- (1994 -Official Website - NOVEMBER - PT 6 - 2019 )-

     PART 1 -  PART 2   -  PART 3   -PART  4  - PART 5 -   PART 6  - 

OCT H 1 2
3 4 5  6

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019      MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019      

  MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2019

       MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

 

A MONTH TO REMEMBER

RECLAIMING

 

 AFTER 46 YEARS

WITHIN

  HITLER'S PLANNED

 SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION

 OUR

 ENGLISH FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION AND

COUNTRY.

 

MARCH 29, 2019

VICTORY

FOR

 ENGLISH FREEDOM DAY

 

 ONE SHOULD ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN WALES AND SCOTLAND PREFERRED TO REMAIN AS SLAVES WITHIN HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

IN OR OUT OF THE EU THE ENGLISH PEOPLE PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO THEIR NEIGHBOURS PARTICULARLY IN SCOTLAND WHERE THEY STILL RECEIVE A HIGHER PER CAPITA FIGURE , AS IT HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS.

A UNITED BRITISH ISLES IS A BOUNTY FOR EVERYONE IN OUR SHARED ISLAND HOME

FOR  SECURITY-TRADE-PROSPERITY AND PEACE.

LET US UNITE AND THE WORLD WILL SEE US AT OUR BEST.

OUR SHARED HISTORY  AND SACRIFICE IS OUR STRENGTH AND PURPOSE.

 

H.F.1773

*

 
Richard Littlejohn
 

  1. Richard Littlejohn for the Daily Mail | Daily Mail Online

    Arise

    Baron

    Farage

    of

    Brexit!

     

    Thanks to his magnanimity

     

     

    we can breathe a little

     

     

    easier...but there's still

     

    a

     

    MONTH

     

    TO

     

    GO.

    NIGEL FARAGE has done the right thing

    . It won't have been easy. No politician has ever been so

    vilified from all sides

     

    He's been attacked repeatedly,

     

    both verbally and  physically. He

     

    was being set as the man who

     

    wrecked BREXIT, a cause he has

     

     with single-minded championed

     

    courage and determination

     

     for three decades.

     

    Yet in announcing that his party

     

    was standing aside to give the

     

    Tories a clear run in constituencies

     

    they already hold.

     

    Farage demonstrated true

     

    statesmanship . Even that must

     

    have been a difficult decision,

     

    given that there are plenty of

     

    Conservative MPS who have spent

     

    the past few years trying to

     

    frustrate the result

     

    of the

     

    REFERENDUM

     

    But Farage now accepts

     

    that the only way we're

     

    going to escape the suffocating

     

    embrace of the

     

    EUROPEAN UNION

     

    is by electing a

     

     

    CONSERVATIVE

     

    GOVERNMENT

     

    LED BY

     

    BORIS

     

    JOHJOHNSON...

     

    In the Euro elections, Farage's crew

     

    polled  5,248,533

     

    That's nine times as many as the

     

     SNP

     

    But while the Scots Nats strut their

     

    stuff and talk about backing a

     

    CORBYN COALITION

     

    in exchange for another indy

     

    referendum,

     

    the Bad Boys of Brexit

     

    can only hope to deny the Tories a

     

    MAJORITY.

     

    That's why Farage has taken the

     

    sensible course.

     

     

    To claim that he had blinked first,

     

    or caved under

     

    Conservative pressure, is to do him

     

    a grave disservice.

     

    This should be a time of Tory

     

    gratitude ,not gloating.

     

    While realpolitik means that

     

    Boris can't order Conservatives

     

    to stand down in favour of

     

    Faragistes, the Tories could agree

     

    not to campaign too hard in the

     

    Brexit Party's target seats. It would

     

    be an elegant solution.

     

    Even back in May when

     

    Mother Theresa

     

    was still flogging her dismal

     

    defeatest dead horse'deal',

     

    this column proposed an alliance

     

     between

     

    Boris Johnson and Farage

     

    as the only realistic route out of

     

    our

     

    EUROPEAN PURGATORY

     

    Gary caricatured the pair as

     

    Morecombe and Wise,

     

     

    'Bring Me Sunshine,

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Bring Me Brexit'.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Both men played a key role in

     

    securing victory in the

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    2016 REFERENDUM.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Both believe Britain has a bright

     

    future as a

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    SOVEREIGN NATION,

     

     

     

     

     

    once we cast off the shackles of the

     

     

     

     

     

     

    SCIEROTIC, CORRUPT,

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ANTI-DEMOCRATIC

     

     

     

     

     

     

    SUPERSTATE

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    So what could possibly be wrong

     

    with them burying their differences

     

     

     

    to

     

     

     

     

     

    comprehensively defeat

     

     

     

     

     the

     

     

     

    existential threat to our

     

     

     

     

    PROSPERITY

     

     

     

     

    AND

     

     

     

     

     

    FREEDOM

     

     

     

     

    posed by the Corbynistas and the

     

     

     

    Rag, Tag and Bobtail army of

     

     

     

    Lib Dems, Scots Nats and Greens?

     

     

     

     

    Farage's magnaninity yesterday

     

    was a real shaft of sunshine in

     

    what has up until now been a

     

    depressing election campaign.

     

    Perhaps today we can breathe a

     

    little easier, but there's still a

     

    A

     

    MONTH TO GO.

     

     

    Between now and December 12,

     

    Farage has one final service he can

     

    perform for our nation,

     

    by smashing the Labour vote

     

    in Leave-inclined Northern and

     

    coastal areas and helping return

     

    a Tory government -

     

    ideally with a couple of dozen

     

    BREXIT PARTY MPs

     

    TO KEEP BORIS

     

    HONEST.

     

    If he can do that successfully

     

    Britain and Boris - will owe him

     

    big time. He will richly deserve to

     

    spend more time with LBC radio

     

    microphone, or on Fox News,

     

    by serving as Donald Trump's

     

    warm-up act on on the American

     

    lecture circuit.

     

    A seat in the Lords (which he

     

    claims Boris offered), or a

     

    knighthood should be his reward,

     

    as a basis for negotiation.

     

     

     

     

     

    BARON FARAGE

     

     

     

    of

     

    BREXIT

     

    HAS A NICE RING TO

     

     

     IT.

     

     

    *

     

    [This is an most interesting  and  

     

     

    extensive article on a subject which 17.4

     

     

    million patriots have been kept waiting for

     

     

     

    an astonishing

     

    40

     

    months

     

    by

     

     a so-called Conservative Party

     

    of which many of its MPs

     

    failed to honour

     

    their promise to abide by

     

     the democratic decision of

     

    the PEOPLE

     

    in a

     

    REFERENDUM

    The result of their unaccustomed action will

    have grave consequences in the future as the

    electorate will have in their minds that their

    democratic decision may be ignored and

    therefore it will no longer hold its sacred place

    as it

    still does today in its homeland in the

     

    cantons  and valleys

     

    of

     

    SWITZERLAND.

     

     

    THOSE TURNCOATS acted in the same vein as

    the evidence of the past of the behaviour of the

    EU to not take notice of a NO VOTE but

    continue negotiations until the political

    elite in the country concerned finally

    obtain the only result that the EU would accept

     

     

    YES!]

     

    *

     

     

    FULL ARTICLE

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CHANGES OF

     

    FORM ARE OURS!]

     

NOVEMBER 11-2019

H.F.1924

 

 

*

 
NOVEMBER 2,2019

Daily Mail

 

 

 

FIRST CLASS

DEGREE

IN

ELECTION FRAUD

An undergraduate exposing our lax voting system by publicly bragging she'll vote

TWICE

-at home, and at university... Labour's far-left activists telling followers to

'VOTE OFTEN'

...safe Tory seats inexplicably turning Labour. So when will polling chiefs

DO SOMETHING ABOUT A...

 

 

undergraduate's tweet boasting

 

 

she'll vote twice exposes ...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7641065/Undergraduates-tweet...

1 day ago · First class degree in election fraud: Undergraduate's tweet boasting she'll vote twice exposes our lax voting system - as Labour's far-left followers tell activists to 'vote often'

  

 *  *  *

 

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[NOVEMBER  2,2019]

H.F.1916

 

 

 

 

*
 

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Sing-song in the Commons sums

 

 

up how absurd our MPs have become Sing - song in the

 

 

Commons as Parliament was prorogued sums...

 

LAND

 OF

HOPELESS

TORIES

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7458221/amp/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-Sing-song...

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Land of hopeless Tories! Sing-song in the Commons as Parliament was prorogued sums up how absurd our MPs have become Sing-song in the Commons as Parliament was prorogued sums ...

 

 

*

 

[The present political parties in Westminster cannot be trusted to protect our world respected

ENGLISH INHERITANCE

 OF A

FREE

INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

 

therefore there should be a patriotic lobby in Parliament to prevent the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN"

 being ever again

AT RISK

by

TRAITORS WITHIN.]

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!].

 

 

 

 

SEPTEMBER 13,2019

 

 

H.F.2021

*
 

DAILY TELEGRAPH

 

 

No self-respecting country would accept this deal-

MPs must vote it down

By DANIAL HANNAN

SUNDAY, MARCH 3,2019

 

The deal will come  before Parliament next week represents a devastating failure of

BRITISH STATECRAFT

It would keep most of the costs of EU membership while junking most of the benefits. It would require Britain to cede part of its territory to

FOREIGN JURISDICTION.

It would allow

 BRUSSELS

 to

CONTROL

OUR COMMERCE with NON-EU STATES

EVEN AFTER WE

LEAVE.

MPs

 who believe in parliamentary sovereignty

should

VOTE AGAINST IT.

*

MPs

 who believe in the

UNION

 should 

VOTE AGAINST IT .

*

MPs

WHO BELIEVE IN FREE TRADE

 should 

VOTE AGAINST IT .

*

MPs

who believe that there  is such a thing as

NATIONAL HONOUR

and who recognise that we are being treated in a calculatedly vindictive way should toss it out with especial force.

They should do so even if the alternative is a

DELAY

 IN

BREXIT.

They should do so, indeed, even though such a delay might allow the Mandelsons and Blairs to step up their campaign for a

SECOND  REFERENDUM.

A postponement, undesirable as it is, is less damaging than accepting permanently

DISADVANTAGEOUS TERMS.

As Lord King,

the former Bank of England Governor

 put it

:There are arguments for remaining in the EU

and arguments for leaving.

But there is no case whatsoever for giving up the benefits of remaining without  obtaining the benefits of

LEAVING.

WE keep being told that unreasonable

Eurosceptics

are their own worst enemies and that, if

 BREXIT

 is now thwarted, it will somehow be their fault.

 

But it is hard to think of a more unreasonable proposition than that all that matters is coming back with something that can techically  be termed

BREXIT.

Even after 30 months. Leavers are still being subtly patronised. It is assumed that the dim-witted oafs cannot possibly have weighed the costs and benefits before voting, and that all that the Government needs to do is to show them something that has BREXIT written on it in bright  , shiny letters.

In fact, Leave voters understand that some forms of Brexit are better than others. They understand too, that some are  so BAD that they would be worse than either

STAYING or LEAVING

The EU, of course, has understood this

 FROM THE START

[THE MERKEL-MAY CLOSE ASSOCIATION GOING BACK MANY DECADES.]

As Michel Barnier put it in 2016,

"I'll have done my job if, in the end, the exit terms are so bad that the British would rather stay in the EU."

Such an attitude on the part of Brussels was to be expected.

The readiness of our negotiators to go along with it was not.

Far from being uncompromising, the supposed hardliners in the ERG have accepted a series of CONCESSIONS, including a continuing role of the [MISCHIEVOUS]

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE

AFTER WE LEAVE.

 

21 months of non-voting membership, an absurdly one-sided arbitration mechanism and a

30 BILLION

FINANCIAL SETTLEMENT.

THAT NO INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATOR WOULD UPHOLD.

They have accepted all these things despite  the conspicuous absence of the trade deal that was supposed to be quid pro quo.

Eurosceptic Tories have dug in on only one point, namely the

BACKSTOP, and with good reason. No self respecting country would allow the regulatory annexation of part of its territory in exchange for... well,

FOR NOTHING AT ALL,

really since the promised

TRADE DEAL

HASN'T MATERIALISED.

At least EU membership, unlike the

BACKSTOP

comes with an exit mechanism.

We are thus being asked to replace a temporary arrangement with a permanent one

THAT ALONE IS ENOUGH TO REFUSE...

[ This is a lengthy article of which we are barely half way through which we will continue shortly. For many months now we have been unable to download articles from the Daily Mail-Daily Telegraph and others ,which therefore means resorting to fingers and in that we follow the action of our brave archers at Crecy and raise  two fingers aloft in their image to our enemy within who wish to sell out their once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE-the burial grounds at home and abroad of our brave patriotic service men and women are no doubt in spirit with those today in their just fight for that which no one has a right to give away-the historic

" Freedom and Liberties of ENGLAND' "

which is in our TRUST for future generations to come.]-

TO BE CONTINUED.]

*

One thing, at any rate, ought to be beyond dispute, Britain should not sign a permanent treaty under duress.  The

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

 has been proposed in a

VENGEFUL SPIRIT

Eurocrats have understandably concluded that we have no bottom line, that the British are negotiating as Herman Van Rompuy, the former European Council president, reportedly put it last week,

"With their backs against a wall, the abyss in front of their eyes and a knife on their throat. WE are nearly there."

There was a time when that attitude would have been enough to convince us politely to decline the EU's TERMS and forge our own way.

are we still the nation we used to be?

[REGRETFULLY THE SIGNS ARE NEGATIVE!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

SUNDAY, MARCH 3, 2019

 

 

H.F.1822

*

 

SUNDAY EXPRESS

 

 

Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies MP
 

ISN'T the House of Commons there to represent the people of the United Kingdom? It might seem a strange question but are MPs actually rtepresenting people on key issues?

Many MPs now seem to advocate representing the public on a politically correct tick box. Not a day goes by without someone mentioning the need to

 "represent/reflect the communities we serve"

Back in the real world, in terms of truly representing the people (rather than obsessing about someone's gender or skin colour) how are you feeling?

 Absolutely abysmally I'd say.

The most head-grabbing current example is Parliament's continuing mission to try to

frustate

BREXIT

We know the House of Commons is out of touch on

[HITLER'S]

EU.

Around 75 per cent of MPs voted for or campaigned for

REMAINING IN THE EU.

[A REMAINER PARLIAMENT]

However the [June 23-2016] result was that people voted to

LEAVE

and yet still many MPs seem to think they can cast aside public opinion like an old sweet rapping and carry on as they were before the public [their masters] came up with an answer

THEY DID NOT LIKE.

['THE BASTARDS'

AS  DAILY MAIL'S QUENTIN LETTS HAS RIGHTLY CALLED THEM. ]

We knew the EU would try to do that but shouldn't we expect better from our own MPS?

After all, they were telling voters this was a once in a lifetime chance to record

THEIR OPINION .

This does not sit comfortably with many MPs spending every waking hour

since

TRYING TO DISHONOUR THE RESULT

especially when most MPs elected since the referendum stood on a manifesto

 with a clear commitment to implement

BREXIT

YOU do not have to look far for another example of the chasm between

PARLIAMENT  and PEOPLE

The public's view on law and order compared to the Government's are chalk and cheese more police and want them on the streets

They want tougher action on criminals and tougher sentences for most crimes.

In a poll a few years ago asking views on a sentencing escalator (repeat offenders given increasing harsh sentences for committing the same crime again)

90 per cent of the public were in favour.

So, are we doing that?

NO

Not only are we not, this government is now touting the idea that there should be a presumption against short sentences-possibly six months or fewer. You might have thought, "Great, we shall now get longer sentences-Alas, no, Short sentences will be replaced by

NO SENTENCES AT ALL

It is a ludicrous suggestion yet, with all eyes on

BREXIT

It is genuinely being pursued by the

[SO-CALLED]

Ministry of Justice.

Never mind the public, just ask police officers what they think, then brace yourself...

IT IS HARD TO GET SENT TO PRISON AS IT IS: YOU EITHER HAVE TO COMMIT A REALLY SERIOUS CRIME OR OFFEND SOMANY TIMES THAT THERE'S NO OTHER OPTION. SOMEONE MANAGED TO BE CONVICTED OF

62 SHOPLIFTING OFFENCES

BEFORE FINALLY BEING SENT TO

 JAIL.

OFFENDERS SENTENCED TO SIX MONTHS OR FEWER LAST YEAR HAD RACKED UP AN AVERAGE OF

55 previous offences each.

THEY HAD also received an average of five community orders, which clearly didn't work.

Around 2000 knife offenders received six months or fewer. In a knife crime epidemic, who in their right minds would not want to see these offenders in prison. At least, while they are serving their sentences

THEY ARE NOT CONTINUING OFFENDING.

THEN, there's overseas aid. We spend more on that than on policing and double what we spend on our

[SO-CALLED]

JUSTICE BUDGET

This money is fixeds, ring-fenced and

WILL ONLY INCREASE

People do not generally share politicians' desire to waste money as if it is going out of fashion to make themselves feel better.

To add insult to injury, people then hear of billions spent on ridiculous projects or syphoned off by corrupt officials. This happens in a department whose mission is to spend as much as possible so there can be a luvvie hug when we hit a random target. As with the overseas aid cult, there's the religion of

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which has a huge following in Parliament.

Many MPs are obsessed with tick boxes' so-called

POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION

They refuse to speak the truth for fear of upsetting minority groups and twist the facts to suit the agenda.

Heaven help anyone who challenges this cosy politically-correct concensus, I have tried.

Yet most people are fed up with political correctness. Hardly anyone identifies as a feminist. They just want men and women to be treated fairly and equally. But Parliament makes our laws and so politically correct tentacles spread.

These are key issues where Parliament is not representing our vies and I haven't even started on HS2. And we know many MPS think of voters who do not share their Left-wing or Remain views.

Being out of sync with the

PUBLIC

should be of grave concern. For a democracy to work, people have to feel that those in the Commons

SPEAK FOR THEM.

This isn't happening and MPs should fear the backlash that will come if this continues.

*  *  *

[Need we look elsewhere for the great problems we are experiencing at the present time to extract our once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

FROM

HITLER'S PLAN

FOR

GERMANY TO DOMINATE

EUROPE

IN THE

PEACE]

 

*

 

THE PUBLIC

HEY WANT MORE POLICE AND WANT THEM ON THE STREETS.

PREVIOUS PRIME MINISTERSW AND HOME SECRETARIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CARNAGE ON THE STREETS TODAY IN MARCH 2019.

 

[The EDP for decades has many bulletins showing how many important  public issues have and are still being ignored by successive governments. As the excellent article above has shown it is the dim-witted members of the House of Commons who have been there too long that has created this Mad Parliament feature. AS in Cromwell's Day the way to deal with the trash is to kick them out of Parliament. WE have advocated for decades that MPS should only SERVE THEIR COUNTRY for a TERM-at present 5 years. At present many MPs look on the job as for life which reflects in their arrogance and treasonable behaviour. The change will enable those who wish give up 5 years TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY instead of THEMSELVES  from across our society, to do so.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

SUNDAY EXPRESS

-Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies  MP
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

MARCH 10,2019

*  *  *

[A REMINDER! FROM THE PAST]

OF A COUNTRY RIDDLED WITH TREASON]

The EU’s control structure in Britain

The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.  An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside. This is not an exhaustive list.

