MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018-(1994 -Official Website -M ARCH.PT2-2018 )--MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

MARCH -FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE-2018

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

A respected English voice from the 16th century-

 Bacon, Francis (1561-1626), Eng.  Jur.,  sci.,  auth.  philosopher.

THEN AS TODAY:

'A divided England meant an England at the mercy of her foes.'

Bacon

'So Christianity holds a middle place between the sceptical rationalizing of antiquity and the unreasoning dogmatism of Mahammedanism.'

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE -         IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS

AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE TRAITOROUS EDWARD HEATH WILL BE RETURNED IN MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

 

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

In 1962,

Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality  HITLER'S plan for Europe under GERMAN Control.

 
 Brought forward from MARCH 2,2015

[REMEMBER!

ALSO

THE SEAFARERS

 OF

LOWESTOFT ON SEA

AND OTHERS

ROBBED OF THEIR CENTURIES LIVELIHOOD! AND LIBERTY!

IN 1973

IN A

SUPPOSED

EEC

GIVEN AWAY BY THE LAUGHING SAILOR BOY

EDWARD HEATH

A NAZI  TRAITOR  OF 60 YEARS

 UNTIL HIS DEATH IN 2005]

 

[vote-ukip]

 

[comments in brackets are ours!]

 

MARCH 2-2015

H.F.1512

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

LITTLEJOHN

We need a fearless leader to deliver

BREXIT

- Nigel Farage:

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN believes the former Ukip leader should be an integral part of the process after campaigning for so long

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly

Enoch Powell said famously that all political careers end in failure. Nigel Farage should have proved him wrong.

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly.

Up to a point.

The magnificent Leave victory in 2016 was a vindication of Farage’s virtually single-handed campaign to get Britain out of the EU.

Yes, others can also take credit. But Farage was the figurehead, often a lone voice in the wilderness. 

No one had to endure the vilification and violence directed at Farage as he took his message around the country year after year, well before Call Me Dave finally buckled and gave the people a long-overdue referendum.

Fifteen years ago, when I was presenting a nightly show on Sky News, I was about the only broadcaster who would give him a regular platform. The mainstream media treated him as a pariah — at best a circus act, at worst a neo-Nazi. 

This was around the time that New Labour was almost unanimously agreed to have established a 1,000-year reich and opposition to our glorious future as a European statelet was considered futile.

Aside from a few principled players in the Conservative Party — former leader and one-time Maastricht rebel Iain Duncan Smith prominent among them — the political establishment wholeheartedly embraced the EU project. 

But Farage kept banging away, making mischief in Brussels, where he’d managed to get himself elected as an MEP and used his position to ridicule the pompous panjandrums running the show.

Who can forget his wonderful denunciation of the ridiculous Herman Van Rompuy, self-styled former European ‘president’?

‘You have the charisma of a damp rag, and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk . . . Who are you? I’d never heard of you. Nobody in Europe had ever heard of you.

‘I would like to ask you, President, who voted for you . . . oh, I know democracy’s not popular with you lot, and what mechanism do the people of Europe have to remove you?

‘Is this European democracy? You appear to have a loathing for the very concept of the existence of nation states — perhaps that’s because you come from Belgium, which of course is pretty much a non-country . . .

‘Sir, you have no legitimacy in this job at all, and I can say with confidence that I speak on behalf of the majority of British people in saying: We don’t know you, we don’t want you, and the sooner you’re put out to grass, the better.’

The Westminster bubble was horrified. How dare this upstart show such a lack of respect to our European masters? But out in the suburbs and the shires, and on the rundown council estates in the North of England, millions of decent British citizens gave a silent cheer.

Call Me Dave dismissed Farage’s Ukip as a collection of ‘fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists’. It was a cruel caricature, but partly accurate. Ukip’s annual conference certainly resembles a roomful of Hyacinth Buckets and men who model themselves on the Major in Fawlty Towers.

But Ukip was on a roll — and by now Farage was a ubiquitous presence in radio and TV studios, even if he was often only there as an Aunt Sally, to be shouted at by self-righteous presenters and panellists alike.

Yet Farage stood up to the verbal slings and arrows, and to the nasty physical abuse he frequently had to endure. Cigarette in one hand, pint of best in the other, he kept on plugging away.

In the 2015 General Election, Ukip polled almost four million votes, a large chunk of them in former Labour strongholds in the North, which felt ignored and abandoned and had suffered the greatest impact from mass immigration.

Farage’s ‘fruitcakes’ didn’t make a parliamentary breakthrough but they delivered the Tories their first Commons majority since 1992, simply by denying Labour seats they had taken for granted.

Now, Cameron feared, they were coming for the Tories, so he panicked and promised a referendum on EU membership. 

Say what you like about Call Me Dave, but this was his greatest gift to the people of Britain, an opportunity we seized, asserting our sovereignty and overturning the decades-old project of submerging our country into an anti-democratic United States of Europe.

 

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be

Cameron’s gamble backfired. He resigned immediately and is now reduced to scraping a living on the international lecture circuit, essentially a political end-of-the-pier show.

Next week, he’s playing a small town theatre in Florida, but has sold fewer seats than its current production, Million Dollar Quartet, a jukebox musical featuring hits by Johnny Cash, Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins and Jerry Lee Lewis.

In the States, where they value national independence, Farage is a folk hero, a bigger draw than our former Prime Minister.

And yet.

OK, so the referendum wouldn’t have been won without Boris, Gove and the brave career politicians who dared to defy the Establishment stitch-up. But without Farage, there would have been no referendum, nor would there have been any Brexit.

What kind of Brexit, if any, remains to be seen. Which, presumably, is why Farage is now muttering about making a comeback as part of a Ukip Mark II.

The corpse of the old Ukip is still twitching, but without Farage it’s nothing. The party’s on its third post-Farage leader, no one you’ve ever heard of, and he’s on the way out over a few incendiary tweets sent by some dopey bird half his age he’s got himself hooked up with. I can’t be bothered to go into details, because it’s a waste of time.

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be.

One of the reasons Ukip imploded was because those four million voters returned to the two main parties, both of which made manifesto promises to implement Brexit in full, yet now seem hell-bent on either reneging or watering it down so far it becomes meaningless.

So I understand and share Farage’s concern. As I’ve said all along, the fix has been in since the result of the referendum was announced. The political class have stolen our biggest vote in history for anything and made it all about them — not the people they are paid to serve.

Frankly, I don’t trust any of them to deliver the Brexit we voted for. If the vast majority of MPs had their way, they’d stop the whole process in its tracks today. When Theresa May succeeded Call Me Dave, she should have established a grand cross-party coalition to negotiate our departure, including heroic Labour figures such as Gisela Stuart and Kate Hoey.

But the central player should have been Farage, a man who knows his way around Brussels and scares the EU to death.

He’d never have put up with the contemptuous treatment being meted out to Britain by Michel Barnier and his ‘damp-rag, low-grade bank clerk’ bureaucrats.

Instead, we’re stuck with Mother Theresa, who spent the referendum hiding behind the sofa and still won’t say whether she’d vote Leave if it was held today.

Her new de facto deputy, David Lidington, is a full-on federast, already speculating we could rejoin the EU at some stage. Rejoin? We haven’t even left yet — and never will, other than in name only, if the political establishment prevails.

Even David Davis seems to have gone native and Boris has been banished to the outer darkness, certainly when it comes to Brexit. In what kind of Fred Karno government is the Foreign Secretary excluded from the biggest foreign policy issue facing the country in modern history?

Never mind Boris, though. Mrs May should be making plans for Nigel, bringing him into the fold, allowing him to be an integral part of the very Brexit process for which he has campaigned so long, so hard and so selflessly.

He doesn’t need a knighthood, or a sinecure in the Lords — each of which would have been a traditional reward for his service to this country. Given the fuss over Mrs Thatcher’s memorial, I suppose a statue in Parliament Square is out of the question, too.

But what is beyond doubt is that, after Thatcher, Farage is the most influential, most significant British political figure since Churchill — much more so than the Westminster pygmies and time-servers who treat him with unwarranted disdain.

Ukip, the party he led, may be sleeping with the fishes, but if there is any justice, Farage’s career deserves to end in triumph.

Let’s hope Enoch was wrong.

 


Read more:   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5300489/We-need-fearless-leader-deliver-Brexit-Nigel-Farage.html#ixzz55RBjzeYS

 

H.F.1460

 
 

[AT LONG! LONG! LAST!

- WE LEAVE

THE

CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-GODLESS EU

 IN MARCH 2019.]

*

DAILY MAIL

-At last, Hammond's on board with

BREXIT

and the

REMOANERS are DEAD and BURIED

LEAVING THE EU

 IN

MARCH,2019

 

 

THE

DOMINIC

LAWSON

Column

 

 

Finally, it’s sorted. Until yesterday, the anti-Brexiteers known as Remoaners had high hopes of Philip Hammond, the Chancellor.

But yesterday he appeared as joint author of a newspaper article with the most adamantine Brexiteer in the Cabinet, the International Trade Secretary Dr Liam Fox. The two supposed foes declared that in March 2019, Britain would not just be leaving the EU but also ‘we will leave the Customs Union and be free to negotiate the best trade deals around the world as an independent, open, trading nation’.

