ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC

PARTY

BULLETINS & VIEWERS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Established 1994-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-Top Topics and Stats

 PART ONE -1994 -Official Website-2014 - PART TWO  

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 

PART 2 -  AUGUST-2014

 

 

'SPOTLIGHT 'ZONE

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS IS THE TRUE BEGINNING OF OUR BATTLE TO WAGE WAR ON THE GANG OF THREE IN WESTMINSTER WHO HAVE ENSLAVED THE ENGLISH PEOPLE ONCE ONE OF THE FREEST PEOPLES IN THE WORLD  IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE. AND THE DOOR CAN BE OPENED TO THAT FREEDOM IF ALL WHO LOVE FREEDOM WHATEVER THEIR PAST POLITICAL LEANING OR NONE TO GRASP THIS TIMELY OPPORTUNITY TO CHANGE OUR SOILED POLITICAL SYSTEM FOR A BETTER AND MORE SECURE AND PROSPEROUS FUTURE WITH

 A DEMOCRACY SUITABLE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY WHERE THE PEOPLE WILL REIGN AND NOT THE BANKSTERS AND THEIR MINIONS.

 

 

 

Mr Carswell has taken up the long discarded torch of freedom for others like himself and others to at long last go into battle united aginst the Nazi inspired plan of Adolf Hitler  who when it was suspected that the war would be lost  brought forward the PLAN

 of creating a new GERMAN led NEW EUROPE of a collectivist uniform nonentity calling itself the European Union.  It is stated

 that 'Herman Goering who made the first reference to the European Economic Community  Goering is the true father of the ECC, though europhiles tend to forget to give him the credit.  

 

History recalls an incident in France in the closing days of the Second World War when the French people came out of their homes to fight for THEIR FREEDOM and THEIR COUNTRY and this would remain with THEM and THEIR CHILDREN for the rest of THEIR LIVES. YOU! are not called to put your life at risk which we are sure many of you would do if your country was under attack from troops of another country. Possibly you are not aware that this might well happen in the future if it was necessay for the EU to quell insurection in the PROVINCES of BRITAIN would could well be done by troops from other countries within the EU.

 Far BETTER for the ENGLISH PEOPLE to SECUREsecure their SAFETY in THEIR OWN FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

 

 

Our great war leader gave the answer

You ask, What is our aim?

I can answer in one word:

 

"VICTORY"

 

- victory at all costs,

 

Victory, in spite of all terror;

 

VICTORY however long and hard the road may be; for without

VICTORY, there is no survival. "

 

[of England the once home of the FREE.]

 

Winston Churchill-May 1940

In 1962, Field Marshal Montgomery found Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the (so called )Common Market

 

THE CHOICE IS YOURS!

MR CARSWELL HAS SHOWN YOU THE WAY'

WE MUST GO FORWARD TO VICTORY!

 DEFEAT WE MUST NEVER ACCEPT.

 

DO IT!

 

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

 AUGUST 28-2014

H F 306

 

 

 

 
 

Nigel Farage, the leader of Britain's anti-EU party UKIP, enjoys a pint of beer as he celebrates after a hustings event at The Oddfellows Hall in Ramsgate, south east England August 26, 2014. Farage who is seeking a seat in parliament, was chosen by his party to run in a southern constituency controlled by the ruling Conservatives.  REUTERS/Dylan Martinez  (BRITAIN - Tags: POLITICS)

Article

Nigel Farage vows to RESIGN as UKIP leader if the party fails to breakthrough in next year's general election 

By Tom Mctague, Mailonline Deputy Political Editor - August 27th 2014, 5:30:22 pm

The UKIP leader said there was ‘not one ounce of complacency from me’ after he was selected last night to stand in the South Thanet seat for UKIP at next year's general election.

[AND SO HE SHOULD!

because it has been the lack-lustre attitude  over DECADES of so -called LEADERS of UKIP not realising or more possibly under orders from their employer the CONSERVATIVE PARTY to forestall any real progress for as long as the SECRET is KEPT which has now been fully REVEALED.

It is  a WAR we are FIGHTING for the RETURN of our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.  There can be no greater BATTLE but that which concerns the FREEDOM OF A COUNTRY which is

ENGLAND .]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 29-2014

H F 305

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why I as a Christian believe we Must-

banish evil British jihadis from these shores-

Says former-Archbishop-Canterbury.

1. Lord Carey wants those involved in terrorism to lose their passports

[2.WE have not included item 2 as it is strongly contradicted (*) below]

 3.Muslim communities are being pressured to discipline their young

by Lord Carey forMAIL ON SUNDAY

EXTRACT

(*)...By embracing multiculturalism and the idea that every culture and belief is of equal value

WE HAVE BETRAYED OUR OWN TRADITIONS

of welcoming strangers to

OUR SHORE..

The strangers we welcome were attracted to

OUR WAY OF LIFE

and

DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS.

They were escaping

TOTALITARIANISM

and

RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION

and  wanted to come to a country where there was

FREEDOM OF RELIGION

and separation of the power of

CHURCH

STATE

and

JUDICIARY

They also came to one of the only countries in Europe where there was an

ESTABLISHED CHURCH.

The establishment of the Church didn't mean other

BELIEFS

were not welcome but it did offer hospitality for a range of diverse beliefs...

This year we are reminded by the commemoration of

TWO WORLD WARS

that the

VALUES

of our

DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS

are

PRECIOUS

Our fathers and grandfathers-including many thousands of Muslims from around the

Commonwealth

Fought against

TOTALITARISM

for the survival of DEMOCRATIC VIRTUES.

The bloody advance of IS is a reminder that

TOTALITARISM

 Is far from

DEAD

OUR FIGHT CONTINUES.

 

More!

 

 

 

You Can't Separate Politics from Morals

 

[What we have in the Middle East today is reminiscent of the time of the Christian Crusades]

 

Multicultural polices have effectively divided the population into ethnic and faith communities

 

Multiculuralism is no longer right for Britain by CRE Head Trevor Phillips [IT NEVER WAS.]

 

Christianity is more than a Religion it is the main cultural force which makes us what we are.

 

 

IMMIGRATION-THE BETRAYAL OF BRICK LANE BY MULTICULTURALISM INSTEAD OF INTEGRATION

 

 

Quit Britain if you want Shariah Law says Trevor Phillips

[THE DIDNT LEAVE-THERE ARE 50+ SHARIA COURTS IN ENGLAND.

 

 

WHAT A BETRAYAL of the SUBURBS that once gave [ENGLAND] its IDENTITY-its COHESION-its RESPECT

 

 

Immigration flood'fuelling more hostility

 

Muliticulturalism: not only a fraud-but also DANGEROUS!

OUR PAST is embedded in our NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS-It asks-WERE WE CAME FROM and WHO WE ARE.

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

 

*

 

[It  must be widely known by  many Christians and others that at the time of the CRUSADES and for centuries later millions  of innocent people where slaughtered  in the name of the CATHOLIC CHURCH. In so-called modern times Christian countries have illegally invaded Muslim countries causing much loss of innocent life and property. From the Seventh Century with the rise of ISLAM millions of innocent people people were slaughtered in order for them to extend their ISLAMIC EMPIRE touching Africa and parts of Europe. The core of each religion is its TRUE MESSAGE

 

GOODNESS and SERVICE.

 

A better  nominative for both religions would be

FOLLOWERS of JESUS and FOLLOWERS of Mohammed.

Much research on Christian doctrine  has brought  forth  much doubt as to the authenticity of much that is in the biblical text (*... "and in the Islamic text it is recorded in the history of Islam that Abu Daoud, who collected some 500,000 traditions concerning Mohammed rejected all but 4,800,which included" the authentic, those which seem to be authentic, and those which are nearly so" This again, it may be argued, proves that false traditions do not negate the historicity of the personage they concern...")

 

(*) THE HISTORICAL JESUS - J.M. ROBERTSON

.

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 24 19-2014

 

 

 

 LETTER TO THE LETTERS SECTION OF THE DAILY MAIL-MONDAY,AUGUST 25,2014

COMPLY or DIE

FOR generations, the British people have welcomed people of all nations to share their life and economy

It is true that not everyone liked the new arrivals, but the immigrants integrated, embraced democracy and contributed to society in what was essentially a Christian country and which was viewed as such by those incomers.

Recently, these dynamics have been changed drastically by the emergence of a belligerent, vocal, fundamentalist Islam. These are not ignorant peasants, but include intelligent, well-educated individuals, who are fanatical in their beliefs, unafraid to die and capable of using the civil liberties and human rights laws to pursue their objectives.

Why haven't the hard-working family-orientated Muslims, many of whom are second and third generation citizens, raised their voices and rejected them? The answer is simple:

FEAR.

Look around the world and see what Muslim is capable of doing to Muslim Families fear the radicalisation of their young and repercussions of raising their head above the parapet.

Fundamentalist Islam

is a

TOTALITARIAN SOCIETY

 where the choice is simple:

COMPLY or DIE

You cannot blame law-abiding  and fearful Muslims for

KEEPING QUIET

when the British authorities are unwilling or incapable of action because the very laws EUROPE  has passed to protect DEMOCRACY and eliminate racism are CLEVERLY manipulated by

EXTREMISTS to pursue their own AGENDA

How many church bells have been silenced because Muslims were offended by the sound of them? How many people have been told not to wear crosses in the workplace because it could be considered offensive to Muslims?

The question is which Muslims?

 Certainly not my neighbours.

Women are permitted in this country to walk about in public with their faces entirely covered but this is not a requirement of the KORAN as interpreted by most Muslims and not a requirement in a great many Muslim countries

Radical religious teachers are allowed to indoctrinate Muslim children, young men and women are persuaded to go and fight abroad for

 TERRORIST ORGANISATIONS

and then return as full citizens with their rights intact.

Are the British authorities so blind that they cannot see what is happening under their noses. Perhaps when the flag of the

CALIPHATE

is flying above civic buildings they will realise thety have the choice of

'COMPLY or DIE'

Name supplied, Manchester

*

[The majority of politicians turn a blind eye because they wont the votes and until the Human Rights legislation is scrapped and we leave the EU it is very unlikely that anything will change.   We understand the reluctance of many Muslims to intervene and  keep under cover knowing the character of the opposition but with such a dangerous situation at the present time it is going to get even worse in the near future so they need to oppose the radical teachers in the

Mosques

as it is most vital that

democratically minded Muslims

 must  fight for what they believe in- as there is no other practical way out of the present impasse except that they

VOTE FOR UKIP

who want

OUT OF THE EU AND THE  HUMAN RIGHTS LAW SCRAPPED

*

 

 

 

{COMMENTS IN BRACKETS -CAPS AND HIGHLIGHTING ARE OURS!

H F 54

 

H F 228

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE:

AS WITH ALL OUR MONTHLY BULLETINS -OVER 2000 SINCE 2003 -YOU WILL FIND INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHLY BULLETINS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.

[WITH A GENERAL ELECTION IN MAY 2015 ESSENTIAL MONTHLY INFORMATION WILL BE RETAINED

FURTHER INFO 

WILL APPEAR SHORTLY IN

PT2/ 3/4/5/6

 WE ARE INCREASING EACH MONTH'S BULLETINS TO 6 PARTS IN ORDER TO SHOW MORE INFORMATION ON THE EU.

work in progress

JUNE-2014

HOW LONG BEFORE THE EU ELECTION  IN  MAY 2014 AND THE

GENERAL ELECTION IN MAY 2015

IN ORDER TO ASSIST YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT THE EU WE ARE PROVIDING INFORMATION ON

 THIS CHART SINCE APRIL 2013-OUT OF THE 120 MONTHS OF BULLETINS SINCE 2003.

APR13

MAY13

JUN13

JUL13

AUG13

SEP13

OCT13

NOV13

DEC13

JAN14

FEB14

MAR14

APR14

26    

25    

24  

23 

22   

21   

  20

19

18

17

16

15

 14

MAY14

JUN14

JUL14

AUG14

SEP14

OCT14

NOV14

DEC14

JAN15

FEB15

MAR15

APR15

 MAY15

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

 

 

DAILY MAIL

 

Democracy? No, Britain's now a judicial-dictatorship and it's time for

REVOLUTION

-writes-

RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN

 

EXTRACT

...We may kid ourselves that we live in a democracy, but the reality is that we are ultimately governed by a

JUDICIAL DICTATORSHIP, ACCOUNTABLE TO NO ONE

with its power base in

STRASBOURG.

Its bad enough when government policy is

RE-WRITTEN by

UNELECTED JURISTS

from countries such as the former SOVIET satellite states.wiyth no distinguished history of respect for genuine human rights.

But increasingly, British judges are flexing their muscles, too. Lord Neuberger, president of

BRITAIN'S SUPREME COURT

-a typical Blairite, European-style institution- has admitted that the

HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

has given the courts a blank cheque to

MAKE UP LAWS AS THEY GO ALONG...

More!

 

*

A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE

[THE EXCELLENT AND TIMELY ARTICLE ABOVE SHOWS IN DETAIL THE DANGERS TO OUR ONCE FREE DEMOCRACY AND THE WILLINGNESS OF THE TRAITOROUS JUDICIARY TO FORGET THE ILLEGALITIES AND CORRUPTION THAT AROSE IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 1972 ACCESSION TREATY WHICH CAME INTO EFFECT ON JANUARY 1ST 1973 AND SUBSEQUENT TREATIES WHICH ARE ILLEGAL UNDER THE

1969 VIENNA  TREATY ON THE LAW OF TREATIES

 WHICH MAKES ALL SUCH TREATIES NULL AND VOID. THE ATTITUDE OF OUR JUDGES IS SHOWN IN THE MANNER OF THE SCALES OF JUSTICE-THEY HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES TO THE TRUTH. IN OUR LONG HISTORY THERE HAVE BEEN A NUMBER OF EXAMPLES OF WHAT HAPPENED TO SUCH TRAITORS AND HOPEFULLY THE DAY WILL DAWN WHEN THEY AND OTHERS WHO HAVE SOILED THE ONCE GOOD NAME OF ENGLAND WILL RECEIVE THEIR JUST AND RIGHT PUNISHMENT. ]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 13-2014

H F 216

 

 
[IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY SO MANY POLITICIANS AND OTHERS WERE ABLE TO FOOL THE PEOPLE TO GIVE UP THEIR ONCE

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

AND

DESTROY THE MORAL FIBRE OF SOCIETY

WE ONLY HAVE TO MENTION ONE WORD

BLACKMAIL]

*

Savile & The 9th Circle: UK Paedophile Ring by

RUSSELL BURTON

[Comments in brackets are ours]

*

'Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.-'

George Washington(1732-99) Ist President of the USA.

AUGUST-2014

H F-SP-8

 

 

 

Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

 

 

 

AND

AN ENEMY WITHIN

THE GREATEST THREAT TO OUR SECURITY AND CULTURE IS FROM WITHIN BECAUSE OF THE ILLEGAL ACTIONS OF SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS IN FOREIGN POLICY AND MASS IMMIGRATION TOGETHER WITH THE SUPPORT OF POLITICALLY CORRECT LOCAL AUTHORITIES SUCH AS BIRMINGHAM AND KNOW DOUBT MANY OTHERS WHICH HAS BROUGHT WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY A CORE OF RADICAL MUSLIMS WHO HAVE BUT ONE AIM TO INFILTRATE OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THEIR AIM TO BRING A MUSLIM STATE WITH FULL SHARIA LAW TO

 ENGLAND.

 

1+2+3+4+5

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+

 

http://thisisourland.info

 

 

MARCH-2014

 

 

 

 

WHEN+WILL+ENGLAND+BE+FREE+FROM+

THE+SATANIC+COLLECTIVIST+WASTEFUL+

UNDEMOCRATIC+ENTITY+ A NATION

 DESTROYING STATE +CALLING ITSELF THE EU

+

 A +STEP+TOWARDS+A+ONE-STATE WORLD GOVERNMENT- WITH NO INDIVIDUALITY PERMITTED-A CLONED POPULATION WITH

 NO VOICE OF ITS OWN-

IS THAT WHAT YOU WANT?

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE

ESTABLISHED

IN MADRID IN 1943

By

HEINRICH HIMMLER

 

H F-SP 11

 
 
THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID NOTHING!

H F -S P 7

 

 

 

 
Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

No 1

 The leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties have been taken over by pro-Europeans. These leaderships implement the EU's policy, and ignore the wishes of their voters. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference.
 

http://eutruth.org.uk

TREASON

 

H F-SP 23

 

 

 

 

 

 

[AN ANALYSIS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

 

No1]

 *

 

Why EU Regional policy will destroy the Nation State

 

*

 

The Breakdown of Europe -by Richard Body - PART 1

 

This extract from a number of articles in the publication

Handshakes not Handcuffs

 

Edited by Lionel Bell

 

[2002]

June Press

www.junepress.com

 

Price £6.99

 

Sir Richard Body was a Conservative Member of Parliament from 1955 to 2001. He is Chairman of the Trustees of the Centre for European Studies and a member of the Editorial Board of New European. He has published a number of books on agricultural policy.

 

*          *

 

 

The ultimate danger now facing the European Union is that of disintegration. It is a process that for decades has been producing more and more states in the world because ordinary people wish to govern themselves and it would be surprising if it did not spread to Europe. Ordinary Europeans have never shared the enthusiasm of their leaders for political union.

 

At the same time as globalisation is tending to homogenize the world there is at work a counter-tendency for cultural diversity to find political expression in devolution. We have seen how centralisation can give rise to centrifugal forces and these are sometimes very violent. They, rather than nation-states, have accounted for most wars since 1945.

 

Markets on the global scale have disbenefits as well as benefits but it is not the case that only large political units are capable of dealing with them. This is a view from the past, when states protected their own economies by tariffs and other barriers, but nowadays-political borders are economically less important.

 

It is generally recognised that governmental interference in trade beyond a modest level is likely to do more harm than good. When it comes to dealing with powerful transnational corporations a multiplicity of small countries can do better in defending their interests than one super-state that needs to be lobbied in only one place.

 

The larger the state the more do minorities become impotent and mass majorities are swayed by emotion. Government becomes remote and individuals alienated as decisions are made to forward the interests of an undifferentiated mass. When countries are not allowed to be diverse their peoples will lose their sense of participation in their self-government.

 

Europe out of control

 

The love of power has frequently been the motive for bringing Europe under a single rule. The reason there is a democratic deficit in Europe is that the powers of countries have been taken from them to the European Union whose centralised authorities are not subject to democratical control. Governments sit together in secret to produce legislation in ever –widening areas and making more use of the European Parliament will do nothing to improve accountability and reduce the deficit.

 

An MEP cannot be sensitive to the needs of 500,000 constituents and any one of them will have little say in electing him. In earlier days there was at least a common patriotic concern for the good of the country but such feelings are today downplayed by federalists. The result is that they are replaced by a narrow, selfish interest, but in the end this will not satisfy people and their emotional longings could break Europe apart.

 

There is already great popular hostility at the sheer inefficiency of EU policies, for example in agriculture and fisheries. The direct cost of large- scale bureaucracy, which grows exponently as the state grows and thus takes a growing proportion of resources to sustain it, must become a source of conflict.  At the same time disparities between and within countries that are all part of a single unit can lead to feelings of envy and even hate. If this is the problem now it will be much worse with enlargement.

 

There are already signs of strain within the larger member states of the EU with regional self-assertion. European Union attempts to take advantage of this by a regional policy that will diminish nation states for the benefit of the Union, and regions simply will not meet people’s needs unless the Union’s own authority is dramatically limited.

 

Most people do not show any enthusiasm for the ‘European ideal’ despite the fortune that has been spent on propaganda. They were originally led to believe that they would be richer without giving up political independence; it was a false prospectus and if we find ourselves in economic decline, as we might well do, there will be powerful demands for autonomy.

 

End of PART 1

Click Here for PART 2

JULY-2014

 

H F 169

 

 

 

 

 

[WE COMMEND THE WRITER OF THE ABOVE ARTICLE FOR REVEALING THE TRUE NATURE OF ISLAM WHICH HAS BEEN HIDDEN BEHIND THE CONTINUOUS VIOLENCE OF MANY OF ITS FUNDAMENTALIST CONVERTS. THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION HAS ITSELF  BEEN USED THROUGHOUT ITS HISTORY BY EVIL PEOPLE AND INSTITUTIONS UP TO THE PRESENT DAY BUT THE FAITH OF CHRIST CANNOT DIE.]

 

*

We found the following quote quite revealing:-

 

'Religion is not a dogma, not an emotion, but a service.- Our redemption is not of the head alone, nor of the heart alone, but pre-eminently of the life, as the only infallible criterion of what we really are.- Not belief, not emotion, but obedience is the test.- Mere belief would make religion a mere theology.- Mere emotion would make it a mere excitement.- While the true divine of it is a life, begotten of grace in the depths of the human soul, subduing to Christ all the powers of the heart and life, and incarnating itself in patient, steady, sturdy service.- doing the will of God.'

- R. D. Hitchcock. (1827-1887) Am clergy.

*

WHY+ARE+THE+MANY+MUSLIMS+SO+VIOLENT+IN+PROTECTING+

AND+SPREADING+THEIR+FAITH?

 

 

 

[Our interpretation of the above events apart from what is shown in the article below is that the MILITANT fundamentalist Islamic believers feel that this is the most effective and quicker way to bring into being an ISLAMIC STATE throughout the MIDDLE EAST and eventually throughout the world particularly ENGLAND with LONDON and the USA with NEW YORK which has accepted the close financial and energy links with the Islamic Gulf States since after the FIRST WORLD WAR  a 100 years ago.]

 

 

 
 

WITH BOTH RELIGIONS AT TIMES AT WAR WITH ONE ANOTHER SINCE THEIR INCEPTION THE GOOD ON BOTH SIDES MUST NOW UNITE WITH TRUTH AND NOT CONTINUE TO BE  USED BY THE CENTURIES LONG ILLUMINATI AND THEIR MODERN COHORTS.

*

WHAT+IS+THE+DIFFERENCE

BETWEEN+THE+RELIGIONS

OF+ISLAM+AND+CHRISTIANITY_

THE+FORMER+WORSHIP+GOD

THE+LATTER+LOOK+TO+JESUS+CHRIST

FOR+FORGIVENESS

 AUGUST-2014

H F-SP 9

 

 

 

 

DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT -July 5-2014

This paper applauds the 100 imams from every branch of
ISLAM,

who have written to UK Muslims urging them to stay away from Syria and Iraq, where more than

600

 BRITONS

are said to be fighting

In a religion LACKING A FIGUREHEAD-A POPE, ARCHBISHOP or CHIEF RABBI-

the voice of the moderate majority is far too seldom heard

Let this be the start of a concerted and sustained campaign by preachers to remind the young of their religious duty to

PEACE.