The Bilderbergers – Europe wide

A society of 140 top politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state:  96%. All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.  This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader. They threw Margaret Thatcher out and replaced her with a compliant Bilderberger, John Major. Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), are Bilderbergers and work for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent. That is why your vote makes no difference.

Britain is the target

Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target. They know from our long history and two world wars the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. 

   For that reason the EU’s British sympathisers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.

    That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.

The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department

Controls development of the EU. Set up by Adolf Hitler in 1942, who created the EU as the EEC in 1940.  Recruits British politicians including

EDWARD HEATH

 

Geoffrey Rippon and Roy Jenkins

, and major British newspapers for the EU.  Some of our top politicians are DVD assets now (possibly Milliband, Brown, Blair), we may not know who until their deaths.

The Conservative Party

The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.  The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.   

    The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he lied). They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.

Labour and the Lib Dems

Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years. A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship. We have a one party state. Nigel Farage leader of UKIP and Nick Griffin of the BNP both work for the EU.

The Freemasons:

The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 active freemasons.  Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are. See http://www.bilde4rberger.org/masons.html

http://www.bilderberg,org/masons.html

 to find out.

(It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF).

The Legal Profession:

Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.  British justice is now utterly corrupt. See our August issue. Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime. They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.

Common Purpose:

The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved. Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.

   Common Purpose

 

 

have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.  Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £167 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.

 

Among all the above are about 30,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 "useful idiots "implementing the EU’s corruption, and feeding off its gravy train. But there are 62 million of us; we need to shake off their disinformation, realise the truth, and kick them all out of office. To stop these 55,000 fraudsters, we need just 10,000 of you.

David Noakes.

http://eutruth,org.uk.

 

H.F.1828

 

*

SUNDAY EXPRESS

 

 

Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies
 

TORY MP

FOR SHIPLEY

ISN'T the House of Commons there to represent the people of the United Kingdom? It might seem a strange question but are MPs actually rtepresenting people on key issues?

Many MPs now seem to advocate representing the public on a politically correct tick box. Not a day goes by without someone mentioning the need to

 "represent/reflect the communities we serve"

Back in the real world, in terms of truly representing the people (rather than obsessing about someone's gender or skin colour) how are you feeling?

 Absolutely abysmally I'd say.

The most head-grabbing current example is Parliament's continuing mission to try to

frustate

BREXIT

We know the House of Commons is out of touch on

[HITLER'S]

EU.

Around 75 per cent of MPs voted for or campaigned for

REMAINING IN THE EU.

[A REMAINER PARLIAMENT]

However the [June 23-2016] result was that people voted to

LEAVE

and yet still many MPs seem to think they can cast aside public opinion like an old sweet rapping and carry on as they were before the public [their masters] came up with an answer

THEY DID NOT LIKE.

['THE BASTARDS'

AS  DAILY MAIL'S QUENTIN LETTS HAS RIGHTLY CALLED THEM. ]

We knew the EU would try to do that but shouldn't we expect better from our own MPS?

After all, they were telling voters this was a once in a lifetime chance to record

THEIR OPINION .

This does not sit comfortably with many MPs spending every waking hour

since

TRYING TO DISHONOUR THE RESULT

especially when most MPs elected since the referendum stood on a manifesto

 with a clear commitment to implement

BREXIT

YOU do not have to look far for another example of the chasm between

PARLIAMENT  and PEOPLE

The public's view on law and order compared to the Government's are chalk and cheese more police and want them on the streets

They want tougher action on criminals and tougher sentences for most crimes.

In a poll a few years ago asking views on a sentencing escalator (repeat offenders given increasing harsh sentences for committing the same crime again)

90 per cent of the public were in favour.

So, are we doing that?

NO

Not only are we not, this government is now touting the idea that there should be a presumption against short sentences-possibly six months or fewer. You might have thought, "Great, we shall now get longer sentences-Alas, no, Short sentences will be replaced by

NO SENTENCES AT ALL

It is a ludicrous suggestion yet, with all eyes on

BREXIT

It is genuinely being pursued by the

[SO-CALLED]

Ministry of Justice.

Never mind the public, just ask police officers what they think, then brace yourself...

IT IS HARD TO GET SENT TO PRISON AS IT IS: YOU EITHER HAVE TO COMMIT A REALLY SERIOUS CRIME OR OFFEND SOMANY TIMES THAT THERE'S NO OTHER OPTION. SOMEONE MANAGED TO BE CONVICTED OF

62 SHOPLIFTING OFFENCES

BEFORE FINALLY BEING SENT TO

 JAIL.

OFFENDERS SENTENCED TO SIX MONTHS OR FEWER LAST YEAR HAD RACKED UP AN AVERAGE OF

55 previous offences each.

THEY HAD also received an average of five community orders, which clearly didn't work.

Around 2000 knife offenders received six months or fewer. In a knife crime epidemic, who in their right minds would not want to see these offenders in prison. At least, while they are serving their sentences

THEY ARE NOT CONTINUING OFFENDING.

THEN, there's overseas aid. We spend more on that than on policing and double what we spend on our

[SO-CALLED]

JUSTICE BUDGET

This money is fixeds, ring-fenced and

WILL ONLY INCREASE

People do not generally share politicians' desire to waste money as if it is going out of fashion to make themselves feel better.

To add insult to injury, people then hear of billions spent on ridiculous projects or syphoned off by corrupt officials. This happens in a department whose mission is to spend as much as possible so there can be a luvvie hug when we hit a random target. As with the overseas aid cult, there's the religion of

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which has a huge following in Parliament.

Many MPs are obsessed with tick boxes' so-called

POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION

They refuse to speak the truth for fear of upsetting minority groups and twist the facts to suit the agenda.

Heaven help anyone who challenges this cosy politically-correct concensus, I have tried.

Yet most people are fed up with political correctness. Hardly anyone identifies as a feminist. They just want men and women to be treated fairly and equally. But Parliament makes our laws and so politically correct tentacles spread.

These are key issues where Parliament is not representing our vies and I haven't even started on HS2. And we know manyMPS nthink of voters who do not share their Left-wing or Remain views.

Being out of sync with the

PUBLIC

should be of grave concern. For a democracy to work, people have to feel that thoswe in the Commons

SPEAK FOR THEM.

This isn't happening and MPs should fear the backlash that will come if this continues.

*  *  *

[Need we look elsewhere for the great problems we are experiencing at the present time to extract our once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

FROM

HITLER'S PLAN

FOR

GERMANY TO DOMINATE

EUROPE

IN THE

PEACE]

 

*

[THE PUBLIC

THEY WANT MORE POLICE AND WANT THEM ON THE STREETS.

PREVIOUS PRIME MINISTERS AND HOME SECRETARIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CARNAGE ON THE STREETS TO DAY IN 2019.

 

[The EDP for decades has many bulletins showing how many important  public issues have and are still being ignored by successive governments. As the excellent article above has shown it is the dim-witted members of the House of Commons who have been there too long that has created this Mad Parliament feature. AS in Cromwell's Day the way to deal with the trash is to kick them out of Parliament. WE have advocated for decades that MPS should only SERVE THEIR COUNTRY for a TERM-at present 5 years. At present many MPs look on the job as for life which reflects in their arrogance and treasonable behaviour. The change will enable those who wish give up 5 years TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY instead of THEMSELVES  from across our society, to do so.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

SUNDAY EXPRESS

-Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies
 

TORY MP

FOR SHIPLEY

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

MARCH 10,2019

*  *  *

[A REMINDER! FROM THE PAST]

OF A COUNTRY RIDDLED WITH TREASON]

The EU’s control structure in Britain

The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.  An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside. This is not an exhaustive list.

The Bilderbergers – Europe wide

A society of 140 top politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state:  96%. All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.  This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader. They threw Margaret Thatcher out and replaced her with a compliant Bilderberger, John Major. Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), are Bilderbergers and work for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent. That is why your vote makes no difference.

Britain is the target

Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target. They know from our long history and two world wars the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. 

   For that reason the EU’s British sympathisers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.

    That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.

The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department

Controls development of the EU. Set up by Adolf Hitler in 1942, who created the EU as the EEC in 1940.  Recruits British politicians including

EDWARD HEATH

 

Geoffrey Rippon and Roy Jenkins

, and major British newspapers for the EU.  Some of our top politicians are DVD assets now (possibly Milliband, Brown, Blair), we may not know who until their deaths.

The Conservative Party

The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.  The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.   

    The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he lied). They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.

Labour and the Lib Dems

Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years. A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship. We have a one party state. Nigel Farage leader of UKIP and Nick Griffin of the BNP both work for the EU.

The Freemasons:

The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 active freemasons.  Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are. See http://www.bilde4rberger.org/masons.html

http://www.bilderberg,org/masons.html

 to find out.

(It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF).

The Legal Profession:

Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.  British justice is now utterly corrupt. See our August issue. Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime. They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.

Common Purpose:

The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved. Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.

   Common Purpose

 

 

have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.  Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £167 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.

 

Among all the above are about 30,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 "useful idiots "implementing the EU’s corruption, and feeding off its gravy train. But there are 62 million of us; we need to shake off their disinformation, realise the truth, and kick them all out of office. To stop these 55,000 fraudsters, we need just 10,000 of you.

David Noakes.

http://eutruth,org.uk.

 

H.F.1828

*

 

May 'doesn't see upside from BREXIT

[AS WE SUSPECTED FROM THE BEGINNING. HOW COULD AN AVID SUPPORTER OF THE EU  HAVE ACTED OTHERWISE?]

DAILY MAIL

 

SATURDAY, MARCH 2,2019

Nick Timothy-THERESA MAY'S FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF HAS CLAIMED SHE REGARDS BREXIT

AS

'DAMAGE LIMITATION'.

Nick Timothy, who lost his job over the Tories' disastrous election campaign of 2017, said she and mainly her ministers' struggle to see any economic upside to BREXIT.

He told the BBC:

They see it as a damage limitation exercise.

If you see it in nthat way inevitably you're not going to be prepared to take the steps that would enable you to fully realise the economic opportunities of

LEAVING.

In a separate interview with Channel 4 News, Mr Timothy said the UK had made4 mistakes in Brexit negotiations, including

 by

allowing the EU to determine the sequence of talks.

 

He said the Government should have spent money earlier on preparing for a

NO DEAL BREXIT

and should have been more 'robust' in pushing areas of UK advantage. 'Some of it is to do with negotiating style,' he said.

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

SATURDAY, MARCH 2,2019

*  *  *

[AND WHAT WE BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION

IN APRIL 2018]

 
 

TREASON

 

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence'

EDMUND BURKE
comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

HOW CAN YOU TRUST THEM

ONLY A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP TO A TRUE BREXIT BELIEVER CAN ENSURE A CLEAN BREAK

FROM

HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY MUST BE IN OUR HANDS AS A FAMILY OF NATION STATES IN OUR OWN ISLAND HOME. IT IS A LEGACY FROM THE PAST THAT MUST BE HANDED INTACT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS-IT IS NOT OURS TO DISREGARD AS TRAITORS WITHIN IN OUR GOVERNMENT  AND CIVIL SERVICE DID SO IN 1970's . 

NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN HANDED THE LEADERSHIP TO WINSTON CHURCHILL in 1940. SO LIKEWISE THERESA MAY SHOULD HAND THE LEADERSHIP IN 2018 TO A TRUE BREXITEER TO ENSURE THAT

JUSTICE IS DONE!

SEPTEMBER 6,2018

H.F.1525/1

 

H.F.1800

 

*

 

DELAYING BREXIT

WOULD BE TO BETRAY THE REFERENDUM

By

Leo McKinstry-Daily Express columnist

Monday, March 4,2019

 

Sir Ivan Rogers, the highly respected former British ambassador to the EU, said in an interview last week that, though he had always felt Brexit might be difficult, even he had been surprised

"by the extent of the mess"

Sir Ivan is absolutely right to be critical of the Establishment, which has reduced the process of withdrawal

 to a paralysing shambles.

What should have been an inspirational moment of

NATIONAL LIBERATION

has been transformed by our politicians into a longwinded

saga of of frustration and despair

In place of

DETERMINATION

PATRIOTISM

 and

VISION

There has been only

INERTIA

INCOMPETENCE

AND

COWARDICE.

It is an extraordinary indictment of the political class that, with the official deadline for Britain's departure from the EU now less than a month away the process is still hopelessly bogged down in procedural wrangling.

[IT IS MORE THAN POSSIBLE THAT THIS SENARIO WAS PLANNED SHORTLY AFTER THE REFERENDUM RESULT. AS WE HAVE SHOWN IN THE ABOVE ARTICLE THE TWO CHIEF NEGOTIATORS KNEW EACH OTHER AND THEY WERE BOTH COMMITTED TO THE EU- HITLER'S PLAN OF GERMAN DOMINATION OF MUCH OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE. THE BIGGEST MISTAKE BELIEVING THAT A COMMITTED REMAINER COULD BE TRUE TO HER WORD

 OF

BREXIT

MEANS

BREXIT]

It is an extraordinary indictment of the political class that with the official deadline for Britain's departure from the EU now less than a month away, the process is still hopelessly bogged down to procedural wrangling.

*

 

[OUR COMMENT]

[We have always advocated that MPs should only serve  one term in PARLIAMENT in order that no MP over time can only consider their own agenda and not of that of an accustomed

FREE PEOPLE

and

 A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

The accumulated FREEDOM of PERSON and NATION  is in TRUST for FUTURE GENERATIONS. The problem we have is that members of our hallowed HOUSE of WESTMINSTER are by custom the SERVANTS of the PEOPLE but as we have seen over the past 47 years they have become our MASTERS. They are so arrogant that they even now consider they OWN OUR BODIES. We should tell them to go to HELL!]

*

All energy has been drained from our exit strategy, and there is a genuine risk that the vacillation could soon grow even worse. Within the next 10 days it is possible-even likely-that MPS could vote for an indefinite delay in BREXIT by an extension in Article 50, the legal instrument that ends our

 EU MEMBERSHIP.

ANY substantial delay in

BREXIT

would be a clear

 BETRAYAL

of the

REFERENDUM RESULT.

 

It is now almost three years since

17.4 million voted for BRITAIN to LEAVE the EU,

by far the biggest expression of support through the ballot box for any cause  in the

HISTORY OF OUR DEMOCRACY

The people have waited long enough for this decision to be implemented. The people have waited long enough for this decisin to be implemented. The overwhelming mood of the public is for the politicians to

" GET ON WITH IT"

But Brexit is still trapped in a political quagmire and there is little sign of an imminent resolution in this chaos. On the contrary, impending votes in the Commons provide yet more scope for irresponsibility. By Tuesday, March 12, MPs must make a decision on whether or not to approve the Prime Minister's

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT.

Optimistic noises are emerging from Downing Street, but that could be wishful thinking.

After all, Mrs May's deal was thrown out last month by a margin of 230 votes, the

BIGGEST GOVERNMENT  DEFEAT IN HISTORY .

 SINCE then little progress has been made in talks with the typically intransigent EU over amending the Irish backstop, loathed by the Brexiteers because it could trap Britain under permanent Brussels control. Negotiations are proving

"extraordinary difficult",

 the Attorney General Geoffrey Cox, the minister charged with achieving compromise.

If Mrs May's Agreement is again defeated, then the Cabinet -having been subjected in ferocious pressure by Remainer ministers, including open blackmail through threats of resignation -has accepted that MPs will be able to hold votes on two further proposals:

One to reject a NO DEAL, the other to extend Article 50. Both are likely to pass, but suchy movres will be a

DISASTER

FOR OUR NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 INDEED any delay in Brexit could destroy our chances of leaving the EU altogether, while the inability to leave without a deal gives the EU the upper hand.

Last week the Tory MP George Eustice resigned as Agricultural Minister in fury sat the Governments retreat, warning that these developments could culminate

 " in the EU dictating the terms of the extension requested  and the final humiliation of our country."

A Commons vote in favour of a delay would leave Britain in its weakest position since the negotiations began.  We would have to adopt the stance of a

DESPERATE SUPPLICANT .

Brussels has already indicated that any delay would have to be a minimum of

21 MONTHS.

Furthermore, without a clear objective, a delay would be an act of destructive procrastination.

Remainers continually bleat about the dangers of

"UNCERTAINTY"

over

BREXIT

but, by refusing to embrace the

REFERENDUM OUTCOME

they are fuelling the problem. In their cynical mindset, agitation for a

DELAY

will create a vast political vacuum, which  will be filled with demands for another vote or straightforward reversal of the

2016 RESULT.

In practice, a delay will be the beginning of the end for

BREXIT,

 which is precisely why the Remainers support this proposition.

All momentum would disappear from the

LEAVE CAUSE.

If Britain cannot break free now how could we do so in future?

THE

MOMENT OF FREEDOM

WILL HAVE PASSED.

 deadline of March 29 was meant to be one of the Government's red lines. Enough concessions have been made already. Any further prevarication would be intolerable.

FULL ARTICLE

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

Monday, March 4,2019

 

H.F.1824

*

 

 

CAN COX

BE OUR

IRON DUKE

OF

BREXIT

*

 Andrew Pierce reporting

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

 

 

 

News for DAILY MAIL-CAN COX BE OUR IRON DUKE OF BREXIT?

AS a provocative gesture it could hardly have been more mischievous. Geoffrey Cox, the key Cabinet figure trying to secure

 BREXIT

posted online an image of a portrait of the

DUKE of WELLINGTON

whose finest hour was his victory over Napoleon at the

BATTLE of WATERLOO

just 40 miles from

 BRUSSELS.

As he engages in combat in the same city with a modern-day Frenchman, the European Union's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier, the British Government's Attorney General clearly hopes that

HE TOO WILL PREVAIL.

Accompanying his Wellinton tweet, Mr Cox gave a simple caption: The Iron Duke, By invoking the

SPIRIT

of one of Britain's greatest heroes and taunting the 'enemy', Mr Cox threw down the gauntlet.

Until his appointment as Attorney General last summer, the lawyer was best known as the MP with the biggest earnings from outside Parliament.

His admirers cross the political spectrum. Phillip Sands QC, Professor of Law at University College, London, describes him as

 'thoroughly independent and fearless in the best traditions of the

ENGLISH BAR.'

Andrew Mitchell MP the former International Development Secretary is another fan:

'He looks and sounds like a proper, old fashioned Attorney General.

He has real presence and authority. Everyone knows he will give his advice without

FEAR or FAVOUR

unlike some of his predecessors who served up what the Prime Minister wanted to hear.

Yet before his surprise promotion to Cabinet, Cox divided his time between his job as a Devon MP and work as a QC. In 2014, he earned £821,000 at the Bar. Two years later nhe apologised to the Commons for claiming parliamentary expenses of 49p for a bottle of milk, £2 worth of tea bags and £4.99 for weedkiller for space in front of the constituency office'-all claims that were rejected.

