ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

*
SEPT FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017 - (1994 -Official Website - SEPT- PT2-2017 )-- SEPTFREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE
AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF THE BEAST IN BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE TRAITOROUS EDWARD HEATH WILL BE RETURNED IN MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

*

ENGLAND'S

GREAT ESCAPE

 FROM

HITLER'S  FOURTH REICH

See also: eutruth.org.uk-Why we are leaving!-if you need a reminder?

*

 

SEPTEMBER FREEDOM NOW-PART 2

BULLETINS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

 

 
 

A CALL FOR UNITY

 

WE SHOULD NOT BE SUPPORTING HITLER'S PLANNED UNDEMOCRATIC SOON TO BE

SUPER-STATE

EVERY£ WE GIVE THIS INSATIABLE BEAST KEEPS IT IN BEING

IT IS AN EVIL ENTITY WHICH IF IT SHOULD REMAIN IN BEING WILL BECOME A THREAT NOT ONLY TO ITS MEMBERSHIP BUT THE WORLD AT LARGE.

MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ARE TRAPPED WITHIN THIS MONSTER WHO WISH TO BE FREE WITH THEIR OWN COUNTRY-LAW AND CUSTOM AS THE STEEL CURTAIN IS RAISED ON MANY BORDERS.

THIS MODERN TOWER OF BABEL OF EVIL INTENTION AND DESIGN MUST BE ERADICATED FROM THE FACE OF THE WORLD OR IT WILL REMAIN  A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY EVERYWHERE.

OUR HISTORY IN MODERN TIMES HAS SHOWN THAT ENGLAND HAS BROUGHT INTO BEING NATION STATES AS TODAY WE SEE IN EUROPE THE RENEWED CLAMOUR FOR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY.

OUR POLITICAL PARTIES SHOULD BE UNITED TO OFFER THAT ASSISTANCE TO THOSE ACROSS OUR SOON RETURNED ENGLISH CHANNEL.

LET US ALL STAND TOGETHER TO ERADICATE THE THREAT TO THE PEOPLES OF THE EU  TO ENSURE THAT THEY WILL AGAIN LIVE IN FREE NATION STATES FOR THE BETTERMENT OF MANKIND.

 THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE [ 26 Bulletins]  .

*

SEPTEMBER,26-2017

H.F.1326
 

WHY WE SHOULD WALK AWAY FROM

EUROPE

News for DAILY MAIL-STEPHEN GLOVER: Why we should walk away from Europe.

SEPTEMBER 28,2017.

 

The more I see of the EU's rude (and unelected) bullies, the more I yearn for us to call their bluff and walk away.

NOT long ago I resigned from a club I had joined a quarter of a century  earlier. The Secretary thanked me politely for having been a member and wished me all the best in the future,

There were no threats or insults and certainly no demand to go on paying a share of the costs of the club-rent, rates and the pension obligations of staff-after I had gone.

Leaving the European Union is a different matter. Not only are we expected to continue paying our portion of the future pension liabilities (which may be as much as a ransom payment of untold billions, we are also being constantly lectured to and harried and abused by Brussels panjandrums.

I've no doubt millions of my fellow countrymen share my amazement at the tone of these admonishments which resembles that of a strident ill-tempered teach dressing down an incorrigibly disobedient pupil.

The extraordinary thing is that while our accusers are unremittingly rude and overbearing towards us, our own negotiators led by Brexit secretary David Davis are unfailingly well-mannered and accommodating.

 The most risible of the EU bovver boys is Jean-Claude Juncker  , President of the European Commission. Last March, he boasted that no other country would want to leave the EU having seen how harshly Britain had been punished.

From the more sinuous and intelligent Michael Barnier, the EU's chief negotiator, we have had multiple threats. Earlier this month, he said he wanted to use Brexit to 'teach the British people and others

WHAT LEAVING THE EU MEANS.

Only last week, in a characteristically terse and charmless intervention, he insisted that Britain produce its Brexit proposals 'as soon as this week'. I marvel that Mr Davis can keep his cool under such provocation.

Then there is the irascible Guy Verhofstadt, the European Parliament's man in the talks, who endlessly chides the Government. He declared its plan was 'not serious, fair or even possible given the negotiating time remaining'. British politicians needed 'to be more honest about the complexities Brexit creates'.

Another member of the gang is Donald Tusk, President of the EU Council. In an unusually constructive statement on Tuesday, he said he was 'cautiously optimistic' about the progress of talks. But he then spoilt it all by insisting there was 'not sufficient progress yet' to begin discussions over a trade deal.

By that he means the EU sets the agenda and timetable for talks, not us. Brussels high-handedly refuses to discuss post-Brexit trade arrangements until the Government has agreed to a ransom payment, and offered acceptable safeguards about the legal status of EU citizens in Britain and the border between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic.

Let me observe in passing that, with the exception of Mr Verhofstadt, none of these gentlemen has been elected to their powerful jobs. And yet they treat our own elected representatives — from Theresa May downwards — with less grace than is due an incompetent parish councillor.

Isn't it a strange sort of negotiation when one side continually threatens or abuses the other while maintaining that it, and it alone, has the right to decide how talks between the two parties should proceed? Needless to say, I find it is highly offensive that a respectable, law-abiding and hardly negligible sovereign state should be intimidated in this way by a bunch of mostly unelected Eurocrats.

But even more than feeling anger, I am grieved by this aggression. Despite deciding to leave the EU — and what a peremptory and arrogant organisation it is in the hands of Barnier and his intemperate colleagues — we are part of Europe, and wish to remain friends with all its countries.

History seems to count for nothing in the minds of these bullies. Have they forgotten how, more than seven decades ago, Britain impoverished itself, and sacrificed hundreds of thousands, in helping to restore freedom to the European continent?

And throughout the Cold War, British troops in Germany played a leading role in defending Western Europe against the threat of a Soviet invasion.

There may be no such thing as abiding gratitude in the affairs of nations. Yet the absence of even a few tattered remnants of respect or affection in these supercilious bureaucrats is shocking.

I can understand that they may have been hurt and bewildered by our decision to leave, and they should feel that their plan for a united Europe has been imperilled.

But there is no justification — after the horrific history of the last century, when this country bled itself for the freedom of Europe in two world wars — for the constant rebukes, and the imprecations of punishment.

A punishment, moreover, which if delivered would damage EU countries at least as much as us, since they enjoy a considerable trade surplus with Britain, which post-Brexit will be the European Union's biggest trading partner.

The truth is that until this moment the Government has played the game entirely on the EU's terms — accepting their agenda instead of our own, and absorbing their brickbats without complaint or hint of retaliation.

But if the European Union continues to be stubbornly unreasonable after Mrs May's conciliatory speech in Florence last Friday, the Government should consider breaking off negotiations and, as the leading Eurosceptic Iain Duncan Smith puts it, 'call the EU's bluff on trade'.

In their infuriatingly schoolmasterly way, EU leaders will consider at their summit in just over three weeks whether 'sufficient progress' has been made on talks for them to allow all-important trade negotiations to go ahead.

If their answer is 'No', the Government should walk away for the time being in order to let the repercussions of the EU's domineering approach sink in. It may begin to dawn on them that they have at least as much, if not more, to lose.

According to an entirely plausible report by researchers at Belgium's University of Leuven which was published earlier this week, in the event of there being no agreement, and Britain reverting to World Trade Organisation tariffs, the EU would lose more than twice as many jobs as this country.

They reckon the return of tariffs to goods and services would cost just over half a million British jobs, and more than 1.2 million jobs in the remaining 27 EU states.


   I hope there will be a deal, but not at the expense of this country being humiliated at every turn, and forced to stump up an extortionate amount of money in return for access to the single market.

The more that I see of the EU and its institutions, the gladder I am that we are leaving this dysfunctional club. I'm sure the rudeness and bullying of overmighty EU bureaucrats will have confirmed most Leavers in their views, and converted not a few Remainers.

In a mammoth speech on Tuesday extolling the virtues of a united Europe — despite most Europeans not wanting such an eventuality — President Macron of France suggested that Britain might want to re-join a reinvigorated EU.

It's kind of him to think of us but, on the basis of the appalling record of Brussels satraps over the past few months, it is an offer we will just have to refuse.

Full article.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4927738/STEPHEN-GLOVER-walk-away-Europe.html#ixzz4u4Y6RfYR
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

SEPTEMBER 28,2017

 

H.F.1328 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO DEMANDS OF THE HITLERITE EU

 
THERESA MAY'S SURRENDER

 TO

HITLER'S EU

IN

SEPTEMBER 2017

 IS REMINISCENT

OF

PRIME MINISTER NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN'S

LACK OF GRIT

IN

1938

WHICH LED TO WORLD WAR 11

 IN SEPTEMBER 1939

AS THEN WE HAVE THE PHONEY WAR AND THE

BATTLE FOR BRITAIN.

What would those who died protecting our skies in 1940 think of the GREAT BETRAYAL by fellow citizens to their FOE of TWO WORLD WARS-

GERMANY

IN 2017 WE haven't  even had our Dunkirk as we haven't in reality even crossed the Channel in real earnest to claim our FREEDOM after 12 months since a majority voted for the return of THEIR COUNTRY LAW-CUSTOM- given away by TRAITORS in 1972.

BEING IN THE UNDERBELLY OF EUROPE WON'T HELP ONE IOTA!-GERMANY IS ADJUDICATOR!

WE HAVE STALEMATE!

THE ANSWER IS TO BOYCOTT GOODS FROM FRANCE AND GERMANY WHO ARE THE DRIVER AND FIREMAN OF THE EU EXPRESS.

WE BUY MORE FROM EUROPE THAN THEY BUY FROM US!

BUSINESSES IN THE MAIN  SUPPORT THE EU

WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A WAR OF SORTS!

REMEMBER!

WE ARE NOT DEALING WITH A DEMOCRATIC BODY BUT WITH THE HITLERITE -AUTOCRATIC EU

*
 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

***

TREASON

 

 

 

WE

*

 

In November 2005 we put the following bulletin on our EDP WEBSITE

H.F.1321 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S EU
 
 

BRITAIN AND EUROPE

The Culture of Deceit

by

Christopher Booker

 

*

PART  3

HEATH and 1970

[The Great Conspiracy]

 By the time Mr Heath came to launch his own, successful application to 'enter Europe' in 1970, he was already well versed in how to pretend that it was something other than what it was. Over the next five years, up to the time of the referendum in 1975, Parliament and the British people were incessantly assured that entry into the Common Market was simply a matter of trade and jobs, in no way would the British way of life be changed or Britain's right to srun her own affairs curtailed.

[At the referendum  In 1975 we voted NO!]

An oft-quoted line from Mr Heath's White Paper circulated to every household in the country in June 1971 promised

'there is no question of Britain losing essential sovereignty".

This from the same man who before his death in 2005 admitted to the British people that he had lied because he believed it was what should happen .He failed to let them know that he  Rippon and others were Nazi-spys since 1938-detailed HERE!

In a television broadcast to mark Britain's entry in January 1973, Heath said:

"there are some in this country who fear that in going into Europe we shall in some way sacrifice independence and sovereignty.  These fears, I need hardly say, are completely injustified"

YET SHORTLY AFTER Parliament had approved British entry, word came from Paris that President Pompidou was proposing that member states should make a solemn commitment to

"move irrevocably to economic and monetary union by 1980".

This made a complete mockery of all the assurances given to Parliament that any plans for monetary union had been dropped.  In a BBC documentary series The Poisoned Chalice in 1996, Sir Douglas-Home looking askance at the news. He said to Heath

"the House isn't going to like this"."But that" Denman recalled Heath replying, "is what it's all about". When Heath himself was asked by the BBC whether he could really have said such a thing, his only response, after an unsmiling pause, was

 "well, that's what it was about"..

Another revealing measure of how deeply the

CULTURE OF DECEIT

had now set in was the curious story of the common fisheries policy, and the Heath Government's response to the crude ambush set up by the Six to ensure that, as part of 

THE PRICE OF ENTRY

the four applicant countries Britain, Iceland, Denmark and Norway, would have to hand over to the community their fishing waters, the richest in the world. (all documents cited on the CFP are from PRO files in FO [FOREIGN OFFICE] 30/656-9)

On the very day the applications went in, June 30 1970, the Six hastily approved the principle that member-states should be given "equal access" to each other's fishing waters, under Brussels control. The point was that, because this had now become part of the acquis communautairte, the body of existing Community law, ythe applicant countries would have to accept a fait accompli. Within a few years, as everyone knew, national fishing waters were due to be extended out under international law to 200 miles. Because the waters belonging to the four applicants states would then contain most of the fish in European waters, this would give the SIX an astonishing prize.

In fact the Six knew that their new fisheries policy

WAS NOT LEGAL.

Among Foreign Office papers released in 2001 was an internal Council of Ministers document, dating from June 1970, which shows how desperate the Brussels lawyers had been to find some article in the

TREATY of ROME

 which could be used to authorise such a policy.

THERE WERE NONE.

The policy therefore had

NO LEGAL JUSTIFICATION,

and other papers show that the

'FOREIGN OFFICE'

KNEW THIS TOO.

[Since the sixties under Macmillan and Heath and since with the late exception of Margaret Thatcher who paid for her late conversion with 'NO!-NO!-NO! to closer union the so-called British Foreign Office was and still is with David Cameron in reality under the control of  BRUSSELS.]

But so determined was Mr Heath not to offend his prospective new partners that he decided

NOT TO CHALLENGE [THE LEGALITY OF] THEM.

Britain would simply accept the

ILLEGAL NEW FISHERIES POLICY

even though this would mean handing over

ONE OF THE GREATEST RENEWABLE ASSETS AND WOULD SPELL DISASTER FOR A LARGE PART OF HER FISHING FLEET.

Gradually the British fishermen got the idea that they were about to be

SACRIFICED

and in the closing months of 1970 various MPs for fishing constituences wrote to ministers asking what on earth was going on. They were fobbed off with evasive replies. In deed, as the recently released papers show

[ In 2001 under the 30 year rule-Public Records Office-Kew- re Heath's application to join the supposed Common Market but really a

politically based Super-state

 to be known as the

 European Union.

civil servants eventually worked out a careful form of words

[As they will  in February 2016]

intended to to reassure the fishermen that

'" proper account would be taken of their interests".

BUT

behind the scenes,

as a Scottish Office memo put it on November 9-1970

ministers were being told how important it was -not to get drawn into detailed explanations of just what problems might lie ahead for the fishermen because,

"in a wider UK context, they must be regarded as expendable."

 

The following year the White Paper promised that Britain would not sign an ACCESSION TREATY until the Common Market's fisheries policy was changed. Geoffrey Ribbon [a Nazi Spy  with Edward Heath and Roy Jenkins recruited by German (Nazi) intelligence part of of a spy cell in Balliol College in 1938-reported to MI5 by the MASTER

A. D. LINDSAY]

Rippon repeated this PROMISE to PARLIAMENT and to the TORY PARTY Conference.

But in November Mr Heath realised that time was running out.  Unless he accepted the fishing policy as it stood, his plans for Britain's entry in January 1973 would have to be abandoned.

He instructed Rippon to give way, and when Rippon was questioned about this in the House of Commons on December 13, 1972

HE ANSWERED WITH A STRAIGHT LIE.

He claimed Britain had retained complete control over the waters round her coastline, knowing that this was simply

NOT TRUE.

So barefaced was this

DECEIT

over fishing rights that successive government and fisheries ministers would continue to obfuscate the truth.

[TELL DAMN LIES]

of what had been done for the next

THREE DECADES

In June 1975, the month when inflation hit 27 percent,

ITS HIGHEST LEVEL IN HISTORY

came the

REFERENDUM

Surropunded by all the evidence of a

MAJOR ECONOMIC CRISIS,

[THE GREATLY MISLED AND LIED TO]

BRITISH PEOPLE

VOTED BY 2 to 1

TO REMAIN IN A

[SUPPOSED]

"COMMON MARKET"

which the vast majority believed was intended to be no more than a free-trading area arrangement'

The supporters of the YES! campaign, including the leaderships of all  three political parties [AS again in 2016] did little to disillusion them.  The message was that a 'YES' vote was all about protecting jobs [As yet again in 2016] and Prosperity', offering the lifeline Britain's ailing economy required.  As for any fears that there might be moves towards "an Economic andn Monetary Union" and "fixed exchange rates for the pound", the Wilson Government's own leaflet to every household promised categorically

" this threat has been removed".

END

 

 

*  *  *

 

[WE VOTED IN 1975 TO LEAVE THE NAZI-PLANNED

SUPERSTATE

AND  WE ARE STILL FIGHTING THIS NAZI ABOMINATION TODAY IN FEBRUARY 2016.

[Unfortunately even after 41 years we are still hearing the pathetic plea that we cannot LEAVE THE EU because that is where the business is. The last individual we spoke to a few days ago a technician with a mind to match could not understand that we would NOT be leaving EUROPE-THEY NEED US- but the

COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-UNDEMOCRATIC-EUROPEAN UNION

[What you are hearing from the lips of pro-EU ministers today in 2016 are the same LIES and DECEIT of 1972/3 and 1975 and ever since. We have even heard yet again about the 3million job loses -an interview on Channel 4 on February 16 -a pro-EU  minister struggling to find any constructive facts to support his pitiful view. From what we hear about Robots taking over millions of jobs in the future. The Government should be encouraging as many people particularly those who have no intention in ever integrating into our society but hope to bring about a ISLAMIC STATE to return to their natural habitat as soon as possible. It  is because of the ineptness and stupidity of the present and past governments who infected by the now discredited politically-correct notion of

MULTICULTURALISM

 has left the greater part of our major towns and Cities as

FOREIGN ENCLAVES.

 

 

ENGLAND

'WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.'

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

[THE PROOF OF THIS STATEMENT IN 2015 IS SHOWN IN MANY TOWNS AND CITIES IN OUR ONCE FAMILIAR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND BEFORE THE EU AND MASS IMMIGRATION FROM

 

FOREIGN CULTURES LEADING TO FOREIGN ENCLAVES

WITH THEIR BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 AND MORE IMMIGRATION FROM MUSLIM COUNTRIES  AND FROM  ELSEWHERE WILL UNLESS FIRM DECISIVE ACTION IS TAKEN NOW! WILL LEAD TO A FOREIGN TAKEOVER OF OUR COUNTRY WITHIN A FEW GENERATIONS . WE HAVE SEEN SOME EXAMPLES ON HOW THEY CAPITALISE ON THEIR CUSTOMARY ELECTION TACTICS ONCE DESCRIBED BY A JUDGE INVESTIGATING ELECTION FRAUD IN A LABOUR CONSTITUENCY IN BIRMINGHAM AND WOULD FIT EVENTS RECENTLY IN

TOWER+HAMLETS

AS AN EXAMPLE OF A

BANANA REPUBLIC.  

*

No ISLAMIC STATE would allow millions of Christians or Unbelievers to settle in their countries unless they converted to ISLAM. The PENALTY for not doing so in an ISLAMIC STATE is DEATH. It has been the GREAT WEALTH of SAUDI ARABIA brought about by their OIL DEPOSITS - a legacy of the FIRST WORLD WAR and the BRITISH-FRENCH-USA foreign policy, and the closeness of Cameron and his predecessors to the brutal regime and permitting the sales of large quantities of ARMS used to further the SAUDI HARD FUNDAMENTALIST DOCTRINE worldwide which has caused great suffering in Middle East countries and even subversion in ENGLAND itself. The results of the CHAOS now set to EXPLODE at any time ,which hopefully , will change OUR WORLD into a more EQUITABLE and FAIRER SOCIETY.]

FEBRUARY 17-2016

F.676/3

Brought-forward from December,2010

 

A CHRISTMAS APPEAL!

 

 

WE WONDERED HOW THE BANKSTERS! WILL SURVIVE IN THE CITY OF LONDON BUT FOR THE TIMELY INTERVENTION OF THEIR LOCAL HOLY MAN  THE EVANGELIST FOR

'FREEDOM TODAY' -THE CONSERVATIVE FOLD -

THE REVEREND PETER MULLEN. 

 WE WERE ALMOST ON THE POINT OF GETTING AN APPEAL TOGETHER TO ASSIST THE DOWNTRODDEN FAT-CATS WHEN WE REALIZED THAT IT WAS OF COURSE CHRISTMAS AND THE  MESSAGE OF GOODWILL TO ALL MEN BUT PARTICULARLY THE BANKSTERS WHO GAVE US 12.7 BILLION IN 2007-WE HAVE YET TO HEAR THE BENEFIT WE SHALL RECEIVE FOR 2008 AND 2009. WE WONDER WHY THERE IS A DELAY?. WE ARE FULL OF GREAT EXPECTATION! 

*

Ring of Power - Empire of the City - 4,000 Years of Suppressed History - Conspiracy *
 The inner City of London which is not part of London or England. Today the City State of London is the world's financial power center and the wealthiest square mile on the face of the Earth. It houses the Rothschild controlled Bank of England, Lloyd's of London, the London Stock Exchange,
 www.conspiracyrealitytv.com

 

PREFACE

 

A SECRET WORLD OF GREED AND INTRIGUE!

 

 

Bonuses: Impose restrictions on how the City operates and the talent will simply go somewhere else, says Reverend Peter Mullen

 

Money  

Article

DAILY MAIL MONDAY VIEW: Why economic recovery relies on Square Mile

By REVEREND PETER MULLEN All By This Author - 26/12/2010 22:23:17

In the downturn, is the City getting off lightly while other parts of the country suffer severely? The Rector of St Michael’s in Cornhill - Reverend Peter Mullen investigates.

 

 

ANY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ABOVE WILL BE MOST WELCOME!-GOLD /SILVER PREFERRED.

Brought forward from

DECEMBER 27-2010

 

H F 1312

 ["ENGLAND'S GREEN

 AND PLEASANT LAND."]

*

Letter from Daily Mail, Wednesday, September 20,2017

Houses on land like this will just force prices up.

 [and DESTROY more GREEN BELT- a SACRILEGE and BETRAYAL of a PROMISE not only to the present population but to future generations. It is past and present politicians to BLAME because of the massive INCREASE in POPULATION into our small and once spacious island home. This grievous mistake can be corrected by controlled immigration and finding the financial resources to ensure that those millions of elderly pensioners -many alone in their 3/4 bed-roomed homes can downsize to  more suitable properties which will enhance their remaining days in calm comfort and security and supply an abundance of  family properties onto the now stalled HOUSING MARKET..]

 Below: Letter from David Brown, Stonesfield,Oxon

'CALLS for thousands of homes to be built in the leafiest areas 9Mail) show our politicians are out of touch. They concentrate on the number of houses with no regard to type, style, mix, location and infrastructure .'

[Evidence of this practice is everywhere to be seen-it is an abomination to view the collectivist trend of design which instead of enhancing the neighbourhood is an imposing eyesore of an affront to the individualistic nature and particular character of the existing locality with many centuries of history in its making.]

'In West Oxfordshire, half of any development above ten houses has to be social and affordable housing. As developers receive only the cost price  for building these homes, they have to make their profit from the other 50 per cent and so build only four and five-bedroom houses.

In my village, such new homes cost between £695,000 and £1.2 million. This means that the only two and three bedroom houses being built are SOCIAL or affordable housing, but not all young couples or families meet this criteria.

There are no bungalows suitable for downsizing or to meet the needs of the elderly or disabled people [Theresa May in her incoming speech as PM gave an undertaking to look after ALL the PEOPLE! and to take up this issue is a perfect example to show how to look after-'ALL THE PEOPLE!' and SAVE our COUNTRYSIDE.]

Developers will build anywhere they can get land, so some new estates will not have PUBLIC TRANSPORT and the residents will have to rely solely on their cars using OVERCROWDED roads.

Despite representations to local planners are solely driven by Government quotas. Communities Secretary Sajid Javid's proposal to force more UNSUITABLE HOUSING onto areas such as WEST OXFORDSHIRE will have the unintended consequences of not only DESTROYING AREAS of OUTSTANDING NATURAL BEAUTY but will force up PRICES.

Rather than have more pointless consultations to promote the Government's desired outcome, Mr Javid should visit the places where he wants to impose development and TALK to LOCAL PEOPLE and PARISH COUNCILLORS like me. He would learn more in a couple of hours that from countless papers presented by his researchers.

DAVID BROWN, Stonesfield ,Oxon.

DAILY MAIL-SEPTEMBER 20,2017

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1305

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 
 
2017-09-19

Urgent questions from a political prisoner

By  White Dragon Society  0 Comments
1) Have you heard of Leo Wanta and the $30 trillion plus of money that was stolen from him by the Bush cabal? What do you know of the current prospects for release of the money to Wanta by Trump?

Yes I have heard of Mr. Wanta. He is not about to get his money. Instead he is going to join the long list of people who have been ripped off astronomical sums by the establishment in Washington DC. Just ask the Kuomintang Chinese about how much luck they have had getting their historical gold holdings back. We are going to have to put these people out of business but doing so will not get any money back. It will just stop them from stealing more.

2) What do you think of the cloning situation in Washington, D.C., with so many government officials having impostors standing in for them, and the same for the media? I hope your are aware of how far the cloning goes in our chain-of-command…

Many people have told me about clones and cloning and there is definitely something to it. One Asian triad assassin told he how he killed his “Jewish handler” only to have the same man reappear later. However, until we have definitive disclosure on this subject, I use Occam’s razor and look for explanations within the mainstream world paradigm. There is beyond a doubt the use of body doubles enhanced with plastic surgery and the use of computer graphics to create TV appearances of dead people is widespread.

3) Are you aware of Preston James’ writings? He is a columnist for Veterans Today, and writes extensively on the history and methods of the Khazarian mafia and the Secret Shadow Government. What is your opinion of him and Veterans Today?

Yes I like his writing and support much of what he says. Veteran’s today is a valuable source of opinion and intelligence on the net. I do not agree with everything they say and do and that is how it should be in an environment of open and healthy discourse.

 
2017-09-18

Donald Trump to go on November begathon to Asia

By  White Dragon Society  57 Comments
As a reminder, we are currently in the 2nd week of a four week subscription drive to restore the income that Benjamin Fulford depends upon for his work and his livelihood. All previous PayPal subscribers are urged to support Benjamin by re-subscribing at their earliest convenience. New subscribers are also most welcome to sign up and join the Internet’s premiere deep geo-political news and discussion website. The precise steps to (re)subscribe are listed below. Please share the link to this article on social media. Your support is greatly appreciated.
  1. If you already have a user account, please Log In first. If not, skip this step. If you have an account but are unable to log in, please follow the steps to Reset Your Password.
  2. Visit the Registration Page and fill in the necessary details, if any, including the “I’m not a robot” checkbox.
  3. Click the “Submit Payment” button.
  4. A popup box will appear where you can enter your credit card details and click the green button to pay. Visa, MasterCard, and American Express are accepted.
  5. Please note that you may need to complete the “I’m not a robot” procedure one more time, or perform other verification, for confirmation and fraud prevention.
  6. You will receive an email and be directed to a page confirming your successful subscription.

Donald Trump to go on November begathon to Asia

US President Donald Trump is scheduled to go to Asia in November, officially to attend an APEC meeting but in reality to go on a begathon, multiple sources agree. The begathon is aimed at getting money to keep the bankrupt US corporate government going beyond the December extension it was given by its mostly Asian creditors.

The US corporate government was given enough money to continue operation for 3 months after its September 30th fiscal year end payments deadline because “they threatened to destroy the planet,” Asian secret society sources confirmed during a meeting last week with representatives of the White Dragon Society. In other words, they confirmed the entire recent North Korean brouhaha is nothing but a major extortion campaign.

The WDS, for its part, recommended that the Asians give the US corporate government a choice for beyond December: “either accept the next payments through Canada in exchange for Canadian led reform of your political and economic system or else we will call your bluff on all out nuclear war.” It is a pretty safe bet what the Americans would do if forced to choose between nuclear holocaust and Canadians.

