ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC

PARTY ORG.UK.

BULLETINS & VIEWERS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

Est 1994- Policies-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-Top Topics and Stats

PART  ONE -1994 -Official Website-2015 - PART 3

NEW PART TWO

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 

AUGUST-PART ONE-2015

 

PLEASE NOTE:  IN ORDER TO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION EACH MONTH WE HAVE REVERTED TO A PART TWO.  HOWEVER CERTAIN ITEMS WILL APPEAR IN BOTH

 

PART ONE

 

AND PART TWO

 SINCE 2003 WE HAVE INTRODUCED OVER 2000 BULLETINS THE MAJORITY ABOUT THE NAZI-PLANNED EU. -THE GREATER PART OF THIS INFORMATION HAS COME FROM THE DAILY MAIL

 AND FROM OTHER SOURCES PARTICULARLY FROM THE MANY EUROSCEPTIC LINKS ON THE INTERNET.

 

*

IMPORTANT NOTICE

( 1 SEPTEMBER-2015)

 

BECAUSE OF SUDDEN TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WE ARE EXPERIENCING WE HAVE DECIDED TO SAVE IN ADVANCE A MONTHLY BULLETIN WHICH  WE SHALL ENDEAVOUR  TO  UPDATE EACH MONTH.  THIS WILL ENSURE THAT WE HAVE REMAINED AT OUR POST UNTIL THE

TRUE PATRIOTIC PEOPLE OF

ENGLAND

 

 

HAVE SPOKEN!

 

[SHOULD WE BE REDUCED TO ONLY MINOR STATEMENTS THEN WE SHALL UPDATE THE NUMBERED ARTICLE AT THE FOOT OF THIS PAGE

 

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

 

1 SEPTEMBER-2015

 

 

 

 

LEADERSHIP

 OF THE

OUT-OF-EU

MOVEMENT.

 

 

WE HAVE BEEN FOR YEARS CALLING FOR A

 

 

 

UNITED OUT-OF-THE -EU MOVEMENT

 HEADED BY A  FORTHRIGHT AND

 

PATRIOTIC GENERAL...

 

TO INSTIL DISCIPLINE AND ORDER TO ENSURE THE CORRECT MESSAGE IS FOLLOWED BY ALL CONCERNED.

 

WE CERTAINLY DO NOT BELIEVE THAT A SUITABLE LEADER IS ONE WHO SAYS HE WILL RESIGN IF HE DOES NOT ACHIEVE HIS OBJECTIVE AS THE MAN WITH 20 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN THE CITY OF LONDON. AND THE LATEST REVELATIONS REVEALING THAT THE CON PARTY HAVE BEEN THE UNSEEN HAND DIRECTING UKIP POLICY IN ORDER TO ENSURE THEY NEVER SUCCEED IN THEIR PATRIOTIC  PURPOSE  WHICH WE HAVE SUSPECTED FOR MANY A YEAR.

 

THE CORRECT ATTITUDE TO WHAT MUST BE THE GREATEST QUESTION IN THE LIFE OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE AND THOSE OF OTHER LOVERS OF FREEDOM WHO HAVE INFUSED OUR NATION STATE OVER A THOUSAND YEARS AND  THE INSPIRATION OF OUR GREAT WAR LEADERS SUCH AS WILLIAM PITT-LORD CHATHAM WHO STATED IN  NOVEMBER 1777:

 

'If I were an American, as I am an Englishman, while a foreign troop was landed in my country, I never would lay down my arms-never-never-never!

 

HIS SON WILLIAM PITT THE YOUNGER ALSO PRIME MINISTER STATED IN NOVEMBER 1805 AFTER

NELSON'S

GREAT NAVAL VICTORY AT TRAFALGAR

 

 

WHICH SAVED ENGLAND  AND EUROPE FROM ANOTHER DICTATOR WHO WISHED FOR A

EUROPEAN UNION AND AGAIN ENGLAND AFTER TWO WORLD WARS IN THE 20TH CENTURY FIGHTING THE SAME FOE IN THE 21ST CENTURY ALBEIT NOT ON A BLOODY BATTLEFIELD WE ARE ,NON-THE-LESS, FIGHTING A BATTLE FOR THE SAME REASON TO PRESERVE OUR INHERITED AND WELL- ESTABLISHED RIGHT TO REGAIN OUR FREEDOM WITHIN OUR ACCUSTOMED FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

THE TASK  BEFORE HER IN OUR OWN TIME  IS TO ENSURE AN ENGLISH EXIT FROM THE NAZI-PLANNED COLLECTIVIST AND UNDEMOCRATIC EU TO ENABLE US ALL TO AGREE THAT:

 

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust , save  Europe.'

 

*

 

IN OUR OWN TIME THOSE WHO WITNESSED THE HEROIC ACTION OF THE

'FEW'

AND THE GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL WHO EMBODIED THE TRUE FEELINGS OF THE PEOPLE TO REMAIN A FREE PEOPLE IN A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE AND HIS MEMORABLE WORDS WHEN WE FACED AN INVASION  FROM THE VERY SAME ARCHITECTS OF THE NAZI -PLANNED COLLECTIVIST -UNDEMOCRATIC EU

 

'We shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing -grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.'-

Winston Churchill ( June -1940)

 

WE WON THE WAR BUT WE LATER LOST THE PEACE IN 1972 WHEN PARLIAMENT IN THE HANDS OF THE CON PARTY VOTED TO JOIN WHAT WAS  A

 

'BIG LIE'

 

AND MOST OF YOU WILL KNOW WHAT HITLER ADMIRED

 ABOUT THIS NATURAL ONE-UPMANSHIP OVER DOZY UNINTERESTED CITIZENS WHO CAN'T

 

'SEE THE WOOD FOR THE TREES'

 

OR

IN PLAIN LANGUAGE ACCEPTED THE PARTY BRIBES RATHER THAN DEFEND THEIR WORLD ACCLAIMED CONSTITUTION

 of the

"RIGHTS of ENGLISHMAN".

 

*

 

SINCE THEN THERE HAVE BEEN MANY WARNINGS FROM ACROSS OUR SOCIETY WHO HAVE WARNED ABOUT THE DIRE CONSEQUENCES OF BEING WITHIN THE SO-CALLED EEC BUT REALLY THE 'CLOSER UNION'  A POLITICAL EU. ONE OF THE MOST ARDENT CRITICS WAS THE LABOUR PEER LORD (PETER) SHAW WHO STATED HIS VIEW IN:

 

'Almost everything, which is most precious in our Civilisation has come from small States.'

 

ALSO

 

EMPIRES HAVE GONE AND MOST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD NOW LIVE IN [ INDEPENDENT ] NATION STATES

 

*

 

A Speaker of the House of Commons no less has added his  fears to the loss of

 

'NATIONHOOD'

 

*

 

A Greek scholar

and eurosceptic politician BRAVELY forewarned of the dangerous demographic changes that would occur in the future-

BUT FEW WOULD

 LISTEN.

 

*

IT TOOK

General De Gaulle in 1960

 LEADER OF A CLOSE WAR ALLY IN TWO WORLD WARS TO FULLY APPRECIATE WHY ENGLAND COULD NOT  EMBRACE THE EU

 

 

*

 

We have Harold Wilson in 1961

-To consider the Common market in simple black and white terms?

*

And among the millions of patriots who have been fighting  for decades in their own way we mention a

 'FEW'

such as those great patriots no longer with us

BUT THEIR INSPIRATION AND WORKS WILL NEVER DIE WHILE THERE IS AN

ENGLAND

 

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 

AND

 

 ROSS and NORRIS McWHIRTER

 

defenders of the

 

ENGLISH CONSTITUTUION

 

 

 

 

POLICY

 

  THERE NEEDS TO BE A CONCERTED AND COMBINED APPROACH WITH A MESSAGE WHICH EMBRACES ALL VIEWS AS THE WEAKEST BUT MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IS BUTTRESSED IN DEBATE WITH OTHERS OF AN ECONOMICAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC NATURE. AS A  PATRIOT AND  A DONOR TO THE CAUSE OF A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

 

 

WITH THE

 

'WORLD ITS OYSTER'

 

 

AS WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AND PROVED BY OUR PEOPLE -A GERMANIC TRIBE

THAT LOVED

 INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM AND UNITY

 SINCE THEY LANDED IN A LAND, LATER TO BE NAMED ENGLAND

 

*

OF COURSE THERE ARE MANY PATRIOTS TODAY WHO ARE FIGHTING THE GOOD FIGHT WITH WORDS AND TRUTH AND MANY ALSO WITH

ACTION!  

THE LIST OF NAMES WOULD BE TOO LONG EVEN FOR THE SPACE AVAILABLE. BUT OUR WORK IS GREATLY HELPED BY THOSE WE  MENTION BELOW-AND A VIEW OF OUR OVER 2000 BULLETINS SINCE 2003 WILL SHOW MANY MANY OTHERS:

 

V

 

ROLE OF HONOUR

 

VERNON COLEMAN

 

DAVID  BROWN

 

HARRY BECKHOUGH

 

BERNARD CONNOLLY

 

RODNEY ATKINSON

 

 

EDWARD HEATHCOAT AMORY

 

 

AND MANY MANY OTHERS.   

 

( T B C)

 

 

 

 

AND MANY CORRESPONDENTS AND WRITERS FROM ARTICLES-BOOKS AND NEWSPAPERS PARTICULARLY THE

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

 

 

ENGLAND

IS ALREADY SECOND ONLY TO HOLLAND AS THE MOST CROWDED COUNTRY IN EUROPE

(JUNE 2006)

ONLY CHANGE IN 2015 IS THAT

 ENGLAND

IS NOW

MUCH MORE CROWDED.

 

*

 

AS EXPECTED DAVID CAMERON IS TRYING TO REPEAT THE UNDEMOCRATIC TACTICS USED IN THE 1975 REFERENDUM AND BY HIS FRIENDS IN THE  HIERARCHY OF UNDEMOCRATIC EU.  

BUT THIS TIME HIS OPPONENTS ARE NOW MORE ALERT!

TO THE USUAL GROSS LIES AND DECEIT.

 

 

[1SEPTEMBER 2015 ]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

 

'WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.'

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

 

[THE PROOF OF THIS STATEMENT IN 2015 IS SHOWN IN MANY TOWNS AND CITIES IN OUR ONCE FAMILIAR COUNTRY BEFORE THE EU AND MASS IMMIGRATION FROM

FOREIGN CULTURES LEADING TO FOREIGN+ENCLAVES

WILL UNLESS FIRM DECISIVE ACTION IS TAKEN NOW! TO A FOREIGN TAKEOVER OF OUR COUNTRY WITHIN A FEW GENERATIONS.]

 

ENGLAND

The present must be balanced on the wings of the past and the future, and that as you stretch out the one you stretch out the other to strength.'  Wordsworth

*

Smile at us, pay us, pass us; but do not quite forget,/For we are the (true) people of England, that have never spoken yet.

[the indigenous people.]

[The Secret People-G . K. Chesterton-1874-1936]

*

With David Cameron in mind after his comment that he will not seek another term:

-'The  last temptation is the greatest treason: to do the right deed [partially] for the wrong reason.'

T. S .Elliot

*

 
  1. [A WARNING!

  2.  

  3. YOU HAVE IGNORED

  4. FOR DECADES.]

  5. *

  6. Daily Mail

  7. Number of migrants

     

     entering Britain breaks all records in

     

    UK

      

    PASSES 8 MILLION...

     

    ONE-IN-EIGHT-OF-POPULATION-

     

    BORN-OVERSEAS

     

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

'The present must be balanced on the wings of the past and the future, and that as you stretch out the one you stretch out the other to strength.' 

 

Wordsworth

 

*

Freedom!

 

'Freedom is for the free-minded who will fight.'

 

'Slavery is for the senseless-minded who enjoy their serfdom.'

 

Anon.

 

*

 

'Many try ,few succeed, to give good thoughts its power to produce good deeds to bring Mankind to its ultimate purpose, the  perfection of Goodness ,within the heavenly heights of the

Universe.'

 

 

 

'WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.'

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

 

[THE PROOF OF THIS STATEMENT IN 2015 IS SHOWN IN MANY TOWNS AND CITIES IN OUR ONCE FAMILIAR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND BEFORE THE EU AND MASS IMMIGRATION FROM

 

FOREIGN CULTURES LEADING TO FOREIGN ENCLAVES

WITH THEIR BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 AND MORE IMMIGRATION FROM MUSLIM COUNTRIES  AND FROM  ELSEWHERE WILL UNLESS FIRM DECISIVE ACTION IS TAKEN NOW! WILL LEAD TO A FOREIGN TAKEOVER OF OUR COUNTRY WITHIN A FEW GENERATIONS . WE HAVE SEEN SOME EXAMPLES ON HOW THEY CAPITALISE ON THEIR CUSTOMARY ELECTION TACTICS ONCE DESCRIBED BY A JUDGE INVESTIGATING ELECTION FRAUD IN A LABOUR CONSTITUENCY IN BIRMINGHAM AND WOULD FIT EVENTS RECENTLY IN

TOWER+HAMLETS

AS AN EXAMPLE OF A

BANANA REPUBLIC.  

 

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

 

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

 

QUIT BRITAIN IF YOU WANT SHARIA LAW SAYS TREVOR PHILLIPS.

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

ENGLISH

Is now a foreign language in London

says

[Terance] Stamp

 

 

As THE dashing star of films such as Billy Budd and Far from the Madding Crowd

Terence Stamp was the symbol of 'Swinging London in the Sixties, but says he now feels like an alien in his country

[As do no doubt millions of people in our once integrated Island home since the great  flood over the past decades of immigration from those  of a generally non-integrating culture. AS we have said so mant times over the years it is all about

NUMBERS!]

 

 

And as Mr Stamp says'

It's very sad how few English people there are in London now.' he tells me art a party in Mayfair, where he lamented what he seems to see as a lack of integration among some immigrants.

 

[Well! we are sure that Mr Stamp must of heard of 'White Flight' which has been in progress for over a decade.]

 

 

He states further' When I grew up in East London everyone seemed to speak English, and now you can barely get by speaking our own language.'

 

Stamp, who enjoyed romances with his Sixties icons, the actress Julie Christie and model Jean Shrimpton, shared a flat with Sir Michael Caine, but is now based in West London.

 

 He comments, ' I don't live in the East any more, but I absolutely love mangoes and so occasionally I go back there to buy these wonderful Alphonso mangoes from the market on Green Street. I'm lucky if I can buy one now at all because no one speaks English.'

It's changed so much in such a short space of time, that God knows what London will be like in another decade or so.'

 

 

In a provocative outburst, the 76-year-old actor, who went on to star in Hollywood  blockbusters including Superman, added:

'You see these mums wandering around with their prams and four out of five have these scarves wrapped around their heads. I feel like its not London any more; [As is the scene in many towns and cities in the country .]

 

 

'[Finally he states:]

'I do think a multicultural society can be a good thing, but when it's at the cost of your own CULTURE and HISTORY, then It's gone too far and it would be very sad if London stopped being predominantly English.'

 

DAILY MAIL-SEBASTIAN SHAKESPEARE-JULY 20, 2015

*

 

[Unfortunately it is Mr Stamp and many others naive acceptance to MULTICULTURALISM though in his case however, he gave the correct reason for its rejection but failed to appreciate that there was no so-called 'goodness' in that most destructive IDEOLOGY which also became clear to the head of the CRE -Trevor Phillips who he himself later confessed that he deeply regretted supporting MULTICULTURALISM because it was not right for BRITAIN.]

 

*

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

 

 

'The present must be balanced on the wings of the past and the future, and that as you stretch out the one you stretch out the other to strength.' 

 

 Wordsworth

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

 

Freedom 

 http://FreedomKeys.com


Keys
a collection of amusing, 
fascinating, insightful, or 
maybe even useful information

   

Professor R. J. Rummel, who keeps track of such things, now estimates that in the 20th century

262,000,000

people were murdered by their own governments.  And all these horrors were perpetrated by collectivist governments for the alleged sake of "the proletariat," the "master race," and especially, "the greater good."

None were done by countries based

on

individualism

 

See:  http://tinyurl.com/RJRummel

[The Zionist led USA with its poodle England has illegally invaded Islamic countries for their own gain with no thought for future consequences.  Those individuals such as George Bush and Tony Blair are WAR CRIMINALS as are those who follow their despicable and illegal actions which must surely one day bring them before the INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT for 'RIGHT JUSTICE' to be delivered for their grievous WAR CRIMES.  But for Parliament's VETO! of David Cameron's attempt to send British Forces into SYRIA he too would have joined the band of war criminals above. The billions spent on illegal wars such as Kosovo and many others in the Arab world could have been used to raise the STANDARD OF LIVING of the PEOPLE instead of making the RICH even RICHER while the rest of the population are struggling to make ends meet.  We believe that we should have efficient ARMED FORCES to PROTECT our ISLAND HOME but NOT! for ILLEGAL excursions around the WORLD.

PARASITES OF THE PUBLIC PURSE

-YOUR HARD-EARNED TAXES.

 

 The PUBLIC PURSE with the growing PUBLIC SECTOR has been and still is being squandered on PUBLIC SERVANTS for far too long. The recent example of MP's receiving a £30,000 payment at the end of their term which can be repeated should the same circumstances arise is a blatant case of

 'ROBBERY of the PUBLIC PURSE'

There have been many examples of CIVIL SERVANTS-PUBLIC OFFICIALS leaving a position with a severance pay only to shortly or even immediately obtain another job with in some examples it appears like a merry-go-round of

GREED!

 to which we are sure the TAXPAYERS are none to happy with many of them finding that they must 'tighten their belts' but for those in PUBLIC SERVICE it can be a LOTTERY WIN on every occasion . The reason why this practice continues is because those making the decisions on such matters are

NOT!

INDEPENDENT PROTECTORS OF THE PUBLIC PURSE]

*

 

REMEMBER !

HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE BEEN FOOLED!

 

[The term'gradualism' fits the  above perfectly.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H F 511

 

 

 

 

[REALITY REBORN!]

 

Voters may love Corbyn's Real Labour

 

JEREMY CORBYN'S progress towards becoming Labour's next leader seems effortless, despite being a bearded Left-winger who say terrified colleagues, is leading his party, Pied Piper-style, towards an electoral wasteland.

Now an emboldened Corbyn raises an almost -forgotten Labour ghost, saying the party' shouldn't shy away' from public investment in industry.

The 'common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange' -once Clause IV of the party's constitution- was ditched 20 years ago under Tony Blair.

'New Labour' MPs see Corbyn as an Old Labour loser. But isn't he closer to the soul of the party than the de-caffeinated Conservatives who describe themselves as New Labour?

The Tory-wooing Blair approach won three general elections for New Labour, but its 'neither-fish-nor-fowl' phoniness was found out in the end.

If Corbyn wins the Labour leadership, think some Tories, happy days thereafter will never cease.

THEY SHOULD THINK AGAIN

There's public anger, even among those who do not vote LABOUR, about how we are fleeced by

BANKS, cheated by BIG BUSINESS and ruled by POLITICIANS who-whatever their party-seem to attract

 BIG MONEY sponsorship.

Might back-to-the-future Corbyn be a sign that new generations of voters who never heard of

CLAUSE IV

ARE READY TO GIVE LABOUR A CHANGE

*

Peter McKay for the Daily Mail | Daily Mail Online

 

DAILY MAIL, Monday, August 10,2015

 

  1. [As usual an excellent and far-reaching understanding of the real events taking place at the present time . We fully endorse his views as we have been saying for years that the so-called CON PARTY are not TRUE CONSERVATIVES and the so-called LABOUR PARTY  lost its true roots for over 65 years.

    Over 20 years ago we read about a great learned author and  Labourite of his time

     G. D .Cole.

    We were so impressed with so much of his work that we decided to put a bulletin on our website on the subject of England retaining  its FREEDOM in World Affairs.]

 

[HIGHLIGHTING-CAPS-COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.521

 

 

 

YOU HAVE BEEN AND ARE STILL SO-CALLED GOVERNED BY

IDIOTS!

DAILY MAIL

Monday, August 10,2015

-How I signed up for five years free medical treatment in Hungary-at your expense

-Ani Horvath
 

She's never lived in the UK or paid tax here- BUT the [YOUR] NHS is now liable for this Hungarian mother's health bills

 

 
 

DAILY MAIL

[BRITISH EHIC CARD]

WHY THE CARDS  ARE SO SOUGHT AFTER

ACCESS to a BRITISH EHIC CARD guaranteeing FREE TREATMENT is valuable in large parts of Eastern Europe, where HEALTH CARE can be EXPENSIVE.

 

HUNGARY: Healthcare is provided through an insurance system, which  with contributions of 8.5 per cent automatically deducted from wages (an average of £ 30 a month, double for self employed).

POLAND: Insurance-based health system funded through the National Health Fund, costing employees £40 a month on average. As in many other countries, the uninsured must pay for healthcare in full.

SLOVAKIA: Everyone who is employed must make contributions to state health insurance, about £34 a month or double if you are self employed. Those who are unemployed can have contributions paid by the state but health provision is basic.

BULGARIA: Contributions to the National Health Insurance Fund are compulsory for anyone in work and are £19 a month on average.

ROMANIA: Health service funded through mandatory insurance, costing £20 a month on average. Not all treatments are covered.

SLOVENIA: Compulsory health care insurance costing £46 a nmonth covers all emergency health care services. Additional payments for other treatments.

CZECH REPUBLIC:  Mandatory health care insurance of an average £22 a month. Pensioners' premiums are paid by the state.

 

EXTRACT

Ani Horvath finally states:

On July 9., I visited a variety of clinics in Budapest. The EHIC was accepted everywhere.

At an ophthalmologist, staff said the EHIC would cover emergency treatment, but the n tried to book me in to see a doctor, without checking any 'emergency' symptoms.

I went to a transplant clinic and said I had liver problems and was told I could use the EHIC for an immediate appointment.

At the birth centre, a manager said the EHIC would cover appointments while I was pregnant in Hungary.

To the delivery covered, I would have to get another form from the UK, called an S2. This simply requires a letter from a GP and asks for identification details, contact information, nationality, where to wish to give birth and your pregnancy dates.

'Bring back one of those forms and everything will be fine, 'We can treat you even if it is not an emergency.'

The dermatologist manager said I could use the form EHIC for a skin check-up and for face cream-clearly non-emergency treatments.

I did not use the card to obtain any medical treatment, but these cards are a TREASURE TROVE for PEOPLE HERE because STATE HEALTH INSURANCE is so EXPENSIVE

We can get Hungarian EHICs to use when we are abroad on holiday. But the process of getting one is much stricter than in the UK.

http://investigations@dailymail.co.uk

Daily Mail

INVESTIGATING UNIT

 

[[HIGHLIGHTING AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

 

H F-519

 

 

[WHAT THE EU AND THE SO-CALLED HUMAN RIGHTS ACT HAS ACCOMPLISHED]

 

The marauding migrants from Africa threaten our standard of living, says Phillip Hammond

  1. Marauding migrants threaten our standard of

     

     

    living,

     

    says ... - Daily Mail-Monday,August 10,2015

     

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../The-marauding-migrants-Africa-threaten-standard-living-says-Philip-Hammond-Foreign-Secretary-says-not-possible-Europe-...

     

    AND

  2. 300,000!

     

     

    That was the overall number of migrants last year - Daily Mail

  3. Immigration Concern-info

 

 

Crackdown on rogue firms using illegals

ROGUE firms employing illegal migrants face a major crackdown this autumn, it emerged last night

Ministers will dramatically ramp up action against illegal workers in a drive to create a 'hostile environment'.

The probe, which will involve hundreds of raids, will focus on construction, care and cleaning industries, it was reported

Immigration minister James Brokenshire told the Times:   'Rogue employers who give jobs to illegal migrants are denying work to UK citizens and legal migrants and helping driving down wages.

Meanwhile, a new IMMIGRATION BILL to be published this autumn will tackle the scourge of exploited illegal immigrants given low wages to work in poor conditions.

FOREIGN NATIONALS welcomed to Britain for the 2012 Olympics are STILL HERE-ILLEGALLY despite LOSING THEIR ASYLUM CLAIMS

Ministers have revealed that 18 of the thousands of athletes and coaches given Olympic visas HAVE DODGED BEING KICKED OUT OF THE COUNTRY despite officials rejecting applications for REFUGEE STATUS

Another 54 were given political asylum after refusing to return home after the London Games. ONLY TEN HAVE BEEN KICKED OUT.

The figures were revealed by Tory MP Phillip Davies , who said:

WE MUST BE A LAUGHING STOCK AROUND THE WORLD. NO WONDER THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS IN CALAIS ARE SO DESPERATE TO GET HERE.   WE WILL HAVE HAD THE RIO OLYMPICS BEFORE WE MANAGE TO ROOT OUT THESE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS FROM THEE LONDON OLYMPICS.'

*

[As an island people now comprising  within its territory possibly every race on PLANET EARTH with ENGLAND known as one of the most crowded countries in Europe and know doubt in the world.. We ask how has it come to this? To a people who have a natural barrier-the sea. Well! we all know the answer!

FIRST! because we are in the  MAD HOUSE-EU

SECOND! because we are in the iniquitous so-called HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

THIRDLY! because successive governments have failed to remember the warning of the far-seeing Enock Powell so many decades ago

FOURTHLY! because the  the PEOPLE were slow to wake-up to the reality of the situation during the BLIAR REIGN.

FIFTHLY! because many voters who could not stomach a LABOUR GOVERNMENT and who  would have voted UKIP decided to save the CON PARTY

The political system in our country needs to change-URGENTLY! ]

 

*

 UK voting system'ignores will of millions'

by Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail --Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24... 

 

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 10-2015

H F 520

[IT IS STARK RAVING BONKERS!

MR PRO-EU CAMERON]

 

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

 

 

 

 

 

End

this

migrant madness

 

 

IN SCENES of utter bedlam thousands of illegal immigrants break through security fences and storm the Channel Tunnel.. night after night, trying to jump aboard lorries bound for Britain.

At Calais, holidaymakers and haulage drivers sit petrified, windows and doors locked shut, and migrants brazenly try to clamber abroard their vehicles.

In Kent, the M20 is turned into a lorry park on a daily basis as services are cancelled by besieged Eurotunnel bosses. Local people are trapped in their homes, unable to make even short journeys on gridlocked roads.

Thre Calais shambles may have been building for months, but make no mistake: we are now witnessing a crisis which is having devastating repercussions across Britain.

Family holidays in mainland Europe, long planned and saved for, are being ruined.

Vital exports are suffering because businesses are unable  to get their products out of the country. The Kent economy alone is losing £1.5Million a day.

     Millions of pounds worth of food are being destroyed because of contamination by migrants jumping into lorries or because products cannot get through- potentially hiking up food prices for everyone.

The blame for this chaos is spread far and wide. Western leaders-chief among them David Cameron-created a gateway to mainland Europe from Africa by topping Gaddafi in Libya, then abandoning the country to anarchy.

The Italian government has made a mockery of the EU by ignoring rules stating that migrants must claim asylum in the first safe country they enter. The European commission has been typically pathetic in enforcing its own laws and protocols.

The French-behaving deplorably as the Italians-shamelessly wave migrants on towards the UK, failing to take their fingerprints and, when they do detect stowaways, releasing them within minutes.

Most egregiously, they continue to allow the migrants to use the woods near Calais as a base, complete with restaurant, to launch their attacks on passing vehicles and the Eurotunnel.

As the Tory MP Damian Collins furious at the lack of law enforcement by the French remarked: 'I can't believe they would be so lax in protecting an airport or other sensitive facility.'

Then there is our own Government which refuses to utter a word of critism of France for fear they will rip up treaties allowing Britain to carry out border checks on its soil.

Mr Cameron spent yesterday in Vietnam making a posturing announcement on how UK businesses will have to produce an annual statement on the steps they have taken to ensure their suppliers have not used slave labour.

The bitter irony is that the more the situation at Calais deteriates the bigger the British black economy-in which illegal immigrants work in the most appaling conditions-continues to grow. There is 'modern slavery' on his doorstep.

The Government's strategy is largely limited to giving the French £20,000,000 to bolster security and trying to tackle the problem 'upstream by attempting top stop the people-smuggling boats crossing the Med in the first place.

Both are sensible steps (though £20,000,000 is a derisory sum given the damage being caused to the UK ECONOMY ).

But they do not address the two fundamental reasons why the migrants are massing at Calais rather than in ITALY.

First, we are rightly considered a global soft-touch which will provide them with limitless welfare, free healthcare and education.

And

 Second, the illegal immigrants are getting through our lax border controls, which only encourages more to come and try their luck.

Indeed , Home Secretary Theresa May was yesterday forced to admit that some migrants who stormed the Channel Tunnel had made it to Britain.

At the same time, laws which were introduced to dispel the notion that, once here, even a failed asylum seeker or foreign criminal will never be removed are ruthlessly undermined by human rights lawyers and judges who ride roughshod over the wishes of Parliament and the public.

Only yesterday, the Court of Appeal ruled that a vital system for fast tracking the asylum claims of unfounded claimants was discriminatory and must be abandoned.

ENOUGH! is ENOUGH!

Ministers must stop wringing their hands and insist that the EU enforces its own laws on asylum.

Serious consideration must be given to the demand by hauliers and some MPs and MEPs for the British Army to be utilised to bolster our border defences.

New laws must be introduced that send out an incontrovertible message that economic migrants posing as asylum seekers will be caught, detained and sent home without enjoying a single day of freedom in the UK

The last major Calais crisis at the turn of the century destroyed for ever the Labour government's credibility on immigration.

Unless they urgently get a grip, this latest episode risks doing equally great damage to Mr Cameron's administration.

 

 

 

 

 

  1. News for DAILY MAIL-DOMINIC SANDBROOK


    Daily Mail
    We kept out Hitler so why can't we stop a few thousand migrants in Calais?
    Daily Mail - 20 hours ago
    By Dominic Sandbrook for the Daily Mail. Published: 17:54 EST, 29 July 2015 |
    Updated: 01:26 EST, 30 July 2015. 3.4k shares. 1k. View comments. On the very
     ...

 

 

 

 

*

[AN EXCELLENT ARTICLE BY THE DAILY MAIL WHICH COVERED ALL THE POINTS AT ISSUE AND THE URGENT STEPS REQUIRED NOW! AS THE DAMAGE IS MOUNTING BY THE MINUTE!

 

 

 

[WHILE DAVID CAMERON IS FIDDLING IN FOREIGN FIELDS DISASTER LOOMS AT HOME!]

 

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JULY 30, 2015

H F-516

 

Secret Pentagon Report Reveals

US “Created” ISIS As A “Tool”

To Overthrow Syria’s President Assad

 

 

Dr Nafeez Ahmed
Zero Hedge
May 24, 2015

From the first sudden, and quite dramatic, appearance of the fanatical Islamic group known as ISIS which was largely unheard of until a year ago, on the world’s stage and which promptly replaced the worn out and tired al Qaeda as the world’s terrorist bogeyman, we suggested that the “straight to beheading YouTube clip” purpose behind the Saudi Arabia-funded Islamic State was a simple one: use the Jihadists as the vehicle of choice to achieve a political goal: depose of Syria’s president Assad, who for years has stood in the way of a critical Qatari natural gas pipeline, one which could dethrone Russia as Europe’s dominant – and belligerent – source of energy, reaching an interim climax with the unsuccessful Mediterranean Sea military build up of 2013, which nearly resulted in quasi-world war.

The narrative and the plotline were so transparent, even Russia saw right through them. Recall from September of last year:

If the West bombs Islamic State militants in Syria without consulting Damascus, LiveLeak reports that the anti-ISIS alliance may use the occasion to launch airstrikes against President Bashar Assad’s forces, according to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Clearly comprehending that Obama’s new strategy against ISIS in Syria is all about pushing the Qatar pipeline through (as was the impetus behind the 2013 intervention push), Russia is pushing back noting that the it is using ISIS as a pretext for bombing Syrian government forces and warning that “such a development would lead to a huge escalation of conflict in the Middle East and North Africa.”

But it’s one thing to speculate; it’s something entirely different to have hard proof.

And while speculation was rife that just like the CIA-funded al Qaeda had been used as a facade by the US to achieve its own geopolitical and national interests over the past two decades, so ISIS was nothing more than al Qaeda 2.0, there was no actual evidence of just this.

That may all have changed now when a declassified secret US government document obtained by the public interest law firm, Judicial Watch, shows that Western governments deliberately allied with al-Qaeda and other Islamist extremist groups to topple Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad.

According to investigative reporter Nafeez Ahmed in Medium, the “leaked document reveals that in coordination with the Gulf states and Turkey, the West intentionally sponsored violent Islamist groups to destabilize Assad, despite anticipating that doing so could lead to the emergence of an ‘Islamic State’ in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

According to the newly declassified US document, the Pentagon foresaw the likely rise of the ‘Islamic State’ as a direct consequence of the strategy, but described this outcome as a strategic opportunity to “isolate the Syrian regime.” 

