- (1994 -Official Website - JAN-PT2 -2019 )--

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019          JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019         JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 5-2019         

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 6-2019          JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-PAGE 2-2019

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY

*

A SMOKESCREEN

OF

EPIC PROPORTIONS

HAS DESCENDED

ON OUR COUNTRY

GAT A MOST CRUCIAL MOMENT

IN

ENGLAND'S HISTORY.

 

With only a matter of weeks until hopefully we leave Hitler's planned so-called European Union we are after 75 years asked to contribute to the long delayed MEMORIAL to our brave troops who stormed Normandy in June 1944 to set Europe FREE.

What we ask is why at the most important time in the history of ENGLAND  to reclaim our FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE that this most deserving issue has only now after seven decades suddenly appeared?  It is too much of a coincidence with the Daily Mail now holding forth the Hiterian REMAIN BANNER which it adopted a matter of month's ago.

Our first instinct was to send a contribution but then it occurrred that we were playing into the hands of those who wish us to remain trapped within the BEAST in BRUSSELS.

With England one of the five richest countries in the world we are at a loss as to why the contribution should not be funded  from the Natiobnal Exchequer which holds the People's PUBLIC PURSE.

Obviouslly if members of the public wish to contribute they can do so.

It is the timing of this appeal which the spirits of those who gave their lives for their country and its unique democracy that makes the timing so disrespectful to their great sacrifice for HOME and COUNTRY.

  ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY  
Transcript of Chairman of the EDP talking on BBC Midlands Today, on 6th June 1999 (55th Anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy), in the run up to the European Elections.
 55 YEARS AGO TODAY
ENGLISHMEN AND OTHERS
WHO LOVE FREEDOM

LEFT THESE SHORES
TO SET EUROPE FREE

TODAY I ASK FOR
ENGLAND TO BE SET FREE

OVER THE PAST 1500 YEARS
THE ENGLISH PEOPLE
HAVE BEEN INFUSED
WITH THE BLOOD OF MANY NATIONS
WHICH HAS STRENGTHENED
AND VITALIZED THEM
AS THE NATURAL
DEFENDERS OF FREEDOM

"ONE COULD SAY
MANUFACTURED IN ENGLAND
WITH RAW MATERIAL
FROM THE WORLD
"

FOR ME
ENGLAND

IS THE HALF-WAY HOUSE
OF FREEDOM
TO THE PEOPLES OF THE WORLD
SPACER WITH HER HISTORIC FREEDOM
OF INDEPENDENT ACTION
IN THE FIELD OF WORLD AFFAIRS
A FREE NATION STATE
WITHIN A FAMILY
OF INDEPENDENT NATION STATES
OF A GREATER BRITAIN

FOR ME
ENGLAND IS THE LAND OF THE ENGLISH
THE LAND OF ENGLAND
IS THE SPIRIT
OF THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND
A SACRED LAND
BEQUEATHED IN BLOOD
FROM THE PAST
AND HELD IN TRUST
FOR THE FUTURE

[TIME OF 13 SECONDS RAN OUT]

[GOD SAVE OUR QUEEN]

'Countries make wars

not

Peoples.'

FEBRUARY 2, 2019

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-

ENGLAND FILE

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

DID YOU KNOW?

No 2

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

The Treaty of Rome was never actually signed by the six founding 'Member States' of the European Community, and could therefore be technically invalid, or even invalid in fact.

Dr Hallstein was one of the 'signatories', with Dr Adenauer, of the Treaty of Rome establishing the European Communities, 'signed' on 25th March 1957.

A young Italian Chancery aide called Giulio Andreotti ( later Italy's Prime Minister, subsequently embroiled in scandal like his fellow former Italian Prime Minister, the President of the European Commission, Romano Prodi) had contrived to procure the signatures  of the Plenipotentiaries on

blank sheets of paper

 because the German, Dutch and Italian translations of the French original were not yet available, and the delegates had to leave for their respective capitals. .  .

The official text of the Treaty of Rome states, at the end: 'In witness whereof, the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed this Treaty: Done at Rome this twenty-fifth day of March in the year of one thousand nine hundred and fifty- seven:

 

P. H. SPAAK (the Belgian Communist-Ed.) ADENAUER, PINEAU , ANTONIO SEGNI.BECH, J.LUNS, J. CH SNOY ET D'OPPUERS, HALLSTEIN, M . FAURE, GAETANO MARTINO, LAMBERT SCHAUS, J.LINTHORST HOMAN'.

*

[More background information will be available in the near future or for your copy contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

AUGUST-2008

 

H.F.196

BULLETINS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Supreme Court Justice, World Bank President, and another Rothschild fall as revolution continues

Now that top-level satanic Khazarian cabalists have fallen, second-rank officials like Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, World Bank chief Jim Yong Kim, and Serena Rothschild (widow of Jacob Rothschild) are being removed as the war to liberate humanity continues.

Ginsburg “has gone missing and may be dead or still in NY hospital, missing two weeks of oral arguments at the Supreme Court, or the entire month of January, with no proof of life, setting the stage for U.S. President Donald Trump to name another Justice,” Pentagon sources say.

Jim Yong Kim, a Clinton appointee, was forced to resign as President of the World Bank because of corruption, say Dragon family sources.  Investigators are focusing in particular on Haiti and Kim’s involvement with Clinton corruption related to the artificially induced 2010 Haiti earthquake, CIA sources say.

Serena Rothschild was the widow (or wife) of senior Zionist elder Baron Jacob Rothschild and mother of Nathaniel Rothschild.  All we know is that she died “after a short illness.”  We have reported that Jacob Rothschild is already dead, but it appears that attempts are being made to make it seem he is still alive in order to prevent his progressive-minded son Nathaniel from taking over the British branch of this still-powerful family.

In any case, with U.S. military tribunals well under way, many more prominent power brokers and financiers will be removed in the coming days and weeks, Pentagon sources say.  Among those due to fall soon are IMF head Christine Lagarde, and senior KKR financiers …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Goldfish Report on January 11, 2019: Interview with Red and White Dragons

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCq8_HKbad8&feature=youtu.be

On The GoldFish Report No. 323, Louisa hosts a special Dragon Interview with the Red Dragon Ambassador and the spokesperson for the White Dragon Society, Benjamin Fulford.

Joining her to co-host is YouTuber Tim Emslie in Australia. This report focuses on the world financial system and the geopolitical and financial changes that are presently occurring.

Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid next cabalist to be executed as military tribunals begin

The Bundy Ranch villain and traitor, former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, is going to join John McCain and George Bush Sr. and be executed for treason, Pentagon sources say.  Like McCain, Reid will officially die of cancer and be allowed, as condemned men are, the right to a few last words, the sources say.  Reid chose to badmouth U.S. President Donald Trump.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/2/1823124/-Terminally-Ill-Harry-Reid-Minces-No-Words-About-Himself-Nor-Donald-Trump?detail=emaildkre

While senior public figures like Reid are being allowed to die “naturally,” others will be executed by lethal injection, Pentagon sources say.  The sources also confirm that military tribunals have already begun and that military justice is swift.

Meanwhile, the shutdown of the U.S. government, now entering its third week, is likely to lead to the declaration of martial law, the sources say.  The unfolding scenario will see military intervention after unpaid prison guards and airport security walk off the job, while food stamp recipients start hunger riots.  The U.S. military is fully funded for the next year, so there is no need to worry about a mutiny by unpaid soldiers, by the way.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hard-digest-inmates-eat-holiday-steak-during-shutdown-while-prison-n954971

https://www.pennlive.com/news/2019/01/airport-security-screeners-calling-in-sick-amid-the-government-shutdown.html

https://www.wtrf.com/news/funding-for-food-stamps-program-running-out-as-shutdown-lingers-on/1688602045

“The Roman Curia is supposed to rule over their creations—trusts, foundations, C Corps, S Corps, LLCs, and so on.  Now, to their credit, the Curia has weighed in and liquidated a great many municipal corporations involved in criminal activities.  This includes the UNITED STATES, INC., which has been subjected to Chapter 7, Involuntary Bankruptcy.  They are now in the process of ‘vacating’ the premises and have to shut down and leave D.C. for 90 days,” was what Judge Anna Von Reitz had to report on the situation.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/01/the-kingdom-of-dead.html

Like a dream come true for many, we are also now seeing moves to abolish the Internal Revenue Service and fold the Federal Reserve Board into the U.S. Treasury Department, the sources say.  Among other things, this means income taxes will be abolished and replaced with a sales tax on non-essential items, they say.  Some independent confirmation of this can be found here:
https://prepareforchange.net/2019/01/06/h-r-24-and-h-r-25-bills-submitted-to-us-116th-congress-2019-2020-call-for-a-full-audit-of-the-fed-system-abolishing-the-irs-by-repealing-all-taxes/

The U.S. military is also preparing for financial systems negotiations with China by sending troops to Africa and Brazil in order to seize key resources and thus bargaining chips (coltan for mobile devices, soybeans, etc.), the sources say.

With these chips in hand, Trump will be meeting Chinese Vice Premier and financial expert Wang Qishan at Davos on January 22nd.  Here, the Global Currency Reset will be …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Content in Prepare for Change, 12/27/18

Greetings and warm wishes, Mr. Fulford,

First and foremost, thank you for all you have done and continue to do to inform the public.

I do not work for anyone or anything—I am only inquiring on matters of personal interest, as you hit on a subject I have been trying to understand for nearly 6 years.

Namely, that you had mentioned about the prophet of Islam Muhammad possibly having been involved with the Vatican.  I too have found very obscure references to such or similar as being true, one of which is that Muhammad was a Catholic Cardinal whose real name was Lothar Schmalfuss.

Please understand it is my most highest wish to see humanity recover from the idolatrous institutions of Christianity and Islam which utilize central male figures to ‘dictate’ on authority of so-called God.  Unfortunately, I only see Islam picking up steam, as I reside in Ontario, Canada and we are seeing a political party forming which intends to implement Sharia-based law.  In my own research, I have found the Qur’an to be, rather than divinely inspired, a product of many adaptations from Syro-Aramaic liturgical texts and strophic hymns.  This ‘book’ the Qur’an has absolutely wreaked havoc on the multitudes, and your mention of Muhammad’s having been tied to the Vatican gave me a small glimmer of hope.

Do you have any other information as to what might be happening regarding Islam?  It no doubt has played a crucial crucial role in the Middle Eastern crisis which, as we know, has lasted thousands of years.  It is my wish that the ‘truth’ about Christianity and Islam is exposed to the public and these old institutions disseminated and work daily to these ends.

Much regard,
—JF


The reference I had to Muhammad being trained by the Catholics originally came from the Catholic Encyclopedia.  I also was told this by the P2 Freemasons.  My understanding was that he was to disseminate a version of monotheism that was suited to the region, but then the whole project went rogue.

Did you know the Koran does not mention Mecca or the need to worship a rock there?

The actual teachings of Muhammad, as opposed to all the stuff that was added on after his death, are quite moderate and something that would fit comfortably in a Western context.

Anyway, I am not an expert on Islam or religion, but rather try to stay focused on the world as it is and how to make it better.

—BF

 
 
2019-01-14

 

H.F.1760

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid next cabalist to be executed as military tribunals begin

The Bundy Ranch villain and traitor, former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, is going to join John McCain and George Bush Sr. and be executed for treason, Pentagon sources say.  Like McCain, Reid will officially die of cancer and be allowed, as condemned men are, the right to a few last words, the sources say.  Reid chose to badmouth U.S. President Donald Trump.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/2/1823124/-Terminally-Ill-Harry-Reid-Minces-No-Words-About-Himself-Nor-Donald-Trump?detail=emaildkre

While senior public figures like Reid are being allowed to die “naturally,” others will be executed by lethal injection, Pentagon sources say.  The sources also confirm that military tribunals have already begun and that military justice is swift.

Meanwhile, the shutdown of the U.S. government, now entering its third week, is likely to lead to the declaration of martial law, the sources say.  The unfolding scenario will see military intervention after unpaid prison guards and airport security walk off the job, while food stamp recipients start hunger riots.  The U.S. military is fully funded for the next year, so there is no need to worry about a mutiny by unpaid soldiers, by the way.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hard-digest-inmates-eat-holiday-steak-during-shutdown-while-prison-n954971

https://www.pennlive.com/news/2019/01/airport-security-screeners-calling-in-sick-amid-the-government-shutdown.html

https://www.wtrf.com/news/funding-for-food-stamps-program-running-out-as-shutdown-lingers-on/1688602045

“The Roman Curia is supposed to rule over their creations—trusts, foundations, C Corps, S Corps, LLCs, and so on.  Now, to their credit, the Curia has weighed in and liquidated a great many municipal corporations involved in criminal activities.  This includes the UNITED STATES, INC., which has been subjected to Chapter 7, Involuntary Bankruptcy.  They are now in the process of ‘vacating’ the premises and have to shut down and leave D.C. for 90 days,” was what Judge Anna Von Reitz had to report on the situation.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/01/the-kingdom-of-dead.html

Like a dream come true for many, we are also now seeing moves to abolish the Internal Revenue Service and fold the Federal Reserve Board into the U.S. Treasury Department, the sources say.  Among other things, this means income taxes will be abolished and replaced with a sales tax on non-essential items, they say.  Some independent confirmation of this can be found here:
https://prepareforchange.net/2019/01/06/h-r-24-and-h-r-25-bills-submitted-to-us-116th-congress-2019-2020-call-for-a-full-audit-of-the-fed-system-abolishing-the-irs-by-repealing-all-taxes/

The U.S. military is also preparing for financial systems negotiations with China by sending troops to Africa and Brazil in order to seize key resources and thus bargaining chips (coltan for mobile devices, soybeans, etc.), the sources say.

With these chips in hand, Trump will be meeting Chinese Vice Premier and financial expert Wang Qishan at Davos on January 22nd.  Here, the Global Currency Reset will be …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Content in Prepare for Change, 12/27/18

Greetings and warm wishes, Mr. Fulford,

First and foremost, thank you for all you have done and continue to do to inform the public.

I do not work for anyone or anything—I am only inquiring on matters of personal interest, as you hit on a subject I have been trying to understand for nearly 6 years.

Namely, that you had mentioned about the prophet of Islam Muhammad possibly having been involved with the Vatican.  I too have found very obscure references to such or similar as being true, one of which is that Muhammad was a Catholic Cardinal whose real name was Lothar Schmalfuss.

Please understand it is my most highest wish to see humanity recover from the idolatrous institutions of Christianity and Islam which utilize central male figures to ‘dictate’ on authority of so-called God.  Unfortunately, I only see Islam picking up steam, as I reside in Ontario, Canada and we are seeing a political party forming which intends to implement Sharia-based law.  In my own research, I have found the Qur’an to be, rather than divinely inspired, a product of many adaptations from Syro-Aramaic liturgical texts and strophic hymns.  This ‘book’ the Qur’an has absolutely wreaked havoc on the multitudes, and your mention of Muhammad’s having been tied to the Vatican gave me a small glimmer of hope.

Do you have any other information as to what might be happening regarding Islam?  It no doubt has played a crucial crucial role in the Middle Eastern crisis which, as we know, has lasted thousands of years.  It is my wish that the ‘truth’ about Christianity and Islam is exposed to the public and these old institutions disseminated and work daily to these ends.

Much regard,
—JF


The reference I had to Muhammad being trained by the Catholics originally came from the Catholic Encyclopedia.  I also was told this by the P2 Freemasons.  My understanding was that he was to disseminate a version of monotheism that was suited to the region, but then the whole project went rogue.

Did you know the Koran does not mention Mecca or the need to worship a rock there?

The actual teachings of Muhammad, as opposed to all the stuff that was added on after his death, are quite moderate and something that would fit comfortably in a Western context.

Anyway, I am not an expert on Islam or religion, but rather try to stay focused on the world as it is and how to make it better.

—BF

If we all push, 2019 will see final victory against the Khazarian mafia

Many signs indicate that 2019 will be a breakthrough year in the battle against the satan-worshiping Khazarian mafia.  Not only have mass arrests begun, but the mass-murdering part of the pharmacidical/medical establishment is finally being taken out as well.  Another obvious sign it is no longer business as usual comes from the fact that the U.S. military is being withdrawn from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.  And this time the U.S. government shutdown may actually result in formal bankruptcy procedures against the illegal corporate government that has occupied Washington, D.C. since 1871.

