DID YOU KNOW?

No 1

A  prominent British eurosceptic once told the writer (Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

'That expansion of the European Union was desirable in principle, since the consequence would be that its power and effectiveness would be diluted. Like almost everything connected to the European Union, this weird logic is upside down and back -to-front.  Diluting the voting power of EU member countries through expansion, diminishes the residual 'power' of the countries further.'

(This was written in 1999, reprinted 2001)

www.worldreports.org

As we all know in August 2008 the EU COLLECTIVE is now asking a number of member states to give up their voting rights and instead be represented by another from a bloc of a similar background. e.g. Ireland to be represented by the United Kingdom.  So in the case of the EU you don't have to wait too long for all those frequent reassurances to be demolished.

In December 2008 the EU Commission has stated that it wishes to come to some arrangement with the Irish people in order to satisfy their demands in order that the LISBON TREATY can be ratified by the Irish voters before the deadline in December 2009.

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

AUGUST-2008

 

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 2

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

The Treaty of Rome was never actually signed by the six founding 'Member States' of the European Community, and could therefore be technically invalid, or even invalid in fact.

Dr Hallstein was one of the 'signatories', with Dr Adenauer, of the Treaty of Rome establishing the European Communities, 'signed' on 25th March 1957.

A young Italian Chancery aide called Giulio Andreotti ( later Italy's Prime Minister, subsequently embroiled in scandal like his fellow former Italian Prime Minister, the President of t6he European Commission, Romano Prodi) had contrived to procure the signatures  of the Plenipotentiaries on

blank sheets of paper

 because the German, Dutch and Italian translations of the French original were not yet available, and the delegates had to leave for their respective capitals. .  .

The official text of the Treaty of Rome states, at the end: 'In witness whereof, the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed this Treaty: Done at Rome this twenty-fifth day of March in the year of one thousand nine hundred and fifty- seven:

 

P. H. SPAAK (the Belgian Communist-Ed.) ADENAUER, PINEAU , ANTONIO SEGNI.BECH, J.LUNS, J. CH SNOY ET D'OPPUERS, HALLSTEIN, M . FAURE, GAETANO MARTINO, LAMBERT SCHAUS, J.LINTHORST HOMAN'.

*

[More background information will be available in the near future or for your copy contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

AUGUST-2008

 

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 3

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

On 23rd March 2000, Gorbachev, who was briefly visiting London conformed amid cynical laughter that the European Union is

'the new European Soviet'

[see The Daily Telegraph, Peterborough column, 24th March 2000]. With this single revealing remark, Gorbachev has himself confirmed this book's central thesis - and also that, while engaged in presiding over the dismantling of the Stalinist model of control of the Soviet Bloc, he was nevertheless also furthering the realisation of Stalin's blueprint, set out in a treatise published in 1942:

'Divide the world into regional groups as a transitional stage of  world government.  Populations will more readily abandon their national loyalties to a vague regional loyalty than they will for a world authority.  Later, the regions can be brought together all the way into a single world dictatorship.'

*

[More background information will be available in the near future or for your copy contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

AUGUST-2008

 

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 4

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

According to The Sunday Times [16th December 2001], reporting from the EU Summit meeting held in Laeken, Belgium, in December 2001, one very senior member of the British delegation told UK reporters:

'Many  of these people are buffoons. We view them with a mixture of horror and amazement.'

Another British delegate described the far-Left Belgium Foreign Minister Louis Michel, as

'a complete idiot'

These UK officials were merely expressing views which have evidently been widely held by political circles in London for many years.

WHY, THEN,

does Britain continue to squander official time and resources on its disastrous membership of this confused corrupt yet ideologically offensive, political collective?

By 1996, it had been shown that the net cost of membership to Britain was in the order of

£300 BILLION

enough to build modern hospitals in every large town in the world.

 

*

[More background information will be available in the near future or for your copy contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

AUGUST-2008

 

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 5

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

EUROPEAN BILATERAL TREATIES DRAFTED BY THE GRU -SOVIET INTELLIGENCE.