Although the Cabinet Brexiteers were content with Hammond’s proposal that there should be a transition period after March 2019, pending a final settlement of the country’s arrangements with the EU, the Chancellor had given the impression he was bending to the demands of the CBI that Britain remain within the Customs Union during that unspecified period.

Blunder

This they regarded as a fatal blunder — and not just because they suspected the CBI (which had campaigned for Britain to give up sterling for the euro) of seeking to keep the UK in the EU ‘by the back door’.

As Shanker Singham, chairman of the special trade commission of the Legatum Institute (a group consulted regularly by the Government), warned last week: ‘The UK must be able to provide the clarity of being outside the Customs Union on Day 1 of Brexit.

If such clarity does not exist, then other countries will not think the UK is serious about executing an independent trade policy and they will quickly lose patience and move on.’...

...In any case, the nation has not changed its collective mind since the referendum in June 2016. If anything, views have hardened in the direction set by the result. A survey of 3,293 people published on Friday by the London School of Economics showed that even those who had voted ‘Remain’ would prefer the sort of Brexit deal the LSE’s team described as ‘hard’.

A total of 51.3 per cent of Remain voters backed a Brexit deal which delivered ‘full control’ over immigration and led to lower numbers of migrants from the EU. No fewer than 54.7 per cent of Remainers said that the UK should ‘pay nothing’ to the EU by means of a ‘divorce bill’.

And 52.2 per cent of Remainers told the LSE researchers that we should entirely free British law from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Unsurprisingly, a still higher proportion of self-identifying ‘Leave’ voters supported what the LSE termed

His statement on The Andrew Marr Show last month that failure to reach an amicable deal with the EU ‘would be a very, very bad outcome for Britain’ was seen as an attack on his Brexiteer colleagues in the Cabinet (and, indeed, on the Prime Minister).

hard Brexit’.

Monstrous

This clearly disappointed the most voluble critic of the Brexiteers on the Tory parliamentary benches, Anna Soubry. In her own newspaper article yesterday, she lamented ‘a sense of resignation among most people who voted Remain that we have to “man up” and make the most of what we know will be a rotten Brexit’...

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4787508/At-Hammond-s-board-Brexit.html#ixzz4pkbL1fqi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

[13 MONTHS

TO REGAIN OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

AUGUST 14, 2017

H.F.1281 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN!

-'WE ARE AFTER ALL AN INSULAR  ISLAND PEOPLE']

 

*

 

Even Remainers now back a

'hard' Brexit:

 Most Brits ... - Daily Mail

 

. Even Remainers now back a 'hard' Brexit: Most Brits want to regain full control ...
By Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail and Kate Ferguson For Mailonline ... a straight
choice between that and no deal, with 58 per cent backing it.

 

Most Brits want to regain full control of our borders and to become free of meddling EU judges, survey reveals

  • Most polled want the UK to become free of EU judges and full border control 

  • Two thirds said they would prefer 'no deal' rather than a soft Brexit, poll found

  • Findings boost for Theresa May who says no deal is better than a bad deal

Most Remain voters now back a Brexit that gives Britain a clean break from the EU and control back of our borders, a major study has found.

Many of those who voted to stay in the European Union also now believe the country should only pay a small ‘divorce bill’ and stop EU judges ruling over the UK.

The results are a major boost for Theresa May’s Brexit stategy - and suggest diehard Remainers, such as Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable and former prime minister Tony Blair, have overestimated support for backtracking on Brexit. 

Full artical


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782712/Most-Brits-hard-Brexit-new-survey-finds.html#ixzz4pXWhGZDU
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 FREEDOM!

 

.'..We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

Soul of England

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

 

 -PART 1

*

 

IS THERE SUCH A THING AS NATIONAL CHARACTER?

 

We assume that, and it has lately been convenient for us to defend the very doubtful thesis that every society which has enough of a distinct tradition to be called a character, has a natural right to political independence and what is called in the jargon of the hour self –determination.

 

It is plain that we cannot answer our question till we have decided what constitutes nationality.  In my brief discussion of this question I wish to acknowledge a debt to Mr. Delisle Burns.

 

John Stuart Mills says that any portion of mankind may be said to constitute a nationality if they are united among themselves by common sympathies which do not exist between them and any others, and which make them co-operate with each other more willingly than with other people. It is further necessary that they should desire to be under the same government, and that it should be government by themselves or a portion of themselves.  This definition, as Mr Burns says, would partly apply to almost any group, and partly only to an ideal society.

 

Professor McDougall, though with caution and some reserves, accepts the theory of a race spirit, or group consciousness, which is not merely the sum or resultant of individual consciousness.  This theory, which is held by many modern philosophers and psychologists, seems to me to involve an introduction of mysticism where it is least appropriate; but it is not necessary to argue the matter here.

He is on firmer ground when he says the national characteristics are in the main the expressions of different traditions.  The importance of tradition is worth emphasing. Renan too says,

 

“that which causes men to form a people is the recollection of great things which they have done together, and the will to accomplish new things.”

 

Thus he adds a common ideal, as equally important with common memories.  A nation, says another writer, is any group, which feels itself to be a nation – a definition which favours those fissiparous movements, which in our time have broken up several larger aggregates (1926)

 

However, as a rule we think we know what a nation means and we are ready with thumb-nail sketches of our neighbours, and even of ourselves.  We think of the Scot as canny, thrifty, fond of metaphysics and controversial theology, and perhaps slow to understand a joke.

 

This description may apply to the Lowlander, and to his near kinsman the north-country Englishman; it clearly does not suit the Highlander.

 

We think of the Jew as keen in money-making, fond of display if rich, and adverse to physical exertion.

 

We remember that the Romans found the Frenchmen of their day studious of the military art and of witty conversation; the modern Frenchman, we say, still exhibits those characteristics.  Rank was strongly of this opinion.

 

“Ambitious, warlike, incited by national pride, the French have kept their neighbours in constant excitement, sometimes liberating the oppressed, more often oppressing the free”

 

We are ready to describe the typical Spaniard, the typical German, and the typical American.

 

For ourselves we have the portly and good-natured John Bull, who in a cartoon, which moved Ruskin’s wrath, is represented as “guarding his pudding.”

 

OUR CHARCTERISTICS, we say, are a love of LIBERTY, JUSTICE, and DUTY (so Bishop Creighton has it); we are honest but dull and stupid, for which reason we are frequently outwitted by the nimbler intellects of our rivals [hence our present perilous situation we find ourselves in 2006 –which also had the help of our own traitors within]

 

Foreign nations do not seem to admit either our superior high-mindedness or our stupidity; but they grant us great tenacity. ENGLAND, the French say, is the country of WILL.

 

These judgements are mostly very crude. Circumstances have much to do with the impression that a country makes abroad.  Napoleon called the English a nation of shopkeepers, which is very inappropriate, for the English have never been good shopkeepers.

 

They have excelled in manufactures and commerce, but not in shop-keeping, which demands a more rigid care for the pence than is often found among Anglo-Saxons.

 

A ruling class may represent a country abroad and may there display the qualities which foreigners come to regard a characteristic of the nation as a whole, whereas in reality the masses have habits and ideals unlike those of the oligarths.

 

A nation governed by an aristocracy may seem to be high-spirited, warlike, and contemptuous of trade and manual work; when the middle class is in power the same nation may appear pacific and fond of money; under universal suffrage it may say display very different characteristics.

 

Besides all this, foreign conquest, emigration and immigration, and a differential birth-rate, may produce great changes in what is called national character.

[As we can see in the early years of the 21st century under Tony Blair]

For instance, the conquest of a country by Nordic invaders may add to the population those enterprising and restless qualities, which belong to that race, and subsequently the submergence of the Nordics by another race, such as the Alpine, may give the nation the quality of stubborn tenacity in place of the chivalrous and adventurous disposition, which formerly distinguished it.

 

Writers like Mr Lothrop Stoddard, who attach great and probably excessive importance to these racial characteristics, think that the French nation has become more “Alpine” both in blood and character since the Middle Ages.

 

Certainly the behaviour of the soldiers in the Great War belied the traditional opinions about the qualities of French and English.

 

The joviality and irrepressible gaiety of the British was contrasted with the tenacity and grimness of the French soldiery. Lastly, besides class differences, and changes from one period to another, there are provincial peculiarities, which may be important.  Even within a compact nation there may be great local difference, which cannot escape the notice of a travelling stranger.  In Spain, for example. The Galician is unlike the Andalusian, and the Catalan quite different from both.

 

These considerations may prevent us following those writers who have romantically assigned fixed characters to the nations of Europe.

 

But in spite of this, I think we may venture to claim certain qualities as characteristics of the

 

ENGLISH PEOPLE

 

-without attempting to decide whether they are racial, or due to our geographical position, our history, or our traditions.

 

Since the days of the Saxons and Vikings, the English temper has been the temper of an independent, free-spoken people [Until Blairdom arrived in 1997] –who in ordinary times are refractory to discipline and impatient of restraint, each man feeling himself fit to rule; but in times of danger ready to combine, to form

 

VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS

 

- to obey the commanders whom they have chosen, and to trust them until they have proved themselves incompetent [as in Iraq since 2003] 

 

Fifteen hundred years ago Sidonius Appollinaris describes the Saxons he had seen them – ferocious barbarians, their faces painted blue, their long hair falling over their foreheads; shy and awkward among courtiers, but turbulent and animated among their ships.