A profile on the Conservative Home website revealed he often took his juniors to the Savoy for tea, 'where they could digest the day's play as well as the cakes'. He has done the same for MPs who want to explore the intricacies of

BREXIT.

His clients have included the Turkish government, journalists from THE SUN accused of paying public for stories, a Liverpool FC footballer, the controversal property tycoon Nicholas Van Hoogstraten and a British Olypian'in proceedings for drug abuse.'

He also had a spell working in Mauritius as pupil master to the country's prime minister.

Cox was annoyed when he was named among 229 investors in Phoenix Film in 2014 which offered tax breaks for investing in Hollywood movies. While the HMRC regarded it as a tax avoidance scheme, Cox insisted he had instructed his financial advisers that he did not wish to be involved in 'aggressive tax avoidance.

His political break-through came when ultra-Brexiteers Boris Johnson and David Davis quit the Cabinet and he was appointed as part of the ministerial reshuffle. On his Commons debut, he captivated MPs. His voice was described as being'as deep as a tuba's lament' and also likened to Mufasa, the character in The Lion King.

And at last autumn's Tory party conference, he was chosen as Mrs May's warm up act. In a stirring conclusion, he said

Britain would come to new life after

BREXIT

and quoted the poet John Milton's

Areopagitica

'Methinks I see in my mind a noble and puissant nation rousing herself like a strong man from sleep, and shaking her invincible locks;

Methinks I see her as an eagle muing her mighty youth, and kindling her undazl'd eyes at the full midday beam'.

Looking older than his 58 years, this son of a soldier has such an impressive bearing that Commons Speaker John Bercow mistakenly once announced him as

'Sir' Geoffrey

Mr Cox replied:' I am extremely obliged to you for promoting me., Mr Speaker. Perhaps I can take that as a hint to the Prime Minister.'

A rotund figure, he claims his recreations include swimming and enjoying rural life

If his brickmanship succeeds over Brexit negotiations in Brussels, he will have earned all the credit due.

If he fails, the PM will have a convenient scapegoat.

Geoffrey Cox, who relishes the cut and thrust of Cabinet life was once asked what was his greatest achievement. He modestly replied: 'Thirty-five years of marriage - well, its really my wife's achievement, not mine.

If he helps get Mrs May's Brexit deal over the line it will certainly be his achievement-and one to match that of the Iron Duke on a Belgian battlefield 204 years ago.

*  *  *

[In the film Wimslow Boy  with actor ROBERT DONATE who gave an impressive legal performance before the HOUSE OF COMMONS defending a Naval cadet accused of theft by the Admiralty,and the main theme was:

'Let Right be Done!

 

[Mr Geoffrey COX will become a man of  English history if he can retrieve the honour of our nation state - given away by traitors in 1972 by lies and deceit ,and be able to show the English people, wherever they are, that they have rejoined their ancient historic path ,lost to them so many decades ago.]

 'Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.'

Lord Acton

*

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

MARCH 5,2019

 

H.F.1827

*

 

SUNDAY EXPRESS

 

 

Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies MP
 

TORY MP

FOR SHIPLEY

ISN'T the House of Commons there to represent the people of the United Kingdom? It might seem a strange question but are MPs actually rtepresenting people on key issues?

Many MPs now seem to advocate representing the public on a politically correct tick box. Not a day goes by without someone mentioning the need to

 "represent/reflect the communities we serve"

Back in the real world, in terms of truly representing the people (rather than obsessing about someone's gender or skin colour) how are you feeling?

 Absolutely abysmally I'd say.

The most head-grabbing current example is Parliament's continuing mission to try to

frustate

BREXIT

We know the House of Commons is out of touch on

[HITLER'S]

EU.

Around 75 per cent of MPs voted for or campaigned for

REMAINING IN THE EU.

[A REMAINER PARLIAMENT]

However the [June 23-2016] result was that people voted to

LEAVE

and yet still many MPs seem to think they can cast aside public opinion like an old sweet rapping and carry on as they were before the public [their masters] came up with an answer

THEY DID NOT LIKE.

['THE BASTARDS'

AS  DAILY MAIL'S QUENTIN LETTS HAS RIGHTLY CALLED THEM. ]

We knew the EU would try to do that but shouldn't we expect better from our own MPS?

After all, they were telling voters this was a once in a lifetime chance to record

THEIR OPINION .

This does not sit comfortably with many MPs spending every waking hour

since

TRYING TO DISHONOUR THE RESULT

especially when most MPs elected since the referendum stood on a manifesto

 with a clear commitment to implement

BREXIT

YOU do not have to look far for another example of the chasm between

PARLIAMENT  and PEOPLE

The public's view on law and order compared to the Government's are chalk and cheese more police and want them on the streets

They want tougher action on criminals and tougher sentences for most crimes.

In a poll a few years ago asking views on a sentencing escalator (repeat offenders given increasing harsh sentences for committing the same crime again)

90 per cent of the public were in favour.

So, are we doing that?

NO

Not only are we not, this government is now touting the idea that there should be a presumption against short sentences-possibly six months or fewer. You might have thought, "Great, we shall now get longer sentences-Alas, no, Short sentences will be replaced by

NO SENTENCES AT ALL

It is a ludicrous suggestion yet, with all eyes on

BREXIT

It is genuinely being pursued by the

[SO-CALLED]

Ministry of Justice.

Never mind the public, just ask police officers what they think, then brace yourself...

IT IS HARD TO GET SENT TO PRISON AS IT IS: YOU EITHER HAVE TO COMMIT A REALLY SERIOUS CRIME OR OFFEND SOMANY TIMES THAT THERE'S NO OTHER OPTION. SOMEONE MANAGED TO BE CONVICTED OF

62 SHOPLIFTING OFFENCES

BEFORE FINALLY BEING SENT TO

 JAIL.

OFFENDERS SENTENCED TO SIX MONTHS OR FEWER LAST YEAR HAD RACKED UP AN AVERAGE OF

55 previous offences each.

THEY HAD also received an average of five community orders, which clearly didn't work.

Around 2000 knife offenders received six months or fewer. In a knife crime epidemic, who in their right minds would not want to see these offenders in prison. At least, while they are serving their sentences

THEY ARE NOT CONTINUING OFFENDING.

THEN, there's overseas aid. We spend more on that than on policing and double what we spend on our

[SO-CALLED]

JUSTICE BUDGET

This money is fixeds, ring-fenced and

WILL ONLY INCREASE

People do not generally share politicians' desire to waste money as if it is going out of fashion to make themselves feel better.

To add insult to injury, people then hear of billions spent on ridiculous projects or syphoned off by corrupt officials. This happens in a department whose mission is to spend as much as possible so there can be a luvvie hug when we hit a random target. As with the overseas aid cult, there's the religion of

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which has a huge following in Parliament.

Many MPs are obsessed with tick boxes' so-called

POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION

They refuse to speak the truth for fear of upsetting minority groups and twist the facts to suit the agenda.

Heaven help anyone who challenges this cosy politically-correct concensus, I have tried.

Yet most people are fed up with political correctness. Hardly anyone identifies as a feminist. They just want men and women to be treated fairly and equally. But Parliament makes our laws and so politically correct tentacles spread.

These are key issues where Parliament is not representing our vies and I haven't even started on HS2. And we know manyMPS nthink of voters who do not share their Left-wing or Remain views.

Being out of sync with the

PUBLIC

should be of grave concern. For a democracy to work, people have to feel that thoswe in the Commons

SPEAK FOR THEM.

This isn't happening and MPs should fear the backlash that will come if this continues.

*  *  *

[Need we look elsewhere for the great problems we are experiencing at the present time to extract our once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

FROM

HITLER'S PLAN

FOR

GERMANY TO DOMINATE

EUROPE

IN THE

PEACE]

 

*

THE PUBLIC

THEY WANT MORE POLICE AND WANT THEM ON THE STREETS.

PREVIOUS PRIME MINISTERS AND HOME SECRETARIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CARNAGE ON THE STREETS TO DAY IN 2019.

 

[The EDP for decades has many bulletins showing how many important  public issues have and are still being ignored by successive governments. As the excellent article above has shown it is the dim-witted members of the House of Commons who have been there too long that has created this Mad Parliament feature. AS in Cromwell's Day the way to deal with the trash is to kick them out of Parliament. WE have advocated for decades that MPS should only SERVE THEIR COUNTRY for a TERM-at present 5 years. At present many MPs look on the job as for life which reflects in their arrogance and treasonable behaviour. The change will enable those who wish give up 5 years TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY instead of THEMSELVES  from across our society, to do so.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

SUNDAY EXPRESS

-Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies  MP
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

MARCH 10,2019

*  *  *

[A REMINDER! FROM THE PAST]

OF A COUNTRY RIDDLED WITH TREASON]

The EU’s control structure in Britain

The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.  An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside. This is not an exhaustive list.

The Bilderbergers – Europe wide

A society of 140 top politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state:  96%. All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.  This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader. They threw Margaret Thatcher out and replaced her with a compliant Bilderberger, John Major. Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), are Bilderbergers and work for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent. That is why your vote makes no difference.

Britain is the target

Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target. They know from our long history and two world wars the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. 

   For that reason the EU’s British sympathisers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.

    That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.

The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department

Controls development of the EU. Set up by Adolf Hitler in 1942, who created the EU as the EEC in 1940.  Recruits British politicians including

EDWARD HEATH

 

Geoffrey Rippon and Roy Jenkins

, and major British newspapers for the EU.  Some of our top politicians are DVD assets now (possibly Milliband, Brown, Blair), we may not know who until their deaths.

The Conservative Party

The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.  The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.   

    The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he lied). They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.

Labour and the Lib Dems

Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years. A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship. We have a one party state. Nigel Farage leader of UKIP and Nick Griffin of the BNP both work for the EU.

The Freemasons:

The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 active freemasons.  Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are. See http://www.bilde4rberger.org/masons.html

http://www.bilderberg,org/masons.html

 to find out.

(It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF).

The Legal Profession:

Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.  British justice is now utterly corrupt. See our August issue. Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime. They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.

Common Purpose:

The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved. Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.

   Common Purpose

 

 

have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.  Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £167 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.

 

Among all the above are about 30,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 "useful idiots "implementing the EU’s corruption, and feeding off its gravy train. But there are 62 million of us; we need to shake off their disinformation, realise the truth, and kick them all out of office. To stop these 55,000 fraudsters, we need just 10,000 of you.

David Noakes.

http://eutruth,org.uk.

 

H.F.1828

*

 

TRUMP TRADE OFFER

 

Boosts

Brexiteers

Donald Trump promised US COMMERCE with Britain

Will increase 'very substantially' after a post-Brexit deal to preserve

£12 BILLION of trade

From TOM LEONARD in NEW York

Daily Mail - Trump trade offer boosts Brexiteers - Mail e-paper

 

FEBRUARY 16, 2019

Speaking at thE WHITE HOUSE, the president made clear he was happy with the deal and said the

'very good trading relationship' between the two countries had been 'strenghened further.'.

His comments will hearten pro-Brexit supporters who have argued that leaving the European Union will enable Britain to strike lucrative

FREE TRADE DEALS

Across the globe.

Mr Trump had previously critisised Theresa May's handling of

BREXIT

warning her moves to negotiate a softer deal with the EU acould 'kill' any new deal with the US.

The new mutual recognition agreement replicates the current deal between the EU and US on ntechnical standards for exported goods.

sMr Trump made the comments in passing as he rattled through his administration's foreign policy successes.

'With the UK, we're continuing our trade and we're actually going to be increasing it very substantially as time goes by,' he said.

International Trade Secretary Liam Fox leapt on the remarks, saying: President TRump's statement was clear-the UK and the USA share a

SPECIAL TRADE RELATIONSHIP

and there is real ambition on both sides of the Atlantic to enhance this after we

LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION.

[THOSE WHO TALK OF A SOFT OPTION ARE SUPPORTING ADOLF HITLER'S PLAN FOR A GERMAN DICTATORSHIP OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE.

THROUGHOUT HISTORY OF MANKIND FREEDOM OF PERSON AND COUNTRY HAS OFTEN RESULTED IN THE OLD ADAGE!

'WITHOUT PAIN-THERE IS NO GAIN!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

* 

FEBRUARY 16, 2019

 

H.F.1801

*

AS WE ARE NEARING

 OUR

INDEPENDENCE DAY

 DO NOT RETREAT YOUR HOUR OF

LIBERTY

 IS

AT HAND!.

FEBRUARY 15,2019
 

A CALL TO ARMS.

The Leave camp need to be ready to

DEFEND

 their

VICTORY

to  live under

 

"The Rights and

Liberties"

of

ENGLISHMEN.

WE HAVE NO WISH TO SEE A REOCCURRENCE  OF THE BLOODY REVOLUTION  in 1642 IN EDGE HILL-WARWICKSHIRE

TO RETAIN

THE

Rights and Liberties of Englishmen'

 AND SUBSEQUENT  BATTLES AROUND THE COUNTRY.

THE REASON FOR A CALL TO ARMS IS BECAUSE MILLIONS OF THE FRIENDS OF FRAU MERKEL WILL NOT ACCEPT THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND

AND WILL USE ALMOST ANY MEANS TO ENSLAVE THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS FOR EVER IN THE NOW INTENDED TRI-NATION SUPER-STATE OF GERMANY-FRANCE AND ITALY.

THE SHEER ARROGANCE OF THE SPONSORS OF HITLER'S WAR-TIME PLANNED SUPER-STATE IS NOW A REALITY.

THE GREATER NUMBER STILL SUPPORTING THE  BEAST OF BRUSSELS

-BRAIN-WASHED-MIND-BENDING PROPAGANDA-BETRAYERS OF THEIR SACRED INHERITANCE OF

MAGNA CARTA

 FOUGHT FOR FOR OVER 800 YEARS -SO SOUGHT FOR  AND PROTECTED IN ALMOST HALF THE WORLD.

IF IT HAS TO BE THEN WE MUST FIGHT AS WE ARE IN THE RIGHT AND CANNOT ACCEPT ANY COMPROMISE TO THAT OF THE RETURN OF OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STARE.

TO SHOW THAT WE ARE READY THERE NEEDS TO BE RALLIES AROUND THE COUNTRY IN THOSE CROMWELLIAN BATTLE FIELDS OF THE

ENGLISH CIVIL WAR

IT IS AGAIN THE ROUNDHEADS AGAINST THE CAVALIERS

WILL YOU DO IT?

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

[BY A COINCIDENCE WE ONLY REALISED THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DAY AFTER WE HAD COMPLETED OUR WORK.

JULY 4-

AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE DAY

 

WHEN WILL WE CELIBRATE OUR INDEPENDENCE DAY?]

H. F. 824 FREEDOM NOW.

H.F.1800

*

 

DELAYING BREXIT

WOULD BE TO BETRAY THE REFERENDUM

By

Leo McKinstry-Daily Express columnist

Monday, March 4,2019

 

Sir Ivan Rogers, the highly respected former British ambassador to the EU, said in an interview last week that, though he had always felt Brexit might be difficult, even he had been surprised

"by the extent of the mess"

Sir Ivan is absolutely right to be critical of the Establishment, which has reduced the process of withdrawal

 to a paralysing shambles.

What should have been an inspirational moment of

NATIONAL LIBERATION

has been transformed by our politicians into a longwinded

saga of of frustration and despair

In place of

DETERMINATION

PATRIOTISM

 and

VISION

There has been only

INERTIA

INCOMPETANCE

AND

COWARDNESS.

It is an extraordinary indictment of the political class that, with the official deadline for Britain's departure from the EU now less than a month away the process is still hopelessly bogged down in ptrocedural wrangling.

[IT IS MORE THAN POSSIBLE THAT THIS SENARIO WAS PLANNED SHORTLY AFTER THE REFERENDUM RESULT. AS WE HAVE SHOWN IN THE ABOVE ARTICLE THE TWO CHIEF NEGOTIATORS KNEW EACH OTHER AND THEY WERE BOTH COMMITTED TO THE EU- HITLER'S PLAN OF GERMAN DOMINATION OF MUCH OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE. THE BIGGEST MISTAKE BELIEVING THAT A COMMITTED REMAINER COULD BE TRUE TO HER WORD

 OF

BREXIT

MEANS

BREXIT]

It is an extraordinary indictment of the political class that with the official deadline for Britain's departure from the EU now less than a month away, the process is still hopelessly bogged down to proceedural wranging.

*

 

[OUR COMMENT]

[We have always advocated that MPs should only serve  one term in PARLIAMENT in order that no MP over time can only consider their own agenda and not of that of an accustomed

FREE PEOPLE and A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

The accumulated FREEDOM of PERSON and NATION  is in TRUST for FUTURE GENERATIONS. The problem we have is that members of our hallowed HOUSE of WESTMINSTER are by custom the SERVANTS of the PEOPLE but as we have seen over the past 47 years they have become our MASTERS. They are so arrogant that they even now consider they OWN OUR BODIES. We should tell them to go to

 HELL!

*

All energy has been drained from our exit strategy, and there is a genuine risk that the vacillation could soon grow even worse. Within the next 10 days it is possible-even likely-that MPS could vote for an indefinite delay in BREXIT by an extension in Article 50, the legal instrument that ends our

 EU MEMBERSHIP...

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

Monday, March 4,2019

 

H.F.1824

*

st.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 
MAR-

17

 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-

18

 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-

18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

*
LITTLEJOHN

 

 As Marx said, history does have the ... A Very British Coup revolved around a conspiracy by the military, the media, big business and M15...

 

 

So this is what a very British coup looks like.

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

SOME of you will recall the novel

A Very British Coup,

subsequently made into an award-winning television series on Channel 4.

It was written by Labour MP Chris Mullin, published in 1982, and revolved around a conspiracy by the

MILITARY-THE MEDIA-BIG BUSINESS-M15

to bring down a Left-wing government.

At the time, the plot was entirely credible, since Britain was riven by strikes and revolution was in the air. I read the book as a young labour and industrial correspondent, and it made sense to me.

 The Bennites were in the ascendancy, Margaret Thatcher was horribly unpopular and it looked as if the wizened Hampstead Leftie Michael Foot-Worzel Gummidge, as Private Eye dubbed him-would be our next Prime Minister.

Mullin's assumptions were based  on hard fact. In the Seventies there had been well-founded reports about the Establishment plot to depose Labour's Harold Wilson.

In some quarters, there were even rumblings of a military coup.

A couple of years ago, when the un reconstructed Bennite Jeremy Corbyn became leader, Mullen talked about writing a sequel. He imagined the Funny  People orchestrating a putsch to thwart a democratically elected Corbyn government.

Trouble is, history has a habit of not working out as you expect. Although, as Marx said, history does have the capacity to repeat itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. That's where we are right now. Except tragedy and farce are running in tandem.

WE are in the middle of

A VERY BRITISH COUP

but not as Mullin predicted. What we're seeing is an elaborate, well-financed and coordinated plot to overturn as extreme Left-wing Prime Minister

BUT

the democratically expressed will of the British people.

It's being mounted by the Government of the day, aided and abetted by Big Business and the Civil Service.

[A repeat of 1970's-again by a supposed Conservative Government.]

