We wish to express our indebtedness and gratitude to those who in books and articles have sought to alert the Nation to its Danger, and whose observations are reflected or summarised here: in particular,


Rodney Atkinson and Norris McWhirter

for Treason at Maastricht


Adrian Hilton for The Principality and Power of Europe


Lindsay Jenkins for The Last Days of Britain



For the late Lord Shore of Stepney’s

Separate Ways



Copies of this booklet can be obtained from the Publishers -Priced 1.20 incl p&p


St Mathew Publishing Ltd

24 Geldart St.


Tel: 01223 504871 Fax: 01223 512304





50 marching orders


In specifying that matters affecting peace keeping are determined by majority vote, the Amsterdam Treaty weakened Britain’s control over her armed forces, her veto lapsing once a strategy for deployment is agreed, so that the possibility exists of her committed forces becoming involved in conflicts contrary to her proper interests, or being unable to contribute to her own defence.


51. critical tasks


A stated purpose of the European Army in the ‘’Petersburg tasks’’, as being its use in undefined’’critical situations’’, or, in the French Prime minister Lionel Jospin’s more specific phase, ‘’to maintain internal security’’ (9th May 2000), needs to be viewed in the light of the fact that the EU’s treaties asserting the primacy of its law offer no mechanism for a member state’ withdrawal; of the question how the EU would force its laws on a recalcitrant state; and, particularly, of the history of nations liberating themselves, sometimes by violent means, from artificial conglomerates.


52. lost in pool


The most familiar example of the verbal deception constantly used by the EU’s proponents has been the notion of ‘’sharing’’ or ‘’pooling’’ of national sovereignty, despite the fact that, amongst the things incapable of being ‘’pooled’’ and kept, are an individual’s secret, a husband’s wife, and a nation’s sovereignty, the pooling of sovereignty actually dissolving it, since the nation concerned can thereafter be outvoted and overruled.


53. treaties of subjugation


A recurring plea for the EU is that Britain has never really been independent, but always depended on the past on treaties of alliance with other countries, and so is merely doing as before; but while former treaties have been agreements as to a line of policy for a period, leaving untouched the sovereignty of the participants, the EU treaties involve actual surrender to the EU of constitutional powers and of sovereignty itself, and thus the loss for ever of Britain’s independence.


54.   sovereign provinces?


The commitment of the signatories of the Treaty of Rome to the creation of an ultimate political union in a European State, to which their electorates would not have consented, was disguised by the treaty’s use of the unspecific and indefinite phrase’ ever closer union’’, which can be variously interpreted, and seems to imply no more than good neighbourliness and friendly co-operation between member states.


55. double talk


The emerging European State is constantly referred to by EU politicians ‘’as a union of sovereign states’’; but the word sovereign, denoting absolute supremacy, dominion or jurisdiction, cannot apply to states which, having yielded up the powers constituting their sovereignty, have thereby become provinces of the institution now possessing their former sovereignty and exercising it over them.



56.   hold on….


The common assertion that ‘’three million jobs depend on our being in the EU’’ is deceptive, in what these jobs depend on is trade; that Britain being the EU’s biggest market, trading arrangements will readily be forthcoming between the EU and an independent Britain; and that, in order to trade with any state, one does not have to join it.


57. metaphors assorted


Appeals that Britain must not be left behind, miss the bus, or stand on the sidelines, but get on board, jump in the driving seat, exercise leadership, fight our corner, and be at the heart of Europe, belie the truth that Britain will have greater influence on Europe and in the world outside the European State as an independent nation, than inside it as a province; instances of tail wagging dogs being somewhat rare.


58. paper victory


The chief means of securing the merging European State’s dominance has been the torrent of its directives and mandatory regulations, affecting and gradually changing nearly all aspects of Britain’s industrial, commercial and national life, which Parliament at Westminster has been powerless to question, and almost as unable to scrutinise, the number being over 30,000 since 1973.



59. grace and favour


Although the EU and British Government spokesmen have urged that ‘’subsidiarity’’ will remedy the ‘’democratic deficit’’ through the decentralization of power, powers once apportioned to the EU, the so called ‘’acquis communautaire’’, belongs to it for ever and cannot be touched; and any such minor freedoms as its lower structures may be allowed will have been bestowed, not as of right, but as concession from the governing authority.


60. carve up


An important part of the process of consolidating rule from Brussels is the setting up, by unofficial self-appointed ‘’ constitutional conventions’’, and with government encouragement, of artificial EU regions and ‘’parliaments’’ within Britain, to be funded in some respects by grants from Brussels rather than Westminster, in keeping with the Roman principle of ‘’divide and rule’’.


61. take -over


An informal and highly successful method of extending its authority has been Brussels’ creation of regulatory agencies or ‘’networks’’, using the already existing Civil Service organisations and staffs of member states, but requiring them by mandatory EU regulations to report to the Commission, work according to its guidelines, and constantly apply EU law: so including them in its own bureaucracy with minimum effort and expense, and with no outward sign of their having been taken over.


62. get them young


Since the plan is, by necessity, as much concerned with the conquest of minds as with the acquisition of territory, children and college students are receiving special attention through EU school literature, and university professorships under the Commission’s ‘’Jean Monnet Project’’ (102 by May, 2001) - funded by Brussels, which also has the final say in who is appointed to these posts (We now know the significance of the expression the ‘Enemy Within’. See further details on bulletin- Constitutional No.12).


63. hook or crook


The EU’s huge spending on propaganda and ‘’information services’’ (in 1996 amounting to 200 million) funds an extensive range of projects, from ensuring the Swedish ‘’Yes’’ vote organisers had Twenty times the finance of the ‘’No’’, to producing one-sided publications (contrary to Section 407 of the 1996 Education Act) like ‘’Partners in Europe’’ for all schools, or ‘’The Raspberry Ice Cream War’’ cartoon booklet, ‘’a comic for young children on a peaceful Europe without frontiers’’, or for younger children the colouring book ‘’Lets Draw Europe Together’’, with a slogan’’Europe, our future’’ and picture of an infant carrying an EU banner and wearing a 12 starred nappy, to awarding grants through the secret Committee of the Soul of Europe organisation to British Churches’’ which explicitly promote the integration of Europe.’’ (This Nazi example of conditioning the young is only the beginning of the ungodly and untrueful message which the despotic and corrupt and parasitic members of the EU Propaganda Ministry have in store for any misguided Soul who fails to see through their Lies and Deceit.)


64. muffled media


A disturbing feature in the sphere of communication has been the consistently trivialised and EU-biased treatment of the Europe issue itself in the TV and radio media especially, but also in much of the Press, a situation confirmed with respect to the BBC by an (unreported) independent survey commissioned by Lord Pearson of Rannoch, accounted for by T Spectator (1st July 2000, p.24) as top-down institutional bias, and explicable only in terms of official and media collusion.