*

[On   August 22-2014 we have seen no evidence that those of the Islamic faith are on the streets protesting against ISIS and their brutality.]

H F-SP2/ 10

 

 

 

 

 

A WARNING FROM

2008

THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T UNDERSTAND MUSLIM EXTREMISM WHEN CHRISTIAN TEACHING BECOMES A CRIME

 BY

MELANIE PHILLIPS

 

H F-SP2- 11

 

 
DAILY MAIL

The-coming-apocalypse-Last-week-historian-DOMINIC-SANDBROOK-wrote-damning-critique-West-s-failure-halt-Islamic-fanatics-Now-savage-murder-confirmed-worst-fears-looks-future.

AUGUST 23-2014

H F S 2- 12

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

AUGUST 15 -2014

H F 180

 

 

 

Debacle of a “Great Game”: The Islamic State (IS) and America’s War on Iraq and Syria

 
 
 
ISIS controlled regions of Syria and Iraq

Introductory Note

This essay puts the present focus on the crisis in Iraq caused by the ISIS insurgency in the context of the historical and contemporary forces that have shaped and are still shaping the conflict in Iraq and the MENA (Middle East and North Africa).

It falls in line with a policy overseen by the United States which is predicated on the re-drawing of the Middle Eastern map i.e. balkanization and of ‘managing’ a series of manufactured conflicts which are ultimately designed to protect America’s access to the natural resources of the region.

This overarching policy accommodates a confluence of interests that cater to the hegemonic aspirations of the state of Israel, Saudi Arabia & the Sunni Gulf States and Turkey. It pits the United States and these allies against the Shia Crescent led by Iran whose allies are Syria and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Two key points contended here are:

1.The present crisis derives from the decision to overthrow the regime of Saddam Hussein on a false premise and that the overriding motivation of the influential neo-conservative group within the Bush administration was to destroy Iraq to benefit the state of Israel.

2.The present crisis is an extension of the war against the Syrian government of Bashar Assad which was manufactured by outside powers for the following ends:

  • To destroy a government with an anti-Israel stance.
  • To replace the minority Alawite government of Assad with a Sunni one which would comply with Saudi, Qatari and Turkish plans to build a natural gas pipeline from the Gulf to Turkey which would supply Europe with natural gas.
  • Destroying Alawite power in Syria would weaken Iran (and break its link with Hezbollah in Lebanon); the Iranians being the current existential threat to the Israeli state that Saddam and Nasser once were. The Shi’ite Iranians are the chief competitors of the Sunni Saudis for influence in the Middle East and of course the Iranians do not follow the dictates of Washington.

Evidence is provided of Israel’s historical and continuing motivation to break up Arab states and to stimulate turmoil via the policies of David Ben-Gurion and successive Israeli leaders as well as by reference to policy papers such as the ‘Yinon Plan’(1982) and the ‘Clean Break Document (1996).

Evidence is provided of the United States motive in fomenting sectarian conflicts and supporting extreme Islamic group as has occurred in Libya, Syria and Iraq. It is based on maintaining American economic and military hegemony and is outlined in a policy paper funded by the US Army and produced by the RAND Corporation entitled ‘Unfolding the Future of the Long War: Motivations, Prospects and Implications for the U.S. Army’ (2008).

*    *    *

The declaration on 29thJune, the first day of the holy month of Ramadan, of an Islamic Caliphate by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of al-Dawlah Al-Islamiyah fi al-Iraq wa-al-Sham –the jihadist organisation known also as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) – marks a watershed of sorts since the commencement of what used to be commonly termed as the ‘Clash of Civilizations’.

For in the post-Cold War era, even before the ‘catalyzing event’ that was September the 11th of 2001, the avowed goal of the Osama Bin Laden-led al-Qaeda movement was to create a Sunni-led Caliphate.

It has been the dream not only of the Islamic zealot but also, perhaps, the latent hope of many ordinary Muslims to have a unity of Mohammedans in a political state on a scale at least equalling those which existed in succeeding epochs during what may be referred to as the golden age of Islamic civilization.

At the helm of such an entity would be a caliph who would command a global empire of the Ummah or believers stretching from the western part of North Africa and even the Iberian Peninsula through the Middle East and south Asia and on to the Indonesian archipelago.

To many Jihadists, the re-creation of the borders of previous Caliphates such as those presided over by the Rashiduns, Umayyads, Abbasids, Fatimids and Ottomans would be an unambitious delimitation of what they feel should ideally cover all areas of the globe.

The ever changing name of the organisation first known the Islamic State in Iraq then as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria or the Levant and as of August 2014 simply the Islamic State has seemingly reflected its geographic aspirations and its latest perhaps reflective of its resolve to escape the limitation to identifiable, colonially national imposed borders.

Certainly, the historical record of the Caliphate is redolent of an irresistible need to expand as far as possible by means of conquest. It was, for instance, the goal of the Sokoto Caliphate located in modern Nigeria and extending to a vast range of West Africa to expand the frontiers of Islam further south in order, the euphemism went, for its warriors to ‘dip’ the Holy Koran into the waters of the Atlantic Ocean.

The June rampage of ISIS in a murderous Blitzkrieg starting from the eastern borders of strife-ridden Syria through the northern part of Iraq caught the attention of the world. Amid stories of Iraqi army commanders apparently deserting their posts, cities such as Tikrit, Fallujah and Mosul fell.

These startling events along with evidence of wanton violence perpetrated against civilian populations saw media outlets reflect the American government’s projection of the insurgents as an extreme species of Islamic fanaticism surpassing even that of al-Qaeda which had to be stopped at all costs.

Such ‘cost’, it was claimed, would even countenance an alliance of sorts with the Iranian state, the arch-enemy consigned to the infamous status of an ‘Axis of Evil’ nation and presently subjected to the most punitive measures of economic sanctions mounted against any nation-state in recent years.

The crisis of ISIS is, of course, not an isolated, self-incubated phenomenon but rather is the latest installment in a chain of events that goes back to the decision of the United States to invade Iraq in 2003 in order to effect the removal of the regime headed by Saddam Hussein.

It is also an episode which on closer examination may bear the hallmarks of precise direction and manipulation by foreign powers. It appeared deeply suspicious to some who noted the speed by which the Iraqi army’s resistance to ISIS penetration crumbled.

How could an army with vastly superior numbers and equipment be overrun so quickly? Why did the commanders in Mosul and Tikrit reportedly desert their posts and instruct soldiers to leave?

The implication is that they may have been bribed to do so. Of this proposition, no concrete evidence has materialised, although the alternative proposition, that a lack of professionalism and cohesion within a dysfunctional army that is the product of a dysfunctional state suddenly confronted by hordes of battle-hardened and ideologically motivated fanatics is a compelling one.

Many Shia soldiers are reportedly unwilling to fight for the Iraqi state.

Still, there are some analysts who believe that it is a situation which has been manufactured with the specific aim of applying pressure on the Iraqi government led by Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and that it has a medium-term endeavour of reversing the fast dissipating fortunes of the intervention which deliberately fomented a war within the borders of Syria which itself is part of a longer-term objective of redrawing the borders of the Middle East.

The instability that has in recent times befallen Iraq and Syria and which at any time could conceivably combust into a full-blown regional war represents a confluence of interests; a merger in fact of the imperial designs of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Israel.

It is a state of affairs underpinned by the active collaboration of the United States but finds resistance from counter-measures employed by the Islamic Republic of Iran which seeks to preserve the ‘Shia Crescent’ which extends from the Persian Gulf to the eastern Mediterranean.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which serves as the custodian of the sacred relics of Islam is concerned with asserting Sunni hegemony throughout the region while the Zionist state of Israel has consistently fostered an agenda of balkanisation as a guarantee of its survival.

The motivations of Turkey under the ‘soft-Islamist’ government of Prime Minister Recep Erdogan, ostensibly, are less clear-cut given Turkey’s longstanding ‘Zero Problems with Neighbours’ policy. Not least are the implications of what a large-scale amendment to the borders of the region could have on Kurdish nationalist aspirations.

Nonetheless, if the frequently bandied descriptions of Turkish neo-Ottoman pretensions sound banal and analytically lazy, the projection of Turkish influence in the region is clearly at the heart of Erdogan’s recalibrations in his relations with both Syria and Iraq.

The United States for its part has largely been concerned with overthrowing regimes which do not toe the line; those of Saddam Hussein and Libya’s Muamar Gaddafi being the prime examples along with the attempt to unseat Bashar Assad in Syria.

While a general impression of disengagement from the region is being given by the policies of the Obama administration which has overseen the withdrawal of combat forces from Iraq and Afghanistan, the overall direction and underpinning rationale of United States policy is to continue the decades-long intrigues which have been geared towards weakening the power of Iran; and if possible, to effect the overthrow of the Islamic system of government which has been in place since the abdication of the US-backed Shah in 1979.

Notwithstanding the rapprochement of sorts which has followed the change of leadership and that is primarily evidenced by the continuing talks over its nuclear developing capacity, the sanctions against that country remain as draconian as ever.

Further, the recent announcement by the Obama administration of plans to go to Congress to raise monies for the anti-Assad opposition, confirm the on-going stratagem of attempting to permanently cut off the supply routes from Iran to Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The demarcation between ‘friendly’ and ‘hostile’ nations in the Middle Eastern and North African world is long established regardless of administration, although the most overt expression given to a long term plan remains the document formulated by the neo-Conservative Project for the New American Century (PNAC) in the 1990s.

This called for the systematic overthrow of a select number of regimes adjudged to be hostile to the “interests and values” of the United States.

The removal of Saddam Hussein in Iraq formed the initial phase and this was to be followed by countries including Sudan, Libya and Syria, with Iran serving as the finale.

While the neo-Conservative influence on the administration of George W. Bush favoured intervention using the direct resources of the United States military, the present administration favours the path of effecting destabilisation through a technique of supporting a cast of dissidents involved in the prosecution of asymmetric warfare.

These belligerents ironically have tended to consist of Sunni extremists cut out of the same cloth as al-Qaeda; of which ISIS is.

Is ISIS the latest actor on a stage involving militarized Islamist groups who have done the bidding of the United States; effectively functioning as what has been cynically termed a foreign legion of America?

There is evidence pointing to the answer being firmly in the affirmative.

As is well documented, the United States through its Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) supported the Mujahedin during its guerrilla campaign against the forces of the Soviet Union when they occupied Afghanistan.

Prior to this, the United States had developed a complex but enduring relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood which dated back to the 1950s during the Eisenhower-era. The aim was largely to influence the brotherhood in the context of containing the spread of communism.

Among the band of kindred Islamists waging the anti-Soviet insurgency with huge inputs of United States funding and training was Osama Bin Laden who of course later formed al-Qaeda.

The protestations by official CIA historians that aid was only directed at indigenous Afghan insurgents is reminiscent of the disingenuous distinction postulated in the present Syrian crisis between so-called ‘moderate’ and ‘extremist’ elements of the militias opposing Bashar Assad.

In any case, both native Afghan and foreign fighters shared the same Islamist sentiments. While they were fighting for nationalistic reasons as well as for Islamic aims which were to remove the foreign and ‘atheist’ invader from Afghan soil, they were also unknowingly fighting to fulfil an American foreign policy agenda; namely that of weakening the Cold War-era Soviet foe.

The attack of September 11th 2001 to which responsibility was affixed on Bin Laden’s group has not precluded a resumption of similar mutually beneficial relationships.

A “re-configuration” of American foreign policy priorities according to the Pulitzer award winning writer Seymour Hirsch occurred about five years later during the second tenure of the administration of President George W. Bush. This involved aiding pro-Saudi Sunni militants in the Lebanon against the Iranian supported Shia militia group, Hezbollah.

With the dawning of the so-called ‘Arab Spring’, protests against the regime of Muamar Gaddafi transmogrified into a full blown insurrection in the city of Benghazi from where militant Islamists including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group emerged to fight pitched battles against Gaddafi’s forces until he was overthrown.

This would not have been possible but for the use of NATO’s airpower as well as the logistical and instructional help such as that provided by the special forces of the United Kingdom.

The United States aided by its NATO allies were again involved in fomenting a military opposition against Bashar Assad’s government in Syria. And as confirmed in June of 2013 by the former foreign minister of France, Roland Dumas, this intervention was conceived and prepared for at least two years in advance of the commencement of the insurgency which developed a few months after what appeared to be genuine protests occurred in cities such as Damascus and Aleppo.

The rebels were given staging posts in the US-allied surrounding nations of Turkey and Jordan to serve as training quarters and to mount raids.

And as reported by both the UK Daily Telegraph and the New York Times in March of last year, a large cache of arms and equipment was airlifted to the rebels in a transaction co-ordinated by the CIA and paid for by the Saudis.

But who are the Syrian rebels and what ideological underpinnings do they have?

During the early period of the uprising, much reference was made to an organisation with the designation of ‘Free Syrian Army’. The background to this ‘body’ suggested that it had a unified command structure with a solid amount of numbers which would continue to grow as it would absorb an envisaged amount of defections from the army of Assad.

The germ of the FSA was created by a Syrian army colonel defector who, along with a number of commanders and foot soldiers, was based at Apaydin Camp in Turkey.

Despite headlined press reports of assassinations and defections of several high-level military officers, this scenario failed to materialise. Indeed, a compelling argument was made with little or no disputation that the Free Syrian Army did not exist and has never come into existence.

Instead, the name was used in reference to a range of anti-government militias fighting in different regions of Syria. Most appear to have a Salafist agenda and cannot be objectively described as being ‘secular’ or ‘moderate’. Prominent among them are the Islamic movement of Ahara Al-Sham, Jaysh al-Islam, Suqour al-Sham Brigade, Liwa al-Twhid and Liwa al-Yarmouk.

Indeed, a report by the Times of Israel in June of 2014 quotes the Israeli Defence Force’s head of Military Intelligence Research and Analysis Division as estimating that over eighty percent of the opposition fighters “have a clear Islamist agenda”.

After the initial barrage of reports on the FSA, the genuinely powerhouse opponents to Assad’s regime began to be acknowledged in the Western press. These militias composed largely of foreigners included the Jabhat al-Nusra Front and ISIS; both well-funded and more effective than the local ones.

It is hard not to conclude that weapons earmarked for rebels under the auspices of the CIA and Saudis would get into the hands of the Islamist groups, along with the benefits of the training they have received.

It is a scenario which was painted by Michael J. Morell, a former deputy CIA director who in a CBS interview stated that the battlefield effectiveness of the Islamist factions drew the so-called moderates to their camps. In his words:

Because they’re so good at fighting the Syrians, some of the moderate members of the opposition joined forces with them.

A proxy war of the sort fought in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union has been apparent for some time, and the United States is at the heart of it. It would appear that the United States is pliant to the goal of a fragmentation of the Middle East, although, of course, such a policy has never been publicly averred to.

Nonetheless, some have referred to a map prepared by a retired army colonel of the United States War Academy and which was published in the Armed Forces Journal in June of 2006 as evidence of a US-NATO objective of reconstituting the map of the Middle East.

Among the significant alterations to the Sykes-Picot agreement which created the modern nation states of the Middle East as we know them today are an Arab Shia state, a Sunni state and a Free Kurdistan being carved out of Iraq with the Kurdish state acquiring territory from Syria, Turkey and Iran.

Balkanisation has clearly been at the heart of the policy of assuring the survival of Israel. Indeed, it was a pre-condition of the emergence of the Zionist state that the Ottoman Empire be broken up and that the succeeding power in the region of Palestine, the British, would then take the steps which would lead to the establishment of what was initially termed a Jewish homeland.

Early Israeli policy under its first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, was geared towards bolstering the power of the Christian community in the Lebanon. It involved employing cynical strategies aimed at fomenting inter-communal strife among the Christian and Muslim groups in that country and even a plan to acquire territory up to the Litani River.

Indeed, the diaries of Moshe Sharett, an Israeli premier during the 1950s record Moshe Dayan declaring that Israel needed a Christian military officer to promulgate a Christian state which would then cede Lebanon south of the Litani River to Israel.

Both Ben-Gurion and Chaim Weizmann, the early Zionist leader, had proposed this northern boundary in an early map depicting a state of Israel which was presented to the 1919 Paris Peace Conference after the First World War.

The strategy of balkanisation in the Arab and Muslim world has a simple rationale. Israel has always been wary of the emergence of any nation from these lands which is nationalist in outlook, that possess a high degree of social cohesion along with an economic and military capacity which could be directed against it.

While Gamal Nasser’s Egypt and his Pan-Arabist philosophy presented the earliest visible form of what Israel perceived to be an existential threat before destroying it in the war of 1967; Ben-Gurion’s vehement opposition to Charles de Gaulle’s decision to grant Algeria independence provided ample proof of this permanent quality of sensitivity.

After Nasser, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq emerged as the threat, and following the 2003 invasion, Iran is viewed as the pre-eminent Muslim nation which poses the greatest menace.

When in the early part of 2003 the Bush administration was preparing for the invasion of Iraq, the Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon called on the Americans to also “disarm Iran, Libya and Syria”.

This long time strategy is encapsulated within a policy document produced in 1982 by Oded Yinon, a journalist who had once been attached to Israel’s foreign ministry.

Formally titled A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties’ the ‘Yinon Plan’ is predicated on Israel achieving regional military and economic hegemony while working towards the division of its neighbours into ethnic and sectarian based mini-states.

The “far reaching opportunities” referred to in the document alluded to the range of weaknesses and stress points in the various countries on its borders and further afield which could be exploited by Israel so as to ensure their weakening and eventual fracture. These included religious, ethnic and sectarian rivalries as well as economic grievances among the population.

Iraq was a priority with the desired outcome being a three-state division into Kurdish, Sunni and Shite states. Egypt would in the best scenario be split into “geographically distinct regions” encompassing a Coptic Christian state and a range of other Muslim states while Syria was identified as been essentially vulnerable because it “is fundamentally no different from Lebanon except in the strong military regime which rules it”.

For Yinon, Lebanon formed the template for the fracture of Arab states and as the paper continued:

Syria will fall apart in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbour and the Druzes will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan.

Such a state of affairs Yinon was convinced would serve as “the guarantee for peace and stability in the area in the long run”.

While Yinon’s work has often been quoted in recent years in relation to the contemporary wars in the region, it is not the only document of record offering an authentic account of such a strategy being at the heart of Israeli strategic policy.

For instance, Livia Rokach’s Israel’s Sacred Terrorism published in 1980 relates Moshe Sharett’s diary recollections of the machinations of both David Ben-Gurion and Moshe Dayan during the 1950s in regard to a range of tactics and policies designed to acquire territory as well as to sow the seeds of discord within Arab nations.

An updated version of this formula forms the explicit rationale underlying what is known as the ‘Clean Break Document’.

In 1996, A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm was produced during the first premiership of Benjamin Netanyahu by the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, an Israeli political think tank.

Led by Richard Perle, a key contributor to the aforementioned Project for the New American Century, the document put forward the argument that Israel should renounce all intentions towards achieving a comprehensive peace settlement with Arab nations and instead should work together with Turkey and Jordan to “contain, destabilize and roll-back” those states which pose as threats to all three.

And as with the PNAC document, Syria features as a state in regard to which Israeli policy should be geared towards “weakening, controlling and even rolling back”.

The means by which such destabilisation and containment would occur were not always explicitly addressed in the paper, but in practical terms it is clear that these goals are effected through a panoply of methods including Israel’s use of direct military action, its support for actors in proxy wars, and its use of the military resources of the United States through the huge influence wielded in that country by the Israel-Jewish lobby.

There is of course sensitivity attached to the terminology used in this regard and a debate in regards to the true scope of power American Jewish groups possess in terms of influencing United States foreign policy.

Yet the war declared on Saddam’s Iraq, the effects of which have led to the present crisis involving ISIS and the threat of a permanent dismemberment, was influenced by the likes of the aforementioned Richard Perle, as well as Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith.

All are designated as neo-conservative in political outlook and were signatories to a letter written by members of PNAC to the incumbent President Bill Clinton calling for the military overthrow of the government of Saddam Hussein.

The Israeli state lies at the heart of any serious analysis of the reasons why America declared war on Saddam’s Iraq as well as the later war manufactured by external powers in Syria.

In the year before the US attack on Iraq, the Guardian newspaper quoted the retired US Four-Star General Wesley Clark as saying that the so-called ‘hawks’ within the Bush administration who were lobbying for the war had been doing so well before the events of September 11th 2001 and privately acknowledged that the regime of Saddam Hussein did not pose a threat to America.

“But”, said Clark, “they are afraid at some point he might decide if he had a nuclear weapon to use it against Israel.”

Carl Bernstein, the veteran journalist and himself Jewish when referring to what he termed the “insane war” in Iraq, asserted in 2013 that it had been started by what he described as “Jewish neo-cons who wanted to remake the world (for Israel)”.

The ‘reconfiguration’ of American policy as alluded to by Seymour Hersh has at its heart the state of Israel. According to Hersh:

The Saudi government, with Washington’s approval, would provide funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashar Assad of Syria. The Israelis believe that putting such pressure on the Assad government will make it more conciliatory and open to negotiations.

In a continuation of his revelation of the preconception of the anti-Assad revolt, Roland Dumas provided the following:

In the region (i.e. the Middle East) it is important to know that this Syrian regime has a very anti-Israeli stance…and I have this from the former Israeli prime minister who told me “we’ll try to get on with our neighbours, but those who don’t agree with us will be destroyed”.

The pretence of Israeli non-involvement in the present war in Syria or even its purported interest in maintaining the status quo with Assad remaining in power is belied by actions and pronouncements.

A report last year in Debka, a website staffed by Israeli journalists providing news on intelligence and security issues, revealed that senior IDF officers had criticised Moshe Ya’alon, the defence minister for misleading the Knesset when he gave an estimate that President Assad’s forces controlled far less territory than it actually did and as a consequence, the Israeli armed forces were acting on the basis of inaccurate intelligence.

“Erroneous assessments…must lead to faulty decision-making” the report concluded.

An explicit statement from a government insider concerning Israel’s attitude toward the Assad government came from Michael Oren last September. He said the following to the Jerusalem Post when leaving his post as Israeli ambassador to the United States:

The greatest danger to Israel is by the strategic arc that extends from Tehran to Damascus to Beirut. And we saw the Assad regime as the keystone in that arc. That is a position we had well before the outbreak of hostilities in Syria. With the outbreak of hostilities we continued to want Assad to go.

