JULY FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017 - (1994 -Official Website -JUNE-2017 )-- JULY FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK

*

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

 

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017

*

JUNE 6-2017

[ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF D-DAY -JUNE 6-1944 -THE BREAKTHROUGH INTO NAZI-CONTROLLED EUROPE AND ITS LEGACY OF THE NAZI-PLANNED EU WHICH 17 MILLION UK CITIZENS ON JUNE 23-2016 VOTED FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR FREEDOM - CULTURE AND COUNTRY.

MILLIONS DIED IN TWO WORLD WARS TO PROTECT THE ENGLISH CULTURE AND ITS UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND ITS RETURN MUST BE SOONER THAN LATER!]

*

 

 

 

Montgomery’s Message to the troops on        

D. Day –June 6th 1944.

 

The voice of General Montgomery giving a stirring message to his troops before they set out was heard in the BBC war report last night. General Montgomery said:

 

“ The time has come to deal the enemy a terrific blow in Western Europe. The blow will be struck by the combined sea, land and air forces of the Allies, the whole constituting one great Allied team under the Supreme Command of General Eisenhower.

 

On the eve of this great adventure, I send my best wishes to every soldier in the Allied team. To us is given the honour to strike a blow for freedom, which will live in history, and in better days that lie ahead men will speak with pride of their doings.

 

We have a great a righteous cause. Let us pray that the Lord mighty in battle will go forward with our armies and that His special Providence will aid us in our struggle.

 

I want every soldier to know that I have complete confidence in the successful outcome of the operations we are now about to begin

 

With stout hearts and enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. 

 

Good luck to each of you. Good Hunting on the mainland of Europe.

 

*          *          *

 

This message was an inspiration to the troops at the time and it is still a stirring message at this time 60 years hence when our nation is in danger from the ‘Enemy Within’ and I’m sure those who love their country will remember the sacrifice of those taking part and that those that followed with the same spirit of freedom in their hearts will now join us to save our Country and Constitution- before it is too late!

 

And we conclude with a stirring message from General Montgomery in the early hours of D.Day  - June 6 – 1944.

To the troops and all taking part in the landings.

 

  To Win or Lose it All… ”

Click Here for Montgomery's message on Europe in 1962 -

 "I say we must not join Europe!"

 

TREASON -A CONSTITUTIONAL ANAYSIS By NORRIS McWHIRTER- 'Lest-we-forget'

 

 

 

 
ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE
 

by
 

ENOCH POWELL
---

(BIRMINGHAM BRANCH)

 

" England is the country of the English, he said.
England is a stage on which the drama of English history
was played and the setting within which the
English became conscious of themselves as people . . . .

when politicians and preachers attempt to frighten
and cajole the English into pretending away
the distinction between themselves and other nations and
other origins, they are engaged in undermining the
foundation upon which democratic government
by consent and peaceable civilized society in this
country are supplied"
 - 
Enoch Powell

 

 

Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty

 

Is with the English- speaking Peoples of the North Atlantic and Commonwealth, and our answer to those who prefer loss of Identity in an unaccountable, corrupt and godless European Police-State.

 

Thomas Jefferson, third President of the United States, once commented,’ A nation which seeks to trade its political independence for economic gain deserves to lose both’’. If she stays within the emerging European State, and continues to submit to government from Brussels, Britain will lose both her Prosperity and her Independence.

 

There is more prospect of prosperity and security for this country as a member of the North Atlantic Free Trade Area (NAFTA), in which Britain and her People would be able to trade world-wide, retain all ‘’Historic Rights’’, Principles and Privileges, and suffer no loss of National Independence.

 

Historically, Culturally and Politically, Britain has far more in common with the English-speaking Peoples of the North Atlantic and Commonwealth countries, who together have imparted to many nations the lesson of Liberty (which many of our European neighbours later in their history claimed but seem now to have forgotten the hard lesson that one must fight constantly to guard the Treasure of Liberty)   developed  the world’s oldest system of representative government, been the first to recognise inviolable and Fundamental Rights, and created judicial systems free from influence or interference by the State.

 

This profound Kinship, and the need to sustain it politically by separateness from Europe, was uppermost in the mind of Winston Churchill when , in his famous Zurich speech in September ,1946, envisioning a future union of the Continental states, he described Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations and ‘’mighty America ‘’as its prospective ’’friends and sponsors’’ offering support and help; and observed,

 

’’We are with Europe but not of it .

 We are linked, but not combined.

We are interested and associated, but not absorbed’’.

 

Because of Britain’s Unique global position , achievement as a Nation, and contribution to world history, the statement of William Pitt the Younger in 1805 (almost two-hundred years ago)  that England has saved herself by her exertions and Europe by her example’’ is an indication of her timeless role, so long as she is not decadent; and if she has become so, the present may be thought the time for the revival of her Beneficent Nationhood, rather than for it to be extinguished. (  see 101- Reasons )

 

‘’The Choose is yours!’’

 – make it soon, before it is

too late!

 

2003

 

Previous Speaker of the House of Commons-1976-83

 supports our

 Ancient Constitution

 

 The following letter was sent to This England by the late Viscount Tonypandy (Mr George Thomas) Speaker of the House of Commons

 

 Sir: Since I retired from the Speaker’s chair in the House of Commons in 1983, I have strictly adhered to our parliamentary tradition, which prevents former Speakers from being embroiled in party political controversies.

 

It is because I am convinced that the question of our national sovereignty towers above all that I feel free to submit this address to the electors of Britain.

 

Our Westminster Parliament is in danger of being denuded of its responsibilities, and of being supplanted by European assembly controlled by a hotchpotch of European politicians and bureaucrats, who have no love for this country. Our national destiny will be subject to foreign control.

 

In our British heritage a special place of honour is reserved for Pym and Hampden, who so courageously fought for the rights of our Parliament against the claims of absolutism by the Crown. Their portraits hang in pride in Speaker’s House, along with that of Speaker Lenthall who defended Parliament’s independence when it was challenged by Charles 1

 

Other parliamentary giants have followed in their wake. Names such as Palmerston and Pitt, Gladstone, Disraeli, Asquith, Lloyd George, Churchill, Attlee, and the like, shine in our history as fierce defenders of self-government by the British people.

 

They should be living in this hour, for we need support to protect our national interests from being subject to foreign control.

 

 No political party in Britain has a mandate from the electorate to surrender our national sovereignty to foreign hands.

 

The current slide towards a single European currency threatens both our economic and our political independence, and thus our sovereignty. Subterfuge and half-truths have been used to persuade the nation that neither our sovereignty nor our relationship with the Commonwealth is endangered.

 

There appears to be a conspiracy of silence about the fact that the United Kingdom’s trade and oversees investments are still much greater with countries outside the European Union than they are with those within the Union, which is itself increasingly a puppet of a French and German alliance.

 

It is not too late for us to save our sovereignty

 

For more than 600 years Speakers of the House of Commons have fiercely defended the supremacy of the Westminster Parliament. As one whose privilege it was to follow humbly in the steps of the mighty Speakers of the past, I call upon our nation to awake, and to demand that the voice of all our people shall be heard before the next inter-governmental conference takes irrevocable decisions affecting our sovereignty.

 

A national Referendum conducted before, and not after, further decisions are taken is our democratic right.

 

This is the only sure way to prevent our parliamentary sovereignty, our judicial system and our Commonwealth relationships from being grievously undermined.

 

*          *          *

 

We believe that Lord Tonypandy would support our cause at this momentous time for our nation when the people will at last have their say after they have been honestly given the true facts of the dangers to the Constitution, Freedom and Independence of our Country.

2004

 

 

THERE WAS NO REFERENDUM UNTIL

 

 

 

AFTER MANY PROMISES FROM BLAIR AND CAMERON WHO FINALLY DECIDED THE EU RELATIONSHIP WAS SAFE HE CALLED A REFERENDUM ON JUNE 23-2016 AND WAS IGNOMINIOUSLY BEATEN THOUGH BY A SMALLER MAJORITY THAN WE HAD EXPECTED. BUT AS THE BBC - BRUSSELS BROADCASTING CORPORATION AND POLITICAL  AND EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENT  AND TRADE UNIONS AND MUCH BRIBED BUSINESS  AND CORPORATIONS WERE RELUCTANT TO GIVE UP THEIR REGULAR ' PIECES OF SILVER' .  AS WE ALL KNOW IT WAS THE PLAIN MAN-THE COMMON MAN-THE MAN-IN-THE-STREET OF THE SHIRES OF ENGLAND WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CENTRAL BLOT ON THE LANDSCAPE-WARWICK-WITH THEIR MAJORITY OF EU BACKERS    WHEREAS  ELSEWHERE IN ENGLAND THE MAJORITY STOOD FIRM FOR THEIR ACCUSTOMED FREEDOM-THEIR CULTURE-THEIR UNIQUE PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY AND CONSTITUTION.. AND IN A FEW WORDS-

THEY LOVED THEIR COUNTRY.

VICTORY
OUR INSPIRATION SINCE VOTING NO! AT THE 1975 REFERENDUM- CONTESTING THE GENERAL ELECTION IN 1997 AND THE EUROPEAN ELECTION IN 1999 AND STILL AT OUR POST TODAY JUNE 6-2017

VICTORY  You ask, What is our aim? I can answer in one word: victory-victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival- WINSTON CHURCHILL.

May 1940

 

 

A WARNING MANY OF YOU IGNORED ON JUNE 23-2016

 

Harry Beckhough's

Germany's Four Reich's

PART 1  Germanised Empire in the Making  PART 2 -The New Beginning   

PART 3 -The Third Reich    PART 4 -The Taskmaster of Europe                 

*

 

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

 

In 1962,

 Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality 

HITLER'S plan for Europe

 under

 GERMAN CONTROL.

  1086  

1136

677

24

1137

1042

B56

C34

B103

1121

C30

C33

*

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

JUJUST A FEW OF THE THOUSANDS OF BULLETINS ON THE EU SINCE 2003

 
 

 

WHY ARE WE STILL WAITING

FOR

BREXIT?

 

JUNE 23- 2016 - JUNE 23-2017

 

JULY

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

1

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

AUG

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

2

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

SEPT

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

3

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

OCT

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

4

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

NOV

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

5

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

DEC

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

6

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

JAN

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

7

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

*

 

FEB

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

8

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

MARCH

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

9

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

APRIL

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

10

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

MAY

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

11

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

JUNEV

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

12

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

JULY

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

13

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

AUG

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

14

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

JUNE 7-2017

JUNE 23-2017

'The Longest Day'
D-DAY, 6th June 1944.

AND AGAIN

ON

JUNE 23-2016.

WHEN ONCE AGAIN WE MUST DEFEAT HITLER'S PLAN BY

LEAVING THE EU

[NOT EUROPE]

AND RECOVER WHAT MILLIONS OF OUR SOLDIERS-SAILORS AND AIRMEN AND PEOPLE FOUGHT TO PROTECT IN 1914 AND AGAIN IN 1939.

 

WHAT WE SAID ON 6TH JUNE 2004
 

To some of us it seems only yesterday when those countless warriors for Freedom left our shores to fight to Free the peoples of a war torn Europe.

Many of those taking part were from the other parts of the English Speaking World the Commonwealth and other nation states that joined the Free World to fight the tripartite evil of State Dominance of Peoples, which is shortly again to be upon us in the form of the new European Constitution.

For those returning to the battle fields of Europe it must be in their minds as to how after all that had taken place 60 years ago that the one Nation that faced the terror almost alone -a unique Democracy an example to the world from which seed of Freedom rose, those Free Independent Nations States throughout the world during the past three centuries, is now fighting for its survival from traitors within.

Today our nation is now itself in peril from a doctrine alien to its nature but well known across our moat of history for it's emphasis on order by the State rather than our centuries old lesson that the State is our servant - not our master.

There is an awakening taking place of the dangers to our way-of-life but whether it will be in time to save us in the short time we remain a truly Free Nation State only the People can decide.

On June 6th 2004 all our thoughts will be with those who lost loved ones and those that suffered at home and abroad to bring Peace and Prosperity back to a war weary world. May we escape the present evil, which threatens to enslave our People and Country- God Save Our Queen!

May God save our Queen and our Country?
 

WE ASK! IN JUNE 2016 WHAT HAVE YOU DONE! TO PREVENT OUR UNIQUE AND ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE FROM BECOMING  REGIONS OF THE 1943 NAZI-PLANNED EUROPEAN UNION?

 

6th June,2004
 

 

 

 

 

Wobble or not, Theresa is the only show in town even if I don't believe she will deliver the tungsten-tipped

BREXIT

[ON JUNE 8-2017]

I want,

writes

 

Nine days to go and, finally, the Tories announce they intend to concentrate on Brexit for the rest of the campaign. Hallelujah!

To be honest, after taking a short break for an election detox, I had hoped it would be all over bar the shouting by now. Sadly not. There's still more than a week of this patronising nonsense until we actually get the chance to cast our votes.

On the day Mother Theresa decided she would go to the country, I warned that a campaign lasting the best part of two months had the potential to go pear-shaped. Events, dear lady, events, as Harold Macmillan almost said.

No one could have predicted the awful atrocity in Manchester. But even before the bomber struck to such evil and devastating effect, things were starting to unravel. Boredom and irritation set in long ago, as the politicking expanded to fill the time available in the 24-hour news cycle.

An election supposedly about Britain leaving the EU has inevitably become about anything but. The nadir was reached the day after my last column, when the Green Party staged a rally against 'Period Poverty', attracting widespread coverage on the rolling news channels and in the anti-Tory Press.

At first, I thought period poverty might be something to do with Poldark.

Turns out it was a protest against VAT on sanitary products. A noble enough cause, but what the hell has the price of tampons got to do with Brexit?

Quite a lot, apparently. VAT is imposed on sanitary products by an EU edict. So you might have thought the Greens would be all in favour of Britain breaking free of the Brussels yoke. Nothing could be further from the truth.

They want to derail

Brexit

and keep us in the EU — tampon tax and all, presumably.

Go figure, as our American cousins say.

This was just one daft diversion from the central purpose of calling the election. Some of the others, such as the furore over the so-called 'dementia tax' (which is nothing of the sort) have proven to be more serious.

If Mother Theresa is in trouble in the latest polls, she has only herself to blame. This should have been a short, sharp election focused on a single, defining issue.

It should have been held on the same day as the local elections in early May and would have resulted in a decisive victory for the Tories.

By now, she would be the unassailable mistress of all she surveyed and Britain's future independence would be assured. Instead, it has dragged on, and on, and on, with every new day bringing another pointless policy initiative, giving her opponents a new line of attack.

Yesterday, for instance, the deeply unimpressive Home Secretary Amber Rudd was doing the rounds on radio and TV.

The presenters all wanted to question her about the failure of so-called control orders to stop known terrorist suspects from operating with impunity.

Instead, they were forced to ask her first about a new initiative on domestic violence — obviously at the insistence of her media handlers. Admittedly, domestic violence, like VAT on tampons, is a legitimate subject for debate. But neither is what this election is supposed to be about, for heaven's sake.

Hubris took over, bolstered by initial predictions of a three-figure majority. Theresa was running round Wembley with the cup before a ball had been kicked.

Frankly, I've never believed the polls and always thought the Tories would be happy with any kind of majority approaching 50.

That's still achievable, but time is at a premium. It's no secret that I'm not a paid-up member of the Theresa May fan club, but I do intend to vote for her next week.

She's the only show in town, even if I have little confidence in her delivering the kind of tungsten-tipped Brexit I want. Most people I know feel much the same. She's the 'Who Else Is There?' candidate.

The Conservative Party isn't exactly brimming with talent, but anyone who seriously thinks Labour is a credible government in waiting should be sectioned.

You don't need me to reiterate the shocking unsuitability of the terrorist-loving Trots in the Corbynista cabal, especially in the wake of the Manchester attack. OK, so there's been a Tory wobble. Good. Wobbles concentrate the mind at this stage in an election campaign.

Don't read too much into Labour's apparent resurgence, either. Back in 1987, I spent a month on Neil Kinnock's election battle bus. As polling day approached, a couple of rogue polls suggested Labour was going to win and the Conservatives went into a blind panic.

Glenys Kinnock started mentally measuring up the curtains at No 10. On election night, I stood outside the Welsh Windbag's constituency home as the BBC's Vincent Hanna marched up to the front door bearing an exit poll which pointed to a Labour majority. We could hear the cheering coming from within.

Lovely, tidy, smashing.


 

A couple of hours later, after the count, I watched Kinnochio slump away as the realisation dawned that the Tories had romped home by 102 seats.

The smell of stale chip fat hung in the air, a poignant olfactory requiem for his abject failure.

Oh dear, how sad, never mind.

It's now up to Theresa to get back on track, to show real leadership, to ignore the squabbling, wobbling munchkins in her private office, and remember why she called this election in the first place.

 

She told us

 Brexit means Brexit

and the only — repeat, only — reason for calling an election two short years after the last one was to give her a mandate to get on with it. If she really intends to be true to her word, she is entitled to our support next week and will deserve our long-term gratitude if she pulls it off. We shall just have to take her on trust.

More than 17 million people voted

Leave.

We've got no choice other than to give her a solid mandate to turn that decision into reality. The alternative is too horrible to contemplate.

Despite the fevered speculation surrounding the latest polls, I fully expect her to be returned to Downing Street with an increased majority. 

Just so long as it doesn't go to her head and she can resist the temptation to call another election over the next five years.

*
 

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4553500/Wobble-not-Theresa-town.html#ixzz4iZA2OBHe
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MAY 30-2017

H F 644

JUNE 8-2017

 

THE DAY POLITICS CHANGED WITH A PLAIN PEOPLE'S REVOLUTION - A DAY TO REMEMBER!

 

JUNE 9-2017

Details to follow shortly

*  *  *

 

FREEDOM OR FOREIGN DOMINATION

PROGRESS OR PLUNDER-

THAT IS YOUR CHOICE!

ON

JUNE 8-2017

 

For the sake of Mrs May the mandate she needs to keep us safe-and give us BREXIT

JUNE 8-2017

 

DAILY MAIL COMMENT- JUNE 7-2017

 

*

 

LITTLEJOHN

Richard Littlejohn for the Daily Mail | Daily Mail Online

I'm sick of politicians pussy footing around.

AS THEY WON'T SAY IT, I WILL-

WE ARE AT WAR

 

 
 

The homicidal maniacs who slaughtered seven people and wounded dozens more were determined the world would be left in no doubt about their motivation.

