- (1994 -Official Website-JANUARY- NEW -HOME-- PAGE 2-2018 

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018        DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018         DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018      DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

 

WHO WILL SPEAK FOR  ENGLAND    DAILY MAIL COMMENT   PART 1   TODAY the Mail asks a question of profound significance to our destiny as a sovereign nation and the fate of our children and grandchildren. Who will speak for England? It's a question inspired  by one of the most dramatic moments in the history of Parliamentary democracy. The date was September 2, 1939, the day after Hitler invaded Poland. Tory PM Neville Chamberlain had just made an ambivalent statement to the House. On his backbenches, anti-appeasement stalwart Leo Amery was incensed. As Labour's deputy leader Arthur Greenwood rose to reply for the Opposition, the Tory MP bellowed across the floor: SPEAK FOR ENGLAND And Greenwood did just that, voicing anger over the premier's reluctance to honour Britain's treaty obligations to Poland.  Bowing to the mood of the House, Chamberlain DECLARED WAR ON HITLER THE NEXT DAY. Nobody is suggesting there are any parallels whatever between the NAZIS AND THE EU Indeed, the Mail would argue that one of the Union's great achievements, along with NATO, has been to foster peace in Europe. But as in 1939, we are at a crossroads in our island history. For oin perhaps as little as 20 weeks 'time, voters will be asked to decide nothing less than what sort of country we want to live in and bequeath to those who come after us. Are we to be a self-governing nation to control our borders, strike trade agreements with whomever we choose and DISMISS OUR RULERS AND LAWMAKERS IF THEY DISPLEASE US? Or will our LIBERTY-SECURITY and PROSPERITY be better assured by submitting to a STATIST-UNELECTED-BUREAUCRACY IN BRUSSELS accepting the will of UNACCOUNTABLE JUDGES and linking OUR DESTINY with that of a sclerotic Europe that tries to achieve the impossible by uniting countries as diverse as  GERMANY and GREECE. For make no mistake. After the failure of Mr Cameron's renegotiations-and this week's draft deal shows there's no other word for it than FAILURE, since it changes NOTHING of any substance in our relationship with the EU -this is the stark choice facing us in the coming REFERENDUM For months, we have been bombarded with propaganda from one side: the side that speaks for BRUSSELS. In a brilliantly organised campaign, BIG BUSINESS UNIVERSITIES 'ELDER STATESMEN' and the CIVIL SERVICE under the direction of its head, Sir Cover-up' Jeremy Heywood-have been corralled into making the case that it would be a catastrophe if BRITAIN left the EU. Needless to say, their apocalyptic interventions have been zealously reported by the supposedly neutral BBC, that former champion of the disastrous EURO, which struggles for the 'OUT' camp Meanwhile, the Conservative Party has thrown off all pretence of impartiality, proselytising for the EU in defiance of most of its rank-and-file members, who have grave doubts about Brussels. More shamefully still, Eurosceptic ministers have been muzzled-banned from speaking on the most momentous issue of our time, even now that we know the [pathetic] terms Mr [Neville] Cameron is willing to accept' As we report today, an edict has even gone out requiring all Cabinet ministers to filter their statements and quotes on Europe through Downing Street. So we ask again: who will speak for England( and of course by 'England' like Amery in 1939, we mean the whole of the United Kingdom)? Full Article  DAILY MAIL COMMENT FOLLOW ON PART 2   DAILY MAIL COMMENT: At last, we have voices to speak for  ENGLAND Earlier this month, the Mail asked on our front page:   WHO WILL SPEAK FOR  ENGLAND   FEBRUARY 22-2016   Daily Mail         THE DOMINIC LAWSON   COLUMN      Cameron and the lie that's festered .for 45 years.   HOW THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND WERE BETRAYED IN 1972 AND 1975-AND THE  CON PARTY ARE STILL LYING IN 2016   As Mr  Lawson has stated so aptly: YOUR VOTE TO LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC EU is to become once more a FREE SELF-GOVERNING COUNTRY and to ask the   OTHERSIDE   WHY ARE YOU AGAINST    'SELF GOVERNING  DEMOCRACY'   YES, WHY ARE THEY? * [The LEAVE the EU Camp have not forgotten their world renowned inheritance of PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY of over 700 years in the making and known in the British Commonwealth and across the pond and wherever Habeus Corpus and Trial by Jury Justice is upheld as the   'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen.']     [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]   .FEBRUARY 22-2016 -     *   *   *   [Does not the behaviour by HERR Cameron and his hiring's  supposed democrats strike one as reminiscent of the early years of Adolf Hitler which led up to the formation of the Nazi SS. Once all views are subject to censorship under the present circumstances then we are no longer a true DEMOCRACY. As Plato states: 'Democracy passes into DESPOTISM' and the details mentioned above confirm such a declaration and all this has been brought about because since  the 1688 Revolution there has been the stark failure to heed Oliver Cromwell's clarion call for the  constitutional protection of the  SACRED FUNDAMENTALS OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.] PART 2-TO FOLLOW SHORTLY * ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND 293   In 1962,  Field Marshall Montgomery  found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality   HITLER'S plan for Europe  under   GERMAN CONTROL.     [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]   FEBRUARY 4- 2016 H. F .700

 *

Brought forward from 2009 Revealed: The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich ...in the EU By Adam Lebor Updated: 22:30, 9 May 2009 1 View comments The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944. The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for Germany's post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis' return to power and work for a 'strong German empire'. In other words: the Fourth Reich.   Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben The three-page, closely typed report, marked 'Secret', copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany's economy by sending money through Switzerland. They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again. The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire - but not just German. The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol. The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of Europe. The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War. But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact. Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945. The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration. Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass? The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 - and it paints an extraordinary picture. The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.   Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a factory run by German firm I. G. Farben There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. 'It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.' Such defeatist talk was treasonous - enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo's cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp. But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to 'make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion'. The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war. They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company. But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite. Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich. In stage one, the industrialists were to 'prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis', using the term for the French resistance. Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a 'secure post-war foundation in foreign countries', while 'existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat'. In stage three, German businesses would set up a 'sleeper' network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power. 'The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,' Bosse announced. 'Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.'   Enlarge   Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing 'plans of German industrialists to engage in underground activity' The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission. The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years. Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials. Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence. The Red House Report's author notes: 'Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence. 'Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party's plans for its post-war operations.' The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter. More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling. During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it. A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy. He says: 'By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.' Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead. As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children. A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad's gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility. By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf's ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS's massive pan-European economic empire after Germany's defeat. Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the transition to a post-war economy after Germany's defeat. This was dangerous, especially as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups. But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service, protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS. Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS's economic empire almost worthless. The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to introduce a currency that would have any value. That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency, Germany was once again an attractive trading partner. The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires across Europe. War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 - despite six years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments - the capital stock of assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the armaments boom. Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered European continent. The answer was through supranationalism - the voluntary surrender of national sovereignty to an international body. Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today. But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists convicted of war crimes. The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years. Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death. The Krupp company soon became one of Europe's leading industrial combines. The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a fortune of more than $1billion, the equivalent of £400million at the time. 'For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,' says historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers. 'The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.' Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the V1 rocket. Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with the SS officers overseeing the camps. Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany's most powerful banker, had prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of Deutsche Bank, Germany's biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded, Deutsche Bank enthusiastically 'Aryanised' Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were owned by Jews. By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche Bank's wealth had quadrupled. Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, as Deutsche Bank's representative. I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany's most powerful companies, formed out of a union of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties. It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other prisoners died producing artificial rubber. When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis' chilling term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent for which was owned by I.G. Farben. But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben's bosses hedged their bets. During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard's research. After the war, 24 I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III - but only twelve of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder. Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany's post-war reconstruction. It was largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a 'strong German empire' was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today's European Union. Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid - reconstruction funds - to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany's economic recovery. Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union. Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are strikingly familiar today - on monetary integration and common transport, energy and welfare systems. When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs was his most important financial adviser. Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer. That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and European Commission. Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard Germany's first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as Chancellor for three years. But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe - was built on mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by German companies in the Nazi era was 2,700,000. Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry. A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer 5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any further legal action. To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of £1.8billion. Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory. But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief, once said: 'In 50 years' time nobody will think of nation states.' For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today's drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich - an economic rather than military imperium. • The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor's thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is published by Reportage Press. Full ARTICLE Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1179902/Revealed-The-secret-report-shows-Nazis-planned-Fourth-Reich--EU.html#ixzz4oiNwdrtt Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook   H.F.1270 -BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