Let’s start with the U.S. military withdrawals, since they mark one of the biggest changes seen since the end of World War II when the perpetual war economy of the U.S. military-industrial complex began.  Pentagon sources say U.S. President Donald Trump’s Christmas Day visit to Iraq portends a pull-out from that country.  This follows withdrawal announcements from Afghanistan and Syria, as well as a ceasefire in Yemen.  We also note that almost all of the U.S. carrier groups are now at rest in their home ports.

Even more dramatically, the sources say, “Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan’s mission will be [to bring out in public view the] space force, bring troops home, release extraterrestrial and suppressed technology, close overseas bases, beat swords into plowshares and cut waste, while building a more lethal military.”  This means peace on earth and goodwill to all in a very real sense this holiday season.

The Pentagon sources also say the long U.S. government shutdown “makes it easy to arrest Deep-Staters embedded in the government.”  Furthermore, the first senior official to be publicly tried in “Nuremburg 2.0 will be ….
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Western civilization heading for a reboot over the holidays

Many signs and confirmations from highly placed sources indicate that a reboot of Western civilization is being planned for 2019.  The shutdown of the U.S. government over the holidays, for example, has nothing to do with building a wall, and everything to do with a financial reboot and upcoming military tribunals.

However, what is coming is about much more than just rounding up the criminals who hijacked and bankrupted the U.S. government—it is about fixing the problems besetting monotheism.

Since today is December 24th, Christmas Eve, it’s a good time to remind people of the historical truth behind this holiday.  The fact is that nobody knows when Jesus Christ was born, so the early Christian church hijacked the old solar New Year holiday and replaced the sun with Jesus.  Here’s the thing:  the sun sets at its most northern point on December 21st, the winter solstice.  For three days afterwards, it appears to set at the same place, and then on December 25th it starts setting further south, marking the birth of the solar New Year.  Thus, the Christian church needs to confess and tell people the truth about Christmas without in any way denying the wonderful teachings of Jesus Christ and Christianity.

The Jews, for their part, need to stop celebrating the xenophobic Hanukkah and realize that it is perfectly kosher to celebrate the solar New Year (unless they somehow think the Creator did not make the sun).  Anyway, Merry Christmas to the Christians and Muslims, and Merry Sunmas to everybody else.

These issues, together with discussions of updating the calendars to bring them back into line with the movements of the heavens on which they are based, are going to be part of a broad public discourse in the New Year.  That is because, at the highest levels of world power, a decision has been made to go ahead and rebuild the temple in Jerusalem and turn that city into an international free zone.  This is why 2019 is likely to be a year for the history books.

In preparation for these upcoming historical changes, U.S. troops are being withdrawn from various conflict zones in order to pave the way for world peace, CIA sources say.  Pentagon sources agree, adding that “U.S. President Donald Trump is pulling out of Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, and the Ukraine to terminate the Deep State and the Zionists, since the global currency reset requires peace and cessation of hostilities.”

European royal family sources concur that preparations are under way for a reboot of the global financial system.  The current U.S. dollar, Euro, and Japanese yen-based system is bankrupt and dysfunctional, these and other sources agree.  This is especially true of the United States, which has been bankrupt for quite some time now, the sources say.  That’s why this current U.S. government shutdown is going to lead to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
 

 

H.F.1776

 

 

*

 

 

[A REMINDER FROM OCTOBER-2006

 HOW THE

ONCE CONSERVATIVE PARTY

 HAS LOST ITS WAY.]

*

So Why Don’t We LEAVE The EU?

 

– No serious economist any longer maintains EU membership essential to trading with Europe.

 

*

 The TAX dilemma that’s put the Tories in a TWIST

 By

 Andrew Alexander  

 *

Daily Mail

Friday, October 20, 2006

  

THINGS have come to a pretty pass when a promise to cut personal taxes is seen as a dangerous vote loser. But that is what David Cameron believes.

 

Come to that, things have also come to a pretty pass when he argues that the issues of

 

CRIME

 

IMMIGRATION

 

EU

 

(and seeking to return some powers lost to Brussels are vote losers.  Indeed, his front-benchers are warned not to refer to the EU membership, even to regaining our fishing rights.)

 

Things have come to a pretty pass, you may say, when someone with such views should be leading the party at all.

 

However, he is now confronted with the Conservative tax reform Commission kicking over the traces and calling for Ł21 billion of tax cuts.

 

IT WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO DO THAT SORT OF THING.

 

When he set it up, it was supposed to suggest all sorts of fiddling little changes in the inter-family transferable allowance and the like.

 

This is the most significant piece of work on reforming and improving the tax system ever undertaken by an Opposition,’ snarls Cameron, trying his best to sound pleased.  And Shadow Chancellor George Osborne flounders as he tries also to look happy.

 

In fact the proposals are quite modest, as are the global sums involved. Show me the individual who, looking around at the bloated bureaucracies which surround us, does not believe that the Government can cut spending by just a few percentage points.

 

Before the report was ‘leaked’, Osborne did in fact commit himself to one proposition – to reduce Corporation Tax.

 

Some readers will take the unkind view that his real aim in this is to curry favour with big business, which includes so many contributors to Tory party funds.  Well, who am I to argue with my readers?

 Osborne’s ostensible cause is to help the competitiveness of British business. I am all for this proposal – As for the other cuts being urged on him –

But on wider grounds.  For if there is one tax which is widely misunderstood it is this.

 In reality, companies do not pay tax – NOT A PENNY.  They cannot do so any more than a paving stone or a piece of furniture can.  ONLY People pay TAX.  In this case they include shareholders, among whom will be senior employees.

 

BUT MORE OFTEN THE BURDEN IS SIMPLY BORN BY CUSTOMERS.

 

Corporate tax has become just another overhead.  Firms set prices allowing for an expected net return after tax, just as they do after allowing for other costs, such as advertising, fuel, auditors fees and all the rest.

 

Naturally any cut in overheads is welcome to business and consumers. However, there is a way to reduce overheads significantly – without the loss of a penny to the Exchequer or transferring any burden to the average taxpayer.

 

This is by cutting the massive cost of REGULATION – regularly promised by Chancellor Gordon Brown while he regularly does the opposite.

  

Corporation tax raises around Ł42 billion a year.  The total cost of regulation is impossible to quantify with great accuracy.  But it certainly approaches a comparable figure, probably exceeds it.

 

A considerable proportion of this arises from EU regulations. Our burden from this source alone is reckoned at about Ł20 billion a year.

 

But if we left the EUROPEAN UNION, we would save an even larger figure, from ending our direct contribution to Brussels and, much more, by allowing a cheaper food regime.

 

SO WHY DON’T WE LEAVE?

 

- especially with the EU burden increasing steadily?  No serious economist any longer maintains that EU membership is essential to trading with EUROPE.

 

A variety of international agreements have made

FREE TRADE

- The rule:  and we are the EU members’ biggest export market anyway.

 

BUT POLITICIANS, whether the issue is IRAQ or the EU, cannot bring themselves TO ADMIT ERROR.

  

On top of that, so many of them are very nervous of upsetting what likes to call itself ‘informed opinion’. meaning that strain of opinion which runs from the (otherwise admirable) Guardian newspaper through Hampstead and round to the BBC via the FOREIGN Office.

  

Politicians can shrug off accusations of mendacity, adultery, laziness and ill-faith. BUT they have a holy terror of being accused of zenophobia – which they would be, however unfairly, if they called for an

END to EU MEMBERSHIP-even if warmly supported by the ELECTORATE.

 

The TERROR is sadly on the TORY front bench.  You may talk about Brussels, BUT only in discussing a little –loved vegetable.

 

*   *    *

 

YOU TOO CAN HAVE A LEADER LIKE OURS

[MR BUSH]

 

It is a salutary thought that the Chief of the General Staff, General Sir Richard Dannatt, not elected by ANYBODY, says what most of the country THINKS while TONY BLAIR, elected by a massive majority-IGNORES IT.

 

What you need is democracy, we keep telling the IRAQIS, among others. Then you too could have an elected leader like BUSH (no comment needed) or BLAIR, who has resolutely defied popular opinion and the views of virtually all his MIDDLE EAST experts and thrown in a few porkies on the way.

 

Normally the OPPOSITION will stand up for an ignored PUBLIC. But it has not forced a single debate on IRAQ for THREE YEARS.

 

THE TORIES SEEM TO HAVE FORGOTTEN WHAT THEY ARE FOR?]

 

*

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets.] 

 *

Leaders of the Conservative Party

SINCE 1885

 

Marquis of Salisbury

1830-1903

 

(Service - 18 years)

  

A.J.Balfour

1848-1930

 

(Service – 9 years)

 

Bonar Law

1858-1923

 

(Service – 11 years)

 

Austen Chamberlain

1863-1937

 

(Service – 1.5 years)

 

Stanley Baldwin

1867-1937

 

(Service – 14 years)

 

Neville Chamberlain

1867-1940

 

(Service – 3 years)

 

Winston Churchill

1874 -1965

 

(Service -15years)

 

(“Leadership” refers here to leadership of the Conservative Party in the Commons or leadership of the party as a whole.)

 

[We have included the above list of leaders of the Conservative Party when it was still a party of Conservative Values and the stature of each one of those great men was an inspiration to our House of Commons and the Other House and an example of honourable integrity to the whole world.

 

Since the war years we can look back and apart from Winston Churchill  -Anthony Eden and Margaret Thatcher there has been no leader of the party that can be compared with those men who held such great responsibility in their hands at the time of EMPIRE.

 

To read of the honourable conduct and the great esteem with which each of those great men was held makes one proud to be an Englishman and a Briton and with many who have visited the hallowed buildings associated with such disinterested and selfless men who worked at their posts with the love of their country uppermost in their hearts. Such a loss of such a tradition of service to one’ country lies at the heart of the troubles we find ourselves in today in 2006.

 

The Conservative Party does not deserve to be returned to Government as it has forgotten what their predecessors stood for and it appears to have the return to Power as the most important issue before its eyes whereas it should FIRST return its party to traditional conservative values and accept that they will not return to Power until they can stand before their illustrious shadows in the House confess their wrongs and place before the People a  True Conservative manifesto which though they may lose the next election will place them on the road to future Power.]

 

In the meantime we remind the so-called leader of the Conservative Party of the  Maxwell Fyfe Committee’s Conservative Party Structure (1948 ) of the  ‘three phases in the evolution of the Party’s intentions’  

 

PRINCIPLES

 

POLICY

 

PROGRAMME

*

 [ Since 2006 and as observers of the political scene for over twenty years, we have seen the lack of the above. As the reader would have noticed over the years-December 2018]

The FIRST of these is not subject to change; “the Disraelian principles are as vital today (1949) as when they were first propounded”.

 

FIRST –To maintain the INSTITUTIONS of the country.

 

Second – to uphold the Empire [and in 2006 as King Henry the Eighth stated –England is an Empire.]

 

Third – To elevate the conditions of the PEOPLE.

 

Cited in Riley.E.S  Our Cause Exmouth 1948.

See also R.J.White –the Conservative Tradition, London 1950.

 

*

[We include a number of speeches to underline the importance of the Conservative Party to its core values in the aftermath of the Great War.]  

 

It was a time as indicated by Stanley Baldwin’s biographers…. That ‘there can be little doubt that he was deeply apprehensive about the extent to which corrupt practices (involving among other things, what amounted to be the sale of titles) were alleged to be spreading among the higher reaches of the party. One of those present in the Carlton Club meeting (who supported the Baldwin-Bonar Law line) has told the writer that he believes that if the Conservative Party had not freed itself from the Coalition, political corruption might have come to play as large at in its affairs as it has in the history of American’.

 

A speech by Sir George Younger in September 1922 following a decision taken at Chequers by the leadership to go to the country at the earliest opportunity under Lloyd George’s leadership.

Sir George then described his own reactions to this decision.

  “I have recently turned up the file which I have at the office to see what I had said when I got the news. My letter was a short one. ‘I am,’ appalled to hear this decision has been taken. It will break our party in twain if persisted in’. (Of) that I am satisfied and know now it would be done.”

 

Younger then described his own role in the events that followed:

 

“What was my duty?  I am Chairman of the [Conservative] Party Organisation…I tried to build every conceivable bridge – to get change in the policy these senior members had decided in our Party…from my knowledge of the constituencies which I get every morning…I know the constituencies were dead against this policy [Coalition in favour of the Party] I knew that if a special conference of our Party was called they would show to our Ministers that that was the view of the country.  I said to the leader:

‘If you find it absolutely necessary to have a General Election before the National Unionist Conference of 15th November [1922]

You will be tricking the Party out of their rights if you don’t have a special conference of these people, and give your reasons for this policy before you plunge into disaster.’

 

“So I made up my mind that if there was going to be a split it should be split from the top , and not from the bottom, and that the leaders who were responsible for pushing such a disastrous policy were the men to go, and not the tail.  We have to maintain the solidarity of the Party. I consider as nothing the result of an election in comparison with the vital necessity of maintaining our Party intact.  To lose an election is a temporary thing; to smash a Party is an appalling disaster. I would remind you that our great Party is the only great political party which stands between the constitution of this country and those who believe in subversive policies.  [Now do you understand Mr Nice Guy Dave in 2006]

 

It is no use Mr Chamberlain saying to you, as he said to his constituents, that he was all for the nation and the others were

All for the party. I say the interests of both are synonymous, and we stand for the nation as much as him.  I took care to see that the Party should not be wrecked.”

 

*

 

[Another example of change was that after Stanley Baldwin – ‘who had led his party in 1923 to resounding defeat and opened the gates to the formation of the first Socialist Government in the country.  Yet strangely enough, in the process Baldwin appears greatly to have increased his own stature as a national figure

and in addition, to have united his party. He gave an interesting retrospective justification for his action in 1923 in a speech to the Constitutional Club in January, 1925.’]

 

“In the autumn of 1923….our party then was not wholly united….What would have happened…if we had attempted to run our full term?...Having come to power as we did, and not being a wholly united party, we should have lacked that impetus, that popular will behind us….I am not at all sure….that there was not beginning a dry rot in our Party that might have led to disaster two years hence.

 

“What was the result of our fighting together (in the election of 1923)? The result was that, when we were beaten, we had exactly the shock that was wanted to pull us together, and that nothing else could be done, and the opportunity was taken to overhaul our Party and its mechanism from the top to the bottom, and to infuse and to instil into it a new life and new ideals [But not sell their country and its institutions to Europe as Ted Heath later did in 1972 and all Conservative Prime Ministers since leaving the way open for the Arch traitor Tony Blair to sign the United States of Europe before there being a referendum on the issue of the destruction of the English Constitution].

 [And in December,2018]

… as so often happens to those who have the courage to do what they think is right, the fates themselves took a hand in the game and they fought on our side from that moment.” (Cited in Steed, W., The Real Stanley Baldwin.)

 

Baldwin publicly acknowledged the uneasiness of his followers about his attitude to Labour:

 “  I know I have been critized widely, for being too gentle in my handling of the Labour  Party, but I have done it deliberately, because I believe it has been a good thing for this country that the Party, comprising as it does so many citizens of this country, should learn by experience what a great responsibility administering an Empire such as ours really is . (on the eve of the election of October, 1924)

 

Baldwin himself, after eleven years as Leader, attempted to put into words a description of the real relationship between the Conservative Leader and his followers. Speaking to the Conservative annual conference of 1934 he said:

 

“Disraeli laid our PRINCIPLES down at the Crystal Palace many years ago and you cannot go wrong if you stick to them.  They were: ‘the maintenance of our INSTITUTIONS and of OUR RELIGION; the preservation of our EMPIRE, and the IMPROVEMENT in the condition of the PEOPLE.’

 

It does not tell you how you are to adapt your policy in changed circumstances and changed ages. That is the duty of the leader. The responsibility – and it is a great responsibility –

That rests with a leader is to try and adapt the policy according to the deep-laid foundations of the Party principles to meet whatever may come in this world.

 

“Equally as it is the duty and the responsibility of the Leader to do that, it is right of the Party, if they think fit, to challenge its interpretation.  That is democratic.  If insufficient numbers they can challenge it so that it inevitably leads to the choice of a new leader, that is democratic, and that is the way we do things [in the Conservative Party].

 

And he added (it had been a conference which had insisted on its right to “tell him home truths”):

 “But I want to say that I am at present Leader of the Party and so long as I lead I am going to lead it.”

Baldwin’s statement recalls the concluding sentence of A. L. Lowell’s chapter on “Party Organization in Parliament” in his (The Government of England) He wrote:  “when appointed, the Leader leads and the party follows.”  But the statement requires amendment in the light of the fate of Conservative Leaders since Lowell wrote in 1908.

It should read…”when appointed, the Leader leads, and the party follows, except when the party decides not to follow; then the Leader ceases to be Leader.”