In such a scenario the US military chain of command would remain intact and possibly even take over the Canadian armed forces as well. In exchange, the Canadians would have control over politics and the economy during a clean-up of the sewer that Washington DC has become. Such a move is likely to have public support. American support of the politicians in DC is below 10% even while support for the US armed forces is consistently around 70%. By contrast, over 60% of Canadians support their government because unlike the bribed, blackmailed DC swamp, it actually works for the people.

In any case, the signs of imminent US bankruptcy and collapse are proliferating day by day so, the ability of the US corporate government to keep kicking the can down the road is ending anyway and some hard choices will have to be made.

In California, for example, Calpers, the largest public pension fund in the US, and one of the best managed, is being forced to cut pension pay outs by as much as 90%.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-13/calpers-slashes-pension-payments-retirees-two-more-california-towns-90
Meanwhile, the State of Pennsylvania is joining Illinois, Puerto Rico, Detroit and others in being unable to pay its bills.
 http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-13/calpers-slashes-pension-payments-retirees-two-more-california-towns-90

These events reflect the fact the petro-dollar system that has allowed the US corporate government to live beyond its means for the past 40 years is collapsing. As has been widely noted, China has announced it will be buying oil used gold backed yuan, dealing a deathblow to the petrodollar. Now Venezuela, one of the biggest sources of US oil imports, says it will no longer accept payment for oil in US dollars.
 http://www.foxbusiness.com/features/2017/09/13/venezuela-stops-accepting-dollars-for-oil-payments-following-u-s-sanctions.html

Another sign of desperation was “the US going after Indonesia for a huge 40% import (penalty) tax on the palm oil… A bankrupt Nation scrambling for dollars in any way they can to keep afloat. Just remember who came here at the onset and convinced the Indonesia government, with huge under the table payments, to cut down the jungles in the first place,” WDS sources in Indonesia point out.

In these desperate circumstances US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin last week echoed earlier Tweets by US President Trump when he threatened to cut China off from “accessing the US and international dollar system.”
 https://www.rt.com/usa/403118-usa-china-sanctions-north-korea/

Multiple pundits and experts sounded the alarm at these comments because it is clear the US would lose any economic war with China and that trying to cut China off from the dollar system would destroy the dollar, not China. That is because the United States is the most indebted country in the history of the planet and a cut off of finance would lead to a drastic drop in US living standards and isolation of the US from the world economy.

The Chinese, who prefer harmony to nasty fights, have been giving lip service to US calls to “sanction North Korea,” so as to avoid giving the Americans a pretext to take rash actions. However, senior North Korean agents based in Japan say the sanctions are in name only and that the supply of goods from China and oil from Russia continues to pour into North Korea unabated.

The Khazarian mafia, for its part, is pushing hard for the US corporate government to accept the Paris accords as a precondition for further financing. This move is being spearheaded by top Khazarians in the Trump regime like economic adviser Gary Cohn and Trump son in law Jared Kushner.

The problem with the Paris accords, other than the fact they are based on pseudo-science by bribed scientists, is that they keep the Khazarian mob in charge of the world financial system. The Paris accords do give the Chinese a bigger seat at the table but they humiliate India and Japan and keep overall Khazarian control intact.

At this point we need to take a close look at the connection between the Vatican, the P2 Freemason lodge and the Khazarian mafia to understand what is really going on in this planet.

David Rockefeller and members of the British Royal Family as well as members of the Rothschild family all point to the P2 lodge -the would be creators of a fascist world Roman dictatorship- as both the real controllers of the US dollar system and the source of most of the world’s terrorism. Top Khazarian mob leaders like Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu work for them, these sources say.

In Japan this writer has systematically documented how the P2 lodge, then headed by top Jesuit Peter Hans Kolvenbach, was behind the March 11th, 2011 nuclear and tsunami mass murder terror attack against Japan. Now Asian secret society and top Japanese gangsters sources both confirm that, since the Fukushima terror incident, truckloads of Japanese 10,000 yen bills (the equivalent of US $100 bills) have been shipped up to Fukushima. There the money is recycled to politicians and gangsters even as the public excuse being put out is that it is all being spent “cleaning up Fukushima radiation.” In other words Fukushima is being used as an excuse to launder radioactive money not radioactivity.

Former Japanese Finance Minister Heizo Takenaka is still one of the top Khazarian sub-contractors distributing this Fukushima terror money, Japanese gangster sources confirm.

Pentagon sources say “the war against the cabal in Japan will escalate after the removal of Pacific Commander Admiral Harry Harris,” due this year end.

In the meantime though, Japanese security police sources say that Khazarian slave Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is being informed in advance of “North Korean missile launches,” and is given a script to read in response. This charade is being carried out not only to extort money with the threat of nuclear war but also to create a plausible excuse to ramp up the widely despised Abe’s fake opinion poll support, the sources say.

If Pope Francis really is sincere about reforming the Vatican and the P2, he needs to come clean about Fukushima and reveal the documented involvement of Kolvenbach and his henchman Netanyahu.

Netanyahu’s “unprecedented trip [last week] to Colombia, Argentina and Mexico will do little to stop the war on Mossad and the war on drugs by the Southern Command, which was, and perhaps is still led, by General John Kelly who now runs the White House,” Pentagon sources point out.
Netanyahu’s trip prompted US Defense Secretary James Mathis and Northern Command’s General Lori Robinson “to visit Mexican military leaders in Mexico city September 15 after bibi [Netanyahu] left, to take down Mexican drug cartels,” the Pentagon sources say. The Mexican 8.1 quake may have been a cabal attempt to force Mexico to stop aid to [Hurricane] Harvey victims, the sources add.
Netanyahu may have also been seeking a place for political asylum because he knows the real Jews in Israel are waking up to the fact he is a Satan worshipping pseudo-Jew and are preparing to put him in jail where he belongs.

The Israelis are being forced to deal with their Satanic leadership because their Daesh mercenary army is being thoroughly defeated by a de facto alliance between the US military, Iran, Russia and Turkey. Even the Mossad linked Debka site acknowledges this reality by reporting a US/Russian pincer attack against Daesh.
 http://www.debka.com/article/26221/US-Russian-pincer-for-ISIS-in-Euphrates-Valley

The tectonic shift in the old power balance in the Middle East was underlined when Turkey, which has the second largest NATO army, announced last week it was buying Russian S400 anti-aircraft missiles.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-41237812
The Pentagon sources also say that speeches on the September 11, 911 anniversary by US Trump, Mattis, Dunford and others “promise actions against terrorists (Bush-Israel) while refusing to name Saudi or Islamic terrorism as perpetrators.”
Taken together with the purge last week of 16 top Saudi officials, this may well mean Saudi Arabia’s new King Salman is cutting off his nation’s secret alliance with Israel in order to maintain the US military support his regime needs to survive. This means Israel too must purge its Satanic leadership if it is to survive.
The tectonic plate shifts in the world’s power structure now taking place are so huge that humanity may be liberated this autumn.

 
2017-09-11

High level and high stakes Mexican stand off continues despite 911 weather warfare attack on US

By  White Dragon Society  237 Comments
Dear Readers,
As you may know, Benjamin Fulford has recently been targeted with financial attacks and in June 2017 his PayPal account was suspended. At the same time, his former webmaster is suffering from cancer and she has been hospitalized. To help support Benjamin, the WDS has arranged a complete renewal of his website, developed and supported by a new IT team. The website now accepts direct credit card payments instead of PayPal. Starting on September 11th we are launching a one month subscription drive to restore the income that Benjamin depends upon for his work and his livelihood. Please follow the below procedure to create a new account or to log in and update your existing account with new credit card details.
  1. If you already have a user account, please Log In first. If not, skip this step. If you have an account but are unable to log in, please follow the steps to Reset Your Password.
  2. Visit the Registration Page and fill in the necessary details, if any, including the “I’m not a robot” checkbox.
  3. Click the “Submit Payment” button.
  4. A popup box will appear where you can enter your credit card details and click the green button to pay. Visa, MasterCard, and American Express are accepted.
  5. Please note that you may need to complete the “I’m not a robot” procedure one more time, or perform other verification, for confirmation and fraud prevention.
  6. You will receive an email and be directed to a page confirming your successful subscription.

The subscription price has been increased from $8 to $11 per month so that we can also compensate the hardworking IT staff. They have been working as volunteers so far to help revamp the site but also have families to support. Your understanding is appreciated. During the subscription drive period, weekly articles will remain freely available, after which time only paying members will be able to read and discuss the content.

BenjaminFulford.net is the premiere internet forum dedicated to the dissemination and discussion of deep geo-political news and analysis. Thank you in advance for supporting Benjamin Fulford and his efforts spread truth and end global poverty, war, and environmental destruction. Please spread the word via email and on social media!

High level and high stakes Mexican stand off continues despite 911 weather warfare attack on US

The intense struggle at the highest levels of world power has become a Mexican stand-off with the Khazarian mafia staging weather warfare attacks on the US in a desperate attempt to retain control of the Federal Reserve Board. Hurricane Harvey, followed by Hurricanes Irma, Katia and Jose have all been associated with some sort of electro-magnetic beams emanating from Antarctica, US Navy sources say.
 http://allnewspipeline.com/Indications_Irma_Weather_Warfare.php

There was also confirmation of sorts in the so-called mainstream media that large 25 degree Celsius warm caves filled with life have been found in Antarctica.
http://nationalpost.com/news/world/researchers-find-secret-warm-oasis-beneath-antarcticas-ice-that-could-be-home-to-undiscovered-species
The timing of this announcement may have just been a coincidence but it seems to be a way of letting the world know that Nazi bases built in volcanically heated caves in Antarctica before, during and after World War 2 are real. This is something the Russians have long been saying.

In any case, a senior source in the P2 Freemason lodge hinted at their involvement in the attack by saying “There is no way out for America, only the big agreement.” The P2 have previously claimed the ability to conjure storms, earthquakes etc. through esoteric rituals linked to astrological events. The journalist Lance Schuttler, who recently interviewed this author, has heard the same thing through his own sources.
 http://www.stillnessinthestorm.com/2017/09/hurricanes-irma-and-harvey-ritualistic-astrology-used-in-geoengineered-false-flags.html

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

H.F.1314
 

David Wilcock's Brakes Sabotaged: Was It the Dark Alliance?

Jump To Comments | Print |

by David Wilcock
August 14, 2017,

8:00 pm

Hits: 95,481
 
Page 1 of 3

 

The main cylinder of David Wilcock's brakes mysteriously died at 2:15 PM on Friday, August 11th, 2017, after a massive wave of attacks had already occurred.

The last time his brakes died like this was when he was driving to the Disclosure Project event on May 10, 2001, in rush-hour Washington DC traffic.

Had this happened just a few minutes earlier in the Topanga mountains, it could very easily have caused a fatality. The brake pedal went all the way to the floor with no response.

This is a war, and on the personal level it just went red-hot. Given the surrounding cluster of threats we have gotten, this does not seem to be coincidental.

We are going on Fade to Black with Jimmy Church this Wednesday night to address the almost ridiculous number of attacks coming our way all at once.

It is logical to conclude that "something big" must be on the way in order for this much disruption to be occurring.

We have chosen to refer to the group orchestrating these attacks, both on and off-line, as the "Dark Alliance." There are a few key players and a relatively small group of minions.

The lower-level action-takers in this Dark Alliance have no idea of how strongly they are being manipulated, nor do they understand the endgame.

 

A WORD ABOUT OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD

The fifth-most popular movie on Amazon Video right now is, amazingly enough, American Media and the Second Assassination of John F. Kennedy.

We just watched it last night, simply because we were fascinated as to how a low-budget indie conspiracy film could have shot all the way up to number five.

Although it has some weak points, such as a certain amount of pixelated video, overall it is quite a damning presentation of real evidence.

This is precisely the type of film that we will expect to see in massive numbers once the positive Alliance, as we have called it, scores critical victories against the Cabal. 

 

 

It talks about the story of Jim Garrison, who somehow managed to break through an almost complete media monopoly to reveal the truth of the JFK assassination.

He was able to do this on television shows such as The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson and Real People.

The official cover-up in the Warren Commission report was very badly botched, and many who tried to expose the truth were systematically killed off.

The government ultimately was forced to admit that the assassination was not carried out the way the Warren Commission cover-up had concluded.

They reluctantly indicated that some hidden conspiracy had indeed been involved in the murder -- without going into details.

This movie does a great job of re-packaging a wealth of information about the JFK assassination that had otherwise gotten lost in the sands of time.

We just lost Jim Marrs recently, who was one of the greatest scholars of the Kennedy assassination, and who also appears as a younger man in the movie.

I am still greatly saddened by Jim's loss, and am glad that I had him on my panels at Contact in the Desert last year and in other years as well.

 

A CIA TAKEOVER OF THE AMERICAN MEDIA

The movie goes into extensive detail describing how the CIA managed to overtake the nation's media in the aftermath of Kennedy's open-air shooting.

This media-infiltration program, as you probably already know, was called Operation Mockingbird.

The details of Operation Mockingbird were openly revealed by the acting director of the CIA during Congressional hearings in the 1970s.

We see footage where he confirms that the CIA had paid assets planted throughout the American media, actively steering the discourse.

The film explains that the code name Mockingbird was a tongue-in-cheek joke.

The "bird" they were mocking was the American mascot, the bald eagle -- and the alleged freedom it represents for the American people.

We somehow went from over 1,900 different media outlets in 1963 to almost all "mainstream media" now being controlled by only five corporations.

The majority of all news that emerges from the "mainstream media" is pre-approved, if not planted by the CIA before it ever sees the light of day.

 

INFILTRATION OF TRAFFIC AND SOCIAL CHOKE-POINTS ONLINE

These same Cabal agents have now infiltrated outlets such as Google, Facebook and Apple News to a stunning degree as well.

Most of the links people try to send me on Facebook now come up with a red exclamation mark and the message "This attachment could not be loaded."

In other cases, the above words do not appear and I simply see the red exclamation mark and a blank red box. See the images below for a few examples.

I should film this some time, because the degree to which this is now happening in the Facebook messages I receive is utterly ridiculous.

This is not normal behavior. This is absolute desperation. There is no "plausible deniability." It is obvious Mockingbird censorship, plain and simple:

 

As a result of how upsetting this is to me, I have largely avoided looking at Facebook except on small occasions when I meditate and prepare for it.

I know this censorship is very real, but being reminded of it day after day is demoralizing.

 

GMAIL IS NO PICNIC EITHER

Things truly went into the Twilight Zone before the 2016 US election, when anyone speaking out against tyranny became labeled as "Fake News" and blocked.

As you probably know by now, unless you use a filtering service like Gmail, you will get so much spam you cannot even function.

I have identified countless terms people can use in emails that will cause them to auto-route into either Spam or Trash on Gmail.

This, again, is a consequence of the unconstitutional "Fake News" ban, which insiders say was solely created in an attempt to stop Pedogate news from spreading.

I have missed many valuable letters from partners and associates as a result of this nearly all-consuming censorship. I have to check these folders regularly.

The methods I have just described are only a handful of many that are now being actively used.

Friends of mine who watch Pizzagate videos tell me that it is much, much harder to find them now than it was before. You really have to go digging.

These stories are being "Buried" because these Mockingbird-controlled internet giants have determined that it is too dangerous for you to see "Fake News."

If you become labeled as Fake News, you have no recourse. We all have to work harder to make sure that critical information is not being suppressed.

 

GOOTUBE HIT-COUNTER SUPPRESSION

Another prominent recent example of the Cabal over-playing their hand was in the massive suppression of the hit counter on a recent viral video.

A team called Super Deluxe made a parody of Alex Jones discussing Pedogate-type subjects. His voice was then replaced by an indie folk singer with guitar.

 

 

This is not only hilarious and very cleverly done, it is also a catchy song that will likely get stuck in your head for weeks. Be forewarned!

"Potbelly Goblins," or whatever you want to call it, was so popular that in four weeks it has generated hundreds, if not thousands of knock-off videos in various styles and genres.

 

A CATHARTIC RELEASE THAT IS BEING ARTIFICIALLY SUPPRESSED

Although some interpreted this as an attack piece against Alex Jones, it actually served as a mass, cathartic release of frustration for millennials.

Many in this generation are now well aware of Pedogate and the deep ugliness that exists, and this song definitely helps you process the emotions with humor.

Millions suddenly realized Alex was talking stridently and openly about the many uncomfortable things they had recently learned.

The video went stunningly viral on the day it was released, July 14th, 2017. According to many commenters, it racked up seven million views in that first day.

Alex Jones referred to there being seven million views on this video in an announcement he made the next day, at the 1:19 point.

 

THE HIT COUNTER SUDDENLY PLUNGED

Hundreds of thousands were shocked to watch as the hit counter suddenly plunged to 1.5 million, or thereabouts, and stayed there.

I was reading the comments. No one could believe what they had just witnessed.

For me this was just another example of our new Mockingbird standard of internet censorship by the Giants.

Even now, a full month later, it has barely edged above 2 million and has apparently had several more "edits" to its viewing numbers, as countless comments reveal.

If you find a screen capture someone took with the higher hit counter, send it along and we will post it up here.

 

 

LET'S NOT FORGET WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED

The "Pedogate" investigation has revealed that a small, highly-organized group of people are deeply involved in what we would think of as acts of evil.

This includes rape, torture and murder of adults and children. In some cases this occurs in ritual contexts -- literally involving robes, candles and so on.

It does seem quite crazy, but Luciferian symbolism is being openly advertised through many different forms of controlled Mockingbird media.

We have rigorously documented this in music videos, the Grammy awards, the Super Bowl half-time show and the Olympics opening and closing ceremonies.

A great deal of additional new material was presented last December in Endgame: Disclosure and the Final Defeat of the Cabal.

The single best website exposing the rampant "Illuminati" symbolism in music videos is, in my opinion, Vigilant Citizen.

Skeptics, faced with incontrovertible evidence, think this symbolism is just an attempt by the industry elites to appear "edgy" and "cool." It is far more than that.

I also consider it "required reading" that you study Financial Tyranny; CONFIRMED: US Military Alliance Defeating Federal Reserve; and Cosmic Perspective on the Defeat of the Cabal.

This is enough material to fill several college classes, if not to become a BA in Conspiracy Analysis -- and it is all free online for you to read.

 

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, YES, BUT....

In principle I support religious freedom. If you want to think God is the Flying Spaghetti Monster and you are not hurting anyone, that's your choice.

The problem is that these Cabal people are very involved in practicing black magic and what most people would call satanism.

It is a essentially a worldwide nightmare that, up until recently, few were even willing to consider as being the truth because it was so horrific.

Even worse, the Cabal has incessanly pushed for any of a variety of strategies to "depopulate" the planet. 

As they revealed in the infamous "Georgia Guidestones" manifesto, they want to reduce human life on earth to as little as half a billion people.

Our intel reveals that the following is just a short list of all the strategies that they have been attempting to implement:

  • Nuclear war
  • Viral pandemics
  • Chemical spills
  • Depleted uranium munitions
  • "Weaponized" foods and vaccines
  • Engineered economic collapse
  • Martial law
  • Internment camps
  • Deliberately-provoked wars
  • Weather disasters
  • 'Natural' catastrophes, and even:
  • A faked alien invasion.

 

WE ARE BEING PROTECTED

For years now we have reported how benevolent extraterrestrial humans are systematically preventing the Cabal from accomplishing any of the "big stuff."

Apollo astronaut and American hero Edgar Mitchell spoke about this extensively. I covered it in Disclosure Showdown. The good ETs will simply not allow us to have a nuclear war.

Given that Alex Jones was leaking intel that mass starvation, martial law and FEMA camps were imminent all the way back in 1995, it is amazing that nothing has happened in all this time.

Pete Peterson was given advance warning about 9/11, as were others, and the hope or expectation was that all of these things would have resulted from it.

I have personally been subject to countless briefings warning of this sort of scenario. Yet, the positive efforts to stop it work so well that I label it all as "fear porn."

A few great examples of "divine intervention" becoming very obvious in our headlines can be found in the China's October Surprise series and Disclosure Imminent? Two Underground NWO Bases Destroyed. 

 

IT GETS EVEN STRANGER IF ALL THE INTEL IS TRUE

In the far more esoteric category, reliable insiders have told me the Cabal has vast cloning facilities. I have no proof of this, but here is what I have heard.

They have actually designed 'zombies' that are a type of biological robot, complete with control circuitry in their heads to steer their behavior.

The clones are not very intelligent, can only perform very basic tasks, and only live for a short time once activated. Otherwise they lie in stasis chambers.

These entities have a virus that causes them to bleed out of every orifice as well as their fingernails, and if they scratch you, it leads to a fatality.

There is no contagious virus that can make others turn into carriers. They simply have different biology that is very lethal to the rest of us.

 

MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ARE APPARENTLY LIVING UNDERGROUND

Many people from the surface are now living underground in any of about 250 known cities that are very large, holding up to 65,000 people each.

Multiple insiders have confirmed the details of this vast underground build-out to me. It was originally designed for the elites to survive a nuclear war.

This sort of massive construction project is part of why the entire planet is now suffering a massive, largely unacknowledged economic depression.

All of our money had to go somewhere. Once you go digging for it, you find that the money created vast cities underground... and elsewhere.

These cities were populated starting with the "Brain Drain" back in the 1950s.

Some people are recruited, whereas others are straight-ahead kidnapped and become missing persons.

Some of these cities are simulated to look like the real thing -- so you think you are in a house in the sububrbs, and can go take a walk outside, et cetera.

With some basic hypnotic programming, a cloned person could be absolutely convinced they were living a normal, everyday surface life.

They might have amnesia around the circumstances that led to them getting where they are -- just like we see in the original Total Recall film.

 

MASS SIMULATIONS

We have heard that "zombie" simulations are run in these cities where the victims are clones, who think they are living a normal surface life.

The programmed zombies are released. The relative success or failure in how many people die from it is meticulously studied as a "simulation."

Each major type of population center on earth's surface has corresponding simulated environments underground... whether cities, suburbs or countryside.

Hidden cameras monitor everything that goes on and detailed meta-analyses of the results are conducted via supercomputers.

After 24 hours, the entire simulation is gassed and everyone in it, zombie, survivor or otherwise, dies. I found this quite surprising and disappointing.

The set is cleared, any messes are cleaned up and repaired, and before long the stage is set for another simulation to be run again.

Apparently the Cabal sees no value in keeping any survivors alive, and they are not bred to live very long anyway.

If this sounds like the makings of a good horror movie, you would not be mistaken. In fact, it's already been done... repeatedly.

 

RESIDENT EVIL MAY NOT BE FICTION

The "Resident Evil" movies feature so much classified information about this that one of my insiders gets PTSD just from trying to watch them.

I do not recommend seeing them unless you can stomach very disturbing zombie horror films, complete with numerous death scenes.

They are not gratuitously gory as a general rule, but the overall feeling of dread requires you to stay positive and balanced as you watch.

These films have far more detail and odd, expensive technical effects and sets than they would need to have in order to get the point across.

I watched the first three of them with this insider and got a guided tour of how much "real stuff" was being disclosed -- and I must admit it is very strange.

 

 

There is no question that the Umbrella Corporation represents the Cabal, complete with their ubiquitous symbol of the Templar cross.

 

 

The Templar symbols alone make it worth your while to study these films academically, if you can get through all the violence and disturbing imagery.

 

UNDERGROUND BASES REVEALED ACCURATELY

The underground base in Resident Evil, referred to as "The Hive," is a precise duplication of what many of these facilities actually look like.

 

 

There is also a strange, predatory artificial intelligence, or AI, that takes control of The Hive in some of the films and generates these zombie simulations.

Grotesque, monstrous beings apparently reflect prototypes of various clones and genetic experiments that have been devised.

They have already done six of these films since 2002, and are now rebooting the series yet again. Each of them apparently contain ugly but true information.

 

DARK CITY IS NOT THAT DIFFERENT IN SOME WAYS

Another highly bizarre and disturbing movie that appears to have disclosed these types of bizarre simulations is Dark City.

 

 

In this movie we also are shown that a highly unpleasant extraterrestrial race of bald humans is generating and supervising all of this for their own benefit.

AUGUST 14-2017

H.F.1284
 

LETTER TO THE LETTERS SECTION OF THE DAILY MAIL-MONDAY,AUGUST 25,2014

COMPLY or DIE

FOR generations, the British people have welcomed people of all nations to share their life and economy

It is true that not everyone liked the new arrivals, but the immigrants integrated, embraced democracy and contributed to society in what was essentially a Christian country and which was viewed as such by those incomers.

Recently, these dynamics have been changed drastically by the emergence of a belligerent, vocal, fundamentalist Islam. These are not ignorant peasants, but include intelligent, well-educated individuals, who are fanatical in their beliefs, unafraid to die and capable of using the civil liberties and human rights laws to pursue their objectives.

Why haven't the hard-working family-orientated Muslims, many of whom are second and third generation citizens, raised their voices and rejected them? The answer is simple:

FEAR.

Look around the world and see what Muslim is capable of doing to Muslim Families fear the radicalisation of their young and repercussions of raising their head above the parapet.

Fundamentalist Islam

is a

TOTALITARIAN SOCIETY

 where the choice is simple:

COMPLY or DIE

You cannot blame law-abiding  and fearful Muslims for

KEEPING QUIET

when the British authorities are unwilling or incapable of action because the very laws EUROPE  has passed to protect DEMOCRACY and eliminate racism are CLEVERLY manipulated by

EXTREMISTS to pursue their own AGENDA

How many church bells have been silenced because Muslims were offended by the sound of them? How many people have been told not to wear crosses in the workplace because it could be considered offensive to Muslims?

The question is which Muslims?

 Certainly not my neighbours.

Women are permitted in this country to walk about in public with their faces entirely covered but this is not a requirement of the KORAN as interpreted by most Muslims and not a requirement in a great many Muslim countries

Radical religious teachers are allowed to indoctrinate Muslim children, young men and women are persuaded to go and fight abroad for

 TERRORIST ORGANISATIONS

and then return as full citizens with their rights intact.

Are the British authorities so blind that they cannot see what is happening under their noses. Perhaps when the flag of the

CALIPHATE

is flying above civic buildings they will realise thety have the choice of

'COMPLY or DIE'

Name supplied, Manchester

*

[The majority of politicians turn a blind eye because they wont the votes and until the Human Rights legislation is scrapped and we leave the EU it is very unlikely that anything will change.   We understand the reluctance of many Muslims to keep under cover knowing the character of the opposition but with such a dangerous situation at the present time it is going to get even worse in the near future so it is most vital that democratically minded Muslims must  fight for what they believe in- as there is no other way out of the present impasse except that they

VOTE FOR UKIP

who want

OUT OF THE EU AND THE  SO-CALLED HUMAN RIGHTS LAW SCRAPPED.

*

 

[WE LIVE IN AN ISLAND HOME WHICH SHOULD HAVE ENSURED THAT THE PEOPLE WOULD BE ONE OF THE MOST SECURE AND HAPPIEST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD. BUT A GREATER NUMBER OF OUR POLITICIANS HAVE FAILED US BY THEIR LIES AND DECEIT -SOME BLACKMAILED BECAUSE OF THEIR PROTECTION FROM PUNISHMENT FOR THEIR ATROCIOUS VILE CRIMES WHICH INCLUDES

TREASON

 IN ORDER TO SECURE OUR SECLUSION IN THE SATANIC-COLLECTIVIST-SOVIETISED-CORRUPT-UNDEMOCRATIC EU AND THE CONSEQUENT HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION WITH MASSIVE IMMIGRATION  AND ILLEGAL WARS WHICH AS WE CAN SEE TODAY IN AUGUST 2014 HAS CHANGED IN ENGLAND WHAT WAS ONCE A COHESIVE SOCIETY INTO FRAGMENTED COMMUNITIES MANY OF WHICH HAVE NO INTENTION OF INTEGRATING BUT TO SECURE WITH THEIR HIGHER BIRTH-RATE IN TIME AN ISLAMIC STATE UNDER SHARIA LAW  WHICH AS WE NOW SEE ENACTED  IN THE MIDDLE EAST IS AS FAR FROM THE TRUE IDEALS OF ISLAM AS MANY RESPECTED AND MODERATE IMAMS AND OTHERS IN OUR ISLAND COMMUNITY HAVE  NOW CONFIRMED THAT THE GOVERNMENT MUST RIGHT THE WRONG AND GET A GRIP ON THE DEPLORABLE AND DANGEROUS SITUATION.

