MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018-(1994 -Official Website -M AY-PT1-(2018)- -MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2 -2018

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018          MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018-

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018          MAY-FREEDOM NOW- NEW-HOME--2018

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

IMMIGRATION- ARCHIVE-EU FILE   BULLETIN FILE     IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

PETER OBORNE

ON POLITICS AND POWER

 

FORGET BREXIT,

ITALY COULD TRIGGER THE COLLAPSE OF THE EU

 

PETER OBORNE: Forget Brexit, Italy and its ragbag coalition's

 hatred of Brussels could trigger the could trigger the collapse of the

EU


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5773311/PETER-OBORNE-Forget-Brexit-Italy-trigger-collapse-EU.html#ixzz5GbZp6IUa
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Every day, the road to Brexit seems to get bumpier. The mixed messages coming from Downing Street certainly don’t help.

The latest confusion was caused when, on the one hand, the Government’s Chief Whip, Julian Smith, said he plans to bring the EU (Withdrawal) Bill back to the Commons for a vote earlier than expected, in a move that pleased Brexiteers who want to face down Remain MPs as soon as possible.

However, on the other hand, Downing Street was briefing that the Government may give hope to Remainers by asking the EU for a second Brexit transition period to run until 2023.

No wonder so many of the 17.4 million who voted Leave are getting deeply frustrated.

 

The new prime minister, Guiseppe Conte, heads a rag-bag coalition of the anti-Establishment Five Star Movement and the far-right League

But while Brussels negotiators continue to stymie Brexit, European politicians are facing a much bigger threat to the European Union.

I refer to events of the past few days in Italy, which will be Europe’s third largest economy after Britain leaves the European Union.

This week, a new government was formed — Italy’s 66th since the end of World War II.

The new prime minister, Guiseppe Conte, heads a rag-bag coalition of the anti-Establishment Five Star Movement and the far-right League.

They agree on very little but there is one policy on which they are in harmony: a hatred of Brussels.

It is no exaggeration to say that Mr Conte, a former law professor at Florence University, has the power to bring about the collapse of the EU.

He came to power on a wave of burning national resentment over Italy’s membership of the EU, which millions of Italians believe has been an unmitigated disaster for their country.

Above all, there is the problem of immigration, which was a key issue in March’s elections.

Brussels’s freedom of movement rules are blamed for record numbers of migrants in the country.

At least one million, for example, have settled in Italy from Romania, a fellow EU member. But huge numbers have made their homes in Italy after crossing the Mediterranean from North Africa.

From Libya alone in the past four years, an estimated 600,000 migrants and refugees have reached Italy.

 

Five-Star Movement leader, Luigi Di Maio, leaves from a restaurant in the centre of Rome

These people know that once on Italian soil, they have a very good chance of being able to begin a new life there or exploit freedom of movement to live in any other of the 28 countries in the EU.

Italy’s new government has pledged to deport up to half a million migrants, to clear illegal gipsy settlements in towns and cities, and to recruit more police and build new prisons to deal with the problems.

This hardline reaction to Brussels’s soft approach to illegal immigration amounts to a huge challenge to its authority and imperils the cohesion of the EU.

But immigration is not the only issue over which Italy’s new government is at war with Brussels.

The country, once an economic success story almost as remarkable as Germany’s, has been brought to its knees by Brussels.

This tragedy dates back to Italy’s decision to join the euro at its launch in 1999. It proved to be a calamitous error.

With its own currency, the lira, the Italian government was able to manage its own affairs and devalue its currency if necessary to make itself competitive.

However, the euro has imposed a financial strait-jacket which has led to the closure of thousands of businesses, with millions of people put out of work.

Shockingly, Italy has not seen any cumulative economic growth since it signed up to the European single currency.

The Italian people know that their membership of the EU is to blame for mass unemployment, social collapse and uncontrolled migration. The new Italian PM, Mr Conte, is the first political leader to genuinely represent the national mood of outrage — and sorrow — at their post-lira impoverishment.

Italy’s national debt is a staggering 132 per cent of its Gross Domestic Product — the second highest in the EU, after Greece.

 

The new prime minister, Guiseppe Conte, heads a rag-bag coalition of the anti-Establishment Five Star Movement and the far-right League

To try to prevent a crisis of ever bigger proportions, the European Central Bank lent Italy €600 billion (about half a trillion pounds sterling) in order to stop it going bankrupt.

Meanwhile, Mr Conte is promising tax cuts and public spending increases to try to undo the damage to his country’s economy.

As night follows day, though, the Brussels bully-boys — the same ones who have been trying to block Brexit — will threaten him with dire consequences unless he backs down.

We witnessed a similar stand-off when Greece’s economy hit the rocks and had to be bailed out with billions of euros in loans from Brussels.

The Greek people reacted to this national humiliation by voting for a vehemently anti-EU government three years ago.

But they were then shabbily let down when their new prime minister, Alexis Tsipras, abjectly caved in to the strong-arm tactics of European leaders.

Mr Conte is unlikely to yield in the same way.

Italy is ten times bigger than Greece. Unlike Greece, Italy is too big to fail.

It is quite possible that Mr Conte will threaten that Italy will pull out of the euro — a move that would instil terror in Brussels and Frankfurt.

Returning to the lira would be a desperate measure, but it would be the economically sane thing to do.

It would give the Italian economy a chance to be competitive again and end the stagnation and mass unemployment which have wrecked countless hundreds of thousands of lives over two decades.

 

Theresa May takes a break from Brexit as she enjoy the action at Lord's cricket ground

Leaving the euro would mean that Italy would renege on its €600 billion in loans from the European Central Bank.

Without doubt, the bank would collapse. The EU would go into financial and political meltdown.

The ineluctable truth is that Italy is now a ticking time bomb, and I fear it is only a question of time before it explodes, with consequences for the continent which are impossible to predict.

How ironic that the founders of the EU’s predecessor, the EEC, were driven in part by a desire to prevent a repeat of the terrible bloodshed of the two great wars of the 20th century, but their hubristic attempts at political and economic union have instead created division and hatred.

Europe is not just creaking — it is falling apart.

Is it any surprise the British people had the good sense to vote to leave the EU?

*  *  *

 

The worrying message: Britain approves torture 

 

Two weeks have passed since Theresa May apologised for the Blair government’s role in the kidnap and torture of Libyan dissident Abdul Hakim Belhaj.

Mrs May was not to blame for this repugnant case. The two men most responsible were then Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and MI6 official Sir Mark Allen.

Yet Straw remains a Privy Councillor and Allen keeps his knighthood. Both men have brought shame on Britain, and if they aren’t stripped of their honours it will suggest that the British State approves of torture.

 
*

One of the fiercest critics of the Prime Minister’s handling of

Brexit

has been the Institute of Directors, the organisation representing Britain’s most senior business people.

What a pity that it cannot handle its own affairs. Membership has almost halved from 55,000 in 2005 to just over 30,000 today.

H.F.1556

*  *  *

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Leaving the European Union is taking longer than it did to defeat Hitler and his Nazi Germany

732

View
comments

What right does Soros have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy?

Two years down the drain. Two years of vacillation, obfuscation, cowardice, sabotage and outright betrayal. And that's just from our own Government.

 

On June 23, 2016, in a referendum, 17.4 million people voted to leave the European Union.

No ifs, no buts.

The question on the ballot paper was unambiguous, the so-called catastrophic consequences spelled out in plain English in a brochure distributed to every single home in the country by a Government which was desperate to Remain.

Campaigning was exhaustive, lasting six whole months. We knew exactly what voting Leave would mean. 

 

No single market, no customs union,

 no more submitting to the jurisdiction of European courts. 

Recent developments could mean leaving the European Union will take longer than it did to defeat Hitler and Nazi Germany, writes Richard Littlejohn

We would be retaking control of our borders, our laws, our traditional territorial waters and our national destiny.

Project Fear did its worst and failed. More people voted Leave than have ever voted for anything in our history. By now, we should be as good as gone, with only a few minor details to be ironed out.

Yet two years on, just as I feared, we're no nearer the exit. Every day seems to bring yet another blatant attempt to derail the process, to keep us subjugated in perpetuity as prisoners of a sclerotic, anti-democratic European superstate.

The latest comes from a group bankrolled by the billionaire hedge funder George Soros, a Hungarian-born American who made his fortune betting against the pound on Black Wednesday in 1992.

Having earned the nickname of the Man Who Broke The Bank Of England, he is now determined to become The Man Who Broke The Will Of The British People.

What right does Soros have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy?

Yet the same people here who are squealing about Russia meddling in the U.S. election (because that delivered the 'wrong' result, too) are cheering him on.

This self-appointed fifth column will stop at nothing to overturn the referendum result. The stitch-up started the moment the result was announced.

We've had endless legal challenges, and the disgraceful attempts by the unelected, self-serving Lords to stop Brexit.

Project Fear — far from admitting it lost fair and square, packing up its tent and going home —has been ramping up the volume, aided and abetted by the BBC, the Financial Times and the political establishment.

The head of Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, John Thompson, joined in this week, warning that technology designed to keep trade flowing seamlessly after Brexit would cost businesses £20 billion and take at least three years to introduce after the proposed 'transition' period is due to end.

 

What right does [George] Soros (pictured) have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy? Asks Richard Littlejohn

Such a delay would keep us in the customs union until December 2023. That's seven years after we voted Leave — longer than it took us to defeat Nazi Germany.

Thompson obviously hadn't read Robert Hardman's brilliant dispatch in last Saturday's Mail from the port of Felixstowe, where a comparable system works without a hitch and could easily be applied elsewhere, including the Irish border.

The governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, a siren voice of Project Fear, waded back in by claiming every British family would be 'up to potentially' £900 a year worse off after Brexit.

What does 'up to potentially' actually mean? I'll tell you — he made it up. It's a guess, pure and simple. This figure is about as accurate as all the other scaremongering forecasts the Bank put out during the referendum.

Carney, a Canadian, is one of the worst of the Remoaner stooges. He's supposed to be independent, but owes his job to the political establishment. 

He maintains Brexit will be a retrograde step, an economic disaster, but at the same time is said to harbour ambitions of becoming the next Prime Minister of proudly independent Canada.

So let him explain something. This time last year, I was sitting in a waterfront seafood restaurant on the Detroit River, looking across at Windsor, Ontario.

The distance from the U.S. to Canada at this point is about the width of the Thames at Dartford. 

The governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, a siren voice of Project Fear, waded back in by claiming every British family would be 'up to potentially' £900 a year worse off after Brexit

Every day thousands of trucks trundle across the border in either direction, carrying imports and exports of everything from car components to Canadian bacon.

If Carney does stand as PM, will he tell his fellow countrymen that all this trade will have to stop unless they agree to be ruled by America, have their laws decided in Washington and surrender the right to decide who lives in their country? Of course not.

So why should the prosperity of Britain, the world's fifth biggest economy, be determined by whether or not we belong to the EU and take orders from Brussels? 

Look, we expect Remoaners to insult our intelligence, tell us we were too stupid to know what we were voting for, and fight to the last ditch to stop us leaving.

We just have to live with it, although I can do without the constant bombardment of anti-Brexit lies and intimidation masquerading as 'news' which seems to dominate every TV and radio bulletin.

Labour is a lost cause, too. Despite promising in its last manifesto to respect the Brexit vote, Labour is now only interested in bringing down the Government — even if that means betraying the millions of traditional Labour supporters who voted Leave.

My biggest worry all along has been the Tory Government itself, even before Theresa May sacrificed her majority in that vainglorious General Election last year.

Regular readers will know I'm no fan of Mother Theresa. I thought Boris deserved the job when Call Me Dave committed hara-kiri. 

He was the figurehead for the Leave campaign and the spoils should have gone to the victor.

Theresa May's (pictured) inherent indecision, which has characterised her career, has enabled the opponents of Brexit to seize the initiative at every turn

If he'd screwed up, we'd be no worse off than we are now. At least Boris believed — and still believes — in Brexit and is about the only Cabinet voice making an optimistic case for our bright global future once we can break free of the EU yoke.

Frankly, I've never thought Mother Theresa was up to the job. I'm not even sure her heart is in leaving the EU, despite promising that 'Brexit means Brexit'.

She's bungled the negotiations, has been captured by the Civil Service and has allowed herself to be bullied not just by Barnier and his team, but by the Remainiacs in her own party.

Tory Brexiteers aren't 'rebels', as they are frequently described disparagingly. They were on the winning side and speak for 17.4 million people, outside the Westminster bubble, not a handful of hardcore metropolitan malcontents.

May's inherent indecision, which has characterised her career, has enabled the opponents of Brexit to seize the initiative at every turn.

She should never have agreed to give the EU a penny, let alone £39 billion as a basis for negotiation, and she should have simply ignored their cynical posturing over the Irish border. 

Allowing them to raise the spectre of a return to violence was monstrous.

They're doing it again over the Galileo satellite project, saying the UK will be denied vital defence intelligence. 

Two can play at that game. Our response should be to tell the EU that they can forget about any co-operation from GCHQ, Scotland Yard and British security services.

And anyway, our American allies have got a perfectly good satellite system which they are happy to share with us. Have a nice day.

Mrs May hasn't had a bad three months, after her trials and tribulations last year. Is it too much to hope that she might be emboldened to take a tougher line on Brexit, at home and abroad.

She should start immediately by creating 800 new peers. They will only be appointed if they agree to two conditions: 1) Vote through all Brexit legislation. 2) Once that's done, they must vote for the abolition of the House of Lords.

Their reward will be that they can keep the titles, which will help them secure a few directorships and jump the queue at fashionable restaurants. Trust me, there'd be no shortage of applicants.

As I've long maintained, we won't get an acceptable deal from the EU negotiators unless Mrs May is prepared to walk away, Renee. Shamefully, the Government seems ill prepared for No Deal.

Nobody should need reminding that Europe has more to lose than Britain — both economically and militarily. 

Surrendering to every demand from Brussels is not, and should not be, an option. Nor is trying to appease the Remainers in her own party.

Do the Soubrys, Morgans and Grieves really want to risk bringing down their own Government and ushering in the Corbyn terror? May should read them the riot act — not demonise Jacob Rees-Mogg, who is only speaking for the majority of voters.

If the PM has learned one thing this year it is that standing up to bullies pays off. Her popularity and reputation rocketed at home and abroad when she faced down Putin over the Salisbury poisoning.

If Mother Theresa can find the courage to stand up to Russia, then isn't it time, after two years of vacillation and capitulation, that she summoned up the backbone to face down the EU?

 

[BUT WILL SHE?]

*

 


READ  MORE: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5769361/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-Brexit-taking-longer-defeating-Hitler-Nazi-Germany.html#ixzz5GW1KGJ2C
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on FAcebook

 

H.F.1555

*  *  *

THERESA MAY'S SURRENDER

 TO

HITLER'S LAIR

IN

SEPTEMBER 2017

 IS REMINISCENT

OF

PRIME MINISTER NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN'S

LACK OF GRIT

IN

1938

WHICH LED TO WORLD WAR 11 IN SEPTEMBER 1939

AS THEN WE HAVE THE PHONEY WAR AND THE

BATTLE FOR BRITAIN.

What would those who died protecting our skies in 1940 think of the GREAT BETRAYAL by fellow citizens to their FOE of TWO WORLD WARS-

GERMANY

IN 2017 WE haven't  even had our Dunkirk as we haven't in reality even crossed the Channel to claim our FREEDOM after 15 months since a majority voted for the return of THEIR COUNTRY LAW-CUSTOM- given away by TRAITORS in 1972.

 

BEING IN THE UNDERBELLY OF EUROPE WON'T HELP ONE IOTA!-GERMANY IS ADJUDICATOR!

WE HAVE STALEMATE!

THE ANSWER IS TO BOYCOTT GOODS FROM FRANCE AND GERMANY WHO ARE THE DRIVER AND FIREMAN OF THE EU EXPRESS.

WE BUY MORE FROM EUROPE THAN THEY BUY FROM US!

BUSINESSES IN THE MAIN  SUPPORT THE EU

WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A WAR OF SORTS!

REMEMBER!

WE ARE NOT DEALING WITH A DEMOCRATIC BODY BUT WITH THE HITLERITE -AUTOCRATIC EU

*

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

***

TREASON

 

comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length. We mentioned at the time that  a distance between them would have given more confidence that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

 

APRIL 9,2018

 

H.F.1525/1

In November 2005 we put the following bulletin

Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

 

 on our EDP WEBSITE

SEPTEMBER 2017

H.F1321 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLAN FOR EUROPE

*  *  *

 

 BROUGHT-FORWARD FROM NOVEMBER-2005

Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

 

SO WHY DIDN'T WE?

*

 

A further article from the ONLY sole INDEPENDENT world-wide respected International Currency Review under the heading:

 

*

 

*

CAN BRITAIN WITHHOLD ITS EC CONTRIBUTIONS?

 

PERTINENT LEGAL ADVICE BY LEOLIN PRICE, QUEEN’S COUNSEL

 

The following Legal Opinion was provided by the distinguished veteran constitutional lawyer, Leolin Price QC, in response to a request to consider the following questions:

1. )  Can ministers of the Crown be held culpable for the misuse of UK taxpayers’ money (i.e., of UK Government funds) by the European Commission and/or European Union; and

2. ) Can Britain withhold its contributions to the EC budget on the ground that UK taxpayers’ funds are being misused (embezzled, defrauded, misappropriated, misallocated, misrepresented, etc)? But in reality, these questions are themselves superfluous since, as exposed in this issue [of International Currency Review-Vol 30,4 dated October 10-2005, cstory@worldreports.org

 

  Britain’s EU membership was procured fraudulently, so that under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Britain has every right to leave the EU unilaterally and to cease payment.

 

1.    I preface this Opinion by acknowledging that I am not aware of any precedent for the sort of proceedings in court against Ministers of the Crown, whether civil or criminal, which I am asked to consider.

2.                  But there are two relevant principles of English law to be borne firmly in mind: first, that the King (or Queen) can do no wrong [We must make it clear at the outset that this does not include King Tony-whatever he may think]; secondly, that every subject of the Queen is subject to the RULE OF LAW and equal before the law.  There is no special privilege or status for Ministers or other officers of the Crown.

 

They are vulnerable and ought to be answerable in our courts if something which they have done is not properly authorised by law, infringes the rights of individuals and causes damage.

3.There is also learning about when an officer of the Crown can plead, as a defence to a claim by someone who has suffered from some act of that officer, that what was done was an ‘Act of State’.  A British subject cannot sue the Queen (because the ‘Queen can do no wrong’); and if an act, of which a British subject complains of, is in civil law, a tort, the officer cannot assert that the act complained of was an act, which had been authorised by the Crown (in reality the Government).

 

The Act of State is not available to the officer in that situation.  He must, if he can, show that what was done was a lawful exercise of some power lawfully conferred by

Act of Parliament

Or

Otherwise:

 

See, for example, Johnson v Peglar [1921] 2AC 262.

 

4.)             But a somewhat different line of modern authority R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p Smedley [1985] AC657 recognises that a person – in ex p Smedley, a British taxpayer and elector – may have a ‘sufficient interest’ to bring judicial review proceedings against Government authorities and Ministers.

 

·    Can Ministers of the Crown be held culpable for the misuse of taxpayers’ money (i.e. of UK Government funds) by the European union?

5.)             This is the first – and primary – question on which I am asked to advise [Leolin Price, Queen’s Counsel]

6.)             My answer is that our Courts will not recognise that any direct responsibility is imposed by Government or the Chancellor of the Exchequer for the subsequent application, by the Commission of the European Communities Act or the EU, of our taxpayers’ money which is paid over in accordance with the established legal procedures for making our contributions to the European Union.

7.)             But the history and circumstances of fraud, at the centre of the European Union and in ‘Member States’, and the conspicuous failure of the Commission or the European Union to establish any proper (and obviously necessary) accountancy controls over what happens to the money which is provided by ‘Member States’, has produced a situation in which the British elector and taxpayer may reasonably consider that it is a failure of duty for the Government, Chancellor of the Chequer and treasury to go on handing over our money to what he may reasonably consider is an organisation which is incapable of doing and unwilling to do, anything effective about the corrupt and fraudulent diversion of EU funds.  The history of incapacity and unwillingness includes the following:

(1)    The resignation of the whole Commission upon its acknowledgement of collective responsibility for corruption and fraud.

(2)    In spite of that admission of collective responsibility, the continuation in office of all but one of the resigned Commissioners.

(3)    A continuing failure to establish a minimum of accounting controls over the Commission’s expenditure of money at the centre or within ‘Member States’

(4)    Failure by the Commission, in response to acknowledged and massive misuse of EU money, to establish any regime with a minimum of efficiency and designed in accordance with modern accountancy standards to monitor the expenditure of EU money and to minimise its misuse.

(5)    The apparent inability of the Commission to prevent, or reasonably to combat and control, the corrupt and fraudulent misuse of EU money, including contributions from the United Kingdom.

 

8.           Faced with that history, a UK elector and taxpayer could reasonably expect his Government to suspend, wholly or partly, the further contribution of money from the United Kingdom to the European Union in the continuing absence of proper EU accountancy and controls to combat and contain fraud and corruption and other misuse of EU money; and could reasonably expect English Courts to support his claim for such suspension.

9.           In the circumstances, and before the next instalment of the UK contribution to the EU is to be paid, a UK taxpayer could apply for permission to bring judicial review proceedings challenging the making of the payment on the ground that no responsible Minister of Department of OUR Government could regard it as appropriate to pay over money without any reasonable expectation or even hope that the recipient EU institutions have made any reasonable arrangements to avoid its being, with other EU money, misused.  Experience, especially experience since the collective resignation of the Commission [in 1999], indicates that the money so contributed will be at serious risk of not being used for the purposes for which our Treaty obligations and our law require it to be contributed [sic].

10.  Will such judicial review proceed -ings be successful? The practical and realistic answer is that the [English] Courts will be reluctant to permit the review; but there is a presentable argument, and although there is no previous reported case which provides a precise precedent, it represents a logical development of what has been recognised in reported cases; and the continuing scandal about misuse of EU money provides ground for seriously contending that judicial review ought to be, and is, available to stop exposing UK money to the obvious risk of EU failure to avoid misuse.

11.      The withholding of Treaty-required contributions, which are at serious risk of not being properly used for Treaty purposes, is not-or arguably, is not- a breach of Treaty obligations. [Editor; However as is shown in this issue – of International Currency Review Vol 30,4 the treaty obligations themselves are not applicable,

since the

British Accession Treaty, and collective treaties, were signed for corrupt reward by agents of a Foreign Power.]

12.  The argument will be that the Chancellor of the Exchequer, as a Crown servant, is a guardian of taxpayers’ money and it is a breach of the duties involved in that guardianship to pay over money which, in the hands of the recipient Commission and the EU, will be at such serious risk of misuse.  The First defence will be that the payment is required by our Treaty obligations and by Acts of Parliament; but the answer to that is that the Treaty obligations and Parliament provide authority for payment to support Treaty purposes and NOT to expose the money to established and substantial risk of misuse.

13.   An alternative form of proceedings might be criminal proceedings against the Chancellor for misuse of public money under his control.  The argument for this is that the payment is a serious breach of public duty:  it condones and encourages and facilitates the misuse, and the misuse is foreseeable.  Those instructing me may consider it worthwhile attempting such a criminal case; and it may be that the launching of such a criminal case will achieve judicial discussion of the public duty and its breach.  It is, nevertheless, my opinion that such criminal proceedings will not be successful.

14.      , The better choice of proceedings is judicial review.

 

19th October 2004.

Leolin Price CBE QC,

10 Old Square,

Lincoln’s Inn,

London.

  [Font altered-bolding & underling used-comments in brackets]

 

*         *          *

NOV/05

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

 

 

  [BROUGHT FORWARD FROM NOVEMBER 2005.]

 

H.F.1295-FREEDOM IS OUR RIGHT!

 

 

*  *  *

[Heaven Only Knows!]
 

A load of unholy cobblers: When QUENTIN LETTS like all Church volunteers was forced to attend an abuse prevention course he entered a chilling world where everyone is assumed to be evil

Last Saturday, when there was no shortage of lawn-mowing to be done, I was obliged to spend four hours with a former detective. If that sounds alarming, it was, though not for the reason you might suppose.

The retired female cop, who in the name of Christian discretion we will call Wendy, was the ‘safeguarding officer’ of our local diocese of the Church of England. Her creed? ‘I assume nothing,’ she said. ‘I believe no one. I tend to suspect the worst in people.’

As deputy churchwarden and a member of our village’s parochial church council, or PCC (a group of about 15 volunteers), I had been ordered to undergo Wendy’s C1 Learning and Development Framework Safeguarding Core Module.

 
 

As deputy churchwarden and a member of our village’s parochial church council, or PCC (a group of about 15 volunteers), I had been ordered to undergo Wendy’s C1 Learning and Development Framework Safeguarding Core Module

Apologies for the jargon. I am afraid there is going to be rather a lot of that. And this from an Anglican hierarchy that has largely abandoned Thomas Cranmer’s Book of Common Prayer because ‘no one understands it any more’.

For the next four hours, my fellow church volunteers, one aged 100 and one a septuagenarian Austrian countess, and I were battered and splattered by gibberish. It was like standing in front of some muckspreader loaded with stinking bureaucrat-ese.

The thrust of Wendy’s message was that there could be a pederast behind every churchyard yew tree. Just as station Tannoys command us to ‘see it, say it, sorted’ and report any suspect package, Wendy told us to be alert to all forms of abuse — sexual, inter-marital, even abuse of vulnerable churchgoers by over-zealous preachers — throughout our communities.

‘Listen, hear, pass it on. But don’t ever go into the judgment bit,’ intoned Wendy.

If we heard neighbours squabbling at night, children with bruises or a church member taking a lot of photos on his mobile, we should sidle up to the authorities and submit a report. We should not ourselves reach any conclusion, mind you. We must allow ‘the experts to carry out an investigation’.

The Stasi secret police in communist East Germany used to get citizens to snoop on their neighbours. Now this message is being pushed by the Church of England.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, sees safeguarding as his mission. Past archbishops have been known for their emphasis on liturgical novelty or inspiring church music or even, Heaven help us, promoting Christian values. Yet Archbishop Welby — for, I am sure, the best of motives — has put his trust in a belt-and-garters approach to spotting wrong ’uns.

 
 

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, sees safeguarding as his mission. Past archbishops have been known for their emphasis on liturgical novelty or inspiring church music or even, Heaven help us, promoting Christian values. Yet Archbishop Welby — for, I am sure, the best of motives — has put his trust in a belt-and-garters approach to spotting wrong ’uns.

