ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG UK .

FREEDOM-UNITY.

 
BREXIT

ANNOUNCEMENT

ARTICLE 50 LETTER

DELIVERED BY

'HER MAJESTY'S AMBASSADOR

TO

BRUSSELS

ON

MARCH 29-2017

*

ON

THE FINAL STRETCH

 TO

 FREEDOM

OF THE

PEOPLE AND NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

[TIME ELAPSED SINCE REFERENDUM IN JUNE-2016

  9 MONTHS

 

 MAR-2017- AUG-2019 (?)

 

MARCH 23-2017.

 

 

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 
Searches related to DAILY MAIL-NEWS -ON ISLAMIC TAKEOVER OF

 ENGLAND

-GOVERNMENT NOT CONCERNED?

daily mail immigration headlines

latest migrant news in sweden

daily mail immigration lies

greece migrant news

daily mail immigration article

migration newspaper article

immigration articles uk

france migrant news

WE WILL SOON HAVE OUR COUNTRY BACK FROM BERLIN BUT WE WILL NOT HAVE IT IN ANOTHER 45 YEARS UNLESS THE GOVERNMENT TAKES DRASTIC ACTION REPEATEDLY CALLED FOR BY MODERATE MUSLIM CLERICS FOR YEARS BUT WITHOUT ADEQUATE RESPONSE. IN CONTRAST TO THOSE CALLING FOR AN ISLAMIC STATE THE GOVERNMENT ARE BABES-IN-ARMS!

HAMPERED BY AN EU SO-CALLED HUMAN RIGHTS ACT WHICH IS NEITHER HUMAN OR RIGHT BEING THE TERRORISTS AND CRIMINALS BEST FRIEND.

FOR OUR SECURITY AND SAFETY WE NEED AN ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS ACT  WHICH IS BOTH HUMAN AND RIGHT FOR THE SETTLED POPULATION OF OUR ISLAND HOME THAN CONTINUE WITH THAT EU VERSION WHICH IS DANGEROUS AND NOT WANTED OVER HERE!

PROMISES HAVE BEEN MADE FOR

'AN ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

NOT THE INHUMAN AND TERRORISTS AND CRIMINALS CHARTER.'
 

 

THE SO-CALLED EU HUMAN RIGHTS ACT CLAIMED

ITS

INNOCENT VICTIMS ON

WESTMINSTER BRIDGE

AND IN THE

GROUNDS

 OF

PARLIAMENT.

 

 

MARCH 2017

 

*

 DAILY MAIL

 

 

[GRIM REALITY! NOT A SOAP!]

Smug, craven politicians in thrall to notions of diversity, sowed the seeds of the terror we're now reaping, writes

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN

 

THE glowing tributes paid to protection officer PC Keith Palmer were thoroughly deserved. He was the best of British, a man with a selfless sense of duty who served in the Royal Artillery before joining the police.

Constable Palmer who was unarmed, was stabbed to death fending off a crazed jihadist attacker attempting to enter the Houses of Parliament, MPs queued up to honour his bravery and sacrifice. Politicians love to associate themselves with courage of our men and women in uniform.

But, at risk of being accused of cynicism, I couldn't help wondering about the reaction had PC Palmer been a firearms officer who shot dead a knifeman on the streets of London. On past form he'd have been lucky not to end up in the dock at the Old Bailey charged with

MURDER.

Worse, if during his Army days he'd been falsely accused by some crooked solicitor such as Phil Shyster of committing

WAR CRIMES

in Afghanistan, Iraq or Northern Ireland.

his life would have been turned upside down by the historic investigations team and he could now be

ROTTING IN A MILITARY JAIL.

IN either event, the same politicians singing his posthumous praises this week would have washed their hands of

HIM.

Sorry if all this sounds a tad sour, but I found some of the self-congratulatory posturing in the Commons yesterday faintly nauseating. While paying lip service to the

EMERGENCY SERVICES

and their

PARLIAMENTARY STAFF,

It  struck me that what many MPs- with a few honourable exceptions-

WERE REALLY CELEBRATING WAS THEIR OWN PERCEIVED HEROISM.

The real heroes

were on

WESTMINSTER BRIDGE

and in

NEW PALACE YARD

TRYING TO SAVE LIVES.

They weren't cowering in the secure confines of the

COMMONS CHAMBER

Tweeting.

Although this attack has been pained, with justification, as an assault on the

MOTHER OF PARLIAMENTS,

their was never any danger to a single MP inside its walls.

PC Palmer and the plain clothes officer who shot dead the attacker

MADE SURE OF THAT.

Just to be on the safe side, though, the first thing the parliamentary  authorities did yesterday was to order another lorry load of concrete barriers to add to the already formidable security measures surrounding the Palace of Westminster

Not that they'd have been any good to those

INNOCENTS

who were

MURDERED

or catastrophically injured on the

BRIDGE

But at least

 DEMOCRACY will be SAFE...

Every time there is  a terrorist atrocity, either here or abroad, the politicians go through the same old motions, mouthing platitudes about never surrendering to evil.

 BUT  BY THEIR ACTIONS

they

BETRAY

their

HOLLOW RHETORIC

and the

REST OF US HAVE TO LIVE WITH THE CONSEQUENCES

It is the political class who have fostered the conditions which allow

ISLAMIST FUNDAMENTALISM TO FLOURISH IN BRITAIN

They encouraged the pernicious doctrine of

'MULTICULTURALISM'

-which is just a fancy word for

APARTHEID

and has created vast, monocultural Muslim

GHETTOES

in

OUR GREAT CITIES...

ONE-TENTH of all convicted jihadis come from a single.

small area of

 

BIRMINGHAM

 

The politicians have opened the floodgates to mass immigration without insisting on integration.

They pretend every culture, no matter how medieval and barbaric, is worthy of equal respect. They

permitted foreign hate preachers from cruel theocracies to set up shop here, peddling their doctrine

of violence and divisioIn pursuit of votes, they are in thrall to self-appointed 'community leaders' who

take our money but reject our freedoms. As a result, it is possible to spend your entire life here

without ever subscribing to one of our traditional values, such as tolerance of those with different

religious beliefs.

Many young Muslims grow up hating the

 

COUNTRY THAT GAVE THEM

 

 EVERYTHING ...

Over the past couple of decades, politicians have turned Britain [but particularly ENGLAND] into a SAFE HAVEN for TERRORISTS from ALL OVER THE WORLD thanks to Tony Blair's DISASTROUS yuman rites act, which he once described as his PROUDEST ACHIEVEMENT in POLITICS.

They LAVISH WELFARE BENEFITS on the SCUM of the EARTH and REFUSE to DEPORT THEM even when they are CONVICTED of SERIOUS OFFENCES or quite clearly

HELL BENT ON DOING US HARM.

Hundreds, perhaps thousands of young men and women born and bred in this country have travelled to SYRIA to join IZAL.

But rather than strip them of their UK citizenship and their passports, they are allowed to slip back into Britain, where all the evidence points to many of them planning acts of terror on our streets.

'Whatever happened to the concept of treason?'

AS a result, it's no longer safe to walk over a bridge in our capital city without running the risk of being mown down by an Islamist terrorist in a rented Hyundai

[THERE NEEDS TO SURFACE ANOTHER POLITICAL PARTY WHICH WILL TACKLE THE TREASON FULL ON  -  NO POLITICAL CORRECTNESS-NO EXCUSES-BUT THE SO-CALLED HUMAN RIGHTS ACT MUST GO! -THIS MADNESS COULD HAVE BEEN STOPPED YEARS AGO BUT THE ENGLISH IN THE MAIN HAD THEIR THOUGHTS  ELSEWERE.]

 

Security ' sources' regularly say there are some 3,000 active would-be jihadists living here. Of course we accept that it is absurd to paint all Muslims as TERRORISTS.

   But those terrorists who want to carry out mass slaughter on the streets of Britain [ENGLAND] all subscribe to extreme form of ISLAM , which has no place here but is common place in some parts of the world.

The authorities, however, want to PRETEND TERRORISM IS NOTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM , in any SHAPE or FORM.

SCOTLAND YARD'S ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MARK ROWLEY COULDN'T BRING HIMSELF TO USE THE WORD

saying only that the Westminster attacker was inspired by 'international terrorism'

 What would that be then-the Baader-Meinhof gang?

Columbia's FARC GUERILLAS?

This kind of pusillanimous approach is one of the reasons

DONALD TRUMP triumphed in AMERICA if you

REFUSE to CALL IT WHAT IT IS -

 

RADICAL ISLAMIST TERRORISM.

 

Shamefully, some politicians on the Left attempted to link the Westminster attack to the tragic murder of Labour MP Jo Cox last summer and draw some kind of moral equivalence.

She was killed by a deranged Right-wing fantasist, acting alone. The difference is that he set out specifically to murder Miss Cox. Islamist jihadis want to randomly kill anyone. As many as possible. Believers or non-believers. They’re not fussy.

The Westminster killer may have been flying solo, but he is part of a global terror movement which aims to destroy the West and anyone who doesn’t subscribe to their particular strain of Islam.

You may have noticed I haven’t wasted too much ink thus far on the murderer himself. That’s because I don’t want to glorify him. He was born in Britain, lived in Birmingham and was aged 52.

So that gives the lie to the ‘impressionable young man radicalised over the internet’ myth.

Almost inevitably, he had been on the radar, according to the Prime Minister. He had a long criminal record, had been investigated ‘historically’ but was now considered to be on the ‘periphery’.

Maybe if the Old Bill had spent less time chasing ‘historic’ sex offenders, they might have been able to discover that he wasn’t that peripheral after all.

Not that I blame the anti-terror services. They’re overstretched, trying to clean up the mess created by politicians. They’re doing a fantastic job in the circumstances and have foiled an impressive number of plots.

Just as well. Given that the latest perpetrator was well into his sixth decade, it suggests we are now looking at two, maybe even three, generations of home-grown jihadis.

Before the internet took off, terrorists were recruited through mosques. Scotland Yard even closed roads around Finsbury Park mosque so that Captain Hook could peddle his poison.

In the Nineties, the political class took the view that provided the Islamists didn’t commit any acts of terror on British soil, they were welcome to operate with impunity. All that achieved was to allow the merchants of death to establish deep roots here, with utterly predictable consequences.

Smug, craven politicians, in thrall to notions of ‘diversity’ and multiculturalism, sowed the seeds of the terrorism we are now reaping.

This week, innocent bystanders and tourists on Westminster Bridge, along with brave PC Keith Palmer, paid the ultimate price, while heavily protected MPs — fresh from their glowing tributes to another evil terrorist, Martin McGuinness — congratulated themselves on their own bravery and resolve.

Makes you proud to be British

 

Full article

 

*  *  *

 

[IN the1975 Referendum we were not taken in by the LIES and DECEIT of No 10 and voted

NO!

as we have always believed  that ENGLAND should always remain a FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE and have persisted in this view to the present day and beyond. In 1994 after belonging  to a number of Freedom Organizations we decided to enter the political arena and stood for election in the General Election of 1997 and in the European Election in 1999.  It is our view that the FUNDAMENTALS of our CONSTITUTION should be entrenched within our existing constitutional framework to PREVENT any further traitors from departing from the SPIRIT of TRUE CONSTITUTION which PROTECTS those ENGLISH FREEDOMS which are the TRUE INHERITANCE of FUTURE GENERATIONS. IT IS A SACRED COMPACT between the PAST and PRESENT and FUTURE.]

*

...We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

 

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2

 

'Whatever happened to the concept of treason?'

 

[Much -much more in

Full Article

*

TREASON

'Treason doth never prosper; for if it prosper, none dare call it treason.'-

Sir J. Harrington. (1561-1612) Eng. poet.

*

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence.'-

Edmund Burke.

*

'Where trust is greatest, there treason is in its most horrid shape.'-

DRYDEN

 

* * *

[A most excellent article which covers so many twists and turns to reveal the incompetence and flawed policies of politicians over the past decades which has brought amongst us those of an opposing culture many of whom still consider our settled population as 'infidels'. Our countries foreign policy in the Middle EAST over the past decades with illegal wars-BLAIR and BUSH for the purposes of controlling the oil supplies. Over the past 100 years , the securing oil supplies by Britain -France-Holland and American companies- SAUDI-ARABIA... and the wealth obtained by the oil companies and countries involved but particularly SAUDI ARABIA has enabled the hardened feature of fanatical ISLAM to spread around the world but particularly in Europe and throughout the Middle East and Africa. The bribe offered Britain and USA particularly was investment in LONDON and NEW YORK and ARMS CONTRACTS. There is no longer a safe region of the world -where there are  fanatical supporters of ISLAM. Of course there are many moderate Muslims but even they ( DM.60% ?) who in the main would support their fellow adherents because it would be their life's cause to live in  an ISLAMIC STATE with FULL SHARIA LAW.  This is WHY! knowing the difficulties ,only a small number of MUSLIMS should have been permitted to immigrate to the UK on the condition that they could not be full citizens unless they fully integrated into SOCIETY. With such a large Muslim population of approximately 3,000,000 and with a birth-rate advantage of 4-1 it is probably now an almost unsolvable conundrum . But it must be faced down, or even greater dangers will follow in the years ahead. Therefore, as Mr Richard Littlejohn's article so clearly demonstrates, our politicians past and present by their laxity and political correctness and naivety are responsible for the present dangerous situation in our once -more spacious and less crowded and settled land.]

