- (1994 -Official Website - JAN-PT1 -2019 )--

          JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019          JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019        

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019          JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 5-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 6-2019          JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-PAGE 2-2019

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*
AT LONG LAST!-THE FIGHT BACK-TO A

TRUE BREXIT.

FOR

17.4 MILLION

 BREXITEERS

WHO VOTED TO

LEAVE

HITLER'S PLANNED SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

Nigel Farage backs new BREXIT PARTY and warns Theresa May ...

Daily Mail‎ - 4 hours ago
Nigel Farage has endorsed a brand new pro-Brexit political party and .... Mr Farage told the Sun on Sunday: 'There is huge demand for a party ...

 

SUNDAY,JANUARY 20, 2019

H.F.1782

*

WE ARE AN ISLAND PEOPLE

WITH  A LONG INHERITANCE

OF

PERSONAL FREEDOM

 

AND  OF

COUNTRY

 

WE ACKNOWLEDGE

A

PEOPLE'S

PARLIAMENT.

WE ARE THE MASTERS

 

AND

 

WE MUST NOT SURRENDER OUR

HISTORIC

 

"RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES

OF

ENGLISHMEN"

 

TO OUR SERVANTS.

 

THE FIGHT BACK STARTS

NOW!

UNDER MAGNA CARTA CLAUSE 60 WHERE OUR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY IS IN GREAT DANGER IT IS PERMITTED TO TAKE UP ARMS TO PROTECT YOUR INHERITANCE.

Cromwell's Breach With Parliament in September,1654

...In every Government there must be something fundamental-like Magna Carta, which should be unalterable. There was something special in this speech very like the harangues of Elizabeth the First to her independent-minded Parliaments...But there is something of the tone of Parliament's apologies to James I .noticeable in the Protector's reference to Magna Carta. What was fundamental in the government of England?  That had been the issue of the whole struggle of the century; and Cromwell's vision of "healing and settling" could not yet be realised, because men were not yet anything like agreed upon the point...  At the end of five months, reckoning four weeks to a month - that is to say, the earliest date at which the constitution allowed him to do so-Cromwell dissolved Parliament.  "Instead of peace and settlement... dissettlement and division," , he told them, had been the sole product of their sittings. [AS in our day when the issue of FREEDOM is uppermost in  patriotic minds.]

HISTORY OF ENGLAND

PART II :  1485-1688

SHEARMAN AND PLASKITT

UNIVERSITY TUTORIAL PRESS LTD

FOXTON CAMBRIDGE

1929.

*

SUNDAY, JANUARY 20, 2018

 

 

 

SCOTLAND - HAS ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT

-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

[EACH WORD ABOVE HAS A SEPARATE BULLETIN.  -10-TOTAL-]

H.F.1782\1

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

st.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

BULLETINS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

 

 

We Germans have insulted Britain. How can we have forgotten the huge debt we owe you.

 

News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

As MARCH 29 looms closer, here in Germany, rabid anti-British sentiment is part of the daily discourse.

The chattering classes-politicians and pundits alike-are urging our Angela Merkel, to harden her line towards the United Kingdom after suggestions that she was prepared to throw Theresa May a lifeline. Indeed last week Annegret Kramp -Karrenbauer, Merkel's successor -in-waiting calls for Britain to scrap Brexit completely. Germans are far from alone in this attitude. In the wake of the momentous Commons defeat for your Prime Minister's Brexit strategy, the European Commission twisted the thumbscrews still further. have been unshakable

Michel Barnier, the EU's Brexit negotiator, suggested it was time for the EU to abandon its 'red lines' over ending freedom of movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

 Yet these issues have been unshakable stipulations for the British since the beginning of talks. To casually propose dumping them in this way is insulting to your country.

 Regret

The French president, Emmanuel Macron, was, regrettably, similarly dismissive when he said that

 Brexit

was a

BRITISH PROBLEM

and one it would have to solve on its own. Such blinkered and sour responses are, in my view, wrong-headed. They ignore the great debt that Germany, and the whole Continent, owes our friends across the Channel.

However much we in Europe regret your decision  to leave our Community, we must always remember that, throughout your history, independence and sovereignty have been

PARAMOUNT.

Germany in particular should tread lightly when it comes to dealing with

YOUR PROUD NATION.

It was Great Britain that first stood up to Hitler in 1939. And it was Britain that opened its doors to the thousands of Jew-doors to the thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing certain death during the Holocaust.

Put simply, there would be no free Europe without you and the bloody sacrifice you made to rescue the Continent. This plain fact has not always been a popular one, of course. The truth is that there has been a long tradition of policies aimed at excluding the British Isles from Europe, most notably those of French president Charles De Gaulle.

After the war, inspired by dreams of the medieval empire that stretched across  the Continent under Charlemagne, De Gaulle poured his energy into setting up the European economic Community -the forerunner of the EU.

But when Britain enquired about membership in the early Sixties, his answer was an emphatic 'Non' Thanks to De Gaulle's opposition, it took more than a decade for the UK to be accepted. And the driving force for unity for welcoming British membership with open arms was the German chancellor of the Sixties, Konrad Adenauer.

For that, ultimately, we can thank the QUEEN...

[[TREASON]

STYLE...

...Seen from that perspective it's imperative that Brexit is achieved with a degree of aplomb and decorum. At this crucial moment. Europe must concede enough to let the UK leave with head held high-and do it in style.

If instead, our leaders continue to treat the British People with contempt, we will wreck those great ties between our countries that have been painstakingly created over many generations.

 Our societies have always thrived on mutual respect and admiration. We are brothers and sisters...and this family squabble has

GONE TOO FAR

 It is time for Chancellor Merkel to show other European leaders the way and for them to start treating your country as it deserves -with our

 

RESPECT and GRATITUDE.

*  *  *

This considerable  and most erudite  yet controversial and compelling article appears at a most crucial moment, in our long island history, to recover our once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

-To be completed shortly-in the meantime for the complete work click ]

Here!

STATEMENT

In Alexander Von Schoenburg's own words' a real statesman would kindle Adenauer's historic vision of a federation [of free nation states ]and not some kind of bloated super-state-a confederation that does not neglect the historical and free peculiarities of it's members-none of this is impossible.'

This statement  appears to be that of a future GREXIT leader-don't you think?

Alexander Von Schoenburg's  mea culpa on behalf of his country has justified the 'hard-stance 'of Brexiteers particularly those such as

JACOB REES-MOGG

AND

The other 17.4 miilion who voted in JUNE 2016

TO

LEAVE THE EU

The soon to be

SUPER STATE

AS SOON AS POSSIBLE

 UKIP and the later the DAILY MAIL deserted the battleground at a vital and crucial moment which gave succour to our enemies at home and within the EU. AS a result the present shambles we now see ourselves in with only weeks until our EXIT from the BIG BROTHER EUROPEAN UNION.

*  *  *

[We were against entry to

Hitler's plan for Europe

in 1972 and again in 1975.]

[WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE]

[ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS EITHER OURS OR OTHER CONTRIBUTORS.]

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

 

H.F.1784

 

 

 

DEFENCE OF THE REALM.

 

 

 

THE MOST PARAMOUNT ISSUE IS THE SECURITY

OF

THE REALM

ELATEST!N

 

SECURITY

SECURITY OF THE REALM

The security and defence threat posed by [FRAU] May's [so-called] Brexit deal ...

JANUARY  11,2019

H.F.1777

 

TREASON

 

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence'

EDMUND BURKE

comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

HOW CAN YOU TRUST THEM

ONLY A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP TO A TRUE BREXIT BELIEVER CAN ENSURE A CLEAN BREAK

FROM

HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY MUST BE IN OUR HANDS AS A FAMILY OF NATION STATES IN OUR OWN ISLAND HOME. IT IS A LEGACY FROM THE PAST THAT MUST BE HANDED INTACT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS-IT IS NOT OURS TO DISREGARD AS TRAITORS WITHIN IN OUR GOVERNMENT  AND CIVIL SERVICE DID SO IN 1970's . 

NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN HANDED THE LEADERSHIP TO WINSTON CHURCHILL in 1940. SO LIKEWISE THERESA MAY SHOULD HAND THE LEADERSHIP IN 2018 TO A TRUE BREXITEER TO ENSURE THAT

JUSTICE IS DONE!

SEPTEMBER 6,2018

H.F.1525/1

 *
 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN

 

 

 

Sorry folks but I have to mention the B-word.

 

 

 

 

 

News for DAILY MAIL-RICHARD LITTLEJOHN-Sorry folks but I have to mention the B-word.

 

ACCORDING to a new 'survey' made up for CHANNEL 4 to promote a television programme the word 'BREXIT' , is uttered more than 500 million times a day in BRITAIN

Not in our house it isn't

To paraphrase Basil Fawlty, I may have mentioned the B-word once, but I think I got away with it

Like most of youif I never heard the word again, it would be too soon. For a couple of glorious weeks over Christmas and New Year  holiday, it was almost possible to avoid Brexit altogether if you tried hard enough.

The hope was that the season of

PEACE AND GOODWILL

would rub off on the political class. Once back with their families, their friends and their constituents, surely they would come to their senses.

Fat chance of that, so forgive me for having to return to the subject

When Parliament reassembled this week, it quickly became apparent that the brief cessation of hostilities would be resuming more fiercely than ever.

Not that there was a proper ceasefire, just that most sensible people were taking no notice whatsoever.  There was never any chance that MPs would all start singing

Silent Night

in perfect harmony and emerge from their trenches for a friendly game of football.

 The sole footballing analogy came from a senior Conservative who compared Mother Theresa to a player trying to run down the clock in the dying minutes of a game.

Unfortunately Theresa follows cricket, not football. Otherwise she would realise that you only dribble the ball to the corner flag in the 89th minute to protect a one -goal lead, not when you're losing

7.1.

Yet she persists stubbornly with her

DISMAL-DEFEATEST

BREXIT-IN-NAME-ONLY 'DEAL'

even though it pleases

NOBODY.

[There can be little doubt that Theresa May's friend Angela Merkel has made it clear that there should be no backtracking and with Germany entering a damaging recession in the months ahead this should have been the ideal time for Theresa May to do what she

PROMISED

BREXIT MEANS BREXIT

NO DEAL IS BETTER THAN A BAD DEAL.

The bookies who are rarely wrong give it a 16/1 chance of getting through the Commons.

Leavers won't vote for it

Remainers won't vote for it

DUP won't vote for it

Labour won't vote for it

Most members of the Cabinet wouldn't vote for it, either, if they didn't-like former Brexiteer Michael Gove -fancy their chances of becoming Prime Minister when the music stops and Mrs May finally swallows the cyanide pill.

With a few honourable exceptions, no one in Parliament comes out of this well, least of all that preening puff adder John Bercow, who has demeaned his office and betrayed centuries of neutrality in the Speaker's chair by ripping up the rule book to help those headbangers who

WANT TO STOP ANY FORM OF BREXIT ALTOGETHER.

If Bercow had attempted this treacherous coup in an earlier period of history, he'd have been dragged off to the Tower for execution and his head displayed on a spike at the entrance to the Palace of Westminster, pour encourager les autres - as they don't say in Sunderland.

All this garbage about protecting Parliament is an intelligence-insulting smokescreen. When we voted to take back

CONTROL OF OUR OWN LAWMAKING

We didn't vote to give MPs the power to overturn the

RESULT OF THE REFERENDUM.

That's how deceitful and self-serving most of our politicians really are.

Once they get into office, they hold the electorate, the people who pay their wages, in complete contempt...

...MORE TO FOLLOW

 We've had the spectacle of Dominic Grievance, until fairly recently of one of the country's most senior law officers, scouring the small print for any obscure clause which can be deployed to scupper  Brexit. His latest wheeze, in concert with Labour's ghastly Pixie Balls-Cooper (who still hasn't fulfilled her promise to take Syrian refugees into one of her homes.), is an attempt to deny the Government tax-raising powers and disrupt the Budget. And where did he get the idea from? In the U.S, Donald Trump is currently refusing to sign government spending bills unless Congress agrees to provide the money to build a wall along the Mexican border.

The fundamental difference is that Trump is trying to implement a firm promise he made the American people during his election campaign.

What Grieve, Cooper and the rest of the Remainiacs are attempting to thwart the domcratically expressed will of the BRITISH PEOPLE, in defiance of both their parties'

MANIFESTO PLEDGES

At the 2017 General Election, the Conservatives and Labour stood on a platform guaranteeing to

RESPECT THE RESULT OF. THE REFERENDUM,

IN WHICH

17.4 MILLION PEOPLE VOTED LEAVE.

Neither party now has any intention of doing

WHAT THEY PROMISED.

Once upon a time (it really does seem like a lifetime ago, Mrs May assured us that

'NO DEAL was BETTER than a BAD DEAL'

Now she tells us

 it IS'

HER DEAL or NO BREXIT'...

 And there's no guarantee that a second General Election would change anything  when it comes to Brexit.

After all, both Labour and the Conservatives have reneged on their last manifesto commitments.

My own well-known preference has always been a , either

'NO DEAL' BREXIT

on

WTO TERMS

But that's not going to happen either.

I've reluctantly accepted that there will have to be some kind of compromise. But with everyone so bitterly entrenched and the PM clinging to the wreckage of her doomed 'deal', I honestly can't see  where it's going to come from.

 

BACK in the autumn

 I assumed that a shabby carve-up had already been agreed and it would soon be all over bar the shouting, much to everyone's relief, after a bit of patronising political theatre designed to pull the wool over our eyes.

I GOT THAT WRONG.

What we have learned from this tawdry, demeaning episode in our nation's history is that we no longer live in a proper functioning democracy'

The arrogant political class despise the wider  electorate and believe they are our

MASTERS

BUT

NOT OUR

SERVANTS.

I'm reminded yet again of the odious federalist Peter Mandelson's smug declaration 20 years ago that the 'era of the true representative democracy'

was coming to an end

HE WASN'T KIDDING

And of Ken Livingstone's best line:

'If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it,'

Look, I'm sorry to have added to the alleged 500 million mentions of

BREXIT

 TODAY

 

BUT SOMEONE'S GOT TO DO IT

Sadly, only one B-word comes to mind

IT'S

 

BETRAYAL.

 

News for DAILY MAIL-RICHARD LITTLEJOHN-Sorry folks but I have to mention the B-word.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

JANUARY 11,2019

H.F.1778

*

 

TORY GOVERNMENT USE

 " POLITICAL SMEAR UNIT"

  TO SMEAR OPPONENTS  OF THE PARTY SUCH  AS  THE LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION  -JEREMY CORBYN ...

 

The Integrity Initiative has mobilized an international disinformation campaign across Europe. Now, with government and right-wing foundation money, this massive “political smear unit” is infiltrating the US.

By Max Blumenthal and Mark Ames

A bombshell domestic spy scandal has been unfolding in Britain, after hacked internal communications exposed a covert UK state military-intelligence psychological warfare operation targeting its own citizens and political figures in allied NATO countries under the cover of fighting “Russian disinformation.”

The leaked documents revealed a secret network of spies, prominent journalists and think-tanks colluding under the umbrella of a group called “Integrity Initiative” to shape domestic opinion—and to smear political opponents of the right-wing Tory government, including the leader of the opposition Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn.

Until now, this Integrity Initiative domestic spy scandal has been ignored in the American media, perhaps because it has mostly involved British names. But it is clear that the influence operation has already been activated in the US. Hacked documents reveal that the Integrity Initiative is cultivating powerful allies inside the State Department, top DC think tanks, the FBI and the DHS, where it has gained access to Katharine Gorka and her husband, the fascist-linked cable news pundit Sebastian Gorka.

The Integrity Initiative has spelled out plans to expand its network across the US, meddling in American politics and recruiting “a new generation of Russia watchers” behind the false guise of a non-partisan charity. Moreover, the group has hired one of the most notorious American “perception management” specialists, John Rendon, to train its clusters of pundits and cultivate relationships with the media.

Back in the UK, Member of Parliament Chris Williamson has clamored for an investigation into the Integrity Initiative’s abuse of public money.

In a recent editorial, Williamson drew a direct parallel between the group’s collaboration with journalists and surreptitious payments the CIA made to reporters during the Cold War.

“These tactics resemble those deployed by the CIA in Operation Mockingbird that was launched at the height of the cold war in the early 1950s. Its aims included using the mainstream news media as a propaganda tool,” Williamson wrote.

“They manipulated the news agenda by recruiting leading journalists to write stories with the express purpose of influencing public opinion in a particular way,” the Labour parliamentarian continued. “Now it seems the British Establishment have dusted off the CIA’s old playbook and is intent on giving it another outing on this side of the Atlantic.”

Unmasking a British military-intelligence smear machine

The existence of the Integrity Initiative was virtually unknown until this November, when the email servers of a previously obscure British think tank called the Institute for Statecraft were hacked, prompting allegations of Russian intrusion. When the group’s internal documents appeared at a website hosted by Anonymous Europe, the public learned of a covert propaganda network seed-funded to the tune of over $2 million dollars by the Tory-controlled UK Foreign Office, and run largely by military-intelligence officers.

Through a series of cash inducements, off the record briefings and all-day conferences, the Integrity Initiative has sought to organize journalists across the West into an international echo chamber hyping up the supposed threat of Russian disinformation—and to defame politicians and journalists critical of this new Cold War campaign. 

A bid for funding submitted by the Integrity Initiative in 2017 to the British Ministry of Defense promised to deliver a “tougher stance on Russia” by arranging for “more information published in the media on the threat of Russian active measures.”

The Integrity Initiative has also worked through its fronts in the media to smear political figures perceived as a threat to its militaristic agenda. Its targets have included a Spanish Department of Homeland Security appointee, Pedro Banos, whose nomination was scuttled thanks a media blitz it secretly orchestrated; Jeremy Corbyn, whom the outfit and its media cutouts painted as a useful idiot of Russia; and a Scottish member of parliament, Neil Findlay, whom one of its closest media allies accused of adopting “Kremlin messaging” for daring to protest the official visit of the far-right Ukrainian politician Andriy Parubiy — the founder of two neo-Nazi parties and author of a white nationalist memoir, “View From The Right.”

These smear campaigns and many more surreptitiously orchestrated by the Integrity Initiative offer a disturbing preview of the reactionary politics it plans to inject into an already toxic American political environment.

Lessons from “the man who sold the war”

A newly released Integrity Initiative document reveals that the outfit plans an aggressive expansion across the US.

The Integrity Initiative claims to have already established a “simple office” in Washington DC, though it does not say where. It also boasts of partnerships with top DC think tanks like the Atlantic Council, the Center for European Policy Analysis, CNA, and close relationships with US officials.

A major hub of Integrity Initiative influence is the State Department’s Global Engagement Center, a de facto US government propaganda operation that was established by President Barack Obama to battle online ISIS recruitment, but which was rapidly repurposed to counter Russian disinformation following the election of Trump.

The Integrity Initiative has also recruited one of the most infamous American PR men to organize its clusters of journalists and political figures.

He is John Rendon, best known as “The Man Who Sold The War” — several wars, in fact, but most notoriously the Iraq invasion. Rendon was the self-described “information warrior” who planted fake news in the major US-UK media about non-existent WMD threats. With deep ties to the CIA and other military-intelligence agencies, his PR firm was paid $100 million to organize and sell Ahmed Chalabi’s Iraqi National Congress. In 2002, the New York Times exposed a Pentagon program using Rendon to plant “disinformation” — including “false stories” and “the blackest of black PR” — in media outlets around the world, in order to shape public opinion and sell the Iraq invasion.

John Rendon (left) with Maj. Gen. Michael Snodgrass, US Africa Command Chief of Staff (photo by US Africom Public Affairs)

Journalist James Bamford outlined a catalogue of disinformation feats Rendon performed for the Pentagon, such as identifying “the biases of specific journalists and potentially obtain an understanding of their allegiances, including the possibility of specific relationships and sponsorships.” Bamford also found proposals and programs Rendon was involved in that aimed to “’coerce’ foreign journalists and plant false information overseas… [and] find ways to ‘punish’ those who convey the ‘wrong message.’”

These tactics seem particularly relevant to his work with the Integrity Initiative, especially considering the internal documents that reveal further Rendon-style plans to produce reports and studies to be “fed anonymously into local media.” (Among the outlets listed as friendly hosts in Integrity Initiative internal memos are Buzzfeed and El Pais, the center-left Spanish daily.)

Keeping up with the Gorkas

Internal documents also refer to interactions between Integrity Initiative Director Chris Donnelly and top Trump officials like Katharine Gorka, a vehemently anti-Muslim Department of Homeland Security official, as well as her husband, Sebastian, who earned right-wing fame during his brief tenure in Trump’s White House.

The latter Gorka is an open supporter of the Hungarian Vitezi Rend, a proto-fascist order that collaborated with Nazi Germany during its occupation of Hungary. Following Trump’s election victory in 2016, Gorka appeared for televised interviews in a black Vitezi Rend uniform.

Sebastian Gorka, in Vitezi Rend garb, with his wife, Katharine, on Election Night

Gorka was among the first figures listed on an itinerary for Donnelly to Washington this September 18 to 22. The itinerary indicates that the two had breakfast before Donnelly delivered a presentation on “Mapping Russian Influence Activities” at the federally funded military research center, CNA.

According to the itinerary, Donnelly was granted access to Pentagon officials like Mara Karlin, an up-and-coming neoconservative cadre, and John McCain Institute executive director Kurt Volker, another neoconservative operative who also serves as the US Special Representative for Ukraine. Numerous meetings with staffers inside the State Department’s Office of Global Engagement were also detailed.

A foreign agent in the State Department?

Of all the State Department officials named in Integrity Initiative documents, the one who appeared most frequently was Todd Leventhal. Leventhal has been a staffer at the State Department’s Global Engagement Center, boasting of “20 years of countering disinformation, misinformation, conspiracy theories, and urban legends.” In an April 2018 Integrity Initiative memo, he is listed as a current team member:

Funded to the tune of $160 million this year to beat back Russian disinformation with “counter-propaganda,” the State Department’s Global Engagement Center has refused to deny targeting American citizens with information warfare of its own. “My old job at the State Department was as chief propagandist,” confessed former Global Engagement Center Director Richard Stengel. “I’m not against propaganda. Every country does it and they have to do it to their own population and I don’t necessarily think it’s that awful.”