'This is for Allah,' they screamed as they plunged their knives into young men and women during a terrifying spree of indiscriminate carnage. It was the third in a series of devastating attacks by Islamist fanatics on British soil in recent weeks, all of which have claimed innocent lives in the name of the Prophet.

Yet the Prime Minister was at pains to assure us yesterday that there was no connection between these deadly acts of mass murder. She did concede, however, that: 'They are bound together by the single evil ideology of Islamist extremism that preaches hatred, sows division and promotes sectarianism

That's a start, at least. Normally, in the wake of such atrocities, we are treated to the tired mantra that they are 'nothing to do with Islam'.

Indeed, after the Manchester massacre, that city's calculating, two-bob chancer of a mayor Andy Burnham even tried to insist that the suicide-bomber 'wasn't a Muslim' — which would have come as a great surprise to him (before he blew himself up), his extended terror network, his family and everyone else who knew him down his local mosque.

Theresa May didn't go that far. But she did feel it necessary to state that the killers subscribed to 'an ideology that is a perversion of Islam and a perversion of the truth'. How does she know it's a perversion? She's the daughter of an Anglican clergyman, not an Islamic scholar. Does she think the Saudi predilection for chopping off heads, or the popular Pakistani sport of stoning to death women accused of adultery are perversions of the religion of peace, too?

Sorry, but if someone says they want to kill me on behalf of 'Allah' then I'm prepared to take his word for it.

There are multiple interpretations of the Koran. It's not our job to decide which one is correct, simply to deal ruthlessly with any manifestation of Islam which wants to bring bloody mayhem to our streets.

That's not in any shape or form to suggest that the vast majority of Muslims in Britain support the terrorists. But it is incontestable that the terrorists are all Muslims who quote the Koran to justify their deranged war against those they consider to be filthy 'infidels' — i.e.: anyone who fails to subscribe to their fundamentalist beliefs.

Plenty of Muslims disagree, but who are we to adjudicate on the correct interpretation of Islam? So devout are these bloodthirsty fanatics in their adherence to the Koran that they genuinely believe they will get their reward in paradise.

Why rot in a dead-end Didsbury council flat when 72 virgins await you in the after-life? They're not going to be deterred by

Mrs May telling them they're not proper Muslims.

 I would have preferred to see a few prominent Muslim clerics giving press conferences condemning the slaughter committed in the name of their faith.

Where was the Grand Mufti of Regent's Park, or the Ayatollah of Whitechapel yesterday? Surely, they would carry more authority than the infidel whore May if they stated categorically that anyone who murdered in the name of the Koran would burn in hell — not spend eternity in a celestial version of the Bada Bing, the lap-dancing bar in The Sopranos.

Yet, mostly, they stay silent. And because the British authorities are scared stiff of upsetting 'moderate' Muslims, our response to genuine extremism is equivocal.

The political class must shoulder the blame for allowing murderous Islamism to establish deep roots in Britain, with utterly predictable consequences.

As I wrote after the attack on Westminster in March: 'Every time there is a terrorist atrocity, either here or abroad, the politicians go through the same old motions, mouthing platitudes about never surrendering to evil. But by their actions they betray their hollow rhetoric and the rest of us have to live with the consequences.

[THIS - EVEN THOUGH OVER THE YEARS MUSLIM CLERICS HAVE CALLED ON THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE FIRM POSITIVE ACTION-BUT THEY DECLINED TO DO SO. -IT'S THE VOTES!-DID YOU KNOW?]
 

They have encouraged the pernicious doctrine of 'multiculturalism' — which is just a fancy word for apartheid and has created vast, monocultural Muslim ghettoes in our great cities . . .

'The politicians have opened the floodgates to mass immigration without insisting on integration. They pretend that every culture, no matter how medieval and barbaric, is worthy of equal respect.

'They permitted foreign hate-preachers from intolerant theocracies to set up shop here, peddling their doctrine of violence and division.

'In pursuit of votes, they are in thrall to self-appointed 'community leaders' who take our money but reject our freedoms. As a result, it is possible to spend your entire life here without ever subscribing to a single one of our traditional values, such as tolerance of those with different religious beliefs. Many young Muslims grow up hating the country which gave them everything.

Over the past couple of decades, politicians have turned Britain into a safe haven for terrorists from all over the world. As a result, it's no longer safe to walk over a bridge in our capital city without running the risk of being mown down by an Islamist terrorist in a rented Hyundai . . .

'Smug, craven politicians, in thrall to notions of 'diversity' . . . sowed the seeds of the terrorism we are now reaping.'

Forgive me for repeating that verbatim, but I can't think of a better way of putting it.

Consider this. On the other side of the Thames from London Bridge station lies the Islamic Republic of Tower Hamlets — a virtual Muslim monoculture.

It is possible to grow up in inner city areas just like this without ever having to be sullied by the 'British values' the politicians pretend to promote.

Yesterday, police investigating the latest attack raided a block of flats a few miles further east in Barking.

We are told they left 'women in burkas in tears'.

Oh dear, how sad, never mind. There are more burkas in Barking than in Bangladesh these days.

Anyone who objects to women walking the streets clad in head-to-toe sackcloth with only slits for their eyes is smeared as a 'racist' or an 'Islamophobe'.

But how are these women ever going to embrace 'British values'? Their costume is a deliberate rejection of British values. It says: 'We are not part of your society and never will be.'

In areas like this, where television comes via satellite from the Middle East, fundamentalism is allowed, nay encouraged, to flourish.

Here, impressionable young men can have their minds polluted by hatred disseminated over the internet.

Police patrol Twitter for 'hate crimes' such as 'homophobia' but ignore entreaties to mass murder. Similarly, the authorities expend more effort stopping football hooligans travelling abroad to England away games than preventing wannabe jihadists heading to Syria to fight alongside Islamic State — or returning here to bring death to the streets of Britain.hat's not to criticise the police or the security services who are doi

That's not to criticise the police or the security services who are doing a fantastic job in the circumstances and have foiled an impressive number of plots.

Rather than address the root causes of terror, the politicians are content to send the police into the front line — a task to which they rose with exemplary bravery on Saturday night.

Armed officers shot dead the three terrorists before the death toll could multiply.

But it is worth remembering that Jeremy Corbyn, the man who would be Prime Minister, is viscerally opposed to any shoot-to-kill policy. How can we take him seriously on national security?

Corbyn thought Osama Bin Laden should have been arrested and read his rights, and counts Islamic terror organisations such as Hamas and Hezbollah as his 'friends'. He even tried to blame Manchester on Britain's foreign policy.

If Corbyn had been running COBRA this week, those brave firearms officers could have found themselves up on a murder charge. This is the kind of political obstructionism which hampers the work of those who strain every sinew to keep us safe.

That's not to criticise the police or the security services who are doing a fantastic job in the circumstances and have foiled an impressive number of plots.

Rather than address the root causes of terror, the politicians are content to send the police into the front line — a task to which they rose with exemplary bravery on Saturday night.

Armed officers shot dead the three terrorists before the death toll could multiply.

But it is worth remembering that Jeremy Corbyn, the man who would be Prime Minister, is viscerally opposed to any shoot-to-kill policy. How can we take him seriously on national security?

Corbyn thought Osama Bin Laden should have been arrested and read his rights, and counts Islamic terror organisations such as Hamas and Hezbollah as his 'friends'. He even tried to blame Manchester on Britain's foreign policy.

If Corbyn had been running COBRA this week, those brave firearms officers could have found themselves up on a murder charge. This is the kind of political obstructionism which hampers the work of those who strain every sinew to keep us safe.

That sanctimonious creep Nick Clegg was all over the media yesterday, wringing his hands for the London Bridge victims. But as Deputy Prime Minister, he scuppered serious control orders for terror suspects because he was worried it would breach their precious 'yuman rites'.

London's mayor Sadiq Khan, who makes Andy Burnham look like Rudy Giuliani, claimed that London is the safest city in the world, even while the body-count was rising. With complacency like that, what chance have we got?

Theresa May looked and sounded the part yesterday, but we've heard it all before — not just after 9/11, 7/7, Paris, Nice, Brussels, Westminster etc, but after Manchester, too.


 

At least she doesn't shy away from identifying the threat as 'Islamist' — an accurate expression which got Ukip leader Paul Nuttall howled down on TV last week.

I can remember writing after 9/11 that we were at war. It may not be a conventional war, but it's a war nonetheless.

It's a war of attrition which the terrorists are winning, disrupting our daily routines and freedom of movement and forcing us to curtail our own civil liberties.

And it will be a war without end unless the politicians stop pussyfooting around and face up to the enemy within.

Marching a few soldiers halfway up Downing Street and back again, like the Grand Old Duke of York, isn't going to bring victory.

Instead of reacting after the event, the police and security services should be given extensive emergency powers to round up known terror suspects; to expel foreign preachers of hate; to shut down extremist mosques; to disrupt and disable Islamist websites; to face down self-appointed 'community' leaders and their useful idiots; and to arrest anyone returning from Syria and imprison them for the duration.

Maybe it is time to arm the police as a matter of routine, provided we also give them absolute immunity when they are forced to use their weapons to protect life — rather than hanging them out to dry to appease the 'community'.

Firearms officers responded with commendable speed on Saturday, but if there had been armed bobbies on foot patrol at Borough Market, the attack might have been foiled earlier.

We should bring back the crime of treason for any British citizen taking part in terrorism at home or fighting with the enemy abroad. Fine, empty words and floral tributes, however well intended, are futile — and seen by the terrorists as signs of decadence and terminal weakness.

Theresa May says, finally, things have got to change. Enough is enough. Let's hope that this time she actually means it.

Politicians can't keep treating innocent men, women and children as cannon fodder to be slaughtered by knife-wielding Islamist maniacs and suicide-bombers screaming:

'This is for Allah.'

*  *  *

Full article

Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4571882/We-war-writes-RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN.html#ixzz4j7klrma9
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE

JULY-2006

*

MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

JUNE-2006

*

ZEALOTS IN OUR MIDST

APRIL 2004

*

MULTICULTURAL POLICIES HAVE EFFECTIVELY DIVIDED THE POPULATION INTO ETHNIC AND FAITH COMMUNITIES-

JANUARY-2007

*

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION-NOVEMBER-2006

*

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

[MUSLIMS WHO WILL NOT INTEGRATE AND POLICE THEIR OWN-ARE THE ENEMY WITHIN.]

JUNE 5-2017

A

NATIONAL EMERGENCY!

WHICH ALL POLITICIANS CAN NO LONGER IGNORE.

THERE NEEDS TO BE AN ALL-PARTY COMMITTEE TO DEAL WITH THIS OUT-OF-CONTROL DEMOGRAPHIC DISASTER.

BROUGHT ABOUT BY UNSCRUPULOUS POLITICIANS

IN ORDER TO GAIN THEIR ADVANTAGE

AND IT IS THE GENERAL POPULATION WHO WILL SUFFER THE DIRE CONSEQUENCES OF POSSIBLY

 A CIVIL WAR IN THE NOT TOO DISTANT FUTURE.

ACTION NOW!-PEACE SECURED.

 

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1213 ENGLISH WAYS NOT ISLAMIC IN ENGLAND.

 
July 19, 2016

 

A MATTER OF FACT

 

5 facts about the Muslim population in Europe

Recent killings in Paris as well as the arrival of hundreds of thousands of mostly Muslim refugees in Europe have drawn renewed attention to the continent’s Muslim population. In many European countries, including France, Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, concerns about growing Muslim communities have led to calls for restrictions on immigration. But just how large is Europe’s Muslim population, and how fast is it growing?

Muslim population in EuropeUsing the Pew Research Center’s most recent population estimates, here are five facts about the size and makeup of the Muslim population in Europe:

1Germany and France have the largest Muslim populations among European Union member countries. As of 2010, there were 4.8 million Muslims in Germany (5.8% of the country’s population) and 4.7 million Muslims in France (7.5%). In Europe overall, however, Russia’s population of 14 million Muslims (10%) is the largest on the continent.

2The Muslim share of Europe’s total population has been increasing steadily. In recent decades, the Muslim share of the population throughout Europe grew about 1 percentage point a decade, from 4% in 1990 to 6% in 2010. This pattern is expected to continue through 2030, when Muslims are projected to make up 8% of Europe’s population.

3Muslims are younger than other Europeans. In 2010, the median age of Muslims throughout Europe was 32, eight years younger than the median for all Europeans (40). By contrast, the median age of religiously unaffiliated people in Europe, including atheists, agnostics and those with no religion in particular, was 37. The median age of European Christians was 42.

4Views of Muslims vary widely across European countries. A Pew Research Center survey conducted this spring in 10 nations found that in eastern and southern Europe, negative views prevailed. However, the majority of respondents in the UK, Germany, France, Sweden and the Netherlands gave Muslims a favorable rating. Views about Muslims are tied to ideology. While 47% of Germans on the political right give Muslims an unfavorable rating, just 17% on the left do so. The gap between left and right is also roughly 30 percentage points in Italy and Greece. 

5As of 2010, the European Union was home to about 13 million Muslim immigrants. The foreign-born Muslim population in Germany is primarily made up of Turkish immigrants, but also includes many born in Kosovo, Iraq, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Morocco. The roughly 3 million foreign-born Muslims in France are largely from France’s former colonies of Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia.

Note: This is an update of a post originally published on Jan. 15, 2015. 

Category: 5 Facts

Topics: Europe, Muslims and Islam

  1. Photo of Conrad Hackett
    is a demographer focusing on religion at Pew Research Center.

509 Comments

*  *  *

 

AND

AN ENEMY WITHIN

THE GREATEST THREAT TO OUR SECURITY AND CULTURE IS FROM WITHIN BECAUSE OF THE ILLEGAL ACTIONS OF SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS IN FOREIGN POLICY AND MASS IMMIGRATION WHICH HAS BROUGHT WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY A CORE OF RADICAL MUSLIMS WHO HAVE BUT ONE AIM TO INFILTRATE OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THEIR AIM TO BRING A MUSLIM STATE TO ENGLAND.

1+2+3+4+5

 

MUSLIM GROUP CALLS FOR THEE ISLAMIC STATES WITHIN THE UK

by Robin Phillips

Islamic extremists are calling  for three independent states to be established within the UK.

If the plans are accepted, the Yorkshire towns of Bradford and Dewsbury as well as the East London town of Tower Hamlets would become autonomous ISLAMIC entities operating outside the British legal system.

The proposals were put forward by the

 MUSLIMS AGAINST the CRUSADES (MAC)

a group that was set up last year and is led by the extremist Abu Assadullah

The towns singled out by the group are already hotbeds of Islamic radicalism. Dewsbury was home to LONDON 7/7 bomber Mohammad Sidique Khan. In 2007 There were allegations that Muslims in Dewsbury were operating an Islamic court illegally out of a school. Last year the council of Tower Hamlets was accused of having been taken over by a MUSLIM extremist group.

the MAC group, who burned poppies during the REMEMBRANCE DAY silence, have  written on their website, " We suggest it is time that the areas with large MUSLIM population declare an emirate delineating that MUSLIMS trying to live within this area  are trying to live by SHARIA [LAW]   as much as possible with their own courts and community watch and schools and even self sufficient trade.

" Likely areas for these projects might be Dewsbury or Bradford or Tower Hamlets to begin with."

" In time we can envisage that the whole of the SHARIA might one day be implemented starting with these enclaves,"

Ian Greenwood, who leads the Bradford Council, said people would " not allow extremists to provoke them into violence".

[WHAT A MISCHIEVOUS AND NONSENSICAL REPLY so typical to avoid facing facts so common with the politically correct local  and Central Government officials who will not face the FACTS that the MUSLIM population is growing at an advantage of 4-1 and will in only a few decades be the prominent faith in many parts of ENGLAND.  Already a number of towns and cities have over 40/50% presence. The fact is that they are no doubt  that they are a FIFTH COLUMN within our country. AS we have seen apart from a few IMAMS regretting the murder of a soldier on our streets and the general Muslim population keep their heads down and we can be sure many of them are praying every day that once CHRISTIAN ENGLAND will soon be THEIR ISLAMIC STATE. As we have said for a number of years their should have been a restriction put on the number of Muslims permitted to live in ENGLAND because of the very dangers we see ourselves in today in January 2014.  One must remember that in Islamic countries they have very severe penalties against their own people apart from the way they deal with those of the Christian Faith within their borders.  The reality is that the ardent severe Islamic Faith cannot coexist within a FREE SECULAR STATE because it is alien to its own RELIGIOUS LAW.]

IT IS AN ENEMY WITHIN

JANUARY-2014

*

IN JUNE2017

IN JUNE 2017 WE CAN SEE THAT THAT OUR POLITICALLY-CORRECT POLITICIANS AND THEIR VOTE MANIA-WHATEVER THE AFFECT TO OUR FREEDOM -CULTURE-CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY. WE ARE AS LAMBS TO THE SLAUGHTER AND THE GREATER NUMBER OF MUSLIMS IN OUR MIDST KNOWING AS SHOWN ABOVE OUR TOLERANCE-THE GREATEST IN EUROPE-POSSIBLY ALSO IN THE REST OF THE NON-MUSLIM WORLD. WILL NOT POLICE THEIR FUNDAMENTALISTS WHEN THEY KNOW THAT THEY WILL BENEFIT BY THE WEAKNESS OF GOVERNMENT MEASURES WHICH WILL BRING FORTH THEIR BELOVED SHARIA LAW AND ISLAMIC STATE.   THERESA MAY AS A CHRISTIAN KNOWS NO DOUBT THE TRUTH OF THE THREAT TO THE SOUL AND CROSS OF OUR CENTURIES LONG CHRISTIAN FAITH INTRODUCED INTO OUR ISLAND HOME IN 597 BY A CHRISTIAN MISSION CONVERTED KENT, ONE OF THE KINGDOMS WHICH HAD ARISEN OUT OF THE CHAOS, AND SOON AFTERWARDS NORTHUMBRIA BECAME CHRISTIAN UNDER IRISH INFLUENCE- IN THE SAME YEAR AUGUSTINE ROMAN CHRISTIANITY) AND HIS COMPANIONS LANDED IN KENT TO ATTEMPT THE CONVERSION OF SAXON ENGLAND AND THE ROYAL HOUSE OF EGBERT (802-24) AND ALFRED-CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH (871-901)]

 

CHRISTIAN FAITH

'He that  is not with me is against me.'  N.T., Matthew, xii, 30

CHRISTIAN FAITH- FREEDOMS HEART AND SOUL

Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ has made us free.-N.T.Galations, v,1.

