AFGHANISTAN THE ROAD TO RUIN AND DEATH FOR THE BRITISH
ARMY.
*
Don’t allow slow death of our proud Army
by
Andrew Alexander
Column
*
DAILY MAIL
Friday June 9, 2006.
DO YOU remember the 1980 Olympic Games? Probably not. But
they were a major political event because the U.S. called for a boycott of the
Great Moscow event - which 59 other countries followed, but not us, I am glad
to say.
The protest arose because
the Soviet Union had - Oh, the horror of it!
- sent troops into Afghanistan. Such wickedness could not be forgiven.
The Russians offered the
excuse that their intervention had been asked for by the Afghan president (that
rings a bell somewhere?). But of course, such feeble justification was not
going to be accepted by the U.S. and its best friends. Vietnam, did I hear you
say? Oh well, that was different.
In the event, the Soviet
Afghanistan intervention was such a failure and so unpopular among Russians
that it made a major contribution to the collapse of Communism.
In the pot-and-kettle context,
I was looking recently at some of the exchanges during the Big Three meetings
in 1945 to plan a brave new world. The U.S. and Britain were insisting that
there should be proper elections in Eastern Europe. An interesting view said
Molotov, and the Soviet Foreign Minister asked what were we planning to do
about Franco’s Spain.
But Spain was a major
British trading partner, was Churchill’s rather weak retort. Whether Molotov produced one of his icy
smiles at that point is not recorded.
British and American
protests about Soviet behaviour in Eastern Europe were also met by Molotov’s
comments about human rights being violated in Greece - where Britain was aiding
the Greek Right and against the Greek Left.
Our side insisted that such
a claim was a complete distortion of the truth. Were could he have got such
information from? The British Press, responded Molotov.
But we must not stray too
far from Afghanistan, which is where disaster now lies. A British military
contingent about the size of the police force of Wales is expected to control
an area of similar size. To do so when hostility comes only from local warlords
would be difficult enough.
With the expectation that
the region will draw in Muslim fanatics from other countries, it is hopeless.
The country is made for guerrilla warfare with its mountains, caves, ravines
and primitive roads.
As the casualties start to
mount -as they will
the public, already
disillusioned about IRAQ, will want us to disengage. As we must. For we may
face the slow death of the BRITISH ARMY
-one of the few institutions
these days, which commands national and international admiration.
Iraq has been a brutal
wound. Afghanistan could be mortal. Recruitment figures are liable to collapse.
But do not look to the
Official Opposition for help. Already discredited by support for the Iraq war,
the Tory Front Bench offers supine support for the
GOVERNMENT.
Shadow Foreign Secretary
William Hague, normally a sensible man, prates about our ‘building’ a country
alongside the Americans.
Shadow Defence Secretary
Liam Fox talks of the ‘construction of a free and democratic Afghanistan’. [Well in England in
particular many people would be appreciative if that was true in their country]
But the
first instinct of the Afghans must be that they should not be ruled or
controlled by foreigners. [Well as the Press and Media have aired recently we have the same
problem in England].
Fox adds sonorously that:
‘We cannot fail to act and we cannot act and fail’ (I am
working on that.)
One wonders if the
politicians have the slightest understanding of that country, its people or its
tribal rivalries. Even the writ of the elected president does not run far
outside Kabul and not much there.
A riot in the city a week
ago, after an accident involving an American vehicle, left eight dead and 100
injured. It could be more than that, agitators proclaim to a population all too
ready to believe the worst.
The Tories believe it is
their duty at all times to stand by our armed forces whatever the conflict. This
is ludicrously short-sighted.
If they want to support the
Army, they should resist it being given impossible tasks.
*
Late News!
*
Troops in Afghanistan
Face ‘human shields’
*
Daily Mail Reporter
Tuesday, June 20-2006.
British soldiers taking part in the biggest coalition
offensive in Afghanistan told yesterday how the Taliban fighters had used women
and children as ‘human shields.
[NOW! Mr Blair you know what
our troops will have to contend with and no doubt a number of lawyers in the UK
will be hoping our lads will be on the road to the Old Bailey.]
