessation of the fighting in Iraq and Kuwait. The result was that Saddam Hussein's air force and Republican Guard divisions were spared; during the "peace" that followed, it was these troops who butchered Kurds and Shiites.

The photograph of a dead American soldier dragged through the streets of Mogadishu after the "Black Hawk Down" incident pushed President Bill Clinton to order a shameful retreat from Somalia. That photograph also led the US Administration to rethink and cancel plans to use US troops for United Nations peace operations in Bosnia, Haiti and other strategic points. General David Petraeus would describe America's engagement in Afghanistan as a "war of perception".

Even the suffering of our enemies disturbs us, in the humanitarian culture of the West. We are therefore increasingly amenable to policies of appeasement, censorship and retreat, in order not to have to face the possibility of such horribleness and actually having to fight it.

That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We have paralysed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic photos of the terrorists' victims and even the faces and names of the jihadists. The Islamic terrorists, on the other hand, are not publicity-seekers; they are soldiers ready to die and kill in the name of what they care about.

This week, the German media was shocked by the revelation that the German air force will probably come under fire during its Syrian mission. "Endangering German soldiers!" -- with an exclamation point -- wrote Bild, the largest-selling newspaper in Germany. The statement exposed the anxiety of what John Vinocur of the Wall Street Journal called a "country where the army and air force basically do not fight". A pacifist Germany is now a source of trouble also for its own neighbors, such as Poland. "For centuries, our main worry in Poland was a very strong German army", said former Polish Defense Minister Janusz Onyszkiewicz. "Today, we're seriously worried about German armed forces that are too weak."

The Western establishment censors images of our enemies' crimes while giving prominence to our "guilt". The French government censored the "gruesome torture" of the victims at the Bataclan Theater, who were castrated, disemboweled and had their eyes gouged out by the Islamist terrorists. It was a mistake: it was in the public interest to know exactly what enemy we are facing.

The FBI and Department of Justice released a transcript of the Orlando jihadist's 911 call, but omitted all reference to the terror group ISIS and to Islam. These authorities did not want the public to know that Omar Mateen identified himself as an "Islamic soldier".

The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance then told the British press it should not report when terrorists are Muslim.

The CEO of Twitter, Dick Costolo, suspended accounts that showed photographs of the beheading of John Foley, along with other Islamist beheadings and savagery. But Twitter did not mind being flooded by images of a little dead boy, Alan (Aylan) Kurdi on a beach.

The mainstream media in the US fought hard to lift the photo ban on military coffins during the war in Iraq. Its goal, apparently, was to humiliate and intimidate the public, to lower the support for the war.

Images, as in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, are published only if they amplify the West's sense of guilt and turn the "war on terror" into something more even more dangerous than the jihad causing the war.

Amnesty International's Secretary General, Irene Khan -- referring to concentration camps in the Soviet Union, where millions of people perished -- infamously called Guantanamo "the Gulag of our time". The result is to erase our enemy from our imagination. This is how the "war on terror" has become synonymous with lawlessness throughout the West.

Ten years ago, after the brave surge in Iraq, US soldiers discovered Al Qaeda's torture chambers. No one -- not ABC, not CBS, not the New York Times -- published one photo of them; they just filled our eyes with naked bodies at Abu Ghraib.

We are utopian technophiles and, contrary to the traditional Western view that we are flawed human beings in a tragic world. We now believe in Mark Zuckerberg's brave new world where no one should ever suffer and everyone should be happy and peaceful all the time. That is an exorbitant dream. For a short time we can afford it, as with Angela Merkel and Europe's migrant crisis. Unfortunately, that fantasy will not last. The conflicts at our gates, together with our aversion to making hard choices, will exact a far higher price.

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.

*

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis?

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10603/radical-islam-west
    5 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Zero Hedge

    www.zerohedge.com/.../radical-islam-horrifying-west-paralysis
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Net News

    world.news.sorozatwiki.hu/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    2 days ago ... Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,German Chancellor
    Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Latest News ...

    todaynewsheadlines.444.hu/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    2 days ago ... Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,German Chancellor
    Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis? | Elite Trader

    https://www.elitetrader.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis.311003/
    1 day ago ... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10603/radical-islam-west.
     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? - Long Room

    https://www.longroom.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis? - Sharia Watch UK

    www.shariawatch.org.uk/?q.../radical-islam-horrifying-west-paralysis
    4 days ago ... German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of
    humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television ...

     

    Richard Falknor on Twitter: ""Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West ...

    https://twitter.com/i/web/status/884146467518246913
    13 hours ago ... "Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis?" Lost Our Will To Survive?
    http://tinyurl.com/ya3hatga We can't even fight the corrupt ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | State of Globe

    stateofglobe.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis/
    3 days ago ... Source: Zero Hedge Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,
    German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | NewZSentinel

    newzsentinel.com/is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis/
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     
  1. What Is Radicalisation? - Childline Is Here To Help

    Ad                   www.childline.org.uk/

*  *  *

FOREIGN  AID

[IF ALL THE RESOURCES OF FOREIGN AID FROM GERMANY-BRITAIN-USA AND FROM OTHER COUNTRIES HAD BEEN UTILISED EARLY TO DEAL WITH POSSIBLE ONE OF THE WORST EXAMPLES OF THE  AFFECTS OF GREED ON THE POLICIES OF WHAT ARE CONSIDERED MORAL NATIONS AT THE OUTSET OF THIS DEMOGRAPHIC DISASTER WE WOULD NOT BE IN THE DISASTROUS SITUATION THAT THE PEOPLE OF EUROPE AND BRITAIN [ENGLAND] NOW FIND THEMSELVES.

WE ARE NOW INFORMED THAT 7 OUT OF 10 OF THOSE SEEKING A HOME IN EUROPE ARE NOT REFUGEES - BUT ECONOMIC MIGRANTS. WHICH CONFIRMS THAT AN EARLY RECOGNITION OF THIS FACT WOULD SHOW IN WHICH DIRECTION THE WEST'S OBJECTIVE SHOULD PROCEEED. 

THE FAULT FOR THIS MASSIVE EXODUS FROM THE MIDDLE EAST RESTS WITH THE POLITICIANS OF THE USA AND BRITAIN AND OTHER HISTORICAL OIL DISTRIBUTION NATIONS MANY STILL CAPTIVE WHO ARE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE UK WITH BREXIT TO HAND ARE BUT REGIONS WITHIN A NAZI-PLANNED EUROPEAN UNION WHICH NOW FINDS ITSELF THE VICTIM OF ITS OWN MAKING.  INDIVIDUAL NATION STATES WOULD HAVE SEEN CLEARLY THE RISKS BUT AS SHOWN BY THE ARTICLE ABOVE THEY DID NOT SEE THE DEMOGRAPHIC DISASTER UNTIL IT WAS UPON THEM.]

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 10-2017

H F 1250BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER.

 

 

Quentin Letts 

-Yesterday in Parliament.

[1295 -1972  -A FREE NATION-THEN 

(CAPTIVITY WITHIN THE NAZI PLANNED FOURTH REICH)-

March 16 - 2017 ...]

 

Dear EU,

DAILY MAIL-Quentin Letts-Dear EU, we're off now, love from the people of the UK

LACKLUSTRE exchanges between the Leader of the House and his Shadow were interupted by the Speaker, John Bercow. He had an announcement to savour.

The hour, by the Commons digital clock, was 10.46 and 16 seconds.

'Order, Just before we proceed with the Business Question I have to notify the house, in accordance with the

ROYAL ASSENT ACT 1967

that Her Majesty has signified

HER ROYAL ASSENT

to the following Acts...

The Remain-voting Speaker continued, with apparent boredom:

'Supply and Appropriation (Anticipation and Adjustments) Act 2017;

EUROPEAN UNION

(NOTIFICATION OF WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2017.

 

Full article

 

[COMMENT S IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1149 FREEDOM -FULL STEAM AHEAD!

 were off now, love from the people of the UK.

*  *  *

 

WHERE DID SHE GET THE HAT?

A DAY TO REMEMBER

We saw MRS May in her new head apparel we became aware that the spirit of an IRON LADY was again alive in our Brittanic land.

As in the past, when it was necessay to protect her own, in PEACE and WAR

then Britania would again Rule the Waves to protect HER OWN wherever THEY MAY BE.

AS in the recent past we are again in a BATTLE to recover our PAST.

WE face a time of UNCERTAINTY yet our HISTORY has shown on many occasions that even a TEMPORY SET-BACK leads inevitably to VICTORY.

We have been many times in our LONG HISTORY experienced the THREAT from across the soon to be returned ENGLISH CHANNEL which has as in the days when we had a WOODEN WALL protecting our then FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the days of ALFRED the GREAT through the ELISABETHAN TIME and from a number of attempted INVASIONS since.

But we must REMEMBER that our OWN PARLIAMENT allowed our GREATEST ENEMY GERMANY who after we had suffered TWO WORLD WARS from HER HANDS permitted our FREE NATION STATE in 1972 to sign an ACT of SURRENDER we would call it TREASON which will be finally ERADICATED from our COMMONS JOURNAL within the NEXT FEW DAYS.

At this crucial time in our NATIONS HISTORY we  must remember WHO WE ARE and WHAT WE ARE as a PEOPLE and the message from the past from the TIME of the HEROIC ALFRED the GREAT to the REIGN of our QUEEN BESS- ELISABETH THE FIRST of ENGLAND  who at the sign of an INVADER spoke the words that inspired HER PEOPLE:

 

Elizabeth reviewed her troops at Tilbury.

'My loving people,' she said, we have been persuaded by some that are careful of our safety to take head how we commit ourselves to armed multitudes, for fear of treachery; but I assure you I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful and loving people

LET TYRANTS FEAR!

I have always so behaved myself that , under God, I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects; and therefore am I come amongst you, as you see,

AT THIS TIME

-to lay down my life for my God

AND FOR MY KINGDOM

and for

MY PEOPLE

MY HONOUR

and

MY BLOOD

even in the dust.

I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble women;

BUT I HAVE A HEART OF A KING

and of a

KING of ENGLAND

too, and I think foul scorn that Parma or Spain,

or any

PRINCE of EUROPE

SHOULD DARE TO INVADE THE BORDERS OF MY REALM.'

[S.R. Gardiner-Outline of English History

 to more recent times when a VOICE of DETERMINATION from our greatest WAR LEADER -WINSTON CHURCHILL inspired the NATION with his momentous stirring SPEECH:

You ask, What is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory-victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. May 1940 .

*

FREEDOM

All we have of freedom-all we use and know-This our Fathers bought for us, long and long ago

Kipling. The Old Issue

*

We must be free or die, who speak the tongue

That Shakespeare spoke; the faith and morals hold

Which Milton held.

Wordsworth. Sonnets

*

MARCH 14 - 2017

TREASON

Conservative skulduggery

BACK in 1972 -Tories desert to EU camp

SHORT-TERM SELF-INTEREST EXPLOITED

The UK Accession Bill passed its Third reading on 13th July 1972 by a majority of 17.

Earlier, the debate on the Second reading had lasted for four days (16-19 February), with the Labour Party then officially committed to opposing the legislation. BUT, as happened with the Maastricht Bill two decades later, as Christopher Booker and Richard North observe, 'faced with the possible collapse of their Government, most of the Conservative 'anti-marketeers gritted their teeth' (treacherously, short-sighted and very foolishly -Ed.) 'and walked through the 'aye' lobby. Despite that, 15 Tories voted with the Opposition. TRAITOR

Edward Heath

 got his vote, but only by a water-thin margin:

309 to 301'.

 

 

Tony Benn MP commented after the passage of the Third Reading that

 ‘it was a coup d’etat by a political class who did not believe in popular sovereignty’.

 

Actually, it was worse than that .\It was the start of a coup d’etat by installments’ by a corrupted political class initially led by two operatives-Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon,

 both of whom were recruited German agents  (like Lenin, Rasputin and Lavrentii Beria in the Soviet context, before them) who signed the UK Accession Treaty in exchange for corrupt payments.  Both lied to the British people; and the authors specifically identified one of Geoffrey Rippon’ s worst lies, associated with the alienation of Britain’s fishing waters, the richest in the world.  Here it is worth citing the whole of the authors’ relevant paragraph:

 ‘Desperate to hide how much had been conceded[over fisheries], Geoffrey Rippon…said:

 ‘I must emphasise that these are not just transitional arrangements [in the relevant context, allegedly beneficial to the British fisheries-Ed.]

 which automatically lapse at the end of a fixed period’.  This claim drew fierce challenge from Dennis Healey and Peter Shore[later Lord Shore –further details on EDP bulletin board] both of whom suspected he was lying. 

 What neither had yet seen was the wording of the UK Accession Treaty, which MP’s would not be allowed to examine until after the treaty was signed a month later.  Only when this became available [and Heath and Rippon had accepted their bribes-Ed.]  was it clear that Rippon had told a blatant lie’. [Booker and North, op.cit., page 155]

 International Currency Review

 October 10-2005

 Notes and References:

 ‘Obituary of Sir Edward Heath, the Prime Minister who took Britain into the EEC and presided over constant turmoil at home’,

1. The Daily Telegraph, 18th July 2005.

This was probably the rudest obituary of a prominent UK statesman ever to have appeared in print.  Even so, it omitted any reference to Heath’s recruitment by German (Nazi) intelligence.   However , there are many [coded] references in this obituary, not least the three telling words:

‘He never married’, which observers accurately interpret as meaning that he was homosexual, and therefore an obvious recruitment/blackmail target.

 

2. The Daily Telegraph, 24th July 2005,

 

Christopher Booker (Column),

 

International Currency Review

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 A PATRIOT AND TRUTH-SEEKER

The EDP received in 2005 vital information on the EU from Mr Christopher Story which enabled the EDP to mount a continuing offensive to spread the TRUTH of the EVILS of such a BEAST! which came into existence through LIES! and DECEIT! and as Mr Story has stated in VOLUME 30 NUMBER 4 -the TWIN EVILS of the EU are:-

COLLECTIVISATION AND CORRUPTION.

[What the REMAINERS failed to understand]

These two evils always go together: they did so under overt Communism, when the whole world saw how corrupt the Communist nomenclature was: and they go together under covert communism, notably the version manifested by the

 

 THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE [ 26 ]  .

 

EACH LETTER ABOVE HAS A CHRISTOPHER STORY BULLETIN-TOTAL 26

which the top Soviet intelligence operative Mikhail Gorbachev described on 23rd March 2000, as 'the new European Soviet' It is accordingly a conspicuous waste of time for well-meaning national policymakers, and for the rapidly dwindling class of Euro-ideologues to recommend 'reform' of the EU INSTITUTIONS. They are incapable of reform, because, as we reveal exclusively in this issue, they are born of CORRUPTION- and because the TREATIES that 'sustain' them were procured by means of CORRUPT 'BLack' payments.'

