- (1994 -Official Website - FEBRUARY-PART 1-2019 )-

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019          FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019          FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 5-2019

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 6-2019      FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2019

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-PAGE 2-2019

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE
BULLETINS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

 

 

We

Germans

have insulted Britain. How can we have forgotten the huge debt we owe you.

 

News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

As MARCH 29 looms closer, here in Germany, rabid anti-British sentiment is part of the daily discourse.

The chattering classes-politicians and pundits alike-are urging our Angela Merkel, to harden her line towards the United Kingdom after suggestions that she was prepared to throw Theresa May a lifeline. Indeed last week Annegret Kramp -Karrenbauer, Merkel's successor -in-waiting calls for Britain to scrap Brexit completely. Germans are far from alone in this attitude. In the wake of the momentous Commons defeat for your Prime Minister's Brexit strategy, the European Commission twisted the thumbscrews still further. have been unshakable

Michel Barnier, the EU's Brexit negotiator, suggested it was time for the EU to abandon its 'red lines' over ending freedom of movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

 Yet these issues have been unshakable stipulations for the British since the beginning of talks. To casually propose dumping them in this way is insulting to your country.

 Regret

The French president, Emmanuel Macron, was, regrettably, similarly dismissive when he said that

 Brexit

was a

BRITISH PROBLEM

and one it would have to solve on its own. Such blinkered and sour responses are, in my view, wrong-headed. They ignore the great debt that Germany, and the whole Continent, owes our friends across the Channel.

However much we in Europe regret your decision  to leave our Community, we must always remember that, throughout your history, independence and sovereignty have been

PARAMOUNT.

Germany in particular should tread lightly when it comes to dealing with

YOUR PROUD NATION.

It was Great Britain that first stood up to Hitler in 1939. And it was Britain that opened its doors to the thousands of Jew-doors to the thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing certain death during the Holocaust.

Put simply, there would be no free Europe without you and the bloody sacrifice you made to rescue the Continent. This plain fact has not always been a popular one, of course. The truth is that there has been a long tradition of policies aimed at excluding the British Isles from Europe, most notably those of French president Charles De Gaulle.

After the war, inspired by dreams of the medieval empire that stretched across  the Continent under Charlemagne, De Gaulle poured his energy into setting up the European economic Community -the forerunner of the EU.

But when Britain enquired about membership in the early Sixties, his answer was an emphatic 'Non' Thanks to De Gaulle's opposition, it took more than a decade for the UK to be accepted. And the driving force for unity for welcoming British membership with open arms was the German chancellor of the Sixties, Konrad Adenauer.

For that, ultimately, we can thank the QUEEN...

[[TREASON]

STYLE...

...Seen from that perspective it's imperative that Brexit is achieved with a degree of aplomb and decorum. At this crucial moment. Europe must concede enough to let the UK leave with head held high-and do it in style.

If instead, our leaders continue to treat the British People with contempt, we will wreck those great ties between our countries that have been painstakingly created over many generations.

 Our societies have always thrived on mutual respect and admiration. We are brothers and sisters...and this family squabble has

GONE TOO FAR

 It is time for Chancellor Merkel to show other European leaders the way and for them to start treating your country as it deserves -with our

 

RESPECT and GRATITUDE.

*  *  *

This considerable  and most erudite  yet controversial and compelling article appears at a most crucial moment, in our long island history, to recover our once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

-To be completed shortly-in the meantime for the complete work click ]

Here!

STATEMENT

In Alexander Von Schoenburg's own words' a real statesman would kindle Adenauer's historic vision of a federation [of free nation states ]and not some kind of bloated super-state-a confederation that does not neglect the historical and free peculiarities of it's members-none of this is impossible.'

This statement  appears to be that of a future GREXIT leader-don't you think?

Alexander Von Schoenburg's  mea culpa on behalf of his country has justified the 'hard-stance 'of Brexiteers particularly those such as

JACOB REES-MOGG

AND

The other 17.4 miilion who voted in JUNE 2016

TO

LEAVE THE EU

The soon to be

SUPER STATE

AS SOON AS POSSIBLE

 UKIP and the later the DAILY MAIL deserted the battleground at a vital and crucial moment which gave succour to our enemies at home and within the EU. AS a result the present shambles we now see ourselves in with only weeks until our EXIT from the BIG BROTHER EUROPEAN UNION.

*  *  *

[We were against entry to

Hitler's plan for Europe

in 1972 and again in 1975.]

[WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE]

[ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS EITHER OURS OR OTHER CONTRIBUTORS.]

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

 

H.F.1784

 
 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

March against

The

 Donald!

News for DAILY MAIL-March against THE DONALD! by Richard Littlejohn

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: March against The Donald (that's Tusk, not Trump)

 

(That's TUSK not Trump

LOOKING forward to the march against  The Donald? Me too! It's time we showed this tinpot dictator exactly what the British people think of him.

Frankly we're had our fill of this preening middle-aged sexist pig throwing his weight around. We're sick of his arrogant tweets and contempt for democracy.

Who the hell does this self-styled 'Mr President' think he is? So join me Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson at the

STOP TUSK rally.

I,ve already ordered the inflatable Baby Donald to be flown over the Houses of Parliament.

While  I'm at it, maybe I'll commision giant hot air balloons of a naked Jean-Claude Drunker, Michael Barnier and Angela Merkel.

Then we can invite ther Provisional Wing of the Country Alliance to bring along their shotguns and blast these grotesque puffed -up politicians out of the sky, like grouse on the Glorious  Twelfth.

I'm sure Farage would lend me one of his matched Purdeys. If not, I'd settle for a second-hand sawn-off, left over from a South London blagging. What a joy it would be giving both barrels to effigies of Donald Tusk and the rest of mthe European elite.

Sorry, what's that? You thought when I referrred to Donald', I was talking about

PRESIDENT TRUMP

I can see why you might have leapt to that conclusion. The usual suspects are already salivating at the prospect of their next demo against Trump, when he arrives in Britain for the Nato summit in December.

That's if a a rumoured state vist this summer does't go ahead. His official trip, last July was an excuse for a petulant display of protests, which cost taxpayers

£14 MIILLION TO POLICE.

Thousands of demonstrators, many in fancy dress, marched through London in a carnival atmosphere, wearing novelty headgear and waving placards plastered with obscener slogans. No one has yet explained to me why a red

'Make America Great Again'

baseball  cap

is an affront

to

decency

 yet  a  hat resembling giant female  genitalia

  is  perfectly acceptable.

In Trafalgar square, they gathered under a 'Baby Trump' blimp, given the thumps up by London's two-bob chancer of a mayor Saqiq Khaqn, and cheered a succession of Left-wing rabble rousers heaping vitriol on the leader of our most important ally. Now they're limbering up to do it all over again. The Lib Dems (11 MPs and the Green Party (one MP) are promising to be 'front and centre'.

No doubt O. J. (Oh, Jeremy) Corbyn will be there, too, blaming America for the humanitarian crisis in bankrupt, corrupt, socialist Venezuela. Try stopping him.

And when this orgy of condemnation and self-congratulation is over, and everyone has repaired to the pub until Glastonbury comes around again, will any of them stop to think why they're protesting- and what on earth it is they hope to achieve?

Trump may be pretty unsavoury for the delicate palates of snowflake types and the dwindling band of prigs who still buy the Guardian

OK so he offends their own set of 'principles' and sense of self righteousness. But given that the people define themselves by who they hate, if Trump didn't exist they'd have to invent him

He's not exactly my cup of meat either. But his greatest virtue is his ability to send all the right people into a deranged frensy.

What Trump does on the home front is entirely a matter for the American voters, who elected him once already and will have to decide whether to award him a second term.

 

So WHAT if he puts

 'AMERICA FIRST' ?

THAT'S HIS JOB,

If only we had a Prime Minister who put

BRITAIN FIRST.

Rather than bite his hand off, all the resentful Remainer camp could do was scaremonger about chlorinated American chicken, which was going to wipe out half the population. (Never mind the poisonous Romanian horsemeat the EU sent us.)

U.S. military might has ensured the PEACE in EUROPE since WORLD WAR II, which is why it is perfectly appropriate that the President is coming to Britain in December to mark the

70th ANNIVERSARY OF THE NATO ALLIANCE

 

Yes, Trump managed to upset European leaders by insisting that they keep their side of the bargain and commit two per cent of GDP to defence. But he was right to do so. And his uncompromising negotiating stance paid dividends securing an extra 100 billion for Nato from Europe

It's a pity MotherTheresa has learned nothing from Trump's success in playing hardball with our 'partners' .Instead, she let's them trample a

ll over her.

I was only half-joking when I said we should march against

THE OTHER DONALD.

As Tusk's latest outburst illustrates only too well, he treats our female Prime Minister-and the British people -with distain, patronising  her with snide comments and snarky Tweets

Had Trump done the same, we'd never hear the last of it

 

President Trump, I repeat, only wants

FRIENDSHIP and FREE TRADE

TUSK and the rest of the self-perpetuating conga line of unelected EU 'presidents' aim to humiliate, subjugate and punish us into a permanent prisoner of their

ROTTEN, ANTIDEMOCRATIC EMPIRE.

 

The 17.4 million who voted Leave -Chesterton's 'secret people'-are not the type to take to the streets. Nor, it should be said, are most of the decent folk who backed Remain. We leave the demos to the noisy show-offs determined to draw attention to themselves, whatever the convenient cause

BUT IF WE MUST HAVE ANOTHER TIRESOME MARCH AGAINST A

THE DONALD,

LET'S GIVE TRUMP A MISS FOR ONCE, AND PROTEST AGAINST OUR

REAL ENEMY

DONOLD TUSK

News for DAILY MAIL-March against THE DONALD! by Richard Littlejohn

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: March against The Donald (that's Tusk, not Trump)

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1788

 had our fill mof this preening middle-aged sexist pig throwing his weight atround. WE're
LITTLEJOHN

 

 As Marx said, history does have the ... A Very British Coup revolved around a conspiracy by the military, the media, big business and M15...

 

 

So this is what a very British coup looks like.

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

SOME of you will recall the novel

A Very British Coup,

subsequently made into an award-winning television series on Channel 4.

It was written by Labour MP Chris Mullin, published in 1982, and revolved around a conspiracy by the

MILITARY-THE MEDIA-BIG BUSINESS-M15

to bring down a Left-wing government.

At the time, the plot was entirely credible, since Britain was riven by strikes and revolution was in the air. I read the book as a young labour and industrial correspondent, and it made sense to me.

 The Bennites were in the ascendancy, Margaret Thatcher was horribly unpopular and it looked as if the wizened Hampstead Leftie Michael Foot-Worzel Gummidge, as Private Eye dubbed him-would be our next Prime Minister.

Mullin's assumptions were based  on hard fact. In the Seventies there had been well-founded reports about the Establishment plot to depose Labour's Harold Wilson.

In some quarters, there were even rumblings of a military coup.

A couple of years ago, when the un reconstructed Bennite Jeremy Corbyn became leader, Mullen talked about writing a sequel. He imagined the Funny  People orchestrating a putsch to thwart a democratically elected Corbyn government.

Trouble is, history has a habit of not working out as you expect. Although, as Marx said, history does have the capacity to repeat itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. That's where we are right now. Except tragedy and farce are running in tandem.

WE are in the middle of

A VERY BRITISH COUP

but not as Mullin predicted. What we're seeing is an elaborate, well-financed and coordinated plot to overturn as extreme Left-wing Prime Minister

BUT

the democratically expressed will of the British people.

It's being mounted by the Government of the day, aided and abetted by Big Business and the Civil Service.

[A repeat of 1970's-again by a supposed Conservative Government.]

 

THIS is A  Very BRITISH Coup, only written by Lewis Carroll not Chris Mullin. In our new Looking Glass World, words mean-as Humpty Dumpty declared-whatever they want them to mean.

Thus the dwindling band of MPs sticking uo for the

17.4 MILLION who voted

LEAVE

are condemned as plotters and rebels

Those, including Theresa May, who are doing everything in their power to

PREVENT

BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU

and becoming once again a

PROUD SOVEREIGN NATION

are hailed absurdedly as true patriots

As I've said often enough, just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

About the only thing upon which I've ever agreed with Ken Livingstone - apart from cheap Tube fares - was when he wrote a book called

If Voting Changed Anything They'd Abolish it. The Establishment seems hell-bent on proving him

Right over Brexit .

[The EDP has over decades seen much evidence of this very fact and though continually bringing evidence to the surface nobody appears to be interested whether it is lack of Bobbies -on-the beat - Health Service in crisis-Pot-holes-closed Police Stations...Britons on worst State Pensions in the Europe-even Portugal is marginally more. And a bloated -wasteful and grotesque so-called FOREIGN AID which even some regimes as recipients have requested to be stopped .

I told  you the day after the referendum that the fix was already in . Now they're on the final furlongs

We're being informed, in no uncertain fashion that

OUR VOTES ARE WORTHLESS

that they don't count.

WE'RE TOO IGNORANT, TOO UNEDUCATED, TOO RACIST

To be taken seriously.

Politicians who try to square the circle are vilified.

One minute Dominic Raab, who attempted to make a go of being Brexit Secretary, is a principled pragmatic operator of the highest praise.

The next, when he is forced to resign because Mother Theresa has deliberately undermined his position and then lied about it, he's dismissed as a disloyal traitor. And If I hear anyone else demanding a second

'People's Vote'

I'll scream.

All they want to do is reverse the referendum result or give us three options so they can split the

LEAVE VOTE

To be honest, I can't take much more of this patronising guff. The Beeb's idea of discerning commentators these days seems to extend no further than 'Baroness' Shameless Chuckabutty, Potty Toynbee and Mad Alastair Campbell, the author of the dodgy dossier which took into an

ILLEGAL WAR IN IRAQ.

 

As I believe I may have observed before. Campbell is the only bloke I know with a certificate to prove he's sane.

And don't get me started on the CBI which throughout my career has been wrong about everything from joining the euro to the Thatcher reforms. The CBI speaks only for monopolistic, multinational megacorps, not the small-to-medium businesses which are the backbone of our economy and always get the rough end  of the pineapple from Brussels - even though they don't sell so much as a brass washer outside British borders.

Twenty-five-odd years ago, covering a CBI conference in Glasgow, I watched the chairman of Dunlop taking the stage wearing a kilt and waving a Union Jack, as part of an I'm Backing Britain campaign. The following week he sold the company to the Japanese.

These are the same people now claiming to have British interests at the heart of their determination to

KEEP US SHACKLED TO THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC EU

The final straw came when the arrogant Amber Rudd was restored to Government over the weekend and immediately demanded loyalty and unity around Mrs May's 'deal'.  Her commitment to 'loyalty' hasn't stopped her trashing Cabinet colleagues in the past.

This fanatically pro-EU women who oozes an inter-galactic sense of  entitledment from every pore, is the sister of the PR spiv Roland Rudd, who is paid a small fortune to run

PROJECT FEAR

on behalf of his well-healed clients.

Just imagine if one of Boris's siblings was cashing in on

BREXIT.

The calls from Remainers for the police to investigate would be deafening. By Sunday, I'd had enough and reached the point where I came over all Tom Robinson.

I've given up reading the papers,

I've given up watching TV.

 

LOOK, I repeat, for those of you who missed it the first time round, even tungsten-tipped hard Brexiteers like me accept there will have to be some concessions if we're going to escape from the EU straitjacket.

And I do think the prospect of a Marxist Corbynista government is too horrible to contemplate.

But I also believe its 1992 all over again. This is Mother Theresa's

BLACK WEDNESDAY

MOMENT

WHATEVER HAPPENS NEXT

THE TORIES

ARE SHOT TO PIECES.

All trust and confidence in them has drained away and we're looking at a Labour government by default whenever the next election is called

Most of the 17.4 million who believe they have been betrayed will simply stay at home, or drift back to Labour. Democracy will be the ultimate casualty of this shabby debacle.

The pathetic defeatest dog's breakfast of an agreement

 which Mother Theresa is trying to force down our throats isn't worthy of the description 'deal'.

It is a monstrous capitulation and will be etched on her political gravestone, even if she does manage to get it, or a version thereof, through Parliament.

Where do we go from here?

I haven't a clue.

But at least we now know exactly

what a

Very British Coup

LOOKS LIKE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 20,2018

H.F.1747

 

*
 

 

THE GUARDIAN

 
 

It's not Brexit Britain most likely to have a recession. It's Germany

Larry Elliott
If Europe’s biggest economy bumps into a slump then UK bargaining power may change
VW cars lined up for export at Bremerhaven pp

VW cars lined up for export at Bremerhaven. Photograph: Patrik Stollarz/AFP/Getty Images

 

Take Europe’s three biggest economies and list them in order of the likelihood of being in recession in the second half of 2018. Chances are Brexit-bound Britain would come first followed by France after its gilets jaunes protests. Germany would come last.

 

In fact, it is the eurozone’s locomotive economy that is at biggest risk of fulfilling the technical definition of recession – two consecutive quarters of falling output. After contracting by 0.2% in the third quarter, the latest news from Germany suggests it may have struggled to grow in the fourth quarter as well.

 

News that German industrial production fell by 1.9%

 

 in November came as a nasty shock. The stock response to the contraction in the third quarter was that it was due to the tightening up of European vehicle emission standards which led to one-off problems for its carmakers that would quickly be overcome.

 

While the bounce-back has been delayed rather than cancelled, Europe’s biggest economy faces significant headwinds. The growth spurt generated by monetary stimulus from the European Central Bank has run its course.

 

The European commission’s economic sentiment indicator fell in every single month of 2018 and in December declines in all four of the eurozone’s big four economies – Germany, France, Italy and Spain. As Andrew Kenningham of Capital Economics noted, the weakness cannot be put down to country-specific issues such as the gilets jaunes in France or sector-specific issues such as the disruption of the automotive sector.

world bank forecasts

 

To make matters worse for Germany, the global economy is also slowing, making it harder for companies to pick up new export orders. Protectionism is not helping either. Donald Trump sees China as his No1 trade target, but Germany – with its colossal current account surplus – comes a close second.

 

All of which brings a slightly different perspective to Britain’s debate about Brexit, which currently seems to be based on three key propositions: that continental Europe is thriving; that Europe’s politicians will come under no pressure to cut a deal from their big companies; and that Britain is well adrift at the bottom of Europe’s economic league table. All three are false.

 

It's not Brexit Britain most likely to have a recession. It's Germany

*

It's not Brexit Britain most likely to have a recession. It's Germany

 

TO REPEAT

It's not Brexit Britain most likely to have a recession. It's Germany

 

H.F.700/1

*
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 
 

 

WHO WILL SPEAK FOR

 ENGLAND

 

 DAILY MAIL COMMENT

 

PART 1

 

TODAY the Mail asks a question of profound significance to our destiny as a sovereign nation and the fate of our children and grandchildren.

Who will speak for England?

It's a question inspired  by one of the most dramatic moments in the history of Parliamentary democracy.

The date was September 2, 1939, the day after Hitler invaded Poland. Tory PM Neville Chamberlain had just made an ambivalent statement to the House.

On his backbenches, anti-appeasement stalwart Leo Amery was incensed. As Labour's deputy leader Arthur Greenwood rose to reply for the Opposition, the Tory MP bellowed across the floor:

SPEAK FOR ENGLAND

And Greenwood did just that, voicing anger over the premier's reluctance to honour Britain's treaty obligations to Poland.  Bowing to the mood of the House, Chamberlain

DECLARED WAR ON HITLER THE NEXT DAY.

Nobody is suggesting there are any parallels whatever between the

NAZIS AND THE EU

Indeed, the Mail would argue that one of the Union's great achievements, along with NATO, has been to foster peace in Europe.

[But as in 1939, we are at a crossroads in our island history. For in perhaps as little as 20 weeks 'time, voters will be asked to decide nothing less than what sort of country we want to live in and bequeath to those who come after us.