When the author Christopher Story interviewed Lady Thatcher in the House of Commons in July 1991, she had no knowledge of the bilateral treaties which President Gorbachev had been signing with key targeted Western countries, and was astonished at the information about these treaties shown to her, even though all the information obtained at the meeting had been extracted from reports published by the BBC Monitoring Service.  She would have been even more astonished if the Author had then been in a position to inform her, what he was later able to establish -that the bilateral treaties were all drafted by the Soviet authorities, with significant input by Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU).

This fact emerged first in a letter dated 28th October 1991 from John McGregor, then Leader of the House of Commons, to Michael Spicer MP, in which Mr McGregor wrote:

'You asked me for details of treaty overtures to the British Government from the Soviet Union.  In September 1990, the Soviet Union proposed a bilateral document...'

Much later, when it became known that the British-Russian bilateral treaty would be signed by President Yeltsin and the British Prime Minister, John Major, on 9th November 1993, the author telephoned the News Department of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and phoned the News Department of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and asked them to confirm that the new treaty had originated in Moscow.

The Foreign Office spokesman, who commented gratuitously that 'you seem to be quite well informed', duly conceded that this was indeed the case...

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

AUGUST-2008

 

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 6

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT

 

At 5.pm on 27th July 1996, a report on U.S.National Public Radio asserted that General Aleksandr Lebed had commented as follows on the destruction of TWA Flight 800 which occurred ten days earlier, shortly after the plane had taken off from Kennedy Airport en route to Paris: 'This bombing shows that international terror is a problem requiring broader coordination in future events'

, the unmistakable implication being that 'future events', such as those of 11th September 2001 when the World trade Centre in New York City and the Pentagon were attacked by hijacked commercial ,aircraft were already being planned certainly, the 'coordination' between Russia and the West against the 'global threat' of international terrorism which Lebed pressed for in 1996, quickly fell into place after these events

Thus the 'need' for a 'common global justice system', an essential component of the intended global dictatorship, is being provoked by the World Revolution, which is itself responsible under the overall supervision of Soviet Military Intelligence, for the 'international terrorism' provocation.  This dimension of World Revolution is replicated by the EU's so-called 'Third Pillar', which imposes a common system of policing and 'justice' across the

EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE

 in the form of a 'single European justice space' and an executive federal police force (Europol) taking orders from a Single European Public Prosecutor -the intended consequences being, in Britain's case, the supplanting of the Common Law, habeas corpus  (the bedrock of British freedom) and hence the entire basis of British legality.

In pursuance of the revolutionary objective, late in 2001, the Fabian Blair Government 'surreptitiously' incorporated part of the EU's Leninist 'Third Pillar' into UK law under cover  of its anti-terrorist legislation, in the face of a justified uproar in the House of Lords, where it was at once pointed out that the inclusion of these provisions had nothing to do with

INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM MEASURES.

One consequence  of this will have been the introduction of powers enabling a resident of, say Greece , to apply to a magistrate for a

EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT

to  have someone in Britain arrested on one or more of the 32 counts listed in the relevant Euro-legislation -one of which includes a crime of 'xenophobia' which is  not recognised at all in English law.  In response , the national police will be bound  to arrest the individual concerned and have him deported to Greece to face indefinite imprisonment, without the habeas corpus safeguard.

THE BRITISH COURTS would have NO JURISDICTION OVER THE CASE.

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

AUGUST-2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 7

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

LONG TRADITION OF GERMAN EAST-WEST DIALECTICS

The political and ideological notion that Germany should be aligned with the East against the West is an old and deeply-rooted tradition of German foreign policy.   It featured prominently in the diplomatic scheming of Frederick the Great 250+years ago and it dominated the policies of the Iron Chancellor, Bismarck, during the second half of the 19th century.   It was implicit in the plans for the 'Kaiser's Europe' and it became central to the plans hatched by the Weimar Republic's policymakers.   Next it was Hitler's 'great solution' at the opening of the

SECOND WORLD WAR.

Thereafter as has been seen, it was integrated into Pan German planning for the future....

[Many must be aware of the infamous treaty that Hitler signed in 1939 with Russia early in the Second World War in order to give the Germans a clear field to conquer without interference from Russia.]