And not just that: as we reported last week, now that ISIS is running around the middle east, cutting people’s heads of in 1080p quality and Hollywood-quality (perhaps literally) video, the US has a credible justification to sell billions worth of modern, sophisticated weapons in the region in order to “modernize” and “replenish” the weapons of such US allies as Saudi Arabia, Israel and Iraq.

But that the US military-industrial complex is a winner every time war breaks out anywhere in the world (usually with the assistance of the CIA) is clear to everyone by now. What wasn’t clear is just how the US predetermined the current course of events in the middle east.

Now, thanks to the following declassified report, we have a far better understanding of not only how current events in the middle east came to be, but what America’s puppermaster role leading up to it all, was. 

From Nafeez Ahmed: Secret Pentagon report reveals West saw ISIS as strategic asset Anti-ISIS coalition knowingly sponsored violent extremists to ‘isolate’ Assad, rollback ‘Shia expansion’, originally posted in Medium.

Hypocrisy

The revelations contradict the official line of Western government on their policies in Syria, and raise disturbing questions about secret Western support for violent extremists abroad, while using the burgeoning threat of terror to justify excessive mass surveillance and crackdowns on civil liberties at home.

Among the batch of documents obtained by Judicial Watch through a federal lawsuit, released earlier this week, is a US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document then classified as “secret,” dated 12th August 2012.

The DIA provides military intelligence in support of planners, policymakers and operations for the US Department of Defense and intelligence community.

So far, media reporting has focused on the evidence that the Obama administration knew of arms supplies from a Libyan terrorist stronghold to rebels in Syria.

Some outlets have reported the US intelligence community’s internal prediction of the rise of ISIS. Yet none have accurately acknowledged the disturbing details exposing how the West knowingly fostered a sectarian, al-Qaeda-driven rebellion in Syria.

Charles Shoebridge, a former British Army and Metropolitan Police counter-terrorism intelligence officer, said:

“Given the political leanings of the organisation that obtained these documents, it’s unsurprising that the main emphasis given to them thus far has been an attempt to embarrass Hilary Clinton regarding what was known about the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi in 2012. However, the documents also contain far less publicized revelations that raise vitally important questions of the West’s governments and media in their support of Syria’s rebellion.”

The West’s Islamists

The newly declassified DIA document from 2012 confirms that the main component of the anti-Assad rebel forces by this time comprised Islamist insurgents affiliated to groups that would lead to the emergence of ISIS. Despite this, these groups were to continue receiving support from Western militaries and their regional allies.

Noting that “the Salafist [sic], the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI [al-Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria,” the document states that “the West, Gulf countries, and Turkey support the opposition,” while Russia, China and Iran “support the [Assad] regime.”

The 7-page DIA document states that al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), the precursor to the ‘Islamic State in Iraq,’ (ISI) which became the ‘Islamic State in Iraq and Syria,’ “supported the Syrian opposition from the beginning, both ideologically and through the media.”

The formerly secret Pentagon report notes that the “rise of the insurgency in Syria” has increasingly taken a “sectarian direction,” attracting diverse support from Sunni “religious and tribal powers” across the region.

In a section titled ‘The Future Assumptions of the Crisis,’ the DIA report predicts that while Assad’s regime will survive, retaining control over Syrian territory, the crisis will continue to escalate “into proxy war.”

The document also recommends the creation of “safe havens under international sheltering, similar to what transpired in Libya when Benghazi was chosen as the command centre for the temporary government.”

In Libya, anti-Gaddafi rebels, most of whom were al-Qaeda affiliated militias, were protected by NATO ‘safe havens’ (aka ‘no fly zones’).

‘Supporting powers want’ ISIS entity

In a strikingly prescient prediction, the Pentagon document explicitly forecasts the probable declaration of “an Islamic State through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria.”

Nevertheless, “Western countries, the Gulf states and Turkey are supporting these efforts” by Syrian “opposition forces” fighting to “control the eastern areas (Hasaka and Der Zor), adjacent to Western Iraqi provinces (Mosul and Anbar)”:

“… there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran).”

The secret Pentagon document thus provides extraordinary confirmation that the US-led coalition currently fighting ISIS, had three years ago welcomed the emergence of an extremist “Salafist Principality” in the region as a way to undermine Assad, and block off the strategic expansion of Iran. Crucially, Iraq is labeled as an integral part of this “Shia expansion.”

The establishment of such a “Salafist Principality” in eastern Syria, the DIA document asserts, is “exactly” what the “supporting powers to the [Syrian] opposition want.” Earlier on, the document repeatedly describes those “supporting powers” as “the West, Gulf countries, and Turkey.”

Further on, the document reveals that Pentagon analysts were acutely aware of the dire risks of this strategy, yet ploughed ahead anyway.

The establishment of such a “Salafist Principality” in eastern Syria, it says, would create “the ideal atmosphere for AQI to return to its old pockets in Mosul and Ramadi.” Last summer, ISIS conquered Mosul in Iraq, and just this month has also taken control of Ramadi.

Such a quasi-state entity will provide:

“… a renewed momentum under the presumption of unifying the jihad among Sunni Iraq and Syria, and the rest of the Sunnis in the Arab world against what it considers one enemy. ISI could also declare an Islamic State through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which will create grave danger in regards to unifying Iraq and the protection of territory.”

The 2012 DIA document is an Intelligence Information Report (IIR), not a “finally evaluated intelligence” assessment, but its contents are vetted before distribution. The report was circulated throughout the US intelligence community, including to the State Department, Central Command, the Department of Homeland Security, the CIA, FBI, among other agencies.

In response to my questions about the strategy, the British government simply denied the Pentagon report’s startling revelations of deliberate Western sponsorship of violent extremists in Syria. A British Foreign Office spokesperson said:

“AQ and ISIL are proscribed terrorist organisations. The UK opposes all forms of terrorism. AQ, ISIL, and their affiliates pose a direct threat to the UK’s national security. We are part of a military and political coalition to defeat ISIL in Iraq and Syria, and are working with international partners to counter the threat from AQ and other terrorist groups in that region. In Syria we have always supported those moderate opposition groups who oppose the tyranny of Assad and the brutality of the extremists.”

The DIA did not respond to request for comment.

Strategic asset for regime-change

Security analyst Shoebridge, however, who has tracked Western support for Islamist terrorists in Syria since the beginning of the war, pointed out that the secret Pentagon intelligence report exposes fatal contradictions at the heart of official pronunciations:

“Throughout the early years of the Syria crisis, the US and UK governments, and almost universally the West’s mainstream media, promoted Syria’s rebels as moderate, liberal, secular, democratic, and therefore deserving of the West’s support. Given that these documents wholly undermine this assessment, it’s significant that the West’s media has now, despite their immense significance, almost entirely ignored them.”

According to Brad Hoff, a former US Marine who served during the early years of the Iraq War and as a 9/11 first responder at the Marine Corps Headquarters in Battalion Quantico from 2000 to 2004, the just released Pentagon report for the first time provides stunning affirmation that:

“US intelligence predicted the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS), but instead of clearly delineating the group as an enemy, the report envisions the terror group as a US strategic asset.”

Hoff, who is managing editor of Levant Report — ?an online publication run by Texas-based educators who have direct experience of the Middle East?—?points out that the DIA document “matter-of-factly” states that the rise of such an extremist Salafist political entity in the region offers a “tool for regime change in Syria.”

The DIA intelligence report shows, he said, that the rise of ISIS only became possible in the context of the Syrian insurgency?—?“there is no mention of US troop withdrawal from Iraq as a catalyst for Islamic State’s rise, which is the contention of innumerable politicians and pundits.” The report demonstrates that:

“The establishment of a ‘Salafist Principality’ in Eastern Syria is ‘exactly’ what the external powers supporting the opposition want (identified as ‘the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey’) in order to weaken the Assad government.”

The rise of a Salafist quasi-state entity that might expand into Iraq, and fracture that country, was therefore clearly foreseen by US intelligence as likely?—?but nevertheless strategically useful?—?blowback from the West’s commitment to “isolating Syria.”

Complicity

Critics of the US-led strategy in the region have repeatedly raised questions about the role of coalition allies in intentionally providing extensive support to Islamist terrorist groups in the drive to destabilize the Assad regime in Syria.

The conventional wisdom is that the US government did not retain sufficient oversight on the funding to anti-Assad rebel groups, which was supposed to be monitored and vetted to ensure that only ‘moderate’ groups were supported.

However, the newly declassified Pentagon report proves unambiguously that years before ISIS launched its concerted offensive against Iraq, the US intelligence community was fully aware that Islamist militants constituted the core of Syria’s sectarian insurgency.

Despite that, the Pentagon continued to support the Islamist insurgency, even while anticipating the probability that doing so would establish an extremist Salafi stronghold in Syria and Iraq.

As Shoebridge told me, “The documents show that not only did the US government at the latest by August 2012 know the true extremist nature and likely outcome of Syria’s rebellion”?—?namely, the emergence of ISIS?—?“but that this was considered an advantage for US foreign policy. This also suggests a decision to spend years in an effort to deliberately mislead the West’s public, via a compliant media, into believing that Syria’s rebellion was overwhelmingly ‘moderate.’”

Annie Machon, a former MI5 intelligence officer who blew the whistle in the 1990s on MI6 funding of al-Qaeda to assassinate Libya’s former leader Colonel Gaddafi, similarly said of the revelations:

“This is no surprise to me. Within individual countries there are always multiple intelligence agencies with competing agendas.”

She explained that MI6’s Libya operation in 1996, which resulted in the deaths of innocent people, “happened at precisely the time when MI5 was setting up a new section to investigate al-Qaeda.”

This strategy was repeated on a grand scale in the 2011 NATO intervention in Libya, said Machon, where the CIA and MI6 were:

“… supporting the very same Libyan groups, resulting in a failed state, mass murder, displacement and anarchy. So the idea that elements of the American military-security complex have enabled the development of ISIS after their failed attempt to get NATO to once again ‘intervene’ is part of an established pattern. And they remain indifferent to the sheer scale of human suffering that is unleashed as a result of such game-playing.”

Divide and rule

Several US government officials have conceded that their closest allies in the anti-ISIS coalition were funding violent extremist Islamist groups that became integral to ISIS.

US Vice President Joe Biden, for instance, admitted last year that Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar and Turkey had funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to Islamist rebels in Syria that metamorphosed into ISIS.

But he did not admit what this internal Pentagon document demonstrates?—?that the entire covert strategy was sanctioned and supervised by the US, Britain, France, Israel and other Western powers.

The strategy appears to fit a policy scenario identified by a recent US Army-commissioned RAND Corp report.

The report, published four years before the DIA document, called for the US “to capitalise on the Shia-Sunni conflict by taking the side of the conservative Sunni regimes in a decisive fashion and working with them against all Shiite empowerment movements in the Muslim world.”

The US would need to contain “Iranian power and influence” in the Gulf by “shoring up the traditional Sunni regimes in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Pakistan.” Simultaneously, the US must maintain “a strong strategic relationship with the Iraqi Shiite government” despite its Iran alliance.

The RAND report confirmed that the “divide and rule” strategy was already being deployed “to create divisions in the jihadist camp. Today in Iraq such a strategy is being used at the tactical level.”

The report observed that the US was forming “temporary alliances” with al-Qaeda affiliated “nationalist insurgent groups” that have fought the US for four years in the form of “weapons and cash.” Although these nationalists “have cooperated with al-Qaeda against US forces,” they are now being supported to exploit “the common threat that al-Qaeda now poses to both parties.”

The 2012 DIA document, however, further shows that while sponsoring purportedly former al-Qaeda insurgents in Iraq to counter al-Qaeda, Western governments were simultaneously arming al-Qaeda insurgents in Syria.

The revelation from an internal US intelligence document that the very US-led coalition supposedly fighting ‘Islamic State’ today, knowingly created ISIS in the first place, raises troubling questions about recent government efforts to justify the expansion of state anti-terror powers.

In the wake of the rise of ISIS, intrusive new measures to combat extremism including mass surveillance, the Orwellian ‘prevent duty’ and even plans to enable government censorship of broadcasters, are being pursued on both sides of the Atlantic, much of which disproportionately targets activists, journalists and ethnic minorities, especially Muslims.

Yet the new Pentagon report reveals that, contrary to Western government claims, the primary cause of the threat comes from their own deeply misguided policies of secretly sponsoring Islamist terrorism for dubious geopolitical purposes.


Dr Nafeez Ahmed is an investigative journalist, bestselling author and international security scholar. A former Guardian writer, he writes the ‘System Shift’ column for VICE’s Motherboard, and is also a columnist for Middle East Eye. He is the winner of a 2015 Project Censored Award, known as the ‘Alternative Pulitzer Prize’, for Outstanding Investigative Journalism for his Guardian work, and was selected in the Evening Standard’s ‘Power 1,000’ most globally influential Londoners.

Nafeez has also written for The Independent, Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Scotsman, Foreign Policy, The Atlantic, Quartz, Prospect, New Statesman, Le Monde diplomatique, New Internationalist, Counterpunch, Truthout, among others. He is the author of A User’s Guide to the Crisis of Civilization: And How to Save It (2010), and the scifi thriller novel ZERO POINT, among other books. His work on the root causes and covert operations linked to international terrorism officially contributed to the

 9/11 Commission and the 7/7 Coroner’s Inquest.

 

This article was posted: Sunday, May 24, 2015 at 5:13 am

 



 

 

 

 

 

H F 512

How US Corporations Financed Nazi Germany & USSR
    by ANTONY C. SUTTON



Antony C. Sutton gave an interview in 1980 discussing his research on the funding of World War II, when American and European financiers were funding both the Nazi party and the communists.

Sutton was an economics professor at California State University, Los Angeles and a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution from 1968 to 1973.

In 1973, Sutton published a popularized, condensed version of the three volumes called National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union and was thereby forced out of the Hoover Institution.

His conclusion from his research on the issue was that the conflicts of the Cold War were "not fought to restrain communism", since the United States, through financing the Soviet Union "directly or indirectly armed both sides in at least Korea and Vietnam"; rather, these wars were organised in order "to generate multibillion-dollar armaments contracts"

For impressive evidence of Western participation in the early phase of Soviet economic growth, see Antony C.


Other Top Stories

Greece Is a Tragi-Comedy by TAKI THEODORACOPULOS (DAILY MAIL)
Mind Control Victim Paul Bonacci Awarded $1Million by URI DOWBENKO
HSBC Bank: Secret Origins of a Drug Money Laundry by GREAT GAME INDIA
Mars Rover Finds Aztec Style Statue on Mars by JIM STONE
How US Corporations Financed Nazi Germany & USSR by ANTONY C. SUTTON
Iron Curtain Over America:Russia, Khazars & Talmud by JOHN BEATY
 

 

 

 

JULY-2015

H F 508

 

WHY WE MUST!

LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC

NAZI-PLANNED EU.

No 1

 

If we really want to escape the grip of human rights law-we must quit the EU.

 

Daily Mail

Monday, May 15,2006.

 

THE

 

Melanie

Phillips

Column

 

 

Once again, the Prime Minister is trying to surf a wave of popular outrage by announcing he will take action - which on closer examination proves to be mere froth - not least because his own policy lies at the very heart of the problem.

 

Thus Tony Blair has spoken out against ‘an abuse of common sense’

In the way the human rights law has been used to allow nine Afghan hijackers to remain in Britain, or free a rapist from prison only for him to commit MURDER.

 

BUT it is his own human rights law, which has quite simply altered the entire legal and moral culture of this country, and taken an axe to

COMMON SENSE

 

The Judge in last week’s Afghan ruling has been roundly pilloried. BUT common sense in this case was trounced in

2004

-when an immigration tribunal ruled on human rights grounds that it was too dangerous to send the hijackers back to Afghanistan

-       even though the Taliban, from whom they fled, had been replaced by a Western-backed government.

 

The root of the problem here is not the wretched judge BUT the Government itself, which dragged its feet over the case for years. This was because it was paralysed by the fact that

 

HUMAN RIGHTS LAW

 

-described only last week by the Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith, as the Government’s ‘greatest achievement’ -has created a culture of legalised lunacy.

 

Disruptive.

 

Detectives across the country are refusing to issue ‘wanted’ posters for missing foreign criminals because they say they do not want to breach their right to privacy, and risk lawsuits by releasing their names and photographs.

 

The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency routinely shreds the driving records of speeding and drunken drivers because bureaucrats are afraid of human rights law. That means thousands of drivers with a bad history escape with lighter punishments because Courts cannot learn the full truth about their past.

 

It is no use saying that such judgments misread human rights law since, because such law consists of a balancing act between competing ‘rights’ requiring the Courts to arbitrate between them, no one can be sure how any disruptive cases will end up.

 

The fact is that ruling after human rights ruling has turned right and wrong on their heads and radically undermined the covenant of responsibility between the INDIVIDUAL and the STATE.

 

To take an egregious example, human rights law has DESTROYED this country’s ability to CONTROL its OWN BORDERS.

 

The Courts have used the ‘human right’ to family life to reward

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.

 

Their absurdly generalised interpretation of the prohibition against torture - which wrenched this principle out of ALL recognition - has made it all but impossible to deport those foreigners who threaten this country’s security.

 

The LAW LORDS’ perverse reading of ‘DISCRIMINATION’ last year has meant that such suspects can’t even be locked up pending removal from this country.

 

WHAT KIND OF HUMAN RIGHTS ARE THESE,

 

-which actually force a country to destroy its own security along with its principles of

CITIZENSHIP

 

FAIRNESS

 

And

 

OBLIGATION?

 

At the weekend, Mr Blair said he was considering fresh legislation to prevent future Court rulings from ‘overruling the Government’. here lie the first clues to the fact that these are likely to be empty words.

 

FIRST, He’s only considering any change.

 

SECOND, human rights law doesn’t give the COURTS the POWER to overrule the GOVERNMENT.

All they can do is declare legislation incompatible with human rights law, thus putting pressure on MINSTERS. So Mr Blair has given us a straw man, which he promises he will knock down.

 

PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES.

 

PARALYSED

 

BUT the whole point of human rights law is that it is supposed to be an overarching set of principles. So it CAN’T be CHANGED.

And in any case, what kind of overarching principles are these which in the Lord Chancellor’s opinion, actually imperil

PUBLIC SAFETY.

 

Lord Falconer appears to be saying that it’s not human rights law that’s at fault, but certain officials who are misunderstanding it. This is completely and lamentably to miss the point.

 

It’s not merely that this law has paralysed public bodies such as the police and the intelligence service, which say they can barely move for fear of falling foul of it.

 

More fundamentally still, human rights law has driven

 

JUSTICE

 

MORALITY

 

And

 

SOCIAL ORDER

 

-off the rails altogether.

 

It has acted as a grievance charter fuelling the ‘victim culture’ in which all minorities are seen as incapable of being held responsible for their actions.

 

As such, it has become a principle weapon against the

 

CULTURE and IDENTITY of the NATION.

-       and by transferring power to the JUDGES, has delivered a powerful blow against DEMOCRACY.

 

Abolishing the HUMAN RIGHTS ACT would certainly help put a brake on that process. BUT the problem would remain that Britain is signed up to the

 

European Convention on Human Rights,

 

-       which would still have supremacy over our laws.

 

Look for example at the Chahal judgment by the European Court of Human Rights, the key ruling preventing Britain deporting foreign undesirables.

 

This held that, if a person faced torture or inhuman treatment abroad, the risk to that individual from deporting him could not even be balanced against the risk he might pose to the country, which allowed him to stay.

 

IN other words, this ruling was a specific attack on the right of the country to decide what was in its citizens’ own best interests either to derogate from bits of this CONVENTION - as every other signatory BUT Britain has in fact done - or leave altogether.

 

Undemocratic.

 

Yesterday, Lord Falconer gave the game away when he acknowledged that- although the Human Rights Convention has separate origins from the European Union - no country can be a member of the EU unless he is also a CONVENTION signatory.

 

TO SOME OF US, OF COURSE, that is precisely WHY we should leave the EU, in order to

 

RESTORE

 

-OUR POWERS

of

 

SELF-GOVERNMENT

 

And

 

DEMOCRACY

 

But the fact that we are the Human rights prisoner of the EU is why this GOVERNMENT will never address the deformities of human rights law.

 

The usual suspects scream that it would be unthinkable to abolish ‘human rights’. How absurd. Real human rights are very different. Indeed, before ‘human rights’ law took hold we were rather

 

MORE FREE,

 

-not less.

 

INSTEAD, we would be abolishing the arbitrary and undemocratic power of the JUDGES to impose upon us a particular agenda [which is un-English] -far from universal.

In the remarkable words last year of the senior Law Lord, Lord Bingham, human rights law existed to protect vulnerable minorities - who are sometimes disliked, resented or despised -against the howls of ‘majority opinion’.

 

It would seem to follow that - for the JUDICIARY - Afghan hijackers, murders and other criminals are vulnerable minorities’, while the [Peace-loving majority] who are their potential victims have NO HUMAN RIGHTS at all.

 

Extricating OUR NATION from this MESS would undoubtedly be complicated and difficult. BUT UNLESS WE DO SO, we are unlikely much longer to have a NATION worthy of the NAME.

* * *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets are ours!]

MAY/06

 

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?

*

There are well over 1000 bulletins on our website on the COLLECTIVIST-SOVIETISED UNDEMOCRATIC NAZI-PLANNED EU

 

 

Q&A: The Lisbon Treaty-2008

Then look at the way in which Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer [Blair’s old flat-mate], has been twisting and turning. There might need to be legislation, he said, to ensure that human rights law would have no effect on

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian the late TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

 

 

LINKS to Works of Vernon Coleman-A PATRIOT A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/A1042/CON30/B404/B308/

A1730/A1728/A1739/A24

A MATTER OF FACT!

NO 3

 

ABOUT THE USA

 

[2003]

 

ROGUE [POLITICAL-CORPORATE-MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN ] AMERICA

 

www.vernoncoleman.com

 

[A HISTORY OF THE OIL INDUSTRY IN IRAQ / IRAN AND ITS BRUTAL CONSEQUENCES FOR ITS PEOPLES.]

 

America only entered World War I (on the side of Britain and France) after both its new allies and new enemies were pretty much exhausted by the fighting.  Once it agreed to join in the war America imposed conditions which included the demand that America's economic and political objectives be taken into account when the war was over.  One of the objectives was access to new sources of raw material, particularly oil.   In February 1919, Sir Arthur Hirtzel, a leading British official warned:

 'It should be borne in mind that the Standard Oil Company is very anxious to take over IRAQ.'

 America demanded that it's oil companies be allowed to negotiate freely with the new puppet monarchy of King Faisal (the monarch whom the British had put on the throne in IRAQ).  And so  Iraq's oil was divided up between the allies.  Five per cent of the oil went to an oil magnet called Gulbebenkian ( later known as Mr Five Per Cent' who had helped negotiate the agreement).  The other 95per cent was split four ways between

BRITAIN, FRANCE, HOLLAND and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Companies now known as British Petroleum, SHELL, MOBIL and EXXON pretty much had a MONOPOLY of the oil available.  (Iraqi oil was split this way until 1958 when there was a REVOLUTION in IRAQ)

American influence in the region was sealed when the al-Saud family and the United Stats of America created Saudi Arabia in the 1930's pretty much as an American colony. It was no coincidence that the American Embassy in Riyadh, the capital city, was situated in the local oil company building.

The Americans were not , however, satisfied with their share of Middle East oil.  The wanted CONTROL. They had to get rid of the British. And their chance came with the Second World War.

The Americans unceasingly portray themselves as Britain's saviour. This is a wicked misrepresentation. As it had been in the great War.  America was ruthlessly opportunistic.

Britain was greatly weakened by the Second World War but America grew tremendously in power as a result of what happened in the early 1940's.  The Roosevelt and Truman administrations (which were dominated by the banking and oil interests [As is the situation in JUNE 2010] decided to restructure the world to ensure that the USA would  be on top. 

THEY WANTED  CONTROL OF THE WORLD'S OIL.

They wanted USA dominated

GLOBALISATION

( to which end they created the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank in 1944)

They wanted the dollar to be the ONLY significant world currency.  And they wanted the USA to have military superiority in all types of weapons.

Winston Churchill was so worried by what he could see happening that on March 4th 1944 (three months before D DAY invasion of Normandy) he sought assurance from the USA that she would not take over

BRITISH OIL INTERESTS.

He wrote to the USA President Roosevelt saying:

' Thank you very much for your assurances about no sheep's eyes on our oilfields in Iran and Iraq.  Let me reciprocate by giving you the fullest assurance that we have no thought of trying to horn in upon your interests or property in Saudi Arabia. My position in this, as in all matters, is that Great Britain seeks no advantage, territorial or otherwise, as a result of this war. On the other hand, she will not be deprived of anything which rightly belongs to her after having given her best services to the good cause, at least not so long as your humble servant is entrusted with the conduct of affairs.'

Sadly, there was nothing that even Churchill could do to save Britain from its new 'enemy'.  In 1953, a CIA coup which put the Shah in power gave Iran to the United States of America. ( The Americans also helped the Shah form his much hated secret police.)

And within a couple of years after that Iraq was jointly controlled by America and Britain.

In 1955 America set up the Baghdad Pact, which was designed, at least in part, to oppose the rise of Arab liberation movements in the Middle East.  Britain and Iraq were signatories, although Iraq was independent only in name.  The British still had military airfields in Iraq which was ruled by a corrupt monarchy.  The people of Iraq, despite having a huge quantity of the world's oil under their feet, were staving and living in abject poverty.

Things changed in Iraq in 1958, A military rebellion launched a REVOLUTION

which was to have dramatic consequences on the world.  The day after the revolution started the Americans put 20,000 marines into Lebanon and over 6000 paratroopers dropped into Jordan.  Under Eisenhower's leadership the USA and the UK had made it clear that they would go to war to protect their interests in Lebanon and Jordan.

The British, rather naively, thought that they were simply protecting their interests outside Iraq.  the Americans had bigger thoughts. they wanted to go into Iraq, overturn the revolution and put a new puppet government (friendly to the USA, of course) in charge in Baghdad.

BUT THE AMERICANS WERE STOPPED.

The Iraq revolution was too big. And it had much support from other Arab countries, from the people's republic of China and from the USSR. the Americans glumly gave up their imperialist plans.

But they didn't give up completely.

The thwarted Americans added Iraq to their growing list of terrorist nations and gave great support to right wing Kurdish elements who were fighting the Iraq government.  then, in the late 1970's the Americans suported the government of Saddam Hussein in its fight against communism.   In the 1980's the Americans supported (with money and arms) Saddam Hussein's Iraq in its eight years war with Iran , a country over which America had lost control during Iran's islamic Revolution of 1970.  The Americans openly admitted that they were intervening in order to safeguard their access to the region's oil and they slightly less openly hoped that Iraq and Iran would weaken each other and enable the USA to take over. 

'I hope they kill each other,'

former secretary of state Henry Kissinger [ a Bilderberger and a member of the ruling elite of the USA the Council on Foreign Relations who decide the Foreign Policy of the country]

is said to have remarked.

The Americans provided Iraq's air force with satellite photographs of Iranian targets and sent anti-aircraft missiles to Iran so that the Iranians could shoot down the aircraft which the Iraqis sent over.  America fought on both sides of the war and was well aware that Saddam Hussein was using chemical weapons.

Over a million people died and both countries were left weaker. ( Bizarrely, and hypocritically, in 2003 George W Bush was claiming that Saddam Hussein's use of chemical weapons in this war was one of the main reasons for attacking Iraq.)  The money America made from selling missiles to Iran was used to finance the CONTRAS who were fighting the Socialist government in Nicaragua.  Reagan, USA President at the time, disapproved of socialist regimes and wanted to get rid of this one in particular. (It is perhaps unfair to ascribe such depth of feeling to Reagan himself, rather than to his advisors.)

The war between Iraq and Iran didn't finish until 1988, by which time Iraq had become friendly with the USSR.

But then the USSR was taken over by Gorbachev, who wanted to end the COLD WAR and a permanent detente with America. Gorbachev withdrew Soviet support from Iraq (as he had withdrawn it from countries in eastern Europe) and the world suddenly changed yet again.

After the war with Iran Saddam Hussein had accumulated massive debts.  The low price of oil meant that his income didn't match his national outgoings.  the Iraqi president accused Kuwait of drilling for oil in Iraqi territory and then announced that Kuwait wasn't a separate nation at all but a province of Iraq.  Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait in 1990.  America (with an INTERNATIONAL FORCE) attacked, the resultant war was over in weeks and in 1991 the Americans got back into Iraq.  In the decade that followed they have used sanctions, bombings and blockades to weaken the Iraqi people and destroy their spirit.  American sanctions against Iraq do not target Saddam Hussein,

THEY TARGET THE IRAQI PEOPLE.

Now the Americans, led by oil man George W Bush are going back to Iraq [2003]. Americans do not give a fig for HUMAN RIGHTS and they know that Saddam Hussein is NO THREAT TO AMERICA.   They know well that he has NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.  (And even if he did have them the Americans have the military capability to DESTROY IRAQ IN SECONDS)  They surely also know that Saddam Hussein has NOTHING in COMMON with OSAMA bin LADEN.

 

AMERICA IS GOING BACK INTO IRAQ FOR THE SAME ,GOOD OLD REASON

 

OIL!

[This article was written in 2003 by Vernon Coleman]

www.vernoncoleman.com

*

 

www.JEWSNOTZIONISTS.ORG

*

www.prisonplanet.com/kucinichwe-may-be-funding-our-own-killers-in-afghanistan-JUNE-2010

*

http://www.prisonplanet.com/camp-fema-exclusively-online-for-prison-planet-tv-members.html

MORE FROM VERNON COLEMAN

 

NO 371

Find a war and you'll find that both sides are fighting with weapons supplied (at a price to anyone) by the Americans and British arms industries .  When Americans or British troops are killed they are usually killed with British or American bullets fired from British and American guns.

Is more violence really the only answer? Where will all the violence end?  What does state approved revenge become state sponsored terrorism?  Is America justified in killing innocent people.

Instead of seeking revenge America should lead by example. Instead of retaliating in hatred they should ask for peace. Why does that thought seem so naive?

 

NO 373

American activities in Iraq and elsewhere have reinforced the conflict between Europe and the Muslim world and have helped establish strong fundamentalist Islamic politicians in power.

The American activities in the Middle East are invariably self-serving: the aim is to satisfy the arms industry, the oil industry and Zionists.  the cost is stability and peace.  Americans don't worry about the cost of war because war is usually profitable for the massive arms industry,

NO 322

 In 2003 the Americans claimed that by opposing their enthusiasm for dropping bombs on Iraq the French and Germans were endangering NATO.

Once again the Americans needed to study their history books (though preferably not ones written or published in America). NATO was created to deal with the alleged threat posed by the Soviet Union (a threat which existed largely in the minds of the Americans.

By 2003 there was clearly no longer a threat from the Soviet Union and so there was no need for NATO to continue to exist.

The truth is that NATO only existed in 2003 because the well-paid officials who worked for it were determined to keep it alive.

 

[A REMINDER TO DAVID CAMERON in 2011]

 

Bush and Blair claim that replacing Saddam Hussein is a moral act-designed solely to help the people of Iraq. (Although curiously, Tony Blair, who likes to describe himself as a religious man, and who is allegedly planning to become a Catholic, publicly ignored the Pope's plea for mo war against Iraq.)

If these two are now concerned with replacing 'undemocratic' leaders when will wars ever end?

And why aren't the USA and the UK declaring war on themselves? both have leaders who represent minorities.

Blair repeatedly ignored the large majority of the British electorate who were opposed to the war against Iraq. Can a leader who takes no notice of the people be described as democratic?

MARCH-2011

 

www.vernoncoleman.com

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 19-2014

H F 180

 

Site Map

TERRORISM AND THE ILLUMINATI -- A THREE THOUSAND YEAR HISTORY

 

Chapter Nineteen:  The Muslim Brotherhood

The Nazis

Those secret societies that developed from the Asiatic Brethren, and preserving the doctrines and rituals of the Shabbeteans, divided in two directions. The first, was the Freemasonry in Egypt, resulting in the Salafi movement. The second was those principal occult societies of the Occult Revival of the late nineteenth century. However, these two divergent lines would continue to collaborate. Specifically, the European arm of this tradition would culminate in the creation of the Nazis, who would then collaborate, throughout the twentieth century, with their counterparts in the Middle East, the Salafi, to participate in the propagation of terrorism on behalf of the Illuminati.

