ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

*

DECFREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017  (1994 -Official Website -DEC-PT4-2017 )-- DEC FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017

 RETURN TO:

DECFREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017  (1994 -Official Website -DEC-PT4-2017 )-- DEC FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

Ours might be a stronger and happier Society if Christians were readier to defend their values.

 

In the Daily Mail on Tuesday the 21st December 2004 an article by their columnist Stephen Glover has shown a Solomon touch in his case for Free Speech and Sensitivity in the Religious aspect of many of our citizen’s lives.

*

'Most people will be shocked that hundreds of Sikhs should have laid siege to a Birmingham theatre on Saturday and brought the performance of a controversial play to an early end.  Windows were smashed, missiles thrown and three police officers were injured.

 Now the management of the Birmingham Rep has abandoned the production of Behzti after failing to reach an agreement with Sikh leaders.  With the prospect of further riots, it could not guarantee the safety of theatregoers.

The play, deeply provocative to many Sikhs, depicted rape and murder in a Sikh temple.  Written by the Sikh female writer Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti, it is the story of a mother and daughter who visit a temple where murder and abuse take place.

 After Saturday’s riots, Sikh leaders had made the apparently preposterous claim that the setting of the play should be changed from a temple to a community centre.

On the face of it, these activities amount to an outrageous suppression of free speech.   The threat of brute force has led to the abandonment of the play that broke no laws, and which law-abiding citizens had paid good money to see.  To force closure challenges the Values of an Open Society which most of us hold dear.

Precious

Without a doubt, the incident will be used by those on the far-Right such as the BNP They will say it shows that immigrants such as Sikhs with their own religious beliefs cannot be expected to respect British customs.  Others more liberal disposition will limit themselves to the observation that free speech is a precious thing that must be defended at all costs.

Right and Left will agree that the behaviour of the Sikh leaders shows how they have not signed up to the post-enlightenment values that prevail in the host society.   Most of us accept the proposition that we fight ideas with other ideas-not with violence and censorship.

Of course, much of this is true.  I deplore censorship.  And yet part of me is unable to share in the general outrage.  This bit of me even feels a degree of sympathy for the Sikhs.  They were protecting something precious about their religion.  No one can condone violence, but it is difficult not to admire their- to us- very unfashionable defence of religious beliefs.

In fact, the very idea that anything goes in the theatre or literature was not born fully –formed in the Enlightenment 250 years ago.

Until quite recently most people, including many who thought themselves as liberals, believed that there should be limits on free expression, particularly in matters of religion and sex.  In the theatre the Lord Chamberlain ensured that there were few, if any profanities.

 

In the history of this country-even its democratic history-the belief that free speech should be completely untrammelled is a very recent one.  Over the past 40 years, there has been a string of films and plays mocking Christ, not withstanding the blasphemy laws, which are largely ignored.

Monty Python’s Life of Brian showed one of the thieves crucified with Christ singing to him on the cross, Always look on the Bright Side Of Life.  In the film the Last Temptation Of Christ, the saviour was depicted making love to Mary Magdalen.

Such films have caused enormous upsets, and some complaints, though we have seen nothing to rival the Sikhs rioting in Birmingham.  A recent production in St Andrews in Scotland of Terry Mac Nally’s play Corpus Christi- that depicts Christ and his disciples as homosexuals-did attracts a small peaceful protest by Christian fundamentalists.

This Christmas Madame Tussaud’s  exhibited sacrilegious waxworks of ‘Posh and Becks’ as Mary, mother of Jesus, Joseph, with no regard for the feelings of Christians.  A current Channel 4 brochure carries a photographic spread of the Gallaghers from the ‘current hit show, Shameless’.

It shows them in the attitude of the apostles at the Last Supper.  The figure playing Christ leans forward drunkenly. Beer can in one hand, a cigarette in the other.

 

Notoriety

 

What is striking about all these examples is how poor they are as works of art.  Their notoriety derives from the ability to shock.  I dare say the same can be said of Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti’s play in Birmingham.  But even third-rate works can cause offence if the ideas they contain are sufficiently provocative.

 

Indeed, it is the mark of an inferior playwright that he should set out simply to provoke rather than to enlighten.  If Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti’s object was to suggest that Sikhs in temples could behave improperly-as we know Roman Catholic priests can in their own world-she could have made her point more subtly without inflaming the very Sikhs whom she would presumably like to influence.

 

Having chosen a holy temple as her setting, she could have hardly been expected to change it in order to please her critics.  But she would have been wiser to have found a less contentious venue in the first place.

 

I am not advocating suppression of free speech.  It would have been better if the play had been allowed to proceed as written.  But I do feel a degree of respect for the way in which Sikhs are prepared to defend their religious values in the face of merciless assaults from their enemies.  They show robustness which most ordinary Christians-excepting a few fundamentalists-are too timid to express.

 

Family

And perhaps this explains why Sikhs, one of the most successful of immigrant groups observe their religion to an extent that is barely intelligible to most white Britons.  For them religion is not something which may happen just at Christmas or Easter, if at all.  It is part of the daily routine of their lives, and informs their belief in the importance of the family and their social group.

 

Many will say that the religious intolerance shown by Sikhs in Birmingham shows how dangerous diverse Britain is becoming as a society.  Here are people who put their religious beliefs before the notion of free speech.  The same point is often made in relation to British Muslims, whose supposedly primitive beliefs are also pronounced to be pre-Enlightened.

 

Certainly the intolerance is worrying, but the main lesson I draw from events in Birmingham is that Sikhs comprise a group in our society, which retains a laudably strong religious conviction, as well as a firm belief in the family.

They are not prepared to see their beliefs mocked and degraded as many Christians have been.

 

If these Values could be expressed peacefully and in a way that did not threaten free speech, would they not be an inspiration, rather than a threat to Christian Britain?

 

Ours might be a stronger and happier society if Christians were readier to defend their values, and if third-rate playwrights thought twice before attacking them.

*          *          *

[Font altered-bolding used-comments in brackets]

 

[For details of a peaceful Christian fellowship, which travels the country to protest at blasphemy and insult to Christ –contact ‘Christian Voice’

  www.christian-voice.org.uk                            

Patron: The Lord Ashbourne.]

DECEMBER 21-2004

 

 

 

 

 CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE**** GAMBLING AND ETHICS****CHRISTIANITY,THE PEOPLE, AND ETHICS****IMMIGRATION POLICY**** CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION_IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE_WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE****CHRISTIAN BELIEFS UNDER ATTACK BY EU'S PARLIAMENT IS INTELLECTUAL NAZISM**** A DEFENCE OF CHRISTIANITY BY A ONCE AGNOSTIC****WHO CARES ABOUT MORALITY****DEMOCRACY WITHOUT MORALITY AND RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUALITY IS DESPOTISM****THE WORLD IS DIVIDED INTO MANY RELIGIOUS CIRCLES OF INFLUENCE****THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY****CHRISTIAN PARLIAMENTARIAN SPEAKS ON TAX BILLS-FOREIGN POLICY-PEACE-AND THE POWER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS****OURS MIGHT BE A STRONGER AND HAPPIER SOCIETY IF CHRISTIANS WERE READIER TO DEFEND THEIR VALUES****SUNDAY SCHOOL CAN SAVE CHILDREN FROM DELINQUENCY-SAYS BISHOP****OUR CHRISTIAN FESTIVAL OF EASTER WHICH MANY KNOW SO LITTLE AND SOME NONE****

AN AGE WHEN ALL FAITHS ARE EQUAL-EXCEPT CHRISTIANITY****

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN-by -MICHAEL NAZIR ALI-BISHOP OF ROCHESTER-DEC-2006****

 

 

WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY

 

 

O COME ALL YE FAITHFUL…

EXCEPT CHRISTIANS.

[WHETHER ONE IS A CHRISTIAN OR NOT ENGLAND HAS A CHRISTIAN HERITAGE AND IF THE SUPPORT FOR THAT PRICELESS INHERITANCE IS LOST THEN IT WILL BE FILLED BY OTHERS OF WHOM SOME HAVE A MORE AGGRESSIVE AND UNFORGIVING NATURE WHICH WOULD TAKE US BACK TO THE DARK AGES.]

 

 
  A MESSAGE FROM 1938 AS TRUE TODAY IN SEPTEMBER 2017

ENGLAND

EPILOGUE

WILLIAM RALPH INGE - DEAN of ST PAULS

1938

Christianity is the generic name of a number of different religions, some of which have only an adventitious connexion with the Gospel of Christ.  Genuine religious revivals occur from time to time, and have a starting, but short-lived, popular success. They are difficult to predict, and they seem more congenial to the so-called Celtic temperament, for example in Wales, than  to the more stolid character of the English. There are no signs at all that any outburst of religious enthusiasm is likely to occur in England in the twentieth century.  Superficially, the organized religious  bodies seem to be slowly losing ground.  The emancipation of women, and the education which they now receive, have assimilated their mental outlook to that of men, and this has been injurious to the interests of institutional religion, much more in the north of Europe than in the Latin countries, where the position of women has changed less.  These tendencies have led many  to expect a gradual disappearance of religion from its age-long position as one of the most potent factors in social life.  In much of our most modern literature it is simply left out of account.  But a serious thinker, whatever his personal convictions, will be slow to believe in such a rapid and subversive change in human nature.   He may even doubt whether the decay of Christianity has not been much more apparent than real.  The essence of Christianity is, as Nietzsche said, a "transvaluation of all values," a conviction about the position of man in relation to the unseen Divine Power who made and governs the universe.  It is essentially a religious idealism, which traces its origins to a historical revelation. It appeals very strongly to those who are susceptible to such a call, but, as its Founder repeatedly warned his disciples, it is never likely to be acceptable to the majority.   The Believers were to be the salt of the earth, or like leaven hid in three measures of meal.

 "The Spirit of Truth" is a Spirit whom "the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not neither knoweth him."

The Church, however, was not long content to appeal to the anima naturaliter Christiana, or to the penitent sinner who often has the makings of a saint.   It issued irreligious appeals, in the form of lurid threats and gorgeous promises, to the irreligious, and by a means of unholy alliances with the secular arm became, at least nominally, the creed of everybody.   But it is the law that a religion which gains power by non-religious methods [ As do Muslim Fundamentalists in Mosques in England in 2017 with their aim of a ISLAMIC STATE] invariably uses it for non-religious ends.  Church history in the so-called ages of faith presents a most unedifying spectacle.  What  has happened in our day (1938)  is  that these non-religious appeals have lost their cogency.   Partly from discoveries in natural science, but still more from the growth of the scientific attitude in weighing evidence, the materialistic pictures of bliss and torment, which once produced a certain effect, are now either rejected or interpreted in a very symbolical sense.   Deprived of these weapons, the Church has proceeded to secularize itself, and to present the Gospel as ca prophecy of " a good time coming" in this world. 

 But this is quite obviously not Christianity, and the laity do not like  the priest in politics.

So the Churches against their will, are thrown back upon their real message and their own business.

There  is no reason to think that the strictly religious appeal of

CHRISTIANITY

is less powerful than it ever was; but , as always, it is an appeal which does not attract the majority.

The proper attitude of the Church is frankly to accept this position, which is that of the Founder himself, and to find its usefulness in steadily holding before the nation a heroic and noble ideal of belief and conduct, in contrast with the secularity, greed, and hypocrisy of society in general.  So purified from extraneous accretions, Christianity may in the future exercise an incalculably beneficent influence upon the life of the nation, and may win the allegiance of many who at present stand aloof from it.

(Pages 299/300.)

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

Brought-forward from:

 

DECEMBER 21-2004

 

H.F.1306

 

 

 

[A DEVIL! OF A VERDICT!]

 

 

 

Christian student kicked out by his university because he ... - Daily Mail

 

Christian student kicked out by his university because he wrote Facebook messages opposing gay marriage  

  • Felix Ngole, 38, expelled from Sheffield University after Facebook message

  • Postgraduate father of four had been studying to become a social worker

  • Set to appeal because of consequences for the ‘freedom of expression’

By Eleanor Harding for the Daily Mail

 Brought forward from: February 29,2016

 

'Censored': Felix Ngole, 38, was expelled from Sheffield University

A Christian student has been ejected from his university course for voicing his opposition to gay marriage on Facebook.

Felix Ngole, 38, was expelled from Sheffield University after faculty staff decided he ‘may have caused offence to some individuals’.

The postgraduate father of four, who was studying to become a social worker, has been told his actions affect his fitness to practise and was ordered to hand back his student ID and library card.

Mr Ngole was reported after using his private Facebook account to express support for Kim Davis, a county clerk from Kentucky, who was jailed for refusing to issue marriage licences after the introduction of same-sex unions there last September.

Mr Ngole argued that homosexual activity is against the teaching of the Bible, quoting a verse from Leviticus describing it as an ‘abomination’.

Yesterday, he said he was appealing the university’s decision because the case had wider consequences for the ‘freedom of religion and freedom of expression’.

Claiming he had been censored, he added: ‘The university claims my views are discriminatory, but I am the one being discriminated against because of my expression of Christian beliefs.

‘I wonder whether the university would have taken any action if a Muslim student who believes in Sharia law, with its teaching about women and homosexuality, had made moderate comments on his Facebook page. I don’t think so.’

Following a disciplinary hearing, the student was told he had brought his profession ‘into disrepute’ and breached ‘personal conduct’ guidelines. A separate ‘fitness to practise’ panel later concluded that he was entitled to his opinion about gay marriage but may have ‘caused offence to some individuals’.

They said his comment would affect his ability to operate in the social work profession even though he was not yet qualified.

Mr Ngole came to the UK from Cameroon as an asylum seeker in 2003 and has since gained two university degrees and worked as a teacher. If his appeal is unsuccessful, he plans to take legal action on human rights grounds against Sheffield University, which is one of 24 in the elite Russell Group of universities. He added: ‘My beliefs about marriage and sexual ethics reflect mainstream, biblical understanding, shared by millions around the world.

‘Simply expressing that understanding, in a personal capacity, on my Facebook page, cannot be allowed to become a bar to serving and helping others in a professional capacity as a social worker.’

Andrea Williams, of the Christian Legal Centre, said: ‘He is not someone in a public position, but rather a student, who is entitled to express his views. There is no evidence that Felix’s views impacted his work, or that he was not a hard-working student who should qualify in due course. Sadly, this is yet another case of Christians being ‘neutered’ in the public arena, and of censorship of views.’ A spokesman for the University of Sheffield said she could not comment on individual cases.

The case has parallels with that of Adrian Smith, a housing trust manager from Greater Manchester, who was demoted in 2011 when he opposed gay marriage on Facebook.

A growing culture of intolerance at universities now means that some student unions have adopted ‘safe space’ policies that allow controversial speakers be banned if they are deemed offensive. Historian David Starkey was removed from a promotional Cambridge University video over claims his views were ‘racist’.
 

The postgraduate father of four was studying to become a social worker at Sheffield University (pictured)

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3468712/Christian-student-kicked-university-wrote-Facebook-messages-opposing-gay-marriage.html#ixzz4xTdMf8d6
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

Brought forward from February 29,2016

 

H.F.1366

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

 

NEW AGE

OF

 INTOLERANCE

 

A.N. WILSON on the new dark age of intolerance: You must believe in gay marriage, you can't question abortion and as for transgender rights...

By A.n. Wilson For The Daily Mail

 September 30- 2017

The great French writer Voltaire famously said: 'I disapprove of what you say and would defend to the death your right to say it'. In this way, he encapsulated what it meant to be an enlightened human being — someone prepared to consider all points of view.

But in recent years the principle of freedom of speech, sacred since Voltaire's 18th century, has been lost, and this is surely one of the most sinister features of our times. It is as if we are entering a new Dark Age of Intolerance.

The irony is that this intolerance has come about as a result of what were initially good intentions. One of the things which makes me happy as I grow older is the thought that during my lifetime we have all tried to become a kinder society.

When I was a boy and a young man, for example, racist jokes were the norm on radio and TV. Now they would be unthinkable. Mockery of homosexuals, and the equation of being gay with being limp-wristed and camp, were absolute norms of comedy when I was growing up. Now no longer.

Such jokes have gone the way of boarding-houses which used to put 'NO BLACKS. NO DOGS. NO IRISH in the window'. Obviously, all civilised people feel pleased by this.

But somehow those initial good intentions — to be kinder to and more tolerant of others — have morphed into a political correctness that has had the very opposite effect.

Two notorious recent examples of this concerned the treatment of a Christian baker in Northern Ireland, and some Christian bed and breakfast owners in Berkshire. The baker had not wanted to make a wedding cake for a gay couple who were getting married. The B&B owners had refused to let a gay couple share the same room in their establishment. In each case they were successfully sued for unlawful discrimination.

Now, a gay activist would no doubt say this was a good thing, arguing that the baker and bed and breakfast owners' behaviour was comparable to the racism of the past. Yet this is surely getting things wholly out of proportion.

The baker was not persecuting homosexuals, as Hitler did. He was not saying they should be put in prison, as all Home Secretaries in Britain did until the Sixties. He was merely saying that, as a Christian, he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman, and that two chaps tying the knot were doing something rather different, which is contrary to traditional Christian teaching.

Whatever you think about this matter, the Northern Irish baker and the B&B couple were merely holding on to Christian beliefs.

I don't happen to share their views myself, and think that if two people are rash enough to promise to live together for the rest of their lives, good luck to them, whether they are gay, straight, trans or anything else. But surely you can understand both sides of this dilemma, can't you?

Well, the answer, more and more in our intolerant society, is 'No'. My concern here is not about the rights and wrongs of gay marriage, transgender rights, our colonial history, or any of the other emotive issues that are subject to endless debate in the modern age.

It is about freedom of thought and speech; freedom to disagree in a liberal society; freedom to have thoughts which are different from the current orthodoxy.

What began as our very decent desire not to be nasty to those of a different ethnicity, or sexual proclivity, from ourselves, has turned into a world as intolerant as monkish Christianity in the days of the Dark Ages, when any freedom of thought is questioned.

Tim Farron, leader of the Lib Dems during the General Election, was asked repeatedly about his views on gay marriage. As a fairly old-fashioned Christian, he did not believe it was possible — marriage should be between a man and a woman.

As the leader of a modern political party, he knew that it would be political death to admit this. He was finally forced to resign.

This was a signal to the world that if you want to succeed in modern politics, it is simply not allowed to hold views which, until a very short time ago, were the consensus among the great majority of people in the Western world.

I use the words 'not allowed' advisedly. What is sinister about living in the new Dark Ages, however, is that it is by no means clear who is doing the allowing and not allowing. In Mao's China, it was obvious: thought crimes were ideas which contradicted the supreme leader.

In Britain today, however, it seems an army of self-appointed censors — from internet trolls to angry students, lobby groups, town hall officials, craven politicians and lawyers and Establishment figures, as well as a host of other sanctimonious and often bilious busy-bodies — have taken it upon themselves to police what we can and cannot think or say.

Not believing in abortion, like not believing in gay marriage, is now, unquestionably, a thought crime. It was hardly surprising that the Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg recently said he did not believe in abortion, because he is a man of conviction as well as a Roman Catholic, and this is the teaching of his Church. Yet his view was treated with incredulity and disdain by everyone from trolls and women's groups to the higher echelons of the political Establishment.

As in the case of abortion, debate is no longer allowed on transgender issues. There was a BBC2 Horizon Programme last Tuesday night called Being Transgender. The close-up shots of transgender surgery in a Californian hospital will not easily leave the mind.

We met a number of nice people who had decided for one reason or another that they were not the gender which they had once supposed. They were all undergoing some form of transformative medical treatment, either taking hormones or having surgery.

What made the programme strange as a piece of journalism was the fact that it did not contain one dissenting voice. Not one psychiatrist or doctor who said they doubted the wisdom of some of these procedures, especially in the very young.

Still less was there anyone like the redoubtable feminist and academic Dr Germaine Greer who once expressed her view that a man did not become a woman just because he had undergone transgender surgery — and was, as a result, decried from the rooftops with everything from petitions launched to stop her from speaking at university campuses to death threats.

Dr Greer had also been bold enough to say 'a great many women' shared her view, which is obviously true — a great many women do not think that transgender people have really changed sex. What has changed is that it is no longer permitted to say so.

A friend of mine who likes bathing in the women's pond on Hampstead Heath in London says that at least one person now uses the female changing rooms who is obviously in a stage of transition from man to woman, and is simply a hairy man wearing lipstick.

However uncomfortable this makes the women feel, they know that they cannot say anything.

There was an ugly incident lately at Hyde Park's Speakers' Corner, which used to be the place where anyone could go and stand on a soap-box and hold any opinion they liked.

Speakers' Corner was a symbol of British Freedom of Speech. As a schoolboy, I had a Jewish friend whose grandfather used to take us there to listen to people proclaiming that the earth was flat, preachers praising Hitler, Stalin, and others saying whatever they liked. It was the freedom to do so, said the old man who had escaped Hitler's Germany, which made the very air of Britain so refreshing to him.

What would he have thought had he witnessed the scene earlier this month at Speakers' Corner when a 60-year-old woman called Maria was smacked in the face, allegedly by a transgender fanatic, while listening to a talk on planned reforms to the Gender Recognition Act. Reforms which would allow men to 'self-identify' as female, and enter women's changing rooms or refuges unchallenged.

For Maria, as for the intimidated women of Hampstead swimming pool, and for Germaine Greer, it is by no means clear that transgender people have changed their sex.

Transgender activists have labelled women like Maria TERFS — Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists. When news of the assault on her reached the internet — ie instantaneously — the trolls began baying, like the bloodthirsty mob during the guillotine-executions of the French Revolution. 'Burn in a fire, TERF'. 'I want to f*** some TERFS up, they are no better than fascists'.