Throughout the 250+years during which the tendency of the Germans to pursue a policy of orientation towards Russia grew, the parallel tendency is observed of ambivalence towards Germany's relations with the West. At times, the relationship has been so strained, as after the First World War, that little pretence of any interest in Western orientation of policy was observed.  At other times, Germany appeared to 'warm' to the West -but always, in part, to mask the political elite's fundamental orientation to the East. This de facto 'dialectical' behaviour has become so ingrained that it is second nature to the heirs of the Pan Germans, whom the other Western powers ought to trust

NO MORE THAN THEY TRUST THE RUSSIANS.

 

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

as well

This provides the twisted rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he continued to serve as President.

Dr Herzog's subversive remarks have special resonance for Britain, where

QUEEN ELIZABETH II

 is the

 SOVEREIGN AND CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD

of the

UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

She is the custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her father,  This was confirmed initially when the

QUEEN took the OATH of ACCESSION

and was finally solemnised at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognised and universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful

 SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH PEOPLE

In November 2000 -after a correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair; to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness jay; and to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders and dignitaries -asking:

Is Her Majesty the Queen Sovereign?

HE RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL

or else a non-committal weak, diversionary reply.

Mr Blair being unable to answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry  to the Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark of the

BLAIR GOVERNMENT

has been its Ministers' arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary questions.  Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point on occasion, of'

' standing the Queen up'

by failing to turn up on time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.

 

WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.

 

[Further details to follow]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

as well

This provides the twisted rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he continued to serve as President.

Dr Herzog's subversive remarks have special resonance for Britain, where

QUEEN ELIZABETH II

 is the

 SOVEREIGN AND CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD

of the

UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

She is the custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her father,  This was confirmed initially when the

QUEEN took the OATH of ACCESSION

and was finally solemnised at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognised and universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful

 SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH PEOPLE

In November 2000 -after a correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair; to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness jay; and to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders and dignitaries -asking:

Is Her Majesty the Queen Sovereign?

HE RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL

or else a non-committal weak, diversionary reply.

Mr Blair being unable to answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry  to the Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark of the

BLAIR GOVERNMENT

has been its Ministers' arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary questions.  Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point on occasion, of'

' standing the Queen up'

by failing to turn up on time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.

[Further details to follow]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 11

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

THE [NAZI] GENERAL PLAN-1945

Fragments of captured Nazi documents.

 

As mentioned earlier, several revealing Nazi documents, drawn up in the closing days of the

THIRD REICH,

were captured by the Allies in June 1945, along with the files of the short-lived post-Hitler Doenitz Government based in Flensburg.  The documents in question were jointly initialled by

Grand Admiral Doenitz and Field Marshall Keitel.

One paper, entitled

'THE GERMAN FREEDOM MOVEMENT'

gave details of the establishment amid Germany's ruins of a 'new' political movement designed to preserve German racial principles.  Another document, also referred to earlier was entitled

'The Overcoming of the Catastrophe'

in which the German High Command emphasised the 'self-evident' advantages of a

 RUSSO-GERMAN ALLIANCE AGAINST THE WEST

 A third document sketched out a NEW EUROPEAN ORDER

('Europaische Friedensordnung')

which showed a most remarkable resemblance to Dr Adenauer's proposals for a UNITED EUROPE, as well as to the structure of the Maastricht Treaty. This superfluous Nazi document ,which was grandly entitled 'The European Peace-Order', summarised Germany's objectives as follows:

[We hope those misguided politicians from 1972 will acquaint themselves of the following -ex Prime Ministers particularly :]

1   Liberation of the German people from suppression and occupation 

2   Repatriation of the expellees

3   An integrated German racial community

4   Elimination of all arbitrary acts of the enemy

 

5   European union on a federalistic basis.

6   The right to racial autonomy

 

7   European Common-weal ('Gemmeinnutz')

A European Court of arbitration

 

9   A community of related peoples with the aim of creating a Germanic Reich

 

10   A commonwealth linking Germany and Bohemia and Moravia.

 

11   Guaranteed protection of racial groups ('Volksgruppenrecht')

12.   Economic integration of Europe.

*

[Possibly our own Conservative MEP Philip Bushill-Matthews the Pro-EU MEP for the West Midlands will explain to us his naivety in thinking he can change what was decided on in 1945 over 60 years ago.  You ask who rules Britannia? Of course you know it is BRUSSELS through the Franco-German and Russian Bloc elite. ]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 12

