ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG UK.

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

Top Topics and Stats-ENGLAND FILE

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-23-1994-Official Website-June-23-2016-PART-8-9-10-11-12-13-14

 

JULY 23-FREEDOM WON-2016

 

WHY I WANT

OUT OF THE EU

 

I want out because I fear that our

NATIONAL IDENTITY

OUR WAY OF LIFE

and tradition of liberal democracy are under

THREAT

from the EU's rules on the

FREE MOVEMENT of PEOPLE

and its

INSANE

HUMAN RIGHTS REGIME

I WANT OUT

because I believe that

BRUSSEL'S

attempts to impose

UNIFORMITY

on hugely diverse peoples are holding economies back, destroying livelihoods and breeding dangerous ill-feelings between

NATIONS.

I WANT OUT

so that we can regain the right to elect those who make our laws-and to

DISMISS THEM IF THEY FAIL US

I'm sick of seeing my country infantilised by an

UNSACKABLE NANNY STATE.

IN A WORD

I WANT OUT BECAUSE I WANT

BRITAIN

[ENGLAND]

TO BE FREE

*

 

[We couldn't have put it better-Thank you!- Tom Utley.

TOM UTLEY: Oh dear. Is the fact my wife was a bus ... - Daily Mail-Friday, June 3,2016l

 

H.F.805

 

 

 NUCLEAR LETTER

 

Tories nuclear letter: It's civil war as Gove and Boris write ... - Daily Mail

by

Daniel Martin-Chief Political Correspondentail

It's civil war as Gove and Boris write to PM accusing him of damaging democracy with his lies over immigration.

 

Dear Dave,

This week the Office for National Statistics published migration statistics for 2015. Last year 270,000 people came to our country from the EU. Net migration overall was 184,000. That means we are adding a population the size of Oxford to the UK every year just from EU migration. This puts particular strain on public services.

We are particularly concerned about the impact of free movement in the future on public services. Class sizes will rise and waiting lists will lengthen if we don't  tackle free movement. As the Euro crisis continues, more people from Southern Europe will want to escape unemployment and austerity in their countries by coming to the UK. Their arrival will put further strain on schools and hospitals.

Last year, 77,000 jobseekers from the EU came to the UK. It's Government policy that the 'EU migrants should have a job offer before they come here.' But the EU did not agree to letting the UK implement that policy during the renegotiation of our membership.

It's not just the strain on public services which gives rise to cause for concern. We are call committed to improving wages for working people. But continued free movement for jobseekers will place considerable pressure on the wages of low paid British workers in the event of a vote to remain in the EU.  This is good for some of the multinationals funding the IN campaign. It is not good for British families struggling to make ends meet.

And the current EU approach to immigration isn't just bad for us economically, it is also bad in security and humanitarian terms.

Humanitarian

There is a direct security concern for all of us because the European Court of Justice can interfere with our ability to deport criminals and others whose presence here is not conducive to the public good. The case of Abu Hamza's daughter-in-law underlined the way EU institutions fetter our ability to deport convicted criminals.

[This refers the case of the Moroccan women, who has a British son, whose fight against deportation was boasted in February by the ECJ's advocate general's opinion that EU law means the UK cannot automatically deport her simply  because she has a criminal record unless she is deemed to pose  a 'serious' threat to society.]

Perhaps most worrying of all, the EU's policies are failing in humanitarian terms. The tragic scenes unfolding in the Mediterranean underline how badly the European union is handling population movements and migration pressures. People smugglers and organised criminals are exploiting this situation and the EU is failing to tackle this trade in human misery.

If we remain in the EU the situation is only likely to get worse. The European court of Justice can use the Charter of Fundamental Rights to overturn decisions of elected politicians on asylum policy. It is  now in charge of how we implement the crucial 1951 UN Convention on Refugees,. WE need a new approach on refugees but the EU's  institutions stand in the way.

There is also the basic lack of democratic consent for what is taking place. Voters were promised repeatedly at elections that net immigration could be cut to the tens of thousands. This promise is plainly not achievable as long as the UK is a member of the EU and the failure to keep it is corrosive of public trust in politics.

Given the public's desire for the facts ahead of the referendum, we would like you to confirm the following facts:

[A VOTE TO REMAIN]

A vote to remain is a vote to maintain permanently the EU Treaty principle of 'free movement of people'.

  A vote to remain is a vote to ensure that we must admit economic migrants from the EU, whether or not they have a job offer.

A vote to remain is a vote to affirm the European Court of Justice's ultimate authority over whether we can remove persons whose presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good-in this and other respects

WE DO NOT CONTROL OUR BORDERS.

Immigration

A vote to remain is a vote to leave the European Court of Justice able to use the Charter of Fundamental Rights to strike down decisions of the UK Government and Parliament about asylum and immigration policy.

A vote to remain is a vote for the UK to continue supporting the EU's failed policies to deal with the tragic crisis in the Mediterranean.

We think that it is fundamentally important that Immigration policy has democratic consent. We believe that the safer choice is to

VOTE TO LEAVE

ON

23 JUNE

 

AND ENSURE THAT THE PUBLIC CAN VOTE FOR THOSE WHO DETERMINE BRITAIN'S IMMIGRATION POLICY

We look forward to your response.

 

Yours sincerely,

Michael, Boris and Gisela

*

[We have provided CAPS and HIGHLIGHTING to EMPHASIZE some SALIENT POINTS. ]

VOTE LEAVE- [THE EU]

ON

JUNE 23-2016

TO REGAIN YOUR

FREEDOM

AND

FREE INDEPENDENT

NATION STATE.

*

'The cause of Freedom is the cause of God!'

EDMUND BURKE, 78.

*

Monday, May 30,2016

 

 
 August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN.

These are the 'BIRTHRITE of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE...

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED INHERITANCE AND IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE.

[TO BE CONTINUED]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MAY 30-2016

*  *  *
 

The Commonwealth Realms  V  The Constitution for Europe. - Part 1

 

inasmuch as the Crown is the symbol of the free association of the members of the British Commonwealth of nations… united by the common allegiance to the Crown”

 

The Statute of Westminster 1931

 

A Paper delivered to a meeting held in the House of Lords London on the 21st April 2004.

[ WE WERE THERE]

By

 

Philip Benwell MBE

   

The Commonwealth Realms

 

Antigua and Barbuda          New Zealand

Australia                                Papua New Guinea

Bahamas                                Saint Kitts

Barbados                                Saint Vincent

Belize                                      Solomon Islands

Canada                                   Tobago Tuvalu

Grenada                                  Tonga

Nevis Saint Lucia                    United Kingdom

 

 

*          *          *

 

My Lords, Ladies & Gentlemen,

 

My task tonight is not to take sides on whether we should be in or out of Europe, but rather to explore what I consider to be the real danger to the Commonwealth of Australia and the fourteen Commonwealth Realms.

 

The issues relating to individual sovereignties are indeed complex, particularly since the Statute of Westminster of 1931 which was enacted to provide for the maturing independence of those former colonies who remained ‘under The Crown of the United Kingdom’ which were termed ‘Dominions’, so named in 1907 as ‘the self-governing dominions beyond the seas’ to replace the term ‘Great Colonies’ and which today comprise the nations of Australia, Canada and New Zealand, each having unique constitutions with precedents and conventions developed to suit their individual environments and peoples.

 

For instance, Canada is still essentially a ‘Royalist’ nation whereas Australia is not; and this is probably due to the comparative physical closeness of Canada to the United Kingdom and its greater number of Royal Visits, a privilege Australia has little experience of, due to our distance and the length of travel time to reach us.

 

This may explain why Australia has a more constitutional – and lesser Royalist-approach to our Monarchy than Canada.  We tend to recognise The Crown as but an ingredient –albeit vital – within our system of Government.  It is this more sterile approach that has led Monarchists to explain that the Governor-General is effectively Australia’s Head of State with the Queen as Sovereign, whereas Canada still unashamedly recognises The Queen as their head of State.

 

In the years leading up to 1931, the former British Prime Minister, Arthur, later lord Balfour, formulated a treaty between the United Kingdom and the then Dominions to encompass the views expressed during the preceding Imperial Conferences, particularly that of 1926.  The Conferences had been held in London between the United Kingdom Government and representatives of the Governments of the Dominions who were calling for a relaxation of control, which continued to be exerted by the British Government following their independence, particularly with regard to the decision of who would nominate their respective Governors-General.

 

It was this Treaty, which was consolidated into an Act of the British Government called the Statute of Westminster, which was adopted by the then Dominions, which included Australia, Canada, South Africa and New Zealand.

 

The independent sovereignty of the Realms was clearly shown at the time of the Constitutional Referendum in 1999, for if Australia was not in charge of its own affairs, how else could the people themselves decide whether or not to retain The Crown?

 

The concerns now facing Australia go far beyond the Republican / Monarchist divisions caused by the Referendum.  Whilst the British Parliament no longer has any right to legislate over the affairs of Australia, it is fettered from taking certain actions relating to the Crown of the United Kingdom and is specifically barred from legislating in matters of the Succession and the Royal Styles and Titles.

 

In Zurich in September 1946, Churchill, still in Opposition, explained his motivation in working for Union: “When the Nazi power was broken, I asked myself what was the best advice I could give my fellow citizens in our ravaged and exhausted continent.  My counsel to Europe can be given in a single word: Unite!”

 

[Winston Churchill also stated in his Zurich speech his feelings of his own country when he said:

 

We are with Europe but not a part of it.

 

We are linked but not combined.

 

We’re interested but not absorbed”]

 

*

  

In Volume IV of his ‘The Second World War’ Churchill wrote:

“Hard as it is to say now, I trust that the European Family may act united as one under a Council of Europe…I look forward to a United States of Europe in which the barriers between nations will be greatly minimised and unrestricted travel will be possible. I hope to see the economy of Europe studied as a whole.”

 

It was thus that Churchill founded the United Europe Movement in 1947 and it was Churchill who brought together persons of influence to create a bi –partisan committee and it was Churchill who persuaded France to allow a defeated Germany into the Alliance.  Indeed had not Churchill thrown his weight behind the early meetings the entire concept of a united Europe may have become a forgotten segment of history?

 

Churchill, of course, knew that Britain had to provide the leadership in bringing the war-torn nations of Europe together and that in ding so there would be some loss of sovereignty.  Britain has been entering into treaties for nigh on a thousand years or more, all of which have resulted in a loss of some sovereignty.

 

There is a statement attributed to Churchill: 

 “If the choice for Britain is Europe or the open sea, then Britain must choose the open sea.”

 

This, however, has been taken from a conversation Churchill had with de Gaulle in 1944 and is often quoted out of context to indicate his opposition to European Union.  It is not necessary to take Churchill’s comments out of context for it was never in his mind that Britain would ever become a State subservient to a United Europe.

 

And certainly not at the expense of the Empire and Commonwealth, but rather that Britain had to take the lead, jointly with the United States of America, in the reconstruction of Europe.  [Elsewhere in our Bulletins we have emphasised that the USA from the beginning of their support for a United Europe wished to include the UK in a Federal Union.]  

When in Government, Churchill seemed to lose interest in European Union.  This was possibly because the Marshall Plan was working, but more probably because he was then in full command of the facts and he vehemently disagreed with the more extensive plans of pro-Unionists and would never be convinced that the sacrifice of British Sovereignty would be worth anything Europe could offer Britain.  It was not until Harold Macmillan became Conservative Prime Minister that Union was pursued by Britain with full vigour at whatever cost.

 

Macmillan, of course, had been with Churchill as Churchill sought solutions to rebuild a war-torn Europe, but unlike Churchill, Macmillan never took into account the dangers of full integration.

 

Macmillan was not the British Bulldog that Churchill was.  He was a Conservative as such and in his younger days had flirted with many different ideologies, including Mosley’s National Socialism and Roman Catholicism.

 

For over fifty years, the British Parliament has been debating and legislating over matters pertaining to its entry into Union with Europe.  That there are economic benefits to Britain in a European Trading Bloc cannot be denied.  That there are disadvantages also cannot be denied.  Today (21st April 2004) however, we are not just talking about an economic Union, but a political one, one that denies, indeed saps, the natural right of member states to legislate and administer themselves without external interference or authority.  It is this, which is the greatest challenge to the independence of Britain’s sovereignty, and it is this, which provides a possible danger to the integrity of the Crown of the United Kingdom, without which the independent constitutions of the fifteen Commonwealth Realms cannot survive.  That is the question to be analysed tonight.

 

End of Part 1

Click Here for Part 2

 

*

21st April 2004.

H.F.700/1

*  *  *
ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

 

In 1962,

 Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality 

 HITLER'S plan for Europe

 under

 

GERMAN CONTROL.

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 
 

VOTE LEAVE ON JUNE 23

AND SAVE

FREEDOM

FOR

EVERYONE

At another time in England's history when there is division within  we quote the words of Oliver Cromwell to his Second Parliament in 1658 when after 10 years of war  followed by 6 years of PEACE he made a plea of UNITY!.

'...Let us have one heart and soul; one mind to maintain the honest and just rights of this nation;-not to pretend to them, to the destruction of our Peace, to the destruction of our Nation...

[In 1658 for treason heads rolled but in 2016 after June 23 heads are to be crowned. This tells you much of the man pretending to govern the affairs of our once respected and   

 FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND]

*

Words of Lord Fauconberg:

The Genius of England no longer soars Sunward, world defiant, like an eagle through the storms, 'mewing her mighty youth,' as John Milton saw her do: the Genius of England, much like a greedy Ostrich intent on provender and a whole skin mainly, stands with its other extremity Sunward; with its Ostrich-head stuck into the readiest bush, of old Church tippits, King-clocks, on what other' sheltering Fallacy there may be , and so awaits the issue,. The issue has been slow; but it is now seen as inevitable. No Ostrich, intent on gross terrene provender, and sticking its heads into Fallacies, but will be awakened one day,- in a terrible a-posteriori manner. if not otherwise!-- AWAKE before it comes to that; gods and men bid us AWAKE! The Voices of our Fathers, with thousandfold stern monition to one and all ,

BID US AWAKE!

On the death of

 ENGLAND'S

TRUE LORD PROTECTOR

OLIVER CROMWELL

3rd September,1658 

Oliver Cromwell's LETTER and SPEECHES

by

THOMAS CARLYLE

May 1888

 

*

'When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.

EDMUND BURKE.

*

'Slaves cannot breathe in England; if their lungs/Receive our air, that moment they are free;/ They touch our country, and their shackles fall.'

William Cowper.

HOW CAN ENGLAND NOT BE FREE?

*

JUNE 23-PT 12/14-2016

(Please note: that the above JUNE 23 x 14 monthly bulletins are additional to the usual x 6 JUNE monthly bulletins to enable us to bring forward relevant information from over 13 years.)

 

Brexit immigration revolution! Boris and Gove pledge to bring in tough Australian- style points system to slash arrivals from EU and bar entry to migrants who do not speak English if UK votes Out

 

By Jason Groves for the Daily Mail - May 31st 2016, 11:07:26 pm

 

Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and Priti Patel say they will insist on a tough Australian-style points system to finally meet the Tory pledge to cut net immigration to below 100,000.

'If we implement these principles, for the first time in a generation it will be possible for [politicians to keep their promises in immigration'

Boris Johnson, Michael Grove, Prit Patel and Gisela Stewart

 

   *   Two polls suggest the LEAVE campaign has moved ahead of the REMAIN side;

   *  It emerged new border patrol vessels will not be in place until the end of 2017, with ministers also facing criticism for axing deal for spy planes to help spot immigrants.

   *    CCTV images from Dymchurch, Kent suggested the coastal resort is now a gateway for people smugglers;

   *    Pro-Brexit Cabinet minister Chris Grayling warned there was a danger the Channel could take over from the Mediterranean as the focus of the migrant crisis

  *  Mr Gove and Mr Johnson said Brexit would allow the Government to scrap Vat on fuel, cutting £2billion from bills.

The Out campaigners statement today adds; 'The automatic right of all EU citizens to come and live and in the UK will end, as will EU control over vital aspects of our social security system.'

Full article

 HOW THE TOUGHER RULES COULD WORK

Britain already operates a partial points-based  scheme, but applies it ONLY to migrants from OUTSIDE the EU,

Under a complex system of tiers, non-EU migrants are assessed according to skills and earning power in the UK.

From April this year, migrants have to show they would earn at least £35,000 a year.

But exceptions are made for students and 'temporary' migrants who plan to stay in the UK for less than a year.

And under Brussels laws, none of these rules ca be applied to EU migrants.

Critics claim this means the highly skilled from outside the EU are rejected in favour of unskilled labourers from inside the Brussels club.

But a study by Oxford University's Migration Observatory last month suggested three-quarters of EU migrants would fail to qualify if the points system was applied to them.

Researchers said up to 94 per cent of EU workers currently employed in retail, hotels and restaurants would fail to meet existing entry requirements.

LEAVE campaigners are today calling for less bureaucratic points system for all migrants who would have to show they are 'suitable for the job'

The number of work permits for skilled migrants coming to Britain from outside Europe is capped at 20,700 a year.

There are a number of other routes for non-EU migrants, including family ties, higher education, company transfers, and, of course, asylum claims.

Full article

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JUNE 1-2016

H .F.799

 

THE

BIGGEST LIE

OF ALL

 Daily Mail

SATURDAY ESSAY by DOMINIC SANDBROOK

 

 

THE PM says Brexit could lead to genocide and war, claiming it's the EU that's kept the PEACE.

The TRUTH is Europe's now more riven with HATRED and STRIFE than at any time since 1945.

 BECAUSE OF BRUSSELS.

It was perhaps the biggest lie of all. This week, David Cameron provoked universal derision by claiming that Europe risks sliding back into war and genocide if Britain votes to

LEAVE THE EU.

He argued that it was only because of the EU that peace had been maintained on the continent over the past  70 years.

He couldn't have been more wrong: for the fact is that europe is now riven by more hatreds, divisions and conflicts than at any time since 1945-and they are treatening to tear the continent apart.

And, of course, the irony is that the main cause of this potentially catastrophic situation is Brussels' failed immigration and economic policies.

Here, DOMINIC SANDBROOK explains why...

CHILLING RISE OF THE FAR RIGHT...

NOW RAZOR WIRE FENCES GO UP...

LOATHING OF NEIGHBOURS...

HATRED IN A DIVIDED NATION...

POVERTY AND SIMMERING RAGE...

LE PEN POISED TO TAKE CONTROL...

NEW THREAT OF FINANCIAL CHAOS...

GERMAN CONTEMPT FOR THEIR LEADER...

DICTATOR WHO COULD SPARK A WAR...

Full article

DAILY MAIL, Saturday, May 14-2016

H.F.781

 

WHY WE MUST!

LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC

NAZI-PLANNED EU.

No 1

 

If we really want to escape the grip of human rights law-we must quit the EU.

 

Daily Mail

Monday, May 15,2006.

 

THE

 

Melanie

Phillips

Column

 

Once again, the Prime Minister is trying to surf a wave of popular outrage by announcing he will take action - which on closer examination proves to be mere froth - not least because his own policy lies at the very heart of the problem.

 

Thus Tony Blair has spoken out against ‘an abuse of common sense’

In the way the human rights law has been used to allow nine Afghan hijackers to remain in Britain, or free a rapist from prison only for him to commit MURDER.

 

BUT it is his own human rights law, which has quite simply altered the entire legal and moral culture of this country, and taken an axe to

COMMON SENSE

 

The Judge in last week’s Afghan ruling has been roundly pilloried. BUT common sense in this case was trounced in

2004

-when an immigration tribunal ruled on human rights grounds that it was too dangerous to send the hijackers back to Afghanistan

-       even though the Taliban, from whom they fled, had been replaced by a Western-backed government.

 

The root of the problem here is not the wretched judge BUT the Government itself, which dragged its feet over the case for years. This was because it was paralysed by the fact that

 

HUMAN RIGHTS LAW

 

-described only last week by the Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith, as the Government’s ‘greatest achievement’ -has created a culture of legalised lunacy.

 

Disruptive.

 

Detectives across the country are refusing to issue ‘wanted’ posters for missing foreign criminals because they say they do not want to breach their right to privacy, and risk lawsuits by releasing their names and photographs.

 

The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency routinely shreds the driving records of speeding and drunken drivers because bureaucrats are afraid of human rights law. That means thousands of drivers with a bad history escape with lighter punishments because Courts cannot learn the full truth about their past.

 

It is no use saying that such judgments misread human rights law since, because such law consists of a balancing act between competing ‘rights’ requiring the Courts to arbitrate between them, no one can be sure how any disruptive cases will end up.

 

The fact is that ruling after human rights ruling has turned right and wrong on their heads and radically undermined the covenant of responsibility between the INDIVIDUAL and the STATE.

 

To take an egregious example, human rights law has DESTROYED this country’s ability to CONTROL its OWN BORDERS.

 

The Courts have used the ‘human right’ to family life to reward

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.

 

Their absurdly generalised interpretation of the prohibition against torture - which wrenched this principle out of ALL recognition - has made it all but impossible to deport those foreigners who threaten this country’s security.

 

The LAW LORDS’ perverse reading of ‘DISCRIMINATION’ last year has meant that such suspects can’t even be locked up pending removal from this country.

 

WHAT KIND OF HUMAN RIGHTS ARE THESE,

 

-which actually force a country to destroy its own security along with its principles of

CITIZENSHIP

 

FAIRNESS

 

And

 

OBLIGATION?

 

At the weekend, Mr Blair said he was considering fresh legislation to prevent future Court rulings from ‘overruling the Government’. here lie the first clues to the fact that these are likely to be empty words.

 

FIRST, He’s only considering any change.

 

SECOND, human rights law doesn’t give the COURTS the POWER to overrule the GOVERNMENT.

All they can do is declare legislation incompatible with human rights law, thus putting pressure on MINSTERS. So Mr Blair has given us a straw man, which he promises he will knock down.

 

Then look at the way in which Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer [Blair’s old flat-mate], has been twisting and turning. There might need to be legislation, he said, to ensure that human rights law would have no effect on

PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES.

 

PARALYSED

 

BUT the whole point of human rights law is that it is supposed to be an overarching set of principles. So it CAN’T be CHANGED.

And in any case, what kind of overarching principles are these which in the Lord Chancellor’s opinion, actually imperil

PUBLIC SAFETY.

 

Lord Falconer appears to be saying that it’s not human rights law that’s at fault, but certain officials who are misunderstanding it. This is completely and lamentably to miss the point.

 

It’s not merely that this law has paralysed public bodies such as the police and the intelligence service, which say they can barely move for fear of falling foul of it.

 

More fundamentally still, human rights law has driven

 

JUSTICE

 

MORALITY

 

And

 

SOCIAL ORDER

 

-off the rails altogether.