 

FAST!-WITHOUT DELAY]

 

AUGUST 25,2014

*  *  *

ADDED SEPTEMBER 4-2017

[Since 2014 there has been no real progress by the government of the day to get a grip on the situation because it is getting more dangerous and soon be irreversible or even irrevocable. The key to the impasse is not only the GOVERNMENT but SAUDI ARABIA.

The BURKA and other items of dress have been BANNED in BELGIUM-GERMANY-FRANCE and other countries in the EU

WHY IS IT NOT BANNED IN ENGLAND(?)

Moderate Muslin clerics say that the Burka and other items are not essential items and are not mentioned in the KORAN.

This subject should be suitable for a

REFERENDUM if the GOVERNMENT are not sure of  support in PARLIAMENT.

LET US GET THIS MOST URGENT MATTER DEALT WITH IN A TRUE "HARD BREXIT" SPIRIT-

NOW!]

ADDED SEPTEMBER 4-2017

 

H. F. 54
We British Muslims have got to speak OUT!

by

Dr Taj Hargey-Director of the Muslim Educational Centre in Oxford.

THERE is nothing in ISLAM that CAN JUSTIFY the taking of an INNOCENT LIFE,  NOTHING that CAN CONDONE what MURDEROUS ISLAMIC STATE FANATICS have DONE in its NAME. This GANG of CRIMINALS has brought OUR FAITH into GRAVE DISPUTE and BESMIRCHED its HONOUR.

Muslim leaders must act before it is

TO LATE!

We must demonstrate that this horrendous slaughter in Paris was not sanctioned by us or perpetuated with our blessing.  And we must prove to young impressionable Muslims that

WE DO NOT CONDONE THIS CARNAGE

The French Muslim community should have acked morwe assertively already. They should be marching in the streets, chanting

' NOT IN MY NAME!

,NOT IN THE NAME OF ISLAM

But instead, there is an eerie

SILENCE

They are doing nothing tangible to oppose the

POLITICAL IDEOLOGY

from

SAUDI ARABIA

and which sadly has infected

EUROPEAN ISLAM

In Great britain, the Muslim Council of Britain, the Islamic Society of Britain should be bussing in Muslims from SCotland, Wal;es, all over the United Kingdom to

PROTEST in our CAPITAL

at what happened. They should be organising a mass

NOT in our NAME'

March of all Muslims, irrespective of sect or denomination, condemning IS unreservedly for all it stands for.

A tiny rally in

TRAVALGAR SQUARE

on Saturday night  is not good enough. Prominent Muslim organisations need to

SPEARHEAD the FIGHT

against

IS

and the ugliness and intolerance

THAT IT REPRESENTS.

[TO BE CONTINED]

*

We British Muslims have got to speak out, says DR TAJ HARGEY  

By Dr Taj Hargey For The Daily Mail - November 16th 2015, 1:31:58 am

 

 

 

Daily Mail, Monday, November 16,2015

H.F.621
 

SHADOW OF A BLOODY PAST

SATURDAY

ESSAY

by

Tom Holland

For centuries, Islam and Christianity were locked in a brutal conflict most have forgotten. The horror, a top historian argues, is that for jihadis it's as real today as it was in the Middle Ages.

 

EXTRACT

...year after year, Turkish forces probed Christian defences, crossing the plains of Hungary or churning the waters off Malta with their warships. In 1529 and again in 1683, an Ottoman army almost took Vienna.

Yet that was to be the last great attempt to extend the Caliphate across Europe. The global balance of power was shifting, and nearly a millennium of Muslim preponderance was drawing to a close.

It was the Christians who colonised America, established trading empires that spanned the globe and started the process of industrialisation.  By the 19th century with India ruled by the British Raj and the Islamic Ottoman Empire scorned in Western capitals as 'the sick man of Europe', Muslims could no longer close their eyes to the sheer scale of their decline.

It was they who were now the imperial subjects, and Islam the civilisation looked down on by its adversaries as backward, as Christendom had once been.

Ever since the first days of their faith, Muslims had tended to take for granted that its truth was manifest in its worldly success.

As a result, subordinated to the infidel British or French there were many in the Muslim world who looked to the golden age of the Caliphate for their  inspiration.

The age of Muhammad and his successors, which had seen Islam emerge from desert obscurity tom global empire, was enshrined as the model to follow. Over recent decades resentment at continued Western interventions in Muslin countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq have only burnished the appeal of the glorious past.

Today, according to a poll some two-thirds of Muslims worldwide want to see the

RESTORATION of a CALIPHATE

It is not empires per se they are apposed to -just

NON-ISLAMIC EMPIRES

Hardly surprising then that al-Qaeda and ISIS should be so obsessed by periods of history that to most Westerners are thoroughly obscure.

That Constantinople

has been a Muslim city for almost 600 years, that the Crusades are done and dusted and that Europe no longer defines itself as Christendom, barely intrudes on the consciousness of many jihadis.

They inhabit a mental landscape in which the Middle Ages never went away. The menace of this way of thinking is brutally evident-a world in which young people murdered a rock concert, can be cursed as 'Crusaders' is a world on the verge of going mad.

It is not just non-Muslims who are threatened by this imperialist nostalgia.

 'Either you are with the Crusade, 'ISIS has warned European Muslims,' or you are with ISLAM

...

More!

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

[WHAT WE HAVE IS A NIGHTMARE SITUATION OF A GUERRILLA WAR UNFOLDING SUPPORTED BY THOSE HARD-LINE FUNDAMENTALISTS  AND THEIR SUPPORTERS WITHIN THE 3,000,000 MUSLIM COMMUNITY AND WITH THEIR ADDITIONAL ADVANTAGE OF FULL COVER FROM THE ACCEPTED DRESS  OF THE VEIL AND BURKA-SYMBOLS OF EXTREME ISLAM. IT IS MOST UNLIKELY THAT A MUSLIM WILL BETRAY A FELLOW MUSLIM AS MUCH AS THEY MIGHT DISAGREE WITH THEIR MESSAGE AND INTENDED ACTION.  AS MANY OF OUR TOWNS AND CITIES HAVE ALMOST A PREPONDERANCE OF THOSE OF THE MUSLIM FAITH IT WILL BE ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO PROTECT THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY. THE ONE VITAL ADVANTAGE WE HAD MANY YEARS AGO -THE BOBBIE-ON-THE -BEAT IS NO LONGER THERE-THE VITAL LINK OF TRUST WITH THE LOCAL COMMUNITY SO VERY IMPORTANT IN THE EVENT OF A CRISIS WE SEE BEFORE US TODAY.  WE MENTIONED THIS VERY MATTER MANY YEARS AGO KNOWING HOW IMPORTANT THE LINK WOULD BE IN A NATIONAL EMERGENCY.  AS WE NOW HEAR ISIS HAS ASKED ITS SUPPORTERS IN OUR COMMUNITIES TO STAY PUT-NOT TO JOIN THEM AS THEY THEMSELVES WILL BE ON THEIR WAY TO JOIN THE FIGHT!.]

 

THE GREAT ERROR FROM THE BEGINNING WAS TO ALLOW THE THE LARGE SCALE IMMIGRATION OF THOSE FROM A HISTORICALLY OPPOSING CULTURE  TO SETTLE IN ENGLAND.  THE JEWS NUMBER 300,000 WHEREAS THE MUSLIMS ARE NO DOUBT OVER 3,000,000 WITH A AN ADVANTAGEOUS

 BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1.  MAKE NO MISTAKE THERE ARE MANY OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH WHO LONG TO BELONG TO AN ISLAMIC STATE  .WE HAVE ALREADY GIVEN THEM SHARIA LAW OF PARTS!

 

 IT WAS AND STILL IS OUR STUPID POLITICIANS WHO HAVE PUT AT RISK THE LIVES OF THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE. IN WARTIME ONE HAS INTERNMENT CAMPS BUT IN THE PRESENT SITUATION THIS WOULD BE MOST DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE TO CONSIDER BUT IF THE CARNAGE BECOMES UNCHECKED THEN WHO KNOWS WHAT MEASURES WILL BE NEEDED IN ORDER TO STILL THE VIOLENCE. OVER THE PAST DECADE THERE HAVE BEEN MANY WARNINGS FROM EMINENT AUTHORITY OF THE DANGERS WHICH WOULD ARISE BUT THEY WERE ALL IGNORED BECAUSE OF THE PREVAILING ATTITUDE OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS-THE DETAILS ARE SHOWN IN OUR

 

 IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

 

  Daily Mail-

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

NOVEMBER 21,2015

H F 621/1

DAILY MAIL

  

Killers betray Islam and all Muslims and were driven by their wilfully perverted misinterpretation of faith, says academic

By Dr Taj Hargey For The Daily Mail

 - January 9th 2015, 3:42:24 am

The truth is that there is nothing remotely Islamic about all this murderous fundamentalism. The true tradition of the Muslim religion is one of tolerance and respect for others,

 says DR TAJ HARGEY.

Full article

 

 - January 9th 2015, 3:42:24 am

 

H.F.455
("IN MY VIEW BOTH THE BURKA AND NIQAB SHOULD BE

 

BANNED

 

 AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN FRANCE AND BELGUIM AND ELSEWHERE."

by

Dr Taj Hargey-

Director of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, and Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation)

Diversity should not trump right to a happy foster home | Daily Mail ...

 

...

Tuesday, August 29,2017

An

An obsession with diversity should NEVER trump a child's right to a happy foster home

The social services industry prides itself on its cultural sensitivity, especially when it comes to fostering and adoption.

Respect for background and identity is meant to be central to the process of finding a home for a vulnerable child.

But that ideal has utterly broken down in the case that emerged yesterday, in which it was reported that a five-year-old girl from a white Christian family was placed by Tower Hamlets council in London in two successive Muslim households.

Much to the child’s distress — as logged in confidential local authority reports seen by The Times — neither family seems to have shown much respect or understanding for her upbringing or faith.

One supervisor is reported to have described her sobbing as she begged not to go back to the carer’s home because

‘they don’t speak English’.

A necklace with a crucifix was apparently taken from her and she was told to learn Arabic. She was also told that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’. 

When, on a visit to her birth mother, she was given her favourite dish of spaghetti carbonara to take back to her foster home, she was banned from eating it because it contained bacon.

Compounding what must have been this child’s sense of alienation, her first carer, with whom she spent four months, is said to have worn the niqab — a face veil — when outside the family home.

In the second and current placement, her carer wore the all-enveloping burka and fully concealed her face in public.

(In my view, this is a garment that should have no place in British society. Both the burka and niqab should be banned, as they have been in France, Belgium and elsewhere.)

It is absolutely right that MPs demand an inquiry into this appalling example of forced cultural convergence.

Social services bosses love to prattle about human rights, but the treatment of this little girl represents a denial of her most basic rights.

If the reports are correct, she has been plunged into an unfamiliar environment of language, creed and dress code, where her carers make plain they have little time for her family or heritage.

To a young child, of course, such words mean little — but we can imagine her confusion and anxiety at the apparent hostility towards her background, the dismissive description of its women and its ancient festivals.

And let’s not forget that she is likely to have been traumatised already by difficult family circumstances.

This is yet another case in which the dogma of liberal political correctness appears to have triumphed over common sense. How else could one even begin to rationalise placing this child in strict Muslim households?

Here is what should happen now. The girl should be removed immediately from her current foster parents to a more appropriate placement. Then the social workers and their line managers who made this insensitive decision should be named, shamed and dismissed.

Alienation...

*

Poisonous...

*

Tolerance...

*

Full article

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4831638/Diversity-not-trump-right-happy-foster-home.html#ixzz4r8xRffzN
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter |

*

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT -NOT MULTICULTURE

*

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

*

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

*

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

*

H.F.1293-TOLERANCE-NOT MULTICULTURALISM.
("IN MY VIEW BOTH THE BURKA AND NIQAB SHOULD BE

 

BANNED

 

 AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN FRANCE AND BELGIUM AND ELSEWHERE."

by

Dr Taj Hargey-

Director of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, and Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation)

Diversity should not trump right to a happy foster home | Daily Mail ...

 

...

Tuesday, August 29,2017

An

An obsession with diversity should NEVER trump a child's right to a happy foster home

The social services industry prides itself on its cultural sensitivity, especially when it comes to fostering and adoption.

Respect for background and identity is meant to be central to the process of finding a home for a vulnerable child.

But that ideal has utterly broken down in the case that emerged yesterday, in which it was reported that a five-year-old girl from a white Christian family was placed by Tower Hamlets council in London in two successive Muslim households.

Much to the child’s distress — as logged in confidential local authority reports seen by The Times — neither family seems to have shown much respect or understanding for her upbringing or faith.

One supervisor is reported to have described her sobbing as she begged not to go back to the carer’s home because

‘they don’t speak English’.

A necklace with a crucifix was apparently taken from her and she was told to learn Arabic. She was also told that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’. 

When, on a visit to her birth mother, she was given her favourite dish of spaghetti carbonara to take back to her foster home, she was banned from eating it because it contained bacon.

Compounding what must have been this child’s sense of alienation, her first carer, with whom she spent four months, is said to have worn the niqab — a face veil — when outside the family home.

In the second and current placement, her carer wore the all-enveloping burka and fully concealed her face in public.

(In my view, this is a garment that should have no place in British society. Both the burka and niqab should be banned, as they have been in France, Belgium and elsewhere.)

It is absolutely right that MPs demand an inquiry into this appalling example of forced cultural convergence.

Social services bosses love to prattle about human rights, but the treatment of this little girl represents a denial of her most basic rights.

If the reports are correct, she has been plunged into an unfamiliar environment of language, creed and dress code, where her carers make plain they have little time for her family or heritage.

To a young child, of course, such words mean little — but we can imagine her confusion and anxiety at the apparent hostility towards her background, the dismissive description of its women and its ancient festivals.

And let’s not forget that she is likely to have been traumatised already by difficult family circumstances.

This is yet another case in which the dogma of liberal political correctness appears to have triumphed over common sense. How else could one even begin to rationalise placing this child in strict Muslim households?

Here is what should happen now. The girl should be removed immediately from her current foster parents to a more appropriate placement. Then the social workers and their line managers who made this insensitive decision should be named, shamed and dismissed.

Alienation...

*

Poisonous...

*

Tolerance...

*

Full article

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4831638/Diversity-not-trump-right-happy-foster-home.html#ixzz4r8xRffzN
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter

*

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT -NOT MULTICULTURE

*

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

*

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

*

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

*

[WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1293-TOLERANCE-NOT MULTICULTURALISM.
DAILY MAIL

 

 

 

I rejoice that this toxic preacher is in jail. But why didn't more Muslims stand up to him.

 

 by Dr Taj Hargey

 EXTRACT

...Barbarous

Heavy funding from the Saudi regime ensures Wahhabism is now the most powerful force in most British mosques, faith schools, Muslim organisations and pressure groups like the Muslim Council of Britain.

The outward symbols 0f this primitive doctrine, like the burka and the niqab and bushy beards are increasingly seen as integral to British Islam, though they stem from archaic Arab life and have no theological basis in the Koran.

Yet tragically, it is the stranglehold of Wahhabism that has enabled figures like Choudary to flourish in our midst.

While most  Muslims are decent and peace-loving, characters like Choudary long went unchallenged by Muslim organisations because so many of them shared a similairly doctrinaire outlook, reflected in dress codes, the need for Sharia courts, the rejection of woman's equality, and distain for liberal values.

Groups like the Muslim Council of Britain do not do nearly enough to root out extreme versions of ISLAM here because they too have come under the influence of Wahhabism, whose logical progression is to end up with a

BARBAROUS THEOCRACY

 not dissimilar to that of

ISIS

Rather  than doing more to confront extremists, the

Muslim Council of Britain

acts defensively whenever the all-too-valid link between

TERRORISM and ISLAM

IS

MADE

 

*

[It has been the complicity of prime ministers since Tony Blair to put the wealth of Saudi Arabia as more important -with profitable Arms deals...rather than preventing their insidious religious doctrine from taking a firm hold in our accustomed

 FREE SOCIETY.

 Dr Taj Hargey comments on the English Defence League and Britain First parties using the over worn term 'Racists' which when one considers the extremism of those Muslims who left our shores for jihadism and the recent research that showed well over 60 % could be significantly  more ,  of the

 3,000,000

 Muslims in our country have no intention whatsoever in

INTEGRATING INTO OUR  SOCIETY

, then the above members of those English parties are in comparison choir boys and without a doubt

 PATRIOTS!

As we have stated over the past decades  only a limited number of Muslims should have been permitted to live in our FREE SOCIETY to ensure that they INTEGRATE before allowing others to follow knowing that the Muslim puts their religion before anything else and that they would bring their CUSTOM-SHARIA LAW and work to create a ISLAMIC STATE within ENGLAND which they have certainly made a major beginning-and with a favourable birth-rate of 4 to 1 their population will give them the voting power to create just this...

Because of the British government connection with Saudi-Arabia the flood -gates were opened and NOW we have SHARIA COURTS in 86 Centres in ENGLAND and many of our towns and cities are now reminiscent of a

ISLAMIC COUNTRY.

It is stated that there are 300,000 Jews in our country and others of different faiths who have successfully integrated into our society and are no threat to our

CUSTOM-CONSTITUTION-COUNTRY.

The gross stupidity of our so-called leaders over the past decades has turned many of our once familiar towns and cities of our country into

FOREIGN ENCLAVES

and there is a need to rectify the situation while there is still time to do so and that means that strict measures should be implemented by parliament to prevent the present inevitable future society of a foreign power in our country by passing laws to counteract the expressed intentions of the majority of Muslims-to turn

ENGLAND

into a

ISLAMIC STATE

 

If being a PATRIOT is seen as being a RACIST so be it-it is a small price to pay- for wishing to prevent your own

ENGLISH-CUSTOM-CONSTITUTION-COUNTRY

of over a 1000 years in the making

from being taken from you.

*  *  *

TOLERATION

'Toleration is a good thing in its place; but you cannot tolerate what will not tolerate you, and is trying to cut your throat.'-Froude.

*

'Religious liberty, according to both Locke and Montesquieu, may and does require intolerance of an intolerant religion; and the very spirit of peace and gentleness may require war to be waged by the state against an aggressive religion.- Conneily

 

*

 Full article

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

AUGUST 18, 2018

 

H.F.946 FREEDOM NOW
 
 

 

The Muslim cleric who blames British mosques for the 7/7 bombings, says multiculturalism is a disaster and would throw Islamic fanatics out

By

 Richard Pendlebury
 on 30th April 2009

 

You can usually find at least one in any saloon bar, ready to give you the benefit of their peppery views on the parlous state of Britain today.
 

This particular example is a clean shaven, middle-aged man with the de rigueur attire of carefully knotted mustard tie and blue, golf club-style blazer.
 

Brass cuff buttons flash as he pounds an angry fist on to his knee.
 

 

7/7

Terror: The bus destroyed in the 7/7 London bombings

'I will give £5 to anyone in Britain who wants to live under Sharia law,' he declares. 'It will help pay for their ticket to Sudan, Yemen, Pakistan, or wherever it is customary to live under Sharia law.

'Please, please go and leave us alone. This is Britain, not 10th century Arabia!'

We are indeed sitting in a bar, on a busy main road in Oxford.
 

But the man before me is no stereotypical Islamophobe.
 

For one, he is sipping a glass of water rather than something more inflammatory.
 

More importantly, though by no means obviously, Dr Taj Hargey is himself an Islamic cleric; perhaps the most controversial imam in Britain today.
 

In an age when the highest-profile Muslim preachers are bearded, anti-Western firebrands such as Abu Hamza or Omar Bakri Dr Hargey seems an anomaly.
 

He does not care much for male facial hair. He believes that women can be both seen and heard, even in a mosque at Friday prayers.
 

And don't even get him started on the sort of fanatics who blow up London buses, or the poisonous teachings that inspired them.
 

After three men were cleared this week on charges of assisting the July 7 bombers, there have been calls for an inquiry into blunders made by the security services.
 

But Dr Hargey has little doubt who, and what, is truly to blame for unleashing such terrorism on our streets.
 

 

'It is the extremist ideology present in many UK mosques which is the cement behind nihilistic plots such as this,' he says. 'They are twisting Islam.'

Muslim

Violence: Dr Taj Hargey deplores fanatics such as the suicide bombers who targeted London

He has little or no time for the Government's 'pussyfooting' policy of encouraging multiculturalism.
 

'That is the biggest disaster to happen to Britain since World War II,' he says. 'It has given the extremist mullahs the green light for radicalism and segregation. We have to, we must, adjust to British society. And we can do so without losing our faith.'
 

Hardly surprisingly, such statements have made him wildly unpopular among those who adhere to the brand of ultra-conservative Saudi-funded Wahhabi Islam which currently makes most noise in Britain and around the world.
 

Certainly, if you Google Dr Hargey's name you will find him vilified as a 'charlatan' on any number of Islamic website forums.
 

In return, he is quite happy to describe his critics as 'fanatics'. Recently, one hostile publication went too far.
 

When we meet, Dr Hargey, 56, is still basking in the glow of his successful libel action against the English-language Muslim Weekly newspaper, which had accused him of being a heretic.
 

Earlier this month it agreed to pay him a five-figure sum and issue a grovelling apology, which was a little more esoteric than most heard in the High Court.
 

It stated: 'Dr Taj Hargey has never subscribed to, belonged to or been affiliated with any sect or minority group, religious or otherwise. On the contrary, Dr Hargey has consistently and openly reiterated his unconditional belief in the absolute finality of prophethood in Islam and Mohammed (peace and blessings upon him) as God's last prophet and final messenger.'
 

Afterwards, the cleric described the case as a 'watershed moment' in the battle between 'progressives' such as himself and what he called the 'Muslim McCarthyists', after the U.S. senator who accused opponents of being communist and 'un-American' with little or no evidence. 

 

Muslim

Headscarves: Dr Hargey says they are not necessary

But despite his victory, or perhaps because of it, when his phone rings now it is still almost as likely to be an anonymous death threat as a request for spiritual guidance.
 

Certainly more people hate him than follow him.
 

'The masses have been brainwashed by the mullahs,' he says.
 

Which begs the question: can this intellectual Oxford imam really succeed with his ambition to lead a 'reformation' of British Islam? Or will medieval orthodoxy triumph in the end?
 

Dr Hargey was born and raised in apartheid- era South Africa. The racist state classified him as 'coloured', a second-class citizen. 

One of eight children, his father was a supermarket packer; his mother illiterate.
 

But Hargey was a natural scholar and destined for a better, if consistently controversial, existence.
 

His first battles were against the Pretoria government, rather than fundamentalists from his own faith. 

'The masses have been brainwashed by the mullahs'

The attention he received from the South African security services prefigured the intimidation and intolerance he says he receives from British extremists today: 'I was an anti-apartheid fighter, against institutionalised racism. 

'For me, Islam was a liberating vehicle for attaining justice on this Earth. I was pursued then by the South African secret police, so why should I fear these people now?'
 

Hargey attained his doctorate in Middle Eastern and Islamic studies from Oxford University. His thesis was on the slave trade in Anglo-Egyptian Sudan.
 

Back home, his CV shows that he taught history at the University of Cape Town before relocating to the U.S. in the 1980s to drum up funds for a projected South African-based anti-apartheid newspaper.
 

It is there that his efforts ran into his first experience of widely reported criticism, as allegations were made about his money-raising efforts.
 

'Prophet or Phoney?' was one newspaper headline, which, according to his critics, could equally apply to his current endeavours.
 

Whether these smears had any substance is unclear, although his combative approach has clearly attracted, if not invited, brickbats for the best part of a quarter of a century.
 

Nevertheless, he did hold down a number of academic posts in the United States, not least of which was a spell teaching African studies at the Sarah Lawrence University in New York State, alma mater of Rahm Emanuel, Barack Obama's White House Chief of Staff.
 

His latest venture is the Muslim Education Centre of Oxford, of which he is founding chairman.
 

Abu

Firebrand cleric: Abu Hamza

 

Dr Hargey also leads the city's Summertown Islamic congregation. 'The most progressive pulpit in the land, from which we do everything in English except prayer,' he states.
 

From a borrowed Masonic hall rather than a dedicated mosque, his enemies sneer.
 

The ideological core of his opposition towards the fashionable Islamic fundamentalists lies in his rejection of the absolute importance of hadith and Sharia law.
 

To explain, the Koran is the teaching of Allah, handed down to the Prophet Mohammed.
 

The hadiths, meanwhile, comprise the sayings and actions of Mohammed, as recorded by others, some time after his death.
 

For many Muslims, the hadiths are a fundamental guide and part of their faith. For Hargey, they are often unreliable and an obstacle to the integration of Islam into contemporary society. He believes the Koran is all.
 

'This is a big fight for the hearts and minds of Islam. There is nothing in the Koran which is incompatible with (living in) British society, unlike what I call "Mullah Islam" and their reliance on hadiths.'
 

And so he explains his position: 'These people say they have a right to stone adulterous women. We say show us where it says that in the Koran.
 

'The Koran must have precedence. It must be sovereign. Everything else is supplementary or subservient. All that stuff about jihad, women's rights, apostasy, all these issues come from the hadiths.
 

'We do not say get rid of the hadiths. But we do say that every hadith must pass two litmus tests.
 

First, it must not conflict with the Koran. Second, it must not conflict with reason or logic.
 

'One of the hadiths, for example, says the majority of people in Hell will be women. But let's do a forensic examination of this. First, let's look at the fact that 88 per cent of crimes are committed by men rather than women.
 

'How then, logically, can there be more women in Hell? Theologically, the Koran says that every human irrespective of gender will be rewarded for what they did and punished for what they did not.'
 

Of Sharia law he is even more dismissive. 'The Koran is clear that blasphemy is dealt with in the next life by God. The Sharia, meanwhile, is a medieval compilation of religious opinion which is not immutable, not eternal.
 

'How can we be dependant on 10th-11th-century jurists and scholars? It makes no sense.'
 

He also wants Muslims to integrate more with mainstream Britain.
 

'The (Muslim) reaction to 9/11 was to withdraw. I think the best way is to go out and belong. 

'I love this country, I follow Spurs and I go to the pub, if only to drink orange juice'

'If you met me walking down the street, for example, would you know I am a Muslim? No.
 

'I know I am a Muslim in my heart and my actions, not in my beard or the niqab face mask. The niqab only comes from a hadith and even that only refers to the Prophet's wives. This is a big fight for the hearts and minds of Islam. There is nothing in the Koran that is incompatible with (living in) British society.'
 

Of the cries of 'heretic' to which he is frequently subjected, he argues: 'Faith is between the person and God. No one can pronounce you a heretic (in Islam) and I think that is a wonderful thing.
 

'But we do need a reformation in Islam. We have to go back to the pristine principles in our faith. We need a British Islam and by that I do not mean a compromise.
 

'Christianity was once an alien faith. We have to integrate in a matter of decades rather than centuries.'
 

But what of the accusations that he is simply a State stooge? This angers him.
 

'I have called for Bush and Blair to be indicted at the international criminal court for their wars. What kind of stooge does that make me? 

'We have a multicultural community of men and women, including converts. We are not fanatics and appeal to a very broad constituency. We do not appeal to those who have been brainwashed by the mullahs.
 

These people refuse to debate with me and instead send their minions to do their dirty work on the internet or via anonymous phone calls. We get death threats, intimidation and blackmail tactics. But it does not dissuade us.
 

'Our group is based on the "Three Es": Enlightenment, Egalitarianism and Erudition.
 

But the Government, with its anti-terrorist strategy, has never contacted us, even though we say violence and suicide bombing are against the faith.
 