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

[GEORGIA REVISITED]

PSYCHOTIC DRUGS AND EUROPEAN COLLECTIVISM

That prospect should cause no surprise after , the Soviet push for 'collective security' has been gathering momentum against the background of heightened and televised violence in the

CAUCASUS

and elsewhere [as in 2008]

-as local falsely 'independent regimes such as the Georgian repression apparatus, have gone about their grisly tasks of suppressing recalcitrant minorities, with or without overt Russian, Ukrainian and other 'post'-Soviet military assistance -leaving Russia's hands 'clean', for international public consumption purposes (except in the no-go region around Chechnya, from which the West is largely barred).

Instead of the Soviet militia supervising repression -as in Tbilisi in April 1990 for instance, when 19 demonstrators (mainly young women) were killed by poison gas and sharpened trenching shovels -it has been the uniformly Stalinist regimes controlling the 'independent' states of the 'ex-USSR which have mainly been doing Moscow's repressive dirty work, providing at the same time, the rationale for 'collective security' arrangements which Moscow insists, to a chorus of

WESTERN AGREEMENT

are so desperately necessary given the

 'dangerous new world in which we live'

Where Moscow's dirty and bloody hand has been exposed as in Chechnya, the West has quickly sought to draw a veil over the atrocities concerned -enabling Tony Blair and Gerhard Schroeder for instance to fraternise with the intelligence officer in charge in the Kremlin, Vladimir Putin, with apparent general and electoral impunity: the British Prime Minister  has played snooker with Putin, on at least one of his visits to Russia, and Blair's invitation for President Putin and his family to visit his official country residence for two days at Christmas 2001.

 

TO BE CONTINUED

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 13

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

German Navy was  deployed internationally in 2002, for the first time since the Second World War.

As the Russian apparatchik, Maksimychev, added in his article.'...by the year 2000, one may expect the foreign policy of the Federal Republic of Germany to grow in forcefulness and to more energetically advance specifically German goals in Europe

As if to provide timely substance to this dialectic, the German Navy was  deployed internationally in 2002, for the first time since the Second World War. On 25th January 2002, the BBC's 24-hour News Service [the Brussels Broadcasting Service] showed pictures of a state-of-the-art-German destroyer deployed off Djibouti in connection [wait for it!] with

'the war against terrorism'

and under overall American command.  One  of these three such German ships sent to the area, it flew NOT, as might be expected the

European Union's ubiquitous blue flag with 12 yellow stars,

BUT

rather the German flag which displays a

BLACK IRON CROSS

on a white background.

In thus removing the 'mask of federalism' which the

NAZI INTERNATIONAL-PAN-GERMAN 'LINE'

has been exploiting in furtherance of the final fulfilment of German geopolitical ambitions, the Germans also, wittingly or unwittingly, provided their collaborator-rivals, the Russian Leninists, with the kind of ammunition that will have been welcomed in Moscow to reinforce the Leninist strategists' push for collective security.

...Maksimychev wrote, 'whose historical mission will become all-European construction and the completion of continental integration from which not one European will be excluded'

[=TOTAL FEDERALISATION/COLLECTIVISM].

The Leninist World Revolution needs Germany to push the reluctant Europeans into Lenin's 'universal European federation' on its behalf'.

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 14

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

PSYCHOLOGICAL PRESSURES AND THE EUROPEAN COLLECTIVE

There is in fact no excuse for this generalised Western failure to detect the existence of the continuing Bolshevik geopolitical strategy sine as reiterated throughout this analysis, the Leninists are far from bashful about revealing their strategic intensions. As Yelena Bonner, the wife of the long-standing (late) agent of influence, Andrei. has said, with first -hand knowledge of the accuracy of her observation:

'The point is that the Communist goal is fixed and changeless - it never varies one iota from their objective of

WORLD DOMINATION

but if we judge them only by the direction in which they seem to be going, we shall be deceived'.

