- (1994 -Official Website-DECEMBER-PT3-2018- )-- 

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018          DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018          DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018     DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2018-

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

*

A MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR.

*

A CALL TO ARMS

IN

2004

 

At a time of great peril to our Freedom and our Way-of Life

 

The Song of the Earth of England

by

Percy Bysshe Shelly – Eng.poet (1702-1822)

 

*“Men of England, heirs of Glory,

Heroes of the unwritten story,

Nurslings of one mighty Mother

Hopes of her, and one other;

 

“Rise like Lions after slumber

In unvanquished number,

Shake your chains to earth like dew

Which in sleep had fallen on you-

Ye are many-they are few.

 

“What is freedom?-ye can tell

That which slavery is , too well-

For its very name has grown

To an echo of your own.

 

“What art thou, Freedom? O! could slaves

Answer from their living graves

This demand-tyrants would flee

Like a dream’s dim imagery:

 

“Thou art not, as impostors say,

A shadow soon to pass away,

A superstition, and a name

Echoing from the cave of Fame.

 

Let a great Assembly be

Of the fearless and the free

On the spot of English ground

Where the plains stretch wide around.

 

“Ye who suffer woes untold,

or to feel, or to behold

Your lost country bought and sold

With a price of blood and gold-

 

“Let a vast assembly be’

And with great solemnity

Declare with measured words that ye

Are, as God has made ye free-

 

“Stand ye calm and resolute,

Like a forest close and mute,

With folded arms and looks which are

Weapons of unvanquished war.

 

“The old laws of England-they

Whose reverend heads with age are grey

Children of a wiser day;

And whose solemn voice must be

Thine own echo-Liberty!

 

“On those who first should violate

Such sacred heralds in their State

Rest the blood and that must ensue…

And it will not rest on you.

 

“And the bold, true warriors

Who have hugged Danger in wars

Will turn to those who would be free

Ashamed of such base company.

 

“Rise like Lions after slumber

In unvanquished number-

Shake your chains to earth like dew

Which in sleep had fallen on you-

Ye are many-they are few.”

 

*          *          *

 

[To Britain’s Queen the nations turn

Her rebuke to her ministers for their Lies

And to Warn and Advise them

To defend Her kingdom from Demise?]

2004

 

*

 

 

[A MATTER]

 'OF NECTAR

AT

CHRISTMAS'

BY

Quentin Letts:

...So ,why not poor yourself a cheeky sherry this week?

Served with a home-made cheese straw or a slice of ginger cake, it could be the  drink of the angels.

A dollop of it goes well in parsnip soup. Once the noon-day gun sounds, a slug of sherry down the gullet will heighten the Christmas mood and make you a great deal more Zen for when the in-laws arrive.

As Tiny Tim might say

GOOD CHEER TO EVERYONE.

*

[LETTS CELEBRATE!]

QUENTIN LETTS sees Theresa May give nothing away about Brexit

*

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: A £50bn Brexit bill? They should pay us ...

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER 21,2016

H.F.1070 BREXIT NOW

 

*

DAILY TELEGRAPH

TIM STANLEY

TUESDAY 27 November,2018

DAILY TELEGRAPH-TIM STANLEY-VOTERS CAN SEE THIS IS A BARGAIN BASEMENT DEAL


 

Obsessed with migration Mrs May's understanding of Brexit has always been excessively pessimistic

You can tell a lot about a product from the way it is sold

The Government intends to run a general election campaign to get its

WITHDRAWAL DEAL

THROUGH

PARLIAMENT

and its

TWIN WEAPONS are APATHY and FEAR

Vote for this deal and we need never discuss Brexit again! vote it down and we will run out of water and die.

This mix of cynicism and hysteria suggests

WE ARE BEING SOLD A FLAWED DEAL.

by people who never really understood

WHAT BREXIT WAS ABOUT.

Parliamentary critics of the withdrawal plan focus on one fundamental flaw:

THE BACK STOP.

.Once we leave the EU we get two years of status quo in which to negotiate a

NEW TRADE PACT;

IF WE FAIL,

which seems likely,we either extend this expensive transition or we enter a dis agreeable if the

CUSTOMS ARRANGEMENT

a backstop prison wherein the EU sets the rules and we have no influence

WE can only walk away if the EU agrees to it.

The GOVERNMENT insists this is a mere detail, the kind that only nerds and extremists would care about, and that the EUROPEANS will act in good faith anyway.

Well, the last few days have confirmed that we've handed over too much leverage: Spain used a veto threa THEt to force concessionary language on

GIBRALTER

and the FRENCH implied they were coming after our

FISH

the back is thus a legitamate concern and the GOVERNMENT is unwise, in fact rather patronising

to assume

the

VOTERS WON'T CARE ABOUT IT.

Are we

BORED of BREXIT,

 to use Jeremy Hunt's witty acronym?

OH ,MAMA YES. but when people say they want to get BREXIT

"OVER AND DONE WITH"

they don't necessarily at any cost.

its more likely to imply

THAT THEY ARE SICK OF THE ESTABLISHMENT DRAGGING ITS HEELS AND LIKE CANNY SHOPPERS IN THE MARKET, ARE WARY OF ANY DEAL THAT SMELLS LIKE A FUDGE OR A

SELL OUT.

Mrs May's pledge to "settle" Brexit, to put it past us and move on sounds superficially attractive, but we all know it's not that simple: there are several years of trade negotiations ahead, and if thet fail then, thanks to the

BACKSTOP

, we will be left  trapped in the EU's orbit like a dead moon.

This sounds pretty frightening. Even more frightening than whatever depraved voodoo ceremony Mrs May conducted in the No10 garden to raise

PROJECT FEAR

from its grave.

In the past few weeks we have been told the, if Britain fails to get a deal, we will have power outages, a plummet in the pound, a house price collapse, flight cancellations, a Mars Bar shortage, a medicine crisis, the Army on the streets and, this is the latest, less clean water.

Some of these are based on the real threat of bottlenecks at Dover, but the correct response from any government (ie what we pay them to do) would be to reassure the public with competance and invest for all eventualities.

If a no-deal Brexit does ruin the country, it will be the fault of a PM who failed to prepare for it: where is the dramatic expansion of Dover? Where are the alternative trade routes? The Tory manifesto stated that

NO DEAL WAS BETTER THAN A BAD DEAL

 but now we will get two weeks of being told the complete opposite:

If Parliament does not sign off on the backstop, innocents could die. It's not just the EU that is threatening the British unless they agree to its demands. The British Government sounds suspiciously

LIKE IT IS DOING THE SAME.

Mrs May does, however, have one thing to bribe us with:  less immigration. This has been an obsession throughout her career and she obviously sees the referendum result almost exclusively through that prism, which explains why she made that almost her sole red line and was happy to make concessions on so much else that energises LEAVERS. But while some Britons did vote on immigration alone, the essential issue of 2016 was the repatriation of

POLITICAL POWER

-power that could, yes, help control the border but could also revive  our

DEMOCRACY

and

REBUILD OUR ECONOMY.

Mrs May's understanding of politics, even of the voters, at times seems pessimistic, as if she has limited faith in human nature and the capabilities of

FREE NATIONS.

This deal is a triumph of low expectations, delivered at a moment when the sense of possibilities has never been greater.

Her withdrawal deal may yet die the way it has lived, clouded in misunderstanding of what a large  part of the country wants and how democracies function. Mrs May suggests a television debate with Jeremy Corbyn. WHY? We know she hates them: she threw away her majority last year after refusing to go live against Mr Corbyn in a head-to-head.  Mr Corbyn is already committed to voting the deal down, so most of his MPs aren't up for grabs;the audience at home don't get a vote.

 

The proper place for any substantive debate is PARLIAMENT, where the views of around  90 Tories who can't  let the backstop issue go actually matter

This , then, is pure entertainment, just like the Nick Clegg v Nigel Farage debates of 2014-the difference being that these two men genuinely passionately believed in the cause they articulated. As others have noted. Mr Corbyn probably isn't really for Remain and Mrs May isn't truly for Brexit. Neither salesman believes in the product theyre pitching.

 

DAILY TELEGRAPH-TIM STANLEY-VOTERS CAN SEE THIS IS A BARGAIN BASEMENT DEAL

Image result for DAILY TELEGRAPH-TIM STANLEY-VOTERS CAN SEE THIS IS A BARGAIN BASEMENT DEAL

Boris Johnson: My plan for a better Brexit - The Telegraph

 

*  *  *

 

FOLLOW Tim Stanley on Twitter

@timothy stanley; READ MORE at telegraph.co.uk/opinion

 

TUESDAY 27 November,2018

 
Letters to the Daily Telegraph-BREXIT SPECIAL, - Tuesday 27 November,2018 

 

Theresa May shows contempt for Parliament by wooing the country with a Remainer Brexit'

 

Sir -  The Withdrawal Agreement is not yet "legally binding" (Leading Article, November 25) since it has to be ratified by both the EU hierarchy and the UK Parliament.

Rather than overt acquisition of power by democratic consent, the EU has accrued power behind an almost impenetrable phalanx of complex structures, lawyers, diplomats, legalese and obfuscation.

By creating a system of Byzantine complexity, under guise of the rule of law, the cities of Europe have stealthily subverted democracy and removed power from the people.

T M

Chairman, J D Wetherspoon

Watford, Hertfordshire

*  *  *

 

Letters to the Daily Telegraph-BREXIT SPECIAL, - Tuesday,November 27,2018

[The en

[The encompassing tentacles of the

Beast

 are tightening on the remaining captive ,once free peoples of Europe in preparation for a

SOON TO BE A

SUPER-STATE.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS! NAMES ABBREVIATED INTO CAPITALS-FULL DETAILS FROM DAILY TELEGRAPH. ]

 

H.F.1676/8

H.F.1754

*
 

 DAILY MAIL

JUNE 14,2018

 

PUB chain WETHERSPOON

 is to

STOP SELLING WINE AND BEER

FROM

FRANCE and GERMANY

AHEAD OF

BREXIT

It will focus on offering more beverages from the UK and non EU producers across its 880 from JULY 9,2018.

Champagne and German wheat beers will be switched for English sparkling wine and craft beers in the run-up to leaving the EU.

But Kopparberg cider, which is currently made in Sweden, will stay stocked after the Swedish firm said it will switch production to the UK.

JD Wetherspoon chairman Tim Martin said:

'This is the start of a review of all our products in the next six to 24 months, with the object of making our business more competitive.'

He said tariffs imposed by the 'protectionist' EU were keeping prices high for UK consumers.

Some 2million people visit Wetherspoon pubs every week

The group sells more than 6million bottles of Kopparberg and 2million bottles of sparkling wine and prosecco every year, but fewer than 100,000 bottles of champagne are bought at its pubs.

In place of French fizz, the pubs will offer UK sparkling wine brands Denbies and Whitedowns as well as Australian Hardy wines. Meanwhile UK brewed wheat beers Blue Moon,Belguim White, Thornbridge Versa Weisse and mSA Braines Atlantic White will replace German brands such as Erdinger.

Russ Mould, investment director at saving firm AJ Bell, said

'Tim Martin's strong held political views are well known and you have to respect anyone's ability to stick to their principles so firmly.

'Excluding popular brands of drinks based on their country of origin seems an unusual move for a firm which you would think wants to be seen as inclusive and welcoming to customers of all views and beliefs, but Mr Martin knows his customers and has successfully built the firm by providing

VALUE FOR MONEY.

Mr Martin said Brexit would create big marking opportunities for UK and non-EU producers, which the pub group is keen to encourage.

The Wetherspoon chairman added: 'The products awe are introducing are at a lower prices than EU products they are replacing.

'We intend to honour existing contracts with EU suppliers some of which have several years to run, but we are starting to make the transition to

NON-EU TRADE

NOW.

 [CHEERS!-MR MARTIN]

*

JUNE 14-2018

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JUNE 14,2018

H F 1573

 

*
 

Don't Give In

To

The E U

 

WHY A UK COMPROMISE WITH BRUSSELS WILL CONFINE THEIR CAPTIVE NATION STATES EVEN TIGHTER TO ENSURE THERE CAN BE NO MORE DEFECTORS. WHILE A FIRM RESPONSE FOR A JUST SETTLEMENT FROM THE UK WILL GIVE HEART AND ASSISTANCE TO THOSE FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOTS PRISONERS OF HITLER'S PLANNED EU TO BAND TOGETHER TO FIGHT FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

WE SAY NO! TO COMPROMISE.

It is forgotten that an individual country which makes a decision affecting itself or others has the opportunity to remedy the situation. Whereas, in the EU this is not possible, unless ALL or the permitted number agree to the change and knowing the belligerence of Hitler's brainchild this could have serious and dangerous consequences.

Remember, the responsibility of the UK to assist those captive people's who wish to be

FREE

because it was the blood of British troops in the past that assisted the birth of many of the

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES in EUROPE.

BY STANDING FIRM FOR AN ORDERLY AND JUST EXIT FROM HITLER'S EU WE WILL RECOVER THAT RESPECT THAT OUR BROTHER NATIONS WHO SAW BRITAIN IN 1973 NEGLECT THEIR KIN AROUND THE WORLD FOR AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE WITH A COUNTRY

GERMANY

WHICH IN

TWO WORLD WARS

WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS  AND INJURIES OF MILLIONS AND VAST DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY...FOR WHICH THE LIKE THE WORLD WOULD NOT HAVE  PREVIOUSLY SEEN.

A FREE INDEPENDENT EUROPEAN UNION OF FREE PEOPLE'S WITHIN THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

YES!

THE PRESENT UNDEMOCRATIC-BULLYING EU.

NO!

The fault of our present situation is because of TREASON within the Tory Government of

Edward Heath

 A Nazi spy since 1938 reported to MI5 in 1938 by the Master of Balliol College, Oxford.

 Who in the 70's  and with previous administrations secretly conspired to lead the British people blindfolded into the Nazi-planned EU . It is therefore incumbent on the present Tory Government of Mrs May to bring the situation back to what it was before January 1973. The evidence of Tory wrong-doing has been on our website since 2005.

*

Compromise.

Compromise is but the sacrifice of one right or good in the hope of retaining another,-too often ending in the loss of both,

- Tryon Edwards

*

From the beginning of our history the country has been afflicted with compromise. It is by compromise that human rights have been abandoned. I insist that this shall cease. The country needs repose after all its trials; it deserves repose. And repose can only be found in everlasting principles.-

Charles Sumner

*

A surrender to the Nazi-planned EU would not bring repose to the millions of patriots who wanted their country back. An unjust settlement instead of a Churchillian response will see the battle continue until victory is secured.

Victory

You ask, What is our aim?  I can answer in one word: Victory - victory at all costs, victory in spite of all the terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival.

- Winston Churchill.

FOR THE MILLIONS WHO HAVE DIED IN THE PAST FOR THEIR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND THEIR CAN BE NO SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED UNDEMOCRATIC CAPTIVE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

*  *  *

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

BY

DAVID BROWN

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

 HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

 WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

*

[THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID

NOTHING!]

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

292

Remember constantly that it was Hitler's intention to unite Europe. (Just as it had been the ambitions of Charlemagne, Charles V, Louis XIV, Napoleon and the Kaiser.)

Remember it was Adolf Hitler who first used the phrase

'The United States of Europe.

Remember  that it was Hitler who had the idea of establishing regions of Europe in order to

DESTROY NATIONAL IDENTITIES.

 

He wanted to break European nations  into regions so that they could be ruled from

BERLIN.

 

MORE!

LINKS to A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/CON30/B404/B308

(www.vernoncoleman.com)

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

THIS COULD BE THE TIME FOR THOSE    MP'S in the SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY  OR OTHERS TO FORM THEIR OWN PATRIOTIC PARTY OF THE CENTRE. TO ATTRACT ALL VOTERS WHO LOVE  THEIR COUNTRY AND UNIQUE -PRIZED CONSTITUTION. WHO WANT IT BACK AS IT STOOD BEFORE JANUARY,1973.

Rees-Mogg-Borris Johnson... TO LEAD THE WAY!

THE EDP WOULD OFFER ITS NAME AND WITHDRAW FROM THE POLITICAL SCENE TO SUCH PATRIOTIC INDIVIDUALS AND AT THE LEAST WOULD SUPPORT SUCH A PARTY.

IN PARLIAMENT WE FIND THERE ARE LOBBY GROUPS SUCH AS FRIENDS OF WHO EVER BUT THERE ARE NO FRIENDS OF ENGLAND .IT IS ABOUT TIME THERE IS A PATRIOTIC BLOCK TO STAND UP FOR ENGLAND AND ITS PAST AND FUTURE. WE HAVE BEEN WAITING TOO LONG FOR A RETURN OF OUR ENGLISH PARLIAMENT - IS LONG OVERDUE.

LETS DO IT!

*  *  *

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

'Destroy [her] fib or sophestry. in vain

The creature's at [her] dirty work again.'

Pope

*

A CALL TO ARMS!

 

'Awake, arise, or be for ever fallen,'

JOHNJohn Milton

[before the Beast of Europe.]

*

The signs are that Mrs May's

PROMISE of BREXIT!

HAS INSTEAD AS MANY HAD ALREADY SUSPECTED YEARS AGO , AS A CONFIRMED REMAINER -SHE WOULD

BRUSSELS IT!

*

'Blest Isle, with matchless beauty crowned

And manly hearts to guard the fair:-

Rule Britannia! rule the waves!

Britons never will be slaves!'

J.THOMSON

[ With a Greater Remainer vote in Wales and Scotland the above verse is no more true,]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

NOVEMBER 14, 2018

*
 

 A DEMOCRACY OR A DICTATORSHIP?

 

[ON DECEMBER 11, 2018 -AFTER OVER TWO YEARS OF NEGOTIATIONS THE COMMONS WILL VOTE ON THE PRIME MINISTER'S' SO-CALLED BREXIT DEAL WHICH AS ALREADY SHOWN IS A SHAM TO PLEASE HER CLOSE FRIENDS IN THE EU. HER ORIGINAL COMMENT OUTSIDE NO10 THAT BREXIT MEANS BREXIT HAS BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE BEEN NOTHING OF THE SORT. SHE HAS SHOWN HERSELF TO BE A LIAR-PERJURER AND TRAITOR-IN THE IMAGE OF ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER PRIME MINISTER  EDWARD HEATH A NAZI SPY FOR 60 YEARS UNTIL HIS DEATH IN 2005. ALMOST THE SAME TACTICS WERE USED-TO KEEP EVERYTHING IN HER HANDS  WITH THE HELP OF TRUSTED CIVIL SERVANTS. FELLOW CONSERVATIVES HAVE. IT APPEARS SHE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN THE VIEWS OF HER CABINET, OR ANY OTHER MP UNLESS THEY MIRROR HER OWN. IF HER BREXIT MINISTERS SHOW PROGRESS SHE SHOWS THEM THE DOOR. SHE ACTS LIKE A SOUTH AMERICAN DICTATOR RATHER THAN A PRIME MINISTER IN THE HOME OF MAGNA CARTA, WE HEAR THAT THAT INDUCEMENTS HAVE BEEN OFFERED TO MPS TO ENSURE HER VOTE IS PASSED IN THE HOME OF ENGLISH DEMOCRACY WHICH SHE AND OTHERS HAVE DONE MUCH TO DESTROY. SURELY IF A CONNECTION IS FOUND OF AN MP CHANGING THEIR VOTE BECAUSE OF INDUCEMENTS OFFERED THAT INDIVIDUAL SHOULD BE SHOWN THE DOOR OF THE COMMONS.]