The use of the word 'fascist' is commonplace in our new Dark Age for anyone with whom you happen to disagree. You hear it all the time in the Brexit arguments which rage all around us and which I dread. As it happens, I voted Remain. But I do not regard Brexiteers as 'fascists', and many of their arguments — wanting to reclaim the power to make our own laws and control our own borders — are evidently sensible.

Yet I have lost count of the number of times I have heard Remainers say that Brexiteers are fascists. As a matter of historical fact, many of the keenest supporters of a united European superstate were actual fascists.

The only British politician who campaigned on the ticket of Europe A Nation during the Fifties was Sir Oswald Mosley who was leader of the British Union of Fascists. But then, today's PC censors don't let facts get in their way of bigotry.

Branding anyone you disagree with a fascist; hitting people in the face; tweeting and blogging abuse behind the cowardly anonymity of the internet — these are the ugly weapons used to stifle any sort of debate. And it is often in the very places where ideas should be exchanged and examined that the bigotry is at its worst: our universities.

This week on the Radio 4's Today programme, we heard James Caspian, a quietly-spoken, kindly psychotherapist, describing what has become a cause celebre at Bath Spa University.

He has been working for some years with people who for one reason or another have begun the process of gender-transition, and then come to regret it.

Caspian is evidently not a judgmental man. He wanted to write a thesis on this subject from a sympathetic and dispassionate point of view.

What makes people feel so uncomfortable with their own apparent gender that they wish to undergo painful and invasive surgery to change it? What makes people then come to reassess their first idea? These are surely legitimate questions about a subject many of us can't quite comprehend.

I have two friends who started out as men, and decided in mid-life that they were really women, or wanted to become women, which is what they have done. I do not really understand what has happened to them, even though they have tried to explain it to me.

Surely a man like James Caspian, who has worked with transgender men and women, should be encouraged by a university to explain this area of medicine or psychology?

But no. The university, having initially approved of his idea for a thesis, then turned down his application. 'The fundamental reason given was that it might cause criticism of the research on social media, and criticism of the research would be criticism of the university,' he told Radio 4 listeners. 'They also added it's better not to offend people.'

This is all of a piece with students at Oxford wanting to pull down the statue of 19th century imperialist Cecil Rhodes from his old college, Oriel, on the grounds that he was racist.

Rather than having a reasoned debate weighing the evils of racist colonialism against Rhodes's benevolence, the student at the forefront of the movement — who had actually accepted a £40,000 Rhodes scholarship funded by the fortune the colonialist gave to Oxford — wanted to pull down the statue.

This is the same attitude of mind as that which led monks in the Dark Ages to destroy the statues of pagan gods and goddesses, or the Taliban to do the same to age-old Buddhist artefacts.

Reason, debate, seeing more than one side to an argument, surely these are the foundations of all that has fashioned the great values of the West since the Enlightenment started in the 18th century with an explosion of new ideas in science, philosophy, literature, and modern rational thought that ushered in the Age of Reason.

Realising that human actions and ideas are often mixtures of good and bad — isn't this what it means to have a grown-up mind? Surely we should be allowed to discuss matters without being accused of thought crime?

In universities, as at Speakers' Corner and in the public at large, there used to be the robust sense that sticks and stones may break our bones but words can never hurt us. Now, the 'hurt-feelings' card is regularly played to stifle any debate.

Little by little, we are allowing the Dark Ages of intolerance to come again. We should not be letting this happen.

We should be able to say: 'We disapprove of your views — on Europe, on Transgender Issues, on Islam, on absolutely anything, but we defend to the death your right to express them'.


 

Full article

 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4935418/A-N-WILSON-new-dark-age-intolerance.html#ixzz4uAFieZ6T
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[COMMENTS-HIGHLIGHTING - ARE OURS!]

 

SEPTEMBER 30-2017

H.F.1329

 

 

The Muslim cleric who blames British mosques for the 7/7 bombings, says multiculturalism is a disaster and would throw Islamic fanatics out

By

 Richard Pendlebury
 on 30th April 2009

 

You can usually find at least one in any saloon bar, ready to give you the benefit of their peppery views on the parlous state of Britain today.
 

This particular example is a clean shaven, middle-aged man with the de rigueur attire of carefully knotted mustard tie and blue, golf club-style blazer.
 

Brass cuff buttons flash as he pounds an angry fist on to his knee.
 

 

7/7

Terror: The bus destroyed in the 7/7 London bombings

'I will give £5 to anyone in Britain who wants to live under Sharia law,' he declares. 'It will help pay for their ticket to Sudan, Yemen, Pakistan, or wherever it is customary to live under Sharia law.

'Please, please go and leave us alone. This is Britain, not 10th century Arabia!'

We are indeed sitting in a bar, on a busy main road in Oxford.
 

But the man before me is no stereotypical Islamophobe.
 

For one, he is sipping a glass of water rather than something more inflammatory.
 

More importantly, though by no means obviously, Dr Taj Hargey is himself an Islamic cleric; perhaps the most controversial imam in Britain today.
 

In an age when the highest-profile Muslim preachers are bearded, anti-Western firebrands such as Abu Hamza or Omar Bakri Dr Hargey seems an anomaly.
 

He does not care much for male facial hair. He believes that women can be both seen and heard, even in a mosque at Friday prayers.
 

And don't even get him started on the sort of fanatics who blow up London buses, or the poisonous teachings that inspired them.
 

After three men were cleared this week on charges of assisting the July 7 bombers, there have been calls for an inquiry into blunders made by the security services.
 

But Dr Hargey has little doubt who, and what, is truly to blame for unleashing such terrorism on our streets.
 

 

'It is the extremist ideology present in many UK mosques which is the cement behind nihilistic plots such as this,' he says. 'They are twisting Islam.'

Muslim

Violence: Dr Taj Hargey deplores fanatics such as the suicide bombers who targeted London

He has little or no time for the Government's 'pussyfooting' policy of encouraging multiculturalism.
 

'That is the biggest disaster to happen to Britain since World War II,' he says. 'It has given the extremist mullahs the green light for radicalism and segregation. We have to, we must, adjust to British society. And we can do so without losing our faith.'
 

Hardly surprisingly, such statements have made him wildly unpopular among those who adhere to the brand of ultra-conservative Saudi-funded Wahhabi Islam which currently makes most noise in Britain and around the world.
 

Certainly, if you Google Dr Hargey's name you will find him vilified as a 'charlatan' on any number of Islamic website forums.
 

In return, he is quite happy to describe his critics as 'fanatics'. Recently, one hostile publication went too far.
 

When we meet, Dr Hargey, 56, is still basking in the glow of his successful libel action against the English-language Muslim Weekly newspaper, which had accused him of being a heretic.
 

Earlier this month it agreed to pay him a five-figure sum and issue a grovelling apology, which was a little more esoteric than most heard in the High Court.
 

It stated: 'Dr Taj Hargey has never subscribed to, belonged to or been affiliated with any sect or minority group, religious or otherwise. On the contrary, Dr Hargey has consistently and openly reiterated his unconditional belief in the absolute finality of prophethood in Islam and Mohammed (peace and blessings upon him) as God's last prophet and final messenger.'
 

Afterwards, the cleric described the case as a 'watershed moment' in the battle between 'progressives' such as himself and what he called the 'Muslim McCarthyists', after the U.S. senator who accused opponents of being communist and 'un-American' with little or no evidence. 

 

Muslim

Headscarves: Dr Hargey says they are not necessary

But despite his victory, or perhaps because of it, when his phone rings now it is still almost as likely to be an anonymous death threat as a request for spiritual guidance.
 

Certainly more people hate him than follow him.
 

'The masses have been brainwashed by the mullahs,' he says.
 

Which begs the question: can this intellectual Oxford imam really succeed with his ambition to lead a 'reformation' of British Islam? Or will medieval orthodoxy triumph in the end?
 

Dr Hargey was born and raised in apartheid- era South Africa. The racist state classified him as 'coloured', a second-class citizen. 

One of eight children, his father was a supermarket packer; his mother illiterate.
 

But Hargey was a natural scholar and destined for a better, if consistently controversial, existence.
 

His first battles were against the Pretoria government, rather than fundamentalists from his own faith. 

'The masses have been brainwashed by the mullahs'

The attention he received from the South African security services prefigured the intimidation and intolerance he says he receives from British extremists today: 'I was an anti-apartheid fighter, against institutionalised racism. 

'For me, Islam was a liberating vehicle for attaining justice on this Earth. I was pursued then by the South African secret police, so why should I fear these people now?'
 

Hargey attained his doctorate in Middle Eastern and Islamic studies from Oxford University. His thesis was on the slave trade in Anglo-Egyptian Sudan.
 

Back home, his CV shows that he taught history at the University of Cape Town before relocating to the U.S. in the 1980s to drum up funds for a projected South African-based anti-apartheid newspaper.
 

It is there that his efforts ran into his first experience of widely reported criticism, as allegations were made about his money-raising efforts.
 

'Prophet or Phoney?' was one newspaper headline, which, according to his critics, could equally apply to his current endeavours.
 

Whether these smears had any substance is unclear, although his combative approach has clearly attracted, if not invited, brickbats for the best part of a quarter of a century.
 

Nevertheless, he did hold down a number of academic posts in the United States, not least of which was a spell teaching African studies at the Sarah Lawrence University in New York State, alma mater of Rahm Emanuel, Barack Obama's White House Chief of Staff.
 

His latest venture is the Muslim Education Centre of Oxford, of which he is founding chairman.
 

Abu

Firebrand cleric: Abu Hamza

 

Dr Hargey also leads the city's Summertown Islamic congregation. 'The most progressive pulpit in the land, from which we do everything in English except prayer,' he states.
 

From a borrowed Masonic hall rather than a dedicated mosque, his enemies sneer.
 

The ideological core of his opposition towards the fashionable Islamic fundamentalists lies in his rejection of the absolute importance of hadith and Sharia law.
 

To explain, the Koran is the teaching of Allah, handed down to the Prophet Mohammed.
 

The hadiths, meanwhile, comprise the sayings and actions of Mohammed, as recorded by others, some time after his death.
 

For many Muslims, the hadiths are a fundamental guide and part of their faith. For Hargey, they are often unreliable and an obstacle to the integration of Islam into contemporary society. He believes the Koran is all.
 

'This is a big fight for the hearts and minds of Islam. There is nothing in the Koran which is incompatible with (living in) British society, unlike what I call "Mullah Islam" and their reliance on hadiths.'
 

And so he explains his position: 'These people say they have a right to stone adulterous women. We say show us where it says that in the Koran.
 

'The Koran must have precedence. It must be sovereign. Everything else is supplementary or subservient. All that stuff about jihad, women's rights, apostasy, all these issues come from the hadiths.
 

'We do not say get rid of the hadiths. But we do say that every hadith must pass two litmus tests.
 

First, it must not conflict with the Koran. Second, it must not conflict with reason or logic.
 

'One of the hadiths, for example, says the majority of people in Hell will be women. But let's do a forensic examination of this. First, let's look at the fact that 88 per cent of crimes are committed by men rather than women.
 

'How then, logically, can there be more women in Hell? Theologically, the Koran says that every human irrespective of gender will be rewarded for what they did and punished for what they did not.'
 

Of Sharia law he is even more dismissive. 'The Koran is clear that blasphemy is dealt with in the next life by God. The Sharia, meanwhile, is a medieval compilation of religious opinion which is not immutable, not eternal.
 

'How can we be dependant on 10th-11th-century jurists and scholars? It makes no sense.'
 

He also wants Muslims to integrate more with mainstream Britain.
 

'The (Muslim) reaction to 9/11 was to withdraw. I think the best way is to go out and belong. 

'I love this country, I follow Spurs and I go to the pub, if only to drink orange juice'

'If you met me walking down the street, for example, would you know I am a Muslim? No.
 

'I know I am a Muslim in my heart and my actions, not in my beard or the niqab face mask. The niqab only comes from a hadith and even that only refers to the Prophet's wives. This is a big fight for the hearts and minds of Islam. There is nothing in the Koran that is incompatible with (living in) British society.'
 

Of the cries of 'heretic' to which he is frequently subjected, he argues: 'Faith is between the person and God. No one can pronounce you a heretic (in Islam) and I think that is a wonderful thing.
 

'But we do need a reformation in Islam. We have to go back to the pristine principles in our faith. We need a British Islam and by that I do not mean a compromise.
 

'Christianity was once an alien faith. We have to integrate in a matter of decades rather than centuries.'
 

But what of the accusations that he is simply a State stooge? This angers him.
 

'I have called for Bush and Blair to be indicted at the international criminal court for their wars. What kind of stooge does that make me? 

'We have a multicultural community of men and women, including converts. We are not fanatics and appeal to a very broad constituency. We do not appeal to those who have been brainwashed by the mullahs.
 

These people refuse to debate with me and instead send their minions to do their dirty work on the internet or via anonymous phone calls. We get death threats, intimidation and blackmail tactics. But it does not dissuade us.
 

'Our group is based on the "Three Es": Enlightenment, Egalitarianism and Erudition.
 

But the Government, with its anti-terrorist strategy, has never contacted us, even though we say violence and suicide bombing are against the faith.
 

'What a mistake. In this city we have the Wahhabi-backed Oxford Centre of Islamic Studies. It preaches the most repressive and egregious theology.
 

'We want to establish an Oxford Centre for British Islam. We will have a mosque and the leader could be either male or female.'
 

So, for example, he has supported a state school which banned the niqab, much to the fury of his Muslim foes.
 

And last October he hosted the appearance in Oxford of Professor Amina Wadud, a female Islamic academic, who gave a sermon at Friday prayers before a mixed-gender congregation, which was anathema to the extremists.
 

Dr Hargey says: 'She is the undisputed authority on women in the Koran. We invited this heavyweight intellectual and the people who made the most protest outside our prayer hall were women dressed in niqabs who had been brainwashed by their menfolk.
 

'It was like the time of Emmeline Pankhurst and the suffragettes agitating for the vote.
 

'Then, many of the women were conditioned to think their behaviour a scandal. Now look at all those women walking past us who have the vote and think nothing of it.'
 

He also frowned on the recent extremist demonstration against the troops parading through Luton.
 

'While we feel it was an illegal war, you cannot punish the average squaddie for what is done in the name of New Labour and that toxic Texan.
 

'Yes, the war was wrong, but you cannot call soldiers murderers, or cowards. My life's work is to make British Muslims integrated.'
 

He is also utterly dismissive of the Muslim Council of Britain, which until the Government's recent reversal of policy, was the state's contact point with British Islam.
 

'They are Indo-Pakistani and sexist,' he says. 'It's a reactionary group, infused with the repressive ideology of the Wahhabis.
 

'If we go along their path we will have a ghetto mentality, segregated and giving our enemies such as the British National Party the opportunity to target us like the Jews in the 1930s. Isolation is our greatest peril.'
 

For the record, he supported BNP leader Nick Griffin's recent appearance at an Oxford Union debate, although he certainly did not endorse his views.
 

'We should not silence him. We should expose him.
 

'I love this country, I follow Spurs and I go to the pub, if only to drink orange juice. I am also a Muslim. But I am not a threat. If people like me are smothered then we will all sleep less safely in our beds.
 

'These people are religious fascists. The view that Islam is incompatible with British society is something that the Muslim Council of Britain and their hangers- on have promulgated.'
 

And with that, he adjusts the knot in his mustard tie, drains the last drop of his (non-alcoholic) drink and leaves the bar.
 

He may be a deeply controversial imam. But he is undoubtedly a brave one.

*  *  *

[ADDED SEPTEMBER 4-2017]

[WE AGREE!- THE FAILURE OF THE GOVERNMENT TO SUPPORT MODERATE MUSLIMS HAS IN 8 YEARS MADE OUR COUNTRY MORE DANGEROUS FROM FANATICAL MUSLIM EXTREMISTS WHO LOOK ON WEAKNESS OF PURPOSE AS A MESSAGE TO CONTINUE  THEIR SAVAGE WAR UNTIL ENGLAND IS AN ISLAMIC STATE. THEIR LINKS WITH SAUDI ARABIA  ARE BEYOND DOUBT AND IT IS TIME TO PUT PRINCIPLE BEFORE PROFIT. WE HAVE A FOREIGN AID PROGRAMME MISUSED AND SENDS IN THE MAIN THE MESSAGE-WASTE OF TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS ARE OF NO CONCERN OF CIVIL SERVANTS AND GOVERNMENT AND CERTAINLY NO CONCERN OF THE TAXPAYER.

IF A BUSINESS WERE TO ADOPT SUCH A POLICY OF WASTE OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES THE SHAREHOLDERS WOULD SOON BE ON THE WAR-PATH.]

Print this article Print this article

*

APRIL-2009

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 9-2014

H.F. 706

QUENTIN LETTS on Labour's Barry Sheerman Brexit bashing | Daily ...

 

Just when you thought Remainers couldn't get more patronising, up pops this snooty ninny! QUENTIN LETTS on Labour backbencher Barry Sheerman

By Quentin Letts for the Daily Mail

 October 31,2017

At the age of 77, Huddersfield’s Labour MP Barry Sheerman may not plan to stand again for re-election to the House of Commons.

We must certainly assume so given that the old booby just let slip he thinks his constituents in West Yorkshire are ill-educated. As election-winning strategies go, it is at least novel. Vote for me, thickos!

Mr Sheerman, a blowy Europhile, made his outburst during a television discussion at the weekend. Maybe the heat of the studio got to him, or over-excitement at being asked to take part in a live discussion on BBC TV’s Sunday Politics (backbencher Barry is rarely considered important enough for such invitations these days).

Talk turned to our EU referendum and Mr Sheerman closed his eyes, tilted his head and said: ‘The truth is that when you look at who voted to remain, most of them were the better educated people in our country.’ 

Disdain

If that was not la-di-dah enough for an MP whose own constituency is in an area (Kirklees) that voted by 54 per cent to leave the EU, Mr Sheerman also took a swipe at people who were educated at polytechnics.

He was cross that Conservative MP Chris Heaton-Harris has written to universities trying to find out what is being taught about Brexit.

‘This man who went to Wolverhampton Polytechnic,’ shuddered Mr Sheerman. ‘Who does he think he is? Trying to frighten my university in Huddersfield!’ The thrust of this was clear: poly-educated oiks such as Heaton-Harris have no place offering their opinion to us Varsity types.

That’s the Brexit vote and the Polytechnic vote slagged off in seconds. Good work, Barry. At this rate Theresa May will give you a knighthood for services to the Tory party.

Let us begin by trying to understand Mr Sheerman’s ‘snobbery’ — as one fellow guest in the studio put it. There is certainly data to show university graduates voted two to one in June 2016 to stay in the European Union.

Cambridge and Oxford, our best-known university strongholds, were hot for Remain. The British political, legal, media and academic elites were, and still are, markedly anti-Brexit. They clutch their necks with condescending disdain at those lower orders who voted for British independence.

It may seem unfair to pick on so slight a political figure as Barry Sheerman, a spongy middler who in the Blair years won the ‘Golden Pager Award’ for asking the most obsequious questions in Parliameny 

Mr Sheerman, it could be said, was merely stating facts when he hailed the intellectualism of the Remain camp. But it brings us up against the old truism that the longer someone has studied at university, the less clued up he or she may be. I say that as someone who attended three universities and who has often felt a hamfisted nincompoop alongside non-university friends.

Some of the quickest wits I know never went near a college campus, and many of our biggest idiots are those with fancy letters after their names.

It may seem unfair to pick on so slight a political figure as Barry Sheerman, a spongy middler who in the Blair years won the ‘Golden Pager Award’ for asking the most obsequious questions in Parliament.

In the past he has called for Buckingham Palace to be torn down (because it is one of Britain’s ugliest buildings), demanded that Britain join the Euro, and described a £7,000 pay rise for MPs as ‘pathetic’.

It probably tells you all you need to know about this sorry little man, but he’s again placed his head above the parapet, so here goes with the polemical mallet. His attitude stinks of entitlement, of patronising disdain, of a self-righteous sense of superiority over ‘the little people’. For a Labour MP — a Labour MP! — to express such views is dreadful; yet hardly surprising.

Mr Sheerman is typical of the illiberal Centre-Left which has done so much damage to this country in recent decades.

Labour sloganeering about ‘the many not the few’ is tommy-rot. They are vicious snobs and regard ‘the many’ as a herd of dumb cattle. There sits Mr Sheerman in the House of Commons, supposedly representing his constituents, yet plainly regards the majority of them as educationally inferior.

He studied at the London School of Economics, long a seed-bed of the worst sort of anti-popular, neo-elitist, pocket-filling Leftism. He has both a BSc and MSc in economics to his name. Bow down, ye voters of Huddersfield, to your twice mortar-boarded Member of Parliament.

Hail to your intellectual master, the chin-stroker, the brow-clutcher, that Erasmus de nos jours, Barry ‘the Brainbox’ Sheerman! You won’t be surprised to hear he opposes grammar schools (even though he went to one).

We don’t want the working-classes getting ideas above their stations, do we, Barry? This ninny, this snoot, this velvet-lined codpiece, Sheerman is typical of a Parliament which, with its allies in the Establishment, has gone on dirty protest about Brexit.

They kick, stamp, pout and blow bubbles about last year’s stonking, revolutionary referendum result. The Leave vote was a close but clear rejection not just of the European Union but also of the stooges and suck-ups who for years anti-democratically pushed Brussels down our throats.

Crucial

The Sheermans of this world argue that MPs are chosen by constituents to act and vote on various matters as they personally see fit. That an MP is entitled to take his or her view on, say, capital punishment, even though it may clash with majority opinion in the constituency. This, Burkean view of democracy — as argued by philosopher Edmund Burke — raises parliamentarians to the level of autonomous trustees, sent to the Commons to do as they see fit for the nation. Except, except, except . . . it is more complicated than that.