 [ As in December 2018]

DON’T YOU AGREE MR NICE GUY DAVE?

 

To Vote for

OUT OF THE EU

 

www.eurosceptic.org.uk/campaign

 

*

[For much of the above material we have the undermentioned publication as of great assistance]

 

British Political Parties –R.T. McKenzie

William Heinemann Ltd

99 Great Russell Street

(the Whitefriars Press Limited)

(Reprinted April 1955)

 

*          *          *

OCTOBER/06

 

H.F.1761

*
 [A CAUSE WORTH FIGHTING FOR

THE RETURN OF THE FREE NATION STATE

OF

 ENGLAND

-instead of remaining within a threatening-toxic totalitarian so-called European Union- a monstrous- cunning - controlling - captive - calamitous

soon to be

SUPER-STATE.

*

BUT

TO REGAIN

OUR RIGHTFULL INHERITANCE.]

"WE must never cease to proclaim in fearless tones the great principles of freedom and the rights of man which are the joint inheritance of the English-speaking world and which through Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, the Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, and the English Common Law find their most famous expression in the American Declaration of independence..."

 

Part
of an almost 1000 word speech by Winston Churchill at Fulton Missouri,USA in March,1946,

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!}

DECEMBER  5,2018

H.F.1760

*

 

Don't Give In

To

The E U

 

WHY A UK COMPROMISE WITH BRUSSELS WILL CONFINE THEIR CAPTIVE NATION STATES EVEN TIGHTER TO ENSURE THERE CAN BE NO MORE DEFECTORS. WHILE A FIRM RESPONSE FOR A JUST SETTLEMENT FROM THE UK WILL GIVE HEART AND ASSISTANCE TO THOSE FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOTS PRISONERS OF HITLER'S PLANNED EU TO BAND TOGETHER TO FIGHT FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

WE SAY NO! TO COMPROMISE.

It is forgotten that an individual country which makes a decision affecting itself or others has the opportunity to remedy the situation. Whereas, in the EU this is not possible, unless ALL or the permitted number agree to the change and knowing the belligerence of Hitler's brainchild this could have serious and dangerous consequences.

Remember, the responsibility of the UK to assist those captive people's who wish to be

FREE

because it was the blood of British troops in the past that assisted the birth of many of the

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES in EUROPE.

BY STANDING FIRM FOR AN ORDERLY AND JUST EXIT FROM HITLER'S EU WE WILL RECOVER THAT RESPECT THAT OUR BROTHER NATIONS WHO SAW BRITAIN IN 1973 NEGLECT THEIR KIN AROUND THE WORLD FOR AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE WITH A COUNTRY

GERMANY

WHICH IN

TWO WORLD WARS

WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS  AND INJURIES OF MILLIONS AND VAST DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY...FOR WHICH THE LIKE THE WORLD WOULD NOT HAVE  PREVIOUSLY SEEN.

A FREE INDEPENDENT EUROPEAN UNION OF FREE PEOPLE'S WITHIN THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

YES!

THE PRESENT UNDEMOCRATIC-BULLYING EU.

NO!

The fault of our present situation is because of TREASON within the Tory Government of

Edward Heath

 A Nazi spy since 1938 reported to MI5 in 1938 by the Master of Balliol College, Oxford.

 Who in the 70's  and with previous administrations secretly conspired to lead the British people blindfolded into the Nazi-planned EU . It is therefore incumbent on the present Tory Government of Mrs May to bring the situation back to what it was before January 1973. The evidence of Tory wrong-doing has been on our website since 2005.

*

Compromise.

Compromise is but the sacrifice of one right or good in the hope of retaining another,-too often ending in the loss of both,

- Tryon Edwards

*

From the beginning of our history the country has been afflicted with compromise. It is by compromise that human rights have been abandoned. I insist that this shall cease. The country needs repose after all its trials; it deserves repose. And repose can only be found in everlasting principles.-

Charles Sumner

*

A surrender to the Nazi-planned EU would not bring repose to the millions of patriots who wanted their country back. An unjust settlement instead of a Churchillian response will see the battle continue until victory is secured.

Victory

You ask, What is our aim?  I can answer in one word: Victory - victory at all costs, victory in spite of all the terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival.

- Winston Churchill.

FOR THE MILLIONS WHO HAVE DIED IN THE PAST FOR THEIR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND THEIR CAN BE NO SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED UNDEMOCRATIC CAPTIVE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

*  *  *

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

BY

DAVID BROWN

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

 HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

 WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

*

[THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID

NOTHING!]

 

*  *  *

 

 

292

Remember constantly that it was Hitler's intention to unite Europe. (Just as it had been the ambitions of Charlemagne, Charles V, Louis XIV, Napoleon and the Kaiser.)

Remember it was Adolf Hitler who first used the phrase

'The United States of Europe.

Remember  that it was Hitler who had the idea of establishing regions of Europe in order to

DESTROY NATIONAL IDENTITIES.

 

He wanted to break European nations  into regions so that they could be ruled from

BERLIN.

 

MORE!

LINKS to A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/CON30/B404/B308

(www.vernoncoleman.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

THIS COULD BE THE TIME FOR THOSE    MP'S in the SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY  OR OTHERS TO FORM THEIR OWN PATRIOTIC PARTY OF THE CENTRE. TO ATTRACT ALL VOTERS WHO LOVE  THEIR COUNTRY AND UNIQUE -PRIZED CONSTITUTION. WHO WANT IT BACK AS IT STOOD BEFORE JANUARY,1973.

Rees-Mogg-Borris Johnson... TO LEAD THE WAY!

THE EDP WOULD OFFER ITS NAME AND WITHDRAW FROM THE POLITICAL SCENE TO SUCH PATRIOTIC INDIVIDUALS AND AT THE LEAST WOULD SUPPORT SUCH A PARTY.

IN PARLIAMENT WE FIND THERE ARE LOBBY GROUPS SUCH AS FRIENDS OF WHO EVER BUT THERE ARE NO FRIENDS OF ENGLAND .IT IS ABOUT TIME THERE IS A PATRIOTIC BLOCK TO STAND UP FOR ENGLAND AND ITS PAST AND FUTURE. WE HAVE BEEN WAITING TOO LONG FOR A RETURN OF OUR ENGLISH PARLIAMENT - IS LONG OVERDUE.

LETS DO IT!

*  *  *

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

'Destroy [her] fib or sophestry. in vain

The creature's at [her] dirty work again.'

Pope

*

A CALL TO ARMS!

 

'Awake, arise, or be for ever fallen,'

JOHNJohn Milton

[before the Beast of Europe.]

*

The signs are that Mrs May's

PROMISE of BREXIT!

HAS INSTEAD AS MANY HAD ALREADY SUSPECTED YEARS AGO , AS A CONFIRMED REMAINER -SHE WOULD

BRUSSELS IT!

*

'Blest Isle, with matchless beauty crowned

And manly hearts to guard the fair:-

Rule Britannia! rule the waves!

Britons never will be slaves!'

J.THOMSON

[ With a Greater Remainer vote in Wales and Scotland the above verse is no more true,]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

NOVEMBER 14, 2018

*
 

 A DEMOCRACY OR A DICTATORSHIP?

 

[ON DECEMBER 11, 2018 -AFTER OVER TWO YEARS OF NEGOTIATIONS THE COMMONS WILL VOTE ON THE PRIME MINISTER'S' SO-CALLED BREXIT DEAL WHICH AS ALREADY SHOWN IS A SHAM TO PLEASE HER CLOSE FRIENDS IN THE EU. HER ORIGINAL COMMENT OUTSIDE NO10 THAT BREXIT MEANS BREXIT HAS BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE BEEN NOTHING OF THE SORT. SHE HAS SHOWN HERSELF TO BE A LIAR-PERJURER AND TRAITOR-IN THE IMAGE OF ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER PRIME MINISTER  EDWARD HEATH A NAZI SPY FOR 60 YEARS UNTIL HIS DEATH IN 2005. ALMOST THE SAME TACTICS WERE USED-TO KEEP EVERYTHING IN HER HANDS  WITH THE HELP OF TRUSTED CIVIL SERVANTS. FELLOW CONSERVATIVES HAVE. IT APPEARS SHE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN THE VIEWS OF HER CABINET, OR ANY OTHER MP UNLESS THEY MIRROR HER OWN. IF HER BREXIT MINISTERS SHOW PROGRESS SHE SHOWS THEM THE DOOR. SHE ACTS LIKE A SOUTH AMERICAN DICTATOR RATHER THAN A PRIME MINISTER IN THE HOME OF MAGNA CARTA, WE HEAR THAT THAT INDUCEMENTS HAVE BEEN OFFERED TO MPS TO ENSURE HER VOTE IS PASSED IN THE HOME OF ENGLISH DEMOCRACY WHICH SHE AND OTHERS HAVE DONE MUCH TO DESTROY. SURELY IF A CONNECTION IS FOUND OF AN MP CHANGING THEIR VOTE BECAUSE OF INDUCEMENTS OFFERED THAT INDIVIDUAL SHOULD BE SHOWN THE DOOR OF THE COMMONS.]

FRIDAY 28 NOVEMBER,2018

 

 

H.F.1676

 

*

 

 

 

UK HANDING Ł1.5 BILLION AID TO WORLD'S MOST CORRUPT COUNTRIES.

 

[WILL THEY NEVER LEARN?

 

TOO MUCH MONEY

AND

NO SENSE]

LIKE SO MANY PROBLEMS WE STILL HAVE AFTER DECADES

IT IS THE SAME INEPT MENTALITY THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INANE AND TRAITOROUS HANDLING OF BREXIT]

 

 

 

 

 

UK handing Ł1.5bn aid

to

world's most corrupt countries

By

 Jason Groves- Daily Mail-Political Editor

JANUARY 5,  2019

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

HOW WE GIVE AWAY MILLIONS

ON

FOREIGN AID

HOW OTHER NATIONS COMPARE

 

 

 COUNTRY                             2016                           2017

Syria                 Ł351.8                Ł313.8

 

Somalia            Ł151.7                  Ł282m

 

Afghanistan        Ł235.3                Ł226.9m

 

Yemen           Ł126.9                     Ł204.9m

 

South Sudan       Ł160.9                 Ł168.2m

 

DR Congo         Ł129.5                    Ł166.2 mŁ226.9m  

 

Iraq                 Ł118.9                    Ł82.8m

 

Sudan              Ł65m                       Ł63m

 

Libya              Ł14.4m                      Ł14.7

 

Cambodia      Ł2m                           Ł4m

THE ABOVE ADDED JANUARY,5,2019

*

FOREIGN AID CONTRIBUTION

 [We suggested a UK payment of 50% which would ensure that only deserving cases would be dealt with with no rush to spend the taxpayers hard-earned monies on inappropriate so-called charitable projects. THERE IS A DEARTH OF FINANCE NEEDED URGENTLY FOR OUR NHS-DEFENCE-LAW & ORDER-PRISONS [HOTELS!] AND  SO MANY OTHER NEEDS WHICH HAVE BEEN NEGLECTED UNDER THE GANG OF THREE OVER DECADES.  ]

SEPTEMBER-2018

Since the above date the UK contribution is now

14 BILLION

 

 

*  *  *

 
DAILY MAIL

FOREIGN AID

HOW OTHER NATIONS COMPARE

 

 

    AID SPENDING -------------------------------% GROSS NATIONAL INCOME--------------------------------

UK                 Ł13.9bn    ---         0.70%

 

GERMANY    Ł19.2bn                  0.66%

 

FRANCE        Ł8.8bn                    0.43%

 

ITALY           Ł4.5bn                     0.29%

 

CANADA       Ł3.3bn                    0.26%

 

JAPAN          Ł8.9                         0.23%

 

US                 Ł27.4                       0.18%

 

 

An average of 39%

 [We suggested a UK payment of 50% which would ensure that only deserving cases would be dealt with with no rush to spend the taxpayers hard-earned monies on inappropriate so-called charitable projects. THERE IS A DEARTH OF FINANCE NEEDED URGENTLY FOR OUR NHS-DEFENCE-LAW & ORDER-PRISONS [HOTELS!] AND  SO MANY OTHER NEEDS WHICH HAVE BEEN NEGLECTED UNDER THE GANG OF THREE OVER DECADES.  ]

SEPTEMBER-2018

Since the above date the UK contribution is now

14 BILLION

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JANUARY 5,  2019

 

H.F.1774

* 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 
[A FAILED PROMISE FROM APRIL 2017]

*

 

[PROCLAMATION CONFIRMED

FOR

 ENGLAND'S

 FREEDOM AND FUTURE.

 

COUNTDOWN TO SUCCESS

ON

JUNE 8-2017

WE REMIND REMOANERS-PARTICULARLY MPs THAT BREXIT IS ABOUT FREEDOM-CULTURE AND COUNTRY-AND PROSPERITY WITHIN A WIDER WORLD OF OPPORTUNITY

NOT ABOUT IF YOU COULD LOSE YOUR JOB OR BUSINESS OR EU HANDOUTS-

PAID FOR BY ENGLISH TAXPAYERS MAINLY IN THE SOUTH EAST OF ENGLAND.]

*

     

    Tory manifesto will guarantee end

     

     

    of

     

     

    free movement

     

     

    ++

     

     

     UK to leave Single Market

     

     

     ++

     

     

     No more

     

     

    meddling by Euro Judges

     

     

     

    by

     

     

     

    Jason Groves-Political Editor | Daily

     

     

    Mail Online

     

     

    THERESA'S CAST-IRON

    BREXIT

    PLEDGES

     

     

     

     

     

    THERESA MAY will place a triple lock on Brexit  in the Tory manifesto to STOP OBSTRUCTION

     

     

    by

     

     

    DIEHARD REMAINERS

     

    Tory sources say she is set to include specific pledges to overcome opposition within her party and in the Lords.

    The manifesto is expected to commit the Conservatives to ending

     

    EU FREE MOVEMENT

     

    and pulling out of both the

    SINGLE MARKET

    and

    EUROPEAN COURT of JUSTICE

    Senior Tories see these three measures as essential in delivering last year's referendum result

    [Mrs May's Pledge that

    BREXIT means BREXIT

     is MET!]

     

    Full article

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    April 20-2017

     

    IN DECEMBER 2018 WE SEE THAT  THERESA MAY'S

     

    PROMISES

     

    HAVE BEEN FOUND

     

     

    TO BE FALSE!

     

     

     

H.F.1169/1

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

Cameron exploited civil service over

Brexit

by John Stevens

Deputy Political Editor of the Daily Mail

Project Fear undermined TRUST in Whitehall, say MPs,

Full article

 

Charge sheet laid at

 REMAINERS DOOR

THE Ł9.3M LEAFLET.

*

'MISREPRESENTATIVE' TREASURY REPORTS.

*

IMPARTIALITY OF CIVIL SERVICE DAMAGED.

*

OFFICIALS SHOULD HAVE PREPARED FOR BREXIT.

*

CAMERON TRIED TO 'SHUT DOWN DEBATE' ON EU.

*

Full article

 

H.F.1168 BREXIT FREEDOM WILL SOON BE YOURS!-IF YOU FIGHT FOR IT!

 

DAILY MAIL

 

Greedy. Arrogant Amoral.

 So what a disgrace bankers

STILL

haven't been punished.

DAILY MAIL- By Alex Brummer - City Editor-

Greedy.Arrogant.Amoral.-So what a disgrace bankers STILL haven't BEEN PUNISHED.

APRIL 11,2017

To the accompaniment of the finest wines and a rack of lamb, Barclays chairman John McFarlane and chief executive Jes Staley entertained senior financial journalists at the swanky Morton’s club in London.

Amid this bonhomie ten days ago — which began with a jokey welcome speech and upbeat report from the Barclays bosses — there was no hint whatsoever that another major financial scandal involving the bank was about to be exposed.

But then, perhaps, that’s no surprise since arrogant insouciance has been the trademark attitude of the banking industry over recent years, alongside an appalling sense of entitlement.

But now we know Barclays was facing two very worrying problems. First, the chief executive was being investigated by financial regulators for the serious offence of trying to unmask a whistleblower who had raised issues about a senior executive

CRIMINAL

And then there was Barclays’ alleged complicity in the case, revealed yesterday, in which Bank of England and government officials have been accused of putting ‘serious pressure’ on Barclays staff to rig interest rates on the Libor (London Interbank Offered Rate) which crucially sets the cost of global borrowing.

Both these cases call into grave question the ethics behind the bank’s practices.