December 14, 2018

H.F.1776/1

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 19999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-

ENGLAND FILE

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 

BULLETINS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

 

 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

If we all push, 2019 will see final victory against the Khazarian mafia

Many signs indicate that 2019 will be a breakthrough year in the battle against the satan-worshiping Khazarian mafia.  Not only have mass arrests begun, but the mass-murdering part of the pharmacidical/medical establishment is finally being taken out as well.  Another obvious sign it is no longer business as usual comes from the fact that the U.S. military is being withdrawn from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.  And this time the U.S. government shutdown may actually result in formal bankruptcy procedures against the illegal corporate government that has occupied Washington, D.C. since 1871.

Let’s start with the U.S. military withdrawals, since they mark one of the biggest changes seen since the end of World War II when the perpetual war economy of the U.S. military-industrial complex began.  Pentagon sources say U.S. President Donald Trump’s Christmas Day visit to Iraq portends a pull-out from that country.  This follows withdrawal announcements from Afghanistan and Syria, as well as a ceasefire in Yemen.  We also note that almost all of the U.S. carrier groups are now at rest in their home ports.

Even more dramatically, the sources say, “Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan’s mission will be [to bring out in public view the] space force, bring troops home, release extraterrestrial and suppressed technology, close overseas bases, beat swords into plowshares and cut waste, while building a more lethal military.”  This means peace on earth and goodwill to all in a very real sense this holiday season.

The Pentagon sources also say the long U.S. government shutdown “makes it easy to arrest Deep-Staters embedded in the government.”  Furthermore, the first senior official to be publicly tried in “Nuremburg 2.0 will be ….
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Western civilization heading for a reboot over the holidays

Many signs and confirmations from highly placed sources indicate that a reboot of Western civilization is being planned for 2019.  The shutdown of the U.S. government over the holidays, for example, has nothing to do with building a wall, and everything to do with a financial reboot and upcoming military tribunals.

However, what is coming is about much more than just rounding up the criminals who hijacked and bankrupted the U.S. government—it is about fixing the problems besetting monotheism.

Since today is December 24th, Christmas Eve, it’s a good time to remind people of the historical truth behind this holiday.  The fact is that nobody knows when Jesus Christ was born, so the early Christian church hijacked the old solar New Year holiday and replaced the sun with Jesus.  Here’s the thing:  the sun sets at its most northern point on December 21st, the winter solstice.  For three days afterwards, it appears to set at the same place, and then on December 25th it starts setting further south, marking the birth of the solar New Year.  Thus, the Christian church needs to confess and tell people the truth about Christmas without in any way denying the wonderful teachings of Jesus Christ and Christianity.

The Jews, for their part, need to stop celebrating the xenophobic Hanukkah and realize that it is perfectly kosher to celebrate the solar New Year (unless they somehow think the Creator did not make the sun).  Anyway, Merry Christmas to the Christians and Muslims, and Merry Sunmas to everybody else.

These issues, together with discussions of updating the calendars to bring them back into line with the movements of the heavens on which they are based, are going to be part of a broad public discourse in the New Year.  That is because, at the highest levels of world power, a decision has been made to go ahead and rebuild the temple in Jerusalem and turn that city into an international free zone.  This is why 2019 is likely to be a year for the history books.

In preparation for these upcoming historical changes, U.S. troops are being withdrawn from various conflict zones in order to pave the way for world peace, CIA sources say.  Pentagon sources agree, adding that “U.S. President Donald Trump is pulling out of Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, and the Ukraine to terminate the Deep State and the Zionists, since the global currency reset requires peace and cessation of hostilities.”

European royal family sources concur that preparations are under way for a reboot of the global financial system.  The current U.S. dollar, Euro, and Japanese yen-based system is bankrupt and dysfunctional, these and other sources agree.  This is especially true of the United States, which has been bankrupt for quite some time now, the sources say.  That’s why this current U.S. government shutdown is going to lead to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Secret head of world finance, Cardinal Pell, fired and big changes coming

Last week Cardinal George Pell was found guilty of sexually abusing children by an Australian court and was subsequently fired by Pope Francis because he was “elderly.”
https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/12/12/cardinal-pell-top-advisor-pope-francis-found-guilty-historical-sexual-offenses

This is huge news in the secret world of finance, because Pell was the person in charge of financial matters at the Vatican and thus was a secret controller of most world government leaders, P2 Freemason and CIA sources say.  This is because when most world rulers take power, they get a visit from an official of the Vatican Bank who hands them a bank book with an astronomical number written in it (a billion dollars or more for big countries;  less for smaller countries).  They are then told, “Welcome to the world of the rich,” and are gently reminded that if they refuse to accept the money they will be “removed.”

This is the choice of silver or lead that has allowed the Vatican P2 Freemason Lodge, run by descendants of the Caesars, to secretly rule most world governments.  The 200 leaders who last week affirmed the fraudulent “carbon causes global warming” agreement are all slaves of this system, P2 Freemason and CIA sources agree.
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/12/14/18139402/cop24-climate-change-katowice-poland

Thus, the removal of the head of this secret control system will have huge repercussions for world finance and politics, depending on who is selected to replace him, and also depending on whether or not this secret system will be allowed to continue.

On that front, another huge news item (still not fully confirmed because it only comes from one royal family source) is that a new head of the Committee of 300, the secret government of the 13 ruling bloodline families, will take power next year.  This means Queen Elizabeth will be handing the committee reins to a younger person (hint:  not Charles and not William).

With this caveat in mind (i.e., only one source), here some excerpts from a statement by the soon-to-be-appointed new committee head:  “The 13 ruling bloodlines and I have had enough of this world and the minions charged with its curation.  All Sovereign Heads of State and all respective governments fired.  Ordo ab Chao.

The source also said, “Sir Alexander Younger at MI6 is already briefed, along with the Queen in London and the Emperor in Tokyo,” about this development.

The statement further read that, “The Habsburg dynasty and spin-offs—most criminally psychopathic—have …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Previous JCS Chairman

Ben:  Enjoy your weekly newsletters and I put more credence in you than any other source.  I’m curious about your comment in last newsletter, “as the previous JCS Chairman was Army.”  I believe you’ll find that Gen. Joseph Dunford was a United States Marine.  Means a lot to us former active duty Marines!  Have a great day.
I was referring to his predecessor Mike Dempsey, since Dunford is still JCS Chairman for now.
–BF

 

 
2018-12-31

*  *  *

ADDED

[FIND OUT MORE OF YOUR WORLD THAT WILL SHOCK

YOU.]

 

 

 

 

H.F.1769

*  *  *

 

 
LITTLEJOHN

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: May should have solved this 'migrant crisis' in 2016'

 Government ignored the problem of illegals crossing the Channel when it
first surfaced more than two-and-a-half years ago.

 

 

May should

have solved this migrant crisis in 2016

 

 

READERS of a certain age will remember the famous Eighties TV commercial for an insurance company that promised:

'We wont make a drama out of a crisis.'

The advert was intended to reassure customers that no matter what calamity might befall them, their problems would be solved with  the minimum of fuss.

Sadly, it's a message that has been lost on our modern generation of politicians, who are guaranteed to turn any minor hiccup into a full-blown, multi-million dollar Hollywood production number.

Not that there's anything minor about the current cross-Channel traffic in illegal immigrants coming ashore on the Kent coast in increasing numbers. Since the story exploded on a slow news day over Christmas, the Government  has gone into full headless chicken mode.

With great fanfare, Home Secretary Sajid Javid cuts short his family holiday in Africa to fly home and 'take control' of the situation. Everything is going according to the script. Javid arrives back in the middle of the night and changes from jeans and zipper jacket into his

'I'm in Charge' blue suit.

Hours later, he leaves his London home through a scrum of teleision reporters shouting inane questions, which they know perfectly well he has no intention of answering.

He convenes emergency meetings in Whitehall , then announcing a plan of action despite admitting in a newspaper article that, actually, there's very little he can do to stop the influx of Iranians and other assorted foreign nationals making their way across the Channel.

Javid could order the Navy to turn back any dinghy bound for Kent and return any passengers to France.

But he's already rejected an offer of naval assistance from Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson because he doesn't want Williamson to gain any political advantage at his expense.

STILL he has to be seen to be doing something, anything, to justify his dash back from his safari holiday. How long before Javid is filmed heading out to sea on the prow of a coastguard boat, like George Washington leading his troops across  the Delaware River during the American Revolution-only in a hi-viz jacket, rather than a general's uniform and tricorn hat.

Mind you, given this Government's track record of dealing with illegal immigration, a better analogy would be  Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet on the Titanic. All that matters is that Javid creates an impression of frantic activity, with him at the centre of it.

None of this would be necessary, of course, had the Government not ignored the problem of illegals crossing the Channel when it first surfaced more than two-and-a-half years ago.

It's not as if they didn't know it was happening. Between March and May 2016, there were at least eight recorded incidents of Border Force officials intercepting attempts to enter Britain by boat, via beaches in Kent and Sussex.

On May 31 that year, after 18 Albanians were picked up in a  rubber dinghy off Kent I wrote a spoof Shipping Forecast, illustrated by a Gary cartoon, of a country under siege from foreign nationals on a variety of inflatables.

 

Here's the flavour of it.

'Forties, Dogger. High chance of Iraqis, pretending to be Syrians, seen clinging to lilos near North Sea oil rig, bound for Bridlington...'

You get the idea. And still they kept coming , unhindered, throughout the summer. In September 2016, the Mail's Sue Reid hired out a small inflatable boat in France and sailed across the Channel to Dover. She passed a French coastguard vessel, a naval patrol and landed safely without anyone challenging her or asking to see her passport

Six days earlier, a group of illegal immigrants  had jumped off a private boat near Felixstowe, in Suffolk, and simply vanished.

In November 2016, I returned to the subject, when a man who claimed to be Iranian, but probably wasn't, was found rowing towards Britain in an inflatable kayak.

I wrote at the time: 'Instead of towing him back to Calais, he was rescued and given a lift to Croydon , where his asylum claim was processed. If the authorities aren't going to deport them to France, it will only encourage even more desperate illegals to attempt the hazardous journey in everything from children's paddling pools to inflatable armbands...

'I don't know if anyone has yet landed in Margate clinging to one of Del Boy's blow-up sex dolls, but, at any rate, it can only be a

MATTER OF TIME...

 

[We are only half-way through this article but we are sure you get the full picture of the ease in which illegals can enter our country, and the total failure of successive governments to stop it. But it is no surprise when you list the many failures of policy on matters essential to  the DEFENCE of the REALM and LAW and ORDER...  over decades, which we have shown on our website, that one wonders what use many of our politicians are when the same shortcomings arise year after year and decade after decade. The dilatory way that BREXIT -the voice of 17.4 million  People - has been handled, has confirmed this unfortunate trend.]

 

TO BE CONTINUED SHORTLY

TO BE CONTINUED SHORTLY

 

...WHAT he has inherited is merely the culmination of more than two-and-a-half years of incompetence, indifference and inaction.

So who was Home Secretary back then?

LET ME THINK

Oh yes. It was the same Home Secretary responsible for the Windrush scandal, for which her successor

HAD TO CARRY THE CAN.

The same Home Secretary who abandoned the

STOP AND SEARCH

leading to the explosion of knife crime in London

The same Home Secretary whose reputation as a 'safe pair of hands' propelled her into  10 Downing Street after Call Me Dave resigned, even though

SHE VOTED REMAIN

and spent the referendum campaign hiding behind the sofa.

The same Home Secretary who as Prime Minister ordered Javid to cut short his holiday to deal with something she should have nipped in the bud

TWO AND-A-HALF-YEARS AGO.

And still some people wonder how she managed to make such a

COMPLETE HORLICKS

 OF

BREXIT

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you

THERESA MAY,

Someone who can always be relied upon to make a

DRAMA OUT OF A CRISIS.

 

HAPPY NEW YEAR

*  *  *

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: May should have solved this 'migrant crisis' in 2016'

 

*  *  *

 

JANUARY 1,2019

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS-CHANGES OF FORM- ARE OURS]

 

H.F.1772

*
LITTLEJOHN

 

 As Marx said, history does have the ... A Very British Coup revolved around a conspiracy by the military, the media, big business and M15...

 

 

So this is what a very British coup looks like.

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

SOME of you will recall the novel

A Very British Coup,

subsequently made into an award-winning television series on Channel 4.

It was written by Labour MP Chris Mullin, published in 1982, and revolved around a conspiracy by the

MILITARY-THE MEDIA-BIG BUSINESS-M15

to bring down a Left-wing government.

At the time, the plot was entirely credible, since Britain was riven by strikes and revolution was in the air. I read the book as a young labour and industrial correspondent, and it made sense to me.

 The Bennites were in the ascendancy, Margaret Thatcher was horribly unpopular and it looked as if the wizened Hampstead Leftie Michael Foot-Worzel Gummidge, as Private Eye dubbed him-would be our next Prime Minister.

Mullin's assumptions were based  on hard fact. In the Seventies there had been well-founded reports about the Establishment plot to depose Labour's Harold Wilson.

In some quarters, there were even rumblings of a military coup.

A couple of years ago, when the un reconstructed Bennite Jeremy Corbyn became leader, Mullen talked about writing a sequel. He imagined the Funny  People orchestrating a putsch to thwart a democratically elected Corbyn government.

Trouble is, history has a habit of not working out as you expect. Although, as Marx said, history does have the capacity to repeat itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. That's where we are right now. Except tragedy and farce are running in tandem.

WE are in the middle of

A VERY BRITISH COUP

but not as Mullin predicted. What we're seeing is an elaborate, well-financed and coordinated plot to overturn as extreme Left-wing Prime Minister

BUT

the democratically expressed will of the British people.

It's being mounted by the Government of the day, aided and abetted by Big Business and the Civil Service.

[A repeat of 1970's-again by a supposed Conservative Government.]

 

THIS is A  Very BRITISH Coup, only written by Lewis Carroll not Chris Mullin. In our new Looking Glass World, words mean-as Humpty Dumpty declared-whatever they want them to mean.

Thus the dwindling band of MPs sticking uo for the

17.4 MILLION who voted

LEAVE

are condemned as plotters and rebels

Those, including Theresa May, who are doing everything in their power to

PREVENT

BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU

and becoming once again a

PROUD SOVEREIGN NATION

are hailed absurdedly as true patriots

As I've said often enough, just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

About the only thing upon which I've ever agreed with Ken Livingstone - apart from cheap Tube fares - was when he wrote a book called

If Voting Changed Anything They'd Abolish it. The Establishment seems hell-bent on proving him

Right over Brexit .

[The EDP has over decades seen much evidence of this very fact and though continually bringing evidence to the surface nobody appears to be interested whether it is lack of Bobbies -on-the beat - Health Service in crisis-Pot-holes-closed Police Stations...Britons on worst State Pensions in the Europe-even Portugal is marginally more. And a bloated -wasteful and grotesque so-called FOREIGN AID which even some regimes as recipients have requested to be stopped .

I told  you the day after the referendum that the fix was already in . Now they're on the final furlongs

We're being informed, in no uncertain fashion that

OUR VOTES ARE WORTHLESS

that they don't count.

WE'RE TOO IGNORANT, TOO UNEDUCATED, TOO RACIST

To be taken seriously.

Politicians who try to square the circle are vilified.

One minute Dominic Raab, who attempted to make a go of being Brexit Secretary, is a principled pragmatic operator of the highest praise.

The next, when he is forced to resign because Mother Theresa has deliberately undermined his position and then lied about it, he's dismissed as a disloyal traitor. And If I hear anyone else demanding a second

'People's Vote'

I'll scream.

All they want to do is reverse the referendum result or give us three options so they can split the

LEAVE VOTE

To be honest, I can't take much more of this patronising guff. The Beeb's idea of discerning commentators these days seems to extend no further than 'Baroness' Shameless Chuckabutty, Potty Toynbee and Mad Alastair Campbell, the author of the dodgy dossier which took into an

ILLEGAL WAR IN IRAQ.

 

As I believe I may have observed before. Campbell is the only bloke I know with a certificate to prove he's sane.

And don't get me started on the CBI which throughout my career has been wrong about everything from joining the euro to the Thatcher reforms. The CBI speaks only for monopolistic, multinational megacorps, not the small-to-medium businesses which are the backbone of our economy and always get the rough end  of the pineapple from Brussels - even though they don't sell so much as a brass washer outside British borders.

Twenty-five-odd years ago, covering a CBI conference in Glasgow, I watched the chairman of Dunlop taking the stage wearing a kilt and waving a Union Jack, as part of an I'm Backing Britain campaign. The following week he sold the company to the Japanese.

These are the same people bnow claiming to have British interests at the heart of their determination to

KEEP US SHACKLED TO THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC EU

The final straw came when the arrogant Amber Rudd was restored to Government over the weekend and immediately demanded loyalty and unity around Mrs May's 'deal'.  Her commitment to 'loyalty' hasn't stopped her trashing Cabinet colleagues in the past.

This fanatically pro-EU women who oozes an inter-galactic sense of  entitledment from every pore, is the sister of the PR spiv Roland Rudd, who is paid a small fortune to run

PROJECT FEAR

on behalf of his well-healed clients.

Just imagine if one of Boris's siblings was cashing in on

BREXIT.

The calls from Remainers for the police to investigate would be deafening. By Sunday, I'd had enough and reached the point where I came over all Tom Robinson.

I've given up reading the papers,

I've given up watching TV.

 

LOOK, I repeat, for those of you who missed it the first time round, even tungsten-tipped hard Brexiteers like me accept there will have to be some concessions if we're going to escape from the EU straitjacket.

And I do think the prospect of a Marxist Corbynista government is too horrible to contemplate.

But I also believe its 1992 all over again. This is Mother Theresa's

BLACK WEDNESDAY

MOMENT

WHATEVER HAPPENS NEXT

THE TORIES

ARE SHOT TO PIECES.

All trust and confidence in them has drained away and we're looking at a Labour government by default whenever the next election is called

Most of the 17.4 million who believe they have been betrayed will simply stay at home, or drift back to Labour. Democracy will be the ultimate casualty of this shabby debacle.

The pathetic defeatest dog's breakfast of an agreement

 which Mother Theresa is trying to force down our throats isn't worthy of the description 'deal'.

It is a monstrous capitulation and will be etched on her political gravestone, even if she does manage to get it, or a version thereof, through Parliament.

Where do we go from here?

I haven't a clue.

But at least we now know exactly

what a

Very British Coup

LOOKS LIKE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 20,2018

H.F.1747

 

 

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

[A LESSON OF HISTORY]]

 

     

    Throughout its benighted history,

     

    megalomaniacs have tried and failed

     

    to

     

    subjugate Europe's sovereign nations.

     

     

    Here, with Brussels making the same

     

    mistake,

     

    says SIMON JENKINS asks will they ever learn

     

     

    from...

     

     

    2,000 YEARS OF HUBRIS AND FOLLY

SATURDAY

ESSAY

BY

SIMON JENKINS: Dictators failed to unite Europe's ... - Daily Mail

OCTOBER 20, 2018

 

ON AUGUST 6, 1806, a herald in full regalia rode across Vienna to the city's Jesuit church. He climbed the tower blew his silver trumpet and summoned the crowd to silence. he then announced that the Holy Roman Empire was dead.

After a thousand years of existence, Europe's oldest union was being wound up-courtesy of Napoleon. The crowd wept.

Might it happen again? History tells us that whenever Europe tries to act in unison, it screws up. The Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne left an empire that collapsed in ruins. Ferdinand of Bohemia tried to create a single Roman Catholic empire, and unleashed the Thirty Years War in the 17th century. Napoleon brought most of Europe under his rod, an millions died until Wellington did for him at Waterloo.

 The Allies punished Germany after the First World War, and so brought Hitler to power. Today's European Union mishandled Russia after 1989 and paved  the way for the reign of Vladimir Putin.

Anyone who believes the EU is so modern, united and peace-loving that it will deftly handle Britain's departure should read history and shudder.

 Ever since somewhere called Europe came into being under the Ancient Greeks, two forces have driven this continent forward.

One is the  inability of the descendents of its original migrant tribes to live in peace with their neighbours. The other is the attempt of one power

 [GERMANY TODAY]

after another to seek to dominate and unite those disparate tribes.

 

Rome  tried. So did successive popes, Holy Roman emperors, Louis XIV, Napoleon, Hitler and now, dare I add, the leaders of the European Union. Some of these attempts were well-intentioned; most were not so'

There is no question they together forged a continent that is globally outstanding.

Today, Europe is wealthy, stable, mostly liberal and a magnet to the world's migrants, rich and poor alike. Whether this was  because of or in spite of a history of ceaseless conflict is an open question, But so, too, is whether half a century of stability can survive any new breakdown in unity.

WHEN I first studied Europe's history, I searched for themes that have glued together its various forces. First was the potency of ancient Mediterranean culture. Greece under Pericles was a kingdom of reason, fascinated by the human condition as expressed in art, literature and civic politics.

Rome was a sort of opposite, a realm of law and order, the wielding of power over the entire Mediterranean basin. 'These be your arts, O Rome, 'said Virgil, to impose the ways of peace,' The operative word was impose.

As Roman rule disintegrated, it mutated into that of the Christian Church.

Christianity was ostensibly a doctrine of universal love and peace, but it soon became a cauldron of rivalry and disunity. It split Rome from Constantinople, and proved so quarrelsome that a third of Christendom-in the Levant and Africa-became Muslim and has remained so ever since.

 In 1216, the bid of Pope Innocent III to declare himself sovereign lord of Europe bred endless conflict with the Holy Roman Empire, based in Germany. So we can conclude that as a glue of union, religion was a failure. By the 16th century the Reformation had split Innocent's Roman church in two, between Protestant north and Catholic south.

This in turn led to the Thirty Years War-the cruellest devastation of Europe before the 20th century. From the wreckage of that first great European War ever more potent nation states -notably France, Spain and Austria.

The new cause of disruption was not religion but dynasty. Louis XIV sought perpetual war with his neighbours. Russia flexed its territorial muscles. Frederick the Great of Prussia declared that 'national enlargement is a fundamental law of life'. To him, Europe was synonymous with struggle.

Nothing seemed able to bring peace to the continent: not the vitality of the Renaissance or wisdom of the Enlightenment, not great thinkers and writers like Petrarch, Shakespeare. Locke, Voltaire or Goethe.

Napoleon's attempt to unite Europe under French rule led to

5,000,000 DEATHS

The victorious nations at the Congress of Vienna in 1815, a few months after Waterloo valiantly attempted a

'Concert of Europe'.

