(12-Point
Summary of EU Constitution continued)
Part 2
9. THE NEW EU'S POWERS TO
EXTEND ITS OWN POWERS:
The Constitution would give the EU power
to extend its own powers by two
devices which avoid the need for new
treaties and having to get these
approved by citizens in constitutional
referendums.
Firstly, the Escalator or
"passerelle" clause (Art.IV-444) would allow the European Council of
Presidents and Prime Ministers to move EU law-making for many policy areas from
unanimity to majority voting, as long as they agree unanimously among
themselves and no national Parliament objects; and these days governments
determined on a course of action can usually get
their way with national parliaments.
This
provision would allow the
Constitution to be amended and the
powers of the EU to be significantly
extended without further treaty
ratification.
Secondly, the Flexibility Clause
(Art.I-18) provides that if the Constitution
has not given the EU sufficient powers
to attain its very wide objectives,
the Council of Ministers "shall
adopt the appropriate measures" on the
basis of unanimity.
The
Constitution replaces an existing Community treaty article which applies only
to the internal market, and extends its scope to all policy areas of the new
EU, economic policy, monetary policy for the eurozone, civil and criminal law
matters, foreign policy, social policy,
industry, culture, education, public
health etc.
These
two clauses would mean that the Constitution is not a full guide to its own provisions.
The EU's powers are not restricted by the explicit terms of the Constitution
and would be likely in time to be extended by these two articles.
10. SETTING IN STONE THE EU'S
CURRENT UNDEMOCRATIC STRUCTURE:
The Constitution would give all the
above powers to the new EU while
setting in stone the EU's current
undemocratic structure. The unelected
European Commission would keep the sole
right to propose new EU laws (Art.I-26). The European Central Bank would stay
politically unaccountable through a commitment by all MEPs, EU officials and
national governments "not to seek to influence the ... European Central
Bank"(Art.III-188).
With
increased use of Qualified Majority Voting in the Council of Ministers, the
chances of being out-voted on EU laws and their being imposed on a country
regardless of whether its Government,
Parliament and people all oppose them, would increase.
11. MAKING THE EURO CONSTITUTIONALLY
MANDATORY
Article I-8 provides that
"The currency of the Union shall be the euro."
This is so even though at present 13 of
the 25 Member States still retain
their national currencies and the
Constitution enshrines the legal
opt-outs of Britain and Denmark from the euro (Protocols 13 and 14).
The
non-euro countries are regarded as "Member States with derogation".
This includes Sweden, which is legally committed to adopting the euro even
though its citizens voted by referendum to retain the Swedish crown as their
national currency by 56% to 42% in 2003.
The
Accession Treaties of the 10 new EU Members commit them to adopting the euro.
By ratifying the Constitution
all EU States would accept an implicit
obligation to do this in time, regardless of the legal opt-outs of the UK and
Denmark.
The Protocol on the Euro-Group, which is a full part of
the Constitution, legally binding on all and signed up to by the 25
Governments, refers to special
arrangements among the eurozone
countries "pending the euro becoming the currency of all Member States of
the Union".
Articles
III-198 to 202
deal
with the transition to the euro for the
23 Member States with a derogation.
For
example they are required to treat their exchange rate as "a matter of
common interest" and the
Commission will periodically report on their
progress in moving towards adopting the
euro.
12. AN IDEOLOGICAL CONSTITUTION:
The Constitution of any normal State
lays down the rules and institutional
framework for making laws, but it
leaves the ideological content of those
laws to political debate between parties
of the Left, Right and Centre.
The
EU Constitution is different in that while it lays down decision-making
rules, it also lays down an economic
ideology, which those rules must
implement.
This is economic neo-liberalism mixed
with the corporatist traditions of
Big States like Germany and France,
whose population size would give them
disproportionate influence on EU
law-making under the new voting system
proposed in the Constitution.
Article III-185 makes the deflationary
economic policy of the European Central
Bank constitutionally mandatory
and has contributed to the high unemployment levels of the continental
eurozone economies.
Article III-166 would permit the EU to
decide by majority vote
what counts as a public service, which
could affect health, education and
cultural services, as the
Constitution makes "liberalisation" of services
constitutionally mandatory (Art.III-147).
Article III-156 provides that
there shall be no control on the
movement of capital either within the
Union or between the Union and the rest
of the world, although such
controls may be called for on occasion
to serve the public interest.
The Stability and Growth Pact, which imposes
rules on national budgets, has
been regularly flouted by the Big States but has led to smaller States like
Portugal and Ireland being censured (Art.III-194).
POSITIVE THINGS IN THE CONSTITUTION:
One positive change is that the Council
of Ministers must meet in public
when deliberating and voting on draft
EU laws, but the negotiating and
bargaining leading up to the laws would
still be in private (Art.I-24).
A
second change is that national Parliaments must be told of new laws the
Commission proposes. If one-third of
the 25 Parliaments think these laws
go too far, they can object. The Commission must then review its proposal,
but
can still decide to go ahead with it
(Protocol No.2 on Subsidiarity).
As David Heathcoat-Amory MP, one of the two House of
Commons representatives on the Convention, said of this provision: "This
is not new; we can object already. It is certainly not a power, as we can
object all we like, and
the Commission can go on ignoring us. All that we get in this Constitution is
a new right to be ignored."
A
third change
is that one million EU citizens could petition the Commission to propose a new
EU law to the Council of Ministers, but neither the Commission nor
Council need accede to such a
petition (Art.I-47).
A fourth change is that the
Constitution would permit a Member State to withdraw from the new Union, a
provision that has featured in other Federal Constitutions, although the
arrangements for doing so here would tend to discourage withdrawals (Art.I-60).
These
are positive proposals, but they could all be introduced without setting up a
new European Union in the form of a Federal European State, as described in
Point 1 above.
THE ALTERNATIVE TO THE CONSTITUTION
Far from being a "tidying-up
exercise" of existing treaties and powers, as
governments claim, this constitutional proposal
adds up to a fundamental
change in the nature of the EU.
In this new Union in Federal constitutional form,
the Member States would substantially lose their national independence and
democracy and would find themselves reduced to provincial or regional status.
If the proposed Constitution is
rejected, the EU will continue on the
basis of the Treaty of Nice, with the voting arrangements that treaty laid down
for a EU of 27 States. The
Convention that drafted the Constitution failed to do the job it was set up to
do by the Laeken Declaration.
By
saying No to this EU Constitution citizens can force a proper debate on the
kind of Europe that people really want - a more democratic EU, and the
restoration of powers from Brussels to the Member States, as was mooted in the Laeken
Declaration that established the Convention.
The Convention on the Future of Europe should
be recalled, put on a more democratic basis and told to make proposals for a EU
of this kind.
That would be a Europe with
National Parliaments and citizens in
the lead, not the tiny but powerful political and bureaucratic elites who are
pushing this Constitution at national and supranational levels because it gives
them personally more power.
ABOLISHING SOME 60 MORE NATIONAL VETOES
There are some 60 articles in
the proposed Constitution that would
either give the EU new powers to make laws and take decisions by
qualified
majority voting (QMV), or would abolish
a veto Member States currently have over EU laws in particular policy areas by
moving from unanimity to
majority vote.
Each
veto lost increases the powers of the 25-member Council of Ministers in their
capacity as EU legislators and decision-makers, as well as the powers of the
non-elected Commission by extending its monopoly in proposing supranational
legislation.
This
abolition of 60 further national vetoes would be a more extensive transfer
of new powers to the EU than the 35 areas in which national Parliaments and
citizens lost their right to legislate under the 2003 Treaty of Nice, or
the 19 areas lost under the 1998 Treaty of Amsterdam.
EU Governments should be urged to publish a
detailed White Paper listing and describing these fully.
The following are 49 of the more
important vetoes lost. There are some 15
other less important ones. The numbers
of the existing Union Treaty (TEU)
or Community Treaty (TEC) Articles, which the proposed changes refer to, are
given in brackets where relevant.
* * * NEW POLICY POWERS GIVEN
TO THE NEW EUROPEAN UNION * * *
1. DELEGATING LAW-MAKING POWERS TO
THE COMMISSION to issue regulations for implementing "non-essential
elements" of EU legislation (Art.1-36). The Council decides what is
essential and non-essential.
2. THE ESCALATOR OR "PASSERELLE
CLAUSE" whereby all Part III provision of the Treaty-cum-Constitution
that require unanimity may be switched to qualified majority vote by unanimous
agreement of the European Council of Presidents and Prime Ministers, as long as
a national Parliament does not object and the European Parliament agrees -
military and defence matters excepted (Art.IV-444).
3. ELECTING THE NEW PRESIDENT OF THE
EUROPEAN COUNCIL of Presidents and Prime Ministers, effectively the
EU Head of State, for up to five years by qualified majority vote (Art.I-22).
4. DECIDING THE NUMBER AND ROTATION
SCHEME OF THE LAW-MAKING COUNCIL OF
MINISTERS AND THEIR PRESIDENCIES;
at present six-monthly but expected to
change (Art.I-24).
5. ELECTING THE NEW UNION MINISTER
FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS to "conduct the
Union's common foreign
and security policy"(Art.I-28).
6. FOREIGN POLICY IMPLEMENTING
DECISIONS on the basis of the strategic
policies and positions of the European
Council of Presidents and Prime
Ministers adopted unanimously, or based
on proposals of the EU Minister
for Foreign Affairs (Art.III-300).
7. CREATING A EUROPEAN EXTERNAL
ACTION SERVICE (EU diplomatic corps), whose
organisation and functioning will
be based on proposals by the EU
Minister
for Foreign Affairs (Art.III-296).
8. URGENT FINANCIAL AID TO THIRD
COUNTRIES (Art.III-320).
9. HUMANITARIAN AID TO THIRD
COUNTRIES within the framework of the external action of the Union,
including the establishment of a European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps (Art.III-321).
10. STATUTE, SEAT AND OPERATIONAL
RULES OF THE EUROPEAN DEFENCE AGENCY, an
"agency in the field of defence
capabilities development, research,
acquisition and armaments"(Art.III-311).
>
11. ESTABLISHING MILITARY SUB-GROUPS
empowered to make special military arrangements among themselves, establish
EU "battle-groups" and undertake military missions abroad
"in accordance with the principle of a single set of forces" without
involving other EU members (Protocol No.23, recitals); to be known as
"permanent structured cooperation"(Art.III-312).
12. IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES UNDER
THE TERRORISM AND DISASTER SOLIDARITY
CLAUSE (Art.I-43), including
terrorist prevention but excluding measures
with defence implications, which
require unanimity (Art.III-329).
13. MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF LEGAL
JUDGEMENTS AND EVALUATION OF MEMBER
STATES' IMPLEMENTATION OF UNION POLICIES IN THE AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND
JUSTICE (Art.III-260).
14. PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA BY EU INSTITUTIONS AND MEMBER STATES WHEN
IMPLEMENTING EU LAW, which under
the Constitution would encompass police
and justice matters, and foreign policy
matters (Art.I-51; ex-Art.286TEC).
15. DEFINITION OF CRIMINAL OFFENCES
AND SANCTIONS FOR SERIOUS CRIME WITH A
CROSS-BORDER DIMENSION, for
which EU laws may lay down minimum rules
(Art.III-271).
16. EU LAWS ON CRIME PREVENTION TO
PROMOTE AND SUPPORT THE ACTION OF
MEMBERS STATES IN THIS FIELD
(Art.III-272).
17. MEASURES TO STRENGTHEN THE
COORDINATION AND SURVEILLANCE OF BUDGETARY
DISCIPLINE FOR THE EUROZONE COUNTRIES
AND TO SET OUT ECONOMIC POLICY
GUIDELINES FOR THEM. Euro-currency
members would have no veto and non-euro
members would not have a vote
(Art.III-194).
18. DECIDING ON UNIFIED
REPRESENTATION FOR EUROZONE MEMBERS IN
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL BODIES AND
CONFERENCES (Art.III-196; some overlap
with ex-Art.111TEC).
19. APPOINTING A PRESIDENT OF THE
EUROZONE FINANCE MINISTERS FOR TWO AND A
HALF YEARS "pending the
euro becoming the currency of all Member States of the Union"(Protocol
No.12).
20. PUBLIC HEALTH INCENTIVE MEASURES:
European laws may be made by majority vote "to establish incentive
measures designed to protect and improve
public health and in particular to
combat the major cross-border health
scourges, as well as measures which
have as their direct objective the
protection of public health regarding
tobacco and the abuse of alcohol,
excluding any harmonisation of the laws
and regulations of the Member
States"(Art.III-278.5;
ex-Art.152TEC).
21. EUROPEAN SPACE POLICY
AND PROGRAMME (Art.III-254).
22. EUROPEAN ENERGY POLICY: EU
laws to ensure functioning of the energy market and security of energy supply,
promote energy efficiency and saving
and the development of new and
renewable forms of energy, with possibly
significant implications for national
budgets, e.g. energy reserve
requirements (Art.III-256).
23. TOURISM: EU laws to
complement action by the Member States to promote
the competitiveness of Union
undertakings in the tourism sector, encourage a favourable environment for
their development, and promote exchanges of good practice between Member States
(Art.III-281).
24. SPORT: A new policy
area is given to the EU here, in addition to
"Education, Youth and Vocational
Training" where incentive measures may already be adopted by QMV
(Art.III-282): "The Union shall contribute to the promotion of
European sporting issues, while taking account of the specific nature of sport,
its structures based on voluntary activity and its social
and educational function."
EU laws "shall establish incentive
measures, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the
Member States."
The
25-Member Council shall also adopt recommendations. "Union
action shall be aimed at S developing the European dimension in sport, by
promoting fairness and openness in sporting competitions and cooperation
between bodies responsible for sports,
and by protecting the physical and
moral integrity of sportsmen and
sportswomen, especially young sportsmen and sportswomen."
25. CIVIL PROTECTION:” Union
action shall aim to support and complement Member States' action at national,
regional and local level in risk
preventions" and promote
operational cooperation within the Union between
national civil-protection
services.
EU
laws in this area could allow EU
powers to spill over and affect
national emergency services more
generally (Art.III-284).
26. PUBLIC SERVICE TRAINING COURSES
AND EXCHANGES directed at improving civil service administrative capacities
at national level for implementing Union laws. Member States would not be
obliged to avail of such support (Art.III-285).
27. EUROPEAN INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS: EU laws to provide uniform intellectual property rights
throughout the EU and set up "centralised Union-wide authorisation,
coordination and supervision arrangements"
(Art.III-176). Majority voting may also replace
unanimity in conferring
jurisdiction on the Court of Justice in
this area (Art.III-364; ex-Art.229aTEC).
28. VOLUNTARY WITHDRAWAL FROM THE
UNION (Art.I-60): The Union's terms for the withdrawal agreement would be
negotiated by majority vote among the remaining members, with the withdrawing
State excluded.
* * *
* * * EXISTING POLICY AREAS
WHERE
THE CONSTITUTION WOULD REPLACE
UNANIMITY
BY MAJORITY VOTE FOR MAKING EUROPEAN LAWS
* * *
29. DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR PROTECTION FOR
EU CITIZENS (Arts.I-10 and
III-127; ex-Art.20TEC).
30. DEFINITION OF PUBLIC SERVICES,
known as "services of general economic interest”, where majority voting
could decide what counts as a public service and the boundaries between public
and private elements therein
(Art.III-122; ex-Art.16TEC). See
also Articles III-147 and 148 on
liberalisation of services.
31. TRADE AGREEMENTS IN SERVICES AND
THE COMMERCIAL ASPECTS OF
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY under the Common
Commercial Policy, including agreements covering social, health and
education services, unless Member States can prove that such agreements would
"risk seriously disturbing the national organisation of such services and
prejudicing the responsibility of Member States to deliver them" (Arts.III-315;
ex-Art.133TEC).
Trade agreements in cultural and audiovisual
services become subject to QMV unless they "risk prejudicing the Union's
cultural and linguistic diversity".
Article
III-315
opens the way for the EU to use trade agreements in services to pressurise less
developed countries to abolish national controls on foreign investment as well
as on their health, education and cultural services, and encourage
privatisation of the latter in such countries.
32. SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT
WORKERS, which could spill over in ECJ case law and affect social security
systems generally (Art.III-136; ex-Art.42TEC).
33. RULES FOR EXERCISING THE
IMPLEMENTING POWERS OF THE COMMISSION (Art.I-37; ex-Arts.10 and 202TEC).
34. LAW ON SELF-EMPLOYMENT AND
MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF
QUALIFICATIONS, something that
could also spill over and affect wider
employment law (Art.III-141; ex-Art.47TEC).
35. IMPLEMENTING MEASURES FOR THE
EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA, which is designed to coordinate scientific research
in the EU (Art.III-251.4; ex-Art.166TEC).
36. JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL
MATTERS: EU laws to govern mutual recognition of judgements and judicial
decisions relating to cross-border crime, and the approximation of laws and
regulations of Member States
relating to police and judicial matters
with a cross-border dimension, including rules on the admissibility of
evidence, the rights of individuals in criminal procedure and the rights of
victims of
crime (Art.III-270; ex-Art.31TEU).
37. EU LAWS INCREASING THE POWERS OF
EUROJUST, which links Member State prosecuting authorities, including the
initiation of criminal investigations, proposing the initiation of
prosecutions and the coordination of such investigations and
prosecutions (Art.III-273;
ex-Art.31TEU).
38. EU LAWS TO ENHANCE
CROSS-NATIONAL POLICE COOPERATION, including "the
collection, storage, processing, analysis
and exchange of relevant information", and supporting staff training
and exchanges etc. (Art.III-275; ex-Art.30TEU).
39. EU LAWS TO DETERMINE EUROPOL'S
STRUCTURE, OPERATION, FIELD OF ACTION
AND TASKS, including the
collection and processing of information and "the
coordination, organisation and
implementation of investigative and
operational action carried out jointly
with the Member States' competent
authorities or in the context of
joint investigative teams"(Art.III-276; ex-Art.30TEU).
40. COMBATING FINANCIAL FRAUD
AGAINST THE
UNION (Art.III-415; ex-Art.280TEC):
The Constitution proposes to expand the
scope of European laws in this area, which is already decided by QMV, to cover
relevant national criminal law by deleting the phrase in the present treaty
that measures against fraud "shall not concern the application of
national criminal law or the national administration of justice".
41. BORDER CONTROLS (Arts.III-265
and 268;ex-Art.62TEC);
42. COMMON ASYLUM POLICY
(Art.III-266 and 268;ex-Arts.63-64TEC);
43. COMMON IMMIGRATION POLICY
(Arts.III-267 and 268;ex-Art.63 TEC);
44. CULTURE: majority voting to
replace unanimity for incentive measures
on many aspects of cultural policy, excluding any harmonisation of the laws
and regulations of Member States.
"Action by the Union shall be aimed at
encouraging cooperation between Member
States and, if necessary,
supporting and complementing their action in the following areas:
(a)
Improvement in the knowledge and dissemination of the culture and history of
the European peoples;
(b)
Conservation and safeguarding of cultural heritage of European significance;
(c)
Non-commercial cultural exchanges;
(d)
Artistic and literary creation, including in the audiovisual sector"(Art.III-280;
ex-Art.151TEC).
45. CHANGES TO VARIOUS POWERS OF THE
EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK relating to
open market and credit operations, setting minimum reserve requirements, fining
financial institutions, conducting foreign exchange operations and
regulating bank clearance systems.
The
changes give the Commission the right to propose that they be made by QMV,
whereas previously only the Bank itself could propose that (Art.III-187.3;
Protocol No.4; ex-Art.107TEC).
46. APPOINTING THE EXECUTIVE BOARD
OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL
BANK (Art.III-382; ex-Art.112TEC).
This important group, consisting of the
President, Vice-President and four
others, runs the day-to-day operations
of the Bank.
The
Constitution substitutes appointment by majority vote for appointment "by
common accord" of the EU Presidents and Prime Ministers.
47. AMENDING THE STATUTE OF THE
EUROPEAN COURT OF
JUSTICE (Art.III-381; ex-Art.245
TEC).
48. ADVISORY PANEL FOR CHOOSING
CANDIDATES FOR JUDGES AND
ADVOCATES-GENERAL OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE, the operating rules for which
would be laid down
by majority vote, which could mean less
say by Member States over how ECJ
judges are chosen (Art.III-357;
ex-Art.223 TEC).
49. IMPLEMENTING MEASURES FOR THE
UNION'S OWN RESOURCES SYSTEM (Art.I-54;
ex-Art.269TEC).
End ... February 2005
*
* *
*
|
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
*
Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
SAY VOTERS
by
Daniel Martin
Political Reporter
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the
controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last
week's
IRISH REFERENDUM'
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in
the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
RATIFICATION OF THE
TREATY.
And
10,000 people
have signed a
PETITION
on the
DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE
within the past few days
JUNE16-2008
, calling on the
GOVERNMENT
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
Downing Street website is
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/
*
JUNE 18-2008
|
*
*
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138
*
Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the
absolute necessity of a
REFERENDUM
HEAR HIM ON
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
*
*
13th October,2007
So You Want Out Of The EU
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the
people of Britain were given
DUAL CITIZENSHIP
-both
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon
the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed
the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The
GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with
BRITISH DOCUMENTATION
-only such as British (not EU) passports,
driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER
08]
*
| |
|
|
| |
CHRISTMAS
SPECIAL!
A BLUNT REPLY TO THE
QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th
DECEMBER ,2007.
*
TIME
FOR DECISION
THE BRITISH
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY
MATTER.
*
The Act of
Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN
-YOU!
*
The Common Law of
ENGLAND is the LAW of
THE COMMONWEALTH
and AMERICA
*
The
Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for
Europe- 4-PARTS
*
MESSAGE FROM
AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
*
WHY WE MUST BE
ALERT AND WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS
MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY
*
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE
LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
Will
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU
HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A
PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
OR
WILL
THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE
INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT
THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES
-THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
WE BELIEVE
THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER
HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
THIS
CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR
OF THE
'Rights and Liberties'
of
Englishmen
Will keep
by HER SACRED OATH
or the
MONARCHY be nothing more than a
THEME
PARK in the future
THIS IS
THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY
EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN
DIRE PERIL.
We are told on the BBC (Brussels
Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on
Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the
QUEEN now has a website which has footage of
the Royal Family in the past and that the
QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
Well! as
far as many patriotic subjects are concerned
we need to remain in the PAST when it
concerns the protection of our
FREEDOM
and COUNTRY.
Change we
have had and will continue to have but it
must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our
Common Law of England and all which makes
our country the most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
THERE CAN
BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to protect our
inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall
have to fight for a REPUBLIC as
happened in the 17th century because the
Monarch of the day ignored those very
'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which
will still survive in the English Speaking
World today in December 2007. How can the
MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is
already our and our children's
INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the above publicity
exercise is to be used to soften the impact to
the population of the BETRAYAL of their
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be
the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since
James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH
for MONEY and RELIGION.
WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND
LIBERTIES WORTH?
THEY ARE PRICELESS!
*
*
The
Choice is Yours!-but time is running out
FAST!
6 months to be EXACT!
*
THE EU
WE-AND THEM!
WE are to
join THEM
THEY are not
joining US
WE have more to LOSE
THEY have
more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE
for most of our HISTORY
THEY have
been cursed with that abomination for most
of their HISTORY and NOW!
*
Our Queen and the EU Constitution
*
The Spirit of England
by
Winston Churchill
*
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
*
MESSAGE TO
HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II
*
We now learn
from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve
that the Queen's Speech will cover the
catastrophic fall in Values and Moral
behaviour since the beginning of her 56
-year reign. This has been brought about by
the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater
number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have
placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS
of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.
As for
the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has
been the direct result of the actions of HER
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS
POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56 years of HER
MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their
aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN
POWER.
The reason
for the marked drop in the number viewing
THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the
mass of people have realised years ago that
the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their
WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED
THEM CORRECT.
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it the case on
Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch
talks our Rights and Liberties are
being taken from us under our very
noses?
Of course the QUEEN
under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only
'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when
the matter concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY
consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as
it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME
IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our
inherited Rights and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE
AWAY.
We as loyal
subjects of the MONARCH who is the living
embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES
ask at this late stage with only months to
the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some
veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will
PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the
MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most
crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter
should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's
responsibility it is to CARE for their
FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of
CHRISTMAS.
IF HER
MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded
we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of
HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR
has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
Should this
APPEAL not be answered we can at last
confirm that the MONARCHY is after all
nothing more than a talking shop suitable
for YouTube and therefore nothing more than
a
THEME PARK
*
Hear Tony
Benn's comments about the despotic and
corrupt
EUROPEAN
UNION
and the
need for a
REFERENDUM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
From a
politician with INTEGRITY and love of
country who has for decades witnessed the
growth of the monstrous creature soon to be
a
UNITED
STATES OF EUROPE.
*
Liberties of Parliament-
Birthright of Subjects of England.
*
[All words/word underlined have a
separate bulletin] |
|
| |
|
|
|
A
CHRISTMAS MESSAGE
TO
ALL OUR
VIEWERS.
WE WISH YOU ALL A
HAPPY
CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY
NEW YEAR
IN
2008
[Since our
Xmas message to you all last year we find
that our sentiments remain the same with the
added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR
COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR
HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR
COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]
We Remember The
Year 2006
The
Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953
[We
were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of
our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had
taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just
THAT while everyone had their minds they
thought on more important matters. Well! in
2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is
leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the
final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year
PROTECTOR of our inherited
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN
HER
MAJESTY-THE QUEEN
Of the House
of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd
and Darling of England' in the annals of 893
-897
'We still
leave it to the work of
Alfred the Great
that
England was saved to become the first
individual nation -state which over 1100
years later a member of that same House of
Wessex has already signed away much of those
ancient Rights and Liberties and
fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and
only awaits a final signature to enslave her
people into a despotic undemocratic godless
police state to call itself a
UNITED STATES
OF EUROPE
It is
within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to
refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because
whatever lies her ministers have given her
over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear
for ALL TO SEE.
In the
Netherlands a number of years ago their
MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign
the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY
is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200
years in the making. It is the treasonable
actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed
THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection
of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS
as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.
GOD SAVE
THE QUEEN
*
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
*
A
WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND
by
Harry Beckhough
[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]
2004
*
'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'
-NOT any MORE
THE EU OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL
PORTRAY ITSELF AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD
'Don't tell the voters-or you will ruin everything '
"...we have to make sure that there are no discussions
taking place in the open air"
Guenter Burghardt, a former EU
ambassador to the US, warning that details of the new EU diplomatic
service (officially to be known as the External Action Service) should
not be discussed in public before the
UK PARLIAMENT
had ratified the NEW EU TREATY
and Ireland has held its TREATY REFERENDUM early next
summer (source: EU Observer on 27th November ,2007
The EU
has also stated that none of its institutions should rock the boat until
the English have ratified their TREATY.
Over the
next few months you will hear more than ever the wonderful benefits of
the EU. Whether it is Global warming or whatever they feel shows them in
a good light and when you have swallowed the bait you will not know what
has hit you. They intend to show how reasonable they are and that they
are there to make you happy. If you all fall for this con-trick then you
will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store for
YOU!
Referendum: how Labour could
still smell of roses.
and
'Money
to spare'
when we
leave the EU in 2008?
Open Europe
says:
or
or
or
Cut petrol duty by 75 per cent
or
Pay the total bill for the London Olympics in
less than a year
AND MUCH MORE
Commons debate on the European Communities
(Finance) Bill on Monday 19th November,2007.
REFERENDUM DAY
will be
RECOMPENCE DAY?
*
A TIME FOR
EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING
VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.
|
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
VOTE
MAY -2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
Home Rule for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
MAY/07
[All underlined words have a separate
bulletin]
*