- (1994 -Official Website - JUNE -PT 1-2018 )--

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018          JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018          JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018          JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

*  *  *

'The Longest Day'
D-DAY, 6th June 1944.

WHAT WE SAID ON 6TH JUNE 2004
 

'To some of us it seems only yesterday when those countless warriors for Freedom left our shores to fight to Free the peoples of a war- torn Europe...'

Many of those taking part were from the other parts of the English Speaking World the Commonwealth and other nation states that joined the Free World to fight the tripartite evil of State Dominance of Peoples, which is shortly again to be upon us in the form of the new European Constitution.

For those returning to the battle fields of Europe it must be in their minds as to how after all that had taken place 60 years ago that the one Nation that faced the terror almost alone -a unique Democracy an example to the world from which seed of Freedom rose, those Free Independent Nations States throughout the world during the past three centuries, is now fighting for its survival from traitors within.

Today our nation is now itself in peril from a doctrine alien to its nature but well known across our moat of history for it's emphasis on order by the State rather than our centuries old lesson that the State is our servant - not our master.

There is an awakening taking place of the dangers to our way-of-life but whether it will be in time to save us in the short time we remain a truly Free Nation State only the People can decide.

On June 6th 2004 all our thoughts will be with those who lost loved ones and those that suffered at home and abroad to bring Peace and Prosperity back to a war weary world. May we escape the present evil, which threatens to enslave our People and Country- God Save Our Queen!

May God save our Queen and our Country?

6th June-2004

 

WE ASK! IN JUNE 2015 WHAT HAVE YOU DONE! TO PREVENT OUR UNIQUE 1000 YEAR PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY AND ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE FROM BECOMING A REGION OF THE 1943 NAZI-PLANNED EUROPEAN UNION?

THE GREATER NUMBER OF YOU!

DID

ABSOLUTELY

NOTHING!

 

6th June,2015

*

 

Added January 2016*

Unfortunately the QUEEN failed to RESIGN rather than  DISHONOUR HER SACRED CORONATION OATH  which should  have protected our Ancient Law-Custom and Constitution - now subservient to the 1942 Nazi-planned domination of EUROPE under its true colours as a COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC

EUROPEAN UNION

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

 

 

H.F.6TH OF JUNE.

*  *  *

 
PATRIOTIC

PATRIOTIC

WETHERSPOON

DITCHES BOOZE FROM EU

BY HOLLY BLACK

DAILY MAIL

 

PUB chain WETHERSPOON

 is to

STOP SELLING WINE AND BEER

FROM

FRANCE and GERMANY

AHEAD OF

BREXIT

It will focus on offering more beverages from the UK and non EU producers across its 880 from JULY 9,2018.

Champagne and German wheat beers will be switched for English sparkling wine and craft beers in the run-up to leaving the EU.

But Kopparberg cider, which is currently made in Sweden, will stay stocked after the Swedish firm said it will switch production to the UK.

JD Wetherspoon chairman Tim Martin said:

'This is the start of a review of all our products in the next six to 24 months, with the object of making our business more competitive.'

He said tariffs imposed by the 'protectionist' EU were keeping prices high for UK consumers.

Some 2million people visit Wetherspoon pubs every week

The group sells more than 6million bottles of Kopparberg and 2million bottles of sparkling wine and prosecco every year, but fewer than 100,000 bottles of champagne are bought at its pubs.

In place of French fizz, the pubs will offer UK sparkling wine brands Denbies and Whitedowns as well as Australian Hardy wines. Meanwhile UK brewed wheat beers Blue Moon,Belguim White, Thornbridge Versa Weisse and mSA Braines Atlantic White will replace German brands such as Erdinger.

Russ Mould, investment director at saving firm AJ Bell, said

'Tim Martin's strong held political views are well known and you have to respect anyone's ability to stick to their principles so firmly.

'Excluding popular brands of drinks based on their country of origin seems an unusual move for a firm which you would think wants to be seen as inclusive and welcoming to customers of all views and beliefs, but Mr Martin knows his customers and has successfully built the firm by providing

VALUE FOR MONEY.

Mr Martin said Brexit would create big marking opportunities for UK and non-EU producers, which the pub group is keen to encourage.

The Wetherspoon chairman added: 'The products awe are introducing are at a lower prices than EU products they are replacing.

'We intend to honour existing contracts with EU suppliers some of which have several years to run, but we are starting to make the transition to

NON-EU TRADE

NOW.

 [CHEERS!-MR MARTIN]

*

JUNE 14-2018

 

 

 

 

    News for daily mail newspaper uk


    The Independent
    Daily Mail reversing Brexit stance 'would be editorial and commercial suicide', Dacre warns new editor
    The Independent - 22 hours ago
    It would be “editorial and commercial suicide" for the Daily Mail to reverse its pro-
    Brexit stance, the newspaper's editor Paul Dacre has ... He is known to be a keen
    supporter of Britain remaining part of the European Union.
 

JUNE 14,2018

THE DAILY MAIL

HAVING TAKEN UP THE BANNER OF ENGLISH FREEDOM BEFORE THE PEOPLE'S REFERENDUM RESULT IN JUNE 2016 COULD NOT DESERT THE FIELD OF COMBAT AND HAND OVER THAT BANNER TO OUR TREACHEROUS ENEMIES MONTHS BEFORE OUR EXPECTED EXIT FROM THE EU ON MARCH 29-2019. TO DO SO WOULD BE A GRAVE MISTAKE WHICH WOULD HAUNT THE DAILY MAIL AND THE FREE PRESS-THE FOURTH ESTATE OF THE REALM AT SUCH A CRITICAL AND MOMENTOUS MOMENT IN THE HISTORY OF ENGLAND. WE HOPE-WE EXPECT-THAT THE NEW EDITOR OF THE  DAILY MAIL WILL TAKE UP THE  PEOPLE'S NATIONAL BANNER OF A FREE NATION STATE TO ENSURE THAT THE BATTLE OF SORTS WHICH OVER  47 YEARS HAS BEEN FOUGHT, IS BROUGHT TO AN END ON INDEPENDENCE DAY-

MARCH 29, 2018.

*

 WE HOPE THAT MR MARTIN'S EXAMPLE WILL BE FOLLOWED BY MANY OTHERS WHO WANT THEIR COUNTRY BACK FROM HITLER'S PLANNED AND PLANTED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION WHICH IN REALITY IS AN ELITIST CESS-PIT OF GREED AND EVIL- A GODLESS - POWER HUNGRY

BEAST! 

IN ITS

TOWER OF BABEL

 

 ITS SWIFT DEMISE WILL BRING A FRESH BREATH OF LIFE TO THOSE WHO VALUE THEIR FREEDOM  COUNTRY -CUSTOM-CONSTITUTION.]

*

Unfortunately, the Godless European Union does have associations with 'The Beast' . It cannot be a coincidence that a massive Brussels-based computer called EURO NET, capable of storing all the personal data of the world's entire population, is nicknamed 'The Beast'.  The disturbing motif of the wanton women riding a modified beast from the Book of Revelations, Chapter 17, verse 3, is in widespread use throughout the EU -for instance, in wall paintings in the European Parliament at Strasbourg, on a German five deutschemark note pre-dating the political collective from 1948, on a British postage stamp dated 1984 commemorating the Second European Parliamentary 'Elections' , in the form of an unattractive sculpture located immediately outside the European Council building, on a German ECU coin dated 1992, and on a recent German telephone card.

And everywhere is to be seen EU's ubiquitous circle of 12 stars, which the ignorant comfort themselves by believing that they represent the crown of Mary (symbolism derived from Revelation, Chapter 12 , verse 1.)  In reality, the 12 stars are an attribute of the pagan 'Queen of Heaven', a name given to the mother of Nimrod (meaning, in Chaldean,' the horned one'), the builder and ruler of Babel.  the hideous new circular European Parliament building in Strasbourg is modelled upon Pieter Breughel's famous painting called 'The Tower of Babel', replicated in the Council of Europe's notorious poster. Symbology, which is much too large a subject to be dealt with adequately here, is a crucial component of the occult focus of all such man-orientated collectivist 'New World Social Order' constructions - the EU belong a conspicuous consumer of such neo-pagan symbolism.  But the occult underlying nature and motivation of the EUROPEAN UNION is not an issue that concerns the EU political and policy-making classes, which are measured by economics and ideology...

In any case, not a single politician belonging to or supporting successive British Conservative Government nor (much less surprisingly) the fellow travelling British Fabian Socialist Government (which, given its political orientation, shares the objectives of Lenin's World Revolution but proceeds towards these objectives by stealth, just like the European Union Collective itself...

 

PART 2

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 A PATRIOT AND MAN OF TRUTH.

 

 
earches related to DEATH OF CHRISTOPHER STORY

christopher story books

christopher's story

christopher story disappearance

christopher story new castle

christopher story youtube

christopher story eu corruption

christopher story the eu our enemy

christopher story website

 

PDF] 

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

exopolitics.blogs.com/files/eu-collective.pdf

 

 

Christopher Story Assassination (Edward Harle working under the ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6A_VpB2u_o25 Apr 2011 - 15 min - Uploaded by usellcom
Prominent veteran financial journalist Edward Harle (working under the pen name Christopher ...

H.F.974/1

 

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

OCTOBER-2013

 

JANUARY 1-1973-MARCH 29,2019?

'JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED.'

 

GLADSTONE.

*

'The liberty of a people consists in being governed by laws which they have made themselves, under whatsoever form it be of government; the liberty of a private man is being master of his own time and actions, as far as may consist with the laws of God and his country.'

COWLEY.

*

  'The greatest glory of a free-born people is to transmit that freedom to their children.-

Havard.

*

The true danger is, when liberty is nibbled away, for expedients, and by parts.-

BURKE.

*

[This is what has transpired with our being in the EU since 1973 and is still happening while our extrication from captivity is being  sought under Mrs May's premiership today in June,2018.]

*  *  *

 

TO

 DM from EDP

''MISTAKE''

'Any man may make a mistake but none but a fool will continue with it.'

Cicero, Marcus Tullius (106-43 B.C. Roman orator)

*

'Meo culpa'

  *  *  *

 

 

H.F.1573/1

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JUNE 14,2018

H F 1573

*  *  *

*  *  *

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 SATURDAY JUNE 9,2018

...Could there be any more eloquent rebuke to Mrs May's critics than the public's confidence in her? And could there be any clearer warning to Tory rebels who threaten to humiliate her - and 17.4 million LEAVE VOTERS-by supporting the Lords' wreaking amendments to Brexit this week.

 Yet though Mrs May can draw comfort from the poll, she would do well to heed Boris Johnson. He will have struck a chord with millions when he argued that our negotiators could learn a thing or two from Donald Trump in their talks with the EU.

Indeed, with 64 per cent saying the Government  is handling BREXIT badly ministers need to display more courage and confidence in dealing with an obtuse and obstructive Brussels.

This country has massive leverage in the talks - as Audi's boss confirmed this week when he said he was desperate to retain free access to the UK market for his cars.

With treats if necessary, our team must spell out that Britain simply won't settle for being' locked in orbit around the EU' (to quote Mr Johnson's vivid phrase).

And if Eeyore Chancellor Philip Hammond can't understand this, then he should be replaced

BY SOMEONE WHO CAN.

[ The phrase TEAM appears to have a different interpretation with Mrs May as according to an entry in the NEW IMPERIAL REFERENCE DICTIONARY

'Team-Work-cooperation, pulling together, regard to success of the a whole rather than personal exploits.'

So Mrs May who chose

HER TEAM

is responsible for the negative progress over 2 years to date. If a football team manager chose players  who did not fit in as a team he would soon be looking for a job if he was not already with his termination notice in his hand.

AS we have explained on a number of occasions that had Churchill to retain PRO-GERMAN ministers in his CABINET in 1940 there is no doubt there would have been

 NO DUNKIRK-NO VICTORY IN THE AIR AND UNDER NAZI-GERMAN RULE.

And since Ist January 1973 we have been in HITLER'S planned so-called EUROPEAN UNION an UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-CORRUPT-GODLESS-NATION DESTROYING ENTITY which  in 2018 is being attacked from within by the growing numbers of patriots who are now longer prepared to remain servants but to recover their lost free-independent nation states. And how ENGLAND is judged in its BREXIT negotiations will not only decide OUR FUTURE but that of other captive nationalities who wish to enjoy the benefits that a FREE INDEPENDENT COUNTRY WILL BRING.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 SATURDAY JUNE 9,2018

*  *  *

 

[As we have learned in the article  H.F.1585 above the conditions agreed on the so-called WITHDRAWAL BILL are well short of what is in the minds of the Brexiteers who must be wondering what has happened to Mrs May's clarion call

BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.  24-6-18]

 

H.F.1565

*  *  *

 
 

ON THIS crunch day for democracy, with Brexit hanging in the balance, cast your mind back two years to the morning after the referendum, when Britain awoke to the sensational news that the public had voted to pull out of the European Union.

Indeed, even among the more philosophical Remain voters, there was a sense of relief that at last this great issue of our times-a running sore in the body politic for decades, causing bitter infighting in both main parties-had been resolved

After all, hadn't Remain and Leave campaigners alike stressed that the

VOTE OF THE MAJORITY WOULD BE BINDING AND FINAL?

Meanwhile, hadn't both sides spelt out repeatedly that withdrawing from the EU would mean pulling out of its principle institutions, the customs union and the single market-A PLEDGE REPEATED LAST YEAR IN THE TORY ELECTION MANIFESTO, on which every candidate for the PARTY FOUGHT?

Yet while most BRITONS (including REMAIN voters) now  only to get on with BREXIT, an obdurate ESTABLISHMENT still refuses to take LEAVE for an answer.

Indeed, far from accepting their duty to unite behind the Government in pressing for the BEST DEAL possible from BRUSSELS, die-hard REMOANERS have talked up every minor obstacle, while doing everything in their poer to frustrate BREXIT and hobble our negotiators.

worst of all have been we-know-it-best peers, cocooned in their

CHAMBER OF CROOKS

CRONIES

DODGY DONERS

AND

WASHED-UP MEMBERS OF THE POLITICAL CLASS.

In an out-and-out affront to

DEMOCRACY

they have vastly overstepped their constitutional role of scrutinising legislation to iron out anomalies, seeking instead to

DESTROY THE BREXIT BILL

altogether by voting DOWN the GOVERNMENT no fewer than 15 times.

Which brings us to today and tomorrow, when die-hard TORY REMOANERS, in unholy alliance with the utterly unscrupulous LABOUR leadership, threaten to support the Lords' wrecking  and thereby render the

REFERENDUM RESULT

-ALL BUT MEANINGLESS.

FOR MAKE NO MISTAKE. IF THE WORST OF THESE CHANGES ARE PASSED INTO LAW-SCRAPPING A FIRM DATE FOR BREXIT. HANDING PARLIAMENT THE RIGHT TO PROLONG NEGOTIATIONS INDEFINITELY AND COMMITTING THE GOVERNMENT TO PRESS FOR CONTINUED MEMBERSHIP OF THE

CUSTOMS UNION AND SINGLE MARKET-THE CONSEQUENCES FOR BRITAIN WOULD BE DISASTROUS.

*   *   *
 

PART 2 

Not only would we be left in the worst of all possible worlds, locked into EU rules on tariffs and free movement while losing any say in making them. At a stroke our negotiators would be deprived of their trump card - the threat to leave the EU without a deal, taking with us our £39 billion divorce settlement and free access to our lucrative markets which French farmers, German car-makers (including Audi, whose boss is desperate for a deal) and millions of others on the Continent depend for their livelihoods.

Meanwhile, victory for Remoaners this week would humiliate Theresa May, opening up the nightmare possibility of installing Jeremy Corbyn in Downing Street , with his Marxist henchman John McDonnell in charge of taxpayers' cash at the Treasury.

Is this a risk any Tory- even that lifelong eurofanatic stubborn old Ken Clarke-is really prepared to take?

And are Labour MP's, most of whom represent Brexit supporting seats, seriously willing to betray their constituents by siding with the unelected Lords

AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE?

Yes, Remoaners are right when they say the

BREXIT TALKS

are going badly.

But whose fault is that, when they themselves are undermining our negotiators and doing Michel Barnier's work for him?

If only our politicians would present a

UNITED FRONT

our prospects of striking a deal that right for

BRITAIN

would be vastly improved.

Indeed, the irony is that while the UK has gone from strength to strength since the

BREXIT VOTE

making nonsence of the dire predictions of

PROJECT FEAR

-the EU has seldom appeared weaker.

With rampant youth unemployment throughout the southern eurozone, and millions rising against mass immigration, ugly Right-wing parties are in the ascendant . Look at what's happening in Italy and Hungary, where nationalist governments are openly flouting

BRUSSEL'S RULE

Or for a vivid metaphor of the EU's sclerosis look at yesterday's breakdown of the £150million'gravy train' carrying MEPs from BRUSSELS to STRASBOURG.

By rights, our negotiators should be exploiting this weakness in the EU's back yard for all it's worth.

This paper fervently hopes that today and tomorrow, MPs will show

RESPECT FOR DEMOCRACY

defeat the Lords amendments and put

BREXIT

back on course.

Meanwhile, is it too much to ask politicians of all parties to display more passion for the great project on which we are embarked-and reignitethe jubilant mood of the morning of

LIBERATION

IN

JUNE 2016

*  *  *

[CHANGES OF FONT-STYLE-CAPS-ARE OURS!]

JUNE 12,2018

'The fears of one class of men [elite-self-interest'] are not the measure of the rights of another' [the plain man's love for his country-its independence-culture and history'

 Bancroft, George-(1800-91)- (American historian)

*

 

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

P.155,1.I   Nobody will be argued into slavery

'Which government the English have best preserved, being a nation too tenacious of their Libertys to be complemented out of them.'

Edmund Burke

'If we [The People] command our wealth, we shall be rich and free; if our wealth[The elite!] commands  us, we are poor indeed.'

'If you ask me what a free government is, I answer, that  for any practical purpose it is what the people think so' [As clearly expressed in June 2016]

Edmund Burke

The House of Commons at this crucial hour in the history of England must endorse the people's 'petition of right' of  June 23,2016 -and in the words of our great war leader Winston Churchill on the 10th November ,1942

'This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.'

AS

PRIME MINISTER MAY

HAS STATED:-

BREXIT MEANS BREXIT

LETS NOT WASTE ANY MORE TIME!

AND

GET THE JOB DONE WITHOUT DELAY

FOR

ENGLAND

FOR

BRITAIN

AND FOR THE

COMMONWEALTH

AND THE WORLD AT LARGE.

*

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CHANGES OF FONT-STYLE-CAPS-ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1570/1

 

H.F.1570

*  *  *

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 SATURDAY JUNE 9,2018

...Could there be any more eloquent rebuke to Mrs May's critics than the public's confidence in her? And could there be any clearer warning to Tory rebels who threaten to humiliate her - and 17.4 million LEAVE VOTERS-by supporting the Lords' wreaking amendments to Brexit this week.

 Yet though Mrs May can draw comfort from the poll, she would do well to heed Boris Johnson. He will have struck a chord with millions when he argued that our negotiators could learn a thing or two from Donald Trump in their talks with the EU.

Indeed, with 64 per cent saying the Government  is handling BREXIT badly ministers need to display more courage and confidence in dealing with an obtuse and obstructive Brussels.

This country has massive leverage in the talks - as Audi's boss confirmed this week when he said he was desperate to retain free access to the UK market for his cars.

With treats if necessary, our team must spell out that Britain simply won't settle for being' locked in orbit around the EU' (to quote Mr Johnson's vivid phrase).

And if Eeyore Chancellor Philip Hammond can't understand this, then he should be replaced

BY SOMEONE WHO CAN.

[ The phrase TEAM appears to have a different interpretation with Mrs May as according to an entry in the NEW IMPERIAL REFERENCE DICTIONARY

'Team-Work-cooperation, pulling together, regard to success of the a whole rather than personal exploits.'

So Mrs May who chose

HER TEAM

is responsible for the negative progress over 2 years to - date. If a football team manager chose players  who did not fit in as a team he would soon be looking for a job if he was not already with his termination notice in his hand.

AS we have explained on a number of occasions that had Churchill to retain PRO-GERMAN ministers in his CABINET in 1940 there is no doubt there would have been

 NO DUNKIRK-NO VICTORY IN THE AIR- AND UNDER NAZI-GERMAN RULE.

And since Ist January 1993 we have been in

HITLER'S

 planned so-called EUROPEAN UNION an UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-CORRUPT-GODLESS-NATION DESTROYING ENTITY which  in 2018 is being attacked from within by the growing numbers of patriots who are no longer prepared to remain servants but to recover their lost free-independent nation states. And how ENGLAND is judged in its BREXIT negotiations will not only decide OUR FUTURE but that of other captive nationalities who wish to enjoy the benefits that a FREE INDEPENDENT COUNTRY WILL BRING.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 SATURDAY JUNE 9,2018
 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

***

TREASON

 

 

H.F.1565

*  *  *

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Leaving the European Union is taking longer than it did to defeat Hitler and his Nazi Germany

732

View
comments

What right does Soros have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy?

Two years down the drain. Two years of vacillation, obfuscation, cowardice, sabotage and outright betrayal. And that's just from our own Government.

 

On June 23, 2016, in a referendum, 17.4 million people voted to leave the European Union.

No ifs, no buts.

The question on the ballot paper was unambiguous, the so-called catastrophic consequences spelled out in plain English in a brochure distributed to every single home in the country by a Government which was desperate to Remain.

Campaigning was exhaustive, lasting six whole months. We knew exactly what voting Leave would mean. 

 

No single market, no customs union,

 no more submitting to the jurisdiction of European courts. 

Recent developments could mean leaving the European Union will take longer than it did to defeat Hitler and Nazi Germany, writes Richard Littlejohn

We would be retaking control of our borders, our laws, our traditional territorial waters and our national destiny.

Project Fear did its worst and failed. More people voted Leave than have ever voted for anything in our history. By now, we should be as good as gone, with only a few minor details to be ironed out.

Yet two years on, just as I feared, we're no nearer the exit. Every day seems to bring yet another blatant attempt to derail the process, to keep us subjugated in perpetuity as prisoners of a sclerotic, anti-democratic European superstate.

The latest comes from a group bankrolled by the billionaire hedge funder George Soros, a Hungarian-born American who made his fortune betting against the pound on Black Wednesday in 1992.

Having earned the nickname of the Man Who Broke The Bank Of England, he is now determined to become The Man Who Broke The Will Of The British People.

What right does Soros have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy?

Yet the same people here who are squealing about Russia meddling in the U.S. election (because that delivered the 'wrong' result, too) are cheering him on.

This self-appointed fifth column will stop at nothing to overturn the referendum result. The stitch-up started the moment the result was announced.

We've had endless legal challenges, and the disgraceful attempts by the unelected, self-serving Lords to stop Brexit.

Project Fear — far from admitting it lost fair and square, packing up its tent and going home —has been ramping up the volume, aided and abetted by the BBC, the Financial Times and the political establishment.

The head of Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, John Thompson, joined in this week, warning that technology designed to keep trade flowing seamlessly after Brexit would cost businesses £20 billion and take at least three years to introduce after the proposed 'transition' period is due to end.

 

What right does [George] Soros (pictured) have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy? Asks Richard Littlejohn

Such a delay would keep us in the customs union until December 2023. That's seven years after we voted Leave — longer than it took us to defeat Nazi Germany.

Thompson obviously hadn't read Robert Hardman's brilliant dispatch in last Saturday's Mail from the port of Felixstowe, where a comparable system works without a hitch and could easily be applied elsewhere, including the Irish border.

The governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, a siren voice of Project Fear, waded back in by claiming every British family would be 'up to potentially' £900 a year worse off after Brexit.

What does 'up to potentially' actually mean? I'll tell you — he made it up. It's a guess, pure and simple. This figure is about as accurate as all the other scaremongering forecasts the Bank put out during the referendum.

Carney, a Canadian, is one of the worst of the Remoaner stooges. He's supposed to be independent, but owes his job to the political establishment. 

He maintains Brexit will be a retrograde step, an economic disaster, but at the same time is said to harbour ambitions of becoming the next Prime Minister of proudly independent Canada.

So let him explain something. This time last year, I was sitting in a waterfront seafood restaurant on the Detroit River, looking across at Windsor, Ontario.

The distance from the U.S. to Canada at this point is about the width of the Thames at Dartford. 

The governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, a siren voice of Project Fear, waded back in by claiming every British family would be 'up to potentially' £900 a year worse off after Brexit

Every day thousands of trucks trundle across the border in either direction, carrying imports and exports of everything from car components to Canadian bacon.

If Carney does stand as PM, will he tell his fellow countrymen that all this trade will have to stop unless they agree to be ruled by America, have their laws decided in Washington and surrender the right to decide who lives in their country? Of course not.

So why should the prosperity of Britain, the world's fifth biggest economy, be determined by whether or not we belong to the EU and take orders from Brussels? 

Look, we expect Remoaners to insult our intelligence, tell us we were too stupid to know what we were voting for, and fight to the last ditch to stop us leaving.

We just have to live with it, although I can do without the constant bombardment of anti-Brexit lies and intimidation masquerading as 'news' which seems to dominate every TV and radio bulletin.

Labour is a lost cause, too. Despite promising in its last manifesto to respect the Brexit vote, Labour is now only interested in bringing down the Government — even if that means betraying the millions of traditional Labour supporters who voted Leave.

My biggest worry all along has been the Tory Government itself, even before Theresa May sacrificed her majority in that vainglorious General Election last year.

Regular readers will know I'm no fan of Mother Theresa. I thought Boris deserved the job when Call Me Dave committed hara-kiri. 

He was the figurehead for the Leave campaign and the spoils should have gone to the victor.

Theresa May's (pictured) inherent indecision, which has characterised her career, has enabled the opponents of Brexit to seize the initiative at every turn

If he'd screwed up, we'd be no worse off than we are now. At least Boris believed — and still believes — in Brexit and is about the only Cabinet voice making an optimistic case for our bright global future once we can break free of the EU yoke.

Frankly, I've never thought Mother Theresa was up to the job. I'm not even sure her heart is in leaving the EU, despite promising that 'Brexit means Brexit'.

She's bungled the negotiations, has been captured by the Civil Service and has allowed herself to be bullied not just by Barnier and his team, but by the Remainiacs in her own party.

Tory Brexiteers aren't 'rebels', as they are frequently described disparagingly. They were on the winning side and speak for 17.4 million people, outside the Westminster bubble, not a handful of hardcore metropolitan malcontents.

May's inherent indecision, which has characterised her career, has enabled the opponents of Brexit to seize the initiative at every turn.

She should never have agreed to give the EU a penny, let alone £39 billion as a basis for negotiation, and she should have simply ignored their cynical posturing over the Irish border. 

Allowing them to raise the spectre of a return to violence was monstrous.

They're doing it again over the Galileo satellite project, saying the UK will be denied vital defence intelligence. 

Two can play at that game. Our response should be to tell the EU that they can forget about any co-operation from GCHQ, Scotland Yard and British security services.

And anyway, our American allies have got a perfectly good satellite system which they are happy to share with us. Have a nice day.

Mrs May hasn't had a bad three months, after her trials and tribulations last year. Is it too much to hope that she might be emboldened to take a tougher line on Brexit, at home and abroad.

She should start immediately by creating 800 new peers. They will only be appointed if they agree to two conditions: 1) Vote through all Brexit legislation. 2) Once that's done, they must vote for the abolition of the House of Lords.

Their reward will be that they can keep the titles, which will help them secure a few directorships and jump the queue at fashionable restaurants. Trust me, there'd be no shortage of applicants.

As I've long maintained, we won't get an acceptable deal from the EU negotiators unless Mrs May is prepared to walk away, Renee. Shamefully, the Government seems ill prepared for No Deal.

Nobody should need reminding that Europe has more to lose than Britain — both economically and militarily. 

Surrendering to every demand from Brussels is not, and should not be, an option. Nor is trying to appease the Remainers in her own party.

Do the Soubrys, Morgans and Grieves really want to risk bringing down their own Government and ushering in the Corbyn terror? May should read them the riot act — not demonise Jacob Rees-Mogg, who is only speaking for the majority of voters.

If the PM has learned one thing this year it is that standing up to bullies pays off. Her popularity and reputation rocketed at home and abroad when she faced down Putin over the Salisbury poisoning.

If Mother Theresa can find the courage to stand up to Russia, then isn't it time, after two years of vacillation and capitulation, that she summoned up the backbone to face down the EU?

 

[BUT WILL SHE?]

*

 


READ  MORE: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5769361/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-Brexit-taking-longer-defeating-Hitler-Nazi-Germany.html#ixzz5GW1KGJ2C
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on FAcebook

 

H.F.1555

*  *  *

 

[MRS MAY-PLEASE! TAKE NOTICE!]

 

*

AUSTRIA TO SHUT

Seven mosques

and throw out

60 preachers.

 [The moderate Imams in England have been urging the government of the day for many years to do just this, but political correctness, and of course the value of their votes which are in many millions, have prevented this from happening.  The result is that many moderate Muslims have decided to go with the majority who have no intention of integrating and only await the day they achieve THEIR ISLAMIC STATE in ENGLAND and by inaction Mrs May and others in the past will have assisted them to achieve

 THEIR LIFE LONG AMBITION.]

 

Austria to close 7 mosques, expel imams in crackdown | Daily Mail ...Mail Foreign Service.

Austria-close-7-mosques-expel-imams-crackdown.html

2 days ago ... BERLIN (AP) - Austria's government said Friday that it is closing seven mosques
and plans to expel imams in a crackdown on "political Islam" ...

 

Austria to close 7 mosques, expel imams in crackdown

 

BERLIN (AP) - Austria's government said Friday that it is closing seven mosques and plans to expel imams in a crackdown on "political Islam" and foreign financing of religious groups.

Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said the government is shutting a hardline Turkish nationalist mosque in Vienna and dissolving a group called the Arab Religious Community that runs six mosques.

The actions by the government are based on a 2015 law that, among other things, prevents religious communities from getting funding from abroad. Interior Minister Herbert Kickl said the residence permits of around 40 imams employed by ATIB, a group that oversees Turkish mosques in Austria, are being reviewed because of concerns about such financing.

 

Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz speaks during a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Wednesday, June 6, 2018. (AP Photo/Geert Vanden Wijngaert)

Kickl said that, in two cases, permits have already been revoked. Five more imams were denied first-time permits.

The conservative Kurz became chancellor in December in a coalition with the anti-migration Freedom Party.

In campaigning for last year's election, both coalition parties called for tougher immigration controls, quick deportations of asylum-seekers whose requests are denied and a crackdown on radical Islam. The government recently announced plans to ban girls in elementary schools and kindergartens from wearing headscarves, adding to existing restrictions on veils.

"Parallel societies, political Islam and tendencies toward radicalization have no place in our country," Kurz told reporters in Vienna. He added that the government's powers to intervene "were not sufficiently used" in the past.

Friday's measures are "a first significant and necessary step in the right direction," said Vice Chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache, the Freedom Party's leader. "If these measures aren't enough, we will if necessary evaluate the legal situation here or there."

Austria's move angered the government in Turkey, where President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's spokesman said the decision "is a reflection of the Islamophobic, racist and discriminatory wave in this country."

"It is an attempt to target Muslim communities for the sake of scoring cheap political points," spokesman Ibrahim Kalin wrote on Twitter. He added that "the Austrian government's ideologically charged practices are in violation of universal legal principles, social integration policies, minority rights and the ethics of co-existence."

 

*  *  *  *

Searches related to WHY SHARIA COURTS MUST BE BANNED TO FURTHER FULL INTEGRATION OF 3MILLION MUSLIMS IN ENGLAND WITH THEIR BIRTHRATE ADVANTAGE OF 4-1

mayor of leeds uk

who is the mayor of oldham england

mayor of sheffield uk

who is the mayor of blackburn england

mayor of rockdale uk

mayor of birmingham england

mayor of luton uk

mayor of rochdale uk

 H. F .1156/1

IMMIGRATION FILE

IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS

[ Saudi-Arabia has considerable capital invested in England and uses its financial power to encourage the  the growth of followers of the Muslim faith which is estimated to be almost 4million-but who knows when  thousands of visitors don't even have their passports checked?

We would wish to see a much more robust  attitude by the Government which has been called for by moderate Muslim clerics for many years and we endorse the actions of the Austrian opposition parties to be implemented

HERE!

"In campaigning for last year's election, both coalition parties called for tougher immigration controls, quick deportations of asylum-seekers whose requests are denied and a crackdown on radical Islam. The government recently announced plans to ban girls in elementary schools and kindergartens from wearing headscarves, adding to existing restrictions on veils.

"Parallel societies, political Islam and tendencies toward radicalization have no place in our country," Kurz told reporters in Vienna. He added that the government's powers to intervene "were not sufficiently used" in the past."

The problem we have in England is that there is no political party in Westminster that protects the

'SACRED AND UNIQUE INHERITANCE OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE'

*

The Claims of Nationality

" any group which feels itself a nation wants the fullest freedom to use its own language-the language that comes natural to it and embodies an important part of its cultural tradition. It wants this language to be employed in official, as well as in private affairs. It wants laws to be written and interpreted in this language; it wants this language to be spoken in its courts, police stations, and administrative offices. It wants the teaching of this language to be basic in schools, and the teaching of other subjects to be carried on in this language. It wants newspapers to be published, books to be written, dramas to be performed in this language. In other words, it wants its traditional tongue to be mistakably the language of its country. "

Beyond this  I argued," nationalists want their schools and universities to be places where  the young are taught to understand and to value the national history and tradition, and to master the national values and ideas of living....They want these arts in which there is a tradition of national excellence to be especially cultivated... and they claim the right to follow the traditional religion of their nation." I went on to point out that this religious claim often gives rise to difficulties, because it may not be simply a claim for freedom of worship [as in the UK], but also a claim to the exclusive practice and teaching of the national religion, and some religions [ ISLAM] are basically intolerant. This claim to exclusiveness-I contended to be inconsistent with the rights of the individual and group self-expression which all democracies ought to safeguard and  to encourage. Nevertheless, it may be necessary to compromise.

"When the great majority of a nation belong to a particular Church, it may be necessary to allow that Church some part in the public ceremonials of the people... but it would be wrong to allow any CHURCH to insist on membership as a qualification for office, or for any right of citizenship, and it would be wholly indefensible to endow any such Church with any exclusive control over education, or with coercive power at all over persons who do not voluntarily accept its discipline,"...

see Europe, Russia and the future, by G. D. H. Cole, Chapter 12....

The Intelligent Mans Guide to the Post -War World.

1947

London

VICTOR GOLLANCZ LTD

*  *  *

[IT MUST BE REMEMBERED THAT WORLD HISTORY HAS SHOWN HOW SETTLED PEOPLES IN THEIR LAND HAVE  OVER TIME SEEN THEIR LAND TAKEN BY THOSE OF ANOTHER RACE AND FAITH .

ON SEPTEMBER 13,2007

'THE DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES'WAS ADOPTED BY THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY.

-Articles 8 (1)-ARTICLE 9-ARTICLE 26 (1)

Politicians of all parties at Westminster need to ensure that future generations in our island home will have no reason to fear such a DANGER from WITHIN]

COMPROMISE

'Compromise is but the sacrifice of one right or good in the hope of retaining another,-too often ending in the loss of both,'

Tryon Edwards'

From the beginning of our history the country has been afflicted  with compromise.  It is by compromise that human rights  have been abandoned. I insist that this shall cease. The country needs repose after  its trials; it deserves repose. And repose can only be found in everlasting principles.- Charles Sumner (1811-74) American statesman.

Principles

Principle is a passion for truth and right.

Hazlitt

AND WHAT BREXIT MUST SHOW IS BOTH!

17.4 voters wanted their country's freedom of action back in their hands which had been by deceit and fraud taken from them by a Conservative Government in 1972-Not partially - but ALL

THAT IS THE TRUTH AND RIGHT OF THE MATTER!

*

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1567

*  *  *

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 JUNE 4,2018

*

BREXIT

 NEEDS COURAGE

NOT

FRIGHTENED RABBITS.

ANOTHER day, another absurdly apocalyptic Brexit forecast from Whitehall. This time it's a nightmarish fantasy of what could happen if we leave the EU without a customs deal.

 Critical shortages of fuel, medicines and food, the collapse of port authorities at Dover and the military being drafted in to distribute supplies to hungry multitudes. All that's missing is a plague of frogs.

The Brexit department, which. commissioned the study, said the idea that such a scenario could happen was

'COMPLETELY FALSE'

Former minister Iain Duncan Smith dismissed the civil servants who drew it up as

'Frightened rabbits'.

But in the absence of an aggressive counter message from

 DOWNING STREET

this kind of tendentious rubbish is being seized on by

REMAINERS

as proof that leaving the EU will be a disaster.

So shouldn't Theresa May be out preaching the virtues of regaining control and becoming

AN

INDEPENDENT TRADING NATION

ONCE MORE?

[The World our Oyster as

WHAT FREDERICK FORSYTH STATED:

ONCE WE ARE FREE OF THE EU THE WORLD IS OUR OYSTER]

This is a hugely important month for

BREXIT

The EU Withdrawal Bill returns to the Commons after the Lords sent it back with no fewer than

15 amendments-all designed to

STALL--DILUTE- or REVERSE the REFERENDUM RESULT.

THEY MUST BE DEFEATED.

The unelected upper House is stuffed with cronies and part hacks. The idea that it could overturn the wishes of 17.4million voters is an affront  to

DEMOCRACY.

Even Remainer Lord Lloyd-Webber says his fellow peers are profoundly wrong to defy the

WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

BUT unless Mrs May seizes back the initiative, they may yet succeed in wrecking the Bill. She needs to channel the same strength and resolve she showed in facing down Russia after the Salisbury poison attack and

GO ON THE OFFENSIVE.

She must set out her detained blueprint for our post-Brexit future and start preparing seriously for the prospect of a

NO DEAL.

Chief Brussels negotiator Michael Barnier says Britain is living in a 'fantasy world' to believe we can have frictionless trade without being in the

CUSTOM UNION.

He also insists the whole of the EU is united behind him.

This is not only an insult, but also a gross perversion of the TRUTH.

From Italy to Slovenia, Greece to Hungary, Eurosceptic parties are

ON THE MARCH.

Many have sympathy with Britain's position and it may not be long before we are joined in the

EXIT QUEUE.

Mr Barnier is in a far weaker position than he pretends. Mrs May should

[after two years of dilatory stalemate]

should

GET TOUGH AND CALL HIS BLUFF.

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CHANGE OF FORM-CAPS-ARE OURS!]

JUNE 4, 2018

 

H.F.1565

*  *  *

AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF

THE BEAST!

IN

BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS

GIVEN AWAY BY THE

TRAITOROUS

 EDWARD HEATH

 TO BE RETURNED IN

MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

*

ENGLAND'S

GREAT ESCAPE

 FROM

HITLER'S  FOURTH REICH

See also: eutruth.org.uk-Why we are leaving!-if you need a reminder?

*

IN MARCH 2018 WE HEAR THAT   ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IS GOING TO SELL OUT OUR FISHING RIGHTS AND  ISLAND FISHING FIELDS.

 THERE MUST BE NO SURRENDER OF ENGLISH

AND OTHER  ISLAND NATIONS SOVEREIGNTY OF THEIR HISTORIC WATERS.

This has been brought about because as we  suspected  to expect a

 REMAIN Prime Minister and her fellow closet traitors

 to put her country FIRST! and give the PEOPLE their

 BREXIT which means BREXIT

now looks like an impossible dream.

ENGLAND IS NOT ENGLAND WITHOUT FULL CONTROL OF HER HISTORIC WATERS.

BETRAYAL!

Now foreign firms to keep fishing in UK waters after

BREXIT

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

In 1962,

Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality  HITLER'S plan for Europe under GERMAN Control.

 


    Winston Churchill, Myth and Reality: What He Actually Did and Said - Google Books Result
     

    Britain's attitude, Churchill explained, resembles that which we adopt about the
    European Army. We help, we dedicate, we play a part, but we are not merged
    with and do not forfeit our
    insular or commonwealth character. Our first object is
    the unity and consolidation of the British Commonwealth. Our second, “the
    fraternal ...

SCOTLAND AND WALES HAVE THEIR PARLIAMENT

 - HOW LONG MUST

 ENGLAND

WAIT FOR HER'S?

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH.

*

THE TRAITOROUS PEERS

ARE THE

'USEFULL IDIOTS'

OF THE

 HITLERITE EUROPEAN UNION

*

We're sure that Mrs May is aware of the biblical psalm

'Righteousness exalteth a nation' [14:34]

17.4 million people voted in June 2016 to regain their once FREE -INDEPENDENT NATION STATE and since that time many others are joining the BREXIT BANNER by the DAY.

 

'LET RIGHT BE DONE!'

*

On the facts before us as to the closet EU retainers advising the PM at the highest level in Government it can only be construed as an example  of duplicity - hardly likely to give confidence to Brexit voters at this time?

We can see little difference between the actions of  the arch traitor Edward Heath  with his top civil servants in the 1970's and the actions of Theresa May  with hers in 2018. WE ask where is the English attribute of 'Fair- play' in this matter?

Brexiteers,for sure, dont want any 'dreamed up

'CRETINOUS'

plan from Europhiles.

*

'Nothing is ever settled until it is settled right'.

Rudyard Kipling.

*

WE NOW MUST DEPEND ON THE

 BREXIT FOUR-

FOX-DAVIS-JOHNSON-GOVE

'Statesman, yet friend to truth! of soul sincere / in action faithful, and in honour clear,/ Who broke no promise, served no private end,/ Who gained no title, and lost no friend. '[Ib.V.67] - Pope

MRS MAY HAS GONE WELL ASTRAY BECAUSE THE EU CUSTOM UNION IS STILL IN PLAY AND THAT TELLS US THAT MRS MAY WAS NOT AN IDEAL POLITICIAN

TO SEE

ENGLAND AND FREEDOM - AGAIN HERE TO STAY.

*

MAY 2,2018

 

*  *  *

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 JUNE 4,2018

*

BREXIT

 NEEDS COURAGE

NOT

FRIGHTENED RABBITS.

ANOTHER day, another absurdly apocalyptic Brexit forecast from Whitehall. This time it's a nightmarish fantasy of what could happen if we leave the EU without a customs deal.

 Critical shortages of fuel, medicines and food, the collapse of port authorities at Dover and the military being drafted in to distribute supplies to hungry multitudes. All that's missing is a plague of frogs.

The Brexit department, which. commissioned the study, said the idea that such a scenario could happen was

'COMPLETELY FALSE'

Former minister Iain Duncan Smith dismissed the civil servants who drew it up as

'Frightened rabbits'.

But in the absence of an aggressive counter message from

 DOWNING STREET

this kind of tendentious rubbish is being seized on by

REMAINERS

as proof that leaving the EU will be a disaster.

So shouldn't Theresa May be out preaching the virtues of regaining control and becoming

AN

INDEPENDENT TRADING NATION

ONCE MORE?

[The World our Oyster as

WHAT FREDERICK FORSYTH STATED:

ONCE WE ARE FREE OF THE EU THE WORLD IS OUR OYSTER]

This is a hugely important month for

BREXIT

TheEU Withdrawal Bill returns to the Commons after the Lords sent it back with no fewer than

15 amendments-all designed to

STALL--DILUTE- or REVERSE the REFERENDUM RESULT.

THEY MUST BE DEFEATED.

The unelected upper House is stuffed with cronies and part hacks. The idea that it could overturn the wishes of 17.4million voters is an affront  to

DEMOCRACY.

Even Remainer Lord Lloyd-Webber says his fellow peers are profoundly wrong to defy the

WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

BUT unless Mrs May seizes back the initiative, they may yet succeed in wrecking the Bill. She needs to channel the same strength and resolve she showed in facing down Russia after the Salisbury poison attack and

GO ON THE OFFENSIVE.

She must set out her detained blueprint for our post-Brexit future and start preparing seriously for the prospect of a

NO DEAL.

Chief Brussels negotiator Michael Barnier says Britain is living in a 'fantasy world' to believe we can have frictionless trade without being in the

CUSTOM UNION.

He also insists the whole of the EU is united behind him.

This is not only an insult, but also a gross perversion of the TRUTH.

From Italy to Slovenia, Greece to Hungary, Eurosceptic parties are

ON THE MARCH.

Many have sympathy with Britain's position and it may not be long before we are joined in the

EXIT QUEUE.

Mr Barnier is in a far weaker position than he pretends. Mrs May should

[after two years of dilatory stalemate]

should

GET TOUGH AND CALL HIS BLUFF.

*

 

JUNE 4, 2018

 

H.F.1565

*  *  *

LITTLEJOHN

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Leaving the European Union is taking longer than it did to defeat Hitler and his Nazi Germany

732

View
comments

What right does Soros have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy?

Two years down the drain. Two years of vacillation, obfuscation, cowardice, sabotage and outright betrayal. And that's just from our own Government.

 

On June 23, 2016, in a referendum, 17.4 million people voted to leave the European Union.

No ifs, no buts.

The question on the ballot paper was unambiguous, the so-called catastrophic consequences spelled out in plain English in a brochure distributed to every single home in the country by a Government which was desperate to Remain.

Campaigning was exhaustive, lasting six whole months. We knew exactly what voting Leave would mean. 

 

No single market, no customs union,

 no more submitting to the jurisdiction of European courts. 

Recent developments could mean leaving the European Union will take longer than it did to defeat Hitler and Nazi Germany, writes Richard Littlejohn

We would be retaking control of our borders, our laws, our traditional territorial waters and our national destiny.

Project Fear did its worst and failed. More people voted Leave than have ever voted for anything in our history. By now, we should be as good as gone, with only a few minor details to be ironed out.

Yet two years on, just as I feared, we're no nearer the exit. Every day seems to bring yet another blatant attempt to derail the process, to keep us subjugated in perpetuity as prisoners of a sclerotic, anti-democratic European superstate.

The latest comes from a group bankrolled by the billionaire hedge funder George Soros, a Hungarian-born American who made his fortune betting against the pound on Black Wednesday in 1992.

Having earned the nickname of the Man Who Broke The Bank Of England, he is now determined to become The Man Who Broke The Will Of The British People.

What right does Soros have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy?

Yet the same people here who are squealing about Russia meddling in the U.S. election (because that delivered the 'wrong' result, too) are cheering him on.

This self-appointed fifth column will stop at nothing to overturn the referendum result. The stitch-up started the moment the result was announced.

We've had endless legal challenges, and the disgraceful attempts by the unelected, self-serving Lords to stop Brexit.

Project Fear — far from admitting it lost fair and square, packing up its tent and going home —has been ramping up the volume, aided and abetted by the BBC, the Financial Times and the political establishment.

The head of Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, John Thompson, joined in this week, warning that technology designed to keep trade flowing seamlessly after Brexit would cost businesses £20 billion and take at least three years to introduce after the proposed 'transition' period is due to end.

 

What right does [George] Soros (pictured) have to interfere in the internal affairs of a foreign country, especially one which voted conclusively to regain its full sovereignty from a remote pan-European technocracy? Asks Richard Littlejohn

Such a delay would keep us in the customs union until December 2023. That's seven years after we voted Leave — longer than it took us to defeat Nazi Germany.

Thompson obviously hadn't read Robert Hardman's brilliant dispatch in last Saturday's Mail from the port of Felixstowe, where a comparable system works without a hitch and could easily be applied elsewhere, including the Irish border.

The governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, a siren voice of Project Fear, waded back in by claiming every British family would be 'up to potentially' £900 a year worse off after Brexit.

What does 'up to potentially' actually mean? I'll tell you — he made it up. It's a guess, pure and simple. This figure is about as accurate as all the other scaremongering forecasts the Bank put out during the referendum.

Carney, a Canadian, is one of the worst of the Remoaner stooges. He's supposed to be independent, but owes his job to the political establishment. 

He maintains Brexit will be a retrograde step, an economic disaster, but at the same time is said to harbour ambitions of becoming the next Prime Minister of proudly independent Canada.

So let him explain something. This time last year, I was sitting in a waterfront seafood restaurant on the Detroit River, looking across at Windsor, Ontario.

The distance from the U.S. to Canada at this point is about the width of the Thames at Dartford. 

The governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, a siren voice of Project Fear, waded back in by claiming every British family would be 'up to potentially' £900 a year worse off after Brexit

Every day thousands of trucks trundle across the border in either direction, carrying imports and exports of everything from car components to Canadian bacon.

If Carney does stand as PM, will he tell his fellow countrymen that all this trade will have to stop unless they agree to be ruled by America, have their laws decided in Washington and surrender the right to decide who lives in their country? Of course not.

So why should the prosperity of Britain, the world's fifth biggest economy, be determined by whether or not we belong to the EU and take orders from Brussels? 

Look, we expect Remoaners to insult our intelligence, tell us we were too stupid to know what we were voting for, and fight to the last ditch to stop us leaving.

We just have to live with it, although I can do without the constant bombardment of anti-Brexit lies and intimidation masquerading as 'news' which seems to dominate every TV and radio bulletin.

Labour is a lost cause, too. Despite promising in its last manifesto to respect the Brexit vote, Labour is now only interested in bringing down the Government — even if that means betraying the millions of traditional Labour supporters who voted Leave.

My biggest worry all along has been the Tory Government itself, even before Theresa May sacrificed her majority in that vainglorious General Election last year.

Regular readers will know I'm no fan of Mother Theresa. I thought Boris deserved the job when Call Me Dave committed hara-kiri. 

He was the figurehead for the Leave campaign and the spoils should have gone to the victor.

Theresa May's (pictured) inherent indecision, which has characterised her career, has enabled the opponents of Brexit to seize the initiative at every turn

If he'd screwed up, we'd be no worse off than we are now. At least Boris believed — and still believes — in Brexit and is about the only Cabinet voice making an optimistic case for our bright global future once we can break free of the EU yoke.

Frankly, I've never thought Mother Theresa was up to the job. I'm not even sure her heart is in leaving the EU, despite promising that 'Brexit means Brexit'.

She's bungled the negotiations, has been captured by the Civil Service and has allowed herself to be bullied not just by Barnier and his team, but by the Remainiacs in her own party.

Tory Brexiteers aren't 'rebels', as they are frequently described disparagingly. They were on the winning side and speak for 17.4 million people, outside the Westminster bubble, not a handful of hardcore metropolitan malcontents.

May's inherent indecision, which has characterised her career, has enabled the opponents of Brexit to seize the initiative at every turn.

She should never have agreed to give the EU a penny, let alone £39 billion as a basis for negotiation, and she should have simply ignored their cynical posturing over the Irish border. 

Allowing them to raise the spectre of a return to violence was monstrous.

They're doing it again over the Galileo satellite project, saying the UK will be denied vital defence intelligence. 

Two can play at that game. Our response should be to tell the EU that they can forget about any co-operation from GCHQ, Scotland Yard and British security services.

And anyway, our American allies have got a perfectly good satellite system which they are happy to share with us. Have a nice day.

Mrs May hasn't had a bad three months, after her trials and tribulations last year. Is it too much to hope that she might be emboldened to take a tougher line on Brexit, at home and abroad.

She should start immediately by creating 800 new peers. They will only be appointed if they agree to two conditions: 1) Vote through all Brexit legislation. 2) Once that's done, they must vote for the abolition of the House of Lords.

Their reward will be that they can keep the titles, which will help them secure a few directorships and jump the queue at fashionable restaurants. Trust me, there'd be no shortage of applicants.

As I've long maintained, we won't get an acceptable deal from the EU negotiators unless Mrs May is prepared to walk away, Renee. Shamefully, the Government seems ill prepared for No Deal.

Nobody should need reminding that Europe has more to lose than Britain — both economically and militarily. 

Surrendering to every demand from Brussels is not, and should not be, an option. Nor is trying to appease the Remainers in her own party.

Do the Soubrys, Morgans and Grieves really want to risk bringing down their own Government and ushering in the Corbyn terror? May should read them the riot act — not demonise Jacob Rees-Mogg, who is only speaking for the majority of voters.

If the PM has learned one thing this year it is that standing up to bullies pays off. Her popularity and reputation rocketed at home and abroad when she faced down Putin over the Salisbury poisoning.

If Mother Theresa can find the courage to stand up to Russia, then isn't it time, after two years of vacillation and capitulation, that she summoned up the backbone to face down the EU?

 

[BUT WILL SHE?]

*

 


READ  MORE: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5769361/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-Brexit-taking-longer-defeating-Hitler-Nazi-Germany.html#ixzz5GW1KGJ2C
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on FAcebook

 

H.F.1555

*  *  *

[A REMINDER FROM 2010 TO THOSE REMAINERS WHO PUT PERSONAL CONSIDERATIONS BEFORE THAT OF LOYALTY TO CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY]

*

 

WHAT FREDERICK FORSYTH STATED:

 

ONCE WE ARE FREE OF THE EU THE WORLD IS OUR OYSTER

 

 

It HAD to come sooner or later and now it has happened. A major national newspaper, the Daily Express, has called for Britain to end its full membership of the European Union.

  Let us get two points clear.

 

1.   this does not mean severing our 1,000-year trading relationship with that continent.   trade is what we live by, always have.  Trade is what we were told 38 years ago was what would be freed and enhanced by joining the [EEC] European Economic Area.    Trade without tariffs, duties, taxes, protectionism and bureaucracy.

 

And we said YES.

 

We were lied to. 

HEATH

 lied to us.  They still do.  The EU of today and tomorrow

 

is not about trade

 

It is about the end of a nation state, replaced by a vast central governed empire.

For years this has been denied

 

Now it is very clearly out in the open.  But the huge majority of our people are deeply wedded to Old Blighty and refuse to abolish her by tricks and threat to become a devolved regional territory.

 

2.  Inside the European Economic Area like mega-rich Norway, we could trade and trade again with the EU and keep

our country, our laws, our justice system and our sovereignty.

 

And there are vast opportunities out there if only we had the nerve to face outwards not inwards.  Fifty-two nations of the Commonwealth want to increase trade, so does the Anglo-sphere: Ireland, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.  New giants are emerging: Brazil, India, China that make the EU look pathetic.

 

We must turn back to the open oceans whence our properity came. 

That world is growing, the Brussels world is shrinking slowly dying

 

But the [intended] EEA would suit us fine.

 

David Cameron complains about us "banging on about Europe"

You're wrong David.

 

We're banging on about Britain.

So should you.

 

Too many millions of us are sick and tired of endless capitulation.  We do not feel we are a free people any more

 

So listen to us. We want to be free of the thralldom of Brussels.

 

-DAILY EXPRESS-NOV26-2010

 

 

[Since the 'This England ' PETITION of 900,000 signatues increased to a million, to the Queen in 2004 by those indomitable PATRIOTS:   RON and NIGEL MCWHIRTER and JOHN GOURIET who died at their posts fighting to the end for OUR FREEDOM-OUR CONSTITUTION -OUR COUNTRY. We were priviledged to be in their company at the rear of Buckingham Palace when the PETITION was delivered.]

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

NOVEMBER 26,2010

 H.F.1438/1

*  *  *

THERESA MAY'S SURRENDER

 TO

HITLER'S LAIR

IN

SEPTEMBER 2017

 IS REMINISCENT

OF

PRIME MINISTER NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN'S

LACK OF GRIT

IN

1938

WHICH LED TO WORLD WAR TWO IN SEPTEMBER 1939

AS THEN WE HAVE THE PHONEY WAR AND THE

BATTLE FOR BRITAIN.

What would those who died protecting our skies in 1940 think of the GREAT BETRAYAL by fellow citizens to their FOE of TWO WORLD WARS-

GERMANY

IN 2017 WE haven't  even had our Dunkirk as we haven't in reality even crossed the Channel to claim our FREEDOM after 15 months since a majority voted for the return of THEIR COUNTRY LAW-CUSTOM- given away by TRAITORS in 1972.

 

BEING IN THE UNDERBELLY OF EUROPE WON'T HELP ONE IOTA!-GERMANY IS ADJUDICATOR!

WE HAVE STALEMATE!

THE ANSWER IS TO BOYCOTT GOODS FROM FRANCE AND GERMANY WHO ARE THE DRIVER AND FIREMAN OF THE EU EXPRESS.

WE BUY MORE FROM EUROPE THAN THEY BUY FROM US!

BUSINESSES IN THE MAIN  SUPPORT THE EU

WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A WAR OF SORTS!

REMEMBER!

WE ARE NOT DEALING WITH A DEMOCRATIC BODY BUT WITH THE HITLERITE -AUTOCRATIC EU

*

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

***

TREASON

 

comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length. We mentioned at the time that  a distance between them would have given more confidence that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

 

APRIL 9,2018

 

H.F.1525/1

In November 2005 we put the following bulletin

Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

 

 on our EDP WEBSITE

SEPTEMBER 2017

H.F1321 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLAN FOR EUROPE

*  *  *

 

[AT LONG  LONG LAST!

-A WORLD OF CHANGE !

 FOR THE BETTERMENT OF HUMANITY.]

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

New financial crisis likely as Western civil war intensifies in Washington D.C., Europe, Brazil and elsewhere

T

The undeclared civil war inside the ranks of the Western elite is continuing to rage, with both sides carrying out major offensives.  Ultimately, this battle is between the old aristocratic bloodlines, strongest in Europe, and the anti-bloodline Gnostic Illuminati, now prevalent inside the U.S.

The biggest battleground continues to be Washington, D.C., where the old establishment is fighting for its life and losing against the military-backed regime of President Donald Trump.

However, the situation in Europe is also heating up intensely as the Russia/China Eurasian alliance moves to consolidate control there in alliance with some old-bloodline factions, according to White Dragon Society sources in Europe.  Germany and Turkey, reviving a World War I alliance, are leading the anti-U.S. moves there.  Also, Italy’s new government has declared open warfare against the Khazarian mafia cabal in a move that will bring new turmoil to the eurozone.

We will start with a look at the situation inside the U.S.  Here, the U.S. military is supporting President Donald Trump in some ways, while fighting against him in others.  This ambiguous stance can be seen in the form of a continuing major offensive against pedophiles and other corrupt elements in the old establishment.

A Pentagon source summed up the situation as follows:  “After 8 months of defiance, liberals are reeling from their defeat in the culture war as the NFL was forced to ban kneeling when the national anthem is sung, and nearly 8 months after a New York Times exposé, Manhattan prosecutors were forced to arrest Harvey Weinstein.”

Furthermore, the impending retirement of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy is expected to give the Trump regime control over the Supreme Court, the sources say.  This will make it possible to carry out the long-awaited mass arrests without interference from cabal agents in the justice system, the sources note.  It will also make a big difference in the culture wars, as a pushback to family values and away from promoting non-reproductive sex intensifies with Christian support.

As a part of these culture wars, Harvey Weinstein’s criminal trial is putting a lot of pressure on the Hollywood elite.  Pentagon sources are saying that Weinstein “signals with the book he carries about Communist director Elia Kazan that he will rat on other predators and pedos in Hollywood.”  Kazan’s “testimony as a witness before the House Committee on Un-American Activities in 1952 at the time of the Hollywood blacklist brought him strong negative reactions from many liberal friends and colleagues.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elia_Kazan

Various other rats have been singing like canaries for a while now in a bid to get off the sinking cabal ship.  In particular, we now know that Jeffrey Epstein, who ran a pedophile island used to compromise and blackmail elite politicians, etc., is now an FBI informant who has been squealing to U.S. special prosecutor Robert Mueller.  This is important because Mueller, despite his past tainted by 9/11 etc., is now working for the U.S. military.  Since Trump himself has been a visitor to this pedophile island, the military is getting evidence he was blackmailed into doing Israel’s bidding in places like Syria and Iran, Pentagon sources say.

The pushback against Trump’s Zionist blackmail-induced activity in the Middle East could be seen when “the House on May 23 banned Trump from declaring war on Iran without Congressional approval, and Congress on May 24 killed a measure for the U.S. to recognize Golan as part of Israel,” the sources say.  In other words, Zionist blackmail against Trump is not going to be enough to allow these fanatics the opportunity to start their long-awaited World War III.

Other Pentagon sources, meanwhile, are saying a major victory against the Zionist-controlled banks was achieved last week and that as a result, trillions of dollars fraudulently obtained after the Lehman crisis is now going to be used for a new financial system.  The source says,

“…that a gold-backed U.S. dollar looms on the horizon;  that the U.S. government is going to stop borrowing money from the banks;  that Donald Trump may have succeeded in getting back perhaps…

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.
 

H.F.1563

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 
 
 

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018

 

 
 

 BROUGHT-FORWARD FROM NOVEMBER-2005

Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

 

SO WHY DIDN'T WE?

*

 

A further article from the ONLY sole INDEPENDENT world-wide respected International Currency Review under the heading:

 

*

 

*

CAN BRITAIN WITHHOLD ITS EC CONTRIBUTIONS?

 

PERTINENT LEGAL ADVICE BY LEOLIN PRICE, QUEEN’S COUNSEL

 

The following Legal Opinion was provided by the distinguished veteran constitutional lawyer, Leolin Price QC, in response to a request to consider the following questions:

1. )  Can ministers of the Crown be held culpable for the misuse of UK taxpayers’ money (i.e., of UK Government funds) by the European Commission and/or European Union; and

2. ) Can Britain withhold its contributions to the EC budget on the ground that UK taxpayers’ funds are being misused (embezzled, defrauded, misappropriated, misallocated, misrepresented, etc)? But in reality, these questions are themselves superfluous since, as exposed in this issue [of International Currency Review-Vol 30,4 dated October 10-2005, cstory@worldreports.org

 

  Britain’s EU membership was procured fraudulently, so that under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Britain has every right to leave the EU unilaterally and to cease payment.

 

1.    I preface this Opinion by acknowledging that I am not aware of any precedent for the sort of proceedings in court against Ministers of the Crown, whether civil or criminal, which I am asked to consider.

2.                  But there are two relevant principles of English law to be borne firmly in mind: first, that the King (or Queen) can do no wrong [We must make it clear at the outset that this does not include King Tony-whatever he may think]; secondly, that every subject of the Queen is subject to the RULE OF LAW and equal before the law.  There is no special privilege or status for Ministers or other officers of the Crown.

 

They are vulnerable and ought to be answerable in our courts if something which they have done is not properly authorised by law, infringes the rights of individuals and causes damage.

3.There is also learning about when an officer of the Crown can plead, as a defence to a claim by someone who has suffered from some act of that officer, that what was done was an ‘Act of State’.  A British subject cannot sue the Queen (because the ‘Queen can do no wrong’); and if an act, of which a British subject complains of, is in civil law, a tort, the officer cannot assert that the act complained of was an act, which had been authorised by the Crown (in reality the Government).

 

The Act of State is not available to the officer in that situation.  He must, if he can, show that what was done was a lawful exercise of some power lawfully conferred by

Act of Parliament

Or

Otherwise:

 

See, for example, Johnson v Peglar [1921] 2AC 262.

 

4.)             But a somewhat different line of modern authority R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p Smedley [1985] AC657 recognises that a person – in ex p Smedley, a British taxpayer and elector – may have a ‘sufficient interest’ to bring judicial review proceedings against Government authorities and Ministers.

 

·    Can Ministers of the Crown be held culpable for the misuse of taxpayers’ money (i.e. of UK Government funds) by the European union?

5.)             This is the first – and primary – question on which I am asked to advise [Leolin Price, Queen’s Counsel]

6.)             My answer is that our Courts will not recognise that any direct responsibility is imposed by Government or the Chancellor of the Exchequer for the subsequent application, by the Commission of the European Communities Act or the EU, of our taxpayers’ money which is paid over in accordance with the established legal procedures for making our contributions to the European Union.

7.)             But the history and circumstances of fraud, at the centre of the European Union and in ‘Member States’, and the conspicuous failure of the Commission or the European Union to establish any proper (and obviously necessary) accountancy controls over what happens to the money which is provided by ‘Member States’, has produced a situation in which the British elector and taxpayer may reasonably consider that it is a failure of duty for the Government, Chancellor of the Chequer and treasury to go on handing over our money to what he may reasonably consider is an organisation which is incapable of doing and unwilling to do, anything effective about the corrupt and fraudulent diversion of EU funds.  The history of incapacity and unwillingness includes the following:

(1)    The resignation of the whole Commission upon its acknowledgement of collective responsibility for corruption and fraud.

(2)    In spite of that admission of collective responsibility, the continuation in office of all but one of the resigned Commissioners.

(3)    A continuing failure to establish a minimum of accounting controls over the Commission’s expenditure of money at the centre or within ‘Member States’

(4)    Failure by the Commission, in response to acknowledged and massive misuse of EU money, to establish any regime with a minimum of efficiency and designed in accordance with modern accountancy standards to monitor the expenditure of EU money and to minimise its misuse.

(5)    The apparent inability of the Commission to prevent, or reasonably to combat and control, the corrupt and fraudulent misuse of EU money, including contributions from the United Kingdom.

 

8.           Faced with that history, a UK elector and taxpayer could reasonably expect his Government to suspend, wholly or partly, the further contribution of money from the United Kingdom to the European Union in the continuing absence of proper EU accountancy and controls to combat and contain fraud and corruption and other misuse of EU money; and could reasonably expect English Courts to support his claim for such suspension.

9.           In the circumstances, and before the next instalment of the UK contribution to the EU is to be paid, a UK taxpayer could apply for permission to bring judicial review proceedings challenging the making of the payment on the ground that no responsible Minister of Department of OUR Government could regard it as appropriate to pay over money without any reasonable expectation or even hope that the recipient EU institutions have made any reasonable arrangements to avoid its being, with other EU money, misused.  Experience, especially experience since the collective resignation of the Commission [in 1999], indicates that the money so contributed will be at serious risk of not being used for the purposes for which our Treaty obligations and our law require it to be contributed [sic].

10.  Will such judicial review proceed -ings be successful? The practical and realistic answer is that the [English] Courts will be reluctant to permit the review; but there is a presentable argument, and although there is no previous reported case which provides a precise precedent, it represents a logical development of what has been recognised in reported cases; and the continuing scandal about misuse of EU money provides ground for seriously contending that judicial review ought to be, and is, available to stop exposing UK money to the obvious risk of EU failure to avoid misuse.

11.      The withholding of Treaty-required contributions, which are at serious risk of not being properly used for Treaty purposes, is not-or arguably, is not- a breach of Treaty obligations. [Editor; However as is shown in this issue – of International Currency Review Vol 30,4 the treaty obligations themselves are not applicable,

since the

British Accession Treaty, and collective treaties, were signed for corrupt reward by agents of a Foreign Power.]

12.  The argument will be that the Chancellor of the Exchequer, as a Crown servant, is a guardian of taxpayers’ money and it is a breach of the duties involved in that guardianship to pay over money which, in the hands of the recipient Commission and the EU, will be at such serious risk of misuse.  The First defence will be that the payment is required by our Treaty obligations and by Acts of Parliament; but the answer to that is that the Treaty obligations and Parliament provide authority for payment to support Treaty purposes and NOT to expose the money to established and substantial risk of misuse.

13.   An alternative form of proceedings might be criminal proceedings against the Chancellor for misuse of public money under his control.  The argument for this is that the payment is a serious breach of public duty:  it condones and encourages and facilitates the misuse, and the misuse is foreseeable.  Those instructing me may consider it worthwhile attempting such a criminal case; and it may be that the launching of such a criminal case will achieve judicial discussion of the public duty and its breach.  It is, nevertheless, my opinion that such criminal proceedings will not be successful.

14.      , The better choice of proceedings is judicial review.

 

19th October 2004.

Leolin Price CBE QC,

10 Old Square,

Lincoln’s Inn,

London.

  [Font altered-bolding & underling used-comments in brackets]

 

*         *          *

NOV/05

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

 

 

  [BROUGHT FORWARD FROM NOVEMBER 2005.]

 

H.F.1295-FREEDOM IS OUR RIGHT!

NEW  BREXIT MINISTER

BACKS

NO DEAL

[RATHER THAN KOW-TOW

TO

BRUSSELS AND BERLIN]

Brexit minister who backs no deal: Meteoric rise of leading Eurosceptic after she is given junior position in the department after only becoming an MP in 2015

  • Suella Fernandes was promoted to be a new junior minister in Brexit Department
  • The 37-year-old was elected to Parliament in 2015 and said no deal will be 'great'
  • She is now in the Department for Exiting the European Union, led by David Davis

 

 

Suella Fernandes (pictured) said leaving the EU without a deal would be 'great' for the UK

The Brexit Department has been beefed up with the appointment of a leading Eurosceptic who says leaving the EU without a deal would be 'great' for Britain.

Fareham MP Suella Fernandes, a former barrister, is chairman of the influential European Research Group of pro-Brexit backbench Tories.

Her promotion to a junior ministerial post marks a meteoric rise for the 37-year-old, who was elected to Parliament in 2015.

A daughter of immigrants from Kenya and Mauritius, she has previously declared her determination to make Britain a 'fully sovereign trading nation' once again after Brexit.

She grew up in Wembley, North London. Her mother was a nurse who worked in the NHS for 45 years and her father worked for a housing association.

She won a scholarship to an independent school and studied law at Cambridge where she was chairman of the Cambridge University Conservative Association.

Miss Fernandes says that in 15 years, Brexit 'will be seen as the best thing that has happened to our country'.

She added: 'In the event of no deal, that's great as well for us.

'The ideal is a free trade agreement but in the event of that not working, no deal is something we will capitalise on using our strengths and the opportunities that brings.'

In her maiden speech to the House of Commons, Miss Fernandes said it was 'a stroke of luck to be born British, and my indebtedness goes to the heart of why I am a Conservative'.

 

Ms Fernandes has joined the Department for Exiting the European Union, which is led by David Davis (pictured) 

She added: 'Our party rewards endeavour, enables compassion and liberates people from the shackles of the State. Our party says, 'It doesn't matter where you start. You can make your life and that of others better by taking responsibility and through self-empowerment and generosity'.'

The Department for Exiting the European Union – known as DExEU – which is led by David Davis, now has three junior ministers in the Commons – Miss Fernandes, Robin Walker and Steve Baker.

At the end of her reshuffle, Theresa May had carefully preserved the balance within Cabinet of Leavers and Remainers. The new Work and Pensions Secretary, Esther McVey, backed Brexit.

Two pro-Remain MPs, Claire Perry and Caroline Nokes, will also attend Cabinet.

The most eye-catching promotion on Monday was of David Liddington, a former Europe minister and Remainer, who takes Damian Green's Cabinet Office job, but without the First Secretary of State title. He is seen as a like-for-like replacement. However, there was no job for Jacob Rees-Mogg, a prominent Eurosceptic.

[Obviously, his quiet sensible straight forward utterings on Brexit and many other matters are an embarrassment to certain members of the Government.]

Theresa May carefully preserved the balance within Cabinet of Leavers and Remainers.

[The seriousness of obtaining a Brexit dominance in the Cabinet appears to be downplayed in order to appear even-handed, but in reality, this should not be so , as a majority of voters demanded to LEAVE THE EU and a Brexit majority in the Cabinet should reflect their decision.  IN time of war, as in 1939/1940, the Cabinet was of two frames of mind how to pursue the war  and the predominant view was with vigour and tenacity. In that day,-it was first Neville Chamberlain followed in 1940 by a man of action and leadership Winston Churchill.  In our day we have our Neville Chamberlain and we have yet to have our Winston Churchill, but a Jacob Rees-Mog certainly fitts the picture.]

Contrary to one report, there was no evidence of the appointment of a 'minister for no deal'. On Monday it was suggested the reshuffle would involve a Cabinet-level appointment of a 'no deal' minister to deal with preparations for the collapse of talks. As well as attending Cabinet the minister would 'control a significant budget', the Daily Telegraph reported.

In June, Miss Fernandes succeeded Mr Baker as chairman of the ERG, the main Eurosceptic group of Tory MPs. At the time, she said: 'The next two years will be crucial in the transition of the UK into a fully sovereign trading nation. I don't believe in a 'hard' Brexit or a 'soft' Brexit; I am passionate about a pro-business and jobs-led Brexit which will increase our country's prosperity.'

The group has played a key role in organising Eurosceptic MPs to get behind the Government.

  • Jeremy Corbyn has infuriated Remainers in his party by reminding them that Britain voted to quit the single market.

Leading Europhile MP Chuka Umunna walked out of a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party in disgust as the Labour leader unveiled his vision.

Mr Corbyn told pro-EU Labour MPs at the meeting on Monday night that he would not support their bid to keep Britain in the single market because that was not what voters wanted.

It is the latest clash between the hard-Left Labour leadership, which is known to be lukewarm towards the EU, and most of the party's MPs and members who want continued close co-operation.

One MP told Sky News: 'Jeremy said that when people voted to leave the EU, they voted to leave the single market. Single market membership requires us to be members of the EU...'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5252679/Minister-backs-no-deal-Meteoric-rise-Eurosceptic.html#ixzz53saOgMVO
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

JANUARY 10-2018

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1433

 

WHAT WE SAID IN JUNE 2003

 

*

 

DEFENCE OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

 

THEIR FREEDOMS & LIBERTIES

 

OVER THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS AGO, ONE OF OUR GREATEST ENGLISH POETS JOHN MILTON DURING A CIVIL WAR  WROTE IN DEFENCE OF THE LIBERTY OF THE PRINTED WORD. HE ALSO WAS A DEFENDER OF ENGLISH FREEDOM  -AND

 

“ THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH”.

 

UP TO JUNE THE 12TH2003 THE MOST MOMENTOUS DATE IN OUR HISTORY THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY WILL BE ASKED TO DECIDE WHETHER TO THROW AWAY OVER A THOUSAND YEARS OF CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY – THE ENVY OF THE WORLD FOR A FUTURISTIC DREAM WITH POSSIBLY NO CHANCE TO RETRIEVE OUR INHERITANCE WHICH HAS BEEN BOUGHT WITH THE LIVES AND HARDSHIP OF OUR PEOPLES FROM THE BEGINNINGS OF OUR NATION IN THIS LAND.

 

WHATEVER YOU HEAR FROM EACH SIDE OF THIS DEBATE OR TO BE TRUE TO THE MATTER UNDER DISCUSSION THE POSSIBLE” DEATH THROES” OF OUR NATION, WE ASK THE ENGLISH PEOPLE AND OUR FELLOW ISLANDERS TO LOOK WITHIN THEMSELVES TO THEIR FAMILY AND IMAGINE WHAT THEIR ANCESTORS WOULD SAY TO A NATION WHICH DECIDED TO GIVE UP “A JEWEL OF LIBERTY” NOT SEEN SINCE THE DAYS OF ANCIENT GREECE.

 

OUR NEIGHBOURS ACROSS OUR MOAT OF HISTORY ARE NOT OUR ENEMIES BUT THEY HAVE THEIR INHERITANCE WHICH THEY HAVE THEMSELVES EVOLVED AND HAVE TAKEN THE SUBSTANCE BUT NOT THE SPIRIT OF OUR CONSTITUTION WHICH CAN ONLY BE OBTAINED BY THE EFFORTS OF THE ORIGINAL PARTICIPANTS OF OVER ONE THOUSAND YEARS OF HISTORY.

 

WITH THE WORDS OF OUR GREAT DEFENDER OF ENGLISH LIBERTY

 “GIVE ME THE LIBERTY TO KNOW, TO UTTER, AND TO ARGUE FREELY ACCORDING TO CONSCIENCE, ABOVE ALL LIBERTIES”.

 

 

JUNE, 2003

 

ENGLISH FREEDOM-WHY IT IS YOURS?

[ Above Bulletin No 4-link and colour added February 2016]

SAY 'NO' TO THE EU
 

FREEDOM TO RULE OURSELVES

 

 

The FREEDOM we enjoy today has been achieved by the doggedness of our ancestors and it is an INHERITANCE which has been passed on from generation after generation - it has been fought for since the beginnings of our PEOPLE.

This country abolished the trade of SLAVERY in the early nineteenth century and the traders were compensated. There was no question of anyone refusing to accept compensation and continue to withhold FREEDOM.

Today, the reverse is about to be considered by our government. They intend to hand over the

 " RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

of the English people

which have developed over the centuries since our beginnings in this land.

We are to be asked by our government if we wish to be SLAVES - because that is what it will mean. Those who decline will be expected to accept their slavery if the majority of their citizens no longer wish to be FREE. How can this be so? when it is established law that:

 "No SLAVE can remain un-free in the 'free-air of ENGLAND".

Should the People by a majority decide to relinquish their past freedom for a future among the European States where people are accustomed to rule by a strict regime by an almost unaccountable centralized system where there is

NO! - Common Law of England;
 

NO!- Magna Carta ; NO! - Habeas Corpus ; NO! - Petition of Right ; NO! - Trial by Jury ; NO! - English sense of Fair-Play

 then they will join twenty-eight STATES of which all but six have had Communist or Fascist governments over the past hundred years or so. Some of these countries owe their very existence to this Freedom loving nation of England.
 

If the unthinkable happened - might these Freedom loving people who have been brought to Slavery decide to take the example of their ancestors of over four hundred years ago and look for a new land where English Freedom still exists and await the day when Freedom returns to their Homeland.

Those who wish to Enslave us we would hope will relinquish their English citizenship and leave the 'Land of the Free' for their compatriots beyond our shores where their desire for SLAVERY will be gladly bestowed.

 

JUNE, 2003

* * *

ADDED JANUARY 8,2016

 

[One of our first Bulletins in 2003 when we embarked on our quest to supply information by way of a bulletin file with foremost information on the

 COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-CORRUPT EUROPEAN UNION

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

 

 

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

 

221

The state of the EU

is, we are constantly being told, far more important

than our

HERITAGE

OUR

HISTORY

or our

INDIVIDUALITY

WHAT THE EU WANTS THE EU MUST GET

regardless of the cost to us as citizens.

THAT IS FASCISM.

 We are repeatedly told that we must

SACRIFICE

our

FREEDOM

and our

INDEPENDENCE

so that the

EU SUPERSTATE

can grow

STRONGER.

That, let me remind you, is exactly what fascism is.

There is no little irony in the fact that anyone who wants

THEIR COUNTRY

 to

LEAVE THE EU

these days

is automatically labelled a

RIGHT WING EXTREMIST

a

FASCIST

and a

RACIST.

The European leaders who [like David Cameron] enthusiastically promote the

INTERESTS of the EU

above

THEIR NATION'S INDIVIDUAL INTERESTS

ARE DYED IN THE WOOL

FASCISTS.

And that the raw truth.It happened slowly and without the polishing of jackboots or the giving of silly salutes

BUT WE ALREADY LIVE IN A FASCIST STATE

It's here. It's happened. And there is something surreal and unpleasently 'emperor's new clothesish'

 about the fact that EU politicians are now screaming at us to warn us that

NATIONALISTS

who want to preserve

TRADITION and FREEDOM

ARE

FASCISTS

*

[ONLY YOUR VOTE

TO

'LEAVE THE EU'

[NOT EUROPE!]

will return to you your over a thousand years

of

FREEDOM and COUNTRY

 

DO IT!]

 

FEBRUARY 14-2016

H.F.VERNON COLMAN/10

 

GO TO OUR BULLETIN FILE FOR OTHER BULLETINS SINCE JUNE 2003

OR OUR MONTHLY BULLETINS WHICH SHOULD INCLUDE A LIST OF OVER THE PAST 24 MONTHS.

 

JUNE-2003 -   FEBRUARY 14-2016

 

 

As UK's budget soars to £14 bn,

 MPs demand...

 

CURB BLOATED

FOREIGN AID

 

 

Britain's foreign aid budget soars to £14billion as ministers face pressure to give more money to schools and the NHS

  • Britain's foreign aid budget soared by £555million to almost £14billion last year
  • Ministers are called to look again at the pledge introduced by David Cameron
  • It was to spend 0.7 per cent of national income on overseas handouts each year

 

e-mail

 

Britain's foreign aid budget soared by £555million to almost £14billion last year – more than doubling over a decade.

The figures released yesterday will intensify calls for ministers to look again at the pledge introduced by David Cameron to spend 0.7 per cent of national income on overseas handouts each year.

Ministers are facing pressure to give more money to vital services at home such as cancer screening, schools and the NHS.

Council tax bills are rising by the biggest amount for 14 years this year, in part because of the social care crisis – and policing resources are under scrutiny after more than 50 murders in London since the start of the year.

 

The figures released yesterday will intensify calls for ministers to look again at the pledge introduced by David Cameron (pictured) to spend 0.7 per cent of national income on overseas handouts each year

 

The Treasury is also under pressure to give more money to defence as the threat from Russia intensifies.

Meanwhile, the Home Office faces a backlash over its decision to hand the contract for post-Brexit blue passports to a foreign firm, to save just £10.4million a year.

Despite this, yesterday’s figures showed a jump of 4.2 per cent in the UK’s overseas aid spending in 2017 – taking the foreign budget to a record £13.9billion.

It means the sum has more than doubled from the £6.4billion spent in 2008 and more than quadrupled from the £3.3billion doled out in 2002. Tory MPs last night called for a rethink and urged Penny Mordaunt, the International Development Secretary, to look again at how Britain’s aid cash is distributed.

Foreign aid is calculated according to gross national income, which hit more than £2trillion last year. The budget increased in spite of a string of controversies and critical reports over how the money is spent.

The Daily Mail last year revealed more than £1billion had been given away in cash over the past five years, including via a £300million scheme in Pakistan that has been dogged by claims of corruption.

In 2016, aid officials cancelled a £5.2million project to fund a talk show for Ethiopia’s Spice Girls after the Mail highlighted the case.

And last year, there was fury when it emerged that international rules meant the UK government could not spend foreign aid on British overseas territories hit by hurricane Irma.

Jacob Rees-Mogg, MP for North East Somerset, said last night: ‘Protecting the overseas aid budget continues to be a costly mistake when there are so many other pressing demands on the budget.’

Britain has met the 0.7 per cent target every year since 2013.

 

 

Many MPs last night called for a rethink and urged Penny Mordaunt, the International Development Secretary, to look again at how Britain’s aid cash is distributed

 

Nigel Evans, a Tory member of the Commons international development committee, said: ‘We shouldn’t spend the money just to get rid of it … that is an obscene and grotesque waste of taxpayers’ money … We should have our own sovereign fund for humanitarian emergencies.’

He called for a review of aid rules, adding that taxpayers ‘wonder why it is that why we’ve got money for foreign aid but no money for essentials at home.’

Although most of the aid budget is used by the Department for International Development, other departments are increasingly having to help to get the money out of the door.

In 2017, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, which tackles climate change and supports research in developing countries, spent £769million in aid – an increase of £73million on 2016.

The Department of Health and Social Care spent £101million in 2017, more than double the £46million it was allocated in the previous year. Officials said the boost mainly went on developing vaccines for diseases with ‘epidemic potential’.

Some £557million went to a cross-government fund to spread peace to war-torn nations. But last week, the Independent Commission for Aid Impact said there was a lack of proper checks on whether the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund had a positive impact. Schemes include support to the army and police in countries notorious for human rights abuses.

Some £54.2million was lavished on India, the world’s fastest growing economy, which boasts more billionaires than the UK and itself hands out millions to needy nations. The data also revealed Britain overshot the 0.7 per cent target by £2.2million in 2016.

Conservative MP Peter Bone said: ‘Much of the money is not spent properly … What I want to see is more of that money spent in our own country … The way to improve the situation in developing countries is to trade with them.’

Fellow Tory Andrew Bridgen said: ‘We measure our success by the amount of money we shovel out the door, not how much good we do with it.’

Figures this year showed Britain is one of only seven countries to meet the target.

A Government spokesman said: ‘Our aid budget only increases when the UK economy grows … we are driving value for money to ensure aid cannot be better spent.

‘2017 was an unprecedented year for catastrophic crises and UK aid saved millions of vulnerable people … creating a safer, healthier and more prosperous world for us all, which is in our national interest.’ 

 

[IT ALL SOUNDS GOOD BUT THE TRUTH IS THERE IS A GREAT DEAL OF WASTED RESOURCES WHICH ARE NEEDED MOST URGENTLY

 

AT HOME .

 

CUTTING THE AID BY HALF WILL SEE THE MONEY WELL SPENT AND LIVES WILL BE IMPROVED AND SAVED AT HOME.]


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5583729/Britains-foreign-aid-budget-soars-14billion.html#ixzz5CBk5vgtC
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

 

 

APRIL 6, 2018

 

H.F.1519

 

News for DAILY MAIL-UK pays worst state pension in the developed world

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension in the developed world with a basic payout of £122.30 a week

  • The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West 
  • Former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get worse 
  • Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found.

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings – and last night former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get even worse.

Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70, while future payments could be cut even further to avoid needing massive hikes in national insurance, Baroness Altmann said.

 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found

The league table revealing Britain's pension shame was compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which analyses the world's industrialised nations. 

Out of all the countries compared, Britain comes bottom – even behind poorer nations such as Chile, Poland and Mexico.

While the UK's state pension is worth just 29 per cent of average earnings, in France the equivalent figure is 74.5 per cent. 

Germany's state pension is worth 50.5 per cent of average earnings, while in the USA it is 49.1 per cent. 

The most generous state pension in the world is in the Netherlands, where the payments are slightly higher than average earnings.

 

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings. File photo

Baroness Altmann warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it. 

She said: 'We are one of the world's leading economies, but our support for the oldest in society is not fit for purpose.

'In April 2016, major reforms to the UK state pension were supposed to have made the system affordable for the future, reducing its generosity. Beyond the 2030s, the new state pension will be lower than the old system for most people and the lowest paid, predominantly women, will lose significantly from the new system.

'Despite this, the Government has been advised that the costs of paying state pensions will soar so much over the next 20 years and beyond that further cuts could be required.'

From later this year the state pension age for women will rise from 63 to match men at 65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.

Baroness Ros Altmann (pictured) warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it

The Government's economic forecasters, the Actuary's Department, believes it will become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the 2060s.

This would mean that anyone aged 30 or below now will not get their state pension until they are 70, while those under 20 will have to wait until they are 71.

Baroness Altmann added: 'The Government actuary believes that just funding the UK's exceptionally low state pension will require reducing payments in future or dramatic tax rises. Policymakers face difficult decisions and are also likely to need to increase the state pension age further.'

The former pensions minister called on the Government to do more to address the crisis, including making private pensions more attractive so that more people are willing to pay a portion of their wages into their own fund.

'To avoid burdening younger generations with significant tax rises, it is vital that more is done to boost private pension saving,' she added. 'Auto-enrolment is a good start, but the pensions industry needs to attract more customers to pay more into their pensions.' 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5379521/Britain-pays-retirees-worst-state-pension.html#ixzz56thYQdgc
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[IT IS IRONIC THAT IT WAS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHICH INTRODUCED THE STATE PENSION  OVER A HUNDRED YEARS AGO BY WINSTON CHURCHILL YET AS SHOWN ABOVE IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY BOTH THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES TO THE PRESENT LEVEL AS THE POOREST PENSIONERS OF THE 24 DEVELOPED NATIONS WITH A PERCENTAGE OF THE AVERAGE WAGE OF 29PER CENT-WHEREAS THE TOP NATION NETHERLANDS PAYS 100.6 %. WITH THE CITY MILE BEING BAILED OUT WITH 45 BILLION OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY.]

-A GREEDY SQUARE MILE AND PARSIMONIOUS STATE PENSION YET OUR OVERSEAS AID IS SQUANDERED AND WASTED WITH THE CHARITIES IN THE MAIN GAUGING THEMSELVES WITH HIGH LIVING-AND NOW WE HEAR EVEN PROSTITUTION IS CONSIDERED A PERK OF THE JOB.  THERE APPEARS NO ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT OF CHARITIES TO ENSURE THAT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE FOR THE TRUE NEEDY NOT FOR FUN AND GAMES AND TERRORISTS OR HIGH LIVING OF THOSE RECEIVING THE TAXPAYERS HARD EARNED REMUNERATION WHILE MANY OF THE CONTRIBUTORS ARE IN GREAT PAIN AND MANY DYING WHICH COULD BE GREATLY REDUCED IF CHARITY BEGAN AT HOME.  TO BOAST OF BEING THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO OVERSEAS AID WHILE A GREAT NUMBER OF OUR CITIZENS PARTICULARLY THE POOR AND A NUMBER OF THE ELDERLY  ARE SUFFERING IN ORDER THAT THE TOP OF THE FOREIGN AID LIST IS MAINTAINED.

HOW IS IT THAT THE OTHER 23 NATIONS CAN PROVIDE A HIGHER STATE PENSION? WHAT IS PREVENTING WESTMINSTER FROM BRINGING OUR STATE PENSION UP TO AT LEAST THE AVERAGE OF THOSE ON THE LIST BELOW WHICH CONTAINS MANY NATIONS WHICH CAN HARDLY BE  CONSIDERED RICH COMPARED TO THE UK. IS IT THAT IN THOSE COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE ARE

 PUT FIRST! - NOT LAST?

THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE FEEDING OFF THE PUBLIC PURSE WITH THEIR OBSCENE RATES OF SALARY AND GOLDEN PENSION-POSSIBLY SO LONG AS THEY ARE COMFORTABLE THEY HAVE NO THOUGHT FOR THOSE WHO PAID FOR THEIR LAVISH LIFESTYLE?

PAYOUT AS PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE WAGE
Netherlands   -  100.6%

Portugal        -   94.9%

Italy             -  93.2%

Austria         -  91.8%

Spain             -  81.8%

Denmark        -  80.2%

France            -  74.5%

Belgium          -  66.1%

Finland         -  65%

Czech Republic-60%

Sweden         -  54.9%

Canada          -  53.4%

OECD average=62.9

 

Germany    -    50.5%

USA            -    49.1%

Norway      -    48.8%

Switzerland    -    44.9%

New Zealand   -  43.2%

Australia     -    42.6%

Ireland        -   42.3%

Chile         -     40.1%

Japan           -  40%

Poland       -      38.6%

Mexico         -     29.6%

UK  -  29%

Source-OECD

 

H.F.1478

*  *  *

[BRITISH PENSIONS THE WORST IN G7

WHY?

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM NOVEMBER 13,2007

AS YOU WILL SEE ABOVE THE SITUATION HAS NOT IMPROVED IN 2018 AS REGARDS AN IMPROVED STATE PENSION-IN FACT IT HAS BECOME MUCH WORSE.  POLITICIANS FEATHER THEIR OWN NESTS WITH THEIR GENEROUS SALARIES-PENSIONS AND PERKS BUT DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO GIVE US PENSIONS TO MATCH THE GERMAN AND FRENCH . WE ARE TOLD WE LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY BUT AS YOU WILL SEE BELOW THAT THEY TREAT THEIR PENSIONERS WITH GROSS CONTEMPT!. WITH A MATTER OF MONTHS UNTIL THE WINTER COLD CLAIMS MORE VICTIMS IT IS ABOUT TIME THERESA MAY DECIDED TO REDUCE THE WASTEFUL FOREIGN AID BUDGET AND GIVE PENSIONERS A LIFE SAVING STATE PENSION.-ADDED MAY 19,2018

 

A HAPPY and PROSPEROUS CHRISTMAS for SOME

 

While millions of our pensioners in poverty are ignored by this GOVERNMENT which pays millions in bonus's for FAILURE and this in one of the richest countries in the world.]

*

The 2.5 million pensioners battling to stay warm

by

Steve Doughty

[Daily Mail - Social Affairs Correspondent-Tuesday, November 13,2007]

A FIFTH OF THE OVER -60's spend their winter living in a single room because they cannot afford to keep their whole house warm, it was revealed yesterday.

The shocking figure means that 2.5 million older people limit their heating costs in this way.

A survey also revealed  that one million have to cut back on food to enable them to pay their

HEATING BILLS.

The study for the charity

HELP THE AGED

highlighted the scale of deprivation among the elderly and the reasons

WHY SO MANY OF THEM DIE OVER THE WINTER.

It says that the complexity of many

STATE BENEFITS

 makes it hard for them to claim the cash, compounding

THEIR POVERTY

Help the Aged said

£4.5 billion

worth of pension credit, housing benefit and council tax benefit

GOES UNCLAIMED

It is also estimated that 25,000 die in winter because of illnesses linked to cold and hypothermia. According to the charity's research. Large numbers of the over 60's resort to wearing gloves, overcoats while indoors to avoid having to pay

HEATING BILLS.

A million go to public libraries, coffee shops or malls just to find somewhere warm and more than a million and a half go to bed in the daytime to find warmth under blankets, it said.

Older people have been the poorest section of society for nearly a

DECADE

[Thanks a lot! -New Labour -

WE DON'T THINK SO]

Single mothers who used to be the poorest group, have shot up the income scale thanks to Labour's tax credits and other benefits.

BUT THE ELDERLY - who are supposed to be  buoyed up by GORDON BROWN'S pension credit system -  OFTEN FAIL TO CLAIM OR ARE MISSED OUT OF THE SYSTEM.

The Daily Mail's

DIGNITY for the ELDERLY

CAMPAIGN

has highlighted the way many are

CHEATED

by the means  when they need a place in a care home and how vital home help that allows them to stay in their own property is being cut back by councils.

[Of course those who have already secured their gold-plated pensions by working for the GOVERNMENT and who have themselves an opportunity of obtaining special bonus's are unforgiving about those unfortunate beings THE ELDERLY who are looked on as an unnecessary expenditure which they could do without whereas any politically correct hair-brained schemes always seem to attract the necessary funds without restriction. We have members of parliament on upwards of  £250,000 with their upper limit always rising but the pensioners who have given good service to their country having at their time of lives to pass the pension credit hurdle which was so designed that any self-respecting

LEGISLATIVE CHAMBER

WOULD HAVE BEEN DONE AWAY WITH ON ITS FAILURE TO DO THE JOB OF REDUCING POVERTY IN THE ELDERLY]

The complexity of making a claim for pension credit and other benefits is often cited as one reason why they are not taken up. Another is that the elderly are reluctant to claim means-tested benefits, seen by many as demeaning handouts.

The charity which conducted its survey with British Gas, called for greater state efforts

TO REACH THOSE WHO NEED HELP.

(11.4 million pensioners in Britain)

'Each year over 25,000 older people lose their lives to a preventable cold-related illness,' said Anne Pearson of

HELP the AGED.

'The GOVERNMENT IS NOT DOING NEARLY ENOUGH TO END FUEL POVERTY.

It has a potential jack-pot of

£4.5 billion

waiting for older people, but it dangles this vital cash behind a complex maze of means-tested benefits and, as a result, money continually

FAILS TO REACH THOSE WHO NEED IT TO SURVIVE.

The survey, taken by ICM among 1,171 over 60's last month, indicated that more than

2.5 million

of the country's 11 million elderly live in one room because of the

COST OF HEATING THEIR HOMES.

Almost as many -2.2 million -turn off their heating entirely at some times because of the cost. Around two million wear out-door clothing indoors.

The charity said benefit advice services were unhelpful, with one in three older people left with no idea how they can claim state aid.

Pension credit tops up the income of a single person to

£119.05 a week

and a couple to

£181 a week

Most pensioners are also entitled to winter fuel payments. Those under 79 get between £100 and £200, depending on their circumstances, while those over 80 or over get up to

£300

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in brackets]

 

 

*

Britons have the worst state pensions in the EU

by

 Sean Poulter

 

[Daily Mail-Consumer Affairs Editor-Tuesday, November 13, 2007]

 

 

 

PENSION MISERS

 

State pension as proportion of average working pay

Greece ---------    95.7%

          Luxembourg  ---------   88.3%                      

         Netherlands ----------    81.9%                    

         Spain     ---------  81.2%          

       Denmark   ------------ 79.8%             

         Italy  ------------    67.9%       

      Sweden  ------------      62.1%           

      EU average ------------ 60%               

         France------------   51.2%       

          Germany -----------  39.9%          

            Estonia -----------   32.9%          

      Ireland ----------      32.5%    

              UK -----------  30.8%

 

MILLIONS of Britons are being condemned to POVERTY in OLD AGE

by the worst state pension in the EU, a study shows.

TO BE CONTINUED

*        *         *

[The early signs are are that the coming months will be decidedly colder so that the conditions outlined above will be much deadlier to the pensioner living alone. There are many organisations who have contact with the elderly who by their observations and action could well reduce those who will die of the cold this

SEASON of CHRISTMAS of GOOD WILL to ALL. 

*

 

[Daily Mail - Social Affairs Correspondent-Tuesday, November 13,2007]

 

H.F.1478/ NOVEMBER-2007


 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

 

The world asks, “Has America gone insane?”

The current leadership of the Anglo-Saxon world is acting in a manner that can only be described as insane, by issuing one obviously false, incendiary claim after another in a vain attempt to start World War 3.  They are doing this because the current leadership is literally fighting to survive as the wheels of justice inevitably grind closer.

This is why recently we have seen that UK Prime Minister Theresa May’s hysterical claims that Russia used poison gas inside the UK are being denied by her own government’s experts.  This is also why U.S. President Donald Trump was either forced by blackmail or fooled like an idiot into falsely accusing the Syrian government yet again of attacking its own civilians with chemical weapons.

In both cases, the accusations ultimately came from the actual perpetrators of the crimes.  In the UK, it was elements of its own intelligence services who manufactured the poison gas incident, CIA and MI5 sources confirm.  Russian UN envoy Vasily Nebenzya called the UK’s behavior a “theater of the absurd.”

In the case of Syria, U.S. and UK agents were caught red-handed with banned chemical weapons in their possession.
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2018/04/08/proof-intel-drop-trump-bolton-behind-syria-chemical-attacks-confirmed/

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, for his part, summed up the of opinions many countries about U.S. foreign policy under the Trump administration by noting it to be “highly controversial,” “lacking clarity,” and being run by people none of whom had more than a year’s experience.
http://tass.com/politics/997996

The general impression is that the Trump administration is going against all major international agreements reached in recent years without actually offering an alternative, multiple sources agreed.

On top of that, Trump U.S. Commerce officials, working against the advice of the Pentagon, have declared a trade war with China that they are mathematically doomed to lose.  China’s government has already promised to “fight to the end at any cost.”

So what is really going on here?  The answer, of course, is that the group of Western leaders who brought us the fake war on terror and the various invasions that followed are terrified of losing power and consequently being charged with multiple war crimes.  This is the real reason why they are acting, collectively, in an irrational and hysterical manner.

The situation in the U.S. remains the most intense, as an undeclared but de facto civil war is raging there.  The war pits the fascist Khazarian mafia faction that staged 9/11, the Iraq War, and Fukushima against patriots who want to restore democracy and the rule of law to the West.

Unlike the open warfare of previous civil wars, this one is being fought over the instruments of mass mind control, including money, propaganda, cyberwarfare, targeted assassinations, and unpublicized battles between special forces.

The ongoing attacks on Facebook, Amazon, Google, Twitter, and Microsoft, even as these Internet giants strive to censor the web, are just one visible aspect of this new type of war.

There is also a space war and esoteric dimension to this that is visible to the surface population in small glimpses, much like people on a boat watching a battle between sea monsters that takes place mostly underwater.

The latest such glimpse was the crashing down to earth of the Chinese space station Tiangong-1.  It was downed by U.S. forces in retaliation for recent crashes of U.S. warships apparently engineered by the Chinese, CIA sources say.  Now three U.S. aircraft carrier groups are headed to the South China Sea to confront a massive Chinese battle group there, the CIA sources say.

In fact, though, the two groups may actually be facing a common enemy, say Pentagon sources.  Most of the action is taking place underwater and in secret, the sources say.

According to the CIA sources, “The real reason for all the sabre-rattling by the Western military powers is that…

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

Cabalists plot anti-Trump counterattack in Tokyo

The Japanese Khazarian mafia slave government, desperate to survive, is plotting the removal of U.S. troops from Japan as well as the end of the regime of U.S. President Donald Trump, according to Japanese right-wing sources close to the emperor.  That is why former U.S. President Barack Obama and former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra were here last week, the sources say.  The Japanese regime is working with the Khazarian mafia slave regimes of Theresa May in the UK, Emmanuel Macron of France, and Angela Merkel of Germany in this effort against the Trump regime, the sources say.  The French branch of the Rothschild family is deeply involved in these moves, CIA sources in Asia confirm.

The Japanese regime has joined these anti-Trump efforts because it has become alarmed by a series of recent public rebukes by the Trump military government.  The biggest is that Japan is being kept totally out of the loop about moves towards peace in the Korean Peninsula.  Japan’s government is also upset that, unlike other U.S. allies, it was not given an exemption to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, the sources say.  That is why the Japanese government is making unprecedented (for a usually servile, boot-licking regime) public rebukes of the U.S. moves.

https://sputniknews.com/asia/201803281062974191-japan-china-north-korea-visit/

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-us-trade/japans-aso-rules-out-bilateral-trade-deal-with-u-s-idUSKBN1H50B7

The Abe government has been actively preparing for war with China using North Korea as a pretext, and was totally surprised by the move towards peace, the sources explain.  While the warmongering Abe regime trembles, U.S., Chinese and Russian Presidents “Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, and Vladimir Putin may win the Nobel Peace Prize for a Korean peace treaty and denuclearization,” Pentagon sources say.

By contrast, members of the Abe regime fear being charged with war crimes over their involvement in the March 11, 2011 tsunami and nuclear terror attack on Japan.  This fear has arisen because of the imminent arrest of satan-worshipping Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, who was one of the chief architects of the Fukushima terror operation, they say.  This attack was orchestrated by the Rothschild family in an aborted attempt to evacuate 40 million Japanese to North Korea, members of the Rothschild family confirm.  The plan was to set up new Rothschild Asian headquarters in North Korea, according to these sources.

Now this is all unraveling, and a peace deal in the Korean Peninsula is likely to lead to all of these murderous plans being made public, say CIA, Pentagon, and Japanese right-wing sources.  That is why there is now great fear and loathing amongst the perpetrators of this mass murder, they say.

A CIA source in Thailand said Thaksin Shinawatra was called to Tokyo because “Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is looking for a place to find refuge.  Dubai is at the top of his list.  Once the Japanese people know what he has done to them, he will have to run in order to avoid being taken out.  His time is almost up.”  The source explained that Shinawatra is exiled in Dubai and thus Abe was hoping his connections with the government there would get him shelter as well.

Also, last week a member of the NSA personally visited this writer to warn him they had intercepted communications showing Japanese Finance Minister Taro Aso is actively trying to have me murdered.  Aso is upset at being exposed as the top Rothschild agent in Japan, the NSA official explained.  Aso is also angry that his regime’s construction of a biological warfare factory disguised as a veterinary school has been exposed by this writer, he said.

The other fatal error made by the Abe regime was to sell substandard steel to the U.S. military in a deliberate act of sabotage, Pentagon sources say.  This is something the Abe government will pay a high price for, the sources promise.

Speaking about steel, a U.S. military intelligence source sent this writer the following information:

“The Chinese are reacting to Pentagon claims of substandard steel with great composure.  Senior Chinese officials point out that this was a known problem in 2015 and wiped out by 2017, the Chinese leadership recognizing that their reputation for quality was a priceless national asset.  Interestingly, in the same conversation it was mentioned that China kept many samples of the waste from 9/11, and tested for…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Medical/pharmaceutical lobby group calls for emergency response to “Age Deficiency Syndrome”

April 1st, 2018, CNN* — The Institute for the Promotion of Cloning (IPC), a medical/pharmaceutical lobbying group, has issued a report calling for an emergency response to a crisis of what it calls “Age Deficiency Syndrome” or ADS.  According to the IPC, there are an estimated 1.9 billion ADS victims worldwide.  The IPC defines ADS victims as anyone who is 5 or more years developmentally or chronologically retarded compared to a 20-year-old adult.

This crisis, according to IPC spokesperson H.V. Nomorkids, has long been hidden with euphemisms like “infancy” or “childhood.”  In fact, he says, “An extreme ADS sufferer can be 18 years developmentally and mentally retarded compared to a 20-year-old, and yet this extreme suffering is brushed off by labeling such a victim as a ‘two-year-old,’” he says.

Citing the IPC study, he claims this leads to incredible suffering that has long been ignored and dismissed with misleading labels like “growing pains.”  “This so-called two-year-old is really the victim of an 18-year case of ADS who will be forced to go through years of suffering and torment before the natural immune system finally copes with it through so-called “natural growth.”

Dr. Rex Clonem of the IPC claims his Institute has come up with a system to cure ADS worldwide.  “Our plan is to take skin grafts from all ADS sufferers and use them to create fully adult clones,” he says.  “Once the adult replacement clones are awakened, the ADS sufferers can be put out of their misery through medical euthanasia,” he says.  In addition, he says the worldwide shortage of transplant organs could be alleviated overnight by harvesting the organs of the euthanized ADS victims.

There would be many social advantages to this system, according to the IPC report.  “For one thing, traditional child-rearing practices result in the inefficient transmission of archaic cultural traditions like ‘religion,’ ‘morals,’ and ‘individual personality,’” the report claims.  “Adult clones can be created free of these flaws and fully indoctrinated with the ruling secret government ideology of technocratic materialism,” the report continues.

The report also says that mild ADS sufferers, “16-19-year-olds,” could be treated with age-enhancing drugs to relieve the residual symptoms.

“This is the most outrageous thing I have ever heard,” says I.M. Mature of the Peter Pan Institute for Eternal Youth.  “These people just want to make money building cloning facilities and selling aging drugs by labeling “childhood” as a disease, when in reality it is a time of carefree innocence,” he says.

Reverend R. Epent of the Pan-Theological Institute for the Promotion of Religious Guilt, for his part, claims that “The Creator makes us suffer through childhood and infancy as punishment for the sins of our past and future lives, and so it would be an abomination for humanity to try to end this suffering.”

“This is a typical Western medical approach to a problem that is best dealt with through natural cures like strong doses of opiates or naturally sourced arsenic,” says Dr. P. Oysonem of the Institute for Dealing with Youth in Asia.

In any case, the IPC admits it will probably take years of lobbying before their recommendations will be put into action.

*Clone News Network

It’s time to remind China of its place

The start today (March 26, 2018) of oil futures trading in gold-backed Chinese yuan is being widely seen as a Chinese victory in the ongoing financial war for control of the planet Earth.  It is also a good time to remind China that the world will NEVER swap Khazarian mafia control for Chinese mafia control.

The West will be eternally grateful for the help provided by Asian secret societies in its battle to free itself from the control of the satan-worshipping Khazarian mafia.  As we will point out, this battle is about to end in victory for humanity.

However, the Khazarians, who should never be underestimated, are appealing to the ego of certain Chinese leaders by promising them the role of Babylonian god-king of the planet Earth.  In exchange for Chinese support, many Chinese leaders are falling for this and dreaming of a Chinese dictatorship over the entire planet.

China thus needs to be reminded of a few things.  The first is that the West still has the power to entirely wipe China out of existence.  The White Dragon Society (WDS) and its allies fought hard to defeat a faction in the West that wanted to do exactly that.  Thus, instead of obliterating China, the West deliberately transferred its industrial and technical expertise in order to help China modernize and develop.  That’s because it was the right thing to do, and because the West wants Asian help in a campaign to end poverty and stop environmental destruction.  Also, China and other Asian countries were helped in their modernization because a deal between East and West for world peace is necessary to end the quarantine the planet earth is now under.  In other words, certain Chinese radical factions need to be reminded that the end goal is to achieve a win-win solution for everybody.

With that in mind, let us now look at the latest news in the ongoing battle for the planet Earth.  On this front, there is very serious brinkmanship going on between the U.S. and China in the run-up to the start of the Chinese Gold/Oil/Yuan (GOY) trading that is rightly being seen as a threat to the petrodollar and U.S. hegemony.

The U.S. reaction was to impose tariffs on $60 billion worth of Chinese imports and hire warmongering radical neocon John Bolton as National Security Adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump.  The U.S. message to China was clearly, “We will stop buying your stuff, cut off your Middle-East oil supply, and use North Korea as an excuse to start war.”  The Chinese reaction, in contrast, was to seek compromise and peaceful negotiation while reminding the U.S. side that it was fully prepared for any eventuality.

Despite the U.S. bluster, a quick look at the cards each side is holding makes it obvious China is likely to emerge as a pyrrhic victor in any trade war.  This can be seen by taking things to an extreme and imagining the U.S. stopping all trade with China, and China dumping all of its U.S. Treasury holdings.  Americans would see an immediate plunge in their living standards as they would lose access to cheap Chinese goods, while a plunging dollar would make imports from the rest of the world more expensive.  Also, it would take many years for the Americans to build factories to replace the goods it is used to getting from China, and the end result would be far more expensive.

China, for its part, would lose access to U.S. soybeans and grains, but would be able to replace these with supplies from sources like Russia and Brazil.  The loss of U.S. dollars earned through its trade surplus with America would also deprive China of a lot of the hard currency it has been using to enhance its power around the world.  However, it is likely that China has set up the GOY trading in part to have a ready substitute for the petrodollars it would lose in a trade war with the U.S.

It is interesting to note, by the way, that one of the most active traders in the first day of the Shanghai GOY trading was the Rothschild firm Glencore.  It is also interesting to note that “around 12 million barrels of Shanghai’s most-active September contract changed hands in the first 55 minutes of trade, more than the most-active contract for Brent.”
https://au.investing.com/news/commodities-news/oil-prices-fluctuate-amid-middle-east-tension-launch-of-shanghai-oil-futures-1061044

On the surface, thus it appears the Rothschilds and their Khazarian brethren were right to side with China against the U.S.  However, if you analyze things on a deeper level, a very different picture emerges.  In this one, the Rothschilds and their fellow Khazarian mafiosi face a catastrophic defeat.

In reality, Pentagon sources say the trade war with China “provides a cover for the U.S. military so that they can crash the stock market and …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Possibly false evidence of Bandar’s suicide

Hi Ben:

One of your subscribers noticed the linked video of Bandar’s supposed suicide.  This was actually an event that took place at Atlanta International Airport on Feb. 28, 2018 as reported by local media:

http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.com/2018/02/28/atlanta-airport-jump-over-railing/

 
onemileatatime.boardingarea.com
The story of a man who jumped over the railing at Atlanta Airport today. He was apparently drunk and threatening other passengers.

A video of this same man linked in your newsletter but uncensored can be found on this Twitter:
https://twitter.com/jaesofamous/status/969003967937118209?s=20

The man who fell off the railing is clearly African-American and was reportedly drunk, so it appears this is not Bandar.  While this does not invalidate Bandar’s suicide outright, the linked video is definitely false evidence.  Of course, there is the possibility that Baaghi is a disinformation campaign.

If this was done on purpose, then please disregard this message.
–N.

 

H.F.1559

LITTLEJOHN

We need a fearless leader to deliver

BREXIT

- Nigel Farage:

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN believes the former Ukip leader should be an integral part of the process after campaigning for so long

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly

Enoch Powell said famously that all political careers end in failure. Nigel Farage should have proved him wrong.

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly.

Up to a point.

The magnificent Leave victory in 2016 was a vindication of Farage’s virtually single-handed campaign to get Britain out of the EU.

Yes, others can also take credit. But Farage was the figurehead, often a lone voice in the wilderness. 

No one had to endure the vilification and violence directed at Farage as he took his message around the country year after year, well before Call Me Dave finally buckled and gave the people a long-overdue referendum.

Fifteen years ago, when I was presenting a nightly show on Sky News, I was about the only broadcaster who would give him a regular platform. The mainstream media treated him as a pariah — at best a circus act, at worst a neo-Nazi. 

This was around the time that New Labour was almost unanimously agreed to have established a 1,000-year reich and opposition to our glorious future as a European statelet was considered futile.

Aside from a few principled players in the Conservative Party — former leader and one-time Maastricht rebel Iain Duncan Smith prominent among them — the political establishment wholeheartedly embraced the EU project. 

But Farage kept banging away, making mischief in Brussels, where he’d managed to get himself elected as an MEP and used his position to ridicule the pompous panjandrums running the show.

Who can forget his wonderful denunciation of the ridiculous Herman Van Rompuy, self-styled former European ‘president’?

‘You have the charisma of a damp rag, and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk . . . Who are you? I’d never heard of you. Nobody in Europe had ever heard of you.

‘I would like to ask you, President, who voted for you . . . oh, I know democracy’s not popular with you lot, and what mechanism do the people of Europe have to remove you?

‘Is this European democracy? You appear to have a loathing for the very concept of the existence of nation states — perhaps that’s because you come from Belgium, which of course is pretty much a non-country . . .

‘Sir, you have no legitimacy in this job at all, and I can say with confidence that I speak on behalf of the majority of British people in saying: We don’t know you, we don’t want you, and the sooner you’re put out to grass, the better.’

The Westminster bubble was horrified. How dare this upstart show such a lack of respect to our European masters? But out in the suburbs and the shires, and on the rundown council estates in the North of England, millions of decent British citizens gave a silent cheer.

Call Me Dave dismissed Farage’s Ukip as a collection of ‘fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists’. It was a cruel caricature, but partly accurate. Ukip’s annual conference certainly resembles a roomful of Hyacinth Buckets and men who model themselves on the Major in Fawlty Towers.

But Ukip was on a roll — and by now Farage was a ubiquitous presence in radio and TV studios, even if he was often only there as an Aunt Sally, to be shouted at by self-righteous presenters and panellists alike.

Yet Farage stood up to the verbal slings and arrows, and to the nasty physical abuse he frequently had to endure. Cigarette in one hand, pint of best in the other, he kept on plugging away.

In the 2015 General Election, Ukip polled almost four million votes, a large chunk of them in former Labour strongholds in the North, which felt ignored and abandoned and had suffered the greatest impact from mass immigration.

Farage’s ‘fruitcakes’ didn’t make a parliamentary breakthrough but they delivered the Tories their first Commons majority since 1992, simply by denying Labour seats they had taken for granted.

Now, Cameron feared, they were coming for the Tories, so he panicked and promised a referendum on EU membership. 

Say what you like about Call Me Dave, but this was his greatest gift to the people of Britain, an opportunity we seized, asserting our sovereignty and overturning the decades-old project of submerging our country into an anti-democratic United States of Europe.

 

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be

Cameron’s gamble backfired. He resigned immediately and is now reduced to scraping a living on the international lecture circuit, essentially a political end-of-the-pier show.

Next week, he’s playing a small town theatre in Florida, but has sold fewer seats than its current production, Million Dollar Quartet, a jukebox musical featuring hits by Johnny Cash, Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins and Jerry Lee Lewis.

In the States, where they value national independence, Farage is a folk hero, a bigger draw than our former Prime Minister.

And yet.

OK, so the referendum wouldn’t have been won without Boris, Gove and the brave career politicians who dared to defy the Establishment stitch-up. But without Farage, there would have been no referendum, nor would there have been any Brexit.

What kind of Brexit, if any, remains to be seen. Which, presumably, is why Farage is now muttering about making a comeback as part of a Ukip Mark II.

The corpse of the old Ukip is still twitching, but without Farage it’s nothing. The party’s on its third post-Farage leader, no one you’ve ever heard of, and he’s on the way out over a few incendiary tweets sent by some dopey bird half his age he’s got himself hooked up with. I can’t be bothered to go into details, because it’s a waste of time.

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be.

One of the reasons Ukip imploded was because those four million voters returned to the two main parties, both of which made manifesto promises to implement Brexit in full, yet now seem hell-bent on either reneging or watering it down so far it becomes meaningless.

So I understand and share Farage’s concern. As I’ve said all along, the fix has been in since the result of the referendum was announced. The political class have stolen our biggest vote in history for anything and made it all about them — not the people they are paid to serve.

Frankly, I don’t trust any of them to deliver the Brexit we voted for. If the vast majority of MPs had their way, they’d stop the whole process in its tracks today. When Theresa May succeeded Call Me Dave, she should have established a grand cross-party coalition to negotiate our departure, including heroic Labour figures such as Gisela Stuart and Kate Hoey.

But the central player should have been Farage, a man who knows his way around Brussels and scares the EU to death.

He’d never have put up with the contemptuous treatment being meted out to Britain by Michel Barnier and his ‘damp-rag, low-grade bank clerk’ bureaucrats.

Instead, we’re stuck with Mother Theresa, who spent the referendum hiding behind the sofa and still won’t say whether she’d vote Leave if it was held today.

Her new de facto deputy, David Lidington, is a full-on federast, already speculating we could rejoin the EU at some stage. Rejoin? We haven’t even left yet — and never will, other than in name only, if the political establishment prevails.

Even David Davis seems to have gone native and Boris has been banished to the outer darkness, certainly when it comes to Brexit. In what kind of Fred Karno government is the Foreign Secretary excluded from the biggest foreign policy issue facing the country in modern history?

Never mind Boris, though. Mrs May should be making plans for Nigel, bringing him into the fold, allowing him to be an integral part of the very Brexit process for which he has campaigned so long, so hard and so selflessly.

He doesn’t need a knighthood, or a sinecure in the Lords — each of which would have been a traditional reward for his service to this country. Given the fuss over Mrs Thatcher’s memorial, I suppose a statue in Parliament Square is out of the question, too.

But what is beyond doubt is that, after Thatcher, Farage is the most influential, most significant British political figure since Churchill — much more so than the Westminster pygmies and time-servers who treat him with unwarranted disdain.

Ukip, the party he led, may be sleeping with the fishes, but if there is any justice, Farage’s career deserves to end in triumph.

Let’s hope Enoch was wrong.

 


Read more:   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5300489/We-need-fearless-leader-deliver-Brexit-Nigel-Farage.html#ixzz55RBjzeYS

 

H.F.1460

 
 

The EU's imploding as nation after nation turns to the ugly Far Right. But Brussels and Remainers just won't talk about it.

 

News for DAILY MAIL-The EU's imploding as nation after nation turns to the ugly far Right. But Brussels and Remainers just won't talk about it.

 

The three young men waiting for a bus outside the Hungarian town of Perbal a few days ago so alarmed one local resident that he called the police.

Surely these were illegal migrants. However, they were anything but. They were students from Sri Lanka, working as volunteers at a home for the mentally disabled.

A minor misunderstanding, perhaps. Except that it is part of a familiar pattern. 

 

Viktor Orban, Hungary's Right-wing leader who has been accused of xenophobia and anti-anti-semitism over  his country's fight against EU migrant quotas

A few weeks earlier, death threats were sent to a man and his car tyres slashed after villagers complained that he was offering a family of migrants a free break at his motel.

International condemnation of this incident in Ocseny in southern Hungary was swift but the country’s Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, assured the villagers that they had his sympathy. 

But then, the Right-wing leader himself has been accused of xenophobia — and even anti-semitism — as a result of his government’s campaign against EU-imposed migrant quotas.

Such is the reality of life on the other side of the EU.

The EU leadership and the European Commission are far too preoccupied with political chaos in Germany and with Brexit to deal with a much greater threat to their grand European dream.

In Britain, bitter Remoaners are fighting a forlorn rearguard battle to try to stop Brexit and sneer at Leavers for their stupidity, seemingly oblivious to the convulsions in the east of the EU. 

Instead of a serene and harmonious Europe of Tuscan villas, Provencal markets, German opera and Bavarian beer halls, we are witnessing rancorous divisions over migration, economic stagnation and incipient independence movements.

And the bitter truth is that in Hungary, the Czech Republic and Poland, there is now a stridently anti-Brussels, anti-migrant and anti-Establishment movement with the increasingly angry peoples of these nations convinced they are being treated as second-class citizens. 

   

More from Robert Hardman for the Daily Mail...

This is a different Europe, too, which has never known multiculturalism and is in no mood to start embracing it now. 

Hence this month’s Independence Day celebrations in Warsaw featured a torch-lit procession by tens of thousands celebrating their ancient Christian heritage. They chanted ‘We want God’ and waved banners with messages such as ‘White Europe’.

Commentators less attuned to Polish traditions and history were quick to accuse these protesters of ‘fascism’. Here in Central Europe, though, the response has been different. According to Poland’s robustly nationalist government, it was ‘a great celebration of Poles’.

The same mood was reflected in the recent elections in Austria and the Czech Republic. Both countries have elected Right-wing Eurosceptic governments — in the wake of the sudden rise of the hard-Right Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD) in Germany.

Indeed, AfD emerged as the third-largest party in September’s elections — meaning Angela Merkel has been unable to form a government and is fighting for her political life.

Even in France, where this summer’s shock election victory by Emmanuel Macron’s centre-Left En Marche movement grabbed the headlines, the fact that the far-Right National Front gained ground while the grand old political party machines collapsed was all but ignored.

The ineluctable fact is that Europe is shifting to the Right. Which is why I am in Hungary, because it is the next EU nation to go to the polls and is emblematic of the new anti-Brussels mood in Central and Eastern Europe.

There is no chance of a lurch to the Right here, come April’s vote, because Hungary lurched that way long ago. Its leader is hated by liberal commentators — not least for the Trump-style border fence he has built to keep out migrants. 

But Orban, like Trump, couldn’t care less. He has no problem with being called ‘populist’, though he prefers the term ‘plebeian’. Even his friends call him ‘The Viktator’.

And he is well on course for victory in next spring’s election which will carry profound implications for Brussels.

Few doubt that Orban will be returned to power with anything less than an overall majority. Indeed, he is fast becoming the de facto leader of the alternative EU.

Predictably, just as the Brussels establishment belittled Brexiteers ahead of last summer’s EU referendum, it is now dismissing the Hungarian leader as an authoritarian Right-wing fruitcake. 

Jean-Claude Juncker, president of the European Commission, has called him a ‘dictator’ and gave him a half-joking slap on the cheek at an EU summit in 2015. 

The thirsty arch-Eurocrat has never forgotten that it was Orban and David Cameron who were the only EU leaders who dared to oppose his appointment.

 

Polish independence day celebrations were marred after far-Right supporters turned out in their hundreds in the capital Warsaw

 

While many in western Europe denounced the marchers as Fascists, at home the event was praised as 'a great celebration of Poles'

But you do not last as long as Orban (he’s already been PM for a total of 11 years) without shrewd political instincts. This former professional footballer — a God-fearing father of five who makes sausages by slaughtering his own pigs — had his first stint as prime minister as long ago as 1998.

He made his name as a young firebrand bravely demanding multi-party elections in Hungary while the Iron Curtain was still standing. Those who like to paint Central Europe’s dramatic turn to the Right as a dark reprise of Germany in the Thirties are missing the point.

No, what goes to the core of Orban’s political DNA — and the current shift across the whole East European region — is a hatred of communism. These are people who remember living under a totalitarian empire less than 30 years ago. Many now regard Brussels and its unelected Commission and unaccountable courts as the new Moscow.

John O’Sullivan, former speechwriter for Margaret Thatcher and now president of the Budapest-based think tank the Danube Institute, says that outsiders fail to understand how deep the scars of communism go.

His biography of Orban recounts how, significantly, the politician was arrested in 1988 as he tried to create his movement. He says Orban’s experience of life under Communist rule has made him ‘much more critical of elites the higher he has risen.’

Indeed, Orban’s great modern heroes are those who brought about the pulling down of the Berlin Wall in 1989 — notably German chancellor Helmut Kohl, US president Ronald Reagan and Thatcher. It is a popular sentiment around here, as I discover in Budapest’s Liberty Square where Orban has erected a bronze statue of Reagan.

Looking closely, I see it is in need of repair. A crack has now turned into a hole in Reagan’s outstretched hand — because so many people come here to shake it. 

If Orban and his Fidesz party win a fourth term, as everyone expects, the old European elite can no longer dismiss what is happening here as mere ‘populism’. A clear dividing line now runs from the Baltic to the Danube and the Black Sea.

On one side are the EU’s wealthier, liberal, multicultural nations such as France and Germany (where, in 2015, Merkel controversially — and to her bitter cost — invited more than a million refugees).

On the other are those whose democracies are, in most cases, virtually brand new — the so-called Borscht Belt, the Goulash Gang, call them what you will — whose social outlook on everything from gay rights to immigration is very different.

In last month’s Czech elections, an Islamophobic party which urged voters to walk pigs past a mosque to protect what it called the country’s ‘democratic way of life and the heritage of our ancestors from Islam’ won 10.7 per cent of the vote. (That is a great deal more than the 7.4 per cent achieved by the Lib Dems in Britain four months earlier.)

The default response in the Western half of Europe is to demand that these ghastly people become better Europeans. But the fact is that these ghastly people are no longer afraid of squaring up to Brussels.

Barely noticed, thanks to the general obsession with Brexit and Catalonia’s bid for independence, has been a recent summit of Central European leaders in the Slovakian capital, Bratislava. 

 

Germany's Angela Merkel is on the brink after coalition talks stalled following a general election which saw her party lose vote share

 

Merkel is being hounded by the AfD, a party founded by neo-Nazis which returned an historic share of the vote amid concerns over migration

It had been convened to tackle a festering cause of anger and injured pride. The specific indignity was the discovery that sub-standard foods had been exported to the former Eastern Bloc which had not been sold in Western Europe.

Orban’s government has described it as the ‘biggest scandal of the recent past’. Just imagine the protests and smashed windows in Scotland if Sainsbury’s was flogging sub-standard food north of the border but not in Surrey. The Bulgarian prime minister calls this ‘food apartheid’.

Although this controversy was about food, it symbolised to East Europeans how they were being abused by Brussels. 

Stung in to action, Brussels has promised to introduce a new food testing regime from next year. Too late. The damage has been done.

It is just yet another example of why Brussels-bashing is so prevalent to the east of the Alps, particularly here in Hungary.

For when Orban started building his razor wire fence along Hungary’s southern border during the migration crisis of 2015, he was roundly attacked.

Hundreds of thousands who had crossed from Turkey into Greece were heading West via Serbia and Hungary. Some were fleeing the Syrian civil war. But many were economic migrants.

Mrs Merkel was hailed as the ‘angel of Europe’ for saying that Germany would welcome the lot. For his part, Orban was branded the villain for closing the door. 

Today, the memory of the chaos of 2015 and subsequent terrorist incidents by Muslim extremists across Europe mean few here question Orban’s decision.

‘Migration is the big issue here, and the EU is now following Orban on migration,’ says Zsolt Jesenszky, a well-known Hungarian entrepreneur. ‘The Left were totally against the fence when it went up saying: “It won’t work”. And guess what? It works.’

Jesenszky, 45, says that the younger generations want leaders who stand up to Brussels, not people who go on bended knee.

‘Hungary likes a guy who stands up to the big bully,’ he says. ‘They’d never vote for a guy like Macron who spends a fortune on make-up.’ 

(Many here remember that the image-conscious French president, who spent £24,000 on a make-up artist in his first three months in office, has been a stern critic of Hungary and Poland.) 

But Orban is more than happy to be attacked by the ‘old’ nations of the EU because they are playing into his hands.

He has now consolidated his position by outflanking the notorious Hungarian nationalist movement Jobbik, infamous for its fascist uniforms and its anti-semitic, anti-gyspy rhetoric.

Jobbik has just performed a U-turn in search of votes from the Left. It is Orban and his Fidesz movement who are now playing the xenophobia card. 

Even some of his supporters think he has gone too far by leafletting eight million households and erecting posters as part of a campaign against Budapest-born billionaire George Soros.

They claim the 87-year-old gave Brussels a plan to flood Hungary with migrants in order to meet labour market needs and bolster the voter base of Left-wing groups.

Orban has ordered Hungary’s security services to investigate a so-called ‘Soros network’ which it is claimed is pulling strings in Brussels. As a result, Orban has been accused of anti-semitism for his demonisation of the great philanthropist.

Born into a Hungarian Jewish family shortly before the war, Soros only survived the German occupation of Budapest with the use of forged papers.

Though now based in America, Soros has been a very generous benefactor to countless Hungarians, having built the Central European University in Budapest. There, I met students and staff appalled to find themselves at the centre of political controversy.

Earlier this year, in a very disturbing development, Orban’s government introduced laws effectively forcing the university to re-apply for its licence to operate. That approval has still not been granted.

It is a bewildering situation. But the new mood in Central and East Europe has its roots in a proud nationalism that Brussels, for years, has tried to marginalise with its vision of a European super-state.

There’s a message for Britain, too. Perhaps all those Remoaners accusing the Brexiteers of being blinkered little Englanders should open their eyes and look at just how rotten much of the EU is now.

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5106147/EU-implodes-nation-nation-turns-far-Right.html#ixzz4zFdkhhrD
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Full article

H.F.1390ONLY A STEADFAST AND UNYIELDING APPROACH TO THE BEAST IN BRUSSELS WILL WIN OUR INDEPENDENCE DAY WITH OUR ACCUSTOMED HONOUR AND DIGNITY IN PLACE.

 
 
 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN!

-'WE ARE AFTER ALL AN INSULAR  ISLAND PEOPLE']

 

*

 

Even Remainers now back a

'hard' Brexit:

 Most Brits ... - Daily Mail

 

. Even Remainers now back a 'hard' Brexit: Most Brits want to regain full control ...
By Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail and Kate Ferguson For Mailonline ... a straight
choice between that and no deal, with 58 per cent backing it.

 

Most Brits want to regain full control of our borders and to become free of meddling EU judges, survey reveals

  • Most polled want the UK to become free of EU judges and full border control 

  • Two thirds said they would prefer 'no deal' rather than a soft Brexit, poll found

  • Findings boost for Theresa May who says no deal is better than a bad deal

Most Remain voters now back a Brexit that gives Britain a clean break from the EU and control back of our borders, a major study has found.

Many of those who voted to stay in the European Union also now believe the country should only pay a small ‘divorce bill’ and stop EU judges ruling over the UK.

The results are a major boost for Theresa May’s Brexit stategy - and suggest diehard Remainers, such as Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable and former prime minister Tony Blair, have overestimated support for backtracking on Brexit. 

Full artical


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782712/Most-Brits-hard-Brexit-new-survey-finds.html#ixzz4pXWhGZDU
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 FREEDOM!

 

.'..We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

Soul of England

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
PETER OBORNE

POLITICS AND POWER

 

PETER OBORNE: Calling for war again, the Neo-cons who drowned the Middle East in blood

One of the most enduring mysteries of the modern world is the continuing influence of the 'Neo-conservatives'.

This is the name given to the political philosophy championed by George W. Bush and his British prime minister buddy, whom he once greeted with the words 'Yo, Blair . . .'

A dictionary definition of 'Neo-conservatism' is 'the assertive promotion of democracy and U.S. national interest in international affairs including through military means'.

Of course, this was the thinking behind the West's invasion of Iraq 15 years ago — a fiasco which I believe was the most morally shameful international disaster of recent times.

Not only did it result in the deaths of hundreds of thousands (including 179 British service personnel), but it also led to years of political chaos in Iraq, to the calamity of the Syrian civil war and the rise of Islamic State.

In any sane world, those responsible would now be pariahs — disgraced and discredited men ostracised by the media and reduced to writing their pitifully self-justifying memoirs.

But we don't live in such sane times.

'Neo-conservatives' is the name given to the political philosophy championed by George W. Bush and his British prime minister buddy, whom he once greeted with the words 'Yo, Blair . . .'

War-monger Blair seems to be a constant presence in BBC studios — this week alone he used the Syria crisis to justify his calamitous invasion of Iraq, arrogantly called for a second referendum on Brexit and basked in praise at an event to celebrate 20 years since the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland.

With breathtaking hubris, Blair urged military intervention in Syria. And with his typically sneering attitude to democracy, he urged Theresa May to authorise the use of the British military without a Commons debate.

He is supported by another man who pig-headedly fails to learn the lessons of history: his chief propagandist, the thuggish Alastair Campbell.

It was the mendacious Campbell, as Blair's spin doctor, who spread falsehoods about Saddam Hussein's 'weapons of mass destruction' and masterminded the use of the notorious dossier on Iraq's weapons to support claims by Bush that gave a spurious justification for Britain going to war.

There is not a jot of contrition from Campbell, who, when not also being given a comfy platform by the BBC, rages about Brexit and at critics of Blair from his splenetic Twitter account.

Meanwhile, the other Neo-conservative in the unwholesome New Labour troika that duped Britain into going to war is relatively silent. It is not hard to guess why.

Peter Mandelson has close and lucrative business connections with one of Putin's cronies. His great 'friend', metals tycoon Oleg Deripaska, along with a number of the Russian's firms, has been placed on the U.S. Government's sanctions list in response to what Washington called Moscow's 'malign activities'.

It is high time Mandelson — a member of the House of Lords — explained publicly the nature of his connections with someone so close to the Kremlin.

But the toxic influence of Neo-conservatism is not just confined to Labour. As a younger politician, former chancellor George Osborne was a junior member of that clique. A leopard doesn't change his spots. Today, he is demanding military action in Syria.

An editorial in the London Evening Standard, which he edits, was as trenchant as it was misguided. It thundered: 'Britain should take part in air strikes against Assad's forces without holding a parliamentary vote.' Across the Atlantic, although no one would ever describe Donald Trump as having a clear political philosophy, his new national security adviser, John Bolton, is a notoriously hardline Neo-con.

As one of the architects of the Iraq invasion, he refuses to apologise for that war. His presence in the White House is an added threat to world peace.

The legendary French diplomat Charles Talleyrand famously remarked about the House of Bourbon that they had 'learnt nothing and forgotten nothing'. The same applies to the Neo-conservatives as they press for the West to intervene yet again in the Middle East. The first and biggest mistake in Iraq was not to have a proper post-invasion strategy. After Saddam fell, the country degenerated into chaos and the region into a furnace of terrorism.

Likewise now, Western governments seem to have little idea of the long-term purpose of any intervention in Syria.

What are the targets? What is their long-term strategy? How do we avoid an escalation into war with Russia? We are not told.

What's more, there are chilling echoes of what happened with Iraq. Blair and Bush ordered military action before weapons inspectors had completed their task. Had they waited, they would have discovered no 'WMDs' and thus no cause for war.

 

Western governments seem to have little idea of the long-term purpose of any intervention in Syria (pictured) 

With regard to Syria, inspectors from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons are due today in the town of Douma, where at least 40 people, including women and children, were killed in an apparent chemical attack last Saturday. They should be allowed to continue fact-finding.

It cannot be stressed too much that military intervention in Syria, like that in Iraq, would be illegal under international law. The warmongering Neo-cons never seem to mind much about matters of legality. But the rest of us should.

For her part, Theresa May, as a member of the opposition, voted for the Iraq war in 2003.

This week, there were welcome signs that she might be erring on the side of caution in Syria.

Undoubtedly she is aware that Britain's defence chiefs are privately reluctant to embark on military action without a clear objective. They understand that things could spin catastrophically out of control.

Some commentators have irresponsibly spoken of a possible 'World War III'. Such feckless talk dishonours the tens of millions who died in the two terrible conflicts of the 20th century.

Nevertheless, there is a genuine danger of an escalation to military confrontation between the United States and Russia.

With such high stakes, I believe it would be a scandal if MPs are not called back early from recess to debate the issue in Parliament.

I rebuked Jeremy Corbyn two weeks ago in this column for being soft on anti-Semitism. But he is right that Parliament must assess all the evidence before Britain embarks on war, as is that Tory big beast Ken Clarke.

Mrs May knows that if she joins Trump in any Syrian military adventure and it goes wrong, she will pay a heavy political price.

The developments of the past days have reminded me of the movie Night Of The Living Dead. It tells how zombies come out of their graves to terrorise people.

This week, we have witnessed several zombies emerge from their political graves to demand this country goes to war with Assad.

The tragedy is, this is real life, not a Hollywood fiction.

Neo-conservatives have turned the Middle East into a charnel house for the past 15 years. I pray they don't get their way again and that wisdom prevails.

*
 

Unsung benefits of the Commonwealth  

Next week, the Queen hosts a meeting of the heads of state of all 53 Commonwealth member countries.

The Commonwealth has many critics, who sneer that it is a meaningless relic of Britain's colonial past. They are utterly wrong.

The Commonwealth brings together 2.3 billion people — almost a third of the world's population — through mutual understanding and shared values.

Unlike Nato, it does not use force to build trust and prevent conflict. Unlike the EU, it does not encroach on national sovereignty.

Instead, it shares values through a relaxed meeting of minds and a common history.

 

The Queen (pictured) will host a meeting of the heads of state of all 53 Commonwealth member countries next week 

The Commonwealth was instrumental in ending military rule in Pakistan in 2007 and was behind the international boycott of apartheid South Africa.

Also, it benefits members' economies — as shown by a study published last week which reveals that Commonwealth members trade 20 per cent more, on average, with each other and generate 10 per cent more foreign investment than other countries.

There is a reason for this. All Commonwealth countries share a form of the traditional British common law. We have the same legal system and any disputes tend to be settled far more easily.

Membership of the Commonwealth is one of Britain's unsung advantages — one that should be harnessed more after

 Brexit.

 



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5614351/PETER-OBORNE-Calling-war-Neo-cons-drowned-Middle-East-blood.html#ixzz5CeUpN2XW
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

H,F.1529

 
 
BREXIT

ANNOUNCEMENT

ARTICLE 50 LETTER

DELIVERED BY

'HER MAJESTY'S AMBASSADOR

TO

BRUSSELS

ON

MARCH 29-2017

*

ON

THE FINAL STRETCH

 TO

 FREEDOM

OF THE

PEOPLE AND NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

[TIME ELAPSED SINCE REFERENDUM IN JUNE-2016

 12 MONTHS

 

JULY-2017- AUG-2019 (?)

JULY 23-2017.

*

 

[No 1]

 

    DAILY MAIL

     

    -MAY: EU MIGRANTS CAN STAY IN UK


    Daily Mail
    May says 3.2million EU citizens CAN stay in Britain after we leave
    Daily Mail - 14 hours ago
    May insists her offer to let three million EU citizens stay after Brexit is 'fair' ... All of
    the 3.2million EU nationals currently in the UK will be allowed to stay ..... in case
    there is a late surge of migrants arriving as Brexit approaches.

    JUNE 23,2017

H.F.1226 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

THE TRUTH that BRUSSELS cannot BEAR:

PEOPLE CRAVE NATIONAL IDENTITY.

What happened in Catalonia on Sunday was shaming and shocking in a modern European state. Spanish police bludgeoned and assaulted defenceless civilians who were simply trying to exercise their democratic right.

First and foremost, this is a terrible crisis for the wrong-headed, bully-boy government in Madrid. After the unedifying spectacle of police attacking blameless voters, the chances must surely have increased of Catalonia – Spain’s most prosperous region with some 7.5million inhabitants – seceding.

But it is also an enormous crisis for the European Union, which in recent weeks has said almost nothing as the Spanish authorities arrested officials arranging an independence referendum on behalf of the devolved Catalan government.

 

 

 

One reason he did not do so in the case of Spain is that it is one of the most obedient pro-EU countries in Europe, which seldom defies the will of Brussels, or causes trouble for Juncker and his ilk.

But there is an even deeper reason for the Commission’s silence. The events in Catalonia challenge at a deep level its project for ever closer union, about which both Juncker and President Emmanuel Macron of France have ventilated in recent weeks.

For how can there be an amicable union between the EU’s nation states if some of those nations are themselves deeply divided and fractious, as is plainly the case with Catalonia and Spain?

Here is a region of largely Catalan-speaking people who regard themselves as culturally distinct. A sizeable proportion of them yearn to break free from Spain, even though Catalonia has been part of the country for hundreds of years.

Sunday’s vote illuminates a truth which Brussels cannot bear. There are many people in Europe for whom the atavistic call of identity counts far more than any exhortation about forging a European superstate

That, after all, was one of the main messages of Brexit – that the majority of voters in our own ancient nation resent the undemocratic control of Brussels, and have no wish to be sucked into a united Europe.

For Brussels, the example of Britain was bad enough, and it has set about trying to punish us for having had the effrontery to want to leave. In a sense, the demonstration of Catalan nationalism is even more alarming to the federalists because this show of independence is happening inside one of the EU’s nation states.

How is it possible, they wonder, for the pan-European project to proceed if some EU countries are in danger of fracturing? The terror in Brussels is that if Catalonia were allowed to break away, regions in other member states could follow suit. Instead of coalescing into an amorphous whole, some EU nations might fall apart.

Belgium, whose capital, Brussels, is the seat of EU expansionism, is divided. The Flemish-speaking region of Flanders, which constitutes about 60 per cent of the country’s population, is at daggers drawn with the French-speaking minority.

Many people in northern Italy long to be rid of the impoverished south, which is relatively unproductive and, in the view of northerners, consumes more than its fair share of government spending. The Right-wing Northern League has campaigned with some success for independence for the north, and imagines a separate country called Padania.

France faces an independence movement in the island of Corsica. Meanwhile the cohesion of Spain is threatened not just by free-spirited Catalans but also by militant Basques, part of whose territory lies in France.

Romania and Slovakia both have unhappy Hungarian minorities. Even in Poland’s region of Silesia, much of which used to be ruled by Germany until 1945, there are stirrings of an independence movement.

All over Europe apparently unified countries are harried by breakaway groups which have a strong sense of separate identity. If Catalonia were allowed to go it alone, who knows what might come next?


 

The problem for Brussels is that it is used to dealing with individual nation states but is powerless to intervene in unruly regions. That is why the Commission has remained so quiet in the case of Catalonia apart from expressing a few words of solidarity with Spain.

By the way, the British response has been regrettably supine. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson stressed his support for the Spanish government in a tweet. As the leading Brexiteer he should surely have been more critical of Madrid’s use of violence.

The Spanish government, it must be said, has behaved rashly and brutishly. Arguably some Catalan separatist political parties have been unwise in deliberately engineering a confrontation.

But given that the Catalan government had made numerous requests to hold a referendum on independence – after Spain’s constitutional court had controversially declared in 2010 that Catalonia was not a nation – what was it to do having been rebuffed time and time again? If it had possessed a modicum of good sense, the Spanish government would have allowed the referendum to go ahead. Had the vote been in favour of independence, it could have then questioned its legal status.

But to arrest Catalan officials, to close a large number of polling stations, and then to clobber innocent voters were acts of unbelievable stupidity as well as nastiness.

It passes understanding how the prime minister of Spain, Mariano Rajoy, can say that democracy has prevailed. The opposite is true.

Imagine if two or three years hence the Scottish National Party’s Nicola Sturgeon were to hold a referendum without the approval of Westminster – by no means an unthinkable eventuality.

In fact, her case would be much weaker than that of the Catalan government since there has already been one legal referendum in Scotland in 2014, which was said by the SNP leader Alex Salmond at the time to be the last for a generation.

Even so, it is inconceivable that a new unofficial referendum in Scotland would be met by the authorities in Westminster with police wielding batons and firing rubber bullets. Such a wild over-reaction would inevitably give a boost to Scottish nationalism – as, I have no doubt, the cause of Catalan nationalism will have benefited from Sunday’s onslaught.

The truth is that the Spanish state has a very restricted conception of democracy. We should know that already from its desire to shoehorn Gibraltar into Spain despite 99 per cent of its citizens having voted in a 2002 referendum to remain British.

God alone knows what will happen now in Catalonia. Unless the Spanish government agrees to an official referendum – an unlikely prospect – there will probably be deadlock. I am afraid there is also the possibility of more violence on both sides.

Justifying and supporting the Madrid government is the European Commission in all its absurdity, dreaming dreams of a union which the people of Europe do not want. It will do its utmost to ensure that Catalonia doesn’t interfere with its grandiose scheme.

Will Remainers look at Catalonia and reflect that we have a quieter and more civilised way of dealing with our differences in this country? I don’t know. What I do know is that every day I am ever more relieved that we are leaving this misguided club.


Full article

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4942684/STEPHEN-GLOVER-truth-national-identity.html#ixzz4uYWX4q7V

Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

 

92

View
comments

 

H.F.1332 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

 

 

A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

HOME

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM? THAT IS YOUR CHOICE

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-June 27,2008]

DEMOCRACY and freedom. It is a fine sounding phrase-rarely off the lips of President Bush as he blunders around the Middle East.

Why do we readily accept that democracy and freedom are natural partners? There is scant historical evidence for it. Often it is a case of

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM: even DEMOCRACY versus FREEDOM.

Consider two examples.  the United States is the only country to have banned alcohol by public demand. Contrast this with Hong Kong. Until shortly before being handed back by

BRITAIN to BEIJING

 it had

NO DEMOCRACY

at all: It was ruled by a colonial governor. Yet enjoyed enviable freedom with one of the least intrusive governments -and flourished wonderfully.

Our own experience also has much to tell us.

BEING A DEMOCRACY HAS NOT PROMOTED PERSONAL LIBERTY.

QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

More than

3000

 NEW OFFENCES

have been created since 1997, and officialdom revels in nearly

300 POWERS OF ENTRY.

Much of this is due to the

EUROPEAN UNION

whose

DIRECTIVES

are rarely scrutinised, let alone debated , by our supposedly democratic representatives.

WHAT we may SAY, WRITE or DO, or whom WE EMPLOY has been increasingly limited. The Government has passed legislation which can make assisting your son's football team

AN OFFENCE.

Another side of our

'democracy'

demonstrates painfully how the public will is constantly flouted. Take the brazen example of voters being

PROMISED REFERENDUM

on

CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

resulting from the

LISBON TREATY

The unscrupulous machinery of government has been deployed to

FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC WILL.

I am not making a party point.

FOR OVER 40 YEARS, GOVERNMENTS OF BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN RESISTING AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC DEMAND FOR CURBS ON

IMMIGRATION.

especially from the

NEW COMMONWEALTH.

 While successive governments have made a show of meeting public demand, they have, quite consciously

REFUSED TO ADDRESS IT

throwing occasional tit-bits to the voters in the hope

THAT THIS WILL KEEP THEM QUIET.

Consider, also, the strong public demand for

CRIMINALS TO BE PROPERLY PUNISHED.

Successive governments, including Mrs Thatcher's have come under the sway of the

'PRISON REFORM'

people -with the result that

CRIMINALS RECEIVE VERY MODEST SENTENCES.

What is more, if they serve a sentence at all, it is in the softest conditions.

IF LYING ON YOUR BED AND WATCHING TV FOR A FEW MONTHS IS THE WORST THAT THE LAW WILL INFLICT

(and that's if you are even caught)

then

CRIME IS WORTH THE RISK

AND

PUBLIC OUTRAGE IS IGNORED.

The explanation is quite logical. Politicians are typically driven by

TWO THINGS.

THE FIRST is the PURSUIT OF POWER

the most exciting thing in the world, or even some say, the first.  If this urge is not there when they start their political careers

THEN IT SOON TAKES OVER.

THEIR SECOND MOTIVATION -to give our politicians their due - is the DESIRE FOR REFORM, IMPROVE the condition of the PEOPLE.

But the catch here is that most politicians

 THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE FAR BETTER THAN THEMSELVES.

THEY FORM AN ELITE

WHICH LISTENS TO

OTHER ELITES

Or perhaps, since the word elite sounds flattering, we should say

THEY FORM A CASTE.

 

Politicians do not wake each morning wondering whether they are meeting the public will.  They turn to the media to learn what is said about them in newspapers and on the radio by other members of the

NATIONAL ELITE

- the selectorate, the clattering classes, the scribblers, the intellectually fashionable, call them what you will.

 

For elites to be out of touch is not unusual, even inevitable. The desire to be 'in' with the 'right' people is common with politicians; their weakness is for approval (and fame).

Of course, there is one moment when public opinion cannot be ignored -and that is at an

ELECTION

As Rousseau observed, voters are truly free

ONLY

 ON

ELECTION DAY.

But , by then, all the issues are jumbled up, and the voter finds himself choosing between

TWO COMPLEX and CONFUSING MENUS.

And while it is clearly advantageous for a party to offer the public

WHAT IT WANTS, the fact that both main parties say MUCH THE SAME THING..

-and make similar insincere

PROMISES

makes a mockery of any claim to be driven by

PUBLIC WILL.

 

BUT  the ALTERNATIVE to our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM politicians say in horror, would be GOVERNMENT by REFERENDUMS. With 'horror' because it would take power from THEM and give it to THE PEOPLE.

BUT WHY NOT?

The Swiss have made a suburb success of it. Referendums are required on national and local issues if enough voters petition for them and they often do. As a result, the Federal Government, like  the local CANTON administrations, proceeds with CAUTION in case its plans are overturned by a PUBLIC VOTE. . .

To acknowledge that our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, which has developed over the centuries, NO LONGER WORKS -MAY BE PAINFUL. But if you put that to a REFERENDUM,

MOST VOTERS WOULD HEARTILY AGREE.

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

 *

HOME

[brought forward from June-2008

AUGUST-2008

*

[ 'IN JANUARY 2018 we can look back over 10 years and see that the situation with regard to many matters mentioned above has got progressively WORSE! Whether it is IMMIGRATION-POLICING-LAWS...The only GOOD NEWS is that we are only just over a year away from leaving the monstrous soon to be containment camp known as the EU SUPER-STATE a plan of ADOLF-HITLER in 1940 for GERMANY to dominate Europe in the PEACE .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[brought forward from June-2008

 

 
 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
(Jeff )RENCE.COM  TRUTHCONTROL.COM/  

WHATDOESIT MEAN.COM

 

 

HUMANS ARE FREE

CLIMATE CHANGE A HOAX-TRUMP KNOWS IT-NOW YOU KNOW IT!

The Rothschilds.
 

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; AND WASTEFUL CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

HEALTH SLOT!

MEN

STILL DYING

OF

EMBARRASSMENT'

 

 

 

About 5,350,000 results
 

    News for DAILY MAIL-MEN STILL DYING OF EMBARRASSMENT


    Daily Mail
    Prostate cancer victims still dying of embarrassment
    Daily Mail - 14 hours ago
    Men are still dying of prostate cancer because they are too embarrassed to visit a
    doctor, a study of patients in England has revealed.

 

 

    News for DAILY MAIL-LET'S SAVE 7,000 LIVES A YEAR

    Let's save lives of 7000 prostate cancer sufferers a year
    Daily Mail - 3 days ago
    Boosting prostate cancer funding to match cash for breast cancer could save the
    lives of 7000 men a year, according to Prostate Cancer UK.

 

Daily Mail

CAMPAIGN

 

FEBRUARY 3, 2018

H.F.1464

 

 

 

 

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018