MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018 -(1994 -Official Website-MAY-NEW-PT 5- 2018 )MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018          MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018          MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 
Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 & EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE
 

 

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

 

A REMINDER TO THOSE WHO STILL KOW-TOW

TO

 BRUSSELS AND BERLIN

 

'...We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you.'

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

 EDMUND BURKE

 Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 *

1+2

 

 

 The

 I was accused of being racist, I knew political correctness had gone MAD

 

 

Political correctness had gone mad, writes TREVOR ... - Daily Mail

 
 

EXTRACT

A FEW weeks ago I observed that Barack Obama's iconic status as the first African-American US President should not obscure his mixed political record

For that, I was accused by one Radio 4 commentator of peddling a 'racist narrative

As a black man and former chairman of the

EQUALITY and HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

you might think I would be surprised to face a charge of

RACISM

but I was not.

For at a time when this country is crying out for frank discussion on issues such as race and sexuality, debate is being closed down because those who find offence in everything cry

RACIST or SEXIST.

The result - as I argue tonight in a TV programe -is that our

POLITICAL and CULTURAL ELITE

 seem unable to speak plainly about things that concern many citizens .

While our rulers seem to have all the time in the world to debate who should use the lavatory (in deference to the transgender lobby), they dismiss anxieties about

OVERCROWDED SCHOOLS

 DOCTORS SURGERIES

as merely a bigoted dislike of migrants.

HOW HAS THIS COME ABOUT?

[To follow]

Hounded...

Tyranny...

Hapless...

 

 

 

 

Full article

 

Multiculturalism is no longer right for Britain

[Mr Phillips has known for many years that MULTICULTURALISM WAS NEVER RIGHT FOR BRITAIN and in fact NOT  RIGHT

ANYWHERE.]

 

 

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

('the creation of a common mind') is a Soviet concept: 'Political correctness' means the exact reverse of what it says: It means that lies, or an 'imposed truth', supplant the objective truth' the exact reverse of what it says: it means that lies, or an 'imposed truth' supplant the objective truth. 'Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism' states, in an essay entitled 'Marxism-Leninism as a Philosophy and a WorldOutlook', that'...in deciding other affairs [sic], methods of public influence, the influence of public opinion will be utilised'. In a collectivised society, 'the Communist man...[is] distinguished by conscious collectivism and deep concern for the common good'; but the issues which preoccupy him are those imposed upon his controlled and easily manipulated mind by 'political correctness'.  In his closing remarks to the 28th CPSU Congress on 13th July 1990, Mikhail Gorbachev said that the restructured' CPSU would become a truly vanguard party whose power lies not in giving orders but in influencing people's minds'.

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

BY

CHRISTOPHER STORY

[WE HAVE A LARGE NUMBER OF BULLETINS ON OUR WEBSITE SINCE 2005 DETAILING THE WORK OF THE ABOVE

A

TRUTH SEEKER AND PATRIOT

*

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

-ENEMY OF ITS MEMBER STATES BY CHRISTOPHER STORY -

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

*

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

FEBRUARY 23, 2017

H F 1130 FREEDOM NOW
[A REMINDER FROM 2010 TO THOSE REMAINERS WHO PUT PERSONAL CONSIDERATIONS BEFORE THAT OF LOYALTY TO CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY]

*

 

WHAT FREDERICK FORSYTH STATED:

 

ONCE WE ARE FREE OF THE EU THE WORLD IS OUR OYSTER

 

 

It HAD to come sooner or later and now it has happened. A major national newspaper, the Daily Express, has called for Britain to end its full membership of the European Union.

  Let us get two points clear.

 

1.   this does not mean severing our 1,000-year trading relationship with that continent.   trade is what we live by, always have.  Trade is what we were told 38 years ago was what would be freed and enhanced by joining the [EEC] European Economic Area.    Trade without tariffs, duties, taxes, protectionism and bureaucracy.

 

And we said YES.

 

We were lied to. 

HEATH

 lied to us.  They still do.  The EU of today and tomorrow

 

is not about trade

 

It is about the end of a nation state, replaced by a vast central governed empire.

For years this has been denied

 

Now it is very clearly out in the open.  But the huge majority of our people are deeply wedded to Old Blighty and refuse to abolish her by tricks and threat to become a devolved regional territory.

 

2.  Inside the European Economic Area like mega-rich Norway, we could trade and trade again with the EU and keep

our country, our laws, our justice system and our sovereignty.

 

And there are vast opportunities out there if only we had the nerve to face outwards not inwards.  Fifty-two nations of the Commonwealth want to increase trade, so does the Anglo-sphere: Ireland, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.  New giants are emerging: Brazil, India, China that make the EU look pathetic.

 

We must turn back to the open oceans whence our properity came. 

That world is growing, the Brussels world is shrinking slowly dying

 

But the [intended] EEA would suit us fine.

 

David Cameron complains about us "banging on about Europe"

You're wrong David.

 

We're banging on about Britain.

So should you.

 

Too many millions of us are sick and tired of endless capitulation.  We do not feel we are a free people any more

 

So listen to us. We want to be free of the thralldom of Brussels.

 

-DAILY EXPRESS-NOV26-2010

 

 

[Since the 'This England ' PETITION of 900,000 signatues increased to a million, to the Queen in 2004 by those indomitable PATRIOTS:   RON and NIGEL MCWHIRTER and JOHN GOURIET who died at their posts fighting to the end for OUR FREEDOM-OUR CONSTITUTION -OUR COUNTRY. We were priviledged to be in their company at the rear of Buckingham Palace when the PETITION was delivered.]

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

NOVEMBER 26,2010

 H.F.1438/1
LITTLEJOHN

 

Let's have another referendum - on scrapping the House of Lords:

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN says he reckons a lot more than

 17.4 million would vote

 to kill off the Upper House

By Richard Littlejohn for the Daily Mail :

January  12, 2018

Freedom of speech is under renewed attack, this time from unelected members of the House of Lords. They have hijacked a bill designed to update Britain's data protection laws to launch an outrageous attempt to shackle the Press.

By a slim majority, peers voted this week to compel newspapers who refuse to sign up for state regulation to pay the legal costs of anyone who brings a complaint against them, regardless of merit.

If they succeed, the financial implications could force some smaller, local papers out of business. It would give carte blanche to crooks and fraudsters to bring actions seeking to gag national newspaper investigations into their nefarious activities, secure in the knowledge that even if they lost it wouldn't cost them a penny.

This is precisely the clause which Parliament threw out last year in relation to vexatious libel claims. Now the Lords are trying to smuggle it in under the guise of data protection.

They are also looking to resurrect the second stage of the ludicrous Leveson Inquiry into the Press, which everyone thought was dead and buried.

The last one was little more than a show trial and most of the parallel criminal cases brought against innocent journalists collapsed ignominiously when they came before a jury.
 

The House of Lords has hijacked a bill designed to update Britain's data protection laws to launch an outrageous attempt to shackle the Press

None of that has deterred their Lordships from straining to get the circus back on the road. For once, the chamber was packed to the gunnels. Normally, the Lords resembles the bridge of the Mary Celeste, save for a few old sweats slumbering away on the well-upholstered leather benches.

Like many of their colleagues in the Commons, some peers are still smarting from newspaper exposures of wrongdoing by members of the Upper Chamber — everything from expenses fiddling, to coke-snorting and consorting with whores.

So they have seized their chance for revenge by using the Data Protection Bill to punish the Press — a purpose for which it was never designed.

Matthew Hancock, the new Culture Secretary, has promised to resist the Lords and overturn the amendments when the Bill comes back to the Commons.

But with the Government's wafer-thin, DUP-bolstered majority, there is a danger some Tory Brexit saboteurs — who have had a well-deserved hammering in newspapers including the Mail — may vote with Labour and the Lib Dems, who are both committed to stifling free speech.

I'm always wary of writing about the Press, because it can appear to be special pleading. But this isn't newspaper navel-gazing, it goes to the heart of what passes for our democracy.

Unelected peers, along with the opposition parties, are trying to bring the Press under the control of a new state regulator, bankrolled by ex-Formula 1 boss Max Mosley — who has been seeking his revenge on Fleet Street ever since the now-defunct News of the World exposed him for taking part in military-themed S&M orgies with prostitutes.

The regulator, called Impress, is stuffed with embittered failed journalists, Left-wing lobbyists and professional Press-haters.

This is the rabble that a majority of peers and a significant number of MPs think should have the final say in what you read in your daily newspapers.
 

Unelected peers, along with the opposition parties, are trying to bring the Press under the control of a new state regulator

No self-respecting publication of note has signed up for Impress, preferring to submit voluntarily to an independent regulatory body called IPSO, chaired by a distinguished and scrupulously impartial former Appeal Court judge, who has the power to order front-page corrections and impose fines of up to £1 million.

That clearly isn't good enough for some politicians, who want to control what appears in the Press, largely to spare themselves embarrassment.

Many of them in the Remain camp, especially, blame the Daily Mail and other publications for 'poisoning' the minds of gullible readers and tricking them into voting Leave. Their contempt for the newspaper-buying public knows no bounds.

Freedom of the Press is under unprecedented pressure, not just from politicians, but from self-appointed bigots trying to bully companies into withdrawing advertising from publications of which they disapprove. Virgin Trains' decision to stop selling the Mail is just the latest pathetic piece of politically motivated posturing aimed at appeasing those who want to silence every single opinion they disagree with.

But there's a much bigger picture here.

This isn't just about Press freedom, it's about the way in which we are governed. What the political class still haven't grasped properly about the Brexit vote is that it wasn't just a rejection of the EU, it was a vote of no confidence in the whole rotten shower of them.

It's bad enough when MPs seek to thwart the will of the people. But when unelected peers try to do the same, it's a coup against democracy.

Remoaners in the House of Lords are pledging to stop

Brexit

by any means possible. Where do these pampered, pompous poltroons get the idea that they have a divine right to sabotage

 a clear decision taken by 17.4 million people — the largest number ever to vote for anything in Britain?

Remoaners in the House of Lords are pledging to stop Brexit by any means possible, writes Richard Littlejohn 

We voted to free ourselves from an unelected, unaccountable government in Europe. Why should we now have our future decided by an unelected, unaccountable second chamber at home?

The effrontery of peers such as the absurd Andrew Adonis, a self-important quangocrat who has never been elected to anything in his life, is staggering.

So, too, Cheerful Charlie Falconer, one of the architects of this week's Lords offensive against the Press. He owes his entire political career to the fact that he was once Tony Blair's flatmate.

In 1999, when Blair got rid of the hereditaries, there were 610 members of the Lords. Today, there are 800 of them. The crusty old aristos have been replaced by a pretty unsavoury collection of political placemen, has-beens, never-wases, PR spivs and party donors.

An ermine robe is a reward for failure. The Lib Dems may have only 12 MPs (just eight in England) as a result of being roundly rejected at the ballot box. But they've got more than 100 peers in the Lords — all of whom are pledged to overturn the Brexit vote.

They can claim £300 a day tax free simply for turning up, which is about all most of them can be bothered to do.

There are plenty of well-documented examples of noble lords clocking in, claiming their allowance, and then clocking straight out again.

Two of them served jail time for fraud as a result of the expenses scandal. No wonder the Lords want to punish the newspapers which exposed them.

Brexit, when we finally get round to it, has given us the opportunity to forge a brand-new future, to liberate the way this country is governed, to make politicians properly accountable to the people who pay their wages.

Maybe we should begin with a referendum on abolishing the House of Lords once and for all.

If that were to happen, I'd wager that many more than 17.4 million would vote to kill it off. And not before time. It is an anachronism which no longer serves any useful purpose.

Until now, reform of the Lords has always been hampered by the fact that no one seems to be able to decide what should replace it.

Who cares?

Why replace it with anything, especially as these days the courts seem to have assumed the function of the second chamber?

With any luck, in attempting to defy the will of the people over Brexit and cynically seeking to shackle freedom of speech,

these arrogant Lords might just have signed their own death warrant.
*  *  *
 

I love, I love, I love my little calendar girls 

Call me male, pale and stale, but that picture of Theresa May and her new female whips at No 10 reminded me of the cast of the movie Calendar Girls, starring Celia Imrie, about the Rylstone and District branch of the Women's Institute.

I can't wait for the calendar, girls.

*Call me male, pale and stale, but that picture of Theresa May and her new female whips at No 10 reminded me of the cast of the movie Calendar Girls

 

Actress Celia Imrie (pictured) posing in her famous scene from the 2003 film Calendar Girls

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5260945/Lets-referendum-scrapping-House-Lords.html#ixzz5441IEpiC
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

 

'Let it be impressed upon your minds, let it be instilled into your children that the liberty of the press is the palladium of all civil, political, and religious rights.'-

Junius

*

The press is not only free, it is powerful. That power is ours. It is the proudest that man can enjoy.  It was not granted by monarchs; it was not gained for us by aristocracies; but it sprang from the people

[YOU!]

and with an immortal instinct, it has always worked for the people.-Disraeli.

[DON'T LET THE  UNREPRESENTATIVE   HOUSE OF LORDS GET THEIR WAY.]

ITS YOUR FREE PRESS

DON'T LOSE IT!]

The Labour man Party manifesto of 1935 called for the abolition of the House of Lords but in 1945 no such proposal was evident.

[The answer as many have voiced over the years is for a representative House of Lords selected for their already proven ability in other spheres of life and not those who's only interest is the need of a daily cash machine to encourage them  to

SERVE THEIR COUNTRY.]

[COMMENTS ARE OURS!]

 

JANUARY 12,2018

 

H.F.1436

 

 DAILY MAIL

 

 

[  GRIM REALITY! NOT A SOAP!]

 

Smug, craven politicians in thrall to notions of diversity, sowed the seeds of the terror we're now reaping, writes

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN

 

THE glowing tributes paid to protection officer PC Keith Palmer were thoroughly deserved. He was the best of British, a man with a selfless sense of duty who served in the Royal Artillery before joining the police.

Constable Palmer who was unarmed, was stabbed to death fending off a crazed jihadist attacker attempting to enter the Houses of Parliament, MPs queued up to honour his bravery and sacrifice. Politicians love to associate themselves with courage of our men and women in uniform.

But, at risk of being accused of cynicism, I couldn't help wondering about the reaction had PC Palmer been a firearms officer who shot dead a knifeman on the streets of London. On past form he'd have been lucky not to end up in the dock at the Old Bailey charged with

MURDER.

Worse, if during his Army days he'd been falsely accused by some crooked solicitor such as Phil Shyster of committing

WAR CRIMES

in Afghanistan, Iraq or Northern Ireland.

his life would have been turned upside down by the historic investigations team and he could now be

ROTTING IN A MILITARY JAIL.

IN either event, the same politicians singing his posthumous praises this week would have washed their hands of

HIM.

Sorry if all this sounds a tad sour, but I found some of the self-congratulatory posturing in the Commons yesterday faintly nauseating. While paying lip service to the

EMERGENCY SERVICES

and their

PARLIAMENTARY STAFF,

It  struck me that what many MPs- with a few honourable exceptions-

WERE REALLY CELEBRATING WAS THEIR OWN PERCEIVED HEROISM.

The real heroes

were on

WESTMINSTER BRIDGE

and in

NEW PALACE YARD

TRYING TO SAVE LIVES.

They weren't cowering in the secure confines of the

COMMONS CHAMBER

Tweeting.

Although this attack has been pained, with justification, as an assault on the

MOTHER OF PARLIAMENTS,

their was never any danger to a single MP inside its walls.

PC Palmer and the plain clothes officer who shot dead the attacker

MADE SURE OF THAT.

Just to be on the safe side, though, the first thing the parliamentary  authorities did yesterday was to order another lorry load of concrete barriers to add to the already formidable security measures surrounding the Palace of Westminster

Not that they'd have been any good to those

INNOCENTS

who were

MURDERED

or catastrophically injured on the

BRIDGE

But at least

 DEMOCRACY will be SAFE

Every time there is  a terrorist atrocity, either here or abroad, the politicians go through the same old motions, mouthing platitudes about never surrendering to evil.

 BUT  BY THEIR ACTIONS

they

BETRAY

their

HOLLOW RHETORIC

and the

REST OF US HAVE TO LIVE WITH THE CONSEQUENCES

It is the political class who have fostered the conditions which allow

ISLAMIST FUNDAMENTALISM TO FLOURISH IN BRITAIN

They encouraged the pernicious doctrine of

'MULTICULTURALISM'

-which is just a fancy word for

APARTHEID

and has created vast, monocultural Muslim

GHETTOES

in

OUR GREAT CITIES...

 

She was killed by a deranged Right-wing fantasist, acting alone. The difference is that he set out specifically to murder Miss Cox. Islamist jihadis want to randomly kill anyone. As many as possible. Believers or non-believers. They’re not fussy.

The Westminster killer may have been flying solo, but he is part of a global terror movement which aims to destroy the West and anyone who doesn’t subscribe to their particular strain of Islam.

You may have noticed I haven’t wasted too much ink thus far on the murderer himself. That’s because I don’t want to glorify him. He was born in Britain, lived in Birmingham and was aged 52.

So that gives the lie to the ‘impressionable young man radicalised over the internet’ myth.

Almost inevitably, he had been on the radar, according to the Prime Minister. He had a long criminal record, had been investigated ‘historically’ but was now considered to be on the ‘periphery’.

Maybe if the Old Bill had spent less time chasing ‘historic’ sex offenders, they might have been able to discover that he wasn’t that peripheral after all.

Not that I blame the anti-terror services. They’re overstretched, trying to clean up the mess created by politicians. They’re doing a fantastic job in the circumstances and have foiled an impressive number of plots.

Just as well. Given that the latest perpetrator was well into his sixth decade, it suggests we are now looking at two, maybe even three, generations of home-grown jihadis.

Before the internet took off, terrorists were recruited through mosques. Scotland Yard even closed roads around Finsbury Park mosque so that Captain Hook could peddle his poison.

In the Nineties, the political class took the view that provided the Islamists didn’t commit any acts of terror on British soil, they were welcome to operate with impunity. All that achieved was to allow the merchants of death to establish deep roots here, with utterly predictable consequences.

Smug, craven politicians, in thrall to notions of ‘diversity’ and multiculturalism, sowed the seeds of the terrorism we are now reaping.

This week, innocent bystanders and tourists on Westminster Bridge, along with brave PC Keith Palmer, paid the ultimate price, while heavily protected MPs — fresh from their glowing tributes to another evil terrorist, Martin McGuinness — congratulated themselves on their own bravery and resolve.

Makes you proud to be British.

 

Much more in

Full Article

* * *

[A most excellent article which covers so many twists and turns to reveal the incompetence and flawed policies of politicians over the past decades which has brought amongst us those of an opposing culture many of whom still consider our settled population as 'infidels'. Our countries foreign policy in the Middle EAST over the past decades with illegal wars-BLAIR and BUSH for the purposes of controlling the oil supplies. Over the past 100 years , the securing oil supplies by Britain -France-Holland and American companies- SAUDI-ARABIA... and the wealth obtained by the oil companies and countries involved but particularly SAUDI ARABIA has enabled the hardened feature of fanatical ISLAM to spread around the world but particularly in Europe and throughout the Middle East and Africa. The bribe offered Britain and USA particularly was investment in LONDON and NEW YORK ans ARMS CONTRACTS. There is no longer a safe region of the world -where there are  fanatical supporters of ISLAM. Of course there are many moderate Muslims but even they ( DM.60% ?) who in the main would support their fellow adherents because it would be their life's cause to live in  an ISLAMIC STATE with FULL SHARIA LAW.  This is WHY! knowing the difficulties ,only a small number of MUSLIMS should have been permitted to immigrate to the UK on the condition that they could not be full citizens unless they fully integrated into SOCIETY. With such a large Muslim population of approximately 3,000,000 and with a birth-rate advantage of 4-1 it is probably now an almost unsolvable conundrum . But it must be faced down, or even greater dangers will follow in the years ahead. Therefore, as Mr Richard Littlejohn's article so clearly demonstrates, our politicians past and present by their laxity and political correctness and naivety are responsible for the present dangerous situation in our once -more spacious and less crowded and settled land.]

*

 

 

'MULTICULTURALISM'

 

 

OUR GREAT CITIES...

 

 

*

[A most excellent article which covers so many twists and turns to reveal the incompetence and flawed policies of politicians over the past decades which has brought amongst us those of an opposing culture many of whom still consider our settled population as 'infidels'. Our countries foreign policy in the Middle East over the past 100 years securing oil supplies and the wealth obtained by the oil companies and countries involved but particularly SAUDI ARABIA has enabled the hardened feature of fanatical ISLAM to spread around the world but particularly in Europe and throughout the Middle East and Africa. There is no longer a safe region of the world -where there are  fanatical supporters of ISLAM. Of course there are many moderate Muslims but even they in the main would support their fellow adherents because it would be their life's cause to live in  an ISLAMIC STATE with FULL SHARIA LAW.  This is WHY! knowing the difficulties ,only a small number of MUSLIMS should have been permitted to immigrate to the UK on the condition that they could not be full citizens unless they fully integrated into SOCIETY. With such a large Muslim population of approximately 3,000,000 and with a birth-rate advantage of 4-1 it is probably now an unsolvable conundrum  but it must be faced down or even greater dangers will follow in the years ahead. Therefore, as Mr Richard Littlejohn's article so clearly demonstrates our politicians have been responsible for the present dangerous situation in our once more spacious and settled land.]

*

TOLERATION

'Toleration is a good thing in its place; but you cannot tolerate what will not tolerate you, and is trying to cut your throat.'- Froude

*

'Religious  liberty, according to both Locke and Montesquieu, may and does require intolerance of an intolerant religion; and the very spirit of peace and gentleness may require war be waged by the state against an aggressive religion.'- Connelly.

[The British Government won't clean up its own backyard let alone decide FOREIGN POLICY in order to PROTECT those of the CHRISTIAN FAITH in the world at large. What could be a better message at this time of the year to send out than that we will not tolerate the slaughter of CHRISTIANS or others of other FAITHS who's message is GOODNESS-PEACE and HARMONY for ALL MANKIND.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER 10-2016

*  *  *

ADDED MARCH 2018

 
Searches related to WHY SHARIA COURTS MUST BE BANNED TO FURTHER FULL INTEGRATION OF 3MILLION MUSLIMS IN ENGLAND WITH THEIR BIRTH-RATE ADVANTAGE OF 4-1

mayor of leeds uk

who is the mayor of oldham england

mayor of sheffield uk

who is the mayor of blackburn england

mayor of rockdale uk

mayor of birmingham england

mayor of luton uk

mayor of rochdale uk

 H. F .1156/1

IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

MARCH 24 -2017

H.F.1156 FREEDOM NOW
 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM MARCH 2006

 

Quit Britain if you want Sharia Law says Trevor Phillips.

 *

Daily Mail

Monday, February 27, 2006

 By

 Steve Doughty

Social Affairs Correspondent

  

MUSLIMS WHO WANT TO LIVE UNDER ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS LAW

SHOULD LEAVE BRITAIN

 

-the head of the Race Equality Watchdog said yesterday.

 

The country must have one set of laws decided by Parliament and anyone who wants something different should ‘live somewhere else’, Trevor Phillips said.

 

The warning from the Chief of the Commission for Racial Equality followed a survey, which found that four out of ten British Muslims would like to see Shariah Law -Islamic religious law -enforced in districts where they are in a majority.

 

His remarks in an interview on ITV’s Jonathan Dibble programme suggest he believes that large numbers of Muslims are failing to integrate into British society.

 

Mr Phillips has run into controversy recently by rejecting the Left-wing doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

 

-and warning that, in some areas, Britain is ‘sleepwalking to segregation’.

 

Yesterday he said everyone who lives here should have a sense of Britishness.

 

He said of the idea of Shariah Law in Muslim-dominated communities:

 

‘I don’t think that conceivable.’

 

‘We have one set of laws.

 

They are decided by one group of people, members of Parliament and that’s the end of the story. If you want to have laws decided in another way, you have to live somewhere else.

 

Mr Phillips also said that ‘some minorities’ should accept that freedom expression meant that people had a right to give offence.

 

He said the right to give offence was ‘absolutely precious’ and added:

 

‘What some minorities have to accept is that there are certain central things we all agree about, which are about the way we treat each other -that we have an attachment to democracy, that we sort things out by voting not by violence and intimidation, that we tolerate things that we don’t like.

 

‘Short of people menacing and threatening each other, we have freedom of expression.

 

We allow people to offend each other.’

 

The same, he said, applied to Muslim preachers who should be free to give offence to gay pressure groups by condemning homosexuality.

 

‘One point of Britishness is that people can say what they like about the way we should live, however absurd, however unpopular it is.’

 

[Sir Ian Blair and his ilk we hope are taking in these precious words of wisdom and remain silent in the future in matters that do NOT concern them allowing more police time to catch the burglars -murderers and other violent criminals who have never had it so good when they see the police wasting their time on THOUGHT CRIMES which are no crimes at all]

To continue:

 

Mr Phillips said:

 

‘That’s why I believe that freedom of expression -including Muslim leaders’ right to say they think homosexuality is harmful -is absolutely precious.

 

‘Once we start to limit freedom of expression, the people who suffer most are minorities.’

 

Mr Phillips has managed to offend a number of former allies in the Labour Party and on the Left in recent months with his attack on the

 

MULTICULTURALISM

 

-that has underpinned Government thinking since Tony Blair came to power.

 

The CRE chief has said everyone in the country should speak English and that the development of cultural groups with their own languages and districts threatens to create a segregated society.

 

The Muslim Council of Britain said last night that Mr Phillips was wrong to think many Muslims wanted to see Sharia Law in this country.

 

Spokesman Inayat Bunglawala said:

 

‘I don’t believe Muslims are really calling for the implementation of Shariah Law. The findings of the poll highlights, in our opinion, the importance many attach to living by a code of conduct derived from Islamic teachings.’

 

He added:

 

‘British Muslims-like other communities -fully appreciate the value of

 

FREE SPEECH.’

 

* * *

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets]

MARCH/2006

*  *  *

ADDED MARCH 2018

[After 12 years with no government having taken any effective action to encourage the greater number of intransient MUSLIMS  to INTEGRATE which is estimated to be at least 60% , which is no doubt an underestimate ,because the Muslim population know from past 12 years experience that any government is afraid to act responsibly because they need the votes. Plain and Simple!  Even moderate Muslim clerics have for many years called for stronger and more effective ACTION! and are still calling in vein.

We are now told that under new laws schools are to force integration by ensuring that there is a mixed race in classrooms.  All this could have been avoided if immigration had been controlled at the outset and only allowed  small numbers of those of opposing religions/customs to show that they would indeed integrate before allowing further inflows, rather than what we have experienced with over 3,000,000 /4,000,000 Muslims now amongst us? Even the Government admit they don't know the true figure.

The Jewish population is around 300,000 and this should have been the population bench mark for those of the Muslim Faith. Those who would not integrate would be asked TO LEAVE BRITAIN.  If this had been followed from the outset what a different  scenario we would have evidenced with a more settled population we would be witnessing today in  March 2018.

We have been informed recently that 16,000,000 people will lose their jobs to Robots. It beggars belief that this was not envisaged decades ago because this fact should have been constantly in the mind of politicians. AS we have stated many years ago we live in a small island a quarter to a  third of countries like GERMANY and FRANCE. We hear that many of those who should be deported are able to avoid it by using the so-called HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION which in fact in many many instances is nothing of the sort-but a wonderful earner for the LEGAL PROFESSION and an unneccessary charge on the TAXPAYER. The sooner we ditch this monstrous legislation and bring in a BRITISH and more sensible and equitable BRITISH BILL of RIGHTS which distinguishes RIGHT! from WRONG! the sooner we will be able to ensure that RIGHT JUSTICE is DONE!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1503
 
 

The number of Muslims in Europe reaches

44 MILLION

 
 

[MUSLIM POPULATION

 WITHIN EACH PARTICULAR

ONCE FREE NATION STATE

 WITHIN THE EU]

 
WHERE THEY LIVE
 

 Germany---       4,760,000--------------5.8per cent

 France--------     4,710,000-------------7.5 per cent

 Britain--------      2,960,000-------------4.6per cent

Italy--------------2,220,000-------------7per cent   

 Bulgaria-----------1,020,000-----------13.7per cent

 Netherlands------1,000,000-------------6.0percent

 Spain--------------980,000--------------2.3percent

 Belgium-----------630,000-------------5.9 percent

 Greece-------------610,000--------------5.3percent

 Austria------------450,000--------------5.4percent

by

Ian Drury- 

Daily Mail

Home Affairs Correspondent

*  *  *

 

   [ The above figures are no doubt an estimate of each nation 's Muslim population therefore there could be millions more at any one time. Our own government has admitted it does not know the full number, as  those who should have left the country are still here, and others over the years have melted into the population. We also know from experience over the years from those at No 10 are not very good at simple Arithmetic!- when it suits them!]

[WITH THE BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 THE MUSLIM POPULATION IN ENGLAND WILL GROW TO SURPASS THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION IN A MATTER OF A FEW GENERATIONS AND THEN THEY WILL HAVE THEIR ISLAMIC STATE WITH ITS STRICT SHARIA LAW AND SEEING HOW THE MAJORITY OF THE MUSLIMS IN OUR COUNTRY HAVE REACTED TO THE MASSACRE IN FRANCE THERE WILL BE NO TOLERANCE OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM WHICH WE HAVE GIVEN THEM. OF COURSE THERE ARE MANY MUSLIMS WHO DECRY THE SILENCE OF THE MAJORITY OF MUSLIMS BUT UNTIL THE GREATER MAJORITY BECOME THE NORM THERE WILL BE NO LIKELIHOOD OF THEIR INTEGRATION INTO OUR SOCIETY.

THE MAJOR FAULT FOR THE SITUATION WE SEE BEFORE US IN THE MIDDLE EAST IS BECAUSE OF THE WEST'S-[USA-UK-FRANCE] HISTORY OF EXPLOITATION IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES IN REGARD TO OIL SUPPLIES OVER THE PAST 97 YEARS AND INTERFERENCE IN THE AFFAIRS OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES WHICH HAS BROUGHT MANY ILLEGAL WARS WITH GREAT SLAUGHTER AND DEVASTATION TO THEIR POPULATIONS.

THE IRISH QUESTION IS A YARD STICK TO SEE HOW LONG INJUSTICE TO A PEOPLE CAN HAVE DIRE CONSEQUENCES EVEN TODAY IN NOVEMBER 2015. IRONICALLY IT WAS THE WAR MONGER TONY BLAIR WHO FOUND THE SOLUTION WHICH BROUGHT PEACE HOWEVER FRAGILE.  BUT HE FAILED TO LEARN FROM HISTORY ABOUT THE INTERFERENCE IN THE MATTERS OF OTHER NATION STATES -PARTICULARLY MUSLIM-A PEOPLE DEDICATED TO THEIR RELIGION ISLAM-THOUGH THEY HAVE DIFFERENT SECTS OF FOLLOWERS ,WHO HAVE YEARNED TO BE THEMSELVES!

WE BELIEVE THAT THE ANSWER TO THE FLOOD OF REFUGEES  FROM ITS OUTSET SHOULD HAVE BEEN TO KEEP THE REFUGEES IN THE MIDDLE EAST -SAUDI ARABIA-HAS TENTED AREA TO ACCEPT 3,000,000 -EGYPT-JORDON...WITH MASSIVE FINANCIAL  HELP AND SHELTER ETC OFFERED TO THOSE COUNTRIES UNSTINTINGLY BUT ALLOW A CONTROLLED FLOW OF WAR REFUGEES TO THOSE COUNTRIES WILLING TO TAKE THEM-_BUT NO COMPULSION SHOULD BE MADE. IN THIS WAY THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED THE CATASTROPHE WE SEE BEFORE US IN EUROPE.

 

*

 

  1. The number of Muslims in Europe reaches

     

    44million -

     

     

    Daily Mail

     

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../

     

    The-Paris-attacks-drawn-renewed-attention-Europe-s-

     

    growing-Muslim-population.html

     

     

     ... The number of Muslims in Europe reaches

     

    44m: Serious concerns

     

     

    raised about
     

     

    the ... By Ian Drury Home Affairs Correspondent For The Daily Mail ... By contrast,
    t

     

    The UK has about 2.9million Muslims – the third largest number.
     

     

     
          

     

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

NOVEMBER 16-2015

 

 

H F 550
 
 

 

[IT WAS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME! FOR THIS ARTICLE TO BE PROVED CORRECT. MAY 8,2018]

 

 

 

Daily Mail

 

 

 

Mother Theresa or Maggie May?

 

(Only time will tell!)

 

 

 

by Richard Littlejohn

 
EXTRACT

THIS column doesn't do honeymoon periods. So if you're expecting me to join in Mother Theresa's coronation celebrations, you've come to the wrong place.

Regular readers will need no reminding that I don't exactly share this newspaper's enthusiasm for our next Prime Minister.

Her record at the Home Office is far less impressive than her cheerleaders pretend.

SHE FAILED MISERABLY TO CONTROL  IMMIGRATION;

didn't DEPORT

 FOREIGN CRIMINALS BACK TO THE EU COUNTRIES

and reappointed the appalling

Bernard Hyphen-Howe as Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police

As for her alleged leadership qualities, she backed the

LOSING REMAIN CAMPAIGN

even though she had always given the impression that

 SHE WAS EUROSCEPTIC

and then spent most of the campaign hiding behind the sofa.

Her obligatory contribution to

PROJECT FEAR

was to warn that

BRITAIN WOULD BE SAFER AND STRONGER INSIDE THE EU.

presumably, now that

WE'VE VOTED OUT

she believes

WE ARE WEAKER AND MORE VULNERABLE.

Curious how Boris was accused of acting out of personal ambition when he chose to  lead the BREXITEERS.

Yet no one suggested Theresa  might have been similarly motivated when

SHE OPTED FOR REMAIN.

Don't forget the majority of Conservative MPs were also in the REMAIN CAMP.

which most people expected to win.

So by staying loyal to the official line, she would have been handily placed to run as the establishment candidate when Call Me Dave called it a day.

Does anyone seriously believe that cynical calculation didn't cross her mind when she was working out which way to jump in January?

As it is, the keys to No 10 have fallen into her lap after the implosion of the Leave leadership.

Andrea Leadsom, who wisely withdrew yesterday, was an accidental candidate and stood scant chance of winning. She was only left holding the shredded standard when Michael Gove detonated his suicide belt, taking Boris with him.

It's no good Leadsom complaining that she was subjected to a concerted dirty tricks campaign.

THAT'S POLITICS. IF SHE COULDN'T COPE WITH PERSONAL ABUSE, SHE'D NEVER CUT IT AS PRIME MINISTER....

 

 

[WE AGREE WITH EVERY WORD THAT RICHARD LITTLE JOHN HAS STATED-IT WAS A BETRAYAL AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN REWARDED. IF THE NEW GOVERNMENT IS TO MEAN SOMETHING THEN IT SHOULD NOT BE TARNISHED FROM ITS BEGINNING. ALL WE CAN HOPE FOR IS THAT MRS MAY NOW KNOWS THAT MILLIONS WHO VOTED TO LEAVE THE CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-COSTLY-UNACCOUNTABLE-UNDEMOCRATIC NIGHTMARE CALLING ITSELF THE EUROPEAN UNION WHEN ACROSS THE LENGTH BREADTH OF THAT BEAST'S PLACE OF CAPTIVITY MILLIONS OF PATRIOT NATIONALS  ARE UP IN ARMS DEMANDING THEIR COUNTRY BACK!- WILL EXPECT NO FALTERING IN EXPEDITING OUR EXIT FROM CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE-POST HASTE!  AFTER 43 YEARS TO RETURN TO OUR LONG ACCUSTOMED ETHOS AS WORLD TRADERS-THE WORLD OUR OYSTER!]

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 12-2016

H .F.914 FREEDOM NOW!
 
 
 
 

EU QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

There are over 1000 Bulletins on the EU in our

BULLETIN FILE

IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

 CLICK FOR TOP TOPICS

JUNE -2009

1]      EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]     WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU ?

3]     THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]     THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5]     THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]     COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]     OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]      MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]       OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10]    VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]    THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]    PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14]    THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]    A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

 WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]    WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]    100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT1          100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT2

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007] -NOT MUCH LUCK HERE!

33]    ALMOST 50% OF EU BUDGET SPENT ON CAP FATCATS

34]    SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU

35]    WHY BRITISH BUSINESS IS TURNING AGAINST THE EU

36]    BRITISH CONSTITUTION-IDENTITY AND VALUES

37]    MODERN DILEMA IN POLITICS-TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM.

38]    LETTER FROM LORD KILMUIR TO TED HEATH WITH TRUE FACTS OF EU

39]    INTERVIEW WITH RUSSIAN DISSIDENT WHO WARNED OF EU DICTATORSHIP

40]   The Truth About A Federal Europe - Part I

41]   Cost of EU to UK - £4,811 million in 2003= 40 District Hospitals equipped and staffed and funded.

42]  CAN THE 1972 ACCESSION TREATY TO THE EU BE REPEALED?

43]  Neil Kinnock in glover - but failed to stop the Shadow of graft over EU’s £68bn spending.

44]  Now the EU wants a single Foreign Office to replace Nation-States Embassies.

45]   How the EU takes over Nation-States.

46]  A Fabian Europhile of 1947 supported Independent Nation-States and the Rule of Law

47]     The New European Constitution - Part 1

48]  12-Point Summary of EU Constitution continued - Part 2

49]  The New European Constitution - Part 1

50]  An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.

51]   Britain takes over as biggest contributor to the EU Budget

52]  Neil Kinnock sacked honest Auditor because of refusal to sign off questionable EU Accounts.

53]    General De Gaulle acclaims British national institutions back in 1960.

54]    Brussels scams can let an MEP fiddle £60,000 a year.

55]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 1

56]    The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 2

57]    Europe and a conspiracy of Silence.

58]    Ninety-nine countries will soon have Free Trade with EU -without paying a cent to Brussels.

59]   Britain must leave the EU as UN show best area for expansion will be USA-Anglo.Saxon sphere.

60]  82 million Germans have no say as MP’s back EU Constitution.

61]    The EU big brother policy reaches back over two millennium.

62]     Europe: It’s the modern version of the white man’s burden.

63]    E U COUNCIL OF MINISTERS.

64]    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.

65]    German - Nazi - Geopolitical Centre established in Madrid in 1943 by Heinrich Himmler.

66]     What were the Dark Actors Playing Games, which the patriot Dr David Kelly referred?

67]    DEMOCRACY IS A DIALECTICAL FARCE BECAUSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES CALL THE SHOTS NOT SO-CALLED DEMOCRACIES.

68]    Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

69]     EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE.

70]     NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

71]      WHY NO TREATY LIMITING EU POWERS

72]     THE E.U.’S VERY OWN AESOPIAN LANGUAGE.

73]    WHAT IF ENGLAND HADN'T JOINED THE EU

74]    67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM EU

75]   WILL IRELAND SAVE EUROPE FROM ITSELF?

76]   WHY EU REGIONAL POLICY WILL DESTROY THE NATION STATE

77]     EMPIRES HAVE GONE AND MOST PEOPLE LIVE IN NATION STATES.

78 THE FINAL BETRAYAL- WHICH TOOK PLACE IN 2008 

79]    WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR-NOW BROWN-SHE DIDN'T - BUT SOLD US TO THE EU80] 

80]     Almost everything ,which is precious in our civilisation, has come from small States

81]     THE EU BIG BROTHER POLICY REACHES BACK OVER TWO MILLENNIUM

82]     THE EURO A DOOMED CURRENCY

83]      GERMANY AS STRONG MAN OF EUROPE

84]     BRITAIN AND EUROPE-THE CULTURE OF DECEIT

85]     NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

86]     A BETTER WAY FORWARD TOGETHER IN EUROPE-OUT OF THE EUROPEAN UNIOn

87]      A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

88]     TO CONTROL OUR COURTS AND BORDERS IS THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL EUROSCEPTIC STRATEGY.
89]     BLACK OPERATIONS AND TRICKERY BIND UK TO EU
90]     HITLER-HAUSHOFER AND GEORGE KENNON-PENTAGON PLANS IDENTICAL
91]     Oh Boyo - Family on Brussels gravy train cost TAXPAYER £34 million and RISING!
92]     NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

93]      WHY DID THEY WANT BRITAIN IN EUROPE -  IN 1963
94]       Lies and The Betrayal of Britain
95]        Be Warned - The lies of 1975 still haunt us
96]      THe Strange Case of the Werner Report
97]      1972 EU Communities Act
98]        Further 200 Reasons why to Reject the Euro and E
99]      New elite threatens EU project admits Lib-Dem Peer
100]     The secretive Bilderberger Group will destroy True Democracy
101]     BBC EUROPHILE BIAS-UPDATE-by LORD PEARSON

102]     How ‘a good European’ turned into a eurosceptic whistle-blower

103]     HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007
104]     IF Gordon Brown forces this EU TREATY on us, you can kiss goodbye to DEMOCRACY  -HE DID!
105]     FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ARE THE FUTURE OF WORLD TRADE
106]     Twelve Mighty Reasons why you must say 'No' to the EU

107 ]     How much does it cost the UK in the EU
108 ]     THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL
109 ]      IF MONETARY UNION GOES-EUROPEAN PROJECT IS UNDERMINED
110 ]      THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN
111]      YOU CAN'T SEPARATE POLITICS AND MORALS
112]      IRAQ SOCIETY DESCENDING INTO CIVIL WAR BETWEEN SUNNIS - SHI-ITES AND KURDS
113 ]         TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND
114 ]
115 ]

www.eutruth.org.uk

  

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE-2009

H. F .11 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 
 
 
 

 

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 5-2019

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 
 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

      9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA
LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND
SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND
100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

 THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 
  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
    •
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BritAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro

By James Slack Political Editor For The Daily Mail



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

Brexit will let us rediscover role as trading power | Daily Mail Online

Theresa May's Brexit speech puts Cameron to shame | Daily Mail ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Commons and Lords get ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Full reports and analysis

 

A great nation is reborn: Quitting will let us rediscover our role as a ...

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.
 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

  WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

  WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

  WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

  

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

 *		 7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

  WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

  WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW
 
 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 
Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 

ENGLAND
  ENGLAND'S DAY-23RD APRIL-ENGLAND'S DAY
  Understanding Easter- a part of our Christian cultural force which has made us what we are.
   Our Christian Festival of Easter which many know so little and some none.
  CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION
  THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY
  WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY
 

English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died
 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 1
 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 2
 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 3
 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 4
 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 5
 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 1
 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 2
 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 3
 

Christianity, The People, and Ethics - Part 1
 

Christianity, The People, and Ethics - Part 2
 

Alfred –Christian King of the English - Part 1
 

Alfred -Christian King of the English - Part 2
 

 Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty
 

A Defence of Christianity by a once militant agnostic - Part 1.
 

 Dangers of a supreme parliament.
 

 Who CARES about MORALITY?
 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 1.
 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 2.
 

 A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 3.
 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 4.
 

 A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 5.
 

Freedom of Speech-A Freedom, which cannot be abused - is not worth having.
 

Our Past is embedded in our national consciousness-It asks were we came from and who we are.
 

An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.
 

Blairland has almost destroyed the Family Values in its quest for supposed Equality.
 

Two loving parents are more important than good teachers.
 

Celebrate 700 years of Constitutional Development in 2007- from Edward 1 the English Justinian.
 

IMMIGRATION-THE BETRAYAL OF BRICK LANE BY MULTICULTURALISM INSTEAD OF INTEGRATION
 

 The Common Law Of England -Its Heritage and Importance to Parliamentary Democracy Today.
 

Home Rule For Scotland WHY NOT Home Rule For ENGLAND

 

NOR SHALL MY SWORD - THE REINVENTION OF ENGLAND
 

Robocop or Dixon of Dock Green -Millions of Pensioners will choose the latter. The true eyes and ears and friend of the Community.
 

THOUGHTS ON ST. GEORGE's DAY-FREEDOM
 

THE ENEMY EVERYWHERE
 

THOUSANDS OF ENGLISH/BRITISH CITIZENS
REJECTING EU CITIZENSHIP-
WHY DON'T YOU?
 

Free trade agreement.s are the future of world trade
 

THE VEIL – THE CROSS –A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.
 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING
 

ENGLAND'S PLACE IN THE UNION
 

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

  
 

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE - TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUIT- -NOT MULTICULTURAL.
 

Commonwealth Realms v The Constitution for Europe-PT 1- 4
 

DECLARATION OF RESISTANCE
 

 Free Speech - Religious Opinion
 

NO WHERE ELSE flies the White Ensign on top of its tower but the village with the Nelson Touch - As we would EXPECT.
   
   
   
  H.F.1244
 
 
 
 

 
 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

-(1994 -Official Website -MAY-PT 5- 2018 )-

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018-

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

 

FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018