So it was on Saturday that, after introducing ourselves like attendees at an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting (actually, most of us already knew one another), we were given leaflets about safeguarding strategy and action plans, a diocesan working group, independent safeguarding audits and about the team (modern clerics love the word ‘team’) of ‘expert safeguarding professionals’ at Church House, in London.

There was a list of safeguarding policy and practice guidance, publications such as ‘Responding to Domestic Abuse’ and ‘Responding Well to those who have been Sexually Abused’.

We were urged to mug up on ‘managing safeguarding concerns or allegations against church officers’ and forcefully told we should ‘formally adopt national safeguarding policy and practice guidelines on a yearly basis and display a safeguarding policy statement in a prominent place’ at our place of worship.

 

Look closely enough at the notice board outside your parish church and you may spot it: alongside the yellowing advert for last year’s bring-and-buy there will be your church’s mandatory small print about how it’s on the lookout for kiddy-fiddlers.

Let’s hope the wind doesn’t rip it away, or the church’s insurance policy may be rendered invalid.

On Wendy’s course it was drummed into us that the Church’s main insurance company will pay out on claims only if PCCs have followed the national safeguarding policy and practice guidelines, as enforced by the Safeguarding and Clergy Discipline Measure 2016.

The lawyers and their friends in modern officialdom (and the insurance business) have plainly got the system royally gummed-up.

The modern Church hierarchy may not be much good at inspiring worshippers, it may have a banjo-Billy tin ear for hymns and it may have presided over a catastrophic slump in churchgoing, but when it comes to making sure volunteers darn well do as they’re told and ensuring that a fortune is spent on bureaucrats who are paid much more than vicars and organists, it is horribly efficient.

Had I refused to attend this course, I would have been sacked, insofar as any volunteer can be sacked. I would have been told that, under recent laws which sailed through Parliament with minimal debate, I could no longer be a church ‘officer’. That term applies not only to clergy and professional employees of the Church, but also to lay volunteers.

There are some 12,500 parishes in England and each has a PCC. The Church could not say, but there are probably about 180,000 PCC members in the country, all unpaid, most of them (except for me) kindly, positive-minded, patient people.

As Wendy churned through her litany of modern sex-crime tendencies and extreme instances of abuse by churchgoers, some of my fellow attendees started to twitch.

OK, one or two seemed prepared to become unpaid snoopers for the professionalised nanny state, squealing on neighbours who were unkind to their wives or who left their children alone at home when they went to the pub or to work.

But others, in the politest way, started to bridle. The Austrian countess told me afterwards, rather perplexed: ‘I thought the English believed in minding their own business.’

Wendy said we should never let volunteers (such as flower arrangers) work alone in the church. If unaccompanied, she said, they could lay themselves open to false allegations. Visitors might invent some story that a volunteer had abused them.

And that would lead to the police swooping in and arresting Mrs Boggins! ‘Gotcha, sunshine, you’re coming to the nick,’ says PC Plod.

‘Oh dear, Constable,’ says Mrs Boggins, ‘do you mind if I just put this sprig of gypsophila in the oasis before we are taken to the high-security unit for suspected sex offenders?’

Have the Justin Welbys of this world ever run the volunteer side of a church? If so, they might know it is far from easy to find enough souls to cover the basics, let alone to ‘double up on your rotas, guys’, as Wendy instructed us.

Until recently, the only risk- assessing we did was trying to calculate if our little church would go bust in the next few months. Most of the money we raise (about £8,000 a year from collections, fetes, etc) goes to the diocese, to pay for the Church hierarchy.

Here is the same Church spending millions on safeguarding jobsworths who tell us to report suspect activity and thus create more work for their self-perpetuating bureaucracy.

As a mere lay person, I am no authority on morality, but I’d call that wicked.

How can a Church built on faith allow one of its representatives to boast, as Wendy did, ‘I believe no one and I suspect the worst in people’ and to tell us to keep our eyes perpetually peeled for ‘Mr Nasty’?

Wendy spoke approvingly of a possibility that the Church will soon tell priests no longer to do solo home visits, such as when they give Communion to the dying or offer spiritual consolation.

She wanted such visits to be accompanied to prevent accusations of rape or theft being made against a priest.

The ancient rite of the confessional may soon be trumped by the demands of today’s managerialists. That is appalling.

Unless, that is, the decent, push-us-only-so-far PCC members — the backbone of Anglican England — go on strike. Without its volunteers, the Church of England would close in a week. We PCC members maintain the buildings, organs, pews, graveyards.

We spread the word, find the organists and raise the funds. Yet now we are being told to waste our spare free time attending almost meaningless safeguarding courses, just to tick bureaucratic boxes.

I know several PCC members in our diocese, including a churchwarden who is a pillar of the county, who intend to quit rather than succumb to any safeguarding course. ‘The bishop can get stuffed,’ I have been told.

Wendy is demanding that I soon surrender to another course, and then repeat the whole exercise in three years’ time.

I love our church. Despite a wobbly faith, I have a desire to serve our parish. But if I have to listen to church representatives spouting the doctrine of politically correct, self-enriching bureaucrats, I’m not sure being a PCC member will be worth the altar candle.

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5742871/QUENTIN-LETTS-like-Church-volunteers-forced-attend-abuse-prevention-course.html#ixzz5Fr528UB3
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

'The cause of Freedom is the cause of God'

Edmund Burke.78]

'True religion is the foundation of society, the basis on which all true civil government rests, and from which power derives its authority, laws their efficacy, and both their sanction.  If it is once shaken by contempt, the whole fabric cannot be stable or lasting.-

Edmund Burke.

'Awake, arise, or be for ever fall'n.'  [Ib.1.330]

Milton

'Better to reign in hell than serve in heav'n.['Ib.1.263]

MILTON

'A mind not to be changed by place or time/The mind is its own place, and in itself/ Can make a heav'n of hell, a hell of heav'n.'[Ib.263]

MILTON

*  *  *

 

 

H.F.1551

 

*  *  *

 

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 
 

OH, HOW they must be laughing their socks off in Brussels. Why, they chortle, should we bother opposing the UK's exit from the EU, when the country's own unelected political Establishment is doing so brilliantly for us?

On Tuesday night, in one of the greatest constitutional scandals of the post war years, Remainer peers inflicted their 14th successive defeat on the Government's Brexit legislation, seemingly blissfully unaware that they are cutting their throats with a public who are utterly repelled by their

 TREACHERY and ARROGANCE.

But then, when they have jobs for life, accountable to

NOBODY

is it any surprise that they are so smugly convinced they know better than the 'little people' they despise?

Indeed, these unelected cronies, dodgy party donors, superannuated political hacks and washed-up

BRUSSELS STOOGES

threaten to plunge this country into a democratic crisis that could destroy every last vestige of voters faith in the way we are governed.

Even among Remain voters, increasing numbers are appalled by the way the Upper House  is overstepping its powers in its efforts to saboage Brexit and render the referendum meaningless.

And make no mistake

Though most Remainer peers may peddle the monstrous fiction that they are merely performing their duties as a revising chamber, their true aim is nothing less than to

OVERTURN THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE

as expressed by the voters in

JUNE 2016.

 

For the record, that referendum was authorised by a

SOVEREIGN ACT OF PARLIAMENT

[AS in 1975 - when the Remainers won their day]

passed by a majority of six to one in the Commons ,with politicians on both sides of the argument agreeing

THAT THE RESULT WOULD BE BINDING.

*

On June 23,2016, 17.4 million voted

LEAVE

giving the biggest democratic mandate for any party or policy in

BRITISH HISTORY

on a turnout of

72 per cent

Parliament then made  the decision to trigger

 Article 50

starting the two-year countdown to

BREXIT

this time by

498 votes to 114 in the Commons.

In short, the Remoaner peer's pretence that they are defending the constitution is just a cynical sham. On the Contrary they risk smashing the constitution to smithereens.

Look no further than those 14 amendments they have passed so far. These are no mere tweaks to the Government's legislation, in line with the Lords' role of ironing out anomalies and improving wording of ambiguous clauses. They are bare naked attempts to sabotage the Bill - and with it, BREXIT itself

Take the vote to rule out a 'no-deal' withdrawal, and so ban negotiators from walking away from the table no matter how lousy the terms the EU may choose to offer.

Not only would this rob of us of the most powerful card in our hand, while removing any incentive for Brussels to make concessions. It could also postpone Brexit indefinitely - which is precisely what the blinkered and besotted Europhiles want.

Indeed, Cobra beer tycoon Lord Bilimoria gave the ugly game away when he blurted out ten days ago: 'It is Parliament, thanks to this amendment, that will have the ability to stop the train crash that is Brexit.'

Then there are the amendments aimed at keeping us shackled to the customs union and the single market-the later passed by a majority of 29 on Tuesday night. Though  you wouldn't know it from the BBC's coverage, both represent shattering assaults on the

VERDICT OF THE ELECTORATE.

How Jean-Claude Juncker and his chief negotiator Michel Barnier must marvel at the stupidity of our ruling class as it weakens Britain's negotiators, betrays our exporters and relentlessly talks our country down.

With egregious arrogance , Remoaners seek to justify their conduct by saying voters were too stupid or ill-informed to understand Brexit's complexities. Others preposterously claim there is no contradiction between honouring the referendum result and remaining in the customs union and single market..

Yet as the Europhiles are fully aware, both sides in the referendum campaign spelt out repeatedly and emphatically that

WITHDRAWING FROM THE EU WOULD MEAN LEAVING ITS TWO PRINCIPLE INSTITUTIONS.

Indeed, voters went to the ballot box with their eyes and ears wide open. And despite the deafening hysteria of

PROJECT FEAR

the majority determined to take back control of our

BORDERS-TRADE-LAWS-MONEY

-none of which will be possible if these wrecking amendments are allowed to reach the

STATUTE BOOK.

The biggest irony of all is that the Europhile peers who now posture as Champions of Parliamentary sovereignty are the very people who gave away Parliament's rights for more than

40 YEARS

cheerfully subjugating

WESTMINSTER TO BRUSSELS.

So who are they, these few hundred wreckers who believe their views carry more weight that those of

17.4 MILLION OF THEIR FELLOW COUNTRYMEN?

[There is no difficulty in naming these adherents of the undemocratic, collectivist, godless, so-called

EUROPEAN UNION

known as

as

'THE BEAST'

 

TRAITORS]

 

If they were distinguished elder statesmen or giants in the field of science and business, their opinions might command a modicum of respect.  But after years of being stuffed to the rafters witn thirdraters, this bloated legislative chamber-the second in size only to the National People's Congress of China-has become an object of scorn and derision.

Here sit 100 Lib Dems, one in eight of the total number of peers, representing less than

TWO PER CENT

of elected MPs. Others owe their places on the red leather benches to no greater distinction than having a tennis partner of David Cameron or having pumped cash' of uncertain origin, into party coffers.

Here too, alongside hosts of superannuated Whitehall mandarins, you will find legions of seasoned passengers on the EU gravy train. Take Lord Kinnock who has never been elected to public office in his life-or Lord Mandelson, sacked twice from the Cabinet for misconduct.

Then there is the supremely arrogant Lord 'Fat Pang' Patten, kicked out by his constituents in Bath but promptly rewarded with a series of plum jobs rewarded for chums of the powerful-European Commissioner, Governor of Hong Kong, Chairman of the BBC -

[BRUSSELS BRAINWASHING CONTRACTOR

since 1973.]

Chancellor of Oxford University.

Indeed, if Remoaner Peers want to understand why Britain voted to pull out of the EU - run as it is by

UNELECTED-UNACCOUNTABLE, PAMPERED ELITES

FOR THEIR OWN BENEFIT

(and to hell with the wishes of 500 million Europeans)

THE COULD START BY LOOKING IN THE MIRROR .

They might also find a clue in the tawdry supporters they attract.

Take Tony Blair's liar-in-chief Alastair Campbell who, with his genius for

TURNING TRUTH ON ITS HEAD

yesterday hailed Tuesday's vote on the single market as 'a good night for democracy'.

Have any of these EU appeasers stopped to think what would happen if, God forbid. they were to get their way and send the Government crawling back to Brussels with its tail between its legs, begging for readmission to the club?

Britain

would be the laughing stock of the world, utterly at the mercy of Jean-Claude Juncker and his successors.

Even if they achieve their limited end of keeping us in the single market and customs union-EU membership in all but name-they will be leaving us in a weaker position than ever before, still subject to the diktats of Brussels but no longer having any say in making the rules.

At this crucial juncture in our history, the House of Lords should be rallying behind the people and Government of our country, proclaiming Britain's greatness and the magnificent opportunities opening up to the world's sixth largest economy after we break free from the EU's protectionist bloc.

Instead, they strive to weaken and humiliate us, rooting for the other side in the negotiations while seeking to drag us back to a long-distant age when a vastly privileged clique of unelected peers held sway over the lives of millions.

Over the past fortnight they have violated their constitutional role and abused their power beyond endurance. In so doing, they have surely signed

THEIR DEATH WARRANT.

If the Tories are wise, they will enter the next General Election on a solemn pledge to abolish the Lords in its present form and ask a Royal Commission to come up with proposals for an

ELECTED SECOND CHAMBER

DEMOCRACY HAS BEEN INSULTED AND BETRAYED ONCE TOO OFTEN.

*  *  *

 

 

COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

 

 

MAY 10, 2018

 

 

 

Nazi Spy Ring revealed by the Master of Balliol College in 1938. It included the late ex prime minister Edward Heath and Ministers Geoffrey Ribbon and Roy Jenkins.

The above information is after two years now well known to the tens of thousands of viewers of our

TOP BULLETIN

EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED AS ILLEGAL

 

A criminalized organisation

 

Monday 10th October, 2005- London.

 

the most popular of all our Bulletins of each day and each week since it was put on our website in October ,2005 immediately it  had been received. The explosive material which we felt required the greatest coverage possible even though the source of the information had been bullied and exposed to persistent interference from our Security Services.

 

'The signatories, both - of The British treaty of Accession whom received substantial financial rewards for their ‘co-operation’, were Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon. Together with the late Roy Jenkins, they were recruited by the German Abwehr while studying at Balliol College, Oxford in 1938. The Nazi ring of spies was reported to MI5 in 1938 by the then MASTER of Balliol  A.D.Lindsay.

What we were unaware of at the time was that we had already read back in 2000 a book

A.D.LINDSAY

A Biography

by

DRUSILLA SCOTT

[1971

Basil Blackwell

When we received the information from

International Currency Review

we had not connected the information in the publication above with the matter in hand. It is only recently that we have again read the material to find much that puts the exposure in an even firmer basis as the following extract outlines:

'It was with William Temple that Lindsay planned the series of conferences with German statesmen and academics which were held in Balliol [College-Oxford] from 1928 till 1935.  In these small groups the problems of Europe were discussed between the German guests and the English counterparts who were invited to meet them; many of the Germans stayed in the Master's Lodgings, and in the informal setting both sides were able to talk freely, and say what they really felt about war guilt and other emotive subjects.

Among the Germans were professor von Weizsacker, Professor Mendelssohn Bartholdy, a former [German] Minister of Defence, and a former Secretary of State in the German Foreign Office. And among the British guests were Ernest Barker, Stafford Cripps, Gilbert Murray, Arnold Toynbee. William Paton and A.E. Zimmern.

As the years passed , and the menace of Hitler became more apparent such contacts were more difficult, and at the Church, Community and State conference the German delegates were not permitted by their  [German] Government to attend. Lindsay, who was deeply concerned about Germany, used every opportunity of meeting Germans who could throw light on what was happening. Through the Student Christian Movement and in particular through Amy Buller, who knew German students well, he met many groups whop came to England, including one party of which some members were NAZIS.

These meetings brought home to him the intolerable pressures which could make reasonable men accept what HITLER was DOING.'

 

*

 

[We have included the above extract to add to the credibility of the information received from

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

cstory@worldreports.org

 

which two years later NO NEWSPAPER HAS PRINTED or even tinkered around the edges of the traitorous events.

 

It is no surprise that we now learn that a number of Nazi inspired members of Balliol College ,Oxford were able to cover their tracks for over 60 years most certainly with the connivance of German appeasers in our Government and our Security Services.'

There is the case of Edward Heath being given a job in a top security planning department in Aircraft design during the Second World War. It transpired that a brilliant inventor in that department was assassinated by someone sabotaging the controls of the new airplane. But Edward Heath was not suspected? WE wonder WHY?

As we have mentioned recently members of the Establishment including a member of the Royal Family such as Edward VIII was Nazi sympathiser and possibly a spy. No doubt others in Government would have done their worst if Winston Churchill had not become Prime Minister in the nick of time to stop the appeasers from having their Nazis running our Country. In 2008 the same kinds of people wish to ensnare our people into a Nazi inspired dream of the 30,s of a UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.  If the at present idle masses do not come to their senses over the next few months then HITLER and his friends  would  have achieved what two WORLD WARS with over 1,750,000 of our servicemen and women who lost their lives with over 50 million deaths in Europe in the World War II alone and which were fought to prevent a WORLD DICTATORSHIP and the destruction of our Way-of -Life , Common Law of England and all which makes us English and a

FREE and DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE.

Many people must wonder WHY this matter has NOT been exposed by our so-called FREE PRESS. Just after the last war Anthony Sampson in his ANATOMY OF BRITAIN showed the TRUE situation in our country as to who RULES in REALITY at that time which was a few hundred people had the POWER to determine the FUTURE. So it is today on the 31st December ,2007 when the numbers are possibly around 300 who CONTROL the PRESS-INDUSTRY-BANKING SYSTEM-GOVERNMENT and MUCH ELSE . That is WHY the PEOPLE have heard NOTHING. about the NAZI TRAITORS who have undermined our country for over 62 years and are still in place in 2007. The PEOPLE have underestimated what certain people will do to CONTROL THEM and they are now seeing before their eyes the mirage of their once FREEDOM which they will surely LOSE because they left their RIGHTS and LIBERTIES to those they elected who were only concerned with gaining POWER which has been TRUE throughout HISTORY. And instead of protecting their LIBERTIES as they have been constantly warned in the past they decided that others can do it for them because they no longer had any interest in what may happen.

AND NOW THEY WILL PAY THE PRICE!

THE BILDERBERGERS

*

To show the DEVOTION and STEADFASTNESS of A.D.LINDSAY to his FELLOW MEN and for MANKIND in GENERAL and the ARDENT DEFENDER of our UNIQUE CONSTITUTION we reproduce the FOREWORD to the above work.

 

'This is the life (written with rare distinction by his daughter) of Lord Lindsay of Birker, Master of Balliol 1924 -49 and founder of the first of Britain's post - war Universities.

A man in whom thought and action, based on the Christian faith, were exceptionally united, he not only made the theories of democracy vivid to his pupils but played a full part in its practice: working on the human problems of unemployment in the twenties and thirties, standing against the

APPEASEMENT OF HITLER

and fighting with skill and determination for the many causes into which his imaginative sympathy led him.

he believed in education as passionate and as critically as in democracy, and worked all his life to make it relevant to modern needs and to open doors to the excluded - working men, women, and the 'non-bookish majority' whose needs he came to think no less important than those of the academic student.

The understanding of a university's purpose and function which he gathered through his life in Scotland, in Oxford, and from his contacts with universities in India, Germany and America - all this finally brought to bear on the pioneering venture of the new University College at Keele which opened the way for experiment and change in higher education in post-war Britain.

Lindsay's work as a philosopher is also discussed in a chapter by professor Dorothy Emmet.

A.D.LINDSAY'S other book THE ESSENTIALS OF DEMOCRACY by Oxford University press  (1930) contains many lectures which were given in America on the Foundation at Swarthmore College , Pennsylvania in January of the above year. The subject matter touches on the 17th century when the Puritans and Levellers in Cromwell's Army were discussing the idealism behind the then well known phrase

 

' I think the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the richest he'

 

Now it is clear that if this common life is to be the standard of legislation we need in the legislator and the government an understanding of it, and that understanding can only be obtained if that common life finds explicit expression in discussion in which all concerned in that common life -individuals and voluntary associations -take part. Without that the most expert legislator cannot know where the adjustment and regulation of government is necessary ('only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches'), and he cannot know what effect his legislation and enactments will have.

 'A second class law obeyed is better than a first class law disobeyed.'

What is needed, and what most difficult is to combine technical knowledge of the expert with the practical experience and understanding of the common life of the ordinary public. The expert has to be sensitive to public opinion; the ordinary man has somehow to discuss with some understanding of what the experts' proposals amount to. Democracy assumes for its success an educated public: but if all the voluntary associations are centres of education in thinking publicly the task of public education is not quite so hopeless as it would otherwise be.

It follows from this view of the function of the STATE that POLITICS are a secondary matter. Plato said long ago that the STATE would be well ruled only when its rulers had a life BETTER than the POLITICAL ONE. If the purpose of the state's force is to guard and maintain and harmonise a common life, the greater the strength and spontaneity of that common life the more necessary but the easier will be the task of the state -the more necessary because vigorous and spontaneous life produces clashes of interests, new disharmonies, all kinds of possibilities of conflict; the easier because the more real and active the common life, the more real will public opinion be, and the easier the expression of the general will.

We can perhaps now see at least the beginning of an answer to the most serious of the objections raised in the last lecture -the objection that the ordinary voter regards politics with indifference, and is only whipped up to vote by forms of collective excitement such as nationalism or party enthusiasm. These artificial and irrational forms of uniting men are necessary just as so far they are not naturally united in sharing in a wide common culture and participating in a common life where there are no cultural enclaves [as in England in 2007/8] where there is real spiritual communication among groups [providing it does not include the CHRISTIAN RELIGION as in 2007/8] where in fact the smaller groupings unite and do not divide [ In 2007/8 the now abandoned Leftist dogma of  Multiculturalism has already done irreparable damage to community relations] Where that is not the case, in a community with cultural or religious barriers [As again in 2007/8] only some cause which enlists strong irrational excitement -[As Fundamentalist Islam in 2007/8]   can force men together to the necessary degree to get the work of government done.

In that sense it is true that nationalism is as it were the measles of nationality. nations are made nations usually by strong external forces...

For nationalism, one of the most powerful religions in the world today [January,1930 as in 2007/8]...

[A selection of our bulletins follows]

 

Almost everything that is precious in our civilisation has come from small states.

*

A Fabian Europhile of 1947 supported Independent Nation States.

*

Empires have gone and most people in the world live in Nation States.

*

[The last few paragraphs of the book]

...We cannot I think, ever make our political government, considered in itself, really representative. The scale on which it has to operate is too vast -its units, the constituencies, are , if taken  in themselves, too big and far too little informed by any public spirit to be really democratic. But if a vigorous non -political democratic life exists, the political machinery may harmonise and co-ordinate all that partial focussing of public opinion which non-political associations perform. There can be ,and there is increasingly coming to be a vast deal of public discussion and political education focussed by universities, by churches, and by all kinds of cultural associations.

This may all seem a far cry from what happens today. Politics is still largely a scene of conflicts for power and of irrational enthusiasms. No democratic political machinery, however well devised, can in itself make it different. Against the perversion and abuse of political power by powerful interests the individual is singularly helpless. Improvised and ad hoc reform associations are not much more effective.  Only associations which exist for their own purposes and are yet concerned for the public welfare as a whole (such as churches and universities to create a DISINTERESTED and REAL PUBLIC OPINION.

 

[As the EDP has found in its almost 13 years on the political scene -endeavouring to obtain the reform of our representative system by PR and a fixed term time limit on MPs to give them more freedom to put their COUNTRY FIRST instead of having their eyes on their next election and the gold-plated pension.]

Complacent optimism about democracy has done much harm in the past, but the disillusioned scepticism which has taken its place is worse [As in 2007/8] There are all kinds of grounds for  alarm, but there are as many grounds for rational hope [1930]. We have suffered in the past from making democracy into a dogma, in the sense of thinking of it as something magical, except from the ordinary laws which govern human nature. the con version of principles into magical dogmas has the effect in politics as it has in religion. the magic that cannot be believed is accepted till it is found out, [In 2007/8] and then the true principle on which it is based is abandoned along with it.

DEMOCRACY IMPLIES FAITH-BUT A REASONED FAITH.

In the INTRODUCTION of A. D. Lindsay -A Biography following view was stated by Dr Christopher Hill a tutor at Balliol College, Oxford and a member of the Communist party who advised A. D. Lindsay who was a man to look into different political systems with an open mind as he felt it was important to give the other view  in order to arrive at a fair conclusion.

'I have never been able to distinguish completely in my own mind between

A. D. LINDSAY and OLIVER CROMWELL

'they were great men of the Calvinist type. Each of them had a sense of being the elect; for each the consequence was less a smug self-satisfaction than a strong sense of

DUTY TO OTHERS

Each found it difficult to define in a series of slogans exactly what he wanted to bring about, and in consequence was accused of opportunism and inconsistency.

Each won the loyalty of those close to him, and the execution of those who failed to sympathise. Each discovered, rather late in life, a great talent for political manoeuvre, and a

TREMENDOUS MORAL POWER

Each has a vivid sense of the politically  possible, and each was capable of persuading himself that the possible was desirable. Each combined

REAL TRUST

in God with great care for the dryness of his powder, to such an extent that each was accused  of hypocrisy....

Each was generously and perceptively tolerant of those with the root of the matter in them; each could be

HARSH

 and unsympathetic to those outside the pale.

CROMWELL never believed in DEMOCRACY

as LINDSAY did, but he wanted to believe in parliamentary government; each of them, once he realised his power as a politician, sometimes found it irresistible to give

"what's for their good, not what pleases them"

Each was a great man whose achievement, at first sight, seems incommensurable with the effort put into it. yet it was not long after Oliver's death that worldly -wise men like Samuel Pepys looked back to his time as one when other considerations

THAN SELF-INTEREST RULED...'

[Oxford Magazine, Feb. 23rd, 1961.]

On 31st December, 2007 we have a prime minister who with his family history of Presbyteries and the government of the most democratic of religious societies - the Society of Friends-a pure example of representative democracy. He is aware of the 'sense of the meeting' he knows of the history of the FREE CHURCH of SCOTLAND he knows of the 'Claim of Right'. Gordon Brown more than anyone else knows why a PEOPLE and NATION must be FREE and that an UNDEMOCRATIC MAMMOTH is not for any in our once RULE BRITANNIA.  As we have said before he has an opportunity which comes to a politician only once in a lifetime if he would only stand by his INHERITANCE and ignore the present  poisoness ACCOLADES offered , and use his considerable influence by CHANGING EUROPE to a community of independent Nation States and  by strengthening and revitalising the unique Parliamentary democracy of England to face the great issues which now appear in the 21st century. He can be a

MAN of DESTINY

or remembered as a man who sold his country and that of England and our western neighbour which were placed in his hands and sworn to 

PROTECT .

