JULY FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017 - (1994 -Official Website - JULY- PT2-2018 )-- JULY FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017

JULY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018         JULY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018         

JULY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018        JULY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018         

JULY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018        JULY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE- EU FILE  IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS-_FOREIGN AID FILE

*  *  *

Patriotic, optimistic and a world expert on trade deals: Why Theresa May must listen to top aide Crawford Falcone on Brexit (and not the rest of the defeatist civil service)

328

View
comments

 

For those in despair over the lack of progress on Brexit, as our political class trade blows and the entire process becomes bogged down in a quagmire of their making, there is a small corner of a government department that they can turn to for cheer.

It is the office of Crawford Falconer, Chief Trade Negotiation Adviser at the Department of International Trade, a man of immense experience in such matters. And, in contrast to the doomsayers, his message about Brexit is one of almost unbounded optimism.

Rather than get het up about every scintilla of the negotiating process, he insists on looking at the bigger picture, saying: ‘Keep your eye on the end game.’

 

It is the office of Crawford Falconer, Chief Trade Negotiation Adviser at the Department of International Trade, a man of immense experience in such matters. And, in contrast to the doomsayers, his message about Brexit is one of almost unbounded optimism

Thrive

He is convinced that after a period of psychological and economic adjustment to being outside the EU, Britain’s fortunes will thrive. He cannot understand why people are ‘so negative about our future’, and says the world is ‘begging’ to do trade deals with us.

Some will scoff, of course, saying his upbeat comments are simply the pipedream of a pro-Brexit ideologue.

But that could not be further from the truth. For Falconer is a man with 25 years of experience in international trade negotiations. He was New Zealand’s ambassador in Britain (although born in Scotland, he was brought up a Kiwi), as well as his adopted country’s permanent representative to the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

His knowledge of the working of the Geneva-based organisation is crucial, considering its role trying to tear down trade barriers, lower tariffs and resolve commercial disputes between nations. Indeed, the fact is that if Britain leaves the EU without a deal, all our world trade relationships will be in the hands of the WTO.

Yet his verdict on a post-Brexit Britain could not be more upbeat.

‘The opportunities are enormous,’ he told the Sunday Times. ‘There are so many, where do I start? In ten years, maybe even quicker, people will look back and say: “Oh, why were we so negative about our future?” ’

Nor is his optimism dimmed by Mrs May’s Chequers deal. He believes that once outside the EU, whether after a soft or a hard Brexit, the Government will be much better placed than the doom-mongers behind Project Fear claim.

He says we’ll benefit from a ‘change of direction’ — not least because Brexit has forced businesses to focus on the potential of selling services and goods outside the EU.

Indeed, his enthusiasm is so infectious it makes you think that if he was in charge of Brexit, the whole thing would be wrapped up by now.

And far from being pie-in-the-sky, his reasoning is based on solid evidence.

The Washington-based International Monetary Fund forecasts that over the next ten to 15 years almost all significant global growth will originate outside Europe.

By 2020, China’s middle class — who are powerful engines of economic growth — will have expanded to 600 million people. India’s already numbers up to 300 million. It is estimated there will be 1.1 billion African middle classes by 2060.

Envied

Those populations, Falconer explains, will be desperate for British services and goods.

‘The world is the UK’s oyster,’ he says. ‘We produce the best professional services in the world. Our banks are the best in the world. Our insurance companies the most reliable. Our architects, our designers, our lawyers, our accountants: they are world-class.

‘We have intellectual property rights to die for. It is these services that the fastest-growing economies in Asia and Africa crave. The world is begging for the UK to be able to trade with it. We’ll be pushing on an open door.’

He sees huge export opportunities in goods from cars to aircraft wings and foodstuffs. ‘The world is crying out for protein and safe food generally. In East Asia, that’s what they want. They don’t trust their domestic production, with good reason. The UK makes world-class produce. We can now negotiate with countries in a way that’s specifically tailored to getting our salmon and our venison on tables.’

 

For those in despair over the lack of progress on Brexit, as our political class trade blows and the entire process becomes bogged down in a quagmire of their making, there is a small corner of a government department that they can turn to for cheer

He’s right. Even amid the present political stalemate, Britain’s exports of professional and financial services to the rest of the world (including the EU) climbed from £36.9 bn in the first quarter of 2017 to £37.8 bn in the same three months of this year.

As well as a being a powerhouse for financial services, Britain is home to Europe’s top four research universities and dominates in sectors such as popular music, computer gaming, video and publishing.

We’re world-beaters in pharmaceutical and aerospace research. Our technology know-how is envied across the globe, with Chinese, Japanese and American digital firms constantly on the prowl to buy our leading innovative firms.

In the past six months, Chinese firms have invested £1.7 bn in UK technology.

Every businessman or woman worth their salt is fully aware of the opportunities available by exploiting this huge competitive advantage.

And Dr Liam Fox and his Department of International Trade colleagues are determined to do so. Post-Brexit, they argue, Britain can take advantage of all this.

Of course, following two world wars, Britain has benefited hugely in economic terms by sharing trade interests with other members of the EU.

But the fact is that, despite Brussels bravado about the efficacy of a Single Market, EU member states have suffered over recent years because their Brussels rule-setters have been too inward-looking. They are obsessed by trade within the EU — to the detriment of the potential of wider possibilities across the whole world.

In contrast, the Department of International Trade looks outwards. In pursuit of the deals Britain must strike post-Brexit, Fox has travelled more than 300,000 miles. He may be mocked for trying to woo trade partners by giving them Union Jack cufflinks, but this ignores the hard work that his senior officials such as Crawford Falconer have been doing.

Bluster

 

Freed at last from the shackles of Brussels, what Dr Liam Fox and Crawford Falconer want is for Britain to seize the ‘enormous opportunities’ ahead. And for our political leaders to stop all their squabbling

Their outward-looking drive is vital at a time when Donald Trump has launched an international trade war by imposing tariffs on Chinese goods and taxes on imports such as steel and aluminium from EU countries. Indeed, the fear is that we are heading for trade wars on a scale not seen since the Thirties.

I am not so pessimistic. Too few people realise that behind all his bluster, Trump’s goal is not to sabotage the world’s trading system but to spark a new round of negotiations which will lead to tariffs being reduced in the long run.

Indeed, his policy is already having success. China and India have lowered tariff barriers in response to his threats.

Meanwhile, German car manufacturers have made it clear they want to negotiate tariff-free trade between the U.S. and Europe for motor vehicles.

The shape of global trade is changing before our eyes — and it is trade outside Europe that we must encourage.

Anyone who listens to those who want the UK to stay in the EU would think that Brexit was a crazy act of self-harm.

The truth is otherwise. Ever since the Brexit vote, our economy has prospered. Unemployment is at its lowest level since the Seventies.

Freed at last from the shackles of Brussels, what Dr Liam Fox and Crawford Falconer want is for Britain to seize the ‘enormous opportunities’ ahead. And for our political leaders to stop all their squabbling.

*

Patriotic, optimistic and a world expert on trade deals: Why Theresa May must listen to top aide Crawford Falcone on Brexit (and not the rest of the defeatist civil service)

THE HONOURABLE COURSE AT THIS CRUCIAL HOUR IN THE LIFE OF OUR NATION WOULD BE FOR THERESA MAY TO RESIGN  TO ALLOW A BREXITEER TO FINISH THE JOB- WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY .]

No legacy is so rich as honesty.-

Shakespeare

*

Honesty is the best policy.-

Franklin

*

Do not consider anything for your interest which makes you break your word, quit your modesty, or inclines you to any practice which will not bear the light, or look the world in the face.-

Marcus Antoninus.

*

 

ENGLAND DESERVES BETTER.

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

H.F.1640

*  *  *

 

 

UK invites Trump to visit EVERY year of his presidency despite his own London embassy commissioning a poll saying Britons do NOT want him for a State visit

 

  • Donald Trump is expected to stay 'at least overnight' in London on July 13 
  • State visit will see him spend time with Queen and Theresa May at Number 10
  • Documentary reveals US embassy commissioned poll on Trump coming to UK
  • People said they didn't want a State trip but wouldn't mind President visiting 
  • But there are already plans for him to visit in 2020 for 75th VE Day anniversary 

 

e-mail

 

The UK has invited Donald Trump to visit Britain every year of his presidency - despite the US embassy commissioning a poll that revealed the public don't want a State visit.  

Details of Mr Trump's UK visit are yet to be finalised, but he is expected to stay 'at least overnight' in London on July 13, the Daily Mail understands. 

It can now also be revealed British officials want him to visit every year he is in office, with his next visit planned for the 75th anniversary of VE Day in May 2020.  

This goes against the results of a survey carried out by the US embassy in London, which showed Brits don't want Mr Trump to meet the Queen or take part in an official State visit. 

 

A Channel 4 documentary about the new US embassy in London and ambassador Robert 'Woody' Johnson (pictured) reveals his office commissioned a poll to find out how the British felt about a US State visit to the UK 

 

It also reveals senior officials want to invite Trump to the UK every year of his presidency. Pictured: Inside the new embassy at Nine Elms, Vauxhall 

 

The first episode, to be aired on Monday, sees National Security Adviser Sir Mark Sedwill raising the idea of annual trips with US Ambassador Robert 'Woody' Johnson. 

 

Details of Mr Trump's UK visit are yet to be finalised, but the President (pictured) is expected to stay 'at least overnight' in London on July 13

Sir Mark says: 'Let's plan for a series of visits in his first term.' He suggests the anniversary of VE Day (Victory in Europe Day) in 2020, marking 75 years since the end of the second world war in Europe, as well as next year after Britain officially leaves the EU on 29 March.

He continues: 'I think for him to be the first big visit after Brexit - this is what I said to HR - to

 

The threat of protests is also believed to be behind the postponement of a state visit first mooted for 2017.

That trip - which would involve lavish ceremonies and a stay with the Queen at Buckingham Palace - has been repeatedly put back, though Number 10 insists the invitation stands.

The Daily Mail now understands Mr Trump will defy demonstrators and spend time in London next month. 

Senior US officials expect the President to be accompanied by the First Lady, Melania Trump, with plans for the couple to meet the Queen and Prince Philip.

He will arrive on British soil after spending time at a NATO summit in Brussels on July 11 and 12.  

Previously it was thought the President may make a flying visit of just a few hours. 

 

Inside the new US embassy: Thje Canyonlands Garden is pictured, which represents the Grand Canyon and the south west desert landscapes of the US

After promises of 2019 and 2020 visits were revealed, last night Lew Lukens, the US Embassy's deputy chief of mission, said they were open to further visits.

Asked about the idea of Mr Trump coming for VE Day commemorations, he said: 'It would certainly be an appropriate occasion for him to come over and mark.

'We are focused right now on the first visit, which will be in about a month.

'Beyond that we do think the State Visit will happen next year at same point, but beyond that we haven't set a date.' 

Mr Lukens said that details of the first visit have not yet been finalised as White House planners had been predominantly focused up until now on the meeting between Mr Trump and Kim Jong Un in Singapore.

He said: 'Normally one month before a visit we would have a pretty good idea at this point of the schedule but we don't in this case.

'The team from Washington, from the White House, that travels in advance of a visit to set up the programme was completely wrapped up with the Singapore summit, so they haven't been here yet.' 

 

Among one of the features at the US Embassy is this circular bar (pictured) with stunning views overlooking the London skyline

 

say, you know, this is a Brexit president.' It is thought he was referring to his former US counterpart HR McMaster.

The exchange suggests Ambassador Johnson and his team want Mr Trump to have a strong presence in the UK, despite the results of their own poll commissioned last year. 

Mr Trump cancelled his visit to open the new embassy building at Nine Elms earlier this year, claiming his predecessor Barack Obama had done a 'bad deal' by agreeing to move it from Grosvenor Square.

In a controversial tweet he branded Vauxhall an 'off location', saying that was the reason he cancelled.

But with protesters determined to thwart his visit with a series of demonstrations they branded 'a carnival of resistance' rumours swirled he had been put off.      

 

A Channel 4 documentary about the inner workings of the new £1.2billion London embassy (pictured exterior right) show press aides asking polling firm Survation to find out how the UK feels about a visit from President Trump

 

The first episode of 'Inside the American Embassy' focuses on the new US ambassador Woody Johnson.

An old friend of the President's and a business mogul himself, the documentary shows him saying he is 'very confident about what happens after Brexit' and that he 'doesn't think it's a major challenge.' 

An exchange at the US London embassy, which he opened without President Trump shows him shrugging off comments about the President on social media.

 

He tells Transport Secretary Chris Grayling: 'You have to interpret him on what he does, not what he says. And he knows what he's doing.'

Grayling replies: 'I think people underestimate people at their peril.' 

National Security Adviser Sir Mark Sedwill jokes about Mr Trump's 'off location' comment, saying 'We're going to forget about.'

Inside the American Embassy: Trump's Man in Britain will air on Channel 4 at 10pm on Monday, June 25.  

 
 

Brexit will be a huge success - I have no idea why Brits are so defeatist about it, says Trump's man in London

By John Stevens, Deputy Political Editor for The Daily Mail 

Donald Trump's ambassador to Britain has urged the country to be upbeat about Brexit, declaring it will be a great success.

Robert 'Woody' Johnson said he had been 'startled' by the 'defeatist attitude' towards leaving the EU that he has encountered since arriving in London last summer.

Setting out his positive vision for how the country will thrive without Brussels, the billionaire businessman said he wanted to tell the British people: 'Don't be pessimistic and have faith.'

He continued: 'How can a country with this great a history, this great a language, this great a legal system and this great a presence not be successful?'

The 71-year-old, who is a close friend of the President, also said he was 'super confident' about the special relationship between Britain and the US.

 

Last December, the President secured approval from the US Senate for a £1trillon tax cut for corporations, small businesses and individuals, which included reducing the rate on business profits from 35 per cent to 21 per cent.

Mr Johnson said: 'When you look at Donald Trump and what he has done, maybe take some inspiration and do some of the things he has done. 

'I mean he turned something round in one year, he has got 3 per cent growth.'

The documentary shows Mr Johnson meeting Foreign Office minister Sir Alan Duncan.

The ambassador told him: 'I had a very interesting group for breakfast yesterday, basically the whole financial community. They say the world does not really care about Brexit.

'The only people who care about Brexit are really mostly here, a little a bit in the EU. The Chinese really don't care about it, the American population does not know what it is.

'If you take a look from that perspective, I think it puts, maybe, our discussions now in some kind of new perspective or different perspective.

'We have to work together, we are going to do this, it is going to work out, we don't know exactly how but it is going to work.'

 

'The thing I want to get out more than anything else is an attitude that I feel I don't see enough in this country and that is a confidence for where you are heading – light at the end of the tunnel with Brexit,' he said. 

'The British have always been experts and great business people, great business minds, so to see this defeatist attitude towards Brexit is a bit startling to me.

'I read nothing about anybody having a positive attitude towards Brexit or towards the future. As an American I'm just not used to that.'

Mr Johnson, who was speaking in a Channel 4 programme documenting his first nine months in London, questioned why people are 'so nervous' about Brexit.

He said: 'I'm super confident about the relationship between the US and the UK. I'm very confident about our future together, I'm very confident about what happens after Brexit.

'I don't think that is a major challenge, why are we so nervous? We don't have the confidence in ourselves? We got the best people right here to do it. That is my take on my first months here.'

The Johnson & Johnson heir and owner of the New York Jets American football team, who is worth an estimated £3.2billion, suggested that Britain could replicate Mr Trump's tax cuts.

 

Last December, the President secured approval from the US Senate for a £1trillon tax cut for corporations, small businesses and individuals, which included reducing the rate on business profits from 35 per cent to 21 per cent.

Mr Johnson said: 'When you look at Donald Trump and what he has done, maybe take some inspiration and do some of the things he has done. 

'I mean he turned something round in one year, he has got 3 per cent growth.'

The documentary shows Mr Johnson meeting Foreign Office minister Sir Alan Duncan.

The ambassador told him: 'I had a very interesting group for breakfast yesterday, basically the whole financial community. They say the world does not really care about Brexit.

'The only people who care about Brexit are really mostly here, a little a bit in the EU. The Chinese really don't care about it, the American population does not know what it is.

'If you take a look from that perspective, I think it puts, maybe, our discussions now in some kind of new perspective or different perspective.

'We have to work together, we are going to do this, it is going to work out, we don't know exactly how but it is going to work.'

 

Inside the American Embassy: Trump's Man in Britain (ambassador Robert 'Woody' Johnson pictured centre with his aides) will air on Channel 4 at 10pm on Monday, June 25

 

Earlier this month, Boris Johnson suggested at a private dinner that Mr Trump would handle the Brexit negotiations better than the Prime Minister.

In a leaked recording of the gathering of Tory supporters, the Foreign Secretary said he was 'increasingly admiring' of the President and was 'more and more convinced that there is method in his madness'.

The US ambassador's intervention came as two senior ministers spoke of the need to be more upbeat about Brexit.

Housing minister Dominic Raab told the House magazine: 'I think we should go into these negotiations with a bit of economic self-confidence.

'The economy has held up and proved far more resilient than some of the naysayers suggested. We should go into it with political ambition.'

And, in a speech yesterday, International Development Secretary Penny Mordaunt said it was time to 'cheer up'. She said: 'As we leave the EU we need to get our mojo back.' 

Inside the American Embassy: Trump's Man in Britain will air on Channel 4 at 10pm on Monday. 

e-mail

 

1.1k

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

H.F.1583

*  *  *

A PROMISE! IS A PROMISE!

THERESA MAY MUST MAKE A MOVE FROM PRIME MINISTER WITHOUT DELAY FOR WASTING OVER 24 MONTH'S PROVING HERSELF A STOLID REMAINER.

HER CONFIDENTIAL AND CLANDESTINE CONTACTS WITH FRAU MERKEL WE CONSIDER AS TREASONABLE CONDUCT WHICH SHOWED HER TRUE COLOURS AND NOT TO BE TRUSTED TO DELIVER HER SOLEMN PROMISE TO THE PEOPLE

BREXIT MEANS BREXIT

HER REPLACEMENT SHOULD BE SELECTED WITHOUT DELAY FROM TRUE BREXITEERS

WHO WILL BE TRUSTED TO IMPLEMENT THE WISHES OF

17.5 MILLION PATRIOTS

WHO WANT THEIR

 COUNTRY AND CULTURE AND CONSTITUTION

BACK IN MONTHS - NOT YEARS.

JULY 17,2018

     

    EARLY SUMMER BREAK

     

     

     

    SCRAPPED

     

     

     

    MPs set to be sent home for the summer

     

     

    EARLY as May ... - Daily Mail

    Controversial plans to give MPs an early SUMMER HOLIDAY were axed in a humiliating climbdown last night-24 hours after they were announced.

    JULY 18,2018

 

ON THURSDAY, JULY 19,2018 'Boris warns Theresa's EU plan 'has left us in a fog of self-doubt' ( -indecision-uncertainty -) Well! we and millions of BREXITEERS have been aware of this for most of the past 18 months ,and they were expecting a change of leadership at this present  and crucial time , to a committed  Brexit agenda to

GET THE JOB DONE!

WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY.

From what we see is that the above so-called drama was a smokescreen to protect Theresa May and obtain some unity in the so-called Conservative Party, while the dithering continues,  with a possible leadership change in the New Year. Without the promised CHANGE! the BREXIT party faithful will leave in droves over the coming months and years.

UKIP or whatever their new name will be, needs to appoint a dynamic patriotic LEADER to attract those millions of PATRIOTS who are looking for a political party to PROTECT their FREEDOM-CULTURE-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY which ALL the

GANG of THREE

in

 PARLIAMENT

 had

FAILED TO DO!

*  *  *

 

BETRAYAL!

We have been betrayed by every so-called  Conservative Party since 1972. The very essence and meaning of its very name has been ignored which should be to CONSERVE our CULTURE-CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.  But they are adept at being 'CUNNING' as we have seen over the past 46 years but particularly  at the PRESENT TIME!

We have called for the emergence of a new

PATRIOTIC-POLITICAL PARTY of the CENTRE

to which the millions being denied their just

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

of Englishmen

may find a home for their political beliefs?

*

A REFERENDUM SHOULD INCLUDE A LEGAL DATE FOR COMPLETION RATHER THAN LEFT OPEN-HANDED AS IT IS WITH BREXIT WHICH HAS ALREADY TAKEN TWO YEARS.

'JUSTICE DELAYED

IS

JUSTICE DENIED.'

 

GLADSTONE.

 

JULY 18,2018

H.F.1623

*  *  *

PETER OBORNE

 

 

 

 

PETER OBORNE: Theresa May is a survivor but I fear she is increasingly trapped and badly bruised

208

View
comments

 

 This week’s parliamentary chaos over Brexit was graphic evidence that we are living through some of the most dangerous and unpredictable political times of the past few decades.

Yes, Theresa May seems certain to survive through to Parliament’s summer recess on Tuesday, when MPs break up for their six-week summer holiday, but she is badly bruised.

The fact is, she will need more than her characteristic stubbornness and sang froid in the future, as events have started to move out of her control in a truly menacing direction.

 

Theresa May seems certain to survive through to Parliament’s summer recess on Tuesday

Of course, central to her difficulties is her failure to have a Commons majority. That weakness is being exploited by Labour, by Tory MPs on both sides of the hard/soft Brexit argument and by EU negotiators in Brussels.

It is an axiom of politics that prime ministers can stay in power only if they can control a majority in Parliament. Without one, Mrs May has been forced to watch as Parliament, rather than her Government, starts to seize control of the Brexit process.

She can no longer impose her will.

True, Mrs May secured victory in all but one of the knife-edge Commons votes last week, but she has paid a massive price in lost personal authority.

A civil war raging in the Tory party is ugly to behold. Indeed, what we have witnessed over the past week has been not only undignified but an insult to the British people.

Outrageously, Tory MPs have turned on each other. Remainer MP Heidi Allen has questioned the ‘integrity and honesty’ of colleagues over the way MPs were corralled into voting for Mrs May’s Brexit deal. Fellow Remainer Anna Soubry questioned the activities of the party’s whips and suggested there should be resignations if the Conservatives ‘cannot behave with honour’.

For her part, Brexiteer Tory Nadine Dorries turned on Soubry, saying she had ‘lost the plot’. Meanwhile, Tory MPs Ed Vaizey and Andrew Bridgen clashed during a BBC interview as they disagreed about the Chequers agreement.

Not to be outdone, Remainer Simon Hart used an obscenity on Twitter, telling fellow Tory MP Chris Green, who is a Brexiteer, that ‘nobody gives a f***’ that he had resigned as a parliamentary private secretary in a huff because he felt the Brexit that voters wanted had been abandoned by the Government.

I have reported on Parliament for more than a quarter of a century but I have never seen anything remotely as venomous as this —- not even the Tory party blood feud over Europe in the early 1990s. Sadly, I don’t believe that Theresa May has the authority to pull her party behind her. In fact, MPs are starting to order her around.

 

For her part, Brexiteer Tory Nadine Dorries (pictured)  turned on Soubry, saying she had ‘lost the plot’.

Even her attempts at bridge-building have failed. Last week, the Prime Minister invited leaders of Conservative associations to No 10. It was an attempt to mend fences and bring unity.

Instead, these representatives of the Tory grassroots used the opportunity to vent more anger. Mrs May, to quote the contemptuous words aimed by Norman Lamont at his boss John Major when he resigned as Chancellor in 1993, ‘gives the impression of being in office but not in power’.

In her lonely fight for survival and to deliver Brexit, Mrs May is relying on one last, desperate strategy.

She hopes her Chequers blueprint can prevail by creating a split in the ranks of those Tory MPs who have fought for a Brexit.

She has already succeeded in dividing the two men who were like blood brothers on the Leave side during the EU referendum campaign: Boris Johnson and Michael Gove.

Gove is fully signed up to her strategy, albeit because he is convinced that Britain will be able to strike a tougher deal with Brussels in the future.

For his part, Johnson couldn’t stomach Mrs May’s compromise deal and resigned from the Cabinet. The cluster of admiring Conservative MPs around him as he made his resignation speech on Wednesday showed that a faction is building up behind Johnson as a leader-in-waiting.

The PM, who is under such intense strain that I’m told she appeared close to tears at one point last week, has another tactic.

She hopes that she will be backed by Labour MPs who support her Brexit blueprint and are fed up with Jeremy Corbyn.

This embryonic and ramshackle coalition was enough to save Mrs May last week — but the big question is, will it last when Parliament reconvenes in September?

For if Brussels accepts her Brexit deal — which is certainly not a foregone conclusion — she must bring it before Westminster to be approved.

Theresa May is a brave woman and I wish her well. But the chances are that it will be voted down in Parliament and she will lose the ensuing vote of confidence. What then?

Tory Brexiteers such as Jacob Rees-Mogg want Britain to crash out of the EU without a deal. But I am convinced that Parliament will prevent that happening.

Whatever the case, we are witnessing a political crisis of a scale not seen since wartime.

As power continues to drain from Mrs May, we face the prospect of a third general election in four years and even a second EU referendum.

I still believe there is a fair chance Theresa May can agree a deal with Brussels and then force it through Parliament. But the odds of that happening have shortened dramatically in the past fortnight.

Britain has entered uncharted and very treacherous waters.

 
 

 Three months ago, Britain joined America in a bombing campaign against Syria following claims that President Assad had used the nerve agent sarin in an attack on the Damascus suburb of Douma, a base of anti-government rebels.

This week, however, the UN chemical weapons investigatory body reported there was no evidence that chemical weapons were used. Instead, its inspectors found chlorinated substances. Such chemicals are commonly used in household and industrial products.

In April, Jeremy Corbyn told the Government that it should intervene only if there was definitive proof of the use of chemical weapons.

His misgivings have now been proved justified and the Foreign Office must explain why it approved what seems to have been an illegal assault on Syria.

 
 

 Imran bats for Britain

For most Britons, Imran Khan is one of the most glamorous sportsmen of the modern age.

Today, 26 years since he led Pakistan to a cricket World Cup final victory against England, he stands on the verge of an astonishing political triumph.

Imran Khan is expected to be elected Pakistan’s prime minister next week.

I believe he has the charisma and calibre to lead his country to great things. But his election would also be excellent news for Britain.

Mr Khan is an unashamed Anglophile, having studied at Oxford University, where he was a contemporary of cricket-lover Theresa May.

Good relations between our two countries are vital, considering that more than a million British people are of Pakistani heritage.

 
 

 

After David Davis resigned as Brexit Secretary, his special adviser, Stewart Jackson MP, said he wished to stay on and work for his successor.

However, Downing Street officials refused to let him. In a fit of pique, Stewart then launched a blistering attack on the Government’s EU withdrawal strategy, accusing No 10 of wanting a ‘Hotel California Brexit’ where Britain checks out but never leaves (a reference to the lyrics of the Eagles’ most famous hit).

Stewart’s sudden U-turn suggests hypocrisy, a failure to control his temper and bad manners.

