- (1994 -Official Website -DEC-PT2-2018-)-- 

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018       DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018       

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018      DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018   

  DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018      DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2018-

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY

*
 [A CAUSE WORTH FIGHTING FOR

THE RETURN OF THE FREE NATION STATE

OF

 ENGLAND

-instead of remaining within a threatening-toxic totalitarian so-called European Union- a monstrous- cunning - controlling - captive - calamitous

soon to be

SUPER-STATE.

*

BUT

TO REGAIN

OUR RIGHTFULL INHERITANCE.]

"WE must never cease to proclaim in fearless tones the great principles of freedom and the rights of man which are the joint inheritance of the English-speaking world and which through Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, the Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, and the English Common Law find their most famous expression in the American Declaration of independence..."

 

Part
of an almost 1000 word speech by Winston Churchill at Fulton Missouri,USA in March,1946,

*  *  *
THE END OF THE ENGLISH

By

David Brown

 

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

 HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

 WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

*

[THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID

NOTHING!]

2008

 

 

292

Remember constantly that it was Hitler's intention to unite Europe. (Just as it had been the ambitions of Charlemagne, Charles V, Louis XIV, Napoleon and the Kaiser.)

Remember it was Adolf Hitler who first used the phrase

'The United States of Europe.

Remember  that it was Hitler who had the idea of establishing regions of Europe in order to

DESTROY NATIONAL IDENTITIES.

 

He wanted to break European nations  into regions so that they could be ruled from

BERLIN.

 

MORE!

LINKS to A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/CON30/B404/B308

(www.vernoncoleman.com)

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!}

DECEMBER  5,2018

H.F.1760

*
 

Don't Give In

To

The E U

 

WHY A UK COMPROMISE WITH BRUSSELS WILL CONFINE THEIR CAPTIVE NATION STATES EVEN TIGHTER TO ENSURE THERE CAN BE NO MORE DEFECTORS. WHILE A FIRM RESPONSE FOR A JUST SETTLEMENT FROM THE UK WILL GIVE HEART AND ASSISTANCE TO THOSE FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOTS PRISONERS OF HITLER'S PLANNED EU TO BAND TOGETHER TO FIGHT FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

WE SAY NO! TO COMPROMISE.

It is forgotten that an individual country which makes a decision affecting itself or others has the opportunity to remedy the situation. Whereas, in the EU this is not possible, unless ALL or the permitted number agree to the change and knowing the belligerence of Hitler's brainchild this could have serious and dangerous consequences.

Remember, the responsibility of the UK to assist those captive people's who wish to be

FREE

because it was the blood of British troops in the past that assisted the birth of many of the

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES in EUROPE.

BY STANDING FIRM FOR AN ORDERLY AND JUST EXIT FROM HITLER'S EU WE WILL RECOVER THAT RESPECT THAT OUR BROTHER NATIONS WHO SAW BRITAIN IN 1973 NEGLECT THEIR KIN AROUND THE WORLD FOR AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE WITH A COUNTRY

GERMANY

WHICH IN

TWO WORLD WARS

WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS  AND INJURIES OF MILLIONS AND VAST DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY...FOR WHICH THE LIKE THE WORLD WOULD NOT HAVE  PREVIOUSLY SEEN.

A FREE INDEPENDENT EUROPEAN UNION OF FREE PEOPLE'S WITHIN THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

YES!

THE PRESENT UNDEMOCRATIC-BULLYING EU.

NO!

The fault of our present situation is because of TREASON within the Tory Government of

Edward Heath

 A Nazi spy since 1938 reported to MI5 in 1938 by the Master of Balliol College, Oxford.

 Who in the 70's  and with previous administrations secretly conspired to lead the British people blindfolded into the Nazi-planned EU . It is therefore incumbent on the present Tory Government of Mrs May to bring the situation back to what it was before January 1973. The evidence of Tory wrong-doing has been on our website since 2005.

*

Compromise.

Compromise is but the sacrifice of one right or good in the hope of retaining another,-too often ending in the loss of both,

- Tryon Edwards

*

From the beginning of our history the country has been afflicted with compromise. It is by compromise that human rights have been abandoned. I insist that this shall cease. The country needs repose after all its trials; it deserves repose. And repose can only be found in everlasting principles.-

Charles Sumner

*

A surrender to the Nazi-planned EU would not bring repose to the millions of patriots who wanted their country back. An unjust settlement instead of a Churchillian response will see the battle continue until victory is secured.

Victory

You ask, What is our aim?  I can answer in one word: Victory - victory at all costs, victory in spite of all the terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival.

- Winston Churchill.

FOR THE MILLIONS WHO HAVE DIED IN THE PAST FOR THEIR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND THEIR CAN BE NO SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED UNDEMOCRATIC CAPTIVE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

*  *  *

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

BY

DAVID BROWN

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

 HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

 WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

*

[THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID

NOTHING!]

 

*  *  *

 

 

292

Remember constantly that it was Hitler's intention to unite Europe. (Just as it had been the ambitions of Charlemagne, Charles V, Louis XIV, Napoleon and the Kaiser.)

Remember it was Adolf Hitler who first used the phrase

'The United States of Europe.

Remember  that it was Hitler who had the idea of establishing regions of Europe in order to

DESTROY NATIONAL IDENTITIES.

 

He wanted to break European nations  into regions so that they could be ruled from

BERLIN.

 

MORE!

LINKS to A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/CON30/B404/B308

(www.vernoncoleman.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

THIS COULD BE THE TIME FOR THOSE    MP'S in the SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY  OR OTHERS TO FORM THEIR OWN PATRIOTIC PARTY OF THE CENTRE. TO ATTRACT ALL VOTERS WHO LOVE  THEIR COUNTRY AND UNIQUE -PRIZED CONSTITUTION. WHO WANT IT BACK AS IT STOOD BEFORE JANUARY,1973.

Rees-Mogg-Borris Johnson... TO LEAD THE WAY!

THE EDP WOULD OFFER ITS NAME AND WITHDRAW FROM THE POLITICAL SCENE TO SUCH PATRIOTIC INDIVIDUALS AND AT THE LEAST WOULD SUPPORT SUCH A PARTY.

IN PARLIAMENT WE FIND THERE ARE LOBBY GROUPS SUCH AS FRIENDS OF WHO EVER BUT THERE ARE NO FRIENDS OF ENGLAND .IT IS ABOUT TIME THERE IS A PATRIOTIC BLOCK TO STAND UP FOR ENGLAND AND ITS PAST AND FUTURE. WE HAVE BEEN WAITING TOO LONG FOR A RETURN OF OUR ENGLISH PARLIAMENT - IS LONG OVERDUE.

LETS DO IT!

*  *  *

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

'Destroy [her] fib or sophestry. in vain

The creature's at [her] dirty work again.'

Pope

*

A CALL TO ARMS!

 

'Awake, arise, or be for ever fallen,'

JOHNJohn Milton

[before the Beast of Europe.]

*

The signs are that Mrs May's

PROMISE of BREXIT!

HAS INSTEAD AS MANY HAD ALREADY SUSPECTED YEARS AGO , AS A CONFIRMED REMAINER -SHE WOULD

BRUSSELS IT!

*

'Blest Isle, with matchless beauty crowned

And manly hearts to guard the fair:-

Rule Britannia! rule the waves!

Britons never will be slaves!'

J.THOMSON

[ With a Greater Remainer vote in Wales and Scotland the above verse is no more true,]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

NOVEMBER 14, 2018

*
 

 A DEMOCRACY OR A DICTATORSHIP?

 

[ON DECEMBER 11, 2018 -AFTER OVER TWO YEARS OF NEGOTIATIONS THE COMMONS WILL VOTE ON THE PRIME MINISTER'S' SO-CALLED BREXIT DEAL WHICH AS ALREADY SHOWN IS A SHAM TO PLEASE HER CLOSE FRIENDS IN THE EU. HER ORIGINAL COMMENT OUTSIDE NO10 THAT BREXIT MEANS BREXIT HAS BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE BEEN NOTHING OF THE SORT. SHE HAS SHOWN HERSELF TO BE A LIAR-PERJURER AND TRAITOR-IN THE IMAGE OF ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER PRIME MINISTER  EDWARD HEATH A NAZI SPY FOR 60 YEARS UNTIL HIS DEATH IN 2005. ALMOST THE SAME TACTICS WERE USED-TO KEEP EVERYTHING IN HER HANDS  WITH THE HELP OF TRUSTED CIVIL SERVANTS. FELLOW CONSERVATIVES HAVE. IT APPEARS SHE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN THE VIEWS OF HER CABINET, OR ANY OTHER MP UNLESS THEY MIRROR HER OWN. IF HER BREXIT MINISTERS SHOW PROGRESS SHE SHOWS THEM THE DOOR. SHE ACTS LIKE A SOUTH AMERICAN DICTATOR RATHER THAN A PRIME MINISTER IN THE HOME OF MAGNA CARTA, WE HEAR THAT THAT INDUCEMENTS HAVE BEEN OFFERED TO MPS TO ENSURE HER VOTE IS PASSED IN THE HOME OF ENGLISH DEMOCRACY WHICH SHE AND OTHERS HAVE DONE MUCH TO DESTROY. SURELY IF A CONNECTION IS FOUND OF AN MP CHANGING THEIR VOTE BECAUSE OF INDUCEMENTS OFFERED THAT INDIVIDUAL SHOULD BE SHOWN THE DOOR OF THE COMMONS.]

FRIDAY 28 NOVEMBER,2018

 

 

H.F.1676

*

Letters to the Daily Mail-BREXIT SPECIAL, -Monday,November 19,2018 

 

Time to show some moral fibre

How many of those like me who participated in World War 11 would have chosen to capitulate in the way the Prime Minister has in her Brexit negotiations with the EU

I will be 96 this week and am housebound, but my life wasn't always like this . At 17, in early 1940, I joined the RAF ,serving in Bomber Command at RAF Brize Norton and also at Bletchley  Park. Posted to the Air Ministry in London. I was bombed out and 15 girls in my billet died. My husband was a wireless operator and rear gunner, who returned home from the two-year siege of Malta, weighing five stone. We had determination, pride and above all, moral fibre.

I feel that the once-proud UK has been asset stripped, ground down and told what to do by unelected bureaucrats in Europe. I knew exactly what I wanted from the referendum

TO LEAVE THE EU

I fear for the generations that follow me because the EU seems to want nothing more that to become a FEDERAL STATE.

WHY CAN'T THE GOVERNMENT SHOW SOME MORAL FIBRE?

I AM SO ASHAMED OF THEM ALL

 

Letters to the Daily Mail-BREXIT SPECIAL, -Monday, November 19,2018

R M Wangford -SUFFOLK

[AS a pensioner couple of 87 and 89 we can understand the feelings of the above patriots and only a few days ago we watched the film the DARKEST HOUR. There was a sequence in the film when Winston Churchill was being driven in London after getting so much opposition to his plans from pro German-peace faction and suddenly when his vehicle stopped at a road junction near a tube station he suddenly without notice left the vehicle  in the vicinity of a underground railway station in London and entered it and went on to the platform where the many travellers recognised him. When a tube train arrived he entered the train and was soon in conversation with all the occupants of his carriage to the point that he conversed with everyone getting their names and there feelings about fighting the war and they without exception said the war must be fought vigorously and valiantly until VICTORY.  Later when he addressed members of the Cabinet he mentioned the names of those patriots and related their feelings of solidarity with their Prime Minister.  The climax of the film was towards the end with Winston's speech before the HOUSE which included:

We shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets. we shall fight them in the hills; we shall never surrender.-Winston Churchill.

By this time the once quiet Opposition benches suddenly joined the Government benches and  broke into a stirring clammour of support with hundreds of order papers being thrown into the air with gusto. The House was united for WAR and Churchill had won.]

Today, the feelings of the above patriotic pensioners show how our country after 46 years within Hitler's so-called EU how millions of our once proud patriots are now fellow - travellers of the

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNREPRESENTATIVE - CORRUPT - COSTLY-EU

 

The encompassing tentacles of the

Beast

 are tightening on the remaining captive ,once free peoples of Europe in preparation for a

SOON TO BE A

SUPER-STATE.]

 

 

H.F.1676/1

*

[ BROUGHT FORWARD from Daily Mail-Tuesday,July 8,2008]

 

THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T UNDERSTAND MUSLIM EXTREMISM - WHEN CHRISTIAN TEACHING BECAME A CRIME.

by

Melanie Phillips

[Daily Mail-Tuesday,July 8,2008]

THREE years after the LONDON TUBE and BUS BOMBING, it is alarming beyond measure to record that Britain is even now sleepwalking into

ISLAMISATION

Some people will think this is mere hyperbole. However, That's the problem. Britain still doesn't grasp that it is facing a pincer attack from both terrorism and cultural infiltration and usurpation. .  .

They fail to realise that the attempt to take over our

CULTURE

 is even more deadly to this society than

TERRORISM

they are simply  blind to the ruthless way in which the Islamists are exploiting our chronic muddle of well-meaning toleration and political correctness (backed by the threat of more violence) to put ISLAM on a SPECIAL-INDEED ,UNIQUE -FOOTING WITHIN

BRITAIN.

But Islamism will be repulsed only if Britain once again regains the confidence of its own CULTURE-HERITAGE and TRADITIONS.

AND THESE ARE BASED ON CHRISTIANITY

The Islamists launched their JIHAD against the WEST because the perceived IT WAS WEAK and CONFUSED it would not possess the wherewithal TO DEFEND ITSELF. When it comes to BRITAIN -THEY never SPOKE A TRUER WORD.

 

*          *

 

 

THREE years after the LONDON TUBE and BUS BOMBING, it is alarming beyond measure to record that Britain is even now sleepwalking into

ISLAMISATION

Some people will think this is mere hyperbole. However, That's the problem. Britain still doesn't grasp that it is facing a pincer attack from both terrorism and cultural infiltration and usurpation. .  .

The former is understood, the latter is generally not acknowledged or is even denied, and those who call attention to it are pilloried as either

'ISLAMOPHOBES'

or ALARMISTS who have taken up residence on Planet Paranoia.

Certainly, the police and security services have been foiling plot after plot and are bringing to court a steady stream of Islamist radicals- an improvement without doubt from two years ago. And so, particularly within the British elite, people think that things are broadly under control.

They fail to realise that the attempt to take over our

CULTURE

 is even more deadly to this society than

TERRORISM

they are simply  blind to the ruthless way in which the Islamists are exploiting our chronic muddle of well-meaning toleration and political correctness (backed by the threat of more violence) to put ISLAM on a SPECIAL-INDEED ,UNIQUE -FOOTING WITHIN

BRITAIN.

As a result, the steady

ISLAMISATION of BRITISH PUBLIC LIFE

is either being IGNORED or tacitly encouraged by a political security and judicial establishment that is failing to IDENTIFY the STEALTHY and MIND-BENDING GAME that is being PLAYED.

The official counter -radicalisation programme illustrates the problem.

The Government wants to tackle radicalisation within Britain's Muslim Community

by winning hearts and minds within that community.Its strategy is based on isolating the extremists and encouraging the moderates.

The problem, however, is that it doesn't understand what Muslim extremism is. believing that Islamic terrorism is motivated by an ideology which has 'hijacked' and distorted Islam,

 IT WILL NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THE EXTREMISM WITHIN MAINSTREAM ISLAM ITSELF.

The reason so many older British Muslims are traditionally moderate is that they were brought up in the Asian subcontinent under a tamed form of Islam, deriving from centuries of colonial rule, which glossed over much of the teaching of religion.

The Government believes that Islamic radicalism can be countered by teaching authentic Islam to Muslims.

But since Islamic radicalism is based upon these very authentic religious precepts, this will undoubtedly have the effect of radicalising people who otherwise would never have thought in this way.

The Mosques and Imams National Advisory Board (MINAB) was set up  to put in effect the government's  aim of ensuring

MODERATION in MOSQUES.

This was always unlikely given that members of Islamist groupings were on the steering committee. Although MINAB's chairman, Manazir Ahsan, he is the director of the

ISLAMIC FOUNDATION

which follows the writings of Maulana Maududi -who preached an end to sovereignty and supremacy of unbelievers who should be made to live in a state of subordination to ISLAM.Similarly, Dr Ataullah Siddiqui, the Government's chief adviser on Islamic Studies is a senior member of the

ISLAMIC FOUNDATION.

A report he wrote for the Government last year, Islam at Universities in England, which was publicly welcomed by the prime Minister, urged that among other special privileges for Muslims that should be allowed to teach Islamic subjects in British Universities and that

NON-MUSLIMS SHOULD BE BANNED FROM DOING SO.

In any event, the universities are steadily being

ISLAMISED

with academic objectivity in the teaching of ISLAM and the MIDDLE EAST studies being set aside in FAVOUR of

INDOCTRINATION and PROPAGANDA.

A REPORT by Professor Anthony Glees due to be published in the Autumn will argue that extremist ideas are being spread by

ISLAMIC STUDY CENTRES

linked to

BRITISH UNIVERSITIES

and backed by multi-million-pound donations from

SAUDI ARABIA and MUSLIM ORGANISATIONS.

He says:

'BRITAIN'S UNIVERSITIES  will have to generate TWO NATIONAL CULTURES: One NON-MUSLIM and largely SECULAR,-the other MUSLIM. We will have TWO IDENTITIES and  TWO SETS of ALLEGIANCE and TWO LEGAL and POLITICAL SYSTEMS. This must, by the GOVERNMENT'S OWN LOGIC hugely increase the RISK of TERRORISM.

Even more terrifying, is the increasing

ISLAMISATION of the POLICE.

It has been reported that up to eight police officers and civilian staff working in the

METROPOLITAN POLICE

and other forces are suspected of links to

EXTREMIST GROUPS

including

AL QAEDA,

 with some even  believed to have attended

TERROR TRAINING CAMPS

IN

PAKISTAN and AFGHANISTAN.

One suspected jihadist police officer working in the South East has been allowed to keep his job despite being caught circulating internet images of beheadings and roadside bombs in Iraq.

 

No less disturbing is the fact that the

POLICE

are intentionally bringing

ISLAMISTS

into the FORCE in the utterly MISGUIDED belief (shared by many if the SECURITY SERVICE) that they can help counter Islamist radicalism.

Commander Lambert believed that this will enable the police to understand the way extremists thought before they committed any

ACTS OF TERROR.

But it surely goes without saying that a police officer who is committed

TO OVERTHROW THE WEST

and its replacement by an

ISLAMIC SOCIETY

 poses a security risk of the

FIRST ORDER.

 

For a POLICE COUNTER-TERRORISM specialist to be promoting this situation beggars  belief.

[The man is either a dangerous fool or is an under cover tool for the Islamic Cause. Do we have to wait to see which if any he is rather than get him replaced so that there are NO DOUBTS about his MOTIVES as future lives will be at risk following such a politically correct agenda.]

Deeply alarmed sources have furthermore told me that, in the overriding concern by POLICE FORCES to hire more ETHNIC MINORITY OFFICERS, they have junked VETTING CRITERIA -particularly when it comes to hiring

POLICE COMMUNITY SUPPORT OFFICERS

who after two years can become fully fledged police officers

WITH NO FURTHER VETTING REQUIRED.

The result say the sources, is that the

SECURITY OF POLICE OPERATIONS IS POTENTIALLY COMPROMISED.

Moreover, there have been disturbing examples of the police protecting

ISLAMIC EXTREMISM.

In 2007, the CHANNEL 4 DISPATCHES programme uncovered evidence of incitement to murder homosexuals, the killing of British soldiers and hatred of 'UNBELIEVERS' going on below the official radar in ostensibly respectable

BRITISH MOSQUES.

*

UNDERCOVER MOSQUE

 

But instead of prosecuting such fanatics, the

West Midlands Police

first tried to prosecute the programme makers and then accused them of selective editing and distortion and undermining community cohesion.  - a libel for which the

POLICE

and the

CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE

were subsequently forced to apologise.

 A REPORT by the Centre for Social Cohesion on

HONOUR KILLINGS

and similar violence revealed that several women's groups, particularly in the Midlands and Northern England, say they are reluctant to go to the

POLICE

with women who have run away from home to escape violence because they cannot trust

ASIAN POLICE OFFICERS

not to betray the girls to their abusing families.

In February, Christian evangelists Arthur Cunningham and Joseph Abraham were handing out Bible extracts in Alum Rock, Birmingham. They were stopped by a Muslim police Community Support Officer on preaching in a 'Muslim area', and warned that they might get beaten up if they came back.

 

 

What on earth is happening when in the heart of

ENGLAND

a British support officer , employed by the British State to enforce the

LAW of ENGLAND

aggressively prevents

CHRISTIANS

from preaching the established

FAITH of ENGLAND

on the grounds that this is now a

'hate crime'

 

When the Bishop of Rochester, Dr  Michael Nazir-Ali warned that Britain was developing

MUSLIM NO-GO AREAS

he was denounced as

Islamophobic.

The establishment queued up to say they didn't recognise the Britain he was describing. But British public life is progressively being

ISLAMISED

with Muslim radicals in areas with large concentrations of Muslims increasingly intimidating

NON-MUSLIMS.

After a vicar in East London Canon Michael Ainsworth , was beaten up by three Muslims in his own churchyard in March

it was revealed that there had been many attacks on churches in the area by such youths, who on one occasion shouted:

'This should not be a church-this should be a mosque.

Yet last month, one of the youths in the Ainsworth attack walked free after a judge accepted his claim that the attack was not religiously motivated.

Sharia law is steadily encroaching into British institutions. last week Lord Phillips, the most senior judge in England and Wales, said it could play a role in some parts of the legal system.

This followed comments by the Archbishop of Canterbury who declared that Muslim families should be able to choose between English and Islamic law in marital and family issues.

But the fact is that Britain is already developing a parallel sharia jurisdiction in such matters, with a blind eye being turned to such practices as:

FORCED MARRIAGES

COUSIN MARRIAGES

FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION

and POLYGAMY:

Indeed welfare benefits are now given to the multiple wives of Muslim men.

Meanwhile, the courts still appear to be bending  over backwards to appease Muslim radicalism. last month a judge freed from prison Abu Qatada, the most important Al Qaeda operative in Europe and the lynchpin of numerous European terror attacks, who is being held pending deportation to Jordon to stand trial.

His release on bail - a kind of house arrest -followed a Appeal Court ruling that he could not be  deported to Jordon because any prosecution there might have been obtained as a result of a witness being tortured -a breach of the European Convention of Human Rights.

 

Why do the British authorities appear to go out of their way to thwart efforts to fight and defeat jihadi terror?

While Islamists are being appeased, the Christian Church is being discriminated against.  The Bishop of Rochester said that the decline of Christian Values  was destroying the Britishness and had created a 'moral vacuum' which radical Islam was filling.

 

In reply to this cri de coeur from a civilisation under siege, Hazel Blears, the Communities Secretary maintained it was right that more money and effort was spent on Islam than Christianity because of the threat from extremism and home grown terrorism.

But Islamism will be repulsed only if Britain once again regains the confidence of its own CULTURE-HERITAGE and TRADITIONS.

AND THESE ARE BASED ON CHRISTIANITY...