Publicly disclosed operations such as those involving the bombing of pro-Assad storage depots and convoys claimed to be part of a logistical trail leading to Hezbollah in Lebanon, while portrayed as surgical in nature were likely made with the overall desire of weakening Assad’s forces in his campaign against the insurgents.

For instance, in June of 2014, when a missile fired from Syrian territory killed an Israeli citizen on the Golan Heights, the Israeli Air Force responded by mounting sorties on nine positions belonging to the Syrian Army including a regional command centre.

This mission was undertaken, a Times of Israel report noted, despite the fact that “some Israeli (intelligence) experts said the area from which the anti-tank rocket was fired is under the control of Syrian rebels, not the Assad regime”.

The present crisis generated by the gains of ISIS in Iraq and speculation as to whether the United States should intervene on the side of the Maliki government revealed the age long thinking and strategy of Israel’s leaders and policymakers.

Speaking on NBC TV’s Meet the Press in June, Benjamin Netanyahu’s stated that “We must weaken both”. “Both” of course was referring to the Sunni and Shia divide.

When your enemies are fighting each other, don’t strengthen either of them, weaken both.

Furthermore, Netanyahu has recently called for the establishment of a Kurdish state.

But the conceptualisation of a reformatted Middle East is not solely the concern of the Americans and the Israelis. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has for long harboured ambitions to be the undisputed leader of the Arab and Muslim world, and to this end battled with the secular, pan-Arab philosophy as espoused by Gamal Abdel Nasser for the soul of the Arabs, and, in more recent times, it is contending with the Shi’ite bastion of Iran for regional influence.

Saudi Arabia along with its Gulf emirate neighbours, most notably Qatar, have been involved in the financing and organising of the revolts against the secular regimes of Colonel Gaddafi and President Assad, and the stripe of the beneficiaries such as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, the Jabhat al-Nusra Brigade and ISIS is clearly Islamist.

It is a history which goes back some time and includes providing funds to the Mujahedin in Afghanistan in the 1980s which many historians would argue provided the germ for the development of al Qaeda and now ISIS which is a more extreme offshoot of the former.

But quite apart from pinpointing the instances of the documented funding of groups such as al-Nusra and ISIS is the responsibility arguably borne by the Saudi state for the rise of Islamic extremism in modern times.

The pivotal moment in history, according to the case compellingly put by the Middle East affairs journalist Yaroslav Trofimov, was the siege of Mecca in 1979. On November the 20th, which was the first day of a new Muslim century, a large group of gunmen numbering in the hundreds seized control of Mecca’s Grand Mosque, the holiest shrine in Islam.

Led by a preacher named Juhayman al Uteybi, the insurgents declared that the Mahdi or “redeemer of Islam” had arrived in the form of one Mohammed Abdullah al-Qahtani.

The insurgents also had the objective of overthrowing the House of Saud on the grounds that they had compromised the strict tenets of the Wahhabi creed originally imposed on the country after it had been formed by Muhammad Ibn Saud.

The grievance stemmed largely from the policy of Westernization and amongst several demands, Uteybi’s insurgents called for the expulsion of Westerners, the abolition of television and the ending of education for women.

The two-week siege was ended after the Saudis obtained the blessing of Wahhabi clerics to storm the Mosque with the aid of French Special Forces and flush out the rebels.

But this came at a price. The Saudis clamped down in areas where ‘liberalisation’ had strayed such as the media and the school curriculum.

The decision was also made at the behest of the powerful fundamentalist clerics for the Saudis to pump money into the coffers of Sunni missionary organisations to spread of the ideas of the Wahhabi strain in Islamic universities and madrassas around the Muslim world. This purist brand of Islam lays particular focus on Jihadist sentiment.

The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan provided the opportunity for both the United States and Saudi Arabia to tap into the Saudis rededication to Wahhabism.

President Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, saw in the Soviet move a chance to exploit outrage in the Muslim world, and the Saudis, following a fatwa declared by Abdelaziz Bin Baz, later the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, provided funding for the local Mujahidin as well as the bands of non-Afghan Jihadis who became the template for the contemporary multi-national Jihadis operating in both Syria and Iraq.

The aforementioned airlift of arms from the Balkans at the direction of the CIA which was paid for by the Saudis follows a mutually agreeable pattern for both nations.

A key player in Saudi strategy in its power play with Iran and the manipulation of Islamist militias in both Iraq and Syria has been Prince Bander Bin Saud, until recently the chief of Saudi intelligence as well as the head of the Saudi National Security Council.

So far as funding ISIS is concerned, there are reports that Prince Abdul Rahman Faisal, a son of the late King Faisal and a graduate of Sandhurst Royal Military College, serves as the conduit through which Saudi policy is driven and that he even influences the tactics of the group.

The prince is the brother of Prince Saud al Faisal, long-time foreign minister and Prince Turki al Faisal, ambassador to the UK and the US. However, this specific allegation has yet to be officially corroborated.

One clue as to the inclinations of the Saudi state towards this marauding army of homicidal Jihadists may have been their issuing of a statement calling on the United States not to begin a bombing campaign in ISIS.

The Iraqi government has publically accused the Saudis of supporting ISIS and Prime Minister Maliki has saddled them with the responsibility for what he describes as the “crimes that may qualify as genocide: the spilling of Iraqi blood, the destruction of the Iraqi state institutions and historic religious sites”.

Aside from the sectarian-ideological motivations which lie behind the decision to attempt to unseat the Assad regime in Syria is one with a specifically economic dimension.

This relates to the decision of the Assad government to reject a proposed pipeline project through which natural gas would be pumped from Qatar to Turkey via Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria.

The reason Assad is said to have turned down the plan is that such a pipeline, which by extension would be able to supply European markets, would undermine the interests of Syria’s ally Russia which is the premier supplier of natural gas to Europe.

Instead, he pursued an alternative pipeline project which would emanate from Iran and run to Syria via Iraq.

This would explain the volte force on the part of the purportedly neutral Turk’s after initially cultivating cordial relations with Assad. Turkey cherishes the idea of serving as what has been described as the “ultimate energy bridge between east and west.”

It also explains Turkey’s use of a crucial natural resource as a weapon of specific retaliation and one that it will continue to use as a source of leverage in his dealings with Assad in Syria and the Iraqi government of Maliki: water.

This increasingly globally scarce resource in regard to which the Turks sit on one of the world’s largest reserves has of course formed a very underplayed yet significant backdrop to a number of conflicts including the seizure of the West Bank by Israel in 1967 and the overthrown of Gaddafi in 2011.

In May of 2014, the Turkish government cut off the water supply to the River Euphrates having started a process of a gradual reduction in the pumping of the river. It has led to a drastic shrinkage in the water levels of the man-made Lake Assad and is causing hardship to communities.

The rationale for the United States overseeing a sectarian based war in Syria and Iraq also has a basis in terms of accessing the natural resources of the Middle East on which the West remains reliant for its energy needs.

The need to foment such conflict; what in fact was described as a “long war” was bluntly put in a United States Army funded report by the RAND Corporation in 2008.

Entitled, Unfolding the Future of the Long War: Motivations, Prospects and Implications for the U.S. Army, the paper crucially identifies the geographic area of proven oil reserves as coinciding with what it terms as “the powerbase of the Salafi-Jihadist network”.

“This”, it continues, “creates a linkage between oil supplies and the long war that is not easily broken or simply characterized”.

The following more detailed excerpt explains how sectarian fault lines can be exploited in order to serve the interests of the West:

Divide and Rule focuses on exploiting fault lines between the various Salafi-jihadist groups to turn them against each other and dissipate their energy on internal conflicts. This strategy relies heavily on covert action, information operations (IO), unconventional warfare and support to indigenous security forces…the United States and its local allies could use the nationalist jihadists to launch proxy IO campaigns to discredit the transnational jihadists in the eyes of the local populace…US leaders could also choose to capitalize on the ‘Sustained Shia-Sunni Conflict’ trajectory by taking the side of the conservative Sunni regimes against Shi’ite empowerment movements in against the Muslim world…possibly supporting authoritative Sunni governments against a continuingly hostile Iran.

The report is clear about the need for the United States to simultaneously shore up the regimes which it classifies as ‘friendly’ to its interests such as Egypt, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia while working to weaken the influence of Iran; a strategy which it admits could serve to strengthen Jihadi groups, but which at the same time would bog them down in sectarian conflicts that would divert their energies from targeting the West:

One of the oddities of this long war trajectory is that it may actually reduce the al-Qaeda threat to US interests in the short term. The upsurge in Shia identity and confidence seen here would certainly cause serious concern in the Salafi-jihadist community in the Muslim world, including the senior leadership of al-Qaeda. As a result, it is very likely that al-Qaeda might focus its efforts on targeting Iranian interests throughout the Middle East and Persian Gulf while simultaneously cutting back on anti-American and anti-Western operations.

The document is certainly prescient so far as developments in terms of the Syrian uprising and the tumult in Iraq are concerned.

At the same time, it is worth noting that the fomenting of sectarian antagonism in order to fulfil an objective for the United States is not new to the region; a specific example being the use made of Shi’ite death squads made up of personnel recruited from militias such as the Badhr Organisation and the Mahdi Army to nullify a Sunni-led insurgency which had been claiming the lives of a great many American soldiers.

Thus the bolstering of Islamist groups such as the al-Nusra Brigade and later ISIS in a series of pre-conceived US military intelligence operations that are pursuant to America’s long-term geo-strategic interests is not merely plausible but is actual reality.

It fits into reports during the early stages of the Syrian conflict of claims that British and French military advisers were stationed at the borders of Syria and offering Syrian rebels as well as prospective insurgents including those arriving from abroad military training.

The existence of training camps run by NATO officials and well as by former US Special Forces mercenaries who operate private security consultancies in the Gulf has been alluded to in reports via the mainstream press including the German Der Spiegel.

In March of 2013, it reported that around 200 men had received training over the previous three months in Jordan and that the Americans planned to train a total of 1,200 members of the Free Syrian Army in two camps; one in the south and the other in the eastern part of the country.

While unsure as to whether the American trainers were serving US Army personnel or were working under the auspices of private firms, the magazine did note that some organisers wore service uniforms.

A report by the British Guardian newspaper, also in March 2013, confirmed the presence of US, British and French military advisers who were giving Syrian rebels what was termed “logistical and other advice in some form”.

While the article claimed that such training was been given to elements described as being “secular” so that an effective military militia would serve as a bulwark against Islamic extremist brigades, such a claim cannot be taken at face value.

The report alluded to the presence of CIA-led training camps in deeper locations within Jordan, and just how the Western operatives can distinguish between those who on the one hand are “secular” and those who on the other are “Islamist” remains unclear.

Given what is known about US policy via the RAND report and the actions of NATO in aiding Salafists in the Libyan uprising against Colonel Gaddafi, such professed distinctions are likely disingenuous especially when the accepted view is that the overwhelming majority of Syrian and foreign insurgents view the fight against the ‘apostate’ Alawite government of Assad as a Sunni crusade.

And so far as the training of ISIS is concerned, several news outlets are disseminating claims from Jordanian officials that members of ISIS were among those insurgents who received training from Western military advisers.

Even if it was accepted that prospective insurgents were not specifically coloured by an ideological allegiance to militias bearing an overtly Islamist agenda, and they were being readied to serve in the ranks of the putative Free Syrian Army, it is quite clear that as argued above, such an entity is non-existent.

After all its purported commander, General Salim Idris, whose organisation represented the supposed counter-weight to the Al Nusra Brigade and ISIS, relocated to Qatar in February 2014, his right hand man to Sweden and the number three figure is apparently residing in the Netherlands.

It is also more likely the case that a person nominally trained as a vetted FSA candidate guerrilla would leave for one of the better funded Islamist groups who offer their fighters more remuneration thanks to the largesse of wealthy donors from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait.

All of this is done with the apparent acquiescence of the United States and is in line with the thinking behind the report conducted by the RAND Corporation.

What also falls into sync with the series of rationales behind that report is the role played by former American internees in conflicts involving Islamist insurgents.

Many of these figures, incarcerated in the context of the so-called ‘War on Terror’, did not turn to the business of perpetuating acts of terror against Western military or civilian targets but involved themselves in insurrections which happened to be mutually beneficial to the Islamist causes and the United States.

Consider for instance the case of Abu Sufian bin Qumu. Qumu was renditioned from Pakistan to Camp Guantanamo Bay sometime after the NATO conquest of Afghanistan.  He was released from US custody despite the conclusion of analysts that he represented a “medium to high risk, as he is likely to pose a threat to the US, its interests and its allies”.

He was transferred to a Libyan jail in 2007 at the time when the US and its allies were cooperating with the Gaddafi regime in a policy aimed at containing Islamists but released in 2010 under an amnesty.

However, when the insurrection against the Gaddafi regime commenced in 2011, Qumu, in the words of the New York Times article in April of that year had somewhat perversely become “a U.S. ally of sorts”.

Another Libyan figure Abdelhakim Bel Hadj, like Qumu was renditioned by the United States government and under the auspices of the British MI6 was placed in the detention regime of the security services of the Gaddafi regime.

As with Qumu, he was released under the 2010 amnesty by the Libyan government but joined the militias which with the help of NATO overthrew Gaddafi.

The head of ISIS and proclaimed caliph of the declared Islamic State, Baghdadi, was himself held in US detention between 2004 and 2009 at Camp Bucca in Iraq.

He, like the others, represents the ‘re-direction of energies’ thesis postulated in the context of the “long war” predicted by the aforementioned paper.

It might be going too far without any incontrovertible evidence to suggest that men such as Qumu, Bel Hadj and Baghdadi are double agents ‘turned’ by US intelligence during their periods of detention.

But it is worth noting that that the dark arts as practised by intelligence agencies including that of NATO military intelligence in its Cold War-era manipulations of terrorist organisations of the extreme political Left and Right in Italy are capable of refinement and readjustment.

During that period, the techniques of infiltrating the leadership positions of political terror groups and steering them toward pursuing certain course of actions, as detailed in the infamous manual produced by Yves Guerin-Serac’s Aginter Press, were successfully practised.

These Islamist figures have effectively had ‘presented’ to them a series of conflicts which have been tailor-made to assure the active participation of men of their ideological disposition.

The emergence of ISIS, barbaric acts and medieval-like edicts including the announcing of the institution of the dhimmi system notwithstanding, plays towards the prescribed US agenda in promoting its short and long-term goals.

It is also not unconnected with the turning of the tide gains made in the Syrian conflict by the forces loyal to President Assad and their foreign allies, namely Russia, as well as their co-denominational brethren from the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and the Lebanese Hezbollah.

The war against Assad has defied the expectation that his minority-led government would be toppled in a short period of time as had happened with the Gaddafi regime.

The covert strategies devised by General Qassem Suleimani, the head of the Quds Force which is often described as been analogous to a combined CIA and Special Forces, has succeeded in stabilising the a situation which for a time was looking very dire from the perspective of the Assad regime.

The shoring up of this ‘Axis of Resistance’ against America and its Middle East allies, most notably, the Sunni powers, has been critical given the high stakes suggested by these words in a speech delivered by an Iranian cleric:

If we lose Syria, we cannot keep Tehran.

The stabilization of the Syrian front has been interpreted as a defeat by the Sunni powers and the surgent ISIS in Iraq presents an opportunity for the Americans in its continuing quest to weaken Iran.

After all, bombing ISIS targets in Iraq could conceivably lead to bombing parts of Syria under the pretext that such operations are being directed at ISIS. It could provide a back door opportunity to carry out the bombing of Assad’s forces which in the wake of the chemical attack at Ghouta last August had been the intended course of action.

The motivation behind the calls by made by ‘hawks such as senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham for the United States to bomb ISIS likely matches this.

These men after all must be aware of the overwhelmingly Islamist stripe of the vast majority of rebels fighting in Syria who were the eventual beneficiaries of the monies released by the US Congress in bills which both have strenuously championed.

This support, including their calls for President Obama to bomb and weaken the military capability of the Assad government last August, is designed to create the circumstances which would lead to his overthrow and the creation of a vacuum which, as happened in Libya, can only be filled by those who would be chosen by the likes of the al-Nusra Brigade and ISIS.

Yet, the policymakers and the engineers of the covert operations enabling the continuation of this ‘Long War’ must have in their calculations the possibility, even inevitability, of what is termed ‘blowback’.

This is the suspected backdrop to the murder by Islamists of American personnel at the Benghazi ‘consulate’ which allegedly served as a conduit for the shipment of weapons to anti-Assad jihadis via Turkey.

For some time now, security officials from the Western European nations whose radicalised Muslim citizens are participants in the wars in Syria and Iraq have warned that returning jihadis would pose significant threats to peace and order.

President Obama himself admitted in June that the spread of ISIS-led conflicts to neighbouring states could pose a “medium to long-term threat” to the United States.

The sponsors of the ISIS such as Saudi Arabia could also be imperilling their long-term survival.

Like a frankensteinian creation, an independent and emboldened Islamic State with pretensions to controlling a Caliphate which does not recognise national borders would not stop at Iraq and Syria but could attempt to overthrow the Saudi regime on the basis that the Caliph is by Islamic tradition the designated Custodian of the two holiest mosques in Islam: the Al-Masjid al-Haram in Mecca and the Al-Masjid al-Nabawi in Medina.

Certainly the threat to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan appears to be the more immediate. A video posted on Youtube in April of 2014 described King Abdullah as “despotic” and a “worshipper of the English” and vowed to “slaughter” him.

While President Obama has in August of 2014 finally caved into pressure to order air strikes against ISIS positions, sight must not be lost of the greater picture; that of a ‘Great Game’ and a ‘Long War’ in which the United States is bound to continue its long-term strategy of protecting what it perceives as it national interests including maintaining its access to the natural resources of the region.

Its continuation was evident in Obama’s recent request for $500 dollars from the US Congress to train the so-called “Syrian Opposition”.  According to the Washington Post, “money for the assistance would expand a CIA covert operation’s training program”.

Developments within the context of this long-term foreign policy objective continue to present obstacles and also opportunities for the United States to exercise leverage.

So even if the recent gains of ISIS were not deliberately manufactured by Washington’s covert arm, it nonetheless provides an opportunity for the United States to put pressure on Prime Minister Maliki who the Americans view as being largely compliant to the dictates of Tehran and even to effect his removal in favour of someone who would follow the American line more willingly.

Some analysts suspect that the United States does exercise an undisclosed covert influence on ISIS; with even the suggestion that they are directed at field level by Western mercenaries or Special Forces embedded within their ranks much in the manner as members of Britain’s Special Forces were among the rebels who overthrew Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi.

And that because the Americans created the political structures presently governing Iraq including the supply of military weapons, that they are effectively controlling both actors in the crisis.

If this is the truth or at least close to the truth, it is fulfilling the template of the “long war” outlined in the RAND Corporation’s policy document. The United States will then seek to ‘manage’ this situation for as long as it can.

The ability of outsiders to effect instability of the Middle East owes much to the arbitrary border demarcations of imperial draughtsmen as represented by the Sykes-Picot agreement, the sectarian divide between Sunni and Shia, the miscellaneous tribal affiliations of its peoples along with the relative economic and environmental fortunes of its sub-regions.

Oded Yinon was being far from off-handed when pointing out in his paper that the Arab Muslim world was “astonishingly self-destructive”.

The latent fault lines cutting across the swathe of lands from North Africa to the Persian Gulf have been exploited by non-Arabs who have enabled the Arab nations to be willing accomplices in the coups, insurrections and wars which have brought havoc.

Very few can fail to see that the present crisis as being causally linked to the overthrow of the regime of Saddam Hussein by a war of aggression waged by the administration of George W. Bush which was based on a false premise.

And as General Sir Michael Rose, a retired British soldier put it earlier this year, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair is self-deluded and “remains in complete denial over the disaster he inflicted not only on the people of Iraq, but also on many millions throughout the Middle East as a result of the 2003 invasion”.

Further, despite the protestations of Richard Perle made last month about the use of the term ‘neo-cons’ as what he emotively described as a “hateful” word directed at Jewish Americans, the evidence clearly demonstrates that the invasion had at the heart of the motivation of its principal proponents the destruction of an Arab state which presented a modicum of a military threat to the regional hegemony of the state of Israel.

It is also disingenuous to deny the fragmenting of Iraq as a state, whether by peaceful or strife-ridden circumstances as been the inevitable consequence of the invasion.

Few who understand the historical foundations of the policy of the Zionist state cannot fail to appreciate the requirement that its survival has always been predicated on the weakening and balkanization of its neighbours.

Also, few who are aware of the policy agenda of the United States in promoting and ‘managing’ sectarian conflict as a means of assuring its continued access to the natural resources of the Middle East will fall into a constricted analysis of ISIS as a stand-alone phenomenon unrelated to the cynical quality which underlies American strategy in the region.

It is but merely one troublesome episode within a wider saga; that of a twenty-first century version of the “Great Game”.

Adeyinka Makinde is a Lecturer in Law with a research interest in Intelligence and Security matters. He is based in London, England.


 
 904
Articles by: Adeyinka Makinde
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca

*

[HIGHLIGHTING OF SOME TEXT IS OURS!]I

 

JEW WATCH-HISTORY OF THE ZIONISM

 

 

 

H F 215

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

JULY 21-2014

H F 180

 

DAILY MAIL

 I-fear-panic-stricken-politicians-leading-bloody-shambles-Iraq by-

GENERAL-SIR-MICHAEL-ROSE

 

General Sir Michael Rose led the UN forces in Bosnia

 

 

AUGUST 20-2014   

H F 226

 
A MATTER OF BALANCE!

Why Palestinian spokesman must ALWAYS state the FACT!

'There have been no sanctions on Israel-which has consistently defied the United Nations and which has broken more international laws than Iraq.

Israel has flouted UN Resolution 242 ( which urges Israel to withdraw from land it occupied in 1967) for over 30 years-

Vernon Coleman

-2003

H F-SP41

 

 
EXTRACT

...President Vladimir Putin stands accused of encouraging these separatists, of aiding and abetting them, and almost certainly supplying them with missile system that was used to shoot down the plane. He's a bad man, and a dangerous one, too.

BUT

in the dock of history there will be another defendant the

EUROPEAN UNION

Morally speaking, of course, it towers far above Putin and the separatists. Yet it is

GUILTY

 of precipitating

THIS CRISIS

and arguably of

CAUSING IT.