The EU referendum was not a parliamentary vote. The crucial thing was that it was beyond and above the House of Commons, and it was established as such by Parliament.

It trumped the Burkean ideal. If there was an element of trusteeship, it was that the Parliamentary class would obey the referendum’s verdict.

From Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer and Tory Dominic Grieve, to dimmer bulbs such as Mr Sheerman, Westminster’s Remainers put themselves above the majority — and pooh-pooh them as morons who ‘didn’t vote to become poorer’ or ‘didn’t vote to leave the Single Market’.

In his TV appearance, Mr Sheerman derided Conservatives for agreeing to respect the EU referendum result.
 

Theresa May will give Sheerman a knighthood for services to the Tory party if he keeps on offending voters at his current rate

Exquisite

The Tories were now ‘no longer the nasty party’ but ‘the stupid party’, he tweeted later.

Yes, how stupid of politicians to respect the will of the majority of voters in the biggest plebiscite held in our country.

The arrogance of these Remain extremists is sometimes matched only by the over-ripeness of their claims.

I recently heard Mr Sheerman claim, in the Commons, that he had met ‘not one person’ in the manufacturing or business sectors of Huddersfield or Leeds who wanted to leave the EU. He was either lying or picks acquaintances in pro-Brexit Yorkshire with exquisite hygiene.

Let us close by returning to the polling data from pro-EU areas. What exactly do those statistics from university towns tell us? Do they prove the intellectual superiority of the Remain case? Even if they did, the democratic will would surely have to prevail — unless you want riots on the street.

But might the statistics not just tell us our college populations like the world the way it is? University types, who tend to do better financially than non-degree holders, may not have wished their elitist privileges to be imperilled by change. Voting patterns may just be down to all-too human greed and protectionism.

Only a very stupid politician — such as Barry Sheerman — would fail to admit the possibility of that.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5033921/QUENTIN-LETTS-Labour-s-Barry-Sheerman-Brexit-bashing.html#ixzz4xSPznd8g
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

OCTOBER 31-2017

H.F.1365-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT- NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'SPLANNED EUDOMINATION OF EUROPE
 
 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM AUGUST 27,2005

Daily Mail

Saturday, August 27, 2005

James Slack-Home Affairs Correspondent

 

 

PUTTING extra police on the beat, cuts violent crime, robbery and burglary, figures showed yesterday.

 

The areas of London flooded with officers after the July terror attacks recorded a drop in such offences.

 

Experts said the data proved that increasing Bobbies on the beat deters criminals.

 

In the wake of the attacks, the Metropolitan Police put up to 4,000 officers on the streets of Central London at one time, including 3,000 who are armed.

 

Dramatic cuts in street crime and burglary were logged for these areas in July, compared to the same month last year.

 

In Camden, robbery was cut by 12.2 % and burglary by 8.2%.

 

Westminster recorded a 30.2% cut in burglary and a 6.9% drop in robbery.

 

This compared with increases in the London area as a whole, where violence was up 4.1 %, robbery up 22.8% and burglary 4.7%.

 

Crime expert David Green director of the Civitas think-tank, said the police response to the terror attacks had provided an ‘accidental experiment.’

 

He added: 

 

‘It reinforces the case for a proper policing policy’

 

Norman Brennan, of the Victims of Crime Trust, said:

 

‘The problem is that the numbers put on the streets following July7 are simply not sustainable. What we need now is a huge increase in police’ [Bobbies on the Beat]

 

Mr Brennan added that slashing police paperwork could also boost numbers on the beat.

 

Government statistics show police are spending 53% of their time on frontline duties.  The rest is spent stuck behind desks or attending court.

 

Mr Green added that the figures showed officers could not be concentrated in one area. Six outlying London boroughs had a 50 % jump in muggings in July compared with last year.

 

In Waltham Forest street robberies were up 92.7%.

 

[The above figures prove what we have been saying for many years that there is a need for the local bobbie to be returned to the beat where he CAN become familiar with his patch and prevent crime, which some Chief Constables say, is NOT possible.  But the events in London since 7/7 show a different picture.]

 

To continue:

 

-       Officers were shifted from those areas to boost police numbers in Central London.  [No Police –Greater Crime]

 

Commander Simon Foy, the Met’s head of performance, said:

 

‘After the 7 July and 21 July attacks we had a responsibility to have a huge police presence in Central London.’

 

[We ask the WHY? the Metropolitan Police Chief Sir Ian Blair said after the bombings that the 3000 officers sent to Edinburgh to protect the most protected man in the world had NOT been a problem for London at the time?]

 

To continue:

 

[Commander Foy said:]

 

‘We never abandoned the suburbs and we have been determined to get the ground back’.

 

[This statement contradicts itself-if the Suburbs were NOT abandoned WHY is there NOW a DETERMINATION to GET THE GROUND BACK]

 

The Independent Police Complaints Commission announced an Independent Inquiry last night into the leaks from the Jean Charles de Menezes investigation.

 

Bill Taylor, formally Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary for Scotland, will look into how documents from the Commission’s inquiry found their way into the media.

 

It follows the publication of letters to the Home Secretary from the Police Federation calling for an inquiry into the leaks.

 

[What we are sure is far more interesting to receive will be the Report on the run-up to and aftermath of July 7 in respect of the actions or otherwise of the Metropolitan Police Chief Sir Ian Blair and others under his command.]

 

*         *        

 

Crime On My Doorstep

 

A correspondent to the Letters COLUMN Of the

 Daily Mail on September 6, 2005  from a concerned citizen in Essex.

IN HIS first statement on arriving in Office in July, our new Police Chief told criminals visiting Essex to

 

‘Bring their toothbrushes because they won’t be going home’ (Mail).

 

He ordered his officers to arrest at least 600 criminals in his first week in charge.

[JULY]

 

On Thursday, August 4, after 11pm, a young man was stabbed as he walked home.  Fleeing from his attackers, he arrived at our front door, cornered by a gang of youths. 

 

My husband managed to get him inside as his assailants kicked at our front door shattering the glass with a heavy plant top.

 

My husband was threatened through the broken window, but managed to hold the door shut.

 

Meanwhile, I relayed all this to the 999 operator, explaining that we had two young children in the house.

 

The victim was bleeding profusely from a stab wound and my husband had no doubt that had he not opened the door that night, this 17-year old boy would have been seriously injured or killed by the gang, who ran off once they realised the police had been called.

Half an hour after the incident, we had a phone call from police to say there had been a sweep of the area but no one was found.

TWENTY MINUTES later another phone call said there was ‘concern for welfare’ in Benfleet and we would have to wait longer.

A police car eventually arrived two hours after the Attack

 

By which time my husband had taken the young man to Accident & Emergency.  The two officers spoke to me briefly of ABH, GBH, even attempted murder, I pointed out possible evidence on the front door.

 

I wasn’t expecting Helen Mirren and her swarm of forensic experts

 

But I thought at least I’d hear something.

 

Weeks later no one contacted my husband and no one had been to see if there is any evidence on our front door.

*

[Sounds familiar in Blairdom –where talk and spin are the order of the day and the concern for the victim is the last think that concerns them.

 

With the LAW & ORDER in a shambles possibly the only way to improve things is to have an elected Sheriff to toughen-up Law Enforcement]

 

*          *          *

[Font altered-bolding and underlining used –comments in brackets]

SEP/05

*  *  *

ADDED OCTOBER 18-2017

THE CAUSES

A LACK OF PATRIOTISM AND HONESTY

INSTEAD OF

SELF AND GREED

SO INGRAINED IN OUR 1000 YEAR DEMOCRACY OUR THE PAST 300 YEARS SINCE FOREIGN INFLUENCE USURPED OUR PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY,

WITH BILLIONS WASTED ON ILLEGAL WARS- AND THROW AWAY FOREIGN AID AND MP'S ENJOYING THEIR  SPLENDID EXPENSES AND SALARIES -PENSIONS. THE COST OF BENEFITS -NHS-HOUSING...FOR MILLIONS OF REFUGEES AND ILLEGAL MIGRANTS .     WITH A POPULATION OF OVER  51 MILLION IN ENGLAND WE NOW HEAR THAT OUR GREEN BELT WILL NOW BE BUILT ON.    LOOKING AT WHAT HAS HAPPENED OVER THE PAST DECADES IT COULD BE BETTER IF ONE JUST CHOSE ANY 600 PEOPLE (AFTER BOUNDARY CHANGE) OFF THE STREETS TO LOOK AFTER THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS IN OUR HOUSE OF COMMONS. THEY COULD HARDLY DO ANY WORSE THAN THE SHOWER WE HAVE HAD IN PARLIAMENT-WITH FEW EXCEPTIONS. THEY STAYED TOO! LONG! A ONE TERM SERVICE - BY MORE CONCERNED CITIZENS. THEY WOULD BE CHOSEN FOR THEIR PATRIOTISM AND COMMON SENSE. THEY WOULD GIVE 5 YEARS SERVICE FOR THEIR COUNTRY AND THEN RETURN TO PUBLIC LIFE, SO THEY ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE  OF AN INDEPENDENT MIND THAN THOSE WE HAVE OBSERVED THESE PAST YEARS AND MORE DEMOCRATIC FOR A COUNTRY OF ENGLAND WITH ITS DEMOCRATIC CREDENTIALS GIVEN AWAY IN 1972 BY LIES AND DECEIT LEAVING OUR COUNTRY IN THE WILDERNESS OF A DEMONIC CREATION THE EU-A TOWER OF BABEL PLANNED BY HITLER IN 1943 IN ORDER FOR GERMAN DOMINATION OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE ADDED AND ABETTED BY FRANCE AND THE USA.

READ ABOUT OUR ENEMY OF TWO WORLD WARS WITH ITS HISTORY OF CONFLICT AND CARNAGE THROUGHOUT THE AGES!-

GERMANY

OCTOBER 17-2017

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM AUGUST 27,2005

H.F.1342

Tony Blair’s legacy-the Ghettosization of England

 

[We have deviated from the undermentioned title in replacing Britain for England as the figures will show that apart from one location in Scotland and two in Wales the rest are in England.]

 

*

Asylum Map of Britain

 

by

 

Steve Doughty and Becky Barrow

 

Dispersal policy

that fostered

A nation

Of ‘ghettos’

 

HUNDREDS of thousands of

 

ASYLUM SEEKERS

 

-have been dispersed around Britain and clustered according to what languages they speak, it was

revealed yesterday.

 

*

 

[The following disclosure was anticipated nine years ago when the original Mr Nice-Guy Tony Blair told everyone he was the people’s slave but in reality he was determined to change the face of England beyond recognition as soon as he could.

 

His fanatical EU policy could only be implemented if he was able to demolish any real identity of the English people which as we know was a walkover because of the national characteristic not to get too excited about what is going on around us and that is WHY Tony Bliar signed the Treaty of Rome last year above the heads of the people of England.

 

The newcomers were looked on as compliant New Labour voters and as a consequence they were in many cases treated far more favourably than the indigenous population even of those who had already settled in the country from many parts of the world many decades ago. ]

 

To continue:

 

The Home Office policy throws together large groups of migrants from the same country or the same region of the world.

 

The system of grouping asylum seekers in towns and cities by their language was meant to protect them from ‘isolation’, officials said.

 

BUT critics voiced astonishment that the Government has been supporting policy that appears to

ENCOURAGE SOCIAL DIVISION AND SEGREGATION

 

RATHER THAN

INTEGRATION.

Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said the dispersal by language system was ‘very odd’.

 

It was begun in 2000 by Home Secretary Jack Straw. The National Asylum Support Service began to bus asylum seekers to regional towns and cities away from London and the South East, the destination preferred by the great majority.

 

Those who chose to go to London anyway, or to move from their appointed regional town, were denied free housing by the ASYLUM SUPPORT SERVICE.

 

The language system for dispersal was abandoned in April this year [2006], the Home Office insisted yesterday.

 

A spokesman said: ‘The idea was to ensure that people were not left isolated where they settled, and that they would have access to the appropriate support services.

 

‘The list is no longer in use by the Home Office, and the dispersal system is now kept under constant review.

 

The system operated under three Home Secretaries. Mr Straw, David Blunkett and Charles Clarke, and was used to choose where up to 50,000 asylum seekers a years were settled.

 

Officials called the towns and cities asylum seekers were sent ‘cluster areas’

 

But residents of the chosen towns were not told that asylum seekers directed to their districts were all from similar ethnic and cultural groups, and could therefore be expected to form separate communities.

 

The LANGUAGE MAP - revealed in leaked documents this weekend - appears to show that some groups of asylum seekers were sent to areas where there is already a community with a similar ethnic and cultural background.

 

Asylum Seekers from the Indian sub-continent were often directed to places such as Leeds, Oldham and Blackburn, which already have large Indian and Pakistani populations.

 

For other towns and cities, the language mix appears to have no guiding reasoning. Asylum support service officials do, however, give careful instructions that groups with a potential for conflict should be kept apart.

 

Serbians and Croatians, whose long enmity was deepened by the wars following the break-up of Yugoslavia in the early 1990’s [Germany recognised the independence of Croatia] were not sent to the same places.

 

Among Albanian speakers, ethnic Kosovans were separated from pothers.

 

The language system was ended this year shortly after Commission for Racial Equality chief Trevor Phillips gave his warning that British [predominantly English towns and cities] were

 

‘Sleepwalking to segregation’

 

Shadow Home Secretary Mr David Davis said:

 

‘I thought everybody appreciated that the key to good community relations is a proper level of integration.

 

‘This policy would appear to have exactly the opposite effect because it amounts to segregation. It is very odd.’

 

[Mr David Davis seems to find it ALL ‘ very odd’. With the dictionary meaning of ‘strange; queer; casual; out of the way, standing apart we would have thought much stronger language was in order but as Mr Nice-Guy-Dave has said-we mustn’t be too strong with our views of the Government.

 

’We need to remind him that it is the responsibility of Her Majesty’s Opposition to OPPOSE and had it been doing its job over the past nine years by probing vigorously Government policy on Immigration and Asylum Seekers and Foreign prisoners and the REAL reasons for the war in Iraq and much of what we now hear about might have been nipped in the bud. There is after all the

 

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

 

-which Tony Blair so kindly introduced -but he had no fear that the Tories would rock the boat with diving too deep into Government’s deeply fathomed secrets.]

 

Former Home Office immigration official Steve Moxon -who lost his job after revealing how the Home Office was breaking its own rules by rubberstamping thousands of visa applications from Eastern Europe, even if the papers were not in order -said the system was bound to deepen

 

SEGREGATION.

 

‘Migrant enclaves are all too easy to allow to grow and grow; and the larger and faster they grow, the less reason there is for individuals within them to integrate into the wider society.’ He said.

 

‘This policy only serves to create migrant ghettos.’

 

*

[A list follows of where individuals of different nationalities were sent until April 2006 which encouraged the Ghettosization of ENGLAND]

1.                      Derby: Punjabi, Hindi, Albanian, Polish, Vietnamese, English.

2.                      Leicester: Gujerati, Polish, Latvian, Ukrainian, Kishwahwahli, Swahili, Serbo Croat (Serbian only) Hindi, Mandarin, Turkish, Romanian, French, Somali, Arabic, Pushtu, Farsi, Czech, Dari, English.

3.                      Lincoln: Arabia, Bengali, Cantonese, Farsi, Urdu, Kurdish, English.

4.                      Nottingham: Gujerati, Hindi, Bengali, Albanian, Arabic, Cantonese, German, Greek, Italian, Mandarin, Polish, Portuguese, Russian. Spanish, Turkish, Urdu, Vietnamese, Farsi, French, Amharic, Kurdish, Lingala, Somali, Swahili, Tigrean, Romanian, English.

5.                      Cambridge: Bengali, Singhalese, Romanian, English.

6.                      Great Yarmouth: Dari, Hindi, Farsi, Kurdish, Punjabi, English.

7.                      Ipswich: Cantonese, Bengali, Hindi, French, Spanish, Albanian, Farsi, Pushtu, Dari, English.

8.                      Norwich: Mandarin, Tamil, Albanian, Arabic, Bengali, French, Gujerati, English, Somali, Swahili, Sorani.

9.                      Peterborough: Serbo-Croat, Pushtu, Arabic, Bulgarian, Turkish, Urdu, Somali, English.

10.             Darlington: Arabic, Farsi, Turkic, French, Punjabi, Kurdish, Lingala, Bengali, Gujerati, Somali, Swahili, Sorani, English.

11.             Gateshead: Farsi, French, Portuguese, Russian, Serbo-Croat, (not Serbian), Spanish, Turkic, Kurdish, Dari, English, Tigrean, Arabic, Swahili, Somali, Lingala, Amharic.

12.             Hartlepool: Lithuanian, Polish, Serbo-Croat, Russian, English, Arabic, Albanian, Hindi, Urdu, Farsi.

13.             Middlesborough: Albanian (Kosovo only), Tamil, Urdu, Bengali, Farsi, Kurdish, Swahili, English, French, Russian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dari, Arabic, Farsi, Hindi, Turkish.

14.             North Tyneside: Russian, Albanian, Czech, Farsi, Portuguese, English, Spanish, Belarussian, Dari.

15.             South Tyneside: Farsi, French, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Kurdish, Latvian, Lingala, Polish, Tigrean, Tamil, Arabic, Turkish, English.

16.             Newcastle: Farsi, French, Portuguese, Russian, Tamil, Spanish, Turkish, Amharic, Lingala, Arabic, English, Kurdish, Somali, Swahili, Sorani, Tigrean, Albanian, Mandarin, Urdu, Hindi, Punjabi, Bengali, Gujerayti, Dari, Pushtu.

17.             Sunderland: Farsi, French, Gujerati, Portuguese, Russian, Serbo-Croat (not Serbian), Singhalese, Spanish, Czech, Albanian, Amharic, Lingala, Arabic, Belarussian, Bengali, Dari, Hindi, Kurdish, Latvian, Lithuanian, Polish, Punjabi, Pushtu, Romanian, Tamil, Tigrean, Urdu, Turkic, Turkish, Swahili.

18.             Stockton on Tees: Punjabi, Urdu, Farsi, Arabic, English, Dari, French, Kurdish.

19.             Blackburn: Urdu, Gujerati, Punjabi, Polish, Bangla, Albanian (Kosovo only), Farsi, Arabic, Mandarin, Pushtu, Czech, Romanian, Lingala, Portuguese, Kurdish, English, Amharic, Tigrean.

20.             Bolton: Arabic, Russian, Turkish, French, Kurdish, Romanian, Pushtu, Farsi, Lingala, Amharic, Tigrean, Dari, Urdu, Polish, Somali, Swahili, French (North African), English.

21.             Burnley: Punjabi, Gujerati, Urdu, Hindi, Romanian, Mandarin, Czech, Bengali, English.

22.             Bury: Urdu, Punjabi, Polish, Cantonese, Mandarin, Arabic, Albanian (Kosovo only), Turkish, French, Farsi, Somali, Pushtu, Dari, Swahili, Farsi, English.

23.             Oldham: Urdu, Gujerati, Bangla, Pushtu, Arabic, Kurdish, Farsi, Dari, French, Swahili, English, Amharic, Tigrean.

24.             Rochdale: Urdu, Gujerati, Punjabi, Bangla, Bengali, Hindi, French, Portuguese, Spanish, Pushtu, Arabic, Kurdish, Kirundi, Dari, Swahili, Farsi, English.

25.             Liverpool: Bulgarian, Mandarin, Czech, French, Latvian, Lithuanian, Portuguese, Romanian, Somali, Spanish, Ukrainian, Urdu, Georgian, Armenian, Tamil, English.

26.             Manchester: Tigrean, Urdu, Gujerati, Punjabi, Cantonese, Mandarin, Bangla, Bengali, Arabic, Hindi, Somali, Pushtu, Farsi, Kurdish, Lingala, Amharic, Dari, French, Mongolian, polish, Russian, Swahili, Tamil, English.

27.             Salford: Arabic, Albanian (Kosovo only), Czech, Tamil, Somali, Ukrainian, Kurdish, Farsi, Lingala, Tigrean, Dari, French, Swahili, English.

28.             Wigan: Albanian (Kosovo only), Russian, Turkish, Arabic, Farsi, Dari, French, English.

29.             Glasgow: Pushtu, Dari, Albanian, Mandarin, Farsi, Arabic, Kurdish, Estonian, Russian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian, Georgian, Punjabi, Urdu, Somali, French, Singhalese, Tamil, Turkish, Serbo-Croat (not Serbian), English, Swahili.

30.             Brighton: Mandarin, Hindi, Arabic, French, Somali, Swahili.

31.             Hastings and St Leonard’s: Hindi, Mandarin, Turkish, Russian, French, Portuguese, Albanian, Spanish, Romanian, German, English, Farsi, Sorani, Dari, Tigrean, Pushtu, Arabic, Fula, Aramaic, Somali.

32.             Portsmouth: Mandarin, Bengali, Hindi, French, Portuguese, Arabic, Albanian, Polish, Romanian, English.

33.             Southampton: Pushtu, Dari, Tamil, Punjabi, Urdu, Czech, Somali, Arabic, Farsi, Turkic, Kurdish, Russian, Turkish, English.

34.             Bristol: Kishwali, Somali, Mandarin, Vietnamese, Pushtu, Polish, Romanian, Spanish, Czech, Bulgarian, Arabic, Kurdish, Badnani, Sorani, Farsi, Turkish, French, French (North African), Albanian, English.

35.             Exeter: Farsi, Dari, Pushtu, English.

36.             Gloucester: Mandarin, Hindi, French, Swahili, Serbo-Croat (not Serbian), Arabic, Dari, Pushtu, Czech, Russian, Albanian, Gujerati, Urdu, English.