In future, they ordained, difference would be settled around a conference table not the battlefield.

Peace lasted for a century, while Europe plunged into a different form of aggrandisement-that of overseas imperialism

By the end of the 19th century, the British, French, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish and Germans ruled an astonishing half the world's population and 85 per cent of its trade

Some might have hoped that such expansion might leave Europe itself in peace. Yet no sooner had it strutted the globe as a champion of progress then it fell victim to two of the world's most horrendous conflagrations.

The idea that the 'Kaiser's war' and then 'Hitler's war were random Prussian monstrosities was absurd. They resulted from a failure of political imagination and leadership across all of Europe, whose turbulent nations seemed incurably belligerent.

 By 1945, Europe was in self-inflicted ruins. Its peoples were starving, its cities destroyed and a centuries-old edifice of cultural achievement was crippled. Though Fascism had been defeated, the price was half a continent enslaved to Communism, and the other half dependent on American protection.

There is no doubt that the subsequent half-century saw  Europe at its best. It rebuilt itself, displaying a sincere desire for there never to be a war ever again

 A Common Market was formed in 1956 under the Treaty of Rome. This treaty grew and flourished, until a free trade area covered virtually all non-communist Europe. The continent seemed genuinely at peace, under the embrace of 'ever closer union'.

 But as this half of Europe prospered and cohered, it also slid into the morass of bureaucratic centralism. And here is where the lessons of history were ignored

 

The ambition of the Brussels  elite was curiously reminiscent of the medieval church. It became a quest for ever-tighter control of its adherents, and a disregard for the political mood of member states

The first moment of truth came with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. This ended the wartime division of Europe, to which the EU reacted like a conquering power. It enticed Russia's old Warsaw Pact allies into the EU and NATO, and left Moscow dangerously isolated.

When Boris Yeltsin warned that advancing NATO deep into Eastern  Europe meant 'the flames of war could break out again across Europe, the EU laughed.

The result was Vladimir Putin, vowing to 'make Russia great again' under  his kleptomaniac rule.  In the U.S., the balance of power between a central superstate and its various subordinate states was embedded in a constitution, written in blood. I Europe, that balance was left to evolve.

The EU ignored the risks it was running, not just in mishandling Russia, but in readily opening its borders to the immature democracies of Eastern Europe.

[And not forgetting the arrival in Germany of the once East German official Frau Merkel.]

After Maastricht in 1992, which effectively pledged the continent to become one giant federal entity, majority voting in the EU council eroded the authority of NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS.

Europe seemed the plaything of French bureaucrats and German bankers.

[HITLER WOULD BE PROUD]

 

 

Once more, the hard-learned lessons of the past were disregarded in the zealous pursuit of a new Nirvana. For example, the continent's longest confederation was the Holy Roman Empire. Voltaire may have called it not holy, nor Roman nor an empire-but its respect for the treasured autonomy of dozens of German princelings contrived to keep the German people's at peace with their neighbours for a millennium. Europe gained in the process, the wealth of the Rhine and the Baltic, the radicalism of Luther and the genius of Bach and Beethoven. That union collapsed only when Napoleon in France and then Bismarck in Germany could not tolerate what they saw as affront to their imperial ambitions.

The collapse of a united Europe did neither tyrant any good, but it did turn Germany from a peaceful confederacy - a kind of giant Switzerland - into a belligerent power under the supremacy of warlike Prussia.

The lessons must be obvious. Attempts at European union fail when they lose respect for the

IDENTITY

AND

AUTONOMY

of the continent's ancestral communities

You cannot ram union, let alone

GLOBALISATION

down people's throats. Diversity lies at the core of Europe's collective experience, but it is jealously guarded diversity.

Europe can never be subsumed under a single power structure. Union can only be a light-touch and consensual.

The EU's greatest mistake was to move beyond ever-closer trade to an ill-defined' ever closer union'. Above all, it lay in demanding that member states accept open borders.

That may have seemed a small matter to the globe-trotting cosmopolites of Brussels. But control over immigration meant control over the

CHARACTER and RATE of CHANGE of LOCAL COMMUNITIES.

To the member states of Europe this was a critical area-of sovereignty

[sacrosanct]

The character of one's society is not to be bartered merely for tariff-free trade.

Unlike previous unions in Europe, the EU is a collection of self -determining democracies.

Already by 2010, anti-European sentiment was growing and consent crumbling. Turnouts in EU elections plummeted from

60 % to 40 per cent.

Populist politicians-anti immigration and often anti EU-emerged in the UK. France, Italy, Germany and former communist states. The 2008 financial crisis saw the Eurozone's GERMAN MASTERS  inflict terrible damage on GREECE and SPAIN.

Then in 2016, the UK shattered the equilibrium. Its people voted -narrowly- to withdraw. Europe's union face d a fissure, and a deep one.

There was nothing new in Britain detaching itself from the rest of Europe. It had 'left' after the Hundred Years War that finally ended in the mid-15th century and after Henry V111's defection from Rome nearly a century later. It refused to join the Common Market in 1957, and only combined under NATO to benefit from America's nuclear shield.

Now, once again, Britain has said

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

We should have no doubt of the reason. Political Europe has not found an answer to the question that defied all earlier attempts at union. How can this fragmentary continent be united without lurching either towards debilitating central authority or towards disintegration

Since the Lisbon Treaty of 2009, the EU has lurched towards the former. Now, with the rise of a reactionary populism, it is lurching towards the latter

There is hardly a member state that would dare imitate Britain and hold a Referendum on EU membership. But that is insufficient consent for union.

With or without Britain the EU must find a way of returning substantive sovereignty to its 

MEMBER STATES

not least over their borders. If it does that, who knows, Britain might rejoin.

If it fails, Britain will not be the only defector. The EU will go the way of its many forerunners - to

DISINTEGRATION and DANGER.

*  *  *

 

SIMON JENKINS: Dictators failed to unite Europe's ... - Daily Mail

OCTOBER 20,2018

 

A SHORT History of Europe:

From Pericles to Putin by Simon Jenkins. Viking, £25 (20pc discount), visit www.mailshop.co.uk/books or call 0844 571 0640, p&p is free on orders over £15. Spend £30 on books and get FREE premium delivery. Offer valid to 27/11/2018

shop

H.F.1733

*  *  *

LITTLEJOHN

 

The Living Dead

AND

The Joy of Brexit

DAILY MAIL- RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: The Joy of

Brexit

 

NOVEMBER 13,2018

 

JUST when you thought the Brexit debacle couldn't get any worse, the crypt door creaks open and out crawls Gordon Brown to give us the benefit of his wisdom.

Looking like an extra from a George Romero zombie movie, Gordon Brown became the latest member of the Living Dead to demand a second referendum.

His two immediate predecessors, Tony Blair and Johnny Major are already doing their damnest to overturn the clearly expressed will of

17.4 MILLION PEOPLE

who voted unequivocally

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION.

I think we can safely ignore Gordon's view on

DEMOCRACY.

After losing the 2010 General Election, managing to harvest 29 per cent of votes cast, he tried to hang on by what remained of his fingernails and had to be dragged out of Downing Street four days later.

HE WAS THE MAN WHO SIGNED THE LISBON TREATY IN SECRET,

sneaking in through the tradesmen's entrance to avoid photographers.

You may vaguely recall that Blair and Brown gave a solemn promise to hold a referendum on Lisbon and then cynically reneged on it. Major forced the Maastricht Treaty through the Commons, in the teeth of fierce opposition, and consigned the Conservative Party to

13 years in the wilderness.

Gordon's solution to heal the divisions which could only be exacerbated still further would be to establish a new Royal Commission to 'engage and listen' to voters views.

Brilliant.

That's exactly what millions of us had in mind when we voted in 2016.

What Do We Want?

Royal Commission!

When Do We Want It?

Now!

Anyway, what's wrong with simple accepting the outcome of the biggest single democratic exercise in

BRITISH HISTORY.

The only reason we have bitter divisions in some sections of society is that

well-funded fanatical Remainers refuse to acknowledge the result of the first

'PEOPLE'S VOTE'

and are determined

TO REVERSE IT.

Sadly this poisonous cohort contains three of our four former PM's.

To Call Me Dave's credit, he has maintained a dignified distance from the self-styled resistance to Brexit.

But what is it about certain ex-prime ministers that persuades them they immediately become sagacious statesman the moment they leave office, regardless of the mess they left behind?

Why do they think they can completely disregard the wishes of those who once voted for them and kept them in the manner to which they always  felt entitled?

Of course, all Prime Ministers eventually go mad. It just takes some a little longer than others.

IN the case of Theresa May, who is still there (for now), she has already managed to convince herself that she is the only person with the wit, imagination and ability to decide what comprises a successful

BREXIT

The sad fact is that she possesses precisely none of those qualities. As a direct result of her fatal combination of stubborness and stupidity, she has achieved the feat of joining the ranks of the

LIVING DEAD

while still in the job.

[The crisis on our streets has been brought about by Theresa May when Home Secretary when she upset the POLICE FEDERATION and she undoubtedly holds a grudge because it is lack of FINANCE that has seen the virtual disappearance of the Bobbie-on-the Beat and closure of POLICE STATIONS and the 'Wild West' anarchy on our streets.]

 

On the other hand, I suppose it takes a special kind of genius to alienate

EVERYBODY

-Leaver. Remainers, the EU Commission, the DUP-YOU NAME IT.

 

When you manage to upset both sides of the Johnson family, you're in big trouble. As I wrote back at the time of Chequers sell-out in July, she's hopelessly bungled the negotiations and is prepared to reduce Britain to

serf status

in her desperation to

SEAL A DEAL:

'Independent sovereign nations do not accept the jurisdiction of unelected foreign judges. Independent sovereign nations do not swallow wholesale rules made by unaccountable foreign bureaucrats. Independent sovereign nations are at liberty to conclude free trade deals with any country in the world.'

 

And for this she wants to bung Brussels

£39BILLION

OF OUR MONEY

Since Chequers, it's got even worse. No wonder even Remainers like Jo Johnson despair.

About the only sensible thing Gordon Brown said yesterday was that we can still go back to the EU and tell them the deal on the table won't wash - despite the fact that Brussels hasn't even agreed to that.

They think Mother Theresa is so feeble that they have been emboldened to demand continued access to Britain's fishing waters. That would be the ultimate humiliation among many. Grocer Heath gave up our traditional fishing waters to get us in to the EU. Now Mrs May could give them away again so we can 'LEAVE'.

 

YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP.

But Gordon's right. We can go back and renegotiate. Just not with the dismal, defeatist Theresa in charge

She should have the decency to resign in July, when it was clear the game was up

The only way forward is for her to fall off her kittren heels, sooner than later. After two wasted years of dissembling, betrayal, incompetance and downright surrender to Brussels, Mother Theresa deserves nothing less than an ignominious departure.

If the Conservative Party can rediscover some backbone and sense of self-preservation they can get rid of her tomorrow without having to trigger a protracted leadership contest, provided they agree on a single compromise candidate.

Who would replace her? Does it really matter? Years ago, when there was talk of a stalking horse candidate standing against Johnny Major, I reakoned a real horse could beat him.

So I invited readers to vote for either Major or Red Rum as Prime Minister. Red Rum romped home by a margin of

9-1

The talk in some quarters is that Home Secretary Sajid Javid might be the right fit. He is bright, has a compelling backstory and although he sided with Remain during the referendum, is not a committed EU federalist.

On the downside, when it comes to inspirational public speaking, he has all the charisma of Albert RN,

But beggars can't be choosers. And we can't go on as we are

Even diehard 'no deal'  Brexiteers like me have to accept, as Mick Jagger said, that you can't always get what you want.

The best we can probably hope for at this late stage is a

Norway For Now Deal;

which would get us out of the EU with no barriers to frictionless trade. It wouldn't be ideal but we could try to pick the bones out of it later.

 

Unless the Tories can pull a relatively cheap Brexit out of the fire, they will forfeit all trust and credibility and we will be staring down the barrel of a Corbyn government by default.

 

 

In a just universe, Labour shouldn't benefit from the Tory disarray. They're all over the place, too, and will vote down any deal put before Parliament because they want to force a General Election.

 

The Conservatives may be  what Terry-Thomas would have called a 'absolute shower', but do really want to live in a country with Corbyn in No 10, Mr McDonnell running the Treasury and Diane Abbott in charge of immigration and the Old Bill?

As FOR the Liberals, at least they managed to provide us with a little light relief.

Not only has 82-year old Lord Lester been suspended from the House for offering to make a women a baroness if she agreed to become his mistress - an allegation that he says is 'completely untrue'.

We also learn that 'one of their senior advisers has fallen foul of the #MeToo madness.

Apparently, he propositioned a female colleague after inviting her to dinner to discuss his party's 'Brexit position'.

Ding, dong!

I've heard of the missionary position but the Brexit position is a new one on me.

In case you're wondering exactly what her idea of the Brexit position, its like this:

Shackled together, facing both ways at once, with little prospect of an early withdrawal.

*  *  *

 

NOVEMBER 13,2018

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS-CHANGES OF FORM- ARE OURS]

 

 

STATEMENT

[Mr Richard Littlejohn has drawn an impressive  and positive picture of the present political scene which will be looked on as one of the most important epochs in the history of our island home.

 How a once FREE DEMOCRACY was SOLD out to a FOREIGN POWER and hindered in its RETRIEVAL by its ELECTED CHAMBER shows how the PEOPLE failed to heed the message of HISTORY that unless VIGILANCE is KEPT then THEIR FREEDOM is at RISK..

Over the past DECADES many PATRIOTS have WARNED of the CONSEQUENCES of the NEGLECT of our WORLD-PRIZED ANCIENT PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY an INHERITANCE in TRUST for FUTURE GENERATIONS.. THE FUTURE IS UNCERTAIN because TRAITORS within our ELECTED CHAMBER are in the ENEMIES CAMP of TWO BLOODY WORLD WARS  GERMANY because the EU was the BRAINCHILD of ADOLF HITLER.

 WHEN we are AGAIN a FREE NATION STATE our CONSTITUTION should be AMENDED to PREVENT ever AGAIN our NATION STATE of ENGLAND being a SUBJECT STATE of another POWER by the EMBEDEDMENT of OUR FREEDOM in the CONSTITUTION OF OUR COUNTRY. THe LAW of TREASON should be updated to ensure that any future individuals are punished ,who plot to undermine the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

of

ENGLISHMEN. "]

the very foundation of many constitutions the world over.

'...The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their own rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no  shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.  It may be very wrong to say that the forms of Government are of no importance and that the best system is the one best administered.  But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of FREE INSTITUTIONS is their enabling men to obtain a wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those who live under it to WATCH the CONDUCT of their RULERS, aiding them when RIGHT, checking them when they are WRONG; and above all, that no Constitution however excellent, can supersede the NECESSITY or DISPENCE with the DUTY of this CONSTANT VIGILANCE.' [Caps are Ours]

 by HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM FRS-LONDON-1844

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 13-2018

 

 

H.F.1759

*  *  *

 BROKEN PROMISES

The decision of the DAILY MAIL to no longer support

BREXIT

is analogous to a newspaper that supported

THE END OF SLAVERY

(and what are we in reality but slaves withi HITLER'S

so-called

 EUROPEAN UNION)

to no longer do so because their was a

CHANGE OF EDITOR

was not in keeping with ONE of THE watchfull responsibilities of

the

FOURTH ESTATE

of our

CONSTITUTION.

THE ISSUE IN BOTH INSTANCES IS ABOUT

FREEDOM

OF

PERSON and COUNTRY

 

What could be more important in the lives of a people with

MAGNA CARTA

PETITION OF RIGHT

HABEAS CORPU

TRIAL BY JURY...

IN ITS LONG ISLAND HISTORY IN THEIR ONCE

FREE INDEPENDENT  NATION STATE

OF

 
 ENGLAND

 IN OUR ISLAND HOME?

THANKFULLY , AT LEAST THE DAILY MAIL IS PERMITTING A SMALL BAND OF PATRIOTS TO CARRY ON THEIR ONCE CAMPAIGN  SUCH AS RICHARD LITTLEJOHN and others  who are UPHOLDING alone

OTHERS HAVE BROKEN

THE TRADITION OF A FREE PRESS AND AN IMPLIED PROMISE.

 

DECEMBER  8,2018

hH.F.1770

*  *  *

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

I'm a

Brexiteer

Get me

OUT

of here!

 

*....MY BEST guess on Brexit has always been that a dirty deal was done before the Chequers ambush in the summer

Mother Theresa would present her shabby withdrawal agreement, certain in the knowledge that it would never get the support of her own party, let alone the House of Commons.

But in the process, she would shed the most truculent Brexiteers from her Government and eventually, pull a rabbit from the hat at the last minute which would allow her to plot a marshmallow soft Brexit-in-name-only through Parliament.

I assumed the EU's grand panjandrums were fully on board with this cynical stitch-up, whatever noises they made for public consumption

. If there's one thingJean- Paul-Georges-et Ringo would love more than the UK crawling back into the fold, tail between legs. It's, Mrs May's craven plan to keep us in their orbit as a serf state, under the thumb but shorn mof all influence.

Up until yesterday, anyway, everything was going according to plan. That was before she bottled putting her 'deal' to the vote, when the overwhelming scale of her looming defeat became apparent.

No prime Minister could have survived in office given the hammering she would have taken in the division lobbies. So, instead of scuttling off to Brussels begging for more pre-arranged concessions' after a slim mdefeat in Parliament, she has been forced to step back from the abyss.

Now what?

Theresa says she intends to return to the EU to seek further 'reassurance' on the Irish backstop. Be honest, have you any idea what this 'backstop' nonsense is all about?  It's an elaborate smoke-screen dreamed up to stop a proper Brexit.

LONG story short, without going into teeth-grindingly boring detail, it is designed to divide Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK and ensure that we can never, ever,leave the EU's cuastoms union, without the permission of our

SO-CALLED 'PARTNERS.

That pipsqueak ingrate Irish premier Lenny Verruca didn't do Mrs May any favours yesterday, either, dancing a jig to the Brussels tune and issuing empty threats against a benevolent, and much larger, neighbour which kept his country afloat during difficult economic times.

Of all the horror stories put about by

PROJECT FEAR

the warnings about Brexit imperilling the Irish peace process are by far and away the

MOST DESPICABLE.

It is an insult not just to Britain but to the Irish people themselves, on whichever side of the political divide, who have invested so much in resolving their differences.

For opportunist politicians to exploit

GOODWILL

with incendiary remarks about reigniting violence is beneath contempt.

So, too, the garbage about children going hungry because school meals won't be available after Brexit, or people dying from lack of imported medicines. Enough, already.

Look, I say again, even hardline 'no deal' Brexiteers like me accept that there will have to be some compromises if we are to

GET OUT OF THE EU

in one piece.

But the antics of the political class have been shameful, an insult to the intelligence of every single one of us who pay their wages.

As I said last week,

WHO CAN YOU TRUST ?

With a few honourable exceptions, their collective behaviour as been

SELF-SERVING and DISGRACEFUL.

I admired Boris for having the courage to come out in favour of

LEAVE

even if he did take for ever to weigh his options.

He should have got the top job after the referendum, but was carved up by his oppo Michael Gove, who clearly still fancies his own chances of becoming Prime Minister. Don't they all?

But when Boris turned up on TV at the weekend with a smart new haircut, my heart sank.

This is no longer about

BREXIT

It's about

HIM.

THEN I read that Boris is apparently part of a Tory leadership dream ticket with Amber Rudd. I'm sorry, I'll just read that again. This is the same Look back in Amber who not so long ago was slagging off Boris, accusing him of not being safe in taxis.

Now were asked to believe they're Westminster's lovey-dovey answer to Seann and Katya whoever they are). I'm only surprised that Amber hasn't had a Mrs Thatcher perm-that's if Esther Mc Rantzen, or whatever her name is, hasn't beaten her to it.

And so this is Christmas, and what have they done? Apart from squabbling among themselves-

NOTHING.

My best guess is still that a grubby deal has been done and may yet be revived.

But after yesterday, I wouldn't bank on anything any more.

The political class must think that we're so stupid and bored with the whole business that we'll accept any deal they can cobble together.

And, you know what , sadly maybe they're right.

I'm a Brexiteer. Get me

OUT

 of here!

*  *  *

[The present political system is bankrupt. Only PR can save our nation from eventual Despotism. AS we have stated over the past decades Members of Parliament should ONLY serve one TERM in office which should ensure that MPs will in the main do the best they can for THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS and THEIR COUNTRY.  It will ensure that those from all  walks of life have the opportunity to SERVE THEIR PEOPLE and THEIR COUNTRY. Not as now when the greater majority have decided ONLY TO

SERVE THEMSELVES.]

*

*...HOWEVER brexit works out, or doesn't

, there seems to be no end to mass immigration. The number of EU citizens settling in Britain may have fallen since the referendum, but arrivals from the rest of the world have hit a 14 year high.

A quarter of a million more people came here from outside the EU than left in the past year, an increase of 40 per cent. It was another triumph for Mother Theresa,who-don't forget-was in charge of

IMMIGRATION

at the

HOME OFFICE

until the the keys to Number 10 dropped into her lap...

 

*  *  *

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: I'm a Brexiteer get me out of here! | Daily Mail...

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

DECEMBER 11,2018

H.F.1763

*  *  *

Why I, an avowed Remainer

 believe a second referendum would poison politics for a generation.

by Dominic Sandbrook

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

'This is a huge decision for our country, perhaps the biggest we will make in our lifetimes. and it will be the final decision...when the british people speak their voice will be respected-not ignored [as in december 2018]. if we vote to leave, then we

WILL LEAVE

there will not be another renegotiation and another referendum.'

David Cameron.

The date  was November 10,2015

and those were the words of David Cameron, setting out his plans for the EU referendum he had promised in his election manifesto a few months earlier. You can hardly say he wasn't clear.

During the campaign that followed, both sides stuck to the same script. This was a moment of decision, a one-off showdown that would never be repeated. As the official leaflets sent to every home put it,

'the Government will implement what you decide.'

Haughty...

Three years on, however, those promises are beginning to look increasingly fragile. In a recent months a hysterical campaign for a so-called 'Peoples Vote' has ben gathering strength, with heavy promotion from the

BBC

THE GUARDIAN

and much of the pseudo-intellectual liberal elite.