 

It has acted as a grievance charter fuelling the ‘victim culture’ in which all minorities are seen as incapable of being held responsible for their actions.

 

As such, it has become a principle weapon against the

 

CULTURE and IDENTITY of the NATION.

-       and by transferring power to the JUDGES, has delivered a powerful blow against DEMOCRACY.

 

Abolishing the HUMAN RIGHTS ACT would certainly help put a brake on that process. BUT the problem would remain that Britain is signed up to the

 

European Convention on Human Rights,

 

-       which would still have supremacy over our laws.

 

Look for example at the Chahal judgment by the European Court of Human Rights, the key ruling preventing Britain deporting foreign undesirables.

 

This held that, if a person faced torture or inhuman treatment abroad, the risk to that individual from deporting him could not even be balanced against the risk he might pose to the country, which allowed him to stay.

 

IN other words, this ruling was a specific attack on the right of the country to decide what was in its citizens’ own best interests either to derogate from bits of this CONVENTION - as every other signatory BUT Britain has in fact done - or leave altogether.

 

Undemocratic.

 

Yesterday, Lord Falconer gave the game away when he acknowledged that- although the Human Rights Convention has separate origins from the European Union - no country can be a member of the EU unless he is also a CONVENTION signatory.

 

TO SOME OF US, OF COURSE, that is precisely WHY we should leave the EU, in order to

 

RESTORE

 

-OUR POWERS

of

 

SELF-GOVERNMENT

 

And

 

DEMOCRACY

 

But the fact that we are the Human rights prisoner of the EU is why this GOVERNMENT will never address the deformities of human rights law.

 

The usual suspects scream that it would be unthinkable to abolish ‘human rights’. How absurd. Real human rights are very different. Indeed, before ‘human rights’ law took hold we were rather

 

MORE FREE,

 

-not less.

 

INSTEAD, we would be abolishing the arbitrary and undemocratic power of the JUDGES to impose upon us a particular agenda [which is un-English] -far from universal.

In the remarkable words last year of the senior Law Lord, Lord Bingham, human rights law existed to protect vulnerable minorities - who are sometimes disliked, resented or despised -against the howls of ‘majority opinion’.

 

It would seem to follow that - for the JUDICIARY - Afghan hijackers, murders and other criminals are vulnerable minorities’, while the [Peace-loving majority] who are their potential victims have NO HUMAN RIGHTS at all.

 

Extricating OUR NATION from this MESS would undoubtedly be complicated and difficult. BUT UNLESS WE DO SO, we are unlikely much longer to have a NATION worthy of the NAME.

* * *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets are ours!]

MAY/06

 

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?

*

There are well over 1000 bulletins on our website on the COLLECTIVIST-SOVIETISED UNDEMOCRATIC NAZI-PLANNED EU

 

 

Q&A: The Lisbon Treaty-2008

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian the late TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

H.F.645

 

Brought forward from 23 April 2008
 

 
 
 

 

 

DAVID CAMERON SAYS!

 

Britain less secure outside the EU?

How does the PM keep a straight face

 

By

DOMINIC LAWSON

 

*[Well he would wouldn't HE!-?]

EXTRACT

...As David Owen points out, if EU leaders pursue the idea of a-European army  'even  planning a deployment against the interests of the US.' this is' a certain recipe for the US, to withdraw more forces from Europe, in the process turning NATO into a mere talking shop and effectively withdrawing any US responsibilities for COMMON DEFENCE'.

NOW THAT REALLY DOES SCARE ME

As this debate about our relationship with the EU[blunders! on] gets noisier, bear one or two other facts in mind. Our status as a permanent member of the UN Security Council has

NOTHING WHATEVER TO DO WITH OUR BEING A MEMBER OF THE EU.

It predated that and would post-date

IT!

Above all, in the increasingly cyber-based nature of modern military strategy, Britain's SECURITY is most vitally maintained and enhanced by our

MEMBERSHIP OF 'FIVE EYES'-

the intelligence-gathering co-operation comprising the

US,UK, CANADA, NEW ZEALAND and AUSTRALIA.

[OUR TRUE DESTINY IS AND HAS ALWAYS BEEN WITH OUR OWN-FRIENDS WITH ALL - BUT CLOSE COLLEAGUES ALWAYS WITH THOSE WHO SHARE-OUR LAW-CUSTOM-FAITH & FREE ENTERPRISE.]

Truly, as Owen says, the idea that our military security would be weakened by leaving the EU

'DESERVES TO BE LAUGHED OUT OF COURT'.

 

Full article.-

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JANUARY 11, 2016

 

H F 680

 

 

 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

Monday, May 23,2016

CASE FOR BREXIT BY A MAN WHO REALLY KNOWS

Since the start of the referendum campaign, Remain supporters-led by the Prime Minister- have tried to portray those who want to leave the EU as dishonest, deluded, or downright mad.

Last week for example, Chancellor George Osborne sneeringly described Brexit supporters as a bunch of conspiracy theorists who believe he and Mr Cameron are part of a global stitch-up' aimed art terrifying British voters into sticking with Brussels.

'The next thing you know they will be accusing us of faking the moon landings, kidnapping Shergar , and covering up the existence of the Loch Ness Monster,' he said. All highly amusing of course, but will they use the same language about the latest recruit to the

 LEAVE CAMP?

Steve Hilton, Mr Cameron's closest friend in politics, godfather to one of his children, his former strategy chief and man who persuaded him to stand as party leader declares in today's Mail the the EU has been  and that Britain can 'corruptly captured' by a self-serving ELITE! and that BRITAIN can ONLY THRIVE by being OUTSIDE IT.

In a shattering blow to his former boss, Mr Hilton says the

UK is 'UNGOVERNABLE'

as a

DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY

inside the

EU'

which has become 'so complicated ,so secretive, so impenetrable that it's way beyond the ability of any  British Government to make it work to our advantage'.

Unlike some of the superannuated  former Tory advisers wheeled out by Remain, Mr Hilton was until recently at

THE VERY HEART OF GOVERNMENT.

Known as Mr Cameron's guru', he is the ultimate

DOWNING STREET INSIDER.

So he has seen with his own eyes how Brussels stifles

ENTERPRISE-

TRADE

COMPETITION

He describes how it works for big business and against

DEMOCRACY

and concludes

IT WILL NEVER REFORM.

 

Doesn't this searingly honest analysis put the scaremongering of the  Remain camp to shame? For all their apocalypic warnings of economic meltdown and mass unemployment, they have still not put forward a positive case for staying in the EU

By contrast, here is Mr Hilton's positive case for

GETTING OUT

'I believe it is [about] taking back power from

ARROGANT

UNACCOUNTABLE,

HUBRISTIC ELITES

and putting it where it belongs-

IN PEOPLES HANDS.'

Does that sound deluded, or just

DEMOCRATIC.

*

Full article.

H.F.790

 



 



Was Britain Taken Into The EU Illegally?
 


 
Vernon Coleman


Many constitutional experts believe that Britain isn't actually a member of the European Union since our apparent entry was in violation of British law and was, therefore invalid.

In enacting the European Communities Bill through an ordinary vote in the House of Commons, Ted Heath's Government breached the constitutional convention which requires a prior consultation of the people (either by a general election or a referendum) on any measure involving constitutional change. The general election or referendum must take place before any related parliamentary debate. (Britain has no straightforward written constitution. But, the signing of the Common Market entrance documents was, without a doubt, a breach of the spirit of our constitution.)

Just weeks before the 1970 general election which made him Prime Minister, Edward Heath declared that it would be wrong if any Government contemplating membership of the European Community were to take this step without `the full hearted consent of Parliament and people'.

However, when it came to it

 Heath

didn't have a referendum because opinion polls at the time (1972) showed that the British people were hugely opposed (by a margin of two to one) against joining the Common Market. Instead,

Heath

 merely signed the documents that took us into what became the European Union on the basis that Parliament alone had passed the European Communities Bill of 1972.

Some MPs have subsequently claimed that `Parliament can do whatever it likes'. But that isn't true, of course. Parliament consists of a number of individual MPs who have been elected by their constituents to represent them. Political parties are not recognised in our system of government and Parliament does not have the right to change the whole nature of Britain's constitution. We have (or are supposed to have) an elective democracy not an elective dictatorship. Parliament may, in law and in day to day issues, be the sovereign power in the state, but the electors are (in the words of Dicey's `Introduction for the Study of the Law of the Constitution' published in 1885) `the body in which sovereign power is vested'. Dicey goes on to point out that `in a political sense the electors are the most important part of, we may even say are actually, the sovereign power, since their will is under the present constitution sure to obtain ultimate obedience.' Bagehot, author of The English Constitution, 1867, describes the nation, through Parliament, as `the present sovereign'.

In 1972, when Heath decided to take Britain into the Common Market, he used Parliament's legal sovereignty to deny and permanently limit the political sovereignty of the electorate. Heath and Parliament changed the basic rules and they did not have the right (legal or moral) to do that. The 1972 European Communities Bill wasn't just another Act of Parliament. Heath's Bill used Parliament's legal sovereignty, and status as representative of the electorate, to deny the fundamental rights of the electorate.

Precedents show that the British constitution (which may not be written and formalised in the same way as the American constitution is presented) but which is, nevertheless, enshrined and codified in the Magna Carta (1215), the Petition of Right (1628), the Bill of Rights (1689) and the Act of Settlement (1701) requires Parliament to consult the electorate directly where constitutional change which would affect their political sovereignty is in prospect. (The 1689 Bill of Rights contains the following oath:

 

 

`I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority within this Realm.' Since this Bill has not been repealed it is clear that every treaty Britain has signed with the EU has been illegal.)

So, for example, Parliament was dissolved in 1831/2 to obtain the electorate's authority for the Reform Bill and again in 1910 following the Lord's rejection of the Liberal Finance Bill.

In 1975, when the Government changed, Harold Wilson sought to put right the clear constitutional error by organising a retrospective referendum (something quite unprecedented in British history) designed to obtain the permission of the British people for Britain to join something it had already `joined'.

Wilson's referendum was inspired solely by the realisation that the consent of the electorate ought first to have been obtained before we joined the EEC. The lack of legitimacy of the European Communities Act brought about the decision by the incoming Prime Minister and Labour leadership that a referendum should be held in preference to yet another general election.

But, almost inevitably, the question asked in the referendum was also illegal since voters were asked: `Do you think that the United Kingdom should stay in the European Community (the Common Market)?'

The problem was that since Heath had ignored the constitution duties and requirements of Parliament and had signed the entrance documents illegally the words `stay in' were deceptive. We couldn't stay in the EEC because, constitutionally, we had never entered. We couldn't enter the Common Market because Parliament did not have the right to sign away our sovereignty.

The referendum Wilson organised to remedy Heath's constitutional breach misled the electorate on a simple constitutional issue and was, therefore, itself illegal. (Wilson's referendum was passed after a good deal of very one-sided propaganda was used to influence public opinion. If the nation had voted against our `continued' membership of the EEC the political embarrassment for all politicians would have been unbearable.)

Attempts through the courts to annul our membership of the European Union on the basis that Parliament acted improperly have failed because Parliament, through its legal sovereignty, is the source of the law in Britain and the courts are, therefore, unable to challenge any Parliamentary Act.

Only Parliament can reclaim the legislative powers that Heath and subsequent Prime Ministers have handed to the European Union.

And so, only when Parliament is filled with honest politicians (not inevitably an oxymoron) who are not controlled by the private party system will the mistake be rectified and our membership annulled.
 

[In May 2015 at the GENERAL ELECTION you will have YOUR SAY! for the return of YOUR! once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE by voting the traitourous GANG OF THREE out of YOUR PARLIAMENT.]


Britain's entry into the Common Market (later to be transformed into the EU) was also illegal for another reason. The Prime Minister who signed the entry documents, Edward Heath, later confirmed that he had lied to the British people about the implications of the Treaty.

Heath told the electorate that signing the Treaty of Rome would lead to no essential loss of National Sovereignty but later admitted that this was a lie. Astonishingly, Heath said he lied because he knew that the British would not approve of him signing the Treaty if they knew the truth. Heath told voters that the EEC was merely a free trade association. But he was lying through his teeth. He knew that the original members of the EEC had a long-standing commitment to political union and the step by step creation of a European super-state.

Edward Heath received a substantial financial bribe for taking Britain into the EU when he was Prime Minister. (Heath was no stranger to bribery. One of his aides bribed a senior Labour Party official £25,000 for details of Harold Wilson's election tactics.) The reward of £35,000, paid personally to Heath and at the time a substantial sum of money, was handed over to him (in the guise of The Charlemagne Prize) for signing the Treaty of Rome.

Because of Heath's dishonesty we never actually joined the Common Market. And so all the subsequent treaties that were signed were illegal.

Britain's Treason Act (1351) is (at the time of writing) still in place. It states `that treason is committed when a man be adherent to the King's enemies in his realm, giving them aid and comfort in the realm'.

And under the Treason Felony Act (1848) it is treason if `any person whatsoever shall, within the United Kingdom or without, devise or intend to deprive our most gracious Lady the Queen (Elizabeth) from the style, honour or Royal Name of the Imperial crown of the United Kingdom.'

Our membership of the European Union will mean the end of the United Kingdom. So, since our membership of the European Union will doubtless `deprive our most gracious Lady the Queen from the style, honour or Royal Name of the Imperial crown of the United Kingdom' Britain's entry into the Common Market, under Edward Heath's signature, was null and void.

Heath committed an act of treason. He betrayed the Queen and he deliberately misled the British people.

Does any of this really matter to politicians?

Is there any hope that Parliament will repeal the 1972 European Communities Act and restore sovereignty to the people? Not in the immediate future.

But the errors made by Heath and Wilson mean that when we want to leave the EU it will be very easy.

Because, officially, we never joined.

An independent British Parliament would simply have to pass one short Act of Parliament and give notice to the EU and we would be out of this accursed club.

Copyright Vernon Coleman 2011
Taken from Vernon Coleman's book OFPIS (for details of how to purchase a copy see the bookshop on this site.)
 

Home

 

Was Britain Taken Into The EU Illegally? - Vernon Coleman

 

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

*  *  *

 

 
RIP 

IN 2009 WE FACE THE DEMISE OF A NATION STATE OF 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING. THE WORLDS OLDEST PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY BROUGHT DOWN BY THOSE WHO HAD TAKEN THE

SACRED OATH

WHICH EVEN PARLIAMENT CANNOT REPEAL WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE. IT HAS BEEN THE TREACHERY OF THE QUEEN-HOUSE OF LORDS-HOUSE OF COMMONS AND AN UNPATRIOTIC AND TREASONABLE JUDICIARY WHICH WITH THE COMPLACENCY OF THE MAJORITY OF CITIZENS IN OUR ISLAND HOME [UNTIL QUITE RECENTLY] WHICH HAS BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH BASE TREACHERY.   

(2009)

H F-SP-9

 

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND HIGHLIGHTING  ARE OURS!]

 

DECEMBER-2014

 

H.F.679H

 
 

Daily Mail

 

 The multi-cultural hand-wringers sounding the death knell for

[ENGLAND ]

Britain as a Christian nation...

 

 

by DAMIAN THOMPSON

 

 

EXTRACT

Now it's official-Britain [ENGLAND] is no longer a Christian society and needs a 'new settlement for religion in the UK' recognising our secular multicultural diversity.

'Socially divisive' faith schools must be phased out and King Charles 111's coronation should be a multi-faith affair.

[Of course

Charles

will be delighted.]

That's the verdict, published with a fanfare yesterday of the Commission on Religion and Belief in British [ENGLISH] Public Life, chaired by the Rt Hon Baroness Butler Sloss of Marsh Green G B E, the First female Lord Justice of Appeal.

The commission's patrons include the Rt Hon Lord Williams of Oystermouth -i.e., Rowan Williams, former Arch bishop of Canterbury; the Rt Hon Lord Woolf CH, former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales; and Sir Iqbal Sacranie OBE, former secretary of the Muslim Council of Britain.

Pompous

Lord Williams, Lord Woolf and Sir Iqbal are among the most distinguished representatives of ,respectively, the Christian, Jewish and Muslim communities in this country.

Life peers, Emeritus professors Royal decorations, Blimey!

These are very , very eminent people who, if they dressed up in their academic robes and medals, would look like a court of Ruritania in a comic opera. When  such Establishment figures decree the death of

CHRISTIAN BRITAIN [ENGLAND]...

*

Traditions

[To be continued]

*

 

Discredited

Ignoring this, Lady Butler Sloss's secular Muslim alliance and its grand plan for the de-Christianising Britain [ENGLAND] envisages vast changes that would alter the fabric of this country's history.

[To Be continued]

Full Article - HERE!

 

 

'Christianity, rightly understood, is identical with the highest philosophy; the essential doctrines of Christianity are necessary and eternal truths of reason.'

*

'Christianity is not a theory or speculation, but a life; not a philosophy of life, but a life and a living process.'

*

' I have known what the enjoyments and advantages of this life are, and what are the more refined pleasures which learning and intellectual power can bestow; and with all the experience that more than three-score years can give, I now, on the eve of my departure, declare to you that health is a good blessing; competence obtained by honourable industry is a great blessing; and a great blessing it is, to have kind, faithful and loving friends and relatives; but that the greatest of all blessings, as it is the most ennobling of all privileges is to be a Christian.'-

Coleridge ,Samuel Taylor (1772-1834) Eng poet and critic.

*

'Give Christianity a common law trial; submit the evidence pro and con to an impartial jury under the direction of a competent court, and the vverdict will assuredly be in its favor.-

Chief Justice Gibson.

*

Christianity is the companion of liberty in all its conflicts-the cradle of its infancy and the divine source of its claims.-

De Tocqueville

*

The moral and religious system which Jesus Christ has transmitted to us, is the best the world has ever seen or can see.

'He who shall; introduce into public affairs the principles of primitive Christiany, will revolutionize the world.'-

Benjamin Franklin.

*

'Christianity is the basis of republican government, its bond of cohesion, and its life-giving Law- More than the Magna Carta itself the Gospels are the roots of English liberty.- That Magna Carta and the Petition of Right, with our completing Declaration was possible because the Gospels had been before them.'-

 R. S .Storrs.

*

'Whatever men may think of religion the historic fact is, that in proportion as the institutions of Christianity lose their hold upon the multitudes, the fabric of society is in peril.-'

A. T. Pierson

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 8-2014

H F 647

 

ISIS = Israeli Secret Intelligence Service
    by KEN O'KEEFE



(
11-17-15)Ken OKeefe Press TV Commentary-Paris False Flag

Ken O'Keefe discusses "who is ISIS" and the absurdity of what the mainstream media is telling us in this latest false flag manipulation brought to you by the powers that be.

[ISIS = How ISIS is the brainchild of the USA in association with SAUDI ARABIA and others.]..


Other Top Stories

ISIS = Israeli Secret Intelligence Service by KEN O'KEEFE
Suicide Bombers Are Total Propaganda B.S. by JIM STONE FREELANCE
War Veterans Give Back 'Cheap Tokens', Er, Medals by YOU TUBE
CIA Torturer Jose Rodriguez Brags About Torture by PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
Code Pink Challenges John Brennan on Drone Warfare by MEDEA BENJAMIN (CODE PINK.ORG)
Wacky DoJ: Take Pictures? You Could Be a Terrorist by PUBLIC INTELLIGENCE
 
 H.F.646
 
 
 
 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for Proportional Representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

 

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

&

 

WE ASK ON OCTOBER 30,2015

WHAT PROGRESS have the SMALL PARTIES MADE to COMBINE to FIGHT this

GROSS INJUSTICE?

 

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

 

*

 

Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

*

 

[As we have stated over many years we have been suspicious of UKIP leadership particularly of Nigel Farage who though he has the necessary 'gift of the gab' and charisma for the job-he has admitted  he has a History of working for over 20 years in the City Mile of London -an independent state-a hotbed of

TREASON-INTRIGUE-GREED-MURDER-CONSPIRACY

 for over 300 years.]

&

How The Crown Rules the World

*

*DID YOU KNOW?

The City of London is governed by the Illuminati-Freemasons and they are governed by their god Lucifer/Satan. The Bank of England owns the Central Banks established around the world, and this is the real power of the modern British Empire.

One example is
the United States Federal
Reserve Bank , which is wholly owned by the Bank of England and her subsidiaries. Thus the world has been enslaved by the Illuminati-Free-Mason conspiracy which exacts her tribute through interest on their various currencies.

"Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown 'slave' colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful."

"The Crown" has nothing to do with the Queen. It is a private corporation led by the Illuminati.
(See: +(1)+(1)+(1)

Government Conspiracies - World of Lies - Award Winning Documentary

AUGUST - 2010 

H.F.741

REMEMBER!

 

[Comments in brackets are ours!]

 

OCTOBER 30-2015

*  *  *

 
 

Workers would be

BETTER OFF

 by £40 a week after Brexit, say Economists.

by Hugo Duncan- Daily Mail

Deputy Finance Editor

April 29,2016

 

 

THE European Union is an 'economic failure' and Britain would be richer if it left, a group of leading economists said yesterday.

They claimed EU membership was holding back growth and branded the euro an 'unmitigated disaster'.

Every worker in the UK would be £40 a week better off a decade after Brexit and the economy would be 4 percent bigger than if the UK stayed in the EU, the economists claimed.

The findings are a direct challenge to George Osborn's claims the the economy would be 6.2 percent smaller by 2030 if Britain votes

TO LEAVE

in the

REFERENDUM

ON JUNE 23 - 2016

Professor Patrick Minford, a former adviser to Margaret Thatcher and one of the authors of yesterday's report branded the Treasury's analysis

'as a totally misleading piece of

PROPAGANDA'

He said it was 'based on almost no proper economic thought and does not stand up to any kind of scrutiny,'

Rather than delivering a Brexit tax'-as claimed by the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) this week - the report argued leaving the EU

would result in a

 BREXIT DIVIDEND

The 'Economists for Brexit' report said output would be higher and wage growth stronger if Britain

LEFT THE EU.

It added that the 'City of London' would continue to THRIVE.

'A  lot of economic nonsense has been talked so far in the Brexit  debate,. 'Most of it has come from the PROJECT FEAR campaign launched by Downing Street.'

Professor Minford, who set up the self-funded eight-man group to challenge the 'consensus' view of the Treasury and international Monetary Fund, said the boost would come from reduced RED TAPE strangling British businesses and a move away from the  the

PROTECTIONIST TRADING UNION'

of the EU towards

FREE TRADE

'Brexit is a shock-a good shock,' he said.

*

Full article

April 29-2016

 

 

 

A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

[POLITICS-THE REALITY]

Decades ago Franklin D. Roosevelt said:

"Nothing in politics ever happens
by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."