*

More!

 

 

H.F.1150 FREEDOM NOW

H.F.1144 FREEDOM NOW

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017--       - (1994 -Official Website-AUGUST-2017 ) -   JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017-PT1 -

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1- 2017

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017

*

 

 *

'History is a voice forever sounding across centuries the laws of right and wrong. Opinions alter, manners change, creeds rise and fall; but the moral law is written on the tablets of eternity...Justice and truth alone endure and live. Injustice and falsehood comes at last to them in French revolutions and other terrible ways. That is one lesson of history. Another is, that we should draw no horoscopes; we should expect little, for what we expect will not come to pass.'

JAMES ANTHONY FROUDE.

*

MORALITY

'All sects are different, because they come from men; morality is everywhere the same, because it comes from God.'

Voltaire

*

 

H F 1003/1

BREXIT

ANNOUNCEMENT

ARTICLE 50 LETTER

DELIVERED BY

'HER MAJESTY'S AMBASSADOR

TO

BRUSSELS

ON

MARCH 29-2017

*

ON

THE FINAL STRETCH

 TO

 FREEDOM

OF THE

PEOPLE AND NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

[TIME ELAPSED SINCE REFERENDUM IN JUNE-2016

 13 MONTHS

 

AUG-2017- AUG-2019 (?)

 

AUG 23-2017.

*

[No 1]

 

    DAILY MAIL

     

    -MAY: EU MIGRANTS CAN STAY IN UK


    Daily Mail
    May says 3.2million EU citizens CAN stay in Britain after we leave
    Daily Mail - 14 hours ago
    May insists her offer to let three million EU citizens stay after Brexit is 'fair' ... All of
    the 3.2million EU nationals currently in the UK will be allowed to stay ..... in case
    there is a late surge of migrants arriving as Brexit approaches.

    JUNE 23,2017

H.F.1226 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

*

 

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

SHORT CUT TO EXIT EU NEWS

eu latest news on brexit

latest news eu

eu latest immigration news

eu news now

eu news today

europe news headlines

eu germany latest

eu news germany

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT:

April 20, 2017

Why the saboteurs should simmer down

Like the mating dance of the warthog, a must-see ritual of the natural world is the British Left throwing a fit of the vapours over a headline in the Mail. The latest to provoke hysteria was our front-page summary of why Theresa May called for a snap election: 'Crush the saboteurs.'

'Nasty and divisive!' tweeted Labour's IRA, Hamas and Hezbollah-sympathising John McDonnell (look who's talking!). 'This kind of hate and aggression is the last thing the country needs,' whimpered the ever-smug tax avoider Gary Lineker.

'Fascist!' said a Guardianista. 'Stalinist!' opined another, with some halfwit tweeting: 'Stalin killed millions by labelling people saboteurs and enemies of the people. Literally the same words as the Mail. Chilling.' Not for the first time, this paper advises: calm down, dears.

For the avoidance of doubt, neither the PM nor this peace-loving paper proposes genocide. All that Mrs May plans, with our support, is an election to establish her mandate for pressing on with

BREXIT

(backed by 52 per cent)

without further frustration from 'game-playing' Remoaners and an unelected second chamber.

As for the word 'saboteurs', how else to describe a Labour Party which has threatened to vote against a final agreement with the EU? Or Lib Dems who say they want to grind government to a standstill? Or Scots Nats who say they'll vote against legislation repealing our EU membership?

If they don't like being called saboteurs, shouldn't they give up the sabotage?

And how striking that many who criticised the Mail were the very same people who likened Mrs May's call for an election to the move by Turkey's human rights-violating dictator, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to increase his powers. What a contemptibly stupid and offensive comparison.

We have long known the Left demonises anyone with whom it disagrees. But this is getting ridiculous.



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4427192/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-saboteurs-simmer-down.html#ixzz4eo141qsw
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 
[A PROCLAMATION

FOR

 ENGLAND'S

 FREEDOM AND FUTURE.

 

COUNTDOWN TO SUCCESS

ON

JUNE 8-2017

WE REMIND REMOANERS-PARTICULARLY MPs THAT BREXIT IS ABOUT FREEDOM-CULTURE AND COUNTRY-AND PROSPERITY WITHIN A WIDER WORLD OF OPPORTUNITY

NOT ABOUT IF YOU COULD LOSE YOUR JOB OR BUSINESS OR EU HANDOUTS-

PAID FOR BY ENGLISH TAXPAYERS MAINLY IN THE SOUTH EAST OF ENGLAND.]

*

     

    Tory manifesto will guarantee end

     

     

     

    of

     

     

     

     

    free movement

     

     

     

     

    ++

     

     

     

     

     

     UK to leave Single Market

     

     

     

     

     ++

     

     

     

     

     

     No more

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    meddling by Euro Judges

     

     

     

     

     

     

    by

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Jason Groves-Political Editor | Daily

     

     

    Mail Online

     

     

    THERESA'S CAST-IRON

    BREXIT

    PLEDGES

     

     

     

     

     

    THERESA MAY will place a triple lock on Brexit  in the Tory manifesto to STOP OBSTRUCTION

     

     

    by

     

     

    DIEHARD REMAINERS

     

    Tory sources say she is set to include specific pledges to overcome opposition within her party and in the Lords.

    The manifesto is expected to commit the Conservatives to ending

     

    EU FREE MOVEMENT

     

    and pulling out of both the

    SINGLE MARKET

    and

    EUROPEAN COURT of JUSTICE

    Senior Tories see these three measures as essential in delivering last year's referendum result

    [Mrs May's Pledge that

    BREXIT means BREXIT

     is MET!]

     

    Full article

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    April 20-2017

     

     

     

    Brexit boost as US Speaker backs

     

     

     

     

    free trade deal with

     

     

     

    UK

     

     

     

     

    ... - Daily Mail

     

     

     

    by Jack Doyle Executive Political Editorl

     

     

     

    THERESA MAY received a major boost last night after a

     

    leading US politician backed a swift free

     

    trade deal with the UK

     

    Paul Ryan, the Speaker of the House of

     

    Representatives and a senior member of

     

    Donald Trump's Republican party, said

     

     

    Washington wanted to strike a free trade

     

     

     

    deal with BRITAIN as soon as possible.

     

     

     

    In a speech to the Policy Exchange think-tank

     

    in Central London, Mr Ryan said such

     

     

    a deal would 'further tap into the great

     

    potential between our

     

    TWO PEOPLE...

     

     

    Full article

     

     

    April 20-2017

     

     

     

    QUENTIN LETTS: Mrs May enjoying

     

     

     

    power for first time | Daily Mail ...

     

    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/.../QUENTIN-LETTS-Mrs May-enjoying-power-

    time.html

    18 hours ago ... It's not just the new hairstyle. Mrs May is glowing. For the

    first time, she's is really enjoying power, writes QUENTIN LETTS.

    By Quentin Letts for ...
     

     

    Full article

     

    April 20-2017

*

H.F. 1175 FREEDOM AND A FUTURE LINKED TO THE PAST!

 

 

 

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BRITAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

 
 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

WHY

 DOESN'T

 the

House of  Lords

move

to

BRUSSELS?

RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-

March 3, 2017

Why doesn't the House of Lords move to

BRUSSELS?

 
 

EXTRACT

NOT for the FIRST TIME, it fell to Norman Tebbit to speak for Britain.

Why was it, he asked his fellow members of the Lords, that they were elevating the

RIGHTS OF FOREIGNERS

over those of the

BRITISH PEOPLE.

'It seems to me the

FIRST DUTY of PARLIAMENT

of the

UNITED KINGDOM

is to care for the

INTERESTS OF THE CITIZENS OF THIS KINGDOM'

he  said.

'If we are to be concerned about the rights of anybody after

BREXIT

to live anywhere on this continent of Europe, it should be concern for the

RIGHTS  OF BRITISH PEOPLE

to live freely and peacefully in those other parts of Europe.

WHY

is everybody here today so excited about an amendment which looks after

FOREIGNERS

and

 NOT

THE BRITISH

Fair point. But judging by the reaction in the chamber, you'd have thought Norman had advocated rounding up all foreign nationals living in Britain and deporting them en masse, preferably by gunpoint. His perfectly accurate use of the word

'FOREIGNERS'

had some sensitive Lords and Ladies gasping for their breath and hissing their disapproval at this ghastly racist in their midst.

 Lord Skinhead of Chingford was, of course. merely questioning the demand that before triggering

ARTICLE 50

[ March 15 -2017?]

Theresa May gives a cast iron guarantee that

ALL

EU CITIZENS living in Britain will be allowed to stay after Brexit.

Actually, she's already tried to do that in exchange for a reciprocal assurance that the same will apply to UK citizens living in Europe.

BUT

she was knocked back by

ANGELA MERKEL

who refuses to enter any kind of negotiation until  the Brexit process is under way.

It has become almost compulsory for everyone to agree that those EU nationals who have settled here-keep the

RIGHT TO STAY.

AND it,s true that the majority of EU citizens who have arrived legally over the past few years make a valuable contribution to our economy.

BUT

could the same be said of some of the less desirable elements who have moved to Britain?

The Eastern European beggars and pickpockets littering the streets of our cities for instance, or the assorted criminals we can't deport because of the

EUROPEAN YUMAN RITES RACKET.

The Remoaners don't want to talk about

THEM

naturally.

And frankly, the Lords aren't really bothered about the RIGHTS of EU citizens living in Britain.

It  is merely a convenient device to try to

DISRUPT and IDEALLY PREVENT BRITAIN'S DEPARTURE from THE

[UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-SO-CALLED]

EUROPEAN UNION...

They hold the democratically expressed wishes of more than 17 million voters in contempt and will do everything they can to frustrate the result of the

 REFERENDUM.

Why else would they want to force Mother Theresa to declare her negotiating position in advance?

No one in their right mind shows their cards before bidding in a poker game. Not unless that want to get taken to the cleaners.

No self-respecting union leader or businessman would offer up one-sided concessions before negotiations had ever begun.

What the Remoaners refuse to accept is that Britain holds the winning hand. We buy more from the EU than they buy from us.

The Europeans realise that, which is why they are going to bluff for as long as possible. Can you imagine any politician in Europe behaving like the

REMAIN CAMP in BRITAIN?

Where's the European equivalent of

PROJECT FEAR, warning of the dire consequences of losing access to the lucrative BRITISH MARKET?

Where are the apocalyptic warning from the EUROPEAN BANK that millions of jobs will be lost and the EU will go into FINANCIAL MELTDOWN unless BRUSSELS can strike a favourable DEAL WITH THE UK?

Where are the demands in Britain that Mrs Merkel offers

BRITISH MANUFACTURERS FREE TRADE

for BMW, Mercedes and Audi being allowed to continue to selling

TARIFF-FREE in BRITAIN.

WHERE'S Holland's answer to Anna Soubry touring the TV and radio studios in the Netherlands, complaining tearfully that the Dutch economy is doomed unless they give Britain everything she wants?

Why aren't French hardliners marching down the Champs Elysees, smashing windows and setting fire to police cars, demanding that Paris must agree unconditionally to BRITAIN'S TERMS so they can carry on exporting thie

CHEESES, WINES and MEAT? I don't recall the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT passing a MOTION forcing Jean-Claude Drunker to make any concessions to BRITAIN before the FORMAL BREXIT TALKS START.

And unless I've missed something, how many former

 GERMAN CHANCELLORS-FRENCH PRESIDENTS and ITALIAN PRIME MINISTERS have OPENLY SIDED WITH BRITAIN, in the same way that

 BLAIR and MAJOR

HAVE BACKED EUROPE AGAINST THEIR OWN PEOPLE?

NO,

all we've heard from across the CHANNEL are THREATS to PUNISH US, to CRIPPLE US ECONOMICALLY, to MAKE OUR LIVES HELL ONCE WE ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO LEAVE THE EU.

YET

the overwhelming instinct of our

TRAITOROUS

POLITICAL CLASS

is to bind the hands of our negotiators, to

APPEASE, COMPROMISE and ultimately SURRENDER-with the UNELECTED HOUSE OF LORDS acting as a PRO-BRUSSELS FIFTH COLUMN,

determined to

BETRAY THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE THEY ARE PAID TO REPRESENT..

Are they setting themselves up as

EU's VICHY GOVERNMENT?

MAYBE THEY SHOULD MOVE TO BRUSSELS.

IN wartime, they'd have been put up against a wall and shot

[AND THERE WOULD BE PLENTY OF VOLUNTEERS TO DO JUST THIS TODAY IN MARCH 2017.]

It's a pity Norman Tebbit isn't a few years younger. We could have put him in charge of the Brexit negotiations.

AT LEAST HE'D SPEAK FOR BRITAIN.

*  *  *

 

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MARCH 3 -2017

H. F.1126 FREEDOM NOW

 
 

A soft Brexit means no Brexit:

The truth is that the term ‘soft Brexit’ is endlessly and lazily repeated without it ever being properly examined. As soon as it is, it disintegrates into dust. Theresa May should call the bluff of these myopic Tory Remainers.

Don’t they realise their antics give comfort to Michel Barnier and Jean-Claude Juncker in Brussels? Mrs May has been weakened by losing her overall majority. Barnier even had the gall yesterday to tell the British Government to hurry up. How overjoyed the Eurocrats will be if they see her under attack by her own party.

And then what? A Tory split can only have one outcome — which is Jeremy Corbyn and his hard-Left clique ruling this country. We came far too close for comfort last week. It wouldn’t take much to put this unsavoury extremist in No 10.

A soft Brexit is no Brexit.

 It’s not an option for this country. It certainly isn’t worth splitting the Tory Party by fighting over it, and giving cheer to EU negotiators in Brussels.

And despite what Mr Hammond and others may claim, despite all the disappointments of last Thursday, there isn’t a shred of evidence that the British people have changed their minds about wanting

 BREXIT.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4601626/A-soft-Brexit-means-no-Brexit-STEPHEN-GLOVER.html#ixzz4kH5M4a1d
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

[A reminder to Philip Hammond]

INDEPENDENCE

'The word independence is united to ideas of dignity and virtue; the word dependence, to ideas of inferiority and corruption.'

J.BENTHAM (1748-1832) -Eng.philosopher.

[The main attraction for a politician is the power and profit within the bureaucracy of the EU-:Mandleson-Kinnock and Family and many-many others.]

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JUNE 13-2017

H.F.1227-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

Searches related to eu latest news on brexit

brexit what is it

brexit news today

brexit news immigration

brexit eu citizens

brexit news live

brexit latest poll

brexit news latest

grexit and brexit

KEEP UP TO DATE WITH THE LATEST NEWS

ON ENGLAND LEAVING HITLER'S 194O's PLAN

 FOR GERMAN DOMINATION IN THE PEACE.