Until recently it was easy to write them off as a coalition of sore losers, united only by their obsession with the EU and their haughty disregard for the

17.4 MILLION

who had the impudence

to vote

LEAVE.

 But now it seems, their campaign is closer to fruition than ever.

Thanks to the deadlock in Parliament, where Theresa May's hard-won deal with the EU

[We hardly think so as this was no doubt already in place possibly even well over a year ago.]

seems hopelessly becalmed, a new referendum is becoming a much stronger possibility.

Even some of Mrs May's Cabinet have apparently come round to the idea. The Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd, for example, pointedly said on Sunday that a second referendum should 'not be off  the table', which flatly contradicts the Prime Minister's line over the past years.

Yet in purely logistical terms, a second referendum would be a

NIGHTMARE.

There is perilously little time to get legislation through before Britain leaves the EU on March 29,2019.

And what would be the question? Mrs May's deal or no deal?Mrs May's deal or Remain? Or some combination of all three, with two rounds of voting.

As political scientists have shown, the outcome could depend entirely on the method chosen. For example, if Leave votes were split between two different Brexit options, then Remain could waltz through the middle without winning a majority, which would be manifestly wrong.

More importantly, though, a second referendum would be morally wrong -and I say that as someone who voted Remain. Campaigners for a 'People's vote' (who voted in the last one-aliens?) pretend that it represents the democratic way forward. But this strikes me as

NONSENSE

If two referendums are more democratic than one, why stop with two? Why not three, four or five? Why not have a referendum every week?

I know plenty of fervent People's Vote enthusiasts. Every one voted Remain. Far  from being fans of referendums in general, they were appalled by David Cameron's decision to let the common people decide their future.

When they talk piously about wanting the 'final say on the deal' or wanting 'more democracy',

THEY ARE BEING DISHONEST.

They  do not want more democracy; they want less of it.

And if they get their way and britain stayed in the e u, you can be sure they would never support another referendum.

Given that I supported Remain, some readers may wonder why I don't agree with

THEM

 The answer is that I am a democrat.

The nature of democracy means that you don't confuse your own personal prejudices with divine wisdom, and try to accept defeat with good grace.

Unfortunately, the likes of Tony Blair, Nick Clegg, and Alastair Campbell don't see things that way. United in hysterical outrage, they are the spoiled brats of the political world, who simply cannot cope with losing.

For the past two years, Mr Blair and Mr Clegg, in particular, have rarely been far from Brussels, pouring poison into the ears of the EU elite, urging them not to make concessions to Britain, and promising that they would get a second referendum eventually.

I hesitate to use the word 'treachery' but there comes a point when no other word will do. A genuine patriot would put his personal convictions to one side and work in the interests of the democratic majority. But when it comes to the crunch, does anyone really believe Mr Blair and Mr Clegg would side with Britain?

The People's Vote website claims that 'new facts have come to light about the complexity of Brexit that no one could have known at the time of the referendum'.

THIS IS A LIE, PURE AND SIMPLE.

There are no new facts. The Remain campaign made precisely the same argument in 2016, and millions chose to dismiss it. Why insult them by forcing them to vote again?

AS for the argument a second plebiscite would heal divisions of the past two years,this is dangerous nonsense

SMUG...

A second referendum campaign would almost certainly be even more angry and impassioned than the first. As Mrs May has poined out, the air would be thick with accusations of

BETRAYAL

17.4MILLION

people feeling that their democratically expressed instruction

HAD BEEN IGNORED.

Imagine the reaction in towns and cities far from Westminster. Imagine how people would feel in Stoke on Trent, where69 per cent voted

LEAVE

; or Hull, where 68 per cent voted

LEAVE

The second reforendum advocates, smug in their university-town bubbles, never bother to imagine what these people think. They don'tlive in these towns, and if they think about their inhabitants at all, it is to sneer at them as knuckle-dragging racists.

But her is how it would look from Wakefield. It would look as though a spoiled political and intellectual elite, cut off by its own privilege from the views of ordinary people, had conspired to betray democracy and

STEAL

THE BREXIT VOTE.

And you can be sure of one thing, the millions of Tory supporters who voted

LEAVE

would abandon the party in droves.

It could be out of power for many years to come the next time a general election came round.

 [In many towns and cities of the SHIRES many Brexit Labour voters will surely look for other new patriotic political parties to support.]

Who would benefit from a 'People's Vote'? Jeremy Corbyn might, depending on his position during the campaign. (So far he seems to have been reluctant to offer any cogent opinion at all, either because he wants to disguise his true position on Brexit for narrow partisan gain, or because he is simply not bright enough to grasp the issues at hand. )

POISONOUS...

Ukip certainly would. So would even more poisonous groups and characters on the far-right, such as the English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson, who was much to the fore in a 'Brexit Betrayal' march last week.

Is that really what the ultra remainers want? Are they so indifferent to the health of our political; commonwealth? Do they really think their own prejudices are worth more that the

PRINCIPLE OF DEMOCRACY.

If our politicians want a way through this impasse, there is an

obvious answer. The EU should make concessions on the much-discussed Irish back-stop, and then our MPs should get behind Mrs May's hard-won deal-a compromise which, although not perfect, is the best chance of honouring the

BREXIT VOTE

without destroying our economy. By contrast, a second referendum would be a victory for hysteria over pragmatism. It would poison our politics for a generation, driving a wedge between ordinary voters and the entitled elite.

And, if you doubt it, just ask yourself one question. If after all the promises, there is a second referendum, why would anybody ever trust politicians again?

*  *  *

[It should be remembered that the EU tactic on referendums was to not accept a NO vote but as the facts of the build up of that  Enemy of Democracy divulge  it continued to pressure once free nation states to campaign until the yes vote was obtained. This tells you all you need to know of the undemocratic nature of that cunning and conniving beast in Brussels.  Those who consider themselves Remainers must surely have understood the nature of the political background of the so-called European Union with its established birth in the minds of the Nazi leaders during World War II.

Mrs May who has a history of association with the German Chancellor Frau Merkel has taken years to come up with HER EU's plan which to true Brexit voters is a SELL-OUT!, As we have stated many times only a HARD determined approach can secure a satisfactory DEAL or a  even a NO DEAL as present events appear to show. For a nation with a world renowned unique Democratic history to  find itself treated with distain by the captive members of the so-called EU some of whom owed their discarded national freedom to British diplomacy and intervention, who are now subjected people many of whom are now becoming slowly aware of the Beast of Burden to which they are now no better than SLAVES.]

 

*  *  *

[COMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!}

FIND OUT

More!

AND

The Rotten Heart of Europe   by Bernard Connolly-PARTS 1 to 4

*

 

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

 

 

H.F.1766

 

*  *  *

 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

If we all push, 2019 will see final victory against the Khazarian mafia

Many signs indicate that 2019 will be a breakthrough year in the battle against the satan-worshiping Khazarian mafia.  Not only have mass arrests begun, but the mass-murdering part of the pharmacidical/medical establishment is finally being taken out as well.  Another obvious sign it is no longer business as usual comes from the fact that the U.S. military is being withdrawn from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.  And this time the U.S. government shutdown may actually result in formal bankruptcy procedures against the illegal corporate government that has occupied Washington, D.C. since 1871.

Let’s start with the U.S. military withdrawals, since they mark one of the biggest changes seen since the end of World War II when the perpetual war economy of the U.S. military-industrial complex began.  Pentagon sources say U.S. President Donald Trump’s Christmas Day visit to Iraq portends a pull-out from that country.  This follows withdrawal announcements from Afghanistan and Syria, as well as a ceasefire in Yemen.  We also note that almost all of the U.S. carrier groups are now at rest in their home ports.

Even more dramatically, the sources say, “Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan’s mission will be [to bring out in public view the] space force, bring troops home, release extraterrestrial and suppressed technology, close overseas bases, beat swords into plowshares and cut waste, while building a more lethal military.”  This means peace on earth and goodwill to all in a very real sense this holiday season.

The Pentagon sources also say the long U.S. government shutdown “makes it easy to arrest Deep-Staters embedded in the government.”  Furthermore, the first senior official to be publicly tried in “Nuremburg 2.0 will be ….
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Western civilization heading for a reboot over the holidays

Many signs and confirmations from highly placed sources indicate that a reboot of Western civilization is being planned for 2019.  The shutdown of the U.S. government over the holidays, for example, has nothing to do with building a wall, and everything to do with a financial reboot and upcoming military tribunals.

However, what is coming is about much more than just rounding up the criminals who hijacked and bankrupted the U.S. government—it is about fixing the problems besetting monotheism.

Since today is December 24th, Christmas Eve, it’s a good time to remind people of the historical truth behind this holiday.  The fact is that nobody knows when Jesus Christ was born, so the early Christian church hijacked the old solar New Year holiday and replaced the sun with Jesus.  Here’s the thing:  the sun sets at its most northern point on December 21st, the winter solstice.  For three days afterwards, it appears to set at the same place, and then on December 25th it starts setting further south, marking the birth of the solar New Year.  Thus, the Christian church needs to confess and tell people the truth about Christmas without in any way denying the wonderful teachings of Jesus Christ and Christianity.

The Jews, for their part, need to stop celebrating the xenophobic Hanukkah and realize that it is perfectly kosher to celebrate the solar New Year (unless they somehow think the Creator did not make the sun).  Anyway, Merry Christmas to the Christians and Muslims, and Merry Sunmas to everybody else.

These issues, together with discussions of updating the calendars to bring them back into line with the movements of the heavens on which they are based, are going to be part of a broad public discourse in the New Year.  That is because, at the highest levels of world power, a decision has been made to go ahead and rebuild the temple in Jerusalem and turn that city into an international free zone.  This is why 2019 is likely to be a year for the history books.

In preparation for these upcoming historical changes, U.S. troops are being withdrawn from various conflict zones in order to pave the way for world peace, CIA sources say.  Pentagon sources agree, adding that “U.S. President Donald Trump is pulling out of Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, and the Ukraine to terminate the Deep State and the Zionists, since the global currency reset requires peace and cessation of hostilities.”

European royal family sources concur that preparations are under way for a reboot of the global financial system.  The current U.S. dollar, Euro, and Japanese yen-based system is bankrupt and dysfunctional, these and other sources agree.  This is especially true of the United States, which has been bankrupt for quite some time now, the sources say.  That’s why this current U.S. government shutdown is going to lead to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Secret head of world finance, Cardinal Pell, fired and big changes coming

Last week Cardinal George Pell was found guilty of sexually abusing children by an Australian court and was subsequently fired by Pope Francis because he was “elderly.”
https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/12/12/cardinal-pell-top-advisor-pope-francis-found-guilty-historical-sexual-offenses

This is huge news in the secret world of finance, because Pell was the person in charge of financial matters at the Vatican and thus was a secret controller of most world government leaders, P2 Freemason and CIA sources say.  This is because when most world rulers take power, they get a visit from an official of the Vatican Bank who hands them a bank book with an astronomical number written in it (a billion dollars or more for big countries;  less for smaller countries).  They are then told, “Welcome to the world of the rich,” and are gently reminded that if they refuse to accept the money they will be “removed.”

This is the choice of silver or lead that has allowed the Vatican P2 Freemason Lodge, run by descendants of the Caesars, to secretly rule most world governments.  The 200 leaders who last week affirmed the fraudulent “carbon causes global warming” agreement are all slaves of this system, P2 Freemason and CIA sources agree.
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/12/14/18139402/cop24-climate-change-katowice-poland

Thus, the removal of the head of this secret control system will have huge repercussions for world finance and politics, depending on who is selected to replace him, and also depending on whether or not this secret system will be allowed to continue.

On that front, another huge news item (still not fully confirmed because it only comes from one royal family source) is that a new head of the Committee of 300, the secret government of the 13 ruling bloodline families, will take power next year.  This means Queen Elizabeth will be handing the committee reins to a younger person (hint:  not Charles and not William).

With this caveat in mind (i.e., only one source), here some excerpts from a statement by the soon-to-be-appointed new committee head:  “The 13 ruling bloodlines and I have had enough of this world and the minions charged with its curation.  All Sovereign Heads of State and all respective governments fired.  Ordo ab Chao.

The source also said, “Sir Alexander Younger at MI6 is already briefed, along with the Queen in London and the Emperor in Tokyo,” about this development.

The statement further read that, “The Habsburg dynasty and spin-offs—most criminally psychopathic—have …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Previous JCS Chairman

Ben:  Enjoy your weekly newsletters and I put more credence in you than any other source.  I’m curious about your comment in last newsletter, “as the previous JCS Chairman was Army.”  I believe you’ll find that Gen. Joseph Dunford was a United States Marine.  Means a lot to us former active duty Marines!  Have a great day.
I was referring to his predecessor Mike Dempsey, since Dunford is still JCS Chairman for now.
–BF

 

 
2018-12-31

 

H.F.1769

*  *  *

 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Western civilization heading for a reboot over the holidays

Many signs and confirmations from highly placed sources indicate that a reboot of Western civilization is being planned for 2019.  The shutdown of the U.S. government over the holidays, for example, has nothing to do with building a wall, and everything to do with a financial reboot and upcoming military tribunals.

However, what is coming is about much more than just rounding up the criminals who hijacked and bankrupted the U.S. government—it is about fixing the problems besetting monotheism.

Since today is December 24th, Christmas Eve, it’s a good time to remind people of the historical truth behind this holiday.  The fact is that nobody knows when Jesus Christ was born, so the early Christian church hijacked the old solar New Year holiday and replaced the sun with Jesus.  Here’s the thing:  the sun sets at its most northern point on December 21st, the winter solstice.  For three days afterwards, it appears to set at the same place, and then on December 25th it starts setting further south, marking the birth of the solar New Year.  Thus, the Christian church needs to confess and tell people the truth about Christmas without in any way denying the wonderful teachings of Jesus Christ and Christianity.

The Jews, for their part, need to stop celebrating the xenophobic Hanukkah and realize that it is perfectly kosher to celebrate the solar New Year (unless they somehow think the Creator did not make the sun).  Anyway, Merry Christmas to the Christians and Muslims, and Merry Sunmas to everybody else.

These issues, together with discussions of updating the calendars to bring them back into line with the movements of the heavens on which they are based, are going to be part of a broad public discourse in the New Year.  That is because, at the highest levels of world power, a decision has been made to go ahead and rebuild the temple in Jerusalem and turn that city into an international free zone.  This is why 2019 is likely to be a year for the history books.

In preparation for these upcoming historical changes, U.S. troops are being withdrawn from various conflict zones in order to pave the way for world peace, CIA sources say.  Pentagon sources agree, adding that “U.S. President Donald Trump is pulling out of Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, and the Ukraine to terminate the Deep State and the Zionists, since the global currency reset requires peace and cessation of hostilities.”

European royal family sources concur that preparations are under way for a reboot of the global financial system.  The current U.S. dollar, Euro, and Japanese yen-based system is bankrupt and dysfunctional, these and other sources agree.  This is especially true of the United States, which has been bankrupt for quite some time now, the sources say.  That’s why this current U.S. government shutdown is going to lead to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Secret head of world finance, Cardinal Pell, fired and big changes coming

Last week Cardinal George Pell was found guilty of sexually abusing children by an Australian court and was subsequently fired by Pope Francis because he was “elderly.”
https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/12/12/cardinal-pell-top-advisor-pope-francis-found-guilty-historical-sexual-offenses

This is huge news in the secret world of finance, because Pell was the person in charge of financial matters at the Vatican and thus was a secret controller of most world government leaders, P2 Freemason and CIA sources say.  This is because when most world rulers take power, they get a visit from an official of the Vatican Bank who hands them a bank book with an astronomical number written in it (a billion dollars or more for big countries;  less for smaller countries).  They are then told, “Welcome to the world of the rich,” and are gently reminded that if they refuse to accept the money they will be “removed.”

This is the choice of silver or lead that has allowed the Vatican P2 Freemason Lodge, run by descendants of the Caesars, to secretly rule most world governments.  The 200 leaders who last week affirmed the fraudulent “carbon causes global warming” agreement are all slaves of this system, P2 Freemason and CIA sources agree.
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/12/14/18139402/cop24-climate-change-katowice-poland

Thus, the removal of the head of this secret control system will have huge repercussions for world finance and politics, depending on who is selected to replace him, and also depending on whether or not this secret system will be allowed to continue.

On that front, another huge news item (still not fully confirmed because it only comes from one royal family source) is that a new head of the Committee of 300, the secret government of the 13 ruling bloodline families, will take power next year.  This means Queen Elizabeth will be handing the committee reins to a younger person (hint:  not Charles and not William).

With this caveat in mind (i.e., only one source), here some excerpts from a statement by the soon-to-be-appointed new committee head:  “The 13 ruling bloodlines and I have had enough of this world and the minions charged with its curation.  All Sovereign Heads of State and all respective governments fired.  Ordo ab Chao.

The source also said, “Sir Alexander Younger at MI6 is already briefed, along with the Queen in London and the Emperor in Tokyo,” about this development.

The statement further read that, “The Habsburg dynasty and spin-offs—most criminally psychopathic—have …
 

 remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Previous JCS Chairman

Ben:  Enjoy your weekly newsletters and I put more credence in you than any other source.  I’m curious about your comment in last newsletter, “as the previous JCS Chairman was Army.”  I believe you’ll find that Gen. Joseph Dunford was a United States Marine.  Means a lot to us former active duty Marines!  Have a great day.
I was referring to his predecessor Mike Dempsey, since Dunford is still JCS Chairman for now.
–BF

 

Secret war centers on SWIFT after George Bush Sr. is executed

Since the death of Nazi Fourth Reich Fuhrer George Bush Sr., the battle for control of the world’s financial system, and thus of the process of deciding humanity’s future, is now centering on control of the SWIFT international interbank electronic transfer system.

A final battle is taking place between the 13 bloodlines which have traditionally controlled the planet, and the meritocratic Gnostic Illuminati who control the U.S. military-industrial complex, multiple sources agree.  The battle is heading for a climax of sorts now that George Bush Senior has been “executed,” as confirmed by both Pentagon and CIA sources.

Here is what a CIA source had to say:

“I have been told by two sources that G.H.W. Scherff (Bush) was actually indicted on September 10, 2018 for crimes against humanity, child trafficking, sedition, and treason.  He allegedly plea-bargained a deal with the military tribunal hearing his case, to be executed/suicided to keep his legacy intact for his family and the sheeple.  Trump signed the death order.  So was it a clone that was executed, since we also have intel that he died in June (another clone).  I think Bush/Scherff actually died in January 1992, choking on sushi and then finished off by Barbara Bush with a poisoned cloth (as seen in the video posted last week).  Military tribunals are set to begin on January 2, 2019.”

Pentagon sources, for their part, said U.S. President Donald “Trump was careful not give Bush 41 a state funeral, as this executed criminal was denied a horse and caisson like Reagan got.”

“To the victor belong the spoils, for Trump picked former Bush Attorney General Bill Parr as his next AG and he chose ‘the day that will live in infamy,’ December 7th [the Pearl Harbor anniversary] to do it,” the Pentagon source added.

The CIA source also wondered if Barr made “a deal to avoid military tribunals and then be ‘McCained’? (the term being used lately for execution/suicide).  Maybe he flipped like Senator Lindsey Graham?”

The death of Bush, the former U.S. Ambassador to China whose brother handed over U.S. military secrets to that country (as did Hillary and Bill Clinton), means that the U.S. and China are also heading to a showdown as bloodline families seek Chinese protection, according to secret society sources.

Pentagon sources say the arrest of Chinese conglomerate Huawei’s Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou “is aimed to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

H.F.1764

 

*  *  *

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

 

Interview with Red Dragon Ambassador & White Dragon Benjamin Fulford

On the GoldFish Report No. 281, Louisa and Co-host Steve interview the spokesperson for the Red Dragon Family, The Ambassador, and the White Dragon Society spokesperson Benjamin Fulford for a discussion about the present economy, financial system, geopolitics, and what some of the obstacles have been to fulfilling the 555 Mission for Humanity that the Ambassador introduced over four years ago.

Benjamin explains a new system is possible and one that can operate parallel to the Belt and Road Initiative.  The Ambassador discusses the remit and surrender progress of the Old Guard and how it has been underway to make way for global economic prosperity and egalitarianism.

Benjamin agrees that the draining of the D.C swamp is where change has to happen first to trickle to other regions in the world.  This interview is packed with wisdom and perspective from behind-the-scenes, insider perspectives who want a better world for all people.  It gives you an insight as to how the real decision-makers of the world think and where they may need to rethink playing God.

The world is about to learn about Khazarian mafia crimes horrific beyond imagination

The Khazarian mafia have been torturing, murdering, and cannibalizing children on a horrific scale, and the world is about to find out as military tribunals begin.  Some very disturbing images and testimony sent by the New York Police Department and the CIA show just how evil the Khazarian mafia really is.  These people are beyond truth and reconciliation and do not deserve even a quick death.

Let us start with FBI statistics on missing children in the U.S., so that skeptics can prevent the sheer evil of these deeds from shutting their minds.  In 2015, 442,032 juveniles went missing;  of these, 42,032 were not found.
https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/2015-ncic-missing-person-and-unidentified-person-statistics.pdf/view

By comparison, in the same year in Japan 17,971 children (the equivalent of 44,927 in the U.S. when adjusted for population difference) went missing, and close to 99% of these children were found.
https://www.npa.go.jp/safetylife/seianki/fumei/H28yukuehumeisya.pdf

The photographs below, sent by the CIA, are linked to CNN star and FRB Vanderbilt heir Anderson Cooper and may give a hint as to what happened to at least some of these children.

Even more gruesome is the video still-shot linked below that was sent to the CIA via courier by the NYPD.  It shows a young girl whose face was allegedly peeled off by Hillary Clinton in a satanic ritual.  Be warned, it is graphic and I stopped watching shortly after the 2 minute mark.
https://youtu.be/zIbY6jyQpJ8

Now I begin to understand the look of sheer horror on the face of George Soros when I asked him a question at a press conference about the families that own the Federal Reserve Board (FRB).  He had probably seen some of this sort of stuff firsthand.

The prosecution of these criminals is set to finally start now that the U.S. military government backing President Donald Trump has secured a majority on the Supreme Court with the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Pentagon sources say.  “Attorney General Jeff Sessions has already met with the real special prosecutor, U.S. Attorney John Huber in Utah, so that the 57,000 indictments may be unsealed,” the sources explain.