A REFERENDUM held within the next few months will confirm our good opinion of the MAN but a denial will further emphasis that He can no longer be TRUSTED as a politician or a MAN.

 

*

Added December, 2007

*

This intelligence has emerged since the recent death of Sir Edward Heath [Another Traitor amongst many who have been honoured by the Queen with a title]

EXPOSURES TRIGGERED BY THE DEATH OF

SIR EDWARD HEATH

 

These revelations have become possible following the death of Sir Edward Heath, who was a German agent and asset for six decades - the longest known foreign intelligence penetration in modern history.

 

It is significant that the extensive Obituary of Heath published in the Guardian on 18th July 2005, closed with the cryptic sentence:

 

‘He [Heath] remained determined that he would be vindicated, until close to the end.

 

This referred to the fact that when Heath visited Salzburg in 2003, ostensibly to attend the Music Festival there, the real reason for his visit was that he had been summoned to Dachau, where DVD officers warned him that

British intelligence were intending to confront him with his treachery.

 

It is reported that, on hearing this, Heath literally ‘blew a fuse’: he suffered a pulmonary embolism.

 

A similar fate attended the demise of the late Roy (Lord) Jenkins who suffered a severe heart attack when confronted by intelligence officials with the fact that he was about to be exposed for his long-term treachery against the United Kingdom.

 

Roy Jenkins [Later Lord Jenkins] was one of the most lethal of all long-term German agents operating at the highest levels of the British Government.

 

-the present allegedly deeply compromised Tony Blair is the late Lord Jenkins’ protégé.

 

Heath, Rippon and Jenkins were far from being the only long-term. High-level foreign penetrations by the DVD-the successor ‘Black’ (continuing Nazi) intelligence organisation to the Abwehr.

 *

Is it not strange that the Security Services have been very active in revealing Communist traitors over the last 62 years and there is the case of HER MAJESTY the QUEEN finding a Communist traitor Blunt who was in her service at the time.

What is so strange is that the Nazi spies seemed to have been given immunity over the same period as no case of a Nazi spy has been revealed until

 

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

after much harassment by the Security Services decide to print THE TRUTH

 

 

The above information received from:

International Currency Review

, VOL. 30 NO 4 [extracts from 153 pages -shown above], available by subscription from www.worldreports.org. was mailed to paying subscribers worldwide on

 

10th October 2005

 

Banks, Corporations and other entities that use subscription agencies may subscribe to World Reports Ltd serials (complete) through their usual channels, or else direct from our website, or from the London or New York addresses shown in the lower red panel on the

 

www.worldreports.org Home Page. The website has a secure and reliable subscription ordering system.

 

ABOUT INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

 

International Currency Review is the only INDEPENDENT global journal specialising in international currency, financial and economic issues with a geopolitical and intelligence dimension.

 

Published since 1969, it specialises today in exposing corruption in governance structures, since the corruption of governance and of the capitalist system is swamping all other considerations.

 

The Journal is one of a series of intelligence sources published by World Reports, details of which will be found on our website:

 

www.worldreports.org

 

International Currency Review has recently exposed the basis of the ‘Upper Echelon’ global financial structure, which sustains the ‘Lower Echelon’ structure with which we are all familiar.

 

The ‘Upper Echelon’ is a ‘closed’ intergovernmental and intelligence financial environment characterised by high -yield investment programmes, scamming operations and colossal stored fiat wealth running into trillions of dollars

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

* * *

OCTOBER 10-2005

*

FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS

*

A TRAITOR-FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?

*

The term DVD stands for Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst or German Defence Agency or Secret Service.

*

European Union exposed as illegal -A criminalised organisation

 

*

Revealed after his death that Edward Heath: An agent of Nazi International and traitor to his country since 1938.

*

A plague of treachery-corruption and skulduggery has taken over once proud democracies.

*

GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 by HEINRICH HIMMLER

*

Democracy is a dialectual farce because intelligence agencies call the shots -not so-called democracies.

*

What are the dark actors playing games, which Dr David Kelly referred?

*

Britain can leave the EU unilaterally and cease payment says Queen's Counsel.

*

EU whistleblowers expose billions of EU fraud but nothing is done.

 

*

Nazi traitor Edward heath left 5 million to his own charity-his home opposite Salisbury Cathedral.

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

DECEMBER-2007

 

*

H.F.1443

 

 H.F.1547

*  *  *

AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF

THE BEAST!

IN

BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE TRAITOROUS EDWARD HEATH WILL BE RETURNED IN MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

*

ENGLAND'S

GREAT ESCAPE

 FROM

HITLER'S  FOURTH REICH

See also: eutruth.org.uk-Why we are leaving!-if you need a reminder?

*

IN MARCH 2018 WE HEAR THAT   ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IS GOING TO SELL OUT OUR FISHING RIGHTS AND  ISLAND FISHING FIELDS.

 THERE MUST BE NO SURRENDER OF ENGLISH

AND OTHER  ISLAND NATIONS SOVEREIGNTY OF THEIR HISTORIC WATERS.

This has been brought about because as we  suspected  to expect a

 REMAIN Prime Minister and her fellow closet traitors

 to put her country FIRST! and give the PEOPLE their

 BREXIT which means BREXIT

now looks like an impossible dream.

ENGLAND IS NOT ENGLAND WITHOUT FULL CONTROL OF HER HISTORIC WATERS.

BETRAYAL!

Now foreign firms to keep fishing in UK waters after

BREXIT

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

In 1962,

Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality  HITLER'S plan for Europe under GERMAN Control.

 


    Winston Churchill, Myth and Reality: What He Actually Did and Said - Google Books Result
     

    Britain's attitude, Churchill explained, resembles that which we adopt about the
    European Army. We help, we dedicate, we play a part, but we are not merged
    with and do not forfeit our
    insular or commonwealth character. Our first object is
    the unity and consolidation of the British Commonwealth. Our second, “the
    fraternal ...

SCOTLAND AND WALES HAVE THEIR PARLIAMENT

 - HOW LONG MUST

 ENGLAND

WAIT FOR HER'S?

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH.

*

OF THE

 HITLERITE EUROPEAN UNION

THE TRAITOROUS PEERS

ARE THE

'USEFULL IDIOTS'

*

We're sure that Mrs May is aware of the biblical psalm

'Righteousness exalteth a nation' [14:34]

17.4 million people voted in June 2016 to regain their once FREE -INDEPENDENT NATION STATE and since that time many others are joining the BREXIT BANNER by the DAY.

 

'LET RIGHT BE DONE!'

*

On the facts before us as to the closet EU retainers advising the PM at the highest level in Government it can only be construed as an example  of duplicity - hardly likely to give confidence to Brexit voters at this time?

We can see little difference between the actions of  the arch traitor Edward Heath  with his top civil servants in the 1970's and the actions of Theresa May  with hers in 2018. WE ask where is the English attribute of 'Fair- play' in this matter?

Brexiteers,for sure, dont want any 'dreamed up 'CRETINOUS' plan from Europhiles.

*

'Nothing is ever settled until it is settled right'.

Rudyard Kipling.

*

WE NOW MUST DEPEND ON THE

 BREXIT FOUR-

FOX-DAVIS-JOHNSON-GOVE

'Statesman, yet friend to truth! of soul sincere / in action faithful, and in honour clear,/ Who broke no promise, served no private end,/ Who gained no title, and lost no friend. '[Ib.V.67] - Pope

 

MAY 2,2018

 

*  *  *

 

[A MATTER OF FACT!]

 

 

THE EUROPEAN COLLECTIVE

By

 

CHRISTOPHER STORY FRSA

TRUTH-SEEKER AND PATRIOT

2002

CONCLUSION: THE E.U. AS THE ENEMY OF ITS MEMBER STATES

'THE BEAST'

COLLABORATION MASKS MUTUAL STRATEGIC DECEPTION

In May 1940, the Reich Association for Economic Planning issued a document containing the statement mentioned on page 209: 'A continental European economy under German leadership must... comprise all the peoples of the Continent from Gibraltar to the Urals and from the North Cape to the island of Cyprus...[but] on foreign-political grounds it appears to be necessary to designate this not as a German extended-area economy, but fundamentally always to speak of a European Economic Community' ['Europaisches Wirtschaftsgemeinshaft']

Chapter 10, Volume Two of Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' was entitled' FEDERALISM AS A MASK'. Careful analysis of the typically 'roundabout' language still employed by covert Pan-Germans, the heirs of Nazi International, today are revealed that this 'line' is the essence of Germany's hegemony ideology. In other words there has never been any discontinuity of Pan-German strategy up to, through and since the Nazi were in power in Berlin.

Note the explicit geographical description of the scope and boundaries of the intended 'German extended-area economy': 'Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals'. Within this 'Thousand-Year-Reich', the sovereignty of the captive nations will have been destroyed, in line with Lenin's pronouncement that' we set ourselves the ultimate aim of destroying the state'- with one critical exception: Germany itself is to survive as Greater Germany, but under a different name. Hence, there was and is to be one rule (state survival) for the Germans, and another (state destruction) for all other captive European peoples.  The European Union has developed exactly in accordance with the blueprint elaborated by the Nazis in the 1940s.

To ensure the realisation of their deception strategy, it is clear that the continuing Pan-German planners have in practice, so to speak 'bolted the framework' of their strategy onto the revolutionary structures of the Leninist Communists. While the heirs of the Nazis have cunningly elaborated and perfected over the years their own version of diplomatic and propaganda double-talk comparable to a form of Leninist Aesopianism, as elaborated by Stresemann and Adenauer, they have made spectacular progress with the fulfilment of the Nazis International's plans hatched at the German Geopolitical Centre, that they no longer bother to disguise them. But the Pan Germans, reckless and ruthless as always, are running huge risks-because they are dealing in bad faith with both the continuing Soviet Leninists and with the confused West European Socialist Governments.

The fact that the continuing Pan-German strategists are secretly using 'federalism as a mask', as Hitler proclaimed in 'Mein Kampf', and are agitating day and night for regional federalism and for the full collectivisation of residual sovereignty throughout the European Union, while seeking to disguise that this prescription will never apply to Greater Germany itself, alone justifies this book's finding that the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

is indeed

THE ENEMY OF ITS MEMBER STATES.

That the EU is likewise responding to the parallel pressures from the continuing Leninists for 'universal European integration', means the EU membership is truly a 'kiss of death' for those countries that have been led by their misguided elites into this terminal trap-from where their demoralised citizens mare condemned to watching their countries being tortured, raped and beaten to death under the relentless pressures of the frenzied and accelerating 'coup d'etat by installments'.

Driven by the insane logic of Lenin's idolatrous World Revolution-which preaches 'change' to WHAT?', and which presupposes total collectivisation for the whole of humanity-the covert Communists, who are currently following Lenin's deception instruction that, for the time being, 'under no circumstances {is it our task} to promote Communist views', insist that the only acceptable' prescription for Europe (by which they mean Eurasia) must be 'universal European integration'. Lenin taught the revolutionaries to be meticulous with the use of words (a trick acquired also by Pan-Germans). Thus the key-word here is 'universal- which precludes any question of boundary imitations.  For the Leninists claim that, because they are 'Europeans' and control the political space eastwards to the pacific Ocean, 'universal European integration' means 'Europe from the Atlantic to Vladivostok' , which they also refer to as 'Great Europe', and which must be 'guaranteed' by the Comintern's long-planned system of 'collective security', centred on Moscow. In other words, there has never been  any true discontinuity of Soviet strategy since the 1920s, and especially since the 'changes' of 1989-91-which represented a Leninist, rather than a genuine, 'Break with the Past'.

For the time being, it suits the interests of the 'General Staff' of Lenin's World Revolution, for the European Union Collective-or the 'new European Soviet' ,as Gobachev has accurately described it-to devote its seething revolutionary energies to the maximisation of federalism and collectivisation within its inexplicably eastwards-expanding 'boundaries'. But despite bilateral treaties, the trilateral nexus with France, a complex bilateral and multilateral treaty network drafted by the Leninist apparat ['rats'] to ensure 100% European compliance with the Soviets' 'Europe from Atlantic to Vladivostok' model, the continuing Leninist strategists know that the Germans are using European federalism 'as a mask' for the final realisation of their own previously thwarted idolatrous geopolitical ambitions.

While each side is engaged in strategic deception directed in part against each other, and in both cases against naive socialist Europeans, both expect their model alone shall prevail.  The chess-playing Soviets took the precaution to ensure, by means of a threatening military posture [See page 237] which appears to have been largely overlooked, that only their prescription can ever be applied.  They also left a time bomb lying in the Czech Republic.  Additionally, to procure the intended 'Soviet' outcome, the Revolution has taken the necessary precautions, co-ordinated by Vladimir Putin and the Soviet Military Intelligence while Putin was serving in East Germany [Previous home of Frau Merkel], to ensure that Germany's political and bureaucratic structures have been extensively penetrated and taken over by covert and 'former' Communists from the east.  The likelihood is that the Pan-Germans, having compromised as in the past with Communists, and driven by their 'leaning towards Russia', will misinterpret the Leninists' intentions as they approach the realisation of their long-frustrated ambition to subsume Germany in its 'transitional format', with

GREATER GERMANY

by another name. They will overplay their hand.

 Europe cannot look to France for any hope of rescue or salvation, since Paris is enmeshed in its insidious trilateral nexus with Germany and Russia - certain that its treaty relationship with Germany can only be to its advantage, and bound to be covert Leninist revolutionaries by the terms of its bilateral treaty of 7th February 1992, under the terms of which France has become an agent for Lenin's World Revolution.  The smaller European powers are hobbled by the ideologies who control policy; and even in Portugal and Ireland, where the adverse economic consequences of their rash participation in the Economic and Monetary Collective's straightjacket are becoming daily more apparent, no serious official thought is being given to the logical step which will need to be taken if severe economic consequences are to be avoided. Ironically, though, the eccentric President of the European Commission, Signor Prodi, is on record as having mused that Italy might have to leave the collective regime, even though this is not permitted under the Collective Treaty.

Only the United Kingdom, which since the beginning of the 1970s has been systematically betrayed by its successive governments, led by the 'Conservatives', has, among the EU 'Member States' of world substance, contrived, though incompetence and fumbling, to hold back a little from the revolutionary onslaught. The slim chances of Britain escaping national annihilation were diminishing at an ever accelerating pace as this book was being finalised.  For instance, on 6th February n2002, the European 'Parliament' approved the European Arrest Warrant [See page xxxiii] and blocked the habeas corpus safeguard established by the English Common Law since the 13th century, as a means of preventing over-zealous or corrupt magistrates from incarcerating EU citizens from another EU country sine die in their own jails, or in those of a third EU country.  This appalling retrograde decision means that Britons, with effect from 2004, will be at risk of being arbitrarily arrested for crimes which are not recognised in English Law, such as racism or xenophobia. The definition of 'terrorism' was extended to cover 'passive' support for prescribed groups ( the list of which can be extended, of course, to include critics of the revolutionary EU collectivist dictatorship), and the legislation will enable a judge or a prosecuting magistrate anywhere in the EU Collective to order the extradition of a British citizen on the basis of suspicion alone without any need for a dossier of evidence to be presented.

 

Thus the shape of 'The Beast' is emerging before our eyes, from behind the hideous edifice of Europe's Tower of Babal. Diabolically, it has the imprimatur of the captive nation states whose blind political elites have fallen into this Nazi-Soviet trap. For the EU is indeed

THE ENEMY of its MEMBER STATES

God will surly judge the 'useful idiots' and idolatrous ideologues responsible for leading their peoples into this pit.

 

 
 

THE+EUROPEAN+UNION+COLLECTIVE-ENEMY+OF+ITS+MEMBER+STATES+BY+

CHRISTOPHER+STORY+

PATRIOT+AND+TRUTH+SEEKER

SINCE 2005 THE ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC  PARTY HAS SHOWN MANY BULLETINS OF THE BRILLIANT AND DETAILED WORK OF CHRISTOPHER WHICH ENABLED US TO SUBSTANTIATE THE EVIL DOCTRINE OF THE SUPPOSED EEC WHICH IN REALITY WAS TO BECOME THE BEAST TO DEVOUR THE ONCE FREE NATIONS OF EUROPE INTO A CAPTIVITY WHICH ENGLAND HAS BEEN INCARCERATED OVER THE PAST 47 YEARS.

OUR DELIVERANCE FROM THIS CESSPIT OF CAPTIVITY IS  TO TAKE PLACE ON MARCH 2019 THOUGH IT WILL BE YEARS BEFORE ENGLAND WILL BECOME A TRULY INDEPENDENT NATION STATE AS WAS THE CASE IN THE YEARS BEFORE 1972 WHEN TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS CALLING THEMSELVES CONSERVATIVES DECIDED NOT TO CONSERVE OUR WORLD RENOWNED FREEDOM AND INDEPENDENCE BUT BECOME A CAPTIVE STATE WITHIN HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN DOMINATION OF EUROPE.  AND AS A LESSON FROM HISTORY  THE  BREAK-UP OF THE GODLESS MONSTROSITY CALLING ITSELF A EUROPEAN UNION WILL BE ONLY A MATTER OF TIME!]

As one of our greatest prime ministers stated on the 9th November.1805 after the VICTORY at TRAFALGAR on 21st October, 1805.-

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

WE CAN DO IT!

 
About 8,970 results
 
    [PDF] 

    The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

    exopolitics.blogs.com/files/eu-collective.pdf
    collective and the enemy of its Member States, have had any hand in the ... Truth,
    and our mutual friend Mrs Betty Sakuma, of Long Island, truly a jewel of light; my
    ... Christopher Edward Harle Story was born in the United Kingdom in 1938 and ...

     

    European Union Collective: Amazon.co.uk: Christopher Story ...

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/European-Union-Collective-Christopher-Story/.../ 1899798013
    European Union Collective Paperback – 1 Sep 1997. by Christopher Story (
    Author) .... Christopher Story knits a powerful web of intrigue and deception. ...
    presented in this book are mind blowing if there is an element of truth in what he
    says. ... of the Soviet Union meant that the image of the Soviets as enemy was
    dissolved.

     

    Page 763 - The Truthseeker

    www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/index.php?p=qoqsphbpilmb&paged...
    Every Jew in the 111th Congress supports the gangster state of Israel, whose ......
    Christopher Story: The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member ...

     

    The G-20 Agreed to Strangle Us With Debt - The Truthseeker

    https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=13103
    9 Jul 2010 ... Christopher Story: The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States:
    A Study in Russian and German Strategy to Complete Lenin's ...

     

    Paul Bridger - ~*~"QUICK MARCH 'LOCKSTEP' EU ... - Facebook

    https://www.facebook.com/truthseekerapp/posts/835082369955768
    To see more from TruthSeeker on Facebook, log in or create an account. .... The
    European Union Collective Enemy Of Its Member States ... In Russian And
    German Strategy To complete Lenin's World Author, Christopher Story (1 Sep
    1997).

     

    TruthSeeker - Facebook

    https://www.facebook.com/truthseekerapp/posts/834519493345389
    The European Union Collective Enemy Of Its Member States A Study In Russian
    And German Strategy To complete Lenin's World Author, Christopher Story (1 ...

     

    Dismantle European Union - Facebook

    https://www.facebook.com/DismantleEuropeanUnion/.../1056716077752740 /?...
    Ole Dammegård Truth Seeker Conspiracies Open Mind Awareness False Flag
    ops ..... THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE ENEMY OF ITS MEMBER
    STATES - A ... STRATEGY - To complete Lenin's World Revolution - By
    Chrispopher Story. ... Pope & M.I.5 Suspected of Brexit Vote Fraud -
    christophereverard.co.uk.

     

    European Union « Christopher STORY his work & more

    https://christopherstory.org/tag/european-union/
    Posts about European Union written by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) ... Jr.;
    The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld ...
    case, the British and other EU 'Member States” satrap Governments are
    knowingly ... Merkel stated also that a European Union without its most powerful
    economy, ...

     

    HARRY J: Is Nick Griffin A Freemason (Why The New World Order ...

    revolutionharry.blogspot.com/.../is-nick-griffin-freemason-why-new-world. html
    30 Jun 2010 ... In an essay on the Truth Seeker website the author refers to his friend Dave
    Starbuck who knew Nick ...... It's a book written by Christopher Story in 2002 titled,
    "The European Union Collective, Enemy of its Member States".

     

    BANKS ROB YOU WITH COMPUTER VIRUS SOON - Disclose.tv

    www.disclose.tv/.../banks-rob-you-with-computer-virus-soon-t24413.html
    Truthseeker: Conspirator ... WELL ITS COMING the new world bank to help save
    you from .... In upcoming years, cities, states & nations will have one
    overwhelming .... an ultra-disciplined culture of alleged "economic truth" (that
    applies only ... Christopher Story: The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its ...

     
Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe. Learn more
Searches related to THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE-ENEMY OF ITS MEMBER STATES BY CHRISTOPHER STORY -PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

the new underworld order

history of european union pdf

christopher story website

 

 [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

*  *  *

AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF THE

BEAST

 OF

BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE TRAITOROUS EDWARD HEATH WILL BE RETURNED IN MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

*  *  *

History is the best cultivator of true Patriotism

 

 

Over 20 centuries of the Christian Era  is behind us and further back other eras. We draw on the accumulated experience of those centuries.

 

'This I think is true of History. It enables us to regard modern problems with eyes that look backward as well as forward. This is how many would-be reformers and so-called politicians go hopelessly wrong. They don't know History. [You all know who we have in mind in 2006]

 

They launch out into schemes, build up fine theories, institute far-reaching measures, which, had they but studied the annals of other ages, they would know to be futile or dangerous, because they ran counter to human nature of economic history, or a nation's inherited character.

'History is the best cultivator of true patriotism for if we read the long struggles by which their rights when we realize that the liberties we now enjoy [only just in 2006] and perhaps prize too lightly, [As is an English characteristic  which is being aroused  December 2006], cost the blood of heroes and martyrs; when we remember the brave deeds done on British soil, the great hearts that have beat in our country's cause, the noble men and women who have lived and walked to make the British man glorious -we feel pride of race that has no meanness, and  if we have a spark of native fire, we shall make a secret resolution, not to let that name be dragged into the dirt of infamy.

And History will temper this patriotism with a restraining influence, bidding us reverence the traditions of other nations, teaching us that patriotism should not be narrowing and insular. but shall go hand in hand with the world-wide fellowship of common charity, not judging every nation by our own standard, nor thinking that because a thing is British it is right, because it is foreign it is wrong but rather giving us the desire to learn and profit from all that is best among other people in other lands, and to stamp out all that compares unfavorably in our own national character.'

[Philip Gibbs-1903]

In every corner of our island there are places with names which bring to mind the history of our forefathers and their fight for their freedom and liberty and those who have no time for History and Blunder on with their mistaken and devastating actions in the early years of the 21st century will ultimately fail  as they always will who fail to take the people with them in total disregard to their historical inheritance.

At the time these words were written the British Empire was a reality today in December 2006 the Empire is long past and it is England which now finds itself threatened with extinction. If only the Media and Press would put aside their blindness to the state of a once proud and just nation State and mention the forbidden name of England which as we all know has been written off the map of the United States of Europe -thankfully but that is no reason that a nation state with  1,500 years in the making should be ignored by those who claim to represent the 87 per cent of the population of our shared island and yet the name England is avoided when ever possible -sometimes it is referred to as 'Elsewhere'

Our sister nation states of Wales and Scotland have their nationhood and it about time that England claimed its right with its own

English Parliament

AT

WESTMINSTER.

*

ADDED MARCH 3,2018

 WE have  described the English People as an insular people as in respect of their instinctive protection of their unique constitutional inheritance and separation from the EU which we find lacking in REMAINERS.

 

*          *          *

DECEMBER/06

*

H.F.1494

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

LITTLEJOHN

We need a fearless leader to deliver

BREXIT

- Nigel Farage:

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN believes the former Ukip leader should be an integral part of the process after campaigning for so long

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly

Enoch Powell said famously that all political careers end in failure. Nigel Farage should have proved him wrong.

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly.

Up to a point.

The magnificent Leave victory in 2016 was a vindication of Farage’s virtually single-handed campaign to get Britain out of the EU.

Yes, others can also take credit. But Farage was the figurehead, often a lone voice in the wilderness. 

No one had to endure the vilification and violence directed at Farage as he took his message around the country year after year, well before Call Me Dave finally buckled and gave the people a long-overdue referendum.

Fifteen years ago, when I was presenting a nightly show on Sky News, I was about the only broadcaster who would give him a regular platform. The mainstream media treated him as a pariah — at best a circus act, at worst a neo-Nazi. 

This was around the time that New Labour was almost unanimously agreed to have established a 1,000-year reich and opposition to our glorious future as a European statelet was considered futile.

Aside from a few principled players in the Conservative Party — former leader and one-time Maastricht rebel Iain Duncan Smith prominent among them — the political establishment wholeheartedly embraced the EU project. 

But Farage kept banging away, making mischief in Brussels, where he’d managed to get himself elected as an MEP and used his position to ridicule the pompous panjandrums running the show.

Who can forget his wonderful denunciation of the ridiculous Herman Van Rompuy, self-styled former European ‘president’?

‘You have the charisma of a damp rag, and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk . . . Who are you? I’d never heard of you. Nobody in Europe had ever heard of you.

‘I would like to ask you, President, who voted for you . . . oh, I know democracy’s not popular with you lot, and what mechanism do the people of Europe have to remove you?

‘Is this European democracy? You appear to have a loathing for the very concept of the existence of nation states — perhaps that’s because you come from Belgium, which of course is pretty much a non-country . . .

‘Sir, you have no legitimacy in this job at all, and I can say with confidence that I speak on behalf of the majority of British people in saying: We don’t know you, we don’t want you, and the sooner you’re put out to grass, the better.’

The Westminster bubble was horrified. How dare this upstart show such a lack of respect to our European masters? But out in the suburbs and the shires, and on the rundown council estates in the North of England, millions of decent British citizens gave a silent cheer.

Call Me Dave dismissed Farage’s Ukip as a collection of ‘fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists’. It was a cruel caricature, but partly accurate. Ukip’s annual conference certainly resembles a roomful of Hyacinth Buckets and men who model themselves on the Major in Fawlty Towers.

But Ukip was on a roll — and by now Farage was a ubiquitous presence in radio and TV studios, even if he was often only there as an Aunt Sally, to be shouted at by self-righteous presenters and panellists alike.