 

Ms Blears's lamentable comment graphically illustrates the problem. While the ordinary people of Britain are increasingly aghast at the way their country is being transformed to

ISLAMISATION

the political, judicial, security and intellectual elites are busy denying the nature of the danger and making it far, far worse through a combination of

EXTREME ARROGANCE

and

SHEER FUNK.

 

The Islamists launched their JIHAD against the WEST because they perceived IT WAS WEAK and CONFUSED it would not possess the wherewithal TO DEFEND ITSELF. When it comes to BRITAIN -THEY NEVER

SPOKE A TRUER WORD.

 

 

*

 

 

THIS is an abridged version of the forward to a new edition of

LONDONISTAN

by

Melanie Phillips

published by Gibson Square.

[Font Altered- Bolding & Underlining Used -Comments in Brackets]

*

JULY 8-2008

HOME

THE VEIL - THE CROSS - A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

H.F.1662

*
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 4/2

AUGUST 2005

ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY DIFFER

ISLAM honours six main prophets: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus (Isha) and Mohammed, of whom Mohammed is considered the final and greatest of them all.  In the doctrine of Fitrah,  Muslims believe human beings are born good and then corrupted by outside influences, rather than born evil and redeemed  by God, as Christianity teaches.  Mohammed appeared to believe that every child is born Muslim and made Jewish or Christian by his parents. Substitutionary sacrifice has no place in Islam, which is a religion of works and outward show. One's good deeds have to outnumber one's bad deeds in order to gain admittance to the Islamic paradise (Sura 9:102) but Allah "punishes whom he pleases and he forgives whom he pleases" (Sura 5:40).

 Muslim folk law is that an angel sits on a man's right shoulder recording his good deeds and one on his left records his bad deeds.  There is no certainty of forgiveness in Islam, all is on the whim of Allah.  Neither is there any recognition that sin separates us from God, and therefore there is no need of reconciliation. there is the concept of sin, because Muslims know the Black Stone absorbs sins, but that sins can be forgiven by the merits of a divine Saviour is anathema to Allah.

Islam denies the Gospel account of the crucifixion, the very foundation of Christianity.  The Quran blames the Jews for killing the prophets (Sura 4:155) but two verses later has the Jews boasting that they killed 'Christ Jesus the son of Mary' and says "They killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them... of a surety they killed him not" (Sura 4: 157)

From the principle of tawhid , worshipping another, such as Jesus, is the gravest sin anyone can commit against Allah (Sura 4:48)The Holy Trinity is an abomination in Islam, even though the Holy Spirit is mentioned in the Quran as strengthening Jesus (2:87,253;5:110) and revealing the Quran itself (Sura 16:102)  However, it is possible that Mohammed thought Christians worshipped God, Mary as Jesus, as "Say not Trinity" is in a verse conc4erning Mary and Jesus (Sura 4:171). In any event, the Quran denounces as blasphemous any thought that Jesus in particular is equal to Allah (Sura 5:17,71, 75,116).  Islam even teaches that Mohammed, not the Holy Spirit. is the praiseworthy comforter whom  Jesus  would send (Sura 61:6).

The Quran insists Jesus is merely the son of Mary (Sura 2:87;3:45;5:78;33:7) and definitely not the son of Allah (Sura 9:30), although conceived miraculously in Mary's virginity (Sura 19:20), because it is beneath the glory of Allah even to have a son (Sura 4:171;19:34-35;112:3). The Quran has Jesus worshipping (Sura 4:172. and urging the worship )of Allah (Sura 3:525;112;43:63), acknowledging Allah as sole provider (Sura 5:115), puts Allah above Jesus (Sura 3:55), says that Allah taught Jesus the Gospel (Sura 3:48;5:46,110), says Jesus was just a man (Sura 3:59), who did not bring glad tidings' (Sura 5:19 not to be held up as an example (Sura 43:57) and not to be worshipped (Sura 9:31) no more than a messenger (Sura 2:87;5:75) or a prophet (Sura2:136;3:54;33:7;42:13) who prophesised that Mohammed and even urged the disciples, who were Muslims, as it happens, to be helpers of Allah (Sura 3:52;61:14). would come after him (Sura 61:6).

 

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/9

*
DAILY TELEGRAPH

TIM STANLEY

TUESDAY 27 November,2018

 

DAILY TELEGRAPH-TIM STANLEY-VOTERS CAN SEE THIS IS A BARGAIN BASEMENT DEAL


 

Obsessed with migration Mrs May's understanding of Brexit has always been excessively pessimistic

You can tell a lot about a product from the way it is sold

The Government intends to run a general election campaign to get its

WITHDRAWAL DEAL

THROUGH

PARLIAMENT

and its

TWIN WEAPONS are APATHY and FEAR

Vote for this deal and we need never discuss Brexit again! vote it down and we will run out of water and die.

This mix of cynicism and hysteria suggests

WE ARE BEING SOLD A FLAWED DEAL.

by people who never really understood

WHAT BREXIT WAS ABOUT.

Parliamentary critics of the withdrawal plan focus on one fundamental flaw:

THE BACK STOP.

.Once we leave the EU we get two years of status quo in which to negotiate a

NEW TRADE PACT;

IF WE FAIL,

which seems likely,we either extend this expensive transition or we enter a dis agreeable if the

CUSTOMS ARRANGEMENT

a backstop prison wherein the EU sets the rules and we have no influence

WE can only walk away if the EU agrees to it.

The GOVERNMENT insists this is a mere detail, the kind that only nerds and extremists would care about, and that the EUROPEANS will act in good faith anyway.

Well, the last few days have confirmed that we've handed over too much leverage: Spain used a veto threa THEt to force concessionary language on

GIBRALTER

and the FRENCH implied they were coming after our

FISH

the back is thus a legitamate concern and the GOVERNMENT is unwise, in fact rather patronising

to assume

the

VOTERS WON'T CARE ABOUT IT.

Are we

BORED of BREXIT,

 to use Jeremy Hunt's witty acronym?

OH ,MAMA YES. but when people say they want to get BREXIT

"OVER AND DONE WITH"

they don't necessarily at any cost.

its more likely to imply

THAT THEY ARE SICK OF THE ESTABLISHMENT DRAGGING ITS HEELS AND< LIKE CANNY SHOPPERS IN THE MARKET, ARE WARY OF ANY DEAL THAT SMELLS LIKE A FUDGE OR A

SELL OUT.

Mrs May's pledge to "settle" Brexit, to put it past us and move on sounds superficially attractive, but we all know it's not that simple: there are several years of trade negotiations ahead, and if thet fail then, thanks to the

BACKSTOP

, we will be left  trapped in the EU's orbit like a dead moon.

This sounds pretty frightening. Even more frightening than whatever depraved voodoo ceremony Mrs May conducted in the No10 garden to raise

PROJECT FEAR

from its grave.

In the past few weeks we have been told the, if Britain fails to get a deal, we will have power outages, a plummet in the pound, a house price collapse, flight cancellations, a Mars Bar shortage, a medicine crisis, the Army on the streets and, this is the latest, less clean water.

Some of these are based on the real threat of bottlenecks at Dover, but the correct response from any government (ie what we pay them to do) would be to reassure the public with competance and invest for all eventualities.

If a no-deal Brexit does ruin the country, it will be the fault of a PM who failed to prepare for it: where is the dramatic expansion of Dover? Where are the alternative trade routes? The Tory manifesto stated that

NO DEAL WAS BETTER THAN A BAD DEAL

 but now we will get two weeks of being told the complete opposite:

If Parliament does not sign off on the backstop, innocents could die. It's not just the EU that is threatening the British unless they agree to its demands. The Brirtisg Government sounds suspiciously

LIKE IT IS DOING THE SAME.

Mrs May does, however, have one thing to bribe us with:  less immigration. This has been an obsession throughout her career and she obviously sees the referendum result almost exclusively through that prism, which explains why she made that almost her sole red line and was happy to make concessions on so much else that energises LEAVERS. But while some Britons did vote on immigration alone, the essential issue of 2016 was the repatriation of

POLITICAL POWER

-power that could, yes, help control the border but could also revive  our

DEMOCRACY

and

REBUILD OUR ECONOMY.

Mrs May's understanding of politics, even of the voters, at times seems pessimistic, as if she has limited faith in human nature and the capabilities of

FREE NATIONS.

This deal is a triumph of low expectations, delivered at a moment when the sense of possibilities has never been greater.

Her withdrawal deal may yet die the way it has lived, clouded in misunderstanding of what a large  part of the country wants and how democracies function. Mrs May suggests a television debate with Jeremy Corbyn. WHY? We know she hates them: she threw away her majority last year after refusing to go live against Mr Corbyn in a head-to-head.  Mr Corbyn is already committed to voting the deal down, so most of his MPs aren't up for grabs;the audience at home don't get a vote.

 

The proper place for any substantive debate is PARLIAMENT, where the views of around  90 Tories who can't  let the backstop issue go actually matter

This , then, is pure entertainment, just like the Nick Clegg v Nigel Farage debates of 2014-the difference being that these two men genuinely passionately believed in the cause they articulated. As others have noted. Mr Corbyn probably isn't really for Remain and Mrs May isn't truly for Brexit. Neither salesman believes in the product theyre pitching.

 

DAILY TELEGRAPH-TIM STANLEY-VOTERS CAN SEE THIS IS A BARGAIN BASEMENT DEAL

Image result for DAILY TELEGRAPH-TIM STANLEY-VOTERS CAN SEE THIS IS A BARGAIN BASEMENT DEAL

Boris Johnson: My plan for a better Brexit - The Telegraph

 

*  *  *

 

FOLLOW Tim Stanley on Twitter

@timothy stanley; READ MORE at telegraph.co.uk/opinion

 

TUESDAY 27 November,2018

Letters to the Daily Telegraph-BREXIT SPECIAL, - Tuesday 27 November,2018 

 

Theresa May shows contempt for Parliament by wooing the country with a Remainer Brexit'

 

Sir -  I remain a member of the Conservative Party on the off-chance of being allowed to vote for a new leader. If this does not happen soon, I will, with many others, leave the party.

If this appalling deal passes the Commons vote, the future of the United Kingdom is as a vassal state, without control of our laws, judiciary, trade, finance, fishing or agriculture, with Spain taking back Gibraltar, Ireland taking over Northern Ireland and Scotland voting for Independence. We should never have agreed a deal that did not take in future relationships, including trade.

No deal is actually a deal on World Trade Organisation rules, the basis on which we operate 60 per cent (and climbing) of trade with the brest of the world, and on which 90 per cent of all world trade is conducted.

Mrs May must go and be replaced by a Brexiteer. failure to do this will destroy the Conservative Party for ever. It could never come back, but would be replaced by a party which ,unlike Mrs may, espouses

CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES

of low taxation and less government interference

 

M H

Great Waltham, Essex

*  *  *

 

Letters to the Daily Telegraph-BREXIT SPECIAL, - Tuesday,November 27,2018

[The en

[The encompassing tentacles of the

Beast

 are tightening on the remaining captive ,once free peoples of Europe in preparation for a

SOON TO BE A

SUPER-STATE.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS! NAMES ABBREVIATED INTO CAPITALS-FULL DETAILS FROM DAILY TELEGRAPH. ]

 

H.F.1676/9

H.F.1754

*
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 17/1

/Of 28 sections.

AUGUST 2005

ISLAMIC JIHAD

The Islamic Jihad of the 7th to 10th centuries over-ran half of the then Christian World by the sword. Today, many western Muslims are peaceful and law-abiding, and those who are faithful to the Quran and to the Hadith may well stand beside Christians in campaigns against Materialism and immorality.

Equally, they can take the view that the decadent 'Christian' west is regarded as Dar-al-Harb (house of war). pagan and irredeemable. Only jihad, in the latter view, will bring 'peace' by the establishment of a new Khilafah (a Muslim state) worldwide and by the abolition of national boundaries to result in Izhaar ud-Deen (world domination by Islam).

Islamic states are at the forefront of persecution of Christians, a fact well documented by Operation Mobilisation, Barnabas Fund, Christian Solidarity and Frontline Fellowship amongst other Christian groups.  This topic alone would warrant a book about it and there is truly no space here to begin to do the subject the justice it deserves.

Even in non-Muslim countries, Islam shows its aggressive side, and this is putting the bombings in places like New York, Bali, Madrid, London and Israel on one side.  In Nigeria, Muslims are advancing Sha'ria and persecuting Christians, driving them out of Muslim areas by force of arms. In Australia, Muslims used the State of Victoria's Anti-Vilification Law to persecute Paster Daniel Scot when he described the persecution of Christians in Pakistan and described Islamic beliefs.  At the University of Pretoria, in South Africa, Frontline Fellowship Field Director, Timothy Keller, was threatened by a mob of Muslim students demanding that a missions display be taken down.  In the United Kingdom, author Salman Rushdie became the subject of a death sentence for writing his book "The Satanic Verses" and the arts and media worlds are terrified of offending Muslims.  And with good reason - Dutch film-maker Theo van Gogh was murdered because he released a film criticising Islam and the oppression of women in arranged marriages.  His murderer, Mohammed Bouyeri, is unrepentant.

Believers are held in Islam by fear, making the Quranic promise that there is no compulsion empty. Mohammed said 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.' (Bukhari: Volume 4, book 52, Number 260, Narrated Ikrima.)

Apostasy is punishable by death today in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Yemen, Iran, Sudan, Pakistan and Mauritania.  Of point to us in evangelism is that the penalty for a Muslim converting to Christianity in Britain is still theoretically death.  Even if a convert's Muslims neighbours stop short of killing him, Muslim converts in Britain suffer severe persecution.  The Barnabas Fund estimate that some 3,000 Christian converts from Islam are in danger in the UK.  They include Nissar Hussain and his family from Bradford; his car was burnt out, he has endured bricks thrown through his windows, threats to burn his house down and much else.

 

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/14/1

*

 BROKEN PROMISES

The decision of the DAILY MAIL to no longer support

BREXIT

is analogous to a newspaper that supported

THE END OF SLAVERY

(and what are we in reality but slaves withi HITLER'S

so-called

 EUROPEAN UNION)

to no longer do so because there was a

CHANGE OF EDITOR

was not in keeping with ONE of THE watchfull responsibilities of

the

FOURTH ESTATE

of our

CONSTITUTION.

THE ISSUE IN BOTH INSTANCES IS ABOUT

FREEDOM

OF

PERSON and COUNTRY

 

What could be more important in the lives of a people with

MAGNA CARTA

PETITION OF RIGHT

HABEAS CORPU

TRIAL BY JURY...

IN ITS LONG ISLAND HISTORY IN THEIR ONCE

FREE INDEPENDENT  NATION STATE

OF

 
 ENGLAND

 IN OUR ISLAND HOME?

THANKFULLY , AT LEAST THE DAILY MAIL IS PERMITTING A SMALL BAND OF PATRIOTS TO CARRY ON THEIR ONCE CAMPAIGN  SUCH AS RICHARD LITTLEJOHN and others  who are UPHOLDING alone

OTHERS HAVE BROKEN

THE TRADITION OF A FREE PRESS AND AN IMPLIED PROMISE.

DECEMBER  8,2018

hH.F.1770

*
LITTLEJOHN

 

 As Marx said, history does have the ... A Very British Coup revolved around a conspiracy by the military, the media, big business and M15...

 

 

So this is what a very British coup looks like.

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

SOME of you will recall the novel

A Very British Coup,

subsequently made into an award-winning television series on Channel 4.

It was written by Labour MP Chris Mullin, published in 1982, and revolved around a conspiracy by the

MILITARY-THE MEDIA-BIG BUSINESS-M15

to bring down a Left-wing government.

At the time, the plot was entirely credible, since Britain was riven by strikes and revolution was in the air. I read the book as a young labour and industrial correspondent, and it made sense to me.

 The Bennites were in the ascendancy, Margaret Thatcher was horribly unpopular and it looked as if the wizened Hampstead Leftie Michael Foot-Worzel Gummidge, as Private Eye dubbed him-would be our next Prime Minister.

Mullin's assumptions were based  on hard fact. In the Seventies there had been well-founded reports about the Establishment plot to depose Labour's Harold Wilson.

In some quarters, there were even rumblings of a military coup.

A couple of years ago, when the un reconstructed Bennite Jeremy Corbyn became leader, Mullen talked about writing a sequel. He imagined the Funny  People orchestrating a putsch to thwart a democratically elected Corbyn government.

Trouble is, history has a habit of not working out as you expect. Although, as Marx said, history does have the capacity to repeat itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. That's where we are right now. Except tragedy and farce are running in tandem.

WE are in the middle of

A VERY BRITISH COUP

but not as Mullin predicted. What we're seeing is an elaborate, well-financed and coordinated plot to overturn as extreme Left-wing Prime Minister

BUT

the democratically expressed will of the British people.

It's being mounted by the Government of the day, aided and abetted by Big Business and the Civil Service.

[A repeat of 1970's-again by a supposed Conservative Government.]

 

THIS is A  Very BRITISH Coup, only written by Lewis Carroll not Chris Mullin. In our new Looking Glass World, words mean-as Humpty Dumpty declared-whatever they want them to mean.

Thus the dwindling band of MPs sticking uo for the

17.4 MILLION who voted

LEAVE

are condemned as plotters and rebels

Those, including Theresa May, who are doing everything in their power to

PREVENT

BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU

and becoming once again a

PROUD SOVEREIGN NATION

are hailed absurdedly as true patriots

As I've said often enough, just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

About the only thing upon which I've ever agreed with Ken Livingstone - apart from cheap Tube fares - was when he wrote a book called

If Voting Changed Anything They'd Abolish it. The Establishment seems hell-bent on proving him

Right over Brexit .

[The EDP has over decades seen much evidence of this very fact and though continually bringing evidence to the surface nobody appears to be interested whether it is lack of Bobbies -on-the beat - Health Service in crisis-Pot-holes-closed Police Stations...Britons on worst State Pensions in the Europe-even Portugal is marginally more. And a bloated -wasteful and grotesque so-called FOREIGN AID which even some regimes as recipients have requested to be stopped .

I told  you the day after the referendum that the fix was already in . Now they're on the final furlongs

We're being informed, in no uncertain fashion that

OUR VOTES ARE WORTHLESS

that they don't count.

WE'RE TOO IGNORANT, TOO UNEDUCATED, TOO RACIST

To be taken seriously.

Politicians who try to square the circle are vilified.

One minute Dominic Raab, who attempted to make a go of being Brexit Secretary, is a principled pragmatic operator of the highest praise.

The next, when he is forced to resign because Mother Theresa has deliberately undermined his position and then lied about it, he's dismissed as a disloyal traitor. And If I hear anyone else demanding a second

'People's Vote'

I'll scream.

All they want to do is reverse the referendum result or give us three options so they can split the

LEAVE VOTE

To be honest, I can't take much more of this patronising guff. The Beeb's idea of discerning commentators these days seems to extend no further than 'Baroness' Shameless Chuckabutty, Potty Toynbee and Mad Alastair Campbell, the author of the dodgy dossier which took into an

ILLEGAL WAR IN IRAQ.

 

As I believe I may have observed before. Campbell is the only bloke I know with a certificate to prove he's sane.

And don't get me started on the CBI which throughout my career has been wrong about everything from joining the euro to the Thatcher reforms. The CBI speaks only for monopolistic, multinational megacorps, not the small-to-medium businesses which are the backbone of our economy and always get the rough end  of the pineapple from Brussels - even though they don't sell so much as a brass washer outside British borders.

Twenty-five-odd years ago, covering a CBI conference in Glasgow, I watched the chairman of Dunlop taking the stage wearing a kilt and waving a Union Jack, as part of an I'm Backing Britain campaign. The following week he sold the company to the Japanese.

These are the same people bnow claiming to have British interests at the heart of their determination to

KEEP US SHACKLED TO THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC EU

The final straw came when the arrogant Amber Rudd was restored to Government over the weekend and immediately demanded loyalty and unity around Mrs May's 'deal'.  Her commitment to 'loyalty' hasn't stopped her trashing Cabinet colleagues in the past.

This fanatically pro-EU women who oozes an inter-galactic sense of  entitledment from every pore, is the sister of the PR spiv Roland Rudd, who is paid a small fortune to run

PROJECT FEAR

on behalf of his well-healed clients.

Just imagine if one of Boris's siblings was cashing in on

BREXIT.

The calls from Remainers for the police to investigate would be deafening. By Sunday, I'd had enough and reached the point where I came over all Tom Robinson.

I've given up reading the papers,

I've given up watching TV.

 

LOOK, I repeat, for those of you who missed it the first time round, even tungsten-tipped hard Brexiteers like me accept there will have to be some concessions if we're going to escape from the EU straitjacket.

And I do think the prospect of a Marxist Corbynista government is too horrible to contemplate.

But I also believe its 1992 all over again. This is Mother Theresa's

BLACK WEDNESDAY

MOMENT

WHATEVER HAPPENS NEXT

THE TORIES

ARE SHOT TO PIECES.

All trust and confidence in them has drained away and we're looking at a Labour government by default whenever the next election is called

Most of the 17.4 million who believe they have been betrayed will simply stay at home, or drift back to Labour. Democracy will be the ultimate casualty of this shabby debacle.

The pathetic defeatest dog's breakfast of an agreement

 which Mother Theresa is trying to force down our throats isn't worthy of the description 'deal'.

It is a monstrous capitulation and will be etched on her political gravestone, even if she does manage to get it, or a version thereof, through Parliament.

Where do we go from here?

I haven't a clue.

But at least we now know exactly

what a

Very British Coup

LOOKS LIKE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 20,2018

H.F.1747

 *

 
DAILY EXPRESS

CHARLOTTE DAVIS

 

Brexit news: Furious Brits are 'fed up' of Brexit and want people to stop moaning and "just get out" of the European Union... - Daily Express

by CHARLOTTE DAVIS

November 27,2018

Residents in Leeds, an area which voted to Remain by one of the closet

margins in the country, have said they are "fed up" with MPs in Parliament bickering over Brexit deal proposed by the Prime Minister Theresa May. One furious Leeds resident had a clear message for the Prime Minister. He told BBC news

"WE VOTED, GET OUT..

All the people that are whinging about it

GET OVER IT.

 

Brexit news: Furious Brits are 'fed up' of Brexit and want people to stop moaning and "just get out" of the European Union... - Daily Express

by CHARLOTTE DAVIS

November 27,2018

[IT IS LONG OVERDUE OUR TWO FINGER -REVERSED WAR-TIME CHURCHILLIAN MESSAGE TO BERLIN AND CO- CONSPIRATOR - PARIS

 HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION - POST HASTE.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

 

H.F.1756

*
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 17/1

AUGUST 2005

THE 'COVENANT OF SECURITY'

The Islamic concept of a 'Covenant of Security' means two things. Firstly, unbelievers who pay the Jizyah are entitled to the provision of security from the Khilafah, and secondly, a non-Islamic nation which provides shelter to Muslims is not regarded as Dar-al-Harb. It is the second meaning which is relevant to Britain today.

In practice, as long as Britain sheltered Islamic terrorists planning strikes against their own governments, and did not make war against islamic lands, Britian was safe from attack.  The turning of London into Londonistan, a haven for foreign jihadists, made Britain, in a perverse kind of way, a safer place.