FRIDAY 28 NOVEMBER,2018

 

 

H.F.1676

*

LITTLEJOHN

 

 As Marx said, history does have the ... A Very British Coup revolved around a conspiracy by the military, the media, big business and M15...

 

 

So this is what a very British coup looks like.

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

SOME of you will recall the novel

A Very British Coup,

subsequently made into an award-winning television series on Channel 4.

It was written by Labour MP Chris Mullin, published in 1982, and revolved around a conspiracy by the

MILITARY-THE MEDIA-BIG BUSINESS-M15

to bring down a Left-wing government.

At the time, the plot was entirely credible, since Britain was riven by strikes and revolution was in the air. I read the book as a young labour and industrial correspondent, and it made sense to me.

 The Bennites were in the ascendancy, Margaret Thatcher was horribly unpopular and it looked as if the wizened Hampstead Leftie Michael Foot-Worzel Gummidge, as Private Eye dubbed him-would be our next Prime Minister.

Mullin's assumptions were based  on hard fact. In the Seventies there had been well-founded reports about the Establishment plot to depose Labour's Harold Wilson.

In some quarters, there were even rumblings of a military coup.

A couple of years ago, when the un reconstructed Bennite Jeremy Corbyn became leader, Mullen talked about writing a sequel. He imagined the Funny  People orchestrating a putsch to thwart a democratically elected Corbyn government.

Trouble is, history has a habit of not working out as you expect. Although, as Marx said, history does have the capacity to repeat itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. That's where we are right now. Except tragedy and farce are running in tandem.

WE are in the middle of

A VERY BRITISH COUP

but not as Mullin predicted. What we're seeing is an elaborate, well-financed and coordinated plot to overturn as extreme Left-wing Prime Minister

BUT

the democratically expressed will of the British people.

It's being mounted by the Government of the day, aided and abetted by Big Business and the Civil Service.

[A repeat of 1970's-again by a supposed Conservative Government.]

 

THIS is A  Very BRITISH Coup, only written by Lewis Carroll not Chris Mullin. In our new Looking Glass World, words mean-as Humpty Dumpty declared-whatever they want them to mean.

Thus the dwindling band of MPs sticking uo for the

17.4 MILLION who voted

LEAVE

are condemned as plotters and rebels

Those, including Theresa May, who are doing everything in their power to

PREVENT

BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU

and becoming once again a

PROUD SOVEREIGN NATION

are hailed absurdedly as true patriots

As I've said often enough, just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

About the only thing upon which I've ever agreed with Ken Livingstone - apart from cheap Tube fares - was when he wrote a book called

If Voting Changed Anything They'd Abolish it. The Establishment seems hell-bent on proving him

Right over Brexit .

[The EDP has over decades seen much evidence of this very fact and though continually bringing evidence to the surface nobody appears to be interested whether it is lack of Bobbies -on-the beat - Health Service in crisis-Pot-holes-closed Police Stations...Britons on worst State Pensions in the Europe-even Portugal is marginally more. And a bloated -wasteful and grotesque so-called FOREIGN AID which even some regimes as recipients have requested to be stopped .

I told  you the day after the referendum that the fix was already in . Now they're on the final furlongs

We're being informed, in no uncertain fashion that

OUR VOTES ARE WORTHLESS

that they don't count.

WE'RE TOO IGNORANT, TOO UNEDUCATED, TOO RACIST

To be taken seriously.

Politicians who try to square the circle are vilified.

One minute Dominic Raab, who attempted to make a go of being Brexit Secretary, is a principled pragmatic operator of the highest praise.

The next, when he is forced to resign because Mother Theresa has deliberately undermined his position and then lied about it, he's dismissed as a disloyal traitor. And If I hear anyone else demanding a second

'People's Vote'

I'll scream.

All they want to do is reverse the referendum result or give us three options so they can split the

LEAVE VOTE

To be honest, I can't take much more of this patronising guff. The Beeb's idea of discerning commentators these days seems to extend no further than 'Baroness' Shameless Chuckabutty, Potty Toynbee and Mad Alastair Campbell, the author of the dodgy dossier which took into an

ILLEGAL WAR IN IRAQ.

 

As I believe I may have observed before. Campbell is the only bloke I know with a certificate to prove he's sane.

And don't get me started on the CBI which throughout my career has been wrong about everything from joining the euro to the Thatcher reforms. The CBI speaks only for monopolistic, multinational megacorps, not the small-to-medium businesses which are the backbone of our economy and always get the rough end  of the pineapple from Brussels - even though they don't sell so much as a brass washer outside British borders.

Twenty-five-odd years ago, covering a CBI conference in Glasgow, I watched the chairman of Dunlop taking the stage wearing a kilt and waving a Union Jack, as part of an I'm Backing Britain campaign. The following week he sold the company to the Japanese.

These are the same people bnow claiming to have British interests at the heart of their determination to

KEEP US SHACKLED TO THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC EU

The final straw came when the arrogant Amber Rudd was restored to Government over the weekend and immediately demanded loyalty and unity around Mrs May's 'deal'.  Her commitment to 'loyalty' hasn't stopped her trashing Cabinet colleagues in the past.

This fanatically pro-EU women who oozes an inter-galactic sense of  entitledment from every pore, is the sister of the PR spiv Roland Rudd, who is paid a small fortune to run

PROJECT FEAR

on behalf of his well-healed clients.

Just imagine if one of Boris's siblings was cashing in on

BREXIT.

The calls from Remainers for the police to investigate would be deafening. By Sunday, I'd had enough and reached the point where I came over all Tom Robinson.

I've given up reading the papers,

I've given up watching TV.

 

LOOK, I repeat, for those of you who missed it the first time round, even tungsten-tipped hard Brexiteers like me accept there will have to be some concessions if we're going to escape from the EU straitjacket.

And I do think the prospect of a Marxist Corbynista government is too horrible to contemplate.

But I also believe its 1992 all over again. This is Mother Theresa's

BLACK WEDNESDAY

MOMENT

WHATEVER HAPPENS NEXT

THE TORIES

ARE SHOT TO PIECES.

All trust and confidence in them has drained away and we're looking at a Labour government by default whenever the next election is called

Most of the 17.4 million who believe they have been betrayed will simply stay at home, or drift back to Labour. Democracy will be the ultimate casualty of this shabby debacle.

The pathetic defeatest dog's breakfast of an agreement

 which Mother Theresa is trying to force down our throats isn't worthy of the description 'deal'.

It is a monstrous capitulation and will be etched on her political gravestone, even if she does manage to get it, or a version thereof, through Parliament.

Where do we go from here?

I haven't a clue.

But at least we now know exactly

what a

Very British Coup

LOOKS LIKE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 20,2018

H.F.1747

*

DAILY EXPRESS

CHARLOTTE DAVIS

 

Brexit news: Furious Brits are 'fed up' of Brexit and want people to stop moaning and "just get out" of the European Union... - Daily Express

by CHARLOTTE DAVIS

November 27,2018

Residents in Leeds, an area which voted to Remain by one of the closet

margins in the country, have said they are "fed up" with MPs in Parliament bickering over Brexit deal proposed by the Prime Minister Theresa May. One furious Leeds resident had a clear message for the Prime Minister. He told BBC news

"WE VOTED, GET OUT..

All the people that are whinging about it

GET OVER IT.

 

Brexit news: Furious Brits are 'fed up' of Brexit and want people to stop moaning and "just get out" of the European Union... - Daily Express

by CHARLOTTE DAVIS

November 27,2018

[IT IS LONG OVERDUE OUR TWO FINGER -REVERSED WAR-TIME CHURCHILLIAN MESSAGE TO BERLIN AND CO- CONSPIRATOR - PARIS

 HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION POST HASTE.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

 

H.F.1756

 

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

*  *  *

 

WORLD  NEWS!

 

THE MAKING OF A NEW WORLD!

 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Western civilization heading for a reboot over the holidays

Many signs and confirmations from highly placed sources indicate that a reboot of Western civilization is being planned for 2019.  The shutdown of the U.S. government over the holidays, for example, has nothing to do with building a wall, and everything to do with a financial reboot and upcoming military tribunals.

However, what is coming is about much more than just rounding up the criminals who hijacked and bankrupted the U.S. government—it is about fixing the problems besetting monotheism.

Since today is December 24th, Christmas Eve, it’s a good time to remind people of the historical truth behind this holiday.  The fact is that nobody knows when Jesus Christ was born, so the early Christian church hijacked the old solar New Year holiday and replaced the sun with Jesus.  Here’s the thing:  the sun sets at its most northern point on December 21st, the winter solstice.  For three days afterwards, it appears to set at the same place, and then on December 25th it starts setting further south, marking the birth of the solar New Year.  Thus, the Christian church needs to confess and tell people the truth about Christmas without in any way denying the wonderful teachings of Jesus Christ and Christianity.

The Jews, for their part, need to stop celebrating the xenophobic Hanukkah and realize that it is perfectly kosher to celebrate the solar New Year (unless they somehow think the Creator did not make the sun).  Anyway, Merry Christmas to the Christians and Muslims, and Merry Sunmas to everybody else.

These issues, together with discussions of updating the calendars to bring them back into line with the movements of the heavens on which they are based, are going to be part of a broad public discourse in the New Year.  That is because, at the highest levels of world power, a decision has been made to go ahead and rebuild the temple in Jerusalem and turn that city into an international free zone.  This is why 2019 is likely to be a year for the history books.

In preparation for these upcoming historical changes, U.S. troops are being withdrawn from various conflict zones in order to pave the way for world peace, CIA sources say.  Pentagon sources agree, adding that “U.S. President Donald Trump is pulling out of Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, and the Ukraine to terminate the Deep State and the Zionists, since the global currency reset requires peace and cessation of hostilities.”

European royal family sources concur that preparations are under way for a reboot of the global financial system.  The current U.S. dollar, Euro, and Japanese yen-based system is bankrupt and dysfunctional, these and other sources agree.  This is especially true of the United States, which has been bankrupt for quite some time now, the sources say.  That’s why this current U.S. government shutdown is going to lead to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Secret head of world finance, Cardinal Pell, fired and big changes coming

Last week Cardinal George Pell was found guilty of sexually abusing children by an Australian court and was subsequently fired by Pope Francis because he was “elderly.”
https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/12/12/cardinal-pell-top-advisor-pope-francis-found-guilty-historical-sexual-offenses

This is huge news in the secret world of finance, because Pell was the person in charge of financial matters at the Vatican and thus was a secret controller of most world government leaders, P2 Freemason and CIA sources say.  This is because when most world rulers take power, they get a visit from an official of the Vatican Bank who hands them a bank book with an astronomical number written in it (a billion dollars or more for big countries;  less for smaller countries).  They are then told, “Welcome to the world of the rich,” and are gently reminded that if they refuse to accept the money they will be “removed.”

This is the choice of silver or lead that has allowed the Vatican P2 Freemason Lodge, run by descendants of the Caesars, to secretly rule most world governments.  The 200 leaders who last week affirmed the fraudulent “carbon causes global warming” agreement are all slaves of this system, P2 Freemason and CIA sources agree.
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/12/14/18139402/cop24-climate-change-katowice-poland

Thus, the removal of the head of this secret control system will have huge repercussions for world finance and politics, depending on who is selected to replace him, and also depending on whether or not this secret system will be allowed to continue.

On that front, another huge news item (still not fully confirmed because it only comes from one royal family source) is that a new head of the Committee of 300, the secret government of the 13 ruling bloodline families, will take power next year.  This means Queen Elizabeth will be handing the committee reins to a younger person (hint:  not Charles and not William).

With this caveat in mind (i.e., only one source), here some excerpts from a statement by the soon-to-be-appointed new committee head:  “The 13 ruling bloodlines and I have had enough of this world and the minions charged with its curation.  All Sovereign Heads of State and all respective governments fired.  Ordo ab Chao.

The source also said, “Sir Alexander Younger at MI6 is already briefed, along with the Queen in London and the Emperor in Tokyo,” about this development.

The statement further read that, “The Habsburg dynasty and spin-offs—most criminally psychopathic—have …
 

 remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Previous JCS Chairman

Ben:  Enjoy your weekly newsletters and I put more credence in you than any other source.  I’m curious about your comment in last newsletter, “as the previous JCS Chairman was Army.”  I believe you’ll find that Gen. Joseph Dunford was a United States Marine.  Means a lot to us former active duty Marines!  Have a great day.
I was referring to his predecessor Mike Dempsey, since Dunford is still JCS Chairman for now.
–BF

 

Secret war centers on SWIFT after George Bush Sr. is executed

Since the death of Nazi Fourth Reich Fuhrer George Bush Sr., the battle for control of the world’s financial system, and thus of the process of deciding humanity’s future, is now centering on control of the SWIFT international interbank electronic transfer system.

A final battle is taking place between the 13 bloodlines which have traditionally controlled the planet, and the meritocratic Gnostic Illuminati who control the U.S. military-industrial complex, multiple sources agree.  The battle is heading for a climax of sorts now that George Bush Senior has been “executed,” as confirmed by both Pentagon and CIA sources.

Here is what a CIA source had to say:

“I have been told by two sources that G.H.W. Scherff (Bush) was actually indicted on September 10, 2018 for crimes against humanity, child trafficking, sedition, and treason.  He allegedly plea-bargained a deal with the military tribunal hearing his case, to be executed/suicided to keep his legacy intact for his family and the sheeple.  Trump signed the death order.  So was it a clone that was executed, since we also have intel that he died in June (another clone).  I think Bush/Scherff actually died in January 1992, choking on sushi and then finished off by Barbara Bush with a poisoned cloth (as seen in the video posted last week).  Military tribunals are set to begin on January 2, 2019.”

Pentagon sources, for their part, said U.S. President Donald “Trump was careful not give Bush 41 a state funeral, as this executed criminal was denied a horse and caisson like Reagan got.”

“To the victor belong the spoils, for Trump picked former Bush Attorney General Bill Parr as his next AG and he chose ‘the day that will live in infamy,’ December 7th [the Pearl Harbor anniversary] to do it,” the Pentagon source added.

The CIA source also wondered if Barr made “a deal to avoid military tribunals and then be ‘McCained’? (the term being used lately for execution/suicide).  Maybe he flipped like Senator Lindsey Graham?”

The death of Bush, the former U.S. Ambassador to China whose brother handed over U.S. military secrets to that country (as did Hillary and Bill Clinton), means that the U.S. and China are also heading to a showdown as bloodline families seek Chinese protection, according to secret society sources.

Pentagon sources say the arrest of Chinese conglomerate Huawei’s Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou “is aimed to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

H.F.1764

*  *  *

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

I'm a

Brexiteer

Get me

OUT

of here!

 

...MY BEST guess on Brexit has always been that a dirty deal was done before the Chequers ambush in the summer

Mother Theresa would present her shabby withdrawal agreement, certain in the knowledge that it would never get the support of her own party, let alone the House of Commons.

But in the process, she would shed the most truculent Brexiteers from her Government and eventually, pull a rabbit from the hat at the last minute which would allow her to plot a marshmallow soft Brexit-in-name-only through Parliament.

I assumed the EU's grand panjandrums were fully on board with this cynical stitch-up, whatever noises they made for public consumption

. If there's one thingJean- Paul-Georges-et Ringo would love more than the UK crawling back into the fold, tail between legs. It's, Mrs May's craven plan to keep us in their orbit as a serf state, under the thumb but shorn mof all influence.

Up until yesterday, anyway, everything was going according to plan. That was before she bottled putting her 'deal' to the vote, when the overwhelming scale of her looming defeat became apparent.

No prime Minister could have survived in office given the hammering she would have taken in the division lobbies. So, instead of scuttling off to Brussels begging for more pre-arranged concessions' after a slim mdefeat in Parliament, she has been forced to step back from the abyss.

Now what?

Theresa says she intends to return to the EU to seek further 'reassurance' on the Irish backstop. Be honest, have you any idea what this 'backstop' nonsense is all about?  It's an elaborate smoke-screen dreamed up to stop a proper Brexit.

LONG story short, without going into teeth-grindingly boring detail, it is designed to divide Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK and ensure that we can never, ever,leave the EU's cuastoms union, without the permission of our

SO-CALLED 'PARTNERS.

That pipsqueak ingrate Irish premier Lenny Verruca didn't do Mrs May any favours yesterday, either, dancing a jig to the Brussels tune and issuing empty threats against a benevolent, and much larger, neighbour which kept his country afloat during difficult economic times.

Of all the horror stories put about by

PROJECT FEAR

the warnings about Brexit imperilling the Irish peace process are by far and away the

MOST DESPICABLE.

It is an insult not just to Britain but to the Irish people themselves, on whichever side of the political divide, who have invested so much in resolving their differences.

For opportunist politicians to exploit

GOODWILL

with incendiary remarks about reigniting violence is beneath contempt.

So, too, the garbage about children going hungry because school meals won't be available after Brexit, or people dying from lack of imported medicines. Enough, already.

Look, I say again, even hardline 'no deal' Brexiteers like me accept that there will have to be some compromises if we are to

GET OUT OF THE EU

in one piece.

But the antics of the political class have been shameful, an insult to the intelligence of every single one of us who pay their wages.

As I said last week,

WHO CAN YOU TRUST ?

With a few honourable exceptions, their collective behaviour as been

SELF-SERVING and DISGRACEFUL.

I admired Boris for having the courage to come out in favour of

LEAVE

even if he did take for ever to weigh his options.

He should have got the top job after the referendum, but was carved up by his oppo Michael Gove, who clearly still fancies his own chances of becoming Prime Minister. Don't they all?

But when Boris turned up on TV at the weekend with a smart new haircut, my heart sank.

This is no longer about

BREXIT

It's about

HIM.

THEN I read that Boris is apparently part of a Tory leadership dream ticket with Amber Rudd. I'm sorry, I'll just read that again. This is the same Look back in Amber who not so long ago was slagging off Boris, accusing him of not being safe in taxis.

Now were asked to believe they're Westminster's lovey-dovey answer to Seann and Katya whoever they are). I'm only surprised that Amber hasn't had a Mrs Thatcher perm-that's if Esther Mc Rantzen, or whatever her name is, hasn't beaten her to it.

And so this is Christmas, and what have they done? Apart from squabbling among themselves-

NOTHING.

My best guess is still that a grubby deal has been done and may yet be revived.

But after yesterday, I wouldn't bank on anything any more.

The political class must think that we're so stupid and bored with the whole business that we'll accept any deal they can cobble together.

And, you know what , sadly maybe they're right.

I'm a Brexiteer. Get me

OUT

 of here!

*  *  *

[The present political system is bankrupt. Only PR can save our nation from eventual Despotism. AS we have stated over the past decades Members of Parliament should ONLY serve one TERM in office which should ensure that MPs will in the main do the best they can for THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS and THEIR COUNTRY.  It will ensure that those from all  walks of life have the opportunity to SERVE THEIR PEOPLE and THEIR COUNTRY. Not as now when the greater majority have decided ONLY TO

SERVE THEMSELVES.]

*  *  *

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: I'm a Brexiteer get me out of here! | Daily Mail...

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

DECEMBER 11,2018

H.F.1763

 
 

DOMINIC LAWSON: Why pompous Milburn is so wrong about Britain's haves and have nots

Jumped before he was pushed: Alan Milburn presented his departure as 'social mobility tsar' as a resignation on a matter of principle despite the fact his term had come to an end

How strange it is that Alan Milburn should routinely have been described as the Government's 'social mobility tsar', a grandiose title to which he never objected.