*

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION-

*

*

TOLERATION

'Toleration is a good thing in its place; but you cannot tolerate what will not tolerate you, and is trying to cut your throat.'- Froude

*

'Religious  liberty, according to both Locke and Montesquieu, may and does require intolerance of an intolerant religion; and the very spirit of peace and gentleness may require war be waged by the state against an aggressive religion.'- Connelly.

[The British Government won't clean up its own backyard let alone decide FOREIGN POLICY in order to PROTECT those of the CHRISTIAN FAITH in the world at large. What could be a better message at this time of the year to send out than that we will not tolerate the slaughter of CHRISTIANS or others of other FAITHS who's message is GOODNESS-PEACE and HARMONY for ALL MANKIND.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER 10-2016

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

MARCH 24 -2017

H.F.1156 FREEDOM NOW

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017--       - (1994 -Official Website-MARCH-2017 ) -   JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017-PT1 -

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW- PART 2-2017

INDEX - MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -UNACCOUNTABLE  CORRUPT-MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

 

MAR-17

APR-17

MAY-17

JUN-17

JUL-17

AUG-17

SEP-17

OCT-17

NOV-17

DEC-17

JAN-18

FEB-18

MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 
 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.
 

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW

  • IRON LADY

    •

  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 

  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britain would be 'calamitous self-harm'

  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union

  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive

  • Her speech was criticized by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 

  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro

By James Slack Political Editor For The Daily Mail



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

Brexit will let us rediscover role as trading power | Daily Mail Online

Theresa May's Brexit speech puts Cameron to shame | Daily Mail ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Commons and Lords get ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Full reports and analysis

 

A great nation is reborn: Quitting will let us rediscover our role as a ...

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771

Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.
 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS

THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 
 

 

[ PHILIP's

MARCH 2017

BUDGET

FOR

BOLDNESS & ENTERPRISE

IN A

DYNAMIC

BREXIT EXPANSION.

MARKS OUT OF TEN

NIL!

FOR A STAY MENTALITY]

*  *  *

Millions of savers will lose £315 in raid on dividends

Budget shocker for those who've got a diesel car

 

[THREE POINTS OF VIEW WITH MANY TRUTHS AND REGRETS  OF A LOST OPPORTUNITY TO MARK THE DAY WITH A BOLD ADVENTURE OF A NEW EPOC IN THE LIVES OF AN ISLAND PEOPLE ,WITH AS OTHERS HAVE SAID, THE

' WORLD THEIR OYSTER']

 DAILY MAIL

 

 

 

Incompetent,

 

No vision.

 

Anti Middle England

 

 

by

Peter Oborne

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

 

 

-So much for

Project Fear's

Budget

 from HELL

 

 

 

 

by Alex Brummer

 

DAILY MAIL

 

Yet again, a Budget that ignored the issues that will beggar our children

by Max Hastings

 

 

Daily Mail

 

 

 

NO LAUGHING MATTER :

 

 

 

Chancellor litters budget speech with jokes...but breaks manifesto pledge by hammering self-employed and savers-and your insurance bills will soar

By Jason Groves-Political Editor.

[WHEN ONE IS EMBARKING ON A MAJOR OFFENSIVE TO GET FREE OF THE EU ONE DOES NOT ISSUE INSTRUCTIONS WHICH WOULD DAMAGE MORALE AMONG YOUR CO-PATRIOTS-DELAY OFTEN  BRINGS WISDOM AND WITH IT VICTORY!]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.}

MARCH 9, 2017

H.F.1140 FREEDOM NOW
 BETRAYAL OF THE PEOPLE'S

HOUSE OF COMMONS

 IN

1972

BY a

 LYING AND DECEITFUL

EXECUTIVE

*

The Perversion of the House of Commons

Parliament was indeed the great object of all these politics, the end at which they aimed, as well as the instrument by which they were to operate.  But, before parliament could be made subservient to a system by which it was to be degraded from the dignity of a national council into a mere member of the court,[1770] it must be greatly changed from its original character.

IN speaking of this body, I have an eye chiefly on the House of Commons.  I hope I shall be indulged; not with regard to its legal form and power, but to its

SPIRIT

and to the purposes it is meant to answer to the constitution.

The House of Commons was supposed originally to be no part of the standing government of this country. It was considered as a control. issuing immediately from the

PEOPLE

and speedily to be resolved into the mass from whence it arose. In this respect it was in the higher part of government what juries are in the lower. The capacity of a magistrate being transitory, and that of a citizen permanent, the latter capacity it was hoped would of course preponderate in all discussions, not only between the people and the standing authority of the crown, but between the people and the fleeting authority of the House of Commons itself. It was hoped that, being of middle nature between subject and government, they would feel with a more tender and a nearer interest  everything that concerned the people than the remoter and more permanent parts of legislation.

Whatever alterations time and the necessary accommodation of business may have introduced, this character can never be sustained, unless the House of Commons shall be made to bear some stamp of the actual disposition of the people at large. It would (among public misfortunes) be an evil more natural and tolerable that the House of Commons should be infected with every epidemical frenzy of the people, as this would indicate some consanguinity, some sympathy of nature with their constituents, then that they should in all cases be wholly untouched by the opinions and feelings of the people out of doors. By this want of sympathy they would cease to be a House of Commons.  For it is not the derivation of the power of the House from the people which makes it in a distinct sense their representative. The king is the representative of the people; so are the lords; so are the judges. They all are trustees for the people, as well as the commons; because no power is given for the sole sake of the holder; and although government certainly is an institution of divine authority, yet its forms, and the persons who administer it, all originate from the people.

A popular origin cannot therefore be the characteristical distinction of a popular representative. This belongs equally to all parts of government, and in all forms. This virtue, spirit, and the essence of a House of Commons consists in its being the express image of the feelings of the nation. It was not instituted to be a control upon the people [As the EU],as of late it has been taught, by a doctrine as a control for the people. Other institutions have been formed for the purpose of checking popular excesses; and they are, I apprehend, fully adequate to their object. If not, they ought to be made so.  The House of Commons, as it was never intended for the support of peace and subordination, is miserably appointed for that service; having no stronger weapon than its mace, and no better officer than its sergeant-at-arms, which it can command of its own proper authority. A vigilant and jealous eye over executory and judicial magistracy; an anxious care of public money; an openness, approaching towards facility, to public complaint; these seem to be the true characteristics of a House of Commons and a petitioning nation; a House of Commons full of confidence, when the nation is plunged in despair; in the utmost harmony with ministers, when the people regard with utmost abhorrence; who vote thanks, when the public opinion calls upon them for impeachments [Tony Blair -war criminal - and others guilty of TREASON.] who are eager to grant, when the general voice demands account; who, in all disputes between the people and administration, presume against the people; who punish their disorders, but refuse even to inquire into the provocations to them; this is unnatural, a monstrous state of  things in this [ENGLISH] constitution.  Such an assembly may be great, wise, awful senate; but it is not, to any popular purpose, a House of Commons.

HOME AFFAIRS

Edmund Burke-(1728-1797)

One of the greatest parliamentarians if not the greatest of the 18th century

BURKE

EDMUND BURKE SELECTIONS with ESSAYS by HAZLITT-ARNOLD & OTHERS

OXFORD

AT THE CLARENDON PRESS

Impression of 1930

First edition 1921

*

IN

2017

MPs to get £76,000 a year after being handed pay rise | Daily Mail ...

WHILE

 

Budget 2017: Hammond's raid on self-employed breaks ... - Daily Mail

 

*

[A SELF-EMPLOYED MOTIVATION

IS

THE BEDROCK

OF OUR TRADITIONAL CHARACTER AS A NATION OF SMALL

ENTERPRISING TRADERS

 AND

SHOP KEEPERS.]

*

IT WAS NOT THE S£LF-EMPLOYED WHO  WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL DEBT OF

 £1.8 BILLION

IT WAS THOSE PREDECESSORS OF PHILLIP HAMMOND AND OTHERS IN THE PEOPLE'S HOUSE OF COMMONS.

SO

MR HAMMOND

  YOU DON'T

 SQUEEZE THEM AND TREAT THEM AS TRASH

OR YOU WILL SURELY

'KILL THE GEESE THAT LAY  THE GOLDEN EGGS.'

[We finally got it right!-thank-you!]

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

MARCH 9-2017
DAILY MAIL

 COMMENT:

March 11-2017

 

Stop playing politics with

 public trust

This has been a truly dismal week for public trust in politics and politicians. It began badly, with another attempt by the unelected Lords-spearheaded by that preening popinjay

Michael Heseltine

To thwart the PEOPLE'S WILL OVER

brexit

Then came the

BUDGET

, in which Chancellor Philip Hammand cherefully tore up one

 TORY ELECTION PROMISE

after  another , laughing and joking

[at the unsuspecting taxpayers]

as he heaped punishment on the strivers, savers and self reliant risk-takers who make up the backbone of

BRITAIN

-the very people his party had voted to CHAMPION

It was less than two years ago that the

 CONSERVATIVES

went to the polls on a

PROMISE

spelled out four times in their

MANIFESTO:

'We will not raise VAT, National Insurance contributions or Income Tax.' ...

DEATH TAX, he is now pushing through..

.a HUGE INCREASE IN DEATH TAX

In that now discredited, apparently worthless document, there was no suggestion the pledge referred only to Class 1 NICs (How many voters even knew there were four classes?)

Yet this was the devious excuse offered after the Chancellor increased the rate for Class 4, costing 2.4million self-employed workers some £240 a year each-almost, eight times the 60p-a-week'average' he so disingenuously cited.

Not content with this betrayal of his party's core supporters, he slashed the tax-free allowance on dividends from £5000 to £2000. Thus, he hammered family-owned businesses , freelance workers and every saver with stock masrket investments of more than £50,000.

Meanwhile, tax rises and changes to compensation payments are likely to add £75 a year to car insurance premiums.

But still Mr Hammond hadn't finished. Having joked he would not exhume Labour's

DEATH TAX

he is now pushing through... a huge increase in death tax!...

*

much more pain revealed in:

Full article

*

[WE ARE AT A LOSS TO UNDERSTAND HOW THE CHANCELLOR PHILIP HAMMOND COULD MAKE SUCH AN ENORMOUS CATASTROPHIC faux pass AT SUCH A TIME OF A CRITICAL - IMPORTANT-MOMENTOUS - HISTORICAL EPIC - IN THE LIFE AND TIMES OF OUR NATION'S HISTORY - OF THE PEOPLE AND ITS

 HOUSE OF COMMONS.

IGNORING HIS HIGH COMMAND ON THE FIELD OF BATTLE HE WOULD MEET HIS JUST REWARD FOR HIS BETRAYAL!

However ,it is possible ,that he was already on the retirement list, of his commander, for his insensitive personality? 

'Money is the nerve of the state'

Bodin

[Great care and equitable selection of choices must be the chief aims of the  the holder of the public purse. The neglect of these principles are all too truly revealed with the debt of the nation at 1.8 BILLION.  .AS we have stated on a number of occasions a nation should conduct its financial affairs as would a prudent family. If the State is unable to conduct its finances in a responsible way how can it expect its citizens adopting the same care-free attitude.  A family in debt is not in a position to give away money in a lackadaisical manner as David Cameron has ensured will continue because of his irresponsible legislation to increase

Foreign aid  

just as we are now informed in the latest Budget is further increased by £400 MILLION. Mr Hammond as a self-made millionaire should surely understand the unbusiness like action shown by this reckless  and wasteful so-called financial policy when the need of resources is so critical in many areas of the economy.]

*

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT:

 

Voters Hammond hammers at his peril

**

*

 

[Today the 12th of March 2017 we found a newspaper cutting in one of our books in our library. It concerns a column from an unknown source with a date of 3-5-49 with a heading which we feel may be of interest at this moment in time?]

TORYISM INTO REALISM

A "Junior " View

LIVING WITHIN OUR INCOME

From our Political Correspondent

Westminster, Monday, May 5,1949 [?]

The impact on the Conservative party of "Labour Believes in Britain"

was the subject of a speech made by Mr. David Eccles, the member for Chippenham, at the Junior Carlton club tonight.

The occasion is of more than usual interest since Mr, Eccles is one of the more clear-sighted younger Conservatives and since the Junior Carlton, though less authoritative than its disembodied senior, is so to speak, a nest of hereditary legislators.

Mr Eccles's theme was in this sentence:

" The self-satisfactions and insincerities of 'Labour believes in Britain,' odious as they are to many of us, are none the less the common coinage of those whose votes we seek: all of which makes a deal of difference to our politics."

The leaders of the Conservative party needed to understand the manners of the age, and to show that those who spoke for the party were aware that new habits of thought and speech had taken hold of the electorate.

