PART 1-PART 2        (1994 - Official Website - JULY - NEW- HOME PAGE - 2018)      PART 3-PART 4

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

 

A MESSAGE FOR CHRISTMAS

AND EVERY DAY OF EVERY YEAR

 
A HISTORY LESSON OUR PARLIAMENT FAILS TO HEED!

[SYRIA WAS A PARTIAL  EXCEPTION BUT OUR TROOPS ARE ON THE GROUND AND DRONES ARE KILLING INNOCENTS AS WELL AS OTHERS.]

 

 

JOHN BRIGHT MP before the House of Commons in  March 31, 1854:

I recollect a passage of a distinguished French writer and statesman which bears strongly upon our present position: he says

 

' The country which can comprehend and act upon the lessons which God has given it in the past events of its history, is secure in the most imminent crisis of fate.'

 

 

'The past events of our history have taught me that the intervention of this country in European wars is not only unnecessary, but calamitous; that we rarely come out of such interventions having succeeded in the objects we fought for; that a debt of

£800,000,000 sterling

has been incurred by the policy which the noble Lord approves, apparently for no other reason than that it dates from the time of William III; [BANK  OF ENGLAND-ROTHCHILD-1694] and that, not debt alone had been incurred, but that we have left Europe at least as much in chains [as Cameron  and his successors have  seen in the Middle East with Muslim Countries] as before a single effort was made by us to rescue her from tyranny.  I believe, if this country, [ENGLAND], seventy years ago[1784], had adopted the principle of non-intervention in every case where her interests were NOT DIRECTLY and obviously assailed, that SHE would have been saved from much of the pauperism and brutal crimes by which our GOVERNMENT and PEOPLE have alike DISGRACED.  This country might have been a garden, every dwelling might have been  of marble, and every person who treads its soil might have been sufficiently EDUCATED.  We should indeed have had neither TRAFALGAR nor WATERLOO; [The next day ROTHCHILD owned ENGLAND] but we should have set the high example of a CHRISTIAN NATION, FREE IN ITS INSTITUTIONS, courteous and JUST in its conduct towards all FOREIGN STATES, and resting its POLICY on the unchangeable foundation of CHRISTIAN MORALITY.'

 

SPEECH OF JOHN BRIGHT MP

on March 31-1854

before the

HOUSE OF COMMONS

of

ENGLAND

 On the matter of WAR WITH RUSSIA in SUPPORT OF TURKEY

 

[All CAPS AND COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!-]

 THE ABOVE ARTICLE WAS PLACED ON OUR WEBSITE A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO BUT OUR BLOOD-THIRSTY PRIME MINISTERS SINCE HAVE FAILED TO HEED THE MESSAGE AS THEY HAVE NOT ON MANY OTHER IMPORTANT MATTERS. WHEN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS CAN BY A SMALL MAJORITY IMPLEMENT LAWS TO TAKE AWAY OUR INHERITED FREEDOM AND COUNTRY-THEN AS OLIVER CROMWELL SO EXPLICITLY COMMANDED:-

 

'It is not fit that you should sit here any longer!...you shall now give place to better men.'

 

SEPTEMBER 15,2015

 
 

DISCONNECTION OF OUR INTERNET IN 24 HOURS

We have received a garbled telephone message this morning informing us that our INTERNET CONNECTION will be CLOSED DOWN in 24 hours. After 23 years expecting this to happen we are not surprised but at least it will be an enforced REST after such a long campaign to see the return of OUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND from the strangling suffocating tentacles of Hitler's planned  so called EUROPEAN UNION-a NATION STATE DESTROYER and CURSE on the EUROPEAN PEOPLES who are now up in arms of sorts for the RETURN of THEIR FREE COUNTRY - CUSTOM and LAWS.

 

8.30 AM-TUESDAY, DECEMBER 11 ,2017

 

We Wish a Happy and Prosperous and Peaceful New Year

TO

ALL OUR VIEWERS

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ' ... May I ask you then to believe, as  I do most devoutly believe, that the moral law was not written for men alone in their individual character, but that it  was written as well for nations, and for nations great as this of which we are citizens.  If nations reject and deride that moral law, there is a penalty which will evitably follow.  It may not  in our lifetime; but, rely upon it, the great Italian is not a poet only, but a profit, when he says,-

'

'''The sword of heaven is not in haste to smite

Nor yet doth linger.'

 

We have experience, We have beacons, we have landmarks enough. We know what the past has cost us, we know how much and how far we have wandered, but we are not left without a guide.  It is true we have not, as an ancient people had, Urim and Thummin - those oraculous gems on Aaron's breast - from which to take counsel, but we have the unchangeable and eternal principles of the moral law to guide us, and only so far as we walk by that guidance can we be permanently a great nation, or our people a happy people.

 

JOHN BRIGHT MP

OCT.29,1858

Speech on Foreign Policy

BIRMINGHAM

Town Hall.

*   *   *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PARLIAMENT

THE NATION AND PARLIAMENT

by

EDMUND BURKE

1770-1784

#

PARLIAMENT A CONTROL

Parliament was indeed the great object of all these politics, the end at which they aimed, as well as the instrument by which they were to operate.  But, before Parliament could be made subservient to a system, by which it was to be degraded from the dignity of a national council, into a mere member of the Court, it must be greatly changed from its original character.

In speaking of this body, I have my eye chiefly on the House of Commons. I hope I shall be indulged in a few observations on the nature and character of that assembly; not with regard tio its legal form and power, but to its spirit, and to the purposes it meant to answer in the constitution.

The House of Commons are supposed originally to be no part of the standing Government of this country. It was considered as a control, issuing immediately from the people, and speedily to be resolved into the mass from whence it arose.  In this respect it was in the higher part of Government what juries are in the lower   The capacity of a magistrate being transitory, and that a citizen permanent, the latter capacity it was hoped would of course preponderate in all discussions, not only between the people and the standing authority of the Crown, but between the people and the fleeting authority of the House of Commons itself.  It was hoped that, being of a middle nature between subject and Government they would feel with a more tender and a nearer interest everything that concerned the people, than the other remoter and more permanent parts of the Legislature.

What ever alterations time and the necessary accommodation of business may have introduced, this character can never be sustained, unless the House of Commons shall be made to bear some stamp of the actual disposition of the people at large.  It would (among public misfortunes)  be an evil more natural and tolerable, that the House of Commons should be infected with every epidemical phrensy of the people, as this would indicate some consanguinity, some sympathy of nature with their constituents, than that they should in all cases be wholly untouched by the opinions and feelings of the people out of doors. By this want of sympathy they would cease to be a  House of Commons.  For it is not the derivation of the power of the House from the people, which makes it in a distinct sense their representative.  The King is the representative of the people; so are the Lords; so are the Judges.  They are all trustees for the people, as well as the Commons; because no power is given for the sole sake of the holder; and although Government certainly is an institution of Divine authority, yet its forms, and the persons who administer it, all originate from the people.

A popular origin cannot therefore be characteristical distinction of a popular representative.  This belongs equally in all parts of Government, and in all forms.  The virtue, spirit, and essence of a House of Commons consists in its being the express image of the feelings of the nation. [ But since the referendum result of June 23, 2016 this has not been so by many members of our House of Commons up to the present day in December, 2017.

It was not instituted to be a control upon the people, as of late it has been taught, by a doctrine of the most pernicious tendency [As in our day-in December,2017.

It was designed as a control for the people. Other institutions have been formed for the purpose of checking popular excesses; and they are, I apprehend, fully adequate to their object. If not, they ought to be made so.  The House of Commons, as it was never intended for the support of peace and subordination, is miserably appointed for that service; having no stronger weapon than its Mace, and no better officer than its Serjeant at Arms, which it can command of its own proper authority. A vigilant and jealous eye over executory and judicial magistracy; an anxious care of public money,  an openness, approaching towards  facility, to public complaint: These seem to be the true characteristics of a House of Commons...

[Which in our day this sound advice has been ignored for many, many, years.  WE have over many years suggested that MPs should only serve for one term and Ministers for 10 - which would curb those who have decided that it is a job for life. There would also be more independent minds and would also give many PATRIOTS an opportunity to SERVE THEIR COUNTRY AND COMMUNITY.]

 

POLITICS

 

'If ever this free people-if this government itself is ever utterly demoralised, it will come from this incessant human wriggle and struggle for office, which is a way to live without work.'

ABRAHAM LINCOLN

 

*

 

VIGILANCE!

 

'Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.'

JEFFERSON.Thomas.

 

*

'Better three hours too soon, than one minute too late.'

SHAKESPEARE

 

DECEMBER 18-2017

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

BRASS-PLATED HYPOCRITS

 

 

They posture as DEFENDERS of our NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY. But for years the BREXIT REBELS have let BRUSSELS

MAKE OUR LAWS 

Says a despairing QUENTIN LETTS

 

 

 

 

ENGLAND' CIVIL WAR, which began in 1642,was a fractious time in our history when the ruling elite  was over thrown by Oliver Cromwell's parliamentarians.

Cromwell and his supporters were fed up with being lorded around by an arrogant Crown which for years had spent and taxed without giving the ruled as say in their affairs.

Some 374 years later- on June 23, 2O16 -  we saw a similar insurrection.  This time the part of the bloated status qua was played by Parliament. Like the corrupt regime  of Charles 1, the Houses of Parliament had come to think that they could behave as they wished. They regarded criticism as lese-majeste.

When the Press exposed various parliamentary expenses fiddles, the Commons and Lords responded by trying to put

NEWSPAPERS OUT OF BUSINESS

Parliament's adversary in today's civil war, however, is not the Press. It is a great deal mightier than that.

IT IS THE

BRITISH PEOPLE

who on that June day last year voted in record numbers

TO LEAVE THE RULING CLASS'S

beloved

EUROPEAN UNION

Since then, as in 1642, the elite has been pushing back. The princelings of Westminster have been scheming hard to overturn the oily serfs

WHO VOTED LEAVE

On Wednesday, we saw the latest skirmish in this neuralgic (but so far thankfully non-violent0 conflict, Eleven Conservative MPs led by Dominic Grieve QC, collaborated with Jeremy Corbyn's Labour and other opposition parties to demand that they, rather than Theresa May, should approve or block

OUR WITHDRAWAL FROM THE

[COLLECTIVIST- CORRUPT- UNDEMOCRATIC-COSTLY-INSANE-DEMENTED-EUROPEAN UNION]

 The rebel Tories claimed to be acting out of the highest motivation but 11 of them were long-standing

EUROPHILES

and seven of them were disappointed ex-ministers.

[releasing their spite and anger.]

Take Oliver Heald, a middle-rater who held various portfolios in Opposition and Government and was even made 'Sir Oliver' before No 10 said he should make way for younger blood. What a waste of of a knighthood.

Or take Nicky Morgan, a thoroughly unimpressive former Cabinet minister who seems to boil with frustrated ambition- she once fancied herself a future leader of the Tory Party!. Or how about

Jonathan Djanogly?

He is a third division sort of talent but from a rich family and inherited John Major's vast majority in Huntingdon.

Mr Djanogly served briefly as an unremarkable junior minister at the start of the Cameron Government before being returned to the backbenches. Who is to know what sort of desire for vengeance bubbles through his veins?

How odd to think that HUNTINGDON was once

OLIVER CROMWELL'S SEAT.

I don't suppose the meritocratic lord protector would have thought much of squire Djanogly

On Wednesday there was a strong whiff of regal self-entitlement from

Mr Grieve

a former attorney general who-it is said-nurses an unresolved sense of grievance that he ,too, is no longer in government.

I will not ask you to imagine this long-chinned, humourless scrivener Grieve, in the should-length, curly hairdo favoured by the 17th century Stuart royal family, for that matter, will I give you nightmares by picturing mars may as a warded Cromwell in high collar and leather jerkin; but there are parallels.

For it is Mrs May who (however ineptly at times) is representing the put upon

COMMONERS OF ENGLAND WHO HAVE HAD

ENOUGH.

And it is Mr Grieve, who as he stamped his feet on Wednesday and said it was intolerable that he and his ilk should have their authority questioned, might so easily have been the

THE IMPERILLED ABSOLUTE MONARCH.

'The parliamentary process', he averred, 'is not just about the imposition of the will of the majority; it is the process by which we obtain consent for what the majority choose to do.'

 

I defy you to read that and not discern in it the lofty attitude of the over-intellectual lawyer saying

'we brainy few are the ones who run this country rather than you the lumpen majority'.

[WHAT GROSS ARROGANCE THE LAWYER HAS.]

For the record, let it be added that Mr Grieve is an ardent Francophile who is a member of France's Legion d'Honneur. Given the strength Brussel's Brexit negotiations Michel Barnier could gain from the trouble he has caused the May Government, Mr Grieve must surely be in line for an upgrade on his rank in the 'legion'.

[FOR SELLING OUT HIS OWN COUNTRY TO A FOREIGN POWER.

 

 

Not that there was anything particularly honourable about Wednesday's debate. It was an ill-tempered affair, pretty one-sided in that few Brexiteers bothered to take part.

You can hardly blame them, for those who did (such as North Essex's faultlessly polite Bernard Jenkin) were shouted down, hissed and sneered at by a baying gang that included

Chuka Umunna

Ben Bradshaw

Anna Soubry

and

Yvette Cooper

Mr Jenkin was even accused by Ms Cooper of

'Stalinism'

for suggesting that she was seeking to reverse Brexit'.

But is that not exactly what she and her little friends were up to? it is so obvious, I find it baffling the Remainers pretend otherwise.

One who has at least given up that pretence is New Labour's

Lord Adonis.

who after Wednesday's vote tweeted the remark

'First step towards defeat of Brexit

Miss Soubry then took to Twitter to make plain that she agreed with Adonis.

The Blairites and Tory Europhiles who took part in Wednesday's debate did so with repeated, mocking claims that they were merely doing what the supporters of Brexit had allegedly wanted: they were letting Parliament

'take back control'

of

BRITISH SOVEREIGNTY.

The way they said this, with curling lips and sarcasm, betrayed the fact that they were mocking the

LEAVE CAMPAIGN'S CELEBRATED 2016 slogan.

To these Remainers, politics is like chess: a game with cunning gambits and ingenious feints, where the art is to be at least five intellectual moves ahead of your opponent.

Voters  do not have the time or patience for such ironic drollery.

THEY JUST WANT THEIR POLITICIANS TO GET ON WITH

BREXIT.

And yet we should admit there is a Catch-22 here, Yes, the LEAVE VOTE was about restoring SOVEREIGNTY to the Westminster Parliament.

'Take back control'

was a brilliant slogan because it so perfectly captured the argument for leaving the

UNDEMOCRATIC-FOREIGN RUN EU

But the next few months present a slender window of time in which-before our departure from the EU is agreed - that same Parliament could turn round and say

'WE CHOOSE TO STAY IN THE EU.'

That is the paralysis, the ingenious little conceit, that Mr Grieve and his Blairite confreres seem to be aiming for, and it is a great pity that Mrs May's ill-fated snap election has given them the parliamentary numbers to make her life so difficult. Yet their posturing as

DEFENDERS  OF DEMOCRACY

WILL NOT WASH.

For two reasons.

The first is that the EU referendum was

NOT

a parliamentary election. It went beyond Westminster. In fact, it was a vote above and against Parliament by the People

-and it had been set up as that by MPs themselves' as a result of the electoral promise in 2015 by David Cameron.

The may claim that Parliament trumps a referendum but the fact that this referendum was so firmly created by Parliament gives last year's

LEAVE VOTE

the senior rank.

 

The second reason  we should dismiss the Remainers new-found  claims to believe in parliamentary sovereignty is  that for years these

GRIEVES and COOPER

and

UMNNAS

and

SOUBRYS

KEN CLARKES

happily sold our democratic birth-rite as time and time again they allowed the EU and its

JUSTICE SYSTEM

to override

OUR

PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY

and

BRITISH COURTS.

 

They may now be clasping parliamentary self-determination to their bosoms but where was that

NOBLE PRINCIPLE

when for decades, they let

BRUSSELS MAKE OUR LAWS?

I used to sit in the Press  gallery when those

EU EDICTS

were imposed.

Barely a a voice was raised against them.

Whoosh went billions of pounds in payments to the EU'

The money was signed off by

MINISTERIAL FIAT.

Yet now these same  frauds claim that  the Government can not use similar powers to get us out of of that

BRUSSELS QUICKSAND?

WHAT CANT.

These brass-plated hypocrites claim they that they are seeking to strengthen Parliament but all they do is to make plain Parliament's opposition to the

WILL OF THE PEOPLE

And by so doing they undermine dangerously

OUR TRUST

in the very HOUSE they occupy.

*  *  *

 

[Those Quislings named above should be shunned and shamed until they admit their grievous faults.

 

*

TREACHERY

 

'It is time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.'-

Shakespeare.

 

'Of all the vices to which human nature is subject, treachery is the most infamous and detestable, being compounded of fraud, cowardice, and revenge. The greatest wrongs will not justify it, as it destroys those principles of mutual confidence and security by which society can subsist.'-

L.M Stretch.

 

TREASON

 

 'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence.'-

BURKE,  Edmund

 

'Where trust is greatest, there treason is in its most horrid shape.'-

DRYDEN

 

 

 

 

[TREASON

 

The Oath taken by the Her Majesty the  Queen and Her Ministers has been broken as its contents will show.

 

 

 

Unfortunately ,the death penalty for TREASON was changed by warmonger Tony Blair late one night in the House of Commons  to LIFE IMPRISONMENT some years ago. No doubt it was to protect all who could be indicted for TREASON

 

 

http://eutruth.uk

We have been unable to get a link to the Daily Mail for this article at the present time so we will return shortly to continue this excellent and timely expose! by QUENTIN LETTS.]

[   3.05pm -Friday, December 15, 2017]

 

[ COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

DECEMBER 16,2017

 

 

H.F.1417

 

 

 
[A MOMENT OF TRUTH]

 

TRUMP

[President of the United States of America]

Yes, he's flawed and his tweets are asinine, but to stop Trump coming here would be a terrible act of self-harm,

writes ALEX BRUMMER

Many of Donald Trump’s opinions are objectionable, and his asinine bedtime tweets are not the ideal way to conduct politics, but the fact is that he is President of the country that is Britain’s greatest ally.

So, when the leader of the free world has been invited to make a visit to this country, whether it be a full state visit at the invitation of the Queen or a more scaled-down working trip, we as a nation have a duty to respect his status.

You don’t have to be a full-blooded believer in the ‘special relationship’ which binds Britain to America to recognise the profound importance of the U.S. to the health of our economy, national security and living standards.

 

Yet, predictably, we are witnessing a sanctimonious protest by Trump’s critics here on the Left who seem to be frothing at the mouth in anger and preparing ‘mass protests’ if and when he visits.

 

Donald Trump's views are objectionable and his asinine bedtime tweets are not the ideal way to conduct politics but the fact remains he is President of Britain's greatest ally

Typically, London mayor Sadiq Khan, ignoring the enormous contribution which the U.S. makes to the economy and safety of our capital city, pompously declares ‘an official visit here would not be welcome’.

True, Trump’s misogyny towards women, his sometimes manic tweets (particularly his recent retweet of anti-Islamic videos by the odious far-Right group Britain First) and his attacks on news organisations do not endear him to the liberal elites in the United States or our own weaker-minded politicians.

As someone who looked on with horror at the divisive and deadly race riots in Charlottesville in August, which Trump declined to condemn, I cannot say I view Trump with any equanimity. The so called alt-Right, with its apparent support of white nationalism, is wholly abhorrent.

But what can never be ignored is that, for all his faults, Trump is the elected President of the United States. Crucially, the significance of Britain’s relationship with the U.S. looms even larger as this country, in the run-up to Brexit, looks to strike new trade arrangements. 

It would be an act of self-harm, indeed insanity, to reject a visit by Trump because of a few of this narcissist’s ill-judged comments and indiscretions.

What is unsaid by those who would bar Trump is that the Americans are our kith and kin, who fought beside us in two world wars in defence of freedom. Their soldiers lie buried alongside our own in the killing fields of Normandy.

This sacred bond was recognised when Trump joined President Macron of France in July to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the U.S.’s entry into World War I.

 

London mayor Sadiq Khan is one of many British politicians who have been vocal in their criticism of President Trump. He said: 'An official visit here would not be welcome'

Much further back in history, the French may have allied with America when it secured independence from Britain, but our present ties with the U.S. are infinitely closer.

Among those voices trying to ban Trump are Lib Dem leader Sir Vince Cable, who has called him ‘an evil racist’. And during the recent debate in Westminster over Trump’s endorsement of Britain First, Commons Speaker John Bercow praised MPs for supporting ‘victims of racism and bigotry’.

These two men seem blind to America’s importance to our economy. The remaining 27 countries of the EU may, together, continue to be our biggest trading partner, but we should not ignore the fact that our largest single market is the United States.

(On a personal level, too, they seem to have forgotten Trump’s close personal links with this country. His mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, was brought up on the Scottish island of Lewis before emigrating to New York.)

Although we run a huge trade deficit with the EU, the most recent analysis of the UK’s business relationship with America shows we maintain a trade surplus — which means they send more custom our way than vice versa. At the heart of the UK’s ties to the U.S. are the financial institutions based in the City of London.

 

During the recent debate in Westminster over Trump's endorsement of Britain First, Commons Speaker John Bercow praised MPs for supporting 'victims of racism and bigotry' 

Brexit notwithstanding, almost all the major American banks — J.P. Morgan, Citibank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley etc — have their European headquarters in London and employ tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, across Britain.

Similarly, the internet giants Google, Apple and Amazon are investing heavily in Britain. Apple has chosen to locate in Battersea, south-west London, close to the new U.S. Embassy, which Americans want Trump to open officially on his visit.

Analysis by the Office for National Statistics shows that the U.S. is our biggest export partner, accounting for one-fifth of all the goods and services we sell overseas.

More to the point, Britain ran a trade surplus with the U.S. in every single year between 2005 and 2015, at an average of £28.1 billion. Over that ten-year period, America spent £280 billion more with UK companies than our firms spent in the U.S. Most recent data shows that our surplus with the U.S. is just short of £40 billion a year. 

Famously during his election campaign, Trump expressed huge discontent over what he perceived as unfair competition to American businesses caused by cheap imports from Mexico and China.

As he wrestles with those issues, it would be madness for those perennial malcontents of the British Left — who were happy to allow visits by totalitarian thugs such as Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe — to add to his diplomatic problems.

 

Among those voices trying to ban Trump are Lib Dem leader Sir Vince Cable, who has called him an 'evil racist'

Another key, yet less understood or discussed, aspect of the relationship between London and Washington, is security ties. Clearly visible to anyone travelling into Washington DC’s airport is the huge BAE (British Aerospace) emblem adorning a shining tower block, nestled among the big defence firms. Britain’s defence contractors, particularly BAE, are the only non-U.S. firms granted special status by the Pentagon to work on U.S. defence contracts.

As a result of this special relationship, BAE secured a £6 billion contract last week to sell 24 Typhoon fighter jets and missiles to Qatar in a deal that secures up to 5,000 jobs in the UK. That was only achieved thanks to the fast-track agreement with the Pentagon.

The truth is that there are much wider opportunities opening up as Asian democracies seek to protect themselves from threats by North Korea and guard themselves against Beijing’s ambitions in the South China Sea. 

For example, the U.S. Defence Department enlisted Britain’s help through BAE to update the advanced avionics on the U.S.’s ageing fleet of F-16 jets, including planes sold to South Korea. 

Meanwhile, naive and spittle-flecked critics of Trump — and, by extension, critics of the Special Relationship which was cemented more than 70 years ago by Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt to defeat the world’s darkest tyranny — prove they have no understanding of history.

Trump may be deeply flawed but he is far from the first U.S. President to breach the rules of civilised society. John F. Kennedy was a womaniser who unwisely slept with gangsters’ molls. Richard Nixon was a rabid anti-Semite who broke the law during Watergate. Bill Clinton had sexual relations with a young intern, Monica Lewinsky, in the Oval Office.

Donald Trump’s behaviour may be extreme and erratic. But when he comes to London and meets Theresa May, it is the office of President and the deep economic and security partnership that will be honoured — not simply the brash and boorish billionaire.

Picking a fight with the leader of the free world is potentially ruinous for Britain’s future at the very moment when we need desperately to underpin and strengthen our global ties.

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5173475/To-stop-Trumps-UK-visit-act-self-harm.html#ixzz519TSjOr6
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | Daily Mail on Facebook

*  *  *

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS -CAPS-TEXT-OUR OURS!]

 

DECEMBER 13,2017

H.F.1416 

*

 

 

COOKING UP A RUSE TO KEEP US MIRED IN THE EU GLUE PIT

QUENTIN LETTS sees remainers prolong the unease

Labour's Kate Hoey (Vauxhall) cut through the bluster to describe yesterday’s Commons debate as ‘lawyer versus lawyer’.

More accurately, however, it was ‘lawyer after lawyer’, for nearly all the MPs who spoke in the debate were Remainers.

Miss Hoey was using ‘lawyer’ in the disparaging sense. 

Here were puffed-up, prolix scriveners, fluffing out coat-tails as they sought to complicate, entangle, embugger and ensure that only they are the ones who run our country. 

 

Labour's Kate Hoey (Vauxhall) cut through the bluster to describe yesterday’s Commons debate as ‘lawyer versus lawyer’. The MP is pictured at the Brexit Conference in London last month 

 

More accurately, however, it was ‘lawyer after lawyer’, for nearly all the MPs who spoke in the debate were Remainers. Miss Hoey was using ‘lawyer’ in the disparaging sense. She is pictured showing her support for the Leave campaign ahead on the EU referendum, last year 

No others need apply. We’re the ruling class. We jurists are the ones who decide and you, the dirty-fingernailed electorate, can get stuffed.

Each time the Government seems to taken a substantial step towards getting us out of the Brussels gluepit, as happened with Mrs May’s December 8 agreement in Brussels, Remainers cook up another ruse to create a sense Brexit might yet be stopped. 

That was their purpose yesterday: To prolong the unease.

Some pretended to be consumed with anguish about ministers imposing laws without Parliament’s say.

They never protested much about that all those decades when we had our laws dictated by the EU.

 

Yvette Cooper, opening the hours of debate, wobbled her head and said the country ‘should trust Parliament to be mature and sensible’

Yvette Cooper (Lab, Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford), opening the hours of debate, wobbled her head and said the country ‘should trust Parliament to be mature and sensible’. 

