The Secret Government
[This will explain why there has been no
disclosure to the public of the traitorous activities of the RING of
TRAITORS from BALLIOL COLLEGE-OXFORD -Edward Heath - Roy Jenkins and
Geoffrey Ribbon whereas those CAMBRIDGE COMMUNISTS were EXPOSED.
*
EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED AS ILLEGAL
A criminalized organisation
Monday 10th
October, 2005- London.
THIS ILLEGAL ‘FESTERING DUSTBIN OF CORRUPTION’
TOMORROW
The European Union Collective is
illegal
and so extensively criminalized that it has become all but
indistinguishable from a criminal
organization.
It is
illegal
because
key EU treaties were procured by means of
slush fund payments.
It is
criminal
because, being born in corruption, its procedures are designed to mask the
corrupt activities of many of its officials, while it publishes false accounts.
Britain is
free to leave immediately, as explained below.
These findings are published today the 10th
October, 2005 in the latest issue of International Currency Review,
the London -based Journal of the International Financial Community.
·
The fraudulence of the European Commission’s accounts
necessitates urgent consideration of its Triple-A Credit Rating by the leading
Rating Agencies. Precise evidence of the fraudulence of the EC’s accounts is
presented in the issue. (Normally
this scandalous state of affairs is ‘successfully’ shoved under the carpet).
·
International Currency Review has advised the agencies
accordingly, and anticipates that they will carry out the necessary overdue
reassessment of the EU’s ‘integrity’. In the event that zero action is taken, given
the extreme gravity of the evidence of institutionalised accounting fraud
presented in the journal, the integrity
of the Credit Rating Agencies themselves may be called into question - not least by
International Currency Review.
This may have repercussions for the International
Financial Community generally.
*
WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS ILLEGAL AND ILLEGITIMATE
But first things first. The illegitimacy and illegality of the European
Union-and thus of ALL
its constituent structures, including the European Central Bank - arises from
the following facts:
The British Treaty of Accession was signed by two agents of the
German ‘Black’ Nazi intelligence continuum, DVD -This is
the ultra-secret German Nazi continuing ‘Black Operations’ intelligence
organisation based, appropriately enough, in Dachau, near Munich.
Intelligence concerning the existence was passed to the
Editor of International Currency Review: Christopher Story FRSA - Veteran UK financial and intelligence analyst
E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org Telephone +44-(0) 20-7222 3836
by
British intelligence sources
The
Editor then had its
contents checked out by high -level US intelligence contacts,
who confirmed the entity’s existence and importance.
There remains some uncertainty about what the initials
DVD stand for- alternatively Deutsche Versicherungs Dienst [German
Insurance Agency] or else Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst [German
Defence Agency]
- the context here being that DVD is the intelligence [Abwehr]
continuum of the
NAZI
INTERNATIONAL
Originally
established by the Nazi
Abwehr as the German Geopolitical Centre in
Madrid in 1942.
Therefore, in this context, ‘insurance’ would mean
‘insurance’ would mean ‘insuring the
continuity of Nazi global hegemony strategy for the controlling
a
Thousand-Year Reich.’
While ‘defence’ in this same context would mean
‘defending’ the continuing covert Nazi global hegemony strategy.
DVD
is not funded by the German Government and Taxpayer, since
it operates its own covert sources of giga-finance;
but its primary operations and strategy are routinely approved by the
German Chancellery.
Any official denial of this fact is a lie
To continue:
The signatories, both - of The British treaty of
Accession whom received substantial financial rewards for
their ‘co-operation’, were Edward Heath
and Geoffrey Rippon. Together
with the late Roy Jenkins, they were
recruited by the German Abwehr while studying at Balliol College, Oxford.
This intelligence has emerged since the recent death of Sir Edward
Heath [Another Traitor amongst many who have
been honoured by the Queen with a title]
*
THE E.U. TREATIES ARE ROUTINELY PROCURED BY FRAUDULENT MEANS:
That is to say, official signatories and senior
policymakers/operatives have received substantial corrupt payments, remitted to
their secret offshore bank accounts, in exchange for their ‘co-operation’ in
pushing through successive E.U. Treaties.
The bribery funds are derived from a colossal secret ‘Black
Operations’ slush fund account located in Switzerland -the
title and size of which is divulged in the REPORT.
For instance:
$5.0 billion was allocated in 2004 from the secret Swiss slush fund
to ‘procure’ the European
Constitution Treaty, divided into two branches:
1)
$2.5 billion was allocated (and paid out) on completion of the Inter
Governmental Conference [IGC], in July/August of 2004, with $100 million
allocated for each of the 25 EU’Member States’. The corrupt bribery funds were
remitted to the National officials concerned in Euros.