 

THIS is A  Very BRITISH Coup, only written by Lewis Carroll not Chris Mullin. In our new Looking Glass World, words mean-as Humpty Dumpty declared-whatever they want them to mean.

Thus the dwindling band of MPs sticking uo for the

17.4 MILLION who voted

LEAVE

are condemned as plotters and rebels

Those, including Theresa May, who are doing everything in their power to

PREVENT

BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU

and becoming once again a

PROUD SOVEREIGN NATION

are hailed absurdedly as true patriots

As I've said often enough, just because your paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

About the only thing upon which I've ever agreed with Ken Livingstone - apart from cheap Tube fares - was when he wrote a book called

If Voting Changed Anything They'd Abolish it. The Establishment seems hell-bent on proving him

Right over Brexit .

[The EDP has over decades seen much evidence of this very fact and though continually bringing evidence to the surface nobody appears to be interested whether it is lack of Bobbies -on-the beat - Health Service in crisis-Pot-holes-closed Police Stations...Britons on worst State Pensions in the Europe-even Portugal is marginally more. And a bloated -wasteful and grotesque so-called FOREIGN AID which even some regimes as recipients have requested to be stopped .

I told  you the day after the referendum that the fix was already in . Now they're on the final furlongs

We're being informed, in no uncertain fashion that

OUR VOTES ARE WORTHLESS

that they don't count.

WE'RE TOO IGNORANT, TOO UNEDUCATED, TOO RACIST

To be taken seriously.

Politicians who try to square the circle are vilified.

One minute Dominic Raab, who attempted to make a go of being Brexit Secretary, is a principled pragmatic operator of the highest praise.

The next, when he is forced to resign because Mother Theresa has deliberately undermined his position and then lied about it, he's dismissed as a disloyal traitor. And If I hear anyone else demanding a second

'People's Vote'

I'll scream.

All they want to do is reverse the referendum result or give us three options so they can split the

LEAVE VOTE

To be honest, I can't take much more of this patronising guff. The Beeb's idea of discerning commentators these days seems to extend no further than 'Baroness' Shameless Chuckabutty, Potty Toynbee and Mad Alastair Campbell, the author of the dodgy dossier which took into an

ILLEGAL WAR IN IRAQ.

 

As I believe I may have observed before. Campbell is the only bloke I know with a certificate to prove he's sane.

And don't get me started on the CBI which throughout my career has been wrong about everything from joining the euro to the Thatcher reforms. The CBI speaks only for monopolistic, multinational megacorps, not the small-to-medium businesses which are the backbone of our economy and always get the rough end  of the pineapple from Brussels - even though they don't sell so much as a brass washer outside British borders.

Twenty-five-odd years ago, covering a CBI conference in Glasgow, I watched the chairman of Dunlop taking the stage wearing a kilt and waving a Union Jack, as part of an I'm Backing Britain campaign. The following week he sold the company to the Japanese.

These are the same people bnow claiming to have British interests at the heart of their determination to

KEEP US SHACKLED TO THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC EU

The final straw came when the arrogant Amber Rudd was restored to Government over the weekend and immediately demanded loyalty and unity around Mrs May's 'deal'.  Her commitment to 'loyalty' hasn't stopped her trashing Cabinet colleagues in the past.

This fanatically pro-EU women who oozes an inter-galactic sense of  entitledment from every pore, is the sister of the PR spiv Roland Rudd, who is paid a small fortune to run

PROJECT FEAR

on behalf of his well-healed clients.

Just imagine if one of Boris's siblings was cashing in on

BREXIT.

The calls from Remainers for the police to investigate would be deafening. By Sunday, I'd had enough and reached the point where I came over all Tom Robinson.

I've given up reading the papers,

I've given up watching TV.

 

LOOK, I repeat, for those of you who missed it the first time round, even tungsten-tipped hard Brexiteers like me accept there will have to be some concessions if we're going to escape from the EU straitjacket.

And I do think the prospect of a Marxist Corbynista government is too horrible to contemplate.

But I also believe its 1992 all over again. This is Mother Theresa's

BLACK WEDNESDAY

MOMENT

WHATEVER HAPPENS NEXT

THE TORIES

ARE SHOT TO PIECES.

All trust and confidence in them has drained away and we're looking at a Labour government by default whenever the next election is called

Most of the 17.4 million who believe they have been betrayed will simply stay at home, or drift back to Labour. Democracy will be the ultimate casualty of this shabby debacle.

The pathetic defeatest dog's breakfast of an agreement

 which Mother Theresa is trying to force down our throats isn't worthy of the description 'deal'.

It is a monstrous capitulation and will be etched on her political gravestone, even if she does manage to get it, or a version thereof, through Parliament.

Where do we go from here?

I haven't a clue.

But at least we now know exactly

what a

Very British Coup

LOOKS LIKE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So this is what a very British coup looks like

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 20,2018

H.F.1747

*

 

We Germans have insulted Britain. How can we have forgotten the huge debt we owe you.

 

News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

As MARCH 29 looms closer, here in Germany, rabid anti-British sentiment is part of the daily discourse.

The chattering classes-politicians and pundits alike-are urging our Angela Merkel, to harden her line towards the United Kingdom after suggestions that she was prepared to throw Theresa May a lifeline. Indeed last week Annegret Kramp -Karrenbauer, Merkel's successor -in-waiting calls for Britain to scrap Brexit completely. Germans are far from alone in this attitude. In the wake of the momentous Commons defeat for your Prime Minister's Brexit strategy, the European Commission twisted the thumbscrews still further. have been unshakable

Michel Barnier, the EU's Brexit negotiator, suggested it was time for the EU to abandon its 'red lines' over ending freedom of movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

 Yet these issues have been unshakable stipulations for the British since the beginning of talks. To casually propose dumping them in this way is insulting to your country.

 Regret

The French president, Emmanuel Macron, was, regrettably, similarly dismissive when he said that

 Brexit

was a

BRITISH PROBLEM

and one it would have to solve on its own. Such blinkered and sour responses are, in my view, wrong-headed. They ignore the great debt that Germany, and the whole Continent, owes our friends across the Channel.

However much we in Europe regret your decision  to leave our Community, we must always remember that, throughout your history, independence and sovereignty have been

PARAMOUNT.

Germany in particular should tread lightly when it comes to dealing with

YOUR PROUD NATION.

It was Great Britain that first stood up to Hitler in 1939. And it was Britain that opened its doors to the thousands of Jew-doors to the thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing certain death during the Holocaust.

Put simply, there would be no free Europe without you and the bloody sacrifice you made to rescue the Continent. This plain fact has not always been a popular one, of course. The truth is that there has been a long tradition of policies aimed at excluding the British Isles from Europe, most notably those of French president Charles De Gaulle.

After the war, inspired by dreams of the medieval empire that stretched across  the Continent under Charlemagne, De Gaulle poured his energy into setting up the European economic Community -the forerunner of the EU.

But when Britain enquired about membership in the early Sixties, his answer was an emphatic 'Non' Thanks to De Gaulle's opposition, it took more than a decade for the UK to be accepted. And the driving force for unity for welcoming British membership with open arms was the German chancellor of the Sixties, Konrad Adenauer.

For that, ultimately, we can thank the QUEEN

[TREASON]

This considerable and controversial article appears at a crucial moment in our long island history to recover our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE-will be completed shortly-in the meantime for the complete work click ]

Here!

 

*  *  *

[We were against entry to

Hitler's plan for Europe

in 1972 and again in 1975.]

[WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

THE ENEMY IS EVERY WHERE]

[ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

 

H.F.1784

*

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE
MAY-16 victory

JUN-16

REFERENDUM

 JUL-16 AUG-16 SEP-16 OCT-16 NOV-16 DEC-16 JAN - 17 FEB-17
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 
BULLETINS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

 

Via Benjamin Fulford, 3-10-19… “Top-level discussion between CIA and MI6 about the tip-top of Western power and what’s going on behind the scenes”

Posted on 2019/03/11 by
I

I was checking Benjamin’s website, and this showed up. I found it pretty fascinating, and felt drawn to post it. I believe the answers are from the MI6 person (British Intelligence) and the questions are from the CIA person. The parts about Bitcoin and blockchain may be related to the Quantum Financial System many have been talking about.

This is not the weekly report.

“[Q: explain the “World Future Planning Agency.”] A proposed new economic planning agency in peacetime as the Khazarian Mafia control matrix rapidly collapses. Similar to the Marshall Plan, but more like the Asian Economic Planning Agencies.

“[Q: Do you believe that you were recruited to solve the global currency and financial crisis whereabouts this financial reset is necessary?] Yes, I own the patents for the new quantum financial systems and single digital world currency unit which resolve the difficulties in the architecture of legacy systems.

“The new Quantum Financial System is designed in such a manner there could no repeat of the poor conduct by the international financial services industry. It is highly forensic in order to discourage bad behaviour… Blockchain is a brand name of a technology called Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT). It is not a currency; it is the technology embedded inside electronic currencies.

“[Q: comment on this statement: “The distributed ledger technology ends the Rothschild fiat monetary system and the dreaded New World Order.”] It has ended both already.

“Karen Hudes is a very disruptive person who has caused a great deal of damage to international diplomatic relations. Much of her work is confusing, to be polite.

“[Q: comment on this statement: N. Keenan is the trustee for the gold in Indonesia.] We have reason to believe Neil Keenan was assassinated. This has been verified by British military counterintelligence.

“[Q: Do you really think this will work out peacefully, knowing what you know?] The prediction is a peaceful transition, but the opposition may require limited military intervention around the world to break up the remaining obstacles.”

————————————————————-

 

H.F.1814

*
 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM: MARCH 16 -2012

A LESSON OF HISTORY

 

 ENGLAND

 

'

'It is because England is so great, and our love for our country is so deep and so just, that we can not only afford to dwell upon the darker spots of our history, but we absolutely require them, lest our love and admiration should become idolatrous;  it is because we are too apt to compare foreign nations with ourselves unfavourably that it is absolutely good for us to contemplate what they have suffered unjustly or done unworthily'  [P174]

 

Thomas Arnold, D. D., Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford and Head Master of Rugby School(1795-+1842)

 
 

 

 ENGLAND

 

OUR ISLAND HOME

 

 PART 2

 

...In our own island we see this most clearly: our history clearly begins with the coming over of the Saxons, the Britons and Romans had lived in our country, but they are not our fathers; we are connected with them as men indeed, but nationally speaking, the history of  Caesar's  invasion has no more to do with us, than the natural history of the animals which then inhabited our forests.   We ,this great English nation, whose race and language are now overrunning the earth [1843] from one end to the other,- we were born when the white horse of the Saxons had established his dominion from the Tweed to the Tamar.   So far we can trace our blood, our language, the name and actual divisions of our country, the beginnings of some of their institutions.   So far our national identity extends, so far history is modern, for it treats of a life which was then, and is not yet extinguished.

... By the great elements of nationality, I mean, race, language, institutions, and religion: and it will be seen that throughout Europe all these four may be traced up, if not actually in every case to the fall of the western empire, yet to the dark period which followed the fall, while in no case are all the four to be found united before it.   Otherwise, if we allow the two first of these [race and language] elements without the third and fourth [institutions and religion] to constitute national identity, especially when combined with sameness of places, we must say the the northern countries of Europe have no ancient history, inasmuch as they have been inhabited from the earliest times by the same race speaking what is radically the same language [GERMAN].   But it is better not to admit national identity, till the two elements of institutions and religion, or at any rate one of them, be added to those of blood and language .   At all events it cannot be doubted, that as soon as the four  are united, the national personality becomes complete...'

 

Is the government to impose its laws upon the people?   We speak of the government as distinct from the people, without thereby implying that it is in opposition to the people.   In a corrupt state the government and people are wholly at variance; in a perfect state they would be wholly one; in ordinary states they are one more or less imperfectly.    We need not be afraid to say, that in a perfect state the law of the government would be the law of the people, the law of their choice, the expression of  their mind.   In less perfect states the law of the government ids more or less the law of the people, suiting them in the main if not entirely.   If it be wholly or in great part unwelcome to them, something in the state is greatly wrong [ as has been the case since 1997 with so-called NEW LABOUR and the latter MIXED BUNCH of which we have no idea what they really stand for -THEY are ALL the SAME!.]   ;and although I believe that there are cases where a dictatorship is a good, and where good laws may rightfully be  imposed on a barbarian and unwilling people; yet, as  as the rule, there can be no doubt that such a state of things is tyranny.   When I speak therefore of the government, I am speaking of it as expressing the mind and will of the nation; and though a government may not impose its own law, whether human or divine, upon an adverse people; yet a nation, acting through its government, may certainly choose for itself such a law as it deems most for the good.

 

 

And therefore when it has been said that " these islands do not belong to the king and parliament in the same manner as the house or land of any individual belongs to the owner," and that therefore a government may not settle the religious law of a  country as the master of a family may settle the religious practices of his household; this is true only if we consider the king and parliament as not speaking the voice of the nation, but their own opposed to that of the nation.   For the right of a nation over its territory must be at least as absolute as that of any individual over his own house and land; and it surely is not an absurdity to suppose that the voice of government can ever be the voice of the nation:  although they unhappily too often differ, yet surely they may conceivably, and very often do in practice, completely agree...

 

... Wherever there is centralization, there is a danger of the parts of the body being too much crippled in their individual action; and yet centralization is essential to their healthy activity no less than to the perfection of the body.  But if men run away with the mistaken notion that liberty of conscience is threatened only by a state religion, and not at all by a church religion, the danger is that they will abandon religion altogether to what they call the church, that is, to the power of society far worse governed than most states, and likely to lay far heavier burdens on individual conscience, because the spirit dominant init is narrower and more intolerant.

 

[P46]  No doubt all societies, whether they are called states or churches, are bound to avoid tempting the conscience of individuals by overstating the terms of citizenship or communion.    And it is desirable, as I said before, to require a profession of obedience rather than belief, because obedience can and will often be readily rendered where belief would be withheld.    But as states require declarations of allegiance to the sovereign, so they may require declarations of submission to the authority of a particular law.   If a man believes himself bound to refuse obedience to the law of Christianity, or will not pledge himself to regard it as paramount in authority to any human legislation, he cannot properly be a member of a society which conceives itself bound to regulate all its proceedings by this law, and cannot allow any of its provisions to be regarded as revocable or alterable.   But no human power can presume to enquire into the degree of a man's positive belief: the heretic was not properly he who did not believe what the church taught, but he who wilfully withdrew himself from its society, refusing to conform to its system, and setting up another system of his own.

 

I know that it will be objected to this, that it is no other than the system of the old philosophers, who upheld paganism as expedient, while they laughed at it in their hearts as false.    But he who makes such an objection must surly forget the essential difference between paganism and Christianity,   Paganism, in the days of the philosophers scarcely pretended to rest on a foundation of historical truth; no thinking man believed in it , except as allegorically true.    But Christianity commends itself to the minds of a vast majority of thinking men, as being true in fact no less the doctrine; they believe in it as literally true no less spiritually.   When I speak then of a state requiring obedience to the Christian law, it means that the state, being the perfect church, should do the church's work; that is that it should provide for the Christian education of the young, and the Christian instruction of the old; that it should, by public worship and by a Christian discipline, endeavour, as much as may be, to realise Christianity to all its people.    Under such a system, the teachers would speak because they believed, for Christian teachers as a general rule do so, and their hearers would, in like manner, learn to believe also.   Farther, the evidence of the Christian religion, in itself so unanswerable would be confirmed by the manifest witness of the Christian church, when possessing a real living constitution, and purified by an efficient discipline; SO THAT THE TEMPTATIONS TO UNBELIEF WOULD BE CONTINUALLY LESSENED, AND UNBELIEF, IN ALL HUMAN PROBABILITY, WOULD BECOME CONTINUALLY OF MORE RARE OCCURRENCE.   And possibly the time might come when a rejection of Christianity would be so clearly a moral offence, that profane writings would be as great a shock to all men's notions of right and wrong as obscene writings are now, and the one might be punished with no greater injury to liberty of conscience than the other.

 

But this general hearty belief in Christianity is to be regarded by the Christian society, whether it be called church or state, not as its starting point, but as its highest perfection.    To begin with a strict creed and no efficient Christian institutions, is the sure way to hypocrisy and unbelief; to begin with the most general confession of faith, imposed, that is, as a test of membership, but with rigorous Christian institutions, is the way most likely to lead, not only to a real and general belief, but also in a lively perception of the highest points of Christian faith.   In other words, intellectual objections to Christianity should be tolerated, where they are combined with moral obedience; tolerated because in a way they are most surely removed; whereas a corrupt or disorganised church with a minute creed, encourages intellectual objections; and if it proceeds to put them down by force, it does often violate the right of conscience, punishing an unbelief which its own evil has provoked, and , so far as human judgment can see, has in great measure justified. [Page 49]

DEBT-HUMAN PASSION-HUMAN ERROR.

[We must bear in mind the colossal debt  acquired - the immense loss of life and injury to persons and destruction of property over the past 100 years because of WAR  of which ONLY the INTERNATIONAL BANKSTERS {ROTHCHILDS...with their increasing boundless WEALTH are the VICTORS.]

 

 

 THE BANK OF ENGLAND FORMED IN 1694 THROUGH AN ACT OF PARLIAMENT-

A PRIVATE BANK OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONEY LENDERS

  
 

After such disorientation was spread, Charles Montagu, treasurer, key leader of the Venetian Junto, and part of the welcoming committee of the foreign invaders, established the Bank of England in 1694 through an act of Parliament, which was founded by William Paterson, an imported student of the Bank of Amsterdam. Montagu then organized large loans through the private Bank, controlled not by the King, but parliament, and while supposedly helping the war torn economy, created a giant monetary debt out of thin air, a quantity for speculation and impoverishment of England, proceeding to push through dictatorial financial decisions for the economy, while never once issuing anything for development. For the job, Montagu selected the alchemist and calculating machine Isaac Newton, appointing him Warden of the Mint to carry out the enormous data processing job involved in the lying and faking on behalf of the numerous transitions in the economy for the sake of the Empire, such as a gruesome recoinage which cut the people’s wealth in half.20Newton immediately proffered his niece for sexual favors to Montagu in payment for the appointment, and for extra credit, as Warden of the Mint Newton personally advocated the death penalty and torture for petty thieves of coin wherever possible.

 

More!