'What a mistake. In this city we have the Wahhabi-backed Oxford Centre of Islamic Studies. It preaches the most repressive and egregious theology.
 

'We want to establish an Oxford Centre for British Islam. We will have a mosque and the leader could be either male or female.'
 

So, for example, he has supported a state school which banned the niqab, much to the fury of his Muslim foes.
 

And last October he hosted the appearance in Oxford of Professor Amina Wadud, a female Islamic academic, who gave a sermon at Friday prayers before a mixed-gender congregation, which was anathema to the extremists.
 

Dr Hargey says: 'She is the undisputed authority on women in the Koran. We invited this heavyweight intellectual and the people who made the most protest outside our prayer hall were women dressed in niqabs who had been brainwashed by their menfolk.
 

'It was like the time of Emmeline Pankhurst and the suffragettes agitating for the vote.
 

'Then, many of the women were conditioned to think their behaviour a scandal. Now look at all those women walking past us who have the vote and think nothing of it.'
 

He also frowned on the recent extremist demonstration against the troops parading through Luton.
 

'While we feel it was an illegal war, you cannot punish the average squaddie for what is done in the name of New Labour and that toxic Texan.
 

'Yes, the war was wrong, but you cannot call soldiers murderers, or cowards. My life's work is to make British Muslims integrated.'
 

He is also utterly dismissive of the Muslim Council of Britain, which until the Government's recent reversal of policy, was the state's contact point with British Islam.
 

'They are Indo-Pakistani and sexist,' he says. 'It's a reactionary group, infused with the repressive ideology of the Wahhabis.
 

'If we go along their path we will have a ghetto mentality, segregated and giving our enemies such as the British National Party the opportunity to target us like the Jews in the 1930s. Isolation is our greatest peril.'
 

For the record, he supported BNP leader Nick Griffin's recent appearance at an Oxford Union debate, although he certainly did not endorse his views.
 

'We should not silence him. We should expose him.
 

'I love this country, I follow Spurs and I go to the pub, if only to drink orange juice. I am also a Muslim. But I am not a threat. If people like me are smothered then we will all sleep less safely in our beds.
 

'These people are religious fascists. The view that Islam is incompatible with British society is something that the Muslim Council of Britain and their hangers- on have promulgated.'
 

And with that, he adjusts the knot in his mustard tie, drains the last drop of his (non-alcoholic) drink and leaves the bar.
 

He may be a deeply controversial imam. But he is undoubtedly a brave one.

*  *  *

[ADDED SEPTEMBER 4-2017]

[WE AGREE!- THE FAILURE OF THE GOVERNMENT TO SUPPORT MODERATE MUSLIMS HAS IN 8 YEARS MADE OUR COUNTRY MORE DANGEROUS FROM FANATICAL MUSLIM EXTREMISTS WHO LOOK ON WEAKNESS OF PURPOSE AS A MESSAGE TO CONTINUE  THEIR SAVAGE WAR UNTIL ENGLAND IS AN ISLAMIC STATE. THEIR LINKS WITH SAUDI ARABIA  ARE BEYOND DOUBT AND IT IS TIME TO PUT PRINCIPLE BEFORE PROFIT. WE HAVE A FOREIGN AID PROGRAMME MISUSED AND SENDS IN THE MAIN THE MESSAGE-WASTE OF TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS ARE OF NO CONCERN OF CIVIL SERVANTS AND GOVERNMENT AND CERTAINLY NO CONCERN OF THE TAXPAYER.

IF A BUSINESS WERE TO ADOPT SUCH A POLICY OF WASTE OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES THE SHAREHOLDERS WOULD SOON BE ON THE WAR-PATH.]

Print this article Print this article

*

APRIL-2009

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 9-2014

H.F. 706

[ Brought forward from: Daily Mail-Tuesday, July 22, 2008]

 

THEY ARE BLEEDING THE BRITISH PUBLIC DRY

Greed in the Public Sector drains away scarce resources and hard-hit taxpayer picks up the bill.

*

Bonuses in the public sector are nothing less than rewards for

FAILURE

by

Leo McKinstry

[Daily Mail-Tuesday, July 22, 2008]

Yet the instinct to reward failure has become all too common at the top of the

PUBLIC SECTOR.

But now bureaucrats are aping their counterparts in the PRIVATE SECTOR without experiencing any of the real commercial pressures.

It is telling that ,while they all squeal their justifications for their huge payouts,  they would not dream of the alternative :

THAT PAY should be CUT as a result of INEFFICIENCY.

Thanks  to this CULTURE of  INDULGENCE, we have ended up with the WORST of WORLDS: CRIPPLING COSTS and DISMAL SERVICES provided by an

ARROGANT-OVERPAID-ELITIST PUBLIC SECTOR.

*

    All articles by Leo McKinstry - journalisted.com

    journalisted.com/leo-mckinstry?allarticles=yes

    New border rules are EU's attempt to punish Britain, says LEO MCKINSTRY.
    express.co.uk ... The Daily Telegraph, Wednesday 26 July More about this article
    ...... Royal Mail Veto On Patriotic Stamps Is Rank Stupidity. express.co.uk ......
    Bonuses in the public sector are nothing less than rewards for failure. MailOnline,
    Mon ...
     

    After civil servants' soaring pay, a 20% rise in their bonuses | Daily ...

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../After-civil-servants-soaring-pay-20-rise-bonuses.html

    2 Jun 2010 ... A survey by the Daily Mail has found that more than half of the departments ...
    Named: 172 civil servants paid more than the Prime Minister LEO MCKINSTRY:
    These ... who had urged 'more discipline' in public sector pay following the ... paid
    out less than the year before, £1.1million compared to £1.2million.
     

 

[TO BE CONTINUED]

JULY -2008

H.F.368

[Brought-forward from April-2007 and 7 years later Speaker Michael Martin is still in place even though he has shown a robust partisan manner in the HOUSE.]

[THE

MAD PARLIAMENT]

*

Shouts of 'prat drowned him out

by

Quintin Letts

Yesterday in Parliament

[Daily Mail, Thursday, April 19, 2007]

UNLESS it protects the rights of the individual Members of Parliament - it means nothing.

UNLESS the authorities ensure the loner is HEARD as fairly as the tribalist, the principle of elected democracy snaps.

 

That us WHY I must seize my trusty frying pan, lift it high, and again bring it down smartly on the head of the Rt Hon Michael Martin, Speaker of the House of Commons. Our old friend G. Mick.

Mr Martin did not just lose CONTROL of Prime Minister's Question Time. There are times when he did not even try to IMPOSE ORDER.

That Tony Blair and David Cameron traded noisy insults need not worry us. Mr Cameron won a bout of exchanges about pensions. Mr Blair then won a return shindig on the matter of Labour Party leadership.

Nor need we fret about the high level of heckling thrown at Mr Cameron by the Labour benches. As leader of the Opposition he must expect a measure of hoo-hah. His own MPs bray at Mr Blair, after all.

Mr Cameron showed himself able to return the compliment. His first remarks on pensions were interrupted by the well-fed Labour veteran, ken purchase (Wolverhampton NE).

Mr Cameron swivelled in Mr Purchase's direction and immediately pointed out that although old Ken is in line for a fat parliamentary pension not all Britons are so fortunate.

A balloon pricked, will go pppfffarrting off into the distance. Mr Purchase did much the same.

But none of this need trouble us. What was rank about Speaker Martin's behaviour occurred later when two LibDems tried  to speak.

The first was Norman Baker (lewes), Mr Baker is , one may assert with confidence, the MP least popular with fellow parliamentarians.

WHY?

-because he is a bore with a comb-over haircut?

NO

-it is because Mr Baker believes MPs pocket too much public money

[YOUR MONEY]

He thinks they should be open, particularly on the matter of expenses. many MPs therefore think him a traitor

The moment he stood to ask his pre-allotted question, Labour MPs started to scream. Among them, you may not be surprised to hear, was a certain Ken Purchase, fresh-emboldened by the

[RAT] PACK HOWLING ALL AROUND

THE NOISE WAS ASTONISHING

Even though Mr Baker had a microphone nearby his voice was lost in the clamour.

There were shouts of 'prat' and 'cheer up, Norman' and 'oh no! and 'siddown'.

Bending as near low to the loudspeaker I caught only tiny snatches of Mr Baker's question.

IT CONCERNED THE POWERS

OF

AN OVER MIGHTY STATE

Given the noise, Mr Baker was understandably taking it slowly. Too long!' yelled Labour voices. there must have been

100 MPS

-shouting at him, some going red in the face.

Come, come, you say, it was only a bit of fun.

I DON'T AGREE

I suggest it must have been physically frightening for Mr Baker to stand there, separated only by a few feet from so many top-volume voices and so much flying spittle.

Mr Blair could not hear clearly what was going on. Nor could the Speaker. He was screwing up his eyes and leaning towards his own loudspeakers.

SO WHY DID MR MARTIN NOT CALL

ORDER!

Why did he nor stop the thugs?

Was it not his duty to do so?

A few minutes later Simon Hughes (LibDem, N Southwark) had the floor. He, too, was heckled beyond any acceptable level. Labour MPs even hissed him.

HISSED!

He was asking a serious question about pensions.

DO LABOUR VOTERS EXPECT THEIR TRIBUNES TO HISS SUCH QUESTIONS?

Again, Mr Speaker let this happen, WORSE, he sided actively with the hecklers when he told Mr Hughes (who had been struggling with the interruptions)

THAT HIS QUESTION HAD GONE ON TOO LONG

Just moments earlier the same Speaker had allowed a sycophantic Labour MP , Kitty Ussher (Burnley) to ask a question that was at least as long.

Some partisans claim that I dislike Speaker Martin because he is a working-class Scot.

BALLS!

I disapprove of him because he is

INCOMPETENT

AND

POSSIBLY EVEN A BIASED BULLY

HE IS A BLIGHT ON PARLIAMENT

A BLOCKAGE IN THE WORKS

A BAR TO A FAIR AND HONEST

POLITICS.

[WE AGREE-THE MAN IS A SLOBBERING IDIOT AS ARE THOSE WHO 'S SPITTLE DISHONOURS THE VENERABLE PLACE THEY ARE UNWORTHY TO ENTER. THE ANGER OF THE THUGGISH EXCUSES FOR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PEOPLE IS NOT HARD TO EXPLAIN. THEY KNOW THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED AND HAVE LOST THEIR CONTROL. THEIR CONSTITUENTS SHOULD SEE THEY RECEIVE THEIR JUST DESSERTS - ON THE DOLE

TAKING WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE PAST TEN YEARS THEY ALL CERTAINLY ARE INDEED

MAD PARLIAMENTS.]

*

[OVER OUR LONG PARLIAMENTARY HISTORY MANY MEN OF INTEGRITY AND HONOUR HAVE MADE IT THEIR LIFE'S WORK TO SERVE

 THE PEOPLE.]

*          *          *

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

H.F.1030
 

SO WILL BRITAIN ONE DAY BE  MUSLIM?

by

Ruth Dudley Edwards

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

*

Our failure to have children.

Welfarism.

Political Correctness.

And a

LACK of WILL

 to fight Islamic extremism

 

 

 

THIS WEEK has been another terrible one for those of us who want a society in which all races, religions and cultures mix to their mutual advantage and

ENRICHMENT.

On Tuesday, five men were sentenced to life in prison for plotting to use a huge fertiliser bomb in what would have been the UK's largest mass murder.

Omar Khyam, Salahuddin Amin, Anthony Garciaand Jawa Akbar -first and second generation immigrants - responded to the tolerance of the British people

BY TRYING TO KILL AS MANY OF THEM AS POSSIBLE.

It is absurd to hope that the exposure of their evil after a 13-month trial which cost an estimated

£50,000,000

-has finally provided the wake-up call that this slumbering country so badly needs?

I'm one of those old-fashioned immigrants to this country who feels passionately grateful, is proudly British (as well as Irish -having been born in Dublin) and believes that immigrants have more duties than rights. And further, that one of those is to adjust to British society rather than expecting it to adjust to them. [ has been the practice for some decades but more so during the Blair years.]

However, one aspect of contemporary British society which I refuse to adjust to is its weakness in the face of the

ENEMY WITHIN

In my many conversations with like-minded people about the threat that radical Islam poses to the

 BRITISH WAY OF LIFE

-And indeed, to European civilisation -we frequently end by despairingly agreeing that the

WEST

-seems intention committing

POLITICAL and CULTURAL

SUICIDE.

When we look starkly at the demographic statistics, the wimpishness of our

ESTABLISHMENT

-in the face of the

THREAT

-the perversions perpetuated by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-and our passivity, it's hard to avoid the

CONCLUSION

-that within a couple of generations

ISLAM

-will be in

CONTROL of EUROPE

And before anyone says that there nothing wrong if this happened, since the vast majority of

MUSLIMS

are tolerant people who would not dream of interfering with

OUR WAY OF LIFE

-it's necessary  to point out that in

MUSLIM COUNTRIES

, it's usually the radicals and extremists

MULLAHS

-who regard

TOLERANCE

AS A VICE

-WHO MAKE THE RUNNING.

This occurs too in microcosm in

MUSLIM GHETTOS

around

EUROPE

We saw the frightening fundamentalist fringe of

ISLAM

-marching, threatening and perpetuating violence over the cartoons depicting

MOHAMMAD

IN

DENMARK

while the majority of Muslims - who, yes, of course are tolerant and decent - kept their mouths shut and stayed at

HOME

YES, Islam may be a great religion. BUT

-in its fundamentalist version, some of its values are antipathetic to ours, and if they triumph in

EUROPE 

-they will

THREATEN OUR VALUES

such as

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

and

SPEECH

and the spirit of intellectual inquiry that made

EUROPEAN CIVILISATION

Great and Prosperous

 

The danger of ending up like these poor, despotic and medieval

Islamic States

-in which millions live miserably is the prospect that

CHRISTIANS

HINDUS

MODERATE MUSLIMS and NON-BELIEVERS -should be uniting

TO PREVENT

 

BUT THE TRUTH IS WE ARE DOING LITTLE TO STOP IT.

Consider first a few chilling statistics.

EUROPEANS ARE FAILING TO REPRODUCE

[Yet in our own island millions of potential citizens have been 

SLAUGHTERED AT BIRTH

thanks to David Steels -Abortion Bill of 1965?

It is still taking place in 2007 though there is NOW an  growing awareness of the tragedy to the potential mother and to society in general that many more doctors today are refusing to condone the

MURDER.

Recently the sight of full grown foetuses being deprived of their lives has now brought the horror and injustice of the action to destroy life.

In an age of contraception of many devices and anti-life pills it is unbelievable that any potential mother was unable to take the necessary steps to prevent conception.

David Steels Bill was to prevent back-street abortions and he himself a few ears ago voiced his concern as to what has happened over the years since.]

*

Consider  first a few chilling statistics.

Europeans are failing to reproduce. Just to keep the population steady, you need 2.1 births per women

[This is a case for Government action by offering cash and other vital services to enable the reluctant mother to do her best for her community and country.]

However in 2005, the European average was 1.38.

In Ireland it was 1.9

France it was 1.89

Germany 1.35

Italy 1.23

Britain scored in the middle of this range with 1.6

BUT

That was because - like France - we have a large

MUSLIM POPULATION

with a high birth rate. Indeed,

MUSLIMS

are out breeding

 non-Muslims

through out

 EUROPE

 

 

[Many of whom have absolutely no intention of integrating -

Thank you very much Mr Blair -we don't think so.]

'Just look at the development within Europe.'

said a triumphant Norwegian Imam a few months ago

'where the number of

MUSLIMS

is expanding like mosquitoes.

Every Western women in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim women in the same countries is producing an average of 3.5 children.

'OUR WAY OF THINKING WILL PROVE MORE POWERFUL THAN YOURS' he said.

The big question this poses is:

WHY ARE WE NOT REPRODUCING?

There are many reasons, but probably the most important are the decline of religion and the liberation of women.

[The populations which have the stronger religious stance will be the eventual rulers of Europe. It can be a Christian Europe or a Muslim Europe. The Governments of Europe and the shrinking United Kingdom have to decide.]

In Ireland, when the Roman Catholic Church effectively ran society, sex for procreation, contraceptives were banned, the normal size for a family was around five or six children, bur 12 or 13 were not uncommon.

As the country embraced secularism in the 1980s, birth rates plummeted, exacerbated by the new -found confidence of women that made them choose careers rather than domesticity.

WHEREAS in the 1970s, I was regarded in both the UK and Ireland as odd for being married but voluntarily childless, these days, childlessness |

IS A COMMON CHOICE

It is a world where one-child families abound and to have more than two children is to be regarded as eccentric and probably environmentally irresponsible.

Moreover, the erosion of family life and the long - hours culture place a heavy burden on those prepared to rear the next generation.

Despite these social forces, even in the UK, devote Muslims and Orthodox Jews obey instructions to have large families.

Confronted with this demographic revolution and official statistics which showed there were too few young people to support an ageing population, European governments decided to embrace

IMMIGRATION

-as an inherent good without any thought for the consequences.

As a result, politicians and businessmen assured us that we had to have economic growth in n order to prop up ever greater public spending and that it could be provided only by importing large numbers of workers from abroad

BUT WHY WASN'T THERE A NATIONAL DEBATE

ABOUT

Whether it was wise to mortgage our cultural future for the sake of a mess of financial pottage?

[A recent report on the cost  and benefit of large scale

IMMIGRATION

estimated that the country benefited by

ONLY - 50p

 for each migrant]

Where were the politicians arguing against the doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow

ILLEGITIMATE

Who among the liberal elite's commentariat were challenging the moral relativism that flew in the face of

SENSE and SENSIBILITY

-by insisting that the culture of

Shakespeare

The King James Bible

Keats's poetry

Turner's paintings

and

Elgar's music

-was no more important than - the cultures of other

IMPORTED MINORITIES?

 

We know the answer all too well.

Cries of racism drowned out rational argument - not just here but throughout

OLD EUROPE

As one gloomster put it:

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which is thought what

SENTIMENTALITY is to COMPASSION

-means that the intelligentsia of the

WEST

-has disarmed itself in advance of any possible struggle.

The result of all this, as recent events have made tragically clear, was that

BRITISH CULTURE

-was

UNDERMINED and SOCIAL COHESION

DAMAGED.

Separated from mainstream society by geographical and cultural apartheid, which has been fostered by

MULTICULTURALISM

-many immigrants were denied the chance to

INTEGRATE.

 

AND, INSTEAD OF BEING TOLD BY THE HOST COMMUNITY

THAT IF THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ADHERE

-to the values of a liberal, pluralist democracy, they should

RETURN HOME

They were asked how they would like

BRITAIN

-to conform to

THEIR VALUES.

THE STORY WAS VERY MUCH THE SAME THROUGHOUT EUROPE

The robust American political commentator Mark Steyn, a disillusioned Anglophile has already written us off. The thesis of his Blackly comic book,

*

America Alone:

The End Of The World As We Know It

*

-is that the U.S. will survive because the

RELIGIOUS RIGHT ARE CONFIDENT

 AND

 REPRODUCE

BUT

 THAT EUROPE IS FINISHED

Its not just demographic decline, he says, it's also the unsustainability of the

MODERN WELFARE STATE

-in which we depend so much on our own individual resources.

We are also, he believes, suffering from 'civilisational exhaustion':

CULTURAL DISINTEGRATION

-brought about by

BIG GOVERNMENT

[Or if you prefer BIG BROTHER]

-which has fatally

DESTROYED OUR SENSE OF SELF-RELIANCE.

 

MEANWHILE, we are importing large numbers of unemployed youths from abroad in order to maintain

OUR

STANDARD OF LIVING

Yet many of these newcomers have nothing

BUT

CONTEMPT

 FOR OUR

WAY OF LIFE

-and some even wish

TO DESTROY IT

Steyn sees this as a

CIVIL WAR

which

EUROPE

-is too timid even to acknowledge - let alone

LET ALONE WIN

[This is something the Tory Mr Oliver Letwin or as we have said on a number of occasions Mr Let-them-win -and they will, who appears to be out of touch with the real issues that matter to our country in the early years of the 21st century.]

Mr Steyn says:

'Islam has youth and WILL

Europe has age and WELFARE.'

It's hard not to agree with Mark Steyn, especially as every day seems to bring more evidence

THAT AS A SOCIETY

WE ARE TERMINALLY

MAD

For example, this week's fertiliser bomb trial had heard that the key plotters had been radicalised by the hate preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed whom the judge condemned as

'a master of cowardice -who works in the shadows.'

This was the same firebrand who as an asylum -seeker here, had pocketed

£275,000

-in Welfare benefits.

[It is the same mentality shown by

Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer and many others

-who instead of spending the £32 million allocated for building prisons a few years ago are now doing almost anything in order to keep thousands of criminals many repeat offenders and dangerous, out of prison and giving many early release so they can go back to torment their victims and as has happened in a number of occasions returned to have another go at their robbery or other offence knowing that the worst that might happen is either a holiday or community service or whatever  and as many prisons these days are very much like 5star hotels there will be no hardship encountered if they are so lucky to win the prison admission lottery -then it will be a nice break to see old friends and anyway they will be out before they have completed their degree in political science or whatever.

The victims of crime, many of them elderly - poor and lonely won't as a rule be free of fear of their tormentor returning for a second or even third try to rob them of the little they have  and as has happened even assault and kill the defenceless pensioner - but some victims even lose heart and end their own lives by depriving themselves of food because they have lost hope that they can be safe again and we have their so-called protectors such as The Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer the new 'Justice' Minister ? who says 'Jail's the wrong place for burglars' and others who are doing whatever they can to keep the criminals out of jail. If the Army can put up a temporary  barracks in double quick time then there would be spaces for all the thousands of criminals who should be

OUT OF THE COMMUNITY.

Of course there would be complaints that the conditions are not up to the standards of the 5star prisons that they have 'visited' over the years and anyway there is

Tony Blair's

1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

to keep them out of such uncomfortable surroundings which would not provide the 'key' service which has been introduced with their friendly solicitor providing a drugs service as an extra comfort.

THERE IS NO LONGER JUSTICE AS THE SENTENCE DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME

ANYMORE]

*

To continue:

Despite all this, I still believe there are grounds for hope - largely because Muslim hotheads have overplayed their hand by blowing people up, rioting in their neighbourhoods or broadcasting hate -filled speeches which alienate them from the host community.

*

 

[Well we are of the opinion that until the Government shows to the Muslim population that they will not give way on insisting that ALL newcomers and those already with us conform to

OUR RULE OF LAW

 

-and punish without hesitation any breaches of the Law and make it plain that anyone who is a threat to our country WILL BE extradited. BUT of course we have Tony Blair's 1998 Human Rights Act and articles within the 1951 British led Convention of Human Rights which will need amending.

It should be made quite clear that those who have no intention to

INTEGRATE

-should be reminded of their commitment which they gave when they where granted immigration or asylum status (which should be a legal requirement in the future)

Unless drastic action is taken by the next Prime Minister as a priority , future generations of the indigenous population will find themselves foreigners in their own country with their religion and culture under growing  threat. The evidence is before our eyes it is a warning of what the future will bring if action is not taken

QUICKLY AND DECISIVELY

Those moderate Muslims will at last feel secure in the knowledge that they are safe from the extremist influence which up to now they have had it all their own way. By our commitment

IT WILL BE SECURITY THROUGH STRENGTH OF PURPOSE AND THE MUSLIMS WILL BE WITH US

Continue as NOW and they will have nothing but contempt for our indecision and inadequate moral integrity.]

*

To continue:

The sharp-suited, soft spoken undercover agents of the

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

-the banned Egyptian group whose former members include Osma Bin Laden -understand that power is best secured by

STEALTH

by infiltrating institutions and seducing the

MEDIA

Libya's Colonel Gaddafi once exemplified this policy

He said:

'There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe -without swords, without guns-without conquests. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.'

 

[AND THEY SURE MEAN IT]

 

 

[Our survival as a Christian nation can only be achieved by the Government reversing it's abhorrent legislation as to Religious freedom of speech and action because not to do so further emphasises to the extremist elements in our country that we are WEAK and AMORAL nation and therefore ready for conversion by stealth as their numbers obtain the victory while we ignore our Christian past at our peril.

Our close relations to America must be strengthened particularly in the moral arena so that our nations will gain the grudging respect of those who have a desire to replace our Christian heritage with their own.

There will be many who will say that we live in a secular environment and that the Government of the day should not concern itself but we have no choice we either support our Institutions and that includes our Christian inheritance which is ingrained into the very fabric of our nation or  lose that priceless heirloom the foundation of our IDENTITY and accept another more fanatical regime who do not believe in toleration but only in the observance of their one and only deliverer who will have no other faiths before it.

WE HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE

-because a vacuum must be filled and it is better that we know what contain.

The Choice Is Yours!

-but better it will be to retain our own heritage than be converted to another.]

*

But the violent extremists have provoked some signs of a backlash, not just among indigenous populations of Europe but among those tolerant immigrants who value the countries

THAT TOOK THEM IN

The Swedes, of all people, whom liberals claimed had produced a perfect society, are trying to row back on the

WELFARE STATE

-to encourage the

WORK ETHIC

and are demanding

THAT IMMIGRANTS INTEGRATE

 

Nyamko Sabuni a female, Muslim, African immigrant who is now the country's

INTEGRATION and EQUALITY

MINISTER

-insists that

ALL IMMIGRANTS

-should learn Swedish and find a job.

 

She is also intent on criminalising

FORCED MARRIAGES

CHECKING GIRLS FOR EVIDENCE OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION

and

BANNING THE VEIL

as well as

STATE FUNDING

for RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.

[This is an area that needs the new Premier Gordon Brown to put his attention as to make it plain that their is one

RULE OF LAW

in

ENGLAND

[NO EXCEPTIONS FOR MUSLIMS OR ANYONE ELSE IN OUR COUNTRY]

 

 

*          *          *

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

*  July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/

 

The  Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

*

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS

WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

 

[In September 2017 with successive governments dilly dalling and shilly-shalling on a major demographic issue in our island history of INTEGRATION of MILLIONS of MUSLIMS into a historically CHRISTIAN BASED SOCIETY albeit though no longer a significant presence which has left a MORAL VOID which will be filled by those from another CULTURE -LAW and HISTORY.  Whether  it be a moderate ISLAM now depends on the actions of the present and future governments. The signs are not hopeful with the Government preferring the favour of the HARD fundamentalist SAUDI ARABIA whose brand of ISLAM is counter to that of moderate MUSLIM CLERICS  here who over the past decades have protested that the government of the day is too lackadaisical and therefore preventing the FULL INTEGRATION of ALL MUSLIMS in our once settled ISLAND HOME.  The Daily Mail has stated that approximately 60% of MUSLIMS  (180,000) refuse to INTEGRATE. It is about time that the GOVERNMENT made it clear that CITIZENSHIP is ONLY AVAILABLE to THOSE WHO INTEGRATE.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1030
 
July 19, 2016

 

A MATTER OF FACT

 

5 facts about the Muslim population in Europe

By -509 comments

Recent killings in Paris as well as the arrival of hundreds of thousands of mostly Muslim refugees in Europe have drawn renewed attention to the continent’s Muslim population. In many European countries, including France, Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, concerns about growing Muslim communities have led to calls for restrictions on immigration. But just how large is Europe’s Muslim population, and how fast is it growing?

Muslim population in EuropeUsing the Pew Research Center’s most recent population estimates, here are five facts about the size and makeup of the Muslim population in Europe:

1Germany and France have the largest Muslim populations among European Union member countries. As of 2010, there were 4.8 million Muslims in Germany (5.8% of the country’s population) and 4.7 million Muslims in France (7.5%). In Europe overall, however, Russia’s population of 14 million Muslims (10%) is the largest on the continent.

2The Muslim share of Europe’s total population has been increasing steadily. In recent decades, the Muslim share of the population throughout Europe grew about 1 percentage point a decade, from 4% in 1990 to 6% in 2010. This pattern is expected to continue through 2030, when Muslims are projected to make up 8% of Europe’s population.