Chief among advocates of the 'Covenant of Security' was Skeikh Omar Bakri, leader of al-Muhajiroun. The head of its Luton branch, Sayful Islam, said in April 2004 that he supported Osama Bin Laden "100 per cent" in the quest to achieve

"the worldwide domination of Islam"

but he would not engage in terror attacks in Britain

"as long as they allow us Muslims to live here in peace."

All that changed as events unfolded in 2004 as a result of 9/11.

The British Government arrested certain foreign nationals on suspicion of inciting terrorism, and, unable for human rights reasons to deport them, kept them interned without trial.

The second factor was Britain's active support in the American invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

In January 2005 Bakri determined that the covenant of security had ended and "the whole of Britain had become Dar-al-Harb."

British Muslims were obliged "to join the global Islamic camp against the global crusader camp" the latter of which included Britain. Six months later, the bombing campaign in London began.

Other British jihadists took a different line. Hassan Butt left al Muhajiroun because he disagreed that British-born Muslims were bound by the same covenant of security felt by foreigners, such as Bakri himself.  In an interview, Butt said British-born Muslim youth have no allegiance to this country: "Islamically, I agree that someone who runs from the Middle East-where people like me are persecuted-and says, 'Britain, I want you to protect me' has entered a covenant of security. They  say, 'look protect my life and as a result I won't do any harm to you.' That  I agree with 100 per cent, but most of our people, especially the youth are British citizens... They did not ask to be born here; neither did they ask to be protected by Britain....They  have no covenant. As far as I'm concerned, the Islamic hukum (order) that I follow, says that a person has no covenant whatsoever with the country in which they are born." (Prospect Magazine August 2005)

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/14/1

*
[A FAILED PROMISE FROM APRIL 2017]

*

 

[PROCLAMATION CONFIRMED

FOR

 ENGLAND'S

 FREEDOM AND FUTURE.

 

COUNTDOWN TO SUCCESS

ON

JUNE 8-2017

WE REMIND REMOANERS-PARTICULARLY MPs THAT BREXIT IS ABOUT FREEDOM-CULTURE AND COUNTRY-AND PROSPERITY WITHIN A WIDER WORLD OF OPPORTUNITY

NOT ABOUT IF YOU COULD LOSE YOUR JOB OR BUSINESS OR EU HANDOUTS-

PAID FOR BY ENGLISH TAXPAYERS MAINLY IN THE SOUTH EAST OF ENGLAND.]

*

     

    Tory manifesto will guarantee end

     

     

    of

     

     

    free movement

     

     

    ++

     

     

     UK to leave Single Market

     

     

     ++

     

     

     No more

     

     

    meddling by Euro Judges

     

     

     

    by

     

     

     

    Jason Groves-Political Editor | Daily

     

     

    Mail Online

     

     

    THERESA'S CAST-IRON

    BREXIT

    PLEDGES

     

     

     

     

     

    THERESA MAY will place a triple lock on Brexit  in the Tory manifesto to STOP OBSTRUCTION

     

     

    by

     

     

    DIEHARD REMAINERS

     

    Tory sources say she is set to include specific pledges to overcome opposition within her party and in the Lords.

    The manifesto is expected to commit the Conservatives to ending

     

    EU FREE MOVEMENT

     

    and pulling out of both the

    SINGLE MARKET

    and

    EUROPEAN COURT of JUSTICE

    Senior Tories see these three measures as essential in delivering last year's referendum result

    [Mrs May's Pledge that

    BREXIT means BREXIT

     is MET!]

     

    Full article

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    April 20-2017

     

    IN DECEMBER 2018 WE SEE THAT 

     

     

    [THERESA MAY'S PROMISES HAVE BEEN FOUND TO

     

     

    BE

     

     

    FALSE!]

     

    DECEMBER 2018

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

 

H.F.1169/1

*
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 2

AUGUST 2005

THE FOUNDING OF ISLAM

 

Islam as founded in the seventh century AD by Abdul-Kasim Mohammed ibn Abd Allah. Mohammed was born in  Mecca in Arabia in 570 AD and was a member of the Quraish tribe, who worshipped the moon-god, 'Al-ilah', and a variety of other pagan deities. Orphaned at an early age, he was brought up by his uncle. Abu Talib.  He married his first wife, Khadija, when he was 25 and she 40. She was the widow of a rich merchant in whose caravan Mohammed was travelling and the pair became devoted to each other. With his wealth and travelling lifestyle, he acquired some knowledge of both Judaism and Christianity.  In 610 AD, Mohammed claimed to have had a vision of what he believed was the angel Gabriel. Mohammed was an intelligent man but he could not read or write, so he had scribes write down that and further visions.  In time these became the Quran, in which was developed the monotheistic concept of Allah as an omnipotent creator who alone was to be worshipped.

Not surprisingly, Mohammed's insistence, in the words of the Quran that "No god is there but the one Allah" (Sura 38:65), set he and his small band of followers against the majority in Mecca.  The pagan Ka'aba shrine in Mecca was an important focus for pilgrimage. the tourism industry was important even then and vital to Mecca.  The incident of the 'Satanic Verses' which established the principle of 'Naskh' (qv) made life even more uncomfortable for Mohammed.

In 620 AD, following the sudden deaths of both his first wife and his uncle and protector, Mohammed found himself and the Hashemite clan of which he was a member coming under a degree of persecution in Mecca.  He quickly married another widow, Sawda, and shortly afterwards married a girl named Ayesha. her father, Abu Bakr, was devoted to Mohammed and would emerge as first caliph,(successor to Mohammed). Mohammed further married Hafsah, daughter of Umar, second caliph, Mohammed's daughter or step-daughter Umm Kulthum married third caliph Uthman, and Mohammed's certain daughter Fatima by his first wife Khadijah was married to his cousin Ali, the fourth caliph.  (Shi-ite Muslims believe only Ali was a true caliph.) Mohammed went on to marry another twelve women, but none bore him surviving children. His three sons, two born by Kadijah and one of his concubine Mary the Copt, all died in infancy.

 

 

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/2

 

*

 

 

[A WARNING THAT UNLESS YOU SUPPORT THE PAST-YOU WILL HAVE NO FUTURE.]

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN

By

Michael Nazir Ali

 

BISHOP OF ROCHESTER

DECEMBER 24-2006

A leading CHURCHMAN tells how the CAMPAIGN to abolish the CELEBRATION of CHRISTMAS threatens BRITAIN'S very IDENTITY as a NATION.

 

EVERY DAY THIS MONTH-Cathedrals-Churches-and School Halls have been packed with people wanting to hear the CHRISTMAS STORY and to sing CAROLS.

 

Yet there are  some  in WHITEHALL and TOWN HALL, in SCHOOL and SHOP and OFFICE, who want to write CHRIST out of CHRISTMAS -ALTOGETHER.

I passed a charity shop window the other day which had the popular carol

The Holly and The Ivy

pasted up but all the verses about Christ and salvation he brings had been carefully and precisely REMOVED.

 

In the run up to Christmas, we have been provided with  amounting evidence that CHRISTMAS is being MARGINALISED.

Reputable opinion polls have discovered that a significant number of schools are reluctant to stage NATIVITY PLAYS or to sing CAROLS, and employers are shying away from CHRISTMAS decorations at the workplace

 

The Chancellor himself. had to plead with a Government-funded network of playgroups to allow the children to have CHRISTIAN parties.

Some have seen in this a conspiracy by hard-nosed secularists who want to erase every remaining acknowledgement of religion from the public sphere. Others have thought it was just well-meaning officials wanting to be fair to all.

Let us be clear that this has nothing to do with people of other faiths. One of our local radio stations tried to find a single person opposed to the

CELEBRATION OF CHRISTMAS.

-and failed to do so.

On the whole, people of other faiths are keen that Christians should celebrate Christmas.

We know also, from the sheer numbers of people coming through our church doors, that this has NOTHING to do with APATHY.

So, are we back to the conspiracy theory then?

It is certainly true that there is a relatively small number of

ORGANISATIONS

PUBLICATIONS

PEOPLE

-who would like to see CHRISTMAS made a private CELEBRATION.

ALTHOUGH, in absolute terms, their numbers are small, they have had a disproportionate influence on legislation and on the life of the nation in the past 40 years or so.

That have created assumptions about

MULTICULTURALISM

and

MULTICULTURALISM

and

MULTIFAITHISM

 

that lie behind, for example, the so-called

DIVERSITY LEGISLATION

 

This could mean, among other things, that employers and schools are reluctant to have public

CELEBRATIONS OF CHRISTMAS.

 

-because it could be seen as discriminatory against non-Christians and leave THEM OPEN TO LITIGATION.

It is often said that the Health and Safety people are the real government of the day and it appears their meticulous concern for our well-being has also had a dampening effect on the

CELEBRATION OF CHRISTMAS.

-through thoughtless BUREAUCRACY and the desire to be

 POLITICALLY CORRECT.

 

Christians celebrate Christmas because they want to give thanks for the coming of Jesus Christ, the greatest gift ever received by Humanity.

 

Down the ages , hundreds of millions have been inspired by his life , moved by his suffering, death and resurrection, and guided by his comparable teachings. He marks a turning point in HISTORY (still remembered-albeit politically incorrectly -when we date events BC or AD.)

Without the guiding influence of the Christian faith it is impossible to think of Britain as a Nation.  We owe our ideas of

MONARCHY and the RULE OF LAW to IT,

not to mention our commitment to

JUSTICE

EQUALITY

DIGNITY

LIBERTY

BRITISH INSTITUTIONS

VALUES

CUSTOMS

-have all developed under the CHRISTIAN INFLUENCE.

 

The long tradition of welfare provision and the struggles against

SLAVERY and POVERTY

-would be unimaginable without it.

It is true, of course, that Christian

FAITH and VALUES

-do not simply endorse all that is going on in our culture. In fact , they can and do serve as a critique to

INJUSTICE

THE FAILURE OF COMPASSION

-and the tendency to be

SELFISH and GREEDY.

 

The Enlightenment, when it came in the 17th and 18th Centuries, certainly sought to prevent conflict being waged in the name of

RELIGION.

(though as usual, political and economic factors were more important)

HOWEVER, the Enlightenment's most important themes, such as the inherent dignity of each human being the fundamental equality of all, the primacy of conscience and the importance of an ordered society were all derived from

CHRISTIAN IDEAS.

 

If all this is true, who are the people who wish to consign Christianity to the privacy of the

HOME and the CHURCH?

Could it be those who are committed to weakening the

TRADITIONAL STRUCTURES

-such as

MARRIAGE and the FAMILY

-which hold society TOGETHER?

 

What about those who call for ABORTION more or less on demand and, similarly, EUTHANASIA?

Or is it those who have forgotten that Adam Smith's economic vision was undergirded by the moral vision of

COMPASSSION and ALTRUISM?

however they may be, we are treading on treacherous ground. Along with the rest of the world, Britain is again faced with the challenge of a

TOTALITARIAN IDEOLOGY

 

-one which also -

rightly or wrongly-claims to be rooted in a RELIGIOUS TRADITION.

If BRITAIN is to DEFEND its VALUES successfully, it must rediscover the

CHRISTIAN FAITH

-in which these VALUES are ultimately ROOTED.

So what has all this to do with CHRISTMAS?

EVERYTHING ACTUALLY.

 

The marginalising of Christmas is hugely symbolic of what has happened in the Nation's LIFE.

 

As Matthew Arnold saw so vividly in his famous poem Dover Beach, the

'SEA of FAITH'

-has been retreating for a long time, leaving darkness and barbarism behind.

If the Christian Faith is not to

INFORM

INSPIRE

PERSUADE

(never coerce) us, what will?

WILL IT BE ISLAMISM

or perhaps, another

IDEOLOGY STILL TO BE BORN?

 

WE HAVE A STARK CHOICE BEFORE US BETWEEN CHRISTMAS AND AN EMPTY WINTER FESTIVAL

-that fails even to evoke the PAGANISM it aspires TO.

GOD knows how often we have let down the vision of JESUS, neglecting the VIRTUES of

MODERATION

GENEROSITY

LOVE

and

SACRIFICE that springs from CHRISTIAN

FAITH

HOPE

and

LOVE

We know that the VALUES of INHERENT DIGNITY

EQUALITY

LIBERTY

and of safety arise out of the JUDAEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION

and we ignore this

TRADITION

at our physical, social and international peril.

 

There is little time to lose if Britain is to survive. I do not make a plea for a return of

'Victorian Values'

 

I want us to affirm the connection between CHRISTMAS in the PUBLIC square and these enduring truths that lie at the

HEART of a NATION'S LIFE.

 

The CHURCHES important work TO DO if this CONNECTION IS TO BE MADE.

They cannot, at this time, succumb to the SPIRIT of the AGE. Nor should they be SILENT when it is TIME TO SPEAK OUT

This is definitely NOT the

ALTERNATIVE

CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

It is the AUTHENTIC

CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

It is a CALL to enter more deeply into OUR TRADITION so that we can better understand the SOURCE and GROUND of ALL WE HOLD DEAR.

I PRAY FERVENTLY THAT IT IS

NOT TOO LATE.!

*          *          *

[Font altered-Bolding &underlining used -Comments in brackets are ours!]

DECEMBER 24-2006

*

 H.F.1722

 

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

“Jesus Christ to marry Asian Goddess” as East-West secret societies agree to save planet

For the first time in history, Eastern and Western secret societies have agreed to work together for the benefit of the planet, secret society sources say.  As one Western secret society source put it, “Jesus Christ is going to get married to Guan Yin [the Buddhist Goddess of Mercy].”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guanyin

The result is that unlimited funding is going to be made available to fund projects to help the living creatures of this planet, human and otherwise, the sources say.  However, since we are entering historically uncharted waters, it will probably take a few months before the actual work can begin, the sources say.

At present there are several competing plans being presented at the highest levels of world power.  The Vatican and the P2 Freemasons want to make funds available to existing nation-states through selected individuals, P2 sources say.  The Chinese have already started their work through their One Belt One Road program.  The white hats in the Pentagon and the military-industrial complex are promoting their NESARA and GESARA Global Currency Reset ideas.

Enough money is theoretically available for all of these projects to go ahead simultaneously.  However, there is agreement that any release of funds will have to be firmly connected to reality and real-world projects if we are to avoid hyperinflation or asset inflation, as we have under the current system.

The White Dragon Society has also put forward proposals that have been given initial approval by both Eastern and Western secret societies, WDS sources say.  The WDS proposal is as follows:  The creation of at least two competing future planning agencies.  Each would have a governing board of seven people selected from seven regions:  China, East Asia excluding China, Europe including Russia, the Muslim world, India, Africa, and the Americas.  All decisions would be reached by majority vote and vetoes would be limited to individual regions.

Proposed headquarter locations for the Western agency are Winnipeg, Canada, the exact geographical center of North America;  and Buenos Aires, Argentina (the Pope’s home).  For Asia, Nara, Japan, Laos, and Singapore are being proposed.  Negotiations are ongoing and no final decision has been reached.

However, it has been confirmed that over $200 billion in gold-backed funds will be available to start the agency as soon as the appropriate legal documents are prepared, BIS sources say.

While this is all good news, fighting to subdue the remaining Khazarian satanists continues in the U.S., the EU, Israel, and Japan.

In the U.S., according to Pentagon sources, the Democratic Party fell for a trap when …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Greetings and a hug from Mexico, Benjamin

This letter from a whistleblower in Mexico claims the outgoing president stole a lot of gold and dollars from the Mexican people.

Benjamin, aquí en México han sucedido varias cosas en el sexenio que gobernó Felipe de Jesus Calderón Hinojosa (expresidente) y el actual presidente Enrique Peńa Nieto, Calderón compro 100 toneladas de oro y Enrique Peńa Nieto compro 20 toneladas de oro, de las cuales no se sabe donde están, ya pregunte al actual presidente Enrique Peńa Nieto via pagina web de la presidencia y no me contesta.

Además el expresidente Calderón también entregó 9 mil millones de dólares en el ańo 2011 y en el ańo 2012 meses antes de terminar su mandato entrego 10 mil millones de dólares.

El motivo de este mensaje es que la sociedad del dragon blanco llame a estos seńores y les pida cuentas en nombre de el pueblo de Mexico, esta es mi petición.

Muchas gracias.

Te envio un fuerte abrazo desde la ciudad de México.

Que nuestro creador te envíe grandes y buenas cosas hoy y siempre para que logres todos tus propósitos.

—RD


English translation:

Benjamin,

Here in Mexico several things have happened in the six years that Felipe de Jesus Calderon Hinojosa (former President) and the current President Enrique Peńa Nieto ruled.  Calderon bought 100 tons of gold and Enrique Peńa Nieto bought 20 tons of gold, of which it is not known where they are, and I asked the current President Enrique Peńa Nieto via the Presidency website and he does not answer me.

In addition, the former President Calderon also gave $9 billion in 2011 and in the year 2012 months before completing its mandate delivered $10 billion.  The reason for this message is to ask the White Dragon Society to call upon these gentlemen and ask them to account for this on behalf of the Mexican people.  This is my request.

Thank you very much.  I am sending a big hug from the city of Mexico and ask that our Creator sends you great and good things today and forever so you can achieve all your goals.

Global Currency Reset

Dear Benjamin,

For the past few weeks your sources keep mentioning a Global Currency Reset that’s supposed to happen when exactly?  And what is it all about?  Appreciation of precious metals?  And what’s going on with the price of these?  Aren’t they still rigged?

There is also a website called “usdebtclock.org” that recently caught my attention.  Are the prices of gold and silver mentioned there true or what?  I invested long ago in gold and silver since you mentioned it as a good strategy and I am getting a bit distressed two years later.

Thank you for your time and effort and excuse any temper of mine.  Nothing personal with you.  Keep up the good work.

—CD


Hello CD,

First of all, I do not know exactly when or if the global currency reset will take place.  It is highly placed Pentagon sources who tell me it is imminent.

As far as gold and silver are concerned, they have a track record going back thousands of years of protecting wealth.  The same amount of silver can buy the same amount of grain now that it could 4,000 years ago in ancient Sumeria.  The same amount of gold could get you a tailor-made suit in ancient Rome, 19th Century England, and present day New York.

I am not a financial adviser, but it sure looks like the stock bubble really is finally bursting now, so my advice is that if you seek to preserve your wealth, keep your precious metals or buy real estate that can earn enough rent to pay any loan and still turn a profit.

[THE MIND OF MANKIND IS IT'S WEAPON OF PEACE.]

 

[COMMENT IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1748

*

 

Theresa May should abandon

Brexit trade deal talks

 if Brussels remains stubborn, say top Leave campaigners including Lord Lawson

  • Theresa May has been encouraged to walk away if EU won't discuss a trade deal 
  • Leading Leavers including former Tory Chancellor Lord Lawson made the calls
  • They say delaying trade talks is causing ‘a highly damaging level of uncertainty’  

Brexiteers including former Tory Chancellor Lord Lawson  (pictured) urged Mrs May to abandon the negotiations if there is no progress towards a deal

Theresa May should walk away from Brexit talks tomorrow if EU leaders refuse to discuss trade with Britain, leading Leave campaigners say today.

Brexiteers including former Tory Chancellor Lord Lawson urged Mrs May to abandon the negotiations if there is no progress towards a deal.

In a letter released today they say the EU’s deliberate policy of delaying trade talks is causing ‘a highly damaging level of uncertainty’ for British business.

As such, the Prime Minister must issue an ultimatum at this week’s meeting of the European Council, which begins today.

If talks do not move on to trade, Mrs May should announce that Britain will move to World Trade Organisation (WTO) terms after March 30, 2019, and begin intense preparations for the ‘no deal’ Brexit.

The letter, organised by the Leave Means Leave pressure group, is signed by senior figures from politics, business, law and the military.

As well as Lord Lawson, who chaired the official Leave campaign, signatories include former Tory cabinet ministers Peter Lilley, John Redwood and Owen Paterson, Labour MPs Kate Hoey and Graham Stringer, economist Professor Patrick Minford, and JD Wetherspoon chairman Tim Martin. 

It came as former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith called on Mrs May to make preparations for leaving without a deal.

It came as former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith called on Mrs May to make preparations for leaving without a deal

He urged her to order Government departments to ‘make all arrangements’ for moving to WTO terms.

In an article for the Brexit Central news website, Mr Duncan Smith said the EU was dragging its feet to try and extract as much money as it can out of the UK. 

And in a clear swipe at Chancellor Philip Hammond, he said Britain’s planning for a ‘no deal’ scenario must include spending money.

The letter to Mrs May, published as she travels to Brussels, says: ‘Following your ...speech in Florence, it has become increasingly clear that the European Commission is deliberately deferring discussions on the UK’s future trading relationship with the EU27 post-Brexit. 

This is causing a highly damaging level of uncertainty for businesses.

‘The EU is taking this approach because they do not believe that the UK would be prepared to go to WTO rules for our trading relationship with them.

The letter, organised by the Leave Means Leave pressure group, is signed by senior figures from politics, business, law and the military

‘If at the European Council this week, the EU continues to refuse to discuss the future framework for a trade relationship, we should formally declare that we are assuming that we will be subject to WTO rules from March 30, 2019.’

Such an announcement would provide business with ‘absolute certainty about the future’ – and if the EU then wanted to return to the negotiating table, that would be a ‘bonus’. 

The letter adds that the public would welcome ‘such decisive action’ and ministers would be better focusing their efforts on ‘minimising disruptions’ from Brexit and seizing the economic opportunities.

 
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4994864/Theresa-urged-abandon-Brexit-trade-deal-talks.html#ixzz4w8OVhIJj
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

OCTOBER 19-2017

*  *  *

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1353 [BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU FOR GERMANY TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE AND TO ENTRAP ENGLAND TO PAY ITS MAJOR SHARE FOR THE

SATANIC BEAST'

VERY SURVIVAL, AS REVENGE FOR ENGLAND...WINNING TWO WORLD WARS AGAINST THE HUN!

H.F.1353

Sajid Javid slams grooming gang as 'sick Asian ..by Daniel Martin -policy Editor. - Daily Mail

 

 

DECEMBER 27,2018

 

SAJID Javid has vigorously defended highlighting the ethnicity of paedophile grooming gangs - arguing that ignoring

[ingrained POLITICAL CORRECTNESS]

it would give a boost to extremists.

The Home Secretary said he  took the Rochdale grooming scandal personally because it involved his home town and men who were from a Pakistani background like him.

 He defended the Government's decision to strip some members of the gang of their British  citizenship, insisting his job was to keep the British public safe even if it meant offenders being sent  to a country where they may face fewer checks on their actions. Mr Javid insisted he was right to send a controversial tweet in October condemning 'sick Asian paedophiles' convicted for grooming in the Huddersfield area.

The  Home Secretary was born in Rochdale, one of a series of towns where members of the grooming gangs target young girls.

Asked if that meant he took it more personally, Mr Javid told the BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'Sometimes I have, yes. Especially with reference to Rochdale, because it is my own town. I still go there now and again, because I have family there that I care about

When I heard about -and there has been more than one case-grooming gangs were almost every individual involved  is of Pakistan heritage -I can't help noting the fact that Rochdale is a town that means something to me and I am also of Pakistan heritage.

He added: I think it would be true of any that if they heard about something-in this case bad-connected to a town that was something special to them, naturally that would be a thought in their mind.

[While the politically correct indoctrinated Local Authority - Police and Care - looked the other way .]

