Major Issues Bulletin 30 - EDP English Democratic Party.

Crimes against the Authority and Integrity of Parliament are punishable by Impeachment.

One of our greatest authorities on the Law and the Constitution on the question of the future use of refusal of supplies or Impeachment says:

The answer is, that they are disused [not obsolete] because ultimate obedience to the underlying principle of all modern constitutionalism, which is nothing else than the principle of obedience to the will of the nation as expressed through Parliament is so closely bound up with the law of the land that it can hardly be violated without a breach of the ordinary law.

Hence the extraordinary remedies which were once necessary for enforcing the deliberate will of the nation, having become unnecessary, [until another Tyrant such as Tony Blair as with Charles the First in history assumed he was above the Law of the Constitution.], have fallen into desuetude.

If they are not altogether abolished, the cause of the conservatism of the English people, and partly in the valid consideration that crimes may still be occasionally committed [as with Tony Blair] for which the ordinary law of the land hardly affords the punishment, and which therefore may well be dealt with by the High Court of Parliament.

In the words of Mr Dicey… one essential principle of the Constitution is obedience by ALL persons to the deliberately expressed will of the House of Commons in the first instance, and ultimately to the will of the nation as expressed through Parliament.

. . . The Law of the Constitution, again is all its branches the results of two guiding principles, which have been gradually worked out by the more or less conscience effects of generations of English Statesmen and Lawyers.

This curious process by which the personal authority of the King has been turned into the sovereignty of the [Queen] King in Parliament, has had two effects:

1) It has preserved the arbitrary power of the Monarch. It has preserved intact and undiminished the supreme authority of the State.

2) The second of the principles is what I have called the “Rule of Law” or the supremacy through all our Institutions of the ordinary laws of the land.

This rule of law, which means at bottom the right of the Courts to punish any illegal act by whomsoever committed, is the very essence of the English institutions.

If the sovereignty of Parliament gives the form, the supremacy of the law of the land determines the substance of our Constitution.

The English Constitution, in short, which appears when looked at from one point of view to be a mere collection of practices or customs, turns out, when examined in its legal aspect, to be more truly than any other polity in the world, except the Constitution of the United states of America, based on the Law of the land.

A few words may be in place as to the method by which the gradual transfer of power from the Crown [in 1669] to a body which has come more and more to represent the nation. [To the First minister or Prime Minister]

The leaders of the English People in their contests in their contests with Royal power never attempted, except in periods of revolutionary violence, to destroy or dissipate the authority of the Crown as Head of State.

Their policy, continued through centuries, was to leave the power of the King untouched [this is how Tony Blair has been able follow his own agenda with no concern for any one else’s views.] but to bind down the action of the Crown to recognised modes of procedure which, if observed, would secure first the supremacy of the law, and ultimately the sovereignty of the nation.

The King was recognised as the only legislator, but he could enact no valid law except as King in Parliament; the King held in his hands all the prerogatives of the executive government, but, as was after long struggles determined, he could legally exercise these prerogatives only through Ministers who were members of his Council, and incurred responsibility for his acts.

Thus the personal will of the King was gradually identified with and transformed into the lawful and legally expressed will of the Crown. This transformation was based upon the constant use of fictions. It bears on its face that it was the invention of lawyers.

When we see what are the principles, which truly underlie the English polity, we also perceive how rarely foreign statesmen who more or less intended to copy the Constitution of England have followed them.

The sovereignty of Parliament is an idea fundamentally inconsistent with the notions, which govern the inflexible or rigid constitutions existing in by far the most important of the countries, which have adopted any scheme of representative government.

The “Rule of Law” is a conception, which in the United States indeed has received a development beyond that which it has reached in England; but it an idea not so much unknown to as deliberately rejected by the constitution-makers of France. [This is an important aspect of the great differences between the systems of England and other nations in Europe particularly France. That is why Tony Blair has done everything he can to destroy our form of Constitution.] And of other continental countries which have followed the French guidance.

For [us] the supremacy of the law of the land means in the last resort the right of the judges to control the executive government, whilst the separation des pouvoirs means, as construed by Frenchmen, the right of the government to control the judges. [If we had not implemented the Human Rights Act into our law we would have had less ridiculous decisions from our Judges and if we left the EU our Judges would be again as previously over 700 years ,Guardians of our: ]

“Rights and Liberties of Englishman”

To say this is not to assert that foreign forms of government are necessarily inferior to the English Constitution, unsuited for a civilised and free people.

All that necessarily results from an analysis of our institutions, and a comparison of them with the institutions of foreign countries, is that the English Constitution is still marked, far more deeply than is generally supposed, by peculiar features, and that these peculiar characteristics may be summed up in the combination of Parliamentary Sovereignty with the ‘Rule of law.’

[The author of the above work was obviously being diplomatic in his final judgment because if his statement was so accurate why have our politicians over 40 years been gradually endeavouring to change our superior Constitution for a continental system, which is counter to the manner of our People.]