A FATAL combination of VANITY, HUBRIS and NAIVETY characterised EU POLICY towards  UKRAINE before its ELECTED PRESIDENT, VIKTOR YANUKOVYCH' was removed in a popular uprising earlier this year,

Now the same EU, which recklessly attempted to lure Ukraine out of the RUSSIAN SPHERE OF INFLUENCE, reveals itself as being FEEBLE and DIVIDED, and utterly INCAPABLE of DEALING with the ALARMING consequences of its ACTIONS.

The key to understanding this crisis is the EU's generally benign, though ill-conceived

IMPERIALISM

Its membership has expanded at an astonishing rate as new countries, some of them

VERY POOR

have been admitted in recent years.  The EU, David Cameron promised last year, will one day stretch from' the Atlantic to the Urals'.

[NOT IF PRESIDENT PUTIN REMAINS IN OFFICE-HE HAS BEEN THE OBSTACLE TO THE NAZI PLAN OF 1943 OF A GERMAN CONTROLLED SUPER STATE OF A EUROPEAN UNION FROM THE 'Atlantic to the Urals' And we notice that our 'useful idiot' in No 10 is well aware of those PLANS and still talks about major reform in the EU which is VERBOTEN! to be sure.

In the words of Lord Acton (1834-1902) a staunch Englishman and European of his day-branch of family in Germany .

' ...Great men are almost always bad men.'

 

Unfortunately for England we have in No 10 a naive PR obsessed individual who lurches from one blunder to another with his politically-correct decisions.  Give us so-called bad-guy PUTIN any day at least he is a PATRIOT and loves HIS COUNTRY. Whereas David Cameron is always on about being a FRIEND of ISRAEL (CFI) and of the SATANIC COLLECTIVIST CORRUPT COSTLY UNDEMOCRATIC EU but he is certainly NO FRIEND OF ENGLAND.

 

INDICTMENT

 

David Cameron's failed attempt to take the country to WAR in SYRIA and his PASSION for the EU can be summed up as follows.-

 

WAR

 

'That war is an evil is something that we all know, and it would be pointless to go on cataloguing all the disadvantages involved in it.  No one is forced into WAR by IGNORANCE, nor, if he thinks he will gain from it, is he kept out of it by fear.  The fact is that one side thinks that the profits to be won outweigh the risks to be incurred, and the other side is ready to face danger rather than accept an immediate loss.'

[ History,1V-THUCYDIDES-C.471-400 B.C.

 

*

 

 

PATRIOTISM

 

 

'Love of country is one of the loftiest virtues; and so treason against it has been considered among the most damning sins.'-E. A. Storrs (1835-1885).

 

*

 

http://www.russiaotherpointsofview.com/2014/04/russia-report-putin-.html

 

 

*

 

 

 

To continue

 

... But the expansionist impulses of the EU extended further to the Ukraine, which Russia regards as being in a different category to the other Eastern or Central European post-Soviet states which had joined the European Union as well as Nato, the western military alliance.

Ukraine has a large Russian speaking population, and was the cradle of Mother Russia. Until 1991, it and Russia were

PART OF THE SAME COUNTRY

The

SOVIET UNION.

ANY ATTEMPT TO TO ABSORB UKRAINE INTO THE EU WAS BOUND TO BE FRAUGHT WITH GREAT DANGERS EVEN IF UNDERTAKEN WITH ENORMOUS DIPLOMATIC SKILL.

 

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CHANGES OF FONT AND HIGHLIGHTING AND LINKS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

 
 
 

H F-SP2-2-

 

 

 

 

H F 182

 
Read more:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/britains-israel-lobby-the-conservative-friends-of-israel-cfi-pressures-hms-goverment-is-david-cameron-complicit-in-war-crimes/5395000

H F SP2-1

 

 

 
Catholic Graves of 350,800 Missing Children Found by JUDY BYINGTON

H F-SP- 12

 
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 19-2014

H F 177

 

 
Jesuit Head Resigns, Charged with Child Sacrifice by JUDY BYINGTON

H F-SP 13

WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.

Christopher Story of International Currency Review

www.worldreports.org

 

THE IDEA OF A SINISTER GLOBAL ELITE CONTROLLING EVENTS HAS LONG BEEN THE STUFF OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES-[AND WITH MUCH JUSTIFICATION].

*

DEATH OF PATRIOTISM

by

Leo McKinstry

 

THE NAZI INTERNATIONAL  PLAN IS BROUGHT INTO THE OPEN.

No 3

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

www.worldreports.org

 

DO YOU KNOW?

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH

WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON

67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU

THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

How many people work for the European Union?

The ANSWER is NOT as stated in the EU pamphlet and blazed about by the Government minister Denis MacShane and the Independent

which SHOULD KNOW BETTER.]

 
Hurrah for Libertas!

 

eurofacts:-5th September,2008

DAVID OWEN

DEVON

*

 

[Unfortunately when it came to the election Mr Ganley reverted to PRO-EU stance and his party disappeared  without trace.]

eurofacts

No:89

5th September, 2008

Review by Ian Milne

of 'The Triumph of the Political Class'

by

Peter Oborne.

 
DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

www.worldreports.org

WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN

I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY

WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY?

LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE

ESTABLISHED

IN MADRID IN 1943

By

HEINRICH HIMMLER

 

 

PETITIONS TO NO10

DEMANDING A REFERENDUM ON EU

It is time the EUROSCEPTIC factions created a WAR COMMITTEE united under one LEADER.

As we have stated on many occasions in the past the Eurosceptic organisations are without a War Committee led by a General such as Sir Michael Rose -ex SAS command who would be the pivot point of the entire Eurosceptic opinion in the country.

 
POLITICAL COURAGE IS NOT AMONG THE QUEEN'S MANY VIRTUES.

PART of EXTRACT

from

WHO KILLED BRITAIN

by

A. N. Wilson

*

LATEST!

 ON

SACRED OATH

SLY OLD FOX-ARCHITECT OF EU CONSTITUTION - SUGGESTS SPECIAL TERMS FOR BRITAIN.

'I fear the Frenchman even  though he offer gifts'.

THEY never give up.  THEY they can't afford to because without Britain the cost to the German engine driver and French fireman of the EU Collective Express would topple the EU.

 

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL

THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH

OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION

THE GANG OF THREE-THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

THE END OF TRUTH - HOW WE CAME TO LOSE OUR CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY 

THE EXECUTIVE IS TOO STRONG-THE LEGISLATURE TOO WEAK.

*

The views of the majority of the people of our country are ignored

 

Why our English Self-Government is unique in Europe and the World.

As one of many who attended the Collegiate Church of Saint Mary in Warwick for the Funeral Service of The Rt. Hon. J. Enoch Powell (1912-1998) it was a great honour to be present with many to hear of the life of one of our nations great Patriots.

 
THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?

*

Gordon Brown states before a packed Parliament that it has now signed six

EU TREATIES

so

A REFERENDUM is NOT NECESSARY

WELL! -HE IS WRONG! 

SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE

BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY

A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING

NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

THE WAY WE ARE?

Over our long history we have rarely made a mistake of colossal magnitude such as our foreign affairs with the American colonies in the 18th century and the question of Ireland which is still not completely settled after over 400 years.

BUT IN JUNE 2008 THE ENGLISH PEOPLE WERE BETRAYED BY QUEEN-COMMONS and LORDS.

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE AS 'THE NEW EUROPEAN SOVIET

Christopher Story of International Currency Review

wwww.worldreports.org

 

The CORONATION OATH ACT of 1688

declares

OATH TAKEN for the PURPOSE of MAINTAINING our SPIRITUAL and CIVIL RIGHTS.

Can the QUEEN veto the New EU Treaty?

'YES!'

The Queen is obliged to sign a Bill but it is  not a law of the land-It is merely a CONVENTION. SHE should have WARNED HER MINISTERS to give the PEOPLE a REFERENDUM or SHE would DECLINE TO SIGN away HER SUBJECTS  'Rights and Liberties', as accustomed

But SHE was NOT a TRUE QUEEN OF ENGLAND

AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED

HOW a  supposed FREE PRESS failed to FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOM.

But are they finally gradually moving towards greater disclosure of the iniquities of the

 EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE?

OUR VERDICT IS THEY HAVE AS YET ONLY PUT THE TIP OF THEIR TOE INTO THE REVOLTING CREATURE.

BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE

50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER

ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]BULLETIN FILE

H F 4

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 
The Paranoid Jew by DR. ELIAS AKLEH

H F-SP 14

 

 

 
why-arent-ISIS

and-

ALQAEDA

attacking ISRAEL?

 

H F-SP2-6

 

A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

JEWSNOT ZIONISTST DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

NADER LIBRARY.COM-

TERRORISM-ILLUMINATI

 

 

 

 

NEILKEENAN.COM

 

 

 

WHISTLEBLOWER.

ORG

 

 

DIVINECOSMOS.COM GLOBALRESEARCH.CA/CO
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG.

H F 189

JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 
 
 

Weekly Geopolitical News and Analysis 20140630 Is ISIS a CRISIS or some kind of inside joke

Is ISIS a CRISIS or some kind of inside joke?

Sometimes events in the news seem so surreal that it becomes a guess they are not real, or at least not in the sense we see it. That is certainly the case with the declaration of the Islamic Caliphate or ISIS last week.

The first thing to note, as pointed out by alert readers, is that there is a military contractor called ISIS that offers services in such areas as “role playing,” “exercise and evaluations,” “human intelligence,” “special operations” and “unmanned aircraft systems” among other things.

https://public.isishq.com/public/capabilities/default.aspx

Most of their offices are either in the Middle East or the United States and it is a pretty good guess they got the contract to carry out operation ISIS in the Middle East.

When you see news article full of demands by ISIS to “hand over your daughters for sex,” or crucifixions of Christians and threats that the “black flag of Jihad will fly over London”

http://rt.com/uk/166128-isis-jihadists-threaten-britain/

it is a pretty good guess you are dealing with a major psy-ops or role playing game.
Here is what and MI5 source had to say about it:

“This is a PR exercise to bring terrorism into a branded, packaged presence which is the normal purview of corporate marketing and PR. We are witnessing a global psy-op to shift the perception of “terror” groups away from being rogue psycho’s to being more like football teams playing for victory in sanitized arenas.”

As mentioned before, there has been an agreement between various secret power groups for the establishment of an Islamic Caliphate to replace the artificial borders created by the French and the British in the Middle East after World War I. That is what is happening now.

This is linked to the sudden influx of illegal immigrants pouring into the US. There has been a secret agreement, certainly not made in consultation with the majority of the people, to

 

*

 

[COMMENTS IN SQUARE BRACKETS AND HIGHLIGHTING AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

 

JULY 2014

 
 
Satanic Vatican on Trial for Child Rape & Murder by KEVIN ANNETT (ITCCS.ORG)
 

H F-SP 15

What Damned Cheek!

 The German led EU Commission has.

The Irish vote

'NO' does means 'NO'

NOT Ja!

 

WHY

 

British Business

is

TURNING

 against

 

 EUROPE.

 

DO YOU KNOW?

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

WILFUL BLINDNESS

AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS

 

Vive la Resistance

Autumn 2008 issue

Click above link to read on-line (201kb PDF)
or right-click (PC) or ctrl-click (Mac) to save to disk
(1.5 min on dial-up, instant on broadband)

Hard copy available
 on request

InInformation on previous issue

This page updated: 16 Nov 2008

EU costs the UK £15 billion a year or £41 million an hour in 2005.

 

*

Eurofacts

22nd September 2006.

Vol. 11 No23

 
BBC-EU

ELECTION

RESULTS-

JUNE 10 –2004 

A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?

Now see the mess they have made of it all in

 2008

 

LIES, BALONEY and Peter Hain

 

The remarks of the Secretary of State for Wales conceal the single most important thing the public needs to know about the proposed Constitution for Europe.

 
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY

LIMITATIONS CAN EVER 

BE RELIED ON

67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION

www.worldreports.org

www.c/storyworldreports.org

For the EU' Member States' parliaments followed Hitler's precedent of delegating

'GENERAL POWERS'

-to the centre.

 
EU

skulduggery includes

 political fraud

by deceiving Finland into the

EU Collective Membership.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

elected’ representatives of the satrap EU ‘Member States’, the consent of which to collective treaties has been obtained corruptly, as exposed in this

SPECIAL ISSUE -VOL 30 NUMBER 4

-dated October 10 -2005 [details on EDP- Bulletin Board]

 

FOR KING AND COUNTRY

On 18th June, 1940, after the fall of France, Mr Churchill delivered a speech in the House of Commons which was also broadcast to the NATION.

'For all of us, at this time, whatever our sphere, our station, our occupation or our duties, it will be a help to remember the famous lines:

"He nothing common did or mean, Upon that memorable scene." 

WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

FOR QUEEN AND COUNTRY

In June 2008,

Her Majesty The Queen

will be advised to sign the final EU TREATY which takes away the SOVEREIGNTY of OUR NATION STATE and reduces our once country to a PROVINCE in the UNITED STATES of EUROPE.

Over the past 36 years ALL our PRIME MINISTERS and their associates have been guilty of TREASON.

 

“Let the People Decide”

– Mass lobby of Parliament

27 February 2008

 

www.iwantareferendum.com



Lobby Guide

What time should I arrive?

 

 

AN OBITUARY

 TO YOUR COUNTRY

 WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED

*

HOW a  supposed FREE PRESS failed to FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOM.

 

KISS GOOD BYE! - TO

YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY -

HOW AMERICAN STATE DEPARTMENT HAS PRESSURED THE UK INTO THE EU FOR ALMOST 50 YEARS-

 
SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

  BLOCKBUSTER

EXPOSE

OF THE

 ILLEGAL- CORRUPT 

AND

 UNDEMOCRATIC

 

EUROPEAN UNION

A Criminalized Organisation

 

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

THE

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE AS 'THE NEW EUROPEAN SOVIET

DID YOU KNOW?

'That expansion of the European Union was desirable in principle, since the consequence would be that its power and effectiveness would be diluted. Like almost everything connected to the European Union, this weird logic is upside down and back -to-front.  Diluting the voting power of EU member countries through expansion, diminishes the residual 'power' of the countries further.'

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE exposes the ongoing covert Soviet strategy of seeking to establish

'Europe from the Atlantic to Vladivotok'

'Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals'.

 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

 

OBAMA

FOR PRESIDENT?

 

WE WERE ALARMED

 to hear that a spokesman in the Obama camp

was talking about cooperating with

EU INITIATIVES and COOPERATING

with the

EUROPEAN UNION

 

EU PROPAGANDA MINISTRY NOW PERMITS THE SALE OF BENT BANANAS.

We shall be showered by their generosity of gradually going down their list of stupid and useless Directives and Regulations in order to ensure that their image as a compassionate and understanding Ministry is on the side of the People.

 

 

eurofacts:-5th September,2008

Hurrah for Libertas!

It was reported in the Sunday Telegraph on 20th July 2008 that the Irish millionaire, Declan Ganley , has disclosed far reaching plans to give voters THROUGHOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION a REFERENDUM on the HANDOVER of POWER to BRUSSELS.

But at the election Mr Ganley reverted to PRO-EU stance

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

 

 

H F 12

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports

Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts

-17th October, 2008

 *

[At the General Election Mr Ganley reverted to type and his broadcast was PRO-EU and his party disappeared WITHOUT A TRACE]

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 

ENGLAND is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 

 
 
 

DAILY MAIL

 

SIMON HEFFER:

 

The titanic arrogance that could sink David Cameron

 

 

 

 

 

 

[COMMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTING AND CAPS ARE OURS!

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[A MATTER OF URGENT CONSIDERATION WHILE THERE IS STILL TIME!]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AN ANALYSIS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

 

No 2

 *

For a Europe  of Democracies-Against the Europe of Nations

 by

Paul Ruppen

[We are sure the writer understood that there is no such category as NATIONS in the plans of the EU who have already almost achieved their 1943 aim of a GERMAN dominated EUROPEAN STATE which they have almost managed  to achieve even after TWO WORLD WARS.]

*

 

This extract from a number of articles in the publication

Handshakes not Handcuffs

 

Edited by Lionel Bell

 

[2002]

June Press

www.junepress.com

 

Price £6.99

 

Paul Ruppen a political scientist. Chairman of the Swiss Forum for Direct Democracy and Editor of Europa- Magazin.

 

*          *

 

 Co-operation and local liberty of political action

International relations are becoming more and more important. This is a positive development for those concerned with the politics of peace. What is more, international co-operation is essential to widen the range of political action and the ability of states to solve their problems democratically.  Without such co-operation the struggle for national competitive advantage will overwhelm the desire to solve social and environmental problems.  On the other hand, international co-operation alone cannot assist states in their search for solutions.

 The European  Union and the GATT/WTO  demonstrate that international co-operation may impose competition on countries and regions and lead thereby to social and environmental dumping.  There is, therefore, an urgent need to develop forms of international co-operation that preserve its advantages while avoiding the disadvantages inherent in co-operation of the EU-pattern. The aims of such an alternative development must be a  decentralised co-operative global society, the strengthening of local, regional, 'national' and transnational democracy and the avoidance of euronational bloc-building.

A model will be  developed here of international co-operation that respects local, democratic self -determination( subject always to the protection of human rights of all the people in the area.)

Transnational democracy

a) Existing states need to be decentralised and democratised. Decentralisation should be brought about by assigning competences to the lowest possible level within a state [Ancient Greek pattern]  Democratisation should be brought about by the introduction  of DIRECT DEMOCRACY at every level of the state (communities, areas, districts, regions, cantons etc.)  Every local political authority should have the right to conclude international treaties-within its range of competences-with every foreign political entity.

[We note the prevalent apathy in local  and general elections highlighted recently in the UK but particularly in ENGLAND which says a great deal about so-called DEMOCRACY which has been overridden by the majority of useless, thieving  and  unpatriotic politicians over the past 40 years.]

 b) International relations also have to be decentralised and democratised.

Decentralisation is achieved by solving problems at the lowest level; possible political level.  Only those problems which cannot be solved independently should be solved by international co-operation and then only by the countries directly concerned.  The traffic problems of the Alps have to be solved by the Alpine regions. The problems of North Sea Fisheries, which do not concern the Alpine regions, should be solved only by the North Sea coastal countries.  The application of principles developed in this way would result in a fine and dense network of co-operation without the creation of blocs.

Democratisation of international relations needs to be introduced by greater involvement of the population of the various states in international negotiations. To achieve this we propose the following reforms:

!.  Principle of free access to information.  Political authorities are duty bound to inform the population about current and planned international negotiations; all official negotiating documents have to be published.

2.Institution of conferences at which different social interests can be articulated (e.g. extra-parliamentary commissions where non-government organisations (NGOs) are represented);

3.Right of  citizens of different countries to put forward proposals at the international level (OSCE, UNO, EU, WEU, NATO, environmental conferences etc.)

[Obviously we assume the EU and other international bodies will naturally change to suit the premise being discussed.]

4.  Constitutional obligation on governments to support people's right to participate at the national and international levels.

c)  Minimal social  and environmental standards (Minimum norms with regard to working hours, social charges, environmental taxes etc.) are to be introduced to prevent social and environmental dumping.  These standards may be subject to improvement in particular countries or groups of countries provided this does not damage poorer countries and can be expected to improve in any case in the course of events.  This model permits different countries to experiment with different solutions to problems, a potentially beneficial procedure for all. NGOs (such as trade unions, peace movement, women's movement, environmental movements, consumer protection movements and peasant movements) play an important part in this context.  They provide a counterweight to the power of private corporation lobbies, which are themselves NGO's of a special kind.  The 'divide and rule 'strategy of international capital can be countered by the intensive exchange of information and making it available to the public.  NGO's should therefore have the right to participate in international conferences and have delegates included in international discussions.

 

 

d)  An international clearing house should be developed within which countries' financial surpluses and deficits would be balanced and which would at the same time make it easier to help poorer countries.  Such a system would stabilise exchange rates by fixing them to units based on real value of goods and reduce constraints on countries' ability to pursue independent economic polices.  Existing proposals for such an organisation of the monetary system offer a realistic prospect for different countries to pursue flexible economic policies that are adapted to their own situations and promote full employment in line with national labour practices (e.g. Paul Davidson Economics for a civilised society. Macmillan 1988).  The common aim of these measures against social and environmental dumping and for international monetary reform depend on international cooperation in order to permit greeter freedom of decision-making at the local level. Some kinds of co-operation which place unnecessary limits on local problem -solving.

 

To follow in part 2-The advantages of direct democracy.

 

 

END OF PART 1

PART 2 -TO FOLLOW SHORTLY.

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 JULY-2014

H F 173

 

 

 

 

 

A MEETING PLACE

OF

FREEDOM FIGHTERS FOR A FREE PEOPLE AND A FREE WORLD

DEFENDERS DESTROYERS

 

ILLUMINATI
realzionistnews.

 

NEW WORLD ORDER
JewsnotZionist

 

BILDERBERGER

DAVID ICKE- WORLD TOUR FROM JULY 2011

 

INTER-ALFA BANKS

JEW WATCH

CENTRAL BANKS
 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH

[NEW LINK-TUESDAY 6TH SEPTEMBER,2011]

UK COLUMN.ORG.

 

BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

CONSPIRACYPLANET.COM/
 

 

SEE OUR  MORE EXTENSIVE

MULTI -VIEW  & OVER 1600 BULLETINS & HUNDREDS OF EUROSCEPTIC AND OTHER LINKS.

 

 CLICK BELOW FOR A SELECTION OF PAST MONTHLY INDEX FILES
     
     
PART 2-NOVEMBER-2011    

PART 2-OCT-2011

PART 1 -JULY-2010  
PART 1-SEPT-2011 Page 1-JUNE-2010  
PART 2-AUGUST-2011 PART 1 -MAY-2010  
PART 2-JULY-2011 MAY-ELECTION  
PART 2-JUNE-2011 PART 2-APRIL 2010  
PART 2-MAY-2011 PART 1-MARCH-2010  
PART 2-APRIL-2011 PART1- FEB -2010  
PART 2-MARCH-2011 PART 1-JAN-2010  
PART  2 -FEB -2011 PART-1--DEC-200  

PART 2-JAN 2011

JAN-09 to MAY-09 FEBRUARY-2007

PART 1-DEC-2010

   
PART 1- NOV-2010    
PART1- OCT-2010- TO BE CONTINUED  
PART 1- SEPT2010   PRE-JUNE-2007
PART 1-AUG-2010    
PART 1-JULY-2010   Archive
 
STATEMENT!

