VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

&

 AT THE REFERENDUM

WHICH MUST BE HELD IN THE FOUR NATION STATES

VOTE TO LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC

NAZI-PLANNED EU.

 

EST.1994

-Elections 1997 - and EU election 1999-  POLICIES -Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-

CHRISTIAN HERITAGE

Top Topics and Stats

IMMIGRATION

 

 
FREEDOM CORNER

 

 

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

 
 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.
 
 
     
 

 

The CORONATION OATH ACT of 1688 declares OATH TAKEN for the PURPOSE of MAINTAINING our SPIRITUAL and CIVIL RIGHTS.

*

 

Can the Queen veto the New EU Treaty?

 YES!

 

 

With less than six weeks to the possible ratification of the NEW EU TREATY by HER MAJESTY the QUEEN we have decided to bring to our viewers the erudite work  of  Mr J. Bingley (2003) who may be contacted through the Quarterly Periodical

"This England"

 

'Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of an EU Constitution this article contemplating our own UK Constitution, is specially topical'

 

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specially intended, indeed designed to

LIMIT

the

POWERS OF THE STATE

with respect

TO ITS PEOPLE.

The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide

REMEDY IF ABUSED.

The whole constitution originates its authority from the

COMMON LAW

SUPREMACY resides in the LAW and PEOPLE

NOT

THE CROWN or PARLIAMENT

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that

LAW IS SUPREME

The  RULE of LAW is the antithesis of ARBITRARY POWER.

Integral to it, is the system of

JURY TRIAL

It places the the POWER of LAW enforcement in the HANDS of the PEOPLE,

THIS IS THE MOST VITAL SAFEGUARD AGAINST DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the 'RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN'.

THESE ARE THE 'BIRTHRIGHT OF THE PEOPLE'.

 

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that the OATH is taken for the purpose of

"Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties."

It is a contract with the people which makes it the

PERMANENT DUTY of the CROWN and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the MONARCH to govern ONLY according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW and the CUSTOM and to 'cause law and justice with mercy to be used in all JUDGMENTS.'

All POWER of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for Royal Assent. A Bill is not enacted until it has been authorised by the

SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested in the

MONARCH

it is contracted

ONLY TO BE USED

in accordance with the

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

 

This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from

OVER MIGHTY GOVERNANCE.

 

It was used to defeat the DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS; a claim of ABSOLUTE POWER by the STUART MONARCHS.

The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, NOT the SUPREMACY of the CROWN or of PARLIAMENT. There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

 

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The People give allegiance to the Crown. here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The Magna Carta made provision for the People to use any means including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

THIS RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY.

The use of PETITION has historically become the means to seek CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDY. This RIGHT of PETITION is secured for the PEOPLE by OUR CONSTITUTION.

The CORONATION CONTRACT also PROTECTS the PEOPLE from ABUSE of POWER by formalising and causing SEPARATION of POWER.

It separates the authorisation (Royal Assent) from those who determine its content or application (in Bills); the Lords and Commons in Parliament. This separation prohibits the formation of ABSOLUTE POWER from falling into DESPOTIC or TYRANNICAL misuse and the jury inhibits draconian enforcements.  The Monarch, the Lords or Commons may NOT  arbitrarily suspend or dispense with the LAW. The LAW may be made or adjusted only by the tripartite body of Parliament.

[THE CROWN

THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

THE HOUSE OF LORDS.]

[That is why the EDP in January ,2008  has suggested that HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN not sign the NEW EU TREATY because without HER approval the TREATY cannot come into being.]

The Monarch is the People's repository of ALL the Sovereign Powers of the State.

The limited range of remaining prerogatives may not be used in repugnance of the LAW.

The MONARCH is bound by LAW. The MONARCH may only exercise powers in accordance with the CONSTITUTION and LAW in force. Thus the role of CONSTITUTIONAL LAW is a RULE and a PROCESS of GOVERNANCE for PARLIAMENT to OBSERVE.

IT IS FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE.

The maxims 'no parliament may bind its successor' and 'the sovereignty of the Crown in parliament' have been confused through partial misunderstanding to the detriment of our Constitution. No combination of these maxims can or may absolve the Crown, its MINISTERS or Parliament, from owing allegiance ,or being at all times in compliance with CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

There can be no implied repeal of Constitutional Statutes. Such anomalies as implied repeal weaken the

RULE of LAW

confusing interpretation, and may tend to BREACH the CORONATION OATH and CONSTITUTION. Constitutional repeal must be by express enactment and only where the parts of the Constitution are not protected by the entrenchment of OATH. The most fundamental and important is the entrenchment of the whole process of the

RULE of LAW

It is contracted permanently by the

CORONATION OATH

being the fundamental by which governing power is held.

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.

(the right to withhold assent)

'TO LET RIGHT BE DONE'....

*

 

January, 2008

 

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 
     
 

HOME