" What difference, for example, does the coming of one head, one vote, make to such things as the distribution of property and the division of profits, the level of Government expenditure and the flow of savings, the position of women, and many other landmarks of the days that are over?

" It is this shrinking from the realities of our age which is at the bottom of the criticism leveled at Mr Butler, his friends and the charters,. We shall continue to talk off the point, to use words and ideas which are unreal, insignificant and divorced from events until our party has restated in vital vivid terms what Conservatism has to say to the new one-head-one vote electorate.

OLD VALUES REFASHIONED

Mr Eccles suggested a six-point programmed for refashioning of the old Conservative values:

1. A firm clear boundary should be drawn between the public and private sectors of Britain's economy.  The "intelligent voter"

 should be convinced of this sense and justice of this line of demarcation. " It is no good saying 'I believe in private enterprise" and leaving it at that. You might just as well say 'I believe in God' and expect to fill the churches.

2. The Conservatives should make clear their intention to see that the country lived within the national income. Respect for solvency used to be taken for granted by the middle-class. taxpayers who controlled the House of Commons. It is not taken for granted today and therefore requires most urgent restatement."

3 . A Conservative square deal for consumers should be defined, showing that it rests upon a rejection of nationalization a revival of competition, a maintenance of collective bargaining, and a steady flow of private savings.

4. The Conservative view of private property in society of one-head-one vote should be laid down. " we must not be shy about the fact that universal suffrage is incompatible, with great extremes of wealth. WE must state this as our belief and in the same breath convince the electorate that a property-owning democracy or, as I prefer to call it, popular capitalism will bring the opportunities for self-respect, for personal security and success which under State control are disappearing from our society.

LIMITS ON TAXATION...

5.

There should be strict limits on taxation and on the social services. Socialist " mismanagement " would compel the next Conservative Government to make large reductions in Government expenditure and in their early years of office, to use revenue to stimulate production and exports.

"That policy being inescapable to the electorate that once Britain's solvency has been rebuilt all subsequent increases in the national income will go, either through expansion in the social services or through relief's in taxation, to those whose need is greatest. Even accompanied by such an assurance, this policy asks of the people a severe readjustment of their hopes... The way back to reality is hard. It is unreasonable to ask of the Tory party to guarantee that, once Britain is out of the wood, future increase in the national income should go to those whose need is greatest?"

6.  There should be an insistence on the value of character. "The Socialists reakon welfare in terms of bread, circuses, and text-books.  Ought we not, as Conservatives, to add the public and private virtues that have made England a power for good in the world?  This Labour Government is wasting the character of the people just as surely as it is wasting their cash.  Your floating voter is already half aware of this double dissipation of the moral and material strength of Britain."

"This  is the essential challenge to the Tory party," said Mr Eccles. " During the boom in trade, which has mesmerised the nation in the last three years, it has not been easy to measure the deterioration going on all round us. WE have been blinded by paper money and capital profits.  Now the boom is ending and our duty, like  some great rock, begins to stand out clear and hard from the thinning mist of inflation. Shall we comprehend what is right to do, and do it with all our united strength?

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

MARCH 12- 2017

H.F.1140/3- FREEDOM NOW

March 11-2017

H.F.1140 FREEDOM NOW

 
HOW+THEY+WASTE+

YOUR+MONEY+

by+Margaret+Hodge

EXTRACTED from Called to Account: How Corporate Bad Behaviour And Government Waste Combine To Cost Us Millions by Margaret Hodge, published by Little Brown tomorrow at £18.99.

To order a copy for £15.19 (P&P free, offer valid to September 23,,2016), visit mailbookshop.co.uk or call

0844 571 0640.

Margaret Hodge will be speaking at the Henley Literary Festival on OCTOBER 1,#

http://henleyliteraryfestival.co.uk

[WE FULLY SUPPORT MARGARET HODGE IN HER EXEMPLARY WORK OVER MANY YEARS ON BEHALF OFF THE TAX PAYERS OF BRITAIN]

Wednesday, September 14,2016

H.F.973 BREXIT NOW

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

MARCH 9-2017

 

H.F.1140/1- FREEDOM NOW

 

World Freemasons gather in Tokyo to select new leader and golden age dawns

 

 

Posted by benjamin

March 13, 2017
 

The world’s freemasons are gathering in Tokyo this week and next to select a new world grandmaster, according to Japanese military intelligence. The meetings will start this week at the Freemason underground complex near Tokyo Tower and will conclude with a final leadership selection at the Sanno Hotel on March 25, the sources say. The meetings are taking place because a long term Freemason goal, the creation of a benevolent world government, is near completion, the sources continue.

There is also a lot of talk from multiple sources of some sort of event planned for March 15th, the Ides of March. This was the day that Julius Caesar was assassinated. This is also the day the US government will hit its debt ceiling. Asian Secret Societies, for their part place great importance on March 19th, the day the last Ming Emperor died (also, by coincidence, this writer’s birthday). Exactly what will happen is not clear but certainly the last half of March will see many world changes, multiple sources agree.

There is also extremely high tension worldwide as the various power centres jockey for position in the upcoming world federation, various sources agree.

The tensions are especially high now in Japan and the Korean Peninsula over who will occupy the throne of Emperor of a United Korea, the Japanese military intelligence sources say. The Rothschilds and the Chinese want to install Kim Han Sol, the eldest son of Kim Jong Nam, who is in turn the oldest son of former top leader Kim Jon Il, Chinese intelligence agency sources say. That is why Rothschild puppet politicians in Japan have called for a pre-emptive attack against North Korea.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-missiles-japan-idUSKBN16F0YE
That is also why various media reports suggested US President Donald Trump would be sending B-52 nuclear bombers to South Korea.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4298020/Donald-Trump-send-B-52-nuclear-bombers-Korea.html

However, the North Koreans say the Kim Han Sol being presented as candidate for Emperor is a fake with a different face from the real Kim Han Sol. To drive home their point, the North Koreans launched missiles capable of hitting US military bases in Japan. They also, according to Japanese military intelligence, deployed 100,000 North Korean special forces troops, armed with suitcase nuclear weapons, to the Japanese cities of Nagoya, Osaka and Tokyo.

The people behind Kim Han Sol, for their part, say Kim Jong Un is just a front for the Cabot family of Switzerland and the Nabeshima clan behind the Mitsubishi group that supports Prime Minister Abe.

Of course the current Japanese royal family is also fake but the fact they actually occupy the throne gives them some legitimacy. The same can be said of Kim Jong Un.

Speaking about Japan, the power struggle here is also intensifying. The Khazarian Mafia has handed over control of the Japanese election stealing machinery to

 

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

 

Organized Crime
 

Desperate counter attack by Satanic mafia failing on all fronts as human liberation nears

 

 

Battle to free humanity accelerates in US Japan Israel Korea and elsewhere

 

Posted by benjamin

February 27, 2017

 

The world-wide takedown of the Khazarian mafia is accelerating with arrests, assassinations, information warfare, financial warfare and more esoteric forms of combat, according to multiple sources.

There is also a flare up of activity in Antarctica. Top US and Russian generals Joseph Dunford and Valery Gerasimov met on February 16th and “launched a combined US-Russian force steaming toward Antarctica after the cabal set off nuke,” according to Pentagon sources. This “nuke” is apparently the source of radiation being detected in various parts of the atmosphere and so there will be serious retaliation, other Pentagon sources said.

There are also reports that all civilian personnel are being evacuated from Antarctica and that large contingencies of special forces are arriving with state of the art scalar and other weapons technology.,

http://www.disclose.tv/news/mass_evacuation_of_antarctica_as_special_ops_and_military_moving_in/137988

Mass Evacuation Of Antarctica As Special Ops And Military …
www.disclose.tv

- UFOs & Aliens – Mass Evacuation Of Antarctica Happening Just Now. All Civilians and Scientists Being Flown Out. Special Operations And Military Moving In.This …

Pentagon sources are also saying the “Deep quake in Bolivia may have been a message to the Bushes in Paraguay and their drug lords in Peru and Bolivia.”

There is also a lot going on in Japan and Korea related to the Bush/Clinton Nazi faction’s allies the Unification Church, who have a ranch next to the Bush ranch in Paraguay.
The official government seal or chop (the Japanese equivalent of a Presidential signature) of Japan has passed into the hands of Crown Prince Naruhito and he immediately

 

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please login.

 

Organized Crime

 

A few dozen arrests might be all it takes to free humanity now

Posted by benjamin

February 20, 2017

 

 

Posted by benjamin

February 20, 2017

 

H.F.1124 FREEDOM NOW

 

Daily Mail

 

 10 per cent of Islamists in UK are from 5 districts of Birmingham.

 

By Ian Drury for the Daily Mail

 

MARCH 5, 2017

 

Terrorism in the UK more than trebles in 5 years | Daily Mail Online

MARCH 6-2017

H.F.1134 FREEDOM NOW

     

    News for eu news germany

     

     


     Express.co.uk

     
    Merkel's nightmare: Now GERMANS question

    Chancellor's dreams of European Union superstate

    Express.co.uk - 17 hours ago
    THE most Europhile country in the entire European Union is feeling its first
    rumblings of anti-establishment anger as Germans begin to question ...

     

     

    What the EU Court ruling

     

     

     

     

     on headscarf bans

     

     

     

    means for Germany ...

     

     

    14 March 2017.

    [Mrs May has said she will not ban headscarves at work but an

    Islamic cleric has stated that it is not compulsory for a Muslim

    to wear such head dress or a Burka. It is a means to push an

    Islamic agenda even if others prefer a neutral atmosphere at

    work and or many also in the general community. It is

    particularly so when particular leftist broadcasters tend to

    pursue their own  discredited multicultural dogma and

    encourage an over-the-top presentation as we witnessed which

    was more like an Islamic warrior going into battle instead of an

    interviewer in a British broadcasting studio.

    It is this senseless and brainless attitude of those who cannot

    understand that it will be because of their blindness to the dangers

    of the NON-INTEGRATION of at  least 600,000

    60 %) of MUSLIMS in ENGLAND and with a birth-rate of 4-1 that in

    a generation or two there will be most likely an ISLAMIC STATE

    with FULL SHARIA LAW in parts or even throughout our

    country because of those politicians and others who cannot

    see further than their own faces that THEY ARE THE

    INDIVIDUALS WHO WILL CARRY THE BLAME when

    the BATTLE to RETAIN OUR CHRISTIAN  HERITAGE AND

    CULTURE will finally BEGIN!

    WHEN ONE CONSIDERS THAT IT WAS A EU COURT THAT MADE THIS RULING THEY MUST HAVE CONSIDERED  THE DANGERS AHEAD IF THEY HAD DELAYED THEIR VITAL DECISION ANY LONGER.

    (Apparently, the Hungarians have showed them the way.)

    Mrs May has stated that she will not bring in a BAN . Well! that is a matter for the HOUSE of COMMONS and unless she has a change of heart then she will be primary responsible for what develops over the next decade or so. WE have already proof that many strong government measures previously brought into place are being abandoned.  We can understand that she has a great deal on her plate at the moment but deciding to

    PROTECT OUR CHRISTIAN HERITAGE

     AND

    CULTURE

    must surely always be in her MIND!]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    MARCH 14-2017

     

      News for Daily Mail-Staff can be sacked for wearing Islamic scarves


       Daily Mail
      EU Court of Justice rules bosses can ban headscarves
      Daily Mail - 1 day ago
      Bosses can ban workers from wearing headscarves, the top European Union's
      court has ruled. It is the court's first decision on the issue of women wearing
      Islamic ... had an 'unwritten rule' that employees should not wear any political, ...
      51, a marriage counsellor sacked after saying he might object to giving ...

    As expected a C of E spokesman said-

     

    'While The imposition of blanket bans-while

     

    often

     

    seeking honourable outcomes-may represent a world-view

     

    based on dogmatic

     

    assumptions which may unjustly limit individual rights.'

     

    *  *  *

     

    [What a load of waffle?

     

    The spokesman should give up the CHURCH and join the LAW

     

    which would certainly appreciate his nonsensical

     

    verbal   dexterity.]

     

    MARCH 14-2017

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!
 

H.F.1146 FREEDOM NOW

 BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JANUARY-2007

 

 

WHY NO QUESTIONS IN THE HOUSE AFTER REAL RACISM REVEALED IN MOSQUES IN HOME COUNTIES?

*

REAL RACISM REVEALED

CHANNEL 4

 

by

LITTLEJOHN

[Daily Mail-Friday, January 19-2007]

 

CHANNEL 4 has done us all a great service this week in exposing the vile racism and hatred which lurks within the British society.

 

The camera has laid bare the vicious enmity which so many of our fellow citizens harbour towards those of different ethnic backgrounds and religious beliefs.

But ,NO!, I'm not talking about Big Brother, I'm referring to 'Dispatches' which was broadcast on Monday night -the 15th January-2007.

Secret filming of incendiary sermons at some of Britain's leading' moderate ' mosques reinforced the findings of Sue Reid's investigation in last Saturday's Daily Mail into Islamic rabble-rousing in the Home Counties.