65. beached at nice


Provisions of the Nice Treaty, explained as necessary for EU enlargement, but whose real purpose was to speed integration through extension of qualified majority voting which had already minimised Britain’s veto there to a mere 8.4%


66. a game of forfeit


As a consequence of Nice, Brussels can, amongst other things, sign international treaties binding on Britain without her agreement, take over her seats on international bodies, appoint to positions in the EU persons to whom she might object, make changes in the operation of EU courts increasing their power over her own, and oblige her to provide financial help for member states in economic difficulty; while Britain surrenders the ability to subsidise its industries, to regulate the water companies, and to decide its own policy on Immigration matters, leaving her without effective control over which and how many people are let into the country.




67. retractable rights


Despite earlier denials by Blair administration, the Charter of so called Fundamental Rights will both become part of EU law and form the basis of a European State Constitution; but these ‘’rights’’, far from being absolute and inalienable as under UK law, are held as being conferred under the Charter, and capable of being withdrawn in the case of any person if this is deemed in the interests of the European State.


68. dangerous dissent


Much the same treatment extends to member states, since, under the provisions of the Treaty of Amsterdam (article F.1), dissent expressed by a state’s political party, or by that state’s elected government, and judged to be contrary to the ethos of the EU can lead to that government’s being pilloried, and its electorate deprived of their rights under the Treaty, including voting rights: a procedure which incidentally can render any state’s veto inoperative, but which is in principle objectionable as authoritarian and anti-democratic.



69. but some are more equal


To these actual and potential encroachments upon liberty must be added the EU’s assumption of powers to take action to marginalize or otherwise suppress political parties, or what it terms religious ‘’sects’’ (the word on the Continent usually applied to Protestant churches), which might be regarded as coming into conflict with concepts to be upheld under the European State.


70. absolutism


Arrangements for the victimisation or suppression by any means of political parties or religious organisations are unknown and alien to the Western democracies, being incompatible with individual liberty and freedom of thought and speech which their constitutions and parliaments exist t6o protect and promote.


71. EuroArrest


The EU Arrest Warrant introduced upon the plea of action against terrorism, covering a wide range of 32 offences most of which have nothing to do with terrorism, and soon to apply to any alleged criminal offence carrying a term of imprisonment of one year or more, is a substantial instalment of Corpus Juris, imposed at the opportune moment following the September 11th terrorist outrage in the United States.


72. extradition on demand


The Warrant enables any state of the EU to obtain the automatic extradition for trial under its own judicial system of anyone from other member countries, without the production of evidence, and without any court in that person’s country having power to intervene.

( This is no Joke - but fact- which many of our citizens are unaware )


73. criminality extended


Under the Arrest Warrant, offences previously non-existent in British law now become crimes, under the categories of ‘’swindling’’ and ‘’xenophobia’’.

74.          a doddle


‘’Swindling’’ is so vague a notion that it would be easily possible for any litigant who wished to frame some sort of charge against almost anyone on the basis of old figures or accounts. (Welcome to the world of Corpus Juris from across our once impenetrable moat)



75. opposite of conglomerophilia


Is the term’’xenophobia’’, meanng fear of or aversion from foreigners, to be formally employed., as it already is being colloquilly, for the purpose of vilifying those who, believing in their country’s Independence, are against its integration into the European State, their ‘’crime’’ of patriotism constituting a new kind of heresy?



76. wait and see


An MP who inquired what the thus-termed offence of zenophobia consisted of received the government reply that its definition would be a matter for the presiding judge at the defendant’s trial; a statement which, however absurd in itself, is evidence of a threatening development.


77. terrorists galore


Of equal note is the definition of ‘’terrorism’’ in the EU legislation as an act of intimidation with the intention of’’seriously altering…political, economic or social structures’’, and as the ‘’unlawful seizure or damage to state or government facilities, means of public transport, infrastructure facilities, places of public use and property’’: a category so broad that those engaged in public protests, demonstrations and civil disobedience could now find themselves charged as ‘’terrorists’’.


78. euro-and beyond


Though repeatedly asked, Mr Blair has refused the reasonable request to publish a statement of the political and constitutional consequences of Britain’s joining the euro; and in his Birmingham speech of 23 rd November 2001, summarily dismissed all such considerations with the words,’’if the economic tests are met, political or constitutional barriers should not prevent us joining’’ : of course, without clarifying what the political and constitutional barriers are.


79. curtains


Simply stated, the consequence of our joining the euro would be Britain’s inability to conduct monetary policy, the passing of control over taxation and public spending, and thus of our economy as a whole, to the government in Brussels, and since such control underlies a nation’s existence, the end of Britain as an Independent Nation State.


80. masters of our fate


Britain’s joining the euro would involve up to 80% of her wealth reserves( some 22 billion ) being transferred, together with control of her economic and fiscal affairs, irrevocably into the hands of a number of unelected bankers in Bonn, who by the Amsterdam Treaty (article 108 ), are not obliged to seek or to take instruction from any outside body concerning their conduct of monetary policy or the establishment of interest rates.


81.          a leverage for liberty


Words of a great prime minister, William Ewart Gladstone, are much to the point: ‘’The finance of a country is ultimately associated with the liberties of the country. It is a powerful leverage by which the English liberty has been gradually acquired. If the House of Commons by any possibility loses power of the control of the grants of public money, depend upon it, your very liberty will be worth very little in comparison. That powerful leverage has been what is commonly known as the power of the purse - the control of the House of Commons over public expenditure’’ (1891)




82. prosperous city


Responding to claims that the City of London would suffer if Britain stayed outside the euro, David Llascelles, leading member of a City think-tank, pointed out that in the 3 years since the founder members of the EU locked their currencies together, the City of London had not only flourished, but won the lion’s share of international business denominated in the euro; and that its future independence would be a major asset at a time when it is increasingly difficult for financial centres to differentiate themselves, and would also protect its link with the US and the rest of the world, which represent 2/3 of its total activity, in comparison with the 1/3 of its dealing with Europe ( European Journal, November 2001)


83. big deal


The visible economic disadvantages of Britain’s EU membership range from the loss of fishing waters (soon to become an EU asset) and damage to fisheries and farming, to the 1,000 penalty upon family budgets through protectionist taxes on food, and the 11 billion per year payment to the EU; but the unseen cumulative effect of the restriction of Britain’s advantageous trade with her natural world markets is far more actually and potentially damaging.


84. gift-horse’s mouth


Although just over half of membership costs are returned in Brussels’ grants to the ‘regions’’ of Britain, the EU dictates how the grants are to be spent, so taking over the formal role of Parliament at Westminster, and using the redistribution of what is British money as the means of its growing dominance.