*

THOSE WHO INVADED ISLAMIC LANDS

'Served the creature more than the Creator.- N.T.,  Romans, i,25.Acts

*

POLITICAL WILL

'The end is not yet.'- N. T.., Matthew xxiv,6

*

FAILURE

 'We have made a covenant with death.-' O.T., Isaiah,xxviii,15.

'If a house is divided against itself-the house cannot stand' N.T., Mark,iii.25.

PSALM CXXV!! -Nisi Dominus

 

EXCEPT the Lord  |  build this house: their labour | is but | lost that build it....

In the Psalms was laid the coping -stone of American independence.  In 1787, it was to the Ist verse of  the above psalm that Benjamin Franklin appealed, when speaking before the Convention assembled to frame a Constitution for the United States of America:-

" In the beginning of the contest with Britain, when we were sensible of danger, we had daily prayers in this room for the Divine protection.    Our prayers, Sir, were heard, and they were graciously answered. All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a superintending Providence. To that kind of providence  we owe this opportunity of consulting in peace on the means of establishing our future national felicity We owe this and we have we now forgotten this powerful friend? or do we imagine we no longer need HIS assistance?   I have lived for a long time (81 years), and the longer I live the more convincing proof I see of this truth  , that God governs in the affairs of men.  And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without HIS notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without HIS aid? WE have been assured, Sir, in  the sacred writings, that 'Except the Lord  build the house they labour in vein that hold it.'I firmly believe this, and I also believe that without His concurring aid we shall proceed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel.  I therefore beg leave to move that, henceforth, prayers, imploring the assistance of Heaven and its blessing on our deliberations, be held in this assembly every morning before we proceed to business, and that one or more of the clergy of this city be requested to officiate in that service."

THE PSALMS IN HUMAN LIFE by LORD ERNLE (ROWLAND E. PROTHERO-1903)

[This practice is no longer a part of our English political system which must explain why our Nation has been not only become GODLESS but also WICKED as events have proved over the past decades.  Following a CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE would have prevented the EVILS which have corrupted our GOVERNMENT and SOCIETY.]

A MAN CALLED PETER-THE STORY Of PETER MARSHALL

*

A SCOTSMAN WHO FILLED THE  CHAPLAINCY OF THE SENATE OF  THE USA.

 

We intend to show excepts from the book 'Compellingly told by much loved author Catherine Marshal -this is the story of her first husband Peter Marshall. It is an irresistible account of the love between a dynamic man and his GOD and the tender love between a husband and wife.

The life of Peter Marshall -'the story that had to be told'-recounts the triumph of a young Scottish immigrant who made his way from his homeland to the chaplaincy of the United States Senate.

Catherine's and Peter's life together in the hall's of highest human happiness', as Peter often referred to marriage, is related with love humour and immense wisdom.

'The best stories are those that really happen. None of the novels...written during the last few years touches the heart and appeals to the mind in the way that Catherine Marshall does in telling the story of her husbands life.'

Catherine Marshall was the author of numerous bestselling books, including Christy, Julie. The Helper, Beyond Our Selves and A Closer Walk.

The book A Man Called PETER has sold 2,000,000 copies

Hodder and Stoughton Ltd

338 Euston Road

London NWI 3 BH

1951

*

 

 

We commence our brief search of the life of a 

 A MAN CALLED PETER

with the Preface of the Book

Since Peter Marshall left us to be at home in our Father's house, I have often dreamed of him. But one dream was different from all the rest. It had the feel of reality about it

I dreamed that I was allowed to visit Peter briefly, to see him in his new setting. I found him working in a rose garden, surrounded by those perfect hybrid tea roses he always wanted to grow

.After a while, he said playfully, "I know perfectly well what you've been doing, Catherine. You're writing a book. Now, now  -no exposes! What you're doing to me shouldn't happen to a dog!"

Then in a more serious vein, "It's all right, Kate. Go ahead and write it. Tell it all, if it will prove to people that a man can love the Lord and not be a sissy..."

So, in the months since then I have written it. reliving and recording parts of the life that Peter and I shared has a joyous task. The presence of Christ has shed glory on even the hard-to-bear parts of it.

I hope that you will enjoy it, and that by the time you have come to the last page [332p], you will know that if God can do so much for a man called Peter, he can do as much for YOU .

C.M

Washington, D.C.

April 29, 1951.

 

[As we have stated we shall be revealing extracts of the publication and have decided to generally restrict our recording to just three of the 20 chapters in the book which is of 332 pages.]

 

Before we commence our journey of the life of a Man called Peter we wish to explain that it was a recent showing of the Fact-based drama

A MAN CALLED PETER

ON

FILM4

 

 

 

which prompted this mission into the life of a Man of God.

The distinguished actor portraying Peter Marshal is Richard Todd of The Dambusters and The Longest Day and many other fine films since the Second World . He was himself fighting at Pegasus Bridge a vital objective on D Day June 6-1944.

*

 

Chapter One

 

ABOVE TIME AND CIRCUMSTANCE

 

 

For ye shall go out with joy...and it shall be to the Lord for a name, for an everlasting sign that shall not be cut off. Isaiah 55:12-13

The morning was bleak and cold. A damp penetrating wind ruffled the steel-gray waters of the Potomac, chased bits of paper and debris down the broad roped- off expanse of Pennsylvania Avenue, and whistled around the dome of the Capital.

Everywhere Washington wore an air of expectancy. The hillocks of lumber, which had been piled for weeks along the Avenue, had finally been fashioned into grandstand and bleachers.  Every street corner was garnished with a navy blue of District policemen. The gray lampposts were decorated with small American flags and pictures of Truman and Barkley. Red, white, and blue bunting was everywhere.  In a few hours, forty thousand marchers and more than forty floats would form a column seven miles long in honour of the

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

It was Inauguration Day , January 20, 1949.

Before the stately Capital building with it's wide-spreading wings, I sat with 120,000 other people on crudely  built benches watching the dignitaries taking their places on the special platform before us.

Radio, television, and motion -picture technicians scurried up and down their newly built platforms, adjusting and testing equipment. At twelve noon, the eyes and ears of most Americans would be centered on this scene.

I knew that in the old Senate Chamber, with it's plum-coloured leather seats and green-carpeted aisles, Peter Marshall, the Senate Chaplain, called by many a reporter the

"Conscience of the Senate"

was at that moment praying. His simple, sincere, down- to - earth prayers had been having an increasing profound effect on the Senators. But it was an intimate thing - not the kind of thing a man talks about readily.

 

I could picture the scene, as I had often seen it -the sudden hush, the way the men reverently dropped their heads as Peter prayed:

'God of our fathers in Whom we trust and by Whose guidance and grace this nation was born, bless the Senators of these United States at this important time in our history and give all things needful to the faithful discharge of their responsibilities.

We pray especially today for our President, and also for him who will preside over this chamber.

Give to them good health for the physical strains of their office, good judgment for the decisions they must make, wisdom beyond their own, and clear understanding for the problems of this difficult hour.

We thank Thee for their humble reliance upon Thee. May they go often to the throne of grace as we commend them both to Thy loving care and Thy guiding hand.

 Through Jesus Christ our Lord. AMEN.

Soon I spied Peter marching, hat in hand, with the Senators, into the seats provided for them to the left of the Inaugural stand.  he was between Senator Lucas and Senator Vandenberg. The expression on his face suggested he was particularly pleased about something.

From where I was sitting, I could see Peter and the Senators well enough to guess that much quiet camaraderie was going on in that section of the stand.

Peter had been Chaplain of the Senate for two years. he had not sought the job, nor wanted it at first.  In the beginning he had found it hard to believe that the Senators regarded his opening prayer as more than a necessary gesture.

Time and closer acquaintance between him and the men had changed that. The Senators were men of the world, not easily impressed with preachers. Yet Peter had earned their respect and the deep affection of the members on both sides of the aisle.

Elected by a Republican majority in 1947, he had been unanimously re-elected by the Democrats on December 31, 1948. On that day, Peter had telephoned me from the church office to tell me the news.  There was exultation in his voice.

"I'm glad, Catherine. At least it shows I convinced them that I have no politics."

The affection the Senators felt for their chaplain was reflected in the way Senator Arthur Vandenberg, who presided as president pro tempore of the Senate in the absence of the vice-[president, always called Peter "Dominie," the Dutch word for "Parson."

" To know Peter is to love him,"

Senator Vandenberg said.

"My chaplain is my intimate and priceless friend."

In deed many an astute observer on Capital Hill felt Senator Vandenberg's unobtrusive spiritual partnership with Peter Marshall had under-girded the increasing stature of his statesmanship, as he rose to become the architect of the

UNITED NATIONS

-and of America's first bipartisan foreign policy in many years.

On that Inauguration Day, the vista of an ever-growing and deepening ministry among all those men opened out before Peter.  long ago he had been

"tapped on the shoulder" by "the Chief"

-as he loved to call his lord.

Twenty-two years before he had landed at Ellis Island - an immigrant boy. God sent him into strange places to preach His message

It seemed to Peter that the old Senate Chamber was almost the strangest of all. Yet , there in the highest legislative hall in the nation, the Risen Christ and the wisdom of Almighty God were surely needed.  It thrilled Peter to have the chance to be Christ's representative in that PLACE.

The uncertain Washington sun broke through the heavy clouds as Harry S. Truman took the office as president of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

His left hand was resting on two bibles, a Gutenberg Bible and the White House Bible. His outstretched fingers covered passages from the Sermon on the Mount and the Ten Commandments as he intoned the solemn words:

"I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of the President of the United States, and will defend the Constitution...."

The sky umbrella of planes was already forming for the Inaugural parade as I made my way through the crush of people to our parked car. It was quite a while before my husband joined me. his rugged face was beaming.

 

"Guess what, Catherine ,"

he said as he opened the car door. the joy of a small boy was in his voice.

"What? What's happened?"

"Senator Vandenberg called me 'Peter' today!"

It was a small thing. But it represented the outstretched hand of friendship -the open door to a man's heart.

A long and dramatic train of events had led Peter Marshall to that memorable day. The story has about it the feel of a Biblical saga; yet, it is a story of a modern man, a warmly human man.

As I write I see a procession of vivid mental pictures: A boy walking through a Scottish lane lined with rhododendron trying to hear God's call; a ship ploughing through the cold waters of the North Atlantic; a blast furnace in New Jersey; a boy on a train going south to Birmingham.  There are traces of wistfulness in the story, and a procession of the haunted hearts of men and women. There is much laughter -and sometimes a sob.

 

The story begins some thirty years ago in a grimy industrial city in Scotland.

[We shall touch on the first steps to his ministry at a later stage]

 

*          *         *

Soon to Follow

 

Excerpt from

 Chapter Nine

 

Washington - Opportunity Unlimited.

 

1937...

 

Peter's reputation as a "thrilling evangelical preacher" soon resulted in long lines of people waiting outside New York Avenue Church [Abraham Lincoln's Church] on a Sunday morning. Often four abreast, they were patient and cheerful about the wait. They hoped to be able to get into the sanctuary and find a seat. loud-speakers had to be installed in the Lincoln Chapel and the downstairs lecture room to handle the overflow crowds. When these rooms were filled, there was nothing left to do but turn would-be worshipers away.

*

 

[Font Altered -Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

 

*

 

PART 2

MARCH/07

H.F.457

HH.F.1216. BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

JUNE 6-2017

[ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF D-DAY -JUNE 6-1944 -THE BREAKTHROUGH INTO NAZI-CONTROLLED EUROPE AND ITS LEGACY OF THE NAZI-PLANNED EU WHICH 17 MILLION UK CITIZENS ON JUNE 23-2016 VOTED FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR FREEDOM - CULTURE AND COUNTRY.

MILLIONS DIED IN TWO WORLD WARS TO PROTECT THE ENGLISH CULTURE AND ITS UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND ITS RETURN MUST BE SOONER THAN LATER!]

*

 

 

 

Montgomery’s Message to the troops on        

D. Day –June 6th 1944.

 

The voice of General Montgomery giving a stirring message to his troops before they set out was heard in the BBC war report last night. General Montgomery said:

 

“ The time has come to deal the enemy a terrific blow in Western Europe. The blow will be struck by the combined sea, land and air forces of the Allies, the whole constituting one great Allied team under the Supreme Command of General Eisenhower.

 

On the eve of this great adventure, I send my best wishes to every soldier in the Allied team. To us is given the honour to strike a blow for freedom, which will live in history, and in better days that lie ahead men will speak with pride of their doings.

 

We have a great a righteous cause. Let us pray that the Lord mighty in battle will go forward with our armies and that His special Providence will aid us in our struggle.

 

I want every soldier to know that I have complete confidence in the successful outcome of the operations we are now about to begin

 

With stout hearts and enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. 

 

Good luck to each of you. Good Hunting on the mainland of Europe.

 

*          *          *

 

This message was an inspiration to the troops at the time and it is still a stirring message at this time 60 years hence when our nation is in danger from the ‘Enemy Within’ and I’m sure those who love their country will remember the sacrifice of those taking part and that those that followed with the same spirit of freedom in their hearts will now join us to save our Country and Constitution- before it is too late!

 

And we conclude with a stirring message from General Montgomery in the early hours of D.Day  - June 6 – 1944.

To the troops and all taking part in the landings.

 

  To Win or Lose it All… ”

Click Here for Montgomery's message on Europe in 1962 -

 "I say we must not join Europe!"

 

TREASON -A CONSTITUTIONAL ANAYSIS By NORRIS McWHIRTER- 'Lest-we-forget'

 

 

 

 
ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE
 

by
 

ENOCH POWELL
---

(BIRMINGHAM BRANCH)

 

" England is the country of the English, he said.
England is a stage on which the drama of English history
was played and the setting within which the
English became conscious of themselves as people . . . .

when politicians and preachers attempt to frighten
and cajole the English into pretending away
the distinction between themselves and other nations and
other origins, they are engaged in undermining the
foundation upon which democratic government
by consent and peaceable civilized society in this
country are supplied"
 - 
Enoch Powell

 

 

Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty

 

Is with the English- speaking Peoples of the North Atlantic and Commonwealth, and our answer to those who prefer loss of Identity in an unaccountable, corrupt and godless European Police-State.

 

Thomas Jefferson, third President of the United States, once commented,’ A nation which seeks to trade its political independence for economic gain deserves to lose both’’. If she stays within the emerging European State, and continues to submit to government from Brussels, Britain will lose both her Prosperity and her Independence.

 

There is more prospect of prosperity and security for this country as a member of the North Atlantic Free Trade Area (NAFTA), in which Britain and her People would be able to trade world-wide, retain all ‘’Historic Rights’’, Principles and Privileges, and suffer no loss of National Independence.

 

Historically, Culturally and Politically, Britain has far more in common with the English-speaking Peoples of the North Atlantic and Commonwealth countries, who together have imparted to many nations the lesson of Liberty (which many of our European neighbours later in their history claimed but seem now to have forgotten the hard lesson that one must fight constantly to guard the Treasure of Liberty)   developed  the world’s oldest system of representative government, been the first to recognise inviolable and Fundamental Rights, and created judicial systems free from influence or interference by the State.

 

This profound Kinship, and the need to sustain it politically by separateness from Europe, was uppermost in the mind of Winston Churchill when , in his famous Zurich speech in September ,1946, envisioning a future union of the Continental states, he described Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations and ‘’mighty America ‘’as its prospective ’’friends and sponsors’’ offering support and help; and observed,

 

’’We are with Europe but not of it .

 We are linked, but not combined.

We are interested and associated, but not absorbed’’.

 

Because of Britain’s Unique global position , achievement as a Nation, and contribution to world history, the statement of William Pitt the Younger in 1805 (almost two-hundred years ago)  that England has saved herself by her exertions and Europe by her example’’ is an indication of her timeless role, so long as she is not decadent; and if she has become so, the present may be thought the time for the revival of her Beneficent Nationhood, rather than for it to be extinguished. (  see 101- Reasons )

 

‘’The Choose is yours!’’

 – make it soon, before it is

too late!

 

2003

 

Previous Speaker of the House of Commons-1976-83

 supports our

 Ancient Constitution

 

 The following letter was sent to This England by the late Viscount Tonypandy (Mr George Thomas) Speaker of the House of Commons

 

 Sir: Since I retired from the Speaker’s chair in the House of Commons in 1983, I have strictly adhered to our parliamentary tradition, which prevents former Speakers from being embroiled in party political controversies.

 

It is because I am convinced that the question of our national sovereignty towers above all that I feel free to submit this address to the electors of Britain.

 

Our Westminster Parliament is in danger of being denuded of its responsibilities, and of being supplanted by European assembly controlled by a hotchpotch of European politicians and bureaucrats, who have no love for this country. Our national destiny will be subject to foreign control.

 

In our British heritage a special place of honour is reserved for Pym and Hampden, who so courageously fought for the rights of our Parliament against the claims of absolutism by the Crown. Their portraits hang in pride in Speaker’s House, along with that of Speaker Lenthall who defended Parliament’s independence when it was challenged by Charles 1

 

Other parliamentary giants have followed in their wake. Names such as Palmerston and Pitt, Gladstone, Disraeli, Asquith, Lloyd George, Churchill, Attlee, and the like, shine in our history as fierce defenders of self-government by the British people.

 

They should be living in this hour, for we need support to protect our national interests from being subject to foreign control.

 

 No political party in Britain has a mandate from the electorate to surrender our national sovereignty to foreign hands.

 

The current slide towards a single European currency threatens both our economic and our political independence, and thus our sovereignty. Subterfuge and half-truths have been used to persuade the nation that neither our sovereignty nor our relationship with the Commonwealth is endangered.

 

There appears to be a conspiracy of silence about the fact that the United Kingdom’s trade and oversees investments are still much greater with countries outside the European Union than they are with those within the Union, which is itself increasingly a puppet of a French and German alliance.

 

It is not too late for us to save our sovereignty

 

For more than 600 years Speakers of the House of Commons have fiercely defended the supremacy of the Westminster Parliament. As one whose privilege it was to follow humbly in the steps of the mighty Speakers of the past, I call upon our nation to awake, and to demand that the voice of all our people shall be heard before the next inter-governmental conference takes irrevocable decisions affecting our sovereignty.

 

A national Referendum conducted before, and not after, further decisions are taken is our democratic right.