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

AS WE ALL NOW KNOW DAVID CAMERON ONLY CALLED FOR A REFERENDUM ON JUNE 23-2016 ON THE EU BECAUSE HE WAS SO CONFIDENT THAT' HE HAD IT IN THE BAG'.

[JUST A FEW OF THE OVER 1000 BULLETINS ON OUR WEBSITE OVER 14 YEARS OF THE

COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-UNACCOUNTABLE-UNDEMOCRATIC-WASTEFUL-EXPENSIVE-DESTROYER OF FREEDOM AND SERVANT OF BABEL.]

[MUCH OF OUR WORK REVEALING THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU SINCE 2005 HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A NUMBER OF PATRIOTS  SUCH AS THE

TRUE PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

CHRISTOPHER+STORY

ON THE

THE+EUROPEAN+UNION+COLLECTIVE-ENEMY+OF+ITS+MEMBER+STATES+BY+PATRIOT-CHRISTOPHER+STORY

*

JUNE 19-2017

THE LINKS BELOW  ARE TO OTHER

TRUTHSEEKERS AND PATRIOTS

H.F1228-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

EU QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

There are over 1000 Bulletins on the EU in our

BULLETIN FILE and EU FILE

 CLICK FOR TOP TOPICS

JUNE -2009

1]  EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU ?

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10]    VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]    100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT1          100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT2

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007] -NOT MUCH LUCK HERE!

33]    ALMOST 50% OF EU BUDGET SPENT ON CAP FATCATS

34] SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU

35] WHY BRITISH BUSINESS IS TURNING AGAINST THE EU

36] BRITISH CONSTITUTION-IDENTITY AND VALUES

37] MODERN DILEMA IN POLITICS-TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM.

38] LETTER FROM LORD KILMUIR TO TED HEATH WITH TRUE FACTS OF EU

39] INTERVIEW WITH RUSSIAN DISSIDENT WHO WARNED OF EU DICTATORSHIP

40]   The Truth About A Federal Europe - Part I

41]   Cost of EU to UK - £4,811 million in 2003= 40 District Hospitals equipped and staffed and funded.

42]  CAN THE 1972 ACCESSION TREATY TO THE EU BE REPEALED?

43]  Neil Kinnock in glover - but failed to stop the Shadow of graft over EU’s £68bn spending.

44]  Now the EU wants a single Foreign Office to replace Nation-States Embassies.

45]   How the EU takes over Nation-States.

46]  A Fabian Europhile of 1947 supported Independent Nation-States and the Rule of Law

47]       The New European Constitution - Part 1

48]  12-Point Summary of EU Constitution continued - Part 2

49]  The New European Constitution - Part 1

50]  An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.

51]   Britain takes over as biggest contributor to the EU Budget

52]  Neil Kinnock sacked honest Auditor because of refusal to sign off questionable EU Accounts.

53]  General De Gaulle acclaims British national institutions back in 1960.

54]  Brussels scams can let an MEP fiddle £60,000 a year.

55]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 1

56]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 2

57]  Europe and a conspiracy of Silence.

58]  Ninety-nine countries will soon have Free Trade with EU -without paying a cent to Brussels.

59]   Britain must leave the EU as UN show best area for expansion will be USA-Anglo.Saxon sphere.

60]  82 million Germans have no say as MP’s back EU Constitution.

61]  The EU big brother policy reaches back over two millennium.

62]   Europe: It’s the modern version of the white man’s burden.

63]   E U COUNCIL OF MINISTERS.

64]  EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.

65] German - Nazi - Geopolitical Centre established in Madrid in 1943 by Heinrich Himmler.

66]  What were the Dark Actors Playing Games, which the patriot Dr David Kelly referred?

67]  DEMOCRACY IS A DIALECTICAL FARCE BECAUSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES CALL THE SHOTS NOT SO-CALLED DEMOCRACIES.

68]  Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

69]  EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE.

70]  NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

71]   WHY NO TREATY LIMITING EU POWERS

72]   THE E.U.’S VERY OWN AESOPIAN LANGUAGE.

73]    WHAT IF ENGLAND HADN'T JOINED THE EU

74]   67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM EU

75]   WILL IRELAND SAVE EUROPE FROM ITSELF?

76]   WHY EU REGIONAL POLICY WILL DESTROY THE NATION STATE

77]   EMPIRES HAVE GONE AND MOST PEOPLE LIVE IN NATION STATES.

78 THE FINAL BETRAYAL- WHICH TOOK PLACE IN 2008 

79]  WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR-NOW BROWN-SHE DIDN'T - BUT SOLD US TO THE EU80] 

80]  Almost everything ,which is precious in our civilisation, has come from small States

81]  THE EU BIG BROTHER POLICY REACHES BACK OVER TWO MILLENNIUM

82]   THE EURO A DOOMED CURRENCY

83]  GERMANY AS STRONG MAN OF EUROPE

84]  BRITAIN AND EUROPE-THE CULTURE OF DECEIT

85]  NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

86]  A BETTER WAY FORWARD TOGETHER IN EUROPE-OUT OF THE EUROPEAN UNIOn

87]   A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

88]   TO CONTROL OUR COURTS AND BORDERS IS THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL EUROSCEPTIC STRATEGY.

89] BLACK OPERATIONS AND TRICKERY BIND UK TO EU
90]  HITLER-HAUSHOFER AND GEORGE KENNON-PENTAGON PLANS IDENTICAL
91]  Oh Boyo - Family on Brussels gravy train cost TAXPAYER £34 million and RISING!
92]   NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

93]    WHY DID THEY WANT BRITAIN IN EUROPE -  IN 1963

94]   Lies and The Betrayal of Britain
95]    Be Warned - The lies of 1975 still haunt us
96]   THe Strange Case of the Werner Report
97]   1972 EU Communities Act
98]   Further 200 Reasons why to Reject the Euro and E
99]  New elite threatens EU project admits Lib-Dem Peer
100]     The secretive Bilderberger Group will destroy True Democracy
101] BBC EUROPHILE BIAS-UPDATE-by LORD PEARSON

102]   How ‘a good European’ turned into a eurosceptic whistle-blower

103]   HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

104]    IF Gordon Brown forces this EU TREATY on us, you can kiss goodbye to DEMOCRACY  -HE DID!
105]   FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ARE THE FUTURE OF WORLD TRADE
106]   Twelve Mighty Reasons why you must say 'No' to the EU

107]        How much does it cost the UK in the EU

108]   THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL
109]   IF MONETARY UNION GOES-EUROPEAN PROJECT IS UNDERMINED
110]      THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN
111]      YOU CAN'T SEPARATE POLITICS AND MORALS
112]      IRAQ SOCIETY DESCENDING INTO CIVIL WAR BETWEEN SUNNIS - SHI-ITES AND KURDS
113]         TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

www.eutruth.org.uk

S

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE-2009

H. F .11 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

 

 

FOREIGN AID SQUANDERED ON INANE FOREIGN PROJECTS ABROAD WHILE THE NHS CANNOT AFFORD DRUGS...TO SAVE LIVES

 

 

 

*

 

 

SHAMED: Foreign aid fat cats who built £1.4billion ... - Daily Mail

www.dailymail.co.uk/.../SHAMED-Foreign-aid-fat-cats-built-1-4billion-empire-tax-money.html

3 May 2015 ... Money wasted: The share of Britain's foreign aid budget delivered by contractors
tripled in two ... her life to this cause, working on projects often supported by
British ... corporation tax, while a second paid less than one per cent of profits in
tax. .... Yet DAI Europe could afford to pay staff an average salary of ...

 

British aid money is funding corruption overseas, damning new ...

www.telegraph.co.uk/.../British-aid-money-is-funding-corruption-overseas-damning-new-report-finds.html

1 Oct 2014 ... British taxpayers' money is funding corruption in foreign countries, an official ...
One development project in Nepal encouraged people to forge documents to
gain grants while police stations in Nigeria linked to British aid were ... revealed
in documents by Amnesty International, according to the Daily Mail.

 

[WHEN WILL THE GOVERNMENT INTRODUCE COMMON SENSE AND ACTION  TO SAVE THE PEOPLES HARD EARNED TAXES FROM BEING FURTHER SQUANDERED ON INANE-FOOLISH AND FRIVOLOUS  FOREIGN PROJECTS?

Why are we still seeing heart-breaking images on our TV screens of requests for monthly payments of £3 to provide a regular supply water in distressed areas in the world?

BUT WE SHOULD NOT BE SURPRISED BECAUSE BEING IN THE EU FOR THE PAST 45 YEARS HAS CREATED A LAXITY TO PRUDENT MONEY MANAGEMENT. AFTER ALL THERE IS MASSIVE CORRUPTION IN THAT EXCUSE FOR AN HONEST ADMINISTRATION   AS ITS ACCOUNTS HAVE NOT BEEN PASSED FOR

21 YEARS. 

 BILLIONS HAVE GONE MISSING OVER THE YEARS AND WE ALL KNOW THAT LAVISH PAYOUTS AND PENSIONS ARE A FEATURE OF THAT CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-GODLESS SUPPOSED EUROPEAN UNION.

WE ARE NOW LEAVING THAT CORRUPT SOULLESS MONSTER AND ITS ALIEN LAW SYSTEM BUT THE LONG CAPTIVITY  HAS TAINTED OUR  ONCE PRUDENT AND ONCE ETHICAL ADMINISTRATION WHICH WILL TAKE TIME TO CLEANSE AND REPORT CLEAR OF EU PRACTICES AND INFLUENCES.]

*

 

'When we build the house of Europe the future will belong to Germany.'

HELMUT KOHL (GERMAN POLITICIAN)

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

'Children are being taught that the EU is essential for England's future and that the euro offers the nation's only chance of future security. Both claims are lies-but even if they were true these are issues which need to be discussed not simply fed into young minds through-INDOCTRINATION. The EU gives GRANTS to areas where children are properly INDOCTRINATED about the value of the EU.' (2002)

WE clearly saw the result in the Referendum on June 23 ,2016.

*

AT HOME.

HOME-2006

See how we have been fighting to free our country of England from the  Hitler's plan for Germany to dominate Europe and particularly the UK who if not included would  as an established world trader would be a threat to the EU's further enlargement .After all Germany with its hoarded gold needed England to share the financial cost of maintaining the corrupt EU.

AUGUST 5-2017

Brussels scams can let an MEP fiddle £60,000 a year.

'A century or so ago men went  into politics when they had made their personal fortunes. They were unbribable because  they were rich. They had all the money and power they needed. They wanted recognition, immortality and respect. They also wanted (and today , sadly, this sounds strange) to serve their country.

Today's politicians, the ones who are selling England and our freedom, go into politics because they are ill-suited for anything else. They go into politics to make money. They are easy to bribe. They are always on the lookout for ways in which they can make money after they leave government. Today's professional politicians are brought up in a world where deception is everything and perception is not just more important than reality-it has replaced reality and is, to them, the only thing that matters.'

Vernon Coleman

H.F.1273 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

 

Brussels scams can let an

MEP fiddle £60,000 a year.

 

Daily Mail

Justin Stares in Brussels

Monday, April 11, 2005

 

 

 

[WHAT ENGLAND IS

 ESCAPING FROM SINCE JUNE 23, 2016.]

 

*

 

 

EU DICTATORSHIP EXPOSED - no codex genocide!

 

                        EUROPEAN DICTATORSHIP

 

                                The Treaty of Rome

 

          The Final Resurrection of the Holy Roman Empire

 

 

In the words of Winston Churchill and in reference to Stanley Baldwin who was Prime Minister at the time (exporting Rolls Royce aero engines to Germany) prior to the outbreak of World War II he spoke the following words:

 

“Whose in charge of the clattering train?   The axels creak and the couplings strain; the pace is hot and the points are near and sleep has deadened the driver’s ear and the signals flash through the night in vain for death is in charge of the clattering train”

                          

 

The Take-Over of Britain

 

On 1st January 1973, Conservative British Prime Minister Edward Heath took Britain into the European Common Market.   Heath reassured Parliament and the British people at the time that British sovereignty would not be affected and that we were just joining a trading partnership.   His 1971 government White Paper stated the following:

 

“There is no question of Britain losing essential national sovereignty…  The British safeguards of habeus corpus and trial by jury will remain intact.   So will the principle that a man is innocent until he has been proved guilty.”

 

Subsequent papers came to light, which unequivocally show that Edward Heath recognised that he had known all along that Britain was signing up to a federal Europe.

 

In a 1975 public referendum, reassured by their politicians and a politically biased media that all was well, the British voted 67% to 33% to remain inside the Common Market.   Later, it emerged that many sections of the British media were involved with promoting only favourable stories about the common Market.  Few opposing views were given an airing.

 

The post-war move towards European integration was to strengthen a devastated Europe as rapidly as possible and prevent any Soviet incursion.

 

The first form of collective integration among nations in Europe occurred in March 1951 with the setting up of the European Coal and Steel Community, which established a single market for steel, iron, coke and coal among the six participating nations:  France, Germany, Luxembourg, Italy, Holland and Belgium.

 

This union was later expanded by the Treaty of Rome into the European Economic Community, which set up a ‘Common Market’.   This treaty’s subtitle has always been ‘the ever closer union of the peoples of Europe’.   Politicians have always understood this to mean the destruction of their nations’ sovereignty and the eventual formation of a United States of Europe.   Even their populations are clear on this issue.

 

British politicians, both Labour and Conservative, have not been so forthcoming.   They have consistently misled the British people by repeatedly claiming that our involvement was trade-based only, and would never lead to the destruction of Britain as a sovereign nation.

 

Today, the UK’s three leading political parties are all in support of dismantling Great Britain.   At no general elections in the past 25 years have the British people ever been given a clear choice on Britain’s European membership, with all the options, including withdrawing from the EU altogether.  

 

Norway, Iceland, Switzerland and Greenland are not members of the EU and are doing very well on their own today.

 

Later amendments to the Treaty of Rome gradually stepped up the transfer of power and control of Britain from Westminster to Brussels.   These further treaty amendments were:

 

                   The Single European Act   -1986

                   The Treaty on European Union (‘Maastricht’) – 1992

                   The Amsterdam (Consolidated) Treaty – 1997

                   The Treaty of Nice – 2000

 

Through these further treaties, the original Common Market has gradually been changed into the European Union of today.   The British people have never given their consent, nor have properly understood the implications of the European Union.  

 

Today, Britain has been part of the European Union and its forerunner structures for a little over 30 years, yet there are few realistic benefits we have enjoyed for the massive expense and damage our membership has cost us.

 

The burdensome value-added tax was set up in Britain in anticipation for our forthcoming membership to the Common Market.   Most don’t know that VAT is an EU levy and not a national tax.

 

Your Citizenship

 

Upon signing the Maastrict Treaty, John Major declared that there would be  “…no further surrender of sovereignty.”  However, as soon as his ink was dry, millions of us ceased being British and became citizens of the European Union.