*

A WORLD

OF

CHANGE

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis by Benjamin Fulford   Author: Benjamin Fulford   2018-12-10 Donate My Account Subscription Details Update Credit Card Edit Profile Register Log In   Secret war centers on SWIFT after George Bush Sr. is executed By Benjamin Fulford Weekly Reports  309 Comments   Since the death of Nazi Fourth Reich Fuhrer George Bush Sr., the battle for control of the world’s financial system, and thus of the process of deciding humanity’s future, is now centering on control of the SWIFT international interbank electronic transfer system. A final battle is taking place between the 13 bloodlines which have traditionally controlled the planet, and the meritocratic Gnostic Illuminati who control the U.S. military-industrial complex, multiple sources agree.  The battle is heading for a climax of sorts now that George Bush Senior has been “executed,” as confirmed by both Pentagon and CIA sources. Here is what a CIA source had to say: “I have been told by two sources that G.H.W. Scherff (Bush) was actually indicted on September 10, 2018 for crimes against humanity, child trafficking, sedition, and treason.  He allegedly plea-bargained a deal with the military tribunal hearing his case, to be executed/suicided to keep his legacy intact for his family and the sheeple.  Trump signed the death order.  So was it a clone that was executed, since we also have intel that he died in June (another clone).  I think Bush/Scherff actually died in January 1992, choking on sushi and then finished off by Barbara Bush with a poisoned cloth (as seen in the video posted last week).  Military tribunals are set to begin on January 2, 2019.” Pentagon sources, for their part, said U.S. President Donald “Trump was careful not give Bush 41 a state funeral, as this executed criminal was denied a horse and caisson like Reagan got.” “To the victor belong the spoils, for Trump picked former Bush Attorney General Bill Parr as his next AG and he chose ‘the day that will live in infamy,’ December 7th [the Pearl Harbor anniversary] to do it,” the Pentagon source added. The CIA source also wondered if Barr made “a deal to avoid military tribunals and then be ‘McCained’? (the term being used lately for execution/suicide).  Maybe he flipped like Senator Lindsey Graham?” The death of Bush, the former U.S. Ambassador to China whose brother handed over U.S. military secrets to that country (as did Hillary and Bill Clinton), means that the U.S. and China are also heading to a showdown as bloodline families seek Chinese protection, according to secret society sources. Pentagon sources say the arrest of Chinese conglomerate Huawei’s Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou “is aimed to …   The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net Please Log In or Register to create an account.     2018-12-13 Previous JCS Chairman By Benjamin Fulford Letters to the Editor  0 Comments Ben:  Enjoy your weekly newsletters and I put more credence in you than any other source.  I’m curious about your comment in last newsletter, “as the previous JCS Chairman was Army.”  I believe you’ll find that Gen. Joseph Dunford was a United States Marine.  Means a lot to us former active duty Marines!  Have a great day. I was referring to his predecessor Mike Dempsey, since Dunford is still JCS Chairman for now. –BF     2018-12-10 Queensland fire twisters: a naturally occurring phenomenon By Benjamin Fulford Letters to the Editor  2 Comments Greetings from Australia, Ben: Thank you so much for the narrative you provide us with on a weekly basis and for your direct involvement in the demise of “malevolents” by attempting to bring equality to those presently incarnated on this beautiful planet. The pictures below are of a naturally occurring phenomenon that usually occurs at the end of the dry season, when the atmosphere is all but devoid of humidity. I   I know them as “willie-willies” and have also heard them called “dust-devils.”  They are most commonly seen on the flatter country in their dust form and will also form very readily when fire is present. It is my belief that these are not the result of leo, DEW platforms, unlike what has been perpetrated on the populations of the West Coast of the not-so-United-States-of-America. I have no problem, though, with the notion that a majority of the fires are being “started” and enhanced by the obvious weather manipulations that have been and still are perpetrated upon this continent (Australia) and our neighbour New Zealand for many years now. Please keep up the excellent work you are doing, and may the tyranny that has held sway on this planet for so long be replaced by a more universally beneficial alternative way of being in the very near future. —IH Thanks for the information;  I will let my readers know. —BF   2018-12-03 In historic move, P2 Freemasons—the Black Sun worshipers—sue for peace By Benjamin Fulford Weekly Reports  409 Comments In what future historians will look back on as a huge watershed event, the P2 Freemasons—worshipers of the Black Sun and creators of both fascism and communism—are suing for peace, White Dragon Society sources say.  This, coming with the removal of the Rothschild family from control of central banks, means the world is about to enter uncharted historical waters. The P2 Freemasons are proposing that the world “be led by a triumvirate of the sons of the Black Sun, the sons of big Horus, and sons of the Dragon,” according to the proposal conveyed by Vincenzo Mazzara, a cavalier of the Teutonic Knights and the most senior P2 member to contact the WDS. The “sons of the Black Sun” refers to the P2 Freemasons, who give orders to the Pope and the world’s 1.5 billion or so Catholics.  The “sons of big Horus” refers to the eye at the top of the pyramid on the U.S. one-dollar bill, presumably referring to non-P2 Freemasons such as the Scottish Rite and Grand Orient who control much of the English- and French-speaking world.  The “sons of the Dragon” refers to Asian secret societies who control most of East Asia. At this point, most readers are probably, and rightly so, appalled at the idea of three secret societies colluding in order to continue to rule in secret.  The WDS, of course, wants everything to be open and with full public participation.  Nonetheless, the P2 are powerful;  they told us in advance they were going to fire Pope “Maledict” (Benedict XVI) and they did so.  The P2 also bragged to the WDS that they were the ones responsible for staging the March 11, 2011 Fukushima tsunami and nuclear mass-murder terror incident.  Thus, the fact that they are now suing for peace means they know the dragnet is finally closing in on them. This move is also intimately related to the announcement that Nazi Fourth Reich Fuhrer George H.W. Scherff (Bush) is dead.  As Pentagon sources put it, “While the G20 was prepping the world for a global currency reset, 41st President Bush Sr. expired on 11/30 because 11+30=41.”  In fact, Bush Sr. died in June, but the announcement was delayed until all the preparations were made to arrest senior Nazionist (Khazarian mafia) underlings like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, the sources say. This is why U.S. President Donald Trump retweeted this famous image on November 27th with the label, “Now that Russia collusion is a proven lie, when do the trials for treason begin?” The answer to that question, Pentagon sources say is that …   The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net Please Log In or Register to create an account.     2018-11-28 Emergency alert: North Koreans warn of Zionist plan to start WWIII in Korea and Crimea By Benjamin Fulford Notices  18 Comments November 27, 2018:  Manchu royal family members called today to warn of a Zionist plot to start World War III by provoking incidents in Korea and Crimea.  “The people behind [French President Emmanuel] Macron are doing this,” the sources say. So it appears that the Zionists, fearful of imminent mass arrests for crimes against humanity, are attempting a Hail Mary maneuver to start their long-planned artificial end-times war between Gog and Magog, or Russia and China versus the G7. Asian secret society sources also hinted last week that some sort of military confrontation was “needed in order to stimulate necessary changes.”  It appears the Chinese have been offered control of all of Asia, including Japan, if they go along with this plot. The Manchus say some sort of Chinese military incursion into North Korea is imminent and will take place simultaneously with a Russian invasion of the Ukraine in order to provoke World War III. The events in the Ukraine have already started with a military provocation against Russia ordered by the highest levels of the Ukrainian government, as can be seen from multiple news reports.  The Ukrainian government has also declared martial law and started a general mobilization. This attempt can be prevented by keeping calm and making pinpoint arrests of the government officials and high-level financiers who are seen visibly stoking the flames of war.  Officials who need to be removed as soon as possible include Macron, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, and any senior Chinese officials who are seen pushing for an invasion of North Korea. The Russians also need to be allowed to enter the Ukraine and clean up the Nazionist filth there without any Western military intervention.     H.F.1765