[Fonts altered-bolding used –comments in brackets]

* * *

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

13th October,2007

So You Want Out Of The EU

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

www.eutruth.org.uk

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

www.speakout.co.uk

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

VOTE -2007

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

FREE

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

MAY/07

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

ADDED NOV 1-2015

BRITISH FORCES (OVERSEAS) BULLETINS

B F 1-BLAIR'SCRAPED THE BARREL' TO JUSTIFY INVASION OF IRAQ****B F 2-The Security Services and the Safety of YOUR REALM****B F 3-It's impossible to win a conflict without enough men on the ground.****B F 4-FIVE WARS BLAIR TO REDUCE OUR ILLUSTRIOUS FIGHTING REGIMENTS****B F5-The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island's Defenders of Freedom now at further RISK!**** B F 6-IRAQ NOT WORTH THE LIFE OF ANOTHER BRITISH SOLDIER****B F 7-Former Chief of Defence Intelligence supports Whistleblowers****B F 8-TONY BLAIR-THE MAN WHO NEVER DID-YET!****B F 9- The JUSTIFICATION for WAR offered by MR BLAIR may have been the WRONG ONE, but it was a JUST WAR-says DAILY TELEGRAPH ****. B F 10-A TROOPER and a TRAVESTY of JUSTICE****B F 11-House of Commons must REGAIN its RESPONSIBILITY****B F 12-Why wont Mr Ingram realise he CANNOT compare FUNDING of ARMY RECRUITMENT TRAINING with PRIVATE CORPORATIONS****B 490-TONY BLAIR WILL NOT ADMIT INVASION OF IRAQ MADE BRITAIN VULNERABLE TO TERRORIST ATTACK-ALMOST EVERYONE KNOWS-IT DID!****B484-ABANDONED HEROES FIGHTING AND DYING ON £2 AN HOUR-IRAQ-AFGHANISTAN-AND OTHER CONFLICTS-WHY?****B492-TELL THE TRUTH!-MR BLAIR-OF HOW LONG OUR TROOPS WILL REMAIN IN AFGHANISTAN****B 499-Three more British deaths take Afghan toll to 19 in 6 days.****B 501-SADDAM HAD NO LINK TO AL QAEDA-says THE SENATE of the USA***B 504-BLAIR CONFESSES HIS FAULTS BUT STILL CONTINUES WITH HIS DISASTROUS POLICIES.****

[OVER THE PAST 12 YEARS WE HAVE SHOWN A GREAT NUMBER OF BULLETINS WITH REGARD TO OUR ARMED SERVICES WHO WERE NOT ALWAYS GIVEN THE APPROPRIATE TOOLS TO DO THE JOB- MR HOON-COMES TO MIND-SHORTAGE OF BODY ARMOUR AND SUITABLE AND SAFE TRANSPORT. THE ABOVE ARTICLES ARE BUT A FEW OF THE MANY BUT WE WILL ADD TO THE LIST OVER THE FOLLOWING WEEKS. A VISIT TO IRAQ FILE & BULLETIN FILE WILL REVEAL MUCH INFORMATION.]

FOR FURTHER INFO GO TO:

PT 2/ PT3/PT4/PT5/PT6

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.html

KNOWN GOOD GUYS UNDER SUSPICION OF BEING PROVOCATEURS ON BEHALF OF THE ILLUMINATI.

As we have explained elsewhere it is this typical situation which we must fear the most and expect this insidious practice of the satanic ILLUMINATI who wish to ensure where possible that it is THEIR STOOGE in CONTROL! within their ENEMIES camp. We suspect that there are many more within UKIP [-possibly even MEP's-one talking about a deal with the Conservative party ] and BNP and other declared advocates across the political spectrum pursuing FREEDOM! and NATION STATE! who will soon share the space below.
There are always great difficulty in these matters and one can only go on the actions and contacts of the individuals involved.
There can be no greater or more heinous crime imaginable than for one to betray the TRUST of a COMRADE fighting for a JUST! and GOOD CAUSE!
'It is said: 'No man can justly censure or condemn another, because indeed no man truly knows another'
But what we are considering is at a time when those who intend to destroy the majority of mankind and make serfs of the majority allowed to live and It is a WAR we are FIGHTING for SURVIVAL! and in such circumstances a persons ACTIONS or lack of ACTION! are the ONLY basis on which one can JUDGE! another.
Finally it is up to the membership of UKIP and BNP to purge THEIR PARTY of the TRAITORS within and look for those who have the fire in their belly to carry the party forward to VICTORY!

MAY-2012

ENGLAND

Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ **** THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ **** WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/**** DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ **** NOR SHALL MY SWORD/**** WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ **** WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/**** ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/**** ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /**** ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/**** ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./**** WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ **** KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY / **** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED**** EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.