Are we to be a self-governing nation to control our borders, strike trade agreements with whomever we choose and

DISMISS OUR RULERS AND LAWMAKERS IF THEY DISPLEASE US?

Or will our LIBERTY-SECURITY and PROSPERITY be better assured by submitting to a

STATIST-UNELECTED-BUREAUCRACY IN BRUSSELS

accepting the will of

UNACCOUNTABLE JUDGES

and linking

OUR DESTINY

with that of a sclerotic Europe that tries to achieve the impossible by uniting countries as diverse as

 GERMANY and GREECE.

For make no mistake. After the failure of Mr Cameron's renegotiations-and this week's draft deal shows there's no other word for it than

FAILURE,

since it changes

NOTHING

of any substance in our relationship with the EU

-this is the stark choice facing us in the coming REFERENDUM

For months, we have been bombarded with propaganda from one side: the side that speaks for

BRUSSELS.

In a brilliantly organised campaign,

BIG BUSINESS

UNIVERSITIES

'ELDER STATESMEN'

and the

CIVIL SERVICE

under the direction of its head,

Sir Cover-up' Jeremy Heywood-have been corralled into making the case that it would be a catastrophe if

BRITAIN left the EU.

Needless to say, their apocalyptic interventions have been zealously reported by the supposedly neutral BBC, that former champion of the disastrous EURO, which struggles for the

'OUT' camp

Meanwhile, the Conservative Party has thrown off all pretence of impartiality, proselytising for the EU in defiance of most of its rank-and-file members, who have grave doubts about Brussels.

More shamefully still, Eurosceptic ministers have been muzzled-banned from speaking on the most momentous issue of our time, even now that we know the [pathetic] terms Mr [Neville] Cameron is willing to accept'

As we report today, an edict has even gone out requiring all Cabinet ministers to filter their statements and quotes on Europe through Downing Street.

So we ask again: who will speak for England( and of course by

'England'

like Amery in 1939, we mean the whole of the United Kingdom)?

Full Article

 DAILY MAIL COMMENT

FOLLOW ON

PART 2

 

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: At last, we have voices to speak for

 ENGLAND

Earlier this month, the Mail asked on our front page:

 

 ENGLAND

 

FEBRUARY 22-2016

WHO WILL SPEAK FOR

 

    Daily Mail

     

     

     

     

    THE DOMINIC LAWSON

     

    COLUMN

     

     

     Cameron and the lie that's festered .for 45 years.

     

    HOW THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND WERE BETRAYED IN 1972 AND 1975-AND THE

     CON PARTY

    ARE STILL LYING IN 2016

     

    As Mr  Lawson has stated so aptly:

     

    YOUR VOTE TO LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC EU

    is to become once more a

    FREE SELF-GOVERNING COUNTRY

    and to ask the

     

    OTHERSIDE

     

    WHY ARE YOU AGAINST 

     

    'SELF GOVERNING  DEMOCRACY'

     

    YES, WHY ARE THEY?

    *

    [The LEAVE the EU Camp

    have not forgotten their world renowned inheritance of PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY of over 700 years in the making and known in the British Commonwealth and across the pond and wherever Habeus Corpus and Trial by Jury Justice is upheld as the

     

    'Rights and Liberties

     

     

    of

     

     

     

     Englishmen.']

     

     

     

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    .FEBRUARY 22-2016 -

     

 

*   *   *

[

[Does not the behaviour by HERR Cameron and his hiring's  supposed democrats strike one as reminiscent of the early years of Adolf Hitler which led up to the formation of the Nazi SS. Once all views are subject to censorship under the present circumstances then we are no longer a true DEMOCRACY. As Plato states: 'Democracy passes into DESPOTISM' and the details mentioned above confirm such a declaration and all this has been brought about because since  the 1688 Revolution there has been the stark failure to heed Oliver Cromwell's clarion call for the  constitutional protection of the 

SACRED FUNDAMENTALS

OF

THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.]

PART 2-TO FOLLOW SHORTLY

*
ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

 

In 1962,

 Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality 

 HITLER'S plan for Europe

 under

 

GERMAN CONTROL.

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

FEBRUARY 4- 2016

H. F .700

 

 

Revealed:

The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich ...in the EU

*

 

By Adam Lebor
Last updated at 10:30 PM on 09th May 2009

 

 

The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for 's post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis' return to power and work for a 'strong German empire'. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

 

Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with I. G. Farben

Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben

The three-page, closely typed report, marked 'Secret', copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany's economy by sending money through Switzerland.

They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire - but not just German.

The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.

The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of . The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War.

But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact.

Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.

Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?

The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 - and it paints an extraordinary picture.

The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.

 

Auschwitz

Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a factory run by German firm I. G. Farben

There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. 'It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.' Such defeatist talk was treasonous - enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo's cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.

But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to 'make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion'.

The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.

They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company.

But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.

Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich.

In stage one, the industrialists were to 'prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis', using the term for the French resistance.

Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a 'secure post-war foundation in foreign countries', while 'existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat'.

In stage three, German businesses would set up a 'sleeper' network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power.

'The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,' Bosse announced.

'Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.'

 

Enlarge   The 1944 Red House Report

Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing 'plans of German industrialists to engage in underground activity'

The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission.

The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.

Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.

Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence.

The Red House Report's author notes: 'Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence.

'Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party's plans for its post-war operations.'

The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter.

More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.

During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it.

A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.

He says: 'By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.'

Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.

As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.

A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad's gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility.

By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf's ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS's massive pan-European economic empire after Germany's defeat.

Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the transition to a post-war economy after Germany's defeat. This was dangerous, especially as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups.

But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service, protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS.

Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS's economic empire almost worthless.

The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to introduce a currency that would have any value.

That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency, Germany was once again an attractive trading partner.

The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires across Europe.

War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 - despite six years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments - the capital stock of assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the armaments boom.

Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered European continent. The answer was through supranationalism - the voluntary surrender of national sovereignty to an international body.

Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today.

But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists convicted of war crimes.

The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years.

Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death.

The Krupp company soon became one of Europe's leading industrial combines.

The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a fortune of more than $1billion, the equivalent of £400million at the time.

'For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,' says historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers.

'The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.'

Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the V1 rocket.

Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with the SS officers overseeing the camps.

Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany's most powerful banker, had prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of Deutsche Bank, Germany's biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded, Deutsche Bank enthusiastically 'Aryanised' Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were owned by Jews.

By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche Bank's wealth had quadrupled.

Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, as Deutsche Bank's representative. I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany's most powerful companies, formed out of a union of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties.

It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other prisoners died producing artificial rubber.

When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis' chilling term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent for which was owned by I.G. Farben.

But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben's bosses hedged their bets.

During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard's research. After the war, 24 I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III - but only twelve of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder.

Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany's post-war reconstruction. It was largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a 'strong German empire' was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today's European Union.

Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid - reconstruction funds - to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany's economic recovery.

Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.

Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are strikingly familiar today - on monetary integration and common transport, energy and welfare systems.

When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs was his most important financial adviser.

Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer.

That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and European Commission.

Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard Germany's first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as Chancellor for three years.

But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe - was built on mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by German companies in the Nazi era was

 2,700,000.

Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry.

A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer 5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any further legal action.

To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of £1.8billion.

Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory.

But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief, once said: 'In 50 years' time nobody will think of nation states.'

For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today's drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich - an economic rather than military imperium.

• The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor's thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is published by Reportage Press.

 

Places:

,

Print this article Print this article

Read later Read later

Email to a friend Email to a friend

 

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

 

*

[ Prime Minister Edward Heath was a NAZI SPY for over 60 years to his death in 2005 before which he publicly admitted that he had lied to the people when he said there would be no loss of sovereignty. His fellow traitors were Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon who were reported to MI5 in 1938 by the Master Lindsay of Balliol College Oxford . Harold MacMillian before him was exposed by intelligence sources 13 years earlier in 1957 as an agent of the German Abwehr.     

This country has been served by many traitors since that day as a look at the list of members of the

and that is not a complete list because of the great difficulty of obtaining the names of those who belong to such a secretive body.  But we know that Gordon Brown- Ed Balls on the Labour side and Kenneth Clarke and George Osborne the Shadow Chancellor on the Tory side. The Liberal Democrats have their David Steel and no doubt many others. The Governor of the Bank of England Mervyn King is also on the list and this man has charge of our of the future financial  health of our nation. And we must not forget our greatest despot Tony Blair.

www.worldreports.org.uk

[We have hundreds of Bulletins on the European Union listed below

*

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

 

H.F.1290

 

[THE GREAT BETRAYAL]

*

BRITAIN AND EUROPE

The Culture of Deceit

by

Christopher Booker

 

*

PART  4

MRS THATCHER and 1985

[The Great Conspiracy]

Ten years later, when Britain's economy  had begun to make historic recovery which had nothing directly to do with being part of 'Europe' It was Mrs Thatcher curiously enough who was put in the position of the British people, in believing that the Common market's chief purpose was to promote and liberate trade. It was this which led her to fall  for the proposal that there should now be a further big push to turn it into something more like a genuine free-trading area.

Since, as she imagined, this was the Common Market's real aim it could surely be achieved without any need for another treaty. But at the Milan summit in May 1985 she was rudely disabused. The powerful new troika at the head of what had become 'the European Community'. President Mitterand, Chancellor Kohl and Jacques Delors, now President of the Commission, were keen to see another major leap forward to European integration. With  the aid of the Italian Prime Minister, they set a clever ambush, insisting that what she was after could be achieved by only a new treaty, and calling a snap vote.  The reason they wanted this was because it could give Brussels a raft of new centralising powers not allowed in the original treaty, significantly extending both the areas of lawmaking to be handed over to Brussels and restrictions on national veto powers.

By the end of the year their treaty had been already signed and they had got all they wanted.

Mrs Thatcher had been hoodwinked

And to disguise her frustration, she now felt she had to sell the Single European Act back home as if its main purpose really had been just to set up a

'SINGLE MARKET',

as she had told everyone, rather than move towards a 'SINGLE EUROPE' as its name implied. This confusion, alas, only helped to compound the deceit of her predecessors.

In fact one of the significant points agreed at that same Milan summit had been the adoption of a document known as the Addenino Report, which in its own way was to do as much for European integration as any of the treaties. Pietro Addenino was an Italian MEP who had been commissioned after the so-called "Solemn Declaration on European Union" at Stuttgart in 1983, to draw up a whole range of measures specifically designed to create what was called

"A EUROPEAN IDENTITY".

These included giving the Community its own emblem and flag, the "ring of stars" and its anthem, Beethoven's "Ode To joy2, all of which were ceremonially unveiled. Other recommendations ranged from adopting a Community driving licence to sponsoring its own sports teams and cultural organisations. These were deliberately intended to give 'Europe' the symbolic appurtenances of a

NATION STATE

through at that Milan summit by a roomful of people including Margaret Thatcher, whose officials, one may suspect, had no more given her a proper briefing on the real intentions of the Addenino Report than they had on the

SINGLE EUROPEAN ACT.

But it was Mrs Thatcher's growing alarm at just how far and how fast the integrationist tide was now running which led her in 1988 to give that Cassandra-like warning speech in whose memory the Bruges Group was founded. Mr Delors was now speaking openly of how the President and his Commission would soon be the new

"GOVERNMENT of EUROPE"

the

Council of Ministers - its "SENATE",

the

 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

its

"HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES"

which within ten years would be enacting

80 percent

of

EUROPE'S LEGISLATION:

to all of which in

1989

Mrs Thatcher famously responded.

"no, no. no".

Only a year later she was bundled out of the way, soon after she had in effect been blackmailed by her Chancellor Nigel Lawson and her Foreign Secretary Geoffrey Howe into accepting Britain's catastrophic entry into the ERM. This of course involved precisely that freezing of exchange  rates which the British People had been promised in the 1975 referendum would never happen. We  then saw Mrs Thatcher's successor going off to Maastricht to face another treaty which was now quite unashamedly designed to transform the

EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

by another giant step into the

EUROPEAN UNION.

*

100 REASONS  TO LEAVE THE EU

*

.H.F.1265 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

 

A REMINDER!-IF YOU NEED IT!

101 REASONS FOR LEAVING THE EU

 

PART 1

 

We wish to express our indebtedness and gratitude to those who in books and articles have sought to alert the Nation to its Danger, and whose observations are reflected or summarised here: in particular,

 

Rodney Atkinson and Norris McWhirter

for Treason at Maastricht

 

Adrian Hilton for The Principality and Power of Europe

 

Lindsay Jenkins for The Last Days of Britain

And

 

For the late Lord Shore of Stepney’s

Separate Ways

 

Copies of this booklet can be obtained from the Publishers -Priced £1.20 incl p&p

 

St Mathew Publishing Ltd

24 Geldart St.

Cambridge

Tel: 01223 504871 Fax: 01223 512304

 

*

 

1. hush up

 

Cabinet papers pre - 1970 show the Heath government to have had full knowledge of the EEC being a long -term plan for the unitary European State with its own Currency; but the facts were suppressed by this and succeeding governments with the Deliberate intention of keeping the Nation in the dark

 

1.         ‘surrenders of sovereignty’’

 

On 14th December 1960 the Lord Chancellor,

Lord Kilmuir,

Britain’s senior legal officer, warned Edward Heath of the implications of signing the Treaty of Rome:

‘’ To satisfy the requirements of the treaty, Parliament could enact legislation which would give automatic force of Law to any existing or future regulations made by… the Community…It is clear that the Council of Ministers could make regulations which would be binding on us even against our wishes… It is the first step on the road, which leads… to the federal state… I must emphasise that in my view the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serious ones…these objections ought to be brought out into the open.

 

2.         ‘end of Britain’’

 

That the consequences of membership had been realised by some at Westminster about this time is apparent from a speech in 1962 by Hugh Gaitskell, leader of the Labour party, who rightly identifying ‘’ the desire of those, who created the European Community, for a political federation. That is what they mean, that is what they offer’’, added that this would bring about the end of Britain as an independent [Nation State]…the end of a thousand years of history.

 

3.         the big lie

 

Edward Heath’s 1971 White Paper on joining the EEC deceived Parliament and the People with its false statements that’’ there is no question of any erosion of essential sovereignty’’, and that Britain’s Sovereignty would somehow be ‘’enlarged’’ by ‘sharing’’

 

4.         ministry of propaganda

 

Between 1970 and 1972 the Heath Government directed a secret propaganda offensive, known as the Connaught Breakfasts, in which Cabinet Ministers, Foreign Heads of Department, civil servants, media managers and journalists, in conjunction with the European Movement, carried on TV, radio and newspaper campaign to swing round strongly opposed public opinion to acceptance of the EEC, public money being used in the process.

 

5.         unconstitutional…1

 

The 1972 Act which took Britain into the EEC was in breach of the Constitution, in that the Government allowed no prior consultation of the electorate by special General Election or Referendum, as is required under the Constitution for Parliamentary measures involving Constitutional Change, the precedents being those of 1831/2 and 1910.

 

 

7. unconstitutional…2

 

By passing the 1972 European Communities Act, Parliament unconstitutionally attempted to renounce its legal Sovereignty, so as to make the British People subject to enactments of outside agencies, and ending its own ability to put into effect the expressed wishes of the Electorate.

 

8. unconstitutional…3

 

In doing so, it deliberately and wrongfully denied the, ultimate Sovereignty of the People, of which Parliament is Constitutionally both Servant and Defender and which at the end of each Parliament’s term is returned to its Possessors.

 

9.                     unconstitutional…4

 

It is the Corner Stone of the Constitution that no Parliament is or can be bound by enactments of its predecessors; but the Act of 1972 unconstitutionally purported (Section 2.4) to be mandatory upon all succeeding Parliaments.

   

10.               unconstitutional…5

  

The Act of 1972 is unconstitutional in the wider respect that falsehood and deception was employed to secure its enactment, contrary not only to the spirit of the Constitution but of all procedure whatsoever.

 

11. test case

 

The Metric Martyrs’ appeal against their conviction is based on the fact that the 1985 Imperial Weights &Measures Act, which permits trading in pounds and ounces, constitutionally takes precedence over the earlier Act of 1972 which made us members of the EU; and it is thus a test case not only between British and EU law, but of whether the 1972 Act can have abrogated the Constitution.

 

12.indestructible

 

Any supposition that the Act in some sense annulled the Constitution is untenable, since (apart from the 1972 Act itself being unconstitutional both in its content and process of enactment) the unique unwritten British Constitution is not law, but essentially an honoured undertaking and consensus in those who have created and live under it as to the proper conduct of Parliamentary affairs, and thus incapable of being set aside by legal means.

 

13. … twilight hour?

 

By subjecting the British people to decrees other than the laws enacted by their own legislature, the Act contravened the undertaking in the Coronation Oath ‘’ to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom according to their laws and customs’’; the provisions of the treason Act 1795, against engaging in actions ‘’tending to the overthrow of the laws, government and happy constitution’’ of the United Kingdom, and those of the Treason Felony Act of 1848 condemning ant who attempt to ‘’ deprive or depose our most gracious Lady the Queen from the style, honour or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom’’; and the Privy Councillor's Oath ‘’ To bear faith and allegiance to the Crown and defend its jurisdiction and power against all foreign…persons…or states.’’

 

14. royal commoner

 

Allegiance to H.M. the Queen is in effect allegiance to Brussels, since through the Queen’s EU citizenship and accountability in her own courts to superior EU law, Her Majesty has vassal status, and an Oath of Allegiance to her now stands’ subject to the Commission’s tolerance’’ so long as she and her Nation do not show themselves disloyal to the sovereignty of the European Union.

 

 

15. unconstitutionality

 

The chief reason for the Labour government’s calling a Referendum in 1975 was the unconstitutionality of the European Communities

 

16. bizarre

A retrospective Referendum upon an Act of Parliament was without precedent in British history, and partook of the nature of inertia salesmanship, especially since accompanied by the dispatching of government literature to every household with the disinformation that the Act had been purely a free trade agreement, and urging a ‘Yes’ vote; a species of official activity also without precedent, and just as questionable.

 

17. the great divide

Britain’s becoming and remaining a member of the EU, and the methods employed to his end, resulted from the emergence of what Lord Goodhart memorably described as ‘’ a political establishment’’ with purposes disturbingly opposed to the wish of the electorate; his book ‘Full-Hearted Consent (1976) ironically gaining its title from Mr Heath’s assurance during the 1970 General Election campaign that, if there were a future possibility of entering the EEC, no government would take their nation into it’’ without the full-hearted consent of Parliament and the People.

 

18. vote as EU please

 

The political establishment’s continuing activities have brought about a new situation, new to British politics, in which the widespread public hostility to the EU’s increasing encroachments is denied party political expression, the policies of the major parties all being favourable to membership.

 

19. polling days

 

In a nationwide MORI opinion poll carried out on behalf of the British Democracy Campaign 15-21 March, 2001, in which 1805 adult respondents were questioned face to face in their homes, 52% of these offered an opinion declared themselves in favour of leaving the EU now, 71% wanted a Referendum on continued membership, and 75% considered that the British people had not received sufficient information on the implications of the EU.

 

20. mobile goalposts

 

Through the deeper irregularity of its plan to proceed by stealth through a series of treaties until the European State was a fait accompli before its populations had come to realise what was going on, the EU has developed into a concept and institution far other than what was voted on in 1975 Referendum, and so without democratic validation in this as in other countries.

 

 

21. undemocratic

 

The European Union is an unrepresentative and authoritarian institution, by virtue of the fact that the members of the legislative (Council of Ministers) and its executive (Commission) are not directly elected by and responsible to the voters of a EU constituency.

 

22. non-accountable

 

The EU Council of Ministers is composed of the non-dismissible nominees of the governments of member states, who are thus removed from democratic accountability.