Yet the West is easily deceived -not least by those subtle means to which reference has been made and which have been deployed from the outset of Lenin's Revolution, based on Soviet elaborations of the findings of Dr Ivan Pavlov -the author of mind-control methodology developed through his experiments with dogs -with whom Lenin had extensive discussions, even  inviting him to stay for many weeks to elaborate his ideas about human and animal behaviour for Lenin realised that the Revolution could be saved and prosecuted with  much greater success if the means could be found of

standardising human thought and behaviour.

thereby establishing mental hegemony -which is the essence of

Gorbachev's 'New Thinking'.

...Steadily and persistently the Soviet regime is driving towards the ultimate goal:

control of human behaviour'

Thus  we can trace the origins of 'Political correctness' directly to the Soviet Leninists.

*

[There is much talk and media interest in the Georgian incident in August 2008. The article in the Daily Mail on 21.08-08

-WORLD PEACE? GIVE ME PUTIN ANYDAY

by Correlli Barnet.

We are in agreement with the article in general but one has to ask the question 'can Putin save Russia and Europe from an ingrained plot of a Leninist/Soviet -Pan German conspiracy of a

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVIST FUTURE

WITHIN A WORLD GOVERNMENT?

already agreed upon by bilateral treaties between the tripartite powers of

RUSSIA- GERMANY- FRANCE]

[Mr Putin is only one man against an ideology which he is unable to control as he knows himself as Colonel Vladimir Putin KGB/GRU.]

When the Author (Christopher Story) asked the so-called  'GRU'defector Victor Suvorov (not his real name) who lives in Britain, why British Intelligence Services had accepted the false, Leninist 'changes' of 1989/91, as genuine, he responded abruptly:

'Because they are stupid'  They must be:  it is reliably understood that MI6 now has, according to one knowledgeable  UK source

'hardly anyone is monitoring the former SOVIET UNION.'

 

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 15

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

THE REALITY OF GERMANY'S  'Leaning TOWARDS RUSSIA'.

Dr Helmut Kohl, the former  and subsequently disgraced German Chancellor, and his top colleagues who are engaged in pressing German strategy to its conclusion used grandiose, gothic , Dr Kohl's ideas 'Pan-German' language indistinguishable from the typically employed by Dr Adenauer. Dr Kohl's ideas were likewise derived from the tradition of Pan-German 'united Europe' strategy developed by the Haushofer - Ribbentrop school, elaborated under Hitler's regime,

expressed in Generalplan 1945 and expounded for many pre-war years by the influential 'united Europe' enthusiast Count Coudenhove-Kalergi -notably in a 15-page 'top secret' Memorandum to the German Government and General Staff dated 1932, which proposed the initial establishment of a German-French combine in economics, arms and foreign policy.  The Count's proposals surfaced 20 years later as the Schuman Plan, which recycled all the basic principles contained in that pre-war Pan - German Memoranda.

On the foundation, Dr Adenauer procured General de Gaulle's agreement to a bilateral Franco-German Treaty, which the French and German leaders signed on 22nd January 1963.

This crucial bilateral 'Franco-German Treaty of the Elysee provided the Pan-Germans with the foundation stone for their project

'to build the New Europe'.

Of unlimited duration, it provided that as a matter of routine,

'the two Governments will consult before any decision on all important questions of foreign policy...with a view to reaching as far as possible an analogous position'.

France is separately bound  under international law , by virtue of Article 6 of its  bilateral treaty of Cooperation between the Russian Federation and France , signed in Paris on 7th February 1992, to bring Russia into  an extended European federation, and to strengthen the bonds of solidarity...among all European states within a confederative approach'.

*

[Did you notice in regard to the South Ossetia question and the negotiations with the Russian Federation that it was the French President that appeared on the scene first and it was later  that the German Chancellor Angela Merkel [Head of German Intelligence Service DVD] arrived to give support. But as we have explained above they are a 'threesome' behind the scenes.]

[Each underlinied word has a separate bulletin]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

AUGUST- 2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 16

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

THE CONTINUITY OF GERMAN STRATEGIC DECEPTION

Just as there has been no true discontinuity of Soviet  strategy - only  a Leninist discontinuity ,designed to confuse the West, to entice it to 'converge' with the East to collective security, and to disarm - so, since the First and Second World Wars , has there been no discontinuity of

GERMAN STRATEGY.