 

Peter Oborne-Mrs May a survivor but I fear she's increasingly trapped

*  *  *

 

[THE HEADING WE WOULD HAVE APPROPRIATELY USED:

 

Mrs May's a survivor but I fear she's increasingly trapped in her own web of deceit.'

Other similar terms coming to mind are subterfuge-subtrude and subvert .

17.5 MILLION  VOTERS WANTED BACK

 THEIR CULTURE

-THEIR CONSTITUTION

 AND

THEIR COUNTRY

 FROM HITLER'S PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION]

 

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1627

*  *  *

 

The unsung plane that REALLY won the Battle of Britain: The Hawker Hurricane gets its rightful place in history
 

 

VIew
comment

 

The scene is still one of the most evocative in this island's history: dashing young pilots in their fighter planes, defying the odds as they speed across blue summer skies towards the intruder above southern England.

A German aircraft goes into an uncontrollable spin, smoke pouring from its bullet-riddled engine as it plunges to earth.
 

At an RAF station on the ground, the mellifluous voice of Vera Lynn wafts from a nearby wireless. From the House of Commons chamber, Winston Churchill's whisky-soaked growl rouses a nation to resistance at its moment of darkest peril.

 
 

Old reliable: This restored Hawker Hurricane shows the classic fighter plane in all its glory

Seventy years on, the Battle of Britain continues to have such resonance because the campaign so magnificently fused an epic quality with a moral purpose.

It represented the classic fight between good and evil; between freedom and tyranny.
 

It was the ancient myth of St George slaying the Dragon made real. The Arthurian legend translated into the modern world, with the Knights of the Round Table cast as the selfless-RAF pilots and the sword of Excalibur as the fighter force.

Yet, for all this heroic glory, a sad injustice hangs over the battle.

For the summer of 1940 will always be associated with the Supermarine Spitfire, the single-engined RAF plane which became the most potent symbol of Britain's fight against German subjugation. The very name Spitfire is now synonymous with victory in the air.

But this is a travesty of what really happened in the crucial months of 1940.
 

 
 

A dogfight for credit: The Supermarine Spitfire was faster in the skies, but much slower to produce in the factories, which meant there were less of them in the air

For the RAF aircraft which actually won the Battle of Britain was an older, larger, slower but still deadly fighter, the Hawker Hurricane.

Without the Hurricane, the RAF would have probably lost the Battle of Britain, because there were simply not enough Spitfires emerging from the aircraft factories and into the squadrons.

In the national struggle for survival, the Hurricane dominated the front line.
 

 

When Churchill made his famous tribute to the men of the RAF in August 1940, telling Parliament that 'never in the field of human conflict has so much been owed by so many to so few', it was the Hurricane units that deserved the lion's share of the Prime Minister's accolade.

On the eve of the Battle of Britain in early July 1940, Fighter Command's operational force throughout the United Kingdom was made up of 29 squadrons of Hurricanes and 19 of Spitfires, proportions that were to remain the same throughout the coming months.
 

The overall distribution between the two fighters was largely reflected in German losses. According to the Air Ministry's own figures, for every two Luftwaffe planes brought down by the Spitfires, three were shot down by Hurricanes.

 
 

Enemy destroyer: Even though the Hurricane shot down three German planes for every two by Spitfire, Germans considered it a slight on their honour to be downed by a Hurricane

 
 

'It was the aircraft for the right season. It came at a time when it literally saved the country and it performed magnificently,' said Eric 'Winkle' Brown, the renowned test pilot.

Despite tributes such as this, the Hurricane never received the credit it deserved.
 

A graphic indicator of this indifference could be seen in the mass flypast over London in September 1945, held to celebrate the fifth anniversary of the Battle of Britain.
 

Astonishingly, not a single Hurricane was included in the RAF's formation.

Even during the war, the plane's record was ignored, its achievements belittled.
 

After the defeat of the Luftwaffe, the air industry magazine Flight commented in September 1940 that in comparison to the Spitfire, the Hurricane was 'equally remarkable in its own particular way', but had received 'far less than its due attention from a somewhat fickle public'.

 
 

Together: A Spitfire, in the foreground, flies with a Hurricane

This was partly a result of wartime propaganda, as the Government exploited the image of the Spitfire to boost morale.
 

Tellingly, the official campaign of 1940 to raise money for aircraft production was called 'the Spitfire Fund'.

When a group of citizens in North London tried to set up a 'Hurricane Fund', they encountered only widespread indifference and even ignorance about the plane.
 

Further lustre was added to the Spitfire's reputation by newsreels, articles and films such as The First Of The Few, the 1942 biopic in which Leslie Howard played the part of the plane's designer, Reginald Mitchell.

Nor can it be denied that the Spitfire, with its intrinsic elegance, had greater aesthetic appeal than the more solid Hurricane, which had much thicker wings.
 

Moreover, the Spitfire was a faster plane, enjoying a superiority of 30mph in level flight and 70mph in a dive.

 
 

Made of different stuff: This wrecked Hurricane shell shows the mix of materials that made its design so different to the Spitfire

It exuded sleek modernity, while the heavier Hurricane evoked the past, not least in the structure of its airframe which owed its origins to the Hawker biplanes of the late 1920s.
 

Throughout its life, in contrast to the all-metal Spitfire, the Hurricane's fuselage was built partly of wood and fabric.

So strong was the bias against the Hurricane that a form of Spitfire snobbery arose during the Battle of Britain, where victories by the Hawker planes were falsely attributed to the more glamorous Spitfire fighters.

Hurricane pilot Tom Neil of 249 Squadron recalled going to a cinema in Leeds to see a newsreel report of an encounter in which one of his sections had shot down a Junkers Ju88 bomber over the Yorkshire coast.
 

'The British Movietone News commentator credited the Spitfire with shooting down the German aircraft, producing whoops of disbelief and annoyance,' he said.

The Spitfire snobbery even extended to German airmen, some of whom seemed to regard the idea of being shot down by a Hurricane as an insult to their honour.

 
 

Cultural icon: The Spitfire continues to inspire young people today but the Hurricane might have occupied an equal or even superior footing had its illustrious history not been airbrushed by the RAF

One Hurricane pilot, Eric Seabourne, ended up in a hospital in Portsmouth after he had been badly injured in a dogfight. In the bed next to him was a German pilot.

'He had been shot down by a Hurricane, which he thought much below his dignity. If it had been a Spitfire, it would have been OK - but not a Hurricane,' recalled Seabourne.

This complacent, dismissive judgment was one of the prime reasons that the Germans lost the Battle of Britain, for they badly underestimated the fighting qualities of the Hawker plane.

The Hurricane might not have been as fast or as beautiful as the Spitfire, but it had a host of other virtues.

It was highly manoeuvrable, with a turning circle even tighter than that of a Spitfire. Because of its traditional method of construction, it was easy for factories to produce in large quantities, a vital factor in early 1940 when the Spitfires were still in short supply.

Just as importantly, its airframe made it straightforward to repair. No fewer than 60 per cent of all Hurricanes that crashed on British soil ended up back in service with squadrons.

 
 

Legend: Fighter pilot Douglas Bader, who lost both his legs in a flying accident, thought the Hurricane had 'a marvellous gun platform'

With a wide undercarriage, lack of vices and intrinsic strength, the Hurricane was the ideal fighter for raw recruits, a priceless asset during the Battle of Britain when the demand from the operational squadrons for new pilots was so high.

The plane's structure also made the plane astonishingly resilient in combat. The Hawker could absorb phenomenal amounts of punishment, with enemy bullets often passing right through the fuselage.

Ben Bowring, of 111, believed that the Hurricane 'would keep flying almost after it was destroyed'. On one occasion he was able to land after his wings had been all but wrecked in combat.

'That aircraft's a bloody miracle,' he said after jumping out.

In addition, the Hurricane's thick wings, each of which contained four Browning machine guns, also provided a unique stability when attacking the enemy.

The famous legless pilot Douglas Bader, who flew Hurricanes in the Battle of Britain, regarded the fighter as 'a marvellous gun platform.
 

It was a victim of Spitfire snobbery from both sides
 

The sloping nose gave you a splendid view forward and the plane remained rock steady when you fired', whereas on the Spitfire, 'the recoil effect was noticeable'.
 

And Sir Hugh Dowding, who masterminded the 1940 victory as head of Fighter Command, had no doubt about the importance of the Hurricane: 'It was a jolly good machine, a rugged type, stronger than the Spitfire.'

Remarkably, given this fine record, the Hurricane was a plane that the British Government neither ordered nor even wanted when Hawker's chief designer, Sydney Camm, first came up with the proposal for a new high-speed monoplane in March 1934.

In an era of slow biplanes, Camm's design represented a major technical-advance, but the Air Ministry was not interested because it had already commissioned a prototype of the Spitfire.

'It is regretted that, at the present time, the Department is unable to give active encouragement to the scheme proposed,' wrote the Ministry to Camm, a statement showing classic bureaucratic lack of prescience.

But Camm, who combined a ferocious-sense of determination with a volcanic temper, was not a man to give up easily, largely as a result of his tough upbringing.

The eldest of 12 children born to a working- class carpenter from Windsor, he had developed his passion for aeronautics while still a schoolboy.

At the outbreak of World War I, when he was just 21, he went to work for one of Britain's pioneering-aircraft manufacturers, Martin and Handasyde - where he soon showed a precocious talent for design - before going on to join Hawker.

During an amazingly fruitful career, he designed 52 types of aircraft and presided over the manufacture of 26,000 planes - including the Harrier jump jet, the world's first successful vertical take-off and landing fighter.
 

But the Hurricane-remained his most significant achievement.

Undaunted by the Air Ministry's rejection in early 1934, Camm pressed on with his monoplane project as a private venture, modifying the design to make it even more effective.

His persistence paid off, helped by development problems that were plaguing the rival Spitfire.
 

Once the Hurricane had made a successful first flight on November 6, 1935 - five months ahead of the Spitfire's first trip - the Air Ministry relented and placed an order for 600.

The first operational Hurricanes went into service with 111 Squadron in December 1937, just as the drumbeat of war was echoing across Europe.

Compared with lightly armed biplane fighters that barely reached 200mph, the new 300mph Hurricanes were a revelation for their air crews.

On the eve of conflict, the Hurricane invigorated the RAF.
 

As the Battle of Britain ace Group Captain Peter Townsend, later the love of Princess Margaret, wrote: 'We were at one with ourselves and our machines.

'It was the Hurricane, really, which gave us such immense confidence, with its mighty engine, the powerful battery of eight guns and its feel of swift, robust strength.'
 

And such optimism proved to be well-founded. The Hurricane was the only RAF fighter to see action in every major theatre, from the start of the war to its finish.

It fought heroically in the doomed Battle of France, over Dunkirk, in the Balkans, in the North African Desert, and even in the war against the Japanese over the Burmese jungle, during which campaign it was occasionally used to drop the lethal petro-chemical gel napalm on the enemy.

More than 2,000 Hurricanes fought with the Soviet air force, while some specially adapted Hurricanes, known as Hurricats, were catapulted from merchant ships to defend the Atlantic convoys from aerial attack.

Altogether, 14,533 Hurricanes were built, the last in August 1944.

But, as with the nation, the Battle of Britain represented the Hurricane's finest hour. Without this fighter, the RAF's defences would have been too overstretched to survive.

Contrary to German mythmaking, the Hurricane proved a mortal foe to the Luftwaffe, on some estimates shooting down more than 1,000 German planes.

Bleeding to death, the Nazi forces continued to misjudge both the power and numbers of Fighter Command.

After September 15, 1940, the day which was subsequently designated Battle of Britain Day because it represented the final defeat of the Luftwaffe, one German airman, Hans Zonderlind, wrote of how his confidence turned to dismay while conducting a raid.

'We saw the Hurricanes coming towards us and it seemed the whole RAF was here,' he said.

After the war, the German general Gerd von Runstedt confessed that the Battle of Britain had been the turning point in the conflict.
 

He said: 'That was the first time we realised we could be beaten and we were beaten and we didn't like it.'

*

Too readily sidelined or forgotten, the Hurricane is owed a huge debt for saving Britain, and indeed the world, in the triumphant months of 1940.

 

VIew
comment

 

• Hurricane: Victor Of The Battle Of Britain by Leo McKinstry is published by John Murray at £20. To order a copy for £17.99 (p&p free), call 0845 155 0720


 
 

 

H.F.1629

*  *  *

News for DAILY MAIL-THE DONALD'S RIGHT TO GIVE BOTH BARRELS TO GERMANY

 

460

View
comments

 

What kind of people have we become that we greet a visiting American president with noisy protests and a 20ft balloon of him dressed in a nappy?

Donald Trump may be an obnoxious, morally flawed human being. He is certainly a maverick. But he is also the leader of the free world and of our closest ally, whose goodwill we will need more than ever in a post-Brexit world.

The Germans or the French or the Italians would not indulge in such puerile antics. So why do we? Why must we put our largely fabricated moral outrage in front of this country’s national self-interest?

All I can say is that I hope the notoriously over-touchy President does not fall into the error of believing the protests and the fatuous balloon are somehow representative of what most Britons feel about his visit to our country.

 
 

What kind of people have we become that we greet a visiting American president with noisy protests and a 20ft balloon of him dressed in a nappy?

 

In his tactless and outspoken way, Trump hit the bullseye in taking Germany, and its self-satisfied leader, Angela Merkel, to task before a Nato summit in Brussels. Trump was absolutely right to chide Germany for making itself so reliant on Moscow for its supplies of gas, and enriching a corrupt and murderous regime in the process

The great majority of people, I strongly suspect, will think it impolite as well as foolhardy to treat the democratically elected leader of the United States with such discourtesy. Doubly so, given that visits by far greater monsters than Trump have passed virtually unnoticed.

How many of these voluble, Leftist, anti-Trump demonstrators objected to the visit in 2015 of China’s President Xi Jinping, neither democratically elected nor especially well-disposed towards this country? Very few, if any.

I also wonder whether it ever occurs to these zealots that Donald Trump may actually be right about some things, and occasionally deserves our support — even congratulations — rather than automatic and unconsidered censure?

For example, he seems to be making progress in persuading North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons, though admittedly he is far from an agreement. Still, he has achieved more in a few months dealing with this potentially lethal regime than his predecessor, Barack Obama, did in eight years.

And yesterday, in his tactless and outspoken way, he hit the bullseye in taking Germany, and its self-satisfied leader, Angela Merkel, to task before a Nato summit in Brussels.

Trump was absolutely right to chide Germany for making itself so reliant on Moscow for its supplies of gas, and enriching a corrupt and murderous regime in the process.

His suggestion that it imports between 60 and 70 per cent of its energy requirements from Russia is bang on. Such a high degree of dependence on a potential adversary is reckless. Germany dare not stand up to an increasingly belligerent Russia because Vladimir Putin could at any stage threaten to turn off the gas taps.

Moreover, as Trump pointed out, Berlin is pouring billions of euros into Putin’s not particularly full coffers, helping to rescue an economy that would otherwise be even more on the skids than it is. He also complained that German politicians had been working for Russian energy companies after leaving politics.

Needless to say, the American President’s characteristically over-the-top expressions — he said Germany was a ‘captive’ of Russia, and ‘totally controlled’ by it — unnerved normally consensual European diplomats.

Jens Stoltenberg, the Nato Secretary General and an easy-going Norwegian, was reportedly shocked by Trump’s tirade. Nothing like it had ever been heard before in an organisation which likes to hides its differences behind closed doors.

Trump fired a second, and no less well-aimed, barrel at Angela Merkel over Germany’s low contribution to Nato. Here again he was on solid ground, and Merkel’s subsequent irate riposte that her country ‘does a lot for Nato’ was pretty disingenuous.

For the truth is that Europe’s largest economy relies on America, and to a much lesser extent on Britain, for its defence. While the U.S. spends 3.5 per cent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defence, Germany devotes a paltry 1.24 per cent.

 

Trump's suggestion that Germany imports between 60 and 70 per cent of its energy requirements from Russia is bang on. Such a high degree of dependence on a potential adversary is reckless. Germany dare not stand up to an increasingly belligerent Russia because Vladimir Putin could at any stage threaten to turn off the gas taps

It has undertaken to reach the Nato target of 2 per cent (which Britain already just meets) by 2030. But as Trump pointed out yesterday: ‘They could do it tomorrow.’

Why don’t they? Because German politicians — like French, Italian and, to a smaller degree, British ones — have over many decades got into the lazy habit of thinking it is America’s responsibility, not theirs, to pay for the defence of Europe.

What made sense after the end of World War II, when Western Europe was impoverished and unable to defend itself against Soviet aggression, no longer makes sense more than 70 years later, when the EU is the world’s largest trade bloc.

Believe it or not, America’s total defence expenditure of £515 billion in 2017 was more than two-and-a-half times that of all the other 28 Nato countries combined. It’s true that much of America’s war chest is not directly spent on defending Western Europe. Nonetheless, the imbalance is grotesque.

Britain can’t evade some culpability, and will have to spend more on defence if it wishes to be taken seriously by the U.S. after Brexit. But Germany is most at fault because it is the richest European nation and yet spends less on defence as a proportion of GDP than almost any other.

What a strange and contradictory country Germany is! On the one hand it unguardedly makes itself reliant on Russia, a potential adversary, for its energy supplies, having unwisely turned its back on nuclear power.

At the same time it expects Uncle Sam to go on bankrolling its defence, leaving Berlin significant resources to be spent on welfare or health and — so Donald Trump believes — on boosting Germany’s export drive.

Yet the same country that is unprepared to pay for its own defence, and so militarily cuts a very unassuming figure in the world, turns into a ruthless bully in the realms of the EU.

Greece has been reduced to penury by being forced to ingest a noxious economic medicine brewed in Berlin, while Italy struggles to keep afloat because the euro’s exchange rate, which suits the export-driven German economy, is strangling its own.

In human terms, Germany resembles an overfed and selfish baby, expecting to be sustained by free rusks and endless supplies of milk while refusing to face up to its grown-up responsibilities in the world.

And that brings me to Brexit, where it is widely thought that, like some overmighty pasha, Angela Merkel has to only click her fingers if she decides the time has come to bring Michel Barnier’s torturing of British negotiators to an end.

Last week, before unveiling her flawed plan to the Cabinet at Chequers, Theresa May scuttled off to the court of the German Chancellor to set out her pots and pans for inspection. She appears to have received an encouraging grunt — or so, at any rate, our craven civil servants and grovelling politicians believe.

Many Britons recalling the history of the 20th century will find it intolerable that a British prime minister should be expected to bow and scrape in front of a German Chancellor.

For the preservation of my sanity, I prefer not to dwell on such thoughts but to focus on the seeming inevitability of Donald Trump setting in motion a partial withdrawal of American support for the defence of Europe.

If this happens, Germany will require new military partners. And where will she find them? In Paris, certainly. But in London, too. Europe will not be safe without Britain. And that is why we should not be crawling obsequiously towards those who need us.

 

460

View
comments

 

News for DAILY MAIL-THE DONALD'S RIGHT TO GIVE BOTH BARRELS TO GERMANY

 

H.F.1608

*  *  *

BROUGHT BACK FROM 2006

[IN 2018 OUR COUNTRY APPEARS TO BE BACK IN THE DARK AGES WITH LAW AND ORDER IN CHAOS-MUCH MORE VIOLENT CRIME-FEW IF ANY BOBBIES -ON-THE-BEAT (EXCEPT IN DURHAM-LUCKY POPULATION)-MORE PRISONS REQUIRED AND TOUGHER SENTENCES. 12 BILLION IN OVERSEAS AID MUCH OF IT WASTED ON DANCERS AND DICTATORS... THE GOVERNMENT IS EVASIVE AND AS WITH BREXIT THEY IGNORE THE POPULATION WITH DECEIT AND MENDACITY. WHERE HAVE CONSERVATIVE VALUES GONE?]

*  *  *

JOHN REID HIT BY FIRST RISE IN CRIME FOR 11 YEARS

-WITH VIRTUALLY NO BOBBIES-ON-THE-BEAT- NO SURPRISE!

*

REID hit by first rise in CRIME for 11- YEARS.

BY

Matthew Hickley

Daily Mail-Home Affairs Correspondent-Dec., 9, 2006

JOHN REID suffered a fresh blow yesterday after it emerged that levels of crime have risen since he took over as Home Secretary this year.

According to the British Crime Survey, the number of offences went up between March and June, the first such increase since 1995.

Ministers have always insisted the BCS is the most accurate measure of CRIME.

The news came out in a Home Office performance report that also showed targets to cut reoffending and hard-drug abuse were missed.

The reversal of an 11-year fall in CRIME on his WATCH will embarrass Mr Reid, who has portrayed himself as a tough Home Secretary.

He still holds ambitions of taking on Gordon brown to become party leader and Premier.

[Well to have any chance at all he needs to use the £30,000,000 which was earmarked for prison building and still not spent and put Bobbies -on-the -Beat back on their plod in every community in the once almost law-abiding and safe and pleasant land]

 

Mugging, low-level violence and drug possession are up [NO SURPRISE!] after MINISTERS eased the LAW on DRINKING and CANNABIS and axed a ROBBERY crackdown.

The Home Office Report describes the rise in CRIME as a 'slippage' [Not a 'Gap' in this instance] in the flagship target to cut offending by 15 per cent from 2002 to 2007.

[Criminals across the world are converging on our Capital City and throughout our land as they realize what a lot of looney politically correct  police chiefs- politicians and their ardent helpers have made our country the ideal place to make loads of money and if -which is most likely they may have a chance of a jackpot of £50,000 because life was so marvelous in the nick that they decide to stay put rather than accept their black plastic bag at the door to freedom.  With what we hear the facilities in many prison would put many hotels to shame]

In the twelve months to March this year, the BCS showed

10,912,000

- offences were committed against adults in England and Wales [And these figures do NOT include the great number of crimes which are not recorded because the public has given up trying to get any response from their overburdened  paper-chase police who are confined to their safe blockhouses.  ]

While the increase is small, the Government can no longer claim that crime is falling. In recent years the BCS -based on household surveys in England and Wales -showed crime falling even while police logged more offences. [Well it is easy to see why-because so many people have come to accept the futility of giving information about crime levels when they see that the statistics later show that the state of the war on the streets that they see is totally different to the message they are palmed off with that things aren't half so bad -Want a bet many would say?]

Ministers said the BCS results were the best measure of trends, claiming police figures were distorted by new counting rules [OH! Yeah!]  But with the BCS showing a two per cent year-on-year rise in over-all crime, the Home Office stressed police recorded crime fell by a similar amount and called the BCS rise by a similar amount and called the BCS rise .not statistically significant' [Well those suffering from crime would have something to say about that.]

 

The Home Office report lists targets that have been hit, such as reduced fear of crime among the public and more offenders brought to justice [What JUSTICE! from what most people see it is a TRAVESTY of JUSTICE they see when they see so many criminals escaping from REAL PUNISHMENT whether MURDERERS or THIEVES. The increase in CRIME is because the criminal can see what a soft option it is if they are -most unlikely to be nicked in the act -with the traditional Bobbie -on-the -Beat nowhere to be seen]

It also boasts that the number  of 'unfounded asylum claims' in Britain has dropped from a peak of 70,000 in 2002 to around 40,000 this year.

BUT the number being removed fell by 30 per cent and the backlog of deportations is growing. [We understand from reports that it will take 27 years in order to clear the backlog and the time scale is growing each month New Labour stays in power]

The Home Office is missing its target of cutting reoffending among young criminals by five per cent over five years, with more than 41 per cent still being caught again within one year.

There has been no significant fall in targets to cut Class-A drug use among young people in eight years [Now isn't that a coincidence considering that New Labour has been the main culprit in giving the wrong message on DRUGS and so much more with their looney schemes of understanding such as are held by the Inspector of Prisons who believes there are too many young people in prison. The problem we have today is that the young have figured out the so-called system to suit themselves. The Home Office possibly doesn't know it but it is the CRIMINALS who are in CHARGE not the HOME OFFICE.]

The proportion of under -25s using HARD DRUGS still at 8.4 per cent.

 

Class-A drug abuse among vulnerable youths rose from 14.1 per cent in 2003 to 14.3 per cent.

 

ROBBERIES rose by five per cent in the year on June,  after police abandoned a street crime initiative when Home Office funding ended. [The £5 billion cost of the illegal Iraq War -no doubt.]

A 16 per cent rise in drug offences reflected an increase in cannabis possession after the law was relaxed [They were told it would happen -just as they have been told of the dangers of excess of GAMBLING-DRINKING-DRUG USE but there is no EXCESS PUNISHMENT for MURDERERS or VIOLENT CRIME and the street monsters who now rule the streets throughout the country because there is NO -Bobbie-on-the-Beat -released from paperwork and PC garbage and the return of powers to put the troublemaker in stir and the fast building programme to house the thousands of Hardened offenders out of the 200,000 on parole who should Be- Out-Of -Sight and Out-Of -Mind -DON'T YOU AGREE?]

Low-level violence was up 14 per cent year on year, which critics link to 24-hour drinking.

 

Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said:

'Despite the tough talk from this Home Secretary, the Government has failed to meet targets for reducing CRIME, DRUG USE by YOUNG PEOPLE and RE-OFFENDING. This amounts to a SERIOUS FAILURE.

[In every cloud there is a silver lining or in the words of a  Elizabethan poet ...'O'er lawyers' fingers, who straight dream in fees...' To our second greatest poet we have the following lines which fit a man now in imperseverant mood who's departure is near at hand...

"Horror and doubt distract

His troubled thoughts, and from the bottom stir

The Hell within him; for within him Hell

He brings, and round about him, nor from Hell

One step, no more than from himself, can fly

By change of place, Now conscience wakes despair

That slumbered; awake the bitter memory

Of what he was, what is, and what must be."

BUT

[We are not either very pleased with the cuddly approach of his 'Out-of this -World' leader who has only in the last few days after a year in the job to acknowledge that the

FAMILY is the BEDROCK

of a stable law-abiding society.

After a year on trial we have to say that he has fulfilled what we expected from him

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

He goes into his second year with a possibility that he is heading in the right direction and we don't mean the ice packs or sky diving over the hole in the ozone layer but down on EARTH and build on a fellow colleagues example-But please no apologizing for ANYTHING because up to now you have done NOTHING that even resembles a SERIOUS THOUGHT but there are now hopes that the Iceman is beginning to melt to show - dare we say it -a prospective PRIME MINISTER in the making. But is early days yet because he is still the SILENT MAN when the matter of the EU is raised and unless he takes into his confidence his deepest thoughts on the most important subject which has faced the country  in its long history many more will desert him and his party.

 

HAVE YOU ALL NOTICED THAT THE MEDIA  AND THE PRESS APPEAR UNWILLING TO RAISE THE SUBJECT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF ENGLAND COMPOSED OF THE REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

SURELY

IF THE EUROPEAN UNION IS SUCH A GOOD IDEA WHY  WONT THE POLITICIANS APPEAR IN PUBLIC AND DISCUSS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE OF A NATION STATE

-ITS FREEDOM AND LIBERTY?]