37.             Plymouth: Arabic, Hindi, mandarin, Hakka, Cantonese, Portuguese, French, Albanian (Kosovo only), Serbo-Croat (Bosnia only), Urdu, Turkish, Kurdish, Czech, Polish, Thai, Farsi, Somali, Spanish, Russian, English.

38.             Cardiff: Somali, Arabic, French, Farsi, Urdu, Bengali, mandarin, Cantonese, Kurdish, English.

39.             Swansea: Bengali, Punjabi, Arabic, Cantonese, Urdu, Farsi, Albanian, Hindi, Italian, Japanese, Turkish, Czech, Slovak, Polish, Kurdish, Sorani, Russian, Somali, English.

40.             Birmingham: Albanian, Arabic, Bengali, Farsi, Swahili, French, Tamil, Hindi, Kurdish, Pushtu, Russian, Turkic, Urdu, Vietnamese, Serbo-Croat (not Serbian), Somali, Spanish, Portuguese, Dari, Punjabi, English.

41.             Coventry: Albanian, Romanian, Arabic, Farsi, Swahili, French, Tamil, Hindi, Urdu, Punjabi, Gujerati, Bengali, Czech, Kurdish, Lingala, Polish, Portuguese, Somali, Dari, German, Pushtu, Italian, Russian, Spanish, Turkish, Serbo-Croat (not Serbian), English.

42.                   Stoke: Urdu, Turkish, Russian, Polish, Tigrean, Amharic, Arabic, Kurdish, Sorani, French, English.

43.                   Solihull: Kurdish, Arabi, Farsi, French, Lingala, Albanian, Pushtu.

44.              Wolverhampton: Farsi, Pushtu, Dari, Albanian, Hindi, Urdu, Kurdish, Arabic, Bengali, Estonian, Portuguese, Russian, Somali, Greek, French, Spanish, Serbo-Croat (not Serbian), Turkish, Pashai, German, Gujerati, Tamil, Latvian, Punjabi, Polish, Swahili, English.

45.              Barnsley: Albanian, Russian, Romanian, Czech, Farsi, Macedonian, Italian, Serbo-Croat (Bosnia only), Kurundi, Kinyarwanda, Shona, Ndebele, Spanish Azeri, English.

46.              Bradford: Bengali, German, Hindi, Italian, Pushtu, Polish, Punjabi, Russian, Serb-Croat, Urdu, Farsi, Kurdish, French, Czech, Dari, Ukrainian, Arabic, Slovak, Swahili, English.

47.              Kirklees: Bengali, Hakka, Farsi, Hindi, Kurdish, Cantonese, Mandarin, Pujabi, Urdu, Serbo-Croat (Bosnia only) Swahili, French, English.

48.              Doncaster: Albanian, Urdu, Punjabi, Farsi, Turkish, Cantonese, Mandarin, English.

49.              Grimsby: Albanian, Cantonese, Mandarin, Polish, English.

50.              Hull: Albanian, Kurdish, Pushtu, Farsi, Arabic, Cantonese, Mandarin, Hakka, English.

51.              Leeds: Arabic, Bengali, Mandarin, Hindi, Polish, Albanian, Farsi, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Punjabi, Somali, Urdu, Spanish, Shona, Ndebele, Swahili, Tigrean,

52.              Rotherham: Punjabi, Urdu, Arabic, Albanian, Farsi, Portuguese, French, English.

53.              Sheffield: Somali, Arabic, Dutch, Farsi, Bengali, Mandarin, Hakka, Cantonese, French, Urdu, Pushtu, Punjabi, Swahili, Portuguese, Spanish, Albanian, Kurdish, English.

54.              Wakefield: Albanian, Farsi, Kurdish, Sorani, Kurmanji, polish, Romanian, Urdu, Punjabi, French, English.

 

 

* * *

[Well at least Tony Blair can obtain a translator

should he need one when he is embarking on another illegal war in some other part of the Globe.]

 

* * *

JUNE/06

 

 

H.F.730
 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM:Daily Mail Friday, December 1,2006

 

Mr Nice Guy Dave follows Gordon Brown's collectivist policies.

 

( and wouldn't face CBI because a photo opportunity in Iraq will please his spin doctor.)

*

 Cameron has fallen in to the poverty trap

By

Andrew Alexander

*

 

Daily Mail Friday, December 1,2006

 

DAVID CAMERON  was probably wise to decide  that Iraq was a less dangerous place than this week's CBI annual conference.

There was the hazard of a tepid reception and the near certainty of being outclassed by Tony Blair.

And after all, what would he have talked about?

How much he admires Polly Toynbee , or how little he wants to cut taxes, or his new obsession with

'Relative' Poverty,

Windmills for all

-or what?

Instead, the CBI listened with a palpable lack of enthusiasm to the Tory stand-in, Shadow Chancellor [certainly only a shadow of a real chancellor] George Osborne (who like his boss has never really had a proper job).

He uttered vague pleas about the environment, social responsibility and flexible working should look at its 'Quality of Life' working group. It is seriously considering the merits of introducing a 35-hour working week and invites views. (I am not making this up).

An Ingenuous defence from Tory HQ for Cameron's absence was that, you see, he was showing he was not in the pocket of BIG BUSINESS.  Given the party's stretched finances, its treasurers may tremble.

We must marvel at the very existence of the Quality of Life working group. Is there any commodity left which politicians do not want to get their hands on?

You can guess how it would turn out with a Conservative government. There would be a Quality of Life Minister who would start by sending out targets to businesses and public bodies about employee 'satisfaction', leisure time and fringe benefits (just fill in this 75-page survey, PLEASE!)

Later would come guidance and finally legislation.

 

I am not joking -

though you might, admittedly regard the suggestion of the Tories actually coming to POWER as a FRIVOLITY.

HOWEVER, it is the decision to embrace so warmly the concept of relative poverty which is most mischievous. In a world rich in futile and misleading statistics, few are more misused or misleading than this The concept is philosophically intellectually and statistically flawed.

[In a nut-shell the whole essence of 'relative poverty' is nothing more than an opportunity to bribe as to get their vote. They wont instead give a realistic pension because then the STATE would have no excuse to intrude where it was not wanted.  Over the past nine years The Servant has now become the Master and we are all paying for it in many different ways which fits in with the tripartite policies in Westminster.]

I do not know who launched the measurement of relative poverty, but he was either very clever or very silly (sometimes the same thing unfortunately). It has established an industry whose prospects are literally eternal. It gives new meaning to the old saying that the poor are always with us.

The Government's line is that 'households' on 60 per cent of the median income level are in 'relative poverty'. That works out at just under £11,000, given a median of 18,000 a year - in both cases, note, after tax.

Below that level all sorts of complex benefits can kick in. Indeed, recent figures show that even the well-off may be feeding on Chancellor Gordon Brown's cat's cradle of welfare payments.

 

But questions arise about setting this universal figure.

WHO GETS IT

-where and at what age?

The Government defines a household for no obvious reason as containing two adults.  However, if they are unemployed, on long-term sickness benefit, students, recent school leavers or fresh arrivals from Lithuania, you would not expect them to have other than low incomes, would you?

 

And you could well have someone below the supposed poverty line in Lancashire enjoying a significantly higher standard of living than someone in London well clear of the line but harassed by the costs of accommodation and commuting.

 

You can have a household enjoying all the appurtenances of modern life -

 central heating, [YES!] dishwashers, [NO!] computers,[YES!] colour TV sets [YES!] exotic mobile phones [NO] and foreign holidays [No!- only a few days at Hay-in-Wye.]

and enjoying a living standard beyond their dreams a generation or two ago, but nevertheless classified as in poverty. [YES!]

Genuine poverty and relative poverty have nothing to do with each other.

If a burst of prosperity doubled the income of everyone, the number in relative poverty would remain unchanged.

 

And Cameron, Osborne and of course St. Polly would still be complaining.

To reduce the number below the poverty line, you can either reduce the incomes of those above the line or increase the incomes of those below. THE former would need higher taxation.

 

THE latter would mean yet another lurch into incredibly complex benefits system. With the Government now spending more on WELFARE than on EDUCATION and almost as much as on the NHS, the cost to the EXCHEQUER could be murderous.

And as we already know , it would leave the unemployed and long -term sick with an ever-decreasing incentive to return to work.

Chancellor Gordon Brown seems incapable of getting the point. In next week's pre -Budget report he will still be banging on about his' relative poverty ' targets

WHY the TORY PARTY should want to follow him down that obstacle-laden path remains a MYSTERY.

*          *          *

['relative poverty' is a means of sharing the increased wealth of the nation. UK PLC unfortunately wastes £billons every year which if invested in the correct manner would provide the higher standard of living. Businesses can go bankrupt but countries simply hand over their debts to future taxpayers.

As we have said on a number of occasions if members of Parliament could ONLY serve ONE TERM  in OFFICE they would not be under pressure to vote through such a great deal of destructive legislation and any losses made during that term would be laid at those responsible -the current place-holders. They would then truly be the Servants of the People. At present the Chancellor of the Exchequer can take decisions which will place UK PLC in greater debt in the years to come in order to be Santa with his red box held high. If he had to hand over his red box at the end of one term of Office and explain his expenditure he would not be so generous with the taxpayer's  money mainly from the South East who contribute 11 billion a year to other regions .  [D.Mail -Steve Doughty] Research has revealed that 65 per cent of the economy in the North East depended  on the STATE.

Remember this was the Region that was bribed with Government slush money to say YES! to being an EU Regional Assembly backed by Big Business -local councillors and all the hangers 'on who thought they were on a winner with a job for life . And 57 per cent in the North -West also depended on the STATE.  Fortunately the people of that area though they have accepted their good fortune decided that they preferred ENGLAND and not a Province of the corrupt unaccountable and despotic monstrosity the European Union.

Anyone can run a business even UK PLC if it can keep its associated companies afloat by borrowing until many years in the future. But the shareholders would have something to say.  In England in November 2006 we have the highest TAXES in Europe and as we have just illustrated two-thirds of the country is sovietised and has given business opportunity the red card.

What we have is the biggest bribery of the British people for their vote in a country where Pensioners are denied home help as councils plead poverty.

Do you suffer from the absence of a bobby-on-the -beat possibly it has been years since you saw such a miraculous sighting.

ONLY Proportional Representation will address the problems of the buying of votes with the inheritance of future generations. When the bird flue arrives sooner than later and takes it toll there will be considerably less  for the South East to contribute to the stability of the rest of the country and the enormous cost of the emergency will make those who survive an object lesson of what real POVERTY will LOOK LIKE.

*          *          *

DECEMBER/06

*

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM:Daily Mail Friday, December 1,2006

H.F.1349

 

 

History is the best cultivator of true Patriotism

 

 

Over 20 centuries of the Christian Era  is behind us and further back other eras. We draw on the accumulated experience of those centuries.

 

'This I think is true of History. It enables us to regard modern problems with eyes that look backward as well as forward. This is how many would-be reformers and so-called politicians go hopelessly wrong. They don't know History. [You all know who we have in mind in 2006]

 

They launch out into schemes, build up fine theories, institute far-reaching measures, which, had they but studied the annals of other ages, they would know to be futile or dangerous, because they ran counter to human nature of economic history, or a nation's inherited character.

'History is the best cultivator of true patriotism for if we read the long struggles by which their rights when we realize that the liberties we now enjoy [only just in 2006] and perhaps prize too lightly, [As is an English characteristic  which is being aroused  December 2006], cost the blood of heroes and martyrs; when we remember the brave deeds done on British soil, the great hearts that have beat in our country's cause, the noble men and women who have lived and walked to make the British man glorious -we feel pride of race that has no meanness, and  if we have a spark of native fire, we shall make a secret resolution, not to let that name be dragged into the dirt of infamy.

And History will temper this patriotism with a restraining influence, bidding us reverence the traditions of other nations, teaching us that patriotism should not be narrowing and insular. but shall go hand in hand with the world-wide fellowship of common charity, not judging every nation by our own standard, nor thinking that because a thing is British it is right, because it is foreign it is wrong but rather giving us the desire to learn and profit from all that is best among other people in other lands, and to stamp out all that compares unfavorably in our own national character.'

[Philip Gibbs-1903]

In every corner of our island there are places with names which bring to mind the history of our forefathers and their fight for their freedom and liberty and those who have no time for History and Blunder on with their mistaken and devastating actions in the early years of the 21st century will ultimately fail  as they always will who fail to take the people with them in total disregard to their historical inheritance.

At the time these words were written the British Empire was a reality today in December 2006 the Empire is long past and it is England which now finds itself threatened with extinction. If only the Media and Press would put aside their blindness to the state of a once proud and just nation State and mention the forbidden name of England which as we all know has been written off the map of the United States of Europe -thankfully but that is no reason that a nation state with  1,500 years in the making should be ignored by those who claim to represent the 87 per cent of the population of our shared island and yet the name England is avoided when ever possible -sometimes it is referred to as 'Elsewhere'

Our sister nation states of Wales and Scotland have their nationhood and it about time that England claimed its right with its own

English Parliament

AT

WESTMINSTER.

*          *          *

DECEMBER/06

H.F.1368--A28
 
 
 
 
 

[AT LONG! LONG! LAST!

- WE LEAVE

THE

CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-GODLESS EU

 IN MARCH 2019.]

*

DAILY MAIL

-At last, Hammond's on board with

BREXIT

and the

REMOANERS are DEAD and BURIED

LEAVING THE EU IN MARCH,2019

 

THE

DOMINIC

LAWSON

Column

 

By DOMINIC LAWSON

 

Finally, it’s sorted. Until yesterday, the anti-Brexiteers known as Remoaners had high hopes of Philip Hammond, the Chancellor.

His statement on The Andrew Marr Show last month that failure to reach an amicable deal with the EU ‘would be a very, very bad outcome for Britain’ was seen as an attack on his Brexiteer colleagues in the Cabinet (and, indeed, on the Prime Minister).

But yesterday he appeared as joint author of a newspaper article with the most adamantine Brexiteer in the Cabinet, the International Trade Secretary Dr Liam Fox. The two supposed foes declared that in March 2019, Britain would not just be leaving the EU but also ‘we will leave the Customs Union and be free to negotiate the best trade deals around the world as an independent, open, trading nation’.

Although the Cabinet Brexiteers were content with Hammond’s proposal that there should be a transition period after March 2019, pending a final settlement of the country’s arrangements with the EU, the Chancellor had given the impression he was bending to the demands of the CBI that Britain remain within the Customs Union during that unspecified period.

Blunder

This they regarded as a fatal blunder — and not just because they suspected the CBI (which had campaigned for Britain to give up sterling for the euro) of seeking to keep the UK in the EU ‘by the back door’.

As Shanker Singham, chairman of the special trade commission of the Legatum Institute (a group consulted regularly by the Government), warned last week: ‘The UK must be able to provide the clarity of being outside the Customs Union on Day 1 of Brexit.

If such clarity does not exist, then other countries will not think the UK is serious about executing an independent trade policy and they will quickly lose patience and move on.’...

...In any case, the nation has not changed its collective mind since the referendum in June 2016. If anything, views have hardened in the direction set by the result. A survey of 3,293 people published on Friday by the London School of Economics showed that even those who had voted ‘Remain’ would prefer the sort of Brexit deal the LSE’s team described as ‘hard’.

A total of 51.3 per cent of Remain voters backed a Brexit deal which delivered ‘full control’ over immigration and led to lower numbers of migrants from the EU. No fewer than 54.7 per cent of Remainers said that the UK should ‘pay nothing’ to the EU by means of a ‘divorce bill’.

And 52.2 per cent of Remainers told the LSE researchers that we should entirely free British law from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Unsurprisingly, a still higher proportion of self-identifying ‘Leave’ voters supported what the LSE termed

‘hard Brexit’.

Monstrous

This clearly disappointed the most voluble critic of the Brexiteers on the Tory parliamentary benches, Anna Soubry. In her own newspaper article yesterday, she lamented ‘a sense of resignation among most people who voted Remain that we have to “man up” and make the most of what we know will be a rotten Brexit’...

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4787508/At-Hammond-s-board-Brexit.html#ixzz4pkbL1fqi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

AUGUST 14, 2017

H.F.1281 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 

Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

 

*

 

A further article from the ONLY sole INDEPENDENT world-wide respected International Currency Review under the heading:

 

*

 

*

CAN BRITAIN WITHHOLD ITS EC CONTRIBUTIONS?

 

PERTINENT LEGAL ADVICE BY LEOLIN PRICE, QUEEN’S COUNSEL

 

The following Legal Opinion was provided by the distinguished veteran constitutional lawyer, Leolin Price QC, in response to a request to consider the following questions:

1. )  Can ministers of the Crown be held culpable for the misuse of UK taxpayers’ money (i.e., of UK Government funds) by the European Commission and/or European Union; and

2. ) Can Britain withhold its contributions to the EC budget on the ground that UK taxpayers’ funds are being misused (embezzled, defrauded, misappropriated, misallocated, misrepresented, etc)? But in reality, these questions are themselves superfluous since, as exposed in this issue [of International Currency Review-Vol 30,4 dated October 10-2005, cstory@worldreports.org

 

  Britain’s EU membership was procured fraudulently, so that under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Britain has every right to leave the EU unilaterally and to cease payment.

 

1.    I preface this Opinion by acknowledging that I am not aware of any precedent for the sort of proceedings in court against Ministers of the Crown, whether civil or criminal, which I am asked to consider.

2.                  But there are two relevant principles of English law to be borne firmly in mind: first, that the King (or Queen) can do no wrong [We must make it clear at the outset that this does not include King Tony-whatever he may think]; secondly, that every subject of the Queen is subject to the RULE OF LAW and equal before the law.  There is no special privilege or status for Ministers or other officers of the Crown.

 

They are vulnerable and ought to be answerable in our courts if something which they have done is not properly authorised by law, infringes the rights of individuals and causes damage.

3.There is also learning about when an officer of the Crown can plead, as a defence to a claim by someone who has suffered from some act of that officer, that what was done was an ‘Act of State’.  A British subject cannot sue the Queen (because the ‘Queen can do no wrong’); and if an act, of which a British subject complains of, is in civil law, a tort, the officer cannot assert that the act complained of was an act, which had been authorised by the Crown (in reality the Government).

 

The Act of State is not available to the officer in that situation.  He must, if he can, show that what was done was a lawful exercise of some power lawfully conferred by

Act of Parliament

Or

Otherwise:

 

See, for example, Johnson v Peglar [1921] 2AC 262.

 

4.)             But a somewhat different line of modern authority R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p Smedley [1985] AC657 recognises that a person – in ex p Smedley, a British taxpayer and elector – may have a ‘sufficient interest’ to bring judicial review proceedings against Government authorities and Ministers.

 

·    Can Ministers of the Crown be held culpable for the misuse of taxpayers’ money (i.e. of UK Government funds) by the European union?

5.)             This is the first – and primary – question on which I am asked to advise [Leolin Price, Queen’s Counsel]

6.)             My answer is that our Courts will not recognise that any direct responsibility is imposed by Government or the Chancellor of the Exchequer for the subsequent application, by the Commission of the European Communities Act or the EU, of our taxpayers’ money which is paid over in accordance with the established legal procedures for making our contributions to the European Union.

7.)             But the history and circumstances of fraud, at the centre of the European Union and in ‘Member States’, and the conspicuous failure of the Commission or the European Union to establish any proper (and obviously necessary) accountancy controls over what happens to the money which is provided by ‘Member States’, has produced a situation in which the British elector and taxpayer may reasonably consider that it is a failure of duty for the Government, Chancellor of the Chequer and treasury to go on handing over our money to what he may reasonably consider is an organisation which is incapable of doing and unwilling to do, anything effective about the corrupt and fraudulent diversion of EU funds.  The history of incapacity and unwillingness includes the following:

(1)    The resignation of the whole Commission upon its acknowledgement of collective responsibility for corruption and fraud.

(2)    In spite of that admission of collective responsibility, the continuation in office of all but one of the resigned Commissioners.

(3)    A continuing failure to establish a minimum of accounting controls over the Commission’s expenditure of money at the centre or within ‘Member States’

(4)    Failure by the Commission, in response to acknowledged and massive misuse of EU money, to establish any regime with a minimum of efficiency and designed in accordance with modern accountancy standards to monitor the expenditure of EU money and to minimise its misuse.

(5)    The apparent inability of the Commission to prevent, or reasonably to combat and control, the corrupt and fraudulent misuse of EU money, including contributions from the United Kingdom.

 

8.           Faced with that history, a UK elector and taxpayer could reasonably expect his Government to suspend, wholly or partly, the further contribution of money from the United Kingdom to the European Union in the continuing absence of proper EU accountancy and controls to combat and contain fraud and corruption and other misuse of EU money; and could reasonably expect English Courts to support his claim for such suspension.

9.           In the circumstances, and before the next instalment of the UK contribution to the EU is to be paid, a UK taxpayer could apply for permission to bring judicial review proceedings challenging the making of the payment on the ground that no responsible Minister of Department of OUR Government could regard it as appropriate to pay over money without any reasonable expectation or even hope that the recipient EU institutions have made any reasonable arrangements to avoid its being, with other EU money, misused.  Experience, especially experience since the collective resignation of the Commission [in 1999], indicates that the money so contributed will be at serious risk of not being used for the purposes for which our Treaty obligations and our law require it to be contributed [sic].

10.  Will such judicial review proceed -ings be successful? The practical and realistic answer is that the [English] Courts will be reluctant to permit the review; but there is a presentable argument, and although there is no previous reported case which provides a precise precedent, it represents a logical development of what has been recognised in reported cases; and the continuing scandal about misuse of EU money provides ground for seriously contending that judicial review ought to be, and is, available to stop exposing UK money to the obvious risk of EU failure to avoid misuse.