Decades earlier Benjamin Disraeli, famed as the Victorian-era Prime Minister
of Britain, wrote:

"The world is governed by people far different from those
imagined by the public."

Taken together, these two statements illustrate the basic premise which
underlies all of the Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER tape reports. This premise is that
major events in politics, economics and international relations are the products
of deliberate moves by largely unseen power factions in the world. All of
these factions seek to increase their influence over us, the general population
of the world. Each one also wishes to increase its own power at the expense of
the other power factions.

 

http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/all/dbeye.html

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS]

MARCH-2014

H.F.141

 

[A ONCE HIDDEN

WORLD OF FINANCIAL SLEAZE FROM WHICH WE HAVE SUFFERED FOR OVER A 100 YEARS]

 

Ben Broadbent, the Bank of England's deputy governor for monetary policy

Article

How the vampire squid

 

[GOLD IN SACKS]

is controlling our lives:

 

They helped cause the crash. Then profited from it. Now, from the Bank of England to the Fed, ex-Goldman Sachs chiefs are pulling the levers of power

By Alex Brummer - March 28th 2014, 1:58:02 am

Ben Broadbent, the Bank of England's new deputy governor for monetary policy, spent a decade during the boom-and-bust years as senior economist at Goldman Sachs.

The plum jobs nearly always go to Goldmanites.

*

Illumination: the Secret Religion - Goldman Sachs

history of the recent financial crisis, which doubles as a history of the
rapid decline and fall of the suddenly ..... Now it is a squalid empire of greed.

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS]

MARCH-2014

 

H.F.144

 

[THIS IS WHAT YOU GET WITH POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND MULTICULTURALISM

due to

 mass immigration from countries with an opposing religion and culture

[HOW TO DESTROY A NATION STATE FROM WITHIN

WITH HELP FROM TONY BLAIR TO INCREASE NEW LABOURS ELECTORAL ROLL

 AND THOSE WHO HAVE ENCOURAGED

MASS IMMIGRATION-

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND MULTICULTURALISM]

JUNE-2014

*
 

 

WE MUSLIMS SHOULD BE APPALLED BY THE SALE OF HALAL MEAT BY STEALTH

By Dr Taj- Director of Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford and Imam of Oxford Islamic Congregation DAILY MAIL, Friday, May 9, 2014

 

 

QUOTE!

...the idea that Muslims cannot eat non-halal food-food that is suitable for Christians - is completely wrong, and it has no theological basis in the Koran, the supreme text of Islam...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

QUOTE!

 

...This is covert religious extremism making its way into Britain by the back door. It is completely wrong that the food sensitivities of Britain's Muslims - who amount to just 4.8 per cent of the population - should take precedence over the other 95 per cent...

 

 

 

 

[THE ABOVE QUOTES SHOW  QUITE CLEARLY THAT IT IS THE GOVERNMENT AND THEIR POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WHICH IS ASSISTING THE EXTREME ELEMENTS OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH TO ACHIEVE THEIR OBJECTIVE. ]

 

 

*

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS]

 

WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAID ABOUT THE EXTREMES OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

MAY-2014

H.F.145

 

JUNE 16-2014

 H.F.148

 
Migrants have cost the Exchequer £140billion since the mid-1990s, more than £22million a day, it was claimed yesterday. A new study starkly contradicts Left-wing claims that immigration helps to cut taxes
Article

How immigrants 'have cost Britain £140bn since 1995': Study contradicts claims immigration helps to cut taxes

By JACK DOYLE All By This Author - 13/03/2014 00:35:30

Think-tank MigrationWatch has responded to another study - given substantial coverage by the BBC last year - which purported to show that immigrants made a contribution of £25billion to the public purse between 2001 and 2011.

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MARCH 13,2014

H F 149

 

WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.

Christopher Story of International Currency Review

www.worldreports.org

 

THE IDEA OF A SINISTER GLOBAL ELITE CONTROLLING EVENTS HAS LONG BEEN THE STUFF OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES-[AND WITH MUCH JUSTIFICATION].

*

DEATH OF PATRIOTISM

by

Leo McKinstry

 

THE NAZI INTERNATIONAL  PLAN IS BROUGHT INTO THE OPEN.

No 3

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

www.worldreports.org

 

DO YOU KNOW?

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

How many people work for the European Union?

The ANSWER is NOT as stated in the EU pamphlet and blazed about by the Government minister Denis MacShane and the Independent which SHOULD KNOW BETTER.]

 

Hurrah for Libertas!

 

eurofacts:-5th September,2008

DAVID OWEN

*

WE DON'T THINK SO

The party crashed before  the vote was cast because of its PRO EU EU stance.

eurofacts

No:89

5th September, 2008

Review by Ian Milne

of 'The Triumph of the Political Class'

by

Peter Oborne.

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

www.worldreports.org
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE

ESTABLISHED

IN MADRID IN 1943

By

HEINRICH HIMMLER

 

 

PETITIONS TO NO10

DEMANDING A REFERENDUM ON EU

It is time the EUROSCEPTIC factions created a WAR COMMITTEE united under one LEADER.

As we have stated on many occasions in the past the Eurosceptic organisations are without a War Committee led by a General such as Sir Michael Rose -ex SAS command who would be the pivot point of the entire Eurosceptic opinion in the country.

 

POLITICAL COURAGE IS NOT AMONG THE QUEEN'S MANY VIRTUES.

PART of EXTRACT

from

WHO KILLED BRITAIN

by

A. N. Wilson

 

SLY OLD FOX-ARCHITECT OF EU CONSTITUTION - SUGGESTS SPECIAL TERMS FOR BRITAIN.

'I fear the Frenchman even  though he offer gifts'.

THEY never give up.  THEY they can't afford to because without Britain the cost to the German engine driver and French fireman of the EU Collective Express would topple the EU.

 
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

THE END OF TRUTH - HOW WE CAME TO LOSE OUR CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY

 

THE EXECUTIVE IS TOO STRONG-THE LEGISLATURE TOO WEAK.

*

The views of the majority of the people of our country are ignored

 

Why our English Self-Government is unique in Europe and the World.

As one of many who attended the Collegiate Church of Saint Mary in Warwick for the Funeral Service of The Rt. Hon. J. Enoch Powell (1912-1998) it was a great honour to be present with many to hear of the life of one of our nations great Patriots.

 

THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?

*

Gordon Brown states before a packed Parliament that it has now signed six

EU TREATIES

so

A REFERENDUM is NOT NECESSARY

WELL!-HE IS WRONG! 

SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

THE WAY WE ARE?

Over our long history we have rarely made a mistake of colossal magnitude such as our foreign affairs with the American colonies in the 18th century and the question of Ireland which is still not completely settled after over 400 years.

BUT IN JUNE 2008 THE ENGLISH PEOPLE WERE BETRAYED BY QUEEN-COMMONS and LORDS.

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE AS 'THE NEW EUROPEAN SOVIET

Christopher Story of International Currency Review

wwww.worldreports.org

 

The CORONATION OATH ACT of 1688

declares

OATH TAKEN for the PURPOSE of MAINTAINING our SPIRITUAL and CIVIL RIGHTS.

Can the QUEEN veto the New EU Treaty?

'YES!'

 

AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED

HOW a  supposed FREE PRESS failed to FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOM.

But are they finally gradually moving towards greater disclosure of the iniquities of the EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE?

OUR VERDICT IS THEY HAVE AS YET ONLY PUT THE TIP OF THEIR TOE INTO THE REVOLTING CREATURE.

BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

A  SURE WASTE OF TIME!

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 
 
 

 Daily Mail

EXPOSED:

BLAIR'S

LETHAL LIES

OVER

 IRAQ

 

Blair's lethal lies over Iraq exposed: Devastating book ... EXCLUSIVE by

James Slack and Ian Drury

Monday, February 29,February,2016

 Daily Mail

 

EXTRACT

THE devastating truth about how Tony Blair's

'DECEIT'

over Iraq cost British troops their

LIVES

is laid bare

TODAY.

An explosive new book-based on exclusive interviews with military chiefs, civil servants and Cabinet ministers-reveals Mr Blair decided in 2002 on the need for

'regime change'

to tackle

SADDAM HUSSEIN.

But he froze out, or kept in the dark his

CHIEF of DEFENCE STAFF

CABINET SECRETARY

FOREIGN SECRETARY

DEFENCE SECRETARY

and most of his

CABINET.

Full Article:

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

FEBRUARY, 29,2016

H. F.773

 
 

Criminal convictions for EU migrants leap by 40% in five years 700 guilty a week in UK. 20,000 foreign criminals deported...

DAILY MAIL

by Ian Drury Home Affairs Correspondent.

 

February 16-2016

 

 

'1 in 6 Romanians broke UK laws'

 

 

Up to one in six Romanians in the UK has received a criminal conviction HERE!, figures suggest.

Over the four years since 2012 British police forces have notified their counterparts in Romania that one of their citizens has received a conviction

 26,870 times.

In 2014, there were 170,000 Romanians in the UK according to the Office for National Statistics. If they had all been in the country for the full four-year period this would mean the equivalent of

ONE in SIX being CONVICTED

-although the true figure will be lower than this.

Some of the convictions could have been picked up by seasonal workers who travelled back to their homeland and did not settle in the UK.

Other Romanians who came to Britain could have received more than one conviction.

Both Romania and Bulgaria formally joined the EU on 1st January 2007, with huge street parties in Bucharest and Sofia marking the accession. But transitional controls to limit immigration were imposed amid fears of a flood of migrants from the poor formerly communist states, and were only lifted in 2014.

Nigel Farage had predicted the relaxation of the rules would result in thousands of Romanians and Bulgarians arrivals each week for several years.

The human tidal wave failed to immediately materialise, however.

BUT

by February 2015 the Office fir National Statistics reported the number of Romanians and Bulgarians working in the UK had risen by 15 per cent year -on-year.

And amid worries over the effects of

ROMANIAN MIGRATION

to this country, it emerged that in just less than a year

HALF OF ALL CONVICTIONS

for

PICK-POCKETING

on the

LONDON UNDERGROUND

were handed out to

IMMIGRANTS

from that

COUNTRY.

 

 

 

THE TOP TEN

Citizens of European Union countries that were convicted of

CRIMES in the UK

1   POLAND                         10,300

2   ROMANIA                       6,249

3   IRELAND                        5,164

4   LITHUANIA                    4,557

5   LATVIA                             2,330

6   PORTUGAL                      1,658

7   SLOVAKIA                        1,134

8   CZECH                                  924

9   BULGARIA                          561

10   FRANCE                            554

Total for all 27 EU countries (excl.UK)

37,079

[Don't our police have enough to do without spending scarce time and  resources on tackling the additional crime wave  from the other members of the EU? and with the Human Rights Act in place the great difficulty of sending them BACK HOME ?]

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

FEBRUARY 16-2016

H.F.772

 

MI-6 Hired Nazi who Killed 100-300 British Agents

September 8, 2014


Kopkow.jpg
(left,
SS Sturmbannfuehrer Horst Kopkow,1910-1996. This account mentions 300 agents killed.)

Wonder why NATO is trying to start a war with Russia? Or why the West created ISIS?

All wars are really between the Illuminati on one hand,
and all combatants on the other.
This is why they finance both sides of every war.


The Illuminati arrange wars so that patriots of every nationality--
British, German, Russian, American etc. -- kill each other.

This is again proven by the fact that, after WW2, MI-6 protected and
then hired the mass murderer of its own agents.



The "Secret Masonry" is setting up "our own, to all appearance, off position, which in at least one of its organs will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. [i.e. the Nazis] Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards." (Protocols of Zion 12.11)


The author of the Protocols writes that if any state raises an objection to Rothschild domination, "it is only pro forma, at our discretion, and by our direction, for their anti-Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren." (Protocols of Zion 9)




"The Kopkow case is uniquely chilling because the MI6 men who spared him were colleagues and "handlers" of his victims. Among those whose torture and death he sanctioned were men and women of the SOE and MI6 agents."


London Times -  May 15, 2005


"ONE of Hitler's top intelligence officers, who ordered the murders of more than 100 British secret agents in concentration camps, was spared execution as a war criminal and selected to work for MI6.

Newly opened papers contain startling evidence that in the postwar scramble to secure information about Russian communists, British Intelligence "turned" Horst Kopkow, faked his death and used him to fight the Cold War.

Evidence emerged in the 1980s that Britain had become a refuge for suspected war criminals, but few would have believed that the Government had gone even further and put a man like Kopkow on its books.

Details of how MI6 snatched Kopkow, 35, from war crimes investigators, inventing his fake death from "bronchopneumonia", are revealed in private papers made public only now. The papers belonged to Vera Atkins, a senior officer of the Special Operations Executive (SOE), Britain 's secret wartime body. After the war she mounted a one-woman investigation into the fate of her agents behind enemy lines.

The Atkins documents have been corroborated by newly declassified secret papers in the British and American National Archives. MI6 declined to comment on the Kopkow case.

However, intelligence sources indicated yesterday that the service itself was taken aback by the evidence. To date, Britain has denied that it engaged in the dark arts used by the Americans, whose employment of Nazis to catch Communists has been well-documented. British intelligence sources pointed out that Kopkow was not in the league of "the butcher of Lyons", a reference to Klaus Barbie, the most notorious war criminal employed by the Americans.

The Kopkow case is uniquely chilling because the MI6 men who spared him were colleagues and "handlers" of his victims. Among those whose torture and death he sanctioned were men and women of the SOE and MI6 agents.

While Kopkow's information may have been considered valuable, it was in fact useless. The head of MI6's Russian desk when Kopkow was captured was Kim Philby, exposed as a Soviet spy more than 15 years later.

Precisely how long Kopkow was employed by British Intelligence remains murky. German records state that he adopted the name Cordes and died in Gelsenkirchen in 1996."



king'smen.jpgIlluminati British and Nazis Collaborated
by Henry Makow Ph.D.

In the wake of D-Day June 6, 1944, hundreds of acts of sabotage were committed by the French Resistance --- with one exception.

There were none in the north and north west where they mattered most.

There, the "Prosper" and related "Scientist" networks had been mopped by the Gestapo in 1943. Prosper's courageous young leader, Francis Anthony Suttill, 34, was languishing in a concentration camp.

He and scores of British agents were later executed, along with over 10,000 members of the French Resistance. One hundred and sixty plane loads of armaments --2600 containers -- including tons of sten guns and explosives, were seized by the Nazis. (193)

Who was responsible for this debacle?

According to BBC Producer Robert Marshall's thoroughly documented book, "All The King's Men" (Collins, 1988) the culprit was none other than the homosexual and Freemason, Deputy Head of MI-6, Sir Claude Edward Marjoribanks Dansey (1876-1947.)

Dansey deliberately placed a double agent, Henri Dericourt, at the heart of the Prosper organization. Dericourt, a French pilot, was responsible for organizing the nighttime shuttling of agents and materiel in and out of France.

He kept his handler, SS Sturmbannfuhrer Karl Baumelburg, head of counter sabotage in France, apprised of all the comings and goings, including the mail that passed back and forth. In return, the Gestapo allowed the operation to unfold which made Dericourt look very good indeed.

MI-6 placed their own man Nicolas Bodington in SOE  to vouch for Dericourt and block all efforts by SOE to uncover the traitor. Bodington actually met with Baumelburg on a visit to Paris in 1943. They all had known each other before the war. It was Bodington who introduced Baumelburg to Delicourt.

After the war, Dericourt confirmed that he worked for Dansey. (151)

Why would MI-6 engage in this kind of treason?

Continues
 


Related-
 
Makow- Hitler a Traitor? Testimony of his Closest Aides
 Makow- 
Hitler and Bormann Were Traitors


Thanks to Hamad Subani's
The World War Deception for alerting me to Horst Kopkow.

 

 

 

SEPTEMBER 8-2014

H .F .304

 
 

Nigel Farage, the leader of Britain's anti-EU party UKIP, enjoys a pint of beer as he celebrates after a hustings event at The Oddfellows Hall in Ramsgate, south east England August 26, 2014. Farage who is seeking a seat in parliament, was chosen by his party to run in a southern constituency controlled by the ruling Conservatives.  REUTERS/Dylan Martinez  (BRITAIN - Tags: POLITICS)

Article

Nigel Farage vows to RESIGN as UKIP leader if the party fails to breakthrough in next year's general election 

By Tom Mctague, Mailonline Deputy Political Editor - August 27th 2014, 5:30:22 pm

The UKIP leader said there was ‘not one ounce of complacency from me’ after he was selected last night to stand in the South Thanet seat for UKIP at next year's general election.

[AND SO HE SHOULD!

because it has been the lack-lustre attitude  over DECADES of so -called LEADERS of UKIP not realising or more possibly under orders from their employer the CONSERVATIVE PARTY to forestall any real progress for as long as the SECRET is KEPT which has now been fully REVEALED.

It is  a WAR we are FIGHTING for the RETURN of our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.  There can be no greater BATTLE but that which concerns the FREEDOM OF A COUNTRY which is ENGLAND.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 29-2014

H F 305

 

 

EUREKA!

As a great War Leader Winston Churchill has said: -

  "THIS IS NOT THE END [of our Victory]. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is perhaps the end of the beginning"

AT LAST!

A COURAGEOUS EUROSCEPTIC MP

 HAS CROSSED THE RUBICON AS THE FIRST CONSERVATIVE TO LEAVE THE COMFORT ZONE OF HIS PARTY AND SHOW HIS TRUE PATRIOTISM BY LEAVING THE THE SO-CALLED CON PARTY AND PUT HIS CAREER AT RISK FOR HIS COUNTRY'S SAKE AND THE RETURN OF OUR HISTORIC INDEPENDENT

NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

WE HAVE  CALLED FOR THIS TO HAPPEN FOR OVER A DECADE BUT WE HEARD THE CONSTANT REFRAIN THAT BY DOING SO IT WOULD MEAN THAT LABOUR WOULD RETURN TO GOVERNMENT BUT IF THOSE MUCH REPEATED SIREN VOICES HAD BEEN IGNORED TH0SE MANY YEARS AGO THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN UKIP MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT. BUT AS WE NOW KNOW IT WAS THE CON PARTY WHO BROUGHT UKIP INTO BEING AS A HONEY TRAP FOR CONSERVATIVE EUROSCEPTICS WHICH WAS RUN BY CONSERVATIVE INSIDERS UNTIL THE WHISTLE WAS BLOWN IN RECENT TIMES. THIS IS A BEGINNING OF THE ROAD TO RECOVER OUR COUNTRY AND FREEDOM TO RUN OUR OWN AFFAIRS AND PROTECT OUR BORDERS AND AS OUR  GREAT PRIME MINISTER IN THE 18th CENTURY WILLIAM PITT (1759-1806) EXCLAIMED

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will' as I trust, save Europe by her example' [Nov. 1805

 

THIS IS THE TRUE BEGINNING OF OUR BATTLE TO WAGE WAR ON THE GANG OF THREE IN WESTMINSTER WHO HAVE ENSLAVED THE ENGLISH PEOPLE ONCE ONE OF THE FREEST PEOPLES IN THE WORLD  IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE. AND THE DOOR CAN BE OPENED TO THAT FREEDOM IF ALL WHO LOVE FREEDOM WHATEVER THEIR PAST POLITICAL LEANING OR NONE TO GRASP THIS TIMELY OPPORTUNITY TO CHANGE OUR SOILED POLITICAL SYSTEM FOR A BETTER FUTURE WITH A DEMOCRACY SUITABLE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY WHERE THE PEOPLE WILL REIGN AND NOT THE BANKSTERS AND THEIR MINIONS.

 

 

THE CHOICE IS YOURS!

MR CARSWELL HAS SHOWN THE WAY'

WE MUST GO FORWARD TO VICTORY!

 DEFEAT WE MUST NEVER ACCEPT.

DO IT!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 19-2014

H F 306

 
Daily Mail CHRISTMAS-2008 CAMPAIGN

ACTION ON ALZHEIMER'S

Make your cheque payable to 'Daily Mail' and send it , with this form, to Alzheimer's Appeal, PO BOX 5000, Dept. ALZ, ALTON HANTS, ENGLAND . GU34 9BX

YOU CAN GIVE ONLINE AT

www.dailymail.

co.uk/promotion

 

A

MERRY

 CHRISTMAS

in 2008

 AND A

 HAPPY NEW YEAR

 TO YOU ALL

 

TO LATE!

THEY

ARE

Closing the parliament door when the constitution has bolted? They do protest

TOO MUCH!

 

CONVENTIONS OF THE  HOUSE OF COMMONS

We will use the word of a great patriot historian Edward A. Freeman, D. C. L., LL.   D- Honorary Fellow of Trinity College, Oxford. (1876) From his: -

THE GROWTH

OF

THE

 

ENGLISH

CONSTITUTION

 

 

SO YOU ALL THOUGHT THAT COMMUNISM WAS DEAD WITH THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL-THINK AGAIN!

 

Snippets of COMMENT [Daily Mail COMMENT- Friday, December5, 2008]  WHAT A SHOWER!  THE ORIGINS OF THE EU   The origins of what is now the EUROPEAN UNION

A SINISTER EROSION OF OUR ANCIENT LIBERTIES

 

DID YOU KNOW?   

NO 6 -  

CAP

 trebles

COST of FOOD.

ABOLITION

WILL SAVE

£40

and £60 a week,

HUGE SAVING

for every

FAMILY IN THE  LAND

ECHR outlaws DNA DATABASE of INNOCENT PEOPLE

I HATE these UNELECTED FOREIGN JUDGES.

 BUT today I could kiss them for BACKING the FREEDOMS we FOUGHT TWO-WORLD WARS to PROTECT.  

by

TOM UTLEY

 

 

 

 

DID YOU KNOW?

 NO 5-  

BEHIND SCHEDULE  Buckets of taxpayers money are currently being poured into the EU'S Galileo Global Positioning System Programme.

This is behind schedule, massively over-budget and entirely unnecessary since we can use the American GPS System FREE OF CHARGE.

 

 

 

DID YOU KNOW?

 NO 4-

 National Interest  Always anxious to play its part eurofacts is keen to point out to the obvious truth that a genuinely EUROSCEPTIC GOVERNMENT

will find it easier to find CUTS than a

EUROPHILE ONE

for the simple reason that many EU programmes are HUGELY EXPENSIVE -UNNECESSARY

 

 

WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

THE SIGNS OF A DICTATORSHIP IN A ONCE FREE DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY

*

A monstrous abuse of power by the same bunch of gangsters who hounded Dr David Kelly to his DEATH

by

LITTLEJOHN

 

SO YOU

ALL

THOUGHT THAT COMMUNISM WAS DEAD WITH THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL-

THINK AGAIN!

 

THE

RIGHT

HONOURABLE

GENTLEMEN

- MANY ARE NEVER RIGHT OR HONOURABLE AND CERTAINLY NO GENTLEMEN.