*  *  *

 

[A CAUSE WORTH FIGHTING FOR THE RETURN OF THE FREE NATION STATE OF  ENGLAND -instead of remaining within a threatening-toxic totalitarian so-called European Union- a monstrous- cunning - controlling - captive - calamitous soon to be SUPER-STATE. * BUT TO REGAIN OUR RIGHTFULL INHERITANCE.] "WE must never cease to proclaim in fearless tones the great principles of freedom and the rights of man which are the joint inheritance of the English-speaking world and which through Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, the Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, and the English Common Law find their most famous expression in the American Declaration of independence..."   Part of an almost 1000 word speech by Winston Churchill at Fulton Missouri,USA in March,1946, [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!} DECEMBER  5,2018 H.F.1760

*

LITTLEJOHN     I'm a Brexiteer Get me OUT of here!     *....MY BEST guess on Brexit has always been that a dirty deal was done before the Chequers ambush in the summer Mother Theresa would present her shabby withdrawal agreement, certain in the knowledge that it would never get the support of her own party, let alone the House of Commons. But in the process, she would shed the most truculent Brexiteers from her Government and eventually, pull a rabbit from the hat at the last minute which would allow her to plot a marshmallow soft Brexit-in-name-only through Parliament. I assumed the EU's grand panjandrums were fully on board with this cynical stitch-up, whatever noises they made for public consumption . If there's one thingJean- Paul-Georges-et Ringo would love more than the UK crawling back into the fold, tail between legs. It's, Mrs May's craven plan to keep us in their orbit as a serf state, under the thumb but shorn mof all influence. Up until yesterday, anyway, everything was going according to plan. That was before she bottled putting her 'deal' to the vote, when the overwhelming scale of her looming defeat became apparent. No prime Minister could have survived in office given the hammering she would have taken in the division lobbies. So, instead of scuttling off to Brussels begging for more pre-arranged concessions' after a slim mdefeat in Parliament, she has been forced to step back from the abyss. Now what? Theresa says she intends to return to the EU to seek further 'reassurance' on the Irish backstop. Be honest, have you any idea what this 'backstop' nonsense is all about?  It's an elaborate smoke-screen dreamed up to stop a proper Brexit. LONG story short, without going into teeth-grindingly boring detail, it is designed to divide Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK and ensure that we can never, ever,leave the EU's cuastoms union, without the permission of our SO-CALLED 'PARTNERS. That pipsqueak ingrate Irish premier Lenny Verruca didn't do Mrs May any favours yesterday, either, dancing a jig to the Brussels tune and issuing empty threats against a benevolent, and much larger, neighbour which kept his country afloat during difficult economic times. Of all the horror stories put about by PROJECT FEAR the warnings about Brexit imperilling the Irish peace process are by far and away the MOST DESPICABLE. It is an insult not just to Britain but to the Irish people themselves, on whichever side of the political divide, who have invested so much in resolving their differences. For opportunist politicians to exploit GOODWILL with incendiary remarks about reigniting violence is beneath contempt. So, too, the garbage about children going hungry because school meals won't be available after Brexit, or people dying from lack of imported medicines. Enough, already. Look, I say again, even hardline 'no deal' Brexiteers like me accept that there will have to be some compromises if we are to GET OUT OF THE EU in one piece. But the antics of the political class have been shameful, an insult to the intelligence of every single one of us who pay their wages. As I said last week, WHO CAN YOU TRUST ? With a few honourable exceptions, their collective behaviour as been SELF-SERVING and DISGRACEFUL. I admired Boris for having the courage to come out in favour of LEAVE even if he did take for ever to weigh his options. He should have got the top job after the referendum, but was carved up by his oppo Michael Gove, who clearly still fancies his own chances of becoming Prime Minister. Don't they all? But when Boris turned up on TV at the weekend with a smart new haircut, my heart sank. This is no longer about BREXIT It's about HIM. THEN I read that Boris is apparently part of a Tory leadership dream ticket with Amber Rudd. I'm sorry, I'll just read that again. This is the same Look back in Amber who not so long ago was slagging off Boris, accusing him of not being safe in taxis. Now were asked to believe they're Westminster's lovey-dovey answer to Seann and Katya whoever they are). I'm only surprised that Amber hasn't had a Mrs Thatcher perm-that's if Esther Mc Rantzen, or whatever her name is, hasn't beaten her to it. And so this is Christmas, and what have they done? Apart from squabbling among themselves- NOTHING. My best guess is still that a grubby deal has been done and may yet be revived. But after yesterday, I wouldn't bank on anything any more. The political class must think that we're so stupid and bored with the whole business that we'll accept any deal they can cobble together. And, you know what , sadly maybe they're right. I'm a Brexiteer. Get me OUT  of here! *  *  * [The present political system is bankrupt. Only PR can save our nation from eventual Despotism. AS we have stated over the past decades Members of Parliament should ONLY serve one TERM in office which should ensure that MPs will in the main do the best they can for THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS and THEIR COUNTRY.  It will ensure that those from all  walks of life have the opportunity to SERVE THEIR PEOPLE and THEIR COUNTRY. Not as now when the greater majority have decided ONLY TO SERVE THEMSELVES.] * *...HOWEVER brexit works out, or doesn't , there seems to be no end to mass immigration. The number of EU citizens settling in Britain may have fallen since the referendum, but arrivals from the rest of the world have hit a 14 year high. A quarter of a million more people came here from outside the EU than left in the past year, an increase of 40 per cent. It was another triumph for Mother Theresa,who-don't forget-was in charge of IMMIGRATION at the HOME OFFICE until the the keys to Number 10 dropped into her lap... More! *  *  * RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: I'm a Brexiteer get me out of here! | Daily Mail...     [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]   DECEMBER 11,2018 H.F.1763

*

 