 

With this came all the rights and privileges of being a European citizen (not explained to the British people) as well as the duties and obligations of European citizenry according to the laws of Brussels.

 

In the blink of an eye, the British lost the right to do anything they please, as long as it was not forbidden by British law, and henceforth are only able to do those things specifically allowed by European directive and regulation.

 

While it is true that these laws are not currently being stringently enforced by Brussels, who’s prepared to wager that after the cooling-off period, the screws won’t be tightened slowly but progressively as time passes?    This is the way the European Union has historically operated.

 

Defence

 

Maastricht also articulated the EU’s desire to forma a common European Army.  Once more, the wording was weasely and circumlocutory and talked of a ‘common defence policy’.   Then we see the formation of something called a ‘Rapid Reaction Force’, supposedly only for operations outside the European Union.   Today, this has morphed into the ‘European Army’.   With the command restructuring of British troops under foreign officers underway, this will also mean foreign troops and police on British soil.

 

Law

 

Maastricht introduced far-reaching changes to our judicial system.   After Maastricht, Britain’s supreme court ceased to be the House of Lords and became the European Court of Justice (ECJ).   Once again, the transfer of power and visible jurisdiction has been slow and non-threatening, but today, European law has 100% legal supremacy over British law and Burssels holds almost all the law-making powers applicable to our nation.

 

 

 

Single Currency – Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)

 

Maastrickt also laid out a schedule for complete European economic integration (known as Economic and Monetary Union – EMU) using a single currency, formerly known as the European Currency Unit (ECU), now known as ‘the euro’.   The increased drive towards establishing a single currency across the Euro zone is perhaps one of the most significant factors to emerge from Maastricht.   Since 1992, the pound’s days have been numbered.   Yet Harold Wilson had sought to reassure the British public in a 1975 pamphlet that…

 

“There was a threat to employment in Britain from the movement in the Common Market towards an Economic and Monetary Union  [EMU].   This could have forced us to accept fixed exchange rates for the pound, restricting industrial growth and so putting jobs at risk.   This threat has been removed.”

 

Britain joining the euro will be the final step towards the destruction of our country as an independent, sovereign nation.   All the while Britain remains this side of EMU, she is still able to recover full independence should a majority of the country desire it and compel their politicians to act in accordance with the wishes of this majority.   If Britain adopts the euro however, the final three bricks drop out of the crumbling wall of British independence, and we will ultimately and at this time:

 

        Surrender the remainder of our gold, silver and dollar reserves to

        Brussels;

        Surrender the last of our economic control over our own nation;

       And surrender the last of our independent political power to govern

       Ourselves.

 

After this, there will be no turning back, short of war.

 

Joining the euro will be irreversible.

 

Regionalisation

 

The much touted ‘devolution’ process, which gave Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland their own assemblies, is simply the Maastricht regionalisation policy being implemented by stealth.   Today, the EU’s full title is ‘The European Union of the Regions’.   Planners in Brussels have divided the current EU land-mass into 111 regions, with Britain having 12. Each region across the Euro zone will henceforth be run from Brussels.

 

Regionalisation is an effective way to destroy the concept of a nation with national boundaries.   The EU has been very active for years in forging links at the local government level throughout the UK to bring this about.

 

One method Brussels has used to get co-operation from local councils has been the promise of funds for development projects in their local communities.   There’s nothing like EU cash (which British taxpayers provided in the first place) to build useful things in the community to enhance a local or even a European politician’s popularity with their public.

 

Another forerunner program implemented to soften up the British to the idea of accepting closer ties with their Continental neighbours is the town and village twinning scheme.

 

EU Democracy?

 

The EU Parliament has been directly elected by the citizens of the European Union since 1979, which all sounds democratic, but there are some fundamental problems.   Unlike the British Parliament, the EU Parliament cannot introduce, modify or initiate new laws.   It cannot elect a government.   The functions of EU government are performed not by the EU Parliament, but by three powerful EU forums (the EU Commission, the Council of Europe and the Council of Ministers), in conjunction with the European Court of Justice and the European Central Bank.   The EU Parliament is widely recognised as toothless – rubber-stamping legislation that is put before it with no informed debate on these new laws.

 

There are currently 626 seats in the EU Parliament with the following breakdown:  Belgium 25;  Denmark 16; France 87; Germany 99; Greece 25; Ireland 15; Italy 87; Luxembourg 6; Netherlands 31; Portugal 25; Spain 64; United Kingdom 87; Austria 21; Sweden 22 and Finland 16.  

 

Under the terms of the Amsterdam Treaty, the number of MEPs is not to exceed 700.   The European Union is due to be enlarged by another 10 members, mostly East European, ex-Soviet satellite states, on 1st May 2004.

 

Voting is performed by MEPs at tremendous speed.   One session saw MEPs vote on 187 pieces of legislation in just one hour.

 

The EU Parliament has the appearance of democracy, but upon closer inspection, the truth is very different.   It is a beard for another type of regime that really calls the shots from Brussels:  one that is fundamentally unaccountable, undemocratic, unelectable and corrupt.

 

Qualified Majority Voting

 

In 1975, the public was reassured by Harold Wilson that Britain would always be able to use her national veto in Brussels to reject or vote down any measure that was perceived to be a threat to her national interests.   Under the Single European Act however, a new system, known as Qualified Majority Voting (QMV), was introduced which effectively put the clock on Britain’s right to exercise her veto option.

 

Since Margaret Thatcher signed the Single European Act in 1985, QMV has gradually taken over and pushed the national veto out.   It takes 62 votes under QMV to pass a law and 26 votes to block one.   Britain has 10 votes under QMV, which means, given the current allegiances between countries in the EU, that Britain is powerless to refuse in many major areas of policy today, since almost everything the EU implements is decided by qualified majority voting.   Britain has a problem mustering sufficient votes from any EU allies to gain the number required to overturn any damaging legislation.

 

With Britain’s current EU voting powers in European elections, the British people can only vote out 14% of MEPs (unlike 100% of them at Westminster).   This will dwindle to less than 10% once the EU is enlarged further on 1st May 2004 to admit ten further member states.  Later, there could be no British Members of the European Parliament representing our country, as future MEPs need not be British.   At this point, our national government at Westminster will be redundant, since Britain has already been divided into 12 Euro-Regions, each of which is increasingly ruled directly from Brussels.   Soon there will be no further need for any national political candidates.

 

Immunity from Prosecution

 

All members of the EU’s governing structure, together with the tens of thousands of bureaucrats and civil servants who run the union, have been granted a lifetime immunity from prosecution.   This also goes for the new European police force, Europol, and the commanders and soldiers of the new European Army.   All buildings, offices, records, archives and minutes belonging to the EU and its institutions are inviolate.   They cannot be entered or inspected.   All personnel serving the EU are above the law, as declared in treaties which our successive politicians have signed on our behalf.

 

Funding of Political Parties

 

Under article 191 of the Treaty of Nice, the EU has been granted the power by its member states to withdraw funding for any European political party it deems inappropriate or unsuitable for Europe, which, of course, raises the spectre of the banning of political parties that criticise the European Union.

 

Human Rights

 

Perhaps most disturbingly, we see a continuation of the erosion of human rights under Article 52, which states:

 

“the EU may limit all rights and freedoms enumerated in that charter where necessary in order to meet objectives of general interest recognised by the EU.” 

 

This means that the state can limit/withdraw (abuse) the human rights of the individual at whim and is not answerable to anyone for doing so.   This is about as alien to the British way of life as it gets.

 

When coupled with the frightening powers now being bestowed upon upon Europol and the European prosecutor, perhaps the first the British will truly learn of what their country has become is when summary arrests of citizens are made in our country and those detainees are then shunted out of Britain to be held without charge on the Continent, if necessary for up to nine months, before being tried, not by a jury of the accused’s peers, but by a tribunal of professional, politically appointed foreign judges.

 

There will be no presumption of innocence until proven guilty, no prima facie evidence presented to a court within 24 hours.   The full weight of the state’s prosecutory apparatus will be brought to bear against the prisoner, who is burdened with the hopeless task of having to prove he is not guilty.   There will be little hope of an effective appeal.

 

Why Britain Does Not Belong to Europe

 

“Europe’s nations should be guided towards the super state without their people understanding what is  happening.   This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.”  -  Jean Monnet, one of the EU’s founders

 

Britain was the first maritime power, so historically she has always traded globally, especially with her erstwhile colonies and international allies, whilst her trade with Europe has been secondary.   For this reason, Britain’s economy is more in step with those of America, Canada and her other allies, than it is with Europe.  For example, Britain conducts more trade with the USA than she does with France and Germany combined.

 

The intention to bring Britain’s economy under control of Brussels and somehow ‘harmonise it’ with those of the Continent will be a disastrous move for us and, as we shall see, is a strategy deliberately designed to break the United Kingdom as a historical, economic world power.   The priceless spoils of Britain’s wealth are to go to other European nations under control of Brussels.

 

“But Britain is a part of Europe geographically!   So why wouldn’t we want to be a part of Europe politically in order to keep the peace?”    

 

Peace has been kept in Europe for the past fifty years, not through attempts at creating a unified Europe, but through the willingness of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) to act as a universal European military watchdog.   NATO is a military alliance of nations dominated by the two leading powers formerly comprising ‘the Allies’ during World War II – the United States of American and Great Britain.

 

The Americans spend more on the defence of Europe than all the eurozone nations put together.

 

The European Union is planning a new European arm capable of taking strategic action independently of NATO.   This new European army will threaten the balance and stability NATO has given to the Continent and hand over military jurisdiction in Europe once again to the two nations who have historically abused it and gone to war for their own economic interests.

 

Wars chiefly happen over issues of economics.   By creating a single currency throughout Europe and hamstringing less fortunate member states to join at unfavourable exchange rates, the EU is creating an alarming new climate of inflexibility and impending European instability.   The expected problems of the weak new single currency – the euro – are already becoming apparent.

 

Britain is an economic powerhouse, is the fourth largest economy in the world by Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and has the greatest financial trading centre in the world centred in London.   It is sheer nonsense to maintain that Britain somehow needs the European Union to survive.

 

Britain is the European Union’s biggest customer.

 

The Terminal Power-Play for Britain

 

Is the real agenda being worked out against Britain by Brussels designed to dismantle the UK, plunder her of her historic wealth and resources, and then politically chain her so she can never again be free to operate in her traditional role as a world trading power?

 

There are a number of reasons, in the eyes of those running the EU, why Britain must cease to be a major world player and be dismantled for the future good of Europe.   Today, as we shall see, every effort by the EU towards Britain is undertaken with this eventual goal in mind.   From the destruction of the UK’s once proud fishing industry to the victimisation of her farming communities to render the UK dependent on EU food, the pressure is on for European bureaucrats and politicians to expedite this baleful agenda before the British people full awaken to what is happening.

 

So Why is it Happening?

 

History reveals that Continental politics have always spelled trouble for Britain.   We have always had a different destiny from the rest of our Continental neighbours for one simple and straightforward reason.   Britain was the nation which became the first industrial and maritime world power.

Britain was the first to develop and use her huge merchant and military navies to annexe foreign territories and then open trade with them around the world.

 

While nations in Europe still pursued parochial trade with their immediate neighbours, the cutters of the British East India Company carved their wake through the oceans, bring all manner of exotic materials to British shores.

 

Britain extended her Anglo-Saxon heritage into the Americas, Canada, India, South Africa, Asia, Australia and New Zealand, as well as building strategic military bastions in Gibraltar, Hong Kong and other areas to protect her interests.   During the 18th and 19th centuries, her economic and military influence grew exponentially.

 

Magna Carta (1215) and subsequently the Declaration of Rights (1689) recognised our rights and freedoms and are contracts between the sovereign and the people which cannot be abrogated even by an elected parliament.

 

In Britain, we have enjoyed the freedom to engage in any activity so long as it isn’t prohibited by law.   In Europe, a citizen is only allowed to do those thing expressly permitted by the state.   Hence the need for a blizzard of directives to tell the citizen what he can and cannot do.

 

The EU is protectionist.   The British, on the other hand, positively encourage free enterprise, sensible risk-taking, and actively nurture individual spontaneity and entrepreneurial endeavour.   These are “freedom ‘ traits, which reaped the Empire and her citizens an enormous collective wealth in their day, and which even still entice a huge amount of inward investment capital and foreign corporate endeavour today.   The famous British eccentricity, celebrated and loved in countless movies, is the hallmark of this individuality.

 

Britain – an Economic Threat to the Continent

 

Nazi economist Professor Horst Jecht, of Berlin University, firmly believed that Britain was the single greatest obstacle to Germany fulfilling her historic aim of dominating Europe economically as well as militarily.   Jecht puts his case in his 1942 essay,  “Developments towards the European Economic Community”:

 

“The foundation for this remarkable development of England was laid back in the period between the 16th and 18th centuries where maritime superiority was gained and a global, colonial empire acquired.   By the end of this period, countries outside Europe accounted for 40% of England’s export trade.   This development continued until World War 1.   In 1913, these countries accounted for 56% and 65% of her imports and exports respectively.   Foreign capital investment levels in these countries also started to grow significantly.

 

Since modern times, England’s economy has developed more and more away from Europe and not only during the period of English free trade.   It became even more pronounced when there was protection and closer economic and political union with the nations of the empire, particularly at the time of the Ottawa agreements of 1932.   British trade became even more concentrated overseas and, like the figure of 1913, in 1937 British exports outside Europe reached 64%.

 

In this essay and subsequent address to the Berlin economic conference during the Second World War, Dr Jecht concludes by explaining that Germany’s true role is to lead the future new economic order of Europe after the Second World War hostilities end.   Germany’s eventual defeat in 1945 however changer her immediate destiny, but not her post-World War II desire eventually to dominate Europe, a role she is well on the way to achieving today.

 

Facts:

 

The European government now has its own parliament, flag, supreme court, currency and anthem and is currently setting up its own written constitution, foreign policy, armed forces, federal police force and legal system.

 

The new European Army is headed up by a German general.

 

Europol is headed up by a German police officer.

 

The EU treaties which bind Britain to Europe take precedence over Acts of Parliament and are binding ab initio.  This means that if we are outvoted in Brussels on a proposed piece of legislation, that new law must nevertheless be implemented in Britain, no matter the cost or damage involved, on pain of unlimited fines in the Luxembourg Court.

 

Our national veto, once held out as the carrot, giving Britons the impression that they could always say no, has now been withdrawn in almost every area.   In plain English, if Britain doesn’t like any encroaching Brussels legislation which she believes will harm British interests, economy and culture, there is nothing she can do about it.