It may be helpful to remind ourselves here of Anatoliy Golitsyn's useful distinction between a policy and a strategy. He points out that whereas a policy is overt, a strategy contains within itself a hidden, secret dimension designed to ensure the strategy's success.

German plans for European hegemony can be traced back to the 19th century and were clearly understood by Western observers at least until; the early 1950's.  In an article entitled

'The World Germanica'

published in the New York Herald Tribune dated 31st May 1940, Dorothy Thompson wrote:

'The Germans have a clear plan of what they intend to do in case of victory.  I believe that I know the essential details of that plan. I have heard it from a sufficient number of important Germans to credit its authenticity...Germany's plan is to make a customs union of Europe. with complete financial and economic control centred on BERLIN....

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

AUGUST- 2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 17

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

HOW THE WEST IS BLIND TO LENINIST DIALECTICAL DECEPTION

The dialectical method used to penetrate NATO OPENLY

On 9th May  1995, the British Prime Minister of the day ,john major, who was visiting Moscow, delivered a speech at the opening of a Second World War memorial, in which he assured the Russians that britain and its Western allies were determined 'not to isolate' Moscow.  The phraseology and syntax he employed on that occasion appeared to have been derived from the KGB's own writing school. Experience enables the analyst familiar with the revolutionary collective's methods and practices, to detect the provenance of language used in official pronouncements.  The fact that a prominent  Western figure uses the KGB's own forms of expression proves only that the user's mind, or that of his or her supporting bureaucracy, has been infected by the 'central Soviet control of thought process' identified by [the traitor] George Blake.

(John Major's pro-Russian interventions , though, were so extreme -witness his statement in his New Year's Day broadcast on 1st January,1992, looking forward to Russia becoming 'a fully-fledged member of the EC (EUROPEAN COMMUNITY)' and his pas-de-deux with the KGB officer Boris Pankin during the bombardment of the 'Black and White House', that other allegations have been advanced  

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

'Having banished the decisions of the past', said the British Prime Minister, echoing Gorbachev's propaganda line, 'we must not let even the shadow of a new division fall across Europe. We need to forge a chain of new relationships binding us together in a durable peace'  This comment precisely echoed the similar Leninist observation made by the Russian Foreign Minister of the day, Andrei Kozyrev. President Bill Clinton made a similar statement in 1997.

Such blindness has hidden from the West Moscow's routine of the dialectical political method to achieve its tactical and strategic objectives.

THe method usually involves the sudden emergence of two opposing official 'lines' -one of which is supportive of the option favoured by the West [thesis], and the other which is ostentatiously opposed to it...

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

AUGUST- 2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 18

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

DISREGARD OF GORBACHEV'S DISCIPLESHIP OF LENIN

In addition to the innumerable clues to Moscow's motives which have been missed by the somnolent. self-indulgent West in general, and by the blind European ideologues in particular, there has been a disgraceful failure by Western analysts and policymakers generally to read and understand what Gorbachev has himself repeatedly said about his continued adherence to Leninist revolutionary principles.  At every opportunity, Gorbachev has quite openly acknowledged his debt to Lenin.   There is accordingly no excuse whatever for the West's blindness -since, like Hitler in 'Mein Kampf', the Soviet leader laid Moscow's intentions bare.   As late as 1988, Gorbachev sought to dispel any notion in the West that he and the strategists had 'abandoned Marxism-Leninism' -a theme repeated in his books and in many speeches.

We see that confusion has arisen in some people's minds:

aren't we retreating from the positions of socialism, especially when we introduce new and unaccustomed forms of economic management and public life and aren't we subjecting the Marxist-Leninist teaching itself to revision?...

No, we are not retreating a single step from socialism, from Marxism-Leninism...

