VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

Est. 1994-

Policies-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-Top Topics and Stats

 

HOME

 

 PREVIOUS

DECEMBER 2011 ****/ DEC-JUNE-2011****JULY-SEPTEMBER-2011****  AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2012****

OCTOBER-PT2-2012 ****NOVEMBER-PT2-2012 ****DECEMBER-PT2-201 ****JANUARY-PT2-2013 ****FEBRUARY-PT2-2013-**** MARCH-PT2-2013****APRIL-PT2-2013-****MAY-PT 2-2013****SEPTEMBER-2013

[TO ASSIST OUR VIEWERS WE INCLUDE A SELECTION OF BULLETINS BUT THERE ARE MANY ALTERNATIVES SHOWN THROUGHOUT OUR 2000 BULLETINS BETWEEN 2003  AND 2013

 

FREEDOM CORNER

 PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

RON PAUL 9-11+(1) GLOBALWARMING SCAM USA IRAQ/AFGHAN LONDON BOMBINGS COMMON PURPOSE CONSPIRACY CENTRAL BANKS  +(1)
HOME ARCHIVE  MAIN BULLETINS E U  ENGLAND +(1) BILDERBERGERS+(1)

(+1)

ILLUMINATI +(1) NEW WORLD ORDER +(1)
1)U.S. Concentration Camps

2)DEC-2011- MADE-READY

3) PLANS

1)

FEMA

2)

1)Protocols

of

ZION

 

2) (3)

ZIONISM

4) (5)

 

CITY

OF

LONDON

 

 A STATE WITHIN ENGLAND

+(2)

 Dr.

John

Coleman

WHO OWNS

THE

 FED

 

POWER

OF 1)HAARP FOR GOOD   2)EVIL

Mind Control

INTERNET

CENSORSHI

1)Chemtrails

2)CREATED

C3)

1)

PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS

 

2)

(1)

War

is a Racket

(2)

(3)

(4)

HOW WARS ARE MADE

(5)

A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-

1967

 
DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE

THE TRUTH

BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

 

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

*

 

Sorry Tony [BLIAR],

we now trade more with the rest of the world than the EU

By Hugo Duncan-Daily Mail - Economics Correspondent-Friday, April 10,2015

Three days ago Tony Blair repeated the Left's mantra that we can't survive outside Europe. The FACTS are very DIFFERENT.

***

 

 
 

Part 2

 

Historic evolution of Government

 

To turn to the historic evolution of our system of Government it is essential to remember that, save for the one revolutionary period already referred to, [Part 1] there have never been a complete break in its continuity. It is still in a sense true, as Hearn states in his Government of England [Not so today in 2005] that ours is ‘the very constitution under which the [Edward the] Confessor ruled and which William [the Conqueror] swore to obey’.

 

It has, at any rate, through all the changes in its working, retained certain main features and been inspired by certain vital principles which have remained constant, and which have continued to assert or reassert themselves according to circumstances. It is not so much flexible as elastic, tending to revert to form as the material or ideological influences which have deflected it in one direction or another have weakened or been superseded.

 

It is to these main and vital features that I wish to draw attention, because they may not only help to explain some of the changes of recent years, [pre-1952] but also afford some guidance as to the nature of the even greater changes which may follow the political and economic development of the years immediately ahead of us. [Again to remind you that this was written in 1952]

 

There are as Dicey points out in The Law of the Constitution two main features from which all our constitutional development has proceeded. The one is

 

‘the Rule or Supremacy of Law’

 

and the other ‘the omnipotence or undisputed supremacy throughout the whole country of the central government’. The former feature was one deep-seated not only in Saxon, but in all medieval thinking, until superseded elsewhere by the influence of Roman Law.

 

The latter owes everything to the insight and masterful personality of William the Conqueror. With a clean slate to write upon he took care so as to distribute the spoils of the conquest among his followers as to prevent the building up of large territorial fiefs, which might in course of time dispute the royal supremacy. In this way he laid the foundation of a strong centralised government, which had no parallel in medieval Europe.

 

In the long run, indeed, the clear gap thus created between the King and his subjects, great and small, tended to draw the latter together in resistance to arbitrary royal power and in defence of the recognized law and custom of the land.

 

The barons and citizens who met together at Runnymede represent the obverse of William’s policy when the royal power he created fell into tyrannous but weaker hands. At the same time William utilised the existing Saxon shire as the means of by-passing feudal authority through his sheriff, who, sitting in its court of freeholders as the King’s representative and at the same time bringing the King’s government in touch with local needs, foreshadowed the centralized parley between the Crown and the Commons or ‘communities’ of later days.

 

From William’s day onwards the key to our constitutional evolution is to be found in the interaction between the Crown i.e. the central governing, directing, and initiating element in the national life, and the nation in its various ‘estates’, i.e. classes and communities, as the guardian of its written and unwritten laws and customs.