'But in terms of a response, what matters is first of all, the law enforcement response which rightly is completely independent of government ministers.'

Mr Javid also defended  Government action to strip offenders of their British citizenship

 [This is precisely what should happen to MUSLIM EXTREMISTS who take up arms against our country.]

Asked if he was concerned about the possible lack of control over paedophiles if they returned to Pakistan, Mr Javid insisted: 'My job is to protect the British public and do what I think is right to

PROTECT THE BRITISH PUBLIC.

In August, the Court of Appeal upheld a decision to strip three members of a Rochdale grooming gang of their British Citizenship.

Abdul Aziz, Adil Khan and Qari Abdul Rauf were among nine men jailed in May 2012 after found guilty of grooming and sexually exploiting girls as young as 13.

Mr Javid also stressed the need to acknowledge the background of the grooming gangs.

Responding to criticism of his Twitter message about the Huddersfield gang, he told Today:

'When it comes to gang-based child exploitation it is self-evident to anyone who cares to look that if you look at all the recent high profile cases there is a high proportion of men that are of Pakistan heritage.'

'For me to rule something out just because it would be considered sensitive would be wrong.'

Mr Javid said.'If I had ignored it, or been seen to ignore it, that is exactly what i think extremists would like to see in this country.'

[Were sure that the majority  the SANE and unpolitically -correct population in BRITAIN agrees with him.

[TELL TODAY ITS TOMORROW.]

Sajid Javid slams grooming gang as 'sick Asian ..by Daniel Martin -policy Editor. - Daily Mail

 

 

DECEMBER 27,2018

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1768

 

Letters to the Daily Telegraph-BREXIT SPECIAL, - Tuesday 27 November,2018 

 

Theresa May shows contempt for Parliament by wooing the country with a Remainer Brexit'

[No 1]

 

Sir - The contempt shown by Theresa May for both Parliament and Cabinet is now laid bare.

Throughout the Brexit process, only her unelected advisers and civil servants have been allowed to conduct the negotiations with elected colleagues firmly excluded.

The Prime Minister made sure that everything was agreed by European leaders even before the Withdrawal Agreement was drawn up, and she now puts forward what she describes as the only deal, not first in Parliament but by way of a campaign that is no more than a thinly disguised second referendum.

The strategy, she hopes, will show that the Remainers in the country have finally won. No wonder EU leaders and officials were so quick to agree to the so-called deal. She will not be forgotten

B H

Eastbourne, East Sussex

*  *  *

Letters to the Daily Telegraph-BREXIT SPECIAL, - Tuesday,November 27,2018

[He must have read our mind.]

[The encompassing tentacles of the

Beast

 are tightening on the remaining captive ,once free peoples of Europe in preparation for a

SOON TO BE A

SUPER-STATE.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1676/2

 

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

 The More Town Hall bosses cut services, the more they line their own pockets

 

WHINGEING by our local authorities about cuts to services has long been one of the depressing soundtracks of daily political life.

Constantly, they indulge in a collective moan about lack of resources' and 'under-funding'. In recent months, as post-financial crash austerity policies have begun to take effect, the orchestrated gripes have increased in volumn.

Amid dire warnings that basic frontline services are under threat, Town Halls chiefs complain that they have no alternative but to increase the

COUNCIL TAX of FAMILIES

Yet all this bleating could hardly be less justified. The reality is that when it comes to

SPENDING

too many councils concentrate on the interests of their senior staff rather than the need of the

PUBIC

 

SQUANDERED

*

RACKET

*

DECLINE

But the rise of these professional local politicians has spawned new hierarchies.

IN London, the Mayor is assisted, among others by a Ł133,000-a-year chief of staff, a director of communications (Ł121,000), a deputy mayor for social integration (Ł126.000) and a director of external and international affairs on Ł107,000.

Traditionally, local government staff have been respected for their sense of civic pride. Town  clerks of the past were far more impressive figures than today's panjandrums. The borough secretary had more stature than any

'head of transformation'.

Fancy titles and lavish pay are no substitute for a sense of public duty and integrity. As this bloated bureaucratariat looks after itself, we witness a decline in the public services

THEY ARE MEANT TO PROVIDE.

*

[There can be no doubt that it is the influence of the EU which has since 1973 fostered the same ideology which has encouraged the change to a more collectivist and arrogant regime in local and central government which we can see all around us even in 2017. It was this which resulted in the majority of those employed by LOCAL and CENTRAL GOVERNMENT to VOTE TO REMAIN-it was all about SELF not COUNTRY and that is why they LIED about the effects of a BREXIT VOTE as has since been revealed. ]

 

 

Full article

 

DAILY MAIL- By Leo McKinstrey-

The more Town Hall bosses cut services, the more money they line their own pockets.

 

 Cornwall council has closed most of the
public toilets to save money, despite the area being a major TOURIST AREA

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

 

APRIL 12,2017

H.F.1169 BREXIT FREEDOM IS YOURS-IF YOU FIGHT FOR IT!

 

 
[THE

CON PARTY

GOT US IN THE EU IN 1973

BY

STEALTH-LIES-DECEIT

AND

IN NOVEMBER 2019

THE SIGNS ARE THAT THEY ARE UP TO THEIR OLD TRICKS ONCE MORE.

This situation has easily happened because of the failure of a robust UKIP to keep the pressure on the Government up the March 29-2019 deadline.

There has been suspicions for decades that UKIP was the brainchild of the Conservative Party and as a close observer of the political scene and having attended a number of their events we have commented  on this fact on many occasions.

 

TREASON

 

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence'

EDMUND BURKE

comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

HOW CAN YOU TRUST THEM

ONLY A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP TO A TRUE BREXIT BELIEVER CAN ENSURE A CLEAN BREAK

FROM

HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY MUST BE IN OUR HANDS AS A FAMILY OF NATION STATES IN OUR OWN ISLAND HOME. IT IS A LEGACY FROM THE PAST THAT MUST BE HANDED INTACT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS-IT IS NOT OURS TO DISREGARD AS TRAITORS WITHIN IN OUR GOVERNMENT  AND CIVIL SERVICS DID SO IN 1970's . 

NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN HANDED THE LEADERSHIP TO WINSTON CHURCHILL in 1940. SO LIKEWISE THERESA MAY SHOULD HAND THE LEADERSHIP IN 2018 TO A TRUE BREXITEER TO ENSURE THAT

JUSTICE IS DONE!

SEPTEMBER 6,2018

H.F.1525/1

 

As we mentioned a few months ago when we showed the above photograph of the teenage Theresa May with the future Chancellor of Germany Frau Merkel that such a long acquaintance spells trouble for

 BREXIT

and with information now at hand we know it does.

Compromise can be a a useful attribute in some matters but when it is the very FREEDOM-IDENTITY-CUSTOM-CONSTITUTION of a long established -unique PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY-then there can be NO COMPROMISE.

To think that it was possible for someone with strong counter view such as an acknowledged REMAINER Sto fight for the return of our and our children's INHERITANCE was a wish too far.

The coming revelation of the terms of our escape from Hitler's planned EU over the coming weeks will no doubt confirm our fears of BETRAYAL.

 

NOVEMBER 10,2018

 

* * *

30th November, [1970]

 

LETTER from Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, to Edward Heath, prior to the acceptance by Parliament of the “Treaty of Rome

 

My dear Ted,

 

You wrote to me on 30th November, [1970] - about the constitutional implications of our [The UK] becoming a party to the “Treaty of Rome”. I have now had an opportunity of considering what you say in your letter and have studied the memoranda you sent me I agree with you that there are IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES INVOLVED.

 

I have no doubt that if we do sign the TREATY, we shall suffer some LOSS of SOVEREIGNTY, but before attempting to define or evaluate the loss I wish to make one general observation.

 

 At the end of the day, the ISSUE is

Whether or NOT to join the [So-called]

 EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

 

- must be decided on broad political grounds and if it appears from what follows in

this letter that I find the constitutional objections serious that does mean that I consider them conclusive [final!]

 

I do however, think it important that we should appreciate clearly from the outset exactly WHAT, from the CONSTITUTIONAL point of view, is involved if we sign the treaty, and it is with that consideration in mind that I have addressed myself to the questions you have raised.

 

Adherence to the Treaty of Rome would in my opinion, would AFFECT our SOVEREIGNTY in three ways:-

 

PARLIAMENT would be required to surrender some of its functions to the ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

The CROWN would be called ON to TRANSFER part of its TREATY-MAKING power to those ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

OUR COURTS OF LAW would sacrifice some degree of INDEPENDENCE by becoming subordinate in certain respects to the EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.

 

The POSITION of PARLIAMENT.

 

It is clear that the memorandum prepared by your Legal advisers that the Council of Ministers could eventually (after the system of qualified majority voting had come into force) make regulations which would be binding on us even against our wishes, and would in fact become for us part of the LAW of the LAND.

 

THERE ARE TWO WAYS IN WHICH THIS REQUIREMENT OF THE TREATY COULD IN PRACTICE BE IMPLEMENTED.

 

Parliament could legislate ad hoc on each occasion that the Council make regulations requiring action by us. The difficulty would be that, since Parliament can bind neither bind itself nor its successors, we could only comply with the obligations under the TREATY if PARLIAMENT abandoned its RIGHT of passing independent judgment on the legislative proposals put before it.

 

A parallel is the CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION whereby PARLIAMENT passes the British North American Bills without question at the request of the PARLIAMENT of CANADA; in this respect PARLIAMENT here has substance if not in form, abdicated its SOVEREIGN position, and it would have pro tanto [for so much] , to do the same for the [EUROPEAN] COMMUNITY.

 

 It would in theory be possible for parliament to enact at the outset legislation which would give automatic force of law to any existing or future [EU] regulations made by the appropriate organs of the Community.  For Parliament to do this would go far beyond the most extensive delegation of -----

I do not think there is any likelihood of this being acceptable to the House of Commons. Which ever course were adopted, Parliament would retain in theory the liberty to repeal the relevant Act or Acts [Of the EU Treaty] but I would agree with you that we must act on the assumption that entry into the [EU] Community would be irrevocable; we should therefore to accept a position where Parliament had no more power to repeal its own enactments than it has in practice to abrogate the Statute of Westminster. 

 

In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the [EU] Council, or other appropriate organ of the [EU] Community, its substantive powers of legislating over a whole of a very important field.

 

Treaty –Making POWERS.

 

The proposition that every treaty entered into by the United Kingdom does to some extent fetter our freedom of action is plainly TRUE.  Some treaties such as GATT and O.E.E.C restrict severely our liberty to make agreements with third parties and I should not regard it as detrimental to our sovereign that, by signing the TREATY of ROME, we undertook not to make tariff or trade agreements without the Council’s approval.

 

BUT to transfer to the Council or the [EU] Commission the power to make such treaties on our behalf, and even against our will, is an entirely different proposition.

 

There seems to me to be a clear distinction between the exercise of sovereignty involved in the conscious acceptance by us of obligations under treaty-making powers and the total or partial surrender of sovereignty involved in our cession of these powers to some other body.

 

To confer a sovereign state’s treaty-making powers on an international organisation is the first step on the road which leads by way of confederation to the fully FEDERAL STATE.

 

I do not suggest that what is involved would necessarily carry us very far in this direction, but it would be a most significant step and one for which there is no precedent in our case.  Moreover, a further surrender of sovereignty of parliamentary supremacy would necessarily be involved as you know, although the treaty-making power is vested in the CROWN.

 

 

Parliamentary sanction is required for any treaty which involves a change in the law or the imposition of taxation (to take two examples), and we cannot ratify such a treaty unless Parliament consents. But if binding treaties are to be entered into on our behalf, Parliament must surrender this function and either resign itself to becoming a rubber stamp or give the Community, in effect, the power to amend our domestic laws.

 

Independence of the Courts.

 

There is no precedent for our final appellate tribunal being required to refer questions of law (even in a limited field) to another Court and as I assume to be the implication of “refer” to accept that Court’s decision.

 

You will remember that when a similar proposal was considered in connection with the Council of Europe we felt strong objection to it. I have no doubt that the whole of the legal profession in this country would share my dislike for such a proposal which must inevitably detract from the INDEPENDENCE and AUTHORITY of OUR COURTS.

 

 

Of these three objections, the first two are by far the more important.  I must emphasise that in my view the SURRENDERS of SOVEREIGNTY involved are SERIOUS ONES, and I think that as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade PARLIAMENT or the PUBLIC to accept them.

 

I am sure that it would be a great mistake to under-estimate the force of objections to them.  But these objections ought to be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this stage, those who are opposed to the whole idea of our joining the [EU] Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging effect later on.  Having said this, I would emphasis once again that, although these CONSTITUTIONAL considerations must be given their full weight when we come to balance the arguments on either side, I do not for one moment wish to convey the impression that they must necessarily tip the scale.  In the long run we shall have to decide whether economic factors require us to make

SACRIFICES of SOVEREIGNTY:

My concern is to ensure that we should see exactly what it is that we are called on to sacrifice, and how serious our loss would be.

 

Yours ever,      David.

 

*          *

 

[There are many hundreds of essays on the subject of constitutional  matters on our bulletin board which give the background to the CONSPIRACY of the pro-European lobby at the time and since who felt no compunction in telling LIES-LIES and more LIES.  Some of those politicians who concealed and the TRUTH and fostered the DECEIT are still with us today in 2006. –Though some have now realised how wrong they were to turn a blind eye to the blatant half-truths and downright lies in order to get the Bill through Parliament by only 8 votes. – to remind you again that many more details by INDEPENDENT sources on our bulletin board].

 

*          *          *

 

 [Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets.]

SEPTEMBER/06

 

*  *  *

 

NON-DISCLOSURE OF LEGAL ADVICE FROM THE  ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE DAY

 FIFTEEN years ago, as war with IraQ loomed, Tony Blair notoriously declined to publish the full legal advice [as Edward Heath in 1970] of his Attorney General Lord Goldsmith. To day history repeats itself. Theresa May is holding back from the public view the opinions of her Attorney General Geoffrey Cox on the legal issues surrounding Brexit.

This is outrageous, and shows how Britain still cannot learn from the mistakes of the Iraq War

 [ and from the non-disclosure of legal advice prior to our entry into the EU in 1973.]

DAILY MAIL-PETER OBORNE-SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 10,2018

 

[COMMENTS WITHIN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

 

    News for DAILY MAIL-PETER OBORNE-

    WHY THIS DEAL COULD SPARK AN ERUPTION THAT BLOWS THE TORIES APART.

     

     

     


    Daily Mail
    PETER OBORNE: Mrs May's deal could spark a Tory eruption
    Daily Mail - 18 hours ago
    For the past two years, Brexit has advanced at a snail's pace. There have been
    frequent reports that negotiations had broken down, and that negotiations had broken down, and that Theresa May was finished. ...

LAST PARAGRAPH OF MR OBORNE' S ARTICLE

... MANY voters would wonder how the Conservatives dared to change leader at such a pivotal moment for the nation. In such circumstances, I believe an event which happens only very rarely in modern politics will take place. The monarch will be forced, however  reluctantly to intervene. Fulfilling her constitutional role means the Queen-who is far more respected than any living British politician -will invite Jeremy Corbyn to try  his hand at forming a government.

I doubt he will be able to do so. at which point a number of different options will be considered.

One will be another general election. It's also likely that calls for a second referendum on Brexit would then gain strength.

It's less than eight weeks until Christmas Day, and I'm not going too far to say the destiny of Britain for the next half-century could be determined amid the carol services and sparkling trees of the festive season.

If I were a betting man, I would guess Mrs May will get her way and , for all the travails she has faced in recent months, she will yet lead Britain out of the European Union on March 29,2019.

PETER OBORNE

*  *  *

[WE find it most surprising if Theresa May is able to satisfy Brexiteers in their determination to:

LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION TO REGAIN OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE AS IT WAS BEFORE ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE PARTY LEADER EDWARD HEATH IN 1973 BETRAYED THE PEOPLE WITH GROSS LIES AND DECEIT.

AS WE STATED ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS OVER THE YEARS OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM IS BROKEN AND ONLY PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION WILL MEND IT. A GLANCE AT THE POLITICAL SCENE IN GERMANY HAS SHOWN THAT UNDER SUCH AN ARRANGEMENT EVEN  A GERMAN IRON CHANCELLOR SUCH AS FRAU MERKEL IS NOT SECURE.

IN BRITAIN IT IS A MUSICAL CHAIR ARRANGEMENT SHARED BY JUST TWO MAIN PARTIES AND ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS WAIT BEFORE THEIR RIVAL IS BROKEN.

DEMOCRACY IS ONLY SERVED WHEN THE VOICE OF ALL THE PEOPLE IS HEARD!

AND ONLY PR CAN GIVE US TRUE REPRESENTATION IN OUR ONCE FREE HALLOWED ENGLISH PARLIAMENT IN WESTMINSTER.]

NOVEMBER 10,2018

 

MORE!

 

H.F.1746

 
 
 
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

SEPTEMBER 28-2016

 

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

FEBRUARY-2016

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Happy New Year: Hundreds of top Khazarian mobsters, including the Bush family, renditioned to Gitmo

 

In a historic moment of poetic justice, most of the U.S.-based top perpetrators of the fake “war on terror” have now themselves been renditioned to the U.S. Navy camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Pentagon sources say.  “The Rothschild assets George Soros, Peter Munk, Peter Sutherland, the Bushes, the Podestas, and many others may have been airlifted to Gitmo for military tribunals, as the Department of Defense spends $500M to upgrade the prison and send more military police and Marines,” the sources say.

In one of many signs of just how historic the new American revolution is, “30 congressmen will not be returning in the new year,” the Pentagon sources say.  CIA sources also confirm that former U.S. President Bill Clinton, hoping for a plea bargain, is spilling the beans on people like former CIA head John Brennan, top U.S. Mossad agent Rahm Emmanuel, former Vice President Dick Cheney, and many others.

Furthemore, as U.S. President Donald Trump proclaims Janaury 2018 to be “Anti-Slavery Month,”
 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-proclaims-january-2018-national-slavery-human-trafficking-prevention-month/

… human trafficking centers around the world are being raided and shut down.  In Saudi Arabia, 3,000 child sex slaves have been freed, according to Russian FSB sources.  In the U.S., “there was a power outage on December 27th at the “pedo heaven Disneyland,” as the place was raided by special forces fighting human slavers, the Pentagon sources say.  In apparently connected events, Washington Post heir Bill Graham and Jordan Feldstein, the brother of the actor Jonah Hill, died last week, the sources point out.

Another move was that Julian Assange “was extracted from the Ecuadorian Embassy to take down the cabal, and he may be pardoned along with Mike Flynn,” the sources add.

Also, “On Christmas day, Delta Force raided a mansion owned by former President Barack Obama in …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Merry Christmas:  The 13 “Illuminati” bloodline families sue for peace

Peace on earth and goodwill to all (and not just men, but all life forms) is looking like a realistic goal for 2018 now that the 13 “Illuminati” * bloodline families, seeing their ancient rule of planet Earth collapsing, are suing for peace.  Last week a representative of the G7 (Germany, the U.K., the corporate U.S., Japan, Italy, France, and Canada) met with a representative of the White Dragon Society (WDS) to discuss peace terms, according to a WDS member who was present at the meeting.  The G7, of course, is the political front for the 13 bloodline families.  There can be no doubt that this meeting was made possible by people inside the military-industrial complex acting in the spirit of Jesus Christ, and for this we wish them all “a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.”

The bloodline offer to negotiate peace is directly connected to the state of emergency that was declared last week by USA President Donald Trump.  If you have not seen it yet, please read the historic document in the link below.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-congress-united-states-6/

“After Hanukkah, Trump declared a state of emergency and signed an executive order on December 20th freezing the assets of those accused of human rights abuses and corruption, a catch-all to bankrupt the Bushes, Clintons, Soros, Obama, the Cabal, and the global Jewish mafia,” was how a Pentagon source summed up the situation.

“The national emergency allows Trump to seize assets and unleash the military to carry out mass arrests and adjudicate via military tribunals, effectively imposing martial law,” the source continues.

The Pentagon source also sent a copy of this photograph with the explanation, “Trump wears purple when unveiling his national security strategy on December 18th in a victory lap over the Soros/Hillary purple revolution, and drinks water with both hands to simulate handcuffs.”

Clearly reacting to this situation, the representative of the bloodlines set the meeting for December 23rd, the birthday of the Japanese Emperor, and claimed to be a representative of the Imperial family as well as the G7.  The representative, who acted as if he was negotiating a surrender, said the bloodlines want to keep existing nation-states and institutions as they are, but…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Letter to the Editor – Experimental Quantum Anti-Gravity Successfully Replicated

 

I would like to let you know that my anti-gravity experiments have been successfully replicated by the Aerospace Engineering Department at the New Sciences & Technologies Faculty of the University of Tehran in the Islamic Republic of Iran. I have developed complete quantum anti-gravity hypothesis with direct testable predictions that are simple, clear, easy, and inexpensive.

As you know, present-day quantum gravity theories suffer from too many mathematical space dimensions, and from too few conclusive experimental results.

My hypothesis is simple, clear, and subject to easy empirical verification.  I offer clear explanation of the principles of quantum gravity, and also precisely describe how to perform simple and inexpensive experiments to verify it.

In order to clearly understand quantum anti-gravity, please follow these 8 steps:

  1. Start from this brief overview — Quantum Gravity in a Nutshell
  2. The theoretical basis for quantum gravity are the Abraham’s equations of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy, and their empirical counterpart — the Abraham force
  3. To understand how the Biefeld-Brown effect works, you need to be clear where B-B vectors point — “up” or “down”
  4. The Biefeld-Brown effect is an instance of the Abraham force.
  5. Study the section about gyroscope’s anomalous effect.
  6. Please, study all the material on THE BOYD BUSHMAN EFFECT page in order to appreciate the potential complex magnetic fields have for shaping quantum gravity interactions.
  7. Now, you are ready to read the short introduction to quantum gravity.
  8. Perform two simple experiments for empirical verification.

The following are the 10 “mysteries” that my hypothesis sheds new light upon:

  1. The main prediction of my hypothesis (2016) is that anti-hydrogen will anti-gravitate.
  2. Gravitational waves mystery.
  3. EmDrive mystery.
  4. Solar mystery.
  5. Mass mystery.
  6. Bicycle mystery.
  7. Propeller  mystery.
  8. Cloud mystery.
  9. Pioneer mystery.
  10. Missing mystery.

I have designed 4 progressively more complex experiments, and we have successfully performed one of them, the one of medium difficulty, which constitutes:

The empirical discovery of hitherto unknown physical interaction between angular momentum of a spinning gyroscope and Earth’s magnetic and electric fields.

To perform this experiment, we need a gyroscope with a vertical support, and magnetic and electric shielding cages.

According to my hypothesis, there will be a measurable time difference between a freely spinning gyroscope inside, and outside the cages.  A gyroscope freely spinning inside both cages will come to rest in less time than when spinning outside them.

The experiment was performed successfully and was recorded in the following two videos:

To have a clear idea what is involved in the experiment, please take a closer look at the above two videos first.

For the experiment, we used the following small and light gyroscope at 10,000 rpm:

It would be much better to use a heavier gyro, because the heavier the gyro, the stronger the effect, at the same rate of rpm.

