MAR FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018 -(1994 -Official Website -M AR.PT 1-2018 )-MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 5-2018

          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

History is the best cultivator of true Patriotism

 

 Over 20 centuries of the Christian Era  is behind us and further back other eras. We draw on the accumulated experience of those centuries.

 

'This I think is true of History. It enables us to regard modern problems with eyes that look backward as well as forward. This is how many would-be reformers and so-called politicians go hopelessly wrong. They don't know History. [You all know who we have in mind in 2006]

 

They launch out into schemes, build up fine theories, institute far-reaching measures, which, had they but studied the annals of other ages, they would know to be futile or dangerous, because they ran counter to human nature of economic history, or a nation's inherited character.

'History is the best cultivator of true patriotism for if we read the long struggles by which their rights when we realize that the liberties we now enjoy [only just in 2006] and perhaps prize too lightly, [As is an English characteristic  which is being aroused  December 2006], cost the blood of heroes and martyrs; when we remember the brave deeds done on British soil, the great hearts that have beat in our country's cause, the noble men and women who have lived and walked to make the British man glorious -we feel pride of race that has no meanness, and  if we have a spark of native fire, we shall make a secret resolution, not to let that name be dragged into the dirt of infamy.

And History will temper this patriotism with a restraining influence, bidding us reverence the traditions of other nations, teaching us that patriotism should not be narrowing and insular. but shall go hand in hand with the world-wide fellowship of common charity, not judging every nation by our own standard, nor thinking that because a thing is British it is right, because it is foreign it is wrong but rather giving us the desire to learn and profit from all that is best among other people in other lands, and to stamp out all that compares unfavorably in our own national character.'

[Philip Gibbs-1903]

In every corner of our island there are places with names which bring to mind the history of our forefathers and their fight for their freedom and liberty and those who have no time for History and Blunder on with their mistaken and devastating actions in the early years of the 21st century will ultimately fail  as they always will who fail to take the people with them in total disregard to their historical inheritance.

At the time these words were written the British Empire was a reality today in December 2006 the Empire is long past and it is England which now finds itself threatened with extinction. If only the Media and Press would put aside their blindness to the state of a once proud and just nation State and mention the forbidden name of England which as we all know has been written off the map of the United States of Europe -thankfully but that is no reason that a nation state with  1,500 years in the making should be ignored by those who claim to represent the 87 per cent of the population of our shared island and yet the name England is avoided when ever possible -sometimes it is referred to as 'Elsewhere'

Our sister nation states of Wales and Scotland have their nationhood and it about time that England claimed its right with its own

English Parliament

AT

WESTMINSTER.

*

ADDED MARCH 3,2018

 On occasion have  described the English People as an insular people as in respect of their instinctive protection of their unique constitutional inheritance and separation from the EU, which we find lacking in REMAINERS. As regards our outward spirit since Alfred's day and through the Elisabethan era and that of Empire. The Spirit of England as Winston Churchill

The Spirit of England

-

Churchill in London -

St George’s Day-1953.

*

An excerpt from Sir Winston Churchill’s broadcast speech to the Honourable Artillery Company, given in London 40 years ago-

on St. George’s Day,

*

THIS ENGLAND

Publication -Spring-1993.

 

‘It is twenty years since I had to speak on the toast of

ENGLAND

And on

St. George’s Day.

Twenty years - it’s a long time and a lot has happened, but in those bygone days I did try to see what would have happened if St. George had lived twenty years ago, and really it does apply very much to what might happen if he lived today.

 

I said St. George would arrive in Cappadocia accompanied not by a horse but by Secretary of State. He would be armed not with a lance but with several flexible formulas.

 

He would, of course, be welcomed by the local branch of the League of Nations Union - or I ought to alter that to be correct and say the United Nations Union.

 

He would propose a conference with the dragon - a Round Table Conference - no doubt it would be so much more convenient for the dragon’s tail.

 

He would make a Trade Agreement with the Dragon. He would loan the dragon a lot of money. The maiden’s release would be referred to Geneva (it would now be to New York), the dragon observing all his rights meanwhile. Finally, the dragon would be photographed with St, George.

 

Now, I do not think there’s anything very wrong with this passage although twenty years have passed, but there are a few things I would like to mention about

ENGLAND

 I’m not boasting but I would like to say that here no one questions the fairness of our

 Courts of Law and Justice.

We have our own way of life that is so. Here no one thinks of persecuting a man on account of his religion or his race.

 

Here everyone, except the criminals, looks on the policeman as the friend and servant of the public.

 

Here we provide for poverty and misfortune with more compassion, in spite of all our burdens, than any other country.

Here we assert the rights of the citizen against the

 

STATE

 -       criticize the

-    GOVERNMENT of the DAY

 -without failing in our duty to the

 Crown

 - or our LOYALTY to the

QUEEN.

 

If I’m not detaining you too long there are two points I would like to make.

 One is our weakness.

Our weakness is that there are always a certain number of English people who wake up every morning -very brainy they are -they wake up and they look all round the fields and they think

 

‘NOW WHAT IS THERE THAT BELONGS TO OUR COUNTRY THAT WE CAN GIVE AWAY?’

 

[Reminds us of Tony Blair and his cronies and adherents around the country in 2006.]

 or

 ‘WHAT IS THERE WE CAN FIND THAT HAS MADE OUR COUNTRY GREAT THAT WE CAN PULL DOWN?’

 

[Ditto -above -of course!]

 

Well, that is the question they ask themselves and THAT IS OUR WEAKNESS - they are very brainy and they have done us a great deal of harm.

[Ditto- as above - of course!]

On the other hand,

ENGLAND

-has a quality which no-one should overlook.

ENGLAND

-like Nature, never draws a line without smudging it.

 We lack the sharp logic of some other countries whom in other ways we greatly admire - in our climate, the atmosphere is veiled, there are none of these sharp presentations, an although we have our differences they do not divide us as they do in nearly all the other countries of the WORLD.

 There is a great underlying spirit of neighbourliness and there is without doubt a strong sense of

NATIONAL UNITY and LIFE

-       Which, though it doesn’t help us in the small matters with which we have to deal from day to day, may well be our Salvation in our troubles.

 ‘NOTHING CAN SAVE ENGLAND IF SHE WILL NOT SAVE HERSELF’

 

[That means each one of YOU in 2006]

If we lose FAITH in OURSELVES, in our capacity to guide and govern, if we lose

our will to live,

then indeed

our story is told.

If, while on all sides foreign nations are every day asserting a more aggressive and militant nationalism by arms and trade - if we remain paralysed by our own theoretical doctrines or plunged in the stupor of after-war exhaustion, all that the croakers predict will come true and

 

OUR RUIN WILL BE CERTAIN AND FINAL.

But why should we break up the solid structure of British power founded upon so much, kindliness, and FREEDOM?

 

Why should we break it up for dreams which may some day come true but now are only dreams, or it may be nightmares?

 

We ought as a nation and Empire -you won’t mind my mentioning that WORD? I didn’t get shouted down when I said it twenty years ago tonight -Empire, we might, we ought, to weather any storm that blows at least as well as any other existing system of human government.

 

We are at once more experienced and more truly united than any other people in the world.

 

It may well be, I say, that the most glorious chapters of our history are yet to be written. Indeed, the very problems and dangers that encompass us in our country ought to make English man and women of this generation glad to be here at such a time.

 

We ought to rejoice at the responsibilities with which destiny has honoured us and be proud that we the guardians of our country in an age when her life is a stake.

 

I have lived, since then, to see

 

OUR COUNTRY

 

-accomplish, achieve her

 

FINEST HOUR

-and I have no doubt that if the

SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

-continues, there is no reason at all why twenty years hence someone may not stand at the table of this ancient company and speak in the sense of pride and hope in which I have ventured to address you tonight.

* * *

 

[Sadly -the twenty years later with the connivance of the many members of YOUR Parliament of ALL parties and many in the business community the 1972 Act of Accession to the EU -then falsely described as the EEC -European Economic Community came into being.

 

There are still politicians alive today in 2006 who betrayed their country and a distinguished few including Tony Benn who tried to get the people to see through the LIES and DECEIT which led eventually in 2005 to the almost absorption of ENGLAND and her sister nation-states into the

Despotic and Totalitarian Police State

calling itself

 The United States of Europe.

THE BRAINCHILD OF ADOLF HITLER. 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/ ****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

‘I say we must not join Europe’-
Field Marshall Viscount Montgomery.

 

*          *          *

DECEMBER/06

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE       IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS

AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF THE BEAST

 OF

BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE TRAITOROUS EDWARD HEATH WILL BE RETURNED IN MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

In 1962, Field Marshall Montgomery found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality  HITLER'S plan for Europe under GERMAN Control.

 

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

STEPHEN GLOVER: Despite the deviousness of our rulers

WE'LL LEAVE THE

EU

 A YEAR FROM TODAY

[ON]

MARCH 29,2O19

thanks to the good sense of the people.

 

One year from today, the United Kingdom will leave the European Union. It is now possible to say this with something approaching certainty.

I confess to being somewhat surprised that this momentous upheaval seems very likely to take place despite the awesome efforts of the Establishment.

Immediately after the British people voted to leave in the June 2016 referendum, I was afraid the political class would find a way to frustrate the democratic will of the majority.

But despite countless scare stories propagated by anti-Brexit politicians and the BBC, which followed bloodcurdling predictions pumped out by Project Fear before the vote, this country is on track to exit the EU. In the circumstances, this is little short of a miracle.

 

I confess to being somewhat surprised that this momentous upheaval seems very likely to take place despite the awesome efforts of the Establishment and Westminster doomsayers

It is, above all, a testament to the resilience and sense of the British people — or at any rate the majority who voted for Brexit and have stuck to their guns despite repeated attempts to unnerve them.

Consider how many apocalyptic prophesies have been aimed at them by doomsayers in Westminster and Whitehall, and will doubtless continue to be aired until we leave — and probably beyond.

Before the referendum, Project Fear, orchestrated by the then Chancellor, George Osborne, informed us that a vote to leave would bring about ‘an immediate and profound economic shock’.

Arrogance

An instant recession was predicted if people had the temerity to vote Brexit. Interest rates would rise sharply and unemployment would soar. There would be an emergency Budget.

Of course, none of these things came to pass. The economy continues to grow at a reasonably smart pace, and every quarter it exceeds most official forecasts.

What is so amazing — and, to me, moving — is that 17.5 million people ignored these dire predictions from a ruling class expert in the dark arts of hoodwinking, which had all the resources of the State at its disposal.

At a cost of £9 million, the Government even sent a leaflet to every home, warning voters of the certain shocks to the economy if people were foolish enough to vote Leave.

It turns out the Man in Whitehall does not only not know best, which most of us had gathered long ago. He is also mendacious, manipulative and often mistaken.

This realisation is bound further to undermine the trust of ordinary folk in their rulers. On the whole, this is regrettable. Democracy works best if people have faith in the integrity and competence of those in authority. The loss of trust will take a long time to repair.

Having grossly (and, I believe, deliberately) exaggerated the perils of voting for Brexit, many with powerful positions in politics and the media have continued to try to make the hairs stand up on the back of our necks.

Among the more fatuous myths is that the availability of material used in cancer treatment may be under threat after Brexit. Planes will be grounded. Traffic queues will stretch from the port of Dover to the M25.

Most of these threats are obsessively recirculated by the BBC. There was a time when almost every morning brought a new, usually bogus, tale of woe, which was promptly forgotten and replaced by another one the following day.

Certainty

It was stated with absolute certainty that thousands of high-paid financial jobs would move from London to Frankfurt or Paris. When a report was published last August forecasting the loss of 40,000 City jobs, it was warmly cited by the Bank of England (which separately suggested that 75,000 jobs could go) and taken up by the BBC.

Yet an apparently authoritative survey produced by Reuters yesterday suggests a mere 5,000 jobs will be lost in London. As I write, this cheering story has not made it even to the outer reaches of the BBC’s extensive website.

Nor, on Tuesday, did Auntie make anything of a prestigious think-tank again naming London as the world’s leading financial centre — ahead of New York (second), Frankfurt (20th) and Paris (24th). I scoured the pages of the fanatically anti-Brexit Financial Times in vain for a mention of this accolade.

 

Some obdurate Europhile politicians such as Tony Blair, who still holds out for a second referendum, had better be careful

Meanwhile, intransigent Remainers have persisted in their insinuations that anyone who voted for Brexit must be thick or deluded — or both. Don’t such supercilious remarks convey an appalling sense of arrogance and contempt?

Actually, plenty of very brainy people supported Leave — not that they get much of a showing on the BBC. Mervyn King, the former Governor of the Bank of England; the eminent Cambridge historian Robert Tombs and the distinguished philosopher John Gray are just three of them, among thousands of examples.

It is enormously to the credit of the millions of people who voted Leave that they have absorbed, without any weakening of their resolve, this unceasing onslaught of propaganda calculated to undermine their cause.

Zealots

In fact, the very opposite has happened. In a recent poll, 57 per cent of respondents agreed with the proposition that the Government should ‘get on with implementing the result of the referendum to take Britain out of the EU and in doing so take back control of our borders, laws, money and trade’. Only 22 per cent disagreed.

So pronounced is the shift in public opinion in favour of Brexit that, even in reputedly Remainer Scotland, more backed the proposition (44 per cent) than opposed it (32 per cent).

Some obdurate Europhile politicians such as Nick Clegg, Tony Blair, Chris Patten and Chuka Umunna, who still hold out for a second referendum, had better be careful. They have a diminishing band of supporters and are in danger of appearing isolated zealots.

 

Actually, plenty of very brainy people supported Leave — not that they get much of a showing on the BBC. They include Mervyn King (pictured) - the former Governor of the Bank of England

I don’t doubt, of course, that there will be difficulties ahead, just as there have been difficulties in the past. There will be compromises, too, as there have already been.

No one can be pleased that Britain will have to pay the EU a leaving fee of £37 billion, albeit spread over several decades. As I wrote last week, there are suggestions of a sell-out over fish, though I am assured by aides of Chancellor Philip Hammond that he opposes trading our fishing rights for a better economic deal.

On the other hand, the Northern Irish border presents much less of a problem than the European Union pretends. Vehicles daily cross the border between Switzerland (not in the EU) and France (EU) without hindrance, as they do between Norway (outside the EU customs union) and Sweden (inside).

 

I am assured by aides of Chancellor Philip Hammond that he opposes trading our fishing rights for a better economic deal

The truth is that EU Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier and his Remainer supporters in Parliament are using the issue of the Northern Irish border as a device to keep Britain in the customs union.

I suspect the Government will work its way through this problem, just as it has grappled doggedly with other difficulties despite continuous brickbats from Remainers.

In the face of such insults, and Michel Barnier’s infuriating condescension, Brexit Secretary David Davis has shown commendable patience.

But the real heroes of this saga are the British people, who have seen through the lies and scare stories churned out by politicians. What a contrast to the deviousness and defeatism of our ruling class.

And this, surely, is cause for hope. When we leave the EU in a year’s time, there will be untold millions who believe in a great future for this country.

AND IT IS THEY,NOT POLITICIANS

WHO WILL DELIVER

IT!