Like the Salafi, the Nazis were also a principal component in the execution of Illuminati strategy, in their case, towards the creation of World War II. In accord with the plan worked out by Albert Pike, and summarized by William Guy Carr, the plan for WWII “was to be fomented by using the differences between Fascists and Political Zionists. This was to be fought so that Nazism would be destroyed and the power of Political Zionism increased so that the sovereign state of Israel could be established in Palestine.” [1] Therefore, the harsh terms imposed by the agents of the Illuminati at the Treaty of Versailles, that ruined Germany financially, were to set the stage for World War II.

These harsh economic conditions created the situation in which a leader like Hitler could arise, a leader promoted to power by Illuminati backers. It was Montagu Norman, as Chairman of the Bank of England, who, from 1933 through 1939, met repeatedly with Hjalmar Schacht, Reich Minister of Economics, and a member of the Rhodes Round Table, to plan the overall budget of the Nazi regime with British credit, and guided the strategies of Hitler’s primary supporters, the Rockefellers, Warburgs, and Harrimans.

While Hitler cynically denounced the company as an “international Jewish organization,” Schacht nevertheless awarded huge contracts to produce munitions and chemicals for the German military buildup to IG Farben, the giant chemical firm, that ultimately produced the Zyklon B gas used in Nazi extermination camps. And, IG Farben and Rockefeller’s Standard Oil of New Jersey were effectively a single firm, having been merged in hundreds of cartel arrangements. It was led, up until 1937 by Rockefeller’s partners, the Frankist Warburgs. [2] After WW II began, Standard Oil pledged to keep the merger with I.G. Farben, even if the U.S. entered the war.

In addition, the Nazi party was thoroughly an occult organization. The Nazis were the result of a merging of the O.T.O of Crowley and the Thule Gesselschaft of Germany. The chief architect of the Thule group was Baron Rudolf von Sebottendorff, who had contact with Dervish Orders, and knew much about Sufism. The doctrines of the Thule order were founded on The Coming Race by the Bulwer-Lytton, and the theory of the Atlantean origins of the Aryan race developed by Blavatsky. In 1919, the members of the Thule Society formed a political party named the “Germany Workers Party”. They were in turn later renamed the “National Socialist German Workers’ Party”, more popularly known as the Nazis, by Adolph Hitler in 1920, who became Chancellor of Germany in 1933 and dictator in 1934. Also a member of the Thule Society was black magician, Heinrich Himmler, leader of the SS, whose insignia was a Runic symbol, thought to represent the lost wisdom of their supposed Aryan forefathers.

The Muslim Brotherhood

The fruit of the shared occult knowledge of the two factions that developed out of Afghani’s influence, the Nazis and the Salafis, would work together to revive the ancient mind-control tactics of the Ismailis, to form a body of agent-provocateurs, more commonly known as terrorists. The name of the organization is the Muslim Brotherhood. Ultimately, following the example set by Afghani and Abduh, the upper leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood would profess Islam only to deceive. In truth, their true faith was the Gnostic cult of the Ismailis, through which they shared a common history with their occult brethren in the West. Thus, as Robert Dreyfuss described, in Hostage to Khomeini, a revealing look at the conspiracy to promote the Muslim Brotherhood:

The Muslim Brotherhood is a London creation, forged as the standard-bearer of an ancient, anti-religious (pagan) heresy that has plagued Islam since the establishment of the Islamic community (umma) by the Prophet Mohammed in the seventh century. Representing organized Islamic fundamentalism, the organization called the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan al-Muslimum in Arabic) was officially founded in Egypt, in 1929, by the British agent Hasan al-Banna, a Sufi mystic. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood is the umbrella under which a host of fundamentalist Sufi, Sunni, and radical Shiite brotherhoods and societies flourish. [3]

The founder of the Muslim Brotherhood was a Freemason, named Hassan al Banna, born in 1906, who developed from the influence of the three Salafi reformers, Afghani, Abduh and Rida. Banna’s father was a student of Abduh, while Banna himself was greatly influenced by Rashid Rida. By age twenty-one, Banna was introduced to the leadership of Al- Manar, founded by Rida, and, beginning in the early 1920s, would often meet and discuss with Rida. Through Rida, Banna developed his opposition to Western influence in Egypt, in favor of “pure Islam”, meaning to the pernicious version of Wahhabism.

When Hitler came to power in the 1930’s, he and Nazi intelligence made contact with al Banna to see if they could work together. [4] Banna was also a devout admirer of Hitler. Banna’s letters to Hitler were so supportive that he and other members of the Brotherhood, were recruited by Nazi Military Intelligence to provide information on the British and work covertly to undermine British control in Egypt. Banna himself said that he had “considerable admiration for the Nazi Brownshirts” and organized his own forces along fascist lines. [5] Banna’s Brotherhood also collaborated with the overtly fascist “Young Egypt” movement, founded in October 1933, by lawyer Ahmed Hussein, and modeled directly on the Hitler party, complete with paramilitary Green Shirts, aping the Nazi Brown Shirts, Nazi salute and literal translations of Nazi slogans. Among its members, Young Egypt counted two later presidents, Gamal Nasser and Anwar Sadat.

The Islamo-Fascists

A key individual in the Islamo-fascist nexus, and go-between for the Nazis and Banna, became the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al Husseini, later the mentor of Yasser Arafat, from 1946 onward. Hajj Amin al Husseini was convicted in absentia after fleeing to Syria for his involvement in the 1920 attack on Jews at the Western Wall. However, despite his involvement and conviction, he was pardoned by the local British High Commissioner Herbert Samuel, and made the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in 1921.

Beginning in 1933, al Husseini regularly met with local Nazi representatives and openly expressed admiration for Hitler’s ideas. During these meetings, he served as a liaison for the Muslim Brotherhood to the Nazis. Between 1936-1939, Adolf Eichmann, oversaw funding from the SS to al Husseini and his associates, to aid their efforts in encouraging a revolt in the region. [6] However, in the late 1930’s, al Husseini openly called for direct aide from Germany to Arab forces, and had to flee to Syria. In April 1941, al Husseini assisted the pro-Nazi revolt in Iraq, and attempts by the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, or the Syrian Nazi Party, to support the revolt after the British moved to suppress it. Those involved included Saddam’s uncle Khairallah Tulfah, and the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, who formed the Baath Parties of Syria and Iraq. [7]

Thus, the mufti was to flee once again, ultimately reaching Berlin, to a hero’s welcome. He remained in Germany as an honored guest and valuable intelligence asset throughout most of the war, met with Hitler on several occasions, and personally recruited leading members of the Bosnian-Muslim “Hanjar” division of the Waffen SS. One member was Alija Izetbegovic, who later lead Bosnia’s move for independence. [8]

In the summer of 1942, when German General Erwin Rommel’s Afrikakorps were poised to march into Cairo, Anwar Sadat, Gamal Nasser and their cronies were in touch with the attacking German force and, with help from the Muslim Brotherhood were preparing an anti-British uprising in Egypt’s capital. [9] A treaty with Germany had been drafted by Sadat, which included provisions for German recognition of an independent, but pro-Axis Egypt, and guarantying that “no British soldier would leave Cairo alive.” When Rommel’s push failed in the fall of 1942, Sadat and several of his co- conspirators were arrested by the British, and sat out much of the remainder of the war in jail.

After the defeat of Nazi Germany, al Husseini fled to Egypt. His arrival in 1946 was a precursor to a steady stream of Third Reich veterans. Cairo became a safe haven for several thousand Nazi fugitives, including former SS Captain Alois Brunner, Adolf Eichmann’s chief deputy. Convicted in absentia for war crimes, Brunner would later reside in Damascus, where he served as a security advisor for the Syrian government.

Several of the Germans, recognizing British puppet King Farouk’s political weakness, soon began conspiring with Nasser and his “Free Officers,” who, in turn, were working closely with the Muslim Brotherhood, to overthrow the king. When Banna was assassinated by Egyptian officials in 1949, the movement was destabilized, but not for long. On July 23, 1952, a coup d’etat was carried out by the Free Officers with Brotherhood assistance. Newsweek marveled that, “The most intriguing aspect [of] the revolt ... was the role played in the coup by the large group of German advisors serving with the Egyptian army... The young officers who did the actual planning consulted the German advisors as to ‘tactics’... This accounted for the smoothness of the operation.” [10]

The Odessa Network

Assisting the Egyptians in coordinating with the Nazis was the CIA, headed by Allen Dulles. A 33rd Degree Freemason and Knight Templar, Allen Dulles was also a founding member of the CFR, an in-law of the Rockefellers, Chairman of the Board of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Board Chairman of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Prior to working for the CIA, Dulles was a director of the J. Henry Schroeder bank in London, a prime instrument employed by Montagu Norman in his support of Nazi of Germany. Allen’s brother John Foster Dulles can be credited for having created the Versailles Treaty’s harsh terms against Germany. And yet, it was the two of them who secretly went to Hitler to confirm that the Illuminati bankers would back his rise to power. As partners in the Sullivan and Cromwell firm, Allen and John Foster also represented I.G. Farben, the Rockefeller-Harriman-Warburg combination. [11]

Allen Dulles served with the U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS), a Round Table creation that would eventually become the CIA, and of which he would become head. In 1938, US president Franklin Delano Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, by agreeing to let the Special Operations Executive (SOE) control U.S. policies. To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General “Wild Bill” Donovan to London before setting up the OSS under the aegis of SOE-MI6. The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA, have since worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute. [12]

Miles Copeland, a former CIA operative specializing in the Middle East, revealed in his autobiography, The Game Player, that in 1951 and 1952 the CIA became interested in Nasser through a project known secretly as “The Search for a Moslem Billy Graham.” According to Copeland, who activated the project in 1953, the CIA needed a charismatic leader in order to divert the growing anti-American hostility that was dominant at the time. Copeland describes the first secret meeting he had with three army officers, including Major Abdel Moneim Ra’ouf, of Gamal Abdun Nasser’s inner circle.

In March 1952, Kermit “Kim” Roosevelt, grandson of President Roosevelt, who headed the CIA Near East Operations, had begun a series of meetings with Nasser that led to the coup four months later. When Nasser wanted to overhaul Egypt’s secret service, he turned to the CIA. However, the U.S. government “found it highly impolitic to help [Nasser] directly,” Copeland recalled in his memoirs, so the CIA instead secretly bankrolled more than a hundred Nazi espionage and military experts to train Egyptian police and army units in the mid-1950s. [13]

Allen Dulles turned to Reinhard Gehlen, the most senior eastern front military intelligence officer, who, just before the end of WWII, had turned himself over to the U.S. In exchange for his extensive intelligence contacts in the USSR, Dulles and the OSS, reunited Gehlen with his Nazi associates, to establish “the Gehlen Organization”, which then functioned within the OSS, and later the CIA. [14]

Gehlen handpicked 350 former German army and SS officers who were released from internment camps. That number eventually grew into 4000 undercover agents, called V-men. The more notorious of these henchmen included Gestapo captain Klaus Barbie, otherwise known as the “Butcher of Lyon”, Alois Brunner, Adolf Eichmann’s right-hand man in orchestrating the Final Solution, and Emil Augsburg, who directed the Wannsee Institute, where the Final Solution was formulated, and who served in a unit that specialized in the extermination of Jews. Another was the former Gestapo chief Heinrich Muller, Adolf Eichmann’s immediate superior, whose signature appears on orders written in 1943 for the deportation of 45,000 Jews to Auschwitz for killing.

By the early 1950s, Reinhard Gehlen was in charge of developing the new German intelligence service. To build Egypt’s spy and security forces, Gehlen hired the best man he knew for the job, former SS colonel Otto Skorzeny, who was described by the OSS, as “the most dangerous man in Europe”. It was Skorzeny who, at the end of the war, organized the infamous ODESSA network, the purpose of which was to establish and facilitate secret escape routes, called ratlines, out of Germany to South America and the Middle East for hunted members. With ties to Argentina, Egypt, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, and the Vatican, they operated out of Buenos Aires and helped Adolf Eichmann, Josef Mengele, Erich Priebke, Aribert Heim and many other war criminals find refuge in Latin America and the Middle East.

According to Nazi-hunter Serge Klarsfeld of Paris, it was the banking contacts of Francois Genoud that set in motion the ODESSA networks, which transferred millions of marks from Germany into Swiss banks. [15] According to European press accounts, Genoud was managing the hidden Swiss treasure of the Third Reich, most of which had been stolen from Jews. [16] Genoud later employed these funds to pick up the tab for the legal defense of Adolf Eichmann, Klaus Barbie, and Carlos the Jackal.

Genoud had traveled to Palestine on behalf of the Nazis, when Adolf Eichmann was providing financial assistance from the SS to al-Husseini, with whom he developed a lifelong friendship. It is also likely that Genoud had some part in al- Husseini’s escape from Europe, as he was a representative of the Swiss Red Cross at the end of the war. [17]

Through the same ratlines, Dulles also orchestrated an operation in Italy, known as “Stay-Behind”, to build a Europe wide secret network of anticommunist terrorists, who would fight behind the lines in the event of a Soviet invasion. The plan was later codified under the umbrella of the Clandestine Co-ordinating Committee of the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE), the military arm of NATO. US planners, worried over the growing influence of Italy’s large and popular communist party, organized the Stay-Behind network into what was called Operation “Gladio” in 1956. The name derived from the short sword used by Roman. In addition to the CIA, Gladio was also operated by the secret Masonic lodge “Propaganda Due”, also known as P2, headed by Licio Gelli, known as the “Puppet-master”. During the war, Gelli had been a member of Mussolini’s notorious “Black shirts”, and later acted as liaison officer to the Hermann Goering SS division. [18]

Also involved in the Nazi smuggling operations was George Herbert Walker, maternal grandfather of George H. W. Bush. Walker was president of Union Banking Corporation, a firm that traded with Germany, and helped German industrialists consolidate Hitler’s political power. Union Banking became a Nazi money-laundering machine. Walker helped take over North American operations of Hamburg-Amerika Line, a shipping line and cover for I. G. Farben’s Nazi espionage unit in the United States. Hamburg-Amerika smuggled in German agents, and brought in money for bribing American politicians to support Hitler. Also, a 1934 congressional investigation showed that Hamburg-Amerika was subsidizing Nazi propaganda efforts in the U.S. [19]

George H.W. Bush’s father, Prescott, was a board member of Union Banking, and a senior partner in a Union Banking affiliate, the investment firm Brown Brothers, Harriman. Both E.R. Harriman and Prescott Bush were members of Yale university’s Skull and Bones society, which was the dominant American chapter of the international Brotherhood of Death secret societies, that included Germany’s Thule Society, later the Nazis. The Bush family are descendants of several prominent English families, like the Pierces and the Groverners, who trace their descent to the Fisher King, Alain IV Duke of Brittany. [20]

However, the U.S. government investigated both Bert Walker and Prescott Bush, and under the Trading with the Enemy Act, seized all shares of Union Banking, including shares held by Prescott Bush, because “huge sections of Prescott Bush’s empire had been operated on behalf of Nazi Germany and had greatly assisted the German war effort.” [21]

The German chemical company I.G. Farben also directly financed Joseph Mengele’s experiments at Auschwitz. [22] In 1940-41, I.G. Farben built a gigantic factory at Auschwitz in Poland, to utilize the Standard Oil-IG Farben patents with concentration camp slave labor to make gasoline from coal. The SS, who were paid by Standard Oil funds, guarded the Jewish and other inmates and selected for killing those who were unfit for I.G. Farben slave labor. [23]

Mengele was among the hundreds of high-ranking Nazis which the US intelligence and military services extricated from Germany, during and after the final stages of World War II, known as Operation Paperclip. Of particular interest were scientists specialising in aerodynamics and rocketry, such as those involved in the V-1 and V-2 projects, chemical weapons, chemical reaction technology and medicine. However, Christopher Simpson shows how the CIA hired former Nazis “for their expertise in propaganda and psychological warfare,” and other purposes. [24]

According to the author of Mind Control The Ultimate Terror, it was through Mengele that the MK-Ultra and Monarch programs were developed. The project was begun in the 1950s, and coordinated by the British psychological warfare unit called the Tavistock Institute, with the Scottish Rite Freemasons, the CIA, and other British, American, Canadian, and UN agencies. [25] The Tavistock Institute, formed at Oxford University, London, by the RIIA in 1922, became the Psychiatric Division of the British Army during World War II. [26]

The plan was to employ the age-old indoctrination methods of the Ismaili Assassins, to continue to create mind-controlled agent-provocateurs, more commonly known as “terrorists”. In 1952, Dulles founded Banque Commerciale Arabe in Lausanne, Switzerland, representing a pact between the CIA and the Muslim Brotherhood, which is comprised of Saudi royal family members. [27] The bank was co-founded by a longtime British intelligence agent, Benoist Mechin, a protégé of Jack Philby. [28] Dean Henderson, author of Geopolitics: The Global Economy of Big Oil, Weapons and Drugs, summarizes the nature of this relationship:

Part of this Faustian bargain may have involved the House of Saud chieftains providing information to US intelligence on how to create mind-controlled assassins. The Muslim Brotherhood claims to have first perfected this technique during the 11th century Crusades when it launched a brutal parallel secret society known as the Assassins, who employed mind-controlled “lone gunmen” to carry out political assassinations of Muslim Saracen nationalists. The Assassins worked in concert with Knights Templar Christian invaders in their attacks on progressive Arabs, but were repelled. [29]

The ostensible reason for MK-Ultra, incepted by then director of the CIA, Dulles, in 1953, was to counteract the mind- control capabilities of the communists. This concern was largely based on the fact that U.S. prisoners captured during the Korean War were coerced into signing false confessions of crimes, and some had defected to North Korea, because of the effects of brainwashing. However, The Manchurian Candidate, a 1959 book, which was made into a movie in 1962, explains the true intended purpose. The film features a communist plot to use a U.S. soldier brainwashed in Manchuria to assassinate the leading U.S. presidential candidate. The CIA would employ the expertise of former Nazis in mind-control to program assassins for homegrown operations, but ultimately, members of Islamic fundamentalist groups to carry out acts of terrorism.

The Muslim World League

With Skorzeny now on the job of assisting Nasser, Egypt became a safe haven for Nazi war criminals. [30] Ultimately, the Free Officers coup was the work of many foreign intelligence agencies, though especially the British, French and American, in collusion with the Muslim Brotherhood. However, tensions eventually grew between the Free Officers and the Brotherhood. Nasser emerged in 1954, naming himself prime minister, and when his government moved towards a confrontation with the British, the Brotherhood was directed to wage war against him. To that effect, the Brotherhood received assistance from Israeli intelligence, for which reason, among others, it was accused by Al Ahram, and other Egyptian press, as being the tool of imperialists “and the Zionists”. [31]

So when Nasser threatened to nationalize the Suez Canal, so important as a conduit for oil cargo to Europe and elsewhere, the Rothschilds employed their assassins from the Muslim Brotherhood against him. The Rothschilds had maintained an interest in the canal, ever since Baron Lionel de Rothschild financed his friend’s Benjamin Disraeli’s purchase of the canal for the British government in 1875.

When Brotherhood members fired shots at Egyptian leader Gamal Abdun Nasser in 1954, the group was forcibly suppressed by the government, with thousands of members being imprisoned. Six of its leaders were tried and executed for treason, and many others were imprisoned. Interrogations revealed that the Muslim Brotherhood functioned virtually as a German Intelligence unit. As divulged by Copeland:

Nor was that all. Sound beatings of the Moslem Brotherhood organizers who had been arrested revealed that the organization had been thoroughly penetrated, at the top, by the British, American, French and Soviet intelligence services, any one of which could either make active use of it or blow it up, whichever best suited its purposes. Important lesson: fanaticism is no insurance against corruption; indeed, the two are highly compatible. [32]

The CIA also became concerned over his leanings towards the Soviet Union. Great Britain and the United States had originally agreed to help finance the first stage of the Nasser’s Aswan High Dam project. Although, in 1956, the U.S. secretary of state, John Foster Dulles, canceled the U.S. offer, and the next day Britain followed suit. Five days later, Nasser announced the nationalization of the Suez Canal, promising that the tolls Egypt collected would in five years pay for the dam.

In response to Nasser’s nationalization of the Canal, the United Kingdom and France, with the help of Israel, invaded the Sinai and much of Port Said, sending the Egyptian military into retreat. However, due to pressure from both the United States and the Soviet Union, the British and the French had to withdraw. Though Israel did achieve the cessation of Egyptian raids, Nasser was hailed as having achieved a victory for the Arab world.

Fleeing members of the Muslim Brotherhood were then shuttled to the CIA’s ally, Saudi Arabia. When John Loftus, a Justice Department official in the eighties, was permitted to peruse classified government documents, he discovered that the British Secret Service convinced American intelligence that the Arab Nazis of the Muslim Brotherhood would be indispensable as “freedom fighters” in preparation for the next major war, which was anticipated against the Soviet Union. Kim Philby, the Soviet agent who infiltrated the British Secret Service, and the son of “Abdullah” Philby, helped the US acquire these Arab Nazis, then being expelled from Egypt, who were afterwards sent to Saudi Arabia. There, according to Loftus, “they were given jobs as religion education instructors.” [33]

Thus, beginning in the 1960s, the Salafi became more formally allied to the Wahhabis, who became the principal patrons of the Brotherhood, which set up branches in most Arab states. With the CIA’s tacit approval, the Saudis provided funds for Brotherhood members who joined the anti-Nasser insurgency in Yemen in 1962. “Like any other truly effective covert action, this one was strictly off the books,” wrote Robert Baer, a nineteen-year veteran of the CIA, in Sleeping with the Devil. “There was no CIA funding, no memorandum of notification to Congress. Not a penny came out of the Treasury to fund it. In other words, no record.” Describing the Brotherhood as a “silent ally” that provided a “cheap no- American casualties way” to do “our dirty work in Yemen, Afghanistan, and plenty of other places,” Baer explained, “All  the White House had to do was give a wink and a nod to countries harboring the Muslim Brothers.” [34]

In 1962, with CIA encouragement, the Saudis established an organization called the Muslim World League. [35] Underwritten initially by several donors, including Aramco, then a CIA collaborator, the League established a powerful international presence, with representatives in 120 countries. [36] It was headed by then chief Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed ibn Ibrahim Al al-Sheikh, a lineal descendant of Mohammed ibn Abdul Wahhab, and the presidency remains vested in the Saudi Mufti to this day.

Included among its eight members were important representatives of the Salafi Muslim Brotherhood: Said Ramadan, son- in-law of Hasan al Banna, Maulana Abul Ala Maududi, leader of Brotherhood offshoot, the Jamati Islami of Pakistan, and Maulana Abul Hasan Nadvi, of India. “Moreover”, as Abul El Fadl describes,

...the proponents of Wahhabism refused to be labeled or categorized as the followers of any particular figure including ‘Abd al-Wahhab himself. Its proponents insisted that they were simply abiding by the dictates of alsalaf al-salih (the rightly-guided predecessors, namely the Prophet and his companions), and in doing so, Wahhabis were able to appropriate the symbolism and categories of Salafism. [37]

Nevertheless, as El Fadl mentions, “even with the formation of the Saudi state, Wahhabism remained a creed of limited influence until the mid-1970’s when the sharp rise in oil prices, together with aggressive Saudi proselytizing, dramatically contributed to its wide dissemination in the Muslim world. [38] This opportunity presented itself in 1967, when Israeli forces routed a coalition of Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, in the Six Day War. Israel then seized control of Jerusalem, the West Bank of the Jordan River, the Gaza Strip, the Sinai Peninsula, and the Golan Heights. In consequence, a summit of Arab leaders met, who resolved to employ their oil wealth to help confront Israel.

Go to Next Page

 

H F 507

 
 

HOW IT ALL STARTED IN 1694

 

After such disorientation was spread, Charles Montagu, treasurer, key leader of the Venetian Junto, and part of the welcoming committee of the foreign invaders, established the Bank of England in 1694 through an act of Parliament, which was founded by William Paterson, an imported student of the Bank of Amsterdam. Montagu then organized large loans through the private Bank, controlled not by the King, but parliament, and while supposedly helping the war torn economy, created a giant monetary debt out of thin air, a quantity for speculation and impoverishment of England, proceeding to push through dictatorial financial decisions for the economy, while never once issuing anything for development. For the job, Montagu selected the alchemist and calculating machine Isaac Newton, appointing him Warden of the Mint to carry out the enormous data processing job involved in the lying and faking on behalf of the numerous transitions in the economy for the sake of the Empire, such as a gruesome recoinage which cut the people’s wealth in half.20Newton immediately proffered his niece for sexual favors to Montagu in payment for the appointment, and for extra credit, as Warden of the Mint Newton personally advocated the death penalty and torture for petty thieves of coin wherever possible.

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 14-2015 9-2014

H F 505/1

 

THE BRAVE WOMAN

WHO DARES TO

SHATTER A VERY

TOXIC TABOO

by

BARONESS FLATHER

 

 

EXTRACT

BRITAIN can rightly take pride in its tolerant outlook. Indeed, it is this attitude that has helped build our remarkably successful multiethnic society, even as immigration has reached unprecedented levels.

But there is a danger that such tolerance sometimes degenerates into cowardly reluctance to tackle damaging social practices wthin certain ethnic minorities.

In political circles, the fear of accusations of

RACIAL PREJUDICE

can create a climate of denial, where hard realities are ignored and difficult truths become unsayable.

That is certainly what happened over the disgraceful sex-grooming scandal in Rotherham, in which the civic authorities, including the

POLICE AND SOCIAL SERVICES, tried to COVER UP the SYSTEMATIC ABUSE of more than 1,400 VULNERABLE GIRLS by PREDATORY GANGS of PAKISTANI HERITAGE MEN.

Similarly, for too long there was an institutionalised unwillingness to

CONFRONT THE SPREAD OF RADICAL EXTREMISM

Indeed, in 2007, after the Channel 4 made a programme about the influence of

HATE PREACHERS in BIRMINGHAM MOSQUES

the West Midlands Police urged that the producers be prosecuted for stirring up

RACIAL HATRED

But it is now time to confront another taboo subject, one that has been hidden from the public, despite the misery it causes to children and families.

[and to society as a whole]

I am referring to the outdated unBritish custom within the MUSLIM COMMUNITIES of marriage among close relatives, especially FIRST COUSINS. This tradition, which is followed mainly by migrant families from the Kashmir region of PAKISTAN , has tragic circumstances of causing disproportionate high rates of disability among offspring because of the far greater risks of

GENETIC DISORDERS...

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

 

ENGLAND

The present must be balanced on the wings of the past and the future, and that as you stretch out the one you stretch out the other to strength.' 

 Wordsworth

 

'WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.'

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

 

[THE PROOF OF THIS STATEMENT IN 2015 IS SHOWN IN MANY TOWNS AND CITIES IN OUR ONCE FAMILIAR COUNTRY BEFORE THE EU AND MASS IMMIGRATION FROM

FOREIGN CULTURES LEADING TO FOREIGN ENCLAVES

WITH THEIR BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 AND MORE IMMIGRATION FROM MUSLIM COUNTRIES  AND FROM  ELSEWHERE WILL UNLESS FIRM DECISIVE ACTION IS TAKEN NOW! WILL LEAD TO A FOREIGN TAKEOVER OF OUR COUNTRY WITHIN A FEW GENERATIONS . WE HAVE SEEN SOME EXAMPLES ON HOW THEY CAPITALIZE ON THEIR CUSTOMARY ELECTION TACTICS ONCE DESCRIBED BY A JUDGE INVESTIGATING ELECTION FRAUD IN A LABOUR CONSTITUENCY IN BIRMINGHAM AND WOULD FIT EVENTS RECENTLY IN

TOWER+HAMLETS

AS AN EXAMPLE OF A

BANANA REPUBLIC.  

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 JULY-2015

 

H F 506/1

 

SOFT EU RULES LET

 265,000 NON-EUROPEANS INTO UK WITH

 EU CITIZENSHIP

DAILY MAIL, Thursday, July 16,2015

HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of MIGRANTS have taken advantage of SOFT EU rules to move to Britain by the BACK DOOR.

Foreign nationals from outside Europe who would struggle to secure a UK visa have instead got EU CITIZENSHIP elsewhere. Under Brussels rules, they are then free to travel here and find a job. A report found the number of EU passport -holders born elsewhere who had settled nin the UK had tripled in a DECADE.

The University of London's Migration Observatory found there were 78,000 non-Europeans with EU citizenship in Britain in 2004, but by this year 2015 the number had reached

264,000

Last  night Lord Green of Deddington chairman of MIGRATION WATCH, said:

This increasing flow could become a BACK DOOR to BRITAIN,

This development strengthens the case for finding means of CONTROLLING ACCESS to the UK by EU migrants.

Of those living in the UK there were

54,000 with passports from Portugal.

36,000,from Italy

33,000, from France

30,000 from Spain.

The main countries of birth were

India with 24,000

South Africa with 15,000

US and Canada with 14,000

Brazil with 13,000

The figures were compiled using data from the Office of National Statistics quarterly Labour Force Survey

JULY 16,2015

[There are also those many immigrants from Kashmir who look for  their life partners  back in their village in their  homeland rather than integrate -which is itself a back door for further IMMIGRATION into the UK.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 505

 
 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967 DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

NADER LIBRARY.COM-

TERRORISM-ILLUMINATI

 

 

 

NEILKEENAN.COM

 

 

WHISTLEBLOWER.

ORG

DIVINECOSMOS.COM  

GLOBALRESEARCH.CA/CO

 

 

 

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 

 
 
 
 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

 

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.

+THE HISTORY OF THE MONEY CHANGERS

 KNOWN GOOD GUYS UNDER SUSPICION OF BEING PROVOCATEURS ON BEHALF OF THE ILLUMINATI.

As we have explained elsewhere it is this typical situation which we must fear the most and expect this insidious practice of the satanic ILLUMINATI who wish to ensure where possible that it is THEIR STOOGE in CONTROL! within their ENEMIES camp.  We suspect that there are many more within UKIP [-possibly even MEP's-one talking about a deal with the Conservative party ] and  BNP and other declared advocates across the political spectrum pursuing  FREEDOM! and NATION STATE! who will soon share the space below.

There are always great difficulty in these matters and one can only go on the actions and contacts of the individuals involved.

There can be no greater or more heinous crime imaginable than for one to betray the TRUST of a COMRADE fighting for a JUST! and GOOD CAUSE!

'It is said: 'No man can justly censure or condemn another, because indeed no man truly knows another'

But what we are considering is at a time when those who intend to destroy the majority of mankind and make serfs of the majority allowed to live and  It is a WAR we are FIGHTING for SURVIVAL! and in such circumstances a persons ACTIONS or lack of ACTION! are the ONLY basis on which one can JUDGE! another.

Finally it is up to the membership of UKIP and BNP to purge THEIR PARTY of the TRAITORS within and look for those who have the fire in their belly to carry the party forward to VICTORY!

 

MAY-2012

HOME

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

as well

This provides the twisted rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he continued to serve as President.

Dr Herzog's subversive remarks have special resonance for Britain, where

QUEEN ELIZABETH II

 is the

 SOVEREIGN AND CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD

of the

UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

She is the custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her father,  This was confirmed initially when the

QUEEN took the OATH of ACCESSION

and was finally solemnized at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognized and universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful

 SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH PEOPLE

In November 2000 -after a correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair; to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness Jay; and to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders and dignatories -asking:

Is Her Majesty the Queen Sovereign?

HE RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL

or else a non-committal weak, diversionary reply.

Mr Blair being unable to answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry  to the Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark of the

BLAIR GOVERNMENT

has been its Ministers' arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary questions.  Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point on occasion, of'

' standing the Queen up'

by failing to turn up on time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.

[Further details to follow]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

*

 

WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.

 

The position under English law, of course, is that Her Majesty remains Sovereign until the moment of her death, when sovereignty will pass automatically to the next rightful heir to the British Throne.  However, the Prime Minister's problem appears to be that since, under Article 17 of the Maastricht treaty, the Queen is a 'citizen' of the European Union, Her Sovereignty has been usurped.  Those UK Ministers and officials who permitted this scandalous state of affairs to develop are accordingly prima facie

TRAITORS

and ought to be indicted for

TREASON.

But so far as President Herzog of Germany has been concerned, his status as a 'citizen' of the

EU COLLECTIVE

appears to be entirely acceptable, because the EU is just a 'mask' for emerging

'GREATER GERMANY'.

When, following the correspondent's letters to selected leaders, an attempt was made by Christopher Gill MP in January 2001 to put down a question asking the Prime Minister whether

Her Majesty is Sovereign

the Table Office at the House of Commons replied in the following astonishing language:

'Last night you sought to table a question to the Prime Minister concerning the effect of the UK's membership of the

EUROPEAN UNION

on the constitutional position of

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN.