The value of angular velocity (rpm) is important only insofar as to generate sufficient angular momentum to allow the gyro to spin freely for a longer time before it comes to rest.

The objective of the experiment was to obtain two values of the gyro’s run time:

  • Outside the shielding;
  • Inside the shielding.

In my experiment, the two sample values are, respectively:

  • 55.54 seconds
  • 51.87 seconds

There was a 3.67 second difference, which amounts to 6.6%.  The time difference is directly proportional to the quality and quantity of electrostatic shielding of the Faraday cage. Applying the magnetic shielding in addition to the electric one would further increase the time difference.

As you can see in the video, it is important that the gyro is elevated by means of a vertical support.  Ideally, gyro should start spinning as close to a vertical position as possible, and also be able to pass lower, while still spinning, than its horizontal position.

The reason for this effect is that the gyroscope inside the cages will be spinning in reduced strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, which in turn reduces the strength of the Biefeld-Brown effect acting upon it.

The gyroscope outside the cages, spinning in the undiminished strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, is subject to the full influence of the Biefeld-Brown effect that causes the gyroscope to resist Earth’s gravity pull, which happens to be none other than pure natural antigravity effect.

OBJECTIONS

  • All conductors, like the brass gyro, exhibit an effective diamagnetism when they experience a changing magnetic field.  The Lorentz force on electrons causes them to circulate around forming eddy currents.  The eddy currents then produce an induced magnetic field that opposes the applied field and resist the conductor’s motion.

—  That is true for both, the gyro spinning inside and outside the Faraday cage in Earth’s magnetic field.  It does not make any difference.

  • But the gyro’s induced magnetic field will generate eddy currents in the Faraday cage and the resultant magnetic field will slow down gyro’s spin (magnetic breaking), and hence the whole effect.  It is like dropping a magnet down a copper pipe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dFFL8TDt2Q

—   The analogy in the video applies, but only in principle.  Spinning brass gyro is not a strong neodymium magnet, and if, in principle, it generates any magnetic field, it is so weak that it will not even affect a needle of a compass.  As opposed to the copper pipe in the video, the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage has much larger diameter (the inverse-square law), so it is enough to drop a strong neodymium magnet down the Faraday cage to see how much it would slow down, if at all.  As you can see in the above video, even few empty slits in the copper pipe greatly weaken the eddy currents, this being the reason for using enamel-coated copper mesh.  Diamagnetic materials, like brass, or copper, have a relative magnetic permeability that is less than or equal to 1, and therefore a magnetic susceptibility less than or equal to 0, since susceptibility is defined as χv=μv−1.  This means that diamagnetic materials, in principle, are repelled by magnetic fields.  However, since diamagnetism is such a weak property, its effects are not observable in everyday life.  Moreover, there is a big difference between Faraday cage made of solid copper, and one made of enamel-coated copper mesh.  The magnetic field induced in the gyro is weak, because Earth’s magnetic field is weak, so whatever little eddy currents could be induced by the gyro in solid copper Faraday cage will become irrelevant in the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage, as you can see in the following two videos:

Even though it is true that the experiment, in principle, is open to influences from various phenomena, including the Carnegie curve, the overall result is clearly well beyond being attributed exclusively to these other phenomena.

To completely eliminate above objections, magnetic shielding needs to be applied in addition to the Faraday cage, and the gyro should be custom-made from a material which does not allow for eddy currents to flow in it.

Naturally,  I will be happy to answer any questions that you may have for me regarding the theoretical foundations as well as replication of the experiment.

With respect and much gratitude,  I am
Sincerely yours,

U.S. troops deploy worldwide with 10,000 sealed indictments to take down Khazarian mob

U.S. President Donald Trump spent the weekend at Camp David with his top generals to map out the exact strategy for decapitating the Khazarian mafia worldwide, say Pentagon sources.  “The Atlanta airport was shut down, while the Department of Defense refused to disclose the locations of 44,000 U.S. troops who may be involved in terminating the cabal worldwide,” a senior Pentagon source said.  There are now close to 10,000 sealed indictments as more and more of the Khazarian criminals give up evidence on their colleagues, the sources say.

There are also many extra-judicial killings going on.  “The liberal sanctuary city mayor of San Francisco, Edwin Lee, dropped dead after an illegal alien was found not guilty in the murder of Kate Steinle even after his confession,” one source notes.  “Lee’s death is a message to the Democrats and sanctuary city mayors like Rahm Emmanuel of Chicago and Bill De Blasio of New York City,” the source warns.

The Khazarian mob is also killing off lots of people.  In Japan, two former executives of Toshiba, Atsutoshi Nishida and Taizo Nishimura, suddenly died in the past two months because they were about to provide evidence about the March 11, 2011 Fukushima tsunami and nuclear terror attack against Japan, according to sources close to the royal family.

This attack was carried out by henchmen of the Rockefeller family, whose members include Hillary and Bill Clinton, the sources say.  The Rockellers, in turn, were taking orders from the fascist P2 Freemason lodge, they say.  The Rockefeller family, by the way, has elected Mel Rockefeller, the son of Nelson Rockefeller, as the new family head, these sources added.

In Canada, Barry Sherman, owner of the Canadian pharmaceutical giant Apotex, was found hanging dead alongside his wife Honey by the family’s indoor pool.  According to CIA sources, Sherman was …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

H.F.1430

 

 
 
 

 

 A GIANT PONZI SCHEME THAT DESERVED TO GO TO THE WALL

...even though Carillions collapse

 shames CAPITALISM

and puts the wind in Labour's sails says ALEX BRUMMER

 

News for DAILY MAIL-A GIANT PONZI SCHEME THAT DESERVED TO GO TO THE WALL by ALEX BRUMMER

 

ALEX BRUMMER: A giant Ponzi scheme that deserved to go to the wall... even though Carillion's collapse shames capitalism and puts the wind in Labour's sails



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5273135/ALEX-BRUMMER-Carillion-deserved-wall.html#ixzz54RK5sa9n
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The collapse of the Wolverhampton -based construction group Carillion is catastrophic for its 43,000 employees at home and overseas, for the Government and for members of the stricken pension fund.

It represents a nadir for the private sector outsourcing companies which, since the era of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, have been relied upon to deliver all manner of public services, from building hospitals and schools to modernising the NHS and even providing school meals.

In the fierce scramble for business among these behemoths, Carillion was so desperate for contracts that it consistently overpromised on the work it could do for an agreed cost. When it failed to deliver on time and on price, as was the case with the new 646-bed Royal Liverpool hospital, the group went on a borrowing spree.

 

More than 20,000 jobs in the UK, and more overseas, are at risk after Carillion ran out of time to find a way to restructure its Ł1.5bn debt burden. Pictured: A staff member outside an office in London

Its debts grew to Ł900 million, an impossibly large sum to manage when its share price was going into freefall during the course of last year.

Plunge

In effect Carillion, chaired by former water company boss Philip Green, had become a mammoth Ponzi scheme in which the cash promised or received for newer contracts was effectively being used to cover up the black holes on the older contracts.

Why Carillion has careered into crisis 

The Wolverhampton-based firm, the backbone behind a raft of public infrastructure projects, is teetering over a precipice.

The company is the second largest construction firm in the UK but has debts of about Ł1.5billion and a pension fund shortfall of almost Ł600million. 

So how has it got into this mess? Most analysts agree that the answer is simple. It has over-reached itself.

Carillion they argue has its fingers in too many pies at homes and abroad from the Battersea Power station redevelopment in the UK to operations in Canada, the Middle East and the Caribbean.

The company's incessant desire to expand has resulted in it pursuing too many risky contracts - some accompanied by questionable accounting practices - that have become increasingly unprofitable. 

It has furthermore faced delays in payments in the Middle East.

The firm in recent months has found  it much harder to manage its mountainous debt pile and pension deficit.

In December Carillion managed to persuade lenders to give it more time to repay them. But the company's banks are now understood to be unwilling to lend it any more cash.

What is unconscionable in all this is that over the past two decades, before its troubles emerged, Carillion paid out vast sums in dividends to shareholders (seeking to keep them sweet) and bonuses to fat-cat directors — including former chief executive Richard Howson, dismissed last July — yet allowed the pension fund deficit to balloon to an officially estimated Ł900 million.

The burden of sorting this out will now fall squarely on bail-out body the Pension Protection Fund, which is financed by raising a levy on the functioning pension schemes into which millions of us contribute.

Among the more astonishing aspects of the scandal is that even as Carillion’s share price plunged in the second half of last year, Transport Secretary Chris Grayling, as well as other ministers and civil servants, still felt it was safe to gift the firm new contracts. City investors and hedge funders had already recognised that the company was struggling for survival and could no longer pay its thousands of suppliers in good time. If ever there was a case of the Government throwing good money after bad, this was it.

The business-friendly Tory Government, deliberately or naively, awarded Carillion three new contracts within days of the company admitting several major projects had gone wrong to the tune of Ł800 million — an announcement that provoked a 30 per cent plunge in the group’s shares last July.

A week after that first public warning that it was all going to hell in a handcart, Grayling’s department revealed that Carillion would partner another construction group on a Ł1.4 billion contract to work on the flagship Ł56 billion HS2 railway project.

Days later, Carillion was told by the Ministry of Defence it had been chosen to provide ‘catering, retail and leisure’ services for 233 military facilities. These contracts provided some temporary relief for the firm’s books.

But confidence in Carillon’s ability to manage the crisis, in spite of the new contracts, was fading fast, and in September it warned again that profits would fall short of expectations.

Yet the Government still gambled that it was a good bet, and awarded it a key infrastructure project to electrify the railway connecting Corby in Northamptonshire with London.

Ironically, the contracts for these large-scale, taxpayer-funded projects were given out at a time when Carillion’s chief executive and finance director were departing, and the share price was tanking. Yet Whitehall, in their naivety, sailed serenely on.

The collapse of Carillion comes hard on the heels of the decision by Virgin Trains and its partner Stagecoach to hand back the East Coast railway service to the Government, at a potential taxpayer cost of Ł2 billion. These two disasters have not only left the Government looking very silly, but also given a fillip to those supporters of Jeremy Corbyn on the Left who are convinced capitalism is wicked, and that only re-nationalisation of public services is the answer.

 

Carillion workers lined up outside a staff office to check on the status of their jobs in London yesterday morning

Sure enough, Shadow Cabinet Office minister Jon Trickett has been quick to exploit the misfortunes of Carillion’s workforce and pensioners, asking what ‘due diligence measures were undertaken before awarding contracts worth billions of taxpayer money’.

Failure

What he failed to acknowledge is that the most enthusiastic embrace of private outsourcing companies came during the last Labour government, which used firms such as Carillion to replace Britain’s Victorian hospitals, to build modern schools, expand universities and begin the process of updating the nation’s railways and roads.

Much went wrong at Carillion, including the failure of highly paid auditors KPMG to lay bare the company’s parlous financial state.

But then independent directors and major investors failed to question a record dividend payout to investors of nearly Ł80 million in 2016, even as the company headed for the rocks and the huge shortfall in the pension fund grew ever larger. (Labour MP Frank Field, who chairs the Pensions Select Committee, castigated Carillion for taking on ‘mega borrowings while its pension deficit ballooned’.)

None of these attacks can be very comfortable for Baroness (Sally) Morgan, former political secretary to Tony Blair, who joined the Carillion board as an independent director in June 2017, shortly before the fateful disclosure to the stock market that the company was in deep trouble.

The collapse of Carillion also shines a light on the wider outsourcing industry, and the ability of huge private firms to be responsible capitalists when they are given hundreds of millions in public money.

Other companies including Serco, Mitie, Balfour Beatty and G4S have all experienced difficulties with Government contracts: there has been a tendency for them to take on too much and become financially over-stretched.

Stupidity

With the help of experts in company turnarounds, some have managed to clean up the contracts under their management and bounce back.

But it’s too late for Carillion, which ran its affairs in a helter-skelter, irresponsible manner, yet still managed to keep the Government on side until the very end. Some have questioned why the Tories chose not to bail the firm out in the way it seems to have done with the train companies running the East Coast line.

But that surely would have sparked public fury — after all, if capitalism is to survive and thrive as Britain’s chosen economic model then weakness or stupidity must not be allowed to flourish.

Of course, Carillion’s collapse is a dreadful blow, and even now it will prove expensive for taxpayers, who will have to fund the company’s most vital operations until the insolvency practitioners can sell on the contracts.

But it would be a serious misjudgment if this debacle were used as an excuse for bringing an end to the role of private enterprise in building more efficient public services.

Enterprise and ambition in business have been the lifeblood of Britain for centuries. What a shame that it took the collapse of Carillion to remind us how it should not be done.

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.1439

 

 

 

EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED

 AS ILLEGAL

 

A criminalized organisation

 

Monday 10th October, 2005- London.

 

BRITAIN CAN LEAVE

THIS ILLEGAL ‘FESTERING DUSTBIN OF CORRUPTION’ TOMORROW

 

The European Union Collective is illegal and so extensively criminalized that it has become all but indistinguishable from a criminal organization.

 

It is illegal because key EU treaties were procured by means of slush fund payments.

 
It is criminal because, being born in corruption, its procedures are designed to mask the corrupt activities of many of its officials, while it publishes false accounts.
 
Britain is free to leave immediately, as explained below.

 

These findings are published today the 10th October, 2005 in the latest issue of International Currency Review, the London -based Journal of the International Financial Community.

 

·                The fraudulence of the European Commission’s accounts necessitates urgent consideration of its Triple-A Credit Rating by the leading Rating Agencies. Precise evidence of the fraudulence of the EC’s accounts is presented in the issue. (Normally this scandalous state of affairs is ‘successfully’ shoved under the carpet).

·                International Currency Review has advised the agencies accordingly, and anticipates that they will carry out the necessary overdue reassessment of the EU’s ‘integrity’. In the event that zero action is taken, given the extreme gravity of the evidence of institutionalised accounting fraud presented in the journal, the integrity of the Credit Rating Agencies themselves may be called into question - not least by International Currency Review.

 

This may have repercussions for the International Financial Community generally.

*

WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS ILLEGAL AND ILLEGITIMATE

 

But first things first. The illegitimacy and illegality of the European Union-and thus of ALL its constituent structures, including the European Central Bank - arises from the following facts:

 

The British Treaty of Accession was signed by two agents of the German ‘Black’ Nazi intelligence continuum, DVD -This is the ultra-secret German Nazi continuing ‘Black Operations’ intelligence organisation based, appropriately enough, in Dachau, near Munich.

 

Intelligence concerning the existence was passed to the Editor of

International Currency Review:

 

 

 

Christopher Story FRSA - Veteran UK financial and intelligence analyst

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org Telephone +44-(0) 20-7222 3836

 

by

 British intelligence sources

 

 The Editor then had its contents checked out by high -level US intelligence contacts, who confirmed the entity’s existence and importance.

 There remains some uncertainty about what the initials DVD stand for- alternatively Deutsche Versicherungs Dienst [German Insurance Agency] or else Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst [German Defence Agency] - the context here being that DVD is the intelligence [Abwehr] continuum of the

 

NAZI INTERNATIONAL

 

Originally established by the Nazi Abwehr as the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid in 1942.

 

Therefore, in this context, ‘insurance’ would mean ‘insurance’ would mean ‘insuring the continuity of Nazi global hegemony strategy for the controlling

a

Thousand-Year Reich.’

 

While ‘defence’ in this same context would mean ‘defending’ the continuing covert Nazi global hegemony strategy.

 DVD is not funded by the German Government and Taxpayer, since it operates its own covert sources of giga-finance; but its primary operations and strategy are routinely approved by the German Chancellery.

 Any official denial of this fact is a lie

 

To continue:

 

The signatories, both - of The British treaty of Accession whom received substantial financial rewards for their ‘co-operation’, were Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon. Together with the late Roy Jenkins, they were recruited by the German Abwehr while studying at Balliol College, Oxford. This intelligence has emerged since the recent death of Sir Edward Heath [Another Traitor amongst many who have been honoured by the Queen with a title]

 

*

THE E.U. TREATIES ARE ROUTINELY PROCURED BY FRAUDULENT MEANS:

 

That is to say, official signatories and senior policymakers/operatives have received substantial corrupt payments, remitted to their secret offshore bank accounts, in exchange for their ‘co-operation’ in pushing through successive E.U. Treaties.

 

The bribery funds are derived from a colossal secret ‘Black Operations’ slush fund account located in Switzerland -the title and size of which is divulged in the REPORT.

 

For instance:

 

$5.0 billion was allocated in 2004 from the secret Swiss slush fund to ‘procure’ the European Constitution Treaty, divided into two branches:

 

1)             $2.5 billion was allocated (and paid out) on completion of the Inter Governmental Conference [IGC], in July/August of 2004, with $100 million allocated for each of the 25 EU’Member States’. The corrupt bribery funds were remitted to the National officials concerned in Euros.

2)              

 

A further $2.5 billion ($100 million for each ‘Member State’) was payable on ratification of the Collective Treaty.

  Given the negative referendum results delivered by the French and Dutch electorates, payment of the second branch has been a matter of understandable tension and contention ever since, not least since such ‘Black’ remittances, which are common place at the intergovernmental level are illegal -and therefore ‘never happened’.

 

 

Intelligence sources have provided International Currency Review with the NAME of the secret Swiss bank account, the vast amount of ‘Black’ money it holds, the amounts allocated for each corrupted EU ‘Member State’, plus the names of three of the most prominent alleged recipients of ‘Black’ payments, together with details of the alleged transactions concerned.

 

[WE DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK BUT THIS REPORT MUST PUT THE PRO-EUROPE FACTION LITERALLY IN A SPIN AND FEAR OF THE OUTCOME WHEN THE CONSPIRACY IS FULLY REVEALED]

 

We have more to follow(See at bottom of page.)

*

 EXPOSURES TRIGGERED BY THE DEATH OF

SIR EDWARD HEATH

 

These revelations have become possible following the death of Sir Edward Heath, who was a German agent and asset for six decades - the longest known foreign intelligence penetration in modern history.

 

It is significant that the extensive Obituary of Heath published in the Guardian on 18th July 2005, closed with the cryptic sentence:

 

‘He [Heath] remained determined that he would be vindicated, until close to the end.

 

This referred to the fact that when Heath visited Salzburg in 2003, ostensibly to attend the Music Festival there, the real reason for his visit was that he had been summoned to Dachau, where DVD officers warned him that

British intelligence were intending to confront him with his treachery.

 It is reported that, on hearing this, Heath literally ‘blew a fuse’: he suffered a pulmonary embolism.

 A similar fate attended the demise of the late Roy (Lord) Jenkins who suffered a severe heart attack when confronted by intelligence officials with the fact that he was about to be exposed for his long-term treachery against the United Kingdom.

 Roy Jenkins was one of the most lethal of all long-term German agents operating at the highest levels of the British Government.

 

And

 the present allegedly deeply compromised Tony Blair is the late Lord Jenkins’ protégé.

 

Heath, Rippon and Jenkins were far from being the only long-term. High-level foreign penetrations by the DVD-the successor ‘Black’ (continuing Nazi) intelligence organisation to the Abwehr.

 

In the United States, the Dulles brothers were German agents to this day. Substantial transfers of ‘Black’ Operations’ funds originally controlled by the United States authorities are known to have been transferred into the hands of the German ‘Black’ covert intelligence community. The CIA is belatedly being to some extent purged of operators with ethnic and other loyalties and ties to Germany.

 

TENSIONS

EXIST WITHIN INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES BECAUSE OF THIS PENETRATION

*

 

THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES.

 

Given that

 

(a)   The United Kingdom’s EEC Accession Treaty,

(b)   The Maastricht Treaty of 1992 and

(c)     The (aborted) European Constitution Treaty were among E.U. bilateral and collective Treaties that were procured by corrupt and fraudulent means,

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION IS AN ILLEGAL ORGANISATION.

 

This is because Article 49 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on Treaties, to which Britain and the other EU ‘Member States’ are parties, provides as follows:

‘If a State has been induced to conclude a Treaty by the fraudulent conduct of another negotiating State, that State may invoke the fraud as invalidating its consent to be bound by the Treaty.

 

[* The first tranche of corrupt payments for the European Constitution Treaty was paid out, but the fate of the second tranche, given the negative French and Dutch referenda outcomes, is uncertain - as well as being the subject of vicious secret controversy]

 

According to intelligence sources, earlier EU Collective treaties were likewise procured by fraudulent means.

 

In the British case, UK Membership of the European Union Collective -an illegal organisation which exists to subsume, usurp and collectivise national sovereignty under the enticing cover of ‘co-operation’ (code for collectivisation)-contravenes the 1689 Bill of Rights which remains the LAW of the United Kingdom to this day and which incorporates the following Oath:

 

‘I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority with this Realm’

*

 

WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION

 

In addition to exposing the illegality and illegitimacy of the European Union as a whole, International Currency Review [Volume 30, Number 4] demonstrates, with extensive analysis and documentation, that the European Commission is a criminal organisation.

 

The issue has been prepared in close collaboration with Ashley Mote, -Independent MEP for Southeast England, [www.ashleymote.co.uk] and Continental MEP colleagues. In October 2004, Mr Mote and Marta Andreason, the former Chief Accountant of the European Commission, presented the UK Serious Fraud Office with two large lever-arch files containing voluminous damning information about institutionalised corruption in the EU Commission and related EU structures.

 NO ACTION WAS TAKEN

 

[Does the stink of corruption in high places prevent the Rule of Law from taking place?]

 

Among the reasons for concluding that the European Union is a criminal organisation, are the following:

 

1)         Because successive Presidents of the European Union preside over the disbursement of the corrupt ‘Black’ ‘facilitation fees’ identified, each successive (six-monthly) President is and has been aware of the corrupt mechanism used to procure the EU’s successive collective Treaties.

2)         The incidence of fraud committed within the EU’s structures is so extensive and routine, that the European Commission has been condemned as openly condoning a ‘culture of corruption’, and presiding over a system of ‘institutional looting’. Scandalised EC whistle blowing officials refer to the European Commission as a ‘festering dustbin of corruption’. In 2004, there were nearly 3,500 cases of EC fraud.

3)         When informed in 2004 that the EC Vice - President-designate, Jacques Barrot, had been convicted for embezzlement of funds, and had withheld this information from the European Commission’s President-designate, Sr. Jose-Manuel Barroso, the new President denied any prior knowledge of this fact, and left Barrot in place.

4)         It is nothing unusual for European Commission officials to be associated with lucrative corrupt ‘side businesses’-often using offshore accounts-from which they benefit financially, consequent upon contracts being awarded to the businesses in which they themselves have a secret pecuniary interest. For instance:

5)         The Sunday Telegraph reported on 25th September -2005 that two EC employees own a Brussels sex hotel, Studio Europe, which rents out rooms for 13 euros an hour. No doubt this location is used for blackmail purposes. The EC officials in question were named as Carmela lo Guidance, an assistant in the EC Budget Directorate-General and George Tizzies a porter in the Directorate-General responsible for employment. This is the latest of innumerable EC scandals to have erupted into the public domain, some of which are examined in the Special Issue [out on Monday 10th October 2005.]

6)         Unhealthy and evidently pervasive masonic links exist between European Commission officials and contractors, resulting in corrupt and unhealthy ‘business relationships’.