After all, the Russian tsar was the apex of a system of absolute social hierarchy. Now our social mobility 'tsar' has abdicated, protesting that the Government is doing nothing to bring about the more equal country that the Social Mobility Commission was designed to support.

In fact Milburn's abdication is no more voluntary than that of Tsar Nicholas II, 100 years ago. As Justine Greening, the Education Secretary, pointed out yesterday, he'd been doing the job for five years 'and his term had come to an end'.

In other words, Milburn jumped before he was pushed, and presented it as a resignation on a matter of principle.

In one respect, Milburn really did enjoy the status of a tsar: his pronouncements as chairman of the Social Mobility Commission were always accorded complete reverence — not least on the BBC — and were never subjected to any sort of critical review.

When this quango was launched in 2012 by the then coalition top team of David Cameron and Nick Clegg (largely, I suspect, because both men were embarrassed by their own exclusively private education and wealthy backgrounds), Milburn declared: 'We live in a country, where, invariably, if you're born poor, you die poor.'

He repeated this on many occasions — and was never challenged on it by his many TV and radio interviewers.

But it is — and was — completely untrue. Even the Sutton Trust, an organisation dedicated to the cause of increasing the life-chances of the less well-off, has produced research completely refuting Milburn's central proposition.

Feared

Its most recent analysis, dividing society into quartiles by income, revealed that 62 per cent of sons born to fathers in the bottom income quartile, themselves escaped into the higher three quartiles.

 

Education Secretary Justine Greening pointed out on the Andrew Marr show that Alan Milburn jumped before he was pushed from the role

Moreover, as you would expect, there was social movement (as defined by income) in the opposite direction.

Only 42 per cent of sons born to fathers from the top income bracket managed to retain that position in the highest income quartile — and 16 per cent of those born in the top income category slid all the way to the bottom.

So why did Milburn get away with it? Well, the Conservatives didn't dare criticise him because they feared — especially under David Cameron — that they would be seen as defending 'elitism'. And for Labour, Milburn's position was pleasantly in accord with their own claim that only a Labour government would represent 'the many, not the few'.

Funnily enough, it is within the Labour party — of which the former Cabinet minister Milburn is still a member — that there has been an actual retreat in working-class success.

In 1964, 37 per cent of Labour MPs were from a family background of manual work; by 2015 that figure had plunged to just 7 per cent.

 

David Cameron's government dare not criticise Milburn because they feared that they would be seen as defending 'elitism'

This process is even accentuated by its current leader, Jeremy Corbyn, as the resoundingly middle-class socialist pressure group Momentum tightens its hold on the selection process.

Ludicrous

On Saturday, the Mail reported 'Labour insiders' as saying that the son of a miner, Kieran Harpham, had been de-selected as a Sheffield councillor because he was 'too authentically working-class' and 'not Left-wing enough': he has been replaced by Janet Ridler, a historian from Sheffield's wealthiest suburb, Dore.

To be fair to Alan Milburn, he is far from a Corbyn fan. He is, to the contrary, a Blairite. And, echoing his former boss, Milburn presented Brexit as a curse on British society, which must somehow be lifted. 'Tough on Brexit, tough on the causes of Brexit,' was Milburn's ludicrous slogan yesterday — which is as much as to say that he thinks the British people's decision to leave the EU was nothing less than a crime.

He went on to argue, confusingly, that if Theresa May didn't do what he said about social mobility, she would be 'betraying the families who voted for Brexit'.

His claim, such as it is, seems to be that those who voted to leave the EU did so as a protest against the nation's lack of social mobility, and its alleged adverse effect on their living standards.

It is an assertion both presumptuous and pompous, based on no evidence. If anything, the pro-Brexit vote in the Labour heartlands was one in favour of greater social cohesion, and against the form of mobility defined by the EU's absolute guarantee of freedom of movement.

Milburn's ludicrous 'tough on Brexit, tough on the causes of Brexit,' slogan suggests that he thinks the British people's decision to leave the EU is nothing less than a crime

The consequent unchecked level of immigration into the UK had many benefits, but the influx of millions of Europeans to work in this country also had a depressing effect on the wages of the unskilled. Such voters would, more likely, argue that the only way Mrs May could 'betray' them over Brexit would be to do what Mr Milburn wants and keep Britain inside the Single Market (which mandates freedom of movement).

But what is it, above anything else, which enables those from less well-off homes to have a chance of prosperity? A first-class quality of free education and the prospect of regular employment at the end of it. By both these measures, Britain has actually been upping its game — and it has nothing to do with Mr Milburn's Social Mobility Commission.

Employment rates have been rising, for year after year, and the proportion of families without anyone in paid work has (thankfully) gone in the opposite direction — down. The latter has much to do with the benefit reforms pioneered by Iain Duncan Smith.

His colleague, Michael Gove, was also instrumental, as Education Secretary, in driving up standards in state schools by demanding a greater level of rigour in both teaching and examinations.

The result of this has been a narrowing of the quality gap — and public exam outcomes — between state schools and private schools.

Again, this was no thanks to the Social Mobility Commission. It had nothing useful to say about improving the standards of teaching, and instead advocated lowering standards of entry at our top universities to those from the poorest homes. What a counsel of despair.

Of course we are an unequal society. As are all societies in all nations, always. But despite the self-serving cliches of the Left, last year in the UK income inequality — defined as the gap between the earnings of the richest and the poorest — fell to its lowest level since 1986.

Benefit reforms pioneered by Iain Duncan Smith, left, and the drive to improve standards in state schools by his colleague Michael Gove had nothing to do with Mr Milburn's Social Mobility Commission

And, as the Chancellor Philip Hammond pointed out in his Budget speech a fortnight ago, since 2010 the incomes of the poorest 10 per cent have grown faster, proportionately, than the richest 10 per cent.

Obsessed

It's true that we are in a long period of earnings stagnation: but this applies across the developed world. And it is simply not the case that Britain is at the bottom of the international league table in terms of social mobility.

We are probably more obsessed with class than any other nation, and accent still plays too much of a role in the way we treat each other.

But as Peter Saunders, emeritus professor of sociology at Sussex University explained in his recent Civitas pamphlet, Social Mobility Delusions: 'Social mobility is the norm in Britain, not the exception, and it covers the range from top to bottom. Politicians say our social mobility rate is one of the lowest in the Western world, but studies of class mobility put Britain around the middle of the international rankings.

'The chances of moving into a different class than the one you were born into are less than in Sweden, the U.S. and Australia, but better than in Germany, France or Italy.'

So do we actually need a quango called the Social Mobility Commission?

We can certainly do without another social mobility 'tsar'. 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5142221/Why-Milburn-wrong-Britains-haves-nots.html#ixzz50fTDt3Ba
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

H.F.1408

LITTLEJOHN

 

The Living Dead

AND

The Joy of Brexit

DAILY MAIL- RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: The Joy of

Brexit

 

NOVEMBER 13,2018

 

JUST when you thought the Brexit debacle couldn't get any worse, the crypt door creaks open and out crawls Gordon Brown to give us the benefit of his wisdom.

Looking like an extra from a George Romero zombie movie, Gordon Brown became the latest member of the Living Dead to demand a second referendum.

His two immediate predecessors, Tony Blair and Johnny Major are already doing their damnest to overturn the clearly expressed will of

17.4 MILLION PEOPLE

who voted unequivocally

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION.

I think we can safely ignore Gordon's view on

DEMOCRACY.

After losing the 2010 General Election, managing to harvest 29 per cent of votes cast, he tried to hang on by what remained of his fingernails and had to be dragged out of Downing Street four days later.

HE WAS THE MAN WHO SIGNED THE LISBON TREATY IN SECRET,

sneaking in through the tradesmen's entrance to avoid photographers.

You may vaguely recall that Blair and Brown gave a solemn promise to hold a referendum on Lisbon and then cynically reneged on it. Major forced the Maastricht Treaty through the Commons, in the teeth of fierce opposition, and consigned the Conservative Party to

13 years in the wilderness.

Gordon's solution to heal the divisions which could only be exacerbated still further would be to establish a new Royal Commission to 'engage and listen' to voters views.

Brilliant.

That's exactly what millions of us had in mind when we voted in 2016.

What Do We Want?

Royal Commission!

When Do We Want It?

Now!

Anyway, what's wrong with simple accepting the outcome of the biggest single democratic exercise in

BRITISH HISTORY.

The only reason we have bitter divisions in some sections of society is that

well-funded fanatical Remainers refuse to acknowledge the result of the first

'PEOPLE'S VOTE'

and are determined

TO REVERSE IT.

Sadly this poisonous cohort contains three of our four former PM's.

To Call Me Dave's credit, he has maintained a dignified distance from the self-styled resistance to Brexit.

But what is it about certain ex-prime ministers that persuades them they immediately become sagacious statesman the moment they leave office, regardless of the mess they left behind?

Why do they think they can completely disregard the wishes of those who once voted for them and kept them in the manner to which they always  felt entitled?

Of course, all Prime Ministers eventually go mad. It just takes some a little longer than others.

IN the case of Theresa May, who is still there (for now), she has already managed to convince herself that she is the only person with the wit, imagination and ability to decide what comprises a successful

BREXIT

The sad fact is that she possesses precisely none of those qualities. As a direct result of her fatal combination of stubborness and stupidity, she has achieved the feat of joining the ranks of the

LIVING DEAD

while still in the job.

[The crisis on our streets has been brought about by Theresa May when Home Secretary when she upset the POLICE FEDERATION and she undoubtedly holds a grudge because it is lack of FINANCE that has seen the virtual disappearance of the Bobbie-on-the Beat and closure of POLICE STATIONS and the 'Wild West' anarchy on our streets.]

 

On the other hand, I suppose it takes a special kind of genius to alienate

EVERYBODY

-Leaver. Remainers, the EU Commission, the DUP-YOU NAME IT.

 

When you manage to upset both sides of the Johnson family, you're in big trouble. As I wrote back at the time of Chequers sell-out in July, she's hopelessly bungled the negotiations and is prepared to reduce Britain to

serf status

in her desperation to

SEAL A DEAL:

'Independent sovereign nations do not accept the jurisdiction of unelected foreign judges. Independent sovereign nations do not swallow wholesale rules made by unaccountable foreign bureaucrats. Independent sovereign nations are at liberty to conclude free trade deals with any country in the world.'

 

And for this she wants to bung Brussels

£39BILLION

OF OUR MONEY

Since Chequers, it's got even worse. No wonder even Remainers like Jo Johnson despair.

About the only sensible thing Gordon Brown said yesterday was that we can still go back to the EU and tell them the deal on the table won't wash - despite the fact that Brussels hasn't even agreed to that.

They think Mother Theresa is so feeble that they have been emboldened to demand continued access to Britain's fishing waters. That would be the ultimate humiliation among many. Grocer Heath gave up our traditional fishing waters to get us in to the EU. Now Mrs May could give them away again so we can 'LEAVE'.

 

YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP.

But Gordon's right. We can go back and renegotiate. Just not with the dismal, defeatist Theresa in charge

She should have the decency to resign in July, when it was clear the game was up

The only way forward is for her to fall off her kittren heels, sooner than later. After two wasted years of dissembling, betrayal, incompetance and downright surrender to Brussels, Mother Theresa deserves nothing less than an ignominious departure.

If the Conservative Party can rediscover some backbone and sense of self-preservation they can get rid of her tomorrow without having to trigger a protracted leadership contest, provided they agree on a single compromise candidate.

Who would replace her? Does it really matter? Years ago, when there was talk of a stalking horse candidate standing against Johnny Major, I reakoned a real horse could beat him.

So I invited readers to vote for either Major or Red Rum as Prime Minister. Red Rum romped home by a margin of

9-1

The talk in some quarters is that Home Secretary Sajid Javid might be the right fit. He is bright, has a compelling backstory and although he sided with Remain during the referendum, is not a committed EU federalist.

On the downside, when it comes to inspirational public speaking, he has all the charisma of Albert RN,

But beggars can't be choosers. And we can't go on as we are

Even diehard 'no deal'  Brexiteers like me have to accept, as Mick Jagger said, that you can't always get what you want.

The best we can probably hope for at this late stage is a

Norway For Now Deal;

which would get us out of the EU with no barriers to frictionless trade. It wouldn't be ideal but we could try to pick the bones out of it later.

 

Unless the Tories can pull a relatively cheap Brexit out of the fire, they will forfeit all trust and credibility and we will be staring down the barrel of a Corbyn government by default.

 

 

In a just universe, Labour shouldn't benefit from the Tory disarray. They're all over the place, too, and will vote down any deal put before Parliament because they want to force a General Election.

 

The Conservatives may be  what Terry-Thomas would have called a 'absolute shower', but do really want to live in a country with Corbyn in No 10, Mr McDonnell running the Treasury and Diane Abbott in charge of immigration and the Old Bill?

As FOR the Liberals, at least they managed to provide us with a little light relief.

Not only has 82-year old Lord Lester been suspended from the House for offering to make a women a baroness if she agreed to become his mistress - an allegation that he says is 'completely untrue'.

We also learn that 'one of their senior advisers has fallen foul of the #MeToo madness.

Apparently, he propositioned a female colleague after inviting her to dinner to discuss his party's 'Brexit position'.

Ding, dong!

I've heard of the missionary position but the Brexit position is a new one on me.

In case you're wondering exactly what her idea of the Brexit position, its like this:

Shackled together, facing both ways at once, with little prospect of an early withdrawal.

*  *  *

 

NOVEMBER 13,2018

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS-CHANGES OF FORM- ARE OURS]

 

 

STATEMENT

[Mr Richard Littlejohn has drawn an impressive  and positive picture of the present political scene which will be looked on as one of the most important epochs in the history of our island home.

 How a once FREE DEMOCRACY was SOLD out to a FOREIGN POWER and hindered in its RETRIEVAL by its ELECTED CHAMBER shows how the PEOPLE failed to heed the message of HISTORY that unless VIGILANCE is KEPT then THEIR FREEDOM is at RISK..

Over the past DECADES many PATRIOTS have WARNED of the CONSEQUENCES of the NEGLECT of our WORLD-PRIZED ANCIENT PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY an INHERITANCE in TRUST for FUTURE GENERATIONS.. THE FUTURE IS UNCERTAIN because TRAITORS within our ELECTED CHAMBER are in the ENEMIES CAMP of TWO BLOODY WORLD WARS  GERMANY because the EU was the BRAINCHILD of ADOLF HITLER.

 WHEN we are AGAIN a FREE NATION STATE our CONSTITUTION should be AMENDED to PREVENT ever AGAIN our NATION STATE of ENGLAND being a SUBJECT STATE of another POWER by the EMBEDEDMENT of OUR FREEDOM in the CONSTITUTION OF OUR COUNTRY. THe LAW of TREASON should be updated to ensure that any future individuals are punished ,who plot to undermine the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

of

ENGLISHMEN. "]

the very foundation of many constitutions the world over.

'...The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their own rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no  shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.  It may be very wrong to say that the forms of Government are of no importance and that the best system is the one best administered.  But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of FREE INSTITUTIONS is their enabling men to obtain a wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those who live under it to WATCH the CONDUCT of their RULERS, aiding them when RIGHT, checking them when they are WRONG; and above all, that no Constitution however excellent, can supersede the NECESSITY or DISPENCE with the DUTY of this CONSTANT VIGILANCE.' [Caps are Ours]

 by HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM FRS-LONDON-1844

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 13-2018

 

 

H.F.1759

DAILY EXPRESS

LEO McKINSTRY

 

 

[A GROSS FAILURE OF DIRECTION  OVER DECADES BY A SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY.]

*

News for DAILY EXPRESS-TORIES ARE PARALYSED... TOO INEPT TO DEAL WITH CRIME AND DEBT...

 by

LEO McKINSTRY

Daily Express columnist

DECEMBER 3,2018

Brexit should and start an invigorating new chapter in our island story be a golden opportunity for our nation to regain

INDEPENDENCE

and start an invigorating new chapter in our island story.

But in the hands of the enfeebled Tory government the process

of

WITHDRAWAL

 from the EU has been turned into the

GREATEST POLITICAL CRISIS

 since the

SECOND WORLD WAR .

Rather than embracing the

SPIRIT

of the

2016 VOTE

Westminster is gripped by

TURMOIL.

Amid the high-profile resignations, backbench revolts and fevered leadership speculation, the every very act of

DEPARTURE

is now threatened by the prospect of Parliamentary stalemate or a second referendum.

At the heart of this mess is a chronic failure of imagination and courage by the political establishment. Unable to contemplate life for Britain outside the EU, Theresa May and the ruling elite have produced a zombie Brexit proposal that could

LEAVE US IN A TWILIGHT ZONE OF INDEFINITE BRUSSELS CONTROL.

The DEAL is so unpopular that the Government is resorting to a desperate reprise of

PRODUCT FEAR

in their attempt to push it through the

COMMONS.

Yet institutionalised cowardice applies far more widely than just BREXIT.

What Ministers now suffer from

 is a collective lose of nerve

Paralysed by their own caution and ineptitude they seem to have abandoned faith in

CONSERVATIVE VALUES

preferring surrender

to the

PROGRESSIVE ORTHODOXY

The result is an accelerating breakdown in

CREDIBILITY  AND RESOLVE.

That pattern can be found in every field of governance. The Tories used to be the party of

LAW AND ORDER

but today they preside over a society where

CRIME IS SPIRALLING OUT OF CONTROL.

while the police are emasculated.

Official statistics show that 120 knife attacks are recorded every single day with the total of such offences surging to

21,602

in the first six months of 2018.

Similarly over the last year, overall violent crime went up by 19 per cent and robberies 23 per cent.

Yet in the face of this lawlessness police numbers continue to dwindle. Even when thugs are apprehended they are treated with dangerous leniency. A recent survey found that just a third of violent offenders are given custodial sentences.

When she first became Prime Minister Theresa May famously spoke of her determination to confront "burning injustices" But perhaps the greatest injustice of all is the acceptance by the state of appalling levels of criminality.

In the same vein, the Conservatives once had a reputation for strong defence, yet recent years have seen a dramatic decline in the strength of

OUR ARMED FORCES.

As disturbingly the spending priorities have been grossly warped by vain globalist ambitions. So over £6billion is squandered on two gigantic aircraft carriers, which consume much of the Royal Navy's resources in their own protection, though there are just two Border Force patrol boats to guard the entire English Channel...

More morally disgraceful is the Government's collusion with the current judicial witch-  hunts against military veterans who served in Ulster and Iraq. Such heroes, whose only crime was to do their duty, should be protected, not exposed to opportunistic legal vultures and compensation seekers.

In the past the Tories claimed to be the party of fiscal responsibility , yet now Mrs May eagerly declares that "austerity is over" , despite the

FACT

THAT OUR NATIONAL DEBT IS OVER

£1.7 TRILLION.

A PERFECT symbol of this profligacy is the £56billion HS2 rail project, which is a shambles that the current chairman Sir Terry Morgan, who has only been in the job four months, openly admitted at the weekend that he is likely to lose his job.  There are far better uses for

PUBLIC FUNDS

in transport than this monstrous vanity project'

 

The same politically motivated extravagance an be seen in the

FOREIGN AID PROJECT

which has just passed the

£14BILLION

-a year mark, more than the Government spends on the

POLICE.

Much of this colossal sum is,

WASTED

not only through

CORRUPTION AND MISMANAGEMENT that

but also by the encouragement of welfare dependency.

