VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

 

&

AT THE REFERENDUM

WHICH MUST BE HELD IN THE FOUR NATION STATES

VOTE TO LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC

 NAZI-PLANNED EU.

 

Est. 1994-

Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links -Immigration- Archive-Top Topics and Stats 

*HOME-PT 2

 

 

PREVIOUS:

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ PAGE FOUR/PAGE FIVE/

OCTOBER-PT2-2012/

NOVEMBER-PT2-2012

DECEMBER-PT2-2012

JANUARY-PT2-2013

 FEBRUARY-PT2-2013

 

 Shortened versions

FEBRUARY-PT2-2013

- MARCH-PT2-2013

APRIL-PT2-2013

LATEST!-

-MAY-PT 2-2013

 

CLICK HERE FOR

NEW PART 3

 

 

 

 

FREEDOM CORNER

 

 

 

FREEDOM!

 

 

...We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

 

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

 

 

 

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

&

 

WE ASK ON OCTOBER 30,2015

WHAT PROGRESS have the SMALL PARTIES MADE to COMBINE to FIGHT this

GROSS INJUSTICE?

 

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

 

*

 

Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

*

 

 

[As we have stated over many years we have been suspicious of UKIP leadership particularly of Nigel Farage who though he has the necessary 'gift of the gab' and charisma for the job-he has admitted  he has a History of working for over 20 years in the City Mile of London -an independent state-a hotbed of

TREASON-INTRIGUE-GREED-MURDER-CONSPIRACY

 for over 300 years.]

&

How The Crown Rules the World

 

[Comments in brackets are ours!]

 

OCTOBER 30-2015

 

RON PAUL_THE LIBERTY PARTY 9-11+(1) GLOBALWARMING SCAM USA IRAQ/AFGHAN LONDON BOMBINGS COMMON PURPOSE CONSPIRACY CENTRAL BANKS  +(1)
IMMIGRATION ARCHIVE

HOME

 MAIN BULLETINS E U  ENGLAND +(1) BILDERBERGERS+(1) ILLUMINATI +(1)

GLOBALIZATION

NEW WORLD ORDER +(1)
1)U.S. Concentration Camps

2)DEC-2011- MADE-READY

3) PLANS

1)

FEMA

2)

1)Protocols

of

ZION

 

2)

ZIONISM

 

CITY

OF

LONDON

 

 A STATE WITHIN ENGLAND

+(2)

 Dr.

John

Coleman

WHO OWNS

THE FED

 

POWER

OF 1)HAARP FOR GOOD   2)EVIL

Mind Control Henry Makow 1)Chemtrails

2)CREATED

C3)

1)

PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS

 

2)

(1)

War

is a Racket

 

(2)

A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003
realzionistnews.

 

 

&

BROTHERNATHANAEL

CHANNEL.

COM

 

TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967   DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
 

BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

 

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

NADER LIBRARY.COM-

TERRORISM-ILLUMINATI

 

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.
 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 
 
 

BRITAIN and EUROPE

The Culture of Deceit

 

by

Christopher Booker

 

[With our FREEDOM and BIRTHRIGHT now in jeopardy we turn once more to the sterling work of an Englishman like so many others who have been fighting for three decades or more to protect our HERITAGE. Though the work was published in 2001 it is as important today in February 2007 ]

*

The Strange Case of the Werner Report.

 

It is not often a British Prime Minister remains active in politics long enough to be caught out by secret papers released under the 30-year rule from the time he was in office. But such a case in January 2001 when the Public Record Office at Kew opened files relating to Edward Heath's application to join the Common Market in 1970.

The most striking of these documents were those reflecting the Heath's Government's reaction to something called

' Werner Report'

.In 1969, the Council of Ministers had commissioned the Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Pierre Werner, to draw up a plan to move the Common Market [as it was then called] forward to full economic and monetary union. As luck would have it, his confidential report began circulating in Brussels in October 1970, just as Britain's negotiations to enter the European Economic Community were getting under way.

In the British Foreign Office, as we can now see, the Werner Report rang fearful alarm bells. A secret briefing note to Mr.Heath from Con O'neill, the senior civil servant responsible for Europe, explained that, if implemented, Werner's proposals would have enormous political repercussions.  They envisaged

"a process of fundamental political importance, implying progressive development towards a political union".

The long - term objectives of economic and monetary union, it was made clear to Mr Heath,

"are very far-reaching indeed"

going

"well beyond the full establishment of a Common Market". 