 

“One would think” he says, “that each oarsman was himself the arch-pirate.”

 

We can trace this independent spirit all through our early history, till the time came to break entirely with the medieval theory of politics both in CHURCH and STATE.

 

The rulers of the land the defiantly proclaimed that

 

“ the English Church hath always been thought, and is at this hour, sufficient and meet of itself, without the intermeddling of any exterior persons, to administer its own affairs and duties.”

 Similarly in secular matters,

 

“By sundry old authorities, histories and chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this

REALM of ENGLAND

Is

An EMPIRE.

 

-That is, a

 

 SOVEREIGN INDEPENDENT NATION

 

“and so hath been accepted in the WORLD, governed by one SUPREME HEAD and KING having dignity and royal estate of the imperial CROWN of the same.”

Among the various early descriptions of the national character we may select that of Andrea Trevisano, Venetian Ambassador in 1497.

 

“ The English are great lovers of themselves and everything belonging to them.  They think that there are no other men like themselves, and no other world but England; and whenever they see a handsome foreigner, they say that he looks like an Englishman; and when they set any delicacy before a foreigner they ask him if such a thing is made in his country.”

 

Count Magalotti, who accompanied Cosmo de Medici on a visit to Charles II in 1669, finds the English

 

“are by nature proud and phlegmatic in their behaviour, so that they never hurry those who work for them by an indiscreet impatience, but suffer them to go at their own pleasure and according to their ability.  This proceeds from their melancholy temperament, for which those who live in the north are more remarkable than those who live in the south, the former being saturnine and the latter more lively.  

 

They consider a long time before they come to a determination, but having once decided, their resolution is irrevocable, and they maintain their opinion with the greatest obstinacy.  The English are men of a handsome countenance and shape, and of an agreeable complexion, which they owe to their climate and to the salubrity of the air, and to their use of beer rather than wine. They are of a most manly spirit, and valiant even to rashness in war both by land and sea.”…

 

*

[What a right moment to close our

 

Part I

 

disclosure of

 

THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

Taken from

 ENGLAND

by

WILLIAM RALPH INGE

 Published by

 HODDER AND STOUGHTON

–1926 and 1938]

 

*          *          *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used –comments in brackets]

APRIL/06

ADDED MARCH 2-2018

In March 2018 we are but 12 month's from retrieving our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION OF ENGLAND from HITLER'S PLAN for GERMAN DOMINATION OF EUROPE AND ENGLAND IN THE PEACE.  WE have over decades described the ENGLISH as INSULAR PEOPLE with their "individual character" jealous of their once accustomed freedom, law and custom to be returned intact, unless TREASON  raises its head in the once hallowed HOUSE of the NATION. The Greek People share the "individual character" of the English People but will not see that FREEDOM which our nation secured  for THEM  over a century and more ago but ENGLAND can intercede on behalf of ALL captive nations in Europe when

ENGLAND IS FREE.

It is stated that we owe our position as a Great Power to our geographical position and [hopefully] to our comparative freedom from continental entanglements which should be in place when we LEAVE the EU in MARCH 2019.

Our greatest weakness is selling off the FAMILY SILVER or to be more precise the

BEST OF BRITISH

As the inventive spirit and success and valuable and vital power resources belong to

THE PEOPLE OF BRITAIN.

NOT TO THE GREEDY

 SQUARE MILE

OR

FOREIGN NATIONS.

H.F.1488          Brought-Forward from April-2006

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND FRAUD WHICH UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

JULY 30-2016

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

50 faith schools abuse or neglect cases-but still no prosecutions.

 

 

More than 50 child abuse or neglect cases are uncovered at illegal faith schools including a teacher striking a pupil over the head but none are prosecuted

  • Education watchdog Ofsted said it has identified more than 350 illegal schools 

  • It has issued alerts about 50 of them but nobody has been prosecuted over it 

  • Chief Inspector of Ofsted Amanda Spielman said law was not 'strong enough' 

 

More than 50 abuse or neglect cases have been uncovered in illegal faith schools in the last three years but no one has been prosecuted over them.

Pupils were being indoctrinated by extremists and exposed to danger in underground religious schools.

In one case, an Islamic school in Birmingham was allowing children to read a book which claimed all gay people should be murdered. In another, a staff member at a Jewish school was filmed striking a pupil over the head.

 
 

A staff member at a Jewish school was filmed striking a pupil over the head in footage recorded by the BBC

Many of the other schools were keeping children in filthy conditions, with no regard for health and safety law.

Ofsted said it has identified more than 350 illegal schools, and since 2014 has issued safeguarding alerts – concerns of abuse or neglect – regarding 50 of them. However, despite the findings, the Department for Education has been unable to carry out prosecutions because of a loophole in the law.

Chief Inspector Amanda Spielman said the law was not ‘strong enough’ because it did not allow Ofsted to gather the evidence needed for a prosecution. ‘We can’t even pick up evidence that we find there,’ she told a BBC news investigation.

 

If we find unsuitable teaching material we can’t even take that away.’ Schools must register with the Government, but some small faith schools are refusing to do so because they do not want to comply with the national curriculum. Parents are able to take pupils out of mainstream schooling by claiming they are being home-schooled – when really they are attending these secret institutions. Ofsted has been hunting down these schools for several years amid fears some may be breeding grounds for religious extremism.

The BBC team filmed in a suspected unregistered ultra-orthodox Jewish school in Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, where they caught on camera a teacher appearing to hit a pupil’s head.

Anne Longfield, the Children’s Commissioner for England, told the BBC investigation the footage showed ‘huge safeguarding issues’. The synagogue, on whose grounds the school is based, said it was not aware of any incidents, but asked for more information.

Photographs from inside two other suspected unregistered schools show shocking conditions, including poor food hygiene, dangerous wiring and dirty rooms.

And in the case of a Birmingham Islamic school, material was discovered advocating killing gay people.

Of the unregistered schools where a religious ethos was known, half were Islamic.

The Department for Education said: ‘The secretary of state has to consent to a prosecution. This happens at the end of the process. So far no case has reached that stage.’

 

Ofsted Chief Inspector Amanda Spielman (pictured), said that the law isn't strong enough.

 

*  *  *

 

[Unless the politically-correct  attitude of the Government is changed to a more effective deterrent against the enemies of our country more innocent people will assuredly die. Our fanatical undeterred foe within must have their citizenship withdrawn and face deportation. We hear that Saudi Arabia has a tented city for 3,000,000 people so that as their

WAHHABISM 

creed-their dominant religion a literal interpretation of the Koran has been sent into ENGLAND then they cannot complain  if we send back to them those holding such a view which we are not prepared to accept.

 AS soon as we are out of the so-called Human Rights Act of Tony Blair's making - a protection for terrorists and major criminals who make a farce of JUSTICE. HE was  also responsible one late night in the House passing secretly legislation to reduce the sentence for TREASON to Life Imprisonment. He himself should have stood trial for his lies which led to the entry of Britain into the ill-fated and most destructive Iraqi War.

Our long contention that MPs should only serve ONE TERM and MINISTERS only TWO TERMS would have saved our country from such individuals such as Blair of prolonging further mischief and the consequent great cost in lives and treasure. ]

 

Read More: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5438375/Faith-school-child-abuse-neglect-cases-ignored.html#ixzz59Ag57aSf
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.1487

 
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

WHY HE IS SO SORELY MISSED IN ENGLAND AND IN DEMOCRACIES WORLD WIDE

 

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

by

WINSTON CHURCHILL

DEATH OF THE LAST GIANT - A DAY TO REMEMBER!

Winston+Churchill-

'We are a part of Europe

but not of it'...-

 


    Winston Churchill, Myth and Reality: What He Actually Did and Said - Google Books Result
     

    Britain's attitude, Churchill explained, resembles that which we adopt about the
    European Army. We help, we dedicate, we play a part, but we are not

    merged with and do not forfeit our insular or commonwealth character. Our first object is
    the unity and consolidation of the British Commonwealth. Our second, “the
    fraternal ...

*

ALSO WISE WORDS

FROM

A Prime Minister in 1848

Over a Hundred and Sixty Four years ago a great patriotic Prime Minister - Foreign Secretary - Lord Palmerstone (Henry John Temple) - beloved by his People defined the principle of nationality as follows:

Providence meant mankind to be divided into separate nations, and for this purpose countries have been bounded by natural barriers, and races of men have been distinguished by separate languages, habits, manners, dispositions, and characters…” (1848)

 “…We have in the first place to say that the Business of an English Government, is to pursue that course of Foreign Policy which on the whole they may think right; and not to attempt the impossible task of at all times and upon all subjects doing that which is agreeable to all Foreign Governments. A man who in private life attempts to please everyone, invariably fails; and the Government of a great country would not be more successful in such an endeavour…

 . It must at times be an advantage to a foreign Prince…in the present state of the continent to visit England and to see with his own eyes, how Liberty may be combined with Loyalty, Freedom with public order, and how the Respect which is shown by the Crown for the Rights of the Subject and for the enactment of the Law produces corresponding Feelings on the Part of the People and inspires them with similar Respect for the Rights of the Crown and for the Laws which secure the Liberties and the Property of all , from the highest to the lowest in the Land. ”

[Of course the  MONARCHS  of ENGLAND since the 19th Century have been under the INFLUENCE of the ILLUMINATI.]