7)    The European Commission’s accounting is NOT only shambolic, but also fraudulent. Evidence to this effect is presented, inter alia, by the well-known British forensic accountant Christopher Arkell, FTCA, and by former Chief Accountant of the European Commission, Marta Andreason. She was ‘suspended’ after five months en poste, and then fired, after she questioned the legitimacy of payments that Directorates-General required her to authorise. She asked awkward questions, and was effectively told to ‘shut up and just sign’.

8)    The EC’s accounting irregularities, which are glaring, include the following abuses: When certain accounting modifications were implemented at the end of 2004, the closing balances in 2004 and the opening balances in 2005 were not reconciled- thereby permanently embedding false accounting data for the future. This means that henceforth no European Commission accounts can ever be accurate (not that this has ever been the case).

Even though EU ‘Member States’ have been making payments to the Commission for decades to cover the costs of pension liabilities for approximately 39,000 EC employees (as of 2005), the EU ‘Member States’ have simultaneously been charged with the liability of making/guaranteeing the resulting pension payments. Thus pension liabilities appear on both sides of the balance sheet. Proper accounting practice would require a charge to the Income and Expenditure Account of

 EUR 19.5 billion

 

And a consequent reduction in reserves.

 The European Commission should have been acquiring a liability for pensions throughout its existence instead of fudging the accounts in this fraudulent and irregular manner.

The European Commission ‘makes’ massive surpluses out of the ‘Member States’ annually, which it covers up

 

Surpluses are supposed according to the EU’s own regulations, to be returned to the ‘Member States’. What happens in practice is that the EC surpluses that have arisen after all accruals have been accounted for, are eliminated by the simple manipulative expedient of providing for potential expenditures not openly through the Income and Expenditure Account, but by means of corrupt adjustments to the Balance Sheet (‘Provisions’).

 

This method of accounting is prohibited by all recognised accounting standards around the world as DISHONEST.

 

Its use by the European Commission represents a clear fraud perpetuated upon ‘Member States’ and their troubled and exploited peoples.

EC accounting records can be changed two or more years in arrears. The amount and the payee, but not the unique identifying number, can be altered, and no record whatsoever of such changes is/has been maintained in the records. This represents an open-ended invitation to scam the system, especially as it is routine for the EC’s Annual Accounts to be adjusted retrospectively.

 

The huge Eurocracy (or self-interested EU nomenklatura) has perfected subtle mechanisms for ensuring that hardly anything is ever done to stamp out the corruption over which it has presided for decades. These techniques include, but are not confined to the following:

 

The use of ‘candour’,

 which is NOT to be confused with the truth. ‘Candour’ is deployed in order to disarm, mislead, divert and mollify critics, so that any underlying fraud goes undetected.

 

The ‘multiple investigations’ technique

 

8.2) What happens is that several investigations are ‘opened’ separately. Further internal ‘investigations’ may follow. Some are then ‘closed’, or ‘suspended’, ostensibly ‘pending’ the ‘results’ of other investigations.

The resulting, deliberately contrived, confusion, with successive reports contradicting others, ensures that the corruption trail is buried and lost.

 

Report-writing is used to smother transparency, clarity, and TRUTH, with the sole objective of obfuscating the underlying looting and corruption.

 

8.3) The EC and its structures have at least 3,094 secret ‘working groups’ or committees, all of which are answerable to no-one, and the operations of which are secret.

 

8.4)             The main objective of any EC fraud investigation is to procure that the case is ‘exported’ as quickly as possible to the ‘Member States’ concerned, so that any corruption at the EC centre is consequently hidden from scrutiny.

8.5)             Wherever possible, investigations are kept unresolved until the existing Commission is duly replaced by its successor-when the ‘that was then, this is now’ excuse kicks in.

8.6)             Innumerable other deliberate obstruction methods, identified by International Currency Review with the guidance of Ashley Mote MEP and his colleagues, are routinely employed by the EC and related structures, to maximise the obfuscation of troubling problems.

 For instance, one external corporation, based in Luxembourg, in which EC officials had an interest, was ostensibly established on 29th February 1989-a date which never even existed, which meant that the entity was ‘invisible’.

 

When a sanitised official report on the entity’s fraudulent activities was presented to the former President of the European Commission, Signor Romano Prodi - that allegedly corrupt Italian ‘machine’ politician- the date was altered to 22nd February 1989.

 

This further illustrated the devious standard European Commission technique of promulgating conflicting information in separate contradictory reports. By this means, controversy is deflected into sterile arguments over the conflicting information-diverting attention from the institutionalised internal looting itself.

8.7)             The European Court of Auditors has given an adverse opinion for many years, on 95% of all European Commission Expenditure.

It has never, ever, approved the EC’s accounts.

 

Furthermore evidence has surfaced of fraud in the Court’s own accounts -one of several indications that the Court itself cannot be trusted. Indeed, like the Commission’s own internal Audit Service, its main task, by open official admission, is to minimise embarrassment to the Commission.

 

The damning evidence of institutionalised European Commission looting and serial corruption covered up by the EC authorities contained in the single issue of International Currency Review is sufficient to induce a terminal crisis at the European Commission.

 *

WHY BRITISH PAYMENTS TO THE EC MUST CEASE FORTHWITH.

 

Both Ashley Mote MEP and the journal’s Editor, Christopher Story, demand that the UK Treasury sits up, finally takes notice, and withholds further contributions to the EC budget pending elimination of institutionalised corruption and looting in the European Commission’s structures -

which will never happen.

 In a letter to Ashley Mote dated 22nd October 2004, Stephen Timms, the Treasury Minister, told the MEP that withholding British payments to the EC would be illegal and would be an ‘option’ we would not consider’

 BUT

 

Continued squandering of UK Taxpayers (OUR MONEY) represents a dereliction by British Ministers and their officials, of their duty of care towards UK taxpayer’s funds.

Given the conspicuous gravity of the situation, Ministers are believed to be increasing the risk of being sued for negligence as exposures of the European Commission’s ‘culture of corruption’ proliferate.

 

[At this moment in Time in the UK millions of people on tax-credits who were overpaid because of technical problems are being asked to hand the money back. They should ALL insist that the Treasury should try the European Commission and ask their employees to point the finger and explain were the billions of pounds of OUR money is resting in banks in Switzerland. WE should certainly have a great deal of compound interest to collect at the same time]

 

Moreover the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Lawson of Blaby, has advised the House of Lords’ European Committee that the British Government DOES possess the legal scope to give itself powers to withhold payments to the European Commission.

 

He told the Committee:

 

‘You have to remember how hard it was to win the (UK) rebate…It would never have happened if we had not made clear that if we did not get satisfaction, we would withhold our contributions.

It was never published, but it was printed. It was discreetly known to those who we negotiated with, that this is what would happen if we did not get satisfaction….Without that threat to withhold our contributions, to the extent of having the UK law officers produce a bill, we would have NOT got [the Rebate].’

 

[Source: Future Financing of the European Union, House of Lords European Committee, HL Paper 62, 9th March 2005.]

 

But since Britain’s EU membership is illegal, because the UK Accession Treaty and successive EU Collective Treaties (notably Maastricht) were procured by fraud, it is not even technically necessary for the Government to extract that draft bill from the official pigeon-hole into which it was shoved.

*

BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION TOMORROW: NO PROBLEM.

 

The Government can walk away from the European Union Tomorrow- and use the 25% of gross Domestic Product represented by all current and future costs of the EU membership:

 

To rebuild the Public Transportation system.

 

Build spanking new ‘Schools and Hospitals’ wherever demand exists.

 

And revitalise the BRITISH economy generally.

 

All without suffering any losses since EU membership has brought Britain no clear benefits at all, that could not have been procured domestically. It has however, meant that billions of UK taxpayers’ funds that the British Government should have been spending at home, have been squandered on this sterile, decaying collectivist project, led by corrupted and blackmailed politicians and operatives.

 

All EU ‘Member States’, valuing the huge British market for their goods, would be compelled to negotiate arms’-length bilateral trade and other agreements with the United Kingdom, or risk losing access to UK markets. Any prospective interim disruptions could be accommodated by the British Government directing the UK taxpayers’ funds that it normally squanders with the EC’s ‘festering dustbin of corruption’, into temporarily vulnerable sectors of the UK economy.

 

A Free Trade Agreement linking Britain, the United States and Canada has bee readied, for implementation when Britain leaves the European Community.

 

For, contrary to what is in the public domain, contingency plans do exist in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union.

8.7)             The European Court of Auditors has given an adverse opinion for many years, on 95% of all European Commission Expenditure.

It has never, ever, approved the EC’s accounts.

 

Furthermore evidence has surfaced of fraud in the Court’s own accounts -one of several indications that the Court itself cannot be trusted. Indeed, like the Commission’s own internal Audit Service, its main task, by open official admission, is to minimise embarrassment to the Commission.

 

The damning evidence of institutionalised European Commission looting and serial corruption covered up by the EC authorities contained in the single issue of International Currency Review is sufficient to induce a terminal crisis at the European Commission.

 *

WHY BRITISH PAYMENTS TO THE EC MUST CEASE FORTHWITH.

 

Both Ashley Mote MEP and the journal’s Editor, Christopher Story, demand that the UK Treasury sits up, finally takes notice, and withholds further contributions to the EC budget pending elimination of institutionalised corruption and looting in the European Commission’s structures -

which will never happen.

 In a letter to Ashley Mote dated 22nd October 2004, Stephen Timms, the Treasury Minister, told the MEP that withholding British payments to the EC would be illegal and would be an ‘option’ we would not consider’

 BUT

 

Continued squandering of UK Taxpayers (OUR MONEY) represents a dereliction by British Ministers and their officials, of their duty of care towards UK taxpayer’s funds.

Given the conspicuous gravity of the situation, Ministers are believed to be increasing the risk of being sued for negligence as exposures of the European Commission’s ‘culture of corruption’ proliferate.

 

[At this moment in Time in the UK millions of people on tax-credits who were overpaid because of technical problems are being asked to hand the money back. They should ALL insist that the Treasury should try the European Commission and ask their employees to point the finger and explain were the billions of pounds of OUR money is resting in banks in Switzerland. WE should certainly have a great deal of compound interest to collect at the same time]

 

Moreover the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Lawson of Blaby, has advised the House of Lords’ European Committee that the British Government DOES possess the legal scope to give itself powers to withhold payments to the European Commission.

 

He told the Committee:

 

‘You have to remember how hard it was to win the (UK) rebate…It would never have happened if we had not made clear that if we did not get satisfaction, we would withhold our contributions.

It was never published, but it was printed. It was discreetly known to those who we negotiated with, that this is what would happen if we did not get satisfaction….Without that threat to withhold our contributions, to the extent of having the UK law officers produce a bill, we would have NOT got [the Rebate].’

 

[Source: Future Financing of the European Union, House of Lords European Committee, HL Paper 62, 9th March 2005.]

 

But since Britain’s EU membership is illegal, because the UK Accession Treaty and successive EU Collective Treaties (notably Maastricht) were procured by fraud, it is not even technically necessary for the Government to extract that draft bill from the official pigeon-hole into which it was shoved.

*

BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION TOMORROW: NO PROBLEM.

 

The Government can walk away from the European Union Tomorrow- and use the 25% of gross Domestic Product represented by all current and future costs of the EU membership:

 

To rebuild the Public Transportation system.

 

Build spanking new ‘Schools and Hospitals’ wherever demand exists.

 

And revitalise the BRITISH economy generally.

 

All without suffering any losses since EU membership has brought Britain no clear benefits at all, that could not have been procured domestically. It has however, meant that billions of UK taxpayers’ funds that the British Government should have been spending at home, have been squandered on this sterile, decaying collectivist project, led by corrupted and blackmailed politicians and operatives.

 

All EU ‘Member States’, valuing the huge British market for their goods, would be compelled to negotiate arms’-length bilateral trade and other agreements with the United Kingdom, or risk losing access to UK markets. Any prospective interim disruptions could be accommodated by the British Government directing the UK taxpayers’ funds that it normally squanders with the EC’s ‘festering dustbin of corruption’, into temporarily vulnerable sectors of the UK economy.

 

A Free Trade Agreement linking Britain, the United States and Canada has bee readied, for implementation when Britain leaves the European Community.

 

For, contrary to what is in the public domain, contingency plans do exist in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union.

These were recently reviewed and ‘dusted down’, in the context of key connections made by certain intelligence circles following the 7/7 attacks, which have shown that EU Member States’ that profess to be allies of the United Kingdom

are anything but.

 

Exposure information for this special issue of International Currency Review

[Vol.30, No4] has been developed with the generous practical assistance of Ashley Mote MEP. Paul van Buitenen MEP, Marta Andreason, Christopher Arkle FTCA and the US and UK intelligence sources special to the Editor, Christopher Story.

 

For further details, see Ashley Mote’s website: www.ashleymote.co.uk.

 

 

International Currency Review, VOL. 30 NO 4

[extracts from 153 pages -shown above], available by subscription from www.worldreports.org. was mailed to paying subscribers worldwide on

 

10th October 2005

Also

 

AVAILABLE SOON

 

THE NEW UNDERWORLD ORDER

 

*Published by: EDWARD HARLE LTD

(Source of ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books.

108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, LONDON SW1P 2EF

Orders@edwardharle.com . Tel-Orderline +44 [0207-222-2635

 

*

  

PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF BULLETINS AT THE END OF THIS ARTICLE FURTHER TO THE ABOVE SUBJECT

 2005

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

 

 
PATRIOTIC

PATRIOTIC

WETHERSPOON

 

DITCHES BOOZE FROM EU

BY HOLLY BLACK

DAILY MAIL

JUNE 14-2018

 
 

PUB chain WETHERSPOON

 is to

STOP SELLING WINE AND BEER

FROM

FRANCE and GERMANY

AHEAD OF

BREXIT

It will focus on offering more beverages from the UK and non EU producers across its 880 from JULY 9,2018.

Champagne and German wheat beers will be switched for English sparkling wine and craft beers in the run-up to leaving the EU.

But Kopparberg cider, which is currently made in Sweden, will stay stocked after the Swedish firm said it will switch production to the UK.

JD Wetherspoon chairman Tim Martin said:

'This is the start of a review of all our products in the next six to 24 months, with the object of making our business more competitive.'

He said tariffs imposed by the 'protectionist' EU were keeping prices high for UK consumers.

Some 2million people visit Wetherspoon pubs every week

The group sells more than 6million bottles of Kopparberg and 2million bottles of sparkling wine and prosecco every year, but fewer than 100,000 bottles of champagne are bought at its pubs.

In place of French fizz, the pubs will offer UK sparkling wine brands Denbies and Whitedowns as well as Australian Hardy wines. Meanwhile UK brewed wheat beers Blue Moon,Belguim White, Thornbridge Versa Weisse and mSA Braines Atlantic White will replace German brands such as Erdinger.

Russ Mould, investment director at saving firm AJ Bell, said

'Tim Martin's strong held political views are well known and you have to respect anyone's ability to stick to their principles so firmly.

'Excluding popular brands of drinks based on their country of origin seems an unusual move for a firm which you would think wants to be seen as inclusive and welcoming to customers of all views and beliefs, but Mr Martin knows his customers and has successfully built the firm by providing

VALUE FOR MONEY.

Mr Martin said Brexit would create big marking opportunities for UK and non-EU producers, which the pub group is keen to encourage.

The Wetherspoon chairman added: 'The products awe are introducing are at a lower prices than EU products they are replacing.

'We intend to honour existing contracts with EU suppliers some of which have several years to run, but we are starting to make the transition to

NON-EU TRADE

NOW.

 [CHEERS!-MR MARTIN]

*

JUNE 14-2018

 

 

 

 
Unfortunately, the Godless European Union does have associations with 'The Beast' . It cannot be a coincidence that a massive Brussels-based computer called EURO NET, capable of storing all the personal data of the world's entire population, is nicknamed 'The Beast'.  The disturbing motif of the wanton women riding a modified beast from the Book of Revelations, Chapter 17, verse 3, is in widespread use throughout the EU -for instance, in wall paintings in the European Parliament at Strasbourg, on a German five deutschemark note pre-dating the political collective from 1948, on a British postage stamp dated 1984 commemorating the Second European Parliamentary 'Elections' , in the form of an unattractive sculpture located immediately outside the European Council building, on a German ECU coin dated 1992, and on a recent German telephone card.

And everywhere is to be seen EU's ubiquitous circle of 12 stars, which the ignorant comfort themselves by believing that they represent the crown of Mary (symbolism derived from Revelation, Chapter 12 , verse 1.)  In reality, the 12 stars are an attribute of the pagan 'Queen of Heaven', a name given to the mother of Nimrod (meaning, in Chaldean,' the horned one'), the builder and ruler of Babel.  the hideous new circular European Parliament building in Strasbourg is modelled upon Pieter Breughel's famous painting called 'The Tower of Babel', replicated in the Council of Europe's notorious poster. Symbology, which is much too large a subject to be dealt with adequately here, is a crucial component of the occult focus of all such man-orientated collectivist 'New World Social Order' constructions - the EU belong a conspicuous consumer of such neo-pagan symbolism.  But the occult underlying nature and motivation of the EUROPEAN UNION is not an issue that concerns the EU political and policy-making classes, which are measured by economics and ideology...

In any case, not a single politician belonging to or supporting successive British Conservative Government nor (much less surprisingly) the fellow travelling British Fabian Socialist Government (which, given its political orientation, shares the objectives of Lenin's World Revolution but proceeds towards these objectives by stealth, just like the European Union Collective itself...

 

PART 2

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 A PATRIOT AND MAN OF TRUTH.

 

 
earches related to DEATH OF CHRISTOPHER STORY

christopher story books

christopher's story

christopher story disappearance

christopher story new castle

christopher story youtube

christopher story eu corruption

christopher story the eu our enemy

christopher story website

 

PDF] 

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

exopolitics.blogs.com/files/eu-collective.pdf

 

 

Christopher Story Assassination (Edward Harle working under the ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6A_VpB2u_o25 Apr 2011 - 15 min - Uploaded by usellcom
Prominent veteran financial journalist Edward Harle (working under the pen name Christopher ...

H.F.974/1

 

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

OCTOBER-2013

 

    News for daily mail newspaper uk


    The Independent
    Daily Mail reversing Brexit stance 'would be editorial and commercial suicide', Dacre warns new editor
    The Independent - 22 hours ago
    It would be “editorial and commercial suicide" for the Daily Mail to reverse its pro-
    Brexit stance, the newspaper's editor Paul Dacre has ... He is known to be a keen
    supporter of Britain remaining part of the European Union.
 

JUNE 14,2018

 WE HOPE THAT MR MARTIN'S EXAMPLE WILL BE FOLLOWED BY MANY OTHERS WHO WANT THEIR COUNTRY BACK FROM HITLER'S PLANNED AND PLANTED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION WHICH IN REALITY IS AN ELITIST CESS-PIT OF GREED AND EVIL-POWER HUNGRY. 

BEAST! 

IN ITS

TOWER OF BABEL

 ITS SWIFT DEMISE WILL BRING A FRESH BREATH OF LIFE TO THOSE WHO VALUE THEIR FREEDOM  COUNTRY -CUSTOM-CONSTITUTION.]

*

 

'The liberty of a people consists in being governed by laws which they have made themselves, under whatsoever form it be of government; the liberty of a private man is being master of his own time and actions, as far as may consist with the laws of God and his country.'

COWLEY.

*

  'The greatest glory of a free-born people is to transmit that freedom to their children.-

Havard.

*

The true danger is, when liberty is nibbled away, for expedients, and by parts.-

BURKE.

*

[This is what has transpired with our being in the EU since 1973 and is still happening while our extrication from captivity is being  sought under Mrs May's premiership today in June,2018.]

 

H.F.1573/1

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JUNE 14,2018

H F 1573

 

 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 7

AUGUST 2005

NASKH-THE PRINCIPLE OF ABROGATION

IIt is necessary to mention the principle of abrogation, in Arabic, 'Naskh'.  Naskh means that one revelation to Mohammed is completely cancelled by another later revelation.  Muslim scholars do not deny the principle, but instead complain that Christianity uses it.  The latter assertion is untrue, although Christians who appear to believe the New testament has abrogated the Old do not help the cause.  We should be more careful to explain along with Augustine that " the New is in the Old concealed, the Old is in the New revealed." Apart from that, the claims of Biblical contradiction by Muslims do not stand up.  The Bible, Old and New Testaments from beginning to end, is remarkably consistent.

.It was the incident of the so-called 'Satanic Verses', an expression coined by the eminent n19th -century scholar Sir Willium Muir, which established the principle of 'abrogation' under which Mohammed's later revelations supercede his earlier ones in case of any controdiction.  It appears that when Mohammed was trying to convince the people of Mecca about the claims of Allah, he first appeased them by clainming that Allah had said that the daughters of the moon-god could be worshipped and their intercession hoped for (Surah 53:19,20).  This first version said: "Have ye seen Lat and Uzza and another, the third (goddess), Manata/  These are the exalted Gharaniq (exalted or high-flying birds), whose intercession is desired/accepted/approved." (Sura 53:19-20)  The revelation pleased the people of Mecca not least because Allat, Uzza and Manat were important idols to the Ka'aba tourist trade.

However, after some time, Mohammed's own followers became uneasy, and he then claimed to have had further revelation from Allah to the effect that the three goddesses were false and that Satan , not Allah, had given the previous version. Accordingly Mohammed deleted the final sentence and substituted the fopllowing: "What? For you the male sex and for him the female? Behold, such would be indeed a division most unfair! These are nothing but names which ye have devised- ye and your fathers-for which Allah has sent no authority." (Sura 53:21-22)

 The  early Muslim historians Ibn Ishaq both substantiate the story, as does the Quran itself: "Never did We send a messenger or a prophet before thee, but, when he framed a desire, Satan throws in, and; but Allah will cancel anything (vain) that Satan throws in, and Allah will confirm His signs: for Allah is full of knowledge and wisdom" (Sura 22:52). The reference to Satan is why Sir William coined the expression 'Satanic verses'. In another reference to the principle of abrogation, there is no mention of Satan. Instead, the Holy Spirit is said to inspire Mohammed: "When We substitute one revelation for another - and Allah knows best what he reveals (in stages) - they say 'Thou art a forger'; but most of them understand not.  Say, the Holy Spirit has brought the revelation from the Lord in truth, in order to strengthen those who believe, and as a guide and Glad Tidings to Muslims" (Sura 16:101-102).

 The principle of abrogation has implications for any doctrine that Islam is a religion of peace, as we discuss below.  The peaceful verses in the Quran and Hadith nearly all occur early in Mohammed's life, when he was happily married to Khadija and trying to persuade the Meccans by argument.  The bellicose verses occur later, when he was raiding caravans and embarking on military conquest. Virtually the only issue of context in traditional Islam is that Mohammed's later statements take precedence over his early ones.  An observant Muslim following aggressive Jihad can justifiably say that Mohammed's later revelations and actions support him.  If later revelations take precedence over earlier ones, then Islam becomes a way of war.

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/9

 

News for DAILY MAIL-UK pays worst state pension in the developed world

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension in the developed world with a basic payout of Ł122.30 a week

  • The basic payout of Ł122.30 a week is the least generous in the West 
  • Former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get worse 
  • Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found.