You will recall that I explained I would need to check the admissibility of the question with other colleagues before it could be tabled.  It has been pointed out to me that the question as drafted in effect seeks the Prime Minister's view in the interpretation of the law, in this case the

Treaties of the European Communities and associated European Treaties and UK legislation.

IT IS NOT POSSIBLE

to table questions to Ministers seeking interpretation of the , as this is a matter for the appropriate courts , not Ministers.'.

It would accordingly appear unclear whether

Her Majesty the Queen is Sovereign

-and by extension, whether any legislation passed by Westminster Parliament since  Britain made the mistake of joining the

EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

in

1972

is

VALID.

For evidently  until the matter is decided by the 'appropriate courts', the question of whether

HER MAJESTY IS SOVEREIGN

and thus able to act as

HEAD OF STATE

and hence give the

ROYAL ASSENT

to

LEGISLATION

passed by the

WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT

remains in the air.

This Kafkaesque situation reflects the fact that, as noted under the

COLLECTIVE TREATY

all residents of the

EUROPEAN UNION

 are its citizens; and the

QUEEN

is a resident of the

EUROPEAN UNION

THEREFORE

if

EU law

 

has precedence over

BRITISH LAW

the

QUEEN

 being an

EU citizen

is

NOT

SOVEREIGN.

 

*

 

It may be asked: Why does no British Government ever take steps to have this matter clarified?

There are two possible answers to this question:

(1)    If the matter were to be resolved and it were to transpire that, indeed, The Queen is not Sovereign, then all legislation to which Her Majesty has given the Royal Assent since Britain acceded to the EEC is

NULL and VOID
 

because she had no power to give the Royal Assent, Alternatively:

(2)    Successive UK Governments since the beginning of the collapse in 1970 have preferred this issue to remain unresolved because if it were to be concluded by 'the appropriate courts' that The Queen is Sovereign, then correspondingly all EU legislation in the UK

is

NULL and VOID

because it is presupposed that EU law has precedence over UK law.

which cannot be the case if The Queen is Sovereign.

By contrast, if it does transpire the

The Queen is not Sovereign, then, certainly all legislation passed since Britain joined the EEC is indeed called into question.

Either way -whether The Queen is or is not Sovereign -the logic of the above leads to the conclusion that all EU law may be invalid in the United Kingdom.

Thus the the real reason this key issue has never been clarified is that the British Government's deceitful EU 'coup d' etat by installments'  policy would be exposed as illegal if the issue were ever to be addressed in the COURTS.  Furthermore, as reveiwed on page 209, the Treaty of Rome was reportedly

NOT SIGNED

-so the basis of all EU law throughout the

EU COLLECTIVE

may be open to

LEGAL CHALLENGE

on that ground alone.

It is concluded that EU law may have no standing in the United Kingdom and that successive conniving UK Governments have been

SHIRKING THIS CENTRAL ISSUE.

 

In an article published in The Times of London on 27th April,1996, Karl Lamers, whio was then foreign affairs spokesman for the Christian Democrats in the Bundestag, condescended to recognise that 'British doubts are deeply rooted.

The British concern is about the destruction of the national identity and the nation state, which is seen by the British as the only legitimate expression of the popular will.   Germans, by contrast, say that there has long been a supranational reality created by our European civilisation.  Common problems spawn common interests; our vital interests are identical

Whereupon Herr Lamers delivered a further broadside in Germany's psychological warfare offensive designed to help the stupid British to abandon their love of national sovereignty, which it is the central purpose of the European Union to

COLLECTIVISE:

'The  Euro-optimists take as their starting point the objective external reality.... The Eurosceptics (in Britain) deal with the inner, subjective reality of the consciousness of the British people.  It is if you like , the forces of Logic pitied against the forces of Psycho-logic.  It must be the task of democratic politics to help narrow this gap.  Otherwise politics will cease to be effective.  A community makes sense if it can begin to solve its existential problems.

If the nation state can no longer do that by itself, its failure undermines its political legitimacy'.

In other words, Britain had no right to continue existing as a nation state, and it must be 'brought to reason' so that it comes to full acceptance of German prescriptions and intentions without further. tedious prevarication

Note that, for Herr Lamers, the Pan-German position was 'logical', whereas the perceived British tendency to 'cling' to the nation state was 'psychological'. Once again here, the truth was turned upside-down.

The essence of Germany's continuing, updated strategy to realise the Germans, has never been in doubt - not least, since the German legislature adopted several amendments to the Basic Law (constitution) on 22nd December, 1992, in order to legalise' ratification of the Maastricht Treaty.  A new Article 23 was incorporated, the previous one having been repealed by the Unification T of 31st August 1990. The revised Article known as the 'ARTICLE on EUROPEAN UNION'. contains the following:

 

With a view to establishing a Unite Europe, the Federal republic of Germany shall participate in the development of the European Union, which is committed to democratic[?], rule of law, social and federative principles as well as to the principle of subsidiarity, and ensures protection of basic rights comparable in substance to that accorded to the Basic law

To this end the (German) Federation may transfer sovereign powers by law with the consent of the Bundesrat. The establishment of the European Union , as well as amendments to its statutory foundations and comparable foundations which amend or supplement the content of this Basic Law or make such amendments and supplements possible shall be subject to the provisions of paragraph (2) and (30 of Article 79.........

THIS MEANS that Germany can extend its sovereignty into Moravia and Bohemia, as provided for under the secret accord reached between President Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl in Geneva , in 1990

As for Dr Professor Herzog, he faced both ways at the 1997 Konigswinter Conference, held in Berlin. In a welcoming speech, he suggested that 'Britons and Germans can build on common values, convictions and interests.  the debate on Europe can only reach a fruitful conclusion - that is to say, a conclusion acceptable to the German strategy elite- if we help gain acceptance for one idea, namely that the 'Europe of-Fatherlands' is possible.  The European nations can be Fatherlands and still integrate' 

 

 

[TO BE CONTINUED]

*

 

 

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy -

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

 -contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

 

 

SEPTEMBER-2008

*

 

TO ASSIST YOUR SEARCH WE HAVE INCLUDED THE LINKS BELOW

 

EUROPEAN UNION Q & A

1 EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10] VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]     100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007]

33]    BLAIR'S LAST TREACHEROUS ACT. THE 60,000 DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHAT WILL MR BROWN DO?-JUNE-2007]

34]   GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

35]  HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

36]  SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS
 

37]   NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007-CLOSER TO YOUR HOME THAN YOU THINK  

38]    A WARNING FROM JAN-2005-TO PRESERVE THE NATION-STATES OF EUROPE-VOTE 'NO' TO THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION (D.T.)

49]    SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU. (D.M.)

 

[For hundreds of bulletins about the EU]

HOME

 

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

*

IS SENATOR RON PAUL- ILLUMINATI?

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

MAY-2012

Race Strife Traced to Century-Old Illuminati Plan

July 17, 2015

rriot.jpg
A 1912 book exposes Illuminati Jewish war against white race.

 
The riots in Baltimore MD and Ferguson MO., the shootings in Charleston NC, and the burning of Negro Churches, etc. can be traced to a long-term Illuminati Jewish program to foment racial strife in America.  

 

Anti-Communist Jew, Myron Fagan reveals this program, and Dan (comment below) shows that George Soros is financing recent racial division.  (You can Illuminati are also behind Muslim shooters.)





By Henry Makow Ph.D.
(from June 13, 2013)

Wikipedia will tell you that the book "A Racial Program for the 20th Century" (1912) is another anti-Semitic hoax. It says the book and author Israel Cohen didn't exist.

The reason for this lie? This book contains a famous passage that reveals the  Illuminati-Communist race strategy, later applied to women and other minorities in the guise of "feminism" and "diversity":


"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavour to instil in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause."

Rep. Thomas Abernathy read this passage into the Congressional Record on June 7, 1957 (Vol. 103, p. 8559, top of page.) Wikipedia tells you Abernathy read the quotation in a letter to the Editor of the Washington Star, and the newspaper subsequently determined it was a hoax and apologized. "The quotation has retained some popularity among racists and anti-Semites to this day," Wikipedia chortles.

I have subsequently added this line to the Wiki entry: "However, the author fits the description of Israel Cohen (1879-1961) a prolific Zionist author who wrote the Foreword to Israel Zangwill's "The Schnorrers" as well as 30 other books. Like many purported "hoaxes," the quotation does describe events as they subsequently unfolded and the operations of the US Communist Party."  This information was removed.

Cohen was the General Secretary of the World Zionist Organization. If this is the same Cohen, it means Zionism and Communism were identical. 

MYRON FAGAN

"International" Jews, like other globalists, serve the Rothschilds' sick megalomaniac program of world government dictatorship. "National" Jews, like other patriots, owe their first loyalty to their country and fellow citizens. Like Benjamin Freedman, Myron Fagan (1887-1972)   fought the bankers' Communist agenda for the best part of his life.

fagan1.jpgMyron Fagan, a successful Broadway playwright and director, met Israel Cohen, Israel Zangwill and George Bernard Shaw at a party to celebrate the opening of  Zangwill's play The Melting Pot in 1910. He knew the three men to be founders of the Fabian Society. Cohen told Fagan he was planning to write "A Racial Program for the 20th Century" as a "humanitarian" follow up to "The Melting Pot."  At the time, Fagan didn't realize that the play, which described how Jews and Blacks triumph against White prejudice, was pure propaganda, part of the Communist campaign of fostering "guilt" in white Liberals described above.

It all fell into place in 1957 when Fagan read the Washington Star quotation in the context of the debate over school desegregation. In 1966, he recalled:

"That book was published in 1913 ... the NAACP and the ADL were created [by the bankers] almost simultaneously to carry out those directives. That was more than a half-century ago. Can there be any doubt that that was intended to launch our present Negro upheaval for a Black Revolution?

roof1.jpeg(left, Dylan Roof)


 
"If that isn't enough evidence, in 1935, the Communist Party's 'Workers Library Publishers' issued a pamphlet entitled 'THE NEGROES IN A SOVIET AMERICA.' It urged the Negroes to rise up, especially in the South, and form a Soviet State in the South, and apply for admission into the Soviet Union ... it contained implicit assurance that the 'revolt' would be supported by all American Reds, and on page 38 it promised that a Soviet government would confer greater benefits on Negroes than on Whites and that 'Any act of discrimination or prejudice against a Negro will become a crime under the Revolutionary law ...

" ... When Abernathy published that Israel Cohen excerpt in the Congressional Record, we (Cinema Educational Guild, Inc.) promptly issued a 'News-Bulletin' in which we published the entire story -- and warned of the coming Negro uprisings...

"Two years went by and nobody even tried to deny the matter, but, suddenly, after two years, during which the ADL and similar groups had ferreted out ALL copies of the book and destroyed them, they announced that the whole thing was a fraud, that there never had been such a book, or an 'Israel Cohen' ...

Why did they wait two years? And how could they deny the existence of a writer named Israel Cohen in the face of all the books he had written? Copies of which I have. More important, bear in mind that Israel Cohen had been a prime mover in all 'Fabian Socialist' and Communist movements in England -- also that I had met him in person when he actually discussed the book at that banquet."


Related:

Myron Fagan - 1967: A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century   8 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhFJafQ4pCY
 
Myron Fagan exposes the Illuminati/CFR [1967]  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrUXPn7HCjM                     2 hours 32 minutes

Plus, here's David Carroll pointing out the irony that a white female NAACP leader passing herself off as black is nothing new for the organization created and funded by white liberals and political Jews 
In defense of NAACP's Rachel Dolezal 
      21 minutes

(Willie Martin, A Darker View of the Issue 
Fagan Outs the Illuminati CFR
On line books by Myron Fagan

  See also my "Communist Takeover Began Long Ago"

and "Red Rose Parks-
Fabricating an American Icon" 

 
 
 First Comment from Dan: Soro's Funding the Race War

 
We can only hope the people who've fallen for it will snap out of it, now that the bag man of Arab Spring and Ukraine's 'Orange Revolution' has been funding these riots. 

 
The visual stunts may have already fulfilled their purpose.  One goal certainly was to induce guilt and self depreciation in white teens and college students - perhaps the first white generation that didn't have it.   Simultaneously to induce persecution complex into the first black generation that didn't have it. 

 
"Trending" on college campuses now is "white privilege workshops", "three days of mostly white male bashing, asking women and minorities to communicate their many problems with men and whites, and particularly white men. No solutions were offered. Uninspiring."  

 

http://www.wsj.articles/white-people-review-lets-talk-about-race-or-not-1437085200

 

 

H F 505/2

 

 
 

 

 

FINAL WARNING:

A HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

 


CHAPTER FOUR

 BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY

Table of Contents

[In the following article many names may be known to you and for more details go to:

JEW WATCH

The British East India Company was a British commercial and political organization established in India in the late 1600's, which was known as the Governor and Company of Merchants of London. A forerunner of this group was the London Mercers Company, and earlier than that, the London Staplers. The organization traced their lineage back to the ancient commercial groups involved in trading between the Mediterranean and India. They were closely related to the Levant Company, and the Anglo-Muscovy Company, and spawned the London Company, which was chartered in 1606 to establish the Virginia Plantation on a communistic basis, and the Plymouth Colony in 1621.

It was mainly organized for trading, but soon became an agent for British imperialism. Bending to government pressure, they reorganized in 1702. Every year, 24 Directors were elected by the Court of Proprietors (or shareholders, a majority of which were English Masons). They traded in cotton, tea, silk, and salt peter; and were accused of dealing with opium and participating in the slave trade. They virtually monopolized all trade from South India, the Persian Gulf, Southeast Asia and East Asia.

Indian policy was influenced by the company from 1757 to 1773, when their power was broken by the 1773 Regulatory Act, and Pitt's India Act of 1784, finally ending their monopoly in 1813. When they ceased to exist in 1873, many of its shareholders were major financiers. The principals of this group perpetuated their elitist goals by establishing the Fabian Society.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

 

THE FABIAN SOCIETY

On October 24, 1883, in London, a group of 17 wealthy Socialists gathered to discuss a 'Fellowship of the New Life', which was based on the writings of scholar Thomas Davidson, who hoped to start some sort of monastic order. The group included George Bernard Shaw(1864-1926), a free-thinking Marxist-atheist writer whose plays contained socialistic references, an ideology he pursued after hearing a speech by American economist Henry George in 1882, and reading Marx's Das Kapital; Graham Wallas, a classical scholar; Sidney James Webb(1859-1947), a civil servant who was the most influential socialist in the country; Edward Pease; Havelock Ellis; Frank Podmore; Annie Besant; John Galsworthy; R. H. Tawney; G. D. H. Cole; Harold Laski; Israel Zangwi11(1864-1926), a Jewish playwright and novelist, who in 1910, wrote the play The Melting Pot, which was a propaganda play showing how Americans discriminate against Blacks and Jews; and Israel Cohen, a Jewish writer. Some of these people were also members of the Society for Physical Research, an organization dedicated to spiritualism research, which was founded in 1882.

 

Sidney Webb later founded the London School of Economics in 1895, [This is the same body which has been funded by LIBYA'S Leader GADDAFI over the past five years up to 2011 with many lucrative oil contracts for Rockefeller and others]  which today is a branch of the University of London. Among itsmajor contributors: the Rockefeller Foundation, the Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, and Mrs. Ernest Elmhirst, the widow of J. P. Morgan partner Willard Straight, who founded the socialist magazine New Republic. In 1912, Webb established an independent journal called The New Statesman, and later became a leader in the Labor Party, writing Labor and the Social Order in 1918. He held several political offices. He was a disciple of John Stuart Mill, who served as the Secretary of the British East India Company.

 

On November 7, 1883, this group met to discuss the establishment of an organization "whose ultimate aim shall be the reconstruction of Society in accordance with the highest moral possibilities." However, they split into two factions, and on January 4, 1884, one of the factions established a group known as the Fabian Society. On January 25th, one member, J. G. Stapleton, delivered their first lecture, called "Social Conditions in England, With a View to Social Reconstruction or Development." At a time when there were 30,000 Socialist voters, after a few weeks, they had only 20 members.

 

In April, 1884, their first publication was distributed - a four-page pamphlet called Why Are We Poor? In May, journalist George Bernard Shaw (who would win the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1925) joined, and soon became the leading figure of the Fabians. In March, 1885, Sidney Webb, then a clerk from the Colonial Office, joined; and in 1886, so did Graham Wallas. Shaw, Webb, Wallas, and Sidney Olivier became known as the "Big Four."

 

The other faction, known as "The Fellowship", continued for 15 years under Davidson, with members such J. Ramsey MacDonald (who later became Prime Minister), Edward Carpenter, and Havelock Ellis.

Their pamphlet Facts for Socialists in 1887, maintained that any person who knew the facts of Socialism, had no other choice but to be one. It was their best selling piece of propaganda.

In 1884, John W. Martin and Rev. W. D. P. Bliss moved to Boston (MA), and established a magazine known as The American Fabian. The move was an unsuccessful effort to bring the Fabian's socialistic movement to New York, Philadelphia, San Francisco, and Chicago.

 

By 1889, 6500 tracts had been distributed, and 31 speakers had delivered 721 lectures. From 1891-92, there had been 3,339 lectures given by 117 Fabian members. Their membership rose to 400 by 1892, 681 in 1894, and 881 in 1899. They had 74 local chapters in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, South Africa, Spain, Denmark, and Germany.

In 1899, The Fabian Essays, the most noted work on socialism, was written by seven influential members of the Society, and edited by Shaw. It became the blueprint for socialistic legislation, and was later reprinted in 1908, 1920, 1931, and 1952.

 

Fabian leaders were drawn to Herbert George Wells(1866-1946), and his ideas of the "New Republic" which he described as "a sort of outspoken Secret Society... an informal and open freemasonry," made up of the educated class, whose common goals would lead to the creation of a new world state, thus saving the human race from disaster. Known as the 'Prophet of Our Time' because of writing about many things before they came to be, in books like The Time Machine and War of the Worlds; Wells would give the Fabians the notoriety they needed. Edward Pease, Secretary of the Fabians, wrote to H. G. Wells on January 10, 1902, to say that Webb and his wife Beatrice, were the "pioneers of your New Republic."

Sponsored by Wallas and Shaw, Wells joined them in February, 1903. In his first lecture after joining, he said that the World State was a necessity. In his 1905 book, A Modern Utopia, he wrote of the World State taking control and creating a "sane order," and how they maintained a central records system in Paris, which they used to keep track of every person on Earth, and aided the state to eliminate the unfit.

 

H. G .Wells [1984] was unimpressed with the Fabians, and called for expansion, by raising money, getting new offices, appointing a new staff, and relaxing the guidelines for membership. He wanted to initiate an all-out propaganda campaign, and outlined his views in a paper called The Faults of the Fabians, which dealt with the need for reorganization, and why he wanted to change their name to the "British Socialist Society." His views were not shared by the Fabian inner circle, and in September, 1908, he handed in his resignation.

 

H. G .Wells [1984} maintained his socialistic views, and in 1928, wrote The Open Conspiracy: Blueprints for a World Revolution, which was an elaboration of ideas from his 1926 book The World of William Clissold, which gave a seven-point program for the development of the "new human community", which was inspired by the rise of communism. These ideas had been fleshed out in his 1897 short story A Story of the Days to Come, and his 1901 book, Anticipations of the Reaction to Mechanical and Scientific Progress Upon Human Life and Thought. The character, Clissold, had called his project for world revolution, the "open conspiracy", which meant "the establishment of the economic world-state by the deliberate invitation, explicit discussion, and cooperation of the men most interested in economic organization, men chosen by their work, called to it by a natural disposition and aptitude for it, fully aware of its importance and working with the support of an increasing general understanding...It is not a project to overthrow existing governments by insurrectionary attacks, but to supersede them by disregard. It does not want to destroy them or alter their forms but to make them negligible by replacing their functions. It will respect them as far as it must. What is useful of them it will use; what is useless it will efface by its stronger reality; it will join issue only with what is plainly antagonistic and actively troublesome." His plan was to be accomplished by "an intelligent minority...without the support of the crowd and possibly in spite of its dissent..."

 

The Open Conspiracy was  H. G. Wells perspective of his New Republic, which represented a classless World State that controlled everything. Its establishment would be accomplished by "functional men, men of high natural intelligence and professional competence, who performed the creative and managerial work of the world." They were recruited from "the men and women whose knowledge, skill, creative gifts made them indispensable to modern society" who would "gradually have the reins of power into their hands." The revolution was to begin through the "formation of small groups of friends, family groups, groups of students and employees or other sorts of people meeting and conversing frequently in the course of normal occupations. " They were to " enlarge themselves and attempt to establish communications with kindred groups for common ends."

 

He further elaborated: "The Open Conspiracy will appear first, I believe, as a conscious organization of intelligent, and in some cases wealthy men, as a movement having distinct social and political aims, confessedly ignoring most of the existing apparatus of political control, or using it only as an incidental implement in the stages, a mere movement of a number of people in a certain direction, who will presently discover, with a sort of surprise, the common object toward which they are all moving. In all sorts of ways, they will be influencing and controlling the ostensible government."

"From the outset, the Open Conspiracy will set its face against militarism," in the sense that they will encourage "refusal to serve in any war (as conscientious objectors ) ...For the furtherance of its aims, the Open Conspiracy may work in alliance with all sorts of movements and people...(and) restricted movements will attend only to a portion of its program."

 

Through "branching and development...the Open Conspiracy as consisting of a great multitude and variety of overlapping groups, but now all organized for collective political, social and educational as well as propagandist action.

They will recognize each other much more clearly than they did at first and they will have acquired a common name...The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed. It will have become a great world movement as widespread and evident as socialism and communism. It will largely have taken the place of these movements. It will be more, it will be a world-religion. This large loose assimilatory mass of groups and societies will be definitely and obviously attempting to swallow up the entire population of the world and become the new human community."

 

Two years later, in a published article titled "The Banker", H. G .Wells  [1984]  even included the international banking houses in Clissold's "open conspiracy" through a three-point program that would by-pass governments by negotiating agreements stabilizing the currency, adjusting credit availability to control the fluctuation of business, and the withdrawal of credit to governments or armament industries who instigate an arms race.

It is obvious that H. G .Wells [of 1984 fame] either based his writings on the actual plans of the Fabian elitists, or used his knowledge of what they had already done in order to formulate a theory of what they were going to do in the future. Since he did quit, were these writings meant to be an expose or warning; or was he just stating facts, daring people to try and stop them. We don't know his intent, but what we do know, was that he was incredibly prophetic in his description of their methods. It would indeed be a "blueprint" for the manner in which the Illuminati would entrench itself in our governmental affairs.

 

Edward Bernays, former head of CBS-TV, and a friend of H. G. Wells, wrote in his 1928 book, Propaganda: "As civilization becomes more complex, and as the need for invisible government has been increasingly demonstrated, the technical means have been invented and developed by which public opinion may be regimented. With printing press and newspaper, the telephone, telegraph, radio and airplanes, ideas can be spread rapidly, and even instantaneously, across the whole of America." These tools would be fully utilized to begin the destruction of America.

 

 

The secret goal of the Fabian Society, was to create a godless, classless, socialistic society that was dedicated to the ultimate victory of Socialism, which really meant - Communism. In 1891, they became affiliated with the Second Socialist International (established in 1889), and helped establish a Democratic Socialist state in Great Britain.

[See: KGB-DESTABLISING CHART]

The aims of the Fabian Society was developed by Webb, from what Englishman John Ruskin(1819-1900) taught at Oxford University. Ruskin, a teacher at the Working Men's College (founded in 1854 by Christian-Socialist philosopher J. F. D. Maurice), a professor of Fine Arts at Oxford, an artist and writer, based his views on those of Socialist Robert Owen. He advocated a utopian society, and espoused theories developed from the teachings of Plato(428-347 BC), who studied under Socrates, and became the greatest philosopher in history. Plate established an academy which operated for 800 years, producing many great men, including Aristotle. In his work, The Republic, he outlined his ideal society, which was an aristocratic society ruled by the elite. It included the elimination of marriage and the family, and introduced selective breeding by the government, who would destroy all inferior offspring. In Plate's utopia, sexual equality dictated that women would fight alongside the men in times of war.

More!

[See: KGB-DESTABLISING CHART]

 

Shaw (whose mistress, Florence Farr, was a witch in the Order of the Golden Dawn), revealed that their goal was to be achieved by "stealth, intrigue, subversion, and the deception of never calling socialism by its right name." In fact, that's how they got their name. The name originated from the Roman Consul, General Quintus Fabius Maximus, the Cunctator ( " Delayer " ) , who through patient, cautious, delaying and elusive tactics, during the early phases of the Second Punic War(218-201 BC), enabled the Roman army to regroup and defeat Hannibal's stronger Carthaginian army.

[CORRUPTION OF THE YOUNG]

The Fabians were working towards a new world, by indoctrinating young scholars who would eventually rise to power in various policy-making positions throughout the world; by infiltrating educational institutions, government agencies, and political parties. Their strategy was called the "doctrine of inevitability of gradualism," which meant that their goals would be gradually achieved. So gradual, that nobody would notice, or "without breach of continuity or abrupt change of the entire social issue." The secret was evolution, not revolution, or what Webb called "permeation." One good example of this concept is television. Ever since Bible reading and prayer has been taken out of schools, the entertainment industry has been slowly and methodically taking bolder steps in the content of their programming. We are seeing things being televised, which would have never been considered thirty years ago. Nudity done in "good taste", or done to be culturally or historically accurate, is acceptable. Obscene language is tolerated (especially on the radio), if it is an essential part of the plot. Even though the level of sex and violence is increasing, the rate of complaints to the television networks is decreasing. This shows a gradual acceptance on the part of the public, or what the network bosses call the "relaxing of moral standards." This was done to brainwash our children to constantly bombard them with trash that would influence them, and turn them away from God. This is so evident with the concept of music videos, which have been able to combine sex and violence along with a hard driving musical composition that has been shown to ferment rebellion in young people.

 

In 1905, American Fabians established the Rand School of Economics in New York City. On September 12, 1905, five of the Fabians met at Peck's Restaurant in New York's Lower Manhattan: Upton Sinclair (well-known author and socialist), Jack London(well-known fiction writer), Rev. Thomas Wentworth Higginson (a Unitarian minister), J.G. Phelps Stokes, and Clarence Darrow (legendary lawyer). They incorporated the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, for the purpose of promoting "an intelligent interest in socialism among college men and women," and established chapters at Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, New York University, and the University of Pennsylvania. Their true purpose was to begin de-Christianizing America. One of its founding members, was John Dewey, the father of progressive education, whose philosophy consisted of "atheism, socialism and evolution." In 1921, they changed their name to the League for Industrial Democracy, whose purpose was "education for a new social order based on production for use and not for profit." They established a network of 125 chapters. Dewey would later serve as its Vice-President, and in 1941, its President.

 

The Fabians had broken away from the Liberal Party in the 1890's and contributed to the founding of the Labor Representation Committee, which in 1906, became the Labor Party. Shaw called for "wire-pulling" the government in order to get Socialist measures passed. In 1918, the Labor Party adopted a program which implemented the ideas of

 

Fabianism.

 

In 1931, the New Fabian Research Bureau was organized, joining the Fabian Society in 1938 to form a reorganized group. In 1940, the Colonial Bureau of the Fabian Society was established; and in l941, the Fabian International Bureau was formed, which catered to international issues.

 

  CLICK  Startpage

 

ROTHCHILD

In December, 1942, the Fabians published the Beveridge Report, written by Sir William Beveridge (later made a Lord), who promised the Britons the world, if they would accept his package of social reforms. In 1945, Fabian Socialists took control of the House of Commons, on the strength of the Report, and the Parliamentary Reforms, which had been published eleven years earlier by Sir Ivor Jennings.

 Within a few years, British industries and services were nationalized and put under government control, including Rothschild's Bank of England, which only meant that the Rothschilds were able to control more, because now, all banks were forced to use Bank of England notes, instead of their own.

 

At its peak in 1946, the Fabian Society had 8,400 members in 80 local chapters. Among their members: Bertrand Russell (philologist, mathematician and philosopher), (Pandit) Motilal Nehru (father of India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharial Nehru, and leader of the Independence movement who founded the Swaraj, or "self-rule" Party), and Ramsey MacDonald (Prime Minister of England in 1924, 1929-35). Nearly half of all Labor Party representatives of the Parliament in the House of Commons, were members, along with most Party leaders.

 

Today, from their headquarters at 11 Dartmouth Street, in London, they spread their ideas among teachers, civil servants, politicians, union officials, and other influential people. They publish the Fabian Journal and the Fabian News magazine. They also hold meetings, lectures, conferences, and seminars; do research in political, economic, and social problems; and publish their findings and views in magazines, books and pamphlets. Their concentration has been mainly on reforms to social services and the nationalization of industry.

 

THE ROUND TABLE

 

Cecil Rhodes(1853-1902, South African financier, British statesman and industrialist, who wanted to make Africa a "British dominion from the Cape to Cairo"), with the financial support of Nathaniel Mayer Rothschild(1840-1915) and Alfred Belt, was able to control the diamond mines of South Africa with his DeBeers Consolidated Mines Limited by buying out the French Diamond Co. and then merging with the Barnato Diamond Mining Company, He eventually controlled the production of diamonds throughout the world. His Consolidated Gold Fields, was also a prosperous gold mining operation. He made $5 million annually.

 

CECIL RHODES

In 1877, while still studying at Oxford (it took him 8 years because of having to run the diamond mines), he wrote the first of seven wills, in which each became a separate and legally binding document. It called for the establishment of a "secret society with but one object- the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilized world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States, (and) for ...making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire." Frank Aydelotte, a founding member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and the American Secretary to the Rhodes Trustees, wrote in his book, American Rhodes Scholarships: "In his first will Rhodes states his aim still more specifically: 'The extension of British rule throughout the world...the foundation of so great a power as to hereafter render wars imposs ible and promote the interests of humanity. " When he died , his third will, drafted in 1888 , called for the establishment of a trust, run by his son-in-law Lord Rosebury, a Rothschild agent, to administer his fortune. His seventh, and last will, named Rothschild the administrator of his estate, and established an educational grant known as the Rhodes Scholarships at Oxford University (which was controlled by the Fabians).

 The Scholarships provided a two-year program for young men, and later, women, from the United States, United Kingdom and Germany, to carry on the Illuminati conspiracy.

 

Among the Rhodes Scholars: Dean Rusk (former Secretary of State), Walt Whitman Rostow, Sen. J. William Fulbright (AR), Harlen Cleveland, Nicholas Katzenbach, Sen. Frank Church, Sen. Bill Bradley (NJ), Sen. David Boren (OK), Sen. Richard D. Lugar (IN), Sen. Larry Pressler (SD), Sen. Paul Sarbanes (MD), Rep. Elliot H. Levitas (GA), Gov. Bill Clinton (AR, now of course, our President- he didn't graduate), Gov. Richard Celeste (OH), Supreme Court Justice Byron "Whizzer" White, Charles Collingwood ( TV commentator) , Howard K. Smith ( TV commentator), George Jerome Goodman (writer known as "Adam Smith"), Brig. Gen. Pete Dawkins, Pat Haden (former quarterback of the Los Angeles Rams), Kris Kristofferson ( songwriter/singer/actor ), Rep. Carl Albert (OH, former Speaker of the House), Hedley Donovan (former Editor-in-Chief of Time magazine, later a senior advisor to President Carter), Rep. John Brademas (IN, later New York University President), Gen. Bernard W. Rogers (Supreme Commander of the NATO forces in Europe), Stansfield Turner (CIA Director under Carter), Robert Penn Warren (Pulitzer Prize-winning poet and novelist, best known for his book All the King's Men).

  CLICK  Startpage

 

GLOBALISM

The Rhodes fortune, through the Rhodes Scholarship Fund, has been used to promote the concept of globalism and one world government. Up to 1953, out of 1,372 American Rhodes Scholars , 431 had positions in teaching and educational administration, 31 were college presidents, 113 had government positions, 70 held positions in the media, and 14 were executives in foundations.