 

Winston Churchill warned the populace in the

1920's

 of the true facts of the ILLUMINATI who  have virtually ruled the world  since

 

WATERLOO

*

In the 1920's Winston Churchill mentioned the Jewish Bolsheviks the details a

JEW WATCH

[As we have explained the social circles which Winston Churchill  was connected  with during his long life such as the Rothchilds and like-others were the Establishment existing at the time from the Disraeli era. It was an impossibility to ignore particularly as he wished to further his career.  Of course he was a strong and enthusiastic supporter of the BRITISH EMPIRE in its outer image and must have been aware of the true nature within.   Those that might criticize him should consider the circumstances of the time which have ameliorated somewhat over the past decades until the present day when there are at last changes afoot.]

 

 

A WARNING!

 FROM A PATRIOTIC PRIME MINISTER

BENJAMIN DISRAELI

IN

 1852

In the 19th Century, Benjamin Disraeli, [Beaconsfield] a baptised Jew,[Prime Minister of England-1868 ] proclaimed:

 

...the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes...The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property...The natural equality of men and the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the secret societies who form provisional governments and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them.'
 

WE MUST NOT FORGET!

William Ewart Gladstone

 a great prime minister

 symbolised by his rolled  up sleeves-

 a man with the common touch.

*

BENJAMIN FREEDMAN -

 A JEW

UNCOVERED TO THE WORLD IN 1961 IN WASHINGTON D.C. THE

 ZIONIST CONSPIRACY.

-HE SPENT HIS LIFE WARNING THE PEOPLE OF THE GREAT DANGER TO THEIR LIVES AND LIBERTY

JEW WATCH

[As we have stated elsewhere many JEWS world-wide do NOT! agree with the  NEW WORLD ORDER - ZIONIST MESSAGE.]

JewsnotZionists

[THE FLAG ABOVE OF THE ANGLO-SAXONS THE TRUE FLAG OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE.

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM 2012

H.F.1335

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 

 

Daily Mail

 

 

 

Police tap media phones and PM tries to get editor sacked -by Stephen Glover- Daily Mail

 

POLICE TAPPING JOURNALISTS' PHONES, A PM TRYING TO GET AN EDITOR SACKED. NO, NOT RUSSIA...BRITAIN

 

...Like most people, I suspect when I was young I used to trust in the fair-play , fundamental decency, moderation and good sense of the police and other official bodies. I no longer do.

How could one after all that has happened?

I no longer think the authorities generally believe in the

RIGHT OF THE PRESS

 to freely report without fear or favour, though of course there are exceptions. As the State ever bigger and more intrusive, its tendency to conceal acts of injustice or its own sheer ineptitude grows stronger.

Which brings me to the second instance of gross interference. On Tuesday,31st January,BBC2's Newsnight broadcast an item alleging that during the EU referendum campaign

DAVID CAMERON

tried to secure the dismissal of the Editor of this newspaper, because of his stance on

BREXIT.

According to the item, Mr Cameron fruitlessly attempted to persuade the Mail's proprietor

LORD ROTHERMERE

that its Editor should go lest this newspaper's pro-Leave sentiments de-rail the Prime Minister's  ambition for Britain to stay in the EU...

But  let us not get too tangled up with the personalities involved.  It is surely deeply troubling that any British prime minister should scheme to remove an editor with whom he disagrees. In Turkey, President Erdogan, will send his heavies to a newspaper office, or he will arrest editors and journalists he doesn't like. That's what happens in many countries we like to think of as crude or uncivilised , including

RUSSIA and CHINA.

We imagine things are done differently here, but isn't it really a question of style? David Cameron is smooth and sleek and has good manners-not a risible thug such as Erdogan or Putin who will send in the bully-boys.

Yet I know that while Opposition leader he secured his dismissal of a highly critical columnist from a national paper, and later conspired to get rid of another. Now we discover he strove unsuccessfully to

FINISH OFF AN EDITOR WHO DARED TO STAND IN HIS WAY...

Full article!

 

[Some time ago we expressed our opinion that David Cameron was a perfect example of a chameleon - an inconstant person-unpredictable...This was bound to happen in a country such as England which had forgotten its roots-its history -its culture-its priceless inheritance - until the 23rd June 2016. It's association over 44 years with the undemocratic-unaccountable-power-hungry elite of the European Union had almost destroyed its once NATIONAL SPIRIT and INTEGRITY passed on from previous ages. In the nick of time the PEOPLE awoke from their complacent slumber and asked for THEIR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT COUNTRY-BACK!

 

 

FEBRUARY 2 - 2017

H.F.1102  AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM - AWAITS-

Boys will be boys as the Year of the Cock starts and war looms on the horizon

The war drums are beating as the testosterone laden Year of the Cock (Rooster) begins and the boys get ready to show who is biggest and baddest. The biggest warnings are coming from China, which has seen many of its “red lines” crossed, at least verbally, by the macho-laden administration of US President Donald Trump. The fireworks could begin after February 5th as the Chinese New Year’s holidays wind down, Chinese intelligence and secret society sources say. As the Chinese have warned, if they make a move it will be “unexpected and worse than you can imagine.”

The Trump administration, meanwhile has been too preoccupied with redrawing the maps of the Middle East and dealing with ongoing power struggle in the West to fully appreciate what will happen if China makes a military move.

Before getting back to what China could do, let us take a look at the new Middle East that is being created by the Trump administration acting in unison with Russia. What we see is the region being divided into three spheres of influence. One is Turkey with expanded zones of influence penetrating Syria and Iraq. The other is the Persian (Iranian) empire now extending into Iraq, central Syria and Lebanon. The third is the Arab zone, including Egypt, the Gulf States, Sunni parts of Iraq, Jordan and Israel. Militarily the Russians and Americans have divided their spheres of influence with Russia to the East of the Euphrates and the US to the West. The map below shows the new zones of influence in Syria.
 

mapofmideast


As many seasoned observers have noted, Trump has promised to destroy ISIS within a month even as he promises undivided support to Israel, the main sponsor of ISIS. What is really happening is that the Saudi monarchy is going to take on the fundamentalist Wahab clergy (who they secretly hate) while the Israelis will deal with fundamentalist Zionist fanatics, which are two sides of the same ISIS coin. The reward for doing this will be survival for the gulf monarchies and new pipeline routes for their gas exports to Europe via Israel and Turkey. 

For the Trump regime, fixing the Middle East will be the easy part. Trump has announced he also plans to take on the hard part, dealing with the Federal Reserve Board, by hanging of portrait of Rothschild (Fed) nemesis Andrew Jackson in the White House, Pentagon sources note. This is not something the US military government will be able to solve merely by marching into Fed headquarters and rounding up central bankers or even by bumping off members of the Rothschild family. It will rather involve dealing with China.

Here is how a source close to the Rothschilds described the situation. “The Rothschilds are embedded in China, and have been for many years. All of their gold and liquid assets are in China…Everything that happens is well thought out and planned long in advance.”

Chinese intelligence agency and secret society sources told representatives of the White Dragon Society last week that if China decided to move military it would...

 

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

 

Now that Trump is president the real horse trading begins

Now that the Trump regime has formally been installed, the real battle over the future of the planet ...

 

H.F.1093 FREEDOM NOW

  DAILY MAIL-

COMMENT-

 

This paper is no great admirer of Trump...

 

 

 

This paper is no great admirer of Trump. But to all his hysterical critics we say: Oh! do calm down!

 

 

 

LET the Mail lay its cards on the table: we have never been a great admirer of Donald Trump. Though we agree with some of the things he has said and done, we have strong reservations about his style of politics. WE find many of his pronouncements and policies misguided-and a few frankly distasteful.

But like it or not, he is the democratically elected President of our greatest and most powerful ally, who has deep affection for our country. A strong supporter of

BREXIT

, he has said repeatedly that he wants to strengthen America's links with us and see us prosper after we

WITHDRAW FROM THE EU

But clearly, the massed ranks of our liberal elites and their sheep-like followers have other ideas. For they have made it plain that they would rather see Britain risk its security and be reduced to penury than do business with, let alone show friendship to, a US, led by a man with whom they viscerally disagree and paint as a monster.

Indeed, their hysterical reaction to Mr Trump's executive order restricting immigration from seven mostly Islamic countries has been wildly over the top, making the brash President himself look positively restrained by comparison.

Yes, there are respectable arguments to be made against his order and the way it has been implemented. AS nobody can deny. It has thrown airports into chaos and caused acute inconvenience, uncertainty and distress to many travellers who pose no threat whatever to America.

But it is blatantly false to suggest that this is a racist measure, directed against all followers of the

ISLAMIC FAITH

Indeed,, the overwhelming majority of the world's Muslims

REMAIN FREE AS EVER

to travel to the U.S.

Furthermore, the list of those ion whom restrictions have been imposed was drawn up under

PRESIDENT OBAMA

who was  also notably slow in giving sanctuary to

SYRIAN REFEGEES.

This paper does not recall the LEFT accusing

HIM OF RACISM

-or, incidentally , attacking those nations that refuse entry to travellers with Israeli stamps in their passports...