 

WE ARE NOW ENTERING THE MOST DANGEROUS ERA IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND. SOON THERE WILL ONLY BE TWO GROUPS OF PEOPLE IN THE WORLD. THOSE WHO WILL DEFEND FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY AND THOSE WHO LOOK AFTER THEIR OWN SELFISH INTERESTS. THE ADVANCES IN SCIENCE HAVE TODAY PUT INTO THE HANDS OF ADVOCATES OF AN ELITIST AND SATANIC  RUN ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT THE MOST DEADLY WEAPONS THE WORLD HAS EVER SEEN. THEY HAVE ACHIEVED THEIR SPECTACULAR COUP OVER CENTURIES BY THE MEANS OF 'GRADUALISM' AND IN ENGLAND WE HAVE SEEN HOW A ONCE FREE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN FOOLED BY THEIR TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS IN ALL THE MAIN PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER.  OVER THE LAST FOUR DECADES THE POPULATION HAS BEEN BRIBED BY EACH GOVERNMENT TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY AND THAT IS WHY THEIR COUNTRY IS IN SUCH A PERILOUS STATE AT THE PRESENT TIME.

THE ANSWER LIES IN THE PAST

The Idea of Popular Sovereignty

'...Hence was generally drawn the inference that the Community still retained a legislative power over the Prince and a permanent control over the exercise of the rights of Rulership.  But in particular, the further inference was drawn that, if the Ruler neglected his duties, the People might sit in  judgement on him and depose him by right and doom.  Just this last consequence was very generally drawn, and a peculiar importance was attributed to it.  Here might be found an explanation of those cases in which the Pope had, or might seem to have, deposed Emperors and Kings and absolved Nations from the duty of subjection.  Such cases might be regarded as legal precedents without any acknowledgement of papal power.  The Pope's part in them had been not 'constitutive' but merely 'declaratory.'  The authority had in all cases proceeded from the Folk or its representative.'

This , it is true, was not always consciously perceived. We can hardly, for instance, assert that Leopold of Babenberg's  mode of thought is republican. yet he expressly teaches that the People of the Empire is maior ipso principe, can make laws, especially if there be  no Kaiser or if the Kaiser neglect his duty, and can for sufficient cause transfer the Empire from one Folk to another or depose the Emperor.  He also teaches that every particular People has just the same right against its King...'

*

The State and Law

Void acts of State

'The properly Medieval and never completely obsolete theory declared that every act of the Sovereign which broke the bounds drawn by the natural law was formally null and void.   As null and void therefore every judge and every other magistrate who had to apply the law was to treat, not only every unlawful executive action, but every unlawful statute, even though it were published by Pope or Emperor.  Furthermore, the unlawful order or unlawful act was null and void for the individual subjects of the State.  It was just for this cause that their duty of obedience was conceived as a conditional duty, and that the right of actively resisting tyrannical measures was conceded to them.'

  Political Theories of the Middle Ages by  OTTO GIERKE  -translated by Frederick William Maitland-1951.

The English people have their  own remedy from the past as shown IN

BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

FIND OUT MORE @ British+constitution

+group+org+uK-

[We have included the above headings from the British Constitution Group because of their succinct and valid historical basis. Much of which has appeared on our website at different times over the past decade but not amassed in full array as the timeless and potent articles of our rights as a free English people justly required.]

THE ENEMY WITHIN

More!

DECEMBER-2011

 

RIP 

IN 2009 WE FACE THE DEMISE OF A NATION STATE OF 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING. THE WORLDS OLDEST PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY BROUGHT DOWN BY THOSE WHO HAD TAKEN THE SACRED OATH WHICH EVEN PARLIAMENT CANNOT REPEAL WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE. IT HAS BEEN THE TREACHERY OF THE QUEEN-HOUSE OF LORDS-HOUSE OF COMMONS AND AN UNPATRIOTIC AND TREASONABLE JUDICIARY WHICH WITH THE COMPLACENCY OF THE MAJORITY OF CITIZENS IN OUR ISLAND HOME WHICH HAS BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH TREACHERY.   

 

ThdCoronation oath

 

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken her coronation oath, by signing these five treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major and Tony Blair.

Realising they stood a good chance of spending the rest of their lives behind bars, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998 (s36.3), which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the five treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her she might have lost her crown (not her life or a limb), and kept her £9 billion plus palaces. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she's dead keen to sign; she's already said she'll sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can then never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a higher and darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI must be turning over in his grave. http://eutruth.org.uk

*

Possibly the answer lies HERE:

SACRED OATH

 

H F-SP40

 

2009

 

                      

 CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

TO

ALL OUR VIEWERS.

 

WE WISH YOU ALL A

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A

 HAPPY NEW YEAR

IN

2009 & 2010 & 2011

 

CHRISTMAS - THE UNTOLD STORY

CHRISTMAS PAST

We asked last year whether Christmas 2009 would be in a country which no longer existed as a FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE or would HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN refuse to sign the TREATY of TREASON which would destroy Christian ENGLAND a unique FREE NATION STATE  of over a thousand years in the making....

to continue

*

AN ENGLISH REPUBLIC

only will save our

'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen'

so recently overthrown by its

' TRAITOROUS PROTECTOR'

The revelations that the Monarchy is now identified as the centuries long ILLUMINATI the secret masonic organisation for WORLD GOVERNMENT

Maybe Prince William would consider placing his future claim to the THRONE of ENGLAND on e-bay.

On second thoughts why bother as we now learn from Tony Robinson in [2009] in one of his recent programmes that the REAL MONARCH of ENGLAND - Prince Michael of the English ancestral family of

HASTINGS

 lives in Australia.  Not being tainted by the

ILLUMINATI

attachment and seeing him in his present environment we would consider him  to be a gentleman and  

TRUE MONARCH

of

ENGLAND.

 

*

A BETRAYAL OF A ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

OF

ENGLAND

[by a member of the House of Windsor has followed that of 'King James II who was considered to have broken [also] a contract made with, not the State, but 'the People.'

DECEMBER 1 - 2009

AFTER MIDNIGHT AND ON DECEMBER I - 2009 ENGLAND CEASED TO TO BE A SOVEREIGN  NATION STATE .  IN FACT OF THE THREE ONCE NATION STATES WITHIN OUR ISLAND HOME THE LAND OF ENGLAND IS NO LONGER MENTIONED ON THE EU MAP OF EUROPE-AND WE HAVE LOST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL IN THE BARGAIN AND WE HAVE DANIEL HANNAN'S CONSERVATIVE PARTY TO THANK FOR IT BECAUSE WITHOUT THE SIGNING OF THE 1992 MAASTRICHT TREATY -THE OPEN DOOR TO THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE  WE WOULD STILL BE A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.      DANNIEL HANNON  HAD THE COMFORT OF A CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHILE ATTACKING ITS POLICIES WHEREAS HE SHOULD HAVE  CUT LOOSE YEARS AGO AND FOUGHT FOR THE CAUSE OF FREEDOM WITHOUT THE LIES AND TREACHEROUS HISTORY OF HIS CONSERVATIVE PARTY.  EVEN THEIR FOREIGN SECRETARY DOUGLAS HURD A  BILDERBERGER

ON SIGNING THE 1992 MAASTRICHT TREATY WAS OVERHEARD SAYING TO HIS COLLEAGUE FRANCIS MAUD 'WE'D BETTER FIND OUT WHAT WE'VE JUST SIGNED .  WE ASK!  DANIEL HANNAN WHAT  KIND OF PARTY HE BELONGS TO THAT WOULD SELL THE PEOPLE INTO SLAVERY WITHOUT EVEN BOTHERING TO READ THE TREATY?  WE BELIEVE THAT THE EUROSCEPTIC CAUSE COULD HAVE TURNED OUT DIFFERENTLY IF DANNIEL HANNON AND OTHERS HAD PUT THEIR COUNTRY'S FREEDOM FIRST BEFORE PARTY AND HAD MOBILISED A GHANDI CAMPAIGN OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE THERE WOULD HAVE BROUGHT EVENTUAL VICTORY.

WE REMIND DANIEL HANNAN THAT SPEECHES IN BRUSSELS ,HOWEVER PATRIOTIC AND HEARTFELT, WILL NOT BRING BACK OUR FREEDOM.  WE NEED HIM BACK HOME TO HEAD A DIRECT ACTION RESISTANCE MOVEMENT

NOW!

DON'T VOTE FOR THE GANG OF THREE AT THE NEXT ELECTION IN 2010 BECAUSE IF YOU DO YOU WILL BE REWARDING TREASON AND THE LOSS OF YOUR FREEDOM-YOUR CONSTITUTION AND YOUR COUNTRY-

UNDER COVER OF A FRAUDULENT

GLOBAL WARMING SCAM

 AGENDA AN EVIL AND SATANIC WORLD GOVERNMENT IS NOW EMERGING

     
            In 1911 a few years before the Great War of 1914 -the war to end wars a historian of Greek History stated from its heroic past ' CITY LAW HAS ABOLISHED FISTICUFFS, AS SOME DAY,WHEN MANKIND HAS BECOME CONSCIOUS OF A COMMON CITIZENSHIP IN THE WORLD AND A COMMON NEED FOR A WORLD-LAW,THE WORLD STATE WILL ABOLISH WAR'  Whether the writer of these words was aware of the ILLUMINATI of his day and their plans for an elite led WORLD GOVERNMENT -which is most likely, as he must have realised that for such an event to take place it would have needed a number of DISINTERESTED STATEMAN OF INTEGRITY AND LOVE OF FREEDOM TO HAVE ANY CHANCE OF ACHIEVING SUCH A STAGGERING MOMENTOUS TASK FOR MANKIND - Instead in the year 2009 we find that those who are the present exponents of a WORLD GOVERNMENT are not those who are DISINTERESTED or which anyone can TRUST and that in FACT there will be many more wars -NOT LESS and no doubt even REVOLUTIONS by the FREEDOM -LOVING PEOPLE of the WORLD in their efforts to remove such an OLIGARTHY OF EVIL SATANIC PURPOSE from the FACE OF THE WORLD.   The recent developments in COPENHAGEN have shown that even though the ILLUMINATI have not yet completed their centuries old ambition to form a WORLD GOVERNMENT under cover of the GLOBAL WARMING SCAM they have still achieved a WORLD GOVERNMENT of sorts under the guise of a GLOBAL WARMING THREAT to MANKIND.   As another writer recently informed us that many people now live in separate boxes  and have lost their once traditional contact with their fellow beings it is no more difficult to rouse the PEOPLE AS ONE when such a matter as the FREEDOM and INDEPENDENCE of ALL is threatened by a small elite served by their servants the BILDERBERGERS and the COMMON PURPOSE CONSPIRACY within the ADMINISTRATION and throughout SOCIETY who owe no allegience to their once MASTERS the PEOPLE THEY SHOULD SERVE and who daily look to foster the aims of their TRUE MASTERS the EVIL AND SATANIC ILLUMINATI.   We believe that only by getting the citizens to work together with likeminded INDIVIDUALS concerned to PROTECT THEIR ACCUSTOMED FREEDOM AND LIBERTIES AND TAKE THEIR CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE PROTEST ON THE STREETS WILL IT SHOW TO OTHERS WHO STILL CANNOT SEE THE DANGERS HOW IMPORTANT IT IS TO BAND TOGETHER AS BROTHERS FOR FREEDOM AND INDEPENDENCE WHILE THERE IS STILL TIME TO DO SO!  FOR THOSE WHO HAD DECIDED THAT THEY HAD MORE IMPORTANT MATTERS TO ATTEND TO THEY SHOULD BE SHOWN BY EXAMPLE THAT FREEDOM AND INDEPENDENCE IS WORTH FIGHTING FOR BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVES OF TYRANNY AND SLAVERY ARE TOO TERRIBLE TO IGNORE!  IN THE MEANTIME REMEMBER THAT AT THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 NEW LABOUR_CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL DEMOCRATICS HAVE ALREADY SIGNED AWAY YOUR 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN' AND A VOTE FOR ANY OF THESE PARTIES IS A VOTE FOR THE EVIL SATANIC ILLUMINATI WHO'S AMBITION FOR A WORLD GOVERNMENT COMPOSED OF AN ELITE OF OVER 6000 OF THE RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL ON EARTH IS ON THE WAY TO BEING ACHIEVED AND A VOTE TO ANY OF THE GANG OF THREE IN YOUR PARLIAMENT  IN THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 WILL BRING THAT CLOSER THAN YOU THINK.   ONLY VOTE FOR THOSE WHO WILL DEFEND YOUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES AND RETURN YOUR FREEDOM-YOUR CONSTITUTION AND YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND TO YOU!  ,/strong>  
     

REMEMBER!

As in the USA with their DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND REPUBLICAN PARTY SO IT IS WITH THE NEW LABOUR AND CONSERVATIVE PARTY.

IT IS A CON THAT IS PLAYED ON YOU! AS THE FOLLOWING VIDEO WILL SHOW!

New World Order - The Two Party Dictatorship

New World Order

- The Two Party Dictatorship

Before you cast your vote at the next General Election whether you are for INDIVIDUALISM and LESS GOVERNMENT or for COLLECTIVISM for MORE GOVERNMENT. If it is real FREEDOM you are after you need to read :http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/

pdf/futurecalling1.pdf

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

[In December 2011 we look back and see that the majority of the PEOPLE decided they would rather take the election Bribes than vote UKIP and  protect THEIR AND THEIR CHILDRENS'S FREEDOM AND ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.]

     
    THIS YOU NEED TO KNOW! - WHY DO WE DO THIS?   TO ALERT YOU! TO WATCH ALEX JONES OF PRISON PLANET.COM - -THE FREEDOM LOBBY IN THE USA. - IT COULD SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -YOUR LIVELIHOOD AND EVEN YOUR LIFE! - JUST FOR ONCE MAKE TIME TO SEE POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO THAT YOU WILL EVER WATCH IN YOUR LIFE! - THE ISSUES ARE MOMENTOUS AND AFFECT EVERY ONE ON OUR PLANET. - MUCH YOU WILL LEARN WILL ASTOUND YOU AND SURPRISE YOU WHEN YOU HEAR HOW THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WHO HAVE BEEN PLANNING THEIR FINANCIAL COUP FOR OVER TWO CENTURIES AND A HALF TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH AN ELITE! OLIGARTHY IN A WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE WORLD'S WEALTHIEST ABD MOST POWERFUL AND LATER TO DISPOSE OF AT LEAST 85% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION. - THESE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ARE PRAYING TO SATAN TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM YOU! - TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - IN FACT YOU HAVE JUST TWO YEARS TO RALLY YOUR NEIGHBOURS TO THE TRUTH AS AN INSIDER HAS STATED THAT THE ELITE HAVE THEIR OWN KIND OF ETHICS WHICH IS TO USE THEIR HOLLYWOOD EMPIRE TO PUT OUT WAR FILMS OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS SHOWING HOW THEY INTEND THEIR PURPOSE - SO YOU HAVE THAT LONG! TO SAVE YOURSELF! - YOUR FAMILY! -YOUR FRIENDS! AND ALL FELLOW BEINGS ON OUR PLANET FROM THE SATANIC OLIGARTHY WHO WISH TO RULE THE WORLD THEIR WAY!- THE VIDEO WILL DETAIL IN ITS 2 HOUR VIDEO PRESENTATION 'THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC'. - IF YOU TURN YOUR FACE AWAY NOW!.-.YOU WILL SUFFER FOR IT!.- WE ARE CONVINCED THAT MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY ARE UNAWARE OF WHAT IS HAPPENNING TO THEIR COUNTRY - NATURALLY THEY ARE LOOKING TO SURVIVE IN ONE OF THE WORST RECESSIONS IN LIVING MEMORY OR HISTORY WHICH HAS BEEN ENGINEERED BY THE ILLUMINATI WHICH INCLUDES THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE - THE MAIN MONEY LENDERS IN THE WORLD SINCE THEIR 18TH CENTURY AND LATER INTRIGUES IN BAVARIA IN THE 19TH CENTURY AND HAVE SUPPORTED BOTH SIDES OF MAJOR WARS AND NO DOUBT SMALLER WARS IN ORDER TO INCREASE THEIR WEALTH AND POWER.- THEIR MAJOR TRIUMPH WAS TO GET THE UNITED NATIONS OFF THE GROUND AFTER WORLD WAR II BY ROCKEFELLER WHO OWNED THE LAND WHICH HE OFFERED IN ORDER THAT THE UN BUILDING COULD BE BUILT IN NEW YORK - SINCE THEN ALL UN ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN PART OF THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION WHICH ENGINNERED A PANDEMIC WHEN THE PREVIOUS CRITERA HAD NOT BEEN REACHED AND WORLD MONETARY FUND AND THE ELITE WHICH IS MADE UP OF OVER 6000 OF THE RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD WHO TO ASSIST THEM HAVE THEIR SERVANTS IN POLITICS - ACADEMICS -PRESS AND MEDIA AND FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE - THE BILDERBERGERS IN ALL YOUR MAIN POLITIOCAL PARTIES TO DO THEIR BIDDING - SUCH AS GORDON BROWN - ED BALLS - PETER MANDELSON - DAVID MILIBAND AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR AND IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY  KENNETH CLARKE - GEORGE OSBORNE - WILLIAM HAGUE -http://www.bilderberg.org/Bilderberg2009. WILLIAM HAGUE - DOUGLAS HURD - AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND NOT FORGETTING THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WITH PADDY ASHDOWN AND OTHERS WHO BY THEIR COMPLICITY INTEND BY VARIOUS MEANS - WAR - TOXIC VACCINES [MERCURY}- POVERTY (DESTRUCTION OF INDUSTRY -CAP AND TRADE) - POLLUTED WATER SUPPLIES- {FLUORIDE A POISON AND OTHER POLLUTANTS - TOXIC AIR SPRAYING AND DETENTION AS IN AMERICA WHERE THERE ARE NOW DETENTION CENTRES OR TO BE MORE PRECISE CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN MANY STATES ACROSS AMERICA IT IS OBVIOUS THE MAN IN THE STREET IS UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE DISASTER AWAITING THEM!  - IN OUR SMALL WAY WE AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR MANY YEARS AS ALEX JONES -PRISON PLANET >COM AND INFOWARS>COM AND MANY OTHER BRAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHEN THEY DISAPEAR FROM SIGHT - YOU WILL TRULY DOOMED TO SLAVERY OR DEATH.- IN OUR OWN ONE MAN CAMPAIGN 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' WE HAVE WITNESSED THE TOTAL IGORANCE OF THE PUBLIC TO WHAT IS IN STORE FOR THEM!  - AT LEAST WE WILL KNOW WHY! - BUT MILLIONS WILL BE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER AS SHEEP AND IT WILL ONLY DAWN ON SOME THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN NOTICE WHEN THEY COULD AND MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE FREE PEOPLE'S OF OUR WORLD! WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED BY OUR PARLIAMENT AND MONARCH - YOU ARE ONLY MONTH'S AWAY FROM LOSING YOUR ANCIENT FREEDOMS - YOUR UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY OF OVER 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING! - UNLESS YOU STIR YOURSELVES!          THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 COULD BE THE LAST! - AS LISBON TREATY SAYS SO! - AS REGIONS/PROVINCES WILL BE THE ORDER OF THE DAY - REMEMBER WHETHER YOU VOTE NEW LABOUR - CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS YOU HAVE AGREED TO LOSE YOUR INHERITED SACRED 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN' - WHICH SHOULD BE PASSED ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS -  BECAUSE THEY WOULD RATHER 'SELLETH HIS BIRTHRIGHT FOR A MESS OF POTTAGE'                           MAIN ISSUES BULLETIN-UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                           EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                           WHEN THE LISBON TREATY IS RATIFIED BY ALL!     YOUR PENALTY WILL BE SLAVERY! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU! - ON DECEMBER 1-2009 THE TREATY CAME INTO BEING AND ENGLAND DISAPPEARED FROM HISTORY AND EVEN FROM THE MAP OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE AND LOST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL IN THE BAD BARGAIN! - THANKS TO SCOTSMAN GORDON BROWN WHO WITH HIS TARTAN CLAN HAS CERTAINLY TAKEN REVENGE FOR PAST TIMES!               Click           Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the           1999 European Elections.               Click           Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                 LINKS FROM BULLETIN FILE TO OTHER FILES!    nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ONLY MILLIONS ON THE STREETS CAN NOW SAVE US NOW! - BUT THERE IS NO LEADER OF FREEDOM TO COMPARE WITH OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL - TO RALLY THE PEOPLE! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!     OVER 1'600 BULLETIN'S! AVAILABLE HERE!  
     

 

DON'T MISS IT! -THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC - HOW THE FREEDOM OF PEOPLE WORLD WIDE IS NOW IN DANGER!

 

 A REMINDER!---A MESSAGE YOU FAILED TO HEED SINCE 2003!

 

QUEEN & COUNTRY?

 

 

 

STATEMENT!

 ON THE DEATH OF A NATION STATE CALLED

ENGLAND

[We expect the people of Scotland and Wales to decide their future in their own puppet Assembles.]

OUR ONCE RENOWNED AND RESPECTED MONARCHY AND PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM BROUGHT INTO BEING AFTER THE 1689 GLORIOUS REVOLUTION IS

NO LONGER FIT FOR PURPOSE.

OVER THE PAST TWELVE MONTHS WE HAVE SEEN YOUR MONARCH- YOUR HOUSE OF LORDS AND YOUR COMMONS BY A MAJORITY  SELL

YOUR CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY

TO

A FOREIGN POWER.

AND THE PEOPLE IN THE MAIN JUST YAWNED AND GOT ON WITH THEIR LIVES.

THEY ARE IN FOR SUCH A SHOCK WHEN THEY FIND THAT THEY ARE SOON MERELY NON-PERSONS WITHIN A PROVINCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE WHICH IN SOME PARTS CROSS ONCE NATIONAL BORDERS.

JUST A PEEK AT

TREASON AT LISBON

 

WILL OPEN YOUR EYES

BUT WHATEVER YOU FIND, THERE WILL SOON BE NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT! BUT IN THE MEANTIME YOU CAN GET YOUR REVENGE

ON

JUNE 4-2009

VOTE FOR COUNTRY

NOT FOR

 THE FAILED TRIPARTITE GANG OF TRAITORS IN WESTMINSTER WHO GOT YOU IN THE MESS IN THE FIRST TIME.