 

23. horse-trading

 

Britain’s voice in the Council is one amongst many; and policy decisions, as the outcome of conflict of interests and pressures resolved by bargaining, by no means necessarily correspond to Britain’s needs and the wishes of its electorate.

 

24. cabal

 

The Council, more strictly the legislative body, and the Commission, which with its executive roll also issues legislative proposals, both meet in secret; and since the fifty or so persons who compose the two have not been elected to European government functions, and in carrying them out are accountable to no-one, they constitutes, not a legislative, but a ruling oligarchy.

 

25. big brothers

 

Though the EU Commission are unelected appointees without democratic mandate or accountability, they have power to impose directives and regulations by by-passing the legislatures of democratic states.

 

26. the parliament: authority

 

Whereas the British Cabinet is constitutionally answerable to Parliament in Westminster, where a government defeat on a motion of no confidence involves a Dissolution and General Election, the European Union’s Parliament, so called, is entirely without such control over the Commission, which is effectively the EU Cabinet.

 

27. the parliament: finance

 

From its earlier days to the present, what has been confirmed the Westminster Parliament’s power has been its direction of finance; but the EU Parliament is without a corresponding capacity?

 

28. the parliament: legislation

 

Unlike all the other parliaments in the Western tradition, the EU Parliament is unable to legislate, its functions being merely to review and agree measures drawn up by the Commission, and thereby to have virtually no legislative role.

 

29 the parliament veto

 

Nor does the Parliament have a final veto over Commission regulations and directives, since through the procedure euphemistically named ‘’Conciliation’’, the Commission can at its will override any negative vote.

 

30. façade

 

The word ‘’Parliament’’ is thus a misnomer for what is little more than a rubber-stamp or puppet agency; but the democratic election of its members creates the dangerous illusion of democracy being at work, in what is in essence an authoritarian regime.

 

31.      inferior government

 

Through its membership of the EU, Britain is being subjected to a species of non-representative, non-democratic, authoritarian government far inferior to that which prevailed at Westminster until 1973, and having features reminiscent of the dictatorial systems which flourished on the continent of Europe in the not very distant past.

 

32.      12-star chamber?

 

The European Court of Justice, whose members are appointed by the various governments, is the supreme arbiter on EU law, with power to overrule the laws of member states; but being charged under the Treaty of Rome with ensuring that provisions of all the EU treaties, and the principle of ‘’ever closer union’’, are observed, and in its own words devoted to ‘’overcoming the resistance of national governments to European integration’’, it is politically predisposed and active in a manner incompatible with judicial impartiality.

 

33.      moot points

 

EU treaties and regulations are generally cast in such obscure language that all wishing to be sure where they stand will be forced to go to the European Court of Justice: so that it will become an absolute source of political authority, and the European State be unassailably dominant over the former nations now its provinces.

 

34.      EU rules OK

 

EU law, as conveyed by the treaties, regulations and directives, and decrees and rulings of the European Court, are accepted by British courts as taking precedence over national law, the ECJ having declared that ‘’Every national court must apply Community law in its entirety and must accordingly set aside any provision of national law which may conflict with it, whether prior or subsequent to this Community rule’’ (ECR 629 at 643,644).

 

35.      ‘’tidal wave’’

 

The result is that the British Statute and Common law are being superseded, and law-making has become primarily the prerogative of the European Union, which has been described by a British judge as ‘’a bold new source of law’’, and whose legislation, according to the late Lord Denning, a former Master of the Rolls, is no longer’’ an incoming tide flowing up the estuaries of England’’, but’’ now like a tidal wave bringing down sea walls and flowing inland over our fields and houses, to the dismay of us all’’ (quoted in the Times, 1st April 1996).

 

 

 

36. corpus juris

 

In place of existing laws in the member countries, there will have been instituted under the European State the Corpus Juris, a body of law largely in accordance with continental legal systems, deriving from three main sources: the Corpus Juris Civilis of the Roman Emperor Justinian, Inquisition law, and the Code Napoleon

 

37. euro state prosecutor

 

Corpus Juris is to be administered by the European State Prosecutor, and operate through European courts and trans-national police and the courts and police forces of member states, so combining police and prosecution into one entity

 

38. continental menu

 

Judicial procedure is to be as already in practice on the Continent, the European State Prosecutor having responsibility for investigation, arrest, committal to trial, presentation of the prosecution case in court, judgment and imposition of sentence, trial taking place before an inquisitorial judge and two professional assessors: the State, in effect, both judge and jury.

 

39. … innocent? Prove it!

 

Also as on the Continent, the concept of presumed innocence will disappear, and it will become the responsibility of the accused to prove his innocence to the court, contrary to the position under English law, where the burden of proof rests with the prosecution, and the accused is innocent unless and until proved guilty.

 

40.                   goodbye, Habeas Corpus

 

Corpus Juris will quash the right of Habeas Corpus, instituted in 1215 by Magna Carta  (article 39), by which it is granted in perpetuity to all subjects of the monarch that no-one should suffer the loss of liberty without evidence warranting his further detention being established in a court hearing, normally within 48 hours of his arrest.

 

41. farewell, trial by jury

 

Corpus Juris will similarly abolish the right of trial by jury, whose beginnings date from as early as 1166 in the reign of Henry 11, through which the question of a person’s innocence or guilt is determined by twelve of his peers, not by the judiciary, a practice which, because of a jury’s freedom to acquit a person technically guilty under an unjust decree, ensures that laws made by the state are always acceptable to the people, and that government pressure upon, or corruption of, the judiciary shall never be able to affect the impartial administration of justice.

 

42. ‘ the test of civilisation’’

 

In a Minute to the Home Secretary of 21st November, 1943, Winston Churchill observed: ‘’The great principles of Habeas Corpus and trial by jury… are the supreme protection invented by the British people for ordinary individuals against the State… The power of the executive to cast a man in prison without formulating any charge known to law for an indefinite period, is in the highest decree odious, and is the foundation for all totalitarian governments… Nothing can be more abhorrent to democracy. This is really the test of civilisation.’’

 

 

* * *

 

 

43. above the law

 

The European State’s judicial system involves the introduction of forces of armed police, whether members of Europol or of the paramilitary European border police in process of formation, enjoying diplomatic immunity from arrest, and thus above the law; unlike British police, who, while charged with enforcement of the, remain ordinary members of the public, themselves subject to the laws they uphold

 

44. clear enough

 

The reasons for the European State police’s immunity from the law have never been explained, though the parallel with the police forces of authoritarian regimes is manifest

 

45. just the start

 

Eurojust, the provisional EU public prosecution agency, which is closely linked to Europol, already has autonomous, non-accountable power to initiate investigations in every state of the European Union, Europol being able to order surveillance of any British person by letters, E-mail or ‘phone tapping, and to acquire upon demand secret intelligence from British security agencies M15 and M16.

 

46. affront

 

The concepts, provisions and methods of the judicial system of the emerging European State are legally and ethically inferior to the system of British justice admired throughout the world for its humanity and impartiality: and if ever instituted in Britain, would be a regressive and affronting imposition.

 

47. Euro Army

 

The future of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), founded upon the predominant military power of the United States, which has for more than half a century secured and maintained Europe’s peace, is now threatened by the European State’s establishing an Army of its own, dubbed the Rapid Reaction Force, upon the pretext that it will facilitate military operations in which NATO does not wish to take part.

48. pretext

 

Since arrangements already exist within NATO for the EU to take military action without NATO’s participation, but using its facilities, assets, transport and intelligence, the reasons for setting up a European Army can only be to confirm the emerging Statehood of the EU, and lessen the commitment of the United States to Europe’s security: so jeopardising NATO’s continuing role, and thereby the peace of Europe.

 

 

49. escape of cat

 

Helmut Kohl’s statement that ‘’ a united Europe without a common defence is, in the long run, not feasible’’ (Independence, CIB, January 2000,p1) would seem to apply regarding the first; and that of Jacques Chirac, ‘’The object of a European defence identity is to contain the United States’’ (cited by Michael Fabricant, MP, House of Commons, 29th March 2000), with respect to the second.

* *

 

DESPOTISM is:

 

[‘ Everything by the EU- but nothing by YOU ’]

 * * *

 (50 - More Reasons in Part 2.)

 Or you may order a booklet from:

 

St Mathew Publishing Ltd

24 Geldart St. Cambridge

CB1 2lX

 

Tel: 01223 504871 or Fax: 01223 512304

2004

CLICK FOR PART 2

 

H.F.1288-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT!

 
LITTLEJOHN

 

The Living Dead

AND

The Joy of Brexit

DAILY MAIL- RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: The Joy of

Brexit

 

NOVEMBER 13,2018

 

JUST when you thought the Brexit debacle couldn't get any worse, the crypt door creaks open and out crawls Gordon Brown to give us the benefit of his wisdom.

Looking like an extra from a George Romero zombie movie, Gordon Brown became the latest member of the Living Dead to demand a second referendum.

His two immediate predecessors, Tony Blair and Johnny Major are already doing their damnest to overturn the clearly expressed will of

17.4 MILLION PEOPLE

who voted unequivocally

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION.

I think we can safely ignore Gordon's view on

DEMOCRACY.

After losing the 2010 General Election, managing to harvest 29 per cent of votes cast, he tried to hang on by what remained of his fingernails and had to be dragged out of Downing Street four days later.

HE WAS THE MAN WHO SIGNED THE LISBON TREATY IN SECRET,

sneaking in through the tradesmen's entrance to avoid photographers.

You may vaguely recall that Blair and Brown gave a solemn promise to hold a referendum on Lisbon and then cynically reneged on it. Major forced the Maastricht Treaty through the Commons, in the teeth of fierce opposition, and consigned the Conservative Party to

13 years in the wilderness.

Gordon's solution to heal the divisions which could only be exacerbated still further would be to establish a new Royal Commission to 'engage and listen' to voters views.

Brilliant.

That's exactly what millions of us had in mind when we voted in 2016.

What Do We Want?

Royal Commission!

When Do We Want It?

Now!

Anyway, what's wrong with simple accepting the outcome of the biggest single democratic exercise in

BRITISH HISTORY.

The only reason we have bitter divisions in some sections of society is that

well-funded fanatical Remainers refuse to acknowledge the result of the first

'PEOPLE'S VOTE'

and are determined

TO REVERSE IT.

Sadly this poisonous cohort contains three of our four former PM's.

To Call Me Dave's credit, he has maintained a dignified distance from the self-styled resistance to Brexit.

But what is it about certain ex-prime ministers that persuades them they immediately become sagacious statesman the moment they leave office, regardless of the mess they left behind?

Why do they think they can completely disregard the wishes of those who once voted for them and kept them in the manner to which they always  felt entitled?

Of course, all Prime Ministers eventually go mad. It just takes some a little longer than others.

IN the case of Theresa May, who is still there (for now), she has already managed to convince herself that she is the only person with the wit, imagination and ability to decide what comprises a successful

BREXIT

The sad fact is that she possesses precisely none of those qualities. As a direct result of her fatal combination of stubborness and stupidity, she has achieved the feat of joining the ranks of the

LIVING DEAD

while still in the job.

[The crisis on our streets has been brought about by Theresa May when Home Secretary when she upset the POLICE FEDERATION and she undoubtedly holds a grudge because it is lack of FINANCE that has seen the virtual disappearance of the Bobbie-on-the Beat and closure of POLICE STATIONS and the 'Wild West' anarchy on our streets.]

 

On the other hand, I suppose it takes a special kind of genius to alienate

EVERYBODY

-Leaver. Remainers, the EU Commission, the DUP-YOU NAME IT.

 

When you manage to upset both sides of the Johnson family, you're in big trouble. As I wrote back at the time of Chequers sell-out in July, she's hopelessly bungled the negotiations and is prepared to reduce Britain to

serf status

in her desperation to

SEAL A DEAL:

'Independent sovereign nations do not accept the jurisdiction of unelected foreign judges. Independent sovereign nations do not swallow wholesale rules made by unaccountable foreign bureaucrats. Independent sovereign nations are at liberty to conclude free trade deals with any country in the world.'

 

And for this she wants to bung Brussels

£39BILLION

OF OUR MONEY

Since Chequers, it's got even worse. No wonder even Remainers like Jo Johnson despair.

About the only sensible thing Gordon Brown said yesterday was that we can still go back to the EU and tell them the deal on the table won't wash - despite the fact that Brussels hasn't even agreed to that.

They think Mother Theresa is so feeble that they have been emboldened to demand continued access to Britain's fishing waters. That would be the ultimate humiliation among many. Grocer Heath gave up our traditional fishing waters to get us in to the EU. Now Mrs May could give them away again so we can 'LEAVE'.

 

YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP.

But Gordon's right. We can go back and renegotiate. Just not with the dismal, defeatist Theresa in charge

She should have the decency to resign in July, when it was clear the game was up

The only way forward is for her to fall off her kittren heels, sooner than later. After two wasted years of dissembling, betrayal, incompetance and downright surrender to Brussels, Mother Theresa deserves nothing less than an ignominious departure.

If the Conservative Party can rediscover some backbone and sense of self-preservation they can get rid of her tomorrow without having to trigger a protracted leadership contest, provided they agree on a single compromise candidate.

Who would replace her? Does it really matter? Years ago, when there was talk of a stalking horse candidate standing against Johnny Major, I reakoned a real horse could beat him.

So I invited readers to vote for either Major or Red Rum as Prime Minister. Red Rum romped home by a margin of

9-1

The talk in some quarters is that Home Secretary Sajid Javid might be the right fit. He is bright, has a compelling backstory and although he sided with Remain during the referendum, is not a committed EU federalist.

On the downside, when it comes to inspirational public speaking, he has all the charisma of Albert RN,

But beggars can't be choosers. And we can't go on as we are

Even diehard 'no deal'  Brexiteers like me have to accept, as Mick Jagger said, that you can't always get what you want.

The best we can probably hope for at this late stage is a

Norway For Now Deal;

which would get us out of the EU with no barriers to frictionless trade. It wouldn't be ideal but we could try to pick the bones out of it later.

 

Unless the Tories can pull a relatively cheap Brexit out of the fire, they will forfeit all trust and credibility and we will be staring down the barrel of a Corbyn government by default.

 

 

In a just universe, Labour shouldn't benefit from the Tory disarray. They're all over the place, too, and will vote down any deal put before Parliament because they want to force a General Election.

 

The Conservatives may be  what Terry-Thomas would have called a 'absolute shower', but do really want to live in a country with Corbyn in No 10, Mr McDonnell running the Treasury and Diane Abbott in charge of immigration and the Old Bill?

As FOR the Liberals, at least they managed to provide us with a little light relief.

Not only has 82-year old Lord Lester been suspended from the House for offering to make a women a baroness if she agreed to become his mistress - an allegation that he says is 'completely untrue'.

We also learn that 'one of their senior advisers has fallen foul of the #MeToo madness.

Apparently, he propositioned a female colleague after inviting her to dinner to discuss his party's 'Brexit position'.

Ding, dong!

I've heard of the missionary position but the Brexit position is a new one on me.

In case you're wondering exactly what her idea of the Brexit position, its like this:

Shackled together, facing both ways at once, with little prospect of an early withdrawal.

*  *  *

 

NOVEMBER 13,2018

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS-CHANGES OF FORM- ARE OURS]

 
 

STATEMENT

[Mr Richard Littlejohn has drawn an impressive  and positive picture of the present political scene which will be looked on as one of the most important epochs in the history of our island home.

 How a once FREE DEMOCRACY was SOLD out to a FOREIGN POWER and hindered in its RETRIEVAL by its ELECTED CHAMBER shows how the PEOPLE failed to heed the message of HISTORY that unless VIGILANCE is KEPT then THEIR FREEDOM is at RISK..

Over the past DECADES many PATRIOTS have WARNED of the CONSEQUENCES of the NEGLECT of our WORLD-PRIZED ANCIENT PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY an INHERITANCE in TRUST for FUTURE GENERATIONS.. THE FUTURE IS UNCERTAIN because TRAITORS within our ELECTED CHAMBER are in the ENEMIES CAMP of TWO BLOODY WORLD WARS  GERMANY because the EU was the BRAINCHILD of ADOLF HITLER.

 WHEN we are AGAIN a FREE NATION STATE our CONSTITUTION should be AMENDED to PREVENT ever AGAIN our NATION STATE of ENGLAND being a SUBJECT STATE of another POWER by the EMBEDEDMENT of OUR FREEDOM in the CONSTITUTION OF OUR COUNTRY. THe LAW of TREASON should be updated to ensure that any future individuals are punished ,who plot to undermine the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

of

ENGLISHMEN. "]

the very foundation of many constitutions the world over.

'...The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their own rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no  shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.  It may be very wrong to say that the forms of Government are of no importance and that the best system is the one best administered.  But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of FREE INSTITUTIONS is their enabling men to obtain a wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those who live under it to WATCH the CONDUCT of their RULERS, aiding them when RIGHT, checking them when they are WRONG; and above all, that no Constitution however excellent, can supersede the NECESSITY or DISPENCE with the DUTY of this CONSTANT VIGILANCE.' [Caps are Ours]

 by HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM FRS-LONDON-1844

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 13-2018

 

 

H.F.1759

 

 

*  *  *

A REMINDER TO THOSE WHO STILL KOW-TOW TO

 BRUSSELS AND BERLIN

 

'...We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you.'

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

 EDMUND BURKE

 Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 *

1+2

 

 

 The

 I was accused of being racist, I knew political correctness had gone MAD

 

 

Political correctness had gone mad, writes TREVOR ... - Daily Mail

 
 

EXTRACT

A FEW weeks ago I observed that Barack Obama's iconic status as the first African-American US President should not obscure his mixed political record

For that, I was accused by one Radio 4 commentator of peddling a 'racist narrative

As a black man and former chairman of the

EQUALITY and HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

you might think I would be surprised to face a charge of

RACISM

but I was not.

For at a time when this country is crying out for frank discussion on issues such as race and sexuality, debate is being closed down because those who find offence in everything cry

RACIST or SEXIST.

The result - as I argue tonight in a TV programe -is that our

POLITICAL and CULTURAL ELITE

 seem unable to speak plainly about things that concern many citizens .

While our rulers seem to have all the time in the world to debate who should use the lavatory (in deference to the transgender lobby), they dismiss anxieties about

OVERCROWDED SCHOOLS

 DOCTORS SURGERIES

as merely a bigoted dislike of migrants.

HOW HAS THIS COME ABOUT?

[To follow]

Hounded...

Tyranny...

Hapless...

 

 

 

 

Full article

 

Multiculturalism is no longer right for Britain

[Mr Phillips has known for many years that MULTICULTURALISM WAS NEVER RIGHT FOR BRITAIN and in fact NOT  RIGHT

ANYWHERE.]

 

 

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

('the creation of a common mind') is a Soviet concept: 'Political correctness' means the exact reverse of what it says: It means that lies, or an 'imposed truth', supplant the objective truth' the exact reverse of what it says: it means that lies, or an 'imposed truth' supplant the objective truth. 'Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism' states, in an essay entitled 'Marxism-Leninism as a Philosophy and a WorldOutlook', that'...in deciding other affairs [sic], methods of public influence, the influence of public opinion will be utilised'. In a collectivised society, 'the Communist man...[is] distinguished by conscious collectivism and deep concern for the common good'; but the issues which preoccupy him are those imposed upon his controlled and easily manipulated mind by 'political correctness'.  In his closing remarks to the 28th CPSU Congress on 13th July 1990, Mikhail Gorbachev said that the restructured' CPSU would become a truly vanguard party whose power lies not in giving orders but in influencing people's minds'.