Yet Farage stood up to the verbal slings and arrows, and to the nasty physical abuse he frequently had to endure. Cigarette in one hand, pint of best in the other, he kept on plugging away.

In the 2015 General Election, Ukip polled almost four million votes, a large chunk of them in former Labour strongholds in the North, which felt ignored and abandoned and had suffered the greatest impact from mass immigration.

Farage’s ‘fruitcakes’ didn’t make a parliamentary breakthrough but they delivered the Tories their first Commons majority since 1992, simply by denying Labour seats they had taken for granted.

Now, Cameron feared, they were coming for the Tories, so he panicked and promised a referendum on EU membership. 

Say what you like about Call Me Dave, but this was his greatest gift to the people of Britain, an opportunity we seized, asserting our sovereignty and overturning the decades-old project of submerging our country into an anti-democratic United States of Europe.

 

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be

Cameron’s gamble backfired. He resigned immediately and is now reduced to scraping a living on the international lecture circuit, essentially a political end-of-the-pier show.

Next week, he’s playing a small town theatre in Florida, but has sold fewer seats than its current production, Million Dollar Quartet, a jukebox musical featuring hits by Johnny Cash, Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins and Jerry Lee Lewis.

In the States, where they value national independence, Farage is a folk hero, a bigger draw than our former Prime Minister.

And yet.

OK, so the referendum wouldn’t have been won without Boris, Gove and the brave career politicians who dared to defy the Establishment stitch-up. But without Farage, there would have been no referendum, nor would there have been any Brexit.

What kind of Brexit, if any, remains to be seen. Which, presumably, is why Farage is now muttering about making a comeback as part of a Ukip Mark II.

The corpse of the old Ukip is still twitching, but without Farage it’s nothing. The party’s on its third post-Farage leader, no one you’ve ever heard of, and he’s on the way out over a few incendiary tweets sent by some dopey bird half his age he’s got himself hooked up with. I can’t be bothered to go into details, because it’s a waste of time.

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be.

One of the reasons Ukip imploded was because those four million voters returned to the two main parties, both of which made manifesto promises to implement Brexit in full, yet now seem hell-bent on either reneging or watering it down so far it becomes meaningless.

So I understand and share Farage’s concern. As I’ve said all along, the fix has been in since the result of the referendum was announced. The political class have stolen our biggest vote in history for anything and made it all about them — not the people they are paid to serve.

Frankly, I don’t trust any of them to deliver the Brexit we voted for. If the vast majority of MPs had their way, they’d stop the whole process in its tracks today. When Theresa May succeeded Call Me Dave, she should have established a grand cross-party coalition to negotiate our departure, including heroic Labour figures such as Gisela Stuart and Kate Hoey.

But the central player should have been Farage, a man who knows his way around Brussels and scares the EU to death.

He’d never have put up with the contemptuous treatment being meted out to Britain by Michel Barnier and his ‘damp-rag, low-grade bank clerk’ bureaucrats.

Instead, we’re stuck with Mother Theresa, who spent the referendum hiding behind the sofa and still won’t say whether she’d vote Leave if it was held today.

Her new de facto deputy, David Lidington, is a full-on federast, already speculating we could rejoin the EU at some stage. Rejoin? We haven’t even left yet — and never will, other than in name only, if the political establishment prevails.

Even David Davis seems to have gone native and Boris has been banished to the outer darkness, certainly when it comes to Brexit. In what kind of Fred Karno government is the Foreign Secretary excluded from the biggest foreign policy issue facing the country in modern history?

Never mind Boris, though. Mrs May should be making plans for Nigel, bringing him into the fold, allowing him to be an integral part of the very Brexit process for which he has campaigned so long, so hard and so selflessly.

He doesn’t need a knighthood, or a sinecure in the Lords — each of which would have been a traditional reward for his service to this country. Given the fuss over Mrs Thatcher’s memorial, I suppose a statue in Parliament Square is out of the question, too.

But what is beyond doubt is that, after Thatcher, Farage is the most influential, most significant British political figure since Churchill — much more so than the Westminster pygmies and time-servers who treat him with unwarranted disdain.

Ukip, the party he led, may be sleeping with the fishes, but if there is any justice, Farage’s career deserves to end in triumph.

Let’s hope Enoch was wrong.

 


Read more:   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5300489/We-need-fearless-leader-deliver-Brexit-Nigel-Farage.html#ixzz55RBjzeYS

 

H.F.1460

STEPHEN GLOVER: Despite the deviousness of our rulers

WE'LL LEAVE THE

EU

 A YEAR FROM TODAY

[ON]

MARCH 29,2O19

thanks to the good sense of the people.

 

One year from today, the United Kingdom will leave the European Union. It is now possible to say this with something approaching certainty.

I confess to being somewhat surprised that this momentous upheaval seems very likely to take place despite the awesome efforts of the Establishment.

Immediately after the British people voted to leave in the June 2016 referendum, I was afraid the political class would find a way to frustrate the democratic will of the majority.

But despite countless scare stories propagated by anti-Brexit politicians and the BBC, which followed bloodcurdling predictions pumped out by Project Fear before the vote, this country is on track to exit the EU. In the circumstances, this is little short of a miracle.

 

I confess to being somewhat surprised that this momentous upheaval seems very likely to take place despite the awesome efforts of the Establishment and Westminster doomsayers

It is, above all, a testament to the resilience and sense of the British people — or at any rate the majority who voted for Brexit and have stuck to their guns despite repeated attempts to unnerve them.

Consider how many apocalyptic prophesies have been aimed at them by doomsayers in Westminster and Whitehall, and will doubtless continue to be aired until we leave — and probably beyond.

Before the referendum, Project Fear, orchestrated by the then Chancellor, George Osborne, informed us that a vote to leave would bring about ‘an immediate and profound economic shock’.

Arrogance

An instant recession was predicted if people had the temerity to vote Brexit. Interest rates would rise sharply and unemployment would soar. There would be an emergency Budget.

Of course, none of these things came to pass. The economy continues to grow at a reasonably smart pace, and every quarter it exceeds most official forecasts.

What is so amazing — and, to me, moving — is that 17.5 million people ignored these dire predictions from a ruling class expert in the dark arts of hoodwinking, which had all the resources of the State at its disposal.

At a cost of £9 million, the Government even sent a leaflet to every home, warning voters of the certain shocks to the economy if people were foolish enough to vote Leave.

It turns out the Man in Whitehall does not only not know best, which most of us had gathered long ago. He is also mendacious, manipulative and often mistaken.

This realisation is bound further to undermine the trust of ordinary folk in their rulers. On the whole, this is regrettable. Democracy works best if people have faith in the integrity and competence of those in authority. The loss of trust will take a long time to repair.

Having grossly (and, I believe, deliberately) exaggerated the perils of voting for Brexit, many with powerful positions in politics and the media have continued to try to make the hairs stand up on the back of our necks.

Among the more fatuous myths is that the availability of material used in cancer treatment may be under threat after Brexit. Planes will be grounded. Traffic queues will stretch from the port of Dover to the M25.

Most of these threats are obsessively recirculated by the BBC. There was a time when almost every morning brought a new, usually bogus, tale of woe, which was promptly forgotten and replaced by another one the following day.

Certainty

It was stated with absolute certainty that thousands of high-paid financial jobs would move from London to Frankfurt or Paris. When a report was published last August forecasting the loss of 40,000 City jobs, it was warmly cited by the Bank of England (which separately suggested that 75,000 jobs could go) and taken up by the BBC.

Yet an apparently authoritative survey produced by Reuters yesterday suggests a mere 5,000 jobs will be lost in London. As I write, this cheering story has not made it even to the outer reaches of the BBC’s extensive website.

Nor, on Tuesday, did Auntie make anything of a prestigious think-tank again naming London as the world’s leading financial centre — ahead of New York (second), Frankfurt (20th) and Paris (24th). I scoured the pages of the fanatically anti-Brexit Financial Times in vain for a mention of this accolade.

 

Some obdurate Europhile politicians such as Tony Blair, who still holds out for a second referendum, had better be careful

Meanwhile, intransigent Remainers have persisted in their insinuations that anyone who voted for Brexit must be thick or deluded — or both. Don’t such supercilious remarks convey an appalling sense of arrogance and contempt?

Actually, plenty of very brainy people supported Leave — not that they get much of a showing on the BBC. Mervyn King, the former Governor of the Bank of England; the eminent Cambridge historian Robert Tombs and the distinguished philosopher John Gray are just three of them, among thousands of examples.

It is enormously to the credit of the millions of people who voted Leave that they have absorbed, without any weakening of their resolve, this unceasing onslaught of propaganda calculated to undermine their cause.

Zealots

In fact, the very opposite has happened. In a recent poll, 57 per cent of respondents agreed with the proposition that the Government should ‘get on with implementing the result of the referendum to take Britain out of the EU and in doing so take back control of our borders, laws, money and trade’. Only 22 per cent disagreed.

So pronounced is the shift in public opinion in favour of Brexit that, even in reputedly Remainer Scotland, more backed the proposition (44 per cent) than opposed it (32 per cent).

Some obdurate Europhile politicians such as Nick Clegg, Tony Blair, Chris Patten and Chuka Umunna, who still hold out for a second referendum, had better be careful. They have a diminishing band of supporters and are in danger of appearing isolated zealots.

 

Actually, plenty of very brainy people supported Leave — not that they get much of a showing on the BBC. They include Mervyn King (pictured) - the former Governor of the Bank of England

I don’t doubt, of course, that there will be difficulties ahead, just as there have been difficulties in the past. There will be compromises, too, as there have already been.

No one can be pleased that Britain will have to pay the EU a leaving fee of £37 billion, albeit spread over several decades. As I wrote last week, there are suggestions of a sell-out over fish, though I am assured by aides of Chancellor Philip Hammond that he opposes trading our fishing rights for a better economic deal.

On the other hand, the Northern Irish border presents much less of a problem than the European Union pretends. Vehicles daily cross the border between Switzerland (not in the EU) and France (EU) without hindrance, as they do between Norway (outside the EU customs union) and Sweden (inside).

 

I am assured by aides of Chancellor Philip Hammond that he opposes trading our fishing rights for a better economic deal

The truth is that EU Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier and his Remainer supporters in Parliament are using the issue of the Northern Irish border as a device to keep Britain in the customs union.

I suspect the Government will work its way through this problem, just as it has grappled doggedly with other difficulties despite continuous brickbats from Remainers.

In the face of such insults, and Michel Barnier’s infuriating condescension, Brexit Secretary David Davis has shown commendable patience.

But the real heroes of this saga are the British people, who have seen through the lies and scare stories churned out by politicians. What a contrast to the deviousness and defeatism of our ruling class.

And this, surely, is cause for hope. When we leave the EU in a year’s time, there will be untold millions who believe in a great future for this country.

AND IT IS THEY,NOT POLITICIANS

WHO WILL DELIVER

IT!

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5556457/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Despite-deviousness-rulers-leave-EU-year-today.html#ixzz5B90qQi2y
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[CHANGES OF TEXT TYPE-STYLE-ETC-ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1520-'BREXIT MEANS BREXIT'-SAYS MRS MAY

 A GIANT PONZI SCHEME THAT DESERVED TO GO TO THE WALL

...even though Carillions collapse

 shames CAPITALISM

and puts the wind in Labour's sails says ALEX BRUMMER

 

News for DAILY MAIL-A GIANT PONZI SCHEME THAT DESERVED TO GO TO THE WALL by ALEX BRUMMER

 

ALEX BRUMMER: A giant Ponzi scheme that deserved to go to the wall... even though Carillion's collapse shames capitalism and puts the wind in Labour's sails



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5273135/ALEX-BRUMMER-Carillion-deserved-wall.html#ixzz54RK5sa9n
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The collapse of the Wolverhampton -based construction group Carillion is catastrophic for its 43,000 employees at home and overseas, for the Government and for members of the stricken pension fund.

It represents a nadir for the private sector outsourcing companies which, since the era of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, have been relied upon to deliver all manner of public services, from building hospitals and schools to modernising the NHS and even providing school meals.

In the fierce scramble for business among these behemoths, Carillion was so desperate for contracts that it consistently overpromised on the work it could do for an agreed cost. When it failed to deliver on time and on price, as was the case with the new 646-bed Royal Liverpool hospital, the group went on a borrowing spree.

 

More than 20,000 jobs in the UK, and more overseas, are at risk after Carillion ran out of time to find a way to restructure its £1.5bn debt burden. Pictured: A staff member outside an office in London

Its debts grew to £900 million, an impossibly large sum to manage when its share price was going into freefall during the course of last year.

Plunge

In effect Carillion, chaired by former water company boss Philip Green, had become a mammoth Ponzi scheme in which the cash promised or received for newer contracts was effectively being used to cover up the black holes on the older contracts.

Why Carillion has careered into crisis 

The Wolverhampton-based firm, the backbone behind a raft of public infrastructure projects, is teetering over a precipice.

The company is the second largest construction firm in the UK but has debts of about £1.5billion and a pension fund shortfall of almost £600million. 

So how has it got into this mess? Most analysts agree that the answer is simple. It has over-reached itself.

Carillion they argue has its fingers in too many pies at homes and abroad from the Battersea Power station redevelopment in the UK to operations in Canada, the Middle East and the Caribbean.

The company's incessant desire to expand has resulted in it pursuing too many risky contracts - some accompanied by questionable accounting practices - that have become increasingly unprofitable. 

It has furthermore faced delays in payments in the Middle East.

The firm in recent months has found  it much harder to manage its mountainous debt pile and pension deficit.

In December Carillion managed to persuade lenders to give it more time to repay them. But the company's banks are now understood to be unwilling to lend it any more cash.

What is unconscionable in all this is that over the past two decades, before its troubles emerged, Carillion paid out vast sums in dividends to shareholders (seeking to keep them sweet) and bonuses to fat-cat directors — including former chief executive Richard Howson, dismissed last July — yet allowed the pension fund deficit to balloon to an officially estimated £900 million.

The burden of sorting this out will now fall squarely on bail-out body the Pension Protection Fund, which is financed by raising a levy on the functioning pension schemes into which millions of us contribute.

Among the more astonishing aspects of the scandal is that even as Carillion’s share price plunged in the second half of last year, Transport Secretary Chris Grayling, as well as other ministers and civil servants, still felt it was safe to gift the firm new contracts. City investors and hedge funders had already recognised that the company was struggling for survival and could no longer pay its thousands of suppliers in good time. If ever there was a case of the Government throwing good money after bad, this was it.

The business-friendly Tory Government, deliberately or naively, awarded Carillion three new contracts within days of the company admitting several major projects had gone wrong to the tune of £800 million — an announcement that provoked a 30 per cent plunge in the group’s shares last July.

A week after that first public warning that it was all going to hell in a handcart, Grayling’s department revealed that Carillion would partner another construction group on a £1.4 billion contract to work on the flagship £56 billion HS2 railway project.

Days later, Carillion was told by the Ministry of Defence it had been chosen to provide ‘catering, retail and leisure’ services for 233 military facilities. These contracts provided some temporary relief for the firm’s books.

But confidence in Carillon’s ability to manage the crisis, in spite of the new contracts, was fading fast, and in September it warned again that profits would fall short of expectations.

Yet the Government still gambled that it was a good bet, and awarded it a key infrastructure project to electrify the railway connecting Corby in Northamptonshire with London.

Ironically, the contracts for these large-scale, taxpayer-funded projects were given out at a time when Carillion’s chief executive and finance director were departing, and the share price was tanking. Yet Whitehall, in their naivety, sailed serenely on.

The collapse of Carillion comes hard on the heels of the decision by Virgin Trains and its partner Stagecoach to hand back the East Coast railway service to the Government, at a potential taxpayer cost of £2 billion. These two disasters have not only left the Government looking very silly, but also given a fillip to those supporters of Jeremy Corbyn on the Left who are convinced capitalism is wicked, and that only re-nationalisation of public services is the answer.

 

Carillion workers lined up outside a staff office to check on the status of their jobs in London yesterday morning

Sure enough, Shadow Cabinet Office minister Jon Trickett has been quick to exploit the misfortunes of Carillion’s workforce and pensioners, asking what ‘due diligence measures were undertaken before awarding contracts worth billions of taxpayer money’.

Failure

What he failed to acknowledge is that the most enthusiastic embrace of private outsourcing companies came during the last Labour government, which used firms such as Carillion to replace Britain’s Victorian hospitals, to build modern schools, expand universities and begin the process of updating the nation’s railways and roads.

Much went wrong at Carillion, including the failure of highly paid auditors KPMG to lay bare the company’s parlous financial state.

But then independent directors and major investors failed to question a record dividend payout to investors of nearly £80 million in 2016, even as the company headed for the rocks and the huge shortfall in the pension fund grew ever larger. (Labour MP Frank Field, who chairs the Pensions Select Committee, castigated Carillion for taking on ‘mega borrowings while its pension deficit ballooned’.)

None of these attacks can be very comfortable for Baroness (Sally) Morgan, former political secretary to Tony Blair, who joined the Carillion board as an independent director in June 2017, shortly before the fateful disclosure to the stock market that the company was in deep trouble.

The collapse of Carillion also shines a light on the wider outsourcing industry, and the ability of huge private firms to be responsible capitalists when they are given hundreds of millions in public money.

Other companies including Serco, Mitie, Balfour Beatty and G4S have all experienced difficulties with Government contracts: there has been a tendency for them to take on too much and become financially over-stretched.

Stupidity

With the help of experts in company turnarounds, some have managed to clean up the contracts under their management and bounce back.

But it’s too late for Carillion, which ran its affairs in a helter-skelter, irresponsible manner, yet still managed to keep the Government on side until the very end. Some have questioned why the Tories chose not to bail the firm out in the way it seems to have done with the train companies running the East Coast line.

But that surely would have sparked public fury — after all, if capitalism is to survive and thrive as Britain’s chosen economic model then weakness or stupidity must not be allowed to flourish.

Of course, Carillion’s collapse is a dreadful blow, and even now it will prove expensive for taxpayers, who will have to fund the company’s most vital operations until the insolvency practitioners can sell on the contracts.

But it would be a serious misjudgment if this debacle were used as an excuse for bringing an end to the role of private enterprise in building more efficient public services.

Enterprise and ambition in business have been the lifeblood of Britain for centuries. What a shame that it took the collapse of Carillion to remind us how it should not be done.

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.1439

Quentin Letts for the Daily Mail | Daily Mail Online

MAY 2, 2018

H.F.1543

 

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PT1-2018

 

BULLETINS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

LITTLEJOHN

 

Let's have another referendum - on scrapping the House of Lords:

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN says he reckons a lot more than

 17.4 million would vote

 to kill off the Upper House

Freedom of speech is under renewed attack, this time from unelected members of the House of Lords. They have hijacked a bill designed to update Britain's data protection laws to launch an outrageous attempt to shackle the Press.

By a slim majority, peers voted this week to compel newspapers who refuse to sign up for state regulation to pay the legal costs of anyone who brings a complaint against them, regardless of merit.

If they succeed, the financial implications could force some smaller, local papers out of business. It would give carte blanche to crooks and fraudsters to bring actions seeking to gag national newspaper investigations into their nefarious activities, secure in the knowledge that even if they lost it wouldn't cost them a penny.

This is precisely the clause which Parliament threw out last year in relation to vexatious libel claims. Now the Lords are trying to smuggle it in under the guise of data protection.

They are also looking to resurrect the second stage of the ludicrous Leveson Inquiry into the Press, which everyone thought was dead and buried.

The last one was little more than a show trial and most of the parallel criminal cases brought against innocent journalists collapsed ignominiously when they came before a jury.

 

The House of Lords has hijacked a bill designed to update Britain's data protection laws to launch an outrageous attempt to shackle the Press

None of that has deterred their Lordships from straining to get the circus back on the road. For once, the chamber was packed to the gunnels. Normally, the Lords resembles the bridge of the Mary Celeste, save for a few old sweats slumbering away on the well-upholstered leather benches.

Like many of their colleagues in the Commons, some peers are still smarting from newspaper exposures of wrongdoing by members of the Upper Chamber — everything from expenses fiddling, to coke-snorting and consorting with whores.

So they have seized their chance for revenge by using the Data Protection Bill to punish the Press — a purpose for which it was never designed.

Matthew Hancock, the new Culture Secretary, has promised to resist the Lords and overturn the amendments when the Bill comes back to the Commons.

But with the Government's wafer-thin, DUP-bolstered majority, there is a danger some Tory Brexit saboteurs — who have had a well-deserved hammering in newspapers including the Mail — may vote with Labour and the Lib Dems, who are both committed to stifling free speech.

I'm always wary of writing about the Press, because it can appear to be special pleading. But this isn't newspaper navel-gazing, it goes to the heart of what passes for our democracy.

Unelected peers, along with the opposition parties, are trying to bring the Press under the control of a new state regulator, bankrolled by ex-Formula 1 boss Max Mosley — who has been seeking his revenge on Fleet Street ever since the now-defunct News of the World exposed him for taking part in military-themed S&M orgies with prostitutes.

The regulator, called Impress, is stuffed with embittered failed journalists, Left-wing lobbyists and professional Press-haters.

This is the rabble that a majority of peers and a significant number of MPs think should have the final say in what you read in your daily newspapers.

 

Unelected peers, along with the opposition parties, are trying to bring the Press under the control of a new state regulator

No self-respecting publication of note has signed up for Impress, preferring to submit voluntarily to an independent regulatory body called IPSO, chaired by a distinguished and scrupulously impartial former Appeal Court judge, who has the power to order front-page corrections and impose fines of up to £1 million.

That clearly isn't good enough for some politicians, who want to control what appears in the Press, largely to spare themselves embarrassment.

Many of them in the Remain camp, especially, blame the Daily Mail and other publications for 'poisoning' the minds of gullible readers and tricking them into voting Leave. Their contempt for the newspaper-buying public knows no bounds.

Freedom of the Press is under unprecedented pressure, not just from politicians, but from self-appointed bigots trying to bully companies into withdrawing advertising from publications of which they disapprove. Virgin Trains' decision to stop selling the Mail is just the latest pathetic piece of politically motivated posturing aimed at appeasing those who want to silence every single opinion they disagree with.

But there's a much bigger picture here.

This isn't just about Press freedom, it's about the way in which we are governed. What the political class still haven't grasped properly about the Brexit vote is that it wasn't just a rejection of the EU, it was a vote of no confidence in the whole rotten shower of them.

It's bad enough when MPs seek to thwart the will of the people. But when unelected peers try to do the same, it's a coup against democracy.

Remoaners in the House of Lords are pledging to stop

Brexit

by any means possible. Where do these pampered, pompous poltroons get the idea that they have a divine right to sabotage

 a clear decision taken by 17.4 million people — the largest number ever to vote for anything in Britain?

Remoaners in the House of Lords are pledging to stop Brexit by any means possible, writes Richard Littlejohn 

We voted to free ourselves from an unelected, unaccountable government in Europe. Why should we now have our future decided by an unelected, unaccountable second chamber at home?

The effrontery of peers such as the absurd Andrew Adonis, a self-important quangocrat who has never been elected to anything in his life, is staggering.

So, too, Cheerful Charlie Falconer, one of the architects of this week's Lords offensive against the Press. He owes his entire political career to the fact that he was once Tony Blair's flatmate.

In 1999, when Blair got rid of the hereditaries, there were 610 members of the Lords. Today, there are 800 of them. The crusty old aristos have been replaced by a pretty unsavoury collection of political placemen, has-beens, never-wases, PR spivs and party donors.

An ermine robe is a reward for failure. The Lib Dems may have only 12 MPs (just eight in England) as a result of being roundly rejected at the ballot box. But they've got more than 100 peers in the Lords — all of whom are pledged to overturn the Brexit vote.

They can claim £300 a day tax free simply for turning up, which is about all most of them can be bothered to do.

There are plenty of well-documented examples of noble lords clocking in, claiming their allowance, and then clocking straight out again.

Two of them served jail time for fraud as a result of the expenses scandal. No wonder the Lords want to punish the newspapers which exposed them.

Brexit, when we finally get round to it, has given us the opportunity to forge a brand-new future, to liberate the way this country is governed, to make politicians properly accountable to the people who pay their wages.

Maybe we should begin with a referendum on abolishing the House of Lords once and for all.

If that were to happen, I'd wager that many more than 17.4 million would vote to kill it off. And not before time. It is an anachronism which no longer serves any useful purpose.

Until now, reform of the Lords has always been hampered by the fact that no one seems to be able to decide what should replace it.

Who cares?

Why replace it with anything, especially as these days the courts seem to have assumed the function of the second chamber?

With any luck, in attempting to defy the will of the people over Brexit and cynically seeking to shackle freedom of speech,

these arrogant Lords might just have signed their own death warrant.

*  *  *
 

I love, I love, I love my little calendar girls 

Call me male, pale and stale, but that picture of Theresa May and her new female whips at No 10 reminded me of the cast of the movie Calendar Girls, starring Celia Imrie, about the Rylstone and District branch of the Women's Institute.

I can't wait for the calendar, girls.

*Call me male, pale and stale, but that picture of Theresa May and her new female whips at No 10 reminded me of the cast of the movie Calendar Girls

 

Actress Celia Imrie (pictured) posing in her famous scene from the 2003 film Calendar Girls

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5260945/Lets-referendum-scrapping-House-Lords.html#ixzz5441IEpiC
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

 

'Let it be impressed upon your minds, let it be instilled into your children that the liberty of the press is the palladium of all civil, political, and religious rights.'-

Junius

*

The press is not only free, it is powerful. That power is ours. It is the proudest that man can enjoy.  It was not granted by monarchs; it was not gained for us by aristocracies; but it sprang from the people

[YOU!]

and with an immortal instinct, it has always worked for the people.-Disraeli.

[DON'T LET THE  UNREPRESENTATIVE   HOUSE OF LORDS GET THEIR WAY.]

ITS YOUR FREE PRESS

DON'T LOSE IT!]

The Labour man Party manifesto of 1935 called for the abolition of the House of Lords but in 1945 no such proposal was evident.

[The answer as many have voiced over the years is for a representative House of Lords selected for their already proven ability in other spheres of life and not those who's only interest is the need of a daily cash machine to encourage them  to

SERVE THEIR COUNTRY.]

[COMMENTS ARE OURS!]

 

JANUARY 12,2018

 

H.F.1436

 

[AT LONG! LONG! LAST!

- WE LEAVE

THE

CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-GODLESS EU

 IN MARCH 2019.]