YOU HAVE SEEN WHAT THE MAJORITY OF THE RATS IN PARLIAMENT ARE IN IT FOR THE MONEY AND POWER AND NOT TO SERVE  AND PROTECT YOUR CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.

THIS IS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO PAY BACK THE CORRUPT TRAITOROUS TIME SERVERS AND GET THEM BACK ON THE STREETS LOOKING FOR A JOB BUT UNFORTUNATELY FOR YOU THEY HAVE MADE A FORTUNE ON THE TAXPAYER-

 YES! -WE MEAN YOU

WHO LET THEM GET AWAY WITH THEIR LOOT AND WHO WILL BE LAUGHING WITH THEIR CHUMS THE BANKERS WHO ARE NOW EMPTYING THE DEEP POCKETS OF THE

TAXPAYER.

 

[There are over 1000 bulletins on the corrupt-unaccountable ,undemocratic and demonic EU in our

EU FILE

MAIN BULLETINS FILE

 

There is every possibility that the GOVERNMENT will decide to have the GENERAL ELECTION and LOCAL ELECTIONS on the same day

JUNE 4-2009

This will be possibly your last chance to let them know what you think of the expensive time servers and traitors to boot as within the EU treaties there is provision for the disbanding of ALL national political parties and the substitution of EU friendly substitutes within the Regionalisation programme which will be undertaken shortly after the LISBON TREATY is ratified by ALL EU member states.

So if you are anxious that the traitors THE GANG OF THREE IN WESTMINSTER who have sold your CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER are reminded of their TREASON on JUNE4-2009. Let them know by giving your VOTE elsewhere. By so doing you will have made YOUR PROTEST and with such a scanty return of members to the NEW PARLIAMENT it will be an indictment of the actions of previous GOVERNMENTS and in years to come you will be able to say to your grandchildren that YOU helped turn the TIDE in TIME and so changed the future history of YOUR COUNTRY.

*

*

100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

*

SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

 by WINSTON CHURCHILL

*

 
" A DECLARATION OF RESISTANCE"

The Magna Carta 1215-1297 & Bill of Rights 1689 & Queen Elizabeth II Coronation Oath Act

But as we are now well aware the majority of the English people ignored the warnings of the DANGERS to their FREEDOMS and LIBERTIES and CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY and the 'FEW' continued TALKING -TALKING and even MORE TALKING as they still do today in MARCH 2009

 

RIP 

IN 2009 WE FACE THE DEMISE OF A NATION STATE OF 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING. THE WORLDS OLDEST PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY BROUGHT DOWN BY THOSE WHO HAD TAKEN THE SACRED OATH WHICH EVEN PARLIAMENT CANNOT REPEAL WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE. IT HAS BEEN THE TREACHERY OF THE QUEEN-HOUSE OF LORDS-HOUSE OF COMMONS AND AN UNPATRIOTIC AND TREASONABLE  JUDICIARY WHICH WITH THE COMPLACENCY OF THE MAJORITY OF CITIZENS IN OUR ISLAND HOME WHICH HAS BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH TREACHERY.   

 

 

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID NOTHING!

H F -S P 6

 

 

 

 

*

 
On the CINEMA screens across England this week in March 2009 we have a story of young Queen Victoria who in her long reign defended HER PEOPLE and COUNTRY from foreign powers. In 2008 the present named Queen sold her country and her people to a foreign Power and her people into slavery.

The once Monarch of a free people treasonably signed a  BILL of Parliament and became but an ordinary citizen of the EU.  so why  hasn't the pretence of constitutional monarchy along with the Honours system and christmas messages not been scrapped?

 

*

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

as well

This provides the twisted rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he continued to serve as President.

Dr Herzog's subversive remarks have special resonance for Britain, where

QUEEN ELIZABETH II

 is the

 SOVEREIGN AND CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD

of the

UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

She is the custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her father,  This was confirmed initially when the

QUEEN took the OATH of ACCESSION

and was finally solemnised at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognised and universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful

 SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH PEOPLE

In November 2000 -after a correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair; to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness jay; and to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders and dignitaries -asking:

Is Her Majesty the Queen Sovereign?

HE RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL

or else a non-committal weak, diversionary reply.

Mr Blair being unable to answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry  to the Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark of the

BLAIR GOVERNMENT

has been its Ministers' arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary questions.  Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point on occasion, of'

' standing the Queen up'

by failing to turn up on time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.

 

WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.

 

[Further details to follow]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

 

 

*

 

 

THE QUEEN- ANGRY THAT HER PALACES NEED URGENT REPAIRS-BUT GOVERNMENT WILL NOT PAY

 

-NO MATTER THAT CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH HER MAJESTY

WASTED NO TIME IN SELLING THE

 

the accustomed

 

"RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN"

IN DIRE HASTE IN JUNE -2008

AND

HER PEOPLE TO A FOREIGN POWER

Why should the Government want to spend money on BUILDINGS which will REMIND the PEOPLE of their long ILLUSTRIOUS HISTORY and its UNIQUE

   PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY.

which will become a

THEME PARK

to demonstrate the decline of a once free, proud-stoic enterprise and hardy people who more than most in the last few centuries has championed and fought for 

FREEDOM in EUROPE

with the death of millions of its people -and great financial sacrifice , with the support of other countries  and the

 English Speaking Nations

in

TWO WORLD WARS

 

and now in JUNE-2008 to be 

BETRAYED

by their

MONARCH

and a

TRAITOROUS GOVERNMENT

 

AND THE TRAITOROUS ACTIONS OF MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE'S REPRESENTATIVES IN THEIR

PARLIAMENT

 

Once THE QUEEN had signed away HER COUNTRY and PEOPLE many of her once loyal subjects must wonder what is the point of the massive public expense for a SHAM institution which is no longer the  sacred office of KINGSHIP but a MOCKERY of the true grit and loyalty so often shown by our greatest MONARCHS of the PAST in particular

 

QUEEN ELIZABETH THE FIRST OF ENGLAND

 

in

DEFENDING OUR FREEDOM.

 

[As we had learnt in June 2008 an English Constitution is only sacrosanct  in the hands of a Monarch who is a true defender of the English People. The words of Aristotle born 384 B.C -died 322 B.C.  are as true today in July 2008

'The rule of the best man is better than the rule of the best law'

This is obvious because the best safeguards of an English Constitution can be BETRAYED as we have seen by our PARLIAMENT and QUEEN Whereas the rule of loyal Sovereign determined to protect the sacred rights of the  English People can never be surpassed. Unfortunately, as events have shown, our very Rights and Liberties were cast aside as of no significance and no doubt  HER MAJESTY would say

'I was just doing my job'

and THEY  'MY PEOPLE'  must do as as they are told and be pleased to dispense with their accustomed English Law and Customs and independent Nation State  and FREE ENTERPRISE trading with the world and instead to embrace  enthusiastically a continental , corrupt  police state ,with a PROTECTIVE SOCIALISED TRADING SYSTEM and  FOREIGN LAW  without the safeguards of the 1215 Great Charter of MAGNA CARTA  to a servile place as 'Good European' citizens

in

 

A TREATY TOO FAR!

*

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

 

JUNE 28-2008

 

*

 
 

 

In 2005 William Rees -Mog stated "Thank God we elected a Monarch."

How this can change in only 4 years.

[IT IS MAY 2009-LAST YEAR HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SIGNED THE LISBON TREATY WITHOUT PUTTING PRESSURE -'TO WARN' THAT SHOULD THE PRIME MINISTER DENY HER PEOPLE A REFERENDUM THEN SHE WOULD VETO THE TREATY. IT HAS NOW ONLY RECENTLY COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT THE QUEEN IS ONE OF THE PROMINENT MASONIC FIGURES IN THE

NEW WORLD ORDER

 SO THAT THE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CHEATED FOR 47 YEARS THINKING THAT THEIR QUEEN WOULD STAND BY HER SOLEMN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO HER PEOPLE AND COUNTRY.]

*

Thank God we elected a Monarch

By

William Rees-Mogg

(Independent Peer)

Daily Mail

Sunday, April 3, 2005.

…I am glad to be an Independent peer; I do not have a party and do not have a vote. Of course, I always support my children wherever they may be standing. None of the above criticisms applies at this Election to the admirable Conservative candidate for Aberavon. But she shall remain anonymous.

It is not the least of the merits of a hereditary Monarchy that the Queen, and the other senior members of the Royal Family, are above the fray.

The Monarchy would not have lasted for well over a thousand years if the Monarch had been involved in the General Election every four years and been forced to use stale and mendacious arguments to discredit some alternative line.

In the 18th century, the House of Hanover did have to defeat the House of Stuart on two occasions, 1715 and 1745. Even those dates are 30 years apart. No Stuart rebellion has been attempted since. That is just as well as they were a very unfortunate family.

Constitutional Monarchy is one of the great English discoveries. It separates the struggle for power from the ultimate authority.

The Monarch has no power, decides nothing except the choice of her Ladies- in -Waiting, the membership of the Garter and Order of Merit, the seating at State banquets and which statesman to call to office if the General Election produces a tie.

When I come to think of it, that might be a good outcome, with 207 MP’s for Labour, 207 Conservatives, 207 Liberal Democrats, 25 others and the Speaker. The Queen would have some arithmetic to perform; that will not happen, though it would correspond more closely to voters’ real preferences than any result we are likely to get. Arguably it might also produce a better government.

It is sometimes said, particularly by Scottish patriots that in English theory sovereignty belongs to the Monarch, but in Scotland, as in the United States, to the people.

I do not know for sure about Scottish constitutional theory. I do know that as recently as 1689 - the day before yesterday by standards of our national history -William and Mary were crowned King and Queen of England at Westminster before they had heard whether they were also to be King and Queen of Scotland.

Until 1707 and the Act of Union, the parliamentary process was separate and different for both kingdoms.

Most of us think of England as having a purely hereditary Monarchy, but England does not. Our constitutional Monarchy is itself elective and therefore democratic. The Queen sits on her throne by virtue of an Act of Parliament, the Act of Settlement 1701.

That is her title deed to the Crown. It was passed, like any other Act of Parliament, by both Houses.

 According to the historian Bishop Burnet, Sir John Bowles ‘who was then disordered in his senses and soon after quite lost them’, was put up to propose Sophia, the Electress Dowager of Brunswick, and her heirs as the line that would eventually follow Queen Anne. That was carried in Committee of the House of Commons; the Act went through the Lords with only four dissenters and Sophia’s son eventually became George I.

The history goes back much further than that. In 1399, King Richard II was forced to abdicate in favour of his cousin, King Henry IV, who was John of Gaunt’s eldest son. Parliament, sitting in Westminster Hall, then elected Henry as King. He was our first elected Monarch.

[Since that of King Alfred - Alfred the Great in 871. Many would say one of the greatest Kings of the English.]

In 1571, Queen Elisabeth’s Parliament resolved that it alone had the right to determine the succession, and that it would be high treason for anyone to question Parliament’s right.

In 1642, Parliament fought and won the Civil War to determine the issue of ultimate power. In 1660, Parliament invited King Charles II to return.

Britain does have a hereditary Monarchy but it is established by parliamentary votes. Parliaments have made the Monarchy the keystone to our democratic constitution.

The Act of Settlement itself could be amended, or on theory, repealed by a further Act of Parliament. There is no head of steam for republicanism, but amendment is now probable. Even in this General Election, Michael Howard has proposed that the Act’s bar on Roman Catholics should be removed. It is, I suspect, already unenforceable.

 

[Like almost anything in what is left of our Constitution - the Rock has been chipped away at for the past 32 years]

If Prince William wanted to marry a Roman Catholic, which he does not, it would be politically impossible to keep him from the throne on those grounds. [We expect the existence of Human

Rights Act will be invoked.]

Prince Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry now come first in the line of succession; if they were to fail, there would be a strong movement to put the Princess Royal next in line rather than her younger brothers. Parliament does not believe in gender discrimination, nor does the Human Rights Act. Fortunately this is a very remote possibility.

 

The Monarchy contributes six key virtues to our Constitution. These are:

Impartiality,

Duty,

Personality,

Authority,

Unity

And Permanence.

The idea of a national authority which is personal humanises the inevitable bureaucracy of the State. Few of us would watch a Christmas broadcast by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

However high-minded they are, politicians can never be genuinely impartial, as impartial journalists who become politicians have repeatedly found. There is a choice of loyalties to be made.

No political leader has permanence however powerful or imposing he may seem at the time - I doubt whether Tony Blair, Michael Howard or Charles Kennedy will be leading their parties into the General Election after this one.

Politicians are mayflies, creatures for the day. The Crown is for centuries.[?]

The Monarch exchanges power, which belongs to the Prime Minister with a majority in the House of Commons, for permanence and authority. Their two functions are quite different. For my part, I feel like saying:

‘God bless our politicians; thank God for the Queen.’

[We would say most sincerely:

‘God help our politicians; thank God for the Queen.

 

[How wrong we were to believe we could count on a Queen with the illustrious name of ELIZABETH of ENGLAND]

*

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

APRIL/05

*          *         *

[IT IS MAY 2009-LAST YEAR HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SIGNED THE LISBON TREATY WITHOUT PUTTING PRESSURE -TO WARN THAT SHOULD THE PRIME MINISTER DENY HER PEOPLE A REFERENDUM THEN SHE WOULD VETO THE TREATY.  IT HAS NOW ONLY RECENTLY COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT THE QUEEN IS ONE OF THE PROMINENT MASONIC FIGURES IN THE NEW WORLD ORDER SO THAT THE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CHEATED FOR 47 YEARS THINKING THAT THEIR QUEEN WOULD STAND BY HER SOLEMN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO HER PEOPLE AND COUNTRY.]

 

[ADDED TO BULLETIN IN MAY-2009]

 

 

 

 

   
 

ARMED FORCES DAY -A TRAITOROUS BETRAYAL BY QUEEN -LORDS AND COMMONS OF ENGLAND

YES! ENGLAND!

for when Gordon Brown was saluting our troops from the Normandy beaches he was introduced as the ENGLISH Prime Minister. SCOTLAND DIDN'T WANT HIM even though he was one of THEIR COUNTRYMAN -WALES DIDN'T WANT HIM as the results of the last election on JUNE4  clearly demonstrated.

At home A person who was Queen before the Maastricht Treaty was signed by HER once HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN took the salute of as a CITIZEN of the EUROPEAN UNION of  HER once ARMED FORCES which with the signing of the LISBON TREATY will put ALL our Forces under EU COMMAND.

We had a fly-past to remind us when we were ONCE an INDEPENDENT NATION STATE with a CONSTITUTION and a  unique PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY the  hallowed -renowned and world respected 'Mother of Parliaments' whereas in June 2009 the CITIZEN of the EU had in June 2008 signed away the FREEDOMS -CONSTITUTION-and even the COUNTRY of ENGLAND to an enemy of TWO WORLD WARS for which over 2,000,000 of our Armed Forces gave their lives.

We saw our ARMED FORCES marching together along ENGLISH streets to turn their eyes in salute to a CITIZEN of the EU who with HER signing of the LISBON TREATY by that CITIZEN  our forces will find themselves fighting in foreign countries alongside German-French and other EU troops  knowing that they had left behind in their ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT COUNTRY a LAND which no longer bore the ancient name of a once PROUD and FIERCE PEOPLE of ENGLAND and  as far as our ancient enemies were concerned neither was our territory allowed to be kept in place but carved up like a LAMB to the SLAUGHTER.  And the greater majority of THE ENGLISH DID NOTHING!

Those who have turned their backs on their country will not be pleased when in the very near future as our ARMED FORCES will be in foreign fields so in the alleyways - lanes -streets of ENGLAND foreign troops will be used to quell  dissent and rebellion.

By HER signing the Maastricht Treaty the once QUEEN became a CITIZEN of the EU and since then we have witnessed a SHAM of supposed MONARCHY which in finally signing the LISBON TREATY has taken away those ancient Rights and Liberties of Englishmen which by HER CORONATION OATH the now CITIZEN had sworn TO PROTECT.

What we have all witnessed since 1953 is a sickening display of deceit and chicanery by a once QUEEN of ENGLAND who preferred to keep HER PROMISE to HER ILLUMINATI BROTHERHOOD than give HER ONCE PEOPLE a CHOICE by REFERENDUM as to their FUTURE as a once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND which DESTINY had ordained FOR HER.

Some will say God Save The Queen because many in our once free country have now after the now CITIZEN of the EU has signed the

LISBON TREATY

HAVE NO REASON TO DO SO.

We are told our servicemen and women are fighting for  THEIR COUNTRY but in truth they are being killed-injured and maimed

 NOT to PROTECT THEIR FREEDOMS

NOT to PROTECT THEIR CONSTITUTION

NOT to PROTECT THEIR COUNTRY

BUT

 to further the centuries old plan of the ILLUMINATI for the destruction of NATION STATES and the replacement by a

 WORLD GOVERNMENT

*

http://vodpod.com/watch/1516212-12-the-hidden-convenat-of-the-illuminati-agenda-and-the-4-

*

In 1860 Queen Victoria did not agree but Lord John Russell assured HER that the doctrines of the Glorious Revolution of 1688 the best writers on International law consider it a merit to overthrow

"all power held by Sovereigns may be forfeited by misconduct and every nation is the judge of its own internal government." 

and over the past 37 years the Queen has been complicit with every administration in signing away the inherited Rights and Liberties of the English People and in particular the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the "OPEN DOOR" to a UNITED STATES OF EUROPE and the final betrayal the signing of the LISBON TREATY without assuring that the voice of the people should be heard in a REFERENDUM.

We now hear that the QUEEN the richest person in our ONCE COUNTRY or more accurately the CITIZEN of the EU who as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the EU COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY appears to be asking for more money from the hard-pressed TAXPAYER in order to prevent the remaining features of a crumbling SHAM MONARCHY from having to look on hard times as her ONCE subjects are having to do. We hear that there is a Diamond Jubilee planned for 2013 and the desecration of our greatest inheritance in order to attempt to deceive the English people that the CITIZEN of the EU had any right to expect such acknowledgement for  having betrayed the ENGLISH PEOPLE with the loss of their PRICELESS INHERITANCE which the CITIZEN QUEEN failed to DEFEND. The shear arrogance of the MONARCHY defies belief and an OLIVER CROMWELL arriving on the scene today in 2009 would have sent them 'bag and baggage" from our Island Home to the remotest place on the planet where their deceitful machinations can be left to convert those other marching Monarchs who will no doubt distain to share their space which they inhabit in the wastes of the South Pole.

What a relief it would be to have a Republican Constitution with the so-called honour's system consigned to the refuse bin with the majority of the recipients - the  many of whom betrayed THEIR COUNTRY and who should be sent on their way without their gold-plated pensions as THEIR REWARD.

The latest disclosures in the House of Commons was to be expected. What we ask is WHY only go back 5 years -Why not 10 or 15 years. No doubt the majority of traitors in the House have been filling their pockets for years. As we have said for many a year MPs should SERVE THE PEOPLE for ONE TERM of PARLIAMENT and then they would have been more accountable to the VOTER.

REMEMBER  that YOU have been BETRAYED since 1972 and since then the RICH have been getting RICHER and the POOR getting POORER. So not only have they taken your ONCE respected CONSTITUTION from YOU and YOUR ACCUSTOMED RIGHTS and LIBERTIES they have turned the MAJORITY of YOU into spineless and obedient voters by the GREATEST BRIBERY of the past three decades which have turned YOUR ONCE COUNTRY to a fitful picture of a hand open divisive society more in keeping with the Circuses of old ROMAN EMPIRE and the 20th century` CUBAN BANANA REPUBLIC.

Gordon Brown and his BILDERBERGER bedfellows Ed Balls and Peter Mandleson are now wasting time-YOUR TIME! because the longer Gordon Brown's comic circus stays on the road the less chance there will be of a GENERAL ELECTION and a possible last chance of a REFERENDUM before the LISBON TREATY is finally RATIFIED by GERMANY because contrary to what you are told GERMANY by agreement at the inception of the EU is the final signatory of the TREATY OF SLAVERY of the PEOPLES of EUROPE.

BUT the chances of a GENERAL ELECTION are nigh IMPOSSIBLE because the so-called OPPOSITION PARTY with their suspect DAVE have their own BILDERBERGERS -Kenneth Clarke - George Osborne - William Hague

WANT

 what Gordon Brown and his ilk

WANT

A

NEW WORD ORDER

and a

WORLD GOVERNMENT

*

What we need is a REVOLUTION and millions of pushing buttons can get it going BUT in the end ONLY having their feet on the ground and millions around them will they have any chance to regain THEIR FREEDOMS-THEIR CONSTITUTION [amended]-THEIR COUNTRY. YOU have ONLY a FEW MONTHS to DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT because when the LISBON TREATY is ratified you will NO LONGER HAVE A COUNTRY and as for YOUR FREEDOM that will be drastically curbed and YOUR INTERNET censored as they are slowly doing at the present time.

NEVER IN THE FIELD OF HISTORY HAS SO MUCH TALK BEEN UTTERED AND SO MUCH FREEDOM LOST BY SO MANY.

*

http://vodpod.com/watch/1516212-12-the-hidden-convenat-of-the-illuminati-agenda-and-the-4-

*

*

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100001586/lisbon-treaty-britain-should-not-settle-for-less-than-germany/

*

http://www.youtube.com/user/YouDeserveToKnow

*

http://www.henrymakow.com/illuminati_bankers_planned_wor.html

[This video claims that King Edward VII connived with the International Bankers Rothchilds to bring about the FIRST WORLD WAR which resulted in the deaths of at least 1,275.000 of our servicemen. The Second World War was also planned by the same International Bankers with the loss of 250,000 of our service personnel.  For Europe as a whole the deaths were in the region of 50/60 million at least. 