With epic self-delusion, Tory chieftains believe that such largesse shows they are no longer the "nasty party", to quote Mrs May's notorious phrase, but in reality, this gigantic exercise in subsidized virtue-signalling illustrates

THEIR CONTEMPT

FOR THE

PUBLIC PURSE

Nor would a genuinely self-confident Conservative government allow mass immigration on its current destructive scale.

The latest official figures show that

625,000

migrants settled here in the last year putting an intolerable strain on our civic infrastructure. Supporters of open borders like to extol the economic contribution made by new arrivals, but according to the Office  for National Statistics only

33 PER CENT

of them, little more than a third, were actually seeking work.

It is the same everywhere. The social revolution started by Tony Blair's  Labour  continues under May's Conservatives. So a nominally Tory  government imposes endless bureaucratic equality audits , obsesses about diversity, blathers about the fictional "gender pay gap" fuels the triumph of the aggressive transgender ideology and allows the erosion of

FREE SPEECH

ACROSS OUR PUBLIC LIFE.

None of this will help the Conservatives retain power. Due to their incompetence over

BREXIT

there could be a general election soon, but they will not win in aping  the Labour Party.

The rediscovery of the traditional Tory ideals of pragmatism, competence and patriotism offer a  far surer route to

VICTORY.

 

[BUT NOT WITH EU ENTHUSIAST THERESA MAY AT THE HELM-HER CREDIBILITY HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED WITHOUT REPAIR.]

 

 

* * *

 THIS MOST TIMELY AND ENLIGHTENING AND INFORMATIVE ARTICLE GIVES A CLEAR PICTURE OF PAST AND PRESENT SITUATION . AS OBSERVERS OF THE POLITICAL SCENE FOR DECADES WE HAVE SEEN THIS GATHERING MOMENTUM AS THE YEARS PASSED. ONCE A NATION LOSES ITS CONNECTION WITH ITS PAST THEN THE FUTURE WILL FALL INTO CHAOS AND CONFUSION.

 

 

News for DAILY EXPRESS-TORIES ARE PARALISED... TOO INEPT TO DEAL WITH CRIME AND DEBT by LEO McKINSTRY

Tories are paralysed, too inept to deal with crime and debt, says LEO MCKINSTRY

DECEMBER 3,2018

[ COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1757

 

It's one of Europe's most proudly liberal nations. So why is Denmark

 

banning the burka and

 

threatening to end benefits for migrants whose children

 

 

don't integrate?

  • 'Ghetto' Mjolnerparken is set to be ‘eradicated’ by 2030,
  • following the introduction of
  • controversial laws aimed at protecting ‘Danishness’
  • All families in ghettos will send toddlers to day centres to learn
  • Danish values
  • Non-Western immigrants grown from 50,000 in 1980 to almost
  • 500,000 today 

 

e-mail

 

View
comment

 

 

 

Juicy pomegranates are piled outside the entrance to a supermarket in Norrebro, a district of Copenhagen. There are queues of customers at the till most of the day and into the early hours, buying Middle Eastern pastries, exotic fruit, dates and ice-cream which remind them of home.

Yet beside the pomegranates is a deep hole in the metal door frame. It was made one night by a bullet fired from a 9mm pistol by a member of a drug gang guarding his trading pitch near by.

Ismail Schbaita, a 55-year-old originally from Palestine who helps runs the supermarket, remembers the chilling moment last March only too well. ‘The gunman was high on drugs. Luckily, his bullet missed the staff and the customers. Gangs are always shooting each other around here.’

For Norrebro is a dangerous area of the Danish capital. A stone’s throw from the supermarket is the city’s most notorious housing estate, Mjolnerparken, where mothers told me this week they are afraid to let their children walk to the sweet shop alone because of the knifings and shootings.

Mjolnerparken, with its drab apartment blocks and shabby streets, has been categorised as a ghetto by the Danish Government.

 

Zaynab (centre, pictured with friends Amira and Sabrina) lives in Mjolnerparken, Copenhagen's most notorious housing estate, which has been categorised as a ghetto by the Danish Government

 

These ghettos are due to be ‘eradicated’ by 2030, following the introduction of controversial laws aimed at protecting ‘Danishness’ and ridding the country of so-called ‘parallel’ societies (pictured: Mjolnerparken)

Across the country, 21 other such places with high crime rates, soaring unemployment and more than 50 per cent non-Western residents have been given the same name. They are due to be ‘eradicated’ by 2030, following the introduction of controversial laws aimed at protecting ‘Danishness’ and ridding the country of so-called ‘parallel’ societies.

Later this year, legislation will force all families living in these ghettos to send their toddlers, as young as one year old, to approved day centres to learn the Danish language and Danish values.

The children will have to complete 25 hours of compulsory state education and, while the primary focus will be on language skills and learning, the plan is to educate the mainly Muslim children in the Danish way of life, as well as to give instruction on religious holidays, Christmas and Easter, and their importance in the Christian calendar.

Parents who fail to sign up have been told they could lose their child benefits.

This is the radical policy of a government that, like so many others in Europe, has accepted hundreds of thousands of migrants over recent years and is trying desperately to tackle the problems of integration. Indeed, the challenges Denmark is wrestling with are replicated across the EU as countries including Greece, Italy, Austria and Germany struggle to assimilate large numbers of

 

 

 

 

One disturbing common factor in these countries has been the emergence of strong far-Right political parties, and a return of the kind of ugly nationalism many hoped had died after World War II.

Denmark has long been proud of its reputation as a liberal, tolerant nation. But the fact that it has been forced to introduce tough laws to accelerate integration of migrants shows such tolerance has its limits.

Inevitably, some say the new laws are ‘racist’. They include a burka ban from next month, with fines of up to £1,200 for repeat transgressors. In the inner-city ghettos — where last year two thirds of residents were non-Western immigrants — there will be double the normal penalties for those who commit crimes.

Police will be given the freedom to conduct more intense surveillance of residents in order to curb extremism and violence, while migrant parents who send older children on trips back to their home countries in the Middle East and Africa could face four-year jail sentences if suspected of radicalisation.

The centre-Right Prime Minister, Lars Lokke Rasmussen, says these new laws are necessary because the number of first and second-generation non-Western immigrants has grown from 50,000 in 1980 to almost 500,000 today — a sizeable proportion, in a country of only 5.7 million people.

Rasmussen has said: ‘People with the same problems have clumped together. We have (until now) let it go, perhaps with the naive idea that integration would happen on its own over time ... but it hasn’t.’

 

Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen says these new laws are necessary because the number of first and second-generation non-Western immigrants has grown from 50,000 in 1980 to almost 500,000 today — a sizeable proportion, in a country of only 5.7 million people 

Inger Stojberg, the hardline integration minister, has gone further. The crackdown on ghettos — a word with awful Nazi overtones, to which the Danish policymakers seem oblivious — is a centrepiece of her legislative reforms.

When Stojberg clocked up her 50th amendment to the laws relating to migrants, she baked a celebratory cake and posted a smiling picture of herself with it online.

All this sounds very un-Danish. Yet more and more people here — even some migrants — seem to agree with her. Mr Schbaita, at the bullet-hit supermarket, told me: ‘It is too late to stop the problem of parallel societies in my lifetime. But I hope the new laws will help future generations live together.

‘The problems in the ghettos are caused by ignorance about Western ways and a lack of education.’

He says employers won’t hire anyone who says they live in Mjolnerparken. This means the residents are often poor, at a loose end and ‘turn to crime’.

He says migrants were originally placed in Mjolnerparken because the Government wanted to give the mainly Muslim incomers a sense of community. ‘It was a humanitarian act, a kindness. But now the politicians are asking what went wrong in this part of town.’

Mr Schbaita left Palestine for Moscow to train as a pharmacist before arriving in Denmark, where he married a fellow Muslim and raised a family.

His solution to the problems is to pull down the ghettos. But he is concerned that the new laws are being pushed by a small political elite who unfairly blame Muslims for all the country’s wrongs.

He may be right. Yet indigenous Danes have shown remarkable enthusiasm for the changes.

One of Inger Stojberg’s most popular ideas is for migrants who have lived in Denmark for more than three years to pay for translators’ services when visiting a doctor, rather than relying on the State.

She says: ‘Unless we dare to make demands on foreigners, we will fail to address the serious problems of parallel societies where people neither work nor speak the language and don’t have Danish values.

‘A good place to start is to give back responsibility to those who have come here: learn the language or pay for your interpreter.’

In a poll by the newspaper B.T., 93 per cent of Danes questioned agreed with the minister’s plan.

Miles away from the ghettos, on the outskirts of Copenhagen, there are quiet, well-ordered towns where daily life appears, at first glance, untroubled by the controversies over migration.

 

Inger Stojberg, the hardline integration minister, has gone further. The crackdown on ghettos is a centrepiece of her legislative reforms. When Stojberg clocked up her 50th amendment to the laws relating to migrants, she baked a cake and posted a picture of herself with it online

One of them is Hvidovre, where there is no mosque and the old Protestant church with the Danish flag flying proudly outside on a manicured lawn has a flourishing 7,000-strong membership.

Yet even here immigration is a heated topic.

‘People are afraid of the consequences,’ said Annette Bjerregaard, 54, who works at the church. ‘If they feel people are integrating, they are positive. If not, they are not so positive.’

Annette’s son went to what was known among local Danes as ‘the white school’, where all the pupils were ethnic Danes. In this part of town there are neat privately owned homes, shops and pavement cafes.

Yet a mile away in a poorer part of Hvidovre it is very different. Here 5,000 people, both foreigners and Danes, live together in a sprawling council-run housing estate.

Larry Ellis, a debonair 65-year-old resident with a shock of white hair, works as a gardener at the local university. Having finished his shift, he is relaxing with friends outside the estate’s community centre.

They all agree there are too many migrants coming to Denmark. ‘That is the problem and it has not been addressed for years,’ he says.

‘Even here, we are housed in different parts of the estate to the migrants. The council has put ethnic Danes in blocks on one side of the road and Muslims in blocks on the other. We just don’t mix, and religion is part of it.’

This does not bode well for the Government’s efforts to encourage integration. And indeed, some Danes want to crack down against migrants still harder.

As the mainstream politicians react to a growing sense of disillusion about mass migration, a new party led by a 42-year-old architect called Pernille Vermund has seized the moment.

The divorced mother of three, who lives far from the Copenhagen ghettos, hopes her party — the New Right — will gain seats in elections next year on a hardline anti-migrant manifesto.

It calls for the residence permit of any ‘foreigner convicted in court’ to be withdrawn and for no more welfare benefits, housing subsidies and other state payments to anyone except Danish citizens.

She told me: ‘Politicians for decades have let people into our country who do not share our values. They do not assimilate. Now the politicians make a patchwork of rules to try to correct their own mistakes. Forcing Muslim mothers to deliver their toddlers into state-run daycare is not going to make them Danish, or less Muslim. It simply will not work.’

Her views would have been condemned as xenophobic extremism in liberal Denmark a few years ago. But mass immigration has hardened attitudes.

Politicians fear that if they ignore the problem, they will lose ground to parties such as the New Right.

 

Miles away from the ghettos, there are quiet, well-ordered towns, including Hvidovre (pictured) where daily life appears untroubled by the controversies over migration. There is no mosque and the old Protestant church has a flourishing 7,000-strong membership. Yet even here immigration is a heated topic

Back in Mjolnerparken, where 1,752 people of 38 nationalities live cheek by jowl, I meet one of the community elders.

An Iraqi Kurd by birth, smartly dressed Taher Mustafah, 59, came to Denmark in 1985. He has worked for years as a civil servant and helped run an Islamic charity.

We stand on a busy street corner to chat, as Danish girls in skimpy shorts cycle past women with veiled faces shepherding children along pavements, closely watched over by their husbands. Truly, it is a stark clash of cultures.

Taher looks at one of the veiled women and shakes his head.

‘I know her,’ he says. ‘She is Tunisian and her husband is an Iraqi. My view is that if you live in a country, you should show respect for the society in which you live. She should not wear the burka here in Denmark and soon she will not be allowed to.’

Yet nearby, in an Iraqi-owned cafe, I hear a different opinion from an Iraqi migrant father called Jaber Saleh, 40, who is eating a pitta bread-and-hummus lunch with his wife Farah, 29, and son Hassan, six.

The Salehs are angry with the Danish Government. Despite living and working here as a truck driver for 17 years, Jaber has still not been granted citizenship.

Since the day he arrived, he has clung to his roots. He sent his son to an Arabic school in Copenhagen until it was closed by the Government, which accused some staff of having links to terrorism.

‘The Government was wrong,’ says Jaber. ‘It was a good school where Hassan was taught in the Arabic language, not Danish, and he learnt the Koran. He speaks Arabic at home and has no Danish friends, and I am pleased about that. I don’t want him to learn from them bad things, the swearing, the low moral code of Denmark.

‘This society is too lax. I will do anything to avoid my son learning the values of Denmark.’

As I help Hassan write his name in the English alphabet in my notebook, I wonder what life will bring for this bright, well-behaved child, growing up torn between two cultures.

His family are not preparing him for life as a Dane and, in a rapidly changing country, he may never be accepted as one even if he wishes to be.

And that surely spells trouble for him and his adopted nation. 

 

e-mail

 

View
comment

 

 

 

 

  *  *  *

 

Hijab by country - Wikipedia

 

*

H.F.1621

 *  *  *
 

 

Daily Mail

 

 

 

 

After paying £300 for treatment in the US, RICHARD LITTLEJOHN... - November 11-2016

Why should

We all cough up for foreign health tourists

 

EXTRACT

...SOME NHS staff simply refuse on principle to ask foreign nationals for payment. They think the

HEALTH SERVICE should be FREE for EVERYONE

no matter where they come from in the world, and salve their own Leftie consciences with

TAXPAYER'S MONEY.

So it was absolutely predictable that the usual suspects would bitch and moan about these new proposals, condemning them as heartless and, naturally raaayist!

BUT WHY SHOULD FOREIGNERS WHO NEVER PAID A PENNY INTO THE SYSTEM EXPECT TO RECEIVE NHS TREATMENT GRATIS?

All visitors to our shores should be required to carry medical insurance and produce it when they pass through

IMMIGRATION

If I'd presented myself at a doctor's surgery in the US demanding

FREE TREATMENT

I'd be turned away, Quite right, too...

Full article

...ALSO find out about the GREEN MOVEMENT-Onshore windmills have and still are murdering millions of birds in the name of saving the PLANET...

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

NOVEMBER 11-2016

H. F.1030 BREXIT NOW

 

 

*  *  *

 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 13

/Of 28 sections.

AUGUST 2005

ISLAMIC JIHAD

The Islamic Jihad of the 7th to 10th centuries over-ran half of the then Christian World by the sword. Today, many western Muslims are peaceful and law-abiding, and those who are faithful to the Quran and to the Hadith may well stand beside Christians in campaigns against Materialism and immorality.

Equally, they can take the view that the decadent 'Christian' west is regarded as Dar-al-Harb (house of war). pagan and irredeemable. Only jihad, in the latter view, will bring 'peace' by the establishment of a new Khilafah (a Muslim state) worldwide and by the abolition of national boundaries to result in Izhaar ud-Deen (world domination by Islam).

Islamic states are at the forefront of persecution of Christians, a fact well documented by Operation Mobilisation, Barnabas Fund, Christian Solidarity and Frontline Fellowship amongst other Christian groups.  This topic alone would warrant a book about it and there is truly no space here to begin to do the subject the justice it deserves.

Even in non-Muslim countries, Islam shows its aggressive side, and this is putting the bombings in places like New York, Bali, Madrid, London and Israel on one side.  In Nigeria, Muslims are advancing Sha'ria and persecuting Christians, driving them out of Muslim areas by force of arms. In Australia, Muslims used the State of Victoria's Anti-Vilification Law to persecute Paster Daniel Scot when he described the persecution of Christians in Pakistan and described Islamic beliefs.  At the University of Pretoria, in South Africa, Frontline Fellowship Field Director, Timothy Keller, was threatened by a mob of Muslim students demanding that a missions display be taken down.  In the United Kingdom, author Salman Rushdie became the subject of a death sentence for writing his book "The Satanic Verses" and the arts and media worlds are terrified of offending Muslims.  And with good reason - Dutch film-maker Theo van Gogh was murdered because he released a film criticising Islam and the oppression of women in arranged marriages.  His murderer, Mohammed Bouyeri, is unrepentant.

Believers are held in Islam by fear, making the Quranic promise that there is no compulsion empty. Mohammed said 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.' (Bukhari: Volume 4, book 52, Number 260, Narrated Ikrima.)

Apostasy is punishable by death today in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Yemen, Iran, Sudan, Pakistan and Mauritania.  Of point to us in evangelism is that the penalty for a Muslim converting to Christianity in Britain is still theoretically death.  Even if a convert's Muslims neighbours stop short of killing him, Muslim converts in Britain suffer severe persecution.  The Barnabas Fund estimate that some 3,000 Christian converts from Islam are in danger in the UK.  They include Nissar Hussain and his family from Bradford; his car was burnt out, he has endured bricks thrown through his windows, threats to burn his house down and much else.

 

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/14/1

 

 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 17/1

AUGUST 2005

THE 'COVENANT OF SECURITY'

The Islamic concept of a 'Covenant of Security' means two things. Firstly, unbelievers who pay the Jizyah are entitled to the provision of security from the Khilafah, and secondly, a non-Islamic nation which provides shelter to Muslims is not regarded as Dar-al-Harb. It is the second meaning which is relevant to Britain today.

In practice, as long as Britain sheltered Islamic terrorists planning strikes against their own governments, and did not make war against islamic lands, Britian was safe from attack.  The turning of London into Londonistan, a haven for foreign jihadists, made Britain, in a perverse kind of way, a safer place.

Chief among advocates of the 'Covenant of Security' was Skeikh Omar Bakri, leader of al-Muhajiroun. The head of its Luton branch, Sayful Islam, said in April 2004 that he supported Osama Bin Laden "100 per cent" in the quest to achieve

"the worldwide domination of Islam"

but he would not engage in terror attacks in Britain

"as long as they allow us Muslims to live here in peace."

All that changed as events unfolded in 2004 as a result of 9/11.

The British Government arrested certain foreign nationals on suspicion of inciting terrorism, and, unable for human rights reasons to deport them, kept them interned without trial.

The second factor was Britain's active support in the American invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

In January 2005 Bakri determined that the covenant of security had ended and "the whole of Britain had become Dar-al-Harb."

British Muslims were obliged "to join the global Islamic camp against the global crusader camp" the latter of which included Britain. Six months later, the bombing campaign in London began.

Other British jihadists took a different line. Hassan Butt left al Muhajiroun because he disagreed that British-born Muslims were bound by the same covenant of security felt by foreigners, such as Bakri himself.  In an interview, Butt said British-born Muslim youth have no allegiance to this country: "Islamically, I agree that someone who runs from the Middle East-where people like me are persecuted-and says, 'Britain, I want you to protect me' has entered a covenant of security. They  say, 'look protect my life and as a result I won't do any harm to you.' That  I agree with 100 per cent, but most of our people, especially the youth are British citizens... They did not ask to be born here; neither did they ask to be protected by Britain....They  have no covenant. As far as I'm concerned, the Islamic hukum (order) that I follow, says that a person has no covenant whatsoever with the country in which they are born." (Prospect Magazine August 2005)

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/14/1

 

 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 14/1

AUGUST 2005

ORIGINS OF MODERN MUSLIM TERRIORISM

Islamic terrorism in its present form can trace its roots to the foundation of Muslim Brotherhood in 1928 in Egypt.  Previous historical events were Britain's promise of a Arab homeland to T.E Lawrence's Arab army in 1916-17, the way Britain and France were meanwhile dividing up the middle east in the Sykes Picot Agreement of 1916., which meant the promise given to and by Lawrence was worthless, the defeat of the Ottoman Empire by Allenby in 1917, the end of the Ottoman Califate when the modern state of Turkey was established in 1924, the setting up of the Turkish Grand National Assemble or Parliament and British occupation of Egypt.  These all contributed to the establishment of the Muslim Brotherhood.  In the 1940's one of its leaders, the Egyptian literary critic Sayd Qutb, spent two years in America, an experience which turned him solidly against the West in general. Before his execution in Egypt in 1966, he wrote a book entitled 'Milestone' which is available on the internet at YoungMuslims Canada.