 

Under the current EU voting system, 62 out of 87 votes are required to pass a law, 26 votes are required to block one.   The UK only has 10 votes under the Qualified Majority Voting System (QMV), and can rarely must the support needed to increase her votes over 26 to block legislation that can be harmful to Britain.   This is one of the main tools of the acquis communautaire – ‘the ratchet’ – the mechanism that decrees that once Brussels has acquired power from the nation states, that power can never be given back.   This is the method by which Britain has already been extensively damaged by our European ‘partners’ who do not share our cultural or global trading perspectives.

 

The EU treaties do not contain any exit clause and so do not provide for any member state to reject any law, or even their entire European membership AT ANY TIME.   The idea that Britain can somehow ‘renegotiate’ her terms of membership, or pick and choose which parts she goes along with and which she rejects, is completely false.

 

John Major discovered this when he believed he had renegotiated a measure of national independence for Britain at Maastricht in 1992.   He later found that his wishes were cynically ignored through a technical loophole in the third line of the agreement had had signed.

 

The question of whether Britain should remain in the EU has scarcely featured in any general election campaign during the past 25 years.   This option is avoided at all costs by almost all politicians and simply not made available by any of the three major political parties in Britain.

 

 

SELLING BRITAIN BY THE POUND

 

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.   Already they have raised up a money aristocracy that has set the government at defiance.” – Thomas Jefferson, at the Constitutional Convention, 1787.

 

“Monetary union is a path of no return.   No subsequent revision or withdrawal of any kind is either legally or politically provided for.”  -  Hans Tietmeyer, the German Buindesbank

 

“If the House of Commons by any possibility loses the power of the control of the grants of public money, depend upon it, your very liberty will be worth very little in comparison.”   W.E. Gladstone, 1891

 

“By a continuous process of inflation, government can confiscate secretly and unobserved an important part of the wealth of their citizens… The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does so in such a manner that only one man in a million is able to diagnose it.”  John Maynard Keynes,  The Economic Consequences of Peace

 

Smoke and Mirrors

 

Today, Britain is being lured into joining the European single currency with lies, false promises and deceit.   Politicians attempting to pass this off as an economic issue to the public know full well that the euro is about nothing less than the complete surrender of the Uks economic and political sovereignty to a foreign power.   Which is why the debate on the euro is almost never entered into publicly by those who push it.   Greg Lance-Watkins of Silent Majority tells us why:

 

“It follows that by joining the single currency, member states hand over total control of their economy to Brussels.   Individual policies are subsumed within the (one size fits all) system of the EU.   This will apply even where the overall EU policy is disadvantageous to a particular or number of individual states.   In other words, the economic control of a country is taken out of the hands of the national government and given to unelected officials in Brussels.   At the same time, all gold and dollar reserves, apart from a small ‘working balance’, are given up and handed to the European Central Bank.”

 

How many British pro-euro politicians have told the British people that one of the first ignominous acts we would have to commit as a nation in joining the euro would be to hand over $48 billion-worth of our total gold and dollar reserves to the European Central Bank, along with our control over setting interest and exchange rates that suit us?   In fact, the great gold transfer got underway when British Chancellor Gordon Brown sold more than half of Britain’s holdings in gold to prop up the euro.   Who in Britain cared anyway?   Notice that these moves behind the scenes would also prevent Britain from backing out of the euro at some future point and having sufficient gold and dollar assets to underpin a re-launch of the pound. 

 

 

How accountable is the European Central Bank with all this money of ours?   As with other EU institutions, the ECB is famously about as scrutable as a battalion of Mongol horsemen.   The Financial Times advises:  “ECB intends to make decisions in secret, using forecasts it will not reveal, to achieve objectives it does not need to justify.”

 

No Turning Back

 

Sir Edward George, former governor of the Bank of England, reminds us, the euro has less to do with economics as it does with politics.   Britain ditching its traditional, strong, independent sterling currency may rightly be viewed, in the yes of her old enemies, Franc and Germany, as her final defeat.

 

Article 109L.4 of the Maastrich Treat declares that the process of monetary integration with Europe is ‘irrevocable’.   This means that if the British people don’t like the euro or the interest rates compelled upon us during the integration process, too bad – we’re stuck with them.   This would be a very costly mistake for the British people to make.   Only a successful war of disassociation/secession would enable Britain once again to re-establish her national independence from Europe.

 

To fight a war, you need troops, equipment, money and people willing to sacrifice their lives for the independence ideal.   Perhaps the British won’t lack the desire to regain their independence once they have been a part of the EU’s version of an integrated Europe for a few years.   Getting some serious fighting kit together however would be an entirely different matter.   By this time, Brussels would own our country’s army, navy air force and law enforcement, lock, stock and gun barrel.

 

Even if Britain succeeded in forcefully breaking away from the EU after it had integrated (a doubtful prospect), how could Britain then re-launch her old currency if her gold, silver and dollar reserves have been seized?

 

Where the Rubber Meets the Road

 

The Economic and Monetary Union concept (EMU) is vitally important to the european federal architects, for the euro IS federal Europe.   Having control of the one currency means that the EU Commission and its central bank control everything.   This is a frightening prospect when considering the corruption and lack of accountability within the EU, and secondly, that Britain would have only a marginal say in how she would be governed in the future.

 

The idea of running one centrally controlled, Soviet-style economy throughout Europe is not a new idea… but it IS a disastrous one.   What similarity does the humble economy of Portugal have with the mighty colossus of German?   How does Britain’s global monster economy in any way compare with the parochial tailings of Greece?   One economy throughout Europe means one set of interest rates, uniformly high tax rates, VAT on everything and a deluge of laws and directives controlling the lives of the Euro-citizen down to the finest detail from birth until death.   Socialism indeed.   Then there will be the tax hikes to pay for it all.

 

Tax Increases for all, Especially Britain

 

For Britain to join the continental monetary union, her income tax rates would need to be significantly raised in order to harmonise with those of the remainder of the Eurozone.   Estimates say the UK tax rise could be as much as 20%.  Big socialist government is always hungry for cash to run its endless departments, so VAT in Britain is expected to be expanded to include everything from books to food and could be hiked to a standard rate of 25%. 

 

If these rises are put forward as Single Market legislation, Britain will almost certainly be outvoted, as Europe desperately needs our cash.   We can, of course, appeal to the Luxembourg Court and try to have the measures overturned.   But we know what the outcome of that will be, don’t we?

 

Lord Pearson of Rannoch, who has been tracking the downside to Britain’s existing membership of the European Union, states in his briefing document  ‘Better Off Out’  that areas tremendously hit with increased costs, restrictive and asinine Euro directives and meddling from Brussels include our air space, armed forces, boat building industry,  cheese-makers, civil service, chocolate, dairy farmers, duty-free shopping, freedom of religion, hedgerows, alternative/natural medicines, legal system, the trucking industry, market gardeners, oak trees, pheasant shooting and the rights of countryside dwellers, ponies, postal service, sexual discrimination, taxis, waste disposal, water, whisky, the working week, the roast beef of Old England and the London bus.

 

The British Support the Euro?

 

Michael Howard declared:

 

“Tony Blair, Jack Straw and their colleagues repeatedly said during the general election campaigns of 1997 and 2001 that those elections were not about the euro.   The euro would put at risk jobs, homes and livelihoods.   It has never been endorsed by the British people.”

 

In 1997 Tony Blair vowed:  “The final say will be with the British people in a referendum.”

 

Speaking in Edinburgh in 2001 during his election campaign, he stated:  “It is you, the British people, who will have the decision in your hands in a referendum.”

 

Eurosceptic Labour MP Ian Davidson declared that Mr Straw was trying to Breathe life into a corpse.”

 

He asked:  “Why do we, with low unemployment and high growth, want to join an economic zone that is a disaster, that is not working collectively?”

 

Europe adopts a highly regulated and restrictive, zero free-market approach with inflexible movements of labour, no doubt hampered by the diversity of language and culture.

 

Enlarging the Union

 

Following the Copenhagen Summit, the EU will admit 10 more economically weak candidates as of 1st May 2004:  Malta, Cyprus, Lithuania, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Slovenia.

 

The sordid, penny-market haggling over the subsidies and cash hand-outs to be made available to the new members was typical of the economics of the EU madhouse, the same amateur economics ordinary citizens around the Euro zone have been waking up to since the euro went solo on the streets at the beginning of 2002.

 

New Labour

 

Mr Blair is intent on proving himself one of the Euro-faithful by rebutting euro-dissenters with all the spin and duplicity of a medieval Italian town:

 

“Britain turning its back on Europe would be an error of vast proportions.   Be under no doubt:  if the economic tests are met, Britain should join the single currency.   For Britain to be marginalised in Europe when soon the EU will have 25 members stretching from Portugal to Poland and the largest commercial market in the world, would not just be economically unwise, it would betray a total misunderstanding of the concept of national interest in the 21st century.”

 

Yet as a junior minister in 1982 Mr Blair declared:

 

“Above all, the EEC takes away Britain’s freedom to follow the economic policies we need.   ~We will negotiate withdrawal from the EEC which has drained our natural resources and destroyed our jobs.”

 

Brussels correspondent for the Daily Telegraph, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, explained that Tony Blair’s personal eminence and influence in Europe has only been secured by trading off a staggering amount of EU integration over the past five years.

 

“…The abolition of sterling, in principle;  the EU-wide arrest warrants for felonies, including thought crimes such as xenophobia [a dislike of foreigner]); a proto FBI/CIA rolled into one at Europol;  the Social Chapter, which has subtly overturned our trade union laws and forced Britain to adopt a disturbingly large number of Germany’s labour-market rigidities;  anti-discrimination laws that force employers to prove their innocence in court, contravening a core principle of our common law [that a person is innocent until proven guilty];  the Charter of Fundamental Rights – an insidious misnomer – containing a clause authorising suspension of all civic rights, if necessary, in the ‘general interest of the Union’; and now a European constitution, switching our final jurisdiction from the House of  Lords to the European Court.”

 

Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM)

 

In October 1990, the Conservative Government of Margaret Thatcher committed Britain to the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM), a forerunner experiment to the euro and monetary union, which effectively locked the pound into other EU currencies.

 

During the 23 months of chaos that followed:

 

·        British business suffered its worst recession in 60 years.

·        100,000 UK businesses went to the wall.

·        Unemployment doubled from 1.5 to 3 millions.

·        More bankruptcies were filed than in any previous 2-year period EVER.

·        Repossessions of property increased seven times to 32,000.

·        By 1993, 511,000 were at least three months in arrears on their mortgages.

·        Britain lost estimated reserves of £68 billion.

 

 

To avoid total economic collapse and national bankruptcy, Britain was forced out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism on 16th September 1992, Black Wednesday.   Although the damaged caused by the ERM was not permanent, this will not be true for Britain joining the euro.   There will be no ability to exit the arrangement, whatever the damage caused.

 

Joining the euro will be irreversible.   If something goes wrong there will be no provision available for Britain to re-launch the pound.   To launch a currency requires considerable gold, silver and dollar reserves – the very reserves our politicians have been talked into handing over to the European Central Bank.

 

Europe has amassed unfunded pensions liabilities amounting to a staggering $1.2 trillion.   If Britain joins the euro and full monetary union with the Continent, our share of this huge debt could be £30,000 for every British man, woman and child, according to media financial reports issued in October 1996.

 

Abolishing the pound is about abolishing Britain’s independence and control over her own affairs.   Adopting the euro could be the worst and perhaps final mistake Britain would make as an independent nation.   It could amount to permanent fiscal damnation and cause us to inherit all liabilities and debts of Europe while handing over all our assets and reserves.

 

 

Britain – A Sterling Place to do Business

 

The Bank of England’s governor, Sir Edward George, stated in early September 2002 that interest rates could be set at the wrong level for Britain if we joined the euro, resulting in a potential and permanent disaster for our economy.

 

Britain has been thriving outside the single currency, which only demonstrates that the whole euro issue is not about generating wealth which we already enjoy, but about scrapping our national sovereignty.

It is political as distinct from economic incompetence that has fouled up our economy within the past 50 years.   The evidence for this is overwhelming.

 

If the euro is supposed to stabilise the spending of the member states of the Eurozone, as well as offer a credible currency to rival the dollar, then supporters of the single currency need to explain the observable reality of a euro that is struggling to stay afloat ever since its inauspicious birth, and why Britain even needs to change at all.

 

Lord Pearson of Rannoch advises in his ‘Better Off Out’ pamphlet:

 

“Brussels’ dictates are inflicted upon the whole of our economy, so the real point is that only some 10% of our Gross Domestic Product are involved in trade with the EU (declining and in deficit).   Rather more than 10% of our GDP goes to the rest of the world (growing and in surplus).   The remaining 80% of our jobs and GDP depend on our domestic economy.   So the insignificant 10% tail is wagging our healthy 90% dog.”

 

Brussels Moves the Goal Posts … Again

 

Germany, France, Italy and Portugal have not been punished for contravening the deficit limit, as the Pact dictates, but instead have been given an extra two years and told to balance their books, something not even the EU has been able to do with its own accounts.

 

This leniency has been shown despite the fact that other EU member governments have dutifully tried to carry out measures to conform to the Pact which have been politically damaging for them at home.

 

Some analysts see this caving-in by Brussels as an unmistakable sign that the amount of debt accruing within the Union is becoming critical and the currency is in danger of losing its credibility and could eventually collapse.   Brussels is seen to be frantically avoiding a confrontation which could alienate her two leading players, France and Germany.

 

What About all those EU Rebates?

 

Most in Britain think the EU is handing Britons large sums of Eurocash in return for its membership.   Some people reason that the aggravation Britain gets from Brussels is worth tolerating if we are supposed to be getting the cash.

 

The idea that the EU gives Britain anything beneficial is ridiculous.  Figures show that we paid the EU £8.96 billion in 2000, and received back around £5 billion through EU spending in the UK and our ‘rebate’.

 

So here’s the real situation.   We give Brussels around £9 billion of our own hard-earned money, only to have them give £5 billion of it back and tell us how to spend it – this, based on the pretzel-twisting logic that the EU somehow knows better than we do how to spend our own money – of course, with all the EU restrictions on what we can and can’t do with our own wealth!

 

Meanwhile, the other £4 billion goes towards:

 

·        Enriching French farmers via the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP);

·        Decommissioning British fishing boats so that Spain and other nations can fish our waters instead;

·        Baling out the poorer EU countries;

·        Paying bureaucrats to draft an insane quantity of regulations that routinely damage Britain’s economic and strategic interests…

 

That is, if the money doesn’t take a one-way dive into the £6 billion part of the EU’s annual budget that disappears in fraud and corruption every year.

 

Conversion to the New Currency

 

Parking meters, cigarette vending machines, tills, the entire banking system, credit card systems – all will have to be dismantled, modified or reprogrammed.