'On the eve of the Great War, and still more amid the conflict of ideologies to which it has given birth, Britain occupies a middle path, in which social and political progress are to be slowly and steadily built up by men of practical experience upon old and well - tested foundations imposed neither by the whim of an autocrat nor by the decree of some inhuman doctrinaire.  HER interests are more WORLD WIDE than ever before, and HER need for PEACE is correspondingly GREATER:  this explains the eagerness with which men spoke of "WAR to end WAR".  ADVERSITY has on the whole taught even those of us who genuinely believe in DEMOCRACY to admit that it is a phrase capable of much MISINTERPRETATION, and that BRITAIN stands above all REPRESENTATIVE INSTITUTIONS - infinitely adaptable to each INDIVIDUAL CASE -and FREEDOM of THOUGHT, SPEECH and ACTION, alike in the RELIGIOUS, the INTELLECTUAL, the POLITICAL, the SOCIAL and the ECONOMIC FIELD.  THE LESSON of the 19th century is HER READINESS to COLLABORATE with any COUNTRY irrespective of POLITICAL CREED or SYSTEM,

BUT

NOT AT THE EXPENSE OF HER OWN FREE INSTITUTIONS, and ONLY on the basis of INTERNATIONAL PEACE and CO-OPERATION. [Caps ours]

[last paragraph of the Epilogue of BRITAIN in EUROPE-1789-1914 by Seton Watson(1937)

Against this poignant background we have had over the past few days the sickening unedifying sycophancy of sections of the PRESS towards a MONARCH who had a choice between honouring HER CORONATION OATH to PROTECT our FREEDOMS and LIBERTIES of the PEOPLE or keep faith with HER ILLUMINATI ancestors -the latter was HER CHOICE. It is said the proof is its final accomplishment and in the case of our almost loss of our accustomed Rights and Liberties of Englishmen and our PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY -CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY which will become a reality as soon as the LISBON TREATY is RATIFIED by GERMANY.

Back in April 2004 we attended a meeting at the House of Lords to hear a plea by philip benwell MBE of the Australian Monarchist Party on the subject of

 THE Commonwealth Realms

V

The Constitution For Europe

"Inasmuch as the Crown is the symbol of the free association of the members of the British Commonwealth of nations-united by a common allegiance to the Crown"

the Statute of Westminster 1931.

*

Our basic Liberties and Freedoms – to be surrendered to a Foreign Power?

*

We now hear that the CITIZEN of the EU is to give to the families of the fallen since 1948 a medal as a commemoration of the sacrifice of their loved ones who went to war because they believed that they were laying their lives down for THEIR FREEDOMS -THEIR CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY whereas the cruel reality is that we are ONLY a matter of months away from losing ALL THREE. We are sure that the spirits of the dead must feel that they have been BETRAYED with their families receiving a CROSS to BEAR as a reminder of the loss not only of their loved ones but of the loss of that which they believed they were fighting for would be passed on to future generations THEIR FREEDOMS-THEIR PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY-THEIR CONSTITUTION and THEIR COUNTRY .

When future generations are shown the medal and told that the CITIZEN of the EU gave this to their families and the loss of their treasured INHERITANCE they will wonder how it was possible for a PEOPLE with a long illustrious inheritance of freedom and the world's oldest parliamentary democracy , of over 1500 years in a land that became ENGLAND could shortly after they lost everything that their loved one's died for in order to be part of a satanic- undemocratic- unaccountable UNITED STATES OF EUROPE early in 2010

*

 

/PETER-OBORNE-Our-Right-Honorable-liars-debauching-democracy-ALSO-A VITAL VICTORY in the WAR against EURO-DICTATORSHIP-Saturday,July4,2009 [The heroic Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg's third son Count Franz Ludwig von Stauffenberg, is leading the GERMAN RESISTANCE against the LISBON TREATY and in the past week won a vital victory-He secured a senational ruling from the GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT.

*

http://synonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2009/07/gott-im-himmel-the-german-people-say-nein-to-more-europe.html -JULY-2009

*

82 Million Germans NOT GIVEN A REFERENDUM

[The EDP fought the 1997 General Election and the 1999 European Election with our 

of a separate English Constitutional Court to PROTECT the RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of the ENGLISH PEOPLE

NOW YOU CAN SEE THAT THE GERMAN PEOPLE KNEW THE VALUE OF SUCH A COURT WHEREAS IN ENGLAND WE PLACED OUR TRUST IN POLITICIANS AND OVER 37 YEARS WE HAVE BEEN BETRAYED.

*

 

TREASON-A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS by NORRIS McWHIRTER

-Lest we forget

*

LISBON TREATY -THE TREATY OF TREASON

 

*

www.bilderberg.org/skulbone.htm

*

www.bilderberg.org/index.htm

*

www.JEWSNOTZIONISTS.ORG

 

JUNE 27-2009

 

 

   
 

AN ACT OF BETRAYAL BY THE QUEEN IN 2008

Our English History of Monarchy since the reign of the loyal sovereign Queen Elizabeth I who was protected by voluntary associations determined to keep HER MAJESTY safe from HER ENEMIES in 1584 which was later passed by an ACT of PARLIAMENT,  The abject Treachery of the Stuarts and of the Hanovian Monarchy of the House of Hanover descended from the  Guelfs or Welfs of BAVARIA which has resulted in their ancestor Elizabeth II  in June 2008 selling the  birthright of the 'RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN' to our past enemy of TWO WORLD WARS -the GERMAN FOURTH REICH  better known as the UNITED STATES OF EUROPE as it is now known. The BETRAYAL was completed by a degenerate blackguard   traitorous  scoundrel and  unprincipled SCOTSMAN calling himself recently an ENGLISH PRIME MINISTER and  HIS TARTAN CLAN who seem to have forgotten THEIR OWN history of what it means  from the Arbroath Manifesto sent by the Nobles and Commons of SCOTLAND to the POPE in 1320 to'...but for that freedom which no man will surrender but with his life'.  Our above symbol shows the important dates in our history of our beginning in this land of ENGLAND and of our FREEDOMS since MAGNA CARTA] 

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS by the tireless PATRIOT- the late NORRIS MCWHIRTER

A MAN OF PRINCIPLE

Another Scotsman of another generation but of firm Christian principle who in competing in the 1924 Paris Olympics refused to run on the Sabbath even though he was faced with the ardent request of the Prince of Wales (later Edward the VIII who became a close friend and confident of Adolf Hitler- See-'Britain's Nazi King -Revealed - PART ONE -8PM Channel 5 -Thursday,16th July,2009) and others of the Committee, but refused to go against his FAITH.  His close friend and rival on the track a Jewish student at the last moment found a way for him to compete on another day.  Eric Liddell won his race and after left to take up Missionary work in China.  Years earlier after  competing in a race successfully he gave a speech to his close followers who scrambled around him to hear him speak at the end of the event. In his brief message he compared the Christian faith as running in a race and requires concentration and will. He said that Jesus said the kingdom of God is within us and that if you collect yourself in the love of Christ... -these events were dramatically portrayed in the Film the 'Chariots of Fire'.

*

A MAN OF PRINCIPLE IN OUR TIME

A SOLDIER'S GENERAL

HOW NEW LABOUR HATE IT!

*

JULY16 -2009

 

   

 

A CONSPIRACY OF EVIL CALLING ITSELF

COMMON PURPOSE

Common Purpose is a corrupt, subversive, secretive and deeply sinister organisation with a hidden agenda (Communitarian Neo-Communism, social control, corporate and EU state control)

WITH AN AGENDA OF DECEPTION MADE IN

HELL

-CHILDREN ABDUCTED AND SUSPICION OF BEING USED FOR DRUG TESTING AND FOR SEX

IN

YOUR TOWN HALL and in CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

 

FIND OUT MORE

Brian Gerrish on Edge Media TV - 4/5 Common Purpose & the Fabians - Michael Tsarion Brian Gerrish Hilarious Claims Brian Gerrish on Alex Jones Tv 3/3:The Truth About The Common Purpose Group in The UK

The revelations will astound you but remember that the doctrine that will be revealed to you is not new and follows the ancient Roman Fabian creed of gradualness which also is the plan of the

 

NEW WORLD ORDER

and their plans for

WORLD GOVERNMENT

Their task is to destroy the family unit to cause a massive increase in crime and indoctrinate the people to their satanic way of thinking.

DON'T BELIEVE IT?

Then click on the above videos and get a shock which should arouse YOUR ANGER and YOUR ACTION.

The breakdown of society is the one sure way to CONTROL the POPULATION and HIDE its own deceitful agenda as outlined in the :

 KGB-CHART OF DESTRUCTION

*

LISBON TREATY-THE TREATY OF TREASON

*

If you think appeals to David Cameron to eradicate the subversive policy against the  family and nation state you are greatly mistaken.  Remember that the

GANG OF THREE

in

WESTMINSTER

all have their

BILDERBERGERS

who are the  originators of the doctrine.  In the Conservative Party Shadow Cabinet there are  at least three members: Kenneth Clarke - George Osborne - William Hague. 

AS with the main political parties in the USA behind the scenes they are all ONE for a NEW WORLD ORDER and WORLD GOVERNMENT whatever they say to you between elections.

*

 

*

COMMON PURPOSE = COMMON INTEREST =COMMON BENEFIT NOT PUBLIC SERVICE

*

We would go further and call the subversive system of Common Purpose a Mafia which by definition is' a preference for private and unofficial rather than legal justice'  Because where is there accountability if persons are chosen to join their CONSPIRACY the definition of which is 'The act of conspiring together for a secret purpose' THEIR COMMON PURPOSE.

Some might question the comparison but when you have learned of the harassment of Mr  Brian Gerrish -THREATS AGAINST HIS LIFE -BROKEN WINDOWS AND MUCH MORE you will see easily that THAT TYRANNY IS THE SAME EVERYWHERE.

http://www.eutruth.org.uk/cp.pdf

 

*

On Tuesday 14th July,2009 we are made aware of a massively accumulated bloated political class which is sucking the life-blood out of our dying economy and unless drastic measures are taken NOW! to reduce the numbers and bring their gold-plated pensions down to size there can be no meaningful  recovery for decades ,if even then. To match this extreme wasteful expence we have a situation in our island home where the greater majority of the populations of regions of the UK exist on welfare benefits and handouts from the few parts of the country which are now being terminally squeezed to death after 12 maniac years of illegal wars and turning much of the country into a Stalinist authoritarian and Big-Brother police state which has more in keeping with their recruiting local militia more reminiscent of the 30's Nazi Brownshirts as anti-neighbourly Stasi informers inimical of such methods so beloved of  NEW LABOUR.]

*

*

Much of the problems with the economy in the USA and ENGLAND have been brought about by the absence of a Gold-Standard which would prevent Governments from issuing mountains of printed currency which soon becomes worthless which is happening with the Federal Reserve bank in the US and Bank of England.

As Ron Paul in his excellent publication THE REVOLUTION-A Manifesto:

'Gold cannot be mined as cheaply as Federal Reserve notes can be printed. Nor can its supply be manipulated on a daily basis. There is a great dispersion of power in a gold-standard system. That is the strength of the system, for it allows the people to check and monetary excesses of their rulers and does not allow the rulers to exploit the people by debasing the money.'

Mr Paul further comments : 'Congress could not get away with spending beyond its means year after year if we did not have a FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ready to finance it all by purchasing bonds with money it creates out of thin air.'

[Does this not remind you all of the recent attempt of the Bank of England to off-load its bonds which failed to reach the figure required.  Don't be misled by thinking that this apparently innocuous bank is the height of probity as the history of the BANK OF ENGLAND  has and is being manipulated by the International bankers with their dream of a NEW WORLD ORDER and WORLD GOVERNMENT backed by the BRITISH MONANARCHY whose commitment to those ILLUMINATI ideals over many centuries has never wavered under the pretence of an ancient once hallowed institution which from its beginning was the bond between the warrior King and his loyal People. Such a pure and loyal Monarch was ALFRED THE GREAT

 

www.house.gov/paul

For daily details on the US Economy and political system.

 

JULY 6 -2009

 

 

 

AN ACT OF BETRAYAL BY THE QUEEN IN 2008

Our English History of Monarchy since the reign of the loyal sovereign Queen Elizabeth I who was protected by voluntary associations determined to keep HER MAJESTY safe from HER ENEMIES in 1584 which was later passed by an ACT of PARLIAMENT,  The abject Treachery of the Stuarts and of the Hanovian Monarchy of the House of Hanover descended from the  Guelfs or Welfs of BAVARIA which has resulted in their ancestor Elizabeth II  in June 2008 selling the  birthright of the 'RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN' to our past enemy of TWO WORLD WARS -the GERMAN FOURTH REICH  better known as the UNITED STATES OF EUROPE as it is now known. The BETRAYAL was completed by a degenerate blackguard   traitorous  scoundrel and  unprincipled SCOTSMAN calling himself recently an ENGLISH PRIME MINISTER and  HIS TARTAN CLAN who seem to have forgotten THEIR OWN history of what it means  from the Arbroath Manifesto sent by the Nobles and Commons of SCOTLAND to the POPE in 1320 to'...but for that freedom which no man will surrender but with his life'.  Our above symbol shows the important dates in our history of our beginning in this land of ENGLAND and of our FREEDOMS since MAGNA CARTA] 

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS by the tireless PATRIOT- the late NORRIS MCWHIRTER

A MAN OF PRINCIPLE

Another Scotsman of another generation but of firm Christian principle who in competing in the 1924 Paris Olympics refused to run on the Sabbath even though he was faced with the ardent request of the Prince of Wales (later Edward the VIII who became a close friend and confident of Adolf Hitler- See-'Britain's Nazi King -Revealed -8PM Channel 5 -Thursday,16th July,2009) and others of the Committee, but refused to go against his FAITH.  His close friend and rival on the track a Jewish student at the last moment found a way for him to compete on another day.  Eric Liddell won his race and after left to take up Missionary work in China.  Years earlier after  competing in a race successfully he gave a speech to his close followers who scrambled around him to hear him speak at the end of the event. In his brief message he compared the Christian faith as running in a race and requires concentration and will. He said that Jesus said the kingdom of God is within us and that if you collect yourself in the love of Christ... -these events were dramatically portrayed in the Film the 'Chariots of Fire'.

*

JULY16 -2009

 

 

HOW HARD WE ALL TRIED!

 

 

2003

 

 

NATIONAL CAMPAIGN

FOR

A PETITION TO THE QUEEN

 

 

 

LONDON – 5TH NOVEMBER 2003

 

THE BATTLE FOR OUR FREEDOM

HAS NOW BEGUN

 

From this moment it is for the people to decide if they wish to remain Free.  We now have it within our power to take away from politicians the means to enslave us.

 

This is a momentous event in the life of our nation, which comes only at those times during the critical life struggle of a people in defence of their rights and liberties.

 

The voice of the People supported by their Sovereign will prevail. All you have to do is sign the Petition in order to save your Freedom and Country –Don’t Delay!    God Save The Queen!

 

Constitutional Challenge by the “ Defenders of the Realm” Click Here for details on our Bulletin Board.

2003

In 2008 the greater majority of the PEOPLE did NOTHING and as a consequence the QUEEN-LORDS and COMMONS sold  THEIR CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER.

 

 

TPress black-out on launch of Petitions to the Queen

 

 

OUR QUEEN AND THE EU ECONSTITUTION

 

WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR.

 

In the Daily Mail on Friday, October 17, 2004 there appeared the following article by Simon Heffer

 

 

THE BRITISH LEGACY - AUSTRALIA -CANADA -NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER

 

 

THE ACT OF SETTLEMENT 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!

 

 

THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE LAW OF THE COMMONWEALTH AND AMERICA.

 

 

The Commonwealth Realms  V  The Constitution for Europe-Part1- PARTIV

 

 

 

MONARCHY a THEME PARK

 

 

ILLUMINATI

 

 
   
   

 

 

 

 

THE GREATEST THREAT IN 2010-12

IS

CENSORSHIP

of the

INTERNET

INTERNET FREEDOM IS OUR LAST SAFEGUARD AGAINST TYRANNY

For those who have no intention of voting for the traitorous  GANG OF THREE in WESTMINSTER

VOTE!

FOR

 A FREE INTERNET

Who will get the ball rolling  because time is of the essence?

NOW!

[You have our vote and no doubt hundreds of thousands of FREE INDEPENDENT MINDED INDIVIDUALS who put FREEDOM before POLITICS on the INTERNET.

We have ourselves have felt the censorships hand as you will see if you click the POISON AND MIND CONTROL in our selection board

POISON AND MIND CONTROL

The information is withdrawn and then reinstated... by the censorship criminals no doubt part of the

Common Purpose

Common Purpose brigade who don't like FREE SPEECH and FREE EXPRESSION because such LIBERTIES are lethal to their small evil satanic minds.
     
    THIS YOU NEED TO KNOW! - WHY DO WE DO THIS?   TO ALERT YOU! OF THE DANGERS OF FLUORIDE IN YOUR DRINKING WATER AND HOW IT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR A HOST OF DIFFERENT MEDICAL CONDITIONS -INCLUDING CANCER,BRITTLE BONE DISEASE.IMMUNE DIFICIENCY, MENTAL SEDATION, AND EVEN REDUCED IQ. THIS HAS ALL BEEN KNOWN TO THE POWERS -THAT SINCE THE 1920'S - DESPITE THE FACT THAT FLUORIDE HAS BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE NO EFFECT WHATYSOEVER IN REDUCING DENTAL PROBLEMS, THE POWER-THAT-BE INSIST ON PUTTING IT IN OUR TAP WATER>   FLUORIDE IS A TOXIC INDUSTRIAL BI-PRODUCT FROM THE ALUMINIUM INDUSTRY.  IT IS CLASSIFIED AS HAZARDOUS WASTE-    CONSUMPTION OF FLUORIDE-EVEN IN TINY AMOUNTS - IS EXTREMELY HARMFUL TO THE BODY - THIS IS AN ESTABLISHED FACT.  - ONE OF THE FIRST USES FOR FLUORIDE WAS IN THE 1930'S AND 1940'S WHEN FLUORIDATED WATER WAS GIVEN TO PRISONERS OF NAZI CONCENTRATION CAMPS TO CLOUD THEIR THINKING ABILITY AND WEAKEN THEIR MENTAL RESOLVE.  THIS IS THE SAME TACTIC IS NOW BEING USED ON US, BY OUR VERY OWN LEADERS - THOSE YOU VOTE FOR -TO THE EXTENT WHERE MANY PEOPLE ARE INCAPABLE OF THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX.  - ALL THE STUDIES IN EVERY STATE AND COUNTRY SHOW THAT FLUORIDE DOES NOT IMPROVE THE STATE OF YOUR TEETH OR GUMS.  AND EVEN IF IT DID HELP IN ANY WAY, WHY DOES THIS HIGHLY TOXIC SUBSTANCE HAVE TO BE PUT IN OUR DRINKING WATER?  THINK ABOUT IT.  -THERE'S ONLY ONE LOGICAL REASON TO PUT IT INTO OUR WATER THE ELITE ARE USING FLURIDE AS ONE OF THEIR MANY TOOLS TO ASSAULT OUR BODY AND MIND FOR THEIR OWN GAIN. - WE ARE NOTHING MORE THAN BATTERY CELLS TO THEM.  WE ARE JUST PROGRAMMABLE, INCOME GENERATING,TAX-PAYING CONSUMERS.   - THEY EXTRACT MONEY FROM OUR LABOUR, OUR SWEAT-EQUITY,AND THEY USE THAT MONEY TO BUILD PRISON WEALLS AROUND US SO THEY CAN CONTROL US EVEN MORE.  IF THEY HAD THEIR WAY,WE'D ALL BE NOTHING MORE THAN ROBOTS WHO DO AS WE'RE TOLD AND NEVER COMPLAIN.  THE LAST THING THEY WANT IS AN INFORMED,ACTIVE AND CLOSLY -KNIT SOCIETY OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE BRAINS -THE HEART-THE COURAGE AND THE WILL TO CHANGE THE STATUS QUO>  THEREFORE,THEY USE EVERY TOOL AT THEIR DISPOSAL TO KEEP US ALL IN A PERPETUAL DUMPED_DOWN                                                                                                                                                                                                                         T                                                                R                                                                                           WATCH ALEX JONES OF PRISON PLANET.COM - -THE FREEDOM LOBBY IN THE USA. - IT COULD SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -YOUR LIVELIHOOD AND EVEN YOUR LIFE! - JUST FOR ONCE MAKE TIME TO SEE POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO THAT YOU WILL EVER WATCH IN YOUR LIFE! - THE ISSUES ARE MOMENTOUS AND AFFECT EVERY ONE ON OUR PLANET. - MUCH YOU WILL LEARN WILL ASTOUND YOU AND SURPRISE YOU WHEN YOU HEAR HOW THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WHO HAVE BEEN PLANNING THEIR FINANCIAL COUP FOR OVER TWO CENTURIES AND A HALF TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH AN ELITE! OLIGARTHY IN A WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE WORLD'S WEALTHIEST ABD MOST POWERFUL AND LATER TO DISPOSE OF AT LEAST 85% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION. - THESE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ARE PRAYING TO SATAN TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM YOU! - TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - IN FACT YOU HAVE JUST TWO YEARS TO RALLY YOUR NEIGHBOURS TO THE TRUTH AS AN INSIDER HAS STATED THAT THE ELITE HAVE THEIR OWN ETHICS WHICH IS TO USE THEIR HOLLYWOOD EMPIRE TO PUT OUT WAR FILMS OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS SHOWING HOW THEY INTEND THEIR PURPOSE -  SO YOU HAVE THAT LONG! TO SAVE YOURSELF! - YOUR FAMILY! -YOUR FRIENDS! AND ALL FELLOW BEINGS ON OUR PLANET FROM THE SATANIC OLIGARTHY WHO WISH TO RULE THE WORLD THEIR WAY!- THE VIDEO WILL DETAIL IN ITS 2 HOUR VIDEO PRESENTATION 'THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC'. - IF YOU TURN YOUR FACE AWAY NOW!.-.YOU WILL SUFFER FOR IT!.- WE ARE CONVINCED THAT MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY ARE UNAWARE OF WHAT IS HAPPENNING TO THEIR COUNTRY - NATURALLY THEY ARE LOOKING TO SURVIVE IN ONE OF THE WORST RECESSIONS IN LIVING MEMORY OR HISTORY WNICH HAS BEEN ENGINEERED BY THE ILLUMINATI WHICH INCLUDES THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE - THE MAIN MONEY LENDERS IN THE WORLD SINCE THEIR 18TH CENTURY AND LATER INTRIGUES IN BAVARIA IN THE 19TH CENTURY AND HAVE SUPPORTED BOTH SIDES OF MAJOR WARS AND NO DOUBT SMALLER WARS IN ORDER TO INCREASE THEIR WEALTH AND POWER.- THEIR MAJOR TRIUMPH WAS TO GET THE UNITED NATIONS OFF THE GROUND AFTER WORLD WAR II BY ROCKEFELLER WHO OWNED THE LAND WHICH HE OFFERED IN ORDER THAT THE UN BUILDING COULD BE BUILT IN NEW YORK - SINCE THEN ALL UN ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN PART OF THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION WHICH ENGINNERED A PANDEMIC WHEN THE PREVIOUS CRITERA HAD NOT BEEN REACHED AND WORLD MONETARY FUND AND THE ELITE WHICH IS MADE UP OF OVER 6000 OF THE RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD WHO TO ASSIST THEM HAVE THEIR SERVANTS IN POLITICS - ACADEMICS -PRESS AND MEDIA AND FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE  - THE BILDERBERGERS IN ALL YOUR MAIN POLITIOCAL PARTIES TO DO THEIR BIDDING - SUCH AS GORDON BROWN - ED BALLS - PETER MANDELSON - DAVID MILIBAND AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR AND IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY  KENNETH CLARKE - GEORGE OSBORNE - WILLIAM HAGUE -http://www.bilderberg.org/Bilderberg2009. WILLIAM HAGUE - DOUGLAS HURD - AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND NOT FORGETTING THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WITH PADDY ASHDOWN AND OTHERS WHO BY THEIR COMPLICITY INTEND BY VARIOUS MEANS - WAR - TOXIC VACCINES [MERCURY}- POVERTY (DESTRUCTION OF INDUSTRY -CAP AND TRADE) - POLLUTED WATER SUPPLIES- {FLUORIDE A POISON AND OTHER POLLUTANTS - TOXIC AIR SPRAYING AND DETENTION AS IN AMERICA WHERE THERE ARE NOW DETENTION CENTRES OR TO BE MORE PRECISE CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN MANY STATES ACROSS AMERICA IT IS OBVIOUS THE MAN IN THE STREET IS UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE DISASTER AWAITING THEM!  - IN OUR SMALL WAY WE AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR MANY YEARS AS ALEX JONES -PRISON PLANET >COM AND INFOWARS>COM AND MANY OTHER BRAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHEN THEY DISAPEAR FROM SIGHT - YOU WILL TRULY DOOMED TO SLAVERY OR DEATH.- IN OUR OWN ONE MAN CAMPAIGN 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' WE HAVE WITNESSED THE TOTAL IGORANCE OF THE PUBLIC TO WHAT IS IN STORE FOR THEM!  - AT LEAST WE WILL KNOW WHY! - BUT MILLIONS WILL BE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER AS SHEEP AND IT WILL ONLY DAWN ON SOME THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN NOTICE WHEN THEY COULD AND MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE FREE PEOPLE'S OF OUR WORLD! WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED BY OUR PARLIAMENT AND MONARCH - YOU ARE ONLY MONTH'S AWAY FROM LOSING YOUR ANCIENT FREEDOMS - YOUR UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY OF OVER 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING! - UNLESS YOU STIR YOURSELVES!          THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 COULD BE THE LAST! - AS LISBON TREATY SAYS SO! - AS REGIONS/PROVINCES WILL BE THE ORDER OF THE DAY - REMEMBER WHETHER YOU VOTE NEW LABOUR - CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS YOU HAVE AGREED TO LOSE YOUR INHERITED SACRED 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN' - WHICH SHOULD BE PASSED ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS -  BECAUSE THEY WOULD RATHER 'SELLETH HIS BIRTHRIGHT FOR A MESS OF POTTAGE'                           MAIN ISSUES BULLETIN-UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                           EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                           WHEN THE LISBON TREATY IS RATIFIED BY ALL!     YOUR PENALTY WILL BE SLAVERY! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU! - ON DECEMBER 1-2009 THE TREATY CAME INTO BEING AND ENGLAND DISAPPEARED FROM HISTORY AND EVEN FROM THE MAP OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE AND LOST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL IN THE BAD BARGAIN! - THANKS TO SCOTSMAN GORDON BROWN WHO WITH HIS TARTAN CLAN HAS CERTAINLY TAKEN REVENGE FOR PAST TIMES!               Click           Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the           1999 European Elections.               Click           Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                 LINKS FROM BULLETIN FILE TO OTHER FILES!    nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ONLY MILLIONS ON THE STREETS CAN NOW SAVE US NOW! - BUT THERE IS NO LEADER OF FREEDOM TO COMPARE WITH OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL - TO RALLY THE PEOPLE! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!     OVER 1'600 BULLETIN'S! AVAILABLE HERE!  
     