“The seating of Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court should unleash declassification of FISA and other documents as well as military tribunals,” the sources say.  Furthermore they add, “The Senate unanimously approved a resolution calling for declassification of 9/11 documents, so the stage is set to take down the Zionists and the deep state.”

Another aspect to starting the prosecution of these criminals is the ongoing U.S./Russian military action against the rogue state of Israel, the sources say.  In particular, “Russian electronic warfare is aimed …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Warning from Singapore about Negatives of Meritocracy

Dear Ben,
Please reference the following article:
https://mothership.sg/2018/10/meritocracy-privilege-elitism-intolerance-problems/

While it may sound like a good idea to envision the future planning agency on meritocratic principles, the twin issues of privilege and elitism MUST be acknowledged as major stumbling blocks in meritocracy.

Otherwise, it will be a global case of what has been/is happening locally in Singapore.  Yes, the country is prosperous.  Yes, the country is advanced.  But at what cost?  Who here speaks for the homeless?  Who here helps the jobless?  Who here looks after the welfare of late bloomers?  Answer:  No one.

The general attitude here is “you die, your business” in Singlish, or “every man for himself” in English.  THAT is pragmatic meritocracy as practiced in Singapore.

The future planning agency of the WDS MUST look into the negatives of meritocracy, especially from the ground level in Singapore, and come up with game plans to effectively tackle these issues.  It is not sufficient to repeatedly hold the Singapore example up as a shining beacon to the rest of the world while conveniently sidestepping those who have fallen through the cracks;  never mind the “straitjacket society” that Singaporeans are loathe to live in.

Cheers,
—M


Hi M:
Yes, I am fully aware that Singapore is far from perfect in many ways.  We are planning to use the best parts of their system, but also intend to have a safety net based on best practices from around the world;  for example, the Scandinavian countries.
—BF


Hi Ben,
Thank you for the clarification.  Hopefully, a white paper could be published soon on the vision of the future planning agency, together with a public invitation for meaningful collaboration to make it even better.
—M

Urgent Request from Brazil

Hi Ben, how are you?

I don’t want to take too much of your time, so I’ll try to be brief.

In your last report (October 1, 2018), you spoke about Jair Bolsonaro, the right-wing candidate for Brazilian Presidency, as follows:

“Bolsonaro represents the Nazi/Zionist faction that has been looting Brazil’s resources and impoverishing its people, and so obviously they would be very scared of losing power.”

I totally believe you, but then you posted that letter from a Bolsonaro supporter that goes totally against that information and makes him a hero—the new Trump.

I can tell you for sure he is more a Nazi/Zionist than a new Trump.  He gets his support from the Evangelical Church, one of the most corrupt institutions in Brazil.  He supports dictatorship and the use of torture and he is not even ashamed of saying it on TV.  Because he knows his radical comments are not very welcomed to a good part of the population, he’s been skipping the debates with other candidates on TV even before he got stabbed.  Instead of debating, he’s using all his forces through fake news, using Whatsapp and Facebook groups, to blind his followers from reality.  He blames the media for everything, so that people only believe in his words.

It’s a very sad situation, especially when you know that the media was always actually against Dilma and Lula, and that’s why it got to play a huge role over the impeachment of Dilma and putting Lula in jail without concrete proof of anything.  Lula was by far the favorite candidate for presidency in 2018 and that’s why they did it.

On May 28th 2018, you posted another report that supports the fact that Bolsonaro is the bad guy, not Lula:

“Another blow against the Bush/Nazi faction of the cabal may come soon in the form of a military coup in Brazil, Pentagon sources are saying.  Here, a truckers’ strike has paralyzed the economy.  This is expected to be the trigger for a military coup that will restore former presidents Dilma Rousseff and Lula da Silva “from Zionist usurpers who seized control of the central bank in 2016,” the sources say.”

I kindly ask you to urgently communicate with your trustworthy sources to know what is really going on in Brazil and if possible give us a small report before this Sunday, as it is the Election Day.

For your information, your report from October 1st speaking about Bolsonaro was not even published in the Portuguese version.

https://benjaminfulfordtranslations.blogspot.com/search/label/BRAZILIAN

This has never occurred before and I am afraid the Zionists are blocking it.  That’s very serious, because there are a lot of people who get informed from alternative media like yours, and the Bolsonaro team knows it very well.

Thank you for your attention and for your great reports always.

—BM


OK, I will publish your letter and all I can say is that I hope the people of Brazil make a wise choice.
—BF


Much appreciated, although my intention was never to try to convince you of anything, but to push you to give us some information from your sources who know what is really going on.  At least people will get another perspective from my comment and get to make their own conclusions out of this.

It’s important to point out that Lula took millions of people out of poverty threshold, and that probably made the Zionists very mad, as these people would finally be able to have access to education, making them a bit harder to be enslaved and manipulated.

But with the Zionists in control of the mainstream media in Brazil, they were able to trigger the wrath of the middle classes against Lula, painting him and all his party as the bad guys (which many probably are, but not necessarily Lula).  And that’s how we got to the point where people prefer to have a dictatorship in place instead of having Lula’s party back.

—BM

Who’s the head of the Rockefeller clan?

Dear Ben,

I’m writing to ask how can we trust the WDS?  Duke Mehal Rockefeller is the current head of the Rockefeller clan, and is still trying to push the fake New Age Without Christ spirituality and can be seen wearing a white dragon ring.

How do you reconcile this?

Are we supposed to sit back and let the same families rule in the background?  Is Duke Mehal part of the P2 Lodge?  Why would Asian secret societies support a Rockefeller still?  Because the Rockefellers still have a base in China.  They wouldn’t have announced David Rockefeller’s death unless there was someone else to take his place.

How do you reconcile this?

—F


What is your source of information?  As far as I know, Mel Rockefeller, the son of Nelson Rockefeller, is the new head of that clan.  Hillary Clinton is actually Hillary Rockefeller, and we are removing them from power as you can see in the news.

I have never heard of “Duke Mehal Rockefeller,” and if he exists, he was nothing to do with the White Dragon Society.  It sounds like a psy-op to me.

—BF

2018-10-13

 

H.F.730

*  *  *

LITTLEJOHN

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: May should have solved this 'migrant crisis' in 2016'

 Government ignored the problem of illegals crossing the Channel when it
first surfaced more than two-and-a-half years ago.

 

READERS of a certain age will remember the famous Eighties TV commercial for an insurance company that promised:

'We wont make a drama out of a crisis.'

The advert was intended to reassure customers that no matter what calamity might befall them, their problems would be solved with  the minimum of fuss.

Sadly, it's a message that has been lost on our modern generation of politicians, who are guaranteed to turn any minor hiccup into a full-blown, multi-million dollar Hollywood production number.

Not that there's anything minor about the current cross-Channel traffic in illegal immigrants coming ashore on the Kent coast in increasing numbers. Since the story exploded on a slow news day over Christmas, the Government  has gone into full headless chicken mode.

With great fanfare, Home Secretary Sajid Javid cuts short his family holiday in Africa to fly home and 'take control' of the situation. Everything is going according to the script. Javid arrives back in the middle of the night and changes from jeans and zipper jacket into his

'I'm in Charge' blue suit.

Hours later, he leaves his London home through a scrum of telivision reporters shouting inane questions, which they know perfectly well he has no intention of answering.

He convenes emergency meetings in Whitehall , then announcing a plan of action despite admitting in a newspaper article that, actually, there's very little he can do to stop the influx of Iranians and other assorted foreign nationals making their way across the Channel.

Javid could order the Navy to turn back any dinghy bound for Kent and return any passengers to France.

But he's already rejected an offer of naval assistance from Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson because he doesn't want Williamson to gain any political advantage at his expense.

STILL he has to be seen to be doing something, anything, to justify his dash back from his safari holiday. How long before Javid is filmed heading out to sea on the prow of a coastguard boat, like George Washington leading his troops across  the Delaware River during the American Revolution-only in a hi-viz jacket, rather than a general's uniform and tricorn hat.

Mind you, given this Government's track record of dealing with illegal immigration, a better analogy would be  Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet on the Titanic. All that matters is that Javid creates an impression of frantic activity, with him at the centre of it.

None of this would be necessary, of course, had the Government not ignored the problem of illegals crossing the Channel when it first surfaced more than two-and-a-half years ago.

It's not as if they didn't know it was happening. Between March and May 2016, there were at least eight recorded incidents of Border Force officials intercepting attempts to enter Britain by boat, via beaches in Kent and Sussex.

On May 31 that year, after 18 Albanians were picked up in a  rubber dinghy off Kent I wrote a spoof Shipping Forecast, illustrated by a Gary cartoon, of a country under siege from foreign nationals on a variety of inflatables.

 

Here's the flavour of it.

'Forties, Dogger. High chance of Iraqis, pretending to be Syrians, seen clinging to lilos near North Sea oil rig, bound for Bridlington...'

You get the idea. And still they kept coming , unhindered, throughout the summer. In September 2016, the Mail's Sue Reid hired out a small inflatable boat in France and sailed across the Channel to Dover. She passed a French coastguard vessel, a naval patrol and landed safely without anyone challenging her or asking to see her passport

Six days earlier, a group of illegal immigrants  had jumped off a private boat near Felixstowe, in Suffolk, and simply vanished.

In November 2016, I returned to the subject, when a man who claimed to be Iranian, but probably wasn't, was found rowing towards Britain in an inflatable kayak.

I wrote at the time: 'Instead of towing him back to Calais, he was rescued and given a lift to Croydon , where his asylum claim was processed. If the authorities aren't going to deport them to France, it will only encourage even more desperate illegals to attempt the hazardous journey in everything from children's paddling pools to inflatable armbands...

'I don't know if anyone has yet landed in Margate clinging to one of Del Boy's blow-up sex dolls, but, at any rate, it can only be a

MATTER OF TIME...

 

[We are only half-way through this article but we are sure you get the full picture of the ease in which illegals can enter our country, and the total failure of successive governments to stop it. But it is no surprise when you list the many failures of policy on matters essential to  the DEFENCE of the REALM and LAW and ORDER...  over decades, which we have shown on our website, that one wonders what use many of our politicians are when the same shortcomings arise year after year and decade after decade. The dilatory way that BREXIT -the voice of 17.4 million  People - has been handled, has confirmed this unfortunate trend.]

 

TO BE CONTINUED SHORTLY

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: May should have solved this 'migrant crisis' in 2016'

 

*  *  *

 

JANUARY 1,2019

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS-CHANGES OF FORM- ARE OURS]

 

H.F.1772

 

 

 

 
LITTLEJOHN

 

 

I'm a

Brexiteer

Get me

OUT

of here!

 

*....MY BEST guess on Brexit has always been that a dirty deal was done before the Chequers ambush in the summer

Mother Theresa would present her shabby withdrawal agreement, certain in the knowledge that it would never get the support of her own party, let alone the House of Commons.

But in the process, she would shed the most truculent Brexiteers from her Government and eventually, pull a rabbit from the hat at the last minute which would allow her to plot a marshmallow soft Brexit-in-name-only through Parliament.

I assumed the EU's grand panjandrums were fully on board with this cynical stitch-up, whatever noises they made for public consumption

. If there's one thingJean- Paul-Georges-et Ringo would love more than the UK crawling back into the fold, tail between legs. It's, Mrs May's craven plan to keep us in their orbit as a serf state, under the thumb but shorn mof all influence.

Up until yesterday, anyway, everything was going according to plan. That was before she bottled putting her 'deal' to the vote, when the overwhelming scale of her looming defeat became apparent.

No prime Minister could have survived in office given the hammering she would have taken in the division lobbies. So, instead of scuttling off to Brussels begging for more pre-arranged concessions' after a slim mdefeat in Parliament, she has been forced to step back from the abyss.

Now what?

Theresa says she intends to return to the EU to seek further 'reassurance' on the Irish backstop. Be honest, have you any idea what this 'backstop' nonsense is all about?  It's an elaborate smoke-screen dreamed up to stop a proper Brexit.

LONG story short, without going into teeth-grindingly boring detail, it is designed to divide Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK and ensure that we can never, ever,leave the EU's cuastoms union, without the permission of our

SO-CALLED 'PARTNERS.

That pipsqueak ingrate Irish premier Lenny Verruca didn't do Mrs May any favours yesterday, either, dancing a jig to the Brussels tune and issuing empty threats against a benevolent, and much larger, neighbour which kept his country afloat during difficult economic times.

Of all the horror stories put about by

PROJECT FEAR

the warnings about Brexit imperilling the Irish peace process are by far and away the

MOST DESPICABLE.

It is an insult not just to Britain but to the Irish people themselves, on whichever side of the political divide, who have invested so much in resolving their differences.

For opportunist politicians to exploit

GOODWILL

with incendiary remarks about reigniting violence is beneath contempt.

So, too, the garbage about children going hungry because school meals won't be available after Brexit, or people dying from lack of imported medicines. Enough, already.

Look, I say again, even hardline 'no deal' Brexiteers like me accept that there will have to be some compromises if we are to

GET OUT OF THE EU

in one piece.

But the antics of the political class have been shameful, an insult to the intelligence of every single one of us who pay their wages.

As I said last week,

WHO CAN YOU TRUST ?

With a few honourable exceptions, their collective behaviour as been

SELF-SERVING and DISGRACEFUL.

I admired Boris for having the courage to come out in favour of

LEAVE

even if he did take for ever to weigh his options.

He should have got the top job after the referendum, but was carved up by his oppo Michael Gove, who clearly still fancies his own chances of becoming Prime Minister. Don't they all?

But when Boris turned up on TV at the weekend with a smart new haircut, my heart sank.

This is no longer about

BREXIT

It's about

HIM.

THEN I read that Boris is apparently part of a Tory leadership dream ticket with Amber Rudd. I'm sorry, I'll just read that again. This is the same Look back in Amber who not so long ago was slagging off Boris, accusing him of not being safe in taxis.

Now were asked to believe they're Westminster's lovey-dovey answer to Seann and Katya whoever they are). I'm only surprised that Amber hasn't had a Mrs Thatcher perm-that's if Esther Mc Rantzen, or whatever her name is, hasn't beaten her to it.

And so this is Christmas, and what have they done? Apart from squabbling among themselves-

NOTHING.

My best guess is still that a grubby deal has been done and may yet be revived.

But after yesterday, I wouldn't bank on anything any more.

The political class must think that we're so stupid and bored with the whole business that we'll accept any deal they can cobble together.

And, you know what , sadly maybe they're right.

I'm a Brexiteer. Get me

OUT

 of here!

*  *  *

[The present political system is bankrupt. Only PR can save our nation from eventual Despotism. AS we have stated over the past decades Members of Parliament should ONLY serve one TERM in office which should ensure that MPs will in the main do the best they can for THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS and THEIR COUNTRY.  It will ensure that those from all  walks of life have the opportunity to SERVE THEIR PEOPLE and THEIR COUNTRY. Not as now when the greater majority have decided ONLY TO

SERVE THEMSELVES.]

*

*...HOWEVER brexit works out, or doesn't

, there seems to be no end to mass immigration. The number of EU citizens settling in Britain may have fallen since the referendum, but arrivals from the rest of the world have hit a 14 year high.

A quarter of a million more people came here from outside the EU than left in the past year, an increase of 40 per cent. It was another triumph for Mother Theresa,who-don't forget-was in charge of

IMMIGRATION

at the

HOME OFFICE

until the the keys to Number 10 dropped into her lap...

 

*  *  *

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: I'm a Brexiteer get me out of here! | Daily Mail...

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

DECEMBER 11,2018

H.F.1763

[ A MATTER OF FACT!]

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Leaving the European Union is taking longer than it did to defeat Hitler and his Nazi Germany

732

View
comments

What right does Soros have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy?

Two years down the drain. Two years of vacillation, obfuscation, cowardice, sabotage and outright betrayal. And that's just from our own Government.

 

On June 23, 2016, in a referendum, 17.4 million people voted to leave the European Union.

No ifs, no buts.

The question on the ballot paper was unambiguous, the so-called catastrophic consequences spelled out in plain English in a brochure distributed to every single home in the country by a Government which was desperate to Remain.

Campaigning was exhaustive, lasting six whole months. We knew exactly what voting Leave would mean. 

 

No single market, no customs union,

 no more submitting to the jurisdiction of European courts. 

Recent developments could mean leaving the European Union will take longer than it did to defeat Hitler and Nazi Germany, writes Richard Littlejohn

We would be retaking control of our borders, our laws, our traditional territorial waters and our national destiny.

Project Fear did its worst and failed. More people voted Leave than have ever voted for anything in our history. By now, we should be as good as gone, with only a few minor details to be ironed out.

Yet two years on, just as I feared, we're no nearer the exit. Every day seems to bring yet another blatant attempt to derail the process, to keep us subjugated in perpetuity as prisoners of a sclerotic, anti-democratic European superstate.

The latest comes from a group bankrolled by the billionaire hedge funder George Soros, a Hungarian-born American who made his fortune betting against the pound on Black Wednesday in 1992.

Having earned the nickname of the Man Who Broke The Bank Of England, he is now determined to become The Man Who Broke The Will Of The British People.

What right does Soros have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy?

Yet the same people here who are squealing about Russia meddling in the U.S. election (because that delivered the 'wrong' result, too) are cheering him on.

This self-appointed fifth column will stop at nothing to overturn the referendum result. The stitch-up started the moment the result was announced.

We've had endless legal challenges, and the disgraceful attempts by the unelected, self-serving Lords to stop Brexit.

Project Fear — far from admitting it lost fair and square, packing up its tent and going home —has been ramping up the volume, aided and abetted by the BBC, the Financial Times and the political establishment.

The head of Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, John Thompson, joined in this week, warning that technology designed to keep trade flowing seamlessly after Brexit would cost businesses £20 billion and take at least three years to introduce after the proposed 'transition' period is due to end.

 

What right does [George] Soros (pictured) have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy? Asks Richard Littlejohn

Such a delay would keep us in the customs union until December 2023. That's seven years after we voted Leave — longer than it took us to defeat Nazi Germany.

Thompson obviously hadn't read Robert Hardman's brilliant dispatch in last Saturday's Mail from the port of Felixstowe, where a comparable system works without a hitch and could easily be applied elsewhere, including the Irish border.

The governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, a siren voice of Project Fear, waded back in by claiming every British family would be 'up to potentially' £900 a year worse off after Brexit.

What does 'up to potentially' actually mean? I'll tell you — he made it up. It's a guess, pure and simple. This figure is about as accurate as all the other scaremongering forecasts the Bank put out during the referendum.

Carney, a Canadian, is one of the worst of the Remoaner stooges. He's supposed to be independent, but owes his job to the political establishment. 

He maintains Brexit will be a retrograde step, an economic disaster, but at the same time is said to harbour ambitions of becoming the next Prime Minister of proudly independent Canada.

So let him explain something. This time last year, I was sitting in a waterfront seafood restaurant on the Detroit River, looking across at Windsor, Ontario.

The distance from the U.S. to Canada at this point is about the width of the Thames at Dartford. 

The governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, a siren voice of Project Fear, waded back in by claiming every British family would be 'up to potentially' £900 a year worse off after Brexit

Every day thousands of trucks trundle across the border in either direction, carrying imports and exports of everything from car components to Canadian bacon.

If Carney does stand as PM, will he tell his fellow countrymen that all this trade will have to stop unless they agree to be ruled by America, have their laws decided in Washington and surrender the right to decide who lives in their country? Of course not.

So why should the prosperity of Britain, the world's fifth biggest economy, be determined by whether or not we belong to the EU and take orders from Brussels? 

Look, we expect Remoaners to insult our intelligence, tell us we were too stupid to know what we were voting for, and fight to the last ditch to stop us leaving.

We just have to live with it, although I can do without the constant bombardment of anti-Brexit lies and intimidation masquerading as 'news' which seems to dominate every TV and radio bulletin.

Labour is a lost cause, too. Despite promising in its last manifesto to respect the Brexit vote, Labour is now only interested in bringing down the Government — even if that means betraying the millions of traditional Labour supporters who voted Leave.

My biggest worry all along has been the Tory Government itself, even before Theresa May sacrificed her majority in that vainglorious General Election last year.

Regular readers will know I'm no fan of Mother Theresa. I thought Boris deserved the job when Call Me Dave committed hara-kiri. 

He was the figurehead for the Leave campaign and the spoils should have gone to the victor.

Theresa May's (pictured) inherent indecision, which has characterised her career, has enabled the opponents of Brexit to seize the initiative at every turn

If he'd screwed up, we'd be no worse off than we are now. At least Boris believed — and still believes — in Brexit and is about the only Cabinet voice making an optimistic case for our bright global future once we can break free of the EU yoke.

Frankly, I've never thought Mother Theresa was up to the job. I'm not even sure her heart is in leaving the EU, despite promising that 'Brexit means Brexit'.

She's bungled the negotiations, has been captured by the Civil Service and has allowed herself to be bullied not just by Barnier and his team, but by the Remainiacs in her own party.

Tory Brexiteers aren't 'rebels', as they are frequently described disparagingly. They were on the winning side and speak for 17.4 million people, outside the Westminster bubble, not a handful of hardcore metropolitan malcontents.

May's inherent indecision, which has characterised her career, has enabled the opponents of Brexit to seize the initiative at every turn.

She should never have agreed to give the EU a penny, let alone £39 billion as a basis for negotiation, and she should have simply ignored their cynical posturing over the Irish border. 

Allowing them to raise the spectre of a return to violence was monstrous.

They're doing it again over the Galileo satellite project, saying the UK will be denied vital defence intelligence. 

Two can play at that game. Our response should be to tell the EU that they can forget about any co-operation from GCHQ, Scotland Yard and British security services.

And anyway, our American allies have got a perfectly good satellite system which they are happy to share with us. Have a nice day.

Mrs May hasn't had a bad three months, after her trials and tribulations last year. Is it too much to hope that she might be emboldened to take a tougher line on Brexit, at home and abroad.

She should start immediately by creating 800 new peers. They will only be appointed if they agree to two conditions: 1) Vote through all Brexit legislation. 2) Once that's done, they must vote for the abolition of the House of Lords.

Their reward will be that they can keep the titles, which will help them secure a few directorships and jump the queue at fashionable restaurants. Trust me, there'd be no shortage of applicants.

As I've long maintained, we won't get an acceptable deal from the EU negotiators unless Mrs May is prepared to walk away, Renee. Shamefully, the Government seems ill prepared for No Deal.

Nobody should need reminding that Europe has more to lose than Britain — both economically and militarily. 