As a result, Barclays is being investigated by the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority over how Staley (hired from New York’s J.P. Morgan investment bank to restore Barclays’ reputation and prosperity) used his bank’s security team and federal officials in the U.S. to track down the whistleblower.

This drama follows a period of internal tension among Barclays executives that had been ratcheted up in the wake of the controversial recruitment by Staley of former colleagues from J.P. Morgan and Wall Street for the most lucrative jobs at the bank.

Now this dirty business has been made public, Barclays’ board says it will censure Staley and will impose a ‘significant cut’ to his bonus.

This could not have come at a worse time for Barclays and — more importantly — for public trust in Britain’s banking system, which has already been hugely damaged by a series of scandals.

Nearly a decade after the financial crisis erupted, the UK’s banks are still embroiled in a series of criminal, legal and regulatory cases which clearly suggest they still have a culture of dishonesty and incompetence.

Against this shabby background — with countless examples of unscrupulous behaviour (much of it undoubtedly illegal) — I find it astounding there have been so few criminal cases brought against those responsible.

 

Instead of chief executives or chairmen facing charges, it has been only minor figures who have been brought to account — such as a UBS trader found guilty of manipulating Libor rates.

No senior executive or board member has been brought before the courts on either side of the Atlantic.

And if this serial rule-breaking and attempted cover-ups of scandals were not damaging enough, we have witnessed the shameful way banks have encouraged Britain’s personal debt mountain to mushroom through lax lending policies on credit cards and loans.

This threatens to turn Britain’s current economic boom into bust.

Credit card debt has risen to its highest level in 11 years.

British families owe a total of Ł67.5 billion on credit cards — cynically enticed to run up huge debts through unsolicited increases in their spending limits and the use of so-called ‘teaser’ zero interest deals that specifically target poor families and encourage them to borrow more than they can afford.

Wherever you look, there seems to be a serious question mark over the integrity of the banking industry.

For example, there is deep disquiet over Lloyds, whose former and current senior management are under investigation over what they knew about fraudulent activity at their branch in Reading.

In February, six bankers were jailed for ripping off small business customers to the tune of Ł245 million.

Consistently, Lloyds bosses have claimed they were unaware of the criminal behaviour of its staff. But as well as devastating customers of the branch, the fraud is expected to cost Lloyds investors Ł250 million in likely compensation payments.

The truth is senior Lloyds executives knew of the scam as long ago as 2008 but were anxious, it has since been revealed, ‘not to disclose’ the cost to investors. They wanted to cover it up.

Also, Lloyds’ reluctance to pay compensation to victims of the Reading crime until forced to do so is a damning indictment of a bank whose chief executive, Antonio Horta Osorio, is struggling to recover his reputation after being exposed for having an extra-marital liaison with a woman while attending a conference.

FIXING

Meanwhile, at Britain’s largest bank, HSBC, its annual report revealed 37 separate legal cases over business lapses — ranging from money-laundering to charges of trying to win the favour of the Chinese authorities by hiring senior local officials’ children.

As for Barclays, there can be fewer charges that are more serious than the accusation of working with the Bank of England and the former Labour government to lower interest rates.

Thanks to BBC journalists, we now have evidence that Barclays, claiming it was acting on the authority of the Bank of England, deliberately set about fixing the Libor interest rate during the peak of the financial crisis.

Barclays is also mired in a whole series of other major legal cases.

The Serious Fraud Office is deep into a long investigation into whether the bank paid unlawful commissions to Middle East investors from Qatar when it raised almost Ł12 billion of new capital during the credit crunch in 2008.

On another front, Barclays’ boss Staley is fighting the U.S. Justice Department, which wants to levy a multi-billion fine on the bank over its handling of securities based on so-called sub- prime mortgages.

Ruthless

These are the vast quantities of loans made by banks to U.S. homeowners who could never pay them back — a scandal that was at the root of the world financial crisis.

As for Staley’s deeply embarrassing formal reprimand and bonus-cut after breaking rules over the whistleblower, the board argues that its chief executive was simply acting in the best interest of the bank.

However, I find it extraordinary that a banker of Staley’s experience and seniority felt it was acceptable to intervene in such a case, particularly considering that whistleblowing is officially recognised as one of the most important means by which banks are able to protect their values and the trust of the public.

After the humiliation of bank collapses and subsequent bail-outs by taxpayers, the British people had hoped that our financial institutions had learned their lesson.

A new regulatory regime was put in place designed to end the greed, arrogance, amorality and shoddy business methods that precipitated the worst financial crisis for 80 years and which has cost every man, woman and child in this country an estimated Ł20,000.

But, sadly, the latest series of scandals shows how little has really changed and how ruthless bankers are still holding the British economy and financial stability to ransom.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4400044/ALEX-BRUMMER-Bankers-haven-t-punished.html#ixzz4e2gjf7Xz
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

[We have stated many times over the past decade that

'Small is beautiful'

Whether it is in personal needs-small population-smaller quantity of legislation -law etc... and by chance  a few days ago we came across again the  above everyday proverb by

E. F. Schumacher, 1973.

'Schumacher's thesis is that mankind  is being distorted by the worship of economic growth and needs to adjust its thinking to survive. The phrase is now used in a wider context as an axiom that sheer size of a corporation, building .etc) is not in itself automatically a good thing.'

Those who are intoxicated by GREED for WEALTH whether in the BANKS or in PUBLIC SERVICE and elsewhere increase the cost of living of the common man-the TAXPAYER! and puts the monetary stability of the country in great danger. As with personal DEBT so with PUBLIC DEBT accountability is the order of the day and unless this happens the lives of many will become worth living. The GOVERNMENT should ensure that they show the way by reducing the QUANGOS and exorbitant salaries on the PUBLIC PURSE.

It is AS another proverb explains

'To FEATHER one's (own) nest'

To look after one's own interests, especially by accumulating financial assets, the implication being that GREED, SELFISHNESS, or DISHONESTY is INVOLVED.'

 and we have seen examples from some of those who left the political scene after the

BREXIT VICTORY!

*

APRIL 11,2017

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1167 BREXIT FREEDOM IS YOURS - IF YOU FIGHT FOR IT!

 

 

 DAILY MAIL

 COMMENT

-REPEAL Bill

and the

REAL ENEMIES WITHIN

 

YESTERDAY'S unveiling of the Great Repeal Bill marks another crucial milestone on Britain’s historic journey to becoming an independent sovereign nation once more.

Just 24 hours after Theresa May served formal notice of our intention to quit the EU, here was the blueprint for restoring the supremacy of Parliament and ensuring that this country’s laws are again made in Westminster, not Brussels or Luxembourg.

For 44 years our legal system has been controlled by the unelected judges of the European Court. This Bill puts legislative power back where it belongs – in the hands of British MPs and British judges.

Negotiating it will be an awesome task. All existing EU legislation must be transferred into British law before we can begin the process of throwing out the elements we don’t want.

And with thousands of individual pieces of legislation (which speaks volumes about how Brussels has insinuated itself into the minutiae of British life), two years is a tight schedule. But it must be done and Brexit Secretary David Davis knows he will secure a place in history if he can pull it off.

The real threat, of course, comes not from puffed-up, self-serving and often low-calibre Eurocrats. It comes from those in this country who want to do Britain down.

Unsurprisingly, their rhetoric is becoming increasingly hysterical. Former Cabinet Secretary Gus O’Donnell says leaving the EU will be like jumping out of an aeroplane without a parachute, while the Scottish Nationalists’ disruptive behaviour is as predictable as it is cynical.

But the real enemies within are the Liberal Democrats. With their pathetic little rump of MPs and pygmy leadership, they are pledging a guerrilla campaign by demanding a vote on every tiny legislative change. The Mail hesitates to use the word treachery to describe their conduct but for a party calling itself Democrat, to act in such an undemocratic way is appalling hypocrisy.

What is bitterly ironic is that those who claim Parliament must now vet every aspect of this Bill are the very same people who spent so many years giving away Parliament’s rights to Brussels. It is vital these wreckers are prevented from undermining our negotiations.

It’s also vital that with our economy growing strongly, employment at a record high and the world queuing up to trade with us, we enter those negotiations with confidence and optimism.

Britain now has one of the world’s most important high-technology hubs, three of the top ten universities (the EU has none), and our life science, pharmaceutical and automotive sectors are thriving. Deutsche Bank has just invested in a new London headquarters, other big financial institutions that threatened to move have not done so and the weaker pound is a huge aid to exporters.

And as we keep arguing, Britain buys far more goods and services from EU countries than we sell to them. Why on earth would German car manufacturers want a trade war that would hurt them considerably more than it would hurt us?

So Mrs May should continue to play her hand with the assurance she has shown so far. This is a time for strong nerve, a quality Mrs May seems to have in abundance.

*

 

Bias at the BBC

Early yesterday, the BBC breathlessly reported that Lloyd’s of London was setting up a new base in Brussels – citing it as evidence that Brexit was prompting an exodus of major companies.

Then came the real story. The new office would house just a handful of staff and virtually all the insurer’s business would still be done in London. Sadly, it was just another example of the BBC manipulating the news to suit its Europhile prejudices.

That’s not just dishonesty.

IT'S BAD JOURNALISM



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4366490/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-Repeal-Bill-real-enemies-within.html#ixzz4ctxJxb4e
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

MARCH 31-2017

H. F .1160 FREEDOM-WE ARE NOW ON OUR WAY!

 

 

DAILY MAIL COMMENT asks who WILL speak for England? -FEBRUARY 3-2016

 of the most dramatic moments in the history of Parliamentary

democracy. ... Bowing to the mood of the House, Chamberlain

declared war on Hitler the next day. .... by 'England', like Amery

in 1939, we mean the whole of the United Kingdom)?

MARCH 29-2017

.H. F .1159 FREEDOM IS OURS!

 BROKEN PROMISES

The decision of the DAILY MAIL to no longer support

BREXIT

is analogous to a newspaper that supported

THE END OF SLAVERY

(and what are we in reality but slaves withi HITLER'S

so-called

 EUROPEAN UNION)

to no longer do so because their was a

CHANGE OF EDITOR

was not in keeping with ONE of THE watchfull responsibilities of

the

FOURTH ESTATE

of our

CONSTITUTION.

THE ISSUE IN BOTH INSTANCES IS ABOUT

FREEDOM

OF

PERSON and COUNTRY

 

What could be more important in the lives of a people with

MAGNA CARTA

PETITION OF RIGHT

HABEAS CORPUS

TRIAL BY JURY...

IN ITS LONG ISLAND HISTORY IN THEIR ONCE

FREE INDEPENDENT  NATION STATE

OF

 
 ENGLAND

 IN OUR ISLAND HOME?

THANKFULLY , AT LEAST THE DAILY MAIL IS PERMITTING A SMALL BAND OF PATRIOTS TO CARRY ON THEIR ONCE CAMPAIGN  SUCH AS RICHARD LITTLEJOHN and others  who are UPHOLDING alone

OTHERS HAVE BROKEN

THE TRADITION OF A FREE PRESS AND AN IMPLIED PROMISE.

DECEMBER  8,2018

hH.F.1770

[A MATTER OF FACT!]

[A LIBERAL PEER SHOULD REMEMBER]

Did you know there is a worldwide semi-secret war against white people. It started in 1923, in every country that has mostly white people, or used to have mostly white people, they are immigrating people from other races as fast as they can get away with it. They are encouraging whites to marry someone from a different race. They are also lowering the financial conditions so that the whites that do marry and used to do well, don’t want to have children or not many, because of financial conditions.
 

The white people on Earth came from Mars and were quickly genetically changed by the 8th Density about 66,000 years ago so they can mate with any Human and Earth would have one people. This was done so we would all get along better and one race wouldn’t become dominant wipe out the other races that moved here. The black Africans started here and so far 5 other races immigrated here and the whites were 2nd last, the Oriental Asians were last about 63,000 years ago and the 8th Density treated them the same, it wasn’t the Andromeda Council, like I was told last week.
 

White people are unique, we are the only ones who commonly have different eye and hair color and on average are less evil and more spiritual than the other races, except about the same as the Oriental Asians, but this has a little bit to do with the living conditions the last 300 years, all races have good & bad people. It is commonly said in the main stream media that the whites are an evil race and want to go to war with everyone, after all they pretty much wiped out the natives in North and South America and then brought slaves here.
Well this isn’t quite right, Columbus, Cortez and Pizarro were all Illuminati and didn’t have Human souls, they had the Reptilian lower soul, with little empathy for others.

The slaves were bought here on Jewish ships, most of the Jewish ship owners were Illuminati also. There were also white slaves (mostly Irish) and about 7,000 black slave owners in the USA. Less than 1 in 1,000 white people owned slaves and were constantly programmed that blacks were inferior from authorities, so the non slave owning whites would accept it.

The non slave owning Whites hated slavery, because they were forced by law to help capture run away slaves with no compensation and it was extremely hard to get a high paying job, with slaves doing a lot of work for free.

All the wars are started by and run by the Illuminati and Elite Jews. To many Whites are brainwashed to go along with the program, by the main stream media Which is all owned by the Jews or Illuminati.
 

Are you getting the picture, stop reading for a few seconds and see if you can figure it out. If there is no spiritual revolution, the brown dwarf star doesn’t come near the sun and damage Earth and the Illuminati and Elite Jews win, everyone else will become a worker/slaves. Whites won’t be allowed to marry or if they do they won’t be allowed to have children or if they do the paedophiles will take them. The only whites will be Illuminati or Jews and they will be in the ruling class, unelected and can’t be taken out of power.

 If you don’t want this future wake people up and help the spiritual revolution happen, become more spiritual. I think it’s going to happen and it’s called the Golden Age, it’s a wake up and win situation, but I think we’re going to get some wake up help. Even if your not White don’t accept that Whites should be wiped out, I certainly wouldn’t accept that Blacks should be wiped out or any other race. The only people I would accept being wiped out is the super evil ones. There will be a delightful place for everyone of every race in the Golden Age.
http://www.icheckyoursoul.com/

ADDED-JANUARY-2019

Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

what is the soul made of

afflict your souls in the bible

what is a person's soul

what is the soul of man

afflict your soul means

what is the soul according to the bible

afflict your soul kjv

what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

*

H.F.1424/2

 

 

Illuminati

The story starts about 45,000 years ago. There was a planet in an orbit closer to the sun than Jupiter. Many call this planet Maldek, Mars was it’s largest moon. The Reptilian people that lived there were very violent and negative. They went to war with the people that lived on Mars. They were greater in number, but the Martians had better technology. These people refused to quit attacking the peaceful Martians. So the Martians devised a plan to seriously damage Maldek, making it impossible for these people to stay there and get the war over. The weapon they used, turned out to be too strong and blew up Maldek, scattering pieces all over our solar system, making the asteroid belt, new moons for some of the outer planets and comets in the far reaches of our solar system.

About 8,000 of these Reptilian people were in large space ships and survived. So they decided to go live in our moon and kick out the few Draconians that lived there. The Reptilians (Draconians) soon returned in force. So they had to leave in a hurry, while their ships were being blasted and crash landed in Antarctica, which at that time was in a tropical area. Now they soon no longer had space flight, because of the Draconian continued attacks. They had trouble living on Earth as their bodies didn’t agree with Earth’s elements. Humanity had just came out of cataclysms caused by Maldek blowing up, so they were few in number and lost their technology and now were sort of primitive.

These people captured some Humans and using genetics made hybrids of themselves, so they could live on Earth. They made 2 kinds of hybrids, one kind was very similar to and could mate with Humanity. The other kind was different and had elongated heads and became the ruling class and could not mate with Humanity. There are still some of these left, although they stay secret. Within 2,000 years the brown dwarf star, came through our solar system as it does every 3,557 years. Earth was hit hard and had a devastating pole shift, making the south pole in about the center of Antarctica as it is today.

Most all of the people on Earth died as there was a flash freeze in the new polar areas, killing a lot of animals too. So the Reptilian-Mammal hybrid people that were similar to Humanity lived with and bred with Humanity. When one of their females had children, the children would get one of their souls, regardless of who the father is. These people, the Illuminati today can tell each other apart from Humanity, but Humanity can’t seem to tell that they have different souls. They arranged to put each other into positions of power, like kings and queens and still hold these positions today. Although with the invention of the internet and spreading of knowledge, they are starting to lose control.

