The Justification for War offered by Mr Blair may have
been the wrong one, but it was a Just War –says Daily Telegraph.
The
Leader column in the Daily Telegraph on Thursday the 4th
October
2004. stated that though the justification for the Iraq War offered by Mr Blair
may have been a wrong one, nevertheless it was a Just War.
We have no quarrel with their description of Saddam and
that he should have been toppled but only with the means used in order to
achieve it.
In
modern times there have been many instances where leaders of tyrannical regimes
have been removed by other methods than by going to war. It is said that it would have been possible
to ignore International Law and simply send a snatch squad into Iraq to kidnap
Saddam Hussein.
Other
nations have adopted similar methods in the past to remove or bring to justice
those guilty of crimes against humanity.
We
do not say that these methods are right but if the intention of Mr Bush and Mr
Blair was to topple Saddam why did they not use other methods to depose him
rather than invade his country, after having both lied to their People.
Because
of the illegal action of Tony Blair sixty-seven families are grieving their
lost ones who gave their lives in the belief that their country ‘s overseas
territories were threatened by WDM’s.
They were not told that the sole purpose of the war was
to topple a dictator.
We expect to hear from sections of the media that it is
the duty of the soldier to place his life at risk even if the reasons for war
were a pack of lies.
Well
we are not in the dark ages we are in the 21st century and all who
serve with the H.M Forces are subjects of the Queen and NOT servants of Tony
Blair.
As
we have said many times our Prime Minister has acknowledged that he is OUR
Servant. If that is so our servicemen and any subject of these Islands have the
right to question their government as to why we must go to war.
If
the statement of the centuries old Daily Telegraph is accepted into precedent then we can look forward to
many more wars as other States around the world will be pleased to be offered
an example of what the Telegraph calls honourable conduct by Tony Blair.
In
the words of the world’s greatest philosopher of over two and a half millennium
ago the definitions of ‘Unjust’ and ‘Just’ are of assistance in
answering our contention that the War on Iraq was an Unjust act of aggression.
‘Unjust’
is (a) the illegal (b) the unfair.
‘Just’
is (a) the legal (b) the fair.
For
the purposes of our case we will use the term ‘Just’
Using
this analysis the Daily Telegraph
has
stated that it was a Just to go to war to topple Saddam Hussein.
Therefore
in using the term ‘Just’ they are saying that it was ‘legal and fair’ to invade
Iraq.
We
can therefore say that the Daily Telegraph says:
It
was Legal and Fair: to destroy a countries infrastructure.
It
was Legal and Fair: To kill thousands of Iraqi citizens –many women and children.
It
was Legal and Fair: to have NO effective plan for the implementation of Law and Order.
It
was Legal and Fair: to have No effective plan for
the restoration of vital services –water, electricity etc.
It
was Legal and Fair: to put at risk its oil production for which it depends upon for its
economic survival.
It
was Legal and Fair: to invade a country in order to remove its Head of State.
It
was Legal and Fair: to
risk the lives of our troops by sending them into battle without the vital
equipment which cost lives and there would have been countless more lives lost
if there had been chemical and biological weapons as Mr Blair had
categorically stated to our House of Commons.
It
was Legal and Fair: to gain the authority for the war from the House
of Commons by deliberate deceit and lies with the connivance of the
Intelligence Service and others within the Government.
It
was Legal and Fair: to destroy an honourable civil servant who
placed his love for his country, and his life in defence of Truth.
It
was Legal and Fair: to
hound out of their jobs those who have spoken the truth
about sexed up dossier and other lies and deceit at the centre of the Blair
Government.
We could fill many more pages of why in the Daily
Telegraph’s view it was Legal and Fair to invade Iraq to topple
Saddam Hussein-But then it is as they say in not so many words ‘the Ends
justifies the Means’.
Isn’t this the justification for war we heard on the
Continent over sixty –six years from the Fascist dictators? Haven’t our
politicians learned anything since then?
WE
British have taught the World a dangerous lesson. One
day soon someone will have regretted changing the rules of war in the
International arena.
All
we ask is who is next?
*
POSTSCRIPT
Well
we NOW have the answer in the Daily
Telegraph of 9th October 2004.
Their
leader column leads with:
‘Tony
Blair cannot really want to invade Africa’
We answer why not- your recent
Leader acclaimed the moral wisdom of your Tony Blair as a Statesman in toppling
Saddam Hussein.
Now you have unwittingly endorsed Tony Blair in his crusade to
save Africa.
You opened the door of
opportunity for our so called ‘ Servant of the People ‘- and we leave you to find a
way to get yourself out of this mess?
Best of Luck
*
Will we ever know if there had been any hope of
securing the release of Ken Bigley? We hope that there was because to believe not
would be to disbelieve that even in the most evil of men with any religious belief there would be hope
of mercy.
*
* *
*
13th October,2007
So You Want Out Of The EU
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of
EU CITIZENSHIP
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout
Details from petition
creator
With the signing of
the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were
given
DUAL CITIZENSHIP
-both
EUROPEAN and
BRITISH
The extra tier of
citizenship was thrust upon the people without their
consent -and in many cases knowledge.