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5556457/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Despite-deviousness-rulers-leave-EU-year-today.html#ixzz5B90qQi2y
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[CHANGES OF TEXT TYPE-STYLE-ETC-ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1520-'BREXIT MEANS BREXIT'-SAYS MRS MAY

 

AUSTIN MITCHELL: Don't let unpatriotic politicians betray our fishermen again

178

View
comments

Austin Mitchell (pictured) says he fought to protect the British fishing industry for 40 years as an MP

For 40 years as an MP, I fought to protect the British fishing industry — only to see it ruined in England and damaged in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Although Brexit now offers a great opportunity to rebuild the industry, it is tragic to see that chance being thrown away.

For it is appalling that Chancellor Philip Hammond is touting our fishing rights as disposable, and hinting that the Government may give them away in return for a better Brexit deal.

He has suggested that British fishermen might have to accept foreign trawlers having significant access even after the UK has regained control of its traditional fishing grounds.

Asked if it would be 'acceptable' to trade fishing rights for a better deal for lucrative sectors of the economy such as the City, Mr Hammond said: 'We would be open to discussing the appropriate arrangements for reciprocal access for our fishermen to EU waters and for EU fishermen to our waters.'

Shamefully, he's wobbling and playing into the hands of the EU's Brexit negotiators. For they are desperately cherry-picking parts of a deal (something, of course, our government's negotiators are not allowed to do) by demanding fishing access for their fleets in return for the UK having tariff-free trade access to the remaining 27 EU countries.

It is appalling that Chancellor Philip Hammond (pictured) is touting our fishing rights as disposable, and hinting the Government may give them away in return for a better Brexit deal

Such a craven concession would fit with the way our fishing industry has been sold out to foreigners over the years.

For four decades as MP for Grimsby (where fishing has been vital to the town since mediaeval times), I watched as fishing ministers (both Labour and Conservative) promised to get a better deal for the UK industry in the annual December negotiations.

I then watched as they betrayed those promises — announcing cuts in our quotas, bans on threatened species, as well as denying the British industry the subsidies and support that our European competitors were getting.

It even took a quarter of a century to get niggardly compensation for the thousands of fishermen who lost their jobs when our boats were expelled from Icelandic waters following the so-called Cod Wars in the Seventies.

What's more, we were refused the opportunity to rebuild our industry in our own waters, in the same way every other country was doing. It was Ted Heath who betrayed British fishing when, as prime minister, he took us into the Common Market. He saw our industry as 'expendable', giving away our fishing grounds in his desperate desire to join the European club.

And so we lost control of one of the richest fisheries in the world. For the six founding members of the Common Market ordained that member states should be given 'equal access' to each other's fisheries, re-defined as a 'common resource'.

For four decades as MP for Grimsby (pictured), I watched as fishing ministers (both Labour and Conservative) promised to get a better deal for the UK industry

Since then, it has been one sacrifice after another.

Ministers have not stood up for our fishing industry in the way their counterparts in other countries have done for their own.

For example, Iceland's government protected its waters from being looted, and Norway's membership of the Single Market did not give EU nations any fishing rights off its coast. As independent nations, Iceland and Norway have built up their fishing industries within their own 200-mile limits. So has almost every other fishing nation.

But not Britain, with its weak and unpatriotic ministers.

The fact is that other EU countries, having fished out their own waters, are desperate for ours.

Currently, foreign boats take 80 per cent of the catch in UK waters. EU countries catch nearly two-thirds of their fish in our waters.

Because 'Skipper' Ted Heath was conned into accepting 'equal access to a common resource', our waters are open to any citizen of another EU country with a boat and a net. There's no legal basis to the EU's demands. Fishing is not part of the Single Market, though fish products are.

Ministers have not stood up for our fishing industry in the way their counterparts in other countries have done for their own

Brexit means the UK leaving the EU. It means that instead of Brussels rules, the UN law of the sea will prevail — giving us sovereignty over territorial waters out to 200 miles, or the mid-point between nearer countries.

But the words of wobbling Mr Hammond suggest otherwise. No wonder there are grave fears our government might sacrifice our fishing industry by being daft enough to sign up yet again to the notorious Common Fisheries Policy. But it must not.

Environment Secretary Michael Gove, whose father had a fishing business that closed down because of EU fishing policy, has said: 'We're taking back control of our fishing policy.'

He added: 'It means that for the first time in more than 50 years we will be able to decide who can access our waters.'

Ministers must not renege on that promise. It is the Government's moral duty to protect our fishing grounds and maintain sustainable stocks to hand this precious resource to future generations. Other countries see our grounds as something to be looted for as long as they can — and preferably for ever.

Disingenuously, Brussels argues that fish don't have passports. They breed in one area and migrate to another.

That's true. But it shouldn't have been an excuse for a policy that covered immature and breeding stocks and punished British-based boats.

For many fish spawn in non-British areas of the North Sea, and are protected from fishing. But as soon as they mature and move into our waters, they can be caught.

Such unfairness is glaringly obvious to everyone in our fishing ports. But it seems Philip Hammond doesn't realise what those Brussels predators want. They want to frighten Britain and please the remaining 27 members.

 

The fact is that other EU countries, having fished out their own waters, are desperate for ours

It is no coincidence that the EU's chief Brexit negotiator, Michel Barnier, is a former French fishing minister who wants his countrymen to keep over-fishing our sea bass and anything else they can. It is also a natural desire for Germans. Almost all the herring they consume and 60 per cent of mackerel comes from British waters. One of the country's largest fish processing plants, Rugen Fisch, is in an area where Chancellor Angela Merkel has often canvassed during elections.

In my time as MP for Grimsby, I witnessed the over-fishing that the Common Fisheries Policy had led to, and have watched as foreign vessels suspected of over-fishing escaped checks by inspectors because they were too fast, while British boats that had done nothing wrong had nets inspected.

One of the worst scandals was the flagrant abuse of the rules which have allowed foreign vessels to register as British to cynically catch our quota.

Most surreally, I was once introduced to a man who I was told was the 'chair of the Fleetwood (Lancashire) Fishing Vessel Owners'. He was Spanish and spoke little English.

I've witnessed, in foreign ports, fish that has been illegally caught, being landed without a single check.

There's no reason for prolonging this farce. Or Britain's sad and enormous sacrifice.

The British fishing industry can only be rebuilt by safeguarding our waters and having the ability to enforce sustainable fishing. Only that certainty will bring investment.

After four decades of neglect and decline, our coastal fishing areas mustn't be betrayed again. I'm sorry, Mr Hammond, they are not negotiating counters simply to be traded away. They're a way of life and a vital British industry.

It's time for us to stand up and tell Monsieur Barnier: 'Allez vous en!' 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5480261/Dont-let-unpatriotic-politicians-betray-fishermen-again.html#ixzz59MnFZGjM
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

H.F.1496

THERESA MAY'S SURRENDER

 TO

HITLER'S LAIR

IN

SEPTEMBER 2017

 IS REMINISCENT

OF

PRIME MINISTER NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN'S

LACK OF GRIT

IN

1938

WHICH LED TO WORLD WAR 11 IN SEPTEMBER 1939

AS THEN WE HAVE THE PHONEY WAR AND THE

BATTLE FOR BRITAIN.

What would those who died protecting our skies in 1940 think of the GREAT BETRAYAL by fellow citizens to their FOE of TWO WORLD WARS-

GERMANY

IN SEPTEMBER 2017 WE haven't  even had our Dunkirk as we haven't in reality even crossed the Channel to claim our FREEDOM after 15 months since a majority voted for the return of THEIR COUNTRY- LAW-CUSTOM- given away by TRAITORS in 1972.

 

BEING IN THE UNDERBELLY OF EUROPE WON'T HELP ONE IOTA!-GERMANY IS ADJUDICATOR!

WE HAVE STALEMATE!

THE ANSWER IS TO BOYCOTT GOODS FROM FRANCE AND GERMANY WHO ARE THE DRIVER AND FIREMAN OF THE EU EXPRESS.

WE BUY MORE FROM EUROPE THAN THEY BUY FROM US!

BUSINESSES IN THE MAIN  SUPPORT THE EU

WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A WAR OF SORTS!

REMEMBER!

WE ARE NOT DEALING WITH A DEMOCRATIC BODY BUT WITH THE HITLERITE -AUTOCRATIC EU

*

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

***

TREASON

 

 

 

 

In November 2005 we put the following bulletin on our EDP WEBSITE

 

H.F1321 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLAN FOR EUROPE

BRITAIN AND EUROPE

The Culture of Deceit

by

Christopher Booker

 

*

PART  3

HEATH and 1970

[The Great Conspiracy]

 By the time Mr Heath came to launch his own, successful application to 'enter Europe' in 1970, he was already well versed in how to pretend that it was something other than what it was. Over the next five years, up to the time of the referendum in 1975, Parliament and the British people were incessantly assured that entry into the Common Market was simply a matter of trade and jobs, in no way would the British way of life be changed or Britain's right to srun her own affairs curtailed.

[At the referendum  In 1975 we voted NO!]

An oft-quoted line from Mr Heath's White Paper circulated to every household in the country in June 1971 promised

'there is no question of Britain losing essential sovereignty".

This from the same man who before his death in 2005 admitted to the British people that he had lied because he believed it was what should happen .He failed to let them know that he  Rippon and others were Nazi-spys since 1938-detailed HERE!

In a television broadcast to mark Britain's entry in January 1973, Heath said:

"there are some in this country who fear that in going into Europe we shall in some way sacrifice independence and sovereignty.  These fears, I need hardly say, are completely injustified"

YET SHORTLY AFTER Parliament had approved British entry, word came from Paris that President Pompidou was proposing that member states should make a solemn commitment to

"move irrevocably to economic and monetary union by 1980".

This made a complete mockery of all the assurances given to Parliament that any plans for monetary union had been dropped.  In a BBC documentary series The Poisoned Chalice in 1996, Sir Douglas-Home looking askance at the news. He said to Heath

"the House isn't going to like this"."But that" Denman recalled Heath replying, "is what it's all about". When Heath himself was asked by the BBC whether he could really have said such a thing, his only response, after an unsmiling pause, was

 "well, that's what it was about"..

Another revealing measure of how deeply the

CULTURE OF DECEIT

had now set in was the curious story of the common fisheries policy, and the Heath Government's response to the crude ambush set up by the Six to ensure that, as part of 

THE PRICE OF ENTRY

the four applicant countries Britain, Iceland, Denmark and Norway, would have to hand over to the community their fishing waters, the richest in the world. (all documents cited on the CFP are from PRO files in FO [FOREIGN OFFICE] 30/656-9)

On the very day the applications went in, June 30 1970, the Six hastily approved the principle that member-states should be given "equal access" to each other's fishing waters, under Brussels control. The point was that, because this had now become part of the acquis communautairte, the body of existing Community law, ythe applicant countries would have to accept a fait accompli. Within a few years, as everyone knew, national fishing waters were due to be extended out under international law to 200 miles. Because the waters belonging to the four applicants states would then contain most of the fish in European waters, this would give the SIX an astonishing prize.

In fact the Six knew that their new fisheries policy

WAS NOT LEGAL.

Among Foreign Office papers released in 2001 was an internal Council of Ministers document, dating from June 1970, which shows how desperate the Brussels lawyers had been to find some article in the

TREATY of ROME

 which could be used to authorise such a policy.

THERE WERE NONE.

The policy therefore had

NO LEGAL JUSTIFICATION,

and other papers show that the

'FOREIGN OFFICE'

KNEW THIS TOO.

[Since the sixties under Macmillan and Heath and since with the late exception of Margaret Thatcher who paid for her late conversion with 'NO!-NO!-NO! to closer union the so-called British Foreign Office was and still is with David Cameron in reality under the control of  BRUSSELS.]

But so determined was Mr Heath not to offend his prospective new partners that he decided

NOT TO CHALLENGE [THE LEGALITY OF] THEM.

Britain would simply accept the

ILLEGAL NEW FISHERIES POLICY

even though this would mean handing over

ONE OF THE GREATEST RENEWABLE ASSETS AND WOULD SPELL DISASTER FOR A LARGE PART OF HER FISHING FLEET.

Gradually the British fishermen got the idea that they were about to be

SACRIFICED

and in the closing months of 1970 various MPs for fishing constituences wrote to ministers asking what on earth was going on. They were fobbed off with evasive replies. In deed, as the recently released papers show

[ In 2001 under the 30 year rule-Public Records Office-Kew- re Heath's application to join the supposed Common Market but really a

politically based Super-state

 to be known as the

 European Union.

civil servants eventually worked out a careful form of words

[As they will  in February 2016]

intended to to reassure the fishermen that

'" proper account would be taken of their interests".

BUT

behind the scenes,

as a Scottish Office memo put it on November 9-1970

ministers were being told how important it was -not to get drawn into detailed explanations of just what problems might lie ahead for the fishermen because,

"in a wider UK context, they must be regarded as expendable."

 

The following year the White Paper promised that Britain would not sign an ACCESSION TREATY until the Common Market's fisheries policy was changed. Geoffrey Ribbon [a Nazi Spy  with Edward Heath and Roy Jenkins recruited by German (Nazi) intelligence part of of a spy cell in Balliol College in 1938-reported to MI5 by the MASTER

A. D. LINDSAY]

Rippon repeated this PROMISE to PARLIAMENT and to the TORY PARTY Conference.

But in November Mr Heath realised that time was running out.  Unless he accepted the fishing policy as it stood, his plans for Britain's entry in January 1973 would have to be abandoned.

He instructed Rippon to give way, and when Rippon was questioned about this in the House of Commons on December 13, 1972

HE ANSWERED WITH A STRAIGHT LIE.

He claimed Britain had retained complete control over the waters round her coastline, knowing that this was simply

NOT TRUE.

So barefaced was this

DECEIT

over fishing rights that successive government and fisheries ministers would continue to obfuscate the truth.

[TELL DAMN LIES]

of what had been done for the next

THREE DECADES

In June 1975, the month when inflation hit 27 percent,

ITS HIGHEST LEVEL IN HISTORY

came the

REFERENDUM

Surrounded by all the evidence of a

MAJOR ECONOMIC CRISIS,

[THE GREATLY MISLED AND LIED TO]

BRITISH PEOPLE

VOTED BY 2 to 1

TO REMAIN IN A

[SUPPOSED]

"COMMON MARKET"

which the vast majority believed was intended to be no more than a free-trading area arrangement'

The supporters of the YES! campaign, including the leaderships of all  three political parties [AS again in 2016] did little to disillusion them.  The message was that a 'YES' vote was all about protecting jobs [As yet again in 2016] and Prosperity', offering the lifeline Britain's ailing economy required.  As for any fears that there might be moves towards "an Economic andn Monetary Union" and "fixed exchange rates for the pound", the Wilson Government's own leaflet to every household promised categorically

" this threat has been removed".

END

 

 

*  *  *

 

[WE VOTED IN 1975 TO LEAVE THE NAZI-PLANNED

SUPERSTATE

AND  WE ARE STILL FIGHTING THIS NAZI ABOMINATION TODAY IN FEBRUARY 2016.