Ha! She wanted the Commons given the power to delay Brexit, though only by ‘a couple of months’. 

The few Brexiteers in a sparsely attended Chamber did not believe her. Nigel Evans (Con, Ribble Valley) suggested she wanted Brexit stopped ‘for years’. Miss Cooper shook her head most forcefully and shot Mr Evans a warty stare.

Europhile lawyer Ken Clarke (Con, Rushcliffe) was at his most dismissive of the ‘scurrilous Right wing’.

He foghorned and reminisced, moving his forearm sideways like someone barging clutter off a table. He didn’t much like it when a Brexiteer, Yeovil’s Marcus Fysh, suggested Mr Clarke was misleading the House in some of his claims.

 

John Baron (on,Basildon 7 Billericay also told the old buffer ‘he does risk sounding very condescending’

By the time Mr Clarke sat down he was a touch magenta round the chops. Sir Oliver Letwin (Con, W Dorset), all conversational cornices and congenial gaseousness, said the ‘only logical possibility’ stemming from the Remainers’ manoeuvres was that they wanted to force Theresa May to ‘leave Brexit aside’.

Philip Davies (Con, Shipley) put it more bluntly. These Remoaners wanted ‘to overturn and frustrate’ last year’s EU referendum.

Mr Davies said it was a pity anti-Brexit egghead Dominic Grieve (Con, Beaconsfield) ‘hadn’t got the courage of his convictions to admit that’.

There would be a fearful backlash from the British public if the Grieves of this world had their way, predicted Mr Davies. 

Around Mr Grieve a doughnut of Europhile aesthetes had formed: Sarah Wollaston, veritably haloed by saintliness, Bob Neill, jumpy as a novice parachutist, serial rebel Heidi Allen, and lawyer Antoinette Sandbach, who would later wail to the Chair that some beastly person behind her was talking too loudly. 

Jacob Rees-Mogg (Con, NE Somerset) squinted at them from a safe distance. 

Ed Vaizey (Wantage and Didcot) was in orange socks and, like George Freeman (Mid Norfolk), wore the sort of horizontal-striped tie favoured by middle-aged groovers going through a crisis.

 

Mr Freeman nodded sagely as Mr Grieve said how horrible some Eurosceptics had been about him.

Mind you, Grieve himself took a pop at Iain Duncan Smith, who had apparently accused Mr Grieve of ‘grandstanding’. Ye gods. Cause for a duel on Hampstead Heath at the very least. Mr Grieve made plain he did not think IDS had been much cop when he was Tory Party leader.

On the Labour benches, Ben Bradshaw and Helen Goodman cackled as Mr Grieve worked himself into ever greater indignations. Anti-Brexit lawyer Anna Soubry (Con, pro-Brexit Broxtowe) made repeated interventions against the Government and each time ended by massaging her lips like a trumpeter. 

Mr Grieve, after accusing Eurosceptics of being ‘fixated on getting us out’, ended by comparing himself to Sir Winston Churchill.

 

 


Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5177425/QUENTIN-LETTS-sees-remainers-prolong-unease.html#ixzz51W6Pgwav
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on FACEBOOK

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ETC.-ARE OURS.]

H.F.1417/1

*

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 Home &

DEC-17

JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

PLEASE NOTE:- FROM DECEMBER 2017 WE HAVE INTRODUCED A HOME PAGE FOR CURRENT INFORMATION - APART FROM BULLETINS SINCE 2003

 

 

NOTICE!

 

We show content from other websites which is of GENERAL INTEREST and  of OTHERS we SUPPORT to ensure that should THEIR WEBSITE be GROUNDED we have at least some of THEIR CONTENT to  FILL THE GAP on THEIR BEHALF.  It takes up much TIME to offer THIS SERVICE  away from our own CAUSE ,but WHAT IS TIME! if the CONTENT is VITAL for immediate CIRCULATION?

 

DECEMBER 1-2017

 

 

[ A BETRAYAL AND  A

SURRENDER!

TO A

EUROPEAN COURT

AND PRINCIPLE.

 

 

'No deal is better than a bad deal.' ]

 

PM will confront Boris over Brexit before Christmas: Theresa May prepares for Cabinet showdown as Gove warns her hard won deal could be ripped up at the next election

  • Theresa May has overcome a Brexit obstacle - but must now deal with Brexiteers
  • She has arranged a Cabinet meeting for December 19 to discuss BREXIT outcome
  • PM now keen to challenge Boris 'with realities of the next stage of negotiations'
  • Michael Gove, meanwhile, has said the British people will have their say on deal 

Prime Minister Theresa May has overcome her biggest Brexit obstacle so far by winning a deal with Brussels on future trade negotiations - but now she must face the Brexiteers.

She has arranged a Cabinet meeting for December 19 so her ministers can discuss what Britain's final relationship with the EU will look like. 

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and Environment Secretary Michael Gove are among the leading Brexiteers she is now expected to confront. 

 
 

The PM and Jean-Claude Juncker were smiling as they shook hands for the cameras on the day the deal was agreed

 
 

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson (pictured left) and Environment Secretary Michael Gove (right) are among the leading Brexiteers she is now expected to confront

According to The Times, the prime minister has been 'buoyed' by her victory in securing a preliminary deal and is now keen to challenge Boris 'with the realities of the next stage of negotiations'.

The key concessions 

  • Britain must pay a 'divorce bill' of up to £39 billion under the terms of the withdrawal package
  • The European Court of Justice will oversee EU citizens' rights in the UK for eight years after Brexit
  • Three million EU citizens will be permitted to remain in the UK - and bring their families 
  • There will be no hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
  • The UK will stay in the single market and customs union until 2021 

It comes as Mr Gove explained yesterday that the public will have their say on the EU deal at the next general election - and stressed that Mrs May's deal might be changed by future governments. 

The Times also reports that the exact form of Britain's post-Brexit relationship with the EU will not be determined in the showdown Cabinet meeting, and that ministers will be permitted to put forward their own plans.

[BLACKMAIL!]

Mrs May, however, is said to believe that the reality of needing to gain access to EU markets will force hardline Brexiteers to soften their stance on regulatory compliance.

The environment secretary, one of the leaders of the Leave campaign, explained in The Telegraph that the UK will have 'full freedom to diverge' from the EU on the single market and customs union following the two-year post-Brexit transition. 

He also stressed that 'the British people will be in control' and, if they did not approve of a final Brexit deal, a future government will be allowed to 'diverge'.  

 

Prime Minister Theresa May and Brexit Secretary David Davis smiled alongside EU officials after securing a last-minute Brexit deal

 

Mrs May was pictured greeting EU President Jean-Claude Juncker after she arrived in Brussels just before 6am. Talks started almost immediately after

 

Brexit Secretary David Davis embraced EU President Juncker early on Friday just hours before the deal was struck

But Mr Gove - who alongside Boris has espoused a Brexit featuring freedom from EU regulation - also praised Mrs May's 'tenacity and skill' in the negotiation. 

 

Mrs May shook hands with the president of the European Council Donald Tusk before the meeting in Brussels yesterday

A senior official told The Telegraph that the 'real battle begins now' and that the 'heart and soul of Brexit is now at stake'.

Mr Gove added in his article that Britain will be free to spend more cash on the NHS and housing once the country has left the EU, as well as being at liberty to make trade deals abroad.

Mrs May celebrated yesterday after the European Commission cleared the way for negotiations on the future relationship after the UK's withdrawal from the EU.

Britain will pay a 'divorce bill' of up to £39 billion under the terms of a withdrawal package agreed with Brussels.

The breakthrough was hailed by Mrs May as 'a hard-won agreement in all our interests'.

Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker said it represented 'sufficient progress' for negotiations to move on to their second phase, subject to approval by leaders of the remaining 27 EU states at a summit on December 14-15.

In dramatic pre-dawn scenes, Mrs May and Brexit Secretary David Davis flew to Brussels to confirm with Mr Juncker over breakfast the text of a joint document setting out proposals on the key withdrawal issues of citizens' rights, the Irish border and Britain's exit bill.

But the scene was set for further wrangling, as European Council president Donald Tusk set out guidelines for the next phase of talks, covering the transition to a post-Brexit relationship, which envisage the UK staying in the single market and customs union and observing all EU laws for around two years after the official withdrawal date in March 2019.

He said only 'exploratory talks' on a free trade agreement could begin at this stage, with the EU's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier suggesting that 'real negotiations' on trade would get under way once a withdrawal treaty is finalised in October.

Mr Barnier also threw cold water on Mrs May's hopes for a 'deep and special' trading relationship with the EU.

He warned that her 'red lines' of taking the UK out of the single market, the customs union and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice left a free trade deal similar to Canada's as the only option open to Britain.

There was consternation among some Brexit-backers over provisions allowing the European Court of Justice a role in overseeing EU citizens' rights in the UK for eight years after Brexit.

However, Downing Street said they only expected around two or three cases a year to be referred voluntarily by UK judges to the Luxembourg court.

And a compromise on the Irish border - forged in intensive talks late on Thursday night after the Democratic Unionist Party blocked an earlier deal on Monday - states that if no trade deal is reached, the UK as a whole will maintain 'full alignment' with elements of the EU single market and customs union which support the economy of the island of Ireland and the Good Friday Agreement.

 

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson insisted the PM was determined to ensure the measure's 'compatibility with taking back control of our money, laws and borders'

 

Tory chief whip Julian Smith tweeted a photograph of Mrs May apparently briefing Mr Johnson on the developments last night 

Tory former Brexit minister David Jones warned this could 'severely handicap' Britain's ability to enter free trade agreements covering areas like agriculture with countries outside the EU, like the US.

But Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson insisted the PM was determined to ensure the measure's 'compatibility with taking back control of our money, laws and borders'.

Mr Johnson and fellow Cabinet Brexiteer Michael Gove gave their public blessing to the deal, with the Environment Secretary describing it as a 'significant personal political achievement for the Prime Minister' which would make more money available for the NHS.

The development was also welcomed by business leaders, who had warned that companies would begin activating plans to move staff and activities abroad if no progress was made by Christmas. The pound rose on the announcement.

In a Brussels press conference, Mrs May said the process of arriving at a withdrawal deal 'hasn't been easy for either side', but the agreement represented a 'significant improvement' on the text she was preparing to sign off on Monday.

Provisions on citizens' rights would allow EU nationals in the UK 'to go on living their lives as before'.

 

Mr Johnson, another senior Brexiteer who has been trying to toughen the government's stance, tweeted his support but made clear the process has only just started

Meanwhile, the financial settlement would be 'fair to the British taxpayer' and the agreement on Ireland would guarantee there would be 'no hard border' between Northern Ireland and the Republic.

'I very much welcome the prospect of moving ahead to the next phase, to talk about trade and security and to discuss the positive and ambitious future relationship that is in all of our interests,' said Mrs May.

Mr Juncker said Brexit was a 'sad' development, but added: 'Now we must start looking to the future, a future in which the UK will remain a close friend and ally.'

Friday's announcement came after late-night telephone conversations with DUP leader Arlene Foster, as the Prime Minister sought a formula which would resolve the party's concerns about Northern Ireland being treated differently from the rest of the UK.

As Number 10's staff Christmas party took place elsewhere in the building, Mrs May finalised a text shortly before midnight.

It specified that 'no new regulatory barriers' will be allowed between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK, and that the province's businesses will continue to have 'unfettered access' to the UK internal market.

Mrs Foster said 'substantial changes' to the text ensured there was 'no red line down the Irish Sea' and no 'special status' for Northern Ireland, but added that there was still further work to be done.

Irish premier Leo Varadkar, who held telephone talks with Mrs May on Thursday as the details of the deal were hammered out, said it was a 'significant day' for Ireland, which 'achieved all that we set out to achieve in phase one of these negotiations'.

The estimated Brexit bill - significantly lower than the £50 billion or more suggested by previous leaks - covers Britain's share of the EU's budget up to the end of 2020, as well as outstanding debts and liabilities for items such as the pensions of staff at European institutions.

It will be paid over several years and the exact figure is unlikely to be known for some time.

The financial settlement 'will be drawn up and paid in euro'.

Jeremy Corbyn said Mrs May had only managed to 'scrape through' the first phase of Brexit negotiations some 18 months after the referendum.

'Tory chaos and posturing has caused damaging delay and risked serious harm to our economy,' said the Labour leader.

'We need a much stronger and more constructive approach in crucial phase two.'

What has been agreed today?

Citizens' rights

The three million EU citizens in the UK and the one million UK citizens living in the EU can stay for their lifetime.

British courts will be able to refer issues about the rights of EU nationals to the European Court of Justice and have 'due regard' for the court's judgement in its decisions for eight years.

This means EU judges will still have some power over the UK after Brexit, but No10 believes this will only relate to 'two or three' cases a year. 

EU citizens in Britain and Northern Ireland will continue to have access to free healthcare and the benefits system after the UK cuts its ties with Brussels.

EU citizens with family outside the UK will also be able to bring them to the UK after Brexit. No 10 said there are no estimates for how many Europeans are expected to move to Britain under this bit of the deal.

Irish border

This was the main thorny issue which threatened to derail the talks after the DUP pulled the plug on initial plans for a deal amid fears it would break up the UK.

But six 'substantial changes' have been made to the deal which ensure Northern Ireland will keep the same rules as the rest of the UK and the border will not be pushed out to the Irish Sea.

It also rules out calls by Sinn Fein to give Northern Ireland 'special status' which would have seen it have different rules to the rest of the UK. 

And it spelled out in black and white that Northern Ireland will not be separated 'constitutionally, politically, economically or regulatory' from the rest of the UK.

And that the UK is committed to retaining its own internal market. 

The document also pledges to keep soft Irish border and to maintain the good Friday Agreement - ensuring Dublin's support for it.

But in a major concession which could spark opposition from Brexiteers, the UK said if it leaves the EU without a deal and does not come up with a plan to keep the border open then it 'will maintain full alignment' with the EU as a full back position.

Brexit bill

Britain has agreed to pay the EU between £35billion and £39billion as part of the divorce package.

Britain will pay the amount over many years to come - meaning Theresa May will not have to hand over a single fat cheque to foot the bill.

The document says: 'The UK will contribute its share of the financing of the budgetary commitments outstanding at 31 December 2020'.

Britain will get around 12 installments of 300m euros back from the European Investment Bank from 2020. 

Despite Philip Hammond insisting this week that the UK should pay whether or not there is a trade deal, the document makes clear the cash is contingent on a final agreement being reached. 

And Ukip's former leader Nigel Farage said the 17.4 million people who backed Leave last year 'did not vote for a large exit fee, the ECJ continuing to have a say over our country or a two-year transition', adding: 'This is not a deal, it's a capitulation.'

Arron Banks, the millionaire founder of the Leave.EU campaign, said the agreement amounted to a 'betrayal' of the country by a 'traitorous, lily-livered embarrassment of a prime minister'.

Mr Tusk warned that 'the most difficult challenge is still ahead'.

'We all know that breaking up is hard, but breaking up and building a new relation is much harder,' said the European Council president.

'Since the Brexit referendum, a year and a half has passed.

'So much time has been devoted to the easier part of the task, and now to negotiate the transition agreement and the framework for our future relationship we have de facto less than a year.'           

 

Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5161623/May-needs-convince-Brexiteer-ministers-EU-deal.html#ixzz50lcOyJKj
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter |
DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

-A BETRAYAL AND SURRENDER TO A EUROPEAN COURT AND PRINCIPLE.-

'NO Deal Is Better Than A Bad Deal'

 

H.F.1410DECEMBER 9-2017

 

*

Tories truce over Brexit cracks over May's compromise | Daily Mail ...

Tory Brexit truce cracks: PM told to walk away from talks by her own Eurosceptic MPs over 'intolerable' demands as she cancels trip to Brussels today after failing to do deal with DUP leader

  • David Davis confirmed some UK economy sectors may have to align with the EU 
  • Eurosceptic ex-leader Iain Duncan Smith suggested it was time to walk away 
  • Cabinet ministers feel they are being kept in the dark about the compromises
  • The DUP have made it clear it would not accept the PM's current proposals

The Tory truce on Brexit was fracturing last night as MPs warned Theresa May they would not accept further compromises with Brussels.

The Prime Minister faced a backlash after David Davis confirmed some sectors of the UK economy could have to align with the EU after Brexit to resolve the Irish border issue.

Former leader Iain Duncan Smith – who has acted as a bridge between No 10 and Eurosceptic MPs until now – described the proposal as 'intolerable' and suggested it was time to walk away from the talks.

 

The Prime Minister had planned to return to Brussels today to try to complete a divorce deal with the EU, but this has been cancelled

Eurosceptic Cabinet ministers also complained they were being kept in the dark about the extent of the compromises, both on the Irish border and the European Court of Justice.

Boris Johnson and Michael Gove are said to be leading a revolt of Brexiteers who have a 'genuine fear' that Mrs May is going to push through a soft option.

The Foreign Secretary reportedly confronted the Prime Minister in a dramatic clash during Cabinet yesterday over her negotiating strategy.

A senior insider told The Sun: 'Cabinet is in the dark about what the PM is doing, which is a very strange state of affairs to be in.' 

 

Michael Gove and Boris Johnson are said to be leading a revolt of Brexiteers who have a 'genuine fear' that Mrs May is going to push through a soft option

Meanwhile the DUP, whose ten MPs prop up the Government, made it clear it would not accept the plans put forward by the Prime Minister on Monday to secure a breakthrough on a post-Brexit trade deal.

Talks with European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker stalled on Monday after DUP leader Arlene Foster vetoed plans for a compromise on the status of the Irish border.

The Prime Minister had planned to return to Brussels today to try to complete a divorce deal with the EU.

But the trip was cancelled last night after Mrs Foster said she would not accept plans to retain 'regulatory alignment' between Northern Ireland and the Republic after Brexit.

Government sources insisted that the proposal on the Irish border was only a 'backstop' designed to open the door to trade talks this month.

 

David Davis confirmed some sectors of the UK economy could have to align with the EU after Brexit to resolve the Irish border issue

A source said the proposal was limited to a few areas linked to the Good Friday Agreement, such as agriculture and energy.

But Mr Duncan Smith warned it could 'box in' the UK, making it a 'supplicant' to Brussels even after Brexit, and preventing the Government striking trade deals.

Mrs May began the day by telling the Cabinet she was 'very close to getting agreement' with the EU on a divorce deal, which she hopes could unlock the door to the start of trade talks. The PM told ministers there were 'only a small number of issues outstanding'.

But a Cabinet source said the detail of the plans had barely been discussed by Mrs May at a meeting of the Cabinet yesterday.

'There is not a lot of clarity here,' the source said. 'People want to be helpful to the PM in this, but they are befuddled by the approach she has taken. People want to see the detail and it is not forthcoming – that is a worry.' Whitehall sources last night revealed that even Mr Davis did not learn that the phrase 'regulatory alignment' had been inserted into a proposed agreement with Brussels until Sunday.

One former minister last night warned the crisis could shorten Mrs May's tenure in No 10, saying: 'The PM is in a very weak position and she needs to wake up to the fact. She is making her position less and less tenable.' One EU ambassador said: 'We cannot go on like this, with no idea what the UK wants. She just has to have the conversation with her own cabinet, and if that upsets someone, or someone resigns, so be it.'

 

Iain Duncan Smith – who has acted as a bridge between No 10 and Eurosceptic MPs until now – described the proposal as 'intolerable'

Tory Sir Bill Cash said any commitment to align all or part of the UK's laws with the EU would be 'massively difficult' to accept.

Former Brexit minister David Jones said the move would make it difficult to strike free trade deals with countries outside the EU. He called the idea 'dangerous', adding: 'If we are aligned with the EU on agriculture, for example, it would be impossible to conclude any meaningful free trade agreements with third countries.'

Jacob Rees-Mogg described the issue as an 'indelible red line' and voiced 'gratitude' to the DUP for vetoing the deal.

What's the truth about trade across the Irish border? 

Analysis by Jack Doyle 

Northern Ireland to Ireland

It might be assumed that trade between Northern Ireland and the Republic formed a very significant part of the province's economy.

But official data shows its economic relationship with the rest of the UK is much more significant. 

Around two thirds of Northern Ireland's turnover involves sales within the province. 

Exports to Great Britain make up 21 per cent, while those to the Republic are just five per cent and to the rest of the EU just three per cent.

 

DUP Sammy Wilson said Northern Irish trade with the UK is more important than with the Republic of Ireland and the rest of Europe

According to the Legatum Institute think tank, trade patterns from before the UK joined the EU in 1973 have proved 'remarkably resilient'.

DUP MP Sammy Wilson has said: 'Our main market is not the Irish Republic. It is not even the whole of the EU. Our main market is the UK, and the integrity of the single UK market is far more important to us, to people who work in Northern Ireland, than having some kind of regulatory convergence or continuance with the rest of Europe.'

Ireland to Great Britain

By contrast to the relatively small scale of its trade with Northern Ireland, the Republic has very significant trade links with Great Britain, its second biggest trading partner. More than 12 per cent of Irish exports go to Great Britain, and 18 per cent of services (compared to 1.6 per cent to Northern Ireland).

It also imports a huge amount from Great Britain, which accounts for 25 per cent of its imports. But because of the size of the two economies, the Republic has a lot more to lose in relative terms from the talks collapsing and no agreement being made on trade.

Estimates of the damage to Irish GDP from a collapse in talks suggest it could fall by up to 3 per cent. Henry Newman, of the Open Europe think tank, warns the Irish have the most to lose of any EU state from no trade deal, and are 'playing with fire'.

 

Walk away from Brexit talks unless the EU drops 'intolerable' demands, Iain Duncan Smith tells Theresa May 

Iain Duncan Smith last night urged Theresa May to abandon Brexit talks unless the EU agrees to back away from its 'intolerable' demands.

In an ominous move, the former Conservative leader went public about his growing concerns with the direction of the negotiations on a potential divorce deal.

Mr Duncan Smith said accepting the EU's demands would leave the UK a 'supplicant' nation after Brexit.

 

Iain Duncan Smith last night urged Theresa May to abandon Brexit talks unless the EU agrees to back away from its 'intolerable' demands

He said he had told the PM: 'We have reached the point where really these sets of demands are demands too far.'

He added that it was time to tell the EU: 'We're not prepared to go down this road any longer, this is not working, we will not box ourselves in.'

Mr Duncan Smith has acted as a bridge between No 10 and the Eurosceptic wing of the Tory Party, helping to persuade MPs to back Mrs May and avoid rocking the boat. His decision to speak out underlines the difficulty Mrs May now faces in persuading the Right of the party to back her approach to Brexit.

But last night Mr Duncan Smith said he could not accept plans to resolve the Irish border issue by signing up to a system of 'regulatory alignment' that could tie sectors of the whole UK economy to Brussels rules after Brexit.

He said it was 'not just the DUP' who were unhappy about a plan that would 'give away our status before we even get to the trade arrangements'. He said agreeing to the demand from Dublin and Brussels would 'box in' the UK's future options and limit our ability to negotiate future trade deals with other countries.

Mr Duncan Smith also voiced grave reservations about allowing any future role for the European Court of Justice, which Brussels is saying should continue to have jurisdiction over EU citizens' rights in Britain.

He told the BBC: 'We are beginning to stare at the edge of what is a price that we simply cannot afford to pay.' Mr Duncan Smith said the EU 'needs to budge'. He said the UK was 'reaching the point fairly fast' where it should just walk away and prepare to leave the EU without a trade deal.

He suggested no deal would be better than a 'wholly intolerable one that leaves us boxed in and unable to make the kind of arrangements with the US, Australia, India and all these other countries that we want to make arrangements with'.

 

Mr Duncan Smith's decision to speak out underlines the difficulty Mrs May now faces in persuading the Right of the party to back her approach to Brexit

And he warned there was a danger that 'we will end up being supplicants in this process rather than being equal partners.'

He added: 'I think the PM is recognising that. It's just becoming very clear that no matter what we say that we will help them with, there is another demand placed there and that stands in the way of trade.'

Signalling the tensions fracturing the Tory Party, former education secretary Nicky Morgan last night rounded on Mr Duncan Smith, saying: 'This is madness. Walking away when the Brexiteers encounter difficulties they never bothered to anticipate is not in the national interest.'



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5149619/Tories-truce-Brexit-cracks-Mays-compromise.html#ixzz50yAGpK8j
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

DECEMBER 6,2017

*  *  *

H.F.1413 -[THERE MUST BE NO SURRENDER TO EU DEMANDS-ENGLAND MUST BE  FREE AS BEFORE TRAITORS WITHIN SOLD US TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU IN 1972 TO ENABLE GERMANY TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE. BRUSSELS IS A POODLE OF THE FOURTH REICH-THE REAL POWER IS IN BERLIN.]

 

*

 

Brought forward from 2009

Revealed: The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich ...in the EU

The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for Germany's post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis' return to power and work for a 'strong German empire'. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

 
Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with I. G. Farben

Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben

The three-page, closely typed report, marked 'Secret', copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany's economy by sending money through Switzerland.

They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire - but not just German.

The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.

The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of Europe. The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War.

But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact.

Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.

Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?

The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 - and it paints an extraordinary picture.

The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.

 
Auschwitz

Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a factory run by German firm I. G. Farben

There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. 'It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.' Such defeatist talk was treasonous - enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo's cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.

But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to 'make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion'.

The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.

They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company.

But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.

Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich.

In stage one, the industrialists were to 'prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis', using the term for the French resistance.

Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a 'secure post-war foundation in foreign countries', while 'existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat'.

In stage three, German businesses would set up a 'sleeper' network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power.

'The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,' Bosse announced.

'Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.'

 
Enlarge   The 1944 Red House Report

Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing 'plans of German industrialists to engage in underground activity'

The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission.

The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.

Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.

Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence.

The Red House Report's author notes: 'Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence.

'Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party's plans for its post-war operations.'

The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter.

More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.

During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it.

A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.

He says: 'By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.'

Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.

As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.

A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad's gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility.

By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf's ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS's massive pan-European economic empire after Germany's defeat.

Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the transition to a post-war economy after Germany's defeat. This was dangerous, especially as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups.

But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service, protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS.

Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS's economic empire almost worthless.

The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to introduce a currency that would have any value.

That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency, Germany was once again an attractive trading partner.