 
LABOUR-CONSERVATIVE -LIBDEMS MPS

UNITE TO DEFEND

PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE WHICH THEIR OWN TRAITOROUS ACTIONS OVER 40 YEARS HAVE CULMINATED

IN A

TOTALITARIAN

STATE

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN
UK SELLS MORE GOODS OUTSIDE EU

CHRISTMAS  GREETINGS FROM THE PAST

2003-2007
THE SPEECH THE QUEEN SHOULD HAVE MADE

WE NEED A REVOLUTION

NOW!

 

FED UP!  No one to listen to your COMPLAINT

Daily Mail -Money Mail-editor Tony Hazell-Web:

 

www.thisismoney.co.uk

 

DID YOU KNOW? 

THE EURO 

No 1- WHY WE ARE BETTER OFF OUT

 

TO LATE!Closing the parliament door when the constitution has bolted? They do protest

TOO MUCH!

 

THE SIGNS

 OF A

 DICTATORSHIP

IN

A ONCE FREE DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY

 
FRONT PAGE INFORMATION WITHDRAWN ON THE 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008

STILL AVAILABLE IN THE ABOVE

PICK & CHOOSE

 FORMAT 

TREASURY TEAM CAN'T ADD UP ON VAT REDUCTION.

*

Some retailers will not pass on Vat cut

 

AT LONG LAST!

A LABOUR PARTY  now back to it's roots - but A NATIONAL GOVERNMENT would have brought JUSTICE to bear on the PUBLIC PENSIONS SCANDAL.

 

THE ORIGINS

 OF THE EU

The origins of what is now the

EUROPEAN

UNION

COLLECTIVE
SOVIET ANALYST

A Review of continuing

Soviet global revolutionary strategy

 
The Lisbon Treaty is DEAD

IRISH voters rejected the LISBON TREATY on 12th June 2008.   In a debate in the House of Lords on 18th June, Lord Neill of Bladen, a former Warden and Vice-Chancellor of Oxford University, a highly respected lawyer, explained why

 

BBC Account of History obscured by the partial   Truth –

Part 1

 
NATIONAL DESTABILISATION PLAN OF KGB/GRU BASED ON SOVIET DEFECTOR INTELLIGENCE

*

[THE ENEMY WITHIN]

[ Note: 2 bulletins here]

The Minister of 'Justice' Mr Straw the 'Nonsense ' man, says Iraq war was legal

 

 A Silent Vigil in a village country church graveyard on Remembrance Day.

DID YOU KNOW?

THE EURO 

 No 2- WHY WE ARE BETTER OUT

 

GOVERNMENT should be the SERVANT of the PEOPLE and INDIVIDUALITY or it is a  DEMONICAL DICTATORSHIP.

 

DO YOU KNOW?

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

*

www.edwardharle.com

 
Don’t blame the

BNP.

It’s the main parties who have betrayed the voters

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

Blair

the

law

breaker

 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country.

 

CIVIL WAR

PARLIAMENT

AGAINST

 

THE KING

 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

RABID BEHAVIOUR OF MANY LABOUR MPS IN SUPPRESSING FREE SPEECH IN PARLIAMENT HAS NOW BEEN ACCOMPANIED WITH AN INVASION OF THE RIGHTS OF MEMBERS.

 

UK

SELLS

MORE GOODS

OUTSIDE

 EU

WE

NEED

A REVOLUTION

NOW!

 

LABOUR-CONSERVATIVE -LIBDEMS MPS UNITE TO DEFEND PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE WHICH THEIR OWN TRAITOROUS ACTIONS OVER 40 YEARS HAVE CULMINATED IN A TOTALITARIAN STATE

 

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

 

307

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY WHEN IT CAME TO THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TIO HIS PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS SUPPOSED POLITICAL PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT TRACE

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 
     

CLICK EACH ITEM TO VIEW

< IT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE!  - LABOUR AND TORY MPS UNITE TO DEVISE PLOT FOR BRITAIN TO LEAVE EU‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’            OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO AND TORY MPS UNITE TO DEVISE PLOT FOR BRITAIN TO DESTROY IT?         OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP              OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?              LIBERTIES OF PARLIAMENT-BIRTHRIGHT OF SUBJECTS OF ENGLAND.               COULD ENGLAND SURVIVE OUTSIDE THE EU-YES!               ON THE EURO - MAX + HASTINGS - SORRY I WAS WRONG!             TORY MPS DEMAND REFERENDUM ON EUROPE

CLICK EACH ITEM TO VIEW

     
 
 
 
 
 

 

DAILY MAIL

 

Criminal convictions for EU migrants leap by 40% in five years 700 guilty a week in UK. 20,000 foreign criminals deported...

DAILY MAIL

by Ian Drury Home Affairs Correspondent.

 

February 16-2016

 

 

'1 in 6 Romanians broke UK laws'

 

 

Up to one in six Romanians in the UK has received a criminal conviction HERE!, figures suggest.

Over the four years since 2012 British police forces have notified their counterparts in Romania that one of their citizens has received a conviction

 26,870 times.

In 2014, there were 170,000 Romanians in the UK according to the Office for National Statistics. If they had all been in the country for the full four-year period this would mean the equivalent of

ONE in SIX being CONVICTED

-although the true figure will be lower than this.

Some of the convictions could have been picked up by seasonal workers who travelled back to their homeland and did not settle in the UK.

Other Romanians who came to Britain could have received more than one conviction.

Both Romania and Bulgaria formally joined the EU on 1st January 2007, with huge street parties in Bucharest and Sofia marking the accession. But transitional controls to limit immigration were imposed amid fears of a flood of migrants from the poor formerly communist states, and were only lifted in 2014.

Nigel Farage had predicted the relaxation of the rules would result in thousands of Romanians and Bulgarians arrivals each week for several years.

The human tidal wave failed to immediately materialise, however.

BUT

by February 2015 the Office fir National Statistics reported the number of Romanians and Bulgarians working in the UK had risen by 15 per cent year -on-year.

And amid worries over the effects of

ROMANIAN MIGRATION

to this country, it emerged that in just less than a year

HALF OF ALL CONVICTIONS

for

PICK-POCKETING

on the

LONDON UNDERGROUND

were handed out to

IMMIGRANTS

from that

COUNTRY.

 

 

 

THE TOP TEN

Citizens of European Union countries that were convicted of

CRIMES in the UK

1   POLAND                         10,300

2   ROMANIA                       6,249

3   IRELAND                        5,164

4   LITHUANIA                    4,557

5   LATVIA                             2,330

6   PORTUGAL                      1,658

7   SLOVAKIA                        1,134

8   CZECH                                  924

9   BULGARIA                          561

10   FRANCE                            554

Total for all 27 EU countries (excl.UK)

37,079

[Don't our police have enough to do without spending scarce time and  resources on tackling the additional crime wave  from the other members of the EU? and with the Human Rights Act in place the great difficulty of sending them BACK HOME ?]

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

FEBRUARY 16-2016

H.F.772

 

DAILY MAIL

Veils-segregated-schools-risk-sowing-seeds-Islamic-terror-Britain.

 

 by MANZOOR-MOGHAL

CHAIRMAN OF THE MUSLIM FORUM

 

EXTRACT from last paragraph

CHOICE

Crucially to me, the veil is a highly politicised refutation of Western values.  Its supporters talk about 'choice', but

THERE IS NO CHOICE

,  for school children or teenage girls from patriarchal families whose

PARENTS FORCE THEN TO WEAR IT.

Just as there is no choice for girls who want to mix with boys, or play stringed instruments in Al-Madinah school in Derby, if we are to believe the weekend reports.

MY GREAT WORRY is that, if the [POLITICALLY CORRECT ]British authorities continue to allow the ISLAMIC HARDLINERS to have THEIR WAY in the name of CHOICE when it comes to SEGREGATING BOYS and GIRLS in SCHOOLS, or SHARIA COURTS, or insisting that women should be allowed to wear VEILS IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES, then those HARDLINERS will

FEEL THEY ARE PUSHING AT AN OPEN DOOR.

We must sadly, accept that there are people in our midst who want to see a hardline Islamist Caliphate in Britain.  And while SECURITY and INTELLIGENCE SERVICES are nothing but heroic in their fight against ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS, continuing to foil TERROR PLOTS on a REGULAR BASIS, our civic institutions have in CONTRAST have been FAR TOO COWARDLY in their RELUCTANCE to CHALLENGE FUNDERMENTALISM.

The shocking slaughter in Nairobi is the TRUE FACE OF ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM. AND we in BRITAIN should NEVER APPEASE SUCH A MENTALITY.

 

*

[THE ABOVE STATEMENT WAS A TIMELY WARNING TO THE POLITICALLY-CORRECT POLITICIANS WHO HAVE NOT THE FAINTEST IDEA OF THE DAMAGE THEY ARE DOING TO THE FURTHERING OF INTEGRATION INTO OUR SOCIETY.  AS WE SEE IN SO MANY MATTERS THEY APPEAR TO LIVE IN ANOTHER WORLD BECAUSE UNLESS THEY ACT IMMEDIATELY AND DECISIVELY TO TAKE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION THEN THE BACKLASH AGAINST THE ISLAMIC RELIGION IN ENGLAND WILL BECOME OUT OF CONTROL AND BLOOD SHED WILL APPEAR ON OUR STREETS .

 AS AN ENGLISHMAN AND CONSCIOUS OF OUR CHRISTIAN HERITAGE WHICH IS DISAPPEARING BEFORE OUR VERY EYES AND GRADUALLY BEING REPLACED BY ITS  EASTERN SKYLINE IN TOWN AND CITY BY THE ISLAMIC FAITH WHICH WHATEVER THE ABOVE COURAGEOUS WRITER HAS SAID , FOR SOME TIME TO COME, OR MAY BE FOR EVER, THE THREAT HE HAS BRAVELY ILLUMINATED WOULD APPEAR TO BE AN UNBROKEN FEATURE OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH. WE KNOW WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO CHRISTIAN COMMUNITIES THROUGHOUT THE MUSLIM WORLD AND HOW SOME CHRISTIANS ARE FORCED TO CHANGE THEIR FAITH OR SUFFER DEATH.

THE ONLY ANSWER IS FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO DO WHATEVER IT NEEDS TO DO TO DIVIDE THE TRUE ISLAMIC FAITH FROM THE AGGRESSIVE ELEMENTS DEMANDING AN ISLAMIC STATE AND WHAT THAT WOULD MEAN FOR EVERY MAN-WOMEN AND CHILD IN OUR COUNTRY.]

THE+HISTORY+OF+THE+ISLAMIC+FAITH

IN+ENGLAND

CAN+IT+CONTROL

ITS+MORE+AGGRESIVE+ELEMENTS

THAT+DEMAND+AN+ISLAMIC+STATE?

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OUR!]

 

SEPTEMBER 24-2013

Trevor Phillips says Britain risks wave of unrest unless ..Were heading for immigration disaster, warns former race tsar'.

- by

 Ian Drury-Home Affairs Correspondent.

Daily Mail

 

 

EXTRACT

BRITAIN risks' sleep walking into catastrophe' and a wave of racial unrest unless it addresses concerns over

IMMIGRATION

the former head of the equalities watchdog has warned.

In a devastating analysis, Trevor Phillips insisted the

 FAILURE to ALLY FEARS

 about the rapidly changing face of the UK is fuelling

GROWING COMMUNITY TENSIONS.

He called anti-immigrant sentiment a 'smouldering' tinderbox that could ignite at any time, stoked by people who had felt unable to speak out for

FEAR

of being branded

RASCISTS.

The former chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission accused senior figures of a

'DEAFENING SILENCE.'

when confronted with issues linked to

RACE-ETHNICITY AND CULTURE...

 

Full article

 

 

[THE POISONOUS SEED OF MULTICULTURALISM WAS SET OVER 13 YEARS AGO AND DURING THAT TIME THE EDP HAS HAD A CAPTION  BY HISTORIAN ERNEST BARKER  WHICH WARNED  THAT THE ROOT OF THE RACE OF A NATION STATE MUST BE WELL INTEGRATED AND THAT ANY FURTHER INFLUXES OF PEOPLES SHOULD CONFORM TO THE SETTLED POPULATION. THE FAILURE TO TAKE THIS WARNING IN HAND HAS BROUGHT US TO OUR PRESENT DANGERS. MR PHILLIPS HAS ADMITTED HIMSELF AS BEING A PREVIOUS MISTAKEN CONVERT TO MULTICULTURALISM-BUT THE DAMAGE HAS BEEN CATASTROPHIC TO THE EXTREME AND IT CAN ONLY GET WORSE. ONLY THOSE WHO ACCEPT THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO INTEGRATE SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO REMAIN. OTHERS MUST BE INDUCED TO LEAVE.]

 IMMIGRATION FILE

 

MAY 10-2016

 

 

[C[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS OUR OURS.]

 

 

H.F.730

 
     

CLICK EACH ITEM TO VIEW

< IT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE!  - LABOUR AND TORY MPS UNITE TO DEVISE PLOT FOR BRITAIN TO LEAVE EU‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’            OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO AND TORY MPS UNITE TO DEVISE PLOT FOR BRITAIN TO DESTROY IT?         OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP              OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?              LIBERTIES OF PARLIAMENT-BIRTHRIGHT OF SUBJECTS OF ENGLAND.               COULD ENGLAND SURVIVE OUTSIDE THE EU-YES!               ON THE EURO - MAX + HASTINGS - SORRY I WAS WRONG!             TORY MPS DEMAND REFERENDUM ON EUROPE -   IN MAY 2016- MAX HASTINGS-THIS IS WHY I'M NOT VOTING FOR BREXIT .

CLICK EACH ITEM TO VIEW

     

 

 

 DAILY MAIL

Don't Bomb Syria-but don't forget the enemy within

by

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN

 

December 4 - 2015

 EXTRACT

...Cameron talks about the necessity of meeting our military commitments to our closest allies. Yet HE has presided over a suicidally short-sighted rundown of our Armed Forces, which began under George Brown.  Our presence in the Syrian campaign is more symbolic than critical. Symbolic is about all we can manage these days.

Anyway, it's all very well lobbing a few laser-guided Fire and Brimstone missiles at Raqqa, but what about the enemy within? While the RAF isn bombing Syria, we are told at least 450 home grown jihadis are now back in this country after training with Izal in the Middle East.

[We are most certainly poorly so-called governed by IDIOTS! WE need a patriotic Cromwellian DICTATOR for a year to clean up the stinking revolting MESS! before PARLIAMENT is allowed to resume what is called DEMOCRACY.]

many of them planning attacks here.

 IF WE KNOW WHO THEY ARE WHY HAVEN'T THEY BEEN DETAINED ALREADY?

Meanwhile, the authorities sit on their hands while increasing numbers of impressionable BRITISH MUSLIMS are 'radicalised' online and Islamist sympathisers

TAKE OVER OUR UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES, USING VIOLENT PROTEST AND SOCIAL MEDIA SAVAGERY.

Hard-line mosques and religious schools are allowed to flourish unmolested. We complain about Turkey being the gateway to Syria, but our borders are so porous that terrorists-both BRITISH and FOREIGN-are able to come and go as they please.

[This is one of the historic and  most dangerous shortcomings of a British society which in its endeavour to allow the liberties of a FREE SOCIETY it FAILS to take effective action against those who use our FREEDOM to further their own despotic ambitions at home and abroad. The classic example is the invasion of the Islamic Fundamentalists under the cover of a massive influx of over 3,000,000  Muslims of which a greater number have only the wish to in time establish an ISLAMIC STATE in ENGLAND-they already have 85 SHARIA COURTS in place. When one reflects on the matter one realises that it was the ignorance of the ruling elite here ignoring the once prudent native demographic principle which allowed the massive inflow of those of another RELIGION and CULTURE and in many instances as mentioned above the formation of an ENEMY WITHIN-one can hardly blame the staunchly religious Muslims from wanting to implant their

FAITH and CULTURE on THEIR  adopted NEW LAND.

THE FAULT WAS OURS!]

[Sorry We Got Carried Away]

To continue:  Now we learn that the computer system which is supposed to check on a watch list of known terrorists trying to sneak into Britain typically crashes three days a week.

Not only that, it also turns out that the Tory pledge [as so very often] to scrap the pernicious [so-called] Human Rights Act, aka the

TERRORISTS CHARTER

has been [typically]

DELAYED FOR AT LEAST ANOTHER YEAR.

If the Government hasn't got the stomach  to take on the yuman rites lobby, then at least it should bring back the laws of

SEDITION and TREASON

But it 's far easier to bomb a few oil depots and Izal'command and control' centres in the desert than it is to

CONFRONT the REAL MENACE  in our MIDST.

We're told the Syria debate was a shining example of British democracy in action. But from outside the Bubble looking in, it was little more than a demonstration of displacement activity. What if, on Wednesday night there had been a Paris-style attack in this country, rather than in America?

Where would 14 people gunned down in at a Christmas party in Sandbach, Cheshire-instead of San Bernardino, California-have left all those back-slapping, sabre-rattling politicians at Westminster , congratulating themselves on

GETTING TOUGH ON TERROR?

They'd have soon learned the

REAL MEANING

of a

PYRRHIC VICTORY.

 

continued:-

 

DECEMBER 4,2015

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

Eurosceptic MPs warn David Cameron

HE faces revolt over EU

 

by Jason Groves-Deputy Political Editor.

Let-ministers-campaign- to - leave-EU-or-they'll-quit-Eurosceptic -MPs-warn-Cameron-faces-revolt-referendum.

...Wycombe MP Mr Baker told Sky News  that Mr Cameron would spark a Cabinet walkout if he tried to persuade Eurosceptic ministers to back his campaign to keep Britain [ENGLAND locked] in the EU. He said: It is inevitable that some members of the Cabinet [In a so-called DEMOCRACY] feel they have to resign if they are browbeaten into supporting a deal which is so [laughably a sick joke as to be even called ] flimsy

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER 21-2015

H.F.776

 
     
 

  IN SEPTEMBER-2011 - IT HAS HAPPENED MANY TIMES BEFORE!  - LABOUR AND TORY MPS UNITE TO DEVISE PLOT FOR BRITAIN TO LEAVE EU              ‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’             OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP              OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?              LIBERTIES OF PARLIAMENT-BIRTHRIGHT OF SUBJECTS OF ENGLAND.               COULD ENGLAND SURVIVE OUTSIDE THE EU-YES!               ON THE EURO-MAX+HASTINGS-SORRY I WAS WRONG!

 
     
 
 

Mass migration and the threat to Britain's social fabric liberals can no longer ignore

 

 

Daily Mail-by Trevor Phillips-

 

EX CHAIRMAN  OF THE EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

 

 

EXTRACT

THERE are few countries in the world where the people have been as open and welcoming to immigrants-like my family-as modern Britain.

Over recent decades, our society has absorbed huge numbers of newcomers with remarkably little strife.

That willingness to embrace the changing face of the nation was demonstrated only last week by the election of my friend Sadiq Khan as the Mayor of London, a victory that saw him become the first Muslim to lead a European capital.

But before we smother ourselves  in self-congratulation we need to recognise that this fine liberal tradition is now under profound strain.

We are in the midst of an astonishing demographic revolution, one that threatens to overwhelm our civic infrastructure, undermine our

DEMOCRATIC VALUES and WEAKEN OUR SOCIAL  COHESION...today's immigration in Britain is completely different in scale and character to anything that happened before 2000.

In the past year alone, 617,000 migrants arrived here, though this may be a severe underestimate since the official figures also show that 828,000 National Insurance numbers were given out to foreign nationals...

 

It is estimated that by 2050' around a third of the UK population will be made up of people of colour, while, according to the last census, those classified a White British are now in a minority in places such as London, Luton, Slough and Leicester...

 

Extremism

Frankly, our efforts to promote integration have been utterly feeble, and I believe the current laissez-faire approach is a recipe for

DISASTER

Dismissal of public concerns about

IMMIGRATION

 will only fuel resentment, division and extremism. We don't need to guess the future. We can see it in continental Europe, exemplified by the dramatic rise of the National Front in France.

If we are to avoid that experience in Britain, our leaders need to stop parroting cliches, and start to introduce realistic policies.

That means for example, an orderly approach to immigration through a points system based on valuing incomers' skills and likely contribution.

It also means a far greater official emphasis on

INTEGRATION

especially through the promotion of modern liberal values and the

LEARNING and SPEAKING  of ENGLISH.

Authorities have a statutory duty to fight discrimination. They should also be given one to fight the growing social dislocation we are witnessing.

Without such measures, I fear that Britain will become ever more fragmented.

The great danger is the the centre-Left political tradition to which I belong may, through sheer cowardice, allow the fatal undermining of the very values of

EQUALITY and SOLIDARITY for which we have always stood-and once they are gone, we may

NEVER BE ABLE TO RECOVER THEM.

 

Full article

*  *  *

[What has happened to the demographic map of England is tantamount to TREASON because the once FREE and  majority WHITE SETTLED population has been particularly since 2000 and the arrival of TONY BLAIR , as clearly explained above driven from their homes and now live in a country which many no longer recognise. What is most astonishing is that those MOST AFFECTED the English WORKING MAN has NOT appeared to take their once PROTECTOR the LABOUR PARTY to TASK for their denigration of DUTY to the WORKING CLASS. But then it was no doubt the POLITICAL CORRECTNESS that weakened their resolve to PROTECT THEIR IDENTITY and COUNTRY which  as a matter of FACT also applies to the coming REFERENDUM on the JUNE 23-2016.]

 

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

May 11-2016

H. F .777

 

Big US banks fund Dave Cameron's EU referendum fight to the tune of £2m

 

News for DAILY MAIL-BANKROLLED BY

FAT CATS

 

 

BANKROLLED BY FAT CATS

[YOU ONLY NEED TO SEE WHO  ARE THE TRUE BENEFICIARIES OF THE EU . AT THE OUTSET IT WAS THE BIG LANDOWNERS-USUALLY POLITICIANS AND MONARCHS, TO BE JOINED BY THOSE WITH A ONE WORLD ORDER-MANY BANKERS AND OTHERS AND TO KNOW MANY OF THEIR SULLIED FINANCIAL HISTORY GOING BACK OVER A 100 YEARS TO UNDERSTAND THEIR  CONNECTION TO THE MANY CORRUPT COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE ACTIVITIES OF THAT

BEAST!