The basic payout of Ł122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings – and last night former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get even worse.

Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70, while future payments could be cut even further to avoid needing massive hikes in national insurance, Baroness Altmann said.

 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found

The league table revealing Britain's pension shame was compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which analyses the world's industrialised nations. 

Out of all the countries compared, Britain comes bottom – even behind poorer nations such as Chile, Poland and Mexico.

While the UK's state pension is worth just 29 per cent of average earnings, in France the equivalent figure is 74.5 per cent. 

Germany's state pension is worth 50.5 per cent of average earnings, while in the USA it is 49.1 per cent. 

The most generous state pension in the world is in the Netherlands, where the payments are slightly higher than average earnings.

 

The basic payout of Ł122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings. File photo

Baroness Altmann warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it. 

She said: 'We are one of the world's leading economies, but our support for the oldest in society is not fit for purpose.

'In April 2016, major reforms to the UK state pension were supposed to have made the system affordable for the future, reducing its generosity. Beyond the 2030s, the new state pension will be lower than the old system for most people and the lowest paid, predominantly women, will lose significantly from the new system.

'Despite this, the Government has been advised that the costs of paying state pensions will soar so much over the next 20 years and beyond that further cuts could be required.'

From later this year the state pension age for women will rise from 63 to match men at 65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.

Baroness Ros Altmann (pictured) warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it

The Government's economic forecasters, the Actuary's Department, believes it will become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the 2060s.

This would mean that anyone aged 30 or below now will not get their state pension until they are 70, while those under 20 will have to wait until they are 71.

Baroness Altmann added: 'The Government actuary believes that just funding the UK's exceptionally low state pension will require reducing payments in future or dramatic tax rises. Policymakers face difficult decisions and are also likely to need to increase the state pension age further.'

The former pensions minister called on the Government to do more to address the crisis, including making private pensions more attractive so that more people are willing to pay a portion of their wages into their own fund.

'To avoid burdening younger generations with significant tax rises, it is vital that more is done to boost private pension saving,' she added. 'Auto-enrolment is a good start, but the pensions industry needs to attract more customers to pay more into their pensions.' 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5379521/Britain-pays-retirees-worst-state-pension.html#ixzz56thYQdgc
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[IT IS IRONIC THAT IT WAS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHICH INTRODUCED THE STATE PENSION  OVER A HUNDRED YEARS AGO BY WINSTON CHURCHILL YET AS SHOWN ABOVE IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY BOTH THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES TO THE PRESENT LEVEL AS THE POOREST PENSIONERS OF THE 24 DEVELOPED NATIONS WITH A PERCENTAGE OF THE AVERAGE WAGE OF 29PER CENT-WHEREAS THE TOP NATION NETHERLANDS PAYS 100.6 %. WITH THE CITY MILE BEING BAILED OUT WITH 45 BILLION OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY.]

-A GREEDY SQUARE MILE AND PARSIMONIOUS STATE PENSION YET OUR OVERSEAS AID IS SQUANDERED AND WASTED WITH THE CHARITIES IN THE MAIN GAUGING THEMSELVES WITH HIGH LIVING-AND NOW WE HEAR EVEN PROSTITUTION IS CONSIDERED A PERK OF THE JOB.  THERE APPEARS NO ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT OF CHARITIES TO ENSURE THAT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE FOR THE TRUE NEEDY NOT FOR FUN AND GAMES AND TERRORISTS OR HIGH LIVING OF THOSE RECEIVING THE TAXPAYERS HARD EARNED REMUNERATION WHILE MANY OF THE CONTRIBUTORS ARE IN GREAT PAIN AND MANY DYING WHICH COULD BE GREATLY REDUCED IF CHARITY BEGAN AT HOME.  TO BOAST OF BEING THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO OVERSEAS AID WHILE A GREAT NUMBER OF OUR CITIZENS PARTICULARLY THE POOR AND A NUMBER OF THE ELDERLY  ARE SUFFERING IN ORDER THAT THE TOP OF THE FOREIGN AID LIST IS MAINTAINED.

HOW IS IT THAT THE OTHER 23 NATIONS CAN PROVIDE A HIGHER STATE PENSION? WHAT IS PREVENTING WESTMINSTER FROM BRINGING OUR STATE PENSION UP TO AT LEAST THE AVERAGE OF THOSE ON THE LIST BELOW WHICH CONTAINS MANY NATIONS WHICH CAN HARDLY BE  CONSIDERED RICH COMPARED TO THE UK. IS IT THAT IN THOSE COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE ARE

 PUT FIRST! - NOT LAST?

THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE FEEDING OFF THE PUBLIC PURSE WITH THEIR OBSCENE RATES OF SALARY AND GOLDEN PENSION-POSSIBLY SO LONG AS THEY ARE COMFORTABLE THEY HAVE NO THOUGHT FOR THOSE WHO PAID FOR THEIR LAVISH LIFESTYLE?

PAYOUT AS PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE WAGE
Netherlands   -  100.6%

Portugal        -   94.9%

Italy             -  93.2%

Austria         -  91.8%

Spain             -  81.8%

Denmark        -  80.2%

France            -  74.5%

Belgium          -  66.1%

Finland         -  65%

Czech Republic-60%

Sweden         -  54.9%

Canada          -  53.4%

OECD average=62.9

 

Germany    -    50.5%

USA            -    49.1%

Norway      -    48.8%

Switzerland    -    44.9%

New Zealand   -  43.2%

Australia     -    42.6%

Ireland        -   42.3%

Chile         -     40.1%

Japan           -  40%

Poland       -      38.6%

Mexico         -     29.6%

UK  -  29%

Source-OECD

*

LATEST!

ON THE CONTINUING GROWTH OF THE VANITY PROJECT

FOREIGN AID BUDGET

DAILY MAIL

OCTOBER 30, 2018

Foreign Aid will top Ł14bn a year
 

Britain's foreign Aid budget will soar by Ł230million next year, taking it aboveŁ14billion for the first time

The UK is committed to spend 0.7per cent of its national income on aid.

Britain is one of only seven countries in the world to meet the target.

The foreign aid budget soared by Ł555million to a record Ł13.9billion last year. Our aid budget has more than doubled from the Ł6.4billion spent in 2008 and more than quadrupled from the Ł3.3billion doled out in 2002.

[Why with such vast sums to alleviate the distress around the world are we still seeing adverts on our television screens for such a basic-common and vital need as drinking water?]

 

With billions spread abroad like confetti why are UK state pensions not up with the best in Europe. With a strongly extreme Left Labour Party we would have expected them to have this at the top of their agenda-If it is-they are keeping it a SECRET!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 30, 2018

 

 

H.F.1716

 
 

Extra Ł11billion

Phil COULD have given US

That's the amount

experts say we overspend on foreign aid-the

 Budget so Bloated

the Government has had to

 LIE

about its

RESULTS

*

News for DAILY MAIL EXTRA Ł11 billion Phil COULD have given US by Ian Birrell

OCTOBER 31-2018

 

FRANKLY, it was one of the most patronising lines heard in a Budget speech for an the a long time.

Philip Hammond admitting classroom finances were stretched declared he was announcing a Ł400 million bonus 'to help our schools buy the little extras the need'.

In one glib Budget phrase, the Chancellor managed to infuriate an influential chunk of the electorate while underlining the hollowness of talk on ending austerity.

[While reading this account of the Chancellor's speech one should remember that the Prime Minister Theresa May would be aware of its content and therefore we would expect in agreeance with its message. The need for more police on the beat and prisons is being ignored with so many criminals unable to join their friends in the drug supplied holiday camp atmosphere now common place in our so-called corrective system.

When schools are begging parents to help fund computers and textbooks, this was barely enough to give pupils a new set of pencils-and less than Hammond gave councils to fill in a few pot holes.

Meanwhile, crime is rising, cities are becoming more violent, MPs are pressing for more cash to help protect

PUBLIC SAFETY.

yet hard-pressed police received received

NOTHING

beyond Ł160 million for those fighting terrorism.

Prisons are in terrible crisis-yet the justice department budget is being cut, Social care is crumbling-yet services were given about one-third the amount they need just to cope with existing demand in an ageing and rising population.

Surge

But one slab of spending grew substantially bigger as always- the sums frittered away on

FOREIGN AID

which continued their inexorable surge with an extra Ł230million set to be sprayed around the world next year.

So the total given away by Britain will top

Ł14 BILLION

-enough to fund

2,168 nurses

for every English  hospital trust

90 teachers

for for every secondary school or to build enough social housing for a new city the size of

LIVERPOOL...

TO BE CONTINUED

Absurd

Many MPs know the great British aid giveaway is crazy and that the arguments for aid contain more holes than a colander. They can see how most rival nations simply ignore the flawed United Nations-set 0.7 per cent GDP target

Even before Trump, the US was giving less athan0.2per cent. None of the other major economies in the G7-Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan-are hitting the UN target that prioritises spending over need. It is absurd that Britain doled out nearly Ł1 for every Ł6 spent on aid by these wealthiest nations.

One former foreign office minister told me the real level of British aid based on need and effective spending should be 'at most

'Ł3BILLION.

Just think how another Ł11BILLION could help the

POLICE

SCHOOLS

or the

SOCIAL CARE SYSTEM.

Instead the Government has decided British schools can struggle because they must keep on offering 'little extras' for

 CORRUPT DICTATORS.

CONFERENCE ORGANISERS

and

FAT-CAT CHARITY CHIEFS.

[REMEMBER! THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY IS JUDGED ON ITS ACTIONS AND WHEN ONE SEES HOW MATTERS LIKE THE BLOATED AND WASTEFUL FOREIGN AID AND THE NEED OF 'BOBBIES ON THE BEAT' AND MORE PRISONS ARE IGNORED THEN ONE CANNOT EXPECT SUCH AN EQUALLY IMPORTANT ISSUE SUCH AS BREXIT  TO BE HANDLED EFFECTIVELY AND EXPEDITIOUSLY -WHICH IS WHAT HAS HAPPENED AT THE PRESENT TIME.]

FULL ARTICLE

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 31-2018

H.F.1741

 

 
 

Don't fool yourself-the Ł75 million fat cat may have gone, but the GREED of CITY BOSSES is as RAPACIOUS as

EVER

 

By Alex Brummer

                                    City Editor

NOVEMBER 8, 2018

 

NOVEMBER 8, 2018

 

THE departure of Britain's fattest of cats as chief executive of Persimmon is unlikely to be a cause of weeping and wailing across the country.

Jeff Fairburn's Ł75 million pay package-reduced from a staggering Ł103million after pressure from angry investors-has been an embarrassment not just to the house-building industry and to institutionakl shareholders determined to clamp down on unalloyed greed in the boardroom.

It is also a blow to a Tory Government trying to defend capitalism as a fair system in the face of an assault on it from Labour's Maxist Shadow Chancellor John McDonell

Fairburn's resignation is in many ways a signal moment in the battle by successive  governments and City grandees to bring a halt to the outlandish behaviour of too many FTSE 100 chief executives.

REVOLTS...

SHODDY...

FAILED

Public companies are required by City enforcers to set up remuneration committees with independent chairmen, whose job is to

CONTROL BOSSES' PAY

But they have failed miserably in recent years with the average pay of FTSE 100 chief executives reaching Ł5.6million...

By getting rid of Jeff Fairburn they may have lanced a boil but unless corporate Britain becomes more responsive to public concerns over rapacious behaviour and egregious executive pay capitalism in Britain is making itself a prime target for Jeremy Corbyn's socialist creed.

 

 

NOVEMBER 8, 2018

H.F.1742

 

 
 

 

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

HOME

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM? THAT IS YOUR CHOICE

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-June 27,2008]

DEMOCRACY and freedom. It is a fine sounding phrase-rarely off the lips of President Bush as he blunders around the Middle East.

Why do we readily accept that democracy and freedom are natural partners? There is scant historical evidence for it. Often it is a case of

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM: even DEMOCRACY versus FREEDOM.

Consider two examples.  the United States is the only country to have banned alcohol by public demand. Contrast this with Hong Kong. Until shortly before being handed back by

BRITAIN to BEIJING

 it had

NO DEMOCRACY

at all: It was ruled by a colonial governor. Yet enjoyed enviable freedom with one of the least intrusive governments -and flourished wonderfully.

Our own experience also has much to tell us.

BEING A DEMOCRACY HAS NOT PROMOTED PERSONAL LIBERTY.

QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

More than

3000

 NEW OFFENCES

have been created since 1997, and officialdom revels in nearly

300 POWERS OF ENTRY.

Much of this is due to the

EUROPEAN UNION

whose

DIRECTIVES

are rarely scrutinised, let alone debated , by our supposedly democratic representatives.

WHAT we may SAY, WRITE or DO, or whom WE EMPLOY has been increasingly limited. The Government has passed legislation which can make assisting your son's football team

AN OFFENCE.

Another side of our

'democracy'

demonstrates painfully how the public will is constantly flouted. Take the brazen example of voters being

PROMISED REFERENDUM

on

CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

resulting from the

LISBON TREATY

The unscrupulous machinery of government has been deployed to

FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC WILL.

I am not making a party point.

FOR OVER 40 YEARS, GOVERNMENTS OF BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN RESISTING AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC DEMAND FOR CURBS ON

IMMIGRATION.

especially from the

NEW COMMONWEALTH.

 While successive governments have made a show of meeting public demand, they have, quite consciously

REFUSED TO ADDRESS IT

throwing occasional tit-bits to the voters in the hope

THAT THIS WILL KEEP THEM QUIET.

Consider, also, the strong public demand for

CRIMINALS TO BE PROPERLY PUNISHED.

Successive governments, including Mrs Thatcher's have come under the sway of the

'PRISON REFORM'

people -with the result that

CRIMINALS RECEIVE VERY MODEST SENTENCES.

What is more, if they serve a sentence at all, it is in the softest conditions.

IF LYING ON YOUR BED AND WATCHING TV FOR A FEW MONTHS IS THE WORST THAT THE LAW WILL INFLICT

(and that's if you are even caught)

then

CRIME IS WORTH THE RISK

AND

PUBLIC OUTRAGE IS IGNORED.

The explanation is quite logical. Politicians are typically driven by

TWO THINGS.

THE FIRST is the PURSUIT OF POWER

the most exciting thing in the world, or even some say, the first.  If this urge is not there when they start their political careers

THEN IT SOON TAKES OVER.

THEIR SECOND MOTIVATION -to give our politicians their due - is the DESIRE FOR REFORM, IMPROVE the condition of the PEOPLE.

But the catch here is that most politicians

 THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE FAR BETTER THAN THEMSELVES.

THEY FORM AN ELITE

WHICH LISTENS TO

OTHER ELITES

Or perhaps, since the word elite sounds flattering, we should say

THEY FORM A CASTE.

 

Politicians do not wake each morning wondering whether they are meeting the public will.  They turn to the media to learn what is said about them in newspapers and on the radio by other members of the

NATIONAL ELITE

- the selectorate, the clattering classes, the scribblers, the intellectually fashionable, call them what you will.

 

For elites to be out of touch is not unusual, even inevitable. The desire to be 'in' with the 'right' people is common with politicians; their weakness is for approval (and fame).

Of course, there is one moment when public opinion cannot be ignored -and that is at an

ELECTION

As Rousseau observed, voters are truly free

ONLY

 ON

ELECTION DAY.

But , by then, all the issues are jumbled up, and the voter finds himself choosing between

TWO COMPLEX and CONFUSING MENUS.

And while it is clearly advantageous for a party to offer the public

WHAT IT WANTS, the fact that both main parties say MUCH THE SAME THING..

-and make similar insincere

PROMISES

makes a mockery of any claim to be driven by

PUBLIC WILL.

 

BUT  the ALTERNATIVE to our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM politicians say in horror, would be GOVERNMENT by REFERENDUMS. With 'horror' because it would take power from THEM and give it to THE PEOPLE.

BUT WHY NOT?

The Swiss have made a suburb success of it. Referendums are required on national and local issues if enough voters petition for them and they often do. As a result, the Federal Government, like  the local CANTON administrations, proceeds with CAUTION in case its plans are overturned by a PUBLIC VOTE. . .

To acknowledge that our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, which has developed over the centuries, NO LONGER WORKS -MAY BE PAINFUL. But if you put that to a REFERENDUM,

MOST VOTERS WOULD HEARTILY AGREE.

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

 *

HOME

[brought forward from June-2008

AUGUST-2008

*

[ 'IN JANUARY 2018 we can look back over 10 years and see that the situation with regard to many matters mentioned above has got progressively WORSE! Whether it is IMMIGRATION-POLICING-LAWS...The only GOOD NEWS is that we are only just over a year away from leaving the monstrous soon to be containment camp know as the EU SUPER-STATE a plan of ADOLF-HITLER in 1940 for GERMANY to dominate Europe in the PEACE .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[brought forward from June-2008

H.F.1449

 
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 14/1

AUGUST 2005

ORIGINS OF MODERN MUSLIM TERRIORISM

Islamic terrorism in its present form can trace its roots to the foundation of Muslim Brotherhood in 1928 in Egypt.  Previous historical events were Britain's promise of a Arab homeland to T.E Lawrence's Arab army in 1916-17, the way Britain and France were meanwhile dividing up the middle east in the Sykes Picot Agreement of 1916., which meant the promise given to and by Lawrence was worthless, the defeat of the Ottoman Empire by Allenby in 1917, the end of the Ottoman Califate when the modern state of Turkey was established in 1924, the setting up of the Turkish Grand National Assemble or Parliament and British occupation of Egypt.  These all contributed to the establishment of the Muslim Brotherhood.  In the 1940's one of its leaders, the Egyptian literary critic Sayd Qutb, spent two years in America, an experience which turned him solidly against the West in general. Before his execution in Egypt in 1966, he wrote a book entitled 'Milestone' which is available on the internet at YoungMuslims Canada.

It was Qutb who developed the modern ideas of Jihad, and writing about Sura 9:111 and Allah's bargain fo the Shahid, he chids those who will not accept it: "The deal fills us with awe. Yet those who are claiming to be Muslims everywhere...are sitting idle, unwilling to strive hard in order to establish the fundamental truth of Allah's Lordship on earth, or to remove the tyranny which usurps the qualities of Lordship over human life on earth [ie non-islamic governments].  They are unwilling to fight, kill and be killed in Allah's cause."Outb reminds jihadists that they should rejoice in the bargain, just as the Quran says the followers of Mohammed did: "Ye did indeed wish for death before ye met him" (Sura 3:143). He asserts that they should hope for death in battle, and encourages modern mujihadeen to seek death in nthe worldwide jihad- or 'struggle' - to impose Islam and eliminate its enemies.

According to the NubaSurvival website, Qurb, the Indo-Pakistani radical Abu al-Ala Al Mawdudi and the Ayatollah Imam Khomeini were the three prime sources of modern militant Islamic theocratic ideology. Mawdudi saw Western morality as barbarian, and argued for the imposition of an Islamic state. Khomeini told a conference of Islamic clerics in 1981: "Quran says kill, imprison. Why are you only clinging to the part that talks of mercy?" He said: Those who know nothing bof Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those {who] say [this] are witless. Islam says: Kill al the unbelievers just as they would kill you all!... Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword."

Quarb saw unrestrained capitalism, individualism, promiscuity, decadence and globalisation as threats to Islam, rather as we might see them as threats to Christianity.  His answer was to revive the old ideas of expansion, and to propose, contrary to Arab nationalists, that the homeland Muslims should fight for not a piece of land but the whole Dar-al-islam. It followed that any part of the world which hampered the spread of Islam or failed to operate Sha'ria was Dar-al-Harb.  Another member of the Muslim Brotherhood was Abdullah Azzam, a Palestinian university professor who became the mentor of Osama Bin Laden.  Bin Laden himself is said to be or have been a members of the Muslim Brotherhood, but with so many other connections to the Brotherhood, it hardly matters.

So islamic terrorism is relatively new, but the intellectuals who have developed it have built it on foundations which are solidly in the Quran and Hadith.

 

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/14/1

 

 
("IN MY VIEW BOTH THE BURKA AND NIQAB SHOULD BE

 

BANNED

 

 AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN FRANCE AND BELGIUM AND ELSEWHERE."

by

Dr Taj Hargey-

Director of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, and Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation)

Diversity should not trump right to a happy foster home | Daily Mail ...

 

...

Tuesday, August 29,2017

An

An obsession with diversity should NEVER trump a child's right to a happy foster home

The social services industry prides itself on its cultural sensitivity, especially when it comes to fostering and adoption.

Respect for background and identity is meant to be central to the process of finding a home for a vulnerable child.

But that ideal has utterly broken down in the case that emerged yesterday, in which it was reported that a five-year-old girl from a white Christian family was placed by Tower Hamlets council in London in two successive Muslim households.

Much to the child’s distress — as logged in confidential local authority reports seen by The Times — neither family seems to have shown much respect or understanding for her upbringing or faith.

One supervisor is reported to have described her sobbing as she begged not to go back to the carer’s home because

‘they don’t speak English’.

A necklace with a crucifix was apparently taken from her and she was told to learn Arabic. She was also told that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’. 

When, on a visit to her birth mother, she was given her favourite dish of spaghetti carbonara to take back to her foster home, she was banned from eating it because it contained bacon.

Compounding what must have been this child’s sense of alienation, her first carer, with whom she spent four months, is said to have worn the niqab — a face veil — when outside the family home.

In the second and current placement, her carer wore the all-enveloping burka and fully concealed her face in public.

(In my view, this is a garment that should have no place in British society. Both the burka and niqab should be banned, as they have been in France, Belgium and elsewhere.)

It is absolutely right that MPs demand an inquiry into this appalling example of forced cultural convergence.

Social services bosses love to prattle about human rights, but the treatment of this little girl represents a denial of her most basic rights.

If the reports are correct, she has been plunged into an unfamiliar environment of language, creed and dress code, where her carers make plain they have little time for her family or heritage.

To a young child, of course, such words mean little — but we can imagine her confusion and anxiety at the apparent hostility towards her background, the dismissive description of its women and its ancient festivals.

And let’s not forget that she is likely to have been traumatised already by difficult family circumstances.

This is yet another case in which the dogma of liberal political correctness appears to have triumphed over common sense. How else could one even begin to rationalise placing this child in strict Muslim households?

Here is what should happen now. The girl should be removed immediately from her current foster parents to a more appropriate placement. Then the social workers and their line managers who made this insensitive decision should be named, shamed and dismissed.

Alienation...

*

Poisonous...

*

Tolerance...

*

Full article

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4831638/Diversity-not-trump-right-happy-foster-home.html#ixzz4r8xRffzN
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT -NOT MULTICULTURE

*

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

*

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

*

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

 

H.F.1289

 

 
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 14

/Of 28 sections.

AUGUST 2005

A WORLDWIDE ISLAMIC STATE

 The idea of the Khilafah is strong in Islam, and is the driving force of numerous organisations and websites, such as www.hizh.org.uk, www.Hizb-ut-Tahrir.org, www.Khilafah.com, www.ummah.org.uk, and the recently pulled www.islamic-sata.org and www.ghurabaa.co.uk.  Both Communism and Islam have as their goal the establishment of a global state embodying their ideals.  In contrast, Christianity  from its Jewish roots teaches a division of nations (Gen 10:5; Acts 17:6)m in part to, restrain the ambitions of sinful men (Gen 11:4-9, Psalm 2).  It is of course true that in Christianity we find the concept of a millennnial kingdom of peace and justice.  Jesus Christ establishes His reign, ruling with an iron rod, and his enemies become his footstool (Psalm 2, Psalm 110;  Mark 12:36; Heb 1:13).