 

Full article

 

*  *  *

[In England it has been estimated that at least 60% of Muslims in England-approximately 1,800,000 will never integrate into our society and there is no evidence that the Government is doing much about this vital matter because of political correctness- AS now is happening in a number of countries-those who now enter a country must sign a commitment to INTEGRATE and should they NOT DO SO-they are deported back to their country of origin.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

FEBRUARY 1 , 2017

 

H.F.1103 FREEDOM- AWAITS!

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

The Spirit of England - Churchill in London -

St George’s Day-1953.

 

*

 

An excerpt from Sir Winston Churchill’s broadcast speech to the Honourable Artillery Company, given in London 40 years ago-

on St. George’s Day,

 

*

THIS ENGLAND

Publication -Spring-1993.

 

 

‘It is twenty years since I had to speak on the toast of

 

ENGLAND

 

And

on

St. George’s Day.

 

Twenty years - it’s a long time and a lot has happened, but in those bygone days I did try to see what would have happened if St. George had lived twenty years ago, and really it does apply very much to what might happen if he lived today.

 

I said St. George would arrive in Cappadocia accompanied not by a horse but by Secretary of State. He would be armed not with a lance but with several flexible formulas.

 

He would, of course, be welcomed by the local branch of the League of Nations Union - or I ought to alter that to be correct and say the United Nations Union.

 

He would propose a conference with the dragon - a Round Table Conference - no doubt it would be so much more convenient for the dragon’s tail.

 

He would make a Trade Agreement with the Dragon. He would loan the dragon a lot of money. The maiden’s release would be referred to Geneva (it would now be to New York), the dragon observing all his rights meanwhile. Finally, the dragon would be photographed with St, George.

 

Now, I do not think there’s anything very wrong with this passage although twenty years have passed, but there are a few things I would like to mention about

 

ENGLAND

 

I’m not boasting but I would like to say that here no one questions the fairness of our

 

Courts of Law and Justice.

 

We have our own way of life that is so. Here no one thinks of persecuting a man on account of his religion or his race.

 

Here everyone, except the criminals, looks on the policeman as the friend and servant of the public.

 

Here we provide for poverty and misfortune with more compassion, in spite of all our burdens, than any other country.

Here we assert the rights of the citizen against the

 

STATE

 

-       criticize the

-        

-    GOVERNMENT of the DAY

 

-without failing in our duty to the

 

Crown

 

- or our LOYALTY to the

 

QUEEN.

 

If I’m not detaining you too long there are two points I would like to make.

 

One is our weakness.

 

Our weakness is that there are always a certain number of English people who wake up every morning -very brainy they are -they wake up and they look all round the fields and they think

 

‘NOW WHAT IS THERE THAT BELONGS TO OUR COUNTRY THAT WE CAN GIVE AWAY?’

 

[Reminds us of Tony Blair and his cronies and adherents around the country in local government and the business community in 2006. and the indecent haste of Gordon Brown to ratify the Lisbon Treaty in June 2008 in order to prove to the German/Franco bloc that he is a good european.]

 

or

 

‘WHAT IS THERE WE CAN FIND THAT HAS MADE OUR COUNTRY GREAT THAT WE CAN PULL DOWN?’

 

[Ditto -above -of course!]

 

Well, that is the question they ask themselves and THAT IS OUR WEAKNESS - they are very brainy and they have done us a great deal of harm.

 

[Ditto- as above - of course!]

 

On the other hand,

 

ENGLAND

 

-has a quality which no-one should overlook.

 

ENGLAND

 

-like Nature, never draws a line without smudging it.

 

We lack the sharp logic of some other countries whom in other ways we greatly admire - in our climate, the atmosphere is veiled, there are none of these sharp presentations, an although we have our differences they do not divide us as they do in nearly all the other countries of the WORLD.

 

There is a great underlying spirit of neighbourliness and there is without doubt a strong sense of

 

NATIONAL UNITY and LIFE

 

-       Which, though it doesn’t help us in the small matters with which we have to deal from day to day, may well be our Salvation in our troubles.

 

‘NOTHING CAN SAVE ENGLAND IF SHE WILL NOT SAVE HERSELF’

 

[That means each one of YOU in 2006 and in June 2008]

 

If we lose

FAITH in OURSELVES,

in our

 capacity to guide and govern,

if we lose

our will to live,

then indeed

our story is told.

 

If, while on all sides foreign nations are every day asserting a more aggressive and militant nationalism by arms and trade - if we remain paralysed by our own theoretical doctrines or plunged in the stupor of after-war exhaustion, all that the croakers predict will come true and

 

OUR RUIN WILL BE CERTAIN AND FINAL.

 

But why should we break up the solid structure of British power founded upon so much, kindliness, and FREEDOM?

 

Why should we break it up for dreams which may some day come true but now are only dreams, or it may be nightmares?

 

We ought as a nation and Empire -you won’t mind my mentioning that WORD? I didn’t get shouted down when I said it twenty years ago tonight -Empire, we might, we ought, to weather any storm that blows at least as well as any other existing system of human government.

 

We are at once more experienced and more truly united than any other people in the world.

 

It may well be, I say, that the most glorious chapters of our history are yet to be written. Indeed, the very problems and dangers that encompass us in our country ought to make English man and women of this generation glad to be here at such a time.

 

We ought to rejoice at the responsibilities with which destiny has honoured us and be proud that we the guardians of our country in an age when her life is a stake.

 

I have lived, since then, to see

 

OUR COUNTRY

 

-accomplish, achieve her

 

FINEST HOUR

 

-and I have no doubt that if the

 

SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

-continues, there is no reason at all why twenty years hence someone may not stand at the table of this ancient company and speak in the sense of pride and hope in which I have ventured to address you tonight.

 

* * *

 

[Sadly -the twenty years later in 1972 with the connivance of the many members of

YOUR PARLIAMENT

of ALL parties and many in the business community the 1972 Act of Accession to the EU -then falsely described as the EEC -European Economic Community came into being.

 

There are still politicians alive today in 2006 who betrayed their country and a distinguished few including Tony Benn who tried to get the people to see through the LIES and DECEIT which led eventually in 2005 to the almost absorption of ENGLAND and her sister nation-states into the

 

Despotic and Totalitarian Police State

 

calling itself

 

The United States of Europe.

 

It was the French and Dutch voters who saved ENGLAND in 2005 as our Prime Minister signed twenty fives times the Treaty in Rome which called for the Slavery of a People who had failed to remember the words of their greatest Prime Minister

Winston Churchill in 1953]

 

‘Nothing can save England if she WILL NOT save herself’.

 

* * *

 

THE TRUTH IN VERSE

 

of

 

Strasbourg and Brussels

(With apologies to Sweet Molly Malone)

by

 

John Culerwell

 

 

‘In Brussels’ fair city where the EU sits so pretty,

 

I first set my eyes on the European clone.

 

And she wielded some powers that used to be ours

 

Til we tossed them away with the Treaty of Rome.

 

She is a great sponger and sure to no wonder,

 

Her colleagues are all just the same.

 

They all wield those powers that used to be ours

 

Before we got timid and tame.

 

It’s hard to describe them without being rude,

 

Red tape is the product they freely extrude,

 

By the edicts they issue fair trade is afflicted

 

And poor nations’ prospects severely restricted.

 

On the fat of the land lives the Eurocrat Band

 

And the Gravy train runs at full steam.

 

Not for them the poor food of an African’s bread.

 

The Clones live on the honey and cream.

They can only be sacked for blowing the gaff

 

And telling the world the accounts are

naff.

 

But they regulate this then subsidise that

 

The handouts they hand out are financed by VAT.

 

Where Hitler has failed, the Clones have prevailed

 

With the help of our legislators

 

By these deeds of disgrace our MPs have lost face

 

And can only be thought of as TRAITORS

They seek to enslave us (ONLY UKIP CAN SAVE US)

 

It’s all a set part of the Eurocrats aim.

 

They are parasites ALL and they’ve got us in thrall

 

And don’t know the meaning of SHAME.

 

The Clones, we abhor them, we didn’t vote for them

 

If they think they are wanted the answer is NO!

 

But due to their muscles in Strasbourg and BRUSSELS

 

They thrive, they thrive-O.

 

*

obtained from:

 

Eurofacts

April 7-2006-04-07

Vol 11 No 13.

 

08456 120 175

info@junepress.com

 

*

 

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 

[FRIDAY, APRIL 7, 2006]

 

*

 

WHY Brussels won’t take NO for an answer

 

IN the very week that reveals more evidence of the cynicism and persistent illegality at the [ROTTEN] heart of the EU, Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson - who should concentrate on promoting FREE TRADE in a scandalously protectionist EU - pushes for a NEW CONSTITUTION that would hand BRUSSELS more power.

 

You thought Europe’s INPERIAL ambitions were DEAD?

 

THINK AGAIN.

 

Ever since French and Dutch voters threw out the CONSTITUTION, Eurocrats have been busily introducing key elements of the DOCUMENT by the BACK DOOR.

 

A European Public Prosecutor…

 

a DEFENCE AGENCY…

 

a CHARTER of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS…

 

a FOREIGN MINISTER…

 

all these and MORE ate being foisted on us anyway.

 

DEMOCRACY?

 

WHO CARES?

 

 

NOW Mr Mandelson [Meddlesome] wants to go the whole hog.

 

He says NATION STATES must SURRENDER even MORE SOVEREIGNTY for the sake of an expanding EU, and of course he speaks for BRUSSELS.