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

BY

CHRISTOPHER STORY

[WE HAVE A LARGE NUMBER OF BULLETINS ON OUR WEBSITE SINCE 2005 DETAILING THE WORK OF THE ABOVE

A

TRUTH SEEKER AND PATRIOT

*

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

-ENEMY OF ITS MEMBER STATES BY CHRISTOPHER STORY -

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

*

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

FEBRUARY 23, 2017

H F 1130 FREEDOM NOW

*
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

 

[A LESSON OF HISTORY]]

 

     

    Throughout its benighted history,

     

    megalomaniacs have tried and failed

     

    to

     

    subjugate Europe's sovereign nations.

     

     

    Here, with Brussels making the same

     

    mistake,

     

    says SIMON JENKINS asks will they ever learn

     

     

    from...

     

     

    2,000 YEARS OF HUBRIS AND FOLLY

SATURDAY

ESSAY

BY

SIMON JENKINS: Dictators failed to unite Europe's ... - Daily Mail

OCTOBER 20, 2018

 

ON AUGUST 6, 1806, a herald in full regalia rode across Vienna to the city's Jesuit church. He climbed the tower blew his silver trumpet and summoned the crowd to silence. he then announced that the Holy Roman Empire was dead.

After a thousand years of existence, Europe's oldest union was being wound up-courtesy of Napoleon. The crowd wept.

Might it happen again? History tells us that whenever Europe tries to act in unison, it screws up. The Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne left an empire that collapsed in ruins. Ferdinand of Bohemia tried to create a single Roman Catholic empire, and unleashed the Thirty Years War in the 17th century. Napoleon brought most of Europe under his rod, an millions died until Wellington did for him at Waterloo.

 The Allies punished Germany after the First World War, and so brought Hitler to power. Today's European Union mishandled Russia after 1989 and paved  the way for the reign of Vladimir Putin.

Anyone who believes the EU is so modern, united and peace-loving that it will deftly handle Britain's departure should read history and shudder.

 Ever since somewhere called Europe came into being under the Ancient Greeks, two forces have driven this continent forward.

One is the  inability of the descendents of its original migrant tribes to live in peace with their neighbours. The other is the attempt of one power

 [GERMANY TODAY]

after another to seek to dominate and unite those disparate tribes.

 

Rome  tried. So did successive popes, Holy Roman emperors, Louis XIV, Napoleon, Hitler and now, dare I add, the leaders of the European Union. Some of these attempts were well-intentioned; most were not so'

There is no question they together forged a continent that is globally outstanding.

Today, Europe is wealthy, stable, mostly liberal and a magnet to the world's migrants, rich and poor alike. Whether this was  because of or in spite of a history of ceaseless conflict is an open question, But so, too, is whether half a century of stability can survive any new breakdown in unity.

WHEN I first studied Europe's history, I searched for themes that have glued together its various forces. First was the potency of ancient Mediterranean culture. Greece under Pericles was a kingdom of reason, fascinated by the human condition as expressed in art, literature and civic politics.

Rome was a sort of opposite, a realm of law and order, the wielding of power over the entire Mediterranean basin. 'These be your arts, O Rome, 'said Virgil, to impose the ways of peace,' The operative word was impose.

As Roman rule disintegrated, it mutated into that of the Christian Church.

Christianity was ostensibly a doctrine of universal love and peace, but it soon became a cauldron of rivalry and disunity. It split Rome from Constantinople, and proved so quarrelsome that a third of Christendom-in the Levant and Africa-became Muslim and has remained so ever since.

 In 1216, the bid of Pope Innocent III to declare himself sovereign lord of Europe bred endless conflict with the Holy Roman Empire, based in Germany. So we can conclude that as a glue of union, religion was a failure. By the 16th century the Reformation had split Innocent's Roman church in two, between Protestant north and Catholic south.

This in turn led to the Thirty Years War-the cruellest devastation of Europe before the 20th century. From the wreckage of that first great European War ever more potent nation states -notably France, Spain and Austria.

The new cause of disruption was not religion but dynasty. Louis XIV sought perpetual war with his neighbours. Russia flexed its territorial muscles. Frederick the Great of Prussia declared that 'national enlargement is a fundamental law of life'. To him, Europe was synonymous with struggle.

Nothing seemed able to bring peace to the continent: not the vitality of the Renaissance or wisdom of the Enlightenment, not great thinkers and writers like Petrarch, Shakespeare. Locke, Voltaire or Goethe.

Napoleon's attempt to unite Europe under French rule led to

5,000,000 DEATHS

The victorious nations at the Congress of Vienna in 1815, a few months after Waterloo valiantly attempted a

'Concert of Europe'.

In future, they ordained, difference would be settled around a conference table not the battlefield.

Peace lasted for a century, while Europe plunged into a different form of aggrandisement-that of overseas imperialism

By the end of the 19th century, the British, French, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish and Germans ruled an astonishing half the world's population and 85 per cent of its trade

Some might have hoped that such expansion might leave Europe itself in peace. Yet no sooner had it strutted the globe as a champion of progress then it fell victim to two of the world's most horrendous conflagrations.

The idea that the 'Kaiser's war' and then 'Hitler's war were random Prussian monstrosities was absurd. They resulted from a failure of political imagination and leadership across all of Europe, whose turbulent nations seemed incurably belligerent.

 By 1945, Europe was in self-inflicted ruins. Its peoples were starving, its cities destroyed and a centuries-old edifice of cultural achievement was crippled. Though Fascism had been defeated, the price was half a continent enslaved to Communism, and the other half dependent on American protection.

There is no doubt that the subsequent half-century saw  Europe at its best. It rebuilt itself, displaying a sincere desire for there never to be a war ever again

 A Common Market was formed in 1956 under the Treaty of Rome. This treaty grew and flourished, until a free trade area covered virtually all non-communist Europe. The continent seemed genuinely at peace, under the embrace of 'ever closer union'.

 But as this half of Europe prospered and cohered, it also slid into the morass of bureaucratic centralism. And here is where the lessons of history were ignored

 

The ambition of the Brussels  elite was curiously reminiscent of the medieval church. It became a quest for ever-tighter control of its adherents, and a disregard for the political mood of member states

The first moment of truth came with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. This ended the wartime division of Europe, to which the EU reacted like a conquering power. It enticed Russia's old Warsaw Pact allies into the EU and NATO, and left Moscow dangerously isolated.

When Boris Yeltsin warned that advancing NATO deep into Eastern  Europe meant 'the flames of war could break out again across Europe, the EU laughed.

The result was Vladimir Putin, vowing to 'make Russia great again' under  his kleptomaniac rule.  In the U.S., the balance of power between a central superstate and its various subordinate states was embedded in a constitution, written in blood. I Europe, that balance was left to evolve.

The EU ignored the risks it was running, not just in mishandling Russia, but in readily opening its borders to the immature democracies of Eastern Europe.

[And not forgetting the arrival in Germany of the once East German official Frau Merkel.]

After Maastricht in 1992, which effectively pledged the continent to become one giant federal entity, majority voting in the EU council eroded the authority of NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS.

Europe seemed the plaything of French bureaucrats and German bankers.

[HITLER WOULD BE PROUD]

Once more, the hard-learned lessons of the past were disregarded in the zealous pursuit of a new Nirvana. For example, the continent's longest confederation was the Holy Roman Empire. Voltaire may have called it not holy, nor Roman nor an empire-but its respect for the treasured autonomy of dozens of German princelings contrived to keep the German people's at peace with their neighbours for a millennium. Europe gained in the process, the wealth of the Rhine and the Baltic, the radicalism of Luther and the genius of Bach and Beethoven. That union collapsed only when Napoleon in France and then Bismarck in Germany could not tolerate what they saw as affront to their imperial ambitions.

The collapse of a united Europe did neither tyrant any good, but it did turn Germany from a peaceful confederacy - a kind of giant Switzerland - into a belligerent power under the supremacy of warlike Prussia.

The lessons must be obvious. Attempts at European union fail when they lose respect for the

IDENTITY

AND

AUTONOMY

of the continent's ancestral communities

You cannot ram union, let alone

GLOBALISATION

down people's throats. Diversity lies at the core of Europe's collective experience, but it is jealously guarded diversity.

Europe can never be subsumed under a single power structure. Union can only be a light-touch and consensual.

The EU's greatest mistake was to move beyond ever-closer trade to an ill-defined' ever closer union'. Above all, it lay in demanding that member states accept open borders.

That may have seemed a small matter to the globe-trotting cosmopolites of Brussels. But control over immigration meant control over the

CHARACTER and RATE of CHANGE of LOCAL COMMUNITIES.

To the member states of Europe this was a critical area-of sovereignty

[sacrosanct]

The character of one's society is not to be bartered merely for tariff-free trade.

Unlike previous unions in Europe, the EU is a collection of self -determining democracies.

Already by 2010, anti-European sentiment was growing and consent crumbling. Turnouts in EU elections plummeted from

60 % to 40 per cent.

Populist politicians-anti immigration and often anti EU-emerged in the UK. France, Italy, Germany and former communist states. The 2008 financial crisis saw the Eurozone's GERMAN MASTERS  inflict terrible damage on GREECE and SPAIN.

Then in 2016, the UK shattered the equilibrium. Its people voted -narrowly- to withdraw. Europe's union face d a fissure, and a deep one.

There was nothing new in Britain detaching itself from the rest of Europe. It had 'left' after the Hundred Years War that finally ended in the mid-15th century and after Henry V111's defection from Rome nearly a century later. It refused to join the Common Market in 1957, and only combined under NATO to benefit from America's nuclear shield.

Now, once again, Britain has said

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

We should have no doubt of the reason. Political Europe has not found an answer to the question that defied all earlier attempts at union. How can this fragmentary continent be united without lurching either towards debilitating central authority or towards disintegration

Since the Lisbon Treaty of 2009, the EU has lurched towards the former. Now, with the rise of a reactionary populism, it is lurching towards the latter

There is hardly a member state that would dare imitate Britain and hold a Referendum on EU membership. But that is insufficient consent for union.

With or without Britain the EU must find a way of returning substantive sovereignty to its 

MEMBER STATES

not least over their borders. If it does that, who knows, Britain might rejoin.

If it fails, Britain will not be the only defector. The EU will go the way of its many forerunners - to

DISINTEGRATION and DANGER.

*  *  *

 

SIMON JENKINS: Dictators failed to unite Europe's ... - Daily Mail

OCTOBER 20,2018

 

A SHORT History of Europe:

From Pericles to Putin by Simon Jenkins. Viking, £25 (20pc discount), visit www.mailshop.co.uk/books or call 0844 571 0640, p&p is free on orders over £15. Spend £30 on books and get FREE premium delivery. Offer valid to 27/11/2018

shop

H.F.1678

 
 
 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 
 
2018-12-31

 

If we all push, 2019 will see final victory against the Khazarian mafia

By  White Dragon Society  9 Comments
Many signs indicate that 2019 will be a breakthrough year in the battle against the satan-worshiping Khazarian mafia.  Not only have mass arrests begun, but the mass-murdering part of the pharmacidical/medical establishment is finally being taken out as well.  Another obvious sign it is no longer business as usual comes from the fact that the U.S. military is being withdrawn from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.  And this time the U.S. government shutdown may actually result in formal bankruptcy procedures against the illegal corporate government that has occupied Washington, D.C. since 1871.

Let’s start with the U.S. military withdrawals, since they mark one of the biggest changes seen since the end of World War II when the perpetual war economy of the U.S. military-industrial complex began.  Pentagon sources say U.S. President Donald Trump’s Christmas Day visit to Iraq portends a pull-out from that country.  This follows withdrawal announcements from Afghanistan and Syria, as well as a ceasefire in Yemen.  We also note that almost all of the U.S. carrier groups are now at rest in their home ports.

Even more dramatically, the sources say, “Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan’s mission will be [to bring out in public view the] space force, bring troops home, release extraterrestrial and suppressed technology, close overseas bases, beat swords into plowshares and cut waste, while building a more lethal military.”  This means peace on earth and goodwill to all in a very real sense this holiday season.

The Pentagon sources also say the long U.S. government shutdown “makes it easy to arrest Deep-Staters embedded in the government.”  Furthermore, the first senior official to be publicly tried in “Nuremburg 2.0 will be ….
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-12-24

Western civilization heading for a reboot over the holidays

By  Weekly Reports  264 Comments
Many signs and confirmations from highly placed sources indicate that a reboot of Western civilization is being planned for 2019.  The shutdown of the U.S. government over the holidays, for example, has nothing to do with building a wall, and everything to do with a financial reboot and upcoming military tribunals.

However, what is coming is about much more than just rounding up the criminals who hijacked and bankrupted the U.S. government—it is about fixing the problems besetting monotheism.

Since today is December 24th, Christmas Eve, it’s a good time to remind people of the historical truth behind this holiday.  The fact is that nobody knows when Jesus Christ was born, so the early Christian church hijacked the old solar New Year holiday and replaced the sun with Jesus.  Here’s the thing:  the sun sets at its most northern point on December 21st, the winter solstice.  For three days afterwards, it appears to set at the same place, and then on December 25th it starts setting further south, marking the birth of the solar New Year.  Thus, the Christian church needs to confess and tell people the truth about Christmas without in any way denying the wonderful teachings of Jesus Christ and Christianity.

The Jews, for their part, need to stop celebrating the xenophobic Hanukkah and realize that it is perfectly kosher to celebrate the solar New Year (unless they somehow think the Creator did not make the sun).  Anyway, Merry Christmas to the Christians and Muslims, and Merry Sunmas to everybody else.

These issues, together with discussions of updating the calendars to bring them back into line with the movements of the heavens on which they are based, are going to be part of a broad public discourse in the New Year.  That is because, at the highest levels of world power, a decision has been made to go ahead and rebuild the temple in Jerusalem and turn that city into an international free zone.  This is why 2019 is likely to be a year for the history books.

In preparation for these upcoming historical changes, U.S. troops are being withdrawn from various conflict zones in order to pave the way for world peace, CIA sources say.  Pentagon sources agree, adding that “U.S. President Donald Trump is pulling out of Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, and the Ukraine to terminate the Deep State and the Zionists, since the global currency reset requires peace and cessation of hostilities.”

European royal family sources concur that preparations are under way for a reboot of the global financial system.  The current U.S. dollar, Euro, and Japanese yen-based system is bankrupt and dysfunctional, these and other sources agree.  This is especially true of the United States, which has been bankrupt for quite some time now, the sources say.  That’s why this current U.S. government shutdown is going to lead to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-12-17

Secret head of world finance, Cardinal Pell, fired and big changes coming

By  Weekly Reports, White Dragon Society  337 Comments
Last week Cardinal George Pell was found guilty of sexually abusing children by an Australian court and was subsequently fired by Pope Francis because he was “elderly.”
 https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/12/12/cardinal-pell-top-advisor-pope-francis-found-guilty-historical-sexual-offenses

This is huge news in the secret world of finance, because Pell was the person in charge of financial matters at the Vatican and thus was a secret controller of most world government leaders, P2 Freemason and CIA sources say.  This is because when most world rulers take power, they get a visit from an official of the Vatican Bank who hands them a bank book with an astronomical number written in it (a billion dollars or more for big countries;  less for smaller countries).  They are then told, “Welcome to the world of the rich,” and are gently reminded that if they refuse to accept the money they will be “removed.”

This is the choice of silver or lead that has allowed the Vatican P2 Freemason Lodge, run by descendants of the Caesars, to secretly rule most world governments.  The 200 leaders who last week affirmed the fraudulent “carbon causes global warming” agreement are all slaves of this system, P2 Freemason and CIA sources agree.
 https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/12/14/18139402/cop24-climate-change-katowice-poland

Thus, the removal of the head of this secret control system will have huge repercussions for world finance and politics, depending on who is selected to replace him, and also depending on whether or not this secret system will be allowed to continue.

On that front, another huge news item (still not fully confirmed because it only comes from one royal family source) is that a new head of the Committee of 300, the secret government of the 13 ruling bloodline families, will take power next year.  This means Queen Elizabeth will be handing the committee reins to a younger person (hint:  not Charles and not William).

With this caveat in mind (i.e., only one source), here some excerpts from a statement by the soon-to-be-appointed new committee head:  “The 13 ruling bloodlines and I have had enough of this world and the minions charged with its curation.  All Sovereign Heads of State and all respective governments fired.  Ordo ab Chao.”

The source also said, “Sir Alexander Younger at MI6 is already briefed, along with the Queen in London and the Emperor in Tokyo,” about this development.

The statement further read that, “The Habsburg dynasty and spin-offs—most criminally psychopathic—have …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-12-13

Previous JCS Chairman

By  Letters to the Editor  0 Comments
Ben:  Enjoy your weekly newsletters and I put more credence in you than any other source.  I’m curious about your comment in last newsletter, “as the previous JCS Chairman was Army.”  I believe you’ll find that Gen. Joseph Dunford was a United States Marine.  Means a lot to us former active duty Marines!  Have a great day.
I was referring to his predecessor Mike Dempsey, since Dunford is still JCS Chairman for now.
–BF

 

 
2018-12-31

 

H.F.1769

 

 

Israel, UK and Brexit

By on February 4, 2019

Gilad Atzmon – gilad.co.uk Feb 4, 2019

Israel Union Jack

Introduction by GA: The following is a translation of the last segment of an article in Ynet  yesterday on Brexit. The article explains that: the Jewish State has located itself as post Brexit Britain’s gateway to the world: “Once out of the EU, Britain will have to sign separate trade agreements with each state, and Israel will be the first.” And that: “Israel has become Britain’s strategic ally.” And, of course, “the British government totally disregard the boycott campaign against Israel. On a political level, they boycotted the boycott.”
A few years ago we learned that back in 1982 Oded Yinon devised an Israeli ‘plan for the Middle East.’ The following Ynet’s segment provides us with a glimpse into the current ‘Israel’s plan for Britain.’
If you have been puzzled by the insane institutional campaign against Corbyn  (BOD, Jewish Chronicle, CAA, etc.) the Ynet article raises the possibility that the campaign has not actually been about ‘antisemitism.’ It is more likely about shekles: Corbyn in Number Ten could easily interfere with ‘Israel’s plans for Britain.’ The Ynet article may also help Brits to understand the bipartisan forces that operate intensively to push Britain to break away from the EU. For some reason some of the staunch Israel supporters within the Government and in the Parliament are also pushing hard for Brexit. Ask yourself, do they do it for Britain, Brits and British national interests or are they, once again, serving the interests of that dark and oppressive foreign state.

The Brexit Hurricane

https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-5456081,00.html

“…It turns out that on some fronts the British began to prepare in advance. When it decided to withdraw from the European Union, Britain was even more enthusiastic about reaching agreements to sign bilateral trade agreements, this time not through the EU, but with countries around the world. The Brits saw the signing of these trade agreements as evidence of Britain’s steadfastness. Time and time again, British leaders, headed by Teresa May, said that “Britain can maximise its business and commercial potential beyond the EU as well.” Israel was one of the first stations in that campaign. Once out of the EU, Britain will have to sign such agreements with each state, and Israel will be the first.
 In recent years, Israel has become Britain’s strategic ally. Innovation, technological, intelligence and cyber capabilities have made Israel one of the most popular potential partners in Britain. The volume of trade between the two countries rose to a record $ 11 billion last year, of which $ 5 billion was Israeli exports to Britain, and the rest was British imports to Israel. After the United States, Britain is the largest exporter to Israel, and trade relations span a wide range of fields – energy, pharmaceuticals, food and technology – and the British government’s total disregard of the boycott organizations against Israel. On the political level, they boycotted the boycott.
In the past year, teams of British and Israeli economic ministries have gathered to discuss bilateral trade agreements. They had to draft new agreements, since the current trade agreements between the two countries were within the framework of the European Union. Ohad Cohen, head of the Foreign Trade Department in the Ministry of Economics, who was in charge of the talks on the Israeli side, said that the British had entered talks with a simple task: to continue without unnecessary shocks, to repeat most of the clauses in the agreement that Israel signed with the EU in 1995.
“They came and said, ‘Whatever was, will be,'” Cohen said. “In other words, they wanted Israel to continue to trade with Britain on the same terms, with full customs exemptions, and to make very small changes to existing agreements, especially in quantities. Britain has named Israel as one of the first countries with which it wants to sign a bilateral agreement, and it is important for the British government to ensure that the commercial ties between the two countries are not harmed.”
According to Cohen, the negotiations were oblivious to the many changes that have stirred the British political system in the past year. The British did not arrive with any panic for the negotiations with Israel, not even when ministers resigned one by one and Theresa May’s government was crushed under the wheels of Brexit. “The only difference is that they were required to set up a unit that deals with trade agreements, which they did not have before, because before everything went through the EU institutions in Brussels,” says Cohen.
Thus, in the coming month a trade agreement between the two countries is supposed to be signed. After Israel, Britain expects  to sign trade agreements with some 70 other countries, including its closest ally, the US. The agreement with the Americans is very important, because for a Brexit government this is a prestigious card and a proof that Britain can stand on its feet even outside the European Union…”

Source

Posted in , , | Leave a response

Gilad Atzmon, a former Israeli soldier now a writer and an award winning Jazz musician resident in London, where he lives in virtual exile

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.