 

The ambitions or needs of the Crown continually demanded changes in the law, which the nation was only prepared to accept after discussion or parley with its representatives and on terms. Out of that parley, progressively more continuous and more intimate as needs increased, and out of those terms grew our system, as we know it, of Government in and with Parliament, subject to the ever-increasing influence of public opinion and to periodic review by the nation as a whole.

 

The story of that evolution is so familiar that I need only touch on a few of its salient features. The financial needs of the Crown long furnished the main lever by which Parliament increased its power. At the same time, the provision of actual money freed the Crown from dependence on feudal services and reinforced its effectively centralized authority.

The same process of discussion and bargaining led to other changes or reinstatements of the law - at first suggested to the Crown by the way of petitions, but from the fifteenth century onwards embodied in detailed Bills. These, whether initiated by or on behalf of the Crown or by Parliament itself, were then in their final form submitted to the King for his personal approval.

 

No less important was the development by which the occasional parliamentary disapproval of the executive action of individual servants of the Crown, expressed in impeachment or attainder, grew into that milder but constant day-by-day questioning and criticism of Ministers with which we are familiar. [Written in 1952- Today in 2005 we have a Prime Minister who has in general ignored the House by reducing his appearances in the Commons to the absolute minimum permitted by the now subordinate Representatives of the Nation. The Executive rules Supreme in a subservient Legislature - a gross insult to the People of this once Free Country.]

 

To Continue -Out of that development, helped by the doctrine that the King can do no wrong, sprang that division between the personal and the official powers of the Crown which is one of the most characteristic features of our Constitution. Of this I shall have something to say presently.

 

But to continue the main thread of my story. The Restoration of 1660 was, as I have already said, a true restoration of our national approach to the problem of government. It accepted both the Monarchy as the indispensable directing and initiating element in the national life, and Parliament as representing the no less indispensable element of national assent. It also unhesitatingly dropped into limbo, for good and all, those ideas of a formal written constitution, which had figured so prominently. And proved so ineffective, in the troubled years over which we were resolved to wipe the slate.

 

At the same time, it was much more than a mere restoration. Taken together with the Bill of Rights of 1689 and the Act of Settlement of 1700 it set the course of the development of our constitutional system for the future.

 

The theory of Divine Right and Prerogative was superseded by that of Constitutional Monarchy and the Prerogative as a defined branch of the Common law, which was now definitely accepted as governing the whole constitution and not merely the mutual rights of subjects.

 

The control of Parliament over the granting of revenue became complete. Meanwhile other elements of the future system of government began to emerge. Departmental ministers were found more useful to the Crown than a large and amorphous Privy Council, no longer itself a rival to Parliament as a partner in the sphere of government, and the happy repeal of a clause in the Act of Settlement which forbad their seating in the House of commons paved the way to the eventual interlocking of Government and Parliament.

 

For most of the eighteenth century the fluctuating balance between the Crown and parliament was maintained by personal management, first by the great Whig lords through their hold over the grossly over-represented boroughs and with non-conformist support, later by George III’s placemen. This was the system glorified by Montesquieu, followed by Blackstone:

 

“Herein consists the true excellence of the English government that all parts of it form a natural check on each other.”

 

[Unfortunately this is not the case in Blairdom in 2005 and unless the People shift themselves soon it will surely be the end of our Inherited Constitution.]

 

To Continue. - As based on the clear separation and equipoise of the different powers in the State. Contrasting the English give and take between equal political forces and the independence of our judges [Now under threat because they comply with the Human Rights Act which the Government itself foolishly introduced and now find a hindrance in stopping the flood of immigration into our already crowded Island]

 

To Continue. - The natural and logical consequences of the reign of law- with the rigid centralization of all powers in the French monarchy, Montesquieu rightly emphasized the true secret of English freedom. But in doing so he tended to ignore the extent to which the separate powers were increasingly interlocking in Parliament itself.

 

Where he went more seriously astray was in treating the division as one between the executive and legislative functions, abstractions bearing no relation to the reality of our political life. Parliament is not, and never has been, a legislature, in the sense of a body specially and primarily empowered to make laws. The factions of the legislature, while shared between’ kings, lords and Commons in Parliament assembled’, has always been predominately exercised by Government which indeed, has never allowed Parliament, as such, to take any initiative in one of its most important fields, that of finance.

 

The main task of Parliament is still what it was when first summoned, not to legislate or govern, but to secure full discussion and ventilation of all matters, legislative or administrative, as the condition of giving assent to Bills, whether introduced by the Government or by private Members, or its support in the executive action of Ministers.

 

But Montesquieu error was destined to exercise no small influence on the shaping of the American Constitution, and even to affect our own thinking about the function of Parliament, and still more that of other nations which have followed the outward forms of the British parliamentary system.