It would be sloppy shorthand to describe the revelations as 'shocking', Alarming, maybe, but not a shock.

This documentary only served to confirm what many of us have long taken as read -

 namely that what is preached inside a number of Muslim places of worship in Britain is diametrically opposed to what ' community leaders' say for public consumption.

Over four months, Dispatches recorded an assortment of mad mullahs calling for 'jihad' (Holy War) against the 'kuffaar' (Unbelievers)

Muslims are urged to hit women who refuse to wear the hijab, kill homosexuals , reject BRITISH LAW and democracy and set up in this country an Islamic State within a State.

Praise is lavished on  those who kill British soldiers, particularly the Taliban. The hero of Islam is the one who separates his head from his shoulder,' screams one imam at the Sparkbrook mosque, in Birmingham, which has been hailed by TONY BLAIR for its contribution to its MULTI FAITH and MULTICULTURAL activities'.

 

The unrelenting message is one of Muslim world domination and denigration of 'infidels'.

 

At the nearby Green Lane mosque, Channel 4's undercover reporter was directed to a secret website where the popular convert Abu Assama preaches that JEWS and CHRISTIANS are the ENEMY of ISLAM and it is the DUTY of ALL MUSLIMS to FIGHT THEM.

Green Lane mosque, back-rolled by SAUDI ARABIA is the headquarters of the radical organisation

Markali Jamat Ahi-Hadith, which is affiliated to the 'moderate'

MUSLIM COUNCIL of BRITAIN.

 

At the Regent's Park mosque ,in London, as well as many others, through-out Britain, DVDs disseminating the discounting slurs on the (kuffaar' )are on

OPEN SALE.

Needless to say, the 'moderates' who run these mosques deny any knowledge of the

PREACHERS of HATE

-and their violent propaganda, which almost exclusively follows the teachings of the extremist Wahhabi movement in SAUDI ARABIA.

 

They claim not to be able to control what is sold in their bookshops or what is said in their mosques or community halls, which are hired to a number of outside groups.

If they popped their heads round the door for 30 seconds they wouldn't be left in much doubt.

 

Can you imagine, what would happen if a Conservative Club was regularly letting its function room to white supremacists.?

A couple of weeks ago , after the Guardian had wasted seven months on an undercover investigation telling us -

shock, horror! -that the BNP is pretty unpleasant, I wonder why neither they or the rest of the so-called

'LIBERAL MEDIA'

-ever bothered looking in to what goes on in

BRITAIN'S MOSQUES

 

So Dispatches is to be congratulated on the EXPOSE and its reporter on his BRAVERY. If there were any JUSTICE, this PROGRAMME would win a BAFTA.

The 'anti-racism' brigade aren't interested in these inconvenient TRUTHS about ISLAMIC FANATICS.

I looked in vain for any mention of this programme in the

GUARDIAN

INDEPENDENT

NOTHING, nada, zilch.

 

Unless I missed something, it didn't even warrant a line on

Channel 4 News.

-which immediately preceded Dispatches -even though cross-promotion -is the lifeblood of any TV network.

[Well we found that Jon Snow's ready acceptance of RACISM in the BIG BROTHER row was indicative of his and Channel 4's cowardness to face the facts  fairly in direct contrast to their total silence on such an important matter as the confirmation that the 'ENEMY WITHIN' is a FACT in our society in 2007 and NOT a figment of someone's imagination.]

[Further details to follow]

 

*          *          *

 

JANUARY/07

*

[The latest information in the last few months of 2017 is that the GOVERNMENT is not prepared to follow through with it's necessary tough measures against the FUNDAMENTALISTS called for by responsible Muslim Clerics. They will see it as yet again as a sign of weakness and the extremists will believe their prayers have been answered and will bide their time , and go underground, and await their moment to turn ENGLAND into a SHARIA LAW led ISLAMIC STATE.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JANUARY-2007

 

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

 

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

 

 

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with

LONDONISTAN

 

 (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

 The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

 Diversity in the UK

 A ranking of social evils 

Multiculturalism and truth

 Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

 The aims of Localism

 

 

 

 

 H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

 

 

 

 

MUSLIM GROUP CALLS FOR THREE ISLAMIC STATES WITHIN THE UK

by Robin Phillips-2011

Islamic extremists are calling  for three independent states to be established within the UK.

If the plans are accepted, the Yorkshire towns of Bradford and Dewsbury as well as the East London town of Tower Hamlets would become autonomous ISLAMIC entities operating outside the British legal system.

The proposals were put forward by the

 MUSLIMS AGAINST the CRUSADES (MAC)

a group that was set up last year and is led by the extremist Abu Assadullah

The towns singled out by the group are already hotbeds of Islamic radicalism. Dewsbury was home to LONDON 7/7 bomber Mohammad Sidique Khan. In 2007 There were allegations that Muslims in Dewsbury were operating an Islamic court illegally out of a school. Last year the council of Tower Hamlets was accused of having been taken over by a MUSLIM extremist group.

the MAC group, who burned poppies during the REMEMBRANCE DAY silence, have  written on their website, " We suggest it is time that the areas with large MUSLIM population declare an emirate delineating that MUSLIMS trying to live within this area  are trying to live by SHARIA [LAW]   as much as possible with their own courts and communiity watch and schools and even self sufficient trade.

" Likely areas for these projects might be Dewsbury or Bradford or Tower Hamlets to begin with."

" In time we can envisage that the whole of the SHARIA might one day be implemented starting with these enclaves,"

Ian Greenwood, who leads the Bradford Council, said people would " not allow extremists to provoke them into violence".

[WHAT A MISCHIEVOUS AND NONSENSICAL REPLY so typical to avoid facing facts so common with the politically correct local  and Central Government officials who will not face the FACTS that the MUSLIM population is growing at an advantage of 4-1 and will in only a few decades be the prominent faith in many parts of ENGLAND.  Already a number of towns and cities have over 40/50% presence. The fact is that they are no doubt  that they are a FIFTH COLUMN within our country. AS we have seen apart from a few IMAMS regretting the murder of a soldier on our streets and the general Muslim population keep their heads down and we can be sure many of them are praying every day that once CHRISTIAN ENGLAND will soon be THEIR ISLAMIC STATE. As we have said for a number of years their should have been a restriction put on the number of Muslims permitted to live in ENGLAND because of the very dangers we see ourselves in today in January 2014.  One must remember that in Islamic countries they have very severe penalties against their own people apart from the severe way they deal with those of the Christian Faith within their borders with burning of their churches and the murder of their followers.  The reality is that the ardent severe Islamic Faith cannot coexist within a FREE SECULAR STATE because it is alien to its own RELIGIOUS LAW.  There are now in our country over 50 SHARIA COURTS  and the number is growing while our simple minded politicians appear lost on how to handle the matter and hearing the comments of Jon Snow about the comment of Mr Farage of the FIFTH COLUMN WITHIN which we have stated  is THE ENEMY WITHIN shows that the political establishment is completely out of its depth on the matter and continue with their wholly response shelving the issue like they have done for decades because the reality is we no longer have STATESMEN of RENOWN  in our once respected HOUSE OF COMMONS as the affairs of STATE are now run by PYGMIES completely out of their depth. Hopefully in May 2015 the PEOPLE will throw out the incompetent GANG OF THREE and vote for the small parties to bring some LIFE! and Realism back into POLITICS which has been missing for a number of generations and hopefully the inequitable atrocious growing gap of earnings between RICH and POOR will finally be made a MAJOR ISSUE in a fairer economy in a BETTER WORLD with WAR an exception not a RULE!

IT IS AN ENEMY WITHIN

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JANUARY 8-2015

H F 461

 

Root out radicals in our schools and jails, says counter extremism expert MAAJID NAWAZ 

By

 Maajid Nawaz For The Mail On Sunday

Published: 03:28, 15 November 2015 | Updated: 03:28, 15 November 2015

Maajid Nawaz is the co-founder of Quilliam Foundation, the counter-extremism think tank.

Maajid Nawaz is the co-founder of Quilliam Foundation, the counter-extremism think tank.

For the IS death cult and its followers, Friday, November 13, will seem to have been a very real victory.

It is true that the world is witnessing a global war the likes of which we have not seen before – and an urgent response is needed. Yet it has been a profound mistake for our leaders to concentrate on well-known figureheads abroad.

Was it really the case, as the Obama administration claimed, that by killing Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and jihadism had been defeated? We now have our answer.

Mohammed Emwazi or ‘Jihadi John’ may be a towering figure in popular imagination, but his targeted killing last week will not make a major difference to the threat we face. The true roots of this destructive militancy lie elsewhere – much closer to home, however uncomfortable that might be for us to accept. Jihadism now has deep roots among an entire generation of angry young European Muslims, including many in Britain.

Thousands have left to join IS from these shores and elsewhere.

I know from my own experience – and as a former extremist myself – just how powerful the poisonous ideology of jihad can be.

For too long we have allowed it to permeate the minds of our young people.

Yet it is not, as many suppose, just a handful of imams who are to blame for this radicalism. There is a whole industry of activists – sometimes in the guise of advocacy groups and campaigners for human rights – who travel round mosques, universities, colleges and even community centres filling the heads of young Muslims with hateful ideology.

This does not by itself create a generation of terrorists, but it creates an atmosphere; a new world of non-violent extremists.

Who would tolerate a society of non-violent racists? Why, then, do we accept this culture of hate?

It is here that the answer lies.

No insurgency is sustainable, or even possible, without a level of residual support for its ideological aims among the core communities from which it draws its fighters.

Unfortunately, London is well overdue an attack similar to the one we saw in Paris on Friday.

 

 

NOVEMBER 15-2015

*  *  *

[THE ROOT CAUSE WAS THE ERROR OF SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS WHO IGNORED THE MANY WARNINGS DECADES AGO OF UNRESTRICTED IMMIGRATION PARTICULARLY FROM THOSE OF A DIFFERENT AND FUNDAMENTALIST CULTURE SUCH AS ISLAM. AS WE HAVE STATED MANY TIMES THE NUMBERS SHOULD HAVE BEEN RESTRICTED IN ORDER THAT THERE WOULD HAVE MORE POSSIBILITY OF INTEGRATION AND ONLY IF THAT WAS SUCCESSFUL SHOULD FULL CITIZENSHIP BE GIVEN.

UNTIL THE HARD-LINE FUNDAMENTALIST SAUDI GOVERNMENT IS REPLACED THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF MUSLIMS MAKING ANY ATTEMPT TO DO SO BECAUSE WITH

3,000,000 ADHERENTS TO THE FAITH AND THEIR HIGHER BIRTH RATE AT 4-1

WHY SHOULD THEY WHEN THEY KNOW THAT IF THEY REMAIN TOGETHER AND AVOID JOINING THE COMMUNITY THAT ONE DAY SOON THEY WILL ACHIEVE THEIR ISLAMIC STATE. AFTER ALL THEY ALREADY HAVE SHARIA LAW -OF SORTS -TO ENSURE THEY VOTE FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY. 

THE SUCCESS OF BREXIT WAS A SEVERE SHOCK FOR THE POLITICALLY-CORRECT ELITE OF THE GANG OF THREE WHO ARE BEWILDERED AT THE  CHANGES NOW TAKING PLACE IN THE UK-US AND EUROPE AND ACROSS THE WORLD.-THE PLAIN PEOPLE ARE IN REVOLT-THEY WANT THEIR VIEWS TAKEN IN ACCOUNT AND NOT IGNORED AS HAS BEEN THE CASE FOR OVER A GENERATION OR MORE! -

GLOBALISATION IS DESTROYING NATIONAL INTERESTS  -

GREED IS RAMPANT-

-ROBOTS WILL REPLACE JOBS- SO MORE REASON TO RESTRICT IMMIGRATION . THE RICH ARE GETTING RICHER AND THE POOR ARE GETTING POORER BUT THE FUTURE WILL BE BRIGHTER FOR MANKIND AS WE ENTER NEW AGE OF DISCOVERY AND EXPLORATION IN MIND AND MOTIVATION IN A FULLER  LIFE EXPERIENCE OF HOPE AND HAPPINESS IN A NEW WORLD]

 MARCH 7-2017

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H F 1135

 

 

 

 

Daily Mail

 

 GEORGE'S TICKING TIME-BOMB LEGACY

Insidious stealth taxes.

Deeply flawed gimmicks.

 Failed saving schemes.

 George Osborne was fired month's ago- BUT

on the eve of the BUDGET, a damning analysis exposes the poisonous inheritance he left BRITAIN

George's ticking time-bomb legacy: Insidious steal taxes ... - SPECIAL REPORT

 by

Leo McKinstry

 
EXTRACT

 

...But the job was half done.

Chronic weaknesses remain. Britain's overall debt continues to grow and now stands at a shocking

£1.8TRILLION

while the annual deficit - the gap between spending and revenue-is still stubbornly high at

£6 8 BILLION.

(that's £1000 for every adult and child in the country.)...

[WHAT A DEVASTATING REPORT

REVEALS]

*

INSURANCE.

*

CAR TAX.