11.      The withholding of Treaty-required contributions, which are at serious risk of not being properly used for Treaty purposes, is not-or arguably, is not- a breach of Treaty obligations. [Editor; However as is shown in this issue – of International Currency Review Vol 30,4 the treaty obligations themselves are not applicable,

since the

British Accession Treaty, and collective treaties, were signed for corrupt reward by agents of a Foreign Power.]

12.  The argument will be that the Chancellor of the Exchequer, as a Crown servant, is a guardian of taxpayers’ money and it is a breach of the duties involved in that guardianship to pay over money which, in the hands of the recipient Commission and the EU, will be at such serious risk of misuse.  The First defence will be that the payment is required by our Treaty obligations and by Acts of Parliament; but the answer to that is that the Treaty obligations and Parliament provide authority for payment to support Treaty purposes and NOT to expose the money to established and substantial risk of misuse.

13.   An alternative form of proceedings might be criminal proceedings against the Chancellor for misuse of public money under his control.  The argument for this is that the payment is a serious breach of public duty:  it condones and encourages and facilitates the misuse, and the misuse is foreseeable.  Those instructing me may consider it worthwhile attempting such a criminal case; and it may be that the launching of such a criminal case will achieve judicial discussion of the public duty and its breach.  It is, nevertheless, my opinion that such criminal proceedings will not be successful.

14.      , The better choice of proceedings is judicial review.

 

19th October 2004.

Leolin Price CBE QC,

10 Old Square,

Lincoln’s Inn,

London.

  [Font altered-bolding & underling used-comments in brackets]

 

*         *          *

NOV/05

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

 

 

  [BROUGHT FORWARD FROM NOVEMBER 2005.]

 

H.F.1295-FREEDOM IS OUR RIGHT!

Channel 4's Jon Snow admits he was WRONG on Brexit and is part of out-of-touch 'elite'

CHANNEL 4 newsreader Jon Snow has admitted that he “got it wrong” on Brexit and belongs to a metropolitan “elite” that is out of touch with the public.

By

The veteran broadcaster said he was “comfortably with the elite” and had “little awareness” of those who are not.

Snow told executives at the Edinburgh TV Festival that they were also part of the elite “by definition”.

He said: “We have, by the nature of our business, an obligation to be aware of, connect with, and understand the lives, concerns and needs of those who are not.

“I believe we are in breach of that obligation – that in increasingly fractured Britain, we are comfortably with the elite, with little awareness, contact, or connection with those who are not of the elite.”

Jon Snow PA / GETTY

Jon Snow admitted he belongs to a metropolitan elite and doesn't understand people like Nigel Farage

Related articles

Speaking about Brexit, Snow said: “Over this past year, we – me included – mostly London-based media pundits, pollsters and so-called experts got it wrong.

“The Brexit referendum, we got that wrong. Trump defied completely so-called experts, pundits and journalists alike.”

The broadcaster also spoke out against Facebook, calling it a “dark, cancerous” force which threatens democracy by prioritising “fakery on a massive scale”.

He accused the social media giant of not living up to its “moral duty” to promote truth over popularity.

*

'Joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.'

St Luke[15:7]

*

'The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything.' [Speech at Mansion House, 24 Jan, 1899]

E. J. PHELPS. [1822-1900]

*

H.F.1287 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT!
 THE CHOICE IS YOURS!

 

CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION-IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE_WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE

 

 CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE**** GAMBLING AND ETHICS****CHRISTIANITY,THE PEOPLE, AND ETHICS****IMMIGRATION POLICY**** CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION-IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE_WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE****CHRISTIAN BELIEFS UNDER ATTACK BY EU'S PARLIAMENT IS INTELLECTUAL NAZISM**** A DEFENCE OF CHRISTIANITY BY A ONCE AGNOSTIC****WHO CARES ABOUT MORALITY****DEMOCRACY WITHOUT MORALITY AND RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUALITY IS DESPOTISM****THE WORLD IS DIVIDED INTO MANY RELIGIOUS CIRCLES OF INFLUENCE****THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY****CHRISTIAN PARLIAMENTARIAN SPEAKS ON TAX BILLS-FOREIGN POLICY-PEACE-AND THE POWER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS****OURS MIGHT BE A STRONGER AND HAPPIER SOCIETY IF CHRISTIANS WERE READIER TO DEFEND THEIR VALUES****SUNDAY SCHOOL CAN SAVE CHILDREN FROM DELINQUENCY-SAYS BISHOP****OUR CHRISTIAN FESTIVAL OF EASTER WHICH MANY KNOW SO LITTLE AND SOME NONE****

AN AGE WHEN ALL FAITHS ARE EQUAL-EXCEPT CHRISTIANITY****

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN-by -MICHAEL NAZIR ALI-BISHOP OF ROCHESTER-DEC-2006****

 

WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY

 

O COME ALL YE FAITHFUL…

EXCEPT CHRISTIANS.

 *

Multicultural polices have effectively divided the population into ethnic and faith communities.

 More!

ALFRED CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH

 

[WITHOUT A MORAL PERSPECTIVE IN POLITICS THE PEOPLE ARE TREATED NO BETTER THAN SLAVES. THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES ARE SUPPORTED BY THE SAME CORRUPT FINANCIAL INTERESTS-WHETHER IT IS

LEFT-RIGHT-CENTRE. . .

MOB RULE HAS EXISTED FOR WELL OVER 2000 YEARS-IT IS NOTHING NEW AND LOOKING A THE STATE OF OUR NOW RETURNED NATION STATE OF ENGLAND IN JUNE 2017 WE APPEAR TO HAVE LEARN'T NOTHING IN THAT TIME.

WE HAVE FOREIGN INTERESTS EMBEDDED IN OUR COMPLETE POLITICAL SYSTEM WHICH PREVENT THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY FROM PURSUING VITAL REFORM. WHETHER IT IS ISRAEL OR SAUDI ARABIA...WE ARE TOLD THE WORLD IS CHANGING AS THE BLOOD THIRSTY FINANCIAL JACKALS WHO HAVE BEEN IN PLACE FOR CENTURIES ARE NOW GETTING THEIR COMEUPPANCE FOR A CHANGE. IT WAS STATED NOT SO LONG AGO THAT EXTREME

VIGILANCE!

OF OUR

CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY

WAS ESSENTIAL.

UNFORTUNATELY THE GREATER NUMBER OF THE PEOPLE HAD OTHER MATTERS ON THEIR MIND AND AS A RESULT WE HAVE SPENT OVER 45 YEARS IN HITLER'S PLANNED COLLECTIVIST UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-GODLESS EU.

 

 

H.F.1238 A CHRISTIAN CULTURE COUNTRY EMBEDDED OVER 1500 YEARS

 

WE HEAR THAT 80% OF CONSERVATIVE MPs ARE COMMITTED FRIENDS OF ISRAEL- DAILY MAIL THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 9,2017.

 WE HAVE ASKED ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS OVER THE PAST WHY OUR GOVERNMENTS WERE NOT

FRIENDS OF ENGLAND

BECAUSE IT HAS TAKEN 45 YEARS SINCE WE VOTED NO! IN 1975 FOR THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHO LIED ABOUT OUR TRUE COMMITMENT TO HITLER'S PLAN DOMINANCE OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE.

TO HAVE A REFERENDUM AND ONLY WHEN THE ELITE TORIES THOUGHT IT WOULD GO THEIR WAY TO A DEEPER ENMESHMENT INTO THE EU SUPER-STATE. THEY MISJUDGED THE TRUE DOWN-TO-EARTH PEOPLE OF ENGLAND-AS IT WAS THEY WHO SAVED THE UNION.

WE CAN HOPE NO BETTER WITH THE LABOUR PARTY WITH THEIR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL BODY THOUGH DECRIED MUCH LATELY IS STILL IN ACTION . ALAS! THE TRUE LABOUR PARTY OF THE SHIRES DIED DECADES AGO AS WITNESSED BY THE HUGE BREXIT VOTE.

OUR SUPPOSED CLOSEST ALLY THE USA WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN OUR ENTERING THE EU TO GIVE GERMANY A HAND .IT IS COMPLETELY UNDER THE ISRAELI LOBBY-HAS BEEN FOR OVER A HUNDRED YEARS.

AS WE HAVE STATED OUR GOVERNMENT SHOULD ENDEAVOUR TO BE ON FRIENDLY RELATIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTS -AS

WINSTON CHURCHILL

HAD STATED MOST VOCIFEROUSLY IN THE PAST:

 JAW JAW NOT WAR WAR!

News for DAILY MAIL-OUT OF THE SHADOWS THE POWERFUL FIXER BEHIND HER DOWNFALL by Andrew Pierce


Daily Mail
Andrew Pierce profiles the influential Lord Polak
Daily Mail - 13 hours ago
Out of the shadows, the powerful fixer behind Priti Patel's downfall: ANDREW
PIERCE profiles ... By Andrew Pierce for the Daily Mail ... He was also with her in
the two further undisclosed meetings in New York and Parliament 
 

 

[As on many other occasions over the past decades when we have shown details of Israeli intelligence and the connection with F O I . we have received many visits from their obedient servants who do not hide their NATIONAL identity.

 But this is ENGLAND

and such individuals should know their place and do their work without waving their FLAG!-MI5 need to keep them in place or is there nothing they can do-or must it be as CIS WHERE ISRAEL REIGNS?]
 

JEW WATCH

 

H.F.1373 FRIENDS TO ALL- BUT COMMITTED TO NONE!

 

 

 Why is Obama telling us

TO GIVE UP OUR SOVEREIGNTY

when HE'D never

 SURRENDER

 a Drop of HIS OWN?

by

Stephen Glover

for the

 Daily Mail


 
EXTRACT

 

Selfish

... Why is America, which so zealously defends her own sovereignty and independence, so blind to Britain's predicament. Why does she urge us to accept shared arrangements which her own history of rugged self-determination would lead her to reject?

*

[REASON

The USA is ruled by the

The Israeli Lobby

 and David Cameron and his CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS of ISRAEL (CFI) has called  in the greatest prize of Israel - the USA to prevent ENGLAND from being

SET FREE from SLAVERY.]

The answer is that the United States is being selfish and thinking only of what is best for HER. This is hardly surprising. It's what countries do. Though America is our closest and most reliable ally, there have been several occasions in the past half-century or so when she has overridden or ignored British Interests.

For example, after the Anglo French invasion of Suez in 1956, President Eisenhower forced British and French troops to withdraw humiliating Britain and ending her status as a major Middle- Eastern power. Eisenhower later regretted what he had done.

[Reason

It had always been the aim of the USA to destroy British influence in the Middle East even before

WORLD WAR ONE.- OIL! and INFLUENCE.]

*

And when American forces invaded Grenada in 1983, much to the dismay of the British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, the Reagan administration couldn't care less that the tiny Caribbean island was a member of the Commonwealth and its head the Queen.

Reason

POWER!

 

*

CRAVEN

Equally before the 1982 Falklands war, there was strong pressure within the Reagan administration for the British to accept a compromise peace plan, and in some quarters outright opposition to our retaking the islands from the Argentinians. Admittedly, the United States finally provided valuable strategic support

[REASON

They knew one day they would need

US!

AFGHANISTAN-

IRAQI-LIBYA...]

*

[THE USA IS NO LONGER THE AMERICA OF THOMAS JEFFERSON AND DANIEL WEBSTER WHICH SINCE  1913 HAS BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE ELITE!-IT IS STATED THAT JUST 56 INDIVIDUALS OWN THE COUNTRY. THE DEPRIVATION OF MUCH OF THE PEOPLE IS REMINISENT OF A SECOND CLASS NATION THAN THAT OF THE MOST POWERFUL AND RICHEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. ]

John Garfield  20th President of the USA (1831-81)

'WHOSOEVER CONTROLS THE VOLUME OF MONEY IN ANY COUNTRY IS ABSOLUTE MASTER OF ALL INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE. AND WHEN YOU REALISE THAT THE ENTIRE SYSTEM IS EASILY CONTROLLED  ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, BY A FEW  POWERFUL MEN AT THE TOP, YOU WILL HAVE TO BE TOLD HOW PERIODS OF INFLATION AND DEPRESSION ORIGINATE.

*

 

'The death of President Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom. There was no man in the United States great enough to wear his boots... I fear that FOREIGN BANKERS with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America, and use it systematically  to corrupt modern civilisation.  They will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into WARS and CHAOS in order that the EARTH should become THEIR INHERITANCE.'

EARNEST SAND[?]

 

*

Full article

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

APRIL 25-2016

H .F. 762
Quentin Letts 

-Yesterday in Parliament.

[1295 -1972-A FREE NATION-THEN 

(CAPTIVITY WITHIN THE NAZI PLANNED FOURTH REICH)-

March 16 - 2017 ...]

 

Dear EU,

DAILY MAIL-Quentin Letts-Dear EU, we're off now, love from the people of the UK

LACKLUSTRE exchanges between the Leader of the House and his Shadow were interupted by the Speaker, John Bercow. He had an announcement to savour.

The hour, by the Commons digital clock, was 10.46 and 16 seconds.

'Order, Just before we proceed with the Business Question I have to notify the house, in accordance with the

ROYAL ASSENT ACT 1967

that Her Majesty has signified

HER ROYAL ASSENT

to the following Acts...

The Remain-voting Speaker continued, with apparent boredom:

'Supply and Appropriation (Anticipation and Adjustments) Act 2017;

EUROPEAN UNION

(NOTIFICATION OF WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2017.

 

Full article

 

[COMMENT S IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1149 FREEDOM -FULL STEAM AHEAD!

 were off now, love from the people of the UK.

*  *  *

 

WHERE DID SHE GET THE HAT?

A DAY TO REMEMBER

We saw MRS May in her new head apparel we became aware that the spirit of an IRON LADY was again alive in our Brittanic land.

As in the past, when it was necessay to protect her own, in PEACE and WAR

then Britania would again Rule the Waves to protect HER OWN wherever THEY MAY BE.

AS in the recent past we are again in a BATTLE to recover our PAST.

WE face a time of UNCERTAINTY yet our HISTORY has shown on many occasions that even a TEMPORY SET-BACK leads inevitably to VICTORY.

We have been many times in our LONG HISTORY experienced the THREAT from across the soon to be returned ENGLISH CHANNEL which has as in the days when we had a WOODEN WALL protecting our then FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the days of ALFRED the GREAT through the ELISABETHAN TIME and from a number of attempted INVASIONS since.

But we must REMEMBER that our OWN PARLIAMENT allowed our GREATEST ENEMY GERMANY who after we had suffered TWO WORLD WARS from HER HANDS permitted our FREE NATION STATE in 1972 to sign an ACT of SURRENDER we would call it TREASON which will be finally ERADICATED from our COMMONS JOURNAL within the NEXT FEW DAYS.

At this crucial time in our NATIONS HISTORY we  must remember WHO WE ARE and WHAT WE ARE as a PEOPLE and the message from the past from the TIME of the HEROIC ALFRED the GREAT to the REIGN of our QUEEN BESS- ELISABETH THE FIRST of ENGLAND  who at the sign of an INVADER spoke the words that inspired HER PEOPLE:

 

Elizabeth reviewed her troops at Tilbury.

'My loving people,' she said, we have been persuaded by some that are careful of our safety to take head how we commit ourselves to armed multitudes, for fear of treachery; but I assure you I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful and loving people

LET TYRANTS FEAR!

I have always so behaved myself that , under God, I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects; and therefore am I come amongst you, as you see,

AT THIS TIME

-to lay down my life for my God

AND FOR MY KINGDOM

and for

MY PEOPLE

MY HONOUR

and

MY BLOOD

even in the dust.

I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble women;

BUT I HAVE A HEART OF A KING

and of a

KING of ENGLAND

too, and I think foul scorn that Parma or Spain,

or any

PRINCE of EUROPE

SHOULD DARE TO INVADE THE BORDERS OF MY REALM.'

[S.R. Gardiner-Outline of English History

 to more recent times when a VOICE of DETERMINATION from our greatest WAR LEADER -WINSTON CHURCHILL inspired the NATION with his momentous stirring SPEECH:

You ask, What is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory-victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. May 1940 .

*

FREEDOM

All we have of freedom-all we use and know-This our Fathers bought for us, long and long ago

Kipling. The Old Issue

*

We must be free or die, who speak the tongue

That Shakespeare spoke; the faith and morals hold

Which Milton held.

Wordsworth. Sonnets

*

MARCH 14 - 2017

TREASON

Conservative skulduggery

BACK in 1972 -Tories desert to EU camp

SHORT-TERM SELF-INTEREST EXPLOITED

The UK Accession Bill passed its Third reading on 13th July 1972 by a majority of 17.

Earlier, the debate on the Second reading had lasted for four days (16-19 February), with the Labour Party then officially committed to opposing the legislation. BUT, as happened with the Maastricht Bill two decades later, as Christopher Booker and Richard North observe, 'faced with the possible collapse of their Government, most of the Conservative 'anti-marketeers gritted their teeth' (treacherously, short-sighted and very foolishly -Ed.) 'and walked through the 'aye' lobby. Despite that, 15 Tories voted with the Opposition. TRAITOR

Edward Heath

 got his vote, but only by a water-thin margin:

309 to 301'.

 

 

Tony Benn MP commented after the passage of the Third Reading that

 ‘it was a coup d’etat by a political class who did not believe in popular sovereignty’.

 

Actually, it was worse than that .\It was the start of a coup d’etat by installments’ by a corrupted political class initially led by two operatives-Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon,

 both of whom were recruited German agents  (like Lenin, Rasputin and Lavrentii Beria in the Soviet context, before them) who signed the UK Accession Treaty in exchange for corrupt payments.  Both lied to the British people; and the authors specifically identified one of Geoffrey Rippon’ s worst lies, associated with the alienation of Britain’s fishing waters, the richest in the world.  Here it is worth citing the whole of the authors’ relevant paragraph:

 ‘Desperate to hide how much had been conceded[over fisheries], Geoffrey Rippon…said:

 ‘I must emphasise that these are not just transitional arrangements [in the relevant context, allegedly beneficial to the British fisheries-Ed.]

 which automatically lapse at the end of a fixed period’.  This claim drew fierce challenge from Dennis Healey and Peter Shore[later Lord Shore –further details on EDP bulletin board] both of whom suspected he was lying. 

 What neither had yet seen was the wording of the UK Accession Treaty, which MP’s would not be allowed to examine until after the treaty was signed a month later.  Only when this became available [and Heath and Rippon had accepted their bribes-Ed.]  was it clear that Rippon had told a blatant lie’. [Booker and North, op.cit., page 155]

 International Currency Review

 October 10-2005

 Notes and References:

 ‘Obituary of Sir Edward Heath, the Prime Minister who took Britain into the EEC and presided over constant turmoil at home’,

1. The Daily Telegraph, 18th July 2005.

This was probably the rudest obituary of a prominent UK statesman ever to have appeared in print.  Even so, it omitted any reference to Heath’s recruitment by German (Nazi) intelligence.   However , there are many [coded] references in this obituary, not least the three telling words:

‘He never married’, which observers accurately interpret as meaning that he was homosexual, and therefore an obvious recruitment/blackmail target.

 

2. The Daily Telegraph, 24th July 2005,

 

Christopher Booker (Column),

 

International Currency Review

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 A PATRIOT AND TRUTH-SEEKER

The EDP received in 2005 vital information on the EU from Mr Christopher Story which enabled the EDP to mount a continuing offensive to spread the TRUTH of the EVILS of such a BEAST! which came into existence through LIES! and DECEIT! and as Mr Story has stated in VOLUME 30 NUMBER 4 -the TWIN EVILS of the EU are:-

COLLECTIVISATION AND CORRUPTION.

[What the REMAINERS failed to understand]

These two evils always go together: they did so under overt Communism, when the whole world saw how corrupt the Communist nomenclature was: and they go together under covert communism, notably the version manifested by the

 

 THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE [ 26 ]  .

 

EACH LETTER ABOVE HAS A CHRISTOPHER STORY BULLETIN-TOTAL 26

which the top Soviet intelligence operative Mikhail Gorbachev described on 23rd March 2000, as 'the new European Soviet' It is accordingly a conspicuous waste of time for well-meaning national policymakers, and for the rapidly dwindling class of Euro-ideologues to recommend 'reform' of the EU INSTITUTIONS. They are incapable of reform, because, as we reveal exclusively in this issue, they are born of CORRUPTION- and because the TREATIES that 'sustain' them were procured by means of CORRUPT 'BLack' payments.'

*

More!

 
 

H.F.1150 FREEDOM NOW

H.F.1144 FREEDOM NOW

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017--       - (1994 -Official Website-AUGUST-2017 ) -   JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017-PT1 -

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-2017

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

SHORT CUT TO EXIT EU NEWS

eu latest news on brexit

latest news eu

eu latest immigration news

eu news now

eu news today

europe news headlines

eu germany latest

eu news germany

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 
 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

      9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA
LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND
SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND
100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

 THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT:

April 20, 2017

Why the saboteurs should simmer down

Like the mating dance of the warthog, a must-see ritual of the natural world is the British Left throwing a fit of the vapours over a headline in the Mail. The latest to provoke hysteria was our front-page summary of why Theresa May called for a snap election: 'Crush the saboteurs.'

'Nasty and divisive!' tweeted Labour's IRA, Hamas and Hezbollah-sympathising John McDonnell (look who's talking!). 'This kind of hate and aggression is the last thing the country needs,' whimpered the ever-smug tax avoider Gary Lineker.

'Fascist!' said a Guardianista. 'Stalinist!' opined another, with some halfwit tweeting: 'Stalin killed millions by labelling people saboteurs and enemies of the people. Literally the same words as the Mail. Chilling.' Not for the first time, this paper advises: calm down, dears.