The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires across Europe.

War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 - despite six years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments - the capital stock of assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the armaments boom.

Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered European continent. The answer was through supranationalism - the voluntary surrender of national sovereignty to an international body.

Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today.

But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists convicted of war crimes.

The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years.

Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death.

The Krupp company soon became one of Europe's leading industrial combines.

The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a fortune of more than $1billion, the equivalent of £400million at the time.

'For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,' says historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers.

'The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.'

Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the V1 rocket.

Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with the SS officers overseeing the camps.

Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany's most powerful banker, had prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of Deutsche Bank, Germany's biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded, Deutsche Bank enthusiastically 'Aryanised' Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were owned by Jews.

By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche Bank's wealth had quadrupled.

Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, as Deutsche Bank's representative. I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany's most powerful companies, formed out of a union of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties.

It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other prisoners died producing artificial rubber.

When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis' chilling term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent for which was owned by I.G. Farben.

But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben's bosses hedged their bets.

During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard's research. After the war, 24 I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III - but only twelve of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder.

Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany's post-war reconstruction. It was largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a 'strong German empire' was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today's European Union.

Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid - reconstruction funds - to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany's economic recovery.

Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.

Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are strikingly familiar today - on monetary integration and common transport, energy and welfare systems.

When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs was his most important financial adviser.

Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer.

That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and European Commission.

Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard Germany's first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as Chancellor for three years.

But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe - was built on mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by German companies in the Nazi era was 2,700,000.

Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry.

A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer 5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any further legal action.

To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of £1.8billion.

Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory.

But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief, once said: 'In 50 years' time nobody will think of nation states.

  '[ Is this not the essence of the EU and  the encouragement of mass immigration particularly from the Muslim World?- Added:-Dec-2017]

For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today's drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich - an economic rather than military imperium.

• The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor's thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is published by Reportage Press.

Full ARTICLE

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1179902/Revealed-The-secret-report-shows-Nazis-planned-Fourth-Reich--EU.html#ixzz4oiNwdrtt
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

2009

 

H.F.1270 -BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

 

OUR KB'S (**** ****) DROPPED OVER NIGHT (DECEMBER 10-2017) FROM A REGULAR 95-103 KB's TO JUST 25-35 KB'S

WE ASK! HAVE WE OFFENDED SOMEONE?

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

PART 1-PART 2(1994 -Official Website-DECEMBER- HOME- 2017)- PART 3-PART 4 

 

TOM UTLEY: To the young (like my sons) who think we baby boomers are pampered, selfish, racists, here's why

YOUR ALL SO WRONG

Are you a baby boomer like me, born in the post-war breeding period from 1946 to 1964? If so, you stand accused by increasing numbers of millennials of being a pampered, selfish racist, incapable of coherent thought and not to be trusted with the vote.

Don’t take my word for it. This is the finding of charity workers concerned with the welfare of the elderly.

At a conference in London this week, they warned that, since last year’s EU referendum, there has been an upsurge of ageist prejudice among the resentful young, who feel hard done by and betrayed by their parents’ generation.

 

Millennials, according to a new survey feel betrayed by Baby Boomers over Brexit

 

, I must admit that I was one of the lucky ten per cent or so of baby boomers who went to university in the Sixties and Seventies, with our tuition fees paid by the state

Said Kate Jopling, the former head of public affairs at Help the Aged: ‘[After Brexit], there was a casual use of demonising and divisive language, the bandying around of stereotypes about who older people are, about their economic circumstances, their motivations and even their ability to form rational judgments.

‘Baby boomers used to be talked about as the generation that would change everything. Now it is almost a term of abuse.’

As a 64-year-old father of four — and a Brexiteer to boot — I feel I’ve been on the receiving end of more than my fair share of such demonisation from my own Remainer sons. So on behalf of my fellow baby boomers, I’d like to take this opportunity of entering a plea of Not Guilty to every charge on their generation’s indictment. 

I am also tempted to lay counter-charges against my sons’ own age group, which strikes me in general as being more pampered and selfish than mine, less capable of independent thought — and, yes, less to be trusted with the vote.

According to speakers at The Future of Ageing Conference, millennials’ resentment of baby boomers focuses on three main areas: tuition fees, housing and, of course, the Brexit result. The idea is that we had everything handed to us on a plate — free higher education and affordable homes — and are too selfish to care a damn about how much they suffer.

To rub salt into the wounds of the young, surveys suggest some 60 per cent of us 50 to 65-year-olds voted Leave, while almost three-quarters of 18 to 24-year-olds voted Remain. Thus, we stand accused of wilfully ‘stealing the future’ from our children, who ascribe our decision purely to stupidity and racism. Many add that since they are the ones who will have to live with the long-term consequences of Brexit, they alone should have decided the matter.

Let’s take tuition fees first. Before I go any further, I must admit that I was one of the lucky ten per cent or so of baby boomers who went to university in the Sixties and Seventies, with our tuition fees paid by the state and — in many cases, including mine — a generous maintenance allowance thrown in by our local councils. Indeed, all my life I’ve felt grateful to the miners, welders, street-cleaners and check-out girls who made my higher education possible through their taxes (though, in my defence, I must say I’ve repaid the state many times over since).

But the point is that 90 per cent of my generation didn’t share my good fortune. For when universities depended overwhelmingly on the Treasury for their running costs, places were restricted. Most of my fellow students came from comfortable, middle-class backgrounds, while a hugely disproportionate number of them had been privately educated, as I was.

Contrast this with the position today, after the introduction of tuition fees made possible a rapid expansion in the number of places available, with the proportion of school-leavers going into higher education more than trebling since my day.

What’s more, the student loan system — under which repayments begin only when graduates earn a decent income, and debts are written off after 30 years — has had a dramatic effect on the social composition of the university population.

Though the Left warned it would deter poorer teenagers from applying for places, the opposite has proved true. Indeed, a report this week from the Centre for Global Higher Education finds the proportion of students from families in the bottom fifth of income groups has doubled since fees were introduced in 1998.

Are resentful young graduates really saying the system was fairer all those decades ago, when universities had to compete for funding with every other Whitehall department — forcing them to turn 90 per cent of baby boomers away?

Or do they simply believe in Jeremy Corbyn’s magic money tree, whose fruits will somehow fund free higher education for all — on top of free everything else — while relieving them of all their debts? If so, who’s being stupid and selfish now?

On housing, I have to admit our young antagonists are on firmer ground. Undeniably, it is much harder for them to get on to the ladder after years of mass immigration and marital breakdown, in which supply has failed to keep up with demand.

 

Somehow or other, three-quarters of millennials appear to have run away with the idea that the EU is an earthly paradise of free trade, prosperity, democracy and brotherly love. In their view, it seems, anyone who thinks otherwise must be a thick, pig-headed racist

But to the charge that ‘I’m all right Jack’ baby boomers don’t care about this crisis, I plead an emphatic Not Guilty. We feel the pain acutely — not least, those of us stuck with twentysomething offspring on the premises, treating us to lectures on our selfishness as they tuck into free grub earned by the sweat of our brows.

Indeed, politicians need have no fear of losing older voters’ support if they embark on a mass programme of house building. For most of us, it can’t come too soon.

Then there’s Brexit, the biggest bone of contention of them all. Somehow or other, three-quarters of millennials appear to have run away with the idea that the EU is an earthly paradise of free trade, prosperity, democracy and brotherly love. In their view, it seems, anyone who thinks otherwise must be a thick, pig-headed racist.

I ask them only to consider the facts. How can they think Brussels a guarantor of prosperity, when they see the rampant youth unemployment imposed on southern Europe by the eurocrats’ politically inspired folly of the one-size-fits-all euro?

How can they think the EU stands for free trade and friendship between nations, when, in fact, it erects savage tariff barriers against some of the world’s poorest countries, preventing them from developing in order to protect its own inefficient farmers and industries? 

Take African cocoa. The EU is happy to exempt imports of raw beans from all charges. But in a relic of colonialism, it imposes import tariffs of 30-60 per cent on finished products such as chocolate bars to protect European processors. No wonder the shops are full of overpriced Belgian chocolates, while Africa suffers.

 

How can they think Brussels a guarantor of prosperity, when they see the rampant youth unemployment imposed on southern Europe by the eurocrats’ politically inspired folly of the one-size-fits-all euro?

There’s nothing touchy-feely about this aspect of the monstrous, protectionist cartel that is Brussels.

Yet despite its efforts to protect its own, the EU’s share of world trade has shrunk every year since we joined. Indeed, it’s bewildering how milliennials can think Brussels represents the future.

As for democracy, it doesn’t get a look-in, as unelected officials blithely impose laws on 500 million citizens who have no power to get rid of them. No wonder neo-Nazis and Communists are rearing their ugly heads again, on a continent falling apart at the seams.

Meanwhile what, pray, is racist about demanding an end to the free movement of unskilled, mostly white Europeans, so that we can welcome the skilled workers we need from the rest of the world?

No, you millennials. We baby boomers voted Brexit because we have your interests at heart, to save you from sinking aboard the bureaucratic Titanic.

As for the claim that we were pampered in our youth, millennials are the healthiest, most widely travelled generation in history — with more holidays, clothes, sources of entertainment and an infinitely more exciting diet than most of us could dream of, in the days when roast chicken was the height of luxury.

So why don’t the young lift their eyes from their smartphones, pull those earphones from their lugs, stop whingeing — and start thinking before they vote?



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5134843/TOM-UTLEY-millennials-like-sons-wrong.html#ixzz5067WXQ4b
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter |
DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

'Of the whole sum of human life no small part is that which consists of a man's relations to his country, and his feelings concerning it.-

Gladstone

*

'The love of country produces good manners; and good manners, love of country.- The less we satisfy our individual passions, the more we leave to the general.'-

Montesquieu

*

Be just and fear not; let all the ends thou aimest at, be thy country's, thy God's, and truth's.

Shakespeare

 

*

 

 

DECEMBER-2017

H.F.1401-

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

 

 

 

To hell with these traitor's human rites

 

 

 

 

 

To hell with these traitors' yuman rites: RICHARD LITTLEJOHN says it's good to finally have a Defence Secretary who speaks in plain English

Defence Secretary, Gavin Williamson, arrives for the weekly Cabinet meeting last month

This column has long maintained that those who travelled abroad to join Izal should be stripped of both their passports and their citizenship and denied re-entry to this country.

Ideally, they should be put up against a wall and shot through the head in whichever disgusting desert hell-hole they have chosen to make their home.

Failing that they should be blown to Kingdom Come by a drone strike or Hellfire missile.

That’s what I wrote back in October, after the Tory MP Rory Stewart said the only way to deal with home-grown terrorists was to kill them.

It was refreshing to hear a mainstream politician, even if he is only a junior minister, agreeing with me. I’ve been advocating the same hardline approach ever since hundreds of young British citizens flocked to the Middle East to wage holy war.

Fortunately, our new Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson feels the same way. ‘A dead terrorist can’t cause any harm to Britain,’ he told the Mail this week.

Williamson has given his full support to the RAF and special forces who are believed to be working their way through a ‘kill list’ of jihadis before they can bring murder and mayhem back to the streets of Britain.

Reassuringly, he promised: ‘Our job in terms of eliminating them will not stop this year, will not stop next year, it is something we have got to continue to pursue. This is about keeping Britain safe.’

Any who escape with their lives will have their passports taken away to stop them crossing international borders and re-entering this country.

Hallelujah!

At last we’ve got a Defence Secretary who speaks in plain English not just for the Armed Forces, but also for the British people.

Oh, how the old sweats mocked when 41-year-old Williamson, then Chief Whip, was appointed to head the MoD just over a month ago. He’s a wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper, who knows nothing about defence, they grizzled. Now, though, they can choke on their disdain.

 

In Gavin Williamson, we’ve got a Defence Secretary who speaks in plain English not just for the Armed Forces, but also for the British people, writes Richard Littlejohn

Williamson has already promised a showdown over funding with the Treasury, which would be happy to see the strength of the British Army cut to the bone until it could fit into the back of an armoured personnel carrier — if we’ve got any left.

Spreadsheet Phil, who was Defence Secretary before he became Chancellor, is willing to hand over at least £40 billion (more than Britain’s entire defence budget) to his beloved EU as part of a blackmail — sorry, divorce — payment, while at the same time slashing a further £2 billion from spending on the Armed Forces.

Williamson retaliated by banning Hammond from using the RAF as his own private jet fleet, because the Treasury hasn’t paid the bills.

It might seem petty, but it’s a significant statement of intent. Nothing, repeat nothing, is more vital than the defence of the realm.

Naturally, the hand-wringing yuman rites brigade begs to differ.

 

Some people will try anything to lose weight. A dinner lady from Ipswich has just been nicked for drink-driving after being caught three times over the limit.

In mitigation she said she had been drinking vodka because she heard the property TV presenter Kirstie Allsopp say it had helped her shed a bit of timber.

Some years ago, I had dinner with the late Jeremy Beadle who was on a crash diet before an upcoming series.

It involved eating a plain baked potato three times a day, washed down with a bottle of vodka.

He lost four days.

Max Hill, a liberal QC from central casting, who was hired to review our anti-terror laws, bleats that home-grown jihadis are guilty of nothing more than ‘naivety’ and should be allowed to come home and be ‘reintegrated’ into society. Hundreds have been able to drift back to Britain already.

It emerged yesterday that MI5 only has the capacity to monitor round the clock 50 or 60 of those considered the greatest threat.

Yet how much safer this country would be if they could all have been killed before they had the chance to ‘reintegrate’ themselves by blowing up a Tube train, mowing down pedestrians in a stolen van or stabbing to death late-night revellers.

The Left are predictably squealing with outrage over Williamson’s remarks. Labour claims that ‘eliminating’ these terrorists is extra-judicial murder and in breach of the Geneva Convention.

But the Geneva Convention was designed for conventional warfare. It should apply only to those who agree to abide by the Geneva Convention. Izal may call itself a ‘state’ and rally behind a fancy flag, but it is little more than a gang of bloodthirsty desperados who get high on torture, rape and mass murder.

Calling them ‘combatants’ is too polite. I don’t even accept they’re ‘British’, even if they were born here and carry British passports.

They could not be further removed from the vast majority of loyal and law-abiding British Muslims living here.

These jihadis are not our ‘fellow citizens’; they’re traitors — our sworn enemies.

Their allegiance is to an international terrorist organisation and their own warped interpretation of a global religion.

As Gavin Williamson says: ‘They hate everything that Britain stands for, hate our values, hate that Britain is a beacon to the world of democracy and tolerance.’

The sooner they are all wiped off the face of the earth, the better.

Orchestral manoeuvres

Having exposed so much ‘inappropriate’ behaviour in politics, entertainment and the media, the torchlit ‘historic’ sex crimes posse have turned their attention to the world of classical music.

James Levine, conductor of the Metropolitan Opera in New York, has been suspended following a complaint that he had sexual contact with a teenager in 1986. 

Given that where America leads, Britain follows, it can only be a matter of time before the Jimmy Savile squad gets in on the act.

 

James Levine, conductor of the Metropolitan Opera in New York, has been suspended following a complaint that he had sexual contact with a teenager in 1986

How long until we see a senior police officer standing outside the Albert Hall, appealing for ‘victims’ of Sir Henry Wood to come forward?

Soon they’ll be rounding up dozens of violinists, oboe and piccolo players, accused of ‘historic’ offences in the orchestra pit. We’ll have to learn a whole new meaning for the expression ‘fiddler’s elbow’.

An African migrant jailed twice for sex attacks in Britain has been awarded £110,000 compensation after his own country refused to take him back.

Eh? Just run that by me again. In what parallel universe are British taxpayers forced to give a small fortune to a foreign criminal we are trying to kick out of the country? How did that happen?

Aliou Bah, 28, came here from Guinea in 2007 to join his father. He was subsequently convicted of two sexual assaults, for which he was sentenced to 18 months and two years respectively.

Since the end of the second sentence he has been held for 21 months in an immigration detention centre while the authorities tried to deport him. But Guinea said they didn’t want him and simply refused to process his travel documents. It turns out we haven’t been able to deport anyone to Guinea since 2006.

And because he had previously been granted asylum, a court has ruled that he was detained unlawfully. Even the judge thought it was insane, but rules is rules.

I’m assuming that Bah has also received tens of thousands of pounds in legal aid, not just for defending him in the two sex cases, but also to bring his claim for compensation.

Meanwhile, neither of his victims has received a penny and yet he has been released back on to the streets, where he could strike again, with a cheque for 110 grand in his back pocket.

Apparently, there are almost 6,000 convicted foreign criminals free in this country, all of whom have been released despite being candidates for deportation.

We don’t even know where some of them have come from. Hundreds have simply vanished.

Soft-touch Britain? You couldn’t make it up.

One of the unalloyed joys of the freedom of movement has been the way our city centres have been transformed by colourful newcomers, who make such a valuable contribution to our society.

Where would we be without the gangs of exotic Eastern European gypsies who have set up camp here?

Only this week, Roma beggars surrounded Prince and Princess Michael of Kent as they left a Mayfair nightclub. The Prince gave them a tenner, but they kept pestering him.

Mayfair is a popular pitch, where beggars believe there are rich pickings. And it’s not just foreigners, either. My wife and a friend were walking through the area last week, not far from Claridge’s hotel, when they were accosted by a vagrant with a broad Glaswegian accent.

‘Hey, missus. Can ya spare twenty-five thousand pound?’

When they stopped laughing, they gave him a quid.


Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5158115/To-hell-traitors-yuman-rites.html#ixzz50fwiEAxn
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

firmness

 

 

'

'THE GREATEST FIRMNESS IS THE GREATEST MERCY.'

 

 

Longfellow, Henry Wadsworth (1807-32) Am.Poet

 

*

 

 

'Firmness, both  in suffering and exertion, is a character which I would wish to possess - I have always despised the whining yelp of complaint, and the cowardly feeble resolve.'-

 

BURNS,Robert(1759-96) Scot poet

 

 

[THERESA May - must NOT Kow-Tow to the present advocates of Hitler's plan for German domination of EUROPE. Our country has not fought two WORLD WARS with that FOE not to understand that FIRMNESS she can UNDERSTAND.  Other once FREE NATION STATES in EUROPE are watching a once WORLD POWER and may in the not to distant future require our HELP and SUPPORT to

LEAVE

the

BEAST of BERLIN

 which we can best offer

 if

BREXIT means BREXIT

 

AS

 

 

THERESA MAY- SINCERELY  PROMISED.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 9-2014

H .F .1409

 
 

 

Why standing up for Christmas 'will help defeat extremism

by Steve Doughty-

Daily Mail-Social Affairs Correspondent

September 9-2016

' Miss Casey finally said in the article above: '

I have become convinced that it is only the upholding of our core British [English] laws, cultures, values and traditions that will offer us the route through the different and complex challenge of creating a

 COHESIVE SOCIETY.

Full article

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE**** GAMBLING AND ETHICS****CHRISTIANITY,THE PEOPLE, AND ETHICS****IMMIGRATION POLICY**** CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION_IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE_WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE****CHRISTIAN BELIEFS UNDER ATTACK BY EU'S PARLIAMENT IS INTELLECTUAL NAZISM**** A DEFENCE OF CHRISTIANITY BY A ONCE AGNOSTIC****WHO CARES ABOUT MORALITY****DEMOCRACY WITHOUT MORALITY AND RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUALITY IS DESPOTISM****THE WORLD IS DIVIDED INTO MANY RELIGIOUS CIRCLES OF INFLUENCE****THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY****CHRISTIAN PARLIAMENTARIAN SPEAKS ON TAX BILLS-FOREIGN POLICY-PEACE-AND THE POWER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS****OURS MIGHT BE A STRONGER AND HAPPIER SOCIETY IF CHRISTIANS WERE READIER TO DEFEND THEIR VALUES****SUNDAY SCHOOL CAN SAVE CHILDREN FROM DELINQUENCY-SAYS BISHOP****OUR CHRISTIAN FESTIVAL OF EASTER WHICH MANY KNOW SO LITTLE AND SOME NONE****

AN AGE WHEN ALL FAITHS ARE EQUAL-EXCEPT CHRISTIANITY****

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN-by -MICHAEL NAZIR ALI-BISHOP OF ROCHESTER-DEC-2006****

 

WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY

 

 

O COME ALL YE FAITHFUL…

EXCEPT CHRISTIANS.

 

 

 

*   *   *

 

FREEDOM

 

 

[At the REFERENDUM  the greater number of REMAINERS  in WALES and SCOTLAND... voted in effect to LOSE THEIR IDENTITY because being within the nation state destroyer  -

Hitler's planned EU

 - would see eventually by the devious art of gradualism, the lose of much they hold dear. If there was one nation which should have stood against the EU then Scotland gave its answer in the year 1320 in their:-

Arbroath Manifesto sent by the nobles and Commons of Scotland to the Pope in Rome.

 

'We fight not for glory nor for wealth nor for honour but for that freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.'

Even in 1707 many Scotsmen were against losing their heritage but they retained their LAWS and KIRK and greater possibilities for TRADE  the TREATY was signed.

In JUNE 2016  the majority in Scotland voted to stay within the

CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC EU

and the attitude no doubt was simply

WHAT CAN I GET OUT OF IT?

We have always stated in our

 EDP policy

'That all the NATION STATES within the BRITISH ISLES should be FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES with FOREIGN POLICY and DEFENCE the matter for a SUPREME ISLAND COUNCIL...']

ALFRED CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-

*

Why can’t we have the right to be

English?

 

by

 

Paul Johnson

 

 

ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY

 

Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND? ****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WHERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****    ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****    ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/****ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****  THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

SEPTEMBER 9,2016

H.F.971 BREXIT NOW

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

 

 

It is not Alan Partridge who's the EU dinosaur: RICHARD LITTLEJOHN on why he is no fan of self-regarding celebs who sneer at the masses

 

The other night I was invited to a gala Christmas dinner in London. At the next table was St

The grand finale featured a band of guardsmen playing a Last Night of the Proms medley — Rule Britannia!, Land Of Hope And Glory, you know the drill.

Everyone stood up, linking arms, singing along, waving napkins. Everyone, that is, except Coogan and his acolytes. He looked as if the cat had done a whoopsie in his walnut brownie and Guinness ice cream. 

Given that Coogan is a socialist who supports Jeremy Corbyn, I’m assuming he’s read George Orwell’s 1941 essay The Lion And The Unicorn.

‘England is perhaps the only great country whose intellectuals are ashamed of their own nationality. 

In Left-wing circles it is always felt that there is something slightly disgraceful in being an Englishman and that it is a duty to snigger at every English institution, from horse racing to suet puddings.

‘It is a strange fact, but it is unquestionably true that almost any English intellectual would feel more ashamed of standing to attention during God Save The King than of stealing from a poor box.’

I’ve quoted those passages before, because so much wisdom in Orwell’s essay still applies to the modern Guardian-reading classes.

What has any of this got to do with Coogan? Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I refer you to his remarks in the Radio Times, comparing the 17.4 million people who voted Leave in the EU referendum to ‘dinosaurs’ like Alan Partridge.

‘The world has coalesced into a situation that is sympathetic to Alan, which for me is quite depressing. Sometimes I agree with Alan but on Brexit I’m a Remainer, and I feel quite conflicted about it. But the fact is having a fool praise something is a far more powerful indictment than just criticising it.

‘He’s definitely a bit of a dinosaur. Unbelievably, you look around at the world now and see that there are still broadcasters with full-on, red-blooded Alan-like attitudes.

‘We thought we had thoroughly debunked that. It just shows how little influence you actually have on the national culture.’

Before I tip the statutory silver-handled bucketload of ordure over Coogan, let me emphasise that it’s nothing personal. I loved Alan Partridge and admire anyone with Coogan’s talent.

 

Before I tip the statutory silver-handled bucketload of ordure over Coogan, let me emphasise that it’s nothing personal. I loved Alan Partridge and admire anyone with Coogan’s talent

Nor would I dream of defending those journalists who hacked his mobile phone and turned him so fervently against the popular Press.

But, equally, I abhor self-regarding celebs who set themselves up as our moral arbiters and sneer at the masses who pay their wages.

The default position of gobby Remoaners is that everyone who voted Leave is either a gullible, brain-dead moron or a dyed-in-the-wool racist, who’d be better off dead — sooner rather than later.

Who are the real ‘dinosaurs’ — the majority who voted for Britain to become once-again a free-booting, sovereign nation, fully engaged with the rest of the world and equipped to respond to the fast-moving challenges of the 21st century?

Or those wedded to the idea of this great country as a supplicant of a stifling, sclerotic, anti-democratic European superstate, designed in the immediate aftermath of World War II, 70-odd years ago?

What really rankles about the likes of Coogan is not so much their imagined intellectual superiority but the fact that somehow they all still think they’re daring, anti-Establishment warriors.

Like New Labour in its arrogant pomp, they refuse to acknowledge that they are the Establishment today — just as the Red Nose ‘alternative’ comics of the Eighties turned into a Leftish version of the pro-celebrity golf crowd they always professed to despise.

Does Coogan really believe that he’d be invited by the BBC to bring back Alan Partridge from satellite television obscurity if he intended to mock the Remain cause?

What do you think?

The only reason Partridge is being revived is to add to the torrent of anti-Leave abuse on mainstream television.

‘Unbelievably, you look around at the world now and see that there are still broadcasters with full-on, red-blooded Alan-like attitudes.’

 

One of the most depressing things I read recently was the admirable Matt Lucas saying he wouldn’t make Little Britain today because it would offend too many people

Eh? Where are all these ‘Alan-like’ pro-Brexit broadcasters, then? Certainly not on the BBC, which packs every news bulletin and quiz show with smug, self-regarding, pro-Remain conformists.

If Coogan really wanted to stand out from the herd, he’d create a character who ridiculed the Left-wing consensus, not reinforced it.

One of the most depressing things I read recently was the admirable Matt Lucas saying he wouldn’t make Little Britain today because it would offend too many people.

But what was so fabulous about that show was the way in which it slaughtered so many sacred cows — and made fun of every protected species from social workers to transsexuals.

Can you imagine how refreshing such a series would be today?

Where are the comedians who are prepared to send up the preposterous Chuka Umunnas and Anna Soubrys of this world? How about Chuka as Chucky, the deranged Remainer? Or Soubry as a drunken Edna-The-Inebriate-Woman bag lady, pining Shirley Valentine-style for her lost European gigolo?