*

STAMP DUTY

*

BUSINESS RATES

*

BUY-TO-LET

*

PENSIONS

*

FOREIGN AID

*

MINIMUM WAGE

*

HELP TO BUY BONUS

*

LIFETIME ISAs

*

PROBATE

*

 

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MARCH 7, 2017

H. F . 1136 FREEDOM NOW
 
 
 
 

 DAILY MAIL

 

PETER OBORNE

ON POLITICS AND POWER

**

BREXIT

offers us the chance to reunite with our

TRUE FRIENDS

*

 

FOR A MOMENT, imagine France is the kingpin of a huge international body made up of 53 SOVEREIGN STATES, containing a THIRD of the WORLD'S POPULATION. Imagine, too, that all these countries feel a deep affection for FRANCE and share a COMMON HISTORY dating back centuries.

In addition, suppose these countries, including many of the most dynamic and fast-growing nations in the world, had adopted the

FRENCH LEGAL SYSTEM, and that THEIR BUSINESS and POLITICAL ELITES speak fluent FRENCH.

If this were the case, you could be certain the French would make the most of such a brilliant

NATIONAL ASSET

treating it with

RESPECT

and continuing to forge  the closest possible 

ALLIANCE.

Unfortunately for the French, who over the years cruelly mistreated their colonial subjects, no such organization exists.

However, the British are part of such a body.

IT IS CALLED

THE

COMMONWEALTH.

Yet our leaders are guilty of treating it with scorn and contempt.

Over four decades, our government have shamefully ignored the

BENEFITS of the COMMONWEALTH

Successive Prime Ministers from Edward Heath onwards have been blind to its

ECONOMIC, CULTURAL AND SOCIAL VALUE.

It is no coincidence that those decades of disgraceful neglect have coincided with Britain's membership of the EU.

Part of the reason for this lies with the ridiculous sense of self-loathing by

BRITISH LIBERALS

on account of our former EMPIRE. Crippled by a post-imperial cringe, they have idiotically preferred the sclerotic, statist conformity of a

GERMAN-DOMINATED EUROPE

to the exciting potential of the COMMONWEALTH that SHARES many of our BELIEFS. Only the Queen, as Head of the Commonwealth, has taken the organization seriously. Indeed, she considers her nurturing of this magnificent institution her greatest achievement...

[But as stated in the article below by the writer A. N. Wilson in a Daily Mail some years ago, the Queen was not politically robust when it mattered most.]

 

...

With Mrs May as Prime Minister, I am convinced that after years of neglect.  Government policy is changing and it is ready to seize the opportunities the Commonwealth can provide in Britain.

Indeed , countries such as India, Nigeria, Malaysia, Australia, South Africa  and New Zealand offer the UK much more long-term potential than continental Europe.

Crucially, they are better attuned to the demands of the 21st century than is the EU, which is suffocated by regulation/

The Commonwealth's diverse membership is bound together by informal networks and shared values rather than by stifling rules imposed by a

[GERMAN LED] CORRUPT and UNACCOUNTABLE BRUSSELS COMMISSION.

It celebrates FREE MARKETS, not TRADE BARRIERS. It stretches RIGHT ACROSS THE GLOBE

THANKS TO BREXIT

BRITAIN has a huge opportunity to engage properly again with this vast and booming TRADING BLOCK that REPRESENTS most of the

WORLD'S LEADING ENGLISH-SPEAKING DEMOCRACIES.

*  *  *

Full article

 

 

 

 

PETER OBORNE: Brexit offers us the chance to reunite ...

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MARCH 4,  2017

H .F.1137 FREEDOM NOW

 

Brought-Forward from October 2008

HOW DID WE GET IN THIS MESS-HOW DID THE ABSENCE OF INFLUENCE BY THE MONARCH LEAD US ON THE

 ROAD TO THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR FREEDOM AND COUNTRY?

*

In his detailed and enlightening article

WHO KILLED BRITAIN

 featured in the Daily Mail on the 11th October 2008. The author A. N. Wilson stated:

'The QUEEN has many virtues but POLITICAL COURAGE is NOT ONE OF THEM, and in allowing PARLIAMENT thus to fall further into DISREPUTE - SHE WAS IN THE WRONG....'

The Influence of the Sovereign

.It is said that 'Queen Victoria's personality is evident on every page of the political history of England during her long reign. She was a clog on the activity of every Liberal Government after 1841 and a stimulus to every Conservative Government after 1868. Whether her influence was, on the whole, for good or ill must be left to historians; and historians will come to their conclusions according to their initial assumptions.'

In the reign of Elizabeth the II on the surface there appears the impression that HER MAJESTY has on the whole left political questions to HER MINISTERS even when they lied and gave misleading advice which has led the 'KING in PARLIAMENT' to have as far as we can judge NO INFLUENCE AT ALL as seen by willingly signing successive EU TREATIES even though HER MAJESTY must have been aware of the final objective -the destruction of the CONSTITUTION which SHE with HER MINISTERS had sworn to UPHOLD.

Of course convention is that the monarch must give way to her ministers or accept their resignation. Surely in the case of HER MINISTERS destroying the CONSTITUTION before her eyes should she not have said 'I AM NOT FOR TURNING? The least that HER MAJESTY could have done was to INSIST that HER PEOPLE were given THEIR ACCUSTOMED RIGHT in a REFERENDUM.

It has again been said that for ministers to say

"If we differ your opinion must give way to mine' is not an agreeable statement to hear, nor a prudent one to make to a person [THE QUEEN] who had a good deal of indirect power [Which she will not use] and the SPIRIT [Not known] to use it if  pousse'e a' bout."

The Sovereign's power to warn and advise is, nevertheless important. Of even more importance is his power to render less acute the controversies of political life and to secure agreements " behind the Speaker's chair". For mediation demands TACT, a quality which most monarchs possess. This power has been exercised repeatedly during the past three reigns [CABINET GOVERNMENT-W. IVOR JENNINGS, MA., LL/D.-1937]

Our Constitution depends on 'KING in PARLIAMENT- COMMONS and HOUSE OF LORDS' defending the CONSTITUTION and NOT selling OUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER. 

WITHOUT THE AGREEMENT of the  SOVEREIGN no LEGISLATION can PASS.

SO as they say in the U.S. the buck stops with the HEAD of STATE which in ENGLAND is

HER MAJESTY the QUEEN.

*

Millions are asking

WHERE IS OUR REFERENDUM

MAM?

 

*

[The EDP has always held the view that a Referendum to ask the  people whether they wish to be FREE or SLAVE is not a fit question to be put to a TRUE ENGLISHMAN.]

*

 For more details on the EU go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

OCTOBER-2008

 

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation Oath

 


 Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken her coronation oath, by signing these five treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories

  Ted Heath,

Margaret Thatcher, John Major and Tony Blair and finally Gordon Brown.

Realising they stood a good chance of spending the rest of their lives behind bars, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998 (s36.3), which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the five treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her she might have lost her crown (not her life or a limb), and kept her £9 billion plus palaces. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she's dead keen to sign; she's already said she'll sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can then never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a higher and darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI must be turning over in his grave.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected

Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

TREATY OF TREASON

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

  
EXTRACT

 

The Act of Settlement: last brick in the crumbling wall

Philip Lardner argues that the Act entrenched our national independence and freedom.

'Our Queen has been made a mere "citizen" of Europe and our Parliament and Head of State are subject to the rule of a modern" Court of Rome" based in Strasbourg and Brussels and demanding a huge part of our national income be paid over to it.

[You can understand why so many once nation states in Europe have joined the EU because for many who are recipients it is a bribe too good to miss.]

 

'...In the light of the foregoing, it is breathtaking to recognise that our political supremacy now rests unchallenged in Europe under the Treaty of Rome.  Our Queen has been made a mere "citizen" of Europe  and our Parliament and Head of State are subject to the rule of a modern "Court of Rome" based in Strasbourg and Brussels, and demanding a huge part of our national income be paid over to it.

All this eagerly ceded by politicians acting against their QUEEN and COUNTRY.  Interestingly, the Statute of Praemunire -along with several treason, Treachery and Sedition Acts-was quietly abolished in 1967, while Wilson maneuvered for entry to the EEC [but really the Nazi-war time planned EU]

Rodney Atkinson and Norris McWhirter laid charges of treason against Douglas Hurd and Francis Maud in 1993 due to the constraints placed on our Sovereign by the Maastricht Treaty; effectively deposing Her Majesty as the Sovereign and placing Her "in a position of suzerainty under the power of the European Union."   Unsurprisingly, the charges were never heard before a court.  As Sir John Harrington (1561-1612) said:

"Treason doth never prosper: What's the reason? For if it prosper none dare call it treason."

FREEDOM TODAY-Winter 2008/9

To Be Continued

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER-2013
 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 
 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS
 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/  ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/ ****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY / ****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

Brought forward from APRIL-2006

 

SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

*

Churchill in London -

St George’s Day-1953.

 

 

An excerpt from Sir Winston Churchill’s broadcast speech to the Honourable Artillery Company, given in London 40 years ago-at the Mansion House-London

on

 St. George’s Day, April 21st.1953

 *THIS ENGLAND

Publication -Spring-1993.

 

‘It is twenty years since I had to speak on the toast of

 ENGLAND

And on

St. George’s Day.

 

Twenty years - it’s a long time and a lot has happened, but in those bygone days I did try to see what would have happened if St. George had lived twenty years ago, and really it does apply very much to what might happen if he lived today.

 I said St. George would arrive in Cappadocia accompanied not by a horse but by Secretary of State. He would be armed not with a lance but with several flexible formulas.

 He would, of course, be welcomed by the local branch of the League of Nations Union - or I ought to alter that to be correct and say the United Nations Union.

 He would propose a conference with the dragon - a Round Table Conference - no doubt it would be so much more convenient for the dragon’s tail.

 He would make a Trade Agreement with the Dragon. He would loan the dragon a lot of money. The maiden’s release would be referred to Geneva (it would now be to New York), the dragon observing all his rights meanwhile. Finally, the dragon would be photographed with St, George.

 Now, I do not think there’s anything very wrong with this passage although twenty years have passed, but there are a few things I would like to mention about

ENGLAND

I’m not boasting but I would like to say that here no one questions the fairness of our

 Courts of Law and Justice.

We have our own way of life that is so. Here no one thinks of persecuting a man on account of his religion or his race.

 Here everyone, except the criminals, looks on the policeman as the friend and servant of the public.

 Here we provide for poverty and misfortune with more compassion, in spite of all our burdens, than any other country.

Here we assert the rights of the citizen against the

 STATE

 -       criticize the

-    GOVERNMENT of the DAY

-without failing in our duty to the

Crown

- or our LOYALTY to the

 QUEEN.

If I’m not detaining you too long there are two points I would like to make.

One is our weakness.

 Our weakness is that there are always a certain number of English people who wake up every morning -very brainy they are -they wake up and they look all round the fields and they think

 

‘NOW WHAT IS THERE THAT BELONGS TO OUR COUNTRY THAT WE CAN GIVE AWAY?’

 [Reminds us of Tony Blair and his cronies and adherents around the country in 2006.]

 or

‘WHAT IS THERE WE CAN FIND THAT HAS MADE OUR COUNTRY GREAT THAT WE CAN PULL DOWN?’

[Ditto -above -of course!]

 Well, that is the question they ask themselves and THAT IS OUR WEAKNESS - they are very brainy and they have done us a great deal of harm.

[Ditto- as above - of course!]

 On the other hand,

ENGLAND

-has a quality which no-one should overlook.

ENGLAND

-like Nature, never draws a line without smudging it.

 We lack the sharp logic of some other countries whom in other ways we greatly admire - in our climate, the atmosphere is veiled, there are none of these sharp presentations, an although we have our differences they do not divide us as they do in nearly all the other countries of the WORLD.

There is a great underlying spirit of neighbourliness and there is without doubt a strong sense of

 NATIONAL UNITY and LIFE

-       Which, though it doesn’t help us in the small matters with which we have to deal from day to day, may well be our Salvation in our troubles.

 ‘NOTHING CAN SAVE ENGLAND IF SHE WILL NOT SAVE HERSELF’

[That means each one of YOU in 2006]

 If we lose FAITH in OURSELVES, in our capacity to guide and govern, if we lose

our will to live,

then indeed

our story is told.

 If, while on all sides foreign nations are every day asserting a more aggressive and militant nationalism by arms and trade - if we remain paralyzed by our own theoretical doctrines or plunged in the stupor of after-war exhaustion, all that the croakers predict will come true and

 OUR RUIN WILL BE CERTAIN AND FINAL.

 But why should we break up the solid structure of British power founded upon so much, kindliness, and

FREEDOM?

 Why should we break it up for dreams which may some day come true but now are only dreams, or it may be nightmares?

 We ought as a nation and Empire -you won’t mind my mentioning that WORD? I didn’t get shouted down when I said it twenty years ago tonight -Empire, we might, we ought, to weather any storm that blows at least as well as any other existing system of human government.

 

We are at once more experienced and more truly united than any other people in the world.