 

February 4, 2019

[WE DECIDED TO ENTER AT RANDOM TODAY ONE OF OUR OVER 4,000 BULLETINS AND THE ABOVE LINK CAME TO HAND. WE ALREADY HAVE A NUMBER OF GILAD ATZON ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE AND WE CONSIDER HIS WORK INVESTIGATIVE AND SOLID AND WE THEREFORE DECIDED TO INCLUDE IT IN OUR FEBRUARY 2019 INFORMATION. IT HAS GIVEN US MUCH THOUGHT AS YOU CAN IMAGINE AS WE ARE FOR A HARD BREXIT RATHER THAN A SOFT NO BREXIT .]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1792

 
 

 

     

    Every EU nation relies on Britain

     

     

     

     

     

     for jobs

     

     

     

     

     

    according to ... - Daily Mail

     

     

     

     

    By James Slack - Political Editor
     

    Full article

    SEPTEMBER 23-2016
 

[IN ORDER TO GET THE BETTER OF THE EU BEAST IT NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE IN ERNEST TO COMPLETE THE EXIT . WE SHOULD ENTER A TRADE AGREEMENT WITH A COMMONWEALTH COUNTRY AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE MOMENT IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT WE DON'T INTEND TO BE FOBBED OFF WITH THREATS OF ANY KIND. ONCE ONE TRADE AGREEMENT HAS BEEN CONCLUDED AND THE PARTICULAR EU STATE REALISES THEY WILL BE LOSING THEIR BUSINESS IN THE UK TO AN OUTSIDER IT WILL CONCENTRATE  OTHER MINDS  TO AGREE A QUICK BREXIT RESULT. ONE NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE EU WAS A NAZI-PLANNED PROGRAMME TO WIN GERMAN DOMINATION AND CONTROL IN EUROPE AFTER THEY LOST THE SECOND WORLD WAR. AND MANY OF US WHO WERE HERE IN 1939 KNOW THAT YOU CANNOT EXPECT ENGLISH FAIR PLAY WHEN DEALING WITH HITLER'S SUCCESSORS WHO RUN A COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-GODLESS-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

''AS THEY SAY IN WAR AND IN PEACE-KNOW YOUR ENEMY'

WE KNOW OURS!

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

SEPTEMBER 23-2016

H.F.981

 

 

 

Revealed:

The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich ...in the EU

*

 

By Adam Lebor
Last updated at 10:30 PM on 09th May 2009

 

 

The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for 's post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis' return to power and work for a 'strong German empire'. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

 

Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with I. G. Farben

Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben

The three-page, closely typed report, marked 'Secret', copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany's economy by sending money through Switzerland.

They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire - but not just German.

The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.

The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of . The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War.

But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact.

Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.

Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?

The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 - and it paints an extraordinary picture.

The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.

 

Auschwitz

Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a factory run by German firm I. G. Farben

There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. 'It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.' Such defeatist talk was treasonous - enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo's cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.

But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to 'make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion'.

The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.

They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company.

But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.

Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich.

In stage one, the industrialists were to 'prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis', using the term for the French resistance.

Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a 'secure post-war foundation in foreign countries', while 'existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat'.

In stage three, German businesses would set up a 'sleeper' network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power.

'The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,' Bosse announced.

'Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.'

 

Enlarge   The 1944 Red House Report

Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing 'plans of German industrialists to engage in underground activity'

The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission.

The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.

Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.

Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence.

The Red House Report's author notes: 'Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence.

'Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party's plans for its post-war operations.'

The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter.

More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.

During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it.

A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.

He says: 'By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.'

Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.

As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.

A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad's gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility.

By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf's ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS's massive pan-European economic empire after Germany's defeat.

Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the transition to a post-war economy after Germany's defeat. This was dangerous, especially as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups.

But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service, protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS.

Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS's economic empire almost worthless.

The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to introduce a currency that would have any value.

That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency, Germany was once again an attractive trading partner.

The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires across Europe.

War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 - despite six years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments - the capital stock of assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the armaments boom.

Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered European continent. The answer was through supranationalism - the voluntary surrender of national sovereignty to an international body.

Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today.

But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists convicted of war crimes.

The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years.

Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death.

The Krupp company soon became one of Europe's leading industrial combines.

The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a fortune of more than $1billion, the equivalent of £400million at the time.

'For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,' says historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers.

'The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.'

Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the V1 rocket.

Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with the SS officers overseeing the camps.

Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany's most powerful banker, had prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of Deutsche Bank, Germany's biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded, Deutsche Bank enthusiastically 'Aryanised' Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were owned by Jews.

By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche Bank's wealth had quadrupled.

Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, as Deutsche Bank's representative. I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany's most powerful companies, formed out of a union of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties.

It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other prisoners died producing artificial rubber.

When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis' chilling term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent for which was owned by I.G. Farben.

But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben's bosses hedged their bets.

During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard's research. After the war, 24 I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III - but only twelve of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder.

Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany's post-war reconstruction. It was largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a 'strong German empire' was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today's European Union.

Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid - reconstruction funds - to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany's economic recovery.

Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.

Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are strikingly familiar today - on monetary integration and common transport, energy and welfare systems.

When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs was his most important financial adviser.

Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer.

That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and European Commission.

Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard Germany's first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as Chancellor for three years.

But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe - was built on mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by German companies in the Nazi era was

 2,700,000.

Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry.

A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer 5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any further legal action.

To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of £1.8billion.

Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory.

But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief, once said: 'In 50 years' time nobody will think of nation states.'

For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today's drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich - an economic rather than military imperium.

• The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor's thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is published by Reportage Press.

 

Places:

,

Print this article Print this article

Read later Read later

Email to a friend Email to a friend

 

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

 

*

[ Prime Minister Edward Heath was a NAZI SPY for over 60 years to his death in 2005 before which he publicly admitted that he had lied to the people when he said there would be no loss of sovereignty. His fellow traitors were Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon who were reported to MI5 in 1938 by the Master Lindsay of Balliol College Oxford . Harold MacMillian before him was exposed by intelligence sources 13 years earlier in 1957 as an agent of the German Abwehr.     

This country has been served by many traitors since that day as a look at the list of members of the

and that is not a complete list because of the great difficulty of obtaining the names of those who belong to such a secretive body.  But we know that Gordon Brown- Ed Balls on the Labour side and Kenneth Clarke and George Osborne the Shadow Chancellor on the Tory side. The Liberal Democrats have their David Steel and no doubt many others. The Governor of the Bank of England Mervyn King is also on the list and this man has charge of our of the future financial  health of our nation. And we must not forget our greatest despot Tony Blair.

www.worldreports.org.uk

[We have hundreds of Bulletins on the European Union listed below

*

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

 

H.F.1290

 
PETER OBORNE

 

 

PETER OBORNE: Our complacent and complicit foreign aid civil servants should hang their heads in shame over the Oxfam charity scandal which will take years to recover from

By Peter Oborne For The Daily Mail

As well as Oxfam and other charities exposed for misdemeanours in Haiti, the
UK's Department for International Development is also in the dock, writes PETER
OBORNE

 

February 17, 2018

Oxfam will take years to recover from the sickening scandal in Haiti, but the UK Department for International Development is also in the dock. Former Secretary of State Priti Patel (pictured) is believed to have known about it all and stayed quiet

Oxfam will take years to recover from the sickening scandal in Haiti. Other charities, too, whose staff have been exposed for awful misdemeanours have seen their reputations badly damaged.

However, the Department for International Development (DfID), which has given hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers' money to these charities, is also in the dock.

We now know its officials were aware of the shocking culture of sexual abuse, exploitation and paedophilia that exists in Oxfam and in much of the rest of the aid sector that DfID oversees.

Former DfID secretary Priti Patel said government officials 'at the highest levels' knew about aid workers' sex abuse (with some victims being children) but tried to keep it hushed up.

She said the Oxfam scandal in Haiti was just 'the tip of the iceberg'. Yet DfID did nothing to stop it.

This means the taxpayer-funded DfID — whose mission statement is to 'tackle the global challenges of our time, including poverty and disease, mass migration, insecurity and conflict' and to 'build a safer, healthier, more prosperous world' — must bear responsibility for what went on. Indeed, it's very possible that, without the newspaper investigation that exposed the Haiti scandal, DfID officials would still be condoning such appalling behaviour.

There is clearly something very rotten at the heart of DfID. Yet the department seems blissfully unaware of this.

As recently as January, DfID's permanent secretary Matthew Rycroft boasted that he was in charge of a 'well run and well organised department'.

Such complacency beggars belief. For the truth is that its complicity in the Oxfam scandal is just the latest example of DfID's tolerance of corruption and worse. 

As has been well documented, it shovels billions of pounds a year into countries run by some of the most brutal regimes in the world.

Very few dictators are too bloodthirsty or barbaric for DfID not to do business with.

Cynically, they abuse the generosity of people in the West by using their donations in order to spend less themselves on welfare programmes for their own people.

Instead, DfID's largesse allows them to invest huge sums in excessive arms budgets — or, worse, line their own pockets and amass personal fortunes in Swiss bank accounts.
 

Patel said the Oxfam scandal in Haiti was just 'the tip of the iceberg'. Yet DfID did nothing to stop it, writes Peter Oborne 

No wonder it is said — not in jest — that the definition of overseas aid is 'the transfer of cash from the pockets of poor people in rich countries to the bank accounts of rich people in poor countries'.

Lest it be forgotten, Britain's foreign aid budget last year alone totalled £13.3 billion. The cases of this money being abused are too numerous to list in full.

In Ethiopia, for example, DfID spent hundreds of millions with a Marxist government that puts communist propaganda into school textbooks. 
 

Mikelange Gabo (pictured) claims sacked Oxfam boss Roland Van Hauwermeiren started a sexual relationship with her when she was just 17 

In Syria, our taxes fund armed groups which my sources in the country say may be linked to Al-Qaeda.

In Pakistan, Imran Khan, the former national cricket captain and a leading opposition leader, called for foreign aid to be halted because he believes it corrupts and weakens his country.

He says: 'Why should the Pakistani rich bother to pay taxes when foreign loans and aid money are always there to cover up their incompetence and corruption and pay for their lavish lifestyle?'

Also, he asks: 'Why should politicians bother to fix the economy when they can artificially maintain it' with foreign donations?
 

Scandal-hit Van Hauwermeiren (pictured) is alleged to have spotted her in the street while she was eight months pregnant and told her: 'I find you very sexy, how can I help you?'

Many respected economic studies show the best way to lift people out of poverty is not through handing out aid but through trade, encouraged by free market capitalism. 

But this is frowned upon by many DfID civil servants and charity activists, a large proportion of whom hold Left-wing views and spend their lives going from one well-paid job in the bloated public sector to another.

Equally, I am convinced overseas aid has increasingly less to do with helping the poor in foreign countries and more to do with self-preening government ministers trying to flaunt their compassion.
 

Pictured: A mountainous region outside Haitian capital Port-au-Prince 

These virtue-signallers are more interested in boasting about the size of their budgets and posing for photocalls during short visits abroad rather than ensuring taxpayers' money is well spent.

And I'm afraid the truth is that DfID has not been well served in the choice of its ministers over recent years.

Under Tory-led governments there has been Andrew Mitchell who went native and was widely rebuked after claiming, at a time of austerity at home, that he wanted the UK to be seen around the world as a foreign aid superpower.

Tactlessly, he criticised his successor, Justine Greening, saying she never wanted the job and that she had failed to rebut claims that huge sums of foreign aid had been lost in corruption and waste.

Greening didn't last long. Her replacement was Priti Patel, who was only in the job 15 months before being sacked for breaking the ministerial code by holding undeclared meetings in Israel, in a clumsy bid, it seemed, to promote her own political ambitions.

Patel's position was all the more disingenuous because, before her appointment, she had argued that

DfID ought to be abolished. 

She quickly reversed this once in charge. And during her tenure, nothing changed.

Patel's replacement, Penny Mordaunt, now has an opportunity to restore discipline and standards.
 

The Oxfam Haiti scandal shocked the nation after it emerged earlier this month 

Above all, she should order a root-and-branch overhaul of her entire department.

Britain has spent about £70 billion of taxpayers' money on international aid since the Conservatives came to power in 2010. This is an incredible £2,500 from every British family.

Only a forensic audit can determine how much has been squandered and how much actually needs to be spent at all.

As a foreign reporter, I've visited many trouble spots around the world where DfID money is spent, and wouldn't deny for a moment that there are places where it has done a great deal of good.

Yet I've also witnessed evidence of a huge waste of money, not least in Pakistan, where hundreds of millions have been frittered away in a largely fruitless attempt to reform the education system.

I believe the Government's commitment to spend 0.7 per cent of gross domestic product on foreign aid a year is utterly misguided.

In a country where NHS beds are scarce and a care system is collapsing, we simply can't afford that largesse.

I dearly hope Penny Mordaunt, the latest minister in charge of what has become a gold mine for corrupt foreign dictators and child abusers, has the courage and will to restore discipline to her out-of-control department.

Otherwise, public belief in international aid, and respect for the noble principle of charity-giving, may never recover.
 

Too soft on Myanmar

On his recent visit to Myanmar (formerly Burma) to see the devastation inflicted by the country's army on the minority Rohingya Muslims, Boris Johnson challenged the government's false propaganda that the Rohingya burnt down their own houses. 

He should have gone further and accused the Myanmar government — led by Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi — of carrying out genocide. 

I'm convinced he held back because it would have necessitated the British government stepping in to try to stop the killing — something it hasn't the stomach for. 

Why won't the Foreign Office do anything to halt the rape and murder in our former colony? 
 

On his recent visit to Myanmar (formerly Burma) to see the devastation inflicted by the country's army on the minority Rohingya Muslims, Boris Johnson (pictured) challenged the government's false propaganda that the Rohingya burnt down their own houses

 

Today, Ukip members meet to vote on the future of their party's beleaguered leader, Henry Bolton.

He has become a figure of public ridicule — defying colleagues' calls for him to resign after he walked out on his wife and children for an affair with a far younger woman who has been exposed for appalling racist views.

Yesterday, Nigel Farage — who has acted like the most irritating back-seat driver since standing down as leader after the EU referendum — gave his backing to Bolton.

He's right. Useless though Bolton undoubtedly is, Ukip will become even more of a laughing stock if it has its ninth change of leader since 2009.
 

Today, Ukip members meet to vote on the future of their party's beleaguered leader, Henry Bolton (pictured)



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5402335/

PETER-OBORNE-foreign-aid-civil-servants-ashamed.html#ixzz57O0ZUQl3
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 *  *  *

Peter Osborne: Boris Johnson's

Brexit

views are persuasive

 

February 17, 2018

 

H.F.1479

 

EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED AS ILLEGAL

 

A criminalized organisation

 

Monday 10th October,2005

 London.

 

BRITAIN CAN LEAVE

THIS ILLEGAL ‘FESTERING DUSTBIN OF CORRUPTION’ TOMORROW

 

The European Union Collective is illegal and so extensively criminalized that it has become all but indistinguishable from a criminal organization.

 

It is illegal because key EU treaties were procured by means of slush fund payments.

 
It is criminal because, being born in corruption, its procedures are designed to mask the corrupt activities of many of its officials, while it publishes false accounts.
 
Britain is free to leave immediately, as explained below.

 

These findings are published today the 10th October 2005 in the latest issue of International Currency Review, the London -based Journal of the International Financial Community.

 

·                The fraudulence of the European Commission’s accounts necessitates urgent consideration of its Triple-A Credit Rating by the leading Rating Agencies. Precise evidence of the fraudulence of the EC’s accounts is presented in the issue. (Normally this scandalous state of affairs is ‘successfully’ shoved under the carpet).

·                International Currency Review has advised the agencies accordingly, and anticipates that they will carry out the necessary overdue reassessment of the EU’s ‘integrity’. In the event that zero action is taken, given the extreme gravity of the evidence of institutionalised accounting fraud presented in the journal, the integrity of the Credit Rating Agencies themselves may be called into question - not least by International Currency Review.

 

This may have repercussions for the International Financial Community generally.

*

WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS ILLEGAL AND ILLEGITIMATE

 

But first things first. The illegitimacy and illegality of the European Union-and thus of ALL its constituent structures, including the European Central Bank - arises from the following facts:

 

The British Treaty of Accession was signed by two agents of the German ‘Black’ Nazi intelligence continuum, DVD -This is the ultra-secret German Nazi continuing ‘Black Operations’ intelligence organisation based, appropriately enough, in Dachau, near Munich.

 

Intelligence concerning the existence was passed to the Editor of International Currency Review: Christopher Story FRSA - Veteran UK financial and intelligence analyst

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org Telephone +44-(0) 20-7222 3836

 

by

 

British intelligence sources

 

 

The Editor then had its contents checked out by high -level US intelligence contacts, who confirmed the entity’s existence and importance.

 

There remains some uncertainty about what the initials DVD stand for- alternatively Deutsche Versicherungs Dienst [German Insurance Agency] or else Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst [German Defence Agency] - the context here being that DVD is the intelligence [Abwehr] continuum of the

 

NAZI INTERNATIONAL

 

Originally established by the Nazi Abwehr as the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid in 1942.

 

Therefore, in this context, ‘insurance’ would mean ‘insurance’ would mean ‘insuring the continuity of Nazi global hegemony strategy for the controlling

a

Thousand-Year Reich.’

 

While ‘defence’ in this same context would mean ‘defending’ the continuing covert Nazi global hegemony strategy.

 

DVD is not funded by the German Government and Taxpayer, since it operates its own covert sources of giga-finance; but its primary operations and strategy are routinely approved by the German Chancellery.

 

Any official denial of this fact is a lie

 

To continue:

 

The signatories, both - of The British treaty of Accession whom received substantial financial rewards for their ‘co-operation’, were Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon. Together with the late Roy Jenkins, they were recruited by the German Abwehr while studying at Balliol College, Oxford. This intelligence has emerged since the recent death of Sir Edward Heath [Another Traitor amongst many who have been honoured by the Queen with a title]

 

*

THE E.U. TREATIES ARE ROUTINELY PROCURED BY FRAUDULENT MEANS:

 

That is to say, official signatories and senior policymakers/operatives have received substantial corrupt payments, remitted to their secret offshore bank accounts, in exchange for their ‘co-operation’ in pushing through successive E.U. Treaties.

 

The bribery funds are derived from a colossal secret ‘Black Operations’ slush fund account located in Switzerland -the title and size of which is divulged in the REPORT.