 

It was not, however, until discontent with royal corruption and resentment at the loss of the American colonies stirred men’s minds to the need for constitutional improvement, that the informal business of the individual management of members of Parliament finally gave way to the conception of a government with some basis of political principle to support it.

 

[Edmund] Burke’s definition of Party as ‘a body of men united for promoting by their joint endeavours the national interest upon some particular principle upon which they all agreed’, expressed a felt want. The existing Whig and Tory factions with their established clientele in the country furnished the natural working nucleus, and their old traditions, brought up to date by such critical issues as India and the French Revolution, provided a no less natural division of principle.

 

The younger Pitt’s ministry of 1784 is generally regarded as marking the definite inauguration of our government by a Party Ministry able to guarantee a parliamentary majority for the business of the Crown, without recourse to the old methods of personal influence or corruption.

 

The cabinet system itself had meanwhile been steadily developing. I need not go into detail into the well-known story, whether correct or apocryphal, of the origins of the Cabinet as the outcome, in part, of Harley’s informal Saturday dinners, and, in part, of George I’s reluctance to attend ministerial councils at which, as he knew no English and his Ministers no German, discussion had to be confined to such Latin as they could muster between them.

 

The essential is that the growth of the system of collective responsibility, based on previous private discussion, strengthened the hands of the Ministry, not only as against the monarch, but also as against Parliament.

 

To single an individual for dismissal or denunciation is far easier than to denounce or urge the dismissal of A TEAM, especially if the only alternative is another even less welcome team. All this naturally became more effective after 1784.

 

[We experience the same problem with Blair and his cronies and the majority of Labour members in the House in 2005].

 

What is essential to keep in mind is that the new system of Responsible Parliamentary Government, while in one sense subordinating the policy of the Crown to Party exigencies, yet is another, meant an accession of the actual power of Government, as such, in exercising control over Parliament.

 

It meant converting the majority in Parliament into placemen, within at least the penumbra of office and influence, while at the same time under constant threat of losing their places (and nowadays [1952] their member’s salaries) if their lack of support to the Government should cause the later to dissolve Parliament

 

[Has this not been so for many years now?]

 

At the same time neither Ministers nor their supporters have, in their individual capacity, ceased to remain representatives of the nation or of their individual constituencies. Nor have they entirely abandoned to the Opposition the original critical and debating function of Parliament. Subject to the varying strength of party discipline, government supporters can still criticize this or that feature of the Government’s legislation or administration in public- and even more freely behind the scenes to the Whips or at Party meetings in committee rooms.

 

So, too, Ministers feel a kinship with other members, with whom they share the responsibilities and problems with which they have to deal in their constituencies. What is more, they hope, even though they lose office, to remain in Parliament and so continue to exercise their influence over affairs pending their return to power.

 

They are parliamentarians first and for the greater part of their public life; Ministers of the Crown at intervals. It is as parliamentarians they are first tested and judged, both for ability and for character, by their seniors and their fellows; that they win and then keep or lose their right to office.

 

Above all, whether Ministers or backbenchers, in office or in opposition, they are all subject to the firm and impartial control of Mr Speaker, as the embodiment of the traditions of Parliament and the rights of its humblest Member.

All these factors have combined to keep Parliament as the centre and focus of the nation’s affairs, the conspicuous stage on which the great drama is acted, the great game of politics played.

 

[Though Today in 2005 the game is looking decidedly unpleasant and devious when we see how politicians over the last 32 years have used it in order to deceive the British people - while they destroy all ‘checks and balances ‘built up over hundreds of years - in order to have allowed Tony Blair to sign away the Inherited Constitution of our Land. And what is the Leader of Her Majesty’s Opposition doing about this -NOTHING-_NOTHING- NOTHING. Yes! Michael Howard is the man who was so grateful in being given the opportunity in our once Free Country. And what does he do he sells out his adopted Country knowing that the very Country which gave him sanctuary and opportunity has been and is still being forcible changed into a mirror image of the Continental model alien to the majority of the People of this Island. Thanks a Lot- Mr Howard -I Don’t Think So- and the People need to tell him so at the forthcoming election.]

 

To Continue. - It is this interlocking and interchangeability, which have maintained the unity and harmony of our political life, and it is in that sense that we rightly boast of our system as one of parliamentary government. (?) [Written in 1952].

 

All the same, throughout the evolution of that system, the two main elements of our political life have remained distinct, though progressively harmonised and integrated. Our constitution is still, at bottom, based on a continuous parley or Conference in Parliament between Crown, i.e. the Government, as the directing and energising element, and the representatives of the nation whose assent and acquiescence are essential, and only to be secured by full discussion.

 

[Of course there are limits to what any citizen considers open to assent -one issue certainly is not i.e.