 It may well be, I say, that the most glorious chapters of our history are yet to be written. Indeed, the very problems and dangers that encompass us in our country ought to make English man and women of this generation glad to be here at such a time.

We ought to rejoice at the responsibilities with which destiny has honoured us and be proud that we the guardians of our country in an age when her life is a stake.

I have lived, since then, to see

OUR COUNTRY

-accomplish, achieve her

FINEST HOUR

-and I have no doubt that if the

SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

-continues, there is no reason at all why twenty years hence someone may not stand at the table of this ancient company and speak in the sense of pride and hope in which I have ventured to address you tonight.

* * *

[Sadly -the twenty years later with the connivance of the many members of YOUR Parliament of ALL parties and many in the business community the

1972 Act of Accession to the EU -then falsely described as the EEC -European Economic Community came into being.

There are still politicians alive today in 2006 who betrayed their country and a distinguished few including Tony Benn who tried to get the people to see through the LIES and DECEIT which led eventually in 2005 to the almost absorption of ENGLAND and her sister nation-states into the

Despotic and Totalitarian Police State

calling itself

The United States of Europe.

It was the French and Dutch voters who saved ENGLAND in 2005 as our Prime Minister signed twenty fives times the Treaty in Rome which called for the Slavery of a People who had failed to remember the words of their greatest Prime Minister

Winston Churchill in 1953]

 

‘Nothing can save England if she WILL NOT save herself’.

* * *

THE TRUTH IN VERSE

of

Strasbourg and Brussels

(With apologies to Sweet Molly Malone)

by

John Culerwell

 

‘In Brussels’ fair city where the EU sits so pretty,

I first set my eyes on the European clone.

 And she wielded some powers that used to be ours

Till we tossed them away with the

Treaty of Rome.

She is a great sponger and sure to no wonder,

 her colleagues are all just the same.

 They all wield those powers that used to be ours

 Before we got timid and tame.

 It’s hard to describe them without being rude,

 Red tape is the product they freely extrude,

 By the edicts they issue fair trade is afflicted

 And poor nations’ prospects severely restricted.

On the fat of the land lives the Eurocrat Band

 And the Gravy train runs at full steam.

 Not for them the poor food of an African’s bread.

 The Clones live on the honey and cream.

They can only be sacked for blowing the gaff

 And telling the world the accounts are

naff.

 But they regulate this then subsidise that

 The handouts they hand out are financed by VAT.

Where Hitler has failed, the Clones have prevailed

 With the help of our legislators

 By these deeds of disgrace our MPs have lost face

 And can only be thought of as TRAITORS

They seek to enslave us

(ONLY UKIP CAN SAVE US)

 It’s all a set part of the Eurocrats aim.

 They are parasites ALL and they’ve got us in thrall

 And don’t know the meaning of SHAME.

The Clones, we abhor them, we didn’t vote for them

 If they think they are wanted the answer is NO!

 But due to their muscles in Strasbourg and BRUSSELS

 They thrive, they thrive-O.

 

*

obtained from:

 

Eurofacts

April 7-2006-04-07

Vol 11 No 13.

 08456 120 175

info@junepress.com

*

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 FRIDAY, APRIL 7, 2006

*

 WHY Brussels won’t take NO for an answer

 IN the very week that reveals more evidence of the cynicism and persistent illegality at the [ROTTEN] heart of the EU, Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson - who should concentrate on promoting FREE TRADE in a scandalously protectionist EU - pushes for a NEW CONSTITUTION that would hand BRUSSELS more power.

 You thought Europe’s INPERIAL ambitions were DEAD?

 THINK AGAIN.

 Ever since French and Dutch voters threw out the CONSTITUTION, Eurocrats have been busily introducing key elements of the DOCUMENT by the BACK DOOR.

 A European Public Prosecutor…

 a DEFENCE AGENCY…

 a CHARTER of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS…

 a FOREIGN MINISTER…

 all these and MORE are being foisted on us anyway.

 DEMOCRACY?

WHO CARES?

NOW Mr Mandelson [Meddlesome] wants to go the whole hog.

 He says NATION STATES must SURRENDER even MORE SOVEREIGNTY for the sake of an expanding EU, and of course he speaks for BRUSSELS.

 But examine the sorry reality behind his grandiose vision.

FRAUD is RAMPANT

 THE MONSTROSITY of the COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY

CONTINUES

 And this week

 EUROPE’S supposedly FREE MARKET is again exposed as a

SICK JOKE

 Twenty years ago, this country passed the SINGLE EUROPEAN ACT, as part of a European -wide initiative to TEAR DOWN barriers to TRADE.

 A GREAT IDEA

in

THEORY

 [which could have been achieved by all Nation States out of a DESPOTIC and TOTALITARIAN EU -with Britain giving the LEAD?]

 BUT in practice it is a FIASCO, with most of our ‘partners’ outrageously flouting the LAW (to the disadvantage of Britain, which generally abides by the rules).

NOT ONLY have Member States -notably FRANCE, GERMANY, SPAIN and ITALY -rigged their ENERGY MARKETS to frustrate FOREIGN COMPETITION, but also they and others have consistently

BROKEN THE RULES

on everything from

State Airlines to Telecoms.

NOW the [EU] COMMISSION reveals the SCALE of the LAW-BREAKING with a blizzard of actions against 17 members) including Britain, for a technical infringement [they HAD TO get us in the net with the true offenders]

BUT WILL ANYTHING CHANGE?

   [General de Gaulle  knew of our DIFFERENCES and vetoed our ENTRY to the then EEC and since a number of ex-COMMISSIONERS of the EU have said the same about how we would be the right example of conduct in the EU. What a waste of 34 years and the BILLIONS of POUNDS we have spent on a Fool’s errand because of the Nazi TRAITORS-

Edward Heath

 -Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon and countless others then and since and still today now within our midst.]

FRANCE isn’t suddenly going to abandon the protectionism it has got away with for years.

NEITHER WILL THE OTHERS.

 The habit of cheating is ingrained in an EU that is institutionally dysfunctional, corrupt and remote.

AND AS ALWAYS THE OPINIONS OF ORDINARY VOTERS MATTER NOT A JOT.

* * *

[We believe that the ONLY WAY to get us out of the mess of the EU would be for a CAMPAIGN for every voter to wear conspicuously a EMBLEM of their love of FREEDOM out of the EU and the others to wear chains from their mobiles or wherever so everyone will know who is for FREEDOM and who for SLAVERY.

Until there is a positive identification of the opponents within our community the GOVERNMENT can always say that it is only a FRINGE element involved. It is time to put aside OUR NATURAL RESERVE and not be afraid to wear a

 BADGE of FREEDOM

 We realise that in history even in our own country over 700 years ago wearing of insignia of a people led to evacuation of the Jews from ENGLAND until their return under Cromwell.

 Under the Nazi Regime we are all aware of the millions of Jews and many others who were murdered during the 2nd World War

THEIR INSIGNIA BROUGHT

DEATH

BUT

OUR INSIGNIA WILL BRING

 FREEDOM

Unless we put the issue above a PARTY and make it ONE of each INDIVIDUAL making a CHOICE for either

SLAVERY

or

FREEDOM

This way it will be impossible for the likes of Nice-Guy Dave and his close buddy Tony and their ilk to denigrate those who wish to be

FREE

Who will make a stand with others -together of what ever political persuasion or none? If we lost a relative many of us would wear a black armband or sombre clothing. Surely the possible total lose of

ONE’S COUNTRY and FREEDOM

demands some identification by each who no longer wishes to stand by and see the

 'Rights and Liberties'

of

 Englishman.'

 

of OUR INHERITANCE lost FOREVER.

*  *  *

[Font altered-bolding & underling used-comments in brackets]

APRIL/06

 *

 FINALLY REMEMBER!!!

 

*DID YOU KNOW?

The City of London is governed by the Illuminati-Freemasons and they are governed by their god Lucifer/Satan. The Bank of England owns the Central Banks established around the world, and this is the real power of the modern British Empire.

One example is the United States Federal Reserve Bank , which is wholly owned by the Bank of England and her subsidiaries. Thus the world has been enslaved by the Illuminati-Free-Mason conspiracy which exacts her tribute through interest on their various currencies.

"Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown 'slave' colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labour and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful."

"The Crown" has nothing to do with the Queen. It is a private corporation led by the Illuminati. (See: +(1)+(1)+(1)

Government Conspiracies - World of Lies - Award Winning Documentary

ZIONISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM

-A struggle for the soul of the Jewish People by the Rt.Hon. Winston S. Churchill-written in 1920

AUGUST - 2010

 BROUGHT FORWARD FROM APRIL 2006

MARCH 5-2017

H.F.1132 FREEDOM WILL SOON BE OURS!
 

Brought-Forward from March 24-2007

 

50 YEARS OF SURRENDER

 

Step by step. Brussels -which tonight celebrates the 50th birthday of the EU -has taken

CONTROL

-over every aspect of our lives.

We have witnessed in effect, an immense slow-motion

Coup d' etat

 

 

SATURDAY ESSAY

by

Christopher Booker

[Daily Mail -March 24-2007]

 

TONIGHT the city of Berlin will be the scene for a very special party. A giant all-night 'rave'. Thousands of young Berliners will be able to dance at 35 night clubs across the German capital, to music played by 100 disc jockeys.

 

Special buses will be laid on to allow them to roam around the city until dawn. And all those happy teenagers will be treated to free beer and bratwurst.

The bad news is that the £1million bill for all this fun and games is to be picked up by YOU and ME. Because the purpose of this monster party, organized by the German government officials at the expense of EU taxpayers, will be celebrate the 50th anniversary of the day in 1957 when the politicians of six European countries met in Rome to sign a TREATY to set up [and we were later set up] what was then called just the

'COMMON MARKET'

-that now half-forgotten entity which has grown over the decades into what we know today as

'THE EUROPEAN UNION'

It is safe to predict, however, that, apart from those German teenagers enjoying their 'rave', very few other folk across Europe this weekend will be doing much by the way of celebrating. The one exception will be the scores of politicians and thousands of officials [belonging to 'common purpose' an elite now growing in all parts of our communities.] who will also today be converging on Berlin . [We would class them as the foreign divisions of the Waffen SS- as there is also now in place in our once free country an above the law police force -fully armed to quell any future insurrection in our country.] to pay tribute to this historic moment in their own, rather different way.

[We have recently seen a more softly approach by the police forces in our country in closing the net on the 21/7 adherents of the London bombing as they now realise that their previous  heavy handed heavily-armed approach is too near a 30's Black-shirted Nazi approach so reminiscent of those days, to be used in Britain but not until the Declaration of Berlin is signed and ratified by Parliament.].

What Tony Blair and his ' partners' will be honouring is the launch of what we can now recognise to have been the most ambitious political project the modern world has seen since Lenin set up the Soviet Union in the Twenties.

The leaders of these six countries -Belgium, France, West Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands - who met in Rome 50 years ago were well aware that they were setting in train was intended eventually to grow into something more than a mere 'COMMON MARKET'. Even then, as we see from the documents of that time, they dreamed that it would be just the first step on the road to an eventual

EUROPEAN GOVERNMENT.

[The word 'common' is a favourite of the European Union talk-speak as we know in England today. There is an EU elite under the name of 'common purpose' who are in effect the true rulers of our country - details available from:

http://eutruth.org.uk

-these individuals have given their loyalty to the EU at the expense of their true loyalty to their country. They will replace your local councils and decide issues about your future from BRUSSELS.]

But who, in those far-off days when Europe was divided between the

FREE WORLD'

-of the WEST, led by America, and the grim Soviet empire to the East, could possibly have guessed at the progress their 'project' was to make over the half-century which followed?

[Well we are sure that Christopher Booker is talking about the mass of people at the time -but as he knows many very influential members of the community did speak out then and later. Whether politicians like Tony Benn and many other Labour MP's and others from the OPPOSITION . There were:

Winston Churchill

Enoch Powell

Field Marshall Montgomery

Lord Tonypandy- Speaker of the House of Commons

Lord Kilmuir-Lord Chancellor to Edward Heath's Government.

Even General De Gaulle in 1960 said our place was NOT in EUROPE

We have Harold Wilson in 1961 -To consider the Common market in simple black and white terms?

There were many people from all walks of life that warned about the CON-TRICK that was being played on THEM. But the majority would not believe that they were being deceived until it was too late to act.]

Gradually [the EU] it has expanded from those original six members, taking more and more countries under its sway (Britain joined in 1973) until now they number 27, stretching all the way from Ireland to the borders of Russia itself.

Only a handful of European countries have remained outside its embrace, including Switzerland, Norway and Iceland -all of which, it might be noted, are now richer per head of population than any other country in the EU.

 

During those decades the institutions which lie at the heart of the 'project' have steadily extended their powers, to such an extent that, just as those who set them up dreamed might one day happen, they are in effect a 'Government for Europe' in all but name.

[The European Union is NOT a STATE and that is WHY they MUST

have a signed

EU CONSTITUTION.

