MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
 

HOME

 
     
 

NO 243

[2003]

ROGUE [POLITICAL-CORPORATE-MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN ] AMERICA

www.Vernoncoleman.org

The intrusive habit of adding fluoride to water supplies began in America in 1945 and is now common throughout the so-called developed world.

When politicians were told that tooth decay was more prevalent in areas where fluoride was not a natural constituent of local water supplies they decided to reduce health costs by artificially adding [the poison] fluoride to water supplies.

There were several reasons why you should dissapprove of adding fluoride to drinking water.

FIRST, putting fluoride into drinking water is a dangerous business. the amount of fluoride that can safely be added to drinking water has to be judged very carefully.  Too much fluoride can cause bone disorders and cancer.  Way back in 1986 the World Health Organisation  published a report expressing concern about the incidence of problems caused by excessive fluoride in drinking water supplies.  Even if you feel that you can trust the scientists to get their sums right when calculating how much fluoride should be added ( and don't forget that no one at the water company has the faintest idea how much water you are going to drink) there is a real danger that a water company employee may add the wrong amount of fluoride to your drinking water.  Do not accept the bland reassurances from your water company.  They will undoubtedly assure you that they have checking systems which would make such a mishap quite impossible.  Ignore these reassurances.  If your water company is adding chemicals such as fluoride to your drinking water there is a not insignificant chance that one day an employee will make a mistake and poison you.  And unless the error is so terrible that it immediately causes obvious ill health there is a very good chance that you will never even know THAT A MISTAKE HAS BEEN MADE.

SECOND, many people are allergic to chemicals such as fluoride and may be made ill by drinking water that has had fluoride added to it.

THIRD, tthere has to be a real risk that the fluoride which is added to drinking water may interact in some unpredictable way with any one of the many other chemicals which these days occur naturally in many drinking water supplies.  The water which comes out of your tap is already likely to contain nitrates (which will have accumulated because of the widespread use of fertilizers in the countryside), Chlorine and aluminium sulphate (often added deliberately by water companies) and lead and copper from the pipes which are used to bring water into your home.   Whenever chemicals exist in solution together there are chemical reactions.  I don't know what all these chemicals will do when they meet one another.  And I don't think anyone else really knows either.

Adding chemicals to drinking water is a gross intrusion.  Fluoride is merely the beginning and if we allow the scientists, politicians and water companies to get away with this there is no knowledge where where it will all end. One scientist has already suggested that drinking water should have antibiotics added to it (arguing that this would reduce the risk of infection and so reduce health costs).  A second  serious suggestion has been that contraceptives be added to drinking in order to reduce the birth rate.  And another suggestion has been that tranquillisers be added to drinking water in order to reduce anxiety levels ( and , presumably, keep the voters quit).   It is of course, already commonplace for farmers to add

HORMONES-ANTIBIOTICS and TRANQUILLISERS

to water (and feed) which they supply to their

ANIMALS.

www.Vernoncoleman.org

 

*

FLUORIDE FILE

 

 

 OTHER VERNON COLEMAN POINTS OF VIEW: NO 3 [A HISTORY OF THE OIL INDUSTRY IN IRAQ / IRAN AND ITS BRUTAL CONSEQUENCES FOR ITS PEOPLES.]NO 514- A MATTER OF URGENCY- OUT OF CONTROL PATENT LAW IN USA WILL COST THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD A FORTUNE AND POSSIBLY YOUR LIFE / NO 116-  WORLD'S LARGEST CORPORATIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR MORE DEATHS -EVERY DAY-THAN BY BUSH NOW OBAMA'S WAR-

www.Vernoncoleman.org

 

 

NO 131

 

ROGUE [POLITICAL-CORPORATE-MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN ] AMERICA

 

A new global trade agreement organised by America will privatise most GOVERNMENT provided PUBLIC SERVICES and will allow INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONS to run SERVICES FOR PROFIT.  The General Agreement on TRADE in SERVICES (GATS) was established in 1994 and was adopted by the WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION in 1995

GATS is a free trade agreement which will 'liberalise' social services and public welfare provided by governments.  When GATS is fully implemented it will entitle INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONS to PROFIT from PRIVATISATION of SCHOOLS, CHILD CARE, HEALTH CARE, POSTAL SERVICES, AIR AND WATER SUPPLIES, PUBLIC TRANSPORT, MUSEUMS AND LIBRARIES.

GATS will make it ILLEGAL for any GOVERNMENT to go back to providing PUBLICLY OWNED , NON-PROFIT MAKING SERVICES.

In America Health Management Organisations are now wide-spread and Educational management Organisations (EMOs) are springing up rapidly. The aim of these organisations is, of course PROFITABILITY rather than providing a PUBLIC SERVICE. GATS officials want restrictions which will LIMIT any government's ability to bring in environmental and health laws which might hinder 'free trade'

The World Trade Organisation is, of course, widely acknowledged to be controlled by the USA.

*

 

[The WTO and the WHO and IMF and the Bank of International Settlements in Switzerland with many other INTERNATIONAL BODIES are also controlled by the ILLUMINATI through the COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS who with their SERVANTS the  BILDERBERGERS who as we have already shown you dominate the EXECUTIVE and OPPOSITION parties in WESTMINSTER who will do their bidding.  Of cause, privatisation in particular cases can be a useful tool but what we have here is a complete take-over by in many cases by FOREIGN INTERESTS which would not be tolerated by certain E U countries who PROTECT THEIR OWN from being dominated by INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONS who are in many instances are in the hands of the INTERNATIONAL BANKSTERS. ]

 

 

NO133

The North American Free Trade Agreement [NAFTA] gives INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONS the RIGHT to SUE governments for LOST PROFITS. Potential future profits can be claimed and , astonishingly, new laws or regulations which are imposed to PROTECT the PUBLIC INTEREST can lead to COMPENSATION.  For example, in MEXICO a company won a  lawsuit against the Mexican Government and will receive $16.7 million of Mexican taxpayers' money in COMPENSATION for 'profits lost because the (Mexican) Government stopped it building a TOXIC WASTE DUMP'.

 see..More!

www.vernoncoleman.com  - [2003]

*

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?searchPhrase=Sean+Poulter-%27Monster%27+fish

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

HOME