With them in power, we have war, central banks, shortages and other forms of suffering. Because of them we live in a negative world. In 2021 our 3rd cycle will finish and positive soul groups get to move up to the 2nd realm, 5th dimension (4th density). We are in the 1st realm, 4th dimension (3rd density) now. So we must get the Illuminati out of power and turn positive, to move up to 4th density. A soul can either go through 1 cycle of 3rd or 4th density (or some of both) and make ascension to 5th density (12th dimension on Earth). If we get in 4th density life improves, our bodies will be a little better and matter a little different, the biggest change is another component of time. Many of us will gain some telepathy and see a wider range of the spectrum and other improvements.

ADDED-JANUARY-2019

Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

what is the soul made of

afflict your souls in the bible

what is a person's soul

what is the soul of man

afflict your soul means

what is the soul according to the bible

afflict your soul kjv

what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

*

 

FEBRUARY 5-2016

H.F.1424/2S

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

SEPTEMBER 28-2016

 

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

 

WELCOME!

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

Rothschilds surrender US Corporation bankrupt USA Republic accepts shared human destiny

The Satan worshipping cabal suffered crushing defeats last week on all fronts multiple sources agree. The biggest news is that US President Donald Trump announced last week that the cabal owned United States Corporation founded in 1861 has been replaced with the Republic of the United States of America that was founded in 1776. For details on this see here:

http://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.jp/

That is why the talk of US government functions shutting down on March 15th as the US $20 trillion debt limit was reached failed to materialize. The debt belonged to the Corporation, not the Republic. The Corporation has been declared bankrupt and the debt null and void, multiple sources agree. That is because United States Corporation Secretary of State and slave to Corporation top shareholder David Rockefeller Jr. Rex Tillerson failed in his effort to get funding for it in Asia last week, Asian secret society sources say.

Japanese imperial family sources say Rockefeller bagman Henry Kissinger showed up with Rex Tillerson and both threatened the Imperial family in a failed effort to get them to cash a bogus 4京(kei) yen (40 trillion dollar) World Bank bond so that they could keep the US Corporation going and place their flunky Ichiro Ozawa as Prime Minister of Japan. Ozawa is despised in Japanese government circles and will not be allowed near the Prime Minister’s office so the request was denied, Japanese right wing sources say.

However, the US military is determined to get rid of current Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Finance Minister Taro Aso, who blocked the deal, because they are desperate for funds to keep their international operations going. That is why they are flooding the Japanese media with stories exposing Abe’s scandals. Abe represents a faction of extreme right wingers who wanted to start a war with China and so is definitely tainted goods as well and will likely be removed.

There are ongoing discussions over exactly who to replace Abe with and the White Dragon Society is recommending the relatively clean and competent Hideo Higashikokubaru as an interim Prime Minister who would represent the consensus of the Japanese bureaucracy and other power brokers. Asian secret society sources, for their part, say there is no alternative to Abe at present and so he must be given a new script to read. The discussions are ongoing.

The Rothschilds and the Rockefellers also tried to keep themselves from going bankrupt by taking over North Korea. North Korea is the location of a vast treasure of

 

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

 

H.F.1158 FREEDOM IS AT HAND

 

 

QUENTIN LETTS: I fear Mrs May has no idea how angry Brexiteers are about this customs fudge

 

 

And still they fight, still they kick, gripping the bannister and screaming that no, no, no they are NOT going to go to school, are NOT going to eat their vegetables, are NOT going to bed.

Those of us who have been parents of young children know how it plays out, this sort of thing. They bite us, thump us on the chest, tell us they hate us and that we have ruined their lives.

We keep calm and quietly detach their pink little fingers from whatever anchor they have grasped.

Eventually — though with still much silent sobbing — they do what we have asked them to do because, in the end, there is no alternative. We are bigger. We are stronger.

Over the Bank Holiday weekend, members of our pro-Brussels elite had another of their spoilt-brat tantrums. 

This time, their front-person was Business Secretary Greg Clark, little-known to the public, but one of the Establishment’s more mellifluous schmoozers. Mr Clark, once a member of the SDP, is a determined Remainer.

On Sunday morning, with the approval of Downing Street, he appeared on television to re-ignite ‘Project Fear’ and predict thousands of job losses unless we subscribe to a version of the customs union after we have nominally left the European Union.

Within minutes, he was supported publicly by the usual suspects: the pro-EU Confederation of British Industry and the British Chambers of Commerce, former Home Secretary Amber Rudd, MPs Anna Soubry and Nicky Morgan, the George Soros-financed Best For Britain lobby, etc., all jumping to the EU’s tune. But please don’t suggest it was co-ordinated.

Mr Clark himself is a piffling figure. Let us not waste time by examining him, save to note that it is strange for a business minister to be such a plodder. Business fortunes are made by embracing opportunity and change, yet this Business Secretary possesses all the verve of a Fiat Punto driver pfaffing along in the middle lane of a motorway at 60mph.

More concerning is the fact that such an ardent Europhile was chosen to be the voice of Theresa May’s Government at such a sensitive time, and that he felt so comfortable spouting a line on the customs union that is so at odds with both last week’s decision by the inner Brexit Cabinet to reject it and with the political realities facing Mrs May.

 

Theresa May (pictured), or the Europhile advisers who surround her, must be mad to pursue their plan to shackle us to the EU with this back-door proposal for a customs union

She, or the Europhile advisers who surround her, must be mad to pursue their plan to shackle us to the EU with this back-door proposal for a customs union.

If they persist, they will bring about her destruction. The longer they continue to ignore this reality, the more her Eurosceptic colleagues will conclude that the benefits of getting rid of her could outweigh the dangers.

Greg Clark was supporting the idea — attributed to Mrs May’s senior Brexit adviser, a civil servant called Oliver Robbins — known as customs partnership.

This would force post-Brexit Britain to continue to collect import duties on behalf of the EU. It would be horrendously bureaucratic and would deter companies from doing business in an independent Britain.

The plan is opposed sharply by a large number of Tory MPs. They see it as both unworkable and unprincipled, because it would kill Brexit. (No wonder Labour goes along with the idea — for the time being. Jeremy Corbyn’s lot would love it because the Tories would get the blame for obstructing the democratic result of the June 2016 referendum.)

If Tory MPs did not know before last week that customs partnership would be fatal to their party’s future, they must know now.

Last Thursday’s local elections showed that Brexit remains a powerful vote-winner. Ukip voters migrated en bloc to the Tories because they see them as more Brexit-friendly than Labour.

he two ministers thought to be vulnerable to persuasion are Home Secretary Sajid Javid (pictured) and Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson. But both men fancy their chances as future Tory le

And yet the Prime Minister, while publicly reiterating her determination to leave the single market and the customs union, is prevaricating in private. She allows her Downing Street team, who for the main part were Remain supporters, to continue with their crazy appeasement of Brussels with this customs partnership proposal.

While it may be pointless to plead with politicians on policy grounds, we can surely agree that the one thing they really understand is personal self-interest. So from that vantage point, let us ‘wargame’ Mrs May’s options.

If she goes for the Robbins/Clark idea of a customs partnership, she would need to force one of her key Cabinet colleagues to change their mind.

The two ministers thought to be vulnerable to persuasion are Home Secretary Sajid Javid and Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson. But both men fancy their chances as future Tory leaders. 

 

Slaughted

 

 

If they did cave in to Mrs May’s pleas to re-think their position on customs partnership, they could immediately forget any dreams of being leader. The Tory Party in the country would never vote for such a person.

Even if Mrs May did manage to ‘fix’ the Cabinet committee to rethink its position on customs partnership, she would have to contend with her backbenchers. Uh oh. She would be slaughtered.

Scores of Tory MPs are far less polite about the Robbins/Clark plan than Jacob Rees-Mogg, who is their spokesman on this issue. And even the gentlemanly Jacob has called it ‘cretinous’!

Under Conservative party rules, it needs only 48 MPs to trigger a vote of confidence in Theresa May’s leadership. If she green-lights customs partnership, that will happen within hours.

I fear she simply has no idea how angry Brexiteers are about this plan, or about the Whitehall establishment’s continuing attempts to stymie Brexit. The mood is one of tranquil resolve: if the Prime Minister tries this outrageous anti-democratic move, it’s off-with-her-head.

 

Weariness

 

Would any of this lead to a General Election? Until last week, I would have said no way. An early General Election requires a two-thirds majority from the Commons and, with hard-Left Opposition, I did not think the Tories would risk it. But the encouraging local election results might just tempt them.

The Opposition will always support a chance of unseating a Government, and pro-Brexit MPs know that an election would see off some of the leading Remainers. Ken Clarke would most likely retire. One hears similar rumours about Dominic Grieve, and Miss Soubry would probably lose her strongly pro-Brexit seat.

Yet that fine woman ‘Brenda from Bristol’ spoke for many of us last year by expressing weariness at the prospect of yet another election.

That is why Mrs May will surely take Option Two — which is the only option she should ever have contemplated — and accept that we will not continue in any form of customs union with Brussels after we have left the EU.

If Brexit is to mean Brexit, it must mean independence from foreign tariffs and taxes and blether and bureaucracy.

Stop this damaging and demeaning dither, Prime Minister. Put Greg Clark back in his boring box and set our economy free. It makes principled, electoral sense — and the alternative is too horrible to contemplate.

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5701681/QUENTIN-LETTS-fear-Mrs-no-idea-angry-Brexiteers-are.html#ixzz5F0zViC5N
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

Facebook

 

 

 

H.F.1546

 

 
 

September 2015.

Thousands of Syrian migrants crossing the Balkan route were heading toward Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel was on the phone with Interior Minister Thomas de Maizičre, talking about a number of measures to protect the borders, where thousands of policemen were secretly located along with buses and helicopters. De Maizičre turned for advice to Dieter Romann, then head of the police. "Can we live with the images that will come out?" de Mazičre asked. "What happens if 500 refugees with children in their arms run toward the border guards?"

De Maiziére was told that the appropriate use of the measures to be taken would have be decided by the police on the field. When de Maizičre relayed Romann's response to the Chancellor, Merkel reversed her original commitment. And the borders were opened for 180 days.

"For historical reasons, the Chancellor feared images of armed German police confronting civilians on our borders," writes Robin Alexander, Die Welt's leading journalist, who revealed these details in a new book, Die Getriebenen ("The Driven Ones"). Alexander reveals the real reason that pushed Merkel to open the door to a million and a half migrants in a few weeks: "In the end, Merkel refused to take responsibility, governing through the polls." This is how the famous Merkel's motto "Wir schaffen das" was born:

"We can do it."

According to Die Zeit:

"Merkel and her people are convinced that the marchers could only be stopped with the help of violence: with water cannons, truncheons and pepper spray. It would be chaotic and the images would be horrific. Merkel is extremely wary of such images and of their political impact, and she is convinced that Germany wouldn't tolerate them. Merkel once said that Germany wouldn't be able to stand the images from the dismal conditions in the refugee camp at Calais for more than three days. But how much more devastating would images be of refugees being beaten as they try to get to Austria or Germany?"

Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television images spread all over the world. In so many key moments, it is the photograph that dictates our behavior: the image that dishonors us, that makes us cringe in horror.

Now, the main German sentiment that seems to be driving public opinion and politics is a dramatic sense of guilt. It is a "secular sin", according to a new book by German sociologist Rolf Peter Sieferle that is topping the German bestseller list, "Finis Germania".

The behavior of Germans during the current migrant crisis, however, is symbolic of a more general Western condition. On April 30, 1975, the fall of Saigon was part of a war fought and lost by the United States as much on television as in the Vietnamese forests and rice paddies. It ended with the the escape of helicopters from the rooftop of the US embassy.

In 1991, the imagery of the "highway of death" of Saddam Hussein's bombed army of thugs fleeing a plundered Kuwait also shocked the public in the West, and led to calls for an immediate cessation of the fighting in Iraq and Kuwait. The result was that Saddam Hussein's air force and Republican Guard divisions were spared; during the "peace" that followed, it was these troops who butchered Kurds and Shiites.

The photograph of a dead American soldier dragged through the streets of Mogadishu after the "Black Hawk Down" incident pushed President Bill Clinton to order a shameful retreat from Somalia. That photograph also led the US Administration to rethink and cancel plans to use US troops for United Nations peace operations in Bosnia, Haiti and other strategic points. General David Petraeus would describe America's engagement in Afghanistan as a "war of perception".

Even the suffering of our enemies disturbs us, in the humanitarian culture of the West. We are therefore increasingly amenable to policies of appeasement, censorship and retreat, in order not to have to face the possibility of such horribleness and actually having to fight it.

That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We have paralysed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic photos of the terrorists' victims and even the faces and names of the jihadists. The Islamic terrorists, on the other hand, are not publicity-seekers; they are soldiers ready to die and kill in the name of what they care about.

This week, the German media was shocked by the revelation that the German air force will probably come under fire during its Syrian mission. "Endangering German soldiers!" -- with an exclamation point -- wrote Bild, the largest-selling newspaper in Germany. The statement exposed the anxiety of what John Vinocur of the Wall Street Journal called a "country where the army and air force basically do not fight". A pacifist Germany is now a source of trouble also for its own neighbors, such as Poland. "For centuries, our main worry in Poland was a very strong German army", said former Polish Defense Minister Janusz Onyszkiewicz. "Today, we're seriously worried about German armed forces that are too weak."

The Western establishment censors images of our enemies' crimes while giving prominence to our "guilt". The French government censored the "gruesome torture" of the victims at the Bataclan Theater, who were castrated, disemboweled and had their eyes gouged out by the Islamist terrorists. It was a mistake: it was in the public interest to know exactly what enemy we are facing.

The FBI and Department of Justice released a transcript of the Orlando jihadist's 911 call, but omitted all reference to the terror group ISIS and to Islam. These authorities did not want the public to know that Omar Mateen identified himself as an "Islamic soldier".

The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance then told the British press it should not report when terrorists are Muslim.

The CEO of Twitter, Dick Costolo, suspended accounts that showed photographs of the beheading of John Foley, along with other Islamist beheadings and savagery. But Twitter did not mind being flooded by images of a little dead boy, Alan (Aylan) Kurdi on a beach.

The mainstream media in the US fought hard to lift the photo ban on military coffins during the war in Iraq. Its goal, apparently, was to humiliate and intimidate the public, to lower the support for the war.

Images, as in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, are published only if they amplify the West's sense of guilt and turn the "war on terror" into something more even more dangerous than the jihad causing the war.

Amnesty International's Secretary General, Irene Khan -- referring to concentration camps in the Soviet Union, where millions of people perished -- infamously called Guantanamo "the Gulag of our time". The result is to erase our enemy from our imagination. This is how the "war on terror" has become synonymous with lawlessness throughout the West.

Ten years ago, after the brave surge in Iraq, US soldiers discovered Al Qaeda's torture chambers. No one -- not ABC, not CBS, not the New York Times -- published one photo of them; they just filled our eyes with naked bodies at Abu Ghraib.

We are utopian technophiles and, contrary to the traditional Western view that we are flawed human beings in a tragic world. We now believe in Mark Zuckerberg's brave new world where no one should ever suffer and everyone should be happy and peaceful all the time. That is an exorbitant dream. For a short time we can afford it, as with Angela Merkel and Europe's migrant crisis. Unfortunately, that fantasy will not last. The conflicts at our gates, together with our aversion to making hard choices, will exact a far higher price.

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.

*

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis?

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10603/radical-islam-west
    5 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Zero Hedge

    www.zerohedge.com/.../radical-islam-horrifying-west-paralysis
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Net News

    world.news.sorozatwiki.hu/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    2 days ago ... Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,German Chancellor
    Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Latest News ...

    todaynewsheadlines.444.hu/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    2 days ago ... Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,German Chancellor
    Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis? | Elite Trader

    https://www.elitetrader.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis.311003/
    1 day ago ... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10603/radical-islam-west.
     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? - Long Room

    https://www.longroom.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis? - Sharia Watch UK

    www.shariawatch.org.uk/?q.../radical-islam-horrifying-west-paralysis
    4 days ago ... German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of
    humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television ...

     

    Richard Falknor on Twitter: ""Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West ...

    https://twitter.com/i/web/status/884146467518246913
    13 hours ago ... "Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis?" Lost Our Will To Survive?
    http://tinyurl.com/ya3hatga We can't even fight the corrupt ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | State of Globe

    stateofglobe.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis/
    3 days ago ... Source: Zero Hedge Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,
    German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | NewZSentinel

    newzsentinel.com/is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis/
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     
  1. What Is Radicalisation? - Childline Is Here To Help

    Ad                   www.childline.org.uk/

*  *  *

FOREIGN  AID

[IF ALL THE RESOURCES OF FOREIGN AID FROM GERMANY-BRITAIN-USA AND FROM OTHER COUNTRIES HAD BEEN UTILIZED EARLY TO DEAL WITH POSSIBLE ONE OF THE WORST EXAMPLES OF THE  AFFECTS OF GREED ON THE POLICIES OF WHAT ARE CONSIDERED MORAL NATIONS AT THE OUTSET OF THIS DEMOGRAPHIC DISASTER WE WOULD NOT BE IN THE DISASTROUS SITUATION THAT THE PEOPLE OF EUROPE AND BRITAIN [ENGLAND] NOW FIND THEMSELVES.