Who is ‘brave’ enough to poke fun at the ridiculous Bob Geldof or satirise the intolerant ‘diversity’ fascists?

Coogan used to do some of the voices for Spitting Image, including Jimmy Savile. Would he reprise that role today — or depict Labour’s John McDonnell as a dead-eyed IRA godfather? That would be properly edgy and innovative.

Then again, he might surprise us all by reinventing Alan Partridge as a multi-millionaire Left-wing comedian who projectile vomits every time he hears the National Anthem. But I wouldn’t hold your breath. A-Ha!

 

 

Over the weekend, police treated us to photographs of the security measures to prevent a Berlin-style terror attack at Lincoln Christmas market.

Precautions included concrete barriers, overhead drones and armed officers on the streets.

In the first three days, 180,000 people attended without incident. Yet on Sunday, the market was cancelled when snow was forecast.

Simon Walters, ‘event commander’ — they do love their fancy titles, don’t they? — said the decision had been taken to ensure public safety.

Seventy coaches were turned away. Stall-holders lost money and caterer Tom Wilkinson said he had to throw away thousands of sausage rolls.

Inevitably, Lincoln only got a light dusting of snow on Sunday. So elf’n’safety succeeded where the terrorists failed.

Makes you proud to be British.

 

 

What if the boot was on the other foot?

 

Tory councillor Keith Prince

The Tory councillor who oversees London’s transport network has apologised for a heated dispute he had with a woman passenger on a commuter train.

Why? The row, on the 8.50 from Dartford, Kent, was caught on video by another passenger, after Keith Prince told the woman to take her feet off his seat.

It escalated quickly and the woman subjected him to a torrent of foul-mouthed abuse and threatened to kick him in the groin. She took out her mobile phone, presumably to post the confrontation on social media, and said: ‘So I get on the train and this white idiot . . .’

When Mr Prince told her his wife was Nigerian, she replied: ‘Trust me, she doesn’t love you. I’m Nigerian, I know what women want.’

Fortunately, they cooled off and were laughing together by the time the train reached London. So what was Mr Prince apologising for? OK, so it was simply good manners. But he was in the right.

If anyone was owed an apology, he was.

I’m not suggesting this should have been taken any further — far from it.

But just imagine if the boot had been on the other foot, so to speak. What if he’d put his feet on the woman’s seat, threatened to assault her and called her a ‘black idiot’?

If she, or any other passenger, had claimed this was a ‘racist’ incident, you can bet your life the police would have become involved and Mr Prince would have found himself up in court charged with a ‘hate crime’.

His feet wouldn’t have touched . . .

  • Fair enough, I know I’m getting old and should probably pay more attention, but who — or what — is Georgia Toffolo? It sounds like something from the dessert menu in a trendy American barbecue joint. She’s as sweet as Toffolo honey . . . 

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5169575/It-not-Alan-Partridge-whos-EU-dinosaur.html#ixzz513ItLpl9
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter |

*  *  *

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 11, 2014

H .F.1415

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

 

U.S. military to declare martial law as DOJ, FBI criminality exposed

The U.S. military government, known to the world as the administration of President Donald Trump, is about to declare martial law, Pentagon sources say.  “The Cabal has been checkmated, as Trump is ready to federalize the National Guard in case of riots or civil unrest,” Pentagon sources say, adding that “FEMA camps will be used to house mass arrests, and Gitmo may house high-value targets while military tribunals will dispatch them swiftly.”

Such radical action is necessary, “Because of corrupt judges appointed by [former U.S. President Barack] Obama and a Congress stacked with shills for Israel, so Trump may be forced to declare martial law to impose military justice,” is how one Pentagon source put the situation.  The FBI, for example, has been actively covering up the cabal slaughter of hundreds of Americans in Las Vegas using G4S mercenaries, multiple sources say.

Trump was probably referring to this upcoming purge in the following Tweet:  “After years of Comey, with the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation (and more) running the FBI, its reputation is in tatters—worst in History!  But fear not, we will bring it back to greatness.”

The other big news from last week is that the U.S. Dover Air Force Base was hit last with a nuclear weapon or the equivalent.  The attack was described as a magnitude 4.4 earthquake in the corporate media.  However, the “earthquake” had all the hallmarks of a nuclear or beam weapon attack in that its epicenter was a military base, it was shallow, and the seismograph shows a huge one-off instant quake, not the sort of shaking buildup seen in natural quakes.  It can be seen in the link below.

http://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/local/2017/11/30/earthquake-strikes-kent-county-thursday/911208001/

Although the attack took place the day after North Korea announced it had ICBMs that could hit anywhere in the U.S., Pentagon sources are saying this was part of the undeclared civil war inside the military-industrial complex.  The Dover base is where U.S. military and other dead bodies are “processed,” and it is also home to long-range heavy-lifting air transports.  Since the CIA smuggled heroin back to the U.S. in coffins during the Vietnam War, it is a pretty good guess that this base was taken out because it was a major trans-shipment point for Afghan heroin.

There was also visible evidence last week of at the very least, a low-earth-orbit space war going on, as what Pentagon sources describe as “rogue satellites” were

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

Huge actionable intelligence haul from Marine raid on CIA HQ

The good guys are winning, folks, and it will not be long before the last brainwashed slaves are freed from the Khazarian debt-slavery mind-control matrix and the criminals rounded up.

The Marine raid last week on CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia has yielded a huge haul of actionable intelligence, say Pentagon and other sources.  “[U.S. President Donald] Trump is winning BIG, with Clinton-linked pedo rings busted in China as well as the Philippines, Africa, and Germany.  Military tribunals and sealed indictments across the USA are approaching 4,000,” according to Pentagon sources.

This raid was made possible because Trump signed an executive order on October 20th to recall retired military to active duty in order to “take down the Bush-Clinton cabal, the Jewish mafia, and purge the CIA and FBI of traitors,” the sources say.

The sources say that during the November 18th raid on CIA headquarters, computers and documents were seized and as a result, “some 400 drug facilities were located and the U.S. military began bombing them in Afghanistan on November 19th.”  They added that the bombed locations were labelled as the Taliban’s in order “to be politically correct.”  In other words, they do not want the world to think there is a civil war going on inside the military-industrial complex.

In any case, “The Marines have proven once again that they are semper fidelis (always faithful), as this was not just a military operation but an intelligence operation, a psychological warfare operation, and the largest anti-drug operation in history,” the sources continue.

In addition to cutting off heroin money from Afghanistan, the cutting off of air flights and land connections to North Korea has stopped the flow of amphetamine money to the Khazarian cabal as well, according to Asian secret society sources.

The mass arrests and deportation of the MS-13 El Salvadorian gang who are hired killers for drug kingpin El Chapo, as well as a new attack on the Mexican and Colombian drug cartels, means cocaine money from South America is also being cut off.  The ongoing legalization of marijuana worldwide has also cut off that source of Khazarian black money.

With CIA drug money influence drying up, the International Criminal Court is poised to prosecute the CIA and the Bush cabal for torture and other war crimes in Afghanistan as well as elsewhere, the Pentagon and other sources say.

Also, one of the largest corruption cases in U.S. military history has led to the investigation of 440 people, including 60 admirals—one third of the Navy’s top brass.  The removal of these corrupt officers, mostly stationed in Asia, means the 7th Fleet is soon going to stop protecting the corrupt politicians in Japan, South Korea, and the secret Khazarian colony of North Korea.  This will mean that U.S. arrests will be followed by similar arrests in Asia.

ONE-THIRD of all Navy brass caught in huge foreign bribery scandal

The Japanese criminals involved in the March 11, 2011 tsunami and nuclear mass-murder attack on Japan, fearing for their lives, have detained whistleblower and Gnostic Illuminati Grandmaster “Alexander Romanov,” aka Slasha Zaric, and confined him in inhuman conditions at the Hasegawa Hospital in Fuchu, Tokyo.  The hospital phone number is 81-422-31-8600.  Former Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone, former Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori, the mayor of Koganei City, the Police Chief of Koganei City, and all other criminals involved in the Fukushima crime against humanity will be jailed and eventually executed unless they release Zaric and immediately hold press conferences to confess their sins.  Their assets will be impounded and Zaric will be compensated for the harm that has been done to him, say White Dragon Society (WDS) sources.  Of course, senior masterminds in the U.S., Italy, and Switzerland will also be brought to justice for these crimes.

Many top Khazarian mobsters like Bill Gates and George Soros have already been “taken out of commission,” WDS sources say.  Next among the most prominent people expected to be taken down are Eric Schmidt of Google, Jeff Bezos of Amazon, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, as well as

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

Two Feather Says ~ Pray for me Please

Two Feather Says  ~ Pray for me Please

Now goes to a jury trial after 6 months, for false charges from the “Dark Side.” Hanging over his head is 10 to 20 years in a Federal Penitentiary. This is a final request to those who have compassion for this Native American Healer and Spiritual Adviser to be able to continue these services to the World.

Such Teachers are Diminishing. 

Please donate your compassionate contribution to compensate his Lawyer, who is tops and deserves to be paid.

Any Donation Will be Accepted with Great Gratitude.  An E-book can be sent to you when they come out soon, as a thank-you.

At generosity.com    Two Feather Legal fund

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fMvjTcdeUw   

This $50 Thousand dollar ‘Bill’ can be hit by small & well-intentioned contributions from the  “World” ~ 

“Thank You Very Much,” says Two Feather, and Many Blessings.  Please make a difference.

 Bless you, Ben, and Thanks for your backup;  it really made a difference.

 AHO TF

Khazarian cabal purge accelerates:  Marines storm CIA HQ;  Over 2000 indicted in U.S.;  Collapse of control grid in Europe

The purge of the satanic Khazarian cabal that turned the West evil is accelerating at an undeniable pace.  Most importantly, Pentagon sources confirm multiple Internet reports that Marines stormed the CIA headquarters this past weekend.  One of the aims was to shut down Operation Mockingbird, the CIA group that turned the mass media, as well as Google, Facebook, etc. into mass mind-control propaganda, say NSA sources.

The institutional heirs to the group that murdered President John F. Kennedy are also being rounded up, according to Pentagon sources.  “The Department of Justice and [Special Counsel Robert] Mueller are working overtime and may exceed 2000 sealed indictments,” a Pentagon source says.

These moves, combined with the purge of all the Saudi royals and military who were linked to 9/11, as well as the removal of Zimbabwe dictator Robert Mugabe and the imminent removal of Israeli satanist Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, leave no doubt that the long-awaited arrests and roundups of cabalists worldwide has begun.

The Rothschild/Saxe Gotha family group is also losing control over Europe.  In Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel (Hitler’s daughter) failed to form a new government.  In France, a hundred legislators from Rothschild-slave President Emmanuel Macron’s party have defected, as mass protests against this election-stealer’s rule break out all across the country.  In England, Rothschild-slave Prime Minister Theresa May is also unpopular and expected to be removed soon.

Meanwhile in Japan, Admiral Harry Harris, Commander of the United States Pacific Command, met with slave Prime Minister Shinzo Abe last week.  According to sources who were at the meeting, Abe told Harris that…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

DECEMBER  4, 2017

H.F.1402

 
[MAN of the PEOPLE]

 

 

Trump's critics won't admit it but the US economy is on the march - and it could be about to get even better, writes JUSTIN WEBB

The received wisdom after a turbulent few days in American politics is that Donald Trump has suffered a stinging defeat, his Republican party is in disarray, and the Democrats are on the road to recovery at the mid-term polls next year.

Well, wrong, wrong and (probably) wrong again.

It’s true that Trump backed Roy Moore, a firebrand evangelical, as the Republican candidate for a Senate seat in Alabama. It is true that Moore lost last week to a Democrat.

 

Trump's tax reforms are edging closer to being signed off and will provide a major boost to blue-collar workers across America

But the President’s response should give us pause. When the votes were counted in Alabama, he phoned the winner, Doug Jones, and congratulated him warmly. He even invited him to the White House. 

Poison

He has moved on — as well he might. Not having Roy Moore in Washington is a plus for Trump and for the Republicans. Yes, their Senate majority is cut to 51 against 49.

But how much trouble would it have been for the party to have Moore — a man accused of sex offences by at least seven women — in the seat of power? A man who thinks 9/11 was divine punishment. A man who wants Muslims to be second-class citizens.

He would have been poison for the Republicans and a gift for the Democrats.

The other good news for the President is that he and the Republicans are about to have a very big day, which will surely change the subject.

For all Trump’s bluster and madcap energy, most people take a view of politics based on what’s happening in their own lives. And away from his ill-advised retweets of far-Right British racists, away from the rows about him recognising Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, Donald Trump’s America is on the march.

Imagine for a moment that you work as a carpenter on an American building site. You live in upstate New York. In summer it’s sweaty, in winter it’s freezing. 

You work hard, as does your wife or girlfriend, who’s a waitress or a hairstylist. Neither of you went to college, but both of you want dignified jobs and a decent life.

What has happened to that couple’s lives since Donald Trump was elected? Hillary Clinton claimed during the election last year that a multi-millionaire property developer like Trump would ditch the little people once he got into office. But she was wrong.

All the bleating about Trump — often from those who share his privileged background — has hidden a simple fact about his presidency: a large and important constituency believe he has delivered what he promised, in economic terms at least, and is about to deliver even more.

There is rising optimism that the tax reforms will be signed off, and that will have a huge impact on America, and possibly the wider world, which should benefit from a resurgent American economy.

 

All three US stock exchanges hit record highs this week amid growing consumer confidence and record investment in small businesses

This week, all three major stock exchanges in the U.S. soared to record highs. Though it is not certain what the new tax levels will be, Trump has already talked of his ‘giant’ tax cuts being a ‘big, beautiful Christmas present’ for voters.

The suggestion is that as well as cuts at the lower pay levels, income tax for top earners might drop from 39.6 per cent to 37 per cent. 

Crucially, corporation tax — paid on firms’ profits — is likely to fall from 35 per cent to 21 per cent, which should spark growth and job creation.

When the final bill is passed by Congress and signed by the President, it will be a genuine political achievement.

But even before the tax cut, blue-collar America has been having a better time of it than at any stage in recent memory.

Consider if you were a cleaner or factory worker in the States. Both groups have seen their pay rise by 11 per cent in one year. 

Bus drivers are up more than 4 per cent. Maintenance men and women are getting more than 3 per cent extra a year. The list goes on. It includes hairdressers and waitresses and truck drivers. It certainly includes those carpenters on building sites.

No wonder consumer confidence has gone through the roof. No wonder small businesses, the engine of the U.S. economy, are reporting record investment and activity levels.

Another Trump promise was the cutting of regulations for businesses. Again he has delivered. There is less paperwork for fish farms. Easier approvals for apprenticeships. New freedom for private railways to select the trains they use.

He also promised a new age for the energy industry, and that is coming to pass, too. Fracking — a cheap, efficient means to extract shale gas and oil from the ground — has taken off after a big dip in activity when energy prices fell and it became less economic. There are more than 900 active rigs in America now, up from fewer than 600 a year ago.

With inflation still low and wages picking up, there is a sense among many ordinary Americans doing humdrum jobs that — finally — they are reaching better times. The stock market is booming at record highs, too, after climbing almost relentlessly from the day he was elected. 

Benefit

And that was before the announcement that tax cuts were on the way.

Now let us be blunt about those cuts. Trump claims they won’t benefit him, but experts say the rich will do very nicely out of them. 

This is not a redistribution of money from rich to poor. People with private jets, for example, get new exemptions for their maintenance costs. Not very helpful if you work on a building site.

But the bill also cuts taxes for those in work but not on high pay. It will put more money in people’s pockets, and if they spend that money, the economy will benefit.

 
 

Trump's tax plan does provide many incentives for the wealthy such as a tax break for private jet owners, but also aims to bring back wealth from overseas to be taxed at home

There is another aspect of Trump’s plan, however, which could provoke a sea change in the American financial landscape — and it concerns eye-watering sums of money. To be precise: $1.3 trillion.

At present, that mountain of money sits in accounts held outside America. It belongs to American companies who keep it ‘offshore’ because of the fact that they don’t pay tax on their profits unless they bring the money back into the U.S.; Apple alone has more than $200 billion stashed in this way. 

Ruinous

Trump’s tax bill offers these giant firms a deal: bring your money back in, and we will tax it very lightly. His view is that it’s better to get some tax than none at all, especially if the companies spend those profits on investments in the U.S.

The President’s other hope is that American manufacturers which currently use cheap foreign labour will start giving jobs to U.S. workers instead.

So is all this too good to be true? Well, yes and no. Blue-collar workers do feel better off than they have for some time.

But if you are very poor in America — if you are unemployed and your child has a chronic illness, for example — the Trump economy is not for you, because the tax cuts don’t help those on benefits, or alter the ruinous cost of healthcare.

There are concerns, too, about the long-term cost to the nation. The plan will add a whacking trillion-and-a-half dollars over ten years to America’s debt — which already stands at $20 trillion.

The President says economic growth driven by the cuts will cover those costs. But his government may well have to recoup some of the money lost to the Treasury by removing personal tax breaks, which is most likely to disadvantage middle-class workers.

For now at least, though, the Trump economy seems to be working.

To many people watching from overseas, or from swanky parts of America, the President looks crass and foolish at best. He frightens and repels them.

But put yourself in the shoes of that carpenter in New York state: Trump seems to be delivering for you. Come 2020 and the next presidential election, you might even vote for him again, and so might your friends.



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5196791/Trumps-economy-march-writes-JUSTIN-WEBB.html#ixzz51o7mbnJW
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

  *  *  *

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

STATESMANSHIP

 

 

'True statesmanship is the art of changing a nation from what it is into what it ought to be.'-

W. R. ALGER (1822-1905 ) Am. Unit clergy.

 

*

 

H.F.1420

 

Library books saying it's OK to beat your wife if she refuses sex are among misogynistic material found in Islamic schools across Britain

  • Ofsted has put together a file of the worst examples of discrimination and sexism its inspectors found in schools

  • Among the books they found was one titled 'women who deserve to go hell'

  • One school Ofsted visited encouraged children to read a text that contrasted the 'noble women of the East' with the 'internally torn woman of the West'

  • The findings comes as Muslims girls wearing the hijab in primary schools will be quizzed as to why by inspectors 

 

Amanda Spielman, the chief inspector, has said she wants to ensure that children at religious schools are prepared for 'life in modern Britain'

Library books claiming hell is mostly full of women because they are 'ungrateful to their husbands' have been found in Islamic schools, it has emerged.

Ofsted has put together a file of the worst examples of discrimination and sexism its inspectors found in schools.

Among the library books they found was one titled 'women who deserve to go hell' which claimed it was wrong for wives to show 'ingratitude to their husband' or have 'tall ambitions'. 

And it advises pupils: 'In the beginning of the 20th century, a movement for the freedom of women was launched with the basic objective of driving women towards aberrant ways.'

The book was written by Egyptian preacher Mansoor Abdul Hakim.  

Other books said in a Muslim marriage 'the wife is not allowed to refuse sex to her husband' or 'leave the house where she lives without his permission' while boys and girls were taught the 'man by way of correction can also beat her'. 

One school Ofsted visited encouraged children to read a text that contrasted the 'noble women of the East' with the 'internally torn woman of the West'.

It claimed western women attract men and hang around aimlessly in cinemas and cafés. 

The materials came from state-funded schools as well as private faith schools and those running illegally as under-the-radar madrassas without registering with the government.

Inspectors also claimed teachers said that women had a responsibility 'only to bear children and bring them up as Muslims', The Times reported. 

In a box entitled 'daily life and relationships', a pupil had written that men are 'physically stronger' and women are 'emotionally weaker'.

The worksheet was covered in approving red ticks from the teacher. 

Ofsted insiders said the discovery of the books made for 'uncomfortable reading'.  

There are 177 Muslim schools in England, of which 148 are independent, and the rest state-funded.

The Department for Education has been contacted for comment. 

The findings comes as Muslims girls wearing the hijab in primary schools will be quizzed as to why by inspectors.

 
 

The findings by Ofsted comes as Muslims girls wearing the hijab in primary schools will be quizzed as to why by inspectors (file picture)

Head of Ofsted Amanda Spielman said creating an environment where Muslim children are expected to wear the headscarf 'could be interpreted as sexualisation of young girls'.   

It comes after it was revealed a fifth of 800 primary schools now list the headscarf in their uniform policy.

This is despite the fact a hijab is usually only worn by young women after puberty and in front of men for modesty reasons - not by primary school children.

Campaigners have said it should be 'fiercely resisted' and claimed it could 'sexualise' young children. 

Aisha Ali-Khan, a Muslim feminist campaigner and a teacher for 13 years, told MailOnline: 'The hijab should be banned from primary schools but local authorities are afraid of causing offence to the Muslim community and afraid of being branded as racist.

'A headscarf or hijab, is usually worn by girls who have reached puberty, to prevent unwanted sexual advances from men.

'How can a four or five year old child make an informed choice? It's not allowed in Islam so why is it being allowed in schools? You should only do something if you want to and understand the concept behind it.

'But the local authorities are too scared to go back and our government has allowed this to be part of the school policy and that's wrong. They are allowing decisions to be made by schools and local authorities which is worrying and they are trying to wash their hands of all responsibility.'

Gina Khan, a children's rights campaigner in Birmingham, added: 'Schools are allowing it because they are afraid of being called Islamophobic and they have been told that this is a religious garment - but they need to support Muslim girls to have free choices, not to be set apart from other children.' 

But the Muslim Council of Britain said Ofsted's policy was 'deeply worrying'.

Secretary general Harun Khan said: 'It is deeply worrying that Ofsted has announced it will be specifically targeting and quizzing young Muslim girls who choose to wear the headscarf.

'It sends a clear message to all British women who adopt this that they are second-class citizens, that while they are free to wear the headscarf, the establishment would prefer that they do not.'

He added that many British Muslims who wear the headscarf have done 'extremely well' in education.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5125623/Books-saying-OK-beat-wife-Islamic-schools.html#ixzz500TscQny
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 

NOVEMBER 28,2016

 

H.F.1398

 
Top World News Now

November 28, 2017

 

 

United States

Trump jokes about Sen. Warren as ‘Pocahontas’ with Native American code-talkers

Warren says Trump’s use of ‘Pocahontas’ is a ‘racist slur’

Flashback: Here's the deal with Elizabeth Warren's Native American heritage

White House Weighs Personal Mobile Phone Ban for Staff

Former Intelligence Community Inspector General Charles McCullough III - Clinton campaign planned to fire me over email probe

Tillerson Drains the Swamp - Diplomats Sound the Alarm as They Are Pushed Out in Droves

MSNBC’s Joy Reid calls rural voters ‘core threat to our democracy’

John McCain Tells Clinton to 'Shut Up' and 'Get Over' Loss to Trump

Supreme Court Guts Second Amendment By Refusing To Hear Semi-Auto Ban Case

More Guns! US Army Plans to Sell Civilians 8,000 Surplus M1911 Pistols in 2018

Federal court rules military must accept transgender recruits by Jan. 1

 

 

Russia

Putin vows to defend rights of Russian Paralympic athletes at highest level

Putin urges countries to eliminate chemical weapons

Kremlin comments on Kadyrov’s remark on his ‘dream to step down’

Pentagon: 'Unprovoked' Russian fighter makes ‘dangerous’ intercept of US aircraft over Black Sea

Foreign Ministry - Moscow to continue efforts to promote national dialogue in Libya

Russia toppled from Sochi 2014 medals first place but final count unknown

About 300 Russian tourists to be evacuated from Bali volcano zone

Cameraman deported by Ukraine: "They kidnapped me and violated every conceivable standards of treatment"

Nothing personal - just business: US already supplies arms to Ukraine

‘Death to the kikes’ painted on Jewish charity office in Ukraine

Saakashvili's extradition not 'subject of discussion' between Kyiv, Tbilisi – Ukrainian ambassador in Georgia

 

 

China

Xi Jinping to skip Fortune world business leaders’ forum in Guangzhou

Premier Li proposes five initiatives to advance cooperation with CEE countries

Disgraced Chinese general Zhang Yang commits suicide

Chinese border troops hold drills in sub-zero temperatures amid tensions on Korean peninsula

Japan Warns That North Korea Set For Missile Launch In Next Few Days

North Korea Is Fortifying the Spot Where a Solider Made a Dramatic Dash to the South

Former US defence official says US could launch a trade war with China within months

China jails Taiwan activist Lee Ming-che for 'subversion'

Blogger Sentenced to 7 Years in Prison For Reporting on Toxic Spill in Vietnam

Pope’s Visit Brings to Fore Concerns of Christians in Myanmar

Number of Rohingya refugees fleeing to Bangladesh reaches 624,000: UN

 

 

United Kingdom‎           

May faces fresh accusations of 'rigging Parliament' over controversial move to block Budget amendments

Deputy PM Damian Green ‘offered Tory cash to DUP’ in bid to keep May in power after election

UK and Ireland at loggerheads over post-Brexit border and trade

UK Teenager Found Guilty of Plotting Terror Attack at Justin Bieber Concert

Saudis woo Tory MPs with lavish dinners & hotels as 20 million Yemenis starve

Donald Tusk gives UK ‘absolute deadline’ to make Brexit offer

Brexit: May to assure EU that UK will continue playing a key role in its security and warns about "destabilization" attempts coming from powers like Russia

Alex Salmond Dubbed Kremlin Agent Even Before His RT Show Launched

Secret document on realities of EU membership kept locked away from public for 30 years

 

 

European Union

Catalan politicians struggle with Spanish prison regime

Monsanto wins: Germany swings EU vote in favor of weed-killer glyphosate

Hungary’s ruling party to distribute book targeting George Soros

Seven arrested for selling bogus olive oil in Greece and abroad

Italy prepares to introduce ‘web tax’ worth €114 million a year

Fear of Flying Prevents Russian Mob Boss Extradition from Austria

Nationalist politician in Sweden forced to resign after declaring that Muslims are the opposite of humans

Surge in Migrants Creates Abysmal Conditions on Greek Islands

Thousands protest Romania's tax, justice laws

 

 

Germany

Merkel speaks out against new election

Merkel presses cautious SPD over joining new German coalition

Germany's Christmas markets open under tight security a year after attack

Germany grapples with integration after opening its borders

More than 100 reindeer dead in Norway after getting hit by freight train

Dig We Must: German Court Says OK for Coal Mine to Destroy Last Ancient Forest

It flies, and it snoops: Norway’s pricey F-35s caught sending ‘sensitive data’ to US

Merkel Offered Path to Fourth Term as Main Rivals Debate Backing

Merkel - and Davos - Rebuked in Germany

 

                    

France

Macron says glyphosate to be banned in France within three years

Porn star vs Macron: Х-rated actor lashes out at French leader for ‘demonizing’ adult films

'Bad news for Theresa May!' Macron scores new victory as Banking Authority moves to Paris

After lapses at renowned security fair, Amnesty says France provides a 'marketplace for torturers'

France to take refugees rescued from Libya who ‘need protection’

Macron tones down criticism of Poland, but concerned by its judicial reform plans

France’s ban on gender-neutral language sets off national debate

Netanyahu to Meet Macron on Lebanon Crisis

Macron says not offering Lebanon's Hariri exile

 

 

War For Global Energy Supremacy-World War III

Syria Kurds say US to ‘adjust’ weapons deliveries

Over 50,000 people isolated as US closes area around its base in Syria

Russian Defense Ministry denies air raid on Al Shafah village in Syria

Saudi-led ‘Arab NATO’ declares total war on terrorism, not particular ‘country or sect’

Mother of 3 Afghans killed by SAS paid $4,800 in ‘compensation’

Humanitarian Aid Lands In Yemen After Three-Week Saudi Blockade

Six Russian Tu-22M3 bombers hit Islamic State facilities in northeast Syria

ISIS retreating ‘deep into desert’ as Iraqi forces continue final offensive

US carries out sixth straight day of airstrikes in Somalia

 

 

Interesting Developments

Facebook to expand suicide prevention AI following successful US tests

Lockheed Martin’s Electronic Exoskeleton Enters Active Military Testing

Ex-Clinton Foundation Official Tied To Chinese Kindergarten Embroiled In Bizarre Sexual Abuse Scandal

Bali issues red alert fearing ‘imminent’ larger eruption of Mount Agung volcano

Badass NZ police recruitment video features helicopter, bagpipes & cop cat (VIDEO)

Bitcoin Tops $9,000 to Fresh Record High Amid Mainstream Investor Demand

Lockstep Nation: Facebook Alerts Users to Ideological Threat

MIT Admits: Electric Cars Are NOT Green, Pollute MORE Than Petrol Cars

Opposite Day: Study Says Outdoor LEDs Make More Light Pollution, Save No Energy

 

 

Israel

Israel vows to destroy Iranian positions within 40 km of Syrian border

Netanyahu: Those who seek to annihilate us place themselves in an existential threat

U.S. backtracks on decision to close Palestinian office in D.C.