AND

ITS  ETHICAL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION

 

History tells us that it is to those nations in which the religious instinct is most implanted that their supremacy of the world belongs, and that because the struggle for existence is most strenuous. So in ethics the moral qualities descend from parents to children as distinctly as physical ones. A father and mother live wholesome lives, who do not allow their minds to be debased by ignoble thoughts and bequeath to their children minds of fine moral fibre which will bias their character towards the GOOD rather than to EVIL. By the coming together of similar minded individuals who will hand down their ethical strengths to future generations of healthy minds and bodies.

On the other hand  if parents give a loose rein to passion - if they poison their blood with the madness of blood, if they are flabby in moral principle and are given to lying and cheating these characteristics WILL descend upon their children. As is said the sins of the fathers shall be visited upon the children unto the third and fourth generation

Of course many spend their lives endeavoring to achieve these aims but the reality is that the absence of any interest at all in even contemplating the difficult but only true journey of life will result in the total breakdown of society and the eventual demise of a people who more than most has it in its power to regain its treasured links with the past and prove itself a force for GOOD

Many will say we live in a secular STATE and that there is no place for such matters but what have they to put in its place but the 'anything goes dogma' whatever its destructive character on society as a whole. Of course the individual has the freedom of his actions but unless the majority maintain the corrective course which in our usually cool though warming climate our people were renowned for their greater energy, greater keenness, industry, and all the qualities of the heart and head which came from a stern, strong nerved hardy race.

The drift over the past decades but even more so over the  past ten years to an abandonment of past values for the greater temporary excitement of release from all restraint has according to a recent poll left our people the most unhappy people among a host of nation states and a growing appetite for any new innovation which has cost the bodily health  and mind of many of our children and adults alike.

There has been much talk over the past few days of Victorian values and it is not too late to take in train the lessons to be learnt or find our future in the hands of those who have their own culture and values which if not matched by our own inherited truth will fill the void thus created and a different future will be ahead for our children and their children's children'

 

*

[The greater part of the above message is from the work of an author of the Victorian age and the early years of the 20th century -Sir Phillip Gibbs ]

 

*          *          *

[  Font altered -Bolding &Underlining used- Comments in brackets]

DECEMBER/06

*

 

H.F.1591

*  *  *

 

 

 

US ALL DRY

 

BLEEDING

Don't blame the heatwave for the hosepipe bans. Blame the

GREED, ineptitude and contempt for customers of water company bosses,

says

LEO McKINSTRY

LEO MCKINSTRY: Don't blame the heatwave for hosepipe ban - blame greed-DAILY MAIL.

With aching predictability, officialdom has seized on the heatwave to punish the British public.

The sunshine might have brought a warm glow to the nation, but it also serves as an excuse for corporate bosses to indulge in their favourite activities of guilt-tripping, rationing, finger-wagging and money-grabbing.

The water company United Utilities, which supplies seven million customers in the North-West of England, announced the introduction of a hosepipe ban across the region because of supposed shortages.

Anyone breaching this edict will face a criminal prosecution and a fine of up to £1,000. Welcome to sunny Britain, where filling the family paddling pool has been turned into a crime against the state.

 

United Utilities were panned for wanting to impose water bans while not tackling their own waste problems

The move by United follows the recent introduction of a hosepipe ban in Northern Ireland, and further restrictions are likely elsewhere, given the instinct of monopolistic organisations for bullying control dressed up as social concern.

Indeed, that impulse to hector people about their domestic habits was on full display last week when Rachel Fletcher, head of the water industry regulator Ofwat, told MPs that households should no longer use tap water for gardening and car washing.

Impose

'The idea of using treated drinking-quality water to water our gardens and wash our cars in the 21st century just doesn't seem appropriate,' she declared piously.

Issuing dire warnings about climate change and population growth, Ms Fletcher — who has had a long career in regulatory bureaucracy — also complained that only a minority of homes have water butts, while gardeners make far too little use of recycled bath or shower water.

But why should we swallow these lectures, given the miserable failures of the water firms to provide an efficient service and Ofwat to impose improvements in supplies?

 

Low water levels on Dove Stone Reservoir on Saddleworth Moor near Oldham as millions of people are facing a hosepipe ban, water company United Utilities has announced

The fact is that the industry is using both the good weather and the fashionable green agenda as a cloak to hide its own gross mismanagement.

This recent crisis is self-inflicted, for the water companies — supposedly regulated by Ofwat — have set new levels in the service sector for incompetence, greed and contempt for customers.

It is ridiculous that gardeners, bathers and car-washers now face severe restrictions because of such self-serving boardroom excess and refusal to invest in a decent infrastructure.

We should not be facing any restrictions, given our traditionally damp weather. Only a few months ago, we endured a hard winter and long, dull spring. Other, more southerly European countries, with far drier climates, manage better than we do in Britain.

Daily Mail reader, Ann Brook, wrote yesterday from Cadiz in south-west Spain that 'four months without a drop of rain is not uncommon, but there has never been a water shortage and there is lush greenery and trees everywhere'.

In line with current environmental posturing, the water companies talk of water as 'a precious resource'. Not only is such politically correct language absurd in our rainy island, but the firms' earnest rhetoric is also contradicted by their own reckless behaviour.

 

A major water leak on Oxford Road while four of Manchester's major hospitals are experiencing water problems

Every single day, 3 billion litres of drinking water — one fifth of the entire total pumped into the system — is allowed to drain away through leaks.

The companies now complain about the heat, yet earlier this year Thames Water, one of the biggest corporations, used the cold snap as an excuse to explain shortages in London, when around 20,000 households were left without water supplies owing to burst pipes.

One expert, Roland Gilmore of the Thames Blue-Green Economy, was deeply sceptical and said at the time: 'For water mains to be affected, the frost needs to penetrate 2ft underground. We haven't had that degree of penetration, so I don't believe them.' He's almost certainly right, given that in June 2017, Thames Water was fined £8.5 million for leaks totalling 47 million litres a day, while it was also reported the same year that for every 625 miles of mains in the region, there were 265 burst pipes.

Also, in March of that year, the company was fined £20 million, after allowing the upper reaches of the Thames to be contaminated with untreated sewage. The judge in the case condemned the firm for 'inadequate investment' and 'diabolical maintenance'.

What is so insulting about the present mess of the water industry is that while the public endures an expensive, over-priced service, a small group of fat cats is lapping up extra thick financial cream.

 

This United Utilities leak springs 30 feet into the air while the company's boss, Steve Mogford rakes in a huge pay rise

Largesse

As this paper revealed last month, the chief executives of nine water companies have personally raked in £58 million in the past five years.

One of the worst offenders is Steve Mogford, head of United Utilities which has imposed the present hosepipe ban in the North-West. Having profited from a £12 million package since 2013, he was handed £2.3 million last year.

Yet he was not even the best paid in the industry. That dubious position is held by 42-year-old Liv Garfield, who collected £2.45 million last year as the boss of Severn Trent Water.

There's not a shred of justification for this largesse. It's not as if water provision is a complex, risky business. The bosses pretend to be entrepreneurs, but they are really over-paid bureaucrats. Theirs is a simple model, with a captive market, an absence of competition and guaranteed revenues.

Last year, water bills, which have risen by 40 per cent in real terms since privatisation in 1989, brought in £11.7 billion, providing the companies with whacking profits of £2 billion.

It is this lucrative cash flow — not the interests of the British public — that really matters to the water companies.

This is because they are not connected to the customers they so ruthlessly exploit. Too many are remote entities, in the grip of international equity firms and foreign investors.

The abysmally run Thames Water, for instance, was owned from 2006 by Australian investment bank Macquarie, which paid no corporation tax and loaded the firm with debts of £10.6 billion.

Sold off last year, Thames is now in the hands of a consortium of 11 funds, including the Kuwait Investment Authority, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and the China Investment Corporation.

Profits

In similar vein, Northumbrian Water is owned by the investment vehicle, C.K. Hutchison, headed by Hong Kong billionaires, while Southern Water is the property of Greensands Holdings, an arm of the mighty international bank J.P. Morgan.

It's not surprising, therefore, that rather than focusing on customer service, the aim of so many water companies has been to maximise profits and shareholder dividends.

Earlier this year, Environment Secretary Michael Gove attacked the water firms' 'keen use of sophisticated financial engineering', through which they established 'multi-layer corporate structures of dizzying complexity, involving multiple subsidiaries, many of them based offshore'.

Most water companies now claim to be changing their ways and are withdrawing from links with havens such as the Cayman Islands. But it is too late — the damage has been done.

It will take far more than that to rebuild public trust, particularly when disruptive hosepipe bans are introduced.

The author C.S. Lewis once wrote that 'of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than omnipotent moral busybodies'.

Tragically, the water industry today manages to embody the traits both of robber barons and busybodies.

 

LEO MCKINSTRY: Don't blame the heatwave for hosepipe ban - blame greed-DAILY MAIL.

JULY 18,2018

H.F.1624

*  *  *

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

 

Arrests in August; 9/11 announcement in September; and Jubilee in October?

The good guys are continuing to win the secret battle for the planet earth in a big way, multiple sources confirm.  As things now stand, there will be a new wave of mass arrests in August, official government disclosure about 9/11 in September, and some sort of “major economic announcement in October,” Pentagon sources claim.

Behind the scenes, meetings involving the Knights of Malta, Russian FSB officials, Asian secret societies, and others are preparing the way for an economic announcement that could well be a genuine jubilee accompanied by a new financial system, according to sources involved in the negotiations.  Since the negotiations are ongoing, the details have yet to be hammered out, but a general consensus does exist, the sources say.

The key may be U.S. President Donald Trump’s imminent takeover of the Supreme Court, which would pave the way for war crimes trials and the legal recognition of a new financial system when it convenes in October, Pentagon sources say.

On that front, the “battle rages, as Trump’s super-elite stopped Bush operative Brett Kavanaugh and may succeed in getting a woman or an Indian [Native American] nominated,” the sources say.

The situation has reached the point where The New York Times has actually called for “Godfather” tactics and armed rebellion because Trump and his backers were poised to take over control of the Supreme Court.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/07/07/new-york-times-calls-godfather-tactics-stop-trumps-scotus-nominee/

Do not be surprised if military police soon occupy that treasonous paper’s offices.  Since they have consistently, and criminally, suppressed the truth about the murder of 3,000 New Yorkers on September 11, 2001, such a move would be long overdue.

We also have former U.S. Defense Secretary (and traitor) Leon Panetta saying European leaders “are scared to death” that U.S. troops will be pulled out of Europe.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/trump-us-troops-europe-leaders-scared-eu-panetta-germany-uk-france-baltic-a8437111.html?utm_source=reddit.com

They should be scared to death, since they are mostly war criminals who would have already been jailed and possibly even executed if the U.S. military were not protecting them.

The corporate press is also now following this newsletter (remember, you read it here first) in reporting that NATO and the post-war system are in mortal danger.  We have Bloomberg reporting that embattled German Chancellor Angela Merkel is resolved “to fight for the survival of post-World War II global institutions.”
http://www.bakersfield.com/ap/national/merkel-warns-of-worldwide-financial-crisis/article_2dff7b52-12a8-5a67-86b0-e4b9324607aa.html

We also have the Khazarian whore, court bard Bono warning hundreds of UN officials that the United Nations, the EU, NATO, and the Group of Seven are “under attack.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/prime-minister-honors-87-irish-un-peacekeepers-died-175547438.html

They are under attack, because their leadership has been plotting to murder 90% of humanity, and their incompetence is leading to the largest destruction of life on the planet since the dinosaurs were wiped out 65 million years ago.

Of course, as usual the Khazarian mafia is trying to murder, lie, and bribe in order to stay in power.  The latest casualty was Chinese HNA Group chairman Wang Jian, who news reports claim “fell to his death after posing for a photo in France,” last week.
https://www.rt.com/news/431745-hna-chairman-dead-france-wang-jian/

Mossad sources say it was “no accident” and that he was “taken out, as he was about to testify in a closed hearing regarding…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

The revolution continues as old regimes collapse in Mexico and the EU, plus secret space program disclosure

The criminal cabal that has been ruling the planet earth is being systematically removed from power, with the latest being regime change in Mexico and soon the EU.  Furthermore, the power struggle in Washington D.C. is definitely being won by the good guys.

Also, apparently some real disclosure is occurring about both the Roswell “UFO” incident and anti-gravity technology.  The two links below were sent to us by Japanese military intelligence and they say they are genuine (although this is not an area in which this writer has much expertise).  One appears to be a patent application for an anti-gravity craft, while the other claims to be a top-secret document stating that alien bodies and alien spacecraft really were recovered by the U.S. government.  We leave it to experts to determine if they are real.  If they are, though, it won’t be long before flying saucers appear in the showrooms.
http://d3adcc0j1hezoq.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Ultra-Top-Secret-MITD.pdf
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/7a/2e/a1/db08e8429a89a2/US20030209637A1.pdf

What is definitely real, though, is the ongoing revolution in the West.  Pentagon sources are now saying the number of sealed indictments in the U.S. is now up to 40,000 and that mass arrests are likely to start in the autumn.

For those who say the arrests will never happen, we can answer that many thousands have already been arrested or removed from power.  Over 50 congressmen and senators have resigned, and the top ranks of the Justice Department, State Department, FBI, and CIA have been thoroughly cleansed of Khazarian mob servants.  We have also seen the deaths of many of the top Khazarian mobsters, including David Rockefeller, Jacob de Rothschild, George Soros, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Bill Gates, etc.

What we are all waiting for now is to see some of the remaining top Khazarian mobsters like the Bushes, the Clintons, Barack Obama, and Benjamin Netanyahu (Mileikowsky) perp-walked in handcuffs in front of the world media.  That day is coming soon.

The Vatican is also continuing to clean up its act.  On that front, our Pentagon sources note that “While Aussie Cardinal George Pell is on trial for pedophilia, Bill Clinton’s Cardinal Ted McCarrick in D.C. is charged with rape of a minor.”
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/details-of-the-homosexual-molestation-charges-against-cardinal-mccarrick

Cardinal Pell’s case is important because he was Vatican minister of the economy, and as such, was in charge of the Vatican Bank and its secret bribe accounts held in the name of most so-called world “leaders.”  His removal is opening the way for a massive Vatican campaign in African and Latin America to fight poverty and environmental destruction.  Also, since Pell is from Australia, his removal means that vast stores of gold on the Island of Bougainville may soon be made available for the people of the planet earth, according to Vatican sources.

One of the main remaining Khazarian power centers, the BIS—the central bank of central banks—is now being told to return the stolen gold they have used to finance the so-called G7 and G20 groups of nations, according to members of Asian and Western secret societies.

This will become visible to the Western public during and after the NATO meeting scheduled for July 11th and 12th, where the biggest changes in European governance since World War 2 will be set into motion.  The Russian and Chinese governments as well as the Pentagon have decided to…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Western civilization continues to implode as old paradigms cease to function

The old regime in the U.S. and Europe is collapsing in a way that is now becoming obvious even to the most brainwashed and illiterate Westerners.  This collapse ultimately stems from the social instability cause by extreme concentration of wealth in the hands of a very small clique of closely interbred oligarchs now known as the Khazarian mafia.  Fortunately, a revolution has begun that will soon liberate the West, and the rest of humanity, from these self-appointed, war-loving social engineers.

For now, though, there are multiple signs of a very dangerous and chaotic summer as the old system collapses.  In the U.S., the undeclared civil war that has been raging since the election of Donald Trump may lead to nuclear terror inside the U.S. by Khazarian mafiosi, say CIA and other sources.
http://www.tomheneghanbriefings.com/

If this happens, retaliation will wipe out the Khazarian strongholds in Israel, Switzerland, Italy, and elsewhere, Pentagon sources say.

One of many signs of how open the warfare within the U.S. government has become came last weekend when Trump tweeted about the “Russian Witch Hunt,” noting that, “With all of the bias, lying, and hate by the investigators, people want the investigators investigated.  Much more will come out.”  This was followed within an hour by a tweet from former CIA head John Brennan saying, ““Your fear of exposure is palpable.  Your desperation even more so!” and calling for a coup d’état against Trump, something that in normal times would lead to his arrest for treason.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/john-brennan-in-ominous-tweet-to-pres-trump-calls-for-insurrection-by-cabinet-gop-leadership/

Then we have one of Canada’s leading news magazines openly and only half-jokingly calling for an invasion of the U.S. because “America has become a failed state.”
https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/the-case-for-invading-america/

We also have the head of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg, saying in a speech in London that, “It is not written in stone that the trans-Atlantic bond will survive forever.”
https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2018-06-21/nato-head-no-guarantee-trans-atlantic-alliance-will-survive#close-modal

We could go on and on pointing out signs of a major undeclared civil war in the West, but the media is so saturated with this that doing so would become redundantly repetitive again and again.

The reason for this extreme high tension is impending military action on several fronts by both the U.S. and Russian armed forces that could depose several governments and change world maps, say Pentagon, CIA, FSB, and other sources.

Big military action is most likely in the Ukraine, Israel, and …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

H.F.730

*  *  *

 

Brexiteers say Amazon is scared of paying more TAX after UK chief delivers chilling warning about ‘civil unrest’ if there is no deal with EU

  • Doug Gurr, UK manager for the US online giant, said no-deal could spark chaos 
  • He issued warning to business reps at meeting on Friday organised by Mr Raab
  • Sceptical attendees were said to have raised an eyebrow at the CEO's remarks 

 

Doug Gurr, UK manager for the US online giant, issued the warning on Friday

 

Amazon's UK chief is facing a backlash today after claiming there could be civil unrest within two weeks if Britain leaves the EU with no deal.

Doug Gurr issued the extraordinary warning at a meeting on Friday organised by Brexit secretary Dominic Raab. 

Gurr, UK manager for the US online giant, implied there could be riots and protests when he made the remarks in front of representatives of Britain's biggest businesses. 

Attendees were said to have been shocked by his assessment, with some expressing scepticism.

And Brexiteers were incensed, suggesting the firm was worried it would be made to pay more tax after the UK leaves the EU.

A spokesman for Amazon refused to confirm or deny the remarks.

But the spokesman told the Times: 'Like any business, we consider a wide range of scenarios in planning discussions so that we're prepared to continue serving customers and small businesses who count on Amazon, even if those scenarios are very unlikely.

'This is not specific to any one issue — it's the way we plan for any number of issues around the world.'

Dover MP Charlie Elphicke said: 'Out of Europe we will be able to take back control of our tax system - including making @amazon collect UK VAT as they are now required to do in Australia. 

'No wonder they want us to sign up to stop us doing that.'

Tory former minister Robert Halfon said: 'More likely to be civil unrest when Amazon delivery drones drop packages in wrong garden/or front drive.'

Fellow Conservative Marcus Fysh said: 'Time to make @amazon contribute to rather than asset strip the UK retail environment.'  

In his first television interview since becoming Brexit secretary earlier this month, Mr Raab accused Brussels yesterday of 'irresponsibly' ramping up pressure in withdrawal negotiations.

Mr Raab was scathing about comments from Brussels stating that a no deal scenario would mean there would be no specific arrangements in place for UK citizens living on the continent, or for EU migrants in Britain after withdrawal.  

'I think that's a rather irresponsible thing to be coming from the other side. We ought to be trying to reassure citizens on the Continent and also here,' he told The Andrew Marr Show on BBC One.

 

Tory MPs gave a withering response to the dire

warnings from Amazon's UK chief

 

Brexit secretary Dominic Raab (left) and EU Chief Brexit Negotiator Michel Barnier shake hands at Brexit talks last Thursday 

'There is obviously an attempt to try and ramp up the pressure.'

Mr Raab said that he would return to Brussels for talks on Thursday and try everything he could to get the best deal. 

Asked if reports the Government was planning to stockpile food for a no deal outcome were true, Mr Raab said: 'No. That kind of selective snippet that makes it into the media I think is – to the extent that the public pay attention to it – I think is unhelpful.'  

 

 

Daily Mail - No deal could cost the EU £200billion and a million jobs

*  *  *

H.F.1628

*  *  *

 

It's one of Europe's most proudly liberal nations. So why is Denmark

 

banning the burka and

 

threatening to end benefits for migrants whose children

 

 

don't integrate?

  • 'Ghetto' Mjolnerparken is set to be ‘eradicated’ by 2030,
  • following the introduction of
  • controversial laws aimed at protecting ‘Danishness’
  • All families in ghettos will send toddlers to day centres to learn
  • Danish values
  • Non-Western immigrants grown from 50,000 in 1980 to almost
  • 500,000 today 

 

e-mail

 

View
comment

 

Juicy pomegranates are piled outside the entrance to a supermarket in Norrebro, a district of Copenhagen. There are queues of customers at the till most of the day and into the early hours, buying Middle Eastern pastries, exotic fruit, dates and ice-cream which remind them of home.

Yet beside the pomegranates is a deep hole in the metal door frame. It was made one night by a bullet fired from a 9mm pistol by a member of a drug gang guarding his trading pitch near by.

Ismail Schbaita, a 55-year-old originally from Palestine who helps runs the supermarket, remembers the chilling moment last March only too well. ‘The gunman was high on drugs. Luckily, his bullet missed the staff and the customers. Gangs are always shooting each other around here.’

For Norrebro is a dangerous area of the Danish capital. A stone’s throw from the supermarket is the city’s most notorious housing estate, Mjolnerparken, where mothers told me this week they are afraid to let their children walk to the sweet shop alone because of the knifings and shootings.

Mjolnerparken, with its drab apartment blocks and shabby streets, has been categorised as a ghetto by the Danish Government.

 

Zaynab (centre, pictured with friends Amira and Sabrina) lives in Mjolnerparken, Copenhagen's most notorious housing estate, which has been categorised as a ghetto by the Danish Government

 

These ghettos are due to be ‘eradicated’ by 2030, following the introduction of controversial laws aimed at protecting ‘Danishness’ and ridding the country of so-called ‘parallel’ societies (pictured: Mjolnerparken)

Across the country, 21 other such places with high crime rates, soaring unemployment and more than 50 per cent non-Western residents have been given the same name. They are due to be ‘eradicated’ by 2030, following the introduction of controversial laws aimed at protecting ‘Danishness’ and ridding the country of so-called ‘parallel’ societies.

Later this year, legislation will force all families living in these ghettos to send their toddlers, as young as one year old, to approved day centres to learn the Danish language and Danish values.

The children will have to complete 25 hours of compulsory state education and, while the primary focus will be on language skills and learning, the plan is to educate the mainly Muslim children in the Danish way of life, as well as to give instruction on religious holidays, Christmas and Easter, and their importance in the Christian calendar.

Parents who fail to sign up have been told they could lose their child benefits.

This is the radical policy of a government that, like so many others in Europe, has accepted hundreds of thousands of migrants over recent years and is trying desperately to tackle the problems of integration. Indeed, the challenges Denmark is wrestling with are replicated across the EU as countries including Greece, Italy, Austria and Germany struggle to assimilate large numbers of

 

 

 

 

One disturbing common factor in these countries has been the emergence of strong far-Right political parties, and a return of the kind of ugly nationalism many hoped had died after World War II.

Denmark has long been proud of its reputation as a liberal, tolerant nation. But the fact that it has been forced to introduce tough laws to accelerate integration of migrants shows such tolerance has its limits.

Inevitably, some say the new laws are ‘racist’. They include a burka ban from next month, with fines of up to £1,200 for repeat transgressors. In the inner-city ghettos — where last year two thirds of residents were non-Western immigrants — there will be double the normal penalties for those who commit crimes.

Police will be given the freedom to conduct more intense surveillance of residents in order to curb extremism and violence, while migrant parents who send older children on trips back to their home countries in the Middle East and Africa could face four-year jail sentences if suspected of radicalisation.

The centre-Right Prime Minister, Lars Lokke Rasmussen, says these new laws are necessary because the number of first and second-generation non-Western immigrants has grown from 50,000 in 1980 to almost 500,000 today — a sizeable proportion, in a country of only 5.7 million people.

Rasmussen has said: ‘People with the same problems have clumped together. We have (until now) let it go, perhaps with the naive idea that integration would happen on its own over time ... but it hasn’t.’

 

Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen says these new laws are necessary because the number of first and second-generation non-Western immigrants has grown from 50,000 in 1980 to almost 500,000 today — a sizeable proportion, in a country of only 5.7 million people 

Inger Stojberg, the hardline integration minister, has gone further. The crackdown on ghettos — a word with awful Nazi overtones, to which the Danish policymakers seem oblivious — is a centrepiece of her legislative reforms.

When Stojberg clocked up her 50th amendment to the laws relating to migrants, she baked a celebratory cake and posted a smiling picture of herself with it online.

All this sounds very un-Danish. Yet more and more people here — even some migrants — seem to agree with her. Mr Schbaita, at the bullet-hit supermarket, told me: ‘It is too late to stop the problem of parallel societies in my lifetime. But I hope the new laws will help future generations live together.

‘The problems in the ghettos are caused by ignorance about Western ways and a lack of education.’

He says employers won’t hire anyone who says they live in Mjolnerparken. This means the residents are often poor, at a loose end and ‘turn to crime’.

He says migrants were originally placed in Mjolnerparken because the Government wanted to give the mainly Muslim incomers a sense of community. ‘It was a humanitarian act, a kindness. But now the politicians are asking what went wrong in this part of town.’

Mr Schbaita left Palestine for Moscow to train as a pharmacist before arriving in Denmark, where he married a fellow Muslim and raised a family.

His solution to the problems is to pull down the ghettos. But he is concerned that the new laws are being pushed by a small political elite who unfairly blame Muslims for all the country’s wrongs.

He may be right. Yet indigenous Danes have shown remarkable enthusiasm for the changes.

One of Inger Stojberg’s most popular ideas is for migrants who have lived in Denmark for more than three years to pay for translators’ services when visiting a doctor, rather than relying on the State.

She says: ‘Unless we dare to make demands on foreigners, we will fail to address the serious problems of parallel societies where people neither work nor speak the language and don’t have Danish values.

‘A good place to start is to give back responsibility to those who have come here: learn the language or pay for your interpreter.’

In a poll by the newspaper B.T., 93 per cent of Danes questioned agreed with the minister’s plan.

Miles away from the ghettos, on the outskirts of Copenhagen, there are quiet, well-ordered towns where daily life appears, at first glance, untroubled by the controversies over migration.

 

Inger Stojberg, the hardline integration minister, has gone further. The crackdown on ghettos is a centrepiece of her legislative reforms. When Stojberg clocked up her 50th amendment to the laws relating to migrants, she baked a cake and posted a picture of herself with it online

One of them is Hvidovre, where there is no mosque and the old Protestant church with the Danish flag flying proudly outside on a manicured lawn has a flourishing 7,000-strong membership.

Yet even here immigration is a heated topic.

‘People are afraid of the consequences,’ said Annette Bjerregaard, 54, who works at the church. ‘If they feel people are integrating, they are positive. If not, they are not so positive.’