http://www.lovethetruth.com/

truth_about_fluoride.htm

*

DECEMBER 1-2011

Brought forward from December,2009.

 

 
 

Gilad Atzmon - This is How Israel Runs the British Press

'The following is a glimpse into the Israeli Hasbara's/Mossad's/Sayanim's operation in the UK. It explains how Israel and its agents manage to dominate news coverage in Britain and beyond. It seems from the following leaked email as if BICOM (British Israel Communication & research Centre) runs the News desk for the BBC, Sky and the FT. I guess that last week the Guardian also joined the party. It is now an offical Israeli propaganda outlet.

Shockingly enough, not a single British paper was brave enough to report the story or publish the leaked email. Surely they know who their masters are. The message is pretty clear. British press is not trustworthy. It is as Zionised as our political system.'

Read more: Gilad Atzmon - This is How Israel Runs the British Press

[There is a well-known phrase:

'People's are not evil ONLY individuals are evil.'

We have no hatred for the Israeli people  of whom many of them at home and abroad in the USA and around the world hate ZIONISM and its brutal and destructive agenda. It thrives on WAR and EXPLOITATION and they are pushing ahead for a WAR against IRAN.

Unfortunately for the English people their traitorous PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON and many others in WESTMINSTER and in the country are the very SERVANTS of that hateful dogma which is leading towards a ONE-WORLD CORPORATISM/GOVERNMENT which apart from an ELITE and SLAVES there will be no place on PLANET EARTH for the majority of MANKIND.   As we have already mentioned about the SURPRISE ATTACK by ATTACK HELICOPTERS accompanied by a POLICE HELICOPTER on our property during the recent  PARLIAMENTARY RECESS.   WE understand that the FOREIGN Minister and

BILDERBERGER

William Hague is responsible for the Security Service MI6 and GCHQ -  possibly he could explain why the intrusive and noisy operation took place above a quiet country village at NOON on a Sunday.    Now we know why we received those visitors possibly from a USA BASE in the UK.  The WAR in LIBYA was but a stepping stone to the remaining non-ROTHCHILD CENTRAL BANKS countries who will fall in the very near future.       We have been WARNING for a few years for you to NOT!  vote for  the BILDERBERGERS the SERVANTS of the ILLUMINATI/ZIONISM who CONTROL the GOVERNMENT and so-called OPPOSITION parties at WESTMINSTER and  have no love for NATION STATES particularly those such as ENGLAND who still has some FREEDOM but that is now under THREAT as witnessed by the introduction of the CONTINENTAL SYSTEM of Corpus Juris into our

JewsnotZionists

 

[This link is no longer available possibly it was too honest about the Zionist element within  JEWRY.]

 

*

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-/

David-Cameron-doesnt-understand-Conservative-party.

[Well we are sure the majority of the population must feel the same way.  NO SUBSTANCE!-NO CONSERVATIVE and certainly NO STATESMAN , and apart from a few politicians deserving such a term over the past 100 years the pick since the Second World War brings us but a few which are too obvious for us to note . We have to look to the Victorian Age to compare how so much that is now wrong with our society:

'Between 1871 and 1875 our birth-rate reached its highest point, round about 35 per thousand, and the United Kingdom population, which had been 27 million in 1851, rose in the next thirty years to nearly 35 millions.   In much the same period they invested over £1000 million overseas, while 2.[5] million British subjects migrated to the British Colonies and the United States.   The tonnage cleared in our ports grew from less than 15 millions to nearly 60 , almost one-third of the world's sea-going ships were British.   In 1850 exports were valued at £197millions but at £297 millions in 1874, imports rising even more from £100 millions to £370 millions , while at the last date the total foreign trade of Britain and her Colonies equalled that of France, Germany, Italy, and the United States all rolled together.   Except for the Crimea, ,the country was engaged in no major war .  Much that had been tentative  in the Empire of 1850 was made solid; Canada was confederated, Australian self-government determined, in India the mutiny was suppressed and government transferred to the Crown.   Memorable things were done for the life  of the mother State.   Universities were opened and reformed, the modern civil service created, education made universal, the parliamentary electorate doubled, the courts of law modenized, trade unions given their full status, and the position of women revolutionized.  As for the achievements of the spirit, in the years between Wordsworth death in 1850 and Carlyle's in 1881, a  great body of immortal British literature and thought was made:  by Tennyson, Browning, and Ruskin; Dickens, Thackery , and George Elliot; Newman and Mathew Arnold;  Macauly,  Mill, and T. H .Green, Darwin, Huxley , and Tyndall; Bagehot, Henry Maine, and Herbert Spencer; J. R .Green, [Lord} Acton and Froude; Meridith, Thomas Hardy, and William Morris; Westcott, Lightfoot, and Martineau; Clerk Maxwell and F.H.Bradley.'

-A HISTORY OF ENGLAND-by Keith Feiling-1948

[As many more people are now aware that since the 50's secret meetings of the BILDERBERGERS in the BILDERBERGER HOTEL in the Netherlands began with the aim of the destruction of the nation state to be replaced by a ONE-WORLD/CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT. It is no coincidence that the main-players on the political scene in England are these same traitors who meet in secret to discuss their satanic plans while attempting to be representatives of the people [BILDERBERGERS]. As we have mentioned so many times how can these same individuals serve two masters-either the PEOPLE or the ILLUMINATI not BOTH.  But as shown above the PRESS and MEDIA in the main refuse to highlight this destructive subversive and traitorous element in our PARLIAMENT and the population at large appears not to be interested that their country is now ruled by a FOREIGN POWER.]

CLICKStartpage

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

real-tough-men-in-america-and-israel-are-against

-an-attack-on-iran.

 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

mossad-attacks-iran-top-revolutionary-guard

-is-dead-iran-regime-spins-act-of-war-as-an-accident.

NOVEMBER-2011

 

 

The words 'Jewish' and 'Zionism' are interchangeable? NO WAY

Share

Jewish Rabbi Exposes Zionist Israel

----------------------------------------------

 

Rabbi Feldman Says Zionism is Illegitimate Political Movement

 
 
 
 

 

Friends, Britons, Conservatives-

Lend us your vote!

 

MICHAEL MCGOUGH argues that conservatives should vote

 UKIP

 

 in the Euro-elections.

[AFTER THE EXCELLENT RESULTS IN THE EURO ELECTION IN MAY 2014 IT IS VITAL THAT THIS LAST CHANCE TO OBTAIN OUR HISTORICAL FREEDOM MUST EXTEND TO THE GENERAL ELECTION IN MAY-2015.]

 

I AM a conservative, [-ditto-] I vote for conservative policies but I have for so long been let down by the Conservative Party which has been compliant as we have been drawn into ever closer union with our fellow European Union member states, treaty by treaty.  we have only once been given our say on EU membership and that was by a Labour Government in 1975.[WITH GROSS LIES AND DECEIT.] is it right that the generations unable to vote then are constrained by that ancient vote, which only referred to an economic arrangement?

For some time now, in anticipation of the next General Election delivering change to a Conservative administration, the media ( Financial Times, Spectator and Andrew Marr for example)   have been sponsoring the idea that David Cameron is a hardened Eurosceptic[REMEMBER! this article was written in the  Winter of 2008/9]

BUT IS HE?

Past evidence would indicate a short period of tenure if that were so. 

WE MUST NOT FORGET

how Lady Thatcher was removed subsequent to her Bruges Speech, nor Iain Duncan Smith after his in Prague.  Discarding the previous robust party policy of repatriation of fishing rights, appointing a Europhile head of candidate selection and remaining in the federalist European People's party despite promising

NOT TO DO SO

does little to confirm him as

"one of us"

for I am certain that TFA Members of all parties are confirmed Eurosceptics.  Cameron says that he will definitely leave the EPP after the 2009 European Elections, finally delivering on his leadership election promise  However Miro Topolanek, the Czech prime Minister, Cameron's partner in forming his proposed post-EEP grouping in the European Parliament is"committed" to ratifying the

LISBON TREATY

hardly an ideal partner to roll back the EU. As soon as the Conservative MEPs had elected a new leader, the Europhile Timothy Kirkhope, Charles Tannock suggested on Conservative Home , that they should stay in the EPP, for reasons of status.

WHAT OF SHADOW FOREIGN SECRETARY WILLIAM HAGUE?[BILDERBERGER]

I recall his commitment to opposition to the Euro was limited to the life of one parliament.  With the Pound collapsing towards parity with the Euro and the current "beneficial" economic and financial crisis, demands for us to adopt the currency of the

EUROPEAN SUPERSTATE

will come again harder to oppose post ratification of the LISBON -Treaty which requires it.  We have an OPT-OUT, but nothing is forever.

Speaking at the Freedom in the City talk Professor Haseler of the Federal trust confirmed that the EUROPHILES would push for THIS and Roland Rudd , Chairman of Britain for a New Europe had an article calling for this on the Evening Standard website (15.11.08) followed by Will Hutton in the Observer (16.11.08)

A major plank of the Conservative's European manifesto will be apparent strident opposition to the LISBON TREATY and  a commitment to hold a further referendum , post a GENERAL ELECTION.

This played well until David Cameron made his "Harrow Declaration" diluting his initial commitment. Policy is now:

We will be sold the familiar, but sad old tale of unceasing efforts to renegotiate our position in the EU, so much easier from within.

[Balderdash!-Fiddle-Faddle!]

" So if the Lisbon Treaty is not yet in force at the time of the next General Election

 [No fear of that as the supposed reluctant Scot Gordon Brown signed the

TREATY OF TREASON

 and in the words of our greatest English poet

 

'The man was noble; but with his last attempt he wiped it out; betrayed his country; and his name remains to the ensuing age abhorred.' 

  William Shakespeare

 

and a Conservative Government is elected we would put the Treaty to a referendum of the British people, recommending a "no" vote

 [Well! in 2013 we are told by David Cameron that he would fight to remain in a reformed EU so there was never any truth in the above statement.  The man has been proved a serial liar and traitor to his country and not to be trusted under any circumstances.]

If the British people rejected the Treaty, we would withdraw Britain's ratification of it. But if the treaty is in force we will be in a different situation. In our view, then, political integration would have gone too far and the Treaty would lack democratic legitimacy in this country and we would not let matters rest  there."

What does " we would not let matter rest there " mean?  We will be sold the familiar, but sad old tale of unceasing efforts to negotiate our position in the EU, so mush easier from within.  Nigel Farage, at the Bruges Group meeting in Birmingham, recalled a cartoon of a fish within a fishing net telling another outside

" it is much easier to negotiate from within"

If Cameron was really opposed to LISBON he would kill it dead

NOW!

by offering a referendum, come what may, without qualification.

[A reminder this article was written in the Winter of 2008/9

If LISBON is no good before ratification it cannot be good after.  If, because of treaty law, a NO vote in such a referendum meant we would have to leave the EU then so be it.  We woul;d, as the Freedom Association's own campaign states, be

"BETTER OFF OUT OF THE EU"

anyway.

Where are the Conservatives crying out about yet another year of unsatisfactory

EU ACCOUNTS

[Not been passed for over 18 years]

With losses of 2p in the £1 being seemed  acceptable by the auditors with actual losses being greater such as 11p in the £1 for structural funds (6 billion Euros) one would expect a Shadow chancellor to be outraged, not pussyfooting around the margins of employment taxes.

There will be no referendum, but there will be an early opportunity for all those opposed to LISBON and everything else that is wrong with our membership of the EU clearly to highlighting this. Voting for the

UKIP

on 4 June -2009

[Certainly in May 2014]

and securing yet more UKIP MEPS will send a message to the EU, the Government, and most importantly, David Cameron, that we seek change.

LEND US YOUR VOTE AND CHANGE YOUR COUNTRY-PUT COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY.  

 am certain that David Cameron would then be forced to CHANGE and PROMISE us the POLICIES the MAJORITY DEMAND.

[HE DIDN'T IN 2009]

If he does that , I envisage that all conservatives shall once again be able to vote together at a general election.

Michael Mc Gough.

michael.mcgough@lineone.net

[An excellent article which we decided to give much prominence because of the importance of the subject particularly as it is a LAST WARNING to those who LOVE THEIR FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY to understand that this is not about PARTY but about COUNTRY and by now you must surely realise that the GANG OF THREE in WESTMINSTER are FELLOW TRAVELLERS of the COLLECTIVIST SOVIETISED GODLESS UNDEMOCRATIC EUROPEAN UNION.

 

VOTE!

 

UKIP

 

FOR THE RETURN OF YOUR ONCE
FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

TO

CONTROL IMMIGRATION

AND

HAVE THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD OUR TRADING PARTNERS

AND

SECURITY AND SPACE IN OUR ISLAND HOME

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER   -2013

 

 

 

 

A MATTER OF HISTORY!

No 1

 

No

2

 
No

 3

 

No

4

 

No

 5

 

No

6

 

No

7

 

No

8

 

No

9

 

No

10

 

[WHERE WOULD WE BE WITHOUT THE INTERNET TO ADVANCE OUR KNOWLEDGE OF WHO RULES OUR COUNTRY AND WORLD.  BUT CHANGE IS HAPPENING BEFORE OUR EYES AS OUR MASTERS FOR OVER 300 YEARS WITH LINKS TO THE FAR PAST ARE NOW ON THE DEFENSIVE BECAUSE THE PEOPLE WILL TAKE THEIR DICTATORSHIP RULE NO LONGER. FOR THE LATEST INFORMATION GO TO :BENJAMIN.

H F-SP3

 

 
WE THANK THE MILLIONS OF VISITORS TO OUR WEBSITE OVER THE PAST DECADE.  THERE HAS BEEN AN AWAKING OF THE PATRIOT ENGLISH TO THE PERIL THEY FACE TO THEIR IDENTITY , FREEDOM AND LOSS OF COUNTRY. 

 

TOP TOPIC and latest STATS

APRIL 2009 - MARCH  2010
VISITORS  PAGES VIEWED   HITS
230,032 445,813  696,806[E]
APL-JUN -2010

69,395

 APL-JUN -2010

125,201

 APL-JUN -2010

208,185    

A MEETING PLACE

OF

FREEDOM FIGHTERS FOR A FREE PEOPLE AND A FREE WORLD

DEFENDERS DESTROYERS

 

ILLUMINATI
realzionistnews.

 

NEW WORLD ORDER
JewsnotZionist

 

BILDERBERGER

DAVID ICKE- WORLD TOUR FROM JULY 2011

 

INTER-ALFA BANKS

JEW WATCH

CENTRAL BANKS
 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH

[NEW LINK-TUESDAY 6TH SEPTEMBER,2011]

UK COLUMN.ORG.

 

BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

CONSPIRACYPLANET.COM/
 

 

SEE OUR  MORE EXTENSIVE

MULTI -VIEW  & OVER 1600 BULLETINS & HUNDREDS OF EUROSCEPTIC AND OTHER LINKS.

 

 CLICK BELOW FOR A SELECTION OF PAST MONTHLY INDEX FILES
     
     
PART 2-NOVEMBER-2011    

PART 2-OCT-2011

PART 1 -JULY-2010  
PART 1-SEPT-2011 Page 1-JUNE-2010  
PART 2-AUGUST-2011 PART 1 -MAY-2010  
PART 2-JULY-2011 MAY-ELECTION  
PART 2-JUNE-2011 PART 2-APRIL 2010  
PART 2-MAY-2011 PART 1-MARCH-2010  
PART 2-APRIL-2011 PART1- FEB -2010  
PART 2-MARCH-2011 PART 1-JAN-2010  
PART  2 -FEB -2011 PART-1--DEC-200  

PART 2-JAN 2011

JAN-09 to MAY-09 FEBRUARY-2007

PART 1-DEC-2010

   
PART 1- NOV-2010    
PART1- OCT-2010- TO BE CONTINUED  
PART 1- SEPT2010   PRE-JUNE-2007
PART 1-AUG-2010    
PART 1-JULY-2010   Archive

 

*

 

A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

JEWSNOT ZIONISTST DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

NADER LIBRARY.COM-

TERRORISM-ILLUMINATI

 

DIVINE COSMOS.COM    GLOBALRESEARCH.CA

 

WHISTLEBLOWER.ORG

 

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 U.S. Concentration Camps  FEMA Protocols

of

ZION

NWO  Dr.

John

Coleman

WHO OWNS

THE FED

 

POWER OF 1)HAARP FOR GOOD   2)EVIL Mind Control Henry Makow 1)Chemtrails

2)CREATED

 

PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS War

is a Racket

Established

1994

About Us Election Results 1000's

of Links

HOME-FULL VERSION

 

Archive Short Cut

MAJOR ISSUES

 

Topics

and Stats

 

Party Policies
 
IMPORTANT NOTICE:

AS WITH ALL OUR MONTHLY BULLETINS -OVER 2000 SINCE 2003 -YOU WILL FIND INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHLY BULLETINS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.

[WITH A GENERAL ELECTION IN MAY 2015 ESSENTIAL MONTHLY INFORMATION WILL BE RETAINED

FURTHER INFO 

WILL APPEAR SHORTLY IN

PT2/ 3/4/5/6

WE ARE INCREASING EACH MONTH'S BULLETINS TO 6 PARTS IN ORDER TO SHOW MORE INFORMATION ON THE EU.

work in progress

 

*

 

 
Ten EU truths we must tell the public

No 4

4. The EU is illegal under British law. Four Prime Ministers and the Queen have committed five acts of Treason by signing five EU treaties which will abolish our nation and replace it with the EU; they[Tony Bliar] had to secretly repeal two of the laws of
treason in the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act (s36.3) to escape prosecution.

 

http://eutruth.org.uk

TREASON

 

H F-SP 26

 

 

 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ne

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

ws/article-2706589/Find-reason-war-Germany-Shocking-letter-documents-King-George-V-urged-foreign-

H F-SP35

 

 

 
T Coronation oath
 

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken her coronation oath, by signing these five treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major and Tony Blair.

Realising they stood a good chance of spending the rest of their lives behind bars, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998 (s36.3), which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the five treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her she might have lost her crown (not her life or a limb), and kept her £9 billion plus palaces. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she's dead keen to sign; she's already said she'll sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can then never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a higher and darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI must be turning over in his grave. http://eutruth.org.uk

*

Possibly the answer lies HERE:

SACRED OATH

*

TREASON

 

H F-SP40

 

JUNE-2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Established 1994-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-Top Topics and Stats

Established 1994-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-Top Topics and Stats