Israel arrests Palestinians over population count

Netanyahu bashes deputy FM for saying US Jews have it easy

Abbas Orders to Freeze Contacts With Washington Over Threat to Close Palestinians' D.C. Office

Israel Gives Official Confirmation Of Covert Ties With Saudi Arabia

IDF chief - Israel ready to share intelligence on Iran with Saudi Arabia

Netanyahu’s Office: Iran, Iraq Turned Down Israel’s Aid Offer After Earthquake Devastated Border Region

New-look Labor leader vows to unseat Netanyahu in Israel

 

 

Turkey

Erdogan Does Not Rule Out Future Contacts With Assad on Syrian Kurds

Turkey builds third ‘observation spot’ inside Idlib

Erdogan says Syrian Kurdish Afrin must be cleared of ‘terrorists’

Erdogan’s chief adviser calls for Turkey’s NATO membership to be reconsidered

NATO Soldiers Could Be Invisible With New Turkish Fabric

Opposition accuses government of intention to spoil ties with NATO

NATO Drill Incident: Norway Puts Turkish Leaders On "Enemy Chart" - Hopes Turkey Will Accept Apology

Turkey may remove US radar if F-35s not delivered on schedule

Ambassador to NATO unsure if US will impose sanctions on Turkey for S-400 buy

Ankara says US case against Turkish businessman 'clear plot against Turkey'

 

 

Egypt

Egypt mosque attackers wore military uniforms and arrived in SUVs

Saudi Arabia to host first meeting of Islamic coalition against terrorism

Alwaleed Bin Talal Reportedly Hung Upside Down And Beaten By US Mercenaries

Hariri's "Unresignation" As Seen In A Bizarre Photo With The Iranian Ambassador

South Africa

Mugabe’s birthday declared a holiday in Zimbabwe

Golden handshake: Mugabe family reportedly offered $10 million payoff & legal immunity

Zimbabwe's new president Mnangagwa vows to 're-engage' with world

Mugabe’s out, Mnangagwa’s in. Is South Africa’s Zuma next?

 

Iran

Revolutionary Guard: If Europe wants to turn into a threat, we will increase the range of our missiles

Iran hits back over Saudi's prince's 'Hitler' insult to Supreme Leader

Supreme Leader Hails End of Islamic State ‘Tumor’

Supreme Leader: Iran to Help Fight against Arrogant Powers Whenever Necessary

Iran Guards ready to help rebuild Syria, Hezbollah will not disarm

New Cold War? Iran Sends Warships to Gulf of Mexico

Rouhani believes Syrian National Dialogue Congress to help draft new constitution

Foreign Minister Zarif - Riyadh 'fuels terrorists, wages war' while Tehran works on regional peace process

Death toll from earthquake in western Iran climbs to 440, over 7,000 injured

 

 

Venezuela

Maduro Regime Corruption on Display as Malaria Ravages Venezuela

Maduro: Detained Venezuelan-U.S. Citgo executives to be tried as 'traitors'

Planned Talks Between Venezuelan Opposition, Government Will Not Take Place

S&P Downgrades Venezuela To "Selective Default" After Bondholder Meeting Devolves Into Total Chaos

Maduro says Venezuela will 'never' default on its massive debt

Maduro Urges to Strengthen Political Revolutionary Organization

Evo Morales Denounces US Sanctions to Venezuelan Authorities

EU to impose arms embargo on Venezuela, lays basis for sanctions

 

 

Brazil

Argentine navy says water got in missing submarine’s snorkel and caused short circuit

Families grieve as Argentina says sound detected in search for missing submarine is consistent with non-nuclear explosion

Search For Missing Argentine Sub Continues, Navy Spokesman Not Ruling Out Survival Of Crew

A New Hope: Russia Offers Assistance in Search for Missing Argentinian Submarine

Missing Argentine Navy sub may have sent distress signals, US Navy sends help

Argentine Navy loses communication with submarine carrying crew of 44

Chile, UK, US Offer Argentina Help in Hunt for Missing Submarine

Brazil: Far-Right Presidential Hopeful Bolsonaro Outlines Platform

 

 

Mexico

Top U.S.-Backed Honduran Security Minister is Running Drugs, According to Court Testimony

Mexico Ruling Party Leans to Outside Candidate to Save Presidency

Human rights official, son killed in northern Mexico

'Abuse of Power' Found in Mexico's Mega-Projects

3 explosions rattle Popocatepetl volcano sending column of ash and gas 3 km high

Mexico Discovers Its Richest Oil Field in 15 Years

Spooked by a wave of violence from Cancun to Los Cabos, tourists scared off Mexico's beaches

Mexico loses tuna trade battle to Trump administration

 

 

Cuba

Russia's Avtovaz resumes car deliveries to Cuba after 12-year hiatus

Castro meets North Korea minister amid hope Cuba can defuse tensions

Russia delivers 280 tonnes of humanitarian aid to hurricane-hit Cuba

EU-Cuba Agreement Signals New Era in Bilateral Relations In Spite Of US Blockade

Cuba Says Cicadas Are Behind the 'Sonic Attacks' That Injured U.S. Diplomats in Havana

Cuban Officials: Alleged Sonic Attacks on US Diplomats Are 'Science Fiction'

Miguel Diaz-Canel - Next Cuban Leader - Rejects US ‘Imperialism’

Hurricane Ravaged Dominica: "It's All Gone" And Fighting For Survival

 

 

United Nations

United Nations Plan to Push Sex on Young Children is Defeated as African Nations Fight Back

At U.N., North Korea says U.S. to blame for 'worst ever situation'

Guterres - UN ready to assist response efforts following quake in Iran and Iraq

Madagascar plague outbreak - Families are refusing to hand over infectious bodies and victims are avoiding doctors

Rich Nations' Failure To Honor Pledge Scuttles Paris Agreement

UN General Assembly urges US for 26th time to end Cuba embargo

‘Sickening’: Rights groups slam WHO for appointing Zimbabwe’s Mugabe a goodwill ambassador

The U.S. Owes UNESCO Half A Billion Dollars

 

 

Japan

A 'Ghost Ship' Found in Japan May Have Been Carrying North Korean Defectors

Japan Wants To Push A Million Tons Of Radioactive Water Into The Pacific Ocean

Japan protests San Francisco's 'sex slave' statue decision

Eight Men Found Washed Ashore in Japan Say They Are North Korean

Just a Pause: Abe Says North Korea ‘Continues to Develop Its Weapons'

Japan, ASEAN leaders to discuss 'free and open' order in Manila

Just roll with it! Abe ‘falls into sand bunker’ while golfing with Trump (VIDEO)

Abe says he and Trump had good talk during golf

Trump, Abe meet amid heightened tensions with North Korea

Donald Trump greets Japan’s emperor with a nod and a handshake – but no bow

 

 

 

India

India Holds Massive Military Exercise Near Chinese Trade Chokepoint

Modi’s ruling party accused of stoking India’s culture war after man found hanged

Female Motorbike Squad To Protect Women In India’s ‘Rape Capital’

Moody's Boosts Modi: India Gets First Sovereign Credit Upgrade Since 2004

Pakistan

Law minister Zahid Hamid resigns amid deadly clashes between police, protesters

Suicide Bomber Hits Pakistan Security Convoy, Kills 5

US Says Pakistan Must Arrest Terrorist Hafiz Saeed, Freed Yesterday

Islamic schools in Pakistan plagued by sex abuse of children

 

 

Australia

Refugees Who Refused to Leave Manus Island Detention Camp Have Been Forcibly Removed

Sri Lanka arrests 22 trying to go to Australia by boat

Small tsunamis detected in New Caledonia and Vanuatu after magnitude 7 undersea quake

Indonesian Parliament Speaker Detained in Probe Into $170 Million Theft

Turnbull says government aims to legalize same-sex marriage by year-end

A giant Australian publisher scrapped a book on China's influence out of fear for Beijing's wrath

Duterte Serenades Trump: ‘You Are the Light of My World’

Turnbull meeting Trump on Asia summit sidelines

Australian activists vow to press on with pro-refugee Manus protests

‘We can’t afford war’: Duterte recommends leaving South China Sea alone, Trump offers mediation

 

 

 

 

 

 

WhatDoesItMean.Com Is One Of The Top Ranked Websites In The World For New World Order, Conspiracy Theories And Alternative News

WhatDoesItMean.Com Privacy Policy And About Information   

Join Sorcha Faal’s Mailing List

 

 

 

  

 

Conspiracy: Comes from Latin word 'conspirare' meaning to breathe together; conspiracy theories emphasize the invisible forces and actions (of selfish harmful intent by special interests) behind the visible historical events.

 

NOVEMBER 28, 2017

 

H.F.1400

 
 

A RETURN OF A MUSLIM EXODUS TO  EUROPE AND BEYOND-A CHRISTIAN FAITH VOID IN THE WESTERN WORLD IS NOW BEING FILLED BY MECCA, AND THAT POWER COULD RULE THE EARTH?]

 

 

 

 

Muslim population in parts of Europe could TRIPLE by 2050: New study predicts migration and birth rates will lead to dramatic rise in numbers across continent

  • Muslims making up total population of Britain could rise from 6.3 to 17.2 per cent
  • As of 2016, the UK's share of Muslims was recorded at 6.3 per cent of the country
  • Muslims average 13 years younger than other Europeans and have high birth rate

THE Muslim population in parts of Europe - including Britain - could triple by 2050, researchers say.

Figures in a new report suggest a stark east-west divide, with the Muslim share of the UK's population rising from 6.3 per cent in 2016 to 16.7 per cent in one scenario.

The study by the Pew Research Centre concludes that Europe's Muslim population would continue to grow over the next several decades even if immigration to the continent were halted.

Under the 'zero migration' scenario, Muslims would make up 7.4 per cent of Europe's population by 2050 compared to the 4.9 per cent they comprised last year. 

Researchers say that's mostly because the birthrate for Muslims is generally higher than for other Europeans. 

Countries including Belgium, France and Italy will see the biggest change in the 'zero migration' scenario because they have young Muslim populations. 

As of 2016, the UK's share of Muslims was recorded as 6.3 per cent, around 4.1 million people. In Europe, the total was 4.9 per cent, around 24.9 million.

In the medium migration scenario - perhaps the most likely - the UK's Muslim population would rise from 6.3 per cent to 16.7 per cent - around 13 million. 

 

The Muslim population could triple in some European countries by 2050, with the UK projected to see one of the most rapid rises throughout the continent

 

Under the 'zero migration' scenario, an estimated 30 million Muslims would make up 7.4 per cent of Europe's population by 2050 

The lowest estimate has the share rising to 9.7 per cent, and the highest 17.2 per cent. 

Experts at Pew Research Centre, in Washington, USA, modeled three scenarios for estimating the number of Muslims who would be living in Europe by 2050.

All three used a mid-2016 estimate of 25.8 million as a baseline, but assumed different future migration rates.

Under the 'zero migration' scenario, an estimated 30 million Muslims would make up 7.4 per cent of Europe's population by 2050 compared to the 4.9 percent they comprised last year.

The researchers said that is mostly because Muslims are on average 13 years younger than other Europeans and also have a higher birthrate.

The study estimates 58.8 million Muslims would account for 11.2 per cent of the population in a 'medium migration' scenario that has migration maintaining a 'regular speed'.

In the 'high migration' scenario, the study projects that the record flow of migrants who came to Europe between 2015 and 2016 would continue indefinitely, resulting in 75 million Muslims in Europe, a 14 per cent increase, by the middle of the century.

 

Muslims are seen offering Eid al-Adha prayers in a convention centre in Marseille, southern France

 

Demonstrators display signs with crossed mosques during a protest in front of a mosque in Berlin, Germany

EU pledges £39bn to limit mass migration from Africa to Europe 

 

Jean-Claude Juncker (pictured), the European Commission president

The European Union has pledged £39billion to Africa by 2022 amid reports of slave trading in Libya.

Jean-Claude Juncker, the European Commission president, said the best way to tackle mass migration out of Africa was to rebuild the continent's economy. 

Libya agreed with key EU and African leaders to allow up to 20,000 migrants facing abuse in detention camps to be evacuated within days or weeks.

The decision was taken after Ivory Coast President Alassane Ouattara called for 'all urgent measures' to end slave trading and other migrant abuses in Libya at an EU-Africa summit in Abidjan, the capital city of the Ivory Coast. 

The summit comes just two weeks after US network CNN aired footage of black Africans sold as slaves in Libya, sparking outrage from political leaders and street protests in African and European capitals. 

African Union, European Union and United Nations officials at the meeting offered increased support for the International Organisation of Migration 'to help with the return of the Africans who want it to their home countries'.

Even with the most immigration, Muslims would 'still be considerably smaller than the populations of both Christians and people with no religion in Europe,' the researchers concluded.

Muslim immigrants have been a politically sensitive topic in Europe following the influx of newcomers in 2015 and 2016.

Some countries have seen backlashes that have included populist parties campaigning on anti-Islam messages.

The study was based on census and survey data, population registers, immigration data and other sources.

The 30 countries it covered include the 28 European Union members, plus Norway and Switzerland.

Not all countries would be affected evenly by future immigration, according to the Pew report.

In the high migration scenario, Germany and Sweden would have the biggest increases because both countries took in the most asylum-seekers during the height of the refugee crisis two years ago.

While Muslims made up six per cent of Germany's population last year, their proportion would go up to 20 percent by 2050.

Sweden's Muslims, who were at eight per cent in 2016, would account for 31 per cent of the population in that same scenario.

Meanwhile, some countries that had comparatively few Muslim residents in 2016 would continue to have few by 2050 in all three scenarios.

 

Muslims pray in the street for Friday prayer in Paris. Thousands of faithful pray each Friday in the Paris streets due to the lack of mosques



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5130617/Study-Europes-Muslim-population-grow-migration-not.html#ixzz50O5eWcEO

Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

H.F.1403

 

 
'WE MUST PUT GUILTY [BANKSTERS]

IN THE DOCK.'

 

[THE TRUTH IS AS AN INDEPENDENT STATE

THE CITY MILE APPEARS UNTOUCHABLE.]

 

He has chronicled every financial crisis to hit the UK: Now the most respected historian in the City says...‘We must put guilty bankers in the dock’

Storm brewing: Even from the home counties David Kynaston's anxiety about the lack of accountability in British banking looks highly relevant

Storm brewing: Even from the home counties David Kynaston's anxiety about the lack of accountability in British banking looks highly relevant

Sitting at his kitchen table, sipping from a mug of instant coffee, author David Kynaston has something on his mind.

Why is it, some ten years after the leak in the financial system sprung at Northern Rock, that the taxpayer never had a proper account of what went wrong?

‘It’s not too late for a judge-led tribunal of inquiry,’ Kynaston says.

‘We’ve got the Bloody Sunday inquiry as a precedent. The financial crisis was something so major and a continues to have such consequences. Rather like South Africa after apartheid, there is a case for knowing who the guilty men are and getting some kind of closure and learning some lessons.’

It’s a strong view from a man who comes across as mild-mannered. But he knows, almost better than anyone else, how crucial getting answers should be.

When former governor Lord King wanted to commission a popular history of the Bank of England, he turned to Kynaston. The 66-year-old historian has written several painstaking volumes on the City’s history, as well as books on the London Stock Exchange and HSBC, and he has also won enormous plaudits for his unsurpassed three-volume (so far) social history of modern Britain.

Unlike many great historians, Kynaston has not buried himself in an ivory tower at one of the top universities but beavers away from his modest suburban home in Surrey.

But even from the home counties his anxiety about the lack of accountability in British banking looks highly relevant, as a group of shareholders battles in the High Court with Lloyds Bank over compensation for the shotgun marriage with HBOS at the height of the crisis. The Government has been making it as hard as possible for the Court to access official witnesses and documents on the grounds that it might compromise the civil service.

Meanwhile, businesses which were damaged by Royal Bank of Scotland in the aftermath of the crisis, and by Lloyds as a result of fraud at HBOS’s Reading branch, are also fighting for redress.

Kynaston had hoped that after the crisis there would be some kind of ‘audit of the financial system’. That would have allowed policymakers to understand better which parts added economic value and which didn’t.

‘It would have been helpful, because it’s my impression that it’s still a somewhat unreformed system,’ he says.

During the course of writing his mammoth 879-page history of the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street, covering a period from its foundation in 1694 until 2013, Kynaston was granted full access to its sometimes patchy and unhelpful archives. But when it came to the financial crisis, many of the documents remained sealed because of a 20-year secrecy rule, although he did have access to many of the main players, including Lord King.

As we already know, Lord King’s version of the crisis and that of then prime minister Gordon Brown, delivered at a recent conference to commemorate two decades of the Bank’s independence, are sharply different.

Kynaston’s cynical view of the failure to dig into the origins of the crisis is that it is about politics, and the Tories have been reluctant to take on its own supporters in the financial community who, incidentally, are big contributors to the nation’s tax base.

But as a historian he believes longer-term forces are in play.

The 1970s saw the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates break down, and for Britain this culminated in Black Wednesday a quarter of a century ago when the UK was ejected from the Exchange Rate Mechanism.

The Bank of England also has changed dramatically with the times. Kynaston says: ‘The intellectual calibre of the Bank is way ahead of what it was 30 or 40 years ago. It went up to another level under Mervyn King. It’s become a place where very bright young people are happy to spend time.’

The heart of the narrative of the modern Bank uncovered by Kynaston deals with the lead up to independence in 1997.

The pressure for cutting the Old Lady free from the Government began with Lord Lawson’s resignation speech in 1989, he says.

Documents seen by Kynaston suggest Eddie George, the then governor, had ‘long been wanting monetary policy independence and it was a great prize. But once he knew supervision was going, he wasn’t sure he was happy with the bargain’.

The most influential governor before the Bank won independence was Montague Norman, whose portrait still hangs in the governor’s office today. ‘He was governor for 24 years which is twice as long as anyone else. He had a strong sense of public duty.’ In Kynaston’s view, Norman’s greatest moment – and also his undoing – was the financial reconstruction after the First World War.

He wanted the City and Britain to restore the hegemony it had enjoyed up to 1914.

This led him to embrace the gold standard and he persuaded then-chancellor Winston Churchill that it was the right thing to do.

It proved disastrous for the British economy – a prelude to union strife, economic stagnation and job losses which fed into the narrative of the Great Depression.

When Norman was finally ‘torn away from the job’ in 1944, the favourite to take charge was the governor of Canadian Central Bank Graham Towers – but his candidacy fell by the wayside because of establishment objections.

Britain would have to wait until 2013 to finally hand control of that British institution to a Canadian – Mark Carney, a former Goldman Sachs banker armed with an Oxford PhD, who was seen as the right candidate to repair Britain’s contaminated financial system.

  • Till Time’s Last Stand. A History of the Bank of England 1694-2013, by David Kynaston.


Read more: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-5133683/Historian-David-Kynaston-wants-guilty-bankers-dock.html#ixzz50PNQNGv2
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

The Crown Corporation Controls Inner City London | Independence

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1404

 
 

 

Why pompous Milburn is so wrong about Britain's haves and have nots.... - Daily Mail

 

DECEMBER 4,2017

 

DOMINIC LAWSON: Why pompous Milburn is so wrong about Britain's haves and have nots

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5142221/Why-Milburn-wrong-Britains-haves-nots.html#ixzz50TZeZZNP
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

Jumped before he was pushed: Alan Milburn presented his departure as 'social mobility tsar' as a resignation on a matter of principle despite the fact his term had come to an end

How strange it is that Alan Milburn should routinely have been described as the Government's 'social mobility tsar', a grandiose title to which he never objected.

After all, the Russian tsar was the apex of a system of absolute social hierarchy. Now our social mobility 'tsar' has abdicated, protesting that the Government is doing nothing to bring about the more equal country that the Social Mobility Commission was designed to support.

In fact Milburn's abdication is no more voluntary than that of Tsar Nicholas II, 100 years ago. As Justine Greening, the Education Secretary, pointed out yesterday, he'd been doing the job for five years 'and his term had come to an end'.

In other words, Milburn jumped before he was pushed, and presented it as a resignation on a matter of principle.

In one respect, Milburn really did enjoy the status of a tsar: his pronouncements as chairman of the Social Mobility Commission were always accorded complete reverence — not least on the BBC — and were never subjected to any sort of critical review.

When this quango was launched in 2012 by the then coalition top team of David Cameron and Nick Clegg (largely, I suspect, because both men were embarrassed by their own exclusively private education and wealthy backgrounds), Milburn declared: 'We live in a country, where, invariably, if you're born poor, you die poor.'

He repeated this on many occasions — and was never challenged on it by his many TV and radio interviewers.

But it is — and was — completely untrue. Even the Sutton Trust, an organisation dedicated to the cause of increasing the life-chances of the less well-off, has produced research completely refuting Milburn's central proposition.

Feared

Its most recent analysis, dividing society into quartiles by income, revealed that 62 per cent of sons born to fathers in the bottom income quartile, themselves escaped into the higher three quartiles.

 

Education Secretary Justine Greening pointed out on the Andrew Marr show that Alan Milburn jumped before he was pushed from the role

Moreover, as you would expect, there was social movement (as defined by income) in the opposite direction.

Only 42 per cent of sons born to fathers from the top income bracket managed to retain that position in the highest income quartile — and 16 per cent of those born in the top income category slid all the way to the bottom.

So why did Milburn get away with it? Well, the Conservatives didn't dare criticise him because they feared — especially under David Cameron — that they would be seen as defending 'elitism'. And for Labour, Milburn's position was pleasantly in accord with their own claim that only a Labour government would represent 'the many, not the few'.

Funnily enough, it is within the Labour party — of which the former Cabinet minister Milburn is still a member — that there has been an actual retreat in working-class success.

In 1964, 37 per cent of Labour MPs were from a family background of manual work; by 2015 that figure had plunged to just 7 per cent.

 

David Cameron's government dare not criticise Milburn because they feared that they would be seen as defending 'elitism'

This process is even accentuated by its current leader, Jeremy Corbyn, as the resoundingly middle-class socialist pressure group Momentum tightens its hold on the selection process.

Ludicrous

On Saturday, the Mail reported 'Labour insiders' as saying that the son of a miner, Kieran Harpham, had been de-selected as a Sheffield councillor because he was 'too authentically working-class' and 'not Left-wing enough': he has been replaced by Janet Ridler, a historian from Sheffield's wealthiest suburb, Dore.

To be fair to Alan Milburn, he is far from a Corbyn fan. He is, to the contrary, a Blairite. And, echoing his former boss, Milburn presented Brexit as a curse on British society, which must somehow be lifted. 'Tough on Brexit, tough on the causes of Brexit,' was Milburn's ludicrous slogan yesterday — which is as much as to say that he thinks the British people's decision to leave the EU was nothing less than a crime.

He went on to argue, confusingly, that if Theresa May didn't do what he said about social mobility, she would be 'betraying the families who voted for Brexit'.

His claim, such as it is, seems to be that those who voted to leave the EU did so as a protest against the nation's lack of social mobility, and its alleged adverse effect on their living standards.

It is an assertion both presumptuous and pompous, based on no evidence. If anything, the pro-Brexit vote in the Labour heartlands was one in favour of greater social cohesion, and against the form of mobility defined by the EU's absolute guarantee of freedom of movement.

 

Milburn's ludicrous 'tough on Brexit, tough on the causes of Brexit,' slogan suggests that he thinks the British people's decision to leave the EU is nothing less than a crime

The consequent unchecked level of immigration into the UK had many benefits, but the influx of millions of Europeans to work in this country also had a depressing effect on the wages of the unskilled. Such voters would, more likely, argue that the only way Mrs May could 'betray' them over Brexit would be to do what Mr Milburn wants and keep Britain inside the Single Market (which mandates freedom of movement).