85. clouded horizon


The dangers of membership were demonstrated by the failure of the ERM attempt to link Britain’s currency rate with those of \Europe, estimated to have cost around a million jobs and bankrupted 150,000 businesses; but symptoms like the riing unemployment in France and recession in Germany, and the enormous European pensions debt of 10 trillion ( to remind you that just one trillion is 1000 billion ) , which British taxpayers would have to help remedy, are indications of problems in the making



86. the euro zone


A recent issue of the European Central Bank’s Monthly Bulletin which points to a continuous decline in productive growth in Europe over the last 40 years, and forecasts little if any future growth, promptred Professor Tim Congdon, managing director of Lombard Street Research, to blame’’ the excessive regulation, high taxes and labour market inflexibility found in the eurozone’s member’s, and warn that , if the British people say ‘’Yes’’ to the euro, ‘’they will be burying their nation in a region of policy failure and stagnating living standards, which will suffer drastic relative economic decline in the 21st century’’ (European Journal, December 2001 )


87. a pointer


The fact that the protectionism and costly social programmes favoured by its politicians have significantly hindered economic growth in Europe, while in the same period Britain’s avoidance for the most part of such restrictive policies has resulted in what the City terms ‘’eight years of uninterrupted economic growth’’, is a pointer to the European State’s future, and to Britain’s true interests.



88. sale of birthright


Thomas Jefferson, third President of the United States, once commented,’’ A nation which seeks to trade its political independence for economic gain deserves to lose both’’. If she stays within the emerging European State, and continues to submit to government from Brussels, Britain will lose both her Prosperity and her Independence.


89. a question


The waste and in competence displayed in its 10-year efforts for reconstruction in the Balkans despite the huge sums spent, typified by such things as the non-materialisation through bad management of projects for water supply and removal of chemical waste , and the construction of motorways in Greece when the need is for a local network of roads, must (according to Andreas Oldag, Sudeutsche Zeitung, January 2002) raise the question of how efficient the EU will be in the administration of public affairs.


90. a refusal


The EU Court of Auditors, which for many years in succession has heavily criticised the way money is spent, wasted and stolen from the EU budget, has again in 2001 refused to accord its certificate of reliability to the European Commission in view of the high level of mistakes in the budgets fior agriculture and the structural funds, which make up some 50% of the total EU budget ( Handelsblatt, 13Novenber 2001.  

[ As at December 2006 -The EU has still not had its accounts passed by its accountants.]


91. a scandal


The cronic tendency to corruption in the EU was highlighted by the revelation in 1998 by Paul van Buitenen, a Commission auditor, of massive fraud in some of the biggest Commission projects, involving close friends and family members of the Commissioners, but though van Buitenen’s disclosure forced the resignation of the entire Commission, almost all had soon reinstated themselves: and two years after Commissioner Neil Kinnock’s appointment to eradicate corruption, Die Welt reported that ‘’little or nothing had been changed…the new Commission is just like the old’’ (5th April 2000)



92.. independent Britain


There is more prospect of prosperity and security for this country as a member of the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA ), in which Britain and her people would be able to trade world -wide, retain all their historic rights, privileges, and suffer no loss of national independence.



93. a kinship in liberty


Historically, culturally and politically, Britain has far more in common with the English-speaking peoples of the North Atlantic and the Commonwealth countries, who together have imparted to many nations the lesson of liberty, developed the world’s oldest system of representative government, been the first to recognise inviolable and fundamental rights , and created judicial systems free from influence or interference by the state.


94. separate ways


This profound kinship, and the need to sustain it politically by separateness from Europe, was uppermost in the mind of Winston Churchill when, in his famous Zurich speech in September, 1946, envisioning a future union of the Continental states, he described Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations and ‘mighty America’’ as its prospective ‘’friends and sponsors’’ offering support and help; and observed, ‘’

‘’We are with Europe but not part of it. We are linked, but not combined. We are interested and associated, but not absorbed ‘’


* * *




[‘ Everything by the EU- but nothing by YOU ’]



(More Reasons to follow shortly.) Or you may order a booklet (1.20pinp&p) from:


St Mathew Publishing Ltd

24 Geldart St. Cambridge



Tel. 01223 504871. Fax. 01223 512304


 For further information about the EU.






A Prime Minister in 1848

to another

Gordon Brown in 2007

Over a Hundred and Fifty Seven years ago a great patriotic Prime Minister -Foreign Secretary -Lord Palmerstone (Henry John Temple) -beloved by his People defined the principle of nationality as follows:


Providence meant mankind to be divided into separate nations, and for this purpose countries have been bounded by natural barriers, and races of men have been distinguished by separate languages, habits, manners, dispositions, and characters…” (1848)


“…We have in the first place to say that the Business of an English Government, is to pursue that course of Foreign Policy which on the whole they may think right; and not to attempt the impossible task of at all times and upon all subjects doing that which is agreeable to all Foreign Governments. A man who in private life attempts to please everyone, invariably fails; and the Government of a great country would not be more successful in such an endeavour…

. It must at times be an advantage to a foreign Prince…in the present state of the continent to visit England and to see with his own eyes, how Liberty may be combined with Loyalty, Freedom with public order, and how the Respect which is shown by the Crown for the Rights of the Subject and for the enactment of the Law produces corresponding Feelings on the Part of the People and inspires them with similar Respect for the Rights of the Crown and for the Laws which secure the Liberties and the Property of all , from the highest to the lowest in the Land. ”


For a full statement of his Principles:


“I hold with respect to alliances that England is a Power sufficiently strong, sufficiently powerful to steer her own course, and not to tie herself as an unnecessary appendage to the policy of any other Government. I hold that the real policy of England-apart from questions which involve her own particular interests, political or commercial-is to be the champions of justice and right, pursuing that course with moderation and prudence, not becoming the Quixote of the world, but giving the weight of her moral sanction and support wherever she thinks that justice is, and wherever she thinks wrong has been done…


It is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.” [In 1848 Lord Palmerstone was Foreign Secretary at the age of sixty-three. He entered Parliament in 1807- Secretary at War in 1809; 1811-28 (most years) War Office; 1830- 1852 Foreign Office; 1852-55 -Home Office; 1855-65.


‘ Born 1784 in Park Street Westminster. Family home ‘Broadlands’ Hampshire. Died on the morning of October 18, 1865. And the last candle [last of his contempories] of the Eighteenth century was out.’


* *


[It is significant that the word ‘England’ was not a word despised in our House of Commons during the time of this great patriot of England and only closer to our own times has the word Britain taken its place though we do detect a slight revival now in existence. ]


* *

Words of a great Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, are much to the point:


‘’The finance of any country is ultimately associated with the liberties of the country. It is a powerful leverage by which English liberty has been gradually acquired. If the House of Commons by any possibility loses the control of the grants of public money, depend upon it, your very liberty will be worth very little in comparison. That powerful leverage has been what is commonly known as the power of the purse – the control of the House of Commons over public expenditure’’(1891)





Let the people speak!