It may be argued that the Millennium is a spiritual event, unlike Islamic rule, which is temporal, but that is not the whole story.  Christians should be prepared to say that the establishment of the righteous laws of God in any commonwealth or nation would be a good thing. The judicial laws revealed by God to the Patriarchs, Moses and the Prophets were not to be kept solely by Israel, but were truly intended as a model for all nations: "And what nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgments so righteous as all this law, which I set before you this day?" (Deut 4:8) "He shall not fail nor be discouraged, till he have set judgment in the earth; and the isles shall wait for his law" (Isa 42:4).

Obviously, a Muslim should and will be enthusiastic for Islamic Law, Sha'ria, as Christians are (or should be) for Christian law, and of course much more inclined to work for its establishment by force. It is difficult to find Muslims who will argue that we live in a liberal democracy and that secular humanism should form the basis for our law-making, as is sadly prevalent in some Christian circles.

There are observant Muslims, and non observant Muslims, but a moderate Muslim is hard to find and even a non-observant Muslim will still believe at some level in the Khilafah, defend the Ummah and revere a martyr in the cause of jihad.

It also must be asked, if those who terrorised Nissar Hussain in Bradford were not ordinary Muslims, what were they? Or the Nigerian Muslims terrorising Christians? Or those at Pretoria University who objected to the Frontline mission? If they were ordinary Muslims, the level of tolerance in Islam is set extremely low.  Observant Muslims believe the Quran, and they believe that Sha'ria is wholly good, and is destined to be enforced worldwide in a Khilafah.  That is what the Quran says and it is supposed to be the culmination of and successor to the Bible. So how does Sha'ria compare to the Biblical laws of God?

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

H.F.1711/9

 

 

 

 ENGLAND

A MONOCULTURE

- TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUITY

-NOT MULTICULTURAL.

*

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH

Wednesday, June 7,2006

*

 Britain is an old country and our ways deserve respect.

by

Simon Heffer

 There are few things more enjoyable than when a Leftie admits, or pretends to admit, he was wrong.

 We saw it a year ago when Trevor Phillips, commissioner-in-chief of the Commission for racial Equality, said that

MULTICULTURLISM

 -had not been a huge success, and that those from other cultures who came here were better off learning to be British.

 

[‘When in Rome do as the Romans do’ so those fortunate to find a home in England need to concentrate on English culture and those who go West or North of the border will soon get to know how to integrate with the local scene.

We have a Queen of England -We have a Church of England- just about so long as the Man of many Faiths does not get his way. We have English Law -just about, and so many things of English origin and practice that we would be repeating ourselves to declare an interest.

 

[The term British we leave as an overall label to embrace England as a partner with the other sister nation states in our island home and we hope one day our neighbours will come to the realisation that their interests should also include the interests of the People of England who by the way are getting quite fed-up with the way they pay the lion’s share of their increased benefits without the right to have their solely English issues raised in OUR House of Commons the concern of English MPs ONLY. ]

  

To Continue:

 I think [Trevor Phillips] he was sincere. I am less sure about Gordon Brown, who bores about Britishness almost daily.

It is a sort of thing that allows a socialist such as Mr Brown to fake some point of contact with conservative-minded patriots.

 It is also his way of trying to hide the fact that his own party’s policies have split up the United Kingdom and made his position, as a Scot sitting for a Scottish seat who wants to be Prime Minister mostly of

ENGLAND

-somewhat precarious.

Not all the Left has, however twigged that

MULTICULTURLISM

-is rather last century.

Someone of whom I hoped we had heard the last, the former

Archbishop of Canterbury-Lord Carey

-made a predictable intervention in this debate from beyond the grave last weekend.

 

He proclaimed that the Coronation of our next monarch must be an “interfaith” event. The ceremony must, he added, “have “very significant changes”, so that it is “inclusive” of other religions in Britain.

 

Lord Carey clearly has in mind what Private Eye would term a “Rocky Horror” coronation service. Never mind your archbishops, or even your Christians, your imams, your rabbis, ayatollahs, your assorted holy men and other diverse priests, layers -on-hands and speakers-in-tongues: in accordance with the professions of religious belief on the 2001 census forms, I expect to see a few Jedi knights in the sanctuary, while devotees of Ras Tafari smoke ganja at the high altar. And, as one of the realm’s noisiest atheists, I hope for a part in the proceedings, too, that I might feel “included”.

 

Having long regarded the Church of England as many people regard EastEnders, I have steeled myself not to intrude in its private grief, but to lament the largely self-inflicted decline of this great institution. Though it has, to my great spiritual regret, nothing to offer me personally, I can appreciate not merely the potential it has to succour and strengthen millions of believers, but also its role in

OUR CULTURE

OUR CONSTITUTION

OUR NATION

 

At the heart of this remains the great legacy of the

 

REFORMATION

  -that the

Monarch

 

is Supreme Governor

of the

Church of England.

-which is the Established Church of this Realm.

 

As the 37th of the 39 Articles (“on the Civil Magistrates”) puts it,

 

“the Bishop of Rome hath no jurisdiction in this

Realm of England.

 

Quite right: and were we to update that Article as we fetishistically seek to update everything else, we might also add that no mullahs, rabbi, Jedi or Rastafarian has any jurisdiction here.

 

However, intrude into the Church’s grief we now must: for Lord Carey’s successor on the throne of St Augustine, Dr Rowan Williams, who in many regards seems even more to inhabit the wilder shores of the theology than Lord Carey, is having none of this nonsense.

 

He has picked up on the threat issued by our probable next monarch, the Prince of Wales, in 1994 about how (in that very “ last century” spirit) the Prince wanted to be

 

“Defender of Faiths”

 

Some of us boring old pedants saw the stupidity of this at the time. It is not in a King’s job description to defend “faiths”, and cannot be unless the whole constitutional arrangement that binds Church and State is unravelled.

 

More to the point, the notion of defending “faiths” imposes the King on secular legal matters -for the practising of faiths other than that of the Established Church is defended in fact by various Acts of Parliament- in which he has no place.

 

Although one has never been entirely sure that the Prince of Wales has fully grasped this point, he is NOT a politician; and few things these days are more political than the right to profess assorted faiths that NOT traditional to this country.

 

Dr Williams said of the Prince in 2003 that “Unless something really radical happens with the Constitution, he is, like it or not,

 

Defender of the Faith

 

-and he has a relationship with the Christian Church of a kind that he does not have with other communities”.

 

THAT IS SELF-EVIDENTLY THE CASE.

 

Of course, were our Queen to emulate her late mother (and I fervently hope she does) there will be no Coronation for another 20 or so years.

 

Perhaps the needless vandalism of

 

OUR CONSTITUTION

 

-will have been completed by then.

 

Perhaps there will be a different heir to the throne [Prince William]. Perhaps the moon will be made of green cheese. Until such times as these things happen, Dr William’s view must prevail, and his predecessor would be best advised to keep his bizarre views to himself.

 

For the Coronation Service, religious though it be, is about more than religion.

 

When the time comes, only a relatively small section of our people (and by no means just Christians, let alone Anglicans) would savour the religious significance of the EVENT.

 

For the rest of us, the symbolism will transcend the religious. Some will see the CONSTITUTIONAL point, and realise how the traditional form of words and practices provides us with a Monarch who will carry on business as usual.

 

For most of those watching the their plasma screens, however, the day will be about a sense of familiar NATIONAL IDENTITY

-embodied, however much or little they realise it, in the person of the

NEW SOVEREIGN.

 

Now, Lord Carey might argue that altering the service to “include” Shias, Sunnis, Hindus, Zoroastrians and Jehovah’s Witnesses would not altar that symbolism:

 

But he would be WRONG!

 

It is not only that too many of our people have seen newsreels of the last Coronation 53 years ago, and therefore have a fixed cultural idea of what it is supposed to be. It is about the NEW MONARCH, and the CEREMONY of CORONATION of which he is the heart, fitting in with what his people understand, implicitly or explicitly, about THEMSELVES, and the NATION of which they are A PART.

 

It is Trevor Philip’s point writ large: -it is about a country being given its cultural stability partly by

HISTORY and TRADITION

-and about people buying into that when they choose to become A PART of the COUNTRY.

 

That is what inclusiveness means: It is how countries as diverse as France and America both do things. It is about having a template of Frenchness or American-ness, and welcoming people into that civilisation and THOSE humane values by asking them to participate in them. We still, despite the attempts of such VANDALS as LORD CAREY, have a core CULTURE in this COUNTRY.

 

Christianity and the expectation that Christianity will, for historic reasons prevail and be accepted as prevalent, are central to that CULTURE. And a few events in the nation’s life symbolise such an understanding more than the traditional coronation service.

 

The next CORONATION will be a formal renewal of

OUR WAY OF LIFE

And

OUR VALUES.

 

It will formally recognise not only the legitimacy of the MONARCH in the eyes of GOD and the BRITISH constitution, but also of the identification of the vast majority of his subjects with the process of doing so. For that reason above all others it must be clear, comprehensible and in keeping with public expectations of such an event.

 

WE ARE NOT A MULTICUTURAL SOCIETY

 

WE ARE A MONOCULTURAL ONE -TOLERANT OF OTHER CULTURES.

 

AND WHOSE CLEAR IDENTITY IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE PEOPLE - IF NOT BY THEIR LEADERS.

 

WE ARE AN OLD COUNTRY WITH A STRONG SENSE OF CONTINUITY.

 

AND ANYONE WHO TRIFLES WITH SUCH MANIFESTATIONS OF OUR ANTIQUITY AND STABILITY DOES SO AT HIS PERIL.

 

* * *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWS

*

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY HENRY LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FRANCE

MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF NAPLES

1844

 

GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

 

CONSTITUTION OF ENGLAND

 

Before we commence with extracts from the above we need to investigate the term British and what it meant in 1908 and the confusion that has arisen since the devolution has occurred in Scotland in their Scottish Parliament and the Assembly in Wales.

 

To assist us in this regard we have the brilliant Constitutional History of England (1908) by the learned Professor F.W Maitland an authority of world renown.

*

 

Nationality and Domicile

 

In speaking of king and parliament we are no longer speaking of what in strictness of language are merely English institutions; the parliament represents the United Kingdom, and king and parliament have supreme legislative power over territories which lie in every quarter of the globe.

 

Of this parliament we must speak.

 

Below it there are many institutions, some of which are specifically Scottish, Irish, Canadian, Australian, Indian; for example the judicial systems of England, Ireland and Scotland are distinct from each other, though at the supreme point they unite in the House of Lords.

 

It is of great importance to distinguish those institutions which like the kingship and the parliament are (we can hardly avoid the term) imperial institutions, from those which like the

HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

-are specifically English, and I strongly advise you not to use the words England and English when you mean what is larger than England and more than English.

 

When we have dealt with the institutions, which have power over all the British dominions, we shall, being Englishmen in an English university, deal with some purely English institutions the High Court of Justice, not with the Scottish Court of Sessions -but let us keep this distinction firmly in our minds; if we are Englishmen, we are subjects of a sovereign whose power extends over millions and millions of men who are not English. [1908]

 

Let me illustrate this by a further remark. There are two conceptions, which are of great importance to students of international law:

 

-the one nationality, the other domicile.

 

Now there is no such thing as English nationality, and there is no such thing as British domicile. [1908]

The Englishman, the Scot, the Irishman, the Canadian, and the Australian -all of these have a nationality in common. [1908]

 

If there be a war between the United Kingdom and a foreign power, say France, all of them are enemies of the French, any of them who side with the French are traitors. [1908]

 

But there is no such thing as British domicile -

Because there is no one system of private law common to all the British dominions; a man is domiciled in England or Scotland or New Zealand, and to a very large extent the law under which he lives varies with his place of domicile.

 

If I abandon my English domicile, and become domiciled in Scotland, this will have important legal results for me, but my nationality remains what it was. So by England let us mean England, a land, which consists of fifty-two counties [1908]

 

We have included the above extracts from

The

 

CONSTITUTIONAL

HISTORY

OF

ENGLAND

 

by

 

F.W MAITLAND [1908]

 

-to show the destruction of the British Constitution over the past 75 years and particularly in the last nine years under Blairdom has shown that the title of British has led to much confusion as the foundation of that concept has now been undermined with the Englishman having to pretend that there is in fact a British Constitution when we have a Scottish Parliament and an Assembly in Wales no doubt in time to be a parliament.

 

The term BRITISH should ONLY be used when it concerns ALL the nation States within our island home -such as with Defence as virtually all other matters have been handed over to the other national bodies in Scotland and Wales.

 

Let us hear no more about Britishness but more about Englishness-Scottishness and Welshness because that is the situation we find ourselves in 2006.

To return to Britishness in our shared island there needs to be a return of an

English Parliament.

Only then will the term British regain its true meaning.

To continue:

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY

LORD BROUGHAM

*

CHAPTER VIII

 THE National Resistance was not only, n point of Historical fact, the cause of the Revolutionary settlement, it was the main foundation of that settlement; the structure of the government was made to rest upon the people’s

Right of Resistance

[Even in 2006]

-as upon its cornerstone; and it is of incalculable importance that this never should be lost sight of.

But it is of equal importance that we should ever bear in mind how essential to the preservation of the CONSTITUTION, thus established and secured, this principle of RESISTANCE is; how necessary both for the governors and the governed it ever must be to regard the recourse to that extremity as always possible -an extremity, no doubt, and to be cautiously embraced as such, but still a remedy within the people’s reach; a protection to which they CAN and WILL resort as often as their rulers make such a recourse necessary for self-defence.

 

[DO YOU UNDERSTAND

TONY BLAIR?]

 

The whole history of the CONSTITUTION, which we have been occupied, in tracing from the earliest ages, abounds with proofs how easily absolute power may be exercised, [AS in 2006] and the RIGHTS of the people best secured by LAW be trampled upon, while the theory of a FREE GOVERNMENT remains unaltered. [AS in 2006] and all institutions framed for the CONTROL of the EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT [AS in 2006] and all the LAWS designed for the protection of the subject, continue as entire as at the moment they were first founded by the struggles of the PEOPLE, and cemented by their labour or their BLOOD.

The thirty renewals of

MAGNA CARTA

-the constant and almost unresisted invasions of the exclusive right of PARLIAMENT to levy taxes by the Plantagenet Princes of the House of York -the base subserviency of the PARLIAMENT [AS in 2006] to the vindictive measures of parties, alternately successful, during the troubled times of the Lancaster line -the yet more vile submission to the same body to the first Tudors -their suffering arbitrary power to regain its pitch after it had been extirpated in the seventeenth century -the frightful lesson of distrust in Parliament, and in the institutions and all laws , taught by the ease with which Charles II [AS with Tony Blair in 2006] governed almost without control, at the very period fixed upon by our best writers as tat of the Constitution’s greatest theoretical perfection-and , above all, the very narrow escape which this country had of absolute Monarchy, by the happy accident of James II choosing to assail the religion of the people before he had destroyed their liberty, and making the Church his enemy instead of using it as his willing and potent ally against all civil liberty- these are such passages in the history of our government as may well teach us to distrust all mere STATUTORY securities; to remember that JUDGES, PARLIAMENTS, and MINISTERS, as well as KINGS, are frail men, the sport of sordid propensities, or vain fears, or factious passions; and that the people never can be safe without a constant determination to resist unto death as often as their

RIGHTS are INVADED.

The main security which our institutions afford, and that which will always render a recourse to the

RIGHT of RESISTANCE

 

-less needful, must ever consist in the pure constitution of Parliament-the extended basis of our popular representation. This is the great improvement, which it had received since the REVOLUTION…

 

In 1831 and 1832 the Parliamentary constitution was placed upon a wider and more secure basis; and although much yet remains to be accomplished before we can justly affirm that all classes are duly represented in Parliament, assuredly we are no longer exposed to the same risks of seeing LIBERTIES destroyed, and the same hazard of having to protect ourselves by resistance; nor can any one now deny that the democratic principle enters largely into the frame of our MIXED MONARCHY

 

This great change is much more than sufficient to counterbalance all the increase of influence that as been acquired by the CROWN since the REVOLUTION, including the vexations which unavoidably attend the administration of our fiscal laws for the collection and protection of a vast revenue, and the creation of a numerous and important body. Always averse to struggle under the worst oppressions, and always the sure ally of power- I mean the vast and wealthy body of public creditors, whose security is bound up with the existing order of things.

 

The great virtue of the

 

CONSTITUTION of ENGLAND

 

-is the purity in which it recognises and establishes the fundamental principle of all mixed governments; that the supreme power of the STATE being invested in SEVERAL BODIES, the consent of each is required to the performance of any legislative act; and that no change can be made in the laws, nor any addition to them nor any act done affecting their lives, liberties, or property of the people, without the full and deliberate assent of each of the ruling powers.

 

The ruling powers are three:

 

The Sovereign

 

The Lords

 

The Commons

 

-of whom the Lords represent themselves only, unless in so far as the Prelates may be supposed to represent the Clergy; and the Scotch Peers to represent, by election of parliament, and the Irish, by election for life, the peerages of Scotland and Ireland respectively; the Commons represent their constituents, by whom they are for each parliament elected [1844].

If it should seem an exception to the fundamental principle now laid down that the CROWN has the power of making

 

PEACE and WAR

 

-and of entering into treaties with foreign states, operations, by which the welfare of the subject may be most materially affected, it is equally true that NO WAR can possibly be continued without the support of both Houses of Parliament; and that no peace concluded, or treaty made, can be binding, so as to affect any interests of the people, without subsequent approval in PARLIAMENT.

 

The Sovereign, [PRIME MINISTER] therefore, never can enter into any war, or pursue negotiation, without a positive certainty that the Parliament will assent to it and support the necessary operations, whether of hostility or of commercial regulations; and thus the only effect of this prerogative is to give due vigour and authority to the action of the Government in its intercourse with foreign powers and its care of the

NATIONAL DEFENCE.

 

[In 2005] the CROWN or in other words the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom [no longer united -by the way] signed twenty-five times the TREATY of ROME for Britain to become part of a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

-without the consent of the electorate who had been promised a

 

REFERENDUM

 

- on the constitutional issue raised but no date was given to enable the People to decide their future in EUROPE.

 

So we had Tony Blair signing a Treaty which had not received the consent of Parliament because of the obvious condition of a Referendum had not been satisfied.

IF THIS IS NOT TYRANNY

 

WHAT IS?

 

The following extracts are from the

 

PREFACE

 

of the

BRITISH CONSTITUION

 

By

 

HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

[1844]

 

GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

 

It is quite impossible to understand accurately the principles of that Constitution without studying its history in all times; and an attentive examination of that history is fruitful of most important practical truths for the government of men’s conduct in the present day.

 

It shows that is country alone of the European states has in all ages possessed the great benefit of a Legislature distinct from the Executive Government, the

 

Sovereign of ENGLAND

 

-never having at any period had the power of making general laws. But it likewise shows most clearly that this or any other institution

can give little security to the liberties of the people, - little obstruction to the maladministration of public affairs.

 

The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.

 

It may be very wrong to say that forms of Government are of no importance, and that the best system is the one best administered.

 

But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of free institutions is there enabling men to obtain wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those that live under it to watch the conduct of their rulers, aiding them when right, checking them when wrong; and, above all, that no

 

CONSTITUTION

 

-however excellent, can supersede the necessity or dispense with the duty of constant vigilance.

 *

[In every Revolution there are those that decide on the crucial issues but there are many who leave the contesting to others but are themselves pleased to obtain the fruit of the victory without the toil and hardship that brings it about.

 

It is the same today in JUNE 2006 as it was in the civil war of the seventeenth century when those passionate about their country and claimed their just rights and liberties while parts of England were a neutral zone.]

WHICH PARTY ARE YOU?

ARE YOU A LOOKER ON?

ARE YOU CONTESTING?

 

* * *

 

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

*

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

*

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

MULTICULTURLISM

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

JUNE/06

 

 

H.F.1472--BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE 2006

 

 
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 16

/Of 28 sections

AUGUST 2005

ISLAMIC AMBITION

In his 1934 book 'Sex and Culture the anthropologist J.D.Unwin studied 86 different cultures from a period of 5,000 years and concluded that chastity and fidelity in "strict marital monogamy" were central to any strong, healthy society. Indeed, no society flourished for more than three generations without it. Britain is now nearing the end of the second generation. Once the third generation was out, the society died, usually by being taken over by another, monogamous people. "I know of no exceptions to this rule.

Could the fiercely monogamous Islam be the culture that takes over from the secular humanist culture of the Western world? Will we see  the establishment of an Islamic State in Britain and the imposition of Sha'ria. This author believes the British Establishment would not  allow such a thing to happen, jealous  as its leaders are of their grip on power.  However, events have a habit  of taking politicians by surprise, and there is no lack  of ambition amongst Muslims.  It is only necessary to look at tower hamlets  to see what happens when 'ordinary Muslims' take power.

Tower Hamlets [in 2005] is 36% Muslim, and yet Muslims are in a majority in the ruling Labour group and on the Council as a whole, and the Mayor is Muslim.  Presumably the Muslim councillors can be regarded as 'ordinary Muslims.' Once in power, they attempted to have  wards renamed to eliminate references to Christianity (Trinity ward disappeared ), and a proposal to twin the London Borough with Jenin, a Palestinian hot-bed of terrorism, was narrowly averted.

The Borough is able to use the funding it allocates to advance Islamic programmes and cultural societies, force the closure of Christian schools and ensure that Muslims control everything for which the local authority has responsibility.

There are 14 Muslim community organisations in partnership with Tower Hamlets Borough Council. In addition to the 2 mosques, the Ahmadiya Muslim Association has as its purpose:

Practising Islamic knowledge... to upkeep a moral society', the junior Muslim Circle provided' religious education' to 8-14 year olds, a Madrassah has 'mother tongue [Arabic?] and study support classes', and the Shahjalal Centre is there  to 'meet the needs of the Muslim community' with 'prayer space' and 'education for children'

Couple Islamic ambition for a Khilafah with a decadent British society whose leaders dare not speak out against Islam or oppose 'multiculturalism', and Islamic advances can be made.  Mosques can be built and expanded, Islamic schools established, cultural centres set up, and large amounts of public money can fund studies which do not benefit the United Kingdom..

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/16

*  *  *

 

 *  *  *

 

 

 
 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

Killers betray Islam and all Muslims and were driven by their wilfully perverted misinterpretation of faith, says academic

By Dr Taj Hargey For The Daily Mail

 - January 9th 2015, 3:42:24 am

The truth is that there is nothing remotely Islamic about all this murderous fundamentalism. The true tradition of the Muslim religion is one of tolerance and respect for others,

 says DR TAJ HARGEY.

Full article

 

 - January 9th 2015, 3:42:24 am

 

H.F.455

 

[ A MATTER OF FACT!]

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

 - (1994 -Official Website -DEC-PT2-2018-)-- 

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018       DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018       

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018      DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018   

  DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018      DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2018-

 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012