The Werner plan could lead to

"the ultimate creation of a European federal state, with a single currency. All the basic instruments of national economic management (fiscal, monetary, incomes and regional policies) would ultimately be handed over to the central federal authorities. The Werner report suggests that this radical transformation of present Communities should be accomplished within a decade [by 1980?]

Such a political and economic union, possibly also including a Common Defence Policy, would thus involve a massive loss of national sovereignty, which would ultimately leave member states with somewhat less power

 "than the autonomy enjoyed by the States of the USA"

But what alarmed the Foreign Office was not the contents of the Werner Report. Mr Heath and his [traitorous] ministers did not throw up their hands in horror and

"good heavens, we had no idea this was what the Common Market is about. We could not possibly accept such a thing"

On the contrary when Geoffrey Rippon, the minister in charge of our negotiations, went to see M.Werner on October 27, the minutes of their discussion show that Rippon went out of his way to congratulate him on his report, which he said

"well stated our common objectives". privately, her Majesty's Government had no objection to the political union Werner was proposing. (PRO/CAB 164/771)

[Well as we have shown on our FRONT PAGE -Geoffrey Rippon -Roy Jenkins and Edward Heath had been NAZI agents for at least 30 years since they were together in Balliol College-Oxford . They were reported to MI5  because of their suspicious activities by the Master of Balliol- Lindsay. Full details on our BULLETIN BOARD.]

The only real concern of Mr Heath and his colleagues was that this plan should NOT be talked about too openly in public, because this might so inflame public opinion that it would be much harder to persuade Parliament and the British people that it was in their interests to join what they were being assured was no more than a 'Common Market', intended to boost TRADE.

It was vital, Mr Rippon urged on M. Werner that this goal of political and economic union should be achieved only in a

"step by step approach"

because

 "it was natural for the people to be afraid of change"

and

"part of his problem in Britain was to reassure people that their fears were unjustified".

 

When these documents were released 30 years later, this was confirmed by a retired Foreign Office official Sir Crispin Tickell, who  had played an intimate part in Britain's Common Market negotiations as Geoffrey Rippon's private secretary and was present at the meeting with Werner. In a BBC interview Tickell frankly admitted that, although worries over Britain's loss of sovereignty had been

"very much present in the mind of the negotiators",

the line had been "the less they came out in the open the better.

Here was chapter and verse to show how politicians and civil servants had been party to a quite deliberate attempt to hide from the British people what Britain's entry into the Common Market was letting them in for. So successful were they at burying the Werner report, indeed, that when 30 years later the journalist Hugo Young came to compile This Blessed Plot his lengthy and detailed history of Britain's relations with Europe, he did not even mention it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To be continued-BELOW

[You haven't heard the last of it!]

For a book of the work: -

Britain and Europe: The Culture of Deceit-

June Press Ltd

P.O. Box 9984

London W12 8wz

020-8746-1206

[Further details under Eurofacts- EDP Front Page]

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding &Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets.]

 

FEBRUARY/07

 

 

*

 

 

 

ADDED-JAN 8-2016

 

continued from above

 

But this curious glimpse of what was going on behind the scenes back in 1970 provides an apt starting point to explore one of the oddest things which has ever happened to British public life: the way in which our involvement with the "European project" has introduced an element of

deliberate deceit into our politics

 

[Well! what do you expect when you have Nazi traitors in the government of the day, possibly even in 2016. Tony Blair knew the danger and secretly changed the law on

TREASON

 

-.which, in its depth and scale, has no historical parallel. To anyone who follows such matters in detail, nothing is more striking than the way, again and again, we see supporters of Britain's participation in this project apparently having to resort to obfuscation and subterfuge, both to disguise what the project is really about and to hide what they themselves are up to. And the fundamental; reason for this culture of concealment is that there have always been two quite different perceptions as to the nature of this European project [EUROPEAN UNION].

For 40 years [written in 2001] British politicians have consistently tried to portray it to their fellow-citizens as little more than an economic arrangement: a kind of free-trading area primary concerned with creating jobs and prosperity, which incidentally can help preserve the peace.

On the continent, however, right back to the dreamtime of Jean Monnet and Robert Schuman in the late 1940s and early 1950s, the 'European construction', as its supporters call it, was always seen as something very much more ambitious.  However long it took, and however much it might be desirable not to come too much into the open about it, the long-term aim of the project was always that the countries of western Europe should eventually come together in

complete political and economic union.