 

For instance:

 

$5.0 billion was allocated in 2004 from the secret Swiss slush fund to ‘procure’ the European Constitution Treaty, divided into two branches:

 

1)             $2.5 billion was allocated (and paid out) on completion of the Inter Governmental Conference [IGC], in July/August of 2004, with $100 million allocated for each of the 25 EU’Member States’. The corrupt bribery funds were remitted to the National officials concerned in Euros.

2)              

 

A further $2.5 billion ($100 million for each ‘Member State’) was payable on ratification of the Collective Treaty.

 

 

Given the negative referendum results delivered by the French and Dutch electorates, payment of the second branch has been a matter of understandable tension and contention ever since, not least since such ‘Black’ remittances, which are common place at the intergovernmental level are illegal -and therefore ‘never happened’.

 

 

Intelligence sources have provided International Currency Review with the NAME of the secret Swiss bank account, the vast amount of ‘Black’ money it holds, the amounts allocated for each corrupted EU ‘Member State’, plus the names of three of the most prominent alleged recipients of ‘Black’ payments, together with details of the alleged transactions concerned.

 

[WE DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK BUT THIS REPORT MUST PUT THE PRO-EUROPE FACTION LITERALLY IN A SPIN AND FEAR OF THE OUTCOME WHEN THE CONSPIRACY IS FULLY REVEALED]

 

We have more to follow

 

*

 

EXPOSURES TRIGGERED BY THE DEATH OF

SIR EDWARD HEATH

also see

These revelations have become possible following the death of Sir Edward Heath, who was a German agent and asset for six decades - the longest known foreign intelligence penetration in modern history.

 

It is significant that the extensive Obituary of Heath published in the Guardian on 18th July 2005, closed with the cryptic sentence:

 

‘He [Heath] remained determined that he would be vindicated, until close to the end.

 

This referred to the fact that when Heath visited Salzburg in 2003, ostensibly to attend the Music Festival there, the real reason for his visit was that he had been summoned to Dachau, where DVD officers warned him that

British intelligence were intending to confront him with his treachery.

 

It is reported that, on hearing this, Heath literally ‘blew a fuse’: he suffered a pulmonary embolism.

 

A similar fate attended the demise of the late Roy (Lord) Jenkins who suffered a severe heart attack when confronted by intelligence officials with the fact that he was about to be exposed for his long-term treachery against the United Kingdom.

 

Roy Jenkins was one of the most lethal of all long-term German agents operating at the highest levels of the British Government.

 

And

-the present allegedly deeply compromised Tony Blair is the late Lord Jenkins’ protégé.

 

Heath, Rippon and Jenkins were far from being the only long-term. High-level foreign penetrations by the DVD-the successor ‘Black’ (continuing Nazi) intelligence organisation to the Abwehr.

 

In the United States, the Dulles brothers were German agents to this day. Substantial transfers of ‘Black’ Operations’ funds originally controlled by the United States authorities are known to have been transferred into the hands of the German ‘Black’ covert intelligence community. The CIA is belatedly being to some extent purged of operators with ethnic and other loyalties and ties to Germany.

 

TENSIONS

EXIST WITHIN INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES BECAUSE OF THIS PENETRATION

*

THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES.

 

Given that

 

(a)   The United Kingdom’s EEC Accession Treaty,

(b)   The Maastricht Treaty of 1992 and

(c)     The (aborted) European Constitution Treaty were among E.U. bilateral and collective Treaties that were procured by corrupt and fraudulent means,

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION IS AN ILLEGAL ORGANISATION.

 

This is because Article 49 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on Treaties, to which Britain and the other EU ‘Member States’ are parties, provides as follows:

‘If a State has been induced to conclude a Treaty by the fraudulent conduct of another negotiating State, that State may invoke the fraud as invalidating its consent to be bound by the Treaty.

[* The first tranche of corrupt payments for the European Constitution Treaty was paid out, but the fate of the second tranche, given the negative French and Dutch referenda outcomes, is uncertain - as well as being the subject of vicious secret controversy]

 

According to intelligence sources, earlier EU Collective treaties were likewise procured by fraudulent means.

 

In the British case, UK Membership of the European Union Collective -an illegal organisation which exists to subsume, usurp and collectivise national sovereignty under the enticing cover of ‘co-operation’ (code for collectivisation)-contravenes the 1689 Bill of Rights which remains the LAW of the United Kingdom to this day and which incorporates the following Oath:

 

‘I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority with this Realm’

*

WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION

 

In addition to exposing the illegality and illegitimacy of the European Union as a whole, International Currency Review [Volume 30, Number 4] demonstrates, with extensive analysis and documentation, that the European Commission is a criminal organisation.

 

The issue has been prepared in close collaboration with Ashley Mote, -Independent MEP for Southeast England, [www.ashleymote.co.uk] and Continental MEP colleagues. In October 2004, Mr Mote and Marta Andreason, the former Chief Accountant of the European Commission, presented the UK Serious Fraud Office with two large lever-arch files containing voluminous damning information about institutionalised corruption in the EU Commission and related EU structures.

 

NO ACTION WAS TAKEN

 

[Does the stink of corruption in high places prevent the Rule of Law from taking place?]

 

Among the reasons for concluding that the European Union is a criminal organisation, are the following:

 

1)         Because successive Presidents of the European Union preside over the disbursement of the corrupt ‘Black’ ‘facilitation fees’ identified, each successive (six-monthly) President is and has been aware of the corrupt mechanism used to procure the EU’s successive collective Treaties.

2)         The incidence of fraud committed within the EU’s structures is so extensive and routine, that the European Commission has been condemned as openly condoning a ‘culture of corruption’, and presiding over a system of ‘institutional looting’. Scandalised EC whistle blowing officials refer to the European Commission as a ‘festering dustbin of corruption’. In 2004, there were nearly 3,500 cases of EC fraud.

3)         When informed in 2004 that the EC Vice - President-designate, Jacques Barrot, had been convicted for embezzlement of funds, and had withheld this information from the European Commission’s President-designate, Sr. Jose-Manuel Barroso, the new President denied any prior knowledge of this fact, and left Barrot in place.

4)         It is nothing unusual for European Commission officials to be associated with lucrative corrupt ‘side businesses’-often using offshore accounts-from which they benefit financially, consequent upon contracts being awarded to the businesses in which they themselves have a secret pecuniary interest. For instance:

5)         The Sunday Telegraph reported on 25th September -2005 that two EC employees own a Brussels sex hotel, Studio Europe, which rents out rooms for 13 euros an hour. No doubt this location is used for blackmail purposes. The EC officials in question were named as Carmela lo Guidance, an assistant in the EC Budget Directorate-General and George Tizzies a porter in the Directorate-General responsible for employment. This is the latest of innumerable EC scandals to have erupted into the public domain, some of which are examined in the Special Issue [out on Monday 10th October 2005.]

6)         Unhealthy and evidently pervasive masonic links exist between European Commission officials and contractors, resulting in corrupt and unhealthy ‘business relationships’.

7)    The European Commission’s accounting is NOT only shambolic, but also fraudulent. Evidence to this effect is presented, inter alia, by the well-known British forensic accountant Christopher Arkell, FTCA, and by former Chief Accountant of the European Commission, Marta Andreason. She was ‘suspended’ after five months en poste, and then fired, after she questioned the legitimacy of payments that Directorates-General required her to authorise. She asked awkward questions, and was effectively told to ‘shut up and just sign’.

8)    The EC’s accounting irregularities, which are glaring, include the following abuses: When certain accounting modifications were implemented at the end of 2004, the closing balances in 2004 and the opening balances in 2005 were not reconciled- thereby permanently embedding false accounting data for the future. This means that henceforth no European Commission accounts can ever be accurate (not that this has ever been the case).

 

Even though EU ‘Member States’ have been making payments to the Commission for decades to cover the costs of pension liabilities for approximately 39,000 EC employees (as of 2005), the EU ‘Member States’ have simultaneously been charged with the liability of making/guaranteeing the resulting pension payments. Thus pension liabilities appear on both sides of the balance sheet. Proper accounting practice would require a charge to the Income and Expenditure Account of

 

EUR 19.5 billion

 

And a consequent reduction in reserves.

 

The European Commission should have been acquiring a liability for pensions throughout its existence instead of fudging the accounts in this fraudulent and irregular manner.

The European Commission ‘makes’ massive surpluses out of the ‘Member States’ annually, which it covers up

 

Surpluses are supposed according to the EU’s own regulations, to be returned to the ‘Member States’. What happens in practice is that the EC surpluses that have arisen after all accruals have been accounted for, are eliminated by the simple manipulative expedient of providing for potential expenditures not openly through the Income and Expenditure Account, but by means of corrupt adjustments to the Balance Sheet (‘Provisions’).

 

This method of accounting is prohibited by all recognised accounting standards around the world as DISHONEST.

 

Its use by the European Commission represents a clear fraud perpetuated upon ‘Member States’ and their troubled and exploited peoples.

 EC accounting records can be changed two or more years in arrears. The amount and the payee, but not the unique identifying number, can be altered, and no record whatsoever of such changes is/has been maintained in the records. This represents an open-ended invitation to scam the system, especially as it is routine for the EC’s Annual Accounts to be adjusted retrospectively.

 

The huge Eurocracy (or self-interested EU nomenklatura) has perfected subtle mechanisms for ensuring that hardly anything is ever done to stamp out the corruption over which it has presided for decades. These techniques include, but are not confined to the following:

 

 The use of ‘candour’,

 

which is NOT to be confused with the truth. ‘Candour’ is deployed in order to disarm, mislead, divert and mollify critics, so that any underlying fraud goes undetected.

 

The ‘multiple investigations’ technique

 

8.2) What happens is that several investigations are ‘opened’ separately. Further internal ‘investigations’ may follow. Some are then ‘closed’, or ‘suspended’, ostensibly ‘pending’ the ‘results’ of other investigations.

The resulting, deliberately contrived, confusion, with successive reports contradicting others, ensures that the corruption trail is buried and lost.

 

Report-writing is used to smother transparency, clarity, and TRUTH, with the sole objective of obfuscating the underlying looting and corruption.

 

8.3) The EC and its structures have at least 3,094 secret ‘working groups’ or committees, all of which are answerable to no-one, and the operations of which are secret.

 

8.4)             The main objective of any EC fraud investigation is to procure that the case is ‘exported’ as quickly as possible to the ‘Member States’ concerned, so that any corruption at the EC centre is consequently hidden from scrutiny.

8.5)             Wherever possible, investigations are kept unresolved until the existing Commission is duly replaced by its successor-when the ‘that was then, this is now’ excuse kicks in.

8.6)             Innumerable other deliberate obstruction methods, identified by International Currency Review with the guidance of Ashley Mote MEP and his colleagues, are routinely employed by the EC and related structures, to maximise the obfuscation of troubling problems.

 

For instance, one external corporation, based in Luxembourg, in which EC officials had an interest, was ostensibly established on 29th February 1989-a date which never even existed, which meant that the entity was ‘invisible’.

 

When a sanitised official report on the entity’s fraudulent activities was presented to the former President of the European Commission, Signor Romano Prodi - that allegedly corrupt Italian ‘machine’ politician- the date was altered to 22nd February 1989.

 

This further illustrated the devious standard European Commission technique of promulgating conflicting information in separate contradictory reports. By this means, controversy is deflected into sterile arguments over the conflicting information-diverting attention from the institutionalised internal looting itself.

 

8.7)             The European Court of Auditors has given an adverse opinion for many years, on 95% of all European Commission Expenditure.

It has never, ever, approved the EC’s accounts.

 

Furthermore evidence has surfaced of fraud in the Court’s own accounts -one of several indications that the Court itself cannot be trusted. Indeed, like the Commission’s own internal Audit Service, its main task, by open official admission, is to minimise embarrassment to the Commission.

 

The damning evidence of institutionalised European Commission looting and serial corruption covered up by the EC authorities contained in the single issue of International Currency Review is sufficient to induce a terminal crisis at the European Commission.

 

*

WHY BRITISH PAYMENTS TO THE EC MUST CEASE FORTHWITH.

 

Both Ashley Mote MEP and the journal’s Editor, Christopher Story, demand that the UK Treasury sits up, finally takes notice, and withholds further contributions to the EC budget pending elimination of institutionalised corruption and looting in the European Commission’s structures -which will never happen.

 

In a letter to Ashley Mote dated 22nd October 2004, Stephen Timms, the Treasury Minister, told the MEP that withholding British payments to the EC would be illegal and would be an ‘option’ we would not consider’

 

BUT

 

Continued squandering of UK Taxpayers (OUR MONEY) represents a dereliction by British Ministers and their officials, of their duty of care towards UK taxpayer’s funds.

Given the conspicuous gravity of the situation, Ministers are believed to be increasing the risk of being sued for negligence as exposures of the European Commission’s ‘culture of corruption’ proliferate.

 

[At this moment in Time in the UK millions of people on tax-credits who were overpaid because of technical problems are being asked to hand the money back. They should ALL insist that the Treasury should try the European Commission and ask their employees to point the finger and explain were the billions of pounds of OUR money is resting in banks in Switzerland. WE should certainly have a great deal of compound interest to collect at the same time]

 

Moreover the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Lawson of Blaby, has advised the House of Lords’ European Committee that the British Government DOES possess the legal scope to give itself powers to withhold payments to the European Commission.

 

He told the Committee:

 

‘You have to remember how hard it was to win the (UK) rebate…It would never have happened if we had not made clear that if we did not get satisfaction, we would withhold our contributions.

It was never published, but it was printed. It was discreetly known to those who we negotiated with, that this is what would happen if we did not get satisfaction….Without that threat to withhold our contributions, to the extent of having the UK law officers produce a bill, we would have NOT got [the Rebate].’

 

[Source: Future Financing of the European Union, House of Lords European Committee, HL Paper 62, 9th March 2005.]

 

But since Britain’s EU membership is illegal, because the UK Accession Treaty and successive EU Collective Treaties (notably Maastricht) were procured by fraud, it is not even technically necessary for the Government to extract that draft bill from the official pigeon-hole into which it was shoved.

*

BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION TOMORROW: NO PROBLEM.

 

The Government can walk away from the European Union Tomorrow- and use the 25% of gross Domestic Product represented by all current and future costs of the EU membership:

 

To rebuild the Public Transportation system.

 

Build spanking new ‘Schools and Hospitals’ wherever demand exists.

 

And revitalise the BRITISH economy generally.

 

All without suffering any losses since EU membership has brought Britain no clear benefits at all, that could not have been procured domestically. It has however, meant that billions of UK taxpayers’ funds that the British Government should have been spending at home, have been squandered on this sterile, decaying collectivist project, led by corrupted and blackmailed politicians and operatives.

 

All EU ‘Member States’, valuing the huge British market for their goods, would be compelled to negotiate arms’-length bilateral trade and other agreements with the United Kingdom, or risk losing access to UK markets. Any prospective interim disruptions could be accommodated by the British Government directing the UK taxpayers’ funds that it normally squanders with the EC’s ‘festering dustbin of corruption’, into temporarily vulnerable sectors of the UK economy.

 

A Free Trade Agreement linking Britain, the United States and Canada has bee readied, for implementation when Britain leaves the European Community.

 

For, contrary to what is in the public domain, contingency plans do exist in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union.

 

These were recently reviewed and ‘dusted down’, in the context of key connections made by certain intelligence circles following the 7/7 attacks, which have shown that EU Member States’ that profess to be allies of the United Kingdom are anything but.

 

Exposure information for this special issue of International Currency Review

[Vol.30, No4] has been developed with the generous practical assistance of Ashley Mote MEP. Paul van Buitenen MEP, Marta Andreason, Christopher Arkle FTCA and the US and UK intelligence sources special to the Editor, Christopher Story.

 

For further details, see Ashley Mote’s website: www.ashleymote.co.uk.

 

 

International Currency Review, VOL. 30 NO 4 [extracts from 153 pages -shown above], available by subscription from www.worldreports.org. was mailed to paying subscribers worldwide on

 

10th October 2005

 

Banks, Corporations and other entities that use subscription agencies may subscribe to World Reports Ltd serials (complete) through their usual channels, or else direct from our website, or from the London or New York addresses shown in the lower red panel on the

 

www.worldreports.org Home Page. The website has a secure and reliable subscription ordering system.

 

ABOUT INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

 

International Currency Review is the only INDEPENDENT global journal specialising in international currency, financial and economic issues with a geopolitical and intelligence dimension.

 

Published since 1969, it specialises today in exposing corruption in governance structures, since the corruption of governance and of the capitalist system is swamping all other considerations.

 

The Journal is one of a series of intelligence sources published by World Reports, details of which will be found on our website:

 

www.worldreports.org

 

International Currency Review has recently exposed the basis of the ‘Upper Echelon’global financial structure, which sustains the ‘Lower Echelon’ structure with which we are all familiar.

 

The ‘Upper Echelon’ is a ‘closed’ intergovernmental and intelligence financial environment characterised by high -yield investment programmes, scamming operations and colossal stored fiat wealth running into trillions of dollars

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

* * *

OCTOBER 10-2005

Also

 

AVAILABLE SOON

 

THE NEW UNDERWORLD ORDER

 

*Published by: EDWARD HARLE LTD

(Source of ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books.

108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, LONDON SW1P 2EF

Orders@edwardharle.com . Tel-Orderline +44 [0207-222-2635

OCTOBER-2005

*

[AFTER MANY YEARS  RELENTLESSLY REVEALING THE CORRUPTION IN THE EU AND ELSEWHERE CHRISTOPHER STORY SUCCUMBED TO ILLNESS AND DIED IN 2010.IT IS CONSIDERED THAT HE WAS IN FACT ASSASSINATED BECAUSE OF HIS UNFAILING RESOLVE to seek out THE TRUTH!]

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE-ENEMY OF

 ITS MEMBER STATES

 BY CHRISTOPHER STORY -


 THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE-ENEMY OF ITS MEMBER STATES BY

CHRISTOPHER STORY

-PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

  

 

Christopher Story Assassination (Edward Harle working under the ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6A_VpB2u_o25 Apr 2011 - 15 min - Uploaded by usellcom
 

Prominent veteran financial journalist Edward Harle (working under the pen name

Christopher Story...

 

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

H.F.1376

 
 


 
 

[HOW IT BEGAN]

 

 

PETITION TO HM THE QUEEN

PETITION TO PARLIAMENT

 

PRINCIPLES OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION

 

1.  The British Constitution and Rule of Law are paramount and must be invariably upheld by all who bear allegiance to the Crown.

2.  No one is above the law.

3.  The authority of the Crown and Parliament is limited by the British Constitution

4.  No Government or Parliament has authority to;

a.   Place the Sovereign in breach of Her Coronation Oath and contract to rule according to our law and custom.

b.  Transfer British sovereignty to a foreign power that claims primacy over us.

5.  The Sovereign has power to refuse Royal Assent to any legislation that threatens, diminishes or surrenders the people’s sovereignty, their rights, liberties, customs and independence.

6.  The Sovereign has power to dissolve Parliament and call elections.

7.  The people have a right to petition the Sovereign and/or Parliament to obtain remedy and preserve the rule of law.

8.  In the event of failure by the Sovereign and/or Parliament to provide remedy to genuine grievance, or in the event of unlawful governance or legislation the people may withhold allegiance until a remedy has been secured.

 

 

DEFENDERS OF THE REALM

The New Battle For Britain

Southbank House, Black Prince Road, London SE1 7SJ

Tel. 0297 793 4049  Fax. 0207 463 2008

 

EURO-CONSTITUTION DUE TO BE IMPOSED

ON

JUNE 13TH 2004

 

     DO YOU KNOW THIS WILL SPELL THE END OF UK SELF – GOVERNMENT, THE MONARCHY AND OUR INDEPENDENCE?