 

This is the only sure way to prevent our parliamentary sovereignty, our judicial system and our Commonwealth relationships from being grievously undermined.

 

*          *          *

 

We believe that Lord Tonypandy would support our cause at this momentous time for our nation when the people will at last have their say after they have been honestly given the true facts of the dangers to the Constitution, Freedom and Independence of our Country.

2004

 

 

THERE WAS NO REFERENDUM UNTIL

 

 

 

AFTER MANY PROMISES FROM BLAIR AND CAMERON WHO FINALLY DECIDED THE EU RELATIONSHIP WAS SAFE HE CALLED A REFERENDUM ON JUNE 23-2016 AND WAS IGNOMINIOUSLY BEATEN THOUGH BY A SMALLER MAJORITY THAN WE HAD EXPECTED. BUT AS THE BBC - BRUSSELS BROADCASTING CORPORATION AND POLITICAL  AND EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENT  AND TRADE UNIONS AND MUCH BRIBED BUSINESS  AND CORPORATIONS WERE RELUCTANT TO GIVE UP THEIR REGULAR ' PIECES OF SILVER' .  AS WE ALL KNOW IT WAS THE PLAIN MAN-THE COMMON MAN-THE MAN-IN-THE-STREET OF THE SHIRES OF ENGLAND WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CENTRAL BLOT ON THE LANDSCAPE-WARWICK-WITH THEIR MAJORITY OF EU BACKERS    WHEREAS  ELSEWHERE IN ENGLAND THE MAJORITY STOOD FIRM FOR THEIR ACCUSTOMED FREEDOM-THEIR CULTURE-THEIR UNIQUE PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY AND CONSTITUTION.. AND IN A FEW WORDS-

THEY LOVED THEIR COUNTRY.

VICTORY
OUR INSPIRATION SINCE VOTING NO! AT THE 1975 REFERENDUM- CONTESTING THE GENERAL ELECTION IN 1997 AND THE EUROPEAN ELECTION IN 1999 AND STILL AT OUR POST TODAY JUNE 6-2017

VICTORY  You ask, What is our aim? I can answer in one word: victory-victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival- WINSTON CHURCHILL.

May 1940

 

 

A WARNING MANY OF YOU IGNORED ON JUNE 23-2016

 

Harry Beckhough's

Germany's Four Reich's

PART 1  Germanised Empire in the Making  PART 2 -The New Beginning   

PART 3 -The Third Reich    PART 4 -The Taskmaster of Europe                 

*

 

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

 

In 1962,

 Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality 

HITLER'S plan for Europe

 under

 GERMAN CONTROL.

  1086  

1136

677

24

1137

1042

B56

C34

B103

1121

C30

C33

*

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

JUJUST A FEW OF THE THOUSANDS OF BULLETINS ON THE EU SINCE 2003

 
 

 

WHY ARE WE STILL WAITING

FOR

BREXIT?

 

JUNE 23- 2016 - JUNE 23-2017

 

JULY

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

1

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

AUG

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

2

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

SEPT

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

3

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

OCT

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

4

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

NOV

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

5

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

DEC

23-

2016

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

6

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

JAN

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

7

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

*

 

FEB

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

8

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

MARCH

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

9

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

APRIL

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

10

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

MAY

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

THE EU

MONTH

11

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

JUNEV

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

12

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

JULY

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

13

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

AUG

23-

2017

AWAITING

FREEDOM FROM

 THE EU

MONTH

14

LOST TIME!

BREXIT NOT IMPLEMENTED

JUNE 7-2017

JUNE 23-2017

'The Longest Day'
D-DAY, 6th June 1944.

AND AGAIN

ON

JUNE 23-2016.

WHEN ONCE AGAIN WE MUST DEFEAT HITLER'S PLAN BY

LEAVING THE EU

[NOT EUROPE]

AND RECOVER WHAT MILLIONS OF OUR SOLDIERS-SAILORS AND AIRMEN AND PEOPLE FOUGHT TO PROTECT IN 1914 AND AGAIN IN 1939.

 

WHAT WE SAID ON 6TH JUNE 2004
 

To some of us it seems only yesterday when those countless warriors for Freedom left our shores to fight to Free the peoples of a war torn Europe.

Many of those taking part were from the other parts of the English Speaking World the Commonwealth and other nation states that joined the Free World to fight the tripartite evil of State Dominance of Peoples, which is shortly again to be upon us in the form of the new European Constitution.

For those returning to the battle fields of Europe it must be in their minds as to how after all that had taken place 60 years ago that the one Nation that faced the terror almost alone -a unique Democracy an example to the world from which seed of Freedom rose, those Free Independent Nations States throughout the world during the past three centuries, is now fighting for its survival from traitors within.

Today our nation is now itself in peril from a doctrine alien to its nature but well known across our moat of history for it's emphasis on order by the State rather than our centuries old lesson that the State is our servant - not our master.

There is an awakening taking place of the dangers to our way-of-life but whether it will be in time to save us in the short time we remain a truly Free Nation State only the People can decide.

On June 6th 2004 all our thoughts will be with those who lost loved ones and those that suffered at home and abroad to bring Peace and Prosperity back to a war weary world. May we escape the present evil, which threatens to enslave our People and Country- God Save Our Queen!

May God save our Queen and our Country?
 

WE ASK! IN JUNE 2016 WHAT HAVE YOU DONE! TO PREVENT OUR UNIQUE AND ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE FROM BECOMING  REGIONS OF THE 1943 NAZI-PLANNED EUROPEAN UNION?

 

6th June,2004
 

 

 

 

 

 

Wobble or not, Theresa is the only show in town even if I don't believe she will deliver the tungsten-tipped

BREXIT

[ON JUNE 8-2017]

I want,

writes

 

Nine days to go and, finally, the Tories announce they intend to concentrate on Brexit for the rest of the campaign. Hallelujah!

To be honest, after taking a short break for an election detox, I had hoped it would be all over bar the shouting by now. Sadly not. There's still more than a week of this patronising nonsense until we actually get the chance to cast our votes.

On the day Mother Theresa decided she would go to the country, I warned that a campaign lasting the best part of two months had the potential to go pear-shaped. Events, dear lady, events, as Harold Macmillan almost said.

No one could have predicted the awful atrocity in Manchester. But even before the bomber struck to such evil and devastating effect, things were starting to unravel. Boredom and irritation set in long ago, as the politicking expanded to fill the time available in the 24-hour news cycle.

An election supposedly about Britain leaving the EU has inevitably become about anything but. The nadir was reached the day after my last column, when the Green Party staged a rally against 'Period Poverty', attracting widespread coverage on the rolling news channels and in the anti-Tory Press.

At first, I thought period poverty might be something to do with Poldark.

Turns out it was a protest against VAT on sanitary products. A noble enough cause, but what the hell has the price of tampons got to do with Brexit?

Quite a lot, apparently. VAT is imposed on sanitary products by an EU edict. So you might have thought the Greens would be all in favour of Britain breaking free of the Brussels yoke. Nothing could be further from the truth.

They want to derail

Brexit

and keep us in the EU — tampon tax and all, presumably.

Go figure, as our American cousins say.

This was just one daft diversion from the central purpose of calling the election. Some of the others, such as the furore over the so-called 'dementia tax' (which is nothing of the sort) have proven to be more serious.

If Mother Theresa is in trouble in the latest polls, she has only herself to blame. This should have been a short, sharp election focused on a single, defining issue.

It should have been held on the same day as the local elections in early May and would have resulted in a decisive victory for the Tories.

By now, she would be the unassailable mistress of all she surveyed and Britain's future independence would be assured. Instead, it has dragged on, and on, and on, with every new day bringing another pointless policy initiative, giving her opponents a new line of attack.

Yesterday, for instance, the deeply unimpressive Home Secretary Amber Rudd was doing the rounds on radio and TV.

The presenters all wanted to question her about the failure of so-called control orders to stop known terrorist suspects from operating with impunity.

Instead, they were forced to ask her first about a new initiative on domestic violence — obviously at the insistence of her media handlers. Admittedly, domestic violence, like VAT on tampons, is a legitimate subject for debate. But neither is what this election is supposed to be about, for heaven's sake.

Hubris took over, bolstered by initial predictions of a three-figure majority. Theresa was running round Wembley with the cup before a ball had been kicked.

Frankly, I've never believed the polls and always thought the Tories would be happy with any kind of majority approaching 50.

That's still achievable, but time is at a premium. It's no secret that I'm not a paid-up member of the Theresa May fan club, but I do intend to vote for her next week.

She's the only show in town, even if I have little confidence in her delivering the kind of tungsten-tipped Brexit I want. Most people I know feel much the same. She's the 'Who Else Is There?' candidate.

The Conservative Party isn't exactly brimming with talent, but anyone who seriously thinks Labour is a credible government in waiting should be sectioned.

You don't need me to reiterate the shocking unsuitability of the terrorist-loving Trots in the Corbynista cabal, especially in the wake of the Manchester attack. OK, so there's been a Tory wobble. Good. Wobbles concentrate the mind at this stage in an election campaign.

Don't read too much into Labour's apparent resurgence, either. Back in 1987, I spent a month on Neil Kinnock's election battle bus. As polling day approached, a couple of rogue polls suggested Labour was going to win and the Conservatives went into a blind panic.

Glenys Kinnock started mentally measuring up the curtains at No 10. On election night, I stood outside the Welsh Windbag's constituency home as the BBC's Vincent Hanna marched up to the front door bearing an exit poll which pointed to a Labour majority. We could hear the cheering coming from within.

Lovely, tidy, smashing.


 

A couple of hours later, after the count, I watched Kinnochio slump away as the realisation dawned that the Tories had romped home by 102 seats.

The smell of stale chip fat hung in the air, a poignant olfactory requiem for his abject failure.

Oh dear, how sad, never mind.

It's now up to Theresa to get back on track, to show real leadership, to ignore the squabbling, wobbling munchkins in her private office, and remember why she called this election in the first place.

 

She told us

 Brexit means Brexit

and the only — repeat, only — reason for calling an election two short years after the last one was to give her a mandate to get on with it. If she really intends to be true to her word, she is entitled to our support next week and will deserve our long-term gratitude if she pulls it off. We shall just have to take her on trust.

More than 17 million people voted

Leave.

We've got no choice other than to give her a solid mandate to turn that decision into reality. The alternative is too horrible to contemplate.

Despite the fevered speculation surrounding the latest polls, I fully expect her to be returned to Downing Street with an increased majority. 

Just so long as it doesn't go to her head and she can resist the temptation to call another election over the next five years.

*
 

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4553500/Wobble-not-Theresa-town.html#ixzz4iZA2OBHe
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MAY 30-2017

H F 644

DAILY MAIL

-COMMENT

May 1-2017

WHY THESE EU BULLY BOYS

FEAR

DEMOCRACY

 

There was more than a hint of the bizarre about the meeting at which 27 EU leaders set out their negotiating position on

 Brexit.

After getting round the conference table in Brussels, they deliberated for just four minutes before issuing a set of absurdly draconian demands.

Then, like some 1970s meeting of the Chinese Communist party, they erupted into a protracted round of applause and self-congratulation, as if they had done something terribly clever.

In fact, what they presented was not so much a negotiating position as an ultimatum to Britain – pay a £50billion penalty, guarantee the rights of all EU citizens living in the UK, give Spain a veto on the future of Gibraltar and promise not to enforce border controls between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic.

And they continued talking tough after the meeting, both directly and through a series of carefully choreographed media briefings. Britain would have to pay a huge price for leaving, they said, and Theresa May was ‘delusional’ if she thought the EU would enter trade talks before the cash was stumped up.

Jean-Claude Juncker, the insufferably pompous, cognac-loving head of the European Commission, spoke gravely of an ‘early crash’ in negotiations unless we acquiesced. European Council president Donald Tusk said it was time for Britain to ‘get serious’.

But Britain is already deadly serious, Mr Tusk. Serious about leaving the EU, regaining control of our borders and throwing off the shackles of the European Court. If we have to do that without a trade deal in place, as Mrs May stated again yesterday, we will do so and no amount of bullying or empty threats from Brussels will change that.

Unlike Mr Tusk and Mr Juncker, Mrs May has a democratic mandate and she intends to honour it.

These ludicrous blowhards should also remember that Britain imports billions of pounds a year more in goods and services from the EU than we export to them. So German car makers, French wine producers and Irish farmers have more to lose from a trade war than UK manufacturers.

Of course, there is another agenda. With Euroscepticism rampant across the continent, the EU high command wants to punish Britain for leaving as a warning to other member states not to follow suit. They are terrified that a blast of democracy could soon destroy their cosy little club.

The Mail is confident Mrs May will not be deflected by these cynical tactics but she needs the full support of the British people in the difficult negotiations to come.

 The best way to strengthen her hand is to give her a resounding majority on

June 8.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4461436/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-EU-bully-boys-fear-democracy.html#ixzz4fpOSBgaw
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

Full article

MAY 1,2017

*  *  *

 

DESPOTISM!

When there are too many individuals involved in making a decision as with the 27 within the EU  it Iwas inevitable that each member would suffer with  loss of control over its culture and identity as shown by the growing revolt among the once Free Independent People's of Europe. They were warned that they would be part of a SUPER-STATE of REGIONS - one happy family? One must remember that Angela Merkel the GERMAN CHANCELLOR was an official in the East German Government and well-trained for her future position in WEST GERMANY.

Trapped within its despotic embrace the once FREE NATION STATES are now within a COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-GODLESS BEAST where the

PEOPLE are the SERVANTS!

and those part of the SOVIETISED MACHINE

within the EU HIERARCHY are the

MASTERS!

*

Almost everything, which is precious in our Civilization, has come from small States.

by LABOUR PEER-Peter Shore.

*

 

Britain can leave the EU unilaterally and cease payment says Queen's Counsel-November-2005.

 

*

DAILY MAIL

-COMMENT

May 1-2017

WHY THESE EU BULLY BOYS

FEAR

DEMOCRACY

 

There was more than a hint of the bizarre about the meeting at which 27 EU leaders set out their negotiating position on

 Brexit.

After getting round the conference table in Brussels, they deliberated for just four minutes before issuing a set of absurdly draconian demands.

Then, like some 1970s meeting of the Chinese Communist party, they erupted into a protracted round of applause and self-congratulation, as if they had done something terribly clever.

In fact, what they presented was not so much a negotiating position as an ultimatum to Britain – pay a £50billion penalty, guarantee the rights of all EU citizens living in the UK, give Spain a veto on the future of Gibraltar and promise not to enforce border controls between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic.

And they continued talking tough after the meeting, both directly and through a series of carefully choreographed media briefings. Britain would have to pay a huge price for leaving, they said, and Theresa May was ‘delusional’ if she thought the EU would enter trade talks before the cash was stumped up.

Jean-Claude Juncker, the insufferably pompous, cognac-loving head of the European Commission, spoke gravely of an ‘early crash’ in negotiations unless we acquiesced. European Council president Donald Tusk said it was time for Britain to ‘get serious’.

But Britain is already deadly serious, Mr Tusk. Serious about leaving the EU, regaining control of our borders and throwing off the shackles of the European Court. If we have to do that without a trade deal in place, as Mrs May stated again yesterday, we will do so and no amount of bullying or empty threats from Brussels will change that.

Unlike Mr Tusk and Mr Juncker, Mrs May has a democratic mandate and she intends to honour it.

These ludicrous blowhards should also remember that Britain imports billions of pounds a year more in goods and services from the EU than we export to them. So German car makers, French wine producers and Irish farmers have more to lose from a trade war than UK manufacturers.

Of course, there is another agenda. With Euroscepticism rampant across the continent, the EU high command wants to punish Britain for leaving as a warning to other member states not to follow suit. They are terrified that a blast of democracy could soon destroy their cosy little club.

The Mail is confident Mrs May will not be deflected by these cynical tactics but she needs the full support of the British people in the difficult negotiations to come.

 The best way to strengthen her hand is to give her a resounding majority on

June 8.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4461436/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-EU-bully-boys-fear-democracy.html#ixzz4fpOSBgaw
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

Full article

MAY 1,2017

*  *  *

 

DESPOTISM!

When there are too many individuals involved in making a decision as with the 27 within the EU  it Iwas inevitable that each member would suffer with  loss of control over its culture and identity as shown by the growing revolt among the once Free Independent People's of Europe. They were warned that they would be part of a SUPER-STATE of REGIONS - one happy family? One must remember that Angela Merkel the GERMAN CHANCELLOR was an official in the East German Government and well-trained for her future position in WEST GERMANY.

Trapped within its despotic embrace the once FREE NATION STATES are now within a COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-GODLESS BEAST where the

PEOPLE are the SERVANTS!

and those part of the SOVIETISED MACHINE

within the EU HIERARCHY are the

MASTERS!

*

Almost everything, which is precious in our Civilization, has come from small States.

by LABOUR PEER-Peter Shore.

*

 

Britain can leave the EU unilaterally and cease payment says Queen's Counsel-November-2005.

 

*

 

EU lawyers privately admit £92billion

 Brexit Bill

is IMPOSSIBLE to enforce

  • EU officials  were told they could  not 'cherry pick' the accounts and hit the UK with the hefty bill

  • The advice  is a boost for Theresa May who has dismissed the staggering bill

  • But the European Commission appears to have overruled the advice and are pushing ahead with the demand regardless

The shock revelation is contained in minutes of a meeting and given to the Brexit negotiation team in Brussels.

But the European Commission has ignored the advice of its own lawyers and pushed ahead with demanding the hefty bill regardless.

[Does not this bloody-minded attitude confirm that the EU COMMISSION is not a fit political body for many of it's membership and once we are out- others -particularly the financial contributors -will surely follow.

 

The staggering bill has contributed to the poisoning of relations between Britain and the EU.

Full article!

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4481498/EU-lawyers-say-92billion-Brexit-Bill-t-enforced.html#ixzz4gO9Vfij7
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


MAY 7-2017

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

*

H.F.1189 FREEDOM- WITH OUR LAWS-CUSTOM AND COUNTRY WILL SOON BE OURS!

*

 
 

A

BATTLE CRY TO RALLY ALL WHO WANT A FREE BRITAIN

 

DAILY MAIL

-COMMENT-

Thursday, May 4,2017

 

[A CAUSE OF FREEDOM!]

This was the day Theresa May put into words a truth that has been plain to this paper for a fortnight. Delivering a charge that could hardly be more serious, she rightly accused European politicians and officials of a deeply improper attempt to influence the way Britain votes next month.