The setting up of a common market (which itself was never intended to be a free trade area but a highly regulated internal market protected against external competition by tariff barriers) was regarded as merely a first step along the way. And thisn is of course precisely what we have seen over the past 50 years,[65 years in 2016] as the whole project has inched forward, step by step, treaty by treaty, directive by directive always moving in the same direction towards that distant, never very clearly defined but always utterly consistent goal

The real problem for the British [English] has been that, from the moment our politicians first decided inn the 1960s and 1970s that we should join the project, they have never dared to admit openly to the British [English] people that this was its true nature and purpose. And this has had two particularly damaging consequences.

[THE BASTARDS WERE LYING THEN AS THEY ARE TODAY IN JANUARY 2016]

The first is that, right from the start, it created that need for a

CULTURE of DECEIT

whereby our politicuians and civil servants have consistently tried to downplay the significance of 'Europe', and to present it as something different from what it is.  Apart from anything else, this meant that every time the project has taken another step towards its ultimate goal, as that original "EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY" first evolved in the 1980s into just the "ECONOMIC COMMUNITY", then in the 1990s into the

EUROPEAN UNION

Britain's politicians have at every stage along the way had to go through that process with which we are now so wearyingly familiar: whereby first they express opposition to much of what their continental partners are proposing: then find themselves having to agree to more than intended; and finally have to hide from the British [English] people just how much

THEY HAVE GIVEN AWAY.

The second, rather less obvious consequence has been the need to conceal the startling extent to which our ever-greater involvement in 'Europe' is now changing the way in which Britain [England] is governed. Few features of our political scene have in recent years been more curious than the way our politicians and civil servants try to hide away how deeply our political system is now enmeshed with the European Union and how much of the legislation which rules our lives now derives from

BRUSSELS

All too often we see them announcing new policies or laws which pretend are our own, only for it to emerge that they are merely passing edicts from the EU.

Again and again we see them having to conceal just how much of the power to run our [YOUR!] country has been

GIVEN AWAY

to  a new system of government which has no particular concern for

THE INTERSTS OF THE PEOPLE OF BRITAIN

[ENGLAND].

But ultimately this CULTURE of CONCEALMENT, which is far more prevalent to Britian than any other country in Europe, derives from that same basic act of

DECEPTION:

the pretence that the nature of the 'European project' is something different from

WHAT IT IS.

*

END OF

THE STRANGE CASE OF THE WERNER REPORT

 

TO FOLLOW:

Part 3-Mr Macmillan and 1961

Part 4-Mr Heath and 1970

Part 5-Mrs Thatcher and 1985

Part 6-From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

Part 7-The price we have paid

Part 8-Epilogue

*

[The English people have been too trusting of their duplicitous politicians as the above article has clearly shown. Even after 43 years since the Accession Treaty of 1972 which came into effect  on  Ist January 1973 we are only now in 2016 seeing any real opposition to any further involvement in the monstrosity calling itself the European Union which is now facing a challenge from many patriots in once free countries -of people's who were also BETRAYED by their POLITICIANS and now demand back their once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

 

The moment when our political leaders first took this FATEFUL DECISION to CONCEAL the REAL PURPOSE of the EUROPEAN PROJECT from the BRITISH people was NOT, IN FACT, 1970 but TEN YEARS EARLIER when , in 1960, Harold Macmillan's Government began discussing the dramatic reversal of NATIONAL POLICY which was to lead to our FIRST ABORTIVE APPLICATION to join the [supposed] COMMON MARKET.

 

This we can see from an illuminating book published in 1995 by Lionel Bell, The Throw That  Failed, based on studying Cabinet papers which reflected those discussions in the month's leading to our application in the summer of 1961.  What was striking about the documents Bell uncovered was just how frank Macmillan and his colleagues had been in private, even at that early stage, over where the COMMON MARKET was heading. They were in little doubt it was intended to be just a

 

FIRST STEP towards eventual POLITICAL and ECONOMIC UNION.

 

YET THIS THEY DECIDED SHOULD BE KEPT HIDDEN FROM THE BRITISH PEOPLE.

 

because otherwise

 

IT WOULD NOT BE ACCEPTABLE

 

The Common Market

had to be presented as

 

NO MORE THAN A TRADING ARRANGEMENT.