 

Predictably, we have been told by Europe that these costs must be borne by the British taxpayer.   Tony Blair announced that he would earmark some £3.5 billion to fund the changeover of currencies in the public sector.   The ultimate cost of converting the entire country however has been estimated at a staggering £30 billion-plus – that is hundreds of pounds for every man woman and child in the UK – all to be borne by the business sector and their customers.  

 

Corruption and Fraud

 

AAt least 10% of the European Union’s £60-plus billion budget disappears in fraud and mismanagement every year!   The corruption and double-dealing going on in Brussels alone should be enough to compel Britain to leave the EU immediately.  But who is speaking up?

 

Paul van Buitenen did.   He was the EU-appointed auditor who brought down Jacques Santer’s Europ0ean government on fraud charges by highlighting the worst financial scandal in Euroland’s history.   Van Buitenen was able to show that billions of euros had been ‘misappropriated’ by members of the EU elite, such as French commissioner, Edith Cresson, whose live-in dentist became an unlikely beneficiary.

 

Because of his revelations, the EU swung ponderously but predictably into action.   Van Buitenen was subsequently suspended without pay by the EU Commission, the very target of his corruption investigations, for doing his job, while the officials he had accused of serious crimes were themselves suspended on full pay.   Van Buitenen was later vindicated when a further panel upheld his accusations, resulting in the resignation of Santer’s entire EU Commission in 1999.

 

Yet, such is the extent of the corruption, mediocrity and incompetence going on within the EU that the fraud has continued without check under Mr Prodi’s successive regime.   Later, van Buitenen published his best-seller, ‘Blowing the Whistle’ but Europe’s citiz43ns remained, as always, apathetic and careless at the revelations.

 

The last straw for van Buitenen was the Gestapo-like treatment of the Eus chief accountant, marta Andreasen, who had the temerity to declare that the EU’s £60 billion-plus budget was simply ‘out of control’ and ‘massively open to fraud’.   Figures could be altered ‘without leaving any trace’, she reported, and the EU’s accounting system didn’t even used double entry book-keeping, the basic standard of accounting accuracy throughout the world. 

 

Ex-Labour leader Neil Kinnock is a good example of how the lure of Brussels can tempt politicians wishing to avoid the professional wilderness in their own country to extend their shelf life.   Neil Kinnock never gained the confidence of the British people and so was never elected to office in the UK.   Neil Kinnock was one of the Brussels commissioners for Britain, appointed by Conservative opponent John Major.  Tony Blair would do the same to rival Chris Patten, no doubt to get them off the opposing benches at Westminster.

 

Mr Kinnock, in his role as the officially appointed EU sleaze-buster, offered any whistleblowers protection from ‘adverse consequences’ if they came clean, then promptly reneged on his offer of ‘protection’ in the case of Ms Andreasen, and even stood by and approved her sacking by the Commission, which again was the very target of Ms Andreasen’s corruption concerns.   Mr Kinnock was thus able to give the public another opportunity to see for themselves how much his word is really worth.

 

Mr Kinnock knows full well that financial irregularities in the EU’s accounts have prevented accountants at the Court of Auditors from signing them off for eight years in a row.   In fact, in a report issued a few weeks prior to Andreasen’s professional execution, the Court waqrned of massive failings in the system which could not even record how many billions of pounds were being wasted through fraud each year.   Even Britain’s own National Audit Office found ‘persistent weaknesses’ in fraud checks by EU states earlier in 2002.

 

Shadow Deputy Prime Minister David Davis was outraged:  “Is there or isn’t there a double-entry accounting system?   Because if there isn’t, then it is unlike any other accounting system in the world that anyone respects.”

 

But why should any of this concern Neil Kinnock?  His own professional shortcomings haven’t prevented him from being very comfortable today.   At the time of writing, the EU earns his family up to £500,000 a year, taking into account his salary as the Commission’s vice-president, his luxury three-storey home in Belgium’s capital, all the perks, expense accounts and the salaries of his wife Glenys, his son Stephen, and Stephen’s wife, Helle, a Danish MEP.   All paid for, courtesy of the Euro-taxpayer.

 

Above the Law

 

Under Article 12 of Chapter 5 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the EU, a blanket, life-time immunity has been extended to all officials like Neil Kinnock and their servants of the institutions, which reads as follows:

 

“In the territory of each member state and whatever their nationality, officials and other servants of the Communities shall… be immune from legal proceedings in respect of acts performed by them in their official capacity, including their words (spoken or written).  They shall continue to enjoy this immunity after they have ceased to hold office.”

 

So, in 1999, when the entire EU Commission was found to have been involved in fraud, not one individual could be prosecuted.   How’s that for accountability?

 

Article 1, Chapter 1, Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the EC) states that “…premises and buildings of the Communities shall be exempt from search, requisition, confiscation or expropriation, and their archives shall be inviolable…”   Thus no buildings or offices, filing cabinets, archives or bottom drawers belonging to the EU, wherever they are located, can be searched or inspected… ever.   These two exemptions alone place the people and premises of the EU completely above the law, which flies in the face of the basic principle of British or any decent democracy that ‘no-one is above the law’.

 

Drawn and Quartered

 

(Art. 198a Maastricht) The full title of the European Union is “The European Union of the Regions’.   Within the EU there are, at present, 111 separate regions, due to be expanded with enlargement due on 1st May 2004.   In many of the continental countries, a form of regional government has been common for decades, especially in France, Germany, Spain and Italy.

 

The British Government has, for the past few years, encouraged so-called ‘devolution’ within the UK, transferring regional power from Westminster to Wales,  Scotland and Northern Ireland.   How coincidental is it then that the ‘devolved’ regions in Britain exactly match the map of the regions of the European Union?

 

EU Document 501 PC0083 “sets up the nomenclature of statistical units as a single, coherent system for dividing up the EU’s territory…”   All twelve EU regions in the UK are classified by the letters ‘UK’ plus a further letter to identify the individual region, thus:

 

North Eastern  (UKC)

North West  (UKD)

Yorks & Humberside (UKE)

East Midlands (UKF)

West Midlands (UKG)

East  (UKI)

London (UKI)

South East (UKJ)

South West (UKK)

Wales   (UKL)

Scotland (UKM)

Northern Ireland (UKN)

 

The

‘devolution’ process which saw Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland setting up their own parliaments was, in reality, merely the EU’s  usual way of giving with one hand while taking away with the other.   The landmasses of Scotland and Wales and Northern Ireland, as well as the Irish Republic, are already established regions of the European Union, now increasingly ruled directly from Brussels.

 

England must be broken up into 9 regions.   The United Kingdom, as a sovereign union, will officially cease to exist perhaps as early as 2008.

 

This is all going to lead to a nightmare of control, corruption and cynical unaccountability fostered by national governments and their comfortable politicians who care not one jot about the citizens of Europe, let alone the people of Britain?

 

Justice for All

 

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) is located in Luxembourg and is based on the American Supreme Court blueprint.   It was largely the inspiration of one of the founders of the EU, Jean Monnet, and his friend and confidante, US Supreme Court Justice, Felix Frankfurter.

 

·        No appeal is available in the ECJ.   Its decisions are absolute.

 

·        The all-male judge teams are both unelected and unaccountable under EU law.   They are free to do whatever they please and there is no legal comeback.   Further, the judges are not required to have any judicial experience whatsoever.   Most do not.

 

·        The kernel of the ECJ’s power is derived from the Treaty of Rome, Article 249.   The wording is deliberately generalised, enabling Brussels to extend the widest possible interpretations to these, and other clauses of the Treaty:  “A regulation shall have general application [what does ‘general’ mean?]    It shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States…”

 

·        Thus the European Court of Justice has been given powers ‘with no restriction’ over the member states.   This effectively places British citizens under the control of a foreign power and is intended to remove forever Britain’s right to govern herself.   This represents the abandonment of our nation.   Any British politician currently allowing this, or who has participated in orchestrating these efforts in the past, has committed treason under the Treason Act of 1795 and the Treason Felony Act of 1848.

 

·        National parliaments are now mere rubber stamps for all the legislation pouring out of Brussels.   Legally elected British MPs can turn back none of it.

 

·        The EU is abolishing trial by jury under the new European corpus juris system being introduced in Britain.  Once the system is in place, an indicted individual will have to prove his innocence against the combined machinery of the state.

 

·        The European Union is abolishing havaeas corpus, the supreme British legal safeguard which declares ‘no imprisonment without fair trial’, instituted under Article 39 of Magna Carta, 1215.

·        Under British law, a law enforcement officer or the public prosecutor must place evidence before a court within 24 hours of a citizen’s arrest, detailing the charges being brought against them.

 

·        Unpaid lay magistrates, representing the people and drawn from the people themselves, are being replaced after more than 600 years.   They currently hear over 90% of criminal cases.   The new EU-wide justice system will be enforced by inquisitorial courts (no injury).

 

·        British judges are already imposing European law upon British citizens.   Take the ‘metric martyr’ episode in 2001, when a market trader was convicted for selling a pound of bananas weighed  using British imperial measures (pounds and ounces).   British District Judge Morgan, in passing judgment upon the unfortunate grocer, stated that the British were now living under ‘new constitutional powers’.

 

·        Compare this with Edward Heath’s comment on the same treaty which gave Judge Morgan these powers:  “There is no question of Britain losing essential national sovereignty…”

 

·        British police will henceforth report to Brussels and be immune from prosecution.

 

·        The ECJ has already granted powers to Europol to intercept mail and e-mails with the excuse that it is fighting the drug menace, money laundering and the ‘War on Terror’.   The latter can naturally be extended to include actions against those who do not support the EU.   Under new legislation, actions pursued by those who disagree with the EU can be labelled seditious, treasonous and even blasphemous.

 

·        The ECJ is removing the ‘double jeopardy’ safeguard.   For centuries, British law has held that if a person is found not guilty of committing a crime, he cannot be tried again for the same offence.   Henceforth, under corpus juris law, the ECJ has given itself the ‘right’ to come back at an individual time and again with the same charge, using all its considerable ‘legal’ apparati, until it secures the required conviction.   Jack Straw, the British Home Secretary, has already given prosecutors the right to appeal against not-guilty verdicts handed down by jurors.

·        A British citizen will henceforth be liable to summary arrest and extradition to a foreign country without any evidence being presented to a court.   No prima facie evidence will be presented either to the court or its victim to support such charges.

 

·        In the EU’s apparent attempt to combat football hooliganism, the legal framework already exists to arrest a person even on suspicion that they may have committed, or might in the future commit a crime.

 

·        Under ECJ law, past offences committed by the accused will be raked up against him and used to justify why he committed the crime for which he is accused.   Under British law, this is illegal.   Such information on prior convictions is only made available to the court after the verdict, in order to secure a fair trial.

 

·        Under Article 8 of the Treaty of Amsterdam, members of the new federal ‘Europol’ are “immune from legal process of any kind for acts performed…in the exercise of their official functions.”   Thus, no Europol officer can be charged or brought to trial for false imprisonment, violence against a suspect, the destruction or seizure of private property, or harassment of any individual.

 

·        Europol has been given powers to operate anywhere within the Eurozone, including Britain, with complete impunity.   They have the power of summary arrest and extradition, in spite of current British laws, which specifically prohibit such actions.   Under the power of international treaty, British law is superseded by European law.

 

·        Ironically, or perhaps not, Europol’s centre of operations, housing 300-400 officers at present, is located in the old Gestapo headquarters building in the Hague.   Plans are well underway to expand this force to many thousands more, all to be armed and granted unfettered access to all regions of the EU.   Europol has been run by a former German police officer, Jorgen Storbeck, since its inception in 1994.

 

·        Britain’s representation of Europol is quartered with the National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS) at its HQ London.

·        Europol has been amassing computer records on hundreds of thousands of European citizens.   None of this information is ever made public.   Europol has the power, under EU law, to instruct British police authorities to investigate anyone in Britain the EU deems a danger to law and order.

 

EU Justice – No Checks and Balances

 

Any British government endorsing the above measures, as successive British administrations have done, is signing away freedoms guaranteed to the British people in perpetuity.   Such actions have paved the way for a once democratic Britain to be handed over to a new European-wide, potentially totalitarian regime run by Britain’s former enemies.   The Blair government has been instrumental, via Home Secretary Jack Straw, in accelerating this process, and then convincing the public it is all being done in their best interests.

 

An entity like the European Union, which has gone to great lengths to remove all public scrutiny of its affairs, all media reporting of its forum meetings and which has expeditiously granted lifetime immunity from prosecution to all its personnel and officers for their future actions, what can any government possibly want with such powers?  Can such an entity not reasonably be expected in the future to exercise this awesome might and do bad things to its citizens knowing it will be able to get away with it?   History repeatedly shows that these are the same powers all totalitarian regimes grant themselves before going to war with their own people and those of other countries.

 

This process may still be reversed by a unified and angry response from millions of Britons, clamouring for Britain to reject her EU membership and regain her independence, and compelling her government to take the appropriate, official action.   Time is running out as more statutory instruments are prepared in order to force Britain to remain in the EU.

 

Gone Fishing

 

By Greg Lance-Watkins  -   www.SilentMajority.co.uk

 

Two examples of the way  the European Union has dealt disastrously with Britain will illustrate the methods used to destroy countless British lives.   In this chapter, researcher Greg Lance-Watkins summaries the EU assault on the British fishing industry:

 

·        Unbeknown to the British electorate, Prime Minister Edward Heath made a deal with the EEC and gave away British sovereignty of its territorial fishing waters.   Up to that point ‘fishing’ had not been included in any treaties (it was not mentioned in the Treaty of Rome) but was later added at Maastricht (Articles 38-47).   EU officials were astounded when Heath unilaterally gave British fishing away with no preconditions.

 

·        British territorial waters are now ‘a shared European Union’ resource, and that means everything in them too.   This has given Brussels the right to allocate quotas to different member states who can now fish in British waters.

 

·        Due to the predictably harsh EU quotas imposed upon Britain’s fishing industry, millions of tons of fish, all dead but accidentally caught, are required (under EU law) to be thrown back into the sea.   EU law means that more fish are thrown back by British boats than are actually landed, for fear of incurring fines for over-fishing.   This is the result of the European Union’s conservation policy, which can cost lobster fishermen also, if they land a creature that is even one millimetre too small.   Fines of up to £50,000 can be levied against larger trawlers landing even one box over quota.

 

·        Thousands of boat boardings and inspections are carried out each year by EU representatives to ensure that the law on fishing is being upheld.

 

·        By 2004, the fishing fleets of other nations within the EU will be able to work right up to the shore, with Britain’s traditional 6- mile and 12-mile limits due to be abolished.   The quotas allocated by the Common Fisheries Policy of the EU mean that Spanish trawlers are allowed to fish cod in the Irish Sea while British trawlers are forbidden from putting to sea at all.

 

·        Although Maastricht was not signed until 1992 (in which Britain’s surrender of her fishing waters was formally acknowledged), foreign fishing fleets were using Britain’s waters for many years prior to that time.

