VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

 
 
 
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN

 

 

 

 

 

Established 1994-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-Top Topics and Stats

*HOME-PT 2

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ & PAGE FOUR

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

 
RON PAUL_THE LIBERTY PARTY 9-11+(1) GLOBALWARMING SCAM USA IRAQ/AFGHAN LONDON BOMBINGS COMMON PURPOSE CONSPIRACY CENTRAL BANKS  +(1)
IMMIGRATION ARCHIVE

HOME

 MAIN BULLETINS E U  ENGLAND +(1) BILDERBERGERS+(1) ILLUMINATI +(1)-(1)

GLOBALIZATION

NEW WORLD ORDER +(1)
 
1)U.S. Concentration Camps

2)DEC-2011- MADE-READY

3) PLANS

1)

FEMA

2)

1)Protocols

of

ZION

 

2)

ZIONISM

 

CITY

OF

LONDON

 

 A STATE WITHIN ENGLAND

+(2)

 Dr.

John

Coleman

WHO OWNS

THE FED

 

POWER

OF 1)HAARP FOR GOOD   2)EVIL

Mind Control Henry Makow 1)Chemtrails

2)CREATED

C3)

1)

PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS

 

2)

(1)

War

is a Racket

 

(2)

   
 
ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 
 

 

BBC Account of History obscured by the partial Truth – Part 1

 

BBC2 – Sat 6th March 2004

‘The Battle for Britain’s soul

Upheavals in the 17th century’

 

The dogmatic assertions that it was Only a Religious War are contradicted by History. It was a clever manoeuvre to hide the full significance of the momentous events in the progress of Democracy in the 17th century, which bore fruit in the 19th century.

 

In order to show the blatant attempt to alter history we will use the words of impartial observers of the past to show the TRUE picture of the effects of the changes taking place over three hundred years ago.

 

The Essentials of Democracy

 

By

 

A D. Lindsay, LL.D.

Master of Balliol College, Oxford.

 

(1930)

 

 

The following extracts are from lectures given by Master A D Lindsay on the William J. Cooper Foundation at Swarthmore College, Pennsylvania, in January 1929

*

[At this time in our Country’s history in the opening of the new Millennium when many people are concerned about what one would now term Democracy and whether we have lost the true meaning as expressed in English terms in the past. In the 1930’s there was much debate on the subject as the fear of another war were beginning to be voiced by some, though the majority would not accept the possibility, after the carnage of the Great War of 1914-18].

 

*          *

 

‘We are at present time passing through a certain disillusionment about democracy. Before the war

(1914-1918) It could almost be taken for granted that democracy of some kind or other was the only possible government for the modern civilised country.

 

The surviving non-democratic elements in the modern state like Germany were felt to be survivals, alien to the spirit of the age and certain in course of time to disappear. Not that we thought our previous democracies perfect.

 

We found in them a great deal to grumble at.  But our grumblings were usually to the effect that our democratic governments are not democratic enough. Socialism for example – that one great school of thought which systematically criticized existing democratic governments, did it on the ground that oligarchically governed industry made democratic politics a sham, made a modern industrial society a house divided against itself; and its remedy was and is the democratisation of industry – not less democracy but more….

 

Men feel disillusionment about political democracy, I believe for reasons of the same kind. Just consider the prodigious achievement of democracy in the United states (1930) – how it has managed to give orderly and established government to a continent – to an enormous population of all nations and languages – to a society known to the Fathers of the Constitution.

 

But this prodigious success has been purchased at a price – the transformation of Democracy into something very different from any thing Jefferson and Lincoln ever dreamed of.  And as Democracy adjusts itself clumsily and slowly and inadequately to its new tasks, its failures to meet new opportunities it has itself created are more evident than its success in making them.

 

It is not simply that the new forms of Democracy takes on are disappointing to those who knew the old. The position is more serious. The new tasks thrust on successful democracy are really in danger of breaking it down Expert manipulation of men in the mass, drilled and disciplined parties, and all other phenomena of modern large-scale democracies are not democracy at all.

 

Our disappointment with modern political democracy is, (as in 1930) I repeat, not the result simply of a comparison between what exists now and what we remember existing in an earlier or simpler time, or what our parents or grandparents have told us.

 

The disillusionment comes from a contrast in the present. We are all of us members of one or more of the innumerable smaller societies, which are such a feature of modern social life, particularly of American and English social life. We know there what thoroughly satisfactory and obvious and altogether to be taken for granted a form of government democracy can be, and we are worried and disappointed because political democracy falls so far short of the experienced ideal.

 

Is this appeal to the simple, familiar, small society a mistake? Is this feeling of disillusionment unnecessary?

 

Does it arise from our contrasting a nation or world –wide society with what it cannot and never was intended to be like?  That the appeal from the state to the smaller circles of personal relationship is often misleading is plain enough.

 

The history of the doctrine of natural rights – of the conception of human brotherhood, makes that clear.

 

 But the persistency of such appeals in the history of politics is witness of how often men know that large organizations and machinery tend to become

an end in themselves, and have by such appeals to be reminded of the simple human ends they are intended to serve.

 

I propose therefore to go back to the beginnings of modern democracy as it was conceived in the seventeenth century and formulated by men who had vivid experience of the super-eminent satisfactoriness of simple democratic government in the self-governing congregation, and therefore demanded that the state should be organised on the same model.

 

There is this special reason for my going back to the seventeenth century experience when lecturing to an American audience. It is a bold task for an Englishman to talk about Democracy to citizens of the United States.  English and American Democracy are in many ways so subtly different: they rest on such different assumptions and have developed in such different ways that it is very hard for a man who is familiar with the other without misunderstanding.

 

If I plunged at once into a discussion of modern conditions you might be tempted to assume that I coming from England necessarily do not know really what Democracy means: and you might be affronted if you seemed, from some of my language, to discover that I thought that it was you as Americans who suffered from that ignorance.

 

But in the seventeenth-century Puritan democrats in America and in England have a common ground examining afresh the rock out of which we are both hewn. 

 

This way of beginning our discussion should have the great advantage of reminding us of the part played in the development of democracy, and still played in its working by the democratically governed religious organizations. On the practical importance of this for the present day (1930) I hope to have something to say in a later lecture. But it will help us to have it in mind from the start.

 

By a good fortune we happen to possess a first hand account – taken down in short-hand of the period – of a memorable debate on the principles of democratic government and their practical application to England, held between the representatives of the  [Cromwell’s] Army on the one hand, and two men who were more than any others really responsible for the government of England, Cromwell and Ireton, on the other.

 

The debate was held at the grand council of officers at Putney, the 25th October, 1647, to consider a remonstrance from the army called ‘ The case of the army truly stated, together with the mishaps and dangers which are imminent and some suitable remedies, and humbly proposed by the agents of the five regiments of horse to the respective regiments and the whole army.’

 

The officers discussed it with five agents who are named – one of them with the appropriate name of Mr Wildman, and four soldiers. Some of the most striking remarks are made by one of the latter who is referred to simply as Buffcoat – as might be ‘Steel Helmet’ or ‘Unknown Soldier’.

 The Council of officers were not all in agreement with Cromwell and Ireton. The case for the army is maintained by Colonel Rainboro, one of the most prominent of the Levellers. For convenience sake therefore I shall refer to those who voice the views of the delegates from the army as the Levellers.

 The debate was taken down in shorthand by a William Clarke, who was at that time secretary to the Council of the Army. He was one of those who afterwards followed [General] Monk and was made Secretary of War after the Restoration. His son Dr. George Clarke, bequeathed his father’s papers in 1736 to:

Worcester College,

Oxford,

And they were edited by Professor Firth and published by the Camden society in 1891.

 The article in the case for the army round which the debate centres is the demand for manhood suffrage, and in their statements of the case for its defenders touch on the centre of the democratic principle. Ireton defends the principle that voting should be based on property and confined to those who have a permanent stake in the country and he argues his case ably and well.

 

But all such arguments based as they are, on expediency and experience are swept aside by the passionate vision of the others.

Really,’ says Colonel Rainboro,

‘I think the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the richest he.’

 

That seems to me the authentic note of democracy. The poorest has his own life to live, not to be managed or drilled or used by other people. His life is his and he has to live it. None can divest him of the responsibility. However different men may be in wealth or ability or learning, whether clever or stupid, good or bad, living their life is their concern and their responsibility.

 That is for those Puritans as for all true democrats the real meaning of human equality.’

 Responsibility for one's own life is something possessed by or enjoined on us all.  Our equality in that responsibility is of such preponderating importance that beside it all our other differences, manifest and undeniable as they may be, are neither here or there.  That is not a scientific nor a common-sense doctrine.

IT IS A RELIGIOUS and MORAL PRINCIPLE

It is the translation into non-theological language of the spiritual priesthood of all believers. men who could say such things like that have gone deep into the heart of things.

 

"The rights of Individuals and the justice due to them are as dear and precious as those of States; Indeed the latter are founded on the former, and the great end and object of them must be to secure and support the rights of Individuals, or else vain is government’’  - Cushing, in Conway, Life of Paine, i. 217

 

 

*          *          *

 The greater part of the above article was in a bulletin from

MARCH- 2004

 

To Be Continued –in Part 2

[TO FOLLOW]

[With the interest in the situation in CHINA in April -2008 we shall return to the 'Essentials of Democracy' to examine large-scale government of that interpretation of DEMOCRACY which regards its essence as the assent of the governed to the acts of government, and have seen that if left to itself it produces CAESARISM as with NEW LABOUR at the present day.]

 

*

 

 

A TREATY TOO FAR!

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

A TREATY TOO FAR!

 

 

*

13th October,2007

 

So You Want Out Of The EU

 

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British  (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

 

[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 08]

 

 

CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!

 

A BLUNT REPLY TO THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th DECEMBER ,2007.

*

 

 

TIME FOR DECISION

 

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!

*

The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of

THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA

*

The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS

*

MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

*

THANK GOD WE ELECTED A MONARCH

(by the Late -William Rees-Mogg-Independent Peer)

*

WHY WE MUST BE ALERT AND WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY

*

IF WE DESTROY OUR RIGHT OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT A WAR ON TERROR-WHO WINS?

(John Mortimer)

 

 

YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.

 

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS  QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.

OR

WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.

WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!

 

THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE

'Rights and Liberties'

of

Englishmen

Will keep by HER SACRED OATH

or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a  THEME PARK in the future

THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.

We are told on the BBC  (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT

'Stuck in the past'

Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of  our

FREEDOM and COUNTRY.

 

Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world.

THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!

 

Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC  as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's  INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by

PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.

 

If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION.

WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?

THEY ARE PRICELESS!

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED

*

 

The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST!

6 months to be EXACT!

*

 

THE EU

 

WE-AND THEM!

 

WE are to join THEM

THEY are not joining US

WE have more to LOSE

THEY have more to GAIN

WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY

THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!

*

Our Queen and the EU Constitution

*

The Spirit of England

by

Winston Churchill

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II

*

We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.

 

 As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER. 

The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.

There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'

Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the  Monarch talks  our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very  noses?

Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS  are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.

We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES  ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.

As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.

IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded  we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.

Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a

THEME PARK

*

Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION

and the need for a

REFERENDUM

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

*

 

Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.

*

 

[All words/word underlined  have a separate bulletin]

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

                                                                                                

A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

TO

ALL OUR VIEWERS.

 

WE WISH YOU ALL A

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR

IN

2008

[Since our Xmas message to you all last year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]

We Remember The Year 2006
 

The Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953

[We were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predecessor Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year  PROTECTOR of our inherited

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN

HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN

Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897

'We still leave it to the work of

Alfred the Great

 that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless police state to call itself a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

It is within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear for ALL TO SEE.

In the Netherlands a number of years ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

*

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS  QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

*

 

A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

by

Harry Beckhough

[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]

2004

*

'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'

-NOT any MORE

 

THE EU OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL PORTRAY ITSELF AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD

'Don't tell the voters-or you will ruin everything '

 

"...we have to make sure that there are no discussions taking place in the open air"

Guenter Burghardt, a former EU ambassador to the US, warning that details of the new EU diplomatic service (officially to be known as the External Action Service) should not be discussed in public before the

UK PARLIAMENT

had ratified the NEW EU TREATY

 and Ireland has held its TREATY REFERENDUM early next summer (source: EU Observer on 27th November ,2007

The EU has also stated that none of its institutions should rock the boat until the English have ratified their TREATY.

Over the next few months you will hear more than ever the wonderful benefits of the EU. Whether it is Global warming or whatever they feel shows them in a good light and when you have swallowed the bait you will not know what has hit you. They intend to show how reasonable they are and that they are there to make you happy. If you all fall for this con-trick then you will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store for

YOU!

Referendum: how Labour could still smell of roses.

and

'Money to spare'

when we leave the EU in 2008?

Open Europe says:

 

  • Build 40 brand new general hospitals each year 2007-13

or

  • Cut council tax by nearly 50 per cent

or

  • Cut the basic rate of income tax by 3p

or

Cut petrol duty by 75 per cent

or

Pay the total bill for the London Olympics in less than a year

AND MUCH MORE

Commons debate on the European Communities (Finance) Bill on Monday 19th November,2007.

REFERENDUM DAY

will be

RECOMPENSE DAY?

*

A TIME FOR EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.

*

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

July 18-2007

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

*

HOME