THE

"Rights and Liberties

of the

English People"

'...The common law was a law for all - for the army and the administration no less than for civilians and subjects; for the noble as much as the commoner.   The judges judged all alike by a SINGLE LAW,   The nobles kicked against the pricks, and demanded a judgment by peers; their resistance was unavailing, and silently disappeared.   Even the KING was conceived to be legibus alligatus.   This is the keynote of

" for in brief it means this," wrote [Professor] Maitland,"

A chief justice of the fourteenth century could even declare that he had seen a WRIT

addressed to

 Henry III

,

"Praecipe Henrico regi Angliae,"

by which he was summoned to give redress under the law; and it is certain that the Song of Lewes (of the year 1264) goes to this length:

" Think not it is the king's goodwill that makes the law to be-

For the law is steadfast and the king has no stability-

NO!

law stands high above the king [Queen], for law is that true light

Without whose ray the king [Queen] would stray, and wander from the right.

When a king [Queen] strays, he [She] ought to be called back into the way

By those he [She]  rules, who lawfully his [Her] will may disobey

Until he [She] seeks the path; but when  his [Her] wandering is o',

They ought to help and succour him [Her], and love him [Her] as before."

(translation of professor York Powell]

'...What it has done is to make progress clothe itself in the disguise of a recovery of some ancient but forgotten or neglected, law or right.  This is conspicuous in the struggles of the seventeenth century.  The adherents of the parliamentary side desired progress, and they even went to war for its sake; but they stood on legal ground and they called their cause the recovery of the undoubted birthright and inheritance of Englishmen.  They desired as a member said in 1628,

" to see the good old decrepit law of

They sought, in a word, for progress; but it is called precedent. No doubt precedent gets twisted and distorted when it is bent to the course of progress; no doubt progress moves tortuously, when it has to go by an imagined way of precedent   there is a certain unreality in a legal revolution; there is a certain frank directness

in the pure revolutionary doctrine embraced in FRANCE , of a natural law which transcends the positive law, and of "natural rights of men and citizens" which abrogate legal prescriptions but compromise is dear to Englishmen; and the compromise between precedent and progress is peculiarly characteristic of their history.  

Nor is it unfortunate in its results.  It leaves the temper of the law triumphant, even in the midst of change.   It makes change less rapid; but it also makes it more secure.   We cannot advance until we feel that we have secured our communications with the past, and are accompanied and guarded by the ghostly artillery of venerable precedents.   - NATIONAL CHARACTER-ERNEST BARKER-1927.

[Is this not the reason that even after 39 years since entering the reputed EEC but in reality the

SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EU

[Each word has a separate bulletin]

 it is only now in 2012 that YOUR GOVERNMENT is doing its utmost to destroy the COMMON LAW the last barrier against EU SLAVERY which the links with the past  which have until now protected the

"Rights and Liberties of Englishmen"

[As you will see below today in December of 2012 the same  just cause is again being fought under a present day 2015 (1215) flag of ENGLISH LIBERTY has been raised once again in our long history of our people in our historic ISLAND HOME in the fight to retain our long fought for INHERITED RIGHTS from almost 800 years ago.]

*

FIND OUT HOW YOUR PRO EU GOVERNMENT IS UNDERMINING THE ENGLISH COMMON LAW  TO CONVERT OUR LEGAL SYSTEM TO THE EU'S

Corpus Juris.