WE ARE NOW INFORMED THAT 7 OUT OF 10 OF THOSE SEEKING A HOME IN EUROPE ARE NOT REFUGEES - BUT ECONOMIC MIGRANTS. WHICH CONFIRMS THAT AN EARLY RECOGNITION OF THIS FACT WOULD SHOW IN WHICH DIRECTION THE WEST'S OBJECTIVE SHOULD PROCEEED. 

THE FAULT FOR THIS MASSIVE EXODUS FROM THE MIDDLE EAST RESTS WITH THE POLITICIANS OF THE USA AND BRITAIN AND OTHER HISTORICAL OIL DISTRIBUTION NATIONS MANY STILL CAPTIVE WHO ARE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE UK WITH BREXIT TO HAND ARE BUT REGIONS WITHIN A NAZI-PLANNED EUROPEAN UNION WHICH NOW FINDS ITSELF THE VICTIM OF ITS OWN MAKING.  INDIVIDUAL NATION STATES WOULD HAVE SEEN CLEARLY THE RISKS BUT AS SHOWN BY THE ARTICLE ABOVE THEY DID NOT SEE THE DEMOGRAPHIC DISASTER UNTIL IT WAS UPON THEM.]

*

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 10-2017

H F 1250BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER.

 

 

 

September 2015.

Thousands of Syrian migrants crossing the Balkan route were heading toward Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel was on the phone with Interior Minister Thomas de Maizičre, talking about a number of measures to protect the borders, where thousands of policemen were secretly located along with buses and helicopters. De Maizičre turned for advice to Dieter Romann, then head of the police. "Can we live with the images that will come out?" de Mazičre asked. "What happens if 500 refugees with children in their arms run toward the border guards?"

De Maiziére was told that the appropriate use of the measures to be taken would have be decided by the police on the field. When de Maizičre relayed Romann's response to the Chancellor, Merkel reversed her original commitment. And the borders were opened for 180 days.

"For historical reasons, the Chancellor feared images of armed German police confronting civilians on our borders," writes Robin Alexander, Die Welt's leading journalist, who revealed these details in a new book, Die Getriebenen ("The Driven Ones"). Alexander reveals the real reason that pushed Merkel to open the door to a million and a half migrants in a few weeks: "In the end, Merkel refused to take responsibility, governing through the polls." This is how the famous Merkel's motto "Wir schaffen das" was born:

"We can do it."

According to Die Zeit:

"Merkel and her people are convinced that the marchers could only be stopped with the help of violence: with water cannons, truncheons and pepper spray. It would be chaotic and the images would be horrific. Merkel is extremely wary of such images and of their political impact, and she is convinced that Germany wouldn't tolerate them. Merkel once said that Germany wouldn't be able to stand the images from the dismal conditions in the refugee camp at Calais for more than three days. But how much more devastating would images be of refugees being beaten as they try to get to Austria or Germany?"

Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television images spread all over the world. In so many key moments, it is the photograph that dictates our behavior: the image that dishonors us, that makes us cringe in horror.

Now, the main German sentiment that seems to be driving public opinion and politics is a dramatic sense of guilt. It is a "secular sin", according to a new book by German sociologist Rolf Peter Sieferle that is topping the German bestseller list, "Finis Germania".

The behavior of Germans during the current migrant crisis, however, is symbolic of a more general Western condition. On April 30, 1975, the fall of Saigon was part of a war fought and lost by the United States as much on television as in the Vietnamese forests and rice paddies. It ended with the the escape of helicopters from the rooftop of the US embassy.

In 1991, the imagery of the "highway of death" of Saddam Hussein's bombed army of thugs fleeing a plundered Kuwait also shocked the public in the West, and led to calls for an immediate cessation of the fighting in Iraq and Kuwait. The result was that Saddam Hussein's air force and Republican Guard divisions were spared; during the "peace" that followed, it was these troops who butchered Kurds and Shiites.

The photograph of a dead American soldier dragged through the streets of Mogadishu after the "Black Hawk Down" incident pushed President Bill Clinton to order a shameful retreat from Somalia. That photograph also led the US Administration to rethink and cancel plans to use US troops for United Nations peace operations in Bosnia, Haiti and other strategic points. General David Petraeus would describe America's engagement in Afghanistan as a "war of perception".

Even the suffering of our enemies disturbs us, in the humanitarian culture of the West. We are therefore increasingly amenable to policies of appeasement, censorship and retreat, in order not to have to face the possibility of such horribleness and actually having to fight it.

That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We have paralysed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic photos of the terrorists' victims and even the faces and names of the jihadists. The Islamic terrorists, on the other hand, are not publicity-seekers; they are soldiers ready to die and kill in the name of what they care about.

This week, the German media was shocked by the revelation that the German air force will probably come under fire during its Syrian mission. "Endangering German soldiers!" -- with an exclamation point -- wrote Bild, the largest-selling newspaper in Germany. The statement exposed the anxiety of what John Vinocur of the Wall Street Journal called a "country where the army and air force basically do not fight". A pacifist Germany is now a source of trouble also for its own neighbors, such as Poland. "For centuries, our main worry in Poland was a very strong German army", said former Polish Defense Minister Janusz Onyszkiewicz. "Today, we're seriously worried about German armed forces that are too weak."

The Western establishment censors images of our enemies' crimes while giving prominence to our "guilt". The French government censored the "gruesome torture" of the victims at the Bataclan Theater, who were castrated, disemboweled and had their eyes gouged out by the Islamist terrorists. It was a mistake: it was in the public interest to know exactly what enemy we are facing.

The FBI and Department of Justice released a transcript of the Orlando jihadist's 911 call, but omitted all reference to the terror group ISIS and to Islam. These authorities did not want the public to know that Omar Mateen identified himself as an "Islamic soldier".

The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance then told the British press it should not report when terrorists are Muslim.

The CEO of Twitter, Dick Costolo, suspended accounts that showed photographs of the beheading of John Foley, along with other Islamist beheadings and savagery. But Twitter did not mind being flooded by images of a little dead boy, Alan (Aylan) Kurdi on a beach.

The mainstream media in the US fought hard to lift the photo ban on military coffins during the war in Iraq. Its goal, apparently, was to humiliate and intimidate the public, to lower the support for the war.

Images, as in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, are published only if they amplify the West's sense of guilt and turn the "war on terror" into something more even more dangerous than the jihad causing the war.

Amnesty International's Secretary General, Irene Khan -- referring to concentration camps in the Soviet Union, where millions of people perished -- infamously called Guantanamo "the Gulag of our time". The result is to erase our enemy from our imagination. This is how the "war on terror" has become synonymous with lawlessness throughout the West.

Ten years ago, after the brave surge in Iraq, US soldiers discovered Al Qaeda's torture chambers. No one -- not ABC, not CBS, not the New York Times -- published one photo of them; they just filled our eyes with naked bodies at Abu Ghraib.

We are utopian technophiles and, contrary to the traditional Western view that we are flawed human beings in a tragic world. We now believe in Mark Zuckerberg's brave new world where no one should ever suffer and everyone should be happy and peaceful all the time. That is an exorbitant dream. For a short time we can afford it, as with Angela Merkel and Europe's migrant crisis. Unfortunately, that fantasy will not last. The conflicts at our gates, together with our aversion to making hard choices, will exact a far higher price.

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.

*

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis?

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10603/radical-islam-west
    5 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Zero Hedge

    www.zerohedge.com/.../radical-islam-horrifying-west-paralysis
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Net News

    world.news.sorozatwiki.hu/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    2 days ago ... Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,German Chancellor
    Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Latest News ...

    todaynewsheadlines.444.hu/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    2 days ago ... Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,German Chancellor
    Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis? | Elite Trader

    https://www.elitetrader.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis.311003/
    1 day ago ... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10603/radical-islam-west.
     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? - Long Room

    https://www.longroom.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis? - Sharia Watch UK

    www.shariawatch.org.uk/?q.../radical-islam-horrifying-west-paralysis
    4 days ago ... German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of
    humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television ...

     

    Richard Falknor on Twitter: ""Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West ...

    https://twitter.com/i/web/status/884146467518246913
    13 hours ago ... "Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis?" Lost Our Will To Survive?
    http://tinyurl.com/ya3hatga We can't even fight the corrupt ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | State of Globe

    stateofglobe.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis/
    3 days ago ... Source: Zero Hedge Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,
    German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | NewZSentinel

    newzsentinel.com/is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis/
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     
  1. What Is Radicalisation? - Childline Is Here To Help

    Ad                   www.childline.org.uk/

*  *  *

FOREIGN  AID

[IF ALL THE RESOURCES OF FOREIGN AID FROM GERMANY-BRITAIN-USA AND FROM OTHER COUNTRIES HAD BEEN UTILIZED EARLY TO DEAL WITH POSSIBLE ONE OF THE WORST EXAMPLES OF THE  AFFECTS OF GREED ON THE POLICIES OF WHAT ARE CONSIDERED MORAL NATIONS AT THE OUTSET OF THIS DEMOGRAPHIC DISASTER WE WOULD NOT BE IN THE DISASTROUS SITUATION THAT THE PEOPLE OF EUROPE AND BRITAIN [ENGLAND] NOW FIND THEMSELVES.

WE ARE NOW INFORMED THAT 7 OUT OF 10 OF THOSE SEEKING A HOME IN EUROPE ARE NOT REFUGEES - BUT ECONOMIC MIGRANTS. WHICH CONFIRMS THAT AN EARLY RECOGNITION OF THIS FACT WOULD SHOW IN WHICH DIRECTION THE WEST'S OBJECTIVE SHOULD PROCEEED. 

THE FAULT FOR THIS MASSIVE EXODUS FROM THE MIDDLE EAST RESTS WITH THE POLITICIANS OF THE USA AND BRITAIN AND OTHER HISTORICAL OIL DISTRIBUTION NATIONS MANY STILL CAPTIVE WHO ARE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE UK WITH BREXIT TO HAND ARE BUT REGIONS WITHIN A NAZI-PLANNED EUROPEAN UNION WHICH NOW FINDS ITSELF THE VICTIM OF ITS OWN MAKING.  INDIVIDUAL NATION STATES WOULD HAVE SEEN CLEARLY THE RISKS BUT AS SHOWN BY THE ARTICLE ABOVE THEY DID NOT SEE THE DEMOGRAPHIC DISASTER UNTIL IT WAS UPON THEM.]

*

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 10-2017

H F 1250BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER.

 

 
 

SO WILL BRITAIN ONE DAY BE  MUSLIM?

by

Ruth Dudley Edwards

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

*

Our failure to have children.

Welfarism.

Political Correctness.

And a

LACK of WILL

 to fight Islamic extremism

 

 

 

THIS WEEK has been another terrible one for those of us who want a society in which all races, religions and cultures mix to their mutual advantage and

ENRICHMENT.

On Tuesday, five men were sentenced to life in prison for plotting to use a huge fertiliser bomb in what would have been the UK's largest mass murder.

Omar Khyam, Salahuddin Amin, Anthony Garciaand Jawa Akbar -first and second generation immigrants - responded to the tolerance of the British people

BY TRYING TO KILL AS MANY OF THEM AS POSSIBLE.

It is absurd to hope that the exposure of their evil after a 13-month trial which cost an estimated

Ł50,000,000

-has finally provided the wake-up call that this slumbering country so badly needs?

I'm one of those old-fashioned immigrants to this country who feels passionately grateful, is proudly British (as well as Irish -having been born in Dublin) and believes that immigrants have more duties than rights. And further, that one of those is to adjust to British society rather than expecting it to adjust to them. [ has been the practice for some decades but more so during the Blair years.]

However, one aspect of contemporary British society which I refuse to adjust to is its weakness in the face of the

ENEMY WITHIN

In my many conversations with like-minded people about the threat that radical Islam poses to the

 BRITISH WAY OF LIFE

-And indeed, to European civilisation -we frequently end by despairingly agreeing that the

WEST

-seems intention committing

POLITICAL and CULTURAL

SUICIDE.

When we look starkly at the demographic statistics, the wimpishness of our

ESTABLISHMENT

-in the face of the

THREAT

-the perversions perpetuated by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-and our passivity, it's hard to avoid the

CONCLUSION

-that within a couple of generations

ISLAM

-will be in

CONTROL of EUROPE

And before anyone says that there nothing wrong if this happened, since the vast majority of

MUSLIMS

are tolerant people who would not dream of interfering with

OUR WAY OF LIFE

-it's necessary  to point out that in

MUSLIM COUNTRIES

, it's usually the radicals and extremists

MULLAHS

-who regard

TOLERANCE

AS A VICE

-WHO MAKE THE RUNNING.

This occurs too in microcosm in

MUSLIM GHETTOS

around

EUROPE

We saw the frightening fundamentalist fringe of

ISLAM

-marching, threatening and perpetuating violence over the cartoons depicting

MOHAMMAD

IN

DENMARK

while the majority of Muslims - who, yes, of course are tolerant and decent - kept their mouths shut and stayed at

HOME

YES, Islam may be a great religion. BUT

-in its fundamentalist version, some of its values are antipathetic to ours, and if they triumph in

EUROPE 

-they will

THREATEN OUR VALUES

such as

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

and

SPEECH

and the spirit of intellectual inquiry that made

EUROPEAN CIVILISATION

Great and Prosperous

 

The danger of ending up like these poor, despotic and medieval

Islamic States

-in which millions live miserably is the prospect that

CHRISTIANS

HINDUS

MODERATE MUSLIMS and NON-BELIEVERS -should be uniting

TO PREVENT

 

BUT THE TRUTH IS WE ARE DOING LITTLE TO STOP IT.

Consider first a few chilling statistics.

EUROPEANS ARE FAILING TO REPRODUCE

[Yet in our own island millions of potential citizens have been 

SLAUGHTERED AT BIRTH

thanks to David Steels -Abortion Bill of 1965?

It is still taking place in 2007 though there is NOW an  growing awareness of the tragedy to the potential mother and to society in general that many more doctors today are refusing to condone the

MURDER.

Recently the sight of full grown foetuses being deprived of their lives has now brought the horror and injustice of the action to destroy life.

In an age of contraception of many devices and anti-life pills it is unbelievable that any potential mother was unable to take the necessary steps to prevent conception.

David Steels Bill was to prevent back-street abortions and he himself a few ears ago voiced his concern as to what has happened over the years since.]

*

Consider  first a few chilling statistics.

Europeans are failing to reproduce. Just to keep the population steady, you need 2.1 births per women

[This is a case for Government action by offering cash and other vital services to enable the reluctant mother to do her best for her community and country.]

However in 2005, the European average was 1.38.

In Ireland it was 1.9

France it was 1.89

Germany 1.35

Italy 1.23

Britain scored in the middle of this range with 1.6

BUT

That was because - like France - we have a large

MUSLIM POPULATION

with a high birth rate. Indeed,

MUSLIMS

are out breeding

 non-Muslims

through out

 EUROPE

 

 

[Many of whom have absolutely no intention of integrating -

Thank you very much Mr Blair -we don't think so.]

'Just look at the development within Europe.'

said a triumphant Norwegian Imam a few months ago

'where the number of

MUSLIMS

is expanding like mosquitoes.

Every Western women in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim women in the same countries is producing an average of 3.5 children.

'OUR WAY OF THINKING WILL PROVE MORE POWERFUL THAN YOURS' he said.

The big question this poses is:

WHY ARE WE NOT REPRODUCING?

There are many reasons, but probably the most important are the decline of religion and the liberation of women.

[The populations which have the stronger religious stance will be the eventual rulers of Europe. It can be a Christian Europe or a Muslim Europe. The Governments of Europe and the shrinking United Kingdom have to decide.]

In Ireland, when the Roman Catholic Church effectively ran society, sex for procreation, contraceptives were banned, the normal size for a family was around five or six children, bur 12 or 13 were not uncommon.

As the country embraced secularism in the 1980s, birth rates plummeted, exacerbated by the new -found confidence of women that made them choose careers rather than domesticity.

WHEREAS in the 1970s, I was regarded in both the UK and Ireland as odd for being married but voluntarily childless, these days, childlessness |

IS A COMMON CHOICE

It is a world where one-child families abound and to have more than two children is to be regarded as eccentric and probably environmentally irresponsible.