  
     

Economical questions arise obviously out of the history of all WARS,

although careless readers are apt to neglect them.   They arise out of that simple law of our nature which makes it necessary for every man to eat and drink and be clothed.   Common readers, and I am afraid I may add, many historians also, appear to write and read about military matters without recollecting this.   We hear of armies marching, advancing and retreating ,besieging towns , fighting battles, being engaged actively for some weeks or months, and are apt  to think of them solely as moving or fighting machines, whose success depends on the skill with which their general plays them, as if they were really so many chess-men.   Yet one would think it was sufficiently obvious that these armies are made up of men who must eat and drink every day, and who wear clothing.       Of the expence and difficulty of maintaining them it is not easy.  I grant, for private persons in peace to form an adequate idea.   Yet here we may gain something more of a notion of it than can be obtained readily in a private family.      A college will contain perhaps seventy or eighty members; let him go into the kitchen and see the number of pounds of meat required for the daily consumption of the college, and see what the cost will amount to.  Then he may think what it is to provide for the food not of eighty or ninety persons, but of twenty, or of forty, or of sixty, or even of a hundred thousand.       All this multitude doing nothing to raise food or make clothing for themselves, must be fed and clothed out of the wealth of the community.     Again this community many have to maintain not one of these armies but several, and large fleets besides, and this for many years together;  while it may often happen that its means of doing so are at the same time crippled;  ITS FOREIGN TRADE MAY BE CUT OFF, OR LARGE PORTIONS OF ITS TERRITORY MAY BE LAID WASTE; while the event of the contest being uncertain, and hope and confidence are checked, and with them credit perishes also.      It is then a light matter first to provide the necessary resources for such a contest, and next to see that they ARE NOT SPENT WASTEFULLY? [P144]

 

With regard to providing them, there is first the great question between DIRECT TAXATION and LOANS.   Shall we lay the whole burden of the contest upon the PRESENT GENERATION, or DIVIDE it between OURSELVES and POSTERITY?     Conceive now the DIFFICULTIES, the exceeding temptations, which beset the decisions of this QUESTION.   In a FREE GOVERNMENT it may be doubtful whether the people will consent to raise the money or no.  But suppose that legally they have no voice in the matter, that the government may lay on what taxes it will; still extreme discontent at home is not likely to be risked in the midst of a FOREIGN WAR; or if the people are willing to bear the burden still  the power may be wanting.   A tax may easily DESTROY ITSELF: that is, suppose that a man's trade just  yields him a profit which he can live upon, and a tax is laid upon him to the amount of a fourth part of his profit.   If he raises the price of his commodity to the consumer, the consumer will either purchase so much less of it, or will endeavour to procure it from other countries where the dealer being less heavily taxed can afford to sell on cheaper terms.  Then the government interposes to protect the taxed native dealer by prohibiting the importation of the commodity of the untaxed foreigner.   But such a prohibition running counter to the plain rule of common sense, which makes every man desire to buy a cheaper article rather than a dearer, when both  are of equal goodness, it can only be maintained by FORCE.   Thence arise the necessity of a large constabulary or preventative force to put down smuggling, and to say nothing of the moral evils produced by such a state of things, it is clear that the expense of the additional preventative force which the new tax rendered necessary, is all to be deducted from the profits of that tax; and this deduction, added to the falling off in its productiveness occasioned by the greater poverty of the tax payer, may reduce its return almost to NOTHING.

[Comments within brackets and headings-highlighting and Caps are Ours]

TO BE CONTINUED

The above extract taken from the works of Thomas Arnold, D. D., Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford and Head Master of Rugby School(1795-+1842)

 

[We shall be showing extracts from his work not necessarily in the order  of its publication because for our purpose we wish to confine ourselves to matters relevant to the present day on much that is now in jeopardy because of the intent of many of our politicians to DESTROY the very heart of a once great and ancient NATION STATE

 

'Christianity is the basis of republican government, its bond of cohesion, and life-giving law.- more than the Magna Carta itself the Gospels are the roots of English liberty -That Magna Carta and the Petition of Right, with our completing Declaration, was possible only because the Gospels had been before them.'-

R. S. Storrs

*

'The distinction between Christianity and all other systems of religion consists largely in this, that in these others men are found seeking God, while Christianity is God seeking men.-'

Thomas Arnold, D. D.(1795-1842) Head Master of Rugby School.

CHURCH AND STATE IN A CHRISTIAN COMMONWEALTH

 

" An alliance between church and state in a Christian  commonwealth, is ,in my opinion, an idle and a fanciful speculation.  An alliance is between two things that are in their nature distinct and independent, such as between two sovereign states.   But in a Christian commonwealth, the church and the state are one and the same thing , being different integral parts of the same whole.... Religion is so far, in my opinion, from being out of the province or duty of a Christian magistrate, that it is, and it ought to be, not only his care, but the principle thing in his care; because it is one of the great bonds of human society, and its object the supreme good, the ultimate end and object of man himself."

 

Speech on the Unitarian Petition, 1792.   Burke's Works,Vol. X. p.43 Ed. 1818.

 

*

 

THE BEGINNING!

 

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

  

 

HOW THE SATANISTS ARE GRADUALLY ACHIEVING THEIR AIM  IN DESTROYING AN ANCIENT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY AND ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

 

CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE

 

 

LORD RANDOLPH CHURCHILL

"Trust the People."

''But I own that my chief reason for supporting the Church of England I find in the fact that, when compared with other creeds and other sects, it is essentially the Church of religious liberty.   Whether in none direction or another, it is continually possessed by the ambition, not of excluding, but of including, all shades of religious thought, all sorts and conditions of men...I cannot, and will not, allow myself to believe that the English people, who are not only naturally religious, but also eminently practical... will ever consent to deprive themselves of so abundant a fountain of aid and consolation, or acquiesce in the demolition of an institution which elevates the life of the nation and consecratews the acts of the State...

 

Delivered by Lord Randolph Churchill at Birmingham on April 16th, 1884

 

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM

MARCH 16 -2012

 

H.F.1584

*

A REMINDER TO THOSE WHO STILL KOW-TOW TO

 BRUSSELS AND BERLIN

 

'...We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you.'

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

 EDMUND BURKE

 Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 *

1+2

 

 

 The

 I was accused of being racist, I knew political correctness had gone MAD

 

 

Political correctness had gone mad, writes TREVOR ... - Daily Mail

 
 

EXTRACT

A FEW weeks ago I observed that Barack Obama's iconic status as the first African-American US President should not obscure his mixed political record

For that, I was accused by one Radio 4 commentator of peddling a 'racist narrative

As a black man and former chairman of the

EQUALITY and HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

you might think I would be surprised to face a charge of

RACISM

but I was not.

For at a time when this country is crying out for frank discussion on issues such as race and sexuality, debate is being closed down because those who find offence in everything cry

RACIST or SEXIST.

The result - as I argue tonight in a TV programe -is that our

POLITICAL and CULTURAL ELITE

 seem unable to speak plainly about things that concern many citizens .

While our rulers seem to have all the time in the world to debate who should use the lavatory (in deference to the transgender lobby), they dismiss anxieties about

OVERCROWDED SCHOOLS

 DOCTORS SURGERIES

as merely a bigoted dislike of migrants.

HOW HAS THIS COME ABOUT?

[To follow]

Hounded...

Tyranny...

Hapless...

 

 

 

 

Full article

 

Multiculturalism is no longer right for Britain

[Mr Phillips has known for many years that MULTICULTURALISM WAS NEVER RIGHT FOR BRITAIN and in fact NOT  RIGHT

ANYWHERE.]

 

 

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

('the creation of a common mind') is a Soviet concept: 'Political correctness' means the exact reverse of what it says: It means that lies, or an 'imposed truth', supplant the objective truth' the exact reverse of what it says: it means that lies, or an 'imposed truth' supplant the objective truth. 'Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism' states, in an essay entitled 'Marxism-Leninism as a Philosophy and a WorldOutlook', that'...in deciding other affairs [sic], methods of public influence, the influence of public opinion will be utilised'. In a collectivised society, 'the Communist man...[is] distinguished by conscious collectivism and deep concern for the common good'; but the issues which preoccupy him are those imposed upon his controlled and easily manipulated mind by 'political correctness'.  In his closing remarks to the 28th CPSU Congress on 13th July 1990, Mikhail Gorbachev said that the restructured' CPSU would become a truly vanguard party whose power lies not in giving orders but in influencing people's minds'.

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

BY

CHRISTOPHER STORY

[WE HAVE A LARGE NUMBER OF BULLETINS ON OUR WEBSITE SINCE 2005 DETAILING THE WORK OF THE ABOVE

A

TRUTH SEEKER AND PATRIOT

*

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

ENEMY OF ITS MEMBER STATES BY CHRISTOPHER STORY -

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

*

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

FEBRUARY 23, 2017

H F 1130 FREEDOM NOW

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

*  *  *

 

The Balfour Declaration [1916] : Time to say sorry. Time we made amends.

By Stuart Littlewood on July 22, 2017

by Stuart Littlewood

 

In a letter to a local newspaper about Brexit and the way prime minister Theresa May is handling it, I happened to mention in passing the Balfour Declaration, criticising her plans to celebrate the centenary “with pride” and invite Israel’s PM Netanyahu to the fun. This drew a sharp response from someone spouting the usual Israeli propaganda ‘facts’ and saying my attitude harmed the Jewish community worldwide.

The Balfour Declaration is a deadly serious subject. It is a cause of great horror and grief, of justifiable international anger, and a matter for profound regret. This is a right time and proper time for debate. Let’s focus on it for the next few months because justice groups are urging the British Government to mark the Balfour Declaration centenary by saying sorry.

Mrs May could do some real good here. She could, at a stroke, help quell the destructive turmoil in the Middle East and begin repair to Britain’s tattered prestige. She could even open new trade routes into Islamic markets, vitally important as we leave the EU.

By eating a little humble pie and apologising on our behalf for 100 years of agony inflicted on lovely people in a lovely part of the world Mrs May could take a giant step for mankind on the world stage. She has between now and November to do it. Will she?

No, she’ll be celebrating Balfour in style with the Israeli prime minister and not giving a toss about the people Britain wronged.

Which is shocking when a UN report recently branded Israel an apartheid regime. It’s even more regrettable considering the desperate cry for help from the National Coalition of Christian Organizations in Palestine in an open letter to the World Council of Churches and the ecumenical movement, signed by over 30 organisations in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.

Here’s an extract: “We are still suffering from 100 years of injustice and oppression that were inflicted on the Palestinian people beginning with the unlawful Balfour declaration… followed by the Israeli occupation of the West Bank including East Jerusalem and Gaza and the fragmentation of our people and our land through policies of isolation and confiscation, and the building of Jewish-only settlements and the Apartheid Wall…”

Mrs May needs a jolt.

When I enquired whether the Balfour Declaration is taught in our schools I was told ‘no’. So what exactly is it?

Arthur Balfour, British foreign secretary in 1917, penned a letter to the most senior Jew in England, Lord Rothschild – pledging the Government’s “best endeavours” to facilitate the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people. Balfour also wrote: “We do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country.”

It amounted to a betrayal of our Arab allies in WW1. Many in Parliament objected, including Lord Sydenham who remarked: “What we have done, by concessions not to the Jewish people but to a Zionist extreme section, is to start a running sore in the East, and no-one can tell how far that sore will extend.”

At the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 when the Great Powers carved up the territorial spoils of war a Zionist delegation produced Balfour’s promissory note. It planted a powder-keg in the Middle East and the fuse was now lit. Britain accepted the mandate responsibility for Palestine and eventually in 1947 the Great Powers pushed the United Nations into partitioning the territory, again without consulting those who lived there.

So what made Balfour do it? The more you delve, the more incredible the answers to those unaware of the growing influence of worldwide Zionism. Support for the movement and its ambition to create a New Israel was quite fashionable in the corridors of power around the time of WW1. The story I find compelling is that, while Britain struggled desperately against German U-boat successes and ammunition shortages, the Zionist power-brokers of Germany and Eastern Europe consulted with their opposite numbers in America and decided, given their grip on money and media, they could bring the US into the war against Germany and its Ottoman ally if Britain were to promise them Palestine for a Jewish homeland afterwards.

Balfour was a Zionist convert (as were many others including prime minister David Lloyd-George) and in the right position. The proposition was put to Britain in 1916. The Zionists delivered. The US entered the war. In the meantime immigrant Polish-Zionist chemist Chaim Weizmann offered a solution to the production of enough acetone, a critical ingredient in cordite for artillery shells, to satisfy the war effort. He demanded the same promise. Balfour handed them their ‘receipt’ in November 1917 even though Palestine was not, and never could be, Britain’s to give away.

‘Name of the game: erasing Palestine’

Balfour had inserted into his ‘declaration’ that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing and non-Jewish communities….” on the insistence of the only Jew in the British Cabinet, Lord Montague, who was anti-Zionist and opposed the deal. But this safeguard was jettisoned as soon as Britain lost control of events.

Not content with the territory allocated to them under the UN Partition Plan the Israelis declared statehood ignoring all boundaries. Their ‘Plan Dalet’ offensive, begun beforehand, had seized much Arab-designated land at gunpoint.  Jewish militia – the Irgun, Haganah, Palmach and Lehi – raided towns and villages forcing inhabitants to flee. Numerous attrocities were committed including the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem (headquarters of the British administration) in 1946 murdering 91, and the massacres at Deir Yassin and Lydda in 1948.

Today Israel illegally occupies the West Bank and East Jerusalem, including the Old City, and has Gaza in a stranglehold so pitiless as to have caused a long-term humanitarian crisis and irreparable environmental damage. For nearly 70 years millions of dispossessed Palestinians and their families have languished in refugee camps, and those who remain in their homeland – Christian and Muslim alike – live a miserable life under brutal military occupation.

The situation stands as a monumental stain on the flag of the United Nations, which hasn’t the backbone to take action. And the continuing repercussions throughout the Holy Land should concern all true Christians and Muslims especially regular churchgoers like Mrs May.

Miko Peled, the son of an Israeli general and a former soldier in the Israeli army – and now an important figure in the struggle for justice – confirms what many have been saying for years: “The name of the game: erasing Palestine, getting rid of the people and de-Arabizing the country… By 1993 the Israelis had achieved their mission to make the conquest of the West Bank irreversible…. That is when Israel said, OK, we’ll begin negotiations…”

My critic in the local newspaper called Hamas terrorists. Peled describes the Israeli army, in which he served, as “one of the best trained and best equipped and best fed terrorist organisations in the world.” Take your pick. But Hamas’ political wing is not proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the UK.

The accusation that criticising the Israeli regime harms Jewish communities is unacceptable. There are many admirable Jewish groups vehemently campaigning against Israel’s crimes. One-time Israeli Military Intelligence chief Yehoshafat Harkabi warned that Jews throughout the world would pay the price of Israel’s misconduct. So the problem appears to be ‘family’ matter between Jews everywhere.

Related Posts:
 
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

 
Posted by on July 22, 2017, With 1416 Reads Filed under Government & Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

JULY 22-2017

FaceBook Comments

H.F.1261.-JULY 22,2017

*  *  *

[There is a well-known phrase:

'People's are not evil ONLY individuals are evil.'

We have no hatred for the Israeli people  of whom many of them at home and abroad in the USA and around the world hate ZIONISM and its brutal and destructive agenda. It thrives on WAR and EXPLOITATION and they are pushing ahead for a WAR against IRAN.

Unfortunately for the English people their traitorous PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON and many others in WESTMINSTER and in the country are the very SERVANTS of that hateful dogma which is leading towards a ONE-WORLD CORPORATISM/GOVERNMENT which apart from an ELITE and SLAVES there will be no place on PLANET EARTH for the majority of MANKIND.   As we have already mentioned about the SURPRISE ATTACK by ATTACK HELICOPTERS accompanied by a POLICE HELICOPTER on our property during the recent  PARLIAMENTARY RECESS.   WE understand that the FOREIGN Minister and BILDERBERGER William Hague is responsible for the Security Service MI6 and GCHQ -  possibly he could explain why the intrusive and noisy operation took place above a quiet country village at NOON on a Sunday.    Now we know why we received those visitors possibly from a USA BASE in the UK.  The WAR in LIBYA was but a stepping stone to the remaining non-ROTHCHILD CENTRAL BANKS countries who will fall in the very near future.       We have been WARNING for a few years for you to NOT!  vote for  the BILDERBERGERS the SERVANTS of the ILLUMINATI/ZIONISM who CONTROL the GOVERNMENT and so-called OPPOSITION parties at WESTMINSTER and  have no love for NATION STATES particularly those such as ENGLAND who still has some FREEDOM but that is now under THREAT as witnessed by the introduction of the CONTINENTAL SYSTEM of Corpus Juris into our

JewsnotZionists

*

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-/

David-Cameron-doesn't-understand-Conservative-party.

[Well we are sure the majority of the population must feel the same way.  NO SUBSTANCE!-NO CONSERVATIVE and certainly NO STATESMAN but PR THROUGH AND THROUGH, and apart from a few politicians deserving such a term over the past 100 years the pick since the Second World War brings us but a few which are too obvious for us to note . We have to look to the Victorian Age to compare how so much that is now wrong with our society:

'Between 1871 and 1875 our birth-rate reached its highest point, round about 35 per thousand, and the United Kingdom population, which had been 27 million in 1851, rose in the next thirty years to nearly 35 millions.   In much the same period they invested over £1000 million overseas, while 2.[5] million British subjects migrated to the British Colonies and the United States.   The tonnage cleared in our ports grew from less than 15 millions to nearly 60 , almost one-third of the world's sea-going ships were British.   In 1850 exports were valued at £197millions but at £297 millions in 1874, imports rising even more from £100 millions to £370 millions , while at the last date the total foreign trade of Britain and her Colonies equalled that of France, Germany, Italy, and the United States all rolled together.   Except for the Crimea, ,the country was engaged in no major war .  Much that had been tentative  in the Empire of 1850 was made solid; Canada was confederated, Australian self-government determined, in India the mutiny was suppressed and government transferred to the Crown.   Memorable things were done for the life  of the mother State.   Universities were opened and reformed, the modern civil service created, education made universal, the parliamentary electorate doubled, the courts of law modenized, trade unions given their full status, and the position of women revolutionized.  As for the achievements of the spirit, in the years between Wordsworth death in 1850 and Carlyle's in 1881, a  great body of immortal British literature and thought was made:  by Tennyson, Browning, and Ruskin; Dickens, Thackery , and George Elliot; Newman and Mathew Arnold;  Macauly,  Mill, and T. H .Green, Darwin, Huxley , and Tyndall; Bagehot, Henry Maine, and Herbert Spencer; J. R .Green, [Lord} Acton and Froude; Meridith, Thomas Hardy, and William Morris; Westcott, Lightfoot, and Martineau; Clerk Maxwell and F.H.Bradley.'

-A HISTORY OF ENGLAND-by Keith Feiling-1948

[As many more people are now aware that since the 50's secret meetings of the BILDERBERGERS in the BILDERBERGER HOTEL in the Netherlands began with the aim of the destruction of the nation state to be replaced by a ONE-WORLD/CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT. It is no coincidence that the main-players on the political scene in England are these same traitors who meet in secret to discuss their satanic plans while attempting to be representatives of the people . As we have mentioned so many times how can these same individuals serve two masters-either the PEOPLE or the ILLUMINATI not BOTH.  But as shown above the PRESS and MEDIA in the main refuse to highlight this destructive subversive and traitorous element in our PARLIAMENT and the population at large appears not to be interested that their country is now ruled SERVANTS of a FOREIGN POWER.]

CLICKStartpage

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

real-tough-men-in-america-and-israel-are-against

-an-attack-on-iran.

*

[GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND'

LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-

GERMANY.