 

JOHN RUSKIN

Rhodes began developing his philosophy after hearing a speech by John Ruskin(1819-1900) in Christ Church at Oxford University, which espoused an opinion, which by extension, furthered the teaching found in Plate's Republic. Plate called for: "...a ruling class with a powerful army to keep it in power and a society completely subordinate to the monolithic authority of the rulers." Rhodes was also greatly influenced by Windom Reade's book The Martyrdom of Man, published in 1872, which advocated Darwinism and the tremendous suffering that man must undergo, which was epitomized in the phrase "the survival of the fittest." The book said that the "inevitable progress of man (was) to perfection." Rhodes incorporated this rationalization into his thinking. Rhodes talked about starting an organization to preserve and extend the British Empire. He said in 1877: "It is our duty to seize every opportunity of acquiring more territory...more territory simply means more of the Anglo-Saxon race, more of the best, the most human, most honorable race the world possesses...the absorption of the greater portion of the world under our rule simply means the end of all wars." It was this mentality that fueled his desire to unite the world under one form of government. Using the Jesuits and the Masons as organizational models, Rhodes, Rothschild agent Lord Alfred Milner(1854-1925); other Ruskin associates at Oxford such as Arnold Toynbee, Arthur Glazebrook, Sir George Parkin, Philip Lyttleton Gell, Sir Henry Birchenough; and a similar group at Cambridge, led by social reformer and journalist William T. Stead, which included, Lord Reginald Baliol Brett, Sir John B. Seeley, Lord Albert Grey, and Edmund Garrett; joined together to form a secret group, on February 5, 1891.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

LORD MILNER

There was an Inner Circle, known as the "Circle of Initiates", led by Rhodes, and included an Executive Committee with Stead, Brett, and Milner, the chief Rhodes Trustee; and other members like Lord Arthur Balfour (British Foreign Secretary who wrote to Rothschild promising his support for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine), Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild, Sir Harry Johnston, and Lord Albert Grey. The Outer Circle was known as the "Association of Helpers", but was not implemented until 1909-1913, when Milner established it as the Round Table organization. Their goal was to eventually establish a one-world government, which would be controlled by the international banking community, under the cloak of socialism. They saw England, not as a European power, but as an Atlantic power, and wanted to have a federation of the English-speaking world, which would be controlled by them.

 

PILGRIM SOCIETY

In 1897, British and American elitists met in order to come up with ways to accomplish Rhodes' plan to consolidate their respective governments, which would pave the way for a one-world government. On July 24, 1902, a secret organization known as the Pilgrim Society was started in London. Six months later, an American branch was established in New York. Funded by the Rhodes Foundation, they were instrumental in taking control of the Democratic Party in the United States.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

ROUND TABLE

While he was Governor-General and High Commissioner of South Africa from 1897- 1905, Milner began to recruit young men, mostly from Oxford and Toynbee Hall, to help run his Administration. They became known as Milner's Kindergarten. With his backing, they were able to get jobs in influential positions in government and finance, where they became a dominant force in England's domestic and foreign policy. Between 1909-1913, Milner (one of the most influential men in the political and financial circles in England), Lionel Curtis, Philip H. Kerr (Lord Lothian), and Sir William S. Marris used this group to establish semi-secret discussion and lobbying groups, known as Round Table Groups, in England; the main British dependencies, South Africa, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and India; and the United States. They were all controlled from England, and maintained contact through personal correspondence , frequent trips, and a quarterly journal begun in 1910, called The Round Table. The membership consisted of men who not only had a vast amount of political clout, but some who served in the highest levels of the British government.

Though they are still generally referred to as the Illuminati, from this point on, the Round Table would be the group responsible for perpetuating the conspiracy to establish a one-world government. Members of the Round Table have also been referred to as the "Committee of 300", or the "Olympians".

  CLICK  Startpage

 

J. P. MORGAN

Most members had private fortunes, or were known financiers, however, it was the fortunes of Rhodes, Alfred Beit(1853-1906, the German financier from Frankfurt), Sir Abe Bailey(1864-1940), and the Astor Family, that formed the core of their financial support. Since 1925, substantial contributions have come from the Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, J. P. Morgan, the Rockefeller and Whitney families, and associates of Lazard Brothers Bank and Morgan, Grenfell and Company (the London affiliate of Morgan).

  CLICK  Startpage

 

ROUND TABLE

The Round Table controlled the London Times newspaper, which was owned by the Astor Family, as well as publications in other countries.

 

Milner led the group until his death in 1925, when the leadership was taken over by Lionel Curtis, and then by Lord Robert H. Brand( brother-in-law of Lady Astor) until he died in 1963, when the leadership was passed to Adam D. Marris, the son of Sir William, who was promoted to succeed Brand as managing director of Lazard Brothers Bank.

 

  CLICK  Startpage

 

LIONEL GEORGE  CURTIS

Lionel George Curtis(1872-1955), the British High Commissioner to South Africa and Secretary to Sir Alfred Milner, advocated British imperialism, and the establishment of a World State. He believed that "men should strive to build the Kingdom of Heaven here upon this earth, and that the leadership in that task must fall first and foremost upon the English-speaking peoples." In 1919, he established a front organization for the Round Table, known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, which until 1961, was headquartered at Chatham House (and is sometimes referred to as the Chatham House Study Group) in Ormond Yard. From 1919-1927, there was an Institute of International Affairs started to cover all the Round Table Groups in the British dependencies, and the United States (where it is known as the Council on Foreign Relations), which was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company who controlled a small American Round Table Group. They were funded by Sir Abe Bailey and the Astor Family. Today you'll find the Institute des Relations Internationales in Belgium, the Institute for International Affairs in the Netherlands, the Institute for International Affairs in Rome, the Norwegian Institute for Foreign Affairs, the French Institute of International Relations, the Australian Institute of International Affairs, and many others.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

In the spring of 1918, a group of people met at the Metropolitan Club in New York City to form the Council on Foreign Relations. The group was made up of "high- ranking officers of banking, manufacturing, trading, and finance companies, together with many lawyers...concerned primarily with the effect that the war and the treaty of peace might have on post-war business." The honorary Chairman was Elihu Root, a Wall Street lawyer, former New York Senator, former Secretary of War under McKinley, former Secretary of State under Theodore Roosevelt, member of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1912), and the most recognized Republican of his time. From June, 1918 to April, 1919, they held a series of dinner meetings on a variety of international matters, but soon disbanded.

 

In the fall of 1917, a group called 'The Inquiry' was assembled by Col. Edward M. House to negotiate solutions for the Paris Peace Conference in Versailles. They worked out of the American Geographical Society doing historical research, and writing position papers. The Inquiry was formed around the inner circle of the Intercollegiate Society, which was a group of American socialist-oriented intellectuals.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

PRESIDENT WILSON

House, President Wilson's most trusted advisor, who was an admirer of Marx, in 1912, anonymously wrote the book Philip Dru: Administrator (published by Fabian B. W. Huebsch), which was a novel that detailed the plans for the takeover of America, by establishing "socialism as dreamed by Karl Marx," and the creation of a one-world totalitarian government. This was to be done by electing an American President through "deception regarding his real opinions and intentions." The book also discussed the graduated income tax, and tax-free foundations. The novel became fact, and Philip Dru was actually House.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

ROTHCHILD

On May 30, 1919, Baron Edmond de Rothschild of France hosted a meeting at the Majestic Hotel in Paris, between The Inquiry (including members: historian George Louis Beers, who later became the U.S. representative for the Round Table; Waiter Lippman; Frank Aydelotte; Whitney H. Shepardson; Thomas W. Lament; Jerome D. Greene; Col. Edward House; Dr. James T. Shotwell; Professor Archibald Coolidge; Gen. Tasker H. Bliss, the U. S. Army Chief of Staff; Erwin D. Canham of the Christian Science Monitor; and Herbert Hoover (who, when he was elected to the Presidency in 1928, chose CFR member Henry L. Stimson to be his Secretary of State), which was dominated by J. P. Morgan's people, and the Round Table (including Lord Alfred Milner, Lord Robert Cecil, Lord Eustace Percy, Lionel Curtis, and Harold Temperley), to discuss a merger. They met again on June 5, 1919, and decided to have separate organizations, each cooperating with the other.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS

On July 17, 1919, House formed the Institute of International Affairs in New York City, and the Inquiry became the American branch of the Round Table. Their secret aims were "to coordinate the international activities and outlooks of all the English-speaking world into one...to work to maintain peace; to help backward, colonial, and underdeveloped areas to advance towards stability, law and order, and prosperity, along the lines somehow similar to those taught at Oxford and the University of London..."

  CLICK  Startpage

 

COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

The short-lived Council on Foreign Relations , and the Institute of International Affairs, both supporters of Wilson, strongly supported the League of Nations. However, the Round Table wanted to weaken the League by eliminating the possibility of collective security in order to strengthen Germany, and isolate England from Europe so an Atlantic power could be established, consisting of England, the British Dominions, and the United States. In 1921, when it became apparent that the United States wasn't going to join the League, the Council on Foreign Relations was incorporated on July 21, consisting of members from both groups, and others who had participated in the 1919 Paris Peace Talks. The name change was made so that the American branch of the Round Table would appear to be a separate entity, and not connected to the organization in England.

 

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) became the American headquarters for the Illuminati. Led by House, who wrote the Charter, they were financed by Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff, William Averell Harriman, Frank Vanderlip, Bernard Baruch, Nelson Aldrich, J. P. Morgan, Otto Kahn, Albert H. Wiggin, Herbert H. Lehman, and John Rockefeller.

 

The membership of the CFR was mainly made up from the 150 members of House's task force which worked on the Peace Treaty. Many were associates of the J. P. Morgan Bank. The first Board consisted of the seven who were on the Merger Committee: Whitney H. Shepardson (Executive Secretary), George W. Wickersham (Chairman, Wall Street lawyer, Attorney General for President Taft), Frank L. Polk (Wall Street banker, Undersecretary of State), Paul Warburg, William R.Shepherd (president of Columbia University), Edwin F. Gay (Secretary-Treasurer, who later became the editor of the New York Evening Post which was owned by CFR member Thomas Lament, who was a senior partner of J. P. Morgan and a financial advisor to President Wilson), and Stephen P, Duggan (director of the International Education Board); plus nine others: John W. Davis (President, former Ambassador to Great Britain, former Democratic Congressman from West Virginia, who later became chief counsel for J. P. Morgan & Co., Rockefeller Foundation trustee, and also a Democratic candidate for the Presidency in 1924), Elihu Root (Honorary President), Paul D. Cravath (Vice President, NY lawyer), Archibald Cary Coolidge (Harvard historian), Isaiah Bowman(director of the American Geographical Society), Norman H. Davis (NY banker, former Undersecretary of State), John H. Finley (associate editor at the NewYork Times), David F. Houston (former Secretary of Treasury), and Otto Kahn (NY banker). Other members included: J. P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Edward M. House, Christian Herter, Jacob Schiff, Averell Harriman, Nelson Aldrich, Bernard Baruch, Owen D. Young, Russell C. Leffingwell, John Dulles, Allen Dulles, James T. Shotwell, Professor Charles Seymour, Joseph Chamberlain, Philip Jessup, Philip Moseley, Grayson Kirk, Henry M. Wriston, Arthur H. Dean, Philip D. Reed, John J. McCloy, and Walter Lippman (founder of the Intercollegiate Socialist Society).

  CLICK  Startpage

 

ALL SOULS COLLEGE OXFORD

Where All Souls College at Oxford University was the base for Round Table operations in England; the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton University, established by Abraham Flexner of the Carnegie Foundation and Rockefeller's General Education Board, was the center of activities for the American branch.

 

CARNEGIE ENDOWNMENT

AND

FORD FOUNDATION

Their membership grew from 97 in 1921, to 210 in 1922. In 1927, they began to receive funding from the Rockefeller Foundation, and later the Carnegie Endowment and Ford Foundation, in addition to the financial support they got from J. P. Morgan and the Wall Street banking interests. By 1936, their membership reached 250, and they already had a lot of influence on five American newspapers: The New York Times, New York Herald Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, The Washington Post, and the Boston Evening Transcript. This gave them the ability to slant the news in a way which would reflect their views, and thus begin the process of molding America to suit their needs.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

COMMITTE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

In 1937, the CFR came up with the idea for "Committees on Foreign Relations", which would be established in various major cities around the country, for the "serious discussion of international affairs by leading citizens in widely separated communities." Between 1938 and 1940, Francis P. Miller organized these mini-Councils with funding from the Carnegie Corporation, to better influence thinking across the country. John W. Davis said after World War II that these committees had "provided an avenue for extending the Council to every part of the country." These CFR subsidiaries were established in 38 cities: Albuquerque, Atlanta, Billings, Birmingham, Boise, Boston, Casper, Charlottesville, Chicago (the most prominent), Cleveland, Denver, Des Moines, Detroit, Houston, Indianapolis, Little Rock, Los Angeles, Louisville, Miami, Nashville, Omaha, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Portland (ME), Portland (OR), Providence, Rochester, St. Louis, St. Paul-Minneapolis, Salt Lake City, San Francisco, Santa Barbara, Seattle, Tampa Bay, Tucson, Tulsa, Wichita, and Worcester.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

COUNCIL OF FOREIGN RELATIONS

The CFR has always claimed to be a private organization that doesn't formulate any government policy, in fact, the following disclaimer appears on their books: "The Council on Foreign Relations is a non-profit institution devoted to the study of the international aspects of American political, economic, and strategic problems. It takes no stand, expressed or implied, on American policy." From the beginning, their goal was to infiltrate the government, and that was done. Actually, they were so successful, that today, the CFR practically controls both domestic and foreign policy.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

PRESIDENT FRANKLIN D ROOSEVELT

President Franklin D. Roosevelt had Henry Wallace (Secretary of Agriculture) and Louis Douglas (Director of the Budget Bureau) work with a CFR study group on national self-sufficiency, out of which came the Export-Import Bank and the Trade Agreements Act of 1934.

 

On September 12, 1939, after the start of World War II, CFR members Hamilton Fish Armstrong (editor of Foreign Affairs) and Walter H. Mallory (Executive Director), went to the State Department and met with Assistant Secretary of State George S. Messersmith (CFR member), to offer the services of the Council by establishing a CFR study group concerning the war and a plan for peace which would make recommendations to the State Department. They proposed to do research, and make informal recommendations in areas regarding national security and economics. Secretary of State Cordell Hull, and Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles (CFR member) liked the idea, and the War and Peace Studies Project was initiated with funding from the Rockefeller Foundation, who gave grants of $300,000 over a 6 year period.

Under that umbrella, there were 5 study groups, each with 10-15 men and a full-time paid secretary. All together, between 1940-45, there were 100 people involved, with 362 meetings, producing 682 documents, and meeting regularly with state Department officials.

War and Peace Studies Project

Norman H. Davis (Chairman)

Waiter H. Mallory (Secretary)

Peace Aims: Hamilton Fish Armstrong

Territorial: Isaiah Bowman (President of Johns Hopkins University, geography expert)

Armaments: Allen W. Dulles (international corporate lawyer) , Hanson W. Baldwin (military correspondent for New York Times)

Political: Whitney H. Shepardson (corporate executive who was House's secretary at the 1919 Versailes Peace Conference)

Economic & Financial: Alvin H. Hansen (professor of political economy at Harvard), Jacob Viner (professor of economics at University of Chicago)

More!

In December, 1941, at the urging of the CFR, the State Department created the 14-member Advisory Committee on Post-War Foreign Policy, in which the CFR was represented by eight of its members(2 more became members later). The core of the group was Cordell Hull, Sumner Welles, Norman H. Davis, Myron C. Taylor( corporate executive ) , Isaiah Bowman and Leo Pasvolsky (economist) , all of whom were CFR members, with the exception of Hull, and were known as the "Informal Political Agenda Group" which Roosevelt called his "post-war advisers." They controlled the Committee , and were assisted by a research staff financed and controlled by the CFR. In order to formulate a closer liaison between the CFR and the Advisory Committee, the Research Secretaries from the War and Peace Studies were brought into the State Department as consultants to the corresponding subcommittee of the Advisory Committee. The Committee had their last general meeting in May, 1942, and all work from then on occurred at the subcommittee level.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

 

IMF & WORLD BANK

As World War II came to an end, CFR study groups planned the reconstruction of Germany and Japan, the establishment of the United Nations, the initiation of the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank (the UN International Bank for Reconstruction and Development). In December, 1943, the CFR began to outline their proposal for the United Nations, which was presented at the Dumbarton Oaks Conference. Historian Ruth B. Russell wrote in her 1958 book A History of the United Nations Charter: The Role of the United States, 1940- 1945, that "the substance of the provisions finally written into the (UN) Charter in many cases reflected conclusions reached at much earlier stages by the United states Government." In 1945, the CFR moved into their present headquarters at the Howard Pratt Mansion, which was largely financed by Rockefeller; and the study groups disbanded, with the men in those groups taking their place in the forefront of national affairs. For instance, Allen Dulles, former President of the CFR, was appointed director of the CIA; and John Foster Dulles, became Eisenhower's Secretary of State. Senator Barry Goldwater would later say: "From that day forward the Council on Foreign Relations had placed its members in policy-making positions with the federal government, not limited to the State Department."

In 1945, Sen. Arthur K. Vandenberg, a leading Republican, and a CFR member, traveled around the country to drum up support for the creation of the United Nations. He was also instrumental in getting the Republican-controlled Congress to go along with Truman's CFR-controlled foreign policy. When the UN Conference met in San Francisco in 1945, there were 47 CFR members in the U. S. delegation, including Alger Hiss(a State Department official and communist spy, who in 1950 was convicted of perjury after denying he had passed secret documents to the Russians, and was sentenced to five years in prison), Harry Dexter White (a communist agent), Owen Lattimore (who was called by the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee, a "conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy"), Nelson Rockefeller, John Foster Dulles, Dean Acheson, Harold Stassen, Ralph Bunche, John J. McCloy, Adlai Stevenson, Philip Jessup, John Carter Vincent (identified as a "security risk"), Edward R. Stettinius (Secretary of State), Leo Pasvolsky, Joseph E. Johnson, Clark M. Eichelberger, and Thomas K. Finletter.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

 

LIONEL CURTIS

In 1925, Lionel Curtis, established the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR) in 12 countries, in order to steer America towards Communism. The Round Table finger organization was financed by the Rockefeller Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and the Ford Foundation. The American branch received funding from Standard Oil, Vacuum Oil, Shell Oil, International General Electric, Bank of America, National City Bank, Chase National Bank, International Business Machines, International Telephone and Telegraph, Time Magazine, and J. P. Morgan.

The IPR was led by Professor Owen Lattimore, head of Johns Hopkins University School of Diplomacy, who, during a 1951-52 investigation of the IPR, was identified as a Soviet operative. The Senate found the group to be "a vehicle toward Communist objectives." Men from the IPR(who were all communist or pro-communist) were placed in important teaching positions, and dominated the Asian Affairs section of the State Department. After a four-year battle, their tax exempt status was revoked from 1955-1960.

Their publications were used by the armed forces, colleges, and close to 1,300 public school systems. They published a magazine called Amerasia, whose offices had been raided by the FBI, who found 1,700 secret documents from various government agencies, including the Army and Navy, that were either stolen, or given to them by traitors within the State Department. The Senate Internal Subcommittee concluded that the American policy decision which helped establish Communist control in China (by threatening to cut-off aid to Chiang Kai-shek unless he went communist), was made by IPR officials acting on behalf of the Soviet Union. Besides Lattimore, they also names Laughlin Curry(an Administrative Assistant to the President, who was identified as a Soviet agent by J. Edgar Hoover), Alger Hiss, Joseph Barnes, Philip Jessup, and Harry Dexter White, as Communist sympathizers. While he was Assistant Secretary of Treasury, Harry Dexter White provided Russia with the means of printing currency. He became Director of the International Monetary Fund in 1946, but resigned in 1947, when Whittaker Chambers accused him of being pro-communist, which he denied. In November, 1948, after White's death, Whittaker produced five rolls of microfilmed documents, which included eight pages of U.S. military secrets which had been written by White.

After World War II, the CFR was able to expand its study programs with grants of $1.5 million from the Ford Foundation, $500,000 from the Rockefeller Foundation, and $500,000 from the Carnegie Endowment.

Pro-communist Cyrus Eaten, Sr., a recipient of the Lenin Peace Prize, established the "Joint Conferences on Science and World Affairs", also known as the "Pugwash Conferences", in 1945 to gather intellectuals from across the world, to exchange information on ways to push America towards disarmament. The group was financed by the CFR, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation. In 1959, a disarmament proposal developed by the CFR, and discussed at the Conference, became the basis for Kennedy's disarmament policy in September, 1961.

In Study No. 7("Basic Aim of U. S. Foreign Policy"), published by the CFR in November, 1959, they revealed their plans for the country: "The U. S. must strive to build a new international order...(which) must be responsive to world aspirations for peace...(and) for social and economic change...including states labeling themselves as 'Socialist'..(and to) gradually increase the authority of the UN." They also advocated secret negotiations with Russia concerning disarmament, and increased foreign aid to China.

The foreign policy of the CFR seemed to mirror that of the U. S. Communist Party, only because a change to a socialistic form of government would bring them that much closer to a one-world government.

[See: KGB-DESTABLISING CHART]

  CLICK  Startpage

 

THE CFR ELECTS NIXON

The career of Richard M. Nixon began in 1946, when, backed by Eastern Establishment money, he came out of obscurity to defeat incumbent Congressman Jerry Voorhis in California, who was anti-Federal Reserve. Voorhis wrote in a pamphlet called Dollars and Sense: "...the representatives of the American people in Congress should speedily proceed to transfer the ownership of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks from the private ownership of the member banks to the ownership of the nation itself."

 

In 1952, Nixon and Earl Warren, then the Governor of California, helped create an Eisenhower majority within a California delegation that had been leaning towards Robert Taft, an anti-communist. Nixon was rewarded by being selected as the Vice- President, while Warren was named to the Supreme Court.

During the 1960 Republican Convention, Nixon, the Republican nominee, left Chicago and flew to New York, where he secretly met with Nelson Rockefeller. A subsequent news release indicated that Rockefeller had requested the meeting, when in fact Nixon had. The result of the meeting was the Fourteen Points of the "Compact of Fifth Avenue", which injected Rockefeller's socialistic plans into the Platform of the Republican Party.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

JOHN F KENNEDY

After losing to Kennedy, Nixon ran for Governor in California, but lost to Pat Brown in 1962. He left his law practice, and moved to New York, where he worked as a partner in the law firm of John Mitchell, who was Rockefeller's personal attorney. He lived in an apartment at 810 Fifth Avenue, a building owned by Rockefeller. He was a CFR member from 1961-65, and it was during this time that Nixon rebuilt his political career.

 

On November 22, 1963, the citizens of Dallas, Texas, found in their Dallas Morning News an unsigned leaflet titled "Wanted for Treason". At the top was John F. Kennedy's picture, and a list of reasons for the accusation. It was later discovered that it had been drafted at a Pepsi-Cola "convention" in Dallas, by lawyers of the Rockefeller law firm of Nixon, Mudge, Rose, Guthrie, and Alexander, to be used as an attack on Kennedy during the 1963 Presidential campaign. There is more than one Kennedy Assassination researcher who feels that Nixon had prior knowledge of Kennedy's shooting, though no hard evidence has ever come to light.

 

While it is widely accepted that there was a conspiracy behind Kennedy's death, as the volumes of evidence prove, there has never been a single group pinpointed as the mastermind of such a plan. The complexities involved in such a cover-up, certainly point to the Illuminati, because they are the only group in the world, operating behind the scenes, who would be able to influence and control all the elements necessary to pull off something like this. His murder was carried out publicly, because they wanted the political leaders in this country to know who was in control. There has been a phenomenal amount of research done on the case of President Kennedy's murder, and it almost seems that when he died, the tide changed in this country.

The forces behind the assassination of Kennedy were able to change the course of history at will, and with the new-found confidence at their success, the power they gained, literally allowed them to exert complete control over American government.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

ILLUMINATI

One fact that linked the Illuminati to the Kennedy conspiracy, was the oil connection. Huge oil fields had been discovered off the coast of Vietnam in 1950, and Rockefeller was able to use oil as a ploy to ferment a fear that Vietnam would be lost to Communism, the way Cuba was. However, Kennedy wanted to end American involvement in the war, and in October, 1963, he recalled 1,000 so-called advisers. He planned to bring home all American soldiers by 1965. After Kennedy was eliminated, the U. S. government escalated the war in Vietnam. His hatred of the CIA was well-known. After the Bay of Pigs disaster, he said he wanted "to splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds." Using a federal statute, Kennedy was going to force J. Edgar Hoover, the aging Director of the FBI, to retire, because he wanted somebody who better represented his New Frontier. Conservative in his economics, he intended to circumvent the Federal Reserve by issuing nearly $5 million in non-interest bearing U.S. bank notes(Executive Order #11110), much like Abraham Lincoln. And to top matters off, after winning the showdown with Russia over Cuba, he signed a limited nuclear test ban treaty with the Soviets. Needless to say, Kennedy's agenda was contrary to the plans for a New World Order. As Jacqueline Kennedy was getting ready to leave Air Force One when it arrived in Washington, still wearing the bloodstained clothing from Dallas, she said: "I want them to see what they have done." A very strange comment to make, since Oswald was already in custody.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

ROBERT KENNEDY

In 1968, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy promised an honorable end to the Vietnam War, and with Martin Luther King, Jr. delivering the Black support, Kennedy would have been easily elected President. That however, did not fit into the plans of the Illuminati, who wanted to prolong the war, and wanted Nixon to be President, because he represented the instrument that would perpetuate their goals. Again, there is plenty of evidence that points to a conspiracy in the assassinations of Bobby Kennedy, and King. The likelihood that the same forces were involved is evident, because again, the course of the nation was altered to fit into their plans.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

PRESIDENT NIXON

The Illuminati didn't want Nixon elected in 1960, and to insure that he wasn't, Eisenhower told the country that he couldn't think of a single thing that Nixon had done to help, during the eight years of his Administration. That comment, and his haggard appearance during the debates, were the two things that kept him from being elected. However, now in 1968, the responsibility of moving the country closer to socialism, and towards a one-world government, was put upon his shoulders. Former Secretary of the Navy, William Mittendorf, Finance Chairman of Nixon's 1968 campaign, said that at 5:30 AM on the morning after Nixon's election victory, Nelson Rockefeller and William Rogers went to Nixon's room to help select his Cabinet.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

 

HENRY KISSINGER

He appointed Mitchell, his campaign manager, to be his Attorney General. He appointed Henry Kissinger to be his Secretary of State, even though Kissinger's views were the complete opposite of his own. In reality, the Kissinger appointment was urged by Nelson Rockefeller, so the Illuminati could control U. S. foreign policy. At the beginning of each of his terms, Nixon offered the post of Treasury Secretary to David Rockefeller, but he refused it. It was Nixon who chose George Bush, the former Texas Congressman, to be the Chairman of the Republican Party, after Bush lost the Senate race to Democrat Lloyd Bentsen in Texas; and later appointed him to be the Ambassador to the U. N., the Ambassador to China, and the Director of the CIA.

In his 1971 State of the Union Address, Nixon said: "We in Washington will at last be able to provide government that is truly for the people. I realize that what I am asking, is that not only the Executive Branch, but even the Congress will have to change by giving up some of its power." Three days later, he announced that the country was being divided up into ten federal districts, and in February, 1972, he signed Executive Order #11647, which gave the government the power to accomplish that division. The Ten Regional Councils, a direct extension of the Executive Branch, have, since 1972, been getting control of local, county, and state governmental functions, through federal loans. Nixon told ABC news correspondent Howard K. Smith, that he was "Keynesian in economics." This was a reference to John Maynard Keynes, the English economist and Fabian socialist, who said he was promoting the "euthanasia of capitalism." Even though his policies had already indicated it, Nixon was basically saying that he was a Socialist.

In the early 1970's, things began to go sour for Nixon. It was the establishment newspapers, the Washington Post and the New York Times who forced a third-rate burglary onto the front pages, and turned Watergate into a major media event, which forced President Nixon to resign from office. As more and more facts come out, it is quite obvious that Watergate was a move by the Illuminati to get rid of an uncooperative President.

Watergate actually can be traced back to 1956, when Nixon's brother, Donald, received a secret loan from Howard Hughes. It proved to be embarrassing when it surfaced during the 1960 Presidential election. Nixon vowed revenge against the Democrats, and later discovered that Democratic Party Chairman Lawrence F. O'Brien had been secretly retained by Hughes. Nixon sent a memo to Chief of Staff H. R. Haldeman, in January, 1971, to get his Special Counsel Charles Colson to get the proof so that they could expose him, It was believed that the second break-in at the Democratic National Committee on June 16-17, 1972, was to retrieve any derogatory information the Democrats had on the Republicans, but it was later revealed that the main goal was to place a bug on the frequently used phone that was in the area of the DNC that had the offices of R. Spencer Oliver, his secretary, and Chairman of the State Democratic Governors organization,

In March, 1974, financier Robert Vesco told CBS's Walter Cronkite in an interview, that six months before Watergate, a group had come to him who "were going to attempt to get initial indictments of some high officials using this as a launching board to get public opinion in their favor and using the press media to a great degree. The objective was to reverse the outcome of the public election." There had been an article in the Washington Post pertaining to a secret contribution to the Republican Party, and this group of Democrats had went to him, seeking more information to use against Nixon. The three people that Vesco dealt with, "were names that everyone would recognize (who) held extremely high posts in past Administrations." Vesco told New York Times writer Neil Cullinan, that Watergate was intentionally created to stop Nixon.

Nixon aide Bruce Herschenson said that the Watergate plot was deliberately sabotaged "by a non-elected coalition of power groups." Former CIA agent, James W. McCord, Jr., the security chief for the Committee to Re-elect the President, has been accused of being a double agent, used to bring Nixon down by sabotaging the break-in at the Watergate Hotel.

There is evidence to believe that the police had been tipped off on the night of the break-in. Detective Lt. Carl Shoffler, and three other officers, who usually went off duty at midnight, just happened to stay on for the next shift, and were parked just a minute away from the hotel complex. When the security guard Frank Wills found the tape on the door, and called the police, the officers came immediately to arrest the White House "plumbers" (Special Investigations Unit). To top it off, McCord and Shoffler were friends.

McCord had entered the Watergate while it was still open, and put some tape on one of the doors so it wouldn't lock. The tape was put on horizontally, so that it could be seen between the doors. When the "plumbers" arrived hours later, instead of the doors being open, they were locked, which indicated that the piece of tape had been discovered. They left, since there was no longer any assurance of a successful operation. McCord told them to go back and pick the lock, since the police had not been called. E. Howard Hunt and his Cuban accomplices, did this, and left tape on the door for McCord to get in. About five minutes later, he joined them. He was supposed to remove the tape from the door, but he didn't, however, he told the other "plumbers" that he did. He also instructed them to shut-off their walkie-talkies, so the static wouldn't be heard, which means they were inside the office without being able to hear any outside communications taking place. They were caught, when Wills discovered the door taped for a second time.

Afterward, on March 19, 1973, McCord wrote a letter to Judge John J. Sirica, which turned the Watergate affair into a national crisis, by saying that Attorney General John Mitchell was involved, that campaign money was used to pay the "plumbers", and that the White House was trying to blame the CIA, when in fact the White House had engineered the entire operation, and Nixon covered it up. This came after Nixon held a press conference to say: "There is no involvement by the White House."

In the twenty years since Watergate occurred, one simple fact seems to have emerged, and that is, that Nixon probably had no prior knowledge of the break-in. White House Counsel John Dean III ordered it and "deceived the President of the United States into joining a conspiracy to obstruct justice in order to cover up a crime that Nixon had not committed."

  CLICK  Startpage

 

 

GENERAL ALEXANDER HAIG

If it wouldn't have been for the discovery of the Watergate tapes, Nixon may very well have survived the scandal. Gen. Alexander M. Haig, Jr., an aide to National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger, who later became Nixon's Chief of Staff, controlled the vault where the tapes were kept, and secretly made copies of the transcripts available.

Haig became Cyrus Vance's (CFR member, Secretary of the Army, later Deputy Secretary of Defense under Robert McNamara, who was also a CFR member) assistant in 1962. After a short tour of duty in Vietnam in 1966, where he was decorated for bravery, he was made a full colonel in 1968. He transferred to West Point to assist Commandant Gen. Andrew Goodpaster (CFR) for two years, after which Goodpaster recommended Haig to Kissinger in 1969, and Haig was put on the National Security Council. In less than a year, he was promoted to general, and in two more years, to major-general. Although he had served only four months as a battalion commander, and one month as a brigade commander, in 1972, he was given four stars, and nominated for Army Vice Chief of Staff. It was said, that 183 other generals, who were more deserving, were passed over. Ford would later promote him to Supreme Allied Commander in Europe. He resigned in 1979 because he was critical of Carter's defense and foreign policies. He became the chief operating officer of United Technologies, only to return to government for 18 months as Reagan's Secretary of State. Haig was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

WASHINGTON POST

John Dean claimed that "Deep Throat", the man who leaked information to Bob Woodward of the Washington Post, was Alexander Haig. Haig denied it. Woodward had claimed that he didn't meet Haig until 1973, however, it has since been revealed that prior to Woodward becoming a reporter, he was a lieutenant in the Navy, and as a special briefing officer, had contact with Haig at the National Security Office in the White House. It now appears that Haig had a huge role in bringing Nixon down.