But what is it, above anything else, which enables those from less well-off homes to have a chance of prosperity? A first-class quality of free education and the prospect of regular employment at the end of it. By both these measures, Britain has actually been upping its game — and it has nothing to do with Mr Milburn's Social Mobility Commission.

Employment rates have been rising, for year after year, and the proportion of families without anyone in paid work has (thankfully) gone in the opposite direction — down. The latter has much to do with the benefit reforms pioneered by Iain Duncan Smith.

His colleague, Michael Gove, was also instrumental, as Education Secretary, in driving up standards in state schools by demanding a greater level of rigour in both teaching and examinations.

The result of this has been a narrowing of the quality gap — and public exam outcomes — between state schools and private schools.

Again, this was no thanks to the Social Mobility Commission. It had nothing useful to say about improving the standards of teaching, and instead advocated lowering standards of entry at our top universities to those from the poorest homes. What a counsel of despair.

Of course we are an unequal society. As are all societies in all nations, always. But despite the self-serving cliches of the Left, last year in the UK income inequality — defined as the gap between the earnings of the richest and the poorest — fell to its lowest level since 1986.

Benefit reforms pioneered by Iain Duncan Smith, left, and the drive to improve standards in state schools by his colleague Michael Gove had nothing to do with Mr Milburn's Social Mobility Commission

And, as the Chancellor Philip Hammond pointed out in his Budget speech a fortnight ago, since 2010 the incomes of the poorest 10 per cent have grown faster, proportionately, than the richest 10 per cent.

Obsessed

It's true that we are in a long period of earnings stagnation: but this applies across the developed world. And it is simply not the case that Britain is at the bottom of the international league table in terms of social mobility.

We are probably more obsessed with class than any other nation, and accent still plays too much of a role in the way we treat each other.

But as Peter Saunders, emeritus professor of sociology at Sussex University explained in his recent Civitas pamphlet, Social Mobility Delusions: 'Social mobility is the norm in Britain, not the exception, and it covers the range from top to bottom. Politicians say our social mobility rate is one of the lowest in the Western world, but studies of class mobility put Britain around the middle of the international rankings.

'The chances of moving into a different class than the one you were born into are less than in Sweden, the U.S. and Australia, but better than in Germany, France or Italy.'

So do we actually need a quango called the Social Mobility Commission?

We can certainly do without another social mobility 'tsar'.

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 4-2017

H .F. 1405

 
 
 
 
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 
 

The number of Muslims in Europe reaches

44 MILLION

 

 

[MUSLIM POPULATION

 WITHIN EACH PARTICULAR

ONCE FREE NATION STATE

 WITHIN THE EU]

 

WHERE THEY LIVE
 

 Germany---       4,760,000--------------5.8per cent

 France--------     4,710,000-------------7.5 per cent

 Britain--------      2,960,000-------------4.6per cent

Italy--------------2,220,000-------------7per cent   

 Bulgaria-----------1,020,000-----------13.7per cent

 Netherlands------1,000,000-------------6.0percent

 Spain--------------980,000--------------2.3percent

 Belgium-----------630,000-------------5.9 percent

 Greece-------------610,000--------------5.3percent

 Austria------------450,000--------------5.4percent

by

Ian Drury- 

Daily Mail

Home Affairs Correspondent

*  *  *

 

   [ The above figures are no doubt an estimate of each nation 's Muslim population therefore there could be millions more at any one time. Our own government has admitted it does not know the full number, as  those who should have left the country are still here, and others over the years have melted into the population. We also know from experience over the years from those at No 10 are not very good at simple Arithmetic!- when it suits them!]

[WITH THE BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 THE MUSLIM POPULATION IN ENGLAND WILL GROW TO SURPASS THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION IN A MATTER OF A FEW GENERATIONS AND THEN THEY WILL HAVE THEIR ISLAMIC STATE WITH ITS STRICT SHARIA LAW AND SEEING HOW THE MAJORITY OF THE MUSLIMS IN OUR COUNTRY HAVE REACTED TO THE MASSACRE IN FRANCE THERE WILL BE NO TOLERANCE OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM WHICH WE HAVE GIVEN THEM. OF COURSE THERE ARE MANY MUSLIMS WHO DECRY THE SILENCE OF THE MAJORITY OF MUSLIMS BUT UNTIL THE GREATER MAJORITY BECOME THE NORM THERE WILL BE NO LIKELIHOOD OF THEIR INTEGRATION INTO OUR SOCIETY.

THE MAJOR FAULT FOR THE SITUATION WE SEE BEFORE US IN THE MIDDLE EAST IS BECAUSE OF THE WEST'S-[USA-UK-FRANCE] HISTORY OF EXPLOITATION IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES IN REGARD TO OIL SUPPLIES OVER THE PAST 97 YEARS AND INTERFERENCE IN THE AFFAIRS OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES WHICH HAS BROUGHT MANY ILLEGAL WARS WITH GREAT SLAUGHTER AND DEVASTATION TO THEIR POPULATIONS.

THE IRISH QUESTION IS A YARD STICK TO SEE HOW LONG INJUSTICE TO A PEOPLE CAN HAVE DIRE CONSEQUENCES EVEN TODAY IN NOVEMBER 2015. IRONICALLY IT WAS THE WAR MONGER TONY BLAIR WHO FOUND THE SOLUTION WHICH BROUGHT PEACE HOWEVER FRAGILE.  BUT HE FAILED TO LEARN FROM HISTORY ABOUT THE INTERFERENCE IN THE MATTERS OF OTHER NATION STATES -PARTICULARLY MUSLIM-A PEOPLE DEDICATED TO THEIR RELIGION ISLAM-THOUGH THEY HAVE DIFFERENT SECTS OF FOLLOWERS ,WHO HAVE YEARNED TO BE THEMSELVES!

WE BELIEVE THAT THE ANSWER TO THE FLOOD OF REFUGEES  FROM ITS OUTSET SHOULD HAVE BEEN TO KEEP THE REFUGEES IN THE MIDDLE EAST -SAUDI ARABIA-HAS TENTED AREA TO ACCEPT 3,000,000 -EGYPT-JORDON...WITH MASSIVE FINANCIAL  HELP AND SHELTER ETC OFFERED TO THOSE COUNTRIES UNSTINTINGLY BUT ALLOW A CONTROLLED FLOW OF WAR REFUGEES TO THOSE COUNTRIES WILLING TO TAKE THEM-_BUT NO COMPULSION SHOULD BE MADE. IN THIS WAY THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED THE CATASTROPHE WE SEE BEFORE US IN EUROPE.

 

*

 

  1. The number of Muslims in Europe reaches

     

    44million -

     

     

    Daily Mail

    13 hours ago ... The number of Muslims in Europe reaches 44m: Serious concerns raised about
    the ... By Ian Drury Home Affairs Correspondent For The Daily Mail ... By contrast,
    the UK has about 2.9million Muslims – the third largest number.

     

     

     
     

     

 

 

IT IS SAID THAT A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS. THE ABOVE MUST SURELY BE WORTH A BILLION?

 

 

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

NOVEMBER 16-2015

 

 

H F 550

 
 

A to Z of politically correct madness: The Left's 'Thought Police' continues to censor language as 'manfully' is labelled sexist

  • NHS hospital consultant accused of sexism after praising a father 
  • Cambridge academic urged colleagues not to use words such as ‘genius’
  • Suffolk council has been criticised for using the term 'cat's eyes'
  • Here is an A to Z of new practices which have fallen foul to political correctness 

Every day, it seems, someone else falls foul of the New Censors. They are accused of either offending the diktats of political correctness or are deemed guilty of so-called cultural appropriation (the act of using things from another culture).

The latest example this week was a ‘sin’ committed against the all-pervasive modern creed behind ‘gender politics’, which dictates that anyone who uses language deemed ‘sexist’ must be punished and forced to apologise.

An NHS hospital consultant was accused of sexism after praising a father for ‘manfully’ stepping in to bring his daughter for an appointment when his wife was unavailable.

The three-year-old’s parents complained, saying the word ‘manfully’ was sexist because it implied ‘women are there to do the childcare’ and that ‘fathers and mothers should have equal responsibility for taking their children to hospital appointments’.

The Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, which runs the hospital, and the paediatric surgeon involved had to apologise.

Another example of truly absurd censorship occurred when county council road engineers in Suffolk were criticised for using the phrase ‘cat’s eyes’ — because some people may have thought cats had been butchered, and thus the council was party to animal cruelty.

Among the most dangerous New Censors are those found in universities — not only politically over-sensitive students but lecturers wedded to this Left-wing ideology.

For example, a woman Cambridge academic urged colleagues not to use words such as ‘genius’, ‘brilliant’ or ‘flair’ for fear of alienating female students because she said they ‘carry assumptions of gender inequality’ as they’re associated with men.

Such examples show how political correctness has become an obsession in many sections of the metropolitan, liberal Left. A self-appointed priesthood now ruthlessly polices language and behaviour for any signs of heresy that their diktats state are unacceptable.

They have established a code of conduct against ‘crimes’ such as so-called ‘micro-aggressions’ — ‘brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioural and environmental indignities’ that are said to communicate hostility.

But far from promoting a tolerant society — which is their proclaimed aim — this bullying brand of identity politics simply creates friction between people, as well as discord and suspicion.

Crucially, it silences debate — and free speech is undermined and common sense lost.

Here’s an A to Z compilation of some everyday words, practices and concepts that have fallen foul of the new Political Correctness orthodoxy.

A is for avoiding eye contact

Oxford University’s Equality and Diversity Unit tried to accuse people who avoid eye contact with others of ‘racist micro-aggression’ — before it was pointed out that such advice might be seen as discriminatory against people with autism who may struggle to look others in the eye.

B is for ‘born a man’ or ‘born a woman’

Transgender campaigners condemn such phrases as inaccurate and offensive. Even ‘biologically male’ and ‘biologically female’ are deemed ‘problematic’ by the influential U.S. gay rights ‘media monitoring’ group GLAAD (which used to be called the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, because they ‘oversimplify’ the ‘complex subject’ of gender. We’re told the correct usage is to say an individual is ‘assigned’ or ‘designated’ male or female at birth.

C is for cat’s eyes

Suffolk County Council stopped using traditional signs warning drivers ‘Cat’s eyes removed’ after fears that real cats may have been killed to manufacture these reflective road safety measures.

Ipswich resident Rebecca Brewer was reported as saying: ‘I have a five-year-old daughter who was very upset the first time she saw the sign — she really thought cruel people were torturing cats.’

Instead, signs across the county now state: ‘Caution, road studs removed.’

A council spokesman said: ‘The term “road studs” is one we now use as standard.’

C is also for clapping

Applause was banned by the National Union of Students’ Women’s Campaign over concerns that it could ‘trigger anxiety’ among nervous students. Whooping and cheering have also raised concerns. Instead, politically-correct students now show support for a speaker with a bizarre display of ‘jazz hands’, a form of exuberant but silent manual acclamation taken from musical theatre.

D is for dreadlocks

Use of this braided hairstyle by white people is said to represent cultural appropriation. When the designer Marc Jacobs was criticised for using a group of predominantly white models wearing dreadlocks in a show, he argued — not unreasonably — that this was similar to black women straightening their hair. This was met with further outrage from (mostly white) commentators who complained that hair-straightening had been ‘forced upon the black community due to beauty ideals based on white archetypes’.

E is for ‘Exotic’

A word some social justice warriors claim carries ‘nasty racial underpinnings’. U.S. fashion editor and blogger Katie Dupere says ‘exotic’ is ‘a major verbal micro-aggression’.

F is for ‘Fat’

An unacceptable term, which, according to so-called ‘fat-liberation activists, is used ‘to shame people who might not fit the conventional beauty standards of our society’. Contradictorily, though, anyone with a fuller figure is allowed to ‘reclaim “Fat” as an empowering identity’.

F is also for ‘forefathers’

A word that Cardiff Metropolitan University’s code of practice states is sexist (because it includes the gender-exclusive ‘fathers’) and should be replaced by ‘ancestors’ or ‘forebears’. The code lists 34 words and phrases to be avoided as part of efforts to ‘embrace cultural diversity’.

G is for ‘girls’

A sexist word according to Cardiff Metropolitan University, which said that it should never be used about adult women, as it is a way of belittling them.

G is also for ‘genius’

one of the words that Lucy Delap, a lecturer in British history at Cambridge, says should be discouraged as it ‘carries assumptions of gender inequality and also of class and ethnicity’.

H is for Hate Speech

Any view that departs from the social justice agenda is at risk of being seen as ‘hate speech’. Home Secretary Amber Rudd’s speech to last year’s Tory party conference was reported to police as a ‘hate crime’ by Left-wing Oxford professor Joshua Silver.

The speech — which the academic later admitted he hadn’t actually watched — had included promises of tighter controls on immigration.

Credulous police duly recorded Rudd’s speech as ‘a non-crime hate incident’.

I is for ‘Illegal’

This is apparently a pejorative word and therefore unacceptable when applied to migrants — even to describe those who have, indeed, entered a country illegally. One set of guidelines in the U.S. states: ‘Actions are illegal, people are not . . . The word ‘illegal’ has been applied and abused by those advocating harsh immigration policies that are undoubtedly racist and xenophobic.’ The politically correct terminology is ‘undocumented immigrants’.

J is for Jamaican Stew

This traditional Caribbean dish became a recipe for a race row when chefs at Pembroke College, Cambridge, were ordered to rethink the menu after ethnic minority students complained that the ‘Jamaican Stew’ — as well as other dishes including ‘Tunisian Rice’ — constituted ‘micro-aggressions’ against them, since such offerings did not properly represent the foods of their native lands.

K is for Kilts

Some Scots have suggested any non-Scot who wears one is guilty of cultural appropriation — particularly considering England’s long history of ‘oppression’ against its northern neighbour.

‘Scottish Gaelic culture has been subject to rampant cultural appropriation for centuries as a result of its subordination to Anglophone culture in an Anglo-centric British Empire,’ laments Michael Newton, author of Warriors Of The Word: The World Of The Scottish Highlanders.

L is for ‘Lame’

A word deemed offensive by some disability campaigners, particularly when used in the sense of being ‘ineffectual’ or ‘unappealing’. According to the ‘Ableist Word Profile’ (an online guide that ‘explores a variety of feminist issues through a disability lens’), use of the word ‘lame’ is ‘pejorative’ as it ‘reinforces ableism in our culture by reminding people that disability is bad’.

M is for ‘mother’ (AND ‘MANFULLY’)

Mother is a word that’s far too old-fashioned in our modern world where there is sensitivity about transgenderism.

In January, the British Medical Association advised members that mothers-to-be should be referred to as ‘pregnant people’ to avoid offence and ‘celebrate diversity’.

Another previously innocuous M-word frowned upon by the PC brigade is ‘man’: censors at Cardiff Metropolitan University have stipulated that ‘manpower’ should be replaced by ‘personnel’, ‘human resources’ or ‘staff’ to avoid offence to women. ‘Sportsmanship’ and ‘taxman’ should not be used, either.

 

N is for Native American headdress

Another victim of the cultural appropriation police. Singer Ellie Goulding was accused of racism after tweeting a picture of herself wearing one. ‘Don’t mock a dying race, you insensitive and ignorant excuse of a person,’ screeched one virtue-signalling critic.

David Beckham’s son Brooklyn was the target of similar howls of PC anger over his tattoo of a Native American Indian. Actor Colin Firth’s wife Livia faced online abuse for wearing a Native American headdress at the Isle of Wight Festival.

O is for ‘Land of Opportunity’

This phrase — often used to refer to America — is said to constitute verbal micro-aggression because it ‘asserts that race or gender does not play a role in life’s successes’.

P is for party costumes

LAST year, a senior professor at a college at Yale University had to resign after he and his wife were accused of downplaying concerns over ‘inappropriate’ Halloween costumes. He was accused of ‘creating space for violence’ and of trivialising students’ concerns because he suggested people could turn away if they felt offended by students in ‘culturally inappropriate’ fancy dress such as Mexican or Native American outfits.

P is also for pronouns

Sussex University Students’ Union warned members against using the pronouns ‘he’ and ‘she’ to avoid assumptions about identity. ‘They’ and ‘Them’ are said to be the correct, gender-neutral terms.

Q is for queens

Drag queens were banned from a Gay Pride event in Glasgow in 2015 in case they caused offence to transgender people.

R is for ‘real men’ and ‘real women’

Jenni Murray, presenter of Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour, upset transgender lobbyists when she said men who had undergone sex-change operations could not claim to be ‘real women’ since they did not have ‘the experience of growing up female’.

S is for Sombreros

The Students’ Union at the University of East Anglia in Norwich banned a local Mexican-themed restaurant (Pedro’s Tex Mex Cantina) from handing out sombreros to students in 2015 as part of a marketing drive. Union officials claimed the hats breached a policy forbidding stall-holders from handing out materials including ‘discriminatory or stereotypical imagery’.

S is also for ‘sensitivity readers’ increasingly employed by publishers to check manuscripts for ‘racist, sexist or otherwise offensive content’.

T is for ‘trigger’

This refers to anything the hyper-sensitive might find upsetting. Universities now widely use ‘trigger warnings’ to advise students that something may cause them distress.

This kind of alarmism even extends to classic literature such as F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel The Great Gatsby, which is said to feature ‘gory, abusive and misogynistic violence’. Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway needs to be treated with caution because of the ‘suicidal inclinations’ in the text — a warning that would rather ruin the book if you have never read it.

T is also for ‘twerking’

THE provocative, rump-grinding dance style which singer Miley Cyrus has been accused of culturally appropriating from black musicians. Lily Allen, too, has been criticised for using black women dancers twerking in a pop video — ironic, as she sees herself as a cheerleader for right-on behaviour.

U is for Uniforms

In an attempt to appease the transgender lobby, some police forces are scrapping traditional men’s and women’s uniforms. In response to its ‘Gender Identity Working Group’, Dyfed Powys constabulary in Wales switched to ‘gender-neutral’ outfits, including a unisex hat and neckwear.

‘We have learnt there may have been times when practices and procedures have adversely impacted our trans communities and their engagement with us,’ said Dyfed Assistant Chief Constable Liane James.

Northamptonshire Police now issues U.S.-style baseball caps which they think will somehow encourage transgender recruits.

V is for ‘violate’

A lecturer at Harvard Law School (whose alumni include Barack Obama) was urged by a student not to use this word — as in the phrase ‘does this conduct violate the law?’ — as it might trigger traumatic fears about rape.

It was even suggested that rape law should not be taught to protect students from ‘distress’.

W is for ‘Where are you from?’

Even the most innocent verbal exchange can become a minefield. Guidance from the University of California, Berkeley, has decreed that asking ‘where are you from?’ or ‘where were you born?’ could be racist micro-aggression — because the phrases are ‘a covert way to say you don’t belong here’.

X is for X Factor

On the ITV talent show last year, Saara Aalto from Finland was accused of cultural appropriation for dressing in a Japanese kimono and a long wig, like a geisha. With the pious relish that typifies Twitter comments, one viewer said: ‘I found Saara’s performance very offensive. A culture is not a dress up costume.’

Y is for Yoga

Another victim of the appropriation puritans: in 2015, the Student Federation of the University of Ottawa banned yoga sessions. The teacher was told it amounted to Western ‘cultural appropriation’ of a practice with its origins in Indian Hinduism. She was told: ‘There are cultural issues involved in the practice’ because of ‘oppression, cultural genocide and diasporas due to colonialism and western supremacy’.

Z is for Zero Tolerance

Defined by the Cambridge Dictionary as the ‘act of punishing all criminal or unacceptable behaviour severely, even if it is not very serious’.

It is the key policy of many lobby groups in their drive to outlaw language and behaviour they decree insensitive. The ultimate irony is that in the name of tolerance for minorities, all concept of essential and hard-won freedoms enjoyed by the majority are in danger of being lost.

The most important of these losses is, of course, freedom of expression.

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5094791/A-Z-politically-correct-madness.html#ixzz51tOnzdTK
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

H.F.1421

 
 

SO WILL BRITAIN ONE DAY BE  MUSLIM?

by

Ruth Dudley Edwards

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

*

Our failure to have children.

Welfarism.

Political Correctness.

And a

LACK of WILL

 to fight Islamic extremism

 

 

 

THIS WEEK has been another terrible one for those of us who want a society in which all races, religions and cultures mix to their mutual advantage and

ENRICHMENT.

On Tuesday, five men were sentenced to life in prison for plotting to use a huge fertiliser bomb in what would have been the UK's largest mass murder.

Omar Khyam, Salahuddin Amin, Anthony Garciaand Jawa Akbar -first and second generation immigrants - responded to the tolerance of the British people

BY TRYING TO KILL AS MANY OF THEM AS POSSIBLE.

It is absurd to hope that the exposure of their evil after a 13-month trial which cost an estimated

£50,000,000

-has finally provided the wake-up call that this slumbering country so badly needs?

I'm one of those old-fashioned immigrants to this country who feels passionately grateful, is proudly British (as well as Irish -having been born in Dublin) and believes that immigrants have more duties than rights. And further, that one of those is to adjust to British society rather than expecting it to adjust to them. [ has been the practice for some decades but more so during the Blair years.]

However, one aspect of contemporary British society which I refuse to adjust to is its weakness in the face of the

ENEMY WITHIN

In my many conversations with like-minded people about the threat that radical Islam poses to the

 BRITISH WAY OF LIFE

-And indeed, to European civilisation -we frequently end by despairingly agreeing that the

WEST

-seems intention committing

POLITICAL and CULTURAL

SUICIDE.

When we look starkly at the demographic statistics, the wimpishness of our

ESTABLISHMENT

-in the face of the

THREAT

-the perversions perpetuated by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-and our passivity, it's hard to avoid the

CONCLUSION

-that within a couple of generations

ISLAM

-will be in

CONTROL of EUROPE

And before anyone says that there nothing wrong if this happened, since the vast majority of

MUSLIMS

are tolerant people who would not dream of interfering with

OUR WAY OF LIFE

-it's necessary  to point out that in

MUSLIM COUNTRIES

, it's usually the radicals and extremists

MULLAHS

-who regard

TOLERANCE

AS A VICE

-WHO MAKE THE RUNNING.

This occurs too in microcosm in

MUSLIM GHETTOS

around

EUROPE

We saw the frightening fundamentalist fringe of

ISLAM

-marching, threatening and perpetuating violence over the cartoons depicting

MOHAMMAD

IN

DENMARK

while the majority of Muslims - who, yes, of course are tolerant and decent - kept their mouths shut and stayed at

HOME

YES, Islam may be a great religion. BUT

-in its fundamentalist version, some of its values are antipathetic to ours, and if they triumph in

EUROPE 

-they will

THREATEN OUR VALUES

such as

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

and

SPEECH

and the spirit of intellectual inquiry that made

EUROPEAN CIVILISATION

Great and Prosperous

 

The danger of ending up like these poor, despotic and medieval

Islamic States

-in which millions live miserably is the prospect that

CHRISTIANS

HINDUS

MODERATE MUSLIMS and NON-BELIEVERS -should be uniting

TO PREVENT

 

BUT THE TRUTH IS WE ARE DOING LITTLE TO STOP IT.

Consider first a few chilling statistics.

EUROPEANS ARE FAILING TO REPRODUCE

[Yet in our own island millions of potential citizens have been 

SLAUGHTERED AT BIRTH

thanks to David Steels -Abortion Bill of 1965?

It is still taking place in 2007 though there is NOW an  growing awareness of the tragedy to the potential mother and to society in general that many more doctors today are refusing to condone the

MURDER.

Recently the sight of full grown foetuses being deprived of their lives has now brought the horror and injustice of the action to destroy life.

In an age of contraception of many devices and anti-life pills it is unbelievable that any potential mother was unable to take the necessary steps to prevent conception.

David Steels Bill was to prevent back-street abortions and he himself a few ears ago voiced his concern as to what has happened over the years since.]

*

Consider  first a few chilling statistics.

Europeans are failing to reproduce. Just to keep the population steady, you need 2.1 births per women

[This is a case for Government action by offering cash and other vital services to enable the reluctant mother to do her best for her community and country.]

However in 2005, the European average was 1.38.

In Ireland it was 1.9

France it was 1.89

Germany 1.35

Italy 1.23

Britain scored in the middle of this range with 1.6

BUT

That was because - like France - we have a large

MUSLIM POPULATION

with a high birth rate. Indeed,

MUSLIMS

are out breeding

 non-Muslims

through out

 EUROPE

 

 

[Many of whom have absolutely no intention of integrating -

Thank you very much Mr Blair -we don't think so.]

'Just look at the development within Europe.'

said a triumphant Norwegian Imam a few months ago

'where the number of

MUSLIMS

is expanding like mosquitoes.

Every Western women in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim women in the same countries is producing an average of 3.5 children.

'OUR WAY OF THINKING WILL PROVE MORE POWERFUL THAN YOURS' he said.

The big question this poses is:

WHY ARE WE NOT REPRODUCING?

There are many reasons, but probably the most important are the decline of religion and the liberation of women.

[The populations which have the stronger religious stance will be the eventual rulers of Europe. It can be a Christian Europe or a Muslim Europe. The Governments of Europe and the shrinking United Kingdom have to decide.]

In Ireland, when the Roman Catholic Church effectively ran society, sex for procreation, contraceptives were banned, the normal size for a family was around five or six children, bur 12 or 13 were not uncommon.

As the country embraced secularism in the 1980s, birth rates plummeted, exacerbated by the new -found confidence of women that made them choose careers rather than domesticity.

WHEREAS in the 1970s, I was regarded in both the UK and Ireland as odd for being married but voluntarily childless, these days, childlessness |

IS A COMMON CHOICE

It is a world where one-child families abound and to have more than two children is to be regarded as eccentric and probably environmentally irresponsible.

Moreover, the erosion of family life and the long - hours culture place a heavy burden on those prepared to rear the next generation.

Despite these social forces, even in the UK, devote Muslims and Orthodox Jews obey instructions to have large families.

Confronted with this demographic revolution and official statistics which showed there were too few young people to support an ageing population, European governments decided to embrace

IMMIGRATION

-as an inherent good without any thought for the consequences.

As a result, politicians and businessmen assured us that we had to have economic growth in n order to prop up ever greater public spending and that it could be provided only by importing large numbers of workers from abroad

BUT WHY WASN'T THERE A NATIONAL DEBATE

ABOUT

Whether it was wise to mortgage our cultural future for the sake of a mess of financial pottage?