ADDED JULY 28,2018

AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2009.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 21,2017

H.F.1355

*  *  *

 

Conservative Friends of Israel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Conservative Friends of Israel, abbreviated to CFI, is a British parliamentary group affiliated to the Conservative Party, which is dedicated to strengthening business, cultural and political ties between the United Kingdom and Israel. CFI is an unincorporated association. It also seeks to strengthen ties between the British Conservative Party and the Israeli Likud party.

It was founded in 1974 by Conservative MP for Bury and Radcliffe, Michael Fidler. It is currently chaired by Stuart Polak. The Parliamentary Chairman is James Arbuthnot, the Parliamentary President is Baroness Shephard of Northwold. The Vice Chairmen are John Butterfill and James Clappison, the Secretary is David Amess, the Officers are Alistair Burt, Lee Scott, and Theresa Villiers, and the Chairman of CFI Europe is Timothy Kirkhope.

In 1995 Conservative politician Robert Rhodes James called it "the largest organisation in Western Europe dedicated to the cause of the people of Israel".[1]

By 2009, according to the Channel 4 documentary Dispatches – Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, around 80% of Conservative MPs were members of the CFI.[2] In 2013, Peter Oborne, the Daily Telegraph's chief political commentator called CFI “by far Britain’s most powerful pro-Israel lobbying group”. The same is true of AIPAC in the US.”[3]

 

 

Activities[edit]

The group's 2005 strategy identified the following areas of activity: supporting Israel, promoting the British Conservative Party, fighting terrorism, combating anti-semitism, and promoting peace in the Middle East.[4] According to their website, "over two thirds" of Conservative MPs were members of Conservative Friends of Israel in 2006.[5] In 2007 the Political Director stated it had over 2000 members and registered supporters.[6] In 2009, at least half of the shadow cabinet were members of the group according to a Dispatches documentary.[7]

Their website states the opinion that it is one of the fastest growing political lobby groups in the UK.[8] According to the Dispatches documentary, between 2006 and 2009 the CFI funded more than 30 Conservative parliamentary candidates to visit Israel.[7]

In 2012 CFI reconstituted itself as a private company limited by guarantee.[9]

CFI annual business lunch[edit]

David Cameron, then newly elected leader of the Conservative Party, addressed the CFI annual business lunch on 30 January 2006, whose audience included half of the Conservative Parliamentary Party. As part of his speech, he stated "I am proud not just to be a Conservative, but a Conservative friend of Israel; and I am proud of the key role CFI plays within our Party. Israel is a democracy, a strong and proud democracy, in a region that is, we hope, making its first steps in that direction."[10]

Former Conservative party leaders Iain Duncan Smith[11] and Michael Howard[12] have addressed the CFI lunch.

The British Pakistani MP Sajid Javid has also made business lunch speeches which have been positively received by the CFI, the Jewish Chronicle even reporting Javid as a future Prime Minister.[13]

Donations[edit]

The Dispatches documentary claimed members of the group and their companies have donated over £10 million to the Conservative party between 2001 and 2009. The group called this figure "deeply flawed" saying that they have only donated £30,000 between 2004 and 2009 but that members of the group have undoubtedly made their own donations to the party. Dispatches described the CFI as "beyond doubt the most well-connected and probably the best funded of all Westminster lobbying groups".[2][7]

Members of CFI[edit]

According to the CFI website 80% of Tory MPs are members of Conservative Friends of Israel.[14]

In alphabetical order, members of Conservative Friends of Israel include:

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Peter Oborne (12 December 2012). "The cowardice at the heart of our relationship with Israel". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
  2. ^ a b Dispatches: Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, Channel 4, Monday 16 November 2009
  3. ^ Peter Oborne, Iran nuclear deal: ill-informed friends of Israel are refusing to face facts, Daily Telegraph, 27 November 2013, accessed 10 August 2015
  4. ^ CFI INFORMED Magazine, Second Edition (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, February 2007, p. 3, retrieved 29 May 2008 [dead link]
  5. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel – About Us
  6. ^ Robert Halfon (27 September 2007). "Introducing the CFI". ConservativeHome. Retrieved 20 August 2012. 
  7. ^ a b c Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 16 November 2009. 
  8. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel web site
  9. ^ "Companies House WebCHeck - CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL LIMITED". Companies House. Company No. 08114952. Archived from the original on 29 December 2008. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
  10. ^ CFI INFORMED Weekly Briefing (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, 3 February 2006, retrieved 25 May 2006 [dead link]
  11. ^ Duncan Smith: Israel has the right to defend itself against terrorists, Conservatives.com, 10 December 2001
  12. ^ "Howard Speech to the Conservative Friends of Israel, at the Savoy Hotel, London". Conservatives.com. 6 December 2004. Archived from the original on 12 December 2004. 
  13. ^ http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/94117/muslim-tory-mp-after-britain-israel-best
  14. ^ a b "About CFI". Conservative Friends of Israel. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
  15. ^ "Ministers "will change" war crimes arrest law". Jewish Chronicle. 8 July 2010. 
  16. ^ "Altrincham and Sale West: Election 2010". Jewish Chronicle. 29 April 2010. 
  17. ^ "UK: Evangelical Christian appointed new UK Middle East Minister". The Muslim News. 15 May 2010. Archived from the original on 22 March 2012. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
  18. ^ "British MPs furious after Israel President Shimon Peres accuses the English of being anti-semitic". Daily Mail. UK. 1 August 2010. 
  19. ^ a b "Cameron's Cabinet: Who are they?". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
  20. ^ "Mike's Biography". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
  21. ^ "William Hague's Schmooze With The Jewish News". Totally Jewish. 25 March 2010. 
  22. ^ a b "Ministers lose seats in the East". East Anglia Daily Times. 7 May 2010. 
  23. ^ Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. 
  24. ^ "About Conservative Friends of Israel". cfoi.co.uk. Retrieved 22 September 2011. 
  25. ^ "Eric Pickles to lead MPs’ delegation to Israel". Jewish Chronicle. July 24, 2015. 
  26. ^ "Rifkind elected as Kensington MP". Jewish Chronicle. 7 May 2010. 
  27. ^ Sloan, Alaistair. "Ed Miliband will back Israel". Middle East Monitor. Retrieved 13 April 2015. 

External links[edit]

 

[GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-GERMANY.

ADDED JULY 28,2018

AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2009.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 21,2017

H.F.1355

*  *  *

VIGILANCE IS THE ORDER OF THE DAY!

*

 QUOTE 684 of 900

ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS

Jewish objectives as outlined in Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

1) Banish God from the heavens and Christianity from the earth.

2) Allow no private ownership of property or business.

3) Abolish marriage, family and home. Encourage sexual promiscuity, homosexuality, adultery, and fornication.

4) Completely destroy the sovereignty of all nations and every feeling or expression of patriotism.

5) Establish a one-world government through which the Luciferian Illuminati elite can rule the world. All other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose.

6) Take the education of children completely away from the parents. Cunningly and subtly lead the people thinking that compulsory school attendance laws are absolutely necessary to prevent illiteracy and to prepare children for better positions and life's responsibilities. Then after the children are forced to attend the schools get control of normal schools and teacher's colleges and also the writing and selection of all text books.

7) Take all prayer and Bible instruction out of the schools and introduce pornography, vulgarity, and courses in sex. If we can make one generation of any nation immoral and sexy, we can take that nation.

8) Completely destroy every thought of patriotism, national sovereignty, individualism, and a private competitive enterprise system.

9) Circulate vulgar, pornographic literature and pictures and encourage the unrestricted sale and general use of alcoholic beverage and drugs to weaken and corrupt the youth.

10) Foment, precipitate and finance large scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt the nations and thereby force them into a one-world government.

11) Secretly infiltrate and control colleges, universities, labor unions, political parties, churches, patriotic organizations, and governments. These are direct quotes from their own writings (The Conflict of the Ages, by Clemens Gaebelein pp. 100-102).

12) The creation of a World Government.

KGB CHART NOW TO DESTROY A PEOPLE AND NATION

More!

  

 

H.F.741

*  *  *

("IN MY VIEW BOTH THE BURKA AND NIQAB SHOULD BE

 

BANNED

 

 AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN FRANCE AND BELGIUM AND ELSEWHERE."

by

Dr Taj Hargey-

Director of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, and Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation)

Diversity should not trump right to a happy foster home | Daily Mail ...

 

...

Tuesday, August 29,2017

An

An obsession with diversity should NEVER trump a child's right to a happy foster home

The social services industry prides itself on its cultural sensitivity, especially when it comes to fostering and adoption.

Respect for background and identity is meant to be central to the process of finding a home for a vulnerable child.

But that ideal has utterly broken down in the case that emerged yesterday, in which it was reported that a five-year-old girl from a white Christian family was placed by Tower Hamlets council in London in two successive Muslim households.

Much to the child’s distress — as logged in confidential local authority reports seen by The Times — neither family seems to have shown much respect or understanding for her upbringing or faith.

One supervisor is reported to have described her sobbing as she begged not to go back to the carer’s home because

‘they don’t speak English’.

A necklace with a crucifix was apparently taken from her and she was told to learn Arabic. She was also told that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’. 

When, on a visit to her birth mother, she was given her favourite dish of spaghetti carbonara to take back to her foster home, she was banned from eating it because it contained bacon.

Compounding what must have been this child’s sense of alienation, her first carer, with whom she spent four months, is said to have worn the niqab — a face veil — when outside the family home.

In the second and current placement, her carer wore the all-enveloping burka and fully concealed her face in public.

(In my view, this is a garment that should have no place in British society. Both the burka and niqab should be banned, as they have been in France, Belgium and elsewhere.)

It is absolutely right that MPs demand an inquiry into this appalling example of forced cultural convergence.

Social services bosses love to prattle about human rights, but the treatment of this little girl represents a denial of her most basic rights.

If the reports are correct, she has been plunged into an unfamiliar environment of language, creed and dress code, where her carers make plain they have little time for her family or heritage.

To a young child, of course, such words mean little — but we can imagine her confusion and anxiety at the apparent hostility towards her background, the dismissive description of its women and its ancient festivals.

And let’s not forget that she is likely to have been traumatised already by difficult family circumstances.

This is yet another case in which the dogma of liberal political correctness appears to have triumphed over common sense. How else could one even begin to rationalise placing this child in strict Muslim households?

Here is what should happen now. The girl should be removed immediately from her current foster parents to a more appropriate placement. Then the social workers and their line managers who made this insensitive decision should be named, shamed and dismissed.

Alienation...

*

Poisonous...

*

Tolerance...

*

Full article

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4831638/Diversity-not-trump-right-happy-foster-home.html#ixzz4r8xRffzN
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT -NOT MULTICULTURE

*

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

*

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

*

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

 

H.F.1289

*  *  *

 

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE

- TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUITY

-NOT MULTICULTURAL.

*

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH

Wednesday, June 7,2006

*

 Britain is an old country and our ways deserve respect.

by

Simon Heffer

 There are few things more enjoyable than when a Leftie admits, or pretends to admit, he was wrong.

 We saw it a year ago when Trevor Phillips, commissioner-in-chief of the Commission for racial Equality, said that

MULTICULTURLISM

 -had not been a huge success, and that those from other cultures who came here were better off learning to be British.

 

[‘When in Rome do as the Romans do’ so those fortunate to find a home in England need to concentrate on English culture and those who go West or North of the border will soon get to know how to integrate with the local scene.

We have a Queen of England -We have a Church of England- just about so long as the Man of many Faiths does not get his way. We have English Law -just about, and so many things of English origin and practice that we would be repeating ourselves to declare an interest.

 

[The term British we leave as an overall label to embrace England as a partner with the other sister nation states in our island home and we hope one day our neighbours will come to the realisation that their interests should also include the interests of the People of England who by the way are getting quite fed-up with the way they pay the lion’s share of their increased benefits without the right to have their solely English issues raised in OUR House of Commons the concern of English MPs ONLY. ]

  

To Continue:

 I think [Trevor Phillips] he was sincere. I am less sure about Gordon Brown, who bores about Britishness almost daily.

It is a sort of thing that allows a socialist such as Mr Brown to fake some point of contact with conservative-minded patriots.

 It is also his way of trying to hide the fact that his own party’s policies have split up the United Kingdom and made his position, as a Scot sitting for a Scottish seat who wants to be Prime Minister mostly of

ENGLAND

-somewhat precarious.

Not all the Left has, however twigged that

MULTICULTURLISM

-is rather last century.

Someone of whom I hoped we had heard the last, the former

Archbishop of Canterbury-Lord Carey

-made a predictable intervention in this debate from beyond the grave last weekend.

 

He proclaimed that the Coronation of our next monarch must be an “interfaith” event. The ceremony must, he added, “have “very significant changes”, so that it is “inclusive” of other religions in Britain.

 

Lord Carey clearly has in mind what Private Eye would term a “Rocky Horror” coronation service. Never mind your archbishops, or even your Christians, your imams, your rabbis, ayatollahs, your assorted holy men and other diverse priests, layers -on-hands and speakers-in-tongues: in accordance with the professions of religious belief on the 2001 census forms, I expect to see a few Jedi knights in the sanctuary, while devotees of Ras Tafari smoke ganja at the high altar. And, as one of the realm’s noisiest atheists, I hope for a part in the proceedings, too, that I might feel “included”.

 

Having long regarded the Church of England as many people regard EastEnders, I have steeled myself not to intrude in its private grief, but to lament the largely self-inflicted decline of this great institution. Though it has, to my great spiritual regret, nothing to offer me personally, I can appreciate not merely the potential it has to succour and strengthen millions of believers, but also its role in

OUR CULTURE

OUR CONSTITUTION

OUR NATION

 

At the heart of this remains the great legacy of the

 

REFORMATION

  -that the

Monarch

 

is Supreme Governor

of the

Church of England.

-which is the Established Church of this Realm.

 

As the 37th of the 39 Articles (“on the Civil Magistrates”) puts it,

 

“the Bishop of Rome hath no jurisdiction in this

Realm of England.

 

Quite right: and were we to update that Article as we fetishistically seek to update everything else, we might also add that no mullahs, rabbi, Jedi or Rastafarian has any jurisdiction here.

 

However, intrude into the Church’s grief we now must: for Lord Carey’s successor on the throne of St Augustine, Dr Rowan Williams, who in many regards seems even more to inhabit the wilder shores of the theology than Lord Carey, is having none of this nonsense.

 

He has picked up on the threat issued by our probable next monarch, the Prince of Wales, in 1994 about how (in that very “ last century” spirit) the Prince wanted to be

 

“Defender of Faiths”

 

Some of us boring old pedants saw the stupidity of this at the time. It is not in a King’s job description to defend “faiths”, and cannot be unless the whole constitutional arrangement that binds Church and State is unravelled.

 

More to the point, the notion of defending “faiths” imposes the King on secular legal matters -for the practising of faiths other than that of the Established Church is defended in fact by various Acts of Parliament- in which he has no place.

 

Although one has never been entirely sure that the Prince of Wales has fully grasped this point, he is NOT a politician; and few things these days are more political than the right to profess assorted faiths that NOT traditional to this country.

 

Dr Williams said of the Prince in 2003 that “Unless something really radical happens with the Constitution, he is, like it or not,

 

Defender of the Faith

 

-and he has a relationship with the Christian Church of a kind that he does not have with other communities”.

 

THAT IS SELF-EVIDENTLY THE CASE.

 

Of course, were our Queen to emulate her late mother (and I fervently hope she does) there will be no Coronation for another 20 or so years.

 

Perhaps the needless vandalism of

 

OUR CONSTITUTION

 

-will have been completed by then.

 

Perhaps there will be a different heir to the throne [Prince William]. Perhaps the moon will be made of green cheese. Until such times as these things happen, Dr William’s view must prevail, and his predecessor would be best advised to keep his bizarre views to himself.

 

For the Coronation Service, religious though it be, is about more than religion.

 

When the time comes, only a relatively small section of our people (and by no means just Christians, let alone Anglicans) would savour the religious significance of the EVENT.

 

For the rest of us, the symbolism will transcend the religious. Some will see the CONSTITUTIONAL point, and realise how the traditional form of words and practices provides us with a Monarch who will carry on business as usual.

 

For most of those watching the their plasma screens, however, the day will be about a sense of familiar NATIONAL IDENTITY

-embodied, however much or little they realise it, in the person of the

NEW SOVEREIGN.

 

Now, Lord Carey might argue that altering the service to “include” Shias, Sunnis, Hindus, Zoroastrians and Jehovah’s Witnesses would not altar that symbolism:

 

But he would be WRONG!

 

It is not only that too many of our people have seen newsreels of the last Coronation 53 years ago, and therefore have a fixed cultural idea of what it is supposed to be. It is about the NEW MONARCH, and the CEREMONY of CORONATION of which he is the heart, fitting in with what his people understand, implicitly or explicitly, about THEMSELVES, and the NATION of which they are A PART.

 

It is Trevor Philip’s point writ large: -it is about a country being given its cultural stability partly by

HISTORY and TRADITION

-and about people buying into that when they choose to become A PART of the COUNTRY.

 

That is what inclusiveness means: It is how countries as diverse as France and America both do things. It is about having a template of Frenchness or American-ness, and welcoming people into that civilisation and THOSE humane values by asking them to participate in them. We still, despite the attempts of such VANDALS as LORD CAREY, have a core CULTURE in this COUNTRY.

 

Christianity and the expectation that Christianity will, for historic reasons prevail and be accepted as prevalent, are central to that CULTURE. And a few events in the nation’s life symbolise such an understanding more than the traditional coronation service.

 

The next CORONATION will be a formal renewal of

OUR WAY OF LIFE

And

OUR VALUES.

 

It will formally recognise not only the legitimacy of the MONARCH in the eyes of GOD and the BRITISH constitution, but also of the identification of the vast majority of his subjects with the process of doing so. For that reason above all others it must be clear, comprehensible and in keeping with public expectations of such an event.

 

WE ARE NOT A MULTICUTURAL SOCIETY

 

WE ARE A MONOCULTURAL ONE -TOLERANT OF OTHER CULTURES.

 

AND WHOSE CLEAR IDENTITY IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE PEOPLE - IF NOT BY THEIR LEADERS.

 

WE ARE AN OLD COUNTRY WITH A STRONG SENSE OF CONTINUITY.

 

AND ANYONE WHO TRIFLES WITH SUCH MANIFESTATIONS OF OUR ANTIQUITY AND STABILITY DOES SO AT HIS PERIL.

 

* * *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWS

*

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY HENRY LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FRANCE

MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF NAPLES

1844

 

GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

 

CONSTITUTION OF ENGLAND

 

Before we commence with extracts from the above we need to investigate the term British and what it meant in 1908 and the confusion that has arisen since the devolution has occurred in Scotland in their Scottish Parliament and the Assembly in Wales.

 

To assist us in this regard we have the brilliant Constitutional History of England (1908) by the learned Professor F.W Maitland an authority of world renown.

*

 

Nationality and Domicile

 

In speaking of king and parliament we are no longer speaking of what in strictness of language are merely English institutions; the parliament represents the United Kingdom, and king and parliament have supreme legislative power over territories which lie in every quarter of the globe.

 

Of this parliament we must speak.