3Muslims are younger than other Europeans. In 2010, the median age of Muslims throughout Europe was 32, eight years younger than the median for all Europeans (40). By contrast, the median age of religiously unaffiliated people in Europe, including atheists, agnostics and those with no religion in particular, was 37. The median age of European Christians was 42.

4Views of Muslims vary widely across European countries. A Pew Research Center survey conducted this spring in 10 nations found that in eastern and southern Europe, negative views prevailed. However, the majority of respondents in the UK, Germany, France, Sweden and the Netherlands gave Muslims a favorable rating. Views about Muslims are tied to ideology. While 47% of Germans on the political right give Muslims an unfavorable rating, just 17% on the left do so. The gap between left and right is also roughly 30 percentage points in Italy and Greece. 

5As of 2010, the European Union was home to about 13 million Muslim immigrants. The foreign-born Muslim population in Germany is primarily made up of Turkish immigrants, but also includes many born in Kosovo, Iraq, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Morocco. The roughly 3 million foreign-born Muslims in France are largely from France’s former colonies of Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia.

Note: This is an update of a post originally published on Jan. 15, 2015. 

Category: 5 Facts

Topics: Europe, Muslims and Islam

  1. Photo of Conrad Hackett
    is a demographer focusing on religion at Pew Research Center.

509 Comments

JUNE 6-2017

ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF D-DAY -JUNE6-1944 -THE BREAKTHROUGH INTO NAZI-CONTROLLED EUROPE AND ITS LEGACY OF THE NAZI-PLANNED EU WHICH 17 MILLION UK CITIZENS ON JUNE 23-2016 VOTED FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR FREEDOM CULTURE AND COUNTRY.

MILLIONS DIED IN TWO WORLD WARS TO PROTECT THE ENGLISH CULTURE AND CONSTITUTION AND ITS RETURN MUST BE SOONER THAN LATER!

H.F.1216 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 19-2017

H .F. 1283 - BREXIT INDEPENDENCE DAY-APRIL 1-2019

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Quentin Letts 

-Yesterday in Parliament.

[1295 -1972 

A FREE PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY

(CAPTIVITY WITHIN THE NAZI PLANNED FOURTH REICH)-

JANUARY 1-1973-JUNE 23-2016

*

March 16 - 2017 ...]

 

Dear EU,

 were off now, love from the people of the UK.

DAILY MAIL-Quentin Letts-Dear EU, we're off now, love from the people of the UK

LACKLUSTRE exchanges between the Leader of the House and his Shadow were interupted by the Speaker, John Bercow. He had an announcement to savour.

The hour, by the Commons digital clock, was 10.46 and 16 seconds.

'Order, Just before we proceed with the Business Question I have to notify the house, in accordance with the

ROYAL ASSENT ACT 1967

that Her Majesty has signified

HER ROYAL ASSENT

to the following Acts...

The Remain-voting Speaker continued, with apparent boredom:

'Supply and Appropriation (Anticipation and Adjustments) Act 2017;

EUROPEAN UNION

(NOTIFICATION OF WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2017.

 

Full article

 

[COMMENT S IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1149 FREEDOM -FULL STEAM AHEAD!

*  *  *

 

WHERE DID SHE GET THE HAT?

A DAY TO REMEMBER

We saw MRS May in her new head apparel we became aware that the spirit of an IRON LADY was again alive in our Brittanic land.

As in the past, when it was necessay to protect her own, in PEACE and WAR

then Britania would again Rule the Waves to protect HER OWN wherever THEY MAY BE.

AS in the recent past we are again in a BATTLE to recover our PAST.

WE face a time of UNCERTAINTY yet our HISTORY has shown on many occasions that even a TEMPORY SET-BACK leads inevitably to VICTORY.

We have been many times in our LONG HISTORY experienced the THREAT from across the soon to be returned ENGLISH CHANNEL which has as in the days when we had a WOODEN WALL protecting our then FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the days of ALFRED the GREAT through the ELISABETHAN TIME and from a number of attempted INVASIONS since.

But we must REMEMBER that our OWN PARLIAMENT allowed our GREATEST ENEMY GERMANY who after we had suffered TWO WORLD WARS from HER HANDS permitted our FREE NATION STATE in 1972 to sign an ACT of SURRENDER we would call it TREASON which will be finally ERADICATED from our COMMONS JOURNAL within the NEXT FEW DAYS.

At this crucial time in our NATIONS HISTORY we  must remember WHO WE ARE and WHAT WE ARE as a PEOPLE and the message from the past from the TIME of the HEROIC ALFRED the GREAT to the REIGN of our QUEEN BESS- ELISABETH THE FIRST of ENGLAND  who at the sign of an INVADER spoke the words that inspired HER PEOPLE:

 

Elizabeth reviewed her troops at Tilbury.

'My loving people,' she said, we have been persuaded by some that are careful of our safety to take head how we commit ourselves to armed multitudes, for fear of treachery; but I assure you I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful and loving people

LET TYRANTS FEAR!

I have always so behaved myself that , under God, I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects; and therefore am I come amongst you, as you see,

AT THIS TIME

-to lay down my life for my God

AND FOR MY KINGDOM

and for

MY PEOPLE

MY HONOUR

and

MY BLOOD

even in the dust.

I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble women;

BUT I HAVE A HEART OF A KING

and of a

KING of ENGLAND

too, and I think foul scorn that Parma or Spain,

or any

PRINCE of EUROPE

SHOULD DARE TO INVADE THE BORDERS OF MY REALM.'

[S.R. Gardiner-Outline of English History

 to more recent times when a VOICE of DETERMINATION from our greatest WAR LEADER -WINSTON CHURCHILL inspired the NATION with his momentous stirring SPEECH:

You ask, What is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory-victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. May 1940 .

*

FREEDOM

All we have of freedom-all we use and know-This our Fathers bought for us, long and long ago

Kipling. The Old Issue

*

We must be free or die, who speak the tongue

That Shakespeare spoke; the faith and morals hold

Which Milton held.

Wordsworth. Sonnets

*

MARCH 14 - 2017

TREASON

Conservative skulduggery

BACK in 1972 -Tories desert to EU camp

SHORT-TERM SELF-INTEREST EXPLOITED

The UK Accession Bill passed its Third reading on 13th July 1972 by a majority of 17.

Earlier, the debate on the Second reading had lasted for four days (16-19 February), with the Labour Party then officially committed to opposing the legislation. BUT, as happened with the Maastricht Bill two decades later, as Christopher Booker and Richard North observe, 'faced with the possible collapse of their Government, most of the Conservative 'anti-marketeers gritted their teeth' (treacherously, short-sighted and very foolishly -Ed.) 'and walked through the 'aye' lobby. Despite that, 15 Tories voted with the Opposition. TRAITOR

Edward Heath

 got his vote, but only by a water-thin margin:

309 to 301'.

 

 

Tony Benn MP commented after the passage of the Third Reading that

 ‘it was a coup d’etat by a political class who did not believe in popular sovereignty’.

 

Actually, it was worse than that .\It was the start of a coup d’etat by installments’ by a corrupted political class initially led by two operatives-Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon,

 both of whom were recruited German agents  (like Lenin, Rasputin and Lavrentii Beria in the Soviet context, before them) who signed the UK Accession Treaty in exchange for corrupt payments.  Both lied to the British people; and the authors specifically identified one of Geoffrey Rippon’ s worst lies, associated with the alienation of Britain’s fishing waters, the richest in the world.  Here it is worth citing the whole of the authors’ relevant paragraph:

 ‘Desperate to hide how much had been conceded[over fisheries], Geoffrey Rippon…said:

 ‘I must emphasise that these are not just transitional arrangements [in the relevant context, allegedly beneficial to the British fisheries-Ed.]

 which automatically lapse at the end of a fixed period’.  This claim drew fierce challenge from Dennis Healey and Peter Shore[later Lord Shore –further details on EDP bulletin board] both of whom suspected he was lying. 

 What neither had yet seen was the wording of the UK Accession Treaty, which MP’s would not be allowed to examine until after the treaty was signed a month later.  Only when this became available [and Heath and Rippon had accepted their bribes-Ed.]  was it clear that Rippon had told a blatant lie’. [Booker and North, op.cit., page 155]

 International Currency Review

 October 10-2005

 Notes and References:

 ‘Obituary of Sir Edward Heath, the Prime Minister who took Britain into the EEC and presided over constant turmoil at home’,

1. The Daily Telegraph, 18th July 2005.

This was probably the rudest obituary of a prominent UK statesman ever to have appeared in print.  Even so, it omitted any reference to Heath’s recruitment by German (Nazi) intelligence.   However , there are many [coded] references in this obituary, not least the three telling words:

‘He never married’, which observers accurately interpret as meaning that he was homosexual, and therefore an obvious recruitment/blackmail target.

 

2. The Daily Telegraph, 24th July 2005,

 

Christopher Booker (Column),

 

International Currency Review

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 A PATRIOT AND TRUTH-SEEKER

The EDP received in 2005 vital information on the EU from Mr Christopher Story which enabled the EDP to mount a continuing offensive to spread the TRUTH of the EVILS of such a BEAST! which came into existence through LIES! and DECEIT! and as Mr Story has stated in VOLUME 30 NUMBER 4 -the TWIN EVILS of the EU are:-

COLLECTIVISATION AND CORRUPTION.

[What the REMAINERS failed to understand]

These two evils always go together: they did so under overt Communism, when the whole world saw how corrupt the Communist nomenclature was: and they go together under covert communism, notably the version manifested by the

 

 THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE [ 26 ]  .

 

EACH LETTER ABOVE HAS A CHRISTOPHER STORY BULLETIN-TOTAL 26

which the top Soviet intelligence operative Mikhail Gorbachev described on 23rd March 2000, as 'the new European Soviet' It is accordingly a conspicuous waste of time for well-meaning national policymakers, and for the rapidly dwindling class of Euro-ideologues to recommend 'reform' of the EU INSTITUTIONS. They are incapable of reform, because, as we reveal exclusively in this issue, they are born of CORRUPTION- and because the TREATIES that 'sustain' them were procured by means of CORRUPT 'BLack' payments.'

*

More!

 
 

H.F.1150 FREEDOM NOW

H.F.1144 FREEDOM NOW

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017--       - (1994 -Official Website-AUGUST-2017 ) -   JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017-PT1 -

 

SEPTEMBER- FREEDOM NOW PART 2

 

BACK TO:

 
BREXIT

ANNOUNCEMENT

ARTICLE 50 LETTER

DELIVERED BY

'HER MAJESTY'S AMBASSADOR

TO

BRUSSELS

ON

MARCH 29-2017

*

ON

THE FINAL STRETCH

 TO

 FREEDOM

OF THE

PEOPLE AND NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

[TIME ELAPSED SINCE REFERENDUM IN JUNE-2016

  13 MONTHS

 

 AUG-2017- AUG-2019 (?)

 

AUG 23-2017.

 

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

SHORT CUT TO EXIT EU NEWS

eu latest news on brexit

latest news eu

eu latest immigration news

eu news now

eu news today

europe news headlines

eu germany latest

eu news germany

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 
 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

      9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA
LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND
SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND
100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

 THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT:

April 20, 2017

Why the saboteurs should simmer down

Like the mating dance of the warthog, a must-see ritual of the natural world is the British Left throwing a fit of the vapours over a headline in the Mail. The latest to provoke hysteria was our front-page summary of why Theresa May called for a snap election: 'Crush the saboteurs.'

'Nasty and divisive!' tweeted Labour's IRA, Hamas and Hezbollah-sympathising John McDonnell (look who's talking!). 'This kind of hate and aggression is the last thing the country needs,' whimpered the ever-smug tax avoider Gary Lineker.

'Fascist!' said a Guardianista. 'Stalinist!' opined another, with some halfwit tweeting: 'Stalin killed millions by labelling people saboteurs and enemies of the people. Literally the same words as the Mail. Chilling.' Not for the first time, this paper advises: calm down, dears.

For the avoidance of doubt, neither the PM nor this peace-loving paper proposes genocide. All that Mrs May plans, with our support, is an election to establish her mandate for pressing on with

BREXIT

(backed by 52 per cent)

without further frustration from 'game-playing' Remoaners and an unelected second chamber.

As for the word 'saboteurs', how else to describe a Labour Party which has threatened to vote against a final agreement with the EU? Or Lib Dems who say they want to grind government to a standstill? Or Scots Nats who say they'll vote against legislation repealing our EU membership?

If they don't like being called saboteurs, shouldn't they give up the sabotage?

And how striking that many who criticised the Mail were the very same people who likened Mrs May's call for an election to the move by Turkey's human rights-violating dictator, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to increase his powers. What a contemptibly stupid and offensive comparison.

We have long known the Left demonises anyone with whom it disagrees. But this is getting ridiculous.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4427192/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-saboteurs-simmer-down.html#ixzz4eo141qsw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  
[A PROCLAMATION

FOR

 ENGLAND'S

 FREEDOM AND FUTURE.

 

COUNTDOWN TO SUCCESS

ON

JUNE 8-2017

WE REMIND REMOANERS-PARTICULARLY MPs THAT BREXIT IS ABOUT FREEDOM-CULTURE AND COUNTRY-AND PROSPERITY WITHIN A WIDER WORLD OF OPPORTUNITY

NOT ABOUT IF YOU COULD LOSE YOUR JOB OR BUSINESS OR EU HANDOUTS-

PAID FOR BY ENGLISH TAXPAYERS MAINLY IN THE SOUTH EAST OF ENGLAND.]

*

     

    Tory manifesto will guarantee end

     

     

     

    of

     

     

     

     

    free movement

     

     

     

     

    ++

     

     

     

     

     

     UK to leave Single Market

     

     

     

     

     ++

     

     

     

     

     

     No more

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    meddling by Euro Judges

     

     

     

     

     

     

    by

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Jason Groves-Political Editor | Daily

     

     

    Mail Online

     

     

    THERESA'S CAST-IRON

    BREXIT

    PLEDGES

     

     

     

     

     

    THERESA MAY will place a triple lock on Brexit  in the Tory manifesto to STOP OBSTRUCTION

     

     

    by

     

     

    DIEHARD REMAINERS

     

    Tory sources say she is set to include specific pledges to overcome opposition within her party and in the Lords.

    The manifesto is expected to commit the Conservatives to ending

     

    EU FREE MOVEMENT

     

    and pulling out of both the

    SINGLE MARKET

    and

    EUROPEAN COURT of JUSTICE

    Senior Tories see these three measures as essential in delivering last year's referendum result

    [Mrs May's Pledge that

    BREXIT means BREXIT

     is MET!]

     

    Full article

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    April 20-2017

     

     

     

    Brexit boost as US Speaker backs

     

     

     

     

    free trade deal with

     

     

     

    UK

     

     

     

     

    ... - Daily Mail

     

     

     

    by Jack Doyle Executive Political Editorl

     

     

     

    THERESA MAY received a major boost last night after a

     

    leading US politician backed a swift free

     

    trade deal with the UK

     

    Paul Ryan, the Speaker of the House of

     

    Representatives and a senior member of

     

    Donald Trump's Republican party, said

     

     

    Washington wanted to strike a free trade

     

     

     

    deal with BRITAIN as soon as possible.

     

     

     

    In a speech to the Policy Exchange think-tank

     

    in Central London, Mr Ryan said such

     

     

    a deal would 'further tap into the great

     

    potential between our

     

    TWO PEOPLE...

     

     

    Full article

     

     

    April 20-2017

     

     

     

    QUENTIN LETTS: Mrs May enjoying

     

     

     

    power for first time | Daily Mail ...

     

    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/.../QUENTIN-LETTS-Mrs May-enjoying-power-

    time.html

    18 hours ago ... It's not just the new hairstyle. Mrs May is glowing. For the

    first time, she's is really enjoying power, writes QUENTIN LETTS.

    By Quentin Letts for ...
     

     

    Full article

     

    April 20-2017
*

H.F. 1175 FREEDOM AND A FUTURE LINKED TO THE PAST!
 

 

 ["ENGLAND'S GREEN

 AND PLEASANT LAND."]

*

Letter from Daily Mail, Wednesday, September 20,2017

Houses on land like this will just force prices up.

 [and DESTROY more GREEN BELT- a SACRILEGE and BETRAYAL of a PROMISE not only to the present population but to future generations. It is past and present politicians to BLAME because of the massive INCREASE in POPULATION into our small and once spacious island home. This grievous mistake can be corrected by controlled immigration and finding the financial resources to ensure that those millions of elderly pensions -many alone in their 3/4 bed-roomed homes can downsize to  more suitable properties which will enhance their remaining days in calm comfort and security.]

 Below: Letter from David Brown, Stonesfield,Oxon

'CALLS for thousands of homes to be built in the leafiest areas 9Mail) show our politicians are out of touch. They concentrate on the number of houses with no regard to type, style, mix, location and infrastructure .'

[Evidence of this practice is everywhere to be seen-it is an abomination to view the collectivist trend of design which instead of enhancing the neighbourhood is an imposing eyesore of an affront to the individualistic nature and particular character of the existing locality with many centuries of history in its making.]

'In West Oxfordshire, half of any development above ten houses has to be social and affordable housing. As developers receive only the cost price  for building these homes, they have to make their profit from the other 50 per cent and so build only four and five-bedroom houses.

In my village, such new homes cost between £695,000 and £1.2 million. This means that the only two and three bedroom houses being built are SOCIAL or affordable housing, but not all young couples or families meet this criteria.

There are no bungalows suitable for downsizing or to meet the needs of the elderly or disabled people [Theresa May in her incoming speech as PM gave an undertaking to look after the PEOPLE! and this issue is a perfect example how to look after-'ALL THE PEOPLE!' and at the same time to protect our beautiful COUNTRYSIDE  and COUNTRY for future generations-a  sacred TRUST! And for millions of elderly pensioners trapped in three/four bedroom properties to allow them to downsize to BUNGALOWS will release family properties-always in short supply-and bring CALM. COMFORT and SECURITY to those in the winter of their days. The issue can no longer be burked!]

Developers will build anywhere they can get land, so some new estates will not have PUBLIC TRANSPORT and the residents will have to rely solely on their cars using OVERCROWDED roads.

Despite representations to local planners are soley driven by Government quotas. Communities Secretary Sajid Javid's proposal to force more UNSUITABLE HOUSING onto areas such as WEST OXFORDSHIRE will have the unintended consequences of not only DESTROYING AREAS of OUTSTANDING NATURAL BEAUTY but will force up PRICES.

Rather than have more pointless consultations to promote the Government's desired outcome, Mr Javid should visit the places where he wants to impose development and TALK to LOCAL PEOPLE and PARISH COUNCILLORS loke me. He would learn more in a couple of hours that from countless papers presented by his researchers.

DAVID BROWN, Stonesfield ,Oxon.

DAILY MAIL-SEPTEMBER 20,2017

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 
  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
    •
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BRITAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro

By James Slack Political Editor For The Daily Mail



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

Brexit will let us rediscover role as trading power | Daily Mail Online

Theresa May's Brexit speech puts Cameron to shame | Daily Mail ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Commons and Lords get ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Full reports and analysis

 

A great nation is reborn: Quitting will let us rediscover our role as a ...

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.
 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

  WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

  WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

  WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

  

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

 *		 7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

  WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

  WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW
 
 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 
Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 
 

DAILY MAIL

 

WHY

 DOESN'T

 the

House of  Lords

move

to

BRUSSELS?

RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-

March 3, 2017

Why doesn't the House of Lords move to

BRUSSELS?

 
 

EXTRACT

NOT for the FIRST TIME, it fell to Norman Tebbit to speak for Britain.

Why was it, he asked his fellow members of the Lords, that they were elevating the

RIGHTS OF FOREIGNERS

over those of the

BRITISH PEOPLE.

'It seems to me the

FIRST DUTY of PARLIAMENT

of the

UNITED KINGDOM

is to care for the

INTERESTS OF THE CITIZENS OF THIS KINGDOM'

he  said.

'If we are to be concerned about the rights of anybody after

BREXIT

to live anywhere on this continent of Europe, it should be concern for the

RIGHTS  OF BRITISH PEOPLE

to live freely and peacefully in those other parts of Europe.

WHY

is everybody here today so excited about an amendment which looks after

FOREIGNERS

and

 NOT

THE BRITISH

Fair point. But judging by the reaction in the chamber, you'd have thought Norman had advocated rounding up all foreign nationals living in Britain and deporting them en masse, preferably by gunpoint. His perfectly accurate use of the word

'FOREIGNERS'

had some sensitive Lords and Ladies gasping for their breath and hissing their disapproval at this ghastly racist in their midst.

 Lord Skinhead of Chingford was, of course. merely questioning the demand that before triggering

ARTICLE 50

[ March 15 -2017?]

Theresa May gives a cast iron guarantee that

ALL

EU CITIZENS living in Britain will be allowed to stay after Brexit.

Actually, she's already tried to do that in exchange for a reciprocal assurance that the same will apply to UK citizens living in Europe.

BUT

she was knocked back by

ANGELA MERKEL

who refuses to enter any kind of negotiation until  the Brexit process is under way.

It has become almost compulsory for everyone to agree that those EU nationals who have settled here-keep the

RIGHT TO STAY.

AND it,s true that the majority of EU citizens who have arrived legally over the past few years make a valuable contribution to our economy.

BUT

could the same be said of some of the less desirable elements who have moved to Britain?

The Eastern European beggars and pickpockets littering the streets of our cities for instance, or the assorted criminals we can't deport because of the

EUROPEAN YUMAN RITES RACKET.

The Remoaners don't want to talk about

THEM

naturally.

And frankly, the Lords aren't really bothered about the RIGHTS of EU citizens living in Britain.

It  is merely a convenient device to try to

DISRUPT and IDEALLY PREVENT BRITAIN'S DEPARTURE from THE

[UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-SO-CALLED]

EUROPEAN UNION...

They hold the democratically expressed wishes of more than 17 million voters in contempt and will do everything they can to frustrate the result of the

 REFERENDUM.

Why else would they want to force Mother Theresa to declare her negotiating position in advance?

No one in their right mind shows their cards before bidding in a poker game. Not unless that want to get taken to the cleaners.

No self-respecting union leader or businessman would offer up one-sided concessions before negotiations had ever begun.

What the Remoaners refuse to accept is that Britain holds the winning hand. We buy more from the EU than they buy from us.

The Europeans realise that, which is why they are going to bluff for as long as possible. Can you imagine any politician in Europe behaving like the

REMAIN CAMP in BRITAIN?

Where's the European equivalent of

PROJECT FEAR, warning of the dire consequences of losing access to the lucrative BRITISH MARKET?

Where are the apocalyptic warning from the EUROPEAN BANK that millions of jobs will be lost and the EU will go into FINANCIAL MELTDOWN unless BRUSSELS can strike a favourable DEAL WITH THE UK?

Where are the demands in Britain that Mrs Merkel offers

BRITISH MANUFACTURERS FREE TRADE

for BMW, Mercedes and Audi being allowed to continue to selling

TARIFF-FREE in BRITAIN.

WHERE'S Holland's answer to Anna Soubry touring the TV and radio studios in the Netherlands, complaining tearfully that the Dutch economy is doomed unless they give Britain everything she wants?

Why aren't French hardliners marching down the Champs Elysees, smashing windows and setting fire to police cars, demanding that Paris must agree unconditionally to BRITAIN'S TERMS so they can carry on exporting thie

CHEESES, WINES and MEAT? I don't recall the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT passing a MOTION forcing Jean-Claude Drunker to make any concessions to BRITAIN before the FORMAL BREXIT TALKS START.

And unless I've missed something, how many former

 GERMAN CHANCELLORS-FRENCH PRESIDENTS and ITALIAN PRIME MINISTERS have OPENLY SIDED WITH BRITAIN, in the same way that

 BLAIR and MAJOR

HAVE BACKED EUROPE AGAINST THEIR OWN PEOPLE?

NO,

all we've heard from across the CHANNEL are THREATS to PUNISH US, to CRIPPLE US ECONOMICALLY, to MAKE OUR LIVES HELL ONCE WE ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO LEAVE THE EU.

YET

the overwhelming instinct of our

TRAITOROUS

POLITICAL CLASS

is to bind the hands of our negotiators, to

APPEASE, COMPROMISE and ultimately SURRENDER-with the UNELECTED HOUSE OF LORDS acting as a PRO-BRUSSELS FIFTH COLUMN,

determined to

BETRAY THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE THEY ARE PAID TO REPRESENT..

Are they setting themselves up as

EU's VICHY GOVERNMENT?

MAYBE THEY SHOULD MOVE TO BRUSSELS.

IN wartime, they'd have been put up against a wall and shot

[AND THERE WOULD BE PLENTY OF VOLUNTEERS TO DO JUST THIS TODAY IN MARCH 2017.]

It's a pity Norman Tebbit isn't a few years younger. We could have put him in charge of the Brexit negotiations.

AT LEAST HE'D SPEAK FOR BRITAIN.

*  *  *

 

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

MARCH 3 -2017

H. F.1126 FREEDOM NOW
 
 

A SOFT BREXIT MEANS

 NO

BREXIT

 

 

STEPHEN GLOVER on how a Norway-type solution would mean Britain would have to accept EU laws without having any influence over them 

 

[ A  MOST TRAITOROUS EUROPHILE-WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN SACKED LONG-LONG AGO.]

[ A DESTROYER OF A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE]

13/06/17 23:35

Since the election a myth has sprouted, seemingly shared by Philip Hammond, that voters were against a 'hard' Brexit - despite Labour and the Tories vowing to leave the single market. ...read

 

A soft Brexit means no Brexit:

The truth is that the term ‘soft Brexit’ is endlessly and lazily repeated without it ever being properly examined. As soon as it is, it disintegrates into dust. Theresa May should call the bluff of these myopic Tory Remainers.

Don’t they realise their antics give comfort to Michel Barnier and Jean-Claude Juncker in Brussels? Mrs May has been weakened by losing her overall majority. Barnier even had the gall yesterday to tell the British Government to hurry up. How overjoyed the Eurocrats will be if they see her under attack by her own party.

And then what? A Tory split can only have one outcome — which is Jeremy Corbyn and his hard-Left clique ruling this country. We came far too close for comfort last week. It wouldn’t take much to put this unsavoury extremist in No 10.

A soft Brexit is no Brexit.

 It’s not an option for this country. It certainly isn’t worth splitting the Tory Party by fighting over it, and giving cheer to EU negotiators in Brussels.

And despite what Mr Hammond and others may claim, despite all the disappointments of last Thursday, there isn’t a shred of evidence that the British people have changed their minds about wanting

 BREXIT.


 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4601626/A-soft-Brexit-means-no-Brexit-STEPHEN-GLOVER.html#ixzz4kH5M4a1d
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

[A reminder to Philip Hammond]

INDEPENDENCE

'The word independence is united to ideas of dignity and virtue; the word dependence, to ideas of inferiority and corruption.'

J.BENTHAM (1748-1832) -Eng.philosopher.

[The main attraction for a politician is the power and profit within the bureaucracy of the EU-:Mandleson-Kinnock and Family and many-many others.]

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JUNE 13-2017

H.F.1227-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 

Searches related to eu latest news on brexit

brexit what is it

brexit news today

brexit news immigration

brexit eu citizens

brexit news live

brexit latest poll

brexit news latest

grexit and brexit

KEEP UP TO DATE WITH THE LATEST NEWS

ON ENGLAND LEAVING HITLER'S 194O's PLAN

 FOR GERMAN DOMINATION IN THE PEACE.

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/  ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/ ****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

AS WE ALL NOW KNOW DAVID CAMERON ONLY CALLED FOR A REFERENDUM ON JUNE 23-2016 ON THE EU BECAUSE HE WAS SO CONFIDENT THAT' HE HAD IT IN THE BAG'.