-That is the purpose of the Declaration of Berlin to lead to a final ratification of a

NEW EU CONSTITUTION

-and the slavery of a people with over well over a thousand years of constitutional development to emerge as the Mother of Parliaments of which over the past two hundred years its parliamentary democracy has been the beginnings of many new free nation-states many of which have now been ensnared into a monstrous diabolical unelectable corrupt godless collectivist police-state calling itself the

 European Union

-and only needs a JUNE 2007 ratification to make it a STATE.]

Today's European Union now has almost all the attributes of a fully-fledged STATE -its own flag, anthem and passport, its own 'citizenship' and currency, its own vast body of laws, governing almost every area of life. It is even on the way to establishing its own armed forces and police.

By any measure this is an astonishing achievement: one which would have had its founding fathers rubbing their eyes in disbelief. Nevertheless, there is no denying the fact that this weekend's celebrations are distinctly muted -and for this there are three main reasons.

*

REASON ONE

One ,as even the EU's leaders are themselves uncomfortably aware, is that, for all its remarkable political progress since 1957, the way their 'project' has worked out in practice offers few obvious grounds for unqualified rejoicing.

For years now , most of the economies of the EU, burdened by an ever greater weight of REGULATIONS from BRUSSE£S, have been performing significantly worse than those of their main competitors across the rest of the world, notably the U.S., China and India.

In many of the areas which are now subject to centralised

EU CONTROL

-from fishing and agriculture to international trade, it is scarcely a well-kept secret that the EU's record, characterised by massive bureaucratic OVER-REGULATION, has BEEN DISMAL.

*

REASON TWO

A second reason why so few 'EUROPEANS' will this week be celebrating this anniversary with any enthusiasm is that the

SYSTEM of GOVERNMENT

-it has led to seems so impersonal, so uninspiring and so remote.

 

[Well it is only in such an atmosphere of aloofness that the sticky fingers of the overpaid controllers of the EU can be hidden -though with their annual accounts not been cleared for over twelve years which any company trading in the UK would be not get away with one year of not having correct accounts passed the EU with its over 210,000 separate bank accounts scattered around the world finds its own philosophy

THAT WHAT THEY SAY IS - IS WHAT MATTERS

and

NOT ANY INQUISITIVE ACCOUNTANTS

-who wont do what they are told and have to be sacked by the likes of

NEIL KINNOCK

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

Although the peoples of Europe have become aware that this system is having an ever-greater effect on their lives, most of them don't really understand

HOW IT WORKS

They have a sense that they are ruled by a 'political class' made up of bureaucrats and politicians who are no longer in any way democratically accountable; a vast shadowy apparatus of government over which we no longer have a say.

[WE WOULD SAY THAT WE HAVE NEVER HAD OUR SAY all we have had is LIES- LIES- LIES- LIES........and even more LIES in 2007]

The result is that , not just in Britain [we say ENGLAND as it is possible that Scotland and Wales may wish to remain in the EU for the wonderful hand-outs but if England left the EU then as we have already explained on a number of occasions the EU would collapse because of the increased contribution and Germany, France and other net contributors to the EU BUDGET would have TO FIND.

As  William Pitt one of our greatest prime ministers exclaimed  on the 9th November 1805:

"England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example."

In 2007-England can do just that by refusing to sign any further treaty and also to extricate itself from the monstrous entity that is destroying Europe and its people.]

 

The result is that , not just in Britain, but all over the EU people feel alienated from those who rule over them, in a way which , in countries which still think of themselves as democracies, is quite unprecedented.

*

 

REASON THREE

The third reason why the celebrations of this anniversary are so downbeat is the mess they have got into over the 'CONSTITUTION.

The holy text was intended to mark the EU's final emergence on the world stage as a new STATE, taking its place alongside the U.S. as a world 'superpower', uniting half a billion 'European citizens' in what amounted to a giant

NEW COUNTRY

But then, of course, ,came those historic votes by the people of

FRANCE and the NETHERLANDS

-chucking out the

CONSTITUTION

-and plunging the 'project' into a CRISIS like nothing it has known before.

The most obvious response of the EU leaders has been to carry on [as is usual] as if

NOTHING HAD HAPPENED.

Again and again, since the French and Dutch voted

'NO'

-they have been smuggling in new laws or institutions which could only have been legally authorised by the rejected

CONSTITUTION

from the

European

 Defence Agency

and a new

Fundamental Rights Agency

-which is already being set up to enforce a whole tranche of

HUMAN RIGHTS

[As is usual the British Government has found a clause 308 in the original Treaty of Rome which they have been challenged in the House of Lords as to its use today under a pretext that all is above board -when in reality it is misuse of power and NOT INTENDED

-to be used as the Government states. But they and their pro-EU governments before them know that the majority of the people in the country are not aware of what is going on and until recently the PRESS

has we hope just in time shown its teeth with a  vengeance which we hope will make the present awakening in ENGLAND a great stir which will put the politicians back in their rightful place as 'Servants of the People'

 

BUT WE CANNOT BE SURE.]

*

Even now , they are trying to find ways of salvaging some of the central features of the CONSTITUTION, such as giving the EU a permanent president and its own foreign minister to act on behalf of all the 27 countries. -without having to go through all that tiresome business of holding yet more referendums

WHICH THEY FEAR THEY MIGHT LOSE.

But, DESPITE all these efforts to CHEAT their WAY ROUND an IMPASSE produced by those 'NO' votes , the EU's leaders are well aware that, in some respects, the onward march of their great 'project' has hit the buffers, in a way it has never done before.

For decades  that have been managing stealthily to take away the powers of national  governments, without ever asking the peoples of Europe whether this was what they wanted - until finally, just when the prize seemed within its grasp, the very people whose views they had ignored hit back to say that

THEY DIDN'T WANT ANY MORE OF IT.

Today, even Brusse£s's own polls show that, for the first time in 50 years the 'project' actually enjoys the support of

LESS THAN HALF OF EUROPE.

Another poll, published this week by the Financial Times, shows that, by a margin of nearly 2 to 1, people in five of the EU's six largest nations think that life has got worse since their country joined the club. (the only exception is Spain which, since it joined in 1986, has been showered with nearly

£100,000,000,000

-from EU taxpayers -[notably Germany-Britain -France and a few other net contributors.]

And in no country, it appears, is the EU more unpopular than

BRITAIN

[For raised revenue and land space the right word would be

ENGLAND

-the South East of England to be precise -the bulk of its wealth is spread all over our island with large handouts to Scotland Wales and the Labour constituencies.]

And in no country it appears is the EU more unpopular than in Britain, where the same FT poll found that nearly twice as many people would now like to see us

LEAVE THE EU

-as want us to stay in.

[Apart from those who have most to gain by staying in such as the elite calling itself 'common purpose, which must have tens of thousands of passengers there are also the millions who have been unaware of what has been going on behind their backs.

IN OUR ESTIMATION

OUT OF THE EU LOBBY-HAVE IT!

AT LONG LAST!]

 

Yet therein lies the rub. For the fact is that, if there is one thing on which all Britain's major parties are more firmly agreed than any other, it is that they have not the slightest intention of pulling us out. However unpopular the EU may have become., not just in Britain but all across Europe, we are stuck with this weird political construct, which now rules over our lives to a far greater extent than most people are aware of.

[The reason is obvious in England as there is

 NO

Pro -Portional Representation

which would give a chance for anti-EU parties to obtain seats in Parliament.

The Liberal party has been pushing the Pro-Portional Representation agenda for much of its history but they now find that they would be better off aligning themselves with either of the other political parties and still make their influence felt. That is why we have heard much of late about the LibDems either joining Labour or the Conservatives.

IT'S A SELL-OUT

 OF TRUE DEMOCRACY.

 

The Scots and the Welsh can have their PR but not the English.

The ENGLISH have the GOVERNMENT and POLITICAL SYSTEM they DESERVE because they have sat on their backsides too long though there has been a movement of late but it is the usual English characteristic we are always looking after the underdog and minorities that while we have done so we have failed to protect our own much fought-for inherited Rights and Liberties from a independent nation -state and people of 1500 years in the making.]

One of the subtlest strategies employed by the EU, as it has gradually taken over more and more power from national governments has been the way it has left each country's national institutions in place. Monarchies and Presidencies, national parliaments, civil services and legal systems have all been left standing, looking outwardly as if not very much has changed.

Yet over the decades they have all been gradually hollowed out

FROM WITHIN

-Today over vast areas of each countries national life, the power to decide policies and make laws no longer  lies in national capitals.

 

IT HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED TO OUR NEW 'SUPRANATIONAL' CENTRE OF GOVERNMENT IN BRUSSEL£s.

And the clever thing is how successfully most of this has been

OUT OF SIGHT.

[One has to ask one-self how have the politicians  been able to achieve their aim. In one word

BRIBERY.

As they say money talks and with the signatories of the previous five EU Treaties being rewarded out of a Nazi slush fund and with the EU accounting system being able to poach billions of euros over the past 50 years from the contributing member-states it is no wonder that the EU is no stranger to bribing in one way or another to get their schemes in place -and after 12 years the EU accounts have NOT be passed by their accountants.

[On March 6,2017-E U ACCOUNTS HAVE STILL NOT BEEN PASSED BY THEIR AUDITORS.

There is also the more subtle method of offering well-paid jobs in their hundreds of QUANGOS and of course there is the 'Common Purpose' elite who have every reason to be pleased with their lot. In the Soviet there were approximately 4,000,000 comrades of the Communist Party. And soon there will be millions in the Common Purpose' centres all over our country. Their loyalty will be to the EU

NOT TO THOSE WHO PAY THEIR WAGES.]

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE AWARE

-for instance, that it is

NOW BRUSSE£s NOT LONDON 

-or any other national government which makes our laws on how we dispose of our rubbish, on food safety, on how many hours we can work, on how company accounts have to be drawn up?

[WHAT A CHEEK THEY HAVE WHEN THEIR OWN ACCOUNTS HAVE NOT BEEN PASSED IN OVER 12 YEARS.

-doesn't this prove that the EU is only in existence because so many politicians and officials depend on that corrupt body for their enhanced way of life which so long as they toe the line they can have a job for life. Only a corrupt institution which had its beginnings from a LIE could have existed this long ONLY because the GRAFT has been spread everywhere to an ELITE which has grown with the increased patronage which itself needs feeding MORE and MORE and MORE.]

 

HOW MANY PEOPLE KNOW

-that it is Brusse£s which dictates which seed varieties we are allowed to plant in our gardens;  which prescribes down to the minutest detail, how we can make buses and cars; which lays down the height of office chairs, the design of our fire exit notices, the exact permissible measurements of destination displays in our trains?

IT IS THANKS to our joining that mere 'Common Market' 34 years ago that we have seen the near destruction of our fishing industry, once the largest in Europe; that many of our farmers, until 1973 the most successful in Europe, today wonder how much longer [except the Big Cats] can survive.

IT IS THANKS to the EU that millions of businesses are now stifled by an unending avalanche of costly red tape; ,while even the City of London now fears that a flood of new

DIRECTIVES from BRUSSELS

-could before long cost it its place as the leading centre in the world.

 

Step by step we have seen our politicians handing over to this weird new system of government control over almost every aspect of our national life, from the power to decide who can come here to live and work in Britain -to the way our judges now have to interpret the

LAW IN OUR COURTS.

What in fact  we have witnessed over the past 50 years, has been in effect an immense, slow motion coup d'etat

Our power to rule ourselves has been stealthily handed over to an entirely new kind of 'Supranational' government, over which we no longer have any meaningful democratic say.

Therein lies the real triumph of that breathtakingly ambitious 'project' which was set in train by the Treaty of Rome 50 years ago this weekend.

Although half a century later it no longer enjoys the support of half the 490 million people who must live under it, it seems there is now nothing we can do to change it ....

 

[WE DON'T AGREE

 -it only requires every eurosceptic supporter to flood into London in their millions and refuse to move until Parliament agrees to put the EU into reverse to

 

STOP IT DEAD.

We have already called for Unity of ALL eurosceptic parties/organisations and others to appoint a LEADER and make a DATE WITH HISTORY.

 

IT HAS BEEN DONE BEFORE

At that time it was

PARLIAMENT against the KING

 

TODAY IN MARCH 2007

 

It would be

THE PEOPLE AGAINST PARLIAMENT.

It has been established that the

TREATY of ROME

was obtained by fraud and deception and bribery as have

ALL FIVE - SOON SIX TREATIES

*

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, there are two key  provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

 

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation,

As the next section will show the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into day-light, to  begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

An even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariate has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] obligations to the European Union.

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amount to an ACT of WAR

-against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau, which is the successor organisation to the Abwehr Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration. It was the Abwehr that first established, as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which all subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate.