 

Even before the Treaty of Rome had been signed in 1957, the

 

FOREIGN OFFICE!

 

had been briefed to the effect that its six original signatures wanted:

 

 

" to achieve tighter European integration through the creation of European institutions with supranational powers in the economic field... the underlying motive of the Six, however, essentially political;". (PRO/FO 371/150360. Bell op.cit.p.1

 

 

In the summer of 1960, when British entry was first being actively discussed behind closed doors, Sir Roderick Barclay, head of the UK delegation to the European Commission in Brussels, sent a despatch to the Foreign Office stressing, in Mr Bell's words.

 

"that the aim of the Community was not merely harmonisation but  the unification of policies in every field of the economic union. i. e. economic policy, commercial policy, tariff policy and fiscal policy. That this was not just pie in the sky [it] needed to be made clear to the politicians". (based on PRO/FO 371/150363,Bell p.220

 

 

When Edward Heath, Minister of State for Europe

 visited professor Hallstein, the President of the European Commission, in November 1960, his report on the meeting noted how Hallstein had emphasised that joining the Community was not just a matter of adopting a COMMON TARIFF " which was t

 

 ESSENTIAL HALLMARK of any 'STATE' (and he regarded the EEC as a POTENTIAL 'STATE')

 

It would be necessary, Hallstein insisted, for any new entrant to accept the principle that the EEC was intended to evolve into something much deeper, "some form of

 

FEDERAL STATE"

 

which was what the Commission was working towards (PRO/FO 371/150369).

Particularly revealing in this context was a reply given in December 1960  the

 vLord Chancellor , Lord Kilmuir, to a request from

 MrHEATH

for comments on what would be the constitutional implications of signing the Treaty For Britain's sovereignty. Kilmuir responded that in several respects the loss of sovereignty would be considerable: by Parliament; by the Crown in terms of treaty-making powers; and by the courts, which to an extent would be" subordinate" to the

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE

(PRO/FO 371/15039,Bell pp.36-9)

On the making of laws, Kilmuir said it was clear that:

" the council of Ministers would eventually (after the system of qualified majoority of voting had come into force) make regulations that would be binding on us even against our wishes...It wouold in theory be possible for Parliament to enact at the outset legislation which would give automatic force of law to any existing or future regulations made by the appropriate organs of the Community. For Parliament to do this would go far beyond the most extensive delegation of powers, even in wartime, that we have ever experienced and I do not think there is any likelehood of this being acceptable to the House of Commons."

AS for the subordination of Britain's courts to the European Court of Justice, Kilmuir wrote:

 " I must emphasise that in my view the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serious ones, and I think that, as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade Parliamenrt or the British public to accept them. I am sure that it would be a great mistake to underestimate the force of the objections to them. But these objections should be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this stage, those who arwe opposed to the whole idea of joining the Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging effect later on".

These are pretty direct warnings. And when in summer of 1961 the Cabinet finally considered whether to apply for entry, Mr Macmillan opened the discussion by pointing out that the first question they needed to consider was that

"... If we were to sign the TREATY of ROME we should have to accept its political objectives, and althiough we should be able to inflence the political outcome we did not know what this would be "(Bell pp.59-62)

Macmillan conceded that a decision to go in would "raise great presentational difficulties". On the one hand, it would be important to convince the Six that "we genuinely supported the objectives of the Treaty". On the other:"

"we should have to satisfy public opinion in this country that the implementation of the objectives of the Treaty would not require unacceptable social and other adjustments. The problems of public relations would be considerable."

Nevertheless the Cabinet rules in favour. Mr Heath was sent off to Brussels to negotiate

 

But when two weeks later, his fellow Cabinet Minister Duncan Sandys followed him to Brussels, and made a speech emphasising that the British Government recognised the Treaty of Rome was not just an economic agreement but also had important "political content" (FO 371/158302) Heath became alarmed that he might be letting the cat out of the bag. As Bell discovered:

" He set officials urgently to work to check what Ministers had been saying in public and a line was developed of arguing that the Treaty contained no political obligations, only implications. The United Kingdom would not regard itself as committed to any particular development or extensions of obligations simply by virtue of

 [supposed only]  EEC membership". (based on M.Camps, Britain and the European Community 1955-63, cited in Bell p.74)

This was to remain the line until in JANUARY 1963,

President de Gaulle

vetoed Macmillans attempt to join

Although the Cabinet was well aware that the Common Market was ultimately a Political project  ,involving considerable surrender of sovereignty, and was likely to develop much further in these respects in the future, this was not what the British people were to be told.  All this was to be down played in favour of a pretence that the Common Market was a little more than its name implied: a trading agreement which would be good for Britain's economy. It was a line which was still to be the official orthodoxy four decades later.