Macron's porkies and why the EU risks recession to teach us a Brexit lesson *   THE DOMINIC LAWSON COLUMN Monday, January 21, 2018 DOMINIC LAWSON: Macron risking recession just to teach us a Brexit lesson.  THERE'S no doubt about who is the favourite politician of anti-Brexiteers in this country. It's someone who doesn't even stand for election here. It's not Tony Bliar, still less John Major. No: their hero is Emmanuel Macron, the President of the Republic of France. Last week the Independent online newspaper which campaigns for a second Brexit referendum to overturn the result of the first) adoringly headlined an account of Macron's latest attack attack on Brexit as follows: French President delivers brilliant speech after Theresa May's deal is rejected by MPs.'   Actually, it's well worth looking at Macron delivering his onslaught to an audience in Normandy, an area of northern France not far from the Pas-de-Calais region, which is especially vulnerable to any trade disruptions in the event of a NO DEAL-BREXIT Their President attempted to reassure them that it would be the  'British who would be first to suffer' if there were csuch an outcome, and went on, not for the first time, to denounce what he termed 'the lies of the Brexit campaign.; and 70 per cent of their But then he immediately unleashed TOO PORKIES OF HIS OWN: 'The British people can't afford to not to have a plane taking off or landing in their country; and 70 per cent of their supermarket supplies come from continental Europe.' In other words, if the British Parliament doesn't accede to the terms brokered by the European Commission, its people will be cut off from the rest of the world and starve. The actual figures, as suplied by the UK's Office for National Statistics, are that 30 per cent of the food we consume is supplied by the EU. Macron's boast of 70 per cent is either extreme grandiosity (not unusual for him) or a deliberate untruth Apocalyptic... And if there were a disorderly Brexit accompanied by the imposition of tariffs on food between the UK and the EU, I would imagine the cheese producers of Normandy might be the least delighted of all. Personally, I would regret it, too, as I adore French cheese, but our domestic producers bare increasingly imaginative and entrepreneurial: why, there is even something called Somerset Brie. And at Christmas, I tried the new British cheese known as Winslade a remarkable cross between Vacherin and Camembert. It was gorgeous, a more than acceptable substitute for either of those two great French creations. As for Madcron's apocalyptic assertion that no planes would be able to enter or leave the UK if we left the EU without an agreement, this is the most preposterous iteration of PROJECT FEAR yet to be deployed in supposedly serious argument/ For Macron knows as well as anyone- as the European Commission would not have agreed this without the support of the French Government- that Brussels has published contingency plans if the UK leaves the EU without a deal; they set out that UK airlines will continue to be able to operate flights between the EU and this country for at least 12 months. Decline...  So why is the French President lashing out in this way? The campaign for the European Parliament elections is imminent and he is extremely concerned that the profoundly Eurosceptic National Rally Party, formerly known as the Front National and led by Marine Le Pen, will make big gains. Note, by the way, Madame Le Pen herself is a representative of the Pas-de-Calais region. Although she is no longer advocating 'FREXIT' Macron is driven by the conviction that if BREXIT is not visibly terrible for the UK, then Marine Le Pen's Euroscepticism will gain tremendous traction in France. Indeed, when asked about this a year ago by the BBC's Andrew Marr, Macron admitted that if the French were to hold a referendum THEY WOULD 'PROBABLY VOTE TO LEAVE. Then, Macron was still in his pomp, feted as a fresh voice of leadership for a European Union confident in its future, while the UK sank into Brexit-related economic decline.It's looking a bit different now. Macron-his opinion poll ratings having collapsed at a speed and a rate unprecedented in modern political history-has been forced into a humiliating reversal of central elements in his programme. It was his only choice after the Country's very stability was threatened by popular revolt on the streets. More ominously for the Eurozone as a whole, it is not just in France, where industrial output is now contracting: the same in GERMANY. And ITALY  appears to be in FULL RECESSION. As the International Trade Secretary Liam Fox pointed out yesterday, the most recent official figures show the  UK ECONOMY Performing marketly better than those three largest Eurozone member states. And, should the worst come to the worst, with another European-wide RECESSION it is the BRITISH BANKS' which are the best capatalised,  and the regional banks in  Italy  and Germany THE MOST VULNERABLE More to follow shortly The Guardian's chief economic commentator Larry Elliot observed a fortnight ago: 'Britain's debate on Brexit currently seems based on three propositions. That continental Europe is thriving; that Europe's politicians will come under pressure to cut a deal from their big companies; and that Britain is well adrift at the bottom of Europe's economic league table. ALL THREE ARE FALSE. That was prescient. Last week the president of Germany's industrial federation, Dieter Kempf, told journalists in Berlin that the British parliament's rejection of the WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT took matters' dangerously close to a chaotic Bexit' which would leave his members (the biggest German companies) 'Staring into the abyss. If the British Parliament is to avert this then that is most likely to require a change in the 'Irish backstop' ostensibly in order to protect peace on the island of Ireland, this element in the withdrawal agreement means that until a future trade is agreed the UK will never be able to escape the EU's customs union. WE could be stuck in a non-voting limbo. It is principally this which caused a mass of Conservative MPs to reject Mrs May's deal in the Commons last week: without winning them back, she has no chance of a different outcome in a future vote. Although the 'indefinite' backstop is the pride and joy of the Irish Government-it was designed principally to address concerns-there is now great anxiety in Dublin about what will happen if it turns out to be the reason for a NO DEAL being agreed at all. * Unprepared Last week the head of the Irish Exporters Association, Simon McKeever, declared the country was 'totally unprepared for a NO DEAL BREXIT: 'If it happens, to put it bluntly, we are screwed.' Unfortunately for Mr McKeever's concerns, or indeed for those of German exporters and French farmers, I see vanishing little chance of the European Union reopening the WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT which Mrs May failed so dismally to sell to the Commons. With some reason  they don't believe Theresa May will ever go for a 'NO DEAL' BREXIT And even if she did, they think it's worth risking recession throughout Europe if that's necessay throughout Europe if that's whats necessary to teach Brexiting Brits a lesson. AS if to demonstrate that mindset in Brussels, the French magazine Le Point last week reported a conversation from 2016 with the EU's chief negotiator Michel Barnier, in which the Frenchman declared 'I shall have succeeded in my task if the final deal is so hard on the British that in the end they'll prefer staying in the EU. We can't say we weren't warned. But I don't see the British people quailing in the face of President Macron's latest threats. The British Parliament, however is another matter. Monday, January 21,2018 [IF WE HOLD OUR NERVE AND TAKE THE 'NO DEAL' ROUTE OUT OF THE EU  A FREE BRITAIN WILL SOON BE GREAT BRITAIN - ONCE MORE!] [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]   H.F.1783