[Unfortunately even after 41 years we are still hearing the pathetic plea that we cannot LEAVE THE EU because that is where the business is. The last individual we spoke to a few days ago a technician with a mind to match could not understand that we would NOT be leaving EUROPE-THEY NEED US- but the

COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-UNDEMOCRATIC-EUROPEAN UNION

[What you are hearing from the lips of pro-EU ministers today in 2016 are the same LIES and DECEIT of 1972/3 and 1975 and ever since. We have even heard yet again about the 3million job loses -an interview on Channel 4 on February 16 -a pro-EU  minister struggling to find any constructive facts to support his pitiful view. From what we hear about Robots taking over millions of jobs in the future. The Government should be encouraging as many people particularly those who have no intention in ever integrating into our society but hope to bring about a ISLAMIC STATE to return to their natural habitat as soon as possible. It  is because of the ineptness and stupidity of the present and past governments who infected by the now discredited politically-correct notion of

MULTICULTURALISM

 has left the greater part of our major towns and Cities as

FOREIGN ENCLAVES.

 

 

ENGLAND

'WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.'

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

[THE PROOF OF THIS STATEMENT IN 2015 IS SHOWN IN MANY TOWNS AND CITIES IN OUR ONCE FAMILIAR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND BEFORE THE EU AND MASS IMMIGRATION FROM

 

FOREIGN CULTURES LEADING TO FOREIGN ENCLAVES

WITH THEIR BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 AND MORE IMMIGRATION FROM MUSLIM COUNTRIES  AND FROM  ELSEWHERE WILL UNLESS FIRM DECISIVE ACTION IS TAKEN NOW! WILL LEAD TO A FOREIGN TAKEOVER OF OUR COUNTRY WITHIN A FEW GENERATIONS . WE HAVE SEEN SOME EXAMPLES ON HOW THEY CAPITALISE ON THEIR CUSTOMARY ELECTION TACTICS ONCE DESCRIBED BY A JUDGE INVESTIGATING ELECTION FRAUD IN A LABOUR CONSTITUENCY IN BIRMINGHAM AND WOULD FIT EVENTS RECENTLY IN

TOWER+HAMLETS

AS AN EXAMPLE OF A

BANANA REPUBLIC.  

*

No ISLAMIC STATE would allow millions of Christians or Unbelievers to settle in their countries unless they converted to ISLAM. The PENALTY for not doing so in an ISLAMIC STATE is DEATH. It has been the GREAT WEALTH of SAUDI ARABIA brought about by their OIL DEPOSITS - a legacy of the FIRST WORLD WAR and the BRITISH-FRENCH-USA foreign policy, and the closeness of Cameron and his predecessors to the brutal regime and permitting the sales of large quantities of ARMS used to further the SAUDI HARD FUNDAMENTALIST DOCTRINE worldwide which has caused great suffering in Middle East countries and even subversion in ENGLAND itself. The results of the CHAOS now set to EXPLODE at any time ,which hopefully , will change OUR WORLD into a more EQUITABLE and FAIRER SOCIETY.]

FEBRUARY 17-2016

 

IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS

H.F.676/3

 

Five ways to judge the

Brexit Deal

 

Theresa May says a successful agreement MUST 'strengthen the union', 'protect jobs' and make Britain 'a modern, open, outward-looking, tolerant European democracy'

  • Theresa May will warn Brussels relations could breakdown if it tries to punish UK

  • In key speech she will outline five tests against which final deal will be judged

  • Mrs May will say any deal must give UK ‘control of our borders, laws and money’

  • Speech comes as EU chiefs warn talks could be derailed by Mrs May's red lines

 

Theresa May will today warn Brussels that relations could break down for years if it tries to punish Britain with a bad Brexit deal.

Outlining five tests against which the final deal will be judged, the Prime Minister will pledge to deliver ‘real change’, saying any agreement must ‘respect the result of the referendum’ and give the UK ‘control of our borders, laws and money’.

But she will also warn that it must be fair to both sides if it is to endure, and that the worst outcome would be to ‘find ourselves back at the negotiating table because things have broken down’.

In an upbeat assessment, Mrs May will say she wants to strike a trade deal more comprehensive than currently exists ‘anywhere in the world today’.

 

Theresa May, pictured greeting Donald Tusk on the steps of Downing Street yesterday, will warn Brussels that relations could break down for years if it tries to punish Britain over Brexit

 

Outlining five tests against which the final deal will be judged, the Prime Minister will pledge to deliver ‘real change’ in a key speech today. She spoke with Mr Tusk yesterday

The speech comes at a critical moment, with senior European Union figures warning that negotiations could be derailed by Mrs May’s ‘red lines’. 

Government sources last night insisted that she remains committed to leading the UK out of the customs union, single market and jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. 

But after a week in which the PM has come under intense pressure from establishment figures to soften her stance, pro-Brexit MPs are on red alert for any sign of backsliding.

ecretary David Davis and Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson yesterday used a two-hour Cabinet meeting about the speech to demand the removal of a line making a ‘binding commitment’ to align with EU rules and regulations in certain sectors.

The two Brexiteers are said to have feared the commitment could shackle parts of the economy to Brussels forever – making a mockery of the referendum pledge to ‘take back control’.

One Cabinet source said the phrase had not been approved by members of the PM’s Brexit ‘war cabinet’ at their Chequers meeting last week and appeared to have been slipped in by civil servants.

However, Mrs May is expected to agree to abide by the EU’s state aid rules, which are designed to prevent governments subsidising uncompetitive industries.

Downing Street played down the row, saying the Cabinet had agreed the speech was ‘a real step forward’ ahead of the start of trade talks with Brussels later this month. Sources said Mrs May’s speech would set out an ‘ambitious but credible’ vision for a comprehensive partnership with the EU after Brexit.

Speaking at Mansion House in the City of London, she will insist the two sides have a ‘shared interest’ in getting it right. She will say: ‘I want the broadest and deepest possible agreement – covering more sectors and co-operating more fully than any free trade agreement anywhere in the world today.

‘I believe that is achievable because it is in the EU’s interests, as well as ours, and because of our unique starting point, where on day one we both have the same laws and rules. So rather than having to bring two different systems closer together, the task will be to manage the relationship.’

The PM will spell out her vision of a UK that is a ‘champion of free trade based on high standards… building a bold and comprehensive economic partnership with our neighbours in the EU, and reaching out beyond to foster trade agreements with nations across the globe’. But she will also warn that Brexit must lead to ‘wider change’ in society so that ‘no community in Britain [will] ever be left behind again’.

Today’s speech was set to be delivered in Newcastle to underline Mrs May’s determination to make Brexit work for the whole country. It was moved to the capital because of the weather disrupting travel conditions.

The speech follows weeks of negotiations between senior Cabinet ministers over how far to go in sacrificing Britain’s new freedoms in order to maintain trade in key sectors linked to the European economy. 

The Prime Minister will say the deal must ‘protect people’s jobs and security’, adding: ‘People in the UK voted for our country to have a new and different relationship with Europe, but while the means may change our shared goals surely have not – to work together to grow our economies and keep our people safe.’

Sources last night said the tone of the speech would be ‘emollient’, despite Mr Davis warning this week that Britain’s £40billion ‘divorce’ bill could be axed if the EU tries to cross the UK’s red lines on issues such as the Irish border.

One source said: ‘The possibility of no deal is still a live thing, but it is not what we are emphasising here.’

European Council president Donald Tusk yesterday insisted ‘frictionless’ trade is impossible outside the customs union. Mrs May will acknowledge the more the UK chooses to diverge, the more trade barriers it will face, but she will insist that it is not in the interests of either side to punish the other.

Week of relentless Remain plotting 

The run-up to Theresa May’s Brexit speech today has been dominated by interventions from prominent Remainers.

Senior Tories believe it is a co-ordinated bid to keep Britain in the customs union and single market – or even overturn the result of the referendum altogether.

Jeremy Corbyn confirmed a Labour U-turn on Brexit on Monday, saying the party will back staying in a customs union. He also appealed to Tory rebels to vote with Labour to defeat the Government.

 

Prominent Remainers have made key interventions in the lead up to Mrs May's Brexit speech. Jeremy Corbyn said Labour will back staying in a customs union

His policy was swiftly backed by the CBI. On Tuesday former Whitehall mandarin Sir Martin Donnelly told how the economic benefits of leaving the EU will be worth no more than a ‘packet of crisps’.

Shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer also held private talks with EU officials in Brussels. Pro-Remain sources leaked a confidential letter from Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson to the Prime Minister, to discredit his views on the Irish border problem.

Wednesday saw former prime minister Sir John Major urging senior Tories to join forces with the opposition and block Brexit. Lord Mandelson praised Sir John and called for a free vote in Parliament on any deal as well as a second referendum.

EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier published controversial plans that could force Northern Ireland to stay in the customs union – effectively breaking up the UK. George Osborne, the former chancellor, tweeted: ‘Why the synthetic Breixteer [sic] anger over EU text on Irish border?’

Yesterday EU Council president Donald Tusk said not joining an EU customs union would make ‘frictionless’ trade impossible. Former prime minister Tony Blair renewed his calls for a second referendum.

 

 

Read  more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5452547/Theresa-Five-ways-voters-judge-Brexit.html#ixzz58m3ABXHP
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

AND

 

 

Tories urge Theresa May to be 'more like a lion' | Daily Mail Online

*

 

MARCH 2,2018

H.F.1493

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Knights Templar admitted back to inner sanctum of monotheism after 711-year hiatus

 

For the first time since Friday, October 13th, 1307, the Knights Templar have been invited back into the inner sanctum of monotheism, according to Templar and P2 Freemason lodge sources.  So, a 711-year-old injustice, one that gave rise to the superstition of Friday the 13th being unlucky, is finally being addressed.  This is just another sign that we are experiencing events that can only be described as biblical.  Remember that in February of 2016, the Roman and Russian churches ended their thousand-year schism.  Will the Muslim, Jewish, and Christian schisms be next to end?  Maybe we will find out soon.

Anyway, now the Templars will be merging with the Knights of Malta, and this will “provide access for the Templars to the Vatican itself,” according to Andrew Heim, of the Sovereign Military Order of the Temple of Jerusalem, aka the Templars.  Furthermore, the Templars will be given “access to the inner sanctum of the Abrahamic religions, seen with the access afforded to the Vatican and to the Holy Land.  In addition, this inner sanctum will include access to the controversial Prieure de Sion made popular by Dan Brown’s novel The Da Vinci Code…” says Heim.
http://www.chevaliersfideles.com/international-news-2018

This event is just the latest sign of a fundamental change of direction for Western civilization away from war and toward peace and development, according to these sources.  If all goes well, trillions of dollars will soon be made available to both pay off debt of the U.S. government and the private sector, as well as finance a massive campaign to end poverty, stop environmental destruction, and turn the planet earth into the paradise it is meant to be, the sources say.  This is now being talked about in public by Western leaders and reported on in the corporate media.  Remember, you read it here first.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/18/us-japan-india-australia-mull-alternative-to-chinas-belt-and-road.html

The earth alliance fighting to free humanity from Babylonian debt slavery is also winning on multiple fronts, with senior satanic cabalists dying, disappearing, or losing power at an accelerating pace.  CIA sources are now confirming, for example, that Jacob Rothschild …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Any intel on Jared Rand?

 

Ben:

Would you have any intel on Jared Rand?

He says there is a “bad RV” and a “good RV,” and that the bad RV is the cryptocurrency, which is the cabal’s new fiat currency.  They will assure everyone it is gold-backed and “rescue” us from all the others.  (The recent warnings from the BIS against cryptocurrency feel like a cabal deception.)

The good RV is the gold-backed new currency.

Jared Rand is new on the scene and has all the positive off-world helpers’ projections well organized, as well as the spiritual themes put out by the likes of Wilcock and Goode.

Any thoughts on this?

Thanks,
–DS


DS,
All I can say is that we are tired of waiting for things to happen, so we are working on starting a gold-backed cryptocurrency.  And we like to think we are the good guys.
–BF

Bad Guys into Good Guys?

 

Dear Ben:

I heard in your talk with Robert David Steele that you think we should pay the bad guys off and change things to turn the bad guys (NWO mafia) into good guys.

I guess you don’t realize these bad guys are not Human–they have Human bodies and a Reptilian soul.  I’m sure of this although I can’t prove it, but my work is at http://www.icheckyoursoul.com.

I have a God-given ability to read souls by the use of a pendulum, and almost everyone that has used my services agrees with my findings.

These Bad Guys are polarized evil and their souls come from the Draconian Reptilians, so they almost can’t change!  If we were to pay them off and take them out of power, so to speak, what’s to stop them from continuing funding their evil corporations and keep up chemtrails, GMOs, vaccines, Agenda 21 or Agenda 2030, wars, and many other evil activities.

These Reptilian-soul people will not stop, and they intend to have just them in the ruling class and everyone else be a worker/slave.  We must take these evil people out of our society while we still can.  What say you?

A Long Time Subscriber


My view is that the true criminals will face justice, but the ones who went along because it was a choice of “either go along or die” should be allowed truth and reconciliation.
–BF

 
 

Nailing the calumny that LEAVE voters are stupid, Cambridge academics launch...

 

BRAINS FOR BREXIT

 

Brains for Brexit! Meet the historians, philosophers, QCs and ex-MI6 boss who make up the 41 top-thinkers fighting the tide of Remain 'propaganda'

  • New site briefingsforbrexit.com challenges view all academics want to Remain
  • Economists, lawyers, philosophers, historians and social scientists are involved
  • Website will challenge 'ludicrous' claims on economic consequences of Brexit 

1k

More than 40 of the country's top thinkers have launched a pro-Brexit campaign to fight the tide of Remain 'propaganda'.

Leading economists, lawyers, philosophers, historians and social scientists want to challenge the impression all academics oppose leaving the EU.

The group, which includes Remain voters, has criticised the contempt shown by those seeking to reverse the referendum result who regard large numbers of Leave supporters as 'unworthy of consideration'.

Trying to overturn that vote 'would outrage democratic sovereignty, cause dangerous and lasting dissension, and make the United Kingdom an international laughing stock', they said.

A new website, briefingsforbrexit.com, will challenge 'ludicrous' claims about the economic consequences of leaving.

It is the brainchild of two Cambridge academics, the historian Professor Robert Tombs and the economist Dr Graham Gudgin.

Other figures who have signed up to the project include former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove, the Labour peer Lord Glasman, the Oxford law professor Dr Richard Ekins and Baroness Ruth Deech, the former chairman of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, The Sunday Times reported.

Dr Gudgin, an emeritus professor at the Judge Business School at the University of Cambridge, and Professor Tombs, emeritus professor of French history at Cambridge and the author of The English And Their History, both voted in favour of entering the Common Market in 1975, but backed Leave in the referendum, concerned about centralisation of powers in Brussels. 

Professor Tombs said: 'To every crisis that comes along, the answer is always more centralisation, never less.'

Dr Gudgin said he came up with the idea for the website 'during one of those terribly pessimistic weeks. When Theresa May wasn't going to last until teatime and there was definitely going to be a second referendum.

'Together we thought, 'Gosh, we ought to be better organised than at the last referendum'.' 

 
 

He added: 'Nobody who appears on the BBC and says 'this is going to be a catastrophe' is ever asked what their view is based on.'

Professor Tombs said his motivation was the 'whole tide of propaganda about how awful everything was, how awful everything was going to be, and we didn't believe this.

'We realised quite a lot of other people didn't believe it either.' They criticised the contempt shown by many Remainers to those who voted Leave.