 

But examine the sorry reality behind his grandiose vision.

 

FRAUD is RAMPANT

 

THE MONSTROSITY of the COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY

CONTINUES

 

And this week

 

EUROPE’S supposedly FREE MARKET is again exposed as a

SICK JOKE

 

Twenty years ago, this country passed the SINGLE EUROPEAN ACT, as part of a European -wide initiative to TEAR DOWN barriers to TRADE.

 

A GREAT IDEA

in

THEORY

 

[which could have been achieved by all Nation States out of a DESPOTIC and TOTALITARIAN EU -with Britain giving the LEAD?]

 

BUT in practice it is a FIASCO, with most of our ‘partners’ outrageously flouting the LAW (to the disadvantage of Britain, which generally abides by the rules).

 

NOT ONLY have Member States -notably FRANCE, GERMANY, SPAIN and ITALY -rigged their ENERGY MARKETS to frustrate FOREIGN COMPETITION, but also they and others have consistently

 

BROKEN THE RULES

 

on everything from

 

State Airlines to Telecoms.

 

NOW the [EU] COMMISSION reveals the SCALE of the LAW-BREAKING with a blizzard of actions against 17 members) including Britain, for a technical infringement [they HAD TO get us in the net with the true offenders]

BUT WILL ANYTHING CHANGE?

 

[

  General de Gaulle   knew of our DIFFERENCES and vetoed our ENTRY to the then EEC and since a number of ex-COMMISSIONERS of the EU have said the same about how we would be the right example of conduct in the EU. What a waste of 34 years and the BILLIONS of POUNDS we have spent on a Fool’s errand because of the

 

Nazi TRAITORS- Edward Heath  -Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon and countless others then and since and still today now within our midst.]

 

FRANCE isn’t suddenly going to abandon the protectionism it has got away with for years.

 

NEITHER WILL THE OTHERS.

 

The habit of cheating is ingrained in an EU that is institutionally dysfunctional, corrupt and remote.

AND AS ALWAYS THE OPINIONS OF ORDINARY VOTERS MATTER NOT A JOT.

 

* * *

[We believe that the ONLY WAY to get us out of the mess of the EU would be for a CAMPAIGN for every voter to wear conspicuously a EMBLEM of their love of FREEDOM out of the EU and the others to wear chains from their mobiles or wherever so everyone will know who is for FREEDOM and who for SLAVERY.

Until there is a positive identification of the opponents within our community the GOVERNMENT can always say that it is only a FRINGE element involved. It is time to put aside OUR NATURAL RESERVE and not be afraid to wear a

 

BADGE of FREEDOM

 

We realise that in history even in our own country over 700 years ago wearing of insignia of a people led to evacuation of the Jews from ENGLAND until their return under Cromwell.

 

Under the Nazi Regime we are all aware of the millions of Jews and many others who were murdered during the 2nd World War

 

THEIR INSIGNIA BROUGHT DEATH

 

BUT

 

OUR INSIGNIA WILL BRING FREEDOM

 

Unless we put the issue above a PARTY and make it ONE of each INDIVIDUAL making a CHOICE for either

 

SLAVERY

 

or

 

FREEDOM

 

This way it will be impossible for the likes of Nice-Guy Dave and his close buddy Tony and their ilk to denigrate those who wish to be

 FREE

 Who will make a stand with others -together of what ever political persuasion or none? If we lost a relative many of us would wear a black armband or sombre clothing. Surely the possible total lose of

 

ONE’S COUNTRY and FREEDOM

 

demands some identification by each who no longer wishes to stand by and see the

 

"Rights and Liberties"

 

of

OUR INHERITENCE

lost

FOREVER.

*

[Font altered-bolding & underling used-comments in brackets]

APRIL/06

[Amended version in 2008- to take account of events in June 2008]

HOME

 

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

*

[ADDED -SEPTEMBER-2009]

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

MAGNA CARTA/ ****A Constitution millions died for/**** Bill of Rights of 1688 - OUTLAWS EUROPEAN UNION/****Almost everything which is most precious in our civilisation has come from small states/****Why We Must Remain A Christian Country/****England or European Regions/Provinces-You Cannot have BOTH!/GOVERNMENT BY CONSENT/****English Constitution-By It They Lived-For it They Died./**** A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION -CONSPIRATORS NAMED/**** Our Loyalty to our institutions and country/****Liberties of Parliament -Birthright of subjects of England/****WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT-Part 1-3/ ****The Heritage of England is a Whole made up of Many Parts/**** The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island's Defenders of Freedom now at Greater RISK./****Our basic Liberties and Freedoms - to be surrendered to a FOREIGN POWER/****TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS by NORRIS  Mc WHIRTER - Lest we Forget/****The Truth About A Federal Europe-Parts1-4/****A TIME TO MAKE A STAND/****COULD ENGLAND SURVIVE OUTSIDE THE EU?-YES!/****The Rotten Heart of Europe-by Bernard Connolly-Parts 1-4/****SAY 'NO' TO EUROPE! SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON/****So You Thought You Were FREE/****Empires have gone and most people in the world now live in Nation States said Lord Shore/****Freedom of Speech-A Freedom which cannot be abused - is NOT WORTH HAVING/****MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION/****England's place in theUNION?/****ENGLISH FREEDOM -WHY IT IS YOURS/****Our Loyalty to our Institutions and Country/

 *

[ Click HERE:There are hundreds of bulletins on ENGLISH FREEDOM listed  within and at the end of the

MAIN BULLETIN FILE]

WORK IN PROGRESS - We need to add this information to each of the bulletins above in order to assist you to scan them without leaving the site-We hope to complete it shortly.

 

SEPTEMBER-2009

*

TOP

HOME

H.F.1448

Brought forward from October, 2005.

 

Revealed after his death that EDWARD HEATH: A agent of the Nazi International and Traitor to his Country

since 1938

 

[The following article is one of many in-depth studies in the Financial and Political Field which are available in a respected INDEPENDENT quarterly journal International Currency Review

established in 1965

World Reports Ltd –108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF Telephone:  +44(0) 20-7222 3836.

Website: www.worldreports.org

*

THE NAZI AGENT WHO BECAME

BRITISH PRIME MINISTER.

 

GERMAN PENETRATION OF THE UK AND U.S. STRUCTURES

 

The death of Sir Edward Heath on 17th July 2005 has ‘enabled’ intelligence services to reveal to us what had previously been carefully withheld from the public domain – namely that Sir Edward was a long-term agent of the German Nazi intelligence organisation called *DVD (* Details on our Bulletin Board-A BLOCKBUSTER EXPOSE OF THE ILLEGAL- CORRUPT EU), Based, to this day in Dachau, the location of one of Nazi Germany’s most satanic extermination camps.

 

On the day following Heath’s death, the Editor received an unexpected briefing from a UK intelligence source, who informed him about Heath’s treacherous background.  A day later, another veteran, UK intelligence source conveyed ‘further and better particulars’, independently of the first source.  No doubt this service was selected for this exposure because of the expectation that the previously withheld intelligence would be used.  What these appalling revelations mean is that Britain’s entry into the EEC was fraudulent, which means that there is no problem leaving it.

 

FOLLOWING HEATH’S DEATH, THE NAZI STRATEGIC DECEPTION IS EXPOSED.

 

For many years, British opponents of the United Kingdom’s disastrous membership of the European Union Collective, have been aware that no amount of decisive rational argument is liable to prevail in the minds of the tight-knit, self-serving elite of geopoliticians who direct this flawed policy, led today by the Fabian Society, with its symbol of a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

 

Those engaged in the guerrilla war that we have been waging to recapture Britain’s total Independence from the EU Collective in the face of what is so conspicuously a CONSPIRACY, include some of the most intellectually talented people and ‘actives’ of their generation.

 

ONE of their number, Peter Jay, the former British Ambassador in Washington, contributed his warnings about the dangers of currency and monetary collectivism in a lecture that we published (International Currency Review) in this service, Peter Jay having been among the early contributors to this journal.  We publish a part of his analysis in this issue [See: ‘We told you so’, pages 145-152].

 

Having, as we and others see it, long since won the intellectual arguments against Britain’s continuing membership of this geopolitical collectivism experiment, we have been apt to question among ourselves the reasons for all our overwhelming decisive practical arguments being officially ignored, at least for public consumption purposes.  Many suggestions have been put forward, but none seems conclusive.

 

With the death in July 2005 of Sir Edward Heath, who negotiated Britain’s accession to the European Communities (now The European Union, which we always refer to as the European Union Collective, this being a more accurate description) all has suddenly become clear.  And the TRUTH is shocking, and will shock most of those who read this report, and the large number of those in sensitive quarters who also read this publication.

 

Within a few days of Heath’s death on 17th July 2005 at the age of 89, the Editor of this service received two separate comfirmations both from British Intelligence sources, that Edward Heath was a long-term agent of German (Nazi) intelligence.   In fact Edward Heath betrayed his country for 60 years-the longest penetration in history.

 

To remain undiscovered for 60 years is an achievement without parallel in the sordid history of geopolitical intelligence.

 

Edward Richard George Heath became a member of the Oxford ring, based at Balliol College, consisting of himself, Roy Jenkins, Geoffrey Rippon and Arthur (Madron) Seligman, who were together at Oxford University.