  • DO YOU KNOW YOU ARE BEING DISENFRANCHISED AND BETRAYED BY OUR POLITICIANS?
  • DO YOU KNOW THAT YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR THE 2000 BILLION POUND PENSION DEFICIT IN EU COUNTRIES? THAT’S ON TOP OF OUR OWN 380 BILLION POUND DEFICIT.
  • ARE YOU WORRIED ABOUT OVERCROWDED SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS, TRAFFIC CONGESTION?  BUT DO YOU KNOW BY NEXT JUNE, 73 MILLION MORE EU CITIZENS WILL BE ELIGIBLE TO COME TO BRITAIN AND DRAW BENEFITS OR TAKE BRITISH JOBS?
  • DO YOU KNOW THIS EU-CON-STITUTION IS UNLAWFUL UNDER UK LAW
  • DO YOU KNOW YOU CAN HELP TO STOP THIS NONSENSE IF ENOUGH PEOPLE REFUSE TO ACCEPT UNLAWFUL DEMANDS?
  • IF YOU CARE ABOUT OUR COUNTRY’S FREEDOM, WILL YOU HELP DEFEND OUR RIGHTS & LIBERTIES AND INSIST THAT OUR OWN CONSTITUTION IS UPHELD? 
  •       THEN SUPPORT THE DEFENDERS OF THE REALM

 

Please contact us without delay for further information- we urgently need volunteers throughout the country to help raise funds, promote a national petition to the Queen and stand up for Britain.

 

Vice Presidents: Lord Morris, Edward Fox OBE, Norris Mcwhirter CBE, Chairman: John Gouriet. Directors: Robin de Crittenden, Roy Faiers- Treasurer, C.J.K. Arkell FTCA, Frederick Forsythe CBE, Legal Advisor: John Bingley.

EURO-CONSTITUTION DUE TO BE IMPOSED

ON

JUNE 13TH 2004

 

H.F.700/1

 

Monday's Daily Mail-October 3,2016

 

 

 

 

In historic speech, PM says she WILL trigger Brexit by next MARCH 2019... vows to control borders.... and slams Remainers 'subverting democracy':

 

 

 

 THIS LADY'S NOT FOR TURNING!

 

By James Slack-Political Editor

 

 

 

 

THERESA May has sent an emphatic message to bitter Remainers that she WILL deliver a full-blooded Brexit by early 2019.

Making her first Tory conference speech as Prime Minister yesterday, she vowed to restore CONTROL over BRITAIN'S BORDERS and make the

NATION

SOVEREIGN AGAIN.

In the clearest hint yet of a clean break from the

SINGLE MARKET

she insisted the UK

 WOULD END FREE MOVEMENT

of

EU WORKERS

DETERMINE

ITS OWN LAWS

AND BECOME A

GLOBAL TRADE GIANT

And in an attack on some of her senior MPs she told  the country to ignore

'PESSIMISTS'...

Full article

 

*  *  *

[ WE WOULD CONSIDER THEM TRAITORS -IT IS FORTUNATE FOR THEM THAT TREASON HAS BEEN IGNORED SINCE THE PASSING OF THE 1972 ACCESSION TREATY. BUT IF THEY COULD BE BROUGHT TO TRIAL THEY WOULD NOT SUFFER THE DEATH BY HANGING WHICH THEY ALL DESERVE BECAUSE TONY BLAIR CHANGED THE LAW  IN 1998 BY PASSING A BILL LATE AT NIGHT TO REDUCE THE SENTENCE FOR TREASON TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT. THOSE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE THAT ARE SO PROUD OF THEIR TREACHERY ARE LUCKY THAT  WE HAD A REFERENDUM INSTEAD OF A REVOLUTION BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE SOON LEARNT WHAT WOULD BECOME OF THEM IF THE SPIRIT OF CROMWELL AGAIN VISITED OUR DIVIDED LAND. THEY HAVE SHOWN  THEIR ARROGANCE BY REFUSING TO ACCEPT THE DEMOCRATIC DECISION OF THE PEOPLE AND SHOULD REALIZE HOW FORTUNATE THEY ARE- SHUT THEIR MOUTHS- AND COOPERATE WITH THE GOVERNMENT TO OBTAIN THE RETURN OF OUR WORLD RENOWNED UNIQUE PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY  WITHIN A FREE -INDEPENDENT NATION STATE, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

THOSE TRAITORS IF THEY ARE SO FOND OF THE EU HAVE A CHOICE OF 27 COUNTRIES FOR THEM TO MOVE TO BUT EVEN IN THOSE COUNTRIES THEY MAY NOT WANT TO HAVE TRAITORS FROM THE UK AS IT MIGHT AFFECT THEIR TRADING ARRANGEMENT WHEN WE AGAIN SHOW THE WORLD WHO WE WERE AND INTEND TO BE AS OF OLD WITH THE WORLD OUR OYSTER AS IT HAD BEEN BEFORE THE MANY TRAITORS SURFACED OVER 60 YEARS AGO.]

WE ALL KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO A LABOUR MP DURING THE REFERENDUM WHOSE MURDER WAS A SHOCKING EXAMPLE OF HOW VULNERABLE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT CAN BE AND WE CAN ONLY PRAY THAT OUR PATRIOTIC PRIME MINISTER IS GUARDED 24 HRS A DAY, BECAUSE THERE ARE MANY AT HOME WHO HAVE BETRAYED THEIR COUNTRY AND FEEL NO QUALMS ABOUT IT.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

BREXIT BY MARCH 2017

 

IN DECEMBER 2018 WE ASK THE QUESTION -WILL SHE DO WHAT SHE PROMISED BACK IN  JUNE 2016?

 

TREACHERY.-

 

 

Of all the vices to which human nature is subject, treachery is the most infamous and detestable, being compounded of fraud, cowardice, and revenge. The greatest wrongs will not justify it, as it destroys those principles of mutual confidence and security by which only society can subsist.

L.M Stretch Eng,Rel.writer

 

 

Treason

'The man was noble; but with his last attempt he wiped it out; betrayed his country; and his name remains to the ensuing age abhored'- Shakespeare

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence.'- Edmund Burke

A traitor is good fruit to hang from the boughs of the tree of liberty

H.W. Beecher

 

 

H.F.992 BREXIT  BY MARCH 2016

 

Sajid Javid slams grooming gang as 'sick Asian ..by Daniel Martin -policy Editor. - Daily Mail

 

 

DECEMBER 27,2018

 

SAJID Javid has vigorously defended highlighting the ethnicity of paedophile grooming gangs - arguing that ignoring

[ingrained POLITICAL CORRECTNESS]

it would give a boost to extremists.

The Home Secretary said he  took the Rochdale grooming scandal personally because it involved his home town and men who were from a Pakistani background like him.

 He defended the Government's decision to strip some members of the gang of their British  citizenship, insisting his job was to keep the British public safe even if it meant offenders being sent  to a country where they may face fewer checks on their actions. Mr Javid insisted he was right to send a controversial tweet in October condemning 'sick Asian paedophiles' convicted for grooming in the Huddersfield area.

The  Home Secretary was born in Rochdale, one of a series of towns where members of the grooming gangs target young girls.

Asked if that meant he took it more personally, Mr Javid told the BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'Sometimes I have, yes. Especially with reference to Rochdale, because it is my own town. I still go there now and again, because I have family there that I care about

When I heard about -and there has been more than one case-grooming gangs were almost every individual involved  is of Pakistan heritage -I can't help noting the fact that Rochdale is a town that means something to me and I am also of Pakistan heritage.

He added: I think it would be true of any that if they heard about something-in this case bad-connected to a town that was something special to them, naturally that would be a thought in their mind.

[While the politically correct indoctrinated Local Authority - Police and Care - looked the other way .]

'But in terms of a response, what matters is first of all, the law enforcement response which rightly is completely independent of government ministers.'

Mr Javid also defended  Government action to strip offenders of their British citizenship

 [This is precisely what should happen to MUSLIM EXTREMISTS who take up arms against our country.]

Asked if he was concerned about the possible lack of control over paedophiles if they returned to Pakistan, Mr Javid insisted: 'My job is to protect the British public and do what I think is right to

PROTECT THE BRITISH PUBLIC.

In August, the Court of Appeal upheld a decision to strip three members of a Rochdale grooming gang of their British Citizenship.

Abdul Aziz, Adil Khan and Qari Abdul Rauf were among nine men jailed in May 2012 after found guilty of grooming and sexually exploiting girls as young as 13.

Mr Javid also stressed the need to acknowledge the background of the grooming gangs.

Responding to criticism of his Twitter message about the Huddersfield gang, he told Today:

'When it comes to gang-based child exploitation it is self-evident to anyone who cares to look that if you look at all the recent high profile cases there is a high proportion of men that are of Pakistan heritage.'

'For me to rule something out just because it would be considered sensitive would be wrong.'

Mr Javid said.'If I had ignored it, or been seen to ignore it, that is exactly what i think extremists would like to see in this country.'

[Were sure that the majority  the SANE and unpolitically -correct population in BRITAIN agrees with him.

[TELL TODAY ITS TOMORROW.]

Sajid Javid slams grooming gang as 'sick Asian ..by Daniel Martin -policy Editor. - Daily Mail

 

 

DECEMBER 27,2018

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1768
 

 

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 
 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

      9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA
LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND
SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND
100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

 THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 
  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
    •
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BritAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro

By James Slack Political Editor For The Daily Mail



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

Brexit will let us rediscover role as trading power | Daily Mail Online

Theresa May's Brexit speech puts Cameron to shame | Daily Mail ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Commons and Lords get ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Full reports and analysis

 

A great nation is reborn: Quitting will let us rediscover our role as a ...

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.
 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

  WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

  WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

  WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

  

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

 *		 7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

  WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

  WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW
 
 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 
Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

[A MATTER OF FACT!]

[A LIBERAL PEER SHOULD REMEMBER]
Did you know there is a worldwide semi-secret war against white people. It started in 1923, in every country that has mostly white people, or used to have mostly white people, they are immigrating people from other races as fast as they can get away with it. They are encouraging whites to marry someone from a different race. They are also lowering the financial conditions so that the whites that do marry and used to do well, don’t want to have children or not many, because of financial conditions.
 

The white people on Earth came from Mars and were quickly genetically changed by the 8th Density about 66,000 years ago so they can mate with any Human and Earth would have one people. This was done so we would all get along better and one race wouldn’t become dominant wipe out the other races that moved here. The black Africans started here and so far 5 other races immigrated here and the whites were 2nd last, the Oriental Asians were last about 63,000 years ago and the 8th Density treated them the same, it wasn’t the Andromeda Council, like I was told last week.
 

White people are unique, we are the only ones who commonly have different eye and hair color and on average are less evil and more spiritual than the other races, except about the same as the Oriental Asians, but this has a little bit to do with the living conditions the last 300 years, all races have good & bad people. It is commonly said in the main stream media that the whites are an evil race and want to go to war with everyone, after all they pretty much wiped out the natives in North and South America and then brought slaves here.
Well this isn’t quite right, Columbus, Cortez and Pizarro were all Illuminati and didn’t have Human souls, they had the Reptilian lower soul, with little empathy for others.

The slaves were bought here on Jewish ships, most of the Jewish ship owners were Illuminati also. There were also white slaves (mostly Irish) and about 7,000 black slave owners in the USA. Less than 1 in 1,000 white people owned slaves and were constantly programmed that blacks were inferior from authorities, so the non slave owning whites would accept it.

The non slave owning Whites hated slavery, because they were forced by law to help capture run away slaves with no compensation and it was extremely hard to get a high paying job, with slaves doing a lot of work for free.

All the wars are started by and run by the Illuminati and Elite Jews. To many Whites are brainwashed to go along with the program, by the main stream media Which is all owned by the Jews or Illuminati.
 

Are you getting the picture, stop reading for a few seconds and see if you can figure it out. If there is no spiritual revolution, the brown dwarf star doesn’t come near the sun and damage Earth and the Illuminati and Elite Jews win, everyone else will become a worker/slaves. Whites won’t be allowed to marry or if they do they won’t be allowed to have children or if they do the paedophiles will take them. The only whites will be Illuminati or Jews and they will be in the ruling class, unelected and can’t be taken out of power.

 If you don’t want this future wake people up and help the spiritual revolution happen, become more spiritual. I think it’s going to happen and it’s called the Golden Age, it’s a wake up and win situation, but I think we’re going to get some wake up help. Even if your not White don’t accept that Whites should be wiped out, I certainly wouldn’t accept that Blacks should be wiped out or any other race. The only people I would accept being wiped out is the super evil ones. There will be a delightful place for everyone of every race in the Golden Age.
http://www.icheckyoursoul.com/

H.F.1424/2

  

 
 

Illuminati

The story starts about 45,000 years ago. There was a planet in an orbit closer to the sun than Jupiter. Many call this planet Maldek, Mars was it’s largest moon. The Reptilian people that lived there were very violent and negative. They went to war with the people that lived on Mars. They were greater in number, but the Martians had better technology. These people refused to quit attacking the peaceful Martians. So the Martians devised a plan to seriously damage Maldek, making it impossible for these people to stay there and get the war over. The weapon they used, turned out to be to strong and blew up Maldek, scattering pieces all over our solar system, making the asteroid belt, new moons for some of the outer planets and comets in the far reaches of our solar system.

About 8,000 of these Reptilian people were in large space ships and survived. So they decided to go live in our moon and kick out the few Draconians that lived there. The Reptilians (Draconians) soon returned in force. So they had to leave in a hurry, while their ships were being blasted and crash landed in Antarctica, which at that time was in a tropical area. Now they soon no longer had space flight, because of the Draconian continued attacks. They had trouble living on Earth as their bodies didn’t agree with Earth’s elements. Humanity had just came out of cataclysms caused by Maldek blowing up, so they were few in number and lost their technology and now were sort of primitive.

These people captured some Humans and using genetics made hybrids of themselves, so they could live on Earth. They made 2 kinds of hybrids, one kind was very similar to and could mate with Humanity. The other kind was different and had elongated heads and became the ruling class and could not mate with Humanity. There are still some of these left, although they stay secret. Within 2,000 years the brown dwarf star, came through our solar system as it does every 3,557 years. Earth was hit hard and had a devastating pole shift, making the south pole in about the center of Antarctica as it is today.

Most all of the people on Earth died as there was a flash freeze in the new polar areas, killing a lot of animals too. So the Reptilian-Mammal hybrid people that were similar to Humanity lived with and bred with Humanity. When one of their females had children, the children would get one of their souls, regardless of who the father is. These people, the Illuminati today can tell each other apart from Humanity, but Humanity can’t seem to tell that they have different souls. They arranged to put each other into positions of power, like kings and queens and still hold these positions today. Although with the invention of the internet and spreading of knowledge, they are starting to lose control.

With them in power, we have war, central banks, shortages and other forms of suffering. Because of them we live in a negative world. In 2021 our 3rd cycle will finish and positive soul groups get to move up to the 2nd realm, 5th dimension (4th density). We are in the 1st realm, 4th dimension (3rd density) now. So we must get the Illuminati out of power and turn positive, to move up to 4th density. A soul can either go through 1 cycle of 3rd or 4th density (or some of both) and make ascension to 5th density (12th dimension on Earth). If we get in 4th density life improves, our bodies will be a little better and matter a little different, the biggest change is another component of time. Many of us will gain some telepathy and see a wider range of the spectrum and other improvements.

 

FEBRUARY 5-2016

H.F.1424/2S
 
 

 

HOW TO DESTROY A NATION STATE FROM WITHIN!

Austrian intelligence says US organizations are funding immigration into Europe

by Steve Goode • August 16, 2015

An anonymous employee from the Austrian Defense Office, which is operated by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Defense, says that some groups in the USA are paying smugglers to get more African and Middle Eastern immigrants into Europe.

“Traffickers demand exorbitant sums to bring refugees to Europe illegally. The conditions are often very poor, but still a transport does currently cost 7000-14000 Euro…” the Austrian Defense Office employee told Info-Direkt.at.

“There are insights that organizations from the US have created a co-financing model and contribute substantial amounts to trafficker’s costs.”

“Not every refugee from North Africa has 11,000 euros in cash. Nobody asks where the money comes from.”

The employee said that there was a “strict news blackout” on how the African and Middle Eastern immigrants were able to pay the traffickers fees.

If this is true, then it means various anti-White groups have resorted to paying for non-White illegal immigrants, instead of legal ones, all so they can make White Europeans a vanishing minority.

While these anti-Whites claim to be building “diverse” societies, it seems highly suspicious that ONLY White countries are targeted to

become

“diverse”.

http://whitegenocideproject.com/austrian-intelligence-says-us-organizations-are-funding-immigration-into-europe/

 

Comment by intruth on September 8, 2015 @ 1:52 am

 

*

 

 

[ WE HAVE NEVER UNDERSTOOD UNTIL NOW HOW SO MANY REFUGEES HAD FUNDS TO JOIN THE EXODUS TO EUROPE-THE ABOVE  WOULD APPEAR TO BE A LOGICAL AND SINISTER CABAL PLOT.]

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

*

http://sitsshow.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/benjamin-fulford-september-7th-2015.html

H. F.1734
 
 

 

 
Judge:

Free Press is our birthright.

By  Rebecca Camber

 DAILY MAIL - Crime correspondent
 

A FORMER Lord Chief Justice described the Press as a 'constitutional necessity' yesterday as he warned about the erosion of court reporting.

Igor Judge, head of the judiciary from 2008 to 2013, said liberty of the Press was a

'birthright of every citizen'

but warned newspapers will not survive on

'charity and goodwill'.

Expressing his 'unequivocal and wholehearted support for the industry, he said action must be taken to

Safeguard the future of the Press.

Lord Judge spoke at a seminar hosted by the Society of Editors into the state of court reporting which has declined nationally by around

40 per cent in recent years

He said:

'In a country governed by the

RULE OF LAW

the independence of the Press is a constitutional necessity.

The peer added; 

"The liberty of the Press is the birthright of the Briton, and is justly esteemed the firmest bulwark of the liberties of this country."

- so said John Wilks in 1762

and the statement still carries an echoing resonance.

'The liberty of the Press is the birthright of every citizen, that is the community as a whole... I am not sure this principle is sufficiently understood. The better it is understood the more every citizen would be dedicated to upholding it.'

Lord Judge spoke out as MPs are due to vote in the next couple of months on tighter media controls which the Prime Minister has warned will undermine a

FREE PRESS .

He said: 'If we do not buy our newspapers, we cannot expect them to survive on

GOOD WILL and CHARITY...

It looks as though something of a crunch is coming.

'The print media is no longer prosperous...that is to the detriment of the community they serve.'

Former culture secretary John Whittingdale suggested social media giants should subsidise court recording as thre already use content from local newspapers.

The Tory Mp said Google and Facebook' are the bigest providers of news yet they don't employ a single reporter-what they do is take content which is produced by journalists working across the media... so my view it is very much in the interests of Google and Facebook to support local journalism.'

*  *  *

'Let it be impressed upon your minds, let it be instilled into your children, that the liberty of the press is the palladium of all the civil., political, and religious rights.'-

Junius. (Unknown political write.)

The press is not only free, it is powerful. That power is ours. It is the proudest that man can enjoy. It was not granted by monarchs; it was not gained for us by aristocracies; but it sprang from the people, and, with an immortal instinct, it has always worked for the people.-

DISRAELI, Benjamin.

An enslaved press is doubly fatal; it not only takes away the true light, for in that case we might stand still, but it sets up a false one that decoys us to our destruction.-

COLTON, Calab

*

[IT is no surprise that so many members of Parliament wish to destroy our FREE PRESS or even CONTROL IT! when one considers how many members have been exposed as LIARS and CHEATS ,and THIEVES of the PUBLIC PURSE-No wonder they want their REVENGE because the FREE PRESS was TOO FREE for their liking.']