[Latest Addition - June07]






Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU






67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM






July 18-2007




Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition


The  Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.


'The Spirit of England'


Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953







[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

























[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]






Home Rule for Scotland





[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]




[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]



[Read above what other patriotic Englishmen and women  say about the subject which few as is our nature wish to talk about.]




The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138

MPs voted by 362 - 224 for the Reform Treaty in its Second Reading on Monday 21st January. This sixth and final treaty, now renamed the Lisbon Treaty, formally replaces Britain with the European Union on 1st January 2009. This is a year before the deadline set by the Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel.

The Treaty will abolish the British Constitution, and therefore the nations of Britain and England, sweeping away our Westminster Parliament, and giving the EU the power to close it.

The Treaty sets up an unelected three tier politburo executive in Brussels with absolute power, a dictatorship on the soviet model. The EU parliament has no power and is a sham.

Read the Reform Treaty one page summary on the left. Gordon Brown was lying: the Treaty is worse than the constitution.

This sixth treaty is the fastest moving and most secret the EU has drafted; opposition to and recognition of the EU as a police state is growing, and they know speed is vital.

This Commons vote, one of the most important in our history, was largely unreported by our controlled press and media.


The Queen and Parliament to complete ratification this spring, 2008

Parliament has allocated 29 days to discuss this treaty in February (not much for its own abolition). They will probably have the final ratification vote in March. The Queen, the EU's most loyal supporter, plans to give her Royal Assent in June 2008. This means Westminster and the Queen will ratify it behind our backs, as they have the other five treaties.


No referendum

German Chancellor Merkel chose this sixth Treaty instead of pushing it through as a constitution to avoid referendums in its member nations. She twice visited 10 Downing Street and forced Gordon Brown to cancel both his promised referendum, and his General Election.

"Anti-EU" groups have encouraged us to call for a referendum precisely because the EU has already prohibited it. They know we are wasting our efforts: our four party leaderships take their orders from the EU, not from the voters.


How to fight

The real course of action is to change the minds of 70 MP's and get a majority against. MP's have been selected on the Party list system over the last 20 years to ensure an obediant majority of pro-EU MPs.

These MPs now need to understand the EU has the constitution (the six treaties) of a dictatorship, the laws of a police state, and when enforced, its 111,000 regulations will create a government command economy, soviet style: dictatorships cause poverty.

They also need to realise that MPs are the people who put this dictatorship in power. If they put it in power, they are the greatest threat to take it out of power. All dictatorships in the past have eliminated that threat. Inside the EU, the lives of MPs will be even worse than our own; at best, they are likely to be institutionalised and held against their will. (This is the only good bit - these hated traitors will suffer severely.)

Visit your MP in his surgery NOW and explain this. (Instructions top left)



The EU remains illegal

Each of these six treaties are completely illegal under the British Constitution, our 1689 Bill of Rights, our treason laws, and under our common law. It is unforgivable that the Queen, her Ministers and our Parliament have committed the criminal act of treason by signing these treaties, and broken our laws to abolish our nation.

The EU will always be illegal in Britain; but once the EU has complete power and control here, we can no more get rid of it than we could Germany, had their planned illegal occupation of Britain in 1940 been successful.


The Countdown to abolition

Whereas the 465 page EU Constitution would have abolished the five treaties and replaced them with a single document conferring absolute power, the Reform Treaty adds to the existing five treaties, bringing them up to the powers of the EU Constitution. All six treaties with appendices add up to nearly 10,000 complex and unreadable pages. Tony Blair agreed to it on 23rd June 2007 as his final stab in Britain’s back. On the 23rd July there was an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), when we should have seen a first draft of the Treaty.

Foreign ministers agreed its terms on 7-8th September at the resort of Viana de Castelo, Portugal. There was a summit in Lisbon on the 18th and 19th October, where they hoped to sign the Treaty, but Gordon Brown signed it on December 13th 2007, commiting treason, the most criminal act on the statute book.

The EU has decided to act now as if the Treaty were already in force; they are consolidating their power each day. On 1.1.2009 the Reform Treaty and the other five seize all remaining power from our Westminster Parliament, which becomes defunct on that day; it has no remaining powers whatsoever. (The Treaties do allow Brussels to return minor powers, but that is very unlikely.) On 11th June 2009 we have bogus elections to the sham Brussels Parliament, the only elections we will get in the future.

Westminster's five year term expires on 5th May 2010 and a British General Election is due. The six treaties make no provision for an election to our Parliament. By that time the EU will have consolidated its absolute power, and it will almost certainly use it cancel that election and to close Westminster. The EU has always planned to rule what was Britain directly through its 12 nominated Regional capitals, by passing Westminster, from which every function will be removed.

Its founders knew the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. They tried twice before in 1914 and 1939. Britian has to be utterly destroyed for the EU to succeed. The success of the EU's Frankfurt School subversion techniques on Britain (see left) has been astonishing; the abolition of Westminster is one of their final remaining goals.


You have 11 months left

Treason is the most serious of all Britain’s crimes. You have just 11 months left to bring these vile British traitors to justice, and get us out of the EU dictatorship.

Around 45 million British people are against the abolition of our nation, and with the little European voting that has been allowed, it seems clear over 200 million of its victims don’t want the EU. But we will never be given the choice. YOU have to decide to act yourself.

There are ways to stop the EU - see "Your Campaigns" on the left. Then we will need a mass blockade of Westminster to stop our criminal MP's and Queen breaking our constitution and laws for the last time.

Copy of the EU's Timetable at the BBC.

Original 2009 article from German Parliament -.pdf for download
Then check it at the German Parliament here





Campaigns: Print these .pdf's: One or two pages each.

   Your Campaigns

   Ten EU truths

   Reform Treaty one page

   50 reasons to leave

   EUtruth flier

   Common Purpose

   Abolition of Councillors

   Abolition of 48 Counties

   Map: the 9 EU regions

   Transnational regions

   Reform Treaty full text

   EU Constitution, one page pdf
   EU Constitution: one page html

   Signs of EU police state

   The EU's degraded our lives

   What will the EU be like?

   List of British traitors

   Beef up the British Constitution

   Lib Lab Con: One Party State

   The Queen

   The EU's Hitler

   The EU costs 200 billion pa

   The dictatorship: Quotes

   UK > EU handover of power.

   EU subversion diagram.

   Subversion: Common Purpose

   Frankfurt subversion.

   The terrorism deception

   Abolition of our 48 counties

   Abolition of Parliament.