BY THE DONORS OF THE

REMAIN LOBBY

IN THE COMING

 EU REFERENDUM

From billionaires to foreign financiers, who's funding whom

The major donors from each side of the EU referendum

BRITAIN STRONGER IN EU

David Sainsbury £3,756,803

David Harding £3,500,000

Goldman Sacks £500,000

J. P Morgan £500,000

Morgan Stanley £250,000

Citigroup £250,000

Lloyds TSB £20,000(loan)

Anna Rausing £750,000

Roland Rudd £32,509

Lord Myners £25,000

Alex Wilmot-Sitwell £15,000

Sir David Bell £10,000

Eurostar £7,508

*  *  *

VOTE LEAVE

Patrick Barbour £500,000

Peter Cruddas £350,000

Terence Adams £300,000

Tim Martin £50,000

Stuart Wheeler £15,000

Jeremy Hoskins £15,500

Sir Rocco Forte £12,000

Ivor Brake £10,000

*

LEAVE EU

 

Arron Banks £6,000,000

*

Full article-

 

*  *  *

The Banking Swindle

 

 

*

Secrets of the Federal Reserve - American Patriot Friends Network

*

THE HISTORY OF MONEY Abraham Lincoln's Greenback Dollar - Xat

www.xat.org/xat/usury.html

*

The Federal Reserve: History of Lies, Thievery, and Deceit

www.scionofzion.com/federalreserve.htm

and A GREAT DEAL more!

8

MAY 12-2016S

 

H.F.778

 
     
    IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!  -LATEST! - WHAT IS A EUROSCEPTIC? DAVID CAMERON AS A BILDERBERGER-YOU KNOW THIOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE SERVANTS OF THE WORLD GOVERNMENT CROWD WHO ARE DESTROYING NATION STATES AND HAVE AN AGENDA TO REDUCE THE WORLD POPULATION DOWN TO 500,000,000 -SO ANYTHING THAT DAVID CAMERON SAYS REGARDING EUROSCEPTICISM NEEDS TO BE TAKEN WITH A PINCH OF SALT OR PEPPER IF YOU WISH TO CLEAR YOUR TEARS AWAY.   IT IS A SUNNY SATURDAY MORNING AND HAVE OPENED THE DAILY MAIL TO SEE STEPHEN GLOVER'S ARTICLE 'Has Cameron now broken a second pledge on Europe' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1325008/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Has-David-Cameron-broken-SECOND-pledge-Europe.html

+ WE NOW HEAR ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 11,2010 IN CHRISTOPHER BOOKER'S ARTICLE IN THE DAILY MAIL SHOWN BELOW 'The ultimate surrender of Britain's sovereignty' - THE PROBLEM AS WE SEE IT IS THAT THOSE WHO HAVE FOR YEARS FOUGHT THE EUROSCEPTIC CAUSE REFUSE TO GET TO THE BASICS REGARDING THE TRUE STATE OF GOVERNANCE IN ENGLAND - WE LET THOSE FROM OUR SISTER NATIONS TO FIGHT THEIR OWN CAUSE. - THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS WELL KNOWN SUCH AS WHO REALLY RUNS OUR COUNTRY AND FOR THAT MATTER THE OLD COMMONWEALTH NATIONS - IT IS THE CITY OF LONDON HEADED BY OUR ONCE TRUE SOVEREIGN LORD -QUEEN ELIZABETH II - ASSISTED BY GEORGE OSBORNE-CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER -A BILDERBERGER A SERVANT OF THE ILLUMINATI - ROTHCHILD'S BANK OF ENGLAND.- WHY? OH! WHY -WON'T THOSE MANY DEFENDER'S OF ENGLISH FREEDOM STATE OUTRIGHT THAT THE BILDERBERGERS ARE TRAITORS AND SHOULD STAND TRIAL FOR TREASON?- YES! -YES! - WE KNOW THAT IN 1998 TONY BLAIR SECRETLY INSERTED A CLAUSE IN A BILL TO PROTECT HIMSELF AND EVERYONE ELSE INCLUDING THE ONCE QUEEN OF ENGLAND FROM A TREASON TRIAL. - WHAT WE ARE OBSERVING IS A LOT OF HOT AIR - A FIRM RESOLUTE DETERMINATION TO DO ANYTHING BUT STATE THE REAL OBVIOUS SITUATION WHICH FACES US - THE BILDERBERGERS ARE IN ALL THE POLITICAL PARTIES AT WESTMINSTER - THEY ARE SERVANTS OF ROTHCHILD'S BANK OF ENGLAND AND THE CITY OF LONDON - IT HAS BEEN THE SAME SINCE THE BANK WAS PRIVATISED AT THE END OF THE 17TH CENTURY - SEE 'CENTRAL BANKS!' - INTERNATIONAL BANKERS! IN OUR MULTI VIEW INDEX FILE BELOW. - STRONG TALK AND GRIPPING NEWS STORIES ARE USEFUL - BUT! IT WILL NOT REPLACE REALITY - TO FACE THE TRUE FACTS WHICH FACE EVERY FREEDOM LOVING PERSON IN ENGLAND AND IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. - NOTHING WILL CHANGE UNTIL WE ALL SING FROM THE SAME HYMN-SHEET. ACKNOWLEDGE THE REAL ENEMY WITHIN AND AT LEAST YOU WILL HAVE THE SATISFACTION OF KNOWING THE TRUE FACTS EVEN IF THEY SHOW A FORMIDABLE FOE - IF THERE WAS MORE OPEN DISCUSSION IT IS POSSIBLE THAT NOT ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI AGREE WITH THE EVIL AGENDA AND MIGHT IF THE PEOPLE SHOWED MORE OF THEIR ACCUSTOMED FIERY NATURE -AND FIGHT!!! - A CHANCE TO BRING GOOD OUT OF EVIL FOR THE BETTERMENT OF ALL MANKIND!- BUT IT IS UP TO EACH OF YOU TO BRAVELY MAKE A PLEDGE AND JOIN THE FIGHT! - NOTHING ELSE WILL SAVE YOUR FREEDOM - YOUR IDENTITY - YOUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE. -AND INDEED EVEN YOUR OWN LIFE!- AS UNLESS YOU ARE PART OF THE ELITE OR SMALL NUMBER OF SLAVES PERMITTED TO SERVE THE ILLUMINATI - YOUR CHANCES OF LIFE ARE NIL. - THIS IS AN OPEN SECRET BUT AS THE EFFECTS OF A BIG LIE - A BIG TRUTH IS ALSO HARD TO CONTEMPLATE - THE CHOICE IS YOURS!- MAKE IT SOON OR IT WILL BE AS OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL STATED TO A PACKED AND HUSHED HOUSE OF COMMONS SHORTLY BEFORE THE SECOND WORLD WAR WHEN FACTS WERE DESPERATELY NEEDED OF GERMANY'S GROWING STRENGTH FOR WAR AND THE NEED TO REARM BEFORE IT WAS - TOO!!! LATE!!! - THE SAME SITUATION APPLIES TODAY IN AUGUST, 2010 - WE ARE AT WAR! AGAINST A FORMIDABLE ENEMY - [THE BILDERBERGERS-ILLUMINATI] - THEIR INTEBNTIONS HIDDEN FROM SIGHT BUT ,NEVERTHELESS , IS A GREATER THREAT THAN THAT WHICH FACED THE COUNTRY THEN - BECAUSE THIS ENEMY HAS PLANS TO DESTROY THE GREATER PART OF THE POPULATION OF OUR PLANET EARTH - WE ASK WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? - + WE HAVE REMINDED YOU ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS OF THE BILDERBERGER/ILLUMINATI TACTIC OF THE BAD-GUY AND GOOD-GUY SCENARIO WHICH IS TO UNDERMINE SOCIETY AND THE MEANS TO JUSTIFY THEIR TOTALITARIAN MEASURES - WE KNOW HOW SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR DID SUCH A WONDERFUL JOB IN THIS DIRECTION AND WE NOW HERE THAT THE SO-CALLED GOOD GUY DAVID CAMERON IS DOING HIS BEST TO FOLLOW THEIR EXAMPLE! - + A TRULY NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF DISSINTERESTED PATRIOTS - NOT BILDERBERGERS WHO OWE ALLEGIANCE TO A FOREIGN MASONIC BODY - WOULD HAVE MORE SUPPORT FROM THE POPULACE - A ONE - TERM SERVICE IN PARLIAMENT TO AVOID PRESSURE ON AN MP TO GO AGAINST HIS CONSCIENCE. - POSSIBLY A RETURN MIGHT BE PERMITTED AFTER EACH TERM OF ABSENCE BUT THE IMPORTANTANCE OF THE MEASURE IS TO PERMIT MORE CITIZENS FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE WHO WISH TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY - IT SHOULD NOT BE A JOB FOR LIFE - THE EARLY GREEKS HAVE MANY LESSONS WHICH WE COULD UTILISE FOR BETTER GOVERNANCE! - BUT THE BILDERBERGERS ARE ENJOYING THEIR SPOILS WHETHER IN GOVERNMENT OR SO-CALLED OPPOSITION. - THEY HAVE MADE FOOLS OF US FOR TOO! LONG! -AS WE STATED BEFORE THE MAY6 GENERAL ELECTION THEY SHOULD BE OUTLAWED FROM SERVICE IN OUR ONCE SACRED AND HALLOWED CHAMBER OF WESTMINSTER WHICH THROUGHOUT ITS LONG DISTINGUISHED HISTORY HAS HAD MANY HONORABLE MEMBERS -WE URGENTLY NEED OTHERS OF A TRULY DISINTERESTED NATURE OF WHICH THE HOUSE HAS FEW AND REPLACE THE GREATER MAJORITY WITHOUT DELAY.- IT IS IN YOUR HANDS -WILL YOU DO IT? + - ON THE EU CON! - DO YOU REMEMBER!! - WE TOLD YOU SO BEFORE THE GENERAL ELECTION ON MAY 6-2010 THAT DAVID CAMERON'S PROMISES ARE WORTHLESS!!!-THIS IS NOW CONFIRMED IN THE EXCELLENT ARTICLE IN THE DAILY MAIL IN THE MELONIE PHILLIPS COLUMN ON AUGUST 2010  -  " EURO POLICE KNOCKING ON YOUR DOOR. - SURGERY HALTED BY 48 HOUR WEEK - SO MUCH FOR TORY PROMISES ON THE EU. - AN EXTRACT OF THE ARTICLE FOLLOWS: " When the Tories fought the [MAY 6-2010] general election they promised they would yield NO MORE POWER to the EUROPEAN UNION, and that they will seek to regain from the EU some of the powers that Britain has already lost.  -These pledges were designed to take the sting out of the fact that they were not, after all, going to offer A REFERENDUM on the EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION. - Three month's on , it looks increasingly as if NONE of THEIR PROMISES to SAFEGUARD BRITISH POWER is going to BE KEPT.   Indeed the COALITION GOVERNMENT seems to be going in precisely THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.- Last week, Home Secretary Theresa May told the COMMONS that BRITAIN had decided to OPT INTO the controversal EUROPEAN INVESTIGATIVE ORDER [ IT SOUNDS EXACTLY WHAT IT MEANS -A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE UNDER THE NEW WORLD ORDER-DONT YOU THINK?] - According to critics, this will mean that PROSECUTORS from ANY EU COUNTRY will be granted unprecedented and intrusive powers over the people of Britain. - They would be able to BUG the PHONE CALLS of BRITISH CITIZENS, monitor THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS and gain access to THEIR DNA if they suspected them of committing a CRIME in THOSE COUNTRIES - however trivial the offence, and EVEN IF IT WERE NOT A CRIME IN THE UK. + [Caps and Comments in square brackets are OURS!-For our BULLETIN FILE click under previous work for complete article from the Daily Mail click the following:   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1299512/Euro-police-knocking-door-Surgery-halted-48-hour-week-So-Tory-promises-EU.html - + WE NOW HEAR ON WEDNESDAY THE 4TH AUGUST THAT THE IRISH GOVERNMENT HAS AGREED WITH BRUSSELS TO ALLOW HER TROOPS TO SERVE IN OTHER COUTRIES IN THE EU AS A POLICE FORCE AND ALLOW FOREIGN TROOPS TO BE ON THEIR STREETS TO KEEP ORDER -+ WHEN YOU TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE LONG FIGHT OF THE IRISH PEOPLE FOR THEIR RIGHT TO GOVERN THEMSELVES WITH MUCH BLOODSHED GOING BACK HUNDREDS OF YEARS IT MAKES ONE WONDER WHY THEY BOTHERED AT ALL TO DO SO WHEN THEY HAVE MADE THEMSELVES SLAVES TO EVERY COUNTRY IN THE EU? - WE OURSELVES HAVE CONSTANTLY WARNED AGAINST THIS VERY MEASURE BUT IT SEEMS IN THE CASE OF IRELAND WHERE WE EXPECTED MORE OPPOSITION WE HAVE HAD A MOUSE-LIKE SURRENDER!!!! -AS INSTEAD OF AN EXPECTED STOICAL FIGHT FOR THEIR LIBERTY THEY HAD TAKEN THE BAIT AND THE TRAP HAD BEEN SPRUNG.- AS WE HAVE ALSO STATED FOR SOME TIME THE ONCE ALLIES OF IRISH INDEPENDENCE AMERICA HAS 350,000 FOREIGN TROOPS AND A LARGE NUMBER OF FORIEGN POLICE ON ITS SACRED SOIL TO BE USED BY AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT WHEN A FALSE FLAG ATTACK ENABLES MARTIAL LAW TO BE IMPLEMENTED AND THEN THE LARGE NUMBER OF CONCENTRATION CAMPS BUILT BECAUSE THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE AND EVIDENCE OF MEANS OF EXTERMINATION HAVE BEEN REVEALED - THEY HAVE MILLIONS OF PLASTIC COFFINS READY TO BE FILLED - AND IT ALL COMES UNDER FEMA - THESE CONCENTRATION CAMPS UNDER FEMA -WHICH CAME INTO BEING AFTER THE FALSE FLAG ATTACK ON 9/11 - WILL BE FILLED BY MILLIONS OF PATRIOTIC AMERICAN CITIZENS WHO CAN SEE THAT THEIR GOVERNMENT IS A SATANIC ENTITY RUN BY THE BANKSTERS AND TRAITORS AT THE HEAD OF THE MEXICAN - USA - CANADIAN GOVERNMENTS WHO ARE DESPERATE TO CONCLUDE THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION TO MATCH THE EUROPEAN UNION WHICH CHANNEL 4 IN IT'S DOCUMENTARY FAILED TO BRING MORE FACTS TO LIGHT? - FROM WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OF DAVID CAMERON'S PROMISE OF NO MORE POWERS TO THE EU HE WILL NO DOUBT FOLLOW THE TRAITOROUS LEAD OF THE IRISH GOVERNMENT. - AS WE HAVE SAID IF THERE WAS ONE COUNTRY IN THE EU THAT WE BELIEVED WOULD PROTECT ITS COUNTRY IT WOULD BE IRELAND.
 
     
 
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

May 11-2016

H F 779

 
     
     IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!  -LATEST! - NOVEMBER 11 IS A DAY TO REMEMBER OF THE SACRIFICE OF OVER 2,000,000 servicemen and women who gave their lives in DEFENCE OF THEIR COUNTRY in TWO WORLD WARS and the countless INJURED many bearing the SCARS and TRAUMA for the REST OF THEIR LIVES - IT HAS BEEN CONSTANTLY STATED that the EU would PREVENT WAR in EUROPE but the REALITY is DIFFERENT as it was NATO which kept THE PEACE until GERMANY went to aid her SECOND WORLD WAR ALLY CROATIA and the BULKANS exploded with ALBANIA and SERBIA at each others throats as old scores were being settled.  + OVER THE PAST CENTURY  OVER 150,000,000 PEOPLE HAVE DIED THE GREATER MAJORITY IN RUSSIA IN THE GULAGS It is stated that whereas the FASCISTS MURDERED at least 50,000,000 the COMMUNISTS MURDERED at least 100,000,000.  +In the DAILY MAIL on this UNFORGETTABLE DAY  we see an article 'THE END OF BRITAIN AS A NATION STATE?  NOT ON YOUR LIFE - MR RUMPY PUMPY. and we show the the following extract :- 'History teaches us that nation states  have always been the best guarantors of LIBERTTY-DEMOCRACY-PROSPERITY and THE RULE OF LAW.    ONLY STRONG NATION STATES HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DEFEND THEIR LIBERTIES AGAINST SUCH AS NAPOLEON - HITLER OR STALIN - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328568/Nation-states-dead-EU-chief-says-belief-countries-stand-lie.html

+[PREVIOUS STATEMENT]
   -WE NOW HAVE TO ALERT YOU! TO WATCH ALEX JONES OF PRISON PLANET.COM - -THE FREEDOM LOBBY IN THE USA. - WE HAVE ONLY IN THE PAST WEEK IN JULY 2010 COME ACROSS ANOTHER FEARLESS FREEDOM FIGHTER IN THE USA AN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN BORN A JEW BROTHER NATHANAEL KAPNER WHO MORE THAN MOST IS WELL AWARE OF THE THREAT FROM THE WORLD ZIONIST CONSPIRACY AS HIS MANY ARTICLES ON HIS WEBSITEa href="http://www.realzionist">http://www.realzionistnews.com

"REAL ZIONIST NEWS" CAN TESTIFY.- IT COULD SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -YOUR LIVELIHOOD AND EVEN YOUR LIFE! - JUST FOR ONCE MAKE TIME TO SEE POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO THAT YOU WILL EVER WATCH IN YOUR LIFE! - THE ISSUES ARE MOMENTOUS AND AFFECT EVERY ONE ON OUR PLANET. - MUCH YOU WILL LEARN WILL ASTOUND YOU AND SURPRISE YOU WHEN YOU HEAR HOW THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WHO HAVE BEEN PLANNING THEIR FINANCIAL COUP FOR OVER TWO CENTURIES AND A HALF TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH AN ELITE! OLIGARTHY IN A WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE WORLD'S WEALTHIEST ABD MOST POWERFUL AND LATER TO DISPOSE OF AT LEAST 85% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION. - THESE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ARE PRAYING TO SATAN TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM YOU! - TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - IN FACT YOU HAVE JUST TWO YEARS TO RALLY YOUR NEIGHBOURS TO THE TRUTH AS AN INSIDER HAS STATED THAT THE ELITE HAVE THEIR OWN ETHICS WHICH IS TO USE THEIR HOLLYWOOD EMPIRE TO PUT OUT WAR FILMS OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS SHOWING HOW THEY INTEND THEIR PURPOSE -  SO YOU HAVE THAT LONG! TO SAVE YOURSELF! - YOUR FAMILY! -YOUR FRIENDS! AND ALL FELLOW BEINGS ON OUR PLANET FROM THE SATANIC OLIGARTHY WHO WISH TO RULE THE WORLD THEIR WAY!- THE VIDEO WILL DETAIL IN ITS 2 HOUR VIDEO PRESENTATION 'THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC'. - IF YOU TURN YOUR FACE AWAY NOW!.-.YOU WILL SUFFER FOR IT!.- WE ARE CONVINCED THAT MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY ARE UNAWARE OF WHAT IS HAPPENNING TO THEIR COUNTRY - NATURALLY THEY ARE LOOKING TO SURVIVE IN ONE OF THE WORST RECESSIONS IN LIVING MEMORY OR HISTORY WNICH HAS BEEN ENGINEERED BY THE ILLUMINATI WHICH INCLUDES THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE - THE MAIN MONEY LENDERS IN THE WORLD SINCE THEIR 18TH CENTURY AND LATER INTRIGUES IN BAVARIA IN THE 19TH CENTURY AND HAVE SUPPORTED BOTH SIDES OF MAJOR WARS AND NO DOUBT SMALLER WARS IN ORDER TO INCREASE THEIR WEALTH AND POWER.- THEIR MAJOR TRIUMPH WAS TO GET THE UNITED NATIONS OFF THE GROUND AFTER WORLD WAR II BY ROCKEFELLER WHO OWNED THE LAND WHICH HE OFFERED IN ORDER THAT THE UN BUILDING COULD BE BUILT IN NEW YORK - SINCE THEN ALL UN ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN PART OF THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION WHICH ENGINNERED A PANDEMIC WHEN THE PREVIOUS CRITERA HAD NOT BEEN REACHED AND WORLD MONETARY FUND AND THE ELITE WHICH IS MADE UP OF OVER 6000 OF THE RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD WHO TO ASSIST THEM HAVE THEIR SERVANTS IN POLITICS - ACADEMICS -PRESS AND MEDIA AND FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE  - THE BILDERBERGERS IN ALL YOUR MAIN POLITIOCAL PARTIES TO DO THEIR BIDDING - SUCH AS GORDON BROWN - ED BALLS - PETER MANDELSON - DAVID MILIBAND AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR AND IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY -  KENNETH CLARKE - GEORGE OSBORNE - WILLIAM HAGUE -http://www.bilderberg.org/Bilderberg2009. WILLIAM HAGUE - DOUGLAS HURD - AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND NOT FORGETTING THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WITH PADDY ASHDOWN AND OTHERS WHO BY THEIR COMPLICITY INTEND BY VARIOUS MEANS - WAR - TOXIC VACCINES [MERCURY}- POVERTY (DESTRUCTION OF INDUSTRY -CAP AND TRADE) - POLLUTED WATER SUPPLIES- {FLUORIDE A POISON AND OTHER POLLUTANTS - TOXIC AIR SPRAYING AND DETENTION AS IN AMERICA WHERE THERE ARE NOW DETENTION CENTRES OR TO BE MORE PRECISE CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN MANY STATES ACROSS AMERICA IT IS OBVIOUS THE MAN IN THE STREET IS UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE DISASTER AWAITING THEM!  - IN OUR SMALL WAY WE AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR MANY YEARS AS ALEX JONES -PRISON PLANET.COM AND INFOWARS>COM AND MANY OTHER BRAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHEN THEY DISAPEAR FROM SIGHT - YOU WILL TRULY DOOMED TO SLAVERY OR DEATH.- IN OUR OWN ONE MAN CAMPAIGN 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' WE HAVE WITNESSED THE TOTAL IGORANCE OF THE PUBLIC TO WHAT IS IN STORE FOR THEM!  - AT LEAST WE WILL KNOW WHY! - BUT MILLIONS WILL BE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER AS SHEEPLE AND IT WILL ONLY DAWN ON SOME THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN NOTICE WHEN THEY COULD AND MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE FREE PEOPLE'S OF OUR WORLD! WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED BY OUR PARLIAMENT AND MONARCH - YOU ARE ONLY MONTH'S AWAY FROM LOSING YOUR ANCIENT FREEDOMS - YOUR UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY OF OVER 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING! - UNLESS YOU STIR YOURSELVES!          WE WARNED YOU PRIOR TO THE GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 THAT IT COULD BE THE LAST! - AS LISBON TREATY SAYS SO! - AS REGIONS/PROVINCES WILL BE THE ORDER OF THE DAY - BUT WE NOW KNOW THAT DAVID CAMERERON HAS STOOD DOWN THE REGIONAL ASSEMBLIES AT THE PRESENT TIME BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE WOULD NOT GET AWAY PROCEEDING WITH THEM AFTER HIS STANCE ABOUT NO MORE LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY TO BRUSSELS-WELL!-NOT YET! AS WE STATED WHETHER YOU VOTED NEW LABOUR - CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS YOU HAVE AGREED TO LOSE YOUR INHERITED SACRED 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN' - WHICH SHOULD BE PASSED ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS -  BECAUSE THEY WOULD RATHER 'SELLETH HIS BIRTHRIGHT FOR A MESS OF POTTAGE' WE NOW HEAR THAT THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY MACHINE IS BAFFLED AS TO WHY IT DID NOT DO BETTER AT THE POLLS.- BECAUSE THEY BETRAYED THOSE EUROSCEPTICS WHO HAD BELIEVED THEM OVER 38 YEARS THAT THEY WOULD CHANGE THE EU BUT APART FROM BRUSSELS GIVING GROUND ON CERTAIN MATTERS AND ONLY FOR AS LONG AS THEY FIND IT NECESSARY - THE CLOSER UNION WILL STILL GO AHEAD AS PLANNED.- AS WE HAVE STATED ELSEWHERE IT IS ALL ABOUT GRADUALISM . THE PEOPLE HAVE FAILED TO REALISE THAT EVERY SO-CALLED COMPROMISE WORKS TO THE BENEFIT OF BRUSSELS -THE EVIDENCE WAS CLEAR ON THE 1 JANUARY 2010 WHEN ENGLAND NO LONGER EXISTED AS A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE BUT REGIONS SHARED BY OTHER EUROPEAN REGIONS.  ONLY GERMANY HAS ESCAPED SUCH INIHILATION AND IRONICALLY IT WILL BE GERMANY WHICH MIGHT WITH THE COLLAPSE OF THE EURO AND THE IMERGENCE OF GERMAN IDENTITY AT HOME THAT MIGHT BRING BACK THE FREE INDEPENDENDEBNT NATION STATES WORKING TOGETHER FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY-  BUT BEFORE THIS CAN TAKE PLACE THERE IS A HERCULEAN TASK BEFORE US TO REGAIN FROM THE ZIONIST BANKSTERS THE CONTROL OF THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS IN THE WORLD BECAUSE WITHOUT DOING SO FREEDOM AND EVEN THE LIVES OF MOST OF MANKIND WILL DISAPEAR FOR EVER FROM OUR PLANET.ART OF                           MAIN ISSUES BULLETIN-UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                           EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                            THE LISBON TREATY HAS BEEN RATIFIED BY ALL!     YOUR PENALTY IS BE SLAVERY! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU! -  AS ON DECEMBER 1-2009 THE TREATY CAME INTO BEING AND ENGLAND DISAPPEARED FROM HISTORY AND EVEN FROM THE MAP OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE AND LOST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL IN THE BAD BARGAIN! - THANKS TO A TRAITOROUS SCOTSMAN GORDON BROWN WHO WITH HIS TARTAN CLAN HAS CERTAINLY TAKEN REVENGE FOR PAST TIMES!               Click           Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the           1999 European Elections.               Click           Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                 LINKS FROM BULLETIN FILE TO OTHER FILES!    nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ONLY MILLIONS ON THE STREETS CAN NOW SAVE US NOW! - BUT THERE IS NO LEADER OF FREEDOM TO COMPARE WITH OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL - TO RALLY THE PEOPLE! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!     OVER 1'600 BULLETIN'S! AVAILABLE HERE!
UNITY OF ENGLISH PARTIES?                MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!                Click Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the 1999 European Elections.               Click Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!
 