 

Freedom to retain one’s citizenship of one’s Country and its inherited Constitution.

 

A citizen of New England-USA would have no fears on this issue-having a written Constitution and a Supreme Court to protect that Right!

 

Unfortunately with Prime Ministers with more power than a President of the USA we are not so lucky-that is why it has been so easy for so many traitorous politicians over the last 32 years to betray their Country.]

 

 

Click for Part 3

 

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

 

*

BBC NEWS

 

*

The abolition of Britain
 by The Reform Treaty
 - Second Reading-Passed by majority

 of 138

on

21st January, 2008

*

 

 

13th October,2007

 

So You Want Out Of The EU

 

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

 

WHY WE ASK YOUR SUPPORT

When we first saw the petition we reasoned that it had no chance of success from No 10 but we supported it in order to gauge the number of Britons who would publicly put their name to a list which stated that they wished to RENUNCIATE EU CITIZENSHIP and retain only BRITISH.-THAT IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT. Some might say that to hide behind a negative premise is both cowardly and playing into the hands of the EU FEDERALISTS.  DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT- Place your vote so ALL can see that YOU CARE. about YOUR COUNTRY and YOUR FREEDOM.

 

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British  (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

*

 

       
   

CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!

 

A BLUNT REPLY TO THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th DECEMBER ,2007.

*

 

 

TIME FOR DECISION

 

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!

*

The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of

THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA

*

The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS

*

MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

*

YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.

 

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS  QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.

OR

WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.

WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!

 

THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE

'Rights and Liberties'

of

Englishmen

Will keep by HER SACRED OATH

or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a  THEME PARK in the future

THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.

We are told on the BBC  (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT

'Stuck in the past'

Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of  our

FREEDOM and COUNTRY.

 

Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world.

THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!

 

Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC  as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's  INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by

PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.

 

If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION.

WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?

THEY ARE PRICELESS!

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED

*

 

The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST!

6 months to be EXACT!

*

 

THE EU

 

WE-AND THEM!

 

WE are to join THEM

THEY are not joining US

WE have more to LOSE

THEY have more to GAIN

WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY

THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!

*

Our Queen and the EU Constitution

*

The Spirit of England

by

Winston Churchill

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II

*

We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.

 

 As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER. 

The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.

There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'

Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the  Monarch talks  our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very  noses?

Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS  are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.

We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES  ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.

As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.

IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded  we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.

Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a

THEME PARK

*

Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION

and the need for a

REFERENDUM

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

*

 

Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.

*

 

[All words/word underlined  have a separate bulletin]

 

 
     

 

 

 

                                                                                                

A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

TO

ALL OUR VIEWERS.

 

WE WISH YOU ALL A

HAPPY CHRISTMAS

AND A

HAPPY NEW YEAR

IN

2008

[Since our Xmas message to you all last year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]

We Remember The Year 2006
 

The Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953

[We were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year  PROTECTOR of our inherited

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN

HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN

Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897

'We still leave it to the work of

Alfred the Great

 that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless police state to call itself a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

It is within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear for ALL TO SEE.

In the Netherlands a number of years ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

*

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS  QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

*

 

A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

by

Harry Beckhough

[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]

2004

*

'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'

-NOT any MORE

 

 

Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

 

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her 9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

 

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.

 

 

 

 

 KNOWN GOOD GUYS UNDER SUSPICION OF BEING PROVOCATEURS ON BEHALF OF THE ILLUMINATI.

As we have explained elsewhere it is this typical situation which we must fear the most and expect this insidious practice of the satanic ILLUMINATI who wish to ensure where possible that it is THEIR STOOGE in CONTROL! within their ENEMIES camp.  We suspect that there are many more within UKIP [-possibly even MEP's-one talking about a deal with the Conservative party ] and  BNP and other declared advocates across the political spectrum pursuing  FREEDOM! and NATION STATE! who will soon share the space below.

There are always great difficulty in these matters and one can only go on the actions and contacts of the individuals involved.

There can be no greater or more heinous crime imaginable than for one to betray the TRUST of a COMRADE fighting for a JUST! and GOOD CAUSE!

'It is said: 'No man can justly censure or condemn another, because indeed no man truly knows another'

But what we are considering is at a time when those who intend to destroy the majority of mankind and make serfs of the majority allowed to live and  It is a WAR we are FIGHTING for SURVIVAL! and in such circumstances a persons ACTIONS or lack of ACTION! are the ONLY basis on which one can JUDGE! another.

Finally it is up to the membership of UKIP and BNP to purge THEIR PARTY of the TRAITORS within and look for those who have the fire in their belly to carry the party forward to VICTORY!

 

MAY-2012

 

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

*

IS SENATOR RON PAUL- ILLUMINATI?

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

MAY-2012

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ &  LATEST- PAGE FOUR