Put bluntly, they are conducting a campaign of threats to our country, hardening their negotiating stance and planting distortions in the EU-friendly media. Their purpose is wholly transparent — and it flies in the face of the diplomatic protocol that foreign powers should never interfere in the democratic process of other nations.

As the Prime Minister said in Downing Street yesterday: ‘All of these acts have been deliberately timed to affect the result of the General Election that will take place on June 8.’

Indeed, you can almost smell the panic gripping European elites, as polls show Mrs May heading for a thumping Commons majority to strengthen her bargaining hand in the Brexit talks.

All over the EU, politicians, eurocrats and their hangers-on in the British and continental media are adopting desperate tactics to promote the chances of Remainer candidates at the Prime Minister’s expense.

In Brussels, the Commission’s chief negotiator Michel Barnier yesterday tried to put the wind up the electorate by laying down blatantly unreasonable conditions for allowing talks on a trade deal even to begin.

Not only did he make impertinent demands about the UK’s border with Ireland, while insisting that British judges should continue to defer to the European Court of Justice over the rights

Preposterously, he went on to demand that we should hand over yet more money to ‘close the account’ with a club that has sponged off British taxpayers for more than four decades.

As for how much more he hopes to extort, a few weeks ago he suggested we ‘owe’ some £50 billion. But yesterday, the EU’s slavish devotees at the Japanese-owned Financial Times — whose editor has been nominated for France’s Legion d’Honneur in recognition of his services to the European project — went further still.

Plucking figures from the air, its Brussels correspondent opined that ‘new demands driven by France and Germany’ would increase our ‘upfront’ Brexit bill to some £85 billion.

As any child should be able to see, such figures carry no authority whatever. 

With the EU’s accounts in chaotic disarray — so much so that auditors have refused to sign them off for almost 20 years — it is sheer fantasy to pretend anyone can say with certainty who owes what to whom.

Indeed, isn’t there a powerful case for arguing that the EU should be handing us a massive cheque to repay our investments, subsidies and loans?

Yet extraordinarily, the FT’s figures were widely quoted — not least by the BBC — as if they had some basis in fact. 

The clear message from our national broadcaster was that we should all be trembling in our boots at the prospect of being served with a crippling bill.

For a few weeks during the referendum campaign, the Corporation showed commendable fairness in its coverage.

But with Brexit drawing ever closer, it appears to have abandoned any attempt at balance, setting itself up as the unofficial mouthpiece of Brussels.

Witness the glee with which the BBC seized on selective leaks in a German newspaper, believed to have been planted by Jean-Claude Juncker’s chief of staff, suggesting Mrs May’s hopes for Brexit were wildly unrealistic.

The EU Commission president was said in these reports to have left a private dinner in Downing Street last week saying the chances of a deal were less than 50 per cent and that Mrs May lived in a ‘galaxy of her own’.

We have long learned to expect no better of the bibulous Mr Juncker. But how deeply disappointing that Germany’s Angela Merkel appears to have joined him in his efforts to influence our election, branding Brexiteers ‘delusional’ if they think they will be better off outside the EU.

Not that they have any shortage of British allies in their campaign to sabotage Brexit. For while many who voted Remain have fully accepted the referendum result, others such as Nick Clegg, Tim Farron and the rest of their party are as determined as ever to frustrate the will of the people.

Indeed, yesterday the Lib Dem leader let his mask as a touchy-feely man of the people slip. 

In an encounter reminiscent of Gordon Brown’s attack on Gillian Duffy as a ‘bigoted woman’, Mr Farron rounded on a Brexit-supporting former Labour voter, asking: ‘Have you got grandchildren? Are you proud that they will inherit a poorer, less powerful, less secure country?’

Not to be outdone, George Osborne — the architect of Project Fear — took a sideswipe at Mrs May on his first day as an editor, writing that her claims to have a strong negotiating hand were unrealistic, and the Brexit vote had been an ‘historic mistake’.

Not that they have any shortage of British allies in their campaign to sabotage Brexit. For while many who voted Remain have fully accepted the referendum result, others such as Nick Clegg, Tim Farron and the rest of their party are as determined as ever to frustrate the will of the people.

Indeed, yesterday the Lib Dem leader let his mask as a touchy-feely man of the people slip. 

In an encounter reminiscent of Gordon Brown’s attack on Gillian Duffy as a ‘bigoted woman’, Mr Farron rounded on a Brexit-supporting former Labour voter, asking: ‘Have you got grandchildren? Are you proud that they will inherit a poorer, less powerful, less secure country?’

Not to be outdone, George Osborne — the architect of Project Fear — took a sideswipe at Mrs May on his first day as an editor, writing that her claims to have a strong negotiating hand were unrealistic, and the Brexit vote had been an ‘historic mistake’.

Will this dismal, defeatist talk never cease? The truth is that Britain buys far more from our EU partners than they buy from us. Millions of livelihoods — German car makers, French wine growers, Spanish and Irish farmers —depend on our markets. They need us more than we need them.

When the blustering and posturing end, and the talks begin, there is every hope that EU politicians will consider the interests of their own voters and work for a deal that suits everyone.

As for the likes of Mr Juncker, Mr Barnier and Mrs Merkel, who think they can scare British voters into doing their bidding, how little they understand our national character!

Their meddling in our democracy will surely backfire — and strengthen our determination to back Mrs May.

With her defiant, electrifying address outside No 10, she raised a battle cry that will resonate with everyone who wants a free, prosperous and truly independent Britain for our children and grandchildren.

Full article

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4471810/Battle-cry-want-free-Britain.html#ixzz4gIpo0uO6
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

THE MESSAGE WENT HOME

ON FRIDAY MAY 5-2017

Historic Tory Poll triumph as Ukip wiped out and Labour buried in their own back yard.

THERESA

 ON THE MARCH

May on the march: Tories predicted to win a Commons ... -by Jason Groves-political editor- Daily Mail

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1188 FREEDOM- WITH OUR LAWS-CUSTOM AND COUNTRY WILL SOON BE OURS!

 

 

ULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017--       - (1994 -Official Website-JUNE-2017 ) -   JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017-PT1 -

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

 

BREXIT

ANNOUNCEMENT

ARTICLE 50 LETTER

DELIVERED BY

'HER MAJESTY'S AMBASSADOR

TO

BRUSSELS

ON

MARCH 29-2017

*

ON

THE FINAL STRETCH

 TO

 FREEDOM

OF THE

PEOPLE AND NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

[TIME ELAPSED SINCE REFERENDUM IN JUNE-2016

 11 MONTHS

 

JUNE-2017- AUG-2019 (?)

 

JUNE 23-2017.

 

BREXIT

ANNOUNCEMENT

ARTICLE 50 LETTER

DELIVERED BY

'HER MAJESTY'S AMBASSADOR

TO

BRUSSELS

ON

MARCH 29-2017

*

ON

THE FINAL STRETCH

 TO

 FREEDOM

OF THE

PEOPLE AND NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

[TIME ELAPSED SINCE REFERENDUM IN JUNE-2016

 12 MONTHS

 

JULY-2017- AUG-2019 (?)

JULY 23-2017.

*

 

[No 1]

 

    DAILY MAIL

     

    -MAY: EU MIGRANTS CAN STAY IN UK


    Daily Mail
    May says 3.2million EU citizens CAN stay in Britain after we leave
    Daily Mail - 14 hours ago
    May insists her offer to let three million EU citizens stay after Brexit is 'fair' ... All of
    the 3.2million EU nationals currently in the UK will be allowed to stay ..... in case
    there is a late surge of migrants arriving as Brexit approaches.

    JUNE 23,2017

H.F.1226 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

SHORT CUT TO EXIT EU NEWS

eu latest news on brexit

latest news eu

eu latest immigration news

eu news now

eu news today

europe news headlines

eu germany latest

eu news germany

 

SMAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT:

April 20, 2017

Why the saboteurs should simmer down

Like the mating dance of the warthog, a must-see ritual of the natural world is the British Left throwing a fit of the vapours over a headline in the Mail. The latest to provoke hysteria was our front-page summary of why Theresa May called for a snap election: 'Crush the saboteurs.'

'Nasty and divisive!' tweeted Labour's IRA, Hamas and Hezbollah-sympathising John McDonnell (look who's talking!). 'This kind of hate and aggression is the last thing the country needs,' whimpered the ever-smug tax avoider Gary Lineker.

'Fascist!' said a Guardianista. 'Stalinist!' opined another, with some halfwit tweeting: 'Stalin killed millions by labelling people saboteurs and enemies of the people. Literally the same words as the Mail. Chilling.' Not for the first time, this paper advises: calm down, dears.

For the avoidance of doubt, neither the PM nor this peace-loving paper proposes genocide. All that Mrs May plans, with our support, is an election to establish her mandate for pressing on with

BREXIT

(backed by 52 per cent)

without further frustration from 'game-playing' Remoaners and an unelected second chamber.

As for the word 'saboteurs', how else to describe a Labour Party which has threatened to vote against a final agreement with the EU? Or Lib Dems who say they want to grind government to a standstill? Or Scots Nats who say they'll vote against legislation repealing our EU membership?

If they don't like being called saboteurs, shouldn't they give up the sabotage?

And how striking that many who criticised the Mail were the very same people who likened Mrs May's call for an election to the move by Turkey's human rights-violating dictator, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to increase his powers. What a contemptibly stupid and offensive comparison.

We have long known the Left demonises anyone with whom it disagrees. But this is getting ridiculous.



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4427192/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-saboteurs-simmer-down.html#ixzz4eo141qsw
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 
[A PROCLAMATION

FOR

 ENGLAND'S

 FREEDOM AND FUTURE.

 

COUNTDOWN TO SUCCESS

ON

JUNE 8-2017

WE REMIND REMOANERS-PARTICULARLY MPs THAT BREXIT IS ABOUT FREEDOM-CULTURE AND COUNTRY-AND PROSPERITY WITHIN A WIDER WORLD OF OPPORTUNITY

NOT ABOUT IF YOU COULD LOSE YOUR JOB OR BUSINESS OR EU HANDOUTS-

PAID FOR BY ENGLISH TAXPAYERS MAINLY IN THE SOUTH EAST OF ENGLAND.]

*

     

    Tory manifesto will guarantee end

     

     

     

    of

     

     

     

     

    free movement

     

     

     

     

    ++

     

     

     

     

     

     UK to leave Single Market

     

     

     

     

     ++

     

     

     

     

     

     No more

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    meddling by Euro Judges

     

     

     

     

     

     

    by

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Jason Groves-Political Editor | Daily

     

     

    Mail Online

     

     

    THERESA'S CAST-IRON

    BREXIT

    PLEDGES

     

     

     

     

     

    THERESA MAY will place a triple lock on Brexit  in the Tory manifesto to STOP OBSTRUCTION

     

     

    by

     

     

    DIEHARD REMAINERS

     

    Tory sources say she is set to include specific pledges to overcome opposition within her party and in the Lords.

    The manifesto is expected to commit the Conservatives to ending

     

    EU FREE MOVEMENT

     

    and pulling out of both the

    SINGLE MARKET

    and

    EUROPEAN COURT of JUSTICE

    Senior Tories see these three measures as essential in delivering last year's referendum result

    [Mrs May's Pledge that

    BREXIT means BREXIT

     is MET!]

     

    Full article

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    April 20-2017

     

     

     

    Brexit boost as US Speaker backs

     

     

     

     

    free trade deal with

     

     

     

    UK

     

     

     

     

    ... - Daily Mail

     

     

     

    by Jack Doyle Executive Political Editorl

     

     

     

    THERESA MAY received a major boost last night after a

     

    leading US politician backed a swift free

     

    trade deal with the UK

     

    Paul Ryan, the Speaker of the House of

     

    Representatives and a senior member of

     

    Donald Trump's Republican party, said

     

     

    Washington wanted to strike a free trade

     

     

     

    deal with BRITAIN as soon as possible.

     

     

     

    In a speech to the Policy Exchange think-tank

     

    in Central London, Mr Ryan said such

     

     

    a deal would 'further tap into the great

     

    potential between our

     

    TWO PEOPLE...

     

     

    Full article

     

     

    April 20-2017

     

     

     

    QUENTIN LETTS: Mrs May enjoying

     

     

     

    power for first time | Daily Mail ...

     

    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/.../QUENTIN-LETTS-Mrs May-enjoying-power-

    time.html

    18 hours ago ... It's not just the new hairstyle. Mrs May is glowing. For the

    first time, she's is really enjoying power, writes QUENTIN LETTS.

    By Quentin Letts for ...
     

     

    Full article

     

    April 20-2017

 

 FOREIGN AID

A few days ago we saw Andrew Mitchell MP speaking on Channel 4.

He is a sanctimonious POMPOUS ASE!-No one denies that there should be FOREIGN AID-It is how it is SPENT and WASTED, when there are countless deserving causes here at

 HOME.

The Daily Mail has done a GOOD SERVICE as in many other MATTERS in revealing the TRUTH! about how the TAXPAYER'S HARD EARNED TAXES are being SPENT.

With a NATIONAL DEBT of £1.73 TRILLION we are in REALITY

BROKE!

MR MITCHELL.

UK National Debt - Current, Recent, Historical Charts Tables

www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/uk

_national_debt_chart.html

At Budget time in March 2017: The UK National Debt is estimated to be £1.73 trillion.
*

 

[COMMENTS  ARE OURS!]

APRIL 21-2017

 

 

DAILY MAIL

 COMMENT-

April 22,2017

Mrs May's chance to restore voters' trust

Let's face it, millions of hearts sank when Theresa May called for yet another election after the barrage of recent summonses to the ballot box.

Indeed, who could blame the public if they’re weary of politics, or see it as a profoundly dishonest game, played for the benefit of a self-interested elite, in which promises count for nothing?

The good news is that Mrs May is wonderfully placed to change all that.

People trust Theresa May as a woman with a mission to improve life for everyone, not just a privileged few

By temperament, this vicar’s daughter stands a world apart from the view – exemplified

by

Tony Blair and the Cameron/Osborne

CHUMOCRACY –

that politics is a means of helping friends in the City and establishing influential contacts to exploit in later life.

Instinctively, people trust her as a woman with a mission to improve life for everyone, not just a privileged few. Indeed, polls show her scoring higher than any previous leader, Labour or Tory, in categories including patriotism, judgment and understanding of Britain’s problems.

Remarkably, she is as popular in the North as the South, while even Scots now prefer the Tories to Labour.

Mrs May should also benefit in June from the robust health of the economy since the

Brexit vote

– something that may well not last as the business cycle turns. Meanwhile, her biggest advantage of all is the manifest unfitness to govern of that superannuated Trot Jeremy Corbyn and the ‘coalition of chaos’ he hopes to lead.

But if she is to make the best of everything going for her, it will not be enough merely to trust in her opponents’ unelectability.

For if she finds the right language and policies, she has a magnificent opportunity to redraw the electoral map of Britain – re-establishing the Tories as the party of all regions and classes, speaking for every aspirational family.

This is why it is vital her 2017 manifesto should reject the example of the cynical and dishonest document on which David Cameron went to the country two years ago. In this, he made no fewer than 625 pledges, intending not to keep them but to use them as chips to be bargained away with Nick Clegg in a renewed coalition.

Indeed, Mrs May has made clear she will pledge only what she can deliver – even if this means ditching her predecessor’s most popular but reckless policies, such as his freeze on all the main taxes and the crippling triple-lock on pensions.

Elsewhere, the manifesto gives her the chance to win a mandate for bringing back selective schooling, while enabling her to shore up her plans for Brexit against further sabotage by the Lords.

As for retaining the target to cut net immigration to the tens of thousands, it is true that this won’t be immediately attainable. But by focusing officialdom’s minds on the need to get the numbers down, it can only be welcome.

One grave reservation. This paper is deeply disappointed that, while we’re cutting our defences to insanely low levels, Mrs May intends to retain the law compelling us to spend 0.7 per cent of national output on foreign aid. But at least there is hope she may redefine how the figure is calculated, enabling her to switch aid cash to budgets such as defence.

But Mrs May’s main task will be to make good on the promises she made on her first day as PM, when she vowed to stand up for those who are just managing and narrow the socially corrosive gap between the privileged elites and the have-nots.

Heaven knows, five years will not be enough to tackle the mighty challenges facing us, from putting the

NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE

 on a viable footing

 to

REFORMING THE LORDS.

But- if Mrs May puts her policies where her heart lies, concentrating on revitalising areas such as the North, she can make the Tories a truly national force once again – and the natural party of government.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4434158/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-Mrs-s-chance-restore-voter-trust.html#ixzz4ez4SFyzQ
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

FAITH

Despotism may govern without faith, but Liberty cannot.- De Tocqueville.

*

Faith and works are as necessary to our spiritual life as Christians, as soul and body are to our life as men; for faith is the soul of religion, and works, the body.-

Colton

*

Faith is like love; it cannot be forced-As trying to force love begets hatred, so trying to compel belief leads to unbelief.-

 Schopenhauer.

*

[ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS ARE OURS!]

APRIL 22-2017

H.F.1175-FREEDOM-PEACE AND PROSPERITY IN A  FREE COUNTRY.

*

H.F. 1175 FREEDOM AND A FUTURE LINKED TO THE PAST!

 

 PETER OBORNE

POLITICS AND POWER

*

Mrs May's chance to

exercise the

SLEEZE

left

by Dave's

CHUMOCRACY

 

 

THERESA MAY might be blighted by the toxic legacy of the previous Tory leader, David Cameron 

Theresa May has one tremendous advantage over her predecessor, David Cameron. No one doubts the integrity of the Anglican vicar's daughter.

Even so, the danger is that she might become blighted by the toxic legacy of the previous Tory leader.

This is the result of a series of deeply worrying allegations about how Mr Cameron abused public office during his six years as Prime Minister.

Principal among these is the suggestion that the Conservatives 'bought' their 2015 General Election victory by breaking the law that limits how much candidates can spend. Already the Electoral Commission, which polices election campaign spending, has fined the party an unprecedented £70,000 for failing to declare or accurately report more than £275,000 of spending.

As part of a parallel investigation, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has said it may bring charges against up to 30 — repeat, 30! — Conservative officials and MPs in connection with this alleged fraud. At least 12 police forces have sent files relating to the cases to the CPS.

Most dangerous of all, however, are the Mail's revelations of links between Cameron's inner circle of political cronies and the tax-dodging taxi firm Uber.

