The English with other Germanic tribes came to Britain over 1500 years ago. The streams of Teutonic influence decided the future of Europe.
With so much comment recently of the Germanic influence in Europe and its different effect in England and in the knowledge that up to the early years of the 20th century the people of England were on most friendly relations with the German States and it has taken two World Wars in the 20th century with Germany the Aggressor to change the friendly relations of the past with much caution in the future.
Today as we are all aware Germany with France are and have always been the engine of the European Union. There joint plan is to dominate Europe of which they make no secret of their intentions as the latest developments taking place within the EU even though the voters in France and Holland said NO! to the NEW CONSTITUTION of the
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
Ironically it had been France who had been our natural enemy for much of our history as was Scotland for many a year that it has often been said that Scotland was a thorn in our side and we were a thorn in the side of France or something along those lines.
The early years of the settlement of the English people in a land to be England produced in the manner of the conquest a different outcome in the future history of the world to the different Teutonic streams of conquest beyond our moated home, and in consequence in time a more united insular island people.
In order to address this question we will need to refer to the erudite work of a past historian Dr William Stubbs- Bishop of Oxford and Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford in his lectures on
ENGLISH HISTORY
1906
*
We will proceed-to England, of which I have ventured to affirm that it is a country in which Teutonic genus has been freely developed, notwithstanding the intermixture of the blood and the disturbances of foreign influences. And here the proposition that I have to lay down is briefly this: that the main paternal stock from which the English and their Constitution spring is Teutonic: Teutonic in source as from the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes of the first conquest; and Teutonic in the additional streams poured in from subsequent invasions of the Danes and Normans who, although by their different history and discipline they were made at the time of their introduction into England to exhibit an antagonism in language and institutions to the earlier stock, showed by the ease with which they mingled with it, and the rapidity with which within a century and a half they returned to it, that they were originally closely akin.
In intermixing with the English the Dane within a very few years cast off all that was Scandinavian, and the Norman retained in some few departments of language only what he had contracted during two centuries of a French home and apprenticeship to French institutions.
The Teutonic is the paternal element in the English race, as shown in physique, in language, in law, and in custom. This is my firm conclusion.
I need not tell you that it is one which has been and is still fiercely contested, nor could I lecture on the subject ever so superficially without devoting some time to argument on the points.
[In July 2006 a University project has revealed that the conquest of greater part of Britain was effected by the English with only little intermixture with the Celtic inhabitants within the conquered territory bordering the fastnesses and extremes of the Island.]
One or two topics I must put aside as too minute and remote from our general subject to be considered now, although in themselves of importance, especially the question to what extent was the British population before the great wave of Saxon conquest intermingled with German races from the opposite coast: where the Roman
legionnaires who occupied and may have helped in peopling Britain any of them of German origin?
Were the Belgae or the Coritavi of Britain akin to the German or half- German tribes that are said to have borne similar names abroad, or were the pirates of the Saxon shore tenants or only depredators of the British coast? If these be answered one way, they strengthen my argument; if they be answered the other, they do not weaken it.
To constitutional history in the remotest way they cannot be said to belong. Between them and the Anglo-Saxon system spreads the wave of Roman occupation.
Granted , then, that Britain when we first hear of it was inhabited by a race of Celtic, to whom. Perhaps, the name of Cymru is the proper tribal name, and who were broken up into little states, bearing names most of which are capable of reference to Celtic roots; that this race, partly by its own development, partly by commerce with the civilised nations of the Mediterranean and partly by intercourse with semi-civilised Gaul, had arrived before the Roman invasion at a sort of rude semi-civilisation which kept its enemies at bay; that it was subjugated by Rome with that cunning and cruelty which marked all Roman aggression, and when conquered consolidated with that strong and kind policy that marks as distinctively the hold which Rome maintained where she was certain that she had conquered; granted that when, in the decay of Rome, Britain was deserted by those who had defended and developed her, she was left with a mixed population and semi-Romanised institutions to work out her destiny alone; granting all this, what does history tell us followed?
*
[Added-February-2008]
[With our Nation
destroyer and supposed Foreign Minister David Miliband in mind in
2008 we relate:]
The Beginnings of the
Foreign Policy of England in the Middle Ages
In order to address this question we will need to refer to the erudite work of a past historian Dr William Stubbs- Bishop of Oxford and Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford in his lectures on
ENGLISH HISTORY
1906
....I have now to draw
my remarks to a conclusion. I have not proved that
ENGLAND
has always been on the
right side in all her foreign wars, but I have put before you facts
into which, if you will search for yourselves you will find, I think
that for the most part it has been so.
I am sure you will
find that in every European perturbation our country has been on the
side of
ORDER and FREEDOM.
I am sure you will
find that whatever have been the mistakes and sins of her statesmen
and soldiers, the strong
SPIRIT of a NATION
and the main current of
her policy - which could not flow if it were not sanctioned by the
strong
SPIRIT of the NATION
-strong in endurance as
well as
ACTION
has still been so.
And I think this is a
thing we
MAY BE PROUD OF.