Annette’s son went to what was known among local Danes as ‘the white school’, where all the pupils were ethnic Danes. In this part of town there are neat privately owned homes, shops and pavement cafes.

Yet a mile away in a poorer part of Hvidovre it is very different. Here 5,000 people, both foreigners and Danes, live together in a sprawling council-run housing estate.

Larry Ellis, a debonair 65-year-old resident with a shock of white hair, works as a gardener at the local university. Having finished his shift, he is relaxing with friends outside the estate’s community centre.

They all agree there are too many migrants coming to Denmark. ‘That is the problem and it has not been addressed for years,’ he says.

‘Even here, we are housed in different parts of the estate to the migrants. The council has put ethnic Danes in blocks on one side of the road and Muslims in blocks on the other. We just don’t mix, and religion is part of it.’

This does not bode well for the Government’s efforts to encourage integration. And indeed, some Danes want to crack down against migrants still harder.

As the mainstream politicians react to a growing sense of disillusion about mass migration, a new party led by a 42-year-old architect called Pernille Vermund has seized the moment.

The divorced mother of three, who lives far from the Copenhagen ghettos, hopes her party — the New Right — will gain seats in elections next year on a hardline anti-migrant manifesto.

It calls for the residence permit of any ‘foreigner convicted in court’ to be withdrawn and for no more welfare benefits, housing subsidies and other state payments to anyone except Danish citizens.

She told me: ‘Politicians for decades have let people into our country who do not share our values. They do not assimilate. Now the politicians make a patchwork of rules to try to correct their own mistakes. Forcing Muslim mothers to deliver their toddlers into state-run daycare is not going to make them Danish, or less Muslim. It simply will not work.’

Her views would have been condemned as xenophobic extremism in liberal Denmark a few years ago. But mass immigration has hardened attitudes.

Politicians fear that if they ignore the problem, they will lose ground to parties such as the New Right.

 

Miles away from the ghettos, there are quiet, well-ordered towns, including Hvidovre (pictured) where daily life appears untroubled by the controversies over migration. There is no mosque and the old Protestant church has a flourishing 7,000-strong membership. Yet even here immigration is a heated topic

Back in Mjolnerparken, where 1,752 people of 38 nationalities live cheek by jowl, I meet one of the community elders.

An Iraqi Kurd by birth, smartly dressed Taher Mustafah, 59, came to Denmark in 1985. He has worked for years as a civil servant and helped run an Islamic charity.

We stand on a busy street corner to chat, as Danish girls in skimpy shorts cycle past women with veiled faces shepherding children along pavements, closely watched over by their husbands. Truly, it is a stark clash of cultures.

Taher looks at one of the veiled women and shakes his head.

‘I know her,’ he says. ‘She is Tunisian and her husband is an Iraqi. My view is that if you live in a country, you should show respect for the society in which you live. She should not wear the burka here in Denmark and soon she will not be allowed to.’

Yet nearby, in an Iraqi-owned cafe, I hear a different opinion from an Iraqi migrant father called Jaber Saleh, 40, who is eating a pitta bread-and-hummus lunch with his wife Farah, 29, and son Hassan, six.

The Salehs are angry with the Danish Government. Despite living and working here as a truck driver for 17 years, Jaber has still not been granted citizenship.

Since the day he arrived, he has clung to his roots. He sent his son to an Arabic school in Copenhagen until it was closed by the Government, which accused some staff of having links to terrorism.

‘The Government was wrong,’ says Jaber. ‘It was a good school where Hassan was taught in the Arabic language, not Danish, and he learnt the Koran. He speaks Arabic at home and has no Danish friends, and I am pleased about that. I don’t want him to learn from them bad things, the swearing, the low moral code of Denmark.

‘This society is too lax. I will do anything to avoid my son learning the values of Denmark.’

As I help Hassan write his name in the English alphabet in my notebook, I wonder what life will bring for this bright, well-behaved child, growing up torn between two cultures.

His family are not preparing him for life as a Dane and, in a rapidly changing country, he may never be accepted as one even if he wishes to be.

And that surely spells trouble for him and his adopted nation. 

 

e-mail

 

View
comment

 

 

 

 

  *  *  *

 

Hijab by country - Wikipedia

 

*

H.F.1621

*  *  *

     
 

The Muslim cleric who blames British mosques for the 7/7 bombings, says multiculturalism is a disaster and would throw Islamic fanatics out

By

 Richard Pendlebury
 on 30th April 2009

 

You can usually find at least one in any saloon bar, ready to give you the benefit of their peppery views on the parlous state of Britain today.
 

This particular example is a clean shaven, middle-aged man with the de rigueur attire of carefully knotted mustard tie and blue, golf club-style blazer.
 

Brass cuff buttons flash as he pounds an angry fist on to his knee.
 

 

7/7

Terror: The bus destroyed in the 7/7 London bombings

'I will give £5 to anyone in Britain who wants to live under Sharia law,' he declares. 'It will help pay for their ticket to Sudan, Yemen, Pakistan, or wherever it is customary to live under Sharia law.

'Please, please go and leave us alone. This is Britain, not 10th century Arabia!'

We are indeed sitting in a bar, on a busy main road in Oxford.
 

But the man before me is no stereotypical Islamophobe.
 

For one, he is sipping a glass of water rather than something more inflammatory.
 

More importantly, though by no means obviously, Dr Taj Hargey is himself an Islamic cleric; perhaps the most controversial imam in Britain today.
 

In an age when the highest-profile Muslim preachers are bearded, anti-Western firebrands such as Abu Hamza or Omar Bakri Dr Hargey seems an anomaly.
 

He does not care much for male facial hair. He believes that women can be both seen and heard, even in a mosque at Friday prayers.
 

And don't even get him started on the sort of fanatics who blow up London buses, or the poisonous teachings that inspired them.
 

After three men were cleared this week on charges of assisting the July 7 bombers, there have been calls for an inquiry into blunders made by the security services.
 

But Dr Hargey has little doubt who, and what, is truly to blame for unleashing such terrorism on our streets.
 

 

'It is the extremist ideology present in many UK mosques which is the cement behind nihilistic plots such as this,' he says. 'They are twisting Islam.'

Muslim

Violence: Dr Taj Hargey deplores fanatics such as the suicide bombers who targeted London

He has little or no time for the Government's 'pussyfooting' policy of encouraging multiculturalism.
 

'That is the biggest disaster to happen to Britain since World War II,' he says. 'It has given the extremist mullahs the green light for radicalism and segregation. We have to, we must, adjust to British society. And we can do so without losing our faith.'
 

Hardly surprisingly, such statements have made him wildly unpopular among those who adhere to the brand of ultra-conservative Saudi-funded Wahhabi Islam which currently makes most noise in Britain and around the world.
 

Certainly, if you Google Dr Hargey's name you will find him vilified as a 'charlatan' on any number of Islamic website forums.
 

In return, he is quite happy to describe his critics as 'fanatics'. Recently, one hostile publication went too far.
 

When we meet, Dr Hargey, 56, is still basking in the glow of his successful libel action against the English-language Muslim Weekly newspaper, which had accused him of being a heretic.
 

Earlier this month it agreed to pay him a five-figure sum and issue a grovelling apology, which was a little more esoteric than most heard in the High Court.
 

It stated: 'Dr Taj Hargey has never subscribed to, belonged to or been affiliated with any sect or minority group, religious or otherwise. On the contrary, Dr Hargey has consistently and openly reiterated his unconditional belief in the absolute finality of prophethood in Islam and Mohammed (peace and blessings upon him) as God's last prophet and final messenger.'
 

Afterwards, the cleric described the case as a 'watershed moment' in the battle between 'progressives' such as himself and what he called the 'Muslim McCarthyists', after the U.S. senator who accused opponents of being communist and 'un-American' with little or no evidence. 

 

Muslim

Headscarves: Dr Hargey says they are not necessary

But despite his victory, or perhaps because of it, when his phone rings now it is still almost as likely to be an anonymous death threat as a request for spiritual guidance.
 

Certainly more people hate him than follow him.
 

'The masses have been brainwashed by the mullahs,' he says.
 

Which begs the question: can this intellectual Oxford imam really succeed with his ambition to lead a 'reformation' of British Islam? Or will medieval orthodoxy triumph in the end?
 

Dr Hargey was born and raised in apartheid- era South Africa. The racist state classified him as 'coloured', a second-class citizen. 

One of eight children, his father was a supermarket packer; his mother illiterate.
 

But Hargey was a natural scholar and destined for a better, if consistently controversial, existence.
 

His first battles were against the Pretoria government, rather than fundamentalists from his own faith. 

'The masses have been brainwashed by the mullahs'

The attention he received from the South African security services prefigured the intimidation and intolerance he says he receives from British extremists today: 'I was an anti-apartheid fighter, against institutionalised racism. 

'For me, Islam was a liberating vehicle for attaining justice on this Earth. I was pursued then by the South African secret police, so why should I fear these people now?'
 

Hargey attained his doctorate in Middle Eastern and Islamic studies from Oxford University. His thesis was on the slave trade in Anglo-Egyptian Sudan.
 

Back home, his CV shows that he taught history at the University of Cape Town before relocating to the U.S. in the 1980s to drum up funds for a projected South African-based anti-apartheid newspaper.
 

It is there that his efforts ran into his first experience of widely reported criticism, as allegations were made about his money-raising efforts.
 

'Prophet or Phoney?' was one newspaper headline, which, according to his critics, could equally apply to his current endeavours.
 

Whether these smears had any substance is unclear, although his combative approach has clearly attracted, if not invited, brickbats for the best part of a quarter of a century.
 

Nevertheless, he did hold down a number of academic posts in the United States, not least of which was a spell teaching African studies at the Sarah Lawrence University in New York State, alma mater of Rahm Emanuel, Barack Obama's White House Chief of Staff.
 

His latest venture is the Muslim Education Centre of Oxford, of which he is founding chairman.
 

Abu

Firebrand cleric: Abu Hamza

 

Dr Hargey also leads the city's Summertown Islamic congregation. 'The most progressive pulpit in the land, from which we do everything in English except prayer,' he states.
 

From a borrowed Masonic hall rather than a dedicated mosque, his enemies sneer.
 

The ideological core of his opposition towards the fashionable Islamic fundamentalists lies in his rejection of the absolute importance of hadith and Sharia law.
 

To explain, the Koran is the teaching of Allah, handed down to the Prophet Mohammed.
 

The hadiths, meanwhile, comprise the sayings and actions of Mohammed, as recorded by others, some time after his death.
 

For many Muslims, the hadiths are a fundamental guide and part of their faith. For Hargey, they are often unreliable and an obstacle to the integration of Islam into contemporary society. He believes the Koran is all.
 

'This is a big fight for the hearts and minds of Islam. There is nothing in the Koran which is incompatible with (living in) British society, unlike what I call "Mullah Islam" and their reliance on hadiths.'
 

And so he explains his position: 'These people say they have a right to stone adulterous women. We say show us where it says that in the Koran.
 

'The Koran must have precedence. It must be sovereign. Everything else is supplementary or subservient. All that stuff about jihad, women's rights, apostasy, all these issues come from the hadiths.
 

'We do not say get rid of the hadiths. But we do say that every hadith must pass two litmus tests.
 

First, it must not conflict with the Koran. Second, it must not conflict with reason or logic.
 

'One of the hadiths, for example, says the majority of people in Hell will be women. But let's do a forensic examination of this. First, let's look at the fact that 88 per cent of crimes are committed by men rather than women.
 

'How then, logically, can there be more women in Hell? Theologically, the Koran says that every human irrespective of gender will be rewarded for what they did and punished for what they did not.'
 

Of Sharia law he is even more dismissive. 'The Koran is clear that blasphemy is dealt with in the next life by God. The Sharia, meanwhile, is a medieval compilation of religious opinion which is not immutable, not eternal.
 

'How can we be dependant on 10th-11th-century jurists and scholars? It makes no sense.'
 

He also wants Muslims to integrate more with mainstream Britain.
 

'The (Muslim) reaction to 9/11 was to withdraw. I think the best way is to go out and belong. 

'I love this country, I follow Spurs and I go to the pub, if only to drink orange juice'

'If you met me walking down the street, for example, would you know I am a Muslim? No.
 

'I know I am a Muslim in my heart and my actions, not in my beard or the niqab face mask. The niqab only comes from a hadith and even that only refers to the Prophet's wives. This is a big fight for the hearts and minds of Islam. There is nothing in the Koran that is incompatible with (living in) British society.'
 

Of the cries of 'heretic' to which he is frequently subjected, he argues: 'Faith is between the person and God. No one can pronounce you a heretic (in Islam) and I think that is a wonderful thing.
 

'But we do need a reformation in Islam. We have to go back to the pristine principles in our faith. We need a British Islam and by that I do not mean a compromise.
 

'Christianity was once an alien faith. We have to integrate in a matter of decades rather than centuries.'
 

But what of the accusations that he is simply a State stooge? This angers him.
 

'I have called for Bush and Blair to be indicted at the international criminal court for their wars. What kind of stooge does that make me? 

'We have a multicultural community of men and women, including converts. We are not fanatics and appeal to a very broad constituency. We do not appeal to those who have been brainwashed by the mullahs.
 

These people refuse to debate with me and instead send their minions to do their dirty work on the internet or via anonymous phone calls. We get death threats, intimidation and blackmail tactics. But it does not dissuade us.
 

'Our group is based on the "Three Es": Enlightenment, Egalitarianism and Erudition.
 

But the Government, with its anti-terrorist strategy, has never contacted us, even though we say violence and suicide bombing are against the faith.
 

'What a mistake. In this city we have the Wahhabi-backed Oxford Centre of Islamic Studies. It preaches the most repressive and egregious theology.
 

'We want to establish an Oxford Centre for British Islam. We will have a mosque and the leader could be either male or female.'
 

So, for example, he has supported a state school which banned the niqab, much to the fury of his Muslim foes.
 

And last October he hosted the appearance in Oxford of Professor Amina Wadud, a female Islamic academic, who gave a sermon at Friday prayers before a mixed-gender congregation, which was anathema to the extremists.
 

Dr Hargey says: 'She is the undisputed authority on women in the Koran. We invited this heavyweight intellectual and the people who made the most protest outside our prayer hall were women dressed in niqabs who had been brainwashed by their menfolk.
 

'It was like the time of Emmeline Pankhurst and the suffragettes agitating for the vote.
 

'Then, many of the women were conditioned to think their behaviour a scandal. Now look at all those women walking past us who have the vote and think nothing of it.'
 

He also frowned on the recent extremist demonstration against the troops parading through Luton.
 

'While we feel it was an illegal war, you cannot punish the average squaddie for what is done in the name of New Labour and that toxic Texan.
 

'Yes, the war was wrong, but you cannot call soldiers murderers, or cowards. My life's work is to make British Muslims integrated.'
 

He is also utterly dismissive of the Muslim Council of Britain, which until the Government's recent reversal of policy, was the state's contact point with British Islam.
 

'They are Indo-Pakistani and sexist,' he says. 'It's a reactionary group, infused with the repressive ideology of the Wahhabis.
 

'If we go along their path we will have a ghetto mentality, segregated and giving our enemies such as the British National Party the opportunity to target us like the Jews in the 1930s. Isolation is our greatest peril.'
 

For the record, he supported BNP leader Nick Griffin's recent appearance at an Oxford Union debate, although he certainly did not endorse his views.
 

'We should not silence him. We should expose him.
 

'I love this country, I follow Spurs and I go to the pub, if only to drink orange juice. I am also a Muslim. But I am not a threat. If people like me are smothered then we will all sleep less safely in our beds.
 

'These people are religious fascists. The view that Islam is incompatible with British society is something that the Muslim Council of Britain and their hangers- on have promulgated.'
 

And with that, he adjusts the knot in his mustard tie, drains the last drop of his (non-alcoholic) drink and leaves the bar.
 

He may be a deeply controversial imam. But he is undoubtedly a brave one.

 

 

 
     

*  *  *

     
 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM APRIL,2009

 

What if YOU were a young Palestinian?
 

By

 Andrew Alexander
 

April 8, 2009

 

The easiest thing to do with terrorists is to rage at them. Or to declare, mindlessly, that we must strengthen 'the war on terrorism'. Both are moral self-indulgence and mental idleness.

We should be trying to get into the minds of those committing such acts, those supporting them and those who might yet be drawn in. The starting point is inevitably the Middle East, pulsating with millions of refugees, the raw material of terrorism.

Suppose that you are a young man living in Gaza, dominated by refugees or their descendants whose original homeland was what is now Israel. You may well have been brought up on stories, sometimes exaggerated, of a home where your forebears lived in security.

 

Palestinian

A young Palestinian boy: There will be no curb to terrorism until we stop waging wars on Muslim countries (file photo)
 

With squalid conditions in the refugee camps and little hope of good education or employment, your frustration and rage is easily directed at Israel, the U.S. as its relentless backer and probably us, too, as Washington's poodle like allies.

Or maybe you live in the West Bank, once part of Palestine. Since the 1967 war, Israel has left the West Bank littered with 600 checkpoints which divide even families.

This side of the border you will see ever-growing Israeli settlements. The details of the sheer illegality and subterfuge involved are readily provided by the protesting Jewish organisation Peace Now (www.peacenow.org).

Our young Palestinian will also remember so painfully Israel's punitive expedition against Gaza supposedly to crush the governing party, Hamas, whose military wing launched sporadic, but not very effective, rockets on Israel.

Yet this only begins to touch on the millions in the Middle East with deep grievances.

More from Andrew Alexander...

The deaths resulting directly or indirectly from the Iraq invasion are put by reputable researchers at around the million mark (more than we suffered in World War II).

Nearly five million were forced from their homes, either fleeing abroad or to safe places in Iraq.

The breakdown in public services caused by the West's sanctions on Iraq after the First Gulf War also led to hundreds of thousands of deaths. And we have not even touched on the deaths in the Lebanon interventions, particularly after Israel's attack to 'crush' the extremist Hezbollah.

Significantly, Hamas and Hezbollah had electoral triumphs following Israeli attacks.

In Afghanistan, refugees from the Taliban have had to face returning to a land where the seven-year war against the invader has reinvigorated that awful organisation.

Throughout the Middle East, tales can be heard of relatives or friends who have fallen victim to the U.S. and its allies, including Israel, over recent decades, often accompanied by grim details about trigger-happy U.S. troops, ideal villains.

Our young man in Gaza or the West Bank grows up dangerously full of frustration and anger. His religion seems a stabilising force in an unstable world.

For our part, Christianity has long had its own revered martyrs. Your local church may be dedicated to one. We should beware the fact that Islam has an entrenched appeal to martyrdom.

Those with deep grievances, actual or inherited, number many millions. Just think about the scale of this. There are about 300 million Muslim Arabs (plus Iran). Pakistan, now being drawn into the conflict, adds many more.

If only a tiny fraction takes the Jihadist path, we face a formidable and, alas, growing host. Can we be surprised that Islamic extremists find no difficulty in recruitment?

We are very stupid  -  as stupid as Chamberlain at Munich  -  to ignore the scale or nature of the menace.

There will be no curb to terrorism until we stop waging wars on Muslim countries and, even more, until the problem of the Arab-Israeli conflict is ended or at least ameliorated.

Washington holds all the levers. It is the source of huge economic and military aid to Israel. President Clinton nearly achieved a settlement, but was balked at the last moment by the then Palestinian leadership.

At least he tried. Other presidents have declined to pressure Israel into the necessary concessions and Britain's efforts has amounted to little more than pious pleading.

Of course, the Zionist lobby in the U.S. and elsewhere is powerful. In the American case, Jewish Zionism is augmented by various Evangelical Churches that excitedly grasp at the state of Israel as fulfilling Old Testament prophecies.

In the propaganda battle here as in the U.S., Zionists are adept at playing the anti-Semitic card, so familiar to fair-minded journalists. The BBC in particular is easily scared.

Developments within Israel are grim. Its crazy system of proportional representation gives every loony some power in coalition governments. Hence we have the notorious extremist Avigdor Lieberman in the post of Foreign Minister.

Israeli organisations such as Peace Now, which once organised a 400,000-strong demonstration against the Lebanon intervention in 1982, face an uphill battle. Yet the chance for peace does not depend on Israeli political manoeuvring.

President Obama has the real, unquestionable power to impose a settlement. How hard he tries affects everybody, particularly us.

*

 

AFGHANISTAN THE ROAD TO RUIN AND DEATH FOR THE BRITISH ARMY

by Daily Mail - Columnist Andrew Alexander

 

 

*

 [Font Altered-Bolding & underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

APRIL-2009

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM APRIL,2009

 

H.F.1619
 
     

*  *  *

REMAINERS NEED TO REFLECT

ON A

STATEMENT

OF A

WORLDLY-WISE BUSINESSMAN

Sir Rocco Forte

CONFIRMS

REMAINERS MINDS REMAIN

CLOSED

TO

REASON & REALITY!

*

SIR ROCCO FORTE thunders... why the prophets of doom have got it so wrong...

FULL ARTICLE

* * *

[This must be one of the most instructive and powerful deliveries on the true purpose of the EU in it's march to an ever - closer union and to a bureaucratic empire'

In the words of the TRUTH-SEEKER and PATRIOT Christopher Story

the

EU

IS THE ENEMY OF NATION STATES.]

THE+EUROPEAN+UNION+COLLECTIVE-ENEMY+OF+ITS+MEMBER+STATES+BY+CHRISTOPHER+STORY

*  *  *

JULY 6,2018

H.F.1601/1

*  *  *

 

 

Why seeing the same doctor every time could save your life: Patients are open about symptoms, trusting of medical advice and inclined prescriptions from familiar GP

  • Researchers from University of Exeter Medical School looked at 1.4m patients
  • Findings showed patients were more likely to die if they used different doctors 
  • One US study found nearly a fifth of diabetes patients who saw different GPs died within three years

Patients who see the same doctor at every appointment are far less likely to die early, a major study has found.

They are more open about their symptoms, more trusting of medical advice and more inclined to take their prescription.

The research looked at 22 studies covering more than 1.4 million patients from countries such as the UK, the US, France and the Netherlands. Eighteen of the studies showed patients were significantly more likely to die in a given period if they had appointments with different doctors or hospital consultants.

 

Research looking at 22 studies covering more than 1.4 million patients showed they were more likely to die in a given period if they had appointments with different doctors

The findings, from the University of Exeter Medical School, will cause concern as most patients are now unable to see the same GP at each appointment because surgeries are so short-staffed.

Hospitals are also understaffed and patients at specialist outpatient clinics often see different junior doctors rather than the consultant supervising their care.

The study’s lead author Sir Denis Pereira Gray, a former president of the Royal College of GPs, said: ‘Patients have long known that it matters which doctor they see and how well they can communicate with them.

‘Until now arranging for patients to see the doctor of their choice has been considered a matter of convenience or courtesy: now it is clear it is about the quality of medical practice and is literally a matter of life and death.’

One US study found nearly a fifth of diabetes patients – 18.5 per cent – who saw different GPs died within three years. This compared to just 8 per cent of those who saw the same doctor every time.

A British study found patients who were able to see their preferred GP were less likely to die from cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a severe lung condition linked to smoking.

However, senior GPs say they are unable to offer patients continuity of care as their surgeries are understaffed and struggling to cope with the demand. Increasing numbers of family doctors are also choosing to work part-time – particularly millennials – and the gaps are being filled by locums.

Last month, a study by the University of Leicester found that just half of patients had a preferred GP – and only half of them were able to see that doctor for most of their appointments.

Professor Kamila Hawthorne, of the Royal College of GPs, said: ‘Delivering continuity of care for patients is something GPs strive to do – we know our patients want and value it, as GPs do, and we know that it is particularly beneficial for patients with chronic conditions, long-term mental health issues and complex needs.

 

The findings, from the University of Exeter Medical School, will cause concern as most patients are now unable to see the same GP each time because surgeries are short-staffed

‘But general practice is currently facing intense resource and workforce pressures, which is making it increasingly difficult for patients to access our services and unfortunately, waiting to see “their” GP means patients may have to wait even longer for an appointment.’

Dr Richard Vautrey, from the British Medical Association’s GP committee, said: ‘The BMA has for a long time stressed the benefits of continuity of care with patients seeing the same GP or team over time.’

A spokesman for the Department of Health and Social Care said: ‘We want to ensure that everyone has access to GP services, including routine appointments at evenings and weekends – and millions of patients have already benefited from this. To improve access to patients and availability of appointments, we’re investing an extra £2.4 billion a year into general practice by 2021 and have a number of schemes in place to recruit and retain more doctors.’

The research was published in the journal BMJ Open.

Why seeing the same doctor every time could save your life

FULL ARTICLE

 

JUNE 29,2018

 

H.F.1590

*  *  *

THE TRUTH that BRUSSELS cannot BEAR:

PEOPLE CRAVE NATIONAL IDENTITY.

What happened in Catalonia on Sunday was shaming and shocking in a modern European state. Spanish police bludgeoned and assaulted defenceless civilians who were simply trying to exercise their democratic right.

First and foremost, this is a terrible crisis for the wrong-headed, bully-boy government in Madrid. After the unedifying spectacle of police attacking blameless voters, the chances must surely have increased of Catalonia – Spain’s most prosperous region with some 7.5million inhabitants – seceding.

But it is also an enormous crisis for the European Union, which in recent weeks has said almost nothing as the Spanish authorities arrested officials arranging an independence referendum on behalf of the devolved Catalan government.

 

 

 

One reason he did not do so in the case of Spain is that it is one of the most obedient pro-EU countries in Europe, which seldom defies the will of Brussels, or causes trouble for Juncker and his ilk.

But there is an even deeper reason for the Commission’s silence. The events in Catalonia challenge at a deep level its project for ever closer union, about which both Juncker and President Emmanuel Macron of France have ventilated in recent weeks.

For how can there be an amicable union between the EU’s nation states if some of those nations are themselves deeply divided and fractious, as is plainly the case with Catalonia and Spain?

Here is a region of largely Catalan-speaking people who regard themselves as culturally distinct. A sizeable proportion of them yearn to break free from Spain, even though Catalonia has been part of the country for hundreds of years.

Sunday’s vote illuminates a truth which Brussels cannot bear. There are many people in Europe for whom the atavistic call of identity counts far more than any exhortation about forging a European superstate

That, after all, was one of the main messages of Brexit – that the majority of voters in our own ancient nation resent the undemocratic control of Brussels, and have no wish to be sucked into a united Europe.

For Brussels, the example of Britain was bad enough, and it has set about trying to punish us for having had the effrontery to want to leave. In a sense, the demonstration of Catalan nationalism is even more alarming to the federalists because this show of independence is happening inside one of the EU’s nation states.

How is it possible, they wonder, for the pan-European project to proceed if some EU countries are in danger of fracturing? The terror in Brussels is that if Catalonia were allowed to break away, regions in other member states could follow suit. Instead of coalescing into an amorphous whole, some EU nations might fall apart.