Yesterday, in the latest damning report, Guy Adams revealed that there is huge pressure for a full parliamentary inquiry to be held into this shady affair.

The public must be told the whole truth about how Cameron's chumocracy successfully lobbied in secret to make sure plans to regulate Uber were dropped. It is vital that we are also told about the operation then led by No 10 officials to cover up their own murky activities.

It is a morality tale for our times.

Since 1865, London taxi-drivers have had to serve a long apprenticeship to ensure they have 'the knowledge' to navigate their way around the capital.

But suddenly their livelihoods, and those of hackney carriage drivers in other British cities, have become threatened by the arrival of Uber, a cut-price rival which allows people to summon a minicab by using an app on their mobile phone.

The company was assisted in gaining a stronghold on the market after officials in Mr Cameron's No 10 team bullied then London Mayor Boris Johnson's City Hall into abandoning tough new regulations that would have hampered Uber.

The Mail has revealed that, at the time, Uber employed Rachel Whetstone, one of Mr Cameron's closest friends and the godmother of his late son Ivan, as its head of PR.

More than that, there is a well-founded suspicion that Uber managed to corrupt the process of government itself. The Competition And Markets Authority, an independent regulator responsible for protecting the public from unfair monopolies, also seems to have been pressured by government officials to support the tax-avoiding internet giant in its battle against traditional black cab drivers.

What's most disturbing is that there is evidence of a cover-up of all this in the Cameron administration, with officials in No 10 and at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills giving misleading responses when asked under Freedom of Information laws about their involvement on behalf of Uber.

Not surprisingly, following the Mail's revelations, the Information Commissioner has announced an investigation into whether government officials breached the Act to try to keep their lobbying secret. Deliberately destroying, hiding or altering requested information is a criminal offence...


Full article


Read more:
http://www.co.uk/debate/article-4434488/Theresa-s-chance-exorcise-sleaze-left-Cameron.html#ixzz4f4YL0o2v
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

*

[As we have stated on a number of occasions over the past DECADES,  MPs on leaving the HOUSE should be INVESTIGATED to account for their THEIR TIME IN OFFICE in order to ensure their PROBITY and in the event of matters such as described above that THE LAW BREAKERS be BROUGHT TO JUSTICE!-THOSE GUILTY of IMPROPER CONDUCT as described above and those who conduct ILLEGAL WARS such as TONY BLAIR and HIS CRONIES have still NOT BEEN INDICTED for WAR CRIMES.   ]

*  *  *

STATESMANSHIP

'The true statesmanship is the art of changing a nation from what it is into what it ought to be'-

W.R.ALGER

*

 'If I had wished to raise up a race of statesmen higher than politicians, animated not by GREED or SELFISHNESS, by policy or party, I would familiarise the boys of the land with the characters of the Bible.'-

JOHN HALL.

*

 'The great difference between the real statesman and the pretender is, that the one sees into the future, while the other regards only the present; the one lives by the day, and acts on expediency; the other acts on enduring principles and immortality.'-

 *

'What morality requires, true statesmanship should accept.'-

EDMUND BURKE

(On of our greatest parliamentarians of the 18th century.)

*

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

APRIL 22-2017

 

        H. F .1176-    FREEDOM- WITH OUR LAWS-CUSTOM AND COUNTRY WILL SOON BE OURS!

 

 
*

DAILY MAIL

 

 

'Doomsayers ready to declare City is on sliding slope to
decline'.

by

ALEX BRUMMER

CITY EDITOR IN WASHINGTON

APRIL 24,2017

 

Breaking up isn't  hard to do

 

The International Monetary Fund is being unhelpful again. It now acknowledges that Britain is resilient and so far has steered clear of the economic shoals presented by

Brexit

and has turned critical attention to the City’s leadership as a financial centre.

Anyone reading about Brexit in the Global Financial Stability Report might conclude that the Square Mile escaped the Great Fire of London, two world wars, the gold standard and the financial crisis but finally threw in the towel under the weight of reams of pages of euro-regulation and the ambition of other European capitals. 

Indeed, haven’t the likes of Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Barclays and Lloyds’s of London insurance market already headed for the exit?

Such is the wishful thinking of doomsayers ready to declare the Square Mile is on the sliding slope to decline and obliteration.

Talk to those most intimately involved in day-to-day financial regulation and stability and the picture is remarkably different. 

The first and most significant point that is that while Paris, Frankfurt, Brussels or even Dublin may have their minor victories, when small teams of traders are moved offshore as Brexit insurance, most of Europe doesn’t want what Britain has.

Being a world financial sector carries enormous trading risks. It requires financial institutions to be generously capitalised but it also relies upon the commitment of central banks/and governments to stand behind those risks.

As we know from the eurozone crisis Germany may be swimming in reserves but history inures it to risk taking. 

France simply doesn’t have the financial infrastructure to compete and its high taxation economy means it is uniquely unattractive to the finance sector. As for Dublin and Brussels they are simply not in the game.

Remember when Irish banking almost vanished below the waves in 2008? It was the UK government, not the eurozone which rushed to Dublin’s side with emergency credits. 

Put it another way is there another jurisdiction in Europe where the government would be prepared and understand the necessity for a banking system that is four times the size of the nation’s total output? The thought is ridiculous.

Secondly, we have the bizarre argument coming from some European politicians that London, outside the EU, cannot possibly be the vortex, or as it is at present, the main centre for clearing and settling transactions in euros such as interest rate swaps. 

In effect such thoughts represent a narrow ‘euro’ nationalism which flies in the face of multinational trade and globalisation.

When some years ago Canadian authorities decided that Toronto’s financial system did not have the capacity, experience or the depth to clear instruments denominated in Canadian dollars it decided to use LCH Clearnet as it principle exchange. 

Indeed, London is used by banks around the world, including those on Wall Street, to clear dollar and other foreign currency transactions.

You want the best deal and the maximum liquidity you go to the markets best able to provide not an overpriced, illiquid flag carrier.

Finally, there is the vexed question of the quality of regulation or as Europeans like to call it ‘equivalence.’ 

Give both sides in the Article 50 negotiations start from exactly the same place and given that many rules were created by the UK anyway because it has the most complex markets it ought to be a non-issue. All that is required is some kind of arbitration or disputes procedure when there is a problem.

Sounds simple doesn’t it? Then why except out of bloody-mindedness make it difficult.


Read more: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-4437948/ALEX-BRUMMER-Doomsayers-ready-declare-City-sliding-slope.html#ixzz4fAviYXsA
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

Full article

APRIL 24,2017

H.F.1178 BREXIT- AND THE RETURN OF A  FREE WORLD TRADING NATION

 

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR..

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

WHY

 DOESN'T

 the

House of  Lords

move

to

BRUSSELS?

RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-

March 3, 2017

Why doesn't the House of Lords move to

BRUSSELS?

 
 

EXTRACT

NOT for the FIRST TIME, it fell to Norman Tebbit to speak for Britain.

Why was it, he asked his fellow members of the Lords, that they were elevating the

RIGHTS OF FOREIGNERS

over those of the

BRITISH PEOPLE.

'It seems to me the

FIRST DUTY of PARLIAMENT

of the

UNITED KINGDOM

is to care for the

INTERESTS OF THE CITIZENS OF THIS KINGDOM'

he  said.

'If we are to be concerned about the rights of anybody after

BREXIT

to live anywhere on this continent of Europe, it should be concern for the

RIGHTS  OF BRITISH PEOPLE

to live freely and peacefully in those other parts of Europe.

WHY

is everybody here today so excited about an amendment which looks after

FOREIGNERS

and

 NOT

THE BRITISH

Fair point. But judging by the reaction in the chamber, you'd have thought Norman had advocated rounding up all foreign nationals living in Britain and deporting them en masse, preferably by gunpoint. His perfectly accurate use of the word

'FOREIGNERS'

had some sensitive Lords and Ladies gasping for their breath and hissing their disapproval at this ghastly racist in their midst.

 Lord Skinhead of Chingford was, of course. merely questioning the demand that before triggering

ARTICLE 50

[ March 15 -2017?]

Theresa May gives a cast iron guarantee that

ALL

EU CITIZENS living in Britain will be allowed to stay after Brexit.

Actually, she's already tried to do that in exchange for a reciprocal assurance that the same will apply to UK citizens living in Europe.

BUT

she was knocked back by

ANGELA MERKEL

who refuses to enter any kind of negotiation until  the Brexit process is under way.

It has become almost compulsory for everyone to agree that those EU nationals who have settled here-keep the

RIGHT TO STAY.

AND it,s true that the majority of EU citizens who have arrived legally over the past few years make a valuable contribution to our economy.

BUT

could the same be said of some of the less desirable elements who have moved to Britain?

The Eastern European beggars and pickpockets littering the streets of our cities for instance, or the assorted criminals we can't deport because of the

EUROPEAN YUMAN RITES RACKET.

The Remoaners don't want to talk about

THEM

naturally.

And frankly, the Lords aren't really bothered about the RIGHTS of EU citizens living in Britain.

It  is merely a convenient device to try to

DISRUPT and IDEALLY PREVENT BRITAIN'S DEPARTURE from THE

[UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-SO-CALLED]

EUROPEAN UNION...

They hold the democratically expressed wishes of more than 17 million voters in contempt and will do everything they can to frustrate the result of the

 REFERENDUM.

Why else would they want to force Mother Theresa to declare her negotiating position in advance?

No one in their right mind shows their cards before bidding in a poker game. Not unless that want to get taken to the cleaners.

No self-respecting union leader or businessman would offer up one-sided concessions before negotiations had ever begun.

What the Remoaners refuse to accept is that Britain holds the winning hand. We buy more from the EU than they buy from us.

The Europeans realise that, which is why they are going to bluff for as long as possible. Can you imagine any politician in Europe behaving like the

REMAIN CAMP in BRITAIN?

Where's the European equivalent of

PROJECT FEAR, warning of the dire consequences of losing access to the lucrative BRITISH MARKET?

Where are the apocalyptic warning from the EUROPEAN BANK that millions of jobs will be lost and the EU will go into FINANCIAL MELTDOWN unless BRUSSELS can strike a favourable DEAL WITH THE UK?

Where are the demands in Britain that Mrs Merkel offers

BRITISH MANUFACTURERS FREE TRADE

for BMW, Mercedes and Audi being allowed to continue to selling

TARIFF-FREE in BRITAIN.

WHERE'S Holland's answer to Anna Soubry touring the TV and radio studios in the Netherlands, complaining tearfully that the Dutch economy is doomed unless they give Britain everything she wants?

Why aren't French hardliners marching down the Champs Elysees, smashing windows and setting fire to police cars, demanding that Paris must agree unconditionally to BRITAIN'S TERMS so they can carry on exporting thie

CHEESES, WINES and MEAT? I don't recall the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT passing a MOTION forcing Jean-Claude Drunker to make any concessions to BRITAIN before the FORMAL BREXIT TALKS START.

And unless I've missed something, how many former

 GERMAN CHANCELLORS-FRENCH PRESIDENTS and ITALIAN PRIME MINISTERS have OPENLY SIDED WITH BRITAIN, in the same way that

 BLAIR and MAJOR

HAVE BACKED EUROPE AGAINST THEIR OWN PEOPLE?

NO,

all we've heard from across the CHANNEL are THREATS to PUNISH US, to CRIPPLE US ECONOMICALLY, to MAKE OUR LIVES HELL ONCE WE ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO LEAVE THE EU.

YET

the overwhelming instinct of our

TRAITOROUS

POLITICAL CLASS

is to bind the hands of our negotiators, to

APPEASE, COMPROMISE and ultimately SURRENDER-with the UNELECTED HOUSE OF LORDS acting as a PRO-BRUSSELS FIFTH COLUMN,

determined to

BETRAY THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE THEY ARE PAID TO REPRESENT..

Are they setting themselves up as

EU's VICHY GOVERNMENT?

MAYBE THEY SHOULD MOVE TO BRUSSELS.

IN wartime, they'd have been put up against a wall and shot

[AND THERE WOULD BE PLENTY OF VOLUNTEERS TO DO JUST THIS TODAY IN MARCH 2017.]

It's a pity Norman Tebbit isn't a few years younger. We could have put him in charge of the Brexit negotiations.

AT LEAST HE'D SPEAK FOR BRITAIN.

*  *  *

 

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MARCH 3 -2017

H. F.1126 FREEDOM NOW

EU fatcats want BRITAIN to help fund their £166,000 gold-plated pensions for decades to come

 

  • Brussels expects Britain to fund its £55 billion pension pot for decades to come
  • It would give the average EU official £59,000 and the top officials £166,000
  • The average Brussels pension payout is more than twice the UK average salary 
  • Theresa May would face intense criticism from MPs if she agrees to foot the bill 

 

According to analysts, Brussels could demand between £4.4 billion and £5.7 billion from the UK for its pension pot during Brexit negotiations.

Theresa May would face intense criticism if she agrees to foot the bill for lining the pockets of thousands including a string of Remain-supporting British peers.

At £59,000, the average Brussels pension payout is more than twice the UK average salary.

And it is almost three times the average income of £21,800 for a retired household in the UK at the end of last year.

About 1,730 Britons are among the 22,000 retired EU officials currently benefiting from the scheme – which cost EU taxpayers £1.3 billion in 2015 – including high-ranking British politicians. One of the most generously rewarded is former Labour leader Lord Kinnock, who draws an estimated £87,800 every year from his role as vice president of the European Commission.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4524310/EU-want-Britain-fund-166-000-pensions.html#ixzz4hthOtx6Q
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

EU museum that cost £47m opens ten years late: Controversial project is still not complete despite grand opening at the weekend 

By Mario Ledwith Brussels Correspondent For The Daily Mail - May 5th 2017, 12:59:24 am

The £47million House of European History, which has been described as a vanity project, has caused years of uproar due to its soaring cost and repeated construction delays

 

[TYPICAL EU MINDSET- SIMPLE!-THEY DO WHAT THEY WANT FIRST AND LATER LET THE FUTURE DEAL WITH IT! - IT IS A BANKRUPT SCENARIO KEPT GOING BY THE FEW  MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS AND ONLY WHEN ONE LEAVES THE EU -ONLY THEN DOES REALITY REAR ITS HEAD. THE FIRMER UK IS IN ITS STANCE NOT TO BE SUBJECT TO BLACKMAIL AND PAY ONLY WHAT  IS RIGHT IN LAW AND WITH THIS IN MIND THE MORE CHANCE THAT OTHER MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS WILL LEAVE THE WASTEFUL- EXPENSIVE- ELITIST -UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE CLUB.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1200 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

Is Europe committing suicide?

Controversial book claims elites in UK and the Continent

are encouraging mass immigration because

they've lost faith in historic

Christian values

Is Europe committing suicide? Controversial book claims

elites in UK and the Continent are encouraging mass immigration

because they've lost faith in historic Christian values 

Journalist Douglas Murray writes in his new book 

The Strange Death Of Europe that our political leaders have

knowingly colluded in the ‘mass movement

of peoples into Europe’.

 

  A couple of days ago, I saw TV footage of the outspoken Labour MP Jess Phillips on the campaign trail, seeking re-election in her suburban Birmingham constituency.

She was asked which issues voters mentioned most often on the doorstep. Ms Phillips did not miss a beat.

Immigration comes up...’ she said thoughtfully. And then, as if remembering herself, she started talking about bin collections instead.

It was, I thought, an enormously revealing moment. For there is no issue so potentially dangerous as immigration. Many people have intense feelings about it, and many feel unable to raise them publicly.

Even in private, self-consciously tolerant people discuss immigration very tentatively, if at all.

The shadow of Enoch Powell — the Birmingham-born Tory who was cast into the wilderness after his controversial speech in 1968 about ‘rivers of blood’ (a phrase he never actually used) — still hangs over the debate.

A few years ago, I was at a lunch in London, sitting next to the former editor of a national newspaper and the editor of one of Britain’s best-known magazines, both of them highly educated and liberal-minded people. The subject turned to immigration.

‘It’s gone much too far,’ one said. ‘You’re quite right,’ said the other, ‘but of course you can’t say so.’

The journalist Douglas Murray has no such qualms. Best known for his acerbic columns in the Spectator magazine and his prize-winning book on the Bloody Sunday inquiry, he has just hurled a literary hand grenade into the debate about immigration and identity in today’s Europe.

Indeed, the opening lines of his new book, The Strange Death Of Europe, could hardly be more incendiary.

‘Europe is committing suicide,’ Murray writes. ‘Or at least its leaders have decided to commit suicide... As a result, by the end of the lifespans of most people currently alive, Europe will not be Europe and the peoples of Europe will have lost the only place in the world we had to call home.’

The causes, he thinks, are twofold. First, our political leaders have knowingly colluded in the ‘mass movement of peoples into Europe’, filling ‘cold and rainy northern towns’ with ‘people dressed for the foothills of Pakistan or the sandstorms of Arabia’.

Second, he believes Europe’s intellectual and cultural elites, including those in Britain, have ‘lost faith in its beliefs, traditions and legitimacy’. Crippled with guilt, obsessed with atoning for the sins of empire, they have lost sight of the historic Christian values that their people expect them to defend.

As a result of their deluded utopianism, Murray thinks, Europe is ceasing to be Europe. Indeed, he believes that European culture as generations have understood it — the culture of Michelangelo and Mozart, Shakespeare and Goethe, Dickens and Wagner — is doomed.

‘Instead of remaining a home for the European peoples,’ he writes, ‘we have decided to become a “utopia” only in the original Greek sense of the word: to become “no place”.’

You will not be surprised to hear that Murray’s book has gone down badly with the bien-pensant types at The Guardian, whose reviewer described it as ‘gentrified xenophobia’ and a ‘slightly posher’ version of ‘naked racism’.

In its way, that verdict tells you all you need to know about the intellectual blinkers of the liberal intelligentsia.

I opened Murray’s book this week with slight scepticism, and I still think he overdoes the apocalyptic negativity.

Even so, at the risk of being accused of xenophobia by The Guardian — which would admittedly put me in crowded company — I believe he has penetrated closer to the heart of our current discontents than legions of liberal academics.

For one thing, it is refreshing to get some honesty about the historically unprecedented nature of immigration into Europe in the past 70 years.

In case you need reminding, the figures for Britain alone are simply mind-boggling.

Between 1997 and 2010, for example, the last Labour government allowed a staggering 2.2 million people to settle in this country, the equivalent of two Birminghams.