*  *  *

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JANUARY 19,2018

H.F.1453
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 
 

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.
 
 
 
 
 
 

HOME

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM? THAT IS YOUR CHOICE

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-June 27,2008]

DEMOCRACY and freedom. It is a fine sounding phrase-rarely off the lips of President Bush as he blunders around the Middle East.

Why do we readily accept that democracy and freedom are natural partners? There is scant historical evidence for it. Often it is a case of

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM: even DEMOCRACY versus FREEDOM.

Consider two examples.  the United States is the only country to have banned alcohol by public demand. Contrast this with Hong Kong. Until shortly before being handed back by

BRITAIN to BEIJING

 it had

NO DEMOCRACY

at all: It was ruled by a colonial governor. Yet enjoyed enviable freedom with one of the least intrusive governments -and flourished wonderfully.

Our own experience also has much to tell us.

BEING A DEMOCRACY HAS NOT PROMOTED PERSONAL LIBERTY.

QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

More than

3000

 NEW OFFENCES

have been created since 1997, and officialdom revels in nearly

300 POWERS OF ENTRY.

Much of this is due to the

EUROPEAN UNION

whose

DIRECTIVES

are rarely scrutinised, let alone debated , by our supposedly democratic representatives.

WHAT we may SAY, WRITE or DO, or whom WE EMPLOY has been increasingly limited. The Government has passed legislation which can make assisting your son's football team

AN OFFENCE.

Another side of our

'democracy'

demonstrates painfully how the public will is constantly flouted. Take the brazen example of voters being

PROMISED REFERENDUM

on

CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

resulting from the

LISBON TREATY

The unscrupulous machinery of government has been deployed to

FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC WILL.

I am not making a party point.

FOR OVER 40 YEARS, GOVERNMENTS OF BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN RESISTING AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC DEMAND FOR CURBS ON

IMMIGRATION.

especially from the

NEW COMMONWEALTH.

 While successive governments have made a show of meeting public demand, they have, quite consciously

REFUSED TO ADDRESS IT

throwing occasional tit-bits to the voters in the hope

THAT THIS WILL KEEP THEM QUIET.

Consider, also, the strong public demand for

CRIMINALS TO BE PROPERLY PUNISHED.

Successive governments, including Mrs Thatcher's have come under the sway of the

'PRISON REFORM'

people -with the result that

CRIMINALS RECEIVE VERY MODEST SENTENCES.

What is more, if they serve a sentence at all, it is in the softest conditions.

IF LYING ON YOUR BED AND WATCHING TV FOR A FEW MONTHS IS THE WORST THAT THE LAW WILL INFLICT

(and that's if you are even caught)

then

CRIME IS WORTH THE RISK

AND

PUBLIC OUTRAGE IS IGNORED.

The explanation is quite logical. Politicians are typically driven by

TWO THINGS.

THE FIRST is the PURSUIT OF POWER

the most exciting thing in the world, or even some say, the first.  If this urge is not there when they start their political careers

THEN IT SOON TAKES OVER.

THEIR SECOND MOTIVATION -to give our politicians their due - is the DESIRE FOR REFORM, IMPROVE the condition of the PEOPLE.

But the catch here is that most politicians

 THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE FAR BETTER THAN THEMSELVES.

THEY FORM AN ELITE

WHICH LISTENS TO

OTHER ELITES

Or perhaps, since the word elite sounds flattering, we should say

THEY FORM A CASTE.

 

Politicians do not wake each morning wondering whether they are meeting the public will.  They turn to the media to learn what is said about them in newspapers and on the radio by other members of the

NATIONAL ELITE

- the selectorate, the clattering classes, the scribblers, the intellectually fashionable, call them what you will.

 

For elites to be out of touch is not unusual, even inevitable. The desire to be 'in' with the 'right' people is common with politicians; their weakness is for approval (and fame).

Of course, there is one moment when public opinion cannot be ignored -and that is at an

ELECTION

As Rousseau observed, voters are truly free

ONLY

 ON

ELECTION DAY.

But , by then, all the issues are jumbled up, and the voter finds himself choosing between

TWO COMPLEX and CONFUSING MENUS.

And while it is clearly advantageous for a party to offer the public

WHAT IT WANTS, the fact that both main parties say MUCH THE SAME THING..

-and make similar insincere

PROMISES

makes a mockery of any claim to be driven by

PUBLIC WILL.

 

BUT  the ALTERNATIVE to our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM politicians say in horror, would be GOVERNMENT by REFERENDUMS. With 'horror' because it would take power from THEM and give it to THE PEOPLE.

BUT WHY NOT?

The Swiss have made a suburb success of it. Referendums are required on national and local issues if enough voters petition for them and they often do. As a result, the Federal Government, like  the local CANTON administrations, proceeds with CAUTION in case its plans are overturned by a PUBLIC VOTE. . .

To acknowledge that our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, which has developed over the centuries, NO LONGER WORKS -MAY BE PAINFUL. But if you put that to a REFERENDUM,

MOST VOTERS WOULD HEARTILY AGREE.

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

 *

HOME

[brought forward from June-2008

AUGUST-2008

*

[ 'IN JANUARY 2018 we can look back over 10 years and see that the situation with regard to many matters mentioned above has got progressively WORSE! Whether it is IMMIGRATION-POLICING-LAWS...The only GOOD NEWS is that we are only just over a year away from leaving the monstrous soon to be containment camp know as the EU SUPER-STATE a plan of ADOLF-HITLER in 1940 for GERMANY to dominate Europe in the PEACE .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[brought forward from June-2008

H.F.1449
 

 
 

A MAN of VISION-A LEARNED PATRIOT for whom LONDON DOCKERS MARCHED on WESTMINSTER in his SUPPORT-HISTORY has VALIDATED his FEARS.

*

 

Words

Enoch would never have uttered

 

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail- Friday, November 9, 2007]

 

 

THERE is a long standing form of moral evasion popular among politicians - and some journalists too - which has always intrigued me , if only for its

IMPUDENCE

It involves Enoch Powell's so called 'river of blood' speech in 1968, whose recollection has forced the resignation of the Tory candidate for Halesowen and Rowley Regis. The speech itself, incidentally, was notable for understating the prospective immigrant population.

 

'Ah, yes, you see,' the cry of the political elite has long run (I read it again last week),

'It was that speech , that phrase, which made rational discussion of immigration impossible.'

Note the implication that these people had been indulging in a rational debate on immigration only to be thrown off course by Powell's hand-grenade.

Let me assure you with every fibre of my being that a rational discussion was just what leading politicians were avoiding.

THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

by both front benches

-which drove Powell to fury.

Far from making thoughtful debate impossible, his speech and reaction made it

VERY URGENT

As an admirer and friend of Powell I was myself dismayed by that sanguinary phrase. But the real shock lay in the public reaction.

Dockers from the East End marched on Westminster demanding  to protest at

TED HEATH

sacking Powell from the Shadow Cabinet.

Opinion polls showed massive backing for Powell, to say nothing of the largest politician's postbag on record, in which the overwhelming majority supported him.

THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

sprang from the fact that the problem had become so daunting. Effective action would have to be on a major scale , admit to previous failures and would risk, indeed ensure, denunciation from every pulpit in the land (lay and clerical)

It was easier for politicians and commentators, all secure in their leafy suburbs, to assure the public that the problem would be solved by

INTEGRATION

NOW, however, the genie was out of the bottle. So in the 1970 Tory manifesto Heath promised

'No further large scale permanent immigration'.

BUT

of course, there was.

 

The 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act

 

TOO LITTLE and TOO LATE

had allowed those already here or able to secure work vouchers to bring in their families and 'dependant relatives'.

THEY CAME IN SWARMS

 

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

UNCLES

and

SISTERS

and their

COUSINS

and their AUNTS.

They came from the sub-continent where birth certificates were far form common and anyone could claim a blood relationship. Money readily changed hands. So that Tories changed the law to say that only

Spouses

Fiances

and

Fiancees

would be allowed.

 

But by 1976, the level of intercontinental match-making had reached such a level the Foreign Office dispatched a senior official to the sub-continent to assess the

PROBLEM.

He observed that allowing in married and affianced partners would open up a whole new group of applicants -'subsequently entitling

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

and allegedly distressed

RELATIVES

to seek entry.

IT WOULD BE LIKE BAILING OUT THE OCEAN.

 

SO AN EFFORT was made to tighten up the rules but it was -how did you guess?

TOO LITTLE-TOO LATE

Since Heath's promise

TO CLOSE THE DOOR

more than

3,000,000

non-British immigrants have arrived

IN THIS COUNTRY

And traffic in spouses between such places such as

BRADFORD and BANGALORE

HAS CONTINUED APACE

 

Two other factors have long overhung any rational debate on

IMMIGRATION

Most obvious, in an echo of the Salem witchcraft trials, has been the tactic of pointing at someone and shrieking

'RACIST'

-the sin against the Holy Ghost - and even calling for

POLICE ACTION

Believe me , this accusation has long scared the wits out of

FLEET STREET EDITORS

-their legal departments

media commentators generally and politicians of every shade.

IT HAS BEEN CENSORSHIP BY ANOTHER NAME

-the public has been duly cowed.

A technical problem has added to this because the word

RACE

is SHORT -and EASY to FIT into a HEADLINE -while IMMIGRATION isn't. So arguments about IMMIGRATION were labelled in innumerable headlines as being about

'RACE'

The other problem which hindered meaningful debate was that immigrants had come to form a grouping of such

SIZE and IDENTITY

that politicians on all sides thought well worth wooing, indeed crawling to.

NOW

David Cameron has woken up, in intervals between sacking Tory front benchers and Tory candidates for 'racism' to the Government's vulnerability on

IMMIGRATION.

Ministers have trebled the number of work vouchers available to foreign workers over ten years to a level running at

150,000 a year

 

Cameron has no serious solution to

IMMIGRATION

but as the saying is, every bit helps.

 

The supreme irony of this week's fuss around Powell's 1968 speech is that recently had our supposedly internationalist Prime Minister promising

'BRITISH JOBS for BRITISH WORKERS.

Enoch would not have touched such a phrase with a bargepole.

*

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

[Under PR- Proportional Representation the Immigration levels would have been curtailed because the Government of the Day would feel obliged to take a stronger line in order to gather up the votes and back to power. But as we all know it has been this single-minded attitude of the tripartite in your

HOUSE OF COMMONS

to keep power within their grasp and to hell to any outsiders.

Most of the problems in our society over the past 40 years have occurred because of the determination of the party in power to take what they consider a more lenient line on policy whether it is

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

ABORTION

IMMIGRATION

and no doubt dozens of other matters which has resulted in absolute chaos in the above areas.

If they are able to claw in another small section of the community which will be ready voters they will change anything what ever the consequences to the people and the country.

We have been calling for the introduction of

PR in our PARLIAMENT

for many years as a number of bulletins on our website can testify but the very organisations that could achieve this necessary alteration -the numerous political organisations in our country appear not to be interested. And that is the PROBLEM

and until we change the system we shall see the constant over-regulation by the Government and the hair-brained schemes adopted by the so-called OPPOSITION which lays a path of problems in the future.

Of course if PR had been in place over the last four decades there would not have been the

WAR in IRAQ

or even

Mission Impossible in Afghanistan.

 

The Abortion Bill would only have passed if much greater safeguards had been put in place.

 

Immigration would have been freely discussed and sensible measures adopted to allow controlled entry ONLY and those who were prepared to INTEGRATE and NOT THREATEN the very existence of the COUNTRY that they were adopting.

 

Abolition of Capital Punishment Bill failed to honour the feelings in the country that if the Death Sentence was abolished that MURDER would mean a LIFE SENTENCE where the circumstances warrant it. Even before the abolition of the penalty over 50 per cent of murderers had their sentence commuted to life imprisonment and that didn't mean twelve or even three years or less today. The liberal establishment have much to answer for ,whether in believing that prisons should be five star hotels or that a fine that is never paid is the answer to the increased

MURDERS- GUN /KNIFE CRIME- BURGLARY- ROBBERY-THEFT-ASSAULT and whatever.

 

 

Our so-called Criminal Justice system would have been unable to treat prisoners as visitors and victims as criminals and there would have been Bobbies of the Beat- more prisons, and punishment to fit the crime.

Over the past 40 years the majority of your politicians in

YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS

 have been feathering their own nests to the point today in November 2007 there are many of them on a comfortable

£250,000 [at least] a year.

They fiddle their expenses-They lie about their expenditure-They lie about the true facts of the EU. In fact many of them lie about almost everything. They only work for a little over half a year .They have gold-plated pensions and they will be comfortable for the rest of their lives. As for what happens to their country as far as many of them are concerned our country had never existed.

Of course in such a bedlam there are a small group of men and women of

Honour and Integrity

who alas are ignored by their colleagues -some say they even detest them. Guilty secrets no doubt.

 

As for Europe the lies could not have been hidden if there had been eurosceptic parties at Westminster.  And the CONSPIRACY that has taken place since 1972 would not have been in place and our NATIONHOOD and COUNTRY threatened with extinction as will be the case in your Parliament in the early months of 2008.

*

THE ENEMY WITHIN IS YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT WHICH INTENDS TO SELL YOUR COUNTRY TO FOREIGN POWERS.

November-2007.

*

H.F.1594

 *
LITTLEJOHN

 

 As Marx said, history does have the ... A Very British Coup revolved around a conspiracy by the military, the media, big business and M15...

 

 

So this is what a very British coup looks like.

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

SOME of you will recall the novel

A Very British Coup,

subsequently made into an award-winning television series on Channel 4.

It was written by Labour MP Chris Mullin, published in 1982, and revolved around a conspiracy by the

MILITARY-THE MEDIA-BIG BUSINESS-M15

to bring down a Left-wing government.

At the time, the plot was entirely credible, since Britain was riven by strikes and revolution was in the air. I read the book as a young labour and industrial correspondent, and it made sense to me.

 The Bennites were in the ascendancy, Margaret Thatcher was horribly unpopular and it looked as if the wizened Hampstead Leftie Michael Foot-Worzel Gummidge, as Private Eye dubbed him-would be our next Prime Minister.

Mullin's assumptions were based  on hard fact. In the Seventies there had been well-founded reports about the Establishment plot to depose Labour's Harold Wilson.

In some quarters, there were even rumblings of a military coup.

A couple of years ago, when the un reconstructed Bennite Jeremy Corbyn became leader, Mullen talked about writing a sequel. He imagined the Funny  People orchestrating a putsch to thwart a democratically elected Corbyn government.

Trouble is, history has a habit of not working out as you expect. Although, as Marx said, history does have the capacity to repeat itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. That's where we are right now. Except tragedy and farce are running in tandem.

WE are in the middle of

A VERY BRITISH COUP

but not as Mullin predicted. What we're seeing is an elaborate, well-financed and coordinated plot to overturn as extreme Left-wing Prime Minister

BUT

the democratically expressed will of the British people.

It's being mounted by the Government of the day, aided and abetted by Big Business and the Civil Service.

[A repeat of 1970's-again by a supposed Conservative Government.]

 

THIS is A  Very BRITISH Coup, only written by Lewis Carroll not Chris Mullin. In our new Looking Glass World, words mean-as Humpty Dumpty declared-whatever they want them to mean.

Thus the dwindling band of MPs sticking uo for the

17.4 MILLION who voted

LEAVE

are condemned as plotters and rebels

Those, including Theresa May, who are doing everything in their power to

PREVENT

BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU

and becoming once again a

PROUD SOVEREIGN NATION

are hailed absurdedly as true patriots

As I've said often enough, just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

About the only thing upon which I've ever agreed with Ken Livingstone - apart from cheap Tube fares - was when he wrote a book called

If Voting Changed Anything They'd Abolish it. The Establishment seems hell-bent on proving him

Right over Brexit .

[The EDP has over decades seen much evidence of this very fact and though continually bringing evidence to the surface nobody appears to be interested whether it is lack of Bobbies -on-the beat - Health Service in crisis-Pot-holes-closed Police Stations...Britons on worst State Pensions in the Europe-even Portugal is marginally more. And a bloated -wasteful and grotesque so-called FOREIGN AID which even some regimes as recipients have requested to be stopped .

I told  you the day after the referendum that the fix was already in . Now they're on the final furlongs

We're being informed, in no uncertain fashion that

OUR VOTES ARE WORTHLESS

that they don't count.

WE'RE TOO IGNORANT, TOO UNEDUCATED, TOO RACIST

To be taken seriously.

Politicians who try to square the circle are vilified.

One minute Dominic Raab, who attempted to make a go of being Brexit Secretary, is a principled pragmatic operator of the highest praise.

The next, when he is forced to resign because Mother Theresa has deliberately undermined his position and then lied about it, he's dismissed as a disloyal traitor. And If I hear anyone else demanding a second

'People's Vote'

I'll scream.

All they want to do is reverse the referendum result or give us three options so they can split the

LEAVE VOTE

To be honest, I can't take much more of this patronising guff. The Beeb's idea of discerning commentators these days seems to extend no further than 'Baroness' Shameless Chuckabutty, Potty Toynbee and Mad Alastair Campbell, the author of the dodgy dossier which took into an

ILLEGAL WAR IN IRAQ.

 

As I believe I may have observed before. Campbell is the only bloke I know with a certificate to prove he's sane.

And don't get me started on the CBI which throughout my career has been wrong about everything from joining the euro to the Thatcher reforms. The CBI speaks only for monopolistic, multinational megacorps, not the small-to-medium businesses which are the backbone of our economy and always get the rough end  of the pineapple from Brussels - even though they don't sell so much as a brass washer outside British borders.

Twenty-five-odd years ago, covering a CBI conference in Glasgow, I watched the chairman of Dunlop taking the stage wearing a kilt and waving a Union Jack, as part of an I'm Backing Britain campaign. The following week he sold the company to the Japanese.

These are the same people bnow claiming to have British interests at the heart of their determination to

KEEP US SHACKLED TO THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC EU

The final straw came when the arrogant Amber Rudd was restored to Government over the weekend and immediately demanded loyalty and unity around Mrs May's 'deal'.  Her commitment to 'loyalty' hasn't stopped her trashing Cabinet colleagues in the past.

This fanatically pro-EU women who oozes an inter-galactic sense of  entitledment from every pore, is the sister of the PR spiv Roland Rudd, who is paid a small fortune to run

PROJECT FEAR

on behalf of his well-healed clients.

Just imagine if one of Boris's siblings was cashing in on

BREXIT.

The calls from Remainers for the police to investigate would be deafening. By Sunday, I'd had enough and reached the point where I came over all Tom Robinson.

I've given up reading the papers,

I've given up watching TV.

 

LOOK, I repeat, for those of you who missed it the first time round, even tungsten-tipped hard Brexiteers like me accept there will have to be some concessions if we're going to escape from the EU straitjacket.

And I do think the prospect of a Marxist Corbynista government is too horrible to contemplate.

But I also believe its 1992 all over again. This is Mother Theresa's

BLACK WEDNESDAY

MOMENT

WHATEVER HAPPENS NEXT

THE TORIES

ARE SHOT TO PIECES.

All trust and confidence in them has drained away and we're looking at a Labour government by default whenever the next election is called

Most of the 17.4 million who believe they have been betrayed will simply stay at home, or drift back to Labour. Democracy will be the ultimate casualty of this shabby debacle.

The pathetic defeatest dog's breakfast of an agreement

 which Mother Theresa is trying to force down our throats isn't worthy of the description 'deal'.

It is a monstrous capitulation and will be etched on her political gravestone, even if she does manage to get it, or a version thereof, through Parliament.

Where do we go from here?

I haven't a clue.

But at least we now know exactly

what a

Very British Coup

LOOKS LIKE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 20,2018

H.F.1747

 

 

 
 
 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 5-2019

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 6-2019

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2019

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-PAGE 2-2019

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

 

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019