 

All were recruited through by a German intelligence agent working inside the College –Arnold Toynbee. Roy (‘WoY’) Jenkins, later, Ld Jenkins of Hillhead) later became the Chancellor of the exchequer in Wilson’s Labour Government and subsequently the President of the European Commission (EC) while Geoffrey Rippon was the co-signatory together with Edward Heath of the United Kingdom’s Treaty of Accession to the European Communities in January 1972, which led to Britain becoming a member of the EEC on 1st January 1973. Notwithstanding this, in February 1972, the Second Reading in the House of Commons was approved by a majority of only eight, ‘ in an atmosphere that degenerated into fisticuffs.’

 

MOST SUCCESSFUL NAZI PENETRATION

 

Arnold Toynbee’s recruitment became the most successful German intelligence penetration operation ever directed at the United Kingdom, with three members of the Oxford Ring playing central roles in forcing Britain predominately against its will, into the German-sponsored European political and economic collective, which, as is reviewed in the next section, is a hot bed of corruption.

 

Both Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon received secret payments in exchange for their signatures on the Accession document, setting the scene for the subsequent corrupt payments for similar services rendered by some of their successors.

 

For the odious intergovernmental system of secret intelligence-managed ‘Black Operations’ geopolitical ‘facility fees’ or special corrupt payments –which as we have deduced from our research, and have confirmed from special sources, is universally the norm today –was already well established at the beginning of the 1970’s.

 

It was partially for this purpose that the colossal cache of giga-funds initially worth $27.5 trillion, and now of the order of $55+ trillion, exposed in the preceding issue of this service, was raised under George H. W. Bush Sr. The primary reason was to bail out the Western banking system, by redistributing funds around the financial system so as to forestall systemic banking collapses.

 

A NAZI AGENT IN DOWNING STREET

Edward Heath was a German (Nazi) agent who became Prime Minister of Great Britain.

 

As soon as he was unexpectedly voted into power in 1970, he immediately set about to fulfil his secret instructions to bamboozle the British people and the House of Commons (which he did by perpetrating a number of gross lies that have since been exposed) into pleading for and accepting membership of the secretly German-sponsored political collective.  And the initiators and directors of this project were the superior brains at the Madrid-based Nazi International, a.k.a. the German geopolitical Centre, reviewed here.

 

Your correspondent remembers actually standing inside Downing Street, as it was possible to do in those days, and watching the newly elected Prime Minister entering Number 10 in triumph on the day of his election, 18th June 1970 after securing a narrow victory over the Labour Party led by Harold Wilson, having started at a clear disadvantage in the opinion polls.

 

The so-called ‘Conservatives’ won office with an overall majority of 30 seats.

 

HEATH’S OVERT-COVERT BACKGROUND

 

Heath first entered the Westminster Parliament with a tiny majority of 133 votes in the marginal seat of Bexley, which he held until he belatedly retired from the House of Commons in 2001.

 

According to the obituary published in The Daily Telegraph, ‘in his maiden speech, he attacked the Labour Government for its very negative response to the Schumann Plan to create a SINGLE European market in coal and steel’

 

When Harold Macmillan became Prime Minister some 13 years earlier in 1957, he celebrated his victory with Edward Heath over a dinner of oysters and champagne at the Turf Club; and in 1960,

 

Macmillan brought Heath into the Cabinet as Lord Privy Seal, responsible for negotiating the United Kingdom’s first application to join the European Economic Communities.  Harold Macmillan, like Edward Heath, has now been internally exposed by intelligence sources as a secret agent of the German Abwehr (Department of Defence, or military apparat)

 

Heath was an agent of the super-secret German DVD –or Deutsche Vericherungs Dienst – the continuing intelligence service of the ultra-covert Nazi international, which established itself as the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid in 1943, when leading German officials realised there was a 50% chance that Germany would lose the war.  The DVD organisation itself was set up by Admiral Canaris in 1944.

 

The DVD is so secret that its finances are hidden (that is, it is financed by ‘Black Operations’ resources) and there appear to be no traces at all of thus service being funded by the German taxpayer, precisely because it is funded clandestinely.

 

And what will cause very great astonishment outside intelligence services around the world is the location where the DVD is based: DACHAU, the town that gave its name to the notorious concentration and Holocaust extermination camp.

 

While visiting the Salzburg (music) festival in 2003, Sir Edward Heath was alerted by DVD that his live-long service to Germany’s covert nazi intelligence community had been uncovered by British investigators.  One of the intelligence sources reports that he literally blew a fuse when this warning was delivered –which is to say, he suffered a pulmonary embolism.

 

Plans to interrogate Heath were blocked at Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) level by no 10 Downing Street.  One of our cynical special sources commented: ‘No surprises there’- given that M16 is headed by an operative allegedly considered to be an asset of French intelligence [Would it be our own John Scarlett?].

 

The super-secret covert ‘Black’ Nazi DVD acts with the approval of the German Government, and ‘owns’ the German Chancellorship, beginning with the postwar Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, who was an asset of the German Abwehr before its collapse.

It follows that the German Government is, at any point in time, actually the instrument of the secret Nazi international Establishment, the main blueprint of which was intercepted by the Allies in the early 1950’s.

 

MASTER OF BALLIOL’S SUSPICIONS

 

When the members of the Nazi oxford ring were recruited, the Master of Balliol College (Lindsay) entertained certain nagging suspicions.  It is understood he was initially tipped off by the College’s Head Porter; at all events, the master reported the members of the Ring to M15, which ‘then’ maintained a recruiter (for British intelligence) at  Oxford University, and had become well aware of the German intelligence activity in the Oxford area during the months prior to the Munich Conference, from which the Prime minister Mr Joseph Chamberlain, returned from his fatal meeting with Herr Hitler in premature triumph in 1938.

 

The future British prime Minister was by then already on the Nazi external intelligence payroll.  He is reported by one source to have complained about encountering problems in paying a loan from a Kent Education Committee, even though as indicated he was already on the German payroll and was initially paid more than £250 annually, which was a very large sum of for a pre-war university student, in those days. (Your own correspondent, who came down from Christ Church, Oxford in the spring of that year, before emigrating to Canada later in 1959)

 

After the war M15 arranged for Master Lindsay to travel to the British Occupation Zone in Germany, where he met the British counterintelligence officers working on the so-called De-Nazification Programme, which was aborted when the already penetrated OSS, parent of the American CIA, reversed its policy under intense pressure from the US State Department led by George Kennon, and commenced the process which led to the importation and resettlement of at least 770 prominent Nazi scientists who had all been working on Heinrich Himmler’s jet-black satanic experiments and operations-including the development of occult psychopolitical personal and mass psycho-manipulative and personality modification techniques, and on rocket science and space travel innovations.

 

One source believes that Lindsay met with Brigadier Lathbridge, a senior British intelligence officer working in the British Zone.  Lathbridge is reported to have been unaware of the continuing \Nazi International secret intelligence service DVD, although he also believed to have suspected the existence of a powerful Nazi organisation that was engaged in the protection of high-ranking Nazis and overseas Nazi intelligence assets who have been left in place in 1945.

 

One of these was Edward Heath Further enquires were reportedly blocked in London and by assets of the DVD within the Nazi-penetrated OSS, which controlled access to Munich, to which location Edward Heath’s Abwehr (German external intelligence) file had been transferred from the German Abwehr headquarters in Berlin.

 

Today, the London Station of the continuing Nazi International’s DVD is shared with the overt German intelligence service, BND (Bundes Nachrichten Dienst.

 

*

 

EDWARD HEATH DESPATCHED

 

The traitor’s funeral service was held at Salisbury Cathedral at 2.30pm on Monday 25th June 2005. Attending the event were representatives of British intelligence, and the DVD itself, in the guise of German diplomats (BND officers, whom M15 will have been particularly interested in, given the likelihood of their secret Nazi intelligence provenance beneath their diplomatic cover.

 

A counter-intelligence review of all attendees will doubtless have been undertaken, given the necessity to establish what other assets the DVD may have recruited within the British Establishment.

 

It is no coincidence that this service  International Currency Review was the first to be informed of Heath’s long-term Nazi intelligence connections,

as it appears that there are no other remaining independent financial and geopolitical publishers left.

 

An entirely separate, veteran, British intelligence source, with detailed knowledge of intelligence warfare following the ‘defeat’ of the Nazi regime in 1945, adds:

 

‘By 1945, Edward Heath had been assigned to the Ministry of Aircraft Production with the support of a high-ranking German asset inside the Ministry who had been promoted by Lord Beaverbrook during the war and who had successfully delayed production of the successful De Havilland DH 98 Mosquito, during the war years’. Established within the Ministry, Heath worked on the ‘successful’ Comet and Tudor sabotage programmes, although it is unclear whether he was involved in the assassination of Roy Chadwick, the designer of the Tudor aircraft and the lead designer on the early Vulcan bomber programme’.  By ‘successful’ in this context, the source meant, of course, that Heath was instrumental in procuring the failure of the military projects in question.

 

‘The Germans’ , our second source advises, ‘recruited a rigger at the Woodford, Essex plant, who reversed the elevator controls of a Tudor  (from reflection) aircraft which was then boarded by Chadwick, who had earlier designed the Manchester and the Lancaster bombers[?] –his assassination holding back development after the war of the Avro Vulcan’.