*

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis by Benjamin Fulford   Author: Benjamin Fulford 2018-12-17 Donate My Account Subscription Details Update Credit Card Edit Profile Register Log In   Secret head of world finance, Cardinal Pell, fired and big changes coming By Benjamin Fulford Weekly Reports, White Dragon Society  197 Comments Last week Cardinal George Pell was found guilty of sexually abusing children by an Australian court and was subsequently fired by Pope Francis because he was “elderly.” https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/12/12/cardinal-pell-top-advisor-pope-francis-found-guilty-historical-sexual-offenses This is huge news in the secret world of finance, because Pell was the person in charge of financial matters at the Vatican and thus was a secret controller of most world government leaders, P2 Freemason and CIA sources say.  This is because when most world rulers take power, they get a visit from an official of the Vatican Bank who hands them a bank book with an astronomical number written in it (a billion dollars or more for big countries;  less for smaller countries).  They are then told, “Welcome to the world of the rich,” and are gently reminded that if they refuse to accept the money they will be “removed.” This is the choice of silver or lead that has allowed the Vatican P2 Freemason Lodge, run by descendants of the Caesars, to secretly rule most world governments.  The 200 leaders who last week affirmed the fraudulent “carbon causes global warming” agreement are all slaves of this system, P2 Freemason and CIA sources agree. https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/12/14/18139402/cop24-climate-change-katowice-poland Thus, the removal of the head of this secret control system will have huge repercussions for world finance and politics, depending on who is selected to replace him, and also depending on whether or not this secret system will be allowed to continue. On that front, another huge news item (still not fully confirmed because it only comes from one royal family source) is that a new head of the Committee of 300, the secret government of the 13 ruling bloodline families, will take power next year.  This means Queen Elizabeth will be handing the committee reins to a younger person (hint:  not Charles and not William). With this caveat in mind (i.e., only one source), here some excerpts from a statement by the soon-to-be-appointed new committee head:  “The 13 ruling bloodlines and I have had enough of this world and the minions charged with its curation.  All Sovereign Heads of State and all respective governments fired.  Ordo ab Chao.” The source also said, “Sir Alexander Younger at MI6 is already briefed, along with the Queen in London and the Emperor in Tokyo,” about this development. The statement further read that, “The Habsburg dynasty and spin-offs—most criminally psychopathic—have …   The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net Please Log In or Register to create an account.     2018-12-21 Benjamin Fulford Talks: Interview Dec. 18, 2018 with Prepare for Change By Benjamin Fulford Videos, White Dragon Society  0 Comments Here is Benjamin Fulford’s December 18, 2018 interview with PrepareforChange.net: Benjamin Fulford Interview: Ding Dong the Sherff is dead, Military Tribunals are now ahead! – 13th Dec 2018 – Prepare For Change   2018-12-13 Previous JCS Chairman By Benjamin Fulford Letters to the Editor  0 Comments Ben:  Enjoy your weekly newsletters and I put more credence in you than any other source.  I’m curious about your comment in last newsletter, “as the previous JCS Chairman was Army.”  I believe you’ll find that Gen. Joseph Dunford was a United States Marine.  Means a lot to us former active duty Marines!  Have a great day. I was referring to his predecessor Mike Dempsey, since Dunford is still JCS Chairman for now. –BF     2018-12-10 Secret war centers on SWIFT after George Bush Sr. is executed By Benjamin Fulford Weekly Reports  311 Comments Since the death of Nazi Fourth Reich Fuhrer George Bush Sr., the battle for control of the world’s financial system, and thus of the process of deciding humanity’s future, is now centering on control of the SWIFT international interbank electronic transfer system. A final battle is taking place between the 13 bloodlines which have traditionally controlled the planet, and the meritocratic Gnostic Illuminati who control the U.S. military-industrial complex, multiple sources agree.  The battle is heading for a climax of sorts now that George Bush Senior has been “executed,” as confirmed by both Pentagon and CIA sources. Here is what a CIA source had to say: “I have been told by two sources that G.H.W. Scherff (Bush) was actually indicted on September 10, 2018 for crimes against humanity, child trafficking, sedition, and treason.  He allegedly plea-bargained a deal with the military tribunal hearing his case, to be executed/suicided to keep his legacy intact for his family and the sheeple.  Trump signed the death order.  So was it a clone that was executed, since we also have intel that he died in June (another clone).  I think Bush/Scherff actually died in January 1992, choking on sushi and then finished off by Barbara Bush with a poisoned cloth (as seen in the video posted last week).  Military tribunals are set to begin on January 2, 2019.” Pentagon sources, for their part, said U.S. President Donald “Trump was careful not give Bush 41 a state funeral, as this executed criminal was denied a horse and caisson like Reagan got.” “To the victor belong the spoils, for Trump picked former Bush Attorney General Bill Parr as his next AG and he chose ‘the day that will live in infamy,’ December 7th [the Pearl Harbor anniversary] to do it,” the Pentagon source added. The CIA source also wondered if Barr made “a deal to avoid military tribunals and then be ‘McCained’? (the term being used lately for execution/suicide).  Maybe he flipped like Senator Lindsey Graham?” The death of Bush, the former U.S. Ambassador to China whose brother handed over U.S. military secrets to that country (as did Hillary and Bill Clinton), means that the U.S. and China are also heading to a showdown as bloodline families seek Chinese protection, according to secret society sources. Pentagon sources say the arrest of Chinese conglomerate Huawei’s Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou “is aimed to …   The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net Please Log In or Register to create an account.     2018-12-10 Queensland fire twisters: a naturally occurring phenomenon By Benjamin Fulford Letters to the Editor  2 Comments Greetings from Australia, Ben: Thank you so much for the narrative you provide us with on a weekly basis and for your direct involvement in the demise of “malevolents” by attempting to bring equality to those presently incarnated on this beautiful planet. The pictures below are of a naturally occurring phenomenon that usually occurs at the end of the dry season, when the atmosphere is all but devoid of humidity. I know them as “willie-willies” and have also heard them called “dust-devils.”  They are most commonly seen on the flatter country in their dust form and will also form very readily when fire is present. It is my belief that these are not the result of leo, DEW platforms, unlike what has been perpetrated on the populations of the West Coast of the not-so-United-States-of-America. I have no problem, though, with the notion that a majority of the fires are being “started” and enhanced by the obvious weather manipulations that have been and still are perpetrated upon this continent (Australia) and our neighbour New Zealand for many years now. Please keep up the excellent work you are doing, and may the tyranny that has held sway on this planet for so long be replaced by a more universally beneficial alternative way of being in the very near future. —IH Thanks for the information;  I will let my readers know. —BF Comment Author Info     H.F.1767

*

DAILY EXPRESS LEO McKINSTRY     [A GROSS FAILURE OF DIRECTION  OVER DECADES BY A SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY.] * News for DAILY EXPRESS-TORIES ARE PARALYSED... TOO INEPT TO DEAL WITH CRIME AND DEBT...  by LEO McKINSTRY Daily Express columnist DECEMBER 3,2018 Brexit should and start an invigorating new chapter in our island story be a golden opportunity for our nation to regain INDEPENDENCE and start an invigorating new chapter in our island story. But in the hands of the enfeebled Tory government the process of WITHDRAWAL  from the EU has been turned into the GREATEST POLITICAL CRISIS  since the SECOND WORLD WAR . Rather than embracing the SPIRIT of the 2016 VOTE Westminster is gripped by TURMOIL. Amid the high-profile resignations, backbench revolts and fevered leadership speculation, the every very act of DEPARTURE is now threatened by the prospect of Parliamentary stalemate or a second referendum. At the heart of this mess is a chronic failure of imagination and courage by the political establishment. Unable to contemplate life for Britain outside the EU, Theresa May and the ruling elite have produced a zombie Brexit proposal that could LEAVE US IN A TWILIGHT ZONE OF INDEFINITE BRUSSELS CONTROL. The DEAL is so unpopular that the Government is resorting to a desperate reprise of PRODUCT FEAR in their attempt to push it through the COMMONS. Yet institutionalised cowardice applies far more widely than just BREXIT. What Ministers now suffer from  is a collective lose of nerve Paralysed by their own caution and ineptitude they seem to have abandoned faith in CONSERVATIVE VALUES preferring surrender to the PROGRESSIVE ORTHODOXY The result is an accelerating breakdown in CREDIBILITY  AND RESOLVE. That pattern can be found in every field of governance. The Tories used to be the party of LAW AND ORDER but today they preside over a society where CRIME IS SPIRALLING OUT OF CONTROL. while the police are emasculated. Official statistics show that 120 knife attacks are recorded every single day with the total of such offences surging to 21,602 in the first six months of 2018. Similarly over the last year, overall violent crime went up by 19 per cent and robberies 23 per cent. Yet in the face of this lawlessness police numbers continue to dwindle. Even when thugs are apprehended they are treated with dangerous leniency. A recent survey found that just a third of violent offenders are given custodial sentences. When she first became Prime Minister Theresa May famously spoke of her determination to confront "burning injustices" But perhaps the greatest injustice of all is the acceptance by the state of appalling levels of criminality. In the same vein, the Conservatives once had a reputation for strong defence, yet recent years have seen a dramatic decline in the strength of OUR ARMED FORCES. As disturbingly the spending priorities have been grossly warped by vain globalist ambitions. So over £6billion is squandered on two gigantic aircraft carriers, which consume much of the Royal Navy's resources in their own protection, though there are just two Border Force patrol boats to guard the entire English Channel... * * * WE HAVE REACHED BARELY HALF OF THIS MOST ENLIGHTENING AND INFORMATIVE ARTICLE AND AS OBSERVERS OF THE POLITICAL SCENE FOR DECADES WE HAVE SEEN THIS GATHERING MOMENTUM AS THE YEARS PASSED. ONCE A NATION LOSES ITS CONNECTION WITH ITS PAST THEN THE FUTURE WILL FALL INTO CHAOS AND CONFUSION. WE SHALL SHORTLY RETURN .IN THE MEANWHILE CLICK BELOW FOR FULL ARTICLE.     News for DAILY EXPRESS-TORIES ARE PARALISED... TOO INEPT TO DEAL WITH CRIME AND DEBT by LEO McKINSTRY Tories are paralysed, too inept to deal with crime and debt..., says LEO MCKINSTRY DECEMBER 3,2018 [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!] H.F.1757