Moreover, the erosion of family life and the long - hours culture place a heavy burden on those prepared to rear the next generation.

Despite these social forces, even in the UK, devote Muslims and Orthodox Jews obey instructions to have large families.

Confronted with this demographic revolution and official statistics which showed there were too few young people to support an ageing population, European governments decided to embrace

IMMIGRATION

-as an inherent good without any thought for the consequences.

As a result, politicians and businessmen assured us that we had to have economic growth in n order to prop up ever greater public spending and that it could be provided only by importing large numbers of workers from abroad

BUT WHY WASN'T THERE A NATIONAL DEBATE

ABOUT

Whether it was wise to mortgage our cultural future for the sake of a mess of financial pottage?

[A recent report on the cost  and benefit of large scale

IMMIGRATION

estimated that the country benefited by

ONLY - 50p

 for each migrant]

Where were the politicians arguing against the doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow

ILLEGITIMATE

Who among the liberal elite's commentariat were challenging the moral relativism that flew in the face of

SENSE and SENSIBILITY

-by insisting that the culture of

Shakespeare

The King James Bible

Keats's poetry

Turner's paintings

and

Elgar's music

-was no more important than - the cultures of other

IMPORTED MINORITIES?

 

We know the answer all too well.

Cries of racism drowned out rational argument - not just here but throughout

OLD EUROPE

As one gloomster put it:

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which is thought what

SENTIMENTALITY is to COMPASSION

-means that the intelligentsia of the

WEST

-has disarmed itself in advance of any possible struggle.

The result of all this, as recent events have made tragically clear, was that

BRITISH CULTURE

-was

UNDERMINED and SOCIAL COHESION

DAMAGED.

Separated from mainstream society by geographical and cultural apartheid, which has been fostered by

MULTICULTURALISM

-many immigrants were denied the chance to

INTEGRATE.

 

AND, INSTEAD OF BEING TOLD BY THE HOST COMMUNITY

THAT IF THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ADHERE

-to the values of a liberal, pluralist democracy, they should

RETURN HOME

They were asked how they would like

BRITAIN

-to conform to

THEIR VALUES.

THE STORY WAS VERY MUCH THE SAME THROUGHOUT EUROPE

The robust American political commentator Mark Steyn, a disillusioned Anglophile has already written us off. The thesis of his Blackly comic book,

*

America Alone:

The End Of The World As We Know It

*

-is that the U.S. will survive because the

RELIGIOUS RIGHT ARE CONFIDENT

 AND

 REPRODUCE

BUT

 THAT EUROPE IS FINISHED

Its not just demographic decline, he says, it's also the unsustainability of the

MODERN WELFARE STATE

-in which we depend so much on our own individual resources.

We are also, he believes, suffering from 'civilisational exhaustion':

CULTURAL DISINTEGRATION

-brought about by

BIG GOVERNMENT

[Or if you prefer BIG BROTHER]

-which has fatally

DESTROYED OUR SENSE OF SELF-RELIANCE.

 

MEANWHILE, we are importing large numbers of unemployed youths from abroad in order to maintain

OUR

STANDARD OF LIVING

Yet many of these newcomers have nothing

BUT

CONTEMPT

 FOR OUR

WAY OF LIFE

-and some even wish

TO DESTROY IT

Steyn sees this as a

CIVIL WAR

which

EUROPE

-is too timid even to acknowledge - let alone

LET ALONE WIN

[This is something the Tory Mr Oliver Letwin or as we have said on a number of occasions Mr Let-them-win -and they will, who appears to be out of touch with the real issues that matter to our country in the early years of the 21st century.]

Mr Steyn says:

'Islam has youth and WILL

Europe has age and WELFARE.'

It's hard not to agree with Mark Steyn, especially as every day seems to bring more evidence

THAT AS A SOCIETY

WE ARE TERMINALLY

MAD

For example, this week's fertiliser bomb trial had heard that the key plotters had been radicalised by the hate preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed whom the judge condemned as

'a master of cowardice -who works in the shadows.'

This was the same firebrand who as an asylum -seeker here, had pocketed

Ł275,000

-in Welfare benefits.

[It is the same mentality shown by

Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer and many others

-who instead of spending the Ł32 million allocated for building prisons a few years ago are now doing almost anything in order to keep thousands of criminals many repeat offenders and dangerous, out of prison and giving many early release so they can go back to torment their victims and as has happened in a number of occasions returned to have another go at their robbery or other offence knowing that the worst that might happen is either a holiday or community service or whatever  and as many prisons these days are very much like 5star hotels there will be no hardship encountered if they are so lucky to win the prison admission lottery -then it will be a nice break to see old friends and anyway they will be out before they have completed their degree in political science or whatever.

The victims of crime, many of them elderly - poor and lonely won't as a rule be free of fear of their tormentor returning for a second or even third try to rob them of the little they have  and as has happened even assault and kill the defenceless pensioner - but some victims even lose heart and end their own lives by depriving themselves of food because they have lost hope that they can be safe again and we have their so-called protectors such as The Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer the new 'Justice' Minister ? who says 'Jail's the wrong place for burglars' and others who are doing whatever they can to keep the criminals out of jail. If the Army can put up a temporary  barracks in double quick time then there would be spaces for all the thousands of criminals who should be

OUT OF THE COMMUNITY.

Of course there would be complaints that the conditions are not up to the standards of the 5star prisons that they have 'visited' over the years and anyway there is

Tony Blair's

1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

to keep them out of such uncomfortable surroundings which would not provide the 'key' service which has been introduced with their friendly solicitor providing a drugs service as an extra comfort.

THERE IS NO LONGER JUSTICE AS THE SENTENCE DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME

ANYMORE]

*

To continue:

Despite all this, I still believe there are grounds for hope - largely because Muslim hotheads have overplayed their hand by blowing people up, rioting in their neighbourhoods or broadcasting hate -filled speeches which alienate them from the host community.

*

 

[Well we are of the opinion that until the Government shows to the Muslim population that they will not give way on insisting that ALL newcomers and those already with us conform to

OUR RULE OF LAW

 

-and punish without hesitation any breaches of the Law and make it plain that anyone who is a threat to our country WILL BE extradited. BUT of course we have Tony Blair's 1998 Human Rights Act and articles within the 1951 British led Convention of Human Rights which will need amending.

It should be made quite clear that those who have no intention to

INTEGRATE

-should be reminded of their commitment which they gave when they where granted immigration or asylum status (which should be a legal requirement in the future)

Unless drastic action is taken by the next Prime Minister as a priority , future generations of the indigenous population will find themselves foreigners in their own country with their religion and culture under growing  threat. The evidence is before our eyes it is a warning of what the future will bring if action is not taken

QUICKLY AND DECISIVELY

Those moderate Muslims will at last feel secure in the knowledge that they are safe from the extremist influence which up to now they have had it all their own way. By our commitment

IT WILL BE SECURITY THROUGH STRENGTH OF PURPOSE AND THE MUSLIMS WILL BE WITH US

Continue as NOW and they will have nothing but contempt for our indecision and inadequate moral integrity.]

*

To continue:

The sharp-suited, soft spoken undercover agents of the

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

-the banned Egyptian group whose former members include Osma Bin Laden -understand that power is best secured by

STEALTH

by infiltrating institutions and seducing the

MEDIA

Libya's Colonel Gaddafi once exemplified this policy

He said:

'There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe -without swords, without guns-without conquests. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.'

 

[AND THEY SURE MEAN IT]

 

 

[Our survival as a Christian nation can only be achieved by the Government reversing it's abhorrent legislation as to Religious freedom of speech and action because not to do so further emphasises to the extremist elements in our country that we are WEAK and AMORAL nation and therefore ready for conversion by stealth as their numbers obtain the victory while we ignore our Christian past at our peril.

Our close relations to America must be strengthened particularly in the moral arena so that our nations will gain the grudging respect of those who have a desire to replace our Christian heritage with their own.

There will be many who will say that we live in a secular environment and that the Government of the day should not concern itself but we have no choice we either support our Institutions and that includes our Christian inheritance which is ingrained into the very fabric of our nation or  lose that priceless heirloom the foundation of our IDENTITY and accept another more fanatical regime who do not believe in toleration but only in the observance of their one and only deliverer who will have no other faiths before it.

WE HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE

-because a vacuum must be filled and it is better that we know what contain.

The Choice Is Yours!

-but better it will be to retain our own heritage than be converted to another.]

*

But the violent extremists have provoked some signs of a backlash, not just among indigenous populations of Europe but among those tolerant immigrants who value the countries

THAT TOOK THEM IN

The Swedes, of all people, whom liberals claimed had produced a perfect society, are trying to row back on the

WELFARE STATE

-to encourage the

WORK ETHIC

and are demanding

THAT IMMIGRANTS INTEGRATE

 

Nyamko Sabuni a female, Muslim, African immigrant who is now the country's

INTEGRATION and EQUALITY

MINISTER

-insists that

ALL IMMIGRANTS

-should learn Swedish and find a job.

 

She is also intent on criminalising

FORCED MARRIAGES

CHECKING GIRLS FOR EVIDENCE OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION

and

BANNING THE VEIL

as well as

STATE FUNDING

for RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.

[This is an area that needs the new Premier Gordon Brown to put his attention as to make it plain that their is one

RULE OF LAW

in

ENGLAND

[NO EXCEPTIONS FOR MUSLIMS OR ANYONE ELSE IN OUR COUNTRY]

 

 

*          *          *

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

H.F.1294

 

 

SO WILL BRITAIN ONE DAY BE  MUSLIM?

by

Ruth Dudley Edwards

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

*

Our failure to have children.

Welfarism.

Political Correctness.

And a

LACK of WILL

 to fight Islamic extremism

 

 

 

THIS WEEK has been another terrible one for those of us who want a society in which all races, religions and cultures mix to their mutual advantage and

ENRICHMENT.

On Tuesday, five men were sentenced to life in prison for plotting to use a huge fertiliser bomb in what would have been the UK's largest mass murder.

Omar Khyam, Salahuddin Amin, Anthony Garciaand Jawa Akbar -first and second generation immigrants - responded to the tolerance of the British people

BY TRYING TO KILL AS MANY OF THEM AS POSSIBLE.

It is absurd to hope that the exposure of their evil after a 13-month trial which cost an estimated

Ł50,000,000

-has finally provided the wake-up call that this slumbering country so badly needs?

I'm one of those old-fashioned immigrants to this country who feels passionately grateful, is proudly British (as well as Irish -having been born in Dublin) and believes that immigrants have more duties than rights. And further, that one of those is to adjust to British society rather than expecting it to adjust to them. [ has been the practice for some decades but more so during the Blair years.]

However, one aspect of contemporary British society which I refuse to adjust to is its weakness in the face of the

ENEMY WITHIN

In my many conversations with like-minded people about the threat that radical Islam poses to the

 BRITISH WAY OF LIFE

-And indeed, to European civilisation -we frequently end by despairingly agreeing that the

WEST

-seems intention committing

POLITICAL and CULTURAL

SUICIDE.

When we look starkly at the demographic statistics, the wimpishness of our

ESTABLISHMENT

-in the face of the

THREAT

-the perversions perpetuated by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-and our passivity, it's hard to avoid the

CONCLUSION

-that within a couple of generations

ISLAM

-will be in

CONTROL of EUROPE

And before anyone says that there nothing wrong if this happened, since the vast majority of

MUSLIMS

are tolerant people who would not dream of interfering with

OUR WAY OF LIFE

-it's necessary  to point out that in

MUSLIM COUNTRIES

, it's usually the radicals and extremists

MULLAHS

-who regard

TOLERANCE

AS A VICE

-WHO MAKE THE RUNNING.

This occurs too in microcosm in

MUSLIM GHETTOS

around

EUROPE

We saw the frightening fundamentalist fringe of

ISLAM

-marching, threatening and perpetuating violence over the cartoons depicting

MOHAMMAD

IN

DENMARK

while the majority of Muslims - who, yes, of course are tolerant and decent - kept their mouths shut and stayed at

HOME

YES, Islam may be a great religion. BUT

-in its fundamentalist version, some of its values are antipathetic to ours, and if they triumph in

EUROPE 

-they will

THREATEN OUR VALUES

such as

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

and

SPEECH

and the spirit of intellectual inquiry that made

EUROPEAN CIVILISATION

Great and Prosperous

 

The danger of ending up like these poor, despotic and medieval

Islamic States

-in which millions live miserably is the prospect that

CHRISTIANS

HINDUS

MODERATE MUSLIMS and NON-BELIEVERS -should be uniting

TO PREVENT

 

BUT THE TRUTH IS WE ARE DOING LITTLE TO STOP IT.

Consider first a few chilling statistics.

EUROPEANS ARE FAILING TO REPRODUCE

[Yet in our own island millions of potential citizens have been 

SLAUGHTERED AT BIRTH

thanks to David Steels -Abortion Bill of 1965?

It is still taking place in 2007 though there is NOW an  growing awareness of the tragedy to the potential mother and to society in general that many more doctors today are refusing to condone the

MURDER.

Recently the sight of full grown foetuses being deprived of their lives has now brought the horror and injustice of the action to destroy life.

In an age of contraception of many devices and anti-life pills it is unbelievable that any potential mother was unable to take the necessary steps to prevent conception.

David Steels Bill was to prevent back-street abortions and he himself a few ears ago voiced his concern as to what has happened over the years since.]

*

Consider  first a few chilling statistics.

Europeans are failing to reproduce. Just to keep the population steady, you need 2.1 births per women

[This is a case for Government action by offering cash and other vital services to enable the reluctant mother to do her best for her community and country.]

However in 2005, the European average was 1.38.

In Ireland it was 1.9

France it was 1.89

Germany 1.35

Italy 1.23

Britain scored in the middle of this range with 1.6

BUT

That was because - like France - we have a large

MUSLIM POPULATION

with a high birth rate. Indeed,

MUSLIMS

are out breeding

 non-Muslims

through out

 EUROPE

 

 

[Many of whom have absolutely no intention of integrating -

Thank you very much Mr Blair -we don't think so.]

'Just look at the development within Europe.'

said a triumphant Norwegian Imam a few months ago

'where the number of

MUSLIMS

is expanding like mosquitoes.

Every Western women in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim women in the same countries is producing an average of 3.5 children.

'OUR WAY OF THINKING WILL PROVE MORE POWERFUL THAN YOURS' he said.

The big question this poses is:

WHY ARE WE NOT REPRODUCING?

There are many reasons, but probably the most important are the decline of religion and the liberation of women.

[The populations which have the stronger religious stance will be the eventual rulers of Europe. It can be a Christian Europe or a Muslim Europe. The Governments of Europe and the shrinking United Kingdom have to decide.]

In Ireland, when the Roman Catholic Church effectively ran society, sex for procreation, contraceptives were banned, the normal size for a family was around five or six children, bur 12 or 13 were not uncommon.

As the country embraced secularism in the 1980s, birth rates plummeted, exacerbated by the new -found confidence of women that made them choose careers rather than domesticity.

WHEREAS in the 1970s, I was regarded in both the UK and Ireland as odd for being married but voluntarily childless, these days, childlessness |

IS A COMMON CHOICE

It is a world where one-child families abound and to have more than two children is to be regarded as eccentric and probably environmentally irresponsible.

Moreover, the erosion of family life and the long - hours culture place a heavy burden on those prepared to rear the next generation.

Despite these social forces, even in the UK, devote Muslims and Orthodox Jews obey instructions to have large families.

Confronted with this demographic revolution and official statistics which showed there were too few young people to support an ageing population, European governments decided to embrace

IMMIGRATION

-as an inherent good without any thought for the consequences.

As a result, politicians and businessmen assured us that we had to have economic growth in n order to prop up ever greater public spending and that it could be provided only by importing large numbers of workers from abroad

BUT WHY WASN'T THERE A NATIONAL DEBATE

ABOUT

Whether it was wise to mortgage our cultural future for the sake of a mess of financial pottage?

[A recent report on the cost  and benefit of large scale

IMMIGRATION

estimated that the country benefited by

ONLY - 50p

 for each migrant]

Where were the politicians arguing against the doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow

ILLEGITIMATE

Who among the liberal elite's commentariat were challenging the moral relativism that flew in the face of

SENSE and SENSIBILITY

-by insisting that the culture of

Shakespeare

The King James Bible

Keats's poetry

Turner's paintings

and

Elgar's music

-was no more important than - the cultures of other

IMPORTED MINORITIES?

 

We know the answer all too well.