     
 

 

JUNE 17,2014

H.F.154

 
[YOU DID IT! -

BUT IT MUST BE A MUCH GREATER TURNOUT IN MAY 2015 TO OBTAIN A COMPLETE VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE!]

 

The most extraordinary result in 100 years': Farage hails UKIP triumph as Labour and the Tories are humiliated and the Lib Dems are left with just one MEP

  • Tories, Labour and Lib Dems face fresh turmoil as results are announced
  • UKIP tops the polls in large parts of the country, pushing Labour into 2nd
  • BNP loses its only remaining seat in Brussels as Griffin concedes defeat 
  • Turnout across 28 EU members states estimated at 41.3% 
  • France’s far-right National Front was on course for a massive victory
  • Calls for Clegg to quit as Lib Dem leader even before tonight's EU bloodbath
  • 'Weird' Miliband warned 'outlook is grim' unless he gets a grip of Labour  

By Matt Chorley,

 Mailonline Political Editor



DAILY MAIL

Will-earth-Ukip-confident-triggering-political-earthquake-winning-European-elections-tonight.
Follow us:

@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS]

MARCH-2014

 

 

H.F.155

THE ENGLISH-A MATTER OF FACT.

HISTORICAL SURVEY.

CHAPTER 1

1. Britons and Englishmen.

The people who lived in our island fifteen hundred years ago [written in1903]  were not Englishmen, nor did they speak the English Language.  When in our flights of rhetoric or poetry, we declare that we glory in the name of Britons, or sing that Britons never shall be slaves, our intentions are patriotic, but our language is apt to be misleading [Note: Gordon Brown and others of the TARTAN CLAN! ]  

Britons we may  indeed call ourselves. if in doing so we mean nothing more than this, that we are inhabitants of Britain.   But when we speak of ourselves as Britons, or as a British race, let us bear in mind such facts as these:- [Note: again!- Gordon brown]  that we are in the main of  English origin; [But for how long after 2014 is anyone's guess. ] That our English forefathers conquered the Britons, deprived them of their lands, and made many of them slaves; that the English settled in the country belonging to the Britons, and  their descendents have remained here ever since.

Firmly grasping these truths, we may, if we like apply the name Britons to our fellow-countrymen, just as we apply the name of Great britain to our country [Gordon brown-please note!]    nO DANGER OF MISCONCEPTION LURKS IN THE WORD 'britain' AS THE GEOGRAPHICAL NAME OF THE ISLAND, FOR OUR ISLAND REMAINS THE SAME: iT IS THE POPULATION WHICH HAS CHANGED. (alfred s.west,m.a.)

in an island with a land named

england!

june-2014

H.F.156

A MESSAGE TO DAVID CAMERON

You may lose your primeministership before May-2015 but if you stand firm in your fight to  give THE PEOPLE! their rightful REFERENDUM on the SATANIC-COLLECTIVIST-WASTEFUL-UNDEMOCRATIC EUROPEAN UNION before that date, you will be REMEMBERED as a STATESMAN with a VISION who at the eleventh hour gave his SUPPORT to THE PEOPLE and away from POLITICIANS and will be REMEMBERED as other GREAT STATESMEN such as LORD CHATHAM-PITT THE YOUNGER-DISRAELI-CHURCHILL and OTHERS who advanced the PROGRESS of a FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of over 1500 years in our island home.

WE ASK ARE YOU WITH THE PEOPLE OR THE POLITICIANS OF ENGLAND?

You have little time to enter the history books as the SAVIOUR not only of ENGLAND but also of ALL the once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES of EUROPE which past STATESMEN from our ISLAND HOME gave them FREEDOM.

 

WILL YOU DO IT?

Hopefully as one of our greatest prime ministers of the early 18th century William Pitt, Earl of Chatham-(1708-1778) stated on the Speech 9th November, 1783]

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

 

YOU CAN DO IT!

 

DECISION

'Once to every man and nation comes the moment to decide'

In the strife of TRUTH with FALSEHOOD for the good or evil side.'

J.R.Lowell. The Present Crisis.

[HOW APPROPRIATE]

*

 

WE ARE IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE-READ HOW THEY HAVE BAFFLED YOUR MIND TO HIDE THE TRUTH!

     
    THIS YOU NEED TO KNOW! - WHY DO WE DO THIS?   TO ALERT YOU! OF THE DANGERS OF FLUORIDE IN YOUR DRINKING WATER AND HOW IT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR A HOST OF DIFFERENT MEDICAL CONDITIONS -INCLUDING CANCER,BRITTLE BONE DISEASE.IMMUNE DIFICIENCY, MENTAL SEDATION, AND EVEN REDUCED IQ. THIS HAS ALL BEEN KNOWN TO THE POWERS -THAT SINCE THE 1920'S - DESPITE THE FACT THAT FLUORIDE HAS BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE NO EFFECT WHATYSOEVER IN REDUCING DENTAL PROBLEMS, THE POWER-THAT-BE INSIST ON PUTTING IT IN OUR TAP WATER>   FLUORIDE IS A TOXIC INDUSTRIAL BI-PRODUCT FROM THE ALUMINIUM INDUSTRY.  IT IS CLASSIFIED AS HAZARDOUS WASTE-    CONSUMPTION OF FLUORIDE-EVEN IN TINY AMOUNTS - IS EXTREMELY HARMFUL TO THE BODY - THIS IS AN ESTABLISHED FACT.  - ONE OF THE FIRST USES FOR FLUORIDE WAS IN THE 1930'S AND 1940'S WHEN FLUORIDATED WATER WAS GIVEN TO PRISONERS OF NAZI CONCENTRATION CAMPS TO CLOUD THEIR THINKING ABILITY AND WEAKEN THEIR MENTAL RESOLVE.  THIS IS THE SAME TACTIC IS NOW BEING USED ON US, BY OUR VERY OWN LEADERS - THOSE YOU VOTE FOR -TO THE EXTENT WHERE MANY PEOPLE ARE INCAPABLE OF THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX.  - ALL THE STUDIES IN EVERY STATE AND COUNTRY SHOW THAT FLUORIDE DOES NOT IMPROVE THE STATE OF YOUR TEETH OR GUMS.  AND EVEN IF IT DID HELP IN ANY WAY, WHY DOES THIS HIGHLY TOXIC SUBSTANCE HAVE TO BE PUT IN OUR DRINKING WATER?  THINK ABOUT IT.  -THERE'S ONLY ONE LOGICAL REASON TO PUT IT INTO OUR WATER THE ELITE ARE USING FLURIDE AS ONE OF THEIR MANY TOOLS TO ASSAULT OUR BODY AND MIND FOR THEIR OWN GAIN. - WE ARE NOTHING MORE THAN BATTERY CELLS TO THEM.  WE ARE JUST PROGRAMMABLE, INCOME GENERATING,TAX-PAYING CONSUMERS.   - THEY EXTRACT MONEY FROM OUR LABOUR, OUR SWEAT-EQUITY,AND THEY USE THAT MONEY TO BUILD PRISON WEALLS AROUND US SO THEY CAN CONTROL US EVEN MORE.  IF THEY HAD THEIR WAY,WE'D ALL BE NOTHING MORE THAN ROBOTS WHO DO AS WE'RE TOLD AND NEVER COMPLAIN.  THE LAST THING THEY WANT IS AN INFORMED,ACTIVE AND CLOSLY -KNIT SOCIETY OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE BRAINS -THE HEART-THE COURAGE AND THE WILL TO CHANGE THE STATUS QUO>  THEREFORE,THEY USE EVERY TOOL AT THEIR DISPOSAL TO KEEP US ALL IN A PERPETUAL DUMPED_DOWN                                                                                                                                                                                                                         T                                                                R                                                                                           WATCH ALEX JONES OF PRISON PLANET.COM - -THE FREEDOM LOBBY IN THE USA. - IT COULD SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -YOUR LIVELIHOOD AND EVEN YOUR LIFE! - JUST FOR ONCE MAKE TIME TO SEE POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO THAT YOU WILL EVER WATCH IN YOUR LIFE! - THE ISSUES ARE MOMENTOUS AND AFFECT EVERY ONE ON OUR PLANET. - MUCH YOU WILL LEARN WILL ASTOUND YOU AND SURPRISE YOU WHEN YOU HEAR HOW THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WHO HAVE BEEN PLANNING THEIR FINANCIAL COUP FOR OVER TWO CENTURIES AND A HALF TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH AN ELITE! OLIGARTHY IN A WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE WORLD'S WEALTHIEST ABD MOST POWERFUL AND LATER TO DISPOSE OF AT LEAST 85% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION. - THESE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ARE PRAYING TO SATAN TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM YOU! - TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - IN FACT YOU HAVE JUST TWO YEARS TO RALLY YOUR NEIGHBOURS TO THE TRUTH AS AN INSIDER HAS STATED THAT THE ELITE HAVE THEIR OWN ETHICS WHICH IS TO USE THEIR HOLLYWOOD EMPIRE TO PUT OUT WAR FILMS OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS SHOWING HOW THEY INTEND THEIR PURPOSE -  SO YOU HAVE THAT LONG! TO SAVE YOURSELF! - YOUR FAMILY! -YOUR FRIENDS! AND ALL FELLOW BEINGS ON OUR PLANET FROM THE SATANIC OLIGARTHY WHO WISH TO RULE THE WORLD THEIR WAY!- THE VIDEO WILL DETAIL IN ITS 2 HOUR VIDEO PRESENTATION 'THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC'. - IF YOU TURN YOUR FACE AWAY NOW!.-.YOU WILL SUFFER FOR IT!.- WE ARE CONVINCED THAT MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY ARE UNAWARE OF WHAT IS HAPPENNING TO THEIR COUNTRY - NATURALLY THEY ARE LOOKING TO SURVIVE IN ONE OF THE WORST RECESSIONS IN LIVING MEMORY OR HISTORY WNICH HAS BEEN ENGINEERED BY THE ILLUMINATI WHICH INCLUDES THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE - THE MAIN MONEY LENDERS IN THE WORLD SINCE THEIR 18TH CENTURY AND LATER INTRIGUES IN BAVARIA IN THE 19TH CENTURY AND HAVE SUPPORTED BOTH SIDES OF MAJOR WARS AND NO DOUBT SMALLER WARS IN ORDER TO INCREASE THEIR WEALTH AND POWER.- THEIR MAJOR TRIUMPH WAS TO GET THE UNITED NATIONS OFF THE GROUND AFTER WORLD WAR II BY ROCKEFELLER WHO OWNED THE LAND WHICH HE OFFERED IN ORDER THAT THE UN BUILDING COULD BE BUILT IN NEW YORK - SINCE THEN ALL UN ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN PART OF THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION WHICH ENGINNERED A PANDEMIC WHEN THE PREVIOUS CRITERA HAD NOT BEEN REACHED AND WORLD MONETARY FUND AND THE ELITE WHICH IS MADE UP OF OVER 6000 OF THE RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD WHO TO ASSIST THEM HAVE THEIR SERVANTS IN POLITICS - ACADEMICS -PRESS AND MEDIA AND FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE  - THE BILDERBERGERS IN ALL YOUR MAIN POLITIOCAL PARTIES TO DO THEIR BIDDING - SUCH AS GORDON BROWN - ED BALLS - PETER MANDELSON - DAVID MILIBAND AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR AND IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY  KENNETH CLARKE - GEORGE OSBORNE - WILLIAM HAGUE -http://www.bilderberg.org/Bilderberg2009. WILLIAM HAGUE - DOUGLAS HURD - AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND NOT FORGETTING THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WITH PADDY ASHDOWN AND OTHERS WHO BY THEIR COMPLICITY INTEND BY VARIOUS MEANS - WAR - TOXIC VACCINES [MERCURY}- POVERTY (DESTRUCTION OF INDUSTRY -CAP AND TRADE) - POLLUTED WATER SUPPLIES- {FLUORIDE A POISON AND OTHER POLLUTANTS - TOXIC AIR SPRAYING AND DETENTION AS IN AMERICA WHERE THERE ARE NOW DETENTION CENTRES OR TO BE MORE PRECISE CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN MANY STATES ACROSS AMERICA IT IS OBVIOUS THE MAN IN THE STREET IS UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE DISASTER AWAITING THEM!  - IN OUR SMALL WAY WE AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR MANY YEARS AS ALEX JONES -PRISON PLANET >COM AND INFOWARS>COM AND MANY OTHER BRAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHEN THEY DISAPEAR FROM SIGHT - YOU WILL TRULY DOOMED TO SLAVERY OR DEATH.- IN OUR OWN ONE MAN CAMPAIGN 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' WE HAVE WITNESSED THE TOTAL IGORANCE OF THE PUBLIC TO WHAT IS IN STORE FOR THEM!  - AT LEAST WE WILL KNOW WHY! - BUT MILLIONS WILL BE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER AS SHEEP AND IT WILL ONLY DAWN ON SOME THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN NOTICE WHEN THEY COULD AND MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE FREE PEOPLE'S OF OUR WORLD! WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED BY OUR PARLIAMENT AND MONARCH - YOU ARE ONLY MONTH'S AWAY FROM LOSING YOUR ANCIENT FREEDOMS - YOUR UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY OF OVER 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING! - UNLESS YOU STIR YOURSELVES!          THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 COULD BE THE LAST! - AS LISBON TREATY SAYS SO! - AS REGIONS/PROVINCES WILL BE THE ORDER OF THE DAY - REMEMBER WHETHER YOU VOTE NEW LABOUR - CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS YOU HAVE AGREED TO LOSE YOUR INHERITED SACRED 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN' - WHICH SHOULD BE PASSED ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS -  BECAUSE THEY WOULD RATHER 'SELLETH HIS BIRTHRIGHT FOR A MESS OF POTTAGE'                           MAIN ISSUES BULLETIN-UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                           EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                           WHEN THE LISBON TREATY IS RATIFIED BY ALL!     YOUR PENALTY WILL BE SLAVERY! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU! - ON DECEMBER 1-2009 THE TREATY CAME INTO BEING AND ENGLAND DISAPPEARED FROM HISTORY AND EVEN FROM THE MAP OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE AND LOST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL IN THE BAD BARGAIN! - THANKS TO SCOTSMAN GORDON BROWN WHO WITH HIS TARTAN CLAN HAS CERTAINLY TAKEN REVENGE FOR PAST TIMES!               Click           Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the           1999 European Elections.               Click           Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                 LINKS FROM BULLETIN FILE TO OTHER FILES!    nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ONLY MILLIONS ON THE STREETS CAN NOW SAVE US NOW! - BUT THERE IS NO LEADER OF FREEDOM TO COMPARE WITH OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL - TO RALLY THE PEOPLE! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!     OVER 1'600 BULLETIN'S! AVAILABLE HERE!  
     

JULY 1-2014

 

BUT

News for DAILY MAIL-EXPOSED CAMERON'S EU SHAM

Leaked letter reveals PM hatched anti-Brexit plot... while still telling voters he could campaign to LEAVE.

The man's a bounder that's for sure.

*

Tuesday ,May 17,2016

H.F.157

 
     
     IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!  -LATEST! - NOVEMBER 11 IS A DAY TO REMEMBER OF THE SACRIFICE OF OVER 2,000,000 servicemen and women who gave their lives in DEFENCE OF THEIR COUNTRY in TWO WORLD WARS and the countless INJURED many bearing the SCARS and TRAUMA for the REST OF THEIR LIVES - IT HAS BEEN CONSTANTLY STATED that the EU would PREVENT WAR in EUROPE but the REALITY is DIFFERENT as it was NATO which kept THE PEACE until GERMANY went to aid her SECOND WORLD WAR ALLY CROATIA and the BULKANS exploded with ALBANIA and SERBIA at each others throats as old scores were being settled.  + OVER THE PAST CENTURY  OVER 150,000,000 PEOPLE HAVE DIED THE GREATER MAJORITY IN RUSSIA IN THE GULAGS It is stated that whereas the FASCISTS MURDERED at least 50,000,000 the COMMUNISTS MURDERED at least 100,000,000.  +In the DAILY MAIL on this UNFORGETTABLE DAY  we see an article 'THE END OF BRITAIN AS A NATION STATE?  NOT ON YOUR LIFE - MR RUMPY PUMPY. and we show the the following extract :- 'History teaches us that nation states  have always been the best guarantors of LIBERTTY-DEMOCRACY-PROSPERITY and THE RULE OF LAW.    ONLY STRONG NATION STATES HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DEFEND THEIR LIBERTIES AGAINST SUCH AS NAPOLEON - HITLER OR STALIN - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328568/Nation-states-dead-EU-chief-says-belief-countries-stand-lie.html

+[PREVIOUS STATEMENT]
   -WE NOW HAVE TO ALERT YOU! TO WATCH ALEX JONES OF PRISON PLANET.COM - -THE FREEDOM LOBBY IN THE USA. - WE HAVE ONLY IN THE PAST WEEK IN JULY 2010 COME ACROSS ANOTHER FEARLESS FREEDOM FIGHTER IN THE USA AN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN BORN A JEW BROTHER NATHANAEL KAPNER WHO MORE THAN MOST IS WELL AWARE OF THE THREAT FROM THE WORLD ZIONIST CONSPIRACY AS HIS MANY ARTICLES ON HIS WEBSITEa href="http://www.realzionist">http://www.realzionistnews.com