For the avoidance of doubt, neither the PM nor this peace-loving paper proposes genocide. All that Mrs May plans, with our support, is an election to establish her mandate for pressing on with

BREXIT

(backed by 52 per cent)

without further frustration from 'game-playing' Remoaners and an unelected second chamber.

As for the word 'saboteurs', how else to describe a Labour Party which has threatened to vote against a final agreement with the EU? Or Lib Dems who say they want to grind government to a standstill? Or Scots Nats who say they'll vote against legislation repealing our EU membership?

If they don't like being called saboteurs, shouldn't they give up the sabotage?

And how striking that many who criticised the Mail were the very same people who likened Mrs May's call for an election to the move by Turkey's human rights-violating dictator, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to increase his powers. What a contemptibly stupid and offensive comparison.

We have long known the Left demonises anyone with whom it disagrees. But this is getting ridiculous.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4427192/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-saboteurs-simmer-down.html#ixzz4eo141qsw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  
[A PROCLAMATION

FOR

 ENGLAND'S

 FREEDOM AND FUTURE.

 

COUNTDOWN TO SUCCESS

ON

JUNE 8-2017

WE REMIND REMOANERS-PARTICULARLY MPs THAT BREXIT IS ABOUT FREEDOM-CULTURE AND COUNTRY-AND PROSPERITY WITHIN A WIDER WORLD OF OPPORTUNITY

NOT ABOUT IF YOU COULD LOSE YOUR JOB OR BUSINESS OR EU HANDOUTS-

PAID FOR BY ENGLISH TAXPAYERS MAINLY IN THE SOUTH EAST OF ENGLAND.]

*

     

    Tory manifesto will guarantee end

     

     

     

    of

     

     

     

     

    free movement

     

     

     

     

    ++

     

     

     

     

     

     UK to leave Single Market

     

     

     

     

     ++

     

     

     

     

     

     No more

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    meddling by Euro Judges

     

     

     

     

     

     

    by

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Jason Groves-Political Editor | Daily

     

     

    Mail Online

     

     

    THERESA'S CAST-IRON

    BREXIT

    PLEDGES

     

     

     

     

     

    THERESA MAY will place a triple lock on Brexit  in the Tory manifesto to STOP OBSTRUCTION

     

     

    by

     

     

    DIEHARD REMAINERS

     

    Tory sources say she is set to include specific pledges to overcome opposition within her party and in the Lords.

    The manifesto is expected to commit the Conservatives to ending

     

    EU FREE MOVEMENT

     

    and pulling out of both the

    SINGLE MARKET

    and

    EUROPEAN COURT of JUSTICE

    Senior Tories see these three measures as essential in delivering last year's referendum result

    [Mrs May's Pledge that

    BREXIT means BREXIT

     is MET!]

     

    Full article

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    April 20-2017

     

     

     

    Brexit boost as US Speaker backs

     

     

     

     

    free trade deal with

     

     

     

    UK

     

     

     

     

    ... - Daily Mail

     

     

     

    by Jack Doyle Executive Political Editorl

     

     

     

    THERESA MAY received a major boost last night after a

     

    leading US politician backed a swift free

     

    trade deal with the UK

     

    Paul Ryan, the Speaker of the House of

     

    Representatives and a senior member of

     

    Donald Trump's Republican party, said

     

     

    Washington wanted to strike a free trade

     

     

     

    deal with BRITAIN as soon as possible.

     

     

     

    In a speech to the Policy Exchange think-tank

     

    in Central London, Mr Ryan said such

     

     

    a deal would 'further tap into the great

     

    potential between our

     

    TWO PEOPLE...

     

     

    Full article

     

     

    April 20-2017

     

     

     

    QUENTIN LETTS: Mrs May enjoying

     

     

     

    power for first time | Daily Mail ...

     

    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/.../QUENTIN-LETTS-Mrs May-enjoying-power-

    time.html

    18 hours ago ... It's not just the new hairstyle. Mrs May is glowing. For the

    first time, she's is really enjoying power, writes QUENTIN LETTS.

    By Quentin Letts for ...
     

     

    Full article

     

    April 20-2017
*

H.F. 1175 FREEDOM AND A FUTURE LINKED TO THE PAST!
 

Conservative Friends of Israel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Jump to: navigation, search
Conservative Friends of Israel, abbreviated to CFI, is a British parliamentary group affiliated to the Conservative Party, which is dedicated to strengthening business, cultural and political ties between the United Kingdom and Israel. CFI is an unincorporated association. It also seeks to strengthen ties between the British Conservative Party and the Israeli Likud party.

It was founded in 1974 by Conservative MP for Bury and Radcliffe, Michael Fidler. It is currently chaired by Stuart Polak. The Parliamentary Chairman is James Arbuthnot, the Parliamentary President is Baroness Shephard of Northwold. The Vice Chairmen are John Butterfill and James Clappison, the Secretary is David Amess, the Officers are Alistair Burt, Lee Scott, and Theresa Villiers, and the Chairman of CFI Europe is Timothy Kirkhope.

In 1995 Conservative politician Robert Rhodes James called it "the largest organisation in Western Europe dedicated to the cause of the people of Israel".[1]

By 2009, according to the Channel 4 documentary Dispatches – Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, around 80% of Conservative MPs were members of the CFI.[2] In 2013, Peter Oborne, the Daily Telegraph's chief political commentator called CFI “by far Britain’s most powerful pro-Israel lobbying group”. The same is true of AIPAC in the US.”[3]

 

 

Activities[edit]

The group's 2005 strategy identified the following areas of activity: supporting Israel, promoting the British Conservative Party, fighting terrorism, combating anti-semitism, and promoting peace in the Middle East.[4] According to their website, "over two thirds" of Conservative MPs were members of Conservative Friends of Israel in 2006.[5] In 2007 the Political Director stated it had over 2000 members and registered supporters.[6] In 2009, at least half of the shadow cabinet were members of the group according to a Dispatches documentary.[7]

Their website states the opinion that it is one of the fastest growing political lobby groups in the UK.[8] According to the Dispatches documentary, between 2006 and 2009 the CFI funded more than 30 Conservative parliamentary candidates to visit Israel.[7]

In 2012 CFI reconstituted itself as a private company limited by guarantee.[9]

CFI annual business lunch[edit]

David Cameron, then newly elected leader of the Conservative Party, addressed the CFI annual business lunch on 30 January 2006, whose audience included half of the Conservative Parliamentary Party. As part of his speech, he stated "I am proud not just to be a Conservative, but a Conservative friend of Israel; and I am proud of the key role CFI plays within our Party. Israel is a democracy, a strong and proud democracy, in a region that is, we hope, making its first steps in that direction."[10]

Former Conservative party leaders Iain Duncan Smith[11] and Michael Howard[12] have addressed the CFI lunch.

The British Pakistani MP Sajid Javid has also made business lunch speeches which have been positively received by the CFI, the Jewish Chronicle even reporting Javid as a future Prime Minister.[13]

Donations[edit]

The Dispatches documentary claimed members of the group and their companies have donated over £10 million to the Conservative party between 2001 and 2009. The group called this figure "deeply flawed" saying that they have only donated £30,000 between 2004 and 2009 but that members of the group have undoubtedly made their own donations to the party. Dispatches described the CFI as "beyond doubt the most well-connected and probably the best funded of all Westminster lobbying groups".[2][7]

Members of CFI[edit]

According to the CFI website 80% of Tory MPs are members of Conservative Friends of Israel.[14]

In alphabetical order, members of Conservative Friends of Israel include:

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Peter Oborne (12 December 2012). "The cowardice at the heart of our relationship with Israel". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
  2. ^ a b Dispatches: Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, Channel 4, Monday 16 November 2009
  3. ^ Peter Oborne, Iran nuclear deal: ill-informed friends of Israel are refusing to face facts, Daily Telegraph, 27 November 2013, accessed 10 August 2015
  4. ^ CFI INFORMED Magazine, Second Edition (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, February 2007, p. 3, retrieved 29 May 2008 [dead link]
  5. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel – About Us
  6. ^ Robert Halfon (27 September 2007). "Introducing the CFI". ConservativeHome. Retrieved 20 August 2012. 
  7. ^ a b c Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 16 November 2009. 
  8. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel web site
  9. ^ "Companies House WebCHeck - CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL LIMITED". Companies House. Company No. 08114952. Archived from the original on 29 December 2008. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
  10. ^ CFI INFORMED Weekly Briefing (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, 3 February 2006, retrieved 25 May 2006 [dead link]
  11. ^ Duncan Smith: Israel has the right to defend itself against terrorists, Conservatives.com, 10 December 2001
  12. ^ "Howard Speech to the Conservative Friends of Israel, at the Savoy Hotel, London". Conservatives.com. 6 December 2004. Archived from the original on 12 December 2004. 
  13. ^ http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/94117/muslim-tory-mp-after-britain-israel-best
  14. ^ a b "About CFI". Conservative Friends of Israel. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
  15. ^ "Ministers "will change" war crimes arrest law". Jewish Chronicle. 8 July 2010. 
  16. ^ "Altrincham and Sale West: Election 2010". Jewish Chronicle. 29 April 2010. 
  17. ^ "UK: Evangelical Christian appointed new UK Middle East Minister". The Muslim News. 15 May 2010. Archived from the original on 22 March 2012. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
  18. ^ "British MPs furious after Israel President Shimon Peres accuses the English of being anti-semitic". Daily Mail. UK. 1 August 2010. 
  19. ^ a b "Cameron's Cabinet: Who are they?". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
  20. ^ "Mike's Biography". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
  21. ^ "William Hague's Schmooze With The Jewish News". Totally Jewish. 25 March 2010. 
  22. ^ a b "Ministers lose seats in the East". East Anglia Daily Times. 7 May 2010. 
  23. ^ Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. 
  24. ^ "About Conservative Friends of Israel". cfoi.co.uk. Retrieved 22 September 2011. 
  25. ^ "Eric Pickles to lead MPs’ delegation to Israel". Jewish Chronicle. July 24, 2015. 
  26. ^ "Rifkind elected as Kensington MP". Jewish Chronicle. 7 May 2010. 
  27. ^ Sloan, Alaistair. "Ed Miliband will back Israel". Middle East Monitor. Retrieved 13 April 2015. 

External links[edit]

 

*

 

Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims | Politics | The ...

www.theguardian.com/.../pro-israel-lobby-conservatives-channel4-dispatches
‎
16 Nov 2009 ... 50% of MPs in the shadow cabinet are Conservative Friends of Israel members,
according to Channel 4's Dispatches.
 

Conservative Friends of Israel director Stuart Polak receives peerage

www.thejc.com/.../conservative-friends-israel-director-stuart-polak-receives-peerage
‎
9 Dec 2015 ... Stuart Polak, the veteran Conservative Friends of Israel director, was handed a
seat in the House of Lords when David Cameron finally ...
 

 

H.F.1235

 
 

LINKS to Works of Vernon Coleman-A PATRIOT A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/A1042/CON30/B404/B308/

A1730/A1728/A1739/A24

A MATTER OF FACT!

NO 3

 

ABOUT THE USA

 

[2003]

 

ROGUE [POLITICAL-CORPORATE-MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN ] AMERICA

 

www.vernoncoleman.com

 

[A HISTORY OF THE OIL INDUSTRY IN IRAQ / IRAN AND ITS BRUTAL CONSEQUENCES FOR ITS PEOPLES.]

 

America only entered World War I (on the side of Britain and France) after both its new allies and new enemies were pretty much exhausted by the fighting.  Once it agreed to join in the war America imposed conditions which included the demand that America's economic and political objectives be taken into account when the war was over.  One of the objectives was access to new sources of raw material, particularly oil.   In February 1919, Sir Arthur Hirtzel, a leading British official warned:

 'It should be borne in mind that the Standard Oil Company is very anxious to take over IRAQ.'

 America demanded that it's oil companies be allowed to negotiate freely with the new puppet monarchy of King Faisal (the monarch whom the British had put on the throne in IRAQ).  And so  Iraq's oil was divided up between the allies.  Five per cent of the oil went to an oil magnet called Gulbebenkian ( later known as Mr Five Per Cent' who had helped negotiate the agreement).  The other 95per cent was split four ways between

BRITAIN, FRANCE, HOLLAND and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Companies now known as British Petroleum, SHELL, MOBIL and EXXON pretty much had a MONOPOLY of the oil available.  (Iraqi oil was split this way until 1958 when there was a REVOLUTION in IRAQ)

American influence in the region was sealed when the al-Saud family and the United Stats of America created Saudi Arabia in the 1930's pretty much as an American colony. It was no coincidence that the American Embassy in Riyadh, the capital city, was situated in the local oil company building.

The Americans were not , however, satisfied with their share of Middle East oil.  The wanted CONTROL. They had to get rid of the British. And their chance came with the Second World War.

The Americans unceasingly portray themselves as Britain's saviour. This is a wicked misrepresentation. As it had been in the great War.  America was ruthlessly opportunistic.

Britain was greatly weakened by the Second World War but America grew tremendously in power as a result of what happened in the early 1940's.  The Roosevelt and Truman administrations (which were dominated by the banking and oil interests [As is the situation in JUNE 2010] decided to restructure the world to ensure that the USA would  be on top. 

THEY WANTED  CONTROL OF THE WORLD'S OIL.

They wanted USA dominated

GLOBALISATION

( to which end they created the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank in 1944)

They wanted the dollar to be the ONLY significant world currency.  And they wanted the USA to have military superiority in all types of weapons.

Winston Churchill was so worried by what he could see happening that on March 4th 1944 (three months before D - DAY invasion of Normandy) he sought assurance from the USA that she would not take over

BRITISH OIL INTERESTS.

He wrote to the USA President Roosevelt saying:

' Thank you very much for your assurances about no sheep's eyes on our oilfields in Iran and Iraq.  Let me reciprocate by giving you the fullest assurance that we have no thought of trying to horn in upon your interests or property in Saudi Arabia. My position in this, as in all matters, is that Great Britain seeks no advantage, territorial or otherwise, as a result of this war. On the other hand, she will not be deprived of anything which rightly belongs to her after having given her best services to the good cause, at least not so long as your humble servant is entrusted with the conduct of affairs.'

Sadly, there was nothing that even Churchill could do to save Britain from its new 'enemy'.  In 1953, a CIA coup which put the Shah in power gave Iran to the United States of America. ( The Americans also helped the Shah form his much hated secret police.)

And within a couple of years after that Iraq was jointly controlled by America and Britain.

In 1955 America set up the Baghdad Pact, which was designed, at least in part, to oppose the rise of Arab liberation movements in the Middle East.  Britain and Iraq were signatories, although Iraq was independent only in name.  The British still had military airfields in Iraq which was ruled by a corrupt monarchy.  The people of Iraq, despite having a huge quantity of the world's oil under their feet, were staving and living in abject poverty.

Things changed in Iraq in 1958, A military rebellion launched a REVOLUTION

which was to have dramatic consequences on the world.  The day after the revolution started the Americans put 20,000 marines into Lebanon and over 6000 paratroopers dropped into Jordan.  Under Eisenhower's leadership the USA and the UK had made it clear that they would go to war to protect their interests in Lebanon and Jordan.

The British, rather naively, thought that they were simply protecting their interests outside Iraq.  the Americans had bigger thoughts. they wanted to go into Iraq, overturn the revolution and put a new puppet government (friendly to the USA, of course) in charge in Baghdad.

BUT THE AMERICANS WERE STOPPED.

The Iraq revolution was too big. And it had much support from other Arab countries, from the people's republic of China and from the USSR. the Americans glumly gave up their imperialist plans.

But they didn't give up completely.

The thwarted Americans added Iraq to their growing list of terrorist nations and gave great support to right wing Kurdish elements who were fighting the Iraq government.  then, in the late 1970's the Americans suported the government of Saddam Hussein in its fight against communism.   In the 1980's the Americans supported (with money and arms) Saddam Hussein's Iraq in its eight years war with Iran , a country over which America had lost control during Iran's islamic Revolution of 1970.  The Americans openly admitted that they were intervening in order to safeguard their access to the region's oil and they slightly less openly hoped that Iraq and Iran would weaken each other and enable the USA to take over. 

'I hope they kill each other,'

former secretary of state Henry Kissinger [ a Bilderberger and a member of the ruling elite of the USA the Council on Foreign Relations who decide the Foreign Policy of the country]

is said to have remarked.

The Americans provided Iraq's air force with satellite photographs of Iranian targets and sent anti-aircraft missiles to Iran so that the Iranians could shoot down the aircraft which the Iraqis sent over.  America fought on both sides of the war and was well aware that Saddam Hussein was using chemical weapons.

Over a million people died and both countries were left weaker. ( Bizarrely, and hypocritically, in 2003 George W Bush was claiming that Saddam Hussein's use of chemical weapons in this war was one of the main reasons for attacking Iraq.)  The money America made from selling missiles to Iran was used to finance the CONTRAS who were fighting the Socialist government in Nicaragua.  Reagan, USA President at the time, disapproved of socialist regimes and wanted to get rid of this one in particular. (It is perhaps unfair to ascribe such depth of feeling to Reagan himself, rather than to his advisors.)

The war between Iraq and Iran didn't finish until 1988, by which time Iraq had become friendly with the USSR.

But then the USSR was taken over by Gorbachev, who wanted to end the COLD WAR and a permanent detente with America. Gorbachev withdrew Soviet support from Iraq (as he had withdrawn it from countries in eastern Europe) and the world suddenly changed yet again.

After the war with Iran Saddam Hussein had accumulated massive debts.  The low price of oil meant that his income didn't match his national outgoings.  the Iraqi president accused Kuwait of drilling for oil in Iraqi territory and then announced that Kuwait wasn't a separate nation at all but a province of Iraq.  Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait in 1990.  America (with an INTERNATIONAL FORCE) attacked, the resultant war was over in weeks and in 1991 the Americans got back into Iraq.  In the decade that followed they have used sanctions, bombings and blockades to weaken the Iraqi people and destroy their spirit.  American sanctions against Iraq do not target Saddam Hussein,

THEY TARGET THE IRAQI PEOPLE.

Now the Americans, led by oil man George W Bush are going back to Iraq [2003]. Americans do not give a fig for HUMAN RIGHTS and they know that Saddam Hussein is NO THREAT TO AMERICA.   They know well that he has NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.  (And even if he did have them the Americans have the military capability to DESTROY IRAQ IN SECONDS)  They surely also know that Saddam Hussein has NOTHING in COMMON with OSAMA bin LADEN.

 

AMERICA IS GOING BACK INTO IRAQ FOR THE SAME ,GOOD OLD REASON

 

OIL!

[This article was written in 2003 by Vernon Coleman]

www.vernoncoleman.com

*

 

www.JEWSNOTZIONISTS.ORG

*

www.prisonplanet.com/kucinichwe-may-be-funding-our-own-killers-in-afghanistan-JUNE-2010

*

http://www.prisonplanet.com/camp-fema-exclusively-online-for-prison-planet-tv-members.html

MORE FROM VERNON COLEMAN

 

NO 371

Find a war and you'll find that both sides are fighting with weapons supplied (at a price to anyone) by the Americans and British arms industries .  When Americans or British troops are killed they are usually killed with British or American bullets fired from British and American guns.

Is more violence really the only answer? Where will all the violence end?  What does state approved revenge become state sponsored terrorism?  Is America justified in killing innocent people.

Instead of seeking revenge America should lead by example. Instead of retaliating in hatred they should ask for peace. Why does that thought seem so naive?

 

NO 373

American activities in Iraq and elsewhere have reinforced the conflict between Europe and the Muslim world and have helped establish strong fundamentalist Islamic politicians in power.

The American activities in the Middle East are invariably self-serving: the aim is to satisfy the arms industry, the oil industry and Zionists.  the cost is stability and peace.  Americans don't worry about the cost of war because war is usually profitable for the massive arms industry,

NO 322

 In 2003 the Americans claimed that by opposing their enthusiasm for dropping bombs on Iraq the French and Germans were endangering NATO.

Once again the Americans needed to study their history books (though preferably not ones written or published in America). NATO was created to deal with the alleged threat posed by the Soviet Union (a threat which existed largely in the minds of the Americans.

By 2003 there was clearly no longer a threat from the Soviet Union and so there was no need for NATO to continue to exist.

The truth is that NATO only existed in 2003 because the well-paid officials who worked for it were determined to keep it alive.

 

[A REMINDER TO DAVID CAMERON in 2011]

 

Bush and Blair claim that replacing Saddam Hussein is a moral act-designed solely to help the people of Iraq. (Although curiously, Tony Blair, who likes to describe himself as a religious man, and who is allegedly planning to become a Catholic, publicly ignored the Pope's plea for mo war against Iraq.)

If these two are now concerned with replacing 'undemocratic' leaders when will wars ever end?

And why aren't the USA and the UK declaring war on themselves? both have leaders who represent minorities.

Blair repeatedly ignored the large majority of the British electorate who were opposed to the war against Iraq. Can a leader who takes no notice of the people be described as democratic?

MARCH-2011

 

www.vernoncoleman.com

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 19-2014

H .F. 513

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

2017-10-30

Is Donald Trump too scared to name George Bush Sr. and P2 Freemasons as Kennedy assassins?

By  White Dragon Society  35 Comments
U.S. Corporation President Donald Trump last week announced he would release all records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, “other than the names and addresses of any mentioned person who is still living.”  In other words, it appears he is too scared to mention the involvement of George Bush (Scherf, Pecce) Sr. and the Vatican P2 Freemason lodge fascist New World Order faction.

Pentagon officials, however, say, “Trump muscled the CIA, Mossad, the FBI, and the Bush cabal to release ALL JFK files, since [then Israeli Prime Minister] Ben Gurion wanted JFK dead, and the same perps also did 9/11.”

