A new poll published by the BBC found that nearly one third of Muslims present in Britain supported the Muslims who murdered 12 people in an attack on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in France.

The poll, which surveyed 1,000 Muslims over age 18, found that 27 percent said they have some sympathy for the Muslims who carried out the murderous attack in January. When asked if attacks on those who publish cartoons of Muhammad “can never be justified,” 24 percent of respondents disagreed. In other words, nearly a quarter of Muslims residing in Britain thought such attacks could be justified. Asked directly if publishers of offensive cartoons “deserved” to be attacked,

11 percent said yes.

Another four percent refused to answer or said they didn’t know.

Twenty percent of respondents agreed that “western liberal society” is not compatible with Islam, while another seven percent said they didn’t know. Asked if they felt sympathy toward those who want to “fight against western interests,” 11 percent said yes. And asked if they knew any Muslims who were “strongly sympathetic” toward ISIS and al-Qaeda, eight percent said they did.

Some of the results seem to be at odds with other responses in the same poll. For instance, 95 percent of Muslim respondents said they felt loyal to Britain and 93 percent said Muslims should obey British law. Asked if they would call police on someone who they knew to be planning violence, 94 percent said yes.

The poll could have some resonance here in the United States where the President has repeatedly claimed ISIS has no connection to Islam. Specifically, Obama claimed last year during a scripted primetime address that the Islamic State was “un-Islamic.” More recently, at a summit on violent extremism, he refused to identify ISIS as Islamic, instead saying they are “terrorists” with no religious affiliation whatsoever. Obama also argued that the idea Islam was incompatible with western values was “a lie.”

They propagate the notion that America — and the West, generally — is at war with Islam. That’s how they recruit. That’s how they try to radicalize young people. We must never accept the premise that they put forward, because it is a lie.

The results of the BBC poll demonstrate that even murderous acts of terror carried out by ISIS’ supporters (the Charlie Hebdo attacks) are not clearly rejected by Muslims in Britain. It also suggests there is already a large pool (20 percent) of Muslims who believe Islam is incompatible with western values.

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

A WARNING!

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society. Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

ulticultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with Londonistan (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

Diversity in the UK

A ranking of social evils

Multiculturalism and truth

Nations are the unit of cultural diversity

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

The aims of Localism

Multiculturalism

IMMIGRATION FILE

H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

https://unherd.com/2023/03/the-great-food-reset-has-begun/

"They are destroying the world's food supply right under our noses. We are going to be eating bugs in the next few years if something isn't done about this asap. Just recently I found out about the farmer protests in France and this needs to happen all around the world. These organisations like WHO and WEF have close ties with the Rockefeller's and are controlling YOUR governments with their sick twisted evil agenda. We need to wake up these sleeping morons or we are going to suffer."

MARCH 15,2024

WE DON'T NEED MORE MIGRANTS - WE NEED TO GIVE BRITISH WORKERS NEW SKILLS.

COMMENTARY

DR RAKIB EHSAN: 'Plugging workforce gaps with migrants is ...

cs Expert, For The Daily Mail .

Rakib Ehsan

Dr Rakib Ehsan is an expert in social cohesion and public security and the author of the forthcoming book

'Beyond Grievance.'

November 25, 2022

DAILY MAIL

DAILY MAIL-January 5-2023

Nigel Farage unveils 635-strong army of Brexit Party MP ...

of Islamist extremists

by

AYAAA HIRSI

Daily Mail-April 27-2024

TAJ HARGEY: No wonder just a quarter of British Muslims believe the October 7 attacks took place when so many hardllners are allowed to flourish here.

DAILY MAIL-9-4-24.

Don't leave our country defenceless: Not for decades has ..Daily Mail-march 3,2024.

The charge of blasphemy - backed by

threats of violence

. by Fank Furedi.Daily Mail March 18,2024.

Search Results

class stopped

pandering

to

PEOPLE WHO DESPISE BRITAIN.

of foreign student visas still in limbo-

by David Barrett-Daily Mail - Home affaires Editor ..

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: The Muslim firebrand kicked out of France says it couldn't happen in Britain.

5 facts about the Muslim population in Europe

509 Comments

By By Tom Rawstorne For The Daily Mail - April 24th 2015, 7:49:31 pm

Poll: Nearly One Third of UK Muslims Sympathize with Charlie Hebdo Killers

Read More Stories About:

Did you know?

ANDREW NEIL: We are living in the Age of the Autocrat... and if we want to avoid WWIII we must spend far more on defence to show we�ll fight for democracy

...Daily Mail-Saturday 8,2023.

DR RAKIB EHSAN: 'Plugging workforce gaps with migrants is ...

STEPHEN GLOVER:

Allying our shrunken

forces to Japan is ...

Daily Mail-November 3,2022

Patriotic Alternative

Patriotic Alternative

Muslim population in parts of Europe could TRIPLE by 2050: New study predicts migration and birth rates will lead to dramatic rise in numbers across continent

RELATED ARTICLES

Share this article

EU pledges �39bn to limit mass migration from Africa to Europe

Share or comment on this article