Cries of racism drowned out rational argument - not just here but throughout

OLD EUROPE

As one gloomster put it:

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which is thought what

SENTIMENTALITY is to COMPASSION

-means that the intelligentsia of the

WEST

-has disarmed itself in advance of any possible struggle.

The result of all this, as recent events have made tragically clear, was that

BRITISH CULTURE

-was

UNDERMINED and SOCIAL COHESION

DAMAGED.

Separated from mainstream society by geographical and cultural apartheid, which has been fostered by

MULTICULTURALISM

-many immigrants were denied the chance to

INTEGRATE.

 

AND, INSTEAD OF BEING TOLD BY THE HOST COMMUNITY

THAT IF THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ADHERE

-to the values of a liberal, pluralist democracy, they should

RETURN HOME

They were asked how they would like

BRITAIN

-to conform to

THEIR VALUES.

THE STORY WAS VERY MUCH THE SAME THROUGHOUT EUROPE

The robust American political commentator Mark Steyn, a disillusioned Anglophile has already written us off. The thesis of his Blackly comic book,

*

America Alone:

The End Of The World As We Know It

*

-is that the U.S. will survive because the

RELIGIOUS RIGHT ARE CONFIDENT

 AND

 REPRODUCE

BUT

 THAT EUROPE IS FINISHED

Its not just demographic decline, he says, it's also the unsustainability of the

MODERN WELFARE STATE

-in which we depend so much on our own individual resources.

We are also, he believes, suffering from 'civilisational exhaustion':

CULTURAL DISINTEGRATION

-brought about by

BIG GOVERNMENT

[Or if you prefer BIG BROTHER]

-which has fatally

DESTROYED OUR SENSE OF SELF-RELIANCE.

 

MEANWHILE, we are importing large numbers of unemployed youths from abroad in order to maintain

OUR

STANDARD OF LIVING

Yet many of these newcomers have nothing

BUT

CONTEMPT

 FOR OUR

WAY OF LIFE

-and some even wish

TO DESTROY IT

Steyn sees this as a

CIVIL WAR

which

EUROPE

-is too timid even to acknowledge - let alone

LET ALONE WIN

[This is something the Tory Mr Oliver Letwin or as we have said on a number of occasions Mr Let-them-win -and they will, who appears to be out of touch with the real issues that matter to our country in the early years of the 21st century.]

Mr Steyn says:

'Islam has youth and WILL

Europe has age and WELFARE.'

It's hard not to agree with Mark Steyn, especially as every day seems to bring more evidence

THAT AS A SOCIETY

WE ARE TERMINALLY

MAD

For example, this week's fertiliser bomb trial had heard that the key plotters had been radicalised by the hate preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed whom the judge condemned as

'a master of cowardice -who works in the shadows.'

This was the same firebrand who as an asylum -seeker here, had pocketed

Ł275,000

-in Welfare benefits.

[It is the same mentality shown by

Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer and many others

-who instead of spending the Ł32 million allocated for building prisons a few years ago are now doing almost anything in order to keep thousands of criminals many repeat offenders and dangerous, out of prison and giving many early release so they can go back to torment their victims and as has happened in a number of occasions returned to have another go at their robbery or other offence knowing that the worst that might happen is either a holiday or community service or whatever  and as many prisons these days are very much like 5star hotels there will be no hardship encountered if they are so lucky to win the prison admission lottery -then it will be a nice break to see old friends and anyway they will be out before they have completed their degree in political science or whatever.

The victims of crime, many of them elderly - poor and lonely won't as a rule be free of fear of their tormentor returning for a second or even third try to rob them of the little they have  and as has happened even assault and kill the defenceless pensioner - but some victims even lose heart and end their own lives by depriving themselves of food because they have lost hope that they can be safe again and we have their so-called protectors such as The Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer the new 'Justice' Minister ? who says 'Jail's the wrong place for burglars' and others who are doing whatever they can to keep the criminals out of jail. If the Army can put up a temporary  barracks in double quick time then there would be spaces for all the thousands of criminals who should be

OUT OF THE COMMUNITY.

Of course there would be complaints that the conditions are not up to the standards of the 5star prisons that they have 'visited' over the years and anyway there is

Tony Blair's

1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

to keep them out of such uncomfortable surroundings which would not provide the 'key' service which has been introduced with their friendly solicitor providing a drugs service as an extra comfort.

THERE IS NO LONGER JUSTICE AS THE SENTENCE DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME

ANYMORE.]

*

To continue:

Despite all this, I still believe there are grounds for hope - largely because Muslim hotheads have overplayed their hand by blowing people up, rioting in their neighbourhoods or broadcasting hate -filled speeches which alienate them from the host community.

*

 

[Well we are of the opinion that until the Government shows to the Muslim population that they will not give way on insisting that ALL newcomers and those already with us conform to

OUR RULE OF LAW

 

-and punish without hesitation any breaches of the Law and make it plain that anyone who is a threat to our country WILL BE extradited. BUT of course we have Tony Blair's 1998 Human Rights Act and articles within the 1951 British led Convention of Human Rights which will need amending.

It should be made quite clear that those who have no intention to

INTEGRATE

-should be reminded of their commitment which they gave when they where granted immigration or asylum status (which should be a legal requirement in the future)

Unless drastic action is taken by the next Prime Minister as a priority , future generations of the indigenous population will find themselves foreigners in their own country with their religion and culture under growing  threat. The evidence is before our eyes it is a warning of what the future will bring if action is not taken

QUICKLY AND DECISIVELY

Those moderate Muslims will at last feel secure in the knowledge that they are safe from the extremist influence which up to now they have had it all their own way. By our commitment

IT WILL BE SECURITY THROUGH STRENGTH OF PURPOSE AND THE MUSLIMS WILL BE WITH US

Continue as NOW and they will have nothing but contempt for our indecision and inadequate moral integrity.]

*

To continue:

The sharp-suited, soft spoken undercover agents of the

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

-the banned Egyptian group whose former members include Osma Bin Laden -understand that power is best secured by

STEALTH

by infiltrating institutions and seducing the

MEDIA

Libya's Colonel Gaddafi once exemplified this policy

He said:

'There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe -without swords, without guns-without conquests. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.'

 

[AND THEY SURE MEAN IT]

 

 

[Our survival as a Christian nation can only be achieved by the Government reversing it's abhorrent legislation as to Religious freedom of speech and action because not to do so further emphasises to the extremist elements in our country that we are WEAK and AMORAL nation and therefore ready for conversion by stealth as their numbers obtain the victory while we ignore our Christian past at our peril.

Our close relations to America must be strengthened particularly in the moral arena so that our nations will gain the grudging respect of those who have a desire to replace our Christian heritage with their own.

There will be many who will say that we live in a secular environment and that the Government of the day should not concern itself but we have no choice we either support our Institutions and that includes our Christian inheritance which is ingrained into the very fabric of our nation or  lose that priceless heirloom the foundation of our IDENTITY and accept another more fanatical regime who do not believe in toleration but only in the observance of their one and only deliverer who will have no other faiths before it.

WE HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE

-because a vacuum must be filled and it is better that we know what contain.

The Choice Is Yours!

-but better it will be to retain our own heritage than be converted to another.]

*

But the violent extremists have provoked some signs of a backlash, not just among indigenous populations of Europe but among those tolerant immigrants who value the countries

THAT TOOK THEM IN

The Swedes, of all people, whom liberals claimed had produced a perfect society, are trying to row back on the

WELFARE STATE

-to encourage the

WORK ETHIC

and are demanding

THAT IMMIGRANTS INTEGRATE

 

Nyamko Sabuni a female, Muslim, African immigrant who is now the country's

INTEGRATION and EQUALITY

MINISTER

-insists that

ALL IMMIGRANTS

-should learn Swedish and find a job.

 

She is also intent on criminalising

FORCED MARRIAGES

CHECKING GIRLS FOR EVIDENCE OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION

and

BANNING THE VEIL

as well as

STATE FUNDING

for RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.

[This is an area that needs the new Premier Gordon Brown to put his attention as to make it plain that their is one

RULE OF LAW

in

ENGLAND

[NO EXCEPTIONS FOR MUSLIMS OR ANYONE ELSE IN OUR COUNTRY]

 

 

*          *          *

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

H.F.1294

 
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 16

AUGUST 2005

ISLAMIC AMBITION

In his 1934 book 'Sex and Culture the anthropologist J.D.Unwin studied 86 different cultures from a period of 5,000 years and concluded that chastity and fidelity in "strict marital monogamy" were central to any strong, healthy society. Indeed, no society flourished for more than three generations without it. Britain is now nearing the end of the second generation. Once the third generation was out, the society died, usually by being taken over by another, monogamous people. "I know of no exceptions to this rule.

Could the fiercely monogamous Islam be the culture that takes over from the secular humanist culture of the Western world? Will we see  the establishment of an Islamic State in Britain and the imposition of Sha'ria. This author believes the British Establishment would not  allow such a thing to happen, jealous  as its leaders are of their grip on power.  However, events have a habit  of taking politicians by surprise, and there is no lack  of ambition amongst Muslims.  It is only necessary to look at tower hamlets  to see what happens when 'ordinary Muslims' take power.

Tower Hamlets [in 2005] is 36% Muslim, and yet Muslims are in a majority in the ruling Labour group and on the Council as a whole, and the Mayor is Muslim.  Presumably the Muslim councillors can be regarded as 'ordinary Muslims.' Once in power, they attempted to have  wards renamed to eliminate references to Christianity (Trinity ward disappeared ), and a proposal to twin the London Borough with Jenin, a Palestinian hot-bed of terrorism, was narrowly averted.

The Borough is able to use the funding it allocates to advance Islamic programmes and cultural societies, force the closure of Christian schools and ensure that Muslims control everything for which the local authority has responsibility.

There are 14 Muslim community organisations in partnership with Tower Hamlets Borough Council. In addition to the 2 mosques, the Ahmadiya Muslim Association has as its purpose:

Practising Islamic knowledge... to upkeep a moral society', the junior Muslim Circle provided' religious education' to 8-14 year olds, a Madrassah has 'mother tongue [Arabic?] and study support classes', and the Shahjalal Centre is there  to 'meet the needs of the Muslim community' with 'prayer space' and 'education for children'

Couple Islamic ambition for a Khilafah with a decadent British society whose leaders dare not speak out against Islam or oppose 'multiculturalism', and Islamic advances can be made.  Mosques can be built and expanded, Islamic schools established, cultural centres set up, and large amounts of public money can fund studies which do not benefit the United Kingdom..

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/16

 

A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

THE TRUTH that BRUSSELS cannot BEAR:

PEOPLE CRAVE NATIONAL IDENTITY.

What happened in Catalonia on Sunday was shaming and shocking in a modern European state. Spanish police bludgeoned and assaulted defenceless civilians who were simply trying to exercise their democratic right.

First and foremost, this is a terrible crisis for the wrong-headed, bully-boy government in Madrid. After the unedifying spectacle of police attacking blameless voters, the chances must surely have increased of Catalonia – Spain’s most prosperous region with some 7.5million inhabitants – seceding.

But it is also an enormous crisis for the European Union, which in recent weeks has said almost nothing as the Spanish authorities arrested officials arranging an independence referendum on behalf of the devolved Catalan government.

 

 

 

One reason he did not do so in the case of Spain is that it is one of the most obedient pro-EU countries in Europe, which seldom defies the will of Brussels, or causes trouble for Juncker and his ilk.

But there is an even deeper reason for the Commission’s silence. The events in Catalonia challenge at a deep level its project for ever closer union, about which both Juncker and President Emmanuel Macron of France have ventilated in recent weeks.

For how can there be an amicable union between the EU’s nation states if some of those nations are themselves deeply divided and fractious, as is plainly the case with Catalonia and Spain?

Here is a region of largely Catalan-speaking people who regard themselves as culturally distinct. A sizeable proportion of them yearn to break free from Spain, even though Catalonia has been part of the country for hundreds of years.

Sunday’s vote illuminates a truth which Brussels cannot bear. There are many people in Europe for whom the atavistic call of identity counts far more than any exhortation about forging a European superstate

That, after all, was one of the main messages of Brexit – that the majority of voters in our own ancient nation resent the undemocratic control of Brussels, and have no wish to be sucked into a united Europe.

For Brussels, the example of Britain was bad enough, and it has set about trying to punish us for having had the effrontery to want to leave. In a sense, the demonstration of Catalan nationalism is even more alarming to the federalists because this show of independence is happening inside one of the EU’s nation states.

How is it possible, they wonder, for the pan-European project to proceed if some EU countries are in danger of fracturing? The terror in Brussels is that if Catalonia were allowed to break away, regions in other member states could follow suit. Instead of coalescing into an amorphous whole, some EU nations might fall apart.

Belgium, whose capital, Brussels, is the seat of EU expansionism, is divided. The Flemish-speaking region of Flanders, which constitutes about 60 per cent of the country’s population, is at daggers drawn with the French-speaking minority.

Many people in northern Italy long to be rid of the impoverished south, which is relatively unproductive and, in the view of northerners, consumes more than its fair share of government spending. The Right-wing Northern League has campaigned with some success for independence for the north, and imagines a separate country called Padania.

France faces an independence movement in the island of Corsica. Meanwhile the cohesion of Spain is threatened not just by free-spirited Catalans but also by militant Basques, part of whose territory lies in France.

Romania and Slovakia both have unhappy Hungarian minorities. Even in Poland’s region of Silesia, much of which used to be ruled by Germany until 1945, there are stirrings of an independence movement.

All over Europe apparently unified countries are harried by breakaway groups which have a strong sense of separate identity. If Catalonia were allowed to go it alone, who knows what might come next?


 

The problem for Brussels is that it is used to dealing with individual nation states but is powerless to intervene in unruly regions. That is why the Commission has remained so quiet in the case of Catalonia apart from expressing a few words of solidarity with Spain.

By the way, the British response has been regrettably supine. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson stressed his support for the Spanish government in a tweet. As the leading Brexiteer he should surely have been more critical of Madrid’s use of violence.

The Spanish government, it must be said, has behaved rashly and brutishly. Arguably some Catalan separatist political parties have been unwise in deliberately engineering a confrontation.

But given that the Catalan government had made numerous requests to hold a referendum on independence – after Spain’s constitutional court had controversially declared in 2010 that Catalonia was not a nation – what was it to do having been rebuffed time and time again? If it had possessed a modicum of good sense, the Spanish government would have allowed the referendum to go ahead. Had the vote been in favour of independence, it could have then questioned its legal status.

But to arrest Catalan officials, to close a large number of polling stations, and then to clobber innocent voters were acts of unbelievable stupidity as well as nastiness.

It passes understanding how the prime minister of Spain, Mariano Rajoy, can say that democracy has prevailed. The opposite is true.

Imagine if two or three years hence the Scottish National Party’s Nicola Sturgeon were to hold a referendum without the approval of Westminster – by no means an unthinkable eventuality.

In fact, her case would be much weaker than that of the Catalan government since there has already been one legal referendum in Scotland in 2014, which was said by the SNP leader Alex Salmond at the time to be the last for a generation.

Even so, it is inconceivable that a new unofficial referendum in Scotland would be met by the authorities in Westminster with police wielding batons and firing rubber bullets. Such a wild over-reaction would inevitably give a boost to Scottish nationalism – as, I have no doubt, the cause of Catalan nationalism will have benefited from Sunday’s onslaught.

The truth is that the Spanish state has a very restricted conception of democracy. We should know that already from its desire to shoehorn Gibraltar into Spain despite 99 per cent of its citizens having voted in a 2002 referendum to remain British.

God alone knows what will happen now in Catalonia. Unless the Spanish government agrees to an official referendum – an unlikely prospect – there will probably be deadlock. I am afraid there is also the possibility of more violence on both sides.

Justifying and supporting the Madrid government is the European Commission in all its absurdity, dreaming dreams of a union which the people of Europe do not want. It will do its utmost to ensure that Catalonia doesn’t interfere with its grandiose scheme.

Will Remainers look at Catalonia and reflect that we have a quieter and more civilised way of dealing with our differences in this country? I don’t know. What I do know is that every day I am ever more relieved that we are leaving this misguided club.


Full article

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4942684/STEPHEN-GLOVER-truth-national-identity.html#ixzz4uYWX4q7V

Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

 

92

View
comments

 

H.F.1332 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

[ A MATTER OF FACT!]

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

*  *  *

ADDED DECEMBER,2018

[FIND OUT MORE OF YOUR WORLD THAT WILL SHOCK

YOU.]

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 5-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 6-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2019

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-PAGE 2-2019

 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012