|
SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY? * Much has been written over the last 50 years as to the benefits or otherwise of DEVOLUTION IN SCOTLAND and WALES BUT LITTLE ABOUT AN ENGLISH PARLIAMENT
[We do however acknowledge the major contribution to the subject over the past decades of the erudite work of the writer and columnist Simon Heffer whose work is the present nucleus of our England Matters! bulletin board.] We have over the years heard much about the impossibility of DEVOLUTION -for Scotland and Wales and for that matter ENGLAND.
Today in July 2007 we can see an established Scottish SNP led Scottish Parliament AND A Welsh Assembly with a Nationalist/Labour administration BUT WHAT ABOUT ENGLAND? It appears all governments have done little to bring about an ENGLISH PARLIAMENT They have said over the years it is because it is not wanted by the English People This was until recently an acknowledged fact and when one looks into the English mind one has on the whole the reason for it. But the advent of DEVOLUTION AND NATIONHOOD -has roused the English people -and an awakening has reached the usually taciturn ENGLISH The EDP came into existence over 12 years ago to champion the INDEPENDENCE OF ENGLAND IN A FAMILY OF NATION STATES OF A GREATER BRITAIN. Since that time as we all know England has been ignored as to its unique identity and historical place as the innovator of parliamentary democracy now a basic framework for the majority of nation states in the world today. Over the years many erudite commentators in the political and industrial field have expressed their opinions as to the viability or otherwise of such a quasifederal arrangement. With the passing of time many of those opinions as to the practicality of the devolution question have been finally accepted and are now in place. BUT WHAT ABOUT ENGLAND? Well you might well ask why the English people and in this description we include all loyal subjects that reside in the land of that name -which until recently has been a word forbidden for over four decades though the first glimmerings of this travesty of justice showed itself in the late 1930s by the Scottish newspaper proprietors erasing the word ENGLAND -and replacing it with BRITAIN. As a people we have been slow quite naturally to react to the persistent talk of Britishness when to all intents and purposes such a term -now a much acclaimed phrase of our SCOTTISH PRIME MINISTER OF ENGLAND -because as we all know the matters concerning Scotland and Wales in the main are matters for their FIRST MINISTERS. It has been said that a federal system similar to the Federal German would not be possible because of the differences of size and population of the nation states concerned.
WE DISAGREE -with this assumption as for the last three decades many matters once held to be unworkable have been proved to be spurious. In order for the quasifederal arrangement to succeed in BRITAIN [Yes! we do use the word when it is in context] -as a whole it is imperative that the quasifederal links are few to ensure that as has been much quoted in the past
'He who pays the piper calls the tune'
AND 'Devolution should not be just about POLITICS and POWER It is about the Spirit and Goals of our National Life' Reverend William Johnstone -to the Assembly to the Kirk in 1975 -which draw attention to our PRIME MINISTER GORDON BROWN. HOW WILL WE ACHIEVE OUR AIM?
Well we can learn from the past and in particular from the SNP who from their early days have directed their appeal to the WOMEN and YOUTH OF SCOTLAND This is not to say that other members of the family should not equally take part in the drive for NATIONHOOD. *
LET US FACE THE ACTUAL REALITY
SCOTLAND IS FOR SCOTLAND
WALES IS FOR WALES
SO WHY CAN'T ENGLAND BE FOR ENGLAND When all nation states in our shared island home are independent nation states with a loose quasifederal links then and only then can we Prime Minister Gordon Brown
JOIN YOU IN YOUR OFTEN
Clarion call OF 'BRITISHNESS' IN A GREATER BRITAIN.
* * * JULY/2007
* THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING? *
Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH
REJECTION SAY VOTERS by Daniel
Martin Political
Reporter
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June
18,2008]
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should
drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its
rejection in last week's
IRISH REFERENDUM'
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch
bid in the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
RATIFICATION OF
THE TREATY.
And
10,000 people
have signed a
PETITION
on the
DOWNING STREET-
WEBSITE
within the past few days
JUNE16-2008
, calling on the
GOVERNMENT
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
Downing Street
website is
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/
*
JUNE 18-2008
*
The abolition of Britain * * Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a REFERENDUM HEAR HIM ON http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o *
* [Latest Addition - June07] * * *
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
* GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU? * 67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM * FOR A REFERENDUM SIGN TODAY ON LINE * July 18-2007
VOTE -2007
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE TO SET YOU FREE
THE UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER
‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER BUT SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES. *
ONLY WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE *
SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
*
* [All underlined words have a separate bulletin]
|