It was Qutb who developed the modern ideas of Jihad, and writing about Sura 9:111 and Allah's bargain fo the Shahid, he chids those who will not accept it: "The deal fills us with awe. Yet those who are claiming to be Muslims everywhere...are sitting idle, unwilling to strive hard in order to establish the fundamental truth of Allah's Lordship on earth, or to remove the tyranny which usurps the qualities of Lordship over human life on earth [ie non-islamic governments].  They are unwilling to fight, kill and be killed in Allah's cause."Outb reminds jihadists that they should rejoice in the bargain, just as the Quran says the followers of Mohammed did: "Ye did indeed wish for death before ye met him" (Sura 3:143). He asserts that they should hope for death in battle, and encourages modern mujihadeen to seek death in nthe worldwide jihad- or 'struggle' - to impose Islam and eliminate its enemies.

According to the NubaSurvival website, Qurb, the Indo-Pakistani radical Abu al-Ala Al Mawdudi and the Ayatollah Imam Khomeini were the three prime sources of modern militant Islamic theocratic ideology. Mawdudi saw Western morality as barbarian, and argued for the imposition of an Islamic state. Khomeini told a conference of Islamic clerics in 1981: "Quran says kill, imprison. Why are you only clinging to the part that talks of mercy?" He said: Those who know nothing bof Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those {who] say [this] are witless. Islam says: Kill al the unbelievers just as they would kill you all!... Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword."

Quarb saw unrestrained capitalism, individualism, promiscuity, decadence and globalisation as threats to Islam, rather as we might see them as threats to Christianity.  His answer was to revive the old ideas of expansion, and to propose, contrary to Arab nationalists, that the homeland Muslims should fight for not a piece of land but the whole Dar-al-islam. It followed that any part of the world which hampered the spread of Islam or failed to operate Sha'ria was Dar-al-Harb.  Another member of the Muslim Brotherhood was Abdullah Azzam, a Palestinian university professor who became the mentor of Osama Bin Laden.  Bin Laden himself is said to be or have been a members of the Muslim Brotherhood, but with so many other connections to the Brotherhood, it hardly matters.

So islamic terrorism is relatively new, but the intellectuals who have developed it have built it on foundations which are solidly in the Quran and Hadith.

 

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/14/1

 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 2

AUGUST 2005

THE FOUNDING OF ISLAM

 

Islam as founded in the seventh century AD by Abdul-Kasim Mohammed ibn Abd Allah. Mohammed was born in  Mecca in Arabia in 570 AD and was a member of the Quraish tribe, who worshipped the moon-god, 'Al-ilah', and a variety of other pagan deities. Orphaned at an early age, he was brought up by his uncle. Abu Talib.  He married his first wife, Khadija, when he was 25 and she 40. She was the widow of a rich merchant in whose caravan Mohammed was travelling and the pair became devoted to each other. With his wealth and travelling lifestyle, he acquired some knowledge of both Judaism and Christianity.  In 610 AD, Mohammed claimed to have had a vision of what he believed was the angel Gabriel. Mohammed was an intelligent man but he could not read or write, so he had scribes write down that and further visions.  In time these became the Quran, in which was developed the monotheistic concept of Allah as an omnipotent creator who alone was to be worshipped.

Not surprisingly, Mohammed's insistence, in the words of the Quran that "No god is there but the one Allah" (Sura 38:65), set he and his small band of followers against the majority in Mecca.  The pagan Ka'aba shrine in Mecca was an important focus for pilgrimage. the tourism industry was important even then and vital to Mecca.  The incident of the 'Satanic Verses' which established the principle of 'Naskh' (qv) made life even more uncomfortable for Mohammed.

In 620 AD, following the sudden deaths of both his first wife and his uncle and protector, Mohammed found himself and the Hashemite clan of which he was a member coming under a degree of persecution in Mecca.  He quickly married another widow, Sawda, and shortly afterwards married a girl named Ayesha. her father, Abu Bakr, was devoted to Mohammed and would emerge as first caliph,(successor to Mohammed). Mohammed further married Hafsah, daughter of Umar, second caliph, Mohammed's daughter or step-daughter Umm Kulthum married third caliph Uthman, and Mohammed's certain daughter Fatima by his first wife Khadijah was married to his cousin Ali, the fourth caliph.  (Shi-ite Muslims believe only Ali was a true caliph.) Mohammed went on to marry another twelve women, but none bore him surviving children. His three sons, two born by Kadijah and one of his concubine Mary the Copt, all died in infancy.

 

 

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/2

 

 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 4/2

AUGUST 2005

ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY DIFFER

ISLAM honours six main prophets: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus (Isha) and Mohammed, of whom Mohammed is considered the final and greatest of them all.  In the doctrine of Fitrah,  Muslims believe human beings are born good and then corrupted by outside influences, rather than born evil and redeemed  by God, as Christianity teaches.  Mohammed appeared to believe that every child is born Muslim and made Jewish or Christian by his parents. Substitutionary sacrifice has no place in Islam, which is a religion of works and outward show. One's good deeds have to outnumber one's bad deeds in order to gain admittance to the Islamic paradise (Sura 9:102) but Allah "punishes whom he pleases and he forgives whom he pleases" (Sura 5:40).

 Muslim folk law is that an angel sits on a man's right shoulder recording his good deeds and one on his left records his bad deeds.  There is no certainty of forgiveness in Islam, all is on the whim of Allah.  Neither is there any recognition that sin separates us from God, and therefore there is no need of reconciliation. there is the concept of sin, because Muslims know the Black Stone absorbs sins, but that sins can be forgiven by the merits of a divine Saviour is anathema to Allah.

Islam denies the Gospel account of the crucifixion, the very foundation of Christianity.  The Quran blames the Jews for killing the prophets (Sura 4:155) but two verses later has the Jews boasting that they killed 'Christ Jesus the son of Mary' and says "They killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them... of a surety they killed him not" (Sura 4: 157)

From the principle of tawhid , worshipping another, such as Jesus, is the gravest sin anyone can commit against Allah (Sura 4:48)The Holy Trinity is an abomination in Islam, even though the Holy Spirit is mentioned in the Quran as strengthening Jesus (2:87,253;5:110) and revealing the Quran itself (Sura 16:102)  However, it is possible that Mohammed thought Christians worshipped God, Mary as Jesus, as "Say not Trinity" is in a verse conc4erning Mary and Jesus (Sura 4:171). In any event, the Quran denounces as blasphemous any thought that Jesus in particular is equal to Allah (Sura 5:17,71, 75,116).  Islam even teaches that Mohammed, not the Holy Spirit. is the praiseworthy comforter whom  Jesus  would send (Sura 61:6).

The Quran insists Jesus is merely the son of Mary (Sura 2:87;3:45;5:78;33:7) and definitely not the son of Allah (Sura 9:30), although conceived miraculously in Mary's virginity (Sura 19:20), because it is beneath the glory of Allah even to have a son (Sura 4:171;19:34-35;112:3). The Quran has Jesus worshipping (Sura 4:172. and urging the worship )of Allah (Sura 3:525;112;43:63), acknowledging Allah as sole provider (Sura 5:115), puts Allah above Jesus (Sura 3:55), says that Allah taught Jesus the Gospel (Sura 3:48;5:46,110), says Jesus was just a man (Sura 3:59), who did not bring glad tidings' (Sura 5:19 not to be held up as an example (Sura 43:57) and not to be worshipped (Sura 9:31) no more than a messenger (Sura 2:87;5:75) or a prophet (Sura2:136;3:54;33:7;42:13) who prophesised that Mohammed and even urged the disciples, who were Muslims, as it happens, to be helpers of Allah (Sura 3:52;61:14). would come after him (Sura 61:6).

 

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/9

 

 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 14

AUGUST 2005

A WORLDWIDE ISLAMIC STATE

 The idea of the Khilafah is strong in Islam, and is the driving force of numerous organisations and websites, such as www.hizh.org.uk, www.Hizb-ut-Tahrir.org, www.Khilafah.com, www.ummah.org.uk, and the recently pulled www.islamic-sata.org and www.ghurabaa.co.uk.  Both Communisism and Islam have as their goal the establishment of a global state embodying their ideals.  In contrast, Christianity  from its Jewish roots teaches a division of nations (Gen 10:5; Acts 17:6)m in part to,restrain the ambitions of sinful men (Gen 11:4-9, Psalm 2).  It is of course true that in Christianity we find the concept of a millennnial kingdom of peace and justice.  Jesus Christ establishes His reign, ruling with an iron rod, and his enemies become his footstool (Psalm 2, Psalm 110;  Mark 12:36; Heb 1:13).

It may be argued that the Millennium is a spiritual event, unlike Islamic rule, which is temporal, but that is not the whole story.  Christians should be prepared to say that the establishment of the righteous laws of God in any commonwealth or nation would be a good thing. The judicial laws revealed by God to the Patriarchs, Moses and the Prophets were not to be kept solely by Israel, but were truly intended as a model for all nations: "And what nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgments so righteous as all this law, which I set before you this day?" (Deut 4:8) "He shall not fail nor be discouraged, till he have set judgment in the earth; and the isles shall wait for his law" (Isa 42:4).

Obviously, a Muslim should and will be enthusiastic for Islamic Law, Sha'ria, as Christians are (or should be) for Christian law, and of course much more inclined to work for its establishment by force. It is difficult to find Muslims who will argue that we live in a liberal democracy and that secular humanism should form the basis for our law-making, as is sadly prevalent in some Christian circles.

There are observant Muslims, and non observant Muslims, but a moderate Muslim is hard to find and even a non-observant Muslim will still believe at some level in the Khilafah, defend the Ummah and revere a martyr in the cause of jihad.

It also must be asked, if those who terrorised Nissar Hussain in Bradford were not ordinary Muslims, what were they? Or the Nigerian Muslims terrorising Christians? Or those at Pretoria University who objected to the Frontline mission? If they were ordinary Muslims, the level of tolerance in Islam is set extremely low.  Observant Muslims believe the Quran, and they believe that Sha'ria is wholly good, and is destined to be enforced worldwide in a Khilafah.  That is what the Quran says and it is supposed to be the culmination of and successor to the Bible. So how does Sha'ria compare to the Biblical laws of God?

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/9

How immigration killed off Sweden’s liberal dream as violence and uncertainty replace tolerance and stability

Mark Almond — Daily Mail Sept 9, 2018

Migrant no-go zones have become a fact of life in Malmo, Sweden. A problem that local politicians seem unable to acknowledge. Click to enlarge

Migrant no-go zones have become a fact of life in Malmo, Sweden. A problem that local politicians seem unable to acknowledge. Click to enlarge

Whatever the eventual outcome of the election, Sweden’s image as an ultra-liberal and stable democracy that’s only too happy to welcome new arrivals from around the globe has been irreparably damaged.

The fiercely anti-immigrant, blatantly nationalistic Sweden Democrat party – which has only recently abandoned its neo-Nazi roots – has sharply increased its share of the vote since the last election and possibly become the country’s second largest.

And while the left-of-centre Social Democrats which have dominated Swedish politics for decades remain the largest party, they will now find it very difficult to form a majority coalition that supports their liberal agenda on welfare and immigration.

It is the Social Democrats who were behind Sweden’s cradle-to-grave welfare policies where high taxes paid for a very high standard of services. The liberal Social Democrats ushered in unprecedented mass immigration. There could be no more dramatic evidence that this election result to demonstrate how the public mood has soured as a result of those policies.

The open-door policy for refugees – with as many as 165,000 immigrants arriving in 2015 alone in a country of fewer than ten million – has radically changed the composition of big cities like Stockholm or Malmo. A survey by the respected Pew Research Centre predicts that if the high migration rates continue, 30.6 per cent of the Swedish population will be Muslim by 2050. Its researchers estimated the proportion in 2016 at 8.1 per cent.

The influx has strained welfare budgets and caused resentment just as global economic challenges smashed Sweden’s previous blue chip companies like Saab, causing job insecurity and static pay.

Tolerance and stability have been replaced by violence and uncertainty, and across Swedish cities such as Gothenburg and Stockholm, cars have been set ablaze. All this played into the hands of the Sweden Democrats who blamed everything from welfare waiting lists to crimes like rape and arson on the migrants. All highly emotive and often unproven – but the nationalists played the message dramatically to their advantage.

The death of Sweden’s liberal dream has seen young professionals leave the country for well-paid but lower-taxed jobs elsewhere in the EU. Instability in Northern Europe worries NATO just as it looks just across the Baltic Sea towards an increasingly belligerent Russia. Sweden may be officially neutral but everyone knows its neutrality tilts towards the West.

Its recent drift towards joining NATO now looks likely to run aground. This is because populist parties in Sweden – whether on the Right or Left – admire Putin as a strong man who, in contrast to the ‘wishy-washy’ West, stands firm against immigration and the perceived dilution of national cultures.

Putin’s Russia will be watching gleefully as Sweden’s politics frays at both edges. Ordinary Russians have traditionally viewed Sweden’s social democracy as an ideal alternative to the Soviet model with its bountiful welfare provisions plus freedom and prosperity.

The fact that this once model Western democracy is now floundering can only help boost Putin’s image domestically as the leader upholding a stable Russian regime.

The Sweden Democrats’ triumph will also trouble Brussels and the EU. The party has called for a referendum on membership of the union. After the general election, Sweden’s conventional parties will try to return to politics as usual and form a coalition government.

But if they exclude the Sweden Democrats from government, they will have to cobble together their coalition from parties which have long been political enemies – which will infuriate those parties’ natural supporters and encourage the drift towards the populist Right and Left.

The problems of Sweden’s welfare state, its migration woes plus the general downward pressure on ordinary living standards show no sign of disappearing in the country – or, for that matter, anywhere else in Europe.

Failure to come first will not worry the nationalist Sweden Democrats who have massively increased their vote in this election. They fully expect to celebrate victory after the next.

Source

*  *  *

[ IT WAS BOUND TO HAPPEN BECAUSE AS SHOWN IN OTHER ONCE FREE NATION STATES WITHIN

HITLER'S EU

 THE SETTLED PEOPLES FINALLY UNDERSTOOD THE MEANING OF NATIONALITY ONLY WHEN THEIR VERY OWN CULTURE WAS UNDER THREAT.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!.]

Daily Mail Sept 9, 2018

H.F.1692

 Brought forward from: March 5-2008.

British Governments were wrong in their Foreign Policy towards the Arabs in Palestine as they have been since 1972  about the European Union.

In both cases the British Governments had ignored the concerns of the people with broken promises and deceit. The result in Palestine can be seen with the constant state of war between the Israelis and the Muslim population. The consequences with regard to the decision to join the EU was again a deceitful affair which has been so up to the signing of the

TREATY of TREASON

in the House of Commons on March 5-2008.

Blair says he will strive for Peace in the Middle East-BUT HE is the BARRIER to that PEACE.

*

FOREWARD

Palestine

One of the strangest developments of the Great War in its later stages was the important part played by the Holy Land.   Palestine, sacred to all the faiths that have had their rise in the Near East, was the land where the war reached a decision. It was the capture by the British of this ancient country, held in reverence by the heart of the world, that finally convinced the war-makers that their plans had utterly failed.  General Allenby ther finally broke down the Turkish resistance and the allies of Germany fell away from her one by one.

As part of the Peace Settlement it was resolved by the Allied Powers that the world should take Palestine under its guardianship and establish it as a self-governing State.   Accordingly a Mandate was allotted to Great Britain with a view to the Holy Land being regarded as

"a national home for the Jewish people without prejudice to the civil and religious  rights of existing non-Jewish communities."

A scheme of government was accordingly drawn up whereby it was hoped that  the large Arab population,  and the considerable Jewish and Christian populations, would unite to work an enlightened system of self-government just and tolerant to all.  Sir Herbert Samuel was appointed High Commissioner, and for the wise government of the country Great Britain became responsible , under the League of Nations.  The population of the territory in 1922 was

757,182

Of this number

590,890

were

MUSLIMS

 

83,794

were

JEWS

 

73,024

were

CHRISTIANS

[The total population of Palestine grew from 750,000 in 1922 to 1,765,000 in 1944.  The number of Jews rose over the same period from 84,000 to 550,000- from 13 to 31 per cent of the total.]

 

Arrangements  were made for the election of Legislative Council and meantime an Advisory Council was formed to assist the High Commissioner.

The country had been peaceful.  The value of trade increased 40 per cent in three years.   Improvements were introduced in extension of railways, sanitation, education, and other public services.  Mohammedan opinion , however, remained suspicious of Jewish influence, and designs and plans for securing national unity in popular government remained in abeyance.

Palestine under the mandatory government does not include the whole of either the Old testament countries of Israel and Judah or the New Testament area.  A small part of northern Galilee ,and of the northern country beyond  the Jordon, has been included in the in the French mandatory territories of Syria and Lebanon.   But there has been an addition in the south, where Gaza  becomes the centre of the Palestine district.

There area is about 9000 square miles.  There are 80 Jewish colonies in different parts of the country, in which 18,000 Jews are settled.   The Arab villages number about 750 in all.

The country is arranged in four districts from north to south, namely, Galilee, with the port of Haifa, having a population of 25,000, as its chief town; Samaria, whose chief town is Nablus, with a populationof 16.000; Judaea with Jerusalem, 63,000; and the southern district, Gaza, 17,500; and Bethleham , 6,600.  Jerusalem, of course is the capital, and the centre of government for the whole country. . .

Though Palestine is a land of rock and wilderness in parts, and its one considerable river, the Jordon, runs through such a deeply cut valley that it is useless for irrigation, the country in many districts is capable of cultivation  to a high standard of fruitfulness.   It might conceivably sustain a population of two millions (1922). More could not be expected, however scientifically the land's resources were developed.   It could never, therefore be a national home for more than a fraction of the Jewish people, who now number twelve millions.

The truth respecting the Jews and Palestine is that while the genius of that intellectual people, and the intensity of their religion, have associated them for ever with the country they once ruled, their possession of it was only a brief in comparison with the length of time they claim in history.   Their forefathers must have entered the land about 3000 years ago (in 1922), but their tenure of it as their own, in independence, did not last 500 years; nor were they distinctively associated with it in any way except memory for more than 1000 years.

It was not until till the reign of David that Jerusalem was taken, and in less than 500 years the greater part of his race were in exile. Yet, so deep is the impression they have made on the religions of the world through the literature they produced in Palestine that no other Palestine history except their own holds the world's attention.   Already we have traced the outlines of the history in our stories from the bible.  It is what has been in "these holy fields", not what is, or is likely to be, that matters most gravely to mankind. [Arthur Mee]

*

A POISONOUS IDEOLOGY SAYS BLAIR OF THOSE WHO DIED FOR THEIR CAUSE ON JULY 7-2005.

 

Over the past 60 years we have been here before with the kamikaze pilots of the Second World War and the ideology that their sacrifice was for their Emperor and their Nation.