 

This implication is that the assassination of the brillant aircraft designer was in sequence with sabotaging of the two earlier aircraft programmes with which Mr Heath was directly associated.

*          *          *

[Font altered-bolding and underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

 

 

[After what we have heard about our traitor Heath there should be a petition raised in order to have his body shipped to Germany for re-burial.

 

 Over the past ten years we have always looked on the smiling sailor who gave away our Country and the Fishing Fleets as already a traitor before hearing about his traitorous behaviour before the Second World War-during and since in betraying his country.

 

If there is sufficient proof of guilt on anyone alive today who is implicated with Heath in his despicable plans –then the Law of High Treason should prevail.

 

We are sickened as we are sure the majority of people in this country of the career of the Traitor Edward Heath and if there are others like him alive today which we are told there are then we expect an untainted Prime Minster in the future will see that Justice is Done.

 

WE can only hope that there are men of principle that love their country in our Intelligence Services who will root out the bad eggs as quickly as possible so that the people will not have to conclude that their supposed protectors are working for a foreign power.]

 [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

*         *          *

We shall be continuing with our extracts from the International Currency Review with further subjects to air which many of you will find hard to believe but after the revelations about a past Prime Minister nothing will surprise us about what will be uncovered in the future.

 

We hope you will be interested enough to get in touch with the Editor: Christopher Story for confirmation of the authenticity of the articles we have displayed which are just a few of the many which are available in book form from them –a quarterly journal which is not afraid to expose the trickery of politicians and others around the world with particular reference to the EU.

 

[Font altered=bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

OCTOBER 10-2005

 

*         

For further details contact:

  

International Currency Review

 

World Reports limited

108 Horseferry Road

Westminster

London SWIP 2EF

Telephone +44 (0)20-7222 3836

www.worldreports.org

Editor: Christopher Story FRSA

Veteran UK financial and intelligence analyst

E-mail: cstory@worldreports.org

 

Website:www.worldreports.org

 [MUCH OF THE WORK SHOWN BELOW WAS THAT OF CHRISTOPHER STORY WHO DIED IN 2010.  WE WERE SENT INFORMATION IN 2005 AND IN 2001 WHICH WE IMMEDIATELY PUT ON OUR WEBSITE AS SHOWN BY THE MONTH AT THE FOOT OF THIS PAGE.   THERE HAS BEEN A SILENCE FROM OUR FREE PRESS ABOUT THE TREASON OF THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH  AND HIS ASSOCIATES WHEREAS THE COMMUNISTS ARE ALWAYS IN THE NEWS TO THE PRESENT DAY. ]

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

 

 

Christopher Story -

Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Story

Christopher Edward Harle Story FRSA (8 March 1938 – 14 July 2010) was an
English writer, publisher and government adviser specialising in intelligence and
economic affairs, who is perhaps best known for his collaboration with KGB
defector Anatoliy Golitsyn on the 1995 book The Perestroika Deception.
Christopher Story
A PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

*          *          *

H.F.1497    -Brought forward from October, 2005

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

HOME

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM? THAT IS YOUR CHOICE

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-June 27,2008]

DEMOCRACY and freedom. It is a fine sounding phrase-rarely off the lips of President Bush as he blunders around the Middle East.

Why do we readily accept that democracy and freedom are natural partners? There is scant historical evidence for it. Often it is a case of

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM: even DEMOCRACY versus FREEDOM.

Consider two examples.  the United States is the only country to have banned alcohol by public demand. Contrast this with Hong Kong. Until shortly before being handed back by

BRITAIN to BEIJING

 it had

NO DEMOCRACY

at all: It was ruled by a colonial governor. Yet enjoyed enviable freedom with one of the least intrusive governments -and flourished wonderfully.

Our own experience also has much to tell us.

BEING A DEMOCRACY HAS NOT PROMOTED PERSONAL LIBERTY.

QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

More than

3000

 NEW OFFENCES

have been created since 1997, and officialdom revels in nearly

300 POWERS OF ENTRY.

Much of this is due to the

EUROPEAN UNION

whose

DIRECTIVES

are rarely scrutinised, let alone debated , by our supposedly democratic representatives.

WHAT we may SAY, WRITE or DO, or whom WE EMPLOY has been increasingly limited. The Government has passed legislation which can make assisting your son's football team

AN OFFENCE.

Another side of our

'democracy'

demonstrates painfully how the public will is constantly flouted. Take the brazen example of voters being

PROMISED REFERENDUM

on

CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

resulting from the

LISBON TREATY

The unscrupulous machinery of government has been deployed to

FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC WILL.

I am not making a party point.

FOR OVER 40 YEARS, GOVERNMENTS OF BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN RESISTING AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC DEMAND FOR CURBS ON

IMMIGRATION.

especially from the

NEW COMMONWEALTH.

 While successive governments have made a show of meeting public demand, they have, quite consciously

REFUSED TO ADDRESS IT

throwing occasional tit-bits to the voters in the hope

THAT THIS WILL KEEP THEM QUIET.

Consider, also, the strong public demand for

CRIMINALS TO BE PROPERLY PUNISHED.

Successive governments, including Mrs Thatcher's have come under the sway of the

'PRISON REFORM'

people -with the result that

CRIMINALS RECEIVE VERY MODEST SENTENCES.

What is more, if they serve a sentence at all, it is in the softest conditions.

IF LYING ON YOUR BED AND WATCHING TV FOR A FEW MONTHS IS THE WORST THAT THE LAW WILL INFLICT

(and that's if you are even caught)

then

CRIME IS WORTH THE RISK

AND

PUBLIC OUTRAGE IS IGNORED.

The explanation is quite logical. Politicians are typically driven by

TWO THINGS.

THE FIRST is the PURSUIT OF POWER

the most exciting thing in the world, or even some say, the first.  If this urge is not there when they start their political careers

THEN IT SOON TAKES OVER.

THEIR SECOND MOTIVATION -to give our politicians their due - is the DESIRE FOR REFORM, IMPROVE the condition of the PEOPLE.

But the catch here is that most politicians

 THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE FAR BETTER THAN THEMSELVES.

THEY FORM AN ELITE

WHICH LISTENS TO

OTHER ELITES

Or perhaps, since the word elite sounds flattering, we should say

THEY FORM A CASTE.

 

Politicians do not wake each morning wondering whether they are meeting the public will.  They turn to the media to learn what is said about them in newspapers and on the radio by other members of the

NATIONAL ELITE

- the selectorate, the clattering classes, the scribblers, the intellectually fashionable, call them what you will.

 

For elites to be out of touch is not unusual, even inevitable. The desire to be 'in' with the 'right' people is common with politicians; their weakness is for approval (and fame).

Of course, there is one moment when public opinion cannot be ignored -and that is at an

ELECTION

As Rousseau observed, voters are truly free

ONLY

 ON

ELECTION DAY.

But , by then, all the issues are jumbled up, and the voter finds himself choosing between

TWO COMPLEX and CONFUSING MENUS.

And while it is clearly advantageous for a party to offer the public

WHAT IT WANTS, the fact that both main parties say MUCH THE SAME THING..

-and make similar insincere

PROMISES

makes a mockery of any claim to be driven by

PUBLIC WILL.

 

BUT  the ALTERNATIVE to our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM politicians say in horror, would be GOVERNMENT by REFERENDUMS. With 'horror' because it would take power from THEM and give it to THE PEOPLE.

BUT WHY NOT?

The Swiss have made a suburb success of it. Referendums are required on national and local issues if enough voters petition for them and they often do. As a result, the Federal Government, like  the local CANTON administrations, proceeds with CAUTION in case its plans are overturned by a PUBLIC VOTE. . .

To acknowledge that our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, which has developed over the centuries, NO LONGER WORKS -MAY BE PAINFUL. But if you put that to a REFERENDUM,

MOST VOTERS WOULD HEARTILY AGREE.

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

 *

HOME

[brought forward from June-2008

AUGUST-2008

*

[ 'IN JANUARY 2018 we can look back over 10 years and see that the situation with regard to many matters mentioned above has got progressively WORSE! Whether it is IMMIGRATION-POLICING-LAWS...The only GOOD NEWS is that we are only just over a year away from leaving the monstrous soon to be containment camp know as the EU SUPER-STATE a plan of ADOLF-HITLER in 1940 for GERMANY to dominate Europe in the PEACE .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[brought forward from June-2008

 

 
 
 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
 
 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

MEN

STILL DYING

OF

EMBARRASSMENT'

 

 

 

About 5,350,000 results
 

    News for DAILY MAIL-MEN STILL DYING OF EMBARRASSMENT


    Daily Mail
    Prostate cancer victims still dying of embarrassment
    Daily Mail - 14 hours ago
    Men are still dying of prostate cancer because they are too embarrassed to visit a
    doctor, a study of patients in England has revealed.

 

 

    News for DAILY MAIL-LET'S SAVE 7,000 LIVES A YEAR

    Let's save lives of 7000 prostate cancer sufferers a year
    Daily Mail - 3 days ago
    Boosting prostate cancer funding to match cash for breast cancer could save the
    lives of 7000 men a year, according to Prostate Cancer UK.

 

Daily Mail

CAMPAIGN

 

FEBRUARY 3, 2018

H.F.1464

 

 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

THIS IS :

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018