[A recent report on the cost  and benefit of large scale

IMMIGRATION

estimated that the country benefited by

ONLY - 50p

 for each migrant]

Where were the politicians arguing against the doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow

ILLEGITIMATE

Who among the liberal elite's commentariat were challenging the moral relativism that flew in the face of

SENSE and SENSIBILITY

-by insisting that the culture of

Shakespeare

The King James Bible

Keats's poetry

Turner's paintings

and

Elgar's music

-was no more important than - the cultures of other

IMPORTED MINORITIES?

 

We know the answer all too well.

Cries of racism drowned out rational argument - not just here but throughout

OLD EUROPE

As one gloomster put it:

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which is thought what

SENTIMENTALITY is to COMPASSION

-means that the intelligentsia of the

WEST

-has disarmed itself in advance of any possible struggle.

The result of all this, as recent events have made tragically clear, was that

BRITISH CULTURE

-was

UNDERMINED and SOCIAL COHESION

DAMAGED.

Separated from mainstream society by geographical and cultural apartheid, which has been fostered by

MULTICULTURALISM

-many immigrants were denied the chance to

INTEGRATE.

 

AND, INSTEAD OF BEING TOLD BY THE HOST COMMUNITY

THAT IF THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ADHERE

-to the values of a liberal, pluralist democracy, they should

RETURN HOME

They were asked how they would like

BRITAIN

-to conform to

THEIR VALUES.

THE STORY WAS VERY MUCH THE SAME THROUGHOUT EUROPE

The robust American political commentator Mark Steyn, a disillusioned Anglophile has already written us off. The thesis of his Blackly comic book,

*

America Alone:

The End Of The World As We Know It

*

-is that the U.S. will survive because the

RELIGIOUS RIGHT ARE CONFIDENT

 AND

 REPRODUCE

BUT

 THAT EUROPE IS FINISHED

Its not just demographic decline, he says, it's also the unsustainability of the

MODERN WELFARE STATE

-in which we depend so much on our own individual resources.

We are also, he believes, suffering from 'civilisational exhaustion':

CULTURAL DISINTEGRATION

-brought about by

BIG GOVERNMENT

[Or if you prefer BIG BROTHER]

-which has fatally

DESTROYED OUR SENSE OF SELF-RELIANCE.

 

MEANWHILE, we are importing large numbers of unemployed youths from abroad in order to maintain

OUR

STANDARD OF LIVING

Yet many of these newcomers have nothing

BUT

CONTEMPT

 FOR OUR

WAY OF LIFE

-and some even wish

TO DESTROY IT

Steyn sees this as a

CIVIL WAR

which

EUROPE

-is too timid even to acknowledge - let alone

LET ALONE WIN

[This is something the Tory Mr Oliver Letwin or as we have said on a number of occasions Mr Let-them-win -and they will, who appears to be out of touch with the real issues that matter to our country in the early years of the 21st century.]

Mr Steyn says:

'Islam has youth and WILL

Europe has age and WELFARE.'

It's hard not to agree with Mark Steyn, especially as every day seems to bring more evidence

THAT AS A SOCIETY

WE ARE TERMINALLY

MAD

For example, this week's fertiliser bomb trial had heard that the key plotters had been radicalised by the hate preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed whom the judge condemned as

'a master of cowardice -who works in the shadows.'

This was the same firebrand who as an asylum -seeker here, had pocketed

£275,000

-in Welfare benefits.

[It is the same mentality shown by

Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer and many others

-who instead of spending the £32 million allocated for building prisons a few years ago are now doing almost anything in order to keep thousands of criminals many repeat offenders and dangerous, out of prison and giving many early release so they can go back to torment their victims and as has happened in a number of occasions returned to have another go at their robbery or other offence knowing that the worst that might happen is either a holiday or community service or whatever  and as many prisons these days are very much like 5star hotels there will be no hardship encountered if they are so lucky to win the prison admission lottery -then it will be a nice break to see old friends and anyway they will be out before they have completed their degree in political science or whatever.

The victims of crime, many of them elderly - poor and lonely won't as a rule be free of fear of their tormentor returning for a second or even third try to rob them of the little they have  and as has happened even assault and kill the defenceless pensioner - but some victims even lose heart and end their own lives by depriving themselves of food because they have lost hope that they can be safe again and we have their so-called protectors such as The Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer the new 'Justice' Minister ? who says 'Jail's the wrong place for burglars' and others who are doing whatever they can to keep the criminals out of jail. If the Army can put up a temporary  barracks in double quick time then there would be spaces for all the thousands of criminals who should be

OUT OF THE COMMUNITY.

Of course there would be complaints that the conditions are not up to the standards of the 5star prisons that they have 'visited' over the years and anyway there is

Tony Blair's

1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

to keep them out of such uncomfortable surroundings which would not provide the 'key' service which has been introduced with their friendly solicitor providing a drugs service as an extra comfort.

THERE IS NO LONGER JUSTICE AS THE SENTENCE DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME

ANYMORE]

*

To continue:

Despite all this, I still believe there are grounds for hope - largely because Muslim hotheads have overplayed their hand by blowing people up, rioting in their neighbourhoods or broadcasting hate -filled speeches which alienate them from the host community.

*

 

[Well we are of the opinion that until the Government shows to the Muslim population that they will not give way on insisting that ALL newcomers and those already with us conform to

OUR RULE OF LAW

 

-and punish without hesitation any breaches of the Law and make it plain that anyone who is a threat to our country WILL BE extradited. BUT of course we have Tony Blair's 1998 Human Rights Act and articles within the 1951 British led Convention of Human Rights which will need amending.

It should be made quite clear that those who have no intention to

INTEGRATE

-should be reminded of their commitment which they gave when they where granted immigration or asylum status (which should be a legal requirement in the future)

Unless drastic action is taken by the next Prime Minister as a priority , future generations of the indigenous population will find themselves foreigners in their own country with their religion and culture under growing  threat. The evidence is before our eyes it is a warning of what the future will bring if action is not taken

QUICKLY AND DECISIVELY

Those moderate Muslims will at last feel secure in the knowledge that they are safe from the extremist influence which up to now they have had it all their own way. By our commitment

IT WILL BE SECURITY THROUGH STRENGTH OF PURPOSE AND THE MUSLIMS WILL BE WITH US

Continue as NOW and they will have nothing but contempt for our indecision and inadequate moral integrity.]

*

To continue:

The sharp-suited, soft spoken undercover agents of the

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

-the banned Egyptian group whose former members include Osma Bin Laden -understand that power is best secured by

STEALTH

by infiltrating institutions and seducing the

MEDIA

Libya's Colonel Gaddafi once exemplified this policy

He said:

'There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe -without swords, without guns-without conquests. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.'

 

[AND THEY SURE MEAN IT]

 

 

[Our survival as a Christian nation can only be achieved by the Government reversing it's abhorrent legislation as to Religious freedom of speech and action because not to do so further emphasises to the extremist elements in our country that we are WEAK and AMORAL nation and therefore ready for conversion by stealth as their numbers obtain the victory while we ignore our Christian past at our peril.

Our close relations to America must be strengthened particularly in the moral arena so that our nations will gain the grudging respect of those who have a desire to replace our Christian heritage with their own.

There will be many who will say that we live in a secular environment and that the Government of the day should not concern itself but we have no choice we either support our Institutions and that includes our Christian inheritance which is ingrained into the very fabric of our nation or  lose that priceless heirloom the foundation of our IDENTITY and accept another more fanatical regime who do not believe in toleration but only in the observance of their one and only deliverer who will have no other faiths before it.

WE HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE

-because a vacuum must be filled and it is better that we know what contain.

The Choice Is Yours!

-but better it will be to retain our own heritage than be converted to another.]

*

But the violent extremists have provoked some signs of a backlash, not just among indigenous populations of Europe but among those tolerant immigrants who value the countries

THAT TOOK THEM IN

The Swedes, of all people, whom liberals claimed had produced a perfect society, are trying to row back on the

WELFARE STATE

-to encourage the

WORK ETHIC

and are demanding

THAT IMMIGRANTS INTEGRATE

 

Nyamko Sabuni a female, Muslim, African immigrant who is now the country's

INTEGRATION and EQUALITY

MINISTER

-insists that

ALL IMMIGRANTS

-should learn Swedish and find a job.

 

She is also intent on criminalising

FORCED MARRIAGES

CHECKING GIRLS FOR EVIDENCE OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION

and

BANNING THE VEIL

as well as

STATE FUNDING

for RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.

[This is an area that needs the new Premier Gordon Brown to put his attention as to make it plain that their is one

RULE OF LAW

in

ENGLAND

[NO EXCEPTIONS FOR MUSLIMS OR ANYONE ELSE IN OUR COUNTRY]

 

 

*          *          *

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

H.F.1294

 
 
 

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

 

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

 

 

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with Londonistan (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

Diversity in the UK

A ranking of social evils 

Multiculturalism and truth

Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

The aims of Localism

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

LONDONISTAN

 

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over THE HEART AND SOUL OF OUR NATION.

 

*

 

 

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY- THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND.

 

 

*

 

 H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

 

 

 
 

 

 

Britain's State  Pension

'POOREST IN THE WEST'

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-12-06 - Britain's state pension ...

 

 

 

 
     

    Parts of Britain are now poorer than

     

     

    POLAND

     

     

     

     | Daily

     

    Mail Online

     

     

     

    Wales-Cornwall-Europes-worst-off.html

     

     

     May 2014 ... EXCLUSIVE By Tom Mctague, Mail online Deputy Political Editor ... The region of
    “West Wales and the Valleys” is now in the top five poorest areas in Western
    Europe - with families HALF as wealthy as their German ..... Huh the British
    pensioner on state pension has to do with £7,000 a year to live on. 17.

     

    Britons have worst state pension in EU | Daily Mail Online

    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article.../Britons-worst-state-pension-EU.html
    12 Nov 2007 ... The average age of retirement in Britain - 62.6 - is also above the EU average of
    61. Some 57 per cent of Britons aged between 55 and 64 are in paid employment
    . Aon found the value of Britain's state pension for a single person is 30.8 per cent
    of the average wage. This figure is 32.5 per cent in Ireland, ...

     

    Fifth of UK's poorest men 'die before they qualify for state ... - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Fifth-UKs-poorest-men-die-qualify-state-pension.html
    0 Apr 2011 ... Around 19 per cent of men from the lowest social classes die before they reach
    65, Labour's former pensions minister Malcolm Wicks said (pictured).

     

    Pensions crisis: 96% of final salary schemes are ... - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Pensions-crisis-96-final-salary-schemes-doomed--OAPs-worst-Britain--state-funds-withering-vine.html
    24 Jun 2009 ... The extent of the pensions crisis has been laid bare by a 'triple whammy' of
    worrying reports.

     

    Retire at 60... if you take cut in state pension - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/.../UK-workers-retire-early-cut-state-pension.html
    13 Oct 2016 ... The review also raises the prospect of blue collar workers in poor areas retiring
    earlier than office workers in wealthier parts of the country. ... To limit the costs of
    the payouts, which have soared due to Britain's ageing population, the
    Government also proposes to review the state pension age every five ...

     

    British state pension 'one of the least generous in ... - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../British-state-pension-one-generous-Europe-giving-UK-workers-bigger-financial-shock-retire.html
    6 Oct 2014 ... British state pension 'one of the least generous in Europe' giving UK workers a
    bigger financial shock when they retire ... By Sean Poulter for the Daily Mail .....
    they will expect us to work till we drop, thus saving any pension payment, old
    people dont work for fun, its because they are so poor they have too. 1.

     

    OECD report puts Britain bottom of pension league table | This is ...

    www.thisismoney.co.uk/.../pensions/.../OECD-report-puts-Britain-bottom-pension-league-table.html
    1 day ago ... Britons thinking about retirement should not rely on their state pension or face up
    to a huge fall in earnings, a report from the influential OECD shows.

     

    UK middle class one of the smallest and poorest in Europe | This is ...

    www.thisismoney.co.uk/.../UK-middle-class-one-smallest-poorest-Europe.html
    25 Apr 2017 ... The UK's middle class remains one of the smallest and poorest in Europe despite
    having expanded the most over two decades. Middle class British family of four
    had a minimum disposable income of between £19,000 - £57,350 in 2010; Italy,
    Spain, UK and Ireland have smallest middle classes in Western ...

     

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

PENSIONER POVERTY

IN

BRITAIN

*

Energy firms shamed over worst tariffs

by Sean Poulter

Daily Mail -Consumer Affairs Editor

DECEMBER 21-2017

BRITAIN'S two biggest energy firms have been shamed by a watchdog for having the most customers on rip-off tariffs.

Some 67 per cent of British Gas non-prepayment meter customers are on its EXPENSIVE STANDARD VARIABLE TARIFF (SVT) which is some £284 a year more than the cheapest deal from a rival.

SSE  has 71 per cent on its SVT , paying £315 a year more than the cheapest deal.

Details revealed by energy watchdog Ofgem which said some firms are not doing enough to encourage customers on the SVT to move to a BETTER TARIFF. The findings provide powerful evidence to support the Governments proposal to increase a CAP on the SVT.

The 'big six firms-British Gas, SSE, E. ON, EDF.  Npower and Scottish Power-say there is need for one because competition is increasing and more families are shopping around.

The figures from Ofgem paint a very different  picture. Of the rest of the big six,

 E.ON has 61 per cent of non-prepayment meter customers on the SVT,

EDF has 52 per cent,

Npower has 48 per cent and

Scottish Power has 41 per cent

 

[The unacceptable face of capitalism-Basic usage of water and power should be

FREE

TO ALL

BUT AT THE VERY LEAST PARTICULARLY

FOR ELDERLY PENSIONERS

ON A LOW FIXED INCOME

 

Excess usage chargeable.]

There's plenty of spare cash in the Foreign Aid Budget which at present is wasted on foreign dancing groups and even handouts to terrorists -as Richard Littlejohn so often remarks 'mind how you go'...'

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

*

DAILY MAIL

DECEMBER 21,2017

About 1,610,000 results
  1. What are Smart Meters? - Smart Energy GB - smartenergygb.org

    Adwww.smartenergygb.org/Smart-Meters/Energy-Bills

    Smart meters show how much gas and electricity you’re using, in pounds & pence

    Save energy & cut costs · See what you’re spending · Clear & fair bills

    Are smart meters safe? Yes. ... This means that, as with traditional meters, smart meters have undergone rigorous tests during the manufacturing process to ensure gas and electricity consumption is being measured accurately. Just like with mobile phones and baby monitors, smart meters emit low radio frequency emissions.

    Are smart meters safe? Smart Meter Help and advice from British Gas

    www.britishgas.co.uk/.../Meters-meter.../Smart-Meters/...smart-meters/Are-smart-meters-safe.html


     

    Watchdog exposes smart meter safety concerns - Utility Week

    https://utilityweek.co.uk/watchdog-exposes-smart-meter-safety-concerns/

    9 Jun 2017 ... BBC Watchdog featured smart meter safety concerns in the first programme of its
    new series last night. The show, which champions consumer interests, identified
    three case studies in which consumers' homes had been left unsafe due to “
    negligent” installation or faulty meters being fitted. In one instance, a ...

     

    Six reasons to say no to a smart meter - The Telegraph

    www.telegraph.co.uk/money/.../six-reasons-say-no-smart-meter/

     Aug 2017 ... The authorities consistently reassured the public that the devices were secure and safe. An investigation by BBC Watchdog, which aired in late July, also raised questions about the links between smart meters and fires. It was not clear whether the meters themselves, or their installation, was at fault.
     

    Are smart meters safe? Smart Meter Help and advice from British Gas

    www.britishgas.co.uk/.../Meters-meter.../Smart-Meters/...smart-meters/Are-smart-meters-safe.html

    re smart meters safe? Yes. ... This means that, as with traditional meters, smart meters have undergone rigorous tests during the manufacturing process to ensure gas and electricity consumption is being measured accurately. Just like with mobile phones and baby monitors, smart meters emit low radio frequency emissions.
     

    What are 'Smart' Meters? « Stop Smart Meters! (UK)

    stopsmartmeters.org.uk/resources/what-are-smart-meters/

    any appliances and consumer goods coming to market today feature tiny RFID
    chips which are capable of communicating with a 'Smart' Meter so that the system
    .... (If you have been led to believe that WiFi is safe, there are many studies
    suggesting otherwise – and even telecoms industry patents (click here) claiming
    it ...

    THE CHOOSE IS YOURS!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.1406

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

[ A TRIUMPH OF HUMAN ENDEAVOUR]

 

How loving parents helped boy into £38,000-a-year ... - Daily Mail

 

From council house to Eton: How loving parents and an inspirational teacher helped this boy from one of Britain's poorest areas into the £38,000-a-year college

  • Stephen Geddes, 16, has won place to study at elite £38,700-a-year Eton College
  • David Crosby, a teacher at Liverpool’s King’s Leadership Academy, tutored him
  • He turned down the chance of a lucrative career in the City to go into teaching 
 

Mr Crosby (right with Stephen), 32, is a bright, likeable man who could have chosen any career he wanted after gaining four A-levels at one of the top-achieving state schools in the country, St Olave’s Grammar School in Orpington, Kent

When maths teacher David Crosby was told his 16-year-old protege Stephen Geddes, raised in one of the poorest areas in Britain, had won a scholarship to study at £38,700-a-year Eton College, he took his glasses off and wept.

‘It was probably the proudest moment of my teaching career,’ says Crosby. ‘To see the look on the faces of his mother and father, to see the look of shock and disbelief on Stephen’s face — to have the knowledge that this was really going to change his life and change this community’s life...’

Mr Crosby, a teacher at Liverpool’s King’s Leadership Academy — a school which was in special measures until just over two years ago — struggles to find the words to describe that overwhelming moment.

‘Teaching can sometimes be a thankless task. When you get moments like that you think, Yes, I am doing the right thing. The early starts and late finishes are worth it. It validates my life decisions.’

Mr Crosby, 32, is a bright, likeable man who could have chosen any career he wanted after gaining four A-levels at one of the top-achieving state schools in the country, St Olave’s Grammar School in Orpington, Kent.

Like most of his classmates, he was destined for a lucrative career in the City after studying history at York University. Until he decided to teach.

‘Most of my friends are investment bankers or consultants in the City. My dad worked in banking too.

‘But I wanted to be able to give students from areas like this the opportunities I was able to have. For me it’s more rewarding than earning a fortune — knowing you’ve made a difference to a young person’s life.

‘Stephen, though, must take 99 per cent of the credit himself for what he’s achieved. This has not been gifted to him. He’s worked hard.

 

Stephen (pictured with his parents) lives in a council-owned property in Dingle, which is in the top 10 per cent of the most deprived areas in England, according to the Department for Communities and Local Government

‘If I’ve done anything to help Stephen, it’s been to raise his aspirations — to shift his perceptions of where in life he might get to. Before now, he’d never considered the prospect of Oxbridge or an American university. All I’ve done is open his eyes.’

Stephen is the youngest of four children of loving parents Brenda, 54, a carer and Stephen, 50, who works in the frozen food department at Tesco.

He lives in a council-owned property in Dingle, which is in the top 10 per cent of the most deprived areas in England, according to the Department for Communities and Local Government.

The area’s terraced streets served as the backdrop to Alan Bleasdale’s gritty drama, Boys From The Blackstuff.

Stephen says: ‘My road is sort of OK. As you go to the main road it can be a bit more dodgy.’

Whatever the road in this neighbourhood, it’s a different world to the green playing fields and privilege of Eton.

‘Before I went to Eton for my interviews (Stephen sat through no fewer than eight academic interviews to secure his scholarship) there were fears about fitting in and being from a different background. I was a bit scared, but I met some of the boys and they were so welcoming.

‘You have the impression they’re going to be posh and stuck-up, but when I went down there and talked to them they were a normal bunch of lads.

‘The school was overwhelming — unreal. People talk about the facilities, but when you see it with your own eyes, it’s just ridiculous.

‘It’s more like a town than a school. There are fields and fields of sport, theatres and 25 boarding houses. It’s absolutely massive.’ Stephen’s eyes are round as saucers when he describes the public school.

 

The academy’s enrolment in the scholarship programme that will see Stephen pack his long black tailcoat for Eton (pictured) next year — run by the SpringBoard Bursary Foundation and Hope Opportunity Trust — is part of head teacher Mark O’Hagan’s plan to give his 455 pupils the best start in life he can

To date, his secondary education has been at the red-brick academy building behind an iron security fence in Dingle.

Just two months ago the school was put in lockdown when a man made racially aggravated threats to the pupils, who are made up of 30 different nationalities.

Stephen wears his maroon uniform with pride, as well he might. Step into the school and while the polished corridors do not exude the privilege of Eton, there is an atmosphere of aspiration and hope.

The academy’s enrolment in the scholarship programme that will see Stephen pack his long black tailcoat for Eton next year — run by the SpringBoard Bursary Foundation and Hope Opportunity Trust — is part of head teacher Mark O’Hagan’s plan to give his 455 pupils the best start in life he can.

Little more than two years ago, this school, formerly known as Shorefields School, was in special measures with many teachers leaving amid worryingly poor academic results.

 

Stephen Geddes gets a hug and kiss from his mother after winning a scholarship to Eton

The academy’s success since it was taken over by the Great Schools Trust, which seeks to emulate the teaching methods of leading independent schools, is dizzying.

Stephen will not be the only pupil heading off to board in a public school next year. He will be joined by four of his classmates, who have also been told they will receive scholarships but have yet to learn which school they will attend.

‘The year tens were playing football when we heard about our successes,’ says Mr O’Hagan. ‘Mr Crosby, who’s been fantastic at raising attainment levels, got the text. Stephen was standing with his best friend Rhys who was also in the scholarship scheme.

‘We’d put in five applications — last year we got one boy a scholarship to Merchiston in Edinburgh. So the best I was hoping for was three. To find out all five were successful, well...’ His face lights up. ‘Can you imagine being able to give five young people that chance? I went up to Stephen and Rhys and shook their hands.’

Things like a firm handshake are, you see, central to the changes made at the academy, which have seen it rise through the league table of schools in Liverpool from 31st — at the bottom — to 12th; the most improved school in the city.

Having adopted a ‘private school’ philosophy, Mr O’Hagan insists his pupils arrive on time with their ties properly done up. The use of mobile phones is not tolerated on school premises. Nor is rudeness to members of staff.

 

Stephen Geddes, 16, from Dingle, in Liverpool, has won a scholarship to Eton

Before each lesson, the children line up to shake a teacher’s hand before entering the classroom.

The school has introduced a house system to encourage competition and colour-coded ties as rewards, both borrowed from the independent sector.

Teachers are never called by their first names either — something which has become increasingly common in state schools up and down the country.

We meet in Mr O’Hagan’s office, which is labelled ‘Oxford’; each of the doors at this school bears the name of a prestigious UK or international university to inspire the children to dream big.

‘As the head of the trust, Sir Iain Hall, puts it, “Your IQ isn’t set by your postcode”. It’s about bringing out the potential in the kids,’ he says. ‘I’ve been to schools like Harrow, and one of the most impressive things is the confidence the kids have.

‘It’s not arrogance. They’re really, really self-aware. We’re trying to give our children that swagger.’

The word ‘our’ is spoken with huge fondness. For, make no mistake, the success of King’s Leadership Academy is about the selfless commitment of each of its 36 members of staff. Take Mr Crosby. His working day begins at 7.45 am. He’ll often still be in his office at 5pm helping one pupil or another with their work and he also gives extra tuition on a Saturday.

‘I wasn’t the first in this morning,’ he says. ‘The head of science was running revision classes at 7am. Teachers stay late. We do Saturday school.

‘This is what is expected when you come to work at King’s. We want to create a school this community can be proud of.’

In its previous incarnation, the school was anything but a source of pride. It was a downright shambles. While students like Stephen, who has been supported throughout his life by caring parents, did their best to work hard, that was nigh-on impossible.

 
 

Left, Prince William during his time at Eton in 2000 and right, Prince William at the prestigious college in 2003

‘The school collapsed when the old head left at the end of my year seven,’ says Stephen, who would then have been just 12.

‘It got to the point where you’d come into school to sit and do nothing because the teachers were never in so we had supply teachers. There was hardly any discipline. The school didn’t care. That’s how I felt — none of the teachers cared. Low-level disruption in class — talking, throwing things at friends — was expected.

‘Most of the teachers just turned a blind eye. There were loads of fights every day — that was normal — and the fire alarm used to go off a lot.

‘I remember months at a time when it went off every day. You’d have to leave your lesson and stand outside for 20 minutes.

‘The change in management has been fantastic,’ he beams. ‘And Mr Crosby has been amazing. He’s my mentor and is always there for me. Even when I was going to Eton for the interviews he said, “If you go and don’t enjoy it, you say”.’

Stephen is a lovely, well-mannered young man who is a credit to his parents as much as the school. His dad, who left school at 15, taught him maths from an early age and nurtured his love of football. Last year he was diagnosed with cancer from which he is, thankfully, recovering. Stephen was distraught but such is his strength of character he did not give up on his studies.

‘It was obviously tough at the start,’ he says. ‘That word cancer is terrifying, particularly when you’ve never experienced it before. I kept going because I knew at the end of the day it would be OK.

‘Me being on a down in the house wouldn’t have helped. I took it upon myself to lift my mum and dad when they were down.

‘I thought: “In six months’ time we won’t be in this situation” — and that’s exactly what it was like. The school obviously knew but I think they also knew what I was like. As soon as I left my front door I left my home problems there. I went into school to do what I was there for: study.’

Mr Crosby smiles fondly when I repeat Stephen’s words to him.

‘His parents have given him an unbelievable set of values,’ he says. ‘We have a moral code at the school called the ASPIRE code. A is for aspiration and achievement, S is for self-awareness, P is for professionalism, I is for integrity, R is for respect and E is for endeavour. The name of the school is King’s Leadership Academy because we’re trying to train them to be the leaders of the future and we believe those characteristics are the qualities of a good leader.

‘Stephen has those qualities written through him like words through a stick of rock and that’s down to his parents as much as us. They’ve been so supportive and never tried to hold him back.

‘They tell him: “This is your dream. Follow it.” I imagine it’s daunting sending your child across the country to a whole new world at the age of 16.’