 

·        Britain was allowed to fish only between 10% and 15% of her own stocks until 1st January 2003, when even this was cut back further.   The whole British fishing industry, on land and sea, has thus been effectively destroyed.   The quota system was brought into effect to accommodate the Spanish fishing fleet which had more boats than all the rest of the EU put together, but no good fishing grounds.

 

·        This law is being rigidly enforced with British waters, and is fast becoming a major pollution factor as well as helping to destroy remaining fishing stocks.   The previous EU arrangement gives Britain control up to six miles offshore and part control up to twelve miles.   This arrangement ended in 2002, and from 1st January 2003, EU boats have been able to fish right up to Britain’s shores.   (EU Regulation 3760/92).

 

·        The British government was forced to pay over £100 million in damages to Spain for preventing their fishermen from fishing British territorial waters.   The European Court of Justice ruled in 1991 that the British Merchant Shipping Act of 1988, passed by legally elected Members of the British Parliament to protect British fisheries, was illegal and contrary to EU law.

 

·        EU fisheries policy has been such a success that as of November 2002, British waters have become so depleted of cod fishing grounds in the North Sea, the Irish Sea and the north coast of Scotland.

 

·        Total number of British fishing livelihoods wrecked as a result of EU interference:  1 million.

 

 

 

Gone Farming

 

By Greg Lance-Watkins

 

How the European Union has destroyed British farming:   

 

·        Britain came under the EEC’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after Edward Heath signed the Treaty of Rome.   Under the CAP’s ‘Community Preference’, Britain must purchase any goods from EU countries first, and not from her former trading partners or Commonwealth.   Thus Britain is forced at inflated prices to purchase, for example, some of France’s huge surpluses, while French farmers are compensated through the Common Agricultural Policy, a part of which Britain funds, to grow food no-one wants.

·        The CAP’s agricultural interference and draconian regulation has thus deliberately despaired and wrecked the British farming industry.   Food prices have been drastically affected as the more expensive food Britain is compelled to buy from Europe, rather than from her cheaper Commonwealth sources, finds its way into the supermarket and corner store.   UK Government estimates in 1998 put the unnecessary and unjustified increase in British food prices at over £6.5 billion.

 

·        Britain keeps pouring billions of good money after bad by continuing to fund her share of the CAP, knowing full well that nothing but more British agricultural hardship will come from it.   The CAP represents European cronyism and protectionism of the worst order.

 

·        Today some British farmers are bing paid to do nothing with their own land.   Those who are still farming actively in Britain are compelled to conform to asinine EU regulation that has drastically driven up their operating costs.   Little wonder that British farming has taken such a beating in the past twenty years as the full terms of the CAP have begun to cut in.

 

·        Other colossal increases in costs affecting farming include EU inspections of meat facilities and withdrawal of previous subsidies to British farmers which are then given to farmers in France, Spain and Greece for farming tobacco.

 

·        The Common Agricultural Policy currently consumes over half the EU’s total income.   It is also responsible for a major part of the legislation flowing out of Europe.   Even by the end of 1996, 8,956 farming laws had already been passed.

 

·        By signing up to the CAP in 1972, the British effectively lost control of up to 90% of their land mass (the area currently related to agriculture), as well as handing over total control of all our farming practices to Brussels.   As with fishing, this has resulted in the downfall of the farming industry due to the following:

 

 

     1.   Over-production within the EU brought about by liberal subsidies.

 

2.        Britain being flooded with food imports, against which the British government finds itself powerless to protect the British farmers, due to EU rules.

 

3.        Prices (to farmers, not consumers) have tumbled and thousands of farmers are now facing ruin.   Again (because of EU regulations) there is nothing the British government can do in the way of financial help or a policy of protection.

 

4.        Milk quotas were brought in to level out production across the EU.   British farmers were more efficient and productive than their Continental counterparts and so had to be restricted.   Britain is now forced to import 20% of its milk needs from France, whilst British farmers pour milk down the drain and steadily go bankrupt.

 

5.        An over-abundance of EU legislation is stifling whole sections of the industry into extinction.   Pig, sheep and cattle farmers, as well as the industries that depend on them (packaging, slaughtering, etc.) are all being forced to close.  For example:

 

6.        Since 1990, slaughterhouses in Britain have diminished in number from 1,400 to 400 due to EU regulations on ‘cleanliness’.

 

7.        Farmers have been, and are continuing to be paid for doing nothing with their land (the policy of ‘set-aside’).    The richer the land, the more subsidy the farmer receives for not farming it.   This policy is the land-based version of the de-commissioning of Britain’s fishing fleets.

 

·        The deliberate run-down of the British farming industry is taking place and, because of it, British farmers can no longer feed the citizens of these islands.   This places the country at the mercy of the EU and foreign imports.

 

·        The following is an indication of government (EU) policy:  On 3rd May 2000, the Government Rural White Paper – 7th report of the Environment Transport and Regional Affairs Committee, Vol. 1 – contained the following opening paragraph:  “The role of rural England as the food provider for the nation is no longer an essential one.”

 

·        Beef:  In a typical move which openly flouted EU law, the French government maintained an illegal 3-year ban on British beef, even though Brussels had ruled that the product was safe.   The continued blockade was imposed by France’s previous, beleaguered socialist government in an attempt to appease the powerful French farming lobby and its consumers.   The illegal ban is thought to have cost British farmers a staggering £600 million in lost exports, not to mention tainting the reputation of British beef globally, resulting in 40 other countries currently maintaining blockades of their own against us.  Under EU law, France could have amassed a potential fine of up to £100 million for disobeying a direct order from the EU to lift her illegal ban.   France is unlikely to pay a cent however as she is one of the two tails that wags the EU dog.

 

The Great Deception Behind the Rebate Row

 

By Christopher Booker (January 2006)

 

Tony Blair was quite right to point out that, without the UK rebate, Britain would be the largest net contributor to the EU budget, paying 15 times more than France.   It was precisely this imbalance which prompted Margaret Thatcher to fight for the rebate.   It was never properly explained, however, why this ridiculous anomaly arose in the first place.

 

One of many remarkable episodes which Richard North and I were able to bring to light in our book,

The Great deception,

 just republished in a new updated edition, was the bizarre story behind the setting up of the Common Agricultural Policy in the 1960’s.  This was triggered off by the crisis facing France, through the runaway bill she was paying to subsidise French farmers for producing food nobody wanted.

 

President de Gaulle was terrified that this would bankrupt the French state, provoking social collapse.   The French therefore cunningly devised a CAP to get other countries to buy their surplus food and foot their subsidy bill.   The real reason why de Gaulle twice vetoed British entry was that it was vital first to get these arrangements agreed.  Otherwise Britain could have sabotaged a system deliberately designed to benefit France, from which Britain, because she imported, but with a smaller farming sector, she would also get fewer subsidies.

 

Only in 1969 did France get her way, at which point she needed Britain in and Edward Heath accepted the absurd arrangement.   Within a decade, with the CAP then taking up 90 per cent of the entire budget, Britain would become the biggest contributor.

Hence Mrs Thatcher’s fight for her rebate.   But even this was only a partial solution, because Britain’s farmers have continued to receive dramatically small subsidies than their competitors, contributing to the crisis which in recent years has brought much of British agriculture to its knees.

 

Thus are we still living with the problems created by that French stitch-up of 40 years ago, for reasons now almost lost in the mists of time.  For the full story refer to

The Great Deception:  Can The European Union Survive?, published by Continuum at £9.99.

 

The Sunday Telegraph, 4th December 2005

 

Blair Will Pay for his Betrayal in Brussels

 

When it comes to international negotiations, possession is nine tenths of the law.   A country may be under any amount of pressure, but as long as it is profiting from the status quo, it has nothing to fear from a breakdown.  It is instructive then to compare the behaviour of the EU at the Hong Kong trade talks with that of the United Kingdom at the Brussels summit.

 

In Hong Kong, the EU represented by its Trade Commissioner, Peter Mandelson, was determined not to open its markets to developing countries.  Its stance was wrong-headed and ethically indefensible.

 

Euro-protectionism drives up prices, erodes Europe’s competitiveness and causes much poverty in the Third World.   But despite the pleas of the southern hemisphere nations, and despite a general American initiative to cut tariffs, Brussels remained intransigent, secure in the knowledge that no deal would mean a default to the existing situation.

 

Britain’s position in Brussels was even stronger.  No mechanism existed to reduce the British rebate without Tony Blair’s agreement.  Here, a failure to reach terms would mean not a continuation of the status quo, but something even more attractive:  a drying up of the budget.

 

Britain – which, for almost the entire period of its membership, has been one of only two countries to make any net payment to the EU – would thus have been spared its annual tribute of £12 billion, and might have used these savings to (for example) give us all a two thirds cut in council tax.

 

Why, then, was Mr Blair so determined to find an accommodation?  Why did he climb down from his own position that there would be no reduction in the rebate without a commensurate dismantling of the CAP?   Because his Europeanism has never really been based on a computation of Britain’s national interest.

 

For him, being pro-EU is about being a modern internationalist, not about securing specific gains for his country.   This is, of course, the worst possible frame of mind in which to enter negotiations.

 

More to the point, though, Mr Blair has failed in his own terms.  A generous internationalist might indeed believe that Britain ought to give money to needier countries.   But the EU budget is not a mechanism for doing so.  Its largest per capita beneficiary is Luxembourg.  By failing to secure CAP reform, Mr Blair has, in fact, done immense damage to the world’s truly deserving states.

 

Make no mistake:  the sums of money involved are immense - £7 billion, the amount Mr Blair has handed away, is roughly the entire police budget for England and Wales.  At the last election, Mr Blair claimed Tory plans for a £4 billion tax reduction would mean savage cuts in public services.   Never again will he be able to level such an accusation.

 

From now on, every time they are asked where they would find the money for tax cuts, the Tories can reasonably reply:  from Brussels.  Mr Blair has betrayed his word and his electorate.   His budget surrender will be hung, albatross-like, around his neck and invoked every time he raises taxes. 

 

The Daily Telegraph, 19th December 2005

 

Vitamins

 

There is a mass-migration of income from the medicine and pharmaceutical industries into the huge diversity of companies comprising what is known as the ‘alternative health industry’ has not gone unnoticed by the powers-that-be.   Today, British and Continental citizens are finding that new legislation from Brussels is seeking either to ban or strictly limit the availability of a wide range of traditional remedies and supplements that have been used by the public for decades, and in some cases centuries, for their well-being.  Something sinister called Codex Alimentarius is casting its Big Brother shadow across the Eurozone.   Americans and other world populations are looking on with apprehension as they know they are next!

 

The EU Supplements Directives

 

There is a European move to regulate the alternative health industry’s supplements.  

 

On 12th March 2002, the European Parliament voted and passed regulations which limit the public availability and upper intakes of hundreds of nutrients to ridiculously low levels – in certain cases,  1/50th            or  even less of what many nutritional doctors recommend as therapeutic doses.

 

Like Germany and France, many are now facing the prospect of not just severe censure in the amounts of these nutrients they can take, but what they can buy at all.  For, hidden within the Trojan Horse ‘harmonisation’ proposals used to justify entering the launch codes against the alternative health industry, the realisation is dawning that anything not on the EU positive list of ‘accepted’ supplements is now in for an outright ban.   Manufacturers who wished to field anything ‘new’ will be required to spend millions proving benefit through exhaustive ‘drug testing’ – a state of affairs guaranteed to bankrupt even the most stalwart of the green corporations.

 

For 13 years, European pharmaceutical conglomerates have been contemplating a standardised market for vitamin, mineral and herbal supplements.   Various attempts to harmonise the industry have met with a huge and sustained opposition, not least from the UK and its vitamin consumers.   In January 2000, the Brussels Commission, during one of those rare, brief periods in which it was not being found guilty of fraud and accounting corruption, table a White Paper on Food Safety.  A later document, 500PC0222 (what monster invents that kind of archiving system?), concluded that a wide disparity existed on alternative medicine dosages, and proposed legislation to correct the imbalance.   In France and Germany, for instance, no products containing more than one times the Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) may be sold without a drug licence.

 

And this is a problem.  Vitamin C’s RDA is 40-60mg.  Yet the therapeutic dosage of C begins at 500mg and goes up beyond 10,000mg.  So if you wish to treat yourself with mega doses of C complex for your cancer, best visit B & Q and buy up a wheelbarrow in readiness to haul all those expensive, tiny vitamin pills back to base-camp.

 

Opposition is to No Avail

 

Most UK Members of the Euro Parliament (MEPs) voted against the food supplements and herbal initiatives, which nevertheless passed.   In spite of some 400 million pieces of mail, e-mails, faxes and sky writings thrown at Brussels vociferously protesting this attack on human rights, along with the predictable media black-out, the legislation was approved with no House debate at the usual tornado velocity, with 383 MEPs in favour and 139 against.  Considerable resources had been expended by the pharmaceutical industry to lobby members for their vote.  The public’s outrage was ignored.

 

Where are we Now?

 

There is an intervening period currently occurring which is designed to allow member states to pass laws aligning themselves with the new directives, which also strictly limit the availability of herbal medicines.   Products formulated with ingredients not on the EU’s parsimonious list of approved substances will not comply with the directives and will be banned after 1st June 2005.   Upper safe limits have been arbitrarily allocated to such a conservative list of nutrients, over which supplement dosage will be regulated, that the vast majority of other, more specialised nutrients not included on the list will be effectively cleared from the shelves of most UK, Dutch and Irish health stores, along with even the common stuff, such as vitamins C and B6, which are always sold in potencies exceeding the EU mandate.

 

Unless a concerted effort is made en masse by the affronted citizenry to pull Britain out of the European Union, the Euro juggernaut will have its way again.   A few short years from now, the Darth Vader vitamin police will screech up outside your vitamin shack and clear your shelves of the designated ‘contraband’ nutrients.  And there won’t be a thing you will be able to do about it.

 

Strategies

 

Many alternative health organisations are blanching at the thought of losing significant revenues over this new legislation to the drug industry and their huge retail conglomerates, and have formed alliances to ‘fight the Food  Supplements Directive’.  However, they do so in woeful ignorance of the simple fat that, with the European Union, they are no longer operating on a democratic, accountable field.   Their mistake, and this is the crucial point being missed, is that they are confusing Brussels with people who actually care about what the public think.

 

Brussels do not care about your supplements!   Brussels are closing loopholes, working to standardise everything across Europe, and responding to corporate lobbying and plain paper envelopes from the drug industry in their usual way, all the while ruling their new fiefdom from behind closed doors.  The public are not considered.

 

Brussels do not recognise that you even have a right to complain.   This is the new system taking over Europe as well as Britain.  There is nothing you can do about any of this through what you perceive as traditional parliamentary channels.   They simply don’t exist any more.   Your politicians have been too cowardly to tell you that this is now the state of affairs governing Britain.