2)
A further $2.5 billion ($100 million for
each ‘Member State’) was payable on ratification of the Collective Treaty.
Given the negative
referendum results delivered by the French and Dutch electorates, payment of the
second branch has been a matter of understandable tension and contention ever
since, not least since such ‘Black’ remittances,
which are common place at the intergovernmental level are illegal -and therefore
‘never happened’.
Intelligence
sources have provided International Currency Review with the NAME of the secret
Swiss bank account, the vast amount of ‘Black’ money it holds, the amounts
allocated for each corrupted EU ‘Member
State’, plus the names of three of the most prominent alleged recipients of ‘Black’ payments, together with details of
the alleged transactions concerned.
[WE DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK BUT THIS REPORT MUST PUT THE
PRO-EUROPE FACTION LITERALLY IN A SPIN AND FEAR OF THE OUTCOME WHEN THE
CONSPIRACY IS FULLY REVEALED]
We have more to
follow
*
EXPOSURES TRIGGERED BY THE DEATH OF
SIR EDWARD HEATH
More!
These
revelations have become possible following the death of
Sir Edward Heath, who was a
German agent and asset for six decades -
the longest known foreign intelligence
penetration in modern history.
It is
significant that the
extensive Obituary of Heath published in the
Guardian
on 18th
July 2005, closed with the cryptic sentence:
‘He [Heath] remained determined that he would be vindicated,
until
close to the end.
This referred to the fact that when Heath visited Salzburg in
2003, ostensibly to attend the Music Festival there, the real reason for his
visit was that he had been summoned to Dachau, where DVD officers
warned him that
British intelligence were intending to confront him with his treachery.
It is reported that, on hearing this, Heath literally ‘blew a fuse’: he suffered
a pulmonary embolism.
A similar fate attended the demise of the late Roy (Lord) Jenkins who
suffered a severe heart attack when confronted by intelligence officials with
the fact that he was about to be exposed for his long-term treachery against the
United Kingdom.
Roy Jenkins was one of the most
lethal of all long-term German agents operating at the highest levels of the
British Government.
And
-the present allegedly deeply
compromised Tony Blair is the late Lord Jenkins’ protégé.
Heath, Rippon and Jenkins
were far from being the only long-term. High-level foreign penetrations by the
DVD-the successor ‘Black’ (continuing Nazi) intelligence organisation to the
Abwehr.
In the United States, the Dulles brothers were German
agents to this day. Substantial
transfers of ‘Black’ Operations’ funds
originally controlled by the United States authorities are known to have been
transferred into the hands of the German ‘Black’ covert intelligence community. The CIA is
belatedly being to some extent purged of operators with ethnic and other
loyalties and ties to Germany.
TENSIONS
EXIST WITHIN INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES
BECAUSE OF THIS PENETRATION
*
THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES.
Given
that
(a)
The United Kingdom’s
EEC Accession Treaty,
(b)
The Maastricht Treaty of 1992 and
(c)
The (aborted) European Constitution Treaty were
among E.U. bilateral and collective Treaties that were procured by corrupt and
fraudulent means,
THE EUROPEAN UNION IS AN ILLEGAL
ORGANISATION.
This is because Article 49 of the 1969
Vienna Convention on Treaties, to which Britain and the other EU
‘Member States’ are parties, provides as follows:
‘If a State has been induced to conclude a Treaty by the fraudulent conduct of
another negotiating State, that State may invoke the fraud as invalidating its
consent to be bound by the Treaty.
[* The first tranche of corrupt payments for the European
Constitution Treaty was paid out, but the fate of the second tranche, given the
negative French and Dutch referenda outcomes, is uncertain - as well as being
the subject of vicious secret controversy]
According to intelligence sources, earlier EU Collective
treaties were likewise procured by fraudulent means.
In the British case, UK Membership of the
European Union Collective -an illegal organisation which exists to subsume,
usurp and collectivise national sovereignty under the enticing cover of ‘co-operation’ (code for collectivisation)-contravenes
the
1689
Bill of Rights
which remains the LAW of the United Kingdom
to this day and which incorporates the following Oath:
‘I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate,
state or potentate hath or ought to have jurisdiction, power, superiority,
pre-eminence or authority with this Realm’
*
WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION
In addition to exposing the illegality and illegitimacy of the
European Union as a whole,
International Currency Review
[Volume 30, Number
4] demonstrates, with extensive analysis and documentation, that
the European
Commission is a criminal organisation.