So why did the Illuminati turn against Nixon? In addition to the previously mentioned economical changes, he infuriated Kissinger by bombing North Vietnam without consulting anyone. It was even rumored that Nixon was planning to get rid of Kissinger. However, Kissinger was the Illuminati's man in the White House, and his job was to control Nixon, so he was running the show.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

HENRY KILLINGER

Some very interesting information surfaced about Henry Kissinger. In 1961. Col. Gen. Michael Goleniewski, of Polish Intelligence, defected to the United States, bringing with him 5,000 pages of secret documents, 160 microfilms of secret reports, 800 pages of Russian intelligence reports, plus the names of hundreds of Soviet agents in American and Europe. State Department Security Officer, John Norpel, Jr., testified before the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee that the information provided by Goleniewski was never proven to be inaccurate, and Goleniewski was honored by the 88th Congress for his efforts.

More!

The documents indicated that after World War II, Russia established an ODRA spy ring in Poland to infiltrate British and American intelligence. The GZI, Polish Intelligence, discovered that one communist agent, code-named "Bor", had worked with another agent, Ernst Bosenhard (a clerk at the U.S. Intelligence Headquarters in Oberammergau, Germany), who had been sending secret documents to Moscow. Bosenhard was convicted of espionage in 1951. "Bor" returned to the United States, and was secretly working with the Central Intelligence Agency, and teaching at Harvard University. "Bor" was identified as Sgt. Henry Alfred Kissinger. He became a consultant on security matters during the Administrations of Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson. Kissinger, who had been Nelson Rockefeller's chief advisor on foreign affairs, in his book White House Years, called Rockefeller, "the single most influential person in my life." His book, Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, in 1957, established him as the leading authority on U.S. strategic policy. He initiated the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT). There should be little doubt where his allegiances are in regard to his support of one-world government.

This story took on additional meaning, when in 1965, former CIA Chief of Research and Analysis, Herman E. Kimsey, used fingerprint, dental and medical records, handwriting analysis, blood tests, and interviews with childhood friends and relatives to reach a conclusion that Goleniewski was actually Aleksei Romanoff, the son of Nicholas II, who survived the alleged Communist massacre of the Russian Royal family. The Bolshevik government had claimed to have captured the seven members of the Russian Imperial family, which included the Czar, his wife, son, and four daughters, and murdered them in the basement of the Ipatiev house in Ekaterinburg, dumping their bodies in a nearby abandoned mine. No bones were ever found there (however, it 1998 it was revealed that remains have been found in another location which have been tested to see if they match the DNA of living descendants).

In 1970, documents released by the British Government revealed that President Wilson backed a secret mission to Russia that resulted in the rescue of the Czar and his family who were smuggled out of Russia in the back of trucks, and then taken by ship to Europe where they have lived since 1918. The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk between Russia and Germany, which was signed on March 3, 1918 to end hostilities between them, was said to also contain a codicil that guaranteed that the Romanov's would not be harmed. The Russian people were to continue believing that they were dead, so the communists could replace the monarchy. It had been hoped that the Bolshevik government wouldn't survive, so they could return, but it never happened. On June 11, 1971, the New York Daily Mirror announced the exclusive publication of Reminiscences of Observations by "His Imperial Highness Aleksei Nicholaevich Romanoff, Tsarevich and Grand Duke of Russia." The U.S. Government never officially recognized Goleniewski as a Romanoff, due to the fact that the Czar left millions in American and European banks, which today is worth billions. Goleniewski pledged, that as the Czar's heir, he would use the money to destroy Communism.

Nixon also angered the Illuminati because of his choice of Vice Presidents. After Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned because of income tax evasion charges, Establishment insiders had urged Nixon to appoint Nelson Rockefeller. However, Nixon instead, appointed Gerald Ford to be his Vice President (who, when he became President, did appoint Rockefeller to be his VP). If Rockefeller would have been appointed, he would have become President after Nixon was destroyed. So, Nixon ruined their plans, and may have known that, because after he resigned, he was having problem with a swollen leg, and said that if he would have gone to Bethesda Naval Hospital to get it taken care of, he would have "never come out alive."

Later, Lynette "Squeaky" Fromme would attempt to shoot Ford on September 5, 1975; and on September 22, 1975, Sara Jane Moore would also attempt to shoot Ford. Moore said she was trying to expose the nation's "phony system of government" by elevating "Nelson Rockefeller to the Presidency." In a June, 1976, Playboy interview, she said that there is a "part that I don't think I can talk about. I just haven't figured out a way to talk about it and protect everyone. I'm not saying that anyone helped me plan it. I'm not just saying that there are other things- which means there are other people, though not in terms of a conspiracy. There are areas I'm not willing to talk about for a lot of reasons." The article also said that U.S. District Judge Samuel Conti, "added to the air of mystery surrounding her case (and) sealed all the trial evidence." This certainly gives some serious overtones to the attempts on Ford's life, and if they were actually meant to elevate Rockefeller to the Presidency.

The bottom line seems to be, that Nixon got cocky. With the Illuminati hoping to have world control by 1976(it was "rescheduled" for the mid-eighties), Nixon was hoping to follow in the steps of Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt who were virtual dictators, and began acting on his own to bring about change, so he could head the world government. On May 21, 1971, James Reston (CFR) wrote in an article that appeared in the New York Times: "Mr. Nixon would obviously like to preside over the creation of a new world order, and believes he sees an opportunity to do so in the last twenty months of his first term." It is likely that the plan to get rid of Nixon was beginning to take shape at this time.

In the summer of 1973, Republicans partial to Nixon had announced to the Washington media that they wanted Nixon to be elected to a third term and had organized a group known as "The Committee to Repeal the Twenty-Second Amendment." The movement sort of died within a couple of weeks. Then in October, came the rumor that Nixon may be considering a military coup to stay in office. Gen. Alexander Haig told the Congress during his confirmation hearings for the position of Secretary of State on January 1981, that some people in Washington were "flirting with solutions which would have been extra-Constitutional." Watergate Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski warned the grand jury, that if they decided to indict Nixon, he may use force to remain in office. In June, 1982, Harold Evans, Watergate grand juror, appearing on a segment of the ABC-TV news show "20/20", said that Jaworski told them, that if they indicted Nixon, he might "surround the White House with armed forces."

On October 26, 1973, in a Washington Star article called "Has President Nixon Gone Crazy?", syndicated columnist Carl Rowan wrote, that "in the face of a vote to impeach he might try, as " commander-in-chief " , to use military forces to keep himself in power." In an article called "The Pardon", in the August, 1983 edition of the Atlantic Monthly, Seymour Hersh, one of Nixon's Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote that in a December 22, 1973 meeting: "He kept on referring to the fact that he may be the last hope, (that) the eastern elite was out to get him. He kept saying, 'This is our last and best hope. The last chance to resist the fascists' (of the left). His words brought me straight up out of my chair. I felt the President, without the words having been said, was trying to sound us out to see if we would support him in some extra-constitutional action." He continued: " (Secretary of Defense James) Schlesinger began to investigate what forces could be assembled at his order as a counterweight to the Marines, if Nixon- in a crisis-chose to subvert the Constitution, The notion that Nixon could at any time resort to extraordinary steps to preserve his presidency was far more widespread in the government than the public perceived..." He felt it would be led by General Robert Cushman, the Marine Representative on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who had been loyal to Nixon ever since he had been his military aide while he was the Vice President under Eisenhower. Schlesinger, in July, 1974, believing the Washington contingent of Marines to be the probable force used in a coup attempt, began developing a strategy to bring in the Army's 82nd Airborne Division from Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

 

On August 2, 1974, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger admitted that General Haig had informed him that Nixon was considering the idea of surrounding the White House with troops. In a August 27, 1974. article in the Washington Post, called "Military Coup Fears Denied": "Defense Secretary James Schlesinger requested a tight watch in the military chain of command to ensure that no extraordinary orders went out from the White House during the period of uncertainty (and) that no commanders of any forces should carry out orders which came from the White House, or elsewhere, outside the normal military channels."

 

The limited scope of any coup attempt would have prevented its success, and Pentagon officials knew that. Rather than a plot by the Illuminati to militarily take over the government, it seemed to be more of an attempt by Nixon to keep from getting pushed out of office by the powers that actually run this country. In the end, he knew what kind of power he was dealing with, and resigned his office on August 9th, rather than risk what remaining credibility he had, by trying to grab what he could not hold.

  CLICK  Startpage

 

 

THE CFR AND THEIR GOALS

 

The CFR's "1980's Project", evolved from a Council Study Group on International Order, which had met from 1971-73. They sought to duplicate the success they had achieved with the War & Peace Studies, and their concentration was to be on creating a new political and economic system that would have global emphasis. Miriam Camps, former Vice-Chairperson of the State Department's Policy Planning Council, recorded the group's discussion in a report called "The Management of Independence", which called for "the kind of international system which we should be seeking to nudge things."

 

In the fall of 1973, the 1980's Project was initiated, and to accommodate it, the CFR staff was expanded, and additional funds raised, including $1.3 million in grants from the Ford, Lilly, Mellon and Rockefeller Foundations. The Coordinating Committee had 14 men, with a full-time staff; plus 12 groups, each with 20 members; in addition to other experts and advisors who acted as consultants to the project. Some of the reports produced: "Reducing Global Inequities", "Sharing Global Resources", and "Enhancing Global Human Rights"

Stanley Hoffman, a chief participant of the Project, wrote a book in 1978, called Primacy or World Order, which he called an "illegitimate offspring" of the Project. Basically, it was a summary of the Project's work, and concluded that the best chance for foreign policy success, was to adopt a "world order policy."

  CLICK  Startpage

 

 

JIMMY CARTER

 

When Jimmy Carter was elected to the Presidency in 1976, some of the Project's strongest supporters, such as Cyrus Vance, Michael Blumenthal, Marshall Shulman, and Paul Warnke, went to the White House to serve in the new Administration.

 

In 1979, the Project was discontinued for being too unrealistic, which meant it was too soon for that kind of talk.

The CFR headquarters and library is located in the five-story Howard Pratt mansion(a gift from Pratt's widow, who was an heir to the Standard Oil fortune), 58 E. 68th Street, in New York City(on the corner of Park Ave. and 68th Street, 212-734-0400 & 212-861-1789 FX), on the opposite corner of the Soviet Embassy to the United Nations. They are a semi-secret organization whose 1966 Annual Report stated that members who do not adhere to its strict secrecy, can be dropped from their membership. On the national level, the Business Advisory Council and the Pilgrim Society are groups which form the inner circle of the CFR, while on the international level, it's the Bilderbergers.

James P. Warburg (banker, economist, a member of FDR's brain trust, and son of Paul M. Warburg) of the CFR, told a Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950:

"We shall have world government whether or not we like it. The only question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent."

The Chicago Tribune printed an editorial on December 9, 1950: "The members of the Council are persons of much more than average influence in the community. They have used the prestige that their wealth, their social position, and their education have given them to lead their country towards bankruptcy and military debacle. They should look at their hands. There is blood on them - the dried blood of the last war and the fresh blood of the present one."

They have only been investigated once, and that was in 1954, by the Special House Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations (the Reece Committee), who said that the CFR was "in essence an agency of the United States Government." The Committee discovered that their directives were aimed "overwhelmingly at promoting the globalistic concept."

  CLICK  Startpage

 

EDITH KERMIT ROOSEVELT

On December 23, 1961, columnist Edith Kermit Roosevelt (granddaughter of President Theodore Roosevelt) wrote in the Indianapolis News that CFR policies "favor...gradual surrender of United States sovereignty to the United Nations," Researcher Dan Smoot, a former FBI employee, said their goal was "to create a one- world socialist system and make the United States an official part of it."

Rep. John R. Rarick of Louisiana said: "The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education and mass communication-media , should be familiar to every American concerned with good government and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation's right-to-know machinery, the news media, usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities. The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship."

Phyllis Schlafly and Rear Admiral Chester Ward (former Judge Advocate General of the Navy from 1956-60), who was a member of the CFR for 16 years, wrote in their 1975 book Kissinger on the Couch that the CFR's "purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U. S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government is the only objective revealed to about 95 percent of 1,551 members(1975 figures). There are two other ulterior purposes that CFR influence is being used to promote; but it is improbable that they are known to more than 75 members, or that these purposes ever have even been identified in writing." The book went on to say that the "most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common - they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States." Ward's indictment of the group revealed their methods: "Once the ruling members of the CFR have decided that the U.S. Government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy, and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition."

The published accounts of CFR activities greatly understate their power and influence on national and foreign policy. They have been called the "invisible government" or a front for the intellectual leaders who hope to control the world through the Fabian technique of "gradualism". Besides their involvement in the government, they hold key positions in all branches of the media, including the control or ownership of major newspapers, magazines, publishing companies, television and radio stations.

 

The New York Times wrote: "The Council's membership includes some of the most influential men in government, business, education and the press (and) for nearly half a century has made substantial contributions to the basic concepts of American foreign policy." Newsweek called the Council's leadership the "foreign policy establishment of the U.S." Well-known political observer and writer Theodore White said: "The Council counts among its members probably more important names in American life than any other private group in the country." In 1971, J. Anthony Lukas wrote in the New York Times Magazine: "If you want to make foreign policy, there's no better fraternity to belong to than the Council."

 

From 1928-72, nine out of twelve Republican Presidential nominees were CFR members. From 1952-72, CFR members were elected four out of six times. During three separate campaigns, both the Republican and Democratic nominee was, or had been a member. Since World War II, practically every Presidential candidate, with the exception of Johnson, Goldwater, and Reagan, have been members.

The position of Supreme Allied Commander have usually been held by CFR members, like Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, Gen. Matthew B. Ridgeway, Gen. Alfred M. Groenther, Gen. Lauris Norstad, Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer, Gen. Andrew J. Goodpaster, and Alexander M. Haig, Jr. Most of the superintendents at the U. S. Military Academy at West Point have been members.

 

CFR members have held almost every key position, in every Administration, from Franklin D. Roosevelt to George Bush. During that 50 year period, every Secretary of State, with the exception of Cordell Hull, James F. Byrnes, and William Rogers, have been members. Every Secretary of Defense, from 1958, up to 1992, with the exception of Melvin Laird, have been members. Since 1920, 15 of 21 Treasury Secretaries have been members; and since the Eisenhower Administration, 10 out of 13 National Security Advisors have been members.

Curtis Dall wrote in his book, FDR: My Exploited Father-in-Law: "For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the USA. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political 'ammunition' as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the CFR-One World money group."

In President Harry Truman' s Administration, were CFR members : Dean Acheson (Secretary of State), Robert Lovett (Secretary of State, and later Secretary of Defense), W. Averill Harriman (Marshall Plan Administrator), John McCloy (High Commissioner to Germany) , George Kennan( State Department advisor) , Charles Bohlen(State Department advisor).

 

When CFR member Dwight Eisenhower became President, he appointed six CFR members to his Cabinet, and twelve to positions of 'Under Secretary': John Foster Dulles (Secretary of State, an in-law to the Rockefellers who was a founding member of the CFR, past Chairman of the Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace), Robert B. Anderson (Secretary of the Treasury), Lewis Straus (Secretary of Commerce), Allen Dulles (head of the 0SS operation in Switzerland during World War II who became Director of the CIA, and President of the CFR).

When CFR member John F. Kennedy took office, 63 of the 82 names on his list of prospective State Department officials, were CFR members. Among the more notable members in his Administration: Dean Rusk (Secretary of State), C. Douglas Dillon (Secretary of the Treasury), Adlai Stevenson (U. N. Ambassador), John McCone (CIA Director), W. Averell Harriman (Ambassador-at-large), John J. McCloy (Disarmament Administrator), Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff), John Kenneth Galbraith (Ambassador to India), Edward R. Murrow (head of the U. S. Information Agency), Arthur H. Dean (head of the U. S. Delegation to the Geneva Disarmament Conference), Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. (Special White House Assistant and noted historian), Thomas K. Finletter (Ambassador to NATO and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), George Ball (Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs) , McGeorge Bundy (Special Assistant for National Security, who went on to head the Ford Foundation), Robert McNamara (Secretary of Defense), Robert F. Kennedy (Attorney General), Paul H. Nitze (Assistant Secretary of Defense), Charles E. Bohlen (Assistant Secretary of State), Walt Restow (Deputy National Security Advisor), Roswell Gilpatrick (Deputy Secretary of Defense , Henry Fowler (Under Secretary of State), Jerome Wiesner (Special Assistant to the President), Angier Duke (Chief of Protocol. John Kenneth Galbraith said: "Those of us who had worked for the Kennedy election were tolerated in the government for that reason and had a say, but foreign policy was still with the Council on Foreign Relations people."

The CFR members in the Johnson Administration included: Roswell Gilpatrick (Deputy Secretary of Defense), Walt W. Rostow (Special Assistant to the President), Hubert H. Humphrey (Vice-President), Dean Rusk (Secretary of State), Henry Fowler (Secretary of the Treasury), George Bal l(Under Secretary of State), Robert McNamara (Secretary of Defense), Paul H. Nitze (Deputy Secretary of Defense), Alexander B. Trowbridge (Secretary of Commerce), William McChesney Martin (Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board), and Gen. Maxwell D. Taylor (Chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Board).

Nixon had resigned from the CFR in 1962, when it became an issue in the California gubernatorial primary campaign, but later rejoined. In his book, Six Crises, he wrote: "Admitting Red China to the United Nations would be a mockery of the provision of the Charter which limits its membership to 'peace-loving nations'..." Yet he wrote in the October, 1967 edition of Foreign Affairs how he would have a new policy towards Red China. Even after a July 15, 1971 statement on Radio Peking in China that called for the "people of the world, (to) unite and defeat the U.S. aggressors and all their running dogs," Nixon accepted an invitation by Premier Chou En Lai to go to China, where the groundwork for trade relations was established. He appointed over 100 CFR members to serve in his Administration: George Ball (Foreign Policy Consultant to the State Department), Dr. Harold Brown (General Advisory Committee of the U. S. Committee of the U. S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, and the senior member of the U. S. delegation for talks with Russia on SALT), Dr. Arthur Burns (Chairman of the Federal Reserve), C. Fred Bergsten (Operations Staff of the National Security Council), C. Douglas Dillon (General Advisory Committee of the U. S, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency), Richard N. Cooper (Operations Staff of the National Security Council), Gen. Andrew I. Goodpaster (Supreme Allied Commander in Europe), John W. Gardner (Board of Directors, National Center for Volunteer Action), Elliot L. Richardson (Under Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, Attorney General, and Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare), David Rockefeller (Task Force on International Development), Nelson A. Rockefeller (head of the Presidential Mission to Ascertain the Views of Leaders in the Latin America Countries), Rodman Rockefeller (Member, Advisory Council for Minority Enterprise), Dean Rusk (General Advisory Committee of the U. S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency), Gerald Smith (Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency), Cyrus Vance (General Advisory Committee of the U. S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency), Richard Gardner( member of the Commission on International Trade and Investment Policy), Sen. Jacob K. Javits (Representative to the 24th Session of the General Assembly of the UN), Henry A. Kissinger (Secretary of State, Harvard professor who was Rockefeller's personal advisor on foreign affairs, openly advocating a "New World Order"), Henry Cabot Lodge (Chief Negotiator of the Paris Peace Talks), Douglas MacArthur II (Ambassador to Iran), John J. McCloy (Chairman of the General Advisory Committee of the U. S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency), Paul H. Nitze (senior member of the U. S. delegation for the talks with Russia on SALT), John Hay Whitney (member of the Board of Directors for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting), George P. Shultz (Secretary of the Treasury), William Simon (Secretary of Treasury), Stanley R. Resor (Secretary of the Army), William E. Colby (Director of the CIA), Peter G. Peterson (Secretary of Commerce), James Lynn (Housing Secretary), Paul McCracken (chief economic aide), Charles Yost (UN Ambassador), Harlan Cleveland (NATO Ambassador), Jacob Beam (USSR Ambassador), David Kennedy (Secretary of Treasury).

Under CFR member President Ford, were other CFR members: William Simon (Secretary of Treasury), Nelson Rockefeller (Vice-President).

President Carter appointed over 60 CFR members to serve in his Administration: Walter Mondale (Vice-President), Zbigniew Brzeznski (National Security Advisor), Cyrus R. Vance (Secretary of State), W. Michael Blumenthal (Secretary of Treasury), Harold Brown (Secretary of Defense), Stansfield Turner (Director of the CIA), Gen. David Jones (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff). Jimmy Carter became a member in 1983.

There were 75 CFR and Trilateral Commission members in the Reagan Administration: Alexander Haig (Secretary of State), George Shultz (Secretary of State), Donald Regan (Secretary of Treasury), William Casey (CIA Director), Malcolm Baldridge (Secretary of Commerce), Jeane J. Kirkpatrick (UN Ambassador), Frank C. Carlucci (Deputy Secretary of Defense), William E. Brock (Special Trade Representative).

During his 1964 campaign for the U.S. Senate in Texas, George Bush said: "If Red China should be admitted to the UN, then the UN is hopeless and we should withdraw." In 1970, as Ambassador to the UN, he pushed for Red China to be seated in the General Assembly. Bush became the first President to publicly mention the "New World Order", and had in his Administration, nearly 350 CFR and Trilateral Commission members: Brent Scowcroft (National Security Advisor) , Richard B. Cheney (Secretary of Defense), Colin L. Powell (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff), William Webster (Director of the CIA), Richard Thornburgh (Attorney General), Nicholas F. Brady (Secretary of Treasury), Lawrence S. Eagleburger (Deputy Secretary of State), Horace G. Dawson, Jr. (U. S. Information Agency and Director of the Office of Equal Opportunity and Civil Rights), Alan Greenspan (Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board).

  CLICK  Startpage

 

 

Among the CFR members in the Administration of CFR member Bill Clinton (who Newsweek magazine referred to as the "New Age President"), are: Al Gore (Vice-President) , Donna E. Shalala (Secretary of Health and Human Services), Laura D. Tyson (Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors), Alice M. Rivlin (Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget), Madeleine K. Albright (US Ambassador to the United Nations), Warren Christopher (Secretary of State), Clifton R. Wharton, Jr. (Deputy Secretary of State and former Chairman of the Rockefeller Foundation), Les Aspin (Secretary of Defense), Colin Powell (Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff), W. Anthony Lake (National Security Advisor), George Stephanopoulos (Senior Advisor), Samuel R. Berger (Deputy National Security Advisor), R. James Woolsey (CIA Director) , William J. Crowe, Jr. (Chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board), Lloyd Bentsen (former member, Secretary of Treasury), Roger C. Altman (Deputy Secretary of Treasury), Henry G. Cisneros (Secretary of Housing and Urban Development) , Bruce Babbit (Secretary of the Interior), Peter Tarnoff (Undersecretary of State for International Security of Affairs), Winston Lord (Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs), Strobe Talbott (Aid Coordinator to the Commonwealth of Independent States), Alan Greenspan (Chairman of the Federal Reserve System), Walter Mondale (U.S. Ambassador to Japan), Ronald H. Brown (Secretary of Commerce), Franklin D. Raines (Economics and International Trade).

The Christian Science Monitor said that "almost half of the Council members have been invited to assume official government positions or to act as consultants at one time or another."

The Council accepts only American citizens, and has a membership of about 2,900, including influential bankers, corporate officers, and leading government officials who have been significantly affecting domestic and foreign policy for the past 30 years.

 Every member had been handpicked by David Rockefeller, who heads the inner circle of the CFR.

It is believed that the hierarchy of this inner circle includes descendants of the original Illuminati conspirators,

 who have Americanized their original family names in order to conceal that fact.

 

  CLICK  Startpage

 

Some of the CFR directors have been: Walter Lippman(1932-37), Adlai Stevenson (1958-62), Cyrus Vance(1968-76, 1981-87), Zbigniew Brzezinski(1972-77), Robert O. Anderson (1974-80 ) , Paul Volcker(1975-79), Theodore M. Hesburgh(1926-85), Lane Kirkland(1976-86), George H. W. Bush(1977-79), Henry Kissinger(1977-81), David Rockefeller(l949-85), George Shultz(1980-88), Alan Greenspan(1982-88), Brent Scowcroft(1983-89), Jeane J. Kirkpatrick(1985- ), Warren M. Christopher(1982-91 ) and Richard Cheney(1987-89),

Among the members of the media who have been in the CFR: William Paley (CBS), Dan Rather (CBS), Harry Reasoner (CBS), Bill Moyers (NBC), Tom Brokaw (NBC), John Chancellor (NBC), Marvin Kalb (CBS), Irving Levine, David Brinkley (ABC), John Scali, Barbara Walters (ABC), William Buckley (PBS), Daniel Schorr( CBS), Robert McNeil (PBS), Jim Lehrer (PBS), and Hodding Carter III.

Some of the College Presidents that have been CFR members: Michael I. Sovern (Columbia University) , Frank H. T. Rhodes (Cornell University), John Brademus (New York University), Alice S. Ilchman (Sarah Lawrence College), Theodore M. Hesburgh (Notre Dame University), Donald Kennedy (Stanford University), Benno J. Schmidt, Jr. (Yale University), Hanna Holborn Gray (University of Chicago), Stephen Muller (Johns Hopkins University), Howard R. Swearer (Brown University), Donna E. Shalala (University of Wisconsin), and John P. Wilson (Washington and Lee University).

Some of the major newspapers that have been controlled or influenced by the CFR: New York Times (Sulzbergers, James Reston, Max Frankel, Harrison Salisbury), Washington Post (Frederick S. Beebe, Katherine Graham, Osborne Elliott), Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe, Baltimore Sun, Chicago Sun-Times, L.A. Times Syndicate, Houston Post, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Arkansas Gazette, Des Moines Register & Tribune, Louisville Courier, Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters News Service, and Gannett Co. (publisher of USA Today, and 90 other daily papers, plus 40weeklies; and also owns 15 radio stations, 8 TV stations, and 40,000 billboards).

In 1896, Alfred Ochs bought the New York Times, with the financial backing of J. P. Morgan (CFR) , August Belmont (Rothschild agent), and Jacob Schiff(Kuhn, Loeb). It later passed to the control of Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, who was also a CFR member. Eugene Meyer, a CFR member, bought the Washington Post in 1933. Today it is run by his daughter, Katherine Graham, also a member of the CFR.

Some of the magazines that have been controlled or influenced by the CFR: Time (founded by CFR member Henry Luce, who also publish Fortune, Life, Money, People, Entertainment Weekly, and Sports Illustrated; and Hedley Donovan), Newsweek (owned by the Washington Post, W. Averell Harriman, Roland Harriman, and Lewis W. Douglas), Business Week, U.S. News & World Report, Saturday Review, National Review, Reader's Digest, Atlantic Monthly, McCall's, Forbes, Look, and Harper's Magazine.

Some of the publishers that have been controlled or influenced by the CFR: Macmillan, Random House, Simon & Schuster, McGraw-Hill, Harper Brothers, Harper & Row, Yale University Press, Little Brown & Co., Viking Press, and Cowles Publishing.

G. Gordon Liddy, former Nixon staffer, now talk show pundit, laughs off the idea of a New World Order, saying that there are so many different organizations working toward their own goals of a one-world government, that they cancel each other out. Not the case. You have seen that their tentacles are very far reaching as far as the government and the media. However, as I will outline below, you will see that the CFR has a heavy cross membership with many groups; as well as a cross membership among the directorship of many corporate boards, and this is a good indication that their efforts are concerted.

Some of the organizations and think-tanks that have been controlled or influenced by the CFR: Brookings Institute, RAND Corporation, American Assembly, Foreign Policy Association (a more open sister to the CFR, which CFR member Raymond Fosdick, Undersecretary of General to the League of Nations, helped create), World Affairs Council, Business Advisory Council, Committee for Economic Development, National Foreign Trade Council, National Bureau of Economic Research, National Association of Manufacturers, National Industrial Conference Board, Americans for Democratic Action, Hudson Institute, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Institute for Defense Analysis, World Peace Foundation, United Nations Association, National Planing Association, Center for Inter-American Relations, Free Europe Committee, Atlantic Council of the U.S. (founded in 1961 by CFR member Christian Herter), Council for Latin America, National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, African-American Institute, and the Middle East Institute.

Some of the many companies that have been controlled or influenced by the CFR: Morgan, Stanley; Kuhn, Loeb; Lehman Brothers; Chase Manhattan Bank; J. P. Morgan and Co.; First National City Bank; Brown Brothers, Harriman and Co.; Bank of New York; Citicorp; Chemical Bank; Bankers Trust of New York; Manufacturers Hanover; Morgan Guaranty; Equitable Life; New York Life; Metropolitan Life; Mutual of New York; Exxon; Mobil; Atlantic-Richfield (Arco); Texaco; IBM; AT & T; General Electric; ITT; DuPont; General Motors; Ford; Chrysler; R. H. Macy; Federated Department Stores; Gimbel Brothers; Sears, Roebuck & Co.; J. C. Penney Co.; May Department Stores; U.S. Steel; and Allied Stores.

In September, 1922, when the CFR began publishing its quarterly magazine, Foreign Affairs, the editorial stated that its purpose was "to guide American opinion." By 1924, it had "established itself as the most authoritative American review dealing with international relations." This highly influential magazine has been the leading publication of its kind, and has a circulation of over 75,000. Reading this publication can be highly informative as to the views of its members. For instance, the Spring, 1991 issue, called for a UN standing army, consisting of military personnel from all the member nations, directly under the control of the UN Security Council.

A major source of their funding (since 1953), stems from providing a " corporate service" to over 100 companies for a minimum fee of $1,000, that furnishes subscribers with inside information on what is going on politically and financially, both internationally and domestically; by providing free consultation, use of their extensive library, a subscription to Foreign Affairs, and by holding seminars on reports and research done for the Executive branch. They also publish books and pamphlets, and have regular dinner meetings to allow speakers and members to present positions, award study fellowships to scholars, promote regional meetings and stage round-table discussion meetings.

Being that the Council on Foreign Relations was able to infiltrate our government, it is no wonder that our country has been traveling the course that it has. The moral, educational and financial decline of this nation has been no accident. It has been due to a carefully contrived plot on the behalf of these conspirators who will be satisfied with nothing less than a one-world government. And believe me, it is coming to that. As each year goes by, the momentum is picking up, and it is becoming increasingly clear, what road our government is taking. The proponents of one-world government are becoming less secretive, as evidenced by George Bush's talk of a "New World Order". The reason for that, is that they feel it is too late for their plans to be stopped. They have become so entrenched in our government, our financial structure, and our commerce, that they probably do control this country, if not the world. In light of this, it is only a matter of time before their plans are fully implemented.

Table of Contents

[See: KGB-DESTABLISING CHART]

TOP OF PAGE

A STUDY IN

 RUSSIAN AND GERMAN STRATEGY

www.worldreports.org

 

[IN MEMORY OF A GREAT PATRIOT AND SEEKER AFTER TRUTH

 

CHRISTOPHER STORY

WHO IT IS BELIEVED WAS ASSASSINATED IN JULY-2010]

 

[IF YOU HAVE ANY DIFFICULTY IN GRASPING THE  INTENTION EXPLICIT IN THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS YOU ONLY NEED TO CONTACT THE ED AND DAVID MILIBAND BROTHERS WHO WILL WE ARE SURE EXPLAIN THE DETAIL TO YOU]

'Federation is a transitional form towards complete union...of all nations.'

These on the National and Colonial Questions adopted by the Second Comintern Congress.28th July 1920 [Protocal, ii, page 224

*

'The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into small states, and all national isolation, not only to bring nations closer together, but also to merge them... The merging of States is inevitable'

V.I.LENIN, 'Imperialism and Right to Self-determination' cited in a paper by the British Communist R PALME DUTT, published in 1949 by the International Publishers, New York

*

'The right of self-determination, the stage of possible separation or alternative federation is, Lenin insisted, only a prelude or transission to the ultimate aim of merging of nations.'

 

R PALME DUTT, in the paper mentioned above, published in 1949 by International Publishers ,New York.  In this statement, the author accurately anticipated, by a margin of 48 years, the precise twin threats Britain faces at the beginning of the 21st century, as a consequence of the blindness of its leaders and policymakers: separation, to be followed by federation. This is LENIN'S idea.

*

'An example... is what is happening in the Soviet Union. Separation must come before integration'

 The United Nations in the 1990's: 'A Second Chance?' Max JAKOBSON, Twentieth Century Fund [A united Nations FRONT GROUP. 1993, page 123.

*

 'The Soviet United States of Europe is the only correct slogan pointing the way out from European disunity which threatens not only Germany but the whole of Europe with complete structural and cultural decline'.