These are the people who aim to create a world fascist government controlled by members of European royal families who claim descent from the Caesars and from King David, as revealed by forensic research over a period of many years.  This research, including meetings with many members of this family group, has led us to the conclusion that these are the real “elders of Zion.”

Thanks to the confessions of Benjamin Freedman…
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

and others, John F. Kennedy became aware of a plot to start World War III, wipe out 90% of humanity, and turn the rest into slaves.  The Zionists very nearly succeeded in accomplishing this by triggering all-out nuclear war during the Cuban missile crisis.  That is why Kennedy decided to take away their main source of power—the ability to create money out of thin air.

George Bush Sr. (whose real family name goes back through Sherf and Pearce to the Roman aristocratic Pecce name) and the Zionists had Kennedy assassinated in order to prevent the nationalization of the Federal Reserve Board.

These people are still in control of the creation of U.S. dollars, Euros, and Japanese yen out of thin air.  Their main instrument of power in the U.S. these days is still the Bush/Clinton/Rockefeller Zionist Federal Reserve Board, truth researchers agree.

A very interesting example of how these gangsters distribute their fiat money can be seen in the article at the link below that shows how the rise in Amazon share prices matches the rise in central bank money printing and moves in the opposite direction of actual Amazon results.  There can be little doubt that Jeff Bezos is now “the world’s richest man,” because he has been selected as a premier distributor of fiat money.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-27/amazon

Forensic research has shown that most (if not all) major listed corporations are controlled, via hedge funds like Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, Fidelity, etc., by this family group, known now to many as the Khazarian mafia.

In Japan, this writer has identified the quislings used by the Khazarian mafia, thanks to testimony by assassins formerly in their employ here.  These people are now vanishing one by one as their former hitmen turn on them, the assassins say.

The quisling politician Seiji Maehara played a key role in the recent theft of the Japanese election by Khazarian mobsters led by Rothschild agent Michael Greenberg and Barbara Bush cousin Richard Armitage.  Maehara is the son of the North Korean agent Son Tae Chuk, also known as Daisaku Ikeda.  Ikeda for years was the absolute ruler of the Soka Gakkai Buddhist lay group and controller of the Komeito political party, whose duped members are crucial to maintaining Khazarian control of Japan.  Ikeda has been in a vegetative state (probably dead) for several years, so Maehara is effectively in charge now, even though he ostensibly belongs to a different political grouping.  White Dragon Society (WDS) sources in Japan say Maehara regularly walks into the U.S. embassy in Tokyo and is never asked to show any ID.

The Khazarians stole the Japanese election because the Party of Hope led by Koike Yuriko was planning to nationalize the Bank of Japan, say sources close to the Japanese emperor.

With U.S. President Donald Trump scheduled to visit Japan November 5-7, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS, the employer of Greenberg and Armitage) had big meetings this past weekend in Tokyo to discuss what agenda they were going to present to Trump.

Prior to this gathering, the CSIS sent a top agent to meet with a representative of the White Dragon Society.  At this meeting, the CSIS official, who personally does not approve of Armitage, said that he was sent by Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte to…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

2017-10-27

Emergency Alert

By  White Dragon Society  16 Comments
Murderer and drug dealer Richard Armitage and criminal Michael Green (berg) will be at the Teikoku Hotel in Tokyo, Japan between 8:30 and 13:15 on Friday, October 27th, 2017.
http://www.nikkei-events.jp/csis/

Richard Armitage has been responsible for the murder and torture of Japanese prime ministers, according to my sources.  He has also been named by CIA and other sources as a drug dealer and a traitor who contributed greatly to the U.S. loss in the Vietnam War.  He will be wearing a bulletproof vest at the event because he has created many enemies with his crimes.

Michael Green told Japanese gangsters that I was a woman-beating amphetamine addict and paid them to kill me, according to these gangsters.  He employs Japanese gangsters to terrorize the Japanese political and financial establishment.

These men engineered the theft of the Japanese election that took place on October 22, 2017, and now their puppets like Shinzo Abe are calling for war with North Korea according to the agenda of their Zionist masters.

Message to Admiral Harry Harris:  If you do not order military police to arrest these traitors and criminals, you yourself will ultimately face court martial and imprisonment for neglect of duty.

These men must be arrested, and if they resist arrest, all necessary force must be used.  Arresting these men could be the game-changer that finally liberates humanity from Khazarian mob terror.

We will offer a bounty of 1 ton of gold deliverable in Hong Kong for the arrest of these criminals.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

緊急報告：
リチャード・アーミタジとミカエル・グリーンは２０１７年１０月２７日の８時３０分から１３時１５分の間に帝国ホテルで登場する予定です。
多くの情報源によるとアーミタジは殺人犯や麻薬犯である。またアーミタジは多くの日本の総理大臣の殺戮に加担したと情報源らが言う。彼の逮捕は急務である。
ミカエル・グリーンは日本の多くの暴力団と関係を持っている。彼が日本のとても危険な連中に僕は女に暴力を振るう覚せい剤中毒者だと言う嘘を付いて僕の殺人を依頼した。彼の逮捕も急務である。
彼らが１０月２２日の総選挙泥簿をして、今家来安部政権に北朝鮮との戦争を始めさせようとしている。この二人を束縛すれば日本は再び独立国家になれる。
皆さん２７日に帝国ホテルで集合してください。勝負をつけましょう。

 
2017-10-26

Another Letter to the Editor About the Jews

By  White Dragon Society  17 Comments
Hello, Benjamin,

It is funny reading how the JEWS do not like being criticized for being JEWS.

No, it’s not the Khazarians, it’s the F-ing JEWS that are destroying the world.

I don’t buy into the “good Jews” and “bad Jews” argument.  Those that do not wish to go along with the JEWISH SH＃T SCUM in the world should act accordingly and stop calling themselves JEWISH.

Of course you will not have the guts to print this because you are part of the system.

JEWS are a cancer upon this world.  Any group that has been shunned from every country on Earth for over 2,000 years should by now realise that they are doing something wrong.

We need to call it like it is:  IT IS THE JEWS THAT ARE HELL-BENT ON DESTROYING THE WORLD.  HELL-BENT IS A VERY GOOD PHRASE TO USE BECAUSE IT IS SATAN WHO IS THEIR GOD AND IS WHO THEY SERVE.　That is the truth.  The JEWS do not want the truth to be known.

What are you going to do, Benjamin?  Are you going to tell the truth, or are you going to continue to hide behind this Khazarian lie?

Even if you do not print this, I would like you to reply.  What I have said is the truth!  Are you going to run and hide, or are you going to tell the truth?

Regards

 

Hello,

First of all, I do not consider myself to be Jewish.  I am a human being from the planet earth—that is all.  I simply point out that according to their definition, I am one of them.

I think the Jews are like the matador’s red cape used in bullfights.  They distract us from the real enemy who is, as you point out, the Satanists.  A lot of Satanists pretend to be Jews, but most Jews are not Satanists.

I have and continue to risk my life to fight against the Satanists, but at the same time, so as not to become like them, I refuse to attack innocent people, whatever ethnic group they identify with.

However, the Jews do need to join the fight against the Satanists.  They also need to renounce many of the horrific things written in the Talmud such as this:  “Even the best of the ‘goyim’ should all be killed.”  (Soferim 15)

Benjamin Fulford

 
2017-10-23

Past Presidents of Bankrupt U.S. Corporation Go on “Beg-athon” for Godfather Bush

By  White Dragon Society  244 Comments
The dragnet is slowly but inexorably closing in on the Bush/Clinton (Scherf/ Rockefeller) Khazarian mafia clan and their Federal Reserve Board printing press.  Multiple legal investigations, mass arrests of junior Khazarian mobsters, and public disclosure are now part of regular public discourse, and not just on blogs formerly maligned as “conspiracy” sites.

An interesting sign of the Khazarians’ desperation was the spectacle of George Bush Senior posing with four other former presidents (minus Donald Trump) of the United States Corporation as part of a “beg-athon.”
http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/356605-photo-of-lady-gaga-and-five-former-presidents-goes-viral

First, we must note that with computer graphics and body doubles it is hard to know if this event really took place.  For example, multiple sources have told this writer that Bill Clinton (Rockefeller) died of AIDS early this year.

Nonetheless, assuming this event did really take place, this is what a senior CIA source in Texas had to say about it:

“The ‘beg-athon’ in Texas is pure BS.  Notice that the money goes through the George H.W. Bush (Scherf) Foundation.  They are scamming money any way they can get it.  The Khazarian mafia cabal must be really desperate.”

The causes of their desperation have been snowballing in recent weeks.  Perhaps most deadly have been the ongoing disclosures about Khazarian genocides.  This has started with the release of documents showing that the U.S. government was involved in the murder of over 500,000 Indonesians in the mid-1960s.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/10/18/documents-reveal-active-us-support-indonesian-mass-killings-1960s

The Texas-based CIA source admits, “We removed [Indonesian President] Soekarno from power, and we put Soeharto into power.”  He regrets that he was a part of the operation back them.  His excuse:  just doing what he was ordered to do by his boss at Langley.

President Donald Trump promised more disclosure in the following tweet, saying, “Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President, the long blocked and classified JFK files to be opened.”

Three separate sources—one NSA, one Pentagon, and one CIA—all said they did not believe Trump would release the real truth about the Kennedy assassination.

However, one senior Pentagon source who has been consistently reliable in the past said that “The Trump release of JFK files may implicate Bush Senior, Mossad, the CIA, and the deep state, and may be a prelude to an intel dump on 9/11, suppressed technology, the secret space program, and other disclosures prior to mass arrests.”

Long-term readers of this blog already know that JFK was assassinated because he was trying, using gold provided by Soekarno, to take control of the issuance of U.S. dollars away from the privately-owned Federal Reserve Board (FRB).

Pentagon sources are saying that in any case, “Khazarian control of the FRB is kaput, as Fed Governor Jerome (Jay) Powell may be chosen as the next FRB, beating the three Jews Gary Cohn, Janet Yellen, and Kevin Warsh, who is son-in-law of billionaire 9/11 conspirator and Israeli asset Ron Lauder….  Stanford PhD economist John Taylor may also be named to the FRB as Vice Chairman or Governor.”

The source continues by noting, “When the global currency reset happens, the FRB may be folded into [the U.S.] Treasury [Department] and issue gold-backed United States Notes (USN).

The Texas CIA source, who claims to hate Bush Senior but appears to be closely connected to him, says the Khazarian mafia was ready to retaliate by taking drastic action, warning that “The entire Internet has a back door installed and the Khazarian mafia can and will
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2017-10-20

Letter to the Editor – A Note on “Jewishness” and Zionism

By  White Dragon Society  12 Comments
Hello Ben,

I read the complaint of the individual objecting to your use of the term “Jewish” in your description of events last week.  There is, I think, reason to differentiate carefully between the term “Jewish mafia” and the Italian Mafia.  They are not necessarily correct analogs.

In the case of Jewish people, one awful risk they face, which apparently is largely unseen by many of them, is the Zionists.  The Zionists are the Jewish mafia, and it is apparent to me that they are hiding behind the Jewish religion as a front for their activities.

This places Jewish people in a terrible position of “shield.”  And in order for an entire people to serve as that shield, they often express strong belief in support of the Zionists, apparently not understanding that in no way does Zionism serve the Jewish religion.  I don’t think Italians have anywhere near this level of identification with their captors.

Just a thought.  As a friend to all people, I find this situation very aggravating, as any negative criticism of Zionism very often incites attacks decrying “anti-Semitism.”  (As you pointed out, a misnomer.)  Actually, most people identifying with Judaism today have nothing to do with Semites.  They’re effectively Khazarians filtered through European bloodlines.

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford
Menu
 
 

2017-10-20

Letter to the Editor – A Note on “Jewishness” and Zionism

By  White Dragon Society  6 Comments
Hello Ben,

I read the complaint of the individual objecting to your use of the term “Jewish” in your description of events last week.  There is, I think, reason to differentiate carefully between the term “Jewish mafia” and the Italian Mafia.  They are not necessarily correct analogs.

In the case of Jewish people, one awful risk they face, which apparently is largely unseen by many of them, is the Zionists.  The Zionists are the Jewish mafia, and it is apparent to me that they are hiding behind the Jewish religion as a front for their activities.

This places Jewish people in a terrible position of “shield.”  And in order for an entire people to serve as that shield, they often express strong belief in support of the Zionists, apparently not understanding that in no way does Zionism serve the Jewish religion.  I don’t think Italians have anywhere near this level of identification with their captors.

Just a thought.  As a friend to all people, I find this situation very aggravating, as any negative criticism of Zionism very often incites attacks decrying “anti-Semitism.”  (As you pointed out, a misnomer.)  Actually, most people identifying with Judaism today have nothing to do with Semites.  They’re effectively Khazarians filtered through European bloodlines.

 

2017-10-19

Possible Upcoming False Flags, Crisis Actor Recruitment

By  White Dragon Society  8 Comments
Information contributed by readers:

The pizzagate investigators at Voat found something really suspicious on Twitter:
Recruitment for crisis actors for a disaster event scheduled for 10/31-11/2 in Oklahoma City.
 http://work4hds.com/apply/

Also, a suspicious Craigslist ad related to the planned action by Antifa on 11/4.  Orangeburg area:
 https://columbia.craigslist.org/gov/d/need-people-for-role-players/6351154067.html

 
2017-10-19

Letters to the Editor

By  White Dragon Society  7 Comments
Hello Benjamin:

I am a subscriber and appreciate your contribution to current events.  However, I am disturbed that today for the second time in a short period you have seen fit to include quotes from sources that use the term “Jewish” in a way that seems inaccurate and incendiary.  I know there is indeed a Jewish mafia.  But there is also an Italian mafia, and their behavior doesn’t get tied to their religion.

I appreciate your use of the term Khazarian, for example.

Yes, I am Jewish… a truth seeker… and very unhappy with Zionism, the situation in Israel, the treatment of Palestinians, and rationalization of such treatment.  I agree the cabal and all of its engines need to be eliminated.

I am very happy to see the pedophile and sexual predator nightmare getting unveiled.

But just because so-called Jewish names are so easily identifiable, it is important to resist the superficial conclusion that having a Jewish name is part of the true problem.  Let’s resolve to find the true roots of all of this sickness and change our world to leave that sickness behind.

I appreciate your use of the term “pseudo-Jewish” as well.

Thanks for your consideration.

 

Hello:

First of all, please understand that my mother’s mother was Jewish and my father’s mother is Jewish, so technically that makes me Jewish, too, although I do not like the word Jew, which was created in the 17th century.  My family was never ruled by the Torah or Talmud, but were atheists and thus forced to live within the ghettos in order to survive.

In any case, the reason “Jewish” appeared in that context in my report was because it was in a quote, and I felt it important to convey to readers the thinking of this source.

I have repeatedly explained to would-be anti-Semites (“Semite” is also a problematic term since it includes Arabs) that just because most members of the Mafia are Italian, it does not mean most Italians are Mafiosi.  In the same way, while Jewish gangsters are all Jewish, most Jews are not gangsters.

Trust me, there is no way we will allow for innocent people to be hurt because of the actions of a few high-level criminals.

Sincerely yours,
Benjamin Fulford

 

Hi Ben,

Do you still insist there is a coalition between Russia and the USA fighting against ISIS in Syria?  Every serious news talks about the war crimes the USA has been committing in Syria.  Just take the recent bombing of Rakka and murdering of many innocent civilians.  Or news claiming the Americans are saving senior ISIS leaders and taking them away from Deir es Zor at night together with their families.  Or killing Russian General Asapov by the American spetsnaz.  There has been no such thing as Russian-American coalition in the Middle East, unless you accept the fact the American army is badly split into the good guys and the bad guys, which is extremely dangerous.  What do you say?

Sincerely,
Vlad

 

Hello Vlad,

It is a sad truth that Western mercenary armies working for oil companies and the Zionists have been doing very bad things in Syria and the region.  The fact is the U.S. is bankrupt and needs to keep stealing oil in order to survive.

However, the people at the top of the U.S. military are now trying to do the right thing in my view, and at the very least they are determined not to let the Khazarians start World War 3.

The U.S. military did tell me they had a deal that Russia’s zone of influence was supposed to be to the west of the Euphrates and the American zone to the east of the Euphrates.  I guess they felt the Russians broke that deal when they crossed east of the river.  However, it is also a fact that the Americans are breaking international law by being in Syria in the first place.

I think a big meeting will be needed to determine once and for all how to divide up the oil and gas in the region.  Also, of course, the rogue state of Israel needs to be forced to give up their plans for creating a greater Israel and instead do what international society has been asking them to do since 1967, and that is to reach a permanent peace deal with the Palestinians.

Sincerely yours,
Benjamin Fulford

 

2017-10-16

Summit between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un Being Negotiated as Khazarian Mafia Attempts to Start War Fail

 

By  White Dragon Society  206 Comments
The Khazarian mafia’s rule by murder, blackmail, bribery, and propaganda is being systematically dismantled in ways that can no longer be denied.  These fanatics, who wish to force human history down a path to destruction based on ancient books, have failed yet again in recent efforts to start World War 3.  This was seen in North Korea, in Kurdistan, and in Iran as their increasingly desperate gambits are checked at every corner.

In the case of Iran, U.S. President Donald Trump was threatened and blackmailed into renouncing the nuclear deal with Iran, but facing opposition from the military as well as top allies, all that Trump could do was to appease the Khazarians with bellicose rhetoric.  Even Trump’s rhetoric was met with a statement by the leaders of top U.S. allies the UK, Germany, and France contradicting Trump’s claims that Iran was breaking the nuclear deal.

The statement read in part that the deal “was unanimously endorsed by the UN Security Council in Resolution 2231.  The International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly confirmed Iran’s compliance with the JCPoA through its long-term verification and monitoring programme.”

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/declaration-by-the-heads-of-state-and-government-of-france-germany-and-the-united-kingdom

In other words, they were telling Trump not to start a war based on lies.  This is something I have never seen the like of in many years of watching diplomatic statements.

In fact, the only country to support Trump’s bellicose rhetoric was the rogue Khazarian slave state of Saudi Arabia.  In any case, Saudi Arabia’s satanic rulers are about to lose their main protector, as Israeli police close in on satanic pseudo-Jewish Israeli leader Benyamin Netanyahu.

The attempts by the Khazarians to use North Korea to start World War 3 are also failing.  Last week two senior Japanese politicians made a secret visit to North Korea to negotiate a summit meeting between Donald Trump and North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un when Trump visits Asia in November, according to a source close to the Japanese imperial family.

This meeting, if it takes place (a final decision is pending), would probably pave the way for a peace deal as well as reunification of the Korean Peninsula.  However, an even bigger announcement than that may also be in the works.  According to senior Pentagon and Asian Secret Society sources a decision to

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.
 

2017-10-13

Cryptocurrency State of Play – Special Report from the WDS

By  White Dragon Society  31 Comments
(Some sections translated from Chinese)

The purpose of this article is to summarize the financial and economic state of the world and the potential for cryptocurrency technologies to replace existing financial systems.  We delve into some of the many interesting new cryptocurrency startup projects that are springing up, and also explore the more esoteric and nefarious side of the growing cryptocurrency world.

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.
 

H.F.1355

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 
  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
    •
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BRITAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro

By James Slack Political Editor For The Daily Mail



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

Brexit will let us rediscover role as trading power | Daily Mail Online

Theresa May's Brexit speech puts Cameron to shame | Daily Mail ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Commons and Lords get ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Full reports and analysis

 

A great nation is reborn: Quitting will let us rediscover our role as a ...

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.
 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

  WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

  WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

  WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

  

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

 *		 7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

  WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

  WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW
 
 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 
Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 
 

DAILY MAIL

 

WHY

 DOESN'T

 the

House of  Lords

move

to

BRUSSELS?

RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-

March 3, 2017

Why doesn't the House of Lords move to

BRUSSELS?

 
 

EXTRACT

NOT for the FIRST TIME, it fell to Norman Tebbit to speak for Britain.

Why was it, he asked his fellow members of the Lords, that they were elevating the

RIGHTS OF FOREIGNERS

over those of the

BRITISH PEOPLE.

'It seems to me the

FIRST DUTY of PARLIAMENT

of the

UNITED KINGDOM

is to care for the

INTERESTS OF THE CITIZENS OF THIS KINGDOM'

he  said.

'If we are to be concerned about the rights of anybody after

BREXIT

to live anywhere on this continent of Europe, it should be concern for the

RIGHTS  OF BRITISH PEOPLE

to live freely and peacefully in those other parts of Europe.

WHY

is everybody here today so excited about an amendment which looks after

FOREIGNERS

and

 NOT

THE BRITISH

Fair point. But judging by the reaction in the chamber, you'd have thought Norman had advocated rounding up all foreign nationals living in Britain and deporting them en masse, preferably by gunpoint. His perfectly accurate use of the word

'FOREIGNERS'

had some sensitive Lords and Ladies gasping for their breath and hissing their disapproval at this ghastly racist in their midst.

 Lord Skinhead of Chingford was, of course. merely questioning the demand that before triggering

ARTICLE 50

[ March 15 -2017?]

Theresa May gives a cast iron guarantee that

ALL

EU CITIZENS living in Britain will be allowed to stay after Brexit.

Actually, she's already tried to do that in exchange for a reciprocal assurance that the same will apply to UK citizens living in Europe.

BUT

she was knocked back by

ANGELA MERKEL

who refuses to enter any kind of negotiation until  the Brexit process is under way.

It has become almost compulsory for everyone to agree that those EU nationals who have settled here-keep the

RIGHT TO STAY.

AND it,s true that the majority of EU citizens who have arrived legally over the past few years make a valuable contribution to our economy.

BUT

could the same be said of some of the less desirable elements who have moved to Britain?

