MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
     
     
 

 

Five Wars Blair to reduce our illustrious fighting Regiments.

 

* *

Don’t ask us to keep the peace as well, Mr Blair.’

 

by

 

General Sir Michael Rose-

 

Former Commanding Officer of the SAS who led the UN Forces in Bosnia.

 

Daily Mail, Tuesday, 22nd July 2004.

 

 

Tony Blair is now engaged in his [sixth] war in ten years and is arguably the most warmongering British Prime Minister since Lord Palmerston.

 

Yet he does not seem to understand that wars not only cost lives, but they also cost a great deal of money.

 

Even in periods of prolonged peace, defence cannot be obtained on the cheap-partly because we have to keep up with new developments in military technology but also because of the considerable expense of maintaining all-volunteer forces.

 

Look at America, where President Bush has waged a war against terrorism since September 11, 2001.

 

He has increased the U.S. defence budget by 35 per cent- from $76.4 billion to $104.8billion- and has raised the strength

Of his fighting services by 30,000 servicemen and women.

 

In the same period, Mr Blair has made only marginal increases in the defence budget while the strength of our Armed Forces has been greatly reduced.

 

At the end of the Cold War, the regular component of the British Army numbered 116,000 and the reservists 69,000.

 

But following yesterday’s announcement [Mon.21st July, 2004] by Geoffrey Hoon

, The Regular Army will be cut again to 102,000 and the Territorial Army will remain under recruited at 43,000 strong.

 

The Defence Secretary says we need to take account of the changed demands of warfare.

 

He wants to invest in technological rather than manpower- what he calls a network enabled capability- in order to identify targets rapidly and destroy them with precision weaponry.

Such a capability, he rightly argues, would allow us rapidly to defeat an opponent with few British causalities.

 

He cites the overthrow of the Taliban in Afghanistan and that of Saddam Hussein in Iraq as examples.

 

The problem is that, while it is true that modern technology can rapidly prevail against such old fashioned armies, the corollary of war fighting is nation building, which is extremely manpower intensive.

 

In 1994, in Bosnia, the UN had more than 23,000 peacekeepers just to help the delivery of aid. NATO has estimated that it would take ten times that number to invade the country and enforce a peace settlement.

 

Today, we have about half that number of soldiers in Iraq and, as a result, we are failing.

 

With so few troops, we simply cannot achieve the minimum level of security necessary for nation building.

 

Each day, scores of Iraqis are killed while re-construction is virtually at a standstill.

To succeed- to bring the Iraqi the peace and freedom we promised-we need to deploy far larger numbers of troops on the ground in Iraq and they will have to remain there for prolonged periods of time.

 

Moreover, there has to be some rotation for those forces engaged in operations.

 

 

As Former Adjutant General of the British army (responsible for manpower and human resources), I well know that a balanced force structure requires having twice the number of soldiers engaged on training and administration, as there are deployed on operations.

 

In addition, as we face new threats and challenges, a properly balanced military force will also have a planned reserve capability in order to deal with unforeseen contingencies.

 

In recent years, our Armed Forces have been too often over-stretched because there was no such reserve.

 

It therefore makes absolutely no sense for Hoon to reduce manpower and it is pointless developing a war –winning capability if we have insufficient numbers of soldiers to win the subsequent peace.

 

Our Armed Forces have been starved of resources for too long.

 

In every Defence Review-, which incidentally seems to happen with increasing frequency- the Secretary of State for Defence tries to justify successive reductions against promised future technological enhancements. But history teaches us that it is men, not weapons who win wars-and ultimately the peace

 

Last year, despite already serious under-manning in the Army, the Treasury stopped all recruitment.

 

It is hard to quantify the effect that such a cynical abuse of political power and continuing over-stretch are having on commitment and morale.

 

Traditionally, the regimental system enables soldiers to withstand much hardship, yet even this is now under threat with plans to amalgamate old established county regiments.

 

Such reforms will undoubtedly weaken the ties of loyalty and comradeship that

That causes men to fight in battle, and so willingly risk their lives in peacekeeping.

 

Of course, Armed Forces must re-equip and restructure in order to meet the demands of modern war and many of the future Army structure changes make good sense.

 

But the demands of the battlefield are enduring, and victory depends upon the quality and commitment of our soldiers, sailors and airman.

 

That is why they need to be supported not merely with words but materially-particularly if Tony Blair truly wishes to continue his strategy of military intervention across the world.

 

General Sir Michael Rose is Former Commanding Officer of the SAS who led the UN Forces in Bosnia.