Paratroopers revealed how
they had to give pursuit of insurgents after coming under fire. Corporal
Quinton Poll, a 29-year-old section commander with A Company of 3 Para, said:
‘I
followed the gunman into a house and he started pushing women and children towards me.’
‘We know who we’re dealing
with. But when you find out they are using human shields, you are just
surprised.’
The troops came under fire
as they arrived by helicopter in the remote mountain town of Nowzad as part of
the U.S led Operation Mountain thrust, the biggest drive against militants
since the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.
The 11,000-strong coalition
force of American, British, Canadian and Afghan troops have killed nearly 100
Taliban in recent days. But yesterday Taliban units retaliated, killing more
than 30 civilians and abducting a dozen more. The firefight, which took place
earlier this month, was part of the first major battle British troops faced
since moving to southern Afghanistan this year.
Details of the fight are
only now becoming public after troops involved met reporters at a British base
in Helmand province.
Lieutenant Colonel Stuart
Tootal, the British battle group commander, sad his troops were ambushed by more
than 50 Taliban operating in small groups. More than 20 Taliban were killed,
while British forces sustained only minor injuries [?]
He said the outcome of
battles such as the clash at Nowzad could determine the success of a new Nato
force now taking over security for southern Afghanistan.
‘I’d like to think it sent a
message to the Taliban that they might want to think twice about attacking us
again,’ he said.
But the commander insisted that winning hearts and minds
was paramount.
He said:
‘If every day we could go
out and improve the lot of the Afghan people, that would have a far greater
effect than killing Taliban’
*
[Well he would have to say
that for morale but the fact is they were taken in an ambush, which the terrain
easily facilitates, and it will happen on a regular basis because the Taliban
are the defenders of their own territory and the Afghan people are no different
to any other people in wanting the invader to leave THEIR COUNTRY.
The only result that will be
accomplished will be a regular flight of body bags to the UK and the injured - many for life - and the distress of their families
and friends.]
To Continue:
Canadian and Dutch troops
will be taking over neighbouring provinces, which are under U.S.command until
NATO takes over next month. The Nowzad
battle gives a sense of the unpredictable threat the NATO troops will face in
what the alliance says is a tough mission
The past few weeks have seen
British forces move into areas in the high mountains of Helmand province that
have seen no outside military presence for decades.
It is a wild country where
the Taliban, who governed until the U.S.-led strikes in 2001, have been making
a violent comeback against a new governor and the Western-backed government in Kabul.
* * *
[Font altered-bolding & underling
used-comments in brackets]
JUNE/06
*
*
*
| |
|
|
| |
CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!
A
BLUNT REPLY TO THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th DECEMBER ,2007.
*
TIME FOR DECISION
THE BRITISH
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.
*
The Act of Settlement of
1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!
*
The Common Law of ENGLAND
is the LAW of
THE COMMONWEALTH and
AMERICA
*
The Commonwealth Realms V
The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS
*
MESSAGE FROM
AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
*
THANK GOD WE ELECTED
A MONARCH
(by the Late -William Rees-Mogg-Independent
Peer)
*
Previous Speaker of
the House of Commons (1976-83) says:
'WE MUST NOT SURRENDER
OUR SOVEREIGNTY INTO FOREIGN HANDS.'
*
WHY WE MUST BE ALERT AND
WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY
*
IF WE DESTROY OUR
RIGHT OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT A WAR ON TERROR-WHO WINS?
(John Mortimer)
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS
QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE
LAST
IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE
YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
OR
WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT
OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE
WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD
BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF
OUR PROTECTOR OF THE
'Rights
and Liberties'
of
Englishmen
Will keep by HER SACRED OATH
or the MONARCHY be nothing more
than a THEME PARK in the future
THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS
THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.
We are told on
the BBC (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the
23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage
of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
Well! as far as many patriotic
subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns
the protection of our
FREEDOM and COUNTRY.