"REAL ZIONIST NEWS" CAN TESTIFY.- IT COULD SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -YOUR LIVELIHOOD AND EVEN YOUR LIFE! - JUST FOR ONCE MAKE TIME TO SEE POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO THAT YOU WILL EVER WATCH IN YOUR LIFE! - THE ISSUES ARE MOMENTOUS AND AFFECT EVERY ONE ON OUR PLANET. - MUCH YOU WILL LEARN WILL ASTOUND YOU AND SURPRISE YOU WHEN YOU HEAR HOW THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WHO HAVE BEEN PLANNING THEIR FINANCIAL COUP FOR OVER TWO CENTURIES AND A HALF TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH AN ELITE! OLIGARTHY IN A WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE WORLD'S WEALTHIEST ABD MOST POWERFUL AND LATER TO DISPOSE OF AT LEAST 85% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION. - THESE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ARE PRAYING TO SATAN TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM YOU! - TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - IN FACT YOU HAVE JUST TWO YEARS TO RALLY YOUR NEIGHBOURS TO THE TRUTH AS AN INSIDER HAS STATED THAT THE ELITE HAVE THEIR OWN ETHICS WHICH IS TO USE THEIR HOLLYWOOD EMPIRE TO PUT OUT WAR FILMS OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS SHOWING HOW THEY INTEND THEIR PURPOSE -  SO YOU HAVE THAT LONG! TO SAVE YOURSELF! - YOUR FAMILY! -YOUR FRIENDS! AND ALL FELLOW BEINGS ON OUR PLANET FROM THE SATANIC OLIGARTHY WHO WISH TO RULE THE WORLD THEIR WAY!- THE VIDEO WILL DETAIL IN ITS 2 HOUR VIDEO PRESENTATION 'THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC'. - IF YOU TURN YOUR FACE AWAY NOW!.-.YOU WILL SUFFER FOR IT!.- WE ARE CONVINCED THAT MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY ARE UNAWARE OF WHAT IS HAPPENNING TO THEIR COUNTRY - NATURALLY THEY ARE LOOKING TO SURVIVE IN ONE OF THE WORST RECESSIONS IN LIVING MEMORY OR HISTORY WNICH HAS BEEN ENGINEERED BY THE ILLUMINATI WHICH INCLUDES THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE - THE MAIN MONEY LENDERS IN THE WORLD SINCE THEIR 18TH CENTURY AND LATER INTRIGUES IN BAVARIA IN THE 19TH CENTURY AND HAVE SUPPORTED BOTH SIDES OF MAJOR WARS AND NO DOUBT SMALLER WARS IN ORDER TO INCREASE THEIR WEALTH AND POWER.- THEIR MAJOR TRIUMPH WAS TO GET THE UNITED NATIONS OFF THE GROUND AFTER WORLD WAR II BY ROCKEFELLER WHO OWNED THE LAND WHICH HE OFFERED IN ORDER THAT THE UN BUILDING COULD BE BUILT IN NEW YORK - SINCE THEN ALL UN ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN PART OF THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION WHICH ENGINNERED A PANDEMIC WHEN THE PREVIOUS CRITERA HAD NOT BEEN REACHED AND WORLD MONETARY FUND AND THE ELITE WHICH IS MADE UP OF OVER 6000 OF THE RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD WHO TO ASSIST THEM HAVE THEIR SERVANTS IN POLITICS - ACADEMICS -PRESS AND MEDIA AND FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE  - THE BILDERBERGERS IN ALL YOUR MAIN POLITIOCAL PARTIES TO DO THEIR BIDDING - SUCH AS GORDON BROWN - ED BALLS - PETER MANDELSON - DAVID MILIBAND AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR AND IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY -  KENNETH CLARKE - GEORGE OSBORNE - WILLIAM HAGUE -http://www.bilderberg.org/Bilderberg2009. WILLIAM HAGUE - DOUGLAS HURD - AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND NOT FORGETTING THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WITH PADDY ASHDOWN AND OTHERS WHO BY THEIR COMPLICITY INTEND BY VARIOUS MEANS - WAR - TOXIC VACCINES [MERCURY}- POVERTY (DESTRUCTION OF INDUSTRY -CAP AND TRADE) - POLLUTED WATER SUPPLIES- {FLUORIDE A POISON AND OTHER POLLUTANTS - TOXIC AIR SPRAYING AND DETENTION AS IN AMERICA WHERE THERE ARE NOW DETENTION CENTRES OR TO BE MORE PRECISE CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN MANY STATES ACROSS AMERICA IT IS OBVIOUS THE MAN IN THE STREET IS UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE DISASTER AWAITING THEM!  - IN OUR SMALL WAY WE AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR MANY YEARS AS ALEX JONES -PRISON PLANET.COM AND INFOWARS>COM AND MANY OTHER BRAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHEN THEY DISAPEAR FROM SIGHT - YOU WILL TRULY DOOMED TO SLAVERY OR DEATH.- IN OUR OWN ONE MAN CAMPAIGN 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' WE HAVE WITNESSED THE TOTAL IGORANCE OF THE PUBLIC TO WHAT IS IN STORE FOR THEM!  - AT LEAST WE WILL KNOW WHY! - BUT MILLIONS WILL BE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER AS SHEEPLE AND IT WILL ONLY DAWN ON SOME THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN NOTICE WHEN THEY COULD AND MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE FREE PEOPLE'S OF OUR WORLD! WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED BY OUR PARLIAMENT AND MONARCH - YOU ARE ONLY MONTH'S AWAY FROM LOSING YOUR ANCIENT FREEDOMS - YOUR UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY OF OVER 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING! - UNLESS YOU STIR YOURSELVES!          WE WARNED YOU PRIOR TO THE GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 THAT IT COULD BE THE LAST! - AS LISBON TREATY SAYS SO! - AS REGIONS/PROVINCES WILL BE THE ORDER OF THE DAY - BUT WE NOW KNOW THAT DAVID CAMERERON HAS STOOD DOWN THE REGIONAL ASSEMBLIES AT THE PRESENT TIME BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE WOULD NOT GET AWAY PROCEEDING WITH THEM AFTER HIS STANCE ABOUT NO MORE LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY TO BRUSSELS-WELL!-NOT YET! AS WE STATED WHETHER YOU VOTED NEW LABOUR - CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS YOU HAVE AGREED TO LOSE YOUR INHERITED SACRED 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN' - WHICH SHOULD BE PASSED ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS -  BECAUSE THEY WOULD RATHER 'SELLETH HIS BIRTHRIGHT FOR A MESS OF POTTAGE' WE NOW HEAR THAT THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY MACHINE IS BAFFLED AS TO WHY IT DID NOT DO BETTER AT THE POLLS.- BECAUSE THEY BETRAYED THOSE EUROSCEPTICS WHO HAD BELIEVED THEM OVER 38 YEARS THAT THEY WOULD CHANGE THE EU BUT APART FROM BRUSSELS GIVING GROUND ON CERTAIN MATTERS AND ONLY FOR AS LONG AS THEY FIND IT NECESSARY - THE CLOSER UNION WILL STILL GO AHEAD AS PLANNED.- AS WE HAVE STATED ELSEWHERE IT IS ALL ABOUT GRADUALISM . THE PEOPLE HAVE FAILED TO REALISE THAT EVERY SO-CALLED COMPROMISE WORKS TO THE BENEFIT OF BRUSSELS -THE EVIDENCE WAS CLEAR ON THE 1 JANUARY 2010 WHEN ENGLAND NO LONGER EXISTED AS A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE BUT REGIONS SHARED BY OTHER EUROPEAN REGIONS.  ONLY GERMANY HAS ESCAPED SUCH INIHILATION AND IRONICALLY IT WILL BE GERMANY WHICH MIGHT WITH THE COLLAPSE OF THE EURO AND THE IMERGENCE OF GERMAN IDENTITY AT HOME THAT MIGHT BRING BACK THE FREE INDEPENDENDEBNT NATION STATES WORKING TOGETHER FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY-  BUT BEFORE THIS CAN TAKE PLACE THERE IS A HERCULEAN TASK BEFORE US TO REGAIN FROM THE ZIONIST BANKSTERS THE CONTROL OF THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS IN THE WORLD BECAUSE WITHOUT DOING SO FREEDOM AND EVEN THE LIVES OF MOST OF MANKIND WILL DISAPEAR FOR EVER FROM OUR PLANET.ART OF                           MAIN ISSUES BULLETIN-UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                           EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                            THE LISBON TREATY HAS BEEN RATIFIED BY ALL!     YOUR PENALTY IS BE SLAVERY! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU! -  AS ON DECEMBER 1-2009 THE TREATY CAME INTO BEING AND ENGLAND DISAPPEARED FROM HISTORY AND EVEN FROM THE MAP OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE AND LOST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL IN THE BAD BARGAIN! - THANKS TO A TRAITOROUS SCOTSMAN GORDON BROWN WHO WITH HIS TARTAN CLAN HAS CERTAINLY TAKEN REVENGE FOR PAST TIMES!               Click           Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the           1999 European Elections.               Click           Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                 LINKS FROM BULLETIN FILE TO OTHER FILES!    nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ONLY MILLIONS ON THE STREETS CAN NOW SAVE US NOW! - BUT THERE IS NO LEADER OF FREEDOM TO COMPARE WITH OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL - TO RALLY THE PEOPLE! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!     OVER 1'600 BULLETIN'S! AVAILABLE HERE!
UNITY OF ENGLISH PARTIES?                MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!                Click Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the 1999 European Elections.               Click Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!
 
     
 
[WHAT A WASTE MARTA!-

STILL IN THE COMFORT ZONE AS  WITH OTHER

CON PARTY EUROSCEPTICS.

THE FUTURE OF YOUR COUNTRY

ENGLAND

 IS IN YOUR HANDS -WILL YOU BETRAY IT OR SWALLOW YOUR JUST ANGER AND FIGHT FOR YOUR COUNTRY ON

 MAY  6-2015?]

 
 
*
[WHAT A WASTE OF AN EXCELLENT CANDIDATE TO RETURN TO THE FOLD OUT OF HER 'COMFORT ZONE' WITH THE CON PARTY. WE AGREE WITH HER COMMENTS ABOUT FARAGE AND UKIP AS OUR OWN ATTENDANCE AND COMMENTS OVER THE YEARS HAVE SHOWN BUT AT THIS CRUCIAL JUNCTURE

IN OUR ISLANDS HISTORY

TO RECLAIM THE RETURN OF OUR

 FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

 WE NEED ALL COMPETENT EX-CANDIDATES OF UKIP  AND THOSE OF INSIDE KNOWLEDGE OF

THE SATANIC-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -WASTEFUL- EUROPEAN UNION

SUCH AS MARTA TO RETURN TO THE FOLD FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION IN MAY-2015  TO ENSURE THAT ALL HANDS ARE ON ON DECK TO SINK THE

GANG OF THREE

OUT OF TRACE IN THE POLITICAL SYSTEM IN WESTMINSTER.]

IN HER HEART MARTA KNOWS THAT THERE IS NO CHANCE WHATSOEVER OF ANY MAJOR CHANGE IN THE EU . IT CANNOT - BECAUSE THAT IS THE NATURE OF T

 BEAST!

HE

-AND YOU WELL KNOW THAT MARTA AND STILL YOU WORK FOR THE ENEMY BECAUSE YOU WERE BETRAYED BY ANOTHER WHO WE NOW UNDERSTAND WAS AS WAS  THE PARTY-UKIP A  CREATURE OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY AT ITS CREATION. BUT WITH THE SPOTLIGHT ON FARAGE AND OTHERS THEY HAVE TO SEE THEIR FALSE COLOURS TAKE ON LEGITIMACY BECAUSE THE PUBLIC MOMENTUM WILL NOT ALLOW THEM TO BETRAY THEIR SPONTANEOUS AND GATHERING SUPPORT FROM ACROSS THE POLITICAL DIVIDE WHICH WILL ENSURE THAT THEY CAN NO LONGER PLAY FALSE

 WE HAVE WARNED THEIR FOLLOWERS TO ENSURE THAT

NO DEALS WITH THE CON PARTY WHO BETRAYED THEIR CONSERVATIVE FOLLOWERS IN 1972 AND AGAIN IN 1975 WITH LIES AND GROSS DECEIT AS THE ARCH NAZI TRAITOR FOR 60 YEARS WHO TOLD THE TRUTH ABOUT WHY HE DECEIVED THE PEOPLE ABOUT THE EU SHORTLY BEFORE HIS DEATH IN 2005. ]

MARTA WE NEED YOU!

DON'T TELL PORKIES ABOUT THE EU.

REVENGE IS SWEET BUT IS IT RIGHT?

 

'Revenge, at first, though sweet, bitter, ere long, back n itself recoils.'

MILTON

'The best manner of avenging ourselves is by not resembling him who has injured us.'

JANE PORTER.

*

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND HIGHLIGHTING ARE OURS]

JUNE-2014

 

 

H.F.158

 
 

BLOCKBUSTER!

 

HOW the EU makes

BRITAIN

IMPOSSIBLE to GOVERN.

 

*News for DAILY MAIL-HOW THE EU MAKES BRITAIN IMPOSSIBLE TO GOVERN

By

STEVE HILTON

With devastating logic, based on his years at the heart of power, the PM's former policy guru makes an explosive intervention in the Brexit debate-and argues we simply

HAVE to LEAVE.

 

 EXTRACT

NOT long after starting work in Downing street, I found  myself on a Eurostar train heading for Brussels. It was an eye-0opening trip. BUT its origin lay in a truly shocking discovery some weeks earlier.

Before the  2010 general election, Francis Maud and Oliver Letwin, two of the Conservative Party's key policymakers, and I had worked with each Tory  shadow minister on detailed plans for the implementation of our policies-including work to understand how the EU would affect what we wanted to do.

We thought we had a pretty good idea how to handle- or ideally, circum-navigate-the constraints imposed by European rules, regulations and bureaucracy. However, we were little prepared for the

SHEER SCALE OF IT AL.

After  just a few weeks in government, I was struck by how many things the Government was doing that the Prime Minister and his team didn't just not know about

BUT ACTIVELY DISAGREED WITH.

I investigated. It turned out that every few days, a pile of paperwork about a foot high was circulated in WHITEHALL. The paperwork gave the go-ahead for Government action and was supposedly based non written approval from the relevant ministers.

BUT HERE'S THE CATCH:

ministers were given 2 DAYS to respond to any proposal. If no response came, then this was taken as a 'YES'.

THERE IS NO WAY ANY MINISTER COULD POSSIBLY READ ALL THE PROPOSALS BY THE DEADLINE.

*

Even our man in Brussels didn't understand how the EU really works.

*

Furthermore, there was an unspoken rule that one department wouldn't interfere in proposals coming from another. In fact, as I recall, there was only one minister who regularly did so (much to the consternation of the others), and that was Michael Gove.

From my vantage point at No 10, though, I wanted to know where it all came from. What were these requests for policy clearance', as they are known? How many were really necessary for the delivery of our promises?

I ASKED FOR A DETAILED AUDIT

It turned out that some 30 per cent of government action was relevant to what we were supposed to be doing. The rest-you guessed it-was generated from with the

CIVIL SERVICE MACHINE

the majority coming from the

EU.

That's why I found myself on that Eurostar to Brussels. I wanted to know: how exactly do we end up with all these policies

WE DON'T WANT,

which

NO ONE IN BRITAIN VOTED FOR,

and which

WASTE SO MUCH TIME-ENERGY AND MONEY?

With us on the journey was Sir Kim Darroch, then Britain's Permanent Representative to the European Union-our top EU diplomat.

He briefed us on Brussels procedures, and how we might stop-or at least reduce-the flow of

UNWANTED BUREACRACY.

It was a fascinating and enlightened conversation. The only problem was: almost everything he told us

TURNED OUT TO BE COMPLETELY WRONG.

We spent the following day meeting various players in the Brussels set-up, in the European Commission, Parliament and Council, who explained how things really got done. And it slowly dawned on us that the man tasked with representing Britain in the EU literally

DIDN'T UNDERSTAND HOW IT WORKED.

Now, before anyone jumps  down my throat, saying 'there he goes again, attacking the civil service',

I WANT TO MAKE CLEAR THAT I HAVE THE HIGHEST RESPECT FOR SIR KIM, WHO IS A MODEL PUBLIC SERVANT, AND NOW OUR AMBASSADOR IN WASHINGTON.

It's not his fault: it's the system that's to blame.

It's become so complicated, so secretive, so impenetrable that its's way beyond the ability of any British government to make it work to our advantage-even though I have no doubt that things have improved since tthe Coalition Government's early days.

In this debate on the EU referendum, it's easy to throw around terms like 'SOVEREIGNTY' and 'DEMOCRACY':: FREEDOM' and BUREAUCRACY. But in the end we're debating not the some abstract concept, but a very specific question about

HOW OUR COUNTRY SHOULD BE RUN.

And my view, based on a pragmatic, non idealogical assessment of how the EU operates, is that as long as we are members, our country cannot be 'run'. Membership of the EU makes Britain literally.

 UN-GOVERNABLE

in a sense that

NO ADMINISTRATION ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE CAN GOVERN THE COUNTRY.

A democracy is based on the notion that the people-or their directly-elected representatives-are able to decide issues  for

THEMSELVES.

And yet membership of the EU brings with it constraints on

EVERYTHING

from

EMPLOYMENT LAW

to FAMILY POLICY

all determined through distant, centralised processes we hardly understand,

LET ALONE CONTROL.

You may say: Well, that's government for you-it always involves

COMPROMISE.

Indeed it does, but at least in a democracy, the compromises are clear and transparent and can be argued over and influenced by the people who are affected by them. Yet no such possibility exists in the grotesquely

UNACCOUNTABLE EU.

As I say to my American friends who don't really get

WHAT THE EU IS

'All you need to know is that it has three presidents, none of whom elected.'

The European Union was born out of lofty ideals. And for many years, it served a valuable purpose. As an expression of the liberal values of democracy and freedom, it was a beacon to the subjugated peoples of Europe-including in Communist Hungary , from where my parents fled.

[We need to interject here: We would not disagree with the points outlined above except to say that from the beginning the EU was the birth child of and the inspiration of Nazism during World War 2 and - that it was because of the very notions mentioned above that they knew they could over time by the technique of 'Gradualism' change the nature of the EU to fit their intended model of a COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-UNACCOUNTABLE-UNDEMOCRATIC-ELITIST EUROPEAN UNION which Mr Steve Hilton has so accurately and painstakingly uncovered.

What we find so difficult to understand is why after the uncovering in 2001 under the 30 year rule at the Records Office at Kew of foreign office documents since 1970 clearly showing the efforts to hide the truth of the real intention of the EU PROJECT that the public were not more pro-active as some notable authors such as Christopher Booker who exposed the TRUTH but were unable to get the British public to question where everything was leading. We ourselves since 2003 have shown many such documents on our website exposing the Conspiracy because that is what it is otherwise how can one explain how so little was done by the FREE PRESS to expose the TRUTH until only recent times? It has taken an important insider such as Steve  Hilton the close confident at No 10 of David Cameron to put some credence to the known facts which have been common knowledge for decades.  We thank Mr Hilton for his brave and timely exposure of the BEAST of BRUSSELS and for giving the PEOPLE the means to escape from the even closer encirclement planned for them which they can prevent by voting to

LEAVE THE EU

ON

JUNE 23-2016]

*

 ARTICLE CONTINUED

But , today, the EU has become the institutional manifestation of almost everything I argue against in my book,

More Human

There, I set out my view that the systems and the structures we have designed to run the modern world have become

TOO BIG

BUREAUCRATIC

and

DISTANT

from the

HUMAN SCALE.

And I make my case for what is in many ways a classical liberal reform agenda: I am a pro-market, pro-enterprise, pro-trade, pro-putting power in

PEOPLE'S HANDS.

THE EU DOES THE OPPOSITE

It is anti-market, stifling innovation and competition with its

STATISM

CORPORATISM

BUREAUCRACY

It is anti-enterprise, acting

IN THE INTERESTS OF BIG BUSINESSES

that have corruptly captured the

THE LEVERS OF POWER

IN

BRUSSELS

through their

SHAMELESS LOBBYING

and

INSIDER DEAL-MAKING,

enabling a gradual takeover of

OUR COUNTRY.

 

The European Union  is anti-trade

locking developing countries out of world markets with its evil

COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY

 that featherbeds, French farmers while keeping African farmers trapped in

POVERTY and DESPAIR

And I don't think the EU's most fervent supporters would ever claim that it

'PUTS POWER IN PEOPLE'S HANDS'

The whole point of the EU is to take power

OUT

of people's hands' in pursuit of a greater good.

THE TROUBLE IS, ITS NOT GOOD ENOUGH.

*

They are so arrogant and dismissive of our modest demands

*

These are issues that a reformed EU might address. I could certainly live with an imperfect EU that nevertheless showed some willing-ness towards dispersing, rather than centralising power.

But it is perfectly obvious to everyone, including  Mr Cameron, that no such reorientation

WILL EVER BE COUNTENANCED.

 The arrogant and dismissive treatment of Britain's relatively modest demands in the 2015/2016 negotiations shows that the EU is just NOT INTERESTED in anything OTHER THAN SUPERFICIAL CHANGE.

You might as well hope for Vladimir Putin to embrace liberal democracy. Of course, the EU is perfectly entitled to such a disposition.

BUT IT IS WELL TO BE CLEAR ABOUT IT>

And so one way of thinking about this

REFERENDUM

is that the choice is actually not between

STAYING and LEAVING- BUT between LEAVING and JOINING a NEW EU.

Because the EU after a BRITISH VOTE to STAY would be a different creature from the one we have today. It would be  the EU unleashed, freed from the constraints of having to placate the pesky BRITISH with its endless complaining and THREATS to LEAVE.

Once they know we will never leave, all our leverage

WILL BE GONE. Look how they treated a British Prime Minister armed with the threat of BREXIT. Can you imagine how they would treat a future PM

WITHOUT SUCH A POWERFUL CARD TO PLAY?

And remember that this is for the LONG TERM. Even if you think Cameron's deal will protect us from the worst excesses of the EU, the fact is that he will be in office for ONLY FOUR YEARS AT MOST.

[OR BE OUSTED IN  WEEKS OR MONTHS FOR THE DISSEMBLER AND OPPORTUNIST HE IS, AFTER THE RESULT OF THE REFERENDUM, ON JUNE 23-2016.

WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN 14 YEARS' TIME OR 24?

Who knows what kind of a Prime Minister we will have, and whether he or she will GIVE UP EVERYTHING .

David Cameron negotiated-just like Tony Blair gave up the OPT-OUT from the SOCIAL CHARTER negotiated by John Major (a capitulation which meant that, under the system of QMV-qualified majority voting, Britain could subsequently be overturned ruled by other European countries on issues such as

WORKING CONDITIONS

and

HEALTH and SAFETY.)

The one thing we can be certain of- because it's based not on speculation or scaremongering but on what has happened in the past-is that the EU will only ever move in one direction:

MORE CENTRALISATION

MORE BUREAUCRACY

MORE POWER SHIFTING FURTHER FROM PEOPLE'S HANDS.

From that clarity should come an informed decision

TO LEAVE.

To regain control over our country's destiny so that a democratically elected government in Britain is FREE to carry out its MANDATE, whether that's

LEFT, RIGHT or CENTRE.

For me, it would mean economic and employment policy that makes Britain the best place in the world to start and grow a business, ; family policy that makes Britain the best place in the world to bring up children; competition, planning and government reform that finally allows us to prioritise the small, the local, the inefficient', the beautiful, THE HUMAN.

Others would have a different agenda. But don't you see, if a political party wins the votes then that partyshould be allowed to make it happen.

That's what it's all about. That's why I think

WE SHOULD LEAVE.

People ask: what about the economy, and access to Europe's Single Market? Would we end up like NORWAY? Or SWITZERLAND.?

NO

We're bigger than that; better Our independent relationship with the EU, but the last time I checked. General Motors had no problem selling cars there. Or Heinz, ketchup. Or Starbucks, coffee.

It's a particular vanity of politicians to believe that all good things in the world come from their actions. The economic reality is that our success in trade depends far more on fundamental factors such as comparative advantage-whether we are designing and making things others want to buy-than on politicians' BUREAUCRATIC SCHEMES.

But the bottom line on the economic argument is that no one really knows. It's clearly ridiculous to claim that  that it's settled in either direction; there are risks

WHATEVER WE DO.

The real choice is not economic security or economic risk, but what kind of government will equip us best to cope with a risky  fast-changing world.?