The Eastern European beggars and pickpockets littering the streets of our cities for instance, or the assorted criminals we can't deport because of the

EUROPEAN YUMAN RITES RACKET.

The Remoaners don't want to talk about

THEM

naturally.

And frankly, the Lords aren't really bothered about the RIGHTS of EU citizens living in Britain.

It  is merely a convenient device to try to

DISRUPT and IDEALLY PREVENT BRITAIN'S DEPARTURE from THE

[UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-SO-CALLED]

EUROPEAN UNION...

They hold the democratically expressed wishes of more than 17 million voters in contempt and will do everything they can to frustrate the result of the

 REFERENDUM.

Why else would they want to force Mother Theresa to declare her negotiating position in advance?

No one in their right mind shows their cards before bidding in a poker game. Not unless that want to get taken to the cleaners.

No self-respecting union leader or businessman would offer up one-sided concessions before negotiations had ever begun.

What the Remoaners refuse to accept is that Britain holds the winning hand. We buy more from the EU than they buy from us.

The Europeans realise that, which is why they are going to bluff for as long as possible. Can you imagine any politician in Europe behaving like the

REMAIN CAMP in BRITAIN?

Where's the European equivalent of

PROJECT FEAR, warning of the dire consequences of losing access to the lucrative BRITISH MARKET?

Where are the apocalyptic warning from the EUROPEAN BANK that millions of jobs will be lost and the EU will go into FINANCIAL MELTDOWN unless BRUSSELS can strike a favourable DEAL WITH THE UK?

Where are the demands in Britain that Mrs Merkel offers

BRITISH MANUFACTURERS FREE TRADE

for BMW, Mercedes and Audi being allowed to continue to selling

TARIFF-FREE in BRITAIN.

WHERE'S Holland's answer to Anna Soubry touring the TV and radio studios in the Netherlands, complaining tearfully that the Dutch economy is doomed unless they give Britain everything she wants?

Why aren't French hardliners marching down the Champs Elysees, smashing windows and setting fire to police cars, demanding that Paris must agree unconditionally to BRITAIN'S TERMS so they can carry on exporting thie

CHEESES, WINES and MEAT? I don't recall the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT passing a MOTION forcing Jean-Claude Drunker to make any concessions to BRITAIN before the FORMAL BREXIT TALKS START.

And unless I've missed something, how many former

 GERMAN CHANCELLORS-FRENCH PRESIDENTS and ITALIAN PRIME MINISTERS have OPENLY SIDED WITH BRITAIN, in the same way that

 BLAIR and MAJOR

HAVE BACKED EUROPE AGAINST THEIR OWN PEOPLE?

NO,

all we've heard from across the CHANNEL are THREATS to PUNISH US, to CRIPPLE US ECONOMICALLY, to MAKE OUR LIVES HELL ONCE WE ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO LEAVE THE EU.

YET

the overwhelming instinct of our

TRAITOROUS

POLITICAL CLASS

is to bind the hands of our negotiators, to

APPEASE, COMPROMISE and ultimately SURRENDER-with the UNELECTED HOUSE OF LORDS acting as a PRO-BRUSSELS FIFTH COLUMN,

determined to

BETRAY THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE THEY ARE PAID TO REPRESENT..

Are they setting themselves up as

EU's VICHY GOVERNMENT?

MAYBE THEY SHOULD MOVE TO BRUSSELS.

IN wartime, they'd have been put up against a wall and shot

[AND THERE WOULD BE PLENTY OF VOLUNTEERS TO DO JUST THIS TODAY IN MARCH 2017.]

It's a pity Norman Tebbit isn't a few years younger. We could have put him in charge of the Brexit negotiations.

AT LEAST HE'D SPEAK FOR BRITAIN.

*  *  *

 

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MARCH 3 -2017

H. F.1126 FREEDOM NOW

Library books saying it's OK to beat your wife if she refuses sex are among misogynistic material found in Islamic schools across Britain

  • Ofsted has put together a file of the worst examples of discrimination and sexism its inspectors found in schools

  • Among the books they found was one titled 'women who deserve to go hell'

  • One school Ofsted visited encouraged children to read a text that contrasted the 'noble women of the East' with the 'internally torn woman of the West'

  • The findings comes as Muslims girls wearing the hijab in primary schools will be quizzed as to why by inspectors 

By Thomas Burrows for MailOnline

 November 28,2017

 

Amanda Spielman, the chief inspector, has said she wants to ensure that children at religious schools are prepared for 'life in modern Britain'

Library books claiming hell is mostly full of women because they are 'ungrateful to their husbands' have been found in Islamic schools, it has emerged.

Ofsted has put together a file of the worst examples of discrimination and sexism its inspectors found in schools.

Among the library books they found was one titled 'women who deserve to go hell' which claimed it was wrong for wives to show 'ingratitude to their husband' or have 'tall ambitions'. 

And it advises pupils: 'In the beginning of the 20th century, a movement for the freedom of women was launched with the basic objective of driving women towards aberrant ways.'

The book was written by Egyptian preacher Mansoor Abdul Hakim.  

Other books said in a Muslim marriage 'the wife is not allowed to refuse sex to her husband' or 'leave the house where she lives without his permission' while boys and girls were taught the 'man by way of correction can also beat her'. 

One school Ofsted visited encouraged children to read a text that contrasted the 'noble women of the East' with the 'internally torn woman of the West'.

It claimed western women attract men and hang around aimlessly in cinemas and cafés. 

The materials came from state-funded schools as well as private faith schools and those running illegally as under-the-radar madrassas without registering with the government.

Inspectors also claimed teachers said that women had a responsibility 'only to bear children and bring them up as Muslims', The Times reported. 

In a box entitled 'daily life and relationships', a pupil had written that men are 'physically stronger' and women are 'emotionally weaker'.

The worksheet was covered in approving red ticks from the teacher. 

Ofsted insiders said the discovery of the books made for 'uncomfortable reading'.  

There are 177 Muslim schools in England, of which 148 are independent, and the rest state-funded.

The Department for Education has been contacted for comment. 

The findings comes as Muslims girls wearing the hijab in primary schools will be quizzed as to why by inspectors.
 
 

The findings by Ofsted comes as Muslims girls wearing the hijab in primary schools will be quizzed as to why by inspectors (file picture)

Head of Ofsted Amanda Spielman said creating an environment where Muslim children are expected to wear the headscarf 'could be interpreted as sexualisation of young girls'.   

It comes after it was revealed a fifth of 800 primary schools now list the headscarf in their uniform policy.

This is despite the fact a hijab is usually only worn by young women after puberty and in front of men for modesty reasons - not by primary school children.

Campaigners have said it should be 'fiercely resisted' and claimed it could 'sexualise' young children. 

Aisha Ali-Khan, a Muslim feminist campaigner and a teacher for 13 years, told MailOnline: 'The hijab should be banned from primary schools but local authorities are afraid of causing offence to the Muslim community and afraid of being branded as racist.

'A headscarf or hijab, is usually worn by girls who have reached puberty, to prevent unwanted sexual advances from men.

'How can a four or five year old child make an informed choice? It's not allowed in Islam so why is it being allowed in schools? You should only do something if you want to and understand the concept behind it.

'But the local authorities are too scared to go back and our government has allowed this to be part of the school policy and that's wrong. They are allowing decisions to be made by schools and local authorities which is worrying and they are trying to wash their hands of all responsibility.'

Gina Khan, a children's rights campaigner in Birmingham, added: 'Schools are allowing it because they are afraid of being called Islamophobic and they have been told that this is a religious garment - but they need to support Muslim girls to have free choices, not to be set apart from other children.' 

But the Muslim Council of Britain said Ofsted's policy was 'deeply worrying'.

Secretary general Harun Khan said: 'It is deeply worrying that Ofsted has announced it will be specifically targeting and quizzing young Muslim girls who choose to wear the headscarf.

'It sends a clear message to all British women who adopt this that they are second-class citizens, that while they are free to wear the headscarf, the establishment would prefer that they do not.'

He added that many British Muslims who wear the headscarf have done 'extremely well' in education.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5125623/Books-saying-OK-beat-wife-Islamic-schools.html#ixzz500TscQny
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook 

NOVEMBER 28,2016

 

H.F.1398-A SETTLED KINGDOM.(?)
 

A SOFT BREXIT MEANS

 NO

BREXIT

 

 

STEPHEN GLOVER on how a Norway-type solution would mean Britain would have to accept EU laws without having any influence over them 

 

[ A  MOST TRAITOROUS EUROPHILE-WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN SACKED LONG-LONG AGO.]

[ A DESTROYER OF A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE]

13/06/17 23:35

Since the election a myth has sprouted, seemingly shared by Philip Hammond, that voters were against a 'hard' Brexit - despite Labour and the Tories vowing to leave the single market. ...read

 

A soft Brexit means no Brexit:

The truth is that the term ‘soft Brexit’ is endlessly and lazily repeated without it ever being properly examined. As soon as it is, it disintegrates into dust. Theresa May should call the bluff of these myopic Tory Remainers.

Don’t they realise their antics give comfort to Michel Barnier and Jean-Claude Juncker in Brussels? Mrs May has been weakened by losing her overall majority. Barnier even had the gall yesterday to tell the British Government to hurry up. How overjoyed the Eurocrats will be if they see her under attack by her own party.

And then what? A Tory split can only have one outcome — which is Jeremy Corbyn and his hard-Left clique ruling this country. We came far too close for comfort last week. It wouldn’t take much to put this unsavoury extremist in No 10.

A soft Brexit is no Brexit.

 It’s not an option for this country. It certainly isn’t worth splitting the Tory Party by fighting over it, and giving cheer to EU negotiators in Brussels.

And despite what Mr Hammond and others may claim, despite all the disappointments of last Thursday, there isn’t a shred of evidence that the British people have changed their minds about wanting

 BREXIT.


 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4601626/A-soft-Brexit-means-no-Brexit-STEPHEN-GLOVER.html#ixzz4kH5M4a1d
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

[A reminder to Philip Hammond]

INDEPENDENCE

'The word independence is united to ideas of dignity and virtue; the word dependence, to ideas of inferiority and corruption.'

J.BENTHAM (1748-1832) -Eng.philosopher.

[The main attraction for a politician is the power and profit within the bureaucracy of the EU-:Mandleson-Kinnock and Family and many-many others.]

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JUNE 13-2017

H.F.1227-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 

[WHAT THE EU AND THE SO-CALLED HUMAN RIGHTS ACT HAS ACCOMPLISHED]

 

The marauding migrants from Africa threaten our standard of living, says Phillip Hammond

  1. Marauding migrants threaten our standard of

     

     

    living,

     

    says ... - Daily Mail-Monday,August 10,2015
     

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../The-marauding-migrants-Africa-threaten-standard-living-says-Philip-Hammond-Foreign-Secretary-says-not-possible-Europe-...

     

    AND

  3. 300,000!

     

     

    That was the overall number of migrants last year - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/...

    /Humiliation-Cameron-net-migration-hits-298-000-despite-promise-

    cut-tens-thousands-

     

    ‎ *


     

  4. Immigration Concern-info

    ‎

 

 

Crackdown on rogue firms using illegals

ROGUE firms employing illegal migrants face a major crackdown this autumn, it emerged last night

Ministers will dramatically ramp up action against illegal workers in a drive to create a 'hostile environment'.

The probe, which will involve hundreds of raids, will focus on construction, care and cleaning industries, it was reported

Immigration minister James Brokenshire told the Times:   'Rogue employers who give jobs to illegal migrants are denying work to UK citizens and legal migrants and helping driving down wages.

Meanwhile, a new IMMIGRATION BILL to be published this autumn will tackle the scourge of exploited illegal immigrants given low wages to work in poor conditions.

FOREIGN NATIONALS welcomed to Britain for the 2012 Olympics are STILL HERE-ILLEGALLY despite LOSING THEIR ASYLUM CLAIMS

Ministers have revealed that 18 of the thousands of athletes and coaches given Olympic visas HAVE DODGED BEING KICKED OUT OF THE COUNTRY despite officials rejecting applications for REFUGEE STATUS

Another 54 were given political asylum after refusing to return home after the London Games. ONLY TEN HAVE BEEN KICKED OUT.

The figures were revealed by Tory MP Phillip Davies , who said:

WE MUST BE A LAUGHING STOCK AROUND THE WORLD. NO WONDER THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS IN CALAIS ARE SO DESPERATE TO GET HERE.   WE WILL HAVE HAD THE RIO OLYMPICS BEFORE WE MANAGE TO ROOT OUT THESE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS FROM THE LONDON OLYMPICS.'

*

[As an island people now comprising  within its territory possibly every race on PLANET EARTH with ENGLAND known as  of the most crowded country in Europe and no doubt in the world.. We ask how has it come to this? To a people who have a natural barrier-the sea. Well! we all know the answer!

FIRST! because we are in the  MAD HOUSE-EU

SECOND! because we are in the iniquitous so-called HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

THIRDLY! because successive governments have failed to remember the warning of the far-seeing Enock Powell so many decades ago

FOURTHLY! because the  the PEOPLE were slow to wake-up to the reality of the situation during the BLIAR REIGN.

FIFTHLY! because many voters who could not stomach a LABOUR GOVERNMENT and who  would have voted UKIP decided to save the CON PARTY

The political system in our country needs to change-URGENTLY! ]

 UK voting system 'ignores will of millions'

by Daniel Martin-Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24... 

*  *  *

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

AND IN

NOVEMBER 2017, WHAT HAVE THE SMALLER POLITICAL PARTIES SUCH AS THE GREENS-UKIP AND OTHERS DONE ABOUT GETTING THE LAW CHANGED ON THIS MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN OUR DEMOCRACY TODAY?

ABSOLUTELY

 

NOTHING!

WAKE UP! ENGLAND

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 10-2015

H F 520

Searches related to eu latest news on brexit

brexit what is it

brexit news today

brexit news immigration

brexit eu citizens

brexit news live

brexit latest poll

brexit news latest

grexit and brexit

KEEP UP TO DATE WITH THE LATEST NEWS

ON ENGLAND LEAVING HITLER'S 194O's PLAN

 FOR GERMAN DOMINATION IN THE PEACE.

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/  ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/ ****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

AS WE ALL NOW KNOW DAVID CAMERON ONLY CALLED FOR A REFERENDUM ON JUNE 23-2016 ON THE EU BECAUSE HE WAS SO CONFIDENT THAT' HE HAD IT IN THE BAG'.

[JUST A FEW OF THE OVER 1000 BULLETINS ON OUR WEBSITE OVER 14 YEARS OF THE

COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-UNACCOUNTABLE-UNDEMOCRATIC-WASTEFUL-EXPENSIVE-DESTROYER OF FREEDOM AND SERVANT OF BABEL.]

[MUCH OF OUR WORK REVEALING THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU SINCE 2005 HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A NUMBER OF PATRIOTS  SUCH AS THE

TRUE PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

CHRISTOPHER+STORY

ON THE

THE+EUROPEAN+UNION+COLLECTIVE-ENEMY+OF+ITS+MEMBER+STATES+BY+PATRIOT-CHRISTOPHER+STORY

*

JUNE 19-2017

THE LINKS BELOW  ARE TO OTHER

TRUTHSEEKERS AND PATRIOTS

H.F1228-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

EU QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

There are over 1000 Bulletins on the EU in our

BULLETIN FILE and EU FILE

 CLICK FOR TOP TOPICS

JUNE -2009

1]  EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU ?

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10]    VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]    100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT1          100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT2

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007] -NOT MUCH LUCK HERE!

33]    ALMOST 50% OF EU BUDGET SPENT ON CAP FATCATS

34] SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU

35] WHY BRITISH BUSINESS IS TURNING AGAINST THE EU

36] BRITISH CONSTITUTION-IDENTITY AND VALUES

37] MODERN DILEMA IN POLITICS-TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM.

38] LETTER FROM LORD KILMUIR TO TED HEATH WITH TRUE FACTS OF EU

39] INTERVIEW WITH RUSSIAN DISSIDENT WHO WARNED OF EU DICTATORSHIP

40]   The Truth About A Federal Europe - Part I

41]   Cost of EU to UK - £4,811 million in 2003= 40 District Hospitals equipped and staffed and funded.

42]  CAN THE 1972 ACCESSION TREATY TO THE EU BE REPEALED?

43]  Neil Kinnock in glover - but failed to stop the Shadow of graft over EU’s £68bn spending.

44]  Now the EU wants a single Foreign Office to replace Nation-States Embassies.

45]   How the EU takes over Nation-States.

46]  A Fabian Europhile of 1947 supported Independent Nation-States and the Rule of Law

47]       The New European Constitution - Part 1

48]  12-Point Summary of EU Constitution continued - Part 2

49]  The New European Constitution - Part 1

50]  An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.

51]   Britain takes over as biggest contributor to the EU Budget

52]  Neil Kinnock sacked honest Auditor because of refusal to sign off questionable EU Accounts.

53]  General De Gaulle acclaims British national institutions back in 1960.

54]  Brussels scams can let an MEP fiddle £60,000 a year.

55]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 1

56]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 2

57]  Europe and a conspiracy of Silence.

58]  Ninety-nine countries will soon have Free Trade with EU -without paying a cent to Brussels.

59]   Britain must leave the EU as UN show best area for expansion will be USA-Anglo.Saxon sphere.

60]  82 million Germans have no say as MP’s back EU Constitution.

61]  The EU big brother policy reaches back over two millennium.

62]   Europe: It’s the modern version of the white man’s burden.

63]   E U COUNCIL OF MINISTERS.

64]  EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.

65] German - Nazi - Geopolitical Centre established in Madrid in 1943 by Heinrich Himmler.

66]  What were the Dark Actors Playing Games, which the patriot Dr David Kelly referred?

67]  DEMOCRACY IS A DIALECTICAL FARCE BECAUSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES CALL THE SHOTS NOT SO-CALLED DEMOCRACIES.

68]  Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

69]  EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE.

70]  NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

71]   WHY NO TREATY LIMITING EU POWERS

72]   THE E.U.’S VERY OWN AESOPIAN LANGUAGE.

73]    WHAT IF ENGLAND HADN'T JOINED THE EU

74]   67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM EU

75]   WILL IRELAND SAVE EUROPE FROM ITSELF?

76]   WHY EU REGIONAL POLICY WILL DESTROY THE NATION STATE

77]   EMPIRES HAVE GONE AND MOST PEOPLE LIVE IN NATION STATES.

78 THE FINAL BETRAYAL- WHICH TOOK PLACE IN 2008 

79]  WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR-NOW BROWN-SHE DIDN'T - BUT SOLD US TO THE EU80] 

80]  Almost everything ,which is precious in our civilisation, has come from small States

81]  THE EU BIG BROTHER POLICY REACHES BACK OVER TWO MILLENNIUM

82]   THE EURO A DOOMED CURRENCY

83]  GERMANY AS STRONG MAN OF EUROPE

84]  BRITAIN AND EUROPE-THE CULTURE OF DECEIT

85]  NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

86]  A BETTER WAY FORWARD TOGETHER IN EUROPE-OUT OF THE EUROPEAN UNIOn

87]   A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

88]   TO CONTROL OUR COURTS AND BORDERS IS THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL EUROSCEPTIC STRATEGY.
89] BLACK OPERATIONS AND TRICKERY BIND UK TO EU
90]  HITLER-HAUSHOFER AND GEORGE KENNON-PENTAGON PLANS IDENTICAL
91]  Oh Boyo - Family on Brussels gravy train cost TAXPAYER £34 million and RISING!
92]   NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

93]    WHY DID THEY WANT BRITAIN IN EUROPE -  IN 1963
94]   Lies and The Betrayal of Britain
95]    Be Warned - The lies of 1975 still haunt us
96]   THe Strange Case of the Werner Report
97]   1972 EU Communities Act
98]   Further 200 Reasons why to Reject the Euro and E
99]  New elite threatens EU project admits Lib-Dem Peer
100]     The secretive Bilderberger Group will destroy True Democracy
101] BBC EUROPHILE BIAS-UPDATE-by LORD PEARSON

102]   How ‘a good European’ turned into a eurosceptic whistle-blower

103]   HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007
104]    IF Gordon Brown forces this EU TREATY on us, you can kiss goodbye to DEMOCRACY  -HE DID!
105]   FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ARE THE FUTURE OF WORLD TRADE
106]   Twelve Mighty Reasons why you must say 'No' to the EU

107]        How much does it cost the UK in the EU
108]   THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL
109]   IF MONETARY UNION GOES-EUROPEAN PROJECT IS UNDERMINED
 
 
 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE-2009

H. F .11 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 
 

DAILY MAIL

 

ALEX BRUMMER: Long-suffering taxpayers deserve a proper tribunal into what went wrong at banks

Daily Mail City Editor Alex Brummer

22/07/14 23:29

The inability of the Treasury Select Committee to get at the full story of how the UK banks handled themselves at the time of the financial crisis and in the period since underlines why it is still so important for there to be a judicial inquiry into the panic and its aftermath, with interviews conducted under oath and full disclosure of documents. ...read

 

22/07/14 01:28 S

i

How our banks pulled off the most cynical scam of all time: We all know how millions fell victim to banks selling insurance they didn't need. But this gripping inside account reveals greed so obscene it'll make your jaw drop

Banker Robber P29.jpg

22/07/14 00:42

In his new book Alex Brummer looks at how banks got away with mis-selling PPI - now officially Britain’s worst consumer scandal of all time. ...read

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 21-2014

H F 180

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 
 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF

ENGLAND

 AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS
 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/  ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/ ****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY / ****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS
 
 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/
Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

 YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

 THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

 SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

 HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 
UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 
 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
 

 
 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

 

BACK TO:

 

DECFREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017  (1994 -Official Website -DEC-PT4-2017 )-- DEC FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017