The issue has been prepared in close collaboration with Ashley Mote,
-Independent MEP for Southeast England, [www.ashleymote.co.uk] and Continental
MEP colleagues. In October
2004, Mr Mote and Marta Andreason, the former Chief Accountant of the European
Commission, presented the UK Serious Fraud Office with two large lever-arch
files containing voluminous damning information about institutionalised
corruption in the EU Commission and related EU structures.
NO ACTION WAS TAKEN
[Does the stink of corruption in high places prevent the Rule of Law from taking
place?]
Among the reasons for concluding that
the European Union is a criminal organisation, are the following:
1)
Because successive Presidents of the European
Union preside over the disbursement of the corrupt ‘Black’
‘facilitation fees’ identified, each successive (six-monthly) President
is and has been aware of the corrupt mechanism used to procure the EU’s
successive collective Treaties.
2)
The incidence of fraud committed within the EU’s structures is so
extensive and routine, that the European Commission has been condemned as openly
condoning a ‘culture of corruption’, and presiding over a system of
‘institutional looting’. Scandalised EC whistle blowing officials refer to the European Commission as a
‘festering dustbin of corruption’. In
2004, there were nearly 3,500 cases of EC fraud.
3)
When informed in 2004 that the EC Vice -
President-designate, Jacques Barrot, had been convicted for
embezzlement of funds, and had withheld this information from the European
Commission’s President-designate, Sr. Jose-Manuel Barroso, the new
President denied any prior knowledge of this fact, and left Barrot in
place.
4)
It is nothing unusual for European Commission
officials to be associated with lucrative corrupt ‘side businesses’-often
using offshore accounts-from which they benefit financially, consequent upon
contracts being awarded to the businesses in
which they themselves have a secret pecuniary interest.
For instance:
5)
The Sunday Telegraph reported on 25th
September -2005 that two EC employees own a Brussels sex hotel, Studio Europe,
which rents out rooms for 13 euros an hour. No doubt this location is used for
blackmail purposes. The EC officials in
question were named as Carmela lo Guidance, an assistant in the EC
Budget Directorate-General and George Tizzies a porter in the
Directorate-General responsible for employment. This is the latest of innumerable EC scandals to have erupted into
the public domain, some of which are examined in the Special Issue [out
on Monday 10th October 2005.]
6)
Unhealthy and evidently pervasive masonic links
exist between European Commission officials and contractors, resulting in
corrupt and unhealthy ‘business relationships’.
7)
The European Commission’s accounting is NOT only shambolic, but also
fraudulent. Evidence to this effect is presented,
inter alia, by the well-known British forensic accountant Christopher Arkell,
FTCA, and by former Chief Accountant of the European Commission,
Marta Andreason. She was
‘suspended’ after five months en poste, and then fired, after she
questioned the legitimacy of payments that
Directorates-General required her to authorise. She asked awkward questions, and was
effectively told to
‘shut up and just sign’.
8)
The EC’s accounting irregularities, which are glaring, include the
following abuses:
When
certain accounting modifications were implemented at the end of 2004, the
closing balances in 2004 and the opening balances in 2005 were not
reconciled- thereby permanently embedding false accounting data for the
future. This
means that henceforth no European Commission accounts can ever be accurate (not
that this has ever been the case).
en though EU ‘Member States’ have been making payments to the
Commission for decades to cover the costs of pension liabilities for
approximately 39,000 EC employees (as of 2005), the EU ‘Member States’ have
simultaneously been charged with the liability of making/guaranteeing the
resulting pension payments. Thus pension liabilities appear on both sides of the balance
sheet. Proper
accounting practice would require a charge to the Income and Expenditure Account
of
EUR 19.5 billion
And a consequent reduction in reserves.
The European Commission should have been acquiring a liability for pensions
throughout its existence instead of fudging the accounts in this fraudulent and
irregular manner.
The European Commission ‘makes’ massive surpluses out of the ‘Member States’
annually, which it covers up
Surpluses are supposed according to the EU’s own
regulations, to be returned to the ‘Member States’.
What happens in practice is that the EC surpluses that have arisen after all
accruals have been accounted for, are eliminated by the simple manipulative
expedient of providing for potential expenditures not openly through the
Income and Expenditure Account, but by means of corrupt adjustments to the
Balance Sheet (‘Provisions’).
This method of accounting is prohibited by all recognised
accounting standards around the world as DISHONEST.