   Church flier

   Some revolutionary lyrics - copy of this site

   The Westminster News

   The Devonport Column

   The Cornish Free Press

   The British Free Press

   Government disinformation

   Mobilisation talk

   Blueprint to get out

   SS child snatching

   Wood's rigged elections

   Stood for the leadership




Where we are now:

1. Since 1972 The Queen has illegally signed five of the six EU Treaties.

2. The five treaties define and build the EU as an unelected dictatorship.

3. The EU's laws, passed by Westminster, give it the powers of a police state.

4. The sixth EU treaty will complete the abolition of Britain as a nation
    - the Queen is due to sign it this year.

A foreign power, the EU, will then rule us, and enforce the laws of a police state.

Shouldn't we repeal the 1972 European Communities Act now
before we are imprisoned permanently inside? We've only got till July 2008.

Please fight the campaigns at the top of the menu on the left.


The leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties have been controlled by the European Union for two decades. It is the EU agenda they implement in Parliament, not your wishes, which is why your vote doesn't count.

Our controlled press and media haven't reported it, but Britain would have been abolished in November 2006 if the French and Dutch hadn't voted down the EU Constitution.

Instead a sixth and final Treaty will now be signed; after which EU Commissioners will have the power to impose the Constitution (and the Euro) on us, and enforce the laws of a police state.


5. Thirty three years inside the EU - have you noticed how our democracy is being withdrawn?
The EU has already denied us that most basic of human rights - the right to vote against the EU and to keep our own nation. A majority of us don't want to be in the EU. We are being forced in against our will.

Do you feel you've become powerless, unable to influence events, or your vote is worth less? The six treaties have been gradually removing our democracy; for thirty years our laws have been "harmonised" with the EU; 80% of the laws now passed by our Parliament are EU laws, not ours. Isn't the real reason people have lost interest in politics precisely because the EU has taken away our ability to change things?

Common law, where the government was our servant, is now largely replaced by the EU's Corpus Juris, which puts the government above the law, and we don't participate. We have already lost most of our rights (including habeas corpus). The power of government grows unchecked, as does that of large corporations. Politicians continuously lie about the EU, pretending its not significant.

6. Massive EU corruption
The EU's auditors have found the fraud is so widespread they've refused to sign off the EU's accounts for each of the last ten years. Whistleblowers like Marta Andreason, the EU Budget Director, who in 2005 found the EU couldn't account for 95% of its 66 billion budget, are simply fired for telling the truth.

7.The bribing of our Politicians by the EU
Europe works by bribing politicians with huge salaries and expenses to vote for Europe, against the best interests of their own voters.

As a result all three parties are in favour of the EU - Westminster acts like a one party state of politicians: the Lib-Lab-Con. The parties are run top down and implement the policy of their leaderships, not that of their members. (unfortunately UKIP is run in the same way). If you have voted for the Labs, Cons or Lib-Dems since 1969, you have voted for the EU dictatorship.

8. EU corruption is now exploding through our Civil Service, our local government, and our 7,000 quangos.
A shadow EU government lives inside our bureaucracy, headquartered in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM.) It includes many parts of government including the RDA and the Regional Assemblies. Common Purpose, an EU organisation, the UK branch also headquartered in the ODPM, has members across many government organisations including some city and county councils, the Land Registry, the police and the NHS, which it is destroying from within.

Common Purpose is the glue that enables fraud to be committed across these government departments, most of it lining the pockets of politicians and bureaucrats. It often involves the sale of public assets such as land to friends of politicians or their businesses. (The RDA -The EU Regional Development Agency, is a major player in this type of fraud.) And the handing out of plum government non jobs with big salaries and expenses to members of Common Purpose, all of it involving the theft of our money as taxpayers. The Chief Executive Officer of Common Purpose is Julia Middleton of the ODPM.

9. Businesses closing under EU regulation
The EU's 111,000 regulations, when fully enforced, will transform Britain from a free market economy into a Soviet style command economy, closing hundreds of thousands more businesses. They will also control our personal lives far more closely than were those of Soviet citizens. (In a Parliamentary answer to Lord Stoddart in January 2003, the government admitted there were 101,811 EU regulations, growing at 3,500 pa).

The cost of Britain's 8,500 quangoes is 124 billion a year, and they raise an additional 40 billion from us in charges, according to the Cabinet Office. The Public Bodies Directory 2006 describes only 882 of them. Most exist to enforce EU regulations; nearly all should be closed.

10. The EU costs us 200 billion pa, 20% of our economy
According to the government's Better Regulation Task Force Annual Report 2005 (Introduction written by Tony Blair,) complying with EU regulations now costs our economy over 100 billion a year.

By far the largest treasury expense is now the 167 billion spent on the EU's 8,500 quangos, (Cabinet Office figures) most of which enforce EU regulation. This is patronage, bribery, putting thousands of officials and influential businessment on 100,000 - 300,000 a year salaries. That's why the Exchequer is so desperate for cash and can't pay for the navy, nurses, students etc.

Economists say we lose 80 billion pa by associating with the EU's inferior economies. The EU took our fishing industry, which costs us 5 billion pa. EU damage to other industries (like forcing us to close the Rover Car Co) a further 20 billion. Our EU contribution is a relatively minor 10 billion, the only bit the Press discuss.

Before we joined the EU we had an even balance of trade with them. Now EU regulations have fixed it so we lose 30 billion year trading with the EU on our balance of payments. We'd be enormously more wealthy if we left.

The main use of taxes is now to finance government and its greedy whirlpool of waste; they've doubled in real terms in the 33 years we've been in the EU. There's less money in the economy left for wages, creating a growing underclass who can't make ends meet.

11. Our counties to be abolished
The Queen signed the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, which adopts the EU Regionalisation Plan. This will abolish England's 48 counties and replace them with 9 European regions, each with their own Regional Capital, which reports directly to Brussels, not to Westminster. This effectively obliterates the country of England. For example the County of Cornwall is replaced by the South West Region, which stretches from Lands End and includes Gloucestershire and Wiltshire; its regional capital is Exeter. As this move is unpopular it is being kept low-key and will not be implemented until the sixth treaty is signed, when we lose our right to object.

12. The deliberate destruction of our standards and way of life,
From Sunday trading, where large stores force staff to work Sundays for derisory pay - or they don't get a job, to the deliberate undermining of the family and teachers, to sex education for the under 13's, to children being given obscene homework, its all traceable via our compliant government back to the EU over the last 34 years, as it sucessfully implemented the subversion of the Frankfurt School. While inside atheist Europe, British Christianity has almost died out; safety on our streets and a great chunk of civilised life has left with it.

13. The EU has controlled our immigration since 1997
In January 2007 on the front page of The Westminster News we forecast 1.5 million immigrants for the year, and people laughed at us. On January 24th 2008 the Daily Express published government figures of 1.3 million Polish immigrants alone for 2007. With Romania and Hungary joining in that year the total was probaly double that. The Amsterdam Treaty handed control of our immigration to the EU. 30,000 a year used to arrive - the EU's increased it by 60 times That's why house prices have been screaming up, even though the population of original British people is falling.