Belgium, whose capital, Brussels, is the seat of EU expansionism, is divided. The Flemish-speaking region of Flanders, which constitutes about 60 per cent of the country’s population, is at daggers drawn with the French-speaking minority.

Many people in northern Italy long to be rid of the impoverished south, which is relatively unproductive and, in the view of northerners, consumes more than its fair share of government spending. The Right-wing Northern League has campaigned with some success for independence for the north, and imagines a separate country called Padania.

France faces an independence movement in the island of Corsica. Meanwhile the cohesion of Spain is threatened not just by free-spirited Catalans but also by militant Basques, part of whose territory lies in France.

Romania and Slovakia both have unhappy Hungarian minorities. Even in Poland’s region of Silesia, much of which used to be ruled by Germany until 1945, there are stirrings of an independence movement.

All over Europe apparently unified countries are harried by breakaway groups which have a strong sense of separate identity. If Catalonia were allowed to go it alone, who knows what might come next?


 

The problem for Brussels is that it is used to dealing with individual nation states but is powerless to intervene in unruly regions. That is why the Commission has remained so quiet in the case of Catalonia apart from expressing a few words of solidarity with Spain.

By the way, the British response has been regrettably supine. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson stressed his support for the Spanish government in a tweet. As the leading Brexiteer he should surely have been more critical of Madrid’s use of violence.

The Spanish government, it must be said, has behaved rashly and brutishly. Arguably some Catalan separatist political parties have been unwise in deliberately engineering a confrontation.

But given that the Catalan government had made numerous requests to hold a referendum on independence – after Spain’s constitutional court had controversially declared in 2010 that Catalonia was not a nation – what was it to do having been rebuffed time and time again? If it had possessed a modicum of good sense, the Spanish government would have allowed the referendum to go ahead. Had the vote been in favour of independence, it could have then questioned its legal status.

But to arrest Catalan officials, to close a large number of polling stations, and then to clobber innocent voters were acts of unbelievable stupidity as well as nastiness.

It passes understanding how the prime minister of Spain, Mariano Rajoy, can say that democracy has prevailed. The opposite is true.

Imagine if two or three years hence the Scottish National Party’s Nicola Sturgeon were to hold a referendum without the approval of Westminster – by no means an unthinkable eventuality.

In fact, her case would be much weaker than that of the Catalan government since there has already been one legal referendum in Scotland in 2014, which was said by the SNP leader Alex Salmond at the time to be the last for a generation.

Even so, it is inconceivable that a new unofficial referendum in Scotland would be met by the authorities in Westminster with police wielding batons and firing rubber bullets. Such a wild over-reaction would inevitably give a boost to Scottish nationalism – as, I have no doubt, the cause of Catalan nationalism will have benefited from Sunday’s onslaught.

The truth is that the Spanish state has a very restricted conception of democracy. We should know that already from its desire to shoehorn Gibraltar into Spain despite 99 per cent of its citizens having voted in a 2002 referendum to remain British.

God alone knows what will happen now in Catalonia. Unless the Spanish government agrees to an official referendum – an unlikely prospect – there will probably be deadlock. I am afraid there is also the possibility of more violence on both sides.

Justifying and supporting the Madrid government is the European Commission in all its absurdity, dreaming dreams of a union which the people of Europe do not want. It will do its utmost to ensure that Catalonia doesn’t interfere with its grandiose scheme.

Will Remainers look at Catalonia and reflect that we have a quieter and more civilised way of dealing with our differences in this country? I don’t know. What I do know is that every day I am ever more relieved that we are leaving this misguided club.


Full article

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4942684/STEPHEN-GLOVER-truth-national-identity.html#ixzz4uYWX4q7V

Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

 

92

View
comments

 

H.F.1332 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

*  *  *

WITH 193 COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD IN MIND

IN OUR HOUSE OF COMMONS AT WESTMINSTER IN OUR MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES CONSERVATIVE AND LABOUR THERE IS TO OUR KNOWLEDGE ONLY ONE LONG RECOGNISED OVERSEAS  LOBBY GROUP

 THAT FOR

ISRAEL

WE'VE HEARD OF THE

CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL

AND THE

LABOUR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL

BUT AT THIS MOST IMPORTANT TIME IN THE HISTORY

WE HAVE YET TO HEAR OF THE

CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS

 OF

 ENGLAND

AND THE

LABOUR FRIENDS

 OF

ENGLAND

 

WHY!

 

 

Will the Jews finally be freed from Khazarian mafia slavery as Israel is liberated?

*  *  *

JULY 16,2018

H.F.1625/4

 

*  *  *

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

Western civilization continues to implode as old paradigms cease to function

The old regime in the U.S. and Europe is collapsing in a way that is now becoming obvious even to the most brainwashed and illiterate Westerners.  This collapse ultimately stems from the social instability cause by extreme concentration of wealth in the hands of a very small clique of closely interbred oligarchs now known as the Khazarian mafia.  Fortunately, a revolution has begun that will soon liberate the West, and the rest of humanity, from these self-appointed, war-loving social engineers.

For now, though, there are multiple signs of a very dangerous and chaotic summer as the old system collapses.  In the U.S., the undeclared civil war that has been raging since the election of Donald Trump may lead to nuclear terror inside the U.S. by Khazarian mafiosi, say CIA and other sources.
http://www.tomheneghanbriefings.com/

If this happens, retaliation will wipe out the Khazarian strongholds in Israel, Switzerland, Italy, and elsewhere, Pentagon sources say.

One of many signs of how open the warfare within the U.S. government has become came last weekend when Trump tweeted about the “Russian Witch Hunt,” noting that, “With all of the bias, lying, and hate by the investigators, people want the investigators investigated.  Much more will come out.”  This was followed within an hour by a tweet from former CIA head John Brennan saying, ““Your fear of exposure is palpable.  Your desperation even more so!” and calling for a coup d’état against Trump, something that in normal times would lead to his arrest for treason.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/john-brennan-in-ominous-tweet-to-pres-trump-calls-for-insurrection-by-cabinet-gop-leadership/

Then we have one of Canada’s leading news magazines openly and only half-jokingly calling for an invasion of the U.S. because “America has become a failed state.”
https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/the-case-for-invading-america/

We also have the head of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg, saying in a speech in London that, “It is not written in stone that the trans-Atlantic bond will survive forever.”
https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2018-06-21/nato-head-no-guarantee-trans-atlantic-alliance-will-survive#close-modal

We could go on and on pointing out signs of a major undeclared civil war in the West, but the media is so saturated with this that doing so would become redundantly repetitive again and again.

The reason for this extreme high tension is impeding military action on several fronts by both the U.S. and Russian armed forces that could depose several governments and change world maps, say Pentagon, CIA, FSB, and other sources.

Big military action is most likely in the Ukraine, Israel, and …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Rebirth of Manchuria plotted as Europe faces summer of discontent

Once again the world faces a long hot summer of discontent, with the major action likely to be in Europe and East Asia this year.  The EU is likely to experience regime change due to popular anger as warm weather brings in yet another massive wave of mostly male Muslim immigrants.  In the Far East, the summit meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean strongman Kim Jong-un has led to serious plotting to revive a Manchurian empire straddling from Mongolia to Northern China to Korea to Japan, according to multiple independent sources, including CIA and Japanese military intelligence.

Let’s start with the situation in Europe, where governments in Austria, Italy, Sweden, and elsewhere are waking up to the fact that the so-called refugee crisis is actually a Muslim invasion.  This is no exaggeration, since over 60% of the roughly five million refugees who have arrived in Europe since 2013 are men.  Put another way, an army of three million military-age Muslim men has invaded Europe by stealth means.  These statistics come from Eurostat via Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_migrant_crisis

This is not just a random occurrence, either.  The “refugees” are being handed false papers;  for example, Afghan and Pakistani men are being given travel expenses and allowances, as well as fake Syrian passports by the P2 Freemason self-appointed social engineers who are behind this crisis.  As we have mentioned before, we were told when we visited the P2 in Italy a few years ago that their plan was to force Islam and Christianity to fight each other in order to merge the two into a single one-world religion controlled by them.

This is the background to a series of news events that popped up last week as the warm weather began in earnest.  First of all, we have the new Italian government getting into a war of words with France after deciding to stop admitting boats filled with refugees.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/italy-france-tensions-spiral-over-rejected-migrant-ship-133857517.html

Then we have the government of Austria kicking out imams and mobilizing its border police as a wave of 80,000 migrants approaches its border.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-14/situation-critical-austria-conducts-border-defense-drills-expected-wave-80000

Also, as we mentioned last week, Sweden has mobilized its Home Guard for the first time in 40 years to deal with the lawless government no-go zones created inside Sweden by these mostly Muslim men.
https://www.rt.com/news/428953-sweden-home-guard-drills/

The crisis is likely to overthrow the two regimes—those of France and Germany—that are still going along with plans to increase the inflow of refugees.  Members of pro-“refugee” German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government are now saying she will be replaced “within a week” because of her refugee stance.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/975166/Angela-Merkel-Germany-Bundestag-EU-migration-crisis-Kai-Whittaker

The situation is expected to come to a head at the NATO Summit meeting scheduled for July 11 and 12, 2018.
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_155085.htm

Russian President Vladimir Putin will be meeting U.S. President Donald Trump around that time, according to Russian government sources.  This is definitely connected to the meeting in Finland on June 10th between top U.S. General Joseph Dunford and Russia’s Chief of the military’s General Staff, Gen. Valery Gerasimov, where they discussed “European security issues,” “Syria [Israel],” and other matters.
https://www.militarytimes.com/flashpoints/2018/06/10/top-us-general-and-russian-counterpart-hold-talks-in-finland/

Someone “in the know” and who is directly involved with the negotiations between Kim Jong-un, [Chinese President] Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, and Donald Trump said, “Watch Vladimir Putin carefully during the World Cup, especially his chess move right after…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

The Kim/Trump summit, the Rothschilds and the financial war are all linked

The summit meeting this week between U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean strongman Kim Jong-un was preceded by a tidal wave of high-level public and secret diplomacy, because this is no ordinary meeting, multiple sources agree.  The summit will not only discuss peace in the Korean Peninsula, but also the future of the financial system and thus the future of the world, according to North Korean, Pentagon, Illuminati, and other sources.

The public meetings this past weekend were the G7 (now G6 following the U.S. de facto withdrawal) summit meeting of Western leaders and a summit meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (a.k.a. the Eurasian Alliance).  The secret meetings were the Bilderberg meeting in Italy, and meetings between Asian royals and representatives of the White Dragon Society (WDS) held in Japan, according to Asian secret society sources.

The Bilderberg meeting was presided over by high-level financial fraudster Henry Kissinger and included, apparently for the first time, a representative of the Vatican, Cardinal Pietro Parolin.  The top of the agenda was “populism in Europe” …
http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/meeting_2018.html

… which means peasants with pitchforks rising against this satanic elite in the UK, in Italy, in Hungary and pretty much everywhere else in Europe.  As things are going, it will not be long before these child-killing mass murderers are dragged out of their houses and hung from the nearest lamppost, as famously predicted by George Bush Sr.

In fact, last week “the Bush cabal was decimated as its top loyalist and Carlyle founder Frank Carlucci met his maker,” Pentagon sources say.  They also note that the “Department of Justice Inspector General report comes out on June 14 as the number of sealed indictments exceeds 35,000 and the DOJ has added 300 prosecutors.”  Furthermore, “the Senate’s August recess was cancelled so Trump’s federal judges and other nominees can be confirmed,” they note.

A message was sent to the Bilderberg-founding Dutch royal family on June 7th, the day the meeting started when the sister of Queen Maxima, Ines Zorreguieta, was “found hanged in Argentina in a message to pedo royals,” Pentagon sources say.  This happened as 160 children were liberated from an Atlanta child trafficking operation, they noted.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/07/dutch-queens-sister-found-dead-at-home-in-buenos-aires

Also, in England riots broke out over the imprisonment of Tommy Robinson on charges of reporting about a mass pedophile trial.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-10/watch-chaos-erupts-tommy-robinson-protest-police-chased-down-street-1000s-rage

However, it was Sweden where the real action could be seen.  Here the government “mobilized its home guard and reserves to purge Muslim rapefugees,” Pentagon sources say.  Top U.S. General Joseph Dunford flew to Finland last week to meet his Russian and Finnish counterparts “to help the Swedes in their Trump moment,” the sources say.  Austria also kicked out a group of Salafist pseudo-Muslim radical preachers last week, prompting Turkish President Recep Erdogan to warn this would lead the world to “a war between the cross and the crescent.”
https://www.timesofisrael.com/erdogan-warns-austria-imam-crackdown-will-lead-to-holy-war/

Of course, the Rothschild public servants gathering at the G6 meeting in Canada last week did not mention any of this in their communiqué and instead rambled on about things like “gender” (something Mother Nature already figured out at the dawn of time).

The G6 also made it clear they want to keep their control of the world financial system via the fraudulent “CO2 causes global warming” scam by stating that “Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the European Union reaffirm their strong commitment to implement the Paris Agreement.”  Pope Francis also made it clear last week who his real boss was (hint: not God) by supporting this unscientific fraud whose real aim is to perpetuate financial control by Khazarian (Rothschild, etc.) bloodlines.

Trump made his true feelings about the G6 and the EU known in a meeting with Rothschild slave President Emmanual Macron:  Macron told him “Let’s work together, we both have a China problem,” and Trump responded, “the EU is worse than China.”
https://www.axios.com/donald-trump-emmanuel-macron-eu-worse-than-china-trade-tariffs-57f53e00-8b5c-4931-9d05-97ee0b510fd5.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=twsocialshare&utm_campaign=organic

This leads to the inside story of the summit meeting between Trump and Kim in Singapore this week, where the real topic of discussion will be deposing the Khazarian controllers of the G6 financial system, several sources concur.

The part of the Kim/Trump summit that involves the financial system concerns the rights to ownership of Manchu (Qing) dynasty gold, according to Manchu heir Zang Seungshick (張勝植) and one other Manchu royal who prefers to remain anonymous.

Both sources, who were unaware they were simultaneously contacting the WDS, provided documentation to show Manchu gold was put under the control of …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

2018-06-25

H.F.1588

 

*  *  *

 
 
[WHY THEY WISH TO DESTROY THE HUMAN RACE.]
 
 
guac77
guac77
 
Pedophiles
You are missing something very important. To be a pedophile enjoy and want it, one must have a different kind of soul. I call it a low soul and in Earth’s case it’s a Reptilian soul, but it could be a soul from an Insect-person or from a Spider-person,
they all have low souls and low souls do not have empathy for others as well.
Long ago about about 18,000 years ago Draconian Reptilian geneticists came to Earth and created Humans that had their soul instead of a Human soul and made
about 25 of them. They look the same as us, but have a Reptilian soul. When a female with a Reptilian soul has children, the children will get the same soul as her a Reptilian soul, regardless whether the father has a Human soul or a Reptilian soul. They soon
multiplied and their was many of them, they were appointed to leadership positions, kings, queens, high priests and other important positions.
Since they don’t have empathy for others, they are very prone to evil. When they
rape children, especially before puberty they receive a very pleasurable energy and that is why they do it and why people with Human souls seldom do it, since they don’t get this energy.
Today I’m told there are about 1,010,000 of these people with Reptilian souls and they are in most of all the leadership positions. They are high up in and above 70% of the countries governments. They are the CEOs of all the big corporations, and control
Industry, Religions, Media, Finance, Entertainment etc. and have about 80% of the money on Earth. Since they control law enforcement they are kind of above the law. They are most of the high judges and thus control the courts in their favor. This is
why they aren’t getting arrested and put in prison.
They can tell each other apart from people with Human souls, while the people with Human souls don’t know what is going on, but I have figured it out, with my God given ability to read souls as my website is https://www.icheckyoursoul.com/ .
 
 
 
guac77
guac77
 
I was looking over the Bilderberg meeting and taking readings. What I found out was that 100% of the participants have a Reptilian soul and 100% of the police guarding it have Reptilian souls as well. I guess they had some leaks in the past and want to plug them up. They are going into high gear, since they are being threatened and there are more of them than ever before. I’m told they are cranking out clones with Reptilian souls in several underground military bases, upping their numbers, while trying to reduce the numbers of Humans, thus raising their very small percentage. Please help me raise awareness of people with Reptilian souls trying to control the world, by talking about it with your friends.
The sun’s rays most certainly cause Planetary Ascension. The brown dwarf star is in many ancient writings and when it gets close, it’s gravity causes Earthquakes, Volcanoes to erupt and the Earthquakes if in or near the ocean or large lakes and seas cause tsunamis. It is getting close and causing extra Earthquakes and many volcanoes to erupt, much more than normal right now. The brown dwarf star and Planetary Ascension are separate and unrelated events, they just happen to both be in a similar time frame, but of course this was planned by God. When the brown dwarf star came in ancient times and wrecked the Earth and the other planets, there was no chance of Planetary Ascension, because we weren’t finishing the 3rd cycle at that time. If Humanity and the other 3 soul groups, that are native to our solar system are positive enough, Planetary Ascension will happen first, putting our solar system in the 2nd realm, 4th density, the 5th dimension, where the brown dwarf star doesn’t exist, saving the Earth and the other planets from further destruction. https://www.icheckyoursoul.com/
 
[WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT OUR ALMOST FUTILE ATTEMPTS TO LEAVE THE EU IF AS STATED ABOVE 100% OF THE PARTICIPANTS HAVE REPTILIAN SOULS WHO WISH TO MURDER THE HUMAN RACE.  ]

https://www.google.com/search?q=HOW+TO+DETECT+A+REPTILIAN+SOUL+FROM+A+HUMAN+SOUL&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GGIT_en-GB&gws_rd=ssl

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JUNE 11,2018

H.F.1588/1

*  *  *

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Will the Jews finally be freed from Khazarian mafia slavery as Israel is liberated?

The world is headed for a new age, not a New World Order.  As a part of this, the Jewish people—high-level slaves of satan-worshipping Khazarian gangsters—are about to be freed from thousands of years of Babylonian slavery.  That is why the rogue state of Israel is now under full martial law as the Khazarian-controlled government there faces an ultimatum to surrender and free their Jewish and Arab hostages, according to Russian FSB and Pentagon sources.

https://www.debka.com/israel-announces-nationwide-military-drills-amid-war-preparedness-on-northern-and-gaza-fronts/

A clear sign that the Jewish people are finally waking up came last week when Jewish human rights groups petitioned their government to stop arming neo-Nazis.  Many are waking up now to the fact that Nazism and Zionism are two sides of the same coin.  These are really the people whom Revelation 2:9 in the Bible refers to as “those who falsely claim to be Jews, but are in fact a synagogue of Satan.”

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/rights-groups-demand-israel-stop-arming-neo-nazis-in-the-ukraine-1.6248727

Pentagon sources are also saying the British monarchy has formally surrendered to the U.S. military on behalf of the Khazarian-bloodline aristocratic families of Europe.  During U.S. President Donald Trump’s visit to the UK, “When Melania refused to curtsy, it appeared that the Queen has surrendered the British Empire and cabal to Trump, and to save face, Princes Charles and William did not show up to avoid the indignity,” a Pentagon source explains.

We can now say that it was the Europeans, including the British branch of the Rothschild family, who were behind the March 11, 2011 Fukushima tsunami and nuclear attack on Japan.  This is likely to come out once the arrests of European Khazarian cabalists start in earnest, according to White Dragon Society (WDS) sources.

However, MI6 sources say that while the Rothschilds were indeed involved in Fukushima (along with the P2 Agnelli family, a portion of the U.S. space command, and others), the situation is not so simple.  They say the Fukushima attack was a failed attempt to keep the owners of the G7 group in power.

So, they say, what is now really going on is that Western leaders are trying to come up with a united front in negotiations with Asian secret societies over the formation of a world government.  For that reason, the European royalty-dominated Committee of 300 (headed by Queen Elizabeth) is willing to cede the day-to-day management of the negotiations to the U.S. military government represented by Trump, the sources say.

In any case, the trouble at the NATO summit meeting last week between Trump and other NATO leaders was another sign that the Khazarian-controlled post-war order is collapsing.  Basically, Trump told the other leaders to pay more protection money, and they told him to buzz off.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-tells-nato-leaders-military-spending-4-percent-155939755.html

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-12/leaders-hold-unplanned-emergency-session-nato-update

Perhaps the most interesting thing to come out of this summit was the photograph at the link below.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/trump-nato-leaders-photo-reflects-tensions-2018-7

This photo shows all the NATO leaders looking one way while Trump looks the other.  This was almost certainly posed to send a message and shows that these “leaders,” including Trump, actually take orders from elsewhere.

It is obvious to any rational observer that NATO serves no useful function except to lobby for arms companies.  The whole structure of propaganda and lies portraying Russia as an aggressor and a threat to Europe is Khazarian double-speak, with no basis in fact.  The European countries, acting rationally, would rather spend their money on something other than military-industrial instruments of mass murder.  That is why a recent opinion poll showed that only 37% of Germans want the U.S. military to remain in their country.

What is really going on here is that an agreement has already been reached between the U.S. and Russia over NATO, the Ukraine, Syria, and Israel, according to Pentagon and FSB sources.  As this newsletter goes online, Trump will be meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss this, Pentagon sources confirm.

Regardless of what public announcements are made after the meeting, FSB and Pentagon sources say the U.S./Russian deal involves…

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

Arrests in August; 9/11 announcement in September; and Jubilee in October?

The good guys are continuing to win the secret battle for the planet earth in a big way, multiple sources confirm.  As things now stand, there will be a new wave of mass arrests in August, official government disclosure about 9/11 in September, and some sort of “major economic announcement in October,” Pentagon sources claim.

Behind the scenes, meetings involving the Knights of Malta, Russian FSB officials, Asian secret societies, and others are preparing the way for an economic announcement that could well be a genuine jubilee accompanied by a new financial system, according to sources involved in the negotiations.  Since the negotiations are ongoing, the details have yet to be hammered out, but a general consensus does exist, the sources say.

The key may be U.S. President Donald Trump’s imminent takeover of the Supreme Court, which would pave the way for war crimes trials and the legal recognition of a new financial system when it convenes in October, Pentagon sources say.

On that front, the “battle rages, as Trump’s super-elite stopped Bush operative Brett Kavanaugh and may succeed in getting a woman or an Indian [Native American] nominated,” the sources say.

The situation has reached the point where The New York Times has actually called for “Godfather” tactics and armed rebellion because Trump and his backers were poised to take over control of the Supreme Court.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/07/07/new-york-times-calls-godfather-tactics-stop-trumps-scotus-nominee/

Do not be surprised if military police soon occupy that treasonous paper’s offices.  Since they have consistently, and criminally, suppressed the truth about the murder of 3,000 New Yorkers on September 11, 2001, such a move would be long overdue.

We also have former U.S. Defense Secretary (and traitor) Leon Panetta saying European leaders “are scared to death” that U.S. troops will be pulled out of Europe.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/trump-us-troops-europe-leaders-scared-eu-panetta-germany-uk-france-baltic-a8437111.html?utm_source=reddit.com

They should be scared to death, since they are mostly war criminals who would have already been jailed and possibly even executed if the U.S. military were not protecting them.

The corporate press is also now following this newsletter (remember, you read it here first) in reporting that NATO and the post-war system are in mortal danger.  We have Bloomberg reporting that embattled German Chancellor Angela Merkel is resolved “to fight for the survival of post-World War II global institutions.”
http://www.bakersfield.com/ap/national/merkel-warns-of-worldwide-financial-crisis/article_2dff7b52-12a8-5a67-86b0-e4b9324607aa.html

We also have the Khazarian whore, court bard Bono warning hundreds of UN officials that the United Nations, the EU, NATO, and the Group of Seven are “under attack.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/prime-minister-honors-87-irish-un-peacekeepers-died-175547438.html

They are under attack, because their leadership has been plotting to murder 90% of humanity, and their incompetence is leading to the largest destruction of life on the planet since the dinosaurs were wiped out 65 million years ago.

Of course, as usual the Khazarian mafia is trying to murder, lie, and bribe in order to stay in power.  The latest casualty was Chinese HNA Group chairman Wang Jian, who news reports claim “fell to his death after posing for a photo in France,” last week.
https://www.rt.com/news/431745-hna-chairman-dead-france-wang-jian/

Mossad sources say it was “no accident” and that he was “taken out, as he was about to testify in a closed hearing regarding…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

The revolution continues as old regimes collapse in Mexico and the EU, plus secret space program disclosure

The criminal cabal that has been ruling the planet earth is being systematically removed from power, with the latest being regime change in Mexico and soon the EU.  Furthermore, the power struggle in Washington D.C. is definitely being won by the good guys.

Also, apparently some real disclosure is occurring about both the Roswell “UFO” incident and anti-gravity technology.  The two links below were sent to us by Japanese military intelligence and they say they are genuine (although this is not an area in which this writer has much expertise).  One appears to be a patent application for an anti-gravity craft, while the other claims to be a top-secret document stating that alien bodies and alien spacecraft really were recovered by the U.S. government.  We leave it to experts to determine if they are real.  If they are, though, it won’t be long before flying saucers appear in the showrooms.
http://d3adcc0j1hezoq.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Ultra-Top-Secret-MITD.pdf
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/7a/2e/a1/db08e8429a89a2/US20030209637A1.pdf

What is definitely real, though, is the ongoing revolution in the West.  Pentagon sources are now saying the number of sealed indictments in the U.S. is now up to 40,000 and that mass arrests are likely to start in the autumn.

For those who say the arrests will never happen, we can answer that many thousands have already been arrested or removed from power.  Over 50 congressmen and senators have resigned, and the top ranks of the Justice Department, State Department, FBI, and CIA have been thoroughly cleansed of Khazarian mob servants.  We have also seen the deaths of many of the top Khazarian mobsters, including David Rockefeller, Jacob de Rothschild, George Soros, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Bill Gates, etc.

What we are all waiting for now is to see some of the remaining top Khazarian mobsters like the Bushes, the Clintons, Barack Obama, and Benjamin Netanyahu (Mileikowsky) perp-walked in handcuffs in front of the world media.  That day is coming soon.

The Vatican is also continuing to clean up its act.  On that front, our Pentagon sources note that “While Aussie Cardinal George Pell is on trial for pedophilia, Bill Clinton’s Cardinal Ted McCarrick in D.C. is charged with rape of a minor.”
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/details-of-the-homosexual-molestation-charges-against-cardinal-mccarrick

Cardinal Pell’s case is important because he was Vatican minister of the economy, and as such, was in charge of the Vatican Bank and its secret bribe accounts held in the name of most so-called world “leaders.”  His removal is opening the way for a massive Vatican campaign in African and Latin America to fight poverty and environmental destruction.  Also, since Pell is from Australia, his removal means that vast stores of gold on the Island of Bougainville may soon be made available for the people of the planet earth, according to Vatican sources.

One of the main remaining Khazarian power centers, the BIS—the central bank of central banks—is now being told to return the stolen gold they have used to finance the so-called G7 and G20 groups of nations, according to members of Asian and Western secret societies.