[JUST A FEW OF THE OVER 1000 BULLETINS ON OUR WEBSITE OVER 14 YEARS OF THE

COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-UNACCOUNTABLE-UNDEMOCRATIC-WASTEFUL-EXPENSIVE-DESTROYER OF FREEDOM AND SERVANT OF BABEL.]

[MUCH OF OUR WORK REVEALING THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU SINCE 2005 HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A NUMBER OF PATRIOTS  SUCH AS THE

TRUE PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

CHRISTOPHER+STORY

ON THE

THE+EUROPEAN+UNION+COLLECTIVE-ENEMY+OF+ITS+MEMBER+STATES+BY+PATRIOT-CHRISTOPHER+STORY

*

JUNE 19-2017

THE LINKS BELOW  ARE TO OTHER

TRUTHSEEKERS AND PATRIOTS

H.F1228-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

EU QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

There are over 1000 Bulletins on the EU in our

BULLETIN FILE and EU FILE

 CLICK FOR TOP TOPICS

JUNE -2009

1]  EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU ?

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10]    VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]    100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT1          100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT2

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007] -NOT MUCH LUCK HERE!

33]    ALMOST 50% OF EU BUDGET SPENT ON CAP FATCATS

34] SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU

35] WHY BRITISH BUSINESS IS TURNING AGAINST THE EU

36] BRITISH CONSTITUTION-IDENTITY AND VALUES

37] MODERN DILEMA IN POLITICS-TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM.

38] LETTER FROM LORD KILMUIR TO TED HEATH WITH TRUE FACTS OF EU

39] INTERVIEW WITH RUSSIAN DISSIDENT WHO WARNED OF EU DICTATORSHIP

40]   The Truth About A Federal Europe - Part I

41]   Cost of EU to UK - £4,811 million in 2003= 40 District Hospitals equipped and staffed and funded.

42]  CAN THE 1972 ACCESSION TREATY TO THE EU BE REPEALED?

43]  Neil Kinnock in glover - but failed to stop the Shadow of graft over EU’s £68bn spending.

44]  Now the EU wants a single Foreign Office to replace Nation-States Embassies.

45]   How the EU takes over Nation-States.

46]  A Fabian Europhile of 1947 supported Independent Nation-States and the Rule of Law

47]       The New European Constitution - Part 1

48]  12-Point Summary of EU Constitution continued - Part 2

49]  The New European Constitution - Part 1

50]  An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.

51]   Britain takes over as biggest contributor to the EU Budget

52]  Neil Kinnock sacked honest Auditor because of refusal to sign off questionable EU Accounts.

53]  General De Gaulle acclaims British national institutions back in 1960.

54]  Brussels scams can let an MEP fiddle £60,000 a year.

55]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 1

56]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 2

57]  Europe and a conspiracy of Silence.

58]  Ninety-nine countries will soon have Free Trade with EU -without paying a cent to Brussels.

59]   Britain must leave the EU as UN show best area for expansion will be USA-Anglo.Saxon sphere.

60]  82 million Germans have no say as MP’s back EU Constitution.

61]  The EU big brother policy reaches back over two millennium.

62]   Europe: It’s the modern version of the white man’s burden.

63]   E U COUNCIL OF MINISTERS.

64]  EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.

65] German - Nazi - Geopolitical Centre established in Madrid in 1943 by Heinrich Himmler.

66]  What were the Dark Actors Playing Games, which the patriot Dr David Kelly referred?

67]  DEMOCRACY IS A DIALECTICAL FARCE BECAUSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES CALL THE SHOTS NOT SO-CALLED DEMOCRACIES.

68]  Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

69]  EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE.

70]  NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

71]   WHY NO TREATY LIMITING EU POWERS

72]   THE E.U.’S VERY OWN AESOPIAN LANGUAGE.

73]    WHAT IF ENGLAND HADN'T JOINED THE EU

74]   67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM EU

75]   WILL IRELAND SAVE EUROPE FROM ITSELF?

76]   WHY EU REGIONAL POLICY WILL DESTROY THE NATION STATE

77]   EMPIRES HAVE GONE AND MOST PEOPLE LIVE IN NATION STATES.

78 THE FINAL BETRAYAL- WHICH TOOK PLACE IN 2008 

79]  WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR-NOW BROWN-SHE DIDN'T - BUT SOLD US TO THE EU80] 

80]  Almost everything ,which is precious in our civilisation, has come from small States

81]  THE EU BIG BROTHER POLICY REACHES BACK OVER TWO MILLENNIUM

82]   THE EURO A DOOMED CURRENCY

83]  GERMANY AS STRONG MAN OF EUROPE

84]  BRITAIN AND EUROPE-THE CULTURE OF DECEIT

85]  NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

86]  A BETTER WAY FORWARD TOGETHER IN EUROPE-OUT OF THE EUROPEAN UNIOn

87]   A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

88]   TO CONTROL OUR COURTS AND BORDERS IS THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL EUROSCEPTIC STRATEGY.
89] BLACK OPERATIONS AND TRICKERY BIND UK TO EU
90]  HITLER-HAUSHOFER AND GEORGE KENNON-PENTAGON PLANS IDENTICAL
91]  Oh Boyo - Family on Brussels gravy train cost TAXPAYER £34 million and RISING!
92]   NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

93]    WHY DID THEY WANT BRITAIN IN EUROPE -  IN 1963
94]   Lies and The Betrayal of Britain
95]    Be Warned - The lies of 1975 still haunt us
96]   THe Strange Case of the Werner Report
97]   1972 EU Communities Act
98]   Further 200 Reasons why to Reject the Euro and E
99]  New elite threatens EU project admits Lib-Dem Peer
100]     The secretive Bilderberger Group will destroy True Democracy
101] BBC EUROPHILE BIAS-UPDATE-by LORD PEARSON

102]   How ‘a good European’ turned into a eurosceptic whistle-blower

103]   HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007
104]    IF Gordon Brown forces this EU TREATY on us, you can kiss goodbye to DEMOCRACY  -HE DID!
105]   FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ARE THE FUTURE OF WORLD TRADE
106]   Twelve Mighty Reasons why you must say 'No' to the EU

107]        How much does it cost the UK in the EU
108]   THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL
109]   IF MONETARY UNION GOES-EUROPEAN PROJECT IS UNDERMINED
 
 
 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE-2009

H. F .11 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 

 
 A MATTER OF CONCERN!

 

LOOK AROUND YOU IN SEPTEMBER 2017-ARE NOT THE SIGNS OF THE SUBVERSIVE DESTRUCTION OF OUR SOCIETY BY SUCCESSIVE POLITICALLY-CORRECT GOVERNMENTS ON MATTERS THAT CONCERN THE INDIVIDUAL AND ARE NO BUSINESS OF THE STATE-WE NOW HAVE THE NATIONAL TRUST PARTICIPATING IN PRIVATE MATTERS OF NO CONCERN OF THEIRS BY INVADING THE MINDS OF THEIR VOLUNTARY STAFF.

GREATER TOLERANCE IS ONE THING -BUT THE CONTINUAL HARASSMENT OF THOSE HOLDING ALTERNATE VIEWS IS AKIN TO A SALEM WITCH-HUNT.

WHEREAS IN THE PAST, IT WAS A MATTER OF

'LIVE and LET-LIVE'

, NOW THERE IS A CONSTANT MISSION OF INTRUSION INTO THE MIND OF THE INDIVIDUAL TO THE POINT WHERE IT IS NOW THE STATE AND NOT THE INDIVIDUAL WHO CONTROLS THEIR INNERMOST THOUGHTS AND ACTIONS BECAUSE THE STATE HAS TRANSGRESSED THOSE MATTERS WHICH SHOULD ONLY CONCERN THE INDIVIDUAL. WE NOW SEE EVERY HUMAN DIFFERENCE LAID BARE WITH LITTLE MYSTERY WHICH ONCE MADE EACH INDIVIDUAL A PERSON OF THEIR OWN MAKING. WE ASK, WHERE WILL IT STOP? WE CAN ALREADY SEE THAT THIS MANIA IS INFECTING MUCH OF OUR SOCIETY AND NOW IN SEPTEMBER '2017 ONE OF OUR PREMIER  NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SUCH AS THE NATIONAL TRUST.

News for DAILY MAIL- MUTINY AT THE NATIONAL TRUST

 

*  *  *

NATIONAL DE- STABILISATION PLAN OF KGB/GRU BASED ON SOVIET DEFECTOR INTELLIGENCE

[THE ENEMY WITHIN]
'DEPARTMENTS' OR 'AREAS'

OF

THE TARGETED SOCIETY

 METHODS

EMPLOYED

 INTENDED RESULTS
'IDEAS' [sic] DEMORALISATION INTENDED RESULTS

1] Religion

2] Education

3] Media

4] Culture

 

 Politicisation, commercialisation, scurrilous 'happy-clappy' events, entertainment. In the case of true Christianity. ignorance of scripture. Empty ritual. Women priests. racism. permissiveness, relativity. Monopolisation of 'news' and comment. Manipulation of information and thought. Constant criticism and discrediting of institutions. Concentration on fake, non issues, double-standards .Substitution of false, cheap heroes and role models for inspiration and morals.

 

 Diversionary claptrap, simony, false religion, sects, divination, magic, sorcery, charismania, death wish, spiritual desert, emptiness and ignorance.

Ignorance, zero historical knowledge, 'Political correctness'

'Groupthink'

Luciferian fog.

Uninformed myopia, opinions = facts. reiteration of lies as facts, which are accepted as such by the uninformed.

Emergence of the 'common mind'

 
STRUCTURE    

5] Law and Order

6] Social relations

7] Security

 

8] Internal politics

 

9] Foreign relations.

 Legislated, imposed, inconsistent, unwarranted bias in favour of offender, victimisation of victim. Rights not obligations

Penetration and demoralisation of intelligence community, police, military [homosexuality etc.] Women in military. Collectivisation of military power and security. Aggressive, poisonous party antagonisms, sense of drift, failure to get to grips with issues, constant lying and equivocation, careerism and egoism. Entanglement in ever-expanding net of multilateral treaties, accords and  bilateral treaties underpinning them. Diplomats identify with foreign states rather than their own

 Mistrust of 'justice', legal cynicism in EU context, 'justice' is whatever promotes the EU's interests. Erosion of individual responsibility. Degradation of intelligence quality. Defencelessness. Total unawareness of strategy. ideology of 'cooperation'. In   ability to act decisively and alone. Infrastructure decay.

National disunity, cynicism, posturing by top leadership, lack of purpose. Government by 'spin doctorate'. Substance subordinated to image. Enveloping sense of oppressive impotence on world stage. Double-standards (e.g. IRA TERRORISTS =FREEDOM FIGHTERS', not 'INTERNATIONAL TERRORISTS']. Confusion at the top, wrong priorities.

'LIFE'

    

10] Family, society

11] Health

12] Race

13] Population

14] Labour

 Foster breakdown, destroy marriage. Junk food, drugs, state provided conditional health care, mass sports. Mixing of races, elevation of 'racism' to Hitlerian level, promotion of 'diversity', degradation of breeding, 'genetics vs. environment' debate. Alienation from countryside, urbanisation, drug addiction, vulnerability to mass epidemics.

Trade unions vs society. public service chaos.

 Destroy loyalty, leaving state to claim it.

Alcohol, drug abuse, obesity, impotence Enfeebled masses.

 

hatred, divisions, evil compromises.

General alienation, victimisation, sense of impending breakdown, demoralisation.

 

 

 
TRIUMPH OF SUBVERSION DESTABILISATION STAGE [2-5 years*]  

15] Power struggle

16] Economy

 

17] Society , law.

 

18 position in the world

 Populism, irresponsible power struggle. Destruction of legal substructure, bargaining process, industry, currency, red tape, excessive taxation, arbitrary abuse of power by bureaucrats. grass roots participation in everything., maximisation of indignation, exposures. destroyed, as nation is subsumed in multi-nation mechanisms, all influence lost. Big Brother appears in the wings. In the EU. context. Big Brother in the Collective - The beast' which has 'emerged' and is not yet recognised as such, as the oppressor. Big Brother gains credibility, power. Reaction.  Mobocracy, breakdown of law and order, rioting, street deaths. Psychological collapse, destruction of all past values and self-esteem, encirclement.
REVOLUTION CRISIS [2-6months*] CENTRAL REVOLUTIONARY COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED
*Soviet sources indicate these timeframes were/are in dispute

'NORMALISATION' [=de facto Communism] and 'PEACE' [=effective cessation of all opposition to Socialism/Communism]. Option of bloodbath ['perestrelka']S
The national revolutionary subversion process, based on details revealed by the Soviet defector Yurly Bezmenov (a.k.a. Tomes Schuman) using his own knowledge of KGB strategy and details conveyed to John Barron, [the author of 'KGB: the Secret Work of Soviet Secret Agents' [1974] and 'KGB Today: the Hidden hand' [1983], Hodder and Stoughton, London, by the GRU-KGB officer Stanislav Levchenko, who had attended the Soviet Academy of [Leninist ]Sciences' oriental Studies Institute with Bezmenov.  The chart, which  has been elaborated by this Author on the basis of new information, shows the four stages of Soviet/Leninist ideology subversion: DEMORALISATION, DESTABILISATION, CRISIS and NORMALISATION'. Source: 'SOVIET ANALYST'

*

'The Perestroika Deception': The World's Slide towards The 'Second October Revolution by Anatoliy Golitsyn, the famous genuine Soviet defector.

www.worldreports.org

c/story@worldreports.org

 

NOVEMBER-2008

HOME

RON PAUL 9-11+(1) GLOBAL

WARMING SCAM

FLU PANDEMIC SCAM

 USA IRAQ/AFGHAN LONDON

BOMBINGS

 COMMON PURPOSE CENTRAL BANKS  +(1)+(1)
HOME ARCHIVE  MAIN

 BULLETINS

IMMIGRATION

  CON

 E U  ENGLAND +(1) BILDERBERGERS+(1) ILLUMINATI +(1)

+(1)+(1)

 NEW WORLD ORDER +(1)+(1)

 

How and Why Was WWI Planned and Prolonged

Mujahid Kamran

August 1, 2017

The history of the First World War is a deliberately concocted lie. Not the sacrifice, the heroism, the horrendous waste of life or the misery that followed. No, these were very real but the truth of how it all began and how it was unnecessarily and deliberately prolonged beyond 1915 has been successfully covered up for a century. A carefully falsified history was created to conceal the fact that Britain, not Germany, was responsible for the war. Had the truth become known after 1918, the consequences for the British Establishment would have been cataclysmic.”

Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor

The Planners and the Plan

The First World War did not just happen. There is undeniable evidence that the war was planned by the international-banker controlled British oligarchy almost two decades before it broke out (see e.g. [1-3]). In their outstanding book Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor have established beyond reasonable doubt that indeed the First World War was planned by a tiny group of members of the British oligarchy including Nathaniel Rothschild [1].

King Edward VII

While building upon what was first revealed by the late Professor Carrol Quigley, they have not only provided detailed evidence in favor of this thesis, but have also revealed the astonishing role of the British monarch, King Edward VII, in secretly building alliances against Germany. They have provided ample evidence that the playboy King, much disliked by his mother Queen Victoria, went along with the secret group that had, in the first place, planned this horrific war.

The secret group of people, whose existence was first revealed by Professor Carrol Quigley, thus putting his own life in danger, decided to work behind the scenes with the utmost secrecy. The revelations of Professor Quigley were based on documents provided by the Secret Elite, as they are referred to sometimes. The documents were provided for the purpose of writing a sanitized history.

The goal of the Secret Elite was the expansion of the British empire to the total exclusion of other powers.

This cabal was extremely wealthy. Cecil Rhodes, who, with Rothschild help, had amassed a huge fortune in South Africa, first discussed his plans with Nathaniel Rothschild in February 1890 in the presence of a few members of the British oligarchy.

In 1891 a five-member secret group comprising Cecil Rhodes, Nathaniel Rothschild, William Stead, Lord Esher and Alfred Milner became, unknown to anyone else, the core group that decided to steer the world towards a war aimed at the destruction of Germany. They called themselves the Society of the Elect. Around themselves they built, as if in a concentric circle, The Association of Helpers, eminent men, who did not know of the Society of the Elect. Other men were gradually involved in the plan but they were not aware of the separate existence of the five-member core. Together, these men steered and controlled the course of British foreign policy, unknown to the Parliament, the people, the Cabinet, and others who were constitutionally relevant.

These men represented a new phenomenon on the world stage – the money kings, who held no office and yet had real power to decide the fate of nations. When Rhodes died at age 48, he left all his money to these men for the sole purpose of extending the British empire over the entire globe. Secrecy was of utmost importance to this group.

The destruction of Germany, the Secret Elite knew, would entail enormous bloodshed. They also knew that Britain could not do it alone. It needed the strength of the Russian and French armies to achieve that end.

Russian soldiers WW1

And maybe the Secret Elite wanted Russia and France to shed their own and German blood for them. But France had been a traditional enemy of the British and vice versa whereas Russia and Britain had vied for the control of the Black Sea and the annexation of Constantinople i.e. Istanbul. There was rivalry between Russia and Britain regarding the Russian urge southwards and eastwards to warm waters, seaports that could function round the year. In the south lay the “jewel” of the British empire – India.

Despite these rivalries the Secret Elite was determined to befriend and woo both France and Russia because it considered Germany the most potent threat to the existence of the British empire. Germany was not fully aware of this heinous plan aimed at its utter destruction. And Russia and France, both were trapped by the Secret Elite. In fact, the Secret Elite succeeded not only in destroying Germany, they also destroyed Russia, and by prolonging the war, destroyed the Ottoman as well as the Austro-Hungarian empires. Britain, in the end, did not really benefit. The Zionists did – the Illuminati Zionist bankers emerged as the real force on the world stage. The Milners and the Eshers and Balfours, and all others became powerless eventually and faded away.

The Rothschilds have continued into the 21st century enhancing their power and wealth with every major bloodshed. They and their illuminati banking brethren were the real beneficiaries. The Christian West was the real loser. And so were the Muslims.

It is well known among historians that Queen Victoria disapproved of her son’s womanizing and kept his royal stipend at a minimum while she was in power. The expenses of the womanizing of King Edward VII, when he was a playboy Prince of Wales, were borne by the Rothschilds and by Sir Ernest Cassel, both bankers of German-Jewish extraction. When he came to power Edward VII was keen to oblige his patrons who, apparently, wanted to destroy the emerging German nation. And, in any case he was under the impression that the destruction of Germany would pave the way for a global British Empire – it was to be his empire.

The Zionist/Illuminati international bankers had other plans. King Edward VII was the architect of the Entente Cordiale of 1904. His image as a playboy concealed the fact that he was traveling all over Europe to build alliances against Germany, while Germany never suspected that traditional enemies like England and France could or would become friends.

Docherty and Macgregor also describe the infiltration of the Foreign Office and the Colonial Office of Great Britain by agents of the group that had planned the First World War. They were able to control the officers of both government departments. They also controlled the War Office as well as the highly important and secret Committee of Imperial Defense. The Group had influence in both parties. Their policy of destroying Germany not only transcended party politics, it also went beyond which party was in power – it transcended governments.

The Parliaments and the prime ministers came and went without knowing that a tiny cabal was planning and relentlessly driving Britain to total war with Germany.

*

Cover up and Fabricated History

Docherty and Macgregor have further revealed that (p 5, ref. [1]):

The Secret Elite dictated the writing and teaching of history, from the ivory towers of the academia down to the smallest of schools. They carefully controlled the publication of official government papers, the selection of documents for inclusion in the official version of the history of the First World War, and refused access to any evidence that might betray their covert existence. Incriminating documents were burned, removed from official records, shredded, falsified, or deliberately rewritten, so that what remained for historians was carefully selected material.”

Docherty and Macgregor point out (their book was published in 2013) that even “To this day researchers are denied access to certain First World War documents because the Secret Elite had much to fear from the truth, as do those who have succeeded them.” Why such a vehement cover up that even a century later the British authorities do not grant access to certain documents pertaining to the first World War? They want to maintain the myth of German culpability and their innocence, whereas the reality is the reverse of what establishment history portrays. The truth will shift the onus of responsibility to the shoulders of the Secret Elite and of every other consequence that followed: the Second World War, Bank of International Settlements, IMF, World Bank, the U.N., Israel, the Korean and Vietnam wars, continuing wars in the Middle East, right up to the dangerous situation today. They have lied to generations and rather than let the truth be known they have chosen and attempted to perpetuate the lie worldwide and for all times.

They can do so because the international illuminati-Zionist bankers are all powerful and control the American and British governments. Israel is a Rothschild fiefdom, a source of perpetual war and a possible eventual Armageddon. The academia is, by and large, part of this cover up and that is very sad, to say the least. Any historian in a university who challenges the establishment version will be ostracized, if not thrown out of his job. Nick Kollerstrom had to lose his job despite the fact that he is an outstanding academic. One of his colleagues, whom he had known for years, was so angry that he told Kollerstrom that he wanted to hit him with his racket!

Guido Preparata was ostracized for his outstanding book Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Built the Third Reich, and had to quit his job, leave the U.S., and even give up his research career for some time. It is therefore significant that Docherty and Macgregor, though British (both are Scottish) do not work for any British university. They, therefore, cannot be thrown out of their jobs.

On the surface of it, the strategic aim behind the instigated and covertly planned World War I was to destroy both Germany and Russia and thereby kill the possibility of emergence of a dominant Eurasian power, or a powerful coalition of Eurasian countries, that could threaten the British Empire. The initial group, the Circle of the Elect, appeared to have, as its aim, the establishment of a worldwide British Empire. It only included one banker, Nathaniel Rothschild. With hindsight, the evolution of global affairs indicates without any doubt that the Zionists (Communism and Zionism sprouted from the same Illuminati “tribe” and had a common origin) were the real beneficiaries and the deeper instigators of this war.

The world today is headed towards a global slave state controlled by the Illuminati cum Zionist international bankers. The Bolshevik Revolution was led and controlled by “atheistic Jews” (to use Churchill’s phrase) most of whom came from outside Russia and both Lloyd David George and President Wilson were stooges of the Zionists. Today both, the U.S. and the U.K., are completely controlled by the Zionist cum Illuminati international bankers.

However, other deeper aims of the international bankers were to weaken Christianity through widespread death and destruction of Christian life and property, to weaken European governments by exhaustively bleeding them and bringing them under deep debt bondage, to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution, to facilitate the creation of Israel and the establishment of a supra-national organization through which to set up a One World Government under their ruthless and absolute control (The New World Order). The international bankers were simultaneously Zionists and Freemasons/Illuminati.

A photo of the 1914 Christmas Truce illustrates how the British and Germans had no antipathy until it was created by propaganda and the war itself

*

Building Japan, Bruising and then Wooing Russia after Sabotaging a Russo German Treaty

It was the Secret Elite that was behind the strategy to build Japan’s navy that was then used to destroy the Russian fleet that traveled around the world to confront the Japanese navy. The Russian fleet was utterly destroyed in the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905 and the small island nation managed to inflict a humiliating defeat on a giant. This was part of the strategy of the Secret Elite to curtail Russia’s ambitions in the Far East and to bruise and weaken her. Ships for the Japanese navy were quietly built in the shipyards of Britain. On the one hand, the Rothschilds in London secretly provided loans to Japan, while on the other the Rothschilds in France provided loans worth 400 million francs to the Russian government to build the 6365 miles long trans-Siberian railway (p 86, ref. [1]). The Russians had expressed their gratitude to the Rothschilds when the czar decorated Alfonso de Rothschild of Paris with Grand Cross. The London Rothschilds made double profits because the armament industry which manufactured battleships for the Japanese navy were partly owned by the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds had the greatest shares in Vickers armament. Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 92, 93 ref [1]):

Manipulators at the heart of the Secret Elite, like Esher, facilitated meetings held on Rothschild premises to help the Japanese financial envoy, Takahashi Korekiyo, raise their war chest. While banks with strong links to the Rothschilds were prepared to raise funds for Japan quite openly, the Rothschilds had to tread carefully because of their immense Russian investments, not least in the Baku oilfields. They were also very aware of the political repercussions that might ensue for Russian Jews who bore the harsh brunt of czarist anti-Semitism. That changed once the war was over. The London and Paris Rothschilds negotiated a further £48 million issue to help Japanese recovery. At every turn the war profits flowed back to the Secret Elite.”

It was Japan that attacked the Russian fleet in Port Arthur, a Chinese port that was functional all year round and had been leased to Russia. Although Japan issued a declaration of war on Feb 8, 1904, its navy attacked the Russian fleet three hours before the ultimatum was delivered to the Russian government.

In order to go to war with Germany the Secret Elite took four decisions. These are summarized by Docherty and Macgregor in the following words (pp 73,74, ref. [1]):

“Foreign policy had to be sustained no matter what political party was in office; the British Army needed a complete overhaul to make it fit for the purpose; the Royal Navy had to maintain all its historic advantages; the general public had to be turned against Germany.”

The British public did not want to go to war with Germany and therefore a secretly driven but powerful propaganda campaign against Germany was launched in order to poison the minds of the public. The Belgian ambassador apparently noticed by 1903 that jingoism was on the rise in Britain and people were turning against Germany. He wrote to his government that this was merely because of jealousy. Docherty and Macgregor point out that the ambassador did not know that secret manipulation behind the scenes had resulted in this attitude.

The Secret Elite worked relentlessly using the vast Rhodes fortune at its disposal to buy politicians and men of influence in all countries that were relevant. One of the men in their pocket was Alexander Islovsky, who served them loyally to the immense detriment of Russia, Europe and the Christian West. Kaiser Wilhelm had made a brilliant move in 1905 – he wanted to have an agreement between Russia and Germany that would have averted the war by forming a defensive alliance.

The Kaiser and the Czar secretly met and signed an agreement on July 24, 1905 at Bjorko Finland, whereby if any one of the countries was attacked by a European power the other shall come to its aid. However, when the czar returned to Russia the agents of the Secret Elite as well as a bribed press opposed the ratification of the treaty. Actually no one knew of the contents of the treaty until the Czar confided in is his foreign minister Count Lansdorff who betrayed the secret to King Edward VII.

The Czar was in need of money after the Russo-Japanese war in which Russia suffered heavy material and human losses. He therefore needed loans and the Rothschilds in Paris were far richer than any Berlin banks. The Secret Elite threatened to block the much needed loans. This was crucial and the Czar backed off despite having signed the proposed treaty. This treaty, had it gone through, would have averted the planned world war. This caused the Kaiser immense pain and he wrote to the Czar (p 95 ref. [1]): “We joined hands and signed before God who heard our vows.” This mistake by the Czar was to cost Russia and Germany dearly during World War I.

Having sabotaged the Russo-German alliance the Secret Elite then used King Edward VII to woo Russia. The King invited the Russian navy to Britain and the British public was softened towards Russia through a media campaign. The Secret Elite managed to lure and trap Russia by a false promise of allowing Russia to control Constantinople (Istanbul) and the Black Sea Straits. A Russia that had been mauled militarily, that was in dire financial straits, and that was presented with a dangling Constantinople carrot succumbed and fell in the trap. An Anglo-Russian Convention was signed on 31 August 1907. Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 95,96 ref. [1]):

The Secret Elite was prepared to use any nation as cat’s-paw and Russia became the victim of British trickery, manipulated into a different treaty that was designed not to protect her or the peace of Europe but to enable the Secret Elite to destroy Germany. . . It was yet another secret deal hidden from Parliament and the people. . .”

By such deceptions, lies, bribery and manipulations, the brutal and absolutely ruthless and utterly shameless Secret Elite proceeded to steer and goad nations to a path of unprecedented bloodshed in which Christian, and to a lesser extent Muslim blood was shed. The beneficiaries were the satanic illuminati international bankers and their brethren. Their determination to destroy Germany masked a deep and malevolent desire for a conflagration that would burn Christian Europe to ashes with tens of millions of casualties. That was their goal and they drew the deepest delight and satisfaction by turning men into savage animals.