Politicians and huge corporations like immigration - with thousands of immigrants available on low pay, they can impose the minimum wage on millions. Politicians then lie that they can't get British workers to do dirty jobs. The truth is they won't offer a decent wage, and cynically use immigrants to drive wages down, adding to the huge underclass.

The Government pretends there are a maximum of 145,000 immigants annually, and 1.5 million new houses will be needed to house them. But then Jack Straw admits that 2.6 million immigrants applied to stay here last year.

Our infrastructure and services can't stand such huge numbers and is breaking down in some cities, where English people are becoming a 10% minority. But the EU controls it, not the Foreign secretary, and he has no power, no options but to do as EU policy dictates, and accept it.

Michael Howard was lying on the 24th January 2005 when he said he'd fix immigration - as Prime Minister, he'd have had no control over it whatsoever. Immigration hurts our existing immigrants first - new immigrants move into their areas, decreasing the wages and increasing the pressure on housing.

If the sixth Treaty is signed, we lose our right to withdraw and Britain ceases to be a nation. Like the other six, it only requires two signatures: the Prime Ministers, and the Queen's






Examples of how our lives have degraded since we've been in the EU:

In the EU, (which means in Britain) government is above the law.
The EU's corpus juris now pervades right through our legal system. A policeman was let off by magistrates this year (2005) for driving his private car at 159 mph in Ludlow, Shrops. Under Corpus Juris the government are above the law and cannot be prosecuted The judge ruled correctly under EU law. 45,000 police officers got off speed cameras in this way in 2004, although their speeding killed 44 innocent people. (Daily Mail 27.12.05.)

EU "monitoring Officers" have the right to dismiss our Councillors.
The Local Government Act of 2000 empowered the head of the EU government in England, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minster (ODPM) to appoint a monitoring officer to spy on every council. If an elected councillor disagrees with the EU or government line, the unelected "Standards Board for England" can suspend him for up to five years. An example is in Cambridgeshire, where the ODPM has threatened cllr Alex Riley with suspension if he attends any debate discussing the ODPM's plans to build a new town of 20,000 people called Nothstowe on his ward. The ODPM has the conflict of interest here; but its powers are becoming absolute.

We have lost the right to freedom
The EU arrest warrant (signed by the Queen on 18th November 2003) allows us to be arrested without charge and held indefinitely with no right to see a solicitor, make a phone call, or even a right to a trial. You can simply disappear.

Under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (SOCPA) 2005, we can now be arrested and held in the cells by any police officer for any petty offence, like dropping litter. Before it had to be an offense that carried a 5 year jail term. This also applies to all of the EU's 107,000 regulations. Do you know them all?

The Civil Contingences Act 2004 allows government to confiscate anything you possess permanently; you have no right to object. This includes your house. It also gives government the right to forceably move its population around to different locations; you can be left with no place to call your own and live like a refugee. The only check and balance here is a Minister just needs to utter the words "This is a national emergency." If a demonstration or strike government doesn't like is being organised, they can cut off all communications in a town - phones, mobiles, the internet, TV, and block all access to that town including closing roads and railways. It has all the powers and more of Hitler's Enabling Act of 1933.

We have lost the right to free speech
At the Labour Party conference the police held an 82 year old man, Walter Woolfgang, and denied him access to the conference under the EU's "anti terrorist" legislation because he had shouted the word "nonsense" at Jack Straw, who was speaking about Iraq. Terrified the true nature of the laws they have passed on behalf of the EU was escaping too early, the Labour Party stopped the police and begged the man to return to conference.

On October 25th 2005 Miss Maya Evans was arrested under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, for a lone protest at the Cenotaph by reading out the names of the 97 British soldiers killed in the Iraq war. She was arrested by no less than 14 police officers and found guilty at Bow Street Magistrates Court on the 8th December 2005.

Would you hand over our nation, to be ruled by a foreign power, with oppressive laws like these, ? That's what's happening.

We have lost the right to protest
These laws make protest very difficult; if we did hold a General Strike and blockade Westminster it would now require some bravery: the powers the EU has demanded from our government enable it to respond in a way similar to the Chinese government's in Tiaanamen Square should it so wish.

It is no coincidence that since 2004, all MP's offices in Westminster are guarded by police with machine guns, inside and out.

The Governments "terrorism" deception
All these new EU laws, including massive "anti terrorism" acts (recently 2000, 2001, 2005) were passed with the pretence they were only directed at terrorists, or in the case of Asbos, ruffians who terrorise the streets. In each case they are used far more often against ordinary law abiding people, particularly to suppress dissent. (91% of those detained under Terrorism Acts are innocent and have been improperly arrested. Most of the remainder are charged with offences that have nothing to do with terrorism, but cover up over zealous arrests).

We have lost the right to life
Under EU law the "Shoot to kill" policy did not need democratic authorisation. Just two senior police officers authorised the police to kill British people. A democratic vote by Parliament was not required, but even that would not have legalised the killing under British common law. A recent victim was an innocent Brazilian, Jean de Menezes, shot dead in Stockwell underground station, even though he was being held down by police officers at the time of the execution. The police used dum-dum bullets, outlawed under the Geneva Convention because they blow a man to pieces inside.

The police can no longer be convicted for killing innocent people - Philip Prout shot at Lewannick in East Cornwall is just one of 30 people shot dead by police since 1992 when corpus juris crept in. At least one was shot in the back; most were no threat to anyone. Not once since 1992 has a policeman been convicted of any crime for these murders.


Have you noticed this growing police state?
In addition to many more laws than those above, add the 107,000 regulations, and whole bureaucracies such as VOSA building up networks of cameras and databases to record our movements and criminalise us when we can't comply. Persecution is no longer confined to motorists; under EU Corpus Juris our courts have become extensions of government power instead of independent arbiters of justice.

Westminster had passed sufficient of the EU's oppressive laws (the "harmonisation" in the Treaties) by the end of 2004 that we have been living in what is legally a police state since then. But at the moment, its only one per cent enforced. After the Queen signs the sixth Treaty, the EU has the absolute power to enforce 100% of its regulations and laws.


On the basis of the laws and treaties already signed by our Queen and Prime Ministers,

What will life be like in the EU after the 6th Treaty is signed?

Our Westminster Parliament immediately becomes pointess as its remaining powers are transferred to Europe.

It is the formal end of Britain and England as nations.

Britain's 153 embassies around the world will be closed as the ink from the Queen's signature dries. (As Tony Blair refused to admit this has been agreed to, Jose Zapatero, the Prime Minister of Spain, confirmed it in a February 2005 radio broadcast.)