This will become visible to the Western public during and after the NATO meeting scheduled for July 11th and 12th, where the biggest changes in European governance since World War 2 will be set into motion.  The Russian and Chinese governments as well as the Pentagon have decided to…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Western civilization continues to implode as old paradigms cease to function

The old regime in the U.S. and Europe is collapsing in a way that is now becoming obvious even to the most brainwashed and illiterate Westerners.  This collapse ultimately stems from the social instability cause by extreme concentration of wealth in the hands of a very small clique of closely interbred oligarchs now known as the Khazarian mafia.  Fortunately, a revolution has begun that will soon liberate the West, and the rest of humanity, from these self-appointed, war-loving social engineers.

For now, though, there are multiple signs of a very dangerous and chaotic summer as the old system collapses.  In the U.S., the undeclared civil war that has been raging since the election of Donald Trump may lead to nuclear terror inside the U.S. by Khazarian mafiosi, say CIA and other sources.
http://www.tomheneghanbriefings.com/

If this happens, retaliation will wipe out the Khazarian strongholds in Israel, Switzerland, Italy, and elsewhere, Pentagon sources say.

One of many signs of how open the warfare within the U.S. government has become came last weekend when Trump tweeted about the “Russian Witch Hunt,” noting that, “With all of the bias, lying, and hate by the investigators, people want the investigators investigated.  Much more will come out.”  This was followed within an hour by a tweet from former CIA head John Brennan saying, ““Your fear of exposure is palpable.  Your desperation even more so!” and calling for a coup d’état against Trump, something that in normal times would lead to his arrest for treason.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/john-brennan-in-ominous-tweet-to-pres-trump-calls-for-insurrection-by-cabinet-gop-leadership/

Then we have one of Canada’s leading news magazines openly and only half-jokingly calling for an invasion of the U.S. because “America has become a failed state.”
https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/the-case-for-invading-america/

We also have the head of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg, saying in a speech in London that, “It is not written in stone that the trans-Atlantic bond will survive forever.”
https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2018-06-21/nato-head-no-guarantee-trans-atlantic-alliance-will-survive#close-modal

We could go on and on pointing out signs of a major undeclared civil war in the West, but the media is so saturated with this that doing so would become redundantly repetitive again and again.

The reason for this extreme high tension is impending military action on several fronts by both the U.S. and Russian armed forces that could depose several governments and change world maps, say Pentagon, CIA, FSB, and other sources.

Big military action is most likely in the Ukraine, Israel, and …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

*

Will the Jews finally be freed from Khazarian mafia slavery as Israel is liberated?

 

 

JULY 16,2018

H.F.1625

 

*  *  *

 

HOLD YOUR NERVE!

BRITAIN.

 

On Independence Day

America's ambassador to the UK

 

believes Brexit WILL be a success.

 

 

On Independence Day, a rousing and timely-

CALL TO ARMS

from the U.S. Ambassador

by Robert Wood Johnson

AMERICA'S AMBASSADOR TO BRITAIN.

 

Robert 'Woody' Johnson (pictured with Liz Hurley last year) said Britain needs to 'hold its nerve' to make the most of Brexit

The path of least resistance is always the same: do nothing. It is easy to maintain the status quo. Choosing a new direction is much more difficult. It takes nerve. Change calls for courage, conviction and confidence.

Fortunately those qualities weren't lacking in the people who came to settle America.

They weren't afraid to take a risk. They sailed the high seas. They ventured out with their wagons across a vast and unknown continent.

Their can-do spirit built our country and made us who we are today. And there is no finer example of that spirit in action than the Declaration of Independence which we celebrate today. It was the boldest and bravest moment in the whole of American history.

Don't forget it wasn't an easy decision at the time.

Despite what the Declaration described as the 'long train of abuses and usurpations' they had been subjected to under the British, thousands and thousands of colonists wanted to remain.

They strongly opposed breaking the union — not only did they feel British, even more importantly, it was Britain who bought their goods.

And even those in favour of revolution were anxious about the risks involved. 

It is said that after signing the Declaration of Independence, the president of Congress, John Hancock, urged Congress to hang together.

Fellow signatory Benjamin Franklin responded with gallows humour: 'We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.'

The colonists' decision could have ended in disaster. But they had a unity of purpose and a clarity of vision that drove them forward.

The Declaration itself was a masterpiece. With its self-evident truth that all men are created equal, and its unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, they came up with the most ambitious and inspiring statement of political intent ever written.

They gave birth to a free nation that would become an industrial powerhouse, a military superpower and an intellectual and cultural giant.

The Revolutionary War was also the best thing that could have happened for the relationship between America and Britain.

Mr Johnson cited the Declaration of Independence, which is celebrated today – July 4

Ultimately it paved the way for our great alliance as independent nations. An alliance which, as Margaret Thatcher said, has done more for the defence and future of freedom than any other alliance in the world.

None of that would have happened if those men and women hadn't dared to take a risk. If they hadn't looked beyond the difficulties and dangers and uncertainties ahead.

That is exactly the attitude needed when, as stated in another section of the Declaration of Independence, 'in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another'.

And that is the attitude Britain needs now.

Brexit is no Revolutionary War, but it's no picnic either.

Breaking up is hard to do and make no mistake, this is as complicated as any negotiation gets. It's going to be a long journey to agree on the way forward. And, yes, it could be a difficult few years for Britain.

I'm not going to underestimate the challenges involved, especially in the short-term. But that doesn't mean it's not worth doing. I was never a Brexiteer or a Remainer. It wasn't for me to say. I don't support a hard Brexit and I don't support a soft one. That's not my call.

But I do support the British people and the decision you have taken. And I have never doubted for a moment that you are going to make it a success. The better I get to know this country, the more confident I've become.

I've travelled around the UK — from Belfast to Birmingham and Newport to Newcastle. I've spoken to some of the best scientists in the world, the most skilled and dedicated factory workers, the most exciting entrepreneurs. I've seen what this country can do and I've seen what this country can offer the world. 

 

 

President Trump understands Britain's potential better than anybody, Mr Johnson says

 

 

President Trump understands Britain's potential better than anybody. He has a deep, personal respect for this country and its history. He is proud of all the incredible things America and Britain have achieved together — not least to rally the West and save Europe from oppression in two World Wars and one Cold War.

But the President knows that the work of our Special Relationship is not done. There are still serious global threats which we cannot afford to underestimate — whether from China or Russia, Iran or North Korea. Our security, and the security of others, still depends upon our two nations standing together.

When President Trump visits the UK in just over a week, he will be visiting a country which is as important to America's future as it was to our past. Our prosperity and security are intertwined with yours.

You pay your way and shoulder your commitments to Europe's defence. Your soldiers are there side-by-side with ours in the fight against terrorism. Your businesses invest billions in America, and hire over a million American workers. And in almost every field of science and research, you'll find a Brit and American working in the laboratory together.

So the President will be coming here determined to work with the Prime Minister to make this crucial relationship even stronger.

Britain is quite simply an indispensable ally for the United States — as it is for many other countries, including, of course, the member states of the European Union. 

Even after Brexit, Britain will remain at the heart of the West — bound to the EU not by institution but the shared values of democracy and freedom.

And just as we saw with America and Britain, Brexit may appear to be a split at first, but it could be the foundation for a much stronger and more enduring friendship long-term.

What is clear is that Britain has a bright future ahead and a crucial role to play in the world. This isn't a time for the UK to panic. It isn't a time to fall into defeatism or to talk yourselves down. Take a leaf out of the book of America's revolutionary heroes. Hang together. This is a big moment in British history.

You have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to go in a different direction and define who you want to be and what you want to accomplish. That is an exciting opportunity. So hold your nerve Britain. This could be the start of something great.

I wish you all a happy

Independence Day.

 

 

Share or comment on this article:

 

america's ambassador to the UK believes Brexit

 WILL be a success

 

 

ADDITIONS

 

It's a muddle': Theresa May is warned not to revive

 

Unite piles pressure on Corbyn to soften his

 

America's ambassador to the UK believes Brexit WILL ... - Daily Mail

 

*  *  *

 

 

*  *  *

 

Europe's migration fiasco: Brussels plan to build EU

 

 

migrant centre descends into farce as leaders queue to say 'not in my back yard'

  • French President Emmanuel Macron said he would not host a 'control centre'
  • Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said his country would not accept one either
  • The proposal was part of a strategy to end the ongoing migration row 

A Brussels plan to build EU migrant detention centres descended into farce last night as European leaders lined up to refuse to host them.

The proposal was billed as an attempt to alleviate pressure on frontline Mediterranean countries, where the vast majority of migrants arrive.

But French president Emmanuel Macron said he would not host one of the ‘controlled centres’ and Austrian chancellor Sebastian Kurz mocked the prospect of one being built in his country.

EU leaders want to build migrant centres in north Africa to prevent them attempting to risk their lives trying to cross the Mediterranean 

The detention centre proposal was part of a strategy agreed by EU leaders on Thursday night with the aim of ending a brewing immigration row. But key aspects of the plan unravelled within hours of being agreed.

EU diplomats last night poured scorn on the migration deal. One said: ‘It has kept everybody happy, but parts of it are an obvious fudge.’

Another said: ‘This is a bit of paper that will never become reality. It is a mess and will discredit the EU because it is unworkable and everyone knows it is unworkable.’

None the less, the deal appeared to have brought Angela Merkel’s political career back from the brink of collapse. The embattled German chancellor heralded the agreement as an ‘important step’ after it was thrashed out over a marathon dinner in Brussels that ran into the early hours of yesterday morning.

But the proposal to build migrant detention centres across the EU where asylum requests would be fast-tracked sparked a war of words between the leaders. Mr Macron said the secure centres would be reserved for Mediterranean countries at the forefront of key migrant routes, such as Malta, Italy, Spain and Greece.

France is not a country of first arrival,’ he said. ‘Some want to push us to that and I refused it.’

But Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte rejected Mr Macron’s suggestion that the asylum centres would be hosted in countries such as Italy. He said: ‘Macron was tired. I deny what he said.’

Asked if he would host a migrant centre in Austria, Mr Kurz said: ‘Of course not... we are not a first arrivals country, unless people jump from parachutes.’

The centres will only be opened if EU member states agree to them and governments can refuse to host asylum seekers deemed in need of protection. The opt-outs are a concession to hardline member states such as Hungary and Poland.

The plan was signed off by leaders after heated discussions stirred up by Mr Conte, who threatened to scrap any agreement that failed to meet his demands.

After nine hours of talks on migration finished at 3am yesterday morning, he waved a copy of the agreement in the air and said: ‘Today Italy is no longer alone. We are satisfied.’ He said he had bullied other EU leaders a ‘little bit’.

But Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez, whose country has seen an increase in migrants, said the agreement could have gone ‘much further’.

The EU agreement backs the controversial creation of asylum centres in North African countries, which would see migrants who are rescued in the Mediterranean returned to a ‘disembarkation’ area to have their asylum claims assessed.

But in their joint conclusions from the meeting, the EU leaders acknowledged that the camps could create an unwanted ‘pull factor’ by attracting asylum seekers who could apply there.

The deal was welcomed by the CSU, sister party to Mrs Merkel’s CDU, which has threatened to close Germany’s borders in a move that she opposes. 

Flaws built into plan agreed at 3am 

Plan: The creation of migrant centres in EU countries

Flaw: Countries only have to agree to hold the camps on a ‘voluntary basis’, with EU leaders unlikely to sign up to the controversial proposals.

Relocation of migrants from the centres is also voluntary, leaving hard-line governments free to say no.

Plan: The creation of asylum centres in North African countries

Flaw: The camps will require huge investment in politically unstable countries, potentially stretching to billions of pounds.

They are designed as places to return those rescued at sea but EU leaders admit they could become a ‘pull factor’, meaning asylum seekers would flock to them. No country has come forward to host a centre.

Plan: Invest in Africa to stem the possibility of another migration surge

Flaw: The investment of another €500million (£440million) to the EU Trust for Africa is supported by EU leaders, but the region’s political landscape remains highly fragile. Diplomats said the focus on Africa appeared ‘colonial’.

Plan: Step up the return of economic migrants

Flaw: The ability for EU countries to return economic migrants is plagued by an array of legal complications and international rules. Current efforts on the issue have produced only meagre progress.

Plan: Curb movement of asylum seekers who have registered in the EU already

Flaw: Although not a significant issue at present, member states fear they would once again be able to stop the flow of migrants across borders if there is a repeat of the 2015 migration crisis.

 

ADDITIONS

Cyclists in tight shorts 'put fertility at risk' as so...

 

Smart meters to charge customers more during peak times...

 

 

 

H.F.1589

 

 

 

*  *  *

[UK THE MOST CROWDED COUNTRY IN EUROPE FOR DECADES]
 
 

    News for DAILY MAIL-3.8million EU migrants

     

     

     

     

     allowed to

     

     

     

     

     

    STAY HERE

     

     

     

    That's 600,000 more than previously expected ..It is

     

     

     

    because officials

     

     

     

     

     DO NOT KNOW HOW MANY EU MIGRANTS

     

     

    are

     

     

     

    LIVING HERE

     

     

     (

     

     

    EU migrants and their relatives are allowed to stay here

     

     

    after

     

     

     Brexit

     

     

    Nearly 4 million EU migrants

     

     

    will be allowed to

     

     

    live permanently in Britain ...

     

     

    They will be given the automatic right to settle here

     

     

    as long as they pay £65-about £10 less than the

     

     

     minimum cost of a

     

     

     UK passport...

     

     

    FULL ARTICLE

    by Ian Drury

    Home Affairs Editor

    About 52,300,000 results

     

      Fact Check: is the UK the most crowded country in Europe?

      theconversation.com/fact-check-is-the-uk-the-most-crowded-country-in-europe-38468
      9 Mar 2015 ... The UK is one of the most densely populated countries in Europe, but ... strong
      earnings growth in London and the south east over decades.

       

      UK to be EU's most populous country in just three decades, due to ...

      https://www.rt.com/uk/313929-uk-immigration-eurostat-germany/
      31 Aug 2015 ... If current immigration and birth rate patterns continue, the United Kingdom will
      overtake Germany to accommodate a population of over 75 ...

       

      England to be most crowded in Europe - Telegraph

      https://www.telegraph.co.uk/.../England-to-be-most-crowded-in-Europe.html
      5 May 2008 ... England to be most crowded country in Europe ... About 1.3 million immigrants
      have arrived in the past decade and ministers say the record ...

       

      Britain set to 'have the LARGEST population in Europe within ...

      https://www.express.co.uk/.../uk/.../uk-population-britain-largest-europe-germany-france-migration-poland-czech-republic
      11 Jul 2017 ... Projections suggest the UK could become the most populous in Europe by ... The
      ONS report revealed that eight east European countries had ...

       

      Fact Check: is the UK the most crowded country in Europe?

      https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/.../uk-immigration-crowded-ukip-1.447474
      9 Mar 2015 ... The UK is one of the most densely populated countries in Europe, but ... strong
      earnings growth in London and the south east over decades.

       

      England is officially Europe's most densely packed major country ...

      www.dailymail.co.uk/.../This-worryingly-crowded-isle-England-officially-Europes-densely-packed-country.html
      27 Dec 2013 ... England has become the most overcrowded major country in Europe. .... Only
      three decades from now, unless there is a significant tightening in ...

       

      UK population to hit 70 million in less than a decade | UK news | The ...

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk.../uk-population-to-hit-70-million-ons-in-less-than-a-decade
      3 Mar 2017 ... Country to become Europe's most populous nation by 2050 but Brexit could
      change projections, says ONS.

       

      UK population to overtake France's in a decade | News | The Times

      https://www.thetimes.co.uk/.../uk-population-to-overtake-france-in-a-decade-tgxjfnrw0
      9 Jul 2016 ... The UK is on course to overtake France to become the second most populous
      country in Europe within a decade, as migration drives ...

       

      UK population will surpass that of France in a decade, according to ...

      https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/uk-population-will-surpass-that-france-decade-according-eurostat-1569790
      11 Jul 2016 ... Britain's population could overtake France's, making it the second most populous
      country amongst European Union states within a decade, ...

       

      You'll never guess which is the most densely populated country in ...

      https://unherd.com/.../youll-never-guess-densely-populated-country-europe/
      19 Mar 2018 ... ... Luxembourg, what is the most densely populated nation in Europe? ... with 505
      people per square kilometre, followed by England on 426. ... with density, they're
      a time-tested way of sustaining it over decades and centuries.

       

    [WE ARE TOLD BY THE DAILY MAIL THAT 20MILLION UK WORKERS WILL LOSE THEIR

    JOBS TO ROBOTS

    WITHIN THE NEXT DECADE OR SO-SO WHY ARE WE NOT CUTTING MASS

    IMMIGRATION INSTEAD OF ENCOURAGING IT?]

H.F.1578

*  *  *

 

JUNE,-2018

LATEST! BREXIT NEWS!

 

[ IN JUNE 2018-DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU HAVE BEEN TRICKED BY MAY AND DAVIS?]

 

*Brexit: EU disasters retained

 

Brexit must reverse all the damage done by the EU; that’s obvious. But with the EU Withdrawal Bill, Theresa May and Labour aren’t planning to reverse any of it. This is what they should be doing:

 

By David Noakes

 

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

 

 

Britain was an independent nation for 3,500 years; we must get back to being one again. “No Deal” is the way to achieve that, by saving £10 billion a year in EU tariffs on the rest of the world by dropping out of the EU’s single market and customs union, Its costs us an additional £70 billion a year just to trade with the EU, so the sooner we leave the better.

 

 

The EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) puts up our food prices by 17% according to the Institute of Economic Affairs, and they recommend leaving it.

 

With “No Deal” we can have free trade with the rest of the world, the 93% that is outside the EU. All these negotiations will trap us into a damaging, continuing, costly relationship with the EU.

 

Repeal VAT: VAT is an EU tax, the most complicated to administer in all history. It costs both government and business billions to collect. It raises £100 billion in a £2,000 billion economy. The inland Revenue raises £550 billion in taxes, but that isn’t all of them. If the government is too lazy to cut out some of its vast waste to pay for VAT, it can offset it against the £300 billion we save below.

 

Repeal the disastrous 120,000 EU regulations. When we went into the EU in 1973, in 3,500 years Britain had accumulated just 2,000 regulations. You see all those old in-town deserted petrol stations? They were killed by just one EU regulation.

 

Regulation EU 9767 has closed over 10,000 British post offices. EU Taxation on drinks, ie, no tax in the supermarkets and huge tax in the pubs, has closed tens of thousands of pubs, as Wetherspoons Chairman Tim Martin points out. These regulations cost £100 billion a year to implement, according to the Better Regulation Commission, and that doesn’t count the damage they do to industry.

 

Repeal the over 3,000 EU laws on our statute books.

 

These 120,000 regulations and 3,000 laws have put hundreds of thousands of British businesses out of business.

 

Its frightening that David Davis and Theresa May have done the opposite, and think passing the EU Withdrawal Bill with a majority of 36, keeping the EU’s 120,000 regulations and 3,000 laws is a success. Its taking the majority of EU disasters with us.

 

Scores of Tory MP’s over the last 43 years have said how damaging these regulations are. But meekly they all voted for them.

 

Jeremy Corbyn failed to see the point, as usual. Labour voted against because the bill; like most bills these days, it has been drafted to be an affront to democracy. They didn’t even notice the 120,000 regulations.

 

Abolish the 8,500 EU mandated quangos, which cost us £210 billion a year, according to the Cabinet office. There's £310 billion a year saved, and we haven't mentioned the £11 billion annual fee for being in the EU.

 

Restrict immigration to thirty thousand a year as Britain did in the 1950’s. Australia, ten times our size, and a hundred other nations, still do today. Only the British Civil Service and government is incapable of keeping them out. The DWP deliberately encourages them to come here by being the only nation that gives even better benefits than the local British immediately on their arrival. And they have the advantage that Britain is an Island. The government still has their own, anti British agenda.

 

Theresa May is as big a disappointment as Tony Blair and David Cameron. She also still issues 800,000 social security numbers to immigrants to Britain every year. Perhaps that is why she did so badly in the election; immigration was why many voted

Theresa May is as big a disappointment as Tony Blair and David Cameron. She also still issues 800,000 social security numbers to immigrants to Britain every year. Perhaps that is why she did so badly in the election; immigration was why many voted for Brexit.

 

As an independent nation we must break the stranglehold big pharmaceutical corporations have on our health. 200,000 British die unnecessarily each year because big pharma control government health departments from Health Minister Jeremy Hunt MP downwards, and their own regulators like the MHRA and NICE. They license expensive drugs that kill, and deny the public inexpensive treatments that work. See www.mhracorrupt.st

 

We must abolish the prescription system, which denies thousands the treatment they need. and rely on pharmacists inside chemists to do the work. Involving a doctor is a destructive duplication. Spain and Portugal are amongst the nations that don’t have a prescription system.

 

We should close the pro-EU and anti British BBC, which is too corrupt to be reformed. It wastes £7 billion a year of our license fee, fosters paedophilia, and damages us. See www.abolishthebbc.co.uk

 

We need to pass an Act of Parliament prohibiting one person, one organisation or corporation from owning more than 10% of any large media company, or group.

 

The money laundering regulations and the Proceeds of Crime Act 2003 are a disgrace and override our human rights.  The banking compliance system should be made illegal. Each year agencies close thousands of innocent people's bank accounts, with no evidence, no judge, no jury, no justice. They never get their money back. And repeal the Restraint Order system of 2003 - where the government steals everything a person has, again with with no evidence, no judge, no jury, no justice.

 

A bill needs to be passed making it illegal for a bank to deny a person a bank account.

 

While we are about it, we should pass a law banning people who are members of secrets societies from all public offices and employment. That will get rid of the Bilderbergers, and 8 cabinet ministers, the core of freemasonry, and Common Purpose, who are in favour of the EU and do so much damage in other ways to us.

 

Abolish the EU Arrest Warrant, EAW. You can be hauled out of your British house at 3 am by British police and handed over to a prison cell in any EU nation, as is happening to me. It doesn’t matter that the intent of the the French, in my case, is utterly corrupt. There are 8 grounds for appeal, but the fact you are innocent is not one of them.

 

The French have 17,000 pre trial prisoners who they refuse to give bail to. In England they are innocent until proven guilty. In France they are guilty and incarcerated until proven innocent. The French prison system is so awful 25% of them attempt suicide every year. Hundreds of English are carted off to rot in European jails every year under the EAW.

 

We need to abolish the EU’s corpus juris, which puts government above the law; 1,500 British have died in police custody since it came into force in 1992, and the police cannot be prosecuted.

 

We need to make it illegal to put artificial intelligence into machines, or we will have an Arnold Schwarzeneggar Terminator future, as the scientist Stephen Hawking pointed out.

 

All this we can do as an independent nation.

 

The government took us in to the EU without the consent of the British people in 1972.  For 43 years we have been inside this costly, unelected, corrupt, bribing dictatorship, in breech of the British Constitution.

 

Declare that common law, and our written British Constitution remain the law of the land; they need to be amended to give them force, so politicians and the courts cannot ignore them again.

 

We should add the Swiss Referendum System to our Constitution, where all Bills Parliament passes should be voted on by the public once a year to decide if they should receive Royal Assent.

 

That will prevent Parliament ever overriding our wishes again. Its the reason Switzerland is prosperous, and isn't in the EU.

 

Just 10% of England’s economy is trade. You don’t need trade deals to trade with other nations. The EU is just 7% of the world. Its a 7% we can entirely do without.

 

The EU has organised it that Britain loses £70 billion a year trading with the EU, so we need to leave the Single Market and trade elsewhere.

 

But the Conservative and Labour parties seem to be determined for us to leave the EU with both hands tied behind our backs.

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

 

JUNE-2018

 

H.F.1585/1

*  *  *

www.eutruth.org.uk

['A MATTER OF FACT!'. 

A REMINDER TO REMAINERS WHO IN THEIR MILLIONS REFUSED TO PUT FREEDOM AND COUNTRY-CULTURE AND CONSTITUTION

FIRST!]

H.F.1585/1

*  *  *

 

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 SATURDAY JUNE 9,2018

...Could there be any more eloquent rebuke to Mrs May's critics than the public's confidence in her? And could there be any clearer warning to Tory rebels who threaten to humiliate her - and 17.4 million LEAVE VOTERS-by supporting the Lords' wreaking amendments to Brexit this week.

 Yet though Mrs May can draw comfort from the poll, she would do well to heed Boris Johnson. He will have struck a chord with millions when he argued that our negotiators could learn a thing or two from Donald Trump in their talks with the EU.

Indeed, with 64 per cent saying the Government  is handling BREXIT badly ministers need to display more courage and confidence in dealing with an obtuse and obstructive Brussels.

This country has massive leverage in the talks - as Audi's boss confirmed this week when he said he was desperate to retain free access to the UK market for his cars.

With treats if necessary, our team must spell out that Britain simply won't settle for being' locked in orbit around the EU' (to quote Mr Johnson's vivid phrase).

And if Eeyore Chancellor Philip Hammond can't understand this, then he should be replaced

BY SOMEONE WHO CAN.

[ The phrase TEAM appears to have a different interpretation with Mrs May as according to an entry in the NEW IMPERIAL REFERENCE DICTIONARY

'Team-Work-cooperation, pulling together, regard to success of the a whole rather than personal exploits.'

So Mrs May who chose

HER TEAM

is responsible for the negative progress over 2 years to date. If a football team manager chose players  who did not fit in as a team he would soon be looking for a job if he was not already with his termination notice in his hand.

AS we have explained on a number of occasions that had Churchill to retain PRO-GERMAN ministers in his CABINET in 1940 there is no doubt there would have been

 NO DUNKIRK-NO VICTORY IN THE AIR AND UNDER NAZI-GERMAN RULE.

And since Ist January 1993 we have been in HITLER'S planned so-called EUROPEAN UNION an UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-CORRUPT-GODLESS-NATION DESTROYING ENTITY which  in 2018 is being attacked from within by the growing numbers of patriots who are now longer prepared to remain servants but to recover their lost free-independent nation states. And how ENGLAND is judged in its BREXIT negotiations will not only decide OUR FUTURE but that of other captive nationalities who wish to enjoy the benefits that a FREE INDEPENDENT COUNTRY WILL BRING.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 SATURDAY JUNE 9,2018

*  *  *

 

[As we have learned in the article  H.F.1585 above the conditions agreed on the so-called WITHDRAWAL BILL are well short of what is in the minds of the Brexiteers who must be wondering what has happened to Mrs May's clarion call

'BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.'  24-6-18]

 

H.F.1565

 

*  *  *

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

 
 
PATRIOTIC

PATRIOTIC

WETHERSPOON DITCHES BOOZE FROM EU

BY HOLLY BLACK

DAILY MAIL

JUNE 14-2018

 
 

PUB chain WETHERSPOON

 is to

STOP SELLING WINE AND BEER

FROM

FRANCE and GERMANY

AHEAD OF

BREXIT

It will focus on offering more beverages from the UK and non EU producers across its 880 from JULY 9,2018.