 

In the aftermath of the last war the British in Palestine faced the extremist units of the Zionist movement with the major loss of life in the destruction of the King David Hotel in Tel Aviv- our Military H.Q.  The final result of the terrorist outrages in Palestine culminated in the creation of the State of Israel in 1948.

 *

  

In the Iran/Iraq War boys had bombs strapped to their bodies so that they could throw themselves onto the tanks.

 

Today we have extreme Islamic Fundamentalists who offer their lives in the belief that Allah understands their actions.

 

In a lengthy and erudite article in the

 Daily Mail on Tuesday, July 12-2005. 

 

Under the heading of:

 

Inside the mind of a

 

SUICIDE BOMBER

 

AN INTERVIEW WITH AN INTENDED SUICIDE BOMBER WHO LATER BECAME A MARTYR IN THE EYES OF HIS ASSOCIATES.

At this time we will quote only the last few paragraphs, which are pertinent to our inquiry: -

 

‘The only person who matters is Allah- and the only question he will ask me is:

 

“How many infidels did you kill?”

 

What explains the appeal of suicide attacks in Iraq?  For one thing, using oneself as a weapon can be a relatively effective tactic against an enemy with far superior firepower.  And the extremist Muslim suicide bombers believe that their sacrifice guarantees them ‘martyrdom’ and a passport to paradise.

 

In Iraq most suicide attacks are thought to have been carried out by foreign fighters.  Insurgent commanders tend to view Iraqi fighters as most valuable alive:  they have extensive supply networks and know the home terrain.

 

These days, however, more and more Iraqis like Marwan - are signing up because the rebels’ tactics now involve deploying a large number of such attackers, which is depleting the supply of foreign volunteers.

 

Robert Pape, author of a book about suicide terrorism, DYING TO WIN, says the tactic has historically been used when two conditions are met.

 

First, insurgents feel they are fighting foreign troops in places they regard as their homeland (Osama Bin Laden, for example, has railed against U.S. bases in the Arabian Peninsula).

And second, when the occupiers come from a different religious background, insurgents are able to paint them as subjugators of their faith and its followers.

 

Those conditions, it turns out, co-exist prominently in the Middle East.

 

Tony Blair and George Bush representing the moral basis of Western Civilisation see no wrong in conspiring and invading an Islamic Country where they had no business to go. 

 

The Iraqi people would say that this is the result of a poisonous Ideology which permits a country to invade their country illegally as it fits the Ideology of the supposed civilised world to act as aggressors.

 

Of course we do not excuse the acts of the insurgents but the fact that they are not afraid to give their lives for their cause does mean that we need to know WHY they took the lives of their own citizens.

 

There are few people in Britain today who do not realise that the reason for the attack on London was our presence in Iraq.

 

As we have said before - if we withdraw from Iraq and put our efforts into finding a solution to the difficulties in the Middle East then we could be the arbiter which we should have been before the Iraq War - a nation that believes in Justice in our International affairs and to have refused the poisoned Ideology which Tony Blair has followed which has finally resulted in the deaths and injury of the innocent in London on July 7 -2005.

 

It will be a disgrace which will haunt our nation for many a long year unless we ALL do what we can to have OUR Parliament impeach Tony Blair and punish those who co-operated in the heinous crime of invading a country without justification.

 

*

In view of the importance of the background to the conflict in the Middle East we have included details of the history of:

 

The Problem of Palestine

By

G. D .H .Cole

1947

 

The cry goes up on all hands that, however the problem of Palestine is solved, the solution ought to be ‘final.’  The Economist wrote, in an article on the subject on August 3rd 1946,  “ a new and influential body of people have come to see that, whatever else a plan for Palestine presents, it must offer a reasonable hope of securing a final settlement.” …

 

The hard core of the Palestine problem is that the territory of Palestine lies right in the middle of group of Arab States.

These States, long accustomed to subjection, have been able of late to assert [1946/7] their independence, and have come together into an Arab League which a point of focus for strong nationalist sentiment.

 

To the North of Palestine lie the republics of Syria and the Lebanon, newly escaped from French rule. 

 

To the East lies the largely desert area of Transjordania, recently recognised by Great Britain, the former mandatory power, as an independent Arab kingdom. 

 

To the South lie the Arab kingdoms of Egypt and Saudi Arabia.  As we have seen, the latter has recently become an important factor in world politics because of the discovery beneath its soil of what is believed the world’s greatest oilfield, for exploitation of which American companies have secured concessions extending over a vast area.

 

The oil question reacts seriously on the problem of Palestine because the natural outlet for pipe-lines to carry oil to the Mediterranean is across Palestine, which has thus become important to American as well as to British politicians for economic as well as political reasons.

 

Last and not least important, to the West of Palestine lies the Mediterranean Sea, whose eastern part forms an important link in Great Britain’s communications with Asia and, even apart from oil, an area of immense strategic importance in the calculations of all statesmen and military authorities who are framing policies with an eye to the possibility of a another War.

 

If the Jews were not , as they are, a highly civilised people with a strong national cultural and religious traditions as any in the world; if they were not, besides this, for the most part a homeless people with their leading personalities scattered over the face of the earth and holding positions of high importance and influence in many States:

 

If they were merely a handful of Levantine tribesmen who had survived after many centuries of Arab conquest and Turkish rule –it would be natural to suppose the development of Arab nationalism would ensure the conversion of Palestine into a State under Arab rule, with Jews living there at best on the terms on which many Jews –the Sephardic Jews- did live there, century after century, under the Turks.

 

But the present Jewish population [1946/47] of Palestine includes, besides the old Jewish inhabitants with their relatively primitive standards of culture, the immigrant Jews who have settled there mainly since the establishment of a new State under British mandate, after the First World War.

 

These settlers are by no means all of high cultural standards, or used to a high standard of living.  Many of them have come from Eastern Europe, and have been used to hard conditions of life.

 

But they are under advanced and cultured leadership and have settled in Palestine under the auspices of World Jewry, which has supplied them with capital to develop their settlements along advanced lines and has enabled them, on the basis of their high national capacity, to create for themselves standards of living a long way above those of the Arab population in the midst of which they have settled down.

 

The Jews have, to a large extent, established themselves on land acquired from Arab owners who had previously made little of it, in Jewish villages founded largely on co-operative principles and carrying on a community life quite apart from that of the Arab population.

 

A substantial number are in Tel-Aviv – a handsome modern town which they have created- and in Haifa, where they have built with Arab as well as Jewish labour, a well-equipped modern port.  Many Jews have maintained-and Jewish Socialists have maintained consistently-that the problem of living together of the people is soluble only by learning to work together under equal conditions, and that accordingly it is indispensable to raise Arab pay and Arab quality of workmanship to a level with Jewish pay and Jewish workmanship.

 

But this has not happened; it demands both time and a deliberate policy of Arab education-to say nothing of a political environment in which stability would be guaranteed.

 

Instead, the two races have for the most part lived their own separate lives, at widely different standards and on a basis of widely different cultures; and both have lived under an alien rule which has meant that neither could feel any sense of responsibility towards the other, or for avoiding action which might make co-operation harder.

 

 Each has been trying, most naturally, to put the maximum of pressure in its own interest upon the alien ruling power [Britain] and every disturbance of world conditions has made for more intense pressure because it has aroused hopes of fishing successfully in troubled waters, and has weakened the resources at the immediate disposal of the mandatory power [Britain].

 

The Population of Palestine

[Pre-1944]

 

Most Jews, as well as most Arabs do not live in Palestine.  [Until 2005 –when over 5,000,000 now live in the State of Israel and a slightly less figure live in the U.S.A.]

 

The total population of Palestine grew from 750,000 in 1922 to 1,765,000 in 1944.  The number of Jews rose over the same period from 84,000 to 550,000- from 13 to 31 per cent of the total.

 

This increase in the Jewish population was due mainly to immigration; for the Jewish inhabitants have a relatively low rate of natural increase.

 

Between 1941 and 1944 the Jewish annual rate of natural increase was 1.8 per cent, whereas the Arab rate was over 3 per cent, and rising sharply.

 

From 1922 to 1925 the comparable rates were 2.per cent for Jews and 2.3 per cent for Palestine Arabs. Thus, the Jewish percentage of the population has risen because of immigration; but in the absence of further immigration it would at once begin to fall off.  If the Arabs could stop Jewish immigration, they could thereby ensure a rapidly increasing numerical preponderance in Palestine society.

 

[There is a great deal to be learnt from the above by our politicians in 2005.  Unfortunately Tony Blair and his cronies are not prepared to learn the lessons from the past which are still with the world and ourselves today.]

 

*

Daily Mail on Tuesday, July 12-2005

 

H.F.730

A MAN of VISION-A LEARNED PATRIOT for whom LONDON DOCKERS MARCHED on WESTMINSTER in his SUPPORT-HISTORY has VALIDATED his FEARS.

*

 

Words

Enoch would never have uttered

 

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail- Friday, November 9, 2007]

 

 

THERE is a long standing form of moral evasion popular among politicians - and some journalists too - which has always intrigued me , if only for its

IMPUDENCE

It involves Enoch Powell's so called 'river of blood' speech in 1968, whose recollection has forced the resignation of the Tory candidate for Halesowen and Rowley Regis. The speech itself, incidentally, was notable for understating the prospective immigrant population.

 

'Ah, yes, you see,' the cry of the political elite has long run (I read it again last week),

'It was that speech , that phrase, which made rational discussion of immigration impossible.'

Note the implication that these people had been indulging in a rational debate on immigration only to be thrown off course by Powell's hand-grenade.

Let me assure you with every fibre of my being that a rational discussion was just what leading politicians were avoiding.

THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

by both front benches

-which drove Powell to fury.

Far from making thoughtful debate impossible, his speech and reaction made it

VERY URGENT

As an admirer and friend of Powell I was myself dismayed by that sanguinary phrase. But the real shock lay in the public reaction.

Dockers from the East End marched on Westminster demanding  to protest at

TED HEATH

sacking Powell from the Shadow Cabinet.

Opinion polls showed massive backing for Powell, to say nothing of the largest politician's postbag on record, in which the overwhelming majority supported him.

THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

sprang from the fact that the problem had become so daunting. Effective action would have to be on a major scale , admit to previous failures and would risk, indeed ensure, denunciation from every pulpit in the land (lay and clerical)

It was easier for politicians and commentators, all secure in their leafy suburbs, to assure the public that the problem would be solved by

INTEGRATION

NOW, however, the genie was out of the bottle. So in the 1970 Tory manifesto Heath promised

'No further large scale permanent immigration'.

BUT

of course, there was.

 

The 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act

 

TOO LITTLE and TOO LATE

had allowed those already here or able to secure work vouchers to bring in their families and 'dependant relatives'.

THEY CAME IN SWARMS

 

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

UNCLES

and

SISTERS

and their

COUSINS

and their AUNTS.

They came from the sub-continent where birth certificates were far form common and anyone could claim a blood relationship. Money readily changed hands. So that Tories changed the law to say that only

Spouses

Fiances

and

Fiancees

would be allowed.

 

But by 1976, the level of intercontinental match-making had reached such a level the Foreign Office dispatched a senior official to the sub-continent to assess the

PROBLEM.

He observed that allowing in married and affianced partners would open up a whole new group of applicants -'subsequently entitling

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

and allegedly distressed

RELATIVES

to seek entry.

IT WOULD BE LIKE BAILING OUT THE OCEAN.

 

SO AN EFFORT was made to tighten up the rules but it was -how did you guess?

TOO LITTLE-TOO LATE

Since Heath's promise

TO CLOSE THE DOOR

more than

3,000,000

non-British immigrants have arrived

IN THIS COUNTRY

And traffic in spouses between such places such as

BRADFORD and BANGALORE

HAS CONTINUED APACE

 

Two other factors have long overhung any rational debate on

IMMIGRATION

Most obvious, in an echo of the Salem witchcraft trials, has been the tactic of pointing at someone and shrieking

'RACIST'

-the sin against the Holy Ghost - and even calling for

POLICE ACTION

Believe me , this accusation has long scared the wits out of

FLEET STREET EDITORS

-their legal departments

media commentators generally and politicians of every shade.

IT HAS BEEN CENSORSHIP BY ANOTHER NAME

-the public has been duly cowed.

A technical problem has added to this because the word

RACE

is SHORT -and EASY to FIT into a HEADLINE -while IMMIGRATION isn't. So arguments about IMMIGRATION were labelled in innumerable headlines as being about

'RACE'

The other problem which hindered meaningful debate was that immigrants had come to form a grouping of such

SIZE and IDENTITY

that politicians on all sides thought well worth wooing, indeed crawling to.

NOW

David Cameron has woken up, in intervals between sacking Tory front benchers and Tory candidates for 'racism' to the Government's vulnerability on

IMMIGRATION.

Ministers have trebled the number of work vouchers available to foreign workers over ten years to a level running at

150,000 a year

 

Cameron has no serious solution to

IMMIGRATION

but as the saying is, every bit helps.

 

The supreme irony of this week's fuss around Powell's 1968 speech is that recently had our supposedly internationalist Prime Minister promising

'BRITISH JOBS for BRITISH WORKERS.

Enoch would not have touched such a phrase with a bargepole.

*

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

[Under PR- Proportional Representation the Immigration levels would have been curtailed because the Government of the Day would feel obliged to take a stronger line in order to gather up the votes and back to power. But as we all know it has been this single-minded attitude of the tripartite in your

HOUSE OF COMMONS

to keep power within their grasp and to hell to any outsiders.

Most of the problems in our society over the past 40 years have occurred because of the determination of the party in power to take what they consider a more lenient line on policy whether it is

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

ABORTION

IMMIGRATION

and no doubt dozens of other matters which has resulted in absolute chaos in the above areas.

If they are able to claw in another small section of the community which will be ready voters they will change anything what ever the consequences to the people and the country.

We have been calling for the introduction of

PR in our PARLIAMENT

for many years as a number of bulletins on our website can testify but the very organisations that could achieve this necessary alteration -the numerous political organisations in our country appear not to be interested. And that is the PROBLEM

and until we change the system we shall see the constant over-regulation by the Government and the hair-brained schemes adopted by the so-called OPPOSITION which lays a path of problems in the future.

Of course if PR had been in place over the last four decades there would not have been the

WAR in IRAQ

or even

Mission Impossible in Afghanistan.

 

The Abortion Bill would only have passed if much greater safeguards had been put in place.

 

Immigration would have been freely discussed and sensible measures adopted to allow controlled entry ONLY and those who were prepared to INTEGRATE and NOT THREATEN the very existence of the COUNTRY that they were adopting.

 

Abolition of Capital Punishment Bill failed to honour the feelings in the country that if the Death Sentence was abolished that MURDER would mean a LIFE SENTENCE where the circumstances warrant it. Even before the abolition of the penalty over 50 per cent of murderers had their sentence commuted to life imprisonment and that didn't mean twelve or even three years or less today. The liberal establishment have much to answer for ,whether in believing that prisons should be five star hotels or that a fine that is never paid is the answer to the increased

MURDERS- GUN /KNIFE CRIME- BURGLARY- ROBBERY-THEFT-ASSAULT and whatever.

 

 

Our so-called Criminal Justice system would have been unable to treat prisoners as visitors and victims as criminals and there would have been Bobbies of the Beat- more prisons, and punishment to fit the crime.

Over the past 40 years the majority of your politicians in

YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS

 have been feathering their own nests to the point today in November 2007 there are many of them on a comfortable

£250,000 [at least] a year.

They fiddle their expenses-They lie about their expenditure-They lie about the true facts of the EU. In fact many of them lie about almost everything. They only work for a little over half a year .They have gold-plated pensions and they will be comfortable for the rest of their lives. As for what happens to their country as far as many of them are concerned our country had never existed.

Of course in such a bedlam there are a small group of men and women of

Honour and Integrity

who alas are ignored by their colleagues -some say they even detest them. Guilty secrets no doubt.

 

As for Europe the lies could not have been hidden if there had been eurosceptic parties at Westminster.  And the CONSPIRACY that has taken place since 1972 would not have been in place and our NATIONHOOD and COUNTRY threatened with extinction as will be the case in your Parliament in the early months of 2008.

*

THE ENEMY WITHIN IS YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT WHICH INTENDS TO SELL YOUR COUNTRY TO FOREIGN POWERS.

November-2007.

*

H.F.1594

 *  *  *

 

STEPHEN GLOVER: Has the gulf between rulers and the ruled ever been more starkly shown than in the passport fiasco?

To those of us who believe that the new British passport should be printed in this country, there is a common rebuke delivered by Remainers and Brexiteers alike.

Don't you believe in free trade? Isn't preferring the more expensive bid of a British company to that of a European one an example of protectionism and insularity?

Surely — these critics go on — insisting that the new blue passports be manufactured even at a slightly greater cost in the United Kingdom runs counter to all the spirited talk about post-Brexit Global Britain.

I disagree. And I very much hope the Government will reconsider its choice of the Franco-Dutch company Gemalto in the light of a Mail-inspired petition with well over 300,000 signatures, being delivered to No 10 today.

Symbolism

Indeed, I am certain these doughty people speak for millions. 

A YouGov poll found that 49 per cent of respondents believe the blue passports should be produced by a UK company even if an overseas firm offered better prices or services. Some 29 per cent disagreed.

Will Theresa May and Home Secretary Amber Rudd listen? The answer to that question depends on the degree to which they have grasped that this, above all, is a matter of symbolism which towers above financial considerations.

As it happens, nearly all these considerations collapse under examination. I'll come to these later. 

But first let me explain why I think that where the passports are printed is of such totemic importance.

More than any other document in our lives, the blue passport represents the revival of British sovereignty and independence sparked by the referendum on June 23, 2016.

 

I very much hope the Government will reconsider its choice of the Franco-Dutch company Gemalto in the light of a Mail-inspired petition with well over 300,000 signatures, being delivered to No 10 today, writes Stephen Glover 

Some Remainers scoff, of course. They say sovereignty and independence are illusions in an interconnected world except for huge continental powers like the United States or China. 

The blue passport means nothing to such people. In fact, many would rather keep their burgundy one.

But for most of those who voted Brexit, the blue passport is the very essence of what was taken away from us and has now been restored.

That is why it must be truly British. The new passport should be what it purports to be — a document signifying that the 'bearer' (to use the term included in the document's preamble) is a citizen of an independent nation.

And this will categorically not be the case if a Franco-Dutch company manufactures it in its low-cost Polish plant, or even in a factory in the UK. For one thing, Gemalto is expected soon be a quarter owned by the French state.

What happens if its workers should strike, or if the firm in some other way should fail to fulfil all aspects of its contract with the British Government?

Well, the Government would be powerless in the short-term to do anything at all. 

The symbol of regained independence would turn out, in practice, to be subject to the vagaries of a foreign conglomerate beyond its control.

By contrast, the British-based company De La Rue — which makes our current EU passport, and was underbid by Gemalto for the blue one — has never missed a delivery in the decade of its current contract.

Nor has De La Rue's loyal (and predominantly Brexit-supporting) workforce in Gateshead in the North-East, where current passports are made, lost a single day to industrial action.

Meanwhile, it transpires that Gemalto's record of reliability is far from flawless. 

 

A YouGov poll found that 49 per cent of respondents believe the blue passports should be produced by a UK company even if an overseas firm offered better prices or services. Some 29 per cent disagreed

It is embroiled in a national security row with the Estonian government after hundreds of thousands of state ID cards made by the firm were judged vulnerable to cyber-attack. 

The Estonian government (and others) are reportedly considering legal action against Gemalto, which has not had its contract renewed. From 2019, the cards will be produced elsewhere.