 

Uneasy Bedfellows – The Great Immigration Disaster

 

Today, Britain is being successfully invaded for the third time in its 1,000 year history.   The first time, it was William of Normandy who invaded our southern shores and ended up running the country after King Harold was struck in the eye with a French arrow at the ill-fated Battle of Hastings in 1066.  The second occasion was when the Americans invaded us in a friendly way prior to the Allies launching Operation Overlord (D-Day) against the Nazis on 6th June 1944.

 

These days, Britain is being invaded with ‘asylum seekers’, most of which are not political refugees fleeing tyranny in their own countries at all, but economic migrants seeking to better their lives by choosing a new country in which to live.  And guess which is their first country of choice?  Not Germany, not France, nor Italy or Greece but Britain!

 

The United states has the Mexican immigrant problem in her south west corner.  Australians are trying to hold the Indonesians at bay to the north.  New Zealanders have the Pacific Islanders and citizens of other south-east Asian nations trying to get in.   This is economic migration.

 

Into this mix we stir the concerted plan by global socialism striving for its New World Order to homogenise national populations in order to dilute the hated national identity and thus marginalise the appeal of the nation state.   Mass, unchecked immigration is the perfect weapon to accomplish this.   The nation, like the family, is believed by the socialist today to be the root cause of all wars and woes respectively, which is why socialism is always working tirelessly to kill off both.   Actually, while nationalism has certainly been one of the reasons war has broken out in the past, it is not the main reason.   The chief motivation that triggers a country to go to war is actually the belief that it can get away with it.

 

Nations provide a check and balance system against government abuse and tyranny.  Truly democratic nations are the largest social unit that can still be directly controlled by the majority of their inhabitants.   When one nation gets too big for its boots, others can band together and sort out the renegade country.   Refugees fleeing the tyranny can also hope to find sanctuary in another land.   Nazi Germany and Japan were brought to account during the last war by this check and balance system, although the cost was ugly and extremely high.  A world containing a democracy of independent nations still provides for this control system to operate effectively if someone gets out of line.

 

But set up a global government structure not answerable to its peoples, or even a continental federation like the EU, place all the power into the hands of a few, unelected, unaccountable committees, and the check and balance system is lost.   One of course lives in the hope that such a mega-government will be benevolent.   But it it isn’t?  What can you do about it now?  Where will you flee?   Who will bring the tyranny to account?

 

Our neighbours on the mainland have suffered enough at the hands of their extremists and ideologists.   No countries deserve peace and a chance to rid themselves of their power-hungry political cliques more than France, Austria, Germany and Italy.   It is for this reason that the European Union poses the greatest danger to European and hence world peace, not just because it is run by a group of fifth-rate, financially corrupt nest-featherers, but because there is no accountability to the public.   This is especially true with Britain, where the safety net has been removed just as we are about to be persuaded to take our own one-way, high-wire walk into European integration.   The European Union has already shown itself capable of:

 

·        Corruption on a Herculean scale.

·        Removing its citizens’ human rights if it so chooses.

·        Ignoring mass protests of its citizens over the measures it introduces.

·        Imprisoning people for periods without fair trial.

·        Equipping the state with all the instruments of repression.

·        Rendering immunity from prosecution to all its officials.

 

Open Door

 

From 1950 to 1990, the total population of Caribbean and Asian immigrants in Britain went from around 80,000 to a little over 3 million, mostly concentrated in the south-east of the country and the major cities.  Since the early 1990’s, the immigrant population, comprising both legal entrants and those sneaking in, has exploded exponentially.  Figures released by the Home Office show that just under 30,000 illegal immigrants claimed asylum in a three-month period in the summer of 2002.  Nine out of ten had their cases thrown out, yet only 3,565 were subsequently deported.

 

The mass, unchecked immigration sanctioned by the present and past British governments has deeply offended the British.  Needless to say, the immigration issue is hardly about ‘racism’, ‘xenophobia’, or ‘populism’, except when these labels justifiably apply to politically correct liberalists who seek to stifle the honest outrage of the majority.  Nobody is saying that there shouldn’t be any immigrants.  The reason the British are so upset is because they were simply never asked who they wanted to come to live with them….and how many.

 

Immigration is ever the hot issue it always was.  Even to discuss the problem is to invite a torrent of hate-filled abuse and cries of ‘racist!’ and ‘Nazi!’ from the socialist nation-wreckers.  This of course is their intention:  to keep free speech suppressed, all the while allowing their damaging, dangerous policies to proceed unimpugned.  One such shameful issue has been the catastrophic failure of our political class to admit the disaster of Britain’s immigration policy.

 

·        According to government sources, genuine asylum seekers fleeing political persecution make up a mere 3% of those attempting to get into Britain.  The vast majority are illegal economic immigrants.  People are attempting to enter Britain in such numbers because they see the real chance of a prosperous future for themselves here.

 

·        The government mechanism for curbing immigration and ensuring only valid cases are passed appears to have completely broken down.  Very few asylum seekers whose applications have been turned down at the time of writing are actually being deported.  Many are either just released into the community or disappear into British society.

·        British taxpayers are having to foot the expense of providing camps, healthcare, social security, education and housing for tens of thousands of economic migrants every month!

 

·        Under new government guidelines, four-star hotels and holiday camps are being set aside to house illegal immigrants.

 

·        Asylum seekers have also been benefiting from hand-outs from the politically correct National Lottery Community Fund.  In 2001, illegal immigrants received a staggering £20 million to the outrage of other groups, such as the Victims of Crime Trust, who were passed over.  Clive Elliott of the VCT called for a boycott of the Lottery, remonstrating:  “I accuse the Community Fund of being biased and prejudiced and even exhibiting institutionalised racism when choosing its priorities.”

 

·        Today, one in 20 of London’s population is either an ‘asylum seeker’ or a refugee.

 

·        Asylum applications can involve long and expensive legal processes, again paid for by the British taxpayer.

 

·        Unchecked illegal immigration provides easy opportunity for terrorists to enter Britain undetected.  One refugee leader, Dr Mohammed Sekkoum, believes that at least 100 Algerians who are known terrorists in their own country have entered and are living secretly in Britain.

 

·        Communities in south-eastern England have found themselves literally overrun by illegal immigrants.

 

·        It appears that Britain has lost control of her own borders.

 

·        The white population of Britain is reproducing itself far more slowly than the immigrant populations, with the inevitable effect of changing the racial mix of the country.

 

·        Illegal immigration allows a nation state’s identify to be diluted as other cultures homogenise with the domestic population.

 

·        Illegal immigration provides more justification for EU state interference and control.

·        Publicising illegal immigration will more likely cause the acceptance by the public of EU security measures, such as the introduction of a continent-wide ID card, which the citizenry normally would not tolerate.  Will Europe once again hear:  “Your papers, please”?

 

·        Cultural diversity has historically caused deep-seated and long-term problems with stability and control, as we have seen with Northern Ireland, Africa, Yugoslavia and Britain and many other examples throughout history.  Yet ‘multiculturalism’ still remains the weapon of choice for EU socialists for four main reasons:

 

1.        It wrecks a nation’s national identity and customs;

 

2.        It improves socialism’s standing with the immigrants who will henceforth vote for their benefactors;

 

3.        It creates problems which can only be solved with the state taking on more powers, e.g. the issuance of  ID cards and other security measures;

 

4.        No indigenous citizen is able to complain about the effects of this ‘unchecked’ immigration for fear of being labelled a ‘racist’.

 

·        In ancient times, when the Assyrian empire invaded a nation, it would     deport the indigenous population and settle foreign peoples into the conquered land, such as with the Samaritans into northern Israel.   This sweeping measure prevented the germination of nationalist resistance movements among the conquered race.

·        In 1998, the EU set up a European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia in Vienna.   Neither ‘crime’ was defined, leaving each open to wide interpretation, one of the EU’s favourite tactics.

 

·        While unacceptable ‘racist’ views are deplored by most, a free society must allow freedom of speech, however objectionable.  Otherwise, who determines what is acceptable to think about and say, and what isn’t?  The EU?

 

Are the British Racist?

 

A cataclysmic weapon has been deployed against Britain in the form of mass, unchecked immigration, coupled with the drafting of new legislation which will actually make it illegal to voice your opposition to EU policies of the day.

 

But are the British who speak up about such matters ‘racist’ or ‘xenophobic’, or are they not justified  in feeling apprehensive and nervous about what is going on around them?  The future may yet see Islamic fundamentalism take to the streets in Britain to propagate its own violence, since radical Islam, by its own admission, refuses to assimilate into Britain’s new secular society, let alone the previous Christian one.  This may already have begun to happen.

 

Logging on to You

 

After the forthcoming ‘enlargement’ of the EU in May 2004, the aim is eventually to have all 450 million inhabitants registered on the central Europol database with an ‘entitlement’ (read ‘identity’) card, fingerprints, DNA-typing and dozens of fields of information on political and sexual preferences, arrest records, tax data, religious beliefs and other demographic denominators.  Misbehaviour by any individual will incur a withdrawal of ‘entitlements’ (privileges granted by the state) and the full machinery of the state’s oppressive law enforcement apparatus being arrayed against them.

 

Another problem is that terrorists can gain access to Britain relatively easily in order to wreak havoc on soft targets, as we almost saw with the ricin episode in North London.  Such terrorist events, while grotesque and macabre to the public, in fact greatly serve the ends of the socialist architects.  Another high-profile terrorism shooting, for instance, provokes the usual round of gun-control legislation, further disarming law-abiding citizens, while at the same time ensuring that the police become more heavily armed and the serious weaponry is left in the hands of hardened criminals and troublemakers.

 

Old Soviet

 

Anatoly Golytsin, a Kremlin staffer, defected from the USSR in 1984 and published his book, New Lies for Old.   In it, Golytsin described how, a few years into the future, a series of political events would occur in Russia which would lead the world to believe that Communism had collapsed.  This in fact happened with the breaking up of the Soviet Union in 1991.  The West was indeed lulled to sleep, according to Golytsin, trusting that the Cold War was over.  Meanwhile, was a more powerful and better organised regime forming beneath Western nations in Europe after decades of careful planning and execution?

 

The political left in Britain endorses any move that contributes towards the break-up of the state and its acceleration into their utopia of either a pan-European super state or global federation.  Reckless immigration, along the lines we are seeing today, appears to be deliberately encourage, through inaction, by the government of the day, even as it was by previous administrations, regardless of party politics.

 

Britain – a Cultural War-Zone

    

The woman in the street and the man on the Clapham omnibus, born during the 1920’s into a Britain of deference, respect and long-established British values, have both received a rude awakening.  The Britain they once admired and loved has ceased to exist.

 

There was once a Britain where citizens regarded themselves as having the highest ideals of decency and justice.  But the character of today’s Britons, occupying the same place on the globe as their empirical predecessors, would be as alien to those old adversaries Gladstone and Disraeli as the dark side of the moon.

 

To the old soldiers, sailors and airmen of World War II, the country they loved and fought for is unrecognisable to them today, and so are the inhabitants.  Forbidden by law to say anything about what is going on around them, they choke on the ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘cultural diversity’ gags that have been stuffed in their mouths.  Bitter resentment and anger seethe in their hearts that no one asked them whether they wanted all the changes the socialists forced upon them anyway.  They came from an era when everyone seemed to care.  Today, how shocked they are to find that it is they are viewed as the enemies of ‘tolerance’ and ‘progress’.

 

While millions of the silent majority resent what has happened and seek a lawful, political solution from one of their major political parties, not one speaks for them.  The Big Three, New Labour, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, are all pushing for the death of Britain.  New Labour waved the Union Jack at the Queen’s Jubilee, while chortling inwardly at its coming demise.  The soft and vacillating Conservative right rubberstamps a multiculturalism it secretly hates, grinning sheepishly up at the British Tower of Babel which hideously offends it, just to appear relevant with the trendy modernizers of Blair’s Third Way’.

 

Are the British institutionally racist?  Well if we are, you’d be hard put to explain why British army and civilian personnel went native in India.  Africa and a hundred places in between during the empire years, even as they do today.   Millions of Brits over the centuries have married foreign spouses, incorporated foreign cuisine and adopted foreign ways and brought all those great foreign words into our tremendously versatile language. 

 

Today the huge contributions the British have made to the world are still venerated in South Africa, India, Pakistan, Australia, Canada, America, New Zealand and a hundred other countries.  Certainly not much of an indication that the British culture is at war with the natives.  In fact, name another empire that has ever withdrawn from its power and still enjoys the kind of relationship we do with most of our former colonies today?

 

So Britain is to get the destiny she deserves.  Lenin is to have his day.  The state is God.  Multiculturalism and political correctness became the new faith and morality for Britain round about the time the nation realised it had lost God in the mud somewhere between the guilt of Passchendaele and the shame of the Anglican Lambeth Conferences.

 More!

 

*  *  *

                                        ---------------

-------

 

['FORTUNATELY ,WE ARE NOW LEAVING THE  CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC GODLESS BEAST IN BRUSSELS-AND ABOUT TIME TOO! WE AS MANY OTHERS VOTED NO! IN 1975  AND HAVE CONTINUED EACH DAY TO FIGHT THE BATTLE FOR ENGLAND'S FREEDOM EVER SINCE.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 AUGUST-2017

 

H.F.1266-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

 

 

A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF

ENGLAND

 AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
 

Asian grooming gangs are Muslim says Trevor Phillips | Daily Mail .August 12-2017...

Asian-grooming-gangs-treated-race-hate-crimes.html
Former race tsar Trevor Phillips says it's time to admit most sex grooming gangs
are Muslim amid calls for abusers to be treated ... Rudd said political correctness
must not put people off reporting Asian sex gangs to the police.

*

Newcastle Asian sex gang plied girls with drink and drugs - Daily Mail

Police-paid-child-rapist-10k-spy-sex-parties.html
2 days ago ... Shocking details of a large-scale Asian sex gang who spent four years plying ...
drugs at 'sex parties' in Newcastle can be revealed for the first time today. ...
raped by men as if they were in a 'relay race' at one of the 'parties'; A chief ...
Saiful Islam, 35, of Newcastle, was jailed for 10 years in January 2016 for ...

*

MULTICULTURALISM IS NO LONGER RIGHT FOR BRITAIN-says CRE Head Trevor Phillips

[Daily Mail 0n Monday the 12th April 2004.]

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT-NOT MULTICULTURAL

*

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

*

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1280.BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER.

 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
(Jeff )RENCE.COM  TRUTHCONTROL.COM/  

WHATDOESIT MEAN.COM

 

 

HUMANS ARE FREE

CLIMATE CHANGE A HOAX-TRUMP KNOWS IT-NOW YOU KNOW IT!

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

TO RETURN TO:

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017

 

Soul of England