 

In his book 'Perestroika: New Thinking for My Country and  the World[Harrper & Row,New York,1987;Prennial Library edition,1988, [page 11-12] Gorbachev likewise wrote

''The works of Lenin and his ideals of socialism remained for us an inexhaustible source of dialectical creative thought, theoretical wealth and political sagacity...Turning to Lenin has greatly stimulated the Party and society in their search to find explanations and answers to the questions  that have arisen.... The Leninist period is indeed very important.  It is instructive that  it proved the strength of Marxist -Leninist dialectics, the conclusions of which are based on an analysis of the actual historical situation. Many of us realised even long before the [1985] plenary Meeting that everything pertaining to the economy, culture, democracy, foreign policy -all spheres -had to be appraised'

In ' Perestroika', too, Gorbachev plainly admitted:

We are not going to change Soviet power, of course, or abandon its fundamental principles, but we acknowledge the need for changes that will strengthen socialism.... The essence of 'perestroika'is that it... revives the Leninist concept of socialist construction both in theory and in practice'.....

[They say a leopard cannot change its spots and so it is with the Leninist Communist Party ideals to enslave the peoples of the world within a Gulag of collectivism under a World Government.  It is said that between 10,000 and 20,000 detainees and prison inmates die in penitentiary facilities annually in the Russian Federation. 'Soviet Analyst' published a  list of 30 forced labour camps in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan.]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

*

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

AUGUST- 2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 19

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

PRAGUE?-LETS GIVE IT TO GERMANY

Such observations could only have been made by a senior intelligence officer who was aware of the fact that President Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl, meeting in Geneva in September 1990, had included a secret Ribbentrop-Molotov-style agreement to divide Czechoslavakia, the details and proof iof which are presented [later]. Under the secret accord, the Czech Republic was to be  merged with Germany within 15-years of the agreement [2005]-although this was intended to occur within the parallel broader context of EUROPEAN FEDERALISM, in accordance with the long-range strategies of both the Comintern and of the Pan-Germany elite which continues to dominate and drive German policy today.

COMMUNISM COLLAPSE TWICE

When explaining in 'Perestroika' : New Thinking for our country and the World'  that the works of Lenin and his ideals of socialism remained for us an inexhaustible source of creative thought, theoretical wealth and political sagacity'...

If Communism had been abandoned in August 1921, why did it need abandoning again in 1991? Because it had NOT, in fact been 'thrown overboard' in 1921 AT ALL . That being the case, historians at least should have asked, what confidence could we have in the assertion that Communism had been abandoned in 1991?

[Possibly Edward Lucas with his article on Prague and the Soviet-led invasion of August 21, 1968 in the Daily Mail on Saturday, August 23, 2008 could enlighten us because we obtained the impression when he says: It is astonishing that, after 50 years of Soviet misrule, many in the Left still look back on that political doctrine  with something like akin to nostalgia.

Maybe it would be worthwhile for him to take the opportunity offered below and find the TRUTH which seems to have evaded him that the ideology is still securely in place.]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

AUGUST- 2008

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 20

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

ALWAYS BEAR IN MIND THAT YOU AND WE GERMANY AND THE USSR CAN DICTATE OUR TERMS TO THE WHOLE WORLD IF WE STAND TOGETHER.

And indeed the Pan-German elite has never forgotten that Soviet sentiment. It was summarised in a document, intercepted by Western intelligence, distributed by the

NAZI INTERNATIONAL in 1950

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

 to its various satellite centres, including Bonn, Lisbon and Buenos Aires, since known as the 'Madrid Circular' Which asserted:

'We must not forget that Germany has always considered orientation towards the West as a policy of expedience, or one to be pursued only under pressure of circumstances... All of our great national leaders have constantly counselled the long-range policy of close cooperation with the East.... The so-called American democracy does not deserve the sacrifice of the bones of even a single German ....What Germany needs in the future is not democracy but  a system of statecraft similar to that of the Soviet dictatorship which would enable the political and military elite in Germany to organise the industrial capacity of Europe and the military qualities of the German people for the survival of the German race and the re-establishment of Europe as a power centre in the world.'

This 'Madrid Circular' -prepared by 'former' Nazis based in Madrid whose colleagues invaded the Adenauer Governments structures to such an extent that, when asked in the Bundestag how many top Nazis were employed in the German Foreign Office Dr Adenauer replied that there were 134 of them-also contained statements such as  the following.'...

We will surely gain the undisputed leadership in Europe, not excluding Britain. In such a roundabout way we would be able to establish the foundation for future world leadership....

And with much of the media and press