*

Why I, an avowed Remainer  believe a second referendum would poison politics for a generation. by Dominic Sandbrook Tuesday, December 18, 2018 'This is a huge decision for our country, perhaps the biggest we will make in our lifetimes. and it will be the final decision...when the british people speak their voice will be respected-not ignored [as in december 2018]. if we vote to leave, then we WILL LEAVE there will not be another renegotiation and another referendum.' David Cameron. The date  was November 10,2015 and those were the words of David Cameron, setting out his plans for the EU referendum he had promised in his election manifesto a few months earlier. You can hardly say he wasn't clear. During the campaign that followed, both sides stuck to the same script. This was a moment of decision, a one-off showdown that would never be repeated. As the official leaflets sent to every home put it, 'the Government will implement what you decide.' Haughty... Three years on, however, those promises are beginning to look increasingly fragile. In a recent months a hysterical campaign for a so-called 'Peoples Vote' has ben gathering strength, with heavy promotion from the BBC THE GUARDIAN and much of the pseudo-intellectual liberal elite. Until recently it was easy to write them off as a coalition of sore losers, united only by their obsession with the EU and their haughty disregard for the 17.4 MILLION who had the impudence to vote LEAVE.  But now it seems, their campaign is closer to fruition than ever. Thanks to the deadlock in Parliament, where Theresa May's hard-won deal with the EU [We hardly think so as this was no doubt already in place possibly even well over a year ago.] seems hopelessly becalmed, a new referendum is becoming a much stronger possibility. Even some of Mrs May's Cabinet have apparently come round to the idea. The Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd, for example, pointedly said on Sunday that a second referendum should 'not be off  the table', which flatly contradicts the Prime Minister's line over the past years. Yet in purely logistical terms, a second referendum would be a NIGHTMARE. There is perilously little time to get legislation through before Britain leaves the EU on March 29,2019. And what would be the question? Mrs May's deal or no deal?Mrs May's deal or Remain? Or some combination of all three, with two rounds of voting. As political scientists have shown, the outcome could depend entirely on the method chosen. For example, if Leave votes were split between two different Brexit options, then Remain could waltz through the middle without winning a majority, which would be manifestly wrong. More importantly, though, a second referendum would be morally wrong -and I say that as someone who voted Remain. Campaigners for a 'People's vote' (who voted in the last one-aliens?) pretend that it represents the democratic way forward. But this strikes me as NONSENSE If two referendums are more democratic than one, why stop with two? Why not three, four or five? Why not have a referendum every week? I know plenty of fervent People's Vote enthusiasts. Every one voted Remain. Far  from being fans of referendums in general, they were appalled by David Cameron's decision to let the common people decide their future. When they talk piously about wanting the 'final say on the deal' or wanting 'more democracy', THEY ARE BEING DISHONEST. They  do not want more democracy; they want less of it. And if they get their way and britain stayed in the e u, you can be sure they would never support another referendum. Given that I supported Remain, some readers may wonder why I don't agree with THEM  The answer is that I am a democrat. The nature of democracy means that you don't confuse your own personal prejudices with divine wisdom, and try to accept defeat with good grace. Unfortunately, the likes of Tony Blair, Nick Clegg, and Alastair Campbell don't see things that way. United in hysterical outrage, they are the spoiled brats of the political world, who simply cannot cope with losing. For the past two years, Mr Blair and Mr Clegg, in particular, have rarely been far from Brussels, pouring poison into the ears of the EU elite, urging them not to make concessions to Britain, and promising that they would get a second referendum eventually. I hesitate to use the word 'treachery' but there comes a point when no other word will do. A genuine patriot would put his personal convictions to one side and work in the interests of the democratic majority. But when it comes to the crunch, does anyone really believe Mr Blair and Mr Clegg would side with Britain? The People's Vote website claims that 'new facts have come to light about the complexity of Brexit that no one could have known at the time of the referendum'. THIS IS A LIE, PURE AND SIMPLE. There are no new facts. The Remain campaign made precisely the same argument in 2016, and millions chose to dismiss it. Why insult them by forcing them to vote again? AS for the argument a second plebiscite would heal divisions of the past two years, this is dangerous nonsense SMUG... A second referendum campaign would almost certainly be even more angry and impassioned than the first. As Mrs May has pointed out, the air would be thick with accusations of BETRAYAL 17.4MILLION people feeling that their democratically expressed instruction HAD BEEN IGNORED. Imagine the reaction in towns and cities far from Westminster. Imagine how people would feel in Stoke on Trent, where 69 per cent voted LEAVE ; or Hull, where 68 per cent voted LEAVE The second reforendum advocates, smug in their university-town bubbles, never bother to imagine what these people think. They don'tlive in these towns, and if they think about their inhabitants at all, it is to sneer at them as knuckle-dragging racists. But here is how it would look from Wakefield. It would look as though a spoiled political and intellectual elite, cut off by its own privilege from the views of ordinary people, had conspired to betray democracy and STEAL THE BREXIT VOTE. And you can be sure of one thing, the millions of Tory supporters who voted LEAVE would abandon the party in droves. It could be out of power for many years to come the next time a general election came round.  [In many towns and cities of the SHIRES many Brexit Labour voters will surely look for other new political parties to support.] Who would benefit from a 'People's Vote'? Jeremy Corbyn might, depending on his position during the campaign. (So far he seems to have been reluctant to offer any cogent opinion at all, either because he wants to disguise his true position on Brexit for narrow partisan gain, or because he is simply not bright enough to grasp the issues at hand. ) POISONOUS... Ukip certainly would. So would even more poisonous groups and characters on the far-right, such as the English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson, who was much to the fore in a 'Brexit Betrayal' march last week. Is that really what the ultra remainers want? Are they so indifferent to the health of our political; commonwealth? Do they really think their own prejudices are worth more that the PRINCIPLE OF DEMOCRACY. If our politicians want a way through this impasse, there is an obvious answer. The EU should make concessions on the much-discussed Irish back-stop, and then our MPs should get behind Mrs May's hard-won deal-a compromise which, although not perfect, is the best chance of honouring the BREXIT VOTE without destroying our economy. By contrast, a second referendum would be a victory for hysteria over pragmatism. It would poison our politics for a generation, driving a wedge between ordinary voters and the entitled elite. And, if you doubt it, just ask yourself one question. If after all the promises, there is a second referendum, why would anybody ever trust politicians again? *  *  * [It should be remembered that the EU tactic on referendums was to not accept a NO vote but as the facts of the build up of that  Enemy of Democracy divulge ,it continued to pressure once free nation states to campaign until the yes vote was obtained. This tells you all you need to know of the undemocratic nature of that cunning and conniving beast in Brussels.  Those who consider themselves Remainers must surely have understood the nature of the political background of the so-called European Union with its established birth in the minds of the Nazi leaders during World War II. Mrs May who has a history of association with the German Chancellor Frau Merkel has taken years to come up with HER EU's plan which to true Brexit voters is a SELL-OUT!, As we have stated many times only a HARD determined approach can secure a satisfactory DEAL or a  even a NO DEAL as present events appear to show. For a nation with a world renowned Democratic history to  find itself treated with distain by the captive members of the so-called EU some of whom owed their discarded national freedom to British diplomacy and intervention, who are now subjected people many of whom are now becoming slowly aware of the Beast of Burden to which they are now no better than SLAVES.]   News for dominic sandbrook Daily Mail DOMINIC SANDBROOK: I believe second referendum would poison politics Daily Mail - 11 hours ago DOMINIC SANDBROOK: If we vote to leave, then we will leave. There will not be another renegotiation and another referendum a those were the words .of David Cameron' The date was November 10, 2015, and ... *  *  * [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!} FIND OUT More!   H.F.1766