Al-Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded Muslim Brotherhood, is  a controlled cutout operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al-Qaeda operation is an extension of the same Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

[The above information -much which has been on our website since October 2005 can be confirmed at

International Currency Review

World Reports limited

108 Horseferry Road

Westminster

London SW1P 2EF

 

E-mail cstory@worldreports.org

website: www.worldreports.org

 

Returning to the negative response of Christopher Booker we can only conclude that the reason WHY there has been no back-lash against the actions of the EU is that it is a matter of just TALK and NO ACTION. There are hundreds of pamphlets/books and many lectures putting the case to the country at large but it must go in hand with action on the streets of our major cities particularly London and about Westminster about the consequences of belonging to that monstrous entity calling itself a STATE which of course it cannot be until the

Declaration of Berlin

is ratified by

YOUR

PARLIAMENT.

 

WHAT WE NEED IS

 ACTION!

 

 THERE MUST BE A CALL TO ALL EURSCEPTICS TO CONVERGE ON LONDON AND PARLIAMENT WHO WOULD BE FORCED TO BACK DOWN AND NOT RATIFY THE TREATY.

WHAT IS THE WORST THAT COULD HAPPEN

THEY COULDN'T PUT A MILLION PEOPLE IN PRISON

If you were fortunate to obtain a cell at least now they give you the door key and they show great respect in their addressing their visitors. You may even get community service which means you get the opportunity to rest and take things easy. And of course they will always SAY -PLEASE!

 

WE WOULD GO TO LONDON

Because of technical problems we are unable to receive emails but if anyone out there will join us then send your details to:

[Your details will not be revealed to another source -that you can be sure of.]

 

*

 BUT WILL YOU?

 

OR SHAME YOUR PARTY OR ORGANISATION BY TELLING THEM EITHER THEY DO IT BUT SOMEONE MUST.

SEE OUR

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

 

*

http://eutruth.org.uk

www.speakout.co.uk

or TEL: 0800 083 4894

Final proof that the new EU CONSTITUTION is being adopted by the back door.

 GOVERNMENT ADMITS acting ILLEGALLY over EU PROPOSALS-WELL ALMOST.

 

So Why Don't We Leave The EU?

 

 

*          *          *

[Font Altered-Bolding &Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets.]

 *

  MARCH 24-2007

*

Brought -Forward from March 24-2007
 

 

Conservative skulduggery

BACK in 1972 -Tories desert to EU camp

SHORT-TERM SELF-INTEREST EXPLOITED

The UK Accession Bill passed its Third reading on 13th July 1972 by a majority of 17.

Earlier, the debate on the Second reading had lasted for four days (16-19 February,1972), with the Labour Party then officially committed to opposing the legislation. BUT, as happened with the Maastricht Bill two decades later, as Christopher Booker and Richard North observe, 'faced with the possible collapse of their Government, most of the Conservative 'anti-marketeers gritted their teeth' (treacherously, short-sighted and very foolishly -Ed.-Christopher Story) 'and walked through the 'aye' lobby. Despite that, 15 Tories voted with the Opposition. TRAITOR Edward Heath got his vote, but only by a water-thin margin:

309 to 301'.

The above result has had such catastrophic consequences 32 years later when Tony Blair signed the

New European Constitution

27 times and this before the referendum had taken place.

All matters concerning the

 ENGLISH CONSTITUTION

-should in future need at least three fourths vote to became law. But certain elements of our

CONSTITUTION

Should be inviolable and passed on to future generations

FOR EVER!

*

TEN TRUTHS OF THE LISBON TREATY.

*

100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

*

SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU?
 

 

 
 

WHAT FREDERICK FORSYTH STATED:

 

 

ONCE WE ARE FREE OF THE EU THE WORLD IS OUR OYSTER

 

 

It HAD to come sooner or later and now it has happened. A major national newspaper, the Daily Express, has called for Britain to end its full membership of the European Union.  Let us get two points clear.

 

1.   this does not mean severing our 1,000-year trading relationship with that continent.   trade is what we live by, always have.  Trade is what we were told 38 years ago was what would be freed and enhanced by joining the [EEC] European Economic Area.    Trade without tariffs, duties, taxes, protectionism and bureaucracy.

 

And we said YES.

 

We were lied to.  Heath lied to us.  They still do.  The EU of today and tomorrow

 

is not about trade

It is about the end of a nation state, replaced by a vast central governed empire.

For years this has been denied

[WHICH NEEDS ENGLAND TO PAY ITS BILLS OR IT WILL SOON BREAK-UP WHEN THE OTHERS ARE ASKED TO PAY THE EXTRA COST AND THEY WILL GREATLY  FEAR WHEN WE ARE FREE AGAIN! AS MR FORSYTH RIGHTLY STATED WITH THE WHOLE WORLD OUR OYSTER.]

 

Now it is very clearly out in the open.  But the huge majority of our people are deeply wedded to Old Blighty and refuse to abolish her by tricks and threat to become a devolved regional territory.

 

2.  Inside the European Economic Area like mega-rich Norway, we could trade and trade again with the EU and keep

our country, our laws, our justice system and our sovereignty.

 

And there are vast opportunities out there if only we had the nerve to face outwards not inwards.  Fifty-two nations of the Commonwealth want to increase trade, so does the Anglo-sphere: Ireland, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.  New giants are emerging: Brazil, India, China that make the EU look pathetic.

 

We must turn back to the open oceans whence our properity came. 

That world is growing, the Brussels world is shrinking slowly  dying

 

But the [intended] EEA would suit us fine.

David Cameron complains about us "banging on about Europe"

You're wrong David.

 We're banging on about Britain.

So should you.

 Too many millions of us are sick and tired of endless capitulation.  We do not feel we are a free people any more

So listen to us. We want to be free of the thralldom of Brussels.

 

-DAILY EXPRESS-NOV 26-2010

 *

 WE WERE THERE!

[Since the 'This England ' PETITION of 900,000 signatues increased to a million,to the Queen in 2004 by those indomitable PATRIOTS   RON and NIGEL MCWHIRTER and JOHN GOURIET who died at their posts fighting as TRUE PATRIOTS to the very the end for OUR FREEDOM-OUR CONSTITUTION - OUR COUNTRY. We were priviledged to be in their illustrious company at the rear of Buckingham Palace when the PETITION was delivered.]

*

ADDED-AUGUST-2014

JUST ONE THING!  before we celebrate the recent VICTORY of UKIP we are still hearing siren voices in August with the usual suggestion that the CON PARTY should DO A DEAL with UKIP when we have been informed constantly by traitorous party leaders for DECADES that they are looking to make CHANGE within the COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-CRIMINAL-UNDEMOCRATIC-RED TAPE MONSTROSITY going by the name of a supposed EUROPEAN UNION. With regard to the defection of a Conservative MP to UKIP and with the possibility of others joining we must SECURE from this NEW BLOOD that there will be NO DEALS and that the ONLY WAY TO STOP THE ROT is for David Cameron to announce a REFERENDUM before the GENERAL ELECTION in 2014.  Whatever happens it is ABSOLUTELY IMPORTANT that UKIP reminds ITSELF that they are NOW the ONLY HOPE there is of changing our polluted POLITICAL SYSTEM at WESTMINSTER more in line with the hopes and inspiration which were evident after the end of the SECOND WORLD WAR with GERMANY who has by CRAFT and CORRUPTION has replaced its HITLER REICH with a EUROPEAN GERMAN REICH which in sustance is what it is today in AUGUST 2014.

 AUGUST-2014

 

 

 

A REMINDER FROM JUNE  ,1962

 

‘I say we must not join Europe’-
Field Marshall Viscount Montgomery.

 

‘The intention is more than a Common Market- it is a political unity…

I stand for the British Commonwealth with our Queen at its head,’ - June 1962.

 

‘Wherever one goes in our country today the talk is all about the Common Market- should Britain go in, or should we stay out? Ministers in the government appear to be unable to explain clearly to us what it all really means!

 For myself, I have always been opposed to Britain joining the Common Market- mainly on military and strategic grounds, a side of the argument, which seems to have escaped the attentions of the government.

  Further, it is my opinion that if we bind ourselves irrevocably to Europe it will mean the end of the British Commonwealth. The greatest stabilizing factor in international affairs since the Roman Empire would then be wantonly cast away.

 

And what about our staunch friends in Canada, Australia and New Zealand who are united with us by kindred ties of blood and speech?   Their soldiers fought under my command in the battlefields of Africa and Europe, and many gave their lives in order that we might have the freedom of action our country now enjoys and that the Commonwealth might endure.

 Are we now to throw overboard our friends who came to our help in the crisis? Never!

Ministers tell us that Britain will join the Common Market if it can be done without damaging the Commonwealth. And they give us to understand that a way can be found which will satisfy all concerned; this is totally untrue.  Whatever Ministers may say, if we join the European Community it must have a damaging effect on the Commonwealth, and we are fooling ourselves if we think otherwise.

 Too many political personalities are trying to sit on the fence as long as possible, lacking the courage to come out into the open and say what the issue really is [June 1962].  For instance, the government is trying to get the best of both worlds- to join the Common Market and also preserve the Commonwealth undamaged.  It cannot be done, and the fact cannot be stated too often and too clearly.

The six nations, which signed the treaty of Rome in March 1957, are France, Germany, Italy, Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg.  A close association of these nations economically will undoubtedly strengthen Western Europe, which is all to the good.  But the treaty not only professes to encourage unity, it enforces unity.

 The intention behind the Rome Treaty is something more than the Common Market; there would be little point in the Treaty if that was to be all; the “ something more” is political unity, a Federation on the model of the USA.

 We could not possibly take part in that; it might well mean that we would have our laws for us by Europeans and not by our Parliament [June 1962] What a frightful idea!  For all the reasons I am utterly opposed to our nation joining the Common Market.

 I know very well all that has gone on in Europe since the war ended.  That experience, gained over many years of close association with the government of NATO, taught me that there is no true unity in Western Europe.  Too many of the nations are allies only in name; there is intense nationalism, and no nation is prepared to make any sacrifice of sovereignty for the common good of all.

 I know the European peoples well, and I like them exceedingly; but that is not to say that we should tie ourselves to them.  We most certainly should not. Federal Germany has today the most powerful army in Western Europe; when the French cease to be embarrassed by Algeria, they will come second; Britain would be so outnumbered on the Continent that our voice in military affairs would be overborne.

 At present we can deploy our armed forces about the world as our commitments dictate; but if we sign the Treaty of Rome the resultant emphasis on Europe would be the dominating factor; our freedom of action with regard to other Continents would be in grave danger. If we become part of a European Community we would be pledged willy-nilly to a common European strategy. And what would the result? I will tell you.

Our Bomber Command would be subject to orders from Europe. What might then become of the British nuclear deterrent?  Today, by special arrangement with NATO, we can deploy our fighter aircraft anywhere in the world; that flexibility would be in danger [as it would be today on the eve of St. George’s Day 22nd April 2004].

 Once we sign the Treaty of Rome, our armed forces, Navy, Army, Air Force, would be subordinated in a crisis to orders from Europe – orders given, maybe, by a German general, whose nation has disturbed the peace of the world twice during the past 48 years.

Are we to put up with all this? Never!    

 I stand for the British Commonwealth with our Queen at its head. But alas! it is not what it used to be when I was a boy. Let us then strengthen it; but will not do that by becoming entangled in the political system of Europe.

 

If the time should ever come when a third World War is fought between East and West, which God forbid, there is only one race under Heaven, which could stand, between the Western world and utter destruction in such a crisis. That is the race to which we belong – the British people- united by close ties of blood, speech and religion the world over.

 

Let us then keep clear of the Common market and the surrender of sovereignty, freedom of action, and military flexibility which membership would entail. We British are a great people; I often wonder what has come over us that we want to tie ourselves in with the nations of Continental Europe and chuck the Commonwealth overboard.

 

Let us continue to rely on our own strength and judgment. Let the Mother of Nations gather her children about her in obedience to the call of common kindred; do not let her cast away the affection of her offspring. Let her grasp the hand of her children and draw them closer to her – rather than desert them

Thus will the ancient heart be warmed and inspired – a heart, which is beating today just as firmly as ever it did in the days of

Trafalgar and El Alamein.

 *          *          *

http://eutruth.org.uk

[Added-February-2007]

 

 

 

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

In 1962,

Field Marshall Montgomery found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality  HITLER'S plan for Europe under GERMAN Control.

 

 

H F 41
 
 
DAILY MAIL

-MAIN BREXIT CONTRIBUTORS

JUNE 2016 JUL 2016 AUG 2016 SEP 2016 OCT 2016 NOV 2016 DEC 2016 JAN 2017 FEB 2017 MAR 2017 APL 2017 MAY 2017 JUNE 2017

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN

 		QUENTIN LETTS DOMINIC LAWSON ALEX BRUMMER NIGEL LAWSON
PETER OBORNE: TOM UTLEY  IAN Drury DOMINIC SANDBROOK

NICK BOLES
STEPHEN GLOVER JAMES FORSYTH

DANIEL MARTIN

 		JAMES SLACK

HUGO DUNCAN
PETER HITCHENS NIGEL FARAGE      
STEVE DOUGHTY JASON GROVES STEVE DOUGHTY TIM SCULTHORPE DANIEL HANNAN
 AND MANY OTHERS

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER 27-2016

H.F 1076-BREXIT NOW
 

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017