 

Below it there are many institutions, some of which are specifically Scottish, Irish, Canadian, Australian, Indian; for example the judicial systems of England, Ireland and Scotland are distinct from each other, though at the supreme point they unite in the House of Lords.

 

It is of great importance to distinguish those institutions which like the kingship and the parliament are (we can hardly avoid the term) imperial institutions, from those which like the

HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

-are specifically English, and I strongly advise you not to use the words England and English when you mean what is larger than England and more than English.

 

When we have dealt with the institutions, which have power over all the British dominions, we shall, being Englishmen in an English university, deal with some purely English institutions the High Court of Justice, not with the Scottish Court of Sessions -but let us keep this distinction firmly in our minds; if we are Englishmen, we are subjects of a sovereign whose power extends over millions and millions of men who are not English. [1908]

 

Let me illustrate this by a further remark. There are two conceptions, which are of great importance to students of international law:

 

-the one nationality, the other domicile.

 

Now there is no such thing as English nationality, and there is no such thing as British domicile. [1908]

The Englishman, the Scot, the Irishman, the Canadian, and the Australian -all of these have a nationality in common. [1908]

 

If there be a war between the United Kingdom and a foreign power, say France, all of them are enemies of the French, any of them who side with the French are traitors. [1908]

 

But there is no such thing as British domicile -

Because there is no one system of private law common to all the British dominions; a man is domiciled in England or Scotland or New Zealand, and to a very large extent the law under which he lives varies with his place of domicile.

 

If I abandon my English domicile, and become domiciled in Scotland, this will have important legal results for me, but my nationality remains what it was. So by England let us mean England, a land, which consists of fifty-two counties [1908]

 

We have included the above extracts from

The

 

CONSTITUTIONAL

HISTORY

OF

ENGLAND

 

by

 

F.W MAITLAND [1908]

 

-to show the destruction of the British Constitution over the past 75 years and particularly in the last nine years under Blairdom has shown that the title of British has led to much confusion as the foundation of that concept has now been undermined with the Englishman having to pretend that there is in fact a British Constitution when we have a Scottish Parliament and an Assembly in Wales no doubt in time to be a parliament.

 

The term BRITISH should ONLY be used when it concerns ALL the nation States within our island home -such as with Defence as virtually all other matters have been handed over to the other national bodies in Scotland and Wales.

 

Let us hear no more about Britishness but more about Englishness-Scottishness and Welshness because that is the situation we find ourselves in 2006.

To return to Britishness in our shared island there needs to be a return of an

English Parliament.

Only then will the term British regain its true meaning.

To continue:

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY

LORD BROUGHAM

*

CHAPTER VIII

 THE National Resistance was not only, n point of Historical fact, the cause of the Revolutionary settlement, it was the main foundation of that settlement; the structure of the government was made to rest upon the people’s

Right of Resistance

[Even in 2006]

-as upon its cornerstone; and it is of incalculable importance that this never should be lost sight of.

But it is of equal importance that we should ever bear in mind how essential to the preservation of the CONSTITUTION, thus established and secured, this principle of RESISTANCE is; how necessary both for the governors and the governed it ever must be to regard the recourse to that extremity as always possible -an extremity, no doubt, and to be cautiously embraced as such, but still a remedy within the people’s reach; a protection to which they CAN and WILL resort as often as their rulers make such a recourse necessary for self-defence.

 

[DO YOU UNDERSTAND

TONY BLAIR?]

 

The whole history of the CONSTITUTION, which we have been occupied, in tracing from the earliest ages, abounds with proofs how easily absolute power may be exercised, [AS in 2006] and the RIGHTS of the people best secured by LAW be trampled upon, while the theory of a FREE GOVERNMENT remains unaltered. [AS in 2006] and all institutions framed for the CONTROL of the EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT [AS in 2006] and all the LAWS designed for the protection of the subject, continue as entire as at the moment they were first founded by the struggles of the PEOPLE, and cemented by their labour or their BLOOD.

The thirty renewals of

MAGNA CARTA

-the constant and almost unresisted invasions of the exclusive right of PARLIAMENT to levy taxes by the Plantagenet Princes of the House of York -the base subserviency of the PARLIAMENT [AS in 2006] to the vindictive measures of parties, alternately successful, during the troubled times of the Lancaster line -the yet more vile submission to the same body to the first Tudors -their suffering arbitrary power to regain its pitch after it had been extirpated in the seventeenth century -the frightful lesson of distrust in Parliament, and in the institutions and all laws , taught by the ease with which Charles II [AS with Tony Blair in 2006] governed almost without control, at the very period fixed upon by our best writers as tat of the Constitution’s greatest theoretical perfection-and , above all, the very narrow escape which this country had of absolute Monarchy, by the happy accident of James II choosing to assail the religion of the people before he had destroyed their liberty, and making the Church his enemy instead of using it as his willing and potent ally against all civil liberty- these are such passages in the history of our government as may well teach us to distrust all mere STATUTORY securities; to remember that JUDGES, PARLIAMENTS, and MINISTERS, as well as KINGS, are frail men, the sport of sordid propensities, or vain fears, or factious passions; and that the people never can be safe without a constant determination to resist unto death as often as their

RIGHTS are INVADED.

The main security which our institutions afford, and that which will always render a recourse to the

RIGHT of RESISTANCE

 

-less needful, must ever consist in the pure constitution of Parliament-the extended basis of our popular representation. This is the great improvement, which it had received since the REVOLUTION…

 

In 1831 and 1832 the Parliamentary constitution was placed upon a wider and more secure basis; and although much yet remains to be accomplished before we can justly affirm that all classes are duly represented in Parliament, assuredly we are no longer exposed to the same risks of seeing LIBERTIES destroyed, and the same hazard of having to protect ourselves by resistance; nor can any one now deny that the democratic principle enters largely into the frame of our MIXED MONARCHY

 

This great change is much more than sufficient to counterbalance all the increase of influence that as been acquired by the CROWN since the REVOLUTION, including the vexations which unavoidably attend the administration of our fiscal laws for the collection and protection of a vast revenue, and the creation of a numerous and important body. Always averse to struggle under the worst oppressions, and always the sure ally of power- I mean the vast and wealthy body of public creditors, whose security is bound up with the existing order of things.

 

The great virtue of the

 

CONSTITUTION of ENGLAND

 

-is the purity in which it recognises and establishes the fundamental principle of all mixed governments; that the supreme power of the STATE being invested in SEVERAL BODIES, the consent of each is required to the performance of any legislative act; and that no change can be made in the laws, nor any addition to them nor any act done affecting their lives, liberties, or property of the people, without the full and deliberate assent of each of the ruling powers.

 

The ruling powers are three:

 

The Sovereign

 

The Lords

 

The Commons

 

-of whom the Lords represent themselves only, unless in so far as the Prelates may be supposed to represent the Clergy; and the Scotch Peers to represent, by election of parliament, and the Irish, by election for life, the peerages of Scotland and Ireland respectively; the Commons represent their constituents, by whom they are for each parliament elected [1844].

If it should seem an exception to the fundamental principle now laid down that the CROWN has the power of making

 

PEACE and WAR

 

-and of entering into treaties with foreign states, operations, by which the welfare of the subject may be most materially affected, it is equally true that NO WAR can possibly be continued without the support of both Houses of Parliament; and that no peace concluded, or treaty made, can be binding, so as to affect any interests of the people, without subsequent approval in PARLIAMENT.

 

The Sovereign, [PRIME MINISTER] therefore, never can enter into any war, or pursue negotiation, without a positive certainty that the Parliament will assent to it and support the necessary operations, whether of hostility or of commercial regulations; and thus the only effect of this prerogative is to give due vigour and authority to the action of the Government in its intercourse with foreign powers and its care of the

NATIONAL DEFENCE.

 

[In 2005] the CROWN or in other words the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom [no longer united -by the way] signed twenty-five times the TREATY of ROME for Britain to become part of a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

-without the consent of the electorate who had been promised a

 

REFERENDUM

 

- on the constitutional issue raised but no date was given to enable the People to decide their future in EUROPE.

 

So we had Tony Blair signing a Treaty which had not received the consent of Parliament because of the obvious condition of a Referendum had not been satisfied.

IF THIS IS NOT TYRANNY

 

WHAT IS?

 

The following extracts are from the

 

PREFACE

 

of the

BRITISH CONSTITUION

 

By

 

HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

[1844]

 

GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

 

…It is quite impossible to understand accurately the principles of that Constitution without studying its history in all times; and an attentive examination of that history is fruitful of most important practical truths for the government of men’s conduct in the present day.

 

It shows that is country alone of the European states has in all ages possessed the great benefit of a Legislature distinct from the Executive Government, the

 

Sovereign of ENGLAND

 

-never having at any period had the power of making general laws. But it likewise shows most clearly that this or any other institution

can give little security to the liberties of the people, - little obstruction to the maladministration of public affairs.

 

The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.

 

It may be very wrong to say that forms of Government are of no importance, and that the best system is the one best administered.

 

But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of free institutions is there enabling men to obtain wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those that live under it to watch the conduct of their rulers, aiding them when right, checking them when wrong; and, above all, that no

 

CONSTITUTION

 

-however excellent, can supersede the necessity or dispense with the duty of constant vigilance.

 *

[In every Revolution there are those that decide on the crucial issues but there are many who leave the contesting to others but are themselves pleased to obtain the fruit of the victory without the toil and hardship that brings it about.

 

It is the same today in JUNE 2006 as it was in the civil war of the seventeenth century when those passionate about their country and claimed their just rights and liberties while parts of England were a neutral zone.]

WHICH PARTY ARE YOU?

ARE YOU A LOOKER ON?

ARE YOU CONTESTING?

 

* * *

 

MULTICULTURLISM

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

JUNE/06

H.F.1472--BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE 2006

*  *  *

 

 

[A MATTER OF FACT!]

[A LIBERAL PEER SHOULD REMEMBER]
Did you know there is a worldwide semi-secret war against white people. It started in 1923, in every country that has mostly white people, or used to have mostly white people, they are immigrating people from other races as fast as they can get away with it. They are encouraging whites to marry someone from a different race. They are also lowering the financial conditions so that the whites that do marry and used to do well, don’t want to have children or not many, because of financial conditions.
 

The white people on Earth came from Mars and were quickly genetically changed by the 8th Density about 66,000 years ago so they can mate with any Human and Earth would have one people. This was done so we would all get along better and one race wouldn’t become dominant wipe out the other races that moved here. The black Africans started here and so far 5 other races immigrated here and the whites were 2nd last, the Oriental Asians were last about 63,000 years ago and the 8th Density treated them the same, it wasn’t the Andromeda Council, like I was told last week.
 

White people are unique, we are the only ones who commonly have different eye and hair color and on average are less evil and more spiritual than the other races, except about the same as the Oriental Asians, but this has a little bit to do with the living conditions the last 300 years, all races have good & bad people. It is commonly said in the main stream media that the whites are an evil race and want to go to war with everyone, after all they pretty much wiped out the natives in North and South America and then brought slaves here.
Well this isn’t quite right, Columbus, Cortez and Pizarro were all Illuminati and didn’t have Human souls, they had the Reptilian lower soul, with little empathy for others.

The slaves were bought here on Jewish ships, most of the Jewish ship owners were Illuminati also. There were also white slaves (mostly Irish) and about 7,000 black slave owners in the USA. Less than 1 in 1,000 white people owned slaves and were constantly programmed that blacks were inferior from authorities, so the non slave owning whites would accept it.

The non slave owning Whites hated slavery, because they were forced by law to help capture run away slaves with no compensation and it was extremely hard to get a high paying job, with slaves doing a lot of work for free.

All the wars are started by and run by the Illuminati and Elite Jews. To many Whites are brainwashed to go along with the program, by the main stream media Which is all owned by the Jews or Illuminati.
 

Are you getting the picture, stop reading for a few seconds and see if you can figure it out. If there is no spiritual revolution, the brown dwarf star doesn’t come near the sun and damage Earth and the Illuminati and Elite Jews win, everyone else will become a worker/slaves. Whites won’t be allowed to marry or if they do they won’t be allowed to have children or if they do the paedophiles will take them. The only whites will be Illuminati or Jews and they will be in the ruling class, unelected and can’t be taken out of power.

 If you don’t want this future wake people up and help the spiritual revolution happen, become more spiritual. I think it’s going to happen and it’s called the Golden Age, it’s a wake up and win situation, but I think we’re going to get some wake up help. Even if your not White don’t accept that Whites should be wiped out, I certainly wouldn’t accept that Blacks should be wiped out or any other race. The only people I would accept being wiped out is the super evil ones. There will be a delightful place for everyone of every race in the Golden Age.
http://www.icheckyoursoul.com/

Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

what is the soul made of

afflict your souls in the bible

what is a person's soul

what is the soul of man

afflict your soul means

what is the soul according to the bible

afflict your soul kjv

what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

H.F.1424/2

  
 
 

Illuminati

The story starts about 45,000 years ago. There was a planet in an orbit closer to the sun than Jupiter. Many call this planet Maldek, Mars was it’s largest moon. The Reptilian people that lived there were very violent and negative. They went to war with the people that lived on Mars. They were greater in number, but the Martians had better technology. These people refused to quit attacking the peaceful Martians. So the Martians devised a plan to seriously damage Maldek, making it impossible for these people to stay there and get the war over. The weapon they used, turned out to be to strong and blew up Maldek, scattering pieces all over our solar system, making the asteroid belt, new moons for some of the outer planets and comets in the far reaches of our solar system.

About 8,000 of these Reptilian people were in large space ships and survived. So they decided to go live in our moon and kick out the few Draconians that lived there. The Reptilians (Draconians) soon returned in force. So they had to leave in a hurry, while their ships were being blasted and crash landed in Antarctica, which at that time was in a tropical area. Now they soon no longer had space flight, because of the Draconian continued attacks. They had trouble living on Earth as their bodies didn’t agree with Earth’s elements. Humanity had just came out of cataclysms caused by Maldek blowing up, so they were few in number and lost their technology and now were sort of primitive.

These people captured some Humans and using genetics made hybrids of themselves, so they could live on Earth. They made 2 kinds of hybrids, one kind was very similar to and could mate with Humanity. The other kind was different and had elongated heads and became the ruling class and could not mate with Humanity. There are still some of these left, although they stay secret. Within 2,000 years the brown dwarf star, came through our solar system as it does every 3,557 years. Earth was hit hard and had a devastating pole shift, making the south pole in about the center of Antarctica as it is today.

Most all of the people on Earth died as there was a flash freeze in the new polar areas, killing a lot of animals too. So the Reptilian-Mammal hybrid people that were similar to Humanity lived with and bred with Humanity. When one of their females had children, the children would get one of their souls, regardless of who the father is. These people, the Illuminati today can tell each other apart from Humanity, but Humanity can’t seem to tell that they have different souls. They arranged to put each other into positions of power, like kings and queens and still hold these positions today. Although with the invention of the internet and spreading of knowledge, they are starting to lose control.

With them in power, we have war, central banks, shortages and other forms of suffering. Because of them we live in a negative world. In 2021 our 3rd cycle will finish and positive soul groups get to move up to the 2nd realm, 5th dimension (4th density). We are in the 1st realm, 4th dimension (3rd density) now. So we must get the Illuminati out of power and turn positive, to move up to 4th density. A soul can either go through 1 cycle of 3rd or 4th density (or some of both) and make ascension to 5th density (12th dimension on Earth). If we get in 4th density life improves, our bodies will be a little better and matter a little different, the biggest change is another component of time. Many of us will gain some telepathy and see a wider range of the spectrum and other improvements.

Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

what is the soul made of

afflict your souls in the bible

what is a person's soul

what is the soul of man

afflict your soul means

what is the soul according to the bible

afflict your soul kjv

what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

 

FEBRUARY 5-2016

H.F.1424/2S

 
 

EU QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

There are over 1000 Bulletins on the EU in our

BULLETIN FILE and EU FILE

 CLICK FOR TOP TOPICS

JUNE -2009

1]     EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]     WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU ?

3]     THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]     THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[      THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]      COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]     OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]      MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]       OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10]    VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]    THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]    PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14]    THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]    A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

 WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]    WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]    100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT1          100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU-PT2

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007] -NOT MUCH LUCK HERE!

33]    ALMOST 50% OF EU BUDGET SPENT ON CAP FATCATS

34]    SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU

35]    WHY BRITISH BUSINESS IS TURNING AGAINST THE EU

36]    BRITISH CONSTITUTION-IDENTITY AND VALUES

37]    MODERN DILEMA IN POLITICS-TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM.

38]    LETTER FROM LORD KILMUIR TO TED HEATH WITH TRUE FACTS OF EU

39]  

 

 

 INTERVIEW WITH RUSSIAN DISSIDENT WHO WARNED OF EU DICTATORSHIP

40]   The Truth About A Federal Europe - Part I

41]   Cost of EU to UK - £4,811 million in 2003= 40 District Hospitals equipped and staffed and funded.

42]  CAN THE 1972 ACCESSION TREATY TO THE EU BE REPEALED?

43]  Neil Kinnock in glover - but failed to stop the Shadow of graft over EU’s £68bn spending.

44]  Now the EU wants a single Foreign Office to replace Nation-States Embassies.

45]   How the EU takes over Nation-States.

46]  A Fabian Europhile of 1947 supported Independent Nation-States and the Rule of Law

47]     The New European Constitution - Part 1

48]  12-Point Summary of EU Constitution continued - Part 2

49]  The New European Constitution - Part 1

50]  An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.

51]   Britain takes over as biggest contributor to the EU Budget

52]  Neil Kinnock sacked honest Auditor because of refusal to sign off questionable EU Accounts.

53]    General De Gaulle acclaims British national institutions back in 1960.

54]    Brussels scams can let an MEP fiddle £60,000 a year.

55]  The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 1

56]    The European Constitution - Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 2

57]    Europe and a conspiracy of Silence.

58]    Ninety-nine countries will soon have Free Trade with EU -without paying a cent to Brussels.

59]   Britain must leave the EU as UN show best area for expansion will be USA-Anglo.Saxon sphere.

60]  82 million Germans have no say as MP’s back EU Constitution.

61]    The EU big brother policy reaches back over two millennium.

62]     Europe: It’s the modern version of the white man’s burden.

63]    E U COUNCIL OF MINISTERS.

64]    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.

65]    German - Nazi - Geopolitical Centre established in Madrid in 1943 by Heinrich Himmler.

66]     What were the Dark Actors Playing Games, which the patriot Dr David Kelly referred?

67]    DEMOCRACY IS A DIALECTICAL FARCE BECAUSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES CALL THE SHOTS NOT SO-CALLED DEMOCRACIES.

68]    Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally And Cease Payment Says Queen’s Counsel.

69]     EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE.

70]     NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

71]      WHY NO TREATY LIMITING EU POWERS

72]     THE E.U.’S VERY OWN AESOPIAN LANGUAGE.

73]    WHAT IF ENGLAND HADN'T JOINED THE EU

74]    67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM EU

75]   WILL IRELAND SAVE EUROPE FROM ITSELF?