After the EU abolishes our 48 counties your address will change from 4 High St, Taunton, Somerset, Great Britain, to 4 High St, Taunton, Area K, European Union. (The glorious EU county "The South West Region" has had the postal address "Area K" assigned for over a decade.)

The Official National Anthem of the EU, which you should have known since 1971 is based on the melody "Ode to Joy" by Beethoven, formally replaces God save the Queen. The EU flag replaces the Union Jack, the red, blue and white nautical ensigns etc. (The EU Commission has already ordered (24.11.2005) our Merchant Navy to fly the EU flag in place of the red Ensign.)

The EU takes ownership and command of our Police, Army, Royal Navy, RAF, nuclear weapons, currency reserves, North Sea Oil. (See the EU Constitution below)

Serving officers in our police, army, navy and air force already know they will have to take an oath to the EU instead of to the Queen. If they don't many have been told they will be dismissed. The EU will have complete military control of the UK.

The UK Independence Party will be banned under the 1999 ruling of the European court of Justice case c274/99, where it was held that it is illegal to criticise the EU.

The Conservative, Labour and Lib-dem parties will be abolished (only pan EU parties like the EPP or PES are allowed -see clause I.46.4 of the EU Constitution). It will then be blindingly obvious to even the dumbest politician there is no reason to keep Westmister open, and that the EU has the legal right to close it.

Many people will be excluded from the jobs they know best, as the EU's demand that you must pay to be re-taught the job, and pay for a certificate before you can be employed, becomes universal.

Hundreds of thousands more small businesses will close on the enforcement of the remaining 100,000 EU regulations our government has already passed. Several million will be permanently unemployed as a result.

We will all be criminalised by the 107,000 regulations. Its impossible to know or understand 107,000 regulations, and the poor can't possibly afford to comply. We will all be subject to frequent fines and arrest as a result. Here are just 4 examples:

Under EU regulations it is now illegal for you to repair your plumbing, electrics or your car (from 1st January 2006). If you buy a boat over six feet long, built after the EU Recreational Craft Directive of 1999, and don't pay the EU 4,000 to "measure" the boat, you get 6 months imprisonment. We will live under permanent threat of arrest and fear of the knock at the door that takes us away.

Massive corporations will do well, but with huge immigration allowed from the EU, they'll be able to pay minimum wage everywhere, not just in the provinces as they do now. If you don't accept the minimum they'll employ a Pole or a Czekoslovakian.

Big corporations will also have a near monopoly (with the government) on employment and will be able to dictate unfavourable terms to staff without fear of contradiction.

Plum government jobs and corruption will ensure the wealth of politicians, bureaucrats, their businesses and associates at all levels of government, including local government and amongst our 7000+ quangos.

Society will divide into two: the remaining 60% of us will be either unemployed or treated abysmally on minimum wage.

Taxes will rise more steeply to pay for the even larger explosion in government growth and corruption

There will be no redress through local democracy because there won't be any. The nine UK regional governments, which replace our 48 counties and councillors, will be unelected (see the European Regionisation plan). Our only vote is to the powerless EU parliament. We will be ruled by the 25 unelected Commisssioners, and have have no redress at any level; we will be as poor but have less freedom than Soviet Citizens.

If we demonstrate or protest we can be be seized and relocated to another region. The EU Arrest Warrant and Civil Contingencies Act 2004, with 20 other oppressive Acts the Queen has signed between 1972 and 2005, give the government absolute power over us. They can shoot us if they wish with no legal comeback - the shootings of innocents Philip Prout and Jean de Menezes were entirely legal under EU law.

The tendancy to pick on Muslims, as Germany used to pick on Jews, has already begun. Europe will be a very nasty place.

How long will the EU last?
Eventually, perhaps 15 years down the track, Europe will collapse under the weight of its own corruption, bureaucracy, and regulations. There will be so few productive businesses that even at 100% tax rates we will not be able to support the massive, corrupt and wasteful government. Many of us will be starving in the lead up to the collapse. After the collapse we may be able to leave the EU, if a dictator has not taken advantage of the complete absence of democratic checks and balances by seizing power. The Constitution of the EU is similar to the Soviet Union's. That dictator is free to choose between a Soviet or Nazi style government. Then it could take 70 years to break free.



Fifty years ago our greatest threat might have been violence or mugging. Now the greatest threat to our economic well being, our way of life, our freedom and the very existence of our nation, is our own government.





What do we want?

After the repeal of the EU treaties we want a change to our British Constitution so politicians can never hijack our nation again. Every Parliamentary Bill, after its Second Reading, should come down to us, the people, to vote yes or no as to whether the Queen should give it Royal Assent. This will take power away from our destructive politicians and return it to the people, where it belongs. (They do this in Swtizerland - they, not us, are the most democratic nation on earth.) We can then return to being a peaceable, just, honest, prosperous and fully democratic society where everyone's rights, no matter how high or low are respected, and the disadvantaged properly looked after. And where neither governments, corporations nor individuals have obscene wealth and power.


David Noakes 07974 437 097 ;


Campaign to repeal the 1972 European Communities Act and get clean out.


What can you do to help?
1. Find out when your local MP holds their surgery and attend with a printout of this, and the one page summary of the EU constitution below. Ask that MP to cross the floor to be the leader of the first Anti EU Parliamentary Party (representing 65% of our nation). The publicity would be stunning, and might force an in/out vote.
2. Make appointments with your local journalists, give them the same two print outs and ask them to write about the truth about the EU.
3. Do you know anyone famous? Persuade them in the same way to join our cause and get the truth known.
4. Print little stickers: "We didn't vote for this - it has no mandate," and stick them on everything that represents the police state and rip off government.
5. Tell your Town, District and County councillors they are about to be abolished. See below.
6. Do anything you can to get the truth about the EU published.
Or print and hand out this flier (a .pdf), or flier (as a word document). It can be photocopied double sided on to one page.






Our Councillors abolished
Our 20,000 Councillors will be permanently abolished after the EU Regionalisation Plan has established the nine EU Regions. Point out they were elected to serve the public, not the government, and the public has not agreed to their abolition.
Try to persuade them to stand up for the people who voted for them, (which is only doing their duty) by holding a yes/no local ballot on whether the public agree with the abolition of our counties, councillors and nation.

If the public vote no, they should declare, for their Town or county, UDI from Europe and the illegal actions of our government since 1971, particularly the abolition of our British Constiution, common law, our nation and counties. The press coverage this would generate would force the truth into the open nationally, leading to a national in/out ballot on the EU. Just one council could achieve this fabulous result alone.

Download: A summary of the loss of our 48 counties (a WP file)

Download: A map of the nine EU regions (.pdf)

The Devonport Column, exposing Common Purpose nationally, and corruption in Plymouth.

The six treaties are:
1. The European Communities Act 1972.
2. The Single European Act, 1986.
3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992.
4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997.
5. The Nice Treaty 2001.