 

*

13th October,2007

 

So You Want Out Of The EU

 

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British  (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

*

*

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

 

 

VOTE

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

ADDED NOV 1-2015

 

 

 

 

BRITISH FORCES (OVERSEAS) BULLETINS

 

 

B F 1-BLAIR'SCRAPED THE BARREL' TO JUSTIFY INVASION OF IRAQ****B F 2-The Security Services and the Safety of YOUR REALM****B F 3-It's impossible to win a conflict without enough men on the ground.****B F 4-FIVE WARS BLAIR TO REDUCE OUR ILLUSTRIOUS FIGHTING REGIMENTS****B F5-The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island's Defenders of Freedom now at further RISK!**** B F 6-IRAQ NOT WORTH THE LIFE OF ANOTHER BRITISH SOLDIER****B F 7-Former Chief of Defence Intelligence supports Whistleblowers****B F 8-TONY BLAIR-THE MAN WHO NEVER DID-YET!****B F 9- The JUSTIFICATION for WAR offered by MR BLAIR may have been the  WRONG ONE, but it was a JUST WAR-says DAILY TELEGRAPH ****.  B F 10-A TROOPER and a TRAVESTY of JUSTICE****B F 11-House of Commons must REGAIN its RESPONSIBILITY****B F 12-Why wont Mr Ingram realise he CANNOT compare FUNDING of ARMY RECRUITMENT TRAINING with PRIVATE CORPORATIONS****B 490-TONY BLAIR WILL NOT ADMIT INVASION OF IRAQ MADE BRITAIN VULNERABLE TO TERRORIST ATTACK-ALMOST EVERYONE KNOWS-IT DID!****B484-ABANDONED HEROES FIGHTING AND DYING ON 2 AN HOUR-IRAQ-AFGHANISTAN-AND OTHER CONFLICTS-WHY?****B492-TELL THE TRUTH!-MR BLAIR-OF HOW LONG OUR TROOPS WILL REMAIN IN AFGHANISTAN****B 499-Three more British deaths take Afghan toll to 19 in 6 days.****B 501-SADDAM HAD NO LINK TO AL QAEDA-says THE SENATE of the USA***B 504-BLAIR CONFESSES HIS FAULTS BUT STILL CONTINUES WITH HIS DISASTROUS POLICIES.****

 

 

[OVER THE PAST 12 YEARS  WE HAVE SHOWN A GREAT NUMBER OF BULLETINS WITH REGARD TO OUR ARMED SERVICES WHO WERE NOT ALWAYS GIVEN THE APPROPRIATE TOOLS TO DO THE JOB- MR HOON-COMES TO MIND-SHORTAGE OF BODY ARMOUR AND SUITABLE AND SAFE TRANSPORT. THE ABOVE ARTICLES ARE BUT A FEW OF THE MANY BUT WE WILL ADD TO THE LIST OVER THE FOLLOWING WEEKS. A VISIT TO IRAQ FILE & BULLETIN FILE WILL REVEAL MUCH INFORMATION.]

 

 

FOR FURTHER INFO GO TO:

PT 2/ PT3/PT4/PT5/PT6

 

 

 

 

*

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her 9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

 http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.html

 

 

*

 KNOWN GOOD GUYS UNDER SUSPICION OF BEING PROVOCATEURS ON BEHALF OF THE ILLUMINATI.

As we have explained elsewhere it is this typical situation which we must fear the most and expect this insidious practice of the satanic ILLUMINATI who wish to ensure where possible that it is THEIR STOOGE in CONTROL! within their ENEMIES camp.  We suspect that there are many more within UKIP [-possibly even MEP's-one talking about a deal with the Conservative party ] and  BNP and other declared advocates across the political spectrum pursuing  FREEDOM! and NATION STATE! who will soon share the space below.

There are always great difficulty in these matters and one can only go on the actions and contacts of the individuals involved.

There can be no greater or more heinous crime imaginable than for one to betray the TRUST of a COMRADE fighting for a JUST! and GOOD CAUSE!

'It is said: 'No man can justly censure or condemn another, because indeed no man truly knows another'

But what we are considering is at a time when those who intend to destroy the majority of mankind and make serfs of the majority allowed to live and  It is a WAR we are FIGHTING for SURVIVAL! and in such circumstances a persons ACTIONS or lack of ACTION! are the ONLY basis on which one can JUDGE! another.

Finally it is up to the membership of UKIP and BNP to purge THEIR PARTY of the TRAITORS within and look for those who have the fire in their belly to carry the party forward to VICTORY!

 

MAY-2012

 

 

*

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

*