One might add that Gemalto's commercial viability is also not beyond question. It has posted four profit warnings in 18 months. 

Can anyone be 100 per cent certain that the company will deliver everything it is contracted to?

The point is a simple one. A new UK passport, standing as it does for our recovered independence, should be printed in conditions over which a sovereign British Government has as much control as is possible.

Of course we can't — and here we must grapple with the financial considerations I mentioned — ignore the matter of money. Gemalto underbid De La Rue by £120 million over an 11-year period to win the £490 million contract.

Furore

Set aside for a moment whether it can deliver at that price. Ignore possibly well-founded insinuations that Gemalto's bid was below cost price, and that the company is in receipt of covert loans or subsidies from the French government.

No, let us proceed as though that £120 million over ten years — £12 million a year — were real. Consider, then, the cost to the state of the mooted 200 job losses at De La Rue's Gateshead plant.

In an area of higher-than- average unemployment, many of these people would be thrown on the dole. 

 

Will Theresa May (pictured) and Home Secretary Amber Rudd listen? The answer to that question depends on the degree to which they have grasped that this, above all, is a matter of symbolism which towers above financial considerations

They would no longer pay income tax or National Insurance. Significantly poorer, they would buy less, and so pay less VAT. And they would be in receipt of all sorts of welfare benefits.

It's impossible to predict what the cost would be to the Inland Revenue in lost tax, or the extra burden to the Department for Work and Pensions in new benefits, but we can be sure there would be considerable inroads into the annual 'saving' of £12 million.

And then, of course, there is the human side of the equation. The North-East is one of the poorest regions of the UK. 

Many of its inhabitants feel forgotten and forsaken by successive governments — which partly explains why such large numbers there voted Leave.

Betrayal

Are the Tories really going to betray these dutiful people when there are already so many strong arguments concerning sovereignty and independence, not to mention reasonable doubts about Gemalto's ability to deliver? It would be a wrong-headed and careless thing to do.

Don't forget that France, Germany, Italy and Spain all insist that their passports are produced on home soil, citing security concerns. 

But the British Government dumbly plays by EU rules (even though we are leaving) and gives the contract to the lowest European bidder.

When this furore blew up two weeks ago, the Government in general, and Amber Rudd in particular, looked shell-shocked. 

The Home Secretary could not understand why her decision was deemed by so many as unpatriotic — as well as pretty bone-headed.

Seldom has the gulf between our rulers and the ruled been so dramatically illuminated. 

It's one thing to hop along reluctantly to the mood music of Brexit, as Miss Rudd generally does. It's quite another thing to understand its heart.

It's not too late. Labour wants the blue passports to be made in this country to protect jobs. Tory free-traders can surely be induced to accept that giving the contract to De La Rue is not an affront to the idea of global trade.

The Government must grasp that this is an issue about sovereignty and independence and looking after our own people. In truth, it's really about the future of Britain.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5579921/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Gulf-rulers-ruled-highlighted-Brexit-passport-fiasco.html#ixzz5BpSECWOz
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

APRIL 5,2018

 

H.F.1515

*  *  *

REMAINERS NEED TO REFLECT

ON A

STATEMENT

OF A

WORLDLY-WISE BUSINESSMAN

Sir Rocco Forte

CONFIRMS

REMAINERS MINDS REMAIN

CLOSED

TO

REALITY!

*

SIR ROCCO FORTE thunders... why the prophets of doom have got it so wrong...

 

* * *

[This must be one of the most instructive and powerful deliveries on the true purpose of the EU in it's march to an ever - closer union and to a bureaucratic empire'

In the words of the TRUTH-SEEKER and PATRIOT Christopher Story

the

EU

IS THE ENEMY OF NATION STATES.]

THE+EUROPEAN+UNION+COLLECTIVE-ENEMY+OF+ITS+MEMBER+STATES+BY+CHRISTOPHER+STORY

*  *  *

JULY 6,2018

H.F.1601/1

 

Theresa May should abandon

Brexit trade deal talks

 if Brussels remains stubborn, say top Leave campaigners including Lord Lawson

  • Theresa May has been encouraged to walk away if EU won't discuss a trade deal 
  • Leading Leavers including former Tory Chancellor Lord Lawson made the calls
  • They say delaying trade talks is causing ‘a highly damaging level of uncertainty’  

Brexiteers including former Tory Chancellor Lord Lawson  (pictured) urged Mrs May to abandon the negotiations if there is no progress towards a deal

Theresa May should walk away from Brexit talks tomorrow if EU leaders refuse to discuss trade with Britain, leading Leave campaigners say today.

Brexiteers including former Tory Chancellor Lord Lawson urged Mrs May to abandon the negotiations if there is no progress towards a deal.

In a letter released today they say the EU’s deliberate policy of delaying trade talks is causing ‘a highly damaging level of uncertainty’ for British business.

As such, the Prime Minister must issue an ultimatum at this week’s meeting of the European Council, which begins today.

If talks do not move on to trade, Mrs May should announce that Britain will move to World Trade Organisation (WTO) terms after March 30, 2019, and begin intense preparations for the ‘no deal’ Brexit.

The letter, organised by the Leave Means Leave pressure group, is signed by senior figures from politics, business, law and the military.

As well as Lord Lawson, who chaired the official Leave campaign, signatories include former Tory cabinet ministers Peter Lilley, John Redwood and Owen Paterson, Labour MPs Kate Hoey and Graham Stringer, economist Professor Patrick Minford, and JD Wetherspoon chairman Tim Martin. 

It came as former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith called on Mrs May to make preparations for leaving without a deal.

It came as former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith called on Mrs May to make preparations for leaving without a deal

He urged her to order Government departments to ‘make all arrangements’ for moving to WTO terms.

In an article for the Brexit Central news website, Mr Duncan Smith said the EU was dragging its feet to try and extract as much money as it can out of the UK. 

And in a clear swipe at Chancellor Philip Hammond, he said Britain’s planning for a ‘no deal’ scenario must include spending money.

The letter to Mrs May, published as she travels to Brussels, says: ‘Following your ...speech in Florence, it has become increasingly clear that the European Commission is deliberately deferring discussions on the UK’s future trading relationship with the EU27 post-Brexit. 

This is causing a highly damaging level of uncertainty for businesses.

‘The EU is taking this approach because they do not believe that the UK would be prepared to go to WTO rules for our trading relationship with them.

The letter, organised by the Leave Means Leave pressure group, is signed by senior figures from politics, business, law and the military

‘If at the European Council this week, the EU continues to refuse to discuss the future framework for a trade relationship, we should formally declare that we are assuming that we will be subject to WTO rules from March 30, 2019.’

Such an announcement would provide business with ‘absolute certainty about the future’ – and if the EU then wanted to return to the negotiating table, that would be a ‘bonus’. 

The letter adds that the public would welcome ‘such decisive action’ and ministers would be better focusing their efforts on ‘minimising disruptions’ from Brexit and seizing the economic opportunities.

 
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4994864/Theresa-urged-abandon-Brexit-trade-deal-talks.html#ixzz4w8OVhIJj
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

OCTOBER 19-2017

*  *  *

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1353 [BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU FOR GERMANY TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE AND TO ENTRAP ENGLAND TO PAY ITS MAJOR SHARE FOR THE

SATANIC BEAST'

VERY SURVIVAL, AS REVENGE FOR ENGLAND...WINNING TWO WORLD WARS AGAINST THE HUN!

H.F.1353

 
 
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BRITAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

BROUGHT BACK FROM 2006

[IN 2018 OUR COUNTRY APPEARS TO BE BACK IN THE DARK AGES WITH LAW AND ORDER IN CHAOS-MUCH MORE VIOLENT CRIME-FEW IF ANY BOBBIES -ON-THE-BEAT (EXCEPT IN DURHAM-LUCKY POPULATION)-MORE PRISONS REQUIRED AND TOUGHER SENTENCES. 12 BILLION IN OVERSEAS AID MUCH OF IT WASTED ON DANCERS AND DICTATORS... THE GOVERNMENT IS EVASIVE AND AS WITH BREXIT THEY IGNORE THE POPULATION WITH DECEIT AND MENDACITY. WHERE HAVE CONSERVATIVE VALUES GONE?]

*  *  *

JOHN REID HIT BY FIRST RISE IN CRIME FOR 11 YEARS

-WITH VIRTUALLY NO BOBBIES-ON-THE-BEAT- NO SURPRISE!

*

REID hit by first rise in CRIME for 11- YEARS.

BY

Matthew Hickley

Daily Mail-Home Affairs Correspondent-Dec., 9, 2006

JOHN REID suffered a fresh blow yesterday after it emerged that levels of crime have risen since he took over as Home Secretary this year.

According to the British Crime Survey, the number of offences went up between March and June, the first such increase since 1995.

Ministers have always insisted the BCS is the most accurate measure of CRIME.

The news came out in a Home Office performance report that also showed targets to cut reoffending and hard-drug abuse were missed.

The reversal of an 11-year fall in CRIME on his WATCH will embarrass Mr Reid, who has portrayed himself as a tough Home Secretary.

He still holds ambitions of taking on Gordon brown to become party leader and Premier.

[Well to have any chance at all he needs to use the £30,000,000 which was earmarked for prison building and still not spent and put Bobbies -on-the -Beat back on their plod in every community in the once almost law-abiding and safe and pleasant land]

 

Mugging, low-level violence and drug possession are up [NO SURPRISE!] after MINISTERS eased the LAW on DRINKING and CANNABIS and axed a ROBBERY crackdown.

The Home Office Report describes the rise in CRIME as a 'slippage' [Not a 'Gap' in this instance] in the flagship target to cut offending by 15 per cent from 2002 to 2007.

[Criminals across the world are converging on our Capital City and throughout our land as they realize what a lot of looney politically correct  police chiefs- politicians and their ardent helpers have made our country the ideal place to make loads of money and if -which is most likely they may have a chance of a jackpot of £50,000 because life was so marvelous in the nick that they decide to stay put rather than accept their black plastic bag at the door to freedom.  With what we hear the facilities in many prison would put many hotels to shame]

In the twelve months to March this year, the BCS showed

10,912,000

- offences were committed against adults in England and Wales [And these figures do NOT include the great number of crimes which are not recorded because the public has given up trying to get any response from their overburdened  paper-chase police who are confined to their safe blockhouses.  ]

While the increase is small, the Government can no longer claim that crime is falling. In recent years the BCS -based on household surveys in England and Wales -showed crime falling even while police logged more offences. [Well it is easy to see why-because so many people have come to accept the futility of giving information about crime levels when they see that the statistics later show that the state of the war on the streets that they see is totally different to the message they are palmed off with that things aren't half so bad -Want a bet many would say?]

Ministers said the BCS results were the best measure of trends, claiming police figures were distorted by new counting rules [OH! Yeah!]  But with the BCS showing a two per cent year-on-year rise in over-all crime, the Home Office stressed police recorded crime fell by a similar amount and called the BCS rise by a similar amount and called the BCS rise .not statistically significant' [Well those suffering from crime would have something to say about that.]

 

The Home Office report lists targets that have been hit, such as reduced fear of crime among the public and more offenders brought to justice [What JUSTICE! from what most people see it is a TRAVESTY of JUSTICE they see when they see so many criminals escaping from REAL PUNISHMENT whether MURDERERS or THIEVES. The increase in CRIME is because the criminal can see what a soft option it is if they are -most unlikely to be nicked in the act -with the traditional Bobbie -on-the -Beat nowhere to be seen]

It also boasts that the number  of 'unfounded asylum claims' in Britain has dropped from a peak of 70,000 in 2002 to around 40,000 this year.

BUT the number being removed fell by 30 per cent and the backlog of deportations is growing. [We understand from reports that it will take 27 years in order to clear the backlog and the time scale is growing each month New Labour stays in power]

The Home Office is missing its target of cutting reoffending among young criminals by five per cent over five years, with more than 41 per cent still being caught again within one year.

There has been no significant fall in targets to cut Class-A drug use among young people in eight years [Now isn't that a coincidence considering that New Labour has been the main culprit in giving the wrong message on DRUGS and so much more with their looney schemes of understanding such as are held by the Inspector of Prisons who believes there are too many young people in prison. The problem we have today is that the young have figured out the so-called system to suit themselves. The Home Office possibly doesn't know it but it is the CRIMINALS who are in CHARGE not the HOME OFFICE.]

The proportion of under -25s using HARD DRUGS still at 8.4 per cent.

 

Class-A drug abuse among vulnerable youths rose from 14.1 per cent in 2003 to 14.3 per cent.

 

ROBBERIES rose by five per cent in the year on June,  after police abandoned a street crime initiative when Home Office funding ended. [The £5 billion cost of the illegal Iraq War -no doubt.]

A 16 per cent rise in drug offences reflected an increase in cannabis possession after the law was relaxed [They were told it would happen -just as they have been told of the dangers of excess of GAMBLING-DRINKING-DRUG USE but there is no EXCESS PUNISHMENT for MURDERERS or VIOLENT CRIME and the street monsters who now rule the streets throughout the country because there is NO -Bobbie-on-the-Beat -released from paperwork and PC garbage and the return of powers to put the troublemaker in stir and the fast building programme to house the thousands of Hardened offenders out of the 200,000 on parole who should Be- Out-Of -Sight and Out-Of -Mind -DON'T YOU AGREE?]

Low-level violence was up 14 per cent year on year, which critics link to 24-hour drinking.

 

Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said:

'Despite the tough talk from this Home Secretary, the Government has failed to meet targets for reducing CRIME, DRUG USE by YOUNG PEOPLE and RE-OFFENDING. This amounts to a SERIOUS FAILURE.

[In every cloud there is a silver lining or in the words of a  Elizabethan poet ...'O'er lawyers' fingers, who straight dream in fees...' To our second greatest poet we have the following lines which fit a man now in imperseverant mood who's departure is near at hand...

"Horror and doubt distract

His troubled thoughts, and from the bottom stir

The Hell within him; for within him Hell

He brings, and round about him, nor from Hell

One step, no more than from himself, can fly

By change of place, Now conscience wakes despair

That slumbered; awake the bitter memory

Of what he was, what is, and what must be."

BUT

[We are not either very pleased with the cuddly approach of his 'Out-of this -World' leader who has only in the last few days after a year in the job to acknowledge that the

FAMILY is the BEDROCK

of a stable law-abiding society.

After a year on trial we have to say that he has fulfilled what we expected from him

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

He goes into his second year with a possibility that he is heading in the right direction and we don't mean the ice packs or sky diving over the hole in the ozone layer but down on EARTH and build on a fellow colleagues example-But please no apologizing for ANYTHING because up to now you have done NOTHING that even resembles a SERIOUS THOUGHT but there are now hopes that the Iceman is beginning to melt to show - dare we say it -a prospective PRIME MINISTER in the making. But is early days yet because he is still the SILENT MAN when the matter of the EU is raised and unless he takes into his confidence his deepest thoughts on the most important subject which has faced the country  in its long history many more will desert him and his party.

 

HAVE YOU ALL NOTICED THAT THE MEDIA  AND THE PRESS APPEAR UNWILLING TO RAISE THE SUBJECT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF ENGLAND COMPOSED OF THE REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

SURELY

IF THE EUROPEAN UNION IS SUCH A GOOD IDEA WHY  WONT THE POLITICIANS APPEAR IN PUBLIC AND DISCUSS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE OF A NATION STATE

-ITS FREEDOM AND LIBERTY?]

AND

ITS  ETHICAL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION

 

History tells us that it is to those nations in which the religious instinct is most implanted that their supremacy of the world belongs, and that because the struggle for existence is most strenuous. So in ethics the moral qualities descend from parents to children as distinctly as physical ones. A father and mother live wholesome lives, who do not allow their minds to be debased by ignoble thoughts and bequeath to their children minds of fine moral fibre which will bias their character towards the GOOD rather than to EVIL. By the coming together of similar minded individuals who will hand down their ethical strengths to future generations of healthy minds and bodies.

On the other hand  if parents give a loose rein to passion - if they poison their blood with the madness of blood, if they are flabby in moral principle and are given to lying and cheating these characteristics WILL descend upon their children. As is said the sins of the fathers shall be visited upon the children unto the third and fourth generation

Of course many spend their lives endeavoring to achieve these aims but the reality is that the absence of any interest at all in even contemplating the difficult but only true journey of life will result in the total breakdown of society and the eventual demise of a people who more than most has it in its power to regain its treasured links with the past and prove itself a force for GOOD

Many will say we live in a secular STATE and that there is no place for such matters but what have they to put in its place but the 'anything goes dogma' whatever its destructive character on society as a whole. Of course the individual has the freedom of his actions but unless the majority maintain the corrective course which in our usually cool though warming climate our people were renowned for their greater energy, greater keenness, industry, and all the qualities of the heart and head which came from a stern, strong nerved hardy race.

The drift over the past decades but even more so over the  past ten years to an abandonment of past values for the greater temporary excitement of release from all restraint has according to a recent poll left our people the most unhappy people among a host of nation states and a growing appetite for any new innovation which has cost the bodily health  and mind of many of our children and adults alike.

There has been much talk over the past few days of Victorian values and it is not too late to take in train the lessons to be learnt or find our future in the hands of those who have their own culture and values which if not matched by our own inherited truth will fill the void thus created and a different future will be ahead for our children and their children's children'

 

*

[The greater part of the above message is from the work of an author of the Victorian age and the early years of the 20th century -Sir Phillip Gibbs ]

 

*          *          *

[  Font altered -Bolding &Underlining used- Comments in brackets]

DECEMBER/06

*

 

H.F.1591

 

REWRITING HISTORY-BRUSSELS-STYLE

Monument to hubris: The lavish facade of the £47 million House of European History in Brussels

DAILY MAIL=REWRITING HISTORY-BRUSSELS STYLE by ROBERT HARDMAN

... play a pretty peripheral part in Europe's

rewriting of the European story here in the

 

heart of Brussels

Why does EU's new museum ignore Britain?

Saturday, October 14, 2017

 

 

 

ROBERT HARDMAN: Why does the EU's new £47m European history museum (part funded by UK taxes) ignore Britain's great achievements and gloss over Germany's wartime past?

Try as I might, I cannot find any reference to Shakespeare here. I imagine that many Europeans who don’t even speak a word of English would probably put him in the top ten of European cultural giants, but our greatest playwright hasn’t made the grade.

Still, at least there is a bit of Lego on display.

Similarly, you might expect the inventors of the railway, the jet engine, television, football, rugby and penicillin — British achievements, but European ones, too — to get some credit in a museum of European history.

Not so. Perhaps I am being thick, but after five hours, I am still looking. Never mind. There is an exhibit explaining that a Norwegian invented the paperclip and another telling how Hungary’s Josef Biro invented the ballpoint pen.

You do not have to be a flag-waving patriot to wonder how they managed to come up with some of this rubbish.

Now Britain has voted to leave the EU, perhaps we should not be so surprised to find that we play a pretty peripheral part in Europe’s rewriting of the European story here in the heart of Brussels.

One nation, however, is furious about the way the past is being portrayed in the European Parliament’s newly-opened ‘House of European History’.

This week, Poland’s culture minister made a complaint to the president of the European Parliament. He said the museum glosses over Germany’s wartime past while disgracefully pointing an accusing finger at Poland for being ‘complicit in the Holocaust’. ‘This exhibition violates fundamental historical truth in matters of fundamental importance,’ said Piotr Glinski.

A grave charge, particularly as the museum has been the pet project of a German ex-president of the European Parliament. It is certainly not hard to see German fingerprints all over a monstrously expensive and shamelessly self-serving exercise in revisionist propaganda.