Under David Cameron, the Tories promised to reduce immigration to the tens of thousands. Yet the latest figures show that annual net migration is about 273,000, roughly a city the size of Hull arriving every year.

It is worth noting, by the way, that mass immigration has always been immensely unpopular. When I wrote a history of Britain in the Sixties, I could hardly fail to notice that even back then, at least seven out of ten people were dead against it, as shown by the deluge of approving letters that greeted Enoch Powell’s supposedly toxic speech.

Maybe his admirers were wrong; maybe they weren’t. But whatever your own view of immigration, there has never been an issue on which the political class has so consistently gone against the wishes of the British people.

At this point in the argument, your standard liberal academic would typically interject to insist that Britain has always been a nation of immigrants. We all come from somewhere else anyway, they say, we are all mongrels, so how dare we close the gates to a few more?

But as Douglas Murray shows, this is a shameless rewriting of our past. For most of our history, we have never been a nation of immigrants. Even the most famous influx in our history, the Norman Conquest, involved a tiny population transfer, the equivalent of no more than 5 per cent or so.

As much as the BBC and other news organisations like to pretend that Britain has always been a beacon of diversity, the plain fact is that until the mid-20th century the massive, overwhelming majority of the people who lived here had been born here. Look at photo after photo from late Victorian London and the uniformly pale faces stare back at you.

The arrival of the French Huguenots in the 1680s, often cited by apostles of diversity, involved about 50,000 people, all of whom were white and Christian.

And although the Irish migrants who arrived in the 19th century faced more than their fair share of prejudice, our islands’ interlinked histories meant they were far from complete outsiders.

Liberal-minded types often find this embarrassing. Either they try to rewrite our history, relentlessly playing up the presence of tiny minorities of Africans and Asians, or they peddle a caricature of pre-Fifties Britain as a grey, boring place, which desperately needed an injection of immigrant colour.

This is not just a British hang-up. As Murray writes, European liberals love to paint their own societies as ‘slightly boring or staid places’. They write as if ‘there is a hole at the heart of Europe which needs filling and without which we would otherwise be poorer’.

(By the way, this is something they would never dream of saying about countries such as Bhutan or Burkina Faso. Nobody ever suggests that what these unforgivably monoracial countries need is an influx of migrants from Surrey.)

As a superbly damning example, Murray gives us the views of the impeccably liberal Fredrik Reinfeldt, Sweden’s Prime Minister between 2006 and 2014, who enjoyed the dubious reputation of being the ‘Scandinavian David Cameron’. He was a passionate advocate of mass immigration. Swedish people, he once said, were ‘boring’, while national borders were ‘fictional’ constructs.

And in a perfect illustration of what Murray sees as the European elite’s chronic self-flagellation, Mr Reinfeldt even declared that ‘only barbarism is genuinely Swedish. All further development has been brought from outside’. 

This would have come as a shock to the Swedish playwright August Strindberg, the film director Ingmar Bergman and the members of Abba, not to mention their countrymen who invented the seatbelt and the pacemaker.

In any case, the results of Mr Reinfeldt’s liberal utopianism have been staggering. With just 10 million people, Sweden has taken in more refugees per capita than any other country. In 2015 alone, it accepted 180,000 incomers — more than the population of all but the three largest Swedish cities.

In recent months, the relationship between immigration and crime in Sweden has become hugely controversial. This is thanks largely to Donald Trump’s comments about ‘riots’ in Sweden based on a report on Fox News, which blamed an alleged breakdown in law and order in the country on an influx of migrants over the past 20 years.

But as Murray suggests, the really telling story is surely the rise of the far-Right Sweden Democrats — a nationalistic, anti-immigrant party that has come from nowhere to lead the opinion polls for the past two years. And this not in Thirties Germany but in 21st-century Sweden, ostensibly one of the most contented, tolerant and egalitarian societies on Earth!

It would, I think, be unforgivably lazy to blame this on the supposed racism of the great unwashed, as liberal intellectuals love to do.

In fact, almost every indicator shows that old-fashioned, poisonous prejudice has virtually died out, not just here in Britain, but across much of Western Europe.

Whatever The Guardian might think, Murray himself is not racist. Indeed, he writes movingly about the plight of the thousands of refugees who have paid up to $1,500 (£1,150) each to travel on dangerous boats across the Mediterranean. As he remarks, any decent person should want to help them, not to ‘push them back into the sea’.

His own approach, by the way, would be for European countries to invest in holding centres in North Africa and to grant refugees asylum for a limited period only.

Whether this would work is impossible to say. But could it really be worse than the free-for-all of the past few years?

But I suspect his trenchant dismissal of all those naive liberal pieties will strike a chord with people in every corner of our political landscape. He pours scorn, for example, on the argument that immigration has magically made us a more tolerant society.

A survey of attitudes to homosexuality in 2015 found that just 16 per cent of people outside London thought it was morally wrong. The figure in London was 29 per cent, reflecting the much higher concentration of conservative Muslims.

Indeed, that conflict between Islamic fundamentalism and British tolerance is a sadly familiar story, from the death threats to the author Salman Rushdie over his novel The Satanic Verses to the horrific murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby by two Islamist converts.

Murray should have made it clearer, I think, that the vast majority of British Muslims are decent, peaceful, law-abiding citizens. Even so, he is absolutely right to argue that, for far too long, our political and cultural elites have been so afraid of being called racist that they have allowed Islamic extremists to fester unchecked.

[The point that has not been mentioned is that with such a large Muslim population in England - approximately 3 million plus with a birth rate of 4-1 and take their future partners from their own village in their former homeland -Pakistan or wherever and because of the politically-correct useful idiots in our midst in a generation it will have the numbers to plan for their ISLAMIC STATE with complete SHARIA LAW and all that it entails.]

Yet even now, the European political elite are desperate to silence their critics. Indeed, two stories from Murray’s book genuinely shocked me.

The first comes from September 2015, when German Chancellor Angela Merkel reportedly asked Facebook’s founder Mark Zuckerberg what he was doing to stop people criticising her open-door migration policy on his site. ‘Are you working on this?’ she asked him — and he said that he was.

My shock was twofold: that she felt entitled to ask him to shut down her critics, and that he meekly said he was doing it.

The second also comes from Germany. A month later, in the small city of Kassel, 800 migrants were due to arrive under Mrs Merkel’s scheme, so the authorities held a public meeting.

But when residents began to voice their concerns, the district president, Walter Lubcke, spoke up. Admitting immigrants, he said, was the German way. Anybody who did not agree, he added, was ‘free to leave Germany’.

[SUCH ARROGANCE FROM AN OFFICIAL OF A SUPPOSED DEMOCRATIC GERMANY-ONE CAN SEE WHERE THE EU OFFICIALS GET THEIR LEAD-TREAT THE PEOPLE WITH UTTER DISTAIN]

This is outrageous, I think, not just because it is so arrogant, but because it is so counter-productive. For the past 50 years, the European political elite have been telling the people that they are wrong.

When the voters refuse to listen, the elite merely take that as proof that they need another dose of diversity to break their resistance once and for all. And so the dialogue of the deaf goes on.

Whether this really marks the end of European civilisation, as Murray claims, is a matter of opinion. I think he is far too pessimistic, although if I lived somewhere like the concrete Parisian suburb of Saint-Denis, a crime-ridden ghetto with a heavily North African Muslim population, I might think differently.

What is certain, though, is that we need caustic, but honest, voices like his if we are ever going to have a genuine debate about all this.

For by shouting down and silencing the Douglas Murrays of this world, the bien-pensant liberals are merely handing yet more ammunition to the strutting demagogues of the extreme Right.

I cannot think of a more foolish and dangerous approach. After all, we have seen that story before. We all know how it ends.

FULL ARTICLE

 



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4524218/Book-claims-elites-UK-encouraging-mass-immigration.html#ixzz4huS0fXXZ
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

THE REALITY OF A INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1201 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 

About 5,990,000 results

 

    'Democracy and political Islam can't coexist' - International ...

    www.jpost.com/International/Democracy-and-political-Islam-cant-coexist
    18 Mar 2011 ... President of US Islamic Forum for Democracy tells 'Post' American Islamic ...
    declaration – the Organization of the Islamic Conference countries ...

     

    An Islamic Democracy Cannot Exist - Opposing Viewpoints in Context

    ic.galegroup.com/.../DocumentToolsPortletWindow?...
    In the viewpoint that follows, the author claims democracy-building in Iraq and
    other Islamic countries cannot be a short-term goal of U.S. foreign policy.

     

    In Theory: Can Islam and democracy coexist? - LA Times

    www.latimes.com/tn-vsl-0224-intheory-story.html
    23 Feb 2011 ... But can democracy take root in an Islamic society? .... So yes, I believe it is
    entirely possible for a democratic Muslim state to exist and be successful. ... If
    democracy cannot co-exist with Islam, then what does that say of Islam?

     

    Why Western democracy can never work in the Middle East ...

    www.telegraph.co.uk/.../Why-Western-democracy-can-never-work-in-the-Middle-East.html
    16 Aug 2014 ... One million people have been displaced since Islamic State militants ... Yet who
    in those countries today could survey the Middle East and believe ... a position to
    direct air strikes, we cannot allow “mission creep” to take over.

     

    Can Islam and Democracy Coexist? - National Geographic

    news.nationalgeographic.com/.../1021_031021_islamicdemocracy_2.html
    Two Islam experts argue that democracy is consistent with Islam—but what ... But
    I think we have to keep in mind we can't push democracy down the throat of
    anyone. ... "In countries such as Yemen and Jordan where they've had a pluralist
    ...

     

    Islam and Democracy - DebateWise

    debatewise.org/debates/2724-islam-and-democracy/
    Islamic states lack civil society where democratic debate and pressure can be ...
    The Muslim world cannot be democratic until it reforms its position on women. ....
    Legislative assemblies can exist and elections can take place so long as they ...

     

    The Islamic State: An Alternative to Democracy and Secularism ...

    www.worldsecuritynetwork.com/Democracy.../The-Islamic-State-An-Alternative-to-Democracy-and-Secularism
    The Islamic State: An Alternative to Democracy and Secularism? ... Although
    many voices call for a secular political system in the Arab countries, there are
    also ... However, we cannot stop wondering: What about the pursuit of knowledge
    , or `ilm and ... Disillusionment with democracy may exist because the
    democracies that ...

     

    BBC News | TALKING POINT | Can Islamic government work?

    news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/643629.stm
    24 Feb 2000 ... Elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran on Friday are the latest round in a ... their
    self as Christian countries, Iran can also be Democracy while practising Islam
    and ... Until we can freely direct our own destiny, we cannot fulfil our potential. ...
    Because one is an atheist does not mean that God does not exist.

     

    Wholly Different: Why I Chose Biblical Values Over Islamic Values - Google Books Result

    https://books.google.co.uk/books?isbn=1621576027
    Nonie Darwish - ‎2017 - Religion
    Instead the ultimate goal is to unify the world under a universal Islamic state, the
    ... for power in a majorityMuslim country, where democratic values cannot exist.

    Islam and Democracy | Shia Political Thought | Books on Islam and ...

    https://www.al-islam.org/shia-political.../islam-and-democracy
    Muslim thinkers who deal with political debates cannot ignore the .... However
    modern democracies within nation- states exist on a much greater scale than ...

     

 

MAY-2017

H.F.1204

The old guard simply refuses to hand over the financial system so it will have to be replaced

The old guard that hijacked the world’s financial system is stubbornly refusing to cede control over the process of creating dollars, euros and yen to the people of the planet earth. This was evident when Rothschild lawyer and Mossad agent Michael Greenberg visited the Japanese Emperor last week to demand unlimited funds for him and his fellow Khazarian gangsters, according to sources close to the Emperor. Greenberg also claimed to be representing Henry Kissinger who is now back, together with Greenberg, on the high priority target list of known genocidal criminals.

The Emperor was furious at Greenberg and blamed him and his slaves, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Finance Minister Taro Aso, for blocking the release of funds meant for the people of the planet, the sources added.

This means that in order to start a new age and liberate the planet, a two pronged attack will be needed. One will be to continue to eliminate old guard genocidal leaders one by one until the Khazarian mob finally surrenders. The other will be to continue to build an alternative financial system, based on gold, crypto-currencies and non-Khazarian currencies until the old system withers at the vine and drops into the compost heap of history. This two pronged attack is already fully under way.

The big question mark now, though, is what to make of Pope Francis. Forensic research has shown that most of the so-called world leaders we see on our TV screens and in public are controlled by the P2 Freemason lodge via the Vatican bank and a network of professional assassins. In other words most world leaders, when offered a choice between silver (a bribe) and lead (a bullet), have taken the Vatican bank silver.

Pope Francis, who has incredible secret power at his disposal, has, on the one hand, been purging the Vatican of pedophiles and saying and doing nice things but, on the other hand, he has failed to change the system at a fundamental level by doing such things as declaring a real jubilee (cancellation of all debt etc.).

Which brings us to finally deal with some information we have had for a long time but were not sure what to make of, and that is the fact Francis has openly said his god is Lucifer.

https://newsgru.com/lucifer-is-god-declared-by-pope-francis/

What is the role of the Luciferians as US President Donald Trump, the nominal head of the Western military industrial complex, carries out his tour of the top monotheistic holy spots, Arabia (notice he was not allowed into Mecca), Jerusalem and Rome? The question is, is Trump on a trip to try to save the old regime (Lucifer?) or is he aiming for something more historic, like initiating the dawn of a golden age?

Pentagon sources say that while Trump was in Saudi Arabia this past weekend, apart from making a $350 billion arms deal, he

.

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

 

 

 

Posted by benjamin
May 22, 2017

 

H.F.1206.

 
A NEW BEGINNING!

ON

JUNE 8 -2017

WITH BREXIT

FOR THE FUTURE!

THE NATION'S MAIN CONCERN SHOULD BE THAT ALL POLITICAL PARTIES PARTICIPATING IN THE COMING GENERAL ELECTION TO SHUT UP! AND ADMIT THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RIGHT! ABOUT A GREAT DEAL  OVER THE LAST 45 YEARS-NO DOUBT LONGER .  THE GRAVE ERRORS HAVE OCCURRED ACROSS THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM. IT IS TIME FOR A NEW START!  IT IS THE FUTURE THAT MATTERS FOR EVERYONE! THE NEED IN OUR ELECTORAL SYSTEM OF A HEALTHY OPPOSITION AND STRONG GOVERNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL IS BEYOND DOUBT - FORGET THE MISTAKES OF THE PAST AND PLAN FOR A GREAT FUTURE AS OTHERS AROUND THE WORLD EXPECT OF US. A STRONG VIBRANT ECONOMY-A SENSIBLE  FRIENDLY FOREIGN POLICY AND A UNIQUE PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY WITH A RECOVERED AND EMBEDDED CHRISTIAN ETHIC WHICH THE WORLD  SHOULD EXPECT OF US.

THE WORLD AS WE ALL KNOW  IS CHANGING AS MANY OF YOU ARE NOW AWARE WITH A NEW DEAL FOR MANKIND WITH A GREAT OPPORTUNITY FOR A MORE PEACEFUL AND HAPPY WORLD FOR ALL ITS INHABITANTS.

BREXIT MUST SUCCEED !

VOTE TO ENSURE IT'S

SUCCESS

ON

JUNE 8-2017

*

'To climb steep hills requires slow pace at first.'

Shakespeare.

 

'The first beginnings; look to the budding mischief before it has time to ripen to maturity.-'

 SHAKESPEARE

'Any man may make a mistake, but none but a fool will continue in it-

CICERO

 

'No man ever became great or good except through many and great mistakes.'-

GLADSTONE

*

'The test of every religious, political or educational system is the man which it forms.'-

AMIEL Henri Frederic.Swiss philosopher (1821-81)

*

MAY 29-2017

 

H.F.1207 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER.

 
 

Fake Terrorism: The Road to Dictatorship

Michael Rivero – What Really Happened.com

It’s the oldest trick in the book, dating back to Roman times; creating the enemies you need.

In 70 BC, an ambitious minor politician and extremely wealthy man, Marcus Licineus Crassus, wanted to rule Rome. Just to give you an idea of what sort of man Crassus really was, he is credited with invention of the fire brigade. But in Crassus’ version, his fire-fighting slaves would race to the scene of a burning building whereupon Crassus would offer to buy it on the spot for a tiny fraction of it’s worth. If the owner sold, Crassus’ slaves would put out the fire. If the owner refused to sell, Crassus allowed the building to burn to the ground. By means of this device, Crassus eventually came to be the largest single private landholder in Rome, and used some of his wealth to help back Julius Caesar against Cicero.

In 70 BC Rome was still a Republic, which placed very strict limits on what Rulers could do, and more importantly NOT do. But Crassus had no intentions of enduring such limits to his personal power, and contrived a plan.

Crassus seized upon the slave revolt led by Sparticus in order to strike terror into the hearts of Rome, whose garrison Sparticus had already defeated in battle. But Sparticus had no intention of marching on Rome itself, a move he knew to be suicidal. Sparticus and his band wanted nothing to do with the Roman empire and had planned from the start merely to loot enough money from their former owners in the Italian countryside to hire a mercenary fleet in which to sail to freedom.

Sailing away was the last thing Crassus wanted Sparticus to do. He needed a convenient enemy with which to terrorize Rome itself for his personal political gain. So Crassus bribed the mercenary fleet to sail without Sparticus, then positioned two Roman legions in such a way that Sparticus had no choice but to march on Rome.

Terrified of the impending arrival of the much-feared army of gladiators, Rome declared Crassus Praetor. Crassus then crushed Sparticus’ army and even though Pompeii took the credit, Crassus was elected Consul of Rome the following year.

With this maneuver, the Romans surrendered their Republican form of government. Soon would follow the first Triumvirate, consisting of Crassus, Pompeii, and Julius Caesar, followed by the reign of the god-like Emperors of Rome.

The Romans were hoaxed into surrendering their Republic, and accepting the rule of Emperors.

Julius Caesar’s political opponent, Cicero, for all his literary accomplishments, played the same games in his campaign against Julius Caesar, claiming that Rome was falling victim to an internal “vast right wing” conspiracy in which any expressed desire for legislative limits on government was treated as suspicious behavior. Cicero, in order to demonstrate to the Romans just how unsafe Rome has become hired thugs to cause as much disturbance as possible, and campaigned on a promise to end the internal strife if elected and granted extraordinary powers.