The SEEDS of the CULTURE of DECEIT HAD BEEN SOWN.

*  *  *

 

 

*  *  *

ADDED INFORMATION FROM THE LATE

CHRISTOPHER STORY- A

PATRIOT and TRUTH SEEKER

Nevertheless the Cabinet rules in favour. Mr Heath was sent off to Brussels to negotiate the terms of British entry. And on October 10-1961 he made his opening speech to the opther member hgovernments, he could not havbe been more fulsome in expressing Britain's desire" To become full wholehearted and active members iof the European VCiommunity in its widest sence, and to go forward with you in building a new Europe" (Bell p.73).

 

 

[The surrender to the Nazi-planned EU of 1940 and 1943 in their Geopolitical centre in Madrid-Spain-

"But the German Geopolitical saw it that Nazism and its worldwide idolatry would not merely survive the destruction of Hitler and the loss of the war, but would  be strengthened as a consequence of deploying new, much more subtle 'Third Way' psycho techniques. The Nazi International further instructed its outlets and cadres that as far as the Geopolitical centre was concerned the WAR HAD NEVER CEASED, and would continue until complete victory was assured The Geopolitical Centre boasted that it had successfully duped US policy planners. Thus The Madrid Circular letter explained:'Germany has emerged from the Cold War as the chief beneficiary. That is our great asset in the ledger...since Potsdam. For the first  time in the history of nations, it has been proven that clever [Nazi] propaganda, especially when it is camouflaged and directed through other channels accomplishes far more than the mightest army or best diplomatic service of a smoothly functioning state.

 

 It is the great mistake to assume that Western Germany recuperated so quickly thanks to America's sympathetic concern for us. We repeatedly encounter, especially as expressed by some politicians in Bonn, the idiotic opinion: But the Americans have put us back on our feet, should we therefore not show our gratitude?'  To this our answer is as follows:   The Americans put us back on our feet, not purely for altruistic reasons but for their selfish interests and on the basis of clever calculation. It must not be our worry but theirs if in the last resort their calculations prove to be abysmally stupid. WE are not wholly innocent in [respect of] the shift of America's post-war policy.'[The above is a reference to the devious means by which the German Nazi geopolitical planners in Madrid  managed to contrive a comprehensive US policy U-turn [The Late Christopher Story-PATRIOT and TRUTH SEEKER of the International Currency Review -2005 which wasm sent to us in October 2005 and which is the content of many our our over 2000 bulletins since 2003.]

TO BE CONTINUED

European Union Exposed-A Criminalised organisation/ ****Revealed after his death that Edward Heath an agent of Nazi International and traitor to his country for 60 years./****The term DVD stands for German Defence Agency or Secret Service/****Foreign Powers direct our government by payouts/**** A traitor full of honours from his country-Why?/**** What were the dark actors playing games which the patriot Dr David Kelly referred? - Was it an Illuminati plan to use biological weapons to reduce the population of the world by 95%?/****  German-Nazi-Geopolitical Centre established in Madrid in 1943 by Heinrich Himmler/****A plague of treachery-corruption and sculduggery has taken over once proud democracies/**** The Enemy is everywhere/****Warning from our man in Washington/****German-Nazi-Geopolitical Centre/.****  Germany as strongman of Europe- A Germanised Empire in the making/****  A warning message to the freedom loving people of England/ **** 50 years of surrender/ ****Britain can leave the EU unilaterally and cease payment says Queen's Counsel/

 

'Change must be organic, not mechanical; natural not artificial. Nations  are organisms; they cannot be  taken to pieces and reconstructed. Man does not create he only combines or separates. And in this sense every man can and ought to be a reformer.'

'The English character is immoderately moderate. [True] Englishmen hear both sides, and grumble about injustice. They are  all for reform, and "enlarge a cowshed into a palace" rather than pull down the cowshed and build a palace. Even the so-called revolution of 1688 hardly changed the national landmarks.  So evil gets sterotyped, and incongruities and anomalous survivals hamper progress.  Politicians modify enactments intended for a different state of things. The English "Poor Laws," though originally framed to repress those who were little better than serfs, have been changed for the protection of freemen.  Social reform to check pauperism and aid distress, is eminently needed. "There is," says Peter Plymley, " always a copious supply of Lord Sidmouths in the world." When more radical changes were proposed in 1866, the cry was, "save the ten-pound franchise, the bulwaerk of the English constitution, the salt of political ideas."...