Indeed, if this museum is indicative of the way the rest of Europe sees Britain and itself, no one can be remotely surprised that the UK has decided to go its own way.

Britain does get credited with importing the pyjama from Asia and with being the first European nation to abolish the slave trade. There is also a ‘Vote Leave’ T-shirt in a display case alongside a roll of ‘Vote In’ stickers, and a brief explanation that UK voters ‘no longer believed in the promise of prosperity and security within the European Union’.

But Britain’s role in freeing Europe from tyranny in the last century is brushed aside. There are several photos of bomb damage during the Blitz, along with other destruction all over mainland Europe. But key moments such as Dunkirk and D-Day — surely a central part of the European story — are barely mentioned.

I did find one reference to D-Day, but none to the Battle of Britain. No mention, either, of our Commonwealth allies, who shed so much blood across this continent. Sorry, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the rest. If you are acknowledged in here somewhere, I couldn’t find you.

Winston Churchill pops up, unnamed, in a photo of the 1945 Yalta summit as he sits alongside U.S. president Franklin D. Roosevelt and Russia’s Joseph Stalin as they decide the post-war shape of Europe. There is also a Union flag with those of the U.S. and U.S.S.R.

But the central narrative is that Europe entered the 20th century as a largely innocent collection of nation states, many of them recent and artificial creations.

After World War I — a catastrophe in which, apparently, all were equally to blame —these poor Europeans found themselves caught between two terrifying ideologies which were not their fault: Nazism and Stalinism.

Europe was then flattened and endured appalling suffering — thanks to the ‘Nazis’ and ‘Soviets’, rather than ‘Germany’ and ‘Russia’.

Europe was not liberated, as history has taught us. In the words of the museum audio guide, it was ‘disempowered’ and ‘divided’ between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.

It is only thanks to the emergence of the EU that peace and prosperity have occurred and endured. That’s the 20th century in an EU nutshell.

The Poles are furious because the suffering of Germany is equated with their own misfortune.

Photos of German refugees sit alongside those of Polish refugees. One display highlights the words of the Polish communist leader, Wladyslaw Gomulka, in 1945: ‘We must expel them (the Germans).’

Yet there is a more important question. Why has nearly £50 million of taxpayers’ money — much of it British — been spent on a vanity project with one clear over-arching message: that the EU is superior to the nation state?

It was ten years ago that Germany¿s Hans-Gert Pottering came up with the idea of a museum to show ¿how Europe¿s history shapes us all¿

It was ten years ago that Germany’s Hans-Gert Pottering came up with the idea of a museum to show ‘how Europe’s history shapes us all’

It was ten years ago that Germany’s Hans-Gert Pottering came up with the idea of a museum to show ‘how Europe’s history shapes us all’.

No matter that the European Parliament has another multi-million-euro museum around the corner which has been doing just that for several years (and which, incidentally, claims without a shred of evidence that our Queen is ‘explicitly pro-European’).

Of course, Europe can never have too many exhibitions telling Europeans how lucky they are to live in the EU super-state.

As for the British, if we have grounds for a complaint — and right now, our Government ministers have more to occupy them in Brussels than the contents of a new museum — it is lack of recognition rather than malice or misrepresentation.

We are shown as bit-players on the fringes. No doubt sour-faced Remainers such as Nick Clegg and Lord Mandelson would argue that is all that we deserve after our historic vote to push off.

But Britons will, no doubt, be liable for a share of the running costs for years to come as part of our Brexit divorce bill. So for now, at least, this is ‘our’ museum, rather than ‘their’ museum — not that it feels like it one bit.

Across six floors of exhibition space, the subject of World War II — the driving, defining episode in the modern European story — occupies just half of one level. Three floors are devoted to the rise and rise of the EU.

Churchill may barely feature but we are treated to a bust of that towering statesman, Joseph Bech, former prime minister of Luxembourg alongside a jug he received from his country’s wine industry in 1953.

In pride of place, of course, is a bust of the post-war German chancellor, Konrad Adenauer — a member of the same party as the Eurocrat who commissioned this absurdity.

The House of European History opened earlier in the summer (several years behind schedule). It is beautifully designed with all the latest in audiovisual gizmos and lots of eager staff.


 

genuinely recommend it to anyone with a few hours to kill in Brussels (entry is free — after all, you’ve paid for it already). Because once you have had a good look round, it will be abundantly clear why Britain has always found it so difficult to belong here.

I have seldom seen such a lavish exhibition of what is ostensibly ‘our’ story and yet felt so detached from it. Whether you are an ardent Remainer or unrepentant Leaver, I suspect you will reach the same conclusion.

Last night, a spokesman for the museum insisted it ‘does not aim to replace national representations of history’, adding: ‘It is a new, European concept which adds a European perspective to the national ones in existing museums.’

The content, she said, had been decided by a panel of historians and ‘the European Parliament has not and will not intervene politically’.

But at its heart, this is an EU project which promulgates the sense of Europe as a victim, of people as invertebrates at the mercy of extraneous forces. It’s a completely different attitude to the mindset which prevails in Britain. We are taught that we are where we are because of our decisions and our actions.

I go round with the Eurosceptic Tory MEP, Dan Hannan, who is also exploring the new museum for the first time. In his view, it captures the EU mindset perfectly: ‘It reflects a phrase I hear all the time in Brussels, that “a nation is an imagined community”. In Britain, we don’t think like that.’

We start on the ground floor where an exhibition called ‘Encounters’ explores Europe as a ‘transcultural space’. It begins with a celebration of trade.

‘Trading,’ it says, ‘can reduce the likelihood of armed conflicts. Trade develops well in times of peace’. Try telling that to the EU’s truculent negotiator Michel Barnier who is so reluctant to discuss future deals with a post-Brexit Britain.

Then we go up a level to ‘Europe: A Global Power’. We move from the French Revolution through to the 19th century to industrialisation.

It was then that so many European mini-states merged into nations — Germany and Italy among them — and it’s clear that EU chiefs do not regard this as a good thing. ‘Flags, anthems and symbols were used by national movements to enhance their self-image,’ sniffs the audio guide.

There’s a short section on colonialism, in which evolutionist Charles Darwin (a Brit, of course) is blamed for generating racist ideas about white supremacy, alongside the rise of the bourgeoisie and the introduction of trams.

And then it’s off to war.

World War I was a ‘catastrophe’ in which every nation behaved appallingly with its use of propaganda and industrial weapons. No sooner is it over than we reach ‘Totalitarianism Versus Democracy’. Down one side of a hall is the story of the failed democracies of the inter-war years. Down the other are inter-linked displays on ‘National Socialism’ and ‘Stalinism’ — ‘so alike in their brutality and oppression’.

Hitler’s success, we’re told, was based on ‘charisma and core loyalty’, rather than the fact that millions of ordinary Germans put him into power.

And that it is the undercurrent which runs through the section on World War II itself — ideologies are to blame, not Europeans.

There is very little on the actual fighting, beyond some grainy video footage of air-raids. Instead, it focuses on civilian suffering.

There is no attempt to play down the horror of the Holocaust, which is covered in detail, though the concentration camps were simply the work of ‘Nazis’ (as opposed to any nationality) and there is an adjacent display on the cruelty of ‘Soviet’ (never ‘Russian’) gulags.

There are also some peculiar omissions. Where is Vichy France? The fact that half that country willingly participated with Nazi Germany may be a very sensitive point in France, but it is surely relevant to the story of Europe.

I ask a member of staff where the Vichy section has gone. She points out a helmet from the ‘Milice’, the Vichy paramilitary, included in a small display on collaborators. This focuses more on the Norwegian collaborationist regime of Vidkun Quisling. And why not? Norway’s not in the EU. Better to avoid offending the French, who are.


 

here’s a short section on colonialism, in which evolutionist Charles Darwin (a Brit, of course) is blamed for generating racist ideas about white supremacy, alongside the rise of the bourgeoisie and the introduction of trams.

And then it’s off to war.

World War I was a ‘catastrophe’ in which every nation behaved appallingly with its use of propaganda and industrial weapons. No sooner is it over than we reach ‘Totalitarianism Versus Democracy’. Down one side of a hall is the story of the failed democracies of the inter-war years. Down the other are inter-linked displays on ‘National Socialism’ and ‘Stalinism’ — ‘so alike in their brutality and oppression’.

Hitler’s success, we’re told, was based on ‘charisma and core loyalty’, rather than the fact that millions of ordinary Germans put him into power.

And that it is the undercurrent which runs through the section on World War II itself — ideologies are to blame, not Europeans.

There is very little on the actual fighting, beyond some grainy video footage of air-raids. Instead, it focuses on civilian suffering.

There is no attempt to play down the horror of the Holocaust, which is covered in detail, though the concentration camps were simply the work of ‘Nazis’ (as opposed to any nationality) and there is an adjacent display on the cruelty of ‘Soviet’ (never ‘Russian’) gulags.

There are also some peculiar omissions. Where is Vichy France? The fact that half that country willingly participated with Nazi Germany may be a very sensitive point in France, but it is surely relevant to the story of Europe.

I ask a member of staff where the Vichy section has gone. She points out a helmet from the ‘Milice’, the Vichy paramilitary, included in a small display on collaborators. This focuses more on the Norwegian collaborationist regime of Vidkun Quisling. And why not? Norway’s not in the EU. Better to avoid offending the French, who are.

There¿s a short section on colonialism, in which evolutionist Charles Darwin (a Brit, of course) is blamed for generating racist ideas about white supremacy, alongside the rise of the bourgeoisie and the introduction of trams
 

There’s a short section on colonialism, in which evolutionist Charles Darwin (a Brit, of course) is blamed for generating racist ideas about white supremacy, alongside the rise of the bourgeoisie and the introduction of trams

After some harrowing images of refugees — German, Polish, Dutch and a British evacuee — the war is over. There is no sense of relief, let alone gratitude to the liberating powers of America and Britain.

‘The Allied leadership believed forced expulsions were the only way to ensure a peaceful continent,’ says the guide, pointing to the post-war carve-up of borders.

It is only when we reach a display in honour of ‘European Architects’ that the tempo changes. Hallelujah! At last, the EU is born and salvation is nigh.

Hidden away in a corner, I find the section which has upset the Poles so much. It is a display on post-war memory loss, highlighting the way in which different countries — though not Germany — chose to overlook any complicity in the Holocaust.

The section on Poland explains that, back in Soviet Bloc days, the concentration camps at places such as Auschwitz-Birkenau were portrayed as memorials to Polish, rather than Jewish, suffering.

‘Under Soviet control it focused solely on communist resistance,’ says the commentary, adding that it was 60 years before a ‘heated debate’ took place on the country’s role in the Holocaust. While many Poles risked their lives to protect the country’s 3.4 million Jews, others did nothing.

Here, too, I finally find a brief reference to France’s ‘treacherous Vichy regime’. After the war was over, says the commentary, France preferred to blame ‘a select few’ for collaboration in order to protect ‘French self-esteem’.

The tour continues at length through all the great benefits of European integration — travel, leisure, food, education and so on.

Towards the end, two exhibits take pride of place. One is the Nobel Peace Prize the EU received in 2012 for its contribution to ‘the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe’.

The other is an 80,000-page book documenting the rules and regulations introduced by the EU. It must be 20ft long and looks more like the bone of some gargantuan prehistoric creature. Perhaps future generations will view it as such.

To some, no doubt, it is a thing of wonder. But if anything in this temple of self-congratulation sums up what went wrong with the great EU dream, surely this is it. 

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4979466/ROBERT-HARDMAN-does-EU-s-new-museum-ignore-Britain.html#ixzz4vUh7lkJr
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

[And for the history of Germany by a close observer of Dr Ardenour after World War II go HERE!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1341 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S EU PLAN TO DOMINATE EUROPE AND ENGLAND IN THE PEACE.

 
 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DAILY EXPRESS

LEO McKINSTRY

 

 

[A GROSS FAILURE OF DIRECTION  OVER DECADES BY A SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY.]

*

News for DAILY EXPRESS-TORIES ARE PARALYSED... TOO INEPT TO DEAL WITH CRIME AND DEBT...

 by

LEO McKINSTRY

Daily Express columnist

DECEMBER 3,2018

Brexit should and start an invigorating new chapter in our island story be a golden opportunity for our nation to regain

INDEPENDENCE

and start an invigorating new chapter in our island story.

But in the hands of the enfeebled Tory government the process

of

WITHDRAWAL

 from the EU has been turned into the

GREATEST POLITICAL CRISIS

 since the

SECOND WORLD WAR .

Rather than embracing the

SPIRIT

of the

2016 VOTE

Westminster is gripped by

TURMOIL.

Amid the high-profile resignations, backbench revolts and fevered leadership speculation, the every very act of

DEPARTURE

is now threatened by the prospect of Parliamentary stalemate or a second referendum.

At the heart of this mess is a chronic failure of imagination and courage by the political establishment. Unable to contemplate life for Britain outside the EU, Theresa May and the ruling elite have produced a zombie Brexit proposal that could

LEAVE US IN A TWILIGHT ZONE OF INDEFINITE BRUSSELS CONTROL.

The DEAL is so unpopular that the Government is resorting to a desperate reprise of

PRODUCT FEAR

in their attempt to push it through the

COMMONS.

Yet institutionalised cowardice applies far more widely than just BREXIT.

What Ministers now suffer from

 is a collective lose of nerve

Paralysed by their own caution and ineptitude they seem to have abandoned faith in

CONSERVATIVE VALUES

preferring surrender

to the

PROGRESSIVE ORTHODOXY

The result is an accelerating breakdown in

CREDIBILITY  AND RESOLVE.

That pattern can be found in every field of governance. The Tories used to be the party of

LAW AND ORDER

but today they preside over a society where

CRIME IS SPIRALLING OUT OF CONTROL.

while the police are emasculated.

Official statistics show that 120 knife attacks are recorded every single day with the total of such offences surging to

21,602

in the first six months of 2018.

Similarly over the last year, overall violent crime went up by 19 per cent and robberies 23 per cent.

Yet in the face of this lawlessness police numbers continue to dwindle. Even when thugs are apprehended they are treated with dangerous leniency. A recent survey found that just a third of violent offenders are given custodial sentences.

When she first became Prime Minister Theresa May famously spoke of her determination to confront "burning injustices" But perhaps the greatest injustice of all is the acceptance by the state of appalling levels of criminality.

In the same vein, the Conservatives once had a reputation for strong defence, yet recent years have seen a dramatic decline in the strength of

OUR ARMED FORCES.

As disturbingly the spending priorities have been grossly warped by vain globalist ambitions. So over £6billion is squandered on two gigantic aircraft carriers, which consume much of the Royal Navy's resources in their own protection, though there are just two Border Force patrol boats to guard the entire English Channel...

More morally disgraceful is the Government's collusion with the current judicial witch-  hunts against military veterans who served in Ulster and Iraq. Such heroes, whose only crime was to do their duty, should be protected, not exposed to opportunistic legal vultures and compensation seekers.

In the past the Tories claimed to be the party of fiscal responsibility , yet now Mrs May eagerly declares that "austerity is over" , despite the

FACT

THAT OUR NATIONAL DEBT IS OVER

£1.7 TRILLION.

A PERFECT symbol of this profligacy is the £56billion HS2 rail project, which is a shambles that the current chairman Sir Terry Morgan, who has only been in the job four months, openly admitted at the weekend that he is likely to lose his job.  There are far better uses for

PUBLIC FUNDS

in transport than this monstrous vanity project'

 

The same politically motivated extravagance an be seen in the

FOREIGN AID PROJECT

which has just passed the

£14BILLION

-a year mark, more than the Government spends on the

POLICE.

Much of this colossal sum is,

WASTED

not only through

CORRUPTION AND MISMANAGEMENT that

but also by the encouragement of welfare dependency.

With epic self-delusion, Tory chieftains believe that such largesse shows they are no longer the "nasty party", to quote Mrs May's notorious phrase, but in reality, this gigantic exercise in subsidized virtue-signalling illustrates

THEIR CONTEMPT

FOR THE

PUBLIC PURSE

Nor would a genuinely self-confident Conservative government allow mass immigration on its current destructive scale.

The latest official figures show that

625,000

migrants settled here in the last year putting an intolerable strain on our civic infrastructure. Supporters of open borders like to extol the economic contribution made by new arrivals, but according to the Office  for National Statistics only

33 PER CENT

of them, little more than a third, were actually seeking work.

It is the same everywhere. The social revolution started by Tony Blair's  Labour  continues under May's Conservatives. So a nominally Tory  government imposes endless bureaucratic equality audits , obsesses about diversity, blathers about the fictional "gender pay gap" fuels the triumph of the aggressive transgender ideology and allows the erosion of

FREE SPEECH

ACROSS OUR PUBLIC LIFE.

None of this will help the Conservatives retain power. Due to their incompetence over

BREXIT

there could be a general election soon, but they will not win in aping  the Labour Party.

The rediscovery of the traditional Tory ideals of pragmatism, competence and patriotism offer a  far surer route to

VICTORY.

 

[BUT NOT WITH EU ENTHUSIAST THERESA MAY AT THE HELM-HER CREDIBILITY HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED WITHOUT REPAIR.]

 

 

* * *

 THIS MOST TIMELY AND ENLIGHTENING AND INFORMATIVE ARTICLE GIVES A CLEAR PICTURE OF PAST AND PRESENT SITUATION . AS OBSERVERS OF THE POLITICAL SCENE FOR DECADES WE HAVE SEEN THIS GATHERING MOMENTUM AS THE YEARS PASSED. ONCE A NATION LOSES ITS CONNECTION WITH ITS PAST THEN THE FUTURE WILL FALL INTO CHAOS AND CONFUSION.

 

 

News for DAILY EXPRESS-TORIES ARE PARALISED... TOO INEPT TO DEAL WITH CRIME AND DEBT by LEO McKINSTRY

Tories are paralysed, too inept to deal with crime and debt, says LEO MCKINSTRY

DECEMBER 3,2018

[ COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1757

 

 [A CAUSE WORTH FIGHTING FOR

THE RETURN OF THE FREE NATION STATE

OF

ENGLAND

-instead of remaining within a threatening-toxic totalitarian so-called European Union- a monstrous- cunning - controlling - captive - calamitous

soon to be

SUPER-STATE.

*

BUT

TO REGAIN

OUR RIGHTFULL INHERITANCE.]

"WE must never cease to proclaim in fearless tones the great principles of freedom and the rights of man which are the joint inheritance of the English-speaking world and which through Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, the Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, and the English Common Law find their most famous expression in the American Declaration of independence..."

 

Part
of an almost 1000 word speech by Winston Churchill at Fulton Missouri,USA in March,1946,

*  *  *
THE END OF THE ENGLISH

By

David Brown

 

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

 HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

 WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

*

[THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID

NOTHING!]

2008

 

 

292

Remember constantly that it was Hitler's intention to unite Europe. (Just as it had been the ambitions of Charlemagne, Charles V, Louis XIV, Napoleon and the Kaiser.)

Remember it was Adolf Hitler who first used the phrase

'The United States of Europe.

Remember  that it was Hitler who had the idea of establishing regions of Europe in order to

DESTROY NATIONAL IDENTITIES.

 

He wanted to break European nations  into regions so that they could be ruled from

BERLIN.

 

MORE!

LINKS to A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/CON30/B404/B308

(www.vernoncoleman.com)

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!}

DECEMBER  5,2018

H.F.1760

 

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2018-

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

DECEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

-2019