 

LEON TROTSKY, writing in his journal 'The Bullletin of the Opposition' . Number 17-18, November-December 1930,page 53

*

'The aim is to carry forward the ideas of the New World Order'

 

KARL MARX, cited in 'Karl Marx and the United States', JAMES E JACKSON,Interbnational Publishers, New York. July 1983

*

'The transition step to a the New World Social Order involves merging the newly captive nations into regional governments'

 

F PETRENKO and V. POPOV, 'Soviet Foreign Policy, Objectives and principlies', Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1985.

*

'The objective of Communist strategy is [to set up] the New World  Social Order'

WILLIAM Z FOSTER, the late leader of the Communist Party,USA, in 'Towards Soviet America', Elgin Publications, Balboa Island, California, 1961, originally published in 1932.

*

'If we...are by nature too primitive to rise above our aggressive instioncts and selfish greed must we not be forced by a supranational authority to submit to a New World Order that will ensure survival?  As been pointed out by one of its advocates, the German physcist, Karl Fredrich von Weizsacker, such a world order would have to be a harsh dictatorship'

'The United Nations in the 1990's: A Second Chance?, MAX JAKOBSON, Twentieth Century Fund, 1993.

*

'Today I have to speak about a New World, a world that is at a risky but promising stage in nits historic long march towards unity'

 

MICHEL CAMDESSUS, former Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, in a speech at the IMF/WORLD BANK Annual Meetings, 10th October 1995 [page 7 of tect and as delivered.]

*

'We are experiencing an increasing abandonment of sovereignty within the European Community in favour of this Community and, as I hope, also in favour of [a] European Parliament equipped with full rights'

HANS-DIETRICH GENSCHER, the German Foreign Minister and agent of influence (controlled by Aleksandr Bessmertnykh - the chief Soviet controller of agents of influence - under the code-name 'Tulpe', or Tulip'), 'Der Spiegel', September 25, 1989.

*

'We set ourselves the ultimate aim of destroying the state' VLADIMIR V LENIN.

'State and Revolution'  ,International Publishers, new York, 1961 Edition, page 68

*

'The 'nation state' in the style of the last century has ceased to exist as an impermable structure and to be quite plain, nor should it exist any longer'.

DR PROFESSOR ROMAN HERZOC, President of the German Federal Republic, 17th September, 1996.

*

'National Sovereignty is becoming irrelevant and meaningless for all that many still cling to it'

 

OTTO VON DER GABLENTZ, the German Ambassador to Russia, spouting Russian policy in the journal of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Internatuional Affairs, June, 1994

*

'All countries are basically social arrangements. No matter how permanent and even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary'

 

STROBE TALBOTT, who later became Deputy US Secretary of State, 1992.

*

'Our vision of the European space from the Atlantic to the Urals is not that  of a closed system. Since it includes the Soviet Union'

 

[sic, he said this in June 1992 six months after  the USSR had 'ceased to exist'] which reaches to the shores of the Pacific, it goes beyond nominal geographical boundaries' MIKAIL GORBACHEV, Nobel PEACE PRIZE LECTURE, OSLO, June 1992

*

'I look forward to the day when Russia is a fully-fledged member of the European Community'

JOHN MAJOR, the former British 'Conservative' Prime Minister , spouting Russian policy in his 1992 New Year's Day broardcast on BBC Radio 4. 

*

'Thou are Euro and on this Euro I will build Europe'

PEDRO SOLBES, Spanish Finance Minister of the day, MADRID, 15th December, 1995, cited in'The New York Times. 16th December, 1995.

This blasphemous statement is typical of the 'builders' of the European Union Collective and the New World Social Order, from which GOD is excluded.

See

+1

*

'The achievement of German unification, which we jointly welcome, gives a nrew dimension and a broader horizon to our cooperation, the aim of which has been from the very outset to advance together the cause of European unification in all spheres

 

Joint statement issued by CHANCELLOR HELMET KOHL and the late PRESIDENT FRANCOIS MITTERRAND at their meeting in MUNICH on 18th september 1990, cited by the controlled agent of influence Hans-Dietrich Genscher in a Policy Statement  on the Treaty on the Final Settlement with resopect to Germany, in the Bundestag on 20th September 1990. This statement referred obliquely to the requirement in the bilateral Franco-German treaty of the Elysee [22rd January 1963] for the two countries to 'reach...an analogous position' on all international, especially European issues.

 

[France is consulted by Germany on every issue before matters are dealt with elsewhere which places both as 'ONE' in all negotiations. And this is WHY the so-called UK has no real power at the HEART OF THE EU.]

That is why Germany and France are the co-drivers of the EXPRESS TRAIN of the EU.

*

'the EU must turn itself into a NEW SUPERPOWER [and should start work immediately on] a new political and institutional programme for a structure conmprising 24 or 30 countries'

 

JACQUES DELORS, former President of the European Commission, and also the most determined advocate of full-blooded socialism in France, citing Soviet strategy for the achievement of 'Europe from the

Atlantic to Vladivostok'-

which , thanks to the provisional , LENINIST'independence' of 'former' Soviet republics and the CONTROOLLED 'liberation' of Eastern Europe in the context of the inexplicable eastward expansion of the European Union (the 'replacement' collective), is well on the way towards realisation -in 'Der Spiegel',Germany, and also in 'Belvedere', Paris, october 1991.

*

'...Blake (SOVIET SPY)said that he believed'individual choice would eventually be mastered by a central Soviet control of though process'

GEORGE BLAKE, Soviet spy, explaining the Soviet conspiracy to achieve though-hegemony and agenda control (the common mind') as a key means of furthering LEINIST revolutionary objectives, to the late Kenneth de Courcy, cited by Chapman Pincher, in 'Traitors: The Labyrinths of Treason', Sidgewick & Jackson. Londobn, 1987, page 157''

*

'Citizens may not infringe upon the interests of the state, of society or of the collectibve'

 

Human Rights in China', Information Office of the State Council, November 1991, Beijing CHINA

*

'The right of self-determination, the stage of possible separation or alternative federation is, Lenin insisted, only a prelude or transission to the ultimate aim of merging of nations.'

 

R PALME DUTT, in the paper mentioned above, published in 1949 by International Publishers ,New York.  In this statement, the author accurately anticipated, by a margin of 48 years, the precise twin threats Britain faces at the beginning of the 21st century, as a consequence of the blindness of its leaders and policymakers: separation, to be followed by federation. This is LENIN'S idea.  

*

The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into small states, and all national isolation, not only to bring nations closer together, but also to merge them... The merging of States is inevitable'

 

V.I.LENIN, 'Imperialism and Right to Self-determination' cited in a paper by the British Communist R PALME DUTT, published in 1949 by the International Publishers, New York

*

'The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into small states, and all national isolation, not only to bring nations closer together, but also to merge them... The merging of States is inevitable'

V.I.LENIN, 'Imperialism and Right to Self-determination' cited in a paper by the British Communist R PALME DUTT, published in 1949 by the International Publishers, New York

*

TOP OF PAGE


'National Sovereignty is becoming irrelevant and meaningless for all that many still cling to it'

 

OTTO VON DER GABLENTZ, the German Ambassador to Russia, spouting Russian policy in the journal of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Internatuional Affairs, June, 1994

*

'All countries are basically social arrangements. No matter how permanent and even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary'

 

STROBE TALBOTT, who later became Deputy US Secretary of State, 1992.

*

'Our vision of the European space from the Atlantic to the Urals is not that  of a closed system. Since it includes the Soviet Union'

 

[sic, he said this in June 1992 six months after  the USSR had 'ceased to exist'] which reaches to the shores of the pacific, it goes beyond nominal geographical boundaries' MIKAIL GORBACHEV, Nobel PEACE PRIZE LECTURE, OSLO, June 1992

*

'I look forward to the day when Russia is a fully-fledged member of the European Community'

JOHN MAJOR, the former British 'Conservative' Prime Minister , spouting Russian policy in his 1992 New Year's Day broardcast on BBC Radio 4. 

*

'Thou are Euro and on this Euro I will build Europe'

PEDRO SOLBES, Spanish Finance Minister of the day, MADRID, 15th December, 1995, cited in'The New York Times. 16th December, 1995.

This blasphemous statement is typical of the 'builders' of the European Union Collective and the New World Social Order, from which GOD is excluded.

See

+1

*

'The achievement of German unification, which we jointly welcome, gives a nrew dimension and a broader horizon to our cooperation, the aim of which has been from the very outset to advance together the cause of European unification in all spheres

 

Joint statement issued by CHANCELLOR HELMET KOHL and the late PRESIDENT FRANCOIS MITTERRAND at their meeting in MUNICH on 18th september 1990, cited by the controlled agent of influence Hans-Dietrich Genscher in a Policy Statement  on the Treaty on the Final Settlement with resopect to Germany, in the Bundestag on 20th September 1990. This statement referred obliquely to the requirement in the bilateral Franco-German treaty of the Elysee [22rd January 1963] for the two countries to 'reach...an analogous position' on all international, especially European issues.

 

[France is consulted by Germany on every issue before matters are dealt with elsewhere which places both as 'ONE' in all negotiations. And this is WHY the so-called UK has no real power at the HEART OF THE EU.]

That is why Germany and France are the co-drivers of the EXPRESS TRAIN of the EU.

 

  CLICK  Startpage

 

*

'the EU must turn itself into a NEW SUPERPOWER [and should start work immediately on] a new political and institutional programme for a structure comprising 24 or 30 countries'

 

JACQUES DELORS, former President of the European Commission, and also the most determined advocate of full-blooded socialism in France, citing Soviet strategy for the achievement of 'Europe from the

Atlantic to Vladivostok'-

which , thanks to the provisional , LENINIST'independence' of 'former' Soviet republics and the CONTROLLED 'liberation' of Eastern Europe in the context of the inexplicable eastward expansion of the European Union (the 'replacement' collective), is well on the way towards realisation -in 'Der Spiegel',Germany, and also in 'Belvedere', Paris, October 1991.

*

'...Blake (SOVIET SPY)said that he believed 'individual choice would eventually be mastered by a central Soviet control of though process'

GEORGE BLAKE, Soviet spy, explaining the Soviet conspiracy to achieve though-hegemony and agenda control (the common mind') as a key means of furthering LEINIST revolutionary objectives, to the late Kenneth de Courcy, cited by Chapman Pincher, in 'Traitors: The Labyrinths of Treason', Sidgewick & Jackson. London, 1987, page 157''

*

'Citizens may not infringe upon the interests of the state, of society or of the collective'

 

Human Rights in China', Information Office of the State Council, November 1991, Beijing CHINA

*

'The right of self-determination, the stage of possible separation or alternative federation is, Lenin insisted, only a prelude or transision to the ultimate aim of merging of nations.'

 

R PALME DUTT, in the paper mentioned above, published in 1949 by International Publishers ,New York.  In this statement, the author accurately anticipated, by a margin of 48 years, the precise twin threats Britain faces at the beginning of the 21st century, as a consequence of the blindness of its leaders and policymakers: separation, to be followed by federation. This is LENIN'S idea.  

*

The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into small states, and all national isolation, not only to bring nations closer together, but also to merge them... The merging of States is inevitable'

 

V.I.LENIN, 'Imperialism and Right to Self-determination' cited in a paper by the British Communist R PALME DUTT, published in 1949 by the International Publishers, New York

*

'The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into small states, and all national isolation, not only to bring nations closer together, but also to merge them... The merging of States is inevitable'

V.I.LENIN, 'Imperialism and Right to Self-determination' cited in a paper by the British Communist R PALME DUTT, published in 1949 by the International Publishers, New York

 

*

 

 CLICK BELOW FOR A SELECTION OF PAST MONTHLY INDEX FILES
JUNE-2011

MAY-2011-

&

MAY 2011-MAIN FILE

 

APRIL-

MARCH-

FEB

JAN 2011

DEC-2010

NOV- OCT-
SEPT AUG- JULY- JULY- JUNE- MAY- MAY

ELECTION

 

 

MAY

 

APRIL
CLICK FOR OLD

 PRE-JUNE 27-2007 -

CLICK FOR OLD FORMAT FILE-FEB

2007

APRIL

 

 

MAR

 

 

 

FEB

 

 

 

JAN-2010 

 

DEC-2009

 

  JAN-09

to MAY-09

bulletins

 

 

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

British Cabinet Office Collaborates With French Brainwashing Guru To Change The Way We Think

 

 

[MIND CONTROL]

LATEST!

Big Society tsar resigns because the job is unpaid and finds a job with a charity-

Daily Mail-May 25-2011

See more on:

Brian Gerrish
UK Column

Feb 16, 2011

On 3 January 2011, following the UK Column’s lead article exposing insider dealing between the Cabinet office and political behavioural training charity[?]

 

COMMON PURPOSE

 

 

THE

INDEPENDENT

NEWSPAPER

 

revealed that David Cameron had also set up a Cabinet Office Behavioural Insight Team. Formed in July last year, the secretive cell is tasked to “dream up psychological tricks to alter our behaviour” – and on a massive scale.

 

The Independent article warned how the public is to be reframed or “nudged” into politically acceptable “Social Norms”; starting with healthy eating, voluntary work and tax gathering. While this may seem innocent to some people, these early ‘soft’ targets are already being greatly expanded to include wider central government ideological and political agendas, including Cameron’s socialist straitjacket of the Big Society. Elite multi-millionaire Socialist and Tory Chancellor George Osborne has already signed up to Behavioural Economics – another form of mental reframing of individuals and groups, specifically to achieve political economic objectives. Their theory and intent is, that once mentally retrained, we “willingly rush to pay excessive taxes”.

The danger is that we are to be trained to believe what our politicians and public sector – The State – says is right. And we will not even be aware that we have been ‘reframed’ to think so. Never mind the basics – politicians have been proved corrupt, deviant, liars  – the Soviet Union would have paid in blood and gold for Cameron’s political mind-control initiative to lock people in a hive mind.
Research by the UK Column now exposes that Cameron’s Lib Con government is collaborating behind closed doors with similar sinister units in the French Government, to develop further plans and techniques to change our natural behaviour.

Our investigation of little known Rosie Donachie, who is part of the Behavioural Insight Team under Maude, Gus O’Donnell and David Halpern, reveals that Donachie is a key player and go-between in the mental attack on the British public.

Aside from her position as Senior Advisor with the Cabinet Office Behavoural Insights Team, she is also a Trustee of the Franco-British Council, and is involved with the Party of European Socialists based in Brussels. Not surprisingly for her murky role, she even has two names, being referred to as Rosalin in her Franco-British guise.

 

Tracking Mrs Donachie’s path led UK Column investigative reporters to discover that on 17 November 2010, the Franco British Council had hosted a meeting inside 10 Downing Street attended by a mix of the Cabinet Behavioural Team and their French counterparts.

 

 Find out more about this evil CONSPIRACY - COMMON PURPOSE which has for some time had its HOME within the office of the DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER

 

 

http://www.ukcolumn.org/articles/quisling-plan-change

http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/bilderberg-2015-dates-confirmed

 

A MATTER OF FAITH! AND FREEDOM! 

*

' The less government we have the better-the fewer laws and the less confided power.  The antidote to this abuse of formal government is the influence of private character, the growth of the individual.'

Emerson.

 

 

[Tyrannical governments hate the INDIVIDUAL and those who have FAITH in THEIR GOD and it is most important that when the MYTH of RELIGION is exploded by the NWO that the PEOPLE remain TRUE to THEIR FAITH of GOODNESS because it is that very INDIVIDUALITY and FAITH and GOODNESS that the EVIL BILDERBERGERS/ ILLUMINATI - advocates of WORLD GOVERNMENT must DESTROY in order to bring the SHEEPLE! under their NEW AGE ATHEISTIC pattern coupling with EVIL in order to complete  the

SLAVERY and CONTROL of MANKIND.

 

The ONLY nation in the world with a written charter of FREEDOM  is the USA and the GOVERNMENT and TRAITORS of that CHARTER are doing everything they can to DESTROY IT! because that is ALL! that stands in the way of the DESTRUCTION of the once FREE PEOPLE of those UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

 

As their President Abraham Lincoln stated:

 

'This nation, under GOD [not LUCIFER], shall have a new birth of freedom, that government of the people, by the people, shall not perish from the earth'

 

[THE POWERS OF EVIL MUST DESTROY ALL GOD- FARING PEOPLE'S OR THEIR EVIL PLOT WILL FAIL.  IT IS THEREFORE IN THEIR INTEREST THAT COUNTRIES WITH FAITH IN THEIR GOD OF GOODNESS MUST BE DESTROYED.   STRONG RELIGIOUS FAITH IN A GOOD GOD IS WHAT THEY FEAR THAT IS WHY THEY PROMOTE AS MUCH EVIL AS THEY CAN SO THAT THEY HOPE IN TIME THE PEOPLE WILL WORSHIP THE RELIGION OF  EVIL AND LUCIFER  AND NOT  A GOD OF GOODNESS.

 

Finally, a great defender of American LIBERTY stated:

 

'Nothing will ruin a country if the people themselves will undertake its safety; and nothing can save it if they leave that safety in any hands but its own.']

 

IT'S YOUR FREEDOM - YOU MUST FIGHT FOR IT!

 

 

FEBRUARY-2011

 
     
    IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!  -LATEST! - WHAT IS A EUROSCEPTIC? DAVID CAMERON AS A BILDERBERGER-YOU KNOW THIOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE SERVANTS OF THE WORLD GOVERNMENT CROWD WHO ARE DESTROYING NATION STATES AND HAVE AN AGENDA TO REDUCE THE WORLD POPULATION DOWN TO 500,000,000 -SO ANYTHING THAT DAVID CAMERON SAYS REGARDING EUROSCEPTICISM NEEDS TO BE TAKEN WITH A PINCH OF SALT OR PEPPER IF YOU WISH TO CLEAR YOUR TEARS AWAY.   IT IS A SUNNY SATURDAY MORNING AND HAVE OPENED THE DAILY MAIL TO SEE STEPHEN GLOVER'S ARTICLE 'Has Cameron now broken a second pledge on Europe' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1325008/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Has-David-Cameron-broken-SECOND-pledge-Europe.html

+ WE NOW HEAR ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 11,2010 IN CHRISTOPHER BOOKER'S ARTICLE IN THE DAILY MAIL SHOWN BELOW 'The ultimate surrender of Britain's sovereignty' - THE PROBLEM AS WE SEE IT IS THAT THOSE WHO HAVE FOR YEARS FOUGHT THE EUROSCEPTIC CAUSE REFUSE TO GET TO THE BASICS REGARDING THE TRUE STATE OF GOVERNANCE IN ENGLAND - WE LET THOSE FROM OUR SISTER NATIONS TO FIGHT THEIR OWN CAUSE. - THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS WELL KNOWN SUCH AS WHO REALLY RUNS OUR COUNTRY AND FOR THAT MATTER THE OLD COMMONWEALTH NATIONS - IT IS THE CITY OF LONDON HEADED BY OUR ONCE TRUE SOVEREIGN LORD -QUEEN ELIZABETH II - ASSISTED BY GEORGE OSBORNE-CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER -A BILDERBERGER A SERVANT OF THE ILLUMINATI - ROTHCHILD'S BANK OF ENGLAND.- WHY? OH! WHY -WON'T THOSE MANY DEFENDER'S OF ENGLISH FREEDOM STATE OUTRIGHT THAT THE BILDERBERGERS ARE TRAITORS AND SHOULD STAND TRIAL FOR TREASON?- YES! -YES! - WE KNOW THAT IN 1998 TONY BLAIR SECRETLY INSERTED A CLAUSE IN A BILL TO PROTECT HIMSELF AND EVERYONE ELSE INCLUDING THE ONCE QUEEN OF ENGLAND FROM A TREASON TRIAL. - WHAT WE ARE OBSERVING IS A LOT OF HOT AIR - A FIRM RESOLUTE DETERMINATION TO DO ANYTHING BUT STATE THE REAL OBVIOUS SITUATION WHICH FACES US - THE BILDERBERGERS ARE IN ALL THE POLITICAL PARTIES AT WESTMINSTER - THEY ARE SERVANTS OF ROTHCHILD'S BANK OF ENGLAND AND THE CITY OF LONDON - IT HAS BEEN THE SAME SINCE THE BANK WAS PRIVATISED AT THE END OF THE 17TH CENTURY - SEE 'CENTRAL BANKS!' - INTERNATIONAL BANKERS! IN OUR MULTI VIEW INDEX FILE BELOW. - STRONG TALK AND GRIPPING NEWS STORIES ARE USEFUL - BUT! IT WILL NOT REPLACE REALITY - TO FACE THE TRUE FACTS WHICH FACE EVERY FREEDOM LOVING PERSON IN ENGLAND AND IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. - NOTHING WILL CHANGE UNTIL WE ALL SING FROM THE SAME HYMN-SHEET. ACKNOWLEDGE THE REAL ENEMY WITHIN AND AT LEAST YOU WILL HAVE THE SATISFACTION OF KNOWING THE TRUE FACTS EVEN IF THEY SHOW A FORMIDABLE FOE - IF THERE WAS MORE OPEN DISCUSSION IT IS POSSIBLE THAT NOT ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI AGREE WITH THE EVIL AGENDA AND MIGHT IF THE PEOPLE SHOWED MORE OF THEIR ACCUSTOMED FIERY NATURE -AND FIGHT!!! - A CHANCE TO BRING GOOD OUT OF EVIL FOR THE BETTERMENT OF ALL MANKIND!- BUT IT IS UP TO EACH OF YOU TO BRAVELY MAKE A PLEDGE AND JOIN THE FIGHT! - NOTHING ELSE WILL SAVE YOUR FREEDOM - YOUR IDENTITY - YOUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE. -AND INDEED EVEN YOUR OWN LIFE!- AS UNLESS YOU ARE PART OF THE ELITE OR SMALL NUMBER OF SLAVES PERMITTED TO SERVE THE ILLUMINATI - YOUR CHANCES OF LIFE ARE NIL. - THIS IS AN OPEN SECRET BUT AS THE EFFECTS OF A BIG LIE - A BIG TRUTH IS ALSO HARD TO CONTEMPLATE - THE CHOICE IS YOURS!- MAKE IT SOON OR IT WILL BE AS OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL STATED TO A PACKED AND HUSHED HOUSE OF COMMONS SHORTLY BEFORE THE SECOND WORLD WAR WHEN FACTS WERE DESPERATELY NEEDED OF GERMANY'S GROWING STRENGTH FOR WAR AND THE NEED TO REARM BEFORE IT WAS - TOO!!! LATE!!! - THE SAME SITUATION APPLIES TODAY IN AUGUST, 2010 - WE ARE AT WAR! AGAINST A FORMIDABLE ENEMY - [THE BILDERBERGERS-ILLUMINATI] - THEIR INTEBNTIONS HIDDEN FROM SIGHT BUT ,NEVERTHELESS , IS A GREATER THREAT THAN THAT WHICH FACED THE COUNTRY THEN - BECAUSE THIS ENEMY HAS PLANS TO DESTROY THE GREATER PART OF THE POPULATION OF OUR PLANET EARTH - WE ASK WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? - + WE HAVE REMINDED YOU ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS OF THE BILDERBERGER/ILLUMINATI TACTIC OF THE BAD-GUY AND GOOD-GUY SCENARIO WHICH IS TO UNDERMINE SOCIETY AND THE MEANS TO JUSTIFY THEIR TOTALITARIAN MEASURES - WE KNOW HOW SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR DID SUCH A WONDERFUL JOB IN THIS DIRECTION AND WE NOW HERE THAT THE SO-CALLED GOOD GUY DAVID CAMERON IS DOING HIS BEST TO FOLLOW THEIR EXAMPLE! - + A TRULY NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF DISSINTERESTED PATRIOTS - NOT BILDERBERGERS WHO OWE ALLEGIANCE TO A FOREIGN MASONIC BODY - WOULD HAVE MORE SUPPORT FROM THE POPULACE - A ONE - TERM SERVICE IN PARLIAMENT TO AVOID PRESSURE ON AN MP TO GO AGAINST HIS CONSCIENCE. - POSSIBLY A RETURN MIGHT BE PERMITTED AFTER EACH TERM OF ABSENCE BUT THE IMPORTANTANCE OF THE MEASURE IS TO PERMIT MORE CITIZENS FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE WHO WISH TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY - IT SHOULD NOT BE A JOB FOR LIFE - THE EARLY GREEKS HAVE MANY LESSONS WHICH WE COULD UTILISE FOR BETTER GOVERNANCE! - BUT THE BILDERBERGERS ARE ENJOYING THEIR SPOILS WHETHER IN GOVERNMENT OR SO-CALLED OPPOSITION. - THEY HAVE MADE FOOLS OF US FOR TOO! LONG! -AS WE STATED BEFORE THE MAY6 GENERAL ELECTION THEY SHOULD BE OUTLAWED FROM SERVICE IN OUR ONCE SACRED AND HALLOWED CHAMBER OF WESTMINSTER WHICH THROUGHOUT ITS LONG DISTINGUISHED HISTORY HAS HAD MANY HONORABLE MEMBERS -WE URGENTLY NEED OTHERS OF A TRULY DISINTERESTED NATURE OF WHICH THE HOUSE HAS FEW AND REPLACE THE GREATER MAJORITY WITHOUT DELAY.- IT IS IN YOUR HANDS -WILL YOU DO IT? + - ON THE EU CON! - DO YOU REMEMBER!! - WE TOLD YOU SO BEFORE THE GENERAL ELECTION ON MAY 6-2010 THAT DAVID CAMERON'S PROMISES ARE WORTHLESS!!!-THIS IS NOW CONFIRMED IN THE EXCELLENT ARTICLE IN THE DAILY MAIL IN THE MELONIE PHILLIPS COLUMN ON AUGUST 2010  -  " EURO POLICE KNOCKING ON YOUR DOOR. - SURGERY HALTED BY 48 HOUR WEEK - SO MUCH FOR TORY PROMISES ON THE EU. - AN EXTRACT OF THE ARTICLE FOLLOWS: " When the Tories fought the [MAY 6-2010] general election they promised they would yield NO MORE POWER to the EUROPEAN UNION, and that they will seek to regain from the EU some of the powers that Britain has already lost.  -These pledges were designed to take the sting out of the fact that they were not, after all, going to offer A REFERENDUM on the EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION. - Three month's on , it looks increasingly as if NONE of THEIR PROMISES to SAFEGUARD BRITISH POWER is going to BE KEPT.   Indeed the COALITION GOVERNMENT seems to be going in precisely THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.- Last week, Home Secretary Theresa May told the COMMONS that BRITAIN had decided to OPT INTO the controversal EUROPEAN INVESTIGATIVE ORDER [ IT SOUNDS EXACTLY WHAT IT MEANS -A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE UNDER THE NEW WORLD ORDER-DONT YOU THINK?] - According to critics, this will mean that PROSECUTORS from ANY EU COUNTRY will be granted unprecedented and intrusive powers over the people of Britain. - They would be able to BUG the PHONE CALLS of BRITISH CITIZENS, monitor THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS and gain access to THEIR DNA if they suspected them of committing a CRIME in THOSE COUNTRIES - however trivial the offence, and EVEN IF IT WERE NOT A CRIME IN THE UK. + [Caps and Comments in square brackets are OURS!-For our BULLETIN FILE click under previous work for complete article from the Daily Mail click the following:   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1299512/Euro-police-knocking-door-Surgery-halted-48-hour-week-So-Tory-promises-EU.html - + WE NOW HEAR ON WEDNESDAY THE 4TH AUGUST THAT THE IRISH GOVERNMENT HAS AGREED WITH BRUSSELS TO ALLOW HER TROOPS TO SERVE IN OTHER COUTRIES IN THE EU AS A POLICE FORCE AND ALLOW FOREIGN TROOPS TO BE ON THEIR STREETS TO KEEP ORDER -+ WHEN YOU TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE LONG FIGHT OF THE IRISH PEOPLE FOR THEIR RIGHT TO GOVERN THEMSELVES WITH MUCH BLOODSHED GOING BACK HUNDREDS OF YEARS IT MAKES ONE WONDER WHY THEY BOTHERED AT ALL TO DO SO WHEN THEY HAVE MADE THEMSELVES SLAVES TO EVERY COUNTRY IN THE EU? - WE OURSELVES HAVE CONSTANTLY WARNED AGAINST THIS VERY MEASURE BUT IT SEEMS IN THE CASE OF IRELAND WHERE WE EXPECTED MORE OPPOSITION WE HAVE HAD A MOUSE-LIKE SURRENDER!!!! -AS INSTEAD OF AN EXPECTED STOICAL FIGHT FOR THEIR LIBERTY THEY HAD TAKEN THE BAIT AND THE TRAP HAD BEEN SPRUNG.- AS WE HAVE ALSO STATED FOR SOME TIME THE ONCE ALLIES OF IRISH INDEPENDENCE AMERICA HAS 350,000 FOREIGN TROOPS AND A LARGE NUMBER OF FORIEGN POLICE ON ITS SACRED SOIL TO BE USED BY AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT WHEN A FALSE FLAG ATTACK ENABLES MARTIAL LAW TO BE IMPLEMENTED AND THEN THE LARGE NUMBER OF CONCENTRATION CAMPS BUILT BECAUSE THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE AND EVIDENCE OF MEANS OF EXTERMINATION HAVE BEEN REVEALED - THEY HAVE MILLIONS OF PLASTIC COFFINS READY TO BE FILLED - AND IT ALL COMES UNDER FEMA - THESE CONCENTRATION CAMPS UNDER FEMA -WHICH CAME INTO BEING AFTER THE FALSE FLAG ATTACK ON 9/11 - WILL BE FILLED BY MILLIONS OF PATRIOTIC AMERICAN CITIZENS WHO CAN SEE THAT THEIR GOVERNMENT IS A SATANIC ENTITY RUN BY THE BANKSTERS AND TRAITORS AT THE HEAD OF THE MEXICAN - USA - CANADIAN GOVERNMENTS WHO ARE DESPERATE TO CONCLUDE THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION TO MATCH THE EUROPEAN UNION WHICH CHANNEL 4 IN IT'S DOCUMENTARY FAILED TO BRING MORE FACTS TO LIGHT? - FROM WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OF DAVID CAMERON'S PROMISE OF NO MORE POWERS TO THE EU HE WILL NO DOUBT FOLLOW THE TRAITOROUS LEAD OF THE IRISH GOVERNMENT. - AS WE HAVE SAID IF THERE WAS ONE COUNTRY IN THE EU THAT WE BELIEVED WOULD PROTECT ITS COUNTRY IT WOULD BE IRELAND.
 
     
 

 

The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies

By Theodore J. O'Keefe



Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at the close of World War II.

At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention camps, horrified US infantrymen encountered heaps of dead and dying inmates, emaciated and diseased. Survivors told them hair-raising stories of torture and slaughter, and backed up their claims by showing the GIs crematory ovens, alleged execution gas chambers, supposed implements of torture, and even shrunken heads and lampshades, gloves, and handbags purportedly made from skin flayed from dead inmates.

US government authorities, mindful that many Americans who remembered the atrocity stories fed them during World War I still doubted the Allied propaganda directed against the Hitler regime, resolved to "document" what the GIs had found in the camps. Prominent newsmen and politicians were flown in to see the harrowing evidence, while the US Army Signal Corps filmed and photographed the scenes for posterity. Famous journalist Edward R. Murrow reported, in tones of horror, but no longer of disbelief, what he had been told and shown, and Dachau and Buchenwald were branded on the hearts and minds of the American populace as names of infamy unmatched in the sad and bloody history of this planet.

For Americans, what was "discovered" at the camps -- the dead and the diseased, the terrible stories of the inmates, all the props of torture and terror -- became the basis not simply of a transitory propaganda campaign but of the conviction that, yes, it was true: the Germans did exterminate six million Jews, most of them in lethal gas chambers.

What the GIs found was used, by way of films that were mandatory viewing for the vanquished populace of Germany, to "re-educate" the German people by destroying their national pride and their will to a united, independent national state, imposing in their place overwhelming feelings of collective guilt and political impotence. And when the testimony, and the verdict, of the Nuremberg Tribunal incorporated most, if not all, of the horror stories Americans were told about Dachau, Buchenwald, and other places captured by the US Army, the Holocaust could pass for one of the most documented, one of the most authenticated, one of the most proven historical episodes in the human record.

A Different Reality

But it is known today that, very soon after the liberation of the camps, American authorities were aware that the real story of the camps was quite different from the one in which they were coaching military public information officers, government spokesmen, politicians, journalists, and other mouthpieces.

When American and British forces overran western and central Germany in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.

Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America's leading forensic pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army's Judge Advocate General's Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team, Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim work at Dachau, he was questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors. [1]

Dr. Larson's findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: "What we've heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that is a hoax." [2] And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his biographer that to his knowledge he "was the only forensic pathologist on duty in the entire European Theater" of Allied military operations, [3] confirmed that "never was a case of poison gas uncovered." [4]

Typhus, Not Poison Gas

If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate victims at Dachau, Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they tortured to death or deliberately starved? The answers to these questions are known as well.