76]   WHY EU REGIONAL POLICY WILL DESTROY THE NATION STATE

77]     EMPIRES HAVE GONE AND MOST PEOPLE LIVE IN NATION STATES.

78 THE FINAL BETRAYAL- WHICH TOOK PLACE IN 2008 

79]    WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR-NOW BROWN-SHE DIDN'T - BUT SOLD US TO THE EU80] 

80]     Almost everything ,which is precious in our civilisation, has come from small States

81]     THE EU BIG BROTHER POLICY REACHES BACK OVER TWO MILLENNIUM

82]     THE EURO A DOOMED CURRENCY

83]      GERMANY AS STRONG MAN OF EUROPE

84]     BRITAIN AND EUROPE-THE CULTURE OF DECEIT

85]     NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

86]     A BETTER WAY FORWARD TOGETHER IN EUROPE-OUT OF THE EUROPEAN UNIOn

87]      A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

88]     TO CONTROL OUR COURTS AND BORDERS IS THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL EUROSCEPTIC STRATEGY.
89]     BLACK OPERATIONS AND TRICKERY BIND UK TO EU
90]     HITLER-HAUSHOFER AND GEORGE KENNON-PENTAGON PLANS IDENTICAL
91]     Oh Boyo - Family on Brussels gravy train cost TAXPAYER £34 million and RISING!
92]     NAZI TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH LEFT £5 MILLION TO HIS OWN CHARITY-HIS HOME.

93]      WHY DID THEY WANT BRITAIN IN EUROPE -  IN 1963
94]       Lies and The Betrayal of Britain
95]        Be Warned - The lies of 1975 still haunt us
96]      THe Strange Case of the Werner Report
97]      1972 EU Communities Act
98]        Further 200 Reasons why to Reject the Euro and E
99]      New elite threatens EU project admits Lib-Dem Peer
100]     The secretive Bilderberger Group will destroy True Democracy
101]     BBC EUROPHILE BIAS-UPDATE-by LORD PEARSON

102]     How ‘a good European’ turned into a eurosceptic whistle-blower

103]     HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007
104]     IF Gordon Brown forces this EU TREATY on us, you can kiss goodbye to DEMOCRACY  -HE DID!
105]     FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ARE THE FUTURE OF WORLD TRADE
106]     Twelve Mighty Reasons why you must say 'No' to the EU

107]     How much does it cost the UK in the EU
108]     THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL
109]      IF MONETARY UNION GOES-EUROPEAN PROJECT IS UNDERMINED
110]      THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN
111]      YOU CAN'T SEPARATE POLITICS AND MORALS
112]      IRAQ SOCIETY DESCENDING INTO CIVIL WAR BETWEEN SUNNIS - SHI-ITES AND KURDS
113]         TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND
 

www.eutruth.org.uk

  

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE-2009

H. F .11 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 
 
 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

JUNE 2-2015

H.F.1388

 

 MAIN ARTICLE BELOW BROUGHT FORWARD FROM MAY, 2006

THEY NEVER LEARN!

[As we have said many times over the past decades governments fail to learn lessons about key matters vital to the public at large such as LAW & ORDER-IMMIGRATION-and a host of other matters which should have been finally resolved to the satisfaction of the GENERAL PUBLIC many years ago. The reason there is this constant CHAOS is that MINISTERS tread softly because there is always a shortage of FINANCE. Well! we  know where there is a mountain of GOLD in the so-called FOREIGN AID BUDGET! to supply resources to SECURITY-NHS-PENSIONS-ROADS and other ESSENTIAL NEEDS of the PEOPLE. BUT there will be NO CHANGE until PR -PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION is introduced into our POLITICAL SYSTEM. REMEMBER-THE GANG OF THREE or is it now the GANG of TWO have no fears of not alternating as a future government so it is IMPORTANT that the PEOPLE have other chooses to keep our POLITICAL SYSTEM in GOOD HEALTH. Soon we will be FREE of the EU and the their JUSTICE SYSTEM and their other ABOMINATIONS but unfortunately we still have the CURSE of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS with us which destroying the very FREEDOM of SPEECH and PERSON which our ANCESTORS fought for those centuries AGO.  WE see the once VOICE of the PEOPLE the once PARTY of the COMMON MAN in TURMOIL because of its links to a FOREIGN POWER. We have raised the QUESTION where are the FRIENDS of ENGLAND in our WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT?  yet there is a LOBBY of FRIENDS of ISRAEL in BOTH MAIN PARTIES with at least 80% of CONSERVATIVE MP's members. WE ASK should such INFLUENCE be PERMITTED in our HOUSE OF COMMONS.  This is NOT a RACIAL ISSUE but one of FAIRNESS to ALL NATIONS on our PLANET EARTH. WE have also raised the question of UNDUE INFLUENCE in the AFFAIRS of our ISLAND HOME and the difficulty of being CANDID of the MATTERS of the MOMENT of that FOREIGN POWER.       We have to ask ourselves if there was no FOREIGN LOBBY GROUP in PARLIAMENT there would have been no CRIES of RACISM echoing in our HALLOWED HOUSE in WESTMINSTER and what a great RELIEF that would be TO ALL CONCERNED.]

*  *  *

What PLANET are JUDGES living ON?

 

*

Daily Mail

Wednesday, May 31-2006.

 

by

 

Melanie Phillips

 

ARE OUR senior judges simply living on a different planet from the rest of us lesser mortals? Our most senior judge, The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, has launched yet another judicial broadside against apparent evils of imprisonment.

In Lord Phillips’ UNIVERSE, it appears that PRISON is NOT the PLACE for CRIMINALS.

 

Instead, wherever possible judges should pass community sentences -which he admits will not be tolerated by the public unless they include ‘significant punishment’ -because ‘the sensible place for rehabilitation is the community.’

 

EXCUSE ME?

COMMUNITY SENTENCES FAIL TO REHABILITATE CRIMINALS. THEY RESULT IN AN EVEN HIGHER RATE OF RECIDIVISM THAN JAIL SENTENCES.

 

This is hardly surprising, since community sentences seem to be hardship-free zones.

According to a recent report by the

Chief Inspector of Probation

-burglars and robbers in London are being set to restore antique furniture or make costumes for the Notting Hill carnival.

[You couldn’t make it up if you tried]

 

And thousands of criminals sentenced to unpaid community service do nothing at all some days.

 

When they turn up, there are no probation staff to supervise them, so they are simply sent home. And those who don’t who don’t even bother to turn up are NOT taken back to COURT and re-sentenced.

 

It may amaze Lord Phillips to learn that ‘significant punishment’ means going

 

TO PRISON.

 

YES, overcrowding means prisons don’t function properly. But the remedy for that is

 

TO BUILD MORE PRISONS.

 

YET our senior judges harbour an obsessive animosity towards prison, doubtless because of the way Human Rights doctrine has so muddled the way we look at the very concepts of

CRIME AND PUNISHMENT.

 

Lord Phillips’ remarks, however were more bizarre still. One reason prison numbers are rising, he said, was that drug users were deliberately committing crimes to get into prison drug programmes. He had come across prisoners offered community sentences who preferred to go to prison so that they could get treatment.

 

Offenders

 

What on earth does the Lord Justice have under his wig? There is no proper evidence for this at all.

 

Indeed, an investigation by MPs said last year that fewer than half of all jails had drug treatment courses, that ONLY one in ten prisoners who use drugs got places on drug treatment programmes, and that half of those who did go on courses NEVER FINISHED THEM.

 

As for supposedly non-existent community drug treatment programmes, they do EXIST-

but are pretty useless in turning offenders away from crime.

 

In a recent report, the Commons Public Accounts Committee observed that drug treatment orders were ‘more like a

GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD’

than a rehabilitation programme.

 

 

Only 25 per cent of those who accepted them ever completed them.

 

It is deeply worrying not only that a senior judge should make such odd and ill-informed remarks, BUT that the JUDICIARY should assume it knows better what policies should be pursued.

 

Yesterday, the former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf [The burglars’ friend] expanded upon such arrogance.

Apparently making a coded attack on the Prime Minister for his criticisms of a judge over the immigration ruling, Lord Woolf condemned politicians for ‘knocking’ individual judges, because it was ‘very damaging’.

 

So lets get this right. Judges may make comments, which are not only wildly inappropriate because they are intensely political, but also reveal themselves to be woefully OUT OF TOUCH.

 

Yet then they loftily inform us that we should not criticise them for doing so, because they apparently reside on some celestial plane above public debate.

 

Of course, in principle politicians and judges should have a Chinese wall between them. And it was once clearly understood that politicians and judges stood on either side of the wall.

 

But the problem is that the judges have torn up that understanding and are now getting involved in matters of POLICY such as the role of imprisonment or drug treatment, which ARE properly the territory of POLITICIANS.

 

The judges have simply grown too big for their wigs.

 

One of the main reasons is the Human Rights law. Lord Woolf robustly defended this yesterday and said that any resulting tension between GOVERNMENT and JUDICIARY was healthy in a democracy.

 

Weakness

But the fact is that Human Rights law has given the judges a weapon to undermine democracy, by setting up themselves rather than politicians as the people who should decide how the country should be ruled.

 

This first surfaced back in the 1980s, when senior judges decided that the long years of Tory government and the weakness of the opposition posed such a threat to democracy that the judiciary should take upon itself the mantle of opposition instead.

 

In the days before the passage of the Human Rights Act [1998], this took the form of challenges to immigration law through judicial review. Such attempts to change the direction of government policy through court rulings became known as judicial activism.

 

When Tony Bair came to power, instead of putting the judges back behind the Chinese wall he attached a turbo-charge to their already burgeoning judicial activism by introducing the Human Rights Act.

 

This change in the behaviour of judges was by no means restricted to Britain. Judicial activism had become a phenomenon throughout the

WESTERN WORLD.

 

In America, Australia, the countries of the EU and elsewhere, the judges -

Acting as a kind of judicial fifth column around the world - are arrogating to themselves power, which belong to the world of politics.

 

Earlier this year, in a little noticed address in London to the Law Commission, a prominent Australian judge, Michael Kirby - a key proponent of judicial activism- spelt out the judge’s agenda with unabashed frankness.

 

The institutions of government in both Britain and Australia, he said, had become unbalanced. Governments had become too powerful, civil servants and MPs had lost influence to political advisers and ministerial accountability was a thing of the past.

 

Amen to that.

 

BUT he went on to say that as a result ‘the very notion of “sovereignty” of parliament has become a somewhat inapposite concept’

 

There should be instead a new type of government led by judges and based on HUMAN RIGHTS LAW - which was already developing in BRITAIN.

 

So the remedy for politicians who were abusing their powers was to replace them by JUDICIAL POWER.

 

This was nothing less than an all-out attack on parliamentary democracy.

 

[Whatever is left of it after nine years of Tony Blair]

 

Yet Justice Kirby was given a platform by our principle legal reform body -the Law Commission - and before an appreciative audience, which included Lord Phillips, Lord Woolf and the Lord Chancellor.

 

Despised

 

English judges express similar alarming distain for democracy. Last year Lord Bingham, the Senior Law Lord, said that the Human Rights Convention existed to protect vulnerable minorities. Which were sometimes disliked, resented or despised.

 

It should therefore come as no surprise, he went on, that decisions vindicating their rights ‘should provoke howls of criticism by politicians and the mass media. They generally reflect majority opinion.’

 

So majority opinion, on this account, was essentially illegitimate, and the role of the JUDICIARY was to use HUMAN RIGHTS LAW to do it down.

 

This unashamed justification of judicial supremacism is as anti m-democratic as it is arrogant. We are living through a kind of creeping judicial coup d’etat driven by a profound contempt for the

PUBLIC OPINION

-to which politicians are answerable.

 

It is parliamentary weakness that is to blame. Only if Parliament reasserts itself will the

 

RULE OF LAW

 

-     be rescued from

 

RULE OF LAWYERS

 

-who have so high-handedly hijacked it?

 

* * *

[Font altered -bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets]

*

 

[Well it must occur to many in this country that the present sorry predicament of

 

OUR PARLIAMENT

 

- only benefits those in the Judiciary and of course the growing army of lawyers many of whom have grown rich on their human rights harvest which Tony Blair and his flatmate Lord Falconer have no doubt been sowing with hindsight for years. What better way to destroy an immemorial institution of over 700 in the making than to undermine it from within while professing that their attempts to govern are undermined by the JUDICIARY?

 

WHO CAN WE POSSIBLY TRUST?

 

THERE MUST SURELY BE A SEQUAL TO FOLLOW?

 

 

* * *

MAY/06

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1665BROUGHT  FORWARD FROM MAY-06

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 SEP 19

OCT-19

NOV-19

DEC-19

 

 
 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

      9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA
LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND
SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND
100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

 THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

*

 THE DOWNFALL

OF

A ONCE DECLARED

 IRON LADY

AND

HER ARDENT AND PASSIONATE PROMISE

 IN 2016

 

'BETTER A

NO DEAL

THAN A BAD DEAL'

*

'BREXIT MEANS BREXIT'

*

'TO LEAVE

THE EU

ON

MARCH 29,2019'

AS we had previously stated

COMPROMISE

should never be considered

when the return of our ancient freedoms given away by a so-called

 CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT

IN

 1972

to be reclaimed in

March 2019

in answer to a people's vote in a

REFERENDUM

 in

JUNE 2O16

 

when an overwhelming

17.4 MILLION PATRIOTS

VOTED FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE

FREE COUNTRY

FROM THE CRUMBLING CONFIDENCE TRICK

calling itself the

EUROPEAN UNION

soon to be a

SUPERSTATE

*

 

'Trust not him that has broken faith.'

SHAKESPEARE

*
 Could the European elections herald the end of the EU - Eurosceptic parties all across the EU look like doing well!.... - Daily Express

https://www.express.co.uk/.../expresscomment/.../european-election-2019-vote-end-eu-comment-ross-clark
‎
 *
 AGITATION
Agitation prevents rebellion, keeps the peace, and secures progress. Every step she gains is gained forever. Muskets are the weapons of animals. Agitation is the atmosphere of the brains.-
Wendell Phillips. Am.orator

*
 Eurosceptics are fighting for the return of freedoms once secured by MAGNA CARTA and the PETITION of RIGHT.
 

 

 

Benjamin Fulford 5-27-19… “As Theresa May loses battle of Britain,

 West Coast oligarchs sue for peace”

Posted on 2019/05/27 by

New weekly report from Ben. All I will add here is that this one is extremely fascinating. Suggest “holding on to hat”, if wearing one.

“The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

“…U.S. President Donald Trump has spent the Memorial Day weekend in Japan, in part to avoid assassination as moves begin to end the long political deadlock in Washington, D.C., Pentagon and Japanese right-wing sources say.

“…why the resignation of May is crucial to breaking the political deadlock… in 2016 the Rockefeller / Clinton oligarchs asked their Rothschild counterparts in the UK to circumvent U.S. law in order to spy on Trump and concoct the Russiagate scandal to impeach him. May’s resignation means the British Nazi…-allied oligarchs who fought against Trump are now all being purged from the British military / intelligence / political power structure, according to British royal family sources. This purge will be accompanied by a similar purge in the U.S.”

As Theresa May loses battle of Britain, West Coast oligarchs sue for peace
 By Benjamin Fulford, White Dragon Society, May 27, 2019

The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

May 27, 2019

 

H.F.1853/1

 

 

H.F.1849

 

 

*

[A REMINDER OF A SOLEMN PROMISE!]

 

FROM JANUARY 18,2017

 

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 
  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
    •
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BritAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro

By James Slack Political Editor For The Daily Mail



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

Brexit will let us rediscover role as trading power | Daily Mail Online

Theresa May's Brexit speech puts Cameron to shame | Daily Mail ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Commons and Lords get ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Full reports and analysis

 

A great nation is reborn: Quitting will let us rediscover our role as a ...

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.
 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

  WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

  WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

  WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

  

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

 *		 7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

  WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

  WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW
 
 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 
Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 
 

 
 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 
 
 
 

ENGLAND
  ENGLAND'S DAY-23RD APRIL-ENGLAND'S DAY
  Understanding Easter- a part of our Christian cultural force which has made us what we are.
   Our Christian Festival of Easter which many know so little and some none.
  CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION
  THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY
  WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY
 

English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died
 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 1
 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 2
 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 3
 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 4
 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 5
 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 1
 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 2
 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 3
 

Christianity, The People, and Ethics - Part 1
 

Christianity, The People, and Ethics - Part 2
 

Alfred –Christian King of the English - Part 1
 

Alfred -Christian King of the English - Part 2
 

 Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty
 

A Defence of Christianity by a once militant agnostic - Part 1.
 

 Dangers of a supreme parliament.
 

 Who CARES about MORALITY?
 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 1.
 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 2.
 

 A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 3.
 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 4.
 

 A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 5.
 

Freedom of Speech-A Freedom, which cannot be abused - is not worth having.
 

Our Past is embedded in our national consciousness-It asks were we came from and who we are.
 

An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.
 

Blairland has almost destroyed the Family Values in its quest for supposed Equality.
 

Two loving parents are more important than good teachers.
 

Celebrate 700 years of Constitutional Development in 2007- from Edward 1 the English Justinian.
 

IMMIGRATION-THE BETRAYAL OF BRICK LANE BY MULTICULTURALISM INSTEAD OF INTEGRATION
 

 The Common Law Of England -Its Heritage and Importance to Parliamentary Democracy Today.
 

Home Rule For Scotland WHY NOT Home Rule For ENGLAND

 

NOR SHALL MY SWORD - THE REINVENTION OF ENGLAND
 

Robocop or Dixon of Dock Green -Millions of Pensioners will choose the latter. The true eyes and ears and friend of the Community.
 

THOUGHTS ON ST. GEORGE's DAY-FREEDOM
 

THE ENEMY EVERYWHERE
 

THOUSANDS OF ENGLISH/BRITISH CITIZENS
REJECTING EU CITIZENSHIP-
WHY DON'T YOU?
 

Free trade agreement.s are the future of world trade
 

THE VEIL – THE CROSS –A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.
 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING
 

ENGLAND'S PLACE IN THE UNION
 

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

  
 

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE - TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUIT- -NOT MULTICULTURAL.
 

Commonwealth Realms v The Constitution for Europe-PT 1- 4
 

DECLARATION OF RESISTANCE
 

 Free Speech - Religious Opinion
 

NO WHERE ELSE flies the White Ensign on top of its tower but the village with the Nelson Touch - As we would EXPECT.
   
   
   
  H.F.1244
 
 
 
 

 
 
MAY-16 victory

JUN-16

REFERENDUM

 JUL-16 AUG-16 SEP-16 OCT-16 NOV-16 DEC-16 JAN - 17 FEB-17
 

MAR-17

 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 SEP 19

OCT-19

NOV-19

DEC-19

 

 

 

- (1994 -Official Website - NOVEMBER - PT 6 - 2019 )-

     PART 1 -  PART 2   -  PART 3   -PART  4  - PART 5 -   PART 6  - 

OCT H 1 2
3 4 5  6

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019      MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019      

  MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2019

       MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

 

- (1994 -Official Website - MARCH-PT 5- 2019 )-

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019         MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

       MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

 

*

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012