Its use by the European Commission
represents a clear fraud perpetuated upon ‘Member States’
and their
troubled and exploited peoples.
EC accounting records can be changed two or more
years in arrears. The
amount and the payee, but not the unique identifying number, can be altered, and
no record whatsoever of such changes is/has been maintained in the records. This
represents an open-ended invitation to scam the system, especially as it is
routine for the EC’s Annual Accounts to be adjusted retrospectively.
The huge Eurocracy (or
self-interested EU nomenklatura) has perfected subtle
mechanisms
for ensuring that hardly anything is ever done to stamp
out the corruption over which it has presided for decades. These techniques include, but are not confined to the
following:
The use of ‘candour’,
which is NOT to be confused with the truth. ‘Candour’ is
deployed in order to disarm, mislead, divert and mollify critics, so that any underlying fraud goes undetected.
The ‘multiple investigations’ technique
8.2) What
happens is that several investigations are ‘opened’ separately. Further internal ‘investigations’ may
follow. Some are then ‘closed’,
or ‘suspended’, ostensibly
‘pending’ the ‘results’ of other investigations.
The resulting, deliberately contrived, confusion, with successive reports
contradicting others, ensures that the corruption trail is buried and lost.
Report-writing is used to smother transparency, clarity,
and TRUTH, with the sole objective of obfuscating the underlying looting and
corruption.
8.3) The EC and its structures have at least
3,094 secret ‘working groups’
or committees,
all of which are answerable to no-one, and the operations
of which are secret.
8.4)
The main objective of any EC fraud investigation
is to procure that the case is ‘exported’ as quickly as possible to the ‘Member
States’ concerned, so that any corruption at the EC centre is consequently
hidden from scrutiny.
8.5)
Wherever possible, investigations are kept
unresolved until the existing Commission is duly replaced by its successor-when the ‘that was then, this is now’ excuse kicks in.
8.6)
Innumerable other deliberate obstruction methods,
identified by International Currency Review
with the guidance of Ashley Mote MEP and his colleagues, are routinely employed
by the EC and related structures, to maximise the obfuscation of troubling
problems.
For instance, one external corporation, based in
Luxembourg, in which EC officials had an interest, was ostensibly
established on
29th February 1989-a date
which never even existed, which meant that the entity was
‘invisible’.
When a sanitised official report on the entity’s
fraudulent activities was presented to the former President of the European
Commission, Signor Romano Prodi - that allegedly corrupt Italian ‘machine’
politician- the date was altered to
22nd
February 1989.
This further illustrated the
devious standard European Commission technique of promulgating conflicting
information in separate contradictory reports.
By this means, controversy is deflected into sterile arguments over the
conflicting information-diverting attention from the institutionalised internal
looting itself.
8.7)
The European Court of Auditors
has given an adverse opinion for many years, on 95% of all European Commission
Expenditure.
It has never, ever, approved the EC’s accounts.
Furthermore evidence has surfaced of fraud in the Court’s
own accounts -one of several indications that the Court itself cannot be
trusted. Indeed, like the Commission’s
own internal Audit Service, its main task, by open official admission, is to
minimise embarrassment to the Commission.
The damning
evidence of institutionalised European Commission looting and serial corruption
covered up by the EC authorities contained in the single issue of
International
Currency Review is sufficient to induce a terminal crisis at the European
Commission.
*
WHY BRITISH PAYMENTS TO THE EC MUST CEASE FORTHWITH.
Both Ashley Mote MEP and the journal’s Editor, Christopher Story,
demand that the UK Treasury sits up, finally takes notice, and withholds further
contributions to the EC budget pending elimination of institutionalised
corruption and looting in the European Commission’s structures -which will never happen.
In a letter to Ashley Mote dated 22nd
October 2004, Stephen Timms, the Treasury Minister, told the MEP that
withholding British payments to the EC would be illegal and would be an
‘option’ we would not consider’
BUT
Continued squandering of UK Taxpayers (OUR MONEY)
represents a dereliction by British Ministers and their officials, of their duty
of care towards UK taxpayer’s funds.
Given the conspicuous gravity of the situation, Ministers
are believed to be increasing the risk of being sued for negligence as exposures
of the European Commission’s ‘culture of corruption’ proliferate.
[At this moment in Time in the UK millions of
people on tax-credits who were overpaid because of technical problems are being
asked to hand the money back. They
should ALL insist that the Treasury should try the European
Commission and ask their employees to point the finger and explain were the
billions of pounds of OUR money is resting in banks in Switzerland. WE should
certainly have a great deal of compound interest to collect at the same time]
Moreover the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord
Lawson of Blaby, has advised the House of Lords’ European Committee that the
British Government DOES possess the legal scope to give itself
powers to withhold payments to the European
Commission.
He told the Committee:
‘You have to remember how hard it was to win the (UK)
rebate…It would never have happened if we had not made clear that if we did not
get satisfaction, we would withhold our contributions.
It was never published, but it was printed. It was
discreetly known to those who we negotiated with, that this is what would happen
if we did not get satisfaction….Without that threat to withhold our
contributions, to the extent of having the UK law officers produce a bill, we
would have NOT got [the Rebate].’
[Source: Future Financing of the European Union,
House of Lords European Committee, HL Paper 62, 9th March 2005.]
But since Britain’s EU membership
is illegal, because the UK Accession Treaty and successive EU Collective
Treaties (notably Maastricht) were procured by fraud, it is not even technically
necessary for the Government to extract that draft bill from the official
pigeon-hole into which it was shoved.
*
BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EUROPEAN
UNION TOMORROW: NO PROBLEM.
The Government can walk away from the European Union
Tomorrow- and use the 25% of gross Domestic Product represented by all
current and future costs of the EU membership:
To rebuild the Public
Transportation system.
Build spanking new ‘Schools and
Hospitals’ wherever demand exists.
And revitalise the BRITISH economy
generally.
All without suffering any losses
since EU membership has brought Britain no clear benefits at all, that could not
have been procured domestically. It has
however, meant that billions of UK taxpayers’ funds that the British Government
should have been spending at home, have been squandered on this sterile,
decaying collectivist project, led by corrupted and blackmailed politicians and
operatives.
All EU ‘Member States’, valuing the huge British
market for their goods, would be compelled to negotiate arms’-length bilateral
trade and other agreements with the United Kingdom, or risk losing access to UK
markets. Any prospective interim disruptions could be accommodated by the
British Government directing the UK taxpayers’ funds that it normally squanders
with the EC’s ‘festering dustbin of corruption’, into temporarily
vulnerable sectors of the UK economy.
A Free Trade Agreement linking Britain, the United States
and Canada has bee readied, for implementation when Britain leaves the European
Community.
For, contrary to what is in the public domain, contingency
plans do exist in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union.
These were
recently reviewed and ‘dusted down’, in the context of key connections made by
certain intelligence circles following the 7/7 attacks, which have shown that EU
Member States’ that profess to be allies of the United Kingdom
are anything but.
Exposure
information for this special issue of
International Currency Review
[Vol.30, No4] has been developed with the generous practical assistance
of Ashley Mote MEP. Paul van Buitenen
MEP, Marta Andreason, Christopher Arkle FTCA and the US and UK intelligence
sources special to the Editor, Christopher
Story.
For further details, see
Ashley Mote’s website: www.ashleymote.co.uk.
International Currency Review,
VOL. 30 NO 4
[extracts from 153 pages -shown above], available by subscription from
www.worldreports.org. was mailed to paying subscribers
worldwide on
10th October 2005
Banks,
Corporations and other entities that use subscription agencies may subscribe to
World Reports Ltd serials (complete) through their usual channels, or else
direct from our website, or from the London or New York addresses shown in the
lower red panel on the
www.worldreports.org
Home Page. The website has a secure and reliable
subscription ordering system.
ABOUT
INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW
International Currency Review
is the only
INDEPENDENT
global journal
specialising in international currency, financial and economic issues with a
geopolitical and intelligence dimension.
Published since 1969,
it specialises today in exposing corruption in governance structures, since the
corruption of governance and of the capitalist system is swamping all other
considerations.
The Journal is one
of a series of intelligence sources published by World Reports, details of which
will be found on our website:
www.worldreports.org
International Currency Review
has recently exposed the basis of the ‘Upper Echelon’global
financial structure, which sustains the ‘Lower Echelon’ structure with which we
are all familiar.
The ‘Upper
Echelon’ is a ‘closed’ intergovernmental and intelligence financial
environment characterised by high -yield investment programmes, scamming
operations and colossal stored fiat wealth running into trillions of dollars
[Font
altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]
* * *
OCTOBER 10-2005
Also
AVAILABLE SOON
THE NEW
UNDERWORLD ORDER
*Published
by: EDWARD HARLE LTD
(Source of ‘politically
incorrect’
intelligence books.
108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, LONDON SW1P 2EF
Orders@edwardharle.com . Tel-Orderline +44
[0207-222-2635
*