Indeed, as Stephen says in his native Liverpool vernacular, his parents ‘weren’t fond on’ his going away to board to start with. ‘Obviously, they didn’t want to see me go. But the more we looked into it and saw the opportunities — the facilities, the things you’d be able to do to build yourself up as a person — they could see it could set me up for life.

‘I know they’re scared about letting me go, but they’re just so happy I’ve got an opportunity like this. My mum has hardly stopped crying since she heard. They’ve always provided me with the best they can, but this is huge.

‘I made it clear when I came back from going there that that’s where I wanted to be and they’ve just supported me.

Before all of this, I never really had an idea of what job I wanted.’ He stops to correct himself. ‘Sorry, I mean career. Mr Crosby, when he was helping me with what to do in an interview, said I wasn’t to call it a job, I had to say career or profession.

‘He also taught me to shake hands properly, answer questions in the right way and to keep eye contact.

‘Anyway, before all of this I just took it step by step. I wanted to go to university but mostly I wanted to follow in my dad’s footsteps. I still do. Maybe I’d like to be in a better career but the values he’s got with family, I’d like to have those.’

Stephen’s sheer decency is overwhelming. Yesterday, he visited his primary school St Cleopas to thank them for ‘setting me up with my manners and work ethic’. When he entered the staff room the teachers stood to applaud.

‘See what I mean when I say this is nothing to do with luck?’ says Mr O’Hagan. ‘He’s achieved this through hard work and a good set of values.’

Indeed, you can’t help but feel if anyone is lucky, it will be those at Eton College who rub shoulders with this thoroughly admirable young man. 

 
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5161013/How-loving-parents-helped-boy-38-000-year-college.html#ixzz50rMSMDsd
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

H.F.1411

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

 

U.S. troops deploy worldwide with 10,000 sealed indictments to take down Khazarian mob

 

U.S. President Donald Trump spent the weekend at Camp David with his top generals to map out the exact strategy for decapitating the Khazarian mafia worldwide, say Pentagon sources.  “The Atlanta airport was shut down while the Department of Defense refused to disclose the locations of 44,000 U.S. troops who may be involved in terminating the cabal worldwide,” a senior Pentagon source said.  There are now close to 10,000 sealed indictments as more and more of the Khazarian criminals give up evidence on their colleagues, the sources say.

There are also many extra-judicial killings going on.  “The liberal sanctuary city mayor of San Francisco, Edwin Lee, dropped dead after an illegal alien was found not guilty in the murder of Kate Steinle even after his confession,” one source notes.  “Lee’s death is a message to the Democrats and sanctuary city mayors like Rahm Emmanuel of Chicago and Bill De Blasio of New York City,” the source warns.

The Khazarian mob is also killing off lots of people.  In Japan, two former executives of Toshiba, Atsutoshi Nishida and Taizo Nishimura, suddenly died in the past two months because they were about to provide evidence about the March 11, 2011 Fukushima tsunami and nuclear terror attack against Japan, according to sources close to the royal family.

This attack was carried out by henchmen of the Rockefeller family, whose members include Hillary and Bill Clinton, the sources say.  The Rockellers, in turn, were taking orders from the fascist P2 Freemason lodge, they say.  The Rockefeller family, by the way, has elected Mel Rockefeller, the son of Nelson Rockefeller, as the new family head, these sources added.

In Canada, Barry Sherman, owner of the Canadian pharmaceutical giant Apotex, was found hanging dead alongside his wife Honey by the family’s indoor pool.  According to CIA sources, Sherman was …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Message to the People Who Censor My Hotmail Account

 

 saw the one about people being used as collateral for financial instruments around the world before you deleted it. To the person who sent it, please phone me at +81-90-3439-5558 so that we can talk without the idiots (who will soon be in jail) censoring us. FYI a friend of mine has also seen bonds in Singapore that were backed by US prison slave labour. We will not be free until we end the system of Babylonian debt slavery run

by the privately owned central banks.

Fires in Santa Rosa, California and Waldo Canyon, Colorado

Dear Benjamin,
Here is a picture of the devastation of Waldo Canyon in Colorado in an incredible wild firestorm in 2012.  The reason I bring it up is because it’s the first time we see multitudes of houses burned and cars melted without touching the trees and grasses around the houses;  very close to the Santa Rosa fires of California recently.  At the time, everyone was remarking about melted cars but untouched trees.  First time ever.  I suggest it was the first time DEW weapons were turned onto the U.S. and her people.

More investigation into the two fires has to be done, I realize, but now that many are coming up with pictures of the laser beams hitting in the Santa Rosa area, maybe there were folks who got the same types of pictures for the Waldo Canyon fires without realizing what they were looking at, as it was the first time.  I just wanted to point out the similarities and my suspicions, even in 2012 when I saw these pictures.  Thanks for your time.

 

H.F.730

 

I'm not surprised the absurd Church of England says boys can wear tiaras to school. All common sense has been lost in the gender debate, writes A. N .Wilson.

 

 

New rules for faith schools suggest that males should be able to wear items usually worn by females (stock photograph) 

The rolling tide of transgender propaganda continues to gather force. Recently, the retail chain Topshop made clear its changing cubicles are now gender neutral, even though thousands of women feel more secure undressing in an all-female space.

How many people — really how many — feel deeply wounded by the fact there are female changing rooms which are separate from male changing rooms? Could they not, politely and kindly, be told to 'get over it'?

Meanwhile, it was reported on Sunday that drag queens are being brought into taxpayer-funded nursery schools in London to teach children about sexual and gender diversity.

Confusion

Nursery bosses believe it will be good for these very young children to meet people who 'defy rigid gender restrictions'. I would humbly suggest they should be learning to add up and spell words correctly, but there you are.

One could argue that those nurseries are only following the lead of the Scottish government, which recently issued guidance that would permit primary school pupils to change gender without their parents' permission.

Those of us who have a love-hate relationship with the Church of England, admiring its fundamental principles of Christian worship, but increasingly despairing at its innate absurdity and collective intellectual cowardice, knew it would not be long before it yielded to the current fad.

Sure enough, it has now ruled that in its 4,700 C of E schools new guidelines must be followed on cross-dressing and 'transgender' questions.

School uniform is seen to create potential difficulties for 'trans pupils' and should, if necessary, be abolished. Boys as young as five should be encouraged, if they wish, to come to school wearing tiaras, tutus and high heels.

There is so much emotional and mental confusion going on here, one really does not know where to begin unravelling it — but let it be said loud and clear that this ludicrous attempt to be kind has already led to unnecessary suffering.

Joshua Sutcliffe, a teacher aged 27, saluted a pair of pupils as 'girls'. One of them was 'identifying' as a boy, and the 'hurt' caused has led not merely to the teacher being reprimanded; he is in real danger of losing his job.

When I think of the severe way even the kindest teachers used to address us in the Fifties and Sixties, I do wonder what kind of schoolchildren we are breeding. Naturally, I rejoice in the new spirit of kindliness and tolerance which is abroad in the land, but this question of transgender has moved us all into a surreal inversion of common sense.

'Pupils need to be able to play with the many cloaks of identity and to explore the possibility of who they might be,' says the achingly solemn instruction from the Church.

'For example, a child might choose the tutu, the princess's tiara and heels and/or the fireman's helmet, tool belt and superhero cloak without expectation or comment.'

If you were planning a children's party in your own home, it might seem reasonable to suggest the guests could come in any costumes they chose. If girls wanted to turn up dressed as Harry Potter, or boys as nuns, only a puritan would wish to stop them.

Quite why they should be allowed to do so at school is, surely, a different matter — and why any little child, of whatever gender, should be encouraged to wear high-heeled shoes is a mystery probably only the Archbishop of Canterbury and his politically correct consultants could answer.

 

The C of E has now ruled that in its 4,700 C of E schools new guidelines must be followed on cross-dressing and 'transgender' questions (pictured, Justin Welby)

Apart from anything else, they are extremely bad for your feet, as any bishop would know if he or she had worn them.

Although the new C of E guidelines come in the guise of a campaign against bullying, they specifically single out 'homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying'. And it is really yet another bit of propaganda from the more strident members of the transgender lobby, who can behave with such intransigence and intolerance towards anyone who dares question their ideas.

To be kind to anyone, of whatever age, who is confused about their identity is surely a moral duty for all of us — parents, children and schools.

I have no doubt there are people who feel, when they have become adults, that they were born into the wrong body: they deserve our understanding and should be helped with appropriate treatment. But for a pressure group to lobby for children to question the gender into which they were born seems not merely unhelpful but positively wicked.

The Tavistock Clinic in London, which has a unit that specialises in children and gender transitioning, reports a roughly 20-fold increase in the numbers it sees since 2009.

At the unit, children are sometimes not only given therapy but helped to take steps towards physical sex-change through the use of hormone blockers.

Indulge

It is one thing for a mature person to reach the conclusion that they were really, all along, meant to be a different gender. It is quite another to indulge such confusing ideas in the mind of a child who has not yet finished the bewildering, transformative business of growing up.

No decent school tolerates bullying of any kind, whether it is name-calling, cyber-bullying or physical abuse.

Clearly, to persecute a child because he or she is confused about their gender is as cruel as teasing them for being a 'ginger', or on grounds of race, or whatever it may be.

I do not believe any school in the country does not keep a sharp lookout for this abuse, nor do I think there is any trained teacher who does not know it is their duty to protect children from bullying.

 

It was reported on Sunday that drag queens are being brought into taxpayer-funded nursery schools in London to teach children about sexual and gender diversity

Equally, many children go through phases when they do not particularly like identifying as their own sex. Think of Georgina, the 'tomboy', as they called them in those days, in Enid Blyton's The Famous Five, who cut her hair short, dressed like a boy and insisted on being called George.

Many a tomboy has groaned at having to wear a tunic or a skirt for their school uniform, and no doubt there are some boys who would like to wear girls' clothes, though we are surely at liberty to wonder how many. But there is the world of difference between a tomboy and a girl who is actively encouraged to think of herself as a male.

Derision

That's why I believe it is contemptible for the Church to kowtow to pressure from the transgender movement.

It is also completely illogical. Already, one of the Archbishop of Canterbury's advisers, Lorna Ashworth, a conservative evangelical, has resigned over the Church's desire to be so inclusive that it forgets its own teaching.

The C of E still officially teaches, as do all mainstream churches in the world, that God created the sexes to be distinct. It still condemns sexual activity outside heterosexual marriage as sinful, and forbids the homosexual marriage of its clergy.

Yet, while clinging to this severe and perhaps outmoded way of looking at sexual questions in its theological teachings, in its schools — where impressionable young people are most directly affected — it thinks it a good idea to proselytise about transgender rights.

It would be simply laughable were it not so troubling. This is a Church with an appalling record of covering up child abuse and sexual molestation by bishops and clergy.

Its teaching on sex and marriage is so muddled as to be beneath derision. And now it caves in to the transgender lobby in a move which, while trying to help the tiny number of children who want to 'identify' as a different gender, will surely serve only to confuse the great majority.

 



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5079597/The-absurd-Church-England-says-boys-wear-tiaras.html#ixzz51u7Bu5YX
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

H.F.1422

 
Stephen Glover
 

 on migration and the housing crisis

 

Can we agree

 

 

 

 

immigration has

 

been in many ways a

 

great boon for this country,
 

 

 

 

 

while accepting at the same

 

time that too much of it

 

too quickly is bound to lead to
 

 

problems, ...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 It's not racist

 

 

 

 

to say that

 

 

 

migration has

 

 

fuelled the housing crisis.

 

 

 

 

So
 

 

why won't any politician dare

 

 

do it, asks

 

 

STEPHEN GLOVER

 

Wouldn’t it be wonderful if politicians could agree that next year they will accept the major role immigration has played in putting pressure on housing, the NHS and schools. Pigs might fly!

They were at it again yesterday during Prime Minister’s Questions. Labour’s Rosena Allin-Khan claimed in sepulchral tones that 2,500 children in her Wandsworth constituency will be waking up homeless on Christmas morning.

I wager it has never occurred to Rosena Allin-Khan for a single second in all of her 40 years that mass immigration has contributed significantly to homelessness. Her stock explanation yesterday was austerity, which she insisted must be ended forthwith.

Theresa May reasonably replied that being homeless did not mean sleeping rough. But she didn’t drop the slightest hint that the greatest demographic upheaval in our history has a lot to do with the scarcity of affordable housing. She never does. Nor does any minister.

Then Jeremy Corbyn reprised his familiar routine of claiming the NHS is in crisis simply because the Government has not sunk enough billions into it. The notion that rapidly rising demand on our health services has been partly stoked by unprecedented levels of immigration has not yet penetrated his cloudy mind.

Why is it politicians of both parties, and the BBC and much of the media, will not mention the dreaded ‘I’ word in relation to the scarcity of resources? It surely can’t just be because they are bone-headed or ignorant.

No, I suspect the deeper reason is they are terrified of being thought racist. This is the accusation they most fear. So every ding-dong about the allocation of resources proceeds without anyone mentioning the gigantic, but perennially mute, elephant in the room.

Well, it’s not remotely racist to suggest that if a country has net migration of around 250,000 every year for ten years, that is bound to place an extra strain on public services and the availability of housing.

Can’t we all agree that immigration has been in many ways a great boon for this country, while accepting at the same time that too much of it too quickly is bound to lead to problems? For the life of me, I can’t see why this is ‘racist’.

Very occasionally a body with a calm and analytical approach, and without any taint of racism, casts some light on a debate normally carried on in complete darkness. One such organisation is Migration Watch, whose figures, I know from experience, are copper-bottomed.

According to a new report by Migration Watch, high levels of net migration have driven the soaring demand for rental properties over the past decade. Young people are paying the price through ever higher rentals, which in turn make it more difficult for them to save for a deposit.

What! Think of all the millions of young people who voted for Jeremy Corbyn in June, partly because they believed (wrongly) he would abolish tuition fees, and partly because they were cheesed off by soaring rents and not being able to buy homes until they are middle-aged.

 

Jeremy Corbyn claimed the NHS was in crisis due to a funding shortage. But unprecedented levels of immigration have placed further strain on the service

Get a few representatives of this disgruntled tribe in a room and I’ve no doubt they would be astonished to learn the housing crisis is in large measure driven by uncontrolled immigration — of which they probably, in most instances, whole-heartedly approve.

No, they would protest. It’s the Government’s fault for not building enough houses, or the result of greedy and unscrupulous landlords driving up rents. I’m sure that’s what Jeremy thinks.

But look at the figures — all in the public domain — which Migration Watch has brought together. As supply has failed to keep pace with demand, rents in England have risen 23 per cent over the past decade.

It’s even worse in London, where between January 2008 and January 2017 rents have increased by 36 per cent, considerably more than the 21 per cent rise in average earnings.

Over the same period, homes headed by someone born abroad accounted for more than 80 per cent — I repeat, 80 per cent — of the total growth (265,000 out of a 328,000 net increase) of households in London’s rented sector.

The report points out that across England, out of the net increase of just over 1.2 million in the number of new households between 2005 and 2014, more than 1.1 million had a foreign-born head.

What is to be done? Some people simply call for more housing, even if this means building on Green Belt land. But successive governments seem incapable of putting up enough new homes. The annual average of new houses over the past decade is only 130,000, though it is estimated 300,000 a year are needed.

Despite the Government’s recent pledge to build more homes, it would take a very wild optimist to think that the huge imbalance between supply and demand is going to be corrected any time soon.

It’s only common sense. If the population of a small island increases by the equivalent of a city the size of Portsmouth every year for ten years, there are bound to be new burdens — and not just on housing.

 

NHS maternity wards are also under severe strain. One factor is a high birth-rate partly fuelled by migration (file image)

A report in today’s Mail reveals almost 140,000 errors occurred on NHS maternity wards last year, ranging from harmless blunders to very serious errors which led to brain damage or death.

Maternity wards are evidently under severe strain. The Jeremy Corbyns of this world will, as usual, automatically blame lack of resources, but there is much more to it than that. One cause is a larger number of complex deliveries because of older or overweight mothers. Another factor is a high birth-rate partly fuelled by migration.

According to the Office for National Statistics, more than six in ten babies born in London hospitals last year had mothers who are either immigrants or were visiting from abroad. Is it any surprise these units are under such pressure?

Austerity, austerity, austerity is the unthinking mantra of the Left in response to our often buckling public services. Too much immigration in too short a period of time would probably be a more accurate explanation.

And yet both Government and Opposition and much of the media persist in playing fantasy politics in which no one ever alludes to one major reason for our services being so overstretched.

I can’t be alone in finding such ingrained dishonesty very depressing. It shouldn’t be beyond the wit of intelligent politicians to extol the enormous contribution which immigrants make to our society while accepting there is sometimes too heavy a social cost.

Of course sensible people — including many recent immigrants — know the real score: the lengthening queues at A&E and in GP surgeries, the pressure on school places and the housing crisis, all of which are at least partly attributable to letting immigration run riot.

And that is why getting back control of our borders, so net migration can be reduced to less than 100,000 a year, remains the cornerstone of Brexit negotiations — and we mustn’t let the Government forget it.

Labour’s solution of ever-greater public spending will never work because there simply isn’t enough money. Where is the reputable politician brave enough to tell the truth — which is that lower migration will take some of the strain off housing and give us better public services?

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5200603/Stephen-Glover-migration-housing-crisis.html#ixzz51uUX4sow
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

[AS one would say ,as usual, 'They can't see the wood for the trees!']

[The problem seems that few politicians will PUT AT RISK their jobs for life-where political correctness raises its mischievous - demented head. 'Tied in knots' - appears to be the relevant phrase to cover it!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CHANGED TEXT ETC IS OURS!]

 

H.F.1423

 

 


    POLITICAL CORRECTNESS A FORM OF

     

     

    NAZISM?

 

 

 
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BRITAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

DOMINIC LAWSON: Why pompous Milburn is so wrong about Britain's haves and have nots

Jumped before he was pushed: Alan Milburn presented his departure as 'social mobility tsar' as a resignation on a matter of principle despite the fact his term had come to an end

How strange it is that Alan Milburn should routinely have been described as the Government's 'social mobility tsar', a grandiose title to which he never objected.

After all, the Russian tsar was the apex of a system of absolute social hierarchy. Now our social mobility 'tsar' has abdicated, protesting that the Government is doing nothing to bring about the more equal country that the Social Mobility Commission was designed to support.

In fact Milburn's abdication is no more voluntary than that of Tsar Nicholas II, 100 years ago. As Justine Greening, the Education Secretary, pointed out yesterday, he'd been doing the job for five years 'and his term had come to an end'.

In other words, Milburn jumped before he was pushed, and presented it as a resignation on a matter of principle.

In one respect, Milburn really did enjoy the status of a tsar: his pronouncements as chairman of the Social Mobility Commission were always accorded complete reverence — not least on the BBC — and were never subjected to any sort of critical review.

When this quango was launched in 2012 by the then coalition top team of David Cameron and Nick Clegg (largely, I suspect, because both men were embarrassed by their own exclusively private education and wealthy backgrounds), Milburn declared: 'We live in a country, where, invariably, if you're born poor, you die poor.'

He repeated this on many occasions — and was never challenged on it by his many TV and radio interviewers.

But it is — and was — completely untrue. Even the Sutton Trust, an organisation dedicated to the cause of increasing the life-chances of the less well-off, has produced research completely refuting Milburn's central proposition.

Feared

Its most recent analysis, dividing society into quartiles by income, revealed that 62 per cent of sons born to fathers in the bottom income quartile, themselves escaped into the higher three quartiles.

 

Education Secretary Justine Greening pointed out on the Andrew Marr show that Alan Milburn jumped before he was pushed from the role

Moreover, as you would expect, there was social movement (as defined by income) in the opposite direction.

Only 42 per cent of sons born to fathers from the top income bracket managed to retain that position in the highest income quartile — and 16 per cent of those born in the top income category slid all the way to the bottom.

So why did Milburn get away with it? Well, the Conservatives didn't dare criticise him because they feared — especially under David Cameron — that they would be seen as defending 'elitism'. And for Labour, Milburn's position was pleasantly in accord with their own claim that only a Labour government would represent 'the many, not the few'.

Funnily enough, it is within the Labour party — of which the former Cabinet minister Milburn is still a member — that there has been an actual retreat in working-class success.

In 1964, 37 per cent of Labour MPs were from a family background of manual work; by 2015 that figure had plunged to just 7 per cent.

 

David Cameron's government dare not criticise Milburn because they feared that they would be seen as defending 'elitism'

This process is even accentuated by its current leader, Jeremy Corbyn, as the resoundingly middle-class socialist pressure group Momentum tightens its hold on the selection process.

Ludicrous

On Saturday, the Mail reported 'Labour insiders' as saying that the son of a miner, Kieran Harpham, had been de-selected as a Sheffield councillor because he was 'too authentically working-class' and 'not Left-wing enough': he has been replaced by Janet Ridler, a historian from Sheffield's wealthiest suburb, Dore.

To be fair to Alan Milburn, he is far from a Corbyn fan. He is, to the contrary, a Blairite. And, echoing his former boss, Milburn presented Brexit as a curse on British society, which must somehow be lifted. 'Tough on Brexit, tough on the causes of Brexit,' was Milburn's ludicrous slogan yesterday — which is as much as to say that he thinks the British people's decision to leave the EU was nothing less than a crime.

He went on to argue, confusingly, that if Theresa May didn't do what he said about social mobility, she would be 'betraying the families who voted for Brexit'.

His claim, such as it is, seems to be that those who voted to leave the EU did so as a protest against the nation's lack of social mobility, and its alleged adverse effect on their living standards.

It is an assertion both presumptuous and pompous, based on no evidence. If anything, the pro-Brexit vote in the Labour heartlands was one in favour of greater social cohesion, and against the form of mobility defined by the EU's absolute guarantee of freedom of movement.

Milburn's ludicrous 'tough on Brexit, tough on the causes of Brexit,' slogan suggests that he thinks the British people's decision to leave the EU is nothing less than a crime

The consequent unchecked level of immigration into the UK had many benefits, but the influx of millions of Europeans to work in this country also had a depressing effect on the wages of the unskilled. Such voters would, more likely, argue that the only way Mrs May could 'betray' them over Brexit would be to do what Mr Milburn wants and keep Britain inside the Single Market (which mandates freedom of movement).

But what is it, above anything else, which enables those from less well-off homes to have a chance of prosperity? A first-class quality of free education and the prospect of regular employment at the end of it. By both these measures, Britain has actually been upping its game — and it has nothing to do with Mr Milburn's Social Mobility Commission.

Employment rates have been rising, for year after year, and the proportion of families without anyone in paid work has (thankfully) gone in the opposite direction — down. The latter has much to do with the benefit reforms pioneered by Iain Duncan Smith.

His colleague, Michael Gove, was also instrumental, as Education Secretary, in driving up standards in state schools by demanding a greater level of rigour in both teaching and examinations.

The result of this has been a narrowing of the quality gap — and public exam outcomes — between state schools and private schools.

Again, this was no thanks to the Social Mobility Commission. It had nothing useful to say about improving the standards of teaching, and instead advocated lowering standards of entry at our top universities to those from the poorest homes. What a counsel of despair.

Of course we are an unequal society. As are all societies in all nations, always. But despite the self-serving cliches of the Left, last year in the UK income inequality — defined as the gap between the earnings of the richest and the poorest — fell to its lowest level since 1986.

Benefit reforms pioneered by Iain Duncan Smith, left, and the drive to improve standards in state schools by his colleague Michael Gove had nothing to do with Mr Milburn's Social Mobility Commission

And, as the Chancellor Philip Hammond pointed out in his Budget speech a fortnight ago, since 2010 the incomes of the poorest 10 per cent have grown faster, proportionately, than the richest 10 per cent.

Obsessed

It's true that we are in a long period of earnings stagnation: but this applies across the developed world. And it is simply not the case that Britain is at the bottom of the international league table in terms of social mobility.

We are probably more obsessed with class than any other nation, and accent still plays too much of a role in the way we treat each other.

But as Peter Saunders, emeritus professor of sociology at Sussex University explained in his recent Civitas pamphlet, Social Mobility Delusions: 'Social mobility is the norm in Britain, not the exception, and it covers the range from top to bottom. Politicians say our social mobility rate is one of the lowest in the Western world, but studies of class mobility put Britain around the middle of the international rankings.

'The chances of moving into a different class than the one you were born into are less than in Sweden, the U.S. and Australia, but better than in Germany, France or Italy.'

So do we actually need a quango called the Social Mobility Commission?

We can certainly do without another social mobility 'tsar'. 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5142221/Why-Milburn-wrong-Britains-haves-nots.html#ixzz50fTDt3Ba
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

H.F.1408

 

 
 
 

 

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

 

 

 

 

 

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

 

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

 

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
(Jeff )RENCE.COM  TRUTHCONTROL.COM/  

WHATDOESIT MEAN.COM

 

 

HUMANS ARE FREE

CLIMATE CHANGE A HOAX-TRUMP KNOWS IT-NOW YOU KNOW IT!

The Rothschilds.
 

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; AND WASTEFUL CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 
 

 

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2017

 

THIS IS:

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART -NEW- HOME PAGE-2017

 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

-2019

 
OUR KB'S (-) DROPPED OVER NIGHT (DECEMBER 10-2017) FROM A REGULAR 95-103 KB's TO JUST 25-35 K B'S

WE ASK! HAVE WE OFFENDED SOMEONE?

   ' May I ask  you then to believe, as  I do most devoutly believe, that the mora\l law was not written for men alone in their individual character, but that it  was written as well for nations, and for nations great as this of which we are citizens.  If nations reject and deride that moral law, there is a penalty which will evitably follow.  It may not  in our lifetime; but, rely upon it, the great italian is not a poet only, but a profit, when he says,-

'

'''The sward of heaven is not in haste to smite

Nor yet doth linger.'

 

We have experience, We have beacons, we have landmarks enough. We know what the past has cost us, we know how much and how far we have wandered, but we are not left without a guide.  It is true we have not, as an anciet people had, Urim and Thummin - those oraculous gems on Aaron's breast - dfrom which to take counsel, but we have the unchangeable and eternal principles of the moral law to guide us, and omnly so far as we walk by that guidance can we be permantly a great nation, or our people      a happy people.

 

JOHN BRIGHT MP

OCT.29,1858

Speech on Foreign Policy

BIRMINGHAM

Town Hall.

*   *   *