The truest priciples for parliamentary reform are those which ensure (a) equal electoral divisions; (b) repression of  bribery  [political donors  and friends and others of unjustified elevation to the Lords] (c) an educational  standard; [In 2016 the English are well down the list of world educational standards.](d) some relation between bearing State burdens and enjoying State privileges;(e) a recognition of the claims of religion and morality by the side of material prosperity, and the bestowal of the franchise on everyone, man or women, who can use a vote with judgement and honesty.[1885-F.STORR, B.A & C.H. GIBSON, M.A.BACON'S ESSAYS. Page 212]

 

[You haven't heard the last of it!]

For a book of the work: -

Britain and Europe: The Culture of Deceit-

June Press Ltd

P.O. Box 9984

London W12 8wz

020-8746-1206

[Further details under Eurofacts- EDP Front Page]

 

 

 

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

 

*

       
   

 

CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!

 

A BLUNT REPLY TO THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th DECEMBER ,2007.

*

 

 

TIME FOR DECISION-DECEMBER,2007

 

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!

*

The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of

THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA

*

The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS

*

MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

*

YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.

 

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS  QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.

OR

WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.

WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!

 

THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE

'Rights and Liberties'

of

Englishmen

Will keep by HER SACRED OATH

or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a  THEME PARK in the future

THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.

We are told on the BBC  (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT

'Stuck in the past'

Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of  our

FREEDOM and COUNTRY.

 

Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world.

THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!

 

Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC  as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's  INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by

PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.

 

If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION.

WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?

THEY ARE PRICELESS!

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED

*

 

The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST!

6 months to be EXACT!

*

 

THE EU

 

WE-AND THEM!

 

WE are to join THEM

THEY are not joining US

WE have more to LOSE

THEY have more to GAIN

WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY

THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!

*

Our Queen and the EU Constitution

*

The Spirit of England

by

Winston Churchill

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II

*

We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.

 

 As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER. 

The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.

There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'

Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the  Monarch talks  our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very  noses?

Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS  are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.

We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES  ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.

As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTUTUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.

IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded  we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.

Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a

THEME PARK

*

Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION

and the need for a

REFERENDUM

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

*

 

[All words/word underlined  have a separate bulletin]

 

 
     

'Taking Liberties'

is on show in cinemas across the country.

Visit: www.noliberties.com

 

 

*          *          *

*

 

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

July 18-2007

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

 

 
 
Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

 

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

 

.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.

 

+THE HISTORY OF THE MONEY CHANGERS

 

JUNE-2012

 

 

 KNOWN GOOD GUYS UNDER SUSPICION OF BEING PROVOCATEURS ON BEHALF OF THE ILLUMINATI.

As we have explained elsewhere it is this typical situation which we must fear the most and expect this insidious practice of the satanic ILLUMINATI who wish to ensure where possible that it is THEIR STOOGE in CONTROL! within their ENEMIES camp.  We suspect that there are many more within UKIP [-possibly even MEP's-one talking about a deal with the Conservative party ] and  BNP and other declared advocates across the political spectrum pursuing  FREEDOM! and NATION STATE! who will soon share the space below.

There are always great difficulty in these matters and one can only go on the actions and contacts of the individuals involved.

There can be no greater or more heinous crime imaginable than for one to betray the TRUST of a COMRADE fighting for a JUST! and GOOD CAUSE!

'It is said: 'No man can justly censure or condemn another, because indeed no man truly knows another'

But what we are considering is at a time when those who intend to destroy the majority of mankind and make serfs of the majority allowed to live and  It is a WAR we are FIGHTING for SURVIVAL! and in such circumstances a persons ACTIONS or lack of ACTION! are the ONLY basis on which one can JUDGE! another.

Finally it is up to the membership of UKIP and BNP to purge THEIR PARTY of the TRAITORS within and look for those who have the fire in their belly to carry the party forward to VICTORY!

 

MAY-2012

 

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

*

IS SENATOR RON PAUL- ILLUMINATI?

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

MAY-2012

 
 

HOME