The sixth will be called something equally innocuous, like the Treaty of Lille. Then the loss of our nation, way of life and freedom will be complete.


The best summary of the six treaties is the Constitution
It reveals the true nature of the EU. Some British politicians were horrified when they saw the EU's absolute power revealed in its new constitution, and falsely accused the EU of much more than a tidying up exercise. It wasn't, it was a re-statement of the 6 treaties in almost readable English. Our politicians simply hadn't read the six treaties before they voted for them. The French and Dutch "No" votes are being ignored as usual; the EU Constitution is 2/3rds implemented and still being implemented. Dan Hannan of the Brussels EU Constitutional Committee, confirms it will be fully implemended in two years. Brussels can enforce it fully after the Queen signs the sixth EU treaty. Here's a one page summary with Article numbers:

One page summary of the Constitution - pdf for download

UKIP is way understating the costs of the EU. Even the British and EU governments admit to four times the UKIP figure.
The EU is costing us 200 billion pa, 20% of our economy

Quotes from our leaders revealing they know they built the EU as a dictatorship.

EU treaties and publications abolishing our 48 counties


The Conservative Con trick
Many people have been fooled by the Conservative Party into believing the party is anti EU. It was the Conservatives, under Ted Heath, who took us in to the EU, and then he lied that his 1972 EU Treaty wouldn't affect our sovereignty. Three out of the four Prime Ministers who signed the 6 EU treaties were Conservatives, every one af them legally a traitor under the British laws of their time. Do you see a pattern here?

In 2005 Party Leader Michael Howard could have won the election for the Conservatives by making one simple statement: "We will repeal the 1972 EU Communities Act and leave Europe". Millions of Conservative voters would have rejoined the fold. A million Lib-Dems and Labour voters would have joined him. But he didn't.

Because the Conservative leadership would rather be in Europe than be in power.

Instead Howard continued betraying Conservative voters, so he lost. (And to be fair, why should Conservative leaders miss out on the EU corruption gravy train?)

The Conservative leadership is completely dedicated to joining Europe, none more so than David Cameron, who is using the language and methods of Common Purpose against the Conservative Party.

Conservative policy is to reform the EU from the inside (renegotiation). We've been in it 34 years and failed to refom this dictatorship one jot. Their policy is to continue this complete failure, and they know this pretence is wholly dishonest. You either submit to 100% of the EU or don't join it at all; that is the only choice open to us.

Half a cheer for the Lib-Dems
They realise we're now living in what is legally a police state, and speak out against it. We've been forced to harmonise our laws with the EU during the 34 years we've been inside, and the police state we're living in is the EU's. The Lib-Dems tell us with stunning naivity its Labour's police state, don't seem to realise the EU is behind it, and are still madly in favour of the EU. Its no comfort that they will suffer for their stupidity. Lately some Lib-Dem MP's have been talking about the Tories pathetic "reform the EU" idea. Will they never learn?

With the Labour and Lib-Dem parties openly for Europe, and the Conservative leadership secretly for it, its clear the three parties will never give us a vote to leave the EU and keep our nation. Massive civil disobedience, a permanent General Strike, or a blockade of Westminster until MP's resign might be effective.


The abolition of the Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dem parties.
So sloppy have our politicians been in their reading of the EU treaties, most haven't noticed that the EU will abolish our Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dem parties. It was clear in the Madrid 1999 party financing document, and it was re-stated in the Constitution, clause I-46-4. Only pan European parties like the EPP will be allowed. Some politicians, like Heseltine and Ken Clarke, can't wait for this to happen.

A date for the abolition of Westminster has tactfully not been given
Once the 6th treaty is signed, Westminster's remaining powers are transferred to Brussels, and Westminster is left with the powers of a county council. Except it won't have a county, because they will be abolished under the Regionalisation plan. The 9 EU regions report direct to Brussels, so Westminster will be a county council without a county. Anyone with half a brain can see Brussels will abolish Westminster, as it's only potential use would be as a rallying point to challenge the power of Brussels.



The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath
 Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken her coronation oath, by signing these five treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major and Tony Blair.

Realising they stood a good chance of spending the rest of their lives behind bars, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998 (s36.3), which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the five treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her she might have lost her crown (not her life or a limb), and kept her 9 billion plus palaces. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she's dead keen to sign; she's already said she'll sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can then never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a higher and darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI must be turning over in his grave.



The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?












Some revolutionary lyrics - We're being fooled again

A diagram of the parallel EU Government in the UK.

The wiring of the EU in Britain EU subversion of our Government.

A link to

Our other site:

Common Purpose, training 18,000 of our new EU rulers at all levels of our government now.
As a word doc.

The Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill 2006 - government doesn't need Parliament.

Cromwell had something similar in the 1680's. Is there anyone out there who doesn't realise all the treaties and laws of a dictatorship, and more, are now enacted? And that all it takes is for a foreign power, the EU, to enforce them?

Do we want to be in Europe? Do we want to lose democratic government, the nations of Britain and England, and all our counties? Do we want to put ourselves in the EU, where we will be at the mercy of any dictator who chooses to control us? Isn't the answer obviously "No" ?

We can live again outside Europe
Outside the EU we can be a free and properly democratic nation. Free from Europe we could stop half our government spending being wasted, could save the 200 billion a year it costs us to be in Europe, repeal all its 107,000 regulations, and stop losing the 22 billion a year to Europe on our balance of payments. With those vast savings we could easily pay all our people a good living wage. According to the OECD we are the 4th strongest economy amongst the world's 205 independent nations, and we will make it handsomely.

We could leave the EU in 14 hours
The fastest an Act of Parliament has been drafted, passed by Parliament and signed by the Monarch was the abdication of King Edward 8th. It was done in 13.5 hours. We could repeal the 1972 European Communities Act and be out of Europe in just fourteen hours, if our traiterous MP's, Prime Minister and Queen so wished. So far they've illegally denied us the choice. We need to change that, but we may only have two years left before the final 6th treaty is signed.

Thank you. Please choose one of the six actions above and complete it.


Questions? Call David Noakes: 07974 437 097

but delete the three letters "del" -this is to stop automated spam.

The Westminster News


Please donate to help us spread the word:



    Paypal accepts credit cards.



The EU dictatorship: Poverty under a brutal police state.


This is:
Questions for Bush.

This site is Copyright David Noakes 1997-2007, All Rights Reserved, but permission to copy and republish is granted. 07974 437 097.

Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :








  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.



The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.


Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.


1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her 9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.


But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.


Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.


I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected

Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).


The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?


 For more details go to :


























Bank Of England The Banking Swindle























'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.


The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-













ADDED - MAY-2012




Let the people speak!




[Latest Addition - June07]






Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU






67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM






July 18-2007

































Home Rule for Scotland





[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]






  *   *   *