Champagne and German wheat beers will be switched for English sparkling wine and craft beers in the run-up to leaving the EU.

But Kopparberg cider, which is currently made in Sweden, will stay stocked after the Swedish firm said it will switch production to the UK.

JD Wetherspoon chairman Tim Martin said:

'This is the start of a review of all our products in the next six to 24 months, with the object of making our business more competitive.'

He said tariffs imposed by the 'protectionist' EU were keeping prices high for UK consumers.

Some 2million people visit Wetherspoon pubs every week

The group sells more than 6million bottles of Kopparberg and 2million bottles of sparkling wine and prosecco every year, but fewer than 100,000 bottles of champagne are bought at its pubs.

In place of French fizz, the pubs will offer UK sparkling wine brands Denbies and Whitedowns as well as Australian Hardy wines. Meanwhile UK brewed wheat beers Blue Moon,Belguim White, Thornbridge Versa Weisse and mSA Braines Atlantic White will replace German brands such as Erdinger.

Russ Mould, investment director at saving firm AJ Bell, said

'Tim Martin's strong held political views are well known and you have to respect anyone's ability to stick to their principles so firmly.

'Excluding popular brands of drinks based on their country of origin seems an unusual move for a firm which you would think wants to be seen as inclusive and welcoming to customers of all views and beliefs, but Mr Martin knows his customers and has successfully built the firm by providing

VALUE FOR MONEY.

Mr Martin said Brexit would create big marking opportunities for UK and non-EU producers, which the pub group is keen to encourage.

The Wetherspoon chairman added: 'The products awe are introducing are at a lower prices than EU products they are replacing.

'We intend to honour existing contracts with EU suppliers some of which have several years to run, but we are starting to make the transition to

NON-EU TRADE

NOW.

 [CHEERS!-MR MARTIN]

*

JUNE 14-2018

 

    News for daily mail newspaper uk


    The Independent
    Daily Mail reversing Brexit stance 'would be editorial and commercial suicide', Dacre warns new editor
    The Independent - 22 hours ago
    It would be “editorial and commercial suicide" for the Daily Mail to reverse its pro-
    Brexit stance, the newspaper's editor Paul Dacre has ... He is known to be a keen
    supporter of Britain remaining part of the European Union.
 

JUNE 14,2018

THE DAILY MAIL

HAVING TAKEN UP THE BANNER OF ENGLISH FREEDOM BEFORE THE PEOPLE'S REFERENDUM RESULT IN JUNE 2016 COULD NOT DESERT THE FIELD OF COMBAT AND HAND OVER THAT BANNER TO OUR TREACHEROUS ENEMIES MONTHS BEFORE OUR EXPECTED EXIT FROM THE EU ON MARCH 29-2019. TO DO SO WOULD BE A GRAVE MISTAKE WHICH WOULD HAUNT THE DAILY MAIL AND THE FREE PRESS-THE FOURTH ESTATE OF THE REALM AT SUCH A CRITICAL AND MOMENTOUS MOMENT IN THE HISTORY OF ENGLAND. WE HOPE-WE EXPECT-THAT THE NEW EDITOR OF THE  DAILY MAIL WILL TAKE UP THE  PEOPLE'S NATIONAL BANNER OF A FREE NATION STATE TO ENSURE THAT THE BATTLE OF SORTS WHICH OVER  47 YEARS HAS BEEN FOUGHT, IS BROUGHT TO AN END ON INDEPENDENCE DAY-

MARCH 29, 2018.

*

 

 WE HOPE THAT MR MARTIN'S EXAMPLE WILL BE FOLLOWED BY MANY OTHERS WHO WANT THEIR COUNTRY BACK FROM HITLER'S PLANNED AND PLANTED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION WHICH IN REALITY IS AN ELITIST CESS-PIT OF GREED AND EVIL- A GODLESS - POWER HUNGRY

BEAST! 

IN ITS

TOWER OF BABEL

 

 ITS SWIFT DEMISE WILL BRING A FRESH BREATH OF LIFE TO THOSE WHO VALUE THEIR FREEDOM  COUNTRY -CUSTOM-CONSTITUTION.]

*

Unfortunately, the Godless European Union does have associations with 'The Beast' . It cannot be a coincidence that a massive Brussels-based computer called EURO NET, capable of storing all the personal data of the world's entire population, is nicknamed 'The Beast'.  The disturbing motif of the wanton women riding a modified beast from the Book of Revelations, Chapter 17, verse 3, is in widespread use throughout the EU -for instance, in wall paintings in the European Parliament at Strasbourg, on a German five deutschemark note pre-dating the political collective from 1948, on a British postage stamp dated 1984 commemorating the Second European Parliamentary 'Elections' , in the form of an unattractive sculpture located immediately outside the European Council building, on a German ECU coin dated 1992, and on a recent German telephone card.

And everywhere is to be seen EU's ubiquitous circle of 12 stars, which the ignorant comfort themselves by believing that they represent the crown of Mary (symbolism derived from Revelation, Chapter 12 , verse 1.)  In reality, the 12 stars are an attribute of the pagan 'Queen of Heaven', a name given to the mother of Nimrod (meaning, in Chaldean,' the horned one'), the builder and ruler of Babel.  the hideous new circular European Parliament building in Strasbourg is modelled upon Pieter Breughel's famous painting called 'The Tower of Babel', replicated in the Council of Europe's notorious poster. Symbology, which is much too large a subject to be dealt with adequately here, is a crucial component of the occult focus of all such man-orientated collectivist 'New World Social Order' constructions - the EU belong a conspicuous consumer of such neo-pagan symbolism.  But the occult underlying nature and motivation of the EUROPEAN UNION is not an issue that concerns the EU political and policy-making classes, which are measured by economics and ideology...

In any case, not a single politician belonging to or supporting successive British Conservative Government nor (much less surprisingly) the fellow travelling British Fabian Socialist Government (which, given its political orientation, shares the objectives of Lenin's World Revolution but proceeds towards these objectives by stealth, just like the European Union Collective itself...

 

PART 2

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 A PATRIOT AND MAN OF TRUTH.

 

 
earches related to DEATH OF CHRISTOPHER STORY

christopher story books

christopher's story

christopher story disappearance

christopher story new castle

christopher story youtube

christopher story eu corruption

christopher story the eu our enemy

christopher story website

 

PDF] 

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

exopolitics.blogs.com/files/eu-collective.pdf

 

 

Christopher Story Assassination (Edward Harle working under the ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6A_VpB2u_o25 Apr 2011 - 15 min - Uploaded by usellcom
Prominent veteran financial journalist Edward Harle (working under the pen name Christopher ...

H.F.974/1

 

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

OCTOBER-2013

 

JANUARY 1-1973-MARCH 29,2019?

'JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED.'

 

GLADSTONE.

*

'The liberty of a people consists in being governed by laws which they have made themselves, under whatsoever form it be of government; the liberty of a private man is being master of his own time and actions, as far as may consist with the laws of God and his country.'

COWLEY.

*

  'The greatest glory of a free-born people is to transmit that freedom to their children.-

Havard.

*

The true danger is, when liberty is nibbled away, for expedients, and by parts.-

BURKE.

*

[This is what has transpired with our being in the EU since 1973 and is still happening while our extrication from captivity is being  sought under Mrs May's premiership today in June,2018.]

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JUNE 14,2018

 

H.F.1573

 
PETER OBORNE

ON POLITICS AND POWER

 

Why he could be the man who saves

BREXIT

 

 

PETER OBORNE: Why Corbyn could be the man who ...

- Daily Mail

 

 

 

 

1993 he said the foundation of a European Central Bank under the Maastricht Treaty would 'undermine any social objective that any Labour Government in the United Kingdom — or any other Government — would wish to carry out'.

For all that, without Corbyn's intervention, the wrecking Remainers in the House of Lords could have scored a major victory in their bid to overturn Brexit.

I would argue that we must now see Jeremy Corbyn as part of a long tradition of Labour leaders who have fought against the European project. These include Hugh Gaitskell who, in a famous speech in 1962, warned against throwing away 'a thousand years of history' by joining the EEC.

Corbyn is also in the tradition of Labour's greatest ever prime minister, Clement Attlee, who said joining the Common Market would be a 'step backward', as well as Tony Benn — his personal hero — who campaigned alongside Enoch Powell against entry to the EEC in 1975.

When the history books come to be written, and the path to Brexit analysed, Jeremy Corbyn's role will be seen as crucial. Historians will record how he took on and defeated his powerful internal opposition, including his shadow Brexit secretary Keir Starmer and Tony Benn's son Hilary.

Not all Brexiteers may like Jeremy Corbyn. But this weekend, they have good reason to raise a toast of thanks to the grizzled Labour leader.

 
*  *  *

There is excitement among football fans this weekend after Russia opened the World Cup with a 5-0 win over Saudi Arabia. But we should remember how recently scandal engulfed the organisers, FIFA, when president Sepp Blatter resigned over allegations of corruption.

In that context, I can't help looking with suspicion at the decision to launch the tournament with a game between the host nation, Russia, and Saudi Arabia, by far the weakest team.

 

Only recently Sepp Blatter (pictured) resigned over allegations of corruption

Observers can justifiably ask whether it really was a random draw that resulted in such a favourable tie? Certainly it was very convenient for the organisers to start with a Russian victory and get the tournament off to a flying start.

It sits uneasily with recent remarks by disgraced former UEFA president Michel Platini, who admitted that he fixed the World Cup draw in 1998 so France would not meet Brazil until the final.

Platini said: 'We did not spend six years organising the World Cup not to do some shenanigans.'

I would love to feel confident that nothing untoward has happened in Russia. And I look forward to watching the host nation play against Brazil or Germany. But somehow, I don't think that will ever happen.

 
*  *  *

Britain's shame over Burma genocide

The International Development committee recently published a horrifying report on the massacre of Rohingya Muslims by the army of Myanmar (formerly Burma), noting that UN officials have described the killing as having the hallmarks of genocide.

There was one glaring omission from this report; the shameful failure on the part of the British government to act to prevent these war crimes and mass murder.

Troops started to sweep through Rohingya areas in August last year, murdering, raping and burning as they went. At Tula Toli, on which I reported for the Daily Mail, men and older women were shot dead while younger women were raped and then burned alive.

Yet just a week after this horrible set of events took place, the minister responsible for Burma, Mark Field, incredibly appeared to blame the Rohingya themselves.

He told MPs that he condemned attacks by Rohingya militants on Myanmar security forces, but made scant reference to the genocidal atrocities that were still being committed by the Burmese military.

 

UN officials have described the killing in Myanmar as having the hallmarks of genocide

Did Field know what was happening and ignore it? Or was he ignorant? If the latter, troubling questions now surround the role of Andrew Patrick, then British ambassador to Myanmar. At least Mr Field later had the decency to speak out against the violence.

At the time, our then British ambassador to the United Nations, Matthew Rycroft, had direct responsibility for UN Security Council policy towards Myanmar. To this day, no UN sanctions have been applied, and the Burmese army are allowed to carry on raping, looting and slaughtering without any serious rebuke from the international community, including Britain.

In an irony that no novelist would dare invent, Matthew Rycroft is now permanent secretary to the Department for International Development, meaning he is in charge of providing aid to clean up the mess that was at least partly a result of his negligence.

Our treatment of the Rohingya people, whose grandparents fought alongside British troops in the campaign against the Japanese at the end of World War II, will be seen as a dark period in our national history.

 
 

Theresa May has blundered badly by appointing Edward Argar as Justice Minister following last week's resignation of Phillip Lee as a protest against Brexit.

Mr Argar will be in charge of Britain's prisons. Yet this is the man who used to be head of public affairs in the UK and Europe for City outsourcing giant Serco, which runs five British prisons and was forced to repay the Government tens of millions of pounds in 2013 for overcharging on a criminal tagging contract.

Though there was no suggestion Mr Argar was involved in the wrongdoing, in these circumstances I believe it's wrong for him to do this job. He should be moved. 

H.F.1575

 

H.F.1574

 

A. N. WILSON: Are the young becoming more stupid? Sadly, the answer is Yes

465

View
comments

 

Are we becoming more stupid? The answer, sadly, is ‘yes’ according to new research.

In one of the most authoritative studies of its kind, scientists have found the IQ of young people has begun to fall, after rising steadily since the war. The decline started with the generation that reached adulthood in the Nineties, and has continued ever since.

Those who have been watching the moronic TV dating show Love Island will need little convincing that the young are less clever than they were.

Last week, one of the contestants, 22-year-old Hayley Hughes, shamelessly revealed her ignorance.

‘What do you think about Brexit?’ she was asked by a fellow contestant.

‘What’s that?’ she replied.

‘When we’re leaving the European Union,’ came the answer.

‘I seriously don’t have a clue what that is,’ she said.

Maybe it is asking a lot of the dunderheads on the show to have mastered the intricacies of Brexit. But one would hope they might at least have grasped the basics — Hayley, after all, has three A-levels.

Scientists have found the IQ of young people has begun to fall, after rising steadily since the war (stock image)

Brains

The legitimacy of IQ tests as a measure of intelligence has been questioned since they were developed by the French psychologist Alfred Binet in the early 1900s to identify students who might struggle at school. Binet warned of the tests’ limitations where creativity or emotional intelligence was concerned, although now, more than 100 years on, they have been refined and adapted, and are used by educationalists and scientists worldwide.

There is also, of course, the fact that you can define the word ‘clever’ in many ways.

It is easy for middle-aged people such as myself, who have been educated in one particular way, to disparage younger brains educated in another, and behave like old fools detecting ignorance and stupidity all around them.

What cannot be denied, however, is that it used to be assumed that every generation would become cleverer than its predecessor.

This was known as the Flynn effect, after the New Zealand researcher into intelligence, James Flynn, who, in 1984, proved that in each recent generation, intelligence had, in general, risen.

Now, new research demonstrates the trend has reversed. The question is, why?

One answer is down, it has to be said, to the lamentable failure of our state education system. Tragically, it is run by ideologues who abhor the notion of meritocracy and that there might be winners and losers. They’ve given up on discipline and intellectual rigour. Instead, they’ve adopted a child-centred philosophy, with a refusal to challenge pupils at its centre.

I remember when teachers were not there to read books on youngsters’ behalf; nor to tell them what to think. They were there to help pupils think, something entirely different.

A-levels, too, have been dumbed down.

A Loughborough University research project showed a grade B in Maths from the 2010s was equivalent to an E in the Sixties.

In 2016, more than a quarter of grades were A or A*, while in universities last year, 24 per cent were given Firsts, compared with 16 per cent five years earlier.

Syllabuses were also adapted to make things easier.

In history, for instance, a child is unlikely to learn more than a couple of ‘popular’ historical periods in their entire school career.

There is an obsessive emphasis on World War II and, occasionally, there will be a foray into the times of Henry VIII.

But ask a GCSE history pupil about the The Wars Of The Roses, Agincourt or Oliver Cromwell and you will be met with a total blank.

Compare this with the average schoolchild of two generations ago, who probably possessed a ruler with a list of all the Kings and Queens of England with their dates on the back, and who could put any historical event into some sort of overall picture.

To his credit, when Education Secretary, Michael Gove set out to stop the rot, introducing tougher GCSEs and A-levels. It was distressing to read this week that these tough new exams caused teenage candidates panic attacks.

But that is the price they have to pay if we are to stop our educational standards slipping relentlessly in global rankings — an OECD report in 2016, for instance, placed the UK 22nd out of 23 developed nations for numeracy.

Yet the fall in IQ cannot just be blamed on our state school system. A more pernicious factor undermining intelligence is our increasing reliance on computers.

We used to tell ourselves younger people may not know so much as older generations, but they had quicker wits and were brilliant with computers.

But herein lies the fundamental cause of the decline in modern intelligence.

Computers cannot think, but they can give us the illusion that they can do our thinking for us. How does a 14-year-old tackle an essay about the rainforests or the Holocaust?

Before the internet, they would have gone to a library and taken out a book. Their brain would have become fully engaged in composing that essay — scouring, sifting, absorbing pages of background information and processing it for relevant material.

Today’s student bypasses all the background material that places the subject in context. They simply Google ‘rainforest’ or ‘Holocaust’, then ‘cut and paste’ it into their essay.

 

Today’s student bypasses all the background material that places the subject in context (stock image)

Ability

Admittedly, some things, such as multiplication tables, cannot be downloaded, but increasingly teachers tolerate the use of calculators. Little wonder that research shows a diminishment of the capacity for basic mathematical reasoning — an ability which lies at the heart of much of our later intellectual development.

I witnessed this decline on that showcase of intelligence, the BBC TV quiz University Challenge. A few years ago I watched a final in which the truly brilliant leader of the winning team, Manchester University — an English Literature student — was flummoxed when asked about the odes of John Keats, who was until recently, possibly the best-known Romantic poet in the English language.

I cite this not to humiliate him — everyone has gaps in their knowledge — but to highlight the extent of the knowledge gap I am describing.

It’s often evident on University Challenge: young people with terrific scientific expertise suddenly showing ignorance of basic chemical elements; or those on history courses who are asked about past prime ministers or famous generals and who misplace the period they lived — not by a few decades, but by centuries.

What these howlers reveal is an inability to place bits of information into context — something that ought to be a vital function of intelligence.

Damaged

You hear a quotation from a poet. You do not know who wrote it, but you feel by intelligent instinct roughly when and where it was written.

That same intelligent instinct would apply to a scientific or historical fact. If you give an answer which is wildly out, you show your intelligence is pitted with holes; that, in the tiresome phrase, you have not learned ‘joined-up thinking’.

In the Nineties and the Noughties, when computer technology for popular use advanced by leaps and bounds, it was felt the world was becoming not just better-informed but cleverer. But, as we look back, we see something different happened.

The very clever — such as the University Challenge contestants — will always be very clever, even though we can now see these ‘black holes’ in their knowledge, caused by computers.

The average students, however, are being damaged for life by over-reliance on computer-acquired information, and by simple addiction to their electronic gadgets, which drive out the much more intellectually stimulating activity of reading books.

Until we put a brake on our lazy computer addiction, the decline of the intellect will be relentless. The levels of ignorance seen on Love Island will become more and more commonplace as we bring up young people who do not have the capacity to think to judge — or to know anything at all.

 

H.F.1571

 
 
 
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-JuLY-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-JuLY-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

SEPTEMBER 28-2016

 

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

EU QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

There are over 1000 Bulletins on the EU in our

BULLETIN FILE and EU FILE

 CLICK FOR TOP TOPICS

JUNE -2009

1]  EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU ?

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10]    VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]    100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT1          100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT2

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007] -NOT MUCH LUCK HERE!

33]    ALMOST 50% OF EU BUDGET SPENT ON CAP FATCATS

34] SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU

35] WHY BRITISH BUSINESS IS TURNING AGAINST THE EU

36] BRITISH CONSTITUTION-IDENTITY AND VALUES

37] MODERN DILEMA IN POLITICS-TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM.

38] LETTER FROM LORD KILMUIR TO TED HEATH WITH TRUE FACTS OF EU

39] INTERVIEW WITH RUSSIAN DISSIDENT WHO WARNED OF EU DICTATORSHIP

40]   The Truth About A Federal Europe - Part I

41]   Cost of EU to UK - £4,811 million in 2003= 40 District Hospitals equipped and staffed and funded.

42]  CAN THE 1972 ACCESSION TREATY TO THE EU BE REPEALED?

43]  Neil Kinnock in glover - but failed to stop the Shadow of graft over EU’s £68bn spending.

44]  Now the EU wants a single Foreign Office to replace Nation-States Embassies.

45]   How the EU takes over Nation-States.

46]  A Fabian Europhile of 1947 supported Independent Nation-States and the Rule of Law

47]       The New European Constitution - Part 1

48]  12-Point Summary of EU Constitution continued - Part 2

49]  The New European Constitution - Part 1

50]  An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.

51]   Britain takes over as biggest contributor to the EU Budget

52]  Neil Kinnock sacked honest Auditor because of refusal to sign off questionable EU Accounts.

53]  General De Gaulle acclaims British national institutions back in 1960.

54]  Brussels scams can let an MEP fiddle £60,000 a year.

55]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 1

56]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 2

57]  Europe and a conspiracy of Silence.

58]  Ninety-nine countries will soon have Free Trade with EU -without paying a cent to Brussels.

59]   Britain must leave the EU as UN show best area for expansion will be USA-Anglo.Saxon sphere.

60]  82 million Germans have no say as MP’s back EU Constitution.

61]  The EU big brother policy reaches back over two millennium.

62]   Europe: It’s the modern version of the white man’s burden.

63]   E U COUNCIL OF MINISTERS.

64]  EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.

65] German - Nazi - Geopolitical Centre established in Madrid in 1943 by Heinrich Himmler.

66]  What were the Dark Actors Playing Games, which the patriot Dr David Kelly referred?

67]  DEMOCRACY IS A DIALECTICAL FARCE BECAUSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES CALL THE SHOTS NOT SO-CALLED DEMOCRACIES.

68]  Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

69]  EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE.

70]  NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

71]   WHY NO TREATY LIMITING EU POWERS

72]   THE E.U.’S VERY OWN AESOPIAN LANGUAGE.

73]    WHAT IF ENGLAND HADN'T JOINED THE EU

74]   67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM EU

75]   WILL IRELAND SAVE EUROPE FROM ITSELF?

76]   WHY EU REGIONAL POLICY WILL DESTROY THE NATION STATE

77]   EMPIRES HAVE GONE AND MOST PEOPLE LIVE IN NATION STATES.

78 THE FINAL BETRAYAL- WHICH TOOK PLACE IN 2008 

79]  WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR-NOW BROWN-SHE DIDN'T - BUT SOLD US TO THE EU80] 

80]  Almost everything ,which is precious in our civilisation, has come from small States

81]  THE EU BIG BROTHER POLICY REACHES BACK OVER TWO MILLENNIUM

82]   THE EURO A DOOMED CURRENCY

83]  GERMANY AS STRONG MAN OF EUROPE

84]  BRITAIN AND EUROPE-THE CULTURE OF DECEIT

85]  NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

86]  A BETTER WAY FORWARD TOGETHER IN EUROPE-OUT OF THE EUROPEAN UNIOn

87]   A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

88]   TO CONTROL OUR COURTS AND BORDERS IS THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL EUROSCEPTIC STRATEGY.

89] BLACK OPERATIONS AND TRICKERY BIND UK TO EU
90]  HITLER-HAUSHOFER AND GEORGE KENNON-PENTAGON PLANS IDENTICAL
91]  Oh Boyo - Family on Brussels gravy train cost TAXPAYER £34 million and RISING!
92]   NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

93]    WHY DID THEY WANT BRITAIN IN EUROPE -  IN 1963

94]   Lies and The Betrayal of Britain
95]    Be Warned - The lies of 1975 still haunt us
96]   THe Strange Case of the Werner Report
97]   1972 EU Communities Act
98]   Further 200 Reasons why to Reject the Euro and E
99]  New elite threatens EU project admits Lib-Dem Peer
100]     The secretive Bilderberger Group will destroy True Democracy
101] BBC EUROPHILE BIAS-UPDATE-by LORD PEARSON

102]   How ‘a good European’ turned into a eurosceptic whistle-blower

103]   HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

104]    IF Gordon Brown forces this EU TREATY on us, you can kiss goodbye to DEMOCRACY  -HE DID!
105]   FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ARE THE FUTURE OF WORLD TRADE
106]   Twelve Mighty Reasons why you must say 'No' to the EU

107]        How much does it cost the UK in the EU

108]   THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL
109]   IF MONETARY UNION GOES-EUROPEAN PROJECT IS UNDERMINED
 
 
 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE-2009

H. F .11 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

 

A soft Brexit means no Brexit:

The truth is that the term ‘soft Brexit’ is endlessly and lazily repeated without it ever being properly examined. As soon as it is, it disintegrates into dust. Theresa May should call the bluff of these myopic Tory Remainers.

Don’t they realise their antics give comfort to Michel Barnier and Jean-Claude Juncker in Brussels? Mrs May has been weakened by losing her overall majority. Barnier even had the gall yesterday to tell the British Government to hurry up. How overjoyed the Eurocrats will be if they see her under attack by her own party.

And then what? A Tory split can only have one outcome — which is Jeremy Corbyn and his hard-Left clique ruling this country. We came far too close for comfort last week. It wouldn’t take much to put this unsavoury extremist in No 10.

A soft Brexit is no Brexit.

 It’s not an option for this country. It certainly isn’t worth splitting the Tory Party by fighting over it, and giving cheer to EU negotiators in Brussels.

And despite what Mr Hammond and others may claim, despite all the disappointments of last Thursday, there isn’t a shred of evidence that the British people have changed their minds about wanting

 BREXIT.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4601626/A-soft-Brexit-means-no-Brexit-STEPHEN-GLOVER.html#ixzz4kH5M4a1d
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

[A reminder to Philip Hammond]

INDEPENDENCE

'The word independence is united to ideas of dignity and virtue; the word dependence, to ideas of inferiority and corruption.'

J.BENTHAM (1748-1832) -Eng.philosopher.

[The main attraction for a politician is the power and profit within the bureaucracy of the EU-:Mandleson-Kinnock and Family and many-many others.]

*

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JUNE 13-2017

H.F.741

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM MARCH 2006

 

Quit Britain if you want Sharia Law says Trevor Phillips.

 *

Daily Mail

Monday, February 27, 2006

 By

 Steve Doughty

Social Affairs Correspondent

  

MUSLIMS WHO WANT TO LIVE UNDER ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS LAW

SHOULD LEAVE BRITAIN

 

-the head of the Race Equality Watchdog said yesterday.

 

The country must have one set of laws decided by Parliament and anyone who wants something different should ‘live somewhere else’, Trevor Phillips said.

 

The warning from the Chief of the Commission for Racial Equality followed a survey, which found that four out of ten British Muslims would like to see Shariah Law -Islamic religious law -enforced in districts where they are in a majority.

 

His remarks in an interview on ITV’s Jonathan Dibble programme suggest he believes that large numbers of Muslims are failing to integrate into British society.

 

Mr Phillips has run into controversy recently by rejecting the Left-wing doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

 

-and warning that, in some areas, Britain is ‘sleepwalking to segregation’.

 

Yesterday he said everyone who lives here should have a sense of Britishness.

 

He said of the idea of Shariah Law in Muslim-dominated communities:

 

‘I don’t think that conceivable.’

 

‘We have one set of laws.

 

They are decided by one group of people, members of Parliament and that’s the end of the story. If you want to have laws decided in another way, you have to live somewhere else.

 

Mr Phillips also said that ‘some minorities’ should accept that freedom expression meant that people had a right to give offence.

 

He said the right to give offence was ‘absolutely precious’ and added:

 

‘What some minorities have to accept is that there are certain central things we all agree about, which are about the way we treat each other -that we have an attachment to democracy, that we sort things out by voting not by violence and intimidation, that we tolerate things that we don’t like.