*

DAILY MAIL

-At last, Hammond's on board with

BREXIT

and the

REMOANERS are DEAD and BURIED

LEAVING THE EU

 IN

MARCH,2019

 

 

THE

DOMINIC

LAWSON

Column

 

 

Finally, it’s sorted. Until yesterday, the anti-Brexiteers known as Remoaners had high hopes of Philip Hammond, the Chancellor.

But yesterday he appeared as joint author of a newspaper article with the most adamantine Brexiteer in the Cabinet, the International Trade Secretary Dr Liam Fox. The two supposed foes declared that in March 2019, Britain would not just be leaving the EU but also ‘we will leave the Customs Union and be free to negotiate the best trade deals around the world as an independent, open, trading nation’.

Although the Cabinet Brexiteers were content with Hammond’s proposal that there should be a transition period after March 2019, pending a final settlement of the country’s arrangements with the EU, the Chancellor had given the impression he was bending to the demands of the CBI that Britain remain within the Customs Union during that unspecified period.

Blunder

This they regarded as a fatal blunder — and not just because they suspected the CBI (which had campaigned for Britain to give up sterling for the euro) of seeking to keep the UK in the EU ‘by the back door’.

As Shanker Singham, chairman of the special trade commission of the Legatum Institute (a group consulted regularly by the Government), warned last week: ‘The UK must be able to provide the clarity of being outside the Customs Union on Day 1 of Brexit.

If such clarity does not exist, then other countries will not think the UK is serious about executing an independent trade policy and they will quickly lose patience and move on.’...

...In any case, the nation has not changed its collective mind since the referendum in June 2016. If anything, views have hardened in the direction set by the result. A survey of 3,293 people published on Friday by the London School of Economics showed that even those who had voted ‘Remain’ would prefer the sort of Brexit deal the LSE’s team described as ‘hard’.

A total of 51.3 per cent of Remain voters backed a Brexit deal which delivered ‘full control’ over immigration and led to lower numbers of migrants from the EU. No fewer than 54.7 per cent of Remainers said that the UK should ‘pay nothing’ to the EU by means of a ‘divorce bill’.

And 52.2 per cent of Remainers told the LSE researchers that we should entirely free British law from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Unsurprisingly, a still higher proportion of self-identifying ‘Leave’ voters supported what the LSE termed

His statement on The Andrew Marr Show last month that failure to reach an amicable deal with the EU ‘would be a very, very bad outcome for Britain’ was seen as an attack on his Brexiteer colleagues in the Cabinet (and, indeed, on the Prime Minister).

hard Brexit’.

Monstrous

This clearly disappointed the most voluble critic of the Brexiteers on the Tory parliamentary benches, Anna Soubry. In her own newspaper article yesterday, she lamented ‘a sense of resignation among most people who voted Remain that we have to “man up” and make the most of what we know will be a rotten Brexit’...

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4787508/At-Hammond-s-board-Brexit.html#ixzz4pkbL1fqi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

[9 MONTHS

TO REGAIN OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

AUGUST 14, 2017

H.F.1281 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN!

-'WE ARE AFTER ALL AN INSULAR  ISLAND PEOPLE']

 

*

 

Even Remainers now back a

'hard' Brexit:

 Most Brits ... - Daily Mail

 

. Even Remainers now back a 'hard' Brexit: Most Brits want to regain full control ...
By Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail and Kate Ferguson For Mailonline ... a straight
choice between that and no deal, with 58 per cent backing it.

 

Most Brits want to regain full control of our borders and to become free of meddling EU judges, survey reveals

  • Most polled want the UK to become free of EU judges and full border control 

  • Two thirds said they would prefer 'no deal' rather than a soft Brexit, poll found

  • Findings boost for Theresa May who says no deal is better than a bad deal

Most Remain voters now back a Brexit that gives Britain a clean break from the EU and control back of our borders, a major study has found.

Many of those who voted to stay in the European Union also now believe the country should only pay a small ‘divorce bill’ and stop EU judges ruling over the UK.

The results are a major boost for Theresa May’s Brexit stategy - and suggest diehard Remainers, such as Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable and former prime minister Tony Blair, have overestimated support for backtracking on Brexit. 

Full artical


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782712/Most-Brits-hard-Brexit-new-survey-finds.html#ixzz4pXWhGZDU
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 FREEDOM!

 

.'..We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

Soul of England

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

 DAILY MAIL

 

 

 

 

I DESPAIR OF BRITISH MUSLIMs

 

WHO CHOOSE TO LIVE UNDER

 

VIRTUAL APATHEID

 

 

 

 

 

by Dr Taj Hargey

 

is director of the MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL CENTRE of OXFORD and IMAM of the OXFORD ISLAMIC CONGREGATION

 

+

 

DECEMBER 6-2016

 

 EXTRACT

AT LONG LAST, a senior government official has the gumption to warn about the devastating effect of MASS IMMIGRATION on LOCAL COMMUNITIES, highlighting the SEGREGATION, DIVISION and TENSION it causes in SOCIETY.

Such is the scale of the problem that in a report into our increasingly fractured communities, Dame Louise Casey, the Social Cohesion tsar, has called for all migrants to

SWEAR AN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO BRITAIN

Currently, immigrants do not have to make any formal commitment to integrating with the

REST OF SOCIETY

Unless they are actually applying for

UK CITIZENSHIP

Even then it is a facade.

To live here, no newcomer need make any promises at all to be productive stakeholders in BRITISH SOCIETY

Dame Louise's suggestion of an

OATH OF ALLEGIANCE

is a step in the right direction.

 BUT IT DOES NOT GO FAR ENOUGH.

Every single person who comes

HERE

to live should be obliged to sign up, in writing to the

BRITISH WAY OF LIFE.

Think of the UNITED KINGDOM as a prestigious golf club, the kind where membership is keenly sought after.

Anyone who wants to join will be expected  to

OBEY THE RULES

-all of them, not just the one's that confer

BENEFITS.

Applicants who refuse to sign to this will be turned away at the door, and members who f

FAIL TO HONOUR THE PLEDGE

will be swiftly

EXPELLED.

 No one forces the new members to apply to join in the first place - it's entirely their free choice. But there    should be no option other than abide by the rules, and no pussyfooting around with anyone who transgresses them. Otherwise, the club will fall apart and a

GREAT INSTITUTION WILL BE DESTROYED

...Supremacist

*

...Segregated

*

 

... Irrational

 

Above all, we must accept it is not racist to face up to the nightmare of the failure of

MULTICULTURALISM

To claim that some immigrants, because of their origins should be exempt from the common duties of

INTEGRATION

-THAT'S RACIST.

It is idiotic to champion the view that all cultures are equal when some endorse misogyny,  homophobia, honour killing and so forth

To say that some people because of their  religion or the colour of the skin, can ignore BRITISH VALUES of -RESPECT-PATRIOTISM DEMOCRACY-TOLERANCE and EQUALITY-THAT'S RACIST and IRRATIONAL.

 

We need to be FORTHRIGHT and ROBUST about THIS. If IMMIGRANTS are NOT prepared to FULLY INTEGRATE into BRITISH SOCIETY, arguing that it means sacrificing their religious identity, they can head to places such as

Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Afghanistan and Sudan.

In other words, if newcomers and other immigrants are NOT HAPPY in the UNITED KINGDOM and DO NOT WISH TO BE AN INTEGRAL PART of this VIBRANT DEMOCRACY,

THEY SHOULD LEAVE.

 

*  *  *

[A BRILLIANT CONSTRUCTIVE AND COURAGEOUS AND NECESSARILY BLUNT ANALYSIS GETTING TO THE CORE OF THE PROBLEM BUT HAD THIS ARTICLE BEEN IN PLACE DECADES AGO IT WOULD HAVE FORCED THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY TO PUT IT IN PLACE. UNFORTUNATELY ,TIME IS NOT ON OUR SIDE AND THERE IS LITTLE ENTHUSIASM BY GOVERNMENT TO IMPLEMENT SUCH  A DARING BOLD AND MOST NECESSARY  NATION STATE SAVING AGENDA.   WE HOPE WE ARE PROVED WRONG ,BUT ,UNLESS WE ACHIEVE A PARLIAMENT OF PATRIOTIC -HONEST-MEMBERS  IN THE SHORTLY COMING GENERAL ELECTION THERE WILL BE NO EFFECTIVE CHANGE POSSIBLE AND THE SETTLED PEOPLE OF ENGLAND WILL PAY THE ULTIMATE HEAVY PRICE! OF A TOO DREADFUL TO CONTEMPLATE

 FAILURE.]

 

*

 

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER 6-2016

H.F.1048 BREXIT NOW

PETER OBORNE

POLITICS AND POWER

 

PETER OBORNE: Calling for war again, the Neo-cons who drowned the Middle East in blood

One of the most enduring mysteries of the modern world is the continuing influence of the 'Neo-conservatives'.

This is the name given to the political philosophy championed by George W. Bush and his British prime minister buddy, whom he once greeted with the words 'Yo, Blair . . .'

A dictionary definition of 'Neo-conservatism' is 'the assertive promotion of democracy and U.S. national interest in international affairs including through military means'.

Of course, this was the thinking behind the West's invasion of Iraq 15 years ago — a fiasco which I believe was the most morally shameful international disaster of recent times.

Not only did it result in the deaths of hundreds of thousands (including 179 British service personnel), but it also led to years of political chaos in Iraq, to the calamity of the Syrian civil war and the rise of Islamic State.

In any sane world, those responsible would now be pariahs — disgraced and discredited men ostracised by the media and reduced to writing their pitifully self-justifying memoirs.

But we don't live in such sane times.

'Neo-conservatives' is the name given to the political philosophy championed by George W. Bush and his British prime minister buddy, whom he once greeted with the words 'Yo, Blair . . .'

War-monger Blair seems to be a constant presence in BBC studios — this week alone he used the Syria crisis to justify his calamitous invasion of Iraq, arrogantly called for a second referendum on Brexit and basked in praise at an event to celebrate 20 years since the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland.

With breathtaking hubris, Blair urged military intervention in Syria. And with his typically sneering attitude to democracy, he urged Theresa May to authorise the use of the British military without a Commons debate.

He is supported by another man who pig-headedly fails to learn the lessons of history: his chief propagandist, the thuggish Alastair Campbell.

It was the mendacious Campbell, as Blair's spin doctor, who spread falsehoods about Saddam Hussein's 'weapons of mass destruction' and masterminded the use of the notorious dossier on Iraq's weapons to support claims by Bush that gave a spurious justification for Britain going to war.

There is not a jot of contrition from Campbell, who, when not also being given a comfy platform by the BBC, rages about Brexit and at critics of Blair from his splenetic Twitter account.

Meanwhile, the other Neo-conservative in the unwholesome New Labour troika that duped Britain into going to war is relatively silent. It is not hard to guess why.

Peter Mandelson has close and lucrative business connections with one of Putin's cronies. His great 'friend', metals tycoon Oleg Deripaska, along with a number of the Russian's firms, has been placed on the U.S. Government's sanctions list in response to what Washington called Moscow's 'malign activities'.

It is high time Mandelson — a member of the House of Lords — explained publicly the nature of his connections with someone so close to the Kremlin.

But the toxic influence of Neo-conservatism is not just confined to Labour. As a younger politician, former chancellor George Osborne was a junior member of that clique. A leopard doesn't change his spots. Today, he is demanding military action in Syria.

An editorial in the London Evening Standard, which he edits, was as trenchant as it was misguided. It thundered: 'Britain should take part in air strikes against Assad's forces without holding a parliamentary vote.' Across the Atlantic, although no one would ever describe Donald Trump as having a clear political philosophy, his new national security adviser, John Bolton, is a notoriously hardline Neo-con.

As one of the architects of the Iraq invasion, he refuses to apologise for that war. His presence in the White House is an added threat to world peace.

The legendary French diplomat Charles Talleyrand famously remarked about the House of Bourbon that they had 'learnt nothing and forgotten nothing'. The same applies to the Neo-conservatives as they press for the West to intervene yet again in the Middle East. The first and biggest mistake in Iraq was not to have a proper post-invasion strategy. After Saddam fell, the country degenerated into chaos and the region into a furnace of terrorism.

Likewise now, Western governments seem to have little idea of the long-term purpose of any intervention in Syria.

What are the targets? What is their long-term strategy? How do we avoid an escalation into war with Russia? We are not told.

What's more, there are chilling echoes of what happened with Iraq. Blair and Bush ordered military action before weapons inspectors had completed their task. Had they waited, they would have discovered no 'WMDs' and thus no cause for war.

 

Western governments seem to have little idea of the long-term purpose of any intervention in Syria (pictured) 

With regard to Syria, inspectors from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons are due today in the town of Douma, where at least 40 people, including women and children, were killed in an apparent chemical attack last Saturday. They should be allowed to continue fact-finding.

It cannot be stressed too much that military intervention in Syria, like that in Iraq, would be illegal under international law. The warmongering Neo-cons never seem to mind much about matters of legality. But the rest of us should.

For her part, Theresa May, as a member of the opposition, voted for the Iraq war in 2003.

This week, there were welcome signs that she might be erring on the side of caution in Syria.

Undoubtedly she is aware that Britain's defence chiefs are privately reluctant to embark on military action without a clear objective. They understand that things could spin catastrophically out of control.

Some commentators have irresponsibly spoken of a possible 'World War III'. Such feckless talk dishonours the tens of millions who died in the two terrible conflicts of the 20th century.

Nevertheless, there is a genuine danger of an escalation to military confrontation between the United States and Russia.

With such high stakes, I believe it would be a scandal if MPs are not called back early from recess to debate the issue in Parliament.

I rebuked Jeremy Corbyn two weeks ago in this column for being soft on anti-Semitism. But he is right that Parliament must assess all the evidence before Britain embarks on war, as is that Tory big beast Ken Clarke.

Mrs May knows that if she joins Trump in any Syrian military adventure and it goes wrong, she will pay a heavy political price.

The developments of the past days have reminded me of the movie Night Of The Living Dead. It tells how zombies come out of their graves to terrorise people.

This week, we have witnessed several zombies emerge from their political graves to demand this country goes to war with Assad.

The tragedy is, this is real life, not a Hollywood fiction.

Neo-conservatives have turned the Middle East into a charnel house for the past 15 years. I pray they don't get their way again and that wisdom prevails.

*
 

Unsung benefits of the Commonwealth  

Next week, the Queen hosts a meeting of the heads of state of all 53 Commonwealth member countries.

The Commonwealth has many critics, who sneer that it is a meaningless relic of Britain's colonial past. They are utterly wrong.

The Commonwealth brings together 2.3 billion people — almost a third of the world's population — through mutual understanding and shared values.

Unlike Nato, it does not use force to build trust and prevent conflict. Unlike the EU, it does not encroach on national sovereignty.

Instead, it shares values through a relaxed meeting of minds and a common history.

 

The Queen (pictured) will host a meeting of the heads of state of all 53 Commonwealth member countries next week 

The Commonwealth was instrumental in ending military rule in Pakistan in 2007 and was behind the international boycott of apartheid South Africa.

Also, it benefits members' economies — as shown by a study published last week which reveals that Commonwealth members trade 20 per cent more, on average, with each other and generate 10 per cent more foreign investment than other countries.

There is a reason for this. All Commonwealth countries share a form of the traditional British common law. We have the same legal system and any disputes tend to be settled far more easily.

Membership of the Commonwealth is one of Britain's unsung advantages — one that should be harnessed more after

 Brexit.

 



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5614351/PETER-OBORNE-Calling-war-Neo-cons-drowned-Middle-East-blood.html#ixzz5CeUpN2XW
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

Tories truce over Brexit cracks over May's compromise | Daily Mail ...

Tory Brexit truce cracks: PM told to walk away from talks by her own Eurosceptic MPs over 'intolerable' demands as she cancels trip to Brussels today after failing to do deal with DUP leader

  • David Davis confirmed some UK economy sectors may have to align with the EU 
  • Eurosceptic ex-leader Iain Duncan Smith suggested it was time to walk away 
  • Cabinet ministers feel they are being kept in the dark about the compromises
  • The DUP have made it clear it would not accept the PM's current proposals

The Tory truce on Brexit was fracturing last night as MPs warned Theresa May they would not accept further compromises with Brussels.

The Prime Minister faced a backlash after David Davis confirmed some sectors of the UK economy could have to align with the EU after Brexit to resolve the Irish border issue.

Former leader Iain Duncan Smith – who has acted as a bridge between No 10 and Eurosceptic MPs until now – described the proposal as 'intolerable' and suggested it was time to walk away from the talks.

 

The Prime Minister had planned to return to Brussels today to try to complete a divorce deal with the EU, but this has been cancelled

Eurosceptic Cabinet ministers also complained they were being kept in the dark about the extent of the compromises, both on the Irish border and the European Court of Justice.

Boris Johnson and Michael Gove are said to be leading a revolt of Brexiteers who have a 'genuine fear' that Mrs May is going to push through a soft option.

The Foreign Secretary reportedly confronted the Prime Minister in a dramatic clash during Cabinet yesterday over her negotiating strategy.

A senior insider told The Sun: 'Cabinet is in the dark about what the PM is doing, which is a very strange state of affairs to be in.' 

 

Michael Gove and Boris Johnson are said to be leading a revolt of Brexiteers who have a 'genuine fear' that Mrs May is going to push through a soft option

Meanwhile the DUP, whose ten MPs prop up the Government, made it clear it would not accept the plans put forward by the Prime Minister on Monday to secure a breakthrough on a post-Brexit trade deal.

Talks with European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker stalled on Monday after DUP leader Arlene Foster vetoed plans for a compromise on the status of the Irish border.

The Prime Minister had planned to return to Brussels today to try to complete a divorce deal with the EU.

But the trip was cancelled last night after Mrs Foster said she would not accept plans to retain 'regulatory alignment' between Northern Ireland and the Republic after Brexit.

Government sources insisted that the proposal on the Irish border was only a 'backstop' designed to open the door to trade talks this month.

 

David Davis confirmed some sectors of the UK economy could have to align with the EU after Brexit to resolve the Irish border issue

A source said the proposal was limited to a few areas linked to the Good Friday Agreement, such as agriculture and energy.

But Mr Duncan Smith warned it could 'box in' the UK, making it a 'supplicant' to Brussels even after Brexit, and preventing the Government striking trade deals.

Mrs May began the day by telling the Cabinet she was 'very close to getting agreement' with the EU on a divorce deal, which she hopes could unlock the door to the start of trade talks. The PM told ministers there were 'only a small number of issues outstanding'.

But a Cabinet source said the detail of the plans had barely been discussed by Mrs May at a meeting of the Cabinet yesterday.

'There is not a lot of clarity here,' the source said. 'People want to be helpful to the PM in this, but they are befuddled by the approach she has taken. People want to see the detail and it is not forthcoming – that is a worry.' Whitehall sources last night revealed that even Mr Davis did not learn that the phrase 'regulatory alignment' had been inserted into a proposed agreement with Brussels until Sunday.

One former minister last night warned the crisis could shorten Mrs May's tenure in No 10, saying: 'The PM is in a very weak position and she needs to wake up to the fact. She is making her position less and less tenable.' One EU ambassador said: 'We cannot go on like this, with no idea what the UK wants. She just has to have the conversation with her own cabinet, and if that upsets someone, or someone resigns, so be it.'

 

Iain Duncan Smith – who has acted as a bridge between No 10 and Eurosceptic MPs until now – described the proposal as 'intolerable'

Tory Sir Bill Cash said any commitment to align all or part of the UK's laws with the EU would be 'massively difficult' to accept.

Former Brexit minister David Jones said the move would make it difficult to strike free trade deals with countries outside the EU. He called the idea 'dangerous', adding: 'If we are aligned with the EU on agriculture, for example, it would be impossible to conclude any meaningful free trade agreements with third countries.'

Jacob Rees-Mogg described the issue as an 'indelible red line' and voiced 'gratitude' to the DUP for vetoing the deal.

What's the truth about trade across the Irish border? 

Analysis by Jack Doyle 

Northern Ireland to Ireland

It might be assumed that trade between Northern Ireland and the Republic formed a very significant part of the province's economy.

But official data shows its economic relationship with the rest of the UK is much more significant. 

Around two thirds of Northern Ireland's turnover involves sales within the province. 

Exports to Great Britain make up 21 per cent, while those to the Republic are just five per cent and to the rest of the EU just three per cent.

 

DUP Sammy Wilson said Northern Irish trade with the UK is more important than with the Republic of Ireland and the rest of Europe

According to the Legatum Institute think tank, trade patterns from before the UK joined the EU in 1973 have proved 'remarkably resilient'.

DUP MP Sammy Wilson has said: 'Our main market is not the Irish Republic. It is not even the whole of the EU. Our main market is the UK, and the integrity of the single UK market is far more important to us, to people who work in Northern Ireland, than having some kind of regulatory convergence or continuance with the rest of Europe.'

Ireland to Great Britain

By contrast to the relatively small scale of its trade with Northern Ireland, the Republic has very significant trade links with Great Britain, its second biggest trading partner. More than 12 per cent of Irish exports go to Great Britain, and 18 per cent of services (compared to 1.6 per cent to Northern Ireland).

It also imports a huge amount from Great Britain, which accounts for 25 per cent of its imports. But because of the size of the two economies, the Republic has a lot more to lose in relative terms from the talks collapsing and no agreement being made on trade.

Estimates of the damage to Irish GDP from a collapse in talks suggest it could fall by up to 3 per cent. Henry Newman, of the Open Europe think tank, warns the Irish have the most to lose of any EU state from no trade deal, and are 'playing with fire'.

 

Walk away from Brexit talks unless the EU drops 'intolerable' demands, Iain Duncan Smith tells Theresa May 

Iain Duncan Smith last night urged Theresa May to abandon Brexit talks unless the EU agrees to back away from its 'intolerable' demands.

In an ominous move, the former Conservative leader went public about his growing concerns with the direction of the negotiations on a potential divorce deal.

Mr Duncan Smith said accepting the EU's demands would leave the UK a 'supplicant' nation after Brexit.

 

Iain Duncan Smith last night urged Theresa May to abandon Brexit talks unless the EU agrees to back away from its 'intolerable' demands

He said he had told the PM: 'We have reached the point where really these sets of demands are demands too far.'

He added that it was time to tell the EU: 'We're not prepared to go down this road any longer, this is not working, we will not box ourselves in.'

Mr Duncan Smith has acted as a bridge between No 10 and the Eurosceptic wing of the Tory Party, helping to persuade MPs to back Mrs May and avoid rocking the boat. His decision to speak out underlines the difficulty Mrs May now faces in persuading the Right of the party to back her approach to Brexit.

But last night Mr Duncan Smith said he could not accept plans to resolve the Irish border issue by signing up to a system of 'regulatory alignment' that could tie sectors of the whole UK economy to Brussels rules after Brexit.

He said it was 'not just the DUP' who were unhappy about a plan that would 'give away our status before we even get to the trade arrangements'. He said agreeing to the demand from Dublin and Brussels would 'box in' the UK's future options and limit our ability to negotiate future trade deals with other countries.

Mr Duncan Smith also voiced grave reservations about allowing any future role for the European Court of Justice, which Brussels is saying should continue to have jurisdiction over EU citizens' rights in Britain.

He told the BBC: 'We are beginning to stare at the edge of what is a price that we simply cannot afford to pay.' Mr Duncan Smith said the EU 'needs to budge'. He said the UK was 'reaching the point fairly fast' where it should just walk away and prepare to leave the EU without a trade deal.

He suggested no deal would be better than a 'wholly intolerable one that leaves us boxed in and unable to make the kind of arrangements with the US, Australia, India and all these other countries that we want to make arrangements with'.

 

Mr Duncan Smith's decision to speak out underlines the difficulty Mrs May now faces in persuading the Right of the party to back her approach to Brexit

And he warned there was a danger that 'we will end up being supplicants in this process rather than being equal partners.'

He added: 'I think the PM is recognising that. It's just becoming very clear that no matter what we say that we will help them with, there is another demand placed there and that stands in the way of trade.'

Signalling the tensions fracturing the Tory Party, former education secretary Nicky Morgan last night rounded on Mr Duncan Smith, saying: 'This is madness. Walking away when the Brexiteers encounter difficulties they never bothered to anticipate is not in the national interest.'



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5149619/Tories-truce-Brexit-cracks-Mays-compromise.html#ixzz50yAGpK8j
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

DECEMBER 6,2017

*  *  *

H.F.1413 -[THERE MUST BE NO SURRENDER TO EU DEMANDS-ENGLAND MUST BE  FREE AS BEFORE TRAITORS WITHIN SOLD US TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU IN 1972 TO ENABLE GERMANY TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE. BRUSSELS IS A POODLE OF THE FOURTH REICH-THE REAL POWER IS IN BERLIN.]

TOM UTLEY: Why Mrs U dreads being asked what she does for a living

TOM UTLEY: Abortion and why, in trendy middle-class circles, Mrs U dreads being asked what she does for a living

 

Whatever we may think about abortion, shouldn’t everyone brought up in our tradition of free expression feel uneasy about this week’s decision to ban pro-Life campaigners from setting up shop outside a clinic where terminations are performed?

Indeed, it’s a measure of how dominant and intolerant social liberalism has become in modern Britain that Mrs U has come to dread being asked what she does for a living.

It’s not that she’s ashamed of her job —on the contrary, she’s proud of it and enjoys the fulfilment of working for what she regards as a hugely important cause.

It’s just that in the metropolitan, middle-class circles in which we move, you will often hear a sharp intake of breath around the dinner table when she mentions she works for SPUC.

Reaction

A frisson of embarrassment tends to grip the company, putting a dampener on the whole evening, as if she had confessed to working for the Ku Klux Klan.

In fact, of course, my wife’s views on the moral value of human life, from the moment of conception to the grave, are shared by billions of people around the globe.

They are held by every mainstream world religion and church — Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim and more — and have been espoused by philosophers for millennia.

Yet this cuts no ice at the parties we attend, on the increasingly rare occasions when we’re asked. Imagine the reaction at a BBC staff meeting if anyone were to admit to supporting Brexit, and you’ll get the idea.

I should also declare that my wife donates a modest monthly sum (or to be more accurate, I give it at her instigation, since my higher tax rate makes the gift aid top-up worth more) to a charity called the Good Counsel Network (GCN).

This is one of those affected by Tuesday night’s Public Space Protection Order, issued by Ealing Council in West London to keep campaigners away from the entrance to the local Marie Stopes abortion clinic.

Now, with my weakness for seeing both sides of an argument, I can well understand the thinking behind the council’s order.

For more than two decades, six days a week, 52 weeks of the year, members of the GCN have gathered on the grass verge outside the clinic to pray, sing hymns and try to persuade pregnant women to seek alternatives to abortion.

 

Indeed, it’s a measure of how dominant and intolerant social liberalism has become in modern Britain that Mrs U has come to dread being asked what she does for a living

As anyone can imagine, this must be irritating to local residents. Nor is it hard to see that it could be upsetting to women who’ve taken the traumatic decision to terminate and don’t want anyone to renew any doubts or try to change their minds at the last moment.

Let me also put it on record that I do not for one moment defend the bullying tactics allegedly adopted by some anti-abortion protesters outside clinics.

No matter how strongly they may feel about the sanctity of human life, it strikes me as cruel to shout ‘murderess’ at women arriving for terminations, or to torment them by calling them ‘mum’ and thrusting teddy bears into their hands.

How much this goes on, I just don’t know. It is even possible that rogue members of the GCN may have resorted to such conduct, which is said to be increasingly widespread among anti-abortionists in the U.S.

All I can say, because I have Mrs U’s word for it, is that the people who run the group disapprove strongly of bullying and regard it as counter-productive. They see it as their mission to show kindness to women who may be having doubts and to offer them practical help with alternatives — whether financial support, within their limited resources, or advice on putting babies up for adoption.

Fanatics

In the huge majority of cases, perhaps needless to say, their efforts come to nothing. But on those rare occasions when they succeed in persuading women to carry a pregnancy through to childbirth, the results are often profoundly moving.

They say the mothers concerned almost always bless them ever afterwards for talking them out of abortion and helping them through.

Yet from the way groups such as the GCN are portrayed in the liberal media, you would think these kindly, predominantly mild-mannered and middle-aged Christians were dangerous fanatics, spewing religious hatred.

I think of a Channel 4 Dispatches programme — entitled Undercover: Britain’s Abortion Extremists — which claimed to have ‘infiltrated’ the network. Complete with wobbly shots from a ‘hidden camera’ and indistinct recordings with subtitles, it was made to appear almost as if the documentary makers had risked their lives to unearth the truth behind a sinister terrorist organisation.

Yet GCN has never made the slightest secret of its mission, methods or purpose, while the programme told us nothing that we wouldn’t have learned if the camera had been held rock-steady and in full view, with a decent quality sound recording.

This kind of casual dishonesty is typical of campaigners who call themselves pro-Choice (by which naturally they mean a woman’s choice of whether or not to abort — never an expectant father’s, let alone that of an unborn life).

All too often, they speak in euphemisms, designed to strip the abortion issue of any moral dimension, as if ending a potential human life has no more profound significance than having an appendix removed.

Take this week, when a councillor interviewed on the news after Tuesday’s vote said that Ealing had struck a blow to protect women seeking a ‘legally available healthcare treatment’.

Honest

Well, no one denies that abortion is legally available. But a ‘healthcare treatment’? Under the letter of the 1967 Abortion Act, that’s what it ought to be, since terminations were supposed to be permitted only when two doctors certified independently that continuing a pregnancy would injure the physical or mental health of the woman or existing children, or if the baby was likely to be born severely handicapped.

But let’s be honest. While, yes, some cases genuinely meet these criteria, the great majority of the 190,406 abortions carried out in the UK in 2016 simply don’t. Only by stretching the meaning of the words ‘injury to health’ to snapping point does healthcare come into the equation.

Or take that oft-repeated platitude of the pro-Choice lobby: ‘No woman takes the decision to have an abortion lightly.’ Again, this is true of a great many women who will testify that the decision was one of the most agonising of their lives.

But ‘no woman’ decides lightly? How, then, can it be explained that nearly 40 per cent of those 190,406 operations performed in 2016 were repeat terminations?

No, the fact is that abortion is increasingly seen as an accepted and commonplace procedure, with doctors and clinics ignoring the law and simply rubber-stamping applications, with no questions asked.

It has come to the point where an encounter with groups such as the Good Counsel Network can be a pregnant woman’s first contact with anyone prepared to put the other side of the argument, and reinforce instinctive doubts that so many women feel.

Many of us have met women who went through with abortions and say they’ve bitterly regretted it ever since.

Isn’t it a desperately sad reflection on our society that this historic Public Space Protection Order was directed not against violent demonstrators, yelling hatred of our way of life, but against well-meaning Christians, trying to do good?

 



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5610345/TOM-UTLEY-Abortion-Mrs-U-dreads-asked-does-living.html#ixzz5CfRkhaev
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

 

 

H.F.1531

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

-RICHARD LITTLEJOHN

 

 

Theresa May should forget the magazine interviews and get on with

BREXIT

 

Don't relax Theresa...

JUST DO IT!

[FOR

ENGLAND.]

 

 

EXTRACT

...BUT far from putting Brexit at the top of her agenda, she's been behaving as if she won a GENERAL ELECTION.

Policies contained in the last Tory manifesto have been jettisoned and others introduced.

She appointed a fellow REMAINER , Philip Hammond, as Chancellor even though he thought our economic future would be better off within the EU. Judging by his Autumn Statement, the fears of those of us who think we can't depend on Ay and Hammond delivering a clean break

MAY BE JUSTIFIED.

 The essentially positive reaction to his budget measures baffled me. Here was a Conservative targeting key Tory voters-PENSIONERS, people who have invested in BUY to LET, and the SELF EMPLOYED.  Not to mention letting rip the nation's CRIPPLING DEBT and adopting LABOUR POLICY on EXECUTIVE PAY RESTRAINT'.

The GREED of some FAT CATS is an undeniable DISGRACE.

[But it is those revolving door GREED of CIVIL SERVANTS and others in QUANGOS and elsewhere which we believe should be first on the TARGET LIST.]

-but since when has it been Tory policy to interfere in the salary structures of PRIVATE COMPANIES?

Despite the inevitable stories from the Boys in the Bubble about 'tensions' between No 10 and No 11, Mother Theresa must have signed off on the STATEMENT.  Meanwhile the pair of them seem  to take an inordinate delight in belittling

BORIS JOHNSON

WHO LED THE

LEAVE CAMPAIGN

AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY

Parallels have been drawn between BREXIT and Donald TRUMP'S victory in the STATES. the difference is:

TRUMP really is setting about draining the swamp in WASHINGTON. as he puts it, and ushering in a NEW ORDER.

In BRITAIN, the LOSERS are STILL in the DRIVING SEAT.

With the notable exceptions of Call Me Dave and Boy George, the political establishment HOLDS SWAY

AS Nigel Farage pointed out last week, all they've done is rearrange some of the

DECKCHAIRS.

Mrs May might be mistress of all she surveys right now

BUT

SHE'S THERE ON TRUST

And, judging by her interview at the weekend-which bordered on hubris-for a women who claims that

BREXIT

keeps her awake at night, she does seem to be enjoying HERSELF

rather more than is seemly.

*

 

[AS WE HAVE SAID ON MANY OCCASIONS SINCE JUNE 23-2016

 DO IT!

 

Full article

[IT WILL BE THANKS TO THE CONTINUOUS VOICE OF  RICHARD LITTLEJOHN AND MANY OTHER PATRIOTS IN THE FREE PRESS AND ELSEWHERE THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THE PROMISE OF PARLIAMENT THAT THE VOTE FOR

A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND

 BE HONOURED AT THE EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY AND NOT BECOME A FRUITLESS EXPEDITION BY TURNCOATS AND TRAITOROUS TIMEWASTERS. HISTORY IS IN THE MAKING AND THOSE WHO BETRAY THE TRUST LAID AT THEIR DOOR  BY THEIR DOUBLE-FACED ACTIONS WILL BE FOR EVER IN THE ANNALS OF ENGLISH FREEDOM BE CAST AS PERFIDIOUS -PRETENTIOUS TRAITORS.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

NOVEMBER 29-2016

 

H. F. 1040 BREXIT NOW

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Happy New Year: Hundreds of top Khazarian mobsters, including the Bush family, renditioned to Gitmo

 

In a historic moment of poetic justice, most of the U.S.-based top perpetrators of the fake “war on terror” have now themselves been renditioned to the U.S. Navy camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Pentagon sources say.  “The Rothschild assets George Soros, Peter Munk, Peter Sutherland, the Bushes, the Podestas, and many others may have been airlifted to Gitmo for military tribunals, as the Department of Defense spends $500M to upgrade the prison and send more military police and Marines,” the sources say.

In one of many signs of just how historic the new American revolution is, “30 congressmen will not be returning in the new year,” the Pentagon sources say.  CIA sources also confirm that former U.S. President Bill Clinton, hoping for a plea bargain, is spilling the beans on people like former CIA head John Brennan, top U.S. Mossad agent Rahm Emmanuel, former Vice President Dick Cheney, and many others.

Furthemore, as U.S. President Donald Trump proclaims Janaury 2018 to be “Anti-Slavery Month,”
 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-proclaims-january-2018-national-slavery-human-trafficking-prevention-month/

… human trafficking centers around the world are being raided and shut down.  In Saudi Arabia, 3,000 child sex slaves have been freed, according to Russian FSB sources.  In the U.S., “there was a power outage on December 27th at the “pedo heaven Disneyland,” as the place was raided by special forces fighting human slavers, the Pentagon sources say.  In apparently connected events, Washington Post heir Bill Graham and Jordan Feldstein, the brother of the actor Jonah Hill, died last week, the sources point out.

Another move was that Julian Assange “was extracted from the Ecuadorian Embassy to take down the cabal, and he may be pardoned along with Mike Flynn,” the sources add.

Also, “On Christmas day, Delta Force raided a mansion owned by former President Barack Obama in …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Merry Christmas:  The 13 “Illuminati” bloodline families sue for peace

Peace on earth and goodwill to all (and not just men, but all life forms) is looking like a realistic goal for 2018 now that the 13 “Illuminati” * bloodline families, seeing their ancient rule of planet Earth collapsing, are suing for peace.  Last week a representative of the G7 (Germany, the U.K., the corporate U.S., Japan, Italy, France, and Canada) met with a representative of the White Dragon Society (WDS) to discuss peace terms, according to a WDS member who was present at the meeting.  The G7, of course, is the political front for the 13 bloodline families.  There can be no doubt that this meeting was made possible by people inside the military-industrial complex acting in the spirit of Jesus Christ, and for this we wish them all “a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.”

The bloodline offer to negotiate peace is directly connected to the state of emergency that was declared last week by USA President Donald Trump.  If you have not seen it yet, please read the historic document in the link below.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-congress-united-states-6/

“After Hanukkah, Trump declared a state of emergency and signed an executive order on December 20th freezing the assets of those accused of human rights abuses and corruption, a catch-all to bankrupt the Bushes, Clintons, Soros, Obama, the Cabal, and the global Jewish mafia,” was how a Pentagon source summed up the situation.

“The national emergency allows Trump to seize assets and unleash the military to carry out mass arrests and adjudicate via military tribunals, effectively imposing martial law,” the source continues.

The Pentagon source also sent a copy of this photograph with the explanation, “Trump wears purple when unveiling his national security strategy on December 18th in a victory lap over the Soros/Hillary purple revolution, and drinks water with both hands to simulate handcuffs.”

Clearly reacting to this situation, the representative of the bloodlines set the meeting for December 23rd, the birthday of the Japanese Emperor, and claimed to be a representative of the Imperial family as well as the G7.  The representative, who acted as if he was negotiating a surrender, said the bloodlines want to keep existing nation-states and institutions as they are, but…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Letter to the Editor – Experimental Quantum Anti-Gravity Successfully Replicated

 

I would like to let you know that my anti-gravity experiments have been successfully replicated by the Aerospace Engineering Department at the New Sciences & Technologies Faculty of the University of Tehran in the Islamic Republic of Iran. I have developed complete quantum anti-gravity hypothesis with direct testable predictions that are simple, clear, easy, and inexpensive.

As you know, present-day quantum gravity theories suffer from too many mathematical space dimensions, and from too few conclusive experimental results.

My hypothesis is simple, clear, and subject to easy empirical verification.  I offer clear explanation of the principles of quantum gravity, and also precisely describe how to perform simple and inexpensive experiments to verify it.

In order to clearly understand quantum anti-gravity, please follow these 8 steps:

  1. Start from this brief overview — Quantum Gravity in a Nutshell
  2. The theoretical basis for quantum gravity are the Abraham’s equations of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy, and their empirical counterpart — the Abraham force
  3. To understand how the Biefeld-Brown effect works, you need to be clear where B-B vectors point — “up” or “down”
  4. The Biefeld-Brown effect is an instance of the Abraham force.
  5. Study the section about gyroscope’s anomalous effect.
  6. Please, study all the material on THE BOYD BUSHMAN EFFECT page in order to appreciate the potential complex magnetic fields have for shaping quantum gravity interactions.
  7. Now, you are ready to read the short introduction to quantum gravity.
  8. Perform two simple experiments for empirical verification.

The following are the 10 “mysteries” that my hypothesis sheds new light upon:

  1. The main prediction of my hypothesis (2016) is that anti-hydrogen will anti-gravitate.
  2. Gravitational waves mystery.
  3. EmDrive mystery.
  4. Solar mystery.
  5. Mass mystery.
  6. Bicycle mystery.
  7. Propeller  mystery.
  8. Cloud mystery.
  9. Pioneer mystery.
  10. Missing mystery.

I have designed 4 progressively more complex experiments, and we have successfully performed one of them, the one of medium difficulty, which constitutes:

The empirical discovery of hitherto unknown physical interaction between angular momentum of a spinning gyroscope and Earth’s magnetic and electric fields.

To perform this experiment, we need a gyroscope with a vertical support, and magnetic and electric shielding cages.

According to my hypothesis, there will be a measurable time difference between a freely spinning gyroscope inside, and outside the cages.  A gyroscope freely spinning inside both cages will come to rest in less time than when spinning outside them.

The experiment was performed successfully and was recorded in the following two videos:

To have a clear idea what is involved in the experiment, please take a closer look at the above two videos first.

For the experiment, we used the following small and light gyroscope at 10,000 rpm:

It would be much better to use a heavier gyro, because the heavier the gyro, the stronger the effect, at the same rate of rpm.

The value of angular velocity (rpm) is important only insofar as to generate sufficient angular momentum to allow the gyro to spin freely for a longer time before it comes to rest.

The objective of the experiment was to obtain two values of the gyro’s run time:

  • Outside the shielding;
  • Inside the shielding.

In my experiment, the two sample values are, respectively:

  • 55.54 seconds
  • 51.87 seconds

There was a 3.67 second difference, which amounts to 6.6%.  The time difference is directly proportional to the quality and quantity of electrostatic shielding of the Faraday cage. Applying the magnetic shielding in addition to the electric one would further increase the time difference.

As you can see in the video, it is important that the gyro is elevated by means of a vertical support.  Ideally, gyro should start spinning as close to a vertical position as possible, and also be able to pass lower, while still spinning, than its horizontal position.

The reason for this effect is that the gyroscope inside the cages will be spinning in reduced strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, which in turn reduces the strength of the Biefeld-Brown effect acting upon it.

The gyroscope outside the cages, spinning in the undiminished strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, is subject to the full influence of the Biefeld-Brown effect that causes the gyroscope to resist Earth’s gravity pull, which happens to be none other than pure natural antigravity effect.

OBJECTIONS

  • All conductors, like the brass gyro, exhibit an effective diamagnetism when they experience a changing magnetic field.  The Lorentz force on electrons causes them to circulate around forming eddy currents.  The eddy currents then produce an induced magnetic field that opposes the applied field and resist the conductor’s motion.

—  That is true for both, the gyro spinning inside and outside the Faraday cage in Earth’s magnetic field.  It does not make any difference.

  • But the gyro’s induced magnetic field will generate eddy currents in the Faraday cage and the resultant magnetic field will slow down gyro’s spin (magnetic breaking), and hence the whole effect.  It is like dropping a magnet down a copper pipe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dFFL8TDt2Q

—   The analogy in the video applies, but only in principle.  Spinning brass gyro is not a strong neodymium magnet, and if, in principle, it generates any magnetic field, it is so weak that it will not even affect a needle of a compass.  As opposed to the copper pipe in the video, the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage has much larger diameter (the inverse-square law), so it is enough to drop a strong neodymium magnet down the Faraday cage to see how much it would slow down, if at all.  As you can see in the above video, even few empty slits in the copper pipe greatly weaken the eddy currents, this being the reason for using enamel-coated copper mesh.  Diamagnetic materials, like brass, or copper, have a relative magnetic permeability that is less than or equal to 1, and therefore a magnetic susceptibility less than or equal to 0, since susceptibility is defined as χv=μv−1.  This means that diamagnetic materials, in principle, are repelled by magnetic fields.  However, since diamagnetism is such a weak property, its effects are not observable in everyday life.  Moreover, there is a big difference between Faraday cage made of solid copper, and one made of enamel-coated copper mesh.  The magnetic field induced in the gyro is weak, because Earth’s magnetic field is weak, so whatever little eddy currents could be induced by the gyro in solid copper Faraday cage will become irrelevant in the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage, as you can see in the following two videos:

Even though it is true that the experiment, in principle, is open to influences from various phenomena, including the Carnegie curve, the overall result is clearly well beyond being attributed exclusively to these other phenomena.

To completely eliminate above objections, magnetic shielding needs to be applied in addition to the Faraday cage, and the gyro should be custom-made from a material which does not allow for eddy currents to flow in it.

Naturally,  I will be happy to answer any questions that you may have for me regarding the theoretical foundations as well as replication of the experiment.

With respect and much gratitude,  I am
Sincerely yours,

U.S. troops deploy worldwide with 10,000 sealed indictments to take down Khazarian mob

U.S. President Donald Trump spent the weekend at Camp David with his top generals to map out the exact strategy for decapitating the Khazarian mafia worldwide, say Pentagon sources.  “The Atlanta airport was shut down, while the Department of Defense refused to disclose the locations of 44,000 U.S. troops who may be involved in terminating the cabal worldwide,” a senior Pentagon source said.  There are now close to 10,000 sealed indictments as more and more of the Khazarian criminals give up evidence on their colleagues, the sources say.

There are also many extra-judicial killings going on.  “The liberal sanctuary city mayor of San Francisco, Edwin Lee, dropped dead after an illegal alien was found not guilty in the murder of Kate Steinle even after his confession,” one source notes.  “Lee’s death is a message to the Democrats and sanctuary city mayors like Rahm Emmanuel of Chicago and Bill De Blasio of New York City,” the source warns.

The Khazarian mob is also killing off lots of people.  In Japan, two former executives of Toshiba, Atsutoshi Nishida and Taizo Nishimura, suddenly died in the past two months because they were about to provide evidence about the March 11, 2011 Fukushima tsunami and nuclear terror attack against Japan, according to sources close to the royal family.

This attack was carried out by henchmen of the Rockefeller family, whose members include Hillary and Bill Clinton, the sources say.  The Rockellers, in turn, were taking orders from the fascist P2 Freemason lodge, they say.  The Rockefeller family, by the way, has elected Mel Rockefeller, the son of Nelson Rockefeller, as the new family head, these sources added.

In Canada, Barry Sherman, owner of the Canadian pharmaceutical giant Apotex, was found hanging dead alongside his wife Honey by the family’s indoor pool.  According to CIA sources, Sherman was …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

H.F.1430

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED AS ILLEGAL

 

A criminalized organisation

 

Monday 10th October,2005

 London.

 

BRITAIN CAN LEAVE

THIS ILLEGAL ‘FESTERING DUSTBIN OF CORRUPTION’ TOMORROW

 

The European Union Collective is illegal and so extensively criminalized that it has become all but indistinguishable from a criminal organization.

 

It is illegal because key EU treaties were procured by means of slush fund payments.

 
It is criminal because, being born in corruption, its procedures are designed to mask the corrupt activities of many of its officials, while it publishes false accounts.
 
Britain is free to leave immediately, as explained below.

 

These findings are published today the 10th October 2005 in the latest issue of International Currency Review, the London -based Journal of the International Financial Community.

 

·                The fraudulence of the European Commission’s accounts necessitates urgent consideration of its Triple-A Credit Rating by the leading Rating Agencies. Precise evidence of the fraudulence of the EC’s accounts is presented in the issue. (Normally this scandalous state of affairs is ‘successfully’ shoved under the carpet).

·                International Currency Review has advised the agencies accordingly, and anticipates that they will carry out the necessary overdue reassessment of the EU’s ‘integrity’. In the event that zero action is taken, given the extreme gravity of the evidence of institutionalised accounting fraud presented in the journal, the integrity of the Credit Rating Agencies themselves may be called into question - not least by International Currency Review.

 

This may have repercussions for the International Financial Community generally.

*

WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS ILLEGAL AND ILLEGITIMATE

 

But first things first. The illegitimacy and illegality of the European Union-and thus of ALL its constituent structures, including the European Central Bank - arises from the following facts:

 

The British Treaty of Accession was signed by two agents of the German ‘Black’ Nazi intelligence continuum, DVD -This is the ultra-secret German Nazi continuing ‘Black Operations’ intelligence organisation based, appropriately enough, in Dachau, near Munich.

 

Intelligence concerning the existence was passed to the Editor of International Currency Review: Christopher Story FRSA - Veteran UK financial and intelligence analyst

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org Telephone +44-(0) 20-7222 3836

 

by

 

British intelligence sources

 

 

The Editor then had its contents checked out by high -level US intelligence contacts, who confirmed the entity’s existence and importance.

 

There remains some uncertainty about what the initials DVD stand for- alternatively Deutsche Versicherungs Dienst [German Insurance Agency] or else Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst [German Defence Agency] - the context here being that DVD is the intelligence [Abwehr] continuum of the

 

NAZI INTERNATIONAL

 

Originally established by the Nazi Abwehr as the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid in 1942.

 

Therefore, in this context, ‘insurance’ would mean ‘insurance’ would mean ‘insuring the continuity of Nazi global hegemony strategy for the controlling

a

Thousand-Year Reich.’

 

While ‘defence’ in this same context would mean ‘defending’ the continuing covert Nazi global hegemony strategy.

 

DVD is not funded by the German Government and Taxpayer, since it operates its own covert sources of giga-finance; but its primary operations and strategy are routinely approved by the German Chancellery.

 

Any official denial of this fact is a lie

 

To continue:

 

The signatories, both - of The British treaty of Accession whom received substantial financial rewards for their ‘co-operation’, were Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon. Together with the late Roy Jenkins, they were recruited by the German Abwehr while studying at Balliol College, Oxford. This intelligence has emerged since the recent death of Sir Edward Heath [Another Traitor amongst many who have been honoured by the Queen with a title]

 

*

THE E.U. TREATIES ARE ROUTINELY PROCURED BY FRAUDULENT MEANS:

 

That is to say, official signatories and senior policymakers/operatives have received substantial corrupt payments, remitted to their secret offshore bank accounts, in exchange for their ‘co-operation’ in pushing through successive E.U. Treaties.

 

The bribery funds are derived from a colossal secret ‘Black Operations’ slush fund account located in Switzerland -the title and size of which is divulged in the REPORT.

 

For instance:

 

$5.0 billion was allocated in 2004 from the secret Swiss slush fund to ‘procure’ the European Constitution Treaty, divided into two branches:

 

1)             $2.5 billion was allocated (and paid out) on completion of the Inter Governmental Conference [IGC], in July/August of 2004, with $100 million allocated for each of the 25 EU’Member States’. The corrupt bribery funds were remitted to the National officials concerned in Euros.

2)              

 

A further $2.5 billion ($100 million for each ‘Member State’) was payable on ratification of the Collective Treaty.

 

 

Given the negative referendum results delivered by the French and Dutch electorates, payment of the second branch has been a matter of understandable tension and contention ever since, not least since such ‘Black’ remittances, which are common place at the intergovernmental level are illegal -and therefore ‘never happened’.

 

 

Intelligence sources have provided International Currency Review with the NAME of the secret Swiss bank account, the vast amount of ‘Black’ money it holds, the amounts allocated for each corrupted EU ‘Member State’, plus the names of three of the most prominent alleged recipients of ‘Black’ payments, together with details of the alleged transactions concerned.

 

[WE DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK BUT THIS REPORT MUST PUT THE PRO-EUROPE FACTION LITERALLY IN A SPIN AND FEAR OF THE OUTCOME WHEN THE CONSPIRACY IS FULLY REVEALED]

 

We have more to follow

 

*

 

EXPOSURES TRIGGERED BY THE DEATH OF

SIR EDWARD HEATH

also see

These revelations have become possible following the death of Sir Edward Heath, who was a German agent and asset for six decades - the longest known foreign intelligence penetration in modern history.

 

It is significant that the extensive Obituary of Heath published in the Guardian on 18th July 2005, closed with the cryptic sentence:

 

‘He [Heath] remained determined that he would be vindicated, until close to the end.

 

This referred to the fact that when Heath visited Salzburg in 2003, ostensibly to attend the Music Festival there, the real reason for his visit was that he had been summoned to Dachau, where DVD officers warned him that

British intelligence were intending to confront him with his treachery.

 

It is reported that, on hearing this, Heath literally ‘blew a fuse’: he suffered a pulmonary embolism.

 

A similar fate attended the demise of the late Roy (Lord) Jenkins who suffered a severe heart attack when confronted by intelligence officials with the fact that he was about to be exposed for his long-term treachery against the United Kingdom.

 

Roy Jenkins was one of the most lethal of all long-term German agents operating at the highest levels of the British Government.

 

And

-the present allegedly deeply compromised Tony Blair is the late Lord Jenkins’ protégé.

 

Heath, Rippon and Jenkins were far from being the only long-term. High-level foreign penetrations by the DVD-the successor ‘Black’ (continuing Nazi) intelligence organisation to the Abwehr.

 

In the United States, the Dulles brothers were German agents to this day. Substantial transfers of ‘Black’ Operations’ funds originally controlled by the United States authorities are known to have been transferred into the hands of the German ‘Black’ covert intelligence community. The CIA is belatedly being to some extent purged of operators with ethnic and other loyalties and ties to Germany.

 

TENSIONS

EXIST WITHIN INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES BECAUSE OF THIS PENETRATION

*

THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES.

 

Given that

 

(a)   The United Kingdom’s EEC Accession Treaty,

(b)   The Maastricht Treaty of 1992 and

(c)     The (aborted) European Constitution Treaty were among E.U. bilateral and collective Treaties that were procured by corrupt and fraudulent means,

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION IS AN ILLEGAL ORGANISATION.

 

This is because Article 49 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on Treaties, to which Britain and the other EU ‘Member States’ are parties, provides as follows:

‘If a State has been induced to conclude a Treaty by the fraudulent conduct of another negotiating State, that State may invoke the fraud as invalidating its consent to be bound by the Treaty.

[* The first tranche of corrupt payments for the European Constitution Treaty was paid out, but the fate of the second tranche, given the negative French and Dutch referenda outcomes, is uncertain - as well as being the subject of vicious secret controversy]

 

According to intelligence sources, earlier EU Collective treaties were likewise procured by fraudulent means.

 

In the British case, UK Membership of the European Union Collective -an illegal organisation which exists to subsume, usurp and collectivise national sovereignty under the enticing cover of ‘co-operation’ (code for collectivisation)-contravenes the 1689 Bill of Rights which remains the LAW of the United Kingdom to this day and which incorporates the following Oath:

 

‘I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority with this Realm’

*

WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION

 

In addition to exposing the illegality and illegitimacy of the European Union as a whole, International Currency Review [Volume 30, Number 4] demonstrates, with extensive analysis and documentation, that the European Commission is a criminal organisation.

 

The issue has been prepared in close collaboration with Ashley Mote, -Independent MEP for Southeast England, [www.ashleymote.co.uk] and Continental MEP colleagues. In October 2004, Mr Mote and Marta Andreason, the former Chief Accountant of the European Commission, presented the UK Serious Fraud Office with two large lever-arch files containing voluminous damning information about institutionalised corruption in the EU Commission and related EU structures.

 

NO ACTION WAS TAKEN

 

[Does the stink of corruption in high places prevent the Rule of Law from taking place?]

 

Among the reasons for concluding that the European Union is a criminal organisation, are the following:

 

1)         Because successive Presidents of the European Union preside over the disbursement of the corrupt ‘Black’ ‘facilitation fees’ identified, each successive (six-monthly) President is and has been aware of the corrupt mechanism used to procure the EU’s successive collective Treaties.

2)         The incidence of fraud committed within the EU’s structures is so extensive and routine, that the European Commission has been condemned as openly condoning a ‘culture of corruption’, and presiding over a system of ‘institutional looting’. Scandalised EC whistle blowing officials refer to the European Commission as a ‘festering dustbin of corruption’. In 2004, there were nearly 3,500 cases of EC fraud.

3)         When informed in 2004 that the EC Vice - President-designate, Jacques Barrot, had been convicted for embezzlement of funds, and had withheld this information from the European Commission’s President-designate, Sr. Jose-Manuel Barroso, the new President denied any prior knowledge of this fact, and left Barrot in place.

4)         It is nothing unusual for European Commission officials to be associated with lucrative corrupt ‘side businesses’-often using offshore accounts-from which they benefit financially, consequent upon contracts being awarded to the businesses in which they themselves have a secret pecuniary interest. For instance:

5)         The Sunday Telegraph reported on 25th September -2005 that two EC employees own a Brussels sex hotel, Studio Europe, which rents out rooms for 13 euros an hour. No doubt this location is used for blackmail purposes. The EC officials in question were named as Carmela lo Guidance, an assistant in the EC Budget Directorate-General and George Tizzies a porter in the Directorate-General responsible for employment. This is the latest of innumerable EC scandals to have erupted into the public domain, some of which are examined in the Special Issue [out on Monday 10th October 2005.]

6)         Unhealthy and evidently pervasive masonic links exist between European Commission officials and contractors, resulting in corrupt and unhealthy ‘business relationships’.

7)    The European Commission’s accounting is NOT only shambolic, but also fraudulent. Evidence to this effect is presented, inter alia, by the well-known British forensic accountant Christopher Arkell, FTCA, and by former Chief Accountant of the European Commission, Marta Andreason. She was ‘suspended’ after five months en poste, and then fired, after she questioned the legitimacy of payments that Directorates-General required her to authorise. She asked awkward questions, and was effectively told to ‘shut up and just sign’.

8)    The EC’s accounting irregularities, which are glaring, include the following abuses: When certain accounting modifications were implemented at the end of 2004, the closing balances in 2004 and the opening balances in 2005 were not reconciled- thereby permanently embedding false accounting data for the future. This means that henceforth no European Commission accounts can ever be accurate (not that this has ever been the case).

 

Even though EU ‘Member States’ have been making payments to the Commission for decades to cover the costs of pension liabilities for approximately 39,000 EC employees (as of 2005), the EU ‘Member States’ have simultaneously been charged with the liability of making/guaranteeing the resulting pension payments. Thus pension liabilities appear on both sides of the balance sheet. Proper accounting practice would require a charge to the Income and Expenditure Account of

 

EUR 19.5 billion

 

And a consequent reduction in reserves.

 

The European Commission should have been acquiring a liability for pensions throughout its existence instead of fudging the accounts in this fraudulent and irregular manner.

The European Commission ‘makes’ massive surpluses out of the ‘Member States’ annually, which it covers up

 

Surpluses are supposed according to the EU’s own regulations, to be returned to the ‘Member States’. What happens in practice is that the EC surpluses that have arisen after all accruals have been accounted for, are eliminated by the simple manipulative expedient of providing for potential expenditures not openly through the Income and Expenditure Account, but by means of corrupt adjustments to the Balance Sheet (‘Provisions’).

 

This method of accounting is prohibited by all recognised accounting standards around the world as DISHONEST.

 

Its use by the European Commission represents a clear fraud perpetuated upon ‘Member States’ and their troubled and exploited peoples.

 EC accounting records can be changed two or more years in arrears. The amount and the payee, but not the unique identifying number, can be altered, and no record whatsoever of such changes is/has been maintained in the records. This represents an open-ended invitation to scam the system, especially as it is routine for the EC’s Annual Accounts to be adjusted retrospectively.

 

The huge Eurocracy (or self-interested EU nomenklatura) has perfected subtle mechanisms for ensuring that hardly anything is ever done to stamp out the corruption over which it has presided for decades. These techniques include, but are not confined to the following:

 

 The use of ‘candour’,

 

which is NOT to be confused with the truth. ‘Candour’ is deployed in order to disarm, mislead, divert and mollify critics, so that any underlying fraud goes undetected.

 

The ‘multiple investigations’ technique

 

8.2) What happens is that several investigations are ‘opened’ separately. Further internal ‘investigations’ may follow. Some are then ‘closed’, or ‘suspended’, ostensibly ‘pending’ the ‘results’ of other investigations.

The resulting, deliberately contrived, confusion, with successive reports contradicting others, ensures that the corruption trail is buried and lost.

 

Report-writing is used to smother transparency, clarity, and TRUTH, with the sole objective of obfuscating the underlying looting and corruption.

 

8.3) The EC and its structures have at least 3,094 secret ‘working groups’ or committees, all of which are answerable to no-one, and the operations of which are secret.

 

8.4)             The main objective of any EC fraud investigation is to procure that the case is ‘exported’ as quickly as possible to the ‘Member States’ concerned, so that any corruption at the EC centre is consequently hidden from scrutiny.

8.5)             Wherever possible, investigations are kept unresolved until the existing Commission is duly replaced by its successor-when the ‘that was then, this is now’ excuse kicks in.

8.6)             Innumerable other deliberate obstruction methods, identified by International Currency Review with the guidance of Ashley Mote MEP and his colleagues, are routinely employed by the EC and related structures, to maximise the obfuscation of troubling problems.

 

For instance, one external corporation, based in Luxembourg, in which EC officials had an interest, was ostensibly established on 29th February 1989-a date which never even existed, which meant that the entity was ‘invisible’.

 

When a sanitised official report on the entity’s fraudulent activities was presented to the former President of the European Commission, Signor Romano Prodi - that allegedly corrupt Italian ‘machine’ politician- the date was altered to 22nd February 1989.

 

This further illustrated the devious standard European Commission technique of promulgating conflicting information in separate contradictory reports. By this means, controversy is deflected into sterile arguments over the conflicting information-diverting attention from the institutionalised internal looting itself.

 

8.7)             The European Court of Auditors has given an adverse opinion for many years, on 95% of all European Commission Expenditure.

It has never, ever, approved the EC’s accounts.

 

Furthermore evidence has surfaced of fraud in the Court’s own accounts -one of several indications that the Court itself cannot be trusted. Indeed, like the Commission’s own internal Audit Service, its main task, by open official admission, is to minimise embarrassment to the Commission.

 

The damning evidence of institutionalised European Commission looting and serial corruption covered up by the EC authorities contained in the single issue of International Currency Review is sufficient to induce a terminal crisis at the European Commission.

 

*

WHY BRITISH PAYMENTS TO THE EC MUST CEASE FORTHWITH.

 

Both Ashley Mote MEP and the journal’s Editor, Christopher Story, demand that the UK Treasury sits up, finally takes notice, and withholds further contributions to the EC budget pending elimination of institutionalised corruption and looting in the European Commission’s structures -which will never happen.

 

In a letter to Ashley Mote dated 22nd October 2004, Stephen Timms, the Treasury Minister, told the MEP that withholding British payments to the EC would be illegal and would be an ‘option’ we would not consider’

 

BUT

 

Continued squandering of UK Taxpayers (OUR MONEY) represents a dereliction by British Ministers and their officials, of their duty of care towards UK taxpayer’s funds.

Given the conspicuous gravity of the situation, Ministers are believed to be increasing the risk of being sued for negligence as exposures of the European Commission’s ‘culture of corruption’ proliferate.

 

[At this moment in Time in the UK millions of people on tax-credits who were overpaid because of technical problems are being asked to hand the money back. They should ALL insist that the Treasury should try the European Commission and ask their employees to point the finger and explain were the billions of pounds of OUR money is resting in banks in Switzerland. WE should certainly have a great deal of compound interest to collect at the same time]

 

Moreover the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Lawson of Blaby, has advised the House of Lords’ European Committee that the British Government DOES possess the legal scope to give itself powers to withhold payments to the European Commission.

 

He told the Committee:

 

‘You have to remember how hard it was to win the (UK) rebate…It would never have happened if we had not made clear that if we did not get satisfaction, we would withhold our contributions.

It was never published, but it was printed. It was discreetly known to those who we negotiated with, that this is what would happen if we did not get satisfaction….Without that threat to withhold our contributions, to the extent of having the UK law officers produce a bill, we would have NOT got [the Rebate].’

 

[Source: Future Financing of the European Union, House of Lords European Committee, HL Paper 62, 9th March 2005.]

 

But since Britain’s EU membership is illegal, because the UK Accession Treaty and successive EU Collective Treaties (notably Maastricht) were procured by fraud, it is not even technically necessary for the Government to extract that draft bill from the official pigeon-hole into which it was shoved.

*

BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION TOMORROW: NO PROBLEM.

 

The Government can walk away from the European Union Tomorrow- and use the 25% of gross Domestic Product represented by all current and future costs of the EU membership:

 

To rebuild the Public Transportation system.

 

Build spanking new ‘Schools and Hospitals’ wherever demand exists.

 

And revitalise the BRITISH economy generally.

 

All without suffering any losses since EU membership has brought Britain no clear benefits at all, that could not have been procured domestically. It has however, meant that billions of UK taxpayers’ funds that the British Government should have been spending at home, have been squandered on this sterile, decaying collectivist project, led by corrupted and blackmailed politicians and operatives.

 

All EU ‘Member States’, valuing the huge British market for their goods, would be compelled to negotiate arms’-length bilateral trade and other agreements with the United Kingdom, or risk losing access to UK markets. Any prospective interim disruptions could be accommodated by the British Government directing the UK taxpayers’ funds that it normally squanders with the EC’s ‘festering dustbin of corruption’, into temporarily vulnerable sectors of the UK economy.

 

A Free Trade Agreement linking Britain, the United States and Canada has bee readied, for implementation when Britain leaves the European Community.

 

For, contrary to what is in the public domain, contingency plans do exist in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union.

 

These were recently reviewed and ‘dusted down’, in the context of key connections made by certain intelligence circles following the 7/7 attacks, which have shown that EU Member States’ that profess to be allies of the United Kingdom are anything but.

 

Exposure information for this special issue of International Currency Review

[Vol.30, No4] has been developed with the generous practical assistance of Ashley Mote MEP. Paul van Buitenen MEP, Marta Andreason, Christopher Arkle FTCA and the US and UK intelligence sources special to the Editor, Christopher Story.

 

For further details, see Ashley Mote’s website: www.ashleymote.co.uk.

 

 

International Currency Review, VOL. 30 NO 4 [extracts from 153 pages -shown above], available by subscription from www.worldreports.org. was mailed to paying subscribers worldwide on

 

10th October 2005

 

Banks, Corporations and other entities that use subscription agencies may subscribe to World Reports Ltd serials (complete) through their usual channels, or else direct from our website, or from the London or New York addresses shown in the lower red panel on the

 

www.worldreports.org Home Page. The website has a secure and reliable subscription ordering system.

 

ABOUT INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

 

International Currency Review is the only INDEPENDENT global journal specialising in international currency, financial and economic issues with a geopolitical and intelligence dimension.

 

Published since 1969, it specialises today in exposing corruption in governance structures, since the corruption of governance and of the capitalist system is swamping all other considerations.

 

The Journal is one of a series of intelligence sources published by World Reports, details of which will be found on our website:

 

www.worldreports.org

 

International Currency Review has recently exposed the basis of the ‘Upper Echelon’global financial structure, which sustains the ‘Lower Echelon’ structure with which we are all familiar.

 

The ‘Upper Echelon’ is a ‘closed’ intergovernmental and intelligence financial environment characterised by high -yield investment programmes, scamming operations and colossal stored fiat wealth running into trillions of dollars

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

* * *

OCTOBER 10-2005

Also

 

AVAILABLE SOON

 

THE NEW UNDERWORLD ORDER

 

*Published by: EDWARD HARLE LTD

(Source of ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books.

108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, LONDON SW1P 2EF

Orders@edwardharle.com . Tel-Orderline +44 [0207-222-2635

OCTOBER-2005

*

[AFTER MANY YEARS  RELENTLESSLY REVEALING THE CORRUPTION IN THE EU AND ELSEWHERE CHRISTOPHER STORY SUCCUMBED TO ILLNESS AND DIED IN 2010.IT IS CONSIDERED THAT HE WAS IN FACT ASSASSINATED BECAUSE OF HIS UNFAILING RESOLVE to seek out THE TRUTH!]

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE-ENEMY OF

 ITS MEMBER STATES

 BY CHRISTOPHER STORY -


THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE-ENEMY OF ITS MEMBER STATES BY

CHRISTOPHER STORY

-PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

 

Christopher Story Assassination (Edward Harle working under the ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6A_VpB2u_o25 Apr 2011 - 15 min - Uploaded by usellcom
 

Prominent veteran financial journalist Edward Harle (working under the pen name

Christopher Story...

 

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

H.F.1376

 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
DAILY MAIL
COMMENT
BRITISH PASSPORTS PRODUCED BY A BRITISH FIRM

ONE miniutes thought.That's all it would have taken anyone with an ounce of common sense-let alone patriotic feeling-to understand the offensiveness of giving this contract to a foreign firm. We urge readers to sign our petition  [below or online].

WITH YOUR HELP WE CAN GET THIS TERRIBLE DECISIN REVERSED
 

NOW HAVE YOUR VOICE HEARD-SIGN OUR PETITION TO HAVE OUR BRITISH PASSPORTS  MADE IN THE UK.

1. First log on to our petition webpage by typing

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/passports

You will be asked to give your first and last names.

Tell your friends and colleagues to join the campaign by sharing the link to our petition online.

Keep logging back into our website to keep an eye on the tally-and see how many people feel as strongly as you about making our new blue passports

AT HOME.

2. OR POST THE COUPON

 

I believe that the contract for the UK's new blue passport should be awarded to a British Firm

Name:

Address:

 

Post to: Passports Petition, Daily Mail, 2 Derry Street, London, W8 5TT.

 

 

 

 

    Sign our petition to have the new blue passports made in Britain ...

    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/.../Sign-petition-new-blue-passports-Britain.html
    16 hours ago ... Sign our petition to have the new blue passports made in Britain: Fury in the
    House of Lords after Amber Rudd is accused of betraying Brexit by handing ... By
    John Stevens, Deputy Political Editor For The Daily Mail .... Now you can have
    your voice heard - sign our petition to have passports made in the UK.

     

    Theresa May defends decision to allow Franco-Dutch firm to make ...

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/.../theresa-may-defends-decision-allow-franco-dutch-firm-make-britains/
    1 day ago ... Theresa May has defended the decision to allow a Franco-Dutch firm to make Britain's new blue passports after Brexit as ministers said that the UK must be a "strong proponent of global free trade".
    The Home Office is facing a legal challenge from the British firm which currently ...

     
 

 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN

WHAT DID YOU EXPECT WITH A GOVERNMENT RUN BY A

 REMAINER

and closet EU freiendly retainers.

-IT IS THE NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN QUESTION RAISING IT'S HEAD - YET AGAIN!]

*  *  *

Saturday, March 24,2018

 

'Be just and fear not; let all the ends thou aimest at , be thy country's, thy God's and truth's.'

Shakespeare.

'Let our object be our country, our whole country, and nothing but our country'-

Daniel Webster

'Of the whole sum of human life no small part is that which consists of a man's relations to his country, and his feelings concerning it,-

Gladstone

H.F.1510-COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY.

 

HEALTH SLOTT

 
 

ARE PILLS KILLING YOU?

 

 

 

Are pills killing us? Few know that GPs are paid extra to ... - Daily Mail

 

 

View
comments

 

A few years ago, Roger Andrews, a man in his early 70s, wrote to me to tell me what had happened to him when he flew abroad for his son’s wedding.

During the journey, he required a wheelchair. Indeed, Roger’s health had been poor since he had been successfully operated on for a heart problem.

Yet on the way home, he felt better than he had in years, even managing to walk unaided through Heathrow airport.

A miracle? Not exactly. The crucial difference was that he was no longer on the cholesterol-lowering statins that he’d been taking since his operation. He’d forgotten to pack them.

Soon after publishing Roger’s letter in my weekly medical column, thousands more poured in with similar tales.

Typical was one from a woman in her 60s who said she’d always been extremely active — skiing, Scottish country dancing, climbing Lakeland fells — until a routine check by her GP revealed she had mildly raised blood pressure.

So he started her on diuretic tablets, once a day. Soon, the woman started feeling light-headed and generally unwell.

 

The number of prescriptions in Britain has tripled in the past 15 years

Could that be down to the pills? The GP shrugged off her concerns, warning her that she might have a stroke if she ditched them.

‘Then I started getting muscle cramps in my legs,’ she recalled, ‘and spent a fortune on private sports clinics. After 18 months, the pain spread to my back.’

Within a few more years, she could hardly climb stairs, never mind a mountain. Back she went to the GP.

‘His only response was to say that I’d had 68 active years and should find something less active to do.’

Fortunately, she took matters into her own hands. She bought a blood pressure monitor, and started taking measurements at different times of the day.

The readings went up and down, depending on how busy or stressed she was at the time, but rarely registered above normal. Why, she wondered, was she being treated for high blood pressure at all?

By then, she’d been on the pills for eight years — during which she’d been in pain, generally feeling unwell and all but housebound.

So she simply stopped taking them. ‘Within a fortnight, my activities returned to normal and I can once again climb the fells.’

A bizarre one-off case? Sadly not. As a GP who has a weekly newspaper column, I’ve received thousands of similar letters over the last ten years.

Most describe the misery of suffering from aches and pains, lethargy, insomnia, impaired concentration, gut disturbances and general decrepitude — and their almost miraculous recovery on discontinuing their drugs.

Worse, many — like the fell-walker — were being treated for conditions they didn’t actually have.

Take this man from Edinburgh, a cyclist and regular hill walker, who was told that his cholesterol was high and he needed to take statins.

‘Over the next few months, I became very concerned as my stamina was disappearing,’ he says. ‘I gave up my weekly ride with the cycle club as I could no longer keep up.

 

The driving force behind the increase in the number of prescriptions is the widening of the scope of those deemed eligible for treatment

‘I explained this to my GP and asked, “Is there any possibility that the drugs I am on are responsible?” She said, “No.”

‘I then got severe cramps in my neck every night at about 1am. Each morning I felt like I had been half-strangled.’

After learning from an internet search that statins could cause muscle cramps, he decided to stop taking them.

‘Bingo, no cramps. I had a GP check-up arranged for three weeks later and, having had no more cramps, told her that I wouldn’t be taking the statins again.

She said, ‘Never mind, your cholesterol was not very high anyway.’ ”

These striking accounts are powerful testimony to a vast and hidden epidemic. Put simply: we’re taking too many pills.

It’s all part of the progressive ‘medicalisation’ of people’s lives to no good purpose.

You’ve probably experienced something similar: unnecessary tests, over-treatment of minor symptoms, inappropriate use of life-sustaining technologies, and a constant stream of —often contradictory — warnings about trivial threats to health.

The mass prescribing of drugs, however, is far more worrying, because it poses a substantial threat to our health and wellbeing. And it’s now spiralling out of control.

In just 15 years, the number of prescriptions issued by GPs in Britain has tripled.

The driving force behind this is the widening of the scope of those deemed eligible for treatment.

No one disputes that someone like me, diagnosed a few years ago with alarmingly high blood pressure, should take regular medication to lower it. In fact, there’s no more certain way of improving my chances of living as long as possible.

In the last few years, however, doctors have turned to treating millions of people like the fell-walker and the cyclist. People whose blood pressure, cholesterol or blood sugar levels are only modestly elevated.

This has led to a truly astonishing seven-fold increase in the numbers of prescriptions for blood pressure-lowering drugs, a five-fold rise in diabetic medication and a 20-fold increase in statins.

Yet there’s probably very little wrong with these patients — or nothing that a better diet and exercise won’t fix.

 

Statins are typically prescribed to people with high cholesterol but have seen a dramatic increase in prescriptions to people 

So why were they prescribed the drugs in the first place?

A chief reason is that blood pressure, cholesterol and sugar levels are variable. They fluctuate over time in response to different circumstances.

Ups and downs of everyday life can increase blood pressure, as may a visit to the doctor. It often returns to normal in the same day.

These variables also rise with age, so a ‘raised’ blood pressure or cholesterol measurement for someone in their 30s becomes ‘average’ for a person in their 70s. And if you’re overweight, your measurement may be higher than average — yet sink back to normal once you lose weight.

Here’s a typical scenario.

A 65-year-old retired lawyer assured me that he’d always enjoyed good health and never taken any medication. Until, that is, he went in for a flu jab and was persuaded by a nurse to have a ‘well man check-up’.

‘I was weighed and measured and gave various samples for testing,’ he said.

‘And then the triumphant, “Aha! Gotcha!” was uttered when my blood pressure was taken and found to be raised.

‘The doctor told me I would be on a regime of several pills to control my blood pressure for the rest of my life.

‘I was now a patient — eternally dependent upon medication.’

Gotcha, indeed. Just one unnecessary pill can turn your life into a misery. And the more prescription drugs you take regularly, the more likely you are to experience harmful side-effects.

Unfortunately, most GPs are too busy to inquire closely about them, unless you raise them yourself. Nor are they likely to initiate a proper discussion about whether a drug for high blood pressure, say, will seriously improve your chances of avoiding serious illness.

If they did, they might tell you about a major trial, organised by the Medical Research Council, which looked at the benefit of giving drugs to people with mildly raised blood pressure. Scientists found that medication reduced the chances of having a stroke by just 1.2 per cent.

If doctors put it that way, they’d soon have fewer takers for their magic pills.

A man on 13 different types of medication told me: ‘Most of the doctors agree I am taking too many pills, but no one suggests stopping any of them.’

He described the classic symptoms of illness caused by taking too many drugs: ‘I have pain in my joints and muscle weakness as well as extreme lethargy.

‘I also feel cold even when the sun is shining or the heating is on in the house. I am tired just walking a short distance and rarely leave the house except for medical appointments.

‘I tend to fall asleep when I sit down to watch the TV. My hands recently started to shake and I find it difficult to lift anything heavier than half a bag of shopping.’

A year ago, this man was mowing the lawn, swimming, playing tennis and attending a weekly exercise class. Yet no doctor was prepared to take the responsibility of reducing his gargantuan intake of pills. Instead, they just kept on prescribing.

This widespread practice is far more dangerous than you’d think.

In recent years, there’s been an astonishing 75 per cent increase in the numbers requiring emergency hospital admission for adverse drug reactions.

In fact, they’re currently responsible for one in ten acute admissions to hospital.

It’s not as if doctors aren’t aware of the dangers of over-prescribing.

In 1979, Derbyshire family doctor Cedrick Martys wanted to discover how many of his patients were experiencing harmful side-effects.

Over two years, he asked everyone taking a drug for the first time to fill in a questionnaire about any new symptoms since starting treatment.

 

High blood pressure often sees pills prescribed to help treat the condition 

This was scarcely rocket science, but Dr Martys’s findings were astounding. Some 40 per cent of patients reported symptoms — nausea, dizziness, fatigue and so on — that could ‘certainly’ or ‘probably’ be attributed to the drug he’d prescribed.

Nearly 40 years on from his study, the rise in prescribing suggests there must be vastly more people with drug-induced symptoms.

But here’s the real scandal: no one knows. There’s no formal means of monitoring how many patients are suffering, let alone how many might be dying.

‘The number of patients seriously injured or killed by drug-induced disease is vast,’ observes one of the contributors to the standard textbook on treatment-induced diseases. ‘The range of illnesses is so wide that no solution to this problem seems likely to emerge.’

Almost certainly, over-prescribing is a contributory factor to the recent decline in life expectancy in the UK.

Throughout the 20th century, excepting the havoc caused by two world wars, life expectancy increased almost year by year, attributed variously to social factors (such as better housing and nutrition) and medical progress.

Between 2000 and 2012, it increased by a further three years in Britain but then plateaued. After that, the trend reversed, with a rising mortality rate in the older age groups.

Put simply, far more people were dying than expected: an additional 600 a week in 2015, compared with the previous year. The same phenomenon was occurring in other Western European countries and the U.S.

Several commentators and academics have attributed this to ‘austerity’ — the cuts in social spending that followed the 2008 financial crisis. But this could scarcely account for the consistency of the trend.

A far more plausible explanation is the huge rise over the previous decade in prescribing drugs.

Consider, for instance, physician Dr Ian Scott’s account of witnessing a recovery from what would otherwise have been a fatal drug-induced illness.

A woman in her 90s was admitted to hospital with dangerously low blood pressure and acute kidney failure. Both conditions had been caused by the three different types of blood pressure-lowering drugs she was taking.

Once her medication was discontinued, she made a full recovery and returned home without any further prescriptions.

She was extremely lucky. A hospital doctor had saved her life by stopping the drugs — though the thought had clearly never occurred to her GP.

So who’s to blame for the scandal of mass medication?

As you might expect, the big pharmaceutical companies are by no means innocent.

By the late Seventies, most of the major drugs had already been discovered, and they were worried about their falling profits.

That’s when the biggest, Merck, thought: why not expand its market beyond the sick and target the healthy? It would then be able to sell to everyone, in the same way that Wrigley’s marketed its chewing gum.

The most obvious way to achieve this was to redesignate previously ‘normal’ conditions — like slightly raised blood pressure or cholesterol — as ‘abnormal’. But first it had to persuade doctors and the wider public, as any benefits were likely to be small.

Merck did this by paying millions for massive clinical trials, involving thousands of patients and stretching over several years. Then, using subterfuge and sleight of hand, it acted as judge and jury of its own drugs.

Result? Merck successfully portrayed its pills as vastly more effective than they really are.

Epidemiologists — who use statistical methods to assess the benefits of treatments — must also take their share of the blame.

Thirty years ago, a prominent British epidemiologist, Professor Geoffrey Rose, came to the startling conclusion that it’s not just individuals who get ill. ‘The population is sick,’ he announced.

His theory was that the blood pressure, cholesterol and glucose levels in the population are on average ‘too high’. Therefore it’s better to lower these measurements in millions of people than just to focus on the few who have markedly elevated scores.

Professor Rose extended his theory to drinking. If millions of moderate drinkers drank, say, one glass fewer a day, he said, the problems associated with alcoholism would be more readily prevented.

How? Because this would theoretically reduce the population’s average consumption of alcohol.

But you don’t need to be a professor to see that the population approach is nonsense. How could my drinking one glass of wine less a day conceivably influence the burden of alcoholism on society?

For all that, Rose’s contention that the ‘population is sick’ and ‘the majority must change to help the minority’ remains a central principle of medical thinking.

It’s even encouraged experts to reduce the cut-off point of what doctors define as high blood pressure — thus condemning millions to take drugs they are unlikely to need.

But there’s a third reason behind the huge increase in prescriptions, and it’s the most important of all.

The culprits, I’m sad to say, are my fellow GPs, who in 2004 did a Faustian deal with the Blair government.

For the first time, NHS doctors agreed to being ‘paid for performance’. This amounted to financial incentives to increase the number of patients being treated for specific conditions, including high blood pressure, cholesterol and sugar in the blood.

No longer would doctors necessarily be driven by concern for a patient’s welfare. They now also had to think about maximising their income.

And so was born the Quality And Outcome Framework, which set targets with rewards of oodles of extra cash attached. GPs were expected to score about 500 points out of a maximum of 1,050.

 

So the population was not ‘sick’ after all. But it has been made ‘sick’ by the consequences of over-prescribing — resulting almost certainly in many shortened lives

The scheme’s main selling point was that the mortality rate was bound to tumble, with an extra 30,000 lives a year saved. Furthermore, there’d be fewer hospital admissions and fewer ‘health inequalities’ between the rich and the poor (who tend to have more serious health conditions).

So, by paying doctors for their ‘performance’, every one would be healthier. In theory. But even in 2004, at the start of the experiment, there were dissenters.

‘I am increasingly dismayed by the role that has been thrust upon us,’ said Dougal Jeffries, a GP in the Scilly Isles. ‘It involves ruthlessly pursuing people who feel perfectly well, where the finding of any one of a multitude of minor variations can lead to a lifetime of medication, repeated blood tests and other investigations.

‘I prefer seeing patients who are actually ill, rather than those whom epidemiologists and pharmaceutical companies believe to be in need of drug treatment.’

Still, most GPs were in favour. After all, their earnings were rising by 50 per cent — to £113,614 a year for a partner.

Nevertheless, there was an essential problem. The scheme kept increasing the number of targets they had to hit — and that gave GPs less opportunity to exercise their professional judgment on what might be appropriate for a patient.

There are, for instance, any number of things a family doctor may wish to discuss with a 92-year-old woman — both medical (how are the knees?) and more general (how are the grandchildren?).

But, the moment the GP turns to his computer screen, a third voice will intrude with a reminder to test her cholesterol level or tell her why she needs to take cholesterol-lowering statins.

After all, he won’t earn any money from inquiring after the knees or the grandchildren, or taking a detailed history to make sense of some puzzling symptom, or indeed any of the traditional skills of family doctoring — all of which can take time.

Or let’s consider another middle-aged patient who’s a bit overweight. The GP has just taken her blood pressure, which is slightly raised at 160/100.

He has options. He could ensure it really is elevated by taking it several times.

And, if it is, he could discuss ‘lifestyle changes’ such as losing a few pounds and taking more exercise, which may help bring it down — and arrange to review the situation in a couple of months.

If the GP is to maximise his income, however, it’s much more sensible to start the patient on the pills immediately. These are guaranteed to bring her blood pressure down and take him one step nearer to his target

Thus good doctors end up practising bad medicine. So what did the public make of all this? Nothing — because the overwhelming majority had no idea what was going on.

There were no notices or leaflets in the surgery informing them of radical changes in their doctors’ contractual arrangements. Indeed, not one of those interviewed in a patient survey in 2012 — eight years after the introduction of the scheme — were aware of the radical change in GPs’ methods of remuneration. Once informed, most thought it ‘inappropriate’.

‘I didn’t realise that they got an extra payment for taking somebody’s blood pressure — good heavens,’ was a typical response. ‘Personally, I think it’s wrong. Doctors should deliver [a high] quality of care because it’s the professional thing to do.’

Inevitably, the pursuit of targets has redefined doctors’ relationships with their patients.

They have now become, as one GP said bluntly, ‘walking bags of money’.

It’s now nearly 15 years since the targets were introduced, and they’ve been disastrous.

First, thousands of patients are now being over-treated with drugs.

Second, there’s a mismatch of priorities. The patient wants a particular problem sorted out, while the doctor has to persuade her to have tests and thus achieve his targets.

Third, the system potentially discourages doctors from engaging with their patients as individuals, and having open discussions about the modest benefits of medication.

But surely the scheme has reduced the toll of strokes and heart disease and improved the care of those with, for example, diabetes? Sadly, not.

Referrals and admissions to hospitals haven’t fallen either. They’ve continued to rise at a rate of 5 per cent per year, though those for heart disease have been slightly lower.

The discrepancy in health between the better and less well-off? Hitting targets has made no difference at all. And the prospect of saving 30,000 lives a year has also proved to be a mirage.

Yet the total cost of the scheme over the past 15 years is around £25–£30 billion — £15 billion in direct payments to GPs and a similar sum for the drugs. Money that could have been spent on building 1,000 brand-new hospitals, or providing free residential care to all with dementia.

In other words, the most expensive experiment in the history of medicine has failed.

So the population was not ‘sick’ after all. But it has been made ‘sick’ by the consequences of over-prescribing — resulting almost certainly in many shortened lives.

  • Adapted from Too Many Pills: How Too Much Medicine Is Endangering Our Health And What We Can Do About It by James Le Fanu, published by Little, Brown on May 24 at £13.99. To order a copy for £10.49 (valid to May 19) visit www.mailshop.co.uk/books or call 0844 571 0640. P&P is free on orders over £15.

 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5719731/Doctor-says-doling-pills-explain-fall-life-expectancy.html#ixzz5FI9sR6C1
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

 

H.F.1549 - HEALTH SLOT

 

H.F.1549

 

 

 

His illustrious forebear defeated the French at Waterloo - but this Duke of Wellington led a Lords

 attack on

 Brexit:

QUENTIN LETTS on why this House looks ripe for the abattoir

 

e-mail

 

comments

 

There was once a time when the Duke of Wellington was a title to inspire feelings of the most purple British pride. 

The first duke was a tremendous thumper of the French, the victor of Waterloo, later prime minister, a man of Albion beyond question. His bootship. Great man.

But yesterday one of his successors, the ninth duke, markedly less martial, led another of the House of Lords' pinprick rebellions against the Government on Brexit

This latest one was on the date, in law, under which we will leave the EU.

At present that date is March 29, 2019. Some of us are already preparing tremendous booze-ups for the day. But not this damn duke. He wanted the date removed from the statute books.

He hated the idea of such certitude. How vulgar it was. 'A straitjacket.' 

 

The ninth Duke of Wellington (pictured) led another of the House of Lords' pinprick rebellions against the Government on Brexit

Couldn't see the point of the thing. And so he helped bring about another defeat for Theresa May and her ministers. And us.

 

 

Let us put to one side for a moment, with the air of a clubman keeping his juiciest bites of sausage to the end of his dinner, the persona of the duke himself.

What of the Lords? What of the pro-EU gang who have been using the Upper Chamber as their vehicle in recent days?

 

Yesterday the Chamber was not particularly full. The usual suspects were there – those who spoke on the duke's little rebellion included that interminable Euro-groupie and former diplomat Lord Hannay, and his fellow crossbencher Lord Butler, once cabinet secretary. 

There may have been many more who voted when the House divided, but the actual debate was under-attended.

Most peers know where they stand on Brexit, and it is not on the side of the majority who voted in the 2016 referendum. 

They were elsewhere on the parliamentary estate yesterday. I bet the bars were doing brisk business. 

 

He helped bring about another defeat for Theresa May (pictured) and her ministers. And us

And so we come to the Duke of Wellington, nominally a follower of the Tory Whip but, on this issue, happy to ignore his political affiliation in favour of his apparently stronger loyalty to the European Elite Party.

I merely note that his duchess, Antonia, is a Princess of Prussia. He himself, Charles Valerian Wellesley OBE, DL, with more titles than a champion boxer, after schooling at Eton, has had a business career, home and abroad.

He is a member of Portugal's Order of Merit and he holds the Grand Cross of the Spanish Order of Isobel the Catholic. Ole!

 

 

The first Duke of Wellington (pictured) was a tremendous thumper of the French, the victor of Waterloo, later prime minister 

 

 

Where once his illustrious forebear wore battle colours and carried a riding crop, this silk-suited patrician, purring in a voice that was pure gin and French, put it to their lordships that he was merely 'trying to help the Government and not in any way to thwart' Brexit. Noo noo, of course not. Dear heart, the thought never crossed our minds.

He argued simply that it was a frightful bind for ministers to have to work with the burden of this set date for our departure. How much more they could achieve if that date were not there!

Lord Butler, from what I could understand, sought to suggest that dropping the date might actually allow Brexit to be delayed for ever, but the duke did not want to pursue that idea.

Eurosceptic opposition came from Lord Grocott, a Labour peer who has had to put up with some pretty bad heckling in recent months (his party colleagues at the far end of the Palace of Westminster hate him for siding with the voters).

He recalled Parkinson's Law, which states that 'work expands to fill the time available' and he suspected that the Europhiles were merely attempting to hold up Brexit.

 His voice went unheeded and the duke's dismal little delay was approved by a House that, with every day, looks riper for the abattoir.

Does this sort of thing help the Remainers? To have an hereditary peer, one of the most blue of all blue-bloods, helping their cause? I suspect not.

 


Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5706761/QUENTIN-LETTS-sees-Lords-pro-EU-gang-bring-defeat.html#ixzz5GQ72xk6e
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

H.F.1548

 

SO WILL BRITAIN ONE DAY BE  MUSLIM?

by

Ruth Dudley Edwards

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

*

Our failure to have children.

Welfarism.

Political Correctness.

And a

LACK of WILL

 to fight Islamic extremism

 

 

 

THIS WEEK has been another terrible one for those of us who want a society in which all races, religions and cultures mix to their mutual advantage and

ENRICHMENT.

On Tuesday, five men were sentenced to life in prison for plotting to use a huge fertiliser bomb in what would have been the UK's largest mass murder.

Omar Khyam, Salahuddin Amin, Anthony Garciaand Jawa Akbar -first and second generation immigrants - responded to the tolerance of the British people

BY TRYING TO KILL AS MANY OF THEM AS POSSIBLE.

It is absurd to hope that the exposure of their evil after a 13-month trial which cost an estimated

£50,000,000

-has finally provided the wake-up call that this slumbering country so badly needs?

I'm one of those old-fashioned immigrants to this country who feels passionately grateful, is proudly British (as well as Irish -having been born in Dublin) and believes that immigrants have more duties than rights. And further, that one of those is to adjust to British society rather than expecting it to adjust to them. [ has been the practice for some decades but more so during the Blair years.]

However, one aspect of contemporary British society which I refuse to adjust to is its weakness in the face of the

ENEMY WITHIN

In my many conversations with like-minded people about the threat that radical Islam poses to the

 BRITISH WAY OF LIFE

-And indeed, to European civilisation -we frequently end by despairingly agreeing that the

WEST

-seems intention committing

POLITICAL and CULTURAL

SUICIDE.

When we look starkly at the demographic statistics, the wimpishness of our

ESTABLISHMENT

-in the face of the

THREAT

-the perversions perpetuated by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-and our passivity, it's hard to avoid the

CONCLUSION

-that within a couple of generations

ISLAM

-will be in

CONTROL of EUROPE

And before anyone says that there nothing wrong if this happened, since the vast majority of

MUSLIMS

are tolerant people who would not dream of interfering with

OUR WAY OF LIFE

-it's necessary  to point out that in

MUSLIM COUNTRIES

, it's usually the radicals and extremists

MULLAHS

-who regard

TOLERANCE

AS A VICE

-WHO MAKE THE RUNNING.

This occurs too in microcosm in

MUSLIM GHETTOS

around

EUROPE

We saw the frightening fundamentalist fringe of

ISLAM

-marching, threatening and perpetuating violence over the cartoons depicting

MOHAMMAD

IN

DENMARK

while the majority of Muslims - who, yes, of course are tolerant and decent - kept their mouths shut and stayed at

HOME

YES, Islam may be a great religion. BUT

-in its fundamentalist version, some of its values are antipathetic to ours, and if they triumph in

EUROPE 

-they will

THREATEN OUR VALUES

such as

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

and

SPEECH

and the spirit of intellectual inquiry that made

EUROPEAN CIVILISATION

Great and Prosperous

 

The danger of ending up like these poor, despotic and medieval

Islamic States

-in which millions live miserably is the prospect that

CHRISTIANS

HINDUS

MODERATE MUSLIMS and NON-BELIEVERS -should be uniting

TO PREVENT

 

BUT THE TRUTH IS WE ARE DOING LITTLE TO STOP IT.

Consider first a few chilling statistics.

EUROPEANS ARE FAILING TO REPRODUCE

[Yet in our own island millions of potential citizens have been 

SLAUGHTERED AT BIRTH

thanks to David Steels -Abortion Bill of 1965?

It is still taking place in 2007 though there is NOW an  growing awareness of the tragedy to the potential mother and to society in general that many more doctors today are refusing to condone the

MURDER.

Recently the sight of full grown foetuses being deprived of their lives has now brought the horror and injustice of the action to destroy life.

In an age of contraception of many devices and anti-life pills it is unbelievable that any potential mother was unable to take the necessary steps to prevent conception.

David Steels Bill was to prevent back-street abortions and he himself a few ears ago voiced his concern as to what has happened over the years since.]

*

Consider  first a few chilling statistics.

Europeans are failing to reproduce. Just to keep the population steady, you need 2.1 births per women

[This is a case for Government action by offering cash and other vital services to enable the reluctant mother to do her best for her community and country.]

However in 2005, the European average was 1.38.

In Ireland it was 1.9

France it was 1.89

Germany 1.35

Italy 1.23

Britain scored in the middle of this range with 1.6

BUT

That was because - like France - we have a large

MUSLIM POPULATION

with a high birth rate. Indeed,

MUSLIMS

are out breeding

 non-Muslims

through out

 EUROPE

 

 

[Many of whom have absolutely no intention of integrating -

Thank you very much Mr Blair -we don't think so.]

'Just look at the development within Europe.'

said a triumphant Norwegian Imam a few months ago

'where the number of

MUSLIMS

is expanding like mosquitoes.

Every Western women in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim women in the same countries is producing an average of 3.5 children.

'OUR WAY OF THINKING WILL PROVE MORE POWERFUL THAN YOURS' he said.

The big question this poses is:

WHY ARE WE NOT REPRODUCING?

There are many reasons, but probably the most important are the decline of religion and the liberation of women.

[The populations which have the stronger religious stance will be the eventual rulers of Europe. It can be a Christian Europe or a Muslim Europe. The Governments of Europe and the shrinking United Kingdom have to decide.]

In Ireland, when the Roman Catholic Church effectively ran society, sex for procreation, contraceptives were banned, the normal size for a family was around five or six children, bur 12 or 13 were not uncommon.

As the country embraced secularism in the 1980s, birth rates plummeted, exacerbated by the new -found confidence of women that made them choose careers rather than domesticity.

WHEREAS in the 1970s, I was regarded in both the UK and Ireland as odd for being married but voluntarily childless, these days, childlessness |

IS A COMMON CHOICE

It is a world where one-child families abound and to have more than two children is to be regarded as eccentric and probably environmentally irresponsible.

Moreover, the erosion of family life and the long - hours culture place a heavy burden on those prepared to rear the next generation.

Despite these social forces, even in the UK, devote Muslims and Orthodox Jews obey instructions to have large families.

Confronted with this demographic revolution and official statistics which showed there were too few young people to support an ageing population, European governments decided to embrace

IMMIGRATION

-as an inherent good without any thought for the consequences.

As a result, politicians and businessmen assured us that we had to have economic growth in n order to prop up ever greater public spending and that it could be provided only by importing large numbers of workers from abroad

BUT WHY WASN'T THERE A NATIONAL DEBATE

ABOUT

Whether it was wise to mortgage our cultural future for the sake of a mess of financial pottage?

[A recent report on the cost  and benefit of large scale

IMMIGRATION

estimated that the country benefited by

ONLY - 50p

 for each migrant]

Where were the politicians arguing against the doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow

ILLEGITIMATE

Who among the liberal elite's commentariat were challenging the moral relativism that flew in the face of

SENSE and SENSIBILITY

-by insisting that the culture of

Shakespeare

The King James Bible

Keats's poetry

Turner's paintings

and

Elgar's music

-was no more important than - the cultures of other

IMPORTED MINORITIES?

 

We know the answer all too well.

Cries of racism drowned out rational argument - not just here but throughout

OLD EUROPE

As one gloomster put it:

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which is thought what

SENTIMENTALITY is to COMPASSION

-means that the intelligentsia of the

WEST

-has disarmed itself in advance of any possible struggle.

The result of all this, as recent events have made tragically clear, was that

BRITISH CULTURE

-was

UNDERMINED and SOCIAL COHESION

DAMAGED.

Separated from mainstream society by geographical and cultural apartheid, which has been fostered by

MULTICULTURALISM

-many immigrants were denied the chance to

INTEGRATE.

 

AND, INSTEAD OF BEING TOLD BY THE HOST COMMUNITY

THAT IF THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ADHERE

-to the values of a liberal, pluralist democracy, they should

RETURN HOME

They were asked how they would like

BRITAIN

-to conform to

THEIR VALUES.

THE STORY WAS VERY MUCH THE SAME THROUGHOUT EUROPE

The robust American political commentator Mark Steyn, a disillusioned Anglophile has already written us off. The thesis of his Blackly comic book,

*

America Alone:

The End Of The World As We Know It

*

-is that the U.S. will survive because the

RELIGIOUS RIGHT ARE CONFIDENT

 AND

 REPRODUCE

BUT

 THAT EUROPE IS FINISHED

Its not just demographic decline, he says, it's also the unsustainability of the

MODERN WELFARE STATE

-in which we depend so much on our own individual resources.

We are also, he believes, suffering from 'civilisational exhaustion':

CULTURAL DISINTEGRATION

-brought about by

BIG GOVERNMENT

[Or if you prefer BIG BROTHER]

-which has fatally

DESTROYED OUR SENSE OF SELF-RELIANCE.

 

MEANWHILE, we are importing large numbers of unemployed youths from abroad in order to maintain

OUR

STANDARD OF LIVING

Yet many of these newcomers have nothing

BUT

CONTEMPT

 FOR OUR

WAY OF LIFE

-and some even wish

TO DESTROY IT

Steyn sees this as a

CIVIL WAR

which

EUROPE

-is too timid even to acknowledge - let alone

LET ALONE WIN

[This is something the Tory Mr Oliver Letwin or as we have said on a number of occasions Mr Let-them-win -and they will, who appears to be out of touch with the real issues that matter to our country in the early years of the 21st century.]

Mr Steyn says:

'Islam has youth and WILL

Europe has age and WELFARE.'

It's hard not to agree with Mark Steyn, especially as every day seems to bring more evidence

THAT AS A SOCIETY

WE ARE TERMINALLY

MAD

For example, this week's fertiliser bomb trial had heard that the key plotters had been radicalised by the hate preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed whom the judge condemned as

'a master of cowardice -who works in the shadows.'

This was the same firebrand who as an asylum -seeker here, had pocketed

£275,000

-in Welfare benefits.

[It is the same mentality shown by

Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer and many others

-who instead of spending the £32 million allocated for building prisons a few years ago are now doing almost anything in order to keep thousands of criminals many repeat offenders and dangerous, out of prison and giving many early release so they can go back to torment their victims and as has happened in a number of occasions returned to have another go at their robbery or other offence knowing that the worst that might happen is either a holiday or community service or whatever  and as many prisons these days are very much like 5star hotels there will be no hardship encountered if they are so lucky to win the prison admission lottery -then it will be a nice break to see old friends and anyway they will be out before they have completed their degree in political science or whatever.

The victims of crime, many of them elderly - poor and lonely won't as a rule be free of fear of their tormentor returning for a second or even third try to rob them of the little they have  and as has happened even assault and kill the defenceless pensioner - but some victims even lose heart and end their own lives by depriving themselves of food because they have lost hope that they can be safe again and we have their so-called protectors such as The Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer the new 'Justice' Minister ? who says 'Jail's the wrong place for burglars' and others who are doing whatever they can to keep the criminals out of jail. If the Army can put up a temporary  barracks in double quick time then there would be spaces for all the thousands of criminals who should be

OUT OF THE COMMUNITY.

Of course there would be complaints that the conditions are not up to the standards of the 5star prisons that they have 'visited' over the years and anyway there is

Tony Blair's

1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

to keep them out of such uncomfortable surroundings which would not provide the 'key' service which has been introduced with their friendly solicitor providing a drugs service as an extra comfort.

THERE IS NO LONGER JUSTICE AS THE SENTENCE DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME

ANYMORE]

*

To continue:

Despite all this, I still believe there are grounds for hope - largely because Muslim hotheads have overplayed their hand by blowing people up, rioting in their neighbourhoods or broadcasting hate -filled speeches which alienate them from the host community.

*

 

[Well we are of the opinion that until the Government shows to the Muslim population that they will not give way on insisting that ALL newcomers and those already with us conform to

OUR RULE OF LAW

 

-and punish without hesitation any breaches of the Law and make it plain that anyone who is a threat to our country WILL BE extradited. BUT of course we have Tony Blair's 1998 Human Rights Act and articles within the 1951 British led Convention of Human Rights which will need amending.

It should be made quite clear that those who have no intention to

INTEGRATE

-should be reminded of their commitment which they gave when they where granted immigration or asylum status (which should be a legal requirement in the future)

Unless drastic action is taken by the next Prime Minister as a priority , future generations of the indigenous population will find themselves foreigners in their own country with their religion and culture under growing  threat. The evidence is before our eyes it is a warning of what the future will bring if action is not taken

QUICKLY AND DECISIVELY

Those moderate Muslims will at last feel secure in the knowledge that they are safe from the extremist influence which up to now they have had it all their own way. By our commitment

IT WILL BE SECURITY THROUGH STRENGTH OF PURPOSE AND THE MUSLIMS WILL BE WITH US

Continue as NOW and they will have nothing but contempt for our indecision and inadequate moral integrity.]

*

To continue:

The sharp-suited, soft spoken undercover agents of the

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

-the banned Egyptian group whose former members include Osma Bin Laden -understand that power is best secured by

STEALTH

by infiltrating institutions and seducing the

MEDIA

Libya's Colonel Gaddafi once exemplified this policy

He said:

'There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe -without swords, without guns-without conquests. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.'

 

[AND THEY SURE MEAN IT]

 

 

[Our survival as a Christian nation can only be achieved by the Government reversing it's abhorrent legislation as to Religious freedom of speech and action because not to do so further emphasises to the extremist elements in our country that we are WEAK and AMORAL nation and therefore ready for conversion by stealth as their numbers obtain the victory while we ignore our Christian past at our peril.

Our close relations to America must be strengthened particularly in the moral arena so that our nations will gain the grudging respect of those who have a desire to replace our Christian heritage with their own.

There will be many who will say that we live in a secular environment and that the Government of the day should not concern itself but we have no choice we either support our Institutions and that includes our Christian inheritance which is ingrained into the very fabric of our nation or  lose that priceless heirloom the foundation of our IDENTITY and accept another more fanatical regime who do not believe in toleration but only in the observance of their one and only deliverer who will have no other faiths before it.

WE HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE

-because a vacuum must be filled and it is better that we know what contain.

The Choice Is Yours!

-but better it will be to retain our own heritage than be converted to another.]

*

But the violent extremists have provoked some signs of a backlash, not just among indigenous populations of Europe but among those tolerant immigrants who value the countries

THAT TOOK THEM IN

The Swedes, of all people, whom liberals claimed had produced a perfect society, are trying to row back on the

WELFARE STATE

-to encourage the

WORK ETHIC

and are demanding

THAT IMMIGRANTS INTEGRATE

 

Nyamko Sabuni a female, Muslim, African immigrant who is now the country's

INTEGRATION and EQUALITY

MINISTER

-insists that

ALL IMMIGRANTS

-should learn Swedish and find a job.

 

She is also intent on criminalising

FORCED MARRIAGES

CHECKING GIRLS FOR EVIDENCE OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION

and

BANNING THE VEIL

as well as

STATE FUNDING

for RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.

[This is an area that needs the new Premier Gordon Brown to put his attention as to make it plain that their is one

RULE OF LAW

in

ENGLAND

[NO EXCEPTIONS FOR MUSLIMS OR ANYONE ELSE IN OUR COUNTRY]

 

 

*          *          *

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/

 

The  Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

*

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

H.F.1300                                      Brought forward from 2007

 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018-(1994 -Official Website -M AY-PT1-(2018)- -MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2 -2018

  MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018        MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018-

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

MAY-FREEDOM NOW- NEW-HOME--2018

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PT1-2018