Surrendering to every demand from Brussels is not, and should not be, an option. Nor is trying to appease the Remainers in her own party.

Do the Soubrys, Morgans and Grieves really want to risk bringing down their own Government and ushering in the Corbyn terror? May should read them the riot act — not demonise Jacob Rees-Mogg, who is only speaking for the majority of voters.

If the PM has learned one thing this year it is that standing up to bullies pays off. Her popularity and reputation rocketed at home and abroad when she faced down Putin over the Salisbury poisoning.

If Mother Theresa can find the courage to stand up to Russia, then isn't it time, after two years of vacillation and capitulation, that she summoned up the backbone to face down the EU?

 

[BUT WILL SHE?]

*

 


READ  MORE: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5769361/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-Brexit-taking-longer-defeating-Hitler-Nazi-Germany.html#ixzz5GW1KGJ2C
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on FAcebook

 

H.F.1555

 

News for DAILY MAIL-UK pays worst state pension in the developed world

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension in the developed world with a basic payout of £122.30 a week

  • The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West 
  • Former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get worse 
  • Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found.

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings – and last night former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get even worse.

Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70, while future payments could be cut even further to avoid needing massive hikes in national insurance, Baroness Altmann said.

 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found

The league table revealing Britain's pension shame was compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which analyses the world's industrialised nations. 

Out of all the countries compared, Britain comes bottom – even behind poorer nations such as Chile, Poland and Mexico.

While the UK's state pension is worth just 29 per cent of average earnings, in France the equivalent figure is 74.5 per cent. 

Germany's state pension is worth 50.5 per cent of average earnings, while in the USA it is 49.1 per cent. 

The most generous state pension in the world is in the Netherlands, where the payments are slightly higher than average earnings.

 

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings. File photo

Baroness Altmann warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it. 

She said: 'We are one of the world's leading economies, but our support for the oldest in society is not fit for purpose.

'In April 2016, major reforms to the UK state pension were supposed to have made the system affordable for the future, reducing its generosity. Beyond the 2030s, the new state pension will be lower than the old system for most people and the lowest paid, predominantly women, will lose significantly from the new system.

'Despite this, the Government has been advised that the costs of paying state pensions will soar so much over the next 20 years and beyond that further cuts could be required.'

From later this year the state pension age for women will rise from 63 to match men at 65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.

Baroness Ros Altmann (pictured) warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it

The Government's economic forecasters, the Actuary's Department, believes it will become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the 2060s.

This would mean that anyone aged 30 or below now will not get their state pension until they are 70, while those under 20 will have to wait until they are 71.

Baroness Altmann added: 'The Government actuary believes that just funding the UK's exceptionally low state pension will require reducing payments in future or dramatic tax rises. Policymakers face difficult decisions and are also likely to need to increase the state pension age further.'

The former pensions minister called on the Government to do more to address the crisis, including making private pensions more attractive so that more people are willing to pay a portion of their wages into their own fund.

'To avoid burdening younger generations with significant tax rises, it is vital that more is done to boost private pension saving,' she added. 'Auto-enrolment is a good start, but the pensions industry needs to attract more customers to pay more into their pensions.' 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5379521/Britain-pays-retirees-worst-state-pension.html#ixzz56thYQdgc
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[IT IS IRONIC THAT IT WAS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHICH INTRODUCED THE STATE PENSION  OVER A HUNDRED YEARS AGO BY WINSTON CHURCHILL YET AS SHOWN ABOVE IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY BOTH THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES TO THE PRESENT LEVEL AS THE POOREST PENSIONERS OF THE 24 DEVELOPED NATIONS WITH A PERCENTAGE OF THE AVERAGE WAGE OF 29PER CENT-WHEREAS THE TOP NATION NETHERLANDS PAYS 100.6 %. WITH THE CITY MILE BEING BAILED OUT WITH 45 BILLION OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY.]

-A GREEDY SQUARE MILE AND PARSIMONIOUS STATE PENSION YET OUR OVERSEAS AID IS SQUANDERED AND WASTED WITH THE CHARITIES IN THE MAIN GAUGING THEMSELVES WITH HIGH LIVING-AND NOW WE HEAR EVEN PROSTITUTION IS CONSIDERED A PERK OF THE JOB.  THERE APPEARS NO ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT OF CHARITIES TO ENSURE THAT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE FOR THE TRUE NEEDY NOT FOR FUN AND GAMES AND TERRORISTS OR HIGH LIVING OF THOSE RECEIVING THE TAXPAYERS HARD EARNED REMUNERATION WHILE MANY OF THE CONTRIBUTORS ARE IN GREAT PAIN AND MANY DYING WHICH COULD BE GREATLY REDUCED IF CHARITY BEGAN AT HOME.  TO BOAST OF BEING THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO OVERSEAS AID WHILE A GREAT NUMBER OF OUR CITIZENS PARTICULARLY THE POOR AND A NUMBER OF THE ELDERLY  ARE SUFFERING IN ORDER THAT THE TOP OF THE FOREIGN AID LIST IS MAINTAINED.

HOW IS IT THAT THE OTHER 23 NATIONS CAN PROVIDE A HIGHER STATE PENSION? WHAT IS PREVENTING WESTMINSTER FROM BRINGING OUR STATE PENSION UP TO AT LEAST THE AVERAGE OF THOSE ON THE LIST BELOW WHICH CONTAINS MANY NATIONS WHICH CAN HARDLY BE  CONSIDERED RICH COMPARED TO THE UK. IS IT THAT IN THOSE COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE ARE

 PUT FIRST! - NOT LAST?

THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE FEEDING OFF THE PUBLIC PURSE WITH THEIR OBSCENE RATES OF SALARY AND GOLDEN PENSION-POSSIBLY SO LONG AS THEY ARE COMFORTABLE THEY HAVE NO THOUGHT FOR THOSE WHO PAID FOR THEIR LAVISH LIFESTYLE?

PAYOUT AS PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE WAGE
Netherlands   -  100.6%

Portugal        -   94.9%

Italy             -  93.2%

Austria         -  91.8%

Spain             -  81.8%

Denmark        -  80.2%

France            -  74.5%

Belgium          -  66.1%

Finland         -  65%

Czech Republic-60%

Sweden         -  54.9%

Canada          -  53.4%

OECD average=62.9

 

Germany    -    50.5%

USA            -    49.1%

Norway      -    48.8%

Switzerland    -    44.9%

New Zealand   -  43.2%

Australia     -    42.6%

Ireland        -   42.3%

Chile         -     40.1%

Japan           -  40%

Poland       -      38.6%

Mexico         -     29.6%

UK  -  29%

Source-OECD

*

LATEST!

ON THE CONTINUING GROWTH OF THE GROTESQUE AND WASTEFUL VANITY PROJECT

FOREIGN AID BUDGET

DAILY MAIL

OCTOBER 30, 2018

Foreign Aid will top £14bn a year
 

Britain's foreign Aid budget will soar by £230million next year, taking it above£14billion for the first time

The UK is committed to spend 0.7per cent of its national income on aid.

Britain is one of only seven countries in the world to meet the target.

The foreign aid budget soared by £555million to a record £13.9billion last year. Our aid budget has more than doubled from the £6.4billion spent in 2008 and more than quadrupled from the £3.3billion doled out in 2002.

[Why with such vast sums to alleviate the distress around the world are we still seeing adverts on our television screens for such a basic-common and vital need as drinking water?]

 

With billions spread abroad like confetti why are UK state pensions not up with the best in Europe. With a strongly extreme Left Labour Party we would have expected them to have this at the top of their agenda-If it is-they are keeping it a SECRET!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 30, 2018

 

H.F.1716

 

 

 

How Britain is ruled by patronising

 

 

B*#*@:rds

 by QUENTIN LETTS

 

A rebellion has taken place in this country of ours, an uprising, a new Peasants’ Revolt. A real kick in the kidneys for Britain’s ruling elite.

Before the EU referendum in 2016, the electorate was told firmly what to do. A vote for Remain would be safe and strong, and woe betide the country if you were stupid enough to back Brexit. You know your duty, little ones, said the elite. Sod that, said the people.

In the greatest citadel-storming since the French Revolution, they chose to leave the obtrusive European Union.

But it was not a result that happened by accident. It was born of a weary truculence — a yeoman impatience with those who make up our smug, self-perpetuating, invisible Brahmin caste.

Before the EU referendum in 2016, the electorate was told firmly what to do. A vote for Remain would be safe and strong, and woe betide the country if you were stupid enough to back Brexit. You know your duty, little ones, said the elite. Sod that, said the people

The government machine was used remorselessly to help Remain. We were muck-spreadered with warnings of hideous consequences from Brexit. The Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, was mobilised. His friend George Osborne was Chancellor and, so far as the two of them could see, Remain was bound to win, and Clever George would become prime minister before the next general election

For decades, Britons have been bossed about by a cadre of administrators and managers and pose-striking know-alls.

The old aristocracy having faded, in came a more furtive elite, driven by the desire to own minds, not acres, determined to control opinion and dictate our attitudes.

It was done on the sly, of course. They posed as liberals, and crouched behind ‘enlightened’ attitudes while imposing their views on a populace they claimed to esteem but more truthfully disdained.

 

Politicians, civil servants and lawyers used a language few could understand, while government was farmed out to agencies and quangos and privatised supply companies.

Cheap labour was imported, suppressing workers’ wages, because that was what globalised boss-cats at the international forums said was necessary.

Could we criticise immigration? Only if we wanted to be called racists and fruitcakes. The elite’s media munchkins had placed it on the top shelf, somewhere safe where it could not be touched.

 

At the gates to the Palace of Westminster I bumped into pro-Leave Tory MP Kwasi Kwarteng, a great bear of a man. ‘This is bigger than any general election result,’ he boomed

Against our will, children were exposed to sex education by schools more interested in dogma than declension. Sex crimes rocketed.

Sociologists said murderers must be released into the community. Re-offending rates rose.

Smokers were made to feel like criminals. Criminals were encouraged to sue their victims.

From every side came instruction as to what we must think: about diet, gender, sexuality, race, even the weather, with the TV forecasters telling us to put on sun cream and giving silly names to every incoming squall.

The entire System was at it, badgering us, belittling us, patting us on the head, putting us in our place.

Think this. Don’t think that. Inappropriate! Hate-crime!

From the Chief Medical Officer and her strictures about alcohol limits to railway announcements saying ‘do not become a victim of crime’, they treat us like toddlers.

Even the most docile beach donkey, by nature placid and reliable, if repeatedly kicked, will eventually refuse to co-operate. It will bare its teeth and walk in the other direction, pulling its tethers out of the sand.

So it has proved with the British voters.

Get off our backs, they said. Stop goading us. Stop being such patronising bastards.

The morning we discovered we’d break free from Europe was that unforgettable Friday, June 24, 2016.

Everywhere, celebrity luvvies hyperventilated. Actress Amanda Abbington (she was Dr Watson’s wife in Sherlock on the telly) messaged: ‘Watch the collapse begin. Dark days . . . Where can I move me and my children too (sic)? Where’s nice? Italy? Canada?’ They might have better grammar there, certainly. Keira Knightley was foul-mouthed. ‘Stop others f***ing with your future,’ she bleated in a message to yoof

I was in a pokey hotel bedroom in London’s Bloomsbury and awoke at daybreak as the television relayed the referendum results from around the country.

I’d expected the technocracy was going to win. It always did, didn’t it? The experts had said defeat for Remain was unthinkable. Treasury officials, opinion pollsters and almost the entire diplomatic corps idly presumed Remain would win.

But it hadn’t.

Our dominating elite of parliamentarians, lobbyists, bankers, artists, political theorists, clergy, academics and sterile aesthetes was about to take a massive custard pie smack in the face.

So many well-connected people had scoffed at Brexit. They had belittled anyone who suggested it could occur.

But there it was, happening before our eyes as the BBC’s presenter, David Dimbleby, announced: ‘The British people have spoken and the answer is “we’re out!”.’

The cold print of the referendum ballot papers had merely asked voters if they wanted to stay in the EU. This result was the crystallisation of something bigger.

It was the eruption of a long-building resentment at being bossed around by an opaque snootocracy, by affluent fixers and the People Who Know Best.

 

James Corden, who left Britain to present a TV show in California, transmitted from across the water: ‘I’m so sorry to the youth of Britain. I feel you’ve been let down today. x’

In my hotel room on that Independence Dawn last year, I felt a giddying rush of patriotic pride. The apple-cart had been overturned.

This was not just a public rejection of the EU. It was an act of thrilling dissent. Our arrogant elite, after years of self-enriching condescension, had been whupped.

More than a year on, I still can’t get out of my head how unrelenting the campaign was for Remain to win the popular vote.

For months before the referendum, the System did its best to engineer things in favour of the EU.

Cabinet Brexiteers were silenced. Civil servants were told to hide sensitive EU material from Eurosceptic ministers.

The government machine was used remorselessly to help Remain. We were muck-spreadered with warnings of hideous consequences from Brexit. The Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, was mobilised.

His friend George Osborne was Chancellor and, so far as the two of them could see, Remain was bound to win, and Clever George would become prime minister before the next general election.

Carney, a Canadian but bound to the status quo here by instinct and career, predicted Brexit would cause sterling to collapse, growth to stall and unemployment to rise.

From comedians to bishops (hard to say which of those two groups is funnier), fund managers to charity-sector tsars, Brexit was as pongy as a bad sardine. They did not just oppose it. They recoiled from it.

The reaction was not simply intellectual or even political. It was rooted in taste, aesth- etics, manners.

Let your future son-in-law have tombstone teeth, the clothes sense of Ken Dodd and a string of shoplifting offences to his name, but pray God Almighty he be not a Brexiteer.

We no longer have widowed duchesses who clutch their dewlaps in horror when they hear the word ‘serviette’, but Brexit had the same effect on managerial and technocratic types.

My wife, a sweet and liberal-minded soul, casually mentioned to a princeling of the Church of England that she intended to vote Leave. He gasped: ‘How could you?’ He might have been less aghast had she admitted to witchcraft.

 

From J. K. Rowling came: ‘I don’t think I’ve ever wanted magic more’

Fashionable ‘opinion leaders’ and pliable industrialists were pressed to the Remain cause to build the idea that superior people — good people — were of one accord. They crouched down beside the voters, looked them very gravely in the eye and told the boys and girls that Mummy and Daddy would be really, really sad if Remain did not win the referendum.

Opinion pollsters said Remain would win, and in the last week of the campaign the Cameroons started to strut.

Two days before the referendum, Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee, la-di-dah Leftist and one-time owner of the most perfect villa in Italy, opined that the result was in the bag. The headline over her article read: ‘On Friday I’ll get my country back. Britain will vote Remain’.

But the voters came to a different conclusion. They decided that those prominent Remain supporters were only in it for themselves, chasing either business contracts or honours.

The Leavers were the ones who reclaimed their country. On the morning after the referendum, I headed from my hotel to work in a taxi whose driver was cock-a-hoop at the Leave vote. At the gates to the Palace of Westminster I bumped into pro-Leave Tory MP Kwasi Kwarteng, a great bear of a man. ‘This is bigger than any general election result,’ he boomed. He was right. General elections are elections for Parliament. The referendum was an election against Parliament, in spite of Parliament.

Abraham Lincoln once spoke of ‘government of the people, by the people, for the people’. We had drifted towards ‘government of the people, by the Parliament, for the Parliament and its fleas’.

The Establishment reacted with petulant disbelief.

Tony Blair called it ‘a foolish excursion into populism’. The then Lib Dem leader Tim Farron, 46, normally a sunny fellow, was ‘angry that today we wake to a deeply divided country’. Would he have said the same if the scores had gone the other way?

Everywhere, celebrity luvvies hyperventilated.

Actress Amanda Abbington (she was Dr Watson’s wife in Sherlock on the telly) messaged: ‘Watch the collapse begin. Dark days . . . Where can I move me and my children too (sic)? Where’s nice? Italy? Canada?’ They might have better grammar there, certainly. 

Keira Knightley was foul-mouthed. ‘Stop others f***ing with your future,’ she bleated in a message to yoof. James Corden, who left Britain to present a TV show in California, transmitted from across the water: ‘I’m so sorry to the youth of Britain. I feel you’ve been let down today. x.’

From J. K. Rowling came: ‘I don’t think I’ve ever wanted magic more.’ TV presenter and sometime footballer Gary Lineker asked: ‘What have we gone and done?’

The mood at Glastonbury pop festival was funereal. Coldplay’s Chris Martin saw ‘the collapse of a country’. Damon Albarn wore a black armband.

Marianne Faithfull, famous because decades earlier she was supposed to have done something filthy with a Mars Bar and Mick Jagger, said: ‘We are back to where it used to be, the Right-wing racist Little England. Those dreadful people, they’ve always been there.’

TV presenter and sometime footballer Gary Lineker asked: ‘What have we gone and done?’ The mood at Glastonbury pop festival was funereal. Coldplay’s Chris Martin saw ‘the collapse of a country’

Emma Thompson, mother, director, writer, actress, intellectual, citizen, was, naturally, appalled by Brexit. She said she felt more European than English and she regarded Ukip’s Nigel Farage as a ‘white nationalist’.

Where that left the many non-white Leave voters and non-white Ukip supporters, it was hard to say.

The Remain camp united atheists and the modern Church of England, with former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and arch-atheist Richard Dawkins deploring the result. Science bod Dawkins, who has made a study of natural selection, raged that the voters had been ‘ill-informed’ and ‘ignorant’. Personally, I blame evolution.

Another secularist, A. C. Grayling, wrote to MPs demanding that they reject the will of the people who, said Grayling, had voted on the basis of ‘demagoguery and sentiment’.

Too many voters were merely ‘System One’ thinkers, he argued — i.e. they acted chiefly on impulse and could be ‘captured by slogans’, unlike ‘System Two’ thinkers who made more considered, logical judgments.

Shades here, of the Greek philosopher Plato, who regarded democracy as rule by the rabble and proposed the creation of elite ‘Guardians’ or ‘Philosopher Kings’ who could be selected in youth and trained to rule.

Plato’s thinking is most clearly seen today in the French grandes écoles that train the cadre of Brussels Eurocrats who propose and draft EU treaties.

Tony Blair made a speech calling on people to ‘rise up against’ ... er, themselves, basically.

Time and again it was argued by anti-Brexiteers that Leave voters did not understand the vastness of their decision.

The elite was indignant and fearful — and that only made many Leave voters all the more certain they had made the right decision.

In their appalling condescension, what all these furious anti-Brexiteers ignored were people such as a Derbyshire factory worker called Stuart Carrington and the other 17,410,741 men and women who had voted to Leave.

Stuart had also been on my mind that anxious night as we waited for the referendum result. He was my brother-in-law. (Well, as good as. He and my wife’s sister Nicky were not formally married but they had been together years.)

Fifty-four-year-old Stuart’s health had become a worry in recent months. Out of character, he took time off work. Stuart’s machine, capable of the most intricate measurements, checked parts for aircraft jet engines.

He was proud of his work, just as he was proud of Nicky, her two sons and their flat. But he knew all that was coming to an end.

The doctors initially told him he had a low-threat cancer but they changed their prognosis. That week we were told he was dying.

Yet on referendum day morning, moving with difficulty, he had managed to get himself to his local polling station in the Spital district of Chesterfield, to vote for the last time.

A gaunt figure, he leaned heavily on the stubby pencil while casting his vote. Job done, he carefully dropped his ballot into the box, thanked the officials, winced a little and made slowly for the door.

A keen supporter of Leave — and normally a Labour man, his dad having been a miner — Stuart had been determined to vote and he had bloody well managed it.

I kept thinking of stoical, taciturn Stuart.

Those northern men don’t always say much but by God they make their mark. Stuart was not a showy person. He did not consider himself important, not in the way we normally use that term.

Not back then. Maybe things are a little different now. Maybe, with Brexit, the balance of power has shifted a little.

Maybe, but I wouldn’t bank on it.

As I will show in the rest of this series based on my new book, the patronising bastards are everywhere, lording it over the plebs, putting us in our place, waving their entitlement in our face, telling us what to think and what to do.

And not just over Brexit but on every issue under the sun.

And the biggest ‘bastard’ of them all, at the very top of my list of patricians treating the rest of us with contempt? I’ll reveal his identity on Monday.

Adapted from Patronising Bastards: How The Elites Betrayed Britain, by Quentin Letts, published by Constable on October 12 at £16.99. © Quentin Letts 2017. To order a copy for £13.59 (offer valid to October 14, 2017) visit www.mailshop.co.uk/books or call 0844 571 0640. P&P is free on orders over £15.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4957180/Britain-s-ruled-patronising-b-rds-says-QUENTIN-LETTS.html#ixzz4uqBaZlGZ
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

 

6/10/17

 

 

H.F.1338 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT A SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU.

 

 

H.F.730

*  *  *

 

 DAILY MAIL

JUNE 14,2018

 

PUB chain WETHERSPOON

 is to

STOP SELLING WINE AND BEER

FROM

FRANCE and GERMANY

AHEAD OF

BREXIT

It will focus on offering more beverages from the UK and non EU producers across its 880 from JULY 9,2018.

Champagne and German wheat beers will be switched for English sparkling wine and craft beers in the run-up to leaving the EU.

But Kopparberg cider, which is currently made in Sweden, will stay stocked after the Swedish firm said it will switch production to the UK.

JD Wetherspoon chairman Tim Martin said:

'This is the start of a review of all our products in the next six to 24 months, with the object of making our business more competitive.'

He said tariffs imposed by the 'protectionist' EU were keeping prices high for UK consumers.

Some 2million people visit Wetherspoon pubs every week

The group sells more than 6million bottles of Kopparberg and 2million bottles of sparkling wine and prosecco every year, but fewer than 100,000 bottles of champagne are bought at its pubs.

In place of French fizz, the pubs will offer UK sparkling wine brands Denbies and Whitedowns as well as Australian Hardy wines. Meanwhile UK brewed wheat beers Blue Moon,Belguim White, Thornbridge Versa Weisse and mSA Braines Atlantic White will replace German brands such as Erdinger.

Russ Mould, investment director at saving firm AJ Bell, said

'Tim Martin's strong held political views are well known and you have to respect anyone's ability to stick to their principles so firmly.

'Excluding popular brands of drinks based on their country of origin seems an unusual move for a firm which you would think wants to be seen as inclusive and welcoming to customers of all views and beliefs, but Mr Martin knows his customers and has successfully built the firm by providing

VALUE FOR MONEY.