And these
AIMS
have not been sought by
evil means.
ENGLISHMEN
may point with pride,
too, to the way they kept their
TREATIES
and supported the cause
they took up.
I do not say without
fear or reproach, but with a manly fear of all that is
DISHONEST and UNTRUE
[Not so with our own
FOREIGN
MINISTER in February-2008]
and in spite of every
reproach that
ENVY or HATRED
have dictated.
Our sympathies are often
engaged for AIMS the means towards which our
NATIONAL CONSCIENCE
cannot dare not approve
[Not so over the last 35
years since the TREATY of ROME and the road to our SLAVEDOM in 2008]
I suppose I need not go
further for proof of this than to our
NEUTRALITY
in the Italian and
American struggles (1859-1871)
non tale auxilo nic
defensoribus istis.
we may say, in spite of
every accusation of cold heartedness and interested policy.
MAY IT BE SO ALWAYS .
Such purity is the great
glory of a nation, far more than victorious armaments or perfectly
symmetrious institutions.
'Righteousness
exalteth a nation, and the righteousness of a nation is in this -
TRUTH and JUSTICE,
HONOUR and FAITHFULNESS.'
[This has been missing
over the last 35 years to our cost in February 2008 because the
majority of our member of
YOUR HOUSE OF COMMONS
have
SOLD YOUR COUNTRY
and its
VALUES
to a
FOREIGN POWER
for
MAMMON
*
*
* *
*
|
*
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of
138
*
Veteran parliamentarian
TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a
REFERENDUM
HEAR HIM ON
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
*
When you read the above you will realise
that it is
YOUR GOVERNMENT and
the majority of politicians who are guilty of TREASON.
The PEOPLE have the
RIGHT under
MAGNA
CARTA
to rise up and replace their so-called representatives.
This is NOT
THE TIME to be embarrassed about taking DIRECT ACTION
against those who are selling
YOUR COUNTRY
under your
noses.
WAKE UP!
ENGLAND
BEFORE IT IS
TOO LATE!
*
Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks
of the absolute necessity of a
REFERENDUM
HEAR HIM ON
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
*
WHAT A
CHEEK THE MAN HAS!
Our inexperienced and excuse for a Foreign
Minister the out of his depth David Miliband on Channel 4
tonight has stated that he wishes the Provinces of the
United States of Europe which was once England and Britain
to do what it can to assist the rise of DEMOCRACY world
-wide while his GOVERNMENT has destroyed a unique DEMOCRACY
and parliamentary system of over 700 years in the making.
As we have mentioned on a number of
occasions the great European and Englishman Lord Acton
(1834-1902) in his Historical Essays and Studies had a quote
which fits perfectly Mr Miliband and his GOVERNMENT
'Power tends to corrupt
and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great man are almost
always bad men.'
And after a decade of New Labour we agree
.
After the Second World War UNESCO sent out
a questionaire to all nation states asking them to give
their interpretation of
DEMOCRACY.
The replies covered a variety of what was
termed
DEMOCRACY
In the 21st century we have had George
Bush and Tony Blair with their false idea of
DEMOCRACY
and in the opening months of 2008 we have
another Prime Minister Gordon Brown and his Foreign Minister
David Miliband with their own interpretation of the same
term which in their eyes allows them to destroy a unique
PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY the first seed of a unique tree
which it roots have over many centuries have reached other
countries and the recipient has taken what has served their
purpose knowing that the TREE of DEMOCRACY was still alive
in many parts of the English Speaking World and others who
decided not to replace the original seed but to be its most
fervent upholders of such a FONT of TRUST in FREE PEOPLE
over the EVIL that existed then and now in many parts of the
world.
As we have stated above the Second Reading
on the New EU TREATY has been passed by the TRAITOROUS
PARLIAMENT by 138 votes. Such TREASON in the home of such a
unique CHAMBER of LIBERTY-The once PROTECTOR of the RIGHTS
and LIBERTIES of the ENGLISH PEOPLE so TREASURED by
AMERICANS in their struggle for FREEDOM shows to the world
the true character of those who were committed by TRADITION
and CONSTITUTION to PROTECT such LIBERTY as shown in the
HOUSE of COMMONS on the
21st January 2008 -
An ACT OF
INFAMY
which ALL who love FREEDOM
world-wide will view with INTREPIDATION and DESPAIR.
Mr David Miliband is
certainly together with his colleagues in the Nest of
Treason in No 10
'Joker in the Pack'
but no one is laughing!
- except the crazy gang who
have betrayed
YOUR COUNTRY.
8.40 pm-Tuesday,12th February,2008
*
|
*
Let the people speak!
www.makeitanissue.org.uk
*
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an
OPPOSITION to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
GORDON BROWN WANTS
TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
*
67%
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want
a REFERENDUM
*
PETITION
FOR A
REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum
*
July 18-2007
VOTE
-2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
‘DO
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY
BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T
VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR
MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
*
Home
Rule
for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
[All underlined words have a
separate bulletin]
HOME |