The Myth of Belgian Neutrality

When World War I began the British public had been exposed to false propaganda for a long time. Two issues on which their mind had been falsely influenced were Belgian neutrality and German militarism. Facts were the opposite of what people were led to believe. As for Belgian neutrality, it was utterly untrue. Belgium was not only not neutral it had had close military links with Britain since 1905 when Britain offered to send “4 cavalry brigades, 2 armored corps, and a division of mounted infantry” to Belgium (p 106, ref. [1]). At that time nobody outside the close knit Secret Elite know of, or suspected, possible war with Germany.

Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 106, 107ref. [1]): “Britain’s military link with Belgium was one of the closes guarded secrets, even within privileged circles.” General Grierson, who was director of military operations was present at a secret 1905 meeting along with Lord Roberts, PM Balfour, Admiral Fisher and the head of naval intelligence, where a decision to take forward joint military planning with France and Belgium was taken. This was so secret that it was agreed that “the minutes would not be printed or circulated without special permission from the prime minister.” Docherty and MacGregor write further (p 107, ref. [1]):

Documents found in the Belgian secret archives by the Germans after they had occupied Brussels disclosed that the chief of the Belgian general staff, Major General Ducarne, held a series of meetings with the British military attache’ over action to be taken by British, French and Belgian armies against Germany in event of war. A fully elaborated plan detailed the landing and transportation of British forces, which were actually called ‘allied armies’, and in a series of meetings they discussed the allocation of Belgian officers and interpreters to the British Army and crucial details on the care and ‘accommodation of the wounded of the allied armies.’”

The British allowed Belgium to annex Congo Free State in return for a “secret agreement that was in everything but name an alliance. King Leopold II sold Belgian neutrality for African rubber and minerals.” Thus Belgium bargained away her neutral status and in return entered into a deep and hidden relationship with Britain against Germany. Docherty and Macgregor point out that here too King Edward VII played a hidden but important role because the King of Belgium was a cousin of Queen Victoria and was very fond of her. So much for Belgian neutrality that became a rallying cry to war for the misled and deliberately misinformed British public. The technique of using the media to control the public mindset continues to date and entails an incredible cost in terms of loss of human life and property.

The Myth of German Militarism

As for German militarism, Docherty and Macgregor have provided irrefutable data that clearly establishes that Britain was spending far more secretly on arming itself compared to Germany. In reality it was British militarism but the cunning and, in a sense, deep characterlessness of the Secret Elite, which hoodwinked everyone and which worked outside and in contradiction with the constitution, and which lied to and shamelessly deceived everyone, created the opposite impression. When the Liberal leader Campbell-Bannerman won a landslide victory in 1906, the Liberals were committed to peace.

Edward Grey and Haldane were committed to war and along with other members of the Secret Elite, steering the country towards war. Cabinet was never informed of this, nor was the prime minister. The crafted biographies of men like Haldane contain lies and are unreliable. And if one reads Docherty and Macgregor they have exposed the lies in Haldane’s biography and private notes. In fact, there is evidence that Campbell-Bannerman was kept in the dark about the military contacts with other countries. His untimely death in 1908 relieved the Secret Elite of the pressure for a peaceful world! In fact, the Secret Elite were very worried soon afterwards, because in 1910, their key patron King Edward VII died at age 68, while the Liberals were still in power.

False propaganda about German military preparations was carried out at the behest of the Secret Elite in the British media. As Docherty and Macgregor put it (pp 134, 135, ref. [1])

From the beginning of the twentieth century, the Secret Elite indulged in a frenzy of rumor and half-truths, of raw propaganda and lies, to create the myth of a great naval race. The story widely accepted, even by many anti-war Liberals, was that Germany was preparing a massive fleet of warships to attack and destroy the British navy before unleashing a military invasion on the east coast of England or the Firth of Forth in Scotland. It was the stuff of conspiracy novels. But it worked. The British people swallowed the lie that militarism had run amok in Germany and the ‘fact’ that it was seeking world domination through military superiority. Militarism in the United Kingdom was of God, but in Germany of the Devil, and had to be crushed before it crushed them.”

These authors are quick to point out that when Germany was defeated and all their prewar records became available to the Allies, not a shred of evidence in favor of such secret plans to invade Britain were discovered. They point out that the statistics were thoroughly abused by an “almighty alliance of armaments manufacturers, political rhetoric, and newspaper propaganda” that conjured a frightening image of a German naval armada and the German will to dominate the world.

Rothschild and Ernest Cassel, who paid for the lechery of King Edward VII when he was a playboy Prince of Wales, were major owners of the largest armament factory Vickers. They point out that in the decade prior to war the British naval expenditure was £351.9 million whereas the German naval expenditure was £185.2 million, i.e. almost half of the British expenditure. Similarly, the Allies, i.e., the Triple Entente spent £675.88 million on warships in that same decade whereas Germany and Austro-Hungary spent £235.9 million, almost a third of what the Entente had spent, on their navies in the same period.

Generals Hindenburg and Ludendorff (R) lead Germany as virtual military dictators from mid-1916 to the end of the war

The German army was 7,61000 strong, the French and Russian armies had, respectively, 794,000 and 1.845 million personnel. So, where is the evidence of German militarism running amok? Who was running amok? Who was spending far more than the Germans? This lie of German military buildup has been perpetuated by establishment historians when the numbers speak out for themselves. The establishment historians should be ashamed at propagating lies and holding the so-called nonexistent German militarism responsible for the war. They have lied to, and continue to lie to their own people as well as the whole world. What a shame! The Germans should stand up with their heads high. They did not lie or deceive.

The sanitized history taught worldwide seems to hold Germany as the aggressor. This is utterly untrue as established by Docherty and Macgregor. Preparata also states in his fascinating book (published 2005) (p 14 of ref [3]):

“From the beginning Britain was the aggressor, not Germany.”

The Russian ambassador to France Isvolsky, who was an agent of the Secret Elite, sent a telegram to Moscow on August 1, 1914 (p 320, ref. [1]):

“The French War Minister informed me, in hearty high spirits, that the Government have firmly decided on war, and begged me to endorse the hope of the French General Staff that all efforts will be directed against Germany…”

Germany did not order mobilization until 24 hours later! The Kaiser had sent a message to the Russian czar asking that Russia stop her military movements on her borders. The Kaiser waited for 24 hours without any reply before ordering mobilization. Docherty and Macgregor correctly observe that Germany was the last of the European powers to order mobilization. Does that indicate that Germany wanted war? It only indicates that Germany did her best to avoid war.

A detailed study of the interactions between the British leaders and the Germans and others during July and the first days of August reveals clearly that the British leaders were shamelessly lying to the Germans and deceiving them. Their conduct had descended to the level of common criminals and crooks.

The Germans conducted themselves with integrity and a degree of innocence. The Secret Elite had also advised the Russians and the French to mobilize to attack, but not actually attack Germany, because the British public would never support the aggressor in a European war. They wanted Germany, as Docherty and Macgregor put it, to “swallow the bait.” Britain had trapped Germany into a war, in collusion with Russia and France. Docherty and Macgregor write (p 321, ref. [1]):

“What else could Germany have done? She was provoked into a struggle for life and death. It was a stark choice: await certain destruction or strike out to defend herself. Kaiser Wilhelm had exposed his country to grave danger and almost lost one precious advantage Germany had by delaying countermeasures to Russian mobilization in the forlorn hope of peace.”

When Germany declared war against France on August 3, 1914, the French Under-Secretary of State, Abel Ferry, noted in his diary (ref. [3], p 24):

The web was spun and Germany entered it like a great buzzing fly.”

The Illuminati international bankers and other secret society members of the British oligarchy had colluded together for a destruction of Christian Europe. Only the Zionist international bankers and their fellow “tribesmen” saw this outcome clearly – they had planned for it and the non-banking oligarchy was used. The lie parroted in standard history books that Germany bore the responsibility of the war is an utter and shameful lie. The responsibility of the war rested with the Secret Elite controlled British leadership.

Western Front WW1 British soldier

Zionism and the American Involvement

Almost two months before war broke out, on May 29, 1914, the Rothschild agent Col. House, who handled and controlled President Wilson, had written to him:

“Whenever England consents, France and Russia will close in on Germany.”

It is well known that Col. Edward Mandel House was a Rothschild agent as was his father. Col. House played a diabolical role in prolonging World War I, and in dragging the U.S. into the World War. It is important to understand how influential he was with President Wilson. President Wilson had once referred to him as his alter ego. In his seminal book, that has sold over five million copies since it was first published, Gary Allen states [4]:

“Colonel” House was front man for the international banking fraternity. He manipulated President Wilson like a puppet. Wilson called him “my alter ego.” House played a major role in creating the Federal Reserve System, passing the graduated income tax and getting America into WWI. House’s influence over Wilson is an example that in the world of super-politics the real rulers are not always the ones the public sees.

Col. House represents a new phenomenon – the emergence of “advisors” to the U.S. President who do not hold any formal office, are unelected, and are intimately tied to the international banking families, apart from being members of secret societies. These advisors hold the president of the United States “captive.” In his profound book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed, a Times (London) correspondent in Central Europe right up to the beginning of WW II, mentions that four men held President Wilson captive – Col. House, Rabi Stephen Wise, Justice Brandeis and Bernard Baruch. Reed states [5]:

Thus three out of the four men around President Wilson were Jews and all three, at one time or the other, played leading parts in the re-segregation of the Jews through Zionism and its Palestinian ambition ….

Such was the grouping around a captive president as the American Republic moved towards involvement in the First World War, and such was the cause which was to be pursued through him and his country’s involvement. After his election Mr. House took over his correspondence, arranged whom he should see or not receive, told cabinet officers what they were to say or not to say, and so on.

In order to understand how and why the preplanned WWI was prolonged it is important to know who influenced or controlled the elected leadership of the U.K. and the U.S. and what were the aims of these controllers. It is also important to know that Justice Louis Brandeis had founded a secret society by the name Parushim, for promoting Zionism in U.S.A. The initiate was asked to accept the following oath at a secret initiation ceremony [6] :

You are about to take a step which will bind you to a single cause for all your life. You will for one year be subject to an absolute duty whose call you will be impelled to heed at any time, in any place, and at any cost. And ever after, until our purpose shall be accomplished, you will be fellow of a brotherhood whose bond you will regard as greater than any other in your life – dearer than that of family, of school, of nation. By entering this brotherhood, you become a self-dedicated soldier in the army of Zion. Your obligation to Zion becomes your paramount obligation… It is the wish of your heart and of your own free will to join our fellowship, to share its duties, its tasks, and its necessary sacrifices.

Rabi Stephen Wise was on board regarding Parushim and, almost certainly, Bernard Baruch was also on board. Bernard Baruch’s connection with the international bankers is well known. It is also important to point out that the international bankers had planned World War I to, among other things, promote the Zionist cause. As Douglas Reed, using information provided in Chaim Weizmann’s book Trial and Error, stated in his book Far and Wide [7]:

The First World War began in 1914; long-memoried readers may recall that it appeared to be concerned with such matters as the rape of Belgium, ending Prussian militarism, and making the world safe for democracy. At its start Baron Edmond de Rothschild told Dr. Weizmann that it would spread to the Middle East, where things of great significance to Political Zionism would occur.

How did Edmond de Rothschild know right at the beginning of the war that the war would spread to the Middle East where things will work out to the great advantage of Political Zionism? He could only know this if it was planned that way and if he was one of the planners. And, as we will see, this was one of the reasons why World War I was deliberately prolonged.

Prolonging the War

The war was prolonged through several tactics. Firstly, all overtures of peace from the side of the Germans, and later the Ottomans, were defeated by agents of the international bankers. Secondly when Germans ran short of food, the deception named Belgian Relief Commission was set up by the international bankers through their front men, by which food was supplied to Germany and the German army, under guise of food supplies to Belgium, so that the German army could keep on fighting. Thirdly Germans were supplied with vital chemicals, metals, and other war materials by Allied Big Business, to enable them to keep fighting. Finally, wherever the Allied rulers seemed to resist the expansion of the war into the Middle East, they were eliminated politically, and if need be physically. They were then replaced by agents of the international banking cabal.

Sabotage of German Peace Offers of February 1915 and December 1916

A lone French soldier in a wet trench

Early in the war, on November 3, 1914, Britain declared the North Sea a theater of war. It blockaded ports of neutral countries illegally. On February 3, 1915, i.e. three months later, the Germans announced a counter blockade. They announced that with effect from February 18, 1915, the entire English channel along with territorial waters of Britain and Ireland would be considered a war zone. One must appreciate the fact that the Germans waited for three months before announcing a counter blockade. They were within their rights to do so.

However simultaneously, in February 1915, the Germans approached James W. Gerard, the U.S. ambassador in Germany, and expressed their desire to end the war. The German authorities wanted the ambassador to convey their desire for peace to President Wilson. They were however utterly unaware that President Wilson was a captive of the “advisors” installed around him by the international bankers. This German overture for peace is not something that is mentioned in textbooks but it has been mentioned by James W. Gerard in autobiography My First Eighty Three Years in America.

The response from Washington was most astonishing. Instead of commenting on the German proposal for peace, the White House directed the ambassador to communicate with Col. House instead of the President of U.S.A.! Dr. Stanley Montieth quotes from ambassador Gerard’s biography [8]:

In addition to the cable which I had already received informing me that Colonel House was “fully commissioned to act” he himself reminded me of my duty in his February 16 postscript. In his own handwriting these were the words from House. “The President has just repeated to me your cablegram to him and says he has asked you to communicate directly with me in future . . .” All authority, therefore had been vested in Colonel House direct, the President ceased to be even a conduit of communications. . . . He, who had never been appointed to any position, and who had never been passed by the Senate, was “fully instructed and commissioned” to act in the most grave situation. I have never ceased to wonder how he had managed to attain such power and influence.

One may notice that the German counter blockade was to begin on February 18, and the Germans communicated their desire for peace before that date as Colonel House’s handwritten postscript was dated February 16th. So it appears that the Germans expected that since the counter blockade represented an increased and new level of hostility, the Americans would be concerned to defuse the situation. They had no idea that Wilson was a stooge, a puppet in the hands of those who had planned a long war.

And one may recall that although the Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated as late as June 28, 1914, Col. House had, a month earlier, on May 29th, communicated to Wilson the arrangement that as soon as England indicated, France and Russia would pounce on Germany. So Colonel House wanted a long war, and destruction of both Germany and Russia, in accordance with the desire of the Zionist international bankers. Therefore, the ambassador never heard anything from Col. House about the peace proposal of February 1915. The peace proposal was sabotaged by Col. House.

Realizing that Col. House was in control of Wilson the Germans made another overture of peace in December 1916. This has been revealed by historian Leon Degrelle [9]. He mentions that on December 12, 1916, German officials expressed a desire for peace and talks with their adversaries. He also writes that Germans expressed the hope that Col. House would persuade the Allies. The freemason Col. House ruled out peace and thus helped sabotage the second peace initiative within the same year. The Germans did not know that Col. House had played an important role in precipitating the First World War by secretly entering into a secret agreement with Britain, well before Wilson’s re-election, that the U.S. would join the war, on the side of the Allies. Degrelle further writes [9]:

“On December 18, 1916, U.S. ambassador to Britain, Walter H. Page, relayed a peace offer to the Allies from Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria. On January 9, 1917, Prime Minister Lloyd George quickly repudiated the offering and declared that Britain would fight to the victory, which possibly prompted the Germans to re-initiate submarine warfare. Ambassador Page, in touch with President Wilson and Secretary of State Robert Lansing, defended British policies. This was William Jenning Bryan’s resignation, after he described Britain’s collapsing financial situation and the need for America’s neutrality.”

If the war had ended in 1916 million of lives could have been saved and destruction and devastation of numerous cities avoided. But the international bankers had planned a long war. It is important to note that, according to writer Juri Lina, who had access to records of numerous important Masonic lodges, Lloyd George was a Freemason, a Masonic Grand Master, and a Jew, whose real name was David Levi-Lowitt [10]. His connections with international bankers are very well known and he was installed in power as a result of an intrigue with the object of promoting the Zionist cause, as will be described later.

The picture of dead men among trees is a censored photo that was banned from publication by the French government. Those are dead Frenchmen mowed down by German guns during the Battle of the Frontiers in August/September 1914.

*

“Belgian Relief”

The next betrayal perpetrated by the international bankers took place in the form of the deception called Belgian Relief Commission. One finds many eulogized discussions about the work of this Commission. On the face of it this Commission was set up to supply food to the Belgian population. We quote below the typical version of the Belgian Relief Commission. It has been taken from an article by Elena S. Danielson that appeared in The United States in the First World War: An Encyclopedia, (edited by Anne Cipriano Venzon) [11]:

Herbert Hoover founded the Commission for Relief in Belgium (CRB) in London in October 1914 as a private organization to provide food for German-occupied Belgium. Belgium’s attempts at resistance to German military demands at the outbreak of the Great War had aroused much popular sympathy in England and the United States. A densely populated, industrialized country, Belgium depended on imports for three-quarters of its normal food supply. When the German Army began to requisition local foodstuffs and the British blockade cut off imported sources, 7 million Belgians faced severe hunger as the winter of 1914-1915 approached. When the American ambassador in London, Walter Hines Page, met with Belgian representatives, they concluded that Herbert Hoover was the best choice to administer some emergency relief action. The comprehensiveness of the program, however, was the result of Hoover’s personal determination to feed the entire nation.

But the real function, to which the Belgian Relief Commission was diverted, was hideous. Once Britain blockaded Germany, and the Germans were starved for food, the Belgian Relief Commission became a cover for sending food supplies to the German Army so that the German Army could keep on fighting. It may be useful to remember that Walter Hines Page was in the pay of Rothschilds. In his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve Eustace Mullins writes [12]:

The U.S. Ambassador to Britain, Walter Hines Page, complained that he could not afford the position, and was given twenty-five thousand dollars a year spending money by Cleveland H. Dodge, president of the National City Bank. H.L. Mencken openly accused Page in 1916 of being a British agent, which was unfair. Page was merely a bankers’ agent.

The “City” banks were always owned by the Rothschilds. Mullins writes [13]:

The Belgian Relief Commission was organized by Emile Francqui, director of a large Belgian bank, Societe Generale, and a London mining promoter, an American named Herbert Hoover, who had been associated with Francqui in a number of scandals which had become celebrated court cases, notably the Kaiping Coal Company scandal in China, said to have set off the Boxer Rebellion, which had as its goal the expulsion of all foreign businessmen from China. Hoover had been barred from dealing on the London Stock Exchange because of one judgment against him, and his associate, Stanley Rowe, had been sent to prison for ten years. With this background, Hoover was called an ideal choice for a career in humanitarian work.

Further the truth about Hoover is given in the following words [14]:

Hoover had also carried out a number of mining operations in various parts of the world as a secret agent for the Rothschilds, and had been rewarded with a directorship on one of the principal Rothschild enterprises, the Rio Tinto Mines in Spain and Bolivia.

It may also be useful to remember that [15]:

Wilson’s academic career was financed by gifts from Cleveland H. Dodge, director of National City bank and Moses Taylor Payne, grandson and heir of the founder of the National City Bank. Wilson then signed an agreement not to go to any other college.

Please note that the same Cleveland Dodge was the financier of both, Ambassador Walter Hines Page, and President Wilson. Dodge was working for the Rothschilds. The first person to expose the hideous reality about the Belgian Relief Commission was a British nurse named Edith Cavell who was running a hospital in Belgium at the time. In his book Secrets of the Federal Reserve, first published in 1951, Eustace Mullins wrote about this [16]:

Franqui and Hoover threw themselves into the seemingly impossible task of provisioning Germany during World War I. Their success was noted in Nordeutsche Allegmeine Zeitung, March 13, 1915, which noted that large quantities of food were now arriving from Belgium by rail. Schmoller’s Yearbook for Legislation, Administration and Political Economy for 1916 shows that one billion pounds of meat, one and a half billion pounds of bread, and one hundred and twenty one million pounds of butter had been shipped from Belgium to Germany in that year.

Mullins then narrates the story of Edith Cavell (Ibid pp 72, 73):

A patriotic British woman who had operated a small hospital in Belgium for several years, Edith Cavell, wrote to Nursing Mirror in London, April 15, 1915, complaining that “Belgian Relief” supplies were being shipped to Germany to feed the German army. The Germans considered Miss Cavell to be of no importance, and paid no attention to her, but the British intelligence service in London was appalled by Miss Cavell’s discovery, and demanded that the Germans arrest her as a spy. Sir William Wiseman, head of British Intelligence, and partner of Kuhn Loeb Company, feared that the continuance of war was at stake, and secretly notified the Germans that Miss Cavell must be executed. The Germans reluctantly arrested her and charged her with aiding prisoners of war to escape. The usual penalty for this offence was three months imprisonment, but the Germans bowed to Sir William Wiseman’s demands, and shot Edith Cavell, thus creating one of the principal martyrs of the First World War.

It is to be noted that after the war Sir William Wiseman settled in the United States and became one of the directors of the Kuhn Loeb & Co. This was his reward for having helped prolong the war. It may be noted that the head of the German secret service was Max Warburg, another international banker, whose brother Paul Warburg had emigrated to the U.S. in 1902 and was instrumental, in 1913, in having the Federal Reserve Act passed. Paul Warburg was a partner in Kuhn Loeb & Co. The deeply hidden international banking connections are fairly obvious to anyone who cares to find out.

Thus the “Belgian Relief” was used to prolong the war. Had the war ended in February 1915 there would have been no Bolshevik Revolution (instigated and bankrolled by the international bankers) and the war would not have been extended to the Middle East. But the plan of the bankers who instigated the war was to prolong the war as long as possible and to fulfill, as far as possible, their targets (as revealed at the outset of the war by Edmond de Rothschild to Weizmann).

Zionists Sabotage a Separate Peace Possibility with the Ottomans

The Zionists defeated another opportunity of securing peace with the Ottoman Empire in May 1917. It was in May 1917 that the U.S. Secretary of State Robert Lansing received a report that the Ottomans were tired of war and a separate peace with Britain could be secured thereby isolating Germany. But the Zionists did not want to keep the Ottoman Empire intact – they wanted its complete destruction so that they could secure a Jewish homeland in Palestine from the rubble of the Ottoman Empire. The Zionists got wind of the plan when President Wilson assigned Henry J. Morgenthau the duty of contacting the Ottomans. Henry J. Morgenthau had once been the U.S. ambassador in Turkey. Morgenthau was himself Jewish and he therefore decided to take Felix Frankfurter with him.

As Alison Weir writes in her book [17], Felix Frankfurter was a “paid political lobbyist and lieutenant” of Justice Louis Brandeis. Now Justice Brandeis was a highly unscrupulous individual when it came to his political purposes – he could go to any length to achieve these. It is the same Justice Brandeis who had set up the secret society Parushim for promoting Zionism in U.S. clandestinely, as mentioned previously. He was also one of the four men who held President Wilson captive.

If the Ottomans had made a separate peace with Britain, the Ottoman Empire would have survived intact and there would be no room for Israel. Alison Weir states [18]:

“Felix Frankfurter became part of the delegation and ultimately persuaded the delegation’s leader, former Ambassador Henry J. Morgenthau, to abandon the effort. U.S. State Department officials considered that Zionists had worked to scuttle this potentially peace-making mission and were unhappy about it. Zionists often construed such displeasure at their actions as evidence of American diplomats’ ‘anti-Semitism’.”

Thus the Zionists, controlled by the international bankers, “killed” still another opportunity for peace which could have saved millions of lives.

Two Russian soldiers stand in front of a ruined building in NE Turkey and look at the remains of Armenians killed by the Turks, part of the 1.5 million Armenians killed during WW1 by the Turks.

*

Intrigue in Britain to Open Up a Front in Palestine

In his deep book, Douglas Reed, narrates [19]:

Opposition to Zionism developed from another source. In the highest places still stood men who thought only of national duty and winning the war. They would not condone “hatred” of a military ally or espouse a wasteful “sideshow” in Palestine. These men were Mr. Herbert Asquith (Prime Minister), Lord Kitchener (Secretary for War), Sir Douglas Haig (who became Commander-in-Chief in France), and Sir William Robertson (Chief-of-Staff in France, later of Chief of the Imperial Staff).

How did the Zionists get rid of this highest level opposition to opening up a front in Palestine? They decided to get rid of the Prime Minister and Lord Kitchener. It is almost unknown to the world that the Bolshevik Revolution was actually a Zionist coup in which the funding and support came from international bankers. The Zionist international bankers were mortal enemies of Russia because of the allegiance of the royal family to Christianity. Researchers have dug out this little known aspect of World War I. This aspect reveals the profound, utterly ruthless and absolutely single-minded pursuit of the goal of world domination by the international bankers. Reed describes how the Zionists were able to eliminate Lord Kitchener. He writes [20]:

“Lord Kitchener was sent to Russia by Mr. Asquith in June 1916. The cruiser Hampshire, and Lord Kitchener in it, vanished. Good authorities concur that he was one man who might have sustained Russia. A formidable obstacle, both to the world-revolution there and to the Zionist enterprise, disappeared. Probably Zionism could not have been foisted upon the West, had he lived.”

The silent and sinister physical elimination of Lord Kitchener has also been consigned to oblivion through controlled history writing. Had Kitchener managed to salvage Russia the Zionist enterprise would have been almost permanently thwarted. That is why he had to be eliminated. In an overall view of things the elimination of Lord Kitchener was vital for the survival of the Zionist enterprise and fits a pattern of intrigue in which assassinations and installation of puppet politicians was crucial. World War I was triggered by an assassination and prolonged by various tactics including the elimination of Lord Kitchener.

The elimination of Prime Minister Asquith has been looked into by Cornelius. He writes [21]:

“Herbert Asquith, who had been prime minister since 1908, had begun, reluctantly, to consider a negotiated peace, but negotiations with the Zionists, through Weizmann and Balfour, provided another option for Britain, although not for Asquith. That option was the possibility of a formal, but secret, alliance between the Zionists and the Monarchy, whereby the British Monarchy would undertake to facilitate the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine and the Zionists would undertake to help bring America into the war on the side of the Allies, this assuring an Allied victory. An agreement with a British government would certainly be necessary, but British governments come and go, and a commitment from something less ephemeral than a British government would have been required by the Zionists. It is proposed that such an agreement took place. There seems to be no way to date it accurately but it seems likely to have occurred sometime around in October 1916.”

Cornelius writes further:

In early December 1916, a political crisis, probably engineered, occurred in Britain, and Herbert Asquith, was forced to resign. The denouement came on Dec. 6, 1916. That afternoon King George V summoned several prominent political figures, including Balfour and Lloyd David, to a conference at Buckingham Palace. Later that same evening, Balfour received a small political delegation, which proposed that the difficult situation could be resolved with Lloyd George as prime minister, provided Balfour would agree to accept the position of foreign minister, which he did.”

The Zionists thus eliminated Asquith, who did not wish to open a front in the Middle East for furtherance of the Zionist ambitions there. In his place they installed Lloyd David George, a Zionist, a Freemason and a man who worked for the international bankers. This was an odd situation – Balfour, who had been a Prime Minister from 1902 – 1905, had agreed to work as Foreign Minister of a far junior politician.

What concerns were so pressing that made Lord Balfour accept a junior position? Lord Balfour had long been inducted in the larger Secret Elite circle and was simply carrying out what the Secret Elite wanted him to do as part of their plans. It could only be the pressure of the Zionist international bankers with reference to the opening up of a military front in the Middle East and establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

Lest anyone has any doubts about who steered the policy when Lloyd David George became Prime Minister, it would be sufficient to look at the following statement in A.N. Field’s 1936 book, All These Things, in which he quotes a passage from the French book La Mystification des Peuples Allies authored by Andre Cheradame [22]:

For some years a group of financiers whose families, for the most part, are of German-Jewish origin, has assumed control of political power and exerts a predominant influence over Mr. Lloyd George. The Monds, the Sassoons, Rufus Isaacs those known as the representatives of the international banking interests, dominate Old England, own its newspapers, and control its elections. The close solidarity existing between Mr. Lloyd George and Jewish high finance is easily shown by the brief biographical sketches of some of the influential personages by whom he is surrounded . . . Each of the names represents not only an individual, but also a veritable tribe and head of immense financial interests.”