 

‘Short of people menacing and threatening each other, we have freedom of expression.

 

We allow people to offend each other.’

 

The same, he said, applied to Muslim preachers who should be free to give offence to gay pressure groups by condemning homosexuality.

 

‘One point of Britishness is that people can say what they like about the way we should live, however absurd, however unpopular it is.’

 

[Sir Ian Blair and his ilk we hope are taking in these precious words of wisdom and remain silent in the future in matters that do NOT concern them allowing more police time to catch the burglars -murderers and other violent criminals who have never had it so good when they see the police wasting their time on THOUGHT CRIMES which are no crimes at all]

To continue:

 

Mr Phillips said:

 

‘That’s why I believe that freedom of expression -including Muslim leaders’ right to say they think homosexuality is harmful -is absolutely precious.

 

‘Once we start to limit freedom of expression, the people who suffer most are minorities.’

 

Mr Phillips has managed to offend a number of former allies in the Labour Party and on the Left in recent months with his attack on the

 

MULTICULTURALISM

 

-that has underpinned Government thinking since Tony Blair came to power.

 

The CRE chief has said everyone in the country should speak English and that the development of cultural groups with their own languages and districts threatens to create a segregated society.

 

The Muslim Council of Britain said last night that Mr Phillips was wrong to think many Muslims wanted to see Sharia Law in this country.

 

Spokesman Inayat Bunglawala said:

 

‘I don’t believe Muslims are really calling for the implementation of Shariah Law. The findings of the poll highlights, in our opinion, the importance many attach to living by a code of conduct derived from Islamic teachings.’

 

He added:

 

‘British Muslims-like other communities -fully appreciate the value of

 

FREE SPEECH.’

 

* * *

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets]

MARCH/2006

*  *  *

ADDED MARCH 2018

[After 12 years with no government having taken any effective action to encourage the greater number of intransient MUSLIMS  to INTEGRATE which is estimated to be at least 60% , which is no doubt an underestimate ,because the Muslim population know from past 12 years experience that any government is afraid to act responsibly because they need the votes. Plain and Simple!  Even moderate Muslim clerics have for many years called for stronger and more effective ACTION! and they have called in vein.

We are now told that under new laws schools are to force integration by ensuring that there is a mixed race in classrooms.  All this could have been avoided if immigration had been controlled at the outset and only allowed  small numbers of those of opposing religions/customs to show that they would indeed integrate before allowing further inflows, rather than what we have experienced with over 3,000,000 /4,000,000 Muslims now amongst us? Even the Government admit they don't know the true figure.

The Jewish population is around 300,000 and this should have been the population bench mark for those of the Muslim Faith. Those who would not integrate would be asked TO LEAVE BRITAIN.  If this had been followed from the outset what a different  scenario we would have evidenced with a more settled population we would be witnessing today in  March 2018.

We have been informed recently that 16,000,000 people will lose their jobs to Robots. It beggars belief that this was not envisaged decades ago because being mindful of this fact should have been in mind of politicians. AS we have stated many years ago we live in a small island a quarter to a  third of countries like GERMANY and FRANCE. We hear that many of those who should be deported are able to avoid it by using the so-called HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION which in fact in many many instances is nothing of the sort-but a wonderful earner for the LEGAL PROFESSION. The sooner we ditch this monstrous legislation and bring in a BRITISH and more sensible and equitable BRITISH BILL of RIGHTS which distinguishes RIGHT! from WRONG! the sooner we will be able to ensure that RIGHT JUSTICE is DONE!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1503

 
 

 

 

 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

A MAN of VISION-A LEARNED PATRIOT for whom LONDON DOCKERS MARCHED on WESTMINSTER in his SUPPORT-HISTORY has VALIDATED his FEARS.

*

 

Words

Enoch would never have uttered

 

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail- Friday, November 9, 2007]

 

 

THERE is a long standing form of moral evasion popular among politicians - and some journalists too - which has always intrigued me , if only for its

IMPUDENCE

It involves Enoch Powell's so called 'river of blood' speech in 1968, whose recollection has forced the resignation of the Tory candidate for Halesowen and Rowley Regis. The speech itself, incidentally, was notable for understating the prospective immigrant population.

 

'Ah, yes, you see,' the cry of the political elite has long run (I read it again last week),

'It was that speech , that phrase, which made rational discussion of immigration impossible.'

Note the implication that these people had been indulging in a rational debate on immigration only to be thrown off course by Powell's hand-grenade.

Let me assure you with every fibre of my being that a rational discussion was just what leading politicians were avoiding.

THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

by both front benches

-which drove Powell to fury.

Far from making thoughtful debate impossible, his speech and reaction made it

VERY URGENT

As an admirer and friend of Powell I was myself dismayed by that sanguinary phrase. But the real shock lay in the public reaction.

Dockers from the East End marched on Westminster demanding  to protest at

TED HEATH

sacking Powell from the Shadow Cabinet.

Opinion polls showed massive backing for Powell, to say nothing of the largest politician's postbag on record, in which the overwhelming majority supported him.

THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

sprang from the fact that the problem had become so daunting. Effective action would have to be on a major scale , admit to previous failures and would risk, indeed ensure, denunciation from every pulpit in the land (lay and clerical)

It was easier for politicians and commentators, all secure in their leafy suburbs, to assure the public that the problem would be solved by

INTEGRATION

NOW, however, the genie was out of the bottle. So in the 1970 Tory manifesto Heath promised

'No further large scale permanent immigration'.

BUT

of course, there was.

 

The 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act

 

TOO LITTLE and TOO LATE

had allowed those already here or able to secure work vouchers to bring in their families and 'dependant relatives'.

THEY CAME IN SWARMS

 

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

UNCLES

and

SISTERS

and their

COUSINS

and their AUNTS.

They came from the sub-continent where birth certificates were far form common and anyone could claim a blood relationship. Money readily changed hands. So that Tories changed the law to say that only

Spouses

Fiances

and

Fiancees

would be allowed.

 

But by 1976, the level of intercontinental match-making had reached such a level the Foreign Office dispatched a senior official to the sub-continent to assess the

PROBLEM.

He observed that allowing in married and affianced partners would open up a whole new group of applicants -'subsequently entitling

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

and allegedly distressed

RELATIVES

to seek entry.

IT WOULD BE LIKE BAILING OUT THE OCEAN.

 

SO AN EFFORT was made to tighten up the rules but it was -how did you guess?

TOO LITTLE-TOO LATE

Since Heath's promise

TO CLOSE THE DOOR

more than

3,000,000

non-British immigrants have arrived

IN THIS COUNTRY

And traffic in spouses between such places such as

BRADFORD and BANGALORE

HAS CONTINUED APACE

 

Two other factors have long overhung any rational debate on

IMMIGRATION

Most obvious, in an echo of the Salem witchcraft trials, has been the tactic of pointing at someone and shrieking

'RACIST'

-the sin against the Holy Ghost - and even calling for

POLICE ACTION

Believe me , this accusation has long scared the wits out of

FLEET STREET EDITORS

-their legal departments

media commentators generally and politicians of every shade.

IT HAS BEEN CENSORSHIP BY ANOTHER NAME

-the public has been duly cowed.

A technical problem has added to this because the word

RACE

is SHORT -and EASY to FIT into a HEADLINE -while IMMIGRATION isn't. So arguments about IMMIGRATION were labelled in innumerable headlines as being about

'RACE'

The other problem which hindered meaningful debate was that immigrants had come to form a grouping of such

SIZE and IDENTITY

that politicians on all sides thought well worth wooing, indeed crawling to.

NOW

David Cameron has woken up, in intervals between sacking Tory front benchers and Tory candidates for 'racism' to the Government's vulnerability on

IMMIGRATION.

Ministers have trebled the number of work vouchers available to foreign workers over ten years to a level running at

150,000 a year

 

Cameron has no serious solution to

IMMIGRATION

but as the saying is, every bit helps.

 

The supreme irony of this week's fuss around Powell's 1968 speech is that recently had our supposedly internationalist Prime Minister promising

'BRITISH JOBS for BRITISH WORKERS.

Enoch would not have touched such a phrase with a bargepole.

*

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

[Under PR- Proportional Representation the Immigration levels would have been curtailed because the Government of the Day would feel obliged to take a stronger line in order to gather up the votes and back to power. But as we all know it has been this single-minded attitude of the tripartite in your

HOUSE OF COMMONS

to keep power within their grasp and to hell to any outsiders.

Most of the problems in our society over the past 40 years have occurred because of the determination of the party in power to take what they consider a more lenient line on policy whether it is

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

ABORTION

IMMIGRATION

and no doubt dozens of other matters which has resulted in absolute chaos in the above areas.

If they are able to claw in another small section of the community which will be ready voters they will change anything what ever the consequences to the people and the country.

We have been calling for the introduction of

PR in our PARLIAMENT

for many years as a number of bulletins on our website can testify but the very organisations that could achieve this necessary alteration -the numerous political organisations in our country appear not to be interested. And that is the PROBLEM

and until we change the system we shall see the constant over-regulation by the Government and the hair-brained schemes adopted by the so-called OPPOSITION which lays a path of problems in the future.

Of course if PR had been in place over the last four decades there would not have been the

WAR in IRAQ

or even

Mission Impossible in Afghanistan.

 

The Abortion Bill would only have passed if much greater safeguards had been put in place.

 

Immigration would have been freely discussed and sensible measures adopted to allow controlled entry ONLY and those who were prepared to INTEGRATE and NOT THREATEN the very existence of the COUNTRY that they were adopting.

 

Abolition of Capital Punishment Bill failed to honour the feelings in the country that if the Death Sentence was abolished that MURDER would mean a LIFE SENTENCE where the circumstances warrant it. Even before the abolition of the penalty over 50 per cent of murderers had their sentence commuted to life imprisonment and that didn't mean twelve or even three years or less today. The liberal establishment have much to answer for ,whether in believing that prisons should be five star hotels or that a fine that is never paid is the answer to the increased

MURDERS- GUN /KNIFE CRIME- BURGLARY- ROBBERY-THEFT-ASSAULT and whatever.

 

 

Our so-called Criminal Justice system would have been unable to treat prisoners as visitors and victims as criminals and there would have been Bobbies of the Beat- more prisons, and punishment to fit the crime.

Over the past 40 years the majority of your politicians in

YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS

 have been feathering their own nests to the point today in November 2007 there are many of them on a comfortable

£250,000 [at least] a year.

They fiddle their expenses-They lie about their expenditure-They lie about the true facts of the EU. In fact many of them lie about almost everything. They only work for a little over half a year .They have gold-plated pensions and they will be comfortable for the rest of their lives. As for what happens to their country as far as many of them are concerned our country had never existed.

Of course in such a bedlam there are a small group of men and women of

Honour and Integrity

who alas are ignored by their colleagues -some say they even detest them. Guilty secrets no doubt.

 

As for Europe the lies could not have been hidden if there had been eurosceptic parties at Westminster.  And the CONSPIRACY that has taken place since 1972 would not have been in place and our NATIONHOOD and COUNTRY threatened with extinction as will be the case in your Parliament in the early months of 2008.

*

THE ENEMY WITHIN IS YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT WHICH INTENDS TO SELL YOUR COUNTRY TO FOREIGN POWERS.

November-2007.

*

H.F.1594

 

HOME

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM? THAT IS YOUR CHOICE

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-June 27,2008]

DEMOCRACY and freedom. It is a fine sounding phrase-rarely off the lips of President Bush as he blunders around the Middle East.

Why do we readily accept that democracy and freedom are natural partners? There is scant historical evidence for it. Often it is a case of

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM: even DEMOCRACY versus FREEDOM.

Consider two examples.  the United States is the only country to have banned alcohol by public demand. Contrast this with Hong Kong. Until shortly before being handed back by

BRITAIN to BEIJING

 it had

NO DEMOCRACY

at all: It was ruled by a colonial governor. Yet enjoyed enviable freedom with one of the least intrusive governments -and flourished wonderfully.

Our own experience also has much to tell us.

BEING A DEMOCRACY HAS NOT PROMOTED PERSONAL LIBERTY.

QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

More than

3000

 NEW OFFENCES

have been created since 1997, and officialdom revels in nearly

300 POWERS OF ENTRY.

Much of this is due to the

EUROPEAN UNION

whose

DIRECTIVES

are rarely scrutinised, let alone debated , by our supposedly democratic representatives.

WHAT we may SAY, WRITE or DO, or whom WE EMPLOY has been increasingly limited. The Government has passed legislation which can make assisting your son's football team

AN OFFENCE.

Another side of our

'democracy'

demonstrates painfully how the public will is constantly flouted. Take the brazen example of voters being

PROMISED REFERENDUM

on

CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

resulting from the

LISBON TREATY

The unscrupulous machinery of government has been deployed to

FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC WILL.

I am not making a party point.

FOR OVER 40 YEARS, GOVERNMENTS OF BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN RESISTING AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC DEMAND FOR CURBS ON

IMMIGRATION.

especially from the

NEW COMMONWEALTH.

 While successive governments have made a show of meeting public demand, they have, quite consciously

REFUSED TO ADDRESS IT

throwing occasional tit-bits to the voters in the hope

THAT THIS WILL KEEP THEM QUIET.

Consider, also, the strong public demand for

CRIMINALS TO BE PROPERLY PUNISHED.

Successive governments, including Mrs Thatcher's have come under the sway of the

'PRISON REFORM'

people -with the result that

CRIMINALS RECEIVE VERY MODEST SENTENCES.

What is more, if they serve a sentence at all, it is in the softest conditions.

IF LYING ON YOUR BED AND WATCHING TV FOR A FEW MONTHS IS THE WORST THAT THE LAW WILL INFLICT

(and that's if you are even caught)

then

CRIME IS WORTH THE RISK

AND

PUBLIC OUTRAGE IS IGNORED.

The explanation is quite logical. Politicians are typically driven by

TWO THINGS.

THE FIRST is the PURSUIT OF POWER

the most exciting thing in the world, or even some say, the first.  If this urge is not there when they start their political careers

THEN IT SOON TAKES OVER.

THEIR SECOND MOTIVATION -to give our politicians their due - is the DESIRE FOR REFORM, IMPROVE the condition of the PEOPLE.

But the catch here is that most politicians

 THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE FAR BETTER THAN THEMSELVES.

THEY FORM AN ELITE

WHICH LISTENS TO

OTHER ELITES

Or perhaps, since the word elite sounds flattering, we should say

THEY FORM A CASTE.

 

Politicians do not wake each morning wondering whether they are meeting the public will.  They turn to the media to learn what is said about them in newspapers and on the radio by other members of the

NATIONAL ELITE

- the selectorate, the clattering classes, the scribblers, the intellectually fashionable, call them what you will.

 

For elites to be out of touch is not unusual, even inevitable. The desire to be 'in' with the 'right' people is common with politicians; their weakness is for approval (and fame).

Of course, there is one moment when public opinion cannot be ignored -and that is at an

ELECTION

As Rousseau observed, voters are truly free

ONLY

 ON

ELECTION DAY.

But , by then, all the issues are jumbled up, and the voter finds himself choosing between

TWO COMPLEX and CONFUSING MENUS.

And while it is clearly advantageous for a party to offer the public

WHAT IT WANTS, the fact that both main parties say MUCH THE SAME THING..

-and make similar insincere

PROMISES

makes a mockery of any claim to be driven by

PUBLIC WILL.

 

BUT  the ALTERNATIVE to our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM politicians say in horror, would be GOVERNMENT by REFERENDUMS. With 'horror' because it would take power from THEM and give it to THE PEOPLE.

BUT WHY NOT?

The Swiss have made a suburb success of it. Referendums are required on national and local issues if enough voters petition for them and they often do. As a result, the Federal Government, like  the local CANTON administrations, proceeds with CAUTION in case its plans are overturned by a PUBLIC VOTE. . .

To acknowledge that our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, which has developed over the centuries, NO LONGER WORKS -MAY BE PAINFUL. But if you put that to a REFERENDUM,

MOST VOTERS WOULD HEARTILY AGREE.

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

 *

HOME

[brought forward from June-2008

AUGUST-2008

*

[ 'IN JANUARY 2018 we can look back over 10 years and see that the situation with regard to many matters mentioned above has got progressively WORSE! Whether it is IMMIGRATION-POLICING-LAWS...The only GOOD NEWS is that we are only just over a year away from leaving the monstrous soon to be containment camp know as the EU SUPER-STATE a plan of ADOLF-HITLER in 1940 for GERMANY to dominate Europe in the PEACE .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[brought forward from June-2008

 

 
 

 

NEW AGE

OF

 INTOLERANCE

 

A.N. WILSON on the new dark age of intolerance: You must believe in gay marriage, you can't question abortion and as for transgender rights...

The great French writer Voltaire famously said: 'I disapprove of what you say and would defend to the death your right to say it'. In this way, he encapsulated what it meant to be an enlightened human being — someone prepared to consider all points of view.

But in recent years the principle of freedom of speech, sacred since Voltaire's 18th century, has been lost, and this is surely one of the most sinister features of our times. It is as if we are entering a new Dark Age of Intolerance.

The irony is that this intolerance has come about as a result of what were initially good intentions. One of the things which makes me happy as I grow older is the thought that during my lifetime we have all tried to become a kinder society.

When I was a boy and a young man, for example, racist jokes were the norm on radio and TV. Now they would be unthinkable. Mockery of homosexuals, and the equation of being gay with being limp-wristed and camp, were absolute norms of comedy when I was growing up. Now no longer.

Such jokes have gone the way of boarding-houses which used to put 'NO BLACKS. NO DOGS. NO IRISH in the window'. Obviously, all civilised people feel pleased by this.

But somehow those initial good intentions — to be kinder to and more tolerant of others — have morphed into a political correctness that has had the very opposite effect.

Two notorious recent examples of this concerned the treatment of a Christian baker in Northern Ireland, and some Christian bed and breakfast owners in Berkshire. The baker had not wanted to make a wedding cake for a gay couple who were getting married. The B&B owners had refused to let a gay couple share the same room in their establishment. In each case they were successfully sued for unlawful discrimination.

Now, a gay activist would no doubt say this was a good thing, arguing that the baker and bed and breakfast owners' behaviour was comparable to the racism of the past. Yet this is surely getting things wholly out of proportion.

The baker was not persecuting homosexuals, as Hitler did. He was not saying they should be put in prison, as all Home Secretaries in Britain did until the Sixties. He was merely saying that, as a Christian, he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman, and that two chaps tying the knot were doing something rather different, which is contrary to traditional Christian teaching.

Whatever you think about this matter, the Northern Irish baker and the B&B couple were merely holding on to Christian beliefs.

I don't happen to share their views myself, and think that if two people are rash enough to promise to live together for the rest of their lives, good luck to them, whether they are gay, straight, trans or anything else. But surely you can understand both sides of this dilemma, can't you?

Well, the answer, more and more in our intolerant society, is 'No'. My concern here is not about the rights and wrongs of gay marriage, transgender rights, our colonial history, or any of the other emotive issues that are subject to endless debate in the modern age.

It is about freedom of thought and speech; freedom to disagree in a liberal society; freedom to have thoughts which are different from the current orthodoxy.

What began as our very decent desire not to be nasty to those of a different ethnicity, or sexual proclivity, from ourselves, has turned into a world as intolerant as monkish Christianity in the days of the Dark Ages, when any freedom of thought is questioned.

Tim Farron, leader of the Lib Dems during the General Election, was asked repeatedly about his views on gay marriage. As a fairly old-fashioned Christian, he did not believe it was possible — marriage should be between a man and a woman.

As the leader of a modern political party, he knew that it would be political death to admit this. He was finally forced to resign.

This was a signal to the world that if you want to succeed in modern politics, it is simply not allowed to hold views which, until a very short time ago, were the consensus among the great majority of people in the Western world.

I use the words 'not allowed' advisedly. What is sinister about living in the new Dark Ages, however, is that it is by no means clear who is doing the allowing and not allowing. In Mao's China, it was obvious: thought crimes were ideas which contradicted the supreme leader.

In Britain today, however, it seems an army of self-appointed censors — from internet trolls to angry students, lobby groups, town hall officials, craven politicians and lawyers and Establishment figures, as well as a host of other sanctimonious and often bilious busy-bodies — have taken it upon themselves to police what we can and cannot think or say.

Not believing in abortion, like not believing in gay marriage, is now, unquestionably, a thought crime. It was hardly surprising that the Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg recently said he did not believe in abortion, because he is a man of conviction as well as a Roman Catholic, and this is the teaching of his Church. Yet his view was treated with incredulity and disdain by everyone from trolls and women's groups to the higher echelons of the political Establishment.

As in the case of abortion, debate is no longer allowed on transgender issues. There was a BBC2 Horizon Programme last Tuesday night called Being Transgender. The close-up shots of transgender surgery in a Californian hospital will not easily leave the mind.

We met a number of nice people who had decided for one reason or another that they were not the gender which they had once supposed. They were all undergoing some form of transformative medical treatment, either taking hormones or having surgery.

What made the programme strange as a piece of journalism was the fact that it did not contain one dissenting voice. Not one psychiatrist or doctor who said they doubted the wisdom of some of these procedures, especially in the very young.

Still less was there anyone like the redoubtable feminist and academic Dr Germaine Greer who once expressed her view that a man did not become a woman just because he had undergone transgender surgery — and was, as a result, decried from the rooftops with everything from petitions launched to stop her from speaking at university campuses to death threats.

Dr Greer had also been bold enough to say 'a great many women' shared her view, which is obviously true — a great many women do not think that transgender people have really changed sex. What has changed is that it is no longer permitted to say so.

A friend of mine who likes bathing in the women's pond on Hampstead Heath in London says that at least one person now uses the female changing rooms who is obviously in a stage of transition from man to woman, and is simply a hairy man wearing lipstick.

However uncomfortable this makes the women feel, they know that they cannot say anything.

There was an ugly incident lately at Hyde Park's Speakers' Corner, which used to be the place where anyone could go and stand on a soap-box and hold any opinion they liked.

Speakers' Corner was a symbol of British Freedom of Speech. As a schoolboy, I had a Jewish friend whose grandfather used to take us there to listen to people proclaiming that the earth was flat, preachers praising Hitler, Stalin, and others saying whatever they liked. It was the freedom to do so, said the old man who had escaped Hitler's Germany, which made the very air of Britain so refreshing to him.

What would he have thought had he witnessed the scene earlier this month at Speakers' Corner when a 60-year-old woman called Maria was smacked in the face, allegedly by a transgender fanatic, while listening to a talk on planned reforms to the Gender Recognition Act. Reforms which would allow men to 'self-identify' as female, and enter women's changing rooms or refuges unchallenged.

For Maria, as for the intimidated women of Hampstead swimming pool, and for Germaine Greer, it is by no means clear that transgender people have changed their sex.

Transgender activists have labelled women like Maria TERFS — Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists. When news of the assault on her reached the internet — ie instantaneously — the trolls began baying, like the bloodthirsty mob during the guillotine-executions of the French Revolution. 'Burn in a fire, TERF'. 'I want to f*** some TERFS up, they are no better than fascists'.

The use of the word 'fascist' is commonplace in our new Dark Age for anyone with whom you happen to disagree. You hear it all the time in the Brexit arguments which rage all around us and which I dread. As it happens, I voted Remain. But I do not regard Brexiteers as 'fascists', and many of their arguments — wanting to reclaim the power to make our own laws and control our own borders — are evidently sensible.

Yet I have lost count of the number of times I have heard Remainers say that Brexiteers are fascists. As a matter of historical fact, many of the keenest supporters of a united European superstate were actual fascists.

The only British politician who campaigned on the ticket of Europe A Nation during the Fifties was Sir Oswald Mosley who was leader of the British Union of Fascists. But then, today's PC censors don't let facts get in their way of bigotry.

Branding anyone you disagree with a fascist; hitting people in the face; tweeting and blogging abuse behind the cowardly anonymity of the internet — these are the ugly weapons used to stifle any sort of debate. And it is often in the very places where ideas should be exchanged and examined that the bigotry is at its worst: our universities.

This week on the Radio 4's Today programme, we heard James Caspian, a quietly-spoken, kindly psychotherapist, describing what has become a cause celebre at Bath Spa University.

He has been working for some years with people who for one reason or another have begun the process of gender-transition, and then come to regret it.

Caspian is evidently not a judgmental man. He wanted to write a thesis on this subject from a sympathetic and dispassionate point of view.

What makes people feel so uncomfortable with their own apparent gender that they wish to undergo painful and invasive surgery to change it? What makes people then come to reassess their first idea? These are surely legitimate questions about a subject many of us can't quite comprehend.

I have two friends who started out as men, and decided in mid-life that they were really women, or wanted to become women, which is what they have done. I do not really understand what has happened to them, even though they have tried to explain it to me.

Surely a man like James Caspian, who has worked with transgender men and women, should be encouraged by a university to explain this area of medicine or psychology?

But no. The university, having initially approved of his idea for a thesis, then turned down his application. 'The fundamental reason given was that it might cause criticism of the research on social media, and criticism of the research would be criticism of the university,' he told Radio 4 listeners. 'They also added it's better not to offend people.'

This is all of a piece with students at Oxford wanting to pull down the statue of 19th century imperialist Cecil Rhodes from his old college, Oriel, on the grounds that he was racist.

Rather than having a reasoned debate weighing the evils of racist colonialism against Rhodes's benevolence, the student at the forefront of the movement — who had actually accepted a £40,000 Rhodes scholarship funded by the fortune the colonialist gave to Oxford — wanted to pull down the statue.

This is the same attitude of mind as that which led monks in the Dark Ages to destroy the statues of pagan gods and goddesses, or the Taliban to do the same to age-old Buddhist artefacts.

Reason, debate, seeing more than one side to an argument, surely these are the foundations of all that has fashioned the great values of the West since the Enlightenment started in the 18th century with an explosion of new ideas in science, philosophy, literature, and modern rational thought that ushered in the Age of Reason.

Realising that human actions and ideas are often mixtures of good and bad — isn't this what it means to have a grown-up mind? Surely we should be allowed to discuss matters without being accused of thought crime?

In universities, as at Speakers' Corner and in the public at large, there used to be the robust sense that sticks and stones may break our bones but words can never hurt us. Now, the 'hurt-feelings' card is regularly played to stifle any debate.

Little by little, we are allowing the Dark Ages of intolerance to come again. We should not be letting this happen.

We should be able to say: 'We disapprove of your views — on Europe, on Transgender Issues, on Islam, on absolutely anything, but we defend to the death your right to express them'.


 

Full article

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4935418/A-N-WILSON-new-dark-age-intolerance.html#ixzz4uAFieZ6T
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[COMMENTS-HIGHLIGHTING - ARE OURS!]

 

SEPTEMBER 30-2017

H.F.1329

 
 
 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXITMEANS BREXIT".

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

JULY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018          JULY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

JULY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018          JULY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

JULY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018          JULY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

JULY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

JULY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.