As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men discovered, the chief cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other camps was disease, above all typhus, an old and terrible scourge of mankind that until recently flourished in places where populations were crowded together in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in Germany at war's end, where, despite such measures as systematic delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the dead, the virtual collapse of Germany's food, transport, and public health systems led to catastrophe.

Perhaps the most authoritative statement of the facts as to typhus and mortality in the camps has been made by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D., Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that "The outbreaks in concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus infection encountered in Germany." Dr. Gordon summarized the causes for the outbreaks as follows: [5]

Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an astounding sight, a mixture of humanity travelling this way and that, homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them ...

Germany was in chaos. The destruction of whole cities and the path left by advancing armies produced a disruption of living conditions contributing to the spread of the disease. Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were seriously disrupted, food supply and food distribution was poor, housing was inadequate and order and discipline were everywhere lacking. Still more important, a shifting of populations was occurring such as few countries and few times have experienced.

Dr. Gordon's findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that "Thousands of prisoners who died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II weren't deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of diseases." [6]

Dr. Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed each day.

Despite noisily publicized claims and widespread popular notions to the contrary, no researcher has been able to document a German policy of extermination through starvation in the German camps.

No 'Human Skin' Lampshades

What of the ghoulish stories of concentration camp inmates skinned for their tattoos, flayed to make lampshades and handbags, or other artifacts? What of the innumerable "torture racks," "meathooks," whipping posts, gallows, and other tools of torment and death that are reported to have abounded at every German camp? These allegations, and even more grotesque ones proffered by Soviet prosecutors, found their way into the record at Nuremberg.

The lampshade and tattooed-skin charges were made against Ilse Koch, dubbed by journalists the "Bitch of Buchenwald," who was reported to have furnished her house with objects manufactured from the tanned hides of luckless inmates.

But General Lucius Clay, military governor of the US zone of occupied Germany, who reviewed her case in 1948, told his superiors in Washington: "There is no convincing evidence that she [Ilse Koch] selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins or that she possessed any articles made of human skin." [7] In an interview General Clay gave years later, he stated about the material for the infamous lampshades: "Well, it turned out actually that it was goat flesh. But at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for her to have gotten a fair trial." [8] Ilse Koch hanged herself in a German jail in 1967.

It would be tedious to itemize and refute the thousands of bizarre claims as to Nazi atrocities. That there were instances of German cruelty, however, is clear from the testimony of Dr. Konrad Morgen, a legal investigator attached to the Reich Criminal Police, whose statements on the witness stand at Nuremberg have never been challenged by proponents of the Jewish Holocaust story. Dr. Morgen informed the court that he had been given full authority by Heinrich Himmler, commander of Hitler's SS and the dread Gestapo, to enter any German concentration camp and investigate instances of cruelty and corruption on the part of camp personnel.

As he explained in sworn testimony at Nuremberg, Dr. Morgen investigated 800 such cases, resulting in more than 200 convictions. [9] Punishments included the death penalty for the worst offenders, including Hermann Florstedt, commandant of Lublin (Majdanek), and Karl Koch (Ilse's husband), commandant of Buchenwald.

While German camp commandants in certain cases did inflict physical punishment, such acts had to be approved by authorities in Berlin, and it was required that a camp physician first certify the good health of the prisoner to be disciplined, and then be on hand at the actual beating. [10] After all, throughout most of the war the camps were important centers of industrial activity. The good health and morale of the prisoners was critical to the German war effort, as is evidenced in a January 1943 order issued by SS General Richard Glücks, chief of the office that supervised the concentration camps. It held the camp commanders "personally responsible for exhausting every possibility to preserve the physical strength of the detainees." [11]

Camp Survivors: Merely Victims?

US Army investigators, working at Buchenwald and other camps, quickly ascertained what was common knowledge among veteran inmates: that the worst offenders, the cruelest denizens of the camps, were not the guards but the prisoners themselves. Common criminals of the same stripe as those who populate US prisons today committed many villainies, particularly when they held positions of authority, and fanatical Communists, highly organized to combat their many political enemies among the inmates, eliminated their foes with Stalinist ruthlessness.

Two US Army investigators at Buchenwald, Egon W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, carefully investigated circumstances in the camp before its liberation. In a detailed report submitted to their superiors, they revealed, in the words of Alfred Toombs, their commander, who wrote a preface to the report, "how the prisoners themselves organized a deadly terror within the Nazi terror." [12]

Fleck and Tenenbaum described the power exercised by criminals and Communists as follows:

The trusties, who in time became almost exclusively Communist Germans, had the power of life and death over all other inmates. They could sentence a man or a group to almost certain death ... The Communist trusties were directly responsible for a large part of the brutalities at Buchenwald.

Colonel Donald B. Robinson, chief historian of the American military government in Germany, summarized the Fleck-Tenenbaum report in an article published in an American magazine shortly after the war. Colonel Robinson wrote succinctly of the American investigators' findings: "It appeared that the prisoners who agreed with the Communists ate; those who didn't starved to death." [13]

Additional corroboration of inmate brutality has been provided by Ellis E. Spackman, who, as Chief of Counter-Intelligence Arrests and Detentions for the US Seventh Army, was involved in the liberation of Dachau. Spackman, later a professor of history at San Bernardino Valley College in California, wrote in 1966 that at Dachau "the prisoners were the actual instruments that inflicted the barbarities on their fellow prisoners." [14]

'Gas Chambers'

In December 1944 US Army officers Colonel Paul Kirk and Lt. Colonel Edward J. Gully inspected the German concentration camp at Struthof-Natzweiler in Alsace. They submitted their findings to their superiors, who subsequently forwarded their report to the US War Crimes Division. While, significantly, the full text of their report has never been published, it has been revealed, by a historian supportive of Holocaust claims, that the two investigators were careful to characterize equipment exhibited to them by French informants as a "so-called lethal gas chamber," and to claim it was "allegedly used as a lethal gas chamber." [15] (Emphasis added)

Both the careful phraseology of the Natzweiler report, and its effective suppression, stand in stark contrast to the credulity, the confusion, and the blaring publicity that accompanied official reports of alleged gas chambers at Dachau. At first, a US Army photo depicting a GI gazing at a steel door marked with a skull and crossbones and the German words for: "Caution! Gas! Mortal danger! Don't open!," was identified as showing the murder weapon. [16]

Later, however, it was evidently decided that the apparatus in question was merely a standard delousing chamber for clothing, and another alleged gas chamber, this one cunningly disguised as a shower room, was exhibited to American congressmen and journalists as the site where thousands breathed their last. While there exist numerous reports in the press as to the operation of this second "gas chamber," no official report by trained Army investigators has yet surfaced to reconcile such problems as the function of the shower heads: Were they "dummies," or did lethal cyanide gas stream through them? (Each theory has appreciable support in journalistic and historiographical literature.)

As with Dachau, so with Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, and the other camps liberated by the Allies in western Germany. There was no end of propaganda about "gas chambers," "gas ovens," and the like, but so far not a single detailed description of the murder weapon and its function, not a single report of the kind that is mandatory for the successful prosecution of any assault or murder case in America at that time and today, has come to light.

Furthermore, a number of Holocaust authorities have now publicly decreed that there were no gassings, no extermination camps in Germany after all. (We are now told that "gassing" and "extermination" camps were located exclusively in what is now Poland, in areas captured by the Soviet Red Army and made off-limits to western investigators.)

Dr. Martin Broszat of the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary History, which is funded by the German government, stated categorically in a 1960 letter to the German weekly Die Zeit: "Neither in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other prisoners gassed." [17] Professional "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal stated in 1975 and again in 1993 that "there were no extermination camps on German soil." [18]

Dachau "gas chamber" No. 2, which was once presented to a stunned and grieving world as a weapon that claimed hundreds of thousands of lives, is now described in the brochure issued to tourists at the modern Dachau "memorial site" in these words: "This gas chamber, camouflaged as a shower room, was not used." [19]

The Propaganda Intensifies

More than 50 years after American troops entered Dachau, Buchenwald and other German camps, and trained American investigators established the facts as to what had gone on in them, the government in Washington, the entertainment media in Hollywood, and the print media in New York continue to churn out millions of words and images annually on the horrors of the camps and the infamy of the Holocaust. Despite the fact that, with the exception of the defeated Confederacy, no enemy of America has ever so suffered so complete and devastating defeat as did Germany in 1945, the mass media and the politicians and bureaucrats behave as if Hitler, his troops, and his concentration camps continue to exist in an eternal present, and our opinion makers continue to distort, through ignorance or malice, the facts about the camps.

Time for the Truth

It is time that the government and the professional historians reveal the facts about Dachau, Buchenwald and the other camps. It is time they let the American public know how the inmates died, and how they didn't die. It is time that the claims of mass murder by gassing are clarified and investigated in the same manner as any other claims of murder. It is time that the free ride certain groups have enjoyed as the result of unchallenged Holocaust claims be terminated, just as it is time to end the scapegoating of other groups, including Germans, eastern Europeans, the Roman Catholic hierarchy, and the wartime leadership of America and Britain, either for their alleged role in the Holocaust or their supposed failure to stop it.

Above all, it is time that the citizens of this great Republic have the facts about the camps, facts they have a right to know, a right that is fundamental to the exercise of their authority and their will in the governance of their country. As citizens and as taxpayers, Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, of all faiths, have a basic right and an overriding interest in determining the facts of incidents that are deemed by those in positions of power to be significant in determining America's foreign and educational policy, as well as its selection of past events to be memorialized in our civic life.

Today the alleged facts of the Holocaust are at issue all over the civilized world. The truth will be decided only by recourse to the facts, in the public forum: not by concealing the facts, denying the truth, stonewalling reality. The truth will out, and it is time the government of this country, and governments and international bodies throughout the world, make public the evidence of what actually transpired in the German concentration camps in the years 1933-1945, so that we may put paid to the lies, without fear or favor, and carry out the work of reconciliation and renewal that is and must be the granite foundation of mutual tolerance between peoples and of a peace based on justice.

Summary

The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth about the wartime German concentration camps have since been corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:

  1. The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the effects of Allied aerial attacks.
  2. Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp commanders and guards.
  3. On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German policy and German orders.
  4. The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and the other camps captured by the Soviets.


 

Notes

1. John D. McCallum, Crime Doctor [a biography of Dr. Charles P. Larson] (Mercer, Wash.: The Writing Works, 1978), pp. 44-46, 59, 69; See also: J. Cobden, "The Dachau Gas Chamber Myth," The Journal of Historical Review, March-April 1995, pp. 17-18.

2. Jane Floerchinger, "Concentration Camp Conditions Killed Most Inmates, Doctor Says," The Wichita Eagle, April 1, 1980, p. 4C.

3. J. D. McCallum, Crime Doctor (1978), p. 46.

4. The Wichita Eagle, April 1, 1980, p. 4C.

5. John E. Gordon, "Louse-Borne Typhus Fever in the European Theater of Operations, U.S. Army, 1945," in Forest Ray Moulton, editor, Rickettsial Diseases of Man (Washington, DC: American Academy for the Advancement of Science, 1948), pp. 16-27. Quoted in: Friedrich P. Berg, "Typhus and the Jews," The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1988-89, pp. 444-447, and in Arthur Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (IHR, 1993), pp. 46-47.

6. "Disease killed Nazis' prisoners, MD says," Toronto Star, Feb. 8, 1985, p. A2. On Barton's similar testimony in a 1988 Toronto trial, see: Barbara Kulaszka, ed., Did Six Million Really Die? (Toronto: Samisdat, 1992), pp. 175-180, and, Robert Lenski, The Holocaust on Trial (1990), pp. 157-160, and, M. Weber, "Bergen-Belsen Camp: The Suppressed Story," The Journal of Historical Review, May-June 1995, pp. 27, 30 (n. 30).

7. "Clay Explains Cut in Ilse Koch Term," The New York Times, Sept. 24, 1948, p. 3.

8. Interview with Lucius Clay, 1976, Official Proceeding of the George C. Marshall Research Foundation. Quoted in M. Weber, "Buchenwald: Legend and Reality," The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1986-87 (Vol. 7, No. 4), pp. 406-407.

9. International Military Tribunal (IMT), Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949 ["blue series"]), Vol. 20, pp. 489, 438.

10. Eugen Kogon, The Theory and Practice of Hell (New York: Berkley Books [pb.], 1984), pp. 108-109. See also: "Punishment for Mistreating SS Camp Prisoners," The Journal of Historical Review, Jan.-Feb. 1995, p. 33.

11. Nuremberg document NO-1523. Published in Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunal (NMT "green series"), Vol. 4, pp. 372-373.

12. Egon W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, Buchenwald: A Preliminary Report, US Army, 12th Army Group, April 24, 1945. National Archives, RG 331, SHAEF, G-5, 17.11, Jacket 10, Box 151. Quoted in: M. Weber, "Buchenwald: Legend and Reality," The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1986-87, pp. 408-409.

13. Donald B. Robinson, "Communist Atrocities at Buchenwald," American Mercury, October 1946, pp. 397-404.

14. San Bernardino Sun-Telegram, March 13, 1966. Quoted in: James J. Martin, The Man Who Invented 'Genocide' (IHR, 1984), pp. 110-111.

15. "Concentration Camp at Natzwiller [sic]," RG 331, Records of Allied Operations and Occupation, SHAEF/G-5/2717, Modern Military, National Archives (Washington, DC). Quoted in: Robert H. Abzug, Inside the Vicious Heart (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985), pp. 9-10, 181 (n. 5).

16. John Cobden, Dachau: Reality and Myth (IHR, 1994), pp. 25-29. See also: The Journal of Historical Review, May-June 1993, pp. 9-11; The Journal of Historical Review, March- April 1995, p. 16.

17. "Keine Vergasung in Dachau," Die Zeit (Hamburg), August 19, 1960. Facsimile reprint, and English-language translation, in The Journal of Historical Review, May-June 1993, p. 12.

18. Letters in Books & Bookmen (London), April 1975, p. 5, and in The Stars and Stripes (European edition), Jan. 24, 1993, p. 14. Wiesenthal's 1993 Stars and Stripes letter is reprinted in facsimile in The Journal of Historical Review, May-June 1993, p. 10.

19. Memorial Site Concentration Camp Dachau. Leaflet published by the International Dachau-Committee (Dachau, Germany), no date.


 


About the Author

Theodore J. O'Keefe is the author of numerous published articles, essays and reviews on historical and political subjects. For some years he served as editor of the IHR's Journal of Historical Review.
 


#2007

This essay, here slightly edited, is from The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1995 (Vol. 15, no. 4), pp. 18-23.

 

 
Back to top

 

 

 

Myron Fagan - 1967: A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century   8 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhFJafQ4pCY
 
Myron Fagan exposes the Illuminati/CFR [1967]  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrUXPn7HCjM                     2 hours 32 minutes


Plus, here's David Carroll pointing out the irony that a white female NAACP leader passing herself off as black is nothing new for the organization created and funded by white liberals and political Jews 
In defense of NAACP's Rachel Dolezal 
      21 minutes

(Willie Martin, A Darker View of the Issue 
Fagan Outs the Illuminati CFR
On line books by Myron Fagan

  See also my "Communist Takeover Began Long Ago"

and "Red Rose Parks-
Fabricating an American Icon" 

JULYJEW WATCH-2015

H [[SURELY IT IS TIME THAT THE REPUTED FREE PRESS OF TODAY BROUGHT TRUTH TO THE SURFACE ON THE MATTER OF THE NAZI CONCENTRATION CAMPS AS THEY ARE SLOWLY DOING ON MANY OTHER MATTERS INSTEAD OF ALLOWING AN UNTRUTH TO BE HIDDEN AS IT HAS BEEN ON THE FULL FACTS ON THE CAUSES OF DEATH IN THE NAZI CAMPS SINCE THE END OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR WHICH HAS ALLOWED THE PERPETUATION OF A WELL-HIDDEN POWERFUL FINANCIAL AND POLITICAL EVIL IDEOLOGY WHICH DOMINATES THE MEDIA IN THE WESTERN WORLD. STILL IN PLACE , BUT NOW UNRAVELLING , WHICH HAS BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR ALMOST ALL POLITICAL UPHEAVALS AND WARS  FOR WELL OVER TWO-AND-A HALF -CENTURIES.]

IS IT NOT TIME THAT THE REPUTED FREE PRESS

1)Protocols

of

ZION

 

2)

ZIONISM

 

 

 

 
     
     IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!  -LATEST! - NOVEMBER 11 IS A DAY TO REMEMBER OF THE SACRIFICE OF OVER 2,000,000 servicemen and women who gave their lives in DEFENCE OF THEIR COUNTRY in TWO WORLD WARS and the countless INJURED many bearing the SCARS and TRAUMA for the REST OF THEIR LIVES - IT HAS BEEN CONSTANTLY STATED that the EU would PREVENT WAR in EUROPE but the REALITY is DIFFERENT as it was NATO which kept THE PEACE until GERMANY went to aid her SECOND WORLD WAR ALLY CROATIA and the BULKANS exploded with ALBANIA and SERBIA at each others throats as old scores were being settled.  + OVER THE PAST CENTURY  OVER 150,000,000 PEOPLE HAVE DIED THE GREATER MAJORITY IN RUSSIA IN THE GULAGS It is stated that whereas the FASCISTS MURDERED at least 50,000,000 the COMMUNISTS MURDERED at least 100,000,000.  +In the DAILY MAIL on this UNFORGETTABLE DAY  we see an article 'THE END OF BRITAIN AS A NATION STATE?  NOT ON YOUR LIFE - MR RUMPY PUMPY. and we show the the following extract :- 'History teaches us that nation states  have always been the best guarantors of LIBERTTY-DEMOCRACY-PROSPERITY and THE RULE OF LAW.    ONLY STRONG NATION STATES HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DEFEND THEIR LIBERTIES AGAINST SUCH AS NAPOLEON - HITLER OR STALIN - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328568/Nation-states-dead-EU-chief-says-belief-countries-stand-lie.html

+[PREVIOUS STATEMENT]
   -WE NOW HAVE TO ALERT YOU! TO WATCH ALEX JONES OF PRISON PLANET.COM - -THE FREEDOM LOBBY IN THE USA. - WE HAVE ONLY IN THE PAST WEEK IN JULY 2010 COME ACROSS ANOTHER FEARLESS FREEDOM FIGHTER IN THE USA AN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN BORN A JEW BROTHER NATHANAEL KAPNER WHO MORE THAN MOST IS WELL AWARE OF THE THREAT FROM THE WORLD ZIONIST CONSPIRACY AS HIS MANY ARTICLES ON HIS WEBSITEa href="http://www.realzionist">http://www.realzionistnews.com

"REAL ZIONIST NEWS" CAN TESTIFY.- IT COULD SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -YOUR LIVELIHOOD AND EVEN YOUR LIFE! - JUST FOR ONCE MAKE TIME TO SEE POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO THAT YOU WILL EVER WATCH IN YOUR LIFE! - THE ISSUES ARE MOMENTOUS AND AFFECT EVERY ONE ON OUR PLANET. - MUCH YOU WILL LEARN WILL ASTOUND YOU AND SURPRISE YOU WHEN YOU HEAR HOW THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WHO HAVE BEEN PLANNING THEIR FINANCIAL COUP FOR OVER TWO CENTURIES AND A HALF TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH AN ELITE! OLIGARTHY IN A WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE WORLD'S WEALTHIEST ABD MOST POWERFUL AND LATER TO DISPOSE OF AT LEAST 85% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION. - THESE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ARE PRAYING TO SATAN TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM YOU! - TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - IN FACT YOU HAVE JUST TWO YEARS TO RALLY YOUR NEIGHBOURS TO THE TRUTH AS AN INSIDER HAS STATED THAT THE ELITE HAVE THEIR OWN ETHICS WHICH IS TO USE THEIR HOLLYWOOD EMPIRE TO PUT OUT WAR FILMS OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS SHOWING HOW THEY INTEND THEIR PURPOSE -  SO YOU HAVE THAT LONG! TO SAVE YOURSELF! - YOUR FAMILY! -YOUR FRIENDS! AND ALL FELLOW BEINGS ON OUR PLANET FROM THE SATANIC OLIGARTHY WHO WISH TO RULE THE WORLD THEIR WAY!- THE VIDEO WILL DETAIL IN ITS 2 HOUR VIDEO PRESENTATION 'THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC'. - IF YOU TURN YOUR FACE AWAY NOW!.-.YOU WILL SUFFER FOR IT!.- WE ARE CONVINCED THAT MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY ARE UNAWARE OF WHAT IS HAPPENNING TO THEIR COUNTRY - NATURALLY THEY ARE LOOKING TO SURVIVE IN ONE OF THE WORST RECESSIONS IN LIVING MEMORY OR HISTORY WNICH HAS BEEN ENGINEERED BY THE ILLUMINATI WHICH INCLUDES THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE - THE MAIN MONEY LENDERS IN THE WORLD SINCE THEIR 18TH CENTURY AND LATER INTRIGUES IN BAVARIA IN THE 19TH CENTURY AND HAVE SUPPORTED BOTH SIDES OF MAJOR WARS AND NO DOUBT SMALLER WARS IN ORDER TO INCREASE THEIR WEALTH AND POWER.- THEIR MAJOR TRIUMPH WAS TO GET THE UNITED NATIONS OFF THE GROUND AFTER WORLD WAR II BY ROCKEFELLER WHO OWNED THE LAND WHICH HE OFFERED IN ORDER THAT THE UN BUILDING COULD BE BUILT IN NEW YORK - SINCE THEN ALL UN ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN PART OF THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION WHICH ENGINNERED A PANDEMIC WHEN THE PREVIOUS CRITERA HAD NOT BEEN REACHED AND WORLD MONETARY FUND AND THE ELITE WHICH IS MADE UP OF OVER 6000 OF THE RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD WHO TO ASSIST THEM HAVE THEIR SERVANTS IN POLITICS - ACADEMICS -PRESS AND MEDIA AND FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE  - THE BILDERBERGERS IN ALL YOUR MAIN POLITIOCAL PARTIES TO DO THEIR BIDDING - SUCH AS GORDON BROWN - ED BALLS - PETER MANDELSON - DAVID MILIBAND AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR AND IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY -  KENNETH CLARKE - GEORGE OSBORNE - WILLIAM HAGUE -http://www.bilderberg.org/Bilderberg2009. WILLIAM HAGUE - DOUGLAS HURD - AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND NOT FORGETTING THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WITH PADDY ASHDOWN AND OTHERS WHO BY THEIR COMPLICITY INTEND BY VARIOUS MEANS - WAR - TOXIC VACCINES [MERCURY}- POVERTY (DESTRUCTION OF INDUSTRY -CAP AND TRADE) - POLLUTED WATER SUPPLIES- {FLUORIDE A POISON AND OTHER POLLUTANTS - TOXIC AIR SPRAYING AND DETENTION AS IN AMERICA WHERE THERE ARE NOW DETENTION CENTRES OR TO BE MORE PRECISE CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN MANY STATES ACROSS AMERICA IT IS OBVIOUS THE MAN IN THE STREET IS UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE DISASTER AWAITING THEM!  - IN OUR SMALL WAY WE AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR MANY YEARS AS ALEX JONES -PRISON PLANET.COM AND INFOWARS>COM AND MANY OTHER BRAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHEN THEY DISAPEAR FROM SIGHT - YOU WILL TRULY DOOMED TO SLAVERY OR DEATH.- IN OUR OWN ONE MAN CAMPAIGN 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' WE HAVE WITNESSED THE TOTAL IGORANCE OF THE PUBLIC TO WHAT IS IN STORE FOR THEM!  - AT LEAST WE WILL KNOW WHY! - BUT MILLIONS WILL BE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER AS SHEEPLE AND IT WILL ONLY DAWN ON SOME THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN NOTICE WHEN THEY COULD AND MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE FREE PEOPLE'S OF OUR WORLD! WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED BY OUR PARLIAMENT AND MONARCH - YOU ARE ONLY MONTH'S AWAY FROM LOSING YOUR ANCIENT FREEDOMS - YOUR UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY OF OVER 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING! - UNLESS YOU STIR YOURSELVES!          WE WARNED YOU PRIOR TO THE GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 THAT IT COULD BE THE LAST! - AS LISBON TREATY SAYS SO! - AS REGIONS/PROVINCES WILL BE THE ORDER OF THE DAY - BUT WE NOW KNOW THAT DAVID CAMERERON HAS STOOD DOWN THE REGIONAL ASSEMBLIES AT THE PRESENT TIME BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE WOULD NOT GET AWAY PROCEEDING WITH THEM AFTER HIS STANCE ABOUT NO MORE LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY TO BRUSSELS-WELL!-NOT YET! AS WE STATED WHETHER YOU VOTED NEW LABOUR - CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS YOU HAVE AGREED TO LOSE YOUR INHERITED SACRED 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN' - WHICH SHOULD BE PASSED ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS -  BECAUSE THEY WOULD RATHER 'SELLETH HIS BIRTHRIGHT FOR A MESS OF POTTAGE' WE NOW HEAR THAT THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY MACHINE IS BAFFLED AS TO WHY IT DID NOT DO BETTER AT THE POLLS.- BECAUSE THEY BETRAYED THOSE EUROSCEPTICS WHO HAD BELIEVED THEM OVER 38 YEARS THAT THEY WOULD CHANGE THE EU BUT APART FROM BRUSSELS GIVING GROUND ON CERTAIN MATTERS AND ONLY FOR AS LONG AS THEY FIND IT NECESSARY - THE CLOSER UNION WILL STILL GO AHEAD AS PLANNED.- AS WE HAVE STATED ELSEWHERE IT IS ALL ABOUT GRADUALISM . THE PEOPLE HAVE FAILED TO REALISE THAT EVERY SO-CALLED COMPROMISE WORKS TO THE BENEFIT OF BRUSSELS -THE EVIDENCE WAS CLEAR ON THE 1 JANUARY 2010 WHEN ENGLAND NO LONGER EXISTED AS A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE BUT REGIONS SHARED BY OTHER EUROPEAN REGIONS.  ONLY GERMANY HAS ESCAPED SUCH INIHILATION AND IRONICALLY IT WILL BE GERMANY WHICH MIGHT WITH THE COLLAPSE OF THE EURO AND THE IMERGENCE OF GERMAN IDENTITY AT HOME THAT MIGHT BRING BACK THE FREE INDEPENDENDEBNT NATION STATES WORKING TOGETHER FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY-  BUT BEFORE THIS CAN TAKE PLACE THERE IS A HERCULEAN TASK BEFORE US TO REGAIN FROM THE ZIONIST BANKSTERS THE CONTROL OF THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS IN THE WORLD BECAUSE WITHOUT DOING SO FREEDOM AND EVEN THE LIVES OF MOST OF MANKIND WILL DISAPEAR FOR EVER FROM OUR PLANET.ART OF                           MAIN ISSUES BULLETIN-UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                           EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                            THE LISBON TREATY HAS BEEN RATIFIED BY ALL!     YOUR PENALTY IS BE SLAVERY! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU! -  AS ON DECEMBER 1-2009 THE TREATY CAME INTO BEING AND ENGLAND DISAPPEARED FROM HISTORY AND EVEN FROM THE MAP OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE AND LOST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL IN THE BAD BARGAIN! - THANKS TO A TRAITOROUS SCOTSMAN GORDON BROWN WHO WITH HIS TARTAN CLAN HAS CERTAINLY TAKEN REVENGE FOR PAST TIMES!               Click           Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the           1999 European Elections.               Click           Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                 LINKS FROM BULLETIN FILE TO OTHER FILES!    nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ONLY MILLIONS ON THE STREETS CAN NOW SAVE US NOW! - BUT THERE IS NO LEADER OF FREEDOM TO COMPARE WITH OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL - TO RALLY THE PEOPLE! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!     OVER 1'600 BULLETIN'S! AVAILABLE HERE!
UNITY OF ENGLISH PARTIES?                MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!                Click Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the 1999 European Elections.               Click Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!
 
     
 
 

HOW LONG BEFORE THE EU ELECTION  IN  MAY 2014 AND THE GENERAL ELECTION IN MAY 2015

IN ORDER TO ASSIST YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT THE EU WE ARE PROVIDING INFORMATION ON THIS CHART SINCE APRIL 2013-OUT OF THE 120 MONTHS OF BULLETINS SINCE 2003.

 

APRIL13 MAY13 JUNE13 JULY13 AUG13 SEP13 OCT13 NOV13 DEC13 JAN14 FEB14 MAR14 APRIL14

26    

25     

24  

23 

22   

21   

  20 19 18   17  16    15  14
MAY14 JUNE14 JULY14 AUG14 SEP14 OCT14 NOV14 DEC14 JAN15 FEB15 MARCH15 APRIL15  MAY15
13 12  11    10  9

8

 7  6   5

 4  

3

2

  1
 

HOW LONG BEFORE THE EU REFERENDUM  IN  MAY 2017?

IN ORDER TO ASSIST YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT THE EU WE ARE PROVIDING INFORMATION ON  THIS CHART FROM MAY 2015 TO MAY 2017.

 

APRIL15 MAY15 JUNE15 JULY15 AUG15 SEP15 OCT15 NOV15 DEC15 JAN16 FEB16 MAR16 APRIL16

2

 1

24

23

22

21

20 19 18 17 16 15 14
MAY16 JUNE16 JULY16 AUG16 SEP16 OCT16 NOV16 DEC16 JAN17 FEB17 MARCH17 APRIL17  MAY17
13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
 
ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

 

In 1962,

 Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality 

 HITLER'S plan for Europe

 under

GERMAN CONTROL.

*

DID YOU KNOW?

206

GERMANY HAS PLAYED ITS EU MEMBERSHIP VERY CLEVERLY..

The Germans, unlike other Europeans, have kept themselves an OPT OUT clause if things go wrong.  The 16 provincial governments within Germany control most things within their regions. The federal German government cannot act without unanimous approval from the 16.  The 16 German provinces have NEVER SIGNED ANY AGREEMENT WITH THE EU. It was the federal German government which signed up.

IF THINGS GO BADLY WRONG THE INDIVIDUAL REGIONS CAN LEAVE THE EU.

[As we have stated many times it is better for ENGLAND to leave the EU

-FIRST!

-because that is what the German government fears the

MOST!

AS TO THE OTHER NATION STATES WITHIN THE UK THEY SHOULD ALL HAVE A VOICE OF THEIR OWN!-TO DENY THEM THEIR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS!   SHOULD BE NO PART OF ENGLAND'S ROLE IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENDUM ON LEAVING THE EU.]

285

 

A Dozen Great English Politicians Who Would Have fought Against the Euro And The EU

Winston Churchill

Benjamin Disraeli

William Pitt (the younger)

William Pitt (the elder)

Robert Walpole

Robert Peel

Ernest Bevin

Viscount Palmerston

Oliver Cromwell

Clement Attlee

Herbert Asquith

Stanley Baldwin

*
 

A PATRIOT

-A MAN OF COMMON SENSE - SEEKER OF TRUTH

 

Mail's ex-City editor Andrew Alexander dies at 80

 

 

***

 

 

AND THOSE  TRAITORS GIVING THEIR COUNTRY AWAY

ALL PRIME MINISTERS SINCE AND INCLUDING EDWARD HEATH WHO  WAS A NAZI SPY FOR OVER 67 YEARS AND BEFORE HIS

 DEATH IN 2005

PUBLICLY ADMITTED HE HAD LIED TO THE PEOPLE. ONLY MARGARET THATCHER LATE IN THE DAY FINALLY REALISED THE DANGER OF A 'CLOSER UNION' AND THE 'BRUTUS' HOWE AND OTHERS STABBED HER IN THE BACK-HER HISTORIC 'FALKLANDS VICTORY' COULD NOT SAVE HER FROM TRAITORS! AT HOME.
 

[AS WE HAVE STATED OVER MANY YEARS

 THE UK FOREIGN OFFICE

 IS IN FACT

A 'FOREIGN' OFFICE

OF THE EU.]

 

Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond has gone pro EU as Euro-Phil
Daily Mail - 1 day ago

Philip Hammond, not long before he became FOREIGN SECRETARY last July...he seemed to go native (though he did on one occasion remind us-he'd...and passion that has no equivalent in any other department of state...the crack-up of the Community was a heaven-sent chance for Britain to...

TREASON

 

 

Est. 1994-Policies-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-Top Topics and Stats

     

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

FREEDOM CORNER

WORLD AFFAIRS

 THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

     

TOP OF PAGE

AUGUST  PART ONE-2015

TO RETURN TO PART ONE

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

NEILKEENAN.

COM

 

WHISTLEBLOWER.

ORG

DIVINECOSMOS.

COM

GLOBALRESEARCH.

CA/CO