The PEOPLE of GREAT
BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out
of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The
GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who
have opted out with
BRITISH
DOCUMENTATION
-only such as
British (not EU) passports, driving licences
and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT
APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF
EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
*
*
*
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
VOTE
MAY -2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
Home Rule for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE for
ENGLAND
*
MAY/07
[All underlined words have a separate
bulletin]
ADDED NOV 1-2015
*
The
Queen,
Treason
and the
Coronation
oath
Together
with
Churchill,
King
George
VI saved
our
nation;
he was a
Monarch
to be
proud
of. But
his
daughter
the
Queen is
the only
monarch
to have
broken
all her
coronation
oaths,
by
signing
these
six
treaties
that
abolish
our
common
law, the
British
Constitution,
the
British
and
English
nations,
and our
sovereignty.
She has
also
committed
treason,
together
with
co-signatories
Ted
Heath,
Margaret
Thatcher,
John
Major,
Tony
Blair
and
Gordon
Brown.
Realising
that
under
the five
Treason
Acts
they
should
already
be
hanging
by the
neck
until
dead,
Tony
Blair
and the
Queen
signed
the
Crime
and
Disorder
Act,
1998,
which
secretly
abolished
much of
the
crime of
treason
(s36.3)
and
reduced
the
penalty
to life
imprisonment
- they
didn't
tell the
MP's
what
they had
just
voted
for.
1.4
million
British
Servicemen
gave
their
lives
for our
independence.
The
Queen
has
thrown
their
sacrifices
away and
made
them
worthless.
At
no
physical
risk to
herself,
she
could
have
fulfilled
her oath
and duty
as a
constitutional
check
and
balance,
by
refusing
to sign
the six
treaties
until an
in/out
referendum
had been
held. In
the
unlikely
event
the vote
went
against
her, she
was even
more
unlikely
to lose
her
crown
(not her
life or
a limb),
and
would
keep her
£9
billion
plus
palaces
either
way.
Those
servicemen's
lives
would
still
have
meant
something.
But she
was
always
keen to
sign;
and said
in
advance
she
would
sign the
last
treaty.
Princes
Charles,
William
or Harry
can now
never be
King.
You
can't
have a
King
without
a
Kingdom:
they can
only be
princes
of a
region
(principality)
within
Europe.
King
Edward
8th was
forced
to
abdicate
because
he was
too
overt as
a German
Nazi
supporter.
Mrs
Simpson's
divorce
was
merely
the
excuse.
The
Royal
Family
is a
German
Family -
real
surname
Saxe-Coburg Gotha.
Windsor
is an
adopted
surname.
All four
of
Prince
Phillip's
sisters
married
high
ranking
German
Nazis.
After
they
lost the
war the
EU was
switched
from a
Nazi
basis to
a
communist
basis.
Between
the ages
of 12
and 22
Queen
Elisabeth's
political
and
constitutional
tutor
was Sir
Henry
Martin,
a Fabian
Communist.
It seems
clear
she was
well
trained
for her
subversion
and
treason.
Because
she
waves
and
smiles
at us
most are
fooled
into
thinking
she's
lovely;
in fact
the
Queen is
a member
of the
Illuminati,
a
Bilderberger,
head of
Freemasonry,
is
wholly
pro the
(German)
EU, and
has
abolished
this
nation
with
ruthless
determination.
It is so
obvious
she
cares
nothing
for
Britain
or the
British.
The
Queen's
aspirations
are not
ours;
she
clearly
serves a
much
darker
master;
the
faith
she
defends
cannot
be the
one we
think it
is. King
George
VI, the
one
recent
monarch
not
indoctrinated
with
Nazi or
Communist
philosophy,
must be
turning
over in
his
grave.
I
ask that
the law
be
enforced,
and the
Queen be
tried
for
treason
before
12
honest
people,
and not
by our
corrupt
judges.
And that
the
illegal
section
36.3
Crime
and
Disorder
Act be
declared
null and
void, so
that she
can hang
by the
neck
till
dead.
The new
EU
Hitler
doesn't
have to
get
elected
Its
worth
noting
that
Adolf
Hitler
first
had to
get
elected,
if on a
35%
minority
vote,
and then
get his
Enabling
Act
passed.
An EU
dictator
has no
such
problems.
Our EU
rulers
do not
submit
themselves
for
election
now. And
the
Queen
has
already
signed
the
Enabling
Act
(Civil
Contingencies
Act
2004).
The EU's
Hitler
will
have a
much
easier
rise to
power,
and will
have the
formerly
British
and
French
nuclear
weapons
from day
one.
Adolf
Hitler
killed
54
million
people.
The EU's
dictator
could
kill a
billion
at the
touch of
a
button,
with no
democratic
checks
and
balances
to
answer
to. How
could
any
aspiring
dictator
resist
the EU
opportunity?
For more
details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk
http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.html |
|
|
*
*
*