What Cicero only dreamed of, Adolph Hitler succeeded in doing. Elected Chancellor of Germany, Hitler, like Crassus, had no intention of living with the strict limits to his power imposed by German law. Unlike Cicero, Hitler’s thugs were easy to recognize; they all wore the same brown shirts. But their actions were no different than those of their Roman predecessors. They staged beatings, set fires, caused as much trouble as they could, while Hitler made speeches promising that he could end the crime wave of subversives and terrorism if he was granted extraordinary powers.

The Germans were hoaxed into surrendering their Republic, and accepting the rule of Der Fuhrer. The state-sponsored schools will never tell you this, but governments routinely rely on hoaxes to sell their agendas to an otherwise reluctant public. The Romans accepted the Emperors and the Germans accepted Hitler not because they wanted to, but because the carefully crafted illusions of threat appeared to leave no other choice.

Our government too uses hoaxes to create the illusion that We The People have no choice but the direction the government wishes us to go in.

In 1898, Joseph Pulitzer’s New York World and William Randolph Hearst’s New York Journal were arguing for American intervention in Cuba. Hearst is reported to have dispatched a photographer to Cuba to photograph the coming war with Spain. When the photographer asked just what war that might be, Hearst is reported to have replied, “You take the photographs, and I will provide the war”. Hearst was true to his word, as his newspaper published stories of great atrocities being committed against the Cuban people, most of which turned out to be complete fabrications.

On the night of February 15, 1898, the USS Maine, lying in Havana harbor in a show of US resolve to protect her interests, exploded violently. Captain Sigsbee, the commander of the Maine, urged that no assumptions of enemy attack be made until there was a full investigation of the cause of the explosion. For this, Captain Sigsbee was excoriated in the press for “refusing to see the obvious”. The Atlantic Monthly declared flat out that to suppose the explosion to be anything other than a deliberate act by Spain was “completely at defiance of the laws of probability.”

Under the slogan “Remember the Maine”, Americans went to war with Spain, eventually winning the Phillipines (and annexing Hawaii along the way).

In 1975, an investigation led by Admiral Hyman Rickover examined the data recovered from a 1911 examination of the wreck and concluded that there had been no evidence of an external explosion. The most likely cause of the sinking was a coal dust explosion in a coal bunker imprudently located next to the ship’s magazines. Captain Sigsbee’s caution had been well founded.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt needed a war. He needed the fever of a major war to mask the symptoms of a still deathly ill economy struggling back from the Great Depression (and mutating towards Socialism at the same time). Roosevelt wanted a war with Germany to stop Hitler, but despite several provocations in the Atlantic, the American people, still struggling with that troublesome economy, were opposed to any wars. Roosevelt violated neutrality with lend lease, and even ordered the sinking of several German ships in the Atlantic, but HItler refused to be provoked.

Roosevelt needed an enemy, and if America would not willingly attack that enemy, then one would have to be maneuvered into attacking America, much as Marcus Licinius Crassus has maneuvered Sparticus into attacking Rome.

The way open to war was created when Japan signed the tripartite agreement with Italy and Germany, with all parties pledging mutual defense to each other. Whereas Hitler would never declare war on the United States no matter the provocation, the means to force Japan to do so were readily at hand.

The first step was to place oil and steel embargoes on Japan, using Japan’s wars on the Asian mainland as a reason. This forced Japan to consider seizing the oil and mineral rich regions in Indonesia. With the European powers militarily exhausted by the war in Europe, the United States was the only power in the Pacific able to stop Japan from invading the Dutch East Indies, and by moving the Pacific fleet from San Diego to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, Roosevelt made a pre-emptive strike on that fleet the mandatory first step in any Japanese plan to extend it’s empire into the “southern resource area.”

Roosevelt boxed in Japan just as completely as Crassus had boxed in Sparticus. Japan needed oil. They had to invade Indonesia to get it, and to do that they first had to remove the threat of the American fleet at Pearl Harbor. There never really was any other course open to them.

To enrage the American people as much as possible, Roosevelt needed the first overt attack by Japan to be as bloody as possible, appearing as a sneak attack much as the Japanese had done to the Russians. From that moment up until the attack on Pearl Harbor itself, Roosevelt and his associates made sure that the commanders in Hawaii, General Short and Admiral Kimmel, were kept in the dark as much as possible about the location of the Japanese fleet and it’s intentions, then later scapegoated for the attack. (Congress recently exonerated both Short and Kimmel, posthumously restoring them to their former ranks).

But as the Army board had concluded at the time, and subsequent de-classified documents confirmed, Washington knew the attack was coming, knew exactly where the Japanese fleet was, and where it was headed.

On November 29th, Secretary of State Hull showed United Press reporter Joe Leib a message with the time and place of the attack, and the New York Times in it’s special 12/8/41 Pearl Harbor edition, on page 13, reported that the time and place of the attack had been known in advance!

The much repeated claim that the Japanese fleet maintained radio silence on it’s way to Hawaii was a lie. Among other intercepts still held in the Archives of the NSA is the UNCODED message sent by the Japanese tanker Shirya stating, “proceeding to a position 30.00 N, 154.20 E. Expect to arrive at that point on 3 December.” (near HI)

President Lyndon Johnson wanted a war in Vietnam. He wanted it to help his friends who owned defense companies to do a little business. He needed it to get the Pentagon and CIA to quit trying to invade Cuba. And most of all, he needed a provocation to convince the American people that there was really “no other choice”.

On August 5, 1964, newspapers across America reported “renewed attacks” against American destroyers operating in Vietnamese waters, specifically the Gulf of Tonkin. The official story was that North Vietnamese torpedo boats launched an “unprovoked attack” on the USS Maddox while it was on “routine patrol.”

The truth is that USS Maddox was involved in aggressive intelligence gathering in coordination with actual attacks by South Vietnam and the Laotian Air Force against targets in North Vietnam. The truth is also that there was no attack by torpedo boats against the USS Maddox. Captain John J. Herrick, the task force commander in the Gulf, cabled Washington DC that the report was the result of an “over-eager” sonarman who had picked up the sounds of his own ship’s screws and panicked. But even with this knowledge that the report was false, Lyndon Johnson went on national TV that night to announce the commencement of air strikes against North Vietnam, “retaliation” for an attack that had never occurred.

President George Bush wanted a war in Iraq. Like Crassus, George Bush is motivated by money. Specifically oil money. But with the OPEC alliance failing to keep limits on oil production in the Mideast, the market was being glutted with oil pumped from underneath Iraq, which sat over roughly 1/3 of the oil reserves of the entire region.

George wanted a war to stop that flow of oil, to keep prices (and profits) from falling any further than they already had. But like Roosevelt, he needed the “other side” to make the first move.

Iraq had long been trying to acquire greater access to the Persian Gulf, and felt limited, confined to a narrow strip of land along Kuwait’s northern border, which placed Iraqi interests in close proximity with hostile Iran. George Bush, who had been covertly arming Iraq during its war with Iran, sent word via April Glaspie (1) that the United States would not intervene if Saddam Hussein grabbed a larger part of Kuwait. Saddam fell for the bait and invaded.

Of course, Americans were not about to send their sons and daughters to risk their lives for petroleum products. So George Bush arranged a hoax, using public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which has grown rich on taxpayer money by being most industrious and creative liars! Hill & Knowlton concocted a monumental fraud in which the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the United States, went on TV pretending to be a nurse, and related a horror story in which Iraqi troops looted the incubators from a Kuwaiti hospital, leaving the premature babies on the cold floor to die. The media, part of the swindle from the start, never bothered asking why the “nurse” didn’t just pick the babies up and wrap them in blankets or something.

Enraged by the incubator story, Americans supported operation Desert Storm, which never removed Saddam Hussein from power but which did take Kuwait’s oil off of the market for almost 2 years and limited Iraq’s oil exports to this very day. That our sons and daughters came home with serious and lingering medical illnesses was apparently not too great a price to pay for increased oil profits.

Following the victory in Iraq, yet another war appeared to be in the offing in the mineral rich regions of Bosnia. Yet again, a hoax was used to create support for military action.

The photo of Fikret Alic, a Muslim, staring through a barbed wire fence, was used to “prove” that the Bosnians were running modern day “Concentration Camps”. As the headline of “Belsen 92” indicates, all possible associations with the Nazi horrors were made to sell the necessity of sending yet more American troops into someone else’s nation.

But when German Journalists went to Trnopolje, the site of the supposed Bosnian Concentration Camp. to film a documentary, they discovered that the photo was a fake! The camp at Trnopolje was not a concentration camp but a refugee center. Nor was it surrounded by barbed wire. Careful examination of the original photo revealed that the photographer had shot the photo through a broken section of fence surrounding a tool shed. It was the photographer who was on the inside, shooting out at the refugees.

Once again, Americans had been hoaxed into support of actions they might otherwise not have agreed with (2).

While several American Presidents have willingly started wars for personal purposes, perhaps no President has ever carried it to the extreme that Bill Clinton has.

Coincident with the expected public statement of Monica Lewinsky following her testimony, Bill Clinton ordered a cruise missile attack on Sudan and Afghanistan, claiming to have had irrefutable proof that bogeyman extraordinaire (and former Afghani ally) Osama Bin Ladin was creating terrorist chemical weapons there.

Examination of the photos of the debris revealed none of the expected structures one would find in a laboratory that handled lethal weapons-grade materials. Assurances from the CIA that they had a positive soil test for biological weapons fell on their face when it was revealed that there had been no open soil anywhere near the pre-bombed facility. Sudan requested that international observers come test the remains of the factory for any signs of the nerve gas Clinton had insisted was there. None was found. The Sudanese plant was a harmless aspirin factory, and the owner has sued for damages. Later examination of the site hit in Afghanistan revealed it to be a mosque.

Meanwhile, back in Kosovo, stories about genocide and atrocities were flooding the media (in time to distract from the Sudanese embarrassments), just as lurid and sensational and as it turns out often just as fictional as most of William Randolph Hearst’s stories of atrocities against the Cubans.

Again, the government and the media were hoaxing Americans. The above photo was shown on all the American networks, claiming to be one of Slobodan Milosovic’s Migs, shot down while attacking civilians. Closer examination shows it to be stenciled in English!

Like Germany under Chancellor Hitler, there have been events in our nation which strike fear into the hearts of the citizens, such as the New York World Trade Tower bombing, the OK City Federal Building, and the Olympic Park bomb (nicely timed to divert the media from witnesses to the TWA 800 shoot down). The media has been very quick to blame such events on “radicals”, “subversives”, “vast right wing conspiracies”, and other “enemies in our midst”, no different than the lies used by Cicero and Hitler.

But on closer examination, such “domestic terrorist” events do not appear to be what they are made out to be. The FBI had an informant inside the World Trade Tower bombers, Emad Salam, who offered to sabotage the bomb. The FBI told him “no”. The so-called “hot bed” of white separatism at Elohim City, occasional home to Tim McVeigh in the weeks prior to the OK City bombing, was founded and is being run by an FBI informant!

And nobody has ever really explained what this second Ryder truck was doing in a secret camp half way from Elohim City to Oklahoma City two weeks before the bombing. (See photo below)

So, here we are today. Like the Romans of Crassus’ and Cicero’s time, or the Germans under a newly elected Hitler, we are being warned that a dangerous enemy threatens us, implacable, invisible, omnipresent, and invulnerable as long as our government is hamstrung by that silly old Bill of Rights. Already there have appeared articles debating whether or not “extraordinary measures” (i.e. torture) are not fully justified under certain circumstances such as those we are purported to face.

As was the case in Rome and Germany, the government continues to plead with the public for an expansion of its power and authority, to “deal with the crisis”.

However, as Casio watch timers are paraded before the cameras, to the stentorian tones of the talking heads’ constant dire warnings, it is legitimate to question just how real the crises is, and how much is the result of political machinations by our own leaders.

Are the terrorists really a threat, or just hired actors with bombs and Casio watches, paid for by Cicero and given brown shirts to wear by Hitler?

Is terrorism inside the United States really from outside, or is it a stage managed production, designed to cause Americans to believe they have no choice but to surrender the Republic and accept the totalitarian rule of a new emperor, or a new Fuhrer?

Once lost, the Romans never got their Republic back. Once lost, the Germans never got their Republic back. In both cases, the nation had to totally collapse before freedom was restored to the people.

Remember that when Crassus tells you that Sparticus approaches.
Remember that when thugs in the streets act in a manner clearly designed to provoke the public fear. Remember that when the Reichstagg burns down.

(1) See Prologue to a Crisis: a transcript of a meeting between Saddam Hussein and US Ambassador Glaspie shortly before Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait:
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/oldsite/article.asp?ID=51

(2) See Tears of the Mighty by Jared Israel.
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/news/film.htm

JUNE 3-2017

H.F.1212 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

EU QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

There are over 1000 Bulletins on the EU in our

BULLETIN FILE and EU FILE

 CLICK FOR TOP TOPICS

JUNE -2009

1]  EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU ?

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10]    VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]    100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT1          100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT2

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007] -NOT MUCH LUCK HERE!

33]    ALMOST 50% OF EU BUDGET SPENT ON CAP FATCATS

34] SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU

35] WHY BRITISH BUSINESS IS TURNING AGAINST THE EU

36] BRITISH CONSTITUTION-IDENTITY AND VALUES

37] MODERN DILEMA IN POLITICS-TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM.

38] LETTER FROM LORD KILMUIR TO TED HEATH WITH TRUE FACTS OF EU

39] INTERVIEW WITH RUSSIAN DISSIDENT WHO WARNED OF EU DICTATORSHIP

40]   The Truth About A Federal Europe - Part I

41]   Cost of EU to UK - £4,811 million in 2003= 40 District Hospitals equipped and staffed and funded.

42]  CAN THE 1972 ACCESSION TREATY TO THE EU BE REPEALED?

43]  Neil Kinnock in glover - but failed to stop the Shadow of graft over EU’s £68bn spending.

44]  Now the EU wants a single Foreign Office to replace Nation-States Embassies.

45]   How the EU takes over Nation-States.

46]  A Fabian Europhile of 1947 supported Independent Nation-States and the Rule of Law

47]       The New European Constitution - Part 1

48]  12-Point Summary of EU Constitution continued - Part 2

49]  The New European Constitution - Part 1

50]  An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.

51]   Britain takes over as biggest contributor to the EU Budget

52]  Neil Kinnock sacked honest Auditor because of refusal to sign off questionable EU Accounts.

53]  General De Gaulle acclaims British national institutions back in 1960.

54]  Brussels scams can let an MEP fiddle £60,000 a year.

55]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 1

56]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 2

57]  Europe and a conspiracy of Silence.

58]  Ninety-nine countries will soon have Free Trade with EU -without paying a cent to Brussels.

59]   Britain must leave the EU as UN show best area for expansion will be USA-Anglo.Saxon sphere.

60]  82 million Germans have no say as MP’s back EU Constitution.

61]  The EU big brother policy reaches back over two millennium.

62]   Europe: It’s the modern version of the white man’s burden.

63]   E U COUNCIL OF MINISTERS.

64]  EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.

65] German - Nazi - Geopolitical Centre established in Madrid in 1943 by Heinrich Himmler.

66]  What were the Dark Actors Playing Games, which the patriot Dr David Kelly referred?

67]  DEMOCRACY IS A DIALECTICAL FARCE BECAUSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES CALL THE SHOTS NOT SO-CALLED DEMOCRACIES.

68]  Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

69]  EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE.

70]  NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

71]   WHY NO TREATY LIMITING EU POWERS

72]   THE E.U.’S VERY OWN AESOPIAN LANGUAGE.

73]    WHAT IF ENGLAND HADN'T JOINED THE EU

74]   67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM EU

75]   WILL IRELAND SAVE EUROPE FROM ITSELF?

76]   WHY EU REGIONAL POLICY WILL DESTROY THE NATION STATE

77]   EMPIRES HAVE GONE AND MOST PEOPLE LIVE IN NATION STATES.

78 THE FINAL BETRAYAL- WHICH TOOK PLACE IN 2008 

79]  WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR-NOW BROWN-SHE DIDN'T - BUT SOLD US TO THE EU80] 

80]  Almost everything ,which is precious in our civilisation, has come from small States

81]  THE EU BIG BROTHER POLICY REACHES BACK OVER TWO MILLENNIUM

82]   THE EURO A DOOMED CURRENCY

83]  GERMANY AS STRONG MAN OF EUROPE

84]  BRITAIN AND EUROPE-THE CULTURE OF DECEIT

85]  NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

86]  A BETTER WAY FORWARD TOGETHER IN EUROPE-OUT OF THE EUROPEAN UNIOn

87]   A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

88]   TO CONTROL OUR COURTS AND BORDERS IS THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL EUROSCEPTIC STRATEGY.

89] BLACK OPERATIONS AND TRICKERY BIND UK TO EU
90]  HITLER-HAUSHOFER AND GEORGE KENNON-PENTAGON PLANS IDENTICAL
91]  Oh Boyo - Family on Brussels gravy train cost TAXPAYER £34 million and RISING!
92]   NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

93]    WHY DID THEY WANT BRITAIN IN EUROPE -  IN 1963

94]   Lies and The Betrayal of Britain
95]    Be Warned - The lies of 1975 still haunt us
96]   THe Strange Case of the Werner Report
97]   1972 EU Communities Act
98]   Further 200 Reasons why to Reject the Euro and E
99]  New elite threatens EU project admits Lib-Dem Peer
100]     The secretive Bilderberger Group will destroy True Democracy
101] BBC EUROPHILE BIAS-UPDATE-by LORD PEARSON

102]   How ‘a good European’ turned into a eurosceptic whistle-blower

103]   HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

104]    IF Gordon Brown forces this EU TREATY on us, you can kiss goodbye to DEMOCRACY  -HE DID!
105]   FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ARE THE FUTURE OF WORLD TRADE
106]   Twelve Mighty Reasons why you must say 'No' to the EU

107]        How much does it cost the UK in the EU

108]   THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL
109]   IF MONETARY UNION GOES-EUROPEAN PROJECT IS UNDERMINED
110]      THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN
111]      YOU CAN'T SEPARATE POLITICS AND MORALS
112]      IRAQ SOCIETY DESCENDING INTO CIVIL WAR BETWEEN SUNNIS - SHI-ITES AND KURDS
113]         TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND
 
 
 

www.eutruth.org.uk

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE-2009

H. F .11 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO

HITLER'S PLAN

 FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
 
 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3

JUNE 8-2017