Mr Martin said Brexit would create big marking opportunities for UK and non-EU producers, which the pub group is keen to encourage.

The Wetherspoon chairman added: 'The products we are introducing are at a lower prices than EU products they are replacing.

'We intend to honour existing contracts with EU suppliers some of which have several years to run, but we are starting to make the transition to

NON-EU TRADE

NOW.

 [CHEERS!-MR MARTIN]

*

JUNE 14-2018

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JUNE 14,2018

H F 1573

 
 

 

World's most brutal regimes lavish £280K of hospitality on our MPS

TRIPS TO NATIONS THAT ABUSE HUMAN RIGHTS.
ISRAEL  31 - SAUDI ARABIA 17 - BAHRAIN 16 CHINA 15 - SRI LANKA 2 - EGYPT 2- IRAN 1 -IRAQ 1- OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES 1 - PAKISTAN 1   

 

 News for DAILY MAIL-World's most brutal regimes lavish £280k of hospitality on our MPs

By Daniel Martin-Policy Editor

DOZENS of MPs have accepted hospitality from regimes accused of human rights abuses, the Mail can reveal.

China, Bahrain, Iran and Sri Lanka are among the nations who have poured more than £280,000 into flights and hotels to fund trips for Britain's MPs over the PAST YEAR.

Earlier this year, no fewer than ten MPs travelled to Beijing on a visit part-funded by the Chinese Communist Party - even though China is accused of hundreds of mass executions. Bahrain-another country with an 'appalling' human rights record - funded 16 trips for MPs.

It comes on top of the revelation that MPs had accepted hospitality from Saudi Arabia-accused of murdering journalist Jamal Khashoggi-worth tens of thousands of pounds. In total, no fewer than nine out of 30 countries on the Foreign Office's human rights watch list have funded visits in the past year.

Campaigners condemned any MP who accepted these trips without raising concerns. Allan Hogarth, Amnesty International UK's head of policy and government affairs said: We would like to think that any MP tempted by a trip abroad would ensure that their hosts human rights were above board.

'Some of the countries listed have  appalling human rights records. No parliamentarian should ever go to any country without being prepared to publicly raise human rights issues, and speak up for equality and justice.'

Under parliamentary rules. MPs have to declare the freebies on the register of members interests - official record of financial benefits' which others might reasonably consider to influence his or her actions or words as a Member of Parliament'.

Analysis by the Mail found nine countries on the Foreign Office watch list have paid for MPs hospitality in the year since September 2017.

China has paid for 15 trips totalling £39,743. This is despite the Foreign Office reporting that human rights activists are still being tortured in China, and thousands were executed last year following mass show trials. In April, ten MPs from different parties went on a trip part-funded by the International Liaison Department of China's Communist Party.

The visit was to the UK-China Leadership Forum to engage with Chinese Communist officials' on a broad range of topics and to strengthen UK-China bilateral relations'.

Bahrain-a country accused of stamping down on opposition by shutting down the only independent newspaper-has funded 18 trips, costing £38, 918 in total. Five Tory MPs attended a conference in the capital Manama in December 2017 to 'gain a deeper understanding of the strategic links between the Kingdom of Bahrain and the wider Gulf States and the UK.

Five MPs enjoyed trips courtesy of Sri Lanka in the past year despite the fact that the country is accused of torture, widespread surveillance and harassment, and discrimination against gay people.

In the past year, trips for 17 MPs were funded by Saudi Arabia costing £137,618 in total. Many were as part of a parliamentary delegation to see the impact of ballistic missile strikes in the Saudi/Yemen border region and gain a deeper understanding of the strategic importance of the coalition operations in Yemen'. 

The country has been accused of war crimes in Yemen. One visit was paid for by the government of Iran, which carries out mass executions and detains journalists.

The final entry on the Foreign Office's human rights list is

ISRAEL

and the 

OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES.

A total of 31 trips were funded by the Israeli government which the Foreign Office accepts has been guilty of violations of humanitarian law. One trip was part-funded by the office of the Palestinian president in Ramallah.

[Did you notice that the details of the 31 trips funded by the Israeli government were conspicuous by their absence.]

 

[Those MPs who receive hospitality from brutal regimes or for that matter any other country and speak on its behalf should at that time of speaking wear a visible label reminding other MPs of their visit to that country in the current year. By so doing  ,they might in the matter of brutal governments be more careful of their acceptance in the future. In being invited to countries not listed above it is still a matter of interest to the HOUSE. In fact a recent secret visit by a Minister to Israel led to a resignation. If the MP has publicly brought the human rights issue before the offending country ,or speaks about visits to other countries, then their future comments  , will be clear to all concerned.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 27, 2018

H.F.1740

 

THE SLAVERY PROTESTORS FAIL TO LOOK WITHIN THEIR OWN CULTURE AND HISTORY

*

The slavery protests' guilty secret

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-March 30, 2007]

 

The other celebration this week has been confused. Were we proud that Parliament had backed William Wilberforce's Bill to abolish the shameful slave trade, or were we in a familiar

ON-OUR-KNEES

POSITION

-and apologising for ever being involved in it?

If the latter, then it would have been helpful to hear someone of African descent also apologising for the

FACT

-that SLAVERY continued throughout that continent for decades afterwards, except where colonial governments like Britain managed to suppress it -in face of fierce [African] local opposition.

It might have been helpful, too, if the protesters of African descent had vented some of their spleen on the

ARAB SLAVE TRADERS

-who carried on for so long with their particularly vicious form of

SLAVE TRADING

They systematically

and crudely castrated their victims, which killed the great majority of them

PERHAPS

-the slavery protesters have called on the

ARAB NATIONS

-for a few billions of their oil revenues in

COMPENSATION

BUT IF SO, I FAILED TO NOTICE IT.

*          *          *

A SUMMARY OF THE SLAVE TRADE

 

..From Britain, the largest slave trader and the greatest offender the movement sprang which successfully abolished slavery in the British Isles in 1772, then the slave trade in 1806, then slavery itself in the British Dominions in 1833, and finally so worked on the conscience of the world as to secure a large and nearly universal concurrence of action for the extirpation of the evil.

The credit for securing from Lord Mansfield the famous decision in the case of

JAMES SOMERSET (1772)

-that the status of slavery was unknown to the

COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND

was due to

GRANVILLE SHARP

-a civil servant, inconspicuous in wealth and station, but of a rare warmth of heart and persistence of character, who once fired by the cruel usage of a negro slave in the streets of London, never rested until he had obtained the verdict which for ever afterwards rid the British islands of the taint of slavery.

Thereafter comes a roll of English emancipators whose names even in a general history of Europe are worthy of

COMMEMORATION

-William Wilberforce, Thomas Clarkson, Zachary Macaulay and James Stephen, whose preparatory labours, sustained over a period of twenty years, enabled Charles Fox to carry the

ABOLITION OF THE SLAVE TRADE

Thomas Fowel Buxton, the parliamentary leader of the

ABOLITIONISTS

-who worked up the

HOUSE OF COMMONS

-to abolish slavery; and Lord Brougham, who carried the torch through the country; Lord Palmerston, who stopped the slave trade between

PORTUGAL and BRAZIL

-and the noble group of missionaries, soldiers, and statesmen, David Livingston, Charles Gordon, Sir John Kirk, and Lord Lugard, by whose efforts in large measure

AFRICA

-has been opened up and

RID OF THE CURSE

of the

ARAB SLAVE -RAIDER

Lecky does no more than

JUSTICE

when he states the

THE CRUSADE of ENGLAND

AGAINST SLAVERY

"may probably be regarded as among the three or four perfectly virtuous pages in the history of nations'

[A History of Europe by H.A.L.FISHER -1936]

 

*

 

[Today in March 2007 we have a Government which does not deserve a mention in history as it has had no virtuous events in the past ten years. It will be remembered as a Government not trusted by the people and which has brought a once proud and just nation to kneeling before the  politically correct diverse minority who have not lost any opportunity to degrade the nation which today should not be on its knees but standing with thankfulness that their descendents had showed Christian fellowship with all mankind remembering the words dedicated above to the many who saw an injustice and abolished a vile trade which at the time was responded too because of our standing and reputation in the corridors of power throughout the world.]

What is unforgivable that an opportunity to honour an 18th and 19th century of a

BAND of BROTHERS

-had been lost because a people who once had confidence and pride in their country and have lost their way and  have become the 'silent people' because they are afraid (they think) to offend.

Our minority cultures have all been taught that they can be a part of our country but not of it. They can demand their voice is heard but not that of the majority who are of this country. this pattern was launched by

MULTICULTURALISM

-which has now been discredited -as it has done immense harm to community relations in our country.

IT IS TIME FOR OUR MINORITIES TO FORGET THEIR ENCOURAGED DIFFERENCES AND IN FUTURE TO BE AS WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN IN THE PAST

ALL ONE

Whoever you are and from wherever you have come.

 

LET US ALL BE

A

 

BAND OF BROTHERS AND SISTERS

AND

NOT LOOK FOR OUR DIFFERENCES.

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

[Daily Mail-March 30, 2007]

 

*

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

SEPTEMBER 28-2016

 

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Happy New Year: Hundreds of top Khazarian mobsters, including the Bush family, renditioned to Gitmo

 

In a historic moment of poetic justice, most of the U.S.-based top perpetrators of the fake “war on terror” have now themselves been renditioned to the U.S. Navy camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Pentagon sources say.  “The Rothschild assets George Soros, Peter Munk, Peter Sutherland, the Bushes, the Podestas, and many others may have been airlifted to Gitmo for military tribunals, as the Department of Defense spends $500M to upgrade the prison and send more military police and Marines,” the sources say.

In one of many signs of just how historic the new American revolution is, “30 congressmen will not be returning in the new year,” the Pentagon sources say.  CIA sources also confirm that former U.S. President Bill Clinton, hoping for a plea bargain, is spilling the beans on people like former CIA head John Brennan, top U.S. Mossad agent Rahm Emmanuel, former Vice President Dick Cheney, and many others.

Furthemore, as U.S. President Donald Trump proclaims Janaury 2018 to be “Anti-Slavery Month,”
 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-proclaims-january-2018-national-slavery-human-trafficking-prevention-month/

… human trafficking centers around the world are being raided and shut down.  In Saudi Arabia, 3,000 child sex slaves have been freed, according to Russian FSB sources.  In the U.S., “there was a power outage on December 27th at the “pedo heaven Disneyland,” as the place was raided by special forces fighting human slavers, the Pentagon sources say.  In apparently connected events, Washington Post heir Bill Graham and Jordan Feldstein, the brother of the actor Jonah Hill, died last week, the sources point out.

Another move was that Julian Assange “was extracted from the Ecuadorian Embassy to take down the cabal, and he may be pardoned along with Mike Flynn,” the sources add.

Also, “On Christmas day, Delta Force raided a mansion owned by former President Barack Obama in …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Merry Christmas:  The 13 “Illuminati” bloodline families sue for peace

Peace on earth and goodwill to all (and not just men, but all life forms) is looking like a realistic goal for 2018 now that the 13 “Illuminati” * bloodline families, seeing their ancient rule of planet Earth collapsing, are suing for peace.  Last week a representative of the G7 (Germany, the U.K., the corporate U.S., Japan, Italy, France, and Canada) met with a representative of the White Dragon Society (WDS) to discuss peace terms, according to a WDS member who was present at the meeting.  The G7, of course, is the political front for the 13 bloodline families.  There can be no doubt that this meeting was made possible by people inside the military-industrial complex acting in the spirit of Jesus Christ, and for this we wish them all “a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.”

The bloodline offer to negotiate peace is directly connected to the state of emergency that was declared last week by USA President Donald Trump.  If you have not seen it yet, please read the historic document in the link below.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-congress-united-states-6/

“After Hanukkah, Trump declared a state of emergency and signed an executive order on December 20th freezing the assets of those accused of human rights abuses and corruption, a catch-all to bankrupt the Bushes, Clintons, Soros, Obama, the Cabal, and the global Jewish mafia,” was how a Pentagon source summed up the situation.

“The national emergency allows Trump to seize assets and unleash the military to carry out mass arrests and adjudicate via military tribunals, effectively imposing martial law,” the source continues.

The Pentagon source also sent a copy of this photograph with the explanation, “Trump wears purple when unveiling his national security strategy on December 18th in a victory lap over the Soros/Hillary purple revolution, and drinks water with both hands to simulate handcuffs.”

Clearly reacting to this situation, the representative of the bloodlines set the meeting for December 23rd, the birthday of the Japanese Emperor, and claimed to be a representative of the Imperial family as well as the G7.  The representative, who acted as if he was negotiating a surrender, said the bloodlines want to keep existing nation-states and institutions as they are, but…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Letter to the Editor – Experimental Quantum Anti-Gravity Successfully Replicated

 

I would like to let you know that my anti-gravity experiments have been successfully replicated by the Aerospace Engineering Department at the New Sciences & Technologies Faculty of the University of Tehran in the Islamic Republic of Iran. I have developed complete quantum anti-gravity hypothesis with direct testable predictions that are simple, clear, easy, and inexpensive.

As you know, present-day quantum gravity theories suffer from too many mathematical space dimensions, and from too few conclusive experimental results.

My hypothesis is simple, clear, and subject to easy empirical verification.  I offer clear explanation of the principles of quantum gravity, and also precisely describe how to perform simple and inexpensive experiments to verify it.

In order to clearly understand quantum anti-gravity, please follow these 8 steps:

  1. Start from this brief overview — Quantum Gravity in a Nutshell
  2. The theoretical basis for quantum gravity are the Abraham’s equations of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy, and their empirical counterpart — the Abraham force
  3. To understand how the Biefeld-Brown effect works, you need to be clear where B-B vectors point — “up” or “down”
  4. The Biefeld-Brown effect is an instance of the Abraham force.
  5. Study the section about gyroscope’s anomalous effect.
  6. Please, study all the material on THE BOYD BUSHMAN EFFECT page in order to appreciate the potential complex magnetic fields have for shaping quantum gravity interactions.
  7. Now, you are ready to read the short introduction to quantum gravity.
  8. Perform two simple experiments for empirical verification.

The following are the 10 “mysteries” that my hypothesis sheds new light upon:

  1. The main prediction of my hypothesis (2016) is that anti-hydrogen will anti-gravitate.
  2. Gravitational waves mystery.
  3. EmDrive mystery.
  4. Solar mystery.
  5. Mass mystery.
  6. Bicycle mystery.
  7. Propeller  mystery.
  8. Cloud mystery.
  9. Pioneer mystery.
  10. Missing mystery.

I have designed 4 progressively more complex experiments, and we have successfully performed one of them, the one of medium difficulty, which constitutes:

The empirical discovery of hitherto unknown physical interaction between angular momentum of a spinning gyroscope and Earth’s magnetic and electric fields.

To perform this experiment, we need a gyroscope with a vertical support, and magnetic and electric shielding cages.

According to my hypothesis, there will be a measurable time difference between a freely spinning gyroscope inside, and outside the cages.  A gyroscope freely spinning inside both cages will come to rest in less time than when spinning outside them.

The experiment was performed successfully and was recorded in the following two videos:

To have a clear idea what is involved in the experiment, please take a closer look at the above two videos first.

For the experiment, we used the following small and light gyroscope at 10,000 rpm:

It would be much better to use a heavier gyro, because the heavier the gyro, the stronger the effect, at the same rate of rpm.

The value of angular velocity (rpm) is important only insofar as to generate sufficient angular momentum to allow the gyro to spin freely for a longer time before it comes to rest.

The objective of the experiment was to obtain two values of the gyro’s run time:

  • Outside the shielding;
  • Inside the shielding.

In my experiment, the two sample values are, respectively:

  • 55.54 seconds
  • 51.87 seconds

There was a 3.67 second difference, which amounts to 6.6%.  The time difference is directly proportional to the quality and quantity of electrostatic shielding of the Faraday cage. Applying the magnetic shielding in addition to the electric one would further increase the time difference.

As you can see in the video, it is important that the gyro is elevated by means of a vertical support.  Ideally, gyro should start spinning as close to a vertical position as possible, and also be able to pass lower, while still spinning, than its horizontal position.

The reason for this effect is that the gyroscope inside the cages will be spinning in reduced strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, which in turn reduces the strength of the Biefeld-Brown effect acting upon it.

The gyroscope outside the cages, spinning in the undiminished strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, is subject to the full influence of the Biefeld-Brown effect that causes the gyroscope to resist Earth’s gravity pull, which happens to be none other than pure natural antigravity effect.

OBJECTIONS

  • All conductors, like the brass gyro, exhibit an effective diamagnetism when they experience a changing magnetic field.  The Lorentz force on electrons causes them to circulate around forming eddy currents.  The eddy currents then produce an induced magnetic field that opposes the applied field and resist the conductor’s motion.

—  That is true for both, the gyro spinning inside and outside the Faraday cage in Earth’s magnetic field.  It does not make any difference.

  • But the gyro’s induced magnetic field will generate eddy currents in the Faraday cage and the resultant magnetic field will slow down gyro’s spin (magnetic breaking), and hence the whole effect.  It is like dropping a magnet down a copper pipe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dFFL8TDt2Q

—   The analogy in the video applies, but only in principle.  Spinning brass gyro is not a strong neodymium magnet, and if, in principle, it generates any magnetic field, it is so weak that it will not even affect a needle of a compass.  As opposed to the copper pipe in the video, the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage has much larger diameter (the inverse-square law), so it is enough to drop a strong neodymium magnet down the Faraday cage to see how much it would slow down, if at all.  As you can see in the above video, even few empty slits in the copper pipe greatly weaken the eddy currents, this being the reason for using enamel-coated copper mesh.  Diamagnetic materials, like brass, or copper, have a relative magnetic permeability that is less than or equal to 1, and therefore a magnetic susceptibility less than or equal to 0, since susceptibility is defined as χv=μv−1.  This means that diamagnetic materials, in principle, are repelled by magnetic fields.  However, since diamagnetism is such a weak property, its effects are not observable in everyday life.  Moreover, there is a big difference between Faraday cage made of solid copper, and one made of enamel-coated copper mesh.  The magnetic field induced in the gyro is weak, because Earth’s magnetic field is weak, so whatever little eddy currents could be induced by the gyro in solid copper Faraday cage will become irrelevant in the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage, as you can see in the following two videos:

Even though it is true that the experiment, in principle, is open to influences from various phenomena, including the Carnegie curve, the overall result is clearly well beyond being attributed exclusively to these other phenomena.

To completely eliminate above objections, magnetic shielding needs to be applied in addition to the Faraday cage, and the gyro should be custom-made from a material which does not allow for eddy currents to flow in it.

Naturally,  I will be happy to answer any questions that you may have for me regarding the theoretical foundations as well as replication of the experiment.

With respect and much gratitude,  I am
Sincerely yours,

U.S. troops deploy worldwide with 10,000 sealed indictments to take down Khazarian mob

U.S. President Donald Trump spent the weekend at Camp David with his top generals to map out the exact strategy for decapitating the Khazarian mafia worldwide, say Pentagon sources.  “The Atlanta airport was shut down, while the Department of Defense refused to disclose the locations of 44,000 U.S. troops who may be involved in terminating the cabal worldwide,” a senior Pentagon source said.  There are now close to 10,000 sealed indictments as more and more of the Khazarian criminals give up evidence on their colleagues, the sources say.

There are also many extra-judicial killings going on.  “The liberal sanctuary city mayor of San Francisco, Edwin Lee, dropped dead after an illegal alien was found not guilty in the murder of Kate Steinle even after his confession,” one source notes.  “Lee’s death is a message to the Democrats and sanctuary city mayors like Rahm Emmanuel of Chicago and Bill De Blasio of New York City,” the source warns.

The Khazarian mob is also killing off lots of people.  In Japan, two former executives of Toshiba, Atsutoshi Nishida and Taizo Nishimura, suddenly died in the past two months because they were about to provide evidence about the March 11, 2011 Fukushima tsunami and nuclear terror attack against Japan, according to sources close to the royal family.

This attack was carried out by henchmen of the Rockefeller family, whose members include Hillary and Bill Clinton, the sources say.  The Rockellers, in turn, were taking orders from the fascist P2 Freemason lodge, they say.  The Rockefeller family, by the way, has elected Mel Rockefeller, the son of Nelson Rockefeller, as the new family head, these sources added.

In Canada, Barry Sherman, owner of the Canadian pharmaceutical giant Apotex, was found hanging dead alongside his wife Honey by the family’s indoor pool.  According to CIA sources, Sherman was …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

H.F.1430

 

 
 
 

 

 A GIANT PONZI SCHEME THAT DESERVED TO GO TO THE WALL

...even though Carillions collapse

 shames CAPITALISM

and puts the wind in Labour's sails says ALEX BRUMMER

 

News for DAILY MAIL-A GIANT PONZI SCHEME THAT DESERVED TO GO TO THE WALL by ALEX BRUMMER

 

ALEX BRUMMER: A giant Ponzi scheme that deserved to go to the wall... even though Carillion's collapse shames capitalism and puts the wind in Labour's sails



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5273135/ALEX-BRUMMER-Carillion-deserved-wall.html#ixzz54RK5sa9n
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The collapse of the Wolverhampton -based construction group Carillion is catastrophic for its 43,000 employees at home and overseas, for the Government and for members of the stricken pension fund.

It represents a nadir for the private sector outsourcing companies which, since the era of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, have been relied upon to deliver all manner of public services, from building hospitals and schools to modernising the NHS and even providing school meals.

In the fierce scramble for business among these behemoths, Carillion was so desperate for contracts that it consistently overpromised on the work it could do for an agreed cost. When it failed to deliver on time and on price, as was the case with the new 646-bed Royal Liverpool hospital, the group went on a borrowing spree.

 

More than 20,000 jobs in the UK, and more overseas, are at risk after Carillion ran out of time to find a way to restructure its £1.5bn debt burden. Pictured: A staff member outside an office in London

Its debts grew to £900 million, an impossibly large sum to manage when its share price was going into freefall during the course of last year.

Plunge

In effect Carillion, chaired by former water company boss Philip Green, had become a mammoth Ponzi scheme in which the cash promised or received for newer contracts was effectively being used to cover up the black holes on the older contracts.

Why Carillion has careered into crisis 

The Wolverhampton-based firm, the backbone behind a raft of public infrastructure projects, is teetering over a precipice.

