- (1994 -Official Website - JUNE-PT 6- 2018 )-

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018          JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018          JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018          JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

 

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

MAY 2, 2018

 

Trust your admirable instincts, Mrs May, and reject this absurd fudge -which risks a total breakdown in trust between the public and political elite...

*  *  *

[MRS MAY IS A REMAINER AND A BREXITEER NO WAY!

WHO HAS HAD HER DAY BECAUSE THE EU CUSTOM UNION IS STILL IN PLAY.

ONE CANNOT COMPLAIN BECAUSE IN THE CHOOSE OF LEADER

 PRINCIPLE AND FREEDOM ARE ON OPPOSITE SIDES.

ONLY A BREXITEER CAN WIN THE DAY

AND RETRIEVE OUR FREEDOM AND COUNTRY

TO WHICH WE ALL BELONG

WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY

OUR WAY!]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 MAY 2, 2018
 

WE ARE STILL LEFT WITH THE NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN VS WINSTON CHURCHILL SYNDROME.

VICTORY!

 CAN ONLY BE WON IF THE ROAD TO ITS ACHIEVEMENT IS LED BY A

BREXITEER.

MAY 2,2018

 

H.F.1542

 

 

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

 

[IT WAS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME! FOR THIS ARTICLE TO BE PROVED CORRECT. MAY 8,2018]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

aily Mail

 

 

 

Mother Theresa or Maggie May?

 

(Only time will tell!)

 

 

 

by Richard Littlejohn

 

EXTRACT

THIS column doesn't do honeymoon periods. So if you're expecting me to join in Mother Theresa's coronation celebrations, you've come to the wrong place.

Regular readers will need no reminding that I don't exactly share this newspaper's enthusiasm for our next Prime Minister.

Her record at the Home Office is far less impressive than her cheerleaders pretend.

SHE FAILED MISERABLY TO CONTROL  IMMIGRATION;

didn't DEPORT

 FOREIGN CRIMINALS BACK TO THE EU COUNTRIES

and reappointed the appalling

Bernard Hyphen-Howe as Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police

As for her alleged leadership qualities, she backed the

LOSING REMAIN CAMPAIGN

even though she had always given the impression that

 SHE WAS EUROSCEPTIC

and then spent most of the campaign hiding behind the sofa.

Her obligatory contribution to

PROJECT FEAR

was to warn that

BRITAIN WOULD BE SAFER AND STRONGER INSIDE THE EU.

presumably, now that

WE'VE VOTED OUT

she believes

WE ARE WEAKER AND MORE VULNERABLE.

Curious how Boris was accused of acting out of personal ambition when he chose to  lead the BREXITEERS.

Yet no one suggested Theresa  might have been similarly motivated when

SHE OPTED FOR REMAIN.

Don't forget the majority of Conservative MPs were also in the REMAIN CAMP.

which most people expected to win.

So by staying loyal to the official line, she would have been handily placed to run as the establishment candidate when Call Me Dave called it a day.

Does anyone seriously believe that cynical calculation didn't cross her mind when she was working out which way to jump in January?

As it is, the keys to No 10 have fallen into her lap after the implosion of the Leave leadership.

Andrea Leadsom, who wisely withdrew yesterday, was an accidental candidate and stood scant chance of winning. She was only left holding the shredded standard when Michael Gove detonated his suicide belt, taking Boris with him.

It's no good Leadsom complaining that she was subjected to a concerted dirty tricks campaign.

THAT'S POLITICS. IF SHE COULDN'T COPE WITH PERSONAL ABUSE, SHE'D NEVER CUT IT AS PRIME MINISTER....

 

 

[WE AGREE WITH EVERY WORD THAT RICHARD LITTLE JOHN HAS STATED-IT WAS A BETRAYAL AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN REWARDED. IF THE NEW GOVERNMENT IS TO MEAN SOMETHING THEN IT SHOULD NOT BE TARNISHED FROM ITS BEGINNING. ALL WE CAN HOPE FOR IS THAT MRS MAY NOW KNOWS THAT MILLIONS WHO VOTED TO LEAVE THE CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-COSTLY-UNACCOUNTABLE-UNDEMOCRATIC NIGHTMARE CALLING ITSELF THE EUROPEAN UNION WHEN ACROSS THE LENGTH BREADTH OF THAT BEAST'S PLACE OF CAPTIVITY MILLIONS OF PATRIOT NATIONALS  ARE UP IN ARMS DEMANDING THEIR COUNTRY BACK!- WILL EXPECT NO FALTERING IN EXPEDITING OUR EXIT FROM CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE-POST HASTE!  AFTER 43 YEARS TO RETURN TO OUR LONG ACCUSTOMED ETHOS AS WORLD TRADERS-THE WORLD OUR OYSTER!]

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 12-2016

H .F.914 FREEDOM NOW!

 
 
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

SEPTEMBER 28-2016

 

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

FEBRUARY-2016

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Happy New Year: Hundreds of top Khazarian mobsters, including the Bush family, renditioned to Gitmo

 

In a historic moment of poetic justice, most of the U.S.-based top perpetrators of the fake “war on terror” have now themselves been renditioned to the U.S. Navy camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Pentagon sources say.  “The Rothschild assets George Soros, Peter Munk, Peter Sutherland, the Bushes, the Podestas, and many others may have been airlifted to Gitmo for military tribunals, as the Department of Defense spends $500M to upgrade the prison and send more military police and Marines,” the sources say.

In one of many signs of just how historic the new American revolution is, “30 congressmen will not be returning in the new year,” the Pentagon sources say.  CIA sources also confirm that former U.S. President Bill Clinton, hoping for a plea bargain, is spilling the beans on people like former CIA head John Brennan, top U.S. Mossad agent Rahm Emmanuel, former Vice President Dick Cheney, and many others.

Furthemore, as U.S. President Donald Trump proclaims Janaury 2018 to be “Anti-Slavery Month,”
 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-proclaims-january-2018-national-slavery-human-trafficking-prevention-month/

… human trafficking centers around the world are being raided and shut down.  In Saudi Arabia, 3,000 child sex slaves have been freed, according to Russian FSB sources.  In the U.S., “there was a power outage on December 27th at the “pedo heaven Disneyland,” as the place was raided by special forces fighting human slavers, the Pentagon sources say.  In apparently connected events, Washington Post heir Bill Graham and Jordan Feldstein, the brother of the actor Jonah Hill, died last week, the sources point out.

Another move was that Julian Assange “was extracted from the Ecuadorian Embassy to take down the cabal, and he may be pardoned along with Mike Flynn,” the sources add.

Also, “On Christmas day, Delta Force raided a mansion owned by former President Barack Obama in …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Merry Christmas:  The 13 “Illuminati” bloodline families sue for peace

Peace on earth and goodwill to all (and not just men, but all life forms) is looking like a realistic goal for 2018 now that the 13 “Illuminati” * bloodline families, seeing their ancient rule of planet Earth collapsing, are suing for peace.  Last week a representative of the G7 (Germany, the U.K., the corporate U.S., Japan, Italy, France, and Canada) met with a representative of the White Dragon Society (WDS) to discuss peace terms, according to a WDS member who was present at the meeting.  The G7, of course, is the political front for the 13 bloodline families.  There can be no doubt that this meeting was made possible by people inside the military-industrial complex acting in the spirit of Jesus Christ, and for this we wish them all “a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.”

The bloodline offer to negotiate peace is directly connected to the state of emergency that was declared last week by USA President Donald Trump.  If you have not seen it yet, please read the historic document in the link below.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-congress-united-states-6/

“After Hanukkah, Trump declared a state of emergency and signed an executive order on December 20th freezing the assets of those accused of human rights abuses and corruption, a catch-all to bankrupt the Bushes, Clintons, Soros, Obama, the Cabal, and the global Jewish mafia,” was how a Pentagon source summed up the situation.

“The national emergency allows Trump to seize assets and unleash the military to carry out mass arrests and adjudicate via military tribunals, effectively imposing martial law,” the source continues.

The Pentagon source also sent a copy of this photograph with the explanation, “Trump wears purple when unveiling his national security strategy on December 18th in a victory lap over the Soros/Hillary purple revolution, and drinks water with both hands to simulate handcuffs.”

Clearly reacting to this situation, the representative of the bloodlines set the meeting for December 23rd, the birthday of the Japanese Emperor, and claimed to be a representative of the Imperial family as well as the G7.  The representative, who acted as if he was negotiating a surrender, said the bloodlines want to keep existing nation-states and institutions as they are, but…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Letter to the Editor – Experimental Quantum Anti-Gravity Successfully Replicated

 

I would like to let you know that my anti-gravity experiments have been successfully replicated by the Aerospace Engineering Department at the New Sciences & Technologies Faculty of the University of Tehran in the Islamic Republic of Iran. I have developed complete quantum anti-gravity hypothesis with direct testable predictions that are simple, clear, easy, and inexpensive.

As you know, present-day quantum gravity theories suffer from too many mathematical space dimensions, and from too few conclusive experimental results.

My hypothesis is simple, clear, and subject to easy empirical verification.  I offer clear explanation of the principles of quantum gravity, and also precisely describe how to perform simple and inexpensive experiments to verify it.

In order to clearly understand quantum anti-gravity, please follow these 8 steps:

  1. Start from this brief overview — Quantum Gravity in a Nutshell
  2. The theoretical basis for quantum gravity are the Abraham’s equations of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy, and their empirical counterpart — the Abraham force
  3. To understand how the Biefeld-Brown effect works, you need to be clear where B-B vectors point — “up” or “down”
  4. The Biefeld-Brown effect is an instance of the Abraham force.
  5. Study the section about gyroscope’s anomalous effect.
  6. Please, study all the material on THE BOYD BUSHMAN EFFECT page in order to appreciate the potential complex magnetic fields have for shaping quantum gravity interactions.
  7. Now, you are ready to read the short introduction to quantum gravity.
  8. Perform two simple experiments for empirical verification.

The following are the 10 “mysteries” that my hypothesis sheds new light upon:

  1. The main prediction of my hypothesis (2016) is that anti-hydrogen will anti-gravitate.
  2. Gravitational waves mystery.
  3. EmDrive mystery.
  4. Solar mystery.
  5. Mass mystery.
  6. Bicycle mystery.
  7. Propeller  mystery.
  8. Cloud mystery.
  9. Pioneer mystery.
  10. Missing mystery.

I have designed 4 progressively more complex experiments, and we have successfully performed one of them, the one of medium difficulty, which constitutes:

The empirical discovery of hitherto unknown physical interaction between angular momentum of a spinning gyroscope and Earth’s magnetic and electric fields.

To perform this experiment, we need a gyroscope with a vertical support, and magnetic and electric shielding cages.

According to my hypothesis, there will be a measurable time difference between a freely spinning gyroscope inside, and outside the cages.  A gyroscope freely spinning inside both cages will come to rest in less time than when spinning outside them.

The experiment was performed successfully and was recorded in the following two videos:

To have a clear idea what is involved in the experiment, please take a closer look at the above two videos first.

For the experiment, we used the following small and light gyroscope at 10,000 rpm:

It would be much better to use a heavier gyro, because the heavier the gyro, the stronger the effect, at the same rate of rpm.

The value of angular velocity (rpm) is important only insofar as to generate sufficient angular momentum to allow the gyro to spin freely for a longer time before it comes to rest.

The objective of the experiment was to obtain two values of the gyro’s run time:

  • Outside the shielding;
  • Inside the shielding.

In my experiment, the two sample values are, respectively:

  • 55.54 seconds
  • 51.87 seconds

There was a 3.67 second difference, which amounts to 6.6%.  The time difference is directly proportional to the quality and quantity of electrostatic shielding of the Faraday cage. Applying the magnetic shielding in addition to the electric one would further increase the time difference.

As you can see in the video, it is important that the gyro is elevated by means of a vertical support.  Ideally, gyro should start spinning as close to a vertical position as possible, and also be able to pass lower, while still spinning, than its horizontal position.

The reason for this effect is that the gyroscope inside the cages will be spinning in reduced strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, which in turn reduces the strength of the Biefeld-Brown effect acting upon it.

The gyroscope outside the cages, spinning in the undiminished strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, is subject to the full influence of the Biefeld-Brown effect that causes the gyroscope to resist Earth’s gravity pull, which happens to be none other than pure natural antigravity effect.

OBJECTIONS

  • All conductors, like the brass gyro, exhibit an effective diamagnetism when they experience a changing magnetic field.  The Lorentz force on electrons causes them to circulate around forming eddy currents.  The eddy currents then produce an induced magnetic field that opposes the applied field and resist the conductor’s motion.

—  That is true for both, the gyro spinning inside and outside the Faraday cage in Earth’s magnetic field.  It does not make any difference.

  • But the gyro’s induced magnetic field will generate eddy currents in the Faraday cage and the resultant magnetic field will slow down gyro’s spin (magnetic breaking), and hence the whole effect.  It is like dropping a magnet down a copper pipe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dFFL8TDt2Q

—   The analogy in the video applies, but only in principle.  Spinning brass gyro is not a strong neodymium magnet, and if, in principle, it generates any magnetic field, it is so weak that it will not even affect a needle of a compass.  As opposed to the copper pipe in the video, the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage has much larger diameter (the inverse-square law), so it is enough to drop a strong neodymium magnet down the Faraday cage to see how much it would slow down, if at all.  As you can see in the above video, even few empty slits in the copper pipe greatly weaken the eddy currents, this being the reason for using enamel-coated copper mesh.  Diamagnetic materials, like brass, or copper, have a relative magnetic permeability that is less than or equal to 1, and therefore a magnetic susceptibility less than or equal to 0, since susceptibility is defined as χv=μv−1.  This means that diamagnetic materials, in principle, are repelled by magnetic fields.  However, since diamagnetism is such a weak property, its effects are not observable in everyday life.  Moreover, there is a big difference between Faraday cage made of solid copper, and one made of enamel-coated copper mesh.  The magnetic field induced in the gyro is weak, because Earth’s magnetic field is weak, so whatever little eddy currents could be induced by the gyro in solid copper Faraday cage will become irrelevant in the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage, as you can see in the following two videos:

Even though it is true that the experiment, in principle, is open to influences from various phenomena, including the Carnegie curve, the overall result is clearly well beyond being attributed exclusively to these other phenomena.

To completely eliminate above objections, magnetic shielding needs to be applied in addition to the Faraday cage, and the gyro should be custom-made from a material which does not allow for eddy currents to flow in it.

Naturally,  I will be happy to answer any questions that you may have for me regarding the theoretical foundations as well as replication of the experiment.

With respect and much gratitude,  I am
Sincerely yours,

U.S. troops deploy worldwide with 10,000 sealed indictments to take down Khazarian mob

U.S. President Donald Trump spent the weekend at Camp David with his top generals to map out the exact strategy for decapitating the Khazarian mafia worldwide, say Pentagon sources.  “The Atlanta airport was shut down, while the Department of Defense refused to disclose the locations of 44,000 U.S. troops who may be involved in terminating the cabal worldwide,” a senior Pentagon source said.  There are now close to 10,000 sealed indictments as more and more of the Khazarian criminals give up evidence on their colleagues, the sources say.

There are also many extra-judicial killings going on.  “The liberal sanctuary city mayor of San Francisco, Edwin Lee, dropped dead after an illegal alien was found not guilty in the murder of Kate Steinle even after his confession,” one source notes.  “Lee’s death is a message to the Democrats and sanctuary city mayors like Rahm Emmanuel of Chicago and Bill De Blasio of New York City,” the source warns.

The Khazarian mob is also killing off lots of people.  In Japan, two former executives of Toshiba, Atsutoshi Nishida and Taizo Nishimura, suddenly died in the past two months because they were about to provide evidence about the March 11, 2011 Fukushima tsunami and nuclear terror attack against Japan, according to sources close to the royal family.

This attack was carried out by henchmen of the Rockefeller family, whose members include Hillary and Bill Clinton, the sources say.  The Rockellers, in turn, were taking orders from the fascist P2 Freemason lodge, they say.  The Rockefeller family, by the way, has elected Mel Rockefeller, the son of Nelson Rockefeller, as the new family head, these sources added.

In Canada, Barry Sherman, owner of the Canadian pharmaceutical giant Apotex, was found hanging dead alongside his wife Honey by the family’s indoor pool.  According to CIA sources, Sherman was …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

H.F.1430

 

Dr MAX

THE MIND DOCTOR

 

NHS psychiatrist Max Pemberton may make you rethink your life.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The truth is

our jails are holiday camps...with drugs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

 

When did you first start using drugs?’ I asked the man sitting in front of me.

He thought for a moment. ‘About two years ago,’ he said.

I looked down at his notes. ‘About the same time you went to prison?’ I asked. He nodded.

 
 

Drugs are now so rife in prisons that, according to a Royal College of Nursing report this week, staff have required hospital treatment for accidentally inhaling fumes from spice

‘I first tried heroin in prison,’ he said. ‘I got hooked. I started to do a lot of crack in there, too. And cocaine.’

‘But hang on,’ I interrupted. ‘You were in prison.’

The man laughed at my naivety. ‘It’s easier to score drugs in prison than it is outside, mate.’

This conversation, which took place a few years ago, was with my first patient in the drugs clinic I had started working at. The clinic was near a large prison and, on release, every convict with a history of substance abuse was sent to me. This man was the first of many I saw who not only used drugs while in prison, but became an addict there.

In fact, during the time I worked in that clinic, I saw more people who had become addicts while serving time than those who had been addicts beforehand. 

Drugs are now so rife in prisons that, according to a Royal College of Nursing report this week, staff have required hospital treatment for accidentally inhaling fumes from spice — the so-called ‘zombie drug’, a form of synthetic cannabis — while treating inmates.

Last year, 16 prison officers from Holme House prison in County Durham had to take time off after breathing in spice smoke in the cells.

 

Prison officers from Holme House prison in County Durham had to take time off after breathing in spice smoke in the cells

For today’s inmates, it seems, prison is an opportunity to sit, stoned off your face, watching TV while someone else does your cooking for you. It’s a holiday camp with drugs. And that’s not my view — but what patients have told me time and time again.

As one said, prison is not a deterrent; it’s a nice break from the realities of life.

Probably one of the most shocking things I heard was from one young man, not more than about 20, who said he’d rather be in prison because the drugs he could get inside were better quality than the stuff being sold on the streets.

I can’t be alone in thinking this is utter madness. How can it be that our prisons are now places where it’s easier to break the law than it is outside? What kind of warped message is this giving to those we lock up? Isn’t this the very antithesis of what prison should be about?

It would be easy to blame the wardens, but it’s not their fault. Many have spoken to me about their frustration at what they see. Health care staff tell of the utter futility of trying to implement change because they are not supported from above.

This is one of the reasons prison staff retention is so poor — people come with the idea that a prison is a place of rehabilitation, but soon realise it’s little more than a holding pen. Staff leave in droves, meaning that many prisons are understaffed, which further perpetuates the problem.

 

One young man said he’d rather be in prison because the drugs he could get inside were better quality than the stuff being sold on the streets

One nurse who worked in a prison told me that staff know all too well who is bringing in drugs, and how.

He said dealers would sometimes throw dead pigeons stuffed with drugs over the prison walls to be collected by inmates and their contents distributed.

Mobile phones are everywhere, he explained, so co-ordinating this kind of activity is easy. There have even been cases of drones dropping off supplies.

Wardens see it all, but are powerless — there aren’t the staff numbers to quell the aggravation caused when they try to clamp down. Nor is there the political will to stamp out the problem.

But let’s be honest — it’s not that difficult to stamp out. If airports can prevent people smuggling drugs onto flights, then surely a prison can do the same.

But in order to put in place effective mechanisms to stop the torrent of drugs flooding into prisons, the Government has to decide that this is a priority.

HM Prison and Probation service needs to make a firm commitment that it is going to clamp down on drugs in prisons and do so with immediate effect. Otherwise we are making a mockery of the justice system.

Prison shouldn’t simply be a punishment. It should provide an opportunity for people to reflect on their crimes and to make positive changes in their lives.

What it most certainly shouldn’t be is a place which turns people into drug addicts. 

 
 

A shortage of nurses, it was estimated this week, is costing the NHS £2.4 billion a year. That’s money that could be spent on patient care and treatments, rather than being poured down the drain paying exorbitant agency fees. But, for once, the solution is easy.

First, Brexit provides a wonderful opportunity to recruit nurses from outside the European Union. Once we have control of our borders again, we can decide who to allow into the country. And top of my list would be nurses.

Get them to commit to a minimum of five years’ work in the NHS in exchange for being allowed in.

Second, it’s important we nurture our own, home-grown nurses. Last year, fees were introduced for nursing degrees and grants were scrapped. This has seen a significant drop in applications.

Of course, no one becomes a nurse because of money, but it’s criminal that nursing students are graduating with vast debts. We need to send a clear message to those who want to train to be nurses that we value their vocation.

Scrap the fees and reinstate grants. Now.

 
 

Blair's to blame for hospital shop rip-offs

What a disgrace. WH Smith has been selling 80p toothpaste for £8 in a hospital shop. Although the retailer has since said it was a pricing error, and has donated the money made from the sales to a charity, exploitation of the sick is nothing new.

In a hospital where I worked that had a similarly eye-wateringly overpriced WH Smith, nursing staff would often pop out to the supermarket on their lunch break to get basic necessities, such as toiletries, for patients.

 

A £7.99 toothpaste for sale at Pinderfields General Hospital in Wakefield

Why do hospitals allow this to happen? This is a legacy of Tony Blair and — with the introduction of Foundation Hospitals in the early 2000s — the insistence that hospitals become profit-generating businesses.

There are only so many ways a hospital can actually make money and most have hit upon two things: car parking and renting out the space in the foyer to corporations.

It’s the latter that explains why the entrance to many hospitals now resemble shopping malls.

The casualty in this has been the much-loved League of Friends shops, usually staffed by volunteers, who wanted to give something back, often as a thank-you to the hospital who helped them.

Every time I pay £2.50 for a coffee in hospital, I think of the League of Friends who not only charged 20p but would throw in a biscuit, too.

 
 

The way to end abuse 

I’ve been spat at, punched, kicked, sworn at, had knives pulled on me and twice been held hostage during my career as a doctor. Sadly, my experiences are far from unique. There’s no doubt that those on the frontline of the NHS bear the brunt of some atrocious behaviour.

 

Things are so bad that this week, at the Royal College of Nursing congress, it was suggested that NHS staff should be fitted with body cameras in an attempt to keep them safe.

While attacking members of staff is unforgivable, the more pressing issue is not the staff abused by patients, but rather patients abused by staff behind closed doors.

I’m thinking of the elderly, the mentally ill or those with learning disabilities — the most vulnerable members of society — who are on the receiving end of horrific abuse and neglect, particularly in care homes.

The vast majority of abuse cases that come to light do so because families have placed a camera in their relative’s room. We should now start installing this as routine. In fact, if we could put them in every room, abuse would stop practically over night.

We’d weed out the perpetrators and allow those who really care to get on with their jobs.

Yes, it’s awful that we even need to consider action like this, but sadly, as so many scandals have shown, it’s crucial that we do.

 
 

Don't tell patients to 'fight' cancer  

Macmillan, the cancer charity, has warned against telling patients to ‘fight’ cancer, saying that talking about the disease in terms of a battle leaves sufferers feeling guilty for admitting fear and often prevents them from planning for their death.

Having worked on a cancer ward where I witnessed this for myself, I couldn’t agree more.

I saw how the idea of ‘fighting’ cancer made some people feel a failure when their condition became terminal.

It’s easy to see why. The words we use to describe cancer are the words of war. The cells ‘invade’ and we ‘fight back’. We have an ‘arsenal’ of treatments to ‘defeat’ it. Cancer is the ‘enemy’.

Why do we talk about cancer in this way? Because it offers us a false reassurance that the disease is something we can fight against. By using words such as ‘fight’ and ‘win’, we suggest the patient is responsible for their own recovery when, in reality, the success of cancer treatment relies on drugs, radiotherapy or surgery, not willpower.

It’s also a great deal down to luck — at what stage it was caught, whether it has spread, what organs are affected and so on.

And it’s this arbitrary nature of the disease that makes us profoundly scared. By using active words suggestive of a war, things seem less random. But the flip side is that it implies that, when someone doesn’t win the battle, they are to blame.

Even if we never say this outright, it’s often how those with cancer feel. You should have fought harder; you were not a good enough opponent. This isn’t true. Sometimes cancer is terminal and that’s no one’s fault, certainly not the patient’s.

 


Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5746387/DR-MAX-MIND-DOCTOR-truth-jails-holiday-camps-drugs.html#ixzz5Fxz28b1j

Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  *  *  *

[OUR DEMOCRACY IS GOING TO POT ! BECAUSE TOO MANY SUPPOSED SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE HAVE DECIDED TO TAKE AS MUCH OUT OF THE PUBLIC PURSE TO SATISFY THEIR GREED THAT ANY TRUE DEMOCRATS THAT STILL EXIST ARE FINDING THAT ONLY A COMPLETE CHANGE OF PERSONNEL AND SHORT PARLIAMENTARY TERM OF SERVICE WILL BRING BACK TRUE SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE. THE GROWTH OF QUANGOES OVER THE PAST DECADES HAS ASSURED THE GOOD -LIFE! FOR THOUSANDS OF POLITICAL CRONIES WHO LOOK FOR A REWARD TO LAST  THEIR YEARS AT THE EXPENCE OF THE HARD PRESSED TAX PAYER. THE PROBLEM IS THAT  THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE FEEDING AT THE GOVERNMENT TROUGH WHILE URGENT NEEDS ARE IGNORED OR DELAYED FOR YEARS.  THE PEOPLE ARE THE SHAREHOLDERS AND SHOULD ENSURE THAT THE WASTE OF  REVENUE IS BROUGHT TO  A FULL-STOP NOW!

THE  ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ABOUT BREAD AND GAMES. WELL! WE STILL HAVE THE GAMES WITH OUR PRESENT POLITICAL SYSTEM. AS FOR THE BREAD OF SORTS! WE HAVE A LEAN TIME ,WHERE WE NEED IT  MOST!]

 

*

 

H.F.1552.

 

[A TOTAL WASTE!  OF PUBLIC MONEY!

 WHEN THERE ARE CUTBACKS IN POLICING AND SHORTAGE OF STAFF FOR THE NHS APART FROM THE MILLIONS OF POTHOLES IN OUR ROADS ANDS MANY OTHER ESSENTIAL NEEDS WHICH CANNOT BE FUNDED.

AS WE HAVE MENTIONED IN THE PAST A GOVERNMENT SHOULD AS A FAMILY BUDGET ON THEIR EXPECTED EARNINGS. BUT WE HAVE NUMEROUS INSTANCES WHERE THERE IS NO PLANNING YEARS AHEAD FOR INCREASED IMMIGRATION.

AS WE HAVE SAID SO OFTEN IT IS ALL ABOUT

NUMBERS!

 IF YOU INCREASE IMMIGRATION YOU  MUST HAVE IN PLACE JOBS-HOUSES-NURSES-AND A HOST OF OTHER MATTERS FOR IT TO SUCCEED

BUT WHAT WE HAVE BEEN EXPERIENCING IS A CONTINUOUS ATTEMPT TO CATCH UP!.

THE MAIN PROBLEM IS THE WASTE OF SCARCE MONATARY RESOURCES BY GOVERNMENT AND THE BBC-QUANGOS AND MANY OTHER ORGANIZATIONS RECEIVING MONIES FROM THE PUBLIC PURSE!-YOUR TAXES!

IT IS A ALICE IN WONDERLAND SENARIO IN A REAL WORLD-THEY DO NOT GO TOGETHER

 

FIX-IT!

DAVID CAMERON!]

 

[comment in brackets are ours!]

 

*

 

THE COSTLIEST FIFTY QUANGOS - MANY WASTE YOUR MONEY.

 

DAILY MAIL

THE COSTLIEST FIFTY

 

Legal Service Commission       £2.1bin

Scottish Further Education

Funding Council                             500m

National Council for Education

& Training in Wales                       500m

North West Development Agency  400m

Youth Justice Board for

England & Wales                            385m

London Development Agency        351m

Yorkshire Forward                          326m

Biotechnology & Biological

Sciences Research Council             268m 

Advantage West Midlands              263m

South East England Development

Agency                                            140m

East Midlands Development Ag.    120m

National Criminal Intelligence Ser. 100m

South West Of England Regional     

Development Agency                      100m

Countryside Agency                          95m

Central Police Training &

Development Authority                    74m.

Sector Skills Development Agency  65m

Carbon Trust                                     59m

Natural History Museum                  39m

Re: Source The Council for

Museums/Archives/libraries             39m

Learning & Teaching Scotland         37m

Commission for Patient & Public

Involvement in Health                       34m

General Social Care Council             30m

British Educational communications 

& Technology Agency                      30m

Adult Learning Inspectorate              29m

Police Information Technology         

Organisation                                      26m

UK Film Council                               24m

UK Sport                                           23m

Scottish Commission for the

Regulation of Care                            19m

Competition  Commission                16m

Disability Rights Commission          16m

Gas & Electricity Consumer

Council                                              13m

Qualifications & Curriculum

Authority                                           12m

Children & Family Court                  

Advisory & Support Service             10m

East England Development Agency   9m

Consumer Council for Postal

Services                                               9m

Standards Board for England              8m

Criminal cases Review Commission   8m

Scottish Social Services Council         7m

Loch Lomond & the Trossachs

National Park                                       5m

Cairngorms National Park Authority  4m

 

Office of the Immigration Service       

 Commissioner                                    3m

Care Council for Wales                       3m

Health & Safety Executive for

Northern Ireland                                  3m

Scottish Screen                                    2m

The Gaelic Development Agency       2m

Independent Motoring Boards of

Prisons & Immigration

Removal Centres                                 2m

Health Professions Wales                    2m

Water Industry Commissioner

For Scotland                                        1m

Statistics Commission                         1m

 

TOTAL COST     (  including the other 61 new quangos-the above figures in many cases are down –not up to the nearest million )    FEB/05                   £6.5bn            Click for Report.

FEB/2005

 

 

COST OF QUANGOS

 

    Quangos - The TaxPayers' Alliance

    https://www.taxpayersalliance.com/quangos-ge2017

    17 May 2017 ... Whilst the coalition government promised a 'bonfire of the quangos', abolishing
    192 and merging a ... 4:20 PM 14, May 2018 James Price.

     

    Is FE counting the cost of a quango crisis? | Tes

    https://www.tes.com/news/fe-counting-cost-quango-crisis

    Should we cut the FE quangos down to size? ... It is a challenge to come up with
    useful metaphors for quangos, but, just maybe, these organisations are a bit like
    those exotic plants that the ... And it would all come at a cost. ... 18 April 2018 ...

     

    Quangos 'need to rise from ashes' to plug Brexit regulation gap ...

    https://www.publicfinance.co.uk/.../2018/.../quangos-need-rise-ashes-plug-brexit-regulation-gap

    16 May 2018 ... Hillier, also Labour MP for Hackney South and Shoreditch, said she could not
    estimate the cost of bringing back the quangos but believed it ...

     

    Shrinking NHS quangos will liberate staff and save money - CapX

    https://capx.co/shrinking-nhs-quangos-will-liberate-staff-and-save-money/

    17 April 2018 ... Cutting down the number of NHS quangos could save taxpayers
    nearly £800m; Two reforms that can help free ... If NHS England is in charge, why
    does it need a raft of independent bodies attempting to do their job for them?

     

    The fate of quangos | The Institute for Government

    https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/fate-quangos

    Early on in my civil service career, I worked on the abolition of the Greater
    London Council (GLC). One of the Thatcher government's charges against the
    GLC ...

     

    More than 600 health quango chiefs on six-figure salaries amid NHS ...

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/.../600-health-quango-chiefs-six-figure-salaries-amid-cash-crisis/

    5 Mar 2017 ... ... main health quangos are now employing 628 officials on salaries of at ....
    That's unsurprising as we've cut the running costs of the NHS by 50 ...

     

    Boom in quangos costs Britain £170bn a year - Telegraph

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/.../Boom-in-quangos-costs-Britain-170bn-a-year.html

    19 Aug 2007 ... Sunday 13 May 2018 | UK News feed · Home · Video ... Boom in quangos costs
    Britain £170bn a year. Ken Boston ... In total, the 883 quangos listed cost £167.5
    billion in 2005/06, up from £24.1 billion in 1997/98. The Ministry ...

     

    Merging NHS quangos could save almost £800million, damning ...

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/.../slashing-nhs-management-bodies-would-improve-efficiency/

    Updated: 16th April 2018, 10:30 pm. MERGING NHS quangos could save almost
    £800million, a damning report by the TaxPayers' Alliance finds. Slashing the ...

     

    Quangos cost taxpayer £124bn | Daily Mail Online

    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article.../Quangos-cost-taxpayer-124bn.html

    24 Sep 2006 ... The cost to the taxpayer of running Britain's sprawling empire of quangos has ...
    Friday, May 18th 2018 12AM 73°F 3AM 68°F 5-Day Forecast .... In reality
    Government spending on quangos has spiralled, and the latest official ...

     

    NHS could save £800million a year by slashing the number of ...

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../NHS-save-800million-YEAR-slashing-number-quangos.html

    Published: 20:24 EDT, 16 April 2018 | Updated: 06:50 EDT, 17 April 2018 ... In
    2017 there were 100 staff on more than £150,000 in quangos overseen by the .....
    Kieran Hayler shares a sweet tribute to Katie Price's son Harvey on his 16th ...

     

 

 

Brought forward from FEBRUARY 2005

 

 

THE COSTLIEST FIFTY QUANGOS-MANY WASTE YOUR MONEY.

 

*

KINGS and QUEENS of BLIAR’S QUANGOS

 

 

[PATRONAGE GALORE!]

 By

 

Tim Shipman

Political Correspondent

 

Daily Mail

Tuesday November 14 -2006

 

 

LABOUR was accused last night of creating a generation of QUANGO cronies who owe their highly paid public jobs to their links with Tony Blair and his PARTY.

 

A Tory dossier was published  detailing 20 friends and allies of the Prime Minister who earn up to £300,000 a year from jobs handed out by the GOVERNMENT.

  

The top ‘Quango King’ is Lord Smith the former Culture Secretary who was last week appointed Chairman of the Advertising Standards Authority, a lucrative post that entitles him to pocket £120,000 for a maximum

THREE DAY WEEK.

 

Between them, the 20 members of the Quangocracy have held 83 public posts under this Labour Government, six have worked directly for the Labour Party and five are currently

 LABOUR PEERS.

 

Another Sir Christopher Evans, has been arrested in connection with the

 

‘Cash For Peerages Scandal’

 

-which is expected to lead Scotland Yard detectives to quiz the

 PRIME MINISTER

 

Shadow Culture Secretary Hugo Swire said:  This latest appointment confirms Tessa Jowell as the

‘QUANGO QUEEN’

 

-handing out lucrative posts to

LABOUR SUPPORTERS.

 

‘ THE number of vested interests in these appointments is quite astounding. These people are:

 

UNELECTED

 

UNACCOUNTABLE

 

-Although they preside over huge swathes of the

PUBLIC SECTOR.

 

‘Its completely unacceptable that they are ALL LABOUR CRONIES.

 

THE CRONIES WHO CASHED IN UNDER LABOUR

 

 

1. Chris Smith One post-chairman Advertising Standards Authority, £120,000 p.a. (two or three days a week)

 

Crony Credentials:  Labour peer, Culture Secretary 1997-2001, Labour MP for 20 years.

 

2.  Chal Patel:  Six posts including the Better Regulation Task Force.

 

Crony Credentials:   Loaned £1.5 million to Labour in 2005. Nominated for a peerage in 2005.

 

3.           Sir Christopher Evans:  Five posts including Tony Blair’s Science and Technology Council.

 

Crony Credentials:  Biotech tycoon loaned £1,000,000 to Labour in 2005.

Arrested in connection with the

 

‘Cash for Honours Scandal’

 

 

4.           Heather Rabbatts: Six posts including Non –Executive Director of the Bank of England, worth £6000 p.a. for six meetings.

 

Credentials: Married to former lobbyist, Mike Lee who worked for David Blunket in the 1990’s.

 

5.           Sir Ronald Cohen:  Six posts including chairman of the Social Investment task Force.

 

Credentials: Gordon Brown’s chief fundraiser has donated £1.3 million to the Labour Party.

 

 

6.   Jonathan Kestenbaum:  Two posts including Chief Executive, national Endowment for Science, Technology and Arts worth £103,000 p.a.

 

Crony Credentials: Chief of Staff to Ronald Cohen.

 

7.

7.   Chris Powell:  Four posts including chairman National Endowment for Science Technology and Arts worth £23,000 p.a.

 

Credentials: Brother of Jonathan Powell, Tony Blair’s Chief of Staff.

 

 

8.   Larry Whitty: Three posts including Board member, Environment Agency worth £15,000p.a. for two days a month.

 

 

Credentials:  Labour peer and former General Secretary of the Labour Party.ls:

 

THE FOLLOWING LIST WAS COMPILED IN FEBUARY 2005 THEREFORE WITH RISING COSTS AND INCREASED PATRONAGE AVAILABLE THE FINAL QUANGO FIGURE WILL BE SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED.

 

*

 

THE COSTLIEST FIFTY QUANGOS - MANY WASTE YOUR MONEY.

 

THE COSTLIEST FIFTY

 

Legal Service Commission       £2.1bin

Scottish Further Education

Funding Council                             500m

National Council for Education

& Training in Wales                       500m

North West Development Agency  400m

Youth Justice Board for

England & Wales                            385m

London Development Agency        351m

Yorkshire Forward                          326m

Biotechnology & Biological

Sciences Research Council             268m 

Advantage West Midlands              263m

South East England Development

Agency                                            140m

East Midlands Development Ag.    120m

National Criminal Intelligence Ser. 100m

South West Of England Regional     

Development Agency                      100m

Countryside Agency                          95m

Central Police Training &

Development Authority                    74m.

Sector Skills Development Agency  65m

Carbon Trust                                     59m

Natural History Museum                  39m

Re: Source The Council for

Museums/Archives/libraries             39m

Learning & Teaching Scotland         37m

Commission for Patient & Public

Involvement in Health                       34m

General Social Care Council             30m

British Educational communications 

& Technology Agency                      30m

Adult Learning Inspectorate              29m

Police Information Technology         

Organisation                                      26m

UK Film Council                               24m

UK Sport                                           23m

Scottish Commission for the

Regulation of Care                            19m

Competition  Commission                16m

Disability Rights Commission          16m

Gas & Electricity Consumer

Council                                              13m

Qualifications & Curriculum

Authority                                           12m

Children & Family Court                  

Advisory & Support Service             10m

East England Development Agency   9m

Consumer Council for Postal

Services                                               9m

Standards Board for England              8m

Criminal cases Review Commission   8m

Scottish Social Services Council         7m

Loch Lomond & the Trossachs

National Park                                       5m

Cairngorms National Park Authority  4m

 

Office of the Immigration Service       

 Commissioner                                    3m

Care Council for Wales                       3m

Health & Safety Executive for

Northern Ireland                                  3m

Scottish Screen                                    2m

The Gaelic Development Agency       2m

Independent Motoring Boards of

Prisons & Immigration

Removal Centres                                 2m

Health Professions Wales                    2m

Water Industry Commissioner

For Scotland                                        1m

Statistics Commission                         1m

 

TOTAL COST     (  including the other 61 new quangos-the above figures in many cases are down –not up to the nearest million )    FEB/05                   £6.5bn          

    FEB/05 

 

Our tax burden is worst for 20 years

                   

 

HOW FAMILIES ARE CLOBBERED

 

4.7m People pay income tax of 40% or more, up from 3.1 million in 2010

 

 

 

£1,671 The average Band D council tax bill after a 5.1% increase in April 2018

 

 

 

 

28% Proportion of the income tax take that comes from the top 1% of taxpayers

 

 

 

£9.5bn Amount that home buyers paid in stamp duty last year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1552/1

 
 

News for DAILY MAIL-UK pays worst state pension in the developed world

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension in the developed world with a basic payout of £122.30 a week

  • The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West 
  • Former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get worse 
  • Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found.

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings – and last night former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get even worse.

Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70, while future payments could be cut even further to avoid needing massive hikes in national insurance, Baroness Altmann said.

 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found

The league table revealing Britain's pension shame was compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which analyses the world's industrialised nations. 

Out of all the countries compared, Britain comes bottom – even behind poorer nations such as Chile, Poland and Mexico.

While the UK's state pension is worth just 29 per cent of average earnings, in France the equivalent figure is 74.5 per cent. 

Germany's state pension is worth 50.5 per cent of average earnings, while in the USA it is 49.1 per cent. 

The most generous state pension in the world is in the Netherlands, where the payments are slightly higher than average earnings.

 

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings. File photo

Baroness Altmann warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it. 

She said: 'We are one of the world's leading economies, but our support for the oldest in society is not fit for purpose.

'In April 2016, major reforms to the UK state pension were supposed to have made the system affordable for the future, reducing its generosity. Beyond the 2030s, the new state pension will be lower than the old system for most people and the lowest paid, predominantly women, will lose significantly from the new system.

'Despite this, the Government has been advised that the costs of paying state pensions will soar so much over the next 20 years and beyond that further cuts could be required.'

From later this year the state pension age for women will rise from 63 to match men at 65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.

Baroness Ros Altmann (pictured) warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it

The Government's economic forecasters, the Actuary's Department, believes it will become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the 2060s.

This would mean that anyone aged 30 or below now will not get their state pension until they are 70, while those under 20 will have to wait until they are 71.

Baroness Altmann added: 'The Government actuary believes that just funding the UK's exceptionally low state pension will require reducing payments in future or dramatic tax rises. Policymakers face difficult decisions and are also likely to need to increase the state pension age further.'

The former pensions minister called on the Government to do more to address the crisis, including making private pensions more attractive so that more people are willing to pay a portion of their wages into their own fund.

'To avoid burdening younger generations with significant tax rises, it is vital that more is done to boost private pension saving,' she added. 'Auto-enrolment is a good start, but the pensions industry needs to attract more customers to pay more into their pensions.' 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5379521/Britain-pays-retirees-worst-state-pension.html#ixzz56thYQdgc
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[IT IS IRONIC THAT IT WAS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHICH INTRODUCED THE STATE PENSION  OVER A HUNDRED YEARS AGO BY WINSTON CHURCHILL YET AS SHOWN ABOVE IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY BOTH THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES TO THE PRESENT LEVEL AS THE POOREST PENSIONERS OF THE 24 DEVELOPED NATIONS WITH A PERCENTAGE OF THE AVERAGE WAGE OF 29PER CENT-WHEREAS THE TOP NATION NETHERLANDS PAYS 100.6 %. WITH THE CITY MILE BEING BAILED OUT WITH 45 BILLION OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY.]

-A GREEDY SQUARE MILE AND PARSIMONIOUS STATE PENSION YET OUR OVERSEAS AID IS SQUANDERED AND WASTED WITH THE CHARITIES IN THE MAIN GAUGING THEMSELVES WITH HIGH LIVING-AND NOW WE HEAR EVEN PROSTITUTION IS CONSIDERED A PERK OF THE JOB.  THERE APPEARS NO ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT OF CHARITIES TO ENSURE THAT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE FOR THE TRUE NEEDY NOT FOR FUN AND GAMES AND TERRORISTS OR HIGH LIVING OF THOSE RECEIVING THE TAXPAYERS HARD EARNED REMUNERATION WHILE MANY OF THE CONTRIBUTORS ARE IN GREAT PAIN AND MANY DYING WHICH COULD BE GREATLY REDUCED IF CHARITY BEGAN AT HOME.  TO BOAST OF BEING THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO OVERSEAS AID WHILE A GREAT NUMBER OF OUR CITIZENS PARTICULARLY THE POOR AND A NUMBER OF THE ELDERLY  ARE SUFFERING IN ORDER THAT THE TOP OF THE FOREIGN AID LIST IS MAINTAINED.

HOW IS IT THAT THE OTHER 23 NATIONS CAN PROVIDE A HIGHER STATE PENSION? WHAT IS PREVENTING WESTMINSTER FROM BRINGING OUR STATE PENSION UP TO AT LEAST THE AVERAGE OF THOSE ON THE LIST BELOW WHICH CONTAINS MANY NATIONS WHICH CAN HARDLY BE  CONSIDERED RICH COMPARED TO THE UK. IS IT THAT IN THOSE COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE ARE

 PUT FIRST! - NOT LAST?

THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE FEEDING OFF THE PUBLIC PURSE WITH THEIR OBSCENE RATES OF SALARY AND GOLDEN PENSION-POSSIBLY SO LONG AS THEY ARE COMFORTABLE THEY HAVE NO THOUGHT FOR THOSE WHO PAID FOR THEIR LAVISH LIFESTYLE?

PAYOUT AS PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE WAGE
Netherlands   -  100.6%

Portugal        -   94.9%

Italy             -  93.2%

Austria         -  91.8%

Spain             -  81.8%

Denmark        -  80.2%

France            -  74.5%

Belgium          -  66.1%

Finland         -  65%

Czech Republic-60%

Sweden         -  54.9%

Canada          -  53.4%

OECD average=62.9

 

Germany    -    50.5%

USA            -    49.1%

Norway      -    48.8%

Switzerland    -    44.9%

New Zealand   -  43.2%

Australia     -    42.6%

Ireland        -   42.3%

Chile         -     40.1%

Japan           -  40%

Poland       -      38.6%

Mexico         -     29.6%

UK  -  29%

Source-OECD

 

H.F.1478

 

 A GIANT PONZI SCHEME THAT DESERVED TO GO TO THE WALL

...even though Carillions collapse

 shames CAPITALISM

and puts the wind in Labour's sails says ALEX BRUMMER

 

News for DAILY MAIL-A GIANT PONZI SCHEME THAT DESERVED TO GO TO THE WALL by ALEX BRUMMER

 

ALEX BRUMMER: A giant Ponzi scheme that deserved to go to the wall... even though Carillion's collapse shames capitalism and puts the wind in Labour's sails



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5273135/ALEX-BRUMMER-Carillion-deserved-wall.html#ixzz54RK5sa9n
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The collapse of the Wolverhampton -based construction group Carillion is catastrophic for its 43,000 employees at home and overseas, for the Government and for members of the stricken pension fund.

It represents a nadir for the private sector outsourcing companies which, since the era of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, have been relied upon to deliver all manner of public services, from building hospitals and schools to modernising the NHS and even providing school meals.

In the fierce scramble for business among these behemoths, Carillion was so desperate for contracts that it consistently overpromised on the work it could do for an agreed cost. When it failed to deliver on time and on price, as was the case with the new 646-bed Royal Liverpool hospital, the group went on a borrowing spree.

 

More than 20,000 jobs in the UK, and more overseas, are at risk after Carillion ran out of time to find a way to restructure its £1.5bn debt burden. Pictured: A staff member outside an office in London

Its debts grew to £900 million, an impossibly large sum to manage when its share price was going into freefall during the course of last year.

Plunge

In effect Carillion, chaired by former water company boss Philip Green, had become a mammoth Ponzi scheme in which the cash promised or received for newer contracts was effectively being used to cover up the black holes on the older contracts.

Why Carillion has careered into crisis 

The Wolverhampton-based firm, the backbone behind a raft of public infrastructure projects, is teetering over a precipice.

The company is the second largest construction firm in the UK but has debts of about £1.5billion and a pension fund shortfall of almost £600million. 

So how has it got into this mess? Most analysts agree that the answer is simple. It has over-reached itself.

Carillion they argue has its fingers in too many pies at homes and abroad from the Battersea Power station redevelopment in the UK to operations in Canada, the Middle East and the Caribbean.

The company's incessant desire to expand has resulted in it pursuing too many risky contracts - some accompanied by questionable accounting practices - that have become increasingly unprofitable. 

It has furthermore faced delays in payments in the Middle East.

The firm in recent months has found  it much harder to manage its mountainous debt pile and pension deficit.

In December Carillion managed to persuade lenders to give it more time to repay them. But the company's banks are now understood to be unwilling to lend it any more cash.

What is unconscionable in all this is that over the past two decades, before its troubles emerged, Carillion paid out vast sums in dividends to shareholders (seeking to keep them sweet) and bonuses to fat-cat directors — including former chief executive Richard Howson, dismissed last July — yet allowed the pension fund deficit to balloon to an officially estimated £900 million.

The burden of sorting this out will now fall squarely on bail-out body the Pension Protection Fund, which is financed by raising a levy on the functioning pension schemes into which millions of us contribute.

Among the more astonishing aspects of the scandal is that even as Carillion’s share price plunged in the second half of last year, Transport Secretary Chris Grayling, as well as other ministers and civil servants, still felt it was safe to gift the firm new contracts. City investors and hedge funders had already recognised that the company was struggling for survival and could no longer pay its thousands of suppliers in good time. If ever there was a case of the Government throwing good money after bad, this was it.

The business-friendly Tory Government, deliberately or naively, awarded Carillion three new contracts within days of the company admitting several major projects had gone wrong to the tune of £800 million — an announcement that provoked a 30 per cent plunge in the group’s shares last July.

A week after that first public warning that it was all going to hell in a handcart, Grayling’s department revealed that Carillion would partner another construction group on a £1.4 billion contract to work on the flagship £56 billion HS2 railway project.

Days later, Carillion was told by the Ministry of Defence it had been chosen to provide ‘catering, retail and leisure’ services for 233 military facilities. These contracts provided some temporary relief for the firm’s books.

But confidence in Carillon’s ability to manage the crisis, in spite of the new contracts, was fading fast, and in September it warned again that profits would fall short of expectations.

Yet the Government still gambled that it was a good bet, and awarded it a key infrastructure project to electrify the railway connecting Corby in Northamptonshire with London.

Ironically, the contracts for these large-scale, taxpayer-funded projects were given out at a time when Carillion’s chief executive and finance director were departing, and the share price was tanking. Yet Whitehall, in their naivety, sailed serenely on.

The collapse of Carillion comes hard on the heels of the decision by Virgin Trains and its partner Stagecoach to hand back the East Coast railway service to the Government, at a potential taxpayer cost of £2 billion. These two disasters have not only left the Government looking very silly, but also given a fillip to those supporters of Jeremy Corbyn on the Left who are convinced capitalism is wicked, and that only re-nationalisation of public services is the answer.

 

Carillion workers lined up outside a staff office to check on the status of their jobs in London yesterday morning

Sure enough, Shadow Cabinet Office minister Jon Trickett has been quick to exploit the misfortunes of Carillion’s workforce and pensioners, asking what ‘due diligence measures were undertaken before awarding contracts worth billions of taxpayer money’.

Failure

What he failed to acknowledge is that the most enthusiastic embrace of private outsourcing companies came during the last Labour government, which used firms such as Carillion to replace Britain’s Victorian hospitals, to build modern schools, expand universities and begin the process of updating the nation’s railways and roads.

Much went wrong at Carillion, including the failure of highly paid auditors KPMG to lay bare the company’s parlous financial state.

But then independent directors and major investors failed to question a record dividend payout to investors of nearly £80 million in 2016, even as the company headed for the rocks and the huge shortfall in the pension fund grew ever larger. (Labour MP Frank Field, who chairs the Pensions Select Committee, castigated Carillion for taking on ‘mega borrowings while its pension deficit ballooned’.)

None of these attacks can be very comfortable for Baroness (Sally) Morgan, former political secretary to Tony Blair, who joined the Carillion board as an independent director in June 2017, shortly before the fateful disclosure to the stock market that the company was in deep trouble.

The collapse of Carillion also shines a light on the wider outsourcing industry, and the ability of huge private firms to be responsible capitalists when they are given hundreds of millions in public money.

Other companies including Serco, Mitie, Balfour Beatty and G4S have all experienced difficulties with Government contracts: there has been a tendency for them to take on too much and become financially over-stretched.

Stupidity

With the help of experts in company turnarounds, some have managed to clean up the contracts under their management and bounce back.

But it’s too late for Carillion, which ran its affairs in a helter-skelter, irresponsible manner, yet still managed to keep the Government on side until the very end. Some have questioned why the Tories chose not to bail the firm out in the way it seems to have done with the train companies running the East Coast line.

But that surely would have sparked public fury — after all, if capitalism is to survive and thrive as Britain’s chosen economic model then weakness or stupidity must not be allowed to flourish.

Of course, Carillion’s collapse is a dreadful blow, and even now it will prove expensive for taxpayers, who will have to fund the company’s most vital operations until the insolvency practitioners can sell on the contracts.

But it would be a serious misjudgment if this debacle were used as an excuse for bringing an end to the role of private enterprise in building more efficient public services.

Enterprise and ambition in business have been the lifeblood of Britain for centuries. What a shame that it took the collapse of Carillion to remind us how it should not be done.

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.1439

 

EXPOSING

 THE WORLD

REVOLUTION

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

 

WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE AS 'THE NEW EUROPEAN SOVIET

 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

EXPOSING THE WORLD REVOLUTION

 

HOW THE BERLIN WALL

'COLLAPSED' [?]

 

EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT

 

RAISING THE STAKES: TWO STUDIES IN GERMAN OBTUSENESS

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

THE NAZI INTERNATIONAL 'S PLAN IS BROUGHT INTO THE OPEN.

 

NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES

 
THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS –
WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

The Haushofer-Hitler and Kennon-pentagon blueprints for Germany are shown by this comparison.

 

Previous Speaker of the House of Commons-1976-83

 supports our Ancient Constitution

 

DID YOU KNOW?

EU

DISCLOSURES

No's

1-32

 

Confound their politics; Frustrate their knavish tricks.

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

PRESIDENT OBAMA NEEDS TO WATCH THE ACTIONS OF THE

 INSTITUTE OF POLICY STUDIES

HIS NEIGHBOURS ON CAPITAL HILL.

 
GORBACHEV'S INSISTENT CONFESSION OF

HIS COMMUNISM

Why

EU

Regional policy will destroy

the

Nation State

 

EUROPEAN BILATERAL TREATIES DRAFTED BY THE GRU -SOVIET INTELLIGENCE.

 
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

 

1418/1

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 

A PEOPLE WHO IGNORE THE PAST HAVE NO FUTURE

 

THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL

*

Death knell for the euro (and the crisis that could EVEN DESTROY the EU)

by

Christopher Booker

 

WOMEN GETS CRIMINAL RECORD FOR SELLING FRUIT AND VEG BY THE POUND

 

DEFENCE OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

THEIR FREEDOMS & LIBERTIES

 
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND
Ten

EU truths we must tell the public
 

-NO MATTER THAT CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH HER MAJESTY

WASTED NO TIME IN SELLING THE

the accustomed

"RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN"

 

GERMAN CHANCELLOR PUTS GERMANY FIRST-

GORDON BROWN PUTS THE EU

FIRST.

 

SEVENTY YEARS AGO NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN SIGNED THE NOTORIOUS MUNICH AGREEMENT TO BETRAY CZECHOSLOVAKIA AND DELIVER

' PEACE IN OUR TIME'

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN
WANT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM AND COUNTRY- THEN READ ON

The remarkable views of Declan Ganley

The multi-millionaire founder of

www.Libertas.org

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE . 

What a colossal con trick they have played on the people of the once INDEPENDENT NATION STATES of the Island of BRITAIN.

LATEST!

eurofacts:-5th September,2008

Hurrah for Libertas!

FOR IRISH EU

'NO' VOTE
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

STATEMENT!

IS THE FOUNDER OF LIBERTAS WHO LED OPPOSITION TO LISBON A FEDERALIST EUROPEAN NOT A EUROSCEPTIC?

eurofacts 19th September, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE . 

EU FAILS TO SIGN-OFF ACCOUNTS FOR 14TH YEAR RUNNING

WHAT DOES GORDON BROWN DO?-NOTHING!
There are certain Principles of Civil Liberty, which at the end of the fifteenth century protected the Individual from the arbitrary action of the government.

DAVID CAMERON NOW GIVES FIRM PROMISE OF EU REFERENDUM -CAN WE TRUST HIM?

Regrettably the answer is NO!

But after much obfuscation and stating his decision to stand down at end of term he relented in 2016
SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

CIVIL WAR

[Extract taken from Mr David Brown's book above]

[ALSO see below for THE END OF THE ENGLISH.

 

SLY OLD FOX-ARCHITECT OF EU CONSTITUTION - SUGGESTS SPECIAL TERMS FOR BRITAIN.

DON'T TRUST THEM

POLITICAL COURAGE IS NOT AMONG THE QUEEN'S MANY VIRTUES.[The Queen could have at the least privately insisted that HER MINISTERS give HER once FREE SUBJECTS a REFERENDUM or NO EU TREATY

SHE DID NOTHING!

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

 

 

 

1418/2

 

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE .

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

 is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 

HOW A WORLD WAR RESULTED FROM A DRIVER TAKING A WRONG TURN?

*

Stumbling into conflict, third time unlucky

by

Andrew Alexander

 

THE IDEA OF A SINISTER GLOBAL ELITE CONTROLLING EVENTS HAS LONG BEEN THE STUFF OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES-[AND WITH MUCH JUSTIFICATION].

*

DEATH OF PATRIOTISM

by

Leo McKinstry

 

THE NAZI INTERNATIONAL  PLAN IS BROUGHT INTO THE OPEN.

No 3

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

www.worldreports.org

 

DO YOU KNOW?

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member States

www.edwardharle.com

 
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

How many people work for the European Union?

The ANSWER is NOT as stated in the EU pamphlet and blazed about by the Government minister Denis MacShane and the Independent which SHOULD KNOW BETTER.]

 

Hurrah for Libertas!

 

eurofacts:-5th September,2008

DAVID OWEN

DEVON

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE .

eurofacts

No:89

5th September, 2008

Review by Ian Milne

of 'The Triumph of the Political Class'

by

Peter Oborne.

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

www.worldreports.org
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE

ESTABLISHED

IN MADRID IN 1943

By

HEINRICH HIMMLER

 

 

PETITIONS TO NO10

DEMANDING A REFERENDUM ON EU

It is time the EUROSCEPTIC factions created a WAR COMMITTEE united under one LEADER.

As we have stated on many occasions in the past the Eurosceptic organisations are without a War Committee led by a General such as Sir Michael Rose -ex SAS command who would be the pivot point of the entire Eurosceptic opinion in the country.

 

POLITICAL COURAGE IS NOT AMONG THE QUEEN'S MANY VIRTUES.

PART of EXTRACT

from

WHO KILLED BRITAIN

by

A. N. Wilson

 

SLY OLD FOX-ARCHITECT OF EU CONSTITUTION - SUGGESTS SPECIAL TERMS FOR BRITAIN.

'I fear the Frenchman even  though he offer gifts'.

THEY never give up.  THEY they can't afford to because without Britain the cost to the German engine driver and French fireman of the EU Collective Express would topple the EU.

 
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

THE END OF TRUTH - HOW WE CAME TO LOSE OUR CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY

 
LISBON

TREATY

IS

DEAD

by

Lord Neill of Bladen

Why our English Self-Government is unique in Europe and the World.

As one of many who attended the Collegiate Church of Saint Mary in Warwick for the Funeral Service of The Rt. Hon. J. Enoch Powell (1912-1998) it was a great honour to be present with many to hear of the life of one of our nations great Patriots.

 

THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?

*

Gordon Brown states before a packed Parliament that it has now signed six

EU TREATIES

so

A REFERENDUM is NOT NECESSARY

WELL!-HE IS WRONG! 

SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

THE WAY WE ARE?

Over our long history we have rarely made a mistake of colossal magnitude such as our foreign affairs with the American colonies in the 18th century and the question of Ireland which is still not completely settled after over 400 years.

BUT IN JUNE 2008 THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

WERE BETRAYED BY QUEEN-COMMONS and LORDS.

TREACHERY BY A PRIME MINISTER WHO SIGNED THE LISBON TREALITY BUT COULD HE NOW DITCH THE POUND

*

eurofacts 31st October -2008

Gordon begged to be let in, says Luxembourg Finance Minister.

 

The CORONATION OATH ACT of 1688

declares

OATH TAKEN for the PURPOSE of MAINTAINING our SPIRITUAL and CIVIL RIGHTS.

Can the QUEEN veto the New EU Treaty?

'YES!'

 

AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED

HOW a  supposed FREE PRESS failed to FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOM.

But are they finally gradually moving towards greater disclosure of the iniquities of the EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE?

OUR VERDICT IS THEY HAVE AS YET ONLY PUT THE TIP OF THEIR TOE INTO THE REVOLTING CREATURE.

BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

 

 

 

 

1418/3

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE .

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

 is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK.

 

 
 Empires have gone and most people in the world now live in Nation-States said Lord Shore 

Separate Ways   

by    

 [LORD} Peter Shore -

Why EU Regional policy will destroy the Nation State

*

 

The Breakdown of Europe -by Richard Body

 
WHY de Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP IN 1963

The Rotten Heart of Europe -

by

Bernard Connolly-Part 1

 
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS

RODNEY ATKINSON

 

A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk now than any time in it’s over a Thousand years of history.

Almost everything, which is most precious in our Civilisation, has come from small States.

European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

Britain must leave the EU as UN show best area for expansion will be USA-Anglo/Saxon sphere.

 

NOR SHALL MY SWORD - THE REINVENTION OF ENGLAND

 

WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON IN 1996 -EURO DOOMED TO FAILURE

 

Ninety-nine countries will soon have Free Trade with EU -without paying a cent to Brussels.

 
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

LETTER from Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, to Edward Heath, prior to the acceptance by Parliament of the “Treaty of Rome

 

ALMOST 50 per cent of EU BUDGET spent on Common Agriculture Policy for Fat cats - as the poor LOOK ON.

 

An interview with former Soviet Dissident Vladimir Bukovksy who

WARNS of EU DICTATORSHIP.

 

 
TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
 
By
 
NORRIS McWHIRTER

SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

The Act of Settlement 1701- why it should Concern you NOW?

 

THE BRITISH LEGACY - AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND -
WHY THEY MATTER?

 

101 REASONS FOR LEAVING THE EU

 

WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT.
 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

1418/5

So Why DON'T We LEAVE The EU?

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 
Daily Mail CHRISTMAS-2008 CAMPAIGN

ACTION ON ALZHEIMER'S

Make your cheque payable to 'Daily Mail' and send it , with this form, to Alzheimer's Appeal, PO BOX 5000, Dept. ALZ, ALTON HANTS, ENGLAND . GU34 9BX

YOU CAN GIVE ONLINE AT

www.dailymail.

co.uk/promotion

 

A

MERRY

 CHRISTMAS

in 2008

 AND A

 HAPPY NEW YEAR

 TO YOU ALL

 

TO LATE!

THEY

ARE

Closing the parliament door when the constitution has bolted? They do protest

TOO MUCH!

 

CONVENTIONS OF THE  HOUSE OF COMMONS

We will use the word of a great patriot historian Edward A. Freeman, D. C. L., LL.   D- Honorary Fellow of Trinity College, Oxford. (1876) From his: -

THE GROWTH

OF

THE

 

ENGLISH

CONSTITUTION

 

 

SO YOU ALL THOUGHT THAT COMMUNISM WAS DEAD WITH THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL-THINK AGAIN!

 

Snippets of COMMENT [Daily Mail COMMENT- Friday, December5, 2008]  WHAT A SHOWER!  THE ORIGINS OF THE EU   The origins of what is now the EUROPEAN UNION

A SINISTER EROSION OF OUR ANCIENT LIBERTIES

 

DID YOU KNOW?   

NO 6 -  

CAP

 trebles

COST of FOOD.

ABOLITION

WILL SAVE

£40

and £60 a week,

HUGE SAVING

for every

FAMILY IN THE  LAND

 

 

 

 

ECHR outlaws DNA DATABASE of INNOCENT PEOPLE

I HATE these UNELECTED FOREIGN JUDGES.

 BUT today I could kiss them for BACKING the FREEDOMS we FOUGHT TWO-WORLD WARS to PROTECT.  

by

TOM UTLEY

 

 

 

DID YOU KNOW?

 NO 5-  

BEHIND SCHEDULE  Buckets of taxpayers money are currently being poured into the EU'S Galileo Global Positioning System Programme.

This is behind schedule, massively over-budget and entirely unnecessary since we can use the American GPS System FREE OF CHARGE.

 

 

 

DID YOU KNOW?

 NO 4-

 National Interest  Always anxious to play its part eurofacts is keen to point out to the obvious truth that a genuinely EUROSCEPTIC GOVERNMENT

will find it easier to find CUTS than a

EUROPHILE ONE

for the simple reason that many EU programmes are HUGELY EXPENSIVE -UNNECESSARY

 

 

WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

THE SIGNS OF A DICTATORSHIP IN A ONCE FREE DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY

*

A monstrous abuse of power by the same bunch of gangsters who hounded Dr David Kelly to his DEATH

by

LITTLEJOHN

 

SO YOU

ALL

THOUGHT THAT COMMUNISM WAS DEAD WITH THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL-

THINK AGAIN!

 

THE

RIGHT

HONOURABLE

GENTLEMEN

- MANY ARE NEVER RIGHT OR HONOURABLE AND CERTAINLY NO GENTLEMEN.

 
LABOUR-CONSERVATIVE -LIBDEMS MPS

UNITE TO DEFEND

PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE WHICH THEIR OWN TRAITOROUS ACTIONS OVER 40 YEARS HAVE CULMINATED

IN A

TOTALITARIAN

STATE

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN
UK SELLS MORE GOODS OUTSIDE EU

CHRISTMAS  GREETINGS FROM THE PAST

2003-2007
THE SPEECH THE QUEEN SHOULD HAVE MADE

WE NEED A REVOLUTION

NOW!

 

FED UP!  No one to listen to your COMPLAINT

Daily Mail -Money Mail-editor Tony Hazell-Web:

 

www.thisismoney.co.uk

 

DID YOU KNOW? 

THE EURO 

No 1- WHY WE ARE BETTER OUT

 

TO LATE!Closing the parliament door when the constitution has bolted? They do protest

TOO MUCH!

 

THE SIGNS

 OF A

 DICTATORSHIP

IN

A ONCE FREE DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY

 
FRONT PAGE INFORMATION WITHDRAWN ON THE 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008

STILL AVAILABLE IN THE ABOVE

PICK & CHOOSE

 FORMAT 

TREASURY TEAM CAN'T ADD UP ON VAT REDUCTION.

*

Some retailers will not pass on Vat cut

 

AT LONG LAST!

A LABOUR PARTY  now back to it's roots - but A NATIONAL GOVERNMENT would have brought JUSTICE to bear on the PUBLIC PENSIONS SCANDAL.

 

THE ORIGINS

 OF THE EU

The origins of what is now the

EUROPEAN

UNION

COLLECTIVE
SOVIET ANALYST

A Review of continuing

Soviet global revolutionary strategy

 
The Lisbon Treaty is DEAD

IRISH voters rejected the LISBON TREATY on 12th June 2008.   In a debate in the House of Lords on 18th June, Lord Neill of Bladen, a former Warden and Vice-Chancellor of Oxford University, a highly respected lawyer, explained why

 

BBC Account of History obscured by the partial   Truth –

Part 1

 
NATIONAL DESTABILISATION PLAN OF KGB/GRU BASED ON SOVIET DEFECTOR INTELLIGENCE

*

[THE ENEMY WITHIN]

[ Note: 2 bulletins here]

The Minister of 'Justice' Mr Straw the 'Nonsense ' man, says Iraq war was legal

 

 A Silent Vigil in a village country church graveyard on Remembrance Day.

DID YOU KNOW?

THE EURO 

 No 2- WHY WE ARE BETTER OUT

 

GOVERNMENT should be the SERVANT of the PEOPLE and INDIVIDUALITY or it is a  DEMONICAL DICTATORSHIP.

 

DO YOU KNOW?

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

*

www.edwardharle.com

 
Don’t blame the

BNP.

It’s the main parties who have betrayed the voters

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

Blair

the

law

breaker

 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country.

 

CIVIL WAR

PARLIAMENT

AGAINST

 

THE KING

 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

RABID BEHAVIOUR OF MANY LABOUR MPS IN SUPPRESSING FREE SPEECH IN PARLIAMENT HAS NOW BEEN ACCOMPANIED WITH AN INVASION OF THE RIGHTS OF MEMBERS.

 

UK

SELLS

MORE GOODS

OUTSIDE

 EU

WE

NEED

A REVOLUTION

NOW!

 

LABOUR-CONSERVATIVE -LIBDEMS MPS UNITE TO DEFEND PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE WHICH THEIR OWN TRAITOROUS ACTIONS OVER 40 YEARS HAVE CULMINATED IN A TOTALITARIAN STATE

 

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

1418/6

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 

 

 

 

A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R. I .P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

 

THE TRUTH that BRUSSELS cannot BEAR:

PEOPLE CRAVE NATIONAL IDENTITY.

What happened in Catalonia on Sunday was shaming and shocking in a modern European state. Spanish police bludgeoned and assaulted defenceless civilians who were simply trying to exercise their democratic right.

First and foremost, this is a terrible crisis for the wrong-headed, bully-boy government in Madrid. After the unedifying spectacle of police attacking blameless voters, the chances must surely have increased of Catalonia – Spain’s most prosperous region with some 7.5million inhabitants – seceding.

But it is also an enormous crisis for the European Union, which in recent weeks has said almost nothing as the Spanish authorities arrested officials arranging an independence referendum on behalf of the devolved Catalan government.

 

 

 

One reason he did not do so in the case of Spain is that it is one of the most obedient pro-EU countries in Europe, which seldom defies the will of Brussels, or causes trouble for Juncker and his ilk.

But there is an even deeper reason for the Commission’s silence. The events in Catalonia challenge at a deep level its project for ever closer union, about which both Juncker and President Emmanuel Macron of France have ventilated in recent weeks.

For how can there be an amicable union between the EU’s nation states if some of those nations are themselves deeply divided and fractious, as is plainly the case with Catalonia and Spain?

Here is a region of largely Catalan-speaking people who regard themselves as culturally distinct. A sizeable proportion of them yearn to break free from Spain, even though Catalonia has been part of the country for hundreds of years.

Sunday’s vote illuminates a truth which Brussels cannot bear. There are many people in Europe for whom the atavistic call of identity counts far more than any exhortation about forging a European superstate

That, after all, was one of the main messages of Brexit – that the majority of voters in our own ancient nation resent the undemocratic control of Brussels, and have no wish to be sucked into a united Europe.

For Brussels, the example of Britain was bad enough, and it has set about trying to punish us for having had the effrontery to want to leave. In a sense, the demonstration of Catalan nationalism is even more alarming to the federalists because this show of independence is happening inside one of the EU’s nation states.

How is it possible, they wonder, for the pan-European project to proceed if some EU countries are in danger of fracturing? The terror in Brussels is that if Catalonia were allowed to break away, regions in other member states could follow suit. Instead of coalescing into an amorphous whole, some EU nations might fall apart.

Belgium, whose capital, Brussels, is the seat of EU expansionism, is divided. The Flemish-speaking region of Flanders, which constitutes about 60 per cent of the country’s population, is at daggers drawn with the French-speaking minority.

Many people in northern Italy long to be rid of the impoverished south, which is relatively unproductive and, in the view of northerners, consumes more than its fair share of government spending. The Right-wing Northern League has campaigned with some success for independence for the north, and imagines a separate country called Padania.

France faces an independence movement in the island of Corsica. Meanwhile the cohesion of Spain is threatened not just by free-spirited Catalans but also by militant Basques, part of whose territory lies in France.

Romania and Slovakia both have unhappy Hungarian minorities. Even in Poland’s region of Silesia, much of which used to be ruled by Germany until 1945, there are stirrings of an independence movement.

All over Europe apparently unified countries are harried by breakaway groups which have a strong sense of separate identity. If Catalonia were allowed to go it alone, who knows what might come next?


 

The problem for Brussels is that it is used to dealing with individual nation states but is powerless to intervene in unruly regions. That is why the Commission has remained so quiet in the case of Catalonia apart from expressing a few words of solidarity with Spain.

By the way, the British response has been regrettably supine. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson stressed his support for the Spanish government in a tweet. As the leading Brexiteer he should surely have been more critical of Madrid’s use of violence.

The Spanish government, it must be said, has behaved rashly and brutishly. Arguably some Catalan separatist political parties have been unwise in deliberately engineering a confrontation.

But given that the Catalan government had made numerous requests to hold a referendum on independence – after Spain’s constitutional court had controversially declared in 2010 that Catalonia was not a nation – what was it to do having been rebuffed time and time again? If it had possessed a modicum of good sense, the Spanish government would have allowed the referendum to go ahead. Had the vote been in favour of independence, it could have then questioned its legal status.

But to arrest Catalan officials, to close a large number of polling stations, and then to clobber innocent voters were acts of unbelievable stupidity as well as nastiness.

It passes understanding how the prime minister of Spain, Mariano Rajoy, can say that democracy has prevailed. The opposite is true.

Imagine if two or three years hence the Scottish National Party’s Nicola Sturgeon were to hold a referendum without the approval of Westminster – by no means an unthinkable eventuality.

In fact, her case would be much weaker than that of the Catalan government since there has already been one legal referendum in Scotland in 2014, which was said by the SNP leader Alex Salmond at the time to be the last for a generation.

Even so, it is inconceivable that a new unofficial referendum in Scotland would be met by the authorities in Westminster with police wielding batons and firing rubber bullets. Such a wild over-reaction would inevitably give a boost to Scottish nationalism – as, I have no doubt, the cause of Catalan nationalism will have benefited from Sunday’s onslaught.

The truth is that the Spanish state has a very restricted conception of democracy. We should know that already from its desire to shoehorn Gibraltar into Spain despite 99 per cent of its citizens having voted in a 2002 referendum to remain British.

God alone knows what will happen now in Catalonia. Unless the Spanish government agrees to an official referendum – an unlikely prospect – there will probably be deadlock. I am afraid there is also the possibility of more violence on both sides.

Justifying and supporting the Madrid government is the European Commission in all its absurdity, dreaming dreams of a union which the people of Europe do not want. It will do its utmost to ensure that Catalonia doesn’t interfere with its grandiose scheme.

Will Remainers look at Catalonia and reflect that we have a quieter and more civilised way of dealing with our differences in this country? I don’t know. What I do know is that every day I am ever more relieved that we are leaving this misguided club.


Full article

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4942684/STEPHEN-GLOVER-truth-national-identity.html#ixzz4uYWX4q7V

Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

 

92

View
comments

 

H.F.1332 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

 

NEW AGE

OF

 INTOLERANCE

 

A.N. WILSON on the new dark age of intolerance: You must believe in gay marriage, you can't question abortion and as for transgender rights...

The great French writer Voltaire famously said: 'I disapprove of what you say and would defend to the death your right to say it'. In this way, he encapsulated what it meant to be an enlightened human being — someone prepared to consider all points of view.

But in recent years the principle of freedom of speech, sacred since Voltaire's 18th century, has been lost, and this is surely one of the most sinister features of our times. It is as if we are entering a new Dark Age of Intolerance.

The irony is that this intolerance has come about as a result of what were initially good intentions. One of the things which makes me happy as I grow older is the thought that during my lifetime we have all tried to become a kinder society.

When I was a boy and a young man, for example, racist jokes were the norm on radio and TV. Now they would be unthinkable. Mockery of homosexuals, and the equation of being gay with being limp-wristed and camp, were absolute norms of comedy when I was growing up. Now no longer.

Such jokes have gone the way of boarding-houses which used to put 'NO BLACKS. NO DOGS. NO IRISH in the window'. Obviously, all civilised people feel pleased by this.

But somehow those initial good intentions — to be kinder to and more tolerant of others — have morphed into a political correctness that has had the very opposite effect.

Two notorious recent examples of this concerned the treatment of a Christian baker in Northern Ireland, and some Christian bed and breakfast owners in Berkshire. The baker had not wanted to make a wedding cake for a gay couple who were getting married. The B&B owners had refused to let a gay couple share the same room in their establishment. In each case they were successfully sued for unlawful discrimination.

Now, a gay activist would no doubt say this was a good thing, arguing that the baker and bed and breakfast owners' behaviour was comparable to the racism of the past. Yet this is surely getting things wholly out of proportion.

The baker was not persecuting homosexuals, as Hitler did. He was not saying they should be put in prison, as all Home Secretaries in Britain did until the Sixties. He was merely saying that, as a Christian, he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman, and that two chaps tying the knot were doing something rather different, which is contrary to traditional Christian teaching.

Whatever you think about this matter, the Northern Irish baker and the B&B couple were merely holding on to Christian beliefs.

I don't happen to share their views myself, and think that if two people are rash enough to promise to live together for the rest of their lives, good luck to them, whether they are gay, straight, trans or anything else. But surely you can understand both sides of this dilemma, can't you?

Well, the answer, more and more in our intolerant society, is 'No'. My concern here is not about the rights and wrongs of gay marriage, transgender rights, our colonial history, or any of the other emotive issues that are subject to endless debate in the modern age.

It is about freedom of thought and speech; freedom to disagree in a liberal society; freedom to have thoughts which are different from the current orthodoxy.

What began as our very decent desire not to be nasty to those of a different ethnicity, or sexual proclivity, from ourselves, has turned into a world as intolerant as monkish Christianity in the days of the Dark Ages, when any freedom of thought is questioned.

Tim Farron, leader of the Lib Dems during the General Election, was asked repeatedly about his views on gay marriage. As a fairly old-fashioned Christian, he did not believe it was possible — marriage should be between a man and a woman.

As the leader of a modern political party, he knew that it would be political death to admit this. He was finally forced to resign.

This was a signal to the world that if you want to succeed in modern politics, it is simply not allowed to hold views which, until a very short time ago, were the consensus among the great majority of people in the Western world.

I use the words 'not allowed' advisedly. What is sinister about living in the new Dark Ages, however, is that it is by no means clear who is doing the allowing and not allowing. In Mao's China, it was obvious: thought crimes were ideas which contradicted the supreme leader.

In Britain today, however, it seems an army of self-appointed censors — from internet trolls to angry students, lobby groups, town hall officials, craven politicians and lawyers and Establishment figures, as well as a host of other sanctimonious and often bilious busy-bodies — have taken it upon themselves to police what we can and cannot think or say.

Not believing in abortion, like not believing in gay marriage, is now, unquestionably, a thought crime. It was hardly surprising that the Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg recently said he did not believe in abortion, because he is a man of conviction as well as a Roman Catholic, and this is the teaching of his Church. Yet his view was treated with incredulity and disdain by everyone from trolls and women's groups to the higher echelons of the political Establishment.

As in the case of abortion, debate is no longer allowed on transgender issues. There was a BBC2 Horizon Programme last Tuesday night called Being Transgender. The close-up shots of transgender surgery in a Californian hospital will not easily leave the mind.

We met a number of nice people who had decided for one reason or another that they were not the gender which they had once supposed. They were all undergoing some form of transformative medical treatment, either taking hormones or having surgery.

What made the programme strange as a piece of journalism was the fact that it did not contain one dissenting voice. Not one psychiatrist or doctor who said they doubted the wisdom of some of these procedures, especially in the very young.

Still less was there anyone like the redoubtable feminist and academic Dr Germaine Greer who once expressed her view that a man did not become a woman just because he had undergone transgender surgery — and was, as a result, decried from the rooftops with everything from petitions launched to stop her from speaking at university campuses to death threats.

Dr Greer had also been bold enough to say 'a great many women' shared her view, which is obviously true — a great many women do not think that transgender people have really changed sex. What has changed is that it is no longer permitted to say so.

A friend of mine who likes bathing in the women's pond on Hampstead Heath in London says that at least one person now uses the female changing rooms who is obviously in a stage of transition from man to woman, and is simply a hairy man wearing lipstick.

However uncomfortable this makes the women feel, they know that they cannot say anything.

There was an ugly incident lately at Hyde Park's Speakers' Corner, which used to be the place where anyone could go and stand on a soap-box and hold any opinion they liked.

Speakers' Corner was a symbol of British Freedom of Speech. As a schoolboy, I had a Jewish friend whose grandfather used to take us there to listen to people proclaiming that the earth was flat, preachers praising Hitler, Stalin, and others saying whatever they liked. It was the freedom to do so, said the old man who had escaped Hitler's Germany, which made the very air of Britain so refreshing to him.

What would he have thought had he witnessed the scene earlier this month at Speakers' Corner when a 60-year-old woman called Maria was smacked in the face, allegedly by a transgender fanatic, while listening to a talk on planned reforms to the Gender Recognition Act. Reforms which would allow men to 'self-identify' as female, and enter women's changing rooms or refuges unchallenged.

For Maria, as for the intimidated women of Hampstead swimming pool, and for Germaine Greer, it is by no means clear that transgender people have changed their sex.

Transgender activists have labelled women like Maria TERFS — Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists. When news of the assault on her reached the internet — ie instantaneously — the trolls began baying, like the bloodthirsty mob during the guillotine-executions of the French Revolution. 'Burn in a fire, TERF'. 'I want to f*** some TERFS up, they are no better than fascists'.

The use of the word 'fascist' is commonplace in our new Dark Age for anyone with whom you happen to disagree. You hear it all the time in the Brexit arguments which rage all around us and which I dread. As it happens, I voted Remain. But I do not regard Brexiteers as 'fascists', and many of their arguments — wanting to reclaim the power to make our own laws and control our own borders — are evidently sensible.

Yet I have lost count of the number of times I have heard Remainers say that Brexiteers are fascists. As a matter of historical fact, many of the keenest supporters of a united European superstate were actual fascists.

The only British politician who campaigned on the ticket of Europe A Nation during the Fifties was Sir Oswald Mosley who was leader of the British Union of Fascists. But then, today's PC censors don't let facts get in their way of bigotry.

Branding anyone you disagree with a fascist; hitting people in the face; tweeting and blogging abuse behind the cowardly anonymity of the internet — these are the ugly weapons used to stifle any sort of debate. And it is often in the very places where ideas should be exchanged and examined that the bigotry is at its worst: our universities.

This week on the Radio 4's Today programme, we heard James Caspian, a quietly-spoken, kindly psychotherapist, describing what has become a cause celebre at Bath Spa University.

He has been working for some years with people who for one reason or another have begun the process of gender-transition, and then come to regret it.

Caspian is evidently not a judgmental man. He wanted to write a thesis on this subject from a sympathetic and dispassionate point of view.

What makes people feel so uncomfortable with their own apparent gender that they wish to undergo painful and invasive surgery to change it? What makes people then come to reassess their first idea? These are surely legitimate questions about a subject many of us can't quite comprehend.

I have two friends who started out as men, and decided in mid-life that they were really women, or wanted to become women, which is what they have done. I do not really understand what has happened to them, even though they have tried to explain it to me.

Surely a man like James Caspian, who has worked with transgender men and women, should be encouraged by a university to explain this area of medicine or psychology?

But no. The university, having initially approved of his idea for a thesis, then turned down his application. 'The fundamental reason given was that it might cause criticism of the research on social media, and criticism of the research would be criticism of the university,' he told Radio 4 listeners. 'They also added it's better not to offend people.'

This is all of a piece with students at Oxford wanting to pull down the statue of 19th century imperialist Cecil Rhodes from his old college, Oriel, on the grounds that he was racist.

Rather than having a reasoned debate weighing the evils of racist colonialism against Rhodes's benevolence, the student at the forefront of the movement — who had actually accepted a £40,000 Rhodes scholarship funded by the fortune the colonialist gave to Oxford — wanted to pull down the statue.

This is the same attitude of mind as that which led monks in the Dark Ages to destroy the statues of pagan gods and goddesses, or the Taliban to do the same to age-old Buddhist artefacts.

Reason, debate, seeing more than one side to an argument, surely these are the foundations of all that has fashioned the great values of the West since the Enlightenment started in the 18th century with an explosion of new ideas in science, philosophy, literature, and modern rational thought that ushered in the Age of Reason.

Realising that human actions and ideas are often mixtures of good and bad — isn't this what it means to have a grown-up mind? Surely we should be allowed to discuss matters without being accused of thought crime?

In universities, as at Speakers' Corner and in the public at large, there used to be the robust sense that sticks and stones may break our bones but words can never hurt us. Now, the 'hurt-feelings' card is regularly played to stifle any debate.

Little by little, we are allowing the Dark Ages of intolerance to come again. We should not be letting this happen.

We should be able to say: 'We disapprove of your views — on Europe, on Transgender Issues, on Islam, on absolutely anything, but we defend to the death your right to express them'.


 

Full article

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4935418/A-N-WILSON-new-dark-age-intolerance.html#ixzz4uAFieZ6T
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[COMMENTS-HIGHLIGHTING - ARE OURS!]

 

SEPTEMBER 30-2017

H.F.1329

 

HOME

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM? THAT IS YOUR CHOICE

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-June 27,2008]

DEMOCRACY and freedom. It is a fine sounding phrase-rarely off the lips of President Bush as he blunders around the Middle East.

Why do we readily accept that democracy and freedom are natural partners? There is scant historical evidence for it. Often it is a case of

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM: even DEMOCRACY versus FREEDOM.

Consider two examples.  the United States is the only country to have banned alcohol by public demand. Contrast this with Hong Kong. Until shortly before being handed back by

BRITAIN to BEIJING

 it had

NO DEMOCRACY

at all: It was ruled by a colonial governor. Yet enjoyed enviable freedom with one of the least intrusive governments -and flourished wonderfully.

Our own experience also has much to tell us.

BEING A DEMOCRACY HAS NOT PROMOTED PERSONAL LIBERTY.

QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

More than

3000

 NEW OFFENCES

have been created since 1997, and officialdom revels in nearly

300 POWERS OF ENTRY.

Much of this is due to the

EUROPEAN UNION

whose

DIRECTIVES

are rarely scrutinised, let alone debated , by our supposedly democratic representatives.

WHAT we may SAY, WRITE or DO, or whom WE EMPLOY has been increasingly limited. The Government has passed legislation which can make assisting your son's football team

AN OFFENCE.

Another side of our

'democracy'

demonstrates painfully how the public will is constantly flouted. Take the brazen example of voters being

PROMISED REFERENDUM

on

CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

resulting from the

LISBON TREATY

The unscrupulous machinery of government has been deployed to

FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC WILL.

I am not making a party point.

FOR OVER 40 YEARS, GOVERNMENTS OF BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN RESISTING AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC DEMAND FOR CURBS ON

IMMIGRATION.

especially from the

NEW COMMONWEALTH.

 While successive governments have made a show of meeting public demand, they have, quite consciously

REFUSED TO ADDRESS IT

throwing occasional tit-bits to the voters in the hope

THAT THIS WILL KEEP THEM QUIET.

Consider, also, the strong public demand for

CRIMINALS TO BE PROPERLY PUNISHED.

Successive governments, including Mrs Thatcher's have come under the sway of the

'PRISON REFORM'

people -with the result that

CRIMINALS RECEIVE VERY MODEST SENTENCES.

What is more, if they serve a sentence at all, it is in the softest conditions.

IF LYING ON YOUR BED AND WATCHING TV FOR A FEW MONTHS IS THE WORST THAT THE LAW WILL INFLICT

(and that's if you are even caught)

then

CRIME IS WORTH THE RISK

AND

PUBLIC OUTRAGE IS IGNORED.

The explanation is quite logical. Politicians are typically driven by

TWO THINGS.

THE FIRST is the PURSUIT OF POWER

the most exciting thing in the world, or even some say, the first.  If this urge is not there when they start their political careers

THEN IT SOON TAKES OVER.

THEIR SECOND MOTIVATION -to give our politicians their due - is the DESIRE FOR REFORM, IMPROVE the condition of the PEOPLE.

But the catch here is that most politicians

 THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE FAR BETTER THAN THEMSELVES.

THEY FORM AN ELITE

WHICH LISTENS TO

OTHER ELITES

Or perhaps, since the word elite sounds flattering, we should say

THEY FORM A CASTE.

 

Politicians do not wake each morning wondering whether they are meeting the public will.  They turn to the media to learn what is said about them in newspapers and on the radio by other members of the

NATIONAL ELITE

- the selectorate, the clattering classes, the scribblers, the intellectually fashionable, call them what you will.

 

For elites to be out of touch is not unusual, even inevitable. The desire to be 'in' with the 'right' people is common with politicians; their weakness is for approval (and fame).

Of course, there is one moment when public opinion cannot be ignored -and that is at an

ELECTION

As Rousseau observed, voters are truly free

ONLY

 ON

ELECTION DAY.

But , by then, all the issues are jumbled up, and the voter finds himself choosing between

TWO COMPLEX and CONFUSING MENUS.

And while it is clearly advantageous for a party to offer the public

WHAT IT WANTS, the fact that both main parties say MUCH THE SAME THING..

-and make similar insincere

PROMISES

makes a mockery of any claim to be driven by

PUBLIC WILL.

 

BUT  the ALTERNATIVE to our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM politicians say in horror, would be GOVERNMENT by REFERENDUMS. With 'horror' because it would take power from THEM and give it to THE PEOPLE.

BUT WHY NOT?

The Swiss have made a suburb success of it. Referendums are required on national and local issues if enough voters petition for them and they often do. As a result, the Federal Government, like  the local CANTON administrations, proceeds with CAUTION in case its plans are overturned by a PUBLIC VOTE. . .

To acknowledge that our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, which has developed over the centuries, NO LONGER WORKS -MAY BE PAINFUL. But if you put that to a REFERENDUM,

MOST VOTERS WOULD HEARTILY AGREE.

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

 *

HOME

[brought forward from June-2008

AUGUST-2008

*

[ 'IN JANUARY 2018 we can look back over 10 years and see that the situation with regard to many matters mentioned above has got progressively WORSE! Whether it is IMMIGRATION-POLICING-LAWS...The only GOOD NEWS is that we are only just over a year away from leaving the monstrous soon to be containment camp know as the EU SUPER-STATE a plan of ADOLF-HITLER in 1940 for GERMANY to dominate Europe in the PEACE .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[brought forward from June-2008

H.F.1332

 
 
 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 
 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018          JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018          JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018          JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012