Change we have had and will continue
to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of
England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and
Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC as happened in the
17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very
'Rights
and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in
the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of
PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's
INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the above publicity exercise is to be used to
soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a
Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and
RELIGION.
WE ASK WHAT
PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?
THEY ARE
PRICELESS!
*
*
The Choice is Yours!-but time is
running out FAST!
6 months to be EXACT!
*
THE EU
WE-AND
THEM!
WE are
to join THEM
THEY are
not joining US
WE have more to LOSE
THEY have
more to GAIN
WE have been clear of
dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY
THEY have
been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!
*
Our Queen and the EU
Constitution
*
The Spirit of England
by
Winston Churchill
*
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
*
MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH
THE II
*
We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT
on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic
fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year
reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and
the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR
CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.
As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel
LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE
GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost
achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER.
The reason for the marked drop in the
number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people
have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their
WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while
Rome burned'
Is
it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch talks our Rights
and Liberties are being taken from us under our very noses?
Of
course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and
Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to
be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the
MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.
We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who
is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES ask at this late
stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some
veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE
at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter
should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for
their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.
IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been
pre-recorded we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects
some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
Should
this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is
after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and
therefore nothing more than a
THEME PARK
*
Hear Tony Benn's comments about the
despotic and corrupt
EUROPEAN UNION
and the need for a
REFERENDUM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
From a politician with INTEGRITY and
love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the
monstrous creature soon to be a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
*
Liberties of Parliament-
Birthright of Subjects of England.
*
[All
words/word underlined have a separate bulletin]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
A
CHRISTMAS MESSAGE
TO
ALL OUR VIEWERS.
WE WISH YOU ALL A
HAPPY
CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR
IN
2008
[Since our Xmas message to you all last
year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added
emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors
in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN
POWER]
We Remember The Year 2006
The Spirit
of England-Winston Churchill-1953
[We were warned in 1953 to
beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken
Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds
they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predessessor
Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final
signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000
year PROTECTOR of our inherited
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of
ENGLISHMEN
HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN
Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred
'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897
'We still leave it to the work of
Alfred the Great
that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state
which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has
already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and
fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final
signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless
police state to call itself a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE
It is within the power of Her
Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever
lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now
clear for ALL TO SEE.
In the Netherlands a number of years
ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put
before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over
1200 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS
which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the
Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE
DEPEND.
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN
*
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS
QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST
IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
*
A
WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND
by
Harry Beckhough
[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]
2004
*
'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'
-NOT
any MORE
|
| |
|
|
| |
THE EU OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL
PORTRAY ITSELF AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD
'Don't tell the voters-or you will ruin everything '
"...we have to make sure that there are no discussions
taking place in the open air"
Guenter Burghardt, a former EU
ambassador to the US, warning that details of the new EU diplomatic
service (officially to be known as the External Action Service) should
not be discussed in public before the
UK PARLIAMENT
had ratified the NEW EU TREATY
and Ireland has held its TREATY REFERENDUM early next
summer (source: EU Observer on 27th November ,2007
The EU
has also stated that none of its institutions should rock the boat until
the English have ratified their TREATY.
Over the
next few months you will hear more than ever the wonderful benefits of
the EU. Whether it is Global warming or whatever they feel shows them in
a good light and when you have swallowed the bait you will not know what
has hit you. They intend to show how reasonable they are and that they
are there to make you happy. If you all fall for this con-trick then you
will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store for
YOU!
Referendum: how Labour could
still smell of roses.
and
'Money
to spare'
when we
leave the EU in 2008?
Open Europe
says:
-
Build 40 brand new general hospitals each year 2007-13
or
- Cut council tax by nearly 50 per cent
or
- Cut the basic rate of income tax by 3p
or
Cut petrol duty by 75 per cent
or
Pay the total bill for the London Olympics in
less than a year
AND MUCH MORE
Commons debate on the European Communities
(Finance) Bill on Monday 19th November,2007.
REFERENDUM DAY
will be
RECOMPENCE DAY?
*
A TIME FOR
EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING
VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.
|
|