The company is the second largest construction firm in the UK but has debts of about £1.5billion and a pension fund shortfall of almost £600million. 

So how has it got into this mess? Most analysts agree that the answer is simple. It has over-reached itself.

Carillion they argue has its fingers in too many pies at homes and abroad from the Battersea Power station redevelopment in the UK to operations in Canada, the Middle East and the Caribbean.

The company's incessant desire to expand has resulted in it pursuing too many risky contracts - some accompanied by questionable accounting practices - that have become increasingly unprofitable. 

It has furthermore faced delays in payments in the Middle East.

The firm in recent months has found  it much harder to manage its mountainous debt pile and pension deficit.

In December Carillion managed to persuade lenders to give it more time to repay them. But the company's banks are now understood to be unwilling to lend it any more cash.

What is unconscionable in all this is that over the past two decades, before its troubles emerged, Carillion paid out vast sums in dividends to shareholders (seeking to keep them sweet) and bonuses to fat-cat directors — including former chief executive Richard Howson, dismissed last July — yet allowed the pension fund deficit to balloon to an officially estimated £900 million.

The burden of sorting this out will now fall squarely on bail-out body the Pension Protection Fund, which is financed by raising a levy on the functioning pension schemes into which millions of us contribute.

Among the more astonishing aspects of the scandal is that even as Carillion’s share price plunged in the second half of last year, Transport Secretary Chris Grayling, as well as other ministers and civil servants, still felt it was safe to gift the firm new contracts. City investors and hedge funders had already recognised that the company was struggling for survival and could no longer pay its thousands of suppliers in good time. If ever there was a case of the Government throwing good money after bad, this was it.

The business-friendly Tory Government, deliberately or naively, awarded Carillion three new contracts within days of the company admitting several major projects had gone wrong to the tune of £800 million — an announcement that provoked a 30 per cent plunge in the group’s shares last July.

A week after that first public warning that it was all going to hell in a handcart, Grayling’s department revealed that Carillion would partner another construction group on a £1.4 billion contract to work on the flagship £56 billion HS2 railway project.

Days later, Carillion was told by the Ministry of Defence it had been chosen to provide ‘catering, retail and leisure’ services for 233 military facilities. These contracts provided some temporary relief for the firm’s books.

But confidence in Carillon’s ability to manage the crisis, in spite of the new contracts, was fading fast, and in September it warned again that profits would fall short of expectations.

Yet the Government still gambled that it was a good bet, and awarded it a key infrastructure project to electrify the railway connecting Corby in Northamptonshire with London.

Ironically, the contracts for these large-scale, taxpayer-funded projects were given out at a time when Carillion’s chief executive and finance director were departing, and the share price was tanking. Yet Whitehall, in their naivety, sailed serenely on.

The collapse of Carillion comes hard on the heels of the decision by Virgin Trains and its partner Stagecoach to hand back the East Coast railway service to the Government, at a potential taxpayer cost of £2 billion. These two disasters have not only left the Government looking very silly, but also given a fillip to those supporters of Jeremy Corbyn on the Left who are convinced capitalism is wicked, and that only re-nationalisation of public services is the answer.

 

Carillion workers lined up outside a staff office to check on the status of their jobs in London yesterday morning

Sure enough, Shadow Cabinet Office minister Jon Trickett has been quick to exploit the misfortunes of Carillion’s workforce and pensioners, asking what ‘due diligence measures were undertaken before awarding contracts worth billions of taxpayer money’.

Failure

What he failed to acknowledge is that the most enthusiastic embrace of private outsourcing companies came during the last Labour government, which used firms such as Carillion to replace Britain’s Victorian hospitals, to build modern schools, expand universities and begin the process of updating the nation’s railways and roads.

Much went wrong at Carillion, including the failure of highly paid auditors KPMG to lay bare the company’s parlous financial state.

But then independent directors and major investors failed to question a record dividend payout to investors of nearly £80 million in 2016, even as the company headed for the rocks and the huge shortfall in the pension fund grew ever larger. (Labour MP Frank Field, who chairs the Pensions Select Committee, castigated Carillion for taking on ‘mega borrowings while its pension deficit ballooned’.)

None of these attacks can be very comfortable for Baroness (Sally) Morgan, former political secretary to Tony Blair, who joined the Carillion board as an independent director in June 2017, shortly before the fateful disclosure to the stock market that the company was in deep trouble.

The collapse of Carillion also shines a light on the wider outsourcing industry, and the ability of huge private firms to be responsible capitalists when they are given hundreds of millions in public money.

Other companies including Serco, Mitie, Balfour Beatty and G4S have all experienced difficulties with Government contracts: there has been a tendency for them to take on too much and become financially over-stretched.

Stupidity

With the help of experts in company turnarounds, some have managed to clean up the contracts under their management and bounce back.

But it’s too late for Carillion, which ran its affairs in a helter-skelter, irresponsible manner, yet still managed to keep the Government on side until the very end. Some have questioned why the Tories chose not to bail the firm out in the way it seems to have done with the train companies running the East Coast line.

But that surely would have sparked public fury — after all, if capitalism is to survive and thrive as Britain’s chosen economic model then weakness or stupidity must not be allowed to flourish.

Of course, Carillion’s collapse is a dreadful blow, and even now it will prove expensive for taxpayers, who will have to fund the company’s most vital operations until the insolvency practitioners can sell on the contracts.

But it would be a serious misjudgment if this debacle were used as an excuse for bringing an end to the role of private enterprise in building more efficient public services.

Enterprise and ambition in business have been the lifeblood of Britain for centuries. What a shame that it took the collapse of Carillion to remind us how it should not be done.

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.1439

 
 

 

 

 

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[ A MATTER OF FACT!]

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV

-17

DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-

18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-

19

AUG-19

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 As Marx said, history does have the ... A Very British Coup revolved around a conspiracy by the military, the media, big business and M15...

 

 

So this is what a very British coup looks like.

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

SOME of you will recall the novel

A Very British Coup,

subsequently made into an award-winning television series on Channel 4.

It was written by Labour MP Chris Mullin, published in 1982, and revolved around a conspiracy by the

MILITARY-THE MEDIA-BIG BUSINESS-M15

to bring down a Left-wing government.

At the time, the plot was entirely credible, since Britain was riven by strikes and revolution was in the air. I read the book as a young labour and industrial correspondent, and it made sense to me.

 The Bennites were in the ascendancy, Margaret Thatcher was horribly unpopular and it looked as if the wizened Hampstead Leftie Michael Foot-Worzel Gummidge, as Private Eye dubbed him-would be our next Prime Minister.

Mullin's assumptions were based  on hard fact. In the Seventies there had been well-founded reports about the Establishment plot to depose Labour's Harold Wilson.

In some quarters, there were even rumblings of a military coup.

A couple of years ago, when the un reconstructed Bennite Jeremy Corbyn became leader, Mullen talked about writing a sequel. He imagined the Funny  People orchestrating a putsch to thwart a democratically elected Corbyn government.

Trouble is, history has a habit of not working out as you expect. Although, as Marx said, history does have the capacity to repeat itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. That's where we are right now. Except tragedy and farce are running in tandem.

WE are in the middle of

A VERY BRITISH COUP

but not as Mullin predicted. What we're seeing is an elaborate, well-financed and coordinated plot to overturn as extreme Left-wing Prime Minister

BUT

the democratically expressed will of the British people.

It's being mounted by the Government of the day, aided and abetted by Big Business and the Civil Service.

[A repeat of 1970's-again by a supposed Conservative Government.]

 

THIS is A  Very BRITISH Coup, only written by Lewis Carroll not Chris Mullin. In our new Looking Glass World, words mean-as Humpty Dumpty declared-whatever they want them to mean.

Thus the dwindling band of MPs sticking uo for the

17.4 MILLION who voted

LEAVE

are condemned as plotters and rebels

Those, including Theresa May, who are doing everything in their power to

PREVENT

BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU

and becoming once again a

PROUD SOVEREIGN NATION

are hailed absurdedly as true patriots

As I've said often enough, just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

About the only thing upon which I've ever agreed with Ken Livingstone - apart from cheap Tube fares - was when he wrote a book called

If Voting Changed Anything They'd Abolish it. The Establishment seems hell-bent on proving him

Right over Brexit .

[The EDP has over decades seen much evidence of this very fact and though continually bringing evidence to the surface nobody appears to be interested whether it is lack of Bobbies -on-the beat - Health Service in crisis-Pot-holes-closed Police Stations...Britons on worst State Pensions in the Europe-even Portugal is marginally more. And a bloated -wasteful and grotesque so-called FOREIGN AID which even some regimes as recipients have requested to be stopped .

I told  you the day after the referendum that the fix was already in . Now they're on the final furlongs

We're being informed, in no uncertain fashion that

OUR VOTES ARE WORTHLESS

that they don't count.

WE'RE TOO IGNORANT, TOO UNEDUCATED, TOO RACIST

To be taken seriously.

Politicians who try to square the circle are vilified.

One minute Dominic Raab, who attempted to make a go of being Brexit Secretary, is a principled pragmatic operator of the highest praise.

The next, when he is forced to resign because Mother Theresa has deliberately undermined his position and then lied about it, he's dismissed as a disloyal traitor. And If I hear anyone else demanding a second

'People's Vote'

I'll scream.

All they want to do is reverse the referendum result or give us three options so they can split the

LEAVE VOTE

To be honest, I can't take much more of this patronising guff. The Beeb's idea of discerning commentators these days seems to extend no further than 'Baroness' Shameless Chuckabutty, Potty Toynbee and Mad Alastair Campbell, the author of the dodgy dossier which took into an

ILLEGAL WAR IN IRAQ.

 

As I believe I may have observed before. Campbell is the only bloke I know with a certificate to prove he's sane.

And don't get me started on the CBI which throughout my career has been wrong about everything from joining the euro to the Thatcher reforms. The CBI speaks only for monopolistic, multinational megacorps, not the small-to-medium businesses which are the backbone of our economy and always get the rough end  of the pineapple from Brussels - even though they don't sell so much as a brass washer outside British borders.

Twenty-five-odd years ago, covering a CBI conference in Glasgow, I watched the chairman of Dunlop taking the stage wearing a kilt and waving a Union Jack, as part of an I'm Backing Britain campaign. The following week he sold the company to the Japanese.

These are the same people bnow claiming to have British interests at the heart of their determination to

KEEP US SHACKLED TO THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC EU

The final straw came when the arrogant Amber Rudd was restored to Government over the weekend and immediately demanded loyalty and unity around Mrs May's 'deal'.  Her commitment to 'loyalty' hasn't stopped her trashing Cabinet colleagues in the past.

This fanatically pro-EU women who oozes an inter-galactic sense of  entitledment from every pore, is the sister of the PR spiv Roland Rudd, who is paid a small fortune to run

PROJECT FEAR

on behalf of his well-healed clients.

Just imagine if one of Boris's siblings was cashing in on

BREXIT.

The calls from Remainers for the police to investigate would be deafening. By Sunday, I'd had enough and reached the point where I came over all Tom Robinson.

I've given up reading the papers,

I've given up watching TV.

 

LOOK, I repeat, for those of you who missed it the first time round, even tungsten-tipped hard Brexiteers like me accept there will have to be some concessions if we're going to escape from the EU straitjacket.

And I do think the prospect of a Marxist Corbynista government is too horrible to contemplate.

But I also believe its 1992 all over again. This is Mother Theresa's

BLACK WEDNESDAY

MOMENT

WHATEVER HAPPENS NEXT

THE TORIES

ARE SHOT TO PIECES.

All trust and confidence in them has drained away and we're looking at a Labour government by default whenever the next election is called

Most of the 17.4 million who believe they have been betrayed will simply stay at home, or drift back to Labour. Democracy will be the ultimate casualty of this shabby debacle.

The pathetic defeatest dog's breakfast of an agreement

 which Mother Theresa is trying to force down our throats isn't worthy of the description 'deal'.

It is a monstrous capitulation and will be etched on her political gravestone, even if she does manage to get it, or a version thereof, through Parliament.

Where do we go from here?

I haven't a clue.

But at least we now know exactly

what a

Very British Coup

LOOKS LIKE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 20,2018

H.F.1747

 

News for DAILY MAIL-UK pays worst state pension in the developed world

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension in the developed world with a basic payout of £122.30 a week

  • The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West 
  • Former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get worse 
  • Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found.

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings – and last night former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get even worse.

Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70, while future payments could be cut even further to avoid needing massive hikes in national insurance, Baroness Altmann said.

 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found

The league table revealing Britain's pension shame was compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which analyses the world's industrialised nations. 

Out of all the countries compared, Britain comes bottom – even behind poorer nations such as Chile, Poland and Mexico.

While the UK's state pension is worth just 29 per cent of average earnings, in France the equivalent figure is 74.5 per cent. 

Germany's state pension is worth 50.5 per cent of average earnings, while in the USA it is 49.1 per cent. 

The most generous state pension in the world is in the Netherlands, where the payments are slightly higher than average earnings.

 

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings. File photo

Baroness Altmann warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it. 

She said: 'We are one of the world's leading economies, but our support for the oldest in society is not fit for purpose.

'In April 2016, major reforms to the UK state pension were supposed to have made the system affordable for the future, reducing its generosity. Beyond the 2030s, the new state pension will be lower than the old system for most people and the lowest paid, predominantly women, will lose significantly from the new system.

'Despite this, the Government has been advised that the costs of paying state pensions will soar so much over the next 20 years and beyond that further cuts could be required.'

From later this year the state pension age for women will rise from 63 to match men at 65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.

Baroness Ros Altmann (pictured) warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it

The Government's economic forecasters, the Actuary's Department, believes it will become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the 2060s.

This would mean that anyone aged 30 or below now will not get their state pension until they are 70, while those under 20 will have to wait until they are 71.

Baroness Altmann added: 'The Government actuary believes that just funding the UK's exceptionally low state pension will require reducing payments in future or dramatic tax rises. Policymakers face difficult decisions and are also likely to need to increase the state pension age further.'

The former pensions minister called on the Government to do more to address the crisis, including making private pensions more attractive so that more people are willing to pay a portion of their wages into their own fund.

'To avoid burdening younger generations with significant tax rises, it is vital that more is done to boost private pension saving,' she added. 'Auto-enrolment is a good start, but the pensions industry needs to attract more customers to pay more into their pensions.' 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5379521/Britain-pays-retirees-worst-state-pension.html#ixzz56thYQdgc
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[IT IS IRONIC THAT IT WAS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHICH INTRODUCED THE STATE PENSION  OVER A HUNDRED YEARS AGO BY WINSTON CHURCHILL YET AS SHOWN ABOVE IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY BOTH THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES TO THE PRESENT LEVEL AS THE POOREST PENSIONERS OF THE 24 DEVELOPED NATIONS WITH A PERCENTAGE OF THE AVERAGE WAGE OF 29PER CENT-WHEREAS THE TOP NATION NETHERLANDS PAYS 100.6 %. WITH THE CITY MILE BEING BAILED OUT WITH 45 BILLION OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY.]

-A GREEDY SQUARE MILE AND PARSIMONIOUS STATE PENSION YET OUR OVERSEAS AID IS SQUANDERED AND WASTED WITH THE CHARITIES IN THE MAIN GAUGING THEMSELVES WITH HIGH LIVING-AND NOW WE HEAR EVEN PROSTITUTION IS CONSIDERED A PERK OF THE JOB.  THERE APPEARS NO ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT OF CHARITIES TO ENSURE THAT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE FOR THE TRUE NEEDY NOT FOR FUN AND GAMES AND TERRORISTS OR HIGH LIVING OF THOSE RECEIVING THE TAXPAYERS HARD EARNED REMUNERATION WHILE MANY OF THE CONTRIBUTORS ARE IN GREAT PAIN AND MANY DYING WHICH COULD BE GREATLY REDUCED IF CHARITY BEGAN AT HOME.  TO BOAST OF BEING THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO OVERSEAS AID WHILE A GREAT NUMBER OF OUR CITIZENS PARTICULARLY THE POOR AND A NUMBER OF THE ELDERLY  ARE SUFFERING IN ORDER THAT THE TOP OF THE FOREIGN AID LIST IS MAINTAINED.

HOW IS IT THAT THE OTHER 23 NATIONS CAN PROVIDE A HIGHER STATE PENSION? WHAT IS PREVENTING WESTMINSTER FROM BRINGING OUR STATE PENSION UP TO AT LEAST THE AVERAGE OF THOSE ON THE LIST BELOW WHICH CONTAINS MANY NATIONS WHICH CAN HARDLY BE  CONSIDERED RICH COMPARED TO THE UK. IS IT THAT IN THOSE COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE ARE

 PUT FIRST! - NOT LAST?

THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE FEEDING OFF THE PUBLIC PURSE WITH THEIR OBSCENE RATES OF SALARY AND GOLDEN PENSION-POSSIBLY SO LONG AS THEY ARE COMFORTABLE THEY HAVE NO THOUGHT FOR THOSE WHO PAID FOR THEIR LAVISH LIFESTYLE?

PAYOUT AS PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE WAGE
Netherlands   -  100.6%

Portugal        -   94.9%

Italy             -  93.2%

Austria         -  91.8%

Spain             -  81.8%

Denmark        -  80.2%

France            -  74.5%

Belgium          -  66.1%

Finland         -  65%

Czech Republic-60%

Sweden         -  54.9%

Canada          -  53.4%

OECD average=62.9

 

Germany    -    50.5%

USA            -    49.1%

Norway      -    48.8%

Switzerland    -    44.9%

New Zealand   -  43.2%

Australia     -    42.6%

Ireland        -   42.3%

Chile         -     40.1%

Japan           -  40%

Poland       -      38.6%

Mexico         -     29.6%

UK  -  29%

Source-OECD

*

LATEST!

ON THE CONTINUING GROWTH OF THE GROTESQUE AND WASTEFUL VANITY PROJECT

FOREIGN AID BUDGET

DAILY MAIL

OCTOBER 30, 2018

Foreign Aid will top £14bn a year
 

Britain's foreign Aid budget will soar by £230million next year, taking it above£14billion for the first time

The UK is committed to spend 0.7per cent of its national income on aid.

Britain is one of only seven countries in the world to meet the target.

The foreign aid budget soared by £555million to a record £13.9billion last year. Our aid budget has more than doubled from the £6.4billion spent in 2008 and more than quadrupled from the £3.3billion doled out in 2002.

[Why with such vast sums to alleviate the distress around the world are we still seeing adverts on our television screens for such a basic-common and vital need as drinking water?]

 

With billions spread abroad like confetti why are UK state pensions not up with the best in Europe. With a strongly extreme Left Labour Party we would have expected them to have this at the top of their agenda-If it is-they are keeping it a SECRET!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 30, 2018

 

H.F.1716

 

 

Extra £11billion

Phil COULD have given US

That's the amount

experts say we overspend on foreign aid-the

 Budget so Bloated

the Government has had to

 LIE

about its

RESULTS

*

News for DAILY MAIL EXTRA £11 billion Phil COULD have given US by Ian Birrell

OCTOBER 31-2018

 

FRANKLY, it was one of the most patronising lines heard in a Budget speech for an the a long time.

Philip Hammond admitting classroom finances were stretched declared he was announcing a £400 million bonus 'to help our schools buy the little extras the need'.

In one glib Budget phrase, the Chancellor managed to infuriate an influential chunk of the electorate while underlining the hollowness of talk on ending austerity.

[While reading this account of the Chancellor's speach one should remember that the Prime Minister Theresa May would be aware of its content and therefore we would expect in agreeance with its message. The need for more police on the beat and prisons is being ignored with so many criminals unable to join their friends in the drug supplied holiday camp atmosphere now common place in our so-called corrective system.

When schools are begging parents to help fund computers and textbooks, this was barely enough to give pupils a new set of pencils-and less than Hammond gave councils to fill in a few pot holes.

Meanwhile, crime is rising, cities are becoming more violent, MPs are pressing for more cash to help protect

PUBLIC SAFETY.

yet hard-pressed police received received

NOTHING

beyond £160 million for those fighting terrorism.

Prisons are in terrible crisis-yet the justice department budget is being cut, Social care is crumbling-yet services were given about one-third the amount they need just to cope with existing demand in an ageing and rising population.

Surge

But one slab of spending grew substantially bigger as always- the sums frittered away on

FOREIGN AID

which continued their inexorable surge with an extra £230million set to be sprayed around the world next year.

So the total given away by Britain will top

£14 BILLION

-enough to fund

2,168 nurses

for every English  hospital trust

90 teachers

for for every secondary school or to build enough social housing for a new city the size of

LIVERPOOL...

TO BE CONTINUED

Absurd

Many MPs know the great British aid giveaway is crazy and that the arguments for aid contain more holes than a colander. They can see how most rival nations simply ignore the flawed United Nations-set 0.7 per cent GDP target

Even before Trump, the US was giving less athan0.2per cent. None of the other major economies in the G7-Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan-are hitting the UN target that prioritises spending over need. It is absurd that Britain doled out nearly £1 for every £6 spent on aid by these wealthiest nations.

One former foreign office minister told me the real level of British aid based on need and effective spending should be 'at most

'£3BILLION.

Just think how another £11BILLION could help the

POLICE

SCHOOLS

or the

SOCIAL CARE SYSTEM.

Instead the Government has decided British schools can struggle because they must keep on offering 'little extras' for

 CORRUPT DICTATORS.

CONFERENCE ORGANISERS

and

FAT-CAT CHARITY CHIEFS.

[REMEMBER! THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY IS JUDGED ON ITS ACTIONS AND WHEN ONE SEES HOW MATTERS LIKE THE BLOATED AND WASTEFUL FOREIGN AID AND THE NEED OF 'BOBBIES ON THE BEAT' AND MORE PRISONS ARE IGNORED THEN ONE CANNOT EXPECT SUCH AN EQUALLY IMPORTANT ISSUE SUCH AS BREXIT  TO BE HANDLED EFFECTIVELY AND EXPEDITIOUSLY -WHICH IS WHAT HAS HAPPENED AT THE PRESENT TIME.]

 

FULL ARTICLE

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

OCTOBER 31-2018

H.F.1741

 

[ A MATTER OF FACT!]

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

*  *  *

ADDED DECEMBER,2018

[FIND OUT MORE OF YOUR WORLD THAT WILL SHOCK

YOU.]

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

 

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 5-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 6-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-PAGE 2-2019

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012