I think, on balance, that the answer to that question is a government THAT WE CONTROL

That can move at a pace we set, rather than the inevitably sclerotic speed a

A COMMITTEE OF 28 COUNTRIES, WITH A VASTLY DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES.

Then we're told that the EU is

VITAL FOR OUR SECURITY

They claim that the EU is vital for our security is just astonishing.

 Really? I was pretty amazed when I first heard this point being made. The idea that a British Prime Minister can't protect Britain properly without the EU is frankly astonishing, and , if true, rather alarming.

BUT ,OF COURSE, IT'S NOT TRUE.

YES, in a complex world of global threats, we need security co-operation with other countries-like what happens in NATO. Forgive me if I've missed something, but I wasn't aware that

THIS REFERENDUM IS ABOUT LEAVING NATO.

And our closest security partner is the U.S. We manage to stand shoulder to shoulder with them in fighting terrorism and other threats without being locked in a supra-national institutional embrace. We co-operate as TWO COUNTRIES.

THAT'S WHAT WE WOULD DO IF WE LEFT THE EU.

But perhaps the most important argument for leaving the EU

 is to look at the people who are wheeled out to persuade us to STAY; figures like the

International Monetary Fund boss Christine Lagarde,

Bank of England Governor Mark Carney,

advertising giant Sir Martin Sorrell,

as well as the

 CBI -Confederation of British Industry. and all the other

ESTABLISHMENT STOOGES.

THEY WANT US TO STAY IN THE EU

BECAUSE THEIR WHOLE WORLD

 DEPENDS ON IT.

Their lifestyle of summit meetings and first-class flights and five star hotels; their flitting and floating from New York to Brussels to Beijing, serving the  of the technocratic elite-

THE BANKERS

BUREAUCRATS

AND

ACCOUNTANTS

who run the modern world and who, regardless of which government in power in which country, push the same dogma of

GLOBALISATION

PRIVATISATION

AND

CENTRALISATION.

DON'T GET ME WRONG:

I'm a fan of GLOBAL TRADE and a champion of the PRIVATE SECTOR.

BUT

when those good things are accompanied by

CENTRALISATION

the result is an  unhealthy concentration of

ECONOMIC and POLITICAL POWER

that is fundamentally hostile to my belief in

INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM

AND

SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

and my confidence in human nature and the good that will come when

INDIVIDUALS-FAMILIES and NEIGHBOURHOODS

WORK TOGETHER.

without a far-away administrator's

MASTER PLAN.

A decision to leave the EU is not without risk, but I believe it is the ideal and idealistic choice for our times.

TAKING BACK POWER

 FROM

 ARROGANT, UNACCOUNTABLE, HUBRISTIC ELITES

PUTTING IT WERE IT BELONGS

IN

PEOPLE'S HANDS.

 

THIS is an adopted extract from a new revised paperback edition of More Human: Designing A World Where People Come First, by Steve Hilton, to be published on Thursday by  WH Allen, £8.99 Steve Hilton 2016.

Full article

 

[This is one of the most important expose on the EU we have ever encountered since we entered the political arena in 1997 in order to divulge the criminal and treasonable behaviour of politicians and others who belied the truth of the purpose and intention of the EU. ]

 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

Monday, May 23,2016

CASE FOR BREXIT BY A MAN WHO REALLY KNOWS

Since the start of the referendum campaign, Remain supporters-led by the Prime Minister- have tried to portray those who want to leave the EU as dishonest, deluded, or downright mad.

Last week for example, Chancellor George Osborne sneeringly described Brexit supporters as a bunch of conspiracy theorists who believe he and Mr Cameron are part of a global stitch-up' aimed art terrifying British voters into sticking with Brussels.

'The next thing you know they will be accusing us of faking the moon landings, kidnapping Shergar , and covering up the existence of the Loch Ness Monster,' he said. All highly amusing of course, but will they use the same language about the latest recruit to the

 LEAVE CAMP?

Steve Hilton, Mr Cameron's closest friend in politics, godfather to one of his children, his former strategy chief and man who persuaded him to stand as party leader declares in today's Mail the the EU has been  and that Britain can 'corruptly captured' by a self-serving ELITE! and that BRITAIN can ONLY THRIVE by being OUTSIDE IT.

In a shattering blow to his former boss, Mr Hilton says the

UK is 'UNGOVERNABLE'

as a

DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY

inside the

EU'

which has become 'so complicated ,so secretive, so impenetrable that it's way beyond the ability of any  British Government to make it work to our advantage'.

Unlike some of the superannuated  former Tory advisers wheeled out by Remain, Mr Hilton was until recently at

THE VERY HEART OF GOVERNMENT.

Known as Mr Cameron's guru', he is the ultimate

DOWNING STREET INSIDER.

So he has seen with his own eyes how Brussels stifles

ENTERPRISE-

TRADE

COMPETITION

He describes how it works for big business and against

DEMOCRACY

and concludes

IT WILL NEVER REFORM.

 

Doesn't this searingly honest analysis put the scaremongering of the  Remain camp to shame? For all their apocalypic warnings of economic meltdown and mass unemployment, they have still not put forward a positive case for staying in the EU

By contrast, here is Mr Hilton's positive case for

GETTING OUT

'I believe it is [about] taking back power from

ARROGANT

UNACCOUNTABLE,

HUBRISTIC ELITES

and putting it where it belongs-

IN PEOPLES HANDS.'

Does that sound deluded, or just

DEMOCRATIC.

*

Full article.

 

*

*News for DAILY MAIL-HOW THE EU MAKES BRITAIN IMPOSSIBLE TO GOVERN

*

Why we MUST quit the EU, by David Cameron's guru Steve Hilton

*

 

H.F.790

 

 

MAY 25-2016

 

H.F.794

 

LETTER from Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, to

 Edward Heath,

prior to the acceptance by Parliament of the “Treaty of Rome

 

My dear Ted,

 

You wrote to me on 30th November, [1970] - about the constitutional implications of our [The UK] becoming a party to the “Treaty of Rome”. I have now had an opportunity of considering what you say in your letter and have studied the memoranda you sent me I agree with you that there are IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES INVOLVED.

 

I have no doubt that if we do sign the TREATY, we shall suffer some LOSS of SOVEREIGNTY, but before attempting to define or evaluate the loss I wish to make one general observation.

 

 At the end of the day, the ISSUE is

Whether or NOT to join the [So-called]

 EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

 

- must be decided on broad political grounds and if it appears from what follows in

this letter that I find the constitutional objections serious that does mean that I consider them conclusive [final!]

 

I do however, think it important that we should appreciate clearly from the outset exactly WHAT, from the CONSTITUTIONAL point of view, is involved if we sign the treaty, and it is with that consideration in mind that I have addressed myself to the questions you have raised.

 

Adherence to the Treaty of Rome would in my opinion, would AFFECT our SOVEREIGNTY in three ways:-

 

PARLIAMENT would be required to surrender some of its functions to the ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

The CROWN would be called ON to TRANSFER part of its TREATY-MAKING power to those ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

OUR COURTS OF LAW would sacrifice some degree of INDEPENDENCE by becoming subordinate in certain respects to the EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.

 

The POSITION of PARLIAMENT.

 

It is clear that the memorandum prepared by your Legal advisers that the Council of Ministers could eventually (after the system of qualified majority voting had come into force) make regulations which would be binding on us even against our wishes, and would in fact become for us part of the LAW of the LAND.

 

THERE ARE TWO WAYS IN WHICH THIS REQUIREMENT OF THE TREATY COULD IN PRACTICE BE IMPLEMENTED.

 

Parliament could legislate ad hoc on each occasion that the Council make regulations requiring action by us. The difficulty would be that, since Parliament can bind neither bind itself nor its successors, we could only comply with the obligations under the TREATY if PARLIAMENT abandoned its RIGHT of passing independent judgment on the legislative proposals put before it.

 

A parallel is the CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION whereby PARLIAMENT passes the British North American Bills without question at the request of the PARLIAMENT of CANADA; in this respect PARLIAMENT here has substance if not in form, abdicated its SOVEREIGN position, and it would have pro tanto [for so much] , to do the same for the [EUROPEAN] COMMUNITY.

 

 It would in theory be possible for parliament to enact at the outset legislation which would give automatic force of law to any existing or future [EU] regulations made by the appropriate organs of the Community.  For Parliament to do this would go far beyond the most extensive delegation of -----

I do not think there is any likelihood of this being acceptable to the House of Commons. Which ever course were adopted, Parliament would retain in theory the liberty to repeal the relevant Act or Acts [Of the EU Treaty] but I would agree with you that we must act on the assumption that entry into the [EU] Community would be irrevocable; we should therefore to accept a position where Parliament had no more power to repeal its own enactments than it has in practice to abrogate the Statute of Westminster. 

 

In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the [EU] Council, or other appropriate organ of the [EU] Community, its substantive powers of legislating over a whole of a very important field.

 

Treaty –Making POWERS.

 

The proposition that every treaty entered into by the United Kingdom does to some extent fetter our freedom of action is plainly TRUE.  Some treaties such as GATT and O.E.E.C restrict severely our liberty to make agreements with third parties and I should not regard it as detrimental to our sovereign that, by signing the TREATY of ROME, we undertook not to make tariff or trade agreements without the Council’s approval.

 

BUT to transfer to the Council or the [EU] Commission the power to make such treaties on our behalf, and even against our will, is an entirely different proposition.

 

There seems to me to be a clear distinction between the exercise of sovereignty involved in the conscious acceptance by us of obligations under treaty-making powers and the total or partial surrender of sovereignty involved in our cession of these powers to some other body.

 

To confer a sovereign state’s treaty-making powers on an international organisation is the first step on the road which leads by way of confederation to the fully FEDERAL STATE.

 

I do not suggest that what is involved would necessarily carry us very far in this direction, but it would be a most significant step and one for which there is no precedent in our case.  Moreover, a further surrender of sovereignty of parliamentary supremacy would necessarily be involved as you know, although the treaty-making power is vested in the CROWN.

 

 

Parliamentary sanction is required for any treaty which involves a change in the law or the imposition of taxation (to take two examples), and we cannot ratify such a treaty unless Parliament consents. But if binding treaties are to be entered into on our behalf, Parliament must surrender this function and either resign itself to becoming a rubber stamp or give the Community, in effect, the power to amend our domestic laws.

 

Independence of the Courts.

 

There is no precedent for our final appellate tribunal being required to refer questions of law (even in a limited field) to another Court and as I assume to be the implication of “refer” to accept that Court’s decision.

 

You will remember that when a similar proposal was considered in connection with the Council of Europe we felt strong objection to it. I have no doubt that the whole of the legal profession in this country would share my dislike for such a proposal which must inevitably detract from the INDEPENDENCE and AUTHORITY of OUR COURTS.

 

 

Of these three objections, the first two are by far the more important.  I must emphasise that in my view the SURRENDERS of SOVEREIGNTY involved are SERIOUS ONES, and I think that as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade PARLIAMENT or the PUBLIC to accept them.

 [Details at foot of page of information released from the Public Record Office at Kew under the 30 year rule revealing the LIES and DECEIT used by the Foreign Office to trick the people in 1972 and yet again in 1975. ]

I am sure that it would be a great mistake to under-estimate the force of objections to them.  But these objections ought to be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this stage, those who are opposed to the whole idea of our joining the [EU] Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging effect later on.  Having said this, I would emphasis once again that, although these CONSTITUTIONAL considerations must be given their full weight when we come to balance the arguments on either side, I do not for one moment wish to convey the impression that they must necessarily tip the scale.  In the long run we shall have to decide whether economic factors require us to make

SACRIFICES of SOVEREIGNTY:

My concern is to ensure that we should see exactly what it is that we are called on to sacrifice, and how serious our loss would be.

 

Yours ever,      David.

 

*          *

 

[There are many hundreds of essays on the subject of constitutional  matters on our bulletin board which give the background to the CONSPIRACY of the pro-European lobby at the time and since who felt no compunction in telling LIES-LIES and more LIES.  Some of those politicians who concealed and the TRUTH and fostered the DECEIT are still with us today in 2006. –Though some have now realised how wrong they were to turn a blind eye to the blatant half-truths and downright lies in order to get the Bill through Parliament by only 8 votes. – to remind you again that many more details by INDEPENDENT sources on our bulletin board].

 

*          *          *

 

 [Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets.]

SEPTEMBER/06

*

H.F.766
 
 
TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
 
By
 
NORRIS McWHIRTER

A patriot and truth seeker.

 

HE ARGUED THAT:
 
By its nature, the duty of allegiance is in law "unalienable and perpetual". This language, from Foster`s Crown Cases (1743-1761), was quoted with approval at the trial of Sir Roger Casement in 1917. Casement had been arrested near Tralee, County Kerry, in1916, having been landed from a German U-boat to foment Irish defection. Allegiance was similarly defined at the capital trial of the supercilious Nazi wartime broadcaster, William ' Lord Haw-Haw' Joyce (1906-1946)
 
For the purposes of allegiance, foreign states are deemed either to be "in actual hostility", as in the case of Argentina in 1982,or "in amity", as in the case at present of the other European Union states. However, the condition of hostility or amity in no way disposes of the essential exclusiveness of perpetual and unalienable allegiance. No man can serve two sovereigns. When, therefore the late Sir John Fiennes (1911-1996) cunningly drafted the European Communities Bill, in 1972, and when on 17 October 1972, his unamended Bill became an Act subordinating British law to European law, there was wrought nothing less than the greatest constitutional revolution in Parliament's seven and a half centuries of existence. It was furthermore done without even a schedule of consequential repeals.
 
The politicians of the day, many of them unwittingly, voted to launch the nation on a path of "ever closer[ European] union" which could only lead to the United Kingdom becoming a subordinate offshore province of the United States of Europe. Those who engineered Britain's adherence to the
 
Treaties of Rome and of Maastricht, probably never even had Section 3 of thee Treason Felony Act 1848 drawn to their attention. In it , condemnation is incurred:
"If any person whatsoever shall, within the United Kingdom or without, compass, imagine, invent, devise or intend to deprive or dispose our most gracious Lady the Queen. . . from the style, honour, or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom. . ."
 
Indicted and convicted offenders against this unrepealed law are subject to imprisonment "for the term of his or her natural life". Yet not a finger was lifted even when, on 7 February 1992, two Privy Counsellors, Douglas Hurd and Francis Maude, signed the Maastricht Treaty which , at a stroke, brought our Monarch under suzerainty of the European Union.
 
The Queen was thereby rendered subject to past and future judgments of the Court of the European Communities in Luxembourg, from which there is no appeal and which was thereby confirmed in authority over her Courts in which she was previously arraignable.
 
Article 8 of the Treaty of Maastricht which imposed all-embracing compulsory European citizenship on the Queen and all her United Kingdom subjects, without their express consent, did so " subject to the duties imposed thereby". These duties are undefined and are thus both unknown and unknowable. One of them is however perhaps discernable since the Maastricht Treaty left unamended Article 192 of the Treaty of Rome. This reads:
 
"Decisions of the Council or of the Commission which impose a pecuniary obligation on persons other than states shall be enforceable."
 
Since "pecuniary obligations" clearly includes taxation, and "perhaps other than states" must include the new recipients of compulsory European citizenship, we have here the legal authorization of a reserve power to levy new taxation from Brussels on each and every citizen of the 15 EU countries.
 
Of al the magical and mysterious processes involved in Britain's political integration with Europe, initiated by Macmillan and engineered by Heath from 31 July 1961 to17 October 1972, none is more remarkable than the absence of a single measure repealing any part of any of the four great Constitutional Statutes - Magna Carta of Edward 1, the Petition of Right(1627), the Bill of Rights (1688 ) and the Act of Settlement (1700). Perhaps Sir John Fiennes relied upon the doctrine of implied repeal, but certainly the electorate would have regarded express repeal as offending against the principle that nothing but their own demerit can deprive natural born subjects of their peculiar privileges, called their birthright, as enshrined in these hitherto durable constitutional bulwarks.
 
In Vauxhall Estates v. Liverpool Corporation 1932, it was established in law that "no Parliament may bind its successors" However, Article Q of the timeless Maastricht Treaty said that the Treaty "is concluded for an unlimited period" and it conveyed no right or mechanism for secession. It is nonetheless arguable that what one Parliament has done , that same or some succeeding Parliament can undo. In Blackburn v.Attorney General 1983, Lord Justice Megarry, in his judgment declared:
 
"As a matter of law, the Courts of England recognize Parliament as being omnipotent in all save the power to destroy its omnipotence."
 
From the European Court of Luxembourg in 1972, the very year in which Parliament, at least temporarily, voted away its sovereignty in such large measure, came an unappealable judgment on the Treaty of Rome:
 
"The treaty entails a definitive limitation of the sovereign rights of member states against which no provisions of municipal law whatever their nature can be involved."
 
It was in reference to this Court that Sir Patrick Neill QC, former Warden of All Soul`s College, Oxford, coined the maxim; " A court with a mission is a menace; a supreme Court with a mission is a tyranny." The phrase was incorporated into the recent Euro-sceptic speech by the Home Secretary. (1996)
 
Those who see the erosion of British self -government (in defence of the 1,250,000 Britons died in the first half of this century) as emanating from the single Oxford college of Balliol, will be dubbed ' conspiracy theorists'. But the precise legal definition of a conspiracy is that it is an agreement between two or more people, unrelated in marriage, to behave in a manner that will automatically constitute an offence by at least one of them, though mens rea (guilty mind) is required by at least two co-conspirators. There is nothing theoretical about the way in which the Privy Counsellor's oath, which enjoined two Balliol educated Prime Ministers, Macmillan and Heath. And the first British President of the European Commission in Brussels (Lord Jenkins of Hillhead, also a Balliol man!):
 
"To bear faith bear faith and allegiance to the Crown and to defend its jurisdiction and powers against all foreign . . . persons . . . or states."
 
has been breached by these men.
 
What is further demoralizing is that no less than six subsequent Privy Counsellor's, following the precedent of Lord Jenkins in 1975, have each made a solemn declaration before the Luxembourg Court as European Commissioners:
 
"To perform my duties in complete independence in the general interest of the communities; in carrying out my duties".
 
This conflict of solemn undertaking can only mildly be described as duplicitous.
 
Unconstitutionality in the headlong dash to create the new European Super state is hardly confined to Britain. The Dutch draftsmen of the Maastricht Treaty included a stipulation in Article R that each and every country must ratify it "according to its own constitution requirements". Having got it ` wrong' the first time, Denmark's second referendum raised several studiously unanswered constitutional questions . No case was , however, more stark than the case of Germany herself. She has a unique Federal Constitutional Court, the Bundesverfassungsgericht, with nine judges sitting in Karksruhe to guard their Constitution.
The creation of the European Union and Britain's continued self-governance was dependent on the verdict of this Court for , on 11 October 1993 , Germany's instrument of ratification was still undeposited in Rome. Without this twelfth and last document (the other 11 EU countries having ratified the Maastricht Treaty) the EU could not come into being. It transpired however that the terms approved by this supreme German national Court to permit ratification, were miles wide of the terms of the Treaty already signed by the German Government and the eleven other nations.
For instance, the Court declared:
 
"Article F does not empower the (European) Union to procure the financial means or other means it deems necessary to fulfill its purposes."
 
Yet that is precisely what Article F does say in the following words:
 
" The Union shall provide itself with the resources necessary to attain its objectives and carry out its policies."

 
Following a question in the House of Lords, Baroness Chalker, Minister of State in the Foreign Office, confirmed that indeed the European Union "can obtain financial resources to attain the Union's objectives."
 
In another area the Karksruhe Court calmly took for Germany an negotiated opt-out from the European Monetary Union (EMU) - something for which both Denmark and the United Kingdom had to negotiate by special protocol prior to signing. Both the Governors of the Bank of England and the Danish Central Bank have confirmed that there was and is no opt-out provision for Germany in the Treaty. The fact that the terms and conditions of the Maastricht Treaty, as approved by their Constitutional Court, simply do not exist. Hence Germany's rapid ratification was in clear breach of Article R of the Treaty itself. Since its ratification was invalid, the Maastricht Treaty itself has no proper legal standing.
 
Though earlier this year (1996) our Foreign Office made a legal assessment of the Treaty, it has not publicly disclosed the obvious and only conclusion. Perhaps we are waiting either until the going gets rougher or some wealthily corporation litigates to prove that some swingeing Brussels penalty is in fact unenforceable.
 
No sovereign state can survive without the concepts of allegiance and of breaches of allegiance being treasonable.
 
Can a European Super state survive without such internal defences? The answer must assuredly be that where solidarity is more, rather than less, fragile and tenuous, the as yet unfamiliar concept of Euro-treason will eventually be vigorously advanced. There does not appear to be any ready instrument for enforcement at the moment (1996) it is not however hard to predict that the draconian powers of the Luxembourg Court will soon bring the concept of Euro-treason into focus. We are told that the Europol is intended for apprehending cross-border criminals within the Union. But the beef crisis, the United Kingdom was about to acquiesce in its creation. Perhaps a fortuitous blow for freedom has been struck and magazine articles such as this will be safe from a Europol for a little longer.
Bully for beef!
 

 
From The Freedom Association
www.tfa.net
 *  *  *

 

 

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

 

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.

 

H.F.730

IN OTHER WORDS THE SCIENCE OF GRADUALISATION-A STEP BY STEP TRANSFER OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER OF ENGLAND'S

 MAGNA CARTA! AND PETITION OF RIGHT!

IN ORDER TO HIDE THE HEINESS BETRAYAL

OF THE PEOPLE

BY

QUEEN

-LORDS  AND COMMONS.

 

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

 

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence.

 

The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

 

Finally we call on the words of a great Prime Minister who was a christian JEW.

 

' The press is not only free, it is  powerful.  That power is ours.  It is the proudest that man can enjoy.  It was not granted by monarchs; it was not gained for us by aristocracies;  but it sprang from the people, and , with an immortal instinct it has always worked for the people.'

 

Benjamin Disraeli (1804-81)

 

More...

 

 

 

OLD HOME

Est. 1994-Policies-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links -

IMMIGRATION

 Archive-Top Topics and Stats

     

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

FREEDOM CORNER

WORLD AFFAIRS

     

TREASON!

Part 1-Preface

 

Part 2-The Strange Case Of Werner Report

 

Part 3-Mr Macmillan and 1961

 

Part 4-Mr Heath and 1970

 

 NEWFEBPART 1-2-3-(Previous Month)NEWFEBPART 4-5-

 NEWJANPART 1-2-3-(PREVIOUS MONTH)NEWJANPART 4-5-

VOTE LEAVE

FOR

 FREEDOM

 WITH A

FIRM FUTURE FOR

 ENGLAND

 

 THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

 

 

 

TOP OF PAGE