So the international bankers assumed control of the British government at the highest level by eliminating Prime Minister Asquith and Lord Kitchener, the former politically and the latter physically. Docherty and Macgregor have pointed out that the Secret Elite “identified and nurtured malleable politicians” across Europe and at home. They write (p 170, ref. [1]):

“Lloyd George’s love of good life and his insatiable sexual appetite rendered him vulnerable. His career could have ended several times over had the Secret Elite chosen to destroy him. Instead, they protected his reputation, defending him against damaging allegations and saved his career.”

Since 1910 Lloyd George had been in the “pocket of the Secret Elite.” What happened when Lloyd George became Prime Minister? This is best described by Douglas Reed who has rendered an invaluable service to mankind by writing his last book. He writes [23]:

The simultaneous triumph of Bolshevism in Moscow and Zionism in London in the same week of 1917 were only in appearance distinct events. The identity of the original source has been shown in an earlier chapter, and the hidden men who promoted Zionism through the Western governments also supported the world-revolution. The two forces fulfilled correlative tenets of the ancient Law: “Pull down and destroy . . . rule over all nations”; the one destroyed in the East and the other secretly ruled in the West.”

Reed further narrates that after the assumption of power by Lloyd David George the cabinet began pressing the army for opening up a front in the Middle East. The armed forces resisted this strategically senseless pressure. But the change of government had been wrought by the international bankers, the Rothschilds, only for one purpose, the purpose of promoting the cause of political Zionism, as revealed at the outset of war by Edmond de Rothschild to Weizmann. John Reed quotes Sir William Robertson (emphasis in original) [24]:

“Up to December 1916, operations beyond the Suez Canal were purely defensive in principle, the government and General Staff alike . . . recognizing the paramount importance of the struggle in Europe in need of give the armies there the utmost support. This unanimity between ministers and the soldiers did not obtain after the premiership changed hands . . . The fundamental difference of opinion was particularly obtrusive in the case of Palestine . . . The General Staff put the requirements at three additional divisions and these could only be obtained from the armies on the Western Front . . . The General Staff said the project would prove a great source of embarrassment and injure our prospects of success in France . . . These conclusions were disappointing to Ministers, who wished to see Palestine occupied at once, but they could not be refuted . . .”

This clearly shows that there was a difference of opinion between the government and the General Staff regarding the issue of sending British troops to occupy Palestine. Sir William Robertson was one of the four men, mentioned previously by Reed, who held British interests supreme and stood in the way of the expansion of war into Palestine.

Shipment of War- and Food-materials to Germany Despite Blockade

The international bankers, who also controlled Big Business, were able to prolong the war by supplying much needed materials, such as chemicals, copper, zinc, etc., as well as food to Germany through neutral countries, thereby helping Germany to fight longer. The major neutral countries were Denmark, Norway Sweden, and Netherlands. Finland was also part of the chain of nations supplying materials to the Germans. This is another little known aspect of World War I (and also World War II). This policy of trading with the enemy to make profits and to prolong the war was also utilized in the Second World War.

It is not that sentient and patriotic journalists and analysts were unable to fathom the international-bankers’ intrigue at that time – rather it was the overall control of media, and of book publishing, that has made it possible for the international bankers to deceive generations with controlled information and sanitized history which omits their hideous role. The story was brought out by journalists and analysts in England during the course of World War I, and subsequently by Admiral M.W.W.P. Consett, who was posted as naval attaché in Denmark during the war. Scandinavia was, of course, a traditional “listening post for warring nations.” In the year 1923 Consett wrote a book with a very interesting title, The Triumph of Unarmed Forces (1914-1918). Consett writes [25]:

“Our trade with Scandinavia was conducted and justified on the accepted security of guarantees that Germany should not benefit by it: here it is sufficient to say that the security was worthless.”

As he writes in a previous paragraph (p x):

“But from the very beginning goods poured into Germany from Scandinavia, and for over two years Scandinavia received from the British Empire and the Allied countries, stocks which, together with those from neutral countries, exceeded all previous quantities and literally saved Germany from starvation.”

Consett has given several tables that indicate that the amount of various items that were imported into Germany during the period 1913-1917. Please note that war broke out in August 1914. The total food imported into Germany from Sweden in the years 1913, 1914, 1915, 1916, 1917 was, respectively (in metric tons): 252 128, 262376, 561,234, 620,756, and 315,205 (Appendix VI, p 298). Please note that food imports from Sweden in 1917 were more than food imports from that country in 1913. The food items covered in these figures are “meat of all sorts, fish, dairy produce, eggs, lard, margarine.” The food items do not include “vegetable oils, beer, fish, oil, bone fat, coffee, tea, cocoa, horses, syrup and glucose, fruit, vegetables.” This was despite the naval blockade imposed by Britain. The corresponding figures for Denmark follow a similar pattern. No wonder a Danish naval officer wrote (p 295 of Consett’s book) to his British counterparts:

“I cannot help saying to you how much we Danish naval officers sympathize with you in having to live as you do amongst these people who are making fortunes in supplying your enemies with food when the officers and men of the Navy to which you belong are risking their lives in trying to blockade your enemies.”

The story of Germany acquiring other items – much needed coal, vital lubricants, metals such as zinc, copper, nickel, etc. arrived at German ports through Scandinavian countries. The details have been provided by Consett in various chapters of his book. For instance on p 180 of his book, Consett quotes the U.S. ambassador James W. Gerard as having recorded the following his diary [26]:

“Probably the greatest need of Germany is lubricating oil for machines.”

And yet lubricating oil did reach Germany from Scandinavian countries, as described by Consett. In fact Consett mentions that Ludendorff admitted:

“Lubricants provided us with some of our greatest problems . . .”

Similarly, other materials needed for explosives also arrived in Germany from Denmark and Holland despite the blockade. That the laxity in the blockade was intentional will become evident shortly. Consett states [27]:

“These oils and fats, both vegetable and animal, are used in normal times principally for food, soap, candles, lubricants and fuel; but in war time their importance is much enhanced on account of the glycerin which they contain.”

Glycerin is used in explosives and in 1915 Germany had discovered a process for extracting glycerin from sugar. This secret process was revealed only after the war. So important is glycerin that during the war the British Army collected all scraps of meat carefully in the British war zone, so that the fat could be used for extraction of glycerin.

That the British government was complicit in allowing vital materials to be shipped to Germany is evident from the following, which was revealed by Arnold White, a British journalist. In a packed meeting held at the Queen’s Hall London on March 4, 1917, Arnold White was speaker. According to A.N. Field, Arnold White [28]:

“. . . referred at length to the mysterious way in which Britain had allowed an extension of Norwegian territorial waters from the customary three miles accepted internationally to a four-mile limit. This extra mile allowed great American ships to slip through immune Norwegian waters with 10,000-ton cargoes of ore to Germany. He had enquired into this matter and he found that the political heads understood nothing of significance of the extension of Norwegian territorial waters to which Britain had consented. Those who instigated it, in Mr. White’s opinion, knew exactly what it meant. But for that extension he added, “it would have been impossible for the great American ships to have carried 100,000 tons of ores last year into Germany.”

What is difficult to understand about such matters that the politicians could not understand? One is reminded of the famous line by Upton Sinclair:

It is difficult to make a man understand when his salary depends upon not understanding it.”

It is quite clear that the British government allowed the extension of Norwegian territorial waters deliberately. The politicians were working for the international bankers, led by the Rothschilds. The government of David Lloyd George had been installed in power by them through intrigue, and possibly murder of Lord Kitchener that may have been made to look like drowning or disappearance of the cruiser Hampshire, to further their own Zionist interests. According to A.N. Field:

. . . Mr. Lloyd George had been among other things solicitor to the Zionist organization in England. In December 1916, Mr. Lloyd George succeeded Mr. Asquith as Prime Minister, holding office until October 1922. Throughout the greater part of his career Mr. Lloyd George had close Jewish associations, and the pronounced Jewish complexion of the Lloyd George Ministries was more than once subject of Press comment in Britain.”

Nine days later, on March 13, 1917, questions were asked in the House of Commons regarding the extension of territorial waters of Norway. The answer was that the government would do nothing about it.

The March 4, 1917 meeting had been organized by Dr. Ellis Powell, editor of the London Financial News. In this meeting Dr. Powell pointed out to the mysterious continuation of the activities of international bankers in Britain. This meeting was one of a series of meetings addressed by Dr. Powell and others, who had been agitating for exposing the “Hidden Hand” that was in control of Britain, and was betraying British interests. In fact, in 1917, Arnold White had written a book with title The Hidden Hand. The “Hidden Hand” was none other than the international bankers. The banks being run by bankers of German-Jewish origin in Britain were involved in activities that needed investigation. A resolution was passed at the March 4, 1917 meeting by all those present, numbering several thousand. They unanimously demanded closure of German banks in London. Field writes further [29]:

In seconding the resolution Dr. Ellis Powell, while seconding the resolution declared that German banks in the city were part of a vast organization of betrayal. The great outstanding fact of the war-time Hidden Hand agitation is that whenever it came to mention names and specific instances the names were mainly Jewish.”

The Russian revolution is relevant to WW1 – this 1919 poster was printed by the White Russians and depicts Trotsky as an evil Jew. Bottom right are Asiatic soldiers of the Red army executing a European Russian

In his speeches Dr. Powell had attacked Jacob Schiff by name as being behind activities that went against British interests. Schiff was the owner of the Kuhn Loeb & Co, who had also bankrolled the Bolshevik movement. Jacob Schiff was born in the same house where the founder of the Rothschild family was born. Dr. Powell also mentioned Schroder, a naturalized British citizen, a banker of German-Jewish extraction, as well as others.

It is therefore quite clear that the international bankers were behind all major attempts at prolonging the war. They not only surrounded the British Prime Minister and the U.S. President, but all surrounded the German Chancellor. They were all Zionists and Freemasons.

It is important to keep track of the dates because this enables a better overall comprehension of what was going on. The German peace proposals of February 1915 and December 1916 were sabotaged.

It was in December 1916 that Asquith was toppled, it was in February 1917 that the Russian Czar abdicated, it was in April 1917 that the U.S.A. entered the war, it was during, and soon after May 1917, that the Ottoman peace possibility was destroyed by the Zionists, it was in October 1917, that the agents of the international bankers, the Bolsheviks, took over Russia and it was in November 1917, that the Balfour Declaration, addressed to Baron Rothschild, was formally issued.

All these events were manipulated by Zionist international bankers and their Illuminati controlled freemasonic brethren who had planned and intrigued on a global scale for a very long time. These epochal victories of the Illuminati Zionist international bankers have since dictated the course of history right up to today.

The global turmoil is a continuation of the Zionist thrust for seizing world power and they have come very close to their target with the destruction of U.S.S.R., Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and the ongoing destruction of Syria, and with clouds over Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Pakistan. “Pull down and destroy . . . rule over all nations”! The United States of America and the United Kingdom are the biggest tools in the hands of international bankers. Despite their profound strengths these two countries have, on account of their control by Zionist and Illuminati international bankers, become the greatest threat to the very survival of the human species at this point in time.

Henry Makow Ph.D., himself Jewish, and full of anger at the anti-mankind policies of the Zionist international bankers, sums up World War I [30]:

“As mysteriously as it began, the war ended. In Dec. 1918, the German Empire suddenly “collapsed.” You can guess what happened. The banksters had achieved their aims and shut off the spigot. (Hence, the natural sense of betrayal felt in Germany, exacerbated by the onerous reparations dictated by the banksters at Versailles.)

What were the banksters’ aims? The Old Order was destroyed. Four empires (Russian, German, Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman) lay in ruins.

The banksters had set up their Bolshevik go-fers in Russia. (They sponsor many “revolutionary” movements as a way to eventually control all property themselves.) They ensured that Palestine would become a “Jewish” state under their control. Israel would be a perennial source of new conflict.

But more important, thanks to bloodbaths such as Verdun (800,000 dead), the optimistic spirit of Christian Western Civilization, Faith in Man and God, were dealt a mortal blow. The flower of the new generation was slaughtered. (See “The Testament of Youth” by Vera Brittain for a moving first-hand account.)”

Almost forty million humans died in World War I [31].

REFERENCES and NOTES

[1] Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor: Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War; Mainstream Publishers, 2013

[2] Carol White: The New Dark Ages Conspiracy: Britain’s Plot to Destroy Civilization; The New Benjamin Franklin House Publishing Co, 1980

[3] Guido G. Preparata: Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Made the Third Reich, Pluto Press 2005, p 24.

[4] Gary Allen: None Dare Call It Conspiracy, first published 1971; 2013 edition published by Dauphin Publications Inc., p 52.

[5] Douglas Reed: The Controversy of Zion, Bridger House Publishers Inc. 2012, p 242; emphasis added.

The story of Douglas Reed illustrates how the international bankers and their agents suppress truth and promote a sanitized history. In a book Far and Wide, Douglas Reed had dared to put the American History in its true European context. Ivor Benson writes in the Preface to The Controversy of Zion:

“In Europe during the war years immediately before and after World War II the name of Douglas Reed was on everyone’s lips; his books were being sold by scores of thousand, and he was known with intimate familiarity throughout the English-speaking world by a vast army of readers and admirers. Former London Times correspondent in Central Europe, he won great fame with books like Insanity Fair, Disgrace Abounding, Lest We Regret, Somewhere South of Suez, Far and Wide, and several others, each amplifying a hundredfold the scope available to him as one of the world’s leading foreign correspondents.

The disappearance into almost total oblivion of Douglas Reed and all his works was a change that could not have been wrought by time alone; indeed the correctness of his interpretation of the unfolding history of the times found some confirmation after what happened to him at the height of his powers.

After 1951, with the publication of Far and Wide, in which he set the history of the United States of America into the context of all he had learned in Europe of the politics of the world, Reed found himself banished from the bookstands, all publishers’ doors closed to him, and those books already published liable to be withdrawn from library shelves and “lost”, never to be replaced.”

This is how knowledge of history is controlled, distorted and even fabricated by the One World cabal of international bankers.

[6] Sarah Schmidt: The Parushim: A Secret Episode in American Zionist History;

American Jewish Historical Quarterly, Sep 1975-Jun 1976; 65. l – 4; AJHS Journal pg. 121.

[7] Douglas Reed: Far and Wide; first printed 1951; Angriff Pr June 1, 1981; part 2, chapter 2.

[8] Dr. Stanley Montieth: Brotherhood of Darkness, Bible Belt Publishing, Oklahoma City, U.S.A., 2000, p 65.

[9] Leon Degrelle: Hitler: Born at Versailles, Vol I, Institute for Historical Review, Torrance, California, 1992, p 255 – 259; cited by Deanna Spingola: The Ruling Elite: The Zionist Seizure of World Power, Trafford Publishing 2012, pp 622, 923

[10] Juri Lina: Architects of Deception, Referent Publishing 2004, chapter 7.

[11] See http://socialarchive.iath.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=commission-for-relief-in-belgium-1914-1930-cr.xml

[12] Eustace Mullins: The Secrets of the Federal Reserve: The London Connection; first published 1951; the 1991 edition by Bridger House publishing, p 83.

[13] Ibid, pp 69, 70.

[14] Ibid p 72.

[15] Eustace Mullins: The World Order: A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism, published by Ezra Pound Institute of Civilization, 1985

[16] Ref 11, p 72

[17] Alison Weir: Against Our Better Judgment: the hidden history of how the U.S. was used to create Israel; 2014, p 9.

[18] Ibid p 22.

[19] Ref. 5, p 247.

[20] Ibid p 248.

[21] John Cornelius: The Hidden History of the Balfour Declaration; Washington Report on Middle East Affairs;

http://www.wrmea.org/2005-november/special-report-the-hidden-history-of-the-balfour-declaration.html

[22] A.N. Field: All These Things, 1936, p 82.

[23] Ref 5, p 272

[24] Ref 5, p 252

[25] M.W.W.P. Consett: Triumph of Unarmed Forces (1914-1918), Williams and Norgate, London, 1923; p xi.

[26] Ibid p 180.

[27] Ibid p 167.

[28] Ref. 22, p 42.

[29] Ref. 22, p 42.

[30] Henry Makow : Bankers Extended WWI By Three Years; revised and reposted December 1, 2007, http://www.henrymakow.com/001583.html

[31] Ref. 15.

*

Related Posts:



 
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

 
Posted by on August 1, 2017, With 1863 Reads Filed under Of Interest, World War I (1914-1918). You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
 

 
 

8 Responses to "How and Why WWI Was Planned and Prolonged

AUGUST 1-2017

H.F.1269
 

 

 

 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 
 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF

ENGLAND

 AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS
 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/  ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/ ****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY / ****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS
THERESA MAY'S SURRENDER

 TO

HITLER'S EU

IN

SEPTEMBER 2017

 IS REMINISCENT

OF

PRIME MINISTER NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN'S

LACK OF GRIT

IN

1938

WHICH LED TO WORLD WAR 11

 IN SEPTEMBER 1939

AS THEN WE HAVE THE PHONEY WAR AND THE

BATTLE FOR BRITAIN.

What would those who died protecting our skies in 1940 think of the GREAT BETRAYAL by fellow citizens to their FOE of TWO WORLD WARS-

GERMANY

IN 2017 WE haven't  even had our Dunkirk as we haven't in reality even crossed the Channel in real earnest to claim our FREEDOM after 12 months since a majority voted for the return of THEIR COUNTRY LAW-CUSTOM- given away by TRAITORS in 1972.

BEING IN THE UNDERBELLY OF EUROPE WON'T HELP ONE IOTA!-GERMANY IS ADJUDICATOR!

WE HAVE STALEMATE!

THE ANSWER IS TO BOYCOTT GOODS FROM FRANCE AND GERMANY WHO ARE THE DRIVER AND FIREMAN OF THE EU EXPRESS.

WE BUY MORE FROM EUROPE THAN THEY BUY FROM US!

BUSINESSES IN THE MAIN  SUPPORT THE EU

WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A WAR OF SORTS!

In November 2005 we put the following bulletin on our EDP WEBSITE

H.F.1321 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S EU
 

Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

 

*

 

A further article from the ONLY sole INDEPENDENT world-wide respected International Currency Review under the heading:

 

*

 

*

CAN BRITAIN WITHHOLD ITS EC CONTRIBUTIONS?

 

PERTINENT LEGAL ADVICE BY LEOLIN PRICE, QUEEN’S COUNCEL

 

The following Legal Opinion was provided by the distinguished veteran constitutional lawyer, Leolin Price QC, in response to a request to consider the following questions:

1. )  Can ministers of the Crown be held culpable for the misuse of UK taxpayers’ money (i.e., of UK Government funds) by the European Commission and/or European Union; and

2. ) Can Britain withhold its contributions to the EC budget on the ground that UK taxpayers’ funds are being misused (embezzled, defrauded, misappropriated, misallocated, misrepresented, etc)? But in reality, these questions are themselves superfluous since, as exposed in this issue [of International Currency Review-Vol 30,4 dated October 10-2005, cstory@worldreports.org

 

  Britain’s EU membership was procured fraudulently, so that under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Britain has every right to leave the EU unilaterally and to cease payment.

 

1.    I preface this Opinion by acknowledging that I am not aware of any precedent for the sort of proceedings in court against Ministers of the Crown, whether civil or criminal, which I am asked to consider.

2.                  But there are two relevant principles of English law to be borne firmly in mind: first, that the King (or Queen) can do no wrong [We must make it clear at the outset that this does not include King Tony-whatever he may think]; secondly, that every subject of the Queen is subject to the RULE OF LAW and equal before the law.  There is no special privilege or status for Ministers or other officers of the Crown.

 

They are vulnerable and ought to be answerable in our courts if something which they have done is not properly authorised by law, infringes the rights of individuals and causes damage.

3.There is also learning about when an officer of the Crown can plead, as a defence to a claim by someone who has suffered from some act of that officer, that what was done was an ‘Act of State’.  A British subject cannot sue the Queen (because the ‘Queen can do no wrong’); and if an act, of which a British subject complains of, is in civil law, a tort, the officer cannot assert that the act complained of was an act, which had been authorised by the Crown (in reality the Government).

 

The Act of State is not available to the officer in that situation.  He must, if he can, show that what was done was a lawful exercise of some power lawfully conferred by

Act of Parliament

Or

Otherwise:

 

See, for example, Johnson v Peglar [1921] 2AC 262.

 

4.)             But a somewhat different line of modern authority R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p Smedley [1985] AC657 recognises that a person – in ex p Smedley, a British taxpayer and elector – may have a ‘sufficient interest’ to bring judicial review proceedings against Government authorities and Ministers.

 

·    Can Ministers of the Crown be held culpable for the misuse of taxpayers’ money (i.e. of UK Government funds) by the European union?

5.)             This is the first – and primary – question on which I am asked to advise [Leolin Price, Queen’s Counsel]

6.)             My answer is that our Courts will not recognise that any direct responsibility is imposed by Government or the Chancellor of the Exchequer for the subsequent application, by the Commission of the European Communities Act or the EU, of our taxpayers’ money which is paid over in accordance with the established legal procedures for making our contributions to the European Union.

7.)             But the history and circumstances of fraud, at the centre of the European Union and in ‘Member States’, and the conspicuous failure of the Commission or the European Union to establish any proper (and obviously necessary) accountancy controls over what happens to the money which is provided by ‘Member States’, has produced a situation in which the British elector and taxpayer may reasonably consider that it is a failure of duty for the Government, Chancellor of the Chequer and treasury to go on handing over our money to what he may reasonably consider is an organisation which is incapable of doing and unwilling to do, anything effective about the corrupt and fraudulent diversion of EU funds.  The history of incapacity and unwillingness includes the following:

(1)    The resignation of the whole Commission upon its acknowledgement of collective responsibility for corruption and fraud.

(2)    In spite of that admission of collective responsibility, the continuation in office of all but one of the resigned Commissioners.

(3)    A continuing failure to establish a minimum of accounting controls over the Commission’s expenditure of money at the centre or within ‘Member States’

(4)    Failure by the Commission, in response to acknowledged and massive misuse of EU money, to establish any regime with a minimum of efficiency and designed in accordance with modern accountancy standards to monitor the expenditure of EU money and to minimise its misuse.

(5)    The apparent inability of the Commission to prevent, or reasonably to combat and control, the corrupt and fraudulent misuse of EU money, including contributions from the United Kingdom.

 

8.           Faced with that history, a UK elector and taxpayer could reasonably expect his Government to suspend, wholly or partly, the further contribution of money from the United Kingdom to the European Union in the continuing absence of proper EU accountancy and controls to combat and contain fraud and corruption and other misuse of EU money; and could reasonably expect English Courts to support his claim for such suspension.

9.           In the circumstances, and before the next instalment of the UK contribution to the EU is to be paid, a UK taxpayer could apply for permission to bring judicial review proceedings challenging the making of the payment on the ground that no responsible Minister of Department of OUR Government could regard it as appropriate to pay over money without any reasonable expectation or even hope that the recipient EU institutions have made any reasonable arrangements to avoid its being, with other EU money, misused.  Experience, especially experience since the collective resignation of the Commission [in 1999], indicates that the money so contributed will be at serious risk of not being used for the purposes for which our Treaty obligations and our law require it to be contributed [sic].

10.  Will such judicial review proceed -ings be successful? The practical and realistic answer is that the [English] Courts will be reluctant to permit the review; but there is a presentable argument, and although there is no previous reported case which provides a precise precedent, it represents a logical development of what has been recognised in reported cases; and the continuing scandal about misuse of EU money provides ground for seriously contending that judicial review ought to be, and is, available to stop exposing UK money to the obvious risk of EU failure to avoid misuse.

11.      The withholding of Treaty-required contributions, which are at serious risk of not being properly used for Treaty purposes, is not-or arguably, is not- a breach of Treaty obligations. [Editor; However as is shown in this issue – of International Currency Review Vol 30,4 the treaty obligations themselves are not applicable,

since the

British Accession Treaty, and collective treaties, were signed for corrupt reward by agents of a Foreign Power.]

12.  The argument will be that the Chancellor of the Exchequer, as a Crown servant, is a guardian of taxpayers’ money and it is a breach of the duties involved in that guardianship to pay over money which, in the hands of the recipient Commission and the EU, will be at such serious risk of misuse.  The First defence will be that the payment is required by our Treaty obligations and by Acts of Parliament; but the answer to that is that the Treaty obligations and Parliament provide authority for payment to support Treaty purposes and NOT to expose the money to established and substantial risk of misuse.

13.   An alternative form of proceedings might be criminal proceedings against the Chancellor for misuse of public money under his control.  The argument for this is that the payment is a serious breach of public duty:  it condones and encourages and facilitates the misuse, and the misuse is foreseeable.  Those instructing me may consider it worthwhile attempting such a criminal case; and it may be that the launching of such a criminal case will achieve judicial discussion of the public duty and its breach.  It is, nevertheless, my opinion that such criminal proceedings will not be successful.

14.      , The better choice of proceedings is judicial review.

 

19th October 2004.

Leolin Price CBE QC,

10 Old Square,

Lincoln’s Inn,

London.

   

[Font altered-bolding & underling used-comments in brackets]

 

*         *          *

NOVEMBER/05

  For more details of Corruption and Skulduggery and Treachery in the EU and in the United Kingdom before and since the Second World War.

 

www.worldreports.org.

E-mail cstory@worldreports.org

 

And on the EDP bulletin board

 

Bulletins

308 & 309

 which are consistently among our top essays with viewers since their launch on October 10-2005 in line with the release of the details in the publication by the respected and Only INDEPENDENT International Currency Review journal which has been in existence since 1969 during which time it has acquired a World-Wide reputation for uncovering Conspiracies which have blossomed

with their dangerous fruit for well over 60 years, which has infected many of our supposed politicians in the arts of Treachery-Corruption and Deceit - still to this day.

  Many will say we have heard this all before but what they fail to realise is that the media –particularly the Press are owned in the main by individuals who have acquired great power of influence world-wide and are able to direct events their way.

  So when there are attempts to demolish a conspiracy theory you can bet that the major players in the press and media are no doubt involved.  What you have to ask yourself is which side of the argument is most likely to be believed taking into account what has happened in Europe and America over the past 60 years.

  We are involved in a catastrophic war in Iraq which we now all know was illegal and that our King Tony was only too pleased to follow his buddy George Bush and exclaim that they had now given Democracy to Iraq when in reality a civil war is now in progress which will lead to the fragmentation of Iraq into three separate nation States which will go against the grain with our federalist King Tony so keen on a United States of Europe who now appears to have trouble with his own rebels –which we are delighted to witness in a country once the home of the Mother of Parliaments until New Labour had other ideas.

 

*           *          *

NOV/05

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

***

TREASON

 

 

 

*

 FINALLY REMEMBER!!!

 

*DID YOU KNOW?

The City of London is governed by the Illuminati-Freemasons and they are governed by their god Lucifer/Satan. The Bank of England owns the Central Banks established around the world, and this is the real power of the modern British Empire.

One example is the United States Federal Reserve Bank , which is wholly owned by the Bank of England and her subsidiaries. Thus the world has been enslaved by the Illuminati-Free-Mason conspiracy which exacts her tribute through interest on their various currencies.

"Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown 'slave' colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful."

"The Crown" has nothing to do with the Queen. It is a private corporation led by the Illuminati. (See: +(1)+(1)+(1)

Government Conspiracies - World of Lies - Award Winning Documentary

AUGUST - 2010

H.F.1321-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S EU
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/
Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

 YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

 THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

 SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
       

HUMANS ARE FREE

CLIMATE CHANGE A HOAX-TRUMP KNOWS IT-NOW YOU KNOW IT!

 
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

 HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 
UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

 

BACK TO:

SEPTEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-  PART 1 -2017