Professor Tombs said: 'Graham and I have working-class or lower middle-class backgrounds. 

'I do feel you just can't write off a large part of the population as being unworthy of consideration.'

He said he voted Leave because he feared the EU would break up or become 'much more centralised,' adding: 'We've seen how that works in Italy and Greece: A political choice is defeated by sheer weight of economic pressure – if you do this, your currency or economy will collapse.

 

I don't think that would last and I don't see how it could have a good end. I don't think we either want to be, or ought to be, a party to that.'

Professor Tombs said his research found that the narrative of the decline of post-imperial Britain in the mid-20th century – one of the driving forces behind the decision to join the EU – was a myth. 

'I think, speaking as a historian and as a patriot, we were taken into the EU on a misunderstanding of our situation,' he said. 

'It would have been better in the 1960s and 1970s to continue to ask for a free trade agreement.

'I don't think most people understood the full implications of what we were signing up to politically.'

Their analysis of British growth in per-capita GDP since 1952 showed it was better before we joined the bloc than after. Dr Gudgin said recent Government figures which purported to show huge falls in growth in most regions of the EU after Brexit were 'ludicrous'.

 

He led a team of academics who proved that the assumptions behind the Project Fear papers produced by the Treasury before the referendum were wrong, and failed to take account of the fact that Britain was almost the only EU state that had more trade outside the EU than inside.

He criticised its 'extreme assumptions' which led the Treasury to 'an exaggerated estimate of the impact of Brexit'. 

The two academics said there was a rush of interest from other researchers after their project was conceived – but some Brexiteer academics were afraid to go public for fear it would hit their promotion prospects. 

Many universities get a lot of money from the EU, leading to many academics taking a 'narrow, corporatist view'.

Dr Gudgin said: 'One of our contributors said he was told by a younger pro-Brexit colleague that his professor had told him that people who voted Brexit were the sort of people who sent his relatives to concentration camps.'

Professor Tombs added: 'I thought one thing we academics were paid to do was help explain things to people, but universities have become so simple-minded about this.' 

 

 

H.F.1484-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT-NO SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMANY TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE.

PETER OBORNE

 

 

PETER OBORNE: Our complacent and complicit foreign aid civil servants should hang their heads in shame over the Oxfam charity scandal which will take years to recover from

Oxfam will take years to recover from the sickening scandal in Haiti, but the UK Department for International Development is also in the dock. Former Secretary of State Priti Patel (pictured) is believed to have known about it all and stayed quiet

Oxfam will take years to recover from the sickening scandal in Haiti. Other charities, too, whose staff have been exposed for awful misdemeanours have seen their reputations badly damaged.

However, the Department for International Development (DfID), which has given hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers' money to these charities, is also in the dock.

We now know its officials were aware of the shocking culture of sexual abuse, exploitation and paedophilia that exists in Oxfam and in much of the rest of the aid sector that DfID oversees.

Former DfID secretary Priti Patel said government officials 'at the highest levels' knew about aid workers' sex abuse (with some victims being children) but tried to keep it hushed up.

She said the Oxfam scandal in Haiti was just 'the tip of the iceberg'. Yet DfID did nothing to stop it.

This means the taxpayer-funded DfID — whose mission statement is to 'tackle the global challenges of our time, including poverty and disease, mass migration, insecurity and conflict' and to 'build a safer, healthier, more prosperous world' — must bear responsibility for what went on. Indeed, it's very possible that, without the newspaper investigation that exposed the Haiti scandal, DfID officials would still be condoning such appalling behaviour.

There is clearly something very rotten at the heart of DfID. Yet the department seems blissfully unaware of this.

As recently as January, DfID's permanent secretary Matthew Rycroft boasted that he was in charge of a 'well run and well organised department'.

Such complacency beggars belief. For the truth is that its complicity in the Oxfam scandal is just the latest example of DfID's tolerance of corruption and worse. 

As has been well documented, it shovels billions of pounds a year into countries run by some of the most brutal regimes in the world.

Very few dictators are too bloodthirsty or barbaric for DfID not to do business with.

Cynically, they abuse the generosity of people in the West by using their donations in order to spend less themselves on welfare programmes for their own people.

Instead, DfID's largesse allows them to invest huge sums in excessive arms budgets — or, worse, line their own pockets and amass personal fortunes in Swiss bank accounts.

 

Patel said the Oxfam scandal in Haiti was just 'the tip of the iceberg'. Yet DfID did nothing to stop it, writes Peter Oborne 

No wonder it is said — not in jest — that the definition of overseas aid is 'the transfer of cash from the pockets of poor people in rich countries to the bank accounts of rich people in poor countries'.

Lest it be forgotten, Britain's foreign aid budget last year alone totalled £13.3 billion. The cases of this money being abused are too numerous to list in full.

In Ethiopia, for example, DfID spent hundreds of millions with a Marxist government that puts communist propaganda into school textbooks. 

 

Mikelange Gabo (pictured) claims sacked Oxfam boss Roland Van Hauwermeiren started a sexual relationship with her when she was just 17 

In Syria, our taxes fund armed groups which my sources in the country say may be linked to Al-Qaeda.

In Pakistan, Imran Khan, the former national cricket captain and a leading opposition leader, called for foreign aid to be halted because he believes it corrupts and weakens his country.

He says: 'Why should the Pakistani rich bother to pay taxes when foreign loans and aid money are always there to cover up their incompetence and corruption and pay for their lavish lifestyle?'

Also, he asks: 'Why should politicians bother to fix the economy when they can artificially maintain it' with foreign donations?

 

Scandal-hit Van Hauwermeiren (pictured) is alleged to have spotted her in the street while she was eight months pregnant and told her: 'I find you very sexy, how can I help you?'

Many respected economic studies show the best way to lift people out of poverty is not through handing out aid but through trade, encouraged by free market capitalism. 

But this is frowned upon by many DfID civil servants and charity activists, a large proportion of whom hold Left-wing views and spend their lives going from one well-paid job in the bloated public sector to another.

Equally, I am convinced overseas aid has increasingly less to do with helping the poor in foreign countries and more to do with self-preening government ministers trying to flaunt their compassion.

 

Pictured: A mountainous region outside Haitian capital Port-au-Prince 

These virtue-signallers are more interested in boasting about the size of their budgets and posing for photocalls during short visits abroad rather than ensuring taxpayers' money is well spent.

And I'm afraid the truth is that DfID has not been well served in the choice of its ministers over recent years.

Under Tory-led governments there has been Andrew Mitchell who went native and was widely rebuked after claiming, at a time of austerity at home, that he wanted the UK to be seen around the world as a foreign aid superpower.

Tactlessly, he criticised his successor, Justine Greening, saying she never wanted the job and that she had failed to rebut claims that huge sums of foreign aid had been lost in corruption and waste.

Greening didn't last long. Her replacement was Priti Patel, who was only in the job 15 months before being sacked for breaking the ministerial code by holding undeclared meetings in Israel, in a clumsy bid, it seemed, to promote her own political ambitions.

Patel's position was all the more disingenuous because, before her appointment, she had argued that

DfID ought to be abolished. 

She quickly reversed this once in charge. And during her tenure, nothing changed.

Patel's replacement, Penny Mordaunt, now has an opportunity to restore discipline and standards.

 

The Oxfam Haiti scandal shocked the nation after it emerged earlier this month 

Above all, she should order a root-and-branch overhaul of her entire department.

Britain has spent about £70 billion of taxpayers' money on international aid since the Conservatives came to power in 2010. This is an incredible £2,500 from every British family.

Only a forensic audit can determine how much has been squandered and how much actually needs to be spent at all.

As a foreign reporter, I've visited many trouble spots around the world where DfID money is spent, and wouldn't deny for a moment that there are places where it has done a great deal of good.

Yet I've also witnessed evidence of a huge waste of money, not least in Pakistan, where hundreds of millions have been frittered away in a largely fruitless attempt to reform the education system.

I believe the Government's commitment to spend 0.7 per cent of gross domestic product on foreign aid a year is utterly misguided.

In a country where NHS beds are scarce and a care system is collapsing, we simply can't afford that largesse.

I dearly hope Penny Mordaunt, the latest minister in charge of what has become a gold mine for corrupt foreign dictators and child abusers, has the courage and will to restore discipline to her out-of-control department.

Otherwise, public belief in international aid, and respect for the noble principle of charity-giving, may never recover.

 

Too soft on Myanmar

On his recent visit to Myanmar (formerly Burma) to see the devastation inflicted by the country's army on the minority Rohingya Muslims, Boris Johnson challenged the government's false propaganda that the Rohingya burnt down their own houses. 

He should have gone further and accused the Myanmar government — led by Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi — of carrying out genocide. 

I'm convinced he held back because it would have necessitated the British government stepping in to try to stop the killing — something it hasn't the stomach for. 

Why won't the Foreign Office do anything to halt the rape and murder in our former colony? 

 

On his recent visit to Myanmar (formerly Burma) to see the devastation inflicted by the country's army on the minority Rohingya Muslims, Boris Johnson (pictured) challenged the government's false propaganda that the Rohingya burnt down their own houses

 

Today, Ukip members meet to vote on the future of their party's beleaguered leader, Henry Bolton.

He has become a figure of public ridicule — defying colleagues' calls for him to resign after he walked out on his wife and children for an affair with a far younger woman who has been exposed for appalling racist views.

Yesterday, Nigel Farage — who has acted like the most irritating back-seat driver since standing down as leader after the EU referendum — gave his backing to Bolton.

He's right. Useless though Bolton undoubtedly is, Ukip will become even more of a laughing stock if it has its ninth change of leader since 2009.

 

Today, Ukip members meet to vote on the future of their party's beleaguered leader, Henry Bolton (pictured)



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5402335/

PETER-OBORNE-foreign-aid-civil-servants-ashamed.html#ixzz57O0ZUQl3
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

Peter Osborne: Boris Johnson's

Brexit

views are persuasive

 

H.F.1479

 

A STORY OF SACRIFICE-THE SPITFIRE -ITS DESIGNER R. J. MITCHELL-A SAVIOUR OF THE SKIES OVER ENGLAND.

Its exactly 70 years since the first Spitfire took to the air. But the plane that won the war almost didn’t make it. Its remarkable designer was fighting a tragic personal battle -and time was running out.

*

RACE FOR

THE SKIES

*

Daily Mail

Saturday, March 4-2006

by

 Tony Rennell

FOR THE many men in her life, it was love at first sight. ‘I was captivated by her sheer beauty,’ declared one of her eminent lovers, a government minister.

‘She was slimly built with a beautifully proportioned body and graceful curves just where they should be. She was every young man’s dream.

 

‘Mind you, she was what mother called a fast girl. I was advised to approach her gently. But once safely embraced in her arms, I found myself reaching heights of delight I had never before experienced.

 

IT WAS NOT A WOMEN that Captain Harold Balfour Under-Secretary of State in the pre-war Ministry of Air, was drooling over back in the thirties [The Gathering Storm years] after his first meeting with HER. It was the British fighter plane that would change the course of history -the

 

Spitfire

 

But for all his passion, even he could not have predicted what a battle-winner she would prove to be. Not that she would come to be the very icon of British guts and defiance. Nor that decades later -into the 21st century in fact-the sight of her flying over London on special anniversaries would bring tears to the eyes of grown men and women.

   

The promise of a Spitfire in the skies can still lure thousands to an Air Show, just for a glimpse of those elegant lines, the purr of that Rolls-Royce engine and all the history and glamour, death and glory, packed into her 31ft fuselage and 37ft wing-span.

 

TOMORROW

Sunday the 5th March 2006 is another historic anniversary.

It is 70 years [In March 2018-it will be 82 years ] to the day since the very first

 

Spitfire

  

Prototype climbed into the skies at

  

Eastleigh in Hampshire

 

-half its fuselage covered in a dirty yellowish-green wash, the rest rough and unpainted.

 

Captain ‘Mutt’ Summers, the Test Pilot, took her up to 3,000 ft and had her back on the ground in 8 minutes later. But in that short time in the air, the prototype won him over.

 

“the handling qualities of this machine are remarkably good “,

 

he wrote in the Test-Flight Log.

 

Destiny awaited. Two days later, on March 7-1936, the troops of a resurgent Germany under Chancellor Adolf Hitler marched over the border to reclaim the Rhineland it had been forced to give up after losing the World War I.

 

The first steps had been taken towards the conflict for which, in every sense, the SPITFIRE was made.

 

It is difficult to overstate her impact on events. The Spitfire’s revolutionary design with its extra edge of speed and manoeuvrability stopped the German Messerschmitts in 1940 that until then had had no match in the skies over Europe.

 

But what these brave men -and many among the generations who had followed -never realised was that the Spitfire so nearly didn’t make it to the drawing board. In a desperate race against time, its brilliant creator Reg. Mitchell was fighting cancer as he put the finishing touches to his design for the aircraft.

 

He lived to see his creation make it into the skies -but died in 1937, two years before the outbreak of the war and never having seen the leanest, meanest fighting machine of its age in combat.

 

He was just 42 years old.

 

Reg Mitchell, or ‘R J’ as he was known is a name generally lost on all but air aficionados these days. So who was he?

 

A new book by his son, Gordon Mitchell, gives a glimpse into the life of this little-known engineering genius.

 

He was a son of a headmaster in Stoke and from his earliest days delighted in making things. He even built his own lathe. He left school at 16, became an apprentice in a railway engineering works and soon graduated to the drawing office.

 

Here his outstanding inventiveness quickly became apparent. Wanting to spread his wings, as it were, he applied for a job at the Supermarine Aviation in Southampton, a firm setting out in the infant business of seaplanes and flying boats.

 

RJ had stumbled on his life’s work and the outlet for his considerable talent.

He shot up the hierarchy until, just 25; he was Chief Designer and Chief Engineer with the job of creating the fastest seaplanes in the world.

 Time and again Mitchell’s planes were entered for the Schneider Trophy, an International Flying Contest over water. His success rate was remarkable as he learned how to streamline an aircraft to get every last knot of speed out of her.

 

In between the wars, with the help of the expert team he built at Supermarine, he designed no fewer than 24 different aircraft. A shy man with a slight stammer, he never pushed himself forward for the headlines his Schneider successes were increasingly grabbing.

 

He gave that glory to the pilots whom he admired for their courage, the more so when two died in accidents in his experimental planes.

 

But if reserved in public, he was a martinet in the office, typically standing staring at his drawing board for hours puffing on his pipe as he worked out complex problems. It was a foolish employee who interrupted him deep in thought.

 

At home, son Gordon remembered flashes of temper, followed by long moody silences. ‘He had no time for anyone he considered a fool and could be rude if the individual concerned did not quickly get the message.

 

Then again, he had great charm, his son recalled, and a sense of fun. When not preoccupied with work, his blue eyes shone and his smile was warm.

 

Mitchell was a very British genius, quiet, retiring, never personally pushy. Nor would he ever be rich, for all his exceptional talent and success.

 

At Supermarine (later part of Vickers), his pay as Chief Designer began at £1,200 a year rising by £100 every December until it reached £2,500.a handsome enough sum for those days and equivalent to £76,000 today.

 

Even after being appointed a Director, he would remain essentially a well-paid employee, in an era when results were not rewarded with share options and ‘fat cat’ bonuses. The patents for his inventions stayed with the company.

 

He brought a large detached house with peaceful gardens and a live in maid in the suburbs, played tennis and golf

And took family holidays at Bournemouth.

 

He was never one for the high life, despite the fast and wealthy international aviation set he sometimes dealt with. He preferred the company of his fellow workers, for whom he had great admiration. His best night out was with the lads at the drawing -room party.

 

His one indulgence was a Rolls Royce car, but since Sir Henry Royce was a fellow engineer and collaborator, that was not surprising.

But by 1933 Mitchell was harbouring a grim secret: He had been diagnosed with bowel cancer. He had a major operation and was fitted with a colostomy bag. Inventive man that he was, he even designed a better bag to conceal his disability.

 

A lesser man would have stopped work, but Mitchell was driven. By the mid-thirties, the world of peaceful international flying competitions began to change to one of more deadly and warlike rivalries. As a result, the Air Ministry in London sought tenders for a fast ‘killer’ fighter plane.

 

Mitchell’s first attempt was a flop. It had an open cockpit and a fixed undercarriage and could reach only 230 mph, 20mph short of the Ministry’s specification and a long way off his 400mph seaplanes.

 

Despite the terrible pain and distress of his illness, he stayed at his design desk as he smoothed out the Spitfire’s problems ahead of her first Test Flight.

 

In the next design, he retained just the name-

 

Spitfire

 

-suggested by the company’s chairman Sir Robert Mclean. It was what he called his feisty daughter, Ann.

 

Everything else changed. The shape of the wings went straight to elliptical. Against all conventional thinking, he also made the wings thin rather than thick. A sliding cockpit canopy gave the pilot al-round vision while reducing drag.

 

A Rolls Royce Merlin engine completed the transformation, and it was the prototype -K5054 - that flew that day 70 years ago.

 

Twelve weeks later, the RAF had its first go in the new fighter; Flight Lieutenant Humphrey Edwardes-Jones took her up at Martlesham Heath, the test aerodrome in Suffolk. He almost crashed her.

A revolutionary aspect of the

 Spitfire

-were wheels that retracted into the wings when in flight to make her more aerodynamic. As he came in to land he almost forgot to drop the undercarriage, and only just recovered in time.

His verdict, telephoned to the Air Ministry was that the Spitfire was

 

‘delightful to handle’

 

-and would be easy for the pilots to learn to fly-as long as they remembered to put the wheels down! Eight days later, the Ministry ordered 310 at a cost of £1.25 million (£38m at today’s prices.)

 

It was Mitchell’s triumph - and with that over, he turned his attention for designing a better, faster bomber for the RAF.

But he ran out of time. In February 1937, in exasperation, he told a visitor:

 

‘I who have so much to do, have only until June.’

 

The next month he finally stopped work.

 

Characteristically, he worried that he was letting people down by not being able to finish the job he had started. Letters from colleagues high and low assured him

 

he had done far more than most.

 

He made one last effort to live, flying by private plane to a cutting edge cancer clinic in Vienna. The treatment did not work.

 

After five weeks the doctors sent him home to die. He sat in his garden, often with the local vicar, and in June, the month he predicted, he died.

 

‘I just felt numb,’ his son, then aged 16, recalled, ‘but I could comprehend that at least he was no longer in pain’

 

Meanwhile, the Spitfire, one of the greatest single-seater fighters of all time was on its way into mass production. The first of more than 20,000 rolled of the production lines in 1938.

 

It would be another two years before it’s

 

FINEST HOUR

 

With Hawker Hurricanes, the other British fighter plane, Spitfires soared over Southern England.

 

In the summer of 1940

as

CHURCHILL’S

Acclaimed

‘FEW’

-fought and won that crucial confrontation with the Luftwaffe.

 The Spitfires took on the enemy Messerschmitt fighters that protected the German bomber formations. The slower Hurricanes then moved in to down the defenceless bombers.

It was a joint victory, but in truth, it was the

 

SPITFIRE

 

-that made the crucial difference and for which

Reg Mitchell

 -remains a largely forgotten hero.

His son, now 85, feels certain his father’s death robbed Britain of yet more world-beating inventions. That bomber, the project he never finished was one example. He was designing it to fly at top speed of 360mph, 25 per cent faster than the Lancaster and the Wellington.

 

How much quicker might Bomber Command have got on top of the Luftwaffe, if its crews had been flying Reg Mitchell’s creation?

 

How much sooner might the war have been won?

 The greatest tragedy of Reg Mitchell’s death at such a sadly early age was that thousands of other lives that given the chance, he might also have saved.

* *

‘Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.’

 

Speech on the Battle of Britain-

August 1940

by

Winston Churchill.

* * *

 

ADAPTED from:

R. J. Mitchell:

Schooldays to Spitfire

by

Gordon Mitchell

 

Published by Tempus at £12.99

 

To order a copy, telephone 01453 883300.

 

Tony Rennell is a military historian-His latest book is

'Tail -End Charlies'

* * *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

MARCH/2006

 

*

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%? **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

H.F.1438

LITTLEJOHN

We need a fearless leader to deliver

BREXIT

- Nigel Farage:

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN believes the former Ukip leader should be an integral part of the process after campaigning for so long

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly

Enoch Powell said famously that all political careers end in failure. Nigel Farage should have proved him wrong.

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly.

Up to a point.

The magnificent Leave victory in 2016 was a vindication of Farage’s virtually single-handed campaign to get Britain out of the EU.

Yes, others can also take credit. But Farage was the figurehead, often a lone voice in the wilderness. 

No one had to endure the vilification and violence directed at Farage as he took his message around the country year after year, well before Call Me Dave finally buckled and gave the people a long-overdue referendum.

Fifteen years ago, when I was presenting a nightly show on Sky News, I was about the only broadcaster who would give him a regular platform. The mainstream media treated him as a pariah — at best a circus act, at worst a neo-Nazi. 

This was around the time that New Labour was almost unanimously agreed to have established a 1,000-year reich and opposition to our glorious future as a European statelet was considered futile.

Aside from a few principled players in the Conservative Party — former leader and one-time Maastricht rebel Iain Duncan Smith prominent among them — the political establishment wholeheartedly embraced the EU project. 

But Farage kept banging away, making mischief in Brussels, where he’d managed to get himself elected as an MEP and used his position to ridicule the pompous panjandrums running the show.

Who can forget his wonderful denunciation of the ridiculous Herman Van Rompuy, self-styled former European ‘president’?

‘You have the charisma of a damp rag, and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk . . . Who are you? I’d never heard of you. Nobody in Europe had ever heard of you.

‘I would like to ask you, President, who voted for you . . . oh, I know democracy’s not popular with you lot, and what mechanism do the people of Europe have to remove you?

‘Is this European democracy? You appear to have a loathing for the very concept of the existence of nation states — perhaps that’s because you come from Belgium, which of course is pretty much a non-country . . .

‘Sir, you have no legitimacy in this job at all, and I can say with confidence that I speak on behalf of the majority of British people in saying: We don’t know you, we don’t want you, and the sooner you’re put out to grass, the better.’

The Westminster bubble was horrified. How dare this upstart show such a lack of respect to our European masters? But out in the suburbs and the shires, and on the rundown council estates in the North of England, millions of decent British citizens gave a silent cheer.

Call Me Dave dismissed Farage’s Ukip as a collection of ‘fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists’. It was a cruel caricature, but partly accurate. Ukip’s annual conference certainly resembles a roomful of Hyacinth Buckets and men who model themselves on the Major in Fawlty Towers.

But Ukip was on a roll — and by now Farage was a ubiquitous presence in radio and TV studios, even if he was often only there as an Aunt Sally, to be shouted at by self-righteous presenters and panellists alike.

Yet Farage stood up to the verbal slings and arrows, and to the nasty physical abuse he frequently had to endure. Cigarette in one hand, pint of best in the other, he kept on plugging away.

In the 2015 General Election, Ukip polled almost four million votes, a large chunk of them in former Labour strongholds in the North, which felt ignored and abandoned and had suffered the greatest impact from mass immigration.

Farage’s ‘fruitcakes’ didn’t make a parliamentary breakthrough but they delivered the Tories their first Commons majority since 1992, simply by denying Labour seats they had taken for granted.

Now, Cameron feared, they were coming for the Tories, so he panicked and promised a referendum on EU membership. 

Say what you like about Call Me Dave, but this was his greatest gift to the people of Britain, an opportunity we seized, asserting our sovereignty and overturning the decades-old project of submerging our country into an anti-democratic United States of Europe.

 

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be

Cameron’s gamble backfired. He resigned immediately and is now reduced to scraping a living on the international lecture circuit, essentially a political end-of-the-pier show.

Next week, he’s playing a small town theatre in Florida, but has sold fewer seats than its current production, Million Dollar Quartet, a jukebox musical featuring hits by Johnny Cash, Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins and Jerry Lee Lewis.

In the States, where they value national independence, Farage is a folk hero, a bigger draw than our former Prime Minister.

And yet.

OK, so the referendum wouldn’t have been won without Boris, Gove and the brave career politicians who dared to defy the Establishment stitch-up. But without Farage, there would have been no referendum, nor would there have been any Brexit.

What kind of Brexit, if any, remains to be seen. Which, presumably, is why Farage is now muttering about making a comeback as part of a Ukip Mark II.

The corpse of the old Ukip is still twitching, but without Farage it’s nothing. The party’s on its third post-Farage leader, no one you’ve ever heard of, and he’s on the way out over a few incendiary tweets sent by some dopey bird half his age he’s got himself hooked up with. I can’t be bothered to go into details, because it’s a waste of time.

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be.

One of the reasons Ukip imploded was because those four million voters returned to the two main parties, both of which made manifesto promises to implement Brexit in full, yet now seem hell-bent on either reneging or watering it down so far it becomes meaningless.

So I understand and share Farage’s concern. As I’ve said all along, the fix has been in since the result of the referendum was announced. The political class have stolen our biggest vote in history for anything and made it all about them — not the people they are paid to serve.

Frankly, I don’t trust any of them to deliver the Brexit we voted for. If the vast majority of MPs had their way, they’d stop the whole process in its tracks today. When Theresa May succeeded Call Me Dave, she should have established a grand cross-party coalition to negotiate our departure, including heroic Labour figures such as Gisela Stuart and Kate Hoey.

But the central player should have been Farage, a man who knows his way around Brussels and scares the EU to death.

He’d never have put up with the contemptuous treatment being meted out to Britain by Michel Barnier and his ‘damp-rag, low-grade bank clerk’ bureaucrats.

Instead, we’re stuck with Mother Theresa, who spent the referendum hiding behind the sofa and still won’t say whether she’d vote Leave if it was held today.

Her new de facto deputy, David Lidington, is a full-on federast, already speculating we could rejoin the EU at some stage. Rejoin? We haven’t even left yet — and never will, other than in name only, if the political establishment prevails.

Even David Davis seems to have gone native and Boris has been banished to the outer darkness, certainly when it comes to Brexit. In what kind of Fred Karno government is the Foreign Secretary excluded from the biggest foreign policy issue facing the country in modern history?

Never mind Boris, though. Mrs May should be making plans for Nigel, bringing him into the fold, allowing him to be an integral part of the very Brexit process for which he has campaigned so long, so hard and so selflessly.

He doesn’t need a knighthood, or a sinecure in the Lords — each of which would have been a traditional reward for his service to this country. Given the fuss over Mrs Thatcher’s memorial, I suppose a statue in Parliament Square is out of the question, too.

But what is beyond doubt is that, after Thatcher, Farage is the most influential, most significant British political figure since Churchill — much more so than the Westminster pygmies and time-servers who treat him with unwarranted disdain.

Ukip, the party he led, may be sleeping with the fishes, but if there is any justice, Farage’s career deserves to end in triumph.

Let’s hope Enoch was wrong.

 


Read more:   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5300489/We-need-fearless-leader-deliver-Brexit-Nigel-Farage.html#ixzz55RBjzeYS

 

H.F.1460

[A REMINDER FROM 2010 TO THOSE REMAINERS WHO PUT PERSONAL CONSIDERATIONS BEFORE THAT OF LOYALTY TO CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY]

*

 

WHAT FREDERICK FORSYTH STATED:

 

ONCE WE ARE FREE OF THE EU THE WORLD IS OUR OYSTER

 

 

It HAD to come sooner or later and now it has happened. A major national newspaper, the Daily Express, has called for Britain to end its full membership of the European Union.

  Let us get two points clear.

 

1.   this does not mean severing our 1,000-year trading relationship with that continent.   trade is what we live by, always have.  Trade is what we were told 38 years ago was what would be freed and enhanced by joining the [EEC] European Economic Area.    Trade without tariffs, duties, taxes, protectionism and bureaucracy.

 

And we said YES.

 

We were lied to. 

HEATH

 lied to us.  They still do.  The EU of today and tomorrow

 

is not about trade

 

It is about the end of a nation state, replaced by a vast central governed empire.

For years this has been denied

 

Now it is very clearly out in the open.  But the huge majority of our people are deeply wedded to Old Blighty and refuse to abolish her by tricks and threat to become a devolved regional territory.

 

2.  Inside the European Economic Area like mega-rich Norway, we could trade and trade again with the EU and keep

our country, our laws, our justice system and our sovereignty.

 

And there are vast opportunities out there if only we had the nerve to face outwards not inwards.  Fifty-two nations of the Commonwealth want to increase trade, so does the Anglo-sphere: Ireland, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.  New giants are emerging: Brazil, India, China that make the EU look pathetic.

 

We must turn back to the open oceans whence our properity came. 

That world is growing, the Brussels world is shrinking slowly dying

 

But the [intended] EEA would suit us fine.

 

David Cameron complains about us "banging on about Europe"

You're wrong David.

 

We're banging on about Britain.

So should you.

 

Too many millions of us are sick and tired of endless capitulation.  We do not feel we are a free people any more

 

So listen to us. We want to be free of the thralldom of Brussels.

 

-DAILY EXPRESS-NOV26-2010

 

 

[Since the 'This England ' PETITION of 900,000 signatues increased to a million, to the Queen in 2004 by those indomitable PATRIOTS:   RON and NIGEL MCWHIRTER and JOHN GOURIET who died at their posts fighting to the end for OUR FREEDOM-OUR CONSTITUTION -OUR COUNTRY. We were priviledged to be in their company at the rear of Buckingham Palace when the PETITION was delivered.]

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

NOVEMBER 26,2010

 H.F.1438/1

DAILY  MAIL
comment
 

a decade on, has the city learned

nothing?

 

 

TEN years ago tonight, the BBC's Robert Preston broke the news that the Bank of England had been forced to step in to rescue Northern Rock from collapse, prompting endless queues to withdraw savings over the following days.

Though the authorities were slow to realise it, this was the first outward sign of

GREED-FED CANCER

infecting the entire financial system.

Indeed, it marked the start of an epic crisis whose consequences we all suffer today.

With businesses driven to the wall and taxpayers stung for massive bailouts, the

PUBLIC FINANCES

were laid to waste.

Borrowing soared to terrifying heights- and

DEBT

is still rising in

2017

Towards an unimaginable

£2 TRILLION

£2TRILLION.

Meanwhile, household incomes have been painfully squeezed, while savers and pension funds have been hammered by a decade of historically low interest rates.

Yet ten years on, no banker has been jailed for the sharp practice that brought this contry to the brink of ruin.

Extraordinary, nor has there been a

FULL ENQUIRY.

to establish

the lessons of the

 CRISIS.

(though after the comparatively footling scandal of voicemail hacking by rogue redtops, the Coalition had no hesitation in ordering one into the conduct sand ethics of the newspaper industry.

What is  so deeply worrying is that, even now, none of those lessons appears to have been learned. Indeed, there are abundant signs that the cancer is back.

As greedily as ever , bankers are inflating a DEBT BUBBLE-handing out excessive mortgages, cheep car loans and credit cards with

ZERO INTEREST

rates fixed for months.

Meanwhile, the old racket of trading bundles of sub-prime debt continues as if nothing untoward happened in 2007.

Now , as then, the banks have far too little capital in reserve to weather a

 STORM .

The difference is that in 2017, with taxpayers milked dry, the Government will be unable to mount anything like a similar bailout

[We prefer the word RESCUE. It is obvious that the banksters know something that the rest of the population do not know. A history of the City of London goes some way in explaining their unpatriotic and selfish and arrogant behaviour. They are not ENGLAND they are a financial DESPOT installed over 300 years ago by a SECRET SOCIETY - the cause and curse of much suffering here and of people's the world over. It is THE GREED CAPITAL of the WORLD -It is ALL for ITSELF  and NOTHING else MATTERS. IT IS A MAJOR DESTABILIZING BLOT ON THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND.]

The City must act now to shore up its defences. Otherwise, there can be no telling how the next crisis will end.

*  *  *

TRUE WEALTH- [PEACE OF MIND]

 

" There  is no wealth but life," he says, " life including all its powers of love, of joy, and of admiration.  That country is the richest which nourishes the greater number  of noble and happy human beings; that man  is the richest who, having perfected the helpful influence, both personal and by means of his possessions, over the lives of others,  A strange political economy; the only one, nevertheless, that ever was or can be: all political economy founded on self-interest being but the fulfilment of that which once brought schism into the Policy of the Angels and ruin into the Economy of Heaven."

JOHN RUSKIN (1812-1900 ) Eng,critic, essayist and social reformer.

 

The Rothschilds.


[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

SEPTEMBER 13-2017

H.F.1310

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

[AT LONG! LONG! LAST!

- WE LEAVE

THE

CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-GODLESS EU

 IN MARCH 2019.]

*

DAILY MAIL

-At last, Hammond's on board with

BREXIT

and the

REMOANERS are DEAD and BURIED

LEAVING THE EU

 IN

MARCH,2019

 

 

THE

DOMINIC

LAWSON

Column

 

 

Finally, it’s sorted. Until yesterday, the anti-Brexiteers known as Remoaners had high hopes of Philip Hammond, the Chancellor.

But yesterday he appeared as joint author of a newspaper article with the most adamantine Brexiteer in the Cabinet, the International Trade Secretary Dr Liam Fox. The two supposed foes declared that in March 2019, Britain would not just be leaving the EU but also ‘we will leave the Customs Union and be free to negotiate the best trade deals around the world as an independent, open, trading nation’.

Although the Cabinet Brexiteers were content with Hammond’s proposal that there should be a transition period after March 2019, pending a final settlement of the country’s arrangements with the EU, the Chancellor had given the impression he was bending to the demands of the CBI that Britain remain within the Customs Union during that unspecified period.

Blunder

This they regarded as a fatal blunder — and not just because they suspected the CBI (which had campaigned for Britain to give up sterling for the euro) of seeking to keep the UK in the EU ‘by the back door’.

As Shanker Singham, chairman of the special trade commission of the Legatum Institute (a group consulted regularly by the Government), warned last week: ‘The UK must be able to provide the clarity of being outside the Customs Union on Day 1 of Brexit.

If such clarity does not exist, then other countries will not think the UK is serious about executing an independent trade policy and they will quickly lose patience and move on.’...

...In any case, the nation has not changed its collective mind since the referendum in June 2016. If anything, views have hardened in the direction set by the result. A survey of 3,293 people published on Friday by the London School of Economics showed that even those who had voted ‘Remain’ would prefer the sort of Brexit deal the LSE’s team described as ‘hard’.

A total of 51.3 per cent of Remain voters backed a Brexit deal which delivered ‘full control’ over immigration and led to lower numbers of migrants from the EU. No fewer than 54.7 per cent of Remainers said that the UK should ‘pay nothing’ to the EU by means of a ‘divorce bill’.

And 52.2 per cent of Remainers told the LSE researchers that we should entirely free British law from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Unsurprisingly, a still higher proportion of self-identifying ‘Leave’ voters supported what the LSE termed

His statement on The Andrew Marr Show last month that failure to reach an amicable deal with the EU ‘would be a very, very bad outcome for Britain’ was seen as an attack on his Brexiteer colleagues in the Cabinet (and, indeed, on the Prime Minister).

hard Brexit’.

Monstrous

This clearly disappointed the most voluble critic of the Brexiteers on the Tory parliamentary benches, Anna Soubry. In her own newspaper article yesterday, she lamented ‘a sense of resignation among most people who voted Remain that we have to “man up” and make the most of what we know will be a rotten Brexit’...

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4787508/At-Hammond-s-board-Brexit.html#ixzz4pkbL1fqi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

[13 MONTHS

TO REGAIN OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

AUGUST 14, 2017

H.F.1281 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN!

-'WE ARE AFTER ALL AN INSULAR  ISLAND PEOPLE']

 

*

 

Even Remainers now back a

'hard' Brexit:

 Most Brits ... - Daily Mail

 

. Even Remainers now back a 'hard' Brexit: Most Brits want to regain full control ...
By Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail and Kate Ferguson For Mailonline ... a straight
choice between that and no deal, with 58 per cent backing it.

 

Most Brits want to regain full control of our borders and to become free of meddling EU judges, survey reveals

  • Most polled want the UK to become free of EU judges and full border control 

  • Two thirds said they would prefer 'no deal' rather than a soft Brexit, poll found

  • Findings boost for Theresa May who says no deal is better than a bad deal

Most Remain voters now back a Brexit that gives Britain a clean break from the EU and control back of our borders, a major study has found.

Many of those who voted to stay in the European Union also now believe the country should only pay a small ‘divorce bill’ and stop EU judges ruling over the UK.

The results are a major boost for Theresa May’s Brexit stategy - and suggest diehard Remainers, such as Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable and former prime minister Tony Blair, have overestimated support for backtracking on Brexit. 

Full artical


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782712/Most-Brits-hard-Brexit-new-survey-finds.html#ixzz4pXWhGZDU
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 FREEDOM!

 

.'..We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

Soul of England

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

WE HEAR THAT 80% OF CONSERVATIVE MPs ARE COMMITTED FRIENDS OF ISRAEL- DAILY MAIL THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 9,2017.

 WE HAVE ASKED ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS OVER THE PAST WHY OUR GOVERNMENTS WERE NOT

FRIENDS OF ENGLAND

BECAUSE IT HAS TAKEN 45 YEARS SINCE WE VOTED NO! IN 1975 FOR THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHO LIED ABOUT OUR TRUE COMMITMENT TO HITLER'S PLAN DOMINANCE OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE.

TO HAVE A REFERENDUM AND ONLY WHEN THE ELITE TORIES THOUGHT IT WOULD GO THEIR WAY TO A DEEPER ENMESHMENT INTO THE EU SUPER-STATE. THEY MISJUDGED THE TRUE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND-AS IT WAS SHE WHO SAVED THE UNION.

WE CAN HOPE NO BETTER WITH THE LABOUR PARTY WITH THEIR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL BODY THOUGH DECRIED MUCH LATELY IS STILL IN ACTION . ALAS! THE TRUE LABOUR PARTY OF THE SHIRES DIED DECADES AGO AS WITNESSED BY THE HUGE BREXIT VOTE.

OUR SUPPOSED CLOSEST ALLY THE USA WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN OUR ENTERING THE EU TO GIVE GERMANY A HAND .IT IS COMPLETELY UNDER THE ISRAELI LOBBY-HAS BEEN FOR OVER A HUNDRED YEARS.

AS WE HAVE STATED OUR GOVERNMENT SHOULD ENDEAVOUR TO BE ON FRIENDLY RELATIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTS -AS

WINSTON CHURCHILL

HAD STATED MOST VOCIFEROUSLY IN THE PAST:

 JAW JAW NOT WAR WAR!

News for DAILY MAIL-OUT OF THE SHADOWS THE POWERFUL FIXER BEHIND HER DOWNFALL by Andrew Pierce


Daily Mail
Andrew Pierce profiles the influential Lord Polak
Daily Mail - 13 hours ago
Out of the shadows, the powerful fixer behind Priti Patel's downfall: ANDREW
PIERCE profiles ... By Andrew Pierce for the Daily Mail ... He was also with her in
the two further undisclosed meetings in New York and Parliament 
 

 

[As on many other occasions over the past decades when we have shown details of Israeli intelligence and the connection with F O I . we have received many visits from their obedient servants who do not hide their NATIONAL identity.

 But this is ENGLAND

and such individuals should know their place and do their work without waving their FLAG!-MI5 need to keep them in place or is there nothing they can do-or must it be as CS1 WHERE ISRAEL REIGNS?]

 

 

JEW WATCH

 

 

 

H.F.1373 FRIENDS TO ALL- BUT COMMITTED TO NONE!

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 

 

Daily Mail

 

 

 

Police tap media phones and PM tries to get editor sacked -by Stephen Glover- Daily Mail

 

POLICE TAPPING JOURNALISTS' PHONES, A PM TRYING TO GET AN EDITOR SACKED. NO, NOT RUSSIA...BRITAIN

 

...Like most people, I suspect when I was young I used to trust in the fair-play , fundamental decency, moderation and good sense of the police and other official bodies. I no longer do.

How could one after all that has happened?

I no longer think the authorities generally believe in the

RIGHT OF THE PRESS

 to freely report without fear or favour, though of course there are exceptions. As the State ever bigger and more intrusive, its tendency to conceal acts of injustice or its own sheer ineptitude grows stronger.

Which brings me to the second instance of gross interference. On Tuesday,31st January,BBC2's Newsnight broadcast an item alleging that during the EU referendum campaign

DAVID CAMERON

tried to secure the dismissal of the Editor of this newspaper, because of his stance on

BREXIT.

According to the item, Mr Cameron fruitlessly attempted to persuade the Mail's proprietor

LORD ROTHERMERE

that its Editor should go lest this newspaper's pro-Leave sentiments de-rail the Prime Minister's  ambition for Britain to stay in the EU...

But  let us not get too tangled up with the personalities involved.  It is surely deeply troubling that any British prime minister should scheme to remove an editor with whom he disagrees. In Turkey, President Erdogan, will send his heavies to a newspaper office, or he will arrest editors and journalists he doesn't like. That's what happens in many countries we like to think of as crude or uncivilised , including

RUSSIA and CHINA.

We imagine things are done differently here, but isn't it really a question of style? David Cameron is smooth and sleek and has good manners-not a risible thug such as Erdogan or Putin who will send in the bully-boys.

Yet I know that while Opposition leader he secured his dismissal of a highly critical columnist from a national paper, and later conspired to get rid of another. Now we discover he strove unsuccessfully to

FINISH OFF AN EDITOR WHO DARED TO STAND IN HIS WAY...

Full article!

 

[Some time ago we expressed our opinion that David Cameron was a perfect example of a chameleon - an inconstant person-unpredictable...This was bound to happen in a country such as England which had forgotten its roots-its history -its culture-its priceless inheritance - until the 23rd June 2016. It's association over 44 years with the undemocratic-unaccountable-power-hungry elite of the European Union had almost destroyed its once NATIONAL SPIRIT and INTEGRITY passed on from previous ages. In the nick of time the PEOPLE awoke from their complacent slumber and asked for THEIR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT COUNTRY-BACK!

 

 

FEBRUARY 2 - 2017

H.F.1102  AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM - AWAITS-

Boys will be boys as the Year of the Cock starts and war looms on the horizon

The war drums are beating as the testosterone laden Year of the Cock (Rooster) begins and the boys get ready to show who is biggest and baddest. The biggest warnings are coming from China, which has seen many of its “red lines” crossed, at least verbally, by the macho-laden administration of US President Donald Trump. The fireworks could begin after February 5th as the Chinese New Year’s holidays wind down, Chinese intelligence and secret society sources say. As the Chinese have warned, if they make a move it will be “unexpected and worse than you can imagine.”

The Trump administration, meanwhile has been too preoccupied with redrawing the maps of the Middle East and dealing with ongoing power struggle in the West to fully appreciate what will happen if China makes a military move.

Before getting back to what China could do, let us take a look at the new Middle East that is being created by the Trump administration acting in unison with Russia. What we see is the region being divided into three spheres of influence. One is Turkey with expanded zones of influence penetrating Syria and Iraq. The other is the Persian (Iranian) empire now extending into Iraq, central Syria and Lebanon. The third is the Arab zone, including Egypt, the Gulf States, Sunni parts of Iraq, Jordan and Israel. Militarily the Russians and Americans have divided their spheres of influence with Russia to the East of the Euphrates and the US to the West. The map below shows the new zones of influence in Syria.
 

mapofmideast


As many seasoned observers have noted, Trump has promised to destroy ISIS within a month even as he promises undivided support to Israel, the main sponsor of ISIS. What is really happening is that the Saudi monarchy is going to take on the fundamentalist Wahab clergy (who they secretly hate) while the Israelis will deal with fundamentalist Zionist fanatics, which are two sides of the same ISIS coin. The reward for doing this will be survival for the gulf monarchies and new pipeline routes for their gas exports to Europe via Israel and Turkey. 

For the Trump regime, fixing the Middle East will be the easy part. Trump has announced he also plans to take on the hard part, dealing with the Federal Reserve Board, by hanging of portrait of Rothschild (Fed) nemesis Andrew Jackson in the White House, Pentagon sources note. This is not something the US military government will be able to solve merely by marching into Fed headquarters and rounding up central bankers or even by bumping off members of the Rothschild family. It will rather involve dealing with China.

Here is how a source close to the Rothschilds described the situation. “The Rothschilds are embedded in China, and have been for many years. All of their gold and liquid assets are in China…Everything that happens is well thought out and planned long in advance.”

Chinese intelligence agency and secret society sources told representatives of the White Dragon Society last week that if China decided to move military it would...

 

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

 

Now that Trump is president the real horse trading begins

Now that the Trump regime has formally been installed, the real battle over the future of the planet ...

 

H.F.1093 FREEDOM NOW

  DAILY MAIL-

COMMENT-

 

This paper is no great admirer of Trump...

 

 

 

This paper is no great admirer of Trump. But to all his hysterical critics we say: Oh! do calm down!

 

 

 

LET the Mail lay its cards on the table: we have never been a great admirer of Donald Trump. Though we agree with some of the things he has said and done, we have strong reservations about his style of politics. WE find many of his pronouncements and policies misguided-and a few frankly distasteful.

But like it or not, he is the democratically elected President of our greatest and most powerful ally, who has deep affection for our country. A strong supporter of

BREXIT

, he has said repeatedly that he wants to strengthen America's links with us and see us prosper after we

WITHDRAW FROM THE EU

But clearly, the massed ranks of our liberal elites and their sheep-like followers have other ideas. For they have made it plain that they would rather see Britain risk its security and be reduced to penury than do business with, let alone show friendship to, a US, led by a man with whom they viscerally disagree and paint as a monster.

Indeed, their hysterical reaction to Mr Trump's executive order restricting immigration from seven mostly Islamic countries has been wildly over the top, making the brash President himself look positively restrained by comparison.

Yes, there are respectable arguments to be made against his order and the way it has been implemented. AS nobody can deny. It has thrown airports into chaos and caused acute inconvenience, uncertainty and distress to many travellers who pose no threat whatever to America.

But it is blatantly false to suggest that this is a racist measure, directed against all followers of the

ISLAMIC FAITH

Indeed,, the overwhelming majority of the world's Muslims

REMAIN FREE AS EVER

to travel to the U.S.

Furthermore, the list of those on whom restrictions have been imposed was drawn up under

PRESIDENT OBAMA

who was  also notably slow in giving sanctuary to

SYRIAN REFEGEES.

This paper does not recall the LEFT accusing

HIM OF RACISM

-or, incidentally , attacking those nations that refuse entry to travellers with Israeli stamps in their passports...

 

Full article

 

*  *  *

[In England it has been estimated that at least 60% of Muslims in England-approximately 1,800,000 will never integrate into our society and there is no evidence that the Government is doing much about this vital matter because of political correctness- AS now is happening in a number of countries-those who now enter a country must sign a commitment to INTEGRATE and should they NOT DO SO-they are deported back to their country of origin.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

FEBRUARY 1 , 2017

 

H.F.1103 FREEDOM- AWAITS!

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

 

 -PART 1

*

 

IS THERE SUCH A THING AS NATIONAL CHARACTER?

 

We assume that, and it has lately been convenient for us to defend the very doubtful thesis that every society which has enough of a distinct tradition to be called a character, has a natural right to political independence and what is called in the jargon of the hour self –determination.

 

It is plain that we cannot answer our question till we have decided what constitutes nationality.  In my brief discussion of this question I wish to acknowledge a debt to Mr. Delisle Burns.

 

John Stuart Mills says that any portion of mankind may be said to constitute a nationality if they are united among themselves by common sympathies which do not exist between them and any others, and which make them co-operate with each other more willingly than with other people. It is further necessary that they should desire to be under the same government, and that it should be government by themselves or a portion of themselves.  This definition, as Mr Burns says, would partly apply to almost any group, and partly only to an ideal society.

 

Professor McDougall, though with caution and some reserves, accepts the theory of a race spirit, or group consciousness, which is not merely the sum or resultant of individual consciousness.  This theory, which is held by many modern philosophers and psychologists, seems to me to involve an introduction of mysticism where it is least appropriate; but it is not necessary to argue the matter here.

He is on firmer ground when he says the national characteristics are in the main the expressions of different traditions.  The importance of tradition is worth emphasing. Renan too says,

 

“that which causes men to form a people is the recollection of great things which they have done together, and the will to accomplish new things.”

 

Thus he adds a common ideal, as equally important with common memories.  A nation, says another writer, is any group, which feels itself to be a nation – a definition which favours those fissiparous movements, which in our time have broken up several larger aggregates (1926)

 

However, as a rule we think we know what a nation means and we are ready with thumb-nail sketches of our neighbours, and even of ourselves.  We think of the Scot as canny, thrifty, fond of metaphysics and controversial theology, and perhaps slow to understand a joke.

 

This description may apply to the Lowlander, and to his near kinsman the north-country Englishman; it clearly does not suit the Highlander.

 

We think of the Jew as keen in money-making, fond of display if rich, and adverse to physical exertion.

 

We remember that the Romans found the Frenchmen of their day studious of the military art and of witty conversation; the modern Frenchman, we say, still exhibits those characteristics.  Rank was strongly of this opinion.

 

“Ambitious, warlike, incited by national pride, the French have kept their neighbours in constant excitement, sometimes liberating the oppressed, more often oppressing the free”

 

We are ready to describe the typical Spaniard, the typical German, and the typical American.

 

For ourselves we have the portly and good-natured John Bull, who in a cartoon, which moved Ruskin’s wrath, is represented as “guarding his pudding.”

 

OUR CHARCTERISTICS, we say, are a love of LIBERTY, JUSTICE, and DUTY (so Bishop Creighton has it); we are honest but dull and stupid, for which reason we are frequently outwitted by the nimbler intellects of our rivals [hence our present perilous situation we find ourselves in 2006 –which also had the help of our own traitors within]

 

Foreign nations do not seem to admit either our superior high-mindedness or our stupidity; but they grant us great tenacity. ENGLAND, the French say, is the country of WILL.

 

These judgements are mostly very crude. Circumstances have much to do with the impression that a country makes abroad.  Napoleon called the English a nation of shopkeepers, which is very inappropriate, for the English have never been good shopkeepers.

 

They have excelled in manufactures and commerce, but not in shop-keeping, which demands a more rigid care for the pence than is often found among Anglo-Saxons.

 

A ruling class may represent a country abroad and may there display the qualities which foreigners come to regard a characteristic of the nation as a whole, whereas in reality the masses have habits and ideals unlike those of the oligarths.

 

A nation governed by an aristocracy may seem to be high-spirited, warlike, and contemptuous of trade and manual work; when the middle class is in power the same nation may appear pacific and fond of money; under universal suffrage it may say display very different characteristics.

 

Besides all this, foreign conquest, emigration and immigration, and a differential birth-rate, may produce great changes in what is called national character.

[As we can see in the early years of the 21st century under Tony Blair]

For instance, the conquest of a country by Nordic invaders may add to the population those enterprising and restless qualities, which belong to that race, and subsequently the submergence of the Nordics by another race, such as the Alpine, may give the nation the quality of stubborn tenacity in place of the chivalrous and adventurous disposition, which formerly distinguished it.

 

Writers like Mr Lothrop Stoddard, who attach great and probably excessive importance to these racial characteristics, think that the French nation has become more “Alpine” both in blood and character since the Middle Ages.

 

Certainly the behaviour of the soldiers in the Great War belied the traditional opinions about the qualities of French and English.

 

The joviality and irrepressible gaiety of the British was contrasted with the tenacity and grimness of the French soldiery. Lastly, besides class differences, and changes from one period to another, there are provincial peculiarities, which may be important.  Even within a compact nation there may be great local difference, which cannot escape the notice of a travelling stranger.  In Spain, for example. The Galician is unlike the Andalusian, and the Catalan quite different from both.

 

These considerations may prevent us following those writers who have romantically assigned fixed characters to the nations of Europe.

 

But in spite of this, I think we may venture to claim certain qualities as characteristics of the

 

ENGLISH PEOPLE

 

-without attempting to decide whether they are racial, or due to our geographical position, our history, or our traditions.

 

Since the days of the Saxons and Vikings, the English temper has been the temper of an independent, free-spoken people [Until Blairdom arrived in 1997] –who in ordinary times are refractory to discipline and impatient of restraint, each man feeling himself fit to rule; but in times of danger ready to combine, to form

 

VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS

 

- to obey the commanders whom they have chosen, and to trust them until they have proved themselves incompetent [as in Iraq since 2003] 

 

Fifteen hundred years ago Sidonius Appollinaris describes the Saxons he had seen them – ferocious barbarians, their faces painted blue, their long hair falling over their foreheads; shy and awkward among courtiers, but turbulent and animated among their ships.

 

“One would think” he says, “that each oarsman was himself the arch-pirate.”

 

We can trace this independent spirit all through our early history, till the time came to break entirely with the medieval theory of politics both in CHURCH and STATE.

 

The rulers of the land the defiantly proclaimed that

 

“ the English Church hath always been thought, and is at this hour, sufficient and meet of itself, without the intermeddling of any exterior persons, to administer its own affairs and duties.”

 Similarly in secular matters,

 

“By sundry old authorities, histories and chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this

REALM of ENGLAND

Is

An EMPIRE.

 

-That is, a

 

 SOVEREIGN INDEPENDENT NATION

 

“and so hath been accepted in the WORLD, governed by one SUPREME HEAD and KING having dignity and royal estate of the imperial CROWN of the same.”

Among the various early descriptions of the national character we may select that of Andrea Trevisano, Venetian Ambassador in 1497.

 

“ The English are great lovers of themselves and everything belonging to them.  They think that there are no other men like themselves, and no other world but England; and whenever they see a handsome foreigner, they say that he looks like an Englishman; and when they set any delicacy before a foreigner they ask him if such a thing is made in his country.”

 

Count Magalotti, who accompanied Cosmo de Medici on a visit to Charles II in 1669, finds the English

 

“are by nature proud and phlegmatic in their behaviour, so that they never hurry those who work for them by an indiscreet impatience, but suffer them to go at their own pleasure and according to their ability.  This proceeds from their melancholy temperament, for which those who live in the north are more remarkable than those who live in the south, the former being saturnine and the latter more lively.  

 

They consider a long time before they come to a determination, but having once decided, their resolution is irrevocable, and they maintain their opinion with the greatest obstinacy.  The English are men of a handsome countenance and shape, and of an agreeable complexion, which they owe to their climate and to the salubrity of the air, and to their use of beer rather than wine. They are of a most manly spirit, and valiant even to rashness in war both by land and sea.”…

 

*

[What a right moment to close our

 

Part I

 

disclosure of

 

THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

Taken from

 ENGLAND

by

WILLIAM RALPH INGE

 Published by

 HODDER AND STOUGHTON

–1926 and 1938]

 

*          *          *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used –comments in brackets]

APRIL/06

ADDED MARCH 2-2018

In March 2018 we are but 12 month's from retrieving our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION OF ENGLAND from HITLER'S PLAN for GERMAN DOMINATION OF EUROPE AND ENGLAND IN THE PEACE.  WE have over decades described the ENGLISH as INSULAR PEOPLE with their "individual character" jealous of their once accustomed freedom, law and custom to be returned intact, unless TREASON  raises its head in the once hallowed HOUSE of the NATION. The Greek People share the "individual character" of the English People but will not see that FREEDOM which our nation secured  for THEM  over a century and more ago but ENGLAND can intercede on behalf of ALL captive nations in Europe when

ENGLAND IS FREE.

It is stated that we owe our position as a Great Power to our geographical position and [hopefully] to our comparative freedom from continental entanglements which should be in place when we LEAVE the EU in MARCH 2019.

Our greatest weakness is selling off the FAMILY SILVER or to be more precise the

BEST OF BRITISH

As the inventive spirit and success and valuable and vital power resources belong to

THE PEOPLE OF BRITAIN.

NOT TO THE GREEDY

 SQUARE MILE

OR

FOREIGN NATIONS.

H.F.1488          Brought-Forward from April-2006

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND FRAUD WHICH UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

A REMINDER!

 Brought Forward from JUNE 15,2008

The Dirty Little Secret Is That Our MPs Hardly Matter Any More

 

by

 

THE

Melanie

Phillips

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-Monday, June 9,2008]

CUP YOUR ears, What is that sound we are suddenly picking up on the bush telegraph?

[PANIC]

It is the distant but unmistakable trumpeting of the elephant in the room. And the name of that most dangerous but lamentably unscrutinised animal is the

EUROPEAN UNION.

The EU is the issue that all politicians are ignoring in the hope we will forget about it.  Most immediately, they hope we have forgotten to be concerned about the

EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION

which is masquerading as a bog-standard treaty over which we need lose no sleep.

 

This constitution, which would bring into being a

SUPER-STATE

and end once and for all what remains of the

INDEPENDENCE

OF

EU MEMBER STATES

was dumped after it was rejected by

FRENCH and DUTCH

voters

in

2005.

It was then resurrected in all but name as the

TREATY of LISBON

which

PARLIAMENT

is in the process of ratifying.

This week, that

CONSTITUTION

faces a triple test.

Today, businessman Stuart Wheeler's legal challenge to Labour's refusal to honour its

MANIFESTO PLEDGE

to put it to a

REFERENDUM

reaches the

HIGH COURT.

On Wednesday , the ratification Bill reaches the

HOUSE OF LORDS.

This Bill was ruthlessly shoe-horned through the

COMMONS

This week we will see whether their Lordships will also spinelessly roll over, or recall their historic role as the last-ditch defence of this country's interests against

SUCH ABUSE OF POWER.

 

PANIC

But something else is happening which our politicians didn't bargain for. As we know, the constitution has to be approved by every member state or else it falls. On

THURSDAY 12th JUNE,2008

IRELAND VOTES ON THE TREATY

-and it looks as if

IT MIGHT VOTE AGAINST IT.

[IT DID]

The Irish government is filled with panic and horror at the possibility that the Irish public might actually be thinking for themselves. For the EU has always relied on bamboozling the public about the joys of EUtopia and terrifying them that their whole world will collapse if it is thwarted.

More and more people, however, are realising that they have lied to, not only about the constitution but about the whole EU project.  In Britain we were told from the start that it was only an economic union which would entail no loss of sovereignty.

THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF THE TRUTH

The dirty little secret is that, even without the constitution, political power has simply drained away to Brussels.

 a little-noticed but quite devastating speech in the Commons last week, the Tory MP Peter Lilly recorded that last year the EU passed no fewer than

177 directives

-more or less equivalent to our

ACTS OF PARLIAMENT

and

2,033 regulations

enforceable in the UK, as well as making

1,045 decisions

WHICH AFFECT US.

Our own Trade Minister has admitted that around half of all UK legislation with an impact on business, charities and the voluntary sector stems from laws passed in

BRUSSELS.

Once these powers have been transferred to the EU, observed Mr Lilly, ministers engage 'in a charade of pretence that they retain those powers and often end up 'nobly accepting responsibility for laws which they actually opposed in

BRUSSELS.

Is it any wonder that so many are terminally disillusioned with the entire political process when

politicians make promises

which they are simply powerless to keep -a fact which

 they carefully conceal.

Now the former Tory policy adviser Lord Blackwell is arguing that Britain should renegotiate the

TERMS OF EU MEMBERSHIP

restricting it to

TRADE AGREEMENTS

COMMON SECURITY

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES

BUT REJECTING

EU CONTROL

OVER

MONETARY POLICY

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

DEFENCE

AND

JUSTICE.

 An opinion poll run by his group

GLOBAL VISION

suggests that more than a third of voters across all parties would back a prospective

CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT

pledge to negotiate such a change, and that people would support it in a

REFERENDUM

MORE than TWO to ONE.

 

CORRUPTING

The fact is that those opposed to the creation of a

EUROPEAN SUPER-STATE

are not

'xenophobes'

or

'Little Englanders'

of the overheated Eurofanatic imagination.

On the contrary many Eurosceptics like their European neighbours and find much to admire in their culture. They merely want to carry on governing themselves in their own country -because they have an enduring attachment to

DEMOCRACY

And the EU is fundamentally an anti-democratic project, based on the belief that the individual nation is the source of the ills of the world and that by contrast supra-national institutions offer the solution to all its problems.

It is that absence of democratic transparency which is now corrupting not just

EUROPEAN POLITICS

BUT

OUR OWN.

The fresh outbreak of

 'Tory  sleaze'

 over the

EXPENCES GRAVY TRAIN

is rooted in

BRUSSELS

where corruption is the accepted way of

EU life.

Yesterday the Irish government said that a 'NO' vote over the

EU CONSTITUTION

would be a crisis for

EUROPE.

WHAT RUBBISH!

The plain fact is that the EU has brought about a crisis for

DEMOCRACY within EUROPE

WHICH IS WHY WE SHOULD RE-NEGOTIATE OUR PLACE

WITHIN IT.

Politicians, however, run a mile from any such suggestion. The terror of acknowledging the

TRUE NATURE

of what has happened, in case he is required to address it, has propelled David Cameron into a cul-de sac.

[With regard to the political intentions of David Cameron we have always believed that he was an EU 'sleeper ' in the wings ready to take over if Tony Blair needed replacement. That is why it has been impossible to get any concrete assurances as regard renegotiating the

LISBON TREATY

We would like to be proved wrong about our suspicions but up to now we can see no reason to change our minds.]

His pledge to allow the British people a vote on the constitution is worthless since -as he has only now admitted explicitly -once the treaty is ratified it will be almost impossible to do anything about it.

But since his party has warned that the

EU CONSTITUTION

will spell the end of

BRITISH SELF-GOVERNMENT

this turns Mr Cameron into the Hamlet of the European debate - an awesome talent for speeches denouncing

TYRANNY

but a complete inability to act against it.

Mr Cameron is paralysed by fear of reigniting the Tories' internal civil war over

EUROPE

But the Tory Europhiles are now moth-eaten has-beens who have lost the argument with the

BRITISH PEOPLE.

 

Opportunist

The fact is that Parliament is now so emasculated it is becoming the equivalent of Westminster regional council in the

REPUBLIC of EUROLAND.

Why , therefore, should we bother to vote for politicians who will have

NO POWER

except to do the bidding of the Brussels bureaucrats imposing their

UNDEMOCRATIC RULE

over the

BRITISH PEOPLE?

IT IS TIME TO END THIS CHARADE.

Whatever happens to the

CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY

in

IRELAND

or

ANYWHERE ELSE

BRITAIN MUST NOW RENEGOTIATE ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE EU

The politician who does so will be a

HERO to the NATION

Which is why Mr Cameron should ignore the faint-hearts and sued -shod Eurofanatics in his ranks.

THIS COUNTRY MUST REDISCOVER ITS

IDENTITY

AND

SENSE OF PURPOSE

OR ELSE

IT IS FINISHED.

IT CAN ONLY DO SO IF IT REGAINS THE POWER

TO RULE ITSELF.

The issue is quite simply whether 

DEMOCRACY in BRITAIN

 has a future at all. It could not be more fundamental

If Mr Cameron were to say he would renegotiate Britain's place in Europe, he would silence all the mutterings that he is a blank page, an opportunist, a follower rather than

A LEADER.

He would immediately establish himself instead as a

STATESMAN of the FIRST RANK

Come on, Mr Cameron: the PEOPLE would not only be with you, but are simply desperate to hear a politician say that he will fight to preserve what so many of our fellow citizens down through the centuries have

DIED TO DEFEND.

*

[This essay was as usual no disappointment to us who have followed the work of Melanie Phillips for a number of years and never disappointed with her assessment on any subject under the sun. This article was timely and no doubt it would have had many dithers as to the future of Europe decide that a

 FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

is better for the world than the Undemocratic super -state which as history has shown are doomed to failure as we have who witnessed the Blitz in our childhood have observed since .

We thank again Melanie Phillips and the Daily Mail for  such a timely call to arms which was answered by the majority of voters in Ireland for a DEMOCRATIC EUROPE of a Family of Free Nation States for the betterment of EUROPE and the WORLD.]

 

[Font altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

THE TREATY OF TREASON

*

ALMOST EVERYTHING THAT IS MOST PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL STATES

*

Empires Have Gone And Most People Now Live In Nation States-said Lord Shore.

 

*

A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk than at any time in it's over a Thousand Years of History.

*

Nor Shall My Sword

*

Don't Let Them Destroy Our Identity

*

WHY can't we have the right to be English

*

Why Are We English Made To Feel Guilty

*

The Soul of England

*

 

The Spirit of England

*

The Queen and EU Constitution

*

Thoughts on St George's Day -Who are the English

Letter from Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, to Edward Heath, prior to the acceptance by Parliament of the "Treaty of Rome"1972.

*

What History Tells us About Our History with the CONTINENT.

*

I Say We Must Not Join Europe-Field Marshall Viscount Montgomery.

*

Could England Survive Outside Europe?-YES!

*

The Truth About A Federal Europe

*

Our Basic Liberties And Freedoms -To Be Surrendered To A Foreign Power.

*

The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution For Europe.

*

The Rotten Heart Of Europe by Bernard Connolly.

*

[There Are Hundreds Of Bulletins Of A Similar Vein In Our

 Bulletin File

 

Thank You for Calling!

 

Glad to be back! -Our Website has been down since the 18th May because our server had been victim to a hacker. For a time however some items from 2007 were shown for a short period. This attack supports our contention that some do not like our frank comments about the EU and  proves we are doing our duty to pass the information to the general public to decide.

 

JUNE 15-2008

 

*

H.F.1491-Brought Forward from JUNE 15,2008

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

 

BRITAIN AND EUROPE

The Culture of Deceit

by

Christopher Booker

 

*

PART  3

HEATH and 1970

[The Great Conspiracy]

 By the time Mr Heath came to launch his own, successful application to 'enter Europe' in 1970, he was already well versed in how to pretend that it was something other than what it was. Over the next five years, up to the time of the referendum in 1975, Parliament and the British people were incessantly assured that entry into the Common Market was simply a matter of trade and jobs, in no way would the British way of life be changed or Britain's right to srun her own affairs curtailed.

[At the referendum  In 1975 we voted NO!]

An oft-quoted line from Mr Heath's White Paper circulated to every household in the country in June 1971 promised

'there is no question of Britain losing essential sovereignty".

This from the same man who before his death in 2005 admitted to the British people that he had lied because he believed it was what should happen .He failed to let them know that he  Rippon and others were Nazi-spys since 1938-detailed HERE!

In a television broadcast to mark Britain's entry in January 1973, Heath said:

"there are some in this country who fear that in going into Europe we shall in some way sacrifice independence and sovereignty.  These fears, I need hardly say, are completely injustified"

YET SHORTLY AFTER Parliament had approved British entry, word came from Paris that President Pompidou was proposing that member states should make a solemn commitment to

"move irrevocably to economic and monetary union by 1980".

This made a complete mockery of all the assurances given to Parliament that any plans for monetary union had been dropped.  In a BBC documentary series The Poisoned Chalice in 1996, Sir Douglas-Home looking askance at the news. He said to Heath

"the House isn't going to like this"."But that" Denman recalled Heath replying, "is what it's all about". When Heath himself was asked by the BBC whether he could really have said such a thing, his only response, after an unsmiling pause, was

 "well, that's what it was about"..

Another revealing measure of how deeply the

CULTURE OF DECEIT

had now set in was the curious story of the common fisheries policy, and the Heath Government's response to the crude ambush set up by the Six to ensure that, as part of 

THE PRICE OF ENTRY

the four applicant countries Britain, Iceland, Denmark and Norway, would have to hand over to the community their fishing waters, the richest in the world. (all documents cited on the CFP are from PRO files in FO [FOREIGN OFFICE] 30/656-9)

On the very day the applications went in, June 30 1970, the Six hastily approved the principle that member-states should be given "equal access" to each other's fishing waters, under Brussels control. The point was that, because this had now become part of the acquis communautairte, the body of existing Community law, ythe applicant countries would have to accept a fait accompli. Within a few years, as everyone knew, national fishing waters were due to be extended out under international law to 200 miles. Because the waters belonging to the four applicants states would then contain most of the fish in European waters, this would give the SIX an astonishing prize.

In fact the Six knew that their new fisheries policy

WAS NOT LEGAL.

Among Foreign Office papers released in 2001 was an internal Council of Ministers document, dating from June 1970, which shows how desperate the Brussels lawyers had been to find some article in the

TREATY of ROME

 which could be used to authorise such a policy.

THERE WERE NONE.

The policy therefore had

NO LEGAL JUSTIFICATION,

and other papers show that the

'FOREIGN OFFICE'

KNEW THIS TOO.

[Since the sixties under Macmillan and Heath and since with the late exception of Margaret Thatcher who paid for her late conversion with 'NO!-NO!-NO! to closer union the so-called British Foreign Office was and still is with David Cameron in reality under the control of  BRUSSELS.]

But so determined was Mr Heath not to offend his prospective new partners that he decided

NOT TO CHALLENGE [THE LEGALITY OF] THEM.

Britain would simply accept the

ILLEGAL NEW FISHERIES POLICY

even though this would mean handing over

ONE OF THE GREATEST RENEWABLE ASSETS AND WOULD SPELL DISASTER FOR A LARGE PART OF HER FISHING FLEET.

Gradually the British fishermen got the idea that they were about to be

SACRIFICED

and in the closing months of 1970 various MPs for fishing constituences wrote to ministers asking what on earth was going on. They were fobbed off with evasive replies. In deed, as the recently released papers show

[ In 2001 under the 30 year rule-Public Records Office-Kew- re Heath's application to join the supposed Common Market but really a

politically based Super-state

 to be known as the

 European Union.

civil servants eventually worked out a careful form of words

[As they will  in February 2016]

intended to to reassure the fishermen that

'" proper account would be taken of their interests".

BUT

behind the scenes,

as a Scottish Office memo put it on November 9-1970

ministers were being told how important it was -not to get drawn into detailed explanations of just what problems might lie ahead for the fishermen because,

"in a wider UK context, they must be regarded as expendable."

 

The following year the White Paper promised that Britain would not sign an ACCESSION TREATY until the Common Market's fisheries policy was changed. Geoffrey Ribbon [a Nazi Spy  with Edward Heath and Roy Jenkins recruited by German (Nazi) intelligence part of of a spy cell in Balliol College in 1938-reported to MI5 by the MASTER

A. D. LINDSAY]

Rippon repeated this PROMISE to PARLIAMENT and to the TORY PARTY Conference.

But in November Mr Heath realised that time was running out.  Unless he accepted the fishing policy as it stood, his plans for Britain's entry in January 1973 would have to be abandoned.

He instructed Rippon to give way, and when Rippon was questioned about this in the House of Commons on December 13, 1972

HE ANSWERED WITH A STRAIGHT LIE.

He claimed Britain had retained complete control over the waters round her coastline, knowing that this was simply

NOT TRUE.

So barefaced was this

DECEIT

over fishing rights that successive government and fisheries ministers would continue to obfuscate the truth.

[TELL DAMN LIES]

of what had been done for the next

THREE DECADES

In June 1975, the month when inflation hit 27 percent,

ITS HIGHEST LEVEL IN HISTORY

came the

REFERENDUM

Surropunded by all the evidence of a

MAJOR ECONOMIC CRISIS,

[THE GREATLY MISLED AND LIED TO]

BRITISH PEOPLE

VOTED BY 2 to 1

TO REMAIN IN A

[SUPPOSED]

"COMMON MARKET"

which the vast majority believed was intended to be no more than a free-trading area arrangement'

The supporters of the YES! campaign, including the leaderships of all  three political parties [AS again in 2016] did little to disillusion them.  The message was that a 'YES' vote was all about protecting jobs [As yet again in 2016] and Prosperity', offering the lifeline Britain's ailing economy required.  As for any fears that there might be moves towards "an Economic andn Monetary Union" and "fixed exchange rates for the pound", the Wilson Government's own leaflet to every household promised categorically

" this threat has been removed".

END

 

 

*  *  *

 

[WE VOTED IN 1975 TO LEAVE THE NAZI-PLANNED

SUPERSTATE

AND  WE ARE STILL FIGHTING THIS NAZI ABOMINATION TODAY IN FEBRUARY 2016.

[Unfortunately even after 41 years we are still hearing the pathetic plea that we cannot LEAVE THE EU because that is where the business is. The last individual we spoke to a few days ago a technician with a mind to match could not understand that we would NOT be leaving EUROPE-THEY NEED US- but the

COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-UNDEMOCRATIC-EUROPEAN UNION

[What you are hearing from the lips of pro-EU ministers today in 2016 are the same LIES and DECEIT of 1972/3 and 1975 and ever since. We have even heard yet again about the 3million job loses -an interview on Channel 4 on February 16 -a pro-EU  minister struggling to find any constructive facts to support his pitiful view. From what we hear about Robots taking over millions of jobs in the future. The Government should be encouraging as many people particularly those who have no intention in ever integrating into our society but hope to bring about a ISLAMIC STATE to return to their natural habitat as soon as possible. It  is because of the ineptness and stupidity of the present and past governments who infected by the now discredited politically-correct notion of

MULTICULTURALISM

 has left the greater part of our major towns and Cities as

FOREIGN ENCLAVES.

 

 

ENGLAND

'WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.'

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

[THE PROOF OF THIS STATEMENT IN 2015 IS SHOWN IN MANY TOWNS AND CITIES IN OUR ONCE FAMILIAR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND BEFORE THE EU AND MASS IMMIGRATION FROM

 

FOREIGN CULTURES LEADING TO FOREIGN ENCLAVES

WITH THEIR BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 AND MORE IMMIGRATION FROM MUSLIM COUNTRIES  AND FROM  ELSEWHERE WILL UNLESS FIRM DECISIVE ACTION IS TAKEN NOW! WILL LEAD TO A FOREIGN TAKEOVER OF OUR COUNTRY WITHIN A FEW GENERATIONS . WE HAVE SEEN SOME EXAMPLES ON HOW THEY CAPITALISE ON THEIR CUSTOMARY ELECTION TACTICS ONCE DESCRIBED BY A JUDGE INVESTIGATING ELECTION FRAUD IN A LABOUR CONSTITUENCY IN BIRMINGHAM AND WOULD FIT EVENTS RECENTLY IN

TOWER+HAMLETS

AS AN EXAMPLE OF A

BANANA REPUBLIC.  

*

ANOTHER ISSUE WHICH SUCCESIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE FAILED TO TO ACT EVEN THOUGH MODERATE MUSLIM CLERICS HAVE PLEADED FOR ACTION FOR DECADES.

 

No ISLAMIC STATE would allow millions of Christians or Unbelievers to settle in their countries unless they converted to ISLAM. The PENALTY for not doing so in an ISLAMIC STATE is DEATH. It has been the GREAT WEALTH of SAUDI ARABIA brought about by their OIL DEPOSITS - a legacy of the FIRST WORLD WAR and the BRITISH-FRENCH-USA foreign policy, and the closeness of Cameron and his predecessors to the brutal regime and permitting the sales of large quantities of ARMS used to further the SAUDI HARD FUNDAMENTALIST DOCTRINE worldwide which has caused great suffering in Middle East countries and even subversion in ENGLAND itself. The results of the CHAOS now set to EXPLODE at any time ,which hopefully , will change OUR WORLD into a more EQUITABLE and FAIRER SOCIETY.]

FEBRUARY 17-2016

H.F.676/3

 
 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; AND WASTEFUL CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

HEALTH SLOT!

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

 

THIS IS:

 

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018