*

 

THE GUARDIAN     LATEST!   Theresa May postpones Brexit deal vote Theresa May has postponed the final vote on her Brexit deal, in a clear admission by the prime minister that she does not believe she can get the unpopular withdrawal agreement through the House of Commons at this time. As sources confirmed the development, the Speaker’s office said May would give an oral statement to the House of Commons on the European Union at 3.30pm. It will be immediately followed by a business statement from the leader of the House of Commons, Andrea Leadsom, implying that she will confirm the procedural details of the postponement of tomorrow’s vote. A vote could take place next week or even be delayed until early January, although this would allow less time for the ensuing Brexit legislation to be passed through parliament before 29 March. The ultimate deadline for the vote is 21 January. News of the delay caused the pound to tumble to its lowest level in 18 months. The prime minister spoke to cabinet colleagues on Monday morning in a hastily arranged conference call, after apparently concluding she could not win over enough of the 100 Tory MPs who said they were against the deal. The postponement so close to the vote is a significant blow to May’s authority, although it will theoretically give her extra time to negotiate with the European Union and to win over hostile Tory MPs. Angry Tory rebels and Labour MPs vowed that they would attempt to force the government to hold a vote. However, a government source says there would be no vote on a business motion to cancel Tuesday’s vote. “We are replacing the business with a new statement but it isn’t a motion and therefore isn’t voteable,” the source said. Children’s minister Nadhim Zahawi said on Twitter that the prime minister had “listened to colleagues” and would now “head to Brussels to push back on the backstop.” But a European commission spokesman insisted that there was no scope for negotiation, saying: “This deal is the best and only deal possible. We will not renegotiate the deal that is on the table right now. That is very clear. “Our position has therefore not changed and as far as we’re concerned the UK is leaving the EU on the 29 March 2019. We are prepared for all scenarios.” That view was echoed by Ireland’s taoiseach Leo Varadkar, who told reporters “it is not possible” to renegotiate the backstop. “The reason we’ve ended up in the solution we have is because of the red lines the UK itself laid down,” he said. While he said he would not object to the issuing of statements clarifying the meaning of the agreement, he cautioned that no clarification could go against what had already been agreed. The Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, said: “The government has decided Theresa May’s Brexit deal is so disastrous that it has taken the desperate step of delaying its own vote at the eleventh hour. “We have known for at least two weeks that Theresa May’s worst-of-all-worlds deal was going to be rejected by parliament because it is damaging for Britain.” Steve Baker, one of the leaders of the hard Brexit European Research Group, said postponement was “essentially a defeat” of the Prime Minister’s Brexit deal. Recalling the prime minister’s general election slogan, the rebel MP added: “The terms of the WA [withdrawal agreement] were so bad that they didn’t dare put it to Parliament for a vote. This isn’t the mark of a stable government or a strong plan.” Downing Street and key ministers have repeatedly said the vote would not be delayed, in an attempt to concentrate the minds of MPs. Earlier on Monday morning, Michael Gove categorically stated the vote would go ahead. Asked on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme if the vote was “definitely, 100%” going to happen, the environment secretary replied: “Yes”. Pressed on the point, he said: “The vote is going ahead.” The prime minister conducted a frantic round of telephone diplomacy over the weekend, speaking to Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, and Mark Rutte, the Dutch prime minister, Number 10 confirmed. She had also spoken to Leo Varadkar, the Irish prime minister, as well Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the European commission, and Donald Tusk, the president of the EU council. Insiders said she had spoken to cabinet members to update them on the outcome of the calls, amid intense pressure from hard Brexit Conservative backbenchers to renegotiate the withdrawal agreement to remove the unpopular Northern Ireland backstop. But both May and the EU have previously said there is no prospect to alter a deal that has already been signed off by heads of government on both sides. DECEMBER 10-2018 *  *  * [IT WAS BOUND TO HAPPEN WITH A RABID PRO EU PRIME MINISTER AT THE HELM OF GOVERNMENT. THE GRIEVOUS FAULT OF RANK AND FILE CONSERVATIVE MPS. A BREXIT PM SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY APPOINTED WITHOUT DELAY .] * * * [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!] DECEMBER 10,2018   H.F.1755

*

Why NO Treaty LIMITING EU powers CAN EVER be RELIED ON.   On the 50th anniversary of the treaty of Rome a leading barrister describes the role of the European Court of Justice in expanding the powers of the EU   by Martin Howe QC   [Eurofacts 6th April, 2007] Vol 12 No 13   What is the key feature that makes the Treaty of Rome different in kind from every other international Treat to which this country belongs, and quite possibly makes it unique in the world? To this question, a lawyer can give only one answer: the key feature is Community Law -a system of law that penetrates inside the member states and takes precedence over national laws in the domestic courts of member states. Many treaties bind states with rules at the international or external level - but it is this internal penetration which marks out the TREATY OF ROME -as different from other treaties. In fact this internal penetration is a classic characteristic, not of international treaties, but of the internal constitutional arrangements of FEDERAL STATES. And like a federal state, the EUROPEAN UNION -has its own SUPREME COURT the EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE -which has the ULTIMATE POWER -of decision over both CONTENT and the SCOPE of COMMUNITY LAW.   Profound Changes This court is not neutral or impartial interpreter of the rules. The perspective of looking back over 50 years allows us to see clearly how profoundly the TREATY of ROME -has been changed from what it was in 1957. I am not speaking here of the many changes of text which have been made by successive amending treaties such as the Single European Act Maastricht or Nice. I am talking of the profound changes in the effective content of the Treaty which have occurred as a result of a process of so-called "INTERPRETATION" -of the Treaty by the Court. The key point that Treaty articles have direct effect inside the member states is nowhere stated in the TREATY -but was decided by the EUROPEAN COURT in the Van Gend en Loos case in 1963. It said: "The treaty is more than an agreement which merely creates mutual obligations between the contracting states. This view is confirmed by the preamble to the Treaty which refers not only to governments but to peoples....the Community constitutes a new legal order in international law for whose benefit the states have limited their sovereign rights, albeit within limited fields, and the subjects of which comprise not only the Member States but also their nationals".   Sovereign Rights   Shortly afterwards in 1964 in the Costa v. ENEL case, the Court ruled that COMMUNITY LAW -over-rides conflicting national laws:   " The transfer by the States from their domestic legal system to the Community system of rights and obligations arising under the Treaty carries with it a permanent limitation of their sovereign rights..." [So since 1963 politicians who later claimed that there would be NO LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY -were lying and are still lying to the BRITISH PEOPLE We have only days ago put on our bulletin board some comments from Lord Carrington about the interference of the European Union in matters which should be none of their concern. From the early days of the Treaty of Rome thousands of politicians have lied -From Macmillan-Edward Heath-Kenneth Clarke and every prime minister and government -with the only objections raised by Margaret Thatcher who only later realised the danger which she disregarded decades before and even Conservative MEPs today in 2007 still hold onto the hope that they can change the EU when the only thing worth having was given up over 40 years ago. A dagger was derisively thrust into the heart of nation -state sovereign power by the European Court  in 1963/1964 and Britain alone of all States with its long history of over a thousand years of freedom should have kept faith with those who won that freedom so long ago.]   By 1970, in Internationale Handelgesellschaft, the European Court had declared its view that Community LAW should take precedence even over the constitutional laws of Member States -including basic entrenched laws guaranteeing FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. In the  1987 Foto-Frost case, the European Court ruled that national courts had no power to question the validity of Community measures and reserved that power exclusively to ITSELF -even though there is nothing in the Treaty or in general principles of INTERNATIONAL LAW -which would require  STATES -to recognise the VALIDITY OF ACTS -which are OUTSIDE THE POWERS conferred by the TREATY * During the early period of the [so-called] Common Market, free market economists would have approved of the Court's activism in the field of free movement of goods. BUT -this activism became a Poisoned Chalice -since the Court made clear that it regarded a   EUROPEAN FREE MARKET -not as an END in ITSELF , but simply a MEANS to a GREATER END. Concrete Progress The Court spelled out its thinking in 1992 in the European Economic Area Agreement Case: " An international treaty is to be interpreted not only on the basis of its wording, but in the light of its objectives. ...The Rome Treaty aims to achieve economic integration leading to the establishment of an internal market and economic and monetary union. Article 1 of the Single European Act makes it clear that the objective of all the Community treaties is to contribute together to making concrete progresss towards European unity. It follows from the foregoing that the provisions of the Rome treaty on free movement and competition, far from being an END in THEMSELVES, are only means for obtaining those objectives. ... As the Court of Justice has consistently held, the COMMUNITY TREATIES ESTABLISHED A NEW LEGAL ORDER for the benefit of which the States have limited their SOVEREIGN RIGHTS -in ever wider fields, -and the subjects of which comprise not only the member States but also their nationals. [emphasis added]". In the last sentence, the important change in wording from 1963 Van Gend case - should be noted. By 1992, "limited fields"  become "ever wider fields" -reflecting the Court's endorsement of the doctrine that there can only ever be a one-way transfer of powers from member states to the centre. [Do you now understand Mr Nice Guy Dave and many of your MEPs who are always harping about retrieving  POWER back from BRUSSELS] The Court has also expanded powers of the Community over the external relations of the member states. It developed a doctrine of implied external competence - that the Community has power to make external agreements relating to fields over which it has acquired internal competence. Furthermore, under this doctrine, the member states lose their own powers to conclude international agreements relating to areas of policy over which the COMMUNITY -has attained an internal competence. Under this doctrine, in 2002 the Bermuda Agreement between the UK and the US relating to trans-Atlantic air transport was struck down. British Airways at the time welcomed the fact that such arrangements would in future be negotiated by the EU rather than bilaterally. I must confess to a slight sensation of schadenfreude at British Airways' present reaction to what the EU has apparently succeeded in negotiating on our behalf. Whilst the Court has liberalised the internal market, it has often used its growing powers over the external trade of member states in a way which inhibits the liberalisation across the external borders of the EU. In the 1998 Silhouette case, it interpreted the Trade Marks Directive -as requiring member states to prohibit so-called "parallel imports" -of genuine trade marked goods from non-member states when the proprietor of the mark has not consented to the marketing of his goods into the Community. This enables trade mark proprietors to prevent the importation of their own genuine goods into the EC from other countries where they have placed them on the market (e.g. the USA), so enabling them to charge consumers within the EC a higher price than in other markets. Similarly, in the field of regulations and technical standards, the Court has ruled in the 1999 Agrochemicals case that the UK is prohibited by Community Law from licensing "parallel imports" -from non-EC countries, even though the products are identical to agrochemicals licensed inside the EC and made by the same manufacture. The economic rationale of this "fortress Europe" -mentally is baffling, and it cuts against OUR -global trade obligations under the World Trade Organisation on Technical Barriers to Trade. * Onward Progress Where the onward progress of European integration has been blocked by national vetoes, the Court has been willing to reinterpret the Treaty to make up for the lack of progress on the legislative front. In a whole series of recent tax cases, the Court has invoked the general clauses of the treaty on non-discrimination to strike down national tax legislation. An important example is the 2002 Lankhorst-Hohorst case on tax credits on payments by a subsidiary to its parent in another member state. What is significant is that the Court departed from its earlier cases which had decided that such arrangements were compatible with the Treaty. The Treaty had not been changed, but its meaning, according to the Court, had. Thus , the effective harmonisation of direct taxes proceeds step by step at the hands of the Court despite the UK's theoretical veto on this area under the Treaty. More recently in the 2005 environmental protection case, the Court decided that the EC can, under its first-pillar supranational law-making powers, specify and impose criminal offences and penalties in the very wide fields where the EC has an existing competence. The remarkable thing about this decision is that, if it is right, the EEC had these powers over criminal law from the day the TREATY of ROME -was signed on 25th March 1957. Yet if this had been suggested to those who signed the Treaty in 1957, or to those who signed Britain's  Accession Treaty -in 1972, they would have laughed   We see, with the perspective of 50 years, how powerful has been the effect of the rolling process of reinterpretation of the TREATY of ROME -carried out by the Court over that period. WHAT CONCLUSION SHOULD WE DRAW FROM THIS? If we believe that it is right to halt or reverse the ongoing process of the transfer of powers from the UK to the European institutions, then we should recognise a simple point. We saw how the so-called Social chapter opt-out negotiated at Maastricht was rapidly undermined by the abuse of HEALTH and SAFETY POWERS -under the treaty to by-pass the UK's veto on the Working Time Directive.   THIS ABUSE OF THE TREATY WAS OF COURSE SANCTIONED BY THE   EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.   If we remain subject to Community law, and to the European Court's interpretation of the Treaties, no agreement or treaty defining or limiting the powers of Europe can be relied upon -simply because it will be reinterpreted by the Court, over time, to expand those powers again. [Conservative MPs and MEPs please note the above and adjust your records accordingly and remember that the ECoJ has you all by the nose -though many of you are still unaware of how little you can do as you put it- with your supposed influence inside the EU. As to the excuses of the Pro-EU Conservative MP' and MEPs that they were misled from the beginning we know that this was a lie  as shown from publication of details of that era. and the following view of:  Jean Monnet document on the European Coal and Steel Community, June 1950, quoted in Memoirs, 1978 confirms that statement. "The withdrawal of a State which has committed itself to the Community should be possible only if all the others agree to such withdrawal and to the conditions in which it takes place. The rule in itself sums up the fundamental transformation which the French proposal seek to achieve. Over and above coal and steel it is laying the foundations of a European federation. In a federation no Stat can secede by its own unilateral decision. Similarly, there can be no Community except among nations which commit themselves to it with no limit and no looking back' * www.eutruth.org.uk [' A MATTER OF FACT!  A REMINDER TO REMAINERS WHO IN THEIR MILLIONS REFUSED TO PUT FREEDOM AND COUNTRY-CULTURE AND CONSTITUTION FIRST!] H.F.1424 H.F.1651