ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG UK.

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

Top Topics and Stats-ENGLAND FILE

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-23-1994-Official Website-June-23-2016-PART-8-9-10-11-12-13-14

 

JULY 23-FREEDOM WON-2016

 

 
 August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN.

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

 

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

 

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30year rule from the Public Record Office at Kew which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 NUCLEAR LETTER

 

Tories nuclear letter: It's civil war as Gove and Boris write ... - Daily Mail

by

Daniel Martin-Chief Political Correspondentail

It's civil war as Gove and Boris write to PM accusing him of damaging democracy with his lies over immigration.

 

Dear Dave,

This week the Office for National Statistics published migration statistics for 2015. Last year 270,000 people came to our country from the EU. Net migration overall was 184,000. That means we are adding a population the size of Oxford to the UK every year just from EU migration. This puts particular strain on public services.

We are particularly concerned about the impact of free movement in the future on public services. Class sizes will rise and waiting lists will lengthen if we don't  tackle free movement. As the Euro crisis continues, more people from Southern Europe will want to escape unemployment and austerity in their countries by coming to the UK. Their arrival will put further strain on schools and hospitals.

Last year, 77,000 jobseekers from the EU came to the UK. It's Government policy that the 'EU migrants should have a job offer before they come here.' But the EU did not agree to letting the UK implement that policy during the renegotiation of our membership.

It's not just the strain on public services which gives rise to cause for concern. We are call committed to improving wages for working people. But continued free movement for jobseekers will place considerable pressure on the wages of low paid British workers in the event of a vote to remain in the EU.  This is good for some of the multinationals funding the IN campaign. It is not good for British families struggling to make ends meet.

And the current EU approach to immigration isn't just bad for us economically, it is also bad in security and humanitarian terms.

Humanitarian

There is a direct security concern for all of us because the European Court of Justice can interfere with our ability to deport criminals and others whose presence here is not conducive to the public good. The case of Abu Hamza's daughter-in-law underlined the way EU institutions fetter our ability to deport convicted criminals.

[This refers the case of the Moroccan women, who has a British son, whose fight against deportation was boasted in February by the ECJ's advocate general's opinion that EU law means the UK cannot automatically deport her simply  because she has a criminal record unless she is deemed to pose  a 'serious' threat to society.]

Perhaps most worrying of all, the EU's policies are failing in humanitarian terms. The tragic scenes unfolding in the Mediterranean underline how badly the European union is handling population movements and migration pressures. People smugglers and organised criminals are exploiting this situation and the EU is failing to tackle this trade in human misery.

If we remain in the EU the situation is only likely to get worse. The European court of Justice can use the Charter of Fundamental Rights to overturn decisions of elected politicians on asylum policy. It is  now in charge of how we implement the crucial 1951 UN Convention on Refugees,. WE need a new approach on refugees but the EU's  institutions stand in the way.

There is also the basic lack of democratic consent for what is taking place. Voters were promised repeatedly at elections that net immigration could be cut to the tens of thousands. This promise is plainly not achievable as long as the UK is a member of the EU and the failure to keep it is corrosive of public trust in politics.

Given the public's desire for the facts ahead of the referendum, we would like you to confirm the following facts:

[A VOTE TO REMAIN]

A vote to remain is a vote to maintain permanently the EU Treaty principle of 'free movement of people'.

  A vote to remain is a vote to ensure that we must admit economic migrants from the EU, whether or not they have a job offer.

A vote to remain is a vote to affirm the European Court of Justice's ultimate authority over whether we can remove persons whose presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good-in this and other respects

WE DO NOT CONTROL OUR BORDERS.

Immigration

A vote to remain is a vote to leave the European Court of Justice able to use the Charter of Fundamental Rights to strike down decisions of the UK Government and Parliament about asylum and immigration policy.

A vote to remain is a vote for the UK to continue supporting the EU's failed policies to deal with the tragic crisis in the Mediterranean.

We think that it is fundamentally important that Immigration policy has democratic consent. We believe that the safer choice is to

VOTE TO LEAVE

ON

23 JUNE

 

AND ENSURE THAT THE PUBLIC CAN VOTE FOR THOSE WHO DETERMINE BRITAIN'S IMMIGRATION POLICY

We look forward to your response.

 

Yours sincerely,

Michael, Boris and Gisela

*

[We have provided CAPS and HIGHLIGHTING to EMPHASIZE some SALIENT POINTS. ]

VOTE LEAVE- [THE EU]

ON

JUNE 23-2016

TO REGAIN YOUR

FREEDOM

AND

FREE INDEPENDENT

NATION STATE.

*

'The cause of Freedom is the cause of God!'

EDMUND BURKE, 78.

*

Monday, May 30,2016

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

MAY 30-2016

H. F. 798

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 

VOTE LEAVE ON JUNE 23

AND SAVE

FREEDOM

FOR

EVERYONE

At another time in England's history when there is division within  we quote the words of Oliver Cromwell to his Second Parliament in 1658 when after 10 years of war  followed by 6 years of PEACE he made a plea of UNITY!.

'...Let us have one heart and soul; one mind to maintain the honest and just rights of this nation;-not to pretend to them, to the destruction of our Peace, to the destruction of our Nation...

[In 1658 for treason heads rolled but in 2016 after June 23 heads are to be crowned. This tells you much of the man pretending to govern the affairs of our once respected and   

 FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND]

*

Words of Lord Fauconberg:

 

The Genius of England no longer soars Sunward, world defiant, like an eagle through the storms, 'mewing her mighty youth,' as John Milton saw her do: the Genius of England, much liker a greedy Ostrich intent on provender and a whole skin mainly, stands with its other extremity Sunward; with its Ostrich-head stuck into the readiest bush, of old Church tippits, King-clocks, oe what other' sheltering Fallacy there may be , and so awaits the issue,. The issue has been slow; but it is now seen as inevitable. No Ostrich, intent on gross terrene provender, and sticking its heads into Fallacies, but will be awakened one day,- in a terrible a-posteriori manner. if not otherwise!-- AWAKE before it comes to that; gods and men bid us AWAKE! The Voices of our Fathers, with thousandfold stern monition to one and all ,

BID US AWAKE!

On the death of

 ENGLAND'S

TRUE LORD PROTECTOR

OLIVER CROMWELL

3rd September,1658 

Oliver Cromwell's LETTER and SPEECHES

by

THOMAS CARLYLE

May 1888

*

'Slavery they can have anywhere. It is a seed that grows in every soil.'

EDMUND BURKE.

 

JUNE 23-PT 2/14-2016

(Please note: that the above JUNE 23 x 14 monthly bulletins are additional to the usual x 6 JUNE monthly bulletins to enable us to bring forward relevant information from over 13 years.)

STAGGERING FIGURES

THAT REVEAL WE'D

BE

BETTER OFF OUT

[OF THE COLLECTIVIST-GODLESS-UNACCOUNTABLE-UNDEMOCRAIC

EU

For most of us, taxes, food and fuel are the biggest items in our budgets-and in every one of these areas, we will be better off if we withdraw from the EU. The strongest case for

VOTING TO LEAVE

is that it offers a

BETTER FUTURE

Not just a safer and a more democratic future, where Britain's pride, confidence and global links are restored. We'll also be better off in then literal, financial sense and

 HERE'S WHY

TAX BILLS WOULD BE SLASHED

BRITAIN'S contribution to the EU this year is

£19 BILLION GROSS

This is equivalent to the combined revenue in the UK of the

Vehicle Excise (£5.9 billion)

Capital Gains Tax (£5.4 billion)

Air Passenger Duty (£3.2 billion

Inheritance Tax (£3.9 billion )

Petroleum Tax (£1.2 billion )

Not having to shell out this huge sum to Brussels would, for example, allow the entire country to get a 71% rebate in council tax (which raises £27.6 billion)

Or

WE COULD STOP HAVING TO CUT PUBLIC SERVICES.

Between 2010 and 2015, our net contribution to the EU (after deducting money returned to or spent in this country) amounted to

£45.4 BILLION

This is considerably more than the £35 billion by which government departments cut their spending in the same period.

*  *  *

PART 2

YOUR FOOD WOULD BE CHEAPER.

Britain is unusual in the EU, being a FOOD IMPORTER with relatively large and efficient farms. We have always been penalised by the

COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY (CAP)

paying more into the system than other states

and

GETTING LESS OUT

Before we joined the then EEC in 1973, we imported food from outside Europe

CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

Joining the CAP and so increasing our

DEPENDENCE

on

IMPORTS

from within Europe meant

FOOD PRICES ROSE SHARPLY

especially

MEAT

DAIRY PRODUCTS and CEREALS

LEAVING THE CAP WOULD SEE OUR FOOD PRICES FALL BACK TOWARDS NON-EU LEVELS AS TARIFFS AND QUUOTAS ARE DROPPED AND WE RETURN TO GLOBAL TRADING.

 

Lower household bills would then act as a stimulus to the entire economy.

Remainers insist that British  farmers would be in trouble without subsidies from EU.

BUT THIS ISN'T TRUE

Our net annual contribution to the

 CAP

£5 BILLION

If we didn't have to pay this to

BRUSSELS

It would be possible not only to maintain the current level of support  British farmers get from EU, but to increase it handsomely, while still making a substantial saving for the nation.

Where I live, in beautiful countryside on the Hampshire-Berkshire border, upper class welfarism is surprisingly widespread.

The talk at parties will often turn to, say how you get £30,000 a year from the Government by installing a woodchip boiler, which can then conveniently be used to heat your swimming pool.

Because most alternative energy schemes benefit people who own land, woods, and suitable sites for wind farms, they end up becoming a form of regressive taxation.

People on low and medium incomes pay higher electricity  bills to subsidise

LANDOWNERS

who in many cases, then become part of the

POWERFUL AND ARTICULATE PRO BRUSSELS LOBBY.

Not in every case, of course, there are Eurosceptic landowners, just as there are MEPS, who want

 

PUT THEMSELVES OUT OF WORK

*  *  *

 

PART 3

 ......AND SO WOULD ENERGY PRICES

AS A RESULT of EU POLICY, we have some of the highest gas and electricity bills in the World

Brussels drives up prices in two ways-through settoing renewables targets and since 2010,

THROUGH DIRECT LEGISLATION.

AS a result, a medium-sized business in the EU e.g.

ENGLAND

pays

20 PERCENT MORE FOR ENERGY THAN AN EQUIVALENT FIRM IN CHINA

65 PER CENT MORE THAN IN INDIA

AND

100 PER CENT MORE THAN IN THE USA.

These artificially high energy prices have already closed down vast swathes of

BRITAIN'S STEEL INDUSTRY

and

now threaten to cripple other

HIGH-ENERGY MANUFACTURING SECTORS.

Uncompetitive energy prices, forced on us by polices from

BRUSSELS

place British manufactures at a disadvantage vis-a-vis their non-EU--competitor.

AS LONG AS BRITISH BUSINESS ARE REGULATED FROM ABROAD, WE CANNOT ENSURE THAT THEY OPERATE WITHIN A FRAMEWORK TAILORED TO SUIT THEIR OWN NEEDS.

 

 

*  *  *

 

Please, please sack me! Euro MP DANIEL HANNAN on ... - Daily Mail Saturday, April 9,2016

and

Euro MP DANIEL HANNAN lays bare our impotence in ... - Daily Mail

www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Why-Britain-never-wants-EU-Seventy-times-tried-block-EU-laws-Seventy-times-failed-Euro-MP-DANIEL-HANNAN-la...
13 hours ago ... Euro MP Daniel Hannan said the EU is 'utterly incapable' of reform and that
 

*  *  *

5

positive reasons to

VOTE LEAVE and take back

CONTROL

EUROPE-YES

EU-NO

 

1-Our money-our priorities

 2-Take back control over

our laws.

 3-Build a fairer, safer immigration system.

4-Free to trade with the whole world.

 5-VOTE LEAVE

 

is the

SAFER CHOICE.

 

 

More information from:-

 

VOTE LEAVE

WESTMINSTER TOWER

3 ALBERT EMBANKMENT

LONDON

SE1 7SP

 

*  *  *

You can't equate a financial cost with the  freedom to rule yourselves and be a part of that process to decide your country's future and your own destiny rather than being a human being without that human spirit of dignity of individuality and conscience - to be nothing but a robot. And as you should now know you will need all your wits about soon when the present slow  transfer of jobs to the mechanical mind will become a flood and then you will certainly need your independent mind to keep you in a job or even in existence.

The future is bright for mankind so long as they have  a mind of their own, and this can only truly happen- if they are FREE!

* * *

H.F 758

 
 

A NEW WORLD CASE FOR PRESERVING THE' RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN'

 *

PART I

 

[The following extracts are from :

The Influence Of Magna Carta on American Development

by H.D. Hazeltine, M.A., Litt.D

[1917]

-because of the extensive research developed in this subject we will be only selecting some of the available material to emphasis what we have already lost and why we must fight to regain the treasonable handovers by our politicians over the past 35 years of:

'The Rights and Liberties Of Englishmen.']

 

*

THE INFLUENCE OF MAGNA CARTA ON AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT

 

For seven centuries Magna Carta has exerted a powerful influence upon the constitutional and legal development. During the first four centuries after 1215 this influence was confined to ENGLAND and the British Isles.

With the growth of the British Empire during the last three hundred years, the principles of the Charter have spread to many of the political communities which have derived their constitutional and legal systems from ENGLAND, and which have owed in the past, or which still owe, allegiance to the mother-country.

The earliest, and perhaps the most important phrase of this imperial history of Magna Carta is its effect upon the constitutions and laws of the American colonies and of the Federal Union [of the United States of America] that was established after the War of Independence.

[In 2007 every Englishman must be aware that we are ourselves in a battle in our own

WAR of INDEPENDENCE

-the first shots have yet to be fired to reclaim of inherited rights and liberties should it be the only way forward to reclaim that which has been by stealth and treacherous and illegal means has been taken from us. As in the Great Rebellion the Cause will divide families and brothers and sisters but the result will be Victory for our Cause because we have Right and Legitimacy on our side.]

*

In this story of the Charter's influence upon American constitutional development three separate periods should be distinguished. The colonial period, which began with the granting of the first Virginia Charter by James 1 in 1606 and ended about 1760, was followed by the epoch of the American revolution.

With the Treaty of Paris of 1783, in which Great Britain acknowledged her former colonies to be

"free, sovereign, and independent States,"

-the present period of national existence had its definite beginnings.

 

[As in 2007 all loyal citizens of our ancient constitution are fighting to defend the same ideals which were given to our colonies those hundreds of years ago. It is the mother-of parliaments appealing to her children to come to her aid to defend those rights and liberties which have been treasured for almost 800 years.]

Each one of these periods is closely related to earlier events and ideas in the history of ENGLAND and of the Colonies. Together the three periods constitute American constitutional and legal evolution is one that rests for its FOUNDATION upon the long centuries of ENGLISH development that preceded  its own beginnings, and that bears also, in a marked degree, the imprint of the constitutional and legal changes in ENGLAND during the period of colonization and even in later times.

Indeed, rightly to understand the constitutional and legal history of the colonies and of the United States of America, in each period of which magna Carta plays a role, we should not forget that the Englishmen who settled in America in the seventeenth century inherited all the preceding ages of ENGLISH history.

 

To them belonged Magna Carta and the Common Law; to them belonged the legal traditions of the Tudor age  - the age that immediately preceded the period of colonization.  The colonies did not fail to enter upon their inheritance; and the result has been that colonial institutions and principles, both of public and of private law, retained much of the Tudor and pre-Tudor tradition, and that even today [1917] American institutions and principles bear the impress of its influence today in 2007.]

For ENGLAND the seventeenth century was the first great age of the Empire - the age of commercial and colonial expansion not only in the West, but in the East; and it was the age also of the momentous struggle at home between the CROWN and PARLIAMENT - between the claims of the royal prerogative and of parliamentary supremacy.

[In 2007 the CROWN and PARLIAMENT has deceived the PEOPLE by the gradual process of handing over our 'accustomed rights and liberties' under the smokescreen of an illegal war and its consequent backlash of resentment from the Muslim world and a great majority of the people in our once respected and law-abiding democratic country.]

In America the seventeenth century was pre-eminently the age of settlement and the growth of chartered conies, either of proprietary or corporate character, this American development constituting one phrase of ENGLISH expansion; and it was likewise the age in which results of constitutional conflict in ENGLAND exerted their first influences upon the development of colonial institutions and of colonial legal and political ideas.

The growth of the colonies in America meant, from the very beginning, the extension of ENGLISH institutions and laws to these little ENGLAND'S across the sea.  To their birth-right of the ENGLISH traditions of the sixteenth and earlier centuries was now added the gift of the constitutional and legal principles established in seventeenth-century ENGLAND, the ENGLAND of Stuart kings, of Commonwealth and Protectorate, of REVOLUTION; for changes in the public and private law of ENGLAND during the century directly and vitally affected constitutional and legal growth in the colonies.

 

As the Common Law heritage of ENGLISHMEN in the colonies. Thus , Like Magna Carta itself, the great constitutional documents of the seventeenth century, such as the

PETITION OF RIGHT

HABEAS CORPUS ACT

-and the

BILL OF RIGHTS

-have a colonial as well as a purely ENGLISH history. To these STATUTES, as to Magna Carta, the colonists turned as the documentary evidence of the

 

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ALL ENGLISHMEN

-whether they resided in the home-land or in the ENGLISH communities of America.

[How can Englishmen of the 21st century stand by and see that great inheritance which has proved its sacred nature in America and in many new nations in the world to be sacrificed by our Government in order to join a system which destroys the very sacred inheritance developed and defended with much blood over the centuries be cast aside by a 21st century King John and even worse supported by that very ancient institution our House of Commons the very institution which was developed to protect our inherited rights and liberties.  We cannot allow this to happen and with the world looking on - we cannot let it happen.]

.... From the early eighteenth century down to the present day American institutions have developed, in the main, along their own lines, largely upon the basis of English development in the seventeenth century and earlier centuries, colonial development in the seventeenth century, and American political thought and constructive statesmanship of the eighteenth , nineteenth , and twentieth centuries.

This striking divergence of American from English institutions, dating from the early eighteenth century, is in sharp contrast with the history of law. Through out the eighteenth century, though perhaps less in the period of the Revolution, English Common Law continued to influence the development of colonial legislation and judicial decisions; and even today the American system of Common Law and Equity is in its fundamental characteristics the same as that of England.

 

So, too, in certain leading features of constitutional law - as distinct from constitutional institutions,  such as the American system of three co-ordinate departments of government and the power of the judicature to declare an Act of the legislature null and void because in conflict with the written constitution -we see a striking persistence of English principles.

[Unfortunately the omission of  a written constitution in Britain has made the progress of its absorption into a United States of Europe  that much easier for its politicians over the last 35 years. Our safety depended on our representatives honouring the 'Checks and Balances' or Conventions of the Realm which they soon realised were easy to assail and demolish with their task over 35 years almost complete before the people had realised what was afoot. Fortunately at the eleventh hour which appears an English characteristic it has now begun to awake from its slumber and realising just in time that there was indeed a threat to their Customs (Values) Constitution and Country.]

Rights and Liberties of Englishmen embodied in Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, and other constitutional documents became vital features of colonial constitutional law, and have continued throughout the revolutionary and national epochs to the present day to be essential elements of American constitutional law.

The story of the influence of Magna Carta on American constitutional development is but one phase of the whole history of English institutions and law in America, and this in turn is but one chapter in the history of a broader, a further-reaching development -the extension of English institutions and of English Common and Statutory Law to the many communities that have formed or still form parts of the British Empire [1917]

In studying Magna Carta in America we are concerned, therefore, with one feature and one only, of this whole vast process. But just as the influence of Magna Carta in England itself cannot be understood apart from the long history of the ever changing body of rules and principles that go to make up the system of English Common Law, of which the provisions of Magna Carta form only a part, so, too an understanding of the influence of Magna Carta in America can only be reached by considering this great legal document as but one of the many sources of English Common Law in its American environment.  In the present paper certain main features of the American development, throughout its three period, will be suggested; but without any attempt at exhaustive consideration.

I.  From the very beginning the colonists claimed they were entitled as Englishmen to the law of Englishmen - the Common Law as a great corpus juris based on the decisions of the courts and on the statutory enactments of Parliament, in a body of rules of private and public law which secured to Englishmen their rights as private individuals in their relations one with another and also their rights and liberties as subjects of the Crown.

It was the Common Law of England which the various colonies, acting through their executive, legislature, and judicature, adopted or received, either partially or wholly, as the law adapted to the needs of English communities in America.

Along with the English Law thus received by the colonists, there grew up in various American communities new rules and principles based on colonial  customs, the reformative skill of colonial law-makers, and in the Puritan colonies of NEW ENGLAND

-natural or Divine law.

[In claiming the Common law as their own the colonists were but applying Lord Chief Justice of England - Edward Coke's  (Cook's) doctrine (12 Rep.39) (1603)  that

"the law and custom of England is the inheritance of the subject"

 

That Lord Phillips, our present Lord Chief Justice of England,  is what the millions of loyal subjects to the true constitution of England intend to defend in the year 2007 as our forebears in the past .

 

*

 

 

TO BE CONTINUED in

PART 2

 

 

*          *          *

[Font Altered-Bolding &Underlining Used -Comments in Brackets]

FEBRUARY/07

 

*

Brought Forward from 2007

 

 

H.F.757

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

2016 and the chance to shape our destiny 

As we bid farewell to 2015, we look back on a truly tumultuous year in British politics – and one in which the wider world has become an ever more volatile and dangerous place.

It has been a year of the unexpected in which the certainties of those ‘in the know’ have been consistently confounded.

David Cameron’s stunning election victory – against the predictions of virtually every pollster – ushered in the first majority Tory government for nearly two decades and left Labour in tatters.

Against pollsters' predictions: David Cameron’s stunning election victory left Labour in tatters. The Prime Minister is pictured with his wife Samantha entering 10 Downing Street following the Conservatives' win in May

Against pollsters' predictions: David Cameron’s stunning election victory left Labour in tatters. The Prime Minister is pictured with his wife Samantha entering 10 Downing Street following the Conservatives' win in May

Despite Ed Miliband’s belief that he was destined for Number 10, the electorate utterly rejected his pernicious brand of tax-and-spend Socialism. Then in the chaotic aftermath of defeat, the party turned in on itself by choosing an even more Left-wing leader in Jeremy Corbyn.

Under Tory stewardship the British economy has continued to grow. There are now a record 31.3million people in work, unemployment is at its lowest since the crash, wages are rising in real terms and the number of children in workless households has fallen by half a million.

Elsewhere in the world, 2015 was a year of almost unimaginable horror. The barbarians of Islamic State have cut a bloody swathe through the Middle East and brought murderous terror to the beaches of Tunisia, the magazine offices, cafes and concert halls of Paris and the suburbs of Brussels.

That Britain didn’t witness a major attack was thanks to the admirable vigilance of the security services – and a huge slice of luck.

For we should be in no doubt, as last night’s huge security presence at New Year celebrations underlined, we remain a prime target.

 

Problems within Labour: In the chaotic aftermath of defeat, the party turned in on itself by choosing an even more Left-wing leader in Jeremy Corbyn

Meanwhile, caught between IS and the ruthless forces of President Assad, more than 3 million refugees have fled Syria, many heading across the Mediterranean in leaky and overcrowded boats to reach the promised land of Europe.

This surge of humanity has created huge tensions as EU member nations struggle to stem the tide.

Barbed wire fences have been erected on external borders and the Schengen agreement, allowing free movement between states, is close to collapse.

In Britain, annual net migration soared to more than 330,000 in 2015 – a patently unsustainable level – with hundreds of thousands more heading our way.

And it is this migration crisis that brings us to the great challenge for 2016.

The EU referendum – which will determine our political destiny for a generation or more – is now expected to go ahead this summer.

 

Desperation: More than 3 million refugees have fled Syria, many heading across the Mediterranean in leaky and overcrowded boats to reach the promised land of Europe 

Mr Cameron’s attempts to achieve even modest reform have been firmly rebuffed, so he now has two options. He can either try to fool the public by presenting meaningless concessions from the EU as a resounding victory, or come clean and admit that Brussels is simply not interested in radical reform.

The Mail believes voters are entitled to hear the unvarnished truth before making their momentous decision, which also means lifting the gag on Eurosceptic Cabinet ministers.

In his New Year message, Mr Cameron says the nation must decide whether we are ‘stronger and better off’ in the EU or on our own. Quite so.

There are honest and powerful arguments on both sides and they must all be heard without further delay.

Above all, Britain simply has to win back control over its borders – whether by negotiating real change in EU terms or parting company with Brussels.

As this paper has said repeatedly, Mr Cameron has the opportunity to be a great reforming Tory Prime Minister. This is the year he must grasp it.

And with that thought, we wish all our readers a happy and peaceful New Year.

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 20-2014

H F 424

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

Eurosceptic MPs warn David Cameron

HE faces revolt over EU ...

 

by Jason Groves-Deputy Political Editor.

Let-ministers-campaign- to - leave-EU-or-they'll-quit-Eurosceptic -MPs-warn-Cameron-faces-revolt-referendum.

...Wycombe MP Mr Baker told Sky News  that Mr Cameron would spark a Cabinet walkout if he tried to persuade Eurosceptic ministers to back his campaign to keep Britain [ENGLAND locked] in the EU. He said: It is inevitable that some members of the Cabinet [In a so-called DEMOCRACY] feel they have to resign if they are browbeaten into supporting a deal which is so [laughably a sick joke as to be even called ] flimsy

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER 21-2015

H.F.654

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER 11,2015

H.F.650

 

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 INSIDE [ENGLAND'S] BRITAIN'S SHARIA COURTS

 

There are now SIXTY-FIVE Islamic courts dispensing

'justice' [?] across the UK. This special investigation into what really goes on behind their doors will shock you to the core [and will confirm what stupid ignorant P C politicians you have in YOUR once FREE PARLIAMENT.]

 Guy Adams INVESTIGATES

[We must be the laughing stock of the whole world but particularly of the Muslim World. What are the chances of 3,000,000 Christians moving to an Islamic Country allowed to practice their faith in their own churches and under English Common Law?NIL!]

 

EXTRACT

Sitting in one room, a young Muslim women tells an elderly cleric about the parlous state of her marriage to a 50-year-old-man.

'He oppressed me to the maximum,' she declares. 'He  is violent, physically, and treats me like a dog.'

The women-who looks barely out of her early 20s-describes her spouse as verbally and physically abusive about 'every little thing ' she does.

When the husband's around, he forces her to wear a headscarf. When he isn't, which is often, he likes to travel to Tunisia, where she suspects he has secretly married several women.

For all she knows, she adds, he might have accumulated as many as ten wives. Fighting back tears, as she finishes this tale of betrayal, the women glances to the cleric, who has a long white beard and sits at a raised desk in front of a bookcase full of Islamic texts.

Perhaps she's hoping for a supportive smile, confirming she's not at fault.  Maybe she's seeking reassurance that the man will hold her misogynistic wife-beating husband to account.

Instead, the elderly cleric, whose name is Suhaib Ghasan, starts laughing. 'Why did you marry such a person?' he chuckles.

Down the corridor, another vulnerable Muslim women is telling a second cleric about her ill-fated marriage. This women, in her 30's says that at 19 she was coerced by her family into marrying a Bangladeshi illegal immigrant who duly gained British citizenship) They had two children, but the relationship foundered.

"There was a lot of fighting. He threw stuff at me. He put me in debt,' she says.

The husband, to whom she gave £38,000 during their time together is now back in Bangladesh, where he's taken a second wife. The woman has not seen him for four years, and therefore wants a divorce.

But the cleric won't grant one. Instead, says a witness, he decides to 'tell her about the "scientific biologic reasons for  polygamy"'

Finally, the cleric, Maulana Abu Sayeed, makes an effort, in the words of the witness, to 'persuade the women towards acceptance of the marriage in polygamous form'.

This being the 21st century, the women isn't prepared to play ball. So she leaves unhappy.

Elsewhere , in the same building a third hearing is taking place, presided over by a much younger cleric, Furgan Mahmood. In front of him sits a nervous-looking Muslim couple, who have several children.

 

FULL ARTICLE

[Just with these two instances we can see how the immigration laws are side-stepped and the further encouragement for POLYGAMY.  Both matters need to be dealt with sternly.

 They are making a mockery of

 ENGLISH LAW and CUSTOM.

As we have said so many times we are so-called governed by politically-correct brainless-mindless and  traitorous idiots.

WE MUST!

SHUT THAT DOOR

NOW!

 

ONE SENIOR CLERIC CLAIMED IT WAS WRONG TO PROSECUTE MEN THAT RAPE THEIR WIVES

*

WHEN A WOMEN DESCRIBED BEING BEATEN AND ABUSED THE COURT OPFFICIAL CHUCKLED.

[The idiot trio in the article above have brought about this dangerous and farcical and unjust practice totally alien to English Law. ]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 14 - 2014

H .F. 648

 

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

In our infrastructure in our politicians in our institutions in our communities

BUT STILL MANY WON'T FACE FACTS

*

Winston Churchill said over 50 years ago that:

"The Germans, after all had been belligerent for over 2000 years." "They never change."  How soon his words of wisdom and warning are forgotten.  Europe's leaders may not even fully understand what the GEU (German EU) is about. From 1999 to 2001 foreign companies took over 2,779 U.S. companies (worth $766 billion dollars) in an economic Blitzkrieg: mainly Germany , using France as junior aide, to ward off come-backs. How were such sales and so much money contrived?

 

[Before we answer this question and dozens of others we acknowledge the assistance of the following author whose record of being witness to the rise of Nazism in the 1930's and his close contact with those who were shaping the future of Germany. The following extracts are from his

'Germany's Four Reich's']

 

 

Harry Beckhough was born in Bristol in 1914. He is an Honours graduate of Bristol University in philology, specialising in German. Studying in Freiburg University in 1933 he witness Hitler's rise to power.

In WW II, he was commissioned in the Royal Artillery, served in India, until taken over by Bletchley Park, (Station x) as Codebreaker.  he served with the 8th Army, breaking Rommel's signals and messages for Montgomery. After Alamein victory, he was recalled to India to serve with 14th (Burma) Army, dealing with Japanese code signals.

On return home as Lt.Col.R.A./Int, he became S.O.I. (Senior Officer) with Foreign Office -with the remit to resuscitate the Rhineland Universities of Cologne and Bonn. There he met regularly, Dr Konrad Adenauer C.D.U., Chancellor of the first post- war German Government, members of his family and Ministers. Over 4 years, to end in  1950 he met many of the leading statesmen and prominent figures in Bonn, seat of the first post-war Government.

As an academic, in charge of the 2 Universities. they spoke freely to him of their plans the future. He has extensive knowledge of Germany, and has explored the development of its

AGGRESSIVE NATURE FROM ITS EARLIEST YEARS.

His book reveals that inherited desire for DOMINATION which has been GERMANY'S major characteristic through major wars and battles over centuries (2000 years), invariably ending in CHAOS, as exemplified by their German philosopher, NIETZSCHE.

Other books written by the author:

"Secret Communications"

"German Universities After WWII

" In the Beginning"

 

[We had the pleasure of meeting Mr Harry Beckhough at a recent meeting of many concerned about the drift of our country into a United States of Europe. After we had read his most comprehensive analysis of the German 's FIRST - SECOND - THIRD and at the present FOURTH REICH we felt its contents needed a greater coverage as we are soon so near to Germany accomplishing her aim unless the people in our once free country take to the streets to defend their legacy of Rights and Liberties of 1500 years in the making. Those many years ago the Germanic tribes that settled in their new home of ENGLAND became because of their island isolation a different people from those who stayed in their homeland so we the ENGLISH should more than any race have and should understand the threat they pose to our present future in 2007.

 

In order to get the complete message to you all we intend to place a short weekly up-date of the books contents on our FRONT PAGE the few paragraphs will be identified by their background of black with red print as we do at the moment to identify the

German Nazi agencies at work in Europe and around the world today in 2007.]

*

 

Unusually we will start with the  final paragraphs of the book under the heading:

Epilogue: On the German Character.

 

Previous attempts to summarise the multi-sided character of the Germans, have proved beyond the scope of previous authors, historians, philosophers and psychologists, especially of their own people.

The German remains a complex people of many -sided facts. Their major development period, circa 1500 to 1800, eventually produced a linguistic, literary and philosophic form of unification, developing from Mittel-Hoch-Deutsch, to an overdone Romanticism period, which produced some of the greatest writers (especially Goethe), musicians of outstanding quality, and philosophers, claiming Judaeo-Hellenic roots.

Followed by the hugely overdone industrialisation of the Bismarck period 1850 to 1914, from one extreme to another, suddenly changing from an agricultural country to extreme mechanical and industrial excess development. From a period of huge profits and great prosperity, flaunted to the world caricatures ,in final collapse and bankruptcy.

Finally the Hitler process of 'Gleichschaltung' (equalisation), seeking to create the impossible : a Nazi image of a one-type German Volk to become a national unit equivalent of Masters and slaves. But this unification only caused [pluralism - the fundamental split personality of the German -ever changing. The real German problem is unity in moderation and moderation in unity. He lacks reality, commonsense and good judgment. But invariably blames others for his troubles. But savagery always ready to burst forth at the slightest provocation.

 

He needs goals to be set by superiors, and is always ready to obey orders. Racism achieves domination and hegemony. he cannot clearly distinguish TRUE from FALSE, and confuses TRUTH with IDEOLOGY. Hence his love of intricate plots rarely reaching conclusion, getting lost or set astray with side issues.

 

He lives in a false world with distorted views conflicting TRUE and FALSE, GOOD and EVIL, PEACE and WAR. But seeks to TERRIFY and FRIGHTEN. He loves to organise, but loses his head if plans go awry, as happened with Hitler's rages, smashing order into chaos, and collapse of a scheme.

Above all he needs a strong leader, standing ready to obey, and follow. Without a Fuhrer, Germans become lost and confused. Generally hated for their arrogance, imperialism and brutal inhumanity, with outbursts of fury for little cause. But he enjoys his hatreds with a lethal intensity. "The ever-furious people" as [their] Nietzsche calls his 'Tauscher Volk'.

 

They are born wreckers -first of the Roman Empire, latterly of the League of Nations, now undermining both the United Nations and NATO. But their substitution, like their new Franco-German Constitution, may eventually collapse like a House of Cards, lacking a firm foundation, being constructed in hidden, mysteriously conceived, contrived and often confused plans, not properly finalised.

 

Pretending to act for the general good in a community of 'equals', their target is eventually revealed:

FIRST:-

an EU Super state,

- en route deviously to become a

German dominated Dictatorship.

We are coerced and invited to yield:

OUR SOVEREIGNTY

ANCIENT RIGHTS

and

HARD-WON

FREEDOM

-to become, for the first time in our history, a vassal state under the German jackboot. WWI and WWII should have taught us the brutal German reality.

 

I pray that our Leaders will remove their blinkers, to reveal German connivance in the reality of our appalling situation, in which we have been deceived and exploited since 1972. For this unhappy world once again is in sore need of our STRENGTH and GOOD LEADERSHIP, as a FREE BRITAIN, against the growing evil of TERRORISM, again endangering WORLD PEACE in the present century.

*

[As previously mentioned we shall be continuing with the remainder of Harry Beckhough's intensely researched book with further additions available on our FRONT PAGE.]

 

Key Features of German Deceit

In 1992 France became bound to Russia, as her agreed agent, to bring Russia into an extended European Federation -to promote collective security. In 1990 Professor Herzog denigrated the nation state, publicly identifying with Lenin's objective. The 1992 Maastricht Treaty then deprived EU nation states of key elements of their sovereignty; their currency, internal and external security, transferred, for the first time, to a European institution.

[Thanks a lot! Douglas Hurd our British Foreign Secretary at Maastricht  -WE don't of course - as that traitor to his country even was overheard after signing the Treaty to say:

'We'd better find out what we've just signed'

On that day in February 1992 after his committed Treachery to his country he was accompanied by the now  Conservative chairman Francis Maud another traitor to his true party's ideals and his country.]

Yet America's materialistic world seemed oblivious of the frightening reality, of the concealed intentions of this menacing, reborn German fast growing giant, with huge secret resources immediately available. Though the German Mark became worthless post-war, and the Black Market ruled a bargaining scene, until we created their new currency Mark in 1997/8, as I witnessed.

So whence came this sudden huge wealth?

Where was it stored in the Nazi era?

 

[YES! you have guessed right as you will have indicated on our Front Page]

Meanwhile, German military is rebuilding .fast and secretly as in 1920s/30s, using pseudo peace-keeping roles, as excuse to catch up with British military strength.

Playing a clever role in Kosovo, Croatia, being helpful in supplying peace-keeping troops, all undergoing strict home training. The old German trickery is still there, as deceitful and two-forked as ever. Adept at convincing lies, matching those of its Leninist? KGB trained ally, at the devil's trade of deceit, to which the West falls easy, trusting victim. Always with America especially ,in their sights (as also Britain), whilst proffering friendship. Now both the KGB-led Russian dictatorship and the

GEU (German European Union) Super state  

 

-are seeking global power and world domination by pseudo -peaceful means, using every trick [As our slippery Tony Blair and the other traitors] in their training.

These are aimed specifically at America and Britain, both economically and militarily.

 

Britain's so-called "New Labour" Government has recklessly thrown its lot in with German-led Europe.

[We would not be surprised if Tony Blair has his eyes on the new job of President of the New European Union should that monstrosity ever be brought into being. Of course we have already explained that we would NEVER agree to be part of such a collective Mammoth Police State and Evil conspiracy.]

America has fallen prey to every conceivable form of espionage in the 20/21st century from Russia, China, the East, Asia and the Arab world. But it is now learning fast not to put its trust in erstwhile 'Friends' in Europe, to the Arab world, from France to Arabia.  And to trade to its own well-protected and insured benefit, with trustworthy, proven allies, balancing gains and losses.

 

Thus America is now considering possible closure of well-established bases in Germany, and the danger of leaving these in the hands of a so-called friend.  Now known to be otherwise -preparing to bite the hand that restored it from its defeated collapse and misery, from a cruel, bloody War, started once again (as ever ) by Germany -never to be trusted, glorying in its success of LIES and DECEIT.

[It is to be remembered that the U.S. after WWII helped over 700 Nazi scientists and other callings to the United States and many used their influence and their successors also to foster the Nazi programme of future world domination  as clearly elaborated on by

 International Currency Review

Details on our Front Page

www.worldreports.org

cstory@worldreports.org

 *

Germany has been allowed, by its so readily trusting friend and hosts, to establish permanent military facility at Alamagordo, New Mexico, with (scarcely credible) an open -skies treaty for German planes flying over and surveying (and mapping) in totem. [As they did before the WWI and up to WWII when their people were everywhere in the Middle East and other areas mapping out future places of conflict] Something which needs 100% secrecy for complete safety. Even conducting training and joint military exercises - for German identification records.  Like Samson giving away the secret of his great strength - with resultant downfall, to his undoing. America should now look closely to her security.

Just as the Chinese were able to obtain all U.S. classified, most sensitive military, technical and nuclear information (painstakingly developed and built up over many years of highest quality operations, by most qualified American and British staff of highly trained experts - at tremendous cost and outstanding success) -simply by being able to tap into improperly guarded U.S. computer, technical system, without restriction and with minimum effort. Thus China, in quick time, learnt all U.S. secrets and was able to construct her own copies of U.S. nuclear warheads, with all technical know-how, and sell them on! Enough to make strong men weep!  But America has the resilience to ride its body-blows and restore terms with China.

Now German EU originally favoured, trusted and assisted by America [See Bilderbergers] , grows steadily stronger, militarily and economically-posing future menace, led by Germany, already seeking to undermine America in every way. Of course not openly, as is definitely not their nature, until ready for open combat -but through GEU.

Time we awoke [this was written  just a few years ago but in the closing months of 2006 there was a definite awakening as growing numbers are now joining the Anti-EU banner -see [http://eutruth.org.uk]]  to the dangers closing in on us, in this latest travesty of an all-embracing EU Constitution rending us [that means YOU!] in a vassal state. [of the Fourth Reich].

 

ALL  20 of Germany's nuclear plants have unlimited licences.  200 American nuclear bombs are now in WMD storage vaults in EU states, with 55 in Germany.

 

The EU possesses 710 nuclear bombs. Germany has an advanced science and technology base, capable of supporting an advanced nuclear programme. This needs careful assessment for future consideration. Our British/American defence organisations seem to have no conception of this ongoing, tremendous build -up of power -with the sole aim of the creation of a

Super state Dictatorship

 

-with world control.

Whilst we continue to reduce our Armed Forces and equipment, Germany is quietly building hers (already more than equal to ours), with Europe providing the rest. They  have cleverly convinced first, Britain's P.M. Blair, and now America that they will not bypass NATO, when their intention is clearly to reduce NATO and then do away with it, leaving GEU German European Union in full power and able to argue with, if not threaten, America.

 

We learn in the Daily Mail of the 2nd February, 2007 that the NATO mission in Afghanistan is handing over leadership to an American commander - after all the trouble and fanfare to show NATO solidarity not so long ago. Obviously the Americans are learning a few lessons  of their own at this late state in the diplomacy game before they too find themselves with their defences completely useless after their long fraternisation programme in post-war Germany.]

Russia, in close co-operation with German since Bismarck, is seen both as partner and secretly, future target. The case of the Russian enclave, now cut off from Russia by the Independent Balkan states - Kaliningrad (formally Konigsberg, the centre of historic Prussia) presents a classic case of the German use of the EU, plus massive loans to Russia, to achieve expansion Eastward.

[Well we are all now aware that the German's have a very-very-very close relationship with Russia in many fields BUT particularly in the Energy field. It will be a weapon that our enemy of the 20th century will use with its superior military forces at its time of choosing and we should all remember what happens when a country allows it military forces to become a ridiculed second rate pantomime show.]

 

The huge loans arranged for Russia by Germany, cause weighty instability for the Russian economy and political dependence of German goodwill, with calculated benefit and lack of interference with German plans.

Chancellor Kohl calculated that these major bonds would serve as a foundation for reconstruction of the Russian economy, and close co-operation with Germany. However the arrival of Putin, trained by KGB, may produce firmer self-interest by Russia.

Discussions progress on conversion of this huge German debt into equity stakes in Russian companies, which now have greater freedom to develop, especially in oil and commodities.

Chris Patten, EU Commissioner responsible for external affairs, has made the first steps (quoted by the Times), in discussing the possible political status of Kaliningrad in the enlarged EU -to suit German EU, whom he seems to serve more than his own country.

 

The Euro and the projected European Army (of envisaged great strength), are important major steps in the creation of the planned corporatist, anti-democratic, anti-nation state power, based on German Europe ,as the EU Constitution of a Super state, to compete against American global strength and world authority. Always the great competitive target for global ambitious Germany.

*

Expanding by Ratchets

 

In 1970 the renewed German-Soviet Treaty for

"FRIENDSHIP and CO-OPERATION"

was signed, assuring their everlasting understanding -always included in Germany's secret plans for total reinstatement (already ipso facto regained)-and future control of greater Europe, both West and East -the same as ever target. It is truly amazing, on looking back, the ease with which Germany was able to deceive and convince America and Britain's leading Statesmen -but so did Gorbachev with his ready convincing stream of lies about his new Russia. Their joint ratchet found easy targets in the ever-trusting West.

 

East Germany overthrew their Communist regime in 1989, becoming one complete Germany again in 1990/91. The German democratic Republic became founder member of the Warsaw treaty Organisation, by the Warsaw Pact with Russia, then occupying the Russian Zone of Germany. The Berlin Wall built 1961, sealed off this Russian Zone from the West. In 1972 the Two Germany's signed a Pact of admittance to the United Nations. In 1991 came the overthrow of the Soviet government. Yeltsin and Gorbachev took power, expertly deceiving the West of their 'democratic' intentions.

In 1989 the Berlin Wall fell, bringing a neo-Nazi revival, cultivated strongly through the German Army (Bundeswehr). Nazi Germany came storming back as the communist stranglehold on East Germany was released. Violent racist incidents increased year on year to 1993.

In 1993 the Bundestag passed an asylum law, setting firm restrictions on immigrants seeking asylum. Still remaining anti-semitic, with disturbance of Jewish synagogues and cemeteries. Further reports of neo-Nazi revival in Germany.

In June 1991 the Bundestag voted to move their Capital back to Berlin  from Bonn (Adenauer's home town). May 1995 Manfred Roder -convicted Nazi terrorist- was invited to address the Bundeswehr [This has  memories of the Frederick Forsyth film the ODESSA-don't you think]

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall there are visible signs of return of the old spirit of independent arrogance, within the whole German nation. Now, again a bona fide word power, second only to the U.S. in arms exports,

with a standing army of circa 300,000, the largest in Europe

 

Already with France's help, leading the EU and soon to be recognised as a major nuclear power. Germany now back on top by usual clever manoeuving.

In 1990 a secret agreement between Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl accepted that the Bohemian and Moravian region belonged to the Germans.

ALSO

the final division of Czecho-slovakia and Yugoslavia by the end of 1992.

Germany planned to make a Customs Union of Europe, like Bismarck. Warnings by Roger Eatwell's: Fascism, Bernard Connolly's: THe Rotten Heart Of Europe and Margaret Thatcher's: The Downing Street years -

ALL GO UNHEEDED IN OUR SLEEPY APATHETIC NATION

Just as before WWII, with almost all Mainstream Press just as oblivious to the danger as they were before WWII.

[We have recently made a call to our at the moment FREE PRESS to open up the secret's of the EU but at a first glimmerings of activity it is obvious they only want to tinker out of harms way on the fringes of one of the GREATEST conspiracies in HISTORY. Possibly it is because after 50 years of backhanders and promises of special favours there are too many involved to bring the whole pack of cards to the ground. Who has the courage to start the ball rolling to collect up on its journey all the traitors and time-servers and to land on top of the Elite who have more to lose?

In 1995 Mrs Thatcher said in Parliament:

"You have not anchored Germany to Europe; you have anchored Europe to a newly dominant, unified Germany. In the end, my friends, you'll find it will not work."

Maybe not, but in the meantime they are expertly stirring the pot, causing ever more problems. [As no don't in February 2007].

Two years after the war-end, statistics now show that almost 50% of Bavarian civil servants belonged to the Nazi Party or its affiliates.

Of those dismissed by us, some 15,000 were reinstated. Almost all 11,000 teachers removed for political reasons were reinstated with 60% of the teaching staff employed by the German Ministry of Education and 81% of Judges, magistrates, prosecutors in the Ministry of Justice.

 Only in Universities were we able to keep good measure of control in the British Zone, by our direct command and control -with early denazification.

[It is obvious from the above that the Nazi Party continued in the main as it had always done but with for a time a lower profile awaiting their chance of future conquest which they have almost achieved in the early months of 2007.]

Inter-European unity has been long sought by the Hapsburg dynasty. Otto compared the similarities of the Holy Roman Empire of the Middle Ages with his own views on a destined

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

Churchill favoured a U.S.E. (United States of Europe) led by Britain. He said:

"It should be built by the British "

[Of course it would have been built on British values]

"If the Russians built it, there would be communism and squalor.

If the Germans built it there would be TYRANNY and BRUTE FORCE"

( Martin Gilbert: Churchill War Papers Vol 3)

 

How far-seeing!-[As we see today in February 2007]

 

Now in German control, as yet in shape unrealised by the victims, caught in a net of German deceit and empty promises [As with their agent Tony Blair in 2007], inexorably leading to complete mastery.

As the USSR faded into history , overtaken by the new KGB dictatorship, Germany, under its EU cloak, was already on its panned path to overtake America, with the size and growth of its extended economic values.

In May 1997, Roman Herzog (former German president), on being presented with the International Charlemagne Prize  for his efforts to unite Europe said:

 

"Charlemagne, himself , sought the unification of Europe -the truth must be told, only by wading through a sea of blood, sweat and tears, did he reach it. Germany has been Europe's greatest perpetrator, instigating that bloodshed."

[Well we have at least

1,250,000

Sacrifices

 

-places of rest - many in foreign fields in our struggles to overcome that perpetrator on two occasions in the 20th century

 

One wonders how Tony Blair came to be chosen for this prize? Joschka Fischer (ex Communist, now leader of the Green Party) said:

" Germany needs NOT democracy, but a system of Statecraft, similar to that of the Soviet dictatorship, enabling the German political and military elite to organise Europe's industrial capacity, and the military qualities of German people or of the revival of the German race, Europe is just an extension of Germany.

THAT SAID IT ALL

-with Fischer omniscient.

Yugoslavia was deliberately undermined by German Intelligence Service (bundesnachrichtendienst) under Klaus Kinkel, throughout the 1980's  using German agents working with former Croatian Fascists, close allies of Hitler (providing needed outlet for the Adriatic). They now destroyed the multi-ethnic state of Yugoslavia, arranging the breakaway of Catholic Croatia and Slovenia.

Marshall Tito established a new Constitution for Yugoslavia, known as the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. The Serbs had initiated the first union of the 3 nations, following the collapse of the Habsburg ruled Austro-Hungarian Empire, end of WWI in 1918. Tito broke with the Soviets, creating a new federal Republic, which lasted 30 years. But the political iron -will of Germany took only 10 years to break it

 

Milosovic may have been unfairly charged in the Hague -but Germany now has arranged a more compliant leader under her control. Once again Anglo-Americans have been fooled by German trickery.

 

German machinations in the Balkans in WWI were repeated in WWII. Yugoslavia, historical all of Britain against German imperialism, has now been broken up into the same religious and racial statelets the Nazi established: Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia had their own Waffen SS divisions.

In 1991 Germany followed by the Vatican, recognised Croatia, which massacred

1,000,000

Serbs-gypsies and Jews at Jasennovac concentration camp

The wartime Archbishop Stepinac, whose own priests helped run the extermination camp, was beatified by the present Pope in 2002!?

Albania was favoured by NATO as an ally of Germany, whilst operating the biggest drug and gun-running corridor through Kosovo and Tiranen. Germany gained control by outright purchase of their main asset, their chromite mines.

Albanians, in the historical Serb province of Kosovo, who has conducted massive ethnic cleansing of Serbs over 100 years, (with the help of Nazi during the war and Tito thereafter, were armed by Germany as

FREEDOM FIGHTERS

[For whose Freedom?]

Provoked by repeated terrorist attacks by Kosovo Freedom Fighters, the anticipated Serb response gave GERMAN-controlled Europe the excuse to lead NATO into an ILLEGAL war against a SOVEREIGN STATE -by cunning German contrivance. This served Germany's historical aim of destroying Serbia, helping to reclaim so-called German territory in the East, thus helping construction of German Europe, now the EU.

 

[And who do they agree to be dictator of Kosovo -Yes! you are right -Our own Bilderberger Paddy Ashdown who has only recently stood down to enjoy his retirement?

Similarly, with Macedonia the EU cleverly had NATO do all the donkey work, transforming it into a vassal state of the EU. So, if things go wrong, NATO will be blamed.

THUS ANOTHER CLEVER(?) GERMAN STROKE.

 

[The EU is all about NUMBERS and TERRITORY-They need to have ALL Europe under their control -there can be no exceptions. They have a deal with Russia as we shall find out to our cost when our energy supplies are restricted to achieve their blackmail terms. Mark our words the English people will rue the day it failed to keep a tight control over THEIR GOVERNMENT]

During the Second World War about

1,000,000

were massacred by Croation fascists. In 1989/90 came the first ethnic cleansing in Yugoslavia, after Germany officially recognised [their own WWII ally] Croatia, who established a blatantly nationalistic constitution discriminating against the SERBS. There are now over one million displaced Serbs, because of Germany's aggressive interference and plotting. In 1991 Germany unilaterally recognised Croatia and Slovenia as separate sovereign state, completing her astutely conceived DOMINATION of the BALTIC AREA.

Exporting $320 million dollars of hardware to Croatia, 4000 German troops in Croatia, the FIRST deployment of German troops [they now have over 300,000 troops in their Army] since WWII, to help enforce the so-called

'PEACE AGREEMENT'

[Typical NAZIS they create the unstable conditions in  the area by their hurried recognition of Croatia which served their purpose to arrive at the situation today. Tony Blair certainly had  good training in the same philosophy as our situation in February 2007 with only weeks away from him signing the March 2007

'DECLARATION OF BERLIN.'

[Note each of the above underlined words has a different bulletin.]

All the meddling and interference in  Croatia -All part of Germany's deep plan for overall

CONTROL of ALL EUROPE

-Both West and EAST, At the same time, settling old scores of WWII.

In the rest of Eastern Europe the agricultural economy has collapsed, because the EU prevents their exports to the West.  Their media, business and agricultural land are being acquired by Western European Business, especially German. Just as the NAZI planned in the 1930s, the national states of Europe, for whose freedom Britain and America fought two bloody wars, sacrificing their heroic young men, effectively, no longer exist as self-governing entities.

 

THE AFTERMATH OF WWII, WITH GERMANY NOW ESTABLISHED AS THE STRONGEST FORCE IN EUROPE

[NOW DO YOU BELIEVE YOUR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY IS IN GREAT DANGER?]

 

*

 

To the Serbs -an Independent Kosovo is anathema -Kosovo is their Jerusalem

Germany as the Strongman of Europe-A germanised Empire in the Making - PART 1

The New Beginning  - PART2

Germany's Third Reich -PART 3

Taskmasters of Europe -PART 4

A Warning Message To The Freedom Loving People Of England by Harry Beckhough

*

http://eutruth.org.uk

 

*

 

21st January, 2008

 

*          *          *

LATEST PUBLICATION FROM THE AUTHOR

December 13-2007

Thinker Tailor Soldier Spy

by Harry Beckhough    Price £18.99

A remarkable book about a soldier-code breaker-intelligence officer-teacher and political activist.

Send payment to THE JUNE PRESS LTD

PO BOX 119

TOTNES, DEVON TQ9 7WA

Tel: 08456 120 175

Email:info@junepress.com

WEB SALES www.junepress.com

*

 

[Font Altered-Bolding &Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

JANUARY/07

*

 

 

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

H.F.784

 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for Proportional Representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

 

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

&

 

WE ASK ON OCTOBER 30,2015

WHAT PROGRESS have the SMALL PARTIES MADE to COMBINE to FIGHT this

GROSS INJUSTICE?

 

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

 

*

 

Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

*

 

[As we have stated over many years we have been suspicious of UKIP leadership particularly of Nigel Farage who though he has the necessary 'gift of the gab' and charisma for the job-he has admitted  he has a History of working for over 20 years in the City Mile of London -an independent state-a hotbed of

TREASON-INTRIGUE-GREED-MURDER-CONSPIRACY

 for over 300 years.]

&

How The Crown Rules the World

*

*DID YOU KNOW?

The City of London is governed by the Illuminati-Freemasons and they are governed by their god Lucifer/Satan. The Bank of England owns the Central Banks established around the world, and this is the real power of the modern British Empire.

One example is
the United States Federal
Reserve Bank , which is wholly owned by the Bank of England and her subsidiaries. Thus the world has been enslaved by the Illuminati-Free-Mason conspiracy which exacts her tribute through interest on their various currencies.

"Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown 'slave' colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful."

"The Crown" has nothing to do with the Queen. It is a private corporation led by the Illuminati.
(See: +(1)+(1)+(1)

Government Conspiracies - World of Lies - Award Winning Documentary

AUGUST - 2010 

H.F.741

REMEMBER!

 

[Comments in brackets are ours!]

 

OCTOBER 30-2015

*  *  *

 
 

Workers would be

BETTER OFF

 by £40 a week after Brexit, say Economists.

by Hugo Duncan- Daily Mail

Deputy Finance Editor

April 29,2016

 

 

THE European Union is an 'economic failure' and Britain would be richer if it left, a group of leading economists said yesterday.

They claimed EU membership was holding back growth and branded the euro an 'unmitigated disaster'.

Every worker in the UK would be £40 a week better off a decade after Brexit and the economy would be 4 percent bigger than if the UK stayed in the EU, the economists claimed.

The findings are a direct challenge to George Osborn's claims the the economy would be 6.2 percent smaller by 2030 if Britain votes

TO LEAVE

in the

REFERENDUM

ON JUNE 23 - 2016

Professor Patrick Minford, a former adviser to Margaret Thatcher and one of the authors of yesterday's report branded the Treasury's analysis

'as a totally misleading piece of

PROPAGANDA'

He said it was 'based on almost no proper economic thought and does not stand up to any kind of scrutiny,'

Rather than delivering a Brexit tax'-as claimed by the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) this week - the report argued leaving the EU

would result in a

 BREXIT DIVIDEND

The 'Economists for Brexit' report said output would be higher and wage growth stronger if Britain

LEFT THE EU.

It added that the 'City of London' would continue to THRIVE.

'A  lot of economic nonsense has been talked so far in the Brexit  debate,. 'Most of it has come from the PROJECT FEAR campaign launched by Downing Street.'

Professor Minford, who set up the self-funded eight-man group to challenge the 'consensus' view of the Treasury and international Monetary Fund, said the boost would come from reduced RED TAPE strangling British businesses and a move away from the  the

PROTECTIONIST TRADING UNION'

of the EU towards

FREE TRADE

'Brexit is a shock-a good shock,' he said.

*

Full article

April 29-2016

 

 

 

'The Longest Day'
D-DAY, 6th June 1944.

WHAT WE SAID ON 6TH JUNE 2004
 

To some of us it seems only yesterday when those countless warriors for Freedom left our shores to fight to Free the peoples of a war torn Europe.

Many of those taking part were from the other parts of the English Speaking World the Commonwealth and other nation states that joined the Free World to fight the tripartite evil of State Dominance of Peoples, which is shortly again to be upon us in the form of the new European Constitution.

For those returning to the battle fields of Europe it must be in their minds as to how after all that had taken place 60 years ago that the one Nation that faced the terror almost alone -a unique Democracy an example to the world from which seed of Freedom rose, those Free Independent Nations States throughout the world during the past three centuries, is now fighting for its survival from traitors within.

Today our nation is now itself in peril from a doctrine alien to its nature but well known across our moat of history for it's emphasis on order by the State rather than our centuries old lesson that the State is our servant - not our master.

There is an awakening taking place of the dangers to our way-of-life but whether it will be in time to save us in the short time we remain a truly Free Nation State only the People can decide.

On June 6th 2004 all our thoughts will be with those who lost loved ones and those that suffered at home and abroad to bring Peace and Prosperity back to a war weary world.

May we escape the present evil, which threatens to enslave our People and Country- God Save Our Queen!

May God save our Queen and our Country?

6th June-2004

*

WE ASK! IN JUNE 2015 WHAT HAVE YOU DONE! TO PREVENT OUR UNIQUE 1000 YEAR PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY AND ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE FROM BECOMING A REGION OF THE 1943 NAZI-PLANNED EUROPEAN UNION?

THE GREATER NUMBER OF YOU!

DID

ABSOLUTELY

NOTHING!

 

6th June,2015

*

 

Added January 2016*

Unfortunately the QUEEN failed to RESIGN rather than  DISHONOUR HER SACRED CORONATION OATH  which should  have protected our Ancient Law-Custom and Constitution - now subservient to the 1942 Nazi-planned domination of EUROPE under its true colours as a COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC

EUROPEAN UNION


H.F.667

A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

 
 
 How should we respond to the Tory EU-turn?

by

STUART WHEELER

(Financial Supporter of UKIP)

[The following article appeared in FREEDOM TODAY-Autumn 2009 and much of what was said then is applicable to the present. It is an extensive work which we will separate into parts and give our view in our accustomed brackets]

PART ONE

 

[ A TALE OF TOO MANY LIES.]

 

Mr Wheeler states:

Now that David Cameron's 'cast iron guarantee' that any government headed by him would offer  the people a referendum on Lisbon has melted away, what should we do? What  should Eurosceptics, whatever party they are in, try to do next.

[The question asked above is the very reason why the Eurosceptic have failed to make any real progress over 40 years because many of them put PARTY before COUNTRY and accepted the many BRIBES and PROMISES offered.  What we have called for many years  is for ALL EUROSCEPTIC to VOTE for OUT-OF EU parties particularly the largest UKIP which we have recently  heard is a CONSERVATIVE PARTY creation to CONTROL and PREVENT any meaningful PROGRESS in obtaining seats in Westminster of which they have been MOST SUCCESSFUL.]

 

Mr Wheeler states:

The first  thing we should do is not give up.

 The  secret of Brussels' success is its unwillingness to take NO! for an answer and it is not just us they do not listen to.

DANISH voters,

 IRISH voters,

 DUTCH voters

FRENCH voters-

 in the eyes of the EUROPEAN UNION.

THEY ARE ALL THE SAME:

equally incapable of saying

NO!

and being believed.

Thanks to  David Cameron, it seems as if we shall not even get the chance to be ignored. But this is the first place where

EUROSCEPTICS NEED TO STAND AND FIGHT!

[We remind you once again this message was given in the Autumn of 2009 and since then we all know what a dismal showing the Conservative party made at the last election and their choice of the LIBDEMS as partners all because they would not keep their many promises to have a REFERENDUM.

We have recently been promised a REFERENDUM in 2017 but first we must vote them back into OFFICE in May 2015 is akin to reaction of the voter to the offer of £50 off one's energy and water bill of over £1500+. It brings back to mind the 25p increase in pensions another insulting offer particularly as MPs have now been awarded a further £7000 in their salary. As we have said for many years MPS should ONLY serve ONE TERM-it should NOT be a JOB for LIFE. This will enable many more people from all walks of life TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY.]

 

Mr Wheeler states:

We need to demand that the referendum on LISBON all three parties promised us is actually granted, and it needs to be a referendum on LISBON, and not on some tactical diversion, because unless EUROSCEPTICS insist, after all the fuss, on a LISBON REFERENDUM, it will look as if we have given up.

[Well one has only to hear the recent comments of David Cameron in 2013 to have confirmation that there is NO CHANGE on this ISSUE whatsoever. Our solution as mentioned above is for

 PATRIOTS NOT TO VOTE

 for the

 TRAITOROUS

GANG OF THREE

in

WESTMINSTER.]

 

What follows by Mr Wheeler is more reference to LISBON and unless we make a fuss it will look as if we have given up.

 Mr Wheeler further comments 'Whatever else has recently fuelled the crisis in the reputation of both Parliament and individual MPS, one issue predates everything else: the unwillingness of the British political class to BE HONEST OVER EUROPE.

... However for David Cameron in particular, there are practical political matters he needs to consider very closely.  Even in the depths of the worst recession since the Great Depression, facing a government headed by one of the least media savvy Prime Ministers in recent history, Mr Cameron's Conservatives struggle to establish a consistent opinion poll lead, enough to get an overall majority.  The electoral system rewards Labour's distribution of support and penalises Conservative votes, and there remains for the Tories the problem that

UKIP

quite legitimately appeals to their core supporters who are highly upset by the abandonment of 'cast-iron guarantees'.

[As we have  already indicated above this is the very reason WHY! the Conservative Party launched such a party in order that they could CONTROL it up to today in December 2013 to ensure its TOTAL FAILURE to get SEATS in the Palace of Westminster which is where IT REALLY COUNTS not in BRUSSELS which is NOTHING MORE THAN A TALKING SHOP.  Of course more seats in BRUSSELS  brings more awareness amongst voters in general of the real nature COLLECTIVIST SOVIETISED GODLESS AND COSTLY and undemocratic EUROPEAN UNION.  

REMEMBER!

If you wish to regain your once

 FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

DON'T VOTE FOR THE

 GANG OF THREE

 IN WESTMINSTER

VOTE

UKIP

BUT MAKE SURE THERE ARE NO DEALS WITH THE CON PARTY.]

TO BE CONTINUED

[COMMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTING AND CAPS ARE OURS!

 

  DECEMBER-2013

 

HF 100

 

EU QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

There are over 1000 Bulletins on the EU in our

BULLETIN FILE and

EU FILE

JUST A FEW OF OUR OVER A THOUSAND BULLETINS ON ENGLAND AND WHAT MATTERS!

 

ENGLAND MATTERS!

 SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL

DEATH OF A GIANT-A DAY TO REMEMBER

ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE by ENOCK POWELL. - [23rd April]

ST GEORGE`S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARES' BIRTHDAY  [23rd April]

SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS

Thoughts on St. George’s Day –Who are the English? - Part 1.

Thoughts on St. George’s Day –Who are the English? - Part 2

Our basic Liberties and Freedoms – to be surrendered to a Foreign Power? - Part I

Our basic Liberties and Freedoms - to be surrendered to a Foreign Power? - Part II

TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANAYSIS By NORRIS McWHIRTER - Least We Forget.

Why can’t we have the right to be English? - Part 1

Why can’t we have the right to be English? - Part 2

DON'T LET THEM LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY.

10 Reasons of how to destroy - our Nation.

 Petition to the Queen

So You Thought You Were Free- By Vernon Coleman

Could England Survive Outside The EU? -YES!

Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’

DON'T LET THEM LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY.

A Voice from 1962 about the Common Market.

Democracy without Morality and respect for Individuality is Despotism..

 A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 1.

A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 2.

 A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 3.

Why our English Self-Government is unique in Europe and the World.

 Almost everything, which is most precious in our Civilisation, has come from small States - Part 1

Almost everything, which is most precious in our Civilisation, has come from small States - Part 2

Our Past is embedded in our national consciousness-It asks were we came from and who we are.

Why Members of Parliament must be restricted to one term of office to protect their Independence.

 Marriage is when two people become one. Cohabitation is when two people remain two.

 Canterbury Cathedral is not just a building, nor even just a cathedral. It is England in stone.

A STORY OF SACRIFICE-THE SPITFIRE -ITS DESIGNER R.J.MITCHELL-A SAVIOUR OF THE SKIES OVER ENGLAND.

THE BILL THAT COULD TURN THIS COUNTRY INTO A DICTATORSHIP

 'There'll always Be an ENGLAND' -NOT any MORE

You Can't Seperate Politics and Morals.

ENGLAND is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in BLAIR's  POLITICALLY -CORRECT ENGLAND

SAVE YOUR ENGLAND-SAY NO TO THE EU REGIONS 

WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT.
PT I

‘I say we must not join Europe’-
Field Marshall Viscount Montgomery.

OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?

THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING -A CONSPIRACY to prevent the TRUTH emerging about Corruption and Treason in our country TODAY.

THE END OF THE ENGLISH-IF YOU LET IT!

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

MULTICULTURALISM HAS BETRAYED ENGLISH CULTURE SAYS ARCHBISHOP OF YORK

ENGLAND is ALREADY SECOND ONLY to HOLLAND as the MOST CROWDED COUNTRY IN EUROPE

ENGLISH FREEDOM - WHY IT IS YOURS?
SAY 'NO' TO THE EU

CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP

Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.

GOVERNMENT BY CONSENT BY JOHN GOURIET

 WHY WE NEED A PASSPORT TO FREEDOM

A Champion of Individualism from the late 19th century exposes the fallacies in collectivism and central planning.

 

AND MUCH MORE!

H.F.587/B
 

SEE HOW THE USA/ISRAELI ONGOING DESTABILISATION PLAN FOR FRAGMENTING  ARAB STATES IN THE MIDDLE EAST HAS BROUGHT RUSSIA INTO THE CONFLICT TO PROTECT SYRIA AND OTHER  NAMED NATION STATES.

 

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=122924

[WITH DAVID CAMERON A CLOSE FRIEND OF ISRAEL AND THE USA THE PLAN WOULD BE NO SURPRISE TO HIM. NO WONDER HE HAS TRIED SO HARD TO GET COMMONS APPROVAL FOR A WAR IN SYRIA. WITH OUR INTERVENTION IN IRAQ-LIBYA AND ELSEWHERE  IN THE MIDDLE EAST THE INNOCENT BRITISH PEOPLE HAVE BEEN PARTY TO THIS DEVIOUS AND DANGEROUS DECEIT. OH! WE ALMOST FORGOT TO TELL YOU THAT ISIS -  IS THE BRAIN CHILD OF DAVE'S CLOSE FRIEND ACROSS THE ATLANTIC

WHO ENSURES THAT ARMS SHIPMENTS SOMEHOW REACH THEIR TARGET  .]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

OCTOBER 14-2015

H F.585

 

 

 
 

DAILY MAIL-

 

The shame of Britain sucking up to these barbaric Saudi gangsters

by

JOHN R BRADLEY

 

The plight of 74-year-old British
expatriate Karl Andree — facing 350 lashes in Saudi Arabia — shines ...

EXTRACT

 

...Terror

...This ,of course, is the ruling house that is threatening to lash a British a British grandfather half to death for allegedly making a few bottles of his own wine.

 All of which begs the question: why have we put up with these gangster royals for so long?

Back in the Twenties, we put  Ibn Saud who would found the kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932, on the British payroll . We even used RAF planes to help him put down local rebellions.

Almost a century on, our political elite are still unable to shake off their imperialist mindset [Well! -its the money you know -Billions of it.] -the idea, now utterly outdated, that we still have an important strategic role to play in the region.

...Sordid

Increasingly, however, there are dissenting voices. As Mr Cameron drafted his missive yesterday about Karl Andree, Justice Secretary Michael Gove forced the Government to cancel a £5.9million contract to provide training to the Saudi prison system (in which Mr Andree is languishing)

This should mark only the beginning of a radical reassessment of the sordid British-Saudi relationship.

Significantly, the Saudi royal family is more vulnerable than ever. It has launched a costly war in neighbouring Yemen, where it is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood-dominated rebels against separatist forces.

Its efforts ton install an Islamist proxy government in Syria have  been scuppered by Russia's dramatic intervention in support of Putin's ally Assad.

And all the while, a dramatic fall in oil prices has forced massive cutbacks in Saudi domestic spending.

Rumours swirl of an impending coup within the royal court, and King Salman is reportedly on his deathbed.

In these circumstances, Britain has considerable leverage, and we should make it perfectly clear from now on that the Saudi do not have us pinned over a barrel. [Nicely put!]

The kingdom that floats on oil is drowning in hypocrisuy and barbarity, and it is time we stopped prostrating ourselves before its reprehensible rulers.

JOHN R. BRADLEY'S four books on the Middle East include Saudi Arabia Exposed: Inside A Kingdom in Crisis.

 

Full article Here!

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

OCTOBER 14-2015

H F 584

 
 

 

 

LEADERSHIP

 OF THE

OUT-OF-EU

MOVEMENT.

 

 

WE HAVE BEEN FOR YEARS CALLING FOR A

 

UNITED

OUT-OF-THE -EU MOVEMENT

 HEADED BY A  FORTHRIGHT AND

 

PATRIOTIC GENERAL...

 

TO INSTIL DISCIPLINE AND ORDER TO ENSURE THE CORRECT MESSAGE IS FOLLOWED BY ALL CONCERNED.

 

WE CERTAINLY DO NOT BELIEVE THAT A SUITABLE LEADER IS ONE WHO SAYS HE WILL RESIGN IF HE DOES NOT ACHIEVE HIS OBJECTIVE AS THE MAN WITH 20 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN THE CITY OF LONDON. AND THE LATEST REVELATIONS REVEALING THAT THE CON PARTY HAVE BEEN THE UNSEEN HAND DIRECTING UKIP POLICY IN ORDER TO ENSURE THEY NEVER SUCCEED IN THEIR PATRIOTIC  PURPOSE  WHICH WE HAVE SUSPECTED FOR MANY A YEAR.

 

THE CORRECT ATTITUDE TO WHAT MUST BE THE GREATEST QUESTION IN THE LIFE OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE AND THOSE OF OTHER LOVERS OF FREEDOM WHO HAVE INFUSED OUR NATION STATE OVER A THOUSAND YEARS AND  THE INSPIRATION OF OUR GREAT WAR LEADERS SUCH AS WILLIAM PITT-LORD CHATHAM WHO STATED IN  NOVEMBER 1777:

 

'If I were an American, as I am an Englishman, while a foreign troop was landed in my country, I never would lay down my arms-never-never-never!

 

HIS SON WILLIAM PITT THE YOUNGER ALSO PRIME MINISTER STATED IN NOVEMBER 1805 AFTER

NELSON'S

GREAT NAVAL VICTORY AT TRAFALGAR

 

 

WHICH SAVED ENGLAND  AND EUROPE FROM ANOTHER DICTATOR WHO WISHED FOR A

EUROPEAN UNION AND AGAIN ENGLAND AFTER TWO WORLD WARS IN THE 20TH CENTURY FIGHTING THE SAME FOE IN THE 21ST CENTURY ALBEIT NOT ON A BLOODY BATTLEFIELD WE ARE ,NON-THE-LESS, FIGHTING A BATTLE FOR THE SAME REASON TO PRESERVE OUR INHERITED AND WELL- ESTABLISHED RIGHT TO REGAIN OUR FREEDOM WITHIN OUR ACCUSTOMED FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

THE TASK  BEFORE HER IN OUR OWN TIME  IS TO ENSURE AN ENGLISH EXIT FROM THE NAZI-PLANNED COLLECTIVIST AND UNDEMOCRATIC EU TO ENABLE US ALL TO AGREE THAT:

 

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust , save  Europe.'

 

*

 

IN OUR OWN TIME THOSE WHO WITNESSED THE HEROIC ACTION OF THE

'FEW'

AND THE GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL WHO EMBODIED THE TRUE FEELINGS OF THE PEOPLE TO REMAIN A FREE PEOPLE IN A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE AND HIS MEMORABLE WORDS WHEN WE FACED AN INVASION  FROM THE VERY SAME ARCHITECTS OF THE NAZI -PLANNED COLLECTIVIST -UNDEMOCRATIC EU

 

'We shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing -grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.'-

Winston Churchill ( June -1940)

 

WE WON THE WAR BUT WE LATER LOST THE PEACE IN 1972 WHEN PARLIAMENT IN THE HANDS OF THE CON PARTY VOTED TO JOIN WHAT WAS  A

 

'BIG LIE'

 

AND MOST OF YOU WILL KNOW WHAT HITLER ADMIRED

 ABOUT THIS NATURAL ONE-UPMANSHIP OVER DOZY UNINTERESTED CITIZENS WHO CAN'T

 

'SEE THE WOOD FOR THE TREES'

 

OR

IN PLAIN LANGUAGE ACCEPTED THE PARTY BRIBES RATHER THAN DEFEND THEIR WORLD ACCLAIMED CONSTITUTION

 of the

"RIGHTS of ENGLISHMAN".

 

*

ROLE OF HONOUR

 

SINCE THEN THERE HAVE BEEN MANY WARNINGS FROM ACROSS OUR SOCIETY WHO HAVE WARNED ABOUT THE DIRE CONSEQUENCES OF BEING WITHIN THE SO-CALLED EEC BUT REALLY THE 'CLOSER UNION'  A POLITICAL EU. ONE OF THE MOST ARDENT CRITICS WAS THE LABOUR PEER LORD (PETER) SHORE WHO STATED HIS VIEW IN:

 

'Almost everything, which is most precious in our Civilisation has come from small States.'

 

ALSO

 

EMPIRES HAVE GONE AND MOST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD NOW LIVE IN [ INDEPENDENT NATION STATES by  LABOUR PEER

LORD SHORE

 

*

 

A Speaker of the House of Commons no less has added his  fears to the loss of

 

'NATIONHOOD'

 

*

 

A Greek scholar

and eurosceptic politician BRAVELY forewarned of the dangerous demographic changes that would occur in the future-

BUT FEW WOULD

 LISTEN.

 

*

IT TOOK

General De Gaulle in 1960

 LEADER OF A CLOSE WAR ALLY IN TWO WORLD WARS TO FULLY APPRECIATE WHY ENGLAND COULD NOT  EMBRACE THE EU

  

*

 

We have Harold Wilson in 1961

-To consider the Common market in simple black and white terms?

*

And among the millions of patriots who have been fighting  for decades in their own way we mention a

 'FEW'

such as those great patriots no longer with us

BUT THEIR INSPIRATION AND WORKS WILL NEVER DIE WHILE THERE IS AN

ENGLAND

 

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 

AND

 

 ROSS and NORRIS McWHIRTER

JOHN GOURIET

TONY BENN

EDWARD HEATHCOAT AMORY

 

AND MANY OTHER

defenders

of the

 

ENGLISH CONSTITUTUION

*

POLICY

 

  THERE NEEDS TO BE A CONCERTED AND COMBINED APPROACH WITH A MESSAGE WHICH EMBRACES ALL VIEWS AS THE WEAKEST BUT MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IS BUTTRESSED IN DEBATE WITH OTHERS OF AN ECONOMICAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC NATURE. AS A  PATRIOT AND  A DONOR TO THE CAUSE OF A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

  

WITH THE

 

'WORLD ITS OYSTER'

  

AS WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AND PROVED BY OUR PEOPLE -A GERMANIC TRIBE

THAT LOVED

 INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM AND UNITY

 SINCE THEY LANDED IN A LAND, LATER TO BE NAMED ENGLAND

 

*

OF COURSE THERE ARE MANY PATRIOTS TODAY WHO ARE FIGHTING THE GOOD FIGHT WITH WORDS AND TRUTH AND MANY ALSO WITH

ACTION!  

THE LIST OF NAMES WOULD BE TOO LONG EVEN FOR THE SPACE AVAILABLE. BUT OUR WORK IS GREATLY HELPED BY THOSE WE  MENTION BELOW-AND A VIEW OF OUR OVER 2000 BULLETINS SINCE 2003 WILL SHOW MANY MANY OTHERS:

  

VERNON COLEMAN

 

DAVID  BROWN

 

HARRY BECKHOUGH

 

BERNARD CONNOLLY

 

RODNEY ATKINSON

 

 

eutruth.org.uk

AND MANY MANY OTHERS.   

 

( T B C)

AND MANY CORRESPONDENTS AND WRITERS FROM ARTICLES-BOOKS AND NEWSPAPERS PARTICULARLY THE

 

DAILY MAIL

ENGLAND

IS ALREADY SECOND ONLY TO HOLLAND AS THE MOST CROWDED COUNTRY IN EUROPE

(JUNE 2006)

ONLY CHANGE IN 2015 IS THAT

 ENGLAND

IS NOW

MUCH MORE CROWDED.

 *

 AS EXPECTED DAVID CAMERON IS TRYING TO REPEAT THE UNDEMOCRATIC TACTICS USED IN THE 1975 REFERENDUM AND BY HIS FRIENDS IN THE  HIERARCHY OF UNDEMOCRATIC EU.  

BUT THIS TIME HIS OPPONENTS ARE NOW MORE ALERT!

TO THE USUAL GROSS LIES AND DECEIT.

 

[1SEPTEMBER 2015 ]

WE ARE MORE AWARE THAT DAVID CAMERON'S CLOSE ARRANGEMENT WITH SAUDI ARABIA HAS  HAS BROUGHT MUCH WEALTH TO ENGLAND BUT AT A GREAT COST TO OUR IDEALS AND THE DISTURBING DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES IN OUR COUNTRY WITH GROWING NUMBERS OF THOSE OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH IN MANY OF OUR TOWNS AND CITIES WITH THEIR SHARIA LAW WITH THE GREATER NUMBER NEVER TO BE ASSIMILATED INTO OUR SOCIETY. THE RICH AND BIG BUSINESS IN GENERAL CONSIDER WEALTH AND POWER BEFORE COUNTRY AS IT HAS PROVED FOR WELL OVER 300 YEARS.

THE

 PEOPLE COME FIRST! NOT SECOND - TO ANYONE OR ANYTHING. THAT IS WHAT DEMOCRACY MEANS

 'Democracy is on trial in the world on a colossal scale than ever before.'

 [The spirit of Democracy-Charles Fletcher Dole-1843-1927.

AS IT IS TODAY

ON

[OCTOBER 13- 2015 ]

  

H F 583

 

 

EUROPEAN UNION Q & A

1 EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10] VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]     100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007]

33]    BLAIR'S LAST TREACHEROUS ACT. THE 60,000 DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHAT WILL MR BROWN DO?-JUNE-2007]

34]   GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

35]  HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

36]  SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS
 

37]   NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007-CLOSER TO YOUR HOME THAN YOU THINK  

38]    A WARNING FROM JAN-2005-TO PRESERVE THE NATION-STATES OF EUROPE-VOTE 'NO' TO THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION (D.T.)

49]    SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU. (D.M.)

 

[For hundreds of bulletins about the EU]

HOME

 

 

A PEOPLE WHO IGNORE THE PAST HAVE NO FUTURE

 

THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL

*

Death knell for the euro (and the crisis that could EVEN DESTROY the EU)

by

Christopher Booker

 

WOMEN GETS CRIMINAL RECORD FOR SELLING FRUIT AND VEG BY THE POUND

 

DEFENCE OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

THEIR FREEDOMS & LIBERTIES

 
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND
Ten

EU truths we must tell the public
 

-NO MATTER THAT CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH HER MAJESTY

WASTED NO TIME IN SELLING THE

the accustomed

"RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN"

 

GERMAN CHANCELLOR PUTS GERMANY FIRST-

GORDON BROWN PUTS THE EU

FIRST.

 

SEVENTY YEARS AGO NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN SIGNED THE NOTORIOUS MUNICH AGREEMENT TO BETRAY CZECHOSLOVAKIA AND DELIVER

' PEACE IN OUR TIME'

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN
WANT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM AND COUNTRY- THEN READ ON

The remarkable views of Declan Ganley

The multi-millionaire founder of

www.Libertas.org

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE . 

What a colossal con trick they have played on the people of the once INDEPENDENT NATION STATES of the Island of BRITAIN.

LATEST!

eurofacts:-5th September,2008

Hurrah for Libertas!

FOR IRISH EU

'NO' VOTE
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

STATEMENT!

IS THE FOUNDER OF LIBERTAS WHO LED OPPOSITION TO LISBON A FEDERALIST EUROPEAN NOT A EUROSCEPTIC?

eurofacts 19th September, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE . 

EU FAILS TO SIGN-OFF ACCOUNTS FOR 14TH YEAR RUNNING

WHAT DOES GORDON BROWN DO?-NOTHING!
There are certain Principles of Civil Liberty, which at the end of the fifteenth century protected the Individual from the arbitrary action of the government.

DAVID CAMERON NOW GIVES FIRM PROMISE OF EU REFERENDUM -CAN WE TRUST HIM?

Regrettably the answer is NO!

But after much obfuscation and stating his decision to stand down at end of term he relented in 2016
SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

CIVIL WAR

[Extract taken from Mr David Brown's book above]

[ALSO see below for THE END OF THE ENGLISH.

 

SLY OLD FOX-ARCHITECT OF EU CONSTITUTION - SUGGESTS SPECIAL TERMS FOR BRITAIN.

DON'T TRUST THEM

POLITICAL COURAGE IS NOT AMONG THE QUEEN'S MANY VIRTUES.[The Queen could have at the least privately insisted that HER MINISTERS give HER once FREE SUBJECTS a REFERENDUM or NO EU TREATY

SHE DID NOTHING!

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

 

 

 

1418/2

 

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE .

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

 is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 
 

A WORLD AT WAR!

 

Silence! makes War possible -Knowledge and Action might Avert It.


OCTOBER-2015

 

 

 

 

 

H.F582

 
 
 
 
 
 
     

CLICK EACH ITEM TO VIEW

< IT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE!  - LABOUR AND TORY MPS UNITE TO DEVISE PLOT FOR BRITAIN TO LEAVE EU‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’            OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO AND TORY MPS UNITE TO DEVISE PLOT FOR BRITAIN TO DESTROY IT?         OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP              OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?              LIBERTIES OF PARLIAMENT-BIRTHRIGHT OF SUBJECTS OF ENGLAND.               COULD ENGLAND SURVIVE OUTSIDE THE EU-YES!               ON THE EURO - MAX + HASTINGS - SORRY I WAS WRONG!             TORY MPS DEMAND REFERENDUM ON EUROPE -   IN MAY 2016- MAX HASTINGS-THIS IS WHY I'M NOT VOTING FOR BREXIT .

CLICK EACH ITEM TO VIEW

     
 
 
 
 
 

A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

IN

2013

 and again in

 2014&2015&2016

[At another time of loss of faith and great unrest in our world a message from 1943 while our country and others were years into the battle to FREE EUROPE from TOTALITARIAN STATES we are in December 2013 facing the rise of HITLER'S DREAM of that year of a EUROPEAN UNION from SPAIN to the URALS. The writer of the following work had suggested that after the war there should be a EUROPEAN FEDERATION but alongside of ENGLAND and HER NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES with the COMMONWEALTH as a separate sphere of influence in the World together with the NEW WORLD-the USA and others in the world at large. With the growing realisation that since that time there has been a continuing advance of the  SECULAR as opposed to the SPIRITUAL cement of SOCIETY and its tragic consequences for our country and the rest of MANKIND.]

 

' We have seen European civilisations owed its origin neither to racial unity nor to political organisations but to the spiritual forces which united Romans and barbarians in the new society of Christendom.  but that society was not limited in principle to the particular society of peoples of which it was actually composed.  It was in principle a universal society, based on the unity and brotherhood of mankind and corresponding on the temporal plane to the new idea of humanity which transcended all divisions of race and class,

"in which there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcised nor uncircumcised, barbarian not Scythian, bond or free, but Christ is all and in all."

If this faith is still alive in the world today [1943-and we can ask the same question in December 2013 and again in 2014 and in May 2016] it is no less valid as a spiritual basis of world order , as it was in the past for the making of Europe; in fact, it is only in a world order that the Christian social idea of spiritual universalism and the world vocation of Christianity have formed the background of Christian social ethics.

 [Not the ILLUMINATI /NEW WORLD ORDER /BANKSTERS which have existed for thousands of years but the present particular SATANIC ORDER which had its origins in Bavaria over 200 hundred years ago] 

  Thus Christians have a twofold responsibility and mission in the present crisis.  In the first place they are the heirs of the old European tradition and the guardian of the spiritual principle from which Europe derived its being.

There is nothing in the European past that has not been formed or conditioned by Christian influences, and even the heresiarchs and revolutionaries are not excepted since they have often been inspired by an exaggerated and one-sided devotion to some particular element in the common tradition.  And in the second place Christians have a new responsibility and mission to the new world society that Europe has created in spite of itself by its scientific achievements and its colonial and economic expansion.  This world society is still formless, a chaos in which the forces of destruction [even in 2013 and in 2014 and in 2016] alone seem active.  It does not possess in itself any principle of order or spiritual power which is capable of giving organic form or unity.  Any attempt to organise the world by military or economic power divorced from spiritual vision is doomed to failure, because it ignores the deepest and most vital factors in the problem and if these psychological and spiritual forces are neglected they are apt to reassert themselves in a destructive and passionate revolt such as that which destroyed the Weimer republic and the international system of the League of Nations.

It is therefore impossible to dismiss the claims of Christianity as irrelevant to the problem of international order, for the demonic powers which have entered the empty house of secular civilisations are not to be exorcised by the economist or the politician: religion is the only power that can meet the forces of destruction on equal terms and save mankind from its spiritual enemies.

The world mission of Christianity is based on its conception of a spiritual society which transcends all states and cultures and is the final gaol of humanity.  Wherever Christianity exists there survives a seed of unity, a principle of spiritual order, which cannot be destroyed by war or the conflict of economic interests or the failure of political organisation.  No doubt it will be said that the Christian Church does not in fact perform this function and that Christians are too few, too weak and too poor in intellectual and spiritual qualities to influence the course of history.  But the same might have been  said of the  Jews in the age of the prophets or of the Christians themselves under the Roman Empire.

" You see your vocation, brethren," wrote St. Paul, " that not many wise men according to the flesh, not many of the powerful, not many of the noble called." It is  of the very nature of Christianity not to depend on human means, not to trust in " the arm of the flesh," not to judge events by human or secular standards. The one thing that it demands is faith, and lack of FAITH is the only thing that can DEFEAT the DIVINE PURPOSE.

[CHRISTOPHER DAWSON=The Judgment of Nations-1943]

ADDED-NOVEMBER-2014

[Individuality is a Christian concept of a thoughtful responsible caring human being and is not to liking of those with ambitions of POWER who wish to enslave their PEOPLE!   In order to achieve this satanic plan, politicians in many countries with a Christian ethic, have chosen to disregard their inheritance ,in order to obtain greater control of their population and that is WHY!  in Europe the Nazi-inspired plan of 194O's - of a COLLECTIVE-SOVIETISED-SATANIC-UNDEMOCRATIC EUROPEAN UNION which came into being with the Treaty of Rome in 1957.  And in 1972, against the advice of the Lord Chancellor Lord Kilmuir, the then prime minister Edward Heath lied to the PEOPLE! as he admitted just before his death in 2005, when it was also revealed, that he had been a Nazi Spy  for over 60 years, as in 1938 he and others in Balliol College Oxford Spy-ring, were reported to MI5 by the Master of Balliol College  Oxford -Mr A. D. LINDSAY, LL. D.]

 

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER-2013 and again in 2014 and in May 2016

HF 101

 
A WARNING FROM 1998 OF THE THREAT TO THE INHERITED

'FREEDOMS AND LIBERTIES'

 OF

ENGLISHMEN

 

Now, Mr Hague, just say 'NEVER'

[A REMINDER!]

 On 5 January,1998, just as the working new year was beginning, Lord Howe of Aberavon, Edward Heath, [Bilderberger],Michael Heseltine. Kenneth Clark[Bilderberger and Nazi Spy for over 60 years] and eight other senior Conservative Euro-federalists published a letter in The Independent.   This letter declared their support for what they commended as the Prime Minister's positive approach to Euro-negotiations expressed their enthusiastic support for joining the common Euro-currency and promised that they would all be active campaigners for a

'YES' vote in the eventual referendum

The letter was of course seen as an embarrassing challenge to the leader of the Conservative Party, of which those letter writers apparently intend to continue their membership.  A challenge it certainly is.  But it ought to be seen, and taken, as an opportunity to change the policy which those letter writers have now so strongly and so publicly challenged.

Misguided policy

   That policy, as stated by the leader, was to say 'no' only to joining the common Eurocurrency during either the present parliament or the next; leaving open the possibility of our joining after that.  But this temporizing policy was, we must hope, adopted only to regain the support of the signers of that LETTER and their LIKE.  In that misguided aim IT HAS FAILED, quite dramatically.  So William Hague [Yes! you are right!- he is the FOREIGN SECRETARY in 2014] should now feel free to abandon his appeasement of the unappeasable.  INSTEAD he ought categorically, absolutely and permanently to REJECT the very idea of the UK abandoning its OWN CURRENCY.  He should on this SUPREME ISSUE complement Lady Thatcher's

'NO' 'NO' 'NO'

For the project for a common Eurocurrency is not, and should not be judged as being, a purely or even mainly ECONOMIC PROJECT.  Instead, as everyone who wants to know already knows, it is, and by its CONTINENTAL SPONSORS and CONTROLLERS is advocated as being, the MAJOR, the IRREVERSIBLE STEP, which will make inevitable the establishment of a single common government for the emerging

UNITED STATES of EUROPE.

To take this step, is therefore simultaneously to ABANDON both HOME RULE and NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE

[As we have found today in 2014 after the traitorous signing of the LISBON TREATY by Gordon Brown a few years ago.]

Anxious pretence

The reason why most Euro-federalists in the UK both DENY that THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE and PRETEND that JOINING or NOT JOINING the common EURO-currency is simply and solely a matter of the balance of economic advantage and disadvantage, is that they are not confident that they could persuade even the YOUNGER BRITISH GENERATIONS to take THE STEP of JOINING if their eyes were OPENED to WHAT and ALL that THIS STEP would ACTUALLY HOLD.  And the EURO-FEDERALISTS apparently SUFFER this ANXIETY despite ALL the efforts of TRENDY TEACHERS to ensure that their pupils lack any of the knowledge of BRITISH HISTORY.

There are relevant quotations from two GREAT PRIME MINISTERS of EARLIER CENTURIES. The first comes from a speech made by a TORY. William Pitt, the younger, on 31st May 1781. In it he said, of and to MEMBERS of the HOUSE of COMMONS, that they:

"...hold all the strings of the NATIONAL PURSE, and are ENTRUSTED with the GREAT IMPORTANT POWER, FIRST of GRANTING THE MONEY, and then of CORRECTING the EXPENDITURE.  To DELEGATE this RIGHT, then is a VIOLATION of what gives them THEIR CONSEQUENCE in the LEGISLATURE, and what, above all other PRIVILEGES, they CANNOT SURRENDER or DELEGATE without A VIOLENT BREACH of the CONSTITUTION."

The second quotation comes from a speech made at Hasting on 17th May 1891 by WILLIAM EWART GLADSTONE. (He was, of course, a classical LIBERAL, rather a modern LIBERAL or SOCIAL DEMOCRAT.) He said then:

" The FINANCE of the COUNTRY is ULTIMATELY ASSOCIATED with THE LIBERTIES of the COUNTRY.  It is a POWERFUL LEVERAGE by which ENGLISH LIBERTY has been GRADUALLY ACQUIRED... IF the HOUSE of COMMONS by ANY POSSIBILITY  LOSE the POWER of the CONTROL of the GRANTS of PUBLIC MONEY, depend upon it, YOUR VERY LIBERTY will be WORTH very LITTLE in COMPARISON, That POWERFUL LEVERAGE has been what is commonly known as THE POWER of the PURSE- the CONTROL of the HOUSE of COMMONS over EXPENDITURE.

Appalling prospect

Even those who may believe that our liberties are adequately safeguarded by the INCORPORATION of the EUROPEAN DECLARATION of HUMAN RIGHTS into UK LAW, and who are unworried by the constitutional impropriety of the successive delegations consequent upon the TREATIES of ROME, MAASTRICHT, and AMSTERDAM, ought to be appalled by the prospect of SURRENDERING ALL POWERS and PRIVILEGES of OUR NATIONAL PARLIAMENT to a EURO-FEDERAL PARLIAMENT IN which BRITISH MEPs of ALL PARTIES will ALWAYS BE A RELATIVELY TINY MAJORITY.

For our EU 'partners' already gain substantially from their exploitation of OUR FISHING GROUNDS, from our MEMBERSHIP of the COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY and from

 OUR [CONSIDERABLE) NET CONTRIBUTION to EU FUNDS (our tribute quota).

Coalition of collaborators.

So how else can we explain the eagerness of those 'partners' to involve the UK in their EURO-CURRENCY, and consequently to SUBORDINATE the UK to the COMMON EU GOVERNMENT, except what they must very reasonably see as a NATION of SUCKERS RULED by a defacto COALITION of COLLABORATORS?

[WE COULDN'T AGREE MORE!]

 

[REMEMBER AT THE EURO ELECTION IN MAY 2014 YOU HAVE THE LAST  CHANCE TO RETRIEVE YOUR RESPECT FOR YOUR CONSTITUTION-YOUR INHERITED FREEDOMS AND LIBERTIES-AND COUNTRY- BY VOTING FOR THOSE WHO WANT

OUT OF THE SOVIETISED COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

The usual level of voting at an EU ELECTION has been approximately 30% no doubt this reflects voters feelings about the issue and rightly so but on this occasion it is vitally important that the voter give the traitorous and wasteful GANG of THREE a LESSON in DEMOCRACY-The ENGLISH WAY.

WILL YOU AT LAST DO IT?

and soon to see the return of the

'FREEDOMS and LIBERTIES

of

ENGLISHMEN'.

*

[This article appeared in the Freedom Today in February 1998.  We ourselves stood as a candidate at the 1999 European Election and we have been fighting every day since to recover our lost freedoms and liberties and time has taken its toll and our future activity will be drastically reduced as a consequence-but the spirit fights on until we are again a FREE DEMOCRATIC INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.]

FEBRUARY 4-2014

IN MAY 2014 THE PEOPLE SPOKE AND THE GANG OF FOUR BECAME THE HUNTED GAME AND THEY BECAME TERRIFIED THAT IN MAY 2015 THEY WOULD FACE AN EVEN GREATER REVOLUTION TO BRING BACK FREEDOM AGAIN IN AN INDEPENDENT  NATION STATE  OF ENGLAND.         

HF 104

 
 
 
     
 

  IN SEPTEMBER-2011 - IT HAS HAPPENED MANY TIMES BEFORE!  - LABOUR AND TORY MPS UNITE TO DEVISE PLOT FOR BRITAIN TO LEAVE EU              ‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’             OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP              OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?              LIBERTIES OF PARLIAMENT-BIRTHRIGHT OF SUBJECTS OF ENGLAND.               COULD ENGLAND SURVIVE OUTSIDE THE EU-YES!               ON THE EURO-MAX+HASTINGS-SORRY I WAS WRONG!

 
     
 
 
A WARNING FROM 2003 OF THE GROWTH OF THE POLITICALLY-CORRECT ANTI-RACISM PLAGUE

WHICH HAS BEEN LET LOOSE WITHIN OUR SOCIETY.

The following article was taken from

 FREEDOM TODAY-APRIL/MAY 2003 

 and we

 have all witnessed in the words of the author ANTHONY HOYLE

'Our growth industry of the millennium is now anti-racism.  Its tentacles paralyze

our freedom of speech,... border controls, policing and justice.' 

Anthony Hoyle looks at the growth of the anti-racist hysteria and advocates more tolerance.

WHEN apartheid ended in South Africa, I remarked to the then editor of

FREEDOM TODAY

'that our own anti-racists would now look nearer home for targets. Little did I realise how spectacularly my forebodings would be vindicated.'

Now  [2003] South Africa has become respectable, and some people here are indeed finding different scapegoats.  Our growth industry of the millennium is now

ANTI-RACISM

Its tentacles paralyse our

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

BORDER CONTROLS

POLICING

AND

JUSTICE

Our political institutions and media are terrified by it.

Vulnerable groups reel under vague and unsubstantiated accusations of 'institutional' racism that

ATTACK THEIR THOUGHTS RATHER THAN THEIR ACTIONS.

Applied indiscriminately to anything from apartheid to "gentlemen prefer blondes racist motives are easy to smell out and leave the accused to disprove.  But prejudice is impossible to disprove; and its mere accusation is enough to terminate objective debate as everyone runs for shelter.

Although race discrimination is, if anything declining, why is there so much more anti-racist hysteria? What is the driving force behind all this

WITCH HUNTING?

Is it because there is no longer apartheid to condemn?

Psychology can offer an answer, in the familiar mental

process we see when people blame others for wha

is really their own worst failings: what psychologists

all a projection'.

Nothing novel here about that: I think there is some advice in the Bible about the beam in one's own eye. In more detail, people who become unconsciously aware of their own unworthy impulses or characteristics often refuse to allow them to reach conscious level (where they would feel very uncomfortable) and instead imagine that they can see them in others often some convenient group in whom they can condemn them and so feel virtuous instead of guilty.  An example is unreasoning hatred of 'blacks' a tempting group to stick a label on, as 'black' can also have a pejorative association with dirt or evil.

In the years when race hatred was becoming a problem, psychologists pointed out how it is motivated by projection.  The tyranny of illogical emotional anti racism clearly fits a similar mould . For although today's

POLITICALLY CORRECT

"PROGRESSIVES"

will excuse almost any crime, racism seems too dreadful for them even to acknowledge privately to

THEMSELVES.

They desperately need scapegoats for their own unwelcome racists instincts, so look for suitable people onto whom they can project them.

Anti racists with racist instincts?

Not as absurd as it sounds.  To reject or shun whatever seems alien is instinctive in humans indeed in most creatures.  We are all born with this characteristic. It is how we deal with it that

MATTERS.

A decent and tolerant man who recognises it as

normal and doesn't feel guilty might just think I'd prefer my daughter to marry a man like me, but I'II judge her friends by their characters not their colour; and I'll defend them against injustice"

A less tolerant man who is too ashamed of his instincts to admit them is strongly motivated to find others on whom to blame them. In extreme cases he may even become obsessive and anti racist. Such persons and their works in public life will spring readily to the readers mind.

Projecting racist feelings onto others is simply another side of the racist coin. It will not solve any problems but rather aggravate them.

A more general recognition of these unconscious processes might have saved our society many problems.

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IN GENERAL:

 

*

DAILY MAIL

--women-troops-sent-home-pregnant-MoD-wont-impose-war-zone-pregnancy-tests-privacy-fears.html

*

More!

*

The+growing+madness+of

+political+correctness+

and+its+out-of-control+

compensation+culture+which+undermines+

common+sence+values+

within+our+society.

*

[We alighted on this quotation as significant to our own time where we find that

many are on a continual exploration for a greater thrill to fill their lives instead of realising that a contented open  mind is all that is needed.]

'Society undergoes continual changes; it is barbarous, it is civilized, it is Christianized, it is rich, it is scientific; but this change is not amelioration.  For everything that is given something is taken. Society acquires new arts, and loses old instincts. The civilized man has built a coach, but has lost the use of his feet; he has a fine Geneva watch, but cannot tell the hour by the sun.

EMERSON.-Ralph Waldo-Am poet(1803-82)

*

[COMMENTS IN SQUARE BRACKETS AND HIGHLIGHTING TEXT ARE OURS]

MARCH 1-2014

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

 

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

 

 

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with Londonistan (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism. The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

Diversity in the UK

A ranking of social evils 

Multiculturalism and truth

Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

The aims of Localism

 

 

 

 

 H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

 

 

 
     
    IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!  -LATEST! - WHAT IS A EUROSCEPTIC? DAVID CAMERON AS A BILDERBERGER-YOU KNOW THIOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE SERVANTS OF THE WORLD GOVERNMENT CROWD WHO ARE DESTROYING NATION STATES AND HAVE AN AGENDA TO REDUCE THE WORLD POPULATION DOWN TO 500,000,000 -SO ANYTHING THAT DAVID CAMERON SAYS REGARDING EUROSCEPTICISM NEEDS TO BE TAKEN WITH A PINCH OF SALT OR PEPPER IF YOU WISH TO CLEAR YOUR TEARS AWAY.   IT IS A SUNNY SATURDAY MORNING AND HAVE OPENED THE DAILY MAIL TO SEE STEPHEN GLOVER'S ARTICLE 'Has Cameron now broken a second pledge on Europe' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1325008/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Has-David-Cameron-broken-SECOND-pledge-Europe.html

+ WE NOW HEAR ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 11,2010 IN CHRISTOPHER BOOKER'S ARTICLE IN THE DAILY MAIL SHOWN BELOW 'The ultimate surrender of Britain's sovereignty' - THE PROBLEM AS WE SEE IT IS THAT THOSE WHO HAVE FOR YEARS FOUGHT THE EUROSCEPTIC CAUSE REFUSE TO GET TO THE BASICS REGARDING THE TRUE STATE OF GOVERNANCE IN ENGLAND - WE LET THOSE FROM OUR SISTER NATIONS TO FIGHT THEIR OWN CAUSE. - THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS WELL KNOWN SUCH AS WHO REALLY RUNS OUR COUNTRY AND FOR THAT MATTER THE OLD COMMONWEALTH NATIONS - IT IS THE CITY OF LONDON HEADED BY OUR ONCE TRUE SOVEREIGN LORD -QUEEN ELIZABETH II - ASSISTED BY GEORGE OSBORNE-CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER -A BILDERBERGER A SERVANT OF THE ILLUMINATI - ROTHCHILD'S BANK OF ENGLAND.- WHY? OH! WHY -WON'T THOSE MANY DEFENDER'S OF ENGLISH FREEDOM STATE OUTRIGHT THAT THE BILDERBERGERS ARE TRAITORS AND SHOULD STAND TRIAL FOR TREASON?- YES! -YES! - WE KNOW THAT IN 1998 TONY BLAIR SECRETLY INSERTED A CLAUSE IN A BILL TO PROTECT HIMSELF AND EVERYONE ELSE INCLUDING THE ONCE QUEEN OF ENGLAND FROM A TREASON TRIAL. - WHAT WE ARE OBSERVING IS A LOT OF HOT AIR - A FIRM RESOLUTE DETERMINATION TO DO ANYTHING BUT STATE THE REAL OBVIOUS SITUATION WHICH FACES US - THE BILDERBERGERS ARE IN ALL THE POLITICAL PARTIES AT WESTMINSTER - THEY ARE SERVANTS OF ROTHCHILD'S BANK OF ENGLAND AND THE CITY OF LONDON - IT HAS BEEN THE SAME SINCE THE BANK WAS PRIVATISED AT THE END OF THE 17TH CENTURY - SEE 'CENTRAL BANKS!' - INTERNATIONAL BANKERS! IN OUR MULTI VIEW INDEX FILE BELOW. - STRONG TALK AND GRIPPING NEWS STORIES ARE USEFUL - BUT! IT WILL NOT REPLACE REALITY - TO FACE THE TRUE FACTS WHICH FACE EVERY FREEDOM LOVING PERSON IN ENGLAND AND IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. - NOTHING WILL CHANGE UNTIL WE ALL SING FROM THE SAME HYMN-SHEET. ACKNOWLEDGE THE REAL ENEMY WITHIN AND AT LEAST YOU WILL HAVE THE SATISFACTION OF KNOWING THE TRUE FACTS EVEN IF THEY SHOW A FORMIDABLE FOE - IF THERE WAS MORE OPEN DISCUSSION IT IS POSSIBLE THAT NOT ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI AGREE WITH THE EVIL AGENDA AND MIGHT IF THE PEOPLE SHOWED MORE OF THEIR ACCUSTOMED FIERY NATURE -AND FIGHT!!! - A CHANCE TO BRING GOOD OUT OF EVIL FOR THE BETTERMENT OF ALL MANKIND!- BUT IT IS UP TO EACH OF YOU TO BRAVELY MAKE A PLEDGE AND JOIN THE FIGHT! - NOTHING ELSE WILL SAVE YOUR FREEDOM - YOUR IDENTITY - YOUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE. -AND INDEED EVEN YOUR OWN LIFE!- AS UNLESS YOU ARE PART OF THE ELITE OR SMALL NUMBER OF SLAVES PERMITTED TO SERVE THE ILLUMINATI - YOUR CHANCES OF LIFE ARE NIL. - THIS IS AN OPEN SECRET BUT AS THE EFFECTS OF A BIG LIE - A BIG TRUTH IS ALSO HARD TO CONTEMPLATE - THE CHOICE IS YOURS!- MAKE IT SOON OR IT WILL BE AS OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL STATED TO A PACKED AND HUSHED HOUSE OF COMMONS SHORTLY BEFORE THE SECOND WORLD WAR WHEN FACTS WERE DESPERATELY NEEDED OF GERMANY'S GROWING STRENGTH FOR WAR AND THE NEED TO REARM BEFORE IT WAS - TOO!!! LATE!!! - THE SAME SITUATION APPLIES TODAY IN AUGUST, 2010 - WE ARE AT WAR! AGAINST A FORMIDABLE ENEMY - [THE BILDERBERGERS-ILLUMINATI] - THEIR INTEBNTIONS HIDDEN FROM SIGHT BUT ,NEVERTHELESS , IS A GREATER THREAT THAN THAT WHICH FACED THE COUNTRY THEN - BECAUSE THIS ENEMY HAS PLANS TO DESTROY THE GREATER PART OF THE POPULATION OF OUR PLANET EARTH - WE ASK WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? - + WE HAVE REMINDED YOU ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS OF THE BILDERBERGER/ILLUMINATI TACTIC OF THE BAD-GUY AND GOOD-GUY SCENARIO WHICH IS TO UNDERMINE SOCIETY AND THE MEANS TO JUSTIFY THEIR TOTALITARIAN MEASURES - WE KNOW HOW SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR DID SUCH A WONDERFUL JOB IN THIS DIRECTION AND WE NOW HERE THAT THE SO-CALLED GOOD GUY DAVID CAMERON IS DOING HIS BEST TO FOLLOW THEIR EXAMPLE! - + A TRULY NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF DISSINTERESTED PATRIOTS - NOT BILDERBERGERS WHO OWE ALLEGIANCE TO A FOREIGN MASONIC BODY - WOULD HAVE MORE SUPPORT FROM THE POPULACE - A ONE - TERM SERVICE IN PARLIAMENT TO AVOID PRESSURE ON AN MP TO GO AGAINST HIS CONSCIENCE. - POSSIBLY A RETURN MIGHT BE PERMITTED AFTER EACH TERM OF ABSENCE BUT THE IMPORTANTANCE OF THE MEASURE IS TO PERMIT MORE CITIZENS FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE WHO WISH TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY - IT SHOULD NOT BE A JOB FOR LIFE - THE EARLY GREEKS HAVE MANY LESSONS WHICH WE COULD UTILISE FOR BETTER GOVERNANCE! - BUT THE BILDERBERGERS ARE ENJOYING THEIR SPOILS WHETHER IN GOVERNMENT OR SO-CALLED OPPOSITION. - THEY HAVE MADE FOOLS OF US FOR TOO! LONG! -AS WE STATED BEFORE THE MAY6 GENERAL ELECTION THEY SHOULD BE OUTLAWED FROM SERVICE IN OUR ONCE SACRED AND HALLOWED CHAMBER OF WESTMINSTER WHICH THROUGHOUT ITS LONG DISTINGUISHED HISTORY HAS HAD MANY HONORABLE MEMBERS -WE URGENTLY NEED OTHERS OF A TRULY DISINTERESTED NATURE OF WHICH THE HOUSE HAS FEW AND REPLACE THE GREATER MAJORITY WITHOUT DELAY.- IT IS IN YOUR HANDS -WILL YOU DO IT? + - ON THE EU CON! - DO YOU REMEMBER!! - WE TOLD YOU SO BEFORE THE GENERAL ELECTION ON MAY 6-2010 THAT DAVID CAMERON'S PROMISES ARE WORTHLESS!!!-THIS IS NOW CONFIRMED IN THE EXCELLENT ARTICLE IN THE DAILY MAIL IN THE MELONIE PHILLIPS COLUMN ON AUGUST 2010  -  " EURO POLICE KNOCKING ON YOUR DOOR. - SURGERY HALTED BY 48 HOUR WEEK - SO MUCH FOR TORY PROMISES ON THE EU. - AN EXTRACT OF THE ARTICLE FOLLOWS: " When the Tories fought the [MAY 6-2010] general election they promised they would yield NO MORE POWER to the EUROPEAN UNION, and that they will seek to regain from the EU some of the powers that Britain has already lost.  -These pledges were designed to take the sting out of the fact that they were not, after all, going to offer A REFERENDUM on the EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION. - Three month's on , it looks increasingly as if NONE of THEIR PROMISES to SAFEGUARD BRITISH POWER is going to BE KEPT.   Indeed the COALITION GOVERNMENT seems to be going in precisely THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.- Last week, Home Secretary Theresa May told the COMMONS that BRITAIN had decided to OPT INTO the controversal EUROPEAN INVESTIGATIVE ORDER [ IT SOUNDS EXACTLY WHAT IT MEANS -A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE UNDER THE NEW WORLD ORDER-DONT YOU THINK?] - According to critics, this will mean that PROSECUTORS from ANY EU COUNTRY will be granted unprecedented and intrusive powers over the people of Britain. - They would be able to BUG the PHONE CALLS of BRITISH CITIZENS, monitor THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS and gain access to THEIR DNA if they suspected them of committing a CRIME in THOSE COUNTRIES - however trivial the offence, and EVEN IF IT WERE NOT A CRIME IN THE UK. + [Caps and Comments in square brackets are OURS!-For our BULLETIN FILE click under previous work for complete article from the Daily Mail click the following:   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1299512/Euro-police-knocking-door-Surgery-halted-48-hour-week-So-Tory-promises-EU.html - + WE NOW HEAR ON WEDNESDAY THE 4TH AUGUST THAT THE IRISH GOVERNMENT HAS AGREED WITH BRUSSELS TO ALLOW HER TROOPS TO SERVE IN OTHER COUTRIES IN THE EU AS A POLICE FORCE AND ALLOW FOREIGN TROOPS TO BE ON THEIR STREETS TO KEEP ORDER -+ WHEN YOU TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE LONG FIGHT OF THE IRISH PEOPLE FOR THEIR RIGHT TO GOVERN THEMSELVES WITH MUCH BLOODSHED GOING BACK HUNDREDS OF YEARS IT MAKES ONE WONDER WHY THEY BOTHERED AT ALL TO DO SO WHEN THEY HAVE MADE THEMSELVES SLAVES TO EVERY COUNTRY IN THE EU? - WE OURSELVES HAVE CONSTANTLY WARNED AGAINST THIS VERY MEASURE BUT IT SEEMS IN THE CASE OF IRELAND WHERE WE EXPECTED MORE OPPOSITION WE HAVE HAD A MOUSE-LIKE SURRENDER!!!! -AS INSTEAD OF AN EXPECTED STOICAL FIGHT FOR THEIR LIBERTY THEY HAD TAKEN THE BAIT AND THE TRAP HAD BEEN SPRUNG.- AS WE HAVE ALSO STATED FOR SOME TIME THE ONCE ALLIES OF IRISH INDEPENDENCE AMERICA HAS 350,000 FOREIGN TROOPS AND A LARGE NUMBER OF FORIEGN POLICE ON ITS SACRED SOIL TO BE USED BY AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT WHEN A FALSE FLAG ATTACK ENABLES MARTIAL LAW TO BE IMPLEMENTED AND THEN THE LARGE NUMBER OF CONCENTRATION CAMPS BUILT BECAUSE THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE AND EVIDENCE OF MEANS OF EXTERMINATION HAVE BEEN REVEALED - THEY HAVE MILLIONS OF PLASTIC COFFINS READY TO BE FILLED - AND IT ALL COMES UNDER FEMA - THESE CONCENTRATION CAMPS UNDER FEMA -WHICH CAME INTO BEING AFTER THE FALSE FLAG ATTACK ON 9/11 - WILL BE FILLED BY MILLIONS OF PATRIOTIC AMERICAN CITIZENS WHO CAN SEE THAT THEIR GOVERNMENT IS A SATANIC ENTITY RUN BY THE BANKSTERS AND TRAITORS AT THE HEAD OF THE MEXICAN - USA - CANADIAN GOVERNMENTS WHO ARE DESPERATE TO CONCLUDE THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION TO MATCH THE EUROPEAN UNION WHICH CHANNEL 4 IN IT'S DOCUMENTARY FAILED TO BRING MORE FACTS TO LIGHT? - FROM WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OF DAVID CAMERON'S PROMISE OF NO MORE POWERS TO THE EU HE WILL NO DOUBT FOLLOW THE TRAITOROUS LEAD OF THE IRISH GOVERNMENT. - AS WE HAVE SAID IF THERE WAS ONE COUNTRY IN THE EU THAT WE BELIEVED WOULD PROTECT ITS COUNTRY IT WOULD BE IRELAND.
 
     
 
 

Friends, Britons, Conservatives-

Lend us your vote!

 

MICHAEL MCGOUGH argues that conservatives should vote

 UKIP

 

 in the Euro-elections.

[AFTER THE EXCELLENT RESULTS IN THE EURO ELECTION IN MAY 2014 IT IS VITAL THAT THIS LAST CHANCE TO OBTAIN OUR HISTORICAL FREEDOM MUST EXTEND TO THE GENERAL ELECTION IN MAY-2015.]

 

I AM a conservative, [-ditto-] I vote for conservative policies but I have for so long been let down by the Conservative Party which has been compliant as we have been drawn into ever closer union with our fellow European Union member states, treaty by treaty.  we have only once been given our say on EU membership and that was by a Labour Government in 1975. is it right that the generations unable to vote then are constrained by that ancient vote, which only referred to an economic arrangement?

For some time now, in anticipation of the next General Election delivering change to a Conservative administration, the media ( Financial Times, Spectator and Andrew Marr for example)   have been sponsoring the idea that David Cameron is a hardened Eurosceptic

[REMEMBER! this article was written in the  Winter of 2008/9]

BUT IS HE?

Past evidence would indicate a short period of tenure if that were so. 

WE MUST NOT FORGET

how Lady Thatcher was removed subsequent to her Bruges Speech, nor Iain Duncan Smith after his in Prague.  Discarding the previous robust party policy of repatriation of fishing rights, appointing a Europhile head of candidate selection and remaining in the federalist European People's party despite promising

NOT TO DO SO

does little to confirm him as

"one of us"

for I am certain that TFA Members of all parties are confirmed Eurosceptics.  Cameron says that he will definitely leave the EPP after the 2009 European Elections, finally delivering on his leadership election promise  However Miro Topolanek, the Czech prime Minister, Cameron's partner in forming his proposed post-EEP grouping in the European Parliament is "committed" to ratifying the

LISBON TREATY

hardly an ideal partner to roll back the EU. As soon as the Conservative MEPs had elected a new leader, the Europhile Timothy Kirkhope, Charles Tannock suggested on Conservative Home , that they should stay in the EPP, for reasons of status.

WHAT OF SHADOW FOREIGN SECRETARY WILLIAM HAGUE?

I recall his commitment to opposition to the Euro was limited to the life of one parliament.  With the Pound collapsing towards parity with the Euro and the current "beneficial" economic and financial crisis, demands for us to adopt the currency of the

EUROPEAN SUPERSTATE

will come again harder to oppose post ratification of the LISBON -Treaty which requires it.  We have an OPT-OUT, but nothing is forever.

Speaking at the Freedom in the City talk Professor Haseler of the Federal trust confirmed that the EUROPHILES would push for THIS and Roland Rudd , Chairman of Britain for a New Europe had an article calling for this on the Evening Standard website (15.11.08) followed by Will Hutton in the Observer (16.11.08)

A major plank of the Conservative's European manifesto will be apparent strident opposition to the LISBON TREATY and  a commitment to hold a further referendum , post a GENERAL ELECTION.

This played well until David Cameron made his "Harrow Declaration" diluting his initial commitment. Policy is now:

We will be sold the familiar, but sad old tale of unceasing efforts to renegotiate our position in the EU, so much easier from within.

[Balderdash!-Fiddle-Faddle!]

" So if the Lisbon Treaty is not yet in force at the time of the next General Election

 [No fear of that as the supposed reluctant Scot Gordon Brown signed the

TREATY OF TREASON

 and in the words of our greatest English poet

 

'The man was noble; but with his last attempt he wiped it out; betrayed his country; and his name remains to the ensuing age abhorred.' 

  William Shakespeare

 

and a Conservative Government is elected we would put the Treaty to a referendum of the British people, recommending a "no" vote

 [Well! in 2013 we are told by David Cameron that he would fight to remain in a reformed EU so there was never any truth in the above statement.  The man has been proved a serial liar and traitor to his country and not to be trusted under any circumstances.]

If the British people rejected the Treaty, we would withdraw Britain's ratification of it. But if the treaty is in force we will be in a different situation. In our view, then, political integration would have gone too far and the Treaty would lack democratic legitimacy in this country and we would not let matters rest  there."

What does " we would not let matter rest there " mean?  We will be sold the familiar, but sad old tale of unceasing efforts to negotiate our position in the EU, so mush easier from within.  Nigel Farage, at the Bruges Group meeting in Birmingham, recalled a cartoon of a fish within a fishing net telling another outside

" it is much easier to negotiate from within"

If Cameron was really opposed to LISBON he would kill it dead

NOW!

by offering a referendum, come what may, without qualification.

[A reminder this article was written in the Winter of 2008/9

If LISBON is no good before ratification it cannot be good after.  If, because of treaty law, a NO vote in such a referendum meant we would have to leave the EU then so be it.  We woul;d, as the Freedom Association's own campaign states, be

"BETTER OFF OUT OF THE EU"

anyway.

Where are the Conservatives crying out about yet another year of unsatisfactory

EU ACCOUNTS

[Not been passed for over 18 years]

With losses of 2p in the £1 being seemed  acceptable by the auditors with actual losses being greater such as 11p in the £1 for structural funds (6 billion Euros) one would expect a Shadow chancellor to be outraged, not pussyfooting around the margins of employment taxes.

There will be no referendum, but there will be an early opportunity for all those opposed to LISBON and everything else that is wrong with our membership of the EU clearly to highlighting this. Voting for the

UKIP

on 4 June -2009

[Certainly in May 2014]

and securing yet more UKIP MEPS will send a message to the EU, the Government, and most importantly, David Cameron, that we seek change.

LEND US YOUR VOTE AND CHANGE YOUR COUNTRY-PUT COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY.  

 am certain that David Cameron would then be forced to CHANGE and PROMISE us the POLICIES the MAJORITY DEMAND.

[HE DIDN'T IN 2009]

If he does that , I envisage that all conservatives shall once again be able to vote together at a general election.

Michael Mc Gough.

michael.mcgough@lineone.net

[An excellent article which we decided to give much prominence because of the importance of the subject particularly as it is a LAST WARNING to those who LOVE THEIR FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY to understand that this is not about PARTY but about COUNTRY and by now you must surely realise that the GANG OF THREE in WESTMINSTER are FELLOW TRAVELLERS of the COLLECTIVIST SOVIETISED GODLESS UNDEMOCRATIC EUROPEAN UNION.

 

VOTE!

 

UKIP

 

FOR THE RETURN OF YOUR ONCE
FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

TO

CONTROL IMMIGRATION

AND

HAVE THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD OUR TRADING PARTNERS

AND

SECURITY AND SPACE IN OUR ISLAND HOME

 

DECEMBER   -2013

H.F.112

 
 
     
     IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!  -LATEST! - NOVEMBER 11 IS A DAY TO REMEMBER OF THE SACRIFICE OF OVER 2,000,000 servicemen and women who gave their lives in DEFENCE OF THEIR COUNTRY in TWO WORLD WARS and the countless INJURED many bearing the SCARS and TRAUMA for the REST OF THEIR LIVES - IT HAS BEEN CONSTANTLY STATED that the EU would PREVENT WAR in EUROPE but the REALITY is DIFFERENT as it was NATO which kept THE PEACE until GERMANY went to aid her SECOND WORLD WAR ALLY CROATIA and the BULKANS exploded with ALBANIA and SERBIA at each others throats as old scores were being settled.  + OVER THE PAST CENTURY  OVER 150,000,000 PEOPLE HAVE DIED THE GREATER MAJORITY IN RUSSIA IN THE GULAGS It is stated that whereas the FASCISTS MURDERED at least 50,000,000 the COMMUNISTS MURDERED at least 100,000,000.  +In the DAILY MAIL on this UNFORGETTABLE DAY  we see an article 'THE END OF BRITAIN AS A NATION STATE?  NOT ON YOUR LIFE - MR RUMPY PUMPY. and we show the the following extract :- 'History teaches us that nation states  have always been the best guarantors of LIBERTTY-DEMOCRACY-PROSPERITY and THE RULE OF LAW.    ONLY STRONG NATION STATES HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DEFEND THEIR LIBERTIES AGAINST SUCH AS NAPOLEON - HITLER OR STALIN - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328568/Nation-states-dead-EU-chief-says-belief-countries-stand-lie.html

+[PREVIOUS STATEMENT]
   -WE NOW HAVE TO ALERT YOU! TO WATCH ALEX JONES OF PRISON PLANET.COM - -THE FREEDOM LOBBY IN THE USA. - WE HAVE ONLY IN THE PAST WEEK IN JULY 2010 COME ACROSS ANOTHER FEARLESS FREEDOM FIGHTER IN THE USA AN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN BORN A JEW BROTHER NATHANAEL KAPNER WHO MORE THAN MOST IS WELL AWARE OF THE THREAT FROM THE WORLD ZIONIST CONSPIRACY AS HIS MANY ARTICLES ON HIS WEBSITEa href="http://www.realzionist">http://www.realzionistnews.com

"REAL ZIONIST NEWS" CAN TESTIFY.- IT COULD SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -YOUR LIVELIHOOD AND EVEN YOUR LIFE! - JUST FOR ONCE MAKE TIME TO SEE POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO THAT YOU WILL EVER WATCH IN YOUR LIFE! - THE ISSUES ARE MOMENTOUS AND AFFECT EVERY ONE ON OUR PLANET. - MUCH YOU WILL LEARN WILL ASTOUND YOU AND SURPRISE YOU WHEN YOU HEAR HOW THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WHO HAVE BEEN PLANNING THEIR FINANCIAL COUP FOR OVER TWO CENTURIES AND A HALF TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH AN ELITE! OLIGARTHY IN A WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE WORLD'S WEALTHIEST ABD MOST POWERFUL AND LATER TO DISPOSE OF AT LEAST 85% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION. - THESE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ARE PRAYING TO SATAN TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM YOU! - TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - IN FACT YOU HAVE JUST TWO YEARS TO RALLY YOUR NEIGHBOURS TO THE TRUTH AS AN INSIDER HAS STATED THAT THE ELITE HAVE THEIR OWN ETHICS WHICH IS TO USE THEIR HOLLYWOOD EMPIRE TO PUT OUT WAR FILMS OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS SHOWING HOW THEY INTEND THEIR PURPOSE -  SO YOU HAVE THAT LONG! TO SAVE YOURSELF! - YOUR FAMILY! -YOUR FRIENDS! AND ALL FELLOW BEINGS ON OUR PLANET FROM THE SATANIC OLIGARTHY WHO WISH TO RULE THE WORLD THEIR WAY!- THE VIDEO WILL DETAIL IN ITS 2 HOUR VIDEO PRESENTATION 'THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC'. - IF YOU TURN YOUR FACE AWAY NOW!.-.YOU WILL SUFFER FOR IT!.- WE ARE CONVINCED THAT MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY ARE UNAWARE OF WHAT IS HAPPENNING TO THEIR COUNTRY - NATURALLY THEY ARE LOOKING TO SURVIVE IN ONE OF THE WORST RECESSIONS IN LIVING MEMORY OR HISTORY WNICH HAS BEEN ENGINEERED BY THE ILLUMINATI WHICH INCLUDES THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE - THE MAIN MONEY LENDERS IN THE WORLD SINCE THEIR 18TH CENTURY AND LATER INTRIGUES IN BAVARIA IN THE 19TH CENTURY AND HAVE SUPPORTED BOTH SIDES OF MAJOR WARS AND NO DOUBT SMALLER WARS IN ORDER TO INCREASE THEIR WEALTH AND POWER.- THEIR MAJOR TRIUMPH WAS TO GET THE UNITED NATIONS OFF THE GROUND AFTER WORLD WAR II BY ROCKEFELLER WHO OWNED THE LAND WHICH HE OFFERED IN ORDER THAT THE UN BUILDING COULD BE BUILT IN NEW YORK - SINCE THEN ALL UN ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN PART OF THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION WHICH ENGINNERED A PANDEMIC WHEN THE PREVIOUS CRITERA HAD NOT BEEN REACHED AND WORLD MONETARY FUND AND THE ELITE WHICH IS MADE UP OF OVER 6000 OF THE RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD WHO TO ASSIST THEM HAVE THEIR SERVANTS IN POLITICS - ACADEMICS -PRESS AND MEDIA AND FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE  - THE BILDERBERGERS IN ALL YOUR MAIN POLITIOCAL PARTIES TO DO THEIR BIDDING - SUCH AS GORDON BROWN - ED BALLS - PETER MANDELSON - DAVID MILIBAND AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR AND IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY -  KENNETH CLARKE - GEORGE OSBORNE - WILLIAM HAGUE -http://www.bilderberg.org/Bilderberg2009. WILLIAM HAGUE - DOUGLAS HURD - AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND NOT FORGETTING THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WITH PADDY ASHDOWN AND OTHERS WHO BY THEIR COMPLICITY INTEND BY VARIOUS MEANS - WAR - TOXIC VACCINES [MERCURY}- POVERTY (DESTRUCTION OF INDUSTRY -CAP AND TRADE) - POLLUTED WATER SUPPLIES- {FLUORIDE A POISON AND OTHER POLLUTANTS - TOXIC AIR SPRAYING AND DETENTION AS IN AMERICA WHERE THERE ARE NOW DETENTION CENTRES OR TO BE MORE PRECISE CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN MANY STATES ACROSS AMERICA IT IS OBVIOUS THE MAN IN THE STREET IS UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE DISASTER AWAITING THEM!  - IN OUR SMALL WAY WE AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR MANY YEARS AS ALEX JONES -PRISON PLANET.COM AND INFOWARS>COM AND MANY OTHER BRAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHEN THEY DISAPEAR FROM SIGHT - YOU WILL TRULY DOOMED TO SLAVERY OR DEATH.- IN OUR OWN ONE MAN CAMPAIGN 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' WE HAVE WITNESSED THE TOTAL IGORANCE OF THE PUBLIC TO WHAT IS IN STORE FOR THEM!  - AT LEAST WE WILL KNOW WHY! - BUT MILLIONS WILL BE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER AS SHEEPLE AND IT WILL ONLY DAWN ON SOME THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN NOTICE WHEN THEY COULD AND MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE FREE PEOPLE'S OF OUR WORLD! WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED BY OUR PARLIAMENT AND MONARCH - YOU ARE ONLY MONTH'S AWAY FROM LOSING YOUR ANCIENT FREEDOMS - YOUR UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY OF OVER 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING! - UNLESS YOU STIR YOURSELVES!          WE WARNED YOU PRIOR TO THE GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 THAT IT COULD BE THE LAST! - AS LISBON TREATY SAYS SO! - AS REGIONS/PROVINCES WILL BE THE ORDER OF THE DAY - BUT WE NOW KNOW THAT DAVID CAMERERON HAS STOOD DOWN THE REGIONAL ASSEMBLIES AT THE PRESENT TIME BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE WOULD NOT GET AWAY PROCEEDING WITH THEM AFTER HIS STANCE ABOUT NO MORE LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY TO BRUSSELS-WELL!-NOT YET! AS WE STATED WHETHER YOU VOTED NEW LABOUR - CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS YOU HAVE AGREED TO LOSE YOUR INHERITED SACRED 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN' - WHICH SHOULD BE PASSED ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS -  BECAUSE THEY WOULD RATHER 'SELLETH HIS BIRTHRIGHT FOR A MESS OF POTTAGE' WE NOW HEAR THAT THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY MACHINE IS BAFFLED AS TO WHY IT DID NOT DO BETTER AT THE POLLS.- BECAUSE THEY BETRAYED THOSE EUROSCEPTICS WHO HAD BELIEVED THEM OVER 38 YEARS THAT THEY WOULD CHANGE THE EU BUT APART FROM BRUSSELS GIVING GROUND ON CERTAIN MATTERS AND ONLY FOR AS LONG AS THEY FIND IT NECESSARY - THE CLOSER UNION WILL STILL GO AHEAD AS PLANNED.- AS WE HAVE STATED ELSEWHERE IT IS ALL ABOUT GRADUALISM . THE PEOPLE HAVE FAILED TO REALISE THAT EVERY SO-CALLED COMPROMISE WORKS TO THE BENEFIT OF BRUSSELS -THE EVIDENCE WAS CLEAR ON THE 1 JANUARY 2010 WHEN ENGLAND NO LONGER EXISTED AS A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE BUT REGIONS SHARED BY OTHER EUROPEAN REGIONS.  ONLY GERMANY HAS ESCAPED SUCH INIHILATION AND IRONICALLY IT WILL BE GERMANY WHICH MIGHT WITH THE COLLAPSE OF THE EURO AND THE IMERGENCE OF GERMAN IDENTITY AT HOME THAT MIGHT BRING BACK THE FREE INDEPENDENDEBNT NATION STATES WORKING TOGETHER FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY-  BUT BEFORE THIS CAN TAKE PLACE THERE IS A HERCULEAN TASK BEFORE US TO REGAIN FROM THE ZIONIST BANKSTERS THE CONTROL OF THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS IN THE WORLD BECAUSE WITHOUT DOING SO FREEDOM AND EVEN THE LIVES OF MOST OF MANKIND WILL DISAPEAR FOR EVER FROM OUR PLANET.ART OF                           MAIN ISSUES BULLETIN-UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                           EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                            THE LISBON TREATY HAS BEEN RATIFIED BY ALL!     YOUR PENALTY IS BE SLAVERY! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU! -  AS ON DECEMBER 1-2009 THE TREATY CAME INTO BEING AND ENGLAND DISAPPEARED FROM HISTORY AND EVEN FROM THE MAP OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE AND LOST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL IN THE BAD BARGAIN! - THANKS TO A TRAITOROUS SCOTSMAN GORDON BROWN WHO WITH HIS TARTAN CLAN HAS CERTAINLY TAKEN REVENGE FOR PAST TIMES!               Click           Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the           1999 European Elections.               Click           Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                 LINKS FROM BULLETIN FILE TO OTHER FILES!    nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ONLY MILLIONS ON THE STREETS CAN NOW SAVE US NOW! - BUT THERE IS NO LEADER OF FREEDOM TO COMPARE WITH OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL - TO RALLY THE PEOPLE! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!     OVER 1'600 BULLETIN'S! AVAILABLE HERE!
UNITY OF ENGLISH PARTIES?                MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!                Click Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the 1999 European Elections.               Click Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!
 
     
 
 
 

As Bank Deaths Continue to Shock, Documents Reveal JPMorgan Has Been Patenting Death Derivatives

By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: February 17, 2014

The probability of two vibrant young men in their 30s who are employed by the same global bank but separated by an ocean dying within six days of each other is remote. And few companies are in as good a position to understand just how remote as is JPMorgan: since 2010, it has received four patents on quantifying longevity risks and structuring wagers via death derivatives.

The two deaths at JPMorgan remain unexplained. Gabriel Magee, a 39-year old technology Vice President was found dead on the 9th level rooftop of JPMorgan’s European headquarters at 25 Bank Street in the Canary Wharf section of London on January 28 of this year. A London coroner’s inquest is scheduled for May 15 to determine the cause of death. Six days later, Ryan Crane, a 37-year old Executive Director involved in trading at JPMorgan’s New York office was found dead at his Stamford, Connecticut home. Wall Street On Parade spoke with the Chief Medical Examiner’s office in Connecticut and was told the cause of death is “pending,” with final results expected in a few weeks.

Magee’s death was originally reported by London newspapers as a jump from the 33rd level rooftop of JPMorgan’s building with the strong implication that eyewitnesses had observed the jump. The London Evening Standard tweeted: “Bankers watch JP Morgan IT exec fall to his death from roof of London HQ,” which then linked to their article which said in its opening sentence that “A man plunged to his death from a Canary Wharf tower in front of thousands of horrified commuters today.”

When Wall Street On Parade contacted the Metropolitan Police in London a few days later, there was no assurance that even one eyewitness was on record as having seen Magee jump from the building.

Crane’s death is equally problematic. The death occurred on February 3 but the first major media to report it was Bloomberg News on February 13, ten days after the fact, and making no mention of Magee’s unexplained death just six days prior.

According to information available at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, JPMorgan created the LifeMetrics Index in March 2007 as an “international index designed to benchmark and trade longevity risk.” The index was said to enable pension plans to hedge the risk of payments to retirees and incorporated “historical and current statistics on mortality rates and life expectancy, across genders, ages, and nationalities.” From 2010 through 2013, JPMorgan has received patent approval on four longevity related patents.

Reuters reported on August 26, 2013 that the long-term longevity bets taken on by the big banks have now started to cause pain as international capital rules known as Basel III require more capital to be set aside for longer-dated positions. The article noted that “JPMorgan likely has the biggest holdings of long-dated swaps because it is the biggest swaps trader on Wall Street, responsible for about 30 percent of the market by some measures, traders at rival firms said.”

One extremely long longevity bet taken on by JPMorgan was reported by Insurance Risk on October 1, 2008. According to the publication, JPMorgan entered into a 40-year £500 million notional longevity swap with Canada Life whereby Canada Life would make a fixed annual payment in return for a floating liability-matching payment that would increase if the annuitants lived longer than expected. JPMorgan was believed to have passed on some of the risk to hedge fund investors but retained the counterparty risk. Because many of these deals are private, the full extent of JPMorgan’s exposure in this area is not known.

Wall Street veterans have also commented on the fact that JPMorgan may actually stand to profit from the early deaths of the two young men in their 30s. As we reported in March of last year, when the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations released its report on JPMorgan’s high risk bets known as the London Whale debacle, its Exhibit 81 showed that JPMorgan’s Chief Investment Office was also overseeing Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) and Corporate Owned Life Insurance (COLI) plans which allow the corporation to reap huge tax benefits by taking out life insurance policies on workers – even low wage workers – and naming the corporation the beneficiary of the death benefit. Both the buildup in the policy and the benefit at death are received tax free to the corporation.

According to the exhibit, the Chief Investment Office was tasked with “Maximization of tax-advantaged investments of life insurance premiums” for the BOLI/COLI plans. According to a report in the Wall Street Journal in 2009, JPMorgan had $12 billion in BOLI, noting that a JPMorgan spokesperson had confirmed the figure. Other insurance industry experts put the total for both BOLI and COLI at JPMorgan significantly higher.

In September of last year, Risk Magazine reported that the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the International Organization of Securities Commissions and the International Association of Insurance Supervisors had published a report in August warning regulators that longevity swaps may expose banks to longevity tail risk – meaning, for example, that actual death rates in a given portfolio may vary dramatically from a large population index.

One advisor is quoted as follows in the article: “You can see from the position paper that this market has a lot of characteristics that regulators don’t like in terms of banks getting involved in it. It’s based on long-dated risks, upfront payments and a serious element of hubris in assuming that the banks can model these risks better than the people who originated them. It’s potentially a market big enough to cause serious problems if it caught on and went wrong.”

That things are starting to go seriously wrong was evident in a Bloomberg News report that emerged last Friday. AIG reported that it was taking a $971 million impairment charge before taxes for 2013 on its holdings of life settlement contracts because people were living longer than expected. AIG is the company that was bailed out by the U.S. taxpayer to the tune of $182 billion during the financial crisis because of bets gone wrong.

Related Article:

A Rash of Deaths and a Missing Reporter — With Ties to Wall Street Investigations

 
Bookmark the permalink.

 

FEBRUARY-2014

H F 114

 

The Rothschilds have contacted the White Dragon Society so the 1 ton gold offer has been suspended. Negotiations are proceeding.

The head of the Khazarian mafia is Baron Jacob Nathaniel Rothschild

The man who is blocking the new financial system and preventing the use of Asian gold for the benefit of the planet is Baron Jacob Nathaniel Rothschild, according to his close relatives as well as the CIA. Baron Rothschild is the head of the Khazarian mafia octopus that controls the issuance of US dollars, Euros, Japanese yen and many other currencies, not including the Chinese yuan or the Russian ruble. It was Rothschild who stood in the way when the Asian elders offered gold at a 13% discount in order to set up a future planning agency charged with ending poverty, stopping environmental destruction turning this planet into a paradise. The plan is supported by the BRICS nations, the Pentagon, most of the agencies and even many of Rothschild’s own relatives.

If Baron Rothschild does not contact the White Dragon Society to negotiate a compromise within 24 hours of this newsletter being published, the WDS will offer 1 ton of gold, available for pick up in Hong Kong, to anybody who can persuade him to get out of the way. By the way Rothschild, we know you are hiding out in Mark Rich’s former house in Zug, Switzerland and not at your country home in Waddeston, Buckinghamshire, England. Don’t bother trying to hide, it would be futile.

If other people also block us we will be forced to issue our own deck of playing cards such as the Bush Nazis did in Iraq. Each card will be redeemable for a certain quantity of gold depending on the nature of the crimes against humanity carried out by the person represented.

However, what the dwindling circle of Rothschild flunkies and Khazarian Nazis need to understand is that the WDS is not out to “get” bad guys. We simply want to save the planet. If somebody stands in the way of our doing this, we will be forced to move them aside.

The other thing to note is that the WDS plan will, in some ways, resemble the year end parties Nomura Securities used to hold for foreign correspondents in Tokyo. Most correspondents are not allowed to accept gifts worth more than $20 or so from their sources. So, what Nomura did was have a bingo game where, it turns out, everybody won a rich prize. This correspondent was once “fooled into” accepting a $300 Noritake tea set in this manner. In other words, the WDS wants to make sure everybody gets a prize including the dinar people, the North Koreans, the various would be M1’s, the gnostic illuminati, the Zap crowd and everybody else who participated in the fight to create a more just financial system. Of course all the people and living creatures of this planet will also emerge a winner once we pull this off, and it will happen.

This is clearly the case because the situation on the ground is getting increasingly desperate for the Khazarian mafia as they are being systematically removed from power around the world.

The biggest recent developments have been in Israel where Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon resigned last week denouncing “extremism, violence and racism,” in Israeli society and in the Netanyahu regime.

http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.720653

This follows comments made by IDF Deputy Chief of Staff Yair Golan on Holocaust Remembrance Day where, among other things, he said “The rain of racist bills in the Knesset, those already adopted and those in the works, strongly resembles the laws adopted by the Reichstag in the early days of the Nazi regime.”

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/05/22/uri-avnery-traces-of-nazism-in-israel-confirmed/

These comments were supported by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak who said Israel has been “infected by the seeds of fascism.”

It seems the Jewish people are finally waking up to the fact their own leadership is actually composed of Khazarian Nazi gangsters with a genocidal agenda.

This belated awakening of the Jews to the horrors they have been subjected to over the millennia by their Satan worshipping leaders is not happening by accident. The Russians have carried out a very sophisticated campaign by forcing Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu to

 

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

 

May 25, 2016

 

H.F.796

 

 

 
     
     IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!  -LATEST! - NOVEMBER 11 IS A DAY TO REMEMBER OF THE SACRIFICE OF OVER 2,000,000 servicemen and women who gave their lives in DEFENCE OF THEIR COUNTRY in TWO WORLD WARS and the countless INJURED many bearing the SCARS and TRAUMA for the REST OF THEIR LIVES - IT HAS BEEN CONSTANTLY STATED that the EU would PREVENT WAR in EUROPE but the REALITY is DIFFERENT as it was NATO which kept THE PEACE until GERMANY went to aid her SECOND WORLD WAR ALLY CROATIA and the BULKANS exploded with ALBANIA and SERBIA at each others throats as old scores were being settled.  + OVER THE PAST CENTURY  OVER 150,000,000 PEOPLE HAVE DIED THE GREATER MAJORITY IN RUSSIA IN THE GULAGS It is stated that whereas the FASCISTS MURDERED at least 50,000,000 the COMMUNISTS MURDERED at least 100,000,000.  +In the DAILY MAIL on this UNFORGETTABLE DAY  we see an article 'THE END OF BRITAIN AS A NATION STATE?  NOT ON YOUR LIFE - MR RUMPY PUMPY. and we show the the following extract :- 'History teaches us that nation states  have always been the best guarantors of LIBERTTY-DEMOCRACY-PROSPERITY and THE RULE OF LAW.    ONLY STRONG NATION STATES HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DEFEND THEIR LIBERTIES AGAINST SUCH AS NAPOLEON - HITLER OR STALIN - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328568/Nation-states-dead-EU-chief-says-belief-countries-stand-lie.html

+[PREVIOUS STATEMENT]
   -WE NOW HAVE TO ALERT YOU! TO WATCH ALEX JONES OF PRISON PLANET.COM - -THE FREEDOM LOBBY IN THE USA. - WE HAVE ONLY IN THE PAST WEEK IN JULY 2010 COME ACROSS ANOTHER FEARLESS FREEDOM FIGHTER IN THE USA AN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN BORN A JEW BROTHER NATHANAEL KAPNER WHO MORE THAN MOST IS WELL AWARE OF THE THREAT FROM THE WORLD ZIONIST CONSPIRACY AS HIS MANY ARTICLES ON HIS WEBSITEa href="http://www.realzionist">http://www.realzionistnews.com

"REAL ZIONIST NEWS" CAN TESTIFY.- IT COULD SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -YOUR LIVELIHOOD AND EVEN YOUR LIFE! - JUST FOR ONCE MAKE TIME TO SEE POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO THAT YOU WILL EVER WATCH IN YOUR LIFE! - THE ISSUES ARE MOMENTOUS AND AFFECT EVERY ONE ON OUR PLANET. - MUCH YOU WILL LEARN WILL ASTOUND YOU AND SURPRISE YOU WHEN YOU HEAR HOW THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WHO HAVE BEEN PLANNING THEIR FINANCIAL COUP FOR OVER TWO CENTURIES AND A HALF TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH AN ELITE! OLIGARTHY IN A WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE WORLD'S WEALTHIEST ABD MOST POWERFUL AND LATER TO DISPOSE OF AT LEAST 85% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION. - THESE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ARE PRAYING TO SATAN TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM YOU! - TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - IN FACT YOU HAVE JUST TWO YEARS TO RALLY YOUR NEIGHBOURS TO THE TRUTH AS AN INSIDER HAS STATED THAT THE ELITE HAVE THEIR OWN ETHICS WHICH IS TO USE THEIR HOLLYWOOD EMPIRE TO PUT OUT WAR FILMS OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS SHOWING HOW THEY INTEND THEIR PURPOSE -  SO YOU HAVE THAT LONG! TO SAVE YOURSELF! - YOUR FAMILY! -YOUR FRIENDS! AND ALL FELLOW BEINGS ON OUR PLANET FROM THE SATANIC OLIGARTHY WHO WISH TO RULE THE WORLD THEIR WAY!- THE VIDEO WILL DETAIL IN ITS 2 HOUR VIDEO PRESENTATION 'THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC'. - IF YOU TURN YOUR FACE AWAY NOW!.-.YOU WILL SUFFER FOR IT!.- WE ARE CONVINCED THAT MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY ARE UNAWARE OF WHAT IS HAPPENNING TO THEIR COUNTRY - NATURALLY THEY ARE LOOKING TO SURVIVE IN ONE OF THE WORST RECESSIONS IN LIVING MEMORY OR HISTORY WNICH HAS BEEN ENGINEERED BY THE ILLUMINATI WHICH INCLUDES THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE - THE MAIN MONEY LENDERS IN THE WORLD SINCE THEIR 18TH CENTURY AND LATER INTRIGUES IN BAVARIA IN THE 19TH CENTURY AND HAVE SUPPORTED BOTH SIDES OF MAJOR WARS AND NO DOUBT SMALLER WARS IN ORDER TO INCREASE THEIR WEALTH AND POWER.- THEIR MAJOR TRIUMPH WAS TO GET THE UNITED NATIONS OFF THE GROUND AFTER WORLD WAR II BY ROCKEFELLER WHO OWNED THE LAND WHICH HE OFFERED IN ORDER THAT THE UN BUILDING COULD BE BUILT IN NEW YORK - SINCE THEN ALL UN ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN PART OF THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION WHICH ENGINNERED A PANDEMIC WHEN THE PREVIOUS CRITERA HAD NOT BEEN REACHED AND WORLD MONETARY FUND AND THE ELITE WHICH IS MADE UP OF OVER 6000 OF THE RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD WHO TO ASSIST THEM HAVE THEIR SERVANTS IN POLITICS - ACADEMICS -PRESS AND MEDIA AND FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE  - THE BILDERBERGERS IN ALL YOUR MAIN POLITIOCAL PARTIES TO DO THEIR BIDDING - SUCH AS GORDON BROWN - ED BALLS - PETER MANDELSON - DAVID MILIBAND AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR AND IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY -  KENNETH CLARKE - GEORGE OSBORNE - WILLIAM HAGUE -http://www.bilderberg.org/Bilderberg2009. WILLIAM HAGUE - DOUGLAS HURD - AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND NOT FORGETTING THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WITH PADDY ASHDOWN AND OTHERS WHO BY THEIR COMPLICITY INTEND BY VARIOUS MEANS - WAR - TOXIC VACCINES [MERCURY}- POVERTY (DESTRUCTION OF INDUSTRY -CAP AND TRADE) - POLLUTED WATER SUPPLIES- {FLUORIDE A POISON AND OTHER POLLUTANTS - TOXIC AIR SPRAYING AND DETENTION AS IN AMERICA WHERE THERE ARE NOW DETENTION CENTRES OR TO BE MORE PRECISE CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN MANY STATES ACROSS AMERICA IT IS OBVIOUS THE MAN IN THE STREET IS UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE DISASTER AWAITING THEM!  - IN OUR SMALL WAY WE AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR MANY YEARS AS ALEX JONES -PRISON PLANET.COM AND INFOWARS>COM AND MANY OTHER BRAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHEN THEY DISAPEAR FROM SIGHT - YOU WILL TRULY DOOMED TO SLAVERY OR DEATH.- IN OUR OWN ONE MAN CAMPAIGN 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' WE HAVE WITNESSED THE TOTAL IGORANCE OF THE PUBLIC TO WHAT IS IN STORE FOR THEM!  - AT LEAST WE WILL KNOW WHY! - BUT MILLIONS WILL BE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER AS SHEEPLE AND IT WILL ONLY DAWN ON SOME THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN NOTICE WHEN THEY COULD AND MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE FREE PEOPLE'S OF OUR WORLD! WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED BY OUR PARLIAMENT AND MONARCH - YOU ARE ONLY MONTH'S AWAY FROM LOSING YOUR ANCIENT FREEDOMS - YOUR UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY OF OVER 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING! - UNLESS YOU STIR YOURSELVES!          WE WARNED YOU PRIOR TO THE GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 THAT IT COULD BE THE LAST! - AS LISBON TREATY SAYS SO! - AS REGIONS/PROVINCES WILL BE THE ORDER OF THE DAY - BUT WE NOW KNOW THAT DAVID CAMERERON HAS STOOD DOWN THE REGIONAL ASSEMBLIES AT THE PRESENT TIME BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE WOULD NOT GET AWAY PROCEEDING WITH THEM AFTER HIS STANCE ABOUT NO MORE LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY TO BRUSSELS-WELL!-NOT YET! AS WE STATED WHETHER YOU VOTED NEW LABOUR - CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS YOU HAVE AGREED TO LOSE YOUR INHERITED SACRED 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN' - WHICH SHOULD BE PASSED ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS -  BECAUSE THEY WOULD RATHER 'SELLETH HIS BIRTHRIGHT FOR A MESS OF POTTAGE' WE NOW HEAR THAT THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY MACHINE IS BAFFLED AS TO WHY IT DID NOT DO BETTER AT THE POLLS.- BECAUSE THEY BETRAYED THOSE EUROSCEPTICS WHO HAD BELIEVED THEM OVER 38 YEARS THAT THEY WOULD CHANGE THE EU BUT APART FROM BRUSSELS GIVING GROUND ON CERTAIN MATTERS AND ONLY FOR AS LONG AS THEY FIND IT NECESSARY - THE CLOSER UNION WILL STILL GO AHEAD AS PLANNED.- AS WE HAVE STATED ELSEWHERE IT IS ALL ABOUT GRADUALISM . THE PEOPLE HAVE FAILED TO REALISE THAT EVERY SO-CALLED COMPROMISE WORKS TO THE BENEFIT OF BRUSSELS -THE EVIDENCE WAS CLEAR ON THE 1 JANUARY 2010 WHEN ENGLAND NO LONGER EXISTED AS A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE BUT REGIONS SHARED BY OTHER EUROPEAN REGIONS.  ONLY GERMANY HAS ESCAPED SUCH INIHILATION AND IRONICALLY IT WILL BE GERMANY WHICH MIGHT WITH THE COLLAPSE OF THE EURO AND THE IMERGENCE OF GERMAN IDENTITY AT HOME THAT MIGHT BRING BACK THE FREE INDEPENDENDEBNT NATION STATES WORKING TOGETHER FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY-  BUT BEFORE THIS CAN TAKE PLACE THERE IS A HERCULEAN TASK BEFORE US TO REGAIN FROM THE ZIONIST BANKSTERS THE CONTROL OF THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS IN THE WORLD BECAUSE WITHOUT DOING SO FREEDOM AND EVEN THE LIVES OF MOST OF MANKIND WILL DISAPEAR FOR EVER FROM OUR PLANET.ART OF                           MAIN ISSUES BULLETIN-UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                           EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                            THE LISBON TREATY HAS BEEN RATIFIED BY ALL!     YOUR PENALTY IS BE SLAVERY! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU! -  AS ON DECEMBER 1-2009 THE TREATY CAME INTO BEING AND ENGLAND DISAPPEARED FROM HISTORY AND EVEN FROM THE MAP OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE AND LOST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL IN THE BAD BARGAIN! - THANKS TO A TRAITOROUS SCOTSMAN GORDON BROWN WHO WITH HIS TARTAN CLAN HAS CERTAINLY TAKEN REVENGE FOR PAST TIMES!               Click           Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the           1999 European Elections.               Click           Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                 LINKS FROM BULLETIN FILE TO OTHER FILES!    nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ONLY MILLIONS ON THE STREETS CAN NOW SAVE US NOW! - BUT THERE IS NO LEADER OF FREEDOM TO COMPARE WITH OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL - TO RALLY THE PEOPLE! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!     OVER 1'600 BULLETIN'S! AVAILABLE HERE!
UNITY OF ENGLISH PARTIES?                MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!                Click Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the 1999 European Elections.               Click Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!
 
     
 
 
 
 
 

LETTER from Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, to

 Edward Heath,

prior to the acceptance by Parliament of the “Treaty of Rome

 

My dear Ted,

 

You wrote to me on 30th November, [1970] - about the constitutional implications of our [The UK] becoming a party to the “Treaty of Rome”. I have now had an opportunity of considering what you say in your letter and have studied the memoranda you sent me I agree with you that there are IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES INVOLVED.

 

I have no doubt that if we do sign the TREATY, we shall suffer some LOSS of SOVEREIGNTY, but before attempting to define or evaluate the loss I wish to make one general observation.

 

 At the end of the day, the ISSUE is

Whether or NOT to join the [So-called]

 EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

 

- must be decided on broad political grounds and if it appears from what follows in

this letter that I find the constitutional objections serious that does mean that I consider them conclusive [final!]

 

I do however, think it important that we should appreciate clearly from the outset exactly WHAT, from the CONSTITUTIONAL point of view, is involved if we sign the treaty, and it is with that consideration in mind that I have addressed myself to the questions you have raised.

 

Adherence to the Treaty of Rome would in my opinion, would AFFECT our SOVEREIGNTY in three ways:-

 

PARLIAMENT would be required to surrender some of its functions to the ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

The CROWN would be called ON to TRANSFER part of its TREATY-MAKING power to those ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

OUR COURTS OF LAW would sacrifice some degree of INDEPENDENCE by becoming subordinate in certain respects to the EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.

 

The POSITION of PARLIAMENT.

 

It is clear that the memorandum prepared by your Legal advisers that the Council of Ministers could eventually (after the system of qualified majority voting had come into force) make regulations which would be binding on us even against our wishes, and would in fact become for us part of the LAW of the LAND.

 

THERE ARE TWO WAYS IN WHICH THIS REQUIREMENT OF THE TREATY COULD IN PRACTICE BE IMPLEMENTED.

 

Parliament could legislate ad hoc on each occasion that the Council make regulations requiring action by us. The difficulty would be that, since Parliament can bind neither bind itself nor its successors, we could only comply with the obligations under the TREATY if PARLIAMENT abandoned its RIGHT of passing independent judgment on the legislative proposals put before it.

 

A parallel is the CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION whereby PARLIAMENT passes the British North American Bills without question at the request of the PARLIAMENT of CANADA; in this respect PARLIAMENT here has substance if not in form, abdicated its SOVEREIGN position, and it would have pro tanto [for so much] , to do the same for the [EUROPEAN] COMMUNITY.

 

 It would in theory be possible for parliament to enact at the outset legislation which would give automatic force of law to any existing or future [EU] regulations made by the appropriate organs of the Community.  For Parliament to do this would go far beyond the most extensive delegation of -----

I do not think there is any likelihood of this being acceptable to the House of Commons. Which ever course were adopted, Parliament would retain in theory the liberty to repeal the relevant Act or Acts [Of the EU Treaty] but I would agree with you that we must act on the assumption that entry into the [EU] Community would be irrevocable; we should therefore to accept a position where Parliament had no more power to repeal its own enactments than it has in practice to abrogate the Statute of Westminster. 

 

In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the [EU] Council, or other appropriate organ of the [EU] Community, its substantive powers of legislating over a whole of a very important field.

 

Treaty –Making POWERS.

 

The proposition that every treaty entered into by the United Kingdom does to some extent fetter our freedom of action is plainly TRUE.  Some treaties such as GATT and O.E.E.C restrict severely our liberty to make agreements with third parties and I should not regard it as detrimental to our sovereign that, by signing the TREATY of ROME, we undertook not to make tariff or trade agreements without the Council’s approval.

 

BUT to transfer to the Council or the [EU] Commission the power to make such treaties on our behalf, and even against our will, is an entirely different proposition.

 

There seems to me to be a clear distinction between the exercise of sovereignty involved in the conscious acceptance by us of obligations under treaty-making powers and the total or partial surrender of sovereignty involved in our cession of these powers to some other body.

 

To confer a sovereign state’s treaty-making powers on an international organisation is the first step on the road which leads by way of confederation to the fully FEDERAL STATE.

 

I do not suggest that what is involved would necessarily carry us very far in this direction, but it would be a most significant step and one for which there is no precedent in our case.  Moreover, a further surrender of sovereignty of parliamentary supremacy would necessarily be involved as you know, although the treaty-making power is vested in the CROWN.

 

 

Parliamentary sanction is required for any treaty which involves a change in the law or the imposition of taxation (to take two examples), and we cannot ratify such a treaty unless Parliament consents. But if binding treaties are to be entered into on our behalf, Parliament must surrender this function and either resign itself to becoming a rubber stamp or give the Community, in effect, the power to amend our domestic laws.

 

Independence of the Courts.

 

There is no precedent for our final appellate tribunal being required to refer questions of law (even in a limited field) to another Court and as I assume to be the implication of “refer” to accept that Court’s decision.

 

You will remember that when a similar proposal was considered in connection with the Council of Europe we felt strong objection to it. I have no doubt that the whole of the legal profession in this country would share my dislike for such a proposal which must inevitably detract from the INDEPENDENCE and AUTHORITY of OUR COURTS.

 

 

Of these three objections, the first two are by far the more important.  I must emphasise that in my view the SURRENDERS of SOVEREIGNTY involved are SERIOUS ONES, and I think that as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade PARLIAMENT or the PUBLIC to accept them.

 [Details at foot of page of information released from the Public Record Office at Kew under the 30 year rule revealing the LIES and DECEIT used by the Foreign Office to trick the people in 1972 and yet again in 1975. ]

I am sure that it would be a great mistake to under-estimate the force of objections to them.  But these objections ought to be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this stage, those who are opposed to the whole idea of our joining the [EU] Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging effect later on.  Having said this, I would emphasis once again that, although these CONSTITUTIONAL considerations must be given their full weight when we come to balance the arguments on either side, I do not for one moment wish to convey the impression that they must necessarily tip the scale.  In the long run we shall have to decide whether economic factors require us to make

SACRIFICES of SOVEREIGNTY:

My concern is to ensure that we should see exactly what it is that we are called on to sacrifice, and how serious our loss would be.

 

Yours ever,      David.

 

*          *

 

[There are many hundreds of essays on the subject of constitutional  matters on our bulletin board which give the background to the CONSPIRACY of the pro-European lobby at the time and since who felt no compunction in telling LIES-LIES and more LIES.  Some of those politicians who concealed and the TRUTH and fostered the DECEIT are still with us today in 2006. –Though some have now realised how wrong they were to turn a blind eye to the blatant half-truths and downright lies in order to get the Bill through Parliament by only 8 votes. – to remind you again that many more details by INDEPENDENT sources on our bulletin board].

 

*          *          *

 

 [Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets.]

SEPTEMBER/06

*

H.F.766
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
 
By
 
NORRIS McWHIRTER

A patriot and truth seeker.

 

HE ARGUED THAT:
 
By its nature, the duty of allegiance is in law "unalienable and perpetual". This language, from Foster`s Crown Cases (1743-1761), was quoted with approval at the trial of Sir Roger Casement in 1917. Casement had been arrested near Tralee, County Kerry, in1916, having been landed from a German U-boat to foment Irish defection. Allegiance was similarly defined at the capital trial of the supercilious Nazi wartime broadcaster, William ' Lord Haw-Haw' Joyce (1906-1946)
 
For the purposes of allegiance, foreign states are deemed either to be "in actual hostility", as in the case of Argentina in 1982,or "in amity", as in the case at present of the other European Union states. However, the condition of hostility or amity in no way disposes of the essential exclusiveness of perpetual and unalienable allegiance. No man can serve two sovereigns. When, therefore the late Sir John Fiennes (1911-1996) cunningly drafted the European Communities Bill, in 1972, and when on 17 October 1972, his unamended Bill became an Act subordinating British law to European law, there was wrought nothing less than the greatest constitutional revolution in Parliament's seven and a half centuries of existence. It was furthermore done without even a schedule of consequential repeals.
 
The politicians of the day, many of them unwittingly, voted to launch the nation on a path of "ever closer[ European] union" which could only lead to the United Kingdom becoming a subordinate offshore province of the United States of Europe. Those who engineered Britain's adherence to the
 
Treaties of Rome and of Maastricht, probably never even had Section 3 of thee Treason Felony Act 1848 drawn to their attention. In it , condemnation is incurred:
"If any person whatsoever shall, within the United Kingdom or without, compass, imagine, invent, devise or intend to deprive or dispose our most gracious Lady the Queen. . . from the style, honour, or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom. . ."
 
Indicted and convicted offenders against this unrepealed law are subject to imprisonment "for the term of his or her natural life". Yet not a finger was lifted even when, on 7 February 1992, two Privy Counsellors, Douglas Hurd and Francis Maude, signed the Maastricht Treaty which , at a stroke, brought our Monarch under suzerainty of the European Union.
 
The Queen was thereby rendered subject to past and future judgments of the Court of the European Communities in Luxembourg, from which there is no appeal and which was thereby confirmed in authority over her Courts in which she was previously arraignable.
 
Article 8 of the Treaty of Maastricht which imposed all-embracing compulsory European citizenship on the Queen and all her United Kingdom subjects, without their express consent, did so " subject to the duties imposed thereby". These duties are undefined and are thus both unknown and unknowable. One of them is however perhaps discernable since the Maastricht Treaty left unamended Article 192 of the Treaty of Rome. This reads:
 
"Decisions of the Council or of the Commission which impose a pecuniary obligation on persons other than states shall be enforceable."
 
Since "pecuniary obligations" clearly includes taxation, and "perhaps other than states" must include the new recipients of compulsory European citizenship, we have here the legal authorization of a reserve power to levy new taxation from Brussels on each and every citizen of the 15 EU countries.
 
Of al the magical and mysterious processes involved in Britain's political integration with Europe, initiated by Macmillan and engineered by Heath from 31 July 1961 to17 October 1972, none is more remarkable than the absence of a single measure repealing any part of any of the four great Constitutional Statutes - Magna Carta of Edward 1, the Petition of Right(1627), the Bill of Rights (1688 ) and the Act of Settlement (1700). Perhaps Sir John Fiennes relied upon the doctrine of implied repeal, but certainly the electorate would have regarded express repeal as offending against the principle that nothing but their own demerit can deprive natural born subjects of their peculiar privileges, called their birthright, as enshrined in these hitherto durable constitutional bulwarks.
 
In Vauxhall Estates v. Liverpool Corporation 1932, it was established in law that "no Parliament may bind its successors" However, Article Q of the timeless Maastricht Treaty said that the Treaty "is concluded for an unlimited period" and it conveyed no right or mechanism for secession. It is nonetheless arguable that what one Parliament has done , that same or some succeeding Parliament can undo. In Blackburn v.Attorney General 1983, Lord Justice Megarry, in his judgment declared:
 
"As a matter of law, the Courts of England recognize Parliament as being omnipotent in all save the power to destroy its omnipotence."
 
From the European Court of Luxembourg in 1972, the very year in which Parliament, at least temporarily, voted away its sovereignty in such large measure, came an unappealable judgment on the Treaty of Rome:
 
"The treaty entails a definitive limitation of the sovereign rights of member states against which no provisions of municipal law whatever their nature can be involved."
 
It was in reference to this Court that Sir Patrick Neill QC, former Warden of All Soul`s College, Oxford, coined the maxim; " A court with a mission is a menace; a supreme Court with a mission is a tyranny." The phrase was incorporated into the recent Euro-sceptic speech by the Home Secretary. (1996)
 
Those who see the erosion of British self -government (in defence of the 1,250,000 Britons died in the first half of this century) as emanating from the single Oxford college of Balliol, will be dubbed ' conspiracy theorists'. But the precise legal definition of a conspiracy is that it is an agreement between two or more people, unrelated in marriage, to behave in a manner that will automatically constitute an offence by at least one of them, though mens rea (guilty mind) is required by at least two co-conspirators. There is nothing theoretical about the way in which the Privy Counsellor's oath, which enjoined two Balliol educated Prime Ministers, Macmillan and Heath. And the first British President of the European Commission in Brussels (Lord Jenkins of Hillhead, also a Balliol man!):
 
"To bear faith bear faith and allegiance to the Crown and to defend its jurisdiction and powers against all foreign . . . persons . . . or states."
 
has been breached by these men.
 
What is further demoralizing is that no less than six subsequent Privy Counsellor's, following the precedent of Lord Jenkins in 1975, have each made a solemn declaration before the Luxembourg Court as European Commissioners:
 
"To perform my duties in complete independence in the general interest of the communities; in carrying out my duties".
 
This conflict of solemn undertaking can only mildly be described as duplicitous.
 
Unconstitutionality in the headlong dash to create the new European Super state is hardly confined to Britain. The Dutch draftsmen of the Maastricht Treaty included a stipulation in Article R that each and every country must ratify it "according to its own constitution requirements". Having got it ` wrong' the first time, Denmark's second referendum raised several studiously unanswered constitutional questions . No case was , however, more stark than the case of Germany herself. She has a unique Federal Constitutional Court, the Bundesverfassungsgericht, with nine judges sitting in Karksruhe to guard their Constitution.
The creation of the European Union and Britain's continued self-governance was dependent on the verdict of this Court for , on 11 October 1993 , Germany's instrument of ratification was still undeposited in Rome. Without this twelfth and last document (the other 11 EU countries having ratified the Maastricht Treaty) the EU could not come into being. It transpired however that the terms approved by this supreme German national Court to permit ratification, were miles wide of the terms of the Treaty already signed by the German Government and the eleven other nations.
For instance, the Court declared:
 
"Article F does not empower the (European) Union to procure the financial means or other means it deems necessary to fulfill its purposes."
 
Yet that is precisely what Article F does say in the following words:
 
" The Union shall provide itself with the resources necessary to attain its objectives and carry out its policies."

 
Following a question in the House of Lords, Baroness Chalker, Minister of State in the Foreign Office, confirmed that indeed the European Union "can obtain financial resources to attain the Union's objectives."
 
In another area the Karksruhe Court calmly took for Germany an negotiated opt-out from the European Monetary Union (EMU) - something for which both Denmark and the United Kingdom had to negotiate by special protocol prior to signing. Both the Governors of the Bank of England and the Danish Central Bank have confirmed that there was and is no opt-out provision for Germany in the Treaty. The fact that the terms and conditions of the Maastricht Treaty, as approved by their Constitutional Court, simply do not exist. Hence Germany's rapid ratification was in clear breach of Article R of the Treaty itself. Since its ratification was invalid, the Maastricht Treaty itself has no proper legal standing.
 
Though earlier this year (1996) our Foreign Office made a legal assessment of the Treaty, it has not publicly disclosed the obvious and only conclusion. Perhaps we are waiting either until the going gets rougher or some wealthily corporation litigates to prove that some swingeing Brussels penalty is in fact unenforceable.
 
No sovereign state can survive without the concepts of allegiance and of breaches of allegiance being treasonable.
 
Can a European Super state survive without such internal defences? The answer must assuredly be that where solidarity is more, rather than less, fragile and tenuous, the as yet unfamiliar concept of Euro-treason will eventually be vigorously advanced. There does not appear to be any ready instrument for enforcement at the moment (1996) it is not however hard to predict that the draconian powers of the Luxembourg Court will soon bring the concept of Euro-treason into focus. We are told that the Europol is intended for apprehending cross-border criminals within the Union. But the beef crisis, the United Kingdom was about to acquiesce in its creation. Perhaps a fortuitous blow for freedom has been struck and magazine articles such as this will be safe from a Europol for a little longer.
Bully for beef!
 

 
From The Freedom Association
www.tfa.net
 *  *  *

 

 

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

 

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.

 

H.F.730

IN OTHER WORDS THE SCIENCE OF GRADUALISATION-A STEP BY STEP TRANSFER OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER OF ENGLAND'S

 MAGNA CARTA! AND PETITION OF RIGHT!

IN ORDER TO HIDE THE HEINESS BETRAYAL

OF THE PEOPLE

BY

QUEEN

-LORDS  AND COMMONS.

 

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

 

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence.

 

The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

 

 

 

 

OLD HOME

Est. 1994-Policies-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links -

IMMIGRATION

 Archive-Top Topics and Stats

     

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

FREEDOM CORNER

WORLD AFFAIRS

     

TREASON!

Part 1-Preface

 

Part 2-The Strange Case Of Werner Report

 

Part 3-Mr Macmillan and 1961

 

Part 4-Mr Heath and 1970

 

 NEWFEBPART 1-2-3-(Previous Month)NEWFEBPART 4-5-

 NEWJANPART 1-2-3-(PREVIOUS MONTH)NEWJANPART 4-5-

VOTE LEAVE

FOR

 FREEDOM

 WITH A

FIRM FUTURE FOR

 ENGLAND

 

 THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 
 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

Monday, May 23,2016

CASE FOR BREXIT BY A MAN WHO REALLY KNOWS

Since the start of the referendum campaign, Remain supporters-led by the Prime Minister- have tried to portray those who want to leave the EU as dishonest, deluded, or downright mad.

Last week for example, Chancellor George Osborne sneeringly described Brexit supporters as a bunch of conspiracy theorists who believe he and Mr Cameron are part of a global stitch-up' aimed art terrifying British voters into sticking with Brussels.

'The next thing you know they will be accusing us of faking the moon landings, kidnapping Shergar , and covering up the existence of the Loch Ness Monster,' he said. All highly amusing of course, but will they use the same language about the latest recruit to the

 LEAVE CAMP?

Steve Hilton, Mr Cameron's closest friend in politics, godfather to one of his children, his former strategy chief and man who persuaded him to stand as party leader declares in today's Mail the the EU has been  and that Britain can 'corruptly captured' by a self-serving ELITE! and that BRITAIN can ONLY THRIVE by being OUTSIDE IT.

In a shattering blow to his former boss, Mr Hilton says the

UK is 'UNGOVERNABLE'

as a

DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY

inside the

EU'

which has become 'so complicated ,so secretive, so impenetrable that it's way beyond the ability of any  British Government to make it work to our advantage'.

Unlike some of the superannuated  former Tory advisers wheeled out by Remain, Mr Hilton was until recently at

THE VERY HEART OF GOVERNMENT.

Known as Mr Cameron's guru', he is the ultimate

DOWNING STREET INSIDER.

So he has seen with his own eyes how Brussels stifles

ENTERPRISE-

TRADE

COMPETITION

He describes how it works for big business and against

DEMOCRACY

and concludes

IT WILL NEVER REFORM.

 

Doesn't this searingly honest analysis put the scaremongering of the  Remain camp to shame? For all their apocalypic warnings of economic meltdown and mass unemployment, they have still not put forward a positive case for staying in the EU

By contrast, here is Mr Hilton's positive case for

GETTING OUT

'I believe it is [about] taking back power from

ARROGANT

UNACCOUNTABLE,

HUBRISTIC ELITES

and putting it where it belongs-

IN PEOPLES HANDS.'

Does that sound deluded, or just

DEMOCRATIC